UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

   
þ ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 20102011
   
o TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission file number: 0-7914
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

Delaware
(State of Incorporation or Organization)
84-0592823
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
 
633 17th Street, Suite 1645
Denver, Colorado
(Address of principal executive office)
80202-3625
(Zip Code)
 
(303) 296-3076
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered underpursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: NONE
Title of each className of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, $0.001 par value per shareThe NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, $.001 par value
Common Stock, $.001 par value
Preferred Stock Purchase RightsNONE

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No þ

Check whetherIndicate by check mark if the issuerregistrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes o No þ

CheckIndicate by check mark whether the issuer (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to the filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o




Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to post such filed).  Yes o No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (check one):

       
Large accelerated filer o
 
Accelerated filer o
 
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
 
Smaller reporting company þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ

Registrant’s revenues for its most recent fiscal year: $7,269,000$8,206,000

The aggregate market value of registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates was approximately $10,163,524$14,637,376 as of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter.

As of June 18, 2010, 17,102,52110, 2011, 1,712,744 shares of the registrant’s common stock were outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Certain information required by Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 of Part III is incorporated by reference from portions of the registrant’sregistrant's definitive Proxy Statement for its 20102011 Annual Meeting of StockholdersShareholders to be filed, pursuant to Regulation 14A, no later than 120 days after March 31, 2010.2011.


12


FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Current Report on Form 10-K, including information incorporated herein by reference, contains forward-looking statements as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.  These statements are subject to risks and uncertainties and are based on the beliefs and assumptions of management and information currently available to management.  The use of any statements containing the words "anticipate," "intend," "believe," "estimate," "project," "expect," "predict," "plan," "should", "likely", "may", "will", "continue" or similar expressions are intended to identify such statements.  All statements other than statements of historical facts that address activities that we intend, expect or anticipate will or may occur in the future are forward-looking statements.  All forward-looking statements should be evaluated with the understanding of their inherent uncertainty.  Forward-looking statements relate to, among other things:

 •      our strategies,stragegies, either existing or anticipated;
 
•      our future financial position, including anticipated liquidity, including the amount of and liquidity;  
 •our ability to make debt service payments should
     we utilize some or all of our available borrowing capacity; 
satisfy obligations from cash generated from operations; 
 •      amounts and nature of future capital expenditures;
 •      acquisitions and other business opportunities;
 •      operating costs and other expenses;
 •      wells expected to be drilled, other anticipated exploration efforts and the expenses associated therewith;
 our asset retirement obligations; andobligation; 
 •      estimates of proved oil and natural gas reserves, deferred tax assets, and depletion rates.rates; 
 •our ability to meet additional acreage, seismic and/or drilling cost requirements arising from acquisition opportunities; 
 •other estimates and assumptions we use in our accounting policies; and 
 •future share repurchases. 
Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations include, among others, such things as:

    •      oil and natural gas prices;
 •oil and natural gas prices; 
 •our ability to replace oil and natural gas reserves; 
 •loss of senior management or technical personnel; 
 •inaccuracy in reserve estimates and expected production rates; 
 •exploitation, development and exploration results;
 •mechanical failure; 
 •the actual costs related to asset retirement obligation, and whether or not those retirements actually occur in the future; 
 •the potential unavailability of drilling rigs and other field equipment and services; 
 •the existence of unanticipated liabilities or problems relating to acquired properties; 
 •factors affecting the nature and timing of our capital expenditures, including the availability of service contractors and equipment; 
 •the willingness and ability of third parties to honor their contractual commitments; 
 •permitting issues;
 •the nature, extent and duration of  workovers; 
 •the impact and costs related to compliance with or changes in laws governing our operations; 
 •environmental liabilities; 
 •acquisitions and other business opportunities (or the lack thereof) that may be pursued by us; 
 •competition for available properties and the effect of such competition on the price of those properties; 
 •general economic, market or business conditions; 
 •weather; 
 •any change in interest rates or inflation; 
 •a lack of available capital and financing;
    •      our ability to replace oil and natural gas reserves;
    •      loss of senior management or technical personnel;
    •      inaccuracy in reserve estimates and expected production rates;
    •      exploitation, development and exploration results;
    •      costs related to asset retirement obligations;
    •      a lack of available capital and financing;
    •      the potential unavailability of drilling rigs and other field equipment and services;
    •      the existence of unanticipated liabilities or problems relating to acquired properties;
    •      general economic, market or business conditions;
    •      factors affecting the nature and timing of our capital expenditures, including the availability of service contractors and equipment,
 permitting issues, workovers, and weather;
3
    •      the impact and costs related to compliance with or changes in laws governing our operations;
    •      environmental liabilities;
    •      acquisitions and other business opportunities (or the lack thereof) that may be pursued by us;
    •      competition for available properties and the effect of such competition on the price of those properties;
    •      risk factors discussed in this report and other factors, many of which are beyond our control.

• risk factors consistent with comparable companies within our industry, especially companies  with similar market capitalization and/or employee census; and 
other factors, many of which are beyond our control. 
Furthermore, forward-looking statements are made based on our current assessment available at the time. Subsequently obtained information concerning the merits of any property, as well as changes in estimated exploration and development costs and ownership interest, may result in revisions to our expectations and intentions and, thus, we may alter our plans regarding any exploration and development activities.

Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, those expectations may prove to be incorrect.  Disclosure of importantAs with comparable companies within our industry, there are numerous factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations, or cautionaryexpectations.  All forward-looking statements are included in our Annual Report on this Form 10-K, including, without limitation, in conjunction withspeak only as of the forward-looking statements.date made.  All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us, or persons acting on our behalf, are expressly qualified in their entirety by these cautionary statements.  Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which it is made or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events or circumstances.


GLOSSARY OF TERMS

Unless otherwise indicated in this report, natural gas volumes are stated at the legal pressure base of Contentsthe state or geographic area in which the reserves are located at 60 degrees Fahrenheit.  Crude oil and natural gas equivalents are determined using the ratio of six Mcf of natural gas to one barrel of crude oil, condensate or natural gas liquids.

The following definitions shall apply to the technical terms used in this report:

Terms used to describe quantities of crude oil and natural gas:

Bbl” – Barrel or 42 U.S. gallons liquid volume.

BOE” – Barrels of crude oil equivalent.

Condensate” – A mixture of hydrocarbons that exists in the gaseous phase at original reservoir temperature and pressure, but that, when produced, is in the liquid phase at surface pressure and temperature.
 
Mcf” – Thousand cubic feet of gas.

Terms used to describe our interests in wells and acreage:

Gross acres” – The number of acres in which we own a gross working interest.

Gross well” – A well in which we own a working interest.

Net acres” – Our percentage ownership of gross acreage.  Net acres are deemed to exist when the sum of fractional ownership working interests in gross acres equals one (e.g., a 10% working interest in a lease covering 640 gross acres is equivalent to 64 net acres).

Net well” –  Deemed to exist when the sum of fractional ownership working interests in gross wells equals one.

Developed acreage” – Acreage consisting of leased acres spaced or assignable to productive wells.  Acreage included in spacing units of infill wells is classified as developed acreage at the time production commences from the initial well in the spacing unit.  As such, the addition of an infill well does not have any impact on a company’s amount of developed acreage.

Development well” – A well drilled within the proved area of a crude oil or natural gas reservoir to the depth of stratigraphic horizon (rock layer or formation) noted to be productive for the purpose of extracting proved crude oil or natural gas reserves.

Dry hole” – An exploratory or development well found to be incapable of producing either crude oil or natural gas in sufficient quantities to justify completion as a crude oil or natural gas well.

Exploratory well” – A well drilled to find and produce crude oil or natural gas in an unproved area, to find a new reservoir in a field previously found to be producing crude oil or natural gas in another reservoir, or to extend a known reservoir.

Productive well” – An exploratory or a development well that is not a dry hole.

5


Undeveloped acreage” – Leased acres on which wells have not been drilled or completed to a point that would permit the production of economic quantities of crude oil and natural gas, regardless of whether or not such acreage contains proved reserves.  Undeveloped acreage includes net acres under the bit until a productive well is established in the spacing unit.

Unproved property” – A property or part of a property with no proved reserves.

Unsuccessful efforts” – Drilling activities that result in a dry hole.  Costs associated with unsuccessful efforts are part of the cost to discover reserves, therefore are capitalized in the full cost pool.

Terms used to describe seismic activity and operations:

3-D Bright Spot” – A geophysical amplitude anomaly which is simply a velocity change from high to low.  Sands that contain gas are predicted by this method because the gas provides a slower velocity response giving an abnormally intense trough-peak reflection, therefore termed a Bright Spot.

Formation fracturing” – The injection of water, sand and additives under extremely high hydraulic pressure, usually down casing that is cemented in the wellbore, into prospective rock formations at depth to stimulate natural gas and oil production.
Horizontal Drilling” – A drill rig operation of drilling vertically to a defined depth and then mechanically steering the drill bit to drill horizontal within a designated zone typically defined as the prospective pay zone to be completed for oil and/or gas.

Hydraulic stimulation technology” – A process that results in the creation of fractures in rocks.  The fracturing is done from a wellbore drilled into reservoir rock formations to increase the rate and ultimate recovery of oil and natural gas.

Plugging and abandonment” – The sealing off of fluids in the strata penetrated by a well so that the fluids from one stratum will not escape into another or to the surface.  Regulations of all states require plugging of abandoned wells.

Proppant” – A material, such as grains of sand, ceramic, or other particulates, that prevent the fractures from closing when the injection is stopped.

Recompletion” – The process of re-entering an existing wellbore that is either producing or not producing and completing new reservoirs in an attempt to establish or increase existing production.
Workover – Operations on a producing well to restore or increase production.

Terms used to describe the legal ownership of our oil and natural gas properties:

Revenue interest” – The amount of interest owned in the proceeds derived from a producing well less all royalty interests.

Working interest” – The operating interest that gives the owner the right to drill, produce and conduct operating activities on the property and receive a share of production and requires the owner to pay a share of the costs of drilling and production operations.

Terms used to assign a present value to or to classify our reserves:

Possible reserves” – Reserves for which analysis of geoscience and engineering data suggest are less likely to be recoverable than probable reserves.

6


PV-10” – The estimated future cash flow, discounted at a rate of 10% per annum, with no price or cost escalation or de-escalation in accordance with guidelines promulgated by the SEC.

Probable reserves” – Reserves for which analysis of geoscience and engineering data indicate are less likely to be recovered than proved reserves but which together with proved reserves, are as likely as not to be recovered.

Proved developed non-producing reserves” – Proved crude oil and natural gas reserves that are developed behind pipe, shut-in or that can be recovered through improved recovery only after the necessary equipment has been installed, or when the costs to do so are relatively minor.  Shut-in reserves are expected to be recovered from (1) completion intervals which are open at the time of the estimate but which have not started producing, (2) wells that were shut-in for market conditions or pipeline connections, or (3) wells not capable of production for mechanical reasons.  Behind-pipe reserves are expected to be recovered from zones in existing wells that will require additional completion work or future recompletion prior to the start of production.

Proved developed reserves” – Reserves that can be expected to be recovered through existing wells with existing equipment and operating methods.  Additional crude oil and natural gas expected to be obtained through the application of fluid injection or other improved recovery techniques for supplementing the natural forces and mechanisms of primary recovery are included in “proved developed reserves” only after testing by a pilot project or after the operation of an installed program has confirmed through production response that increased recovery will be achieved.
Proved reserves” – Proved crude oil and natural gas reserves are those quantities of crude oil and natural gas, which, by analysis of geoscience and engineering data, can be estimated with reasonable certainty to be economically producible – from a given date forward, from known reservoirs, and under existing economic conditions, operating methods, and government regulations – prior to the time at which contracts providing the right to operate expire, unless evidence indicates that renewal is reasonably certain, regardless of whether deterministic or probabilistic methods are used for the estimation.  The project to extract the hydrocarbons must have commenced or the operator must be reasonably certain that it will commence the project within a reasonable time.

Proved undeveloped reserves” – Proved crude oil and natural gas reserves that are expected to be recovered from new wells on undrilled acreage or from existing wells where a relatively major expenditure is required for development.  Reserves on undrilled acreage are limited to those drilling units offsetting productive units that are reasonably certain of production when drilled.  Proved reserves for other undrilled units are claimed only where it can be demonstrated with certainty that there is continuity of production from the existing productive formation.  Estimates for proved undeveloped reserves are not attributed to any acreage for which an application of fluid injection or other improved recovery technique is contemplated, unless such techniques have been proven effective by actual tests in the area and in the same reservoir.
Standardized Measure” – The present value of estimated future cash inflows from proved natural gas and oil reserves, less future development and production costs and future income tax expenses, using prices and costs as of the date of estimation without future escalation, without giving effect to hedging activities, non-property related expenses such as general and administrative expenses, debt service and depreciation, depletion and amortization and discounted using an annual discount rate of 10% to reflect timing of future cash flows.

Other Terms:

Farmout” – An agreement under which the owner of a working interest in an oil or natural gas lease typically assigns the working interest or a portion of the working interest to another party who desires to drill on the leased acreage.  Generally, the assignee is required to drill one or more wells in order to earn its interest in the acreage.  The assignor usually retains a royalty or reversionary interest in the lease.  The interest received by an assignee is a "farmin" while the interest transferred by the assignor is a "farmout."

7



Field” – An area consisting of either a single reservoir or multiple reservoirs, all grouped on or related to the same individual geological structural feature and/or stratigraphic condition. 

Play” – An accumulation of oil and/or natural gas resources known to exist, or thought to exist based on geotechnical research, over a large area expanse.

Prospect” – A location where hydrocarbons such as oil and gas are believed to be present in quantities which are economically feasible to produce.

Reservoir” – A porous and permeable underground formation containing a natural accumulation of producible oil and/or natural gas that is confined by impermeable rock or water barriers and is separate from other reservoirs.

Resources” – Quantities of oil and gas estimated to exist in naturally occurring accumulations.  A portion of the resources may be estimated to be recoverable, and another portion may be considered to be unrecoverable.  Resources include both discovered and undiscovered accumulations.

8



Earthstone Energy, Inc.
Form 10-K
March 31, 20102011
Table of Contents

 Part IPage
Item 1410
Item 1A815
Item 1B815
Item 2815
Item 31320
   
 Part II 
Item 51421
Item 61623
Item 71724
Item 7A2330
Item 82431
Item 94452
Item 9A4452
Item 9B4453
   
 Part III 
Item 104654
Item 114654
Item 124654
Item 134654
Item 144654
   
 Part IV 
Item 154755
 4957






 
ITEM 1
DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS


Overview

Earthstone Energy, Inc. was incorporated in Delaware in 1969 as Basic Earth Science Systems, Inc.  We changed our name in 2010 to Earthstone Energy, Inc.  Earthstone Energy, Inc. (“Earthstone” or “the Company” or “we” or “our” or “us”) is ana growth-oriented independent oil and gas exploration and production company primarily engaged in the exploration, development and developmentproduction of oil and natural gas properties.  We have an established production base that generates positive cash flow from operating activities and profits.  Our operating activities are focusedconcentrated in the North Dakota and Montana portions of the Williston basin, the Denver-Julesburg basin of Colorado, the southern portions of Texas, and along the on-shoreonshore portions of the Gulf Coast.Coast, and the Denver-Julesburg basin of Colorado.  As of March 31, 2011, our estimated net proved oil and natural gas reserves were 1,015,000 Bbls of oil and condensate and 735,000 Mcfs of natural gas.

Strategy

Our primary focusobjective is in the Montanato enhance shareholder wealth by increasing our net asset value, net reserves and North Dakota portionscash flow through acquisitions, exploration, development, exploitation, and divestiture of the Williston basin.  Historically,oil and in the future, this oil rich basin has been, and will continue to be, allocated the majority of our capital expenditure budget. We have been involved in the Williston basin since the early 1980’s and only in south Texas does the Company havegas properties following a longer history. As such, we have a significant understanding of, and exposure to, both the geology and operations in the area. However, both the Williston basin and our south Texas waterfloods are primarily oil producing properties. While not our primary focus, efforts in other areas, notably, Colorado and on-shore portions of the Gulf Coast, are undertaken to increase our exposure to natural gas projects.balanced risk strategy.

The threefour key components of our growth strategy are:

  Identification and acquisition of strategic and significant producing properties; strategic and significant in that they are either accretive to our existing production or will provide an increase to the Company’s existing production base.
    
  
Utilization of strategic partners with industry experience in the specific geographic areas for which we desire to expand.
Cost effective implementation of internally and externally generated exploration and development drilling projects.
    
  Boosting cash flows from existing oil and natural gas production through a combination of cost control and the exploitation of behind-pipe potential.

WeOur primary operational focus is in the Montana and North Dakota portions of the Williston basin.  This oil rich basin has been, and will continue to anticipate emphasizingbe, allocated the majority of our capital expenditure budget.  We have been involved in the Williston basin since the early 1980’s and only in south Texas does the Company have a longer history.  Accordingly, we have a significant understanding of, and exposure to, both the local geology and geologic processes.

The Williston basin and our south Texas waterfloods are primarily oil producing properties.  In an effort to expand our reserves and to diversify our portfolio of properties, we have undertaken efforts in other areas, notably, Colorado, Nebraska and onshore portions of the Gulf Coast.  Last year, drilling, particularly non-operated drilling projects, comprised the majority of capital expenditures.  In the coming year we expect this trend to continue despite our continued emphasis on the acquisition of producing properties over drilling in the coming year.properties.  While we will be drillingexpect to drill a considerable number of wells for our size, (primarilythis effort is primarily to protect expiring leases and maintain our interests under existing acreage holdings),holdings.  Historically, we arehave not expecting to acquireplaced emphasis on acquiring new, large, new, non-producing acreage positions inpositions.  In the coming year.  year, as our existing inventory of acreage is developed, we could see the need to shift capital expenditure dollars into undeveloped acreage.

10


We will also be focusing on keeping our operating costs under control, as we expect rig and vendor service costs to reboundcontinue to escalate due to high demand.  Maintaining a low overhead structure is fundamental to our cost containment.  However, over the last year we have expanded and/or restructured our staff; primarily to comply with increased SEC regulation.  Since our fiscal year end, we have added additional operational staff, and expect to continue to do so, as we increase our capacity to drill more wells.  We are using and will continue to use the services of independent consultants and contractors to perform various professional services.  We believe that this use of third-party service providers enhances our ability to contain general and administrative expenses.

We caution that the following expectations may be altered by subsequent events or other, more attractive opportunities that may present themselves in the future.

Over the last two years, improvements in hydraulic stimulation technology have yielded significantly improved production rates in formations whose physical characteristics were once considered uneconomic.  Previously unknown formations, such as the Marcellus, Haynesville, Eagle Ford, Bakken and recently the Niobrara, are now common names in the oil and gas industry.  By virtue of the producing properties Earthstone has in Montana, North Dakota and Colorado, the Company has exposure to both the ongoing development of the Bakken formation in the Williston basin and now exposure to the new Niobrara play in Colorado.
Areas of FocusOn-Going Activities

Williston Basin.Basin.  The Williston basin continues to be our primaryhighest area of focus,activity, both in terms of cash flow from existing properties and future expenditures. Inexpenditures for drilling efforts as well as the coming year, we intend to increase our efforts to acquire properties in the Williston basin while we continue to exploit ongoing drilling prospects. From a drilling perspective, weacquisition of producing properties.  We have several areas within the Williston basin where we expect drilling operations to commence and/or continue during the current fiscal year.in 2011.  These areas are our on-goingthe Banks prospectField in McKenzie County, North Dakota, the Mondak Field in McKenzie County, North Dakota, the Elm Coulee Field in Richland County, Montana, our acreage in the Indian Hill acreage alsoField in McKenzie County and our acreage in Divide County, North Dakota and Sheridan County, Montana.  While not our primary area of focus, we continue to deploy capital in legacy areas beyond the Williston basin to exploit reserve potential on existing properties.

