UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549


FORM 10-K


FOR ANNUAL AND TRANSITION REPORTS PURSUANT
TO SECTIONS 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


(Mark One)



ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20172023
OR


TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR
15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


For the transition period from ________ to ________


Commission file number 1-07265


AMBASE CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


DELAWAREDelaware
95-2962743
(State of incorporation)(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)


One South Ocean Boulevard,7857 West Sample Road, Suite 301, Boca Raton, Fl. 33432134, Coral Springs, FL. 33065
(Address of principal executive offices)


Registrant'sRegistrant’s telephone number, including area code: (201) 265-0169


Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:


None


Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:


Title of each class
Common Stock ($0.01 par value)


Rights to Purchase Common Stock


Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes   No
Yes
No



Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
Yes   No
Yes
No



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months, and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes  ☒    No  ☐ 


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files)submit).
Yes  ☒   No  ☐ 


Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to the Form 10-K. ☒


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "accelerated filer"“accelerated filer”, "large“large accelerated filer"filer”, and "smaller“smaller reporting company"company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):


(Check one):Large Accelerated Filer ☐Accelerated Filer ☐Non-Accelerated Filer
Smaller Reporting Company










Emerging Growth Company ☐






Large Accelerated Filer ☐   Accelerated Filer  ☐   Non-Accelerated Filer ☐   Smaller Reporting Company ☒
Emerging Growth Company  ☐


If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.  ☐
Yes ☐   No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 USC. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.  ☐

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements.  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b).  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes   ☐   No  ☒


At February 28, 2018,29, 2024, there were 40,737,751 shares of registrant'sregistrant’s Common Stock outstanding.  At June 30, 2017,2023, the aggregate market value of registrant'sregistrant’s voting securities (consisting of its Common Stock) held by nonaffiliatesnon-affiliates of the registrant, based on the average bid and asking price on such date of the Common Stock of $1.00$0.13 per share was approximately $24$3 million.  The Common Stock constitutes registrant'sthe registrant’s only outstanding class of security.


Portions of the registrant'sregistrant’s definitive Proxy Statement for its 20182024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which Proxy Statement the registrant intends to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission not later than 120 days after the close of its fiscal year, are incorporated by reference with respect to certain information contained therein, in Part III of this Annual Report.


The Exhibit Index is located in Part IV, Item 15, Page 48.page 52.



AmBase Corporation
Annual Report on Form 10-K
December 31, 20172023


TABLE OF CONTENTS


PART I Page
   
Item 1.
1
   
Item 1A.
2
   
Item 1B.
8
   
Item 2.1C.
Properties8
   
Item 3.2.
Legal Proceedings8
   
Item 43.
Mine Safety Disclosures89
   
Item 4.
9
   
PART II  
   
Item 5.
8
Item 6.Selected Financial Data9
   
Item 6.
9
 
Item 7.
Management's9
   
Item 8.
1614
   
Item 9.
4636
   
Item 9A.
4636
   
Item 9B.
37
 
Item 9B.9C.
Other Information4737
   
PART III  
 
Item 10.
37
   
Item 10.11.
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance4739
   
Item 11.Executive Compensation47
Item 12.
4749
   
Item 13.
4850
   
Item 14.
4851
   
PART IV  
 
Item 15.
52
   
Item 15.Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules48
Item 16.
4954
 

PART I


ITEM 1.BUSINESS
ITEM 1.BUSINESS


General

AmBase Corporation (the "Company"“Company” or "AmBase"“AmBase”) is a Delaware corporation that was incorporated in 1975.  AmBase is a holding company.

At December 31, 2017,2023, the Company'sCompany’s assets consisted primarily of cash and cash equivalents, real estate owned and a deferred tax asset. On January 26, 2018, the Company sold its commercial office building in Greenwich, Connecticut, see Part II – Item 8 – Note 3 to the Company's consolidated financial statements for additional information. See Part II – Item 8 – Note 8 to the Company's consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding taxes.equivalents.  The Company is engaged in the management of its assets and liabilities.  The executive office of the Company is located at One South Ocean Boulevard, Suite 301, Boca Raton, Florida 33432.


In June 2013, the Company purchased an equity interest in a real estate development property through a joint venture agreement to purchase and develop real property located at 105 through 111 West 57th Street in New York, New York (the "111“111 West 57th Property"Property”). The Company is engaged in material disputes and litigation with regard to the sponsors111 West 57th Property. Despite ongoing litigation challenging the legitimacy of the joint venture (the "Sponsor")actions taken in connection with the “Strict Foreclosure”, (as defined and a mezzanine lender tofurther discussed herein), the joint venture ("Spruce"). The Company recorded an impairment for the full amount of its equity investment in the 111 West 57th Property in the full year period ended December 31, 2017. See Part II – Item 8 – Note 4 and Note 9Prior to the Company's consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding this impairment charge andStrict Foreclosure, the legal proceedings relating to the Company's investment in the 111 West 57th Property. The carrying value of the Company'sCompany’s equity investment in the 111 West 57th Property represented a substantial portion of the Company'sCompany’s assets and net equity value. The Company has

For additional information concerning the Company’s recording of an appeal pending onimpairment of its equity investment in the 111 West 57th Property in 2017 and the Company’s legal proceedings relating to the 111 West 57th Property, including the Company’s challenge to the strict foreclosure which has not yet been resolved.   Strict Foreclosure, see Part II – Item 8 – Note 3 and Note 8 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.


The executive office of the Company is located at 7857 West Sample Road, Suite 134, Coral Springs, Florida 33065.  The Company had four (4) full-time and two (2) part-time employees at December 31, 2017.2023.


Background


In August 1988, the Company acquired Carteret Bancorp Inc., which through its principal wholly owned subsidiary Carteret Savings Bank, FA, was principally engaged in retail and consumer banking, and mortgage banking including mortgage servicing.  On December 4, 1992, the Office of Thrift Supervision ("OTS") placed Carteret Savings Bank, FA was placed in receivership under the management of the Resolution Trust Corporation ("RTC") and a new institution, Carteret Federal Savings Bank was established to assume the assets and certain liabilities of Carteret Savings Bank, FA.


The Company was a plaintiff in a legal proceeding, commenced in 1993, seeking recovery of damages from the United States Government for the loss of the Company'sCompany’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Carteret Savings Bank, F.A. (the "Supervisory Goodwill"“Supervisory Goodwill” legal proceedings).  Pursuant to a Settlement Agreement between the Company, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation-Receiver ("FDIC-R"(“FDIC-R”) and the Department of Justice ("DOJ"(“DOJ”) on behalf of the United States of America (the "United States"“United States”), (the "Settlement Agreement"“Settlement Agreement”) as approved by the United States Court of Federal Claims (the "Court“Court of Federal Claims"Claims”), in October 2012, the United States paid $180,650,000 directly to AmBase (the "Settlement Amount"“Settlement Amount”). As part ofOn August 6, 2013, Senior Judge Smith issued an opinion which addressed the relief sought by the Company. In summary, the court held that the Settlement Agreement inis a contract and that it entitles the Company's Supervisory Goodwill legal proceedings,Company to receive both “(1) the amount of the tax consequences resulting from taxation of the damages award plus (2) the tax consequences of receiving the first component.”  But the Court of Federal Claims did not award an additional amount for the second component at that time given the remaining uncertainty surrounding the ultimate tax treatment of the settlement proceeds and the gross-up, as well as uncertainty relating to the Company’s future income.  The Court of Federal Claims indicated that either the Company or the government is entitled to a tax gross-up in an amount to be determined ifseek further relief “if, and when, any federal taxes should be imposed on the Settlement Amount. In December 2014, the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") completed their review of the examination of the Company's 2012 Federal Income Tax Return with no change to the tax return as filed.facts justify it.”


STOCKHOLDER INQUIRIESStockholder Inquiries


Stockholder inquiries, including requests for the following: (i) change of address; (ii) replacement of lost stock certificates; (iii) Common Stock name registration changes; (iv) Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q; (v) Annual Reports on Form 10-K; (vi) Current Reports on Form 8-K; (vii) proxy material;materials; and (vii)(viii) information regarding stockholdings, should be directed to:


American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC
6201 15th Avenue
Brooklyn, NY  11219
Attention:  Shareholder Services
(800) 937-5449 or (718) 921-8200 Ext. 6820
 






As theThe Company does not maintain a website, copieswebsite. Copies of Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, Annual Reports on Form 10-K and Proxy Statements can also be obtained directly from the Company free of charge by sendingmailing a request to the Company by mail as follows:


AmBase Corporation
12 Lincoln Blvd., Suite 202
Emerson, NJ  07630
Attn: Shareholder Services
 


The Company is subject to the informational requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"“Exchange Act”). Accordingly, the Company'sCompany’s public reports, including Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, Annual Reports on Form 10-K and Proxy Statements, can be obtained through the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"(“SEC”) EDGAR Database available on the SEC'sSEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Materials filed with the SEC may also be read or copied by visiting the SEC'sSEC’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-800-SEC-0330.


ITEM 1A.RISK FACTORS
ITEM 1A.RISK FACTORS


The Company is subject to various risks, many of which are beyond the Company'sCompany’s control, which could have a negative effect on the Company and its financial condition. As a result of these and other factors, the Company may experience material fluctuations in future operating results on a quarterly or annual basis which could materially and adversely affect the Company'sCompany’s business, financial condition, operating results and stock price. An investment in the Company'sCompany’s stock involves various risks, including those mentioned below and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K (this "Annual Report"“Annual Report”), and those that are detailed from time to time in the Company'sCompany’s other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. You should carefully consider the following risk factors, together with all of the other information included or incorporated by reference in this Annual Report, before you decide whether to purchase the Company'sCompany’s common stock.


Operating Risks

Going Concern


The Company has incurred operating losses and used cash for operating activities for the past several years. In June 2013, the Company purchased an equity interest in a real estate development property through a joint venture agreement to purchase and develop real property located at 105 through 111 West 57th Street in New York, New York (the "111 West 57th Property"). The Company has also made significant investments in the 111 West 57th Street Property in 2013, 2014 and 2015. The Company is engaged in material disputes and litigation with the sponsors of the joint venture (the "Sponsor") and a mezzanine lender to the joint venture ("Spruce"). The Company recorded an impairment of its equity investment in the 111 West 57th Property in the full year period ended December 31, 2017. See Part II – Item 8 – Note 4 and Note 9 to the Company's consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding this impairment charge and the legal proceedings relating to the Company's investment in the 111 West 57th Property. The carrying value of the Company's equity investment in the 111 West 57th Property represented a substantial portion of the Company's assets and net equity value. The Company has an appeal pending on its challenge to the strict foreclosure which has not yet been resolved. The Company has continued to keep operating expenses at a reduced level; however, there can be no assurance that the Company'sCompany’s current level of operating expenses will not increase or that other uses of cash will not be necessary.  The Company believes that based on its current level of operating expenses, its currently availableexisting cash and financial resources, together with the net proceeds from the sale of its commercial office building Greenwich, Connecticut as further discussed in Part II – Item 8 – Note 3 to the Company's consolidated financial statements,cash equivalents may not be sufficient to cover operating cash needs through the twelve month period from the financial statement reporting date. Based on the above factors, management determined there is substantial doubt about the Company'sCompany’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued. The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include adjustments to the carrying value of assets and liabilities, which might be necessary should the Company not continue in operation.


Over the next several months,In order to continue as a going concern, the Company will seekmust take steps to manage its current level of cash and cash equivalents, through various ways, including but not limited to, reducing operating expenses, possible asset sales and/raising additional capital through the sale of equity or debt securities or long term borrowings, which may include additional borrowings from affiliates of the Company, although this cannot be assured. In order to continue on a long-term basis, the Company must raise additional capital through the sale of assets or long term borrowings.reducing operating expenses, and seeking recoveries from various sources. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to sell any of its assetsadequately implement these cash management measures, in whole or attain suchin part or raise capital or obtain financing aton terms acceptable to the Company, if at all.


To provide the necessary cash resources to continue operations and continue the litigation related to the 111 West 57th Property, the Company has commenced a private placement offering (the “Equity Offering”) of 44,200,460 shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Shares”) to existing shareholders of the Company (the “Equity Offering”) in reliance on the exemption from registration under Rule 506(c) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). The purchase price for one share of Common Stock in the Equity Offering is $0.20. The Company expects to receive gross proceeds of approximately $8.8 million in connection with the Equity Offering before deducting offering expenses.  There are no limitations on the Company’s use of such proceeds when received, although it is anticipated that a substantial part of the proceeds will be applied to repayment of existing Company obligations. The Shares are not being registered under the Securities Act and will be “restricted securities” under the Securities Act and will generally be subject to a minimum holding period of six months under Rule 144 before the Shares may be resold. The Shares will be offered and sold only to existing stockholders of record of the Company as of February 28, 2024 (the “Record Date”).

Each qualifying stockholder will be permitted to purchase up to his, her or its pro rata share of the Shares in the Equity Offering, based on the amount of shares of Common Stock owned by such stockholder as of the Record Date, in an amount equal to up to one hundred and eight and one-half percent (108.5%) of the number of shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by such stockholder as of the Record Date. The Equity Offering commenced on or about February 28, 2024, and will remain open for a period of thirty (30) calendar days ending on March 29, 2024 (the “Subscription Deadline”). The Shares will be offered and sold pursuant to a Subscription Agreement (the “Subscription Agreement”) to be entered into by and between the Company and each subscribing stockholder. In connection with the Equity Offering, the Company has entered into a standby purchase agreement dated February 28, 2024 (the “SPA”) with BARC Investments, LLC (“BARC”), an affiliate of the Company owned and controlled by Company directors Alessandra F. Bianco and Richard A. Bianco, Jr.  Under the terms of the SPA, BARC has agreed to act as standby a purchaser for all of the shares of common stock being offered in the Equity Offering that are not otherwise subscribed to by other stockholders prior to the Subscription Deadline.  Additional information about the Equity Offering, including the material terms and conditions of the Equity Offering and information about how stockholders may subscribe for Shares in the Equity Offering, including the form of Subscription Agreement, are set forth in the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on February 28, 2024.

The Company’s Chairman, President and Chief Executive Office, Mr. Richard A. Bianco (“R.A. Bianco”) has indicated that, if and when needed, he would provide a working capital line of credit to the Company on an as needed basis, subject to customary and market terms and conditions to be agreed upon at such time, until such time as the Equity Offering has been completed. However, there can be no assurance that the Equity Offering will be completed within the timeframe contemplated or at all. As of December 31, 2023, Mr. R.A. Bianco provided loans to the Company in the amounts aggregating $3,198,000. In January, February, and March 2024, Mr. R.A. Bianco provided additional loan(s) to the Company. For additional information, see Part II – Item 8 – Note 10 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

For additional information with regard to the Company’s investment in the 111 West 57th Property and the legal proceedings related thereto see Part II – Item 8 – Note 3 and Note 8 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
The Company has incurred operating losses over the last several years and may not be able to achieve profitability.
We expect our operating expenses in 2024 will remain generally close to our most recent levels, although there can be no assurance that the Company’s current level of operating expenses will not increase or that other uses of cash will not be necessary, including increased costs related to the Company’s legal proceeding depending on a variety of factors including the status of legal proceedings, appeals, discovery expert fees, and other litigation related expenses. These losses, among other things, have had and will continue to have an adverse effect on our working capital, total assets and stockholders’ equity.  Because of the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with property development and management, we are unable to predict if or when we may become profitable.
The Company is in a competitive business.

The real estate industry is highly competitive. In addition, the Company expects other major real estate investors, some with much greater resources than the Company has, may compete with the Company for attractive acquisition opportunities.  These competitors include REITs, investment banking firms and private institutional investors.  This competition has increased prices for commercial properties and may impair the Company’s ability to make suitable property acquisitions on favorable terms in the future.

We are a party to a legal proceedingproceedings relating to our equity interest in the joint real estate venture 111 West 57th Partners, and may become subject to additional litigation in the future, anyall of which couldcontinue to have an adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and per share trading price of our common stock.


We are currently party to a lawsuitlawsuits relating to our equity interest in the joint real estate venture 111 West 57th Partners,Property, as further described in Part II – Item 8 – Note 98 to our consolidated financial statements.  There can be no assurance that the Company will prevail with any of its claims with respect to its interests in the 111 West 57th Property or that any course of action will be successful in recovering value for the Company from this investment.  If the Company is unable to recover all or most of the value of its investment in the 111 West 57th Property, there would be a material adverse effect on the Company'sCompany’s financial condition and future prospects.  Most recently, our litigation expensesprospects, including the Company’s ability to date have been funded substantially by advances from Richard A. Bianco, our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer; however, Mr. Bianco is under no obligation to fund the Company's litigation expenses beyond the amounts committed to in his Litigation Funding Agreement with the Company and litigation expenses could exceed such amounts. For additional information with regard to the Litigation Funding Agreement see Part II – Item 8 – Note 10 to our consolidated financial statements.continue as a going concern. In addition, in the future we may become subject to additional litigation, including claims relating to our operations, assets, offerings, and otherwise in the ordinary course of business. Some of these claims may result in significant defense costs and potentially significant judgments against us, some of which are not, or cannot be insured against.  An adverse determination with respect to any of these claims may result in our having to pay material judgments, or settlements, which could have a material adverse effect on our earnings and cash flows, thereby having a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and per share trading price of our common stock. Certain litigation or the resolution of certain litigation may affect the availability or cost of some of our insurance coverage, which could adversely impact our results of operations and cash flows and potentially expose us to increased risks that would be uninsured.


The Company is in a competitive business.
3


The real estate industry is highly competitive.  The Company competes for tenants for its unoccupied rental space with a large number
Illiquidity of real estate property ownerslimits our ability to act quickly.
Real estate investments are relatively illiquid.  Such illiquidity may limit our ability to react quickly in response to changes in economic and other companiesconditions.  If we want to sell an investment, we might not be able to dispose of that sublet properties.  The Company's principal meansinvestment in the time period we desire, and the sales price of competition are rents charged in relation tothat investment might not recoup or exceed the income producing potentialamount of the location.  In addition, the Company expects other major real estate investors, some with much greater resources than the Company has, may compete with the Company for attractive acquisition opportunities.our investment. These competitors include REITs, investment banking firms and private institutional investors.  This competition has increased prices for commercial properties and may impair the Company'slimitations on our ability to make suitable property acquisitionssell properties or investments could have a material adverse effect on favorable terms in the future.our financial condition and results of operations.

Property ownership through equity investments and/or in joint ventures could subject us to the differing business objectives of our co-venturers.

The Company has entered into, and may continue in the future to enter into, equity investments and/or joint ventures (including limited liability companies and partnerships) in which the Company does not hold a direct or controlling interest in the assets underlying the entities in which it invests, including equity investments and/or joint ventures in which (i) the Company owns a direct interest in an entity which controls such assets, or (ii) the Company owns a direct interest in an entity which owns indirect interests, through one or more intermediaries, of such assets. These equity investments and/or joint ventures may include ventures through which the Company would own an indirect economic interest of less than 100 percent of a property owned directly by such joint ventures and may include equity investments and/or joint ventures that the Company does not control or manage.  These investments involve risks that do not exist with properties in which the Company owns a controlling interest with respect to the underlying assets, including the possibility that (i) we may become subject to material, legal disputes with our joint venture partners, as is the case with respect to our investment in the 111 West 57th Property; (ii) our co-venturers or partners may, at any time, become insolvent or otherwise refuse to make capital contributions when due, (iii) we may be subject to additional capital calls for joint venture development or other expenses which we may be unable or unwilling to meet, possibly resulting in substantial dilution of our investment, (iv) we may become liable with respect to guarantees of payment or performance by the joint ventures, or (v) we may become subject to buy-sell arrangements which could cause us to sell our interests or acquire our co-venturer'sco-venturer’s or partner'spartner’s interests in a joint venture.  Even where we have major decision rights or do not have major decision rights, because we lack a controlling interest, our co-venturers or partners may be in a position to take action contrary to our instructions or requests or contrary to our policies or objectives.  While we seek protective rights against such contrary actions, there can be no assurance that we will be successful in procuring any such protective rights, or if procured, that the rights will be sufficient to fully protect us against contrary actions.  Our organizational documents do not limit the amount of available funds that we may invest in equity investments and/or joint ventures and/or partnerships.  If the objectives of our co-venturers or partners are inconsistent with ours, it may adversely affect our ability to make receive and distributions or payments to our investors.

We may be unable to identify suitable properties for equity investments and acquisitions and any new investments and acquisitions may fail to perform as expected and subject us to new risks, including risks created by geographic concentration.
The Company has incurred operating losses over the last several years and may not be able to achieve or maintain profitability.

The Company has incurred operating losses over the last several years.  The Company has also made significantidentify suitable properties for equity investments in the 111 West 57th Street Property in 2013, 2014 and 2015.  We expect our operating expenses in 2018 will remain relatively close to our most recent levels.  These losses, among other things, have had and will continue to have an adverse effect on our working capital, total assets and stockholders' equity.  Because of the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with property development and management,acquisitions. Even if we are unableable to predict if or whenidentify suitable properties for equity investments and acquisitions, we may become profitable, or if the Company's current financial resources will be adequate to fund operations over the next several years.  Nonetheless the Company will seek to manage its current level of cash and cash equivalents through various sources, including but not limited to reducing operating expenses, possible asset sales and/or long term borrowings.

