000.280P364DP364DP5YP5YP364DP364D690000000080000000013400000013400000010.700.720.970false--12-31FY20190000004977falsefalse7300700000012090000007606300000015060000000.871.041.080.100.100.100.10190000000019000000001900000000190000000013475400001349309000are generally entitled to one vote per share until they have been held by the same beneficial owner for a continuous period of 48 months, at which time they become entitled to 10 votes per share.14800000014800000037400000037400000056000000002027-10-23 These bonds bear interest at a fixed rate of .963% per annum and then at six-month Euro Yen LIBOR plus an applicable spread on and after the day immediately following April 18, 2024.bears interest at a rate per annum equal to the TIBOR, or alternate TIBOR, if applicable, plus the applicable TIBOR margin152000000002930000000089000000006000000000060000000000250000000005000000000152000000002930000000089000000006000000000060000000000250000000005000000000152000000002930000000089000000006000000000060000000000250000000005000000000152000000002930000000089000000006000000000030000000000600000000002500000000050000000000.04750.040.040.014880.011590.01750.009320.06450.0690.036250.036250.03250.028750.021080.00470.00320.04750.040.040.014880.011590.01750.009320.06450.06900.036250.036250.03250.028750.021080.00470.00320.04750.040.040.014880.011590.01750.009320.06450.0690.036250.036250.03250.028750.021080.00570.00420.04750.040.040.014880.011590.011220.01750.008430.005000.009340.009320.06450.06900.036250.036250.03250.028750.009630.021080.00570.0042The debentures bear interest at an initial rate of 2.108% per annum through October 22, 2027, or earlier redemption. Thereafter, the rate of the interest of the debentures will be reset every five years at a rate of interest equal to the then-current JPY 5-year Swap Offered Rate plus 205 basis points.These notes are redeemable at the Parent Company's option in whole at any time or in part from time to time at a redemption price equal to the greater of: (i) the aggregate principal amount of the notes to be redeemed or (ii) the amount equal to the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments for principal of and interest on the notes to be redeemed, not including any portion of the payments of interest accrued as of such redemption date, discounted to such redemption date on a semiannual basis at the treasury rate plus 20 basis points, plus in each case, accrued and unpaid interest on the principal amount of the notes to be redeemed to, but excluding, such redemption date.P3MP3MP3MP3MP3M150000000015000000000180000000.00710.00180.02840.02750.00710.00180.02840.02750.01200.00190.00430.00120.02090.01890.00430.00120.02090.01890.01000.00100.00710.00180.02840.02750.00710.00180.02840.02750.02110.00280.00430.00120.02090.01890.00430.00120.02090.01890.01590.00130.21310000003100000000000.06750.0700.0060.0300.0450.0600.0100.0250.02000000000.002250.00500.000850.00305000000000050000000000500000001000000000100000000000100000000250000000P20Y0.0026000000002100000000100000010000000000004977afl:SeniorNotesPointEightFourFourPercentDueAprilTwentyThirtyThreeMember2021-12-31

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20192022
or
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from             to             
Commission File Number: 001-07434
afl-20221231_g1.jpg
Aflac Incorporated
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Georgia58-1167100
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
Georgia58-1167100
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
1932 Wynnton RoadColumbusGeorgia31999
(Address of principal executive offices)(ZIP Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: 706.323.3431706.323.3431
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each classTrading Symbols(s)Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, $.10 Par ValueAFLNew York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:    None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    þ Yes    ¨  No
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.    ¨  Yes    þ  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.            þ  Yes  ¨  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).    þ  Yes  ¨  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filerþAccelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer¨Smaller reporting company  
Emerging growth company
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).  Yes    þ  No
The aggregate market value of the voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 28, 2019,30, 2022, was $40,396,253,541.$34,906,869,651.
The number of shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding at February 12, 2020,16, 2023, with $.10 par value, was 722,520,700.
612,208,648. 
Documents Incorporated By Reference
Certain information contained in the Notice and Proxy Statement for the Company’s 20202023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders is incorporated by reference into Part III hereof.





PART I

FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a safe harbor to encourage companies to provide prospective information, so long as those informational statements are identified as forward-looking and are accompanied by meaningful cautionary statements identifying important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those included in the forward-looking statements. Aflac Incorporated and its subsidiaries (the Company) desire to take advantage of these provisions. This report contains cautionary statements identifying important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected herein, and in any other statements made by Company officials in communications with the financial community and contained in documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Forward-looking statements are not based on historical information and relate to future operations, strategies, financial results or other developments. Furthermore, forward-looking information is subject to numerous assumptions, risks and uncertainties. In particular, statements containing words such as the ones listed below or similar words, as well as specific projections of future results, generally qualify as forward-looking. The Company undertakes no obligation to update such forward-looking statements.
• expect• anticipate• believe• goal• objective
• may• should• estimate• intends• projects
• will• assumes• potential• target• outlook

The Company cautions readers that the following factors, in addition to other factors mentioned from time to time, could cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements:

difficult conditions in global capital markets and the economy, including those caused by COVID-19
defaults and credit downgrades of investments
global fluctuations in interest rates and exposure to significant interest rate risk
concentration of business in Japan
limited availability of acceptable yen-denominated investments
foreign currency fluctuations in the yen/dollar exchange rate
differing interpretations applied to investment valuations
significant valuation judgments in determination of expected credit losses recorded on the Company's investments
decreases in the Company's financial strength or debt ratings
decline in creditworthiness of other financial institutions
concentration of the Company's investments in any particular single-issuer or sector
major public health issues, including COVID-19 and any resulting or coincidental economic effects, on the Company's business and financial results
the Company's ability to attract and retain qualified sales associates, brokers, employees, and distribution partners
events related to the ongoing Japan Post investigation and other matters
competitive environment and ability to anticipate and respond to market trends
deviations in actual experience from pricing and reserving assumptions
ability to continue to develop and implement improvements in information technology systems and on successful execution of revenue growth and expense management initiatives
defaults and credit downgrades of investments
exposure to significant interest rate risk
concentration of business in Japan
limited availability of acceptable yen-denominated investments
failure to comply with restrictions on policyholder privacy and information security
interruption in telecommunication, information technology and other operational systems, or a failure to maintain the security, confidentiality or privacy of sensitive data residing on such systems
subsidiaries' ability to pay dividends to the Parent Company
inherent limitations to risk management policies and procedures
operational risks of third party vendors
tax rates applicable to the Company may change
failure to comply with restrictions on policyholder privacy and information security
extensive regulation and changes in law or regulation by governmental authorities
competitive environment and ability to anticipate and respond to market trends
catastrophic events, including, but not necessarily limited to, as a result of climate change, epidemics, pandemics (such as COVID-19), tornadoes, hurricanes, earthquakes, tsunamis, war or other military action, terrorism or other acts of violence, and damage incidental to such events
difficult conditions in global capital markets and the economy
ability to protect the Aflac brand and the Company's reputation
extensive regulation and changes in law or regulation by governmental authorities
foreign currency fluctuations in the yen/dollar exchange rate
tax rates applicable to the Company may change
decline in creditworthiness of other financial institutions
significant valuation judgments in determination of amount of impairments taken on the Company's investments
U.S. tax audit risk related to conversion of the Japan branch to a subsidiary
subsidiaries' ability to pay dividends to the Parent Company
decreases in the Company's financial strength or debt ratings
inherent limitations to risk management policies and procedures
concentration of the Company's investments in any particular single-issuer or sector
differing judgments applied to investment valuations
ability to effectively manage key executive succession
changes in accounting standards
level and outcome of litigation
allegations or determinations of worker misclassification in the United States



1



ITEM 1. BUSINESS
OVERVIEW

Aflac Incorporated (the Parent Company) was incorporated in 1973 under the laws of the state of Georgia. The Parent Company and its subsidiaries (collectively, the Company) provide financial protection to more than 50 million people worldwide. The Company’s principal business is supplemental health and life insurance products with the goal to provide customers the best value in supplemental insurance products in the United States (U.S.) and Japan. When a policyholder or insured gets sick or hurt, the Company pays cash benefits fairly and promptly for eligible claims, directly to the insured (unless assigned otherwise). For more than sixty years,claims. Throughout its 67-year history, the Company’s supplemental insurance policies have given policyholders the opportunity to focus on recovery, not financial stress.

The Company has continued to develop and expand its product offerings over time. In Japan, the Company is cultivating an innovation-driven culture to meet the rapidly changing customer and societal needs. Through acquisitions completed in 2019 and 2020, the Company expanded its U.S. product offerings to network dental and vision and employer paid group life and disability. The Company has also been investing in new distribution opportunities through acquisitions and partnerships. In recent years, the Company has pivoted to digital sales methods and accelerated related digital investments. For information on the reporting segments see the Result of Operations by Segment section of Item 7. Management Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A).
The Company is authorized to conduct insurance business in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, several U.S. territories and Japan. The Company’s website is: www.aflac.com. Information included on the Company’s website is not incorporated by reference into this filing. The Company makes available free of charge through its website, its annual report on Form 10-K, its quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably practicable after they have been electronically filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

REVENUE-GENERATING ACTIVITIES

The Company's strategy for growth in the U.S. and Japan has remained straightforward and consistent for many years. The Company develops relevant supplemental health insurance products offering financial protection from the rising out-of-pocket expenses associated with medical events that are not covered by the insureds' primary coverage. The Company also offers a complement of other voluntary health and sells themlife insurance products to fit the needs of its customers. Additionally, the Company aims to obtain more customers by selling where the customer prefers to purchase protection, whether through expandedan agent or broker, a distribution channels.partner or directly from the Company. To help promote its insurance products, the Company’s marketing campaigns feature the Aflac Duck.

long-termgrowthstrategy.jpgLONG-TERM GROWTH STRATEGY
afl-20221231_g2.jpg



2

In 1999, the Company had been running commercials for nearly a decade, but its brand awareness was hovering at about 10%. An innovative marketing campaign with something unique and memorable that would build brand awareness was needed. The Aflac Duck’s first commercial in the U.S., “Park Bench,” aired on January 1, 2000 and taught consumers how to pronounce “Aflac.” The Aflac Duck made his international debut in Japan in 2003. In the two decades since his U.S. debut, the Aflac Duck has become one of the most familiar advertising icons in the world, appearing in severalmany commercials and countless print ads in both the U.S. and Japan. Today, the Aflac Duck is a helpmate who increases brand knowledge and connection.

The Company is authorized to conduct insurance business in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, several U.S. territories and Japan. The Company’s website is: www.aflac.com. Information included on the Company’s website is not incorporated by reference into this filing. The Company makes available free of charge through its website, its annual report on Form 10-K, its quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably practicable after they have been electronically filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

REPORTING SEGMENTS

The Company's insurance business consists of two reporting segments: Aflac Japan and Aflac U.S. The Parent Company’s primary insurance subsidiaries aresubsidiary in the Aflac Japan segment is Aflac Life Insurance Japan Ltd. in Japan (Aflac Japan) and(ALIJ). Aflac U.S. includes the insurance subsidiaries American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus (Aflac); Continental American Insurance Company (CAIC), branded as Aflac Group Insurance (AGI); American Family Life Assurance Company of New York (Aflac New York) and; Tier One Insurance Company (TOIC) in the U.S. (collectively, Aflac U.S.).


2



Aflac Japan is the principal contributor to the Parent Company’s consolidated earnings. Aflac Japan's revenues, including realized gains and losses on its investment portfolio, accounted for 69% of the Company's total revenues in 2019, compared with 70% in both 2018 and 2017. The percentage of the Company's total assets attributable to Aflac Japan was 83% and 84% at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The conversion of Aflac Japan to a subsidiary structure in April 2018 did not affect the Company's segment reporting structure.

Effective January 1, 2018, investments of Aflac U.S. as well as certain sub-advised assets of Aflac Japan, are managed by the Company’s U.S. asset management subsidiary, Aflac Asset Management LLC (AAM), and investments of Aflac Japan are managed pursuant to an investment advisory agreement between Aflac Japan and the Company's asset management subsidiary in Japan, Aflac Asset Management Japan Ltd. (AAMJ). AAMJ is licensed as a discretionary asset manager under the Japan Financial Instruments and Exchange Act and is subject to rules of the Japan Investment Advisors Association, a self-regulatory organization with mandatory membership for Japan investment managers. AAM and AAMJ are reported in the "Corporate and other segment" category; however, the assets that they manage are reported in the respective Aflac Japan; and Aflac U.S. business segments.

In November 2019, the Company acquired Argus Holdings, LLC and its subsidiaryBenefits Solutions (ABS), formerly Argus Dental & Vision, Inc. (Argus), a benefits management organization and national network dental and vision company, which provides a platform for Aflac Dental and Vision. TheVision in the U.S.
In November 2020, the Company, paid $75 million at closingthrough its insurance subsidiaries Aflac and madeAflac New York, acquired Zurich North America’s U.S. Corporate Life and Pensions business, which consists of group life, disability and absence management products. Aflac and Aflac New York agreed to reinsure on an additional commitmentindemnity basis Zurich North America’s U.S. in-force group life and disability policies with annualized earned premium of upover $100 million. Aflac also acquired assets needed to $21 million in contingent consideration payable over three years based onsupport the achievement by Argus of certain performance targets. Argus isgroup life and disability business, along with an addition to the Aflac U.S. segment.absence management platform.

Revenues derived from any customer did not exceed 10% of consolidated premiums and other revenues for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018. For information on the Company's results of operations and financial information by segment, see Item 7. Management Discussion and Analysis (MD&A)MD&A and Note 2 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this report.

AFLAC JAPAN

Aflac Japan is the principal contributor to the Parent Company's consolidated earnings and the largest insurer in Japan in terms of cancer and medical (third sector insurance products) policies in force. As of December 31, 2019, Aflac Japan exceeded 24 million individual policies in force in Japan. Aflac Japan continued to be the number one seller of cancer insurance policies in Japan throughout 2019, with more than 15 million cancer policies in force as of December 31, 2019.

Insurance Products

Aflac Japan's third sector insurance products are designed to help consumers pay for medical and nonmedical costs that are not reimbursed under Japan's national health insurance system. Changes in Japan's economy and an aging population have put increasing pressure on Japan's national health care system. As a result, more costs have been shifted to Japanese consumers, who in turn have become increasingly interested in insurance products that help them manage those costs. Aflac Japan has responded to this consumer need by enhancing existing products and developing new products. The focus at Aflac Japan remains on maintaining leadership in third sector insurance products that are less interest rate sensitive and have strong and stable margins. At the same time, Aflac Japan complements this core business with similarly profitable first sector protection products as outlined below.

THIRD SECTOR INSURANCEFIRST SECTOR INSURANCE
Life insurance products include:
Cancer
Protection type:Savings type:
Medical
Term Life
WAYS
Income Support
Whole Life
Child Endowment
GIFT
Cancer InsuranceAflac Japan pioneered the cancer insurance market in Japan in 1974, and remains the number one provider of cancer insurance in Japan today. Aflac Japan's cancer insurance products provide a lump-sum benefit upon initial diagnosis of cancer and fixed daily benefits for subsequent hospitalization and outpatient treatments due to cancer, as well as cancer-related surgical and convalescent care benefits.


3



Medical Insurance Aflac Japan's medical insurance products provide benefits for hospitalization, surgeries and outpatient treatment of various illnesses, as well as lump sum benefits related to three critical illnesses: cancer, heart attack, and stroke.

Income Support Insurance Aflac Japan's Income Support Insurance provides fixed-benefit amounts in the event that a policyholder is unable to work due to significant illness or injury and was developed to supplement the disability coverage within Japan’s social security system.

Whole Life Aflac Japan launched Prepare Smart Whole-Life Insurance in 2018, a whole life insurance product with low cash surrender value, which offers non-smoking policyholders further discounted premiums, and it provides beneficiaries, typically a designated family member, with a pre-determined benefit payment upon the death of the insured.

GIFT GIFT is a term life insurance product that provides a designated family member with a fixed amount of money every month upon a breadwinner’s death or serious disability as family support.

WAYS and Child Endowment Beginning in 2013, Aflac Japan began to curtail sales of WAYS and Child Endowment, first sector savings-type products, due to persistent low interest rates in Japan and, in particular, the relatively large capital commitment required by such products and their lower profitability, in such an environment.

Distribution Channels

Traditional Sales ChannelThis distribution channel includes individual agencies, independent corporate agencies and affiliated corporate agencies. Aflac Japan was represented by more than 9,000 sales agencies at the end of 2019, with more than 109,000 licensed sales associates employed by those agencies, including individual agencies.

BanksConsumers in Japan rely on banks to provide not only traditional bank services, but also as one key source to provide insurance solutions and other services. By the end of 2019, Aflac Japan had agreements with approximately 90% of the total number of banks in Japan to sell its products.

Dai-ichi LifeAflac Japan's alliance with Dai-ichi Life was launched in 2001, and approximately 40,000 Dai-ichi Life representatives offer Aflac's cancer products.

Japan Post GroupAflac Japan's alliance with Japan Post Group was launched in 2008. After the alliance strengthened in 2013, the number of postal outlets of Japan Post Co. Ltd. (JPC) selling Aflac Japan's cancer product increased to more than 20,000 since 2015. Japan Post Insurance Co., Ltd. (JPI) offers Aflac Japan cancer products through its 76 directly managed sales offices. In 2018, the Company’ entered a strategic alliance with Japan Post Holdings Co., Ltd. (Japan Post Holdings), the parent company of Japan Post Co. Ltd (JPC) and Japan Post Insurance Co., Ltd. (JPI). See the "Aflac Japan Segment" subsection of MD&A for more about this alliance.

Daido LifeIn 2013, Aflac Japan and Daido Life Insurance entered into an agreement for Daido to sell Aflac Japan's cancer insurance products specifically to the Hojinkai market, which is an association of small businesses. Currently, Daido also sells Aflac Japan's cancer insurance products to the market in the tax payment association, which is a not-for-profit association for small businesses to support tax related matters.

Competition

The Company competes with other insurance carriers through policyholder service, price, product design and sales efforts, as the number of insurance companies offering stand-alone cancer and medical insurance has more than doubled since the deregulation of the Japan market in 2001. However, basedFor information on Aflac Japan's growth of annualized premiums in force and diversified distribution network,operating results, see the Company does not believe that Aflac Japan's market-leading position has been significantly impacted by increased competition. Furthermore, the Company believes the continued development and maintenance of operating efficiencies will allow Aflac Japan to offer affordable products that appeal to consumers. The Company believes Aflac Japan will remain a leading provider of cancer and medical insurance coverage in Japan, principally due to its experience in the market, well-known brand, low-cost operations, expansive marketing system and product expertise.

Regulation

Financial Services Agency (FSA) The financial and business affairs of Aflac Japan are subject to examination by Japan's FSA. Aflac Japan files annual reports and financial statements for the Japanese insurance operations based on a March 31 fiscal year end, prepared in accordance with Japanese regulatory accounting practices prescribed or permitted by the FSA. Japanese regulatory basis earnings are determined using accounting principles that differ materially from U.S. generally

4



accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP). Capital and surplus of Aflac Japan, based on Japanese regulatory accounting practices, was $7.8 billion at December 31, 2019, compared with $6.4 billion at December 31, 2018. Two FSA regulations applicable to Aflac Japan are outlined below.

Privacy and Cybersecurity
With regard to personal information obtained from policyholders, the insured, or others, Aflac Japan is regulated in Japan by the Act on the Protection of Personal Information (APPI) and guidelines issued by FSA and other governmental authorities. The FSA updated its guidelines regarding cybersecurity in October 2018.

FSA Solvency Standard
The FSA maintains a solvency standard, the solvency margin ratio (SMR), which is used by Japanese regulators to monitor the financial strength of insurance companies. As of December 31, 2019, Aflac Japan's SMR was 1,043%, compared with 965% at December 31, 2018. Aflac Japan's SMR is sensitive to interest rate, credit spread and foreign exchange rate changes. See the Liquidity and Capital ResourcesSegment section of theItem 7. MD&A for a discussion of measures the Company has taken to mitigate the sensitivity of Aflac Japan's SMR.

&A.
Japan Company LawAs abranch of Aflac prior to April 1, 2018, Aflac Japan repatriated a portion of its accumulated earnings, as determined on a Japanese regulatory accounting basis, to Aflac U.S. provided that Aflac Japan had determined that it adequately protected policyholders' interests as measured by its SMR. After the conversion of Aflac Japan to a subsidiary structure on April 1, 2018 and starting in the fourth quarter of 2018, Aflac Japan distributes dividends to the Parent Company. Such dividends are subject to permitted dividend capacity under the Japan Company Law.

Policyholder ProtectionThe Japanese insurance industry has a policyholder protection corporation that provides funds for the policyholders of insolvent insurers. For additional information, see the policyholder protection section of the MD&A.

For additional information regarding Aflac Japan's operations and regulations, see the "Aflac Japan Segment" subsection of MD&A and Notes 2 and 13 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this report.

AFLAC U.S.

The Company designs its U.S. insurance products to provide supplemental coverage for people who already have major medical or primary insurance coverage, as Aflac U.S. insurance policies pay benefits regardless of other insurance. Aflac U.S. products are distributed in the individual and group supplemental insurance markets. Aflac's individual policies are portable, meaning that individuals may retain their full insurance coverage upon separation from employment or affiliation with a group, generally at the same premium. Individual policies are typically guaranteed-renewable for the lifetime of the policyholder (to age 75 for short-term disability policies).

Insurance Products

Cancer
Critical Illness
Vision
Accident
Hospital Indemnity
Life (Term and Whole)
Short-Term Disability
Dental
Aflac Japan's third sector insurance products are supplemental products designed to help consumers pay for medical and nonmedical costs that are not reimbursed under Japan's national health insurance system. Changes in Japan's economy and an aging population have put increasing pressure on Japan's national health care system. As a result, more costs have been shifted to Japanese consumers, who in turn have become increasingly interested in insurance products that help them manage those costs. In addition, since 2020, the pandemic has accelerated digitization and significantly heightened customer awareness of potential financial and health care burdens. Aflac Japan has responded to this consumer need by enhancing existing products and developing new products, such as a nursing care product introduced in 2021 and work leave insurance introduced in 2022. The focus at Aflac Japan remains on maintaining leadership in third sector insurance products that are less interest rate sensitive and have strong and stable margins. At the same time, Aflac Japan complements this core business with similarly profitable first sector protection products as outlined below.

Third Sector Insurance Products

Cancer

Cancer Insurance Aflac U.S.'sJapan pioneered the cancer insurance market in Japan in 1974, and remains the number one provider of cancer insurance in Japan today. Aflac Japan's cancer insurance products provide a lump-sum benefit upon initial diagnosis of cancer and subsequentfixed daily benefits for treatment receivedsubsequent hospitalization and outpatient treatments due to cancer.cancer, as well as cancer-related surgical and convalescent care benefits.

Medical and Other Health

Medical Insurance Aflac Japan's medical insurance products provide benefits for hospitalization, surgeries and outpatient treatment of various illnesses, as well as lump sum benefits related to three critical illnesses: cancer, heart attack, and stroke.

Income Support Insurance Aflac Japan's Income Support Insurance provides fixed-benefit amounts in the event that a policyholder is unable to work due to significant illness or injury.


3


Other

Nursing Care Insurance Aflac Japan's Nursing Care Insurance provides coverage for out-of-pocket costs incurred when receiving public nursing care services.

Work Leave Insurance Aflac Japan’s Work Leave Insurance offers benefits for relatively short-term hospitalization and home care associated with work leave of less than a year. It is a product that meets the growing need for leave benefits, especially for employees of small and medium-sized companies.

First Sector Insurance Products

Life

Protection-Type Life Insurance

Whole Life Aflac Japan launched Prepare Smart Whole-Life Insurance in 2018, a whole life insurance product with low cash surrender value, which offers non-smoking policyholders further discounted premiums, and it provides beneficiaries, typically a designated family member, with a pre-determined benefit payment upon the death of the insured.

GIFT GIFT is a term life insurance product that provides a designated family member with a fixed amount of money every month upon a breadwinner’s death or serious disability as family support.

Savings-Type Life Insurance

WAYS and Child Endowment WAYS is an insurance product which has features that allow policyholders to convert a portion of their life insurance to medical, nursing care or fixed annuity benefits at a predetermined age. Aflac Japan's child endowment insurance product offers a death benefit until a child reaches age 18. This product also pays a lump-sum at the time of the child's entry into high school, as well as an educational annuity for each of the four years during his or her college education. In November 2022, Aflac Japan refreshed its WAYS and Child Endowment products and began to actively promote sales of these products after having curtailed sales of both products beginning in 2013.

Distribution Channels

Traditional Sales ChannelThis distribution channel includes individual agencies, independent corporate agencies and affiliated corporate agencies. Aflac Japan was represented by approximately 7,400 sales agencies at the end of 2022, with approximately 110,000 licensed sales associates employed by those agencies, including individual agencies.

Dai-ichi LifeAflac Japan's alliance with Dai-ichi Life was launched in 2001, and approximately 40,000 Dai-ichi Life representatives offer Aflac's cancer products. Dai-ichi Life is included in Aflac Japan's affiliated corporate agencies distribution channel.

Japan Post GroupAflac Japan's alliance with Japan Post Group, which is included in Aflac Japan's affiliated corporate agencies distribution channel, was launched in 2008. After the alliance strengthened in 2013, the number of postal outlets of Japan Post Co. Ltd. (Japan Post Co.) selling Aflac Japan's cancer product increased to more than 20,000. Japan Post Insurance Co., Ltd. (Japan Post Insurance) offers Aflac Japan cancer products through its 76 directly managed offices. Additionally, in April 2022, approximately 10,000 employees of Japan Post Co. were transferred to Japan Post Insurance. Japan Post Group has informed Aflac Japan that the transferred employees' responsibilities will include sales of Japan Post Insurance products and Aflac Japan cancer products but will not include sales of other financial products. See the "Aflac Japan Segment" subsection of MD&A for more about this alliance.

Daido LifeIn 2013, Aflac Japan and Daido Life Insurance entered into an agreement for Daido to sell Aflac Japan's cancer insurance products specifically to the Hojinkai market, which is an association of small businesses. Currently, Daido also sells Aflac Japan's cancer insurance products to the market in the tax payment association, which is a not-for-profit association for small businesses to support tax related matters. Daido Life is included in Aflac Japan's affiliated corporate agencies distribution channel.



4

BanksConsumers in Japan rely on banks to provide not only traditional bank services, but also as one key source to provide insurance solutions and other services. At December 31, 2022, Aflac Japan had agreements with approximately 90% of the total number of banks in Japan to sell its products.

Competitive Markets

The Company competes with other insurance carriers through policyholder service, price, product design and sales efforts, as the number of insurance companies offering stand-alone cancer and medical insurance has more than doubled since the deregulation of the Japan market in 2001. However, based on Aflac Japan's size of annualized premiums in force and diversified distribution network, the Company believes it is well-positioned to continue to adapt to increased competition. Furthermore, the Company believes the continued development and maintenance of operating efficiencies will allow Aflac Japan to offer affordable products that appeal to consumers. The Company believes Aflac Japan will remain a leading provider of third sector products such as cancer and medical insurance coverage in Japan, principally due to its experience in the market, well-known brand, low-cost operations, expansive marketing system and product expertise.

Government Regulation

Financial Services Agency (FSA) The financial and business affairs of Aflac Japan are subject to examination by Japan's FSA. Aflac Japan files annual and interim reports and financial statements for the Japanese insurance operations based on a March 31 fiscal year end, prepared in accordance with Japanese regulatory accounting practices prescribed or permitted by the FSA. Japanese regulatory basis earnings are determined using accounting principles that differ materially from U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP). For additional information, see Note 13 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Two FSA regulations applicable to Aflac Japan are outlined below.

Privacy and Cybersecurity

With regard to personal information obtained from policyholders, the insured, or others, Aflac Japan is regulated in Japan by the Act on the Protection of Personal Information (APPI) and guidelines issued by FSA and other governmental authorities. The FSA updated its guidelines regarding cybersecurity in February 2022.

FSA Solvency Standard

The FSA maintains a solvency standard, the solvency margin ratio (SMR), which is used by Japanese regulators to monitor the financial strength of insurance companies. Aflac Japan's SMR is sensitive to interest rate, credit spread and foreign exchange rate changes. See the Liquidity and Capital Resources section of Item 7. MD&A for additional information on SMR, including a discussion of measures the Company has taken to mitigate the sensitivity of Aflac Japan's SMR.

Japan Companies ActAflac Japan dividend distributions to the Parent Company are subject to permitted dividend capacity under the Japan Companies Act.

Policyholder ProtectionThe Japanese insurance industry has a policyholder protection corporation that provides funds for the policyholders of insolvent insurers. For additional information, see the policyholder protection section of the MD&A.

For additional information regarding Aflac Japan's operations and regulations, see the "Aflac Japan Segment" subsection of the MD&A and Notes 2 and 13 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this report.

AFLAC U.S.

The Company designs its U.S. insurance products to provide supplemental coverage for people who already have major medical or primary insurance coverage, as Aflac U.S. offers cancer insurance on anpolicies pay benefits regardless of other insurance. Aflac U.S. products are distributed in the individual basis.and group supplemental insurance markets. Aflac's individual policies are portable, meaning that individuals may retain their full insurance coverage upon separation from employment or affiliation with a group, generally at the same premium. Individual policies are typically guaranteed-renewable for the lifetime of the policyholder (to age 75 for short-term disability policies).


5

Insurance Products

Accident

Accident Insurance Aflac U.S. offers accident coverage on both an individual and group basis. These policies pay cash benefits in the event of a covered injury. The accident portion of the policy includes lump-sum benefits for accidental death, dismemberment and specific injuries as well as fixed benefits for hospital confinement. Additional benefits are also available for home modifications, wellness and increased benefits for injuries related to participationsparticipation in an organized sporting activity.

Disability
Short-Term
Disability Insurance Aflac U.S. offers short-term disability benefits on both an individual and group basis and long-term disability benefits on a group basis. The

Critical Care

Cancer InsuranceAflac U.S.'s cancer insurance products provide a lump-sum benefit upon initial diagnosis of cancer and subsequent benefits for treatment received due to cancer. Aflac U.S. offers cancer insurance on an individual short-term disability product offers an Aflac Value Rider that pays a benefit, less claims, for every consecutive five-year term that the policy is in force.basis.

Critical Illness Insurance Aflac U.S. offers coverage for critical illness plans on both an individual and group basis. These policies are designed to pay cash benefits in the event of critical illnesses such as heart attack, stroke or cancer.


Hospital Indemnity
5



Hospital Indemnity Insurance Aflac U.S. offers hospital indemnity coverage on both an individual and group basis. Hospital indemnity products provide policyholders fixed dollar benefits triggered by hospitalization due to accident or sickness. Indemnity benefits for inpatient and outpatient surgeries, as well as various other diagnostic events, are also available. Aflac U.S. also offers a lump sum rider for a range of critical illness events that can be added to its individual accident, short-term disability

Dental and hospital indemnity products.Vision

Dental and Vision Insurance Aflac U.S. now offers network dental and vision products on a group basis. Aflac U.S. offersbasis and fixed-benefit dental coverage on both an individual and group basis. Aflac U.S. offers Vision NowSM,is an individually issued policy which provides fixed benefits for serious eye health conditions and loss of sight as well as coverage for corrective eye materials and exam benefits.

Life

Life (Term and Whole)Insurance Aflac U.S. offers term- and whole-life policies on both an individual and group basis.

Seasonality

In recent years, new annualized premium sales are generally higher in the fourth quarter for Aflac U.S. group business due to the timing of open enrollment for many employers. As a result, approximately half of total new annualized premium sales for Aflac U.S. group business are generated in the fourth quarter, which typically results in over one third of total Aflac U.S. total sales being generated in the fourth quarter.

Distribution Channels

Independent Associates/Career Agents The career agent channel in Aflac U.S. focuses on marketing Aflac to the small business market, defined as employers of between three and 99 employees. Sales associates in the U.S. are independent contractors and are paid commissions and other variable compensation based on first-year and renewal premiums from their sales of insurance products.

Brokers The broker channel of Aflac U.S. focuses on selling to the mid- and large-case market, which is comprised of employers with 100 or more employees and typically an average size of 1,000 employees or more. Brokers in the U.S. are


6

independent contractors and are paid commissions based on first-year and renewal premiums from their sales of insurance products.


Consumer MarketsWhile Aflac U.S. concentrates on marketingprimarily markets its insurance products at the worksite. This method offers policies to individuals through employment, trade and other associations. Aflac U.S. believes that worksite, marketing enables sales associates and brokers to reach a greater number of prospective policyholders and lowers distribution costs, compared with individually marketed business. Aflac U.S. is also expanding its distribution strategy to directly reach consumers outside of the traditional worksite through digital lead generation.

CompetitionCompetitive Markets

Aflac U.S. competes against several supplemental insurance carriers on a national and regional basis. Aflac U.S. believes its policies, premium rates, platforms, value-added services and sales commissions are competitive by product type. Moreover, Aflac U.S. believes that its products are distinct from competitive offerings given its product focus (including features, benefits and claims service model), distribution capabilities and brand awareness. 

Since Aflac products provide an additional level of financial protection for policyholders, the Company believes the increased financial exposure some employees may face creates a favorable opportunity for Aflac U.S. products. However, given the profitability erosion some major medical carriers are facing in their core lines of business, the Company has seen a more competitive landscape as these carriers seek entry into Aflac's supplemental product segments and leverage their core benefit offerings by bundling and discounting products in order to gain market share.

Government Regulation
One Day PaySM is a claims initiative that Aflac U.S. has focused on to process, approve and pay eligible claims in just one day. The Company believes that this claims practice enhances the Aflac U.S. brand reputation and the trust policyholders have in Aflac, and it helps Aflac stand out from competitors.

Regulation

State Insurance Regulation The Parent Company and its U.S. insurance subsidiaries, Aflac, CAIC, TOIC (Nebraska-domiciled insurance companies) and, Aflac New York (a New York-domiciled insurance company) and ABS (a licensed third party administrator in most U.S. jurisdictions and a pre-paid limited health service organization in Florida) are subject to state regulations in the U.S. as an insurance holding company system. Such regulations generally provide that certain transactions between companies within the holding company system must be fair and equitable. In addition, transfers of assets among such affiliated companies, certain dividend payments from insurance subsidiaries and certain transactions between companies within the system, including management fees, loans and advances are subject to prior notice to, or approval by, state regulatory authorities. These laws generally require, among other things, the insurance holding company and each insurance company directly owned by the holding company to register with the insurance departments of their respective domiciliary states and to furnish annually financial and other information about the operations of companies within the holding company system.


6



Like all U.S. insurance companies, Aflac, CAIC, TOIC and Aflac New York CAIC and TOIC are subject to regulation and supervision in the jurisdictions in which they do business. In general, the insurance laws of the various jurisdictions establish supervisory agencies with broad administrative powers relating to, among other things:

granting and revoking licenses to transact business
regulating trade and claims practices
licensing of insurance agents and brokers
approval of policy forms and premium rates
standards of solvency and maintenance of specified policy benefit reserves and minimum loss ratio requirements
capital requirements
limitations on dividends to shareholders
the nature of and limitations on investments
deposits of securities for the benefit of policyholders
filing of financial statements prepared in accordance with statutory insurance accounting practices prescribed or permitted by regulatory authorities
periodic examinations of the market conduct, financial, and other affairs of insurance companies

The insurance laws of Nebraska that govern Aflac's activities provide that the acquisition or change of “control” of a domestic insurer or of any person that controls a domestic insurer cannot be consummated without the prior approval of the Nebraska Department of Insurance (NDOI). A person seeking to acquire control, directly or indirectly, of a domestic insurance company or of any person controlling a domestic insurance company (in the case of Aflac, CAIC and TOIC, the Parent Company) must generally file with the NDOI an application for change of control containing certain information required by statute and published regulations and provide a copy to Aflac. In Nebraska, control is generally presumed to exist if any person, directly or indirectly, acquires 10% or more of an insurance company or of any other person or entity controlling the insurance company. The 10% presumption is not conclusive and control may be found to exist at less than 10%. Similar laws apply in New York, the domiciliary jurisdiction of Aflac's New York insurance subsidiary.



7

State insurance departments conduct periodic examinations of the books and records, financial reporting, policy filings and market conduct of insurance companies domiciled in their states, generally once every three to five years. Examinations are generally carried out in cooperation with the insurance departments of other states under guidelines promulgated by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC). In 2016,2020, the NDOI and New York State Department of Financial Services (NYSDFS) conducted full-scope, risk-focused financial examinations were conducted by the NDOI, New York Department of Financial Services (NYDFS), and the South Carolina Department of Insurance (SCDOI) on their respective state domiciled insurance entities Aflac, Aflac New York, and CAIC, respectively.entities. The examinations covered the reporting period January 1, 2016 – December 31, 2019. There were no material findings contained in the NDOI or NYSDFS final exam reports. CAIC redomiciled to Nebraska asIn 2023, the NYSDFS will commence a routine market conduct examination on Aflac New York of the five-year period ended December 2016 and TOIC redomiciled to Nebraska effective March 11, 2019. The NDOI and NYDFS are scheduled to conduct a full-scope comprehensive financial examination covering years 2016-2019 in 2020.31, 2022.

NAIC Risk-Based Capital The NAIC continually reviews regulatory matters, such as risk-based capital (RBC) modernization, group capital calculations and liquidity risk assessment and principle-based reserving. The NAIC has adopted a valuation manual containing a principle-based approach to calculation of life insurance reserves. The valuation manual became effective January 1, 2017. There is a three-year transition period, beginning January 1, 2017, during which companies can choose on a product by product basis to implement principle-based reserving for new business. The Company anticipates that the adoption of this manual will not cause a material impact on the statutory reserves of Aflac, Aflac New York, CAIC or TOIC.assessment. The NAIC uses an RBC formula relating to insurance risk, business risk, asset risk and interest rate risk to facilitate identification by insurance regulators of inadequately capitalized insurance companies based upon the types and mix of risk inherent in the insurer's operations. The formulas for determining the amount of RBC specify various weighting factors that are applied to financial balances or various levels of activity based on the perceived degree of risk. Regulatory compliance is determined by a ratio of a company's regulatory total adjusted capital to its authorized control level RBC as defined by the NAIC. Companies below specific trigger points or ratios are classified within certain levels, each of which requires specified corrective action. The levels are company action, regulatory action, authorized control, and mandatory control. AsSee Note 13 of December 31, 2019, based on year-end statutory accounting results, Aflac's company action level RBC ratio was 539%. The 2018 RBC as filed is lower than Aflac U.S. stand-alone RBC duethe Notes to the inclusionConsolidated Financial Statements and the Liquidity and Capital Resources section of Aflac JapanMD&A for the first quarter of 2018. The RBC charge reflects the business risk without any total adjusted capital (TAC). Aflac's NAIC RBC ratio remains high and reflects a very strong capital and surplus position.additional information on RBC.

Guaranty Association and Similar Arrangements Under state insurance guaranty association laws and similar laws in international jurisdictions, the Company is subject to assessments, based on the share of business the Company writes in the relevant jurisdiction, for certain obligations of insolvent insurance companies to policyholders and claimants. In the U.S., some states permit member insurers to recover assessments paid through full or partial premium tax offsets. The Company's policy is to accrue assessments when the entity for which the insolvency relates has met its state of domicile's statutory

7



definition of insolvency, the amount of the loss is reasonably estimable and the related premium upon which the assessment is based is written. In most states, the definition is met with a declaration of financial insolvency by a court of competent jurisdiction.

Federal InitiativesRegulation Federal legislation and administrative policies in several areas, including health care reform legislation, financial services reform legislation, securities regulation, pension regulation, privacy, tort reform legislation and taxation, can significantly and adversely affect insurance companies. FederalCertain federal regulations applicable to Aflac U.S. are outlined below.

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA)
The ACA,and the Heath Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (collectively, the ACA), federal health care reform legislation, gave the U.S. federal government direct regulatory authority over the business of health insurance. The reform included major changes to the U.S. health care insurance marketplace. The ACA, as enacted, does not require material changes in the design of the Company's insurance products. However, indirect consequences of, or changes to, the legislation and regulations could present challenges that could potentially have an impact on the Company's sales model, financial condition and results of operations. The U.S. Congress has considered and may continue to consider legislation that would repeal and replace key provisions of the ACA. There can be no assurance that any legislation affecting the ACA will be passed by Congress, nor as to the ultimate timing or provisions of any such legislation, nor as to the effect of any such legislation on the design or marketability of the Company's insurance products. Further, certainCertain provisions of the ACA have been and may continue to be subject to challenge through litigation, the ultimate effects of which on the ACA are uncertain. See the risk factor entitled, "Extensive regulation and changes in legislation can impact profitability and growth" for more information.

Dodd-Frank Act

Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (Dodd-Frank) and regulations issued thereunder, in particular rules to require central clearing for certain types of derivatives, may have an impact on the Company's derivative activity, including activity on behalf of Aflac Japan. In addition, in 2015 and 2016, six U.S. financial regulators, including the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), issued final rules regarding the exchange of initial margin (IM) and variation margin (VM) for uncleared swaps that impose greater obligations on swap dealers regarding uncleared swaps with certain counterparties, such as the Company. The requirements of such rules with respect to IM are currently being phased in and will be fully implemented by September 1, 2020, although an extension to September 1, 2021 is expected for covered entities with an aggregate average notional amount below $50 billion. The margin requirements are expected to result in more stringent collateral requirements and to affect other aspects of the Company's derivative activity.

The Dodd-Frank Act also established a Federal Insurance Office (FIO) under the U.S. Treasury Department to monitor all aspects of the insurance industry and of lines of business other than certain health insurance, certain long-term care insurance and crop insurance. Traditionally, U.S. insurance companies have been regulated primarily by state insurance departments. The FIO does not directly regulate



8

Privacy and Cybersecurity

In the insurance industry, but under Dodd-Frank it has the power to preempt state insurance regulations thatabsence of a comprehensive federal privacy law, states are inconsistent with international agreements reached by the federal government, subject to certain requirements and restrictions. The FIO and certain federal agencies must achieve consensus positions with the state insurance regulators when taking positions on insurance proposals by certain international forums. The President and Congress have stated proposals to reform or repeal certain provisionsmaking a push towards privacy legislation. Personally identifiable information is used in support of many of the Dodd-Frank Act, someCompany's business processes. For many years, the standard for protection and treatment of which have been implemented. The Company cannot predict with any degree of certainty what impact, if any, such proposals might have on Aflac's business, financial condition, or results of operations.

Privacy and Cybersecurity
The collection, maintenance, use, protection, disclosure and disposal of individually identifiablethat data was benchmarked by the Company's businesses are regulated at the international, federal and state levels. These laws and rules are subject to change by legislation or administrative or judicial interpretation. Various state laws address the unauthorized access and acquisition of personal information and the use and disclosure of individually identifiable health data to the extent they are more restrictive than those contained in the privacy and security provisions inof the federal Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 (GLBA) and in the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA). For example,As consumers have grown more concerned about the protection of their data, as well as how their data is used by an organization, many jurisdictions within and outside of the U.S. have created legislation and issued regulations that apply or may in the future apply to aspects of Aflac U.S. operations and allow consumers the right to access, correct, delete and the right to opt out of sales or use of their data. Examples of these types of legislation include the California Consumer Privacy Act became effective January 1, 2020 and requires businesses to provide California consumers rights to access, delete, and restrict certain uses of their personal information. Under the law,(CCPA), the California AttorneyPrivacy Rights Act (CPRA), the UK General may not bring an enforcement action prior to July 1, 2020. HIPAA also requires thatData Protection Regulation (UK GDPR), the Company imposes privacyUK Data Protection Act of 2018 (UK DPA) and security requirements on its business associates (as such term is definedmost recently, going into effect in 2023, the HIPAA regulations)Connecticut Data Privacy Act (CDPA), the Utah Consumer Privacy Act (UCPA), the Virginia Consumer Data Protection Act (VCDPA) and the Colorado Privacy Act (CPA).


Cybersecurity also continues to be an area of evolving focus for U.S. legislation and regulatory activity. In March 2017,Industry regulators as well as the federal government have updated existing standards and increased their focus on enforcement. For example, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) issued enhanced security guidelines of the software supply chain and NYSDFS published increased security guidelines related to ransomware.

The Company has a cross-functional team that tracks and monitors new and emerging legislation and regulations to ensure privacy and cybersecurity regulation issuedprograms are evaluated and comply with regulatory requirements. This includes a robust third party risk management and assessment program. Over the last several years, processes have developed to support the data subject request process required by the NYDFS went into effect that requires covered entities, including Aflac New York,CCPA, privacy impact assessments have been implemented as required by CPRA and a dedicated privacy and security center has been added to maintain an information security program meeting certain security, data disposal, audit, activity

8



monitoring, and data encryption requirements. In October 2017, the NAIC adopted an Insurance Data Security Model Law that may be adopted in whole or in part by U.S. states in which the Company’s subsidiaries are licensed. Other states have adopted and, the Company expects, will continuewebsite to pass legislationprovide consumers with information about the use of and issue regulations related to cybersecurity. The Company anticipates, assesses and if necessary modifies its information security program to accommodate such changes.protection of their data.

For further information concerning Aflac U.S. operations, see the "Aflac U.S. Segment" subsection of the MD&A and Notes 2 and 13 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this report.

CORPORATE AND OTHER

The Company's other operations include the Parent Company, Aflac Global Ventures LLC and its subsidiaries, asset management subsidiaries, results of reinsurance retrocession activities and a printing subsidiary.
Investments of Aflac U.S., as well as certain sub-advised assets of Aflac Japan, are managed by the Company’s U.S. asset management subsidiary, Aflac Asset Management LLC (AAM), and investments of Aflac Japan are managed pursuant to an investment advisory agreement between Aflac Japan and the Company's asset management subsidiary in Japan, Aflac Asset Management Japan Ltd. (AAMJ). AAMJ is licensed as a discretionary asset manager under the Japan Financial Instruments and Exchange Act and is subject to rules of the Japan Investment Advisors Association, a self-regulatory organization with mandatory membership for Japan investment managers. Effective January 19, 2021, AAM is registered with the SEC as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. AAM and AAMJ are reported in Corporate and Other; however, the assets that they manage are reported in the respective Aflac Japan and Aflac U.S. segments.
In 2022, the Company established Aflac Re Bermuda Ltd. (Aflac Re Bermuda), a Bermuda domiciled insurer that reinsures certain policies issued by ALIJ. Aflac Re Bermuda is subject to regulation in Bermuda, where the Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA) has broad administrative powers relating to granting and revoking licenses to transact reinsurance business, approval of specific reinsurance transactions, capital requirements and solvency standards, limitations on dividends to shareholders, the nature of and limitations on investments, and the filing of financial statements in accordance with prescribed or permitted accounting practices.
In 2020, the Company purchased newly issued common stock of Trupanion, Inc., a provider of medical insurance for pets in the United States and Canada, resulting in the Company owning approximately 9% of the outstanding common stock of Trupanion, Inc. The shares were registered for resale and, pursuant to the Shareholder Agreement, subject to certain exceptions, the Company has agreed that it will not transfer its shares of Trupanion, Inc. common stock during a restricted period ending on November 13, 2023. The Company also entered into an alliance agreement with Trupanion, Inc. to sell pet insurance in worksites in the U.S., subject to certain exceptions, and to explore on an exclusive basis potential


9

distribution opportunities for pet insurance in Japan. On November 10, 2022, the Company and Trupanion announced a joint venture between ALIJ and Trupanion to provide pet insurance in Japan.
For additional information on the Company's other operations, see the "Corporate and Other" subsection of the MD&A and Note 8 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
EMPLOYEESHUMAN CAPITAL

The Company’s overarching human capital philosophy is, “If you take care of your employees, your employees will take care of the business.” As of December 31, 2019,2022, Aflac Japan had 6,1786,996 employees, Aflac U.S. had 4,7994,839 employees, and the Company's other operations had 7521,047 employees. The Company's compensation and benefit expense totaled approximately $1.9 billion in 2022, compared with approximately $2.0 billion in 2021. The Company believes its employee relations are generally satisfactory.

Talent

The Company uses internal and external resources to attract, retain and develop talent across a variety of backgrounds and demographics.

Aflac Japan seeks diverse talent through annual recruitment of new university graduates as well as mid-career recruitment of those with specialty skills or expertise. For its employees, Aflac Japan implements standard and unified training and development programs focusing on a range of business skills. For example, Aflac Japan’s Leadership Program allows select managers to participate in a comprehensive training program to learn about innovation and the global business environment. Aflac Japan implemented a human capital management system, beginning in January 2021 with managers and more senior leadership positions and in January 2022 with all other employees. Under the new system, employees have access to descriptions and necessary skills for all job positions across the Company and are able to more proactively design their careers.

Aflac U.S. recruiting efforts include partnerships with colleges and universities, including historically black colleges and universities, and civic organizations to attract diverse talent. Aflac U.S. also offers a variety of internships, co-operative opportunities and transitional programs to allow emerging talent to develop. Educational opportunities are available for self-development and growth to help employees further enhance their technical and professional skills.

Compensation

The Aflac Japan and Aflac U.S. Human Resources divisions operate as centralized internal compensation functions to provide oversight and input to the respective management teams with the objective of providing compensation that is consistent with job scope, duties and responsibilities. The compensation function evaluates new-hire job offers, promotions and compensation adjustments with the goal of consistent and equitable compensation. Defined salary structures are reviewed regularly and updated utilizing market data. Job levels and associated compensation are determined based on annually updated market data, job scope, duties and responsibilities. Employee performance reviews are conducted annually and are factored into employee bonuses and salaries.

Health and Wellness

In 2022, Aflac Japan was certified, for the fifth consecutive year, as one of the top 500 Leading Companies in Health and Productivity Management under the Certified Health & Productivity Management Outstanding Organizations Recognition Program with Japan's Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry. This certification is awarded for best practices in employee health management, strategically focused work style and development of a socially appreciative work environment. Aflac Japan's current certification was in recognition of wide-ranging initiatives including a walking campaign, online seminars focused on improving health literacy, efforts to improve lifestyle habits such as support for smoke-free efforts, promotion of cancer screening, as well as COVID-19 control measures, including flexible working arrangements, workplace environment improvements and vaccination support.

Aflac U.S. Health and Wellness, a training and service program works to enhance organizational health, encourage healthy lifestyles among all U.S. employees, provide diverse wellness programs to meet a wide range of personal health needs, recognize employees for participating in healthier lifestyles activities, and support a positive corporate culture that is focused on celebrating and improving the quality of life for all U.S. employees.

9


10

Diversity, Equity & Inclusion

The Company’s corporate culture reflects its commitment to diversity, equity and inclusion at all levels of the Company. For example:

As of December 31, 2022, women account for 54% of Aflac Japan employees and 33% of those in leadership roles. Women also held 19% of senior management roles. Aflac Japan's goal is to further increase the percentage of women in line manager positions by 2025.

As of December 31, 2022, 49% of Aflac U.S. and the Parent Company employees located in the U.S. were people of color and 66% were women. Women also occupied 50% of leadership roles located in the U.S. and 31% of senior management roles. In 2022, 62% of new hires located in the U.S. were people of color and 69% were women.

Established in 2009, Aflac Heartful Services Co., Ltd. (Aflac Heartful Services), a subsidiary of Aflac Japan, promotes the hiring of employees with disabilities. Aflac Heartful Services has established a barrier-free work environment and provides, among other things, specialized training, specially-trained supervisors and development opportunities to support those with disabilities. Of Aflac Heartful Services’ 154 employees as of December 31, 2022, 124 have a disability. Aflac Heartful Services supports these employees with the assistance of advisors for long-term career support.

Both Aflac Japan and Aflac U.S. have created diversity councils that include employees from various levels that meet regularly to discuss activities and initiatives. The councils are designed to create avenues in which employees can communicate and appreciate one another’s cultural differences.

Women and people of color comprise approximately 64% of the Parent Company’s board of directors.

Employee Engagement and Culture

The Company strives to have an engaged employee culture by developing programs including career development support and programs emphasizing work life balance. Each year, Aflac Japan conducts a human capital engagement survey in which all employees answer questions about the company and their organization to measure engagement across the company and detect organizational issues. The results of the survey are reported to Aflac Japan's Human Capital Management Committee to identify issues, formulate enhancement/improvement measures and implement them. Aflac U.S. provides an employee engagement survey every other year to employees to gather their views on company culture and satisfaction, and works with its leadership to monitor continuous improvements and enhance the employee experience.



11

Information about the Company's Executive Officers
NAME
PRINCIPAL OCCUPATION(1)
AGE
Daniel P. AmosChairman, Aflac Incorporated and Aflac, since 2001; Chief Executive Officer, Aflac Incorporated and Aflac, since 1990; President, Aflac, since 2017;from 2017 until 2018; President, Aflac Incorporated, from 2018 until 20206871 
Koji AriyoshiExecutive Vice President, Director of Sales and Marketing, Aflac Japan, since 201266
Steven K. BeaverSenior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Aflac U.S., since 2019; Senior Vice President, Financial Planning and Analysis, Aflac Incorporated, from 2018 until 2019; Senior Vice President, Global Strategic Projects, Corporate Financial Planning and Analysis, Aflac Incorporated, from 2017 until 2018; Vice President, Deputy Chief Accounting Officer, Tax Department, Aflac Incorporated, from 2015 until 2016; Vice President, Corporate Tax, Aflac Incorporated, from 2012 until 201420185558 
Max K. BrodenBrodénExecutive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Aflac Incorporated, since 2020; SeniorExecutive Vice President, andAflac, since 2020; Treasurer, Aflac, since 2017; Treasurer, Aflac Incorporated from 2017 until 2020;2021; Senior Portfolio Manager, Norges Bank,Vice President, Aflac Incorporated and Aflac, from 20072017 until 201720204144 
Frederick J. CrawfordPresident and Chief Operating Officer, Aflac Incorporated, since 2020; Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Aflac Incorporated, from 2015 until 2020; Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, CNO Financial Group, from 2012 until 201520205659 
J. Todd DanielsExecutive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Aflac Japan, since 2018; Executive Vice President, Global Chief Risk Officer and Chief Actuary, Aflac Incorporated, from 2016 until 2018; Senior201852 
Bradley E. DyslinExecutive Vice President, Global Chief RiskInvestment Officer, and Chief Actuary, Aflac, from 2015 until 2016; Senior Vicesince 2023; President, Aflac Asset Management LLC, since 2023; Deputy Corporate Actuary and Global Chief RiskInvestment Officer, Aflac, from 20142021 until 2015;2023; Senior Vice President, Deputy Corporate Actuary,Managing Director, Global Head of Credit and Strategic Investment Opportunities, Aflac, from 20122017 until 201420214957 
June HowardChief Accounting Officer, Aflac Incorporated and Aflac, since 2010; Senior Vice President, Financial Services, Aflac Incorporated and Aflac, since 2010; Treasurer, Aflac, from 2011 until 201520105356 
Eric M. KirschExecutive Vice President, Global Chief Investment Officer, Aflac, since 2012; President, Aflac Asset Management LLC, since 201759
Masatoshi KoidePresident and Representative Director, Aflac Japan, since 2018; President and Chief Operating Officer, Aflac Japan since 2017; Deputy President, Aflac Japan from 20162017 until 2017; Executive Vice President, Aflac Japan from 2015 until 2016; First Senior Vice President, Aflac Japan, from 2013 until 201520185962 
Charles D. Lake, IIPresident, Aflac International, since 2014; Chairman and Representative Director, Aflac Japan, since 2018; Chairman, Aflac Japan, from 2008 until 20185861 
Virgil R. MillerPresident, Aflac U.S., since 2023; Deputy President, Aflac U.S., from 2022 until 2023; Executive Vice President, President of Group and Individual Benefits Division, Aflac U.S., from 2021 until 2022; Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer, Aflac U.S., from 2018 until 2021; Senior Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer, Aflac U.S., from 2016 until 201854 
Albert A. RiggieriSenior Vice President, Global Chief Risk Officer and Chief Actuary, Aflac Incorporated, since 2018; Senior Vice President, Corporate Actuary, Aflac, from 2016 until 2018; Group Chief Actuary, Unum Group, until 201620186467 
Audrey B. TillmanExecutive Vice President, General Counsel, Aflac Incorporated and Aflac, since 2014; Executive Vice President, Corporate Services, Aflac Incorporated, from 2008 until 20145558 
Teresa L. WhitePresident, Aflac U.S., since 201453
Richard L. Williams Jr.Executive Vice President and Chief Distribution Officer, Aflac since 2017; Senior Vice President and General Manager, Stop Loss, Unum, U.S. in 2017; Senior Vice President, Growth Markets, Colonial Life and Accident Insurance Company from 2013 until 201748
(1)Unless specifically noted, the respective executive officer has held the occupation(s) set forth in the table for at least the last five years. Each executive officer is appointed annually by the board of directors and serves until his or her successor is chosen and qualified, or until his or her death, resignation or removal.

10

12


ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

The Company faces a wide range of risks, and its continued success depends on its ability to identify, prioritize and appropriately manage enterprise risk exposures. Readers should carefully consider each of the following risks and all of the other information set forth in this Form 10-K. These risks and other factors may affect forward-looking statements, including those in this document or made by the Company elsewhere, such as in earnings release webcasts, investor conference presentations or press releases. The risks and uncertainties described herein may not be the only ones facing the Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to the Company or that the Company currently believes to be immaterial may also adversely affect its business. If any of the following risks and uncertainties develops into actual events, there could be a material impact on the Company.
Sales of
Investment and Markets Risk Factors

Difficult conditions in global capital markets and the Company's products and services are dependent on its ability to attract, retain and support a network of qualified sales associates, brokers and employees in the U.S. and sales associates and other distribution partners in Japan.

The Company's sales, results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected if its sales networks deteriorate or if the Company does not adequately provide support, training and education for its existing network of sales associates, brokers, other distribution partners and employees. In the U.S., competition exists for sales associates and brokers with demonstrated ability. In Japan, the Company's sales results are dependent upon its relationship with sales associates and other distribution partners,economy, including its strategic partner, Japan Post.

The Company competes with other insurers and financial institutions primarily on the basis of its products, compensation, support services and financial rating. The Company's sales associates, brokers and other distribution partners are independent contractors and may sell products of its competitors. If the Company's competitors offer products that are more attractive, or pay higher commissions than the Company does, any or all of these distribution partners may concentrate their efforts on selling the Company's competitors' products instead of the Company's. In addition to the Company's commissioned sales force in the U.S., Aflac has expanded its sales leadership team to include a salaried sales force of over 200 market directors and broker sales professionals. The Company's inability to attract and retain qualified sales associates, brokers and other distribution partners, including its alliance partners in Japan,those caused by COVID-19, could have a material adverse effect on the Company's sales,investments, capital position, revenue, profitability, and liquidity and harm the Company's business.

The Company's results of operations are materially affected by conditions in the global capital markets and the global economy generally, including in its two primary operating markets of the U.S. and Japan. Economies globally experienced significant inflation in 2022, with inflation rates and impact varying by country. Central bank and government efforts to control inflation, through reductions in stimulus and asset purchases as well as interest rate increases, have resulted in a decline in economic activity globally. Supply chain issues remaining from the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as geopolitical events, have contributed to inflation and volatility in energy prices. Although some markets have proven resilient in the face of inflation control measures, continued weakening of global financial markets impacts the creditworthiness and value of the Company's existing investment portfolio, influences opportunities for new investments, and may contribute to generally weak economic fundamentals, which can have a negative impact on its results of operations and financial condition.positions.

Additionally,The Company's investments are vulnerable to adverse market developments such as asset price volatility, lack of market liquidity, credit rating downgrades, payment defaults, asset restructurings, increased losses, and other risks. The Company has evaluated its holdings and identified investments in areas such as commercial real estate, including mortgages, consumer discretionary spending, issuers with higher leverage, and emerging markets issuers as the Japanmost exposed to rising interest rates, an economic downturn and U.S. employment marketsthe continuing effects of the COVID-19 global pandemic. These investments are experiencing and may continue to evolve, thereexperience higher credit losses, credit rating downgrades and/or defaults and the Company has examined in each case whether a reduction in size of the holding is appropriate. In addition, volatility in oil prices could have a continued adverse impact on issuers in the energy sector. While the Company has identified assets impacted or expected to be impacted by rising interest rates and economic contraction, other investments not identified to date may also be impacted. The availability of new investments in certain private market asset classes, such as middle market loans, commercial mortgages and transitional real estate, has been and may continue to be limited. While interest rates have increased in the U.S. and other regions, interest rates in Japan remain low, and the difference between U.S. and Japan rates has increased. A prolonged period of low interest rates in other countries, particularly Japan, remains a risk that could result in new investments generating lower yields than in prior periods. The Company may need to adjust its investment strategy and/or be forced to liquidate investments to pay claims. In addition, the increase in the difference between interest rates in the U.S. and Japan contributed to a weakening of the yen over 2022, which had the effect of suppressing the Company's practices regarding attracting, developing,current period results in relation to the comparable prior period. The increase in the difference between U.S. dollar and retaining employees mayyen interest rates also contributes to increasing costs of hedging currency risk of U.S. dollar-denominated investments held by Aflac Japan. The Company is not be fully effective. Failureable to successfully meetpredict the ultimate impact of inflation, interest rate increases, interest rate differences and maintain sufficient levels of employees may diminish the Company's ability to achieve its financial and compliance objectives, both of which are time consuming and personnel-intensive.

For more informationother changing market conditions on the strategic partnership with Japan Post, seeCompany’s investments and hedging programs. See the risk factor below entitled, " Events related“The Company is exposed to the ongoing Japan Post investigation and other matters regarding sales of Japan Post Insurance products could negatively impact the Company’s sales andsignificant interest rate risk, which may adversely affect its results of operations,."

financial condition and liquidity” for more information. See the “Investments” and “Results of Operations by Segment” sections of Item 7, MD&A, for more information.

Events related to the ongoing Japan Post investigation and other matters regarding sales of Japan Post Insurance products could negatively impact the Company’s sales and results of operations

As previously disclosed,the Company holds a significant amount of fixed maturity securities issued by borrowers located in the second half of 2019 and the first quarter of 2020 there have been news reports and public comments regarding improper sales practices relating to sales of JPI products by JPI and JPC, each an affiliate of Japan Post Holdings (together with JPI and JPC, the Japan Post Group). JPC and JPI are important distribution and alliance partnersmany different parts of the Company, whichworld, its financial results are directly influenced by global financial markets. Recent weakness in 2018 collectively accounted for approximately 25% of Aflac Japan’s third sector sales. On July 24, 2019, after such news reports and other public comments, the Japan Post Group announced that they had established a Special Investigative Committee comprised of independent former prosecutors to determine whether JPC and JPI sales practices with respect to JPI products had caused disadvantages to customers holding such policies that were not otherwise the result of honoring such customers’ intentions.

On December 18, 2019, the Japan Post Group issued a release discussing results of the investigation and stating that JPI had identified a number of cases involving potential violation of laws and regulations or internal rules. On the same date, the Japan Post Group stated that it would continue the investigation with a goal of completing it by March 2020. On December 27, 2019, the Japanese FSA issued three-month business suspension orders to JPC and JPI for the sale of JPI insurance products, and the Japan Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications also issued a three-month business suspension order to JPC for the sale of JPI insurance products. Also on December 27, 2019, the Japan Post Group announced the resignation of the chief executives of Japan Post Holdings, JPC and JPI, to be effective January 5, 2020. On January 31,

11



2020, the Japan Post Group announced that its internal investigation had been expanded to additional policyholders and the investigation would continue with a goal of completing it by the end of June 2020. The Japan Post Group stated they could not comment on the expected timing for it to re-initiate sales of JPI insurance products.

Notwithstanding the JPI investigation and the three-month suspension orders promulgated by the FSA and the Japan Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, the sale of Aflac Japan cancer policies has continued through JPC and JPI. However, while the sale of Aflac Japan cancer insurance products is not within the scope of the suspension orders, beginning in August 2019 the Company has experienced a material decrease of sales in the Japan Post Group channel. This decline has continued into 2020. The Company believes that sales of Aflac Japan cancer insurance through JPC and JPI are unlikely to return to 2018 levels in the near term. It is uncertain what long-term effect these developments will have on the Company’s results of operations or financial condition, but any such effects could be material. See the "Aflac Japan Segment" subsection of Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Competitionglobal capital markets could adversely affect the Company's abilityfinancial condition, including its capital position and overall profitability. Market volatility and recessionary pressures could result in significant realized or unrealized losses due to increasesevere price declines driven by increases in interest rates or maintaincredit spreads, defaults in payment of principal or interest, or credit rating downgrades.



13

Japan is the largest market for the Company's insurance products, and the Company owns substantial holdings in Japan Government Bonds (JGBs). Government actions to stimulate the economy affect the value of the Company's existing holdings, its reinvestment rate on new investments in JGBs or other yen-denominated assets, and consumer behavior relative to the Company's suite of insurance products. The additional government debt from fiscal stimulus actions could adversely impact the Japan sovereign credit profile, which could in turn lead to volatility in Japanese capital and currency markets.

Should investors become concerned with any of the Company's investment holdings, including the concentration in JGBs, its access to market sharesources of funding could be negatively impacted. It is possible that lenders or profitability.debt investors may also become concerned if the Company incurs large investment losses or if the level of the Company's business activity decreases due to a market downturn or there are further adverse economic trends in the U.S. or Japan, specifically, or generally in developed markets.

The Company operates in a competitive environmentneeds liquidity to pay its operating expenses, dividends on its common stock, interest on its debt, and in an industry that is subject to ongoing changes from market pressures brought about by customer demands, legislative reform, marketing practicesliabilities. See the "Liquidity and changes to health care and health insurance delivery. These factors requireCapital Resources" Item 7, MD&A, for more information. In the event the Company's current resources do not meet its needs, the Company may need to anticipate market trends and make changes to differentiate the Company's products and services from those of its competitors. The Company also faces the potential of competition from existing or new companies in the U.S. and Japan that have not historically been active in the supplemental health insurance industry, but some of which have greater financial, marketing and management resources than the Company does. Further, some of these potential competitors could introduce new means of product development and delivery that disrupt the Company’s business model. Failure to anticipate market trends and/or to differentiate the Company's products and services can affect the Company's ability to retain or grow profitable lines of business. Further, as employers and brokers are increasingly requesting a full-suite of products from one insurance provider, a failure to react and adapt to these demands could result in decreased sales or market share.

The insurance market is undergoing rapid changes with frequent introductions of new technology-driven products and services.seek additional financing. The Company's future successaccess to additional financing will depend in part, on a variety of factors such as market conditions, the general availability of credit within the financial services industry and its ability to keep pace withcredit rating. See the technological changes and to use technology to satisfy and grow customer demand for the Company's products and services and to create additional efficiencies in its operations. The Company expects that it will need to continue making substantial investments in its technology and information systems to compete effectively and to stay current with technological changes. The Company may not be able to effectively implement new technology-driven products and services or be successful in marketing these products and services to its customers. A failure to meet evolving customer demands through innovative product development, effective distribution channels, and continuous investmentrisk factor below entitled, “Any decrease in the Company's technologyfinancial strength or debt ratings may have an adverse effect on its competitive position and access to liquidity and capital” for more information.

Broad economic factors such as consumer spending, business investment, government spending, the volatility and strength of the capital markets, inflation, and strain with the U.S. supply chain all affect the business and economic environment and, indirectly, the amount and profitability of the Company's business. In an economic downturn characterized by higher unemployment, lower family income, lower corporate earnings, lower business investment and lower consumer spending, the demand for financial and insurance products could be adversely affected. This adverse effect could be particularly significant for companies such as Aflac that distribute supplemental, discretionary insurance products primarily through the worksite in the event that economic conditions result in lower revenuesa decrease in the number of new hires and total employees. Adverse changes in the economy could potentially lead the Company's customers to be less favorableinclined to purchase supplemental insurance coverage or to decide to cancel or modify existing insurance coverage. Further, Aflac U.S. may experience higher rates of policy termslapses during periods of increased job turnover and conditions, whichworkforce mobility within the U.S. economy. The above factors could adversely affect the Company's operating results. As a result, the Company's ability to effectively compete to retain or acquire new business may be impaired, and its business, financial condition or results of operations may be adversely affected.

If future policy benefits, claims or expenses exceed those anticipated in establishingnet earned premiums, and reserves, the Company's financial results would be adversely affected.

The Company establishes premiums for many of its policies on assumptions for morbidity, mortality, longevity and persistency. The Company also establishes and carries, as a liability, reserves based on estimates of how much will be required to pay for future benefits and claims on its policies. The Company calculates these reserves using various assumptions and estimates, including premiums the Company will receive over the assumed life of the policy; the timing, frequency and severity of the events covered by the insurance policy; and the investment returns on the assets the Company purchases with a portion of its net cash flow from operations.

The assumptions and estimates that the Company uses in establishing premiums and reserves depend on the Company's judgment regarding the likelihood of future events and are inherently uncertain. Many factors can cause actual outcomes to deviate from these assumptions and estimates, such as changes in incidence rates, economic conditions, changes in government healthcare policy, advances in medical technology, changes in treatment patterns, and changes in average lifespan. Accordingly, the Company cannot determine with precision the ultimate amounts that it will pay for, or the timing of payment of, actual benefits and claims or whether the assets supporting the policy liabilities will grow to the level the Company assumes prior to payment of benefits or claims. If the Company's actual experience is different from its assumptions or estimates, the Company's reserves may prove inadequate. As a result, the Company would incur a charge to earnings in the period in which it determines such a shortfall exists, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, results of operations and financial condition.


12



Generally, lower mortality decreases the profitability of third sector products in Japan, as more policyholders will survive into ages where they have a higher rate of claim incidence. This assumption can impact pricing and reserving.  For instance, Japan FSA periodically requires updates to their Standard mortality tables for FSA reserves. An update to the Standard mortality tables was performed in April 2018 applicable to all business issued after that date. For business that is inforce prior to the update, the change in mortality table would not have an impact. For new issues, the updated mortality tables would be included in the Company's reserve assumptions, and slow the emergence of FSA earnings for third sector products and therefore will have an impact on pricing returns. The Company adjusts pricing assumptions as new products are developed to adjust for these mortality assumptions. 

The success of the Company's business depends in part on effective information technology systems and on continuing to develop and implement improvements in technology.

The Company's business depends in large part on its technology systems for interacting with employers, policyholders, sales associates, and brokers, and the Company's business strategy involves providing customers with easy-to-use products to meet their needs and ensuring employees have the technology in place to support those needs. Some of the Company's information technology systems and software are older, legacy-type systems that are less efficient and require an ongoing commitment of significant resources to maintain or upgrade to current standards including adequate business continuity procedures. The Company is unable to predict the course of the global financial markets or the recurrence, duration or severity of disruptions in a continual state of upgradingsuch markets.

See the risk factor entitled "Major public health issues, including COVID-19 and enhancing its business systems; however, these changes tend to challengeany resulting or coincidental economic effects, could have an adverse impact on the Company's complex integrated environment. The Company's success is dependent in large part on maintaining or improving the effectivenessfinancial condition and results of existing systemsoperations and continuing to develop and enhance information systems that support its business processes in a cost-efficient manner. If the Company does not maintain the effectivenessother aspects of its systems, the Company's operations and reputation could be adversely affected and it could be exposed to litigation as well as to regulatory proceedings and fines or penalties.business" for more information.

Defaults, downgrades, widening credit spreads or other events impairing the value of the fixed maturity securities and loan receivables in the Company's investment portfolio may reduce the Company's earnings and capital position.

The Company is subject to the risk that the issuers and/or guarantors of fixed maturity securities and loan receivables the Company owns may default on principal or interest. A significant portion of the Company's portfolio represents an unsecured obligation of the issuer, including some that may be subordinated to other debt in the issuer’s capital structure. In these cases, many factors can influence the overall creditworthiness of the issuer and ultimately its ability to service and repay the Company's holdings. This can include changes in the global economy, the company's assets, strategy, or management, shifts in the dynamics of the industries in which they compete, their access to additional funding, and the overall health of the credit markets. Factors unique to the Company's securities including contractual protections such as financial covenants or relative position in the issuer's capital structure also influence the value of the Company's holdings.

Most of the Company's investments carry a rating by one or more of the nationally recognized statistical rating organizationsNationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations (NRSROs or rating agencies). Any change in the rating agencies' approach to evaluating credit and assigning an opinion could negatively impact the fair value of the Company's portfolio. The Company employs a team ofAny expected or sustained credit analysts to monitor the creditworthinessdeterioration of the issuers in its portfolio. Any credit-related declines in the fair value of positions held in the Company's portfolio believed to be not temporary in natureinvestments will negatively impact the Company's net income and capital position through credit impairment and other credit related losses. TheseCredit related losses that are not temporary in nature would also affect the Company's solvency ratios in the U.S. and Japan. Aflac Japan has certain regulatory accounting requirements for realizing impairments that could be triggered by credit-related losses, which may be different from U.S. GAAP and statutory requirements. These impairment losses could negatively impact Aflac Japan's earnings, and the corresponding


14

dividends and capital deployment.

The Company is also subject to the risk that any collateral providing credit enhancement to the Company's positionsinvestments could deteriorate. These instruments may include senior secured first lien loans, such as commercial mortgage loans, bank loans, middle market loans, and loan-backed securities where the underlying loan or collateral notes may default on principal, interest, or other payments, causing an adverse change in cash flows to the positions held in the Company's investment portfolio.

The Company is exposed to sovereign credit risk through instruments issued directly by governments and government entities as well as banks and other institutions that rely in part on the strength of the underlying government for their credit quality. In addition to the U.S. and Japan, many governments, especially in Europe, have been subject to rating downgrades due to the need for fiscal and budgetary remediation and structural reforms, reduced economic activity, and investment needed to support banks or other systemically important entities. Additional downgrades or default of the Company's sovereign issuers will have a negative impact on its portfolio and could reduce the Company's earnings and capital.


13



In addition to the Company's exposure to the underlying fundamental credit strength of the issuers of its fixed maturity securities and the underlying risk of default, the Company is also exposed to the general movement in credit market spreads. A widening of credit spreads could reduce the value of the Company's existing portfolio, create unrealized losses on its investment portfolio, and reduce the Company's adjusted capital position which is used in determiningand/or the SMR in Japan. This wideningdividend capacity of credit spreads could, however, increase the net investment income on new credit investments. Conversely, aCompany's insurance subsidiaries. A tightening of credit spreads could increase the value of the Company's existing portfolio and create unrealized gains on its investment portfolio. This tightening of credit spreads could also reduce the net investment income available to the Company on new credit investments. Increased market volatility also makes it difficult to value certain of the Company's investment holdings (see the Critical Accounting Estimates section in Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis, of this Form 10-K).

holdings. For more information, regarding credit risk, see the Credit Risk"Critical Accounting Estimates" section of Item 7, MD&A, and the "Credit Risk" subsection of Item 7A, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk, of this Form 10-K.Risk.

The Company is exposed to significant interest rate risk, which may adversely affect its results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.

The Company has substantial investment portfolios that support its policy liabilities. Interest rate risk is an inherent portfolio, business and capital risk for the Company, and significant changes in interest rates could have a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated results of operations, financial condition or cash flows through realized losses, impairments, changes in unrealized positions, and liquidity. Changes in interest rates could also result in the Company having to recognize gains or losses because the Company disposes of some or all of its investments prior to their maturity.

The Company's exposure to interest rate risk relates primarily to the ability to invest future cash flows to support the interest rate assumption made at the time the Company's products were priced and the related reserving assumptions were established. Low levels of interest rates on investments experienced in Japan and the U.S. over the last decade have also reduced the level of investment income earned by the Company. TheWhile interest rates currently are rising in the U.S. and other regions, interest rates in Japan remain low, and the Company's overall level of investment income will continue to be negatively impacted in a persistent low-interest-rate environment.from Japan’s low interest rates and from investments made prior to the start of recent rate increases. While the Company generally seeks to maintain a diversified portfolio of fixed-income investments that reflects the cash flow and duration characteristics of the liabilities it supports, the Company may not be able to fully mitigate the interest rate risk of its assets relative to its liabilities. The Company's exposure toProlonged periods of low interest raterates also heighten the risk relates primarily to the ability to investassociated with future cash flows to support theincreases in interest rate assumption made at the timerates because an increasing proportion of the Company's products were priced andinvestment portfolio include investments that bear lower rates of return than the related reserving assumptions were established. embedded book yield of the investment portfolio. A rise in interest rates decreases the fair value of the Company's debt securities.

A sustained decline in interest rates could hinder the Company's ability to earn the returns assumed in the pricing and the reserving for its insurance products at the time they were sold and issued. Due to low interest rates, the Company's ability to earn the returns it expectsissued and may also influence the Company's ability to develop and price attractive new products and could impact its overall sales levels. The Company's first sector products are more interest rate sensitive than third sector products. As discussed in Item 1.1, Business, beginning in 2013, Aflac Japan began to curtail sales of first sector savings-type products due to persistent low interest rates in Japan. The continuing negative interest rate imposed by the Bank of Japan (BoJ) on excess bank reserves could continue to have a negative impact on the distribution and pricing of these products.
A
Conversely and concurrently, a rise in interest rates couldwould improve the Company's ability to earn higher rates of return on future investments, as well as floating rate investments held in its investment portfolio. However, anrising interest rates negatively impact the fair values of the Company's fixed maturity investments which results in reductions to the Company's overall equity. Significant increases in interest rates could cause declines in the values of the Company's investment portfolio which have a secondary impact on the Company's overall evaluation of its deferred tax asset position. An increase in the differential of short-term U.S. and Japan interest rates would also increase the cost of hedging a portion of the U.S. dollar-denominated assets in the Aflac Japan segment into yen, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, results of operations or financial condition. The Company’s floating rate investments typically bear interest based on the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR). Regulatory and industry initiatives to eliminate LIBOR as an interest rate benchmark may create uncertainty in the valuation of LIBOR-based loans, as well as for other LIBOR-based derivatives and assets. This may adversely impact both pricing and liquidity in such instruments. The Company is unable to predict with certainty how LIBOR elimination may impact markets, pricing, liquidity and other factors or the Company's activities.
Changes in interest rates impact unrealized gains and losses of fixed income securities in the Company's investment portfolio; however, they do not have a direct impact on the related valuation of the corresponding liabilities. Prolonged periods of low interest rates, as have been experienced in recent years, heighten the risk associated with future increases in interest rates because an increasing proportion of the Company's investment portfolio includes investments that bear lower rates of return than the embedded book yield of the investment portfolio. A rise in interest rates could decrease the fair value of the Company's debt securities. SomeFurther, some of the insurance products that Aflac sells in the U.S. and Japan provide cash surrender values. Avalues, and a rise in interest rates could trigger significant policy surrenders, which might require the Company to sell investment assets and recognize unrealized losses. This situation is commonly referred to as disintermediation risk. The Company generally invests its assets to match the duration and cash flow characteristics of its policy liabilities, and therefore would not expect to realize most of these gains or losses, however, the Company's risk is that unforeseen events or economic conditions, such as changes in interest rates resulting from governmental monetary policies, domestic and international economic and political conditions, and other factors beyond the Company's control will reduce the effectiveness of this strategy. These events or economic conditions could either cause the Company to dispose of some or all of these investments prior to their maturity, or increase the risk that the issuers of these securities may default or may require impairment, which could result in the Company having to recognize such gains or losses.

14



Rising interest rates also negatively impact the SMR sincecapital ratios in certain jurisdictions because unrealized losses on the available-for-sale investment portfolio factor into the ratio. In addition to the unrealized losses negatively impacting capital ratios, significant unrealized losses could impact the amount of dividends that could be paid under local regulations, including in Japan. For Aflac Japan, rising interest rates and widening credit spreads, which go to reduce the fair value of Aflac Japan’s fixed-maturity investments, when combined with a strengthening yen, and the resulting decrease in the yen value of Aflac Japan’s U.S. dollar-denominated fixed-maturity investments, have a negative impact to SMR.For regulatory accounting purposes for Aflac Japan, there are also certain requirements for realizing impairments that could be triggered


15

by rising interest rates, negatively impacting Aflac Japan's regulatory earnings and corresponding dividends and capital deployment.
Further,
The Company’s floating rate investments typically bear interest based on the U.S. Dollar (USD) London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), although the Company’s more recent loan acquisitions bear interest based on the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR). Investments bearing interest based on LIBOR are expected to transition to a rate based on SOFR or another reference rate prior to the USD LIBOR cessation date of June 30, 2023. The upcoming cessation of USD LIBOR as an interest rate riskbenchmark may create uncertainty in the valuation of USD LIBOR-based loans, derivatives, and other financial contracts. The Company is still an inherent portfolio, businessunable to predict with certainty how the upcoming cessation of USD LIBOR may impact markets, pricing, liquidity and capital risk for the Company, and significant changes in interest rates could have a material adverse effect onother factors or the Company's consolidated resultsactivities.

See the "Interest Rate Risk" subsection of operations, financial condition or cash flows through realized losses, impairments, changes in unrealized positions,Item 7A, Quantitative and liquidity.Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk for more information.

For more information regarding interest rate risk, see the Interest Rate Risk subsection within the Market Risks of Financial Instruments section of MD&A in this report.

The Company's concentration of business in Japan poses risks to its operations.operations and financial condition.

The Company's operations in Japan, including realizednet investment gains and losses on Aflac Japan's investment portfolio, accounted for 69% of the Company's total revenues in 2019,2022, compared with 69% in 2021 and 70%68% in both 2018 and 2017.2020. The Japanese operations accounted for 83%80% of the Company's total assets at December 31, 2019,2022, compared with 84%82% at December 31, 2018.2021.

Any potential deterioration in Japan's credit quality or access to markets, the overall economy of Japan, or an increase in Japanese market volatility could adversely impact Aflac Japan's operations and its financial condition and thereby Aflac's overall financial performance. Further, because of the concentration of the Company's business in Japan and its need for long-dated yen-denominated assets, the Company has a substantial concentration of Japan Government Bond (JGBs)JGBs in its investment portfolio. As suchportfolio exposing the Company has material exposure to credit deterioration and potential downgrades of JGBs. See the Japanese economy, geo-political climate, political regime,risk factor entitled “Any decrease in the Company's financial strength or debt ratings may have an adverse effect on its competitive position and other factors that generally determine a country's creditworthiness. Specifically, the NRSROs, credit rating agencies registered with the SEC, have placed increased scrutiny on JGBs, which are a significant component of the Company’s overall investment portfolio, resulting in downgrades as discussed later in this Risk Factors section. access to liquidity and capital” for more information.

The Company seeks to match investment currency and interest rate risk to its yen liabilities. The low level of interest rates available on yen-denominated securities has a negative effect on overall net investment income. A large portion of the cash available for reinvestment each year is deployed in yen-denominated instruments and subject to the low level of yen interest rates.

Any potential deterioration in Japan's credit quality, market access, the overall economy of Japan, or Japanese market volatility could adversely impact the business of Aflac in general and specifically Aflac Japan and its related results of operations and financial condition.

Lack of availability of acceptable yen-denominated investments could adversely affect the Company's results of operations, financial position or liquidity.

The Company attemptsaims to match both the duration and currency of its assets with its liabilities. This is very difficult for Aflac Japan due to the lack of available long-dated yen-denominated fixed income instruments beyond JGBs.

Prior to the onset of the financial crisis of 2008, the Company was focused on investing cash flows in JGBs, which had relatively low yields, and utilizing private placement and perpetual securities to gain additional yield, extend the duration of the investment portfolio, and maintain yen exposure. Given call activity with respect to certain of the Company's legacy private placement investments, the Company has added a modest amount of yen-denominated private placements to its investment portfolio in recent periods. The investment in private placements carries risk associated with illiquidity, which is managed and monitored by the Company.

Starting in 2012, Aflac Japan augmented itsJapan’s investment strategy to includeincludes U.S. dollar-denominated investments somefor which a portion of which could then be hedged back to yen. Initially thisdollar currency risk is mitigated by entering into currency hedges. This program focused onincludes public investment-grade bonds but has evolved over time to includeas well as U.S. dollar-denominated investment-grade commercial mortgage loans, middle market loans, infrastructure debt, as well ascollateralized loan obligations and other loan types, high yield bond and public and private equities. The Company plans to continue adding other instruments denominated in U.S. dollars, including floating rate investments, to improve the portfolio diversification and/or return profile. Some of the U.S. dollar-denominated asset classes that the Company has added, and anticipates continuing to add, have less liquidity than investment-grade corporate bonds. Further, in recent years the Company has reduced the proportion of U.S. dollar-denominated investments that are subject to a currency hedge, and this proportion continues to be subject to change at the Company’s discretion. These strategies will continue to increase the Company's exposure to U.S. interest rates, credit spreads and other risks. The Company has increased foreign exchangeU.S. dollar risk exposure in Japan as the comprehensive hedging program may not always correlate to the underlying U.S. dollar-denominated assets, thereby increasing earnings volatility. These risks can significantly impact the Company's consolidated results of operations, financial position or liquidity.


15



Investing in U.S. dollar-denominated investments in Aflac Japan also creates an unmatched foreign currency exposure and related SMRcapital ratio volatility, as Aflac Japan’s insurance liabilities are yen-denominated. Although the Company engages in certain foreign exchange hedging activities to partially mitigate this risk, and such hedged assets may be used to satisfy yen-denominated insurance liabilities and other business obligations, important risks remain.

Foreign exchange derivatives used for hedging are periodically settled, which results in cash receipt or payment at maturity or early termination. Cumulative net cash settlements on derivatives hedging currency exposure of Aflac Japan's


16

U.S. dollar-denominated investments are associated with existing U.S. dollar-denominated investments that continue to be hedged, previously hedged investments that continue to be held but are no longer hedged, as well as,and investments previously hedged that have since been sold, matured or redeemed and may or may not have not been converted to yen. The Company’s foreign exchange derivatives are typically shorter-dated than the underlying U.S. dollar-denominated investments being hedged, which creates roll-over risks within the hedging program that could increase the cost of such derivatives. If the Company reduces the notional amount of foreign exchange derivatives prior to the maturity of the hedged U.S. dollar-denominated investments, the foreign exchange gains or losses on the U.S. dollar-denominated investments remain economically unrealized. These foreign currency gains or losses on the investments are only economically realized, or monetized,, through sale,, maturity or redemption of the investments and concurrent conversion to yen. However, the Company may not realize the benefit of offsetting adverse cash settlements on hedging derivatives with cash receipts on the U.S. dollar-denominated investments if the currency exchange rates move in an adverse direction before the investments are converted to yen, or if the investments are never converted to yen. As an example of the latter, if the Company’s actual insurance risk experience in Japan is as expected or more favorable than expected, the need for yen to pay expenses and claims would correspondingly remain at or below expected levels, thereby diminishing operational requirements to convert U.S. dollar-denominated investments to yen. The settlement of the foreign exchange derivatives is reported in the investing activities section of the Company’s consolidated statements of cash flows in the line item “Settlement of derivatives, net.”


For more information regarding unhedged U.S. dollar-denominated securities, seeSee the risk factor entitled “The Company is exposed to foreign currency fluctuations in the yen/dollar exchange rate.” For more information regarding Aflac Japan's U.S. dollar-denominated investments and hedging activities, seerate”, the "Hedging Activities"subsection within theof Item 7, MD&A, of this report, and for more information regarding foreign currency risk, see the "Currency Risk" subsection within theof Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk section in this report.for more information.

If the Company fails to comply with restrictions on customer privacy and information security, including taking steps to ensure that its third-party service providers and business associates who access, store, process or transmit sensitive customer information maintain its security, integrity, confidentiality and availability, the Company's reputation and business operations could be materially adversely affected.

The collection, maintenance, use, protection, disclosure and disposal of individually identifiable data by the Company's businesses are regulated at the international, federal and state levels. These laws and rules are subject to change by legislation or administrative or judicial interpretation. Various state laws address the unauthorized access and acquisition of personal information and the use and disclosure of individually identifiable health data to the extent they are more restrictive than those contained in the privacy and security provisions in the federal GLBA and in the HIPAA. HIPAA also requires that the Company imposes privacy and security requirements on its business associates (as such term is defined in the HIPAA regulations). With regard to personal information obtained from policyholders, the insured, or others, Aflac Japan is regulated in Japan by the APPI and guidelines issued by FSA and other governmental authorities.

The Company relies on third parties, and in some cases subcontractors, to provide information technology and data services. It also relies on various parties in its distribution channels including agencies, banks and Japan Post in Japan, as well as sales associates and brokers in the U.S., to provide services to prospective and existing customers. Although the Company provides for appropriate protections through its contracts and performs information security risk assessments of its third-party service providers and business associates, the Company still has limited control over their actions and practices. In addition, despite the security measures the Company has in place to ensure compliance with applicable laws and rules, the Company's facilities and systems, and those of the Company's third-party providers and participants in its distribution channels may be vulnerable to security breaches, acts of vandalism or theft, computer viruses, misplaced or lost data, programming and/or human errors or other similar events. From time to time, the Company, its third party providers and participants in the Company’s distribution channels have experienced and will likely continue to experience such events. In such cases, notification to affected individuals, state and federal regulators, state attorneys general and media may be required, depending upon the number of affected individuals and whether personal information including health or financial data was subject to unauthorized access.

The U.S. Congress and many states are considering new privacy and security requirements that would apply to the Company's business. Compliance with new privacy and security laws, requirements, and new regulations may result in cost

16



increases due to necessary systems changes, new limitations or constraints on the Company's business models, the development of new administrative processes, and the effects of potential noncompliance by the Company's business associates. They also may impose further restrictions on the Company's collection, disclosure and use of customer identifiable data that are housed in one or more of the Company's administrative databases. Noncompliance with any privacy laws or any security breach involving the misappropriation, loss, theft or other unauthorized disclosure of sensitive or confidential customer information, whether by the Company or by one of its third parties, could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, reputation, brand and results of operations, including: material fines and penalties; compensatory, special, punitive and statutory damages; consent orders regarding the Company's privacy and security practices; adverse actions against the Company's licenses to do business; and injunctive relief.

In addition, under Japanese laws and regulations, including the APPI, if a leak or loss of personal information by Aflac Japan or its business associates should occur, depending on factors such as the volume of personal data involved and the likelihood of other secondary damage, Aflac Japan may be required to file reports to the FSA; issue public releases explaining such incident to the public; or become subject to an FSA business improvement order, which could pose a risk to the Company's reputation.

Interruption in telecommunication, information technology and other operational systems, or a failure to maintain the security, confidentiality, integrity or privacy of sensitive data residing on such systems, could harm the Company's business.

The Company stores confidential policyholder, employee, agent, and other proprietary information on its information technology systems. In addition, the Company depends heavily on its telecommunication, information technology and other operational systems and on the integrity and timeliness of data it uses to run its businesses and service its customers. These systems may fail to operate properly or become disabled as a result of events or circumstances wholly or partly beyond the Company's control. Additionally, design flaws may exist in certain systems, processes, software, or configurations that in turn may result in system failure, data corruption, or compromise. Despite the Company's implementation of a variety of security measures to defend against threats incurred on a daily basis, its information technology and other systems, as well as those of third party providers and participants in the Company’s distribution channels, have been and will likely continue to be subject to physical or electronic break-ins, unauthorized tampering, security breaches or other cyber-attacks, that may result in the failure to adequately maintain the security, confidentiality, integrity, or privacy of sensitive data, including personal information relating to customers and prospective customers, or in the misappropriation of the Company's intellectual property or proprietary information.

From time to time, the Company, its third party providers and participants in the Company’s distribution channels have experienced and will likely continue to experience such events. Although the minor data leakage issues the Company has experienced to date have not had a material effect on its business, there is no assurance that the Company's security systems or processes will prevent or mitigate future break-ins, tampering, security breaches or other cyber-attacks. Interruption in telecommunication, information technology and other operational systems, or a failure to maintain the security, confidentiality or privacy of sensitive data residing on such systems, whether due to actions by the Company or others, including third party providers and participants in the company’s distribution channels, could delay or disrupt the Company's ability to do business and service its customers, seriously harm the Company's brand and reputation as well as the Company's ability to compete effectively, subject it to regulatory sanctions and other claims, lead to a loss of customers and revenues and otherwise adversely affect the Company's business. In addition, the costs to address or remediate system interruptions or security threats and vulnerabilities, whether before or after an incident, could be significant.

While the Company continues to invest in the infrastructure of its data security programs, the Company, as well as its third party providers and participants in the Company’s distribution channels, have been, and will likely continue to be, the target of unauthorized access, social engineering, phishing, cyber-attacks, web application attacks, computer viruses or other malicious codes, or other computer-related penetrations. Although the Company attempts to manage its exposure to such events through the purchase of cyber liability insurance, such events are inherently unpredictable and insurance may not be sufficient to protect the Company against all losses. As a result, events such as these could adversely affect the Company's financial condition or results of operation.


17



Catastrophic events could adversely affect the Company's financial condition and results of operations as well as the availability of the Company’s infrastructure and systems.

The Company's insurance operations are exposed to the risk of catastrophic events including, but not necessarily limited to, epidemics, pandemics, tornadoes, hurricanes, earthquakes, tsunamis, war or other military action, and terrorism or other acts of violence. The extent of losses from a catastrophe is a function of both the total amount of insured exposure in the area affected by the event and the severity of the event. Certain events such as earthquakes, tsunamis, hurricanes and man-made catastrophes could cause substantial damage or loss of life in larger areas, especially those that are heavily populated. Claims resulting from natural or man−made catastrophic events could cause substantial volatility in the Company's financial results for any fiscal quarter or year and could materially reduce its profitability or harm the Company's financial condition, as well as affect its ability to write new business.

Additionally, the Company's business operations may be adversely affected by such catastrophic events to the extent they disrupt the Company's physical infrastructure, human resources or systems that support its businesses and customers. Although the Company has a global crisis management framework to minimize the business disruption from a catastrophic event, such framework may not be effective to avoid an adverse impact to the Company from such an event.

Difficult conditions in global capital markets and the economy could have a material adverse effect on the Company's investments, capital position, revenue, profitability, and liquidity and harm the Company's business.
The Company's results of operations are materially affected by conditions in the global capital markets and the global economy generally, including in its two primary operating markets of the U.S. and Japan. Weak global financial markets impact the value of the Company's existing investment portfolio, influence opportunities for new investments, and may contribute to generally weak economic fundamentals, which can have a negative impact on its operating activities.

In recent years, global capital markets have been severely impacted by several major events. The financial crisis that began in the latter part of 2008 saw dramatic declines in investment values and weak economic conditions as the global financial system came under extreme pressure. Although U.S. markets began recovering in late 2009 and 2010, Europe continued to struggle under a severely weakened banking system and investor concerns with sovereign debt levels. Following a period of unprecedented intervention by governments and central banks, including the U.S. Federal Reserve and European Central Bank (ECB), financial conditions improved from the dire conditions of the global financial crisis, global recession, and European debt crisis. More recently, global markets have experienced bouts of volatility due to uncertainty surrounding a British exit from the European Union, Japan’s continued recovery amidst assorted policy changes, volatility in global commodity prices including oil, divergent monetary policies in the U.S. versus many other developed economies, heightened concerns surrounding the Chinese economy and increasing protectionism in U.S. foreign trade policy. While capital and market conditions have been generally favorable in the last year, the prospect for increased volatility remains.

A shift in the global trading policies by the U.S. and subsequent trade conflict with China has raised concerns about a slowdown of the Chinese economy and the recent trade agreement between the U.S. and China left tariffs in place and many trade issues unresolved. In addition, the recent trade agreement between the U.S. and Japan resulted in tariff reductions on some products but left tariffs on other products in place. While it is not expected that the Company's products would be directly impacted by tariffs, any resulting economic downturn could adversely affect the Company.

Activity by the government of North Korea in 2018 was the subject of increasing focus for a number of other governments, including those of the U.S. and Japan. Although hostile rhetoric decreased in 2019, there is a possibility of renewed hostility between their governments. In addition, in January 2020, hostility between the government of the U.S. and the government of Iran increased, ultimately culminating in a number of missile strikes. Such activity and related geopolitical risk could have a significant impact on financial market conditions across the world. Under certain circumstances, government actions taken in response to these or similar situations could have a material impact on the Company's operations and financial performance, including the indirect impact of potentially severe and prolonged capital market volatility and disruption.

As the Company holds a significant amount of fixed maturity securities issued by borrowers located in many different parts of the world, including a large portion issued by banks and financial institutions, sovereigns, and other corporate borrowers in the U.S. and Europe, its financial results are directly influenced by global financial markets. A retrenchment of the recent strength of the capital markets could adversely affect the Company's financial condition, including its capital position and overall profitability. Market volatility and recessionary pressures could result in significant realized or unrealized losses due to severe price declines driven by increases in interest rates or credit spreads, defaults in payment of principal or interest, or credit rating downgrades.


18



Following the election of Shinzo Abe as Prime Minister of Japan in December 2012, the new administration adopted a new set of financial measures to stimulate the Japanese economy, including imposing negative interest rates on excess bank reserves. In December 2014 and October 2017 snap-elections, the ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) won decisive victories further strengthening Mr. Abe's ability to continue with economic reforms and address key policy challenges. In September 2018, Mr. Abe won reelection to another three-year term as president of the LDP. Most recently, the BoJ signaled to hold its policy rate at zero and to continue yield curve control to maintain a targeted yield on the 10-year JGB. Prime Minister Abe’s election victories may result in the continuation of current monetary policy, but there can be no guarantee that this is the case.

Japan is the largest market for the Company's products, and the Company owns substantial holdings in JGBs. Government actions to stimulate the economy affect the value of the Company's existing holdings, its reinvestment rate on new investments in JGBs or other yen-denominated assets, and consumer behavior relative to the Company's suite of products. The additional government debt from fiscal stimulus actions could adversely impact the Japan sovereign credit profile, which could in turn lead to volatility in Japanese capital and currency markets.

The Company's investment portfolio has sizeable credit positions in many other geographic areas of the world including the Middle East, Latin America, Asia, and other emerging markets. Deterioration in their underlying economies, sovereign credit worthiness, or financial market conditions could negatively impact the Company's financial position.

While the Company has continued to add floating rate investments to its investment portfolio, most of its investment portfolio holdings are income-producing bonds that provide a fixed level of income. Many of the Company's investments were made at the relatively low level of interest rates prevailing over the last decade. Any increase in the market yields of the Company's holdings due to an increase in interest rates could create substantial unrealized losses in the Company's portfolio, as discussed further in a separate risk factor in this section of the Form 10-K.

The Company needs liquidity to pay its operating expenses, dividends on its common stock, interest on its debt, and liabilities. For a further description of the Company's liquidity needs, including maturing indebtedness, see the Liquidity and Capital Resources section of MD&A in this report. In the event the Company's current resources do not meet its needs, the Company may need to seek additional financing. The Company's access to additional funding will depend on a variety of factors such as market conditions, the general availability of credit to the financial services industry and its credit rating.

Should investors become concerned with any of the Company's investment holdings, including the concentration in JGBs, its access to market sources of funding could be negatively impacted. There is a possibility that lenders or debt investors may also become concerned if the Company incurs large investment losses or if the level of the Company's business activity decreases due to a market downturn or there are further adverse economic trends in the U.S. or Japan, specifically, or generally in developed markets. Similarly, the Company's access to funds may be impaired if regulatory authorities or rating agencies take negative actions. See more information on recent rating actions later in this Risk Factors section.

Broad economic factors such as consumer spending, business investment, government spending, the volatility and strength of the capital markets, and inflation all affect the business and economic environment and, indirectly, the amount and profitability of the Company's business. In an economic downturn characterized by higher unemployment, lower family income, lower corporate earnings, lower business investment and lower consumer spending, the demand for financial and insurance products could be adversely affected. This adverse effect could be particularly significant for companies such as Aflac that distribute supplemental, discretionary insurance products primarily through the worksite in the event that economic conditions result in a decrease in the number of new hires and total employees. Adverse changes in the economy could potentially lead the Company's customers to be less inclined to purchase supplemental insurance coverage or to decide to cancel or modify existing insurance coverage, which could adversely affect the Company's premium revenue, results of operations and financial condition. The Company is unable to predict the course of the global financial markets or the recurrence, duration or severity of disruptions in such markets.

Events, including those external to the Company's operations, could damage the Company's reputation.

The Company has made significant investments in the Aflac brand over a long period of time. Because insurance products are intangible, the Company's ability to compete for and maintain policyholders relies to a large extent on consumer trust in the Company's business, including its alliance partners, sales associates and other distribution partners. The perception of unfavorable business practices or financial weakness with respect to the Company, its alliance partners, sales associates or other distribution partners could create doubt regarding the Company's ability to honor the commitments it has made to its policyholders. Such a perception could also negatively impact the Company’s ability to attract and retain qualified sales associates, brokers and other distribution partners, including its alliance partners in Japan, and could have a material adverse effect on the Company's sales, results of operations and financial condition. Maintaining the Company's stature as a trustworthy

19



insurer and responsible corporate citizen, which helps support the strength of the Company's brand, is critical to the Company's reputation and the failure or perceived failure to do so could adversely affect the Company's brand value, financial condition and results of operations. For example, negative publicity or allegations of unfavorable business practices or poor governance can be rapidly and widely shared over social or traditional media or other means, and could reduce demand for the Company's insurance products, reduce the Company's ability to recruit and retain employees, or lead to greater regulatory scrutiny of the Company's operations.

Extensive regulation and changes in legislation can impact profitability and growth.