Banks Field — McKenzie County, North Dakota.  Earthstone retains a 6.5% working interest in approximately 13,000 gross (845 net) acres in and around the immediate vicinityBanks field.  Early efforts on this prospect were less than successful.  With improvements in hydraulic stimulation technology, this area is now much more attractive.  In the last year, two companies, Zenergy and SM Energy, have drilled five wells on the prospect.  Two wells are now on production (the Pederson 10-3H and Fossom 15-35H).  At March 31, 2011, three wells (Ceynar 29-32H, A. Johnson 12-1H and Berquist 33-28H) had been drilled, but not yet completed.  In addition, we anticipate Brigham to drill ten wells on this acreage before calendar year end and we have already executed AFEs authorizing the drilling of six of the possibly ten wells.

Mondak Field — McKenzie County, North Dakota.  The Company has an interest in three wells in the Mondak Field.  One of these wells was drilled in the year ended March 31, 2011.  This well, the Mondak Federal 24X-12, is still being completed and not yet on production.  This acreage is currently developed for one well per spacing unit.  However, we anticipate that this acreage will be developed for two wells per spacing unit in the future.

Elm Coulee Field — Richland County, Montana.  The Company has an interest in four horizontal Bakken wells in the Elm Coulee Field and several, legacy, vertical wells that hold Bakken acreage.  Most areas in the Elm Coulee Field contain two wells per spacing unit.  Now that this field is reaching maturity, it is not unreasonable to expect select areas of this field.  To date, eight horizontalfield to be developed with three wells have been drilled; five in which the Company holds an interest.  Both Panther Energy Company, LLC and Zenergy, Inc. have permitted wells on numerousper spacing units which Earthstone, in-part, owns.  While the Company expects future activity inunit.  We believe it is likely that this areawill occur in the upcoming year, we have not received any indication of when either company may commence additional drilling efforts.coming year.

Indian Hill Field — McKenzie County, North Dakota.  The Company holds approximately 960 gross (192 net) acres in the Indian Hill Field.  SeveralWith improving hydraulic stimulation technology, a number of Bakken horizontal wells have been drilled within four miles of this acreage.  With improving hydraulic stimulation technology, Earthstone anticipatesin the area.  We anticipate that this acreage will be evaluatedproposed for horizontal Bakken development in the coming year.

Divide County, North Dakota — Sheridan County, Montana.  Recently, several companies have drilled horizontal Bakken wells in these two counties.  Little is known aboutcounties in the successBakken Shale, resulting in strong production figures.  Also in the third and fourth quarter of these efforts, especially onthis year, we acquired a 26.5% working interest in five producing wells that have used newer hydraulic stimulation technology.  However, leasing and leasehold prices are escalatinga 25% interest in a manner similar to that seen earliershut-in well in areas that are now being aggressively drilled for Bakken production.Sheridan County, Montana.  By virtue of these acquisitions, in addition to the legacy producing properties Earthstone has in these two counties, along with undeveloped leasehold acreage, the Company has approximately 3,800an estimated 15,200 gross (2,400(4,000 net) acres which could be evaluated for horizontal Bakken development in the coming year.years.


11


Other Areas

The following areas are primarily gas productive and provide us exposure to natural gas projects.

Denver-JulesbergDenver-Julesburg Basin — Weld County, Colorado.  AtAs of March 31, 2009, Earthstone2010, we had finished the first and second phase of our project to (1) drill and complete sixteen new down-spaced wells on the Antenna Federal property in Weld County, Colorado.Colorado and (2) to drill six “edge wells” around this property.  All development work on the first phase one and two on this 640 acre section has been finalized.  AtDuring the year ended March 31, 2010,2011, we have begun our second and third phase of this project; to drill the “edge wells” around this section of land and to deepen somerecompleted nine of the existing Codell wells tointo the J-Sand formation.  For the six new “edge wells” the Company will hold a proportionately reduced interest due to having our acreage “pooled” with adjoining acreage.  We expect to have a 1% to 26.25% revenue interest in Codell/Niobrara production from these wells. The working and revenue interest percentage for each individual well is different and is determined by the specific bottom-hole location of each respective well.  On the third phase of this project, ten of the new Codell wells will be recompleted in the J-Sand formation.  The Company expects to have a 13.125% to 52.5% revenue interest in J-Sand production.  These respective interests are also determined by the specific bottom-hole location of each respective well and the spacing unit attributable to that well.  In addition, in any given well, the respective working and revenue interests of the Codell/Niobrara production may be different when compared to the working and revenue J-Sand production.  Kerr-McGee Oil & Gas Onshore, LP is the operator of thethis project.

In the past few months, word of successful horizontal Niobrara wells has created a frenzy of leasing activity in Colorado and Wyoming.  Earthstone has rights to the Niobrara formation in Weld County, Colorado.  Similar to our Codell formation interests, should horizontal Niobrara wells be drilled on this section, the working and revenue interest percentage for each individual well will be based on our proportionate interest in the specific spacing unit designated for that well.Reserves

Onshore Gulf Coast. During the past few years, we participatedyear ended March 31, 2011, our proved reserves in five wells in this area, primarily pursuing “3-D Bright Spots.” We intend to look atBOE and evaluate additional ventures in this area for possible future participation. However,PV-10 increased approximately 17% and 42%, respectively (from March 31, 2010).  Additional information about our involvement in this area will depend on the quality of prospects we review, the operational record of designated operatorsreserves and the risk associated with specific ventures.calculation of reserves may be referenced in Item 2. “Properties.”

Contemplated Activities

We are continually evaluating other drilling and acquisition opportunities for possible participation.  The absence of news and/or press releases should not be interpreted as a lack of development or activity.   Generally, at any one time, we are engaged in various stages of due diligenceevaluation in connection with one or more drilling or acquisition opportunities.  Unless required by applicable law, our policy is generally to not disclose the specifics of any such opportunity until such time as that transaction is finalized and we have entered into a definitive agreement regarding the same and then, only when such transaction is material to our business.  Similarly, we do not speculate on the outcome of such ventures until the drilling, production or other results are available and have been verified by us.

We may alter or vary all or part of these contemplated activities based upon changes in circumstances, including, but not limited to, unforeseen opportunities, inability to negotiate favorable acquisitions, farmouts, joint ventures, or loan terms,divestitures, commodity prices, lack of cash flow, lack of funding and/or other events which we are not able to anticipate.

Segment Information and Major Customers

Industry segment.  We are engaged only in the upstream segment of the oil and gas industry, which comprises exploration, production, operations and development. Wedevelopment for and of crude oil and natural gas.  While we operate a small number of oil wells, we do not own or operate any gas gathering or processing plant facilities nor do we possess sufficient volume on any pipeline to market our product to end users.  All of our operations are conducted in the United States.  Consequently, we presently report under a single industry segment.

Markets.  We are a small company and, as such, have no impact on the market for our goodsproduct and little control over the price received.  Markets for crude oil and natural gas are volatile and are subject to wide fluctuations depending on numerous factors beyond our control, including other sources of production, competitive fuels and proximity and capacity of pipelines or other means of transportation, seasonality, economic conditions, foreign imports, political conditions in other energy producing countries, OPEC market actions, and domestic government regulations and policies.  Substantially all of our natural gas production is sold at prevailing wellhead gas prices, subject to additional charges customary to an area.

The oil and gas business is not generally seasonal in nature, although unusual weather extremes for extended periods may increase or decrease demand for oil and natural gas products temporarily.  Additionally, catastrophic events, such as hurricanes or other supply disruptions, may also temporarily increase the demand for oil and gas supplies.supplies from areas unaffected by supply disruptions.  Such events and their impacts on oil and gas commodity prices may cause fluctuations in quarterly or annual revenue and earnings.  Also, because of the location of many of our properties in Montana and North Dakota, severe weather conditions, especially in the winter months, could have a material adverse effect on our operations and cash flow.

12


Major Customers.  InDuring the year ended March 31, 2010,2011, approximately 43%48% of our oil and natural gas production revenues were received from sales to nine purchasers (compared to 43% to six purchasers.  It is not expected thatpurchasers in the loss of any one of these purchasers would cause a material adverse impact on our operations because alternative markets for our products are readily available.previous fiscal year).  The remaining 57%52% of our revenue was received from non-operated properties where we have no control over the selection ofdirect contact with the purchaser.  On these properties our portion of the product is marketed on our behalf by the 2123 different companies who operate these wells.  These 2123 companies may, unbeknownst to us, market to one or more of the same purchasers thatto whom we use.sell directly.  Therefore, we are unable to ascertain the total extent of combined purchaser concentration.  To the extent of our knowledge, in the event of the bankruptcy of any one of ourthese purchasers, or purchasers on non-operated properties, it has been estimated that the reduction in annual revenue would be less than 10%.  See also Note 1 – “Major CustomersIt is not expected that the loss of any one of these purchasers would cause a material adverse impact on the Company’s results from operations, as alternative markets for oil and Concentrationnatural gas production are readily available.  Should we require a new buyer of Credit Risk”our production, in some circumstances, a change in customers may entail significant transition costs and/or shutting in or curtailing production for weeks or even months during the Notestransition to Consolidated Financial Statements.a new customer.


Competition

The oil and gas industry is a highly competitive and speculative business. We encounter strong competition from major and independent oil companies in all phases of our operations.  In this arena, we must compete with many companies having financial resources and technical staffs significantly larger than our own.  Furthermore, having pursued an acquisition strategy for over a decade, we did not develop an in-house geologic or geophysical infrastructure, as have many of our competitors.  Rather than incur the time and expense to develop in-house capability, we chose to enter joint ventures with other companies having such resources to accelerate our efforts.  Competition is intense with respect to acquisitions and the purchase of large producing properties because ofproperties.  Due to the limited capital resources available to us.  As such,us, we have historically focused on smaller and/or marginal properties with behind-pipe potential in our acquisition efforts.  Ultimately, our future success will depend on our ability to develop or acquire additional reserves at costs that allow us to remain competitive.

Employees

AtAs of March 31, 2010,2011, we had nineeight full-time, two part-time employees and two part-time employees.contractors.  Four of these employees are primarily field laborers and are located at our subsidiary’s (Basic Petroleum Services, Inc.) field office in Bruni, Texas, forty-five miles southeast of Laredo, Texas.  In addition, in other areas, we have sixseven contract field workers on a part-time retainer basis.  We believe our employee and contractor relations are good.

Regulations

General.  Our operations arecompany is affected in varying degrees by federal, state, regional and local laws and regulations, including, but not limited to, laws governing well spacing, air emissions, water discharges, reporting requirements, endangered species, marketing, prices, taxes, allowable rates of production and the plugging and abandonment of wells, the subsequent rehabilitation of the well site locations, occupational health and safety, control of toxic substances, and other matters involving environmental protection.  These laws are continually changing and, in general, are becoming more restrictive.  We have made,expended, and expect to makeexpend in the future, significant expendituresfunds to comply with such laws and regulations.  Changes to current local, state or federal laws and regulations in the jurisdictions where we operate could require additional capital expenditures and result in an increase in our costs.  Although we are unable to predict what additional legislation, if any, might be proposed or enacted, additional regulatory requirements could impact the economics of our projects.

13


Environmental matters.  We are subject to various federal, state, regional and local laws and regulations related to the discharge of materials into, and the protection of, the environment.  These laws and regulations, among other things, may impose a liability on the owner or the lessee for the cost of pollution cleanup resulting from operations, subject the owner or lessee to a liability for pollution damages, require the suspension or cessation of operations in affected areas and impose restrictions on injection into subsurface formations in order to prevent the contamination of ground water.  All but three of the disposal wells that we utilize are owned and operated by third parties whose disposal practices are outside of our control.  With respect to the three disposal wells that we own and operate, we currently use these facilities only for the disposal of produced water from other Company-operated properties.  Although environmental requirements do have a substantial impact upon the energy industry, these requirements do not appear to affect us any differently than other companies in this industry who operate in a given geographic area.  We are not aware of any environmental claims which could have a material impact upon our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.  Such regulations have increased the resources required and costs associated with planning, designing, drilling, operating and both installing and abandoning oil and natural gas wells and facilities.  We maintain insurance coverage that we believe is customary in the industry.

Available Information

We make available on our website, earthstoneenergy.com, under “Investor Relations, SEC Filings,” free of charge, our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file or furnish them to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).

Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, Board of Directors Committee Charters (Audit, Nominating, and Compensation Committees), and Whistleblower Policy are also available on our website under “Investor Relations, Corporate Governance.”

714



ITEM 1A
RISK FACTORS

While we acknowledge that we have certain risk factors, smaller“smaller reporting companiescompanies” are not required to provide information under this Item.  Therefore, the absence of reporting under this Item should not be construed to indicate that we have no risk factors.  Instead, we recognize that we have the same or similar risk factors as other comparable companies within our industry;industry, especially companies with similar market capitalization and/or employee census.


ITEM 1B
UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.


ITEM 2
DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY

Producing Properties: Location and Impact

AtAs of March 31, 2010,2011, we owned a working interest in 10183 gross producing oil wells and 3944 gross producing gas wells in fivesix states: North Dakota, Montana, Colorado, Texas, Louisiana and Wyoming. Virtually all of our property and production are pledged to secure any use of our bank line of credit.  Refer to Credit Line under Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” for further information.

Productive Wells

  Gross Wells (1)  Net Wells (2) 
  Oil  Gas  Oil  Gas 
                 
Colorado     37      7.50 
Louisiana  1   1   0.01   0.10 
Montana  20      9.77    
North Dakota  56      9.64    
Texas  23   1   20.66   0.11 
Wyoming  1      0.47    
                 
Total  101   39   40.55   7.71 

(1)The number of gross wells is the total number of wells in which a working interest is owned.
(2)A net well is deemed to exist when the sum of fractional ownership working interests in gross wells equals one. The number of net wells is the sum of the fractional working interests owned in gross wells expressed as whole numbers and fractions thereof.
  Gross Wells  Net Wells 
  Oil  Gas  Oil  Gas 
                 
Colorado     41      13.66 
Louisiana  2      0.11    
Montana  21      9.12    
North Dakota  31   2   7.80   0.12 
Texas  28   1   24.36   0.13 
Wyoming  1      0.47    
                 
Total  83   44   41.86   13.91 

Production

Specific production data relative to our oil and natural gas producing properties can be found in the Selected Financial Information table in Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”


Reserves

AtAs of March 31, 2010,2011, our estimated proved developed and undeveloped oil and natural gas reserves in barrels of oil equivalent (BOE)(“BOE”) was 970,000,1,137,000, a 22.2%17% increase from the prior year’syear end’s estimated proved developed oil and natural gas reserves of 794,000970,000 BOE.  This increase was primarily caused byreflects the addition of new wells, along with an increase in the 12 month averagelife of the price ofexisting wells due to an increase in oil and natural gas on the first day of each month during fiscal 2010 when compared to the price on  March 31 2009.prices.

Geographically, our reserves are located in three primary areas: the Williston basin in North Dakota and Montana, the Denver-Julesburg (D-J)(“D-J”) basin in Colorado and on-shoreonshore south Texas.  The following table summarizes the estimated proved developed and undeveloped oil and natural gas reserves divided between operated and non-operated properties for these three areas as of March 31, 2010:2011:

Estimated Proved Oil and Gas Reserves by Area
 
  Net Oil  Net Gas  BOE    
  (Bbls)  (Mcf)  (1)  % 
             
Williston Basin            
     Operated  202,000   45,000   210,000   21.6%
     Non-Operated  248,000   152,000   273,000   28.1%
                 
   450,000   197,000   483,000   49.7%
                 
South Texas/Onshore Gulf Coast                
     Operated  312,000   2,000   312,000   32.2%
     Non-Operated     126,000   21,000   2.2%
                 
   312,000   128,000   333,000   34.4%
                 
D-J Basin                
     Operated  16,000   310,000   68,000   7.0%
     Non-Operated  40,000   277,000   86,000   8.9%
                 
   56,000   587,000   154,000   15.9%
                 
Total  818,000   912,000   970,000   100%
(1)Per equivalent barrel (6 Mcf of gas is equivalent to 1 barrel of oil)
  Net Oil  Net Gas       
  (Bbls)  (Mcf)  BOE  % 
             
Williston Basin            
     Operated  176,763   75,763   189,390   16.7%
     Non-Operated  397,698   221,519   434,618   38.2%
   574,461   297,282   624,008   54.9 %
                 
                 
South Texas/Onshore Gulf Coast                
     Operated  388,103      388,103   34.1%
     Non-Operated           %
   388,103      388,103   34.1 %
                 
                 
D-J Basin                
     Operated  16,109   172,353   44,835   4.0%
     Non-Operated  35,891   265,358   80,117   7.0%
   52,000   437,711   124,952   11.0 %
                 
                 
Total  1,014,564   734,993   1,137,063   100.0%

In March 2010, we adopted revised oil and gas reserve estimation and disclosure requirements which conforms the definition of proved reserves within the Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting rules, which were issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) at the end of 2008. The new accounting standard requires that the 12-month average of the first-day-of-the-month price for the preceding year, rather than the year-end price, be used when estimating reserve quantities. Furthermore, it permits the use of reliable technologies to determine proved reserves, if those technologies have been demonstrated to result in reliable conclusions about reserves volumes. Prior-year data are presented in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) oil and gas disclosure requirements effective during those periods.


Preparation of Proved Reserves Estimates

Our policies regarding internal controls over the recording of reserve estimates require reserve estimates to be in compliance with SEC rules, regulations and guidance.  Oil and natural gas reserves have been estimated as of March 31, 20102011, for a significant portion of our properties by the Ryder Scott Company (“Ryder Scott”) of Houston, Texas.  Ryder Scott estimated reserves for properties located in the states of Colorado, Louisiana, Montana, North Dakota and Texas comprising approximately 93%91% and 98%93% of the PV-10 of our oil and gas reserves as of March 31, 20102011 and  March 31, 2009,2010, respectively.  Ryder Scott is an independent petroleum engineering consulting firm that has been providing petroleum consulting services throughout the world for over seventy years.  Ryder Scott is employee owned and maintains offices in Houston, Texas; Denver, Colorado; and Calgary, Alberta, Canada.  Ryder Scott has over eighty engineers and geoscientists on their permanent staff.  The office of Ryder Scott preparesthat prepared our reserve estimate is registered in the state of Texas (License #F-1580).  Ryder Scott prepared our reserves estimates based upon a review of property interests being appraised, historical production, from such properties, average annual costs of operationlease operating expenses and development, commodity pricesprice differentials for production that comply with the new SEC guidelinesour wells.  Additionally, authorizations for expenditure ("AFEs"), geological and geophysical data, and other engineering data/informationdata that complies with SEC guidelines are among that which we provide to them.such engineer for consideration in estimating our underground accumulations of crude oil and natural gas.  This information iswas reviewed by knowledgeable members of our company, includingRay Singleton, our President and Chief Executive Officer, to ensure accuracy and completeness of the data prior to and after submission to Ryder Scott.  The report of Ryder Scott dated May 3, 2010, which contains further discussions of the reserve estimates and evaluations prepared by Ryder Scott as well as the qualifications of Ryder Scott’s technical personnel responsible for overseeing such estimates and evaluations, is attached as Exhibit 99.3 to this report.
We concluded that it was not cost effective to have Ryder Scott prepare reserve estimates for 32 of our 91 properties because of their relatively low values.  Instead, reserves for these properties were prepared by in-house personnel and contributed 7% and 2% of our reserves as of March 31, 2010 and March 31, 2009, respectively.  In-house reserve estimates were prepared by Ray Singleton, President and Chief Executive Officer.  Mr. Singleton received a Bachelor of Science degree in Petroleum Engineering from Texas A&M University.  In his capacity as an engineer, Mr. Singleton prepared reserve and economic estimates during his employment with both Amoco Production Company and Champlin Petroleum.  Mr. Singleton continued providing economic evaluations for approximately 40 different clients through his engineering consulting firm, Singleton & Associates, from 1982 to 1988, and thereafter for Earthstone Energy, Inc. since his employment in 1988.  In addition, Mr. Singleton is currently a member of the Society of Petroleum Engineers.  The report of Ryder Scott dated May 6, 2011, which contains further discussions of the reserve estimates and evaluations prepared by Ryder Scott as well as the qualifications of Ryder Scott’s technical personnel responsible for overseeing such estimates and evaluations, is attached as Exhibit 99.3 to this report.
We concluded that it was not cost effective to have Ryder Scott prepare reserve estimates for 24 of our 127 producing properties because of their relatively low values.  Instead, reserves for these properties were prepared by in-house personnel and contributed 9% and 7% to our reserves as of March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.  Internal reserve estimates were prepared by Ray Singleton, President and Chief Executive Officer, whose qualifications are summarized above.