Illiquidity of real estate limits our ability to act quickly.
Real estate investments are relatively illiquid.  Such illiquidity may limit our ability to react quickly in response to changes in economic and other conditions.  If we want to sell an investment, we might not be able to disposecarry out such equity investments or acquisitions on favorable terms, or at all. Any new equity investments in properties or newly acquired properties may not perform as expected and may subject us to unknown liability with respect to liabilities relating to such properties for clean-up of that investmentundisclosed environmental contamination or claims by tenants, residents, vendors or other persons against the former owners of the properties.  Inaccurate assumptions regarding future rental or occupancy rates, or fluctuations in the time period we desire,target market could result in overly optimistic estimates of future revenues.  In addition, future operating expenses or the costs necessary to bring an acquired property up to standards established for its intended market position may be underestimated. The search for and the sales priceprocess of that investment might not recoup or exceed theacquiring such properties will also require a substantial amount of our investment. These limitations on our ability to sell our properties or investments could have a material adverse effect on our financial conditionmanagement’s time and results of operations.attention.

Fluctuations in the local market in which the Company's currentCompany’s equity investment in a development property is located may adversely impact the Company'sCompany’s financial condition and operating results.

The Company's current111 West 57th Property, which the Company purchased an equity investment in a development propertyduring 2013, is located in New York City. This geographic concentration could present risks if the New York City property market performance falls below expectations. The economic condition of this market could affect occupancy, property revenues, and expenses, from the property and its underlyingfuture asset value.
The financial resultsCompany may not be able to insure certain risks economically.
The Company may experience economic harm if any damage to the Company’s property or properties is not covered by insurance. The Company cannot be certain that the Company will be able to insure all risks that the Company desires to insure economically or that all of major local employers alsothe Company’s insurers will be financially viable if the Company makes a claim. The Company may impactsuffer losses that are not covered under the cash flow and valueCompany’s insurance policies. If an uninsured loss or a loss in excess of insured limits should occur, the Company could lose capital invested in a property. This could have a negative impact onproperty or properties, as well as any potential future revenue from the Company's financial condition and operating results, which could affect the Company's ability to receive distributions from its investment interest in the property.property or properties.


Development and redevelopment activities may be delayed, not completed, and/or not achieve expected results.


As the Company pursuesThe Company’s investments in and/or development and redevelopment projects, these projects generally require various governmental and other approvals, which have no assurance of being received. The Company's investment in development and redevelopment activities generally entail certain risks, including the following:


-
funds may be expended, and management'smanagement’s time devoted to projects that may not be completed,
-
required approvals may not be obtained from governmental entities or other third parties,
-
construction costs of a project may exceed original estimates, possibly makingnegatively impacting the economic feasibility of the project, economically unfeasible,
-
projects may be delayed due to, without limitation, adverse weather conditions, labor or material shortages,
-
occupancy rates and rents at a completed project may be less than anticipated, and
-
expenses at completed development projects may be higher than anticipated.

These risks may reduce the funds available for distribution to the Company and have a material adverse effect on the Company'sCompany’s financial condition and results of operations. Further, investment in and the development and redevelopment of real estate is also subject to the general risks associated with real estate investments. For further information regarding these risks, see the risk factor "The Company is subject to risks inherent in owning, developing and leasing real estate."








The Company is subject to risks inherent in owning, developing and leasing real estate.

The Company is subject to varying degrees of risk generally related to leasing and owning real estate, many of which are beyond the Company's control. In addition to general risks related to owning commercial real estate, the Company's risks include, among others:

-deterioration in regional and local economic and real estate market conditions,
-failure to complete construction and lease-up on schedule or within budget may increase debt service expense and construction and other costs,
-increased operating costs, including insurance premiums, utilities and real estate taxes, due to inflation and other factors which may not necessarily be offset by increased rents,
-changes in interest rate levels and the availability of financing,
-fluctuations in tourism patterns,
-
adverse changes in laws and regulations (including tax, environmental, zoning and building codes, landlord/tenant and other  housing laws and regulations) and agency or court interpretations of such laws and regulations and the related costs of compliance,
-potential changes in supply of, or demand for rental properties similar to the Company's,
-competition for tenants and changes in rental rates,
-concentration in a single real estate asset and class,
-needs for additional capital which may be required for needed development or repositioning of one or more real estate assets may exceed the Company's abilities or its desired minimum level of liquidity,
-difficulty in reletting properties on favorable terms or at all,
-impairments in the Company's ability to collect rent payments when due,
-the potential for uninsured casualty and other losses,
-the impact of present or future environmental legislation and compliance with environmental laws,
-changes in federal or state tax laws, and
-acts of terrorism and war.

Each of these factors could have a material adverse effect on the Company's ability to receive distributions from its properties and investments and the Company's financial condition and results of operations.  In addition, real estate investments are relatively illiquid, which means that the Company's ability to promptly sell the Company's property in response to changes in economic and other conditions may be limited.











Our insurance coverage on our property or properties may be inadequate or our insurance providers may default on their obligations to pay claims. 

We currently carry comprehensive insurance on our property or properties, including insurance for liability, fire and flood.  We cannot guarantee that the limits of our current policies will be sufficient in the event of a catastrophe to our property or properties.  We cannot guarantee that we will be able to renew or duplicate our current insurance coverage in adequate amounts or at reasonable prices.  In addition, while our current insurance policies insure us against loss from terrorist acts and toxic mold, in the future, insurance companies may no longer offer coverage against these types of losses, or, if offered, these types of insurance may be prohibitively expensive.  If any or all of the foregoing should occur, we may not have insurance coverage against certain types of losses and/or there may be decreases in the limits of insurance available.  Should an uninsured loss or a loss in excess of our insured limits occur, we could lose all or a portion of the capital we have invested in a property or properties, as well as the anticipated future revenue from the property or properties.  We cannot guarantee that material losses in excess of insurance proceeds will not occur in the future.  If any of our properties were to experience a catastrophic loss, it could seriously disrupt our operations, delay revenue and result in large expenses to repair or rebuild the property.  Such events could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.  If one or more of our insurance providers were to fail to pay a claim as a result of insolvency, bankruptcy or otherwise, the nonpayment of such claims could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.  In addition, if one or more of our insurance providers were to become subject to insolvency, bankruptcy or other proceedings and our insurance policies with the provider were terminated or canceled as a result of those proceedings, we cannot guarantee that we would be able to find alternative coverage in adequate amounts or at reasonable prices.  In such case, we could experience a lapse in any or adequate insurance coverage with respect to one or more properties and be exposed to potential losses relating to any claims that may arise during such period of lapsed or inadequate coverage.

We are dependent on our key personnel whose continued service is not guaranteed and the loss of whose service could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Whether our business is successful will be dependent in part upon the leadership, strategic business direction and real estate experience of our executive officers, particularly Richard A.Mr. R.A. Bianco, our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer.  Although we have entered into an employment agreement with Mr. R.A. Bianco, none of our executive officers or directors are subject to any covenants not to compete against the Company should they terminate their affiliation with the Company. While we believe that we could find replacements for these key personnel, loss of their services could adversely affect our operations.  Although we carry some key man life insurance on Mr. Bianco, the amount of such coverage may not be sufficient to offset any adverse economic effects on our operations and weWe do not carry key man life insurance on any of our other executive officers or directors.

The Company may not be able to insure certain risks economically.

The Company may experience economic harm if any damage to the Company's property or properties is not covered by insurance. The Company cannot be certain that the Company will be able to insure all risks that the Company desires to insure economically or that all of the Company's insurers will be financially viable if the Company makes a claim. The Company may suffer losses that are not covered under the Company's insurance policies. If an uninsured loss or a loss in excess of insured limits should occur, the Company could lose capital invested in a property or properties, as well as any future revenue from the property or properties.

Changes in the composition of the Company'sCompany’s assets and liabilities through acquisitions, divestitures or corporate restructuring may affect the Company'sCompany’s results.


The Company may make future acquisitions or divestitures of assets or changes in how such assets are held. Any change in the composition of the Company'sCompany’s assets and liabilities or how such assets and liabilities are held could significantly affect the Company'sCompany’s financial position and the risks that the Company faces.

The Company may not be able to generate sufficient taxable income to fully realize the Company's deferred tax asset.

The Company has federal income tax net operating loss ("NOL") carryforwards and other tax attributes.  If the Company is unable to generate sufficient taxable income, the Company may not be able to fully realize the benefit of the NOL carryforwards.




Changes in tax laws and uncertainties in the interpretation and application of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Job Act could materially affect our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

In December 2017, the United States ("U.S.") government enacted comprehensive income tax legislation commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the "2017 Tax Act"). The 2017 Tax Act makes broad and complex changes to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), including, among other changes, significant changes to the U.S. corporate tax rate and certain other changes to the Code that impact the taxation of corporations. In certain instances the 2017 Tax Act requires complex computations to be performed that generally were not previously required by the Code and the regulations promulgated thereunder; significant judgments to be made in interpreting the provisions of the 2017 Tax Act significant estimates to be made in certain calculations; and the preparation and analysis of information generally not previously relevant or regularly produced. The U.S. Treasury Department, the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS"), and other standard-setting bodies could interpret or issue guidance on how provisions of the 2017 Tax Act will be applied or otherwise administered that differs from our interpretation. As we complete our analysis of the 2017 Tax Act, collect and prepare necessary data, and interpret any additional guidance, we may make adjustments to provisional amounts that we have recorded that may materially impact our provision for income taxes in the period in which the adjustments are made. Additionally, there is risk relating to assumptions regarding the outcome of tax matters, based in whole or in part upon consultation with outside advisors; risk relating to potential unfavorable decisions in tax proceedings; and risks regarding changes in, and/or interpretations of federal and state income tax laws. Additionally, the Company's tax advisors indicate that the IRS typically has broad discretion to examine taxpayer tax returns, even after refunds have been paid to taxpayers, which could result in adjustments to AMT Credit carryforward amounts claimed as refundable and/or AMT Credit carryforward amounts ultimately received.


Terrorist attacks and other acts of violence or war may affect the market, on which the Company'sCompany’s common stock trades, the markets in which the Company operates the Company'sCompany’s operations and the Company'sCompany’s results of operations.


Terrorist attacks or armed conflicts could affect the Company'sCompany’s business or the businesses of the Company'sCompany’s tenants. The consequences of armed conflicts are unpredictable, and the Company may not be able to foresee events that could have an adverse effect on the Company'sCompany’s business. More generally, any of these events could cause consumer confidence and spending to decrease or result in increased volatility in the U.S. and worldwide financial markets and economy. They also could be a factor resulting in, or a continuation of, an economic recession in the U.S. or abroad. Any of these occurrences could have a significant adverse impact on the Company'sCompany’s operating results and revenues and may result in volatility of the market price for the Company'sCompany’s common stock.


The Company is subject to risks inherent in owning, developing and leasing real estate.

The Company is subject to varying degrees of risk generally related to leasing and owning real estate, many of which are beyond the Company’s control. In addition to general risks related to owning commercial real estate, the Company’s risks include, among others:

-
deterioration in regional and local economic and real estate market conditions,
-
failure to complete construction and lease-up on schedule or within budget may increase debt service expense and construction and other costs,
-
increased operating costs, including insurance premiums, utilities and real estate taxes, due to inflation and other factors which may not necessarily be offset by increased rents,
-
changes in interest rate levels, rates of inflation and the availability of financing,
-
fluctuations in tourism patterns,
-
adverse changes in laws and regulations (including tax, environmental, zoning and building codes, landlord/tenant and other housing laws and regulations) and agency or court interpretations of such laws and regulations and the related costs of compliance,
-
potential changes in supply of, or demand for rental properties similar to the Company’s,
-
competition for tenants and changes in rental rates,
-
concentration in a single real estate asset and class,
-
needs for additional capital which may be required for needed development or repositioning of one or more real estate assets may exceed the Company’s abilities or its desired minimum level of liquidity,
-
difficulty in reletting properties on favorable terms or at all,
-
impairments in the Company’s ability to collect rent payments when due,
-
the potential for uninsured casualty and other losses,
-
the impact of present or future environmental legislation and compliance with environmental laws,
-
changes in federal or state tax laws,
-
the effects of global pandemics such as COVID-19 and government responses thereto; and
-
acts of terrorism and war.
Each of these factors could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s ability to receive distributions from its properties and investments and the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.  In addition, real estate investments are relatively illiquid, which means that the Company’s ability to promptly sell the Company’s property in response to changes in economic and other conditions may be limited.

Security breaches and other disruptions could compromise our information and expose us to liability, which would cause our business and reputation to suffer.


In the ordinary course of our business, we collect and store sensitive data that may include intellectual property, our proprietary business information and that of our tenants and business partners, including personally identifiable information of our tenants and employees, on our networks.  Despite our security measures, our information technology and infrastructure may be vulnerable to attacks by hackers or breached due to employee error, malfeasance or other disruptions.  Any such breach could compromise our networks and the information stored there could be accessed, publicly disclosed, lost or stolen. Any such access, disclosure or other loss of information could result in legal claims or proceedings, liability under laws that protect the privacy of personal information, disrupt our operations, and damage our reputation, which could adversely affect our business.


The Company may not be able to generate sufficient taxable income to fully realize the Company’s deferred tax asset.

The Company has federal income tax net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards and other tax attributes.  If the Company is unable to generate sufficient taxable income, the Company may not be able to fully realize the benefit of the NOL carryforwards.

Because the Company from time to time maintains a majority of its assets in cash and/or securities, the Company may in the future be deemed to be an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940 resulting in additional costs and regulatory burdens.


Currently, the Company believes that either it is not within the definition of "Investment Company"“Investment Company” as the term is defined under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the "1940 Act"“1940 Act”) or, alternatively, may rely on one or more of the 1940 Act'sAct’s exemptions. The Company intends to continue to conduct its operations in a manner that will exempt the Company from the registration requirements of the 1940 Act. If the Company were to be deemed to be an investment company because of the Company'sCompany’s investments securities holdings, the Company would be required to register as an investment company under the 1940 Act.  The 1940 Act places significant restrictions on the capital structure and corporate governance of a registered investment company, and materially restricts its ability to conduct transactions with affiliates. Compliance with the 1940 Act could also increase the Company'sCompany’s operating costs.  Such changes could have a material adverse effect on the Company'sCompany’s business, results of operations and financial condition.


Anti-takeover Risks

Our amended and restated shareholder rights plan may delay or prevent an acquisition of us that shareholders may consider favorable or may prevent efforts by our shareholders to change our directors or our management, which could decrease the value of your common shares.

On March 27, 2019, the Company’s Board of Directors adopted the New Rights Plan which is designed to provide adequate time for our Board of Directors and shareholders to assess an unsolicited takeover bid for our company, to provide our Board of Directors with sufficient time to explore and develop alternatives for maximizing shareholder value if a takeover bid is made, and to provide shareholders with an equal opportunity to participate in a takeover bid and receive full and fair value for their common shares. The New Rights Plan is set to expire on March 27, 2029. The rights will become exercisable only when a person, including any party related to it, acquires or attempts to acquire 25% or more of our outstanding common stock. Should such an acquisition occur or be announced, each right would, upon exercise, entitle a rights holder, other than the acquiring person and related persons, to purchase common shares at a 50% discount to the market price at the time. The New Rights Plan may inhibit a change in control of the Company by a third party in a transaction not approved by the Company’s Board of Directors. If a change in control is inhibited or delayed in this manner, it may adversely affect the market price of the Company’s common stock.

Other Risks

Outbreaks of highly infectious or contagious diseases may, materially and adversely impact the business, income, cash flow, results of operations and financial condition of the Company, including the 111 West 57th Property.

The national and global impacts of a pandemic, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, may present material uncertainty and risk with respect to our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Moreover, many of the risk factors set forth in this Form 10-K could be interpreted as heightened risks as a result of the impact of a pandemic. Impacts from a pandemic may include the following:

State, local, and federal entities may impose restrictions, for varying times and to varying degrees, on our ability to enforce tenant’s contractual lease obligations, and this may affect our ability to enforce all our remedies (such as pursuing collections and seeking evictions) for the failure to pay rent.
Consumers whose income has declined, who are working remotely or who cannot freely access neighborhood amenities like restaurants, may decide to live in a location other than New York City.
Various state, local and federal rules may require us to waive late fees and certain other customary fees associated with tenant rent obligations. These requirements or practices may result in a loss of revenue.
A property may incur significant costs or losses related to shelter-in-place or stay-at-home orders, quarantines, infection, clean-up costs or other related factors.
There may be concerns related to the general economy about (i) supply chain constraints and (ii) inflation caused by both supply chain constraints and governmental fiscal and monetary policies. Supply chain constraints could cause delays in any construction and redevelopment activity, and inflation could cause any construction and operating costs to increase without a commensurate increase in our rental revenue.
The same factors as described immediately above may also impact our workforce. A disruption in the normal operations of our workforce, as well as the possibility of illness among our employees or a substantial portion of our workforce, could also adversely affect our operations.

We face possible risks associated with the physical effects of climate change.

We cannot predict with certainty whether climate change is occurring and, if so, at what rate. However, the physical effects of climate change could have a material adverse effect on our 111 West 57th Property, operations, and business. To the extent climate change causes changes in weather patterns or severity, our markets could experience increase in storm intensity (including floods, tornadoes, hurricanes, or snow and ice storms), rising sea-levels, and changes in precipitation, temperature, air quality, and quality and availability of water. Over time, these conditions could result in physical damage to, or declining demand for, our properties or our inability to operate the buildings efficiently or at all. Climate change may also indirectly affect our business by increasing the cost of (or making unavailable) property insurance on terms we find acceptable, increasing the cost of required resources, including energy, other fuel sources, water, and waste and snow removal services, and increasing the risk and severity of flood and earthquakes at our properties. Should the impact of climate change be severe or occur for lengthy periods of time, our financial condition or results of operations could be adversely impacted. In addition, compliance with new or more stringent laws or regulations or stricter interpretations of existing laws may require material expenditure by us. For example, various federal, state, and local laws and regulations have been implemented or are under consideration to mitigate the effects of climate change caused by greenhouse gas emissions. Among other things, “green” building codes may seek to reduce emissions through the imposition of standards for design, construction materials, water and energy usage and efficiency, and waste management. Such codes could require us to make improvements to our existing properties, increase the costs of maintaining or improving our existing properties or developing new properties, or increase taxes and fees assessed on us or our properties. Expenditures required for compliance with such codes may affect our cash flow and results of operations.

ITEM 1B.UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS


None.


ITEM 1C.CYBERSECURITY

The Company’s information technology, communication networks, system applications, accounting and financial reporting platforms and related systems are integral to the operation of the business.  The Company utilizes these systems, among others, for financial analysis, management, and reporting, and for various other aspects of the business.

The Company’s cybersecurity strategy is focused on detection, protection, incident response, security risk management and mitigation, and resiliency of the cybersecurity infrastructure. The Company relies on third party service providers to operate and maintain its information technology infrastructure and systems and to evaluate, test and update various information security processes and to manage material risks from cybersecurity threats to the Company’s critical computer networks, third-party hosted services, communications systems, hardware and software, and critical data, including confidential information that is proprietary, strategic or competitive in nature, as well as any personally identifiable information related to any tenants’ and employees’ personal data.

The Company identifies and assesses risks from cybersecurity threats by monitoring and evaluating the cybersecurity threat environment and the Company’s risk profile. The Company is not currently aware of any risks from cybersecurity threats nor has the Company had a previously cybersecurity incident that in either case have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect the Company, its business strategy, results of operations or financial condition.

The Company’s Audit Committee holds oversight responsibility over the Company’s cybersecurity strategy and risk management.  The Audit Committee engages in regular discussions with executive management regarding the Company’s significant financial risk exposures and the measures implemented to monitor and control these risks, including those that may result from material cybersecurity threats.

ITEM 2.PROPERTIES
ITEM 2.PROPERTIES

At December 31, 2017, the Company owned a commercial office building in Greenwich, Connecticut. The building was approximately 14,500 square feet with approximately 3,500 square feet utilized by the Company for office space. On January 26, 2018, the Company sold its commercial office building in Greenwich, Connecticut, see Part II – Item 8 – Note 3 to the Company's consolidated financial statements for additional information.


The Company leasesrents approximately 1,085150 square feet of office space for its executive office at One South Ocean Boulevard,7857 West Sample Road, Suite 301, Boca Raton, Florida 33432, with134, Coral Springs, FL 33065 on a lease expiration dateshort term basis. The Company also rents on a short term basis approximately 200 square feet of office space in March 2019.Emerson, NJ.


ITEM 3.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
ITEM 3.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS


For a discussion of the Company'sCompany’s legal proceedings, see Part II - Item 8 - Note 9 8 to the Company'sCompany’s consolidated financial statements.