Aflac's insurance subsidiaries are subject to complex laws and regulations that are administered and enforced by a number of governmental authorities, including the FSA and Ministry of Finance (MOF) in Japan, and state insurance regulators, the SEC, the NAIC, the FIO, the U.S. Department of Justice, state attorneys general, the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, and the U.S. Treasury, including the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), in the U.S., each of which exercises a degree of interpretive latitude. In addition, proposals regarding the global regulation of insurance are under discussion, and changes to corporate form that attend the conversion of Aflac Japan to a subsidiary may introduce new forms of regulation compared to those with which the Company has historically been subject. For example, AAMJ is licensed as a discretionary asset manager under the Japan Financial Instruments and Exchange Act and is subject to rules of the Japan Investment Advisors Association, a self-regulatory organization with mandatory membership for Japan investment managers. Consequently, the Company is subject to the risk that compliance with any particular regulator's or enforcement authority's interpretation of a legal or regulatory issue may not result in compliance with another regulator's or enforcement authority's interpretation of the same issue, particularly when compliance is judged in hindsight. There is also a risk that any particular regulator's or enforcement authority's interpretation of a legal or regulatory issue may change over time to the Company's detriment. In addition, changes in the overall legal or regulatory environment may, even absent any particular regulator's or enforcement authority's interpretation of an issue changing, cause us to change the Company's views regarding the actions the Company needs to take from a legal or regulatory risk management perspective, thus necessitating changes to the Company's practices that may, in some cases, limit its ability to grow or otherwise negatively impact the profitability of the Company's business.

The primary purpose of insurance company regulatory supervision is the protection of insurance policyholders, rather than investors. The extent of regulation varies, but generally is governed by state statutes in the U.S. and by the FSA and the MOF in Japan. These systems of supervision and regulation cover, among other things:

standards of establishing and setting premium rates and the approval thereof
standards of minimum capital and reserve requirements and solvency margins, including RBC measures
restrictions on, limitations on and required approval of certain transactions between the Company's insurance subsidiaries and their affiliates, including management fee arrangements
restrictions on the nature, quality and concentration of investments
restrictions on the types of terms and conditions that the Company can include in the insurance policies offered by its primary insurance operations
limitations on the amount of dividends that insurance subsidiaries can pay
the existence and licensing status of a company under circumstances where it is not writing new or renewal business
certain required methods of accounting
reserves for unearned premiums, losses and other purposes
assignment of residual market business and potential assessments for the provision of funds necessary for the settlement of covered claims under certain policies provided by impaired, insolvent or failed insurance companies
administrative practices requirements
imposition of fines and other sanctions
Regulatory authorities periodically re-examine existing laws and regulations applicable to insurance companies and their products. Changes in these laws and regulations, or in interpretations thereof, could have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition and results of operations. If the Company's subsidiaries fail to meet the minimum capital or operational requirements established by its respective regulators, they could be subject to examination or corrective action, or the Company's financial strength ratings could be downgraded, or both.

Compliance with applicable laws and regulations is time consuming and personnel-intensive, and changes in these laws and regulations may materially increase the Company's direct and indirect compliance and other expenses of doing business, thus having a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition and results of operations.


20



The Companyis exposed to foreign currency fluctuations in the yen/dollar exchange rate.

Due to the size of Aflac Japan, where functional currency is the Japanese yen, fluctuations in the exchange rate of exchange between the yen and the U.S. dollar can have a significant effect on the Company's reported financial position and results of operations. Aflac Japan's premiums and approximately halfa significant portion of its investment income are received in yen, and its claims and mostalmost all expenses are paid in yen. Aflac Japan purchases yen-denominated assets and U.S. dollar-denominated assets, which may be hedged to yen, to support yen-denominated policy liabilities. TheseCertain unhedged U.S. dollar denominated assets and otherliabilities held by Aflac Japan are re-measured to yen with the volatility reported in earnings. Furthermore, the yen-denominated financial statement items are, however,balance sheet of Aflac Japan is translated into U.S. dollars for financial reporting purposes.purposes with foreign exchange impact reflected in equity. Accordingly, fluctuations in the yen/dollar exchange rate can have a significant effect on the Company's reported financial position and results of operations. In periods when yen weakens, translating yen into U.S. dollars causes fewer U.S. dollars to be reported. When yen strengthens, translating yen into U.S. dollars causes more U.S. dollars to be reported. Any unrealized foreign currency translation adjustments are reported in accumulated other comprehensive income. As a result, yenYen weakening has the effect of suppressing current year results in relation to the prior year, while yen strengthening has the effect of magnifying current year results in relation to the prior year. In addition, the weakening of the yen relative to the U.S. dollar will generally adversely affect the value of the Company's yen-denominated investments in U.S. dollar terms.

The Company engages in certain foreign currency hedging activities for the purpose of hedging When the yen exposurestrengthens in relation to its net investmentthe U.S. dollar, the yen value of Aflac Japan's unhedged U.S. dollar-denominated investments decreases, resulting in operationsa decrease in Japan. These hedging activities are limited in scope, and the Company cannot provide assurance that these activities will be effective.

UnhedgedSMR. Further, unhedged U.S. dollar-denominated securities held by Aflac Japan are exposed to foreign exchange fluctuations, which also impact SMR. In periods of yen strengthening, the unhedged U.S. dollar-denominated investments will experience unrealized foreign exchange losses, negatively impacting SMR. This impact increases when the size of the unhedged U.S. dollar-denominated portfolio increases, which can occur due to the purchase of additional unhedged U.S. dollar-denominated investments, or through termination or expiration of existing hedges. Unrealized currency gains and losses on unhedged U.S. dollar-denominated securities are monetized (or, in other words, are economically realized) only upon converting the proceeds from the sale, maturity or redemption of these securities to yen, which primarily occurs when yen are needed to satisfy policyholder obligations or other business expenses of Aflac Japan. To mitigate exposure to the foreign exchange risk from U.S. dollar-denominated investments and to reduce SMR volatility, the Company engages in certain currency hedging activities. However, these hedging activities are limited in scope and the Company cannot provide assurance that its hedging strategies will be effective. As a result, periods of unusually volatile currency exchange rates could result in limitations on dividends available to the Parent Company.

The Company engages in certain foreign currency hedging activities to hedge the exposure to yen from its net investment in Japanese operations. These hedging activities are limited in scope, and the Company cannot provide assurance that these activities will be effective. In addition, an increase in the difference between short-term U.S. and Japan interest rates would increase the cost of hedging a portion of the U.S. dollar-denominated assets in the Aflac Japan segment into yen, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, results of operations or financial condition. As indicated in the MD&A, the Company has determined that the unhedged U.S. dollar-denominated investment portfolio acts as a natural economic currency hedge of a portion of the Company’s investment in Aflac Japan against erosion of economic value. However,At the same time, the unhedged U.S. dollar-denominated investment portfolio at the same time creates an unmatched foreign currency exposure and subjects Aflac Japan to volatility in regulatory capital, including SMR, and earnings, which may adversely impact Aflac Japan’s ability to pay dividends to the Parent Company. The overall investment strategy in Aflac Japan is guided primarily by the objective of securing the long-term financial strength of Aflac Japan and funding of yen liabilities. As a result, the Company has historically maintained and currently maintains the size of the unhedged portfolio at levels below the economic equity surplus in Aflac Japan. However,Japan, but there can be no assurance that this strategy will be successful.

Furthermore, forFor regulatory accounting purposes, there are certain requirements for realizing impairments that could be triggered by changes in the rate of exchange between the yen and U.S. dollar and could negatively impact Aflac Japan's earnings and the corresponding dividends and capital deployment.

Additionally, the Company is exposed to currency risk when yen cash flows are converted into U.S. dollars, resulting in an increase or decreasechanges in the Company's U.S. dollar-denominated cash flows and earnings when exchange gains or losses,


17

respectively, are realized. This primarily occurs when the CompanyAflac Japan pays dividends funds from Aflac Japanin yen to the Parent Company, but it also has an impact when cash in the form of yen is converted to U.S. dollars for investment into U.S. dollar-denominated assets. The exchange rates prevailing at the time of dividend payment may differ from the exchange rates prevailing at the time the yen profits were earned. In 2018, theThe Parent Company began entering intoutilizes forward contracts to accomplish a dual objective of hedging foreign currency exchange rate risk related to dividend payments by Aflac Japan, and reducing enterprise-wide hedge costs. IfHowever, if the markets experience a significant strengthening of yen, this could cause cash strain at the Parent Company as a result of cash collateral and potentially cash settlement requirements. Based on the timing and severity of exchange rate fluctuations combined with the level of outstanding activity in this program, the cash strain at the Parent Company could be significant.

For more information regarding unhedged U.S. dollar-denominated securities, see the risk factor belowabove entitled, “Lack of availability of acceptable yen-denominated investments could adversely affect the Company’s results of operations, financial

21



position or liquidity”. ForSee the "Currency Risk" subsection of Item 7A, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk for more information regardinginformation.

The valuation of the Company's investments and derivatives includes methodologies, estimations and assumptions that are subject to differing interpretations and could result in changes to investment valuations that may adversely affect the Company's results of operations or financial condition.

The Company reports a significant amount of its fixed maturity securities and other financial instruments at fair value. As such, valuations may include inputs and assumptions that are less observable or require greater estimation and valuation methods that are more sophisticated, thereby resulting in values that may be greater or less than the value at which the investments may be ultimately sold. Rapidly changing and unprecedented credit and equity market conditions could materially impact the valuation of securities as reported within the Company's consolidated financial statements and the period-to-period changes in value could vary significantly.

Valuations of the Company's derivatives fluctuate with changes in underlying market variables, such as interest rates and foreign currency risk, seeexchange rates. During periods of market turbulence created by political instability, economic uncertainty, government interventions or other factors, the Currency Risk subsection withinCompany may experience significant changes in the Market Risksvolatility of Financial Instruments sectionits derivative valuations. Extreme market conditions can also affect the liquidity of MD&A.

Tax rates applicablesuch instruments creating marked differences in transaction levels and counterparty valuations. Depending on the severity and direction of the movements in its derivative valuations, the Company will face increases in the amount of collateral required to be posted with its counterparties. Liquidity stresses to the Company may change.also occur if the required collateral amounts increase significantly over a very short period of time. Conversely, the Company may be exposed to an increase in counterparty credit risk for short periods of time while calling collateral from its counterparties.

Where valuation and interest rates are based on USD LIBOR, the upcoming cessation of USD LIBOR as an interest rate benchmark may create uncertainty in valuation of USD LIBOR-based loans, derivatives and other financial contracts in the pricing of such assets in markets for their sale and disposition.

See the "Critical Accounting Estimates" section of Item 7, MD&A, and Notes 1, 3, 4, and 5 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information.

The determination of the amount of expected credit losses recorded on the Company's investments is based on significant valuation judgments and could materially impact its results of operations or financial position.

The Company is subject to taxation in Japan,estimates an expected lifetime credit loss on investments measured at amortized cost including held-to-maturity fixed maturity securities, loan receivables and inloan commitments. For the U.S. under federal and numerous state and local tax jurisdictions. In preparing the Company's financial statements,Company’s available-for-sale fixed maturity securities, the Company estimatesevaluates estimated credit losses only when the amount of tax that will become payable, but the Company's effective tax rate may be different than estimates due to numerous factors including accounting for income taxes, the mix of earnings from Japan and the U.S., the results of tax audits, adjustments to thefair value of uncertain tax positions, changesthe available-for-sale fixed maturity security is below its amortized cost basis.

The Company’s approach to estimatesestimating credit losses is complex and other factors. Further, changes in U.S. or Japan tax laws or interpretations of such laws could increase the Company's corporate taxes and reduce earnings.

incorporates significant judgments. In addition to a security, or an asset class, or issuer-specific credit fundamentals, it remains difficult to predict the timingconsiders relevant historical information (e.g. loss statistics), current market conditions and effect that future tax law changes could have onreasonable and supportable micro and macroeconomic forecasts. The Company's management updates its expected credit loss assumptions regularly as conditions change and as new information becomes available and reflects expected credit losses in the Company's earnings bothwhen considered necessary. Furthermore, additional credit losses may need to be taken in the future. Historical trends may not be indicative of future expectations of credit losses. See Note 3 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this report for more information.



18

The Company cannot provide assurance that these evaluations will be accurate and effective. If the Company’s estimates of credit losses are not accurate and actual credit losses are higher than the Company’s estimates, the Company’s net income and capital position will be negatively impacted. These higher losses would also negatively affect the Company's solvency ratios in the U.S. and Japan.

For regulatory accounting purposes for Aflac Japan, there are certain requirements for realizing impairments that could be triggered by rising interest rates, credit-related losses, or changes in foreign jurisdictions. exchange, negatively impacting Aflac Japan's earnings and corresponding dividend and capital deployment.

Any of these factors could cause the Company to experience an effective tax rate significantly different from previous periods or the Company's current estimates. If the Company's effective tax rate were to increase,decrease in the Company's financial conditionstrength or debt ratings may have an adverse effect on its competitive position and access to liquidity and capital.

NRSROs may change their ratings or outlook on an insurer's ratings due to a variety of factors including but not limited to competitive position; profitability; cash generation and other sources of liquidity; capital levels; quality of the investment portfolio; and perception of management capabilities. The ratings assigned to the Company by the NRSROs are important factors in the Company's ability to access liquidity and capital from the bank market, debt capital markets or other available sources, such as reinsurance transactions. Downgrades of the Company's credit ratings could give its derivative counterparties the right to require early termination of derivatives transactions or delivery of additional collateral, thereby adversely affecting the Company's liquidity.

Downgrades of the Company's ratings could also have a material adverse effect on agent recruiting and retention, sales, competitiveness and the marketability of its products, all of which could negatively impact the Company's liquidity, operating results of operationsand financial condition. Additionally, sales through the bank channel in Japan could be adversely affected.affected as a result of their reliance on and sensitivity to ratings levels.

The Company cannot predict what actions rating agencies may take, or what actions the Company may take in response to the actions of rating agencies. As with other companies in the financial services industry, the Company's ratings could be downgraded at any time and without any notice by any NRSRO.

A decline in the creditworthiness of other financial institutions could adversely affect the Company.

The Company has exposure to and routinely executes transactions with counterparties in the financial services industry, including broker dealers, derivative counterparties, commercial banks and other institutions.

The Company uses derivative instruments to mitigate various risks associated with its investment portfolio, notes payable, and subsidiary dividends. The Company enters into a variety of agreements involving assorted instruments including foreign currency forward contracts; foreign currency options; foreign currency swaps; and interest rate swaps and swaptions. The Company'sCompany's use of derivatives results in financial exposure to derivative counterparties. If the Company's counterparties fail or refuse to honor their obligations under derivative instruments, the Company's hedges of the risks will be ineffective, and the Company's financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.

The Company engages in derivative transactions directly with affiliates and unaffiliated third parties under International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. (ISDA) agreements and other documentation. Most of the ISDA agreements also include Credit Support Annexes (CSAs) provisions, which generally provide for two-way collateral postings at the first dollar of exposure. The Company mitigates the risk that counterparties to transactions might be unable to fulfill their contractual obligations by monitoring counterparty credit exposure and collateral value while generally requiring that collateral be posted at the outset of the transaction. In addition, a significant portion of the derivative transactions have provisions that give the counterparty the right to terminate the transaction upon a downgrade of Aflac’s financial strength rating. The actual amount of payments that the Company could be required to make depends on market conditions, the fair value of outstanding affected transactions, and other factors prevailing at and after the time of the downgrade. If the Company is required to post collateral to support derivative contracts and/or pay cash to settle the contracts at maturity, the Company's liquidity could be strained. In addition, the Company's cleared swaps result in counterparty exposure to clearing brokers and central clearinghouses; while this exposure is mitigated in part by clearinghouse and clearing broker capital and regulation, no assurance can be provided that these counterparties will fulfill their obligations. The Company also has exposure to counterparties to securities lending transactions in the event they fail to return loaned securities. The Company is also exposed to the risk that there may be a decline in value of securities posted as collateral for securities lending programs or a decline in value of investments made with cash posted as collateral for such programs.

Further, the Company has agreements with various Japanese financial institutions for the distribution of its insurance products. For example, at December 31, 2019,2022, the Company had agreements with 367359 banks to market Aflac's products in Japan. Sales through these banks represented 4.3%4.0% of Aflac Japan's new annualized premium sales in 2019.2022. Any material adverse effect on these or other financial institutions could also have an adverse effect on the Company's sales.

The Company has entered into significant reinsurance transactions with large, highly rated counterparties.counterparties, including affiliates. In addition, Aflac Japan has entered into a reinsurance transaction with Aflac Re Bermuda. (For additional


19

information on this transaction, see Note 16 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.) Aflac Re Bermuda is a newly formed entity with less capital than external counterparties with which the Company has conducted reinsurance transactions in the past. Negative events or developments affecting any one of these counterparties could have an adverse effect on the Company's financial position or results of operations.

All of these risks related to exposure to other financial institutions could adversely impact the Company's consolidated results of operations and financial condition.


The concentration of the Company's investment portfolios in any particular single-issuer or sector of the economy may have an adverse effect on the Company's financial position or results of operations.
22



The determinationMajor public health issues, including COVID-19 and any resulting or coincidental economic effects, could have an adverse impact on the Company's financial condition and results of operations and other aspects of its business.

Due to the evolving nature of the amountCOVID-19 pandemic, the COVID-19 pandemic and any resulting or coincidental economic effects could continue to impact the Company's business, financial condition, results of impairments takenoperations, capital position, liquidity or prospects in a number of ways. The pandemic may cause changes to estimates of future earnings, capital deployment and other guidance the Company has provided to the markets in the "2023 Outlook" section of Item 7, MD&A.

Policies issued by Aflac Japan and Aflac U.S. are primarily sold and enrolled in person through face-to-face interaction. Likewise, recruiting of new agents and brokers largely occurs through in-person contact. The ability of individual agents and agencies, strategic alliance partners, brokers and other distribution partners to make sales in Japan and the U.S. and the ability to conduct agent and broker recruiting has been reduced by efforts to mitigate the effects of the pandemic, and by cultural and workplace changes that were caused by or are coincidental with the pandemic and may be long-term in nature, including social distancing techniques and remote working by employees. These efforts and changes may hinder sales of the Company’s products in Japan and the U.S. The Company cannot predict with certainty the continuing impact of these events on its distribution channels and financial results, but the impact to date has varied between Aflac Japan and Aflac U.S. For example, most Aflac U.S. business customers, and most of the independent agents in its agency channel, are small businesses who may lack the financial resources to weather an economic downturn and may be disproportionately negatively impacted by the economic uncertainty surrounding COVID-19. These factors may continue to negatively impact sales beyond 2022. See the risk factors entitled “Sales of the Company's products and services are dependent on its ability to attract, retain and support a network of qualified sales associates, brokers and employees in the U.S. and sales associates and other distribution partners in Japan” and “Difficult conditions in global capital markets and the economy, including those caused by COVID-19, could have a material adverse effect on the Company's investments, capital position, revenue, profitability, and liquidity and harm the Company's business” for more information.

Further, the Company's operations, as well as those of its vendors, service providers and counterparties, may also be adversely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic or the mitigation efforts and cultural and workplace changes outlined above. During 2022, the Company implemented return to work plans for Aflac Japan and Aflac U.S. that are adaptable and based upon multiple factors including government orders, guidelines issued by public health authorities, the location and job responsibilities of specific Company personnel, rates of COVID-19 vaccinations, cases and deaths in various localities and other factors. The Company may nevertheless experience operational disruptions.

The assumptions and estimates that the Company uses in establishing premiums and reserves depend on the Company's judgment regarding the likelihood of future events and are inherently uncertain, including without limitation in regard to the effects of COVID-19. See the risk factor entitled “If future policy benefits, claims or expenses exceed those anticipated in establishing premiums and reserves, the Company's financial results would be adversely affected” and the "Executive Summary" section of Item 7, MD&A, for more information.



20

For more information on the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on markets and investments, see the risk factor entitled, “Difficult conditions in global capital markets and the economy, including those caused by COVID-19, could have a material adverse effect on the Company's investments, capital position, revenue, profitability, and liquidity and harm the Company's business.”

Sales of the Company's products and services are dependent on its ability to attract, retain and support a network of qualified sales associates, brokers and employees in the U.S. and sales associates and other distribution partners in Japan.

The Company's sales, results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected if its sales networks deteriorate or if the Company does not adequately provide support, training and education for its existing network of sales associates, brokers, other distribution partners and employees. In the U.S., competition exists for sales associates and brokers with demonstrated ability. Further, low rates of unemployment, such as those currently reflected in the U.S. employment market, tend to make it more difficult for Aflac U.S. to maintain its network of sales associates. In Japan, the Company's sales results are dependent upon its relationship with sales associates and other distribution partners, including Japan Post Group. Sales of Aflac Japan cancer products in the Japan Post Group channel experienced a material decline beginning in August 2019. While Japan Post Group resumed proactive sales of cancer insurance policies on April 1, 2021 and the Company anticipates a gradual improvement of cancer insurance sales through the Japan Post Group channel over the intermediate term, the Company can provide no assurance regarding the ultimate timing or extent of any recovery in such sales. It is baseduncertain what long-term effect these developments will have on significant valuation judgments and could materially impact itsthe Company’s results of operations or financial position.condition, but any such effects could be material. See the "Aflac Japan Segment" section of Item 7. MD&A for more information.
An investment in a fixed maturity security is impaired if the fair value falls below book value.
The Company regularly reviewscompetes with other insurers and financial institutions primarily on the basis of its entire investment portfolio for declines in value.products, compensation, support services and financial rating. The majorityCompany's sales associates, brokers and other distribution partners are independent contractors and may sell products of its competitors. If the Company's competitors offer products that are more attractive, or pay higher commissions than the Company does, any or all of these distribution partners may concentrate their efforts on selling the Company's competitors' products instead of the Company's investments are evaluated for other-than-temporary impairment usingCompany's. In addition to the Company's debt impairment model.
commissioned sales force in the U.S., Aflac has expanded its sales leadership team to include a salaried sales force of over 200 market directors and broker sales professionals. The Company's debt impairment model includes emphasis on the ultimate collection of the cash flows frominability to attract and retain qualified sales associates, brokers and other distribution partners, including its investments. The determination of the amount of impairments under this model is based upon the Company's periodic evaluation and assessment of known and inherent risks associated with the respective securities. Such evaluations and assessments are revised as conditions change and new information becomes available.
For the Company's fixed maturity securities reportedalliance partners in the available-for-sale portfolio, the Company reports the investments at fair value in the statement of financial condition and records any unrealized gain or loss in the value of the asset in accumulated other comprehensive income. For the Company's held-to-maturity securities portfolio, the Company reports the investments at amortized cost. Under the debt impairment model, the determination of whether an impairment in value is other than temporary is based largelyJapan, could have a material adverse effect on the Company's evaluationsales, results of operations and financial condition.

Additionally, as the Japan and U.S. employment markets continue to evolve, there is risk that the Company's practices regarding attracting, developing, and retaining employees may not be fully effective. Employees may leave the Company or choose other employers over the Company due to various factors, including a competitive labor market. Although Aflac U.S. has not experienced any material labor shortage to date, it has experienced elevated levels of workforce turnover and there has been an overall tightening of, and increased competition within, the U.S. labor market. These conditions, together with higher levels of inflation may result in increased operating expenses. A sustained labor shortage or continuing increased turnover rates within the Aflac U.S. workforce, due to labor market factors or the state of the issuerU.S. economy, could lead to increased costs of the day-to-day operation of the Aflac U.S. business, the inability to hire and retain employees, or the outsourcing of certain operations. Failure to successfully meet and maintain sufficient levels of employees may diminish the Company's ability to achieve its financial and compliance objectives, both of which are time consuming and personnel-intensive.

If future policy benefits, claims or expenses exceed those anticipated in establishing premiums and reserves, the Company's financial results would be adversely affected.
'
s creditworthiness.
The assumptions and estimates that the Company must apply considerableuses in establishing premiums and reserves depend on the Company's judgment in determiningregarding the likelihood of the security recoveringfuture events and are inherently uncertain. Many factors can cause actual outcomes to deviate from these assumptions and estimates, such as changes in value whileincidence rates, economic conditions, changes in government healthcare policy, advances in medical technology, changes in treatment patterns, and changes in average lifespan. Accordingly, the Company owns it. Factorscannot determine with precision the ultimate amounts that may influence this includeit will pay for, or the timing of payment of, actual benefits and claims or whether the assets supporting the policy liabilities will grow to the level the Company assumes prior to payment of benefits or claims. If the Company's assessment ofactual experience is different from its assumptions or estimates, the issuer’s ability to continue making timely payments of interestCompany's premiums and principal, the overall level of interest rates and credit spreads, and other factors. The Company also verifies whether it has the intent to sell or if it is more likely than notreserves may prove inadequate. As a result, the Company would be requiredincur a charge to sell the security prior to recovery of its amortized cost. If the Company determines it is unlikely to recover the book value of the instrument prior to disposal of the security, the Company will reduce the carrying value of the security to its fair value and recognize any associated impairment lossearnings in the Company's consolidated statement of earnings or other comprehensive income, depending on the nature of the loss.
For regulatory accounting purposes for Aflac Japan, there are certain requirements for realizing impairments that could be triggered by rising interest rates, credit-related losses, or changesperiod in foreign exchange, negatively impacting Aflac Japan's earnings and corresponding dividend and capital deployment.
The Company's management updates its evaluations regularly as conditions change and as new information becomes available and reflects impairment losses in the Company's income statement when considered necessary. Furthermore, additional impairments may need to be taken in the future. Historical trends may not be indicative of future impairments.

U.S. tax audit risk related to conversion of the Japan branch to a subsidiary could adversely impact the Company's financial position.

The conversion of the Japan branch to a legal subsidiary, which the Company executed in the second quarter of 2018, was a complex, tax-free transaction that is conditioned on the continued validity of a private letter ruling the Company received from the IRS. Notwithstanding the receipt of the private letter ruling, the IRS could determine that the Japan branch conversion should be treated as a taxable transaction. For example, the IRS could conclude that the representations, assumptions and covenants on which the private letter ruling is based are untrue, not accurate, or have not been fulfilled. If the IRS madeit determines such a conclusion, the Company could incur significant U.S. federal income tax liabilities or litigation costs to defend the tax-free treatment of the transaction outlined by the private letter ruling. Such liabilities or costsshortfall exists, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, results of operations and financial condition.



21

The success of the Company's business depends in part on effective information technology systems, on continuing to develop and implement improvements in technology, and on successful execution of revenue growth and expense management initiatives.

The Company's business depends in large part on its technology systems for interacting with employers, policyholders, sales associates, and brokers, and the Company's business strategy involves providing customers with easy-to-use products to meet their needs and ensuring employees have the technology in place to support those needs. Some of the Company's information technology systems and software are older, legacy-type systems that are less efficient and require an ongoing commitment of significant resources to maintain or upgrade to current standards including adequate business continuity procedures. As such, the Company is investing in technology and other capabilities to continuously enhance its customer experience, while also seeking to increase efficiencies. The Company is also developing new and innovative products and enhancing existing products. The Company will continue to incur expenses related to, among other things, investments in digital capabilities and product innovation. Further, the Company’s long-term strategy depends on successful operational execution and its ability to execute on its transformational initiatives, including investments in technology and other initiatives intended to grow revenue and control expenses, combined with its ability to achieve efficiencies and attract and retain personnel. If the Company does not maintain the effectiveness of its systems and continue to develop and enhance information systems that support its business processes in a cost-efficient manner, the Company's sales, business retention, operations and reputation could be adversely affected and it could be exposed to litigation, regulatory proceedings and fines or penalties.

Interruption in telecommunication, information technology and other operational systems, or a failure to maintain the security, confidentiality, integrity or privacy of sensitive data residing on such systems, could harm the Company's business.

The Company stores confidential policyholder, employee, agent, broker, and other proprietary information on its information technology systems. The Company also depends heavily on its telecommunication, information technology and other operational systems and on the integrity and timeliness of data it uses to run its businesses and service its customers. The Company’s information technology and other systems, as well as those of third party providers and participants in the Company’s distribution channels, have been and will likely continue to be subject to physical or electronic break-ins, unauthorized tampering, security breaches, social engineering, phishing, web application attacks, computer viruses or other malicious codes, or other cyber-related attacks, that may result in the failure to adequately maintain the security, confidentiality, integrity, or privacy of sensitive data, including personal information relating to customers and prospective customers, or in the misappropriation of the Company's intellectual property or proprietary information. The risk of a cyber incident impacting business operations has grown as third parties continue to develop new and highly sophisticated methods of attack. The Company and its third-parties or vendors have and may continue to experience outages or cyberattacks that disrupt the operations or impact the confidentiality, availability or integrity of information, which may result in operational, legal, regulatory or financial harm. Furthermore, depending upon the type of attack, it could impact the confidentiality, integrity and/or availability of IT systems and data, disrupting business operations and resulting in the loss of consumer confidence. Although the Company attempts to manage its exposure to such events through the purchase of cyber liability insurance, such events are inherently unpredictable, and insurance may not be sufficient to protect the Company against all losses. As a result, events such as these could adversely affect the Company's financial condition or results of operation. Although the minor data leakage issues the Company has experienced to date have not had a material effect on its business, there is no assurance that the Company's security systems or processes will prevent or mitigate future break-ins, tampering, security breaches or other cyber-related attacks. As the Company pursues IT transformation and increased cloud adoption, it inherently exposes the Company to potential cyber related attacks.

Interruption in telecommunication, information technology and other operational systems, or a failure to maintain the security, confidentiality or privacy of sensitive data residing on such systems, whether due to actions by the Company or others, including third party providers and participants in the company’s distribution channels, could delay or disrupt the Company's ability to do business and service its customers, seriously harm the Company's brand, reputation, and ability to compete effectively, subject it to regulatory sanctions and other claims, lead to a loss of customers and revenues and otherwise adversely affect the Company's business. In addition, the costs to address or remediate system interruptions or security threats and vulnerabilities, whether before or after an incident, could be significant.

As a holding company, the Parent Company depends on the ability of its subsidiaries to transfer funds to it to meet its debt service and other obligations and to pay dividends on its common stock.

The Parent Company is a holding company and has no direct operations, and its most significant assets are the stock of its subsidiaries. Because the Parent Company conducts its operations through its operating subsidiaries, the Parent


22

Company depends on those entities for dividends and other payments to generate the funds necessary to meet its debt service and other obligations, to pay dividends on and conduct repurchases of its common stock, and to make investments into its subsidiaries or external investment opportunities.

Aflac is domiciled in Nebraska and is subject to insurance regulations that impose certain limitations and restrictions on payments of dividends, management fees, loans and advances by Aflac to the Parent Company. The Nebraska insurance statutes require prior approval for dividend distributions that exceed the greater of the net income from operations, which excludes net realized investment gains, for the previous year determined under statutory accounting principles, or 10% of statutory capital and surplus as of the previous year-end. In addition, theThe Nebraska insurance department also must approve

23



service arrangements and other transactions within the affiliated group of companies. After the Japan branch conversion, the Nebraska insurance department and the FSA approved their respective domiciled insurance company service arrangements and transactions. The FSA does not allow dividends or other payments from Aflac Japan unless it meets certain financial criteria as governed by Japanese corporate law. Under these criteria, dividend capacity at the Japan subsidiary will be defined as retained earnings plus other capital reserve less net after-tax net unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities.

The ability of Aflac and Aflac Japan to pay dividends or make other payments to the Parent Company could also be constrained by the Company's dependency on financial strength ratings from independent rating agencies. The Company's ratings from these agencies depend to a large extent on Aflac's capitalization level. Any inability of Aflac to pay dividends or make other payments to the Parent Company could have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition and results of operations.

For the foregoing reasons, there is no assurance that the earnings from, or other available assets of, the Parent Company's operating subsidiaries will be sufficient to make distributions to enable the Company to operate.
Any decrease in the Company's financial strength or debt ratings may have an adverse effect on its competitive position and access to liquidity and capital.

Financial strength ratings can play an important role in establishing the competitive position of insurance companies. On an ongoing basis, NRSROs review the financial performance and condition of many insurers, including the Company and its competitors. They may assign multiple ratings including a financial strength rating, reflecting their view of the insurer’s ability to pay claims on a timely basis, and ratings on an insurer’s senior and subordinated debt obligations, indicating their view of an insurer’s ability to make timely payments on their debt obligations.

NRSROs may change their ratings or outlook on an insurer's ratings due to a variety of factors including the NRSRO’s assessment of the insurer’s strength of operations and overall financial condition. Some factors that may influence ratings include competitive position; profitability; cash generation and other sources of liquidity; capital levels; quality of the investment portfolio; and perception of management capabilities. The ratings assigned to the Company by the NRSROs are important factors in the Company's ability to access liquidity and capital from the bank market, debt capital markets or other available sources, such as reinsurance transactions. Downgrades to the Company's credit ratings could give its derivative counterparties the right to require early termination of derivatives transactions or delivery of additional collateral, thereby adversely affecting the Company's liquidity.

In view of the difficulties experienced after the financial crisis by many financial institutions, including those in the insurance industry, the NRSROs have heightened the level of scrutiny that they apply to such institutions. Steps taken by the NRSROs include an increase in the frequency and scope of their reviews, additional information requests from the companies that they rate, including additional information regarding the valuation of investment securities held, and, in certain cases, an increase in the capital and other requirements employed in their models for maintenance of certain rating levels.

On September 16, 2015, S&P downgraded their credit rating of Japan’s sovereign debt. Following this action, they also downgraded several other foreign insurers, including the Company. The Company's significant operations in Japan and corresponding regulation by the Japanese FSA, combined with its significant exposure to JGBs as outlined above, resulted in S&P downgrading the financial strength rating of Aflac's core insurance operations to A+ and the Parent Company's senior debt rating to A-, both with a stable outlook. While S&P made no further downgrades to the Company's ratings between 2016 and 2019, they state that a downgrade of Japan's sovereign rating could lead to a downgrade of the Company's financial strength rating. As a matter of policy, S&P rarely rates insurance companies above the sovereign long-term rating of the country of domicile because during times of stress, the sovereign’s regulatory and supervisory powers may restrict an insurer’s or financial system’s flexibility. Moody’s has also stated that the following factors could lead to a downgrade of the Company’s ratings: a downgrade of the U.S. or Japanese operating entities; or a downgrade of the Government of Japan sovereign debt rating.

In addition to the impact on the Company's access to liquidity, as mentioned above, a downgrade of the Company's ratings could have a material adverse effect on agent recruiting and retention, sales, competitiveness and the marketability of its products which could negatively impact the Company's liquidity, operating results and financial condition. Additionally, sales through the bank channel in Japan could be adversely affected as a result of their reliance and sensitivity to ratings levels.


24



The Company cannot predict what actions rating agencies may take, or what actions the Company may take in response to the actions of rating agencies, which could adversely affect the Company's business. As with other companies in the financial services industry, the Company's ratings could be downgraded at any time and without any notice by any NRSRO.

The Company's risk management policies and procedures may prove to be ineffective and leave the Company exposed to unidentified or unanticipated risk, which could adversely affect the Company's businesses or result in losses.

The Company has developed an enterprise-wide risk management and governance framework to mitigate risk and loss to the Company. The Company maintains policies, procedures and controls intended to identify, measure, monitor, report and analyze the risks to which the Company is exposed.
However, there are inherent limitations to risk management strategies because risk may exist, or emerge in the future, that the Company has not appropriately anticipated or identified. If the Company's risk management framework proves ineffective, the Company may suffer unexpected losses and could be materially adversely affected. As the Company's businesses change and the markets in which it operates evolve, the Company's risk management framework may not evolve at the same pace as those changes. As a result, there is a risk that new products or new business strategieschanges, and risks may present risks that are not be appropriately identified, monitored or managed. In times of market stress, unanticipated market movements or unanticipated claims experience resulting from greater than expected morbidity, mortality, longevity, or persistency, the effectiveness of the Company's risk management strategies may be limited, resulting in losses to the Company. In addition, underUnder difficult or less liquid market conditions, the Company's risk management strategies may not be effectiveineffective or more difficult or expensive to execute because other market participants may be using the same or similar strategies to manage risk under the same challenging market conditions. In such circumstances, it may be difficult or more expensive for the Company to mitigate risk due to the activity of such other market participants.risk.

Many of the Company's risk management strategies or techniques are based upon historical customer and market behavior and all such strategies and techniques are based to some degree on management’s subjective judgment. The Company cannot provide assurance that its risk management framework, including the underlying assumptions or strategies, will be accurate and effective.

Management of operational, legal and regulatory risks requires, among other things, policies, procedures and controls to record properly and verify a large number of transactions and events, and these policies, procedures and controls may not be fully effective. Models are utilized by theThe Company's businesses and corporate areas primarily use models to project future cash flows associated with pricing products, calculating reserves and valuing assets, as well as inand evaluating risk and determining capital requirements, among other uses. These models are utilized under a risk management policy approved by the Company's executive risk management committees, however, the models may not operate properly and rely on assumptions and projections that are inherently uncertain. As the Company's businesses continue to grow and evolve, the number and complexity of models the Company utilizes expands, increasing the Company's exposure to error in the design, implementation or use of models, including the associated input data and assumptions.

Past or future misconduct by the Company's employees or employees of the Company's third parties (suppliers which are cost-based relationships and alliance partners which are revenue-generating relationships) could result in violations of law by the Company, regulatory sanctions and/or serious reputational or financial harm, and the precautions the Company takes to


23

prevent and detect this activity may not be effective in all cases. Despite the Company's published Supplier Code of Conduct, due diligence of the Company's alliance partners, and rigorous contracting procedures (including financial, legal, IT security, and risk reviews), there can be no assurance that controls and procedures that the Company employs which are designed to assess third party viability and prevent the Company from taking excessive or inappropriate risks, will be effective. Additionally, the use of third parties also poses operational risks that could result in financial loss, operational disruption, brand damage, or compliance issues. Inadequate oversight of Aflac’sthe Company's third party suppliers due to the lack of policies, procedures, training and governance may lead to financial loss or damage to the Aflac brand.

The concentrationuse of third party vendors to support the Company's operations makes the Company susceptible to the operational risk of those third parties, which could lower revenues, increase costs, reduce profits, disrupt business, or damage the Company’s reputation.

The Company utilizes third-party vendors to provide certain business support services and functions, which exposes the Company to risks outside the control of the Company that may lead to business disruptions. The reliance on these third-party vendors creates a number of business risks, such as the risk that the Company may not maintain service quality, control or effective management of the outsourced business operations and that the Company cannot control the information systems, facilities or networks of such third-party vendors. Additionally, the Company is at risk of being unable to meet legal, regulatory, financial or customer obligations if the information systems, facilities or networks of a third-party vendor are disrupted, damaged or fail, whether due to physical disruptions, such as fire, natural disaster, pandemic or power outage, or due to cybersecurity incidents, ransomware or other impacts to vendors, including labor strikes, political unrest and terrorist attacks. Since certain third-party vendors conduct operations for the Company outside the U.S., the political and military events in foreign jurisdictions could have an adverse impact on the Company’s outsourced operations. The Company may be adversely affected by a third party vendor who operates in a poorly controlled manner or fails to deliver contracted services, which could lower revenues, increase costs, reduce profits, disrupt business, or damage the Company’s reputation.

Regulatory Risk Factors

Tax rates applicable to the Company may change.

The Company is subject to taxation in Japan, and in the U.S. under federal and numerous state and local tax jurisdictions. In preparing the Company's financial statements, the Company estimates the amount of tax that will become payable, but the Company's effective tax rate may be different than estimates due to numerous factors including accounting for income taxes, the mix of earnings from Japan and the U.S., the results of tax audits, adjustments to the value of uncertain tax positions, changes to estimates and other factors. Further, changes in U.S. or Japan tax laws or interpretations of such laws could increase the Company's corporate taxes and reduce earnings.

In addition, it remains difficult to predict the timing and effect that future tax law changes could have on the Company's earnings both in the U.S. and in foreign jurisdictions, including in connection with the current presidential administration's continuing interest in raising revenue from the corporate sector in the U.S. Any of these factors could cause the Company to experience an effective tax rate significantly different from previous periods or the Company's current estimates. If the Company's effective tax rate were to increase, the Company's financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.

If the Company fails to comply with restrictions on customer privacy and information security, including taking steps to ensure that its third-party service providers and business associates who access, store, process or transmit sensitive customer information maintain its security, integrity, confidentiality and availability, the Company's reputation and business operations could be materially adversely affected.

The collection, maintenance, use, protection, disclosure and disposal of individually identifiable data by the Company's businesses are regulated at the international, federal and state levels. These laws and rules are subject to change by legislation or administrative or judicial interpretation. With regard to personal information obtained from policyholders, the insured, or others, Aflac Japan is regulated in Japan by the APPI and guidelines issued by FSA and other governmental authorities.

Various state laws in the U.S. address the unauthorized access and acquisition of personal information and the use and disclosure of individually identifiable health data. HIPAA requires the Company to impose privacy and security requirements on its business associates (as such term is defined in the HIPAA regulations). Several states including California and New York, in which Aflac U.S. conducts significant portions of its business, have made changes to their privacy or cybersecurity laws or regulations in recent years. Further, the U.S. Congress and many states are considering new privacy and security requirements that would apply to the Company's business. Compliance with new privacy and


24

security laws, requirements, and new regulations may result in cost increases due to necessary systems changes, new limitations or constraints on the Company's business models, the development of new administrative processes, and the effects of potential noncompliance by the Company's business associates. They also may impose further restrictions on the Company's collection, disclosure and use of customer identifiable data that are housed in one or more of the Company's investment portfoliosadministrative databases. Noncompliance with any privacy laws or any security breach involving the misappropriation, loss, theft or other unauthorized disclosure of sensitive or confidential customer information, whether by the Company or by one of its third parties, could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, reputation, brand and results of operations, including: material fines and penalties; compensatory, special, punitive and statutory damages; consent orders regarding the Company's privacy and security practices; adverse actions against the Company's licenses to do business; and injunctive relief.

In addition, under Japanese laws and regulations, including the APPI, if a leak or loss of personal information by Aflac Japan or its business associates should occur, depending on factors such as the volume of personal data involved and the likelihood of other secondary damage, Aflac Japan may be required to file reports to the FSA; issue public releases explaining such incident to the public; or become subject to an FSA business improvement order, which could pose a risk to the Company's reputation.

Although the Company provides for appropriate protections through its contracts and performs information security risk assessments of its third-party service providers and business associates, the Company still has limited control over their actions and practices. In addition, despite the security measures the Company has in place to ensure compliance with applicable laws and rules, the Company's facilities and systems, and those of the Company's third-party providers and participants in its distribution channels may be vulnerable to security breaches, acts of vandalism or theft, computer viruses, misplaced or lost data, programming and/or human errors or other similar events. From time to time, the Company, its third party providers and participants in the Company’s distribution channels have experienced and will likely continue to experience such events. In such cases, notification to affected individuals, state and federal regulators, state attorneys general and media may be required, depending upon the number of affected individuals and whether personal information including health or financial data was subject to unauthorized access.

Extensive regulation and changes in legislation can impact profitability and growth.

Aflac's insurance subsidiaries are subject to complex laws and regulations that are administered and enforced by a number of governmental authorities, that exercise a degree of interpretive latitude, including the FSA and Ministry of Finance (MOF) in Japan, state insurance regulators, the BMA in Bermuda, the SEC, the NAIC, the FIO, the U.S. Department of Justice, state attorneys general, the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, and the U.S. Treasury, including the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), in the U.S. The Company is subject to the risk that compliance with any particular single-issuerregulator's or sectorenforcement authority's interpretation of a legal or regulatory issue may result in non-compliance with another regulator's or enforcement authority's interpretation of the economy maysame issue, particularly when compliance is judged in hindsight. Further, regulatory authorities periodically re-examine existing laws and regulations applicable to insurance companies and their products. Changes in these laws and regulations, or in interpretations thereof, could have ana material adverse effect on the Company's financial position orcondition and results of operations.
Negative events In addition, changes in the overall legal or developments affectingregulatory environment may, even absent any particular single issuer, industry, groupregulator's or enforcement authority's interpretation of related industries, asset class or geographic sector may have an adverse impact on a particular holding or set of holdings, which may increase risk of loss from defaults due to non-payment of interest or principal. The Company seeks to minimize this risk by maintaining an appropriate level of diversification. To the extentissue changing, cause the Company has concentrated positions,to change its views regarding the actions it needs to take from a legal or regulatory risk management perspective. This may necessitate changes to the Company's practices that may, in some cases, limit its ability to grow or otherwise negatively impact the profitability of the Company's business.

If the Company's subsidiaries fail to meet the minimum capital or operational requirements established by its respective regulators, they could have anbe subject to examination or corrective action, or the Company's financial strength ratings could be downgraded, or both. Compliance with applicable laws and regulations is time consuming and personnel-intensive, and changes in these laws and regulations may materially increase the Company's direct and indirect compliance and other expenses of doing business, thus having a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition and results of operations. See the “Government Regulation” subsections of Item 1, Business, for more information.

General Risk Factors

Competition could adversely affect the Company's ability to increase or maintain its market share or profitability.

The Company operates in a competitive environment and in an industry that is subject to ongoing changes from market pressures brought about by customer demands, legislative reform, marketing practices and changes to health care and health insurance delivery. These factors require the Company to anticipate market trends and make changes to differentiate the Company's products and services from those of its competitors. The Company also faces potential


25

competition from existing or new companies in the U.S. and Japan that have not historically been active in the supplemental health insurance industry, but some of which have greater financial, marketing and management resources than the Company. Further, some of these potential competitors could introduce new means of product development and delivery that disrupt the Company’s business model. Failure to anticipate market trends and/or to differentiate the Company's products and services can affect the Company's ability to retain or grow profitable lines of business. Further, as employers and brokers are increasingly requesting a full suite of products from one insurance provider, a failure to react and adapt to these demands could result in decreased sales or market share.

The Company's future success will depend, in part, on its ability to keep pace with rapid technological changes and to use technology to satisfy and grow customer demand for the Company's products and services and to create additional efficiencies in its operations. The Company may not be able to effectively implement new technology-driven products and services or be successful in marketing these products and services to its customers. A failure to meet evolving customer demands through innovative product development, effective distribution channels, and continuous investment in the Company's technology could adversely affect the Company's operating results. Further, the evolving fragmentation of media and marketing channels that has developed over recent years could weaken the impact of the Company’s advertising efforts over time. As a result, the Company's ability to effectively compete to retain or acquire new business may be impaired, and its business, financial condition or results of operations may be adversely affected.

Catastrophic events, including as a result of climate change, could adversely affect the Company's financial condition and results of operations as well as the availability of the Company’s infrastructure and systems.

The Company's insurance operations are exposed to the risk of catastrophic events including, but not necessarily limited to, epidemics, pandemics, tornadoes, hurricanes, earthquakes, tsunamis, war or other military action, and terrorism or other acts of violence. Claims resulting from natural or man-made catastrophic events could cause substantial volatility in the Company's financial results for any fiscal quarter or year and could materially reduce its profitability or harm the Company's financial condition, as well as affect its ability to write new business. In addition, such events may lead to periods of voluntary or required premium grace periods, which may lead to volatility in lapse rates and related premiums. Additionally, the Company's business operations may be adversely affected by such catastrophic events to the extent they disrupt the Company's physical infrastructure, human resources or systems that support its businesses and customers. Although the Company has a global crisis management framework to minimize the business disruption from a catastrophic event, such framework may not be effective to avoid an adverse impact to the Company from such an event. Climate change may increase the frequency and severity of natural disasters such as hurricanes, tornadoes, floods and forest fires. Further, the Company cannot predict the effects that any legal or regulatory changes made in response to climate change concerns would have on the Company’s business. In addition, while assessment of risks related to climate change are part of the Company's credit review process, climate change-related risks may adversely impact the value of the securities that the Company holds.

Events, including those external to the Company's operations, could damage the Company's reputation.

The Company has made significant investments in the Aflac brand over a long period of time. Because insurance products are intangible, the Company's ability to compete for and maintain policyholders relies to a large extent on consumer trust in the Company's business, including its alliance partners, sales associates and other distribution partners. The perception of unfavorable business practices or financial weakness with respect to the Company, its alliance partners, sales associates or other distribution partners could create doubt regarding the Company's ability to honor the commitments it has made to its policyholders. Such perceptions could also negatively impact the Company’s ability to attract and retain qualified sales associates, brokers and other distribution partners, including its alliance partners in Japan, and could have a material adverse effect on the Company's sales, results of operations and financial position. The Company's global investment guidelines establish

25



concentration limits for its investment portfolios.

For detailscondition. These effects could also result from a perception of a lack of commitment to sustainability efforts and attention to societal impacts, unfavorable positions on the concentrations withinitems of public policy, or from failure to make progress toward the Company's investment portfolios, seesustainability goals. Maintaining the Investments section of Item 7, MD&A,Company's stature as a trustworthy insurer and responsible corporate citizen, which helps support the Credit Risk section of Item 7A, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk, of this Form 10-K.

The valuationstrength of the Company's investmentsbrand, is critical to the Company's reputation and derivatives includes methodologies, estimations and assumptions which are subjectthe failure or perceived failure to differing interpretations anddo so could result in changes to investment valuations that may adversely affect the Company's brand value, financial condition and results of operations or financial condition.
The Company reports a significant amount of its fixed maturity securities and other financial instruments at fair value. As such, valuations may include inputs and assumptions that are less observable or require greater estimation as well as valuation methods which are more sophisticated, thereby resulting in values which may be greater or less than the value at which the investments may be ultimately sold. Rapidly changing and unprecedented credit and equity market conditions could materially impact the valuation of securities as reported within the Company's consolidated financial statements and the period-to-period changes in value could vary significantly.

Valuations of the Company's derivatives fluctuate with changes in underlying market variables, such as interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. During periods of market turbulence created by political instability, economic uncertainty, government interventions or other factors, the Company may experience significant changes in the volatility of its derivative valuations. Extreme market conditions can also affect the liquidity of such instruments creating marked differences in transaction levels and counterparty valuations. Depending on the severity and direction of the movements in its derivative valuations, the Company will face increases in the amount of collateral required to be posted with its counterparties. Liquidity stresses to the Company may also occur if the required collateral amounts increase significantly over a very short period of time. Conversely, the Company may be exposed to an increase in counterparty credit risk for short periods of time while calling collateral from its counterparties.

Elimination of LIBOR as an interest rate benchmark may create uncertainty in valuation of loans, derivatives and other assets where valuation and interest rates are based on LIBOR, and may create uncertainty in the pricing of such assets in markets for their sale and disposition.

operations.
For further discussion on investment and derivative valuations, see the Critical Accounting Estimates section in Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis, and Notes 1, 3, 4, and 5 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-K.

The Company depends heavily on key management personnel, and the loss of services of one or more of its key executives could harm the Company's business.

The Company’s success depends to a significant extent uponon the efforts and abilities of its key management personnel. The loss of the services of one or more of the Company's senior executives could significantly undermine its management expertise, and the Company's business could be adversely affected.



26

Changes in accounting standards issued by the Financial Accounting Standard Boards (FASB) or other standard-setting bodies may adversely affect the Company's financial statements.

The Company's financial statements are subject to the application of U.S. GAAP, which is periodically revised and/or expanded. Accordingly, from time to time the Company is required to adopt new or revised accounting standards issued by recognized authoritative bodies, including the FASB. The impact of accounting pronouncements that have been issued but not yet implemented and are applicable to the Company is disclosed in Note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The pronouncements expected to have the most significant impact on the Company's financial position or results of operations are outlined below.
In June 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update (ASU) 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses: Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. The amendments in this update require a financial asset (or a group of financial assets) measured on an amortized cost basis to be presented net of an allowance for current expected credit losses in order to reflect the amount expected to be collected on the financial asset(s). The Company currently estimates the after-tax net impact from the adoption of ASU 2016-13 at a $56 million decrease to retained earnings, which primarily relates to loans and loan receivables. The amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019.

26



Additionally, in August 2018 the FASB issued ASU 2018-12, Financial Services - Insurance, Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Long-Duration Contracts. The amendments in this update will significantly change how insurers account for long-duration contracts. Among the issues addressed in the amendments is the requirement to review and, if there is a change, update cash flow assumptions for the liability for future policy benefits at least annually, and to update the discount rate assumption quarterly. The Company anticipates that the requirement to review and update assumptions for liability for future policy benefits will have a significant impact on its results of operations, systems, processes, and controls, while the requirement to update the discount rate will have a significant impact on the other comprehensive income component of its equity. The amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2021. See Critical Accounting Estimates section of Item 7. MD&A in this report.

Changes to accounting standards could have a material adverse effect on the Company's results of operations and financial condition. For information on new accounting pronouncements and the impact, if any, on the Company's financial position or results of operations, seeSee Note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this report.for more information.

The Company faces risks related to litigation, regulatory investigations and inquiry and other matters.

The Company is a defendant in various lawsuits considered to be in the normal course of business. The final results of any litigation cannot be predicted with certainty, and plaintiffs may seek very large amounts in class actions or other litigation. Although some of this litigation is pending in states where large punitive damages, bearing little relation to the actual damages sustained by plaintiffs, have been awarded in recent years, the Company believes the outcome of pending litigation will not have a material adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. However, a substantial legal liability or a significant federal, state or other regulatory action against the Company, as well as regulatory inquiries or investigations, could harm the Company's reputation, result in changes in operations, result in material fines or penalties, result in significant costs due to legal fees, settlements or judgments against the Company, or otherwise have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. Without limiting the foregoing, the litigation and regulatory matters the Company is, has been, or may become, subject to include matters related to sales agent recruiting, policy sales practices, claim payments and procedures including denial or delay of benefits, the low level of Aflac U.S. benefit ratios in recent financial periods, material misstatements or omissions in the Company's financial reports or other public statements, and/or corporate governance, corporate culture or business ethics matters. Further, the Company may be subject to claims of or litigation regarding sexual or other forms of misconduct or harassment, or discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, gender, or other bases, notwithstanding that the Company's Code of Business Conduct and Ethics prohibits such harassment and discrimination by its employees, the Company has ongoing training programs and provideprovides opportunities to report claims of noncompliant conduct, and it investigates and may take disciplinary action regarding alleged harassment or discrimination. Any violations of or deviation from laws, regulations, internal or external codes or standards of normative behavior, or perceptions of such violations or deviations, by the Company's employees or by independent sales agents could adversely impact the Company's reputation and brand value, financial condition and results of operations.

Allegations or determinations of agent misclassification could adversely affect the Company’s results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.

A majority of the Company's U.S. sales force is, and has historically been, comprised of independent agents. While the Company believes that it has properly classified such agents as independent contractors, the Company may be subject to claims, regulatory action by state or federal departments of labor or tax authorities, changes in state or federal law, or litigation asserting that such agents are employees. The laws and regulations governing the classification of workers in the U.S. may be changed or interpreted differently compared to past interpretations, including in states where the Company generates significant sales through independent agents. An allegation or determination that independent agents in the Company’s U.S. sales force have been misclassified as independent contractors could result in changes in the Company’s operations and U.S. business model, result in material fines or penalties, result in significant costs due to legal fees, settlements or judgments against the Company, or otherwise have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, results of operation, financial condition and liquidity.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

Not applicable.


27



ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

In Tokyo, Japan, the Company has two primary campuses. The first campus includes a building, owned by the Company, for the customer call center, the claims department, the information technology departments, and training facility. This campus also includes a leased property, which houses Aflac Japan's policy administration and customer service departments. The second campus comprises leased office space, which serves as Aflac Japan's headquarters and houses administrative and investment support functions. The Company also leases additional office space in Tokyo, along with regional offices located throughout the country.


27

In the U.S., Aflacthe Company owns land and buildings that comprise two primary campuses located in Columbus, Georgia. These campuses include buildings that serve as the Company's worldwide headquarters and house administrative support and information technology functions for U.S. operations. AflacThe Company leases office space in Columbia, South Carolina, which houses the Company's CAIC subsidiary (branded as Aflac Group Insurance). Aflac also leases office space; in New York, thatNew York, which houses the Company's Global Investment division. Aflac alsodivision; in Tampa, Florida, which houses the Company's ABS subsidiary; and in Farmington, Connecticut, Windsor, Connecticut and Plantation, Florida, which houses the operations of the Company's group life, disability and absence management business. The Company leases other administrative office space throughout the U.S., Puerto Rico and the United Kingdom.
In Tokyo, Japan, Aflac has three primary campuses. The first campus includes a building, owned by Aflac,Company believes its properties are adequate and suitable for the customer call center, the claims department, information technology departments,its business as currently conducted and training facility. It also includes a leased property, which houses Aflac Japan's policy administration and customer service departments. The second campus comprises leased space, which serves as Aflac Japan's headquarters and houses administrative and investment support functions. The third campus comprises leased space for the information technology departments. Aflac also leases additional office space in Tokyo, along with regional offices located throughout the country.are adequately maintained.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

The Company is a defendant in various lawsuits considered to be in the normal course of business. Members of the Company's senior legal and financial management teams review litigation on a quarterly and annual basis. The final results of any litigation cannot be predicted with certainty. Although some of this litigation is pending in states where large punitive damages, bearing little relation to the actual damages sustained by plaintiffs, have been awarded in recent years, the Company believes the outcome of pending litigation will not have a material adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.




28



PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER
PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Market Information

Aflac Incorporated's common stock is principally traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol AFL. Until the beginning of October 2019, Aflac Incorporated's stock was also listed on the Tokyo Stock Exchange under designator 8686.

Holders

As of February 12, 2020,16, 2023, there were 86,22384,297 holders of record of the Company's common stock.

Dividends

For a summary of dividends paid to shareholders in 2022 and 2021 and potential restrictions on the Company's ability to pay future dividends, see the Liquidity and Capital Resources section of Item 7. MD&A.


29



Stock Performance Graph
The following graph compares the five-year performance of the Company's common stock to the Standard & Poor's 500 Index (S&P 500) and the Standard & Poor's Life and Health Insurance Index (S&P Life and Health). The Standard & Poor's Life and Health Insurance Index includes: Aflac Incorporated, Globe Life Inc., Lincoln National Corporation, MetLife Inc., Principal Financial Group Inc., and Prudential Financial Inc. and Unum Group.

jpeglinegraph.jpgafl-20221231_g3.jpg

Performance Graphic Index
December 31,
2014
 2015
 2016
 2017
 2018
 2019
201720182019202020212022
Aflac Incorporated100.00
 100.52
 119.73
 154.45
 164.04
 194.48
Aflac Incorporated100.00 106.21 125.92 108.82 146.43 185.03 
S&P 500100.00
 101.38
 113.51
 138.29
 132.23
 173.86
S&P 500100.00 95.62 125.72 148.85 191.58 156.89 
S&P Life & Health Insurance100.00
 93.69
 116.98
 136.20
 107.91
 132.92
S&P Life & Health Insurance100.00 79.23 97.60 88.35 120.76 133.25 
Copyright© 20202023 Standard & Poor’s, a division of S&P Global. All rights reserved.


30



Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
During the year ended December 31, 2019,2022, the Parent Company repurchased shares of Aflacits common stock as follows:
PeriodTotal
Number of
Shares
Purchased
 Average
Price Paid
Per Share
 Total
Number
of Shares
Purchased
as Part of
Publicly
Announced
Plans or
Programs
 Maximum    
Number of    
Shares that    
May Yet Be    
Purchased    
Under the    
Plans or    
Programs    
 PeriodTotal
Number of
Shares
Purchased
Average
Price Paid
Per Share
Total
Number
of Shares
Purchased
as Part of
Publicly
Announced
Plans or
Programs
Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs 
January 1 - January 31 4,465,400
 $46.44
 4,465,400
 64,582,487
 January 1 - January 311,933,400 $61.87 1,933,400 53,895,617 
February 1 - February 28 4,170,417
 48.65
 3,624,583
 60,957,904
 February 1 - February 283,183,212 63.58 2,845,206 51,050,411 
March 1 - March 31 2,162,830
 49.50
 2,147,500
 58,810,404
 March 1 - March 313,233,866 61.93 3,228,600 47,821,811 
April 1 - April 30 2,177,000
 49.21
 2,177,000
 56,633,404
 April 1 - April 302,592,239 62.98 2,589,500 45,232,311 
May 1 - May 31 2,813,277
 50.99
 2,812,850
 53,820,554
 May 1 - May 314,284,400 57.22 4,284,400 40,947,911 
June 1 - June 30 1,964,259
 54.44
 1,952,000
 51,868,554
 June 1 - June 304,315,931 56.12 4,310,888 36,637,023 
July 1 - July 31 1,360,017
 54.33
 1,360,017
 50,508,537
 July 1 - July 313,670,800 55.40 3,670,800 32,966,223 
August 1 - August 31 2,491,225
 51.22
 2,483,400
 48,025,137
 August 1 - August 313,983,200 61.37 3,983,200 28,983,023 
September 1 - September 30 2,111,075
 51.81
 2,103,600
 45,921,537
 September 1 - September 303,406,571 59.47 3,403,200 25,579,823 
October 1 - October 31 2,476,152
 52.43
 2,476,100
 43,445,437
 October 1 - October 312,817,100 60.01 2,817,100 22,762,723 
November 1 - November 30 1,938,000
 54.03
 1,938,000
 41,507,437
 November 1 - November 302,867,949 69.91 2,856,100 119,906,623 
December 1 - December 31 4,456,463
 52.92
 4,453,824
 37,053,613
  December 1 - December 313,268,609 70.89 3,264,800 116,641,823 
Total 32,586,115
 
(1) 
 $50.82
 31,994,274
 37,053,613
 Total39,557,277 (1)$61.29 39,187,194 116,641,823 (2)
(1)During the year ended December 31, 2019, 591,8412022, 370,083 shares were purchased in connection with income tax withholding obligations related to the vesting of restricted-share-based awards during the period.

As of December 31, 2019, a(2) The total remaining balance of 37.1 million shares of the Company's common stock was available for purchase underat December 31, 2022, consisted of 16,641,823 shares related to a 100,000,000 share repurchase authorizationsauthorization by its Boardthe board of Directors.directors announced in August 2020 and 100,000,000 shares related to a 100,000,000 share repurchase authorization by the board of directors announced in November 2022.

31



ITEM 6.     SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA[RESERVED]

Aflac Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Years Ended December 31,


31
(In millions, except for share and per-share amounts)2019 2018 2017 2016 2015
Revenues:         
Net premiums, principally supplemental
health insurance
$18,780
 $18,677
 $18,531
 $19,225
 $17,570
Net investment income3,578
 3,442
 3,220
 3,278
 3,135
Realized investment gains (losses)(135) (430) (151) (14) 106
Other income84
 69
 67
 70
 61
Total revenues22,307
 21,758
 21,667
 22,559
 20,872
Benefits and expenses:         
Benefits and claims, net11,942
 12,000
 12,181
 12,919
 11,746
Expenses5,920
 5,775
 5,468
 5,573
 5,264
Total benefits and expenses17,862
 17,775
 17,649
 18,492
 17,010
Pretax earnings4,445
 3,983
 4,018
 4,067
 3,862
Income taxes1,141
 1,063
 (586) 1,408
 1,329
Net earnings$3,304
 $2,920
 $4,604
 $2,659
 $2,533
Share and Per-Share Amounts         
Net earnings (basic)$4.45
 $3.79
 $5.81
 $3.23
 $2.94
Net earnings (diluted)4.43
 3.77
 5.77
 3.21
 2.92
Cash dividends paid1.08
 1.04
 .87
 .83
 .79
Cash dividends declared1.08
 1.04
 .87
 .83
 .79
Weighted-average common shares used for basic
EPS (In thousands)
742,414
 769,588
 792,042
 822,942
 861,307
Weighted-average common shares used for diluted
EPS (In thousands)
746,430
 774,650
 797,861
 827,841
 866,344
Supplemental Data         
Yen/dollar exchange rate at year-end (yen)109.56
 111.00
 113.00
 116.49
 120.61
Weighted-average yen/dollar exchange rate (yen)109.07
 110.39
 112.16
 108.70
 120.99



32



Aflac Incorporated and Subsidiaries
December 31,
(In millions)2019 2018 2017 2016 2015
Assets:         
Investments and cash$138,091
 $126,243
 $123,659
 $116,361
 $105,897
Other14,677
 14,163
 13,558
 13,458
 12,359
Total assets$152,768
 $140,406
 $137,217
 $129,819
 $118,256
Liabilities and shareholders’ equity:         
Policy liabilities$106,554
 $103,188
 $99,147
 $93,726
 $87,631
Income taxes5,370
 4,020
 4,745
 5,387
 4,340
Notes payable and lease obligations (1)
6,569
 5,778
 5,289
 5,360
 4,971
Other liabilities5,316
 3,958
 3,438
 4,864
 3,606
Shareholders’ equity28,959
 23,462
 24,598
 20,482
 17,708
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity$152,768
 $140,406
 $137,217
 $129,819
 $118,256
(1) See Note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the adoption of accounting guidance on January 1, 2019 related to leases.
Prior-year amounts have been adjusted for the adoption of accounting guidance on January 1, 2016 related to debt issuance costs.



33



ITEM 7.    MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS

Certain statements included in this section constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are made based on management’s current expectations and beliefs concerning future developments and their potential effects upon the Company. The Company’s actual results may differ, possibly materially, from expectations or estimates reflected in such forward-looking statements. Certain important factors that could cause actual results to differ, possibly materially, from expectations or estimates reflected in such forward-looking statements can be found in the “Risk Factors” and “Forward-Looking Statements” sections herein.

MD&A OVERVIEW

The following financial review provides a discussion of the Company’s results of operations and financial condition, as well as a summary of the Company’s critical accounting estimates. This section should be read in conjunction with Part I - Item 1. Business and the audited consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included in Part II - Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this report. This MD&A is divided into the following sections:

The Company elected to omit discussion on the earliest of the three years covered by the consolidated financial statements presented in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data. Readers should refer to Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations located in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20182021, filed on February 25, 2019,23, 2022, for reference to discussion of the year ended December 31, 2017,2020, the earliest of the three years presented. Amounts reported in this MD&A may not addfoot due to rounding.


34


32


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Market Conditions

The impact of the COVID-19 global pandemic on the Company continues to evolve and the continued path of the global economic recovery remains uncertain given the potential longer-term impacts that have resulted from or are coincidental with the pandemic. For example, economic conditions have acted as headwinds to sales and earned premiums in 2022. Further, continued widening of the differential between U.S. and Japan interest rates has contributed to a weakening of the yen, which has the effect of suppressing the Company's current period results in relation to the comparable prior period. For additional information see the Result of Operations by Segment section of this MD&A.

Performance Highlights

For the full year of 2019,2022, total revenues were up 2.5%down 11.8% to $22.3$19.5 billion, compared with $21.8$22.1 billion for the full year of 2018.2021. Net earnings were $3.3$4.2 billion, or $4.43 per diluted share, compared with $2.9 billion, or $3.77$6.59 per diluted share, for the full year of 2018.2022, compared with $4.3 billion, or $6.39 per diluted share, for the full year of 2021, reflecting an income tax benefit of $452 million from the release of a deferred tax liability.

Results for 20192022 included pretax net realized investment lossesgains of $135$363 million, compared with net realized investment lossesgains of $430$468 million in 2018.2021. Net investment lossesgains in 20192022 included $31an increase in credit loss allowances of $36 million; $273 million of other-than-temporary impairment losses and changes in loan loss reserves; $236 million in net lossesgains from certain derivativesderivative and foreign currency gains or losses; $101$341 million of net gainslosses on equity securities; and $31$467 million of net gains from sales and redemptions.

The average yen/dollar exchange rate(1) in 20192022 was 109.07,130.17, or 1.2% stronger15.7% weaker than the rate of 110.39109.79 in 2018.2021.

Adjusted earnings(2) for the full year of 20192022 were $3.3$3.4 billion, or $4.44$5.33 per diluted share, compared with $3.2$4.0 billion, or $4.16$5.94 per diluted share, in 2018.2021. The strongerweaker yen/dollar exchange rate negatively impacted adjusted earnings per diluted share by $.02.$.34.

Total investments and cash at the end of December 201931, 2022 were $138.1$117.4 billion, compared with $126.2$143.0 billion at December 31, 2018. 2021. The decline in the portfolio was principally driven by the weaker yen and higher interest rates. In 2019,2022, Aflac Incorporated repurchased $1.6$2.4 billion, or 32.039.2 million of its common shares. At the end of December 31, 2022, the Company had 37.1116.6 million remaining shares authorized for repurchase.


Shareholders’ equity was $29.0$22.4 billion, or $39.84$36.35 per share, at December 31, 2019,2022, compared with $23.5$33.3 billion, or $31.06$50.99 per share, at December 31, 2018.2021. Shareholders’ equity at December 31, 20192022 included a net unrealized gainloss on investment securities and derivatives of $8.5 billion,$729 million, compared with a net unrealized gain of $4.2$9.6 billion at December 31, 2018.2021. Shareholders’ equity at December 31, 20192022 also included an unrealized foreign currency translation lossof $1.6$3.6 billion, compared with an unrealized foreign currency translation loss of $1.8$2.0 billion at December 31, 2018.2021. The annualized return on average shareholders’ equity in 20192022 was 12.6%15.1%.

Shareholders’ equity excluding accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI)(2) (adjusted book value)(2) was $22.3$26.8 billion, or $30.74$43.51 per share at December 31, 2019,2022, compared with $21.3$25.9 billion, or $28.22$39.65 per share, at December 31, 2018.2021. The annualized adjusted return on equity excluding foreign currencyimpact(2) in 20192022 was 15.1%13.7%.

(1) Yen/U.S. dollar exchange rates are based on the published MUFG Bank, Ltd. telegraphic transfer middle rate (TTM).
(2) See the Results of Operations section of this MD&A for a definition of this non-U.S. GAAP financial measure.

INDUSTRY TRENDS

The Company is impacted by financial markets, economic conditions, regulatory oversight and a variety of trends that affect the industries where it competes.

Financial and Economic Environment

The Company’s business and results of operations are materially affected by conditions in the global capital markets and the economy generally. Stressed conditions, volatility and disruptions in global capital markets, particular markets, or financial asset classes can have an adverse effect on the Company, in part because the Company has a large investment portfolio and its insurance liabilities and derivatives are sensitive to changing market factors. See Item 1A. Risk Factors for the risk factor entitled, "Difficult conditions in global capital markets and the economy, including those caused by


33

COVID-19, could have a material adverse effect on the Company's investments, capital position, revenue, profitability, and liquidity and harm the Company's business."

Demographics

Aflac Japan Business - Segment

With Japan’s aging population and the rise in healthcare costs, supplemental health care insurance products remain attractive. However, due to the aging population and decline in birthrate, new opportunities for customer demographics are not as readily available. Japan’s existing customers and potential customers seek products that are easily understood, cost-effective and can be accessed through technology-enabled devices.






Aflac U.S. Segment
(1) Yen/U.S. dollar exchange rates are based on the published MUFG Bank, Ltd. telegraphic transfer middle rate (TTM).
(2) See the Results of Operations section of this MD&A for a definition of this non-U.S. GAAP financial measure.

35



U.S. Business - Customer demographics continue to evolve and new opportunities present themselves in different customer segments such as the millennial and multicultural markets. Customer expectations and preferences are changing. Trends indicate existing customers and potential customers seek cost-effective solutions that are easily understood and can be accessed through technology-enabled devices. Additionally, income protection and the health needs of retiring baby boomers are continuing to shape the insurance industry.

Regulatory Environment

See Item 1. Business - Aflac U.S.Japan Government Regulation and Aflac JapanU.S. Government Regulation for a discussion of regulatory developments that may impact the Company and the associated risks.

Competitive Environment

See Item 1. Business - Aflac U.S. CompetitionJapan Competitive Markets and Aflac Japan CompetitionU.S. Competitive Markets for a discussion of the competitive environment and the basis on which the Company competes in each of its segments.

20202023 OUTLOOK

The Company’s strategy to drive long-term shareholder value is to pursue growth through product development and distribution expansion and digital advancements to improve the customer experience.achieve efficiencies by modernizing its technology and streamlining its operations.

The Company's objectives in 20202023 are to maintain strong pre-tax margins with increased sales production through product refreshment in its Aflac Japan segment and to begin realizing benefits from its buy to build initiatives and other platform investments, manage expenses and strengthen the number of career agents for Aflac U.S. segments through disciplined product pricing, stable investment returns and leveraging a periodThe Company believes that its strategy of favorable benefit ratios to invest in its platformpositioning itself for future growth and efficiency. The Company believes thatefficiency while defending and leveraging its market-leading position, powerful brand recognition and diverse distribution in Japan and the U.S. will provide support toward these objectives.

The Company believes thatannounced a 5.0% increase in the first quarter 2023 dividend compared to the prior quarter, and it intends to maintain strong capital ratios in Aflac Japan and Aflac U.S. in support of its efforts will supportcommitment to shareholder dividends while remaining tactical in its prudent strategies fordeployment of capital deployment in the form of dividends, share repurchases and opportunistic investments that enhance the Company’s business with a focus on digital distribution and leveraging the Company’s brand, distribution and scale.investments. The Company has stated that the dividend payout ratio from its Aflac Japan segment is likelyintends to be to 100%maintain a minimum SMR of FSA earnings from500% for Aflac Japan and 100%a target combined RBC over time of U.S. statutory earnings fromapproximately 400% for Aflac U.S. In its Aflac U.S. segment,, consistent with the Company plans to maintain a risk-based capital (RBC) ratio in the 500% range for 2020.Company's risk management practices.

Aflac Japan Segment
InFor Aflac Japan, the Company anticipates that the shift in earned premiumpremiums over the last several years from first sector savings products to third sector cancer and medical products and first sector protection products, will continue to result in moderately lower benefit ratios in the Aflac Japan segment. The Company also expects this shift in business mix, plus continued investment in ITthat benefit and digital advancements, to result in moderately higher expense ratios for Aflac Japan. The Company anticipates the Japan segment will facecontinue to experience some level of revenue challenges in 2020pressure due to the run-offimpact of paid up policies and paid-up status of first sector savings and third sector products. Thereduced sales compared to years prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. For the 2023 through 2024 period, the Company expects a decline in the range of .7%Aflac Japan net earned premiums in third sector and first sector protection earned premium for 2020. In addition, net investment income is expected to decline modestly as compared to 2019, due in part to the low interest rate environment in Japan and de-risking of the portfolio, partially offset by lower hedge cost as a result of a reduction in the hedge ratio in the fourth quarter of 2019.

Aflac U.S. Segment
The Company expects the profit marginssingle digit range after adjusting for the Aflac U.S. segment to remain strong, providingimpact of deferred profit liability reclassification and an expected new internal reinsurance program, with a prudent opportunity to reinvest profits back into the U.S. business. The Company anticipates that in 2020, benefit ratios in the U.S. will remain stable and that expense ratios will continue to be elevated in light of investments into U.S. platforms in both the individual and group channels. The Company expects Aflac U.S. to generate earned premium growthratio in the range of 1%66% to 68% and an expense ratio in 2020. Net investment income is expectedthe range of 20% to decline modestly, primarily as the result of the Company’s implemented U.S. capital and RBC draw-down plan.22%.

Corporate and Other Segment
The Company expects corporate segment results to benefit from net investment income driven by increased capital and liquidity held at the Parent Company, as well as the increase in size of the Company’s enterprise currency hedging strategy. The anticipated increase in investment income is expected to be partially offset by increased costs associated with continued investment in Aflac Corporate Ventures initiatives.

36


34


Aflac U.S. Segment
For Aflac U.S., the Company expects benefit ratios to normalize in 2023 and for expense ratios to decline over the next five years as the Company begins to realize the benefits from investments into U.S. platforms, continues to scale its acquisitions, and focuses on earned premium growth. For the 2023 through 2024 period, the Company expects Aflac U.S. net earned premium growth of 3% to 5% on a compound annual growth rate basis, with a benefit ratio in the range of 47% to 50% and an expense ratio in the range of 37% to 40%.

Corporate and other
The Company expects Corporate and other results to reflect stable net investment income in 2023 compared to 2022, assuming that U.S. interest rates remain stable.

For important disclosures applicable to statements made in this 20202023 Outlook, please see the Risk Factors section and the statement on Forward-Looking Information at the beginning of Item 1. Business, the Risk Factors identified in Item 1A. and this Item 7. Management Discussion and Analysis.MD&A.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The Company earns its revenues principally from insurance premiums and investments. The Company’s operating expenses primarily consist of insurance benefits provided and reserves established for anticipated future insurance benefits, general business expenses, commissions and other costs of selling and servicing its products. Profitability for the Company depends principally on its ability to price its insurance products at a level that enables the Company to earn a margin over the costs associated with providing benefits and administering those products. Profitability also depends on, among other items, actuarial and policyholder behavior experience on insurance products, and the Company's ability to attract and retain customer assets, generate and maintain favorable investment results, effectively deploy capital and utilize tax capacity, and manage expenses.


Yen–denominated income statement accounts are translated to U.S. dollars using a weighted average Japanese yen/U.S. dollar foreign exchange rate, except realized gains and losses on security transactions which are translated at the exchange rate on the trade date of each transaction. Yen–denominated balance sheet accounts are translated to U.S. dollars using a spot Japanese yen/U.S. dollar foreign exchange rate.

The following discussionThis document includes references to the Company'sCompany’s financial performance measures adjusted earnings, adjusted earnings per diluted share, and amortized hedge costs/income, which are not calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAPUnited States generally accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP) (non-U.S. GAAP). TheseThe financial measures exclude items that the Company believes may obscure the underlying fundamentals and trends in the Company's insurance operations because they tend to be driven by general economic conditions and events or related to infrequent activities not directly associated with its insurance operations. The

Due to the size of Aflac Japan, where the functional currency is the Japanese yen, fluctuations in the yen/dollar exchange rate can have a significant effect on reported results. In periods when the yen weakens, translating yen into dollars results in fewer dollars being reported. When the yen strengthens, translating yen into dollars results in more dollars being reported. Consequently, yen weakening has the effect of suppressing current period results in relation to the comparable prior period, while yen strengthening has the effect of magnifying current period results in relation to the comparable prior period. A significant portion of the Company’s business is conducted in yen and never converted into dollars but translated into dollars for U.S. GAAP reporting purposes, which results in foreign currency impact to earnings, cash flows and book value on a U.S. GAAP basis. Management evaluates the Company's management uses adjusted earnings and adjusted earnings per diluted share to evaluate the financial performance both including and excluding the impact of its insurance operations on a consolidated basis,foreign currency translation to monitor, respectively, cumulative currency impacts and the Company believes that a presentation of these measurescurrency-neutral operating performance over time. The average yen/dollar exchange rate is vitally important to an understanding of its underlying profitability drivers and trends of its insurance business. The Company believes that amortized hedge costs/income, which are a component of adjusted earnings, measurebased on the periodic currency risk management costs/income related to hedging certain foreign currency exchange risks and are an important component of net investment income.published MUFG Bank, Ltd. telegraphic transfer middle rate (TTM).

The Company defines the non-U.S. GAAP financial measures included in this filingdocument as follows:

Adjusted earnings are the profits derived from operations.The most comparable U.S. GAAP measure is net earnings. Adjusted earnings are adjusted revenues less benefits and adjusted expenses. Adjusted earnings per share (basic or diluted) are the adjusted earnings for the period divided by the weighted average outstanding shares (basic or diluted) for the period presented. The adjustments to both revenues and expenses account for certain items that cannot be predicted or that are outside management’s control. Adjusted revenues are U.S. GAAP total revenues excluding realizedadjusted net investment gains and losses, except for amortized hedge costs/income related to foreign currency exposure management strategies and net interest cash flows from derivatives associated with certain investment strategies.losses. Adjusted expenses are U.S. GAAP total acquisition and operating expenses including the impact of interest cash flows from derivatives associated with notes payable but excluding any nonrecurring or other items not associated with the normal course of the Company’s insurance operations and that do not reflect the Company's underlying business performance.

Adjusted Management uses adjusted earnings and adjusted earnings per diluted share to evaluate the financial performance of the Company’s insurance operations on a consolidated basis and believes that a presentation of these financial measures is vitally important to an understanding of the underlying profitability drivers and trends of the Company’s insurance business. The most comparable U.S. GAAP financial measures for adjusted earnings and adjusted earnings per share (basic or diluted) are net earnings and net earnings per share, respectively.


35


Adjusted net investment gains and losses are net investment gains and losses adjusted earnings for i) amortized hedge cost/income related to foreign currency exposure management strategies and certain derivative activity, ii) net interest cash flows from foreign currency and interest rate derivatives associated with certain investment strategies, which are both reclassified to net investment income, and iii) the period divided byimpact of interest cash flows from derivatives associated with notes payable, which is reclassified to interest expense as a component of total adjusted expenses. The Company considers adjusted net investment gains and losses important as it represents the weighted average outstanding shares (basic or diluted) forremainder amount that is considered outside management’s control, while excluding the period presented.components that are within management’s control and are accordingly reclassified to net investment income and interest expense. The most comparable U.S. GAAP financial measure for adjusted net investment gains and losses is net earnings per share.investment gains and losses.

Amortized hedge costs/income represent costs/income incurred or recognized inas a result of using foreign currency forward
contractsderivatives to hedge certain foreign exchange risks in the Company's Japan segment (costs) or in the Corporate and Other segment (income).other. These amortized hedge costs/income are derived fromestimated at the difference betweeninception of the foreign currency spot rate at timederivatives based on the specific terms of trade inceptioneach contract and the contractual foreign currency forward rate,are recognized on a straight linestraight-line basis over the term of the hedge. The Company believes that amortized hedge costs/income measure the periodic currency risk management costs/income related to hedging certain foreign currency exchange risks and are an important component of net investment income. There is no comparable U.S. GAAP financial measure for amortized hedge costs/income.

Adjusted earnings excluding current period foreign currency impact are computed using the average foreign currency exchange rate for the comparable prior-year period, which eliminates fluctuations driven solely by foreign currency exchange rate changes. Adjusted earnings per diluted share excluding current period foreign currency impact is adjusted earnings excluding current period foreign currency impact divided by the weighted average outstanding diluted shares for the period presented. The Company considers adjusted earnings excluding current period foreign currency impact and adjusted earnings per diluted share excluding current period foreign currency impact important because a significant portion of the Company's business is conducted in Japan and foreign exchange rates are outside management’s control; therefore, the Company believes it is important to understand the impact of translating foreign currency (primarily Japanese yen) into U.S. dollars. The most comparable U.S. GAAP financial measures for adjusted earnings excluding current period foreign currency impact and adjusted earnings per diluted share excluding current period foreign currency impact are computed using the average yen/dollar exchange rate for the comparable prior year period, which eliminates fluctuations driven solely by yen-to-dollar currency rate changes.net earnings and net earnings per share, respectively.


37



Amounts excluding foreign currency impact on U.S. dollar-denominated investment income were determined using the average dollar/yen exchange rate for the comparable prior year period.

Adjusted book value is the U.S. GAAP book value (representing total shareholders'shareholders’ equity), less AOCI as recorded on the U.S. GAAP balance sheet. Adjusted book value per common share is adjusted book value at the period end divided by the ending outstanding common shares for the period presented. The Company considers adjusted book value and adjusted book value per common share important as it excludesthey exclude AOCI, which fluctuates due to market movements that are outside management'smanagement’s control. The most comparable U.S. GAAP financial measures for adjusted book value and adjusted book value per common share are total book value and total book value per common share, respectively.

Adjusted return on equity (ROE) excluding foreign currency impact is calculated using adjusted earnings excluding the current period foreign currency impact of the yen/dollar exchange rate, as reconciled with total U.S. GAAP net earnings, divided by average shareholders’ equity, excluding AOCI. The Company considers adjusted return on equity excluding foreign currency impact important as it excludes changes in foreign currency and components of AOCI, which fluctuate due to market movements that are outside management's control. The most comparable U.S. GAAP financial measure isfor adjusted return on average equity excluding foreign currency impact is ROE as determined using net earnings and average total shareholders’ equity.

U.S. dollar-denominated investment income excluding foreign currency impact represents amounts excluding foreign currency impact on U.S. dollar-denominated investment income using the average foreign currency exchange rate for the comparable prior year period. The Company considers U.S. dollar-denominated investment income excluding foreign currency impact important as it eliminates the impact of foreign currency changes on the Aflac Japan segment results, which are outside management’s control. The most comparable U.S. GAAP financial measure for U.S. dollar-denominated investment income excluding foreign currency impact is the corresponding net investment income amount from the U.S. dollar denominated investments translated to yen.



36

The following table is a reconciliation of items impacting adjusted earnings and adjusted earnings per diluted share to the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP financial measures of net earnings and net earnings per diluted share, respectively, for the years ended December 31.
Reconciliation of Net Earnings to Adjusted Earnings(1)
In Millions Per Diluted ShareIn MillionsPer Diluted Share
2019 2018 2019 20182022202120222021
Net earnings$3,304
 $2,920
 $4.43
 $3.77
Net earnings$4,201 $4,325 $6.59 $6.39 
Items impacting net earnings:       Items impacting net earnings:
Realized investment (gains) losses (2),(3),(4),(5)
15
 297
 .02
 .38
Adjusted net investment (gains) losses (1)
Adjusted net investment (gains) losses (1)
(447)(462)(.70)(.68)
Other and non-recurring (income) loss1
 75
 .00
 .10
Other and non-recurring (income) loss(1)73 .00 .11 
Income tax (benefit) expense on items
excluded from adjusted earnings
(3) (83) .00
 (.11)
Tax reform adjustment (6)
(4) 18
 (.01) .02
Income tax (benefit) expense on items
excluded from adjusted earnings (2)
Income tax (benefit) expense on items
excluded from adjusted earnings (2)
(357)83 (.56).12 
Adjusted earnings3,314
 3,226
 4.44
 4.16
Adjusted earnings3,397 4,019 5.33 5.94 
Current period foreign currency impact (7)(3)
(15) N/A
 (.02) N/A
215 N/A.34 N/A
Adjusted earnings excluding current period
foreign currency impact
$3,299
 $3,226
 $4.42
 $4.16
Adjusted earnings excluding current period
foreign currency impact
$3,613 $4,019 $5.67 $5.94 
(1) Amounts may not foot due to rounding.
(2) Amortized hedge costs of $257 in 2019 and $236 in 2018, related to certain foreign currency exposure management strategies have been reclassified from realized investment gains (losses) and included in adjusted earnings as a decrease to net investment income. See "Hedge Costs/Income" discussion below for further information.
(3)Amortized hedge income of $89 in 2019 and $36 in 2018, related to certain foreign currency exposure management strategies have been reclassified from realized investment gains (losses) and included in adjusted earnings as an increase to net investment income. See "Hedge Costs/Income" discussion below for further information.
(4) Net interest cash flows from derivatives associated with certain investment strategies of $(17) in 2019 and an immaterial amount for 2018 have been reclassified from realized investment gains (losses) and included in adjusted earnings as a componentreconciliation of net investment income.(gains) losses to adjusted net investment (gains) losses below.
(5)(2) A gainIncludes release of $66$452 in 2019 and $67deferred taxes in 2018, respectively, related to the interest rate component of the change in fair value of foreign currency swaps on notes payable have been reclassified from realized investment gains (losses) and included in adjusted earnings as a component of interest expense.2022.
(6) The impact of Tax Reform was adjusted in 2018 for return-to-provision adjustments, various amended returns filed by the company, and final true-ups of deferred tax liabilities. Further impacts were recorded in 2019 a result of additional guidance released by the IRS.
(7)(3) Prior period foreign currency impact reflected as “N/A” to isolate change for current period only.

Reconciling Items

RealizedNet Investment Gains and Losses

Reconciliation of Net Investment (Gains) Losses to Adjusted Net Investment (Gains) Losses
(In millions)20222021
Net investment (gains) losses$(363)$(468)
Items impacting net investment (gains) losses:
Amortized hedge costs(112)(76)
Amortized hedge income68 57 
Net interest cash flows from derivatives associated with certain investment strategies(90)(30)
Interest rate component of the change in fair value of foreign currency swaps on
   notes payable
50 55 
Adjusted net investment (gains) losses$(447)$(462)

The Company's investment strategy is to invest primarily in fixed maturity securities to provide a reliable stream of investment income, which is one of the drivers of the Company’s growth and profitability. This investment strategy incorporates asset-liability matching (ALM) to align the expected cash flows of the portfolio to the needs of the Company's liability structure. The Company does not purchase securities with the intent of generating capitalinvestment gains or losses. However, investment gains and losses may be realized as a result of changes in the financial markets and the creditworthiness of specific issuers, tax planning strategies, and/or general portfolio management and rebalancing. The realization of investment gains and losses is independent of the underwriting and administration of the Company's insurance products. Realized

Net investment gains and losses excluded from adjusted earnings include the following:

Securities Transactions
Credit Losses
Changes in the Fair Value of Equity Securities
Certain Derivative and Foreign Currency Activities.

38


37


losses include securities transactions, impairments, changes in loan loss reserves, derivative and foreign currency activities and changes in fair value of equity securities.
Securities Transactions, Impairments,Credit Losses and Gains (Losses) onChanges in the Fair Value of Equity Securities

Securities transactions include gains and losses from sales and redemptions of investments where the amount received is different from the amortized cost of the investment. ImpairmentsCredit losses include other-than-temporary-impairment losses on investmentfor held-to-maturity fixed maturity securities, as well as changes inavailable-for-sale fixed maturity securities, loan loss reserves forreceivables, loan receivables. Startingcommitments and reinsurance recoverables. Changes in the first quarter of 2018, gains and losses from changes in fair value of equity securities are recordedthe result of gains or losses driven by fluctuations in earnings.market prices.

Certain Derivative and Foreign Currency Gains (Losses)Activities

The Company's derivative activities include include:

foreign currency forwards and options used in hedging foreign exchange risk on certain fixed maturity securities; U.S. dollar-denominated investments in Aflac Japan's portfolio, with options used on a standalone basis and/or in a collar strategy;

foreign currency forwards and options thatused to economically hedge certain portions of forecasted cash flows denominated in yen and hedge the Company's long-termlong term exposure to a weakening yen;

cross-currency interest rate swaps, also referred to as foreign currency swaps, associated with certain senior notes and subordinated debentures;

foreign currency swaps and credit defaults swaps held in consolidatedthat are associated with variable interest entity (VIE) bond purchase commitments, and investments in special-purpose entities, (VIEs); including VIEs where the Company is the primary beneficiary;

interest rate swaps used to economically hedge interest rate fluctuations in certain variable-rate investments; and

interest rate swaptions used to hedge changes in the fair value associated with interest rate changesfluctuations for certain U.S. dollar-denominated available-for-sale securities. fixed-maturity securities; and

bond purchase commitments at the inception of investments in consolidated VIEs.

Gains and losses are recognized as a result of valuing these derivatives, net of the effects of hedge accounting. The Company also excludes from adjusted earnings the accounting impacts of remeasurement associated with changes in the yen/dollar exchange rate from adjusted earnings. Amortized hedge costs/ income related to certain foreign currency exposure management strategies (see Amortized Hedge Cost/Income section below), and net interest cash flows from derivatives associated with certain investment strategies and notes payable are reclassified from realized investment gains (losses) and included in adjusted earnings.exchange rate.

Amortized hedge costs/income can fluctuate based upon many factors, including the derivative notional amount, the length of time of the derivative contract, changes in both U.S. and Japan interest rates, and supply and demand for dollar funding. Amortized hedge costs and income have fluctuated in recent periods due to changes in the previously mentioned factors. For additional information regarding foreign currency hedging, refer to Hedging Activities in the Investments section of this MD&A.

For additional information regarding realizednet investment gains and losses, including details of reported amounts for the periods presented, see Notes 3 and 4 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Other and Non-recurring Items

The U.S. insurance industry has a policyholder protection system that provides funds for the policyholders of insolvent insurers. The system can result in periodic charges to the Company as a result of insolvencies/bankruptcies that occur with other companies in the life insurance industry. Some states permit member insurers to recover assessments paid through full or partial premium tax offsets. These charges neither relate to the ordinary course of the Company’s business nor reflect the Company’s underlying business performance, but result from external situations not controlled by the Company. The Company excludes any charges associated with U.S. guaranty fund assessments and the corresponding tax benefit or expense from adjusted earnings.

In Japan, the government also requires the insurance industry to contribute to a policyholder protection corporation that provides funds for the policyholders of insolvent insurers; however, these costs are calculated and administered differently than in the U.S. In Japan, these costs are not directly related to specific insolvencies or bankruptcies, but are rather a regular operational cost for an insurance company. Based on this structure, the Company does not remove the Japan policyholder protection expenses from adjusted earnings.

The Company considers the costs associated with the early redemption of its debt to be unrelated to the underlying fundamentals and trends in its insurance operations. Additionally, these costs are driven by changes in interest rates subsequent to the issuance of the debt, and the Company considers these interest rate changes to represent economic conditions not directly associated with its insurance operations. In May 2021, the Parent Company used a portion of the net proceeds from its April 2021 issuance of various series of senior notes to redeem $700 million of its 3.625% senior notes due June 2023. The pretax expense due to the early redemption of these notes was $48 million.
Nonrecurring


38

Other items also include conversionexcluded from adjusted earnings included integration costs related to legally converting the Company's Japan business to a subsidiary;acquisition of Zurich North America's U.S. Corporate Life and Pensions business; these costs primarily consist of expenditures for legal, accounting, consulting, integration of systems and processes and other similar services. These Japan branch conversionintegration costs were an immaterial amountare excluded from adjusted earnings for one year following the year-ended December 31, 2019acquisition and $75amounted to $26 million for the year-endedyear ended December 31, 2018.2021.


Income Taxes

The Company's combined U.S. and Japanese effective income tax rate on pretax earnings was 25.7%8.8% in 20192022 and 26.7%18.7% in 2018. The decrease in2021. In 2022, the U.S. federal statutory corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018 drove the reduction in thecombined effective tax rate for 2019differs from the U.S. statutory rate primarily due to the impact of the tax accounting method change discussed below, as well as historic and 2018.solar tax credits. In 2021, the combined effective tax rate differs from the U.S. statutory rate primarily due to historic and solar tax credits. Total income taxes were $1.1 billion$403 million in both 20192022 and 2018.$997 million in 2021. Japanese income taxes on Aflac Japan's results account for most of the Company's consolidated income tax expense.

39Aflac Japan holds certain U.S. dollar-denominated assets in a Delaware Statutory Trust (DST). These assets are mostly comprised of various U.S. dollar-denominated commercial mortgage loans. The functional currency of the DST for U.S. tax purposes was historically the Japanese yen. In 2022, the Company requested a change in tax accounting method through the Internal Revenue Service's automatic consent procedures to change its functional currency on the DST for U.S. tax purposes to the U.S. dollar. As a result, foreign currency translation gains or losses on assets held in the DST will no longer be recognized for U.S. tax purposes. The Company historically recorded a deferred tax liability for foreign currency translation gains on the DST assets, which was released in the third quarter of 2022 as a result of the functional currency change and subsequently adjusted for foreign currency impacts in the fourth quarter of 2022. This change in functional currency resulted in the Company recognizing an income tax benefit of $452 million ($0.71 per basic and diluted share, respectively) in 2022.


its common stock. The Company does not anticipate any impacts from the new corporate minimum tax rate since its current tax rate is above the 15% minimum rate. Further, the Company expects the charges associated with the excise tax to be recognized in equity consistent with other costs related to treasury stock.

For furtheradditional information, see "Critical Accounting Estimates - Income Taxes" in this MD&A, and Note 10 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements and the Critical Accounting Estimates - Income Taxes section of this MD&A.

The Company expects that its adjusted effective tax rate for additionalfuture periods will be approximately 20%. The effective tax rate continues to be subject to future tax law changes both in the U.S. and in foreign jurisdictions. See the risk factor entitled "Tax rates applicable to the Company may change" in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors for more information.

Foreign Currency Translation

Aflac Japan’s premiums and a significant portion of its investment income are received in yen, and its claims and most expenses are paid in yen. Aflac Japan purchases yen-denominated assets and U.S. dollar-denominated assets, which may be hedged to yen, to support yen-denominated policy liabilities. These and other yen-denominated financial statement items are, however, translated into dollars for financial reporting purposes. The Company translates Aflac Japan’s yen-denominatedYen-denominated income statement intoaccounts are translated to U.S. dollars using the weighted average Japanese yen/U.S. dollar foreign exchange rate for the reporting period, except realized gains and losses on securities transactions which are translated at the Company translates its yen-denominatedexchange rate on the trade date of each transaction. Yen-denominated balance sheet accounts are translated to U.S. dollars using the spot Japanese yen/U.S. dollar foreign exchange rate at the end of the reporting period.

Due to the size of Aflac Japan, whose functional currency is the Japanese yen, fluctuations in the yen/dollar exchange rate can have a significant effect on the Company's reported results. In periods when the yen weakens, translating yen into dollars results in fewer dollars being reported. When the yen strengthens, translating yen into dollars results in more dollars being reported. Consequently, yen weakening has the effect of suppressing current period results in relation to the comparable prior period, while yen strengthening has the effect of magnifying current period results in relation to the comparable prior period. Management evaluates the Company's financial performance both including and excluding the impact of foreign currency translation to monitor, respectively, cumulative currency impacts on book value and the currency-neutral operating performance over time.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS BY SEGMENT
U.S. GAAP financial reporting requires that a company report financial and descriptive information about operating segments in its annual and interim period financial statements. Furthermore, the Company is required to report a measure of segment profit or loss, certain revenue and expense items, and segment assets. Aflac'sThe Company's insurance business consists of two segments: Aflac Japan and Aflac U.S. Aflac Japan is the principal contributor to consolidated earnings. BusinessesIn addition, the Parent Company, other business units that are not individually reportable, such as the Parent Company, asset management subsidiaries and business activities, including reinsurance retrocession activities, not included in Aflac Japan or Aflac U.S. are included in the Corporate and other segment.other. See the Item 1. Business section of this Form 10-K for a summary of each segment's products and distribution channels,channels.



39

Consistent with U.S. GAAP guidance for segment reporting, pretax adjusted earnings is the Company's U.S. GAAP measure of segment performance. The Company believes that a presentation of this measure is vitally important to an understanding of the underlying profitability drivers and trends of its business. Additional performance measures used to evaluate the financial condition and performance of the Company's segments are listed below.

Operating Ratios
New Annualized Premium Sales
New Money Yield
Return on Average Invested Assets
Average Weekly Producer

For additional information on the Company’s performance measures included in this MD&A, see the Glossary of Selected Terms found directly following Part IV. See Note 2 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the reconciliation of segment results to the Company's consolidated U.S. GAAP results and additional information.

AFLAC JAPAN SEGMENT

Aflac Japan Pretax Adjusted Earnings

Changes in Aflac Japan's pretax adjusted earnings and profit margins are primarily affected by morbidity, mortality, expenses, persistency and investment yields. The following table presents a summary of operating results for Aflac Japan for the years ended December 31.

Aflac Japan Summary of Operating Results

(In millions)20222021
Net earned premiums$9,548 $11,853 
Net investment income: (1)
Yen-denominated investment income1,140 1,262 
U.S. dollar-denominated investment income1,641 1,845 
Net investment income2,782 3,107 
Amortized hedge costs related to certain foreign currency
   exposure management strategies
112 76 
Adjusted net investment income2,669 3,031 
Other income (loss)35 41 
Total adjusted revenues12,252 14,925 
Benefits and claims, net6,565 7,963 
Adjusted expenses:
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs547 653 
Insurance commissions563 706 
Insurance and other expenses1,520 1,849 
Total adjusted expenses2,630 3,208 
Total benefits and adjusted expenses9,195 11,171 
Pretax adjusted earnings$3,056 $3,754 
Weighted-average yen/dollar exchange rate130.17 109.79 
  In DollarsIn Yen
Percentage change over previous period:2022202120222021
Net earned premiums(19.4)%(6.4)%(4.2)%(3.9)%
Adjusted net investment income(11.9)14.0 5.5 17.6 
Total adjusted revenues(17.9)(2.9)(2.2)(.2)
Pretax adjusted earnings(18.6)15.0 (3.1)18.5 
(1) Net interest cash flows from derivatives associated with certain investment strategies of $(86) and $(33) in 2022 and 2021, respectively, have been reclassified from net investment gains (losses) and included in adjusted earnings as a component of net investment income.


40



Aflac Japan Summary of Operating Results
(In millions)2019 2018 
Net premium income$12,772
 $12,762
 
Net investment income:    
Yen-denominated investment income1,307
 1,283
 
U.S. dollar-denominated investment income1,446
 1,356
 
Net investment income2,753
 2,639
 
Amortized hedge costs related to certain foreign currency
exposure management strategies
257
 236
 
Net investment income, less amortized hedge costs2,496
 2,403
 
Other income (loss)45
 41
 
Total adjusted revenues15,313
 15,206
 
Benefits and claims, net8,877
 8,913
 
Adjusted expenses:    
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs709
 710
 
Insurance commissions731
 735
 
Insurance and other expenses1,734
 1,640
 
Total adjusted expenses3,174
 3,085
 
Total benefits and adjusted expenses12,051
 11,998
 
Pretax adjusted earnings$3,261
 $3,208
 
Weighted-average yen/dollar exchange rate109.07
 110.39
 
  In Dollars In Yen
Percentage change over previous period:2019 2018 2019 2018 
Net premium income.1%
.1%
(1.1)% (1.5)% 
Net investment income, less amortized
  hedge costs
3.9
 7.5
 2.2
 5.5
 
Total adjusted revenues.7
 1.2
 (.6) (.5) 
Pretax adjusted earnings1.7
 5.0
 .2
 3.1
 
In yen terms, Aflac Japan's net premium incomeearned premiums decreased in 2019, primarily2022, mainly due to limited-pay products reaching premium paid-up status. Netstatus and a slightly declining in force. Adjusted net investment income, net of amortized hedge costs,in yen terms, increased in 20192022 primarily due to increased investmentsincreases in floating rate income earned from U.S. dollar-denominated floating rateinvestment that were driven by stronger dollar exchange rates, increasing interest rates, and higher income from make whole payments received on called securities, which were partially offset by lower income from alternative assets and $25 million of income relatedhigher hedge costs. The decrease in pretax adjusted earnings in yen was primarily due to a partial calldecrease in revenues and an increase in the benefit ratio resulting from a wider scope of a concentrated yen-denominated exposure.