Technologies Used in Preparation of Proved Reserves Estimates

All of the proved producing reserves attributable to producing wells and/or reservoirs were estimated by performance methods.  These performance methods used are limited to decline curve analysis which utilized extrapolations of historical production data.   All proved undeveloped reserves were estimated by analogy.  This is done by consideration of the assumptions, data, methods and analytical procedures.

Oil and gas reserves and the estimates of the present value of future net revenues were determined based on prices and costs as prescribed by SEC and FASB guidelines.  Reserve calculations involve the estimate of future net recoverable reserves of oil and gas and the timing and amount of future net revenues to be received.  Such estimates are not precise and are based on assumptions regarding a variety of factors, many of which are variable and uncertain.  Proved oil and gas reserves are the estimated quantities of oil and gas that geological and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be recoverable in future years from known reservoirs under existing economic and operating conditions.  Proved developed oil and gas reserves are those expected to be recovered through existing wells with existing equipment and operating methods.  Proved reserves were estimated in accordance with guidelines established by the SEC and FASB, which require that reservereserves estimates be prepared under existing economic and operating conditions with no provision for price and cost escalations except by contractual arrangements.


The following table sets forth certain information regarding estimates of our oil and gas reserves as of March 31, 2010.2011.  All of our reserves are located in the United States.
 
Estimated Proved Developed and Undeveloped Oil and Gas Reserves

  Proved    
  Developed       
  Producing  Non-Producing  Undeveloped  Total Proved (1) 
             
Net Remaining Reserves            
     Oil/Condensate - Bbls  727,000      91,000   818,000 
     Plant Products - Bbls            
     Gas - MCF  912,000         912,000 
  Proved Developed       
  Producing  Non-Producing  Proved Undeveloped  Total Proved 
             
Net Remaining Reserves            
     Oil/Condensate –  Bbls  1,015,000         1,015,000 
     Plant Products –  Bbls            
     Gas – Mcf  735,000         735,000 

(1)Disclosure of probable and possible reserves became optional under SEC guidelines for years ended March 31, 2010, and accordingly, we have elected not to present probable or possible reserves.
The process of estimating oil and gas reserves is complex and involves decisions and assumptions in the evaluation of available geological, geophysical, engineering and economic data.  Therefore, these estimates are inherently imprecise.  Actual future production, oil and gas prices, revenues, taxes, development expenditures, operating expenses and quantities of recoverable oil and gas reserves most likely will vary from those estimated.  Any significant variance could materially affect the estimated quantities and present value of reserves set forth in this Annual Report.Report on Form 10-K.  In addition, we may adjust estimates of proved reserves are subject to revision to reflect production history, results of exploration and development, prevailing oil and gas prices and other factors, many of which are beyond our control.Accordingly, reserve estimates are often different from the quantities of crude oil and natural gas that are ultimately recovered and are highly dependent upon the accuracy of the assumptions upon which they are based.

Additional information pertaining to our proved reserves is set forth under the heading "Unaudited Oil and Gas Reserves Information" in the notes to the consolidated financial statements included later in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
 
Proved Undeveloped Reserves
 
AtAs of March 31, 2010,2011, we had 91,000 barrels ofno proved undeveloped reserves, which will require future capital expenditures of approximately $991,000 to develop. At March 31, 2009 we had one proved undeveloped property. During fiscal 2010 this property was re-classified to the proved and developed category.  Approximately $490,000 was spent in this development effort. None of the proved undeveloped reserves at March 31, 2010 have been on our reserve report for more than five years.reserves.

Oil and Gas Production and Sales Prices
 
Refer to Selected Financial Information in Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” for the table which presents our net oil and gas production, the average sales price per Bbl of oil and per Mcf of gas produced and the average cost of production per BOE of production sold, for the three years ended March 31, 2011 and 2010.


18


Drilling Activities
 
The following table sets forth our gross and net working interests in exploratory and development wells drilled during the three years ended March 31, 2010:2011, 2010, and 2009, respectively:

Exploratory and Developmental Wells Drilled

   2010   2009   2008 
   Gross   Net   Gross   Net   Gross   Net 
Exploratory (1)                        
     Productive                        
        Oil        1   0.01       
        Gas                  
     Dry holes  1   0.55             
                         
Total  1   0.55   1   0.01       
                         
Development (2)                        
     Productive                        
        Oil  5   0.36   3   0.09       
        Gas        9   2.27   7   1.60 
     Dry holes                  
                         
Total  5   0.36   12   2.36   7   1.60 

(1)An exploratory well is a well drilled to find a new field or to find a new reservoir in a field previously found to be productive of oil or gas in another reservoir.

(2)A development well is a well drilled in a proven territory in a field to complete a pattern of production
   2011   2010   2009 
   Gross   Net   Gross   Net   Gross   Net 
Exploratory                        
     Productive                        
        Oil              1   0.01 
        Gas                  
     Dry holes        1   0.55       
                         
Total        1   0.55   1   0.01 
                         
Development                        
     Productive                        
        Oil  20   5.11   5   0.36   3   0.09 
        Gas  2   0.17         9   2.27 
     Dry holes                  
                         
Total  22   5.28   5   0.36   12   2.36 

Leasehold Acreage

We lease the rights to explore for and produce oil and gas from mineral owners.  Leases (quantified in acres) expire after their primary term unless oil or gas production is established.  Prior to establishing production, leases are generally considered undeveloped.  After production is established, leases are considered developed or “held-by-production.”  Our acreage is comprised of developed and undeveloped acreage as follows:
 
Gross and Net Acreage

 Developed Acreage Undeveloped Acreage (1)  Developed Acreage Undeveloped Acreage 
 Gross (2) Net (3) Gross (2) Net (3)  Gross Net Gross Net 
                  
Colorado           640           384  —  —            640           384  —  — 
Louisiana           687             51  —  —            687             51  —  — 
Montana        6,490        3,206        2,761        2,123         7,051        3,131 11,876        3,078 
Nebraska   84,944 18,470 
North Dakota      14,856        2,952      26,506        4,623       7,096        2,714      19,900        3,717 
Texas        3,080        2,486  —  —         3,080        2,486  —  — 
Utah  —  —      35,945           719 
Wyoming         1,555            329              40                1          1,555            329              40                1 
                          
Total       27,308         9,408       65,252         7,466        20,109         9,095       116,760         25,266 
(1)
Undeveloped acreage encompasses leased acres on which wells have not been drilled or completed to a point that would permit the production of economic quantities of oil or natural gas.
(2)
The number of gross acres is the total number of acres in which a working interest is owned.
(3)A net acre is deemed to exist when the sum of fractional ownership working interests in gross acres equals one. The number of net acres is the sum of the fractional working interests owned in gross acres expressed as whole numbers and fractions thereof.

Field Service Equipment

AtAs of March 31, 2010,2011, our remaining active subsidiary, Basic Petroleum Services, Inc. located in Bruni, Texas, owned a trailer house/field office, a shallow pulling rig, a large winch truck, a skid-mounted cementing unit, four pickup trucks and various ancillary service vehicles.  None of the vehicles are encumbered.


19


Office Lease

We currently lease approximately 4,000 square feet of office space in downtown Denver, Colorado from an independent third party for approximately $5,853$6,000 per month plus maintenance fees escalating at a rate of approximately $170 at the end of each year.  The lease term is for a five-year period ending April 30, 2013.  For additional information see Note 76 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.consolidated financial statements.

ITEM 3
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

None.


Part II
ITEM 5
MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY,
RELATED STOCKHOLDERSHAREHOLDER MATTERS
AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Price Range of Common Stock, Number of Holders and Dividend Policy

Effective December 31, 2010, the Board of Directors authorized and effected a 1-for-10 reverse stock split which converted ten (10) shares of the Company’s common stock into one (1) share of common stock.  All following references to the number of common shares, treasury shares, and per share amounts reflect the reverse stock split.

Our common stock is currently quoted on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the ticker symbol “ESTE.”  Prior to January 26, 2011, our stock was traded on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board (“OTCBB”).  The OTCBB is a network of security dealers who buy and sell stock. The dealers are connected by a computer network that provides information on current “bids” and “asks,” as well as volume information. Our shares are quoted on the OTCBB under the symbol “BSIC.”

The closing bid price on NASDAQ of our common stock on June 10, 2011, was $14.14.  The following table sets forth the quarterly high and low sales prices of our common stock as reported on NASDAQ for the period from January 26, 2011 through March 31, 2011:

 High Low 
Fourth Quarter¹25.25  $ 13.56 

¹Our common stock commenced trading on NASDAQ on January 26, 2011.

The following table sets forth the range of high and low bid quotations forof our common stock for each of the periods indicated below as reported by the OTCBB.  These quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.  The closing bid price on June 18, 2010 was $1.30.

 High Low   Year Ended March 31, 
       2011  2010  
Year Ended March 31, 2009     
  High  Low  High  Low  
               
First Quarter $3.04 $1.09  $14.40  $6.00  $9.90  $6.50 
Second Quarter 2.31 1.21   13.00   9.20   9.50   7.30 
Third Quarter 1.30 0.51   24.00   9.00   8.90   6.82 
Fourth Quarter 1.08 0.51 
     
Year Ended March 31, 2010     
First Quarter $0.99 $0.65 
Second Quarter 0.95 0.73 
Third Quarter 0.89 0.68 
Fourth Quarter 0.93 0.70 
Fourth Quarter¹  19.40   13.50   9.30   7.00 

¹Our common stock commenced trading on NASDAQ on January 26, 2011.

As of June 18, 2010,10, 2011, we had approximately 3,9191,964 shareholders of record.  We have never paid a cash dividend on our common stock. Our loan agreement has a covenant prohibiting the payment of dividends to stockholders without our lender’s prior written consent.  Any future dividend on common stock will be at the discretion of the Board of Directors and will be dependent upon the Company’s earnings and financial condition, receipt of our lender’s consent and other factors.  Our Board of Directors presently has no plans to pay any dividends in the foreseeable future.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities

Not applicable.


Securities Authorized For Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

 
The following table contains information with respect to our Director Compensation Plan as of the end of our fiscal year ended March 31, 2010.2011.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

Plan Category
Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights
 
Weighted-average
exercise
price of outstanding options, warrants
and rights
 
Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans
 
       
Equity compensation plans approved by security holdersN/A  N/A
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holdersN/A300,000 
       
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holdersN/A 
      
Total
 
N/A
 
300,00020,716
 

The Board adopted a Director Compensation Plan (the “Plan”("the Plan”), effective April 1, 2007, which provides for a combination of cash and equity incentive compensation to attract and retain qualified and experienced director candidates.  Under the Plan, each independent, non-employee director receives an annual grant of restricted stockshares having a fair market value equal to $36,000 on April 1 of each year.year as further described below.  The number of shares included in each annual grant is determined based upon the average closing price of the ten trading days preceding April 1 of each year. Up

The Plan allows up to 507,27650,728 shares of the Company’s common stock mayto be issued to directors under the Plan, subject to certain restrictions and vesting. vesting, of which 9,270 shares were granted during the year ended March 31, 2011, for a total of 30,012 shares that have been granted as of March 31, 2011.  Accordingly, as of the year ended March 31, 2011, 20,716 shares of common stock remain available for issuance under the Plan.

Grants of shares of restricted stock vest one-third each year over three years.

During the end of our fiscal year ended March 31, 2010, 207,276 shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the Plan had been authorized for issuance. On March 31, 2010, the Plan was amended to authorize an additional 300,000 shares for issuance. As of June 18, 2010, 294,444 shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the Plan had been granted. Accordingly, 212,832 shares of common stock remain available for issuance under the Plan.  In accordance with the terms of the Plan, if a Director’s participation as a member of the Board ceases or is terminated for any reason prior to the date the shares of restricted stock are fully vested, the unvested portion of the restricted stock shall be automatically forfeited and shall revert back to the Company.  The aggregate number of restricted stock awards outstanding and subject to vesting at the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010,2011, for each non-employee director was as follows: Robertson – 76,4848,555 shares; and Rodgers – 76,484. 8,555; and Calerich – 552.

In addition, on April 1, 2011, each directorof the three non-employee directors was granted 43,5841,867 shares of restricted stock on April 1, 2010,2011, subject to vesting and forfeiture.forfeiture, resulting in 15,115 shares of common stock remaining available for issuance under the Plan as of June 10, 2011.  All restricted shares are considered issued and outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock at the grant date and have the same dividend and voting rights as other common stock.


Purchases of Equity Securities
 
The following table summarizes monthly stockshare repurchase activity for the fourth quarter forof the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010:2011:

  
Total Number of Shares Purchased 
(1)
  Average Price Paid Per Share  
Number of Shares Purchased as Part of a Publicly Announced Plan
(1)
  
Maximum Shares that May Yet be Purchased under the Plan
(1)
 
                 
January 1, 2010 - January 31, 2010  9,415  $0.84   9,415   1,207,570 
February 1, 2010 - February 28, 2010  400  $0.80   400   1,207,170 
March 1, 2010 - March 31, 2010  2,800  $0.85   2,800   1,204,370 
                 
Total  12,615       12,615     
  Total Number of Shares Purchased¹  Average Price Paid Per Share  Number of Shares Purchased as Part of a Publicly Announced Plan¹  Maximum Shares that May Yet be Purchased under the Plan¹ 
                 
January 1, 2011 - January 31, 2011  1,020  $15.48   1,020   109,440 
February 1, 2011 - February 28, 2011    $      109,440 
March 1, 2011 - March 31, 2011    $      109,440 
                 
Total  1,020       1,020     

             (1)¹On October 22, 2008, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a stockshare buyback program for the Company to repurchase up to 500,00050,000 shares of its common stock for a period of up to 18 months.  The program does not require the Company to repurchase any specific number of shares, and the Company may terminate the repurchase program at any time.  On November 13, 2009, the boardBoard of directorsDirectors increased the number of shares authorized for repurchase to 1,500,000.150,000.  On February 10, 2010, the boardBoard extended the termination date of the program from April 22, 2010 to October 22, 2011.  During the year ended March 31, 2010, 265,4302011, 10,997 shares were repurchased under the stockshare buyback program and 1,204,370109,440 shares remain available for future repurchase.


ITEM 6
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

SmallerAs a “smaller reporting companiescompany,” we are not required to provide the information required by this Item.information.




ITEM 7
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and related notes and the other information appearing in this report.  As used in this report, unless the context otherwise indicates, references to “we,” “our,” “ours,” and “us” refer to Earthstone Energy, Inc. and its subsidiary collectively.

Liquidity OutlookAs an oil and natural gas producer, our revenue, cash flow from operations, other income and profitability, reserve values, access to capital and future rate of growth are substantially dependent upon the prevailing prices of crude oil and natural gas.  Declines in commodity prices will materially and adversely affect our financial condition, liquidity, ability to obtain financing and operating results.  Lower commodity prices may reduce the amount of crude oil and natural gas that we can produce economically.  Prevailing prices for such commodities are subject to wide fluctuation in response to relatively minor changes in supply and demand and a variety of additional factors beyond our control, such as global, political and economic conditions.  Historically, prices received for crude oil and natural gas production have been volatile and unpredictable, and such volatility is expected to continue.  Most of our production is sold at market prices.  Generally, if the commodity indexes fall, the price that we receive for our production will also decline.  Therefore, the amount of revenue that we realize is to a large extent determined by factors beyond our control.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity OutlookOur primary source of funding is the net cash flow from the sale of our oil and natural gas production.  The profitability and cash flow generated by our operations in any particular accounting period will be directly related to: (a) the volume of oil and gas produced and then sold, (b) the average realized prices for oil and gas sold, and (c) lifting costs.  AssumingAt the current price of oil, prices do not decline significantly from current levels, we believe the cash generated from operations, will provide sufficient working capital foralong with existing cash balances, should enable us to meet our existing and normal recurring obligations as they become due. In addition, as mentioned induring the “Debt” section below, we have an available borrowing capacity of $4,000,000 as of June 18, 2010.

Capital Structurenext year and Liquiditybeyond.

Overviewof our Capital Structure.  We recognize the importance of developing our capital resource base in order to pursue our objectives.  However, subsequent to our last public offering in 1980, debt financing has been the sole source of external funding.  In addition to our routine production-related costs, general and administrative expenses and, when necessary, debt repayment requirements, we require capital to fund our exploratory and development drilling efforts and the acquisition of additional properties as well as any development andthe enhancement of theseheld and newly acquired properties.

We have received numerous inquiries regarding the possibility of funding our efforts through equity contributions or debt instruments.  Given strong cash flows, and the relatively modest nature of our current drilling projects, we have thus far declined these overtures.  Our primary concern in this area is the dilution of our existing shareholders.  However, going forward, given that one of the key components of our growth strategy is to expand our oil and natural gas reserve base through drilling and/or acquisitions, if we were presented with a significant opportunity and available cash and bank debt financing were insufficient, it is possible we would consider alternative forms of additional financing.

Credit LineHedging.  Our current banking relationship, established in March 2002, is with American National Bank (“the Bank”), located in Denver, Colorado. Effective January 3, 2006 we amended the existing loan agreement to increase the line of credit amount from $1,000,000 to $20,000,000 with a concurrent borrowing base increase from $1,000,000 to $4,000,000. Effective December 31, 2008 the loan agreement was amended again to extend the maturity date of the credit facility to December 31, 2010.

Under the credit facility, we must maintain certain financial covenants. Failure to maintain any covenant, after a curative period, creates a default under the loan agreement and requires repayment of the entire outstanding balance. The loan agreement has covenants requiring us to maintain a debt-to-equity ratio of less than one and a current ratio of at least 1:1 inclusive of unused borrowing capacity and exclusive of the current portion of long-term debt. We were in compliance with all covenants at March 31, 2010.