From time to time, the Company and its subsidiaries may be named as a defendant in various lawsuits or proceedings.  At the current time, except as set forth in Part II - Item 8 - Note 9 8 to the Company'sCompany’s consolidated financial statements, the Company is unaware of any legal proceedings pending against the Company.  The Company intends to aggressively contest all litigation and contingencies, as well as pursue all sources for contributions to settlements. However, there can be no assurance that the Company will prevail with respect to any of its claims.


ITEM 4.MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES


Not applicable.


PART II


ITEM 5.MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'SREGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS, AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES


The Common Stock of the Company is quoted in the over-the-counter market under the symbol ABCP. The sales prices per share for the Company's Common Stock represent the range of the reported high and low bid quotations. Such prices reflect interdealer prices, without retail mark-up, markdown or commission, and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.

  2017  2016 
  High  Low  High  Low 
First Quarter $1.45  $0.82  $2.22  $1.62 
Second Quarter  1.27   0.97   1.78   1.32 
Third Quarter  1.00   0.17   1.28   1.04 
Fourth Quarter  0.38   0.16   1.10   0.84 


As of February 28, 2018,15, 2024, there were approximately 8,2005,900 beneficial owners of the Company'sCompany’s Common Stock.  No dividends were declared or paid on the Company's Common Stock in 2017 and 2016.  The Company has no current plans to declare or pay dividends in the foreseeable future.

For information concerning the Company's stockholder rights plan, see Part II - Item 8 - Note 6 to the Company's consolidated financial statements.


Common Stock Repurchase Plan


The Company'sCompany’s common stock repurchase plan (the "Repurchase Plan"“Repurchase Plan”) allows for the repurchase by the Company of its common stock in the open market.  The Repurchase Plan is conditioned upon favorable business conditions and acceptable prices for the common stock. Purchases under the Repurchase Plan may be made, from time to time, in the open market, through block trades or otherwise. Depending on market conditions and other factors, purchases may be commenced or suspended any time or from time to time without prior notice.  No common stock repurchases have been made pursuant to the Repurchase Plan during 20172023 or 2016.2022. Due to the Company’s current financial condition and ongoing litigation proceedings, the Company does not anticipate that it will make any stock purchases pursuant to the Repurchase Plan in the next twelve months. For additional information see Part II - Item 8 - Note 5 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.


ITEM 6.[RESERVED]
ITEM 6.SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA


Not applicable.


ITEM 7.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

ITEM 7.MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS

Management'sManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes, which are contained in Part II - Item 8, herein.


BUSINESS OVERVIEW


AmBase Corporation (the "Company"“Company” or "AmBase"“AmBase”) is a Delaware corporation that was incorporated in 1975.  AmBase is a holding company.

At December 31, 2017,2023, the Company'sCompany’s assets consisted primarily of cash and cash equivalents, real estate owned and a deferred tax asset. On January 26, 2018, the Company sold its commercial office building in Greenwich, Connecticut, see Part II – Item 8 – Note 3 to the Company's consolidated financial statements for additional information. See Part II – Item 8 – Note 8 to the Company's consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding taxes.equivalents.  The Company is engaged in the management of its assets and liabilities.


In June 2013, the Company purchased an equity interest in a real estate development property through a joint venture agreement to purchase and develop real property located at 105 through 111 West 57th Street in New York, New York (the "111“111 West 57th Property"Property”). The Company is engaged in material disputes and litigation with regard to the sponsors111 West 57th Property. Despite ongoing litigation challenging the legitimacy of the joint venture (the "Sponsor")actions taken in connection with the “Strict Foreclosure”, (as defined and a mezzanine lender tofurther discussed herein), the joint venture ("Spruce"). The Company recorded an impairment for the full amount of its equity investment in the 111 West 57th Property in the full year period ended December 31, 2017. See Part II – Item 8 – Note 4 and Note 9Prior to the Company's consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding this impairment charge andStrict Foreclosure, the legal proceedings relating to the Company's investment in the 111 West 57th Property.  The carrying value of the Company'sCompany’s equity investment in the 111 West 57th Property represented a substantial portion of the Company'sCompany’s assets and net equity value. The Company has

For additional information regarding the Company’s recording of an appeal pending onimpairment of its equity investment in the 111 West 57th Property in 2017 and the Company’s legal proceedings relating to the 111 West 57th Property, including the Company’s challenge to the strict foreclosure which has not yet been resolved.   

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY

The Company's assets at December 31, 2017, aggregated $21,878,000, consisting principally of cash and cash equivalents of $70,000 and real estate owned, net of $1,632,000 and a deferred tax asset of $20,092,000.  At December 31, 2017, the Company's liabilities aggregated $2,722,000.  In addition, the Company has a litigation funding amount of $1,354,000 as further discussed in Part II – Item 8 – Note 10 of the Company's consolidated financial statements.  Total stockholders' equity was $17,802,000.

At December 31, 2017, real estate owned consisted of a 14,500 square foot commercial office building in Greenwich, Connecticut, managed and operated by the Company. On January 26, 2018, the Company sold its commercial office building in Greenwich, Connecticut, to Maria USA, Inc. an unaffiliated third party. The sale price was $5,200,000, less normal real estate closing adjustments.  A gain from the sale will be reflected in the Company's financial statements for the quarterly period ending March 31, 2018. The Company used the sale proceeds to repay the full amount of the working capital loan plus accrued interest aggregating $2,623,000, to Mr. Richard A. Banco, the Company's Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer. The remaining proceeds will be used for working capital. See Strict Foreclosure, seePart II – Item 8 – Note 3 and Note 12 8to the Company'sCompany’s consolidated financial statements, for additional information.statements.


A fundamental principle of the preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP is the assumption that an entity will continue in existence as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations and the realization of assets and settlement of liabilities occurring in the ordinary course of business. In accordance with this requirement, the Company has prepared its accompanying consolidated financial statements assuming the Company will continue as a going concern.LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES


The Company's deferred tax assetCompany’s assets at December 31, 2017, is due to a valuation allowance which2023, aggregated $78,000, consisting of cash and cash equivalents.  At December 31, 2023, the Company’s liabilities aggregated $6,423,000.  Total stockholders’ deficit was released in relation to the AMT Credit carryforwards which are projected to be refundable as part of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act enacted in December 2017.  See herein below and Part II – Item 8 – Note 8 to the Company's consolidated financial statements, for additional information.$6,345,000.





The Company has incurred operating losses and used cash for operating activities for the past several years. In June 2013, the Company purchased an equity interest in a real estate development property through a joint venture agreement to purchase and develop real property located at 105 through 111 West 57th Street in New York, New York (the "111 West 57th Property"). The Company has also made significant investments in the 111 West 57th Street Property in 2013, 2014 and 2015. The Company is engaged in material disputes and litigation with the sponsors of the joint venture (the "Sponsor") and a mezzanine lender to the joint venture ("Spruce"). The Company recorded an impairment of its equity investment in the 111 West 57th Property in the full year period ended December 31, 2017. See Part II – Item 8 – Note 4 and Note 9 to the Company's consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding this impairment charge and the legal proceedings relating to the Company's investment in the 111 West 57th Property.  The carrying value of the Company's equity investment in the 111 West 57th Property represented a substantial portion of the Company's assets and net equity value. The Company has an appeal pending on its challenge to the strict foreclosure which has not yet been resolved. The Company has continued to keep operating expenses at a reduced level; however, there can be no assurance that the Company'sCompany’s current level of operating expenses will not increase or that other uses of cash will not be necessary.  The Company believes that based on its current level of operating expenses, its currently availableexisting cash and financial resources, together with the net proceeds from the sale of its commercial office building in Greenwich, Connecticut as further discussed in Part II – Item 8 – Note 3 to the Company's consolidated financial statements,cash equivalents may not be sufficient to cover operating cash needs through the twelve month period from the financial statement reporting date. Based on the above factors, management determined there is substantial doubt about the Company'sCompany’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued. The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include adjustments to the carrying value of assets and liabilities, which might be necessary should the Company not continue in operation.


Over the next several months,In order to continue as a going concern, the Company will seekmust take steps to manage its current level of cash and cash equivalents, through various ways, including but not limited to, reducing operating expenses, possible asset sales and/raising additional capital through the sale of equity or long termdebt securities or long-term borrowings, which may include additional borrowings from affiliates of the Company, although this cannot be assured. In order to continue on a long-term basis, the Company must raise additional capital through the sale of assets or long term borrowings.reducing operating expenses, and seeking recoveries from various sources. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to sell any of its assetsadequately implement these cash management measures, in whole or attain suchin part or raise capital or obtain financing aton terms acceptable to the Company, if at all.


In May 2016,June 2013, the Company and Mr. Richard A. Bianco, the Company's Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer ("Mr. R. A. Bianco") entered intopurchased an agreement for Mr. R. A. Bianco to provide to the Company a secured working capital line of credit. Pursuant to this agreement, Mr. Bianco made several loans to the Company, aggregating $2,296,000 as of December 31, 2017, for use as working capital.  The loans accrued interest at 5.25% per annum and were due on the earlier of the date the Company received funds from any source sufficient to pay all amounts due under the loans, including accrued interest thereon, or December 31, 2019. In January 2018, pursuant to the WC Agreement, Mr. R. A. Bianco made an additional loan of $250,000 to the Company for use as working capital in accordance with the same terms of the loans payable noted above. On January 26, 2018, in connection with the sale by the Company of its commercial office building in Greenwich, Connecticut, the Company repaid the full amount of the working capital loan, plus accrued interest aggregating $2,623,000 to Mr. R. A. Bianco, and the working capital line of credit agreement was terminated. For additional information, see Part II – Item 8 – Note 12 to the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In April 2016, the Company filed an action in New York State Supreme Court against the Sponsors, et al., pursuant to which the Company is seeking compensatory damages, as well as punitive damages, indemnification and equitable relief, including a declaration of the parties' rights, and an accounting.  For additional information, see Part II – Item 8 – Note 4 and Note 9 to the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In July 2017, the Company initiated a second litigation in the NY Court, Index No. 655031/2017, (the "111 West 57th Spruce Action"). The defendants in the 111 West 57th Spruce action are 111 W57 Mezz Investor, LLC, Spruce Capital Partners LLC, 111 West 57th Sponsor LLC, Michael Z. Stern, and Kevin P. Maloney (collectively, "Defendants") and nominal defendants 111 West 57th Partners LLC and 111 West 57th Mezz 1 LLC. The junior mezzanine lender ("Spruce") had given notice to the junior mezzanine borrower that it proposed to accept the pledged collateral (including the joint venture members' collective interest in the property) in full satisfaction of the joint venture's indebtedness under the Junior Mezzanine Loan (i.e., a "Strict Foreclosure").








On August 30, 2017, Spruce issued a Notice of Retention of Pledged Collateral in Full Satisfaction of Indebtedness. By purporting to accept the pledged collateral, pursuant to a Strict Foreclosure process, Spruce claims to have completed the retention of the collateral pledged by the junior mezzanine borrower, and therefore, the Company'sequity interest in the 111 West 57th Street57th Property. The Company is engaged in material disputes and litigation with regard to the 111 West 57th Property. Despite ongoing litigation challenging the legitimacy of the actions taken in connection with the “Strict Foreclosure”, (as defined and further discussed herein), in accordance with GAAP, the Company recorded an impairment for the full amount of its equity investment in the 111 West 57th57th Property of $63,745,000 forin 2017. Prior to the full year period ended December 31, 2017. TheStrict Foreclosure, the carrying value of the Company'sCompany’s equity investment in the 111 West 57th Property represented a substantial portion of the Company'sCompany’s assets and net equity value.


As noted above, despite ongoing litigation challenging the legitimacy of the actions taken by the Sponsors and Spruce in connection with the Company's investment in the 111 West 57th Property as further discussed herein, in accordance with GAAP, the Company recorded an impairment of its equity investment in the 111 West 57th Property in the full year period ended December 31, 2017. The Company is and will continue to pursue the recovery of its asset value from various sources of recovery; however, there can be no assurance that the Company will prevail with respect to any of its claims. For additional information with regard to the Company's legal proceedings concerning the 111 West 57th Property, see Part II – Item 8 – Note 4 and Note 9 to the Company's consolidated financial statements.

The Company has an appeal pending on its challenge to the Strict Foreclosure, which has not yet been resolved. The Company is currently attempting to have the Appellate Division declare the Strict Foreclosure invalid and to enjoin the Strict Foreclosure. The Company moved for a stay or injunctive relief pending appeal, and that motion was denied by the appellate court on January 18, 2018. See Part II – Item 8 – Note 4 and Note 9 to the Company's consolidated financial statements for additional information concerning the Company's pending appeal of its challenge to the Strict Foreclosure and the Company'sCompany’s recording of an impairment of its equity investment in the 111 West 57th Property.

In SeptemberProperty in 2017 and the Company and Mr. R. A. Bianco entered into an agreement pursuantCompany’s legal proceedings relating to which Mr. R. A. Bianco will fund the Company's litigation expenses in connection with the 111 West 57th Property, (the "Litigation Funding Agreement").   For additional information including the terms ofCompany’s challenge to the Litigation Funding Agreement;Strict Foreclosure, see Part II – Item 8 – Note 103 and Note 8 to the Company'sCompany’s consolidated financial statements. The Company's consolidated balance sheet for December 31, 2017, includes $1,354,000 as a litigation funding amount which reflects the aggregate amounts funded pursuant to the Litigation Funding Agreement as of December 31, 2017.


With respect to its disputes and litigation relating to its interest in the 111 West 57th Property, the Company is continuingpursuing, and will continue to pursue, other options to realize the Company’s investment value, various legal courses of action to protect its legal rights, recovery of its asset value from various sources of recovery, as well as considering other possible economic strategies, including the possible sale of the Company'sCompany’s interest in and/or rights with respect to the 111 West 57th Property. The57th Property; however, there can be no assurance that the Company is continuingwill prevail with respect to pursue other options to realize the Company's investment value and/or protectany of its legal rights.claims.

The Company can give no assurances regarding the outcome of the matters described herein, including as to the effect of Spruce'sSpruce’s actions described herein, whether the Sponsors will perform their contractual commitments to the Company under the JV Agreement, as to what further action, if any, the lenders may take with respect to the project, as to the ultimate resolution of the ongoing litigation proceedings relating to the Company'sCompany’s investment interest in the 111 West 57th Property, as to the ultimate effect of the Sponsors'Sponsors’, the Company'sCompany’s or the lenders'lenders’ actions on the project, as to the completion or ultimate success of the project, or as to the value or ultimate realization of any portion of the Company'sCompany’s equity investment in the 111 West 57th Street Property. For additional information regarding the Company’s investment in the 111 West 57th Property and the legal proceedings related thereto see Part II – Item 8 – Note 3 and Note 8 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.


While the Company'sCompany’s management is evaluating future courses of action to protect and/or recover the value of the Company'sCompany’s equity investment in the 111 West 57th Property, the adverse developments make it uncertain as to whether any such courses of action will be successful. Any such efforts are likely to require sustained effort over a period of time and require substantial additional financial resources. Inability to recover all or most of such value would, in all likelihood, have a material adverse effect on the Company'sCompany’s financial condition and future prospects. The Company can give no assurances with regard to if it will prevail with respect to any of its claims.


To provide the necessary cash resources to continue operations and continue the litigation related to the 111 West 57th Property, the Company has commenced a private placement offering (the “Equity Offering”) of 44,200,460 shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Shares”) to existing shareholders of the Company (the “Equity Offering”) in reliance on the exemption from registration under Rule 506(c) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). The amounts noted hereinpurchase price for one share of Common Stock in the Equity Offering is $0.20. The Company expects to receive gross proceeds of approximately $8.8 million in connection with the Equity Offering before deducting offering expenses.  There are no limitations on the Company’s use of such proceeds when received, although it is anticipated that a substantial part of the proceeds will be applied to repayment of existing Company obligations. The Shares are not being registered under the Securities Act and will be “restricted securities” under the Securities Act and will generally be subject to a minimum holding period of six months under Rule 144 before the Shares may be resold. The Shares will be offered and sold only to existing stockholders of record of the Company as of February 28, 2024 (the “Record Date”).  Each qualifying stockholder will be permitted to purchase up to his, her or its pro rata share of the Shares in the Equity Offering, based on the amount of shares of Common Stock owned by such stockholder as of the Record Date, in an amount equal to up to one hundred and eight and one-half percent (108.5%) of the number of shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by such stockholder as of the Record Date. The Equity Offering commenced on or about February 28, 2024, and will remain open for a period of thirty (30) calendar days ending on March 29, 2024 (the “Subscription Deadline”). The Shares will be offered and sold pursuant to a Subscription Agreement (the “Subscription Agreement”) to be entered into by and between the WCCompany and each subscribing stockholder. In connection with the Equity Offering, the Company has entered into a standby purchase agreement dated February 28, 2024 (the “SPA”) with BARC Investments, LLC (“BARC”), an affiliate of the Company owned and controlled by Company directors Alessandra F. Bianco and Richard A. Bianco, Jr.  Under the terms of the SPA, BARC has agreed to act as standby a purchaser for all of the shares of common stock being offered in the Equity Offering that are not otherwise subscribed to by other stockholders prior to the Subscription Deadline.  Additional information about the Equity Offering, including the material terms and conditions of the Equity Offering and information about how stockholders may subscribe for Shares in the Equity Offering, including the form of Subscription Agreement, are distinct fromset forth in the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on February 28, 2024.

The Company’s Chairman, President and Chief Executive Office, Mr. Richard A. Bianco (“R.A. Bianco”) has indicated that, if and when needed, he would provide a working capital line of credit agreement for the 111 West 57th Property as noted herein and as discussed in Part II – Item 8 – Note 4to the Company's consolidated financial statementsCompany on an as needed basis, subject to customary and distinct frommarket terms and conditions to be agreed upon at such time, until such time as the Litigation Funding AgreementEquity Offering has been completed. However, there can be no assurance that the Equity Offering will be completed within the timeframe contemplated or at all. As of December 31, 2023, Mr. R.A. Bianco provided loans to the Company in the amounts as noted hereinaggregating $3,198,000. In January, February and as discussed in March 2024, Mr. R.A. Bianco provided additional loan(s) to the Company. For additional information, seePart II – Item 8 – Note 10 to the Company'sCompany’s consolidated financial statements.


In 2017, the Company entered into a Litigation Funding Agreement (the “LFA”) with Mr. R.A. Bianco. Pursuant to the LFA, Mr. R.A. Bianco agreed to provide litigation funding to the Company, to satisfy actual documented litigation costs and expenses of the Company, including attorneys’ fees, expert witness fees, consulting fees and disbursements in connection with the Company’s legal proceedings related to the Company’s equity investment in the 111 West 57th Property. In 2019, the Company and Mr. R.A. Bianco entered into an amendment to the LFA (the “Amendment). For additional information including the terms of the Litigation Funding Agreement, as amended by the Amendment, see Part II – Item 8 – Note 9 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

For the year ended December 31, 2017,2023, cash of $4,166,000$3,469,000 was used by operations for the payment of operating expenses.  The cash needs of the Company in 2017 were satisfied by loans from Mr. R. A. Biancoexpenses and proceeds from Mr. R. A. Bianco pursuant to the Litigation Funding Agreement as noted above and the Company's financial resources.prior year accruals.


For the year ended December 31, 2016,2022, cash of $2,980,000$2,654,000 was used by operations for the payment of operating expenses.  The cash needs of the Company in 2016 were principally satisfied by the Company's financial resources.expenses and prior year accruals.

In March 2017, the Company and Mr. R. A. Bianco, entered into an agreement for Mr. R. A. Bianco to provide to the Company a financial commitment in the form of a line of credit up to ten million dollars ($10,000,000) or additional amount(s) as may be necessary and agreed to enable AmBase to contribute capital to Investment LLC and/or other affiliated subsidiaries of the Company to meet capital calls for the of 111 West 57th Property if and when the case may be necessary on terms agreeable to/by the Company (as determined by the independent members of the Board of Directors) and R. A. Bianco at such time. The agreement provides that additional borrowings from Mr. R. A. Bianco pursuant to this line of credit shall be secured by the Company's commercial office building in Greenwich, Connecticut. As a result of the sale of the Company's commercial office building in Greenwich CT. in January 2018, any borrowings from Mr. R.A. Bianco under this line of credit would be unsecured. A copy of such agreement is filed as an exhibit to the Company's current and previously filed periodic filings.


Accounts payable and accrued liabilities as of December 31, 2017,2023, increased fromas compared to December 31, 2016,2022. The amounts in the respective years are principally as a result of current periodrelated to accruals for legal expenses in connection with the 111 West 57th Property legal proceeding, which were paid in 2018, including accrued interest expenseproceedings.

Loan(s) payable – related party was $3,198,000 as of December 31, 2023, compared to $0 as of December 31, 2022, relating to loans made to the loan payable Company from Mr. R.A. Bianco, for working capital. For additional information, see Part II – Item 8 – Note 10 to Mr. R. A. Bianco.the Company’s consolidated financial statements.


There are no material commitments for capital expenditures as of December 31, 2017.2023.  Inflation has had no material impact on the business and operations of the Company.


RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


The Company recorded a net loss of $48,057,000$5,271,000 or $1.18$0.13 per share for the year ended December 31, 2017.2023.  For the year ended December 31, 2016,2022, the Company recorded a net loss of $3,219,000$3,473,000 or $0.08$0.09 per share.  The net loss for the full year period ended December 31, 2017 includes a $63,745,000 impairment of the Company's equity investment in the 111 West 57th Property as further discussed herein and in Part II – Item 8 – Note 4 and Note 9 to the Company's consolidated financial statements, offset by a net income tax benefit of $20,086,000 due to the recognition of a deferred tax asset  resulting from the recognition of AMT Credit carryforwards potentially refundable as provided for in the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act as further discussed in Part II – Item 8 – Note 8 to the Company's consolidated financial statements.


Compensation and benefits decreased to $1,214,000$1,378,000 in 20172023 from $1,239,000$1,410,000 in 2016.2022.  The decreased amountdecrease in 20172023 as compared to 20162022 is primarily due to a slight decrease in certain benefit expensescosts in 20172023 versus 2016.  No stock based compensation expense was recorded for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.2022.


Professional and outside services expenses increased to $2,628,000$3,298,000 in 20172023 from $1,123,000$1,668,000 in 2016.2022.  The increase in 20172023 as compared to 20162022 is principally the result of a higher level of legal and professional fees incurred in 20172023 in connection with the Company'sCompany’s legal proceedings relating to the Company'sCompany’s investment in the 111 West 57th Property.  Included in professional and outside services are legal expenses attributable to the Litigation Funding Agreement aggregating $1,510,000 for the full year period ended December 31, 2017; see Part II – Item 8 – Note 10 to the Company's consolidated financial statements forFor additional information including terms ofregarding the Litigation Funding Agreement.

Property operating and maintenance expenses decreased slightly to $117,000 in 2017 from $134,000 in 2016.  The decrease is primarily due to a general decrease in costs and a lower level of repair and maintenance expenses in 2017 versus 2016. With the sale of the Company's commercial office building in Greenwich, Connecticut in January 2018, the Company anticipates that property operating and maintenance expenses will decrease in 2018 compared with prior years.

Insurance expenses decreased to $159,000 in 2017, compared with $170,000 in 2016.  The decrease is primarily due to a decrease in insurance coverage levels and insurance premium costs.

Other operating expenses decreased to $140,000 in 2017 compared with $200,000 in 2016 due to decreased Delaware franchise taxes resulting from the lower authorized share base in 2017 versus 2016 and a general lower level of expenses in 2017 versus 2016.

Interest expense of $67,000 for the year ended December 31, 2017, represents accrued interest expense on the loan payable to Mr. R. A. Bianco which is included in accrued liabilities in the Company's consolidated balance sheet.  See Part II – Item 8 – Note 12 to the Company's consolidated financial statements for further information.

Other income of $128,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016 is attributable to a gain on the sale of an interest in a real estate investment that was sold in July 2016.

Despite ongoing litigation challenging the legitimacy of the actions taken by the Sponsors and Spruce in connection with the Company'sCompany’s investment in the 111 West 57th Property as further discussed herein and in the legal proceedings related thereto, seePart II - Item 8 – Note 43 and Note 9 8to the Company'sCompany’s consolidated financial statements,statements.

Property operating and maintenance expenses were $17,000 in accordance2023 and $17,000 in 2022.

Insurance expenses increased to $259,000 in 2023, compared with GAAP, the Company recorded$257,000 in 2022.  The increase is primarily due to an impairmentincrease in insurance premium costs.

Other operating expenses increased slightly to $79,000 in 2023 compared with $72,000 in 2022 due to a general higher level of its equity investmentexpenses in the 111 West 57th Property of $63,745,000 for the full year period ended December 31, 2017.2023 versus 2022.

Interest income in 2023 decreased to $2,000 compared to $9,000 in 2022. The Company is and will continue to pursue the recovery of its asset value from various sources of recovery; however, there can be no assurance that the Company will prevail with respect to any of its claims.

Equitydecreased interest income (loss) - 111 West 57th Partners of $25,000 for the year ended December 31, 2017, represents the Company's share of the 111 West 57th Partners' loss for the year to date period ended June 30, 2017.  Equity income (loss) - 111 West 57th Partners of $575,000 in 2016 represents the Company's share of the 111 West 57th Partners' loss for the year ended December 31, 2016.  The equity loss for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 is due to salesa lower levels of cash equivalents on hand in 2023 versus 2022.

Interest expense was $241,000 and marketing expenses incurred.$57,000 in 2023 and 2022, respectively. Interest expense for 2023 was attributable to interest expense to a professional firm for outstanding and unpaid professional fees and interest expense relating to the loans payable – related party.  For additional information see Part II – Item 8 – Note 10 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Interest expense for 2022 is attributable to interest expense paid to a professional firm for outstanding and unpaid professional fees.


For the year ended December 31, 2017,2023, the Company recorded an income tax benefitexpense of $20,092,000, partially offset by a $6,000 state tax expense,$1,000 attributable to a provision for a tax on capital imposed by the state jurisdictions. The income tax benefit for the year ended December 31, 2017, is attributable to a release of a valuation allowance in relation to the AMT Credit carryforwards and resulting deferred tax asset due to recognition of AMT Credit carryforwards projected to be refundable as provided for in the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act as further discussed in For additional information see Part II – Item 8 – Note 8 7 to the Company'sCompany’s consolidated financial statements.

For the year ended December 31, 2016,2022, the Company recorded an income tax benefitexpense of $142,000.  The income$1,000 attributable to a provision for a tax benefit foron capital imposed by the year ended December 31, 2016 is related state jurisdictions.  For additional information, see Part II – Item 8 – Note 7 to current year and prior year state tax true-ups.the Company’s consolidated financial statements.


A reconciliation between income taxes computed at the statutory federal rate and the provision for income taxes is included in Part II - Item 8 – Note 87 to the Company'sCompany’s consolidated financial statements. For additional information including a discussion of income tax matters, see Part II – Item 8 – Note 87 to the Company'sCompany’s consolidated financial statements.


APPLICATION OF CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIESESTIMATES


Our consolidated financial statements are based on the selection and application of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which require us to make estimates and assumptions about future events that affect the amounts reported in our financial statements and the accompanying notes. Future events and their effects cannot be determined with absolute certainty. The determination of estimates requires the exercise of judgment. Actual results could differ from those estimates, and any such differences may be material to the consolidated financial statements. We believe that the following accounting policies, which are important to our consolidated financial position and consolidated results of operations, require a higher degree of judgment and complexity in their application and represent the critical accounting policiesestimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. If different assumptions or conditions were to prevail, the results could be materially different from our reported results. For a summary of all our accounting policies, including the accounting policiesestimates discussed below, see Part II - Item 8 - Note 2 to the Company'sCompany’s consolidated financial statements.


Equity Method Investment:  Investments and ownership interests are accounted for under the equity method of accounting if the Company has the ability to exercise significant influence, but not control (under GAAP), over the investment. Investments accounted for under the equity method are carried at cost, plus or minus the Company's equity in the increases and decreases in the net assets after the date of acquisition and certain other adjustments. The Company's share of income or loss for equity method investments is recorded in the consolidated statements of operations as equity income (loss).  Dividends received, if any, would reduce the carrying amount of the Company's investment.

Legal Proceedings:  From time to time the Company and its subsidiaries may be named as a defendant in various lawsuits or proceedings. At the current time, except as set forth in Part II - Item 8 - Note 9 to the Company's consolidated financial statements, the Company is unaware of any legal proceedings pending against the Company. Management of the Company, in consultation with outside legal counsel, continually reviews the likelihood of liability and associated costs of pending and threatened litigation including the basis for the calculation of any litigation reserves which may be necessary. The assessment of such reserves includes an exercise of judgment and is a matter of opinion. The Company intends to aggressively contest all threatened litigation and contingencies, as well as pursue all sources for contributions to settlements. For a discussion of lawsuits and proceedings, see Part II - Item 8 - Note 9 to the Company's consolidated financial statements.

Income Tax Audits:  The Company's federal, state and local tax returns, from time to time, may be audited by the tax authorities, which could result in proposed assessments or a change in the net operating loss ("NOL") carryforwards and of alternative minimum tax ("AMT") Credits currently available.  In connection with the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") examination of the Company's 2012 federal income tax return, the IRS accepted the Company's federal NOL loss carryforward deductions from 1997 through 2006 which were utilized as part of the Company's 2012 federal income tax return to reduce the Company's 2012 federal taxable income.  The Company has not been notified of any other potential tax audits by any federal, state or local tax authorities.  As such, the Company believes the statutes of limitations for the assessment of additional federal and state tax liabilities are generally closed for tax years prior to 2014.

Deferred Tax Assets:  As of December 31, 20172023, and 2016,2022, the Company had deferred tax assets arising primarily from net operating loss carryforwards available to offset taxable income in future periods and AMT Credit carryforwards. As of December 31, 2017 a valuation allowance was released in relation to the AMT Credit carryforwards which are projected to be refundable as part of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act enacted in December 2017.periods.  A valuation allowance remains on the remaining deferred tax asset amounts relating to the NOL carryforwards as management has no basis to conclude that realization is more likely than not. The valuation allowance was calculated in accordance with current standards, which places primary importance on a company'scompany’s cumulative operating results for the current and preceding years. We intend to maintain a valuation allowance for the deferred tax asset amount relating to the NOL carryforwards until sufficient positive evidence exists to support a reversal. See Part II - Item 8 - Note 8 7 to the Company'sCompany’s consolidated financial statements.


The 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the "2017 Tax Act") was enacted in December 2017 and includes a broad range
12

Table of tax reforms, certain of which were required by GAAP to be recognized upon enactment. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has issued Staff Accounting Bulletin 118 (SAB 118), which provides guidance on accounting for the tax effects of the 2017 Tax Act. SAB 118 provides a measurement period that should not extend beyond one year from the enactment date for companies to complete the accounting under ASC 740. In accordance with SAB 118, a company must reflect the income tax effects of those aspects of the Act for which the accounting under ASC 740 is complete. To the extent that a company's accounting for certain income tax effects of the 2017 Tax Act is incomplete but it is able to determine a reasonable estimate, it must record a provisional estimate in the financial statements. If a company cannot determine a provisional estimate to be included in the financial statements, it should continue to apply ASC 740 on the basis of the provisions of the tax laws that were in effect immediately before the enactment of the 2017 Tax Act.Contents

New Accounting Pronouncements: There are no new accounting pronouncements that would likely materially affect the Company's financial statements for the periods reported herein.

Cautionary Statement for Forward-Looking Information


This Annual Report together with other statements and information publicly disseminated by the Company may contain certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Act"“Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"“Exchange Act”), or make oral statements that constitute forward lookingforward-looking statements. The Company intends such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, many of which cannot be predicted or quantified. The forward-looking statements may relate to such matters as anticipated financial performance, future revenues or earnings, business prospects, projected ventures, anticipated market performance, anticipated litigation results or the timing of pending litigation, and similar matters. When used in this Annual Report, the words "estimates," "expects," "anticipates," "believes," "plans," "intends"“estimates,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “plans,” “intends” and variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties.  The Company cautions readers that a variety of factors could cause the Company'sCompany’s actual results to differ materially from the anticipated results or other expectations expressed in the Company'sCompany’s forward-looking statements.  These risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond the Company'sCompany’s control, include, but are not limited to those set forth in "Item“Item 1A, Risk Factors"Factors” and elsewhere in this Annual Report and in the Company'sCompany’s other public filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission including, but not limited to: (i) risks with regard to the ability of the Company to continue as a going concern; (ii) assumptions regarding the outcome of legal and/or tax matters, based in whole or in part upon consultation with outside advisors; (iii) risks arising from unfavorable decisions in tax, legal and/or other proceedings; (iv) transaction volume in the securities markets; (v) the volatility of the securities markets; (vi) fluctuations in interest rates; (vii) risks inherent in the real estate business, including, but not limited to, insurance risks, tenant defaults, risks associated with real estate development activities, changes in occupancy rates or real estate values; (viii) changes in regulatory requirements which could affect the cost of doing business; (ix) general economic conditions; (x) risks with regard to whether or not the Company'sCompany’s current financial resources will be adequate to fund operations over the next twelve months from financial statement issuance date and/or continue operations;operations and whether the Company will be able to complete the Equity Offering within the timeframe contemplated or at all; (xi) changes in the rate of inflation and the related impact on the securities markets; and (xii) changes in federal and state tax laws and (xiii) additionally,laws.  Additionally, there is risk relating to assumptions regarding the outcome of tax matters, based in whole or in part upon consultation with outside advisors; risk relating to potential unfavorable decisions in tax proceedings; risks regarding changes in, and/or interpretations of federal and state income tax laws; and risk of IRS and/or state tax authority assessment of additional tax plus interest. These are not the only risks that we face. There may be additional risks that we do not presently know of or that we currently believe are immaterial which could also impair our business and financial position.


Undue reliance should not be placed on these forward-looking statements, which are applicable only as of the date hereof. The Company undertakes no obligation to revise or update these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that arise after the date of this Annual Report or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. Accordingly, there is no assurance that the Company'sCompany’s expectations will be realized.


ITEM 8.CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
ITEM 8.CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM (PCAOB ID 688)


To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
AmBase Corporation and Subsidiaries


Opinion on the Financial Statements


We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of AmBase Corporation and Subsidiaries (the "Company"“Company”) as of December 31, 20172023 and 2016,2022, the related consolidated statements of operations,, changes in stockholders'stockholders’ equity (deficit) and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2023, and the related notes and financial statement schedule listed in the index at item 15(collectively(collectively referred to as the "financial statements"“financial statements”).  In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 20172023 and 2016,2022, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2023, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.


Explanatory Paragraph – Going Concern


The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As more fully described in Note 1, the Company has a significant working capital deficiency, has incurred significant losses and needs to raise additional funds to meet its obligations and sustain its operations. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company'sCompany’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management'sManagements plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 1. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.


Basis for Opinion


These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company'sCompany’s management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company'sCompany’s financial statements based on our audits.  We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB"(“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.


We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB.  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud.  The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company'sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.


Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.


Critical Audit Matters

Critical audit matters are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. We determined that there are no critical audit matters.

/s/ Marcum LLPllp
Marcum LLP


We have served as the Company'sCompany’s auditor since 2007, such date takes into account the acquisition of a portion of UHY LLP by Marcum LLP in April 2010.


New Haven, Connecticut
March 30, 2018


Hartford, Connecticut
March 18, 2024


AMBASE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Operations


(in thousands, except per share data)
 Years Ended December 31,
 2017 2016
Operating expenses:   
Compensation and benefits$1,214 $1,239
Professional and outside services 2,628  1,123
Property operating and maintenance 117  134
Depreciation 48  48
Insurance 159  170
Other operating 140  200
Total operating expenses 4,306  2,914
Operating income (loss) (4,306)  (2,914)
      
Interest income -  -
Interest expense (67)  -
Other income -  128
Impairment of equity investment in 111 West 57th Partners LLC (63,745)  -
Equity income (loss) – 111 West 57th Partners LLC
 (25)  (575)
Income (loss) before income taxes (68,143)  (3,361)
      
Income tax expense (benefit) (20,086)  (142)
Net income (loss) (48,057)  (3,219)
      
Net income (loss) per common share - basic$(1.18) $(0.08)
      
      
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic
 40,738  40,738


  Years Ended December 31, 
  2023
  2022
 
Operating expenses:      
Compensation and benefits $1,378  $1,410 
Professional and outside services  3,298   1,668 
Property operating and maintenance  17   17 
Insurance  259   257 
Other operating  79   72 
Total operating expenses  5,031   3,424 
Operating income (loss)  (5,031)  (3,424)
         
Interest income  2   9 
Interest expense  (241)  (57)
Income (loss) before income taxes  (5,270)  (3,472)
         
Income tax expense (benefit)  1   1 
Net income (loss) $(5,271) $(3,473)
         
Net income (loss) per common share - basic $(0.13) $(0.09)
         
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic
  40,738   40,738 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.



AMBASE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Balance Sheets


(in thousands, except per share data)


Assets: December 31, 2017  December 31, 2016 
Cash and cash equivalents $70  $586 
Real estate owned:        
Land  554   554 
Buildings  1,900   1,900 
Real estate owned, gross  2,454   2,454 
Less:  accumulated depreciation  822   774 
         
Real estate owned, net  1,632   1,680 
         
Investment in 111 West 57th Partners LLC
  -   63,770 
Deferred tax asset  20,092   - 
Other assets  84   166 
Total assets $21,878  $66,202 
         
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity:        
Liabilities:        
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities $426  $343 
Loans payable - related party  2,296   - 
Other liabilities  -   - 
         
Total liabilities  2,722   343 
         
Litigation funding agreement (Note 10)  1,354   - 
Commitments and contingencies (Note 11)        
         
Stockholders' equity:        
Common stock ($0.01 par value, 85,000 authorized in 2017 and 85,000 authorized in 2016, 46,410 issued and 40,738 outstanding in 2017 and 46,410 issued and 40,738 outstanding in 2016)  464   464 
Additional paid-in capital  548,304   548,304 
Accumulated deficit  (525,798)  (477,741)
Treasury stock, at cost – 2017 - 5,672 shares; 2016 - 5,672 shares  (5,168)  (5,168)
Total stockholders' equity  17,802   65,859 
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $21,878  $66,202 
Assets: 
December 31,
2023
  
December 31,
2022
 
Cash and cash equivalents $78  $349 
         
Other assets  -   61 
Total assets $78  $410 
         
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit):
        
Liabilities:        
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities $3,225  $1,484 
Loan(s) payable – related party
  3,198   -
 
         
Total liabilities  6,423   1,484 
Commitments and contingencies (Note 6)  
    
         
Stockholders’ equity (deficit):
        
Common stock ($0.01 par value, 85,000 authorized in 2023 and 85,000 authorized in 2022, 46,410 issued and 40,738 outstanding in 2023 and 46,410 issued and 40,738 outstanding in 2022)
  464   464 
Additional paid-in capital  548,304   548,304 
Accumulated deficit  (549,945)  (544,674)
Treasury stock, at cost – 2023 - 5,672 shares; and 2022 - 5,672 shares
  (5,168)  (5,168)
Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)
  (6,345)  (1,074)
         
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity (deficit)
 
$
78
  
$
410
 


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.



AMBASE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders'Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)
Years Ended December 31, 20172023 and 20162022

($ in thousands, except per share data) 
Common
stock
  
Additional
paid-in capital
  Accumulated deficit  Treasury stock  Total 
January 1, 2016 $464  $548,304  $(474,522) $(5,168) $69,078 
                     
Net income (loss)  -   -   (3,219)  -   (3,219)
                     
December 31, 2016  464   548,304   (477,741)  (5,168)  65,859 
                     
Net income (loss)  -   -   (48,057)  -   (48,057)
December 31, 2017 $464  $548,304  $(525,798) $(5,168) $17,802 
(in thousands) 
Common
stock
  
Additional
paid-in
capital
  
Accumulated
deficit
  
Treasury
stock
  Total 
                
January 1, 2022 $464  $548,304  $(541,201) $(5,168) $2,399 
Net income (loss)  -   -   (3,473)  -   (3,473)
December 31, 2022  464   548,304   (544,674)  (5,168)  (1,074)
                     
Net income (loss)  -   -   (5,271)  -   (5,271)
December 31, 2023 $464  $548,304  $(549,945) $(5,168) $(6,345)


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.



AMBASE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows


 Years Ended December 31,  Years Ended December 31, 
(in thousands) 2017  2016  2023
  2022
 
            
Cash flows from operating activities:            
Net income (loss) $(48,057) $(3,219) $(5,271) $(3,473)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided (used) by operating activities                
Depreciation  48   48 
Other income  -   (128)
Impairment of equity investment in 111 West 57th Partners LLC  63,745   - 
Equity (income) loss – 111 West 57th Partners LLC
  25   575 
Deferred tax benefit  (20,092)  - 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:                
Other assets  82   (43)  61   19 
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities  83   (213)  1,741   800 
Other liabilities  -   - 
Net cash provided (used) by operating activities  (4,166)  (2,980)  (3,469)  (2,654)
                
Cash flows from investing activities:        
Proceeds from (investment in) real estate limited partnership  -   263 
Net cash provided (used) by investing activities  -   263 
        
Cash flows from financing activities:                
Proceeds from loans payable - related party  2,296   - 
Proceeds from litigation funding agreement  1,354   - 
Proceeds from loan(s) payable – related party
  3,198
   -
 
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities  3,650   -   3,198
   -
 
                
Net change in cash and cash equivalents  (516)  (2,717)  (271)  (2,654)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year  586   3,303   349   3,003 
        
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year $70  $586  $78  $349 
Supplemental cash flow disclosure:                
Income taxes paid $16  $103 
Income taxes refunded (paid) $-  $- 
Interest expense paid on accounts payable
 $155  $57 


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.