"deemed hospitalization" that was in effect through most of the third quarter of 2022.

Annualized premiums in force at December 31, 2019,2022, were ¥1.49¥1.30 trillion, compared with ¥1.53¥1.36 trillion in 2018.2021. The decrease in annualized premiums in force in yen of 2.5%4.4% in 20192022 and 1.6%4.7% in 20182021 was driven primarily by limited-pay products reaching paid up status.status and lower sales as a result of pandemic conditions. Annualized premiums in force, translated into dollars at respective year-end exchange rates, were $13.6$9.8 billion in 20192022 and $13.8$11.8 billion in 2018.2021. As of December 31, 2022, Aflac Japan exceeded 23 million individual policies in force in Japan. Aflac Japan continued to be the number one seller of cancer insurance policies in Japan throughout 2022, with more than 14 million cancer policies in force as of December 31, 2022.

Aflac Japan's investment portfolios include U.S. dollar-denominated securities and reverse-dual currency securities (yen-denominated debt securities with dollar coupon payments). In years when the yen strengthens in relation to the dollar, translating Aflac Japan's U.S. dollar-denominated investment income into yen lowers growth rates for net investment income, total adjusted revenues, and pretax adjusted earnings in yen terms. In years when the yen weakens, translating U.S. dollar-denominated investment income into yen magnifies growth rates for net investment income, total adjusted revenues, and pretax adjusted earnings in yen terms.

The following table illustrates the effect of translating Aflac Japan's U.S. dollar-denominated investment income and related items into yen by comparing certain segment results with those that would have been reported had dollar/yenforeign currency exchange rates remained unchanged from the prior year. Amounts excluding foreign currency impact on U.S. dollar-denominated investment income a non-U.S. GAAP financial measure, were determined using the average dollar/yenforeign currency exchange rate for the comparable prior year period. See non-U.S. GAAP financial measures defined above.

41



Aflac Japan Percentage Changes Over Prior Year
(Yen Operating Results)
For the Years Ended December 31,
  Including Foreign
Currency Changes
Excluding Foreign
Currency Changes
  2022202120222021
Adjusted net investment income5.5 %17.6 %(5.0)%15.6 %
Total adjusted revenues(2.2)(.2)(4.3)(.5)
Pretax adjusted earnings(3.1)18.5 (11.3)16.9 
  Including Foreign
Currency Changes
 Excluding Foreign
Currency Changes
  2019 2018  2019 2018 
Net investment income, less
amortized hedge costs
2.2 % 5.5 %  2.9 % 6.4 % 
Total adjusted revenues(.6) (.5)  (.5) (.3) 
Pretax adjusted earnings.2
 3.1
  .7
 3.7
 

The following table presents a summary of operating ratios in yen terms for Aflac Japan for the years ended December 31.
Ratios to total adjusted revenues:20222021
Benefits and claims, net53.6 %53.3 %
Adjusted expenses:
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs4.5 4.4 
Insurance commissions4.6 4.7 
Insurance and other expenses12.4 12.4 
Total adjusted expenses21.5 21.5 
Pretax adjusted earnings24.9 25.2 
Ratios to total premiums:
Benefits and claims, net68.9 %67.2 %
Adjusted expenses:
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs5.7 5.5 



41

Ratios to total adjusted revenues:2019 2018 
Benefits and claims, net58.0% 58.6% 
Adjusted expenses:    
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs4.6
 4.7
 
Insurance commissions4.8
 4.8
 
Insurance and other expenses11.3
 10.8
 
Total adjusted expenses20.7
 20.3
 
Pretax adjusted earnings21.3
 21.1
 
Ratios to total premiums:    
Benefits and claims, net69.5% 69.9% 
Adjusted expenses:    
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs5.5
 5.6
 

In 2019,2022, the benefit ratio decreased,to total premiums increased, compared to the prior year,with 2021, primarily due to a decrease in total premiums and higher third sector benefits due substantially to an increase in medical hospitalization claims as a result of a wider scope of "deemed hospitalization" related to COVID-19, partially offset by the continued change in mix of first and third sector business as first sector products become paid-up.business. In 2019,2022, the adjusted expense ratio increased mainly due to lower premium income from paid-up first sector productswas flat, compared with 2021, reflecting the decrease in total adjusted revenues and higher expenses for advanced technology implementation.an offsetting decrease in total adjusted expenses. In total for 2019,2022, the pretax adjusted profit margin (calculated by dividingdecreased when compared with 2021, primarily due to lower adjusted earnings by adjusted revenues) increased reflecting continued strength inrevenues, a higher benefit ratiosratio and favorable net investment income. For 2020, the Company anticipates the Aflac Japan pretax adjusted profit margin (calculated by dividing adjusted earnings by adjusted revenues) to remain stable. For further information, see the 2020 Outlook section of this MD&A.a flat expense ratio.

Aflac Japan Sales

The following table presents Aflac Japan's new annualized premium sales for the years ended December 31.
  In DollarsIn Yen
(In millions of dollars and billions of yen)2022202120222021
New annualized premium sales$416 $499 ¥54.8 ¥54.8 
Increase (decrease) over prior period(16.7)%4.6 %.0 %7.7 %
  In DollarsIn Yen
(In millions of dollars and billions of yen)2019 2018 2019 2018 
New annualized premium sales$731
 $869
 ¥79.7
 ¥95.9
 
Increase (decrease) over prior period(15.9)% 2.7% (16.9)% 1.1% 

In 2022, new annualized premium sales on a yen basis were essentially flat, compared with 2021, reflecting constrained sales in the first half of the year due to ongoing pandemic conditions offset by a new cancer product launch in certain distribution channels and first sector product updates in the second half of the year.

The following table details the contributions to Aflac Japan's new annualized premium sales by major insurance product for the years ended December 31.

42



2019 2018 20222021
Cancer59.2%
65.8%
Cancer56.5 %49.2 %
Medical and other health:Medical and other health:
Medical31.0
 25.0
 Medical26.6 37.2 
Income support1.2
 1.8
 Income support1.3 .5 
Ordinary life:    
Life insurance:Life insurance:
Traditional life (1)
Traditional life (1)
8.1 9.0 
WAYS.5
 .5
 WAYS3.5 .8 
Child endowment.2
 .3
 Child endowment.3 .3 
Other ordinary life (1)
7.4
 6.1
 
Other.5
 .5
 Other3.7 3.0 
Total100.0% 100.0%  Total100.0 %100.0 %
(1) Includes term and whole life

The foundation of Aflac Japan's product portfolio has been, and continues to be, third sector products, which include cancer, medical, and income support, insurance products. Aflac Japan has been focusing more on promotion of cancer and medicalnursing care insurance products in this low-interest-rate environment. These products are less interest-rate sensitive and more profitable compared to first sector savings products. With continued cost pressure on Japan’s health care system, the Company expects the need for third sector products will continue to rise in the future and that the medical and cancer insurance products Aflac Japan provides will continue to be an important part of its product portfolio.

Sales of protection-type Moreover, in November 2022, Aflac Japan refreshed its first sector savings-type products WAYS and thirdChild Endowment and began to actively promote sales of these products after having curtailed sales of both products beginning in 2013. The refreshment of these first sector products onposition Aflac Japan for potential future long-term sales opportunities by marketing these products to a yen basis decreased 16.8% in 2019, compared with 2018. Earned premium growth for third and first sector protection products was 1.3%, which was consistent with the Company's expectation. The decline in sales primarily reflected reduced sales of cancer insurance through the Japan Post channel following the 2018 launchyounger demographic as well as potential cross-selling opportunities of Aflac Japan's revised cancer insurance product. In addition, the approach to refreshing the medical insurance product in 2019 took a rider versus whole policy approach. This was designed for improved economics but naturally resulted in lower reported sales. Additional factors include a change in corporate tax law, which slowed the pace of certain third sector medical products and some cancer products in both our associate channel and the bank channel, as well as increased competition from large life insurers who are increasing their focus on the third sector.products.

Sales of Aflac Japan cancer products in the Japan Post Group channel experienced a material decline beginning in August 2019 which2019. Japan Post Group resumed proactive sales of cancer insurance policies on April 1, 2021 and Aflac Japan continues to strengthen the strategic alliance. In April 2022, approximately 10,000 employees of Japan Post Co. were transferred to Japan Post Insurance. Japan Post Group has informed Aflac Japan that the transferred employees' responsibilities will include sales of Japan Post Insurance products and Aflac Japan cancer products but will not include sales of other financial products. The Company expects continued into 2020.collaboration to further position both companies for long-term growth and a gradual improvement of Japan Post Group cancer insurance sales in the intermediate term. For 2019, salesexample, in 2021 and 2022, Aflac Japan observed an increase in the number of proposals to potential customers in the Japan Post Group channel, declined by approximately 50.0% compared with 2018. The Company expects very little sales production inand the Japan Post channel duringGroup continues to conduct a nationwide campaign to improve certain sales process practices. For additional information, see the first half of 2020 and is uncertain with regard to production during the second halfrisk factor entitled "Sales of the year. SeeCompany's products and


42

services are dependent on its ability to attract, retain and support a network of qualified sales associates, brokers and employees in the 2020 Outlook section of this MD&A for information on U.S. and sales associates and other distribution partners in Japan," in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors.

Aflac Japan earned premium expectations.continues to promote digital and web-based sales to groups and use of its system that enables smart device-based insurance application by allowing the customer and an Aflac Japan operator to see the same screen through their smart devices. Further, Aflac Japan continues to utilize its virtual sales tool that enables online consultations and policy applications to be completed entirely online.

Independent corporate agencies and individual agencies contributed 45.7% of totalThe following table details the contributions to Aflac Japan's new annualized premium sales by agency type for Aflac Japan in 2019, compared with 40.1% in 2018. Affiliated corporate agencies, which includethe years ended December 31.
20222021
Independent corporate and individual49.5 %51.1 %
Affiliated corporate (1)
46.5 43.7 
Bank4.0 5.2 
    Total100.0 %100.0 %
(1) Includes Japan Post, contributed 50.0% of total new annualized premium sales in 2019, compared with 55.3% in 2018. Japan Post offers Aflac's cancer insurance products in more than 20,000 postal outlets. Notwithstanding the recent reduction in sales of Aflac Japan's cancer products in the Japan Post channel, the Company believes this alliance with Japan Post hasDai-ichi Life and will benefit its cancer insurance sales over the long term. Daido Life

In 2019,2022, Aflac Japan recruited 7738 new sales agencies. At December 31, 2019,2022, Aflac Japan was represented by more than 9,000approximately 7,400 sales agencies, with more than 109,000approximately 110,000 licensed sales associates employed by those agencies. The number of sales agencies has declined in recent years due to Aflac Japan's focus on supporting agencies with strong management frameworks, high productivity and more producing agents.

At December 31, 2019,2022, Aflac Japan had agreements to sell its products at 367359 banks, approximately 90% of the total number of banks in Japan. Bank channel sales accounted for 4.3% of new annualized premium sales in 2019 for Aflac Japan, compared with 4.6% in 2018.

Strategic Alliance with Japan Post Holdings

OnAs previously reported, on December 19, 2018, the Parent Company and Aflac Japan entered into a Basic Agreement with Japan Post Holdings Co., Ltd., a Japanese corporation.corporation (Japan Post Holdings). Pursuant to the terms of the Basic Agreement, Japan Post Holdings agreed to form a capital relationship with the Parent Company, andamong other items, Japan Post Holdings and Aflac Japan agreed to reconfirm existing initiatives regarding cancer insurance and to consider new joint initiatives. In June 2021, the Parent Company, Aflac Japan and Japan Post Group agreed to pursue several specific initiatives including leveragingtoward building a "'Co-creation Platform' to support customers and local communities," consistent with Japan Post Group's medium-term management plan announced in May 2021. The initiatives are directed at, among other items, the promotion of Aflac Japan cancer insurance, digital technology in various processes, cooperation in new product development to promote customer-centric business management, cooperation in domestic and/or overseas business expansiontransformation within the Japan Post Group, and joint investment in third party entities and cooperation regarding asset management.certain diversity efforts.


43



OnAs previously reported, on February 28, 2019, the Parent Company entered a Shareholders Agreement with Japan Post Holdings, J&A Alliance Holdings Corporation, a Delaware corporation, solely in its capacity as trustee of J&A Alliance Trust, a New York voting trust (Trust), and General Incorporated Association J&A Alliance, a Japanese general incorporated association. PursuantAccording to the terms of the Shareholders Agreement, the Trust will use commercially reasonable efforts to acquire, through open market or private block purchases in the U.S., beneficial ownership of approximately 7% of the outstanding shares of the Parent Company’s common stock within a period of 12 months following the date the Trust begins acquiring such stock. On May 7, 2019, a press release issuedSchedule 13G/A filed by Japan Post Holdings announced that purchases of shareswith the SEC on January 6, 2021, the Trust had beneficially acquired 7.45% of the outstanding Aflac Incorporated common shares as of December 31, 2020. Japan Post Holdings is the sole beneficiary of the Trust. According to a Form 13F filed by Japan Post Holdings with the SEC on November 2, 2022, Japan Post Holdings owned 52.3 million Aflac Incorporated common shares as of September 30, 2022.

On May 1, 2020, the Parent Company’sCompany filed a registration statement on Form S-3 that registered the sale of its common stock commenced on April 29, 2019 throughfrom time to time by J&A Alliance Holdings Corporation in its capacity as trustee of the Trust. The filing was made strictly pursuant to a contractual requirement contained in the Shareholders Agreement. Notwithstanding the filing of the Form S-3, the Trust and that it plannedcontinues to complete such purchases within Japan Post’s fiscal year 2019 (which ends March 31, 2020).

The Trust has agreed notbe subject to own more than 10% of the Parent Company’s outstanding sharesa lockup period for a period expiring on the earlier of four years after the Trust acquiresacquired 7% of such shares, five years after it acquires 5% of such shares, or ten years after the Trust begins acquiring the Parent Company’s stock.Company's outstanding shares. After expiration of such period, the Trust has agreed not to own more than the greater of 10% of the Parent Company’s outstanding shares or such shares representing 22.5% of the voting rights in the Parent Company.

In light of the fact that the shares acquired by the Trust, like all Aflac Incorporated common shares, will be eligible for 10-for-1 voting rights after being held for 48 consecutive months, the Shareholders Agreement further provides for voting restrictions that effectively limit the trustee’s voting rights to no more than 20% of the voting rights in the Parent Company and further restrict the trustee’s voting rights with respect to certain change in control transactions. Japan Post Holdings


43

will not have a Board seat on the Parent Company’s Board of Directors and will not have rights to control, manage or intervene in the management of the Parent Company.

As of December 31, 2019, all regulatory approvals expressly set forth in the Shareholders Agreement have been obtained. The Shareholders Agreement requires the parties to use reasonable best efforts to cooperate in connection with any ongoing regulatory matters related to or arising from the Trust’s acquisition or ownership or control of the shares of Company Common Stock, including any applications or filings in connection with a direct or indirect acquisition of control of or merger with an insurer by the Company or its affiliates. The foregoing is subject to and qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the Basic Agreement, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 19, 2018, and the Shareholders Agreement, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit 10.50 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed April 26, 2019, and the terms of which exhibitexhibits are incorporated herein by reference.

Aflac Japan Investments

The level of investment income in yen is affected by available cash flow from operations, the timing of investing the cash flow, yields on new investments, the effect of yen/dollar exchange rates on U.S. dollar-denominated investment income, and other factors.

As part of the Company's portfolio management and asset allocation process, Aflac Japan invests in yen and U.S. dollar-denominated investments. Yen-denominated investments primarily consist of JGBs, and public and private fixed maturity securities and public equity securities. Aflac Japan's U.S. dollar-denominated investments include fixed maturity investments and growth assets, including public equity securities and alternative investments in limited partnerships or similar investment vehicles. Aflac Japan has been investing in both publicly-traded and privately originated U.S. dollar-denominated investment-grade and below-investment-grade fixed maturity securities and loan receivables, and has entered into foreign currency forwards and options to hedge the currency risk on the fair value of a portion of the U.S. dollar investments.

The following table details the investment purchases for Aflac Japan for the years ended December 31.

(In millions)20222021
Yen-denominated:
  Fixed maturity securities:
     Japan government and agencies$0 $1,208 
     Private placements854 695 
     Other fixed maturity securities113 171 
  Equity securities398 216 
  Other investments22 10 
        Total yen-denominated$1,387 $2,300 
U.S. dollar-denominated:
  Fixed maturity securities:
     Other fixed maturity securities$559 $1,963 
     Infrastructure debt347 52 
     Collateralized loan obligations498 216 
  Equity securities22 
  Commercial mortgage and other loans:
     Transitional real estate loans1,645 1,768 
     Commercial mortgage loans0 31 
     Middle market loans1,203 2,428 
  Other investments391 404 
        Total U.S. dollar-denominated$4,666 $6,870 
            Total Aflac Japan purchases$6,053 $9,170 
44



(In millions) 2019 2018 
Yen-denominated:     
  Fixed maturity securities:     
     Japan government and agencies $583
 $3,895
 
     Private placements 1,122
 1,185
 
     Other fixed maturity securities 542
 796
 
  Equity securities 212
 221
 
        Total yen-denominated $2,459
 $6,097
 
      
U.S. dollar-denominated:     
  Fixed maturity securities:     
     Other fixed maturity securities $2,767
 $1,299
 
     Infrastructure debt 66
 0
 
     Bank loans 0
 346
 
  Equity securities 58
 120
 
  Commercial mortgage and other loans:     
     Transitional real estate loans 1,846
 3,168
 
     Commercial mortgage loans 565
 13
 
     Middle market loans 1,442
 839
 
  Other investments 145
 314
 
        Total dollar-denominated $6,889
 $6,099
 
            Total Aflac Japan purchases $9,348
 $12,196
 

See the Investments section of this MD&A for further discussion of these investment programs, and see Notes 1, 3 and 4 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information regarding loans and loan receivables.

Funds available for investment include cash flows from operations, investment income, and funds generated from maturities, redemptions, securities lending, and other securities transactions. Securities lending is also used from time to time to accelerate the availability of funds for investment. Purchases of securities from period to period are determined


44

based on multiple objectives including appropriate portfolio diversification, the relative value of a potential investment and availability of investment opportunities, liquidity, credit and other risk factors while adhering to the Company's investment policy guidelines.

The following table presents the results of Aflac Japan's investment yields for the years ended and as of December 31.
2019 2018 20222021
Total purchases for the period (in millions) (1)
$9,203
 $11,882
 
Total purchases for the period (in millions) (1)
$5,640 $8,756 
New money yield (1),(2)
3.83% 3.06% 
New money yield (1),(2)
4.48 %3.50 %
Return on average invested assets (3)
2.33
 2.33
 
Return on average invested assets (3)
2.78 2.72 
Portfolio book yield, including U.S. dollar-denominated investments, end of period (1)
2.64% 2.61% 
Portfolio book yield, including U.S. dollar-denominated investments, end of period (1),(2)
Portfolio book yield, including U.S. dollar-denominated investments, end of period (1),(2)
3.06 %2.60 %
(1) Includes fixed maturity securities, commercial mortgage and other loans, equity securities, and excludes alternative investments in limited partnerships
(2) Reported on a gross yield basis; excludes investment expenses, external management fees, and amortized hedge costs
(3) Net of investment expenses and amortized hedge costs, year-to-date number reflected on a quarterly average basis

The increase in the Aflac Japan new money yield in 20192022 was primarily due to decreased allocations to lower yielding yen-denominated asset classes.increases in U.S. interest rates.

See Notes 3, 4 and 5 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements and the Investments sectionand Hedging Activities sections of this MD&A for additional information on the Company's investments and hedging strategies.


45



AFLAC U.S. SEGMENT

Aflac U.S. Pretax Adjusted Earnings

Changes in Aflac U.S. pretax adjusted earnings and profit margins are primarily affected by morbidity, mortality, expenses, persistency and investment yields. The following table presents a summary of operating results for Aflac U.S. for the years ended December 31.
Aflac U.S. Summary of Operating Results 
(In millions)20222021
Net earned premiums$5,570 $5,614 
Adjusted net investment income (1)
755 754 
Other income161 121 
Total adjusted revenues6,486 6,489 
Benefits and claims2,442 2,447 
Adjusted expenses:
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs605 517 
Insurance commissions553 550 
Insurance and other expenses1,562 1,498 
Total adjusted expenses2,720 2,564 
Total benefits and adjusted expenses5,162 5,011 
Pretax adjusted earnings$1,324 $1,478 
Percentage change over previous period:
Net earned premiums(.8)%(2.5)%
Adjusted net investment income.1 7.0 
Total adjusted revenues.0 (1.2)
Pretax adjusted earnings(10.4)16.6 
(1) Net interest cash flows from derivatives associated with certain investment strategies of $(4) and $2 in 2022 and 2021, respectively, have been reclassified from net investment gains (losses) and included in adjusted earnings as a component of net investment income.

In 2022, Aflac U.S. net earned premiums decreased, primarily due to lower persistency. Other income increased in 2022 due to an increase in fee income. The decrease in pretax adjusted earnings was driven primarily by an increase in


45

(In millions)2019 2018 
Net premium income$5,808
 $5,708
 
Net investment income720
 727
 
Other income22
 8
 
Total adjusted revenues6,550
 6,443
 
Benefits and claims2,871
 2,887
 
Adjusted expenses:    
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs573
 534
 
Insurance commissions590
 585
 
Insurance and other expenses1,244
 1,152
 
Total adjusted expenses2,407
 2,271
 
Total benefits and adjusted expenses5,279
 5,158
 
Pretax adjusted earnings$1,272
 $1,285
 
Percentage change over previous period:    
Net premium income1.8 % 2.6% 
Net investment income(1.0) .8
 
Total adjusted revenues1.7
 2.4
 
Pretax adjusted earnings(1.0) 3.2
 
deferred policy acquisition cost (DAC) amortization associated with lower persistency and an increase in planned spending reflecting, in part, platform and growth investments.

Annualized premiums in force increased 1.1%were essentially flat in 20192022 and 3.0%decreased 1.6% in 2018.2021. Annualized premiums in force at December 31 were $6.3$6.0 billion in 2019, compared with $6.2 billion in 2018.2022 and 2021.

The following table presents a summary of operating ratios for Aflac U.S. for the years ended December 31. 
Ratios to total adjusted revenues:20222021
Benefits and claims37.7 %37.7 %
Adjusted expenses:
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs9.3 8.0 
Insurance commissions8.5 8.5 
Insurance and other expenses24.1 23.1 
Total adjusted expenses41.9 39.5 
Pretax adjusted earnings20.4 22.8 
Ratios to total premiums:
Benefits and claims43.8 %43.6 %
Adjusted expenses:
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs10.9 9.2 
Ratios to total adjusted revenues:2019 2018 
Benefits and claims43.8% 44.8%
Adjusted expenses:    
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs8.7
 8.3
 
Insurance commissions9.0
 9.1
 
Insurance and other expenses19.0
 17.9
 
Total adjusted expenses36.7
 35.2
 
Pretax adjusted earnings19.4
 19.9
 
Ratios to total premiums:    
Benefits and claims49.4
 50.6
 
Adjusted expenses:    
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs9.9
 9.4
 


The benefit ratio decreasedto total premiums increased slightly in 2019,2022, compared with 2018, primarily due to somewhat elevated lapses and a change in business mix from2021, reflecting higher loss ratio,incurred claims, mostly offset by reserve building productsreleases related to lower loss ratio, guaranteed issue products.persistency. The adjusted expense ratio increased in 2019,2022, compared with 2018,2021, primarily due to deferred policy acquisition costs (DAC) capitalization related tohigher DAC amortization associated with lower than anticipated sales as well as anticipatedpersistency and higher planned spending increases reflecting ongoing investments in the U.S. platform, distribution, and customer experience. Both the lower benefit and higher DAC amortization ratios were also impacted by increases in lapses as a result of large case volatility and replacement of an administrative partner. These items impacted persistency in the short-term but are expected to drive profitable earned premium growth in future periods. platform.The pretax adjusted

46



profit margin declineddecreased in 20192022 when compared with 2018,2021, primarily due to the higher adjusted expense ratios, offset somewhat by lower benefit ratios. For expectations for 2020, see the 2020 Outlook section of this MD&A.ratio.

Aflac U.S. Sales

The following table presents Aflac's U.S. new annualized premium sales for the years ended December 31.
(In millions)20222021
New annualized premium sales$1,483 $1,278 
Increase (decrease) over prior period16.1 %16.9 %
(In millions)2019 2018 
New annualized premium sales$1,580
 $1,601
 
Increase (decrease) over prior period(1.3)% 3.2% 

New annualized premium sales for accident insurance increased 5.2%; disability sales increased 28.1%; critical care insurance sales (including cancer insurance) increased 9.6%; hospital indemnity insurance sales increased 8.1%; dental/vision sales increased 32.3%; and life sales increased 36.5% in 2022, compared with 2021. The increase in sales for Aflac U.S. in 2022 reflects continued improvement from investment in growth initiatives as well as productivity gains.
    
The following table details the contributions to Aflac's U.S. new annualized premium sales by major insurance product category for the years ended December 31.
 2019 2018 
Accident28.5% 29.2% 
Short-term disability22.5
 22.7
 
    Critical care (1)
21.9
 22.1
 
Hospital indemnity16.6
 15.8
 
Dental/vision4.4
 4.7
 
Life6.1
 5.5
 
Total100.0% 100.0% 
20222021
Accident22.8 %25.1 %
Disability25.5 23.1 
    Critical care (1)
20.1 21.3 
Hospital indemnity15.3 16.4 
Dental/vision5.8 5.1 
Life10.5 9.0 
Total100.0 %100.0%
(1) Includes cancer, critical illness and hospital intensive care products

New annualized premium sales for accident insurance, the Aflac U.S. leading product category, decreased 3.8%, short-term disability sales decreased 2.4%, critical care insurance sales (including cancer insurance) decreased 2.4%,


46

In 2019,2022, the Aflac U.S. sales forcesforce included an average of approximately 8,2006,200 U.S. agents, including brokers, who were actively producing business on a weekly basis. The Company believes that this average weekly producer equivalent metric allows sales management to monitor progress and needs.needs, as well as serve as a leading indicator of future production capacity. Aflac U.S. believes that during 2021 and 2022, constraints in the labor market limited its recruiting of new sales agents, and that limitations on face-to-face sales opportunities during the COVID-19 pandemic suppressed the development of newly recruited agents into business producers and the productivity of veteran agents and brokers. Aflac U.S. believes that the above factors have acted as a headwind to sales and to growth in the number of average weekly producers. Aflac U.S. remains focused on mitigating and reversing these trends as the U.S. economy continues to recover from the pandemic.

In November 2019, the Company acquired Argus Holdings, LLC andAflac U.S. remains focused on supporting its subsidiary Argus Dental & Vision, Inc. (Argus), a benefits management organization and national network dental and vision company,agency channel, most of which provides a platform for Aflac Dental and Vision. This transaction represents a commitment of $75 million in capital at closingare small businesses, by offering financial support and an additional $21 millionextended value proposition. The Aflac U.S. sales team has pivoted to accommodate preferred enrollment conditions which include realizing sales at the worksite through in-person enrollment, an enrollment call center, video enrollment through co-browsing and self-enrollment. The traditional agent sales team is also using virtual recruiting and training through video conferencing in consideration paid over three yearsorder to maintain or increase the recruiting pipeline. The Aflac U.S. broker sales team is focused on product enhancements, as well as leveraging technology based on the achievement by Argus of certain performance targets. Tampa, Florida will serve as the home for Aflac Dental and Vision. This acquisition is a strategic entry point into the network dental and vision market and is expectedsolutions to provide opportunities for sales growth, improved account penetration and distribution productivity.drive enrollment.

Aflac U.S. Investments
The level of investment income is affected by available cash flow from operations, the timing of investing the cash flow, yields on new investments, and other factors.

As part of the Company's portfolio management and asset allocation process, Aflac U.S. invests in fixed maturity investments and growth assets, including public equity securities and alternative investments in limited partnerships. Aflac U.S. has been investing in both publicly traded and privately originated investment-grade and below-investment-grade fixed maturity securities and loan receivables.

The following table details the investment purchases for Aflac U.S. as of December 31.

(In millions)20222021
Fixed maturity securities:
     Other fixed maturity securities$635 $770 
     Infrastructure debt191 91 
     Collateralized loan obligations199 65 
Equity securities33 213 
Commercial mortgage and other loans:
     Transitional real estate loans342 525 
     Commercial mortgage loans0 276 
     Middle market loans301 190 
Other investments44 45 
        Total Aflac U.S. Purchases$1,745 $2,175 
47



(In millions) 2019 2018 
Fixed maturity securities:     
     Other fixed maturity securities $1,032
 $1,068
 
     Infrastructure debt 119
 97
 
Equity securities 58
 76
 
Commercial mortgage and other loans:     
     Transitional real estate loans 423
 610
 
     Commercial mortgage loans 104
 163
 
     Middle market loans 99
 141
 
Other investments 16
 44
 
        Total Aflac U.S. Purchases $1,851
 $2,199
 

Funds available for investment include cash flows from operations, investment income, and funds generated from maturities, redemptions, and other securities transactions. Purchases of securities from period to period are determined based on multiple objectives, including appropriate portfolio diversification, the relative value of a potential investment and availability of investment opportunities, liquidity, credit and other risk factors while adhering to the Company's investment policy guidelines.



47

The following table presents the results of Aflac's U.S. investment yields for the years ended and as of December 31.
2019 2018 20222021
Total purchases for period (in millions) (1)
$1,835
 $2,155
 
Total purchases for period (in millions) (1)
$1,701 $2,130 
New money yield (1), (2)
4.51% 4.55% 
New money yield (1),(2)
New money yield (1),(2)
5.16 %3.41 %
Return on average invested assets (3)
5.07
 5.16
 
Return on average invested assets (3)
4.72 4.87 
Portfolio book yield, end of period (1)
5.40% 5.55% 
Portfolio book yield, end of period (1),(2)
Portfolio book yield, end of period (1),(2)
5.39 %4.94 %
(1) Includes fixed maturity securities, commercial mortgage and other loans, equity securities, and excludes alternative investments in limited partnerships
(2) Reported on a gross yield basis; excludes investment expenses and external management fees
(3) Net of investment expenses, year-to-date number reflected on a quarterly average basis

The increase in the Aflac U.S. new money yield for the year ended December 31, 2022 was primarily due to increases in U.S. interest rates.

See Note 3 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements and the Market Risks of Financial Instruments - Credit Risk subsection of MD&AItem 7A. for more information regarding the sector concentrations of the Company's investments.


48



CORPORATE AND OTHER

Changes in the pretax adjusted earnings of Corporate and other are primarily affected by investment income. The following table presents a summary operating results for Corporate and other for the years ended December 31.

Corporate and Other Summary of Operating Results
(In millions)20222021
Net earned premiums$145 $180 
Net investment income (loss) (1)
30 (73)
Amortized hedge income related to certain foreign currency
   management strategies
68 57 
Adjusted net investment income98 (16)
Other income24 11 
Total adjusted revenues267 175 
Benefits and claims, net146 166 
Adjusted expenses:
Interest expense162 165 
Other adjusted expenses182 142 
Total adjusted expenses344 307 
Total benefits and adjusted expenses490 473 
Pretax adjusted earnings$(223)$(298)
(In millions)2019 2018 
Premium income$200
 $208
 
Net investment income88
 77
 
Amortized hedge income related to certain foreign currency
   management strategies
89
 36
 
Net investment income, including amortized hedge income177
 113
 
Other income15
 18
 
Total adjusted revenues393
 339
 
Benefits and claims, net194
 199
 
Adjusted expenses:    
Interest expense133
 120
 
Other adjusted expenses137
 159
 
Total adjusted expenses270
 279
 
Total benefits and adjusted expenses464
 478
 
Pretax adjusted earnings$(72) $(139) 
(1) The change in value of federal historic rehabilitation and solar investments in partnerships of $91 and $138 in 2022 and 2021, respectively, is included as a reduction to net investment income. Tax credits on these investments of $83 and $115 in 2022 and 2021, respectively, have been recorded as an income tax benefit in the consolidated statement of earnings. See Note 3 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on these investments.

NetIn 2022, total adjusted revenues increased compared with 2021, primarily due to higher adjusted net investment income benefited from higher interest rates and an increase in amortized hedge income, partially offset by the Company’s enterprise corporate hedging program forimpact of federal tax credit investments and a reduction in net earned premiums as a result of significant yen weakening. Total adjusted expenses increased, as compared to 2021, primarily due to higher expenses associated with employee compensation and benefits and travel. These results also reflect the years ended December 31, 2019impact of foreign currency on net earned premiums and 2018, respectively. See the Hedging Activities subsection of this MD&A for further information on the enterprise corporate hedging program.corresponding benefits.

In December 2018, the Parent Company invested $20 million in Singapore Life Pte. Ltd. (Singapore Life), a digitally-focused life insurance company based in Singapore. The Parent Company made an additional investmentinvests in partnerships that specialize in rehabilitating historic structures or the installation of $16 millionsolar equipment in order to receive federal historic rehabilitation and solar tax credits. These investments are classified as limited partnerships and included in other investments in the second quarterconsolidated balance sheet. The change in value of 2019, bringingeach investment is recorded as a reduction to net investment income. Tax credits generated by these investments are recorded as an income tax benefit in the total investment to $36 million. As partconsolidated statement of the relationship, Aflac entered into a reinsurance agreement on certain protection products with Singapore Life in September 2019. However, the Company does not currently expect the equity investment or the reinsurance agreement to have a material impact on its financial position or resultsearnings.


48



INVESTMENTS

The Company’s investment strategy utilizes disciplined asset and liability management while seeking long-term risk-adjusted investment returns and the delivery of stable income within regulatory and capital objectives, and preserving shareholder value. In attempting to optimally balance these objectives, the Company seeks to maintain on behalf of Aflac Japan a diversified portfolio of yen-denominated investment assets, a U.S. dollar-denominated investment portfolio hedged back to yen and a portfolio of unhedged U.S. dollar-denominated assets. As part of the Company's portfolio management and asset allocation process, Aflac U.S. invests in fixed maturity investments and growth assets, including public equity securities and alternative investments in limited partnerships. Aflac U.S. invests in both publicly traded and privately originated investment-grade and below-investment-grade fixed maturity securities and loans. The Company is also a signatory to the Principles for Responsible Investment, a global framework for incorporating environmental, social and governance (ESG) considerations into investment and ownership decisions.

For additional information concerning the Company's investments, see Notes 3, 4, and 5 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.



49



The following tables detail investments by segment as of December 31.

Investment Securities by Segment
2019 2022
(In millions)Aflac Japan Aflac U.S. Corporate and Other Total(In millions)Aflac JapanAflac U.S.Corporate and Other Total
Available for sale, fixed maturity securities,
at fair value
$75,780
 $13,703
 $1,779
 $91,262
Available for sale, fixed maturity securities,
at fair value
$61,615 $12,231 $1,895 $75,741 
Held to maturity, fixed maturity securities,
at amortized cost
30,085
 0
 0
 30,085
Held to maturity, fixed maturity securities,
at amortized cost (1)
Held to maturity, fixed maturity securities,
at amortized cost (1)
19,056 0 0 19,056 
Equity securities657
 67
 78
 802
Equity securities650 51 390 1,091 
Commercial mortgage and other loans:       Commercial mortgage and other loans:
Transitional real estate loans4,507
 943
 0
 5,450
Commercial mortgage loans1,308
 399
 0
 1,707
Middle market loans2,141
 271
 0
 2,412
Transitional real estate loans (1)
Transitional real estate loans (1)
5,133 1,140 182 6,455 
Commercial mortgage loans (1)
Commercial mortgage loans (1)
1,269 729 15 2,013 
Middle market loans (1)
Middle market loans (1)
4,557 471 0 5,028 
Other investments:       Other investments:
Policy loans234
 16
 0
 250
Policy loans190 24 0 214 
Short-term investments (1)
386
 242
 1
 629
Short-term investments (2)
Short-term investments (2)
319 184 1,029 1,532 
Limited partnerships496
 55
 17
 568
Limited partnerships1,900 208 182 2,290 
Other0
 30
 0
 30
Other0 34 0 34 
Investment in affiliate (3)
Investment in affiliate (3)
0 195 (195)0 
Total investments115,594
 15,726
 1,875
 133,195
Total investments94,689 15,267 3,498 113,454 
Cash and cash equivalents1,674
 417
 2,805
 4,896
Cash and cash equivalents1,601 720 1,622 3,943 
Total investments and cash$117,268
 $16,143
 $4,680
 $138,091
Total investments and cash$96,290 $15,987 $5,120 $117,397 
(1) Net of allowance for credit losses
(2) Includes securities lending collateral
(3) For consolidated reporting, Aflac U.S.'s investment in Aflac Re Bermuda is eliminated in Corporate and other



49

20182021
(In millions)Aflac Japan Aflac U.S. Corporate and Other Total(In millions)Aflac JapanAflac U.S.Corporate and Other Total
Available for sale, fixed maturity securities,
at fair value
$69,409
 $12,132
 $1,354
 $82,895
Available for sale, fixed maturity securities,
at fair value
$81,793 $14,910 $1,993 $98,696 
Held to maturity, fixed maturity securities,
at amortized cost
30,318
 0
 0
 30,318
Held to maturity, fixed maturity securities,
at amortized cost (1)
Held to maturity, fixed maturity securities,
at amortized cost (1)
22,000 22,000 
Equity securities806
 137
 44
 987
Equity securities714 226 663 1,603 
Commercial mortgage and other loans:       Commercial mortgage and other loans:
Transitional real estate loans3,621
 756
 0
 4,377
Commercial mortgage loans763
 301
 0
 1,064
Middle market loans1,144
 334
 0
 1,478
Transitional real estate loans (1)
Transitional real estate loans (1)
4,226 1,020 45 5,291 
Commercial mortgage loans (1)
Commercial mortgage loans (1)
1,217 669 1,894 
Middle market loans (1)
Middle market loans (1)
4,297 304 4,601 
Other investments:       Other investments:
Policy loans219
 13
 0
 232
Policy loans216 20 236 
Short-term investments (1)
0
 141
 11
 152
Short-term investments (2)
Short-term investments (2)
590 302 834 1,726 
Limited partnerships333
 37
 7
 377
Limited partnerships1,534 169 155 1,858 
Other0
 26
 0
 26
Other22 22 
Total investments106,613
 13,877
 1,416
 121,906
Total investments116,587 17,642 3,698 137,927 
Cash and cash equivalents1,779
 641
 1,917
 4,337
Cash and cash equivalents2,053 681 2,317 5,051 
Total investments and cash$108,392
 $14,518
 $3,333
 $126,243
Total investments and cash$118,640 $18,323 $6,015 $142,978 
(1) Net of allowance for credit losses
(2) Includes securities lending collateral

The ratings of the Company's securities referenced in the table below are based on the ratings designations provided by major NRSROsrating organizations such as Moody's, Standard & Poor's and Fitch or, if not rated, are determined based on the Company's internal analysis of such securities. When the ratings issued by the rating agencies differ, the Company utilizes the second lowest rating when three or more rating agency ratings are available or the lowest rating when only two rating agency ratings are available.

50




The distributions of fixed maturity securities the Company owns, by credit rating, as of December 31 were as follows:

Composition of Fixed Maturity Securities Portfolio by Credit Rating
  20222021
 Amortized
Cost
  Fair    
  Value    
Amortized
Cost
  Fair    
  Value    
AAA1.6 %1.5 %1.0 %.9 %
AA5.2 5.3 5.1 5.2 
A68.0 68.1 68.9 68.5 
BBB23.0 22.9 22.5 22.8 
BB or lower2.2 2.2 2.5 2.6 
Total100.0 %100.0 %100.0 %100.0 %
   2019   2018 
 Amortized
Cost
   Fair    
  Value    
 Amortized
Cost
   Fair    
  Value    
AAA 1.1%   1.0%   1.0%   .9% 
AA 4.3
   4.4
   3.9
   4.0
 
A 68.6
   69.8
   67.9
   69.9
 
BBB 23.1
   22.1
   23.2
   21.6
 
BB or lower 2.9
   2.7
   4.0
   3.6
 
Total 100.0%   100.0%   100.0%   100.0% 

As of December 31, 2019,2022, the Company's direct and indirect exposure to securities in its investment portfolio that were guaranteed by third parties was immaterial both individually and in the aggregate.

The following table presents the 10 largest unrealized loss positions in the Company's portfolio as of December 31, 2019.2022.


50

(In millions)Credit
Rating
 Amortized
Cost
 Fair
Value
 Unrealized    
Loss    
Diamond Offshore Drilling Inc. CCC   $64
   $32
   $(32) 
AXA BBB   296
   271
   (25) 
Transocean Inc. CCC   50
   37
   (13) 
Intesa Sanpaolo Spa BBB   142
   132
   (10) 
Baker Hughes Inc. A   123
   114
   (9) 
Kommunal Landspensjonskasse (KLP) BBB   137
   129
   (8) 
Mirvac Group Finance Ltd. A   91
   84
   (7) 
Autostrade Per Litalia Spa BBB   182
   175
   (7) 
Downer Group Finance Pty LTD BBB   91
   85
   (6) 
Chevron Corp. AA   148
   142
   (6) 
(In millions)Credit
Rating
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
Unrealized Loss 
Autostrade Per Litalia SpaBBB$149 $108 $(41)
JP Morgan Chase and Co.A210 171 (39)
KLM Royal Dutch AirlinesB135 96 (39)
Investcorp Capital LimitedBB329 291 (38)
Prologis LPA172 142 (30)
Urban Renaissance AgencyA184 154 (30)
GLP Pte Ltd.BBB113 83 (30)
Banco de ChileA150 127 (23)
Citigroup IncA176 154 (22)
Morgan StanleyA135 113 (22)

Generally, declines in fair values can be a result of changes in interest rates, yen/dollar exchange rate, and changes in net spreads driven by a broad market move or a change in the issuer's underlying credit quality. As theThe Company believes these issuers have the ability to continue making timely payments of principal and interest, the Company views these changes in fair value to be temporary.interest. See the Unrealized Investment Gains and Losses section in Note 3 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussions of unrealized losses related to financial institutions and other corporate investments.
Below-Investment-Grade Securities
The Company's portfolio of below-investment-grade securities includes debt securities purchased while the issuer was rated investment grade plus other loans and bonds purchased as part of an allocation to that segment of the market. The following is the Company's below-investment-grade exposure.exposure at December 31.


51



Below-Investment-Grade Investments
December 31, 2019  2022
(In millions)
Par
Value
 
Amortized
Cost
 
Fair
Value
 
Unrealized
Gain
(Loss)
 (In millions)Par
Value
Amortized
Cost (1)
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Gain
(Loss)
Investcorp Capital Limited$388
 $388
 $452
 $64
 Investcorp Capital Limited$329 $329 $291 $(38)
Republic of South Africa365
 365
 372
 7
 
Barclays Bank PLC183
 115
 157
 42
 
Pemex Project Funding Master TrustPemex Project Funding Master Trust226 226 230 4 
CommerzbankCommerzbank188 145 209 64 
Telecom Italia SpATelecom Italia SpA151 151 178 27 
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines183
 136
 143
 7
 KLM Royal Dutch Airlines151 135 96 (39)
Telecom Italia SpA183
 183
 241
 58
 
Apache CorporationApache Corporation138 110 130 20 
Howmet Aerospace Inc.Howmet Aerospace Inc.100 70 97 27 
IKB Deutsche Industriebank AG118
 51
 102
 51
 IKB Deutsche Industriebank AG98 47 75 28 
Arconic Inc.100
 85
 111
 26
 
EMC Corp.80
 80
 82
 2
 
Generalitat de Catalunya73
 27
 80
 53
 Generalitat de Catalunya60 24 58 34 
Teva Pharmaceuticals68
 66
 61
 (5) 
National Gas Co. Trinidad & TobagoNational Gas Co. Trinidad & Tobago52 50 48 (2)
Other Issuers456
 436
 420
 (16) Other Issuers84 85 69 (16)
Subtotal (1)
2,197
 1,932
 2,221
 289
 
Senior secured bank loans462
 480
 459
 (21) 
Subtotal (2)
Subtotal (2)
1,577 1,372 1,481 109 
High yield corporate bonds726
 723
 755
 32
 High yield corporate bonds785 666 697 31 
Middle market loans, net of reserves (2)
2,455
 2,412
 2,420
 8
 
Middle market loansMiddle market loans4,732 4,562 4,554 (8)
Grand Total$5,840
 $5,547
 $5,855
 $308
  Grand Total$7,094 $6,600 $6,732 $132 
(1) Net of allowance for credit losses
(2) Securities initially purchased as investment grade, but have subsequently been downgraded to below investment grade
(2)
Middle market loans are carried at amortized cost

The Company invests in senior secured bank loans and middle market loans primarily to U.S. corporate borrowers, most of which have below-investment-grade ratings. The objectives of these programsthis program include enhancing the yield on invested assets, achieving further diversification of credit risk, and mitigating the risk of rising interest rates and hedge costs through the acquisition of floating rate assets.


51


The Company maintains an allocation to higher yielding corporate bonds within the Aflac Japan and Aflac U.S. portfolios. Most of these securities were rated below-investment-grade at the time of purchase, but the Company also purchased several that were rated investment grade which, because of market pricing, offer yields commensurate with below-investment-grade risk profiles. The objective of this allocation was to enhance the Company's yield on invested assets and further diversify credit risk. All investments in this program must have a minimum rating at purchase of low BB using the Company's above described rating methodology and are managed by the Company's internal credit portfolio management team.

Fixed Maturity Securities by Sector

The Company maintains diversification in investments by sector to avoid concentrations to any one sector, thus managing exposure risk. The following table shows the distribution of fixed maturities by sector classification as of December 31.

2022
(In millions)
Amortized
Cost (1)
Gross Unrealized GainsGross Unrealized LossesFair Value% of
Total
Government and agencies$43,854 $3,304 $(1,732)$45,426 46.4 %
Municipalities2,590 215 (150)2,655 2.7 
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities2,167 75 (96)2,146 2.3 
Public utilities7,450 545 (288)7,707 7.9 
Electric6,036 456 (197)6,294 6.4 
Natural Gas249 28 (10)267 .3 
Other565 35 (48)553 .6 
Utility/Energy600 26 (33)593 .6 
Sovereign and supranational1,238 113 (17)1,334 1.3 
Banks/financial institutions9,340 595 (636)9,299 9.9 
Banking5,633 434 (364)5,704 6.0 
Insurance1,703 119 (81)1,740 1.8 
Other2,004 42 (191)1,855 2.1 
Other corporate27,886 2,107 (1,609)28,384 29.5 
Basic Industry2,452 263 (112)2,602 2.6 
Capital Goods3,394 180 (226)3,350 3.6 
Communications2,866 284 (109)3,039 3.0 
Consumer Cyclical2,206 184 (71)2,320 2.3 
Consumer Non-Cyclical6,238 383 (362)6,259 6.7 
Energy2,664 330 (85)2,909 2.8 
Other1,371 81 (146)1,306 1.5 
Technology3,534 122 (257)3,399 3.7 
Transportation3,161 280 (241)3,200 3.3 
        Total fixed maturity securities$94,525 $6,954 $(4,528)$96,951 100.0 %

(1) Net of allowance for credit losses
52



 2019 
(In millions) Amortized
Cost
  
% of
Total
 
Government and agencies $53,463    48.8% 
Municipalities 2,414    2.2  
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities 394    .4  
Public utilities 8,194    7.5  
Electric 6,471    5.9  
Natural Gas 303    .3  
Other 695    .6  
Utility/Energy 725    .7  
Sovereign and Supranational 2,042    1.9  
Banks/financial institutions 9,947    9.1  
Banking 6,029    5.5  
Insurance 1,948    1.8  
Other 1,970    1.8  
Other corporate 33,002    30.1  
Basic Industry 3,484    3.2  
Capital Goods 3,187    2.9  
Communications 4,057    3.7  
Consumer Cyclical 3,271    3.0  
Consumer Non-Cyclical 6,280    5.7  
Energy 4,281    3.9  
Other 1,464    1.3  
Technology 3,129    2.9  
Transportation 3,849    3.5  
        Total fixed maturity securities $109,456    100.0% 
Securities by Type of Issuance
The Company has investments in both publicly and privately issued securities. The Company's ability to sell either type of security is a function of overall market liquidity which is impacted by, among other things, the amount of outstanding securities of a particular issuer or issuance, trading history of the issue or issuer, overall market conditions, and idiosyncratic events affecting the specific issue or issuer.


53


52


The following table details investment securities by type of issuance as of December 31.

Investment Securities by Type of Issuance
 2019  2018  20222021
(In millions)Amortized
Cost
 Fair   
Value   
 Amortized
Cost
 Fair  
Value  
(In millions)
Amortized
Cost (1)
Fair   
Value   
Amortized
Cost (1)
Fair  
Value  
Publicly issued securities:           Publicly issued securities:
Fixed maturity securities $89,625
  $105,557
  $83,482
 $93,255
 Fixed maturity securities$77,176 $79,090 $88,552 $103,034 
Equity securities 717
  717
  936
 936
 Equity securities882 882 950 950 
Total publicly issued 90,342
  106,274
  84,418
 94,191
  Total publicly issued78,058 79,972 89,502 103,984 
Privately issued securities: (1)
           
Fixed maturity securities 19,831
(2 
) 
 23,299
(2 
) 
 23,692
 26,362
 
Privately issued securities: (2)
Privately issued securities: (2)
Fixed maturity securities (3)
Fixed maturity securities (3)
17,349 17,861 18,817 22,531 
Equity securities 85
  85
  51
 51
 Equity securities209 209 653 653 
Total privately issued 19,916
  23,384
  23,743
 26,413
  Total privately issued17,558 18,070 19,470 23,184 
Total investment securities $110,258
  $129,658
  $108,161
 $120,604
  Total investment securities$95,616 $98,042 $108,972 $127,168 
(1) Net of allowance for credit losses
(2) Primarily consists of securities owned by Aflac Japan
(2) (3) Excludes Rule 144A securities starting in the first quarter of 2019

The following table details the Company's reverse-dual currency securities as of December 31.

Reverse-Dual Currency Securities(1)
(Amortized cost, in millions)20222021
Privately issued reverse-dual currency securities$4,049 $4,784 
Publicly issued collateral structured as reverse-dual currency securities1,383 1,596 
Total reverse-dual currency securities$5,432 $6,380 
Reverse-dual currency securities as a percentage of total investment
   securities
5.7 %5.9 %
(Amortized cost, in millions)2019 2018 
Privately issued reverse-dual currency securities$4,993
 $5,120
 
Publicly issued collateral structured as reverse-dual currency securities1,678
 1,657
 
Total reverse-dual currency securities$6,671
 $6,777
 
Reverse-dual currency securities as a percentage of total investment
securities
6.1% 6.3% 
(1)Principal payments in yen and interest payments in dollars

Aflac Japan has a portfolio of privately issued securities to better match liability characteristics and secure higher yields than those available on Japanese government or other public corporate bonds. Aflac Japan’s investments in yen-denominated privately issued securities consist primarily of non-Japanese issuers, are rated investment grade at purchase and have longer maturities, thereby allowing the Company to improve asset/liability matching and overall investment returns. These securities are generally either privately negotiated arrangements or issued under medium-term note programs and have standard documentation commensurate with credit ratings of the issuer, except when internal credit analysis indicates that additional protective and/or event-risk covenants were required. Many of these investments have protective covenants appropriate to the specific investment. These may include a prohibition of certain activities by the borrower, maintenance of certain financial measures, and specific conditions impacting the payment of the Company's notes.

HEDGING ACTIVITIES

The Company uses derivative contracts to hedge foreign currency exchange rate risk and interest rate risk. The Company uses various strategies, including derivatives, to manage these risks. See item “7A.Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk”Risk for more information about Marketmarket risk and the Company’s use of derivatives.

Derivatives are designed to reduce risk on an economic basis while minimizing the impact on financial results. The Company’s derivatives programs vary depending on the type of risk being hedged. See Note 4 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for:

A description of the Company's derivatives, hedging strategies and underlying risk exposure.
A description of the Company's derivatives, hedging strategies and underlying risk exposure.
Information about the notional amount and fair market value of the Company's derivatives.
The unrealized and realized gains and losses impact on adjusted earnings of derivatives in cash flow, fair value, net investments in foreign operations, or non-qualifying
The unrealized and realized gains and losses impact on adjusted earnings of derivatives in cash flow, fair value, net investments in foreign operations, or non-qualifying hedging relationships.



54


53

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk Hedge Program

The Company has deployed the following hedging strategies to mitigate exposure to foreign currency exchange rate risk:
Aflac Japan hedges U.S. dollar-denominated investments back to yen (see Aflac Japan’s U.S. Dollar-Denominated Hedge Program below).

Aflac Japan maintains certain unhedged U.S. dollar-denominated securities, which serve as an economic currency hedge of a portion of the Company's investment in Aflac Japan hedges U.S. dollar-denominated investments back to yen (see Aflac Japan’s U.S. Dollar-Denominated Hedge Program below).

The Parent Company designates yen-denominated liabilities (notes payable and loans) as non-derivative hedging instruments and designates certain foreign currency forwards and options as derivative hedges of the Company’s net investment in Aflac Japan (see Enterprise Corporate Hedging Program below).

The Parent Company enters into forward and option contracts to accomplish a dual objective of hedging foreign currency exchange rate risk related to dividend payments by its subsidiary, ALIJ, and reducing enterprise-wide hedge costs (see Enterprise Corporate Hedging Program below).

The following table presents metrics related to Aflac Japan's U.S. dollar-denominated hedge program and the Parent Company's enterprise corporate hedging program, including associated amortized hedge costs/income, for the years ended December 31. See the Results of Operations section of this MD&A for the Company's definition of amortized hedge costs/income.
20222021
Aflac Japan:
FX Forwards
   FX forward (sell USD, buy yen) notional at end of period (in billions) (1)
$4.1$6.4
   Weighted average remaining tenor (in months) (2)
.72.6
   Amortized hedge income (cost) for period (in millions)$(44)$(55)
FX Options
FX option notional at the end of period (in billions) (1)
$13.5$11.6
Weighted average remaining tenor (in months) (2)
6.46.0
Amortized hedge income (cost) for period (in millions)$(68)$(22)
Corporate and other (Parent Company):
FX Forwards
   FX forward (buy USD, sell yen) notional at end of period (in billions)(1)
$5.0$5.0
   Weighted average remaining tenor (in months)(2)
10.811.5
   Amortized hedge income (cost) for period (in millions)$71$62
FX Options
FX option notional at the end of period (in billions) (1)
$2.6$1.9
Weighted average remaining tenor (in months) (2)
9.07.3
Amortized hedge income (cost) for period (in millions)$(3)$(5)
(1) Notional is reported net of any offsetting positions within Aflac Japan or the Parent Company, respectively.
(2) Tenor based on period reporting date to settlement date

Amortized hedge costs/income can fluctuate based upon many factors, including the derivative notional amount, the length of time of the derivative contract, changes in both U.S. and Japan interest rates, and supply and demand for dollar funding. Amortized hedge costs/income have fluctuated in recent periods due to changes in the previously mentioned factors.

Aflac Japan’s U.S. Dollar-Denominated Hedge Program below).

Aflac Japan maintains certain unhedged U.S. dollar-denominated securities, which serve as an economic currency hedge of a portion of the Company's investment in Aflac Japan (see Aflac Japan’s U.S. Dollar-Denominated Hedge Program below).

The Parent Company designates yen-denominated liabilities (notes payable and loans) as non-derivative hedging instruments and designates certain foreign currency forwards and options as derivative hedges of the Company’s net investment in Aflac Japan (see Enterprise Corporate Hedging Program below).

The Parent Company enters into forward and option contracts to accomplish a dual objective of hedging foreign currency exchange rate risk related to dividend payments by its subsidiary, ALIJ, and reducing enterprise-wide hedge costs. (see Enterprise Corporate Hedging Program below).

Aflac Japan’s U.S. Dollar-Denominated Hedge Program (U.S. Dollar Program)

Aflac Japan buys U.S. dollar-denominated investments, typically corporate bonds, and hedges them back to yen with foreign currency forwards and options to hedge foreign currency exchange rate risk. This economically creates yen assets that match yen liabilities during the life of the derivative and provides favorable capital relief.treatment under the Japan SMR


54

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
calculations. The currency risk being hedged is generally based on fair value of hedged investments. The following table summarizes the U.S. dollar-denominated investments held by Aflac Japan as of December 31.
20222021
(In millions)
Amortized
Cost (1)
Fair
Value
Amortized
Cost (1)
Fair
Value
Available-for-sale securities:
  Fixed maturity securities$14,321 $15,191 $17,615 $20,478 
Equity securities33 33 24 24 
Commercial mortgage and other loans:
  Transitional real estate loans (floating rate)5,133 5,088 4,226 4,293 
  Commercial mortgage and other loans1,269 1,129 1,217 1,265 
  Middle market loans (floating rate)4,557 4,545 4,297 4,352 
Other investments1,899 1,899 1,534 1,534 
      Total U.S. Dollar Program27,212 27,885 28,913 31,946 
Available-for-sale securities:
  Fixed maturity securities - economically converted to yen2,209 2,795 2,236 3,328 
      Total U.S. dollar-denominated investments in Aflac Japan$29,421 $30,680 $31,149 $35,274 
 2019 2018
(In millions)
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
 
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
Available-for-sale securities:     
  Fixed maturity securities (excluding bank loans)$18,012
$19,542
 $17,101
$17,003
  Fixed maturity securities - bank loans (floating rate)677
649
 1,296
1,238
Equity securities19
19
 177
177
Commercial mortgage and other loans:     
  Transitional real estate loans (floating rate)4,507
4,543
 3,621
3,625
  Commercial mortgage loans1,308
1,319
 763
736
  Middle market loans (floating rate)2,141
2,153
 1,144
1,146
Other investments496
496
 333
333
      Total U.S. Dollar Program27,160
28,721
 24,435
24,258
Available-for-sale securities:     
  Fixed maturity securities - economically converted to yen1,700
2,608
 1,679
2,269
      Total U.S. dollar-denominated investments in Aflac Japan$28,860
$31,329
 $26,114
$26,527
(1) Net of allowance for credit losses

The U.S. Dollar Program includes all U.S. dollar-denominated investments in Aflac Japan other than the investments in certain consolidated VIEs where the instrument is economically converted to yen as a result of a derivative in the consolidated variable interest entity.VIE. The Company uses one-sided foreign currency put options to mitigate the settlement risk on U.S. dollar-denominated assets related to extreme foreign currency rate changes. From time to time, Aflac Japan also maintains a collar program on a portion of its U.S. Dollar Program to mitigate against more extreme moves in foreign exchange and therefore support SMR. As of December 31, 2019,2022, there were no collars in Aflac Japan, had $8.8 billion outstanding notional amountsand none of the Company's foreign currency options hedging Aflac Japan's U.S. dollar-denominated assets were in-the-money.

In 2021, the Company moved to a strategy that contains one-sided put options, fewer foreign currency forwards and $21.1 billion outstanding notional amountsno collars in order to reduce its exposure to pricing volatility and the related risk of foreign currencynegative settlements should there be a material weakening in the yen. Depending on further developments, including the possibility of further market volatility, there may be additional costs associated with maintaining the options program. The Company is continually evaluating other adjustments, including the possibility of which none were in-the-money,changing the level of hedging employed with the U.S. dollar-denominated investments. The

As of December 31, 2022, the fair value of Aflac Japan's unhedged U.S. dollar-denominated portfolio was $19.9$10.3 billion (excluding certain U.S. dollar-denominated assets shown in the table above as a result of consolidation that have been economically converted to yen using derivatives).

Foreign exchange derivatives used for hedging are periodically settled, which results in cash receipt or payment at maturity or early termination. The Company had net cash outflows of $20 million in 2019, net cash inflows of $272 million in

55


Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

2018 and net cash outflows of $747 million in 2017,following table presents the settlements associated with the Company's currency derivatives used for hedging Aflac Japan’s U.S. dollar-denominated investments.investments for the years ended December 31.
(In millions)20222021
Net cash inflows (outflows)$(757)$66 

Enterprise Corporate Hedging Program

The Company has designated certain yen-denominated liabilities and foreign currency forwards and options of the Parent Company as accounting hedges of its net investment in Aflac Japan. The Company's consolidated yen-denominated net asset position was partially hedged at $9.1$11.6 billion as of December 31, 2019,2022, with hedging instruments comprised of $4.0 billion of yen-denominated debt and $7.6 billion of foreign currency forwards and options, compared with $1.8$10.2 billion as of December 31, 2018.2021, with hedging instruments comprised of $3.3 billion of yen-denominated debt and $6.9 billion of foreign currency forwards and options.



55

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The Company makes its accounting designation of net investment hedge at the beginning of each quarter. If the total of the designated Parent Company non-derivative and derivative notional is equal to or less than the Company's net investment in Aflac Japan, the hedge is deemed to be effective, and the currency exchange effect on the yen-denominated liabilities and the change in estimated fair value of the derivatives are reported in the unrealized foreign currency component of other comprehensive income. The Company's net investment hedge was effective during the years ended December 31, 20192022 and 2018,2021, respectively. For additional information on the Company's net investment hedging strategy, see Note 4 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

In order to economically mitigate risks associated with the enterprise-wide exposure to the yen and the level and volatility of hedge costs, the Parent Company enters into foreign exchange forward and option contracts. By buying U.S. dollars and selling yen, the Parent Company is effectively lowering its overall economic exposure to the yen, while Aflac Japan's U.SU.S. dollar exposure remains reduced as a result of Aflac Japan's U.S. dollar-denominated hedge programDollar Program that economically creates yen assets. Among other objectives, this strategy is intended to offset the enterprise-wide amortized hedge costs by generating amortized hedge income. The portion of the enterprise-wide amortized hedge income contributed by this strategy was $89 million in 2019 and $36 million in 2018. This activity is reported in Corporate and Other. As this program evolves, theother. The Company will continue to evaluatecontinually evaluates the program’s efficacy. See the Results of Operations section of this MD&A for the Company's definition of amortized hedge costs/income.

The following table presents metrics related to Aflac Japan amortized hedge costs and the Parent Company amortized hedge income for the years ended December 31.

Aflac Japan Hedge Cost Metrics
(1)
 2019 2018
Aflac Japan:   
   FX forward (sell USD, buy yen) notional at end of period (in billions)(2)
$8.8 $9.9
   Weighted average remaining tenor (in months)(3)
8.5 21.4
   Amortized hedge income (cost) for period (in millions)$(257) $(236)
Parent Company:   
   FX forward (buy USD, sell yen) notional at end of period (in billions)(2)
$4.9 $2.5
   Weighted average remaining tenor (in months)(3)
13.7 16.1
   Amortized hedge income (cost) for period (in millions)$89 $36
(1) See the Results of Operations section of this MD&A for the Company's definition of amortized hedge costs/income.
(2) Notional is reported net of any offsetting positions within Aflac Japan or the Parent Company, respectively.
(3) Tenor based on period reporting date to settlement date

Interest Rate Risk Hedge Program

Aflac Japan and Aflac U.S. use interest rate swaps from time to time to mitigate the risk of investment income volatility for certain variable-rate investments. In 2022, the Company expanded the use of interest rate swaps for this hedging strategy. Additionally, to manage interest rate risk associated with its U.S. dollar-denominated investments held by Aflac Japan, from time to time the Company utilizes interest rate swaptions.

For additional discussion of the risks associated with the foreign currency exposure refer to the Currency Risk section in Item 7A., Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk, and Item 1A, specifically to the Risk Factors titled “The Company is exposed to foreign currency fluctuations in the yen/dollar exchange rate“ and “Lack of availability of acceptable yen-denominated investments could adversely affect the Company's results of operations, financial position or liquidity."


56


Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

See Note 4 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the Company's hedging activities.

POLICY LIABILITIES

The following table presents policy liabilities by segment and in total for the years ended December 31.
(In millions)2019 2018 (In millions)20222021
Japan segment:    Japan segment:
Future policy benefits$81,462
 $77,812
 Future policy benefits$71,150 $81,176 
Unpaid policy claims2,879
 2,857
 Unpaid policy claims2,610 2,903 
Other policy liabilities11,452
 12,122
 Other policy liabilities7,835 9,534 
Total Japan policy liabilities95,793
 92,791
 Total Japan policy liabilities81,594 93,613 
U.S. segment:    U.S. segment:
Future policy benefits9,405
 9,137
 Future policy benefits9,960 9,865 
Unpaid policy claims1,779
 1,727
 Unpaid policy claims1,952 1,933 
Other policy liabilities111
 117
 Other policy liabilities117 119 
Total U.S. policy liabilities11,295
 10,981
 Total U.S. policy liabilities12,029 11,916 
Consolidated:    Consolidated:
Future policy benefits90,335
 86,368
 Future policy benefits80,749 90,588 
Unpaid policy claims4,659
 4,584
 Unpaid policy claims4,561 4,836 
Other policy liabilities11,560
 12,236
 Other policy liabilities7,948 9,648 
Total consolidated policy liabilities (1)
$106,554
 $103,188
 
Total consolidated policy liabilities (1)
$93,258 $105,072 
(1) The sum of the Japan and U.S. segments exceeds the total due to reinsurance and retrocession activity.

See Note 7 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the Company's policy liabilities.


56

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

BENEFIT PLANS

Aflac Japan and Aflac U.S. have various benefit plans. For additional information on the Company's Japanese and U.S. plans, see Note 14 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

POLICYHOLDER PROTECTION
Policyholder Protection Corporation

The Japanese insurance industry has a policyholder protection system that provides funds for the policyholders of insolvent insurers. Legislation enacted regarding the framework of the Life Insurance Policyholder Protection Corporation (LIPPC) included government fiscal measures supporting the LIPPC. In November 2016,March 2022, Japan's Diet passed legislation that again extendsextended the government's fiscal support of the LIPPC through March 2022. Effective April 2014,2027. In March 2022, the annual LIPPC contribution amountreached the required balance for the total life industry was lowered from ¥40of ¥400 billion as specified by its Articles of Incorporation. As a result, additional contributions are not expected to ¥33 billion.be required unless the balance is reduced due to payments made by the LIPPC to the policyholders of insolvent insurers. Aflac Japan recognized an expense of ¥1.9¥.9 billion and ¥2.0¥1.8 billion for LIPPC assessments in the years ended December 31, 20192022 and 2018, respectively, for LIPPC assessments.2021, respectively.

Guaranty Fund Assessments

Under U.S. state guaranty association laws, certain insurance companies can be assessed (up to prescribed limits) for certain obligations to the policyholders and claimants of impaired or insolvent insurance companies that write the same line or similar lines of business. The amount of the guaranty fund assessment that an insurer is assessed is based on its proportionate share of premiums in that state. See Note 15 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on the assessment.guaranty fund assessments.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

As of December 31, 2019, the Company had no material letters of credit, standby letters of credit, guarantees or standby repurchase obligations. See Note 15 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for information on material unconditional purchase obligations that are not recorded on the Company's balance sheet.

57


Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations


LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Liquidity refers to the ability to generate sufficient cash resources to meet the payment obligations of the Company. Capital refers to the long-term financial resources available to support the operations of the businesses, fund business growth and provide for an ability to withstand adverse circumstances. Financial leverage (leverage) refers to an investment strategy of using debt to increase the potential return on equity.ROE. The Company targets and actively manages liquidity, capital and leverage in the context of a number of considerations, including:

business investment and growth needs
strategic growth objectives
financial flexibility and obligations
capital support for hedging activity
a constantly evolving business and economic environment
a balanced approach to capital allocation and shareholder deployment.

The governance framework supporting liquidity, capital and leverage includes global senior management and board committees that review and approve all significant capital related decisions.

The Company's cash and cash equivalents include unrestricted cash on hand, money market instruments, and other debt instruments with a maturity of 90 days or less when purchased, all of which has minimal market, settlement or other risk exposure. The target minimum amount for the Parent Company’s cash and cash equivalents is approximately $2.0$1.8 billion to provide availablea capital buffer and liquidity support at the holding company. This amount excludes $400 million of proceeds from the issuance of senior sustainability notes in 2021, unallocated proceeds of which contribute to total cash but are not intended to support holding company liquidity. The Company remains committed to prudent liquidity and capital management. At December 31, 2022, the Company held $3.9 billion in cash and cash equivalents for stress conditions, which includes the Parent Company's target minimum amount of $1.8 billion.

Aflac Japan and Aflac U.S. generate cash flows from their operations and provide the primary sources of liquidity to the Parent Company through management fees and dividends, with Aflac Japan being the paymentlargest contributor. The primary uses of cash by the Parent Company are shareholder dividends, the repurchase of its common stock, interest on its outstanding indebtedness and management fees. operating expenses.



57

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following table presents the amounts provided to the Parent Company for the years ended December 31.

Liquidity Provided by Subsidiaries to Parent Company
(In millions)2019 2018 (In millions)20222021
Management fees paid by subsidiariesManagement fees paid by subsidiaries$136 $130 
Dividends declared or paid by subsidiaries$3,466

$1,817
 Dividends declared or paid by subsidiaries3,006 2,791 
Management fees paid by subsidiaries151
 204
 
The decline in dividends during 2018 was driven by a change in the dividend regulatory approval process subsequent to the conversion of Aflac Japan from a branch to a subsidiary on April 1, 2018. The Company resumed dividend payments from Aflac Japan in the fourth quarter of 2018. Management fees decreased during 2019 and 2018, compared to prior years, due to changes in the administration of intercompany expenses between legal entities subsequent to the conversion, as well.

Prior to the Aflac Japan branch conversion, Aflac Japan paid allocated expenses and profit remittances to Aflac U.S. The following table details Aflac Japan remittances, which are included in the totals above, for the years ended December 31.

Aflac Japan Remittances
(In millions of dollars and billions of yen)20222021
Aflac Japan management fees paid to Parent Company$61 $59 
Aflac Japan dividends declared or paid to Parent Company (in dollars)2,412 2,138 
Aflac Japan dividends declared or paid to Parent Company (in yen)¥324.2 ¥236.7 
(In millions of dollars and billions of yen)2019 2018 
Aflac Japan management fees paid to Parent Company$75
 $136
 
Expenses allocated to Aflac Japan (in dollars)4
 24
 
Aflac Japan profit remittances to the Parent Company or Aflac U.S. (in dollars)2,070
 808
 
Aflac Japan profit remittances to the Parent Company or Aflac U.S. (in yen)¥225.2
 ¥89.7
 


In 2018, the Company announced a change in its internal dividend policy which allows the Company to increase the proportion of regulatory earnings transferred from Aflac U.S. and Aflac Japan to the Parent Company. The Company intends to maintain higher than historical levels of capitalliquidity and liquiditycapital at the Parent Company for stress conditions and with the goals of addressing the Company’s hedge costs and related potential need for collateral and mitigating against long-term weakening of the Japanese yen. Further, the Company plans to continue to maintain a portfolio of unhedged U.S. dollar baseddollar-denominated investments at Aflac Japan and to consider whether the amount of such investments should be increased or decreased relative to the Company’s view of economic equity surplus in Aflac Japan in light of potentially rising hedge costs and other factors. See the "Hedging Activity"Hedging Activity subsection inof this MD&A for more information.


The Company believes that its balance of cash and cash equivalents and cash generated by operations will be sufficient to satisfy both its short-term and long-term cash requirements and plans for cash, including material cash requirements from known contractual obligations and returning capital to shareholders through share repurchases and dividends.
58


Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

In addition to cash and cash equivalents, the Company also maintains credit facilities, both intercompany and with external partners, and a number of other available tools to support liquidity needs on a global basis. In September 2018,2021, the Parent Company filed a shelf registration statement with the SEC that allows the Company to issue an indefinite amount of debt securities, in one or more series, from time to time until September 2021. In August 2018, the Parent Company filed a shelf registration with Japanese regulatory authorities that allows the Parent Company to conduct public offerings of bonds in Japan, including yen-denominated Samurai notes, up to ¥200 billion or its equivalent through August 2020. The shelf registration statement is for possible public offerings in Japan, but the bonds issued under the shelf may be transferred by the bondholders to U.S. persons in compliance with U.S. law.2024. The Company believes outside sources for additional debt and equity capital, if needed, will continue to be available. Additionally, as of December 31, 2019,2022, the Parent Company and Aflac had four lines of credit with third parties and threeten intercompany lines of credit. The Company was in compliance with all of the covenants of its notes payable and lines of credit at December 31, 2022. For additional information, see Note 9 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

The primary uses


58

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of cash by the Parent Company are shareholder dividends, the repurchase of its common stockFinancial Condition and interest on its outstanding indebtedness and operating expenses.Results of Operations

Major Contractual Obligations

The following table presents the estimated payments by period of the Company's majormaterial cash requirements from known contractual obligations as of December 31, 2019.2022. The Company translated its yen-denominated obligations using the December 31, 2019,2022, exchange rate. Actual future payments as reported in dollars will fluctuate with changes in the yen/dollar exchange rate.
Distribution of Payments by Period
(In millions)
Total
Liability
(1)
 Total
Payments
 Less
Than
One Year
 
One to
Three Years
 Four to
Five Years
 After
Five Years
Future policy benefits liability (Note 7)(2)
$90,335
  $244,884
 $9,221
 $18,151
 $18,224
 $199,288
Unpaid policy claims liability (Note 7)(3)
4,659
  4,660
 2,985
 980
 394
 301
Other policyholders' funds (Note 7)(3)
7,317
 9,902
 341
 389
 706
 8,466
Long-term debt – principal (Note 9)
6,408
  6,458
 0
 350
 1,450
 4,658
Long-term debt – interest (Note 9)
44
  2,036
 171
 320
 262
 1,283
Cash collateral on loaned securities (Note 3)
1,876
 1,876
 1,876
 0
 0
 0
Operating service agreements (Note 15)
N/A
(4) 
463
 179
 279
 5
 0
Operating lease obligations (Note 9)
149
 159
 49
 68
 20
 22
Finance lease obligations (Note 9)
12
  12
 4
 5
 3
 0
Total contractual obligations$110,800
  $270,450
 $14,826
 $20,542
 $21,064
 $214,018
Liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits in the amount of $17 have been excluded from the tabular disclosure above because the timing of cash payment is not reasonably estimable.
(In millions)
Total
Liability
(1)
 Total
Payments
Short-term PaymentsLong-term Payments
Future policy benefits liability (Note 7)(2)
$80,749   $193,394 $7,763 $185,631 
Unpaid policy claims liability (Note 7)(3)
4,561   4,555 2,862 1,693 
Other policyholders' funds (Note 7)(4)
6,123 7,533 352 7,181 
Long-term debt – principal (Note 9)
7,295   7,103 7,103 
Long-term debt – interest (Note 9)
44   2,705 165 2,540 
Cash collateral on loaned securities (Note 3)
1,809 1,809 1,809 
Operating service agreements (Note 15)
N/A386 175 211 
Operating lease obligations (Note 9)
139 144 44 100 
Finance lease obligations (Note 9)
  
Total contractual obligations$100,728   $217,637 $13,173 $204,464 
(1)Liability amounts are those reported on the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2019.2022.
(2)The estimated payments due by period reflect future estimated cash payments to be made to policyholders and others for future policy benefits. These projected cash outflows are based on assumptions for future policy persistency, mortality, morbidity, and other assumptions comparable with the Company's experience, consider future premium receipts on current policies in force and assume market growth and interest crediting consistent with assumptions used in amortizing deferred acquisition costs. These cash outflows are undiscounted with respect to interest and, as a result, the sum of the cash outflows shown for all years in the table of $244,884 exceeds the corresponding liability amount of $90,335. The Company has made significant assumptions to determine the future estimated cash outflows related to the underlying policies and contracts.amount. Due to the significance of the assumptions used, actual cash outflow amounts and timing will differ, possibly materially, from these estimates.
(3)IncludesThe estimated payments include assumptions as to the timing of policyholders reporting claims for prior periods and the amount of those claims. Actual amounts and timing of unpaid policy claims payments may differ significantly from the estimates above.
(4)Not applicableThese cash outflows are undiscounted with respect to interest and, as a result, the sum of the cash outflows exceeds the corresponding liability amount.

For more information on the Company's major contractual obligations, see the applicable Note in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as indicated in the line items in the table above.

The Company's consolidated financial statements convey its financing arrangements during the periods presented. The Company has not engaged in material intra-period short-term financings during the periods presented that are not otherwise reported in its balance sheet or disclosed therein. TheAs of December 31, 2022, the Company was in compliance with all of the covenants of its notes payable and lineshad no material letters of credit, at December 31, 2019.standby letters of credit, guarantees or standby repurchase obligations. The Company has not entered into transactions involving the transfer of financial assets with an obligation to repurchase financial assets that have been accounted for as a sale under applicable accounting standards,

59



including securities lending transactions. See Notes 1, 3, and 4 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information on the Company's securities lending and derivative activities. With the exception of disclosed activities in those referenced footnotes and the Risk Factors entitled, "The Company is exposed to foreign currency fluctuations in the yen/dollar exchange rate" and "Lack of availability of acceptable yen-denominated investments could adversely affect the Company's results of operations, financial position or liquidity," the Company is not aware of aany trend, demand, commitment, event or uncertainty that would likelyreasonably result in its liquidity increasing or decreasing by a material amount.
Consolidated Cash Flows

The Company consistently generates positive cash flows from operations, and has the ability to adjust cash flow management from other sources of liquidity including reinvestment cash flows and selling investments in order to meet short-term cash needs.

The Company translates cash flows for Aflac Japan's yen-denominated items into U.S. dollars using weighted-average exchange rates. In years when the yen weakens, translating yen into dollars causes fewer dollars to be reported. When the yen strengthens, translating yen into dollars causes more dollars to be reported.



59

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following table summarizes consolidated cash flows by activity for the years ended December 31.
(In millions)20222021
Operating activities$3,879 $5,051 
Investing activities(1,540)(2,378)
Financing activities(3,551)(2,739)
Exchange effect on cash and cash equivalents104 (24)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents$(1,108)$(90)
(In millions)2019 2018 
Operating activities$5,455
 $6,014
 
Investing activities(3,171) (3,582) 
Financing activities(1,713) (1,616) 
Exchange effect on cash and cash equivalents(12) 30
 
Net change in cash and cash equivalents$559
 $846
 

Operating Activities

The principal cash inflows for the Company's insurance activities come from insurance premiums and investment income. The principal cash outflows are the result of policy claims, operating expenses, income tax, as well as interest expense. As a result of policyholder aging, claims payments are expected to gradually increase over the life of a policy. Therefore, future policy benefit reserves are accumulated in the early years of a policy and are designed to help fund future claims payments.

The Company expects its future cash flows from premiums and its investment portfolioportfolios to be sufficient to meet its cash needs for benefits and expenses. Consolidated cash flow from operations decreased 9.3%23.2% in 2019,2022, compared with 2018.
2021.

Investing Activities

The Company's investment objectives provide for liquidity primarily through the purchase of publicly traded investment-grade debt securities. Prudent portfolio management dictates that the Company attempts to match the duration of its assets with the duration of its liabilities. Currently, when the Company's fixed maturity securities mature, the proceeds may be reinvested at a yield below that required for the accretion of policy benefit liabilities on policies issued in earlier years. However, the long-term nature of the Company's business and its strong cash flows provide the Company with the ability to minimize the effect of mismatched durations and/or yields identified by various asset adequacy analyses. From time to time or when market opportunities arise, the Company disposes of selected fixed maturity securities that are available for sale to improve the duration matching of assets and liabilities, improve future investment yields, and/or re-balance its portfolio. As a result, dispositions before maturity can vary significantly from year to year.

As part of its overall corporate strategy, the Company has announced an increase in its commitmentcommitted $400 million to the Aflac Ventures, Fund from $250 million to $400 million,LLC (Aflac Ventures), as opportunities emerge. These investments are included in equity securities or the other investments line in the consolidated balance sheets. The Aflac Ventures Fund is a subsidiary of Aflac CorporateGlobal Ventures, LLC (Aflac Global Ventures) which is reported in the Corporate and other segment.other. The central mission of Aflac CorporateGlobal Ventures is to support the organic growth and business development needs of Aflac Japan and Aflac U.S. with an emphasis on digital applications designed to improve the customer experience, gain efficiencies, and develop new markets in an effort to enhance and defend long-term shareholder value. Investments are included in equity securities or the other investments line in the consolidated balance sheets.

As part of an arrangement with Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta (FHLB), Aflac U.S. obtains low-cost funding from FHLB supported by acceptable forms of collateral pledged by Aflac U.S. In 2022, Aflac U.S. borrowed and repaid $217$599 million under this program during 2019.program. As of December 31, 2019,2022, Aflac U.S. had outstanding borrowings of $403$609 million reported in its balance sheet.


60



See Note 3 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for details on certain investment commitments.

Financing Activities

Consolidated cash used byCash flows from financing activities was $1.7 billion in 2019consist primarily of share repurchases, dividends to shareholders and $1.6 billion in 2018.from time to time debt issuances and redemptions.

In December 2019,October 2022, the Parent Company used a portion of the net proceeds from its September 2022 issuance of various series of senior notes to redeem $450 million of its 3.25% senior notes due March 2025.

In September 2022, the Parent Company issued four series of senior notes totaling ¥38.0¥73.0 billion through a public debt offering under its U.S. shelf registration statement. The first series, which totaled ¥12.6¥33.4 billion, bears interest at a fixed rate of .500%1.075% per annum, payable semi-annually, and will mature in September 2029. The second series, which totaled


60

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
¥21.1 billion, bears interest at a fixed rate of 1.320% per annum, payable semi-annually, and will mature in December 2029.2032. The secondthird series, which totaled ¥9.3¥6.5 billion, bears interest at a fixed rate of .843%1.594% per annum, payable semi-annually, and will mature in December 2031.September 2037. The thirdfourth series, which totaled ¥9.8¥12.0 billion, bears interest at a fixed rate of .934%2.144% per annum, payable semi-annually, and will mature in December 2034. The fourth series, which totaled ¥6.3 billion, bears interest at a fixed rate of 1.122% per annum, payable semi-annually, and will mature in December 2039.September 2052. These notes may only be redeemed before maturity,are redeemable at the Parent Company’s option at any time, in whole but not in part, upon the occurrence of certain changes affecting U.S. taxation, as specified in the indenture governing the terms of the issuance. In addition, the notes maturing in September 2029, December 2032 and September 2037 are redeemable at the Parent Company's option, in whole or in part from time to time, on or after June 14, 2029, June 14, 2032 and March 14, 2037, respectively, at a redemption price equal to the aggregate principal amount of the applicable series to be redeemed plus accrued and unpaid interest on the principal amount to be redeemed to, but excluding, the date of redemption.

In September 2019,2022, the Parent Company used a portion of the net proceeds from its September 2022 issuance of various series of senior notes and the August 2022 senior term loan facility to redeem $750 million of its 3.625% senior notes due November 2024.

In August 2022, the Parent Company renewed a ¥30.0 billion senior term loan facility.facility with a commitment amount totaling ¥107.0 billion. The first tranche of the facility, which totaled ¥5.0¥11.7 billion, bears interest at a rate per annum equal to the Tokyo interbank market rate (TIBOR), or alternate TIBOR, if applicable, plus the applicable TIBOR margin and will mature in September 2026.August 2027. The applicable margin ranges between .30%.225% and .70%.625%, depending on the Parent Company's debt ratings as of the date of determination. The second tranche, which totaled ¥25.0¥25.3 billion, bears interest at a rate per annum equal to the TIBOR, or alternate TIBOR, if applicable, plus the applicable TIBOR margin and will mature in SeptemberAugust 2029. The applicable margin ranges between .45%.325% and 1.00%.725%, depending on the Parent Company's debt ratings as of the date of determination. The third tranche, which totaled ¥70.0 billion, bears interest at a rate per annum equal to TIBOR, or alternate TIBOR, if applicable, plus the applicable TIBOR margin and will mature in August 2032. The applicable margin ranges between .475% and 1.025%, depending on the Parent Company's debt ratings as of the date of determination.

In May 2021, the Parent Company used a portion of the net proceeds from the April 2021 issuance of its various series of senior notes to redeem $700 million of its 3.625% senior notes due June 2023.

In April 2019, ALIJ2021, the Parent Company issued five series of senior notes totaling ¥82.0 billion through a public debt offering under its then existing U.S. shelf registration statement. The first series, which totaled ¥30.0 billion, (par value) of perpetual subordinated bonds. These bonds bearbears interest at a fixed rate of .963%.633% per annum, payable semi-annually, and thenwill mature in April 2031. The second series, which totaled ¥12.0 billion, bears interest at six-month Euro Yen LIBOR plus an applicable spreada fixed rate of .844% per annum, payable semi-annually, and will mature in April 2033. The third series, which totaled ¥10.0 billion, bears interest at a fixed rate of 1.039% per annum, payable semi-annually, and will mature in April 2036. The fourth series, which totaled ¥10.0 billion, bears interest at a fixed rate of 1.264% per annum, payable semi-annually, and will mature in April 2041. The fifth series, which totaled ¥20.0 billion, bears interest at a fixed rate of 1.560% per annum, payable semi-annually, and will mature in April 2051. The notes are redeemable at the Parent Company’s option (i) at any time, in whole but not in part, upon the occurrence of certain changes affecting U.S. taxation, as specified in the indenture governing the terms of the issuance or (ii) on andor after the day immediately following April 18, 2024. The bonds will be callable on each interest payment date on and after April 18, 2024. In November 2019, ALIJ amendedthat is six months prior to the bonds to change their duration from perpetual to a stated maturity date of April 16, 2049the series, in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to the aggregate principal amount to be redeemed plus accrued and unpaid interest on the principal amount to remove provisions that permitted ALIJbe redeemed to, defer paymentsbut excluding, the date of interest under certain circumstances.

redemption.

In October 2018,March 2021, the Parent Company issued $550$400 million of senior sustainability notes through a U.S. public debt offering. The notes bear interest at a fixed rate of 4.750%1.125% per annum, payable semi-annually, and will mature in January 2049. March 2026. The Company intends, but is not contractually committed, to allocate an amount at least equivalent to the net proceeds from this issuance exclusively to existing or future investments in, or financing of, assets, businesses or projects that meet the eligibility criteria of the Company's sustainability bond framework described in the offering documentation in connection with such notes. These notes are redeemable at the Parent Company's option in whole at any time or in part from time to time at a redemption price equal to the greater of: (i) the aggregate principal amount of the notes to be redeemed or (ii) the amount equal to the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments for principal of and interest on the notes to be redeemed, not including any portion of the payments of interest accrued as of such redemption date, discounted to such redemption date on a semiannual basis at the yield to maturity for a U.S.TreasuryU.S. Treasury security with a maturity comparable to the remaining term of the notes, plus 2510 basis points, plus in each case, accrued and unpaid interest on the principal amount of the notes to be redeemed to, but excluding, such redemption date.

In October 2018, the Parent Company issued three series of senior notes totaling ¥53.4 billion through a public debt offering under its U.S. shelf registration statement. The first series, which totaled ¥29.3 billion, bears interest at a fixed rate of 1.159% per annum, payable semi-annually, and will mature in October 2030. The second series, which totaled ¥15.2 billion, bears interest at a fixed rate of 1.488% per annum, payable semi-annually, and will mature in October 2033. The third series, which totaled ¥8.9 billion, bears interest at a fixed rate of 1.750% per annum, payable semi-annually, and will mature in October 2038. These notes may only be redeemed before maturity, in whole but not in part, upon the occurrence of certain changes affecting U.S. taxation, as specified in the indenture governing the terms of the issuance.

In November 2018, the Parent Company used the net proceeds from the October 2018 issuance of its senior notes to redeem $550 million of the Parent Company's 2.40% senior notes due in 2020.

See Note 9 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on the debt issuances discussed above.

The Company was in compliance with all


61

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of the covenants of its notes payableFinancial Condition and lines Results of credit at December 31, 2019. Operations

Cash returned to shareholders through treasury stock purchases and dividends was $2.4$3.4 billion in 2019,2022, compared with $2.1$3.2 billion in 2018.2021.

The following tables present a summary of treasury stock activity during the years ended December 31.

61




Treasury Stock Purchased
(In millions of dollars and thousands of shares)20222021
Treasury stock purchases$2,401 $2,301 
Number of shares purchased:
Share repurchase program39,187 43,327 
Other370 437 
   Total shares purchased39,557 43,764 
(In millions of dollars and thousands of shares)2019 2018 
Treasury stock purchases$1,627
 $1,301
 
Number of shares purchased:    
Share repurchase program31,994
 28,949
 
Other592
 392
 
   Total shares purchased32,586
 29,341
 

Treasury Stock Issued
(In millions of dollars and thousands of shares)20222021
Stock issued from treasury:
   Cash financing$17 $26 
   Noncash financing57 55 
   Total stock issued from treasury$74 $81 
Number of shares issued1,341 1,721 
(In millions of dollars and thousands of shares)2019 2018 
Stock issued from treasury:    
   Cash financing$49
 $58
 
   Noncash financing50
 17
 
   Total stock issued from treasury$99
 $75
 
Number of shares issued2,324
 1,939
 


Under share repurchase authorizations fromIn November 2022, the Company's board of directors authorized the Company purchased 32.0purchase of an additional 100 million shares of its common stock in 2019, compared with 28.9 million shares in 2018.stock. As of December 31, 2019,2022, a remaining balance of 37.1116.6 million shares of the Company's common stock was available for purchase under share repurchase authorizations by its board of directors. The Company currently plans to repurchase $1.3 billion to $1.7 billion of its common stock in 2020, assuming stable capital conditions and absent compelling alternatives. See Note 11 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

In August 2022, the IRA was signed into U.S. law. Effective January 1, 2023, the law imposes a 1% excise tax on the Company's repurchase of its common stock.

Cash dividends paid to shareholders in 20192022 of $1.08$1.60 per share increased 3.8%21.2% over 2018.2021. The following table presents the dividend activity for the years ended December 31.

Dividends Paid to Shareholders
(In millions)20222021
Dividends paid in cash$979 $855 
Dividends through issuance of treasury shares37 32 
Total dividends to shareholders$1,016 $887 
(In millions)2019 2018 
Dividends paid in cash$771
 $793
 
Dividends through issuance of treasury shares30
 8
 
Total dividends to shareholders$801
 $801
 

In January 2020,November 2022, the board of directors announced a 3.7%5.0% increase in the quarterly cash dividend, effective with the first quarter of 2020.2023. The first quarter 20202023 cash dividend of $.28$.42 per share is payable on March 2, 2020,1, 2023, to shareholders of record at the close of business on February 19, 2020.15, 2023.

Regulatory Restrictions

Aflac CAIC and TOIC are domiciled in Nebraska and are subject to its regulations. Subsequent to the Japan branch conversion to a subsidiary, Aflac Japan is domiciled in Japan and subject to local regulations. The Nebraska Department of Insurance imposes certain limitations and restrictions on payments of dividends, management fees, loans and advances to the Parent Company. Under Nebraska insurance law, prior approval of the Nebraska Department of Insurance is required for dividend distributions that exceed the greater of the net income from operations, which excludes net realized investment gains, for the previous year determined under statutory accounting principles, or 10% of statutory capital and surplus as of the previous year-end. In addition, the Nebraska insurance department must approve service arrangements and other transactions within the affiliated group of companies. These regulatory limitations are not expected to affect the level of management fees or dividends paid to the Parent Company. (See below for discussion of restrictions imposed by Japanese insurance regulators.) A life insurance company’s statutory capital and surplus is determined according to rules prescribed by the NAIC, as modified by the insurance department in the insurance company’s state of domicile. Statutory accounting rules are different from U.S. GAAP and are intended to emphasize policyholder protection and company solvency. Similar laws apply in New York, the domiciliary jurisdiction of Aflac New York.


62



The continued long-term growth of the Company's business may require increases in the statutory capital and surplus of its insurance operations. Aflac’s insurance operations may secure additional statutory capital through various sources, such as internally generated statutory earnings, capital contributions by the Parent Company from funds generated through debt or equity offerings, or reinsurance transactions. The NAIC’s RBC formula is used by insurance regulators to help identify inadequately capitalized insurance companies. The RBC formula quantifies insurance risk, business risk, asset risk and interest rate risk by weighing the types and mixtures of risks inherent in the insurer’s operations.

Aflac's company action level RBC ratio was 539% as of December 31, 2019, compared with 560% at December 31, 2018. Aflac’s RBC ratio remains high and reflects a strong capital and surplus position. As of December 31, 2019, Aflac's total adjusted capital of $2.2 billion exceeded the company action level required capital and surplus of $.4 billion by $1.8 billion. With the announcement of the Japan branch conversion to a subsidiary, we had announced our intention to remove excess capital out of Aflac, targeting a 500% RBC by the end of 2019. As of December 31, 2019, the Company has completed the RBC drawdown plan and has moved $1.75 billion of capital from Aflac to the Parent Company, supporting the Company's capital deployment and risk management activities.

The maximum amount of dividends that can be paid to the Parent Company by Aflac, CAIC and TOIC without prior approval of Nebraska's director of insurance is the greater of the net income from operations, which excludes net realized investment gains, for the previous year determined under statutory accounting principles, or 10% of statutory capital and surplus as of the previous year-end. Dividends declared by Aflac during 2020 in excess of $864 million would be considered extraordinary and require such approval. Following the Japan branch conversion to a subsidiary, the Company used extraordinary dividends as needed to actively manage to appropriate RBC levels that are lower yet sufficient to maintain ratings and support prudent capital management. Similar laws apply in New York, the domiciliary jurisdiction of Aflac New York. See Note 13 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding the impact of permitted practices by the Nebraska Department of Insurance on the Company's statutory capital and surplus.

The NAIC considers its Solvency Modernization Initiative (SMI) process relating to updating the U.S. insurance solvency regulation framework to be ongoing. The SMI has focused on key issues such as capital requirements, governance and risk management, group supervision, reinsurance, statutory accounting and financial reporting matters. Many of these key issues have been finalized and/or are near completion; however, the NAIC still has some ongoing initiatives related to SMI, such as monitoring the international efforts on group capital requirements as well as RBC.
In addition, the NAIC is also considering changes to investment risk factors. Any negative developments by the NAIC in these areas could result in increased capital requirements for the Company.

Aflac is subject to the NAIC’s Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA). Through the ORSA requirements, Aflac is expected to regularly, no less than annually, conduct an ORSA to assess the adequacy of its risk management framework, and its current and estimated projected future solvency position; internally document the process and results of the assessment; and provide a confidential high-level ORSA Summary Report annually to the lead state commissioner if the insurer is a member of an insurance group. In November 2019, Aflac filed its ORSA report with the Nebraska Department of Insurance.

In addition to limitations and restrictions imposed by U.S. insurance regulators, after the Japan branch conversion on April 1, 2018, the new Japan subsidiary is required to meet certain financial criteria as governed by Japanese corporate law in order to provide dividends to the Parent Company. Under these criteria, dividend capacity at the Japan subsidiary is basically defined as total equity excluding common stock, accumulated other comprehensive income amounts, capital reserves (representing statutorily required amounts in Japan) but reduced for net after-tax unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities. These dividend capacity requirements are generally aligned with the SMR. Japan's FSA maintains its own solvency standard which is quantified through the SMR. Aflac Japan's SMR is sensitive to interest rate, credit spread, and foreign exchange rate changes, therefore the Company continuesconsiders different ways to evaluate alternatives for reducing this sensitivity.offset significant declines in SMR, including


62

the reduction of subsidiary dividends paid to the Parent Company and Parent Company capital contributions. In the event of a rapid change in market risk conditions causing SMR to decline, the Company has one senior unsecured revolving credit facility in the amount of ¥100 billion and a committed reinsurance facility in the amount of approximately ¥110¥120 billion as a capital contingency plan. Additionally, the Company could take action to enter into derivatives on unhedged U.S. dollar-denominated investments with foreign currency options or forwards. See Notes 8 and 9 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

The Company has already undertaken various measures to mitigate the sensitivity of Aflac Japan's SMR. For example, the Company employs policy reserve matching (PRM) investment strategies, which is a Japan-specific accounting treatment that reduces SMR interest rate sensitivity since PRM-designated investments are carried at amortized cost consistent with corresponding liabilities. In order for a PRM-designated asset to be held at amortized cost, there are certain criteria that must be maintained. The primary criteriacriterion relates to maintaining the duration of designated assets and liabilities within a specified tolerance range. If the duration difference is not maintained within the specified range without rebalancing, then a certain

63



portion of the assets must be re-classified as available for sale and held at fair value with any associated unrealized gain or loss recorded in surplus. To rebalance, assets may need to be sold in order to maintain the duration with the specified range, resulting in realizing a gain or loss from the sale. For U.S. GAAP, PRM investments are categorized as available for sale. The Company also uses foreign currency derivatives to hedge a portion of its U.S. dollar-denominated investments. (See Notes 3, 4 and 8 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the Company's investment strategies, hedging activities, and reinsurance, respectively.)

Aflac'sAflac Japan's SMR ratio remains high and reflects a strong capital and surplus position. As of December 31, 2019,2022, Aflac Japan's SMR was 1,043%878%, compared with 965%1,012% at December 31, 2018. As part of the conversion of Aflac Japan from a branch to a subsidiary on April 1, 2018, the Company experienced an accounting-driven decline in the SMR of approximately 130 points, compared with the SMR as of December 31, 2017.2021. The Company expectsis committed to be able to pay dividends out of certain accounts, thus restoring this accounting impact over an estimated three-year period.maintaining strong capital levels, consistent with maintaining current insurance financial strength and credit ratings.

The FSA has been conducting field testing with the insurance industry concerningis considering the introduction of an economic value-based solvency regime.regime based on the Insurance Capital Standards (ICS) for insurance companies in Japan. The FSA is currently conducting field testing will assistwith insurance companies in Japan for the purpose of investigating the impact of the introduction of regulations. The FSA published provisional specifications in determining if an economic value-basedJune 2022. Final specifications are expected to be decided in 2024, and a new capital regime to replace the current solvency regime is expected to be introduced in Japan will be appropriate2025.

Aflac U.S.

A life insurance company’s statutory capital and surplus is determined according to rules prescribed by the NAIC, as modified by the insurance department in the insurance company’s state of domicile. Statutory accounting rules are different from U.S. GAAP and are intended to emphasize policyholder protection and company solvency. The continued long-term growth of the Company's business may require increases in the statutory capital and surplus of its insurance operations. The Company's insurance operations may secure additional statutory capital through various sources, such as internally generated statutory earnings, reduced dividends paid to the Parent Company, capital contributions by the Parent Company from funds generated through debt or equity offerings, or reinsurance transactions. The NAIC’s RBC formula is used by insurance regulators to help identify inadequately capitalized insurance companies. The RBC formula quantifies insurance risk, business risk, asset risk and interest rate risk by weighing the types and mixtures of risks inherent in the insurer’s operations.

The combined RBC ratio for Aflac U.S. as of December 31, 2022 was 732%, compared with 659% as of December 31, 2021. The Company calculates its combined RBC ratio to include all U.S. regulated life insurance entities as if a single combined U.S. RBC entity net of intercompany items related to capital resources and risk. The Company intends to maintain a target combined RBC over time of approximately 400% for Aflac U.S., consistent with the Company's risk management practices.

The table below presents RBC ratios for the Company’s U.S. life insurance industry.subsidiaries as of December 31, the most recently statutory fiscal year-end for the subsidiaries for which RBC was filed.
20222021
Aflac692 %635 %
CAIC1,056 832 
TOIC4,321 5,829 
Aflac New York859 1,089 



63

The NAIC completed its Solvency Modernization Initiative (SMI) process relating to updating the U.S. insurance solvency regulation framework. The SMI focused on key issues such as capital requirements, governance and risk management, group supervision, reinsurance, statutory accounting and financial reporting matters. The NAIC still has some ongoing initiatives related to SMI, such as monitoring the international efforts on group capital requirements as well as RBC. The NAIC utilizes a group capital calculation (GCC) that conceptually uses an RBC aggregation methodology for all entities within the insurance company holding system. The GCC is intended to be a regulatory tool used by regulators as a means to standardize group capital requirements.In 2021, the NAIC concluded its analysis of bond factor changes and formally adopted the new factors as proposed by Moody’s Analytics. This initiative expanded the RBC bond factors from six designations to 20 designations to more closely align with rating scales used by rating agencies. The adopted changes did not have a significant impact on the combined RBC ratio for Aflac U.S.

Aflac, CAIC and TOIC are domiciled in Nebraska and are subject to its regulations. The NDOI imposes certain limitations and restrictions on payments of dividends, management fees, loans and advances to the Parent Company. Under Nebraska insurance law, prior approval of the NDOI is required for dividend distributions that exceed the greater of the net income from operations, which excludes net investment gains, for the previous year determined under statutory accounting principles, or 10% of statutory capital and surplus as of the previous year-end. Dividends declared by Aflac during 2023 in excess of $1.1 billion would be considered extraordinary and require such approval. Similar laws apply in New York, the domiciliary jurisdiction of Aflac New York.

Privacy and Cybersecurity Governance

The Company’s Board of Directors has adopted an information security policy directing management to establish and operate a global information security program with the goals of monitoring existing and emerging threats and ensuring that the Company’s information assets and data, and the data of its customers, are appropriately protected from loss or theft. The Board has delegated oversight of the Company’s information security program to the Audit and Risk Committee. The Company’s senior officers, including its Global Security and Chief Information Security Officer, are responsible for the operation of the global information security program and regularly communicatecommunicates quarterly with the Audit and Risk Committee on the program, including with respect to the state of the program, compliance with applicable regulations, current and evolving threats, and recommendations for changes in the information security program. The global information security program also includes a cybersecurity incident response plan that is designed to provide a management framework across Company functions for a coordinated assessment and response to potential security incidents. This framework establishes a protocol to report certain incidents to the Global Security and Chief Information Security Officer and other senior officers, with the goal of timely assessing such incidents, determining applicable disclosure requirements and communicating with the Audit and Risk Committee. The incident response plan directs the executive officers to report certain incidents immediately and directly to the Lead Non-Management Director.