During the years ended March 31, 20102011 and 2009, we utilized none of our credit facility. Our effective annual interest rate is 6.50% or prime plus 0.25%, whichever is greater. On June 18, 2010, we had no outstanding principal balance on the line of credit, with the entire $4,000,000 available for borrowing. If necessary, we may borrow funds to reduce payables, finance re-completion or drilling efforts, fund property acquisitions or pursue other opportunities. See Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a more detailed discussion of our bank credit facility.

Hedging. During 2010 and 2009, we did not participate in any hedging activities, nor did we have any open futures or option contracts.  Additional information concerning our hedging activities appears in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.consolidated financial statements.

Working Capital.  AtAs of March 31, 2010,2011, we had a working capital surplus of $5,062,000$4,930,000 (a current ratio of 3.53:3.96:1) compared to a working capital surplus atas of March 31, 20092010 of $5,045,000$5,062,000 (a current ratio of 4.62:3.53:1).  The increase in current ratio is primarily a result of the timing between payments made for payables, cash received for revenue and joint interest billings and the timing and use of prepaid balances in addition to the use of cash for the acquisition, development and exploration of oil and gas properties.

24



Cash Flow.  As mentioned above, our primary source of funding is the cash flow from our operations. Cash provided by operating activities decreased 7.2%2% from $2,872,000 in 2009$2,666,000 for the year ended March 31, 2010 to $2,666,000 in 2010. $2,624,000 for the year ended March 31, 2011.  This change related primarily to the timing and collection of accounts receivable, the timing and payment of accounts payable and accrued liabilities, and the application of prepaid balances.  

Net cash used in investing activities decreased 62.2%more than doubled from $4,338,000 in 2009the previous year from $1,641,000 for the year ended March 31, 2010 to $1,641,000 in 2010,$3,356,000 for the year ended March 31, 2011, which relates primarily to our drilling and completion activities during the year.  The difference relates primarily to expenditures made during the year ended March 31, 2011, on an acquisition of producing properties, new horizontal Bakken wells in the Williston basin, the recompletion of D-J basin wells in Colorado and on additional acreage.
 
We have not borrowed on our line of credit since June 2006. Cash used in financing activities was $17,000 in 2009 for the purchase of treasury shares net of proceeds from the exercise of the remaining stock options outstanding, whileNet cash used in financing activities was nearly half of that of the pervious year.  During the year ended March 31, 2010, $208,000 in 2010was used to purchase treasury shares, while $122,000 was utilized for treasury share acquisition for the purchase of treasury shares.year ended March 31, 2011.  The Company’s share buyback program was adopted in October 2008 and will terminate in October 2011, if not extended before then.

Capital Expenditures. During 2010 our capital expenditures were primarily focused

The amounts presented herein are presented on properties in the Williston Basin of Montana and North Dakota. On an accrual basis, total capitaland as such may not be consistent with the amounts presented on the consolidated statements of cash flows under investing activities for expenditures during 2010 foron oil and gas property, which are presented on a cash basis.

During the year ended March 31, 2011, we spent $2,729,000 on various projects.  This compares to $2,156,000 for the year ended March 31, 2010.  During the year ended March 31, 2011, capital expenditures were comprised of acquisitions (47%), drilling and equipmentcompletions (46%) and various leasehold interests were $2,156,000. Of these(7%).  Approximately half of capital expenditures $1,887,000 (87.5%) is attributable tooccurred in the Williston Basin forbasin where funds were spent on the purchase of producing wells, new wells drilled within the Bakken development area and additional leasehold acreage.   Approximately 20% of expenditures were spent on drilling completionand recompletion in the D-J basin.  The remainder was spent in other areas on property improvements and leasehold costs of wells in this area.acreage.  These projects were funded entirely with internally generated cash flow. See also the Areas of Focus and Company Developments sections of Part 1 of this report for further discussion related to our exploration and development activities.

We are continually evaluating exploration, development and acquisition opportunitiesAs of March 31, 2011, we have AFEs totaling $588,000 for our share in an effort to grow our oil and gas reserves.completion costs of new wells in which we share a working interest.  At present cash flow levels, and available borrowing capacity, we expect to have sufficient funds available for our share of both the outstanding AFEs and any additional acreage, seismic and/or drilling cost requirements that might arise from theseour existing opportunities.  However, weWe may alter or vary all or part of theseany planned capital expenditures based uponfor reasons including, but not limited to changes in circumstances, unforeseen opportunities, the inability to negotiate favorable acquisition, farmout, or joint venture or divestiture terms, commodity prices, lack of cash flow, and lack of additional funding, if necessary, and/or other events which we are not able to anticipate.funding.

We are continually evaluating drilling and acquisition opportunities for possible participation.  Typically, at any one time, several opportunities are in various stages of evaluation.  Our policy is to not disclose the specifics of a project or prospect, nor to speculate on such ventures, until such time as those various opportunities are finalized and undertaken.  We caution that the absence of news and/or press releases should not be interpreted as a lack of development or activity.

Divestitures/Abandonments.

We sold five wells and plugged twoeight wells during 2010the year ended March 31, 2011.


25


Impact of Inflation and incurred some additional costs pertaining to the abandonment of wells that are in the process of being plugged.Pricing

Impact of Inflation. We deal primarily in USU.S. dollars.  Inflation has not had a material impact on the Company in recent years because of the relatively low rates of inflation in the United States.  However, the oil and natural gas industry can be cyclical and the demand for production places pressure on the economic stability and pricing within the industry.  Typically, as prices for oil and natural gas increase, associated costs rise.  Conversely, cost declines are likely to lag and may not adjust downward in proportion to declining prices.  Changes in prices impact our revenues, estimates of reserves, assessments of any impairment of oil and natural gas properties, as well as values of properties being acquired or sold.  Price changes have the potential to affect our ability to raise capital, borrow money, and retain personnel.  While we do not presently expect business costs to materially rise, higher prices for oil and natural gas could result in increases in the costs of materials, services and personnel.

Other Commitments. We have no obligations to purchase additional, or sell any existing, oil and gas property. We also

Other than the aforementioned outstanding AFEs, we do not have any other commitments beyond our office lease and software maintenance contracts (seecontracts.  See Note 76 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).consolidated financial statements.

1826


Results of Operations

Selected Financial Information

The following table showsprovides selected financial information and averages for each of the three prior years in the period ended March 31.31, 2011 and 2010.  Certain prior year amounts may have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation. 

  Years Ended 
  March 31, 
  2010  2009  2008 
          
Sales volume         
     Oil (barrels)  98,865   92,657   89,400 
     Gas (mcf) 1
  228,575   175,413   108,600 
             
Revenue            
     Oil $6,223,000  $7,406,000  $6,748,000 
     Gas  996,000   1,585,000   667,000 
Total revenue 2
  7,219,000   8,991,000   7,415,000 
             
Total production expense 3
  2,935,000   3,183,000   2,706,000 
             
Gross profit $4,284,000  $5,808,000  $4,709,000 
             
Depletion expense $1,185,000  $1,188,000  $673,000 
             
Average sales price 4
            
     Oil (per barrel) $62.94  $79.93  $75.47 
     Gas (per mcf) $4.36  $9.04  $6.13 
             
Average per BOE            
     Production expense 3,4,5
 $21.43  $26.09  $19.27 
     Gross profit 4,5
 $31.28  $47.61  $43.96 
     Depletion expense 4,5
 $8.65  $9.74  $5.59 
  
Year Ended
March 31,
 
  2011  2010 
       
Revenue        
     Oil $6,933,000  $6,223,000 
     Gas  1,166,000   996,000 
Total revenue2
  8,099,000   7,219,000 
         
Total production expense3
  3,527,000   2,942,000 
         
Gross profit $4,572,000  $4,277,000 
         
Depletion expense $1,131,000  $1,185,000 
         
         
Sales volume      
     Oil (Bbls)  93,613   98,865 
     Gas (Mcf) 1
  172,386   228,575 
         
Average sales price4
        
     Oil (per Bbl) $74.06  $62.94 
     Gas (per Mcf) $6.76  $4.36 
         
Average per BOE        
     Production expense3,4
 $28.83  $21.48 
     Gross profit4
 $37.37  $31.23 
     Depletion expense4
 $9.24  $8.65 

11
Due to the timing and accuracy of sales information received from a third party operator as described in “Volumes and Prices” above, sales volume amounts may not be indicative of actual production or future performance.
 
22
Amount does not include water service and disposal revenue.  For the year ended March 31, 20102011, this revenue amount is net of $50,000$107,000 in waterwell service and water disposal revenue, which would otherwise total $7,269,000$8,206,000 in revenue for the year ended March 31 2010,2011, compared to $95,000 and $32,000$50,000 to total $9,086,000 and $7,447,000$7,269,000 for the same periods in 2009 and 2008 respectively.year ended March 31, 2010.
 
33
Overall lifting cost (oil and gas production expenses and production taxes)
 
44
Averages calculated based upon non-rounded figures
 
5Per equivalent barrel (6 Mcf of gas is equivalent to 1 barrel of oil)


1927


Fiscal 2010The Year Ended March 31, 2011 Compared with Fiscal 2009the Year Ended March 31, 2010

Overview.  Net income for the year ended March 31, 20102011, was $1,028,000$1,602,000 compared to net income of $578,000$1,028,000 for the year ended March 31, 2009,2010, a 77.9%56% increase.  ThisThe increase is more a function of depressed income in 2009 rather than results in 2010.  Net income in 2009 was adversely impactedsales prices, as offset by a sizeable impairment expense due to a significant decline in oilsales volumes and gas prices during the third quarter of 2009.  With rising pricesincrease in 2010, a similar expense was not incurredproduction costs, resulted in the current year.  While oil and gas sales volume increasedincrease in 2010, these increases were partially offset by decreased average commodity prices when compared to 2009.net income.  While overall production expenses decreased duringincreased as compared to these expenses for the year ended March 31, 2010, general and administrative increased.expenses declined when compared to the year ended March 31, 2010.


Revenues.  Oil and natural gas sales revenue decreased $1,772,000 (19.7%increased $880,000 (12%) infor the year ended March 31, 2011, as compared to the year ended March 31, 2010, over 2009 as a result of overall lower averageprimarily due to higher realized oil and gas prices despite increasedper barrel of oil and gas production. Oilequivalent (“BOE”), as offset by reduced sales revenue decreased $1,183,000 (16.0%) and Gas sales revenue decreased $589,000 (37.2%) in 2010 from 2009.volumes.

Volumes and Prices.  On an equivalent barrel basis, sales decreased 11% from 137,000 BOE for the year ended March 31, 2010 to 122,000 BOE for the year ended March 31, 2011.

Oil sales volumes increased 6.7%decreased 5% from 92,657 barrels in 2009 to 98,865 barrels infor the year ended March 31, 2010 to 93,613 barrels for the year ended March 31, 2011, while the average price per barrel decreased 21.2%increased 18% from $79.93$62.94 for the year ended March 31, 2010 to $74.06 for the year ended March 31, 2011.  The decrease in volumes was primarily related to production declines on two wells; the Halvorsen 31X-36 in the Williston basin and the USA 4-36 in the D-J basin.  These two wells, both newly drilled in 2009, contributed high initial production for the year ended March 31, 2009.  As anticipated, during the year ended March 31, 2011, these two wells exhibited steep, but normal initial declines; thereby reducing oil sales by approximately 4,731 barrels from the year ended March 31, 2010.  To a lesser extent, for the reasons detailed in the paragraph below, oil volumes in the D-J basin reported in our Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2010 were not representative of normal oil sales.  Oil sales from these wells were approximately 1,200 barrels higher than actual volumes sold in the period.

Natural gas sales volumes decreased 24% from 228,575 Mcf for the year ended March 31, 2010 to $62.94 in 2010. Gas sales volume increased 30.3% from 175.4 million cubic feet (MMcf) in 2009 to 228.6 MMcf in 2010.  The172,386 Mcf for the year ended March 31, 2011, while the average price per Mcf decreased 51.8%increased 55%, from $9.04 in 2009$4.36 for the year ended March 31, 2010 to $4.36 in 2010. The production increase$6.76 for the year ended March 31, 2011.  This apparent decline in gas insales volume was attributable to the reporting for the year ended March 31, 2010 was primarilya portion of gas volumes for the year ended March 31, 2009 due to adjustments made duringinaccurate estimates at the close of the year toended March 31, 2009.  In March 2010, we received and reported in our revenues, sales volumes, sales prices and severance taxes followingForm 10-K for the receipt of higher production and sales volume information related to the Antenna Federal property in Weld County, Colorado.  Most of the Company’syear ended March 31, 2010, gas sales arethat exceeded our previous accrued estimates of gas sales from periods back to April 2008.  From April 2008 to September 2009, the operator of our non-operated interestD-J basin wells was in the Antenna Federal property in Weld County, Colorado.  During themidst of an accounting system conversion and furnished us with minimal data.  In those prior year, the Company hadperiods, we estimated and accrued gas sales on this property based on the information available at the timetime.  Had accurate information on gas sales been available and the Company’s experiencereported in the area.  During 2010, we received actualthose prior periods, our reported gas sales volumes and related information from the operator, which were significantly higher than the sales volumes and related information previously reported to, and accrued by, the Company in the prior year.  The incorporation of this information resulted in higher sales volumes, sales prices and severance taxesour Form 10-K for the current year.   Dueyear ended March 31, 2010, would have been lower than those reported.  Excluding the volumes reported for the year ended March 31, 2010 that pertained to the adjustments made during 2010, for updated sales volumes and related information received from the operator of the Antenna Federal property, the higherprior periods, gas sales volumes for 2010, are not representative of actual sales volume for this year and should not be used to predict future production or sales volumes.  In addition, production taxes as a percentage of sales, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of sales and any metric whose denominator is related to sales volumes is likely understated. On an equivalent barrel (BOE) basis, sales increased 12.3% from 122,000 BOE in 2009 to 136,961 BOE in 2010.the two most current years were comparable.

Production ExpensesProduction expenses are comprised of the following items:

  
Year Ended
March 31,
 
   2011   2010 
         
Lease operating expenses $1,874,000  $1,680,000 
Workover costs  856,000   452,000 
Production taxes  586,000   498,000 
Transportation and other expenses  211,000   312,000 
         
  $3,527,000  $2,942,000 


28


Oil and natural gas production expense increased $585,000 (20%) for the year ended March 31, 2011, as compared to the year ended March 31, 2010.  The two principal components of oil and gas production expense decreased $102,000 (4.0%) in 2010 over 2009. Oil and gas production expense is comprised of two components:are routine lease operating expenses and workovers.  Routine expenses typically include such items as daily well maintenance, utilities, fuel, water disposal and minor surface equipment repairs.  Workovers primarily include downhole repairs and are generally random in nature.  Although workovers are expected, they can be much more frequent in some wells than others and their associated costs can be significant.  Therefore, workovers account for more dramatic fluctuations in oil and gas production expense from period to period.

Workover expense increased $404,000 (89%) for the year ended March 31, 2011, as compared to the year ended March 31, 2010.  This increase is primarily attributable to operations in the West Texas waterflood fields.  Routine lease operating expense also increased $16,000 (0.8%$194,000 (12%) from $1,969,000 in 2009for the year ended March 31, 2011, as compared to $1,985,000 in 2010, which is relatively comparable. Workover expense decreased $118,000 (20.7%) from $570,000 in 2009 to $452,000 in 2010 related to an overall decrease in workovers of various wells primarily located in the Williston basin of Montana and North Dakota. On an equivalent barrel basis, routine lease operating expense decreased 10.2% from $16.14 per BOE in 2009 to $14.49 in 2010, while workover expense decreased 29.4% from $4.67 in 2009 to $3.30 per BOE inyear ended March 31, 2010.

Production taxes, which are a function of sales revenue, decreased $146,000 (22.7%) in 2010 from 2009.increased $88,000 for the year ended March 31, 2011, as compared to the year ended March 31, 2010.  Production taxes as a percent of oil and natural gas sales revenue decreased from 7.1% in 2009 to 6.9% in 2010.remained steady at 7%.

The increase in the production expenses as described above were offset by the $101,000 (32%) decrease in transportation costs for the year ended March 31, 2011, as compared to the year ended March 31, 2010, as production was lower for the year ended March 31, 2011.  The decline in production resulting in the decrease in transportation costs was nominally offset by such costs increasing for the industry during 2011.
20


The overall lifting cost (oil and natural gas production expense plus production taxes) per BOE was $21.43 inincreased 34% from $21.48 for the year ended March 31, 2010 compared to $26.09 in 2009.$28.83 for the year ended March 31, 2011.  The decreaseincrease primarily related to the decreasethis increase in production taxesworkover costs as described in the preceding paragraph.above.  This lifting cost per equivalent barrel is not indicative of all wells, and certain high cost wells could be shut inshut-in should oil prices drop below certain levels.

DepreciationOther Expenses.
Depletion and depletiondepreciation expense decreased $3,000 (0.2%$56,000 (5%) in 2010 from 2009.  Depreciation and depletion expense per BOE decreased from $10.03 in 2009 to $8.91 in 2010.

Accretion of asset retirement obligation increased $68,000 (69.4%) in 2010 from 2009. This increase is a result of new well additions during the year and revisions to the estimated lives of some of our wells sharing the same leased acreage. Additional information concerning asset retirement obligations and related activity during 2010 can be found in Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Impairment of oil and gas properties occurred during the prior year as a result of the decline in oil and gas prices.  Like a number of companies in our industry, we incurred a charge consistent with the results of our “ceiling test” which places a “ceiling” on our capitalized costs, thereby limiting our pooled capital costs to the aggregate of the present value of future net revenues attributable to proved oil and gas reserves discounted at 10 percent plus the lower of cost or market value of unproved properties less any associated tax effects.  If the full cost pool of capitalized oil and gas property costs exceeds this “ceiling,” we are required to record a write-down to the extent of such excess.  This write-down is a non-cash charge to earnings.  It reduces earnings and impacts shareholders’ equity in the period of occurrence. The write-down may not be reversed in future periods, even though higher oil and gas prices in the future may subsequently and significantly increase reserve estimates in future periods.  Accordingly, during the year ended March 31, 2009, we determined that our capitalized costs exceeded the ceiling test limit and recorded an impairment write-down of $2,694,000, compared to no ceiling test impairment for the year ended March 31, 2010.2011, as compared to the year ended March 31, 2010 due to the reduction in production.  Depletion expense per BOE increased from $8.65 for the year ended March 31, 2010 to $9.24 for the year ended March 31, 2011.

General and administrative (G&A)("G&A") expense increased $432,000 (32.1%decreased $264,000 (15%) in 2010 over 2009.for the year ended March 31, 2011, as compared to the year ended March 31, 2010.  This increasedecrease was primarily due to consultingreductions in professional fees, in connection withwhich included investor relations and SEC reporting requirements,costs, legal fees, accounting fees and related proxy and shareholder expenses and increased executive compensation.  The percentageSarbanes-Oxley expenses.  As a percent of total sales revenue, G&A expense that was billed outdecreased from 24% for the year ended March 31, 2010 to operated properties was 11.7% in 2010 compared to 14.4% in 2009.18% for the year ended March 31, 2011, as a result of greater revenues and cost reductions.  G&A expense per BOE increased 17.6%decreased 5% from $11.04 in 2009$12.99 for the year ended March 31, 2010 to $12.99 in 2010. G&A expense as a percentage of total sales revenue also increased from 14.8% in 2009 to 24.5% in 2010.