AMBASE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


Note 1 – Organization and Going Concern


AmBase Corporation (the "Company"“Company” or "AmBase"“AmBase”) is a Delaware corporation that was incorporated in 1975.  AmBase is a holding company.

At December 31, 2017,2023, the Company'sCompany’s assets consisted primarily of cash and cash equivalents, real estate owned and a deferred tax asset. On January 26, 2018, the Company sold its commercial office building in Greenwich, Connecticut, see Note 3 herein for additional information. See Note 8 for additional information regarding taxes.equivalents. The Company is engaged in the management of its assets and liabilities.

In June 2013, the Company purchased an equity interest in a real estate development property through a joint venture agreement to purchase and develop real property located at 105 through 111 West 57th Street in New York, New York (the "111 West 57th Property"). The Company has also made significant investments in the 111 West 57th Street Property in 2013, 2014 and 2015. The Company is engaged in material disputes and litigation with the sponsors of the joint venture (the "Sponsor") and a mezzanine lender to the joint venture ("Spruce"). On August 30, 2017, Spruce issued a Notice of Retention of Pledged Collateral in Full Satisfaction of Indebtedness. By purporting to accept the pledged collateral, pursuant to a Strict Foreclosure process, Spruce claims to have completed the retention of the collateral pledged by the junior mezzanine borrower, and therefore, the Company's interest in the 111 West 57th Street Property. The Company recorded an impairment of its equity investment in the 111 West 57th Property in the full year period ended December 31, 2017. The carrying value of the Company's equity investment in the 111 West 57th Property represented a substantial portion of the Company's assets and net equity value.

As noted above, despite ongoing litigation challenging the legitimacy of the actions taken by the Sponsors and Spruce in connection with the Company's investment in the 111 West 57th Property as further discussed herein, in accordance with GAAP, the Company recorded an impairment of its equity investment in the 111 West 57th Property in the full year period ended December 31, 2017. The Company is and will continue to pursue the recovery of its asset value from various sources of recovery; however, there can be no assurance that the Company will prevail with respect to any of its claims. For additional information with regard to the Company's legal proceedings related to the 111 West 57th Property, see Note 4 and Note 9 herein.

The Company has an appeal pending on its challenge to the Strict Foreclosure, which has not yet been resolved. The Company is currently attempting to have the Appellate Division declare the Strict Foreclosure invalid and to enjoin the Strict Foreclosure. The Company moved for a stay or injunctive relief pending appeal, and that motion was denied by the appellate court on January 18, 2018. See Note 4 and Note 9 herein for additional information concerning the Company's pending appeal of its challenge to the Strict Foreclosure and the Company's recording of an impairment of its equity investment in the 111 West 57th Property.

A fundamental principle of the preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP is the assumption that an entity will continue in existence as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations and the realization of assets and settlement of liabilities occurring in the ordinary course of business. In accordance with this requirement, the Company has prepared its accompanying consolidated financial statements assuming the Company will continue as a going concern.


The Company has incurred operating losses and used cash for operating activities for the past several years. In June 2013, the Company purchased an equity interest in a real estate development property through a joint venture agreement to purchase and develop real property located at 105 through 111 West 57th Street in New York, New York (the "111 West 57th Property"). The Company has also made significant investments in the 111 West 57th Street Property in 2013, 2014 and 2015. The Company is engaged in material disputes and litigation with the sponsors of the joint venture (the "Sponsor") and a mezzanine lender to the joint venture ("Spruce"). The Company recorded an impairment of its equity investment in the 111 West 57th Property in the full year period ended December 31, 2017. See Note 4 and Note 9 to the Company's consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding this impairment charge and the legal proceedings relating to the Company's investment in the 111 West 57th Property.  The carrying value of the Company's equity investment in the 111 West 57th Property represented a substantial portion of the Company's assets and net equity value. The Company has an appeal pending on its challenge to the strict foreclosure which has not yet been resolved. The Company has continued to keep operating expenses at a reduced level; however, there can be no assurance that the Company'sCompany’s current level of operating expenses will not increase or that other uses of cash will not be necessary.  The Company believes that based on its current level of operating expenses, its currently availableexisting cash and financial resources together with the net proceeds from the sale of its commercial office building in Greenwich, Connecticut as further discussed in Note 3 herein,cash equivalents may not be sufficient to cover operating cash needs through the twelve month period from the financial statement reporting date. Based on the above factors, management determined there is substantial doubt about the Company'sCompany’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued. The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include adjustments to the carrying value of assets and liabilities, which might be necessary should the Company not continue in operation.


Over the next several months,In order to continue as a going concern, the Company will seekmust take steps to manage its current level of cash and cash equivalents, through various ways, including but not limited to, reducing operating expenses, possible asset sales and/raising additional capital through the sale of equity or debt securities or long term borrowings, which may include additional borrowings from affiliates of the Company, although this cannot be assured. In order to continue on a long-term basis, the Company must raise additional capital through the sale of assets or long term borrowings.reducing operating expenses, and seeking recoveries from various sources. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to sell any of its assetsadequately implement these cash management measures, in whole or attain suchin part or raise capital or obtain financing aton terms acceptable to the Company, if at all.

In September 2017, On February 28, 2024, the Company commenced an offering of common stock and entered into a securities purchase agreement with an affiliate of the Company as standby purchaser for the entire amount of securities being offered.  For additional information about this offering, including the material terms and conditions of the offering and information about how stockholders may subscribe for shares in the offering, including the form of subscription agreement to be entered into between the Company and Mr. Richard A. Bianco,subscribing stockholders, see Note 11.

In June 2013, the Company's Chairman, PresidentCompany purchased an equity interest in a real estate development property through a joint venture agreement to purchase and Chief Executive Officer ("R. A. Bianco"develop real property located at 105 through 111 West 57th Street in New York, New York (the “111 West 57th Property”) entered into an agreement pursuant. The Company is engaged in material disputes and litigation with regard to which Mr. R. A. Bianco will fund the Company's111 West 57th Property.  Despite ongoing litigation expenseschallenging the legitimacy of the actions taken in connection with the 111 West 57th Property (the "Litigation Funding Agreement").  For additional information including“Strict Foreclosure”, (as defined and as further discussed herein), the termsCompany recorded an impairment for the full amount of the Litigation Funding Agreement, see Note 10 herein.

With respect to its disputes and litigation relating to its interestequity investment in the 111 West 57th Property in 2017. Prior to the Company is continuing to pursue various legal courses of action, as well as considering other possible economic strategies, includingStrict Foreclosure, the possible salecarrying value of the Company's interest in and/or rights with respect to the 111 West 57th Property. The Company is continuing to pursue other options to realize the Company's investment value and/or protect its legal rights.

The Company can give no assurances regarding the outcome of the matters described herein, including as to the effect of Spruce's actions described herein, whether the Sponsors will perform their contractual commitments to the Company under the JV Agreement, as to what further action, if any, the lenders may take with respect to the project, as to the ultimate resolution of the ongoing litigation proceedings relating to the Company's investment interest in the 111 West 57th Property, as to the ultimate effect of the Sponsors', the Company's or the lenders' actions on the project, as to the completion or ultimate success of the project, or as to the value or ultimate realization of any portion of the Company'sCompany’s equity investment in the 111 West 57th Street Property. 57th Property represented a substantial portion of the Company’s assets and net equity value.

For additional information onregarding the Company'sCompany’s recording of an impairment of its equity investment in the 111 West 57th57th Property in 2017 and the Company'sCompany’s legal actions related thereto,proceedings relating to the 111 West 57th Property, including the Company’s challenge to the Strict Foreclosure, see Note 4 3 and Note 9.8.


While the Company'sCompany’s management is evaluating future courses of action to protect and/or recover the value of the Company'sCompany’s equity investment in the 111 West 57th57th Property, the adverse developments make it uncertain as to whether any such courses of action will be successful. Any such efforts are likely to require sustained effort over a period of time and require substantial additional financial resources. Inability to recover all or most of such value would, in all likelihood, have a material adverse effect on the Company'sCompany’s financial condition and future prospects.

In May 2016, the The Company and Mr. R. A. Bianco entered into an agreement for Mr. R. A. Biancocan give no assurances with regard if it will prevail with respect to provide to the Company a secured working capital line of credit. Pursuant to this agreement, Mr. Bianco has made several loans to the Company, for use as working capital. On January 26, 2018, in connection with the sale by the Companyany of its office building in Greenwich, Connecticut, the Company repaid the full amountclaims.

19

AMBASE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Mr. R. A. Bianco, and in connection therewith the working capital line of credit was terminated. For additional information, see Note 12 herein.Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies


Basis of Accounting


The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP"(“GAAP”).


Use of estimates


The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions, that it deems reasonable, that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from such estimates and assumptions.


Principles of consolidation


The consolidated financial statements are comprised of the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All material intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.


Equity method investment


Investments and ownership interests are accounted for under the equity method of accounting if the Company has the ability to exercise significant influence, but not control (under GAAP), over the investment. Investments accounted for under the equity method are carried at cost, plus or minus the Company'sCompany’s equity in the increases and decreases in the net assets after the date of acquisition and certain other adjustments. The Company'sCompany’s share of income or loss for equity method investments is recorded in the consolidated statements of operations as equity income (loss).  Dividends received, if any, would reduce the carrying amount of the Company'sCompany’s investment.


Cash and cash equivalents


Highly liquid investments, consisting principally of funds held in short-term money market accounts, with original maturities of less than three months, are classified as cash equivalents. The majority of the Company'sCompany’s cash and cash equivalents balances are maintained with a limited number of major financial institutions. Cash and cash equivalents balances at institutions may, at times, be above the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insured limit per account.


Income taxes


The Company and its domestic subsidiaries file a consolidated federal income tax return. The Company recognizes both the current and deferred tax consequences of all transactions that have been recognized in the consolidated financial statements, calculated based on the provisions of enacted tax laws, including the tax rates in effect for current and future years. Net deferred tax assets are recognized immediately when a more likely than not criterion is met; that is, a greater than 50% probability exists that the tax benefits will actually be realized sometime in the future.  For additional information including a discussion of income tax matters see Note 97.


The 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the "2017 Tax Act") was enacted in December 2017 and includes a broad range
20

AMBASE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to be recognized upon enactment. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has issued Staff Accounting Bulletin 118 (SAB 118), which provides guidance on accounting for the tax effects of the 2017 Tax Act. SAB 118 provides a measurement period that should not extend beyond one year from the enactment date for companies to complete the accounting under ASC 740. In accordance with SAB 118, a company must reflect the income tax effects of those aspects of the Act for which the accounting under ASC 740 is complete. To the extent that a company's accounting for certain income tax effects of the 2017 Tax Act is incomplete but it is able to determine a reasonable estimate, it must record a provisional estimate in the financial statements. If a company cannot determine a provisional estimate to be included in the financial statements, it should continue to apply ASC 740 on the basis of the provisions of the tax laws that were in effect immediately before the enactment of the 2017 Tax Act.Consolidated Financial Statements

Earnings per share


Basic earnings per share ("EPS"(“EPS”) excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. The Company has no stock options or securities outstanding which could be potentially dilutive outstanding.dilutive.

Stock-based compensation

Under the Company's 1993 Stock Incentive Plan (the "1993 Plan"), the Company may grant to officers and employees of the Company and its subsidiaries, stock options ("Options"), stock appreciation rights ("SARs"), restricted stock awards ("Restricted Stock"), merit awards ("Merit Awards") and performance share awards ("Performance Shares"), through May 28, 2018.  At the current time, the Company has decided not to extend the expiration date of the 1993 Plan.  A pre-determined number of shares of the Company's Common Stock are reserved for issuance under the 1993 Plan (upon the exercise of Options and Stock Appreciation Rights, upon awards of Restricted Stock and Performance Shares); however, only a portion of such shares shall be available for issuance for Restricted Stock Awards and Merit Awards. Shares issued pursuant to the 1993 Plan shall be authorized but unissued shares of Common Stock. Options may be granted as incentive stock options ("ISOs") intended to qualify for favorable tax treatment under Federal tax law or as nonqualified stock options ("NQSOs"). SARs may be granted with respect to any Options granted under the 1993 Plan and may be exercised only when the underlying Option is exercisable. The 1993 Plan requires that the exercise price of all Options and SARs be equal to or greater than the fair value of the Company's Common Stock on the date of grant of that Option. The term of any NQSO, ISO or related SAR cannot exceed terms under federal tax law and/or as prescribed in the 1993 Plan.  Subject to the terms of the 1993 Plan and any additional restrictions imposed at the time of grant, Options and any related SARs ordinarily will become exercisable pursuant to a vesting period prescribed at the time of grant.  In the case of a "Change of Control" of the Company (as defined in the 1993 Plan), options granted pursuant to the 1993 Plan may become fully exercisable as to all optioned shares from and after the date of such Change in Control in the discretion of the Committee or as may otherwise be provided in the grantee's Option agreement. Death, retirement, or absence for disability will not result in the cancellation of any Options.

Stock-based compensation expense for all stock-based compensation awards for which vesting is based solely on employment service, are based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.  The Company recognizes these compensation costs for only those shares expected to vest, on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award, which is generally the option vesting term.  Compensation expense relating to stock options is recorded in the Consolidated Statement of Operations, with a corresponding increase in additional paid-in capital in the Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders' Equity.  See Note 8 herein for a further discussion of stock-based compensation.

Depreciation

Depreciation expense for the Company's owned building is recorded on a straight-line basis over the useful lives of the assets.  Tenant improvements if any, would be depreciated over the lesser of the remaining life of the tenants' lease or the estimated useful lives of the improvements.  For additional information see Note 3.


New Accounting Pronouncements


There are no new accounting pronouncementsIn June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. This ASU and its related amendments (collectively, the “Credit Loss Standard”) modifies the impairment model to utilize an expected loss methodology in place of the incurred loss methodology for financial instruments, including trade receivables, contract assets and off-balance sheet credit exposures. The Credit Loss Standard requires consideration of a broader range of information to estimate expected credit losses, including historical information, current economic conditions, and a reasonable forecast period. This Credit Loss Standard requires that could materially affect the Company'sstatement of operations reflect estimates of expected credit losses for newly recognized financial assets as well as changes in the estimate of expected credit losses that have taken place during the period, which may result in earlier recognition of certain losses. We adopted this standard effective January 1, 2023, and this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.


Note 3 – Real Estate Owned

Real estate owned consists of a commercial office building in Greenwich, Connecticut that is managed and operated by the Company.  A portion of the building is utilized by the Company for office space; the remaining space was available for lease. Depreciation expense for the building is calculated on a straight-line basis. The building is carried at cost, net of accumulated depreciation.

Information relating to the Company's real estate owned in Greenwich, Connecticut is as follows:

December 31, 2017
Area of building in square feet14,500
Square feet utilized by Company3,500
Number of years depreciation is based upon39

On January 26, 2018, the Company sold its building in Greenwich, Connecticut, to Maria USA, Inc. an unaffiliated third party. A gain from the sale will be reflected in the Company's financial statements for the quarterly period ending March 31, 2018. The Company used the sale proceeds to repay the full amount of the working capital loan plus accrued interest to Mr. R. A. Bianco. See Note 12 for additional information. The remaining proceeds will be used for working capital.

Information relating to the sale of the Company's real estate owned in Greenwich, Connecticut is as follows:

(in thousands) Amounts 
Gross sales price $5,200 
Less: Transactions costs  (290)
Net cash proceeds  4,910 
Less: Real estate carrying value, (net of accumulated depreciation)  (1,632)
Net gain on sale of real estate $3,278 

Note 4 – Investment in 111 West 57th Partners LLC


In June 2013, the Company purchased an equity interest in a real estate development property through a joint venture agreement to purchase and develop real property located at 105 throughthe 111 West 57th Street in New York, New York (the "111 West 57th Property").Property.  The Company is engaged in material disputes and litigation with the sponsors of the joint venture (the "Sponsor") and a mezzanine lenderregard to the joint venture ("Spruce"). On August 30, 2017, Spruce issued a Notice of Retention of Pledged Collateral in Full Satisfaction of Indebtedness. By purporting to accept the pledged collateral, pursuant to a Strict Foreclosure process, Spruce claims to have completed the retention of the collateral pledged by the junior mezzanine borrower, and therefore, the Company's interest in the 111 West 57th Street57th Property. TheDespite ongoing litigation challenging the legitimacy of the actions taken in connection with the “Strict Foreclosure”, (as defined below and as further discussed herein), the Company recorded an impairment for the full amount of its equity investment in the 111 West 57th Property in 2017.

For additional information regarding the full year period ended December 31, 2017. The carrying value of the Company's equity investment in theCompany’s 111 West 57th Property represented a substantial portion of the Company's assets and net equity value.

As noted above, despite ongoing litigation challenging the legitimacy of the actions taken by the Sponsors and Spruce in connection with the Company's investment in the 111 West 57th Property as further discussed herein, in accordance with GAAP, the Company recorded an impairment of its equity investment, in the 111 West 57th Property in the full year period ended December 31, 2017. The Company is and will continue to pursue the recovery of its asset value from various sources of recovery; however, there can be no assurance that the Company will prevail with respect to any of its claims. For additional information with regard to the Company's legal proceedings related to the 111 West 57th Property, see Note 4 and Note 9 herein.

The Company has an appeal pending on its challengeevents leading up to the Strict Foreclosure, which has not yet been resolved. The Company is currently attempting to have the Appellate Division declare the Strict Foreclosure invalid and to enjoin the Strict Foreclosure. The Company moved for a stay or injunctive relief pending appeal, and that motion was denied by the appellate court on January 18, 2018. See Note 4 and Note 9 herein for additional information concerning the Company's pending appeal of its challenge to the Strict Foreclosure and the Company'sCompany’s recording of an impairment of its equity investment in the 111 West 57th Property.

See below for additional information with regardProperty and the Company’s legal proceedings relating to background information regarding the Company's 111 West 57th Property equity investment in the 111 West 57th Property, and events leading upincluding the Company’s challenge to the Strict Foreclosure, as follows:seeherein below and Note 8.


In June 2013, 111 West 57th Investment LLC ("(“Investment LLC"LLC”), a then newly formed subsidiary of the Company, entered into a joint venture agreement (as amended, the "JV Agreement"“JV Agreement”) with 111 West 57th Sponsor LLC (the "Sponsor"“Sponsor”), pursuant to which Investment LLC invested (the "Investment"“Investment”) in a real estate development property to purchase and develop the 111 West 57th Street Property (the "111 West 57th Property").Property.  In consideration for making the Investment, Investment LLC was granted a membership interest in 111 West 57th Partners LLC ("(“111 West 57th Partners"Partners”), which indirectly acquired the 111 West 57th Property on June 28, 2013 (the "Joint“Joint Venture," and such date, the "Closing Date"“Closing Date”).  The Company also indirectly contributed an additional amount to the Joint Venture in exchange for an additional indirect interest in the Joint Venture.  Other members and the Sponsor contributed additional cash and/or property to the Joint Venture. The Company recorded its investment in 111 West 57th Partners utilizing the equity method of accounting. The Joint Venture plans were to redevelop the 111 West 57th57th Property into a luxury residential tower and retail project.


Amounts relating to the Company'sCompany’s initial June 2013 investment and other information relating to the 111 West 57th Property is as follows:

($ in thousands)   
Company's aggregate initial investment $57,250 
Company's aggregate initial membership interest %  60.3%
Other members and Sponsor initial investment $37,750 
Approximate gross square feet of project  346,000 

See below for additional information with regard to background information regarding the Company's 111 West 57th Property equity investment in the 111 West 57th Property and events leading upfollow:

($ in thousands)   
Company’s aggregate initial investment $57,250 
Company’s aggregate initial membership interest %  60.3%

21

AMBASE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Strict Foreclosure, as follows:Consolidated Financial Statements

The JV Agreement and related operating agreements generally provide that all distributable cash shall be distributed as follows: (i) first, 100% to the members in proportion to their percentage interests until Investment LLC has received distributions yielding a 20% internal rate of return as calculated; (ii) second, 100% to the Sponsor as a return of (but not a return on) any additional capital contributions made by the Sponsor on account of manager overruns; and (iii) thereafter, (a) 50% to the members in proportion to their respective percentage interests at the time of such distribution, and (b) 50% to the Sponsor.

Additionally, the JV Agreement provides that (i) Mr. Richard A. Bianco (the Company's current Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer) ("Mr. R. A. Bianco"), his immediate family, and/or any limited liability company wholly-owned thereby, and/or a trust in which Mr. R. A. Bianco and/or his immediate family is the beneficiary, shall at all times own, in the aggregate, not less than 20% of the outstanding shares of AmBase; and (ii) Mr. R. A. Bianco shall remain the Chairman of the Board of Directors of AmBase for the duration of the JV Agreement.