Other

For information regarding commitments and contingent liabilities, see Note 15 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Additional Information

Investors should note that the Company announces material financial information in its SEC filings, press releases and public conference calls. In accordance with SEC guidance, the Company may also use the Investor Relations section of the Company's website (http://investors.aflac.com) to communicate with investors about the Company. It is possible that the financial and other information the Company posts there could be deemed to be material information. The information on the Company's website is not part of this document. Further, the Company's references to website URLs are intended to be inactive textual references only.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES

The Company prepares its financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP. These principles are established primarily by the FASB. In this MD&A, references to U.S. GAAP issued by the FASB are derived from the FASB Accounting Standards Codification™ (ASC). The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires the Company to make estimates based on currently available information when recording transactions resulting from business operations. The estimates that the Company deems to be most critical to an understanding of Aflac’sits results of operations and financial condition are those related to the valuation of investments and derivatives, DAC, liabilities for future policy benefits and unpaid policy claims, and income taxes. The preparation and evaluation of these critical accounting estimates involve the use of various assumptions developed from management’s analyses and judgments. The


64

application of these critical accounting estimates determines the values at which 94%93% of the Company's assets and 81%80% of its liabilities are reported as

64



of December 31, 2019,2022, and thus has a direct effect on net earnings and shareholders' equity. Subsequent experience or use of other assumptions could produce significantly different results.

Valuation of Investments, Including Derivatives and Recognition of Other-than-Temporary Impairments

Aflac'sThe Company's investments, primarily consisting of debt and equity securities, include both publicly issued and privately issued securities. For publicly issued securities, the Company determines the fair values from quoted market prices readily available from public exchange markets and price quotes and valuations from third party pricing vendors. For the majority of privately issued securities and derivatives associated with VIEs within the Company's investment portfolio, a third party pricing vendor has developed valuation models that the Company utilizes to determine fair values. Starting in June 2021 and July 2022, respectively, these models and associated processes and controls were transitioned to and executed by Company personnel. For the remaining privately issued securities, the Company uses non-binding price quotes from outside brokers. The Company has refined its valuation model for private placements to explicitly incorporate currency basis swap adjustments (market observable data) to assumed interest rate curves where appropriate.

The Company estimates the fair values of its securities on a monthly basis. The Company monitors the estimated fair values obtained from its pricing vendors and brokers for consistency from month to month, while considering current market conditions. The Company also periodically discusses with its pricing brokers and vendors the pricing techniques they use to monitor the consistency of their approach and periodically assess the appropriateness of the valuation level assigned to the values obtained from them. If a fair value appears unreasonable, the Company will re-examine the inputs and assess the reasonableness of the pricing data with the vendor. Additionally, the Company may compare the inputs to relevant market indices and other performance measurements. Based on management's analysis, the valuation is confirmed or may be revised if there is evidence of a more appropriate estimate of fair value based on available market data. The Company has performed verification of the inputs and calculations in any valuation models to confirm that the valuations represent reasonable estimates of fair value. Inputs used to value derivatives include, but are not limited to, interest rates, credit spreads, foreign currency forward and spot rates, and interest volatility.

The Company routinely reviews itsestimates an expected lifetime credit loss on investments that have experienced declines inmeasured at amortized cost including held-to-maturity fixed maturity securities, loan receivables and loan commitments on a quarterly basis. For the Company’s available-for-sale fixed maturity securities, the Company evaluates estimated credit losses only when the fair value to determine if the decline is other than temporary. The identification of distressed investments, the determination of fair value if not publicly traded and the assessment of whether a decline is other than temporary involve significant management judgment. The Company must apply considerable judgment in determining the likelihood of the available-for-sale fixed maturity security recovering in value while the Company owns it. Factors that may influence this include the Company's assessment of the issuer’s abilityis below its amortized cost basis

The Company’s approach to continue making timely payments of interestestimating credit losses is complex and principal, the overall level of interest rates and credit spreads, and other factors. This process requires consideration of risks, which can be controlledincorporates significant judgments. In addition to a certain extent, suchsecurity, or an asset class, or an issuer-specific credit fundamentals, it considers past events, current economic conditions and forecasts of future economic conditions. The Company's estimates are revised as credit risk,conditions change and risks which cannot be controlled, such as interest rate risk. Management updates its evaluations regularlynew information becomes available.

See the tabular disclosure entitled "Sensitivity of Fair Values of Financial Instruments to Interest Rate Change" in Item 7A. Quantitative and reflects impairment losses in the Company's net earnings or other comprehensive income, depending on the nature of the loss, as such evaluations are revised.

SeeQualitative Disclosures About Market Risk and Notes 1, 3, 4 and 5 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs and Policy Liabilities

Insurance premiums for most of the Company's health and life policies, including cancer, accident, hospital, critical illness, dental, vision, term life, whole life, long-term care and disability, are recognized as revenueearned premiums over the premium-paying periods of the contracts when due from policyholders. When revenuesearned premiums are reported, the related amounts of benefits and expenses are charged against such revenues, so that profits are recognized in proportion to premium revenuesearned premiums during the period the policies are expected to remain in force. This association is accomplished by means of annual additions to the liability for future policy benefits and the deferral and subsequent amortization of policy acquisition costs.

Premiums from the Company's products with limited-pay features, including term life, whole life, WAYS, and child endowment, are collected over a significantly shorter period than the period over which benefits are provided. Premiums for these products are recognized as revenueearned premiums over the premium-paying periods of the contracts when due from policyholders. Any gross premium in excess of the net premium is deferred and recorded in earnings, such that profits are recognized in a constant relationship with insurance in force. Benefits are recorded as an expense when they are incurred. A liability for future policy benefits is recorded when premiums are recognized using the net premium method.



65

Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs

The calculation of DAC and the liability for future policy benefits requires the use of estimates based on sound actuarial valuation techniques. For new policy issues, the Company reviews its actuarial assumptions and deferrable acquisition costs each year and revise them when necessary to more closely reflect recent experience and studies of actual acquisition costs. For policies in force, the Company evaluates DAC by major product groupings to determine that they are recoverable from future revenues, and any amounts determined not to be recoverable are charged against net earnings. See Note 6 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a detail of the DAC activity for the past two years.

65




Policy Liabilities

The Company's policy liabilities, which are determined in accordance with applicable guidelines as defined under U.S. GAAP and Actuarial Standards of Practice, include two components that involve analysis and judgment: future policy benefits and unpaid policy claims, which accounted for 85%87% and 4%5% of total policy liabilities as of December 31, 2019,2022, respectively.

Future policy benefits provide for claims that will occur in the future and are generally calculated as the present value of future expected benefits to be incurred less the present value of future expected net benefit premiums. The Company calculates future policy benefits based on assumptions of morbidity, mortality, persistency and interest. These assumptions are generally established and considered locked at the time a policy is issued. The assumptions used in the calculations are closely related to those used in developing the gross premiums for a policy. As required by U.S. GAAP, the Company also includes a provision for adverse deviation, which is intended to accommodate adverse fluctuations in actual experience. These assumptions may only be unlocked in certain circumstances based on the results of periodic DAC recoverability and premium deficiency testing.

Unpaid policy claims include those claims that have been incurred and are in the process of payment as well as an estimate of those claims that have been incurred but have not yet been reported to the Company. The Company computes unpaid policy claims on a non-discounted basis using statistical analyses of historical claims payments, adjusted for current trends and changed conditions. The Company updates the assumptions underlying the estimate of unpaid policy claims regularly and incorporates its historical experience as well as other data that provides information regarding the Company's outstanding liability.

The Company's insurance products provide fixed-benefit amounts per occurrence that are not subject to medical-cost inflation. Furthermore, the Company's business is widely dispersed in both the U.S. and Japan. This geographic dispersion and the nature of the Company's benefit structure mitigate the risk of a significant unexpected increase in claims payments due to localized epidemics and events of a catastrophic nature. Claims incurred under Aflac'sthe Company's policies are generally reported and paid in a relatively short time frame. The unpaid claims liability is sensitive to morbidity assumptions, in particular, severity and frequency of claims. Severity is the ultimate size of a claim, and frequency is the number of claims incurred. The Company's claims experience is primarily related to the demographics of its policyholders.

As a part of its established financial reporting and accounting practices and controls, the Company performs detailed annual actuarial reviews of its policyholder liabilities (gross premium valuation analysis) and reflects the results of those reviews in its results of operations and financial condition as required by U.S. GAAP. For Aflac Japan, the Company’s annual reviews in 20192022 and 20182021 indicated no need to strengthen liabilities associated with policies in Japan. For Aflac U.S., the Company's annual reviews in 20192022 and 20182021 indicated no need to strengthen liabilities associated with policies in the U.S.



66

The table below reflects the growth of the future policy benefits liability for the years ended December 31.

Future Policy Benefits
(In millions of dollars and billions of yen)20222021
Aflac U.S.$9,960 $9,865 
Growth rate1.0 %2.0 %
Aflac Japan$71,150 $81,176 
Growth rate(12.4)%(8.4)%
Consolidated$80,749 $90,588 
Growth rate(10.9)%(7.4)%
Yen/dollar exchange rate (end of period)132.70 115.02 
Aflac Japan¥9,442 ¥9,337 
Growth rate1.1 %1.8 %
(In millions of dollars and billions of yen)2019 2018 
Aflac U.S.$9,405
 $9,137
 
Growth rate2.9%
3.8%
Aflac Japan$81,462
 $77,812
 
Growth rate4.7%
5.6%
Consolidated$90,335
 $86,368
 
Growth rate4.6%
5.5%
Yen/dollar exchange rate (end of period)109.56
 111.00
 
Aflac Japan¥8,925
 ¥8,637
 
Growth rate3.3%
3.8%

The growth of the future policy benefits liability in yen for Aflac Japan and in dollars for Aflac U.S. has been due to the aging of the Company's in-force block of business and the addition of new business.

The following table summarizes certain significant assumptions made in establishing reserves for the Company's products and the net impact that could result from changes in these assumptions should they occur. Under U.S. GAAP, the Company's reserves for its limited pay and long duration contracts are primarily calculated using locked-in assumptions. As such, the adverse hypothetical impacts illustrated in the table below are those that would increase the Company's best estimate reserves, but would not result in a premium deficiency requiring strengthening of reserves or write-off of DAC. The favorable hypothetical impacts in the table below would decrease the Company's best estimate reserves but they would not result in an immediate decrease to its U.S. GAAP reserves (given that the Company would be required to leave the current assumptions locked in); rather, the positive impacts would be recognized in net earnings over the life of the policies in force.

The information below is for illustrative purposes and includes the impacts of changes in a single assumption and not changes in any combination of assumptions. As a result of emerging experience, changes in current assumptions and the related impact that could result in the listed financial statement balances that are in excess of the amounts illustrated may occur in future periods.
AssumptionCurrent AssumptionAssumption Change
Increase (Decrease) in Best Estimate Reserves
    (in millions) (1)
Investment returnExpected portfolio book yields over the life of the businessIncrease 25 basis points / Decrease 25 basis points$(2,102) to $2,277
Expected future claim payments / base mortalityPricing expectations adjusted to best estimate based on Company experienceIncrease / Decrease Expected Future Claim Payments: +5% to -5%$4,994 to $(4,994)
Total termination ratesPricing expectations adjusted to best estimate based on Company experienceIncrease / Decrease Expected Total Termination Rates: +5% to -5%$(434) to $600
(1) Best estimate reserves are equal to the present value of claims, cash values, expenses, and commissions minus the present value of gross premiums, using current best estimate assumptions.

In computing the estimate of unpaid policy claims, the Company considers many factors, including the benefits and amounts available under the policy; the volume and demographics of the policies exposed to claims; and internal business practices, such as incurred date assignment and current claim administrative practices. The Company monitors these conditions closely and makemakes adjustments to the liability as actual experience emerges. Claim levels are generally stable from period to period; however, fluctuations in claim levels may occur. In calculating the unpaid policy claim liability, the Company

66



does not calculate a range of estimates. The following table shows the expected sensitivity of the unpaid policy claims liability as of December 31, 2019,2022, to changes in severity and frequency of claims.



67

Sensitivity of Unpaid Policy Claims Liability
(In millions)Total Severity
Total FrequencyDecrease
by 2%
Decrease
by 1%
UnchangedIncrease
by 1%
Increase
by 2%
Increase by 2%$(1)$24 $49 $74 $99 
Increase by 1%(25)24 49 74 
Unchanged(49)(24)24 49 
Decrease by 1%(73)(49)(24)24 
Decrease by 2%(97)(73)(49)(25)(1)
(In millions) Total Severity 
Total FrequencyDecrease
by 2%
 Decrease
by 1%
 Unchanged Increase
by 1%
 Increase
by 2%
Increase by 2% $0
   $25
   $50
   $76
   $101
 
Increase by 1% (25)   0
   25
   50
   76
 
Unchanged (49)   (25)   0
   25
   50
 
Decrease by 1% (73)   (49)   (25)   0
   25
 
Decrease by 2% (97)   (73)   (49)   (25)   0
 

Other policy liabilities, which accounted for 11%9% of total policy liabilities as of December 31, 2019,2022, consisted primarily of annuity and unearned premium reserves, and discounted advance premiums on deposit from policyholders in conjunction with their purchase of certain Aflac Japan insurance products. These advanced premiums are deferred upon collection and recognized as premium revenueearned premiums over the contractual premium payment period. Advanced premiums represented 24%11% and 29%15% of the December 31, 20192022 and 20182021 other policy liabilities balances, respectively. See the Aflac Japan segment subsection of this MD&A for further information.

Income Taxes

Income tax provisions are generally based on pretax earnings reported for financial statement purposes, which differ from those amounts used in preparing the Company's income tax returns. Deferred income taxes are recognized for temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and income tax basis of assets and liabilities, based on enacted tax laws and statutory tax rates applicable to the periods in which the Company expects the temporary differences to reverse. The evaluation of a tax position in accordance with U.S. GAAP is a two-step process. Under the first step, the enterprise determines whether it is more likely than not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination by taxing authorities. The second step is measurement, whereby a tax position that meets the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold is measured to determine the amount of benefit to recognize in the financial statements. A valuation allowance is established for deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that an amount will not be realized. The determination of a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets requires management to make certain judgments and assumptions.

In evaluating the ability to recover deferred tax assets, the Company's management considers all available evidence, including taxable income in open carry back years, the existence of cumulative losses in the most recent years, forecasted earnings, future taxable income exclusive of reversing temporary differences and carryforwards, future taxable temporary difference reversals, and prudent and feasible tax planning strategies. In the event the Company determines it is not more likely than not that it will be able to realize all or part of its deferred tax assets in the future, a valuation allowance would be charged to earnings in the period such determination is made. Likewise, if it is later determined that it is more likely than not that those deferred tax assets would be realized, the previously provided valuation allowance would be reversed. Future economic conditions and market volatility, including increases in interest rates or widening credit spreads, can adversely impact the Company’s tax planning strategies and in particular the Company’s ability to utilize tax benefits on previously recognized capital losses. The Company's judgments and assumptions are subject to change given the inherent uncertainty in predicting future performance and specific industry and investment market conditions.

Aflac Japan holds certain U.S. dollar-denominated assets in a DST. These assets are mostly comprised of various U.S. dollar-denominated commercial mortgage loans. The functional currency of the DST for U.S. tax purposes was historically the Japanese yen. In 2022, the Company requested a change in tax accounting method through the Internal Revenue Service's automatic consent procedures to change its functional currency on the DST for U.S. tax purposes to the U.S. dollar. As a result, foreign currency translation gains or losses on assets held in the DST will no longer be recognized for U.S. tax purposes. The Company historically recorded a deferred tax liability for foreign currency translation gains on the DST assets, which was released in the third quarter of 2022 as a result of the functional currency change and subsequently adjusted for foreign currency impacts in the fourth quarter of 2022. This change in functional currency resulted in the Company recognizing an income tax benefit of $452 million ($0.71 per basic and diluted share, respectively) in 2022.

An increase or decrease in the Company's effective tax rate by one percentage point would have resulted in an increase or decrease in the Company's 2022 income tax expense of $42 million.

For additional information on income tax, see Note 10 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements presented in this report.


6768



Future Adoption of Accounting Standard for Long-Duration Insurance Contracts

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASUAccounting Standards Update (ASU) 2018-12, “Financial Services - Insurance, Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Long-Duration Contracts” (LDTI). The update which is expected to significantly changechanges how insurers account for long-duration contracts and amends existing recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure requirements applicable to the Company. Issues addressed in the new guidance include: 1) a requirement to review and, if there is a change, update cash flow assumptions for the liability for future policy benefits (LFPB) at least annually, and to update the discount rate assumption quarterly, 2) accounting for market risk benefits at fair value, 3) simplified amortization for deferred acquisition costs, and 4) enhanced financial statement presentation and disclosures. In November 2019,The Company has no products with market risk benefits.

Since the initial issuance, the FASB issuedhas deferred the ASU 2019-09, “Financial Services - Insurance (Topic 944): Effective Date”, which defers the effective date of ASU 2018-12 for all entities. Thetwo years, such that the amendments are now effective for public business entities that meet the definition of an SEC filer, excluding entities eligible to be smaller reporting companies as defined by the SEC,Company for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2021. Early application2022. The amended guidance is to be applied as of the amendments is permitted, however,beginning of the Company does not expect to early adoptearliest period presented, beginning on the updated standard.January 1, 2021 transition date (Transition Date).

The Company is thoroughly evaluatingwill conclude implementation efforts and adopt the impactamendments as of ASU 2018-12January 1, 2023. The adoption and expects it will have a significant impact on the Company’s reported financial position, results of operations, and disclosures under U.S. GAAP accounting.disclosures. The Company anticipates that the requirement to update assumptions for liability for future policy benefitsthe LFPB will have a significant impact on itsthe Company's results of operations, systems, processes and controls whileand the requirement to update the discount raterates will have a significant impact on its AOCI and equity. The Company currently has no products with market risk benefits.

There are two permitted transition methods upon adoption. The default transition method is a modified retrospective approach or companies may elect to applyadoption and the amendments using a full retrospective approach.

UnderCompany has selected the modified retrospective method, the opening reserve balance at the transition date, January 1, 2020, would generally be the same as the closing balance before transition; however, it would be updated for changes in the discount rate required under the new guidance.

Regardless of the transition method selected, themethod. The new guidance requires that discount rates used for the discounting of insurance liabilities be initially adjusted on the adoption date and subsequently at each reporting period to the market levels for the upper-medium-grade (low credit risk) fixed income instrument yields (single-A in the currency of the underlying insurance contract) reflecting the duration of the company’sCompany’s insurance liabilities. Long duration of the Company’s third-sector insurance liabilities in Japan coupled with limited-to-no-liquidity of the Japanese long-dated fixed-income market creates challenges in application of the market-based discount rate guidance and will require the Company to apply significant judgments in designing discount rate methodologies for its Japanese third-sector liabilities. The update of the discount rate would be recognized in AOCI under both transition methods.

Under the full retrospective method, the Company would restate all historical periods based upon actual historical experience as of contract inception and its updated view of the contractual cash flow projections at transition. A cumulative catch-up adjustment to opening retained earnings would be recognized to reflect the actual experience and updated projections. Companies are permitted to apply a full retrospective transition approach if actual historical information is available for all contracts that will be affected by the new guidance.

The Company has selectedprimary impact on transition under the modified retrospective transition method.

method is driven by updating discount rates that increase reserves and lower AOCI by the corresponding amount, net of tax. The Company expects that under either transition method, theTransition Date impact from adoption will result in a decrease in AOCI of approximately $18.6 billion and a decrease in retained earnings of approximately $-0.3 billion. The impact to AOCI results from updating discount rate assumptions from the rates locked in for reserves held as of the Transition Date to rates determined by reference to the Transition Date market level yields for upper-medium-grade (low credit risk) fixed income instruments (as of December 31, 2020). The decrease in AOCI as of January 1, 2023 will be reduced to approximately $2.1 billion due to rising interest rates and a weakening of the yen.

As discussed in detail in Note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, the Company has designed its discount rate methodology for both the U.S. and Japan insurance business. Under the provisions of the new ASU, discount rates are updated each reporting period.

The impact to the Company’s reported financial statements under U.S. GAAP will beis greatly influenced by the nature of the Company’s business model. Adoption of the new guidance will reflectreflects the Company’s concentration in Japan third-sector business, in particular cancer insurance, with respect to which the duration of liabilities is materially longer than asset durations, while Japan’s aggregate block of business continues to see favorable experience from mortality, morbidity, and expenses. The long duration of the Company’s third-sector insurance liabilities in Japan coupled with limited-to-no-liquidity of the Japanese long-dated fixed-income market creates challenges in application of the market-based discount rate guidance and requires the Company to apply significant judgments in the discount rate methodologies for its Japanese third-sector liabilities. Under the modified retrospective method, the impact of a low discount rate applied to long-duration third sector liabilities is recognized at adoption, while associated favorable morbidity margins are recognized over time thus driving a pronounced timing impact to U.S. GAAP equity. In addition, with respect to the Japan segment, the Company maintains a large portfolio of assets designated as held-to-maturity (HTM) as a strategy to reduce capital (solvency margin ratio or SMR) volatility. In a low interest rate environment, such as presently exists in Japan, assets designated as HTM that were purchased in a higher interest rate environment have significant embedded gains not reflected in AOCI (HTM securities are carried at amortized cost under U.S. GAAP), which serves as an economic offset to a low discount rate applied to policy liabilities. At December 31, 2019,2022, the Company’s HTM portfolio was $30.1$19.1 billion at amortized cost and had $7.5$2.2 billion in net unrealized gains. PursuantAs of December 31, 2020 (just prior to the implementation of ASU 2019-04, ”Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses, Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, and Topic 825, Financial

68



Instruments” (see Note 1 for additional details of this ASU), effective on January 1, 2020,2021 Transition Date), the Company anticipates the reclassification of approximately $6.9Company’s HTM portfolio was $24.5 billion (atat amortized cost) of pre-payable fixed maturity securities from the HTM to the available-for-sale (AFS) category. This reclassification is expected to resultcost and had $5.9 billion in recording in AOCI a net unrealized gain of approximately $800 million on an after-tax basis based on the securities’ fair values on the reclassification date.gains. After adoption of ASU 2018-12, the Company also expects net earnings and net earnings per share (which were $3.3 billion and $4.43 per diluted share, respectively, in 2019) to reflect larger quarterly fluctuations duein periods that the future cash flow assumptions are updated, which are used to calculate the new requirement to update assumptions for liability for future policy benefits. See Note 1 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the


As an example69

impacts to the potentialCompany's consolidated statements of earnings for the years ended December 31, 2022, and 2021, as restated under LDTI.

The following table presents the expected impacts from the adoption of ASU 2018-12 to the Company's previously reported operating ratios for the years ended December 31.
As ReportedAs Adjusted
2022202120222021
Aflac Japan: (1)
Ratios to total premiums:
Benefits and claims, net68.8 %67.0 %67.4 %67.9 %
Ratios to total adjusted revenues:
Total adjusted expenses21.5 21.6 20.3 20.5 
Aflac U.S.:
Ratios to total premiums:
Benefits and claims, net43.8 %43.6 %45.9 %47.0 %
Ratios to total adjusted revenues:
Total adjusted expenses41.9 39.5 39.7 38.4 
(1) Includes the impact of the new guidance, and for illustrative purposes only,deferred profit liability reclassification discussed in Note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

For the year ended December 31, 2022, as restated under the modified retrospective methodnew ASU, benefit ratios are lower for Aflac Japan and higher for Aflac U.S., while expense ratios are modestly lower due to amortizing deferred acquisition costs at a slower rate. This results in a low interest rate environment,modestly higher pretax profit margin for Aflac Japan and a slightly higher pretax profit margin for Aflac U.S.

For the Company would expect AOCI (which was $6.6 billion atyear ended December 31, 2019) to significantly decline upon adoption2021, as restated under the new ASU, benefit ratios are higher for Aflac Japan and to thereafter reflect larger quarterly fluctuationsAflac U.S., while expense ratios are modestly lower due to the new requirement to quarterly adjust discount rates. Conversely,amortizing deferred acquisition costs at a slower rate. This results in a slightly higher interest rate environment,pretax profit margin for Aflac Japan and assuminga modestly lower pretax profit margin for Aflac U.S.

Prior to adoption of the modified retrospective method,ASU, pandemic-related low claim experience is recognized in earnings in the Company would expect AOCI to decline less or even increase (depending onreporting period when low claims are experienced, whereas under the specificsnew ASU, this pandemic-related low claim experience is recognized in line with experience-related remeasurement and potentially through annual assumptions updates, i.e., partially during the reporting period with the remainder recognized over the remaining expected life of the interest rate environment), as well as to reflect quarterly fluctuations. Under the full retrospective method, the Company would expect lesser declines or increases in total equity upon adoption compared to the modified retrospective method due to the potential offsetting effect from updating experience and cash flow projections.

each cohort.

The ultimate impact on these items from the Company’sCompany has created a robust governance framework to support implementation of the updated standard is subject to assessments that are dependent on many variables, including but not limited to (i) the transition method selected bystandard. As part of its implementation, the Company (ii) how certain aspectshas made relevant policy elections, which are outlined in Note 1 of the new standard will be interpretedNotes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The Company has also completed the modernization of its actuarial technology platform to enhance its modeling, data management, experience study and implemented byanalytical capabilities, increase the Companyend-to-end automation of key reporting and other similar companies, such as (but not limited to) amortization of deferred acquisition costs and selection of discounting methodologies and inputs, as well as establishment of policies,analytical processes and controls for setting, monitoring and periodically updating reserve assumptions, and (iii) changes in the interest rate environment in the US and Japan. The impact on transition under the modified retrospective method will be driven by updating discount rates that will increase reserves and lower AOCI by the corresponding amount.

optimize its control framework. The Company expects that whilehas also put in place internal controls related to the new processes created as part of implementing the updated standard.

The adoption of this new accounting guidance will affect the Company’s financial statements under U.S. GAAP, it will not impact financial statements for Aflac Japan under FSA requirements or for Aflac U.S. under applicable statutory requirements. Therefore, the Company does not expect adoption of the updated standard todoes not impact itsthe Company's overall cash flows, subsidiaries’ dividend capacity or their ability to meet applicable regulatory capital standards, nor does it affect the Company anticipate adoption to affect itsCompany's existing debt covenants or strategies for capital deployment.

New Accounting Pronouncements

During the last three years, various accounting standard-setting bodies have been active in soliciting comments and issuing statements, interpretations and exposure drafts. For information on new accounting pronouncements and the impact, if any, on the Company's financial position or results of operations, see Note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The Company is exposed primarily to the following types of market risks: currency risk, interest rate risk, credit risk and equity risk. Fluctuations in these factors could impact the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial


70

condition. The Company regularly monitors its market risks and uses a variety of strategies to manage its exposure
to these market risks.

Currency Risk

Aflac Japan

The functional currency of Aflac Japan's insurance operations is the Japanese yen. Aflac Japan’s premiums and a significant portion of its investment income are received in yen, and its claims and most expenses are paid in yen. Aflac Japan purchases yen-denominated assets and U.S. dollar-denominated assets, which may be hedged to yen, to support yen-denominated policy liabilities. These and other yen-denominated financial statement items are, however, translated into U.S. dollars for financial reporting purposes. Most of Aflac Japan's cash and liabilities are yen-denominated.

The Company engages in hedging activities to mitigate certain currency risks from holding U.S. dollar-denominated investments in Aflac Japan. However,Japan; however, this hedging program also has some inherent risks. There is a risk that in turn poses a countervailing long-term risk of loss on hedging currency derivatives under the long-term scenario of long-term yen weakening yen, and relatedthere could be significant derivative rollover risklosses that could amplify hedge cost in unfavorable market conditions and significantly increasecreate corresponding liquidity requirements to support negativeinterim derivative

69



settlements. Further, the derivatives used for hedging are shorter in duration than the hedged investments, so there is rollover risk. In unfavorable market environments, the rollover of derivatives throughout the hedging period could result in increased hedge costs. Additionally, as discussed in detail in the Risk Factors section titled “Lack of availability of acceptable yen-denominated investments could adversely affect the Company’sCompany's results of operations, financial position or liquidity,” there is a risk that losses realized on derivative settlements during periods of weakening yen may not be recouped through realization of the corresponding holding currency gains on the hedged U.S. dollar-denominated investments if these investments are not ultimately sold and converted to yen.

The Company has taken steps to refine the strategy to mitigate currency exposure of Aflac Japan from U.S. dollar-denominated investments while balancing the consideration of the economic equity surplus in Aflac Japan. This refinement in strategy resulted in an increased amount of the unhedged U.S. dollar-denominated investments held in Aflac Japan while at the same time mitigating hedge cost increases. Generally,, Aflac Japan’s exposure to the currency risk increases when its portfolio of unhedged U.S. dollar-denominated investments increases. As the value of the U.S. dollar-denominated investment portfolio in Aflac Japan fluctuates and the Company’s business model evolves, the Company periodically reevaluates this size of the unhedged portfolio and may accordingly adjust up or down its currency hedging targets. See additional discussion in the Risk Factors section titled "The Company is exposed to foreign currency fluctuations in the yen/dollar exchange rate."

The Parent Company

The Company is exposed to currency risk as an economic event when yen funds are actually converted into U.S. dollars. This occurs when yen-denominated funds are paid as dividends and management fees from Aflac Japan to the Parent Company and with quarterly settlements of its reinsurance retrocession transactions. The exchange rates prevailing at the time of yen payments will differ from the exchange rates prevailing at the time the yen profits were earned. AThe Company may use a portion of the yen dividend and management fee payments may be used to service Aflac Incorporated's yen-denominated notes payable with the remainder converted into U.S. dollars.

In addition to yen payments and the reinsurance retrocessions, certain investment activities for Aflac Japan expose the Company to economic currency risk when yen are converted into U.S. dollars. As noted above, the Company invests a portion of its yen cash flows in U.S. dollar-denominated assets. This requires that the Company convert the yen cash flows to U.S. dollars before investing. As previously discussed, for certain of its U.S. dollar-denominated securities, the Company enters into foreign currency forward and option contracts to hedge the currency risk on the fair value of hedged investments. In 2018,Additionally, the Parent Company enteredenters into forward contracts to accomplish a dual objective of hedging foreign currency rate risk to dividend payments by Aflac Japan, and reducing enterprise-wide hedge costs. The Company also balances the volume of hedging instruments between forwards and options in an attempt to manage and balance the risks associated with collateral, hedge costs and cash settlements. If the markets experience a significant strengthening of yen, this could cause cash strain at the Parent Company as a result of cash collateral and potentially cash settlement requirements. Based on the timing and severity of exchange rate fluctuations combined with the level of outstanding activity in this program, the cash strain at the Parent Company could be significant.

Aside from the activities discussed above, the Company generally does not convert yen into U.S. dollars; however, it does translate financial statement amounts from yen into U.S. dollars for financial reporting purposes. Therefore, reported amounts are affected by foreign currency fluctuations. The Company reports unrealized foreign currency translation gains and losses in AOCI. In periods when the yen weakens against the dollar, translating yen into dollars causes fewer dollars


71

to be reported. When the yen strengthens, translating yen into U.S. dollars causes more U.S. dollars to be reported. The weakening of the yen relative to the U.S. dollar will generally adversely affect the value of the Company's yen-denominated investments in U.S. dollar terms. The Company also considers the economic equity surplus in Aflac Japan and related exposure to foreign currency. The Company manages this currency risk by investing a portion of Aflac Japan's investment portfolio in U.S. dollar-denominated securities and by the Parent Company's issuance of yen-denominated debt. As a result, the effect of currency fluctuations on the Company's net assets is reduced.

The following table demonstrates the effect of foreign currency fluctuations by presenting the dollar values of the Company's yen-denominated assets and liabilities, and its consolidated yen-denominated net asset exposure at selected exchange rates as of December 31.

70



Dollar Value of Yen-Denominated Assets and Liabilities
at Selected Exchange Rates
(In millions)20222021
Yen/dollar exchange rates117.70 
132.70 (1)
147.70 100.02 
115.02 (1)
130.02 
Yen-denominated financial instruments:
Assets:
Securities available for sale: (2)
Fixed maturity securities (3)
$48,591 $43,102 $38,730 $65,733 $57,160 $50,566 
Fixed maturity securities - consolidated
variable interest entities
(4)
636 564 506 951 827 731 
Securities held to maturity: (2)
Fixed maturity securities21,485 19,056 17,121 25,299 22,000 19,462 
Equity securities755 670 602 856 744 659 
Cash and cash equivalents1,077 955 858 1,239 1,078 953 
Derivatives731 617 977 941 936 2,120 
Other financial instruments247 219 196 261 227 200 
Subtotal73,522 65,183 58,990 95,280 82,972 74,691 
Liabilities:
Notes payable4,838 4,290 3,854 4,150 3,603 3,193 
Derivatives1,386 1,698 2,205 1,125 1,619 3,035 
Subtotal6,224 5,988 6,059 5,275 5,222 6,228 
Net yen-denominated financial instruments67,298 59,195 52,931 90,005 77,750 68,463 
Other yen-denominated assets7,891 6,999 6,288 9,268 8,059 7,130 
Other yen-denominated liabilities94,340 83,680 75,186 113,564 98,754 87,361 
Consolidated yen-denominated net assets
(liabilities) subject to foreign currency
fluctuation
(2)
$(19,151)$(17,486)$(15,967)$(14,291)$(12,945)$(11,768)
(In millions)2019 2018 
Yen/dollar exchange rates94.56
 
109.56 (1)

 124.56
 96.00
 
111.00(1)

 126.00
 
Yen-denominated financial instruments:            
Assets:            
Securities available for sale:            
Fixed maturity securities (2)
$60,391
 $52,123
 $45,846
 $55,600
 $48,086
 $42,362
 
Fixed maturity securities - consolidated
variable interest entities
(3)
995
 858
 755
 941
 814
 717
 
Securities held to maturity:            
Fixed maturity securities34,858
 30,085
 26,462
 35,055
 30,318
 26,709
 
Equity securities763
 658
 579
 742
 641
 565
 
Cash and cash equivalents1,296
 1,119
 984
 988
 855
 753
 
Derivatives2,718
 482
 2,457
 2,712
 417
 949
 
Other financial instruments271
 234
 205
 253
 219
 192
 
Subtotal101,292
 85,559
 77,288
 96,291
 81,350
 72,247
 
Liabilities:            
Notes payable2,968
 2,558
 2,253
 2,120
 1,831
 1,615
 
Derivatives1,807
 586
 3,463
 1,318
 387
 2,138
 
Subtotal4,775
 3,144
 5,716
 3,438
 2,218
 3,753
 
Net yen-denominated financial instruments96,517
 82,415
 71,572
 92,853
 79,132
 68,494
 
Other yen-denominated assets10,304
 8,893
 7,822
 10,795
 9,336
 8,225
 
Other yen-denominated liabilities118,869
 102,595
 90,240
 113,994
 98,590
 86,853
 
Consolidated yen-denominated net assets
(liabilities) subject to foreign currency
fluctuation
(2)
$(12,048) $(11,287) $(10,846) $(10,346) $(10,122) $(10,134) 
(1) Actual period-end exchange rate
(2) Net of allowance for credit losses
(3) Does not include the U.S. dollar-denominated corporate bonds for which the Company has entered into foreign currency derivatives as discussed in the Aflac Japan Investment subsection of MD&A
(3)(4) Does not include U.S. dollar-denominated bonds that have corresponding cross-currency swaps in consolidated VIEs

The Company is required to consolidate certain VIEs. Some of the consolidated VIEs in Aflac Japan's portfolio use foreign currency swaps to convert foreign denominated cash flows to yen, the functional currency of Aflac Japan, in order to minimize cash flow fluctuations. Foreign currency swaps exchange an initial principal amount in two currencies, agreeing to re-exchange the currencies at a future date, at an agreed upon exchange rate. There may also be periodic exchanges of payments at specified intervals based on the agreed upon rates and notional amounts. Prior to consolidation, the Company's beneficial interest in these VIEs was a yen-denominated available-for-sale fixed maturity security. Upon consolidation, the original yen-denominated investment was derecognized and the underlying fixed maturity securities and cross-currency swaps were recognized. The combination of a U.S. dollar-denominated investment and cross-currency swap economically creates a yen-denominated investment and has no impact on the Company's net investment hedge position.


72


Similarly, the combination of the U.S. corporate bonds and the foreign currency forwards and options that the Company has entered into, as discussed in the Aflac Japan Investment subsection of MD&A, economically creates a yen-denominated investment that qualifies for inclusion as a component of the Company's investment in Aflac Japan for net investment hedge purposes.

For additional information regarding the Company's Aflac Japan net investment hedge, see the Hedging Activities subsection of MD&A.


71



Interest Rate Risk

The Company's primary interest rate exposure is to the impact of changes in interest rates on the fair value of its investments in debt securities. Significant increases in interest rates could cause declines in the values of the Company's investment portfolio which will also have a secondary impact on the Company's overall evaluation of its deferred tax asset position. The Company monitors its investment portfolio on a quarterly basis utilizing a full valuation methodology, measuring price volatility, and sensitivity of the fair values of its investments to interest rate changes on the debt securities the Company owns. For example, if the current duration of a debt security is 10 years, then the fair value of that security will increase by approximately 10% if market interest rates decrease by 100 basis points, assuming all other factors remain constant. Likewise, the fair value of the debt security will decrease by approximately 10% if market interest rates increase by 100 basis points, assuming all other factors remain constant.

The estimated effect of potential increases in interest rates on the fair values of debt securities the Company owns; derivatives, excluding credit default swaps, and notes payable as of December 31 follows:

Sensitivity of Fair Values of Financial Instruments
to Interest Rate Changes
2019 2018 20222021
(In millions)Fair
Value
+100
Basis
Points
 Fair
Value
+100
Basis
Points
(In millions)Fair
Value
+100
Basis
Points
Fair
Value
+100
Basis
Points
Assets:         Assets:
Debt securities:         Debt securities:
Fixed maturity securities:          Fixed maturity securities:
Yen-denominated $90,575
 $78,193
 $85,622
 $73,673
  Yen-denominated$64,876 $57,535 $84,856 $74,186 
Dollar-denominated 38,281
 35,013
 33,995
 31,327
  Dollar-denominated32,075 29,551 40,709 37,168 
Total debt securities $128,856
 $113,206
 $119,617
 $105,000
  Total debt securities$96,951 $87,086 $125,565 $111,354 
Commercial mortgage and other loans $9,648
 $9,540
 $6,893
 $6,834
 Commercial mortgage and other loans$13,212 $13,136 $11,996 $11,881 
Derivatives $482
 $527
 $417
 $614
 Derivatives$617 $669 $936 $958 
Liabilities:         Liabilities:
Notes payable (1)
 $6,935
 $6,065
 $5,876
 $5,415
 
Notes payable (1)
$6,826 $6,368 $8,539 $7,882 
Derivatives 586
 463
 387
 422
 Derivatives1,698 1,542 1,619 1,419 
(1) Excludes lease obligations

There are various factors that affect the fair value of the Company's investment in debt securities. Included in those factors are changes in the prevailing interest rate environment, which directly affect the balance of unrealized gains or losses for a given period in relation to a prior period. Decreases in market yields generally improve the fair value of debt securities, while increases in market yields generally have a negative impact on the fair value of the Company's debt securities. However, the Company does not expect to realize a majority of any unrealized gains or losses. For additional information on unrealized losses on debt securities, see Note 3 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

The Company attempts to match the duration of its assets with the duration of its liabilities. The following table presents the approximate duration of Aflac Japan's yen-denominated assets and liabilities, along with premiums, as of December 31.


73

(In years)2019 2018 (In years)20222021
Yen-denominated debt securities15
 16
 Yen-denominated debt securities13 14 
Policy benefits and related expenses to be paid in future years14
 15
 Policy benefits and related expenses to be paid in future years14 14 
Premiums to be received in future years on policies in force10
 10
 Premiums to be received in future years on policies in force10 10 

The following table presents the approximate duration of Aflac U.S. dollar-denominated assets and liabilities, along with premiums, as of December 31.
(In years)20222021
Dollar-denominated debt securities7 
Policy benefits and related expenses to be paid in future years8 
Premiums to be received in future years on policies in force7 
(In years)2019 2018 
Dollar-denominated debt securities9
 9
 
Policy benefits and related expenses to be paid in future years8
 8
 
Premiums to be received in future years on policies in force6
 6
 


72



The following table shows a comparison of average required interest rates for future policy benefits and investment yields, based on amortized cost, for the years ended December 31.
Comparison of Interest Rates for Future Policy Benefits
and Investment Yields
(Net of Investment Expenses)
  20222021
  U.S.        JapanU.S.        Japan
Policies issued during year:
Required interest on policy reserves3.00 %1.22 %(1)3.00 %.96 %(1)
New money yield on investments4.92 4.29 3.19 3.34 
Policies in force at year-end:
Required interest on policy reserves4.99 2.98 (1)5.10 3.05 (1)
Portfolio book yield, end of period5.15 2.87 4.72 2.44 
  20192018
  U.S.        JapanU.S.        Japan
Policies issued during year:            
Required interest on policy reserves 3.68%  .96%
(1) 
 3.69%  1.00%
(1) 
New money yield on investments 4.33
  3.70
  4.44
  2.94
 
Policies in force at year-end:            
Required interest on policy reserves 5.26
  3.20
(1) 
 5.34
  3.29
(1) 
Portfolio book yield, end of period 5.22
  2.51
  5.44
  2.49
 
(1)Represents investments for Aflac Japan that support policy obligations and therefore excludes Aflac Japan’s annuity products

Aflac Japan investment yields above includes U.S. dollar–denominateddollar-denominated investment yields prior to factoring in amortized hedge costs. The Company continues to monitor the spread between its new money yield and the required interest assumption for newly issued products in both the U.S. and Japan and will re-evaluate those assumptions as necessary. Currently, when investments the Company owns mature, the proceeds may be reinvested at a yield below that of the interest required for the accretion of policy benefit liabilities on policies issued in earlier years. Overall, adequate profit margins exist in Aflac Japan's aggregate block of business because of changes in the mix of business and favorable experience from mortality, morbidity and expenses.

The Company holds investments and has issued debt with interest rates based on USD LIBOR, and also holds derivatives that reference USD LIBOR. Regulatory and industry initiatives to eliminateThe upcoming cessation of USD LIBOR as an interest rate benchmark may create uncertainty in the valuation of USD LIBOR-based loans, as well as for other USD LIBOR-based derivatives and assets. This may adversely impact both pricing and liquidity in such instruments. The Company is preparinghas prepared for the expected discontinuation of USD LIBOR by identifying, assessing and monitoring risks associated with USD LIBOR transition. Preparation includesincluded taking steps to update operational processes (including to support alternative reference rates) and models, as well as evaluating legacy contracts for any changes that may be required, including the determination of applicable fallbacks.

Periodically, the Company may enter into derivative transactions to hedge interest rate risk, depending on general economic conditions. In 2022, the Company expanded the use of interest rate swaps in its hedging strategy, which is designed to help manage the Company's sensitivity to interest rates. For additional information on interest rate derivatives, see the Hedging Activities subsection of MD&A and Note 4 of the accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.



74

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Credit Risk

A significant portion of the Company's investment portfolio consists of debt securities and loans that expose it to the credit risk of the underlying issuer or borrower. The Company carefully evaluates this risk on every new investment and closely monitors the credit risk of its existing investment portfolio. The Company incorporates the needs of its products and liabilities, the overall requirements of the business, and other factors in addition to its underwriting of the credit risk for each investment in the portfolio.

Evaluating the underlying risks in the Company's credit portfolio involves a multitude of factors including but not limited to its assessment of the issuer's or borrower's business activities, assets, products, market position, financial condition, and future prospects.prospects, including sustainability of the issuer’s or borrower’s business and the impact of environmental, social and governance-related factors. The Company incorporates the assessment of the NRSROs in assigning credit ratings and incorporates the rating methodologies of its external managers in assigning loan ratings to portfolio holdings. The Company performs extensive internal assessments of the credit risks for all its portfolio holdings and potential new investments, which includes using analyses provided by the Company's specialist external managers. For assets managed by external asset managers, the Company provides investment and credit risk parameters that must be used when making investment decisions and requires ongoing monitoring and reporting from the asset managers on significant changes in credit risks within the portfolio.

Investment Concentrations

The Company's 15 largest fixed-maturity security global investment exposures were as follows:

Largest Global Fixed Maturity Security Investment Positions
(In millions)
December 31, 2022
Total% of Total
No.Consolidated Corporate/Sovereign ExposureConsolidatedFixed MaturityCredit
Book ValueSecuritiesRating
1
Japan National Government (1)
$42,618 45.09 %A+
2Bank of America NA339 .36 
MUFG Bank, Ltd.226 .24 A
MUFG Bank, Ltd.113 .12 A-
3MUFG Bank, Ltd.339 .36 
Bank Of America Corp188 .20 A
Bank Of America Corp151 .16 BBB+
4Investcorp SA329 .35 BB
5E.On International Finance Bv320 .34 BBB
6Banobras279 .30 BBB-
7Nordea Bank AB258 .27 A-
8AXA252 .27 A
9Walt Disney Co.246 .26 A-
10Deutsche Telekom AG246 .26 BBB+
11CFE240 .25 BBB
12Japan Expressway Holding and Debt240 .25 A+
13AT&T Inc.239 .25 BBB
14Petroleos Mexicanos (Pemex)226 .24 BB-
15Czech (Republic Of)226 .24 AA-
                 Subtotal$46,397 49.08 % 
Total fixed maturity securities$94,525 100.00 %
(1)JGBs or JGB-backed securities
73


75

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Investment Concentrations

The Company's 15 largest global investment exposures were as follows:

Largest Global Investment Positions
(In millions)
December 31, 2019
    Total % of Total  
No. Consolidated Corporate/Sovereign Exposure Consolidated Fixed Maturity Credit
    Book Value Securities Rating
1 
Japan National Government (1)
 $51,726
 47.26% A+
2 Bank of America NA 416
 .38
  
      Bank of America Corp. 233
 .21
 A
      Bank of America Corp. 183
 .17
 BBB+
3 Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd. 411
 .38
 A-
4 Investcorp SA 388
 .35
 BB
5 Republic of South Africa 365
 .33
 BB+
6 Banobras 338
 .31
 BBB+
7 Walt Disney Co. 330
 .30
 A
8 Nordea Bank AB 306
 .28
  
      Nordea Bank AB 234
 .21
 A-
      Nordea Bank AB 72
 .07
 BBB+
9 AXA 296
 .27
 BBB+
10 Japan Expswy Hld and Debt 295
 .27
 A+
11 Deutsche Telekom AG 295
 .27
 BBB+
12 AT&T Inc. 293
 .27
 BBB
13 CFE 291
 .27
 BBB+
14 Petroleos Mexicanos (Pemex) 274
 .25
 BBB-
15 Czech Republic 274
 .25
 AA-
                   Subtotal $56,298
 51.44%  
  Total fixed maturity securities $109,456
 100.00%  
(1)JGBs or JGB-backed securities
As previously disclosed, the Company owns long-dated debt instruments in support of its long-dated policyholder obligations. Some of the Company's largest global investment holdings are positions that were purchased many years ago and increased in size due to merger and consolidation activity among the issuing entities. In addition, many of the Company's largest holdings are yen-denominated, therefore strengthening of the yen can increase its position in dollars, and weakening of the yen can decrease its position in dollars. The Company's global investment guidelines establish concentration limits for its investment portfolios.

Geographical Exposure

The following table indicates the geographic exposure of the Company's debt securities as of December 31.

74


Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

2019 2018 20222021
(In millions)Amortized Cost % of
Total
 Amortized Cost % of
Total
 (In millions)Amortized Cost% of
Total
Amortized Cost% of
Total
Japan$56,020
 51.2% $55,486
 51.8% Japan$46,539 49.2 %$54,701 50.9 %
United States and Canada (1)
30,321
 27.7
 29,371
 27.4
 
United States and CanadaUnited States and Canada28,547 30.2 30,971 28.8 
United Kingdom3,371
 3.1
 3,038
 2.8
 United Kingdom3,014 3.2 3,473 3.2 
Germany2,441
 2.2
 2,179
 2.0
 Germany2,074 2.0 2,448 2.3 
France2,261
 2.1
 2,030
 1.9
 France1,870 2.0 2,112 2.0 
Peripheral Eurozone1,788
 1.6
 2,165
 2.0
 Peripheral Eurozone1,788 1.9 1,916 1.8 
Portugal91
 .1
 215
 .2
  Portugal75 .1 87 .1 
Italy1,108
 1.0
 1,261
 1.2
  Italy997 1.1 1,090 1.0 
Ireland12
 .0
 29
 .0
  Ireland118 .1 99 .1 
Spain577
 .5
 660
 .6
  Spain598 .6 640 .6 
Nordic Region1,878
 1.7
 1,615
 1.6
 Nordic Region1,670 1.8 1,770 1.6 
Sweden972
 .9
 779
 .7
  Sweden914 1.0 905 .8 
Norway383
 .3
 378
 .4
  Norway322 .3 366 .3 
Denmark333
 .3
 270
 .3
  Denmark276 .3 317 .3 
Finland190
 .2
 188
 .2
  Finland158 .2 182 .2 
Other Europe2,699
 2.5
 2,425
 2.3
 Other Europe2,519 2.8 2,728 2.6 
Netherlands1,276
 1.2
 1,206
 1.1
  Netherlands1,125 1.3 1,259 1.2 
Switzerland417
 .4
 258
 .2
  Switzerland578 .6 532 .5 
Czech Republic484
 .4
 451
 .5
  Czech Republic399 .4 461 .4 
Austria127
 .1
 125
 .1
  Austria106 .1 122 .1 
Belgium189
 .2
 178
 .2
  Belgium160 .2 180 .2 
Poland183
 .2
 180
 .2
  Poland151 .2 174 .2 
Luxembourg23
 .0
 27
 .0
 
Asia excluding Japan2,671
 2.5
 2,722
 2.5
 Asia excluding Japan1,895 2.0 2,198 2.0 
Africa and Middle East1,801
 1.6
 2,018
 1.9
 Africa and Middle East1,002 1.1 1,134 1.1 
Latin America2,183
 2.0
 2,153
 2.0
 Latin America1,935 2.0 2,056 1.9 
Australia1,774
 1.6
 1,620
 1.5
 Australia1,417 1.5 1,578 1.5 
All Others248
 .2
 352
 .3
 All Others261 .3 292 .3 
Total fixed maturity securities$109,456
 100.0% $107,174
 100.0%  Total fixed maturity securities$94,531 100.0 %$107,377 100.0 %
(1) Includes total exposure to Puerto Rico of $1 million of deposits at both December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, of which 100% had principal and interest insurance at both December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
The primary factor considered when determining the domicile of investment exposure is the legal country risk location of the issuer. However, other factors such as the location of the parent guarantor, the location of the company's headquarters or major business operations (including location of major assets), location of primary market (including location of revenue generation) and specific country risk publicly recognized by rating agencies can influence the assignment of the country (or geographic) risk location. When the issuer is a special financing vehicle or a branch or subsidiary of a global company, then the Company considers any guarantees and/or legal, regulatory and corporate relationships of the issuer relative to its ultimate parent in determining the proper assignment of country risk.


75


76

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Derivative Counterparties

The Company is a direct counterparty to the majority of derivative instruments and is exposed to credit risk in the event of nonperformance by the counterparties in those contracts. For the foreign currency swaps associated with the Company's VIE investments for which it is the primary beneficiary, the Company bears the risk of foreign exchange and/or credit loss due to counterparty default even though it is not a direct counterparty to those contracts. The risk of counterparty default for the Company's VIE and senior note and subordinated debenture swaps, foreign currency swaps, certain foreign currency forwards, foreign currency options and interest rate swaptions is mitigated by collateral posting requirements that counterparties to those transactions must meet. If collateral posting agreements are not in place, the counterparty risk associated with foreign currency forwards and foreign currency options is the risk that at expiry of the contract, the counterparty is unable to deliver the agreed upon amount of yen at the agreed upon price or delivery date, thus exposing the Company to additional unhedged exposure to U.S. dollars in the Aflac Japan investment portfolio. See Note 4 of the accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information.

Equity Risk

Market prices for equity securities are subject to fluctuation and consequently the amount realized in the subsequent sale of an investment may significantly differ from the reported market value. Fluctuation in the market price of a security may result from the relative price of alternative investments and general market conditions. The Company’s largest equity exposure as of December 31, 2022 is the investment in Trupanion, Inc., which has a cost basis of $200 million and a fair value of $173 million. Excluding Trupanion Inc., the Company's three largest equity exposures had a fair value of $240 million or approximately 24% of its total investment in equity securities as of December 31, 2022. If equity prices experienced a hypothetical broad-based decline of 10%, the fair value of the Company's equity investments would decline by approximately $80$109 million.


76


77



ITEM 8.    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Management's Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Under the supervision and with the participation of the Company's management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, the Company conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in 2013.. Based on the Company's evaluation under this framework, management has concluded that the Company's internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2019.2022.
KPMG LLP (PCAOB Firm ID 185), an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report from the firm's location in Atlanta, Georgia on the effectiveness of internal control over the Company's financial reporting as of December 31, 2019,2022, which is included herein.

77

78



Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors
Aflac Incorporated:

Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
We have audited Aflac Incorporated and subsidiaries’ (the Company) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019,2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in 2013.. In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019,2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in 2013..
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 20192022 and 2018,2021, the related consolidated statements of earnings, comprehensive income (loss), shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2019,2022, and the related notes and financial statement schedules II, III, and IV (collectively, the consolidated financial statements), and our report dated February 21, 202023, 2023 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management's Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
February 21, 202023, 2023


7879




Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors
Aflac Incorporated:

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Aflac Incorporated and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 20192022 and 2018,2021, the related consolidated statements of earnings, comprehensive income (loss), shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three‑year period ended December 31, 2019,2022, and the related notes and financial statement schedules II, III, and IV (collectively, the consolidated financial statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 20192022 and 2018,2021, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three‑year period ended December 31, 2019,2022, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019,2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in 2013,, and our report dated February 21, 202023, 2023 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Basis for Opinion
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

79



Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
Assessment of the measurement of fairFair value of certain investments and derivativesprivately issued securities
As discussed in Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company hasinvests in certain privately issued securities and derivative instruments associated with variable interest entities (VIEs) that require significant judgment in the estimation of fair value. The fair value of privately issued securities are estimated using discounted cash flow valuation models, developed by a third partythird-party pricing vendor, and require judgmenttake into consideration unique characteristics of the securities and other market information to determine an issuer-specific credit curve to estimate expected cash flows. Judgment is required to determine the inputs and assumptions used in the valuation models, such as credit default swap (CDS) spreads andincluding the selectiondetermination of the most appropriate comparable securities to develop an issuer-specific credit curve when appropriate. The fair value ofit cannot be developed from the Company’s derivatives associated with VIEs are also estimated using valuation models developed by a third party pricing vendor. Given the long duration of derivatives associated with VIEs, the estimate of the fair value requires judgment to extrapolate short-term observable data into long-term inputs for use in the valuation models.specific security features. As of December 31, 2019,2022, the value of privately issued securities are included within the financial statement captions of fixed maturity securities available for sale, at fair value;value of $71,936 million; fixed maturity securities available for sale - consolidated variable


80

interest entities, at fair value;value of $3,805 million; and, fixed maturity securities held to maturity, at amortized cost which totaled $86,950 million, $4,312 million, and $30,085 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2019, the fair value of derivatives associated with VIEs are included within the financial statement captions of other assets and other liabilities, which totaled $2,368 million and $3,440 million, respectively.$19,056 million.
We identified the assessment of the measurement of fair value of certain privately issued securities and derivative instruments associated with VIEs as a critical audit matter. Due to the complexity of the valuation models, subjective auditor judgment and specialized valuation skills and knowledge and subjective auditor judgment were needed to evaluate the valuation models, and the inputs and assumptionsmethodology used in the models to estimate fair value.value and the Company's determination of the most appropriate comparable securities to develop an issuer-specific credit curve, when necessary.
The following are the primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter includedmatter. We evaluated the following. Wedesign and tested the operating effectiveness of certain internal controls, with the involvementassistance of valuation professionals, when appropriate, over the Company’s process to estimate the fair value of such securities and derivative instruments, includingcertain privately issued securities. This included controls over the Company’s evaluationdetermination of comparable securities, when appropriate, to develop an issuer- specific credit curve to be used in the inputs, assumptions and estimates ofvaluation models to estimate fair value obtained from its third party pricing vendor.value. We involved valuation professionals with specialized skills and knowledge to assist in assessing the estimated fair values of such securities, which included
Evaluating the Company's valuation methodology for compliance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Assessing the Company's model developed by a third party to estimate the fair value of privately issued securities by determining that differences in fair value between that model and derivative instruments, which included:
Evaluating the inputs and assumptions used in the models to estimate the fair value of the privately issued securities, including an assessment of the determination of comparable securities and/or CDS spreads used by the third party pricing vendor for a selection of privately issued securities.
Assessing the internal models used by the Company to evaluate the fair values for privately issued securities and derivatives associated with VIEs obtained from the third party pricing vendor. We observed that differences, if any, in fair value between the Company and the third party pricing vendor above pre-established tolerances were investigated by the Company.
Developing an independent estimate of the fair value for a selection of privately issued securities and derivative instruments associated with VIEs and comparing our independent estimate to the fair value measurement recorded by the Company.
the internally developed model above pre-established tolerances, if any, were investigated by the Company.

80



Assessmentour knowledge of the securities and the markets for such securities.
Developing an independent estimate of fair value for a selection of privately issued securities based on independently developed valuation models and assumptions, as applicable, using market data sources and comparing our independent estimate to the Company's fair value.
Estimate of unpaid policy claims
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, unpaid policy claims are estimates computed primarily on an undiscounted basis using statistical analyses of historical claims experience adjusted for current trends and changed conditions. The estimates are evaluated by the Company and, as new claim experience emerges, the estimates are adjusted as necessary. As of December 31, 2019,2022, the Company recorded a liability for unpaid policy claims of $4,659$4,561 million.
We identified the assessment of the estimate of unpaid policy claims as a critical audit matter. Specialized actuarial skills and knowledge and subjective auditor judgment were needed to evaluate the actuarial methodologies and assumptions used to estimate the unpaid policy claims liability and determine that the Company’s methodologies are consistent with generally accepted actuarial methodologies.
The following are the primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter includedmatter. We evaluated the following. Wedesign and tested the operating effectiveness, with the involvementassistance of actuarial professionals, when appropriate,of certain internal controls over the Company’s process to estimate the unpaid policy claims liability, includingliability. This included controls related to the evaluation of the actuarial methodologies and assumptions used in the calculation of the unpaid policy claims liability. We involved actuarial professionals with specialized skills and knowledge to assist in assessing the unpaid policy claims liability, which included:included
Assessing the actuarial methodologies and assumptions utilized by the Company by comparing them to generally accepted actuarial methodologies and historical results.
Evaluating the Company’s estimate of the unpaid policy claims liability by comparing to historical results and our expectations of changes in the estimate.
Developing an independent range for the estimate of unpaid policy claims for certain products to evaluate the Company’s recorded liability and assessing any movement of the recorded liability within our range.


81

Evaluating the Company’s historical ability to estimate unpaid policy claims by comparing the unpaid policy claims liability for certain products recorded by the Company at various historical periods to an independent range developed using claims paid through December 31, 2022.
Disclosure of the expected impact from the adoption of ASU 2018-12 Financial Services - Insurance: Targeted Improvement to the Accounting for Long-Duration Contracts
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company disclosed the expected transition impact and the adjusted liability for future policy benefits (LFPB) balance as of December 31, 2021 and 2022 as a result of ASU 2018-12 Financial Services – Insurance: Targeted Improvement to the Accounting for Long-Duration Contracts (the standard). The Company plans to adopt the standard on January 1, 2023 using the modified retrospective transition method. The standard requires the Company to estimate the LFPB balance using current cash flow assumptions and a discount rate that is the current upper-medium grade (low credit risk) fixed-income instrument yield (current discount rate). The difference in the LFPB balance using the discount rate used immediately before January 1, 2021 (the transition date) and the current discount rate as of the transition date is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) net of tax at transition. All payments under an insurance contract will be measured together as an integrated reserve. The Company estimates the transition date impact from the adoption will result in a decrease in AOCI of approximately $18.6 billion and has disclosed adjusted LFPB balances of $115,964 million and $88,241 million as of December 31, 2021 and 2022, respectively.
We identified the assessment of the disclosure of the Company’s expected impacts of adoption of the standard on the adjusted LFPB balance at transition and as of December 31, 2021 and 2022 using updated assumptions and a current discount rate (collectively, the LFPB balances) as a critical audit matter. A high level of auditor effort, including specialized skills and knowledge, and subjective auditor judgment was involved in the evaluation of actuarial methodologies, certain cash flow assumptions (mortality, morbidity, and terminations) and projections, and the methodology and assumptions used to develop separate U.S. and Japan discount rate curves.
The following are the primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter. We evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of certain internal controls, with the assistance of valuation and actuarial professionals, over the Company’s process to estimate the LFPB balances, including controls related to the actuarial methodologies, cash flow assumptions and projections, and the development of the discount rate curves. We involved valuation professionals with specialized skills and knowledge to assist in assessing the methodology and assumptions used by the Company to develop separate discount rate curves for the U.S. and Japan by developing independent discount rate curves and comparing them to those used by the Company. We involved actuarial professionals with specialized skills and knowledge to assist in assessing the LFPB balances, which included
Evaluating the Company’s estimate of the LFPB balances for compliance with the standard.
Assessing the actuarial methodologies used by the Company to estimate the LFPB balances by evaluating the Company’s calculation of the LFPB balances for compliance with generally accepted actuarial methodologies.
Assessing the reasonableness of certain cash flow assumptions by comparing them to the Company’s historical experience.
Testing the Company’s estimate of the LFPB balances by recalculating the projected cash flows for a selection of policies and comparing the results to the Company’s estimates.

Assessing the actuarial methodologies and assumptions utilized by the Company by comparing them to generally accepted actuarial methodologies and historical results.
Evaluating the Company’s estimate of the unpaid policy claims liability by comparing to historical results and our expectations of changes in the estimate.
Developing an independent range for the estimate of unpaid policy claims for certain products to evaluate the Company’s recorded liability and assessing any movement of the recorded liability within our range.
Evaluating the Company’s historical ability to estimate unpaid policy claims by comparing the unpaid policy claims liability for certain products recorded by the Company at various historical periods to an independent range developed using claims paid through December 31, 2019.



/s/ KPMG LLP

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 1963.
Atlanta, Georgia
February 21, 202023, 2023



8182



Aflac Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Earnings
Years Ended December 31,
 
(In millions, except for share and per-share amounts)2019 2018 2017
Revenues:           
Net premiums, principally supplemental health insurance $18,780
   $18,677
   $18,531
 
Net investment income 3,578
   3,442
   3,220
 
Realized investment gains (losses):           
Other-than-temporary impairment losses realized and loan loss reserves (31)   (81)   (37) 
Other gains (losses) (104)   (349)   (114) 
Total realized investment gains (losses) (135)   (430)   (151) 
Other income (loss) 84
   69
   67
 
Total revenues 22,307
   21,758
   21,667
 
Benefits and expenses:           
Benefits and claims, net 11,942
   12,000
   12,181
 
Acquisition and operating expenses:           
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs 1,282
   1,245
   1,132
 
Insurance commissions 1,321
   1,320
   1,316
 
Insurance and other expenses (1)
 3,089
   2,988
   2,780
 
Interest expense 228
   222
   240
 
Total acquisition and operating expenses 5,920
   5,775
   5,468
 
Total benefits and expenses 17,862
   17,775
   17,649
 
Earnings before income taxes 4,445
   3,983
   4,018
 
Income tax expense:           
Current 806
   1,379
   631
 
Deferred 335
   (316)   (1,217) 
Income taxes 1,141
   1,063
   (586) 
Net earnings $3,304
   $2,920
   $4,604
 
Net earnings per share:           
Basic $4.45
   $3.79
   $5.81
 
Diluted 4.43
   3.77
   5.77
 
Weighted-average outstanding common shares used in
computing earnings per share (In thousands):
           
Basic 742,414
   769,588
   792,042
 
Diluted 746,430
   774,650
   797,861
 

(In millions, except for share and per-share amounts)202220212020
Revenues:
Net earned premiums, principally supplemental health insurance$15,263 $17,647 $18,622 
Net investment income3,656 3,818 3,638 
Net investment gains (losses)363 468 (270)
Other income (loss)220 173 157 
Total revenues19,502 22,106 22,147 
Benefits and expenses:
Benefits and claims, net9,153 10,576 11,796 
Acquisition and operating expenses:
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs1,152 1,170 1,214 
Insurance commissions1,117 1,256 1,316 
Insurance and other expenses (1)
3,250 3,544 3,420 
Interest expense226 238 242 
Total acquisition and operating expenses5,745 6,208 6,192 
Total benefits and expenses14,898 16,784 17,988 
Earnings before income taxes4,604 5,322 4,159 
Income tax expense (benefit):
Current1,181 1,095 794 
Deferred(778)(98)(1,413)
Income taxes403 997 (619)
Net earnings$4,201 $4,325 $4,778 
Net earnings per share:
Basic$6.62 $6.42 $6.69 
Diluted6.59 6.39 6.67 
Weighted-average outstanding common shares used in
  computing earnings per share (In thousands):
Basic634,816 673,617 713,702 
Diluted637,655 676,729 716,192 
Cash dividends per share$1.60 $1.32 $1.12 
(1) Includes expense of $13$48 in 20172021 and $15 in 2020 for the early extinguishment of debtdebt.
See the accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.


82


83


Aflac Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Years Ended December 31,
 
(In millions)2019 2018 2017
Net earnings $3,304
   $2,920
   $4,604
 
Other comprehensive income (loss) before income taxes:           
Unrealized foreign currency translation gains (losses) during
period
 252
   232
   286
 
Unrealized gains (losses) on fixed maturity securities:           
Unrealized holding gains (losses) on fixed maturity securities
during period
 5,870
   (3,155)   1,731
 
Reclassification adjustment for realized (gains) losses on
fixed maturity securities included in net earnings
 (18)   46
   2
 
Unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives during period (12)   2
   1
 
Pension liability adjustment during period (85)   (25)   9
 
Total other comprehensive income (loss) before income taxes 6,007
   (2,900)   2,029
 
Income tax expense (benefit) related to items of other comprehensive
income (loss)
 1,543
   (797)   631
 
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of income taxes 4,464
   (2,103)   1,398
 
Total comprehensive income (loss) $7,768
   $817
   $6,002
 

(In millions)202220212020
Net earnings$4,201 $4,325 $4,778 
Other comprehensive income (loss) before income taxes:
Unrealized foreign currency translation gains (losses) during
   period
(1,080)(889)510 
Unrealized gains (losses) on fixed maturity securities:
Unrealized holding gains (losses) on fixed maturity securities
   during period
(12,603)(929)1,061 
Reclassification adjustment for (gains) losses on
   fixed maturity securities included in net earnings
(453)(31)159 
Unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives during period4 (1)
Pension liability adjustment during period165 148 (7)
Total other comprehensive income (loss) before income taxes(13,967)(1,696)1,722 
Income tax expense (benefit) related to items of other comprehensive
   income (loss)
(2,169)(155)251 
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of income taxes(11,798)(1,541)1,471 
Total comprehensive income (loss)$(7,597)$2,784 $6,249 
See the accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

83

84


Aflac Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
December 31,
 
(In millions, except for share and per-share amounts)2019 2018 
Assets:    
Investments and cash:    
Fixed maturity securities available for sale, at fair value
(amortized cost $76,063 in 2019 and $73,007 in 2018)
$86,950
 $78,429
 
Fixed maturity securities available for sale - consolidated variable interest entities, at fair value
(amortized cost $3,308 in 2019 and $3,849 in 2018)
4,312
 4,466
 
Fixed maturity securities held to maturity, at amortized cost
(fair value $37,594 in 2019 and $36,722 in 2018)
30,085
 30,318
 
Equity securities, at fair value802
 987
 
Commercial mortgage and other loans
(includes $7,956 in 2019 and $5,528 in 2018 of consolidated variable interest entities)
9,569
 6,919
 
Other investments
(includes $494 in 2019 and $328 in 2018 of consolidated variable interest entities)
1,477
 787
 
Cash and cash equivalents4,896
 4,337
 
Total investments and cash138,091
 126,243
 
Receivables828
 851
 
Accrued investment income772
 773
 
Deferred policy acquisition costs10,128
 9,875
 
Property and equipment, at cost less accumulated depreciation (1)
581
 443
 
Other2,368
 2,221
 
Total assets$152,768
 $140,406
 
Liabilities and shareholders’ equity:    
Liabilities:    
Policy liabilities:    
Future policy benefits$90,335
 $86,368
 
Unpaid policy claims4,659
 4,584
 
Unearned premiums4,243
 5,090
 
Other policyholders’ funds7,317
 7,146
 
Total policy liabilities106,554
 103,188
 
Income taxes5,370
 4,020
 
Payables for return of cash collateral on loaned securities1,876
 1,052
 
Notes payable and lease obligations (1)
6,569
 5,778
 
Other3,440
 2,906
 
Total liabilities123,809
 116,944
 
Commitments and contingent liabilities (Note 15)

 

 
Shareholders’ equity:    
Common stock of $.10 par value. In thousands: authorized 1,900,000
shares in 2019 and 2018; issued 1,349,309 shares in 2019 and 1,347,540
shares in 2018
135
 135
 
Additional paid-in capital2,313
 2,177
 
Retained earnings34,291
 31,788
 
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss):    
Unrealized foreign currency translation gains (losses)(1,623) (1,847) 
Unrealized gains (losses) on fixed maturity securities8,548
 4,234
 
Unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives(33) (24) 
Pension liability adjustment(277) (212) 
Treasury stock, at average cost(14,395) (12,789) 
Total shareholders’ equity28,959
 23,462
 
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity$152,768
 $140,406
 

(1) See Note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the adoption of accounting guidance on January 1, 2019 related to leases.
(In millions, except for share and per-share amounts)20222021
Assets:
Investments and cash:
Fixed maturity securities available for sale, at fair value, (no allowance for credit losses in
  2022 and 2021, amortized cost $72,246 in 2022 and $82,105 in 2021)
$71,936 $94,206 
Fixed maturity securities available for sale - consolidated variable interest entities, at fair value
  (amortized cost $3,223 in 2022 and $3,264 in 2021)
3,805 4,490 
Fixed maturity securities held to maturity, at amortized cost, net of allowance
  for credit losses of $7 in 2022 and $8 in 2021 (fair value $21,210 in 2022 and $26,869 in 2021)
19,056 22,000 
Equity securities, at fair value1,091 1,603 
Commercial mortgage and other loans, net of allowance for credit losses of $192 in 2022 and $174
  in 2021 (includes $10,832 in 2022 and $9,740 in 2021 of consolidated variable interest entities)
13,496 11,786 
Other investments
  (includes $1,909 in 2022 and $1,535 in 2021 of consolidated variable interest entities)
4,070 3,842 
Cash and cash equivalents3,943 5,051 
Total investments and cash117,397 142,978 
Receivables647 672 
Accrued investment income745 737 
Deferred policy acquisition costs8,593 9,525 
Property and equipment, at cost less accumulated depreciation530 538 
Other3,105 3,092 
Total assets$131,017 $157,542 
Liabilities and shareholders’ equity:
Liabilities:
Policy liabilities:
Future policy benefits$80,749 $90,588 
Unpaid policy claims4,561 4,836 
Unearned premiums1,825 2,576 
Other policyholders’ funds6,123 7,072 
Total policy liabilities93,258 105,072 
Income taxes1,296 4,339 
Payables for return of cash collateral on loaned securities1,809 2,162 
Notes payable and lease obligations7,442 7,956 
Other4,847 4,760 
Total liabilities108,652 124,289 
Commitments and contingent liabilities (Note 15)
Shareholders’ equity:
Common stock of $.10 par value. In thousands: authorized 1,900,000
  shares in 2022 and 2021; issued 1,354,079 shares in 2022 and 1,352,739 shares in 2021
135 135 
Additional paid-in capital2,641 2,529 
Retained earnings44,568 41,381 
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss):
Unrealized foreign currency translation gains (losses)(3,640)(2,013)
Unrealized gains (losses) on fixed maturity securities(702)9,602 
Unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives(27)(30)
Pension liability adjustment(36)(166)
Treasury stock, at average cost(20,574)(18,185)
Total shareholders’ equity22,365 33,253 
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity$131,017 $157,542 
See the accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.


84


85


Aflac Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity

(In millions, except for per share amounts)Common StockAdditional Paid-in CapitalRetained EarningsAccumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)Treasury StockTotal
Shareholders'
Equity
Balance at December 31, 2016$135
$1,908
$25,981
$2,630
$(10,172)$20,482
Net earnings0
0
4,604
0
0
4,604
Unrealized foreign currency translation
gains (losses) during period, net of
income tax
0
0
0
233
0
233
Unrealized gains (losses) on fixed maturity
securities during period, net of income
taxes and reclassification adjustments
0
0
0
1,159
0
1,159
Unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives
during period, net of income taxes
0
0
0
1
0
1
Pension liability adjustment during period,
net of income taxes
0
0
0
5
0
5
Dividends to shareholders
($.87 per share)
0
0
(690)0
0
(690)
Exercise of stock options0
38
0
0
0
38
Share-based compensation0
51
0
0
0
51
Purchases of treasury stock0
0
0
0
(1,391)(1,391)
Treasury stock reissued0
55
0
0
51
106
Balance at December 31, 2017135
2,052
29,895
4,028
(11,512)24,598
Cumulative effect of change in accounting
  principles, net of income tax (1)
0
0
(226)226
0
0
Net earnings0
0
2,920
0
0
2,920
Unrealized foreign currency translation
gains (losses) during period, net of
income tax
0
0
0
228
0
228
Unrealized gains (losses) on fixed maturity
securities during period, net of income
taxes and reclassification adjustments
0
0
0
(2,316)0
(2,316)
Unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives
during period, net of income taxes
0
0
0
2
0
2
Pension liability adjustment during period,
net of income taxes
0
0
0
(17)0
(17)
Dividends to shareholders
($1.04 per share)
0
0
(801)0
0
(801)
Exercise of stock options0
34
0
0
0
34
Share-based compensation0
54
0
0
0
54
Purchases of treasury stock0
0
0
0
(1,317)(1,317)
Treasury stock reissued0
37
0
0
40
77
Balance at December 31, 2018135
2,177
31,788
2,151
(12,789)23,462
Net earnings0
0
3,304
0
0
3,304
Unrealized foreign currency translation
gains (losses) during period, net of
income tax
0
0
0
224
0
224
Unrealized gains (losses) on fixed maturity
securities during period, net of income
taxes and reclassification adjustments
0
0
0
4,314
0
4,314
Unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives
during period, net of income taxes
0
0
0
(9)0
(9)
Pension liability adjustment during period,
net of income taxes
0
0
0
(65)0
(65)
Dividends to shareholders
($1.08 per share)
0
0
(801)0
0
(801)
Exercise of stock options0
29
0
0
0
29
Share-based compensation0
54
0
0
0
54
Purchases of treasury stock0
0
0
0
(1,656)(1,656)
Treasury stock reissued0
53
0
0
50
103
Balance at December 31, 2019$135
$2,313
$34,291
$6,615
$(14,395)$28,959
(In millions, except for per share amounts)Common StockAdditional Paid-in CapitalRetained EarningsAccumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)Treasury StockTotal
Shareholders'
Equity
Balance at December 31, 2019$135 $2,313 $34,291 $6,615 $(14,395)$28,959 
Cumulative effect of change in accounting
  principle - Accounting Standards
  Update (ASU) 2016-13, net of income taxes (1)
(56)(56)
Cumulative effect of change in accounting
  principle - ASU 2019-04, net of income taxes (1)
848 848 
Balance at January 1, 2020135 2,313 34,235 7,463 (14,395)29,751 
Net earnings4,778 4,778 
Unrealized foreign currency translation
  gains (losses) during period, net of
  income taxes
514 514 
Unrealized gains (losses) on fixed maturity
   securities during period, net of income
   taxes and reclassification adjustments
965 965 
Unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives
   during period, net of income taxes
(1)(1)
Pension liability adjustment during period,
   net of income taxes
(7)(7)
Dividends to shareholders (2)
  ($1.45 per share)
(1,029)(1,029)
Exercise of stock options12 12 
Share-based compensation53 53 
Purchases of treasury stock(1,565)(1,565)
Treasury stock reissued32 56 88 
Balance at December 31, 2020135 2,410 37,984 8,934 (15,904)33,559 
Net earnings4,325 4,325 
Unrealized foreign currency translation
  gains (losses) during period, net of
  income taxes
(904)(904)
Unrealized gains (losses) on fixed maturity
   securities during period, net of income
   taxes and reclassification adjustments
(759)(759)
Unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives
   during period, net of income taxes
Pension liability adjustment during period,
   net of income taxes
118 118 
Dividends to shareholders (2)
  ($1.39 per share)
(928)(928)
Exercise of stock options18 18 
Share-based compensation61 61 
Purchases of treasury stock(2,322)(2,322)
Treasury stock reissued40 41 81 
Balance at December 31, 2021$135 $2,529 $41,381 $7,393 $(18,185)$33,253 
(1) See Note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the adoption of accounting guidance on January 1, 2018.2020.
(2) Dividends to shareholders are recorded in the period in which they are declared.
See the accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

(continued)

85


86


Aflac Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity (continued)

(In millions, except for per share amounts)Common StockAdditional Paid-in CapitalRetained EarningsAccumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)Treasury StockTotal
Shareholders'
Equity
Balance at December 31, 2021$135 $2,529 $41,381 $7,393 $(18,185)$33,253 
Net earnings4,201 4,201 
Unrealized foreign currency translation
  gains (losses) during period, net of
  income taxes
(1,627)(1,627)
Unrealized gains (losses) on fixed maturity
   securities during period, net of income
   taxes and reclassification adjustments
(10,304)(10,304)
Unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives
   during period, net of income taxes
Pension liability adjustment during period,
   net of income taxes
130 130 
Dividends to shareholders (1)
  ($1.62 per share)
(1,014)(1,014)
Exercise of stock options12 12 
Share-based compensation62 62 
Purchases of treasury stock(2,425)(2,425)
Treasury stock reissued38 36 74 
Balance at December 31, 2022$135 $2,641 $44,568 $(4,405)$(20,574)$22,365 
(1) Dividends to shareholders are recorded in the period in which they are declared.
See the accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.



87

Aflac Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Years Ended December 31,
(In millions)2019 2018 2017
Cash flows from operating activities:           
Net earnings $3,304
   $2,920
   $4,604
 
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided (used) by operating activities:           
Change in receivables and advance premiums (32)   (55)   (91) 
Capitalization of deferred policy acquisition costs (1,452)   (1,504)   (1,468) 
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs 1,282
   1,245
   1,132
 
Increase in policy liabilities 2,104
   2,343
   2,890
 
Change in income tax liabilities (244)   64
   (1,240) 
Realized investment (gains) losses 135
   430
   151
 
Other, net 358
   571
   150
 
Net cash provided (used) by operating activities 5,455
   6,014
   6,128
 
Cash flows from investing activities:           
Proceeds from investments sold or matured:           
Available-for-sale fixed maturity securities 5,284
   7,888
   4,680
 
Equity securities 650
   429
   902
 
Held-to-maturity fixed maturity securities 622
   1,670
   2,212
 
Commercial mortgage and other loans 1,814
   936
   303
 
Costs of investments acquired:           
Available-for-sale fixed maturity securities (6,934)   (9,086)   (9,867) 
Equity securities (347)   (440)   (446) 
Commercial mortgage and other loans (4,401)   (4,848)   (2,115) 
Other investments, net (653)   (414)   (206) 
Settlement of derivatives, net (9)   (241)   (621) 
Cash received (pledged or returned) as collateral, net 926
   348
   (205) 
Other, net (123)   176
   (68) 
Net cash provided (used) by investing activities (3,171)   (3,582)   (5,431) 
Cash flows from financing activities:           
Purchases of treasury stock (1,627)   (1,301)   (1,351) 
Proceeds from borrowings 615
   1,020
   1,040
 
Principal payments under debt obligations 0
   (550)   (1,161) 
Dividends paid to shareholders (771)   (793)   (661) 
Change in investment-type contracts, net (1)   (31)   35
 
Treasury stock reissued 49
   58
   33
 
Other, net 22
   (19)   0
 
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities (1,713)   (1,616)   (2,065) 
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents (12)   30
   0
 
Net change in cash and cash equivalents 559
   846
   (1,368) 
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period 4,337
   3,491
   4,859
 
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $4,896
   $4,337
   $3,491
 
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:           
Income taxes paid $1,384
   $998
   $780
 
Interest paid 190
   181
   196
 
Noncash interest 37
   41
   44
 
Impairment losses and loan loss reserves included in realized investment losses 31
   81
   37
 
Noncash financing activities:           
Lease obligations 132
   11
   12
 
Treasury stock issued for:           
   Associate stock bonus 15
   7
   29
 
   Shareholder dividend reinvestment 30
   8
   29
 
   Share-based compensation grants 5
   2
   1
 

(In millions)202220212020
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net earnings$4,201 $4,325 $4,778 
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided (used) by
  operating activities:
Change in receivables and advance premiums2 75 58 
Capitalization of deferred policy acquisition costs(1,054)(1,063)(1,142)
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs1,152 1,170 1,214 
Increase in policy liabilities661 976 2,023 
Change in income tax liabilities(558)118 (1,419)
Net investment (gains) losses(363)(468)270 
Other, net(162)(82)176 
Net cash provided (used) by operating activities3,879 5,051 5,958 
Cash flows from investing activities:
Proceeds from investments sold or matured:
Available-for-sale fixed maturity securities4,418 4,157 3,725 
Equity securities570 264 234 
Held-to-maturity fixed maturity securities3 
Commercial mortgage and other loans2,190 4,099 2,085 
Costs of investments acquired:
Available-for-sale fixed maturity securities(3,514)(5,813)(4,772)
Equity securities(461)(492)(498)
Commercial mortgage and other loans(3,897)(5,282)(3,263)
Other investments, net(227)(1,066)(860)
Settlement of derivatives, net(61)199 18 
Cash received (pledged or returned) as collateral, net(673)1,511 (1,027)
Other, net112 41 (265)
Net cash provided (used) by investing activities(1,540)(2,378)(4,619)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Purchases of treasury stock(2,401)(2,301)(1,537)
Proceeds from borrowings1,277 1,153 1,545 
Principal payments under debt obligations(1,416)(700)(350)
Dividends paid to shareholders(979)(855)(769)
Change in investment-type contracts, net(83)(36)(11)
Treasury stock reissued17 26 34 
Other, net34 (26)(27)
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities(3,551)(2,739)(1,115)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents104 (24)21 
Net change in cash and cash equivalents(1,108)(90)245 
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period5,051 5,141 4,896 
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period$3,943 $5,051 $5,141 
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Income taxes paid$961 $880 $800 
Interest paid211 213 210 
Noncash interest14 24 32 
Noncash financing activities:
Lease obligations102 46 56 
Treasury stock issued for:
   Associate stock bonus14 19 19 
   Shareholder dividend reinvestment37 32 29 
   Share-based compensation grants6 
See the accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

86

88


Aflac Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Description of Business
Aflac Incorporated (the Parent Company) and its subsidiaries (collectively, the Company) primarily sell supplemental health and life insurance in the United States (U.S.) and Japan. The Company's insurance business is marketed and administered through American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus (Aflac) in the U.S. and effective April 1, 2018, through Aflac Life Insurance Japan Ltd. (ALIJ) in Japan. Prior to April 1, 2018, the Company's insurance business was marketed in Japan as a branch of Aflac. The Company’s operations consist of two reportable business segments: Aflac U.S., which includes Aflac, and Aflac Japan, which includes ALIJ. American Family Life Assurance Company of New York (Aflac New York) is a wholly owned subsidiary of Aflac. Most of Aflac's policies are individually underwritten and marketed through independent agents. Additionally,With the exception of dental and vision products administered by Aflac Benefits Solutions Inc. (ABS), formerly known as Argus Dental & Vision, Inc., and certain group life insurance products, Aflac U.S. markets and administers group products through Continental American Insurance Company (CAIC), branded as Aflac Group Insurance. Additionally, Aflac U.S. markets its consumer markets products through Tier One Insurance Company (TOIC). The Company's insurance operations in the U.S. and Japan service the two markets for the Company's insurance business. Aflac Japan's revenues, including realizednet gains and losses on its investment portfolio, accounted for 69% of the Company's total revenues in 2019,2022, compared with 70%69% in both 20182021 and 2017.68% in 2020. The percentage of the Company's total assets attributable to Aflac Japan was 83%80% at December 31, 2019,2022, compared with 84%82% at December 31, 2018.2021.

In 2022, the Company established Aflac Re Bermuda Ltd. (Aflac Re Bermuda), a Bermuda domiciled insurer that reinsures certain policies issued by ALIJ. Aflac Re Bermuda is subject to regulation in Bermuda, where the Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA) has broad administrative powers relating to granting and revoking licenses to transact reinsurance business, approval of specific reinsurance transactions, capital requirements and solvency standards, limitations on dividends to shareholders, the nature of and limitations on investments, and the filing of financial statements in accordance with prescribed or permitted accounting practices.

In November 2019,2020, the Company, through its insurance subsidiaries Aflac and Aflac New York, acquired Argus Holdings, LLCZurich North America’s U.S. Corporate Life and its subsidiary Argus Dental & Vision, Inc. (Argus)Pensions business (Zurich), a benefitswhich consists of group life, disability and absence management organizationproducts. Aflac and national network dentalAflac New York will reinsure on an indemnity basis Zurich's in-force group life and vision company, which provides a platform fordisability policies. Aflac Dentalalso acquired assets needed to support the group life and Vision. The Company paid $75 million at closing and madedisability business, along with an additional commitment of up to $21 million in contingent consideration payable over three years based on the achievement by Argus of certain performance targets. Argus is an addition to the Aflac U.S. segment.absence management platform.

Basis of Presentation
The Company prepares its financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP). These principles are established primarily by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). In these Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, references to U.S. GAAP issued by the FASB are derived from the FASB Accounting Standards CodificationTM (ASC). The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires the Company to make estimates based on currently available information when recording transactions resulting from business operations. The most significant items on the Company's balance sheet that involve a greater degree of accounting estimates and actuarial determinations subject to changes in the future are the valuation of investments and derivatives, deferred policy acquisition costs (DAC), liabilities for future policy benefits and unpaid policy claims, and income taxes. These accounting estimates and actuarial determinations are sensitive to market conditions, investment yields, mortality, morbidity, commission and other acquisition expenses, and terminations by policyholders. As additional information becomes available, or actual amounts are determinable, the recorded estimates will beare revised and reflected in operating results. Although some variability is inherent in these estimates, the Company believes the amounts provided are adequate.reasonable and reflective of the best estimates of management.

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Parent Company, its subsidiaries, and those entities required to be consolidated under applicable accounting standards. All material intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

Market Conditions: The impact of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) global pandemic on the Company continues to evolve and the continued path of the global economic recovery remains uncertain given the potential longer-term impacts that have resulted from or are coincidental with the pandemic. For example, economic conditions have acted as headwinds to sales and earned premiums in 2022. Further, continued widening of the differential between U.S. and Japan interest rates has contributed to a weakening of the yen, which has the effect of suppressing the Company's current period results in relation to the comparable prior period.


89


Significant Accounting Policies

Foreign Currency Translation: The functional currency of Aflac Japan is the Japanese yen. The Company translates its yen-denominated financial statement accounts into U.S. dollars as follows. Assets and liabilities are translated at end-of-period exchange rates. Realized gains and losses on security transactions are translated at the exchange rate on the trade date of each transaction. Other revenues, expenses, and cash flows are translated using average exchange rates for the period. The resulting currency translation adjustments are reported in accumulated other comprehensive income. The Company includes in earnings the realized currency exchange gains and losses resulting from foreign currency transactions.

The Parent Company has designated a majority of its yen-denominated liabilities (notes payable and yen-denominated loans) as non-derivative hedges and from time-to-time may designate certain foreign currency forwards and options as derivative hedges of the foreign currency exposure of the Company's net investment in Aflac Japan. Outstanding principal and related accrued interest on these Parent Company liabilities and the fair value of these derivatives are translated into U.S. dollars at end-of-period exchange rates. Currency translation adjustments and changes in the fair value of these

87



derivatives are recorded as unrealized foreign currency translation gains (losses) in other comprehensive income and are included in accumulated other comprehensive income.

Insurance Revenue and Expense Recognition: Substantially all of the supplemental health and life insurance policies the Company issues are classified as long-duration contracts. The contract provisions generally cannot be changed or canceled during the contract period; however, the Company may adjust premiums for supplemental health policies issued in the U.S. within prescribed guidelines and with the approval of state insurance regulatory authorities.

Insurance premiums for most of the Company's health and life policies, including cancer, accident, hospital, critical illness, dental, vision, term life, whole life, long-term care and disability, are recognized as revenueearned premiums over the premium-paying periods of the contracts when due from policyholders. When revenuesearned premiums are reported, the related amounts of benefits and expenses are charged against such revenues, so that profits are recognized in proportion to premium revenuesearned premiums during the period the policies are expected to remain in force. This association is accomplished by means of annual additions to the liability for future policy benefits and the deferral and subsequent amortization of policy acquisition costs.

Premiums from the Company's products with limited-pay features, including cancer, medical and nursing care, term life, whole life, WAYS, and child endowment, are collected over a significantly shorter period than the period over which benefits are provided. Premiums for these products are recognized as revenueearned premiums over the premium-paying periods of the contracts when due from policyholders. Any gross premium in excess of the net premium is deferred and recorded in earnings, such that profits are recognized in a constant relationship with insurance in force. Benefits are recorded as an expense when they are incurred. A liability for future policy benefits is recorded when premiums are recognized using the net premium method.

At the policyholder's option, customers can also pay discounted advanced premiums for certain of the Company's products. Advanced premiums are deferred and recognized when due from policyholders over the regularly scheduled premium payment period.

The calculation of DAC and the liability for future policy benefits requires the use of estimates based on sound actuarial valuation techniques. For new policy issues, the Company reviews its actuarial assumptions and deferrable acquisition costs each year and revises them when necessary to more closely reflect recent experience and studies of actual acquisition costs. For policies in force, the Company evaluates DAC by major product groupings to determine that they are recoverable from future revenues, and any amounts determined not to be recoverable are charged against net earnings. The Company has not had any material charges to earnings for DAC that was determined not to be recoverable in any of the years presented in this Form 10-K.

Advertising expense is reported as incurred in insurance and other expenses in the consolidated statements of earnings.

Cash and Cash Equivalents: Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, money market instruments, and other debt instruments with a maturity of 90 days or less when purchased.

Investments: The Company's debt securities consist of fixed maturity securities, which are classified as either held to maturity or available for sale. Securities classified as held to maturity are securities that the Company has the ability and intent to hold to maturity or redemption and are carried at amortized cost.


90


All other fixed maturity debt securities are classified as available for sale and are carried at fair value. If the fair value is higher than the amortized cost for debt securities, the excess is an unrealized gain, and if lower than cost, the difference is an unrealized loss. The net unrealized gains and losses on securities available for sale, less related deferred income taxes, are recorded through other comprehensive income and included in accumulated other comprehensive income.

Amortized cost of debt securities is based on the Company's purchase price adjusted for accrual of discount, or amortization of premium, and recognition of impairment charges, if any. The amortized cost of debt securities the Company purchases at a discount or premium will equal the face or par value at maturity or the call date, if applicable. Interest is reported as income when earned and is adjusted for amortization of any premium or discount.

The Company has investments in marketable equity securities which are carried at fair value. Changes in the fair value of equity securities are recorded in earnings as a component of realizednet investment gains and losses.

The Company has investments in variable interest entities (VIEs). Criteria for evaluating VIEs for consolidation focuses on identifying which enterprise has the power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity that most significantly impact the entity's economic performance and (1) the obligation to absorb losses of the entity or (2) the right to receive benefits from the entity. The Company is the primary beneficiary of certain VIEs, and therefore consolidates these entities in its financial statements. While the consolidated VIEs generally operate within a defined set of contractual terms, there are certain powers

88



that are retained by the Company that are considered significant in the conclusion that the Company is the primary beneficiary. These powers vary by structure but generally include the initial selection of the underlying collateral; the ability to obtain the underlying collateral in the event of default; and, the ability to appoint or dismiss key parties in the structure. In particular, the Company's powers surrounding the underlying collateral were considered to be the most significant powers because thosethese most significantly impact the economics of the VIE. The Company has no obligation to provide any continuing financial support to any of the entities in which it is the primary beneficiary. The Company's maximum loss is limited to its original investment. Neither the Company nor any of its creditors have the ability to obtain the underlying collateral, nor does the Company have control over the instruments held in the VIEs, unless there is an event of default. For those entities where the Company is the primary beneficiary, the consolidated entity's assets are segregated on the balance sheet by the caption "consolidated variable interest entities," and consist of fixed maturity securities, equity securities, loan receivables, limited partnerships and derivative instruments.

For the mortgage- and asset-backed securities held in the Company's fixed maturity portfolio, the Company recognizes income using a constant effective yield, which is based on anticipated prepayments and the estimated economic life of the securities. When estimates of prepayments change, the effective yield is recalculated to reflect actual payments to date and anticipated future payments. The net investment in mortgage- and asset-backed securities is adjusted to the amount that would have existed had the new effective yield been applied at the time of acquisition. This adjustment is reflected in net investment income.

The Company uses the specific identification method to determine the gain or loss from securities transactions and report the realized gain or loss in the consolidated statements of earnings.earnings as net investment gain or loss. Securities transactions are accounted for based on values as of the trade date of the transaction.

An investment in a fixed maturity security is impaired if the fair value falls below amortized cost. The Company regularly reviews its fixed maturity security investments portfolio for declines in fair value. The Company's fixed maturity security investments are evaluated for other-than-temporary impairment using its debt impairment model. The Company's debt impairment model focuses on the ultimate collection of the cash flows from its investments and whether the Company has the intent to sell or if it is more likely than not the Company would be required to sell the security prior to recovery of its amortized cost. The determination of the amount of impairments under this model is based upon the Company's periodic evaluation and assessment of known and inherent risks associated with the respective securities. Such evaluations and assessments are revised as conditions change and new information becomes available.
When determining the Company's intention to sell a security prior to recovery of its fair value to amortized cost, the Company evaluates facts and circumstances such as, but not limited to, future cash flow needs, decisions to reposition its security portfolio, and risk profile of individual investment holdings. The Company performs ongoing analyses of its liquidity needs, which includes cash flow testing of its policy liabilities, debt maturities, projected dividend payments, and other cash flow and liquidity needs.

The determination of whether an impairment in value of the Company's fixed maturity securities is other than temporary is based largely on the Company's evaluation of the issuer's creditworthiness. The Company must apply considerable judgment in determining the likelihood of its fixed maturity securities recovering in value. Factors that may influence this include the overall level of interest rates, credit spreads, the credit quality of the underlying issuer, and other factors. This process requires consideration of risks which can be controlled to a certain extent, such as credit risk, and risks which cannot be controlled, such as interest rate risk and foreign currency risk.

If, after monitoring and analyses, management believes that fair value will not recover to amortized cost, the Company recognizes an other-than-temporary impairment of the security. Once a security is considered to be other-than-temporarily impaired, the impairment loss is separated into two components: the portion of the impairment related to credit and the portion of the impairment related to factors other than credit. The Company recognizes a charge to earnings for the credit-related portion of other-than-temporary impairments. Impairments related to factors other than credit are charged to earnings in the event the Company intends to sell the security prior to the recovery of its amortized cost or if it is more likely than not that the Company would be required to dispose of the security prior to recovery of its amortized cost; otherwise, non-credit-related other-than-temporary impairments are charged to other comprehensive income.

The Company lends fixed maturity and public equity securities to financial institutions in short-term security-lending transactions. These securities continue to be carried as investment assets on the Company's balance sheet during the terms of the loans and are not reported as sales. The Company receives cash or other securities as collateral for such loans. For loans involving unrestricted cash or securities as collateral, the collateral is reported as an asset with a corresponding liability for the return of the collateral. For loans where the Company receives as collateral securities that the Company is not permitted to sell or repledge, the collateral is not reported as an asset.

89




Commercial mortgage and other loans include transitional real estate loans (TREs), commercial mortgage loans (CMLs) and middle market loans (MMLs). The Company's investments in TREs, CMLs, and MMLs are accounted for as loan receivables and are recorded at amortized cost on the acquisition date. The Company has the intent and ability to hold these loan receivables for the foreseeable future or until they mature and therefore, they are considered held for investment and are carried at amortized cost in the commercial mortgage and other loans line in its consolidated balance sheets. The amortized cost of the loan receivables reflects allowances for expected incurredlifetime credit losses estimated based on past events and current economic conditions as of each reporting date.

Other investments include policy loans, limited partnerships, and short-term investments with maturities at the time of purchase of one year or less, but greater than 90 days. Limited partnerships are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. Under the equity method of accounting, the Company reports its portionproportionate share of partnership the investee's


91

earnings or losses as a component of net investment income in its consolidated statements of earnings. The underlying investments held by the Company’s limited partnerships primarily consist of private equity and real estate. Short-term investments are stated at amortized cost, which approximates fair value.

Credit Losses: The Company estimates expected lifetime credit losses on financial assets measured at amortized cost including short-term receivables, premiums receivable, held-to-maturity fixed maturity securities, loan receivables, loan commitments and reinsurance recoverables. For available-for-sale fixed maturity securities, the Company evaluates estimated credit losses only when the fair value of the available-for-sale fixed maturity security is below its amortized cost basis. Credit loss changes are recorded as a component of net investment gains and losses for the Company’s held-to-maturity and available-for-sale securities, loan receivables, loan commitments and reinsurance recoverables, whereas credit losses on premium receivables are recorded in net earned premiums in the consolidated statement of earnings. The Company’s off-balance sheet credit exposure is primarily attributable to loan commitments that are not unconditionally cancellable. The Company considers the contractual period of exposure to credit risk, the likelihood that funding will occur, the risk of loss, and the current conditions and expectations of future economic conditions to develop the estimate of expected credit losses. The Company records the estimate of expected credit losses for certain loan commitments within other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet.

Write-offs and partial write-offs are recorded as a reduction to the amortized cost of the loan or fixed maturity security balance and a corresponding reduction to the credit allowance.

The Company has elected not to measure an allowance on accrued interest income for all asset types, because the uncollectible accrued interest receivable is written off in a timely manner. The Company writes off accrued interest when it is more than ninety days past due by reducing interest income, which is a component of net investment income, in the consolidated statement of earnings.

The Company records due premium receivable net of current expected credit losses in the receivables line item in the consolidated balance sheet, utilizing an aging methodology based on historical loss information, adjusted for current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Changes in the estimated credit losses related to premium receivable are recorded in net earned premiums in the consolidated statement of earnings.

Derivatives and Hedging:Freestanding derivative instruments are reported in the consolidated balance sheet at fair value and are reported inwithin other assets and other liabilities, with changes in value reported in earnings and/or other comprehensive income. These freestanding derivatives are foreign currency forwards, foreign currency options, foreign currency swaps, interest rate swaps and interest rate swaptions, and, in prior year periods, credit default swaps (CDSs).swaptions. The Company does not use derivatives for trading purposes, nor does the Company engage in leveraged derivative transactions.

From time to time, the Company purchases certain investments that contain an embedded derivative. The Company assesses whether this embedded derivative is clearly and closely related to the asset that serves as its host contract. If the Company deems that the embedded derivative's terms are not clearly and closely related to the host contract, and a separate instrument with the same terms would qualify as a derivative instrument, the derivative is separated from that contract, held at fair value, and reported with the host instrument in the consolidated balance sheet, with changes in fair value reported in earnings. If the Company has elected the fair value option, the embedded derivative is not bifurcated, and the entire investment is held at fair value with changes in fair value reported in earnings.
See Note 5 for a discussion on how the Company determines the fair value of its derivatives. Accruals on derivatives are typically recorded in other assets or within other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets.