Other Income/Expense.  Interest and other income increased from $57,000 in 2009 to $90,000 in 2010 due to increases in miscellaneous items. Interest and other expenses decreased from $34,000 in 2009 to $32,000 in 2010.$12.38 for the year ended March 31, 2011.

Income Taxes.  In 2010,For the year ended March 31, 2011, we recorded income tax expense of $148,000 comprised$206,000. This amount consisted of a current year income tax provisionperiod expense of $172,000,$104,000, and a deferred income tax benefit of $24,000. This compares to a 2009 income tax benefit of $212,000. At March 31, 2009, we had a net deferred tax benefitexpense of $(558,000).$102,000.  Our effective income tax rate increaseddecreased from (56.34)% for 2009 to 12.57% for 2010.the year ended March 31, 2010 to 11.41% for the year ended March 31, 2011.  Our effective income tax rate was lower for 2009the year ended March 31, 2011, primarily due to an increase in deferred tax assets from the amounts originally estimated deductions for statutory depletion and impairment expense.on the prior year tax provision.

21

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

See Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements.

29

Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2008, the SEC decreed modified instructions for reporting oil and gas activities.  The preparationrule, effective and adopted for the Company’s year ended March 31, 2010, changes the oil and natural gas prices used to calculate reserve quantities and the full cost ceiling limitation from the spot price on the last day of financial statementsthe reporting period to the 12 month average prices, calculated as the unweighted arithmetic average price of oil and gas on the first day of each month for each of the 12 months prior to the last day of the reporting period (unless prices are defined by contractual arrangements).  Adoption of this rule impacted depletion expense for the year ended March 31, 2010, as well as the ceiling test calculation for oil and gas properties as of March 31, 2010.  Adoption of this rule for the year ended March 31, 2010 is considered a change in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires us to make estimates and assumptionsprinciple inseparable from a change in accounting estimate.  The Company does not believe that affect the actual amountsprovisions of assets and liabilities at the date ofthis guidance, other than pricing, significantly impacted the financial statements, and it is impracticable to estimate the actual amountseffect of revenues and expenses duringapplying the reporting period. We base these estimatesnew rule on assumptions that we understand are reasonable undernet income or the circumstances. The estimated results that are produced by this effort will differ under different assumptions or conditions.  We understand that these estimates are necessary and that actual results could vary significantly from the estimated amountsamount recorded for depletion for the currentyear ended March 31, 2010.

In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board expanded the required disclosure of fair value measurements, requiring disclosure of the amounts and future periods. We understandreasons for significant transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the following accounting policiesfair value hierarchy, and estimates are necessarydisaggregation in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements:reconciliation for fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs to separately provide information about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements.  Effective for the carrying value of our oil and gas property, the accounting for oil and gas reserves, the estimate of our asset retirement obligations and the estimate of our income tax assets and liabilities.

Oil and Gas Property. We utilize the full cost method of accounting for costs related to our oil and gas property. Capitalized costs included in the full cost pool are depleted on an aggregate basis over the estimated lives of the properties using the units-of-production method. These capitalized costs are subject to a ceiling test that limits such pooled costs to the aggregate of the present value of future net revenues attributable to proved oil and gas reserves discounted at 10 percent plus the lower of cost or market value of unproved properties less any associated tax effects. If the full cost pool of capitalized oil and gas property costs exceeds the ceiling, we will record a ceiling test write-down to the extent of such excess. This write-down is a non-cash charge to earnings. If required, it reduces earnings and impacts shareholders’ equity in the period of occurrence and may result in lower depreciation and depletion in future periods. The write-down cannot be reversed in future periods, even though higher oil and gas prices may subsequently increase the ceiling.

Oil and Gas Reserves. The determination of depreciation and depletion expense as well as ceiling test write-downs related to the recorded value of our oil and gas properties are highly dependent on the estimates of the proved oil and gas reserves attributable to these properties. Oil and gas reserves include proved reserves that represent estimated quantities of crude oil and natural gas which geological and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be recoverable in future years from known reservoirs under existing economic and operating conditions. There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating oil and gas reserves and their values, including many factors beyond our control. Accordingly, reserve estimates are often different from the quantities of oil and gas ultimately recovered and the corresponding lifting costs associated with the recovery of these reserves. Ninety-three percent of our reported oil and gas reserves atCompany’s year ended March 31, 2010, are based on estimates prepared by an independent petroleum engineering firm. The remaining seven percentadditional disclosure is also required about the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value for both recurring and nonrecurring measurements.  Adoption of our oil and gas reserves were prepared in-house. See also Note 12this amendment, which solely amends disclosure requirements, results in no impact to the Consolidated Financial Statements.Company’s financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

Asset Retirement Obligations. WeVarious other accounting pronouncements have significant obligations relatedbeen recently issued, most of which represented technical corrections to the pluggingaccounting literature or were applicable to specific industries, and abandonmentare not expected to have a material effect on our financial position, results of our oil and gas wells, the removal of equipment and facilities and returning the land to its original condition. As we account for asset retirement obligations we are required to estimate the future cost of this obligation, discount this cost to its present value, and record a corresponding asset and liability in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The values ultimately derived are based on many significant estimates, including the ultimate expected cost of the obligation, the expected future date of the requiredoperations, or cash expenditures and inflation rates. The nature of these estimates requires management to make judgments based on historical experience and future expectations related to timing. We review the estimate of our future asset retirement obligations quarterly. These quarterly reviews may require revisions to these estimates based on such things as changes to cost estimates or the timing of future cash outlays. Any such changes that result in upward or downward revisions in the estimated obligation will result in an adjustment to the related capitalized asset and corresponding liability on a prospective basis. See also Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.flows.

22

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no significant off balance sheet transactions, arrangements or obligations.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

There have been several recent accounting pronouncements, but none are expected to have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. For more information, see Note 1 – “Recent Accounting Pronouncements” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

ITEM 7A
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES
ABOUT MARKET RISK

SmallerAs a “smaller reporting companiescompany,” we are not required to provide the information required by this Item.information.



2330



ITEM 8
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Earthstone Energy, Inc.
Table of Contents
Consolidated Financial Statements
and Accompanying Notes
March 31, 20102011 and 20092010

 Page
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm – Ehrhardt Keefe Steiner & Hottman PC2532
Consolidated Balance Sheets26-2733-34
Consolidated Statements of Operations2835
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity2936
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows3037
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements31-4338-51
 

2431


 
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


Board of Directors and Shareholders
Earthstone Energy, Inc.
Denver, Colorado

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Earthstone Energy, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of March 31, 20102011 and 2009,2010, and the related statements of operations, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our auditaudits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.  An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Earthstone Energy, Inc. as of March 31, 20102011 and 2009,2010, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the years then ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, as of March 31, 2010, the Company has changed its method of determining quantities of oil and gas reserves which impacted the amount recorded for depreciation and depletion and the ceiling test calculation for oil and gas properties.property.

/s/   Ehrhardt Keefe Steiner & Hottman PC

Denver, Colorado
June 18, 201015, 2011


2532



Earthstone Energy, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Page 1 of 2

  March 31,  March 31, 
  2011  2010 
       
Assets      
Current assets:      
     Cash and cash equivalents $4,051,000  $4,905,000 
     Accounts receivable:        
          Oil and gas sales  1,674,000   1,021,000 
          Joint interest and other receivables, net of allowance of $93,000 and
               $86,000, respectively
  329,000   401,000 
     Other current assets  539,000   732,000 
         
Total current assets  6,593,000   7,059,000 
         
Oil and gas property, full cost method:        
     Proved property  35,379,000   33,915,000 
     Unproved property  3,112,000   1,555,000 
     Accumulated depletion and impairment  (24,713,000)  (23,582,000)
         
     Net oil and gas property  13,778,000   11,888,000 
         
Support equipment and other non-current assets, net of accumulated
     depreciation of $377,000 and $374,000, respectively
  471,000   451,000 
         
Total non-current assets  14,249,000   12,339,000 
         
Total assets $20,842,000  $19,398,000 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

33


Earthstone Energy, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Page 2 of 2

  March 31,  March 31, 
  2010  2009 
Assets      
Current assets:      
     Cash and cash equivalents $4,905,000  $4,088,000 
     Accounts receivable:        
          Oil and gas sales  1,021,000   1,611,000 
          Joint interest and other receivables, net of $86,000 and $71,000
         in allowance for bad debt, respectively
  401,000   230,000 
     Other current assets  732,000   508,000 
         
Total current assets  7,059,000   6,437,000 
         
Oil and gas property, full cost method:        
     Proved property  33,915,000   32,187,000 
     Unproved property  1,555,000   1,077,000 
     Accumulated depletion and impairment  (23,582,000)  (22,397,000)
         
     Net oil and gas property  11,888,000   10,867,000 
         
Support equipment and other non-current assets, net of $374,000 and $337,000
    in accumulated depreciation, respectively
  451,000   458,000 
         
Total non-current assets  12,339,000   11,325,000 
         
Total assets $19,398,000  $17,762,000 
  March 31,  March 31, 
  2011  2010 
       
Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity      
Current liabilities:      
     Accounts payable $496,000  $161,000 
     Accrued liabilities  1,167,000   1,836,000 
         
Total current liabilities  1,663,000   1,997,000 
         
Long-term liabilities:        
     Deferred tax liability  2,319,000   2,217,000 
     Asset retirement obligation  1,795,000   1,674,000 
         
Total long-term liabilities  4,114,000   3,891,000 
         
Total liabilities  5,777,000   5,888,000 
         
Commitments         
         
Shareholders’ Equity:        
     Preferred shares, $0.001 par value, 600,000 authorized and none issued or
          outstanding
      
     Common shares, $0.001 par value, 6,400,000 shares authorized and
          1,782,000 and 1,773,000 shares issued, respectively
  18,000   18,000 
     Additional paid-in capital  23,020,000   22,945,000 
     Treasury shares, at cost, 76,000 and 65,000 shares, respectively  (373,000)  (251,000)
     Accumulated deficit  (7,600,000)  (9,202,000)
         
Total shareholders’ equity  15,065,000   13,510,000 
         
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity $20,842,000  $19,398,000 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.



Earthstone Energy, Inc.
Consolidated Balance SheetsStatements of Operations

  March 31,  March 31, 
  2010  2009 
Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity      
Current liabilities:      
     Accounts payable $161,000  $64,000 
     Accrued liabilities  1,836,000   1,328,000 
         
Total current liabilities  1,997,000   1,392,000 
         
Long-term liabilities:        
     Deferred tax liability  2,217,000   2,242,000 
     Asset retirement obligation  1,674,000   1,558,000 
         
Total long-term liabilities  3,891,000   3,800,000 
         
Total liabilities  5,888,000   5,192,000 
         
Commitments         
         
Shareholders’ Equity:        
     Preferred stock, $.001 par value, 3,000,000 authorized and none issued or outstanding      
     Common stock, $.001 par value, 32,000,000 shares authorized and 17,704,000 and 17,506,000
   shares issued and outstanding, respectively
  18,000   18,000 
     Additional paid-in capital  22,945,000   22,825,000 
     Treasury stock (646,000 and 380,000 shares respectively) at cost  (251,000)  (43,000)
     Accumulated deficit  (9,202,000)  (10,230,000)
         
Total shareholders’ equity  13,510,000   12,570,000 
         
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity $19,398,000  $17,762,000 
   Year Ended 
   March 31, 
   2011   2010 
         
Revenues:        
     Oil and gas sales $8,099,000  $7,219,000 
     Well service and water disposal revenue  107,000   50,000 
         
Total revenues  8,206,000   7,269,000 
         
Expenses:        
     Oil and gas production  2,941,000   2,444,000 
     Production tax  586,000   498,000 
     Well service and water disposal expenses  11,000   43,000 
     Depletion and depreciation  1,165,000   1,221,000 
     Accretion of asset retirement obligation  166,000   166,000 
     General and administrative  1,515,000   1,779,000 
         
Total expenses  6,384,000   6,151,000 
         
Income from operations  1,822,000   1,118,000 
         
Other income (expense):        
     Interest and other income  12,000   90,000 
     Interest and other expenses  (26,000  (32,000
         
Total other income (expense)  (14,000  58,000 
         
Income before income taxes  1,808,000   1,176,000 
         
Current income tax expense  104,000   172,000 
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)  102,000   (24,000
         
Total income tax expense  206,000   148,000 
         
Net income $1,602,000  $1,028,000 
         
Per share amounts:        
     Basic $0.94  $0.60 
     Diluted $0.94  $0.60 
         
Weighted average common shares outstanding:        
     Basic  1,710,453   1,707,353 
     Diluted  1,710,453   1,707,353 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.




Earthstone Energy, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of OperationsShareholders’ Equity
Years Ended March 31, 2011 and 2010

   Year Ended 
   March 31, 
   2010   2009 
         
Revenues:        
     Oil and gas sales $7,219,000  $8,991,000 
     Well service and water disposal revenue  50,000   95,000 
         
Total revenues  7,269,000   9,086,000 
         
Expenses:        
     Oil and gas production  2,437,000   2,539,000 
     Production tax  498,000   644,000 
     Well servicing expenses  43,000   33,000 
     Depreciation and depletion  1,221,000   1,224,000 
     Accretion of asset retirement obligation  166,000   98,000 
     Asset retirement expense  7,000   164,000 
     Impairment of oil and gas properties     2,694,000 
     General and administrative  1,779,000   1,347,000 
         
Total expenses  6,151,000   8,743,000 
         
Income from operations  1,118,000   343,000 
         
Other Income (Expense):        
     Interest and other income  90,000   57,000 
     Interest and other expenses  (32,000)   (34,000) 
         
Total other income  58,000   23,000 
         
Income before income taxes  1,176,000   366,000 
         
Current income tax expense  172,000   346,000 
Deferred income taxes (benefit)  (24,000)   (558,000) 
         
Total income tax expense (benefit)  148,000   (212,000) 
         
Net income $1,028,000  $578,000 
         
Per share amounts:        
     Basic $0.06  $0.03 
     Diluted $0.06  $0.03 
         
Weighted average common shares outstanding:        
     Basic  17,073,526   17,105,352 
     Diluted  17,073,526   17,105,352 
          Additional                 
  Common shares  paid-in  Treasury shares  Accumulated     
  Shares  Amount  capital  Shares  Amount  deficit  Total 
                             
March 31, 2009    1,753,000  $   18,000  $   22,825,000      (38,000)  $     (43,000)  $   (10,230,000)  $   12,570,000 
                             
Purchase of treasury shares              (27,000)      (208,000)             (208,000
 
 
)
Share based compensation          20,000              120,000                    120,000 
Net income                        1,028,000        1,028,000 
                             
March 31, 2010    1,773,000  $   18,000  $   22,945,000      (65,000) $   (251,000) $     (9,202,000) $   13,510,000 
                             
Purchase of treasury shares  
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
  
(11,000)
   
 
  
(122,000)
   
 
 
   
 
    
   (122,000
 
 
)
Share based compensation  
      
9,000
   
 
   
 
75,000
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
     
75,000
 
Net income                 1,602,000       1,602,000 
                            
March 31, 2011    1,782,000  $   18,000  $23,020,000      (76,000) $   (373,000) $  (7,600,000) $   15,065,000 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


36


Earthstone Energy, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

  Year Ended
  March 31,
  2011  2010
     
Cash flows from operating activities:    
 Net income   $1,602,000    $1,028,000  
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by          
operating activities:         
 Depletion and depreciation   1,165,000    1,221,000  
 Deferred tax expense (benefit)   102,000    (24,000 )
 Accretion of asset retirement obligation   166,000    166,000  
     Payments on asset retirement obligation  (283,000   (134,000)
     Share based compensation  75,000   72,000  
             
Change in:        
     Accounts receivable, net  (581,000   419,000 
     Other current assets  193,000   (224,000 )
     Accounts payable, accrued and other liabilities  185,000   142,000  
         
Net cash provided by operating activities  2,624,000   2,666,000  
         
Cash flows from investing activities:        
     Oil and gas property  (3,302,000)  (1,612,000)
     Support equipment  (54,000  (29,000
         
Net cash used in investing activities  (3,356,000  (1,641,000
         
Cash flows from financing activities:        
     Purchase of treasury shares  (122,000  (208,000
         
Net cash used in financing activities  (122,000)  (208,000
         
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents  (854,000  817,000 
             
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year  4,905,000   4,088,000 
         
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $4,051,000   $4,905,000  
         
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:        
     Cash paid for interest $   $17,000  
     Cash paid for income taxes $204,000   $7,000  
Non-cash:        
    Increase in oil and gas property due to asset retirement
          obligation
 $265,000   $54,000  
    Vested shares issued as compensation $74,000    $48,000  
    Accrued capital expenditures $141,000   $687,000  

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.



Earthstone Energy, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity
Years Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
          Additional                 
  Common stock  paid-in  Treasury stock  Accumulated     
  Shares  Amount  capital  Shares  Amount  deficit  Total 
                             
March 31, 2008     17,466,000  $   17,000  $   22,798,000      (349,000)  $     (23,000)  $   (10,808,000)  $   11,984,000 
                             
     Purchase of treasury shares                (31,000)        (20,000)               (20,000) 
     Shares issued to independent directors            15,000                24,000                      24,000 
     Stock options exercised            25,000        1,000               3,000                        4,000 
     Net income                           578,000           578,000 
                             
March 31, 2009     17,506,000  $   18,000  $   22,825,000      (380,000)  $     (43,000)  $   (10,230,000)  $   12,570,000 
                             
     Purchase of treasury shares              (266,000)      (208,000)             (208,000) 
     Shares issued to independent directors          192,000              120,000                    120,000 
     Shares issued to employees              6,000                  —                        — 
     Net income                        1,028,000        1,028,000 
                             
March 31, 2010     17,704,000  $   18,000  $   22,945,000      (646,000)  $   (251,000)  $     (9,202,000)  $   13,510,000 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.



Earthstone Energy, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

   Year Ended 
   March 31, 
   2010   2009 
         
Cash flows from operating activities:        
     Net income $         1,028,000  $            578,000 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:        
     Depreciation and depletion           1,221,000            1,224,000 
     Deferred tax liability              (24,000)             (558,000) 
     Accretion of asset retirement obligation              166,000                 98,000 
     Share based compensation                72,000                 24,000 
     Impairment of oil and gas properties   ―            2,694,000 
Change in:        
     Accounts receivable, net              419,000             (495,000) 
     Other assets            (224,000)             (287,000) 
     Accounts payable and accrued liabilities                8,000             (406,000) 
         
Net cash provided by operating activities           2,666,000            2,872,000 
         
Cash flows from investing activities:        
     Oil and gas property         (1,612,000)          (4,338,000) 
     Support equipment              (29,000)    ― 
         
Net cash used in investing activities         (1,641,000)          (4,338,000) 
         
Cash flows from financing activities:        
     Proceeds from exercise of common stock options   ―                   3,000 
     Purchase of treasury shares            (208,000)               (20,000) 
         
Net cash used in financing activities            (208,000)               (17,000) 
         
Cash and cash equivalents:        
     Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents              817,000          (1,483,000) 
     Balance, beginning of year           4,088,000            5,571,000 
         
Balance, end of period $         4,905,000  $         4,088,000 
         
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:        
     Cash paid for interest $              17,000  $              10,000 
     Cash paid for income tax $                6,500  $            517,000 
Non-cash:        
    Increase in oil and gas property due to asset retirement obligation $              54,000  $            33,000 
    Vested shares issued as compensation $              48,000  $              24,000 
    Additions to oil and gas also included in accrued liabilities $         687,000  $              43,000 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


Earthstone Energy, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2011

1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Organization and Nature of Operations.  Earthstone Energy, Inc. (“Earthstone” or “the Company” or “we” or “our” or “us”), was originally organized in July 1969 as Basic Earth Science Systems, Inc. Weand changed ourits name in 2010 to Earthstone Energy, Inc.  We areThe Company is principally engaged in the acquisition, exploitation,exploration, development, operation and production of crude oil and natural gas. Our primary areas of operation aregas properties, primarily operating in the Williston basin in North Dakota and Montana, south Texas and the Denver-Julesburg basin in Colorado.