In March 2014, the Company entered into an amended and restated operating agreement for Investment LLC (the "Amended“Amended and Restated Investment Operating Agreement"Agreement”) to grant a 10% subordinated participation interest in Investment LLC to the Company’s Chairman, President and Chief Executive Office, Mr. R.Richard A. Bianco (“Mr.R.A. Bianco”), as a contingent future incentive for Mr. R. A. Bianco'sR.A. Bianco’s past, current and anticipated ongoing role to develop and commercialize the Company'sCompany’s equity investment in the 111 West 57th57th Property.  Pursuant to the terms of the Amended and Restated Investment Operating Agreement, Mr. R.A. Bianco has no voting rights with respect to his interest in Investment LLC, and his entitlement to receive 10% of the distributions from Investment LLC is subject to the Company first receiving distributions equal to 150% of the Company'sCompany’s initial aggregate investment in Investment LLC and the Joint Venture, plus any additional investments by the Company,, and only with respect to any distributions thereafter. At the current time, the Company has not expensed nor accrued any amounts relating to this subordinated participation interest, as no amount or range of amounts can be reasonably estimated or assured.


During 2014, in connection with the funding of additional capital calls under the JV Agreement for required borrowing and development costs for the 111 West 57th Property, the Company'sCompany’s management and its Board of Directors concluded that, given the continuing development risks of the 111 West 57th Property and the Company'sCompany’s financial position, the Company should not at that time increase its already significant concentration and risk exposure to the 111 West 57th Property.  Nonetheless, the Company sought to limit dilution of its interest in the Joint Venture resulting from any failure to fund the capital call requirements, but at the same time wished to avoid the time, expense and financial return requirements (with attendant dilution and possible loss of voting rights) that obtaining a replacement third-party investor would require. The Company, therefore, entered into a second amended and restated operating agreement for Investment LLC ("(“Second Amended and Restated Investment Operating Agreement"Agreement”) pursuant to which Capital LLC was admitted as a member of Investment LLC. In exchange for Capital LLC contributing toward Investment LLC capital calls in respect of the 111 West 57th Property, available cash of Investment LLC will be distributed first to Capital LLC until it has received a 20% internal rate of return (calculated as provided for in the JV Agreement as noted above), second to the Company until it has received 150% of its capital, and;and, thereafter, available cash is split 10/90, with 10% going to Mr. R.A. Bianco as the subordinated participation interest noted above and 90% going to Capital LLC and the Company pari-passu, with Capital LLC receiving one-half of its pro-rata share based on capital contributed and the Company receiving the balance. No other material changes were made to the Amended and Restated Investment Operating Agreement, and neither Mr. R. A.R.A. Bianco nor Capital LLC has any voting rights with respect to their interest and investment in Investment LLC.


In accordance with the JV Agreement, Shortfall Capital Contributionsshortfall capital contributions may be treated either as a member loan or as a dilutive capital contribution byas set forth in the funding party valued at one and one-half times the amount actually contributed.JV Agreement. The SponsorsSponsor deemed the Shortfall Capital Contributionsshortfall capital contributions as dilutive capital contributions to the Company.  The Company disagrees with the Sponsors'Sponsor’s investment percentage calculations. The Sponsors haveSponsor has taken the position that the Capital Contribution Requests,capital contribution requests, if taken together, would have caused the Company'sCompany’s combined ownership percentage to be diluted to approximately 48%.below the Company’s initial membership interest percentage. The parties have a dispute with regard to the calculation of the revised investment percentages resulting from the Capital Contribution Requests,capital contribution requests, along with the treatment and allocation of these Shortfall Capital Contributionshortfall capital contribution amounts.


On June 30, 2015, 111 West 57th Partners obtained financing for the 111 West 57th Property.  The financing was obtained in two parts: (i) a first mortgage construction loan with AIG Asset Management (US), LLC (along with its affiliates "AIG"“AIG”); and (ii) a mezzanine loan with Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance, Inc. (along with its affiliates "Apollo"“Apollo”), as detailed herein below.herein.  Both loans have a four-yearinitially had certain repayment term dates with a one-year extension optionoption(s) subject to satisfying certain conditions.  The loan agreements (the "Loan Agreements"“Loan Agreements”) also include customary events of default and other customary terms and conditions.  Simultaneously with the closing of the AIG and the Apollo financing, 111 West 57th Partners repaid all outstanding liabilities and obligations to Annaly CRE, LLC under the initial mortgage and acquisition loan agreement, dated June 28, 2013, between the joint venture entities and Annaly CRE, LLC.  The remaining loan proceeds were to be drawn down and used as necessary for construction and related costs, loan interest escrow and other related project expenses for development of the 111 West 57th Property.


Information relating
22

AMBASE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the June 30, 2015 financing for 111 West 57th Partners is as follows:Consolidated Financial Statements

    
(in thousands)   
Financing obtained by 111 West 57th Partners - AIG
 $400,000 
Financing obtained by 111 West 57th Partners - Apollo
  325,000 
Annaly CRE LLC initial mortgage and acquisition loan repaid $230,000 

In April 2016, AmBasethe Company initiated a litigation in the New York State Supreme Court for New York County (the "NY Court"“NY Court”), Index NoNo. 652301/2016, ("(AmBase v. 111 West 57th Sponsor LLC, et al.") (the "111 West 57th Action"Sponsor Action”).  The defendants in that litigation areinclude 111 West 57th Sponsor LLC, 111 West 57th JDS LLC, PMG West 57th Street LLC, 111 West 57th Control LLC, 111 West 57th Developer LLC, Elliot Joseph, 111 West 57th KM Equity LLC, 111 West 57th KM Group LLC, Kevin Maloney, Matthew Phillips, Michael Stern, Ned White and Franklin R. Kaimanvarious members and affiliates, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, and Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company (collectively, "Defendants"“Defendants”) and nominal defendantdefendants 111 West 57th Partners LLC. AmBase alleges in that action, that Defendants violated multiple provisions in the JV Agreement, including by failing to honor the exercise of AmBase's contractual "equity put right" as set forth in the JV Agreement (the "Equity Put Right").AmBase is seeking compensatory damages, as well as punitive damages, indemnification and equitable relief including a declaration of the parties' rights, and an accounting. The Company has also demanded from the Sponsor access111 West 57th Mezz 1 LLC.  For additional information with regard to the books and records forCompany’s legal proceedings relating to the 111 West 57th Property, which the Sponsor refused, claiming they have provided all books and records as required. The Defendants filed motions to dismiss, and on January 12, 2018, the NY Court issued an opinion allowing some of AmBase's claims to go forward and dismissing others. Among other claims that the NY Court declined to dismiss was AmBase's claim that the Defendants violated the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing by frustrating AmBase's Equity Put Right by declining to produce a timely budget. Claims that the NY Court dismissed included AmBase's claim that the Defendants breached their contract with AmBase by financing capital contributions for the project through funds obtained from third parties. On January 16, 2018, some of the Defendants wrote to the NY Court suggesting that the opinion contained certain clerical errors and was missing a page. On January 18, 2018, the NY Court removed its previous opinion from the docket and on January 29, 2018, posted a revised opinion. A discovery conference in this case is was held on February 27, 2018. For additional information, see Note 9.8.


In December 2016, the Sponsor proposed for approval a "proposed budget"“proposed budget” (the "Proposed Budget"“Proposed Budget”), which the Sponsor claims representedreflected an increase to the aggregate of hard cost line items of an amount slightly below the Equity Put Right threshold amount and a further increase in other costs thus resulting in the need for additional funding in order to complete the project. The Company disputes, among other items, the calculation of the percentage increase of hard costs shown in the Proposed Budget. The Company believes the aggregate projected hard costs in the Proposed Budget exceed a contractually stipulated limit as a percentage of the hard costs set forth in the prior approved budget, thus allowing Investment LLC the option to exercise its Equityequity put right as set forth in the JV Agreement (the “Equity Put Right.Right”). Consequently, subsequent to the Sponsors'Sponsor’s presentation of the Proposed Budget, Investment LLC notified the Sponsor that it was exercising its Equity Put Right pursuant to the JV Agreement. The Sponsor refused to honor the exercise of Investment LLC'sLLC’s Equity Put Right. The Sponsor claims, among other things, that the conditions precedent were not met inbecause it claims that the increase in aggregate hard costs in the Proposed Budget does not exceed the contractually stipulated limit that would allow the exercise of the Equity Put Right.


The Company further contends that a portion of the Proposed Budget increases should beare manager overruns (as defined in the JV Agreement) and thus should be paid for by the Sponsor. The Sponsor denies that the Proposed Budget increases were manager overruns. The Company continues to challenge the nature and substance of the Proposed Budget increases and how they should be treated pursuant to the JV Agreement.

In March 2017, the Company and Mr. R. A. Bianco entered into an agreement for Mr. R. A. Bianco to provide to the Company a financial commitment in the form of a line of credit up to ten million dollars ($10,000,000) or additional amount(s) as may be necessary and agreed to enable AmBase to contribute capital to Investment LLC and/or other affiliated subsidiaries of the Company to meet capital calls for the of 111 West 57th Property if and when the case may be necessary on terms agreeable to/by the Company (as determined by the independent members of the Board of Directors) and Mr. R. A. Bianco at such time.  The agreement provides that additional borrowings from Mr. R. A. Bianco pursuant to this line of credit shall be secured by the Company's commercial office building in Greenwich, Connecticut. As a result of the sale of the Company's commercial office building in Greenwich CT. in January 2018, any borrowings from Mr. R.A. Bianco under this line of credit would be unsecured.


The Sponsor claimed that additional borrowings of $60 million to $100 million were needed to complete the project. In addition,Shortly thereafter, the Company had beenSponsor informed by the Sponsors,Company that Apollo had indicated that due to budget increases, it believed the current loan had been "outwas “out of balance"balance” (meaning, according to Apollo, the projected budget exceeds the original budget approved in connection with the loan); and thus 111 West 57th Partners LLC, ("111 West 57th Partners"), or its subsidiaries would need additional funding in order to bring the loan back into balance. The Company considered approving the additional financing but informed the Sponsor that it had concerns about the Proposed Budget and the implications of the Proposed Budget, as well as other questions which needed to be addressed first.

Around this time, Apollo had previously provided loan forbearances to the borrowers and guarantors in order to allow the Sponsor time (while the building continued to be built) to raise the additional financing that itSponsor claimed would be needed in order to complete the 111 West 57th project. This forbearance period ended on June 29, 2017. Around this date, the Company was advised that Apollo sold $25 milliona portion of the mezzanine loan—broken off as a junior mezzanine loan—to an affiliate of Spruce Capital Partners LLC ("Spruce"(“Spruce”) (the "Junior“Junior Mezzanine Loan"Loan”).


On June 30, 2017, Spruce declared an event of default under the Junior Mezzanine Loan and demanded immediate payment of the full outstanding balance of the Junior Mezzanine Loan.  Spruce then gave notice to the junior mezzanine borrower that it proposed to accept the pledged collateral (including the joint venture members'members’ collective interest in the property) in full satisfaction of the joint venture'sventure’s indebtedness under the Junior Mezzanine Loan (i.e., a "Strict Foreclosure"“Strict Foreclosure”).


On July 25, 2017, the Company filed a complaint against Spruce and the Sponsor and requested injunctive relief halting the Strict Foreclosure from the New York State Supreme Court for New York County, (the "NY Court"“NY Court”) Index No. 655031/2017,, (the "111 West 57th Spruce Action" (the “Lender Action”). The defendants in the 111 West 57th Spruce action areLender Action were 111 W57 Mezz Investor, LLC, Spruce Capital Partners LLC, 111 West 57th Sponsor LLC, Michael Z. Stern, and Kevin P. Maloney (collectively, "Defendants"“Defendants”) and nominal defendants 111 West 57th Partners LLC and 111 West 57th57th Mezz 1 LLC. The Company has since voluntarily discontinued its claims against Sponsor, Stern, and Maloney, without prejudice to reinstating them in the Lender Action or any other action. For additional information with regard to the Lender Action, see Note 8.


23

AMBASE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
On August 30, 2017, Spruce issued a Notice of Retention of Pledged Collateral in Full Satisfaction of Indebtedness. By purporting to accept the pledged collateral, pursuant to a Strict Foreclosure process, Spruce claims to have completed the retention of the collateral pledged by the junior mezzanine borrower, and therefore, the Company'sCompany’s interest in the 111 West 57th Street Property. TheProperty (the “Strict Foreclosure”). Despite ongoing litigation challenging the legitimacy of the actions taken in connection with the Strict Foreclosure, the Company recorded an impairment for the full amount of its equity investment in the 111 West 57th Property of $63,745,000, forin 2017. Prior to the full year period ended December 31, 2017. TheStrict Foreclosure, the carrying value of the Company'sCompany’s equity investment in the 111 West 57th Property represented a substantial portion of the Company'sCompany’s assets and net equity value.


The Company has an appeal pending on its
For additional information regarding the Company’s legal proceedings relating to the 111 West 57th Property, including the Company’s challenge to the Strict Foreclosure, which has not yet been resolved. The Company is currently attempting to have the Appellate Division declare the Strict Foreclosure invalid and to enjoin the Strict Foreclosure. The Company moved for a stay or injunctive relief pending appeal, and that motion was denied by the appellate court on January 18, 2018. Seesee Note 9 for additional information.8.

As noted above, despite ongoing litigation challenging the legitimacy of the actions taken by the Sponsor and Spruce in connection with the Company's investment in the 111 West 57th Property as further discussed herein, in accordance with GAAP, the Company recorded an impairment of its equity investment in the 111 West 57th Property in the full year period ended December 31, 2017. The Company is and will continue to pursue the recovery of its asset value from various sources of recovery; however, there can be no assurance that the Company will prevail with respect to any of its claims. For additional information with regard to the Company's legal proceedings related to the 111 West 57th Property, see Note 9.

For information relating to the Litigation Funding Agreement entered into between the Company and Mr. Richard A. Bianco, the Company's President and Chief Executive Officer, see Note 10.

With respect to its disputes and litigation relating to its interest in the 111 West 57th Property, the Company is continuingpursuing, and will continue to pursue, other options to realize the Company’s investment value, various legal courses of action to protect its legal rights, recovery of its asset value from various sources of recovery, as well as considering other possible economic strategies, including the possible sale of the Company'sCompany’s interest in and/or rights with respect to the 111 West 57th Property. TheProperty; however, there can be no assurance that the Company is continuingwill prevail with respect to pursue other options to realize the Company's investment value and/or protectany of its legal rights.claims.


The Company can give no assurances regarding the outcome of the matters described herein, including as to the effect of Spruce'sSpruce’s actions described herein, whether the Sponsor will perform their contractual commitments to the Company under the JV Agreement, as to what further action, if any, the lenders may take with respect to the project, as to the ultimate resolution of the ongoing litigation proceedings relating to the Company'sCompany’s investment interest in the 111 West 57th57th Property, as to the ultimate effect of the Sponsors',Sponsor’s, the Company'sCompany’s or the lenders'lenders’ actions on the project, as to the completion or ultimate success of the project, or as to the value or ultimate realization of any portion of the Company'sCompany’s equity investment in the 111 West 57th Street57th Property. For additional information on the Company's investment in the 111 West 57th Property and the Company's legal actions related thereto, see Note 9.


While the Company'sCompany’s management is evaluating future courses of action to protect and/or recover the value of the Company'sCompany’s equity investment in the 111 West 57th57th Property, the adverse developments make it uncertain as to whether any such courses of action will be successful. Any such efforts are likely to require sustained effort over a period of time and require substantial additional financial resources. Inability to recover all or most of such value would, in all likelihood, have a material adverse effect on the Company'sCompany’s financial condition and future prospects.

The Company recorded its investment in 111 West 57th Partners utilizing the equity method of accounting. Despite ongoing litigation challenging the legitimacy of the actions taken by the Sponsor and Spruce in connectioncan give no assurances with the Company's investment in the 111 West 57th Property as further discussed herein, in accordanceregard to if it will prevail with GAAP, the Company recorded an impairmentrespect to any of its equity investment in the 111 West 57th Property in the full year period ended December 31, 2017. As a result, the operations of 111 West 57th only through June 30, 2017 are included in the Company's consolidated statement of operations for the full year period ended December 31, 2017.claims.


As a result of the matters described herein, the following tables present summarized financial information for 111 West 57th Partners solely for the periods indicated.  The amounts shown represent 100% of the financial position and results of operations of 111 West 57th Partners for the dates indicated below.

(in thousands)
Assets: December 31, 2016 
Real estate held for development, net $563,133 
Escrow deposits  9,000 
Other assets  6,908 
Total assets 
$
579,041 
Liabilities:    
Loans payable $441,749 
Other liabilities  16,788 
Total liabilities  458,537 
Equity:    
Total members' equity  120,504 
Total liabilities and  members' equity $579,041 


(in thousands) 
Six Months
Ended
June 30, 2017
  Year Ended December 31 , 2016 
Rental income $0  $0 
Expenses  25   953 
Net income (loss) 
$
(25) $(953)

Note 54 - Savings Plans


The Company sponsors the AmBase 401(k) Savings Plan (the "Savings Plan"“Savings Plan”), which is a "Section“Section 401(k) Plan"Plan” within the meaning of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"“Code”). The Savings Plan permits eligible employees to make contributions of a percentage of their compensation, which are matched by the Company at a percentage of the employees'employees’ elected deferral.  Employee contributions to the Savings Plan are invested at the employee'semployee’s discretion in various investment funds. The Company'sCompany’s matching contributions are invested in the same manner as the compensation reduction contributions.  All contributions are subject to the maximum limitations contained in the Code.


The Company'sCompany’s matching contributions to the Savings Plan, charged to expense, were as follows:


($ in thousands) Year Ended December 31, 2017  Year Ended December 31, 2016  
Year Ended
December 31,
2023
  
Year Ended
December 31,
2022
 
Company matching contributions $25  $25  $92  $83 
Employer match %  33%  33%  100%  100%


24

AMBASE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 65 - Stockholders'Stockholders’ Equity


Authorized common stock consists of the following:


(shares in thousands) December 31, 2017  December 31, 2016  
December 31,
2023
  
December 31,
2022
 
Par value $0.01  $0.01  $0.01  $0.01 
Authorized shares  85,000   85,000   85,000   85,000 
Issued shares  46,410   46,410   46,410   46,410 
Outstanding shares  40,738   40,738   40,738   40,738 


Authorized cumulative preferred stock consists of the following:


(shares in thousands) December 31, 2017  December 31, 2016  
December 31,
2023
  
December 31,
2022
 
Par value $0.01  $0.01  $0.01  $0.01 
Authorized shares  20,000   20,000   20,000   20,000 
Issued shares  -   -   -   - 
Outstanding shares  -   -   -   - 


Changes in the outstanding shares of Common Stock of the Company are as follows:


(in thousands) Year Ended December 31, 2017  Year Ended December 31, 2016  
Year Ended
December 31,
2023
  
Year Ended
December 31,
2022
 
Common stock outstanding at beginning of period  40,738   40,738   40,738   40,738 
Common stock repurchased for treasury  -   -   -   - 
Issuance of treasury stock  -   -   -   - 
Common stock outstanding at end of period  40,738   40,738   40,738   40,738 


Changes in the treasury shares of Common Stock of the Company are as follows:


(in thousands) Year Ended December 31, 2017  Year Ended December 31, 2016  
Year Ended
December 31,
2023
  
Year Ended
December 31,
2022
 
Treasury stock held at beginning of period  5,672   5,672   5,672   5,672 
Common stock repurchased for treasury  -   -   -   - 
Issuance of treasury stock  -   -   -   - 
Treasury stock held at end of period  5,672   5,672   5,672   5,672 


Common Stock Repurchase Plan


The Company'sCompany’s common stock repurchase plan (the "Repurchase Plan"“Repurchase Plan”) allows for the repurchase by the Company of its common stock in the open market.  The Repurchase Plan is conditioned upon favorable business conditions and acceptable prices for the common stock.  Purchases under the Repurchase Plan may be made, from time to time, in the open market, through block trades or otherwise.  Depending on market conditions and other factors, purchases may be commenced or suspended at any time or from time to time without prior notice.  Pursuant to the Repurchase Plan, the Company has repurchased shares of common stock from unaffiliated parties at various dates at market prices at their time of purchase, including broker commissions.  Due to the Company’s current financial condition and ongoing litigation proceedings, the Company does not anticipate that it will make any stock purchases pursuant to the Repurchase Plan in the next twelve months.


25

AMBASE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Information relating to the Repurchase Plan is as follows:


(in thousands)
 
Year Ended
December 31, 2017
2023
 
Common shares repurchased to treasury during the period  - 
Aggregate cost of shares repurchased during the period $- 


(in thousands) 
December 31, 2017
2023
 
Total number of common shares authorized for repurchase  10,000 
Total number of common shares repurchased to date  6,226 
Total number of shares that may yet be repurchased  3,774 

Common stock reserved for issuance under the Company's 1993 Stock Incentive Plan as further described in Note 8 herein is as follows:

(in thousands)December 31, 2017
1993 Stock Incentive Plan4,320
Total common shares reserved for issuance4,320


Stockholder Rights Plan


On January 29, 1986,March 27, 2019, the Company'sCompany’s Board of Directors adopted an amended and restated shareholder rights plan (the “New Rights Plan”) pursuant to which the Board of Directors declared a dividend distribution of one right (a “Right”) for each outstanding share of Common Stock of the Company. TheCompany on April 17, 2019. In connection with the New Rights Plan, the Company entered into an amended and restated rights agreement with American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC, as amended, which entitlerights agent (the “New Rights Agreement”).