To qualify for hedge accounting treatment, a derivative must be highly effective in mitigating the designated risk attributable to the hedged item. At the inception of hedging relationships the Company formally documents all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as its risk-management objectives and strategies for undertaking the respective hedging relationship, and the methodology that will be used to assess the effectiveness of the hedge relationship at and subsequent to hedge inception. The Company documents the designation of each hedge as either (i) a hedge of the variability of cash flows to be received or paid related to a recognized asset or liability or the hedge of a forecasted transaction ("cash flow hedge"); (ii) a hedge of the estimatedexposure to changes in the fair value of a recognized asset or liability, attributable to a particular risk ("fair value hedge"); or (iii) a hedge of foreign currency exposure of a net investment in a foreign operation.operation ("net investment hedge"). The documentation process includes linking derivatives and non-derivative financial instruments that are designated as hedges toin hedge relationships with specific assets or groups of assets or liabilities in the statement of financial position or to specific forecasted transactions and defining the effectiveness testing methods to be used. At the hedge inception and on an ongoing quarterly basis, the Company also formally assesses whether the derivatives and non-derivative financial instruments used in hedging activities have been,


92

and are expected to continue to be, highly effective in offsetting their designated risk. Hedge effectiveness is assessed using qualitative and quantitative methods. The assessment of hedge effectiveness determines the accounting treatment of changes in fair value.
For assessing hedgeHedge effectiveness is assessed using qualitative and quantitative methods. Qualitative methods may include the comparison of critical terms of the derivative to the hedged item, and quantitative methods may include regression, dollar offset, or other statistical analysis of changes in fair value or cash flows associated with the hedge relationship.
For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges, the gain or loss on the derivativeportion of the hedging instrument included in the assessment of effectiveness is reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. In cash flow hedges,Amounts reclassified are recorded in the line item of the consolidated statements of earnings in which gain or loss on the hedged item is recorded. The Company includes all components of each derivative's gain or loss are included in the assessment of hedge effectiveness.
For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as fair value hedges, the gain or loss on the hedged item and the portion of the hedging instrument included in the assessment of effectiveness are recorded in the line item of the consolidated statements of earnings in which gain or loss on the hedged item is recorded. When assessing the effectiveness

90



of the Company's fair value hedges, the Company excludes the changes in fair value related to the difference between the spot and the forward rate on its foreign currency forwards, the fair value not resulting from fluctuations in spot currency rates on the final notional exchange on cross currency swaps, and the time value of money of foreign exchange options and interest rate swaptions. For interest rate swaptions and cross-currency interest rate swaps designated under fair value hedges of interest rate risk, the change in the time value of money is recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) and amortized into earnings (net investment income) over its legal term.
As discussed in Note 4, from time to time the Company designates net investment hedges of its net investment in Aflac Japan. The Company makes its net investment hedge designation at the beginning of each quarter. The qualifying hedging instruments are non-derivative instruments that are not reported at fair value that represent yen-denominated liabilities, namely yen-denominated debt issued by the Company and foreign currency derivatives that include foreign currency forwards and options. For derivative and non-derivative hedging instruments designated as net investment hedges, Aflacthe Company follows the spot-rate method. According to that method, the change in fair value of the hedging instrument due to fluctuations in the spot exchange rate is recorded in the unrealized foreign currency component of other comprehensive income and reclassified to earnings only when the hedged net investment is sold, or when a liquidation of the respective net investment in the foreign entity is substantially completed. If and when a sale or liquidation occurs, the changes in fair value of the derivative deferred in the unrealized foreign currency component of other comprehensive income will be released in the same income statement line item where the gain (loss) on the hedged net investment would be recorded upon sale. All other changes in fair value of the hedging instrument are considered the “excluded component” and are accounted for in realizednet investment gains (losses). Should these designated net investment hedge positions exceed the Company's net investment in Aflac Japan, the foreign exchange effect on the portion that exceeds its investment in Aflac Japan would be recognized in current earnings within realizednet investment gains (losses).
The Company discontinues hedge accounting prospectively when (1) it is determined that the derivative is no longer highly effective in offsetting changes in the estimated cash flows or fair value of a hedged item; (2) the derivative is de-designated as a hedging instrument; or (3) the derivative expires or is sold, terminated or exercised.
When hedge accounting is discontinued on a cash flow hedge or fair value hedge, the derivative is carried in the consolidated balance sheets at its estimated fair value, with changes in estimated fair value recognized in current period earnings. For discontinued cash flow hedges, including those where the derivative is sold, terminated or exercised, amounts previously deferred in other comprehensive income (loss) are reclassified into earnings when earnings are impacted by the cash flow of the hedged item.
If a derivative is not designated as an accounting hedge or its use in managing risk does not qualify for hedge accounting, changes in the estimated fair value of the derivative are generally reported within other gains (losses), which is a component of realizednet investment gains (losses). The fluctuations in estimated fair value of derivatives that have not been designated for hedge accounting can result in volatility in net earnings.

The Company receives and pledges cash or other securities as collateral on open derivative positions. Cash received as collateral is reported as an asset with a corresponding liability for the return of the collateral. Cash pledged as collateral is recorded as a reduction to cash, and a corresponding receivable is recognized for the return of the cash collateral. The Company generally can repledge or resell collateral obtained from counterparties, although the Company does not typically exercise such rights. Securities received as collateral are not recognized unless the Company was to exercise its


93

right to sell that collateral or exercise remedies on that collateral upon a counterparty default. Securities that the Company has pledged as collateral continue to be carried as investment assets on its balance sheet.

Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs: Certain direct and incremental costs of acquiring new businessinsurance contracts are deferred and amortized with interest over the premium payment periods in proportion to the ratio of annual earned premium income to total anticipated premium income.earned premium. Anticipated earned premium income is estimated by using the same mortality, persistency and interest assumptions used in computing liabilities for future policy benefits. In this manner, the related acquisition expenses are matched with revenues. Deferred costs include the excess of current-year commissions over ultimate renewal-year commissions and certain incremental direct policy issue, underwriting and sales expenses. All of these incremental costs are directly related to successful policy acquisition.

For some products, policyholders can elect to modify product benefits, features, rights or coverages by exchanging a contract for a new contract or by amendment, endorsement, or rider to a contract, or by the election of a feature or coverage within a contract. These transactions are known as internal replacements. The Company performs a two-stage analysis of the internal replacements to determine if the modification is substantive to the base policy. The stages of evaluation are as follows: 1) determine if the modification is integrated with the base policy, and 2) if it is integrated, determine if the resulting contract is substantially changed.

For internal replacement transactions where the resulting contract is substantially unchanged, the policy is accounted for as a continuation of the replaced contract. Unamortizedunamortized deferred acquisition costs from the original policy continue to be amortized over the expected life of the new policy, and the costs of replacing the policy are accounted for as policy maintenance

91



costs and expensed as incurred. Examples include conversions of same age bands, certain family coverage changes, pricing era changes (decrease), and ordinary life becomes reduced paid-up and certain reinstatements.
An
For an internal replacement transaction that results in a policy that is substantially changed, is accounted for as an extinguishment of the original policy and the issuance of a new policy. Unamortizedunamortized deferred acquisition costs on the original policy are immediately expensed, and the costs of acquiring the new policy are capitalized and amortized in accordance with the Company's accounting policies for deferred acquisition costs. Further, the policy reserves are evaluated based on the new policy features, and any change (up or down) necessary is recognized at the date of contract change/modification. Examples include conversions to higher age bands, certain family coverage changes, pricing era changes (increase), lapse & re-issue, certain reinstatements and certain other contract conversions.

Riders can be considered internal replacements that are either integrated or non-integrated resulting in either substantially changed or substantially unchanged treatment. Riders are evaluated based on the specific facts and circumstances of the rider and are considered an expansion of the existing benefits with additional premium required. Non-integrated riders to existing contracts do not change the Company's profit expectations for the related products and are treated as a new policy establishment for incremental coverage.

The Company measures the recoverability of DAC and the adequacy of its policy reserves annually by performing gross premium valuations on its business. (See

Goodwill: Goodwill is an asset representing the future economic benefits arising from other assets acquired in a business combination that are not individually identified and separately recognized. The amount of goodwill recognized is also impacted by measurement differences resulting from certain assets and liabilities not recorded at fair value (e.g. income taxes, employee benefits). Goodwill is not amortized, but is tested for impairment at a level of a reporting unit at least annually, in the same reporting period each year. Goodwill is included in the line item “Other” assets in the consolidated balance sheets and was $265 million as of December 31, 2022, compared with $268 million at December 31, 2021. A significant majority of the goodwill balance is attributable to the following discussionbusiness combinations within the Aflac U.S. segment, which represents the reporting unit for further information regarding policy reserves.)goodwill impairment testing: (i) CAIC acquisition in 2009, (ii) Empoweredbenefits, LLC acquisition in 2015, (iii) ABS acquisition in 2019, and (iv) acquisition of Zurich's business in 2020.

Policy Liabilities: Future policy benefits represent insurance claims that are expected to occur in the future and are computed following a net level premium method using estimated future investment yields, persistency and recognized morbidity and mortality tables modified to reflect the Company's experience, including a provision for adverse deviation. These assumptions are generally established and considered locked at policy inception. These assumptions may only be unlocked in certain circumstances based on the results of periodic DAC recoverability and premium deficiency testing.

Unpaid policy claims are estimates computed primarily on an undiscounted basis using statistical analyses of historical claims experience adjusted for current trends and changed conditions. The ultimate liability may vary significantly from such estimates. The Company regularly adjusts these estimates as new claims experience emerges and reflects the changes in operating results in the year such adjustments are made.

Unearned premiums consist primarily of discounted advance premiums on deposit from policyholders in conjunction with their purchase of certain Aflac Japan limited-pay insurance products. These advanced premiums are deferred upon collection and recognized as premium revenueearned premiums over the contractual premium payment period.


94


Other policyholders’ funds liability consists primarily of the fixed annuity line of business in Aflac Japan which has fixed benefits and premiums.

For internal replacements that are determined to not be substantially unchanged,changed, policy liabilities related to the original policy that was replaced are immediately released, and policy liabilities are established for the new insurance contract; however,contract. Further, the policy reserves are evaluated based on the new policy features, and changes are recognized at the date of contract change/modification. However, for internal replacements that are considered substantially unchanged, no changes to the reserves are recognized.

Reinsurance: The Company enters into reinsurance agreements with other companies in the normal course of business. For each reinsurance agreement, the Company determines if the agreement provides indemnification against loss or liability relating to insurance risk in accordance with applicable accounting standards. Reinsurance premiums and benefits paid or provided are accounted for on bases consistent with those used in accounting for the original policies issued and the terms of the reinsurance contracts. Premiums, benefits and DAC are reported net of insurance ceded.

Income Taxes: Income tax provisions are generally based on pretax earnings reported for financial statement purposes, which differ from those amounts used in preparing the Company's income tax returns. Deferred income taxes are recognized for temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and income tax basis of assets and liabilities, based on enacted tax laws and statutory tax rates applicable to the periods in which the Company expects the temporary differences to reverse. The Company records deferred tax assets for tax positions taken based on its assessment of whether the tax position is more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by taxing authorities. A valuation allowance is established for deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that an amount will not be realized.

Policyholder Protection Corporation and State Guaranty Association Assessments: In Japan, the government has required the insurance industry to contribute to a policyholder protection corporation. The Company recognizes a charge for

92



its estimated share of the industry's obligation once it is determinable. The Company reviews the estimated liability for policyholder protection corporation contributions on an annual basis and reports any adjustments in Aflac Japan's expenses.

In the U.S., each state has a guaranty association that supports insolvent insurers operating in those states. The Company's policy is to accrue assessments when the entity for which the insolvency relates has met its state of domicile's statutory definition of insolvency, the amount of the loss is reasonably estimable and the related premium upon which the assessment is based is written. See Note 15 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of the guaranty fund assessments charged to the Company.

Treasury Stock: Treasury stock is reflected as a reduction of shareholders' equity at cost. The Company uses the weighted-average purchase cost to determine the cost of treasury stock that is reissued. The Company includes any gains and losses in additional paid-in capital when treasury stock is reissued.

Share-Based Compensation: The Company measures compensation cost related to its share-based payment transactions at fair value on the grant date, and the Company recognizes those costs in the financial statements over the vesting period during which the employee provides service in exchange for the award. The Company has formalized itsmade an entity-wide accounting policy election to estimate the number of awards that are expected to vest and the corresponding forfeitures.

Earnings Per Share: The Company computes basic earnings per share (EPS) by dividing net earnings by the weighted-average number of unrestricted shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS is computed by dividing net earnings by the weighted-average number of shares outstanding for the period plus the shares representing the dilutive effect of share-based awards.

Reclassifications: Certain reclassifications have been made to prior-year amounts to conform to current-year reporting classifications. These reclassifications had no impact on net earnings or total shareholders' equity.


95


New Accounting Pronouncements

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

StandardDescriptionDate of AdoptionEffect on Financial Statements or Other Significant Matters
ASU 2020-04 Reference Rate Reform: Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting, as clarified and amended by:
ASU 2021-01 Reference Rate Reform: Relief Extended to Derivatives Impacted by Discounting Transition
ASU 2022-06 Reference Rate Reform: Deferral of the Sunset Date of Topic 848

In March 2020, the FASB issued amendments that provide optional expedients and exceptions for applying U.S. GAAP to contracts, hedging relationships, and other transactions affected by the reference rate reform if certain criteria are met. The amendments in this ASU only apply to contracts, hedging relationships, and other transactions that reference the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) or another reference rate expected to be discontinued because of reference rate reform.

An entity may elect to apply the amendments as of any date from the beginning of an interim period that includes or is subsequent to March 12, 2020, or prospectively from a date within an interim period that includes or is subsequent to March 12, 2020, up to the date that the financial statements are available to be issued.

In January 2021, the FASB issued a standard to permit entities to apply optional expedients in ASC 848 to derivative instruments modified because of discounting transition. Discounting transition refers to the changing of interest rates used for margining, discounting, or contract price alignment of derivative instruments to transition to alternative rates. The amendment is effective immediately.

In December 2022, the FASB issued amendments that defer the sunset date for applying the reference rate reform relief in ASC 848 from December 31, 2022, to December 31, 2024, after which entities will no longer be permitted to apply the optional expedients and exceptions. These amendments are effective immediately.

This standard was adopted on April 1, 2020. The adoption of the new guidance did not have an impact on the Company’s financial statements. The Company will continue to evaluate the impacts of reference rate reform on contract modifications and hedging relationships through December 31, 2024.

ASU 2019-04 Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses, Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, and Topic 825, Financial Instruments

In April 2019, the FASB issued Codification improvements to clarify and correct certain areas of guidance amended as part of ASU 2016-01, Financial Instruments - Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities; ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments; and ASU 2017-12, Derivative and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities.

The most significant of these improvements to the Company was related to the Codification improvement to ASU 2017-12 and the clarification that a one-time reclassification of assets that are eligible to be hedged under the last-of-layer method (i.e., certain pre-payable securities) from held-to-maturity to available-for-sale is allowed under the new hedge accounting guidance and would not impact the Company’s ability to continue to classify other bonds as held-to-maturity.

The other amendments related to ASU 2017-12 and 2016-01 are either not significant, or were previously implemented as part of the related ASU adoptions.

Applicable amendments related to ASU 2016-13 are discussed within the recent adoption of that update below.

This standard was adopted on January 1, 2020. The adoption of this guidance resulted in a reclassification of $6.9 billion (at amortized cost) of pre-payable fixed-maturity securities from the held-to-maturity to the available-for-sale category. The reclassification resulted in recording in beginning 2020 accumulated other comprehensive income a net unrealized gain of $848 million on an after-tax basis, based on the securities’ fair values on the reclassification date. The reclassification impacted the adoption of ASU 2016-13 (see ASU 2016-13 below for additional details).
Accounting Standard Update (ASU) 2018-16 Derivatives and Hedging Inclusion of the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) Overnight Index Swap (OIS) Rate as a Benchmark Interest Rate for Hedge Accounting Purposes
In October 2018, the FASB issued amendments to permit use of the Overnight Index Swap (OIS) rate based on the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) as a U.S. benchmark interest rate for hedge accounting purposes under Topic 815 in addition to the Treasury obligations of the U.S. government (UST), the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) swap rate, the OIS rate based on the Fed Funds Effective Rate, and the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (SIFMA) Municipal Swap Rate.Early adopted as of October 1, 2018The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or disclosures.
ASU 2018-15
Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - Internal-Use Software, Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract
In August 2018, the FASB issued amendments to align the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software.Early adopted as of January 1, 2019
The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or disclosures.

93


96

ASU 2016-13 Financial Instruments - Credit Losses: Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, as clarified and amended by:
ASU 2019-04 Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses, Topic 815,
Derivatives and Hedging, and Topic 825, Financial Instruments
ASU 2019-05 Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326), Targeted Transition Relief
ASU 2019-11 Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses

In June 2016, the FASB issued amendments that require a financial asset (or a group of financial assets) measured at amortized cost to be presented net of an allowance for credit losses (Credit Losses ASU) in order to reflect the amount expected to be collected on the financial asset(s).

This standard was adopted on January 1, 2020. The Company recorded a cumulative effect adjustment with a decrease to beginning 2020 retained earnings of $56 million, net of taxes. See Note 3 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for credit loss disclosures. The following line items in the consolidated balance sheets were most significantly impacted by the adoption of the new accounting standard:

Fixed maturity securities held to maturity, at amortized cost
Commercial mortgage and other loans
Reinsurance recoverable, included within Other asset

Accounting Pronouncements Pending Adoption

ASU 2018-12 Financial Services - Insurance: Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Long-Duration
Contracts, as clarified and amended by:
ASU 2019-09 Financial Services - Insurance: Effective Date
ASU 2020-11 Financial Services - Insurance: Effective Date and Early Application

In August 2018, the FASB issued amendments that will significantly change how insurers account for long-duration contracts. The amendments will change existing recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure requirements. Issues addressed in the new guidance include: 1) a requirement to review and, if there is a change, update assumptions for the liability for future policy benefits (LFBP) at least annually, and to update the discount rate assumption quarterly, 2) accounting for market risk benefits at fair value, 3) simplified amortization for deferred acquisition costs, and 4) enhanced financial statement presentation and disclosures.

In November 2019, the FASB issued an amendment extending the effective date for public business entities that meet the definition of a Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filer, excluding entities eligible to be small reporting companies as defined by the SEC, by one year.

In November 2020, the FASB issued an amendment providing an additional year deferral for all insurance entities due to the impact of COVID-19. The amendments are now effective for the Company for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2022. Early application of the amendments is permitted.

The Company will conclude implementation efforts and adopt the amendments as of January 1, 2023. The adoption will have a significant impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, and disclosures. The requirement to update assumptions for the LFPB will have a significant impact on the Company's results of operations, systems, processes and controls, and the requirement to update discount rates will have a significant impact on its equity.

As part of working toward implementation of the updated standard, the Company has made key accounting policy decisions, including establishing processes to identify insurance policy groupings (cohorts) for LFPB measurement and DAC amortization purposes, applicable discount rates, development of liability cash flow and claim expense assumptions, and DAC amortization methodology.

The Company did not early adopt the updated standard and has selected the modified retrospective transition method, which requires the amended guidance be applied as of the beginning of the earliest period presented beginning on the January 1, 2021 transition date (Transition Date). The modified retrospective transition method generally results in applying the guidance to contracts on the basis of existing carrying values as of the Transition Date. On the Transition Date, the Company calculates the ratio of expected benefits less existing carrying values to gross premiums (net premium ratio) using updated assumptions and the discount rate immediately before the Transition Date. For any cohorts that have a net premium ratio greater than 100% on the Transition Date, the net premium ratio is capped at 100%. The Company uses the net premium ratio calculated on the Transition Date (and capped at 100% if required) to calculate the LFPB using

StandardDescriptionDate of AdoptionEffect on Financial Statements or Other Significant Matters
ASU 2018-14
Compensation - Retirement Benefits - Defined Benefit Plans - General, Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans
In August 2018, the FASB issued amendments to modify the disclosure requirements for employers that sponsor defined benefit pension or other postretirement plans. Accordingly, six disclosures requirements were removed, two added and two clarified.Early adopted as of December 31, 2019The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or disclosures.
ASU 2018-03
Technical Corrections and Improvements to Financial Instruments - Overall Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
In February 2018, the FASB issued amendments to clarify certain aspects of the guidance issued in the original Financial Instruments - Overall - Recognition and Measurement pronouncement summarized below. Specifically, for entities who have chosen the measurement alternative approach for equity securities without readily determinable fair values, the amendments clarify that entities may change from a measurement alternative approach to a fair value method through an irrevocable election that would apply to a specific equity security and all identical or similar investments of the same issuer; entities should use an observable price at the date of the transaction rather than reporting date for the measurement alternative calculation; and insurance companies should use a prospective transition method when applying the measurement alternative.
Early adopted as of January 1, 2018The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, or disclosures.
ASU 2018-02
Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income: Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
In February 2018, the FASB issued amendments which allow a reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) to retained earnings of the effects of the change in the U.S. federal income tax rate resulting from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (Tax Act) on the gross deferred tax amounts and the corresponding valuation allowances related to items remaining in AOCI. The amendments eliminate the stranded tax effects resulting from the Tax Act and also require certain disclosures about the reclassified tax effects.Early adopted as of January 1, 2018
The amounts reclassified from
AOCI to retained earnings include the income tax effects of the change in the federal corporate tax rate enacted by the Tax Act. The Company’s policy is to follow the portfolio approach for releasing income tax effects from AOCI. The adoption of this guidance resulted in an increase to beginning 2018 AOCI of $374 million with a corresponding decrease to beginning 2018 retained earnings as of January 1, 2018.
ASU 2017-12
Derivatives and Hedging: Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities
In August 2017, the FASB issued guidance which improves and simplifies the accounting rules around hedge accounting and creates more transparency around how economic results are presented in financial statements. Issues addressed in this new guidance include: 1) risk component hedging, 2) accounting for the hedged item in fair value hedges of interest rate risk, 3) recognition and presentation of the effects of hedging instruments, and 4) amounts excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness.Early adopted as of October 1, 2018The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations, or disclosures.

97
94


two different discount rates: (i) the discount rate used immediately before the Transition Date, and (ii) the discount rate determined by reference to the Transition Date market level yields for upper-medium-grade (low credit risk) fixed income instruments (as of December 31, 2020). For cohorts with their net premium ratio capped at 100% on the Transition Date, any difference between the LFPB calculated using the discount rate immediately before the Transition Date and the existing carrying value as of the Transition Date is recorded as an adjustment (decrease) to opening retained earnings. For all cohorts on the Transition Date, the difference in the LFPB calculated using the two different discount rates (i.e., the discount rate used immediately before the Transition Date and the updated discount rate as of the Transition Date) is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) net of tax at transition.

Upon adoption, opening equity will be adjusted for the Transition Date impacts to AOCI and retained earnings and prior periods presented (years 2021 and 2022) will be restated following the updated standard. Based upon the modified retrospective transition method, the Transition Date impact from adoption will result in a decrease in AOCI of approximately $18.6 billion and a decrease in retained earnings of approximately $0.3 billion. The decrease in AOCI as of January 1, 2023 will be reduced to approximately $2.1 billion due to rising interest rates and a weakening of the yen.

The Company has designed its discount rate methodology for both the U.S. and Japan insurance business. The methodology incorporates constructing a discount rate curve separately for discounting cash flows used to calculate the U.S. and Japan LFPB, with each curve intended to be reflective of the currency, tenor and characteristics of the insurance liabilities. Discount rates comprising each curve are determined by reference to upper-medium grade (low credit risk) fixed-income instrument yields that reflect the duration characteristics of the corresponding insurance liabilities. The Company uses for these yields single-A rated fixed income instruments with credit ratings based on international rating standards. Where only local ratings are available, the Company selects the fixed-income instruments with local ratings that are equivalent to a single-A rating based on international rating standards. The methodology is designed to prioritize observable inputs based on market data available in the local debt markets where the respective policies were issued in the currency in which the policies are denominated. For the discount rates applicable to tenors for which the single-A debt market is not liquid or there is little or no observable market data, the Company uses various estimation techniques consistent with the fair value guidance in ASC 820, which include, but are not limited to: (i) for tenors where there is less observable market data and/or the observable market data is available for similar instruments, estimating tenor-specific single-A credit spreads and applying them to risk-free government rates; (ii) for tenors where there is very limited or no observable single-A or similar market data, interpolation and extrapolation techniques. Discount rates are updated each reporting period.

Long duration insurance contracts issued by the Company will be grouped into annual calendar-year cohorts based on the contract issue date, reportable segment, legal entity and product type. Limited pay contracts will be grouped into separate cohorts from other traditional products in the same manner and will be further separated based on their premium payment structures. Riders will be combined with base policies with similar insurance coverage types and the same contract issue years.

In addition to the policy elections related to cohorts and LFPB discount rates directly impacting Transition Date AOCI, the Company has also made the following accounting policy elections relevant to the post-Transition Date accounting:

All payments under an insurance contract including future expected claims and already incurred claims (i.e., claim liabilities) and related expenses will be measured together as an integrated reserve. This will result in the following presentation changes in the consolidated balance sheet: (i) unpaid policy claims on long-duration insurance contracts and accrued claim adjustment expenses presented separately pre-adoption will be presented as part of LFPB; and (ii) liabilities for fixed annuity benefits will be excluded from the integrated reserve, as they are outside the scope of the amended standard, and will be presented in other policyholders' funds.
The Company will update the net premium ratio each quarter to reflect actual gross premiums and benefits in the quarter and updated expected future cash flows based on the actual ending insurance in force. Cash flow assumptions will also be evaluated each quarter to determine if an update is needed. To facilitate a more detailed review of cash flow assumptions, experience studies will be performed annually in the consistent quarter year-to-year to substantiate assumptions, including mortality, morbidity, and terminations in future periods.
Locked-in discount rates used for the computation of interest accretion on LFPB for policies issued on or after January 1, 2021 will be determined for each issue-year cohort as a single discount rate, calculated as the weighted-average of monthly upper-medium grade (low credit risk) fixed-income instrument forward curves over the calendar year, determined using the methodology described above and weighted using issued annualized premiums for each issue month. The single discount rate for each issue-year cohort will remain unchanged after

StandardDescriptionDate of AdoptionEffect on Financial Statements or Other Significant Matters
ASU 2017-09
Compensation - Stock Compensation: Scope of Modification Accounting
In May 2017, the FASB issued amendments to provide guidance clarifying when changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award must be accounted for as modifications. An entity should apply modification accounting if the fair value, vesting conditions or classification of the award (as an equity instrument or liability instrument) changes as a result of the change in terms or conditions of the award.January 1, 2018The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations, or disclosures.
ASU 2017-08
Receivables - Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs: Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities

In March 2017, the FASB issued amendments to shorten the amortization period for certain callable debt securities held at a premium. Specifically, the amendments require the premium to be amortized to the earliest call date. The amendments do not require an accounting change for securities held at a discount.Early adopted as of July 1, 2018
The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, or disclosures.

ASU 2017-07
Compensation - Retirement Benefits: Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost
In March 2017, the FASB issued amendments requiring that an employer report the service cost component of net periodic pension cost and net periodic postretirement benefit cost in the same line item or items as other compensation costs arising from services rendered by the pertinent employees during the period. The other components of net periodic pension cost and net periodic postretirement benefit cost are required to be presented in the income statement separately from the service cost component and outside a subtotal of income from operations, if one is presented. If a separate line item or items are used to present the other components of net benefit cost, that line item or items must be appropriately described. If a separate line item or items are not used, the line item or items used in the income statement to present the other components of net benefit cost must be disclosed. The amendments in this update also allow only the service cost component to be eligible for capitalization when applicable.January 1, 2018The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations, or disclosures.
ASU 2017-05
Other Income - Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets: Clarifying the Scope of Asset Derecognition Guidance and Accounting for Partial Sales of Nonfinancial Assets
In February 2017, the FASB issued amendments that clarify the scope and accounting guidance for the derecognition of a nonfinancial asset or a financial asset that meets the definition of an "in substance nonfinancial asset." The amendments define an "in substance nonfinancial asset" and provide additional accounting guidance for partial sales of nonfinancial assets.January 1, 2018The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations, or disclosures.
ASU 2017-01
Business Combinations: Clarifying the Definition of a Business
In January 2017, the FASB issued amendments clarifying when a set of assets and activities is a business. The amendments provide a screen to exclude transactions where substantially all the fair value of the transferred set is concentrated in a single asset, or group of similar assets, from being evaluated as a business.January 1, 2018The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations, or disclosures.

98
95


the calendar year of issue. Locked-in discount rates on the policies held at Transition Date reflect the locked-in rates in existence immediately before the Transition Date.
For DAC amortization, the Company has elected to group insurance policies into cohorts that are consistent with the groupings used in estimating the associated LFPB. DAC will be amortized on a constant level basis for the grouped contracts over the expected remaining term of the related contracts. For both life and health products issued by Aflac Japan, the constant-level basis used will be units in force, which is a proxy for face amount and insurance in force, respectively. For life products issued by Aflac U.S., the constant level basis used will be face amount of policies in force; for health products issued by Aflac U.S., the constant level basis used will be the number of policies in force.
The Company has made an entity-wide election to use locked-in claim expense assumptions determined for each issue-year cohort as a percentage of paid claims; these assumptions remain unchanged over the term of the insurance policy. Under the amended guidance, certain insurance commissions and expenses must be excluded from the expense assumption, which will result in an increase in the deferred profit liability on limited-payment products compared to current guidance. In conjunction with the adoption of the updated standard effective January 1, 2023, the Company will change its practice of recording the change in the deferred profit liability on products with limited-payment features from the benefits and claims, net line item to the net earned premiums line item in the consolidated statement of earnings. This reclassification will have no impact on net earnings. The change in presentation will be made for all comparative periods presented and has been reflected in the consolidated statements of earnings and consolidated balance sheets as of and for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 as adjusted under the amended guidance and presented below as part of this Note 1.

The Company has created a governance framework and a plan to support implementation of the updated standard. As part of its implementation plan, the Company has completed the modernization of its actuarial technology platform to enhance its modeling, data management, experience study and analytical capabilities, increase the end-to-end automation of key reporting and analytical processes and optimize its control framework. The Company has also put in place internal controls related to the new processes created as part of implementing the updated standard.

The Company continues testing its reporting and disclosure capabilities under the new ASU for post-Transition Date accounting periods.

The Company currently has no products with market risk benefits.

Impacts on Previously Reported Results

Impacts from the adoption of ASU 2018-12 to the Company's previously reported results are expected to be as follows:


StandardDescriptionDate of AdoptionEffect on Financial Statements or Other Significant Matters
ASU 2016-18
Statement of Cash Flows: Restricted Cash
In November 2016, the FASB issued amendments requiring that a statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents.January 1, 2018The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations, statements of cash flows, or disclosures.
ASU 2016-17
Consolidation - Interests Held through Related Parties That Are under Common Control
In October 2016, the FASB issued amendments which clarify the consolidation guidance on how a reporting entity that is the single decision maker of a variable interest entity (VIE) should treat indirect interests in the entity held through related parties that are under common control with the reporting entity when determining whether it is the primary beneficiary of that VIE.January 1, 2017The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations, or disclosures.
ASU 2016-16
Income Taxes: Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory
In October 2016, the FASB issued amendments that require an entity to recognize the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory when the transfer occurs.January 1, 2018The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations, or disclosures.
ASU 2016-15 Statement of Cash Flows: Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments
In August 2016, the FASB issued amendments that provide guidance on eight specific statement of cash flow classification issues, including distributions received from equity method investees.January 1, 2018The Company elected nature of distribution for distributions received from equity method investees. The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the Company's financial position, statement of cash flows, results of operations, or disclosures.
ASU 2016-09
Compensation - Stock Compensation: Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

In March 2016, the FASB issued amendments which simplify several aspects for share-based payment award transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either liability or equity, classification of taxes paid on the statement of cash flows and treatment of forfeitures.


January 1, 2017As a result of applying this requirement, the Company believes that recognition of excess tax benefits will increase volatility in its statement of operations and the Company made an entity-wide accounting policy election to estimate the number of awards that are expected to vest (consistent with the Company's prior policy), but the adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations, statements of cash flows, or disclosures.
ASU 2016-07
Investments - Equity Method and Joint Ventures - Simplifying the Transition to the Equity Method of
Accounting
In March 2016, the FASB issued amendments which eliminate the requirement that when an investment qualifies for use of the equity method as a result of an increase in the level of ownership interest or degree of influence, an investor must adjust the investment, results of operations, and retained earnings retroactively on a step-by-step basis as if the equity method had been in effect during all previous periods that the investment had been held. Per the amendments, upon qualifying for the equity method of accounting, no retroactive adjustment of the investment is required.January 1, 2017The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations, or disclosures.

99
96



Consolidated Statement of Earnings
Year Ended December 31, 2022
(In millions)As
Reported
Adoption
Impacts
As
Adjusted
Revenues:
Net earned premiums, principally supplemental health insurance (1)
$15,263 $(362)$14,901 
Net investment income3,656 0 3,656 
Net investment gains (losses)363 0 363 
Other income (loss)220 0 220 
Total revenues19,502 (362)19,140 
Benefits and expenses:
Benefits and claims, excluding reserve remeasurement (1),(2)
9,153 (51)9,102 
Reserve remeasurement (gains) losses (3)
0 (215)(215)
Total benefits and claims, net9,153 (266)8,887 
Acquisition and operating expenses:
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs (4)
1,152 (360)792 
Insurance commissions1,117 0 1,117 
Insurance and other expenses (5)
3,250 (1)3,249 
Interest expense226 0 226 
Total acquisition and operating expenses5,745 (361)5,384 
Total benefits and expenses14,898 (627)14,271 
Earnings before income taxes4,604 265 4,869 
Income taxes (6)
403 48 451 
Net earnings$4,201 $217 $4,418 
(1) Adjustment reflects a $324 increase in the deferred profit liability on limited-payment products under the updated standard combined with the reclassification of a $38 increase in deferred profit liability previously reported in benefits and claims and reclassified to net earned premiums in conjunction with adoption of the updated standard.
(2) Adjustment reflects 2022 activity for the effect of calculating benefits using revised net premium ratios and best estimate future cash flow projections, excluding reserve remeasurement impacts.
(3) Adjustment reflects the reserve remeasurement on the liability for future policy benefits due to applying revised net premium ratios based on updated historical actuals and revised assumptions to past periods each quarter under the updated standard.
(4) Adjustment reflects a decrease in DAC amortization due to DAC assets being amortized over the expected life of a contract and no interest accretion recorded under the updated standard.
(5) Adjustment reflects 2022 activity for the change in accrued claim adjustment expenses that are included in benefits and claims as a component of the integrated reserve under the updated standard.
(6) Adjustment reflects an increase in income tax expense associated with the increase in pretax earnings.

StandardDescriptionDate of AdoptionEffect on Financial Statements or Other Significant Matters
ASU 2016-06
Derivatives and Hedging - Contingent Put and Call Options in Debt Instruments
In March 2016, the FASB issued amendments which clarify what steps are required when assessing whether the economic characteristics and risks of call (put) options are clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics and risks of their debt hosts, which is one of the criteria for bifurcating an embedded derivative. Consequently, when a call (put) option is contingently exercisable, an entity does not have to assess whether the event that triggers the ability to exercise a call (put) option is related to interest rates or credit risks.January 1, 2017The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations, or disclosures.
ASU 2016-05
Derivatives and Hedging - Effect of Derivative Contract Novations on Existing Hedge Accounting
Relationships
In March 2016, the FASB issued amendments which clarify that a change in the counterparty to a derivative instrument that has been designated as the hedging instrument does not, in and of itself, require dedesignation of that hedging relationship provided that all other hedge accounting criteria remain intact.January 1, 2017The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations, or disclosures.


100
97



Consolidated Statement of Earnings
Year Ended December 31, 2021
(In millions)As
Reported
Adoption
Impacts
As
Adjusted
Revenues:
Net earned premiums, principally supplemental health insurance (1)
$17,647 $(552)$17,095 
Net investment income3,818 0 3,818 
Net investment gains (losses)468 0 468 
Other income (loss)173 0 173 
Total revenues22,106 (552)21,554 
Benefits and expenses:
Benefits and claims, excluding reserve remeasurement (1)(2)
10,576 47 10,623 
Reserve remeasurement (gains) losses (3)
0 (147)(147)
Total benefits and claims, net10,576 (100)10,476 
Acquisition and operating expenses:
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs (4)
1,170 (335)835 
Insurance commissions1,256 0 1,256 
Insurance and other expenses (5)
3,544 (3)3,541 
Interest expense238 0 238 
Total acquisition and operating expenses6,208 (338)5,870 
Total benefits and expenses16,784 (438)16,346 
Earnings before income taxes5,322 (114)5,208 
Income taxes (6)
997 (20)977 
Net earnings$4,325 $(94)$4,231 
(1) Adjustment reflects a $489 increase in the deferred profit liability on limited-payment products under the updated standard combined with the reclassification of a $63 increase in deferred profit liability previously reported in benefits and claims and reclassified to net earned premiums in conjunction with adoption of the updated standard.
(2) Adjustment reflects 2021 activity for the effect of calculating benefits using revised net premium ratios and best estimate future cash flow projections, excluding reserve remeasurement impacts.
(3) Adjustment reflects the reserve remeasurement on the liability for future policy benefits due to applying revised net premium ratios based on updated historical actuals and revised assumptions to past periods each quarter under the updated standard.
(4) Adjustment reflects a decrease in DAC amortization due to DAC assets being amortized over the expected life of a contract and no interest accretion recorded under the updated standard.
(5) Adjustment reflects 2021 activity for the change in accrued claim adjustment expenses that are included in benefits and claims as a component of the integrated reserve under the updated standard.
(6) Adjustment reflects a decrease in income tax expense associated with the decrease in pretax earnings.

StandardDescriptionDate of AdoptionEffect on Financial Statements or Other Significant Matters
ASU 2016-02
Leases

as clarified and amended by:
ASU 2018-01, Leases: Land Easement Practical Expedient for Transition to Topic 842,
ASU 2018-10, Codification Improvements to Topic 842, Leases,
ASU 2018-11, Leases, Targeted Improvements, and
ASU 2018-20, Leases: Narrow-Scope Improvements for Lessors
In February 2016, the FASB issued updated guidance for accounting for leases (“Leases Update”). Per the Leases Update, lessees are required to recognize all leases on the balance sheet with the exception of short-term leases. A lease liability will be recorded for the obligation of a lessee to make lease payments arising from a lease. Leases will be classified as finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern and classification of expense recognition in the income statement. The Leases Update provided a number of optional practical expedients. The Company elected the "package of practical expedients," which permits the Company not to reassess under the new standard its prior conclusions about lease identification, lease classification and initial direct costs. Under the Leases Update, lessor accounting is largely unchanged.

In January 2018, an amendment was issued to the Leases Update which provided an entity with the option to elect a transition practical expedient to not evaluate land easements that exist or expired before the entity's adoption of the Leases Update and that were not previously accounted for as leases.

In July 2018, the FASB issued two amendments to the Leases Update which clarified, corrected errors in, or made minor improvements to the Leases Update and provided entities with an optional transition method to adopt the Leases Update by recording a cumulative-effect adjustment to beginning retained earnings. Additionally, the amendments provided lessors with a practical expedient to not separate nonlease components from associated lease components and instead account for those components as a single component under certain conditions.

In December 2018, an amendment to the Leases Update was issued to clarify: 1) lessor accounting for all sales (and other similar) taxes; 2) the handling of certain lessor costs when the amount of those costs is not readily determinable; and 3) lessor allocation of certain variable payments to the lease and non-lease components.
January 1, 2019
The Company has operating and finance leases for office space and equipment. The Company elected the short-term lease exemption for all classes of leases which allows the Company to not recognize right-of-use assets and lease liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet and allows the Company to recognize the lease expense for short-term leases on a straight-line basis over the lease term. The Company elected the practical expedient to not separate lease and non-lease components and applied it to all classes of leases where the non-lease components are not significant. Some of the Company's leases include options to extend or terminate the lease and the lease terms may include such options when it is reasonably certain that the Company will exercise that option. Certain leases also include options to purchase the leased property. The leases within scope of the leases update increased the Company's right-of-use assets and lease liabilities recorded in its consolidated balance sheet by $134 million.

As of January 1, 2019, the Company did not have land easements, but has elected the practical expedient as a safe harbor.

The Company elected the optional transition method and as a safe harbor, the practical expedient provided to lessors.
 
The Company has made an accounting policy election to exclude amounts collected from customers for all sales (and other similar) taxes from the transaction price.
  
The adoption of the Leases Update and related amendments did not have a significant impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations, or disclosures.

101
98



Consolidated Balance Sheet
December 31, 2022
StandardDescriptionDate of AdoptionEffect on Financial Statements or Other Significant Matters
ASU 2016-01
(In millions)As
Reported
Adoption
Impacts
As
Adjusted
Assets:
Investments and cash:
Fixed maturity securities available for sale, at fair value$71,936 $0 $71,936 
Fixed maturity securities available for sale - consolidated variable
  interest entities, at fair value
3,805 0 3,805 
Fixed maturity securities held to maturity, at amortized cost,
  net of allowance for credit losses
19,056 0 19,056 
Equity securities, at fair value1,091 0 1,091 
Commercial mortgage and other loans, net of allowance for credit losses13,496 0 13,496 
Other investments4,070 0 4,070 
Cash and cash equivalents3,943 0 3,943 
Total investments and cash117,397 0 117,397 
Receivables647 0 647 
Accrued investment income745 0 745 
Deferred policy acquisition costs (1)
8,593 646 9,239 
Property and equipment530 0 530 
Other (2)
3,105 75 3,180 
Total assets$131,017 $721 $131,738 
Liabilities and shareholders’ equity:
Liabilities:
Policy liabilities:
Future policy benefits (3),(4),(5)
$80,749 $7,492 $88,241 
Unpaid policy claims (3),(6)
4,561 (4,360)201 
Unearned premiums1,825 0 1,825 
Other policyholders’ funds (6)
6,123 520 6,643 
Total policy liabilities93,258 3,652 96,910 
Income taxes (7)
1,296 (598)698 
Payables for return of cash collateral on loaned securities1,809 0 1,809 
Notes payable and lease obligations7,442 0 7,442 
Other (4)
4,847 (108)4,739 
Total liabilities108,652 2,946 111,598 
Commitments and contingent liabilities
Shareholders’ equity:
Common stock135 0 135 
Additional paid-in capital2,641 0 2,641 
Retained earnings (8)
44,568 (201)44,367 
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss):
Unrealized foreign currency translation gains (losses) (9)
(3,640)76 (3,564)
Unrealized gains (losses) on fixed maturity securities(702)0 (702)
Unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives(27)0 (27)
Effect of changes in discount rate assumptions (10)
0 (2,100)(2,100)
Pension liability adjustment(36)0 (36)
Treasury stock(20,574)0 (20,574)
Total shareholders’ equity22,365 (2,225)20,140 
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity$131,017 $721 $131,738 
(1) Adjustment reflects an increase in DAC assets as a result of DAC being amortized over the expected life of a contract and no interest accretion recorded under the updated standard.
(2) Adjustment reflects the discounting of reinsurance recoverables under the updated standard.
(3) Adjustment for the reclassification of unpaid policy claims for long-duration contracts to future policy benefits as a component of the integrated reserve.
(4) Adjustment for the reclassification of accrued claim adjustment expenses from other liabilities to future policy benefits as a component of the integrated reserve.
(5) Adjustment reflects the impacts of adopting the standard and post-adoption impacts including calculating benefit reserves using revised net premium ratios and an increase in the deferred profit liability on limited-payment products
(6) Adjustment for the reclassification of the claims liability for certain fixed annuity benefits from unpaid policy claims to other policyholders' funds.
(7) Adjustment reflects the tax effects from adoption and post-adoption activity under the updated standard.
(8) Adjustment reflects the cumulative impact from adoption and post-adoption activity under the updated standard, including the increase in 2022 net earnings of $217.
(9) Adjustment reflects foreign currency translation related to the updated standard, as applicable.
(10) Adjustment reflects the cumulative impact from adoption and post-adoption activity under the updated standard, including an increase of $13,732 in 2022 due to changes in the discount rate assumptions.
Financial Instruments - Overall: Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
In January 2016, the FASB issued guidance to address certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments. The main provisions of this guidance require certain equity investments to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net earnings; separate presentation in other comprehensive income for changes in fair value of financial liabilities measured under the fair value option that are due to instrument-specific credit risk; and changes in disclosures associated with the fair value of financial instruments. The guidance also clarifies that entities should evaluate the need for a valuation allowance on a deferred tax asset (DTA) related to available-for-sale (AFS) securities in combination with the entity's other DTAs.January 1, 2018The Company recorded a cumulative effect adjustment with an increase to beginning 2018 retained earnings and a decrease to beginning 2018 AOCI of $148 million, net of taxes.

Accounting Pronouncements Pending Adoption
StandardDescriptionEffect on Financial Statements or Other Significant Matters
ASU 2020-01
Clarifying the interactions between Topic 321, Topic 323, and Topic 815

In January 2020, the FASB issued amendments clarifying that an entity should consider observable transactions that require it to either apply or discontinue the equity method of accounting for the purposes of applying the measurement alternative in accordance with Topic 321 immediately before applying or upon discontinuing the equity method.

In addition, the amendments clarify that for the purpose of applying certain derivative guidance in Topic 815, an entity should not consider whether, upon the settlement of the forward contract or exercise of the purchased option, individually or with existing investments, the underlying securities would be accounted for under the equity method in Topic 323 or the fair value option in accordance with the financial instruments guidance in Topic 825. An entity also would evaluate the remaining characteristics in Topic 815 to determine the accounting for those forward contracts and purchased options.

The amendments are effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted.
The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations, or disclosures.


99

102


Consolidated Balance Sheet
December 31, 2021
StandardDescriptionEffect on Financial Statements or Other Significant Matters
ASU 2019-04
(In millions)As
Reported
Adoption
Impacts
As
Adjusted
Assets:
Investments and cash:
Fixed maturity securities available for sale, at fair value$94,206 $0 $94,206 
Fixed maturity securities available for sale - consolidated variable
  interest entities, at fair value
4,490 0 4,490 
Fixed maturity securities held to maturity, at amortized cost,
  net of allowance for credit losses
22,000 0 22,000 
Equity securities, at fair value1,603 0 1,603 
Commercial mortgage and other loans, net of allowance for credit losses11,786 0 11,786 
Other investments3,842 0 3,842 
Cash and cash equivalents5,051 0 5,051 
Total investments and cash142,978 0 142,978 
Receivables672 0 672 
Accrued investment income737 0 737 
Deferred policy acquisition costs (1)
9,525 323 9,848 
Property and equipment538 0 538 
Other (2)
3,092 285 3,377 
Total assets$157,542 $608 $158,150 
Liabilities and shareholders’ equity:
Liabilities:
Policy liabilities:
Future policy benefits (3),(4),(5)
$90,588 $25,376 $115,964 
Unpaid policy claims (3),(6)
4,836 (4,685)151 
Unearned premiums2,576 0 2,576 
Other policyholders’ funds (6)
7,072 568 7,640 
Total policy liabilities105,072 21,259 126,331 
Income taxes (7)
4,339 (4,309)30 
Payables for return of cash collateral on loaned securities2,162 0 2,162 
Notes payable and lease obligations7,956 0 7,956 
Other (4)
4,760 (120)4,640 
Total liabilities124,289 16,830 141,119 
Commitments and contingent liabilities
Shareholders’ equity:
Common stock135 0 135 
Additional paid-in capital2,529 0 2,529 
Retained earnings (8)
41,381 (418)40,963 
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss):
Unrealized foreign currency translation gains (losses) (9)
(2,013)28 (1,985)
Unrealized gains (losses) on fixed maturity securities9,602 0 9,602 
Unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives(30)0 (30)
Effect of changes in discount rate assumptions (10)
0 (15,832)(15,832)
Pension liability adjustment(166)0 (166)
Treasury stock(18,185)0 (18,185)
Total shareholders’ equity33,253 (16,222)17,031 
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity$157,542 $608 $158,150 
(1) Adjustment reflects an increase in DAC assets as a result of DAC being amortized over the expected life of a contract and no interest accretion recorded under the updated standard.
(2) Adjustment reflects the discounting of reinsurance recoverables under the updated standard.
(3) Adjustment for the reclassification of unpaid policy claims for long-duration contracts to future policy benefits as a component of the integrated reserve.
(4) Adjustment for the reclassification of accrued claim adjustment expenses from other liabilities to future policy benefits as a component of the integrated reserve.
(5) Adjustment reflects the impacts of adopting the standard and post-adoption impacts including calculating benefit reserves using revised net premium ratios and an increase in the deferred profit liability on limited-payment products
(6) Adjustment for the reclassification of the claims liability for certain fixed annuity benefits from unpaid policy claims to other policyholders' funds.
(7) Adjustment reflects the tax effects from adoption and post-adoption activity under the updated standard.
(8) Adjustment reflects the impacts from adoption of ($324) as a result of capping the net premium ratio at 100% for cohorts that are in a loss position at transition and post-adoption activity under the updated standard, including the decrease in 2021 net earnings of $(94).
(9) Adjustment reflects foreign currency translation related to the updated standard, as applicable.
(10) Adjustment reflects the impacts from adoption of ($18,570) and post-adoption activity under the updated standard, including $2,738 in 2021 due to changes in the discount rate assumptions.
Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses, Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, and Topic 825, Financial Instruments
In April 2019, the FASB issued Codification improvements to clarify and correct certain areas of guidance amended as part of ASU 2016-01, Financial Instruments - Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities; ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments; and ASU 2017-12, Derivative and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities.  

The most significant of these improvements to the Company was related to the Codification improvement to ASU 2017-12 and the clarification that a one-time reclassification of assets that are eligible to be hedged under the last-of-layer method (i.e., certain pre-payable securities) from held-to-maturity to available-for-sale is allowed under the new hedge accounting guidance and would not impact the Company’s ability to continue to classify other bonds as held-to-maturity. This clarification is effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2020, with early adoption permitted. If a reclassification is elected, it must be reflected as of the date of adoption of this update.

The other amendments related to ASU 2017-12 and 2016-01 are either not significant, or were previously implemented as part of the related ASU adoptions.

Applicable amendments related to ASU 2016-13 are discussed within the pending adoption of that update below.



The Company did not reclassify any assets from held-to-maturity to available-for-sale as part of its implementation of ASU 2017-12, and is therefore eligible to reclassify qualifying securities as a result of these clarifications. Effective on January 1, 2020, the Company anticipates the reclassification of approximately $6.9 billion (at amortized cost) of pre-payable fixed-maturity securities from the held-to-maturity to the available-for-sale category. This reclassification is expected to result in recording in accumulated other comprehensive income a net unrealized gain of approximately $800 million on an after-tax basis, based on the securities’ fair values on the reclassification date. The reclassification will impact the adoption of ASU 2016-13 which will be effective January 1, 2020 (see ASU 2016-13 below for additional details).

ASU 2018-17 Consolidation: Targeted Improvements to Related Party Guidance for Variable Interest Entities
In October 2018, the FASB issued targeted improvements which provide that indirect interests held through related parties under common control should be considered on a proportional basis for determining whether fees paid to decision makers and service providers are variable interests. The amendments are effective for public business entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted.
The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or disclosures.
ASU 2018-13
Fair Value Measurement, Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement
In August 2018, the FASB issued amendments to the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements. The amendments remove, modify, and add certain disclosures. The amendments are effective for all entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted. Further, an entity is permitted to early adopt any removed or modified disclosures upon issuance of this update and delay adoption of the additional disclosures until their effective date.The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, or disclosures.


100

103


StandardDescriptionEffect on Financial Statements or Other Significant Matters
ASU 2018-12
Financial Services - Insurance, Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Long-Duration Contracts
as clarified and amended by:
ASU No. 2019-09,Financial Services Insurance (Topic 944)- Effective Date
In August 2018, the FASB issued amendments that will significantly change how insurers account for long-duration contracts. The amendments will change existing recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure requirements. Issues addressed in the new guidance include: 1) a requirement to review and, if there is a change, update assumptions for the liability for future policy benefits at least annually, and to update the discount rate assumption quarterly, 2) accounting for market risk benefits at fair value, 3) simplified amortization for deferred acquisition costs, and 4) enhanced financial statement presentation and disclosures.

In November 2019, the FASB issued an amendment extending the effective date for public business entities that meet the definition of an SEC filer, excluding entities eligible to be small reporting companies as defined by the SEC, by one year. The amendments are now effective for the Company for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2021. Early application of the amendments is permitted.

The Company is thoroughly evaluating the impact of adoption and expects that the adoption will have a significant impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, and disclosures. The Company anticipates that the requirement to update assumptions for liability for future policy benefits will have a significant impact on its results of operations, systems, processes and controls while the requirement to update the discount rate will have a significant impact on its equity. The Company has no products with market risk benefits. The Company does not expect to early adopt the updated standard and has tentatively selected a modified retrospective transition method.
ASU 2017-04
Intangibles - Goodwill and Other: Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment
In January 2017, the FASB issued amendments simplifying the subsequent measurement of goodwill. An entity, under this update, is no longer required to perform a hypothetical purchase price allocation to measure goodwill impairment. Instead, the entity should perform its annual or interim goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. The amendments are effective for public business entities that are SEC filers for annual or any interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for any goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017.The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations, or disclosures.


101



StandardDescriptionEffect on Financial Statements or Other Significant Matters
ASU 2016-13
Financial Instruments - Credit Losses: Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

as clarified and amended by:
ASU 2019-04, Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses, Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, and Topic 825, Financial Instruments,
ASU 2019-05, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326), Targeted Transition Relief
and
ASU 2019-11, Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments- Credit Losses

In June 2016, the FASB issued amendments that require a financial asset (or a group of financial assets) measured at amortized cost to be presented net of an allowance for credit losses (Credit Losses ASU) in order to reflect the amount expected to be collected on the financial asset(s). The measurement of expected credit losses is amended by replacing the incurred loss impairment methodology in current U.S. GAAP with a methodology that reflects expected credit losses and requires consideration of a broader range of reasonable and supportable information. Credit losses on available-for-sale debt securities will be measured in a manner similar to current U.S. GAAP; however, the amendments require that credit losses be presented as an allowance rather than as a write-down. Other amendments include changes to the balance sheet presentation and interest income recognition of purchased financial assets with a more-than-insignificant credit deterioration since origination (PCD financial assets).

The Credit Losses ASU is effective for public companies for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Companies may early adopt this guidance as of the fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The amendments will be adopted following a modified-retrospective approach resulting in a cumulative effect adjustment in retained earnings as of the beginning of the year of adoption. Two exceptions to this adoption method are for PCD financial assets and debt securities for which other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) will have been recognized before the effective date. Loans purchased with credit deterioration accounted for under current U.S. GAAP as "purchased credit impaired" (PCI) financial assets will be classified as PCD financial assets at transition and PCD guidance will be applied prospectively. Debt securities that have experienced OTTI before the effective date will follow a prospective adoption method which allows an entity to maintain the same amortized cost basis before and after the effective date.

In April 2019, the Credit Losses ASU was amended to allow entities to make a policy election about presentation and disclosure of accrued interest receivable and the related credit losses, whereby entities that write off uncollectible accrued interest receivable in a timely manner can make a policy election not to measure an allowance on the accrued interest receivable. Other amendments made within this Update clarify and address stakeholders’ specific issues about certain aspects of the Credit Losses ASU.

In May 2019, the FASB granted a targeted transition relief by allowing to irrevocably elect the fair value option for certain financial assets previously measured at amortized cost.

These amendments will be effective upon adoption of the Credit Losses ASU.
The Company has identified the following financial instruments in scope of the new guidance: certain fixed maturity securities, loans and loan receivables, reinsurance recoverable, as well as certain other receivable balances and off-balance sheet arrangements.

The Company has concluded that of the held-to-maturity fixed maturity securities, Japanese government and agency securities and certain Japanese government-guaranteed mortgage backed securities meet the requirements for a zero-loss expectation and therefore will not be included in the current expected credit loss measurement process upon adoption of the new standard.

The Company has substantially completed the review and validation of credit models, methodologies and inputs for all asset classes. The Company performed parallel runs during the second, third and fourth quarters and refined its estimation process with additional parallel testing throughout 2019. The Company has estimated the adoption-date net after-tax impact at a $56 million decrease to retained earnings. As noted above relative to ASU 2019-04, the Company is planning a one-time reclassification as of January 1, 2020 of approximately $6.9 billion (amortized cost as of December 31, 2019) of its eligible fixed-maturity securities from held-to-maturity to available-for-sale category. The aforementioned reclassification has been reflected in the expected impact estimate from adoption of ASU 2016-13. The Company plans to adopt this ASU on January 1, 2020.


Recent accounting guidance not discussed above is not applicable, did not have, or is not expected to have a material impact to the Company's business. 


1022.BUSINESS SEGMENT AND FOREIGN INFORMATION



2.BUSINESS SEGMENT AND FOREIGN INFORMATION
The Company consists of 2two reportable insurance business segments: Aflac Japan and Aflac U.S., both of which sell supplemental health and life insurance. In addition, the Parent Company, other operating business units that are not individually reportable, and business activities, including reinsurance retrocession activities, not included in Aflac Japan or Aflac U.S. are included in Corporate and other.

The Company does not allocate corporate overhead expenses to business segments. Consistent with U.S. GAAP accounting guidance for segment reporting, the Company evaluates and manages its business segments using a financial performance measure called pretax adjusted earnings. Adjusted earnings are adjusted revenues less benefits and adjusted expenses. The adjustments to both revenues and expenses account for certain items that cannot be predicted or that are outside management’s control. Adjusted revenues are U.S. GAAP total revenues excluding realizednet investment gains and losses, except for amortized hedge costs/income related to foreign currency exposure management strategies and net interest cash flows from derivatives associated with certain investment strategies. Adjusted expenses are U.S. GAAP total acquisition and operating expenses including the impact of interest cash flows from derivatives associated with notes payable but excluding any nonrecurring or other items not associated with the normal course of the Company’s insurance operations and that do not reflect Aflac’sthe Company’s underlying business performance. The Company excludes income taxes related to operations to arrive at pretax adjusted earnings. Information regarding operations by reportable segment and Corporate and other for the years ended December 31 follows:
(In millions)2019 2018 2017
Revenues:           
Aflac Japan:           
   Net earned premiums:           
             Cancer $6,031
   $5,849
   $5,612
 
             Medical and other health 3,582
   3,516
   3,379
 
             Life insurance 3,159
   3,397
   3,761
 
   Net investment income, less amortized hedge costs (1),(2)
 2,496
   2,403
   2,235
 
   Other income 45
   41
   41
 
               Total Aflac Japan 15,313
   15,206
   15,028
 
Aflac U.S.:           
   Net earned premiums:           
             Accident/disability 2,665
   2,611
   2,537
 
             Cancer 1,309
   1,311
   1,308
 
             Other health 1,548
   1,508
   1,445
 
             Life insurance 286
   278
   273
 
   Net investment income 720
   727
   721
 
   Other income 22
   8
   5
 
           Total Aflac U.S. 6,550
   6,443
   6,289
 
Corporate and other (3)
 393
   339
   272
 
           Total adjusted revenues 22,256
   21,988
   21,589
 
Realized investment gains (losses) (1),(2),(3)
 51
   (230)   78
 
           Total revenues $22,307
   $21,758
   $21,667
 


104

(In millions)202220212020
Revenues:
Aflac Japan:
   Net earned premiums:
Cancer$4,791 $5,829 $6,119 
Medical and other health2,775 3,400 3,596 
Life insurance1,982 2,624 2,955 
   Adjusted net investment income (1),(2)
2,669 3,031 2,659 
   Other income35 41 42 
               Total adjusted revenue Aflac Japan12,252 14,925 15,371 
Aflac U.S.:
   Net earned premiums:
Accident1,314 1,362 1,449 
Disability1,171 1,162 1,165 
Critical care1,753 1,797 1,856 
Hospital indemnity722 730 747 
Dental/vision199 188 196 
Life insurance372 332 298 
Other39 43 47 
   Adjusted net investment income (3)
755 754 705 
   Other income161 121 102 
           Total adjusted revenue Aflac U.S.6,486 6,489 6,565 
Corporate and other (4), (5)
267 175 384 
           Total adjusted revenues19,005 21,589 22,320 
Net investment gains (losses) (1),(2),(3),(4)
497 517 (173)
           Total revenues$19,502 $22,106 $22,147 
(1) Amortized hedge costs of $257, $236$112, $76 and $228$206 in 2019, 20182022, 2021 and 2017,2020, respectively, related to certain foreign currency exposure management strategies have been reclassified from realizednet investment gains (losses) and reported as a deduction from net investment income when analyzing operations.
(2) Net interest cash flows from derivatives associated with certain investment strategies of $(17)$(86), $(33) and $9 in 20192022, 2021 and an immaterial amount in 20182020, respectively, have been reclassified from realizednet investment gains (losses) and included in adjusted earnings as a component of net investment income.income when analyzing operations.
(3) Net interest cash flows from derivatives associated with certain investment strategies of $(4), $2 and $3 in 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively, have been reclassified from net investment gains (losses) and included in adjusted earnings as a component of net investment income when analyzing operations.
(4) Amortized hedge income of $89$68, $57 and $97 in 20192022, 2021 and $36 in 20182020, respectively, related to certain foreign currency exposure management strategies has been reclassified from realizednet investment gains (losses) and reported as an increase to net investment income when analyzing operations.

(5) The change in value of federal historic rehabilitation and solar investments in partnerships of $91 and $138 in 2022 and 2021, respectively, is included as a reduction to net investment income. Tax credits on these investments of $83 and $115 in 2022 and 2021, respectively, have been recorded as an income tax benefit in the consolidated statement of earnings. See Note 3 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on these investments.

103


105


(In millions)2019 2018 2017
Pretax earnings:           
Aflac Japan (1),(2)
 $3,261
   $3,208
   $3,054
 
Aflac U.S. 1,272
   1,285
   1,245
 
Corporate and other (3),(4)
 (72)   (139)   (212) 
    Pretax adjusted earnings (5)
 4,461
   4,354
   4,087
 
Realized investment gains (losses) (1),(2),(3),(4)
 (15)   (297)   0
 
Other income (loss) (6)
 (1)
  (74)   (69)
    Total earnings before income taxes $4,445
   $3,983
   $4,018
 
Income taxes applicable to pretax adjusted earnings $1,147
   $1,129
   $1,370
 
Effect of foreign currency translation on after-tax
adjusted earnings
 15
   28
   (41) 

(In millions)202220212020
Pretax earnings:
Aflac Japan (1),(2)
$3,056 $3,754 $3,263 
Aflac U.S. (3)
1,324 1,478 1,268 
Corporate and other (4),(5),(6)
(223)(298)(115)
    Pretax adjusted earnings (7)
4,157 4,934 4,416 
Net investment gains (losses) (1),(2),(3),(4),(5)
447 462 (229)
Other income (loss)0 

(74)(28)

    Total earnings before income taxes$4,604 $5,322 $4,159 
Income taxes applicable to pretax adjusted earnings$760 $915 $864 
Effect of foreign currency translation on after-tax
  adjusted earnings
(215)(38)31 
(1) Amortized hedge costs of $257, $236$112, $76 and $228$206 in 2019, 20182022, 2021 and 2017,2020, respectively, related to certain foreign currency exposure management strategies have been reclassified from realizednet investment gains (losses) and reported as a deduction from net investment income when analyzing operations.
(2) Net interest cash flows from derivatives associated with certain investment strategies of $(17)$(86), $(33) and $9 in 20192022, 2021 and an immaterial amount in 20182020, respectively, have been reclassified from realizednet investment gains (losses) and included in adjusted earnings as a component of net investment income.income when analyzing operations.
(3) Net interest cash flows from derivatives associated with certain investment strategies of $(4), $2 and $3 in 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively, have been reclassified from net investment gains (losses) and included in adjusted earnings as a component of net investment income when analyzing operations.
(4) Amortized hedge income of $89$68, $57 and $97 in 20192022, 2021 and $36 in 20182020, respectively, related to certain foreign currency exposure management strategies has been reclassified from realizednet investment gains (losses) and reported as an increase to net investment income when analyzing operations.
(4) (5) A gain of $66 in 2019, $67 in 2018$50, $55 and $7756 in 2017,2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively, related to the interest rate component of the change in fair value of foreign currency swaps on notes payable havehas been reclassified from realizednet investment gains (losses) and included in adjusted earnings when analyzing operations.
(5)(6) The change in value of federal historic rehabilitation and solar investments in partnerships of $91 and $138 in 2022 and 2021, respectively, is included as a reduction to net investment income. Tax credits on these investments of $83 and $115 in 2022 and 2021, respectively, have been recorded as an income tax benefit in the consolidated statement of earnings. See Note 3 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on these investments.
(7) Includes $135, $122$167, $170 and $122$167 of interest expense on debt in 2019, 20182022, 2021 and 20172020, respectively.
(6)
Includes expense of $13 in 2017 for the early extinguishment of debt

Assets as of December 31 were as follows:
(In millions)20222021
Assets:
Aflac Japan$105,173 $128,536 
Aflac U.S.20,779 23,106 
Corporate and other5,065 5,900 
    Total assets$131,017 $157,542 
(In millions)2019 2018 
Assets:        
Aflac Japan $127,523
   $118,342
  
Aflac U.S. 20,945
   19,100
  
Corporate and other 4,300
   2,964
  
    Total assets $152,768
   $140,406
  


Yen-Translation Effects: The following table shows the yen/dollar exchange rates used for or during the periods ended December 31. Exchange effects were calculated using the same yen/dollar exchange rate for the current year as for each respective prior year.
 2019 2018 2017
Statements of Earnings:           
Weighted-average yen/dollar exchange rate (1)
 109.07
   110.39
   112.16
 
Yen percent strengthening (weakening) 1.2%   1.6%   (3.1)% 
Exchange effect on pretax adjusted earnings (in millions) $20
   $38
   $(63) 

202220212020
Statements of Earnings:
Weighted-average yen/dollar exchange rate (1)
130.17 109.79 106.86 
Yen percent strengthening (weakening)(15.7)%(2.7)%2.1 %
Exchange effect on pretax adjusted earnings (in millions)$(263)$(47)$38 
 2019 2018
Balance Sheets:       
Yen/dollar exchange rate at December 31(1)
 109.56
   111.00
 
Yen percent strengthening (weakening) 1.3%   1.8% 
Exchange effect on total assets (in millions) $1,225
   $1,362
 
Exchange effect on total liabilities (in millions) 1,533
   1,270
 


106

20222021
Balance Sheets:
Yen/dollar exchange rate at December 31(1)
132.70 115.02 
Yen percent strengthening (weakening)(13.3)%(10.0)%
Exchange effect on total assets (in millions)$(10,936)$(9,635)
Exchange effect on total liabilities (in millions)(9,589)(7,566)
(1) Rates are based on the published MUFG Bank, Ltd. telegraphic transfer middle rate (TTM)


104



Transfers of funds from Aflac Japan: Aflac Japan makes payments to the Parent Company for management fees allocated expenses and remittances of earnings. Prior to the Aflac Japan branch conversion on April 1, 2018, Aflac Japan paid allocated expenses and profit remittances to Aflac U.S. Information on transfers for each of the years ended December 31 is shown below. See Note 13 for information concerning restrictions on transfers from Aflac Japan.
(In millions)202220212020
Management fees$61 $59 $71 
Profit remittances2,412 2,138 1,215 
Total transfers from Aflac Japan$2,473 $2,197 $1,286 
(In millions)2019 2018 2017
Management fees $75
   $136
   $93
 
Allocated expenses 4
   24
   109
 
Profit remittances 2,070
   808
   1,150
 
Total transfers from Aflac Japan $2,149
   $968
   $1,352
 


Property and Equipment: The costs of buildings, furniture and equipment are depreciated principally on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives (maximum of 50 years for buildings and 20 years for furniture and equipment). Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred; expenditures for betterments are capitalized and depreciated. Classes of property and equipment as of December 31 were as follows:
(In millions)20222021
Property and equipment:
Land$168 $168 
Buildings437 491 
Equipment and furniture587 542 
Total property and equipment1,192 1,201 
Less accumulated depreciation662 663 
Net property and equipment$530 $538 
(In millions)2019 2018
Property and equipment:       
Land $168
   $168
 
Buildings 473
   456
 
Equipment and furniture 549
   400
 
Total property and equipment 1,190
   1,024
 
Less accumulated depreciation 609
   581
 
Net property and equipment $581
   $443
 


Receivables: Receivables consist primarily of monthly insurance premiums due from individual policyholders or their employers for payroll deduction of premiums, net of an allowance for doubtful accounts.current expected credit losses. At December 31, 2019, $2582022, $174 million, or 31.2%27.0% of total receivables, were related to Aflac Japan's operations, compared with $334$195 million, or 39.2%29.0%, at December 31, 2018.2021.


107

3.     INVESTMENTS
Net Investment Income

The components of net investment income for the years ended December 31 were as follows:
(In millions)202220212020
Fixed maturity securities$2,926 $3,068 $3,113 
Equity securities31 35 29 
Commercial mortgage and other loans716 570 545 
Other investments (1)
131 356 145 
Short-term investments and cash equivalents78 18 
Gross investment income3,882 4,036 3,850 
Less investment expenses226 218 212 
Net investment income$3,656 $3,818 $3,638 
(In millions)2019 2018 2017
Fixed maturity securities $3,141
   $3,142
   $3,173
 
Equity securities 37
   38
   42
 
Commercial mortgage and other loans 468
   333
   86
 
Other investments 53
   36
   8
 
Short-term investments and cash equivalents 56
   41
   25
 
Gross investment income 3,755
   3,590
   3,334
 
Less investment expenses 177
   148
   114
 
Net investment income $3,578
   $3,442
   $3,220
 

(1)
The change in value of federal historic rehabilitation and solar investments in partnerships of $91 in 2022 and $138 in 2021 is included as a reduction to net investment income. Tax credits on these investments of $83 in 2022 and $115 in 2021 have been recorded as an income tax benefit in the consolidated statement of earnings.


105



Investment Holdings
The amortized cost for the Company's investments in fixed maturity securities, the cost for equity securities and the fair values of these investments at December 31 are shown in the following tables.
  2022
(In millions)
Amortized
Cost
Allowance for Credit LossesGross
Unrealized
Gains
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
  Fair
  Value
Securities available for sale, carried at fair
  value through other comprehensive income:
Fixed maturity securities:
  Yen-denominated:
Japan government and agencies$25,418 $0 $1,259 $1,724 $24,953 
Municipalities1,034 0 124 61 1,097 
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities241 0 8 12 237 
Public utilities3,932 0 301 108 4,125 
Sovereign and supranational659 0 24 5 678 
Banks/financial institutions6,348 0 324 531 6,141 
Other corporate6,288 0 555 408 6,435 
Total yen-denominated43,920 0 2,595 2,849 43,666 
  U.S. dollar-denominated:
U.S. government and agencies169 0 0 8 161 
Municipalities1,269 0 43 89 1,223 
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities1,926 0 67 84 1,909 
Public utilities3,481 0 240 180 3,541 
Sovereign and supranational133 0 35 12 156 
Banks/financial institutions2,992 0 271 105 3,158 
Other corporate21,579 0 1,549 1,201 21,927 
Total U.S. dollar-denominated31,549 0 2,205 1,679 32,075 
Total securities available for sale$75,469 $0 $4,800 $4,528 $75,741 
  2019
(In millions)Cost or
Amortized
Cost
 Gross
Unrealized
Gains
 Gross
Unrealized
Losses
   Fair
  Value
Securities available for sale, carried at fair value
through other comprehensive income:
               
Fixed maturity securities:               
  Yen-denominated:               
Japan government and agencies $30,929
   $5,169
   $0
   $36,098
 
Municipalities 516
   116
   3
   629
 
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities 229
   25
   0
   254
 
Public utilities 1,855
   406
   0
   2,261
 
Sovereign and supranational 680
   50
   0
   730
 
Banks/financial institutions 6,152
   700
   86
   6,766
 
Other corporate 5,323
   944
   24
   6,243
 
Total yen-denominated 45,684
   7,410
   113
   52,981
 
  U.S. dollar-denominated:               
U.S. government and agencies 293
   9
   0
   302
 
Municipalities 1,077
   141
   0
   1,218
 
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities 149
   7
   0
   156
 
Public utilities 3,804
   725
   10
   4,519
 
Sovereign and supranational 239
   73
   0
   312
 
Banks/financial institutions 2,879
   646
   4
   3,521
 
Other corporate 25,246
   3,255
   248
   28,253
 
Total U.S. dollar-denominated 33,687
   4,856
   262
   38,281
 
Total securities available for sale $79,371
   $12,266
   $375
   $91,262
 







106


108


2021
(In millions)Amortized
Cost
Allowance for Credit LossesGross
Unrealized
Gains
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
  Value
Securities available for sale, carried at fair value
  through other comprehensive income:
Fixed maturity securities:
  Yen-denominated:
Japan government and agencies$30,335 $$3,343 $61 $33,617 
Municipalities1,192 322 1,509 
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities300 19 318 
Public utilities4,462 906 5,366 
Sovereign and supranational760 82 842 
Banks/financial institutions6,963 787 72 7,678 
Other corporate7,148 1,535 26 8,657 
Total yen-denominated51,160 6,994 167 57,987 
  U.S. dollar-denominated:
U.S. government and agencies196 203 
Municipalities1,340 189 1,527 
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities897 33 928 
Public utilities3,781 909 4,685 
Sovereign and supranational222 57 273 
Banks/financial institutions3,169 747 3,913 
Other corporate24,604 4,629 53 29,180 
Total U.S. dollar-denominated34,209 6,572 72 40,709 
Total securities available for sale$85,369 $$13,566 $239 $98,696 
 2018
(In millions)Cost or
Amortized
Cost
 Gross
Unrealized
Gains
 Gross
Unrealized
Losses
   Fair
  Value
Securities available for sale, carried at fair value
through other comprehensive income:
               
Fixed maturity securities:               
  Yen-denominated:               
Japan government and agencies $30,637
   $3,700
   $140
   $34,197
 
Municipalities 385
   32
   9
   408
 
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities 155
   22
   0
   177
 
Public utilities 1,732
   280
   4
   2,008
 
Sovereign and supranational 826
   123
   0
   949
 
Banks/financial institutions 5,440
   502
   238
   5,704
 
Other corporate 4,852
   649
   44
   5,457
 
Total yen-denominated 44,027
   5,308
   435
   48,900
 
  U.S dollar-denominated:               
U.S. government and agencies 137
   9
   1
   145
 
Municipalities 1,343
   120
   8
   1,455
 
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities 155
   8
   1
   162
 
Public utilities 4,772
   496
   105
   5,163
 
Sovereign and supranational 251
   60
   0
   311
 
Banks/financial institutions 2,860
   389
   35
   3,214
 
Other corporate 23,311
   1,343
   1,109
   23,545
 
Total U.S. dollar-denominated 32,829
   2,425
   1,259
   33,995
 
Total securities available for sale $76,856
   $7,733
   $1,694
   $82,895
 


  2022
(In millions)
Amortized
Cost
Allowance for Credit LossesNet Carrying AmountGross
Unrealized
Gains
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair  
Value  
Securities held to maturity, carried at
  amortized cost:
Fixed maturity securities:
  Yen-denominated:
Japan government and agencies$18,269 $2 $18,267 $2,045 $0 $20,312 
Municipalities287 0 287 48 0 335 
Public utilities38 1 37 4 0 41 
Sovereign and supranational450 4 446 54 0 500 
Other corporate19 0 19 3 0 22 
Total yen-denominated19,063 7 19,056 2,154 0 21,210 
Total securities held to maturity$19,063 $7 $19,056 $2,154 $0 $21,210 


  2019
(In millions)Cost or
Amortized
Cost
 Gross
Unrealized
Gains
 Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 Fair  
Value  
Securities held to maturity, carried at amortized cost:               
Fixed maturity securities:               
  Yen-denominated:               
Japan government and agencies $22,241
   $6,050
   $0
   $28,291
 
Municipalities 821
   262
   0
   1,083
 
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities 16
   1
   0
   17
 
Public utilities 2,535
   419
   0
   2,954
 
Sovereign and supranational 1,123
   197
   0
   1,320
 
Banks/financial institutions 916
   105
   3
   1,018
 
Other corporate 2,433
   485
   7
   2,911
 
Total yen-denominated 30,085
   7,519
   10
   37,594
 
Total securities held to maturity $30,085
   $7,519
   $10
   $37,594
 


109


107



  2021
(In millions)Amortized
Cost
Allowance for Credit LossesNet Carrying AmountGross
Unrealized
Gains
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair  
Value
Securities held to maturity, carried at
  amortized cost:
Fixed maturity securities:
  Yen-denominated:
Japan government and agencies$21,089 $$21,086 $4,613 $$25,699 
Municipalities335 335 101 436 
Public utilities44 43 12 55 
Sovereign and supranational518 514 136 650 
Other corporate22 22 29 
Total yen-denominated22,008 22,000 4,869 26,869 
Total securities held to maturity$22,008 $$22,000 $4,869 $$26,869 
  2018
(In millions)Cost or
Amortized
Cost
 Gross
Unrealized
Gains
 Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 Fair
Value
Securities held to maturity, carried at amortized cost:               
Fixed maturity securities:               
  Yen-denominated:               
Japan government and agencies $21,712
   $5,326
   $0
   $27,038
 
Municipalities 359
   110
   0
   469
 
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities 14
   1
   0
   15
 
Public utilities 2,727
   254
   8
   2,973
 
Sovereign and supranational 1,551
   289
   0
   1,840
 
Banks/financial institutions 1,445
   158
   20
   1,583
 
Other corporate 2,510
   332
   38
   2,804
 
Total yen-denominated 30,318
   6,470
   66
   36,722
 
Total securities held to maturity $30,318
   $6,470
   $66
   $36,722
 


  
20222021
(In millions)Fair ValueFair Value
Equity securities, carried at fair value through net earnings:
Equity securities:
      Yen-denominated$670 $744 
      U.S. dollar-denominated374 817 
      Other currencies47 42 
Total equity securities$1,091 $1,603 
  
2019 2018
(In millions)Fair Value Fair Value
Equity securities, carried at fair value through net earnings:       
Equity securities:       
      Yen-denominated $658
   $641
 
      U.S. dollar-denominated 144
   346
 
Total equity securities $802
   $987
 


The methods of determining the fair values of the Company's investments in fixed maturity securities and equity securities are described in Note 5.

During 20192022 and 2018,2021, the Company did not reclassify any investments from the held-to-maturity category to the available-for-sale category. During 2017,2020, as a result of the adoption of ASU 2019-04 discussed in Note 1, the Company reclassified 3 investments$6.9 billion (at amortized cost) of pre-payable fixed-maturity securities from the held-to-maturity category to the available-for-sale category ascategory. This reclassification resulted in recording in accumulated other comprehensive income a result of the issuers' credit rating being downgraded to below investment grade. At the time of the transfer, the securities had an aggregate amortized cost of $773 million and an aggregatenet unrealized gain of $47 million.

$848 million on an after-tax basis.
108


110


Contractual and Economic Maturities

The contractual and economic maturities of the Company's investments in fixed maturity securities at December 31, 2019,2022, were as follows:
(In millions)
Amortized
Cost (1)
Fair
Value
Available for sale:
Due in one year or less$1,777 $1,894 
Due after one year through five years6,806 7,080 
Due after five years through 10 years15,467 16,498 
Due after 10 years49,252 48,123 
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities2,167 2,146 
Total fixed maturity securities available for sale$75,469 $75,741 
Held to maturity:
Due in one year or less$$
Due after one year through five years40 42 
Due after five years through 10 years10,132 11,212 
Due after 10 years8,884 9,956 
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities
Total fixed maturity securities held to maturity$19,056 $21,210 
(In millions)Amortized
Cost
 Fair
Value
Available for sale:      
Due in one year or less $583
   $612
Due after one year through five years 7,933
   8,122
Due after five years through 10 years 11,347
   12,819
Due after 10 years 59,130
   69,299
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities 378
   410
Total fixed maturity securities available for sale $79,371
   $91,262
Held to maturity:      
Due in one year or less $265
   $270
Due after one year through five years 1,227
   1,330
Due after five years through 10 years 532
   599
Due after 10 years 28,045
   35,378
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities 16
   17
Total fixed maturity securities held to maturity $30,085
   $37,594
(1) Net of allowance for credit losses


Economic maturities are used for certain debt instruments with no stated maturity where the expected maturity date is based on the combination of features in the financial instrument such as the right to call or prepay obligations or changes in coupon rates.

Investment Concentrations

The Company's process for investing in credit-related investments begins with an independent approach to underwriting each issuer's fundamental credit quality. The Company evaluates independently those factors that it believes could influence an issuer's ability to make payments under the contractual terms of the Company's instruments. This includes a thorough analysis of a variety of items including the issuer's country of domicile (including political, legal, and financial considerations); the industry in which the issuer competes (with an analysis of industry structure, end-market dynamics, and regulation); company specific issues (such as management, assets, earnings, cash generation, and capital needs); and contractual provisions of the instrument (such as financial covenants and position in the capital structure). The Company further evaluates the investment considering broad business and portfolio management objectives, including asset/liability needs, portfolio diversification, and expected income.

Investment exposures that individually exceeded 10% of shareholders' equity as of December 31 were as follows:
2019 201820222021
(In millions)Credit
Rating
 Amortized
Cost
 Fair
Value
 Credit
Rating
 Amortized
Cost
 Fair
Value
(In millions)Credit
Rating
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
Credit
Rating
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
Japan National Government(1)
A+ $51,726 $62,584 A+ $51,207 $59,945
Japan National Government(1)
A+$42,618$44,178A+$50,186$57,862
(1)Japan Government Bonds (JGBs) or JGB-backed securities

Realized

Net Investment Gains and Losses

Information regarding pretax realizednet gains and losses from investments for the years ended December 31 follows:
follows:

109111



(In millions)202220212020
Net investment gains (losses):
Sales and redemptions:
Fixed maturity securities available for sale:
Gross gains from sales$93 $64 $31 
Gross losses from sales(78)(52)(47)
Foreign currency gains (losses)442 (69)
Other investments:
Gross gains from sales10 
Total sales and redemptions467 13 (85)
Equity securities(341)164 

184 
Credit losses:
Fixed maturity securities available for sale0 38 (38)
Fixed maturity securities held to maturity0 
Commercial mortgage and other loans(18)(93)
Impairment losses(25)(20)(49)
Loan commitments9 (21)
Reinsurance recoverables and other(2)(2)
Total credit losses(36)27 (200)
Derivatives and other:
Derivative gains (losses)(1,151)(805)399 
Foreign currency gains (losses)1,424 1,069 (568)
Total derivatives and other273 264 (169)
Total net investment gains (losses)$363 $468 $(270)
(In millions)2019 2018 2017 
Realized investment gains (losses):      
Fixed maturity securities:      
Available for sale:      
Gross gains from sales$115
 $101
 $51
 
Gross losses from sales(68) (156) (68) 
Foreign currency gains (losses) on sales and redemptions(16) 73
 (48) 
Other-than-temporary impairment losses(13) (64) (7) 
Total fixed maturity securities18
 (46) (72) 
Equity securities101
 (131)
71
(1) 
Loan receivables:      
Loan loss reserves(18) (19) (8) 
Total loan receivables(18) (19) (8) 
Derivatives and other:      
Derivative gains (losses)(174) (224) (109) 
Foreign currency gains (losses)(62) (10) (33) 
Total derivatives and other(236) (234) (142) 
Total realized investment gains (losses)$(135) $(430) $(151) 

(1) Includes impairments of $22 in 2017

The unrealized holding gains,losses, net of losses,gains, recorded as a component of realizednet investment gains and losses for the year ended December 31, 2019,2022, that relatesrelate to equity securities still held at the December 31, 2019,2022, reporting date was $64$340 million.

Unrealized Investment Gains and Losses

Information regarding changes in unrealized gains and losses from investments recorded in AOCI for the years ended December 31 follows:
(In millions)202220212020
Changes in unrealized gains (losses):
Fixed maturity securities, available for sale$(13,056)$(960)$2,399 
Total change in unrealized gains (losses)$(13,056)$(960)$2,399 
(In millions)2019 2018 2017
Changes in unrealized gains (losses):           
Fixed maturity securities, available for sale $5,852
   $(3,142)   $1,657
 
Equity securities 0
   0
   71
 
Total change in unrealized gains (losses) $5,852
   $(3,142)   $1,728
 


Effect on Shareholders' Equity

The net effect on shareholders' equity of unrealized gains and losses from fixed maturity securities at December 31 was as follows:
(In millions)20222021
Unrealized gains (losses) on securities available for sale$272 $13,330 
Deferred income taxes(974)(3,728)
Shareholders’ equity, unrealized gains (losses) on fixed maturity securities$(702)$9,602 
(In millions)2019 2018
Unrealized gains (losses) on securities available for sale $11,891
   $6,039
 
Deferred income taxes (3,343)   (1,805) 
Shareholders’ equity, unrealized gains (losses) on fixed maturity securities $8,548
   $4,234
 



112

Gross Unrealized Loss Aging

The following tables show the fair values and gross unrealized losses of the Company's available-for-sale and held-to-maturity investments, that were in an unrealized loss position, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at December 31.

  2022
  TotalLess than 12 months12 months or longer
(In millions)Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses
Fixed maturity securities available
   for sale:
  U.S. government and
      agencies:
  U.S. dollar-denominated$159 $8 $85 $3 $74 $5 
  Japan government and
      agencies:
  Yen-denominated8,856 1,724 3,733 580 5,123 1,144 
  Municipalities:
  U.S. dollar-denominated854 89 735 57 119 32 
  Yen-denominated286 61 150 26 136 35 
Mortgage- and asset-
    backed securities:
  U.S. dollar-denominated936 84 640 42 296 42 
  Yen-denominated62 12 38 6 24 6 
  Public utilities:
  U.S. dollar-denominated1,852 180 1,667 144 185 36 
  Yen-denominated880 108 576 61 304 47 
  Sovereign and supranational:
  U.S. dollar-denominated30 12 0 0 30 12 
  Yen-denominated71 5 34 4 37 1 
  Banks/financial institutions:
  U.S. dollar-denominated1,147 105 786 58 361 47 
  Yen-denominated3,957 531 1,760 174 2,197 357 
  Other corporate:
  U.S. dollar-denominated10,529 1,201 8,636 785 1,893 416 
  Yen-denominated2,090 408 1,507 273 583 135 
  Total$31,709 $4,528 $20,347 $2,213 $11,362 $2,315 
110


113


  2021
  TotalLess than 12 months12 months or longer
(In millions)Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses
Fixed maturity securities available
   for sale:
  U.S. government and
      agencies:
  U.S. dollar-denominated$$$$$$
  Japan government and
      agencies:
  Yen-denominated2,868 61 445 2,423 58 
  Municipalities:
  U.S. dollar-denominated82 79 
  Yen-denominated187 53 134 
Mortgage- and asset-
    backed securities:
  U.S. dollar-denominated278 278 
  Yen-denominated33 33 
  Public utilities:
  U.S. dollar-denominated130 70 60 
  Yen-denominated26 26 
  Sovereign and supranational:
  U.S. dollar-denominated37 31 
  Banks/financial institutions:
  U.S. dollar-denominated292 274 18 
  Yen-denominated2,074 72 1,011 16 1,063 56 
  Other corporate:
  U.S. dollar-denominated1,365 53 458 907 45 
  Yen-denominated541 26 274 267 22 
  Total$7,914 $239 $2,948 $42 $4,966 $197 
  2019
  Total Less than 12 months 12 months or longer
(In millions)Fair
Value
 Unrealized
Losses
 Fair
Value
 Unrealized
Losses
 Fair
Value
 Unrealized
Losses
Fixed maturity securities:                       
  Municipalities:                       
  Yen-denominated $80
   $3
   $80
   $3
   $0
   $0
 
  Public utilities:                       
  U.S. dollar-denominated 306
   10
   69
   2
   237
   8
 
  Banks/financial institutions:                       
  U.S. dollar-denominated 79
   4
   18
   0
   61
   4
 
  Yen-denominated 1,828
   89
   1,828
   89
   0
   0
 
  Other corporate:                       
  U.S. dollar-denominated 4,261
   248
   792
   53
   3,469
   195
 
  Yen-denominated 636
   31
   636
   31
   0
   0
 
  Total $7,190
   $385
   $3,423
   $178
   $3,767
   $207
 


  2018
  Total Less than 12 months 12 months or longer
(In millions)Fair
Value
 Unrealized
Losses
 Fair
Value
 Unrealized
Losses
 Fair
Value
 Unrealized
Losses
Fixed maturity securities:                       
  U.S. government and
agencies:
                       
  U.S. dollar-denominated $67
   $1
   $67
   $1
   $0
   $0
 
  Japan government and
agencies:
                       
  Yen-denominated 3,604
   140
   3,604
   140
   0
   0
 
  Municipalities:                       
  U.S. dollar-denominated 515
   8
   515
   8
   0
   0
 
  Yen-denominated 148
   9
   148
   9
   0
   0
 
Mortgage- and asset-
backed securities:
                       
  U.S. dollar-denominated 74
   1
   74
   1
   0
   0
 
  Public utilities:                       
  U.S. dollar-denominated 1,585
   105
   892
   48
   693
   57
 
  Yen-denominated 604
   12
   604
   12
   0
   0
 
  Banks/financial institutions:                       
  U.S. dollar-denominated 625
   35
   340
   19
   285
   16
 
  Yen-denominated 3,057
   258
   3,057
   258
   0
   0
 
  Other corporate:                       
  U.S. dollar-denominated 12,899
   1,109
   5,782
   407
   7,117
   702
 
  Yen-denominated 1,306
   82
   1,306
   82
   0
   0
 
  Total $24,484
   $1,760
   $16,389
   $985
   $8,095
   $775
 


Analysis of Securities in Unrealized Loss Positions

The unrealized losses on the Company's fixed maturity securities investments have been primarily related to general market changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and/or the levels of credit spreads rather than specific concerns with the issuer's ability to pay interest and repay principal.


111



allocate the Company‘s resources to securities with real credit-related concerns that could impact ultimate collection of principal and interest. For any significant declines in fair value of its fixed maturity securities,determined to be non-interest rate or market related, the Company performs a more focused review of the related issuers' specific credit profile.

For corporate issuers, the Company evaluates their assets, business profile including industry dynamics and competitive positioning, financial statements and other available financial data. For non-corporate issuers, the Company analyzes all sources of credit support, including issuer-specific factors. The Company utilizes information available in the public domain and, for certain private placement issuers, from consultations with the issuers directly. The Company also considers ratings from Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations (NRSROs), as well as the specific characteristics of the security it owns including seniority in the issuer's capital structure, covenant protections, or other relevant features. From these reviews, the Company evaluates the issuers' continued ability to service the Company's investment through payment of interest and principal.



114

Assuming no credit-related factors develop, unrealized gains and losses on fixed maturity securities are expected to diminish as investments near maturity. Based on its credit analysis, the Company believes that the issuers of its fixed maturity investments in the sectors shown in the table above have the ability to service their obligations to the Company.Company, and the Company does not intend to sell the investments and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the investments before recovery of their amortized cost bases, which may be at maturity.

However, from time to time the Company identifies certain available-for-sale fixed maturity securities where the amortized cost basis exceeds the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected due to credit related factors and as a result, a credit allowance will be estimated. Refer to the Allowance for Credit Losses section below for additional information.

Commercial Mortgage and Other Loans

The Company classifies its TREs, CMLs and MMLs as held-for-investment and includes them in the commercial mortgage and other loans line on the consolidated balance sheets. The Company carries them on the balance sheet at amortized cost less an estimated allowance for loancredit losses.

The following table below reflects the composition of the carrying value for commercial mortgage and other loans by property type as of December 31.
(In millions)20222021
Amortized Cost% of TotalAmortized Cost% of Total
Commercial Mortgage and other loans
  Transitional real estate loans:
    Office$2,158 15.8 %$2,001 16.7 %
    Retail493 3.6 267 2.2 
    Apartments/Multi-Family2,701 19.7 1,893 15.8 
    Industrial123 .9 94 .8 
    Hospitality803 5.9 876 7.3 
    Other231 1.7 228 1.9 
        Total transitional real estate loans6,509 47.6 5,359 44.7 
Commercial mortgage loans:
     Office388 2.8 398 3.3 
     Retail310 2.3 332 2.8 
     Apartments/Multi-Family630 4.6 649 5.4 
     Industrial694 5.1 525 4.4 
        Total commercial mortgage loans2,022 14.8 1,904 15.9 
Middle market loans5,157 37.6 4,697 39.4 
        Total commercial mortgage and other loans$13,688 100.0 %$11,960 100.0 %
Allowance for credit losses(192)(174)
              Total net commercial mortgage and other loans$13,496 $11,786 
(In millions)2019 2018
 Amortized Cost % of Total Amortized Cost % of Total
Commercial Mortgage and other loans       
  Transitional real estate loans:       
    Office$1,800
 18.7% $1,621
 23.3%
    Retail131
 1.4
 147
 2.1
    Apartments/Multi-Family2,085
 21.7
 1,706
 24.6
    Industrial256
 2.7
 250
 3.6
    Hospitality1,036
 10.8
 531
 7.6
    Other164
 1.7
 139
 2.0
        Total transitional real estate loans5,472
 57.0
 4,394
 63.2
Commercial mortgage loans:       
     Office410
 4.3
 281
 4.1
     Retail348
 3.5
 316
 4.6
     Apartments/Multi-Family569
 5.9
 369
 5.3
     Industrial383
 4.0
 99
 1.4
        Total commercial mortgage loans1,710
 17.7
 1,065
 15.4
Middle market loans2,432
 25.3
 1,487
 21.4
        Total commercial mortgage and other loans$9,614
 100.0% $6,946
 100.0%
Allowance for Loan Losses(45)   (27)  
              Total net commercial mortgage and other loans$9,569
   $6,919
  


Commercial mortgageCMLs and transitional real estate loansTREs were secured by properties entirely within the U.S. (with the largest concentrations in California (20%(22%), Texas (15%(12%) and Florida (10%)). Middle market loansMMLs are issued only to companies domiciled within the U.S. and Canada.


112



Transitional Real Estate Loans

Transitional real estate loansTREs are commercial mortgage loans that are typically relatively short-term floating rate instruments secured by a first lien on the property.Theseproperty. These loans provide funding for properties undergoing a change in their physical characteristics and/or economic profile and do not typically require any principal repayment prior to the maturity date. This loan portfolio is generally considered to be investment grade. As of December 31, 2019,2022, the Company had $875$811 millionin outstanding commitments to fund transitional real estate loans.TREs. These commitments are contingent on the final underwriting and due diligence to be performed.



115

Commercial Mortgage Loans

Commercial mortgage loansCMLs are typically fixed rate loans on commercial real estate with partial repayment of principal over the life of the loan with the remaining outstanding principal being repaid upon maturity. This loan portfolio is generally considered higher quality investment grade loans. As of December 31, 2019, the Company had $27 million of outstanding commitments to fund commercial mortgage loans. These commitments are contingent on the final underwriting and due diligence to be performed.

Middle Market Loans

Middle market loansMMLs are typically first lien senior secured cash flow loans to small to mid-size companies for working capital, refinancing, acquisition, and recapitalization. These loans are generally considered to be below investment grade. The carrying value for middle market loansMMLs included $99$28 million and $56$11 million for a short term credit facility that is reflected in other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets, as of December 31, 2019,2022, and 2018,2021, respectively.

As of December 31, 2019,2022, the Company had commitments of approximately $502$771 million to fund potential future loan originations related to this investment program.MMLs. These commitments are contingent upon the availability of middle market loansMMLs that meet the Company's underwriting criteria.

Allowance for Loan Losses

The Company's allowance for loan losses is established using both general and specific allowances. The general allowance is used for loans grouped by similar risk characteristics where a loan-specific or market-specific risk has not been identified, but for which the Company estimates probable incurred losses. The specific allowance is used on an individual loan basis when it is probable that a loss has been incurred. As of December 31, 2019, the Company had loan loss reserves of $6 million related to 2 specific middle market loans. There was no specific loan loss reserve as of December 31, 2018. The following table presents the rollforward of the Company's allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment during the year ended December 31.
(In millions)Commercial Mortgage Loans Transitional Real Estate Loans Middle Market Loans Total
Allowance for loan losses at December 31, 2018 $(1)   $(17)   $(9)   $(27) 
Addition to (release of) allowance for credit losses (2)   (5)   (11)   (18) 
Allowance for loan losses at December 31, 2019 $(3)   $(22)   $(20)   $(45) 


As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company had no loans that were past due in regards to principal and/or interest payments. Additionally, the Company held no loans that were on nonaccrual status or considered impaired as of December 31, 2019 and 2018. The Company had no troubled debt restructurings during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.

Credit Quality Indicators

TheFor TREs, the Company’s key credit quality indicators used by the Company in establishing the general and specific loan loss reserves, as well as in determining whether or not a loan should be impaired, includeindicator is loan-to-value and debt service coverage ratios for CMLs and TREs and ratings for its middle market loan portfolio.(LTV). Given that transitional real estateTRE loans involve properties undergoing renovation or construction, loan-to-value provides the most insight oninto the credit risk of the property. Middle market loans generally have below-investment-grade ratings.loan. The Company monitors the performance of the loans are monitored and reviewed periodically, but not less frequently than quarterly.

The table below summarizesFor CMLs, the Company’s key credit quality informationindicators include LTV and debt service coverage ratios (DSCR). LTV is calculated by carrying value for CMLsdividing the current outstanding loan balance by the most recent estimated property value. DSCR is the most recently available operating income of the underlying property compared to the required debt service of the loan.

For MMLs and TREs asheld-to-maturity fixed maturity securities, the Company’s key credit quality indicator is credit ratings. The Company’s held-to-maturity portfolio is composed of investment grade securities that are senior unsecured instruments, while its MMLs generally have below-investment-grade ratings but are typically senior secured instruments. The Company monitors the credit ratings periodically, but not less frequently than quarterly.

For the Company’s reinsurance recoverable balance, the key credit quality indicator is the credit rating of the Company’s reinsurance counterparty. The Company uses external credit ratings focused on the reinsurer’s financial strength and credit worthiness. As of December 31.31, 2022, the Company's reinsurance counterparties are rated A+. The Company monitors the credit ratings periodically, but not less frequently than quarterly.

113


116


The following tables present as of December 31, 2022 the amortized cost basis of TREs, CMLs and MMLs by year of origination and credit quality indicator.
Transitional Real Estate Loans
(In millions)20222021202020192018PriorTotal
Loan-to-Value Ratio:
0%-59.99%$532 $596 $36 $153 $61 $$1,378 
60%-69.99%679 769 138 485 425 50 2,546 
70%-79.99%787 940 97 389 146 2,360 
80% or greater64 161 225 
Total$2,062 $2,466 $271 $1,027 $632 $51 $6,509 
 2019
(In millions)Transitional Real Estate LoansCommercial Mortgage LoansTotal
Loan-to-Value Ratio:   
   0%-59.99%$1,424
$1,390
$2,814
   60%-69.99%1,9272972,224
   70%-79.99%2,085232,108
   80% or greater36036
      Total$5,472
$1,710
$7,182
Weighted Average Debt-Service Coverage Ratio 2.38 

 2018
(In millions)Transitional Real Estate LoansCommercial Mortgage LoansTotal
Loan-to-Value Ratio:   
   0%-59.99%$819
$877
$1,696
   60%-69.99%1,6811651,846
   70%-79.99%1,558231,581
   80% or greater3360336
      Total$4,394
$1,065
$5,459
Weighted Average Debt-Service Coverage Ratio 2.45 

Commercial Mortgage Loans
(In millions)20222021202020192018PriorTotalWeighted-Average DSCR
Loan-to-Value Ratio:
0%-59.99%$228 $310 $46 $510 $151 $492 $1,737 2.16
60%-69.99%15 46 135 196 2.03
70%-79.99%40 24 64 2.21
80% or greater25 25 1.41
Total$228 $325 $46 $596 $151 $676 $2,022 2.14
Weighted Average DSCR0.002.831.922.502.022.26

Middle Market Loans
(In millions)20222021202020192018PriorRevolving LoansTotal
Credit Ratings:
BBB$63 $144 $70 $37 $19 $$133 $466 
BB333 451 300 203 80 44 362 1,773 
B252 678 411 483 240 218 311 2,593 
CCC15 20 85 59 78 53 310 
CC14 15 
C and lower
Total$648 $1,288 $801 $808 $412 $340 $860 $5,157 

Allowance for Credit Losses

The Company calculates its allowance for credit losses for held-to-maturity fixed maturity securities, loan receivables, loan commitments and reinsurance recoverable by grouping assets with similar risk characteristics when there is not a specific expectation of a loss for an individual asset. For held-to-maturity fixed maturity securities, MMLs, and MML commitments, the Company groups assets by credit ratings, industry, and country. The Company groups CMLs and TREs and respective loan commitments by property type, property location and the property’s LTV and DSCR. The credit allowance for the reinsurance recoverable balance is estimated using a probability-of-default (PD) / loss-given-default (LGD) method.

The credit allowance for held-to-maturity fixed maturity securities and loan receivables is estimated using a PD / LGD method, discounted for the time value of money. For held-to-maturity fixed maturity securities, available-for-sale fixed maturity securities and loan receivables, the Company includes the change in present value due to the passage of time in the change in the allowance for credit losses. The Company’s methodology for estimating credit losses utilizes the contractual maturity date of the financial asset, adjusted when necessary to reflect the expected timing of repayment (such as prepayment options, renewal options, call options, or extension options). The Company applies reasonable and supportable forecasts of macroeconomic variables that impact the determination of PD/LGD over a two-year period for held-to-maturity fixed maturity securities and MMLs. The Company reverts to historical loss information over one year,


117

following the two-year forecast period. For the CML and TRE portfolio, the Company applies reasonable and supportable forecasts of macroeconomic variables as well as national and local real-estate market factors to estimate future credit losses where the market factors revert back to historical levels over time with the period being dependent on current market conditions, projected market conditions and difference in the current and historical market levels for each factor. The Company continuously monitors the estimation methodology, due to changes in portfolio composition, changes in underwriting practices and significant events or conditions and makes adjustments as necessary.

The Company’s held-to-maturity fixed maturity portfolio includes Japan Government and Agency securities of $18.1 billion amortized cost as of December 31, 2022 that meet the requirements for zero-credit-loss expectation and therefore these asset classes have been excluded from the current expected credit loss measurement.