Principles of Consolidation.  The consolidated financial statements include ourthe accounts of Earthstone Energy, Inc. and those of ourits wholly-owned subsidiaries.subsidiary.  All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.  The Company does not have any unconsolidated special purpose entities.

At the directive of the Securities and Exchange Commission to use “plain English” in public filings, the Company will use such terms as “we,” “our,” “us” or “the Company” in place of Earthstone Energy, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary.  When such terms are used in this manner throughout this document they are in reference only to the corporation, Earthstone Energy, Inc. and its subsidiaries, and are not used in reference to the Board of Directors, corporate officers, management, or any individual employee or group of employees.

Basis of Presentation.  The Company prepares its financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("U.S. GAAP").

Oil and Gas Sales.  We derive revenue primarily from the sale of produced natural gas and crude oil.  We report revenueRevenues from production on properties in which the Company shares an economic interest with other owners are recognized on the basis of the Company's interest.  Revenues are reported on a gross basis for the amounts received before taking into account production taxes and transportation costs, which are reported as separate expenses.  Revenue is recorded and receivables are accrued using the sales method, which occurs in the month production is delivered to the purchaser, at which time title changes hands.ownership of the oil is transferred to the purchaser.  Payment is generally received between 30 and 90 days after the date of production.  We make estimatesEstimates of the amount of production delivered to purchasers and the prices we will receive.  We use ourat which it was delivered are necessary at year end.  Management’s knowledge of ourthe Company’s properties, their historical performance, the anticipated effect of weather conditions during the month of production, NYMEX and local spot market prices, and other factors asare the basis for these estimates.  Variances between estimates and the actual amounts received are recorded when payment is received, or when better information is available.

Oil and Gas PropertiesReserves. We followOil and gas reserves represent theoretical, estimated quantities of crude oil and natural gas which geological and engineering data estimate with reasonable certainty to be recoverable in future years from known reservoirs under existing economic and operating conditions.  There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating oil and gas reserves and their values, including many factors beyond the Company’s control.  Accordingly, reserve estimates are different from the future quantities of oil and gas that are ultimately recovered and the corresponding lifting costs associated with the recovery of these reserves.

Oil and Gas Property.  The Company uses the full cost method of accounting for ourcosts related to its oil and gas activity.property.  Accordingly, all costs associated with the acquisition, exploration and development of oil and gas reserves (including the costs of unsuccessful efforts) are capitalized.  These costs include land acquisition costs, geological and geophysical expense, carrying charges on non-producing properties, costs of drilling, and overhead charges directly related to acquisition and exploration activities.  Under the full cost method, no gain or loss is recognized upon the sale or abandonment of oil and gas property unless nonrecognition of such gain or loss would significantly alter the relationship between capitalized costs and proved oil and gas reserves.

38



Capitalized costs are capitalized,subject to a ceiling test, as prescribed by Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) regulations, that limits such pooled costs to the aggregate of the present value of future net cash flows attributable to proved oil and gas reserves, less future cash outflows associated with the exceptionasset retirement obligation that have been accrued plus the lower of cost or estimated fair value of unproved properties whichnot being amortized less any associated tax effects.  Prices are held constant for the productive life of each well.  If the full cost pool of capitalized oil and gas property costs exceeds the ceiling, the excess is reflected as a non-cash charge to earnings.  The write-down is permanent and not reversible in future periods, even though higher oil and gas prices in the future may subsequently and significantly increase the ceiling amount.  As of the balance sheet date, capitalized costs did not exceed the ceiling test limit.

For the years ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, the oil and natural gas prices used to calculate the full cost ceiling limitation are the 12 month average prices, calculated as the unweighted arithmetic average price of oil and gas on the first day of each month for each of the 12 months prior to the last day of the reporting period (unless prices are defined by contractual arrangements) and net cash flows are discounted at 10 percent.

Prior to March 31, 2010, ceiling calculations were based on the spot price on the last day of the reporting period.  This change is a result of SEC requirements for reporting oil and gas activities effective for annual reporting periods ending on or after December 31, 2009.  This rule, titled "Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting" was implemented by the Company effective March 31, 2010.

Adoption of this rule impacted depletion expense for the year ended March 31, 2010, as well as the ceiling test calculation for oil and gas properties as of March 31, 2010.  The rule further impacted the oil and gas reserve quantities that were estimated by the reservoir engineer.  Adoption of this rule for the year ended March 31, 2010 is considered a change in accounting principle inseparable from a change in accounting estimate.  The Company does not believe that provisions of this guidance, other than pricing, significantly impacted the financial statements, and it is impracticable to estimate the effect of applying the new rule on net income or the amount recorded for depletion for the year ended March 31, 2010.

Unproved properties are excluded from the ceiling test.  Instead, these property costs are periodically reviewed for impairment by reviewing the status of the activity on those properties and surrounding properties either held by us or other parties.

Capitalized costs are subject to a ceiling test that limits such pooled costs to the aggregate of the present value of future net revenues attributable to proved oil and gas reserves using the 12 month average price of oil and gas on the first day of each month and costs discounted at 10 percent plus the lower of cost or fair value ofproperty, excluding those pertaining to unproved properties, less any associated tax effects. If the full cost pool of capitalized oil and gas property costs exceeds the ceiling, we will record a ceiling test write-down to the extent of such excess. This write-down is a non-cash charge to earnings. If required, it reduces earnings and impacts shareholders’ equity in the period of occurrence. The write-down may not be reversed in future periods, even though higher oil and gas prices in the future may subsequently and significantly increase reserve estimates in future periods.  While we did not incur a ceiling limitation charge for the year ended March 31, 2010, we incurred a ceiling test limitation charge in the amount of $2,694,000 during the year ended March 31, 2009, representing the excess of capitalized costs over the ceiling, as calculated in accordance with these full cost rules.

All capitalized costs are depleted on a composite units-of-production method based on estimated proved reserves.  For depletion purposes, the volume of reserves attributableand production is converted into a common unit of measure at the energy equivalent conversion rate of six thousand cubic feet of natural gas to one barrel of crude oil.  Investments in unproved properties and major development projects are not amortized until proved reserves associated with the projects can be determined or until impairment occurs.  If the results of an assessment indicate that the properties are impaired, the amount of the impairment is added to the oil and gas properties we own.capitalized costs to be amortized.  Depletion expense per equivalent barrel of production was $9.24 and $8.65 for the years ended March 31, 2011 and $9.742010, respectively.

Oil and Gas Production Costs.  Costs incurred to operate and maintain wells and related equipment and facilities are expensed as incurred.  Production costs (also referred to as lifting costs) include the costs of labor to operate the wells and related equipment and facilities, repairs and maintenance, materials, supplies, and fuel consumed and supplies utilized in operating the wells and related equipment and facilities, property taxes and insurance applicable to proved properties and wells and related equipment and facilities, and severance taxes.

39


Asset Retirement Obligation.  The Company's activities are subject to various laws and regulations, including legal and contractual obligation to plug, reclaim, remediate, or otherwise restore oil and gas property at the time such asset ceases to be productive.  An asset retirement obligation ("ARO") is initially measured at fair value and recorded as a liability with a corresponding asset when incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made.  This is typically when a well is completed or an asset is placed in service.  When the ARO is initially recorded, the Company capitalizes the cost by increasing the carrying value of the full cost pool.  Over time, the liability increases for 2010the change in its present value (and accretion expense is recorded), while the capitalized cost decreases by way of depletion of the full cost pool.  Estimates are reviewed quarterly and 2009, respectively.adjusted in the period in which new information results in a change of estimate.

Income Taxes.  We account for incomeIncome taxes in accordance with FASB issued authoritative guidance which requiresare computed using the use of the “liabilityasset and liability method.  Accordingly, deferred tax assets and liabilities and assets are determined based onrecognized for the temporaryfuture tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement and tax basescarrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities, their respective tax bases as well as the effect of net operating losses, tax credits and tax credit carry-forwards.  Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse.be recovered or settled.  The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in income tax rates is recognized in the results of operations in the period that includes the enactment date.

No significant uncertain tax positions were identified as of any date on or before March 31, 2011.  The Company’s policy is to recognize interest and penalties related to uncertain tax benefits in income tax expense.  As of March 31, 2011, the Company has not recognized any interest or penalties related to uncertain tax benefits.  For further information, see Note 98 below.

31

 
Earnings Per Share.  OurBasic and diluted earnings per share isare computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share reflectsperiod, after giving effect to the potential dilution of securities, if any, that could share in the earnings1-for-10 reverse stock split effective December 31, 2010.  As of the Company and is calculated by dividing net income by the diluted weighted average number of common shares. The diluted weighted average number of common shares is computed using the treasury stock method for common stock that may be issued for outstanding stock options. The following is a reconciliation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the years ended March 31, 2010 and 2009:

   2010   2009 
Numerator:        
     Net income available to common shareholders $1,028,000  $578,000 
         
Denominator:        
     Denominator for basic earnings per share  17,073,526   17,105,352 
Effect of dilutive securities:        
     Stock options      
         
Denominator for diluted earnings per share  17,073,526   17,105,352 

Therebalance sheet date, no dilutive securities were no options issued or outstanding for 2010 or 2009.  See Note 8 below for further discussion of our stock options.outstanding.

Cash and Cash Equivalents.  For purposes of the Consolidated Balance Sheets and Statements of Cash Flows, we consider allAll highly liquid investments with a maturityoriginal maturities of ninety days or less when purchasedare considered to be cash equivalents. The carrying amount of cash equivalents approximates fair value because of the short-term maturity of those instruments.  During the period and at the balance sheet date, balances of cash and cash equivalents exceeded the federally insured limit.

Fair Value ofMeasurements.  Financial Instruments.instruments and nonfinancial assets and liabilities, whether measured on a recurring or non-recurring basis, are recorded at fair value.  A fair value hierarchy, established by the Financial Accounting Standards Board, prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value.  The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements).

The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, trade receivables, trade payables and accrued liabilities.  The carrying valueliabilities, all of cash and cash equivalents, trade receivables, trade payables and accrued liabilitieswhich are considered to be representative of their fair market value, due to the short maturityshort-term and highly liquid nature of these instruments.

As discussed in Note 5, the Company incurred asset retirement obligations of $49,000 and $54,000 during the years ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, the value of which was determined using unobservable pricing inputs (or Level 3 inputs).  The Company uses the income valuation technique to estimate the fair value of the obligation using several assumptions and judgments about the ultimate settlement amounts, inflation factors, credit adjusted discount rates, and timing of settlement.

Hedging Activities.  We had no hedging activities in 2010the years ended March 31, 2011 and 2009.2010.  Hedging strategies, or absence of hedging, may vary or change due to change of circumstances, unforeseen opportunities, inability to fund margin requirements, lending institution requirements and other events which we are not able to anticipate.

40


Support Equipment and Other.  Support equipment (including such items as vehicles, well servicing equipment, and office furniture and equipment and well servicing equipment) is stated at cost.the lower of cost or market.  Depreciation of support equipment and other property is computed using primarily the straight-line method over periods ranging from five to seven years.

Inventory.  Inventory, consisting primarily of tubular goods and oil field equipment to be used in future drilling operations or repair operations, is stated at the lower of cost or market, cost being determined by the FIFO method.  See also Notes 2 and 3 below.

Long-Term AssetsCommitments.  We apply FASB issued authoritative guidanceThe Company is committed to long-lived assetsa total of $281,000 plus maintenance fees for a five-year lease term ending April 30, 2013 on a 4,000 square foot office space located in downtown Denver, Colorado.  The Company does not included in oil and gas properties.  Under the guidance, all long-lived assets are tested for recoverability whenever eventshave any off-balance sheet financing transactions, arrangements or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying value may not be recoverable.  The carrying amount of a long-lived asset is not recoverable if it exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from its use and eventual disposition.  An impairment loss is recognized when the carrying value of a long-lived asset is not recoverable and exceeds its fair value.obligations.

32

Major Customers and ConcentrationOperating Region.  The Company operates exclusively within the United States of Credit Risk.  PurchasersAmerica.  All of the Company's assets are employed in and all of its revenues are derived from the oil and gas industry.  Individual external purchasers of 10% or more of ourthe Company’s oil and gas production revenue received atfor the years ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 and 2009 arewere as follows:

   2010   2009 
         
Valero Energy  16%   17% 
Nexen Marketing USA, Inc.  10%   14% 
Murphy Oil USA, Inc.  8%   25% 
Plains Inc.     14% 
         
 Total  34%   70% 
  2011  2010 
       
Valero Energy Corp. 19%  16% 
Nexen Marketing USA, Inc. 9%  10% 
 Total 28%  26% 

It is not expected thatFor the loss of any one of these purchasers would cause a material adverse impact on our operations because alternative markets for our products are readily available.
In the yearyears ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, approximately 48% and 57%, respectively, of ourEarthstone’s oil and gas revenue was received from non-operated properties where we havethe Company has no control overdirect contact with the selection of theactual purchaser.  On these properties, ourEarthstone’s portion of the product was marketed on our behalf by the 2123 different companies who operate these wells.  These 2123 companies may, unbeknownst to us, market to one or more of the same purchasers thatto whom we use.sell directly.  Therefore, we are unable to ascertain the total extent of combined purchaser concentration.  To the extent of our knowledge, in the event of the bankruptcy of any one of ourthese purchasers, or purchasers on non-operated properties, it has been estimated that the reduction in annual revenue would be less than 10%.  It is not expected that the loss of any one of these purchasers would cause a material adverse impact on the Company’s results from operations, as alternative markets for oil and gas production are readily available.

Stock Option PlanBad Debt Expense.  WeA charge is recognized in general and administrative expenses and an allowance is established against specific receivable balances from joint interest owners in instances where working interest owners dispute amounts billed for their proportionate share in the cost of wells which the Company operates.  As individual disputes are required to recognizeresolved, either the expense is reversed in the period of the resolution or the receivable is written down.

Share Based Compensation.  The Company recognizes all equity-basedequity based compensation including stock option grants, as stock-basedshare based compensation expense, included in our Consolidated Statements of Operationsgeneral and administrative expenses, based on the fair value of the compensation. No options have been granted since July 2003, andcompensation measured at the plan expired in July 2005.  Therefore, we issued no further stock options in either 2010 or 2009.grant date.  The expense is recognized over the vesting period of the grant.  See Note 87 below for further discussion of the Company’s stock options.information.

Use of Estimates.  The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of oil and gas reserves as well as the assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  These estimates and assumptions concern matters that are inherently uncertain.  Estimates and assumptions are revised periodically and the effects of revisions are reflected in the financial statements in the period it is determined to be necessary.  Actual results could differ from those estimates. There are many factors, including global events, which may influence the production, processing, marketing, and pricing of crude oil and natural gas. A reduction in the valuation of oil and gas properties resulting from declining prices or production could adversely impact depletion rates and ceiling test limitations. Estimates of oil and gas reserve quantities provide a basis for calculation of depletion expense as well as the potential for impairment.

41


Reclassifications. Certain prior year amounts were reclassified to conform to current year presentation.  Such reclassifications had no effect on the prior year net income.income, accumulated deficit, net assets or total shareholders' equity.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Codification, “Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles” (“Codification”) which will become the source of authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the SEC under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. On the effective date of this Statement, the Codification will supersede all then-existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards. All other non-grandfathered non-SEC accounting literature not included in the Codification will become non-authoritative.  This Statement is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ended after September 15, 2009.  The adoption of the Codification did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements or results of operations.

33

In June 2009, the FASB issued guidance related to subsequent events which incorporates the guidance contained in the auditing standards literature into authoritative accounting literature. It also requires entities to disclose the date through which they have evaluated subsequent events and whether the date corresponds with the release of their financial statements. In February 2010, the FASB issued an update to this guidance which no longer requires the Company to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated. We adopted this update which had no impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements or results of operations.

On April 29, 2009, the FASB issued guidance related to financial instruments, which requires publicly-traded companies to provide disclosures on the fair value of financial instruments in interim financial statements, and is effective for interim periods ended after June 15, 2009. We have adopted these new provisions, which did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements or results of operations.

On April 1, 2009, the FASB issued guidance related to business combinations, which addresses application issues associated with initial recognition and measurement, subsequent measurement and accounting and disclosure of assets and liabilities arising from contingencies in a business combination, including the treatment of contingent consideration, acquisition costs, research and development assets and restructuring costs. In addition, changes in deferred tax asset valuation allowances and acquired income tax uncertainties in a business combination after the measurement period will impact income taxes. The new guidance is effective for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. We will apply the new provisions to future acquisitions.

In December 2008, the SEC announced final approval of new requirementsdecreed modified instructions for reporting oil and gas reserves. Amongactivities.  The rule, effective and adopted for the Company’s year ended March 31, 2010, changes the oil and natural gas prices used to calculate reserve quantities and the full cost ceiling limitation from the spot price on the last day of the reporting period to the disclosure requirements is a broader definition12 month average prices, calculated as the unweighted arithmetic average price of reserves, which allows reporting of probable and possible reserves, in addition to consideration of new technologies and non-traditional resources. In addition, oil and gas reserves will be reported using an average price based on the first-day-of-the-month price during the prior 12-month period, rather than year-end prices. The new rules are effectivefirst day of each month for years ending on or after December 31, 2009. The adoptioneach of the new rules12 months prior to the last day of the reporting period (unless prices are defined by contractual arrangements).  Adoption of this rule impacted depletion expense for the year ended March 31, 2010, as well as the ceiling test calculation for oil and gas properties as of March 31, 2010.  Adoption of this rule for the year ended March 31, 2010 is considered a change in accounting principle inseparable from a change in accounting estimate.  The Company does not believe that provisions of the newthis guidance, other than pricing, significantly impacted the reserve estimates or financial statements, which also impact the amount recorded for depreciation, depletion and amortization and the ceiling test calculation for oil and gas properties. Under the new guidance, subsequent price increases cannot be considered in the ceiling test calculation. The Company does not believe that it is practicableimpracticable to estimate the effect of applying the new rulesrule on net lossincome or the amountsamount recorded for depreciation, depletion and amortization and ceiling impairment for the year ended March 31, 2010.

In September 2006,January 2010, the FASB issued guidance related toFinancial Accounting Standards Board expanded the required disclosure of fair value measurements, requiring disclosure of the amounts and disclosures, which definesreasons for significant transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value establishes a frameworkhierarchy, and disaggregation in the reconciliation for measuring fair value in accordance with generally accepted accounting principlesmeasurements using significant unobservable inputs to separately provide information about purchases, sales, issuances and expands disclosuressettlements.  Effective for the Company’s year ended March 31, 2010, additional disclosure is also required about the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value for both recurring and nonrecurring measurements.  The new guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. In February 2008,Adoption of this amendment, which solely amends disclosure requirements, results in no impact to the FASB proposed a one year deferralCompany’s financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

Various other accounting pronouncements have been recently issued, most of which represented technical corrections to the implementation for non-financial assetsaccounting literature or were applicable to specific industries, and liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value on a nonrecurring basis (less frequent than annually). On April 1, 2008, we adopted the new guidance with the one-year deferral for non-financial assets and liabilities. The adoption of the new guidance did not expected to have a material impacteffect on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. Beginning April 1, 2009, we have adopted the provisions for non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities that are not required or permitted to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The adoption did not have a material impact on our financial statements.