Under the New Rights Plan, each Right entitles the holder to purchase from the Company aone share of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “Common Stock”), at a price equal to 50% of $75.00,the then current market value of the Common Stock.  The Rights are not exercisable until either a person or group of affiliated persons acquires 25% or more of the Company'sCompany’s outstanding common sharesCommon Stock or upon the commencement or disclosure of an intention to commence a tender offer or exchange offer for 20% or more of the common shares.Common Stock. The rightsRights are redeemable by the Company at $0.05$0.01 per rightRight at any time until the earlier of the tenth day10 days following an accumulation of 20% or more of the Company'sCompany’s shares by a single acquirer or group, or the occurrence of certain Triggering Events (as defined in the StockholderNew Rights Plan)Agreement).  In addition, the eventBoard of Directors may, at its option and in its sole and absolute discretion, at any time after a Triggering Event, mandatorily exchange all or part of the rights becomethen outstanding and exercisable and thereafter,Rights for consideration per Right consisting of 50% of the Company is acquired in a merger or other business combination, or in certain other circumstances, each right will entitle the holder to purchase from the surviving corporation, forsecurities that would be issuable at such time upon the exercise price, Common Stock havingof one Right. The Rights Plan also provides certain administrative provisions that require a market valuestockholder to make certain representations regarding its beneficial ownership of twice theCompany securities upon exercise priceor exchange of the right.Rights. The rightsRights are subject to adjustment to prevent dilution and expire on February 10, 2021.March 27, 2029.


Note 6 – Commitments and Contingencies

Rent expense was as follows:

($ in thousands) 
Year Ended
December 31,
2023
  
Year Ended
December 31,
2022
 
Rent expense $12  $12 
Approximate square feet of leased office space  350   350 

The Company rents on a short-term basis approximately 150 square feet of office space in Coral Springs, Florida, and approximately 200 square feet of office space in Emerson, NJ.

The Company follows the practical expedient method for the accounting of leases and has elected to follow the short-term lease accounting policy election which allows lessees not to recognize right-of-use assets and liabilities for leases with a term of 12 months or less.

26

AMBASE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 7 - Incentive Plans

Under the Company's 1994 Senior Management Incentive Compensation Plan (the "1994 Plan"), any executive officer of the Company whose compensation is required to be reported to stockholders under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Participants") and who is serving as such at any time during the fiscal year as to which an award is granted, may receive an award of a cash bonus ("Bonus"), in an amount determined by the Personnel Committee of the Company's Board of Directors (the "Committee") and payable from an annual bonus fund (the "Annual Bonus Pool"). The Committee may award Bonuses under the 1994 Plan to Participants not later than 120 days after the end of each fiscal year (the "Reference Year").

If the Committee grants a Bonus under the 1994 Plan, the amount of the Annual Bonus Pool will be an amount equal to the sum of (i) plus (ii), where:

(i) a percentage of the amount by which the Company's Total Stockholders' Equity, as defined, on the last day of a Reference Year increased over the Company's Total Stockholders' Equity, as defined, on the last day of the immediately preceding Reference Year; and

(ii) a percentage of the amount by which the Company's market value, as defined, on the last day of the Reference Year increased over the Company's market value on the last day of the immediately preceding Reference Year.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the 1994 Plan provides that in the event of a decrease in either or both of items (i) and/or (ii) above, the Annual Bonus Pool is determined by reference to the last Reference Year in which there was an increase in such item.  If the Committee determines within the time period to award a Bonus, the share of the Annual Bonus Pool to be allocated to Participants shall be pursuant to percentages of the Annual Bonus Pool as set forth in the 1994 Plan to the Company's Chief Executive Officer, and a percentage of the Annual Bonus Pool shall be allocated pro rata to each of the Company's Participants as determined by the Committee.  The Committee in its discretion may reduce the percentage of the Annual Bonus Pool to any Participant for any Reference Year, and such reduction shall not increase the share of any other Participant. The 1994 Plan is not the exclusive plan under which the Executive Officers may receive cash or other incentive compensation or bonuses. No bonuses were paid attributable to the 1994 Plan for 2017 and 2016.

The Company's 1993 Stock Incentive Plan (the "1993 Plan"), expires in May 2018.  At the current time the Company has decided not to extend the expiration date of the 1993 Plan. Under the 1993 Plan the Company may grant to officers and employees of the Company and its subsidiaries, stock options ("Options"), stock appreciation rights ("SARs"), restricted stock awards ("Restricted Stock"), merit awards ("Merit Awards") and performance share awards ("Performance Shares") through May 28, 2018.  There are no options exercised.  A pre-determined number of shares of the Company's Common Stock are reserved for issuance under the 1993 Plan (upon the exercise of Options and Stock Appreciation Rights, and awards of Restricted Stock and Performance Shares); however, only a portion of such shares are available for the issuance of Restricted Stock Awards and Merit Awards. Such shares shall be authorized but unissued shares of Common Stock. Options may be granted as incentive stock options ("ISOs") intended to qualify for favorable tax treatment under Federal tax law or as nonqualified stock options ("NQSOs"). SARs may be granted with respect to any Options granted under the 1993 Plan and may be exercised only when the underlying Option is exercisable. The 1993 Plan requires that the exercise price of all Options and SARs be equal to or greater than the fair value of the Company's Common Stock on the date of grant of that Option. The term of any NQSO, ISO or related SAR cannot exceed terms under federal tax law and/or as prescribed in the 1993 Plan. Subject to the terms of the 1993 Plan and any additional restrictions imposed at the time of grant, Options and any related SARs ordinarily will become exercisable pursuant to a vesting period prescribed at the time of grant.  In the case of a "Change of Control" of the Company (as defined in the 1993 Plan), Options granted pursuant to the 1993 Plan may become fully exercisable as to all optioned shares from and after the date of such Change in Control in the discretion of the Committee or as may otherwise be provided in the grantee's Option agreement. Death, retirement, or absence for disability will not result in the cancellation of any Options.

As a condition to any award of Restricted Stock or Merit Award under the 1993 Plan, the Committee may require a participant to pay an amount equal to, or in excess of, the par value of the shares of Restricted Stock or Common Stock awarded to him or her. Restricted Stock may not be sold, assigned, transferred, pledged or otherwise encumbered during a "Restricted Period", which in the case of grants to employees shall not be less than one year from the date of grant. The Restricted Period with respect to any outstanding shares of Restricted Stock awarded to employees may be reduced by the Committee at any time, but in no event shall the Restricted Period be less than one year. Except for such restrictions, the employee as the owner of such stock shall have all of the rights of a stockholder including, but not limited to, the right to vote such stock and to receive dividends thereon as and when paid. In the event that an employee's employment is terminated for any reason, an employee's Restricted Stock will be forfeited; provided, however, that the Committee may limit such forfeiture in its sole discretion. At the end of the Restricted Period, all shares of Restricted Stock shall be transferred free and clear of all restrictions to the employee. In the case of a Change in Control of the Company (as defined in the 1993 Plan), an employee may receive his or her Restricted Stock free and clear of all restrictions in the discretion of the Committee, or as may otherwise be provided pursuant to the employee's Restricted Stock award.

Performance Share awards of Common Stock under the 1993 Plan shall be earned on the basis of the Company's performance in relation to established performance measures for a specific performance period. Such measures may include, but shall not be limited to, return on investment, earnings per share, return on stockholder's equity, or return to stockholders. Performance Shares may not be sold, assigned, transferred, pledged or otherwise encumbered during the relevant performance period. Performance Shares may be paid in cash, shares of Common Stock or shares of Restricted Stock in such portions as the Committee may determine. An employee must be employed at the end of the performance period to receive payments of Performance Shares; provided, however, in the event that an employee's employment is terminated by reason of death, disability, retirement or other reason approved by the Committee, the Committee may limit such forfeiture in its sole discretion. In the case of a Change in Control of the Company (as defined in the 1993 Plan), an employee may receive his or her Performance Shares in the discretion of the Committee, or as may otherwise be provided in the employee's Performance Share award.

Information relating to the Company's 1993 Plan is as follows:

  Year Ended 
(shares in thousands) December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016 
      
Stock option grants      
Stock options exercisable      
Stock options outstanding      

The fair value of option awards are estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes-Merton option valuation model ("Black-Scholes") utilizing certain assumptions at the time of valuation. Expected volatilities are based on historical volatility of the Company's stock.  The Company uses historical data to estimate option exercises and employee terminations within the valuation model.  The expected term of options granted is estimated based on the contractual lives of option grants, option vesting period and historical data and represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding.  The risk-free interest rate for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury bond yield in effect at the time of grant.

The Black-Scholes option valuation model requires the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected life of the stock-based award and stock price volatility.  The assumptions utilized represent management's best estimates, but these estimates involve inherent uncertainties and the application of management's judgment.  As a result, if other assumptions had been used, our recorded stock-based compensation expense could have been materially different from the amounts previously recorded.  In addition, the Company is required to estimate the expected forfeiture rate and only recognize expense for those shares expected to vest.  If the actual forfeiture rate is materially different from our estimate, the share-based compensation expense could be materially different.  The Company believes that the use of the Black-Scholes model meets the fair value measurement objectives of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and reflects all substantive characteristics of the instruments being valued.

The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options, which have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected stock price volatility. Because the Company's employee stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options, and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, and given the substantial changes in the price per share of the Company's Common Stock, in management's opinion, the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of its employee stock options.

Compensation expense relating to stock options would be recorded in the Consolidated Statement of Operations, with a corresponding increase to additional paid in capital in the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity.

Note 8 - Income Taxes


The components of income tax expense (benefit) are as follows:


(in thousands) 
Year Ended
December 31, 2017
  
Year Ended
December 31, 2016
  
Year Ended
December 31,
2023
  
Year Ended
December 31,
2022
 
Federal - current $-  $-  $
-  $-
State - current  6   (142)  1   1 
Total current $6   (142)  1   1
                
Federal - deferred  (6,037)  (1,752)  (1,105)  (729)
State - deferred  (5,402)  (105)  (158)  (111)
Change in valuation allowance  (8,653)  1,857   1,263   840 
Total deferred  (20,092)  -   -   - 
Income tax expense (benefit) $(20,086) $(142) $1  $1


The components of pretax income (loss) and the difference between income taxes computed at the statutory federal rate and the provision for income taxes are as follows:


(in thousands) 
Year Ended
December 31, 2017
  
Year Ended
December 31, 2016
  
Year Ended
December 31,
2023
  
Year Ended
December 31,
2022
 
            
Income (loss) before income taxes $(68,143) $(3,361) $(5,270) $(3,472)
Tax expense (benefit) :        
Tax expense (benefit):        
Tax at statutory federal rate $(23,851) $(1,176) $(1,107) $(729)
State income taxes  (5,019)  (142)  (157)  (110)
Rate change  16,047   - 
Permanent items  -   - 
Other  1,390   (681)
Permanent items, tax credits and other adjustments
  2   - 
Change in valuation allowance  (8,653)  1,857   1,263   840 
Income tax expense (benefit) $(20,086) $(142) $1  $1


A reconciliation of the United States federal statutory rate to the Company'sCompany’s effective income tax rate is as follows:


 
Year Ended
December 31, 2017
  
Year Ended
December 31, 2016
  
Year Ended
December 31,
2023


Year Ended
December 31,
2022
 
Tax at statutory federal rate  35.0%  35.0%  21.0%  21.0%
State income taxes  7.0   4.2   3.0   3.2 
Rate change  (24.0)  - 
Permanent difference, tax credits and other adjustments  -   - 
Other  (2.0)  20.3 
Permanent items, tax credits and other adjustments
  -   - 
Change in valuation allowance  13.0   (55.3)  (24.0)  (24.2)
Effective income tax rate  29.0%  4.2%  0.0%  0.0%


27

AMBASE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
For the year ended December 31, 2017,2023, the Company recorded an income tax benefit partially offset by a state tax expense of $1,000 attributable to a provision for a tax on capital imposed by the state jurisdictions.  The income tax benefit for the year ended December 31, 2017, is attributable to a release of a valuation allowance in relation to the AMT Credit carryforwards and resulting deferred tax asset due to recognition of AMT Credit carryforwards projected to be refundable as provided for in the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the "2017 Tax Act") as further detailed herein.

For the year ended December 31, 2017, other includes amounts relating to deferred tax true-ups.

State2022, the Company recorded an income tax amounts for the year ended December 31, 2017, reflectexpense of $1,000, attributable to a provision for a tax on capital imposed by the state jurisdictions.  State

The utilization of net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards are subject to limitations under U.S. federal income tax amounts for the year ended December 31, 2016, reflect a net benefit related to current year and prior yearvarious state tax true-ups. Forlaws. Based on the year ended December 31, 2016, other includes amounts relatingCompany’s federal tax returns as filed, the Company estimates it has approximately $133 million of federal NOL carryforwards available to deferredreduce future federal taxable income which if not utilized will begin to expire in 2026 and continue to expire at various dates thereafter. Additionally, based on the Company’s state tax true-ups. returns as filed and to be filed, the Company estimates that it has approximately $238 million of state NOL carryforwards to reduce future state taxable income which if not utilized will begin to expire in 2030 and continue to expire at various dates thereafter.

The Company has not been notified of any potential tax audits by any federal, state, or local tax authorities.

The As such, the Company believes the statutes of limitations for the assessment of additional federal and state tax liabilities are generally closed for tax years prior to 2014.2020.  Interest and/or penalties related to uncertain tax positions, if applicable, would be included as a component of income tax expense (benefit).  The accompanying financial statements do not include any amounts for interest and/or penalties.


The utilization of certain carryforwards and carrybacks is subject to limitations under U.S. federal income tax laws. Based on the Company's federal tax returns as filed and to be filed, the Company estimates it has federal NOL carryforwards available to reduce future federal taxable income which would expire if unused, as indicated below.

The federal NOL carryforwards as of December 31, 2017 are as follows:

Tax Year
Originating
Tax Year
Expiring
 Amount 
     
20062026 $500,000 
20072027  12,700,000 
20082028  4,600,000 
20092029  2,400,000 
20102030  1,900,000 
20112031  1,900,000 
20132033  3,700,000 
20142034  4,900,000 
20152035  4,200,000 
20162036  3,400,000 
20172037  4,400,000 
    $44,600,000 

Alternative Minimum Tax ("AMT") Credit carryforwards available, which can be used to offset income generated in future years which are not subject to expiration, are as follows:

  Amount 
AMT Credits carryforwards
 $21,600,000 

As noted above the Company has AMT Credit carryforwards from prior tax years. In accordance with the 2017 Tax Act AMT Credit carryforwards, subject to certain estimated reduction adjustments to the amount indicated above, are expected to be claimed by the Company as refundable on tax returns to be filed in future tax years and at various percentages as noted below.

The Company's AMT Credit carryforward amount(s) projected to be claimed as refundable for each tax year are as follows:

Tax Year (a)
 
Declining balance of the AMT Credit carryforward amount(s) available for each tax year (a) (b)
  % of AMT Credit carryforward amount(s) available to be claimed as refundable for each tax year  
AMT Credit carryforward amount(s) projected to be claimed as refundable for each tax year (a) (b)
 
          
2018 $20,092,000   50% $10,046,000 
2019  10,046,000   50%  5,023,000 
2020  5,023,000   50%  2,511,500 
2021  2,511,500   
100
%  2,511,500 
          
$
20,092,000
 

(a) Assumes no regular federal income tax liability in tax years presented above which would reduce any AMT Credit carryforward amount(s) ultimately refunded.

(b) The declining balance of the AMT Credit carryforward amount(s) available for each tax year and the AMT Credit carryforward amount(s) projected to be claimed as refundable for each tax year are net of certain estimated adjustments from the previously disclosed AMT Credit carryforward amounts.

The 2017 Tax Act makes broad and complex changes to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), including, among other changes, significant changes to the U.S. corporate tax rate and certain other changes to the Code that impact the taxation of corporations. The U.S. Treasury Department, the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS"), and other standard-setting bodies could interpret or issue guidance on how provisions of the 2017 Tax Act will be applied or otherwise administered that differs from our interpretation. As we complete our analysis of the 2017 Tax Act, collect and prepare necessary data, and interpret any additional guidance, we may make adjustments to provisional amounts that we have recorded that may materially impact our provision for income taxes in the period in which the adjustments are made. Additionally, thereThere is risk relating to assumptions regarding the outcome of tax matters, based in whole or in part upon consultation with outside advisors; risk relating to potential unfavorable decisions in tax proceedings; and risks regarding changes in, and/or interpretations of federal and state income tax laws. Additionally,Moreover, applicable provisions of the Company's tax advisors indicate thatCode and IRS regulations permit the IRS typically has broad discretion to examine taxpayerchallenge Company tax positions and filed returns evenor additional taxes for an extended period of time after refunds have been paid to taxpayers, which could result in adjustments to AMT Credit carryforward amounts claimedsuch returns are filed. The Company can give no assurances as refundable and/or AMT Credit carryforward amounts ultimately received.

The Company's management is continuing to work closely with outside advisors on the Company's tax matters as they relate to the 2017 Tax Act and on the various federal tax return matters for the numerous interrelated tax years, including the provisions and application of the 2017 Tax Act along with the amounts and timingfinal outcome of any AMT Credit carryforward refunds. The AMT Credit carryforwards by the Company from prior tax years and related refund(s) could potentially be subject to IRS or other tax authority audits, including possible IRS Joint Committee review, and/or approval.  Neither the Company nor its outside advisors can predict whether or not the IRS and/or other tax authorities will review the Company's tax returns to be filed and/or as filed in prior years.if any.

Based on the Company's state tax returns as filed and to be filed, the Company estimates that it has state NOL carryforwards to reduce future state taxable income, which would expire if unused.

The state NOL carryforwards as of December 31, 2017 are as follows:

Tax Year
Originating
Tax Year
Expiring
 Amount 
     
20112031 $1,800,000 
20132033  2,700,000 
20142034  4,200,000 
20152035  4,100,000 
20162036  2,800,000 
20172037  1,200,000 
    $16,800,000 


The Company haswas a plaintiff in a legal proceeding seeking recovery of damages from the United States Government for the loss of the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Carteret Savings Bank, F.A. (the “SGW Legal Proceedings”).  A settlement agreement in the SGW Legal Proceedings between the Company, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation-Receiver (“FDIC-R”) and the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) on behalf of the United States of America (the “United States”), was executed (the “SGW 2012 Settlement Agreement”) which was approved by the United States Court of Federal Claims (the “Court of Federal Claims”) in October 2012.  On August 6, 2013, Senior Judge Smith issued an opinion which addressed the relief sought by AmBase. In summary, the court held that the Settlement Agreement is a contract and that it entitles the Company to receive both “(1) the amount of the tax consequences resulting from taxation of the damages award plus (2) the tax consequences of receiving the first component.”  But the Court of Federal Claims did not award an additional amount for the second component at that time given the remaining uncertainty surrounding the ultimate tax treatment of the settlement proceeds and the gross-up, as well as uncertainty relating to the Company’s future income.  The Court of Federal Claims indicated that either the Company or the government is entitled to seek further relief “if, and when, the facts justify it.”

The Company’s deferred tax asset, arising primarily from NOL carryforwards, and AMT creditsis as follows:

  December 31, 2017  December 31, 2016 
Deferred tax asset $47,800,000  $36,400,000 
Valuation allowance  (27,708,000)  (36,400,000)
Net deferred tax asset recognized $20,092,000  $- 


A valuation allowance was released in relation to the AMT Credit carryforwards which are projected to be refundable as part of the 2017 Tax Act enacted in December 2017. 
(in thousands)
 
December 31,
2023
  
December 31,
2022
 
Deferred tax asset $41,784  $40,520 
Valuation allowance  (41,784)  (40,520)
Net deferred tax asset recognized $-  $- 

A full valuation allowance remains on the remaining deferred tax asset amounts, as management has no basis to conclude that realization is more likely than not.  Management does not believe that any significant changes in unrecognized income tax benefits are expected to occur over the next year.


28

AMBASE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 98 - Legal Proceedings



From time to time, the Company and its subsidiaries may be named as a defendant in various lawsuits or proceedings. At the current time except as set forth below, the Company is unaware of any legal proceedings pending against the Company. The Company intends to aggressively contest all litigation and contingencies, as well as pursue all sources for contributions to settlements. However, there can be no assurance that the Company will prevail with respect to any of its claims.