An investment in an available-for-sale fixed maturity security may be impaired if the fair value falls below amortized cost. The Company regularly reviews its fixed maturity security investments portfolio for declines in fair value. The Company's debt impairment model focuses on the ultimate collection of the cash flows from its investments and whether the Company has the intent to sell or if it is more likely than not the Company would be required to sell the security prior to recovery of its amortized cost. The determination of the amount of impairments under this model is based upon the Company's periodic evaluation and assessment of known and inherent risks associated with the respective securities. Such evaluations and assessments are revised as conditions change and new information becomes available.

When determining the Company's intention to sell a security prior to recovery of its fair value to amortized cost, the Company evaluates facts and circumstances such as, but not limited to, future cash flow needs, decisions to reposition its security portfolio, and risk profile of individual investment holdings. The Company performs ongoing analyses of its liquidity needs, which includes cash flow testing of its policy liabilities, debt maturities, projected dividend payments, and other cash flow and liquidity needs.

The Company’s methodology for estimating credit losses for available-for-sale fixed maturity securities utilizes the discounted cash flow model, based on past events, current market conditions and future economic conditions, as well as industry analysis and credit ratings of the fixed maturity securities. In addition, the Company evaluates the specific issuer’s probability of default and expected recovery of its position in the event of default based on the underlying financial condition and assets of the borrower as well as seniority and/or security of other debt holders in the issuer when developing management’s best estimate of expected cash flows.

The Company granted certain loan modifications in its MML and TRE portfolios during the year ended December 31, 2022. As of December 31, 2022 these loan modifications did not have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations.

The Company had no troubled debt restructurings (TDRs) during the years ended December 31, 2022, and 2021.

The Company designates nonaccrual status for a nonperforming debt security or a loan that is not generating its stated interest rate because of nonpayment of periodic interest by the borrower. The Company applies the cash basis method to record any payments received on non-accrual assets. The Company resumes the accrual of interest on fixed maturity securities and loans that are currently making contractual payments or for those that are not current where the borrower has paid timely (less than 30 days outstanding).

As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the Company had an immaterial amount of loans and fixed maturity securities on nonaccrual status.

The following table presents the roll forward of the allowance for credit losses by portfolio segment for the years ended December 31.



118

(In millions)Transitional Real Estate LoansCommercial Mortgage LoansMiddle Market LoansHeld to Maturity SecuritiesAvailable for Sale SecuritiesReinsurance Recoverables
Balance at December 31, 2019 (1)
$(22)$(3)$(20)$$$
Transition impact to retained earnings(2)(8)(33)(10)(11)
(Addition to) release of allowance for credit
  losses
(39)(21)(41)(75)(1)
Write-offs, net of recoveries37 
Balance at December 31, 2020(63)(32)(85)(10)(38)(12)
(Addition to) release of allowance for credit
  losses
(5)22 (11)26 (2)
Write-offs, net of recoveries12 
Change in foreign exchange
Balance at December 31, 2021(68)(10)(96)(8)(13)
(Addition to) release of allowance for credit
  losses
14 (39)
Write-offs, net of recoveries
Change in foreign exchange
Balance at December 31, 2022$(54)$(9)$(129)$(7)$$(8)
(1) U.S. GAAP guidance adopted as of January 1, 2020 has superseded these losses, included for comparative purposes only.

For assets that are subject to the credit loss measurement, the change in credit loss allowance will be significantly impacted by purchases and sales in those assets during the period as well as entering into new non-cancelable loan commitments. The estimate of credit losses for loan commitments was $24 million and $31 million as of December 31, 2022, and 2021, respectively.

Other Investments

The table below reflects the composition of the carrying value for other investments as of December 31.
(In millions)2019 2018(In millions)20222021
Other investments:     Other investments:
Policy loans $250
 $232
 Policy loans$214 $236 
Short-term investments (1)
 628
 152
 
Short-term investments (1)
1,532 1,726 
Limited partnerships 569
 377
 Limited partnerships2,290 1,858 
Other 30
 26
 Other34 22 
Total other investments $1,477
 $787
 Total other investments$4,070 $3,842 
(1) Includes securities lending collateral

The Parent Company invests in partnerships that specialize in rehabilitating historic structures or the installation of solar equipment in order to receive federal historic rehabilitation and solar tax credits. These investments are classified as limited partnerships and included in other investments in the consolidated balance sheet. The change in value of each investment is recorded as a reduction to net investment income. Tax credits generated by these investments are recorded as an income tax benefit in the consolidated statement of earnings.

As of December 31, 2019,2022, the Company had $1.3$2.1 billion in outstanding commitments to fund alternative investments in limited partnerships.

Variable Interest Entities (VIEs)

As a condition of its involvement or investment in a VIE, the Company enters into certain protective rights and covenants that preclude changes in the structure of the VIE that would alter the creditworthiness of the Company's investment or its beneficial interest in the VIE.

For those VIEs other than certain unit trust structures, the Company's involvement is passive in nature. The Company hasis not, nor has it been, required to purchase any securities issued in the future by these VIEs.



119

The Company's ownership interest in VIEs is limited to holding the obligations issued by them. The Company has no direct or contingent obligations to fund the limited activities of these VIEs, nor does it have any direct or indirect financial guarantees related to the limited activities of these VIEs. The Company has not provided any assistance or any other type of financing support to any of the VIEs it invests in, nor does it have any intention to do so in the future. For those VIEs in

114



which the Company holds debt obligations, the weighted-average lives of the Company's notes are very similar to the underlying collateral held by these VIEs where applicable.

The Company's risk of loss related to its interests in any of its VIEs is limited to the carrying value of the related investments held in the VIE.

VIEs - Consolidated

The following table presents the cost or amortized cost, fair value and balance sheet caption in which the assets and liabilities of consolidated VIEs are reported as of December 31.
Investments in Consolidated Variable Interest Entities
  20222021
(In millions)
Amortized
Cost (1)
Fair
Value
Amortized
Cost (1)
Fair
Value
Assets:
Fixed maturity securities, available for sale$3,223 $3,805 $3,264 $4,490 
Commercial mortgage and other loans10,832 10,762 9,740 9,910 
Other investments (2)
1,909 1,909 1,535 1,535 
Other assets (3)
62 62 78 78 
Total assets of consolidated VIEs$16,026 $16,538 $14,617 $16,013 
Liabilities:
Other liabilities (3)
$390 $390 $414 $414 
Total liabilities of consolidated VIEs$390 $390 $414 $414 
  2019 2018
(In millions)Cost or Amortized
Cost
 Fair
Value
 Cost or Amortized
Cost
 Fair
Value
Assets:               
Fixed maturity securities, available for sale $3,308
   $4,312
   $3,849
   $4,466
 
Equity securities 0
   0
   160
   160
 
Commercial mortgage and other loans 7,956
   8,015
   5,528
   5,506
 
Other investments (1)
 494
   494
   328
   328
 
Other assets (2)
 169
   169
   182
   182
 
Total assets of consolidated VIEs $11,927
   $12,990
   $10,047
   $10,642
 
Liabilities:               
Other liabilities (2)
 $126
   $126
   $102
   $102
 
Total liabilities of consolidated VIEs $126
   $126
   $102
   $102
 

(1)
Net of allowance for credit losses
(1) (2) Consists entirely of alternative investments in limited partnerships
(2) (3) Consists entirely of derivatives

The Company is substantively the only investor in the consolidated VIEs listed in the table above. As the sole investor in these VIEs, the Company has the power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity that most significantly impact the entity's economic performance and is therefore considered to be the primary beneficiary of the VIEs that it consolidates. The Company also participates in substantially all of the variability created by these VIEs. The activities of these VIEs are limited to holding invested assets and foreign currency swaps, as appropriate, and utilizing the cash flows from these securities to service its investment. Neither the Company nor any of its creditors are able to obtain the underlying collateral of the VIEs unless there is an event of default or other specified event. For those VIEs that contain a swap, the Company is not a direct counterparty to the swap contracts and has no control over them. The Company's loss exposure to these VIEs is limited to its original investment. The Company's consolidated VIEs do not rely on outside or ongoing sources of funding to support their activities beyond the underlying collateral and swap contracts, if applicable. With the exception of its investment in unit trust structures, the underlying collateral assets and funding of the Company's consolidated VIEs are generally static in nature.

Investments in Unit Trust Structures

The Company also utilizes unit trust structures in its Aflac Japan segment to invest in various asset classes. As the sole investor of these VIEs, the Company is required to consolidate these trusts under U.S. GAAP.

VIEs - Not Consolidated

The table below reflects the amortized cost, fair value and balance sheet caption in which the Company's investment in VIEs not consolidated are reported as of December 31.


115


120


Investments in Variable Interest Entities Not Consolidated
 2019 2018
(In millions)Amortized
Cost
 Fair
Value
 Amortized
Cost
 Fair
Value
Assets:               
Fixed maturity securities, available for sale $4,129
   $4,884
   $4,575
   $4,982
 
Fixed maturity securities, held to maturity 1,848
   2,236
   2,007
   2,254
 
Other investments (1)
 75
   74
   49
   49
 
Total investments in VIEs not consolidated $6,052
   $7,194
   $6,631
   $7,285
 

20222021
(In millions)Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
Assets:
Fixed maturity securities, available for sale$3,998 $4,259 $4,779 $5,864 
Other investments (1)
381 381 323 323 
Total investments in VIEs not consolidated$4,379 $4,640 $5,102 $6,187 
(1) Consists entirely of alternative investments in limited partnerships

The Company holds alternative investments in limited partnerships that have been determined to be VIEs. These partnerships invest in private equity and structured investments. The Company’s maximum exposure to loss on these investments is limited to the amount of its investment. The Company is not the primary beneficiary of these VIEs and is therefore not required to consolidate them. The Company classifies these investments as Other investments in the consolidated balance sheets.

Certain investments in VIEs that the Company is not required to consolidate are investments that are in the form of debt obligations from the VIEs that are irrevocably and unconditionally guaranteed by their corporate parents or sponsors. These VIEs are the primary financing vehicles used by their corporate sponsors to raise financing in the capital markets. The variable interests created by these VIEs are principally or solely a result of the debt instruments issued by them. The Company does not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity's economic performance, nor does it have the obligation to absorb losses of the entity or the right to receive benefits from the entity. As such, the Company is not the primary beneficiary of these VIEs and is therefore not required to consolidate them.

The Company holds alternative investments in limited partnerships that have been determined to be VIEs. These partnerships invest in private equity and structured investments. The Company’s maximum exposure to loss on these investments is limited to the amount of its investment. The Company is not the primary beneficiary of these VIEs and is therefore not required to consolidate them. The Company classifies these investments as Other investments in the consolidated balance sheets.

Securities Lending and Pledged Securities

The Company lends fixed maturity and public equity securities to financial institutions in short-term security-lending transactions. These short-term security-lending arrangements increase investment income with minimal risk. The Company receives cash or other securities as collateral for such loans. The Company's security lending policy requires that the fair value of the securities received as collateral be 102% or more of the fair value of the loaned securities and that unrestricted cash received as collateral be 100% or more of the fair value of the loaned securities. The securities loaned continue to be carried as investment assets on the Company's balance sheet during the terms of the loans and are not reported as sales. For loans involving unrestricted cash or securities as collateral, the collateral is reported as an asset with a corresponding liability for the return of the collateral. For loans where the Company receives as collateral securities that the Company is not permitted to sell or repledge, the collateral is not reflected on the consolidated financial statements.


116


121


Details of collateral by loaned security type and remaining maturity of the agreements as of December 31 were as follows:
Securities Lending Transactions Accounted for as Secured BorrowingsSecurities Lending Transactions Accounted for as Secured BorrowingsSecurities Lending Transactions Accounted for as Secured Borrowings
2019
Remaining Contractual Maturity of the AgreementsRemaining Contractual Maturity of the AgreementsRemaining Contractual Maturity of the Agreements
20222021
(In millions)
Overnight
and
Continuous
(1)
 Up to 30
days
 Greater
than 90
days
 Total(In millions)
Overnight
and
Continuous
(1)
Up to 30
days
Total
Overnight
and
Continuous
(1)
Up to 30
days
Total
Securities lending transactions:       Securities lending transactions:
Fixed maturity securities:       Fixed maturity securities:
Japan government and agencies$0
 $1,013
 $4,759
 $5,772
Japan government and
agencies
$0 $1,087 $1,087 $$920 $920 
Public utilities35
 0
 0
 35
Public utilities12 0 12 40 40 
Sovereign and supranational2
 0
 0
 2
Sovereign and supranational0 0 0 
Banks/financial institutions48
 0
 0
 48
Banks/financial institutions89 0 89 88 88 
Other corporate778
 0
 0
 778
Other corporate621 0 621 1,112 1,112 
Equity securities0
 0
��0
 0
Total borrowings$863
 $1,013
 $4,759
 $6,635
Total borrowings$722 $1,087 $1,809 $1,242 $920 $2,162 
Gross amount of recognized liabilities for securities lending transactionsGross amount of recognized liabilities for securities lending transactions  $1,876
Gross amount of recognized liabilities for securities
lending transactions
$1,809 $2,162 
Amounts related to agreements not included in offsetting disclosure in Note 4  $4,759
(1) The related loaned security, under the Company's Aflac U.S. securities lending program, can be returned to the Company at the transferee's discretion; therefore, they are classified as Overnight and Continuous.
Securities Lending Transactions Accounted for as Secured Borrowings
2018
Remaining Contractual Maturity of the Agreements
(In millions)
Overnight
and
Continuous
(1)
 Up to 30
days
 Greater
than 90
days
 Total
Securities lending transactions:       
Fixed maturity securities:       
Japan government and agencies$0
 $387
 1,190
 $1,577
Municipalities5
 0
 0
 5
Public utilities27
 0
 0
 27
Banks/financial institutions74
 0
 0
 74
Other corporate549
 0
 0
 549
Equity securities10
 0
 0
 10
          Total borrowings$665
 $387
 $1,190
 $2,242
Gross amount of recognized liabilities for securities lending transactions  $1,052
Amounts related to agreements not included in offsetting disclosure in Note 4  $1,190

(1) The related loaned security, under the Company's Aflac U.S.In connection with securities lending, program, can be returnedin addition to cash collateral received, the Company received from counterparties securities collateral of $6.8 billion at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, which may not be sold or re-pledged, unless the transferee's discretion; therefore, they are classified as Overnight and Continuouscounterparty is in default. Such securities collateral is not reflected on the consolidated financial statements.

The Company did not have any repurchase agreements or repurchase-to-maturity transactions outstanding as of December 31, 20192022 and 2018,2021, respectively.

Certain fixed maturity securities can be pledged as collateral as part of derivative transactions, or pledged to support state deposit requirements on certain investment programs. For additional information regarding pledged securities related to derivative transactions, see Note 4.

At December 31, 2019,2022, debt securities with a fair value of $18$15 million were on deposit with regulatory authorities in the U.S. (including U.S. territories). The Company retains ownership of all securities on deposit and receives the related investment income.


117



For general information regarding the Company's investment accounting policies, see Note 1.

4.      DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS
The Company's freestanding derivative financial instruments have historically consisted of:
foreign currency forwards and options used in hedging foreign exchange risk on U.S. dollar-denominated investments in Aflac Japan's portfolio, with options used on a standalone basis and/or in a collar strategy;

foreign currency forwards and options used to economically hedge certain portions of forecasted cash flows denominated in yen and hedge the Company's long term exposure to a weakening yenyen;

cross-currency interest rate swaps, also referred to as foreign currency swaps, associated with certain senior notes and subordinated debenturesdebentures;

foreign currency swaps and, in prior periods, credit default swaps that are associated with VIE bond purchase commitments, and investments in special-purpose entities, including VIEs where the Company is the primary beneficiarybeneficiary;

interest rate swaps used to economically hedge interest rate fluctuations in certain variable-rate investmentsinvestments;

interest rate swaptions used to hedge changes in the fair value associated with interest rate fluctuations for certain U.S. dollar-denominated available-for-sale fixed-maturity securities.securities; and

bond purchase commitments at the inception of investments in consolidated VIEs.


122


Some of the Company's derivatives are designated as cash flow hedges, fair value hedges or net investment hedges; however, other derivatives do not qualify for hedge accounting or the Company elects not to designate them as accounting hedges.

Derivative Types

Foreign currency forwards and options are executed for the Aflac Japan segment in order to hedge the currency risk on the carrying value of certain U.S. dollar-denominated investments. The average maturity of these forwards and options can change depending on factors such as market conditions and types of investments being held. In situations where the maturity of the forwards and options is shorter than the underlying investment being hedged, the Company may enter into new forwards and options near maturity of the existing derivative in order to continue hedging the underlying investment. In forward transactions, Aflac Japan agrees with another party to buy a fixed amount of yen and sell a corresponding amount of U.S. dollars at a specified future date. The Company also uses one-sided foreign currency put options to mitigate the settlement risk on U.S. dollar-denominated assets related to extreme foreign currency rate changes. From time to time, Aflac Japan also executes foreign currency option transactions in a collar strategy, where Aflac Japan agrees with another party to simultaneously purchase put options and sell call options. In the purchased put transactions, Aflac Japan obtains the option to buy a fixed amount of yen and sell a corresponding amount of U.S. dollars at a specified future date. In the sold call transaction,transactions, Aflac Japan agrees to sell a fixed amount of yen and buy a corresponding amount of U.S. dollars at a specified future date. The combination of purchasing the put option and selling the call option results in no net premium being paid (i.e. a costless or zero-cost collar). The In 2021, the Company moved to a strategy that contains one-sided put options, fewer foreign currency forwards and options are usedno collars in fair value hedging relationshipsorder to mitigatereduce its exposure to pricing volatility and the foreign exchangerelated risk associated with U.S. dollar-denominated investments supporting yen-denominated liabilities.of negative settlements should there be a material weakening in the yen.

From time to time, the Company may also enter into foreign currency forwards and options to hedge the currency risk associated with the net investment in Aflac Japan. In these forward transactions, Aflacthe Company agrees with another party to buy a fixed amount of U.S. dollars and sell a corresponding amount of yen at a specified price at a specified future date. In the option transactions, the Company may use a combination of foreign currency options to protect expected future cash flows by simultaneously purchasing yen put options (options that protect against a weakening yen) and selling yen call options (options that limit participation in a strengthening yen). The combination of these two actions create a zero-cost collar. Additionally, the Company enters into purchased options to hedge cash flows from the net investment in Aflac Japan.

The Company enters into foreign currency swaps pursuant to which it exchanges an initial principal amount in one currency for an initial principal amount of another currency, with an agreement to re-exchange the principal amounts at a future date. There may also be periodic exchanges of payments at specified intervals based on the agreed upon rates and notional amounts. Foreign currency swaps are used primarily in the consolidated VIEs in the Company's Aflac Japan portfolio to convert foreign-denominated cash flows to yen, the functional currency of Aflac Japan, in order to minimize cash flow fluctuations. The Company also uses foreign currency swaps to economically convert certain of its U.S. dollar-denominated senior note and subordinated debenture principal and interest obligations into yen-denominated obligations.

In order to reduce investment income volatility from its variable-rate investments, the Company enters into receive–fixed, pay–floating interest rate swaps. These derivatives are cleared and settled through a central clearinghouse.


118



Swaptions are used to mitigate the adverse impact resulting from significant changes in the fair value of U.S. dollar-denominated available-for-sale securities due to fluctuation in interest rates. In a payer swaption, the Company pays a premium to obtain the right, but not the obligation, to enter into a swap contract where it will pay a fixed rate and receive a floating rate. Interest rate swaption collars are combinations of two swaption positions. In order to maximize the efficiency of the collars while minimizing cost, a collar strategy is used whereby the Company purchases a long payer swaption (the Company purchases an option that allows it to enter into a swap where the Company will pay the fixed rate and receive the floating rate of the swap) and sells a short receiver swaption (the Company sells an option that provides the counterparty with the right to enter into a swap where the Company will receive the fixed rate and pay the floating rate of the swap). The combination of purchasing the long payer swaption and selling the short receiver swaption results in no net premium being paid (i.e. a costless or zero-cost collar).

Bond purchase commitments result from repackaged bond structures that are consolidated VIEs whereby there is a delay in the trade date and settlement date of the bond within the structure to ensure completion of all necessary legal agreements to support the consolidated VIE that issues the repackaged bond. Since the Company has a commitment to purchase the underlying bond at a specified price, the agreement meets the definition of a derivative where the value is


123

derived based on the current market value of the bond compared to the fixed purchase price to be paid on the settlement date.

Derivative Balance Sheet Classification
The table below summarizes the balance sheet classification of the Company's derivative fair value amounts, as well as the gross asset and liability fair value amounts, at December 31. The fair value amounts presented do not include income accruals. Derivative assets are included in “Other Assets,” while derivative liabilities are included in “Other Liabilities” within the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. The notional amount of derivative contracts represents the basis upon which pay or receive amounts are calculated and are not reflective of exposure or credit risk.
20222021
(In millions)Asset
Derivatives
Liability
Derivatives
Asset
Derivatives
Liability
Derivatives
Hedge Designation/ Derivative
  Type
Notional
Amount
Fair ValueFair ValueNotional
Amount
Fair ValueFair Value
Cash flow hedges:
Foreign currency swaps - VIE$18 $0 $3 $18 $$
Total cash flow hedges18 0 3 18 
Fair value hedges:
Foreign currency forwards0 0 0 62 
Foreign currency options7,940 45 0 8,829 
Total fair value hedges7,940 45 0 8,891 
Net investment hedge:
Foreign currency forwards4,982 383 85 4,996 341 
Foreign currency options2,630 7 0 1,949 
Total net investment hedge7,612 390 85 6,945 341 
Non-qualifying strategies:
Foreign currency swaps1,900 66 0 2,250 59 13 
Foreign currency swaps - VIE3,420 62 387 3,151 78 412 
Foreign currency forwards5,049 17 640 15,953 450 1,133 
Foreign currency options5,521 30 0 2,746 
Interest rate swaps17,730 7 583 3,500 54 
Total non-qualifying strategies33,620 182 1,610 27,600 590 1,612 
Total derivatives$49,190 $617 $1,698 $43,454 $936 $1,619 

2019 2018
(In millions)    Asset
Derivatives
 Liability
Derivatives
  Asset
Derivatives
 Liability
Derivatives
Hedge Designation/ Derivative
Type
Notional
Amount
 Fair Value Fair ValueNotional
Amount
 Fair Value Fair Value
Cash flow hedges:                      
Foreign currency swaps - VIE $75
   $0
   $8
  $75
   $1
   $4
 
Total cash flow hedges 75
   0
   8
  75
   1
   4
 
Fair value hedges:                      
Foreign currency forwards 964
   0
   38
  2,086
   0
   34
 
Foreign currency options 11,573
   0
   5
  9,070
   3
   1
 
Interest rate swaptions 243
   0
   0
  500
   0
   1
 
Total fair value hedges 12,780
   0
   43
  11,656
   3
   36
 
Net investment hedge:                      
Foreign currency forwards 4,952
   72
   2
  0
   0
   0
 
Foreign currency options 2,000
   0
   0
  0
   0
   0
 
Total net investment hedge 6,952
   72
   2
  0
   0
   0
 
Non-qualifying strategies:                      
Foreign currency swaps 2,800
   72
   78
  2,800
   103
   129
 
Foreign currency swaps - VIE 2,587
   169
   118
  2,587
   181
   101
 
Foreign currency forwards 19,821
   166
   337
  16,057
   126
   117
 
Foreign currency options 9,553
   0
   0
  430
   0
   0
 
Interest rate swaps 7,120
   3
   0
  4,750
   3
   0
 
Interest rate swaptions 7
   0
   0
  0
   0
   0
 
Total non-qualifying strategies 41,888
   410
   533
  26,624
   413
   347
 
Total derivatives $61,695
   $482
   $586
  $38,355
   $417
   $387
 


Cash Flow Hedges

For certain variable-rate U.S. dollar-denominated available-for-sale securities held by Aflac Japan via consolidated VIEs, foreign currency swaps are used to swap the USDU.S. Dollar (USD) variable rate interest and principal payments to fixed rate JPYJapanese Yen (JPY) interest and principal payments. The Company has designated foreign currency swaps as a hedge of the variability in cash flows of a forecasted transaction or of amounts to be received or paid related to a recognized asset (“cash flow” hedge). The remaining maximum length of time for which these cash flows are hedged is 7approximately four years. The derivatives in the Company's consolidated VIEs that are not designated as accounting hedges are discussed in the "non-qualifying strategies" section of this note.

119



Fair Value Hedges
The Company designates and accounts for certain foreign currency forwards, options, and interest rate swaptions as fair value hedges when they meet the requirements for hedge accounting. The Company recognizes gains and losses on these derivatives as well as the offsetting gain or loss on the related hedged items in current earnings.

Foreign currency forwards and options hedge the foreign currency exposure of certain U.S. dollar-denominated available-for-sale fixed-maturity investments held in Aflac Japan. The change in the fair value of the foreign currency forwards


124

related to the changes in the difference between the spot rate and the forward price is excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness. The change in fair value of the foreign currency option related to the time value of the option is recognized in current earnings and is excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness.

Interest rate swaptions hedge the interest rate exposure of certain U.S. dollar-denominated available-for-sale securities held in Aflac Japan. For these hedging relationships, the Company excludes time value from the assessment of hedge effectiveness and recognizes changes in the intrinsic value of the swaptions in current earnings within net investment income. The change in the time value of the swaptions is recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) and amortized into earnings (net investment income) over its legal term.

The following table presents the gains and losses on derivatives and the related hedged items in fair value hedges for the years ended December 31.

120



Fair Value Hedging Relationships
(In millions)  Hedging Derivatives Hedged Items  
Hedging DerivativesHedged Items Total
Gains
(Losses)
 
Gains (Losses)
Excluded from Effectiveness Testing
(1)
 
Gains (Losses)
Included in Effectiveness Testing
(2)
 
 Gains (Losses)(2)
 Net Realized Gains (Losses) Recognized for Fair Value Hedge
2019:          
Foreign currency
forwards
Fixed maturity securities $(50) $(64) $14
 $(12) $2
Foreign currency
options
Fixed maturity securities (7) (7) 0
 0
 0
Interest rate
swaptions
Fixed maturity securities (9) (9) 0
 0
 0
Total gains (losses) $(66) $(80) $14
 $(12) $2
2018:       
Foreign currency forwardsFixed maturity securities $126
 $(104) $230
 $(242) $(12)
Foreign currency optionsFixed maturity securities 4
 4
 0
 0
 0
Interest rate
swaptions
Fixed maturity securities (1) (1) 0
 0
 0
Total gains (losses) $129
 $(101) $230
 $(242) $(12)
2017:       
Foreign currency forwardsFixed maturity and equity securities $98
 $(202) $300
 $(278) $22
Foreign currency optionsFixed maturity securities 21
 10
 11
 (10) 1
    Total gains (losses) $119
 $(192) $311
 $(288) $23

(In millions)Hedging DerivativesHedged Items
Hedging DerivativesHedged ItemsTotal
Gains
(Losses)
Gains (Losses)
Excluded from Effectiveness Testing
(1)
Gains (Losses)
Included in Effectiveness Testing
(2)
 Gains (Losses)(2)
Net Investment Gains (Losses) Recognized for Fair Value Hedge
2022:
Foreign currency optionsFixed maturity securities$(18)$(18)$0 $0 $0 
Total gains (losses)$(18)$(18)$0 $0 $0 
2021:
Foreign currency forwardsFixed maturity securities$(7)$$(7)$$(1)
Foreign currency optionsFixed maturity securities(26)(25)(1)
Total gains (losses)$(33)$(25)$(8)$10 $
2020:
Foreign currency forwardsFixed maturity securities$(14)$(8)$(6)$$
Foreign currency optionsFixed maturity securities(9)(8)(1)
    Total gains (losses)$(23)$(16)$(7)$$
(1) Gains (losses) excluded from effectiveness testing includes the forward point on foreign currency forwards and time value change on foreign currency options which are reported in the consolidated statement of earnings as realizednet investment gains (losses). It also includes the change in the fair value of the interest rate swaptions related to the time value of the swaptions which is recognized as a component of other comprehensive income (loss).
(2) Gains and losses on foreign currency forwards and options and related hedged items are reported in the consolidated statement of earnings as realizednet investment gains (losses). For interest rate swaptions and related hedged items, gains and losses included in the hedge assessment, premium amortization and time value amortization while the hedge items are still outstanding are reported within net investment income. The time value gains and losses for interest rate swaptions when the related hedged items are redeemed are reported in realizednet investment gains and losses consistent with the impact of the hedged item. For the years ended December 31, 20192022 and 2018,2021, gains and losses included in the hedge assessment on interest rate swaptions and related hedged items were immaterial.



125

The following table shows the carrying amounts of assets designated and qualifying as hedged items in fair value hedges of interest rate risk and the related cumulative hedge adjustment included in the carrying amount as of December 31.
(In millions)
Carrying Amount of the Hedged Assets/(Liabilities)(1)
 Cumulative Amount of Fair Value Hedging Adjustment Included in the Carrying Amount of Hedged Assets/(Liabilities) (In millions)
Carrying Amount of the Hedged Assets/(Liabilities)(1)
Cumulative Amount of Fair Value Hedging Adjustment Included in the Carrying Amount of Hedged Assets/(Liabilities)
 2019 2018 2019 2018 2022202120222021
Fixed maturity securities $4,633
 $6,593
 $256
 $294
 Fixed maturity securities$2,360 $3,038 $189 $205 
(1) The balance includes hedging adjustment on discontinued hedging relationships of $256$189 in 20192022 and $294$205 in 2018.2021.
The total notional amount of the Company's interest rate swaptions was $243 in 2019 and $500 in 2018. The hedging adjustment related to these derivatives was immaterial.

Net Investment Hedge

The Company's investment in Aflac Japan is affected by changes in the yen/dollar exchange rate. To mitigate this exposure, the Parent Company's yen-denominated liabilities (see Note 9) have been designated as non-derivative hedges.

121



Beginning in July 2019, certain foreign currency forwards and options were designated as derivative hedges of the foreign currency exposure of the Company's net investment in Aflac Japan. Prior to April 1, 2018, foreign currency forwards and options were alsohave been designated as derivative hedges of the foreign currency exposure of the Company's net investment in Aflac Japan.

The Company's net investment hedge was effective during the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021 and 2017.2020.
Non-qualifying Strategies
For the Company's derivative instruments in consolidated VIEs that do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment, all changes in their fair value are reported in current period earnings within realizednet investment gains (losses). The amount of gain or loss recognized in earnings for the Company's VIEs is attributable to the derivatives in those investment structures. While the change in value of the swaps is recorded through current period earnings, the change in value of the available-for-sale fixed maturity securities associated with these swaps is recorded through other comprehensive income.
As of December 31, 2019,2022, the Parent Company had $1.9 billion notional amount of cross-currency interest rate swap agreements related to certain of its $350 millionU.S. dollar-denominated senior notes due February 2022, $700 million seniorto effectively convert a portion of the interest on the notes due June 2023, $750 million senior notes due November 2024 and $450 million senior notes due March 2025.from U.S dollar to Japanese yen. Changes in the values of these swaps are recorded through current period earnings. For additional information regarding these swaps, see Note 9.
The Company uses foreign exchange forwards and options to economically mitigate the currency risk of some of its U.S. dollar-denominated loan receivables held within the Aflac Japan segment. These arrangements are not designated as accounting hedges, as the foreign currency remeasurement of the loan receivables impacts current period earnings, and generallysubstantially offsets gains and losses from foreign exchange forwards within realizednet investment gains (losses). The Company also has certain foreign exchange forwards on U.S. dollar-denominated AFSavailable-for-sale securities where hedge accounting is not being applied.
Prior to July 2019, in order to economically mitigate currency risk of future yen dividends from Aflac Japan while lowering consolidated hedge costs associated with Aflac Japan's U.S. dollar investment hedging, the Parent Company entered into offsetting hedge positions using foreign exchange forwards. This activity is reported in the Corporate and other segment. As of July 1, 2019, the Parent Company designates these foreign exchange forward contracts as accounting hedges of its net investment in Aflac Japan.

The Company uses interest rate swaps to economically convert the variable rate investment income to a fixed rate on certain variable-rate investments.




122


126


Impact of Derivatives and Hedging Instruments

The following table summarizes the impact to realized investment gains (losses)earnings and other comprehensive income (loss) from all derivatives and hedging instruments for the years ended December 31.
2019 2018 2017202220212020
(In millions)
Net Investment Income (1)
Realized Investment
Gains (Losses)
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
(2)
 
Net Investment Income (1)
Realized Investment
Gains (Losses)
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
(2)
 
Net Investment Income (1)
Realized
Investment
Gains (Losses)
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
(2)
(In millions)
Net Investment Income (1)
Net Investment
Gains (Losses)
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
(2)
Net Investment Income (1)
Net Investment
Gains (Losses)
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
(2)
Net Investment Income (1)
Net Investment
Gains (Losses)
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
(2)
Qualifying hedges:                   Qualifying hedges:
Cash flow hedges:                    Cash flow hedges:
Foreign currency swaps - VIE $(2) $(1) $(4) $0
 $0
 $3
  $0
 $0
 $1
  Foreign currency swaps - VIE$(1)$(4)$4 $(1)$(4)$$(1)$$(2)
Total cash flow hedges (2) (1)
(3) 
 (4)   0
 0
(3) 
 3
   0
 0
(3) 
 1
  Total cash flow hedges(1)(4)(3)4 (1)(4)(3)(1)(3)(2)
Fair value hedges:                    Fair value hedges:
Foreign currency forwards (3)
   (62)     (116)     (180)   
Foreign currency forwards (3)
0 (1)(7)
Foreign currency options (3)
   (7)     4
     11
   
Foreign currency options (3)
(18)(22)(8)
Interest rate swaptions (3)
 (1) 0
 (8)   0
 0
 (1)   0
 0
 0
 
Interest rate swaptions (3)
0 0 0 (1)(1)(1)
Total fair value hedges (1) (69) (8)   0
 (112) (1)   0
 (169) 0
  Total fair value hedges0 (18)0 (1)(24)(1)(15)
Net investment hedge:                    Net investment hedge:
Non-derivative hedging
instruments
   0
 (24)   0
 (32)   0
 (15)  Non-derivative hedging
instruments
0 371 328 (135)
Foreign currency forwards   10
 83
   0
 0
   0
 (25)  Foreign currency forwards(80)673 29 525 149 (282)
Foreign currency options   (4) 0
     0
 (8)     0
 5
  Foreign currency options(1)0 (4)(5)
Total net investment hedge   6
 59
     0
 (40)     0
 (35)  Total net investment hedge(81)1,044 25 853 144 (417)
Non-qualifying strategies:                    Non-qualifying strategies:
Foreign currency swaps   90
     (40)     9
    Foreign currency swaps159 135 29 
Foreign currency swaps - VIE   (68)     60
     44
    Foreign currency swaps - VIE9 (188)(122)
Foreign currency forwards   (148)     (135)     8
    Foreign currency forwards(650)(707)311 
Credit default swaps   0
     0
     (1)   
Foreign currency options Foreign currency options0 (3)(3)
Interest rate swaps   17
     3
     0
    Interest rate swaps(546)(38)49 
Interest rate swaptions Interest rate swaptions1 
Forward bond purchase
commitment - VIE
Forward bond purchase
commitment - VIE
(21)(1)
Total non-qualifying strategies   (110)       (112)       60
    Total non-qualifying strategies(1,048)(802)270 
Total $(3) $(174) $47
   $0
 $(224) $(38)   $0
 $(109) $(34)  Total$(1)$(1,151)$1,048 $(2)$(805)$858 $(2)$399 $(418)
(1)Cash Interest expense/income on cash flow hedges are recorded in net investment income. For interest rate swaptions classified as fair value hedges, the change in the time value of the swaptions is recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) and amortized into net investment income over its legal term. If the swaption is early terminated but the hedge itemsitem is still outstanding, the amortization of disposal amount of the swaptions is recorded in net investment income over the remaining life of the hedged items.
(2) Gains and losseson cash flow hedges and the change in the fair value of interest rate swaptions related to the time value of the swaptions in fair value hedges are recorded as unrealized gains (losses). Gains and losses on derivatives and net investment hedge itemshedges related to changes in foreign currency spot rates are recorded in the unrealized foreign currency translation gains (losses) line in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income (loss).
(2)(3) Impact of cash flow hedges reported as realizednet investment gains (losses) includes an immaterial amount$4 of gains or losses reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) into earnings. It also includesearnings during the year ended December 31, 2022, compared with $4 of losses and an immaterial amount excluded from effectiveness testing during the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182021 and 2017,2020, respectively.
(3) In addition, $1 of losses were reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) into earnings during the year ended December 31, 2022, compared with $2 of losses and an immaterial amount during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively, related to fair value hedges excluded component. Impact shown net of effect of hedged items (see Fair Value Hedges section of this Note 4 for further detail).


123


127


As of December 31, 2019,2022, $5 million of deferred gains and losses on derivative instruments recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income that are expected to be reclassified tointo earnings during the next twelve months were immaterial.months.

Credit Risk Assumed through Derivatives

For the foreign currency and credit default swaps associated with the Company's VIE investments for which it is the primary beneficiary, the Company bears the risk of loss due to counterparty default even though it is not a direct counterparty to those contracts.

The Company is a direct counterparty to the foreign currency swaps that it has entered into in connection with certain of its senior notes and subordinated debentures; foreign currency forwards; and foreign currency options, and therefore the Company is exposed to credit risk in the event of nonperformance by the counterparties in those contracts. The risk of counterparty default for the Company's foreign currency swaps, certain foreign currency forwards, and foreign currency options is mitigated by collateral posting requirements that counterparties to those transactions must meet.

As of December 31, 2019,2022, all of the Company's derivative agreement counterparties were investment grade.

The Company engages in over-the-counter (OTC) bilateral derivative transactions directly with unaffiliated third parties under International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. (ISDA) agreements and other documentation. Most of the ISDA agreements also include Credit Support Annexes (CSAs) provisions, which generally provide for two-way collateral postings at the first dollar of exposure. The Company mitigates the risk that counterparties to transactions might be unable to fulfill their contractual obligations by monitoring counterparty credit exposure and collateral value while generally requiring that collateral be posted at the outset of the transaction. In addition, a significant portion of the derivative transactions have provisions that give the counterparty the right to terminate the transaction upon a downgrade of Aflac’sthe Company's financial strength rating. The actual amount of payments that the Company could be required to make depends on market conditions, the fair value of outstanding affected transactions, and other factors prevailing at and after the time of the downgrade.

The Company also engages in OTC cleared derivative transactions through regulated central clearing counterparties. These positions are marked to market and margined on a daily basis (both initial margin and variation margin), and the Company has minimal exposure to credit-related losses in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to these derivatives.

Collateral posted by the Company to third parties for derivative transactions can generally be repledged or resold by the counterparties. The aggregate fair value of all derivative instruments with credit-risk-related contingent features that were in a net liability position by counterparty was approximately $301 million$1.3 billion and $139$904 million as of December 31, 20192022 and 2018,2021, respectively. If the credit-risk-related contingent features underlying these agreements had been triggered on December 31, 2019,2022, the Company estimates that it would be required to post a maximum of $46$167 million of additional collateral to these derivative counterparties. The Company is generally allowed to sell or repledge collateral obtained from its derivative counterparties, although it does not typically exercise such rights. (See the Offsetting tables below for collateral posted or received as of the reported balance sheet dates.)

Offsetting of Financial Instruments and Derivatives

Most of the Company's derivative instruments are subject to enforceable master netting arrangements that provide for the net settlement of all derivative contracts between the Parent Company or its subsidiaries and the respective counterparty in the event of default or upon the occurrence of certain termination events. Collateral support agreements with the master netting arrangements generally provide that the Company will receive or pledge financial collateral at the first dollar of exposure.

The Company has securities lending agreements with unaffiliated financial institutions that post collateral to the Company in return for the use of its fixed maturity and public equity securities (see Note 3). When the Company has entered into securities lending agreements with the same counterparty, the agreements generally provide for net settlement in the event of default by the counterparty. This right of set-off allows the Company to keep and apply collateral received if the counterparty failed to return the securities borrowed from the Company as contractually agreed. For additional information on the Company's accounting policy for securities lending, see Note 1.

The tables below summarize the Company's derivatives and securities lending transactions as of December 31, and as reflected in the tables, in accordance with U.S. GAAP, the Company's policy is to not offset these financial instruments in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.


124


128


Offsetting of Financial Assets and Derivative Assets
2019
   Gross Amounts Not Offset
in Balance Sheet
  
(In millions)Gross Amount of Recognized Assets 
Gross Amount
Offset in
Balance Sheet
 
Net Amount of Assets Presented
 in Balance Sheet
 Financial Instruments 
Securities
Collateral
 Cash Collateral Received Net Amount
Derivative
  assets:
                         
    Derivative
      assets subject to a
      master netting
      agreement or
      offsetting
      arrangement
                         
          OTC - bilateral $310
   $0
   $310
   $(190)  $(7)  $(113)   $0
 
          OTC - cleared 3
   0
   3
   0
  0
  0
   3
 
    Total derivative
assets subject to a
master netting
agreement or
offsetting
arrangement
 313
   0
   313
   (190)  (7)  (113)   3
 
    Derivative
      assets not subject
      to a master netting
      agreement or
      offsetting
      arrangement
                         
          OTC - bilateral 169
       169
             169
 
    Total derivative
assets not subject
to a master netting
agreement or
offsetting
arrangement
 169
       169
             169
 
    Total derivative
      assets
 482
   0
   482
   (190)  (7)  (113)   172
 
Securities lending
   and similar
   arrangements
 1,860
   0
   1,860
   0
  0
  (1,860)   0
 
    Total $2,342
   $0
   $2,342
   $(190)  $(7)  $(1,973)   $172
 


2022
Gross Amounts Not Offset
in Balance Sheet
(In millions)Gross Amount of Recognized AssetsGross Amount Offset in Balance SheetNet Amount of Assets Presented
 in Balance Sheet
Financial InstrumentsSecurities
Collateral
Cash Collateral ReceivedNet
 Amount
Derivative
  assets:
    Derivative
      assets subject to a
      master netting
      agreement or
      offsetting
      arrangement
          OTC - bilateral$548 $0 $548 $(167)$(60)$(320)$1 
          OTC - cleared7 0 7 (7)0 0 0 
    Total derivative
      assets subject to a
      master netting
      agreement or
      offsetting
      arrangement
555 0 555 (174)(60)(320)1 
    Derivative
      assets not subject
      to a master netting
      agreement or
      offsetting
      arrangement
          OTC - bilateral62 62 62 
    Total derivative
      assets not subject
      to a master netting
      agreement or
      offsetting
      arrangement
62 62 62 
    Total derivative
      assets
617 0 617 (174)(60)(320)63 
Securities lending
   and similar
   arrangements
1,788 0 1,788 0 0 (1,788)0 
    Total$2,405 $0 $2,405 $(174)$(60)$(2,108)$63 
125


129

2021
Gross Amounts Not Offset
in Balance Sheet
(In millions)Gross Amount of Recognized AssetsGross Amount Offset in Balance SheetNet Amount of Assets Presented in Balance SheetFinancial
Instruments
Securities CollateralCash Collateral ReceivedNet
 Amount
Derivative
  assets:
    Derivative
      assets subject to a
      master netting
      agreement or
      offsetting
      arrangement
          OTC - bilateral$858 $$858 $(471)$(53)$(334)$
    Total derivative
      assets subject to a
      master netting
      agreement or
      offsetting
      arrangement
858 858 (471)(53)(334)
    Derivative
      assets not subject
      to a master netting
      agreement or
      offsetting
      arrangement
          OTC - bilateral78 78 78 
    Total derivative
      assets not subject
      to a master netting
      agreement or
      offsetting
      arrangement
78 78 78 
    Total derivative
      assets
936 936 (471)(53)(334)78 
Securities lending
   and similar
   arrangements
2,124 2,124 (2,124)
    Total$3,060 $$3,060 $(471)$(53)$(2,458)$78 



2018
   Gross Amounts Not Offset
in Balance Sheet
  
(In millions)Gross Amount of Recognized Assets Gross Amount Offset in Balance Sheet Net Amount of Assets Presented in Balance Sheet 
Financial
Instruments
Securities CollateralCash Collateral Received Net Amount
Derivative
  assets:
                         
    Derivative
      assets subject to a
      master netting
      agreement or
      offsetting
      arrangement
                         
          OTC - bilateral $231
   $0
   $231
   $(152)  $(23)  $(55)   $1
 
          OTC - cleared 3
   0
   3
   0
  0
  (3)   0
 
    Total derivative
assets subject to a
master netting
agreement or
offsetting
arrangement
 234
   0
   234
   (152)  (23)  (58)   1
 
    Derivative
      assets not subject
      to a master netting
      agreement or
      offsetting
      arrangement
                         
          OTC - bilateral 183
       183
             183
 
    Total derivative
assets not subject
to a master netting
agreement or
offsetting
arrangement
 183
       183
             183
 
    Total derivative
      assets
 417
   0
   417
   (152)  (23)  (58)   184
 
Securities lending
   and similar
   arrangements
 1,029
   0
   1,029
   0
  0
  (1,029)   0
 
    Total $1,446
   $0
   $1,446
   $(152)  $(23)  $(1,087)   $184
 


130


126




Offsetting of Financial Liabilities and Derivative Liabilities
2019
   
Gross Amounts Not Offset
in Balance Sheet
  
(In millions)Gross Amount of Recognized Liabilities Gross Amount Offset in Balance Sheet Net Amount of Liabilities Presented in Balance Sheet Financial Instruments Securities Collateral Cash Collateral Pledged Net Amount
Derivative
  liabilities:
                         
    Derivative
      liabilities subject
      to a master netting
      agreement or
      offsetting
      arrangement
                         
          OTC - bilateral $459
   $0
   $459
   $(190)  $(222)  $(32)   $15
 
          OTC - cleared 1
   0
   1
   0
  0
  (1)   0
 
    Total derivative
liabilities subject
to a master netting
agreement or
offsetting
arrangement
 460
   0
   460
   (190)  (222)  (33)   15
 
    Derivative
      liabilities not
      subject to a
      master netting
      agreement or
      offsetting
      arrangement
                         
          OTC - bilateral 126
       126
             126
 
    Total derivative
liabilities not
subject to a
master netting
agreement or
offsetting
arrangement
 126
       126
             126
 
    Total derivative
      liabilities
 586
   0
   586
   (190)  (222)  (33)   141
 
Securities lending
   and similar
   arrangements
 1,876
   0
   1,876
   (1,860)  0
  0
   16
 
    Total $2,462
   $0
   $2,462
   $(2,050)  $(222)  $(33)   $157
 


2022
Gross Amounts Not Offset
in Balance Sheet
(In millions)Gross Amount of Recognized LiabilitiesGross Amount Offset in Balance SheetNet Amount of Liabilities Presented in Balance SheetFinancial InstrumentsSecurities CollateralCash Collateral PledgedNet
 Amount
Derivative
  liabilities:
    Derivative
      liabilities subject
      to a master netting
      agreement or
      offsetting
      arrangement
          OTC - bilateral$725 $0 $725 $(167)$(506)$(52)$0 
          OTC - cleared583 0 583 (7)0 (577)(1)
    Total derivative
      liabilities subject
      to a master netting
      agreement or
      offsetting
      arrangement
1,308 0 1,308 (174)(506)(629)(1)
    Derivative
      liabilities not
      subject to a
      master netting
      agreement or
      offsetting
      arrangement
          OTC - bilateral390 390 390 
    Total derivative
      liabilities not
      subject to a
      master netting
      agreement or
      offsetting
      arrangement
390 390 390 
    Total derivative
      liabilities
1,698 0 1,698 (174)(506)(629)389 
Securities lending
   and similar
   arrangements
1,809 0 1,809 (1,788)0 0 21 
    Total$3,507 $0 $3,507 $(1,962)$(506)$(629)$410 
127


131


2021
Gross Amounts Not Offset
in Balance Sheet
(In millions)Gross Amount of Recognized LiabilitiesGross Amount Offset in Balance SheetNet Amount of Liabilities Presented in Balance SheetFinancial InstrumentsSecurities CollateralCash Collateral PledgedNet
 Amount
Derivative
  liabilities:
    Derivative
      liabilities subject
      to a master netting
      agreement or
      offsetting
      arrangement
          OTC - bilateral$1,151 $$1,151 $(471)$(662)$(14)$
OTC - cleared54 54 (35)19 
    Total derivative
      liabilities subject
      to a master netting
      agreement or
      offsetting
      arrangement
1,205 1,205 (471)(662)(49)23 
    Derivative
      liabilities not
      subject to a
      master netting
      agreement or
      offsetting
      arrangement
          OTC - bilateral414 414 414 
    Total derivative
      liabilities not
      subject to a
      master netting
      agreement or
      offsetting
      arrangement
414 414 414 
    Total derivative
      liabilities
1,619 1,619 (471)(662)(49)437 
Securities lending
   and similar
   arrangements
2,162 2,162 (2,124)38 
    Total$3,781 $$3,781 $(2,595)$(662)$(49)$475 
2018
   Gross Amounts Not Offset
in Balance Sheet
  
(In millions)Gross Amount of Recognized Liabilities Gross Amount Offset in Balance Sheet Net Amount of Liabilities Presented in Balance Sheet Financial Instruments Securities Collateral Cash Collateral Pledged Net Amount
Derivative
  liabilities:
                         
    Derivative
      liabilities subject
      to a master netting
      agreement or
      offsetting
      arrangement
                         
          OTC - bilateral $285
   $0
   $285
   $(152)  $(37)  $(68)   $28
 
    Total derivative
liabilities subject
to a master netting
agreement or
offsetting
arrangement
 285
   0
   285
   (152)  (37)  (68)   28
 
    Derivative
      liabilities not
      subject to a
      master netting
      agreement or
      offsetting
      arrangement
                         
          OTC - bilateral 102
       102
             102
 
    Total derivative
liabilities not
subject to a
master netting
agreement or
offsetting
arrangement
 102
       102
             102
 
    Total derivative
      liabilities
 387
   0
   387
   (152)  (37)  (68)   130
 
Securities lending
   and similar
   arrangements
 1,052
   0
   1,052
   (1,029)  0
  0
   23
 
    Total $1,439
   $0
   $1,439
   $(1,181)  $(37)  $(68)   $153
 


For additional information on the Company's financial instruments, see the accompanying Notes 1, 3 and 5.

5.FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
5.FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Fair Value Hierarchy

U.S. GAAP specifies a hierarchy of valuation techniques based on whether the inputs to those valuation techniques are observable or unobservable. These two types of inputs create three valuation hierarchy levels. Level 1 valuations reflect quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets. Level 2 valuations reflect quoted market prices for similar assets or liabilities in an active market, quoted market prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in non-active markets or model-derived valuations in which all significant valuation inputs are observable in active markets. Level 3 valuations reflect valuations in which one or more of the significant inputs are not observable in an active market.

The following tables present the fair value hierarchy levels of the Company's assets and liabilities that are measured and carried at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31.

128

132


  2022
(In millions)Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
Significant
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Total
Fair
Value
Assets:
Securities available for sale, carried at
  fair value:
Fixed maturity securities:
Government and agencies$24,158 $956 $0 $25,114 
Municipalities0 2,320 0 2,320 
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities0 1,803 343 2,146 
Public utilities0 7,169 497 7,666 
Sovereign and supranational0 797 37 834 
Banks/financial institutions0 9,140 159 9,299 
Other corporate0 27,620 742 28,362 
Total fixed maturity securities24,158 49,805 1,778 75,741 
Equity securities822 60 209 1,091 
Other investments1,532 0 0 1,532 
Cash and cash equivalents3,943 0 0 3,943 
Other assets:
Foreign currency swaps0 128 0 128 
Foreign currency forwards0 400 0 400 
Foreign currency options0 82 0 82 
Interest rate swaps0 7 0 7 
Total other assets0 617 0 617 
Total assets$30,455 $50,482 $1,987 $82,924 
Liabilities:
Other liabilities:
Foreign currency swaps$0 $390 $0 $390 
Foreign currency forwards0 725 0 725 
Interest rate swaps0 583 0 583 
Total liabilities$0 $1,698 $0 $1,698 
  2019
(In millions)Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
 Significant
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 Total
Fair
Value
Assets:               
Securities available for sale, carried at
fair value:
               
Fixed maturity securities:               
Government and agencies $34,878
   $1,522
   $0
   $36,400
 
Municipalities 0
   1,847
   0
   1,847
 
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities 0
   232
   178
   410
 
Public utilities 0
   6,556
   224
   6,780
 
Sovereign and supranational 0
   1,042
   0
   1,042
 
Banks/financial institutions 0
   10,264
   23
   10,287
 
Other corporate 0
   34,234
   262
   34,496
 
Total fixed maturity securities 34,878
   55,697
   687
   91,262
 
Equity securities 642
   80
   80
   802
 
Other investments 628
   0
   0
   628
 
Cash and cash equivalents 4,896
   0
   0
   4,896
 
Other assets:               
Foreign currency swaps 0
   72
   169
   241
 
Foreign currency forwards 0
   238
   0
   238
 
Interest rate swaps 0
   3
   0
   3
 
Total other assets 0
   313
   169
   482
 
Total assets $41,044
   $56,090
   $936
   $98,070
 
Liabilities:               
Other liabilities:               
Foreign currency swaps $0
   $78
   $126
   $204
 
Foreign currency forwards 0
   377
   0
   377
 
Foreign currency options 0
   5
   0
   5
 
Total liabilities $0
   $460
   $126
   $586
 



133

129



  2018
(In millions)Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
 Significant
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 Total
Fair
Value
Assets:               
Securities available for sale, carried at
fair value:
               
Fixed maturity securities:               
Government and agencies $32,993
   $1,349
   $0
   $34,342
 
Municipalities 0
   1,863
   0
   1,863
 
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities 0
   162
   177
   339
 
Public utilities 0
   7,062
   109
   7,171
 
Sovereign and supranational 0
   1,260
   0
   1,260
 
Banks/financial institutions 0
   8,895
   23
   8,918
 
Other corporate 0
   28,789
   213
   29,002
 
Total fixed maturity securities 32,993
   49,380
   522
   82,895
 
Equity securities 874
   67
   46
   987
 
Other investments 152
   0
   0
   152
 
Cash and cash equivalents 4,337
   0
   0
   4,337
 
Other assets:               
Foreign currency swaps 0
   103
   182
   285
 
Foreign currency forwards 0
   126
   0
   126
 
Foreign currency options 0
   3
   0
   3
 
Interest rate swaps 0
   3
   0
   3
 
Total other assets 0
   235
   182
   417
 
Total assets $38,356
   $49,682
   $750
   $88,788
 
Liabilities:               
Other liabilities:               
Foreign currency swaps $0
   $132
   $102
   $234
 
Foreign currency forwards 0
   151
   0
   151
 
Foreign currency options 0
   1
   0
   1
 
Interest rate swaptions 0
   1
   0
   1
 
Total liabilities $0
   $285
   $102
   $387
 


  2021
(In millions)Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
Significant
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Total
Fair
Value
Assets:
Securities available for sale, carried at
  fair value:
Fixed maturity securities:
Government and agencies$32,532 $1,288 $$33,820 
Municipalities3,036 3,036 
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities955 291 1,246 
Public utilities9,558 493 10,051 
Sovereign and supranational1,072 43 1,115 
Banks/financial institutions11,546 45 11,591 
Other corporate37,411 426 37,837 
Total fixed maturity securities32,532 64,866 1,298 98,696 
Equity securities1,340 90 173 1,603 
Other investments1,726 1,726 
Cash and cash equivalents5,051 5,051 
Other assets:
Foreign currency swaps137 137 
Foreign currency forwards791 791 
Foreign currency options
Total other assets936 936 
Total assets$40,649 $65,892 $1,471 $108,012 
Liabilities:
Other liabilities:
Foreign currency swaps$$427 $$427 
Foreign currency forwards1,138 1,138 
Interest rate swaps54 54 
Total liabilities$$1,619 $$1,619 


130


134


The following tables present the carrying amount and fair value categorized by fair value hierarchy level for the Company's financial instruments that are not carried at fair value as of December 31.
20192022
(In millions)Carrying
Value
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
 Significant
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Total
Fair
Value
 (In millions)Carrying
Value
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
Significant
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Total
Fair
Value
Assets:           Assets:
Securities held to maturity,
carried at amortized cost:
           Securities held to maturity,
carried at amortized cost:
Fixed maturity securities:            Fixed maturity securities:
Government and agencies $22,241
 $27,937
 $354
 $0
 $28,291
 Government and agencies$18,267 $20,132 $180 $0 $20,312 
Municipalities 821
 0
 1,083
 0
 1,083
 Municipalities287 0 335 0 335 
Mortgage and asset-backed
securities
 16
 0
 7
 10
 17
 
Public utilities 2,535
 0
 2,954
 0
 2,954
 Public utilities37 0 41 0 41 
Sovereign and
supranational
 1,123
 0
 1,320
 0
 1,320
 Sovereign and
supranational
446 0 500 0 500 
Banks/financial institutions 916
 0
 1,018
 0
 1,018
 
Other corporate 2,433
 0
 2,911
 0
 2,911
 Other corporate19 0 22 0 22 
Commercial mortgage and
other loans
 9,569
 0
 0
 9,648
 9,648
 Commercial mortgage and
other loans
13,496 0 0 13,212 13,212 
Other investments (1)
 30
 0
 30
 0
 30
 
Other investments (1)
34 0 34 0 34 
Total assets $39,684
 $27,937
 $9,677
 $9,658
 $47,272
  Total assets$32,586 $20,132 $1,112 $13,212 $34,456 
Liabilities:           Liabilities:
Other policyholders’ funds $7,317
 $0
 $0
 $7,234
 $7,234
 Other policyholders’ funds$6,123 $0 $0 $6,022 $6,022 
Notes payable
(excluding leases)
 6,408
 0
 6,663
 272
 6,935
 Notes payable
(excluding leases)
7,295 0 6,024 802 6,826 
Total liabilities $13,725
 $0
 $6,663
 $7,506
 $14,169
 Total liabilities$13,418 $0 $6,024 $6,824 $12,848 
(1) Excludes policy loans of $250$214 and equity method investments of $569,$2,290 at carrying value


131135



    2018
(In millions)Carrying
Value
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
 Significant
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 Total
Fair
Value
Assets:                  
Securities held to maturity,
carried at amortized cost:
                  
  Fixed maturity securities:                  
Government and agencies $21,712
  $27,030
   $8
   $0
   $27,038
 
Municipalities 359
  0
   469
   0
   469
 
Mortgage and asset-backed
securities
 14
  0
   0
   15
   15
 
Public utilities 2,727
  0
   2,973
   0
   2,973
 
Sovereign and
supranational
 1,551
  0
   1,840
   0
   1,840
 
Banks/financial institutions 1,445
  0
   1,583
   0
   1,583
 
Other corporate 2,510
  0
   2,804
   0
   2,804
 
Commercial mortgage and
other loans
 6,919
  0
   0
   6,893
   6,893
 
Other investments (1)
 26
  0
   26
   0
   26
 
  Total assets $37,263
  $27,030
   $9,703
   $6,908
   $43,641
 
Liabilities:                  
Other policyholders’ funds $7,146
  $0
   $0
   $7,067
   $7,067
 
Notes payable
(excluding leases)
 5,765
  0
   5,606
   270
   5,876
 
Total liabilities $12,911
  $0
   $5,606
   $7,337
   $12,943
 

2021
(In millions)Carrying
Value
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
Significant
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Total
Fair
Value
Assets:
Securities held to maturity,
   carried at amortized cost:
  Fixed maturity securities:
Government and agencies$21,086 $25,469 $230 $$25,699 
Municipalities335 436 436 
Public utilities43 55 55 
Sovereign and
   supranational
514 650 650 
Other corporate22 29 29 
Commercial mortgage and
    other loans
11,786 11,996 11,996 
Other investments (1)
22 22 22 
  Total assets$33,808 $25,469 $1,422 $11,996 $38,887 
Liabilities:
Other policyholders’ funds$7,072 $$$6,957 $6,957 
Notes payable
   (excluding leases)
7,839 8,280 259 8,539 
Total liabilities$14,911 $$8,280 $7,216 $15,496 
(1) Excludes policy loans of $232$236 and equity method investments of $377,$1,858, at carrying value

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Fixed maturity and equity securities

The Company determines the fair values of fixed maturity securities and public and privately-issued equity securities using the following approaches or techniques: price quotes and valuations from third party pricing vendors (including quoted market prices readily available from public exchange markets), in-house valuations and non-binding price quotes the Company obtains from outside brokers.

A third party pricing vendor has developed valuation models to determine fair values of privately issued securities and derivatives associated with VIEs. Starting in June 2021 and July 2022, respectively, these models and associated processes and controls were transitioned to reflect the impact of the persistent economic environment and the changing regulatory framework.executed by Company personnel. These models are discounted cash flow (DCF) valuation models but also use information from related markets, specifically the CDScredit default swap (CDS) market, to estimate expected cash flows. These models take into consideration any unique characteristics of the securities or derivatives and make various adjustments to arrive at an appropriate issuer-specific loss adjusted credit curve. This credit curve is then used with the relevant recovery rates to estimate expected cash flows and modeling of additional features, including illiquidity adjustments, if necessary, to price the security or derivative by discounting those loss adjusted cash flows. In cases where a credit curve cannot be developed from the specific security features, the valuation methodology takes into consideration other market observable inputs, including:
1) the most appropriate comparable security(ies) of the issuer
2) issuer-specific CDS spreads
3) bonds or CDS spreads of comparable issuers with similar characteristics such as rating, geography, or sector
4) bond indices that are comparative in rating, industry, maturity and region.

The pricing data and market quotes the Company obtains from outside sources, including third party pricing services, are reviewed internally for reasonableness. If a fair value appears unreasonable, the Company will re-examine the inputs and assess the reasonableness of the pricing data with the vendor. Additionally, the Company may compare the inputs to

132



relevant market indices and other performance measurements. Based on management's analysis, the valuation is confirmed or may be revised if there is evidence of a more appropriate estimate of fair value based on available market


136

data. The Company has performed verification of the inputs and calculations in any valuation models to confirm that the valuations represent reasonable estimates of fair value.

The fixed maturity securities classified as Level 3 consist of securities with limited or no observable valuation inputs. For Level 3 securities, the Company estimates the fair value of these securities by obtaining non-binding broker quotes from a limited number of brokers. These brokers base their quotes on a combination of their knowledge of the current pricing environment and market conditions. The Company considers these inputs to be unobservable. The Company also considers a variety of significant valuation inputs in the valuation process, including forward exchange rates, yen swap rates, dollar swap rates, interest rate volatilities, credit spread data on specific issuers, assumed default and default recovery rates, and certain probability assumptions. In obtaining these valuation inputs, the Company has determined that certain pricing assumptions and data used by its pricing sources are difficult to validate or corroborate by the market and/or appear to be internally developed rather than observed in or corroborated by the market. The use of these unobservable valuation inputs causes more subjectivity in the valuation process for these securities.

For the periods presented, the Company has not adjusted the quotes or prices it obtains from the pricing services and brokers it uses.

The following tables present the pricing sources for the fair values of the Company's fixed maturity and equity securities as of December 31.

133

137


2022
(In millions)Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
Significant Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
Total
Fair
Value
Securities available for sale, carried at fair value:
      Fixed maturity securities:
         Government and agencies:
Third party pricing vendor$24,158 $582 $0 $24,740 
Internal0 374 0 374 
               Total government and agencies24,158 956 0 25,114 
         Municipalities:
Third party pricing vendor0 2,021 0 2,021 
Internal0 299 0 299 
               Total municipalities0 2,320 0 2,320 
         Mortgage- and asset-backed securities:
Third party pricing vendor0 1,798 0 1,798 
Internal0 3 0 3 
Broker/other0 2 343 345 
               Total mortgage- and asset-backed securities0 1,803 343 2,146 
         Public utilities:
Third party pricing vendor0 3,786 0 3,786 
Internal0 3,383 0 3,383 
Broker/other0 0 497 497 
               Total public utilities0 7,169 497 7,666 
         Sovereign and supranational:
Third party pricing vendor0 232 0 232 
Internal0 565 0 565 
Broker/other0 0 37 37 
               Total sovereign and supranational0 797 37 834 
         Banks/financial institutions:
Third party pricing vendor0 4,622 0 4,622 
Internal0 4,518 105 4,623 
Broker/other0 0 54 54 
               Total banks/financial institutions0 9,140 159 9,299 
         Other corporate:
Third party pricing vendor0 22,268 0 22,268 
Internal0 5,352 200 5,552 
Broker/other0 0 542 542 
               Total other corporate0 27,620 742 28,362 
                  Total securities available for sale$24,158 $49,805 $1,778 $75,741 
Equity securities, carried at fair value:
Third party pricing vendor$822 $60 $0 $882 
Broker/other0 0 209 209 
               Total equity securities$822 $60 $209 $1,091 
  2019
(In millions) Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 Significant Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
 Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
 Total
Fair
Value
Securities available for sale, carried at fair value:                
      Fixed maturity securities:                
         Government and agencies:                
            Third party pricing vendor  $34,878
   $1,522
   $0
   $36,400
 
               Total government and agencies  34,878
   1,522
   0
   36,400
 
         Municipalities:                
            Third party pricing vendor  0
   1,847
   0
   1,847
 
               Total municipalities  0
   1,847
   0
   1,847
 
         Mortgage- and asset-backed securities:                
            Third party pricing vendor  0
   232
   0
   232
 
            Broker/other  0
   0
   178
   178
 
               Total mortgage- and asset-backed securities  0
   232
   178
   410
 
         Public utilities:                
            Third party pricing vendor  0
   6,556
   0
   6,556
 
            Broker/other  0
   0
   224
   224
 
               Total public utilities  0
   6,556
   224
   6,780
 
         Sovereign and supranational:                
            Third party pricing vendor  0
   1,042
   0
   1,042
 
               Total sovereign and supranational  0
   1,042
   0
   1,042
 
         Banks/financial institutions:                
            Third party pricing vendor  0
   10,264
   0
   10,264
 
            Broker/other  0
   0
   23
   23
 
               Total banks/financial institutions  0
   10,264
   23
   10,287
 
         Other corporate:                
            Third party pricing vendor  0
   34,234
   0
   34,234
 
            Broker/other  0
   0
   262
   262
 
               Total other corporate  0
   34,234
   262
   34,496
 
                  Total securities available for sale  $34,878
   $55,697
   $687
   $91,262
 
Equity securities, carried at fair value:                
            Third party pricing vendor  $642
   $80
   $0
   $722
 
            Broker/other  0
   0
   80
   80
 
               Total equity securities  $642
   $80
   $80
   $802
 



138

134



  2019
(In millions) Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 Significant Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
 Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
 Total
Fair
Value
Securities held to maturity, carried at amortized cost:                
      Fixed maturity securities:                
         Government and agencies:                
            Third party pricing vendor  $27,937
   $354
   $0
   $28,291
 
               Total government and agencies  27,937
   354
   0
   28,291
 
         Municipalities:                
            Third party pricing vendor  0
   1,083
   0
   1,083
 
               Total municipalities  0
   1,083
   0
   1,083
 
         Mortgage- and asset-backed securities:                
            Third party pricing vendor  0
   7
   0
   7
 
            Broker/other  0
   0
   10
   10
 
               Total mortgage- and asset-backed securities  0
   7
   10
   17
 
         Public utilities:                
            Third party pricing vendor  0
   2,954
   0
   2,954
 
               Total public utilities  0
   2,954
   0
   2,954
 
         Sovereign and supranational:                
            Third party pricing vendor  0
   1,320
   0
   1,320
 
               Total sovereign and supranational  0
   1,320
   0
   1,320
 
         Banks/financial institutions:                
            Third party pricing vendor  0
   1,018
   0
   1,018
 
               Total banks/financial institutions  0
   1,018
   0
   1,018
 
         Other corporate:                
            Third party pricing vendor  0
   2,911
   0
   2,911
 
               Total other corporate  0
   2,911
   0
   2,911
 
                  Total securities held to maturity  $27,937
   $9,647
   $10
   $37,594
 


2022
(In millions)Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
Significant Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
Total
Fair
 Value
Securities held to maturity, carried at amortized cost:
      Fixed maturity securities:
         Government and agencies:
Third party pricing vendor$20,132 $180 $0 $20,312 
               Total government and agencies20,132 180 0 20,312 
         Municipalities:
Third party pricing vendor0 335 0 335 
               Total municipalities0 335 0 335 
         Public utilities:
Third party pricing vendor0 41 0 41 
               Total public utilities0 41 0 41 
         Sovereign and supranational:
Third party pricing vendor0 242 0 242 
Broker/other0 258 0 258 
               Total sovereign and supranational0 500 0 500 
         Other corporate:
Third party pricing vendor0 22 0 22 
               Total other corporate0 22 0 22 
                  Total securities held to maturity$20,132 $1,078 $0 $21,210 
135


139


2021
(In millions)Quoted Prices in Active Markets
for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
Significant Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
Total
Fair
Value
Securities available for sale, carried at fair value:
      Fixed maturity securities:
         Government and agencies:
Third party pricing vendor$32,532 $808 $$33,340 
Internal480 480 
               Total government and agencies32,532 1,288 33,820 
         Municipalities:
Third party pricing vendor2,222 2,222 
Internal814 814 
               Total municipalities3,036 3,036 
         Mortgage- and asset-backed securities:
Third party pricing vendor955 955 
Broker/other291 291 
               Total mortgage- and asset-backed securities955 291 1,246 
         Public utilities:
Third party pricing vendor4,527 4,527 
Internal5,031 5,031 
Broker/other493 493 
               Total public utilities9,558 493 10,051 
         Sovereign and supranational:
Third party pricing vendor273 273 
Internal799 799 
Broker/other43 43 
               Total sovereign and supranational1,072 43 1,115 
         Banks/financial institutions:
Third party pricing vendor5,237 5,237 
Internal6,309 6,309 
Broker/other45 45 
               Total banks/financial institutions11,546 45 11,591 
         Other corporate:
Third party pricing vendor29,495 29,495 
Internal7,916 7,916 
Broker/other426 426 
               Total other corporate37,411 426 37,837 
                  Total securities available for sale$32,532 $64,866 $1,298 $98,696 
Equity securities, carried at fair value:
Third party pricing vendor$1,340 $90 $$1,430 
Broker/other173 173 
               Total equity securities$1,340 $90 $173 $1,603 
  2018
(In millions) Quoted Prices in Active Markets
for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 Significant Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
 Total
Fair
Value
Securities available for sale, carried at fair value:                
      Fixed maturity securities:                
         Government and agencies:                
            Third party pricing vendor  $32,993
   $1,349
   $0
   $34,342
 
               Total government and agencies  32,993
   1,349
   0
   34,342
 
         Municipalities:                
            Third party pricing vendor  0
   1,863
   0
   1,863
 
               Total municipalities  0
   1,863
   0
   1,863
 
         Mortgage- and asset-backed securities:                
            Third party pricing vendor  0
   162
   0
   162
 
            Broker/other  0
   0
   177
   177
 
               Total mortgage- and asset-backed securities  0
   162
   177
   339
 
         Public utilities:                
            Third party pricing vendor  0
   7,062
   0
   7,062
 
            Broker/other  0
   0
   109
   109
 
               Total public utilities  0
   7,062
   109
   7,171
 
         Sovereign and supranational:                
            Third party pricing vendor  0
   1,260
   0
   1,260
 
               Total sovereign and supranational  0
   1,260
   0
   1,260
 
         Banks/financial institutions:                
            Third party pricing vendor  0
   8,895
   0
   8,895
 
            Broker/other  0
   0
   23
   23
 
               Total banks/financial institutions  0
   8,895
   23
   8,918
 
         Other corporate:                
            Third party pricing vendor  0
   28,789
   0
   28,789
 
            Broker/other  0
   0
   213
   213
 
               Total other corporate  0
   28,789
   213
   29,002
 
                  Total securities available for sale  $32,993
   $49,380
   $522
   $82,895
 
Equity securities, carried at fair value:                
            Third party pricing vendor  $874
   $67
   $0
   $941
 
            Broker/other  0
   0
   46
   46
 
               Total equity securities  $874
   $67
   $46
   $987
 



140

136



2021
(In millions)Quoted Prices in Active Markets
for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
Significant Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
Total
Fair
 Value
Securities held to maturity, carried at amortized cost:
      Fixed maturity securities:
         Government and agencies:
Third party pricing vendor$25,469 $230 $$25,699 
               Total government and agencies25,469 230 25,699 
         Municipalities:
Third party pricing vendor436 436 
               Total municipalities436 436 
         Public utilities:
Third party pricing vendor55 55 
               Total public utilities55 55 
         Sovereign and supranational:
Third party pricing vendor313 313 
Broker/other337 337 
               Total sovereign and supranational650 650 
         Other corporate:
Third party pricing vendor29 29 
               Total other corporate29 29 
                  Total securities held to maturity$25,469 $1,400 $$26,869 
  2018
(In millions) Quoted Prices in Active Markets
for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 Significant Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
 Total
Fair
Value
Securities held to maturity, carried at amortized cost:                
      Fixed maturity securities:                
         Government and agencies:                
            Third party pricing vendor  $27,030
   $8
   $0
   $27,038
 
               Total government and agencies  27,030
   8
   0
   27,038
 
         Municipalities:                
            Third party pricing vendor  0
   469
   0
   469
 
               Total municipalities  0
   469
   0
   469
 
         Mortgage- and asset-backed securities:                
            Broker/other  0
   0
   15
   15
 
               Total mortgage- and asset-backed securities  0
   0
   15
   15
 
         Public utilities:                
            Third party pricing vendor  0
   2,973
   0
   2,973
 
               Total public utilities  0
   2,973
   0
   2,973
 
         Sovereign and supranational:                
            Third party pricing vendor  0
   1,840
   0
   1,840
 
               Total sovereign and supranational  0
   1,840
   0
   1,840
 
         Banks/financial institutions:                
            Third party pricing vendor  0
   1,583
   0
   1,583
 
               Total banks/financial institutions  0
   1,583
   0
   1,583
 
         Other corporate:                
            Third party pricing vendor  0
   2,804
   0
   2,804
 
               Total other corporate  0
   2,804
   0
   2,804
 
                  Total securities held to maturity  $27,030
   $9,677
   $15
   $36,722
 


The following is a discussion of the determination of fair value of the Company's remaining financial instruments.

Derivatives

The Company uses derivative instruments to manage the risk associated with certain assets. However, the derivative instrument may not be classified in the same fair value hierarchy level as the associated asset. The Company uses pricing models to determine the estimated fair value of derivatives. Inputs used to value derivatives include, but are not limited to, interest rates, credit spreads, foreign currency forward and spot rates, and interest volatility. The significant inputs to pricing derivatives are generally observable in the market or can be derived by observable market data. When these inputs are observable, the derivatives are classified as Level 2.

The Company uses present value techniques to value non-option based derivatives. It also uses option pricing models to value option based derivatives. Key inputs are as follows:
Instrument TypeLevel 2
Interest rate derivatives
Swap yield curves
Basic curves
Interest rate volatility (1)
Foreign currency exchange rate derivatives - Non-VIES (forwards, swaps and options)
Foreign currency forward rates
Swap yield curves
Basis curves
Foreign currency spot rates
Cross foreign currency basis curves
Foreign currency volatility(1)
Foreign currency exchange rate derivatives - VIEs (swaps)
Foreign currency spot rates
Swap yield curves
Credit default swap curves
Basis curves
Recovery rates
Foreign currency forward rates
Foreign cross currency basis curves
(1) Option-based only



141

The fair values of the foreign currency forwards and options are based on observable market inputs, therefore they are classified as Level 2.

The Parent Company has cross-currency swap agreements related to certain of its U.S. dollar-denominated senior notes to effectively convert a portion of the interest on the notes from U.S dollar to Japanese yen. Their fair values are based on observable market inputs, therefore they are classified as Level 2.

To determine the fair value of its interest rate derivatives, the Company uses inputs that are generally observable in the market or can be derived from observable market data. Interest rate swaps are cleared trades. In a cleared swap contract, the clearinghouse provides benefits to the counterparties similar to contracts listed for investment traded on an exchange since it maintains a daily margin to mitigate counterpartiescounterparties' credit risk. These derivatives are priced using observable inputs, accordingly, they are classified as Level 2. For its interest rate swaptions, the Company estimates their fair values using observable market data, including interest rate curves and volatilities.volatility. Their fair values are also classified as Level 2.

For derivatives associated with VIEs where the Company is the primary beneficiary, the Company is not the direct counterparty to the swap contracts. As a result,Nevertheless, the fairCompany has full transparency into the contracts to properly value measurements incorporate the credit risk of the collateral associated with the VIE. The Company receives valuations from a third party pricing vendorswaps for these derivatives. Based on

137



an analysis ofreporting purposes. Prior to October 1, 2021, these derivatives and a review of the methodology employed by the pricing vendor, the Companywere classified as Level 3 because certain significant inputs were determined thatto be unobservable, primarily due to the long duration of thesethe swaps which required extrapolation beyond the observable limits of the curve(s). However, due to the natural aging of the swap portfolio and the need to extrapolate from short-term observable data to derive and measurecontinued evolution of capital market inputs, especially the availability of long-term interest rates with tenors beyond 30 years, the Company has concluded that all significant inputs certain inputs, assumptions and judgments are required to value future cash flows that cannot be corroborated by current inputs or current observable market data.now observable. As a result, effective October 1, 2021, the Company transferred the derivatives associated with its consolidated VIEs to Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

For forward bond purchase commitments with VIEs, the fair value of the derivative is based on the difference in the fixed purchase price and the current market value of the related bond prior to the settlement date. Since the bond is typically a public bond with readily available pricing, the derivatives associated with the Company's consolidated VIEsforward purchase commitment are classified as Level 32 of the fair value hierarchy.

Commercial mortgage and other loans

Commercial mortgage and other loans include transitional real estate loans, commercial mortgage loansTREs, CMLs and middle market loans.MMLs. The Company's loan receivables do not have readily determinable market prices and generally lack market liquidity. Fair values for loan receivables are determined based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the applicable U.S. Treasury or London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR)floating-rate benchmark yield plus an appropriate spread that considers other risk factors, such as credit and liquidity risk. These spreads are provided by the applicable asset managers based on their knowledge of the current loan pricing environment and market conditions. The spreads are a significant component of the pricing inputs and are generally considered unobservable. Therefore, these investments have been assigned a Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy.

Other investments

Other investments includes short-term investments that are measured at fair value where amortized cost approximates fair value.

Other policyholders' funds

The largest component of the other policyholders' funds liability is the Company's annuity line of business in Aflac Japan. The Company's annuities have fixed benefits and premiums. For this product, the Company estimates the fair value to be equal to the cash surrender value. This is analogous to the value paid to policyholders on the valuation date if they were to surrender their policy. The Company periodically checks the cash value against discounted cash flow projections for reasonableness. The Company considers its inputs for this valuation to be unobservable and have accordingly classified this valuation as Level 3.

Notes payable

The fair values of the Company's publicly issued notes payable are determined by utilizing available sources of observable inputs from third party pricing vendors and are classified as Level 2. The fair values of the Company's yen-denominated loans approximate their carrying values and are classified as Level 3.



142

Transfers between Hierarchy Levels and Level 3 Rollforward

There were no transfers between Level 1 and 2 for assetsAssets and liabilities are transferred into Level 3 when a significant input cannot be corroborated with market observable data. This occurs when market activity decreases significantly and underlying inputs cannot be observed, current prices are not available, and/or when there are significant variances in quoted prices, thereby affecting transparency. Assets and liabilities are transferred out of Level 3 when circumstances change such that a significant input can be corroborated with market observable data. This may be due to a significant increase in market activity, a specific event, or one or more significant input(s) becoming observable. Effective October 1, 2021, the foreign exchange swaps discussed above were transferred from Level 3 to Level 2 because the significant inputs used for their valuation that were previously unobservable are measured and carried at fair value on a recurring basis for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.now observable.

The following tables present the changes in fair value of the Company's investments and derivatives carried at fair value classified as Level 3 as of December 31. Derivative assets and liabilities are presented as a net value.
2022
 Fixed Maturity SecuritiesEquity
Securities
Derivatives
(In millions)Mortgage-
and
Asset-
Backed
Securities
Public
Utilities
Sovereign
and
Supranational
Banks/
Financial
Institutions
Other
Corporate
 Foreign
Currency
Swaps
Total
Balance, beginning of period$291 $493 $43 $45 $426 $173 $$1,471 
Net investment gains (losses) included
  in earnings
(4)5 
Unrealized gains (losses) included in
  other comprehensive income (loss)
(76)(99)(6)(14)(93)(288)
Purchases, issuances, sales
  and settlements:
Purchases273 35 132 387 59 886 
Issuances
Sales
Settlements(78)(64)(23)(187)(7)(359)
Transfers into Level 3128 18 350 496 
Transfers out of Level 3(63)(141)(20)(224)
Balance, end of period$343 $497 $37 $159 $742 $209 $$1,987 
Changes in unrealized gains (losses)
  relating to Level 3 assets and liabilities
  still held at the end of the period
  included in earnings
$(4)$$$$$$$(2)

138


143

2021
  Fixed Maturity SecuritiesEquity
Securities
Derivatives  
(In millions)Mortgage-
and
Asset-
Backed
Securities
Public
Utilities
Sovereign
and
Supranational
Banks/
Financial
Institutions
Other
Corporate
 Foreign
Currency
Swaps
Total
Balance, beginning of period$224 $422 $48 $24 $299 $102 $(98)$1,021 
Net investment gains (losses) included
  in earnings
21 (158)(135)
Unrealized gains (losses) included in
  other comprehensive income (loss)
(25)(21)(5)(2)(11)(1)(65)
Purchases, issuances, sales
  and settlements:
Purchases169 167 23 90 41 490 
Issuances17 17 
Sales(2)(23)(8)(33)
Settlements(21)(17)(38)
Transfers into Level 323 84 107 
Transfers out of Level 3(77)(52)(21)257 107 
Balance, end of period$291 $493 $43 $45 $426 $173 $$1,471 
Changes in unrealized gains (losses)
  relating to Level 3 assets and liabilities
  still held at the end of the period
  included in earnings
$(24)$(23)$(4)$(2)$(27)$21 $(158)$(217)

2019 
 Fixed Maturity Securities Equity
Securities
 
Derivatives(1)
   
(In millions)Mortgage-
and
Asset-
Backed
Securities
 Public
Utilities
 Banks/
Financial
Institutions
 Other
Corporate
   Foreign
Currency
Swaps
 Credit
Default
Swaps
 Total 
Balance, beginning of period$177
 $109
 $23
 $213
 $46
 $80
 $0
 $648
 
Realized investment gains (losses) included
in earnings
0
 0
 0
 (1) 0
 (33) 0
 (34) 
Unrealized gains (losses) included in other
comprehensive income (loss)
1
 6
 1
 8
 0
 (4) 0
 12
 
Purchases, issuances, sales and settlements:                
Purchases0
 48
 0
 165
 34
 0
 0
 247
 
Issuances0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 
Sales0
 (24) 0
 (17) 0
 0
 0
 (41) 
Settlements0
 (6) 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 (6) 
Transfers into Level 30
 116
(2) 
0
 26
(2) 
0
 0
 0
 142
 
Transfers out of Level 30
 (25)
(2) 
(1) (132)
(2), (3) 
0
 0
 0
 (158) 
Balance, end of period$178
 $224
 $23
 $262
 $80
 $43
 $0
 $810
 
Changes in unrealized gains (losses) relating
to Level 3 assets and liabilities still held at
the end of the period included in earnings
$0
 $0
 $0
 $0
 $0
 $(33) $0
 $(33) 

(1) Derivative assets and liabilities are presented net
(2) Transfer due to sector classification change
(3) Transfer due to availability of observable market inputs
2018 
  Fixed Maturity Securities Equity
Securities
 
Derivatives(1)
    
(In millions)Mortgage-
and
Asset-
Backed
Securities
 Public
Utilities
 Banks/
Financial
Institutions
 Other
Corporate
   Foreign
Currency
Swaps
 Credit
Default
Swaps
 Total 
Balance, beginning of period$175
 $68
 $25
 $146
 $16
 $22
 $1
 $453
 
Realized investment gains (losses) included in
earnings
0
 0
 0
 0
 (1) 54
 (1) 52
 
Unrealized gains (losses) included in other
comprehensive income (loss)
2
 1
 (2) 1
 0
 4
 0
 6
 
Purchases, issuances, sales and settlements:

   

   

 

 

 

 
Purchases0
 40
 0
 56
 31
 0
 0
 127
 
Issuances0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 
Sales0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 
Settlements0
 0
 0
 (6) 0
 0
 0
 (6) 
Transfers into Level 30
 0
 0
 16
 0
 0
 0
 16
 
Transfers out of Level 30
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 0
 
Balance, end of period$177
 $109
 $23
 $213
 $46
 $80
 $0
 $648
 
Changes in unrealized gains (losses) relating
to Level 3 assets and liabilities still held at
the end of the period included in earnings
$0
 $0
 $0
 $0
 $(1) $54
 $(1) $52
 

(1) Derivative assets and liabilities are presented net144



139



Fair Value Sensitivity

Level 3 Significant Unobservable Input Sensitivity

The following tables summarize the significant unobservable inputs used in the valuation of the Company's Level 3 investments and derivatives carried at fair value as of December 31. Included in the tables are the inputs or range of possible inputs that have an effect on the overall valuation of the financial instruments.
2019
(In millions) Fair Value Valuation Technique(s) Unobservable Input Range
(Weighted Average)
 
Assets:           
  Securities available for sale, carried at fair value:           
    Fixed maturity securities:           
       Mortgage- and asset-backed securities  $178
  Consensus pricing Offered quotes N/A
(a) 
       Public utilities  224
  Discounted cash flow Credit spreads N/A
(a) 
       Banks/financial institutions  23
  Consensus pricing Offered quotes N/A
(a) 
       Other corporate  262
  Discounted cash flow Credit spreads N/A
(a) 
  Equity securities  80
  Net asset value Offered quotes N/A
(a) 
  Other assets:           
       Foreign currency swaps  106
  Discounted cash flow Interest rates (USD) 1.89% - 2.09%
(b) 
        Interest rates (JPY) .12% - .43%
(c) 
        CDS spreads 10 - 100 bps 
   63
  Discounted cash flow Interest rates (USD) 1.89% - 2.09%
(b) 
        Interest rates (JPY) .12% - .43%
(c) 
            Total assets  $936
        
Liabilities:           
  Other liabilities:           
       Foreign currency swaps  $118
  Discounted cash flow Interest rates (USD) 1.89% - 2.09%
(b) 
        Interest rates (JPY) .12% - .43%
(c) 
        CDS spreads 13 - 159 bps 
   8
  Discounted cash flow Interest rates (USD) 1.89% - 2.09%
(b) 
        Interest rates (JPY) .12% - .43%
(c) 
            Total liabilities  $126
        

2022
(In millions)Fair ValueValuation Technique(s)Unobservable InputRange
Assets:
  Securities available for sale, carried at fair value:
    Fixed maturity securities:
       Mortgage- and asset-backed securities$343 Consensus pricingOffered quotes97.38-106.71(a)
       Public utilities497 Discounted cash flowCredit spreads128 bps-286 bps(b)
       Sovereign and supranational37 Consensus pricingOffered quotesN/A(c)
       Banks/financial institutions159 Discounted cash flowCredit spreads67 bps-188 bps(b)
       Other corporate742 Discounted cash flowCredit spreads66 bps-647 bps(b)
  Equity securities209 Adjusted costPrivate financialsN/A(d)
            Total assets$1,987 
(a) N/A representsRepresents prices for securities where the Company receives unadjusted broker quotes and for which there is no transparency into the providers' valuation techniques or unobservable inputs.techniques.
(b) Inputs derived from U.S. long-term rates to accommodate long maturity nature of the Company's swapsActual or equivalent credit spreads in basis points.
(c) Inputs derived from Japan long-term rates to accommodate long maturity nature of the Company's swapsCategory represents a single security; range not applicable.

(d) Prices do not utilize credit spreads therefore range is not applicable.





140



2018
(In millions) Fair Value Valuation Technique(s) Unobservable Input Range
(Weighted Average)
 
Assets:           
  Securities available for sale, carried at fair value:           
    Fixed maturity securities:           
       Mortgage- and asset-backed securities  $177
  Consensus pricing Offered quotes N/A
(a) 
       Public utilities  109
  Discounted cash flow Credit spreads N/A
(a) 
       Banks/financial institutions  23
  Consensus pricing Offered quotes N/A
(a) 
       Other corporate  213
  Discounted cash flow Credit spreads N/A
(a) 
  Equity securities  46
  Net asset value Offered quotes N/A
(a) 
  Other assets:           
       Foreign currency swaps  125
  Discounted cash flow Interest rates (USD) 2.75% - 2.84%
(b) 
        Interest rates (JPY) .18% - .71%
(c) 
        CDS spreads 19 - 120 bps 
   57
  Discounted cash flow Interest rates (USD) 2.75% - 2.84%
(b) 
        Interest rates (JPY) .18% - .71%
(c) 
            Total assets  $750
        
Liabilities:           
  Other liabilities:           
       Foreign currency swaps  $98
  Discounted cash flow Interest rates (USD) 2.75% - 2.84%
(b) 
        Interest rates (JPY) .18% - .71%
(c) 
        CDS spreads 28 - 211 bps 
   4
  Discounted cash flow Interest rates (USD) 2.75% - 2.84%
(b) 
        Interest rates (JPY) .18% - .71%
(c) 
            Total liabilities  $102
        

2021
(In millions)Fair ValueValuation Technique(s)Unobservable InputRange
Assets:
  Securities available for sale, carried at fair value:
    Fixed maturity securities:
       Mortgage- and asset-backed securities$291 Consensus pricingOffered quotes104.79-111.36(a)
       Public utilities493 Discounted cash flowCredit spreads118 bps-260 bps(b)
       Sovereign and supranational43 Consensus pricingOffered quotesN/A(c)
       Banks/financial institutions45 Consensus pricingOffered quotes100.00-103.00(a)
       Other corporate426 Discounted cash flowCredit spreads121 bps-560 bps(b)
  Equity securities173 Adjusted costPrivate financialsN/A(d)
            Total assets$1,471 
(a) N/A representsRepresents prices for securities where the Company receives unadjusted broker quotes and for which there is no transparency into the providers' valuation techniques or unobservable inputs.techniques.
(b) Inputs derived from U.S. long-term rates to accommodate long maturity nature of the Company's swapsActual or equivalent credit spreads in basis points.
(c) Inputs derived from Japan long-term rates to accommodate long maturity nature of the Company's swapsCategory represents a single security; range not applicable.

(d) Prices do not utilize credit spreads therefore range is not applicable.


141


145


The following is a discussion of the significant unobservable inputs or valuation techniques used in determining the fair value of securities and derivatives classified as Level 3.

Net Asset Value


Credit Spreads

The Company holds certain unlisted equity securities whose fair value is derived based on the financial statements published by the investee. These securitiesassets that are of a unique, specialized, and/or securitized nature that do not trade on a regular basis in an active market, which makes their fair values difficult to estimate. Most of these assets are managed by external asset managers and the valuations derivedCompany utilizes these managers for their expertise when evaluating various inputs used to determine the fair values for these assets, including identifying the appropriate credit or risk spread over risk-free interest rates that incorporates the unique nature or structure of the asset in the valuations. For those assets of a similar nature but not managed by external asset managers, the Company internally estimates the spreads and risk adjustments over risk-free interest rates that reflect the unique nature or structure of the asset as well as the current pricing environment and market conditions for comparable or related investments. Credit or risk spreads are dependentan important input needed to complete the discounted cash flow analyses used to estimate an investment’s fair value. Credit or risk spreads underlying these fair values are a significant, unobservable input whose derivation is based on the availabilityCompany’s evaluation of timely financial reportinga combination of the investee. Net asset value is an unobservable input inexternal manager’s expertise and knowledge, the determination of fair value ofcurrent pricing environment, and market conditions for the specific asset.
equity securities.

Offered Quotes

In circumstances where the Company's valuation model price is overridden because it implies a value that is not consistent with current market conditions, the Company will solicit bids from a limited number of brokers. The Company also receives unadjusted prices from brokers for certain of its mortgage and asset-backed securities. These quotes are non-binding but are reflective of valuation best estimates at that particular point in time. Offered quotes are an unobservable input in the determination of fair value of mortgage- and asset-backed securities, certain banks/financial institutions, certain other corporate, and equity securities investments.

Interest Rates and CDS SpreadsPrivate Financials

The Company invests in the debt and equity securities of private companies operating in the cancer, healthtech, insurtech, finance, internet of things, big data and analytics sectors. Due to their private and often small, startup nature, these companies rely on capital provided by institutional and private equity investors for their ongoing operations. They do not have public securities that trade on a regular basis in an active market, which makes their fair values difficult to estimate. The Company values these investments on a cost basis with appropriate adjustments made based on monitoring private financial information provided by these companies. Adjustments to valuations are generally made as new funding tranches are executed or if the financial information provided significantly changes indicating the need for impairment. This private financial information is unobservable and is a significant drivers ofdeterminant in the valuation of the foreign exchange swaps are interest rates and CDS spreads. Some of the Company's swaps have long maturities that increase the sensitivity of the swaps to interest rate fluctuations. For the Company's foreign exchange or cross currency swaps that are in a net asset position, an increase in yen interest rates (all other factors held constant) will decrease the presentfair value of the yen final settlement receivable (receive leg), thus decreasing the value of the swap as long as the derivative remains in a net asset position.these corporate venture investments.
Foreign exchange swaps also have a lump-sum final settlement of foreign exchange principal amounts at the termination of the swap. Assuming all other factors are held constant, an increase in yen interest rates will decrease the receive leg and decrease the net value of the swap. Likewise, holding all other factors constant, an increase in U.S. dollar interest rates will increase the swap's net value due to the decrease in the present value of the dollar final settlement payable (pay leg).
The extinguisher feature in most of the Company's VIE swaps results in a cessation of cash flows and no further payments between the parties to the swap in the event of a default on the referenced or underlying collateral. To price this feature, the Company applies the survival probability of the referenced entity to the projected cash flows. The survival probability uses the CDS spreads and recovery rates to adjust the present value of the cash flows. For extinguisher swaps with positive values, an increase in CDS spreads decreases the likelihood of receiving the final exchange payments and reduces the value of the swap.

For additional information on the Company's investments and financial instruments, see the accompanying Notes 1, 3 and 4.

6.     DEFERRED POLICY ACQUISITION COSTS AND INSURANCE EXPENSES
Consolidated policy acquisition costs deferred were $1.5$1.1 billion in 2019, 20182022, compared with $1.1 billion in 2021 and 2017.$1.2 billion in 2020. The following table presents a rollforward of deferred policy acquisition costs by segment for the years ended December 31.
2019 2018 20222021
(In millions)Japan U.S. Japan U.S.(In millions)JapanU.S.JapanU.S.
Deferred policy acquisition costs:         Deferred policy acquisition costs:
Balance, beginning of year $6,384
 $3,491
 $6,150
 $3,355
 Balance, beginning of year$6,233 $3,292 $6,991 $3,450 
Capitalization 825
 626
 833
 669
 Capitalization498 556 593 470 
Amortization (709) (573) (710) (534) Amortization(547)(605)(653)(517)
Foreign currency translation and other 84
 0
 111
 1
 Foreign currency translation and other(829)(5)(698)(111)
Balance, end of year $6,584
 $3,544
 $6,384
 $3,491
 Balance, end of year$5,355 $3,238 $6,233 $3,292 



146

Commissions deferred as a percentage of total acquisition costs deferred were 74%68% in 2019,2022, compared with 72%71% in both 20182021 and 2017.77% in 2020.

142




Personnel, compensation and benefit expenses as a percentage of insurance expenses were 60% in 2022, compared with 57% in 2019, compared with 54%2021 and 59% in 2018 and 56% in 2017.2020. Advertising expense, which is included in insurance expenses in the consolidated statements of earnings, was as follows for the years ended December 31:
(In millions)202220212020
Advertising expense:
Aflac Japan$77 $91 $72 
Aflac U.S.127 138 112 
          Total advertising expense$204 $229 $184 
(In millions)2019 2018 2017
Advertising expense:           
Aflac Japan $101
   $108
   $100
 
Aflac U.S. 118
   110
   110
 
          Total advertising expense $219
   $218
   $210
 


Depreciation and other amortization expenses, which are included in insurance expenses in the consolidated statements of earnings, were as follows for the years ended December 31:
(In millions)202220212020
Depreciation expense$40 $39 $36 
Other amortization expense5 
          Total depreciation and other amortization expense$45 $45 $41 
(In millions)2019 2018 2017
Depreciation expense $40
   $48
   $50
 
Other amortization expense 1
   1
   3
 
          Total depreciation and other amortization expense $41
   $49
   $53
 


7.     POLICY LIABILITIES
Policy liabilities consist of future policy benefits, unpaid policy claims, unearned premiums, and other policyholders' funds, which accounted for 85%86%, 4%5%, 4%2% and 7% of total policy liabilities at December 31, 2019,2022, respectively. The Company regularly reviews the adequacy of its policy liabilities in total and by component.
The liability for future policy benefits as of December 31 consisted of the following:
   Liability Amounts  Interest Rate Assumptions  
(In millions) 2019 2018    
Health insurance         
Japan $50,941
 $49,496
  0.6 - 6.75% 
U.S. 8,646
 8,442
  3.0 - 7.0  
Intercompany eliminations (532)
(1) 
(583)
(1) 
 2.0  
Life insurance         
Japan 30,520
 28,318
  1.0 - 4.5  
U.S. 760
 695
  2.5 - 6.0  
Total $90,335
 $86,368
     
  Liability AmountsInterest Rate Assumptions
(In millions)20222021
Health insurance
Japan$42,936 $49,421 0.6 - 6.75%
U.S.8,972 8,949 3.0 - 8.0
Intercompany eliminations (1)
(367)(456)2.0
Life insurance
Japan28,218 31,756 0.6 - 4.0
U.S.990 918 2.5 - 6.0
Total$80,749 $90,588 
(1) Elimination entry necessary due to recapture of a portion of policy liabilities ceded externally, as a result of the reinsurance retrocession transaction as described in Note 8 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

The weighted-average interest rates reflected in the consolidated statements of earnings for future policy benefits for Japanese policies were 3.2%3.0% in 2019,2022, compared with 3.3%3.1% in 2018both 2021 and 3.4% in 2017;2020; and for U.S. policies, 5.3%5.0% in 2019,2022, compared with 5.3%5.1% in 20182021 and 5.4%5.2% in 2017.2020.


143


147


Changes in the liability for unpaid policy claims were as follows for the years ended December 31:
(In millions)202220212020
Unpaid supplemental health claims, beginning of period$4,067 $4,389 $3,968 
Less reinsurance recoverables37 39 30 
Net balance, beginning of period4,030 4,350 3,938 
Add claims incurred during the period related to:
Current year6,412 6,969 7,179 
Prior years(633)(860)(540)
Total incurred5,779 6,109 6,639 
Less claims paid during the period on claims incurred during:
Current year3,973 4,356 4,488 
Prior years1,736 1,827 1,966 
Total paid5,709 6,183 6,454 
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on unpaid claims(289)(246)128 
Zurich acquisition0 99 
Net balance, end of period3,811 4,030 4,350 
Add reinsurance recoverables43 37 39 
Unpaid supplemental health claims, end of period3,854 4,067 4,389 
Unpaid life claims, end of period707 769 798 
Total liability for unpaid policy claims$4,561 $4,836 $5,187 
(In millions)2019 2018 2017
Unpaid supplemental health claims, beginning of period $3,952
   $3,884
   $3,707
 
Less reinsurance recoverables 27
   30
   27
 
Net balance, beginning of period 3,925
   3,854
   3,680
 
Add claims incurred during the period related to:           
Current year 7,216
   7,101
   6,979
 
Prior years (552)   (563)   (518) 
Total incurred 6,664
   6,538
   6,461
 
Less claims paid during the period on claims incurred during:           
Current year 4,715
   4,612
   4,530
 
Prior years 1,965
   1,898
   1,822
 
Total paid 6,680
   6,510
   6,352
 
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on unpaid claims 29
   43
   65
 
Net balance, end of period 3,938
   3,925
   3,854
 
Add reinsurance recoverables 30
   27
   30
 
Unpaid supplemental health claims, end of period 3,968
   3,952
   3,884
 
Unpaid life claims, end of period 691
   632
   508
 
Total liability for unpaid policy claims $4,659
   $4,584
   $4,392
 

The incurred claims development related to prior years reflects favorable claims experience compared to previous estimates. The favorable claims development of $552$633 million for 20192022 comprises approximately $395$373 million from Japan which representsand $260 million from the U.S., representing approximately 72%59% and 41% of the total.total, respectively. Excluding the impact of foreign exchange of a gainloss of approximately $5$57 million from December 31, 20182021 to December 31, 2019,2022, the favorable claims development in Japan would have been approximately $390$430 million, representing approximately 71%68% of the total.

The Company has experienced continued favorable claim trends in 20192020, 2021 and 2022 for its core health products in Japan. The Company'sDuring 2022, 2021, and 2020, there were impacts from lower utilization of healthcare services, due to the COVID-19 pandemic. This impacted both cancer and medical products, as the Japan population was avoiding doctor and hospital visits and staying home more. This resulted in lower sickness, accident, and cancer incurred claims. Although overall experience is favorable, during 2022, there was an increase in medical hospitalization claims related to COVID-19, mainly due to a wider scope of "deemed hospitalization" being utilized in Japan relatedthrough most of the first nine months of the year. In addition, dating back to before the average length of stay in the hospital for cancer treatment has shown continued decline in the current period. In addition,pandemic, cancer treatment patterns in Japan are continuing to be influenced by significant advances in early-detection techniques and by the increased use of pathological diagnosis rather than clinical exams. Additionally, follow-up radiation and chemotherapy treatments are occurring more often on an outpatient basis. Such changes in treatment not only increase the quality of life and initial outcomes for the patients but also decrease the average length of each hospital stay, resulting in favorable claims development.