Subsequent Events
34

For the period ended March 31, 2011, there were no subsequent events to recognize or disclose in the consolidated financial statements which would either impact the results reflected in this report or the Company’s results going forward.

2. Other Current Assets

Other current assets atas of March 31, 20102011 and 20092010 consisted of the following:

  2010  2009   2011   2010 
            
Lease and well equipment inventory $399,000 $170,000  $399,000  $399,000 
Drilling and completion cost prepayments 244,000 149,000  24,000   244,000 
Prepaid insurance premiums 49,000 44,000  16,000   49,000 
Prepaid income taxes 81,000   21,000 
Other current assets  40,000  145,000   19,000   19,000 
             
Total other current assets $732,000 $508,000  $539,000  $732,000 


The lease
42


Lease and well equipment inventory included in Other Current Assetsother current assets represents well-site production equipment owned by us that has been removed from wells that we operate.  This occurs when we plug a well or replace defective, damaged or suspect equipment on a producing well.  In this case, salvaged equipment is valued at prevailing market prices, removed from the full cost pool and made available for sale.  This equipment is carried on the balance sheet at a value not to exceed the original carrying value established at the time it was placed in inventory.  This equipment is intended for resale to third parties at current fair market prices.  Sale of this equipment is expected to occur in less than one year.  This policy does not preclude us from further transferring serviceable equipment to other wells that we operate, on an as-needed basis.

Drilling and completion cost prepayments represent cash expenditures advanced by us to outside operators prior to the commencement of drilling and/or completion operations on a well.  

3. Other Non-Current Assets

Other non-current assets atfor the years ended March 31, 20102011 and 20092010 consisted of the following:

  2010  2009   2011   2010 
            
Support equipment and lease and well equipment inventory $272,000 $261,000  $281,000  $272,000 
Plugging bonds 60,000 60,000  60,000   60,000 
Other non-current assets  119,000  137,000   130,000   119,000 
              
Total support equipment and other non-current assets $451,000 $458,000  $471,000  $451,000 

ThisSupport equipment represents non-oil and gas property (including such items as vehicles, office furniture and equipment and well servicing equipment) and is stated at the lower of cost or market.  Depreciation of support equipment was $34,000 and $36,000 for the years ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, which was computed using primarily the straight-line method over periods ranging from five to seven years.

Non-current lease and well equipment inventory, unlike the equipment inventory in Other Current Assetsother current assets that is held for resale, is intended for use on leases that we operate.  This equipment inventory represents well-site production equipment that we own that has either been purchased or has been removed from wells that we operate.  When placed in inventory, new equipment is valued at cost and salvaged equipment is valued at prevailing market prices.  The inventory is carried at the lower of the original carrying value or fair market value.

Plugging bonds represent Certificates of Deposit furnished by us to third parties who supply plugging bonds to federal and state agencies where we operate wells.  These funds are classified as restricted.


3543


4. Accrued Liabilities

Accrued liabilities for the years ended March 31, 20102011 and 20092010 consisted of the following:

  2010  2009   2011   2010 
            
Revenue and production taxes payable $348,000 $532,000  $340,000  $348,000 
Accrued compensation 172,000 288,000  223,000   172,000 
Accrued operations payable 820,000 225,000  239,000   820,000 
Accrued taxes payable and other 396,000 143,000 
Accrued income taxes payable and other 238,000   396,000 
Short term asset retirement obligation  100,000  140,000   127,000   100,000 
            
Total $1,836,000 $1,328,000 
Total accrued liabilities $1,167,000  $1,836,000 

5. Asset Retirement Obligation

We recognizeFor the fair valuepurpose of an asset retirement obligation indetermining the period in which it is incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. The associated present value of the asset retirement cost is capitalized as partobligation incurred during the year ended March 31, 2011, the Company assumed an inflation rate of the carrying amount,4%, an estimated average asset life of 23.5 years, and is included in the proved oil and gas properties in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. We own oil and gas properties that require expenditures to plug and abandon when reserves in the wells are depleted. These future expenditures are recorded in the period the liability is incurred (at the time the wells are drilled and completed or acquired)a credit adjusted risk free interest rate of 8.4%.

The following table summarizesreconciles the activity related to our estimatevalue of futurethe asset retirement obligationsobligation for the periods presented.  This included a short term obligation of $127,000 and $100,000 as of March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, which was a component of accrued liabilities on the balance sheet:

   2011   2010 
         
Asset retirement obligation, beginning of period $1,774,000  $1,698,000 
     Liabilities settled  (283,000  (134,000
     Liabilities incurred  49,000   54,000 
     Accretion  166,000   166,000 
     Revisions to estimates  216,000   (10,000
         
Asset retirement obligation at, end of period $1,922,000  $1,774,000 
         
Less current portion $(127,000) $(100,000
             
Asset retirement obligation, less current portion 1,795,000   1,674,000 

6. Commitments

Office rent expense was approximately $113,000 and $107,000 for the years ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, and 2009:

   2010   2009 
         
Asset retirement obligation at beginning of period $1,698,000  $2,179,000 
     Liabilities settled during the period  (134,000)   (168,000) 
     New obligations for wells drilled and completed  54,000   33,000 
     Accretion of asset retirement obligation  166,000   98,000 
     Revisions to estimates  (10,000)   (444,000) 
         
Asset retirement obligation at end of period $1,774,000  $1,698,000 
         
     Current liability $100,000  $140,000 
     Long-term liability  1,674,000   1,558,000 
         
Asset retirement obligation at end of each period $1,774,000  $1,698,000 

Asset retirement expense as recorded in the years ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 represents plugging and abandonment costs in excess of the estimated asset retirement obligation recorded. We based our initial estimates on our knowledge and experience plugging wells in earlier years.

36

6. Credit Line

Our current banking relationship, established in March 2002, is with American National Bank (“the Bank”), located in Denver, Colorado. Effective January 3, 2006, we amended the existing loan agreement to increase the line of credit amount from $1,000,000 to $20,000,000 with a concurrent borrowing base increase from $1,000,000 to $4,000,000. Effective December 31, 2008, the loan agreement was amended again to extend the maturity date of the credit agreement from December 31, 2008 to December 31, 2010. The current interest rate is 6.5% or prime plus one-quarter of one percent (0.25%) whichever is greater, and the addition of an unused commitment fee equal to one-half of one percent (0.50%) per annum on the difference between the outstanding balance and the borrowing base amount.

Under the credit facility, we must maintain certain financial covenants. Failure to maintain any covenant, after a curative period, creates a default under the loan agreement and requires repayment of the entire outstanding balance. With the December 31, 2008 amendment, the covenant requiring us to maintain a net worth of at least $1,750,000 was replaced with a covenant requiring us to maintain a debt-to-equity ratio less than one. Another covenant obligates us to maintain a current ratio of at least 1:1 inclusive of unused borrowing capacity and exclusive of the current portion of long-term debt. We were in compliance with all covenants at March 31, 2010.

This credit line is collateralized by a significant portion of our oil and gas properties and production, and as of March 31, 2010, there was no outstanding balance on this line of credit.  If necessary, we may borrow funds to reduce payables, finance re-completion or drilling efforts, fund property acquisitions or pursue other opportunities that might arise.

7. Commitments

Effective March 1, 2008, we relocated to a new 4,000 square foot office space located in downtown Denver, Colorado.  The lease agreement is for a five-year term through April 2013 and currently requires base rent payments of approximately $5,853 per month escalating at a rate of approximately $170 at the end of each year. Office rent expense was approximately $107,000 in 2010respectively (including building maintenance charges), and $87,000 in 2009.  We are.  The Company is committed to a total of $281,000$157,000 for the five-yearremaining term ending April 1, 2013. Prior to expiration of the lease term, we will evaluate the Denver real estate market and the various available options before deciding on where to lease office space after April30, 2013.

8.The Company also has commitments pertaining to software, phone and copy machine maintenance contracts totaling $84,000, $80,000, and $13,000 for the years ending March 31, 2012, 2013, and 2014, respectively.

7. Shareholders’ Equity

Reverse Stock Split.  Effective December 31, 2010, the Board of Directors authorized and effected a 1-for-10 reverse stock split which converted ten (10) shares of the Company’s common stock into one (1) share of common stock.  The Board of Directors also authorized and effected a 1-for-5 reverse stock split for the number of authorized common shares and preferred shares as follows: (a) the reduction of the number of authorized shares of common shares from the then authorized 32,000,000 shares down to 6,400,000 shares, and (b) the reduction of the number of authorized shares of preferred shares from the then authorized 3,000,000 shares down to 600,000 shares.  Both the common and preferred shares maintain a par value of $0.001.  All references to the number of common shares, treasury shares, and per share amounts in the accompanying consolidated financial statements reflect the reverse stock split.

44


Preferred StockShares.  We have 3,000,000The Company has 600,000 shares of authorized preferred stock that can be issuedwith a par value of $0.001 available for issuance in such series and preferences as determined by the Board of Directors.  Since inception, the Company has not issued any preferred shares.

Stock Option PlanCommon Shares.  Effective July 27, 1995, our shareholders approved the 1995 Incentive Stock Option Plan (“the Plan”) authorizing option grants to employees and outside directors to purchase up to 1,000,000The Company has authorized 6,400,000 shares of our common stock.stock with a par value of $0.001.  The Plan was structured as a 10-year plan and, as such, ended on July 26, 2005. During the Plan’s existence, a total of 665,000 options were granted; of this amount, 50,000 options expired unexercised, 590,000 options were exercised at strike prices ranging from $0.0325 to $0.175 per share and the remaining 25,000 options were exercisedissued common stock as of March 31, 2009.2011, was 1,782,000 common shares.

37

A summary of the status of our stock option plan and outstanding options as of March 31, 2010 and 2009, and changes during the years ended on those dates is presented below:

  2010  2009 
     Weighted     Weighted 
     Average     Average 
     Exercise     Exercise 
  Shares  Price  Shares  Price 
                 
Options unexercised, beginning of year    $   25,000  $0.1325 
                 
     Granted            
     Cancelled            
     Exercised        (25,000)  (0.1325)
                 
Options unexercised and exercisable, end of year    $     $ 
Since all options are fully vested, and the plan has expired, we will have no stock-based compensation expense related to stock options in future periods unless a new plan is adopted and additional options are granted.

Director Stock Compensation.Share Based Compensation.  On March 8, 2007, the Board of Directors adopted a Director Compensation Plan.Plan (“the Plan”) allotting up to 50,728 shares of the Company’s common stock to be issued to independent, non-employee directors.  In connection with this plan,the Plan, an annual stock grant equal to $36,000 is awarded to each independent director.  The number of shares included in each grant is calculated based upon the average closing price of the ten trading days preceding each April 1st anniversary date.  Shares are subject to certain restrictions and vesting.  

9. Income TaxDuring the year ended March 31, 2011, 9,270 shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the Plan were authorized for issuance.  Accordingly, as of March 31, 2011, 20,716 shares of common stock remain available for issuance under the Plan.  Grants of shares of restricted stock vest one-third each year over three years.  In accordance with the terms of the Plan, if a director’s participation as a member of the Board ceases or is terminated for any reason prior to the date the shares of restricted stock are fully vested, the unvested portion of the restricted stock shall be automatically forfeited and shall revert back to the Company.  The aggregate number of restricted stock awards outstanding and subject to vesting at March 31, 2011, for each non-employee director was as follows: Robertson – 8,555 shares; Rodgers – 8,555; and Calerich – 552.  In addition, each of the three independent directors was granted 1,867 shares of restricted stock on April 1, 2011, subject to vesting and forfeiture.  All restricted shares are considered issued and outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock at the grant date and have the same dividend and voting rights as other common stock.

OurOn January 4, 2011, the Board of Directors authorized the Company to increase the Board of Directors to four members in accordance with the Bylaws.  On January 6, 2011, Andrew P. Calerich was appointed a seat on the Board of Directors and was granted restricted common stock valued at $9,000, subject to a vesting period similar to other directors, ergo the aforementioned 552 restricted shares.  Consistent with the calculation of shares for the annual grant of stock to directors, the number of restricted shares was determined by the average closing share price for the last ten trading days of the quarter ended December 31, 2010.  This price, adjusted for the reverse stock split, was $16.30.


45


A summary of the status of the Company’s nonvested shares under the Director Compensation Plan as of March 31, 2011 and 2010, and changes during the years ended on those dates is presented below:
  2011  2010 
     Weighted     Weighted 
     Average     Average 
     Grant Date Fair     Grant Date Fair 
  Shares  Value  Shares  Value 
                 
Nonvested shares, beginning of year  15,306  $144,000   10,244  $120,000 
                 
     Granted  9,270   81,000   8,982   72,000 
     Vested  (6,914)  (72,000)  (3,920)  (48,000)
     Forfeited            
                 
Nonvested shares, end of year  17,662  $153,000   15,306  $144,000 

As of March 31, 2011, there was $80,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested share based compensation arrangements granted under the Director Compensation Plan.  That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.02 years.

The Company granted one key employee 624 restricted shares of Company common stock during the year ended March 31, 2010, valued at $5,000.  Such shares vest one-third each year over three years, subject to forfeiture.

Share based compensation expense of $75,000 and $72,000 was recognized during the years ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, for restricted share grants to independent directors.

Treasury Shares.  On October 22, 2008, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a share buyback program for the Company to repurchase up to 50,000 shares of its common stock for a period of up to 18 months.  The program does not require the Company to repurchase any specific number of shares, and the Company may terminate the repurchase program at any time.  On November 13, 2009, the Board of Directors increased the number of shares authorized for repurchase to 150,000.  On February 10, 2010, the Board extended the termination date of the program from April 22, 2010 to October 22, 2011.  During the year ended March 31, 2011, 10,997 shares were repurchased under the share buyback program and 109,440 shares remain available for future repurchase.  No treasury shares have been retired.


46


8. Income Taxes

The provision for income taxes for the years ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 and 2009is comprised of the following:

 2010 2009  2011  2010 
Current:           
Federal $171,000  $305,000  $93,000  $171,000 
State  1,000   41,000   11,000   1,000 
Total current income tax expense  172,000   346,000   104,000   172,000 
            
Deferred:            
Federal  (23,000)  (483,000)  95,000   (23,000)
State  (1,000)  (75,000)  7,000   (1,000)
Total deferred income tax expense (benefit)  (24,000)  (558,000)  102,000   (24,000)
            
Income tax expense (benefit) $148,000  $(212,000)
Income tax expense $206,000  $148,000 
38


A reconciliation between the income tax provision at the statutory rate on income taxes and the income tax provision for the years ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 and 2009 is as follows:
  2010  2009 
         
Federal taxes at statutory rate $400,000  $124,000 
State taxes, net of federal benefit  9,000   (18,000)
Excess percentage depletion  (283,000)  (322,000)
Other adjustments  22,000   4,000 
         
Income tax expense (benefit) $148,000  $(212,000)

  2011  2010 
         
Federal taxes at statutory rate $615,000  $400,000 
State taxes, net of federal benefit  26,000   9,000 
Excess percentage depletion  (270,000)  (283,000)
Adjustments to deferred tax assets related to intangible drilling costs  (148,000)   
Non-deductible permanent items     6,000 
Other adjustments, net  (17,000  16,000 
         
Income tax expense $206,000  $148,000 
Effective tax rate expressed as a percentage of income before income taxes  11%  13%

The componentsoverall effective tax rate expressed as a percentage of book income before income taxes for year ended March 31, 2011, as compared to the netended March 31, 2010, was lower due to the Company having an increase in deferred tax assets from the amounts originally estimated on the prior year tax provision.

Net income tax payments were $204,000 and $7,000 for the years ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.


47


Net deferred tax assets and liabilities for the years ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 and 2009 are as follows:
  2010  2009 
Deferred tax assets:      
Allowance for doubtful accounts $31,000  $26,000 
Asset retirement obligation  647,000   633,000 
Statutory depletion carryforward  1,074,000   858,000 
         
Gross deferred tax assets  1,752,000   1,517,000 
         
Other accruals  47,000   (4,000)
Depreciation, depletion and intangible drilling costs  (4,016,000)  (3,755,000)
         
Gross deferred tax liabilities  (3,969,000)  (3,759,000)
         
Deferred tax assets (liabilities), net $(2,217,000) $(2,242,000)
were comprised of:

We follow authoritative guidance for
  2011  2010 
Deferred tax assets:      
Allowance for doubtful accounts $34,000  $31,000 
Asset retirement obligation  703,000   647,000 
Statutory depletion carry-forward  1,110,000   1,074,000 
         
Gross deferred tax assets  1,847,000   1,752,000 
         
Other accruals  69,000   47,000 
Depletion, depreciation and intangible drilling costs  (4,235,000)  (4,016,000)
         
Gross deferred tax liabilities  (4,166,000)  (3,969,000)
         
Deferred tax assets (liabilities), net $(2,319,000) $(2,217,000)

Projections of future income taxes and their timing require significant estimates with respect to future operating results.  Accordingly, deferred tax assets and liabilities are continually re-evaluated and numerous estimates are revised over time.  As such, deferred taxes may change significantly as more information and data is gathered with respect to such events as changes in commodity prices, their effect on the financial statement recognition, measurementestimate of oil and disclosuregas reserves and the depletion of uncertain tax positions recognized in the financial statements. Tax positions must meet a “more-likely-than-not” recognition threshold before a benefit is recognized in the financial statements.  As of March 31, 2010, the Company has not recorded a liability for uncertain tax positions. these long-lived reserves.

The Company recognizes interest and penalties relatedis subject to uncertain tax positions inU.S. federal income tax expense. No interest and penalties related to uncertainincome tax positions were accrued at March 31, 2010.from multiple state jurisdictions.  The tax years remaining subject to examination by tax authorities are fiscalthe years 2005ended March 31, 2007 through 2009.2010.

39

10.9. Related Party Transactions

It is ourThe Company maintains a policy thatpermitting officers or directors mayto assign to usthe Company or receive assignments from usthe Company in oil and gas prospects, but only on the same terms and conditions as accepted by independent third parties.  It isThis policy also our policy thatallows officers or directors and the Company mayto participate together in oil and gas prospects generated by independent third parties, but only on the same terms and conditions as accepted by non-related third parties.  In 2010, Ray Singleton, Earthstone’s President of the Company,and Chief Executive Officer, participated in the drilling of the Crown 41-31 in Sheridan County, Montana on the same terms and conditions as other third parties.  The well resulted in a dry hole.  During the years ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, and 2009, none of ourno other directorsdirector or officer participated with the Company in any of our oil and gas transactions.transaction.  In prior years, Mr. Singleton has participated with usthe Company in the acquisition of producing properties on the same terms and conditions as the Company and other third parties.  As such, Mr. Singleton paid for his proportionate share of the acquisition costs at the time of the acquisition.  With respect to his working interest in the four producing wells in which he currently has an ownership, atas of March 31, 2011, the Company had an accrued balance due from Mr. Singleton of $11,000 for his share of operating expenses on these wells, which was billed ten days after year end and for which timely payment was subsequently received.  As of March 31, 2010, the Company hadas a balance due to Mr. Singleton for approximately $10,000 compared to a payable balance due from himresult of less than $1,000 at March 31, 2009. This was due to his share of oil and gas revenue exceeding the amount due from him forof his share of operating expenses, from these wells.the Company had a balance of $10,000 due to Mr. Singleton.