The Company is a party to material legal proceedings as follows:




AmBase Corp., et al. v. 111 West 57th Sponsor LLC, et al.In April 2016, AmBase and certain of its subsidiaries and affiliates (collectively, the “Plaintiffs”) initiated a litigation in the New York State Supreme Court for New York County (the "NY Court"“NY Court”), Index No. 652301/2016, ("(“AmBase v. 111 West 57th57th Sponsor LLC, et al.") (the "111 West 57th Action"“Sponsor Action”).  The defendants in that litigation wereinclude 111 West 57th Sponsor LLC 111 West 57th JDS LLC, PMG West 57th Street LLC, 111 West 57th Control LLC, 111 West 57th Developer LLC, Elliot Joseph, 111 West 57th KM Equity LLC, 111 West 57th KM Group LLC,(the “Sponsor), Kevin Maloney, Matthew Phillips, Michael Stern, Ned White and Franklin R. Kaimanvarious members and affiliates, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, and Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company (collectively, "Defendants"“Defendants”) and nominal defendantdefendants 111 West 57th Partners LLC and 111 West 57th Mezz 1 LLC. In the current version of the complaint, AmBase alleges in that action, that Defendants violated multiple provisions in the JV Agreement, including by failing to honor the exercise of AmBase'sAmBase’s contractual "equity“equity put right"right” as set forth in the JV Agreement (the "Equity“Equity Put Right"Right”). and by not objecting to the 2017 foreclosure of the junior mezzanine loan on the project, as well as fraudulent misrepresentation or omission. AmBase is seeking compensatory damages, as well as punitive damages, indemnification and equitable relief, including a declaration of the parties'parties’ rights, and an accounting. The Company has also demanded from the Sponsor access to the books and records for the 111 West 57th57th Property which the Sponsor refused, claiming they have provided all books and records as required.



The Defendants filed motionsa motion to dismiss an earlier complaint, and on January 12, 2018, the NY Court issued an opinion allowing some of AmBase'sAmBase’s claims to go forward and dismissing others.others (“2018 Order”). Among other claims that the NY Court declined to dismiss was AmBase'sAmBase’s claim that the Defendants violated the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing by frustrating AmBase'sAmBase’s Equity Put Right by declining to produce a timely budget.Right. Claims that the NY Court dismissed included AmBase'sAmBase’s claim that the Defendants breached their contract with AmBase by financing capital contributions for the project through funds obtained from third parties. On January 16, 2018, some of the Defendants wrote to the NY Court suggesting that the opinion contained certain clerical errors and was missing a page. On January 18, 2018, the NY Court removed its previous opinion from the docket and on January 29, 2018, posted a revised opinion. AOn April 13, 2018, AmBase filed a notice of appeal of the 2018 Order to the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division, First Judicial Department (the “Appellate Division”). On January 22, 2020, the Company filed a motion with the Appellate Division seeking to enlarge the time to perfect the Company’s appeal of the 2018 Order, in light of an intervening removal to and remand from federal court. On July 2, 2020, the Appellate Division granted AmBase’s motion and enlarged the time to perfect the Company’s appeal to the October 2020 Term of the Appellate Division. On April 29, 2021, the Appellate Division affirmed Justice Bransten’s dismissal of the claims on appeal, while the claims that were not previously dismissed remain pending in the trial court.



On April 27, 2018, the Company filed a third amended complaint adding federal RICO claims, and new claims for declaratory judgment, breach of contract, fraud, and breach of fiduciary duty, based on information discovered during the course of discovery conferenceand events that have transpired since the Company filed its previous complaint in thisthe Sponsor Action. On June 18, 2018, Defendants removed the complaint to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (the “Federal Court”), where it was docketed as case number 18-cv-5482-AT.



On October 25, 2018, the Federal Court issued an order granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss the Company’s RICO claims and declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Company’s state-law claims, dismissing the latter claims without prejudice. On August 30, 2019, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the Federal Court’s dismissal of the federal RICO claims, vacated the Federal Court’s dismissal of the state-law claims, and remanded with instructions for the Federal Court to remand those claims to the NY Court. On September 25, 2019, the Federal Court remanded the case to the NY Court, where it was assigned to the Honorable O. Peter Sherwood.



On June 11, 2020, Defendants filed a motion with the NY Court to dismiss some of the state law claims asserted by the Company in the third amended complaint.  On July 28, 2020, Plaintiffs filed a motion for leave to amend the third amended complaint, which Defendants opposed.  The proposed complaint added, among other things, claims arising from certain defendants’ role in the 2017 foreclosure of the junior mezzanine loan on the project. On July 22, 2021, the NY Court granted Plaintiffs leave to amend and denied the motion to dismiss without prejudice as moot in light of the Court’s decision granting Plaintiffs leave to amend.

29

Table of Contents
AMBASE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

On July 29, 2021, Plaintiffs filed their fourth amended complaint. On September 3, 2021, Defendants submitted a motion to dismiss the fourth amended complaint in part, which Plaintiffs opposed. On May 9, 2022, the NY Court issued a Decision and Order on Defendants’ motion to dismiss, allowing some of AmBase’s claims to go forward and dismissing others (“May 9, 2022 Order”). The NY Court declined to dismiss AmBase’s claims that the Defendants breached their contracts with AmBase by permitting transfers or encumbrances upon 111 West 57th Control LLC’s membership interests in connection with third-party financing without seeking or obtaining prior written approval.  The Court also declined to dismiss AmBase’s claim that Defendants breached their obligations under the Development Agreement by, among other things, failing to use “commercially reasonable efforts” to plan, design, develop, construct, and obtain permits for the Property in a timely manner and failing to devote sufficient time and attention to its obligations under the Development Agreement.



Claims that the NY Court dismissed included AmBase’s claims that Defendants breached their contract with AmBase by making capital contributions to Sponsor from third parties; consenting to the strict foreclosure without obtaining AmBase’s prior written approval in violation of the “Major Decisions” provision; refusing to cooperate and share information with AmBase’s construction consultant; and engaging in fraud and intentional misconduct in violation of Joint Venture Agreement section 8.5. The NY Court also dismissed AmBase’s claim that Defendants made fraudulent misrepresentations or omissions (as duplicative of the breach of contract claims) and other claims whose dismissal was compelled by a prior decision of the First Department, namely, AmBase’s claims that Sponsor, Stern, and Maloney breached their fiduciary duties of loyalty; to impose a constructive trust on the insurance loss fund; and to impose a constructive trust on Stern’s, Maloney’s, JDS’s, PMG’s, and the construction manager’s construction management fees and Stern’s and Maloney’s equity interest in the Project.  Finally, the Court dismissed AmBase’s current allegations that piercing certain of Defendants’ corporate veils is warranted. On January 18, 2023, the Company filed a notice of appeal appealing the May 9, 2022 Order with regard to all defendants in the Sponsor Action and perfected the appeal on July 10, 2023.



On November 28, 2023, the Appellate Division First Department issued its decision modifying the NY Court’s decision in part and affirming the NY Court’s decision in part. The First Department modified the NY Court’s decision by reinstating Plaintiffs’ breach of contract claim based on Defendants’ refusing to cooperate and share information with AmBase’s construction consultant and one part of Plaintiffs’ fraudulent misrepresentation or omission claim asserted against one of the individual defendants. The First Department otherwise affirmed the NY Court’s decision.


Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company (“Liberty Mutual Defendants”) were named as defendants in the fourth amended complaint. On September 30, 2021, the Liberty Mutual Defendants answered the fourth amended complaint and filed a counterclaim against the Company’s subsidiaries for specific performance of a pledge agreement securing certain insurance policies issued for the Project. Plaintiffs replied to those counterclaims on October 20, 2021. On March 14, 2024, the parties filed a Stipulation of Discontinuance Against Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company whereby all causes of action, counterclaims, and cross-claims by and against the Liberty Mutual Defendants were discontinued without prejudice.  The Court entered the Stipulation on March 15, 2024.



On January 30, 2023, Sponsor, Stern, Maloney, and various defendant members and affiliates filed their answer and asserted counterclaims against the Company’s subsidiaries for breach of the Joint Venture Agreement in connection with a proposed refinancing of the Project in 2016. Plaintiffs replied to those counterclaims on February 21, 2023. Discovery in the case is currently scheduled for February 27, 2018.ongoing. For additional information with regard to the Company'sCompany’s investment in the 111 West 57th Property, including the foreclosure, see Note 43.




AmBase Corp., et al. v. Spruce Capital Partners, et al.In July 2017, the Company initiated a second litigation in the NY Court, Index No. 655031/2017,, (the "111 West 57th Spruce Action" (the “Lender Action”). The defendants in the 111 West 57th Spruce action arewere 111 W57 Mezz Investor, LLC (“Spruce”), Spruce Capital Partners LLC, 111 West 57th Sponsor LLC, Michael Z. Stern, and Kevin P. Maloney (collectively, "Defendants") and nominal defendants 111 West 57th Partners LLC and 111 West 57th Mezz 1 LLC. The Company has since voluntarily discontinued its claims against Sponsor, Stern, and Maloney, without prejudice to reinstating them in the 111 West 57th Spruce Action or any other action.




Spruce had given notice to the junior mezzanine borrower that it proposed to accept the pledged collateral (including the joint venture members'members’ collective interest in the property) in full satisfaction of the joint venture'sventure’s indebtedness under the Junior Mezzanine Loan (i.e., a "Strict Foreclosure"“Strict Foreclosure”). After the SponsorsSponsor refused to object to Spruce'sSpruce’s proposal on behalf of the junior mezzanine borrower, and Spruce refused to commit to honor Investment LLC'sLLC’s objection on its own behalf, the Company initiated this litigationthe 111 West 57th Spruce Action to obtain injunctive relief halting the Strict Foreclosure.  For additional information on the events leading to this litigation seeNote 43.



30

AMBASE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

On July 26, 2017, the NY Court issued a temporary restraining order barring Spruce from accepting the collateral, pending a preliminary injunction hearing scheduled for August 14, 2017. Spruce and the SponsorsSponsor subsequently filed papers in opposition to the request for a preliminary injunction and cross-motions to dismiss and quash subpoenas. On August 14, 2017, the NY Court postponed the hearing until August 28, 2017, keeping the temporary restraining order preventing a Strict Foreclosure in effect until the August 28, 2017 hearing. Subsequently, the Company filed a response briefsbrief in support of their request for injunctive relief halting the Strict Foreclosure process and briefs in opposition to the motions to quash the subpoenas.




On August 28, 2017, the NY Court held a preliminary injunction hearing, lifted the temporary restraining order, denied Plaintiffs'Plaintiffs’ request for a preliminary injunction, and granted Defendants'Defendants’ cross-motions. In order to prevent the Strict Foreclosure process from going forward, the Company immediately obtained an interim stay from the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division, First Judicial Department ("(“Appellate Division"Division”). That stay remained in place until four (4) P.M. August 29, 2017, permitting the Company to obtain an appealable order, notice an appeal, and move for a longer-term stay or injunctive relief pending appeal. The Appellate Division held a hearing on August 29, 2017, to consider the Company'sCompany’s motion for an interim stay or injunctive relief pending appeal, both of which it denied, thus allowing the purported Strict Foreclosure to move forward.



In January 2019, the Appellate Division issued a decision that resolves the Company’s appeal from the order denying a preliminary injunction and dismissing its claims. The Appellate Division affirmed the decision below in part and otherwise dismissed the appeal. It noted that the Company will continueshould be allowed to challengemove for leave to amend to state claims for damages and/or the validityimposition of a constructive trust, as the dismissal of the actions that led to this purported transfer of title, including appeal.Company’s claims was without prejudice.




On August 30, 2017,May 3, 2019, the Company’s subsidiary, Investment LLC, entered into a stipulation with Spruce issued a Notice of Retention of Pledged Collateralto amend the complaint in Full Satisfaction of Indebtedness. By purportingthe Lender Action to accept the pledged collateral, pursuant to a Strict Foreclosure process,state claims against Spruce claims to have completed the retentionfor breaches of the collateral pledged byUniform Commercial Code and Pledge Agreement and various torts. The amended complaint seeks the junior mezzanine borrower, and therefore,entry of a declaratory judgment, the Company's interest inimpression of a constructive trust, permanent injunctive relief restraining Spruce from disposing of or encumbering the 111 West 57th Street Property.57th Property, and damages, including punitive damages. The carrying valueamended complaint did not name the Company as a plaintiff or Spruce Capital Partners as a defendant. On May 31, 2019, Spruce filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint. On January 29, 2020, the Court entered a decision and order granting in part and denying in part Spruce’s motion to dismiss the amended complaint. On February 26, 2020, Spruce filed a notice of the Company's equity investment in the 111 West 57th Property represented a substantial portion of the Company's assets and net equity value.

The Company has an appeal pending on its challenge to the Strict Foreclosure, which has not yet been resolved. The Company is currently attempting to have the Appellate Division declareseeking the Strict Foreclosure invalidappeal of the January 29, 2020 order. On March 4, 2020, Investment LLC filed a notice of cross-appeal to the Appellate Division, seeking to appeal the January 29, 2020 order to the extent the NY Court dismissed some of Investment LLC’s claims. On March 30, 2021, the Appellate Division issued a decision and order revising the January 29, 2020, order by reinstating Investment LLC’s derivative claim for breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing and dismissing the remaining claims.


While the appeal was pending, the parties to enjoin the Strict Foreclosure. The CompanyLender Action conducted discovery. On April 13, 2021, Investment LLC moved for leave to file a stay or injunctive reliefSecond Amended Complaint to (1) bolster its factual allegations against the existing Defendant, (2) add claims against Spruce Capital Partners, Joshua Crane, and Robert Schwartz (“Spruce Defendants”), Arthur Becker and his affiliates (“Atlantic Defendants”), Apollo and its affiliates (“Apollo Defendants”), and AIG and its affiliates (“AIG Defendants”). On September 30, 2021, the Court granted the motion, and Investment LLC filed its Second Amended Complaint on the same day. On November 22, 2021, the various defendants filed separate motions to dismiss the claims against them. On December 13, 2021, Investment LLC filed a combined opposition to the motions. The defendants filed their replies on January 7, 2022.



On May 17, 2022, Plaintiff in the Lender Action filed a motion requesting that the court hold oral argument on the pending motions to dismiss. The court granted the motion and heard argument on July 22, 2022. During argument, counsel for Plaintiff made an oral motion to amend the complaint to add an express allegation that Defendants committed the tort of interference with contractual relations by procuring Sponsor’s breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing in the JV Agreement. The court called for supplemental briefs on the issue, which were filed on August 5, 2022.



On December 15, 2022, the NY Court issued a decision and order granting in part and denying in part the motions to dismiss (“December 15, 2022 Order”). Specifically, the NY Court declined to dismiss Plaintiff’s claims against Spruce and ACREFI Mortgage Lending, LLC, Apollo Credit Opportunity Fund III AIV I LP, and AGRE Debt 1 – 111 W 57, LLC (“Apollo Lenders”) for breach of the Pledge Agreement in connection with the strict foreclosure. The NY Court dismissed Plaintiff’s claims for tortious interference with contract against the Spruce Defendants, AIG Defendants, and Apollo Defendants, and Plaintiff’s claim for unjust enrichment against the Atlantic Defendants.


31

AMBASE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

On January 3, 2023, the Apollo Lenders filed a notice of appeal to the Appellate Division seeking review of the December 15, 2022 Order. On January 18, 2023, the Company filed notices of appeal and cross-appeal appealing the December 15, 2022, Order with regard to all Defendants. On August 9, 2023, pursuant to mutual agreement with the Company and the AIG Defendants, the Company filed a stipulation to withdraw its appeal against the AIG Defendants.  Following briefing and oral argument, the Appellate Division First Department issued its decision on October 5, 2023.  The First Department modified the NY Court’s decision to dismiss Plaintiff’s claim against the Apollo Lenders for breach of the Pledge Agreement in connection with the strict foreclosure, and otherwise affirmed the NY Court’s decision.  On November 3, 2023, Plaintiff filed motions for leave to appeal the First Department’s decision to the Court of Appeals in both the First Department and the Court of Appeals. On December 19, 2023, the First Department denied Plaintiff’s motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, which concerned Plaintiff’s claim against the Apollo Lenders for breach of the Pledge Agreement in connection with the strict foreclosure and Plaintiff’s claims against the Spruce Defendants and Apollo Lenders for tortious interference with contract.



On January 13, 2023, the Apollo Lenders filed their answer and affirmative defenses to the Company’s Second Amended Complaint together with crossclaims against 111 W57th Mezz Investor LLC, Spruce Capital Partners LLC, Joshua Crane, Robert Schwartz, Michael Stern, Kevin Maloney, 111 West 57th Sponsor LLC, 111 West 57th Control LLC, and 111 West 57th Manager LLC (the “Crossclaim Defendants”). The crossclaims are for (1) contribution against all Crossclaim Defendants; (2) indemnification against 111 W57th Mezz Investor LLC, Spruce Capital, Crane, and Schwartz; and (3) a declaratory judgment that motion was denied by111 W57th Mezz Investor LLC, through Spruce Capital, Crane, and Schwartz, has indemnified the appellate court onApollo Lenders against any and all loss that the Apollo Lenders have incurred or may incur in defending against this case. On January 18, 2018. 23, 2023, the Apollo Lenders filed a notice of voluntary discontinuance without prejudice, voluntarily discontinuing their first crossclaim for contribution only as it is brought against Stern, Maloney, Sponsor, 111 West 57th Control LLC, and 111 West 57th Manager LLC.




On January 30, 2023, Defendant 111 W57 Mezz Investor LLC filed its answer to Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint. Because the Court has resolved the motions to dismiss, discovery has recommenced, and Plaintiffs are actively seeking the production of documents.



Since the Company is not a party to the Loan Agreements, it does not have access to communications with the lenders, except for those individual communications that the Sponsors haveSponsor has elected to share.share or that have been produced in the ongoing litigation.  The Company has continued to demand access to such information, including access to the books and records for the 111 West 57th Property both under the JV Agreement and as part of the 111 West 57thSponsor Action and the 111 West 57th SpruceLender Action.

For additional information with regard to the Company'sCompany’s investment in the 111 West 57th Property and the Company’s recording of an impairment of its equity investment in the 111 West 57th Property; Property in 2017, see Note 4.  The carrying value3.



111 West 57th Investment LLC, et al. v. Kasowitz Benson Torres LLP, et al., No. 151139/2024 (N.Y. Sup. Ct.). On February 6, 2024, 111 West 57th Investment LLC, derivatively on behalf of 111 West 57th Partners LLC and 111 West 57th Mezz 1 LLC, and 111 West 57th Manager Funding LLC, derivatively on behalf of 111 West 57th Manager LLC (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), filed a Summons with Notice against Kasowitz Benson Torres LLP and Douglas B. Heitner (collectively, “Defendants”) in the Supreme Court of the Company's equityState of New York, County of New York. Plaintiffs’ claims arise out of Defendants’ representation of 111 West 57th Partners LLC, 111 West 57th Mezz 1 LLC, and 111 West 57th Manager LLC in connection with the real estate development project of 111 West 57th Street (the “Project”) and related financing and other transactions, while simultaneously representing persons and entities with interests adverse to and in conflict with 111 West 57th Partners LLC’s, 111 West 57th Mezz 1 LLC’s, and 111 West 57th Manager LLC’s interests (and the interests of other members of these represented entities), including but not limited to: 111 West 57th Sponsor LLC, 111 West 57th Control LLC, 111 West 57th Developer LLC, 111 Construction Manager LLC, Michael Stern, JDS Construction Group LLC, and JDS Development LLC.  Specifically, in representing 111 West 57th Partners LLC, 111 West 57th Mezz 1 LLC, and 111 West 57th Manager LLC throughout the restructuring of the financing and the raising of capital for the Project, including, without limitation, the New York Uniform Commercial Code “strict foreclosure” in 2017 on the Project, Defendants acted to the detriment of these clients to benefit their other, longtime clients, resulting in 111 West 57th Partners LLC losing an extremely valuable asset in the strict foreclosure.  Plaintiffs seek to recover money damages, improperly paid legal fees, costs, attorneys’ fees, and such other relief as is just and proper (together with interest thereon).  Plaintiffs allege that they have suffered damages and demand relief of no less than $100 million, improperly paid legal fees, and Plaintiffs’ own attorneys’ fees and costs.  For additional information with regard to the Company’s investment in the 111 West 57th Property, see Note 3.


32

AMBASE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

AmBase Corp., et al. v. ACREFI Mortgage Lending LLC, et al.In June 2018, the Company initiated another litigation in the NY Court, Index No. 655031/2017, (the “Apollo Action”). The defendants in the Apollo Action were ACREFI Mortgage Lending, LLC, Apollo Credit Opportunity Fund III AIV I LP, AGRE Debt 1 – 111 W 57, LLC, and Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance, Inc. (collectively, the “Apollo Defendants”). In the Apollo Action, the Company alleged that the Apollo Defendants aided and abetted the Sponsor, Stern, and Maloney in breaching their fiduciary duties to the Company in connection with the 111 West 57th Property and tortiously interfered with the JV Agreement. The Company was seeking damages as well as punitive damages for tortious interference with the JV Agreement and aiding and abetting the Sponsor’s breaches of their fiduciary duties to the joint venture. The Apollo Defendants filed a motion to dismiss on August 17, 2018. On October 22, 2019, the NY Court entered an order dismissing the Company’s complaint in the Apollo Action in its entirety. On November 8, 2019, the NY Court entered judgment (the “Apollo Dismissal”) dismissing the Apollo