In 2022, as experienced in 2021 and 2020, the incurred claims development related to prior years reflects favorable claims experience compared to previous estimates. The favorable claims trend continued for the majority of the Company's major U.S. accident and health lines of business, including accident, hospital indemnity, cancer, critical illness and short-term disability. Additionally, refinements for COVID-19 incurred estimates also contributed to the favorable development. The U.S. portion of the favorable claims development in 2022 includes $91 million related to refinements in the estimates for COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 claims as experience emerges.

As of December 31, 20192022 and 2018,2021, unearned premiums consisted primarily of discounted advance premiums on deposit. Discounted advance premiums are premiums on deposit from policyholders in conjunction with their purchase of certain Aflac Japan limited-pay insurance products. These advanced premiums are deferred upon collection and recognized as premium revenueearned premiums over the contractual premium payment period. These advanced premiums represented 64%49% of the December 31, 20192022 and 69%54% of the December 31, 20182021 unearned premiums balances.

As of December 31, 20192022 and 2018,2021, the largest component of the other policyholders' funds liability was the Company's annuity line of business in Aflac Japan. The Company's annuities have fixed benefits and premiums. These annuities represented 96% and 97% of other policyholders' funds liability at December 31, 20192022 and 2018.



2021, respectively.
144


148


8.     REINSURANCE

The Company periodically enters into fixed quota-share coinsurance agreements with other companies in the normal course of business. For each of its reinsurance agreements, the Company determines whether the agreement provides indemnification against loss or liability relating to insurance risk in accordance with applicable accounting standards. Reinsurance premiums and benefits paid or provided are accounted for on bases consistent with those used in accounting for the original policies issued and the terms of the reinsurance contracts. Premiums and benefits are reported net of insurance ceded.

The Company has recorded a deferred profit liability related to reinsurance transactions. The remaining deferred profit liability of $1.0 billion,$692 million and $859 million as of December 31, 2019,2022 and 2021, respectively, is included in future policy benefits in the consolidated balance sheet and is being amortized into income over the expected lives of the policies. The Company has also recorded a reinsurance recoverable for reinsurance transactions, which is included in other assets in the consolidated balance sheet and had a remaining balance of $970$846 million and $941$957 million as of December 31, 20192022 and 2018,2021, respectively. The increase in the reinsurance recoverable balance was driven by two aggregating factors: yen strengthening and the growth in reserves related to the business that has been reinsured as the policies age. The spot yen/dollar exchange rate strengthenedweakened by approximately 1.3%13.3% and ceded reserves increaseddecreased approximately 1.4%11.7% from December 31, 2018,2021 to December 31, 2019.2022.

The following table reconciles direct premium incomepremiums and direct benefits and claims to net amounts after the effect of reinsurance which also includes the elimination of inter-segment amounts associated with affiliated reinsurance for the years ended December 31.
(In millions)202220212020
Direct earned premiums$15,387 $17,857 $18,955 
Ceded to other companies:
    Ceded Aflac Japan closed blocks(343)(431)(466)
    Other(76)(73)(87)
Assumed from other companies:
    Retrocession activities144 180 195 
    Other151 114 25 
Net earned premiums$15,263 $17,647 $18,622 
Direct benefits and claims$9,255 $10,716 $12,080 
Ceded benefits and change in reserves for future benefits:
    Ceded Aflac Japan closed blocks(340)(379)(419)
    Eliminations23 31 39 
    Other(38)(36)(63)
Assumed from other companies:
    Retrocession activities145 165 180 
    Eliminations(23)(31)(39)
    Other131 110 18 
Benefits and claims, net$9,153 $10,576 $11,796 
(In millions)201920182017
Direct premium income $19,122
  $19,018
  $18,875
 
Ceded to other companies:         
    Ceded Aflac Japan closed blocks (478)  (497)  (515) 
    Other (69)  (58)  (51) 
Assumed from other companies:         
    Retrocession activities 200
  208
  216
 
    Other 5
  6
  6
 
Net premium income $18,780
  $18,677
  $18,531
 
          
Direct benefits and claims $12,237
  $12,293
  $12,486
 
Ceded benefits and change in reserves for future benefits:         
    Ceded Aflac Japan closed blocks (433)  (450)  (473) 
    Eliminations 41
  43
  51
 
    Other (57)  (44)  (44) 
Assumed from other companies:         
    Retrocession activities 194
  209
  209
 
    Eliminations (41)  (53)  (51) 
    Other 1
  2
  3
 
Benefits and claims, net $11,942
  $12,000
  $12,181
 


These reinsurance transactions are indemnity reinsurance that do not relieve the Company from its obligations to policyholders. In the event that the reinsurer is unable to meet their obligations, the Company remains liable for the reinsured claims.

As a part of its capital contingency plan, the Company entered into a committed reinsurance facility agreement on December 1, 2015, in the amountwith reserves of approximately ¥110¥120 billion as of reserves.December 31, 2022. This reinsurance facility agreement was renewed in 20192022 and is effective until December 31, 2020.2023. There are also additional commitment periods of a one-year duration each of which are automatically extended unless notification is received from the reinsurer within 60 days prior to the expiration. The reinsurer can withdraw from the committed facility if Aflac‘s Standard and Poor's (S&P) rating drops below BBB-. As of December 31, 2019,2022, the Company had not executed a reinsurance treaty under this committed reinsurance facility.

145

149


9.     NOTES PAYABLE AND LEASE OBLIGATIONS
A summary of notes payable and lease obligations as of December 31 follows:
(In millions)2019 2018
4.00% senior notes due February 2022 (1)
 $348
   $348
 
3.625% senior notes due June 2023 698
   698
 
3.625% senior notes due November 2024 747
   746
 
3.25% senior notes due March 2025 448
   447
 
2.875% senior notes due October 2026 298
   297
 
6.90% senior notes due December 2039 220
   220
 
6.45% senior notes due August 2040 254
   254
 
4.00% senior notes due October 2046 394
   394
 
4.750% senior notes due January 2049 541
   540
 
Yen-denominated senior notes and subordinated debentures:       
.932% senior notes due January 2027 (principal amount ¥60.0 billion) 545
   538
 
.500% senior notes due December 2029 (principal amount ¥12.6 billion) 114
   0
 
1.159% senior notes due October 2030 (principal amount ¥29.3 billion) 266
   262
 
.843% senior notes due December 2031 (principal amount ¥9.3 billion) 84
   0
 
1.488% senior notes due October 2033 (principal amount ¥15.2 billion) 138
   136
 
.934% senior notes due December 2034 (principal amount ¥9.8 billion) 88
   0
 
1.750% senior notes due October 2038 (principal amount ¥8.9 billion) 81
   79
 
1.122% senior notes due December 2039 (principal amount ¥6.3 billion) 57
   0
 
2.108% subordinated debentures due October 2047 (principal amount ¥60.0 billion) 543
   536
 
.963% subordinated bonds due April 2049 (principal amount ¥30.0 billion) 272
   0
 
Yen-denominated loans:       
Variable interest rate loan due September 2026 (.42% in 2019 and .32% in 2018, principal amount ¥5.0 billion) 45
   45
 
Variable interest rate loan due September 2029 (.57% in 2019 and .47% in 2018, principal amount ¥25.0 billion) 227
   225
 
Finance lease obligations payable through 2026 12
   13
 
Operating lease obligations payable through 2049 (2)
 149
   0
 
Total notes payable and lease obligations $6,569
   $5,778
 

(1) Redeemed in January 2020
(2) See Note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the adoption of accounting guidance on January 1, 2019 related to leases.
(In millions)20222021
3.625% senior notes paid September 20220 748 
3.25% senior notes paid October 20220 448 
1.125% senior sustainability notes due March 2026397 397 
2.875% senior notes due October 2026298 298 
3.60% senior notes due April 2030992 991 
6.90% senior notes due December 2039221 221 
6.45% senior notes due August 2040254 255 
4.00% senior notes due October 2046394 394 
4.750% senior notes due January 2049541 541 
Yen-denominated senior notes and subordinated debentures:
.300% senior notes due September 2025 (principal amount ¥12.4 billion)93 107 
.932% senior notes due January 2027 (principal amount ¥60.0 billion)450 520 
1.075% senior notes due September 2029 (principal amount ¥33.4 billion)250 
.500% senior notes due December 2029 (principal amount ¥12.6 billion)95 109 
.550% senior notes due March 2030 (principal amount ¥13.3 billion)99 115 
1.159% senior notes due October 2030 (principal amount ¥29.3 billion)220 254 
.633% senior notes due April 2031 (principal amount ¥30.0 billion)225 259 
.843% senior notes due December 2031 (principal amount ¥9.3 billion)70 81 
.750% senior notes due March 2032 (principal amount ¥20.7 billion)155 179 
1.320% senior notes due December 2032 (principal amount ¥21.1 billion)158 
.844% senior notes due April 2033 (principal amount ¥12.0 billion)90 104 
1.488% senior notes due October 2033 (principal amount ¥15.2 billion)114 131 
.934% senior notes due December 2034 (principal amount ¥9.8 billion)73 85 
.830% senior notes due March 2035 (principal amount ¥10.6 billion)79 91 
1.039% senior notes due April 2036 (principal amount ¥10.0 billion)75 86 
1.594% senior notes due September 2037 (principal amount ¥6.5 billion)49 
1.750% senior notes due October 2038 (principal amount ¥8.9 billion)66 77 
1.122% senior notes due December 2039 (principal amount ¥6.3 billion)47 54 
1.264% senior notes due April 2041 (principal amount ¥10.0 billion)75 86 
2.108% subordinated debentures due October 2047 (principal amount ¥60.0 billion)448 517 
.963% subordinated bonds due April 2049 (principal amount ¥30.0 billion)226 260 
1.560% senior notes due April 2051 (principal amount ¥20.0 billion)149 172 
2.144% senior notes due September 2052 (principal amount ¥12.0 billion)90 
Yen-denominated loans:
Variable interest rate loan due August 2027 (.33% in 2022, principal amount ¥11.7 billion)88 
Variable interest rate loan due August 2029 (.43% in 2022 and .41% in 2021,
  principal amount ¥25.3 billion in 2022 and ¥5.0 billion in 2021)
190 43 
Variable interest rate loan due August 2032 (.58% in 2022 and .56% in 2021,
  principal amount ¥70.0 billion in 2022 and ¥25.0 billion in 2021)
524 216 
Finance lease obligations payable through 20288 12 
Operating lease obligations payable through 2049139 105 
Total notes payable and lease obligations$7,442 $7,956 
Amounts in the table above are reported net of debt issuance costs and issuance premiums or discounts, if applicable, that are being amortized over the life of the notes.



150


In September 2022, the Parent Company issued four series of senior notes totaling ¥73.0 billion through a public debt offering under its U.S. shelf registration statement. The first series, which totaled ¥33.4 billion, bears interest at a fixed rate of 1.075% per annum, payable semi-annually, and will mature in September 2029. The second series, which totaled ¥21.1 billion, bears interest at a fixed rate of 1.320% per annum, payable semi-annually, and will mature in December 2032. The third series, which totaled ¥6.5 billion, bears interest at a fixed rate of 1.594% per annum, payable semi-annually, and will mature in September 2037. The fourth series, which totaled ¥12.0 billion, bears interest at a fixed rate of 2.144% per annum, payable semi-annually, and will mature in September 2052. These notes are redeemable at the Parent Company’s option at any time, in whole but not in part, upon the occurrence of certain changes affecting U.S. taxation, as specified in the indenture governing the terms of the issuance. In addition, the notes maturing in September 2029, December 2032 and September 2037 are redeemable at the Parent Company's option, in whole or in part from time to time, on or after June 14, 2029, June 14, 2032 and March 14, 2037, respectively, at a redemption price equal to the aggregate principal amount of the applicable series to be redeemed plus accrued and unpaid interest on the principal amount to be redeemed to, but excluding, the date of redemption.

In August 2022, the Parent Company renewed a senior term loan facility with a commitment amount totaling ¥107.0 billion. The first tranche of the facility, which totaled ¥11.7 billion, bears interest at a rate per annum equal to the Tokyo interbank market rate (TIBOR), or alternate TIBOR, if applicable, plus the applicable TIBOR margin and will mature in August 2027. The applicable margin ranges between .225% and .625%, depending on the Parent Company's debt ratings as of the date of determination. The second tranche, which totaled ¥25.3 billion, bears interest at a rate per annum equal to TIBOR, or alternate TIBOR, if applicable, plus the applicable TIBOR margin and will mature in August 2029. The applicable margin ranges between .325% and .725%, depending on the Parent Company's debt ratings as of the date of determination. The third tranche, which totaled ¥70.0 billion, bears interest at a rate per annum equal to TIBOR, or alternate TIBOR, if applicable, plus the applicable TIBOR margin and will mature in August 2032. The applicable margin ranges between .475% and 1.025%, depending on the Parent Company's debt ratings as of the date of determination.

In April 2021, the Parent Company issued five series of senior notes totaling ¥82.0 billion through a public debt offering under its then existing U.S. shelf registration statement. The first series, which totaled ¥30.0 billion, bears interest at a fixed rate of .633% per annum, payable semi-annually, and will mature in April 2031. The second series, which totaled ¥12.0 billion, bears interest at a fixed rate of .844% per annum, payable semi-annually, and will mature in April 2033. The third series, which totaled ¥10.0 billion, bears interest at a fixed rate of 1.039% per annum, payable semi-annually, and will mature in April 2036. The fourth series, which totaled ¥10.0 billion, bears interest at a fixed rate of 1.264% per annum, payable semi-annually, and will mature in April 2041. The fifth series, which totaled ¥20.0 billion, bears interest at a fixed rate of 1.560% per annum, payable semi-annually, and will mature in April 2051. The notes are redeemable at the Parent Company’s option (i) at any time, in whole but not in part, upon the occurrence of certain changes affecting U.S. taxation, as specified in the indenture governing the terms of the issuance or (ii) on or after the date that is six months prior to the stated maturity date of the series, in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to the aggregate principal amount to be redeemed plus accrued and unpaid interest on the principal amount to be redeemed to, but excluding, the date of redemption.

In March 2021, the Parent Company issued $400 million of senior sustainability notes through a U.S. public debt offering. The notes bear interest at a fixed rate of 1.125% per annum, payable semi-annually, and will mature in March 2026. The Company intends, but is not contractually committed, to allocate an amount at least equivalent to the net proceeds from this issuance exclusively to existing or future investments in, or financing of, assets, businesses or projects that meet the eligibility criteria of the Company's sustainability bond framework described in the offering documentation in connection with such notes. These notes are redeemable at the Parent Company's option in whole at any time or in part from time to time at a redemption price equal to the greater of: (i) the aggregate principal amount of the notes to be redeemed or (ii) the amount equal to the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments for principal of and interest on the notes to be redeemed, not including any portion of the payments of interest accrued as of such redemption date, discounted to such redemption date on a semiannual basis at the yield to maturity for a U.S. Treasury security with a maturity comparable to the remaining term of the notes, plus 10 basis points, plus in each case, accrued and unpaid interest on the principal amount of the notes to be redeemed to, but excluding, such redemption date.



151

In April 2020, the Parent Company issued $1.0 billion of senior notes through a U.S. public debt offering. The notes bear interest at a fixed rate of 3.60% per annum, payable semi-annually, and will mature in April 2030. These notes are redeemable at the Parent Company's option in whole at any time or in part from time to time at a redemption price equal to the greater of: (i) the aggregate principal amount of the notes to be redeemed or (ii) the amount equal to the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments for principal of and interest on the notes to be redeemed, not including any portion of the payments of interest accrued as of such redemption date, discounted to such redemption date on a semiannual basis at the yield to maturity for a U.S. Treasury security with a maturity comparable to the remaining term of the notes, plus 45 basis points, plus in each case, accrued and unpaid interest on the principal amount of the notes to be redeemed to, but excluding, such redemption date.

In March 2020, the Parent Company issued four series of senior notes totaling ¥57.0 billion through a public debt offering under its then existing U.S. shelf registration statement. The first series, which totaled ¥12.4 billion, bears interest at a fixed rate of .300% per annum, payable semi-annually and will mature in September 2025. The second series, which totaled ¥13.3 billion, bears interest at a fixed rate of .550% per annum, payable semi-annually, and will mature in March 2030. The third series, which totaled ¥20.7 billion, bears interest at a fixed rate of .750% per annum, payable semi-annually and will mature in March 2032. The fourth series, which totaled ¥10.6 billion, bears interest at a fixed rate of .830% per annum, payable semi-annually, and will mature in March 2035. These notes may only be redeemed before maturity, in whole but not in part, upon the occurrence of certain changes affecting U.S. taxation, as specified in the indenture governing the terms of the issuance.

In December 2019, the Parent Company issued 4four series of senior notes totaling ¥38.0 billion through a public debt offering under its then existing U.S. shelf registration statement. The first series, which totaled ¥12.6 billion, bears interest at a fixed rate of .500% per annum, payable semi-annually, and will mature in December 2029. The second series, which totaled ¥9.3 billion, bears interest at a fixed rate of .843% per annum, payable semi-annually, and will mature in December 2031. The third series, which totaled ¥9.8 billion, bears interest at a fixed rate of .934% per annum, payable semi-annually, and will mature in December 2034. The fourth series, which totaled ¥6.3 billion, bears interest at a fixed rate of 1.122% per annum, payable semi-annually, and will mature in December 2039. TheseThe notes may only be redeemed before maturity,are redeemable at the Parent Company’s option (i) at any time, in whole but not in part, upon the occurrence of certain changes affecting U.S. taxation, as specified in the indenture governing the terms of the issuance.

In September 2019,issuance or (ii) on or after the Parent Company renewed a ¥30.0 billion senior term loan facility. The first tranchedate that is six months prior to the stated maturity date of the facility, which totaled ¥5.0 billion, bears interestseries, in whole or in part, at a rate per annumredemption price equal to the Tokyo interbank market rate (TIBOR), or alternate TIBOR, if applicable,aggregate principal amount to be redeemed plus the applicable TIBOR marginaccrued and will mature in September 2026. The applicable margin ranges between .30% and .70%, dependingunpaid interest on the Parent Company's debt ratings as ofprincipal amount to be redeemed to, but excluding, the date of determination. The second tranche, which totaled ¥25.0 billion, bears interest at a rate per annum equal to the TIBOR, or alternate TIBOR, if applicable,

146



redemption.
plus the applicable TIBOR margin
and will mature in September 2029. The applicable margin ranges between .45% and 1.00%, depending on the Parent Company's debt ratings as of the date of determination.

In April 2019, ALIJ issued ¥30.0 billion (par value) of perpetual subordinated bonds. These bonds bear interest at a fixed rate of .963% per annum and then at six-month Euro Yen LIBOR plus an applicable spread on and after the day immediately following April 18, 2024. The bonds will be callable on each interest payment date on and after April 18, 2024. In November 2019, ALIJ amended the bonds to change their duration from perpetual to a stated maturity date of April 16, 2049 and to remove provisions that permitted ALIJ to defer payments of interest under certain circumstances.

In October 2018, the Parent Company issued $550 million of senior notes through a U.S. public debt offering. The notes bear interest at a fixed rate of 4.750% per annum, payable semi-annually, and will mature in January 2049. These notes are redeemable at the Parent Company's option in whole at any time or in part from time to time at a redemption price equal to the greater of: (i) the aggregate principal amount of the notes to be redeemed or (ii) the amount equal to the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments for principal of and interest on the notes to be redeemed, not including any portion of the payments of interest accrued as of such redemption date, discounted to such redemption date on a semiannual basis at the yield to maturity for a U.S.TreasuryU.S. Treasury security with a maturity comparable to the remaining term of the notes, plus 25 basis points, plus in each case, accrued and unpaid interest on the principal amount of the notes to be redeemed to, but excluding, such redemption date.

In October 2018, the Parent Company issued 3three series of senior notes totaling ¥53.4 billion through a public debt offering under its then existing U.S. shelf registration statement. The first series, which totaled ¥29.3 billion, bears interest at a fixed rate of 1.159% per annum, payable semi-annually, and will mature in October 2030. The second series, which totaled ¥15.2 billion, bears interest at a fixed rate of 1.488% per annum, payable semi-annually, and will mature in October 2033. The third series, which totaled ¥8.9 billion, bears interest at a fixed rate of 1.750% per annum, payable semi-annually, and will mature in October 2038. These notes may only be redeemed before maturity, in whole but not in part, upon the occurrence of certain changes affecting U.S. taxation, as specified in the indenture governing the terms of the issuance.

In October 2017, the Parent Company issued ¥60.0 billion of subordinated debentures through a U.S. public debt offering. The debentures bear interest at an initial rate of 2.108% per annum through October 22, 2027, or earlier redemption.


152

Thereafter, the rate of the interest of the debentures will be reset every five years at a rate of interest equal to the then-current JPY 5-year Swap Offered Rate plus 205 basis points. The debentures are payable semi-annually in arrears and will mature in October 2047. The debentures are redeemable (i) at any time, in whole but not in part, upon the occurrence of certain tax events or certain rating agency events, as specified in the indenture governing the terms of the debentures or (ii) on or after October 23, 2027, in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to their principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the date of redemption.

In January 2017, the Parent Company issued ¥60.0 billion of senior notes through a U.S. public debt offering. The notes bear interest at a fixed rate of .932% per annum, payable semi-annually, and will mature in January 2027. These notes may only be redeemed before maturity, in whole but not in part, upon the occurrence of certain changes affecting U.S. taxation, as specified in the indenture governing the terms of the issuance.

In September 2016, the Parent Company issued 2two series of senior notes totaling $700 million through a U.S. public debt offering. The first series, which totaled $300 million, bears interest at a fixed rate of 2.875% per annum, payable semi-annually and will mature in October 2026. The second series, which totaled $400 million, bears interest at a fixed rate of 4.00% per annum, payable semi-annually, and will mature in October 2046.

In March 2015, the Parent Company issued $450 million of senior notes through a U.S. public debt offering. The notes bear interest at a fixed rate of 3.25% per annum, payable semi-annually, and will mature in March 2025. The Parent Company entered into cross-currency swaps that convert the U.S. dollar-denominated principal and interest on the senior notes into yen-denominated obligations which results in lower nominal net interest rates on the debt. By entering into these cross-currency swaps, the Parent Company economically converted its $450 million liability into a ¥55.0 billion yen liability and reduced the interest rate on this debt from 3.25% in dollars to .82% in yen.

In October 2022, the Parent Company used a portion of the net proceeds from its September 2022 issuance of various series of senior notes to redeem $450 million of its 3.25% senior notes due March 2025.

In November 2014, the Parent Company issued $750 million of senior notes through a U.S. public debt offering. The notes bear interest at a fixed rate of 3.625% per annum, payable semi-annually, and will mature in November 2024. These notes are redeemable at the Parent Company's option in whole at any time or in part from time to time at a redemption price equal to the greater of: (i) the aggregate principal amount of the notes to be redeemed or (ii) the amount equal to the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments for principal of and interest on the notes to be redeemed, not including any portion of the payments of interest accrued as of such redemption date, discounted to such redemption date on a semiannual basis at the treasury rate plus 20 basis points, plus in each case, accrued and unpaid interest on the principal

147



amount of the notes to be redeemed to, but excluding, such redemption date. The Parent Company entered into cross-currency interest rate swaps to reduce interest expense by converting the U.S. dollar-denominated principal and interest on the senior notes it issued into yen-denominated obligations. By entering into the swaps, the Parent Company economically converted its $750 million liability into an ¥85.3 billion liability and reduced the interest rate on this debt from 3.625% in dollars to 1.00% in yen.

In June 2013, the Parent Company issued $700 million of senior notes through a U.S. public debt offering. The notes bear interest at a fixed rate of 3.625% per annum, payable semi-annually, and will mature in June 2023. These notes are redeemable at the Parent Company's option in whole at any time or in part from time to time at a redemption price equal to the greater of: (i) the aggregate principal amount of the notes to be redeemed or (ii) the amount equal to the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments for principal of and interest on the notes to be redeemed, not including any portion of the payments of interest accrued as of such redemption date, discounted to such redemption date on a semiannual basis at the treasury rate plus 20 basis points, plus in each case, accrued and unpaid interest on the principal amount of the notes to be redeemed to, but excluding, such redemption date. The Parent Company had entered into cross-currency interest rate swaps to reduce interest expense by converting the U.S. dollar-denominated principal and interest on the senior notes it issued into yen-denominated obligations. By entering into these swaps, the Parent Company economically converted its $700 million liability into a ¥69.8 billion liability and reduced the interest rate on this debt from 3.625% in dollars to 1.50% in yen.

In February 2012, the Parent Company issued $350 million of senior notes through a U.S. public debt offering. The notes bear interest at a fixed rate of 4.00% per annum, payable semiannually, and will mature in February 2022. These notes are redeemable at the Parent Company's option in whole at any time or in part from time to time at a redemption price equal to the greater of: (i) the principal amount of the notes or (ii) the present value of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest to be redeemed, discounted to the redemption date, plus accrued and unpaid interest. The Parent Company entered into cross-currency interest rate swaps to reduce interest expense by converting the U.S. dollar-denominated principal and interest on the senior notes it issued into yen-denominated obligations. By entering into thesethe swaps, the Parent Company economically converted its $350$750 million liability into a ¥27.0an ¥85.3 billion liability and reduced the interest rate on this debt from 4.00%3.625% in dollars to 2.07%1.00% in yen. In September 2022, the Parent Company used a portion of the net proceeds from its September 2022 issuance of various series of senior notes and the August 2022 senior term loan facility to redeem $750 million of its 3.625% senior notes due November 2024.

In 2010 and 2009, the Parent Company issued senior notes through U.S. public debt offerings; the details of these notes are as follows. In August 2010, the Parent Company issued $450 million of senior notes that will mature in August 2040. In December 2009, the Parent Company issued $400 million of senior notes that will mature in December 2039. These senior notes pay interest semiannually and are redeemable at the Parent Company's option in whole at any time or in part from time to time at a redemption price equal to the greater of: (i) the principal amount of the notes or (ii) the present value of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest to be redeemed, discounted to the redemption date, plus accrued and unpaid interest. In December 2016, the Parent Company completed a tender offer in which it extinguished $176 million principal of its 6.90% senior notes due December 2039 and $193 million principal of its 6.45% senior notes due August 2040. The pretax loss due to the early redemption of these notes was $137 million.

For the Company's yen-denominated notes and loans, the principal amount as stated in dollar terms will fluctuate from period to period due to changes in the yen/dollar exchange rate. The Company has designated the majority of its yen-denominated notes payable as a nonderivativenon-derivative hedge of the foreign currency exposure of the Company's investment in Aflac Japan.



153

The aggregate contractual maturities of notes payable during each of the years after December 31, 2019,2022, are as follows:
(In millions)Total
Notes
Payable
2023$
2024
202593 
2026700 
2027540 
Thereafter6,021 
Total$7,354 
(In millions)Total
Notes
Payable
2020 $0
 
2021 0
 
2022 350
 
2023 700
 
2024 750
 
Thereafter 4,658
 
Total $6,458
 



148



The following table presents the contractual maturities and present value of lease liabilities as of December 31.
 2019
(In millions)Operating Leases Finance Leases Total
2020$49
 $4
 $53
202137
 3
 40
202231
 2
 33
202310
 2
 12
202410
 1
 11
After 202422
 0
 22
Total lease payments$159
 $12
 $171
Less: Interest10
 0
 10
Present value of lease liabilities$149
 $12
 $161


The following table presents the weighted average remaining lease term and weighted average discount rate for lease liabilities as of December 31.
2019
Weighted average remaining lease term (years):
Operating leases6.8
Finance leases3.7
Weighted average discount rate:
Operating leases2.1%
Finance leases1.5%


Operating lease costs, included in insurance expenses in the consolidated statements of earnings, were $54$52 million, $73$58 million and $75$56 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021 and 2017,2020, respectively. Operating cash outflowoutflows for operating leases was $52were $49 million, $56 million and $54 million for the yearyears ended December 31, 2019.2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.



149


154


A summary of the Company's lines of credit as of December 31, 20192022 follows:
BorrowerBorrower(s)TypeOriginal TermExpiration DateCapacityAmount OutstandingInterest Rate on Borrowed AmountMaturity PeriodCommitment FeeBusiness Purpose
Aflac Incorporated
and Aflac
uncommitted bilateral364 daysDecember 18, 202028, 2023$100 million$0 millionThe rate quoted by the bank and agreed upon at the time of borrowingUp to 3 monthsNoneGeneral corporate purposes
Aflac Incorporatedunsecured revolving5 yearsMarch 29,May 9,
2024,2027, or the date commitments are terminated pursuant to an event of default
¥100.0 billion¥0.0 billionA rate per annum equal to (a) Tokyo interbank market rate (TIBOR)TIBOR plus, the alternative applicable TIBOR margin during the availability period from the closing date to the commitment termination date or (b) the TIBOR rate offered by the agent to major banks in yen for the applicable period plus, the applicable alternative TIBOR margin during the term out periodNo later than
March 29, 2024May 10, 2027
.30%.28% to .50%.45%, depending on the Parent Company's debt ratings as of the date of determinationGeneral corporate purposes, including a capital contingency plan for the operations of the Parent Company
Aflac Incorporated
and Aflac
unsecured revolving5 yearsNovember 18, 2024,15, 2027, or the date commitments are terminated pursuant to an event of default$1.0 billion$0.0 billionA rate per annum equal to, at the Company's option, either, (a) the rateSecured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) for EurocurrencyU.S. dollar denominated borrowings or TIBOR for depositsJapanese yen denominated borrowings, in the London interbank marketeither case adjusted for a period of one, two, three or six months (LIBOR)certain costs, or (b) a base rate determined by reference to the highest of (1) the federal funds rate plus 1/2 of 1%, (2) the rate of interest in effect for such day as publicly announced from time to time by Mizuhothe agent as its “prime rate”, andprime rate, or (3) the LIBORSOFR for aan interest period of one month interest period in effect on such day (or if such day is not a business day, the immediately preceding business day) plus 1.00%, and in each case plus an applicable marginNo later than November 18, 202415, 2027.085%
.08% to
.225%
.20%, depending on the Parent Company's debt ratings as of the date of determination
General corporate purposes, including a capital contingency plan for the operations of the Parent Company
Aflac Incorporated
and Aflac
uncommitted bilateralNone specifiedNone specified$50 million$0 millionA rate per annum equal to, at the Parent Company's option, either (a) a eurocurrency rate determined by reference to the agent'sUSD LIBOR for the interest period relevant to such borrowing or (b) the base rate determined by reference to the greaterhighest of (i)(a) the primelender's USD short-term commercial loan rate, as determined by the agent, and (ii) the sum of 0.50% and(b) the federal funds rate for such dayplus 1/2 of 1% and (c) USD one-month LIBOR plus 1%. USD LIBOR is subject to replacement with SOFR under certain circumstancesUp to 3 monthsNoneGeneral corporate purposes
Aflac(1)
uncommitted revolving364 daysNovember 30, 20202023$250 million$0 millionUSD three-month LIBOR plus 75 basis points per annum3 monthsNo later than December 1, 2023NoneGeneral corporate purposes
Aflac Incorporated(1)
(Tranche 1)
uncommitted revolving364 daysApril 2, 2020November 27, 2023¥50.0 billion¥0.0 billionThree-month TIBOR plus 7045 basis points per annum3 monthsNo later than November 28, 2023NoneGeneral corporate purposes
Aflac Incorporated(1)
(Tranche 2)
uncommitted revolving364 daysNovember 25, 202027, 2023¥50.0 billion¥0.0 billionThree-month TIBOR plus 7045 basis points per annum3 monthsNo later than November 28, 2023NoneGeneral corporate purposes
Aflac New York(1)
uncommitted revolving364 daysApril 10,
2023
$25 million$0 millionUSD three-month LIBOR plus 75 basis points per annumNo later than
April 11, 2023
NoneGeneral corporate purposes
CAIC(1)
uncommitted revolving364 daysMarch 21,
2023
$15 million$0 millionUSD three-month LIBOR plus 75 basis points per annumNo later than March 22, 2023NoneGeneral corporate purposes

(1) Intercompany credit agreement
(continued)


155

Borrower(s)TypeTermExpiration DateCapacityAmount OutstandingInterest Rate on Borrowed AmountMaturity PeriodCommitment FeeBusiness Purpose
Tier One Insurance Company(1)
uncommitted revolving364 daysMarch 21,
2023
$0.3 million$0 millionUSD three-month LIBOR plus 75 basis points per annumNo later than
March 22, 2023
NoneGeneral corporate purposes
Aflac Ventures
Japan K.K.(1)
uncommitted revolving364 daysMay 2,
2023
¥500 million¥350 millionA rate per annum equal to the short-term prime lending rates of banks appearing on the website for the Bank of Japan on the first day of the applicable periodNo later than
May 3, 2023
NoneGeneral corporate purposes
Hatch Healthcare
K.K.(1)
uncommitted revolving364 days
January 3,
2023 (2)
¥900 million¥0 millionA rate per annum equal to the short-term prime lending rates of banks appearing on the website for the Bank of Japan on the first day of the applicable periodNo later than January 4, 2023NoneGeneral corporate purposes
Hatch Insight K.K.(1)
uncommitted revolving364 days
January 3,
2023 (2)
¥600 million¥0 millionA rate per annum equal to the short-term prime lending rates of banks appearing on the website for the Bank of Japan on the first day of the applicable periodNo later than January 4, 2023NoneGeneral corporate purposes
Aflac GI Holdings LLC(1)
uncommitted revolving364 daysJuly 17,
2023
$30 million$0 millionUSD three-month LIBOR plus 75 basis points per annumNo later than
July 18, 2023
NoneGeneral corporate purposes
(1) Intercompany credit agreement
(2) Renewed in January 2023 with an expiration date of January 3, 2024

The Parent Company was in compliance with all of the covenants of its notes payable and lines of credit at December 31, 2019.2022. No events of default or defaults occurred during 20192022 and 2018.


2021.
150


156


10.     INCOME TAXES
The components of income tax expense (benefit) applicable to pretax earnings for the years ended December 31 were as follows:
(In millions)ForeignU.S.Total
2022:
Current$913 $268 $1,181 
Deferred200 (978)(778)
Total income tax expense$1,113 $(710)$403 
2021:
Current$884 $211 $1,095 
Deferred251 (349)(98)
Total income tax expense$1,135 $(138)$997 
2020:
Current$822 $(28)$794 
Deferred(28)(1,385)(1,413)
Total income tax expense$794 $(1,413)$(619)
(In millions)Foreign U.S. Total
2019:           
Current $737
   $69
   $806
 
Deferred 183
   152
   335
 
Total income tax expense $920
   $221
   $1,141
 
2018:           
Current $771
   $608
   $1,379
 
Deferred 93
   (409)   (316) 
Total income tax expense $864
   $199
   $1,063
 
2017:           
Current $722
   $(91)   $631
 
Deferred (24)   (1,193)   (1,217) 
Total income tax expense $698
   $(1,284)   $(586) 


The Japan income tax rate for the fiscal year 2017years 2022, 2021 and 2020 was 28.2%28.0%.

Aflac Japan holds certain U.S. dollar-denominated assets in a Delaware Statutory Trust (DST). These assets are mostly comprised of various U.S. dollar-denominated commercial mortgage loans. The ratefunctional currency of the DST for U.S. tax purposes was reduced to 28.0% for fiscal years 2018 and 2019.

Forhistorically the U.S.,Japanese yen. In 2022, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (Tax Act) was signed into law on December 22, 2017. Effective January 1, 2018, the Tax Act imposedCompany requested a broad number of changeschange in tax law, including permanently reducingaccounting method through the Internal Revenue Service's automatic consent procedures to change its functional currency on the DST for U.S. tax purposes to the U.S. federal statutory corporate incomedollar. As a result, foreign currency translation gains or losses on assets held in the DST will no longer be recognized for U.S. tax rate from 35% to 21%, eliminating or reducing certain deductions and credits and limitingpurposes. The Company historically recorded a deferred tax liability for foreign currency translation gains on the deductibilityDST assets, which was released in the third quarter of interest expense and executive compensation.
In accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin 118 (SAB 118) issued by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission in December 2017, the Company recorded provisional amounts for certain items for which the income tax accounting was not complete. As2022 as a result of the enactment date, the Company estimated provisional amountsfunctional currency change and subsequently adjusted for its deferred taxes, including related valuation allowance, resulting in a reduction of its DTAs by approximately $1.0 billion and its deferred tax liabilities (DTLs) by $2.9 billion, for a net DTL reduction of approximately $1.9 billion. The provisions of ASC 740-10, Income Taxes, require that the effects of changes in tax law on deferred taxes be recognized as a component of the income tax provision in the period the tax rate change was enacted. Therefore, the $1.9 billion provisional amount of net DTL reduction was recordedforeign currency impacts in the fourth quarter of 2017 as a reduction2022. This change in functional currency resulted in the “IncomeCompany recognizing an income tax expense, Deferred” line itembenefit of $452 million ($0.71 per basic and diluted share, respectively) in 2022.

In August 2022, the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (IRA) was signed into U.S. law. Effective January 1, 2023, the law imposes a 15% corporate alternative minimum tax rate and a 1% excise tax on the Company’s repurchases of its common stock. The Company does not anticipate any impacts from the new corporate minimum tax rate since its current tax rate is above the 15% minimum rate. Further, the Company expects the charges associated with the excise tax to be recognized in equity consistent with other costs related to treasury stock.

In September 2020, the U.S. Treasury and Internal Revenue Service issued Final and Proposed Regulations which address, among other items, the allocation of insurance expenses in the calculation of the foreign tax credit limitation. These regulations clarify how insurance related expenses are allocated and apportioned for this purpose. The Company had previously established valuation allowances on deferred foreign tax credits due to the uncertainty that previously existed. Under the guidance of these regulations, the Company recognized a one-time income tax benefit of $1.4 billion due to the release of these valuation allowances which were predominantly established on the Company’s deferred foreign tax credit benefits. The Company has determined that this will also reduce its effective tax rate in future periods, subject to any future changes in U.S. tax policy.

In March 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act was signed into law and includes certain income tax provisions relevant to businesses. The Company was required to recognize the effect on the consolidated financial statements in the period the law was enacted, which was the period ended March 31, 2020. For the year ended December 31, 2020, the CARES Act did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated statement of earnings.

In 2018, the Company recorded additional income tax expense of $.4 million resulting from a decrease in the SAB 118 provisional estimate related to Japan deferred tax balances. No further adjustment was made to the SAB 118 provisional estimate related to the valuation allowance. As of December 31, 2018, the Company has completed its accounting for the Tax Act in accordance with SAB 118.

financial statements. Income tax expense in the accompanying statements of earnings varies from the amount computed by applying the expected U.S. tax rate of 21% in both 20192022, 2021 and 2018 and 35% in 20172020 to pretax earnings.



157

The principal reasons for the differences and the related tax effects for the years ended December 31 were as follows:

(In millions)202220212020
Income taxes based on U.S. statutory rates$967 $1,118 $873 
Valuation allowance release0 (1,411)
DST functional currency change(452)
Other, net(112)(121)(81)
Income tax expense$403 $997 $(619)
(In millions)2019 2018 2017
Income taxes based on U.S. statutory rates $933
   $836
   $1,406
 
Foreign rate differential 229

 
220
   0
 
Write-down of U.S. deferred tax liabilities for tax reform change 0
   0
   (1,933) 
Utilization of foreign tax credit (6)   (3)   (27) 
Nondeductible expenses 10
   21
   10
 
Other, net (25)   (11)   (42) 
Income tax expense $1,141
   $1,063
   $(586) 



151



Total income tax expense for the years ended December 31 was allocated as follows:
(In millions)202220212020
Statements of earnings$403 $997 $(619)
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Unrealized foreign currency translation gains (losses) during
  period
547 15 (3)
Unrealized gains (losses) on fixed maturity securities:
Unrealized holding gains (losses) on fixed maturity
  securities during period
(2,752)(194)223 
Reclassification adjustment for (gains) losses
  on fixed maturity securities included in net earnings
0 (7)33 
Unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives during period1 
Pension liability adjustment during period35 30 (2)
Total income tax expense (benefit) related to items of
  other comprehensive income (loss)
(2,169)(155)251 
Total income taxes$(1,766)$842 $(368)
(In millions)2019 2018 2017
Statements of earnings $1,141
   $1,063
   $(586) 
Other comprehensive income (loss):           
Unrealized foreign currency translation gains (losses) during period 27
   10
   52
 
Unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities:           
Unrealized holding gains (losses) on investment
securities during period
 1,532
   (787)   575
 
Reclassification adjustment for realized (gains) losses
on investment securities included in net earnings
 5
   (12)   1
 
Unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives during period (3)   0
   0
 
Pension liability adjustment during period (18)   (8)   3
 
Total income tax expense (benefit) related to items of
other comprehensive income (loss)
 1,543
   (797)   631
 
Total income taxes $2,684
   $266
   $45
 



158

The income tax effects of the temporary differences that gave rise to deferred income tax assets and liabilities as of December 31 were as follows:
(In millions)2019 2018(In millions)20222021
Deferred income tax liabilities:     Deferred income tax liabilities:
Deferred policy acquisition costs $3,492
 $3,404
 Deferred policy acquisition costs$2,803 $3,262 
Unrealized gains and other basis differences on investments 4,485
 1,307
 Unrealized gains and other basis differences on investments0 5,313 
Foreign currency gain on Aflac JapanForeign currency gain on Aflac Japan147 
Premiums receivable 152
 149
 Premiums receivable59 66 
Policy benefit reserves 3,442
 3,828
 Policy benefit reserves3,173 3,578 
Total deferred income tax liabilities 11,571
 8,688
 Total deferred income tax liabilities6,182 12,219 
Deferred income tax assets:     Deferred income tax assets:
Unfunded retirement benefits 8
 8
 Unfunded retirement benefits7 
Other accrued expenses 36
 40
 Other accrued expenses27 38 
Policy and contract claims 781
 775
 Policy and contract claims722 794 
Foreign currency loss on Aflac Japan 16
 38
 Foreign currency loss on Aflac Japan0 91 
Deferred compensation 162
 163
 Deferred compensation65 104 
Capital loss carryforwards 34
 5
 
Depreciation 164
 119
 Depreciation248 230 
Anticipatory foreign tax credit 5,487
 4,040
 Anticipatory foreign tax credit3,069 5,883 
Deferred foreign tax credit 605
 591
 Deferred foreign tax credit822 701 
Other basis differences in investmentsOther basis differences in investments101 
Other 204
  150
 Other147 163 
Total deferred income tax assets before valuation allowance 7,497
 5,929
 
Valuation allowance (1,340) (738) 
Total deferred income tax assets after valuation allowance 6,157
 5,191
 
Total deferred income tax assetsTotal deferred income tax assets5,208 8,011 
Net deferred income tax liability 5,414
 3,497
 Net deferred income tax liability974 4,208 
Current income tax (asset) liability (44) 523
 Current income tax (asset) liability322 131 
Total income tax liability $5,370
 $4,020
 Total income tax liability$1,296 $4,339 

The application of U.S. GAAP requires the Company to evaluate the recoverability of deferred tax assets and establish a valuation allowance if necessary to reduce the deferred tax asset to an amount that is more likely than not expected to be realized. The Company has determined a $1,022 millionno valuation allowance against its anticipatory foreign tax creditcredits is necessary. The anticipatory foreign tax credit represents the foreign tax credit the Company will generate from the reversal of Japan deferred tax liabilities in the future. The increase inrelease of the valuation allowance on the anticipatory foreign tax credit is due to an increase Japan's local country deferredthe regulations addressing the allocation of insurance expenses in the calculation of the foreign tax inventory relative to the deferred tax inventory for Japan's U.S. tax obligation.credit released September 29, 2020. The Company has also determined a $318 millionno valuation allowance against its deferred foreign tax credits is necessary. Deferred foreign tax credits are foreign tax credits generated in the current tax year by the Japanese life company, but are unable to be utilized until 20202022 due to Japan's current tax year not closing until March 31, 2020.2022. The release of the valuation

152



allowance on the deferred foreign tax credit has increasedis also due to the utilization of prior year credits as well as the recognition of the current year deferred foreign tax credit.credit regulations released September 29, 2020. Based upon a review of the Company's anticipated future taxable income, and including all other available evidence, both positive and negative, the Company's management has concluded that, notwithstanding the items noted above, it is more likely than not that all other deferred tax assets will be realized.

Under U.S. income tax rules, only 35% of non-life operating losses can be offset against life insurance taxable income each year.year. For current U.S. income tax purposes, as of December 31, 2019,2022, there were non-life operating loss carryforwards of $99$18 million available to offset against future taxable income, all of which $31 million expires in 2039, and $68 million doesdo not expire. The Company has no capital loss carryforwards available to offset capital gains. The Company has foreign tax credit carryforwards of $161$65 million available to offset capital gains,against future excess foreign taxes paid, $20 million of which $65expire in 2030, $20 million expiresof which expire in 20232031 and $96$25 million expiresof which expire in 2024.2032.

The Company files federal income tax returns in the U.S. and Japan as well as state or prefecture income tax returns in various jurisdictions in the two countries. The Company isCompany's amended 2017-2019 federal income tax returns are currently under audit by the IRS for the 2013-2016 amended federal income tax returns.Internal Revenue Service. There are currently no other open Federal, State, or local U.S. income tax audits. U.S. federal income tax returns for years before 2016 are no longer subject to examination. In Japan, the corporate income tax returns for fiscal years ending March 31, 2020, 2021 and 2022 are currently under audit. Japan corporate income tax returns for years before 2016 are no longer subject to examination. Management believes it has established adequate tax liabilities and final resolution of all open audits is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.


159


A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows for the years ended December 31:
(In millions)2022 2021 
Balance, beginning of year$5 $19 
Additions for tax positions of prior years0     
Reductions for tax positions of prior years0   (15)
Balance, end of year$5 $
(In millions) 2019  2018 
Balance, beginning of year $15

 $14

Additions for tax positions of prior years 2
   1
  
Balance, end of year $17

 $15



Included in the balance of the liability for unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2019,2022 and 2021, are $15 million ofno tax positions for which the ultimate deductibility is highly certain, but for which there is uncertainty about the timing of such deductibility, compared with $14 million at December 31, 2018.deductibility. Because of the impact of deferred tax accounting, other than interest and penalties, the disallowance of the shorter deductibility period would not affect the annual effective tax rate, but would accelerate the payment of cash to the taxing authority to an earlier period. The Company has accrued approximately $2$5 million as of December 31, 2019,2022, for permanent uncertainties, which if reversed would not have a material effect on the annual effective rate.

The Company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. The Company recognized an immaterial amount of interest and penalties in 2022, compared with approximately $1 million in interestboth 2021 and penalties in 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.2020. The Company has accrued approximately $2 millionan immaterial amount for the payment of interest and penalties as of December 31, 2019, compared with $2 million at December 31, 2018.2022 and 2021, respectively.

As of December 31, 2019,2022, there were no material uncertain tax positions for which the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly increase or decrease within the next 12 months.

11.SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
11.    SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY

The following table is a reconciliation of the number of shares of the Company's common stock for the years ended December 31.

(In thousands of shares)202220212020
Common stock - issued:
Balance, beginning of period1,352,7391,351,0181,349,309
Exercise of stock options and issuance of restricted shares1,3401,7211,709
Balance, end of period1,354,0791,352,7391,351,018
Treasury stock:
Balance, beginning of period700,607658,564622,516
Purchases of treasury stock:
Share repurchase program39,18743,32737,899
Other370437542
Dispositions of treasury stock:
Shares issued to AFL Stock Plan(1,009)(1,216)(2,021)
Exercise of stock options(117)(275)(121)
Other(215)(230)(251)
Balance, end of period738,823700,607658,564
Shares outstanding, end of period615,256652,132692,454


153



(In thousands of shares)2019 2018 2017
Common stock - issued:     
Balance, beginning of period1,347,540 1,345,762 1,342,498
Exercise of stock options and issuance of restricted shares1,769 1,778 3,264
Balance, end of period1,349,309 1,347,540 1,345,762
Treasury stock:     
Balance, beginning of period592,254 564,852 530,877
Purchases of treasury stock:     
Share repurchase program31,994 28,949 35,510
Other592 392 1,018
Dispositions of treasury stock:     
Shares issued to AFL Stock Plan(1,610) (1,306) (1,782)
Exercise of stock options(418) (519) (734)
Other(296) (114) (37)
Balance, end of period622,516 592,254 564,852
Shares outstanding, end of period726,793 755,286 780,910

Outstanding share-based awards are excluded from the calculation of weighted-average shares used in the computation of basic EPS. The following table presents the approximate number of share-based awards to purchase shares, on a weighted-average basis, that were considered to be anti-dilutive and were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per shareEPS at December 31:
(In thousands)202220212020
Anti-dilutive share-based awards118 687 
(In thousands)2019 2018 2017
Anti-dilutive share-based awards 6
   44
   510
 



160

The weighted-average shares used in calculating earnings per shareEPS for the years ended December 31 were as follows: 
(In thousands of shares)202220212020
Weighted-average outstanding shares used for calculating basic EPS634,816 673,617 713,702 
Dilutive effect of share-based awards2,839 3,112 2,490 
Weighted-average outstanding shares used for calculating diluted EPS637,655 676,729 716,192 
(In thousands of shares)2019 2018 2017
Weighted-average outstanding shares used for calculating basic EPS742,414
 769,588
 792,042
Dilutive effect of share-based awards4,016
 5,062
 5,819
Weighted-average outstanding shares used for calculating diluted EPS746,430
 774,650
 797,861


Share Repurchase Program: During 2019,2022, the Company repurchased 32.039.2 million shares of its common stock in the open market for $1.6$2.4 billion. The Company repurchased 28.943.3 million shares for $1.3$2.3 billion in 20182021 and 35.537.9 million shares for $1.4$1.5 billion in 2017.2020. In November 2022, the Company's board of directors authorized the purchase of an additional 100 million shares of its common stock. As of December 31, 2019,2022, a remaining balance of 37.1116.6 million shares of the Company's common stock was available for purchase under share repurchase authorizations by its board of directors.

In August 2022, the IRA was signed into U.S. law. Effective January 1, 2023, the law imposes a 1% excise tax on the Company's repurchase of its common stock.

Voting Rights: In accordance with the Parent Company's articles of incorporation, shares of common stock are generally entitled to 1one vote per share until they have been held by the same beneficial owner for a continuous period of 48 months, at which time they become entitled to 10 votes per share.
Reclassifications from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
The tables below are reconciliations of accumulated other comprehensive income by component for the years ended December 31.


154



Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
2019
(In millions)Unrealized Foreign
Currency Translation
Gains (Losses)
 Unrealized
Gains (Losses)
on Investment Securities
 Unrealized
Gains (Losses)
on Derivatives
 Pension
Liability
Adjustment
 Total
Balance, beginning of period $(1,847)   $4,234
   $(24)   $(212)   $2,151
 
Other comprehensive
income (loss) before
reclassification
 224
   4,327
   (9)   (76)   4,466
 
Amounts reclassified from
accumulated other
comprehensive income
(loss)
 0
   (13)   0
   11
   (2) 
Net current-period other
comprehensive
income (loss)
 224
   4,314
   (9)   (65)   4,464
 
Balance, end of period $(1,623)   $8,548
   $(33)   $(277)   $6,615
 
All amounts in the table above are net of tax.
2018
(In millions)Unrealized Foreign
Currency Translation
Gains (Losses)
 Unrealized
Gains (Losses)
on Investment Securities
 Unrealized
Gains (Losses)
on Derivatives
 Pension Liability Adjustment Total
Balance, beginning of period $(1,750)   $5,964
   $(23)   $(163)   $4,028
 
Cumulative effect of change
in accounting principle -
financial instruments
 0
   (148)   0
   0
   (148) 
Cumulative effect of change
in accounting principle -
tax effects from tax reform
 (325)   734
   (3)   (32)   374
 
Other comprehensive
income (loss) before
reclassification
 228
   (2,350)   2
   (30)   (2,150) 
Amounts reclassified from
accumulated other
comprehensive income
(loss)
 0
   34
   0
   13
   47
 
Net current-period other
comprehensive
income (loss)
 228
   (2,316)   2
   (17)   (2,103) 
Balance, end of period $(1,847)   $4,234
   $(24)   $(212)   $2,151
 
All amounts in the table above are net of tax.


155



2017
(In millions)Unrealized Foreign
Currency Translation
Gains (Losses)
 Unrealized
Gains (Losses)
on Investment Securities
 Unrealized
Gains (Losses)
on Derivatives
 Pension Liability Adjustment Total
Balance, beginning of period $(1,983)   $4,805
   $(24)   $(168)   $2,630
 
Other comprehensive
income (loss) before
reclassification
 233
   1,158
   1
   (6)   1,386
 
Amounts reclassified from
accumulated other
comprehensive income
(loss)
 0
   1
   0
   11
   12
 
Net current-period other
comprehensive
income (loss)
 233
   1,159
   1
   5
   1,398
 
Balance, end of period $(1,750)   $5,964
   $(23)   $(163)   $4,028
 
2022
(In millions)Unrealized Foreign
Currency Translation
Gains (Losses)
Unrealized
Gains (Losses)
on Fixed Maturity Securities
Unrealized
Gains (Losses)
on Derivatives
Pension
Liability
Adjustment
Total
Balance at December 31, 2021$(2,013)$9,602 $(30)$(166)$7,393 
Other comprehensive
   income (loss) before
   reclassification
(1,627)(9,946)(1)111 (11,463)
Amounts reclassified from
   accumulated other
   comprehensive income
  (loss)
0 (358)4 19 (335)
Net current-period other
   comprehensive
   income (loss)
(1,627)(10,304)3 130 (11,798)
Balance at December 31, 2022$(3,640)$(702)$(27)$(36)$(4,405)
All amounts in the table above are net of tax.
For


161

2021
(In millions)Unrealized Foreign
Currency Translation
Gains (Losses)
Unrealized
Gains (Losses)
on Fixed Maturity Securities
Unrealized
Gains (Losses)
on Derivatives
Pension Liability AdjustmentTotal
Balance at December 31, 2020$(1,109)$10,361 $(34)$(284)$8,934 
Other comprehensive
   income (loss) before
   reclassification
(904)(735)(1)90 (1,550)
Amounts reclassified from
   accumulated other
   comprehensive income
  (loss)
(24)28 
Net current-period other
   comprehensive
   income (loss)
(904)(759)118 (1,541)
Balance at December 31, 2021$(2,013)$9,602 $(30)$(166)$7,393 
All amounts in the year ended December 31, 2018, see Note 1 for discussiontable above are net of tax.
2020
(In millions)Unrealized Foreign
Currency Translation
Gains (Losses)
Unrealized
Gains (Losses)
on Fixed Maturity Securities
Unrealized
Gains (Losses)
on Derivatives
Pension Liability AdjustmentTotal
Balance at December 31, 2019$(1,623)$8,548 $(33)$(277)$6,615 
Cumulative effect of change
   in accounting principle -
   ASU 2019-04
848 848 
Balance at January 1, 2020$(1,623)$9,396 $(33)$(277)$7,463 
Other comprehensive
   income (loss) before
   reclassification
514 839 (1)(30)1,322 
Amounts reclassified from
   accumulated other
   comprehensive income
  (loss)
126 23 149 
Net current-period other
   comprehensive
   income (loss)
514 965 (1)(7)1,471 
Balance at December 31, 2020$(1,109)$10,361 $(34)$(284)$8,934 
All amounts in the amounts reclassified between AOCI and retained earnings upon the adoptiontable above are net of new accounting pronouncements.

tax.
The tables below summarize the amounts reclassified from each component of accumulated other comprehensive income based on sourceinto net earnings for the years ended December 31.



162

Reclassifications Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
(In millions)2019 
Details about Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income ComponentsAmount Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive IncomeAffected Line Item in the
Statements of Earnings
Unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale
securities
 $(13) Other-than-temporary impairment
losses realized
  31
 Other gains (losses)
  18
 Total before tax
  (5) 
Tax (expense) or benefit(1)
  $13
 Net of tax
Amortization of defined benefit pension items:    
       Actuarial gains (losses) $(15) 
Acquisition and operating expenses(2)
Prior service (cost) credit 0
 
Acquisition and operating expenses(2)
  4
 
Tax (expense) or benefit(1)
  $(11) Net of tax
Total reclassifications for the period $2
 Net of tax

(In millions)2022
Details about Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income ComponentsAmount Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive IncomeAffected Line Item in the
Statements of Earnings
Unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale
   securities
$453Net investment gains (losses)
(95)
Tax (expense) or benefit(1)
$358Net of tax
Unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives$(4)Net investment gains (losses)
(1)Net investment income
(5)Total before tax
1
Tax (expense) or benefit(1)
$(4)Net of tax
Amortization of defined benefit pension items:
       Actuarial gains (losses)$(24)
Acquisition and operating expenses(2)
Prior service (cost) credit0
Acquisition and operating expenses(2)
5
Tax (expense) or benefit(1)
$(19)Net of tax
Total reclassifications for the period$335Net of tax
(1) Based on 26% blended21% tax rate
(2) These accumulated other comprehensive income components are included in the computation of net periodic pension cost (see
Note 14 for additional details).

156



(In millions)2018 
Details about Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income ComponentsAmount Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive IncomeAffected Line Item in the
Statements of Earnings
Unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale
securities
 $(63) Other-than-temporary impairment
losses realized
  17
 Other gains (losses)
  (46) Total before tax
  12
 
Tax (expense) or benefit(1)
  $(34) Net of tax
Amortization of defined benefit pension items:    
       Actuarial gains (losses) $(18) 
Acquisition and operating expenses(2)
Prior service (cost) credit 0
 
Acquisition and operating expenses(2)
  5
 
Tax (expense) or benefit(1)
  $(13) Net of tax
Total reclassifications for the period $(47) Net of tax
(1) Based on 27% blended tax rate
(2) These accumulated other comprehensive income components are included in the computation of net periodic pension cost (see Note 14 for additional details).
(In millions)2017 
Details about Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income ComponentsAmount Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive IncomeAffected Line Item in the
Statements of Earnings
Unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale
securities
 $(29) Other-than-temporary impairment
losses realized
  27
 Other gains (losses)
  (2) Total before tax
  1
 
Tax (expense) or benefit(1)
  $(1) Net of tax
Amortization of defined benefit pension items:    
       Actuarial gains (losses) $(17) 
Acquisition and operating expenses(2)
       Prior service (cost) credit 0
 
Acquisition and operating expenses(2)
  6
 
Tax (expense) or benefit(1)
  $(11) Net of tax
Total reclassifications for the period $(12) Net of tax
(In millions)2021
Details about Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income ComponentsAmount Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive IncomeAffected Line Item in the
Statements of Earnings
Unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale
   securities
$31 Net investment gains (losses)
(7)
Tax (expense) or benefit(1)
$24 Net of tax
Unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives$(5)Net investment gains (losses)
(1)Net investment income
(6)Total before tax
Tax (expense) or benefit(1)
$(5)Net of tax
Amortization of defined benefit pension items:
       Actuarial gains (losses)$(35)
Acquisition and operating expenses(2)
Prior service (cost) credit
Acquisition and operating expenses(2)
Tax (expense) or benefit(1)
$(28)Net of tax
Total reclassifications for the period$(9)Net of tax
(1) Based on 35%21% tax rate
(2) These accumulated other comprehensive income components are included in the computation of net periodic pension cost (see Note 14 for additional details).



163

(In millions)2020
Details about Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income ComponentsAmount Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive IncomeAffected Line Item in the
Statements of Earnings
Unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale
   securities
$(159)Net investment gains (losses)
33 
Tax (expense) or benefit(1)
$(126)Net of tax
Amortization of defined benefit pension items:
       Actuarial gains (losses)$(32)
Acquisition and operating expenses(2)
       Prior service (cost) credit
Acquisition and operating expenses(2)
Tax (expense) or benefit(1)
$(23)Net of tax
Total reclassifications for the period$(149)Net of tax
(1) Based on 21% tax rate
(2) These accumulated other comprehensive income components are included in the computation of net periodic pension cost (see Note 14 for additional details).

12.     SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION
As of December 31, 2019,2022, the Company has outstanding share-based awards under the Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan (As Amended and Restated February 14, 2017), as further amended on August 9, 2022 (the Plan). Share-based awards are designed to reward employees for their long-term contributions to the Company and provide incentives for them to remain with the Company. The number and frequency of share-based awards are based on competitive practices, operating results of the Company, government regulations, and other factors.
The Plan as amended on February 14, 2017, allows for a maximum number of shares issuable over its term of 75 million shares including 38 million shares that may be awarded in respect of awards other than options or stock appreciation rights. If any awards granted under the Plan are forfeited or are terminated before being exercised or settled for any reason other than tax forfeiture, then the shares underlying the awards will again be available under the Plan.

The Plan allows awards to Company employees for incentive stock options (ISOs), non-qualifying stock options (NQSOs), restricted stock, restricted stock units, and stock appreciation rights. Non-employee directors are eligible for grants of NQSOs,

157



restricted stock, and stock appreciation rights. As of December 31, 2019,2022, approximately 39.335.8 million shares were available for future grants under this plan. The ISOs and NQSOs have a term of 10 years, and the share-based awards generally vest upon time-based conditions or time and performance-based conditions. Time-based vesting generally occurs after three years. Performance-based vesting conditions generally include the attainment of goals related to Company financial performance. As of December 31, 2019,2022, the only performance-based awards issued and outstanding were restricted stock awards and units.

Stock options and stock appreciation rights granted under the amended Plan have an exercise price of at least the fair market value of the underlying stock on the grant date and have an expiration date no later than 10 years from the grant date. Time-based restricted stock awards, restricted stock units and stock options granted after January 1, 2017 generally vest on a ratable basis over three years, and awards granted prior to the amendment vest on a three-year cliff basis.basis over three years. The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors has the discretion to determine vesting schedules.

Share-based awards granted to U.S.-based grantees are settled with authorized but unissued Company stock, while those issued to Japan-based grantees are settled with treasury shares.
Summary of Share-Based Compensation Expense
Share-based compensation expense consists primarily of expenses for stock options, restricted stock awards (including performance based restricted stock awards), and restricted stock units granted to employees.



164

The following table presents the impact of the expense recognized in connection with share-based awards for the periods ended December 31.
(In millions, except for per-share amounts)202220212020
Impact on earnings from continuing operations$69 $65 $61 
Impact on earnings before income taxes69 65 61 
Impact on net earnings55 51 48 
Impact on net earnings per share:
Basic$.09 $.08 $.07 
Diluted.09 .08 .07 
(In millions, except for per-share amounts)2019 2018 2017
Impact on earnings from continuing operations $59
   $57
   $51
 
Impact on earnings before income taxes 59
   57
   51
 
Impact on net earnings 46
   45
   35
 
Impact on net earnings per share:           
Basic $.06
   $.06
   $.05
 
Diluted .06
   .06
   .05
 


Stock Options

The following table summarizes stock option activity under the employee stock option plan.
(In thousands of shares)Stock
Option
Shares
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price
Per Share
Outstanding at December 31, 20193,706 $29.65 
Granted in 202059 35.75 
Canceled in 2020(82)26.31 
Exercised in 2020(638)27.82 
Outstanding at December 31, 20203,045 30.25 
Granted in 20210.00 
Canceled in 2021(4)16.93 
Exercised in 2021(896)28.45 
Outstanding at December 31, 20212,145 31.02 
Granted in 20220 0.00 
Canceled in 2022(8)32.43 
Exercised in 2022(560)28.11 
Outstanding at December 31, 20221,577 $32.05 
(In thousands of shares)Stock
Option
Shares
 Weighted-Average
Exercise Price
Per Share
Outstanding at December 31, 2016 12,680
   $26.28
 
Granted in 2017 626
   35.80
 
Canceled in 2017 (236)   24.95
 
Exercised in 2017 (5,766)   30.11
 
Outstanding at December 31, 2017 7,304
   28.03
 
Granted in 2018 67
   44.59
 
Canceled in 2018 (167)   32.11
 
Exercised in 2018 (1,874)   26.78
 
Outstanding at December 31, 2018 5,330
   28.54
 
Granted in 2019 0
   0.00
 
Canceled in 2019 (40)   27.82
 
Exercised in 2019 (1,584)   25.97
 
Outstanding at December 31, 2019 3,706
   $29.65
 


(In thousands of shares)202220212020
Shares exercisable, end of year1,577 2,145 2,986 

158



(In thousands of shares)2019 2018 2017
Shares exercisable, end of year 3,553
   3,917
   4,208
 


The Company estimates the fair value of each stock option granted using the Black-Scholes-Merton multiple option approach. Expected volatility is based on historical periods generally commensurate with the estimated terms of the options. The Company uses historical data to estimate option exercise and termination patterns within the model. Separate groups of employees that have similar historical exercise patterns are stratified and considered separately for valuation purposes. The expected term of options granted is derived from the output of the Company's option model and represents the weighted-average period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding. The Company bases the risk-free interest rate on the Treasury note rate with a term comparable to that of the estimated term of the options. There were no options granted in 2019.2022 or 2021. The weighted-average fair value of options at their grant date was $8.81 for 2018 compared with $7.64$6.33 in 2017.2020. The following table presents the assumptions used in valuing options granted, if applicable, during the years ended December 31.
202220212020
Expected term (years)7.87.96.0
Expected volatility25.8 %25.6 %24.4 %
Annual forfeiture rate4.0 3.8 3.9 
Risk-free interest rate1.6 1.0 2.0 
Dividend yield2.7 3.0 3.3 
 2019 2018 2017
Expected term (years) 7.0   7.0   5.9 
Expected volatility 18.0%  22.0%  26.0%
Annual forfeiture rate 3.9   3.6   3.4 
Risk-free interest rate 2.9   2.5   2.5 
Dividend yield 2.2   2.4   2.5 



165

The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2019.2022.
(In thousands of shares)Options OutstandingOptions Exercisable
Range of
Exercise Prices
Per Share
Stock Option
Shares
Outstanding
Wgtd.-Avg.
Remaining
Contractual
Life (Yrs.)
Wgtd.-Avg.
Exercise
Price
Per Share
Stock Option
Shares
Exercisable
Wgtd.-Avg.
Exercise
Price
Per Share
$0.00 -$24.75 88 0.1$24.75 88 $24.75 
24.75 -28.97 298 3.028.94 298 28.94 
28.97 -31.21 564 1.830.70 564 30.70 
31.21 -36.21 478 3.734.25 478 34.25 
36.21 -44.59 149 4.840.57 149 40.57 
$0.00 -$44.59 1,577 2.8$32.05 1,577 $32.05 
(In thousands of shares)  Options Outstanding Options Exercisable
 Range of
Exercise Prices
Per Share
  Stock Option
Shares
Outstanding
 Wgtd.-Avg.
Remaining
Contractual
Life (Yrs.)
 Wgtd.-Avg.
Exercise
Price
Per Share
 Stock Option
Shares
Exercisable
 Wgtd.-Avg.
Exercise
Price
Per Share
 $16.92
-$24.75
   872
   2.1   $23.58
   872
   $23.58
 
 24.79
-28.97
   919
   3.8   28.49
   919
   28.49
 
 29.04
-31.21
   988
   4.7   30.77
   988
   30.77
 
 31.22
-36.21
   778
   6.5   34.31
   626
   34.02
 
 37.22
-44.59
   149
   7.8   40.57
   148
   40.59
 
 $16.92
-$44.59
   3,706
   4.4   $29.65
   3,553
   $29.40
 


The aggregate intrinsic value in the following table represents the total pretax intrinsic value, and is based on the difference between the exercise price of the stock options and the quoted closing common stock price of $52.90$71.94 as of December 31, 2019,2022, for those awards that have an exercise price currently below the closing price. As of December 31, 2019,2022, the aggregate intrinsic value of stock options outstanding was $86$63 million, with a weighted-average remaining term of 4.42.8 years. The total number of in-the-money stock options exercisable as of December 31, 2019,2022, was 3.6 million.1.6 million shares. The aggregate intrinsic value of stock options exercisable at that same date was $84$63 million, with a weighted-average remaining term of 4.22.8 years.

The following table summarizes stock option activity during the years ended December 31.
(In millions)202220212020
Total intrinsic value of options exercised$20 $21 $11 
Cash received from options exercised16 26 18 
Tax benefit realized as a result of options exercised and
  restricted stock releases
18 17 18 
(In millions)2019 2018 2017
Total intrinsic value of options exercised $38
   $34
   $87
 
Cash received from options exercised 40
   48
   58
 
Tax benefit realized as a result of options exercised and
restricted stock releases
 34
   25
   74
 


Performance-Based Restricted Stock Awards and Units

Under the Plan, the Company grants selected executive officers performance-based restricted stock awards (PBRS) each February whose vesting is contingent upon meeting various performance goals. PBRS are generally granted at-the-money and contingently cliff vest over a period of three years, generally subject to continued employment. In February 2019,2022, the Company granted 399390 thousand performance-based stock awards, which are contingent on the achievement of the Company's financial performance metrics and its market-based conditions. On the date of grant, the Company estimated

159




the fair value of restricted stock awards with market-based conditions using a Monte Carlo simulation model. The model discounts the value of the stock at the assumed vesting date based on a risk-free interest rate. Based on estimates of actual performance versus the vesting thresholds, the calculated fair value percentage pay-out estimate will be updated each quarter. Actual performance, including modification for relative total shareholder return, may result in the ultimate award of 0% to 200% percent of the initial number of PBRS issued, with the potential for no award if company performance goals are not achieved during the three-year period. PBRS subject to accelerated vesting at the date of retirement eligibility is recognized over the implicit service period.

The Company also granted selected executive officers performance-based restricted stock units (PSUs) throughout the year whose vesting is contingent upon meeting various performance goals. PSUs are generally granted at-the-money and contingently cliff vest over a period of three years, generally subject to continued employment. In November 2019,2022, the Company granted 46123 thousand performance-based stock units, which are contingent on the achievement of certain Company determined metrics. Based on estimates of actual performance versus the vesting thresholds, the calculated fair value percentage pay-out estimate will be updated each quarter. Actual performance may result in the ultimate award of 0% to 200% percent of the initial number of PSUs issued, with the potential for no award if the Company determined metrics are not achieved during the three-yearthree-year period. PSUs subject to accelerated vesting at the date of retirement eligibility is recognized over the implicit service period.

The Company uses third-party analyses to assist in developing the assumptions used in, as well as calibrating, a Monte Carlo simulation model. The Company is responsible for determining the assumptions used in estimating the fair value of its share-based payment awards.


166


Key assumptions used to value PBRS granted during 20192022 follows:
(In millions)20192022
Expected volatility (based on Aflac Inc. and peer group historical daily stock price)15.8237.1%%
Expected life from grant date (years)2.9
Risk-free interest rate (based on U.S. Treasury yields at the date of grant)2.511.8%%

Restricted Stock Awards and Units
The value of restricted stock awards and restricted stock units is based on the fair market value of the Company's common stock at the date of grant. The following table summarizes restricted stock activity during the years ended December 31.
(In thousands of shares)SharesWeighted-Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value
Per  Share
Restricted stock at December 31, 2019 (1)
2,715 $43.74 
Granted in 20201,544 45.88 
Canceled in 2020(119)49.27 
Vested in 2020(1,560)35.23 
Restricted stock at December 31, 20202,580 48.57 
Granted in 20211,496 47.87 
Canceled in 2021(148)49.00 
Vested in 2021(1,371)45.80 
Restricted stock at December 31, 20212,557 49.38 
Granted in 20221,119 66.72 
Canceled in 2022(96)54.59 
Vested in 2022(1,166)49.64 
Restricted stock at December 31, 20222,414 $56.21 
(1) This balance has been adjusted to include dividends
(In thousands of shares)Shares Weighted-Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value
Per  Share
Restricted stock at December 31, 2016 3,736
   $30.88
 
Granted in 2017 1,118
   36.48
 
Canceled in 2017 (202)   32.23
 
Vested in 2017 (1,018)   31.09
 
Restricted stock at December 31, 2017 3,634
   32.40
 
Granted in 2018 1,121
   44.27
 
Canceled in 2018 (105)   34.39
 
Vested in 2018 (1,243)   31.64
 
Restricted stock at December 31, 2018 3,407
   36.52
 
Granted in 2019 1,070
   49.68
 
Canceled in 2019 (39)   41.60
 
Vested in 2019 (1,865)   32.73
 
Restricted stock at December 31, 2019 2,573
   $44.66
 


As of December 31, 2019,2022, total compensation cost not yet recognized in the Company's financial statements related to restricted stock awards and restricted stock units was $60$33 million, of which $30$14 million (1.5(1.2 million shares) was related to restricted stock awards with a performance-based vesting condition. The Company expects to recognize these amounts over

160




a weighted-average period of approximately 1.11.7 years. There are no other contractual terms covering restricted stock awards once vested.

13.     STATUTORY ACCOUNTING AND DIVIDEND RESTRICTIONS
The Company's insurance subsidiaries are required to report their results of operations and financial position to insurance regulatory authorities on the basis of statutory accounting practices prescribed or permitted by such authorities. Statutory

Aflac Japan must report its results of operations and financial position to the Japanese Financial Services Agency (FSA) on a Japanese regulatory accounting basis as prescribed by the FSA. Japanese regulatory accounting practices primarily differ in many respects from U.S. GAAP by chargingGAAP. Under Japanese regulatory accounting practices, policy acquisition costs to expense as incurred, establishing futureare expensed immediately; policy benefit liabilities usingand claim reserving methods and assumptions are different; premiums are recognized on a cash basis; different actuarial assumptions as well as valuing investments and certain assets and accounting for deferred taxesconsolidation criteria apply to VIEs; reinsurance is recognized on a different basis.

basis; and investments can have a separate accounting classification and treatment referred to as policy reserve matching bonds (PRM). Capital and surplus of Aflac Japan, based on Japanese regulatory accounting practices, was $6.7 billion at December 31, 2022, compared with $9.8 billion at December 31, 2021.



167

Aflac, reportsCAIC and TOIC report statutory financial statements that are prepared on the basis of accounting practices prescribed or permitted by the Nebraska Department of Insurance (NDOI). The NDOI recognizes statutory accounting principles and practices prescribed or permitted by the state of Nebraska for determining and reporting the financial condition and results of operations of an insurance company, and for determining a company's solvency under Nebraska insurance law. 

Aflac New York reports statutory financial statements that are prepared on the basis of accounting practices prescribed or permitted by the New York State Department of Financial Services (NYSDFS). The NYSDFS recognizes statutory accounting principles and practices prescribed or permitted by the state of New York for determining and reporting the financial condition and results of operations of an insurance company, and for determining a company's solvency under New York insurance law.

Statutory Accounting Principles (SAP) as detailed by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners' (NAIC) Accounting Practices and Procedures Manual hashave been adopted by both the state of Nebraska and the state of New York as a component of those prescribed or permitted practices. Statutory accounting practices primarily differ from U.S. GAAP by charging policy acquisition costs to expense as incurred, establishing future policy benefit liabilities using different actuarial assumptions as well as valuing investments and certain assets and accounting for deferred taxes on a different basis. Additionally, the Director of the NDOI hasand the Superintendent of the NYSDFS each have the right to permit other specific practices which deviate from prescribed practices. Prior to the Japan branch conversion on April 1, 2018, Aflac, had been given explicit permission by the Director of the NDOI for two such permitted practices. On April 1, 2018, the Company entered into a series of transactions in order to complete the conversion of the Japan branch into a Japanese insurance corporation. As a result of the conversion, the permitted practices were no longer necessary, therefore they were canceled by the NDOI effective April 2, 2018.CAIC, TOIC and Aflac New York had no permitted practices as of December 31, 20192022, and 2018.2021.

Aflac'sThe table below represents statutory capital and surplus as determined by NAIC basis and Nebraska state basis was $2.1 billion and $2.6 billionbased on statutory accounting practices for the Company’s U.S. life insurance subsidiaries as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. 31.
(In millions)20222021
Aflac$3,097 $2,627 
CAIC360 244 
TOIC60 57 
Aflac New York339 360 

As of December 31, 2019, Aflac's2022, the capital and surplus significantlyfor each of the Company's U.S. life insurance subsidiaries exceeded the required company action level capital and surplus of $.4 billion. As determinedsurplus.

The table below represents net income (loss) based on a U.S. statutory accounting basis, Aflac's net income was $864 million in 2019, $1.3 billion in 2018 and $2.6 billion in 2017.practices for the Company’s U.S. life insurance subsidiaries as of December 31.

(In millions)202220212020
Aflac$1,134 $1,146 $872 
CAIC(69)(30)
TOIC(35)(27)(24)
Aflac New York67 83 75 
Aflac Japan must report its results of operations and financial position to the Japanese Financial Services Agency (FSA) on a Japanese regulatory accounting basis as prescribed by the FSA. Capital and surplus of Aflac Japan, based on Japanese regulatory accounting practices, was $7.8 billion at December 31, 2019, compared with $6.4 billion at December 31, 2018. Japanese regulatory accounting practices differ in many respects from U.S. GAAP. Under Japanese regulatory accounting practices, policy acquisition costs are expensed immediately; policy benefit and claim reserving methods and assumptions are different; premium income is recognized on a cash basis; different consolidation criteria apply to VIEs; reinsurance is recognized on a different basis; and investments can have a separate accounting classification and treatment referred to as policy reserve matching bonds (PRM).

The Parent Company depends on its subsidiaries for cash flow, primarily in the form of dividends and management fees. Consolidated retained earnings in the accompanying financial statements largely represent the undistributed earnings of the Company's insurance subsidiary.subsidiaries. Amounts available for dividends, management fees and other payments to the Parent Company by its insurance subsidiaries may fluctuate due to different accounting methods required by regulatory authorities. These payments are also subject to various regulatory restrictions and approvals related to safeguarding the interests of insurance policyholders. AflacThe Company's U.S. life insurance entities must maintain adequate RBCrisk-based capital (RBC) for U.S. regulatory authorities, and Aflac Japan must maintain adequate solvency margins for Japanese regulatory authorities.

The maximum amount of dividends that can be paid to the Parent Company by Aflac, CAIC and CAICTOIC without prior approval of Nebraska's director of insurance is the greater of the net income from operations, which excludes net realized investment gains, for the previous year determined under statutory accounting principles, or 10% of statutory capital and surplus as of the previous year-end. In 2022, Aflac declared dividends of $594 million. Dividends declared by Aflac during 20202023 in excess of $864 million$1.1 billion would require such approval. CAIC and TOIC did not declare dividends during 2022.


168

From time to time, Aflac New York pays dividends to Aflac, the parent company of Aflac New York. Aflac New York may not pay dividends to Aflac without the prior approval of the NYSDFS. Aflac New York declared dividends of $1.3 billion during 2019.$83 million in 2022, which were authorized by the NYSDFS.

After the Japan branch conversion as of April 1, 2018, Aflac Japan is required to meet certain financial criteria as governed by Japanese corporate law in order to provide dividends to the Parent Company. Under these criteria, dividend capacity at Aflac Japan is basically defined as retained earnings excluding capital reserves, which represent equity generated by capital profits that are statutorily required in Japan, less net after-tax unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities based on the previous fiscal year-end. Prior to April 1, 2018, a portion of Aflac Japan earnings, as determined on a Japanese regulatory accounting basis, could be remitted each year to Aflac U.S. after complying with solvency margin provisions and satisfying various conditions imposed by Japanese regulatory authorities for protecting policyholders. Profit remittances to the U.S. could fluctuate due to changes in the amounts of Japanese regulatory earnings. Among other items, factors affecting regulatory

161




earnings include Japanese regulatory accounting practices and fluctuations in currency translation of Aflac Japan's U.S. dollar-denominated investments and related investment income into yen. Profits remitted by Aflac Japan to the Parent Company after April 1, 2018, and to Aflac U.S., prior to April 1, 2018, were as follows for the years ended December 31:
  
In DollarsIn Yen
(In millions of dollars and billions of yen)202220212020202220212020
Profit remittances$2,412 $2,138 $1,215 ¥324.2 ¥236.7 ¥129.8 
  
In Dollars In Yen
(In millions of dollars and billions of yen)2019 2018 2017 2019 2018 2017
Profit remittances $2,070
   $808
   $1,150
   ¥225.2
   ¥89.7
   ¥129.3
 



169
162




14.     BENEFIT PLANS

Pension and Other Postretirement Plans
The Company has funded defined benefit plans in Japan and the U.S., however the U.S. plan was frozen to new participants effective October 1, 2013. The Company also maintains non-qualified, unfunded supplemental retirement plans that provide defined pension benefits in excess of limits imposed by federal tax law for certain Japanese, U.S. and former employees, however the U.S. plan was frozen to new participants effective January 1, 2015. U.S. employees who are not participants in the defined benefit plan receive a nonelective 401(k) employer contribution.

The Company provides certain health care benefits for eligible U.S. retired employees, their beneficiaries and covered dependents (other postretirement benefits). The health care plan is contributory and unfunded. Effective January 1, 2014, employees eligible for benefits included the following: (1) active employees whose age plus service, in years, equaled or exceeded 80 (rule of 80); (2) active employees who were age 55 or older and have met the 15 years of service requirement; (3) active employees who would meet the rule of 80 in the next five years; (4) active employees who were age 55 or older and who would meet the 15 years of service requirement within the next five years; and (5) current retirees. For certain employees and former employees, additional coverage is provided for all medical expenses for life.

Information with respect to the Company's benefit plans' assets and obligations as of December 31 was as follows:
Pension BenefitsOther
JapanU.S.Postretirement Benefits
(In millions)202220212022202120222021
Projected benefit obligation:
      Benefit obligation, beginning of year$432 $473 $1,186 $1,204 $36 $42 
      Service cost19 23 26 28 0 
      Interest cost5 34 32 1 
      Actuarial (gain) loss(61)(9)(374)(50)0 (2)
      Benefits and expenses paid(13)(15)(29)(28)(5)(5)
      Effect of foreign exchange
         rate changes
(55)(46)0 0 
               Benefit obligation, end of year327 432 843 1,186 32 36 
Plan assets:
      Fair value of plan assets,
         beginning of year
415 416 885 824 0 
      Actual return on plan assets(46)14 (205)81 0 
      Employer contributions34 44 8 5 
      Benefits and expenses paid(13)(15)(29)(28)(5)(5)
      Effect of foreign exchange
         rate changes
(55)(44)0 0 
               Fair value of plan assets,
                  end of year
335 415 659 885 0 
Funded status of the plans(1)
$8 $(17)$(184)$(301)$(32)$(36)
Amounts recognized in accumulated other
    comprehensive income:
      Net actuarial (gain) loss$35 $50 $10 $158 $8 $10 
      Prior service (credit) cost0 (2)(2)0 
               Total included in accumulated
                  other comprehensive income
$35 $50 $8 $156 $8 $10 
Accumulated benefit obligation$215 $346 $741 $1,010 N/AN/A
  Pension Benefits Other
  Japan U.S. Postretirement Benefits
(In millions) 20192018 20192018 20192018
Projected benefit obligation:                     
      Benefit obligation, beginning of year  $396
  $341
   $875
  $908
   $37
  $36
 
      Service cost  22
  19
   23
  27
   0
  0
 
      Interest cost  7
  7
   20
  31
   1
  1
 
      Actuarial (gain) loss  17
  35
   163
(3) 
 (69)   4
  4
 
      Benefits and expenses paid  (11)  (11)   (23)  (22)   (3)  (4) 
      Effect of foreign exchange
rate changes
  5
  5
   0
  0
   0
  0
 
               Benefit obligation, end of year  436
  396
   1,058
  875
   39
  37
 
                      
Plan assets:                     
      Fair value of plan assets,
beginning of year
  289
  270
   465
  448
   0
  0
 
      Actual return on plan assets  24
  (9)   98
  (30)   0
  0
 
      Employer contributions  38
  34
   104
  69
   3
  4
 
      Benefits and expenses paid  (11)  (11)   (23)  (22)   (3)  (4) 
      Effect of foreign exchange
rate changes
  4
  5
   0
  0
   0
  0
 
               Fair value of plan assets,
end of year
  344
  289
   644
  465
   0
  0
 
Funded status of the plans(1)
  $(92)  $(107)   $(414)  $(410)   $(39)  $(37) 
                      
Amounts recognized in accumulated other
comprehensive income:
                     
      Net actuarial (gain) loss  $92
  $95
   $259
  $174
   $12
  $9
 
      Prior service (credit) cost  (2)  (2)   (4)  (4)   0
  0
 
               Total included in accumulated
other comprehensive income
  $90
  $93
   $255
  $170
   $12
  $9
 
Accumulated benefit obligation  $390
  $356
   $886
  $746
     N/A
(2) 
 N/A
(2) 
(1) RecognizedUnderfunded amounts are recognized in other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets and overfunded amounts are recognized in other assets in the consolidated balance sheets
(2)
Not applicable
(3) Actuarial losses increased due to lower discount rates at the end of 2019. Also, additional funds were contributed to the U.S. funded defined benefit plan in 2019. The Company contributed $95 million in 2019 compared to $60 million in 2018.

170
163



Information for Pension Plans with an Accumulated Benefit Obligation in Excess of Plan Assets
  Pension Benefits
  Japan   U.S.
(In millions) 2019 2018   2019 2018 
Accumulated benefit obligation  $390
   $356
    $886
   $746
 
Fair value of plan assets  344
   289
    644
   465
 

Pension Benefits
JapanU.S.
(In millions)2022202120222021
Accumulated benefit obligation$215 $346 $741 $1,010 
Fair value of plan assets335 415 659 885 
Information for Pension Plans with a Projected Benefit Obligation in Excess of Plan Assets
 Pension BenefitsPension Benefits
 
Japan (1)
  
U.S.(2)
Japan (1)
U.S.(2)
(In millions) 2019 2018  2019 2018 (In millions)2022202120222021
Projected benefit obligation $436
 $396
 $1,058
 $875
 Projected benefit obligation$327 $432 $843 $1,186 
Fair value of plan assets 344
 289
   644
 465
 Fair value of plan assets335 415 659 885 
(1) The net amount of projected benefit obligation and plan assets for the overfunded Japan pension plan was $8 at December 31, 2022 and was classified as other assets on the statement of financial position. The net amount of projected benefit obligation and plan assets for the underfunded (including unfunded) Japan pension plan was $92 and $107$17 at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively,2021 and was classified as liabilities on the statement of financial position.
(2) The net amount of projected benefit obligation and plan assets for the underfunded (including unfunded) U.S. pension plan was $414$184 and $410$301 at December 31, 20192022 and 2018,2021, respectively, and was classified as liabilities on the statement of financial position.

Information for other postretirement benefit plans with an accumulated postretirement benefit obligation in excess of plan assets has been disclosed in the note on “Obligations and Funded Status” because all the other postretirement benefit plans are unfunded or underfunded.
 Pension Benefits Other
 Japan  U.S.  Postretirement Benefits
 2019 2018 2017  2019 2018 2017  2019 2018 2017 
Weighted-average actuarial assumptions:                               
Discount rate - net periodic benefit cost1.25% 1.25% 1.25%  4.25% 3.75% 4.25%  4.25% 3.75% 4.25% 
Discount rate - benefit obligations.75
 1.25
 1.25
  3.25
 4.25
 3.75
   3.25
 4.25
 3.75
  
Expected long-term return on plan assets2.00
 2.00
 2.00
  6.25
 6.50
 6.75
  N/A
(1) 
N/A
(1) 
N/A
(1) 
Rate of compensation increaseN/A
(1) 
N/A
(1) 
N/A
(1) 
 4.00
 4.00
 4.00
  N/A
(1) 
N/A
(1) 
N/A
(1) 
Health care cost trend ratesN/A
(1) 
N/A
(1) 
N/A
(1) 
 N/A
(1) 
N/A
N/A
(1) 
  7.50
(2) 
7.40
(2) 
5.40
(2) 
(1) Not applicable
Pension BenefitsOther
JapanU.S.Postretirement Benefits
202220212020202220212020202220212020
Weighted-average
  actuarial assumptions:
                    
Discount rate - net periodic
  benefit cost
.94 %.75 %.75 %2.94 %2.68 %3.25 %2.94 %2.68 %3.25 %
Discount rate - benefit
  obligations
1.95 .94 .75 5.28 2.94 2.68   5.28 2.94 2.68   
Expected long-term return
  on plan assets
2.00 2.00 2.00 5.50 5.75 6.00 N/AN/AN/A
Rate of compensation
  increase
N/AN/AN/A4.00 4.00 4.00 N/AN/AN/A
Health care cost trend ratesN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A6.50 (1)5.80 (1)6.30 (1)
(2)(1) For the years 2019, 20182022, 2021 and 2017,2020, the health care cost trend rates are expected to trend down to 3.8%3.7% in 5451 years,, 4.1% 3.7% in 6152 years, and 4.5%3.7% in 7753 years,, respectively.

The Company determines its discount rate assumption for its pension retirement obligations based on indices for AA corporate bonds with an average duration of approximately 20 years for the Japan pension plans and 17 years for the U.S. pension plans, and determination of the U.S. pension plans discount rate utilizes the 85-year extrapolated yield curve. In Japan, participant salary and future salary increases are not factors in determining pension benefit cost or the related pension benefit obligation.

The Company bases its assumption for the long-term rate of return on assets on historical trends (10-year or longer historical rates of return for the Japanese plan assets and 15-year historical rates of return for the U.S. plan assets), expected future market movement, as well as the portfolio mix of securities in the asset portfolio including, but not limited to, style, class and equity and fixed income allocations. In addition, the Company's consulting actuaries evaluate its assumptions for long-term rates of return under Actuarial Standards of Practice (ASOP). Under the ASOP, the actual portfolio type, mix and class is modeled to determine a best estimate of the long-term rate of return. The Company in turn use those results to further validate its own assumptions.

164

171


Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost
Pension and other postretirement benefit expenses are included in acquisition and operating expenses in the consolidated statements of earnings, which includes $8$14 million $25, $25 million and $35$30 million of other components of net periodic pension cost and postretirement costs (other than servicesservice costs) for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021 and 2017,2020, respectively. Total net periodic benefit cost includes the following components:
Pension BenefitsOther
JapanU.S.Postretirement Benefits
(In millions)202220212020202220212020202220212020
Service cost$19 $23 $24 $26 $28 $29 $0 $$
Interest cost5 34 32 34 1 
Expected return on plan assets(8)(8)(7)(42)(41)(35)0 
Amortization of net actuarial loss1 21 30 26 2 
Amortization of prior service cost0 (1)0 (2)0 
Net periodic (benefit) cost$17 $23 $25 $39 $49 $52 $3 $$
  Pension Benefits Other
   Japan  U.S. Postretirement Benefits
(In millions) 2019 2018 2017 2019 2018 2017 2019 2018 2017
Service cost  $22
   $19
   $20
   $23
   $27
   $24
   $0
   $0
   $0
 
Interest cost  7
   7
   6
   20
   31
   40
   1
   1
   1
 
Expected return on plan
assets
  (6)   (6)   (5)   (29)   (26)   (24)   0
   0
   0
 
Amortization of net actuarial
loss
  4
   1
   2
   10
   16
   14
   1
   1
   1
 
Net periodic (benefit) cost  $27
   $21
   $23
   $24
   $48
   $54
   $2
   $2
   $2
 


Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
The following table summarizes the amounts recognized in other comprehensive loss (income) for the years ended December 31:
Pension BenefitsOther
JapanU.S.Postretirement Benefits
(In millions)202220212020202220212020202220212020
Net actuarial loss (gain)$(14)$(22)$(14)$(127)$(90)$45 $0 $(2)$
Amortization of net
  actuarial loss
(1)(2)(4)(21)(30)(26)(2)(3)(2)
Amortization of prior
  service cost
0 0 0 
     Total$(15)$(23)$(17)$(148)$(120)$21 $(2)$(5)$
  Pension Benefits Other
  Japan U.S. Postretirement Benefits
(In millions) 2019 2018 2017 2019 2018 2017 2019 2018 2017
Net actuarial loss (gain)  $1
   $52
   $(21)   $95
   $(13)   $28
   $4
   $4
   $0
 
Amortization of net actuarial loss  (4)   (1)   (2)   (10)   (16)   (14)   (1)   (1)   (1) 
     Total  $(3)   $51
   $(23)   $85
   $(29)   $14
   $3
   $3
   $(1) 


NaNNo transition obligations arose during 2019.2022.

Benefit Payments
The following table provides expected benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate.
Pension BenefitsOther
(In millions)JapanU.S.Postretirement Benefits
2023$10 $33 $
202417 34 
202515 35 
202614 37 
202714 46 
2028-203279 246 
  Pension Benefits Other
(In millions) JapanU.S. Postretirement Benefits
2020  $13
  $25
   $3
 
2021  12
  27
   4
 
2022  17
  29
   4
 
2023  14
  30
   4
 
2024  16
  31
   4
 
2025-2029  84
  203
   16
 


Funding

The Company plans to make contributions of $35$32 million to the Japanese funded defined benefit plan in 2020.2023. The Company does not plan to make any contributions to the U.S. funded defined benefit plan in 2020.2023. The Company funded additional contributionsdid not make a contribution to the U.S. funded defined benefit plan in 2019.2022. The funding policy for the Company's non-qualified supplemental defined benefit pension plans and other postretirement benefits plan is to contribute the amount of the benefit payments made during the year.


165172



Plan Assets

The investment objective of the Company's Japanese and U.S. funded defined benefit plans is to preserve the purchasing power of the plan's assets and earn a reasonable inflation-adjusted rate of return over the long term. Furthermore, the Company seeks to accomplish these objectives in a manner that allows for the adequate funding of plan benefits and expenses. In order to achieve these objectives, the Company's goal is to maintain a conservative, well-diversified and balanced portfolio of high-quality equity, fixed-income and money market securities. As a part of its strategy, the Company has established strict policies covering quality, type and concentration of investment securities. For the Company's Japanese plan, these policies include limitations on investments in derivatives including futures, options and swaps, and low-liquidity investments such as real estate, venture capital investments, and privately issued securities. For the Company's U.S. plan, these policies prohibit investments in precious metals, limited partnerships, venture capital, and direct investments in real estate. The Company is also prohibited from trading on margin.

The plan fiduciaries for the Company's funded defined benefit plans have developed guidelines for asset allocations reflecting a percentage of total assets by asset class, which are reviewed on an annual basis. In 2022, the Company updated the asset allocation for the Aflac U.S. pension plan to better align assets and liabilities and preserve the current funded status of near full funding. Asset allocation targets as of December 31, 20192022 were as follows:
Japan
Pension
U.S.
Pension
Domestic equities%%
International equities17 
Fixed income securities69 100 
Other
     Total100 %100 %
  Japan Pension U.S. Pension
Domestic equities  5%   40% 
International equities  20
   20
 
Fixed income securities  66
   40
 
Other  9
   0
 
     Total  100%   100% 


The U.S. Pension Plan had $100 million in cash at December 31, 2019. The plan fiduciaries authorized investing a contribution made to the Plan in 2019 on a graduated basis over a period of time.

The following table presents the fair value of Aflac Japan's pension plan assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31. All of these assets are classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.
(In millions)2019 2018
Japan pension plan assets:       
     Equities:       
        Japanese equity securities $17
   $14
 
        International equity securities 67
   50
 
     Fixed income securities:       
        Japanese bonds 20
   34
 
        International bonds 207
   160
 
     Insurance contracts 33
   31
 
        Total $344
   $289
 
(In millions)20222021
Japan pension plan assets:
     Equities:
        Japanese equity securities$20 $21 
        International equity securities57 86 
     Fixed income securities:
        Japanese bonds20 22 
        International bonds210 252 
     Insurance contracts28 34 
        Total$335 $415 

The following table presents the fair value of Aflac U.S.'s pension plan assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31. All of these assets are classified as Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy.

(In millions)20222021
U.S. pension plan assets:
     Mutual funds:
        Large cap equity funds$0 $297 
        Mid cap equity funds0 25 
        International equity funds0 208 
        Fixed income bond funds641 346 
     Aflac Incorporated common stock0 
     Cash and cash equivalents18 
        Total$659 $885 
166


173

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data


(In millions)2019 2018
U.S. pension plan assets:       
     Mutual funds:       
        Large cap equity funds $179
   $120
 
        Mid cap equity funds 22
   17
 
        Real estate equity funds 16
   13
 
        International equity funds 112
   92
 
        Fixed income bond funds 209
   179
 
     Aflac Incorporated common stock 6
   5
 
     Cash and cash equivalents 100
   39
 
        Total $644
   $465
 


The fair values of the Company's pension plan investments categorized as Level 1, consisting of mutual funds and common stock, are based on quoted market prices for identical securities traded in active markets that are readily and regularly available to the Company. The fair values of the Company's pension plan investments classified as Level 2 are based on quoted prices for similar assets in markets that are not active, other inputs that are observable, such as interest rates, yield curves, volatilities, prepayment speeds, loss severities, credit risks, and default rates, or other market-corroborated inputs.

401(k) Plan

The Company sponsors a 401(k) plan in which it matches a portion of U.S. employees' contributions. The plan provides for salary reduction contributions by employees and, provides forin 2022, 2021, and 2020, provided matching contributions which, starting January 1, 2018,by the Company increased toof 100% of each employee's contributions which were not in excess of 4% of the employee's annual cash compensation as a result of tax reform.compensation. The Company also provides a nonelective contribution to the 401(k) plan of 2%4% of annual cash compensation for employees who opted out of the future benefits of the U.S. defined benefit plan and for new U.S. employees.

The 401(k) contributions by the Company, included in acquisition and operating expenses in the consolidated statements of earnings, were $18 million in both 20192022 and 2018 and $15$20 million in 2017.both 2021 and 2020. The plan trustee held approximately 2.62.2 million shares of the Company's common stock for plan participants at December 31, 2019.2022.

Stock Bonus Plan

Aflac U.S. maintains a stock bonus plan for eligible U.S. sales associates. Plan participants receive shares of Aflac Incorporated common stock based on their new annualized premium sales and their first-year persistency of substantially all new insurance policies. The cost of this plan, which was capitalized as deferred policy acquisition costs, amounted to $31$16 million in 2019, 20182022 and 2017.$15 million in 2021 and $24 million in 2020.

Voluntary Separation Program

In September 2020, the Company announced a voluntary separation program for certain U.S. employees. The program provides eligible employees with a severance package, including twelve months of salary, the employee's targeted bonus payout for 2020 and one year of Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (COBRA) or retiree medical, if eligible. Employees accepted into this program were notified in October 2020 and most transitions were completed by December 31, 2020, with a small number continuing into the first quarter of 2021. The Company recorded a one-time severance charge of $43 million in the fourth quarter of 2020 related to the program.

15.     COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES

The Company has 2two outsourcing agreements with a technology and consulting corporation. The first agreement provides mainframe computer operations, distributed mid-range server computer operations, and related support for Aflac Japan. It has a remaining term of threetwo years and an aggregate remaining cost of ¥26.7¥19.4 billion ($244146 million using the December 31, 2019,2022, exchange rate). The second agreement provides application maintenance and development services for Aflac Japan. It has a remaining term of fourtwo years and an aggregate remaining cost of ¥6.6¥2.2 billion ($6117 million using the December 31, 2019,2022, exchange rate).

The Company has an outsourcing agreement with a management consulting and technology services company to provide application maintenance and development services for its Japanese operation.Aflac Japan. The agreement has a remaining term of twofour years with an aggregate remaining cost of ¥6.9¥12.5 billion ($6394 million using the December 31, 2019,2022, exchange rate).

The Company has 2two outsourcing agreements with information technology and data services companies to provide application maintenance and development services for its Japanese operation.Aflac Japan. The first agreement has a remaining term of three years with an aggregate remaining cost of ¥5.5¥6.0 billion ($5045 million using the December 31, 2019,2022, exchange rate). The second agreement has a remaining term of three years with an aggregate remaining cost of ¥4.9¥7.6 billion ($4557 million using the December 31, 2019,2022, exchange rate).

The Company has an enterprise agreement with an information technology and data services company to license software for Aflac Japan. The agreement has a remaining term of one year with an aggregate remaining cost of ¥0.9 billion ($7 million using the December 31, 2022, exchange rate).
167


174

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data


The Company has an outsourcing agreement with an information technology and software company to provide application maintenance and development services for Aflac Japan. The agreement has a remaining term of three years with an aggregate remaining cost of ¥2.7 billion ($20 million using the December 31, 2022, exchange rate).

The Company is a defendant in various lawsuits considered to be in the normal course of business. Members of the Company's senior legal and financial management teams review litigation on a quarterly and annual basis. The final results of any litigation cannot be predicted with certainty. Although some of this litigation is pending in states where large punitive damages, bearing little relation to the actual damages sustained by plaintiffs, have been awarded in recent years, the Company believes the outcome of pending litigation will not have a material adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

See Note 3 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for details on certain investment commitments.

Guaranty Fund Assessments

The U.S. insurance industry has a policyholder protection system that is monitored and regulated by state insurance departments. These life and health insurance guaranty associations are state entities (in all 50 states as well as Puerto Rico and the District of Columbia) created to protect policyholders of an insolvent insurance company. All insurance companies (with limited exceptions) licensed to sell life or health insurance in a state must be members of that state’s guaranty association. Under state guaranty association laws, certain insurance companies can be assessed (up to prescribed limits) for certain obligations to the policyholders and claimants of impaired or insolvent insurance companies that write the same line or similar lines of business.