11.
48


10. Oil and Gas Property

The aggregate amount of capitalized costs related to oil and gas propertiesproperty and the aggregate amount of related accumulated depreciation and depletion atas of March 31, 20102011 and 20092010 are as follows:
 
  2010  2009   2011   2010 
            
Proved property $33,915,000 $32,187,000  $35,379,000  $33,915,000 
Unproved property  1,555,000  1,077,000   3,112,000   1,555,000 
            
 35,470,000 33,264,000 
Total capitalized oil and gas property 38,491,000   35,470,000 
Accumulated depletion and impairment  (23,582,000)  (22,397,000)   (24,713,000  (23,582,000
            
Net capitalized oil and gas property $11,888,000 $10,867,000  $13,778,000  $11,888,000 

Costs directly associated with the acquisition and evaluation of unproved property are excluded from the full cost pool depreciation, depletion and amortization computation until the properties can be classified as proved. These costs have been incurred over the last five fiscal years and are not yet evaluated as proved.  Upon proving these properties the costs will be reclassified as proved property, or in the event that a decision is made to cease operations on the property without further work estimated to be performed, the costs will be removed from unproved property and included in the full cost pool to be amortized.  Primarily, these costs relate to the following properties:

Williston Basin.  Five new wells in the Williston Basin primarily within McKenzie County, North Dakota represent $763,000 for 49.1% of the total unproved property costs.  These wells will be removed from the unproved property classification upon evaluation.

Banks Field.  The Banks Field represents approximately 20.5% of total unproved property costs, $318,000, associated with a 13,000 gross acre horizontal Bakken play in McKenzie County, North Dakota.

Christmas Meadows.  The Christmas Meadows prospect consists of approximately 25.5% of total unproved property costs, $396,000, related to 40,000+ acres operated by Double Eagle Petroleum Company.

40

The following table shows, by category and dateyear incurred, the oil and gas property costs applicable to unproved property that were excluded from the depreciation andfull cost pool depletion computation atas of March 31, 2010:2011:

Costs Incurred During Exploration  Development  Acquisition  Total Unproved 
Year Ended Costs  Costs  Costs  Property 
                 
March 31, 2010 $1,000  $791,000  $  $792,000 
March 31, 2009  249,000         249,000 
March 31, 2008  29,000         29,000 
March 31, 2007  308,000         308,000 
March 31, 2006  134,000   39,000      173,000 
March 31, 2005  4,000         4,000 
                 
Total $725,000  $830,000  $  $1,555,000 
Costs Incurred During Exploration  Development  Acquisition  Total Unproved 
Year Ended Costs  Costs  Costs  Property 
                 
March 31, 2011 $  $1,216,000  $756,000  $1,972,000 
March 31, 2010  1,000   361,000   73,000   435,000 
Prior Years        705,000   705,000 
                 
Total $1,000  $1,577,000  $1,534,000  $3,112,000 

Costs incurred in oil and gas property development, exploration and acquisition activities during the years ended March 31, 20102011 and 20092010 are summarized as follows:

  2010  2009   2011   2010 
            
Development costs $1,536,000 $2,177,000  $1,454,000  $1,223,000 
Exploration costs 620,000      620,000 
Acquisitions:            
Proved    519,000    
Unproved       756,000   313,000 
            
Total $2,156,000 $2,177,000 
Total costs of development, exploration and acquisition activities $2,729,000  $2,156,000 

12.11. Unaudited Oil and Gas Reserves Information

AtAs of March 31, 2011 and 2010, 91% and 2009, 93% and 98%, respectively, of the estimated oil and gas reserves presented herein were derived from reports prepared by independent petroleum engineering firm Ryder Scott Company.  The remaining 7%9% and 2%7% of the reserve estimates, respectively, were prepared internally by ourthe Company’s management. There are many inherent uncertainties in estimating proved reserve quantities and in projecting future production rates and the timing of development expenditures. Accordingly, these estimates are likely to change as future information becomes available, and these changes could be material.

Proved oil and gas reserves are the estimated quantities of crude oil, condensate, natural gas and natural gas liquids which geological and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be recoverable in future years from known reservoirs under existing economic and operating conditions. Proved developed reserves are reserves expected to be recovered through existing wells with existing equipment and operating methods.  Proved undeveloped reserves are reserves expected to be recovered through wells yet to be completed.

4149


Analysis of Changes in Proved Reserves.  Estimated quantities of proved developed reserves (all of which are located within the United States), as well as the changes in proved developed reserves during the periods indicated, are presented in the following tables:

Proved Reserves

 March 31, 2010 March 31, 2009 March 31, 2008  March 31, 2011  March 31, 2010  March 31, 2009 
 
Oil
(Bbls)
 
Gas
(Mcf)
 
Oil
(Bbls)
 
Gas
 (Mcf)
 
Oil
(Bbls)
 
Gas
(Mcf)
  
Oil
(Bbls)
  
Gas
(Mcf)
  
Oil
(Bbls)
  
Gas
 (Mcf)
  
Oil
(Bbls)
  
Gas
(Mcf)
 
Proved reserves:                                    
Balance, beginning of year  638,000  936,000  1,074,000  1,120,000  995,000  1,138,000  818,000   912,000   638,000   936,000   1,074,000   1,120,000 
Revisions of previous estimates (1) 275,000 195,000 (429,000) (262,000) 112,000 (113,000) 
Extensions and discoveries (2) 4,000 10,000 86,000 253,000 19,000 203,000 
Sales of reserves in place       
Revisions of previous
estimates¹
 
 
167,000
   
 
(106,000
 
  
 
275,000
   
 
195,000
   
 
(429,000
 
  
 
(262,000
 
)
Extensions and discoveries² 62,000   39,000   4,000   10,000   86,000   253,000 
Improved recovery     15,000 1,000  6,000   61,000             
Purchase of reserves     22,000   55,000   1,000             
Production (3)  (99,000)  (229,000)  (93,000)  (175,000)  (89,000)  (109,000) 
Production³  (93,000  (172,000  (99,000)  (229,000  (93,000  (175,000
                                    
Balance, end of year  818,000  912,000  638,000  936,000  1,074,000  1,120,000   1,015,000   735,000   818,000   912,000   638,000   936,000 
                                    
Proved developed reserves:                                    
Balance, beginning of year            587,000  907,000  1,074,000  1,120,000  995,000  1,138,000      727,000   912,000   587,000   907,000   1,074,000   1,120,000 
                                    
Balance, end of year  727,000  912,000  587,000  907,000  1,074,000  1,120,000   1,015,000   735,000   727,000   912,000   587,000   907,000 
                                    
Proved undeveloped reserves:                                    
Balance, beginning of year  51,000   29,000   —   —   —   —    91,000      51,000   29,000       
                                    
Balance, end of year  91,000  —   51,000   29,000   —   —          91,000      51,000   29,000 

 (1)¹  Revisions of Previous Estimates – Overall our properties experienced an increase in estimated economic life due toEstimates reflect steady increases in oil and gas prices during the year ended March 31, 2010.since December 2008, when prices reached a 5-year low.  Changes in performance constitute less than 10% of the total amount of revisions of previous estimates.

 (2)²  Extensions and Discoveries – The additionsEleven wells represent extensions and discoveries during the year ended March 31, 2011, in North Dakota (7), Montana (2), Colorado (1) and Texas (1).  Additions during the year ended March 31, 2010, consisted of two2 new wells in Colorado and 1 new well in wells in Weld County, Colorado and one new well in the Dunn County, North Dakota.  Additions during the year ended March 31, 2009, pertained to the 16 wells drilled in Colorado.

 (3)³  Production – This change in reserves is due to volumesVolumes of oil and gas that waswere produced andwere removed from reserves during the year.

The table below sets forth a standardized measure of the estimated discounted future net cash flows attributable to ourthe Company’s proved oil and gas reserves. Estimated future cash inflows were computed by applying the 12 month average price of oil and gas on the first day of each month (with consideration of price changes only to the extent provided by contractual arrangements) to the estimated future production of proved oil and gas reserves atas of March 31, 2010,2011 and 2010.  Estimated future cash flows for the year ended March 31, 2009 were based on the spot price on the last day of the reporting period.  This change is a result of the modified instructions from the SEC for reporting oil and 2008.gas activities, as explained in Note 1 above, effective and adopted for the Company’s year ended March 31, 2010.  The future production and development costs represent the estimated future expenditures to be incurred in producing and developing the proved reserves, assuming continuation of existing economic conditions.  Discounting the annual net cash flows at 10% illustrates the impact of timing on these future cash flows.


4250


Standardized Measure of Estimated Discounted Future Net Cash Flows

  
For the Years Ended
March 31,
   
For the Years Ended
March 31,
 
  2010  2009  2008   2011   2010   2009 
                      
Future cash inflows $55,991,000  $31,793,000 $114,296,000  $81,053,000  $55,991,000  $31,793,000 
Future cash outflows:                  
Production cost  (29,065,000)   (17,924,000) (49,599,000)   (41,185,000  (29,065,000)  (17,924,000
Development cost  (991,000)   (490,000)       (991,000)  (490,000)
Future income taxes  (3,361,000)   (2,100,000) (17,826,000)   (6,545,000  (3,361,000)  (2,100,000
                  
Future net cash flows  22,574,000   11,279,000 46,871,000   33,323,000   22,574,000   11,279,000 
Adjustment to discount future annual net cash flows at 10%  (10,060,000)   (4,080,000)  (21,911,000)   (15,826,000  (10,060,000  (4,080,000
                  
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows $12,514,000  $7,199,000 $24,960,000  $17,497,000  $12,514,000  $7,199,000 

The following table summarizes the principal factors comprising the changes in the standardized measure of estimated discounted net cash flows for each of the years ended March 31, 2011, 2010, 2009 and 2008.2009:

Changes in Standardized Measure of Estimated Discounted Net Cash Flows

  
For the Years Ended
March, 31
   
For the Years Ended
March 31,
 
  2010  2009  2008   2011   2010   2009 
                      
Standardized measure, beginning of period $7,199,000  $24,960,000 $14,624,000  $12,514,000  $7,199,000  $24,960,000 
          
Sales of oil and gas, net of production cost  (4,284,000)   (5,808,000) (4,727,000)   (5,204,000  (4,284,000  (5,808,000
Net change in sales prices, net of production cost  6,279,000   (25,977,000) 14,598,000   5,886,000   6,279,000   (25,977,000)
Discoveries, extensions and improved recoveries, net of future development cost  154,000   2,298,000 3,054,000   
 
1,567,000
   
 
154,000
   
 
2,298,000
 
Change in future development costs  467,000          467,000    
Development costs incurred during the period that reduced future development cost                
Sales of reserves in place                
Revisions of quantity estimates  5,280,000   (4,745,000) 2,639,000   3,806,000   5,280,000   (4,745,000)
Accretion of discount  720,000   4,279,000 1,865,000   1,874,000   720,000   4,279,000 
Net change in income taxes  (1,582,000)   16,594,000 (4,221,000)   3,685,000   (1,582,000  16,594,000 
Purchase of reserves      361,000   1,408,000       
Changes in timing of rates of production  (1,719,000)   (4,402,000)  (3,233,000)   (8,039,000  (1,719,000)  (4,402,000
                  
Standardized measure, end of period $12,514,000  $7,199,000 $24,960,000  $17,497,000  $12,514,000  $7,199,000 


4351


ITEM 9
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS
ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.


ITEM 9A
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures
 
As defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act, the phrase “disclosure controls and procedures” means controls and other procedures of an issuer that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.  Disclosure controls and procedures include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Principal AccountingInterim Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

We conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31, 2010.2011.  This evaluation was conducted under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Principal AccountingInterim Chief Financial Officer.  Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Principal AccountingInterim Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of March 31, 2010,2011, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during our last fiscal quarter that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
 
Management's Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

The management of Earthstone Energy, Inc. is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the Company as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act.  This system is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that;that:

(i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company;

(ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and the directorsDirectors of the Company; and

(iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

4452


Because of its inherent limitations, a system of internal control over financial reporting can provide only reasonable assurance and may not prevent or detect misstatements.  Further, because of changes in conditions, effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting may vary over time.

Under the supervision of, and with the participation of our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Principal AccountingInterim Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on the framework and criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.  Based on this evaluation, management concluded that the Company's internal control over financial reporting was effective as of March 31, 2010.2011.

Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide only management’s report in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.  Therefore, this Annual Report on Form 10-K does not include such an attestation.

 
ITEM 9B
OTHER INFORMATION

None.

4553



Part III
 ITEM 10
DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Information relating to this item will be included in an amendment to this report or in the proxy statement for our 20102011 annual stockholders’shareholders’ meeting and is incorporated by reference in this report.


ITEM 11
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Information relating to this item will be included in an amendment to this report or in the proxy statement for our 20102011 annual stockholders’shareholders’ meeting and is incorporated by reference in this report.


ITEM 12
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDERSHAREHOLDER MATTERS
 
 
Information relating to this item will be included in an amendment to this report or in the proxy statement for our 20102011 annual stockholders’shareholders’ meeting and is incorporated by reference in this report.


ITEM 13
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Information relating to this item will be included in an amendment to this report or in the proxy statement for our 20102011 annual stockholders’shareholders’ meeting and is incorporated by reference in this report.


ITEM 14
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

Information relating to this item will be included in an amendment to this report or in the proxy statement for our 20102011 annual stockholders’shareholders’ meeting and is incorporated by reference in this report.



4654



Part IV
ITEM 15
EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a) Documents filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
     
  (1) Financial Statements
    All financial statements as set forth under Item 8 of this report.
     
  (2) Supplementary Financial Statement Schedules
    None.
     
  (3) Exhibits
    See (b) belowbelow.
     
(b) Exhibits
     
  The following exhibits are filed pursuant to Item 601 of Regulation S-K:
   


Exhibit No. Document
3(i)a Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Earthstone Energy, Inc., effective May 12, 1981, as amended by (i) Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation, effective November 20, 1986; (ii) Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation, effective July 1, 1996; and (iii) Certificate of Designations of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock, effective February 5, 2009, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(i) of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2009, filed with the SEC on February 17, 2009.
3(i)b Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation as approved by stockholdersshareholders of the Company at the Company’s 2009 Annual Meeting of StockholdersShareholders and the amendments to the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation previously disclosed in the Company’s proxy statement on Schedule 14A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 5, 2009, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(i) on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 3, 2010.
3(i)cCertificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation dated December 20, 2010 are incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(i) on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 4, 2011.
3(ii)a Bylaws of Earthstone Energy, Inc., dated July 15, 1986, as amended by First Amendment to Bylaws, dated February 4, 2009, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(ii) of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2009, filed with the SEC on February 17, 2009.
3(ii)b Amended and Restated Bylaws reflecting recent changes made to the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation to remove certain outdated and redundant provisions that existed in our prior bylawsBylaws with respect to corporate governance, stockholdershareholder and director meeting procedures, and indemnification procedures.  Changes to the bylawsBylaws include, among other things: (i) amendments to reflect the new name of the Company; (ii) expansion of certain provisions with respect to stockholders’shareholders’ meetings and record dates; (iii) amendments in respect of corporate governance, board committees, and board meetings; (iv) amendments to certain provisions in respect of officers and their duties; (v) amendments to certain provisions in respect of share certificates; and (vi) removal of indemnification provisions are incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(ii) on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 3, 2010.

55



4.1 Rights Agreement, dated February 4, 2009, between Earthstone Energy, Inc. and Corporate Stock Transfer, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of our Current Report on Form 8-K.,8-K, filed with the SEC on February 5, 2009.
4.2Specimen Stock Certificate of Earthstone Energy, Inc., filed herewith.
10.1* Oil and Gas Incentive Compensation Plan, dated April 1, 1980, as amended, incorporated by reference to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 1985, filed with the SEC.
47

(b)Exhibits (continued)
Exhibit No.Document
10.2Loan Agreement, dated March 4, 2002, between The Bank of Cherry Creek and Earthstone, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(i)a of our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002, filed with the SEC on June 28, 2002; as amended by Amended Loan Agreement, dated January 3, 2006, between American National Bank (formerly The Bank of Cherry Creek) and Earthstone, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(i)a of our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006, filed with the SEC on July 14, 2006; and as further amended by Amended Loan Agreement, dated December 31, 2006, between American National Bank and Earthstone, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(i)a of our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009, filed with the SEC on June 29, 2007.
10.3* Performance Bonus Plan, dated effective April 1, 2007, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of our Amended 10-K/A, filed with the SEC on October 9, 2009.
10.4* Director Compensation Plan, dated effective April 1, 2007, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of our Amended 10-K/A, filed with the SEC on October 9, 2009 as amended by board resolution dated March 31, 2010, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2010, filed herewith.with the SEC on June 18, 2010.
10.5* Form of Restricted Stock Agreement pursuant to the Director Compensation Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(ii) of the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2008, filed with the SEC on July 11, 2008.
10.6* Part-Time Employment and Confidentiality Agreement, effective March 31,2008,31, 2008, between Joseph Young and Earthstone, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of our Amended 10-K/A, filed with the SEC on October 9, 2009.
10.7*Financial Consulting Agreement, effective March 16, 2011, between QAS, LLC and Earthstone, filed herewith.
14.1 Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 14.1 of our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2004, filed with the SEC on May 11, 2005.
16.1Letter Regarding Change in Certifying Accountant, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 16.1 of our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on July 21, 2008.
21 Subsidiary List, of Subsidiaries of Earthstone, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 21 of our Amended 10-K/A, filed with the SEC on October 9, 2009.
 Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Ray Singleton, President and Chief Executive Officer).
 Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Joseph Young, Principal Accounting(Jim Poage, Interim Chief Financial Officer).
 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Ray Singleton, President and Chief Executive Officer).
 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Joseph Young, Principal Accounting(Jim Poage, Interim Chief Financial Officer).
99.1
 Nominating Committee Charter, adopted September 28, 2009, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of our Amended 10-K/A, filed with the SEC on October 9, 2009.
99.2 Compensation Committee Charter, adopted September 28, 2009, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 of our Amended 10-K/A, filed with the SEC on October 9, 2009.
 Report of Ryder Scott Company, filed herewith.

 
* Indicates management contracts or compensatory plans or arrangements required to be filed as exhibits pursuant to Item 15 of Form 10-K.


4856



Signatures

In accordance with the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this amendment to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized by the following in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

EARTHSTONE ENERGY, INC.

   
  Date
   
By: /s/ Ray Singleton
 June 18, 201015, 2011
Ray Singleton, President
and Chief Executive Officer
  
   
By: /s/ Joseph YoungJim Poage
 June 18, 201015, 2011
Jim Poage, Interim Chief Financial Officer  
Joseph Young,
Principal Accounting Officer  

In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

   
Name and Capacity Date
   
By: /s/ Ray Singleton
 June 18, 2010
15, 2011
Ray Singleton, Director  
   
By: /s/ Richard K. Rodgers
 June 18, 2010
15, 2011
Richard K. Rodgers, Director and  
Compensation Committee Chairman  
   
By: /s/ Monroe W. Robertson
 June 18, 2010
15, 2011
Monroe W. Robertson, Director and  
Audit Committee Chairman  
By: /s/ Andrew P. CalerichJune 15, 2011
Andrew P. Calerich, Director
 


57