In 2009, the Pennsylvania Insurance Commissioner placed long-term care insurer Penn Treaty Network America Insurance Company and its subsidiary American Network Insurance Company (collectively referred to as Penn Treaty), neither of which is affiliated with Aflac, in rehabilitation and petitioned a state court for approval to liquidate Penn Treaty. A final order of liquidation was granted by a recognized judicial authority on March 1, 2017, and as a result, Penn Treaty is in the process of liquidation. The Company estimated and recognized the impact of its share of guaranty fund assessments resulting from the liquidation using a discounted rate of 4.25%. The Company recognized a discounted liability for the assessments of $62 million (undiscounted $94 million), offset by discounted premium tax credits of $48 million (undiscounted $74 million), for a net $14 million impact to net income in the quarter ended March 31, 2017. The Company paid a majority of these assessments by MarchDecember 31, 2019.2022. The Company used the cost estimate provided as of the liquidation date by the National Organization of Life and Health Guaranty Associations (NOLHGA) to calculate its estimated assessments and tax credits. Other guarantyGuaranty fund assessments for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018,2022, 2021, and 20172020 were immaterial.

16. UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA

In management's opinion, the following quarterly financial information fairly presents the results of operations for such periods and is prepared on a basis consistent with the Company's annual audited financial statements.

168




(In millions, except for per-share amounts)March 31,
2019
 June 30,
2019
 September 30,
2019
 December 31,
2019
Net premium income $4,691
   $4,681
   $4,736
   $4,671
 
Net investment income 878
   878
   936
   886
 
Realized investment gains (losses) 71
   (66)   (153)   12
 
Other income (loss) 17
   18
   17
   34
 
Total revenues 5,657
   5,511
   5,536
   5,603
 
Total benefits and expenses 4,415
   4,402
   4,500
   4,545
 
Earnings before income taxes 1,242
   1,109
   1,036
   1,058
 
Total income tax 314
   292
   259
   276
 
Net earnings $928
   $817
   $777
   $782
 
Net earnings per basic share $1.23
   $1.10
   $1.05
   $1.07
 
Net earnings per diluted share 1.23
   1.09
   1.04
   1.06
 
Quarterly amounts may not agree in total to the corresponding annual amounts due to rounding.
                
(In millions, except for per-share amounts)March 31,
2018
 June 30,
2018
 September 30,
2018
 December 31,
2018
Net premium income $4,745
   $4,706
   $4,636
   $4,591
 
Net investment income 837
   862
   870
   874
 
Realized investment gains (losses) (134)   3
   56
   (355) 
Other income (loss) 16
   18
   15
   16
 
Total revenues 5,464
   5,589
   5,577
   5,126
 
Total benefits and expenses 4,482
   4,458
   4,431
   4,404
 
Earnings before income taxes 982
   1,131
   1,146
   722
 
Total income tax 265
   299
   301
   197
 
Net earnings $717
   $832
   $845
   $525
 
Net earnings per basic share $.92
   $1.08
   $1.10
   $.69
 
Net earnings per diluted share .91
   1.07
   1.09
   .69
 

Quarterly amounts may not agree in total to the corresponding annual amounts due to rounding.

17.16.     SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

InEffective January 2020,1, 2023, ALIJ entered into a coinsurance transaction whereby it ceded 28% of the Parent Company used proceeds from senior notes issued in December 2019liabilities associated with certain cancer insurance policies and riders to redeem $350 millionAflac Re Bermuda, which is reported as part of its 4.00% fixed-rate senior notes due February 2022.

corporate and other activities. This transaction transferred approximately $2.1 billion of reserves associated with these policies and will also involve the transfer of assets to support these reserves to Aflac Re Bermuda.
169


175


ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL
DISCLOSURE
There have been no changes in, or disagreements with, accountants on accounting and financial disclosure matters during the years ended December 31, 20192022 and 2021.
2018.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company's management, with the participation of the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this annual report (the “Evaluation Date”). Based on such evaluation, the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the Evaluation Date, the Company's disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

(a) Management's Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management's Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting is incorporated herein by reference from Part II, Item 8 of this report.
(b) Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm on the Company's internal control over financial reporting is incorporated herein by reference from Part II, Item 8 of this report.
(c) Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

ThereDuring 2022, the Company executed internal controls associated with new processes supporting the implementation of Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2018-12 for long-duration insurance contracts (LDTI). These controls provide assurance over the reasonableness of the estimated impact to the Company's accumulated other comprehensive income and retained earnings that is expected at the transition date of January 1, 2021 and the adjusted 2022 and 2021 amounts expected upon adoption of LDTI on January 1, 2023, as disclosed in Note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The Company will continue to refine and maturate the internal controls associated with LDTI. Except for the change in controls over the Company's implementation of LDTI, there have not been any changes in the Company's internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the last fiscal quarter of 20192022 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting. In connection with adoption of new accounting standards associated with accounting for credit losses as detailed in Note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, the Company has implemented a new system, and related processes and controls to ensure appropriate accounting and disclosures are developed and maintained.
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
Not applicable.

ITEM 9C. DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS

Not applicable.
170


176


PART III
Pursuant to General Instruction G to Form 10-K, Items 10 through 14 are incorporated by reference from the Company's definitive Notice and Proxy Statement relating to the Company's 20202023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about March 20, 2020,16, 2023, pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act. The Audit Committee Report and Compensation Committee Report to be included in such proxy statement shall be deemed to be furnished in this report and shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 as a result of such furnishing in Items 10 and 11, respectively.


Refer to the Information Contained in the Proxy
Statement under Captions (filed electronically)
ITEM 10.
DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Information about the Company's Executive Officers -see Part I, Item 1 herein
1.Proposal 1 Election of Directors; Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports; Audit and Risk Committee; Audit and Risk Committee Report; Director Nominating Process; and Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
ITEM 11.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Director Compensation; Compensation Committee; Compensation Committee Report; Compensation Discussion and Analysis; 20192022 Summary Compensation Table; 20192022 Grants of Plan-Based Awards; 20192022 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End; 20192022 Option Exercises and Stock Vested; Pension Benefits; Nonqualified Deferred Compensation; Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change-In-Control; and Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

ITEM 12.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERSPrincipal Shareholders;Beneficial Ownership of the Company's Securities; Security Ownership of Directors; Proposal 1 Election of Directors (Proposal 1);Directors; Security Ownership of Management; and Equity Compensation Plan Information
ITEM 13.CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCERelated Person Transactions; and Director Independence
ITEM 14.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICESProposal 4 Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (Proposal 3);Auditors; and Audit and Risk Committee

171

177


PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a)1.FINANCIAL STATEMENTSPage(s)
(a)1.FINANCIAL STATEMENTSPage(s)
Included in Part II, Item 8, of this report:
       Aflac Incorporated and Subsidiaries:
              Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
       Consolidated Statements of Earnings for each of the years in the three-
           year period ended December 31, 20192022
       Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for each of the
           years in the three-year period ended December 31, 20192022
              Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20192022 and 20182021
       Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity for each of the years
           in the three-year period ended December 31, 20192022
       Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for each of the years in the
           three-year period ended December 31, 20192022
               Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
              Unaudited Consolidated Quarterly Financial Data
2.
2.FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
Included in Part IV of this report:
            Schedule II -Condensed Financial Information of Registrant as of December 31, 20192022 and 2018,2021, and for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 20192022
            Schedule III -Supplementary Insurance Information as of December 31, 20192022 and 2018,2021, and for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 20192022
            Schedule IV -Reinsurance for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 20192022
3.EXHIBIT INDEX
An “Exhibit Index” has been filed as part of this Report beginning on the following page and is incorporated herein by this reference.

Schedules other than those listed above are omitted because they are not required, are not material, are not applicable, or the required information is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto.

In reviewing the agreements included as exhibits to this annual report, please remember they are included to provide you with information regarding their terms and are not intended to provide any other factual or disclosure information about the Company or the other parties to the agreements. The agreements contain representations and warranties by each of the parties to the applicable agreement. These representations and warranties have been made solely for the benefit of the other parties to the applicable agreement and:
should not in all instances be treated as categorical statements of fact, but rather as a way of allocating the risk to one of the parties if those statements prove to be inaccurate;
have been qualified by disclosures that were made to the other party in connection with the negotiation of the applicable agreement, which disclosures are not necessarily reflected in the agreement;
may apply standards of materiality in a way that is different from what may be viewed as material to you or other investors; and
were made only as of the date of the applicable agreement or such other date or dates as may be specified in the agreement and are subject to more recent developments.

Accordingly, these representations and warranties may not describe the actual state of affairs as of the date they were made or at any other time.


178


(b)
EXHIBIT INDEX(1)
-Articles of Incorporation, as amended – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for June 30, 2008, Exhibit 3.0.
-Bylaws of the Corporation, as amended and restated – incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated February 11, 2022, Exhibit 3.1.
4.0-There are no instruments with respect to long-term debt not being registered in which the total amount of securities authorized exceeds 10% of the total assets of Aflac Incorporated and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. The Company agrees to furnish a copy of any long-term debt instrument to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
-Description of common stock securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 – incorporated by reference from 2019 Form 10-K, Exhibit 4.1.
-Indenture, dated as of May 21, 2009, between Aflac Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee – incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated May 21, 2009, Exhibit 4.1.
-Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 17, 2009, between Aflac Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (including the form of 6.900% Senior Note due 2039) – incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated December 14, 2009, Exhibit 4.1.
-Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 9, 2010, between Aflac Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (including the form of 6.45% Senior Note due 2040) - incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated August 4, 2010, Exhibit 4.1.
-Ninth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 7, 2014, between Aflac Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (including the form of 3.625% Senior Note due 2024) - incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated November 4, 2014, Exhibit 4.1.
-Eleventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 12, 2015, between Aflac Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (including the form of 3.25% Senior Note due 2025) - incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated March 9, 2015, Exhibit 4.2.
-Twelfth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 19, 2016, between Aflac Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (including the form of 2.875% Senior Note due 2026) - incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated September 19, 2016, Exhibit 4.1.
-Thirteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 19, 2016, between Aflac Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (including the form of 4.000% Senior Note due 2046) – incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated September 19, 2016, Exhibit 4.2.
-Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of January 25, 2017, between Aflac Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (including the form of .932% Senior Note due 2027) – incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated January 25, 2017, Exhibit 4.1.
-Fifteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 18, 2018, between Aflac Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (including the form of 1.159% Senior Note due 2030) – incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated October 18, 2018, Exhibit 4.1.
-Sixteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 18, 2018, between Aflac Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (including the form of 1.488% Senior Note due 2033) – incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated October 18, 2018, Exhibit 4.2.
-Seventeenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 18, 2018, between Aflac Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (including the form of 1.750% Senior Note due 2038) – incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated October 18, 2018, Exhibit 4.3.
-Eighteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 31, 2018, between Aflac Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (including the form of 4.750% Senior Note due 2049) – incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated October 31, 2018, Exhibit 4.1.
-Nineteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 17, 2019, between Aflac Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (including the form of 0.500% Senior Note due 2029) – incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated December 17, 2019, Exhibit 4.1.
-Twentieth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 17, 2019, between Aflac Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (including the form of 0.843% Senior Note due 2031) – incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated December 17, 2019, Exhibit 4.2.
-Twenty-First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 17, 2019, between Aflac Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (including the form of 0.934% Senior Note due 2034) – incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated December 17, 2019, Exhibit 4.3.
172


179


-Twenty-Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 17, 2019, between Aflac Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (including the form of 1.122% Senior Note due 2039) – incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated December 17, 2019, Exhibit 4.4.
-Twenty-Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 12, 2020, between Aflac Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (including the form of 0.300% Senior Note due 2025) – incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated March 12, 2020, Exhibit 4.1.
-Twenty-Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 12, 2020, between Aflac Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (including the form of 0.550% Senior Note due 2030) – incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated March 12, 2020, Exhibit 4.2.
-Twenty-Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 12, 2020, between Aflac Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (including the form of 0.750% Senior Note due 2032) – incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated March 12, 2020, Exhibit 4.3.
-Twenty-Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 12, 2020, between Aflac Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (including the form of 0.830% Senior Note due 2035) – incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated March 12, 2020, Exhibit 4.4.
-Twenty-Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 1, 2020, between Aflac Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (including the form of 3.600% Senior Note due 2030) – incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated April 1, 2020, Exhibit 4.1.
-Twenty-Eighth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 8, 2021, between Aflac Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (including the form of 1.125% Senior Sustainability Note due 2026) – incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated March 8, 2021, Exhibit 4.1.
-Twenty-Ninth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 15, 2021, between Aflac Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (including the form of 0.633% Senior Note due 2031) – incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated April 15, 2021, Exhibit 4.1.
-Thirtieth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 15, 2021, between Aflac Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (including the form of 0.844% Senior Note due 2033) – incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated April 15, 2021, Exhibit 4.2.
-Thirty-First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 15, 2021, between Aflac Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (including the form of 1.039% Senior Note due 2036) – incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated April 15, 2021, Exhibit 4.3.
-Thirty-Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 15, 2021, between Aflac Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (including the form of 1.264% Senior Note due 2041) – incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated April 15, 2021, Exhibit 4.4.
-Thirty-Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 15, 2021, between Aflac Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (including the form of 1.560% Senior Note due 2051) – incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated April 15, 2021, Exhibit 4.5.
-Thirty-Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 14, 2022, between Aflac Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (including the form of 1.075% Senior Note due 2029) – incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated September 14, 2022, Exhibit 4.1.
-Thirty-Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 14, 2022, between Aflac Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (including the form of 1.320% Senior Note due 2032) – incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated September 14, 2022, Exhibit 4.2.
-Thirty-Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 14, 2022, between Aflac Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (including the form of 1.594% Senior Note due 2037) – incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated September 14, 2022, Exhibit 4.3.
-Thirty-Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 14, 2022, between Aflac Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (including the form of 2.144% Senior Note due 2052) – incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated September 14, 2022, Exhibit 4.4.
-Subordinated Indenture, dated as of September 26, 2012, between Aflac Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee – incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated September 26, 2012, Exhibit 4.1.
-Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 23, 2017, between Aflac Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (including the form of 2.108% Subordinated Debenture due 2047) - incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated October 23, 2017, Exhibit 4.1.
-American Family Corporation Retirement Plan for Senior Officers, as amended and restated October 1, 1989 – incorporated by reference from 1993 Form 10-K, Exhibit 10.2.


180


-Amendment to American Family Corporation Retirement Plan for Senior Officers, dated December 8, 2008 – incorporated by reference from 2008 Form 10-K, Exhibit 10.1.
-Second Amendment to the American Family Corporation Retirement Plan for Senior Officers, dated November 16, 2012 – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for September 30, 2016, Exhibit 10.2.
-Third Amendment to the American Family Corporation Retirement Plan for Senior Officers, dated October 18, 2016 – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for September 30, 2016, Exhibit 10.3.
-Aflac Incorporated Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, as amended and restated January 1, 2009 – incorporated by reference from 2008 Form 10-K, Exhibit 10.5.
-First Amendment to the Aflac Incorporated Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, as amended and restated January 1, 2009 – incorporated by reference from 2012 Form 10-K, Exhibit 10.3.
-Second Amendment to the Aflac Incorporated Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, as amended and restated January 1, 2009 – incorporated by reference from 2014 Form 10-K, Exhibit 10.4.
-Aflac Incorporated Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and restated, effective January 1, 2020 – incorporated by reference from 2019 Form 10-K, Exhibit 10.11.
-First Amendment to the Aflac Incorporated Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended
and restated, effective January 1, 2020 – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for June 30, 2020, Exhibit 10.1.
-Second Amendment to the Aflac Incorporated Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended
and restated, effective January 1, 2020 – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for September 30, 2022, Exhibit 10.1.
-Aflac Incorporated 2018 Management Incentive Plan - incorporated by reference from the 2017 Proxy Statement, Appendix B.
-1999 Aflac Associate Stock Bonus Plan, amended and restated as of February 1, 2021 – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for March 31, 2021, Exhibit 10.1.
-2004 Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated March 14, 2012 – incorporated by reference from the 2012 Proxy Statement, Appendix A.
-Form of Non-Employee Director Stock Option Agreement (NQSO) under the 2004 Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated March 14, 2012 – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for March 31, 2016, Exhibit 10.13.
-U.S. Form of Employee Stock Option Agreement (Non-Qualifying Stock Option) under the 2004 Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated March 14, 2012 – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for March 31, 2016, Exhibit 10.21.
-Japan Form of Employee Stock Option Agreement (Non-Qualifying Stock Option) under the 2004 Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated March 14, 2012 – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for March 31, 2016, Exhibit 10.22.
-U.S. Form of Employee Stock Option Agreement (Incentive Stock Option) under the 2004 Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated March 14, 2012 – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for March 31, 2016, Exhibit 10.23.
-Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated February 14, 2017 – incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated May 1, 2017, Exhibit 10.1.
-First Amendment to the Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated February 14, 2017 – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for September 30, 2022, Exhibit 10.2.
-Form of Non-Employee Director Stock Option Agreement (Non-Qualifying Stock Option) under the Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated February 14, 2017 – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for June 30, 2017, Exhibit 10.33.
-Form of Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated February 14, 2017 – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for June 30, 2017, Exhibit 10.34.
-U.S. Form of Employee Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated February 14, 2017 – incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated February 11, 2022, Exhibit 10.1.
-Japan Form of Employee Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated February 14, 2017 – incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated February 11, 2022, Exhibit 10.2.
-Aflac Incorporated Retirement Plan for Directors Emeritus, as amended and restated, dated February 9, 2010 – incorporated by reference from 2009 Form 10-K, Exhibit 10.26.


181


-Amendment to Aflac Incorporated Retirement Plan for Directors Emeritus, as amended and restated, dated August 10, 2010 – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for September 30, 2010, Exhibit 10.27.
-Aflac Life Insurance Japan Ltd. Officer Retirement Plan – incorporated by reference from 2019 Form 10-K, Exhibit 10.43.
-Aflac Incorporated Employment Agreement with Daniel P. Amos, as amended and restated, dated August 20, 2015 – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for September 30, 2015, Exhibit 10.29.
-Aflac Employment Agreement with Eric M. Kirsch, as amended and restated, dated December 1, 2015 – incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated December 1, 2015, Exhibit 10.1.
-Amendment to Aflac Employment Agreement with Eric M. Kirsch, dated November 30, 2017 – incorporated by reference from 2017 Form 10-K, Exhibit 10.42.
-Aflac Incorporated Letter of Agreement with Eric M. Kirsch, dated October 21, 2022.
-Aflac Incorporated Consulting Agreement with Eric M. Kirsch, dated October 21, 2022.
-Aflac Incorporated Employment Agreement with Frederick J. Crawford, effective June 30, 2015 – incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated June 24, 2015, Exhibit 10.1.
-Amendment to Aflac Incorporated Employment Agreement with Frederick J. Crawford, dated April 29, 2021 – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for March 31, 2021, Exhibit 10.2.
-Amendment to Aflac Incorporated Employment Agreement with Frederick J. Crawford, dated October 24, 2022.
-International Assignment Letter with Frederick J. Crawford, dated December 19, 2022.
-Aflac Incorporated Employment Agreement with Audrey Boone Tillman, dated June 11, 2015 – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for March 31, 2018, Exhibit 10.6.
-Amendment to Aflac Incorporated Employment Agreement with Audrey Boone Tillman, dated October 24, 2022.
-Aflac Incorporated Employment Agreement with Max K. Brodén, dated April 29, 2021 – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for March 31, 2021, Exhibit 10.3.
Amendment to Aflac Incorporated Employment Agreement with Max K. Brodén, dated October 24, 2022.
-Agency Services Agreement, dated March 1, 2008, by and between Japan Post Network Co., Ltd. and Aflac – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for March 31, 2020, Exhibit 10.2.
-Amendment Agreement to Agency Services Agreement, dated June 27, 2016, by and between
Japan Post Co., Ltd. and Aflac – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for March 31, 2020, Exhibit 10.3.
-Basic Agreement regarding the “Strategic Alliance Based on Capital Relationship”, dated December  19, 2018, by and among Japan Post Holdings Co., Ltd., Aflac Incorporated and Aflac Life Insurance Japan Ltd. – incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated December 19, 2018, Exhibit 10.1.
-Letter Agreement, dated December 19, 2018, by and between Japan Post Holdings Co., Ltd. and Aflac Incorporated – incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated December 19, 2018, Exhibit 10.2.
-Shareholders Agreement, dated February 28, 2019, by and between Aflac Incorporated, Japan Post Holdings Co., Ltd., J&A Alliance Holdings Corporation (solely in its capacity as trustee of J&A Alliance Trust), and General Incorporated Association J&A Alliance – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for March 31, 2019, Exhibit 10.50.
-Subsidiaries.
-Consent of independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP, to Form S-8 Registration Statement No. 333-158969 with respect to the Aflac Incorporated 401(k) Savings and Profit Sharing Plan.
-Consent of independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP, to Form S-8 Registration Statement Nos. 333-135327, 333-161269, 333-202781, and 333-245702 with respect to the Aflac Incorporated Executive Deferred Compensation Plan.
-Consent of independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP, to Form S-8 Registration Statement No. 333-115105 and 333-219888 with respect to the Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan.
-Consent of independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP, to Form S-3 Registration Statement No. 333-242390 with respect to the AFL Stock Plan.
-Consent of independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP, to Form S-3 Registration Statement No. 333-237969 with respect to the resale of Aflac Incorporated common stock by J&A Alliance Holdings Corporation in its capacity as the trustee of J&A Alliance Trust.
-Consent of independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP, to Form S-3 Registration Statement No. 333-259379 with respect to the Aflac Incorporated shelf registration statement.


182


-Certification of CEO dated February 23, 2023, required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
-Certification of CFO dated February 23, 2023, required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
-Certification of CEO and CFO dated February 23, 2023, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.INS-XBRL Instance Document - the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.
101.SCH-Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema.
101.CAL-Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase.
101.DEF-Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase.
101.LAB-Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase.
101.PRE-Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase.
104-Cover Page Interactive Data File - formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101.
(1)Copies of any exhibit are available upon request by calling the Company's Investor Relations Department at 800.235.2667 - option 3
*Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit pursuant to Item 15(b) of this report.
**Portions of this exhibit have been redacted in compliance with Regulation S-K Item 601(b)(10).


183


(c)FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES


SCHEDULE II
CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT

Aflac Incorporated (Parent Only)
Condensed Statements of Earnings
 Years ended December 31,
(In millions)202220212020
Revenues:
   Management and service fees from subsidiaries(1)
$136 $130 $131 
   Net investment income3 (93)62 
   Interest from subsidiaries(1)
2 
   Net investment gains (losses)(228)206 399 
     Total revenues(87)245 595 
Operating expenses:
   Interest expense215 222 221 
   Other operating expenses(2)
275 300 277 
     Total operating expenses490 522 498 
   Earnings before income taxes and equity in earnings of
     subsidiaries
(577)(277)97 
Income tax expense (benefit)(208)(144)(15)
   Earnings before equity in earnings of subsidiaries(369)(133)112 
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries(1)
4,570 4,458 4,666 
     Net earnings$4,201 $4,325 $4,778 
(1)Eliminated in consolidation
(2)Includes expense of $48 in 2021 and $15 in 2020 for the early extinguishment of debt
See the accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial Statements.
See the accompanying Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.




184


SCHEDULE II
CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT
Aflac Incorporated (Parent Only)
Condensed Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
  Years ended December 31,
(In millions)202220212020
Net earnings$4,201 $4,325 $4,778 
Other comprehensive income (loss) before income taxes:
Unrealized foreign currency translation gains (losses) during period(1,080)(889)510 
Unrealized gains (losses) on fixed maturity securities during period(13,056)(960)1,220 
Unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives during period4 (1)
Pension liability adjustment during period165 148 (7)
Total other comprehensive income (loss) before income taxes(13,967)(1,696)1,722 
Income tax expense (benefit) related to items of other comprehensive
   income (loss)
(2,169)(155)251 
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of income taxes(11,798)(1,541)1,471 
Total comprehensive income (loss)$(7,597)$2,784 $6,249 
See the accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial Statements.
See the accompanying Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.




185


SCHEDULE II
CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT
Aflac Incorporated (Parent Only)
Condensed Balance Sheets
  December 31,
(In millions, except for share and per-share amounts)20222021
Assets:
Investments and cash:
Fixed maturity securities available for sale, at fair value
  (amortized cost $1,649 in 2022 and $1,608 in 2021)
$1,744 $1,828 
Investments in subsidiaries(1)
25,197 35,905 
Other investments1,461 1,413 
Cash and cash equivalents1,143 2,097 
Total investments and cash29,545 41,243 
Due from subsidiaries(1)
267 248 
Other assets964 640 
Total assets$30,776 $42,131 
Liabilities and shareholders' equity:
Liabilities:
Employee benefit plans$291 $336 
Notes payable7,069 7,579 
Other liabilities1,051 963 
Total liabilities8,411 8,878 
Shareholders' equity:
Common stock of $.10 par value. In thousands: authorized 1,900,000
  shares in 2022 and 2021; issued 1,354,079 shares in 2022 and 1,352,739
  shares in 2021
135 135 
Additional paid-in capital2,641 2,529 
Retained earnings44,568 41,381 
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss):
Unrealized foreign currency translation gains (losses)(3,640)(2,013)
Unrealized gains (losses) on fixed maturity securities(702)9,602 
Unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives(27)(30)
Pension liability adjustment(36)(166)
Treasury stock, at average cost(20,574)(18,185)
Total shareholders' equity22,365 33,253 
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity$30,776 $42,131 
(1)Eliminated in consolidation
See the accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial Statements.
See the accompanying Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.




186


SCHEDULE II
CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT
Aflac Incorporated (Parent Only)
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
  Years ended December 31,
(In millions)202220212020
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net earnings$4,201 $4,325 $4,778 
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided from
  operating activities:
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries(1)
(4,570)(4,458)(4,666)
Cash dividends received from subsidiaries2,705 2,791 2,060 
Other, net18 408 (331)
Net cash provided (used) by operating activities2,354 3,066 1,841 
Cash flows from investing activities:
Fixed maturity securities sold392 483 438 
Fixed maturity securities purchased(438)(489)(484)
Other investments sold (purchased)(206)(421)(711)
Settlement of derivatives718 135 
Additional capitalization of subsidiaries(1)
(294)(161)(291)
Other, net1 
Net cash provided (used) by investing activities173 (452)(1,042)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Purchases of treasury stock(2,401)(2,301)(1,537)
Proceeds from borrowings1,277 1,153 1,545 
Principal payments under debt obligations(1,416)(700)(350)
Dividends paid to shareholders(979)(855)(769)
Treasury stock reissued17 26 34 
Proceeds from exercise of stock options12 17 12 
Net change in amount due to/from subsidiaries(1)
16 43 (89)
Other, net(7)(26)(27)
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities(3,481)(2,643)(1,181)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents(954)(29)(382)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period2,097 2,126 2,508 
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period$1,143 $2,097 $2,126 
(1)Eliminated in consolidation
See the accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial Statements.
See the accompanying Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.




187


SCHEDULE II
CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT
Aflac Incorporated (Parent Only)
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
The accompanying condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto of Aflac Incorporated and Subsidiaries included in Part II, Item 8 of this report.
(A) Notes Payable
A summary of notes payable as of December 31 follows:
(In millions)20222021
3.625% senior notes paid September 2022$0 $748 
3.25% senior notes paid October 20220 448 
1.125% senior sustainability notes due March 2026397 397 
2.875% senior notes due October 2026298 298 
3.60% senior notes due April 2030992 991 
6.90% senior notes due December 2039221 221 
6.45% senior notes due August 2040254 255 
4.00% senior notes due October 2046394 394 
4.750% senior notes due January 2049541 541 
Yen-denominated senior notes and subordinated debentures:
.300% senior notes due September 2025 (principal amount ¥12.4 billion)93 107 
.932% senior notes due January 2027 (principal amount ¥60.0 billion)450 520 
1.075% senior notes due September 2029 (principal amount ¥33.4 billion)250 
.500% senior notes due December 2029 (principal amount ¥12.6 billion)95 109 
.550% senior notes due March 2030 (principal amount ¥13.3 billion)99 115 
1.159% senior notes due October 2030 (principal amount ¥29.3 billion)220 254 
.633% senior notes due April 2031 (principal amount ¥30.0 billion)225 259 
.843% senior notes due December 2031 (principal amount ¥9.3 billion)70 81 
.750% senior notes due March 2032 (principal amount ¥20.7 billion)155 179 
1.320% senior notes due December 2032 (principal amount ¥21.1 billion)158 
.844% senior notes due April 2033 (principal amount ¥12.0 billion)90 104 
1.488% senior notes due October 2033 (principal amount ¥15.2 billion)114 131 
.934% senior notes due December 2034 (principal amount ¥9.8 billion)73 85 
.830% senior notes due March 2035 (principal amount ¥10.6 billion)79 91 
1.039% senior notes due April 2036 (principal amount ¥10.0 billion)75 86 
1.594% senior notes due September 2037 (principal amount ¥6.5 billion)49 
1.750% senior notes due October 2038 (principal amount ¥8.9 billion)66 77 
1.122% senior notes due December 2039 (principal amount ¥6.3 billion)47 54 
1.264% senior notes due April 2041 (principal amount ¥10.0 billion)75 86 
2.108% subordinated debentures due October 2047 (principal amount ¥60.0 billion)448 517 
1.560% senior notes due April 2051 (principal amount ¥20.0 billion)149 172 
2.144% senior notes due September 2052 (principal amount ¥12.0 billion)90 
Yen-denominated loans:
Variable interest rate loan due August 2027 (.33% in 2022, principal amount
  ¥11.7 billion)
88 
Variable interest rate loan due August 2029 (.43% in 2022 and .41% in 2021,
  principal amount ¥25.3 billion in 2022 and ¥5.0 billion in 2021)
190 43 
Variable interest rate loan due August 2032 (.58% in 2022 and .56% in 2021,
  principal amount ¥70.0 billion in 2022 and ¥25.0 billion in 2021)
524 216 
Total notes payable$7,069 $7,579 
Amounts in the table above are reported net of debt issuance costs and issuance premiums or discounts, if applicable, that are being amortized over the life of the notes.


188



In September 2022, the Parent Company issued four series of senior notes totaling ¥73.0 billion through a public debt offering under its U.S. shelf registration statement. The first series, which totaled ¥33.4 billion, bears interest at a fixed rate of 1.075% per annum, payable semi-annually, and will mature in September 2029. The second series, which totaled ¥21.1 billion, bears interest at a fixed rate of 1.320% per annum, payable semi-annually, and will mature in December 2032. The third series, which totaled ¥6.5 billion, bears interest at a fixed rate of 1.594% per annum, payable semi-annually, and will mature in September 2037. The fourth series, which totaled ¥12.0 billion, bears interest at a fixed rate of 2.144% per annum, payable semi-annually, and will mature in September 2052. These notes are redeemable at the Parent Company’s option at any time, in whole but not in part, upon the occurrence of certain changes affecting U.S. taxation, as specified in the indenture governing the terms of the issuance. In addition, the notes maturing in September 2029, December 2032 and September 2037 are redeemable at the Parent Company's option, in whole or in part from time to time, on or after June 14, 2029, June 14, 2032 and March 14, 2037, respectively, at a redemption price equal to the aggregate principal amount of the applicable series to be redeemed plus accrued and unpaid interest on the principal amount to be redeemed to, but excluding, the date of redemption.

In August 2022, the Parent Company renewed a senior term loan facility with a commitment amount totaling ¥107.0 billion. The first tranche of the facility, which totaled ¥11.7 billion, bears interest at a rate per annum equal to the Tokyo interbank market rate (TIBOR), or alternate TIBOR, if applicable, plus the applicable TIBOR margin and will mature in August 2027. The applicable margin ranges between .225% and .625%, depending on the Parent Company's debt ratings as of the date of determination. The second tranche, which totaled ¥25.3 billion, bears interest at a rate per annum equal to TIBOR, or alternate TIBOR, if applicable, plus the applicable TIBOR margin and will mature in August 2029. The applicable margin ranges between .325% and .725%, depending on the Parent Company's debt ratings as of the date of determination. The third tranche, which totaled ¥70.0 billion, bears interest at a rate per annum equal to TIBOR, or alternate TIBOR, if applicable, plus the applicable TIBOR margin and will mature in August 2032. The applicable margin ranges between .475% and 1.025%, depending on the Parent Company's debt ratings as of the date of determination.

In October 2022, the Parent Company used a portion of the net proceeds from its September 2022 issuance of various series of senior notes to redeem $450 million of its 3.25% senior notes due March 2025.

In September 2022, the Parent Company used a portion of the net proceeds from its September 2022 issuance of various series of senior notes and the August 2022 senior term loan facility to redeem $750 million of its 3.625% senior notes due November 2024.

The aggregate contractual maturities of notes payable during each of the years after December 31, 2022, are as follows:
(In millions)
2023$
2024
202593 
2026700 
2027540 
Thereafter5,795 
Total$7,128 

For further information regarding notes payable, see Note 9 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(B) Derivatives
At December 31, 2022, the Parent Company's outstanding freestanding derivative contracts were swaps, foreign currency forwards and options. The swaps are associated with its notes payable, consisting of cross-currency interest rate swaps, also referred to as foreign currency swaps, associated with certain of the Parent Company's senior notes. The foreign currency forwards and options are designated as derivative hedges of the foreign currency exposure of the Company's net investment in Aflac Japan. The Parent Company does not use derivative financial instruments for trading purposes, nor does it engage in leveraged derivative transactions. For further information regarding these derivatives, see Notes 1, 4 and 9 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.


189


(C) Income Taxes
The Parent Company and its eligible U.S. subsidiaries file a consolidated U.S. federal income tax return. Income tax liabilities or benefits are recorded by each principal subsidiary based upon separate return calculations, and any difference between the consolidated provision and the aggregate amounts recorded by the subsidiaries is reflected in the Parent Company financial statements. For further information on income taxes, see Note 10 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(D) Dividend Restrictions

See Note 13 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding dividend restrictions.
(E) Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information
(In millions)202220212020
Interest paid$211 $213 $209 
Noncash financing activities:
Treasury stock issued for shareholder dividend reinvestment37 32 29 


190


SCHEDULE III
SUPPLEMENTARY INSURANCE INFORMATION
Aflac Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Years ended December 31,
(In millions)Deferred Policy
Acquisition
Costs
Future Policy
Benefits & Unpaid
Policy Claims
Unearned
Premiums
Other
Policyholders'
Funds
2022:
Aflac Japan$5,355 $73,760 $1,716 $6,119 
Aflac U.S.3,238 11,912 113 4 
All other0 305 (4)0 
Intercompany eliminations0 (667)0 0 
Total$8,593 $85,310 $1,825 $6,123 
2021:
Aflac Japan$6,233 $84,079 $2,469 $7,064 
Aflac U.S.3,292 11,798 111 
All other280 (4)
Intercompany eliminations(733)
Total$9,525 $95,424 $2,576 $7,072 
Segment amounts may not agree in total to the corresponding consolidated amounts due to rounding.
Years Ended December 31,
(In millions)Net
Earned
Premiums
Net
Investment
Income
Benefits and
Claims, net
Amortization of
Deferred Policy
Acquisition Costs
Other
Operating
Expenses
Premiums
Written
2022:
Aflac Japan$9,548 $2,867 $6,565 $547 $2,083 $9,474 
Aflac U.S.5,570 759 2,442 605 2,115 5,469 
All other145 30 146 0 395 0 
Total$15,263 $3,656 $9,153 $1,152 $4,593 $14,943 
2021:
Aflac Japan$11,853 $3,139 $7,963 $653 $2,555 $11,600 
Aflac U.S.5,614 752 2,447 517 2,048 5,537 
All other180 (73)166 435 
Total$17,647 $3,818 $10,576 $1,170 $5,038 $17,137 
2020:
Aflac Japan$12,670 $2,856 $8,851 $644 $2,613 $12,312 
Aflac U.S.5,758 702 2,765 570 1,963 5,763 
All other194 80 180 402 
Total$18,622 $3,638 $11,796 $1,214 $4,978 $18,075 
Segment amounts may not agree in total to the corresponding consolidated amounts due to rounding.
See the accompanying Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.






191


SCHEDULE IV
REINSURANCE
Aflac Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Years Ended December 31,
(In millions)Gross
Amount
Ceded to
Other
Companies
Assumed
from Other
companies
Net
Amount
Percentage
of Amount
Assumed
to Net
2022:
Life insurance in force$132,880 $11,755 $34,599 $155,724 22 %
Premiums:
Health insurance$13,058 $384 $235 $12,909 2 %
Life insurance2,329 35 60 2,354 3 
Total earned premiums$15,387 $419 $295 $15,263 2 %
2021:
Life insurance in force$134,577 $7,199 $22,568 $149,946 15 %
Premiums:
Health insurance$14,913 $475 $253 $14,691 %
Life insurance2,944 29 41 2,956 
Total earned premiums$17,857 $504 $294 $17,647 %
2020:
Life insurance in force$148,801 $7,016 $20,662 $162,447 13 %
Premiums:
Health insurance$15,682 $526 $213 $15,369 %
Life insurance3,273 27 3,253 
Total earned premiums$18,955 $553 $220 $18,622 %
Premiums by type may not agree in total to the corresponding consolidated amounts due to rounding.
See the accompanying Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.



192


ITEM 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY
Not applicableapplicable.


173


193



Glossary of Selected TermsCondensed Balance Sheets

Throughout this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the Company may use certain terms which are defined below.

Adjusted Earnings Per Diluted Share Excluding the
  December 31,
(In millions, except for share and per-share amounts)20222021
Assets:
Investments and cash:
Fixed maturity securities available for sale, at fair value
  (amortized cost $1,649 in 2022 and $1,608 in 2021)
$1,744 $1,828 
Investments in subsidiaries(1)
25,197 35,905 
Other investments1,461 1,413 
Cash and cash equivalents1,143 2,097 
Total investments and cash29,545 41,243 
Due from subsidiaries(1)
267 248 
Other assets964 640 
Total assets$30,776 $42,131 
Liabilities and shareholders' equity:
Liabilities:
Employee benefit plans$291 $336 
Notes payable7,069 7,579 
Other liabilities1,051 963 
Total liabilities8,411 8,878 
Shareholders' equity:
Common stock of $.10 par value. In thousands: authorized 1,900,000
  shares in 2022 and 2021; issued 1,354,079 shares in 2022 and 1,352,739
  shares in 2021
135 135 
Additional paid-in capital2,641 2,529 
Retained earnings44,568 41,381 
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss):
Unrealized foreign currency translation gains (losses)(3,640)(2,013)
Unrealized gains (losses) on fixed maturity securities(702)9,602 
Unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives(27)(30)
Pension liability adjustment(36)(166)
Treasury stock, at average cost(20,574)(18,185)
Total shareholders' equity22,365 33,253 
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity$30,776 $42,131 
Impact of Foreign Currency – Adjusted earnings are adjusted revenues less benefits and adjusted expenses. The adjustments to both revenues and expenses account for certain items that cannot be predicted or that are outside management’s control. Adjusted revenues are U.S. GAAP total revenues excluding realized investment gains and losses, except for amortized hedge costs/income related to foreign currency exposure management strategies and net interest cash flows from derivatives associated with certain investment strategies. Adjusted expenses are U.S. GAAP total acquisition and operating expenses including the impact of interest cash flows from derivatives associated with notes payable but excluding any nonrecurring or other items not associated with the normal course of the company’s insurance operations and that do not reflect Aflac’s underlying business performance. The most comparable U.S. GAAP measure is net earnings. Adjusted earnings per share (basic or diluted) are the adjusted earnings for the period divided by the weighted average outstanding shares (basic or diluted) for the period presented. The most comparable U.S. GAAP measure is net earnings per share. This metric is then adjusted using the average yen/dollar exchange rate for the comparable prior year period, which eliminates dollar based fluctuations driven solely from currency rate changes.

Affiliated Corporate Agency – Agency in Japan directly affiliated with a specific corporation that sells insurance policies primarily to its employees

Annualized premiums in forcethe amount of gross premium that a policyholder must pay over a full year in order to keep coverage. The growth of net premiums (defined below) is directly affected by the change in premiums in force and by the change in weighted-average yen/dollar exchange rates.

Earnings Per Basic Share – Net earnings divided by weighted-average number of shares outstanding for the period

Earnings Per Diluted Share – Net earnings divided by the weighted-average number of shares outstanding for the period plus the weighted-average shares for the dilutive effect of share-based awards outstanding

Group Insurance Insurance issued to a group, such as an employer or trade association, that covers employees or association members and their dependents through certificates of coverage

Individual Insurance – Insurance issued to an individual with the policy designed to cover that person and his or her dependents

In-force PoliciesA count of policies that are active contracts at the end of a period.
Net Investment Income – The income derived from interest and dividends on invested assets, after deducting investment expenses

Net premiums – (sometimes referred to as net premium income or net earned premiums) is a financial measure that appears on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Earnings and in its segment reporting. This measure reflects collected or due premiums that have been earned ratably on policies in force during the reporting period, reduced by premiums that have been ceded to third parties and increased by premiums assumed through reinsurance.

New Annualized Premium Sales – (sometimes referred to as new sales or sales) An operating measure that is not reflected on the Company's financial statements. New annualized premium sales generally represent annual premiums on policies the Company sold and incremental increases from policy conversions that would be collected over a 12-month period assuming the policies remain in force for that entire period. For Aflac Japan, new annualized premium sales are determined by applications submitted during the reporting period. For Aflac U.S., new annualized premium sales are determined by applications that are issued during the reporting period. Policy conversions are defined as the positive difference in the annualized premium when a policy upgrades in the current reporting period.

Persistency – Percentage of premiums remaining in force at the end of a period, usually one year. For example, 95% persistency would mean that 95% of the premiums in force at the beginning of the period were still in force at the end of the period

Risk-based Capital (RBC) Ratio – Statutory adjusted capital divided by statutory required capital. This insurance ratio is based on rules prescribed by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) and provides an indication of the amount of statutory capital the insurance company maintains, relative to the inherent risks in the insurer’s operations

Solvency Margin Ratio (SMR) – Solvency margin total divided by one half of the risk total. This insurance ratio is prescribed by the Japan Financial Services Agency (FSA) and is used for all life insurance companies in Japan to measure the adequacy of the company’s ability to pay policyholder claims in the event actual risks exceed expected levels

Total Return to Shareholders – Appreciation of a shareholder’s investment over a period of time, including reinvested cash dividends paid during that time


174



Defined Terms

Throughout this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the Company may use abbreviations, acronyms and defined terms which are defined below.
ACAAffordable Care Act
AFSAvailable-for-Sale
AOCIAccumulated Other Comprehensive Income
APPIAct on the Protection of Personal Information
ASCAccounting Standards Codification
ASOPActuarial Standards of Practice
ASUAccounting Standards Update
BoJBank of Japan
CDSsCredit Default Swaps
CFTCCommodity Futures Trading Commission
CMLsCommercial Mortgage Loans
COSOCommittee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
CSAsCredit Support Annexes
DACDeferred Policy Acquisition Costs
DTLDeferred Tax Liability
Dodd-FrankTitle VII of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010
DTADeferred Tax Asset
ECBEuropean Central Bank
EPSEarnings Per Share
FASBFinancial Accounting Standard Boards
FHLBFederal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta
FIOFederal Insurance Office
FSAJapanese Financial Services Agency
GLBAGramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999
HIPAAHealth Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996
HTMHeld-to-Maturity
IRSInternal Revenue Service
ISDAInternational Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc.
ISOsIncentive Stock Options
Japan Post GroupJapan Post Holdings Co., Ltd., JPC and JPI, collectively
Japan Post HoldingsJapan Post Holdings Co., Ltd.
JGBJapan Government Bond
JPCJapan Post Co. Ltd
JPIJapan Post Insurance Co., Ltd.
LDPLiberal Democratic Party
LIBORLondon Interbank Offered Rate
LIPPCLife Insurance Policyholder Protection Corporation
MD&AManagement's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
MMLsMiddle Market Loans
MOFMinistry of Finance
NAICNational Association of Insurance Commissioners
NDOINebraska Department of Insurance
NOLHGANational Organization of Life and Health Guaranty Associations
NQSOsNon-qualifying Stock Options

175



NRSROsNationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations
NYDFSNew York Department of Financial Services
OISOvernight Index Swap
ORSAOwn Risk and Solvency Assessment
OTCOver-the-Counter
OTTIOther-than-temporary Impairment
PCD Financial AssetsPurchased Credit-Deteriorated Financial Assets
PCI Financial AssetsPurchased Credit-Impaired Financial Assets
PRMPolicy Reserve Matching
PSUsPerformance-based restricted stock units
RBCRisk-Based Capital
S&P 500Standard & Poor's 500 Index
S&P Life and HealthStandard & Poor's Life and Health Insurance Index
SAB 118Staff Accounting Bulletin 118
SAPStatutory Accounting Principles
SCDOISouth Carolina Department of Insurance
SECSecurities and Exchange Commission
SIFMASecurities Industry and Financial Markets Association
Singapore LifeSingapore Life Pte. Ltd.
SMISolvency Modernization Initiative
SMRSolvency Margin Ratio
SOFRSecured Overnight Financing Rate
TACTotal Adjusted Capital
Tax ActTax Cuts and Jobs Act
The PlanAflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan
TIBORTokyo Interbank Market Rate
TREsTransitional Real Estate Loans
TTMTelegraphic Transfer Middle Rate
U.S. GAAPU.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
USTTreasury Obligations of the U.S. Government
VIEsVariable Interest Entities


176



(b)
EXHIBIT INDEX(1)
-Articles of Incorporation, as amended – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for June 30, 2008, Exhibit 3.0.
-Bylaws of the Corporation, as amended and restated – incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated November 10, 2015, Exhibit 3.1.
4.0-There are no instruments with respect to long-term debt not being registered in which the total amount of securities authorized exceeds 10% of the total assets of Aflac Incorporated and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. The Company agrees to furnish a copy of any long-term debt instrument to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
-
Description of common stock securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

-Indenture, dated as of May 21, 2009, between Aflac Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee – incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated May 21, 2009, Exhibit 4.1.
-Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 17, 2009, between Aflac Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (including the form of 6.900% Senior Note due 2039) – incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated December 14, 2009, Exhibit 4.1.
-Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 9, 2010, between Aflac Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (including the form of 6.45% Senior Note due 2040) - incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated August 4, 2010, Exhibit 4.1.
-Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of February 10, 2012, between Aflac Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (including the form of 4.00% Senior Note due 2022) - incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated February 8, 2012, Exhibit 4.2.
-Eighth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 10, 2013, between Aflac Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (including the form of 3.625% Senior Note due 2023) - incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated June 10, 2013, Exhibit 4.1.
-Ninth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 7, 2014, between Aflac Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (including the form of 3.625% Senior Note due 2024) - incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated November 4, 2014, Exhibit 4.1.
-Eleventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 12, 2015, between Aflac Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (including the form of 3.25% Senior Note due 2025) - incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated March 9, 2015, Exhibit 4.2.
-Twelfth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 19, 2016, between Aflac Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (including the form of 2.875% Senior Note due 2026) - incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated September 19, 2016, Exhibit 4.1.
-Thirteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 19, 2016, between Aflac Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (including the form of 4.000% Senior Note due 2046) – incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated September 19, 2016, Exhibit 4.2.
-Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of January 25, 2017, between Aflac Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (including the form of .932% Senior Note due 2027) – incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated January 25, 2017, Exhibit 4.1.
-Fifteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 18, 2018, between Aflac Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (including the form of 1.159% Senior Note due 2030) – incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated October 18, 2018, Exhibit 4.1.
-Sixteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 18, 2018, between Aflac Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (including the form of 1.488% Senior Note due 2033) – incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated October 18, 2018, Exhibit 4.2.
-Seventeenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 18, 2018, between Aflac Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (including the form of 1.750% Senior Note due 2038) – incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated October 18, 2018, Exhibit 4.3.
-Eighteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 31, 2018, between Aflac Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (including the form of 4.750% Senior Note due 2049) – incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated October 31, 2018, Exhibit 4.1.
-Nineteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 17, 2019, between Aflac Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (including the form of 0.500% Senior Note due 2029) – incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated December 17, 2019, Exhibit 4.1.

177



-Twentieth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 17, 2019, between Aflac Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (including the form of 0.843% Senior Note due 2031) – incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated December 17, 2019, Exhibit 4.2.
-Twenty-First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 17, 2019, between Aflac Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (including the form of 0.934% Senior Note due 2034) – incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated December 17, 2019, Exhibit 4.3.
-Twenty-Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 17, 2019, between Aflac Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (including the form of 1.122% Senior Note due 2039) – incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated December 17, 2019, Exhibit 4.4.
-Subordinated Indenture, dated as of September 26, 2012, between Aflac Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee – incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated September 26, 2012, Exhibit 4.1.
-Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 23, 2017, between Aflac Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (including the form of 2.108% Subordinated Debenture due 2047) - incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated October 23, 2017, Exhibit 4.1.
-American Family Corporation Retirement Plan for Senior Officers, as amended and restated October 1, 1989 – incorporated by reference from 1993 Form 10-K, Exhibit 10.2.
-Amendment to American Family Corporation Retirement Plan for Senior Officers, dated December 8, 2008 – incorporated by reference from 2008 Form 10-K, Exhibit 10.1.
-Second Amendment to the American Family Corporation Retirement Plan for Senior Officers, dated November 16, 2012 – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for September 30, 2016, Exhibit 10.2.
-Third Amendment to the American Family Corporation Retirement Plan for Senior Officers, dated October 18, 2016 – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for September 30, 2016, Exhibit 10.3.
-Aflac Incorporated Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, as amended and restated January 1, 2009 – incorporated by reference from 2008 Form 10-K, Exhibit 10.5.
-First Amendment to the Aflac Incorporated Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, as amended and restated January 1, 2009 – incorporated by reference from 2012 Form 10-K, Exhibit 10.3.
-Second Amendment to the Aflac Incorporated Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, as amended and restated January 1, 2009 – incorporated by reference from 2014 Form 10-K, Exhibit 10.4.
-Aflac Incorporated Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and restated, effective September 1, 2015 – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for September 30, 2015, Exhibit 10.5.
-First Amendment to the Aflac Incorporated Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and restated, effective September 1, 2015 – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for September 30, 2016, Exhibit 10.8.
-Second Amendment to the Aflac Incorporated Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and restated, effective September 1, 2015 – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for March 31, 2017, Exhibit 10.9.
-Third Amendment to the Aflac Incorporated Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and restated, effective September 1, 2015 – incorporated by reference from 2018 Form 10-K, Exhibit 10.10.
-Aflac Incorporated Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and restated, effective January 1, 2020.
-Aflac Incorporated 2013 Management Incentive Plan – incorporated by reference from the 2012 Proxy Statement, Appendix B.
-Aflac Incorporated 2018 Management Incentive Plan - incorporated by reference from the 2017 Proxy Statement, Appendix B.
-1999 Aflac Associate Stock Bonus Plan, amended and restated as of January 1, 2013 – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for March 31, 2013, Exhibit 10.10.
-Aflac Incorporated 1997 Stock Option Plan – incorporated by reference from the 1997 Shareholders’ Proxy Statement, Appendix B.

178



-Form of Officer Stock Option Agreement (Non-Qualifying Stock Option) under the Aflac Incorporated 1997 Stock Option Plan – incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated January 28, 2005, Exhibit 10.5.
-Form of Officer Stock Option Agreement (Incentive Stock Option) under the Aflac Incorporated 1997 Stock Option Plan – incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated January 28, 2005, Exhibit 10.6.
-Notice of grant of stock options and stock option agreement to officers under the Aflac Incorporated 1997 Stock Option Plan – incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated January 28, 2005, Exhibit 10.7.
-2004 Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated March 14, 2012 – incorporated by reference from the 2012 Proxy Statement, Appendix A.
-Form of Non-Employee Director Stock Option Agreement (NQSO) under the 2004 Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated March 14, 2012 – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for March 31, 2016, Exhibit 10.13.
-Notice of grant of stock options to non-employee director under the 2004 Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated March 14, 2012 – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for March 31, 2016, Exhibit 10.14.
-Form of Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the 2004 Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated March 14, 2012 – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for March 31, 2016, Exhibit 10.15.
-Notice of restricted stock award to non-employee director under the 2004 Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated March 14, 2012 – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for March 31, 2016, Exhibit 10.16.
-U.S. Form of Employee Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the 2004 Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated March 14, 2012 – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for March 31, 2016, Exhibit 10.17.
-Japan Form of Employee Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the 2004 Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated March 14, 2012 – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for March 31, 2016, Exhibit 10.18.
-Notice of time based restricted stock award under the 2004 Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated March 14, 2012 – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for June 30, 2013, Exhibit 10.22.
-Notice of performance based restricted stock award under the 2004 Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated March 14, 2012 – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for March 31, 2016, Exhibit 10.20.
-U.S. Form of Employee Stock Option Agreement (Non-Qualifying Stock Option) under the 2004 Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated March 14, 2012 – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for March 31, 2016, Exhibit 10.21.
-Japan Form of Employee Stock Option Agreement (Non-Qualifying Stock Option) under the 2004 Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated March 14, 2012 – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for March 31, 2016, Exhibit 10.22.
-U.S. Form of Employee Stock Option Agreement (Incentive Stock Option) under the 2004 Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated March 14, 2012 – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for March 31, 2016, Exhibit 10.23.
-U.S. Notice of grant of stock options under the 2004 Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated March 14, 2012 – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for June 30, 2013, Exhibit 10.28.
-Japan Notice of grant of stock options under the 2004 Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated March 14, 2012 – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for June 30, 2013, Exhibit 10.29.
-Japan Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement under the 2004 Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated March 14, 2012 – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for March 31, 2016, Exhibit 10.26.
-Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated February 14, 2017 – incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated May 1, 2017, Exhibit 10.1.
-Form of Non-Employee Director Stock Option Agreement (Non-Qualifying Stock Option) under the Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated February 14, 2017 – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for June 30, 2017, Exhibit 10.33.
-Form of Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated February 14, 2017 – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for June 30, 2017, Exhibit 10.34.

179



-Notice of time based restricted stock unit and restricted stock unit agreement under the 2004 Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated March 14, 2012 – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for March 31, 2018, Exhibit 10.1.
-2017 Notice of performance based restricted stock and restricted stock award agreement under the 2004 Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated March 14, 2012 – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for March 31, 2018, Exhibit 10.2.
-Notice of time based restricted stock unit and restricted stock unit agreement under the Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated February 14, 2017 – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for March 31, 2018, Exhibit 10.3.
-2018 Notice of performance based restricted stock and restricted stock award agreement under the Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated February 14, 2017 – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for March 31, 2018, Exhibit 10.4.
-Aflac Incorporated Retirement Plan for Directors Emeritus, as amended and restated, dated February 9, 2010 – incorporated by reference from 2009 Form 10-K, Exhibit 10.26.
-Amendment to Aflac Incorporated Retirement Plan for Directors Emeritus, as amended and restated, dated August 10, 2010 – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for September 30, 2010, Exhibit 10.27.
-Aflac Life Insurance Japan Ltd. Officer Retirement Plan.
-Aflac Incorporated Employment Agreement with Daniel P. Amos, as amended and restated, dated August 20, 2015 – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for September 30, 2015, Exhibit 10.29.
-Aflac Employment Agreement with Eric M. Kirsch, as amended and restated, dated December 1, 2015 – incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated December 1, 2015, Exhibit 10.1.
-Amendment to Aflac Employment Agreement with Eric M. Kirsch, dated November 30, 2017 – incorporated by reference from 2017 Form 10-K, Exhibit 10.42.
-Aflac Incorporated Employment Agreement with Frederick J. Crawford, effective June 30, 2015 – incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated June 24, 2015, Exhibit 10.1.
-Aflac Incorporated Employment Agreement with Charles D. Lake II, dated January 1, 2018 – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for March 31, 2018, Exhibit 10.5.
-Amendment to Aflac Incorporated Employment Agreement with Charles D. Lake II, effective January 1, 2020.
-Aflac Incorporated Employment Agreement with Audrey Boone Tillman, dated June 11, 2015 – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for March 31, 2018, Exhibit 10.6.
-Basic Agreement regarding the “Strategic Alliance Based on Capital Relationship”, dated December  19, 2018, by and among Japan Post Holdings Co., Ltd., Aflac Incorporated and Aflac Life Insurance Japan Ltd. – incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated December 19, 2018, Exhibit 10.1.
-Letter Agreement, dated December 19, 2018, by and between Japan Post Holdings Co., Ltd. and Aflac Incorporated – incorporated by reference from Form 8-K dated December 19, 2018, Exhibit 10.2.
-Shareholders Agreement, dated February 28, 2019, by and between Aflac Incorporated, Japan Post Holdings Co., Ltd., J&A Alliance Holdings Corporation (solely in its capacity as trustee of J&A Alliance Trust), and General Incorporated Association J&A Alliance – incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q for March 31, 2019, Exhibit 10.50.
-Subsidiaries.
-Consent of independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP, to Form S-8 Registration Statement No. 333-158969 with respect to the Aflac Incorporated 401(k) Savings and Profit Sharing Plan.
-Consent of independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP, to Form S-8 Registration Statement Nos. 333-135327, 333-161269, and 333-202781 with respect to the Aflac Incorporated Executive Deferred Compensation Plan.
-Consent of independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP, to Form S-8 Registration Statement No. 333-200570 with respect to the Aflac Incorporated Market Director Deferred Compensation Plan.
-Consent of independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP, to Form S-8 Registration Statement No. 333-115105 and 333-219888 with respect to the Aflac Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan.
-Consent of independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP, to Form S-3 Registration Statement No. 333-219784 with respect to the AFL Stock Plan.

180



-Consent of independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP, to Form S-3 Registration Statement No. 333-227244 with respect to the Aflac Incorporated shelf registration statement.
-Certification of CEO dated February 21, 2020, required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
-Certification of CFO dated February 21, 2020, required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
-Certification of CEO and CFO dated February 21, 2020, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.INS-XBRL Instance Document - the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.
101.SCH-Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema.
101.CAL-Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase.
101.DEF-Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase.
101.LAB-Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase.
101.PRE-Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase.
104-Cover Page Interactive Data File - formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101.
(1)
Copies of any exhibit are available upon request by calling the Company's Investor Relations Department at 800.235.2667 - option 3
*Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit pursuant to Item 15(b) of this report.


181



(c)FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES


SCHEDULE II
CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT

Aflac Incorporated (Parent Only)
Condensed Statements of Earnings
 Years ended December 31,
(In millions)2019    2018    2017
Revenues:                 
   Management and service fees from subsidiaries(1)
 $151
      $190
      $297
 
   Net investment income 77
      69
      30
 
   Interest from subsidiaries(1)
 4
      4
      5
 
   Realized investment gains (losses) 98
      (16)      (1) 
     Total revenues 330
      247
      331
 
Operating expenses:                 
   Interest expense 200
      188
      197
 
   Other operating expenses(2)
 221
      225
      180
 
     Total operating expenses 421
      413
      377
 
   Earnings before income taxes and equity in earnings of
subsidiaries
 (91)      (166)      (46) 
Income tax expense (benefit) (22)      (12)      (23) 
   Earnings before equity in earnings of subsidiaries (69)      (154)      (23) 
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries(1)
 3,373
      3,074
      4,627
 
     Net earnings $3,304
      $2,920
      $4,604
 
(1)Eliminated in consolidation
(2)Includes expense of $13 in 2017 for the early extinguishment of debt
See the accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial Statements.
See the accompanying Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.




182


186



SCHEDULE II
CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT
Aflac Incorporated (Parent Only)
Condensed Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)Cash Flows
  Years ended December 31,
(In millions)202220212020
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net earnings$4,201 $4,325 $4,778 
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided from
  operating activities:
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries(1)
(4,570)(4,458)(4,666)
Cash dividends received from subsidiaries2,705 2,791 2,060 
Other, net18 408 (331)
Net cash provided (used) by operating activities2,354 3,066 1,841 
Cash flows from investing activities:
Fixed maturity securities sold392 483 438 
Fixed maturity securities purchased(438)(489)(484)
Other investments sold (purchased)(206)(421)(711)
Settlement of derivatives718 135 
Additional capitalization of subsidiaries(1)
(294)(161)(291)
Other, net1 
Net cash provided (used) by investing activities173 (452)(1,042)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Purchases of treasury stock(2,401)(2,301)(1,537)
Proceeds from borrowings1,277 1,153 1,545 
Principal payments under debt obligations(1,416)(700)(350)
Dividends paid to shareholders(979)(855)(769)
Treasury stock reissued17 26 34 
Proceeds from exercise of stock options12 17 12 
Net change in amount due to/from subsidiaries(1)
16 43 (89)
Other, net(7)(26)(27)
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities(3,481)(2,643)(1,181)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents(954)(29)(382)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period2,097 2,126 2,508 
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period$1,143 $2,097 $2,126 
  Years ended December 31,
(In millions)2019 2018 2017
Net earnings $3,304
   $2,920
   $4,604
 
Other comprehensive income (loss) before income taxes:           
Unrealized foreign currency translation gains (losses) during period 252
   232
   286
 
Unrealized gains (losses) on fixed maturity securities during period 5,852
   (3,109)   1,733
 
Unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives during period (12)   2
   1
 
Pension liability adjustment during period (85)   (25)   9
 
Total other comprehensive income (loss) before income taxes 6,007
   (2,900)   2,029
 
Income tax expense (benefit) related to items of other comprehensive
income (loss)
 1,543
   (797)   631
 
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of income taxes 4,464
   (2,103)   1,398
 
Total comprehensive income (loss) $7,768
   $817
   $6,002
 

(1)
Eliminated in consolidation
See the accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial Statements.
See the accompanying Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.



183


187



SCHEDULE II
CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT
Aflac Incorporated (Parent Only)
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
The accompanying condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto of Aflac Incorporated and Subsidiaries included in Part II, Item 8 of this report.
(A) Notes Payable
A summary of notes payable as of December 31 follows:
(In millions)20222021
3.625% senior notes paid September 2022$0 $748 
3.25% senior notes paid October 20220 448 
1.125% senior sustainability notes due March 2026397 397 
2.875% senior notes due October 2026298 298 
3.60% senior notes due April 2030992 991 
6.90% senior notes due December 2039221 221 
6.45% senior notes due August 2040254 255 
4.00% senior notes due October 2046394 394 
4.750% senior notes due January 2049541 541 
Yen-denominated senior notes and subordinated debentures:
.300% senior notes due September 2025 (principal amount ¥12.4 billion)93 107 
.932% senior notes due January 2027 (principal amount ¥60.0 billion)450 520 
1.075% senior notes due September 2029 (principal amount ¥33.4 billion)250 
.500% senior notes due December 2029 (principal amount ¥12.6 billion)95 109 
.550% senior notes due March 2030 (principal amount ¥13.3 billion)99 115 
1.159% senior notes due October 2030 (principal amount ¥29.3 billion)220 254 
.633% senior notes due April 2031 (principal amount ¥30.0 billion)225 259 
.843% senior notes due December 2031 (principal amount ¥9.3 billion)70 81 
.750% senior notes due March 2032 (principal amount ¥20.7 billion)155 179 
1.320% senior notes due December 2032 (principal amount ¥21.1 billion)158 
.844% senior notes due April 2033 (principal amount ¥12.0 billion)90 104 
1.488% senior notes due October 2033 (principal amount ¥15.2 billion)114 131 
.934% senior notes due December 2034 (principal amount ¥9.8 billion)73 85 
.830% senior notes due March 2035 (principal amount ¥10.6 billion)79 91 
1.039% senior notes due April 2036 (principal amount ¥10.0 billion)75 86 
1.594% senior notes due September 2037 (principal amount ¥6.5 billion)49 
1.750% senior notes due October 2038 (principal amount ¥8.9 billion)66 77 
1.122% senior notes due December 2039 (principal amount ¥6.3 billion)47 54 
1.264% senior notes due April 2041 (principal amount ¥10.0 billion)75 86 
2.108% subordinated debentures due October 2047 (principal amount ¥60.0 billion)448 517 
1.560% senior notes due April 2051 (principal amount ¥20.0 billion)149 172 
2.144% senior notes due September 2052 (principal amount ¥12.0 billion)90 
Yen-denominated loans:
Variable interest rate loan due August 2027 (.33% in 2022, principal amount
  ¥11.7 billion)
88 
Variable interest rate loan due August 2029 (.43% in 2022 and .41% in 2021,
  principal amount ¥25.3 billion in 2022 and ¥5.0 billion in 2021)
190 43 
Variable interest rate loan due August 2032 (.58% in 2022 and .56% in 2021,
  principal amount ¥70.0 billion in 2022 and ¥25.0 billion in 2021)
524 216 
Total notes payable$7,069 $7,579 
Amounts in the table above are reported net of debt issuance costs and issuance premiums or discounts, if applicable, that are being amortized over the life of the notes.


188



In September 2022, the Parent Company issued four series of senior notes totaling ¥73.0 billion through a public debt offering under its U.S. shelf registration statement. The first series, which totaled ¥33.4 billion, bears interest at a fixed rate of 1.075% per annum, payable semi-annually, and will mature in September 2029. The second series, which totaled ¥21.1 billion, bears interest at a fixed rate of 1.320% per annum, payable semi-annually, and will mature in December 2032. The third series, which totaled ¥6.5 billion, bears interest at a fixed rate of 1.594% per annum, payable semi-annually, and will mature in September 2037. The fourth series, which totaled ¥12.0 billion, bears interest at a fixed rate of 2.144% per annum, payable semi-annually, and will mature in September 2052. These notes are redeemable at the Parent Company’s option at any time, in whole but not in part, upon the occurrence of certain changes affecting U.S. taxation, as specified in the indenture governing the terms of the issuance. In addition, the notes maturing in September 2029, December 2032 and September 2037 are redeemable at the Parent Company's option, in whole or in part from time to time, on or after June 14, 2029, June 14, 2032 and March 14, 2037, respectively, at a redemption price equal to the aggregate principal amount of the applicable series to be redeemed plus accrued and unpaid interest on the principal amount to be redeemed to, but excluding, the date of redemption.

In August 2022, the Parent Company renewed a senior term loan facility with a commitment amount totaling ¥107.0 billion. The first tranche of the facility, which totaled ¥11.7 billion, bears interest at a rate per annum equal to the Tokyo interbank market rate (TIBOR), or alternate TIBOR, if applicable, plus the applicable TIBOR margin and will mature in August 2027. The applicable margin ranges between .225% and .625%, depending on the Parent Company's debt ratings as of the date of determination. The second tranche, which totaled ¥25.3 billion, bears interest at a rate per annum equal to TIBOR, or alternate TIBOR, if applicable, plus the applicable TIBOR margin and will mature in August 2029. The applicable margin ranges between .325% and .725%, depending on the Parent Company's debt ratings as of the date of determination. The third tranche, which totaled ¥70.0 billion, bears interest at a rate per annum equal to TIBOR, or alternate TIBOR, if applicable, plus the applicable TIBOR margin and will mature in August 2032. The applicable margin ranges between .475% and 1.025%, depending on the Parent Company's debt ratings as of the date of determination.

In October 2022, the Parent Company used a portion of the net proceeds from its September 2022 issuance of various series of senior notes to redeem $450 million of its 3.25% senior notes due March 2025.

In September 2022, the Parent Company used a portion of the net proceeds from its September 2022 issuance of various series of senior notes and the August 2022 senior term loan facility to redeem $750 million of its 3.625% senior notes due November 2024.

The aggregate contractual maturities of notes payable during each of the years after December 31, 2022, are as follows:
(In millions)
2023$
2024
202593 
2026700 
2027540 
Thereafter5,795 
Total$7,128 

For further information regarding notes payable, see Note 9 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(B) Derivatives
At December 31, 2022, the Parent Company's outstanding freestanding derivative contracts were swaps, foreign currency forwards and options. The swaps are associated with its notes payable, consisting of cross-currency interest rate swaps, also referred to as foreign currency swaps, associated with certain of the Parent Company's senior notes. The foreign currency forwards and options are designated as derivative hedges of the foreign currency exposure of the Company's net investment in Aflac Japan. The Parent Company does not use derivative financial instruments for trading purposes, nor does it engage in leveraged derivative transactions. For further information regarding these derivatives, see Notes 1, 4 and 9 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.


189


(C) Income Taxes
The Parent Company and its eligible U.S. subsidiaries file a consolidated U.S. federal income tax return. Income tax liabilities or benefits are recorded by each principal subsidiary based upon separate return calculations, and any difference between the consolidated provision and the aggregate amounts recorded by the subsidiaries is reflected in the Parent Company financial statements. For further information on income taxes, see Note 10 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(D) Dividend Restrictions

See Note 13 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding dividend restrictions.
(E) Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information
(In millions)202220212020
Interest paid$211 $213 $209 
Noncash financing activities:
Treasury stock issued for shareholder dividend reinvestment37 32 29 


190


SCHEDULE III
SUPPLEMENTARY INSURANCE INFORMATION
Aflac Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Years ended December 31,
(In millions)Deferred Policy
Acquisition
Costs
Future Policy
Benefits & Unpaid
Policy Claims
Unearned
Premiums
Other
Policyholders'
Funds
2022:
Aflac Japan$5,355 $73,760 $1,716 $6,119 
Aflac U.S.3,238 11,912 113 4 
All other0 305 (4)0 
Intercompany eliminations0 (667)0 0 
Total$8,593 $85,310 $1,825 $6,123 
2021:
Aflac Japan$6,233 $84,079 $2,469 $7,064 
Aflac U.S.3,292 11,798 111 
All other280 (4)
Intercompany eliminations(733)
Total$9,525 $95,424 $2,576 $7,072 
Segment amounts may not agree in total to the corresponding consolidated amounts due to rounding.
Years Ended December 31,
(In millions)Net
Earned
Premiums
Net
Investment
Income
Benefits and
Claims, net
Amortization of
Deferred Policy
Acquisition Costs
Other
Operating
Expenses
Premiums
Written
2022:
Aflac Japan$9,548 $2,867 $6,565 $547 $2,083 $9,474 
Aflac U.S.5,570 759 2,442 605 2,115 5,469 
All other145 30 146 0 395 0 
Total$15,263 $3,656 $9,153 $1,152 $4,593 $14,943 
2021:
Aflac Japan$11,853 $3,139 $7,963 $653 $2,555 $11,600 
Aflac U.S.5,614 752 2,447 517 2,048 5,537 
All other180 (73)166 435 
Total$17,647 $3,818 $10,576 $1,170 $5,038 $17,137 
2020:
Aflac Japan$12,670 $2,856 $8,851 $644 $2,613 $12,312 
Aflac U.S.5,758 702 2,765 570 1,963 5,763 
All other194 80 180 402 
Total$18,622 $3,638 $11,796 $1,214 $4,978 $18,075 
Segment amounts may not agree in total to the corresponding consolidated amounts due to rounding.
See the accompanying Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.






191


SCHEDULE IV
REINSURANCE
Aflac Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Years Ended December 31,
(In millions)Gross
Amount
Ceded to
Other
Companies
Assumed
from Other
companies
Net
Amount
Percentage
of Amount
Assumed
to Net
2022:
Life insurance in force$132,880 $11,755 $34,599 $155,724 22 %
Premiums:
Health insurance$13,058 $384 $235 $12,909 2 %
Life insurance2,329 35 60 2,354 3 
Total earned premiums$15,387 $419 $295 $15,263 2 %
2021:
Life insurance in force$134,577 $7,199 $22,568 $149,946 15 %
Premiums:
Health insurance$14,913 $475 $253 $14,691 %
Life insurance2,944 29 41 2,956 
Total earned premiums$17,857 $504 $294 $17,647 %
2020:
Life insurance in force$148,801 $7,016 $20,662 $162,447 13 %
Premiums:
Health insurance$15,682 $526 $213 $15,369 %
Life insurance3,273 27 3,253 
Total earned premiums$18,955 $553 $220 $18,622 %
Premiums by type may not agree in total to the corresponding consolidated amounts due to rounding.
See the accompanying Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.



192

ITEM 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY
Not applicable.



193


Condensed Balance Sheets
  December 31,
(In millions, except for share and per-share amounts)2019 2018
Assets:       
Investments and cash:       
Fixed maturity securities available for sale, at fair value
(amortized cost $1,506 in 2019 and $1,209 in 2018)
 $1,567
   $1,222
 
Investments in subsidiaries(1)
 30,744
   26,230
 
Other investments 36
   21
 
Cash and cash equivalents 2,508
   1,767
 
Total investments and cash 34,855
   29,240
 
Due from subsidiaries(1)
 170
   98
 
Income taxes receivable 337
   176
 
Other assets 405
   390
 
Total assets $35,767
   $29,904
 
Liabilities and shareholders' equity:       
Liabilities:       
Employee benefit plans $323
   $310
 
Notes payable 6,136
   5,765
 
Other liabilities 349
   367
 
Total liabilities 6,808
   6,442
 
Shareholders' equity:       
Common stock of $.10 par value. In thousands: authorized 1,900,000 shares in 2019 and 2018; issued 1,349,309 shares in 2019 and 1,347,540 shares in 2018 135
   135
 
Additional paid-in capital 2,313
   2,177
 
Retained earnings 34,291
   31,788
 
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss):       
Unrealized foreign currency translation gains (losses) (1,623)   (1,847) 
Unrealized gains (losses) on fixed maturity securities 8,548
   4,234
 
Unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives (33)   (24) 
Pension liability adjustment (277)   (212) 
Treasury stock, at average cost (14,395)   (12,789) 
Total shareholders' equity 28,959
   23,462
 
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity $35,767
   $29,904
 

  December 31,
(In millions, except for share and per-share amounts)20222021
Assets:
Investments and cash:
Fixed maturity securities available for sale, at fair value
  (amortized cost $1,649 in 2022 and $1,608 in 2021)
$1,744 $1,828 
Investments in subsidiaries(1)
25,197 35,905 
Other investments1,461 1,413 
Cash and cash equivalents1,143 2,097 
Total investments and cash29,545 41,243 
Due from subsidiaries(1)
267 248 
Other assets964 640 
Total assets$30,776 $42,131 
Liabilities and shareholders' equity:
Liabilities:
Employee benefit plans$291 $336 
Notes payable7,069 7,579 
Other liabilities1,051 963 
Total liabilities8,411 8,878 
Shareholders' equity:
Common stock of $.10 par value. In thousands: authorized 1,900,000
  shares in 2022 and 2021; issued 1,354,079 shares in 2022 and 1,352,739
  shares in 2021
135 135 
Additional paid-in capital2,641 2,529 
Retained earnings44,568 41,381 
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss):
Unrealized foreign currency translation gains (losses)(3,640)(2,013)
Unrealized gains (losses) on fixed maturity securities(702)9,602 
Unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives(27)(30)
Pension liability adjustment(36)(166)
Treasury stock, at average cost(20,574)(18,185)
Total shareholders' equity22,365 33,253 
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity$30,776 $42,131 
(1)Eliminated in consolidation
See the accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial Statements.
See the accompanying Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.



184


186



SCHEDULE II
CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT
Aflac Incorporated (Parent Only)
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
  Years ended December 31,
(In millions)2019 2018 2017
Cash flows from operating activities:           
Net earnings $3,304
   $2,920
   $4,604
 
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided from
operating activities:
           
              Equity in earnings of subsidiaries(1)
 (3,373)   (3,074)   (4,627) 
 Cash dividends received from subsidiaries 3,466
   1,820
   2,001
 
 Other, net (203)   99
   (46) 
Net cash provided (used) by operating activities 3,194
   1,765
   1,932
 
Cash flows from investing activities:           
Fixed maturity securities sold 340
   207
   263
 
Fixed maturity securities purchased (639)   (254)   (329) 
Other investments sold (purchased) (16)   31
   (47) 
Settlement of derivatives 22
   (2)   223
 
Additional capitalization of subsidiaries(1)
 (214)   (62)   (69) 
Other, net 87
   (107)   (218) 
Net cash provided (used) by investing activities (420)   (187)   (177) 
Cash flows from financing activities:           
Purchases of treasury stock (1,627)   (1,301)   (1,351) 
Proceeds from borrowings 347
   1,020
   1,040
 
Principal payments under debt obligations 0
   (550)   (1,161) 
Dividends paid to shareholders (771)   (793)   (661) 
Treasury stock reissued 49
   58
   33
 
Proceeds from exercise of stock options 29
   34
   38
 
       Net change in amount due to/from subsidiaries(1)
 (58)   (4)   (5) 
Other, net (2)   0
   0
 
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities (2,033)   (1,536)   (2,067) 
Net change in cash and cash equivalents 741
   42
   (312) 
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period 1,767
   1,725
   2,037
 
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $2,508
   $1,767
   $1,725
 

  Years ended December 31,
(In millions)202220212020
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net earnings$4,201 $4,325 $4,778 
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided from
  operating activities:
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries(1)
(4,570)(4,458)(4,666)
Cash dividends received from subsidiaries2,705 2,791 2,060 
Other, net18 408 (331)
Net cash provided (used) by operating activities2,354 3,066 1,841 
Cash flows from investing activities:
Fixed maturity securities sold392 483 438 
Fixed maturity securities purchased(438)(489)(484)
Other investments sold (purchased)(206)(421)(711)
Settlement of derivatives718 135 
Additional capitalization of subsidiaries(1)
(294)(161)(291)
Other, net1 
Net cash provided (used) by investing activities173 (452)(1,042)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Purchases of treasury stock(2,401)(2,301)(1,537)
Proceeds from borrowings1,277 1,153 1,545 
Principal payments under debt obligations(1,416)(700)(350)
Dividends paid to shareholders(979)(855)(769)
Treasury stock reissued17 26 34 
Proceeds from exercise of stock options12 17 12 
Net change in amount due to/from subsidiaries(1)
16 43 (89)
Other, net(7)(26)(27)
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities(3,481)(2,643)(1,181)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents(954)(29)(382)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period2,097 2,126 2,508 
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period$1,143 $2,097 $2,126 
(1)Eliminated in consolidation
See the accompanying Notes to Condensed Financial Statements.
See the accompanying Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.



185


187



SCHEDULE II
CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT
Aflac Incorporated (Parent Only)
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
The accompanying condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto of Aflac Incorporated and Subsidiaries included in Part II, Item 8 of this report.
(A) Notes Payable
A summary of notes payable as of December 31 follows:
(In millions)2019 2018
4.00% senior notes due February 2022 (1)
 $348
   $348
 
3.625% senior notes due June 2023 698
   698
 
3.625% senior notes due November 2024 747
   746
 
3.25% senior notes due March 2025 448
   447
 
2.875% senior notes due October 2026 298
   297
 
6.90% senior notes due December 2039 220
   220
 
6.45% senior notes due August 2040 254
   254
 
4.00% senior notes due October 2046 394
   394
 
4.750% senior notes due January 2049 541
   540
 
Yen-denominated senior notes and subordinated debentures:       
.932% senior notes due January 2027 (principal amount ¥60.0 billion) 545
     538
  
.500% senior notes due December 2029 (principal amount ¥12.6 billion) 114
   0
 
1.159% senior notes due October 2030 (principal amount ¥29.3 billion) 266
   262
 
.843% senior notes due December 2031 (principal amount ¥9.3 billion) 84
   0
 
1.488% senior notes due October 2033 (principal amount ¥15.2 billion) 138
   136
 
.934% senior notes due December 2034 (principal amount ¥9.8 billion) 88
   0
 
1.750% senior notes due October 2038 (principal amount ¥8.9 billion) 81
   79
 
1.122% senior notes due December 2039 (principal amount ¥6.3 billion) 57
   0
 
2.108% subordinated debentures due October 2047 (principal amount ¥60.0 billion) 543
   536
 
Yen-denominated loans:       
Variable interest rate loan due September 2026 (.42% in 2019 and .32 in 2018, principal amount ¥5.0 billion) 45
   45
 
Variable interest rate loan due September 2029 (.57% in 2019 and .47 in 2018, principal amount ¥25.0 billion) 227
   225
 
Total notes payable $6,136
     $5,765
  

(1) Redeemed in January 2020
(In millions)20222021
3.625% senior notes paid September 2022$0 $748 
3.25% senior notes paid October 20220 448 
1.125% senior sustainability notes due March 2026397 397 
2.875% senior notes due October 2026298 298 
3.60% senior notes due April 2030992 991 
6.90% senior notes due December 2039221 221 
6.45% senior notes due August 2040254 255 
4.00% senior notes due October 2046394 394 
4.750% senior notes due January 2049541 541 
Yen-denominated senior notes and subordinated debentures:
.300% senior notes due September 2025 (principal amount ¥12.4 billion)93 107 
.932% senior notes due January 2027 (principal amount ¥60.0 billion)450 520 
1.075% senior notes due September 2029 (principal amount ¥33.4 billion)250 
.500% senior notes due December 2029 (principal amount ¥12.6 billion)95 109 
.550% senior notes due March 2030 (principal amount ¥13.3 billion)99 115 
1.159% senior notes due October 2030 (principal amount ¥29.3 billion)220 254 
.633% senior notes due April 2031 (principal amount ¥30.0 billion)225 259 
.843% senior notes due December 2031 (principal amount ¥9.3 billion)70 81 
.750% senior notes due March 2032 (principal amount ¥20.7 billion)155 179 
1.320% senior notes due December 2032 (principal amount ¥21.1 billion)158 
.844% senior notes due April 2033 (principal amount ¥12.0 billion)90 104 
1.488% senior notes due October 2033 (principal amount ¥15.2 billion)114 131 
.934% senior notes due December 2034 (principal amount ¥9.8 billion)73 85 
.830% senior notes due March 2035 (principal amount ¥10.6 billion)79 91 
1.039% senior notes due April 2036 (principal amount ¥10.0 billion)75 86 
1.594% senior notes due September 2037 (principal amount ¥6.5 billion)49 
1.750% senior notes due October 2038 (principal amount ¥8.9 billion)66 77 
1.122% senior notes due December 2039 (principal amount ¥6.3 billion)47 54 
1.264% senior notes due April 2041 (principal amount ¥10.0 billion)75 86 
2.108% subordinated debentures due October 2047 (principal amount ¥60.0 billion)448 517 
1.560% senior notes due April 2051 (principal amount ¥20.0 billion)149 172 
2.144% senior notes due September 2052 (principal amount ¥12.0 billion)90 
Yen-denominated loans:
Variable interest rate loan due August 2027 (.33% in 2022, principal amount
  ¥11.7 billion)
88 
Variable interest rate loan due August 2029 (.43% in 2022 and .41% in 2021,
  principal amount ¥25.3 billion in 2022 and ¥5.0 billion in 2021)
190 43 
Variable interest rate loan due August 2032 (.58% in 2022 and .56% in 2021,
  principal amount ¥70.0 billion in 2022 and ¥25.0 billion in 2021)
524 216 
Total notes payable$7,069 $7,579 
Amounts in the table above are reported net of debt issuance costs and issuance premiums or discounts, if applicable, that are being amortized over the life of the notes.


188



In December 2019,September 2022, the Parent Company issued 4four series of senior notes totaling ¥38.0¥73.0 billion through a public debt offering under its U.S. shelf registration statement. The first series, which totaled ¥12.6¥33.4 billion, bears interest at a fixed rate of .500%1.075% per annum, payable semi-annually, and will mature in September 2029. The second series, which totaled ¥21.1 billion, bears interest at a fixed rate of 1.320% per annum, payable semi-annually, and will mature in December 2029.2032. The secondthird series, which totaled ¥9.3¥6.5 billion, bears interest at a fixed rate of .843%1.594% per annum, payable semi-annually, and will mature in December 2031.September 2037. The thirdfourth series, which totaled ¥9.8¥12.0 billion, bears interest at a fixed rate of .934%2.144% per annum, payable semi-annually, and will mature in December 2034. The fourth series, which totaled ¥6.3 billion, bears interest at a fixed rate of 1.122% per annum, payable semi-annually, and will mature in December 2039.September 2052. These notes may only be redeemed before maturity,are redeemable at the Parent Company’s option at any time, in whole but not in part, upon the occurrence of certain changes affecting U.S. taxation, as specified in the indenture governing the terms of the issuance.

In addition, the notes maturing in September 2029, December 2032 and September 2037 are redeemable at the Parent Company's option, in whole or in part from time to time, on or after June 14, 2029, June 14, 2032 and March 14, 2037, respectively, at a redemption price equal to the aggregate principal amount of the applicable series to be redeemed plus accrued and unpaid interest on the principal amount to be redeemed to, but excluding, the date of redemption.

In September 2019,August 2022, the Parent Company renewed a ¥30.0 billion senior term loan facility.facility with a commitment amount totaling ¥107.0 billion. The first tranche of the facility, which totaled ¥5.0¥11.7 billion, bears interest at a rate per annum equal to the Tokyo interbank market rate (TIBOR), or alternate TIBOR, if applicable, plus the applicable TIBOR margin and will mature in September 2026.August 2027. The applicable margin ranges

186




between .30%.225% and .70%.625%, depending on the Parent Company's debt ratings as of the date of determination. The second tranche, which totaled ¥25.0¥25.3 billion, bears interest at a rate per annum equal to the TIBOR, or alternate TIBOR, if applicable, plus the applicable TIBOR margin and will mature in SeptemberAugust 2029. The applicable margin ranges between .45%.325% and 1.00%.725%, depending on the Parent Company's debt ratings as of the date of determination. The third tranche, which totaled ¥70.0 billion, bears interest at a rate per annum equal to TIBOR, or alternate TIBOR, if applicable, plus the applicable TIBOR margin and will mature in August 2032. The applicable margin ranges between .475% and 1.025%, depending on the Parent Company's debt ratings as of the date of determination.

In October 2022, the Parent Company used a portion of the net proceeds from its September 2022 issuance of various series of senior notes to redeem $450 million of its 3.25% senior notes due March 2025.

In September 2022, the Parent Company used a portion of the net proceeds from its September 2022 issuance of various series of senior notes and the August 2022 senior term loan facility to redeem $750 million of its 3.625% senior notes due November 2024.

The aggregate contractual maturities of notes payable during each of the years after December 31, 2019,2022, are as follows:
(In millions)
2023$
2024
202593 
2026700 
2027540 
Thereafter5,795 
Total$7,128 
(In millions)  
2020$0
 
20210
 
2022350
 
2023700
 
2024750
 
Thereafter4,386
 
Total$6,186
 

For further information regarding notes payable, see Note 9 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(B) Derivatives
At December 31, 2019,2022, the Parent Company's outstanding freestanding derivative contracts were swaps, foreign currency forwards and options. The swaps are associated with its notes payable, consisting of cross-currency interest rate swaps, also referred to as foreign currency swaps, associated with certain of the Parent Company's senior notes due in February 2022, June 2023, November 2024 and March 2025.notes. The foreign currency forwards and options are designated as derivative hedges of the foreign currency exposure of the Company's net investment in Aflac Japan. The Parent Company does not use derivative financial instruments for trading purposes, nor does it engage in leveraged derivative transactions. For further information regarding these derivatives, see Notes 1, 4 and 9 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.


189


(C) Income Taxes
The Parent Company and its eligible U.S. subsidiaries file a consolidated U.S. federal income tax return. Income tax liabilities or benefits are recorded by each principal subsidiary based upon separate return calculations, and any difference between the consolidated provision and the aggregate amounts recorded by the subsidiaries is reflected in the Parent Company financial statements. For further information on income taxes, see Note 10 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(D) Dividend Restrictions

See Note 13 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding dividend restrictions.
(E) Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information
(In millions)202220212020
Interest paid$211 $213 $209 
Noncash financing activities:
Treasury stock issued for shareholder dividend reinvestment37 32 29 
(In millions)2019 2018 2017
Interest paid $189
   $179
   $195
 
Noncash financing activities:           
Treasury stock issued for shareholder dividend reinvestment 30
   8
   29
 


187190




SCHEDULE III
SUPPLEMENTARY INSURANCE INFORMATION
Aflac Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Years ended December 31,
(In millions)Deferred Policy
Acquisition
Costs
 Future Policy
Benefits & Unpaid
Policy Claims
 Unearned
Premiums
 Other
Policyholders'
Funds
(In millions)Deferred Policy
Acquisition
Costs
Future Policy
Benefits & Unpaid
Policy Claims
Unearned
Premiums
Other
Policyholders'
Funds
2019:         
2022:2022:
Aflac Japan $6,584
 $84,341
 $4,135
 $7,317
 Aflac Japan$5,355 $73,760 $1,716 $6,119 
Aflac U.S. 3,544
 11,184
 111
 0
 Aflac U.S.3,238 11,912 113 4 
All other 0
 223
 0
 0
 All other0 305 (4)0 
Intercompany eliminations 0
 (754) (3) 0
 Intercompany eliminations0 (667)0 0 
Total $10,128
 $94,994
 $4,243
 $7,317
 Total$8,593 $85,310 $1,825 $6,123 
2018:         
2021:2021:
Aflac Japan $6,384
 $80,672
 $4,977
 $7,145
 Aflac Japan$6,233 $84,079 $2,469 $7,064 
Aflac U.S. 3,491
 10,864
 117
 0
 Aflac U.S.3,292 11,798 111 
All other 0
 183
 0
 1
 All other280 (4)
Intercompany eliminations 0
 (767) (4) 0
 Intercompany eliminations(733)
Total $9,875
 $90,952
 $5,090
 $7,146
 Total$9,525 $95,424 $2,576 $7,072 
Segment amounts may not agree in total to the corresponding consolidated amounts due to rounding.
Years Ended December 31,
(In millions)Net
Premium
Revenue
 Net
Investment
Income
 Benefits and
Claims, net
 Amortization of
Deferred Policy
Acquisition Costs
 Other
Operating
Expenses
 Premiums
Written
2019:                   
Aflac Japan$12,772
  $2,753
   $8,877
   $709
   $2,465
  $12,367
Aflac U.S.5,808
  720
   2,871
   573
   1,834
  5,813
All other200
  105
   194
   0
   339
  0
Total$18,780
  $3,578
   $11,942
   $1,282
   $4,638
  $18,180
2018:                   
Aflac Japan$12,762
  $2,639
   $8,913
   $710
   $2,374
  $12,298
Aflac U.S.5,708
  727
   2,887
   534
   1,736
  5,707
All other207
  76
   200
   1
   420
  0
Total$18,677
  $3,442
   $12,000
   $1,245
   $4,530
  $18,005
2017:                   
Aflac Japan$12,752
  $2,463
   $9,087
   $630
   $2,257
  $12,092
Aflac U.S.5,563
  721
   2,885
   502
   1,658
  5,565
All other216
  36
   209
   0
   421
  0
Total$18,531
  $3,220
   $12,181
   $1,132
   $4,336
  $17,657

(In millions)Net
Earned
Premiums
Net
Investment
Income
Benefits and
Claims, net
Amortization of
Deferred Policy
Acquisition Costs
Other
Operating
Expenses
Premiums
Written
2022:
Aflac Japan$9,548 $2,867 $6,565 $547 $2,083 $9,474 
Aflac U.S.5,570 759 2,442 605 2,115 5,469 
All other145 30 146 0 395 0 
Total$15,263 $3,656 $9,153 $1,152 $4,593 $14,943 
2021:
Aflac Japan$11,853 $3,139 $7,963 $653 $2,555 $11,600 
Aflac U.S.5,614 752 2,447 517 2,048 5,537 
All other180 (73)166 435 
Total$17,647 $3,818 $10,576 $1,170 $5,038 $17,137 
2020:
Aflac Japan$12,670 $2,856 $8,851 $644 $2,613 $12,312 
Aflac U.S.5,758 702 2,765 570 1,963 5,763 
All other194 80 180 402 
Total$18,622 $3,638 $11,796 $1,214 $4,978 $18,075 
Segment amounts may not agree in total to the corresponding consolidated amounts due to rounding.
See the accompanying Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.





188


191



SCHEDULE IV
REINSURANCE
Aflac Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Years Ended December 31,
(In millions)Gross
Amount
 Ceded to
Other
Companies
 Assumed
from Other
companies
 Net
Amount
 Percentage
of Amount
Assumed
to Net
2019:               
Life insurance in force$146,585
  $6,592
   $0
  $139,993
  0% 
Premiums:               
Health insurance$15,657
  $527
   $205
  $15,335
  1% 
Life insurance3,465
  20
   0
  3,445
  0
 
Total earned premiums$19,122
  $547
   $205
  $18,780
  1% 
2018:               
Life insurance in force$151,457
  $4,702
   $0
  $146,755
  0% 
Premiums:               
Health insurance$15,330
  $541
   $214
  $15,003
  1% 
Life insurance3,688
  14
   0
  3,674
  0
 
Total earned premiums$19,018
  $555
   $214
  $18,677
  1% 
2017:               
Life insurance in force$152,502
  $4,121
   $0
  $148,381
  0% 
Premiums:               
Health insurance$14,829
  $554
   $222
  $14,497
  1% 
Life insurance4,046
  12
   0
  4,034
  0
 
Total earned premiums$18,875
  $566
   $222
  $18,531
  1% 

(In millions)Gross
Amount
Ceded to
Other
Companies
Assumed
from Other
companies
Net
Amount
Percentage
of Amount
Assumed
to Net
2022:
Life insurance in force$132,880 $11,755 $34,599 $155,724 22 %
Premiums:
Health insurance$13,058 $384 $235 $12,909 2 %
Life insurance2,329 35 60 2,354 3 
Total earned premiums$15,387 $419 $295 $15,263 2 %
2021:
Life insurance in force$134,577 $7,199 $22,568 $149,946 15 %
Premiums:
Health insurance$14,913 $475 $253 $14,691 %
Life insurance2,944 29 41 2,956 
Total earned premiums$17,857 $504 $294 $17,647 %
2020:
Life insurance in force$148,801 $7,016 $20,662 $162,447 13 %
Premiums:
Health insurance$15,682 $526 $213 $15,369 %
Life insurance3,273 27 3,253 
Total earned premiums$18,955 $553 $220 $18,622 %
Premiums by type may not agree in total to the corresponding consolidated amounts due to rounding.
See the accompanying Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.


189


192

ITEM 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY
Not applicable.



193


Glossary of Selected Terms

Throughout this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the Company may use certain performance metrics and other terms which are defined below.

Adjusted Net Investment Income - Net Investment Income adjusted for i) amortized hedge cost/income related to foreign currency exposure management strategies and certain derivative activity and ii) net interest cash flows from foreign currency and interest rate derivatives associated with certain investment strategies, which are reclassified from net investment gains and (losses) to net investment income. The Company considers adjusted net investment income important because it provides a more comprehensive understanding of the costs and income associated with the Company's investments and related hedging strategies. The metric is used in segment reporting as a component of segment profitability.

Affiliated Corporate Agency – Agency in Japan directly affiliated with a specific corporation that sells insurance policies primarily to its employees.

Annualized Premiums in ForceThe amount of gross premium that a policyholder must pay over a full year in order to keep coverage. The growth of net earned premiums (defined below) is directly affected by the change in premiums in force and by the change in weighted-average yen/dollar exchange rates.

Average Weekly ProducerThe total number of writing associates who have produced greater than $0.00 during the production week - excluding any manual adjustments divided by the number of weeks in the time period. The Company believes this metric allows sales management to monitor progress and needs, as well as serve as a leading indicator of future production capacity.

Capital Buffer Established dollar amount of liquidity at the Parent Company reserved for injecting capital into the insurance entities or general liquidity support for general expenses at the Parent Company. Currently, the capital buffer is $1.0 billion and is part of $2.0 billion minimum balance at the Parent Company.

Earnings Per Basic Share – Net earnings divided by weighted-average number of shares outstanding for the period.

Earnings Per Diluted Share – Net earnings divided by the weighted-average number of shares outstanding for the period plus the weighted-average shares for the dilutive effect of share-based awards outstanding.

Group Insurance Insurance issued to a group, such as an employer or trade association, that covers
employees or association members and their dependents through certificates of coverage.

Individual Insurance – Insurance issued to an individual with the policy designed to cover that person and his or her dependents.

In-force PoliciesA count of policies that are active contracts at the end of a period.

Liquidity Support – Internally defined and established dollar amount of liquidity reserved for supporting potential collateral and settlements of derivatives at the Parent Company. Currently, the liquidity support is $1.0 billion and is part of the $2.0 billion minimum balance at the Parent Company.
Net Investment Income – The income derived from interest and dividends on invested assets, after deducting investment expenses.

Net Earned Premiums – is a financial measure that appears on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Earnings and in its segment reporting. This measure reflects collected or due premiums that have been earned ratably on policies in force during the reporting period, reduced by premiums that have been ceded to third parties and increased by premiums assumed through reinsurance.

New Annualized Premium Sales – (sometimes referred to as new sales or sales) An operating measure that is not reflected on the Company's financial statements. New annualized premium sales generally represent annual premiums on policies and riders the Company sold and incremental increases from policy conversions that would be collected over a 12-month period assuming the policies remain in force for that entire period. For Aflac Japan, new annualized premium sales are determined by applications submitted during the reporting period. For Aflac U.S., new annualized premium sales are determined by applications. that are issued during the reporting period. Policy conversions are defined as the positive difference in the annualized premium when a policy upgrades in the current reporting period.

New Money Yield Gross yields earned on purchases of fixed maturities, loan receivables, and equities. Purchases exclude capitalized interest, securities lending/repurchase agreements, short-term/cash activity, and alternatives. New money yield for equities is based on the assumed dividend yield at the time of purchase. The new money yield for Aflac Japan excludes the impact of any derivatives and associated amortized hedge costs associated with USD-denominated investments. Management uses this metric as a leading indicator of future investment earning potential.



194


Operating RatiosUsed to evaluate the Company's financial condition and profitability. Examples include: (1) Ratios to total adjusted revenues, which present expenses as a percentage of total revenues and (2) Ratios to total premium, including benefit ratio.
Persistency – Percentage of premiums remaining in force at the end of a period, usually one year. For example, 95% persistency would mean that 95% of the premiums in force at the beginning of the period were still in force at the end of the period.

Pretax Adjusted Earnings – Earnings as adjusted earnings before the application of income taxes. This measure is used in the Company's segment reporting.

Pretax Adjusted Profit Margin – Adjusted earnings divided by adjusted revenues, before taxes are applied. This measure is used in the Company's segment reporting.

Return on Average Invested Assets – Net investment income as a percentage of average invested assets during the period. Management uses this metric to demonstrate how the Company's actual net investment income results represent an overall return on the portfolio to provide a more comparative metric as the size of the Company's investment portfolio changes over time.

Risk-based Capital (RBC) Ratio – Statutory adjusted capital divided by statutory required capital. This insurance ratio is based on rules prescribed by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) and provides an indication of the amount of statutory capital the insurance company maintains, relative to the inherent risks in the insurer’s operations.

Solvency Margin Ratio (SMR) – Solvency margin total divided by one half of the risk total. This insurance ratio is prescribed by the Japan Financial Services Agency (FSA) and is used for all life insurance companies in Japan to measure the adequacy of the company’s ability to pay policyholder claims in the event actual risks exceed expected levels.

Statutory Earnings Earnings determined according to accounting rules prescribed by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC), as modified by the insurance department in the insurance company’s state of domicile. These statutory accounting rules are different from U.S. GAAP and are intended to emphasize policyholder protection and company solvency.

Total Return to Shareholders – Appreciation of a shareholder’s investment over a period of time, including reinvested cash dividends paid during that time.

Weighted-Average Foreign Currency Exchange Rate – Japan segment operating earnings for the period
(excluding hedge costs) in yen divided by Japan segment operating earnings for the period (excluding hedge costs) in dollars. Management uses this metric to evaluate and determine consolidated results on foreign currency effective basis.





195


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 
Aflac Incorporated
Aflac Incorporated
By:/s/ Daniel P. AmosFebruary 21, 202023, 2023
(Daniel P. Amos)
Chief Executive Officer,
Chairman of the Board of Directors

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
 
/s/ Daniel P. Amos
Chief Executive Officer,February 21, 202023, 2023
(Daniel P. Amos)Chairman of the Board of Directors
/s/ Max K. BrodenBrodén
Executive Vice President,February 21, 202023, 2023
(Max K. Broden)Brodén)Chief Financial Officer
/s/ June Howard
Senior Vice President, Financial Services;February 21, 202023, 2023
(June Howard)Chief Accounting Officer
 

190

196






/s/ W. Paul Bowers
DirectorFebruary 21, 202023, 2023
(W. Paul Bowers)
/s/ Arthur R. Collins
DirectorFebruary 23, 2023
(Arthur R. Collins)
/s/ Toshihiko Fukuzawa
DirectorFebruary 21, 202023, 2023
(Toshihiko Fukuzawa)
/s/ Robert B. Johnson
DirectorFebruary 21, 2020
(Robert B. Johnson)
/s/ Thomas J. Kenny
DirectorFebruary 21, 202023, 2023
(Thomas J. Kenny)
/s/ Georgette D. Kiser
DirectorFebruary 21, 202023, 2023
(Georgette D. Kiser)
/s/ Karole F. Lloyd
DirectorFebruary 21, 202023, 2023
(Karole F. Lloyd)
/s/ Nobuchika Mori
DirectorFebruary 23, 2023
(Nobuchika Mori)
/s/ Joseph L. Moskowitz
DirectorFebruary 21, 202023, 2023
(Joseph L. Moskowitz)
/s/ Barbara K. Rimer
DirectorFebruary 21, 202023, 2023
(Barbara K. Rimer)
/s/ Katherine T. Rohrer
DirectorFebruary 21, 202023, 2023
(Katherine T. Rohrer)
/s/ Melvin T. Stith
DirectorFebruary 21, 2020
(Melvin T. Stith)



191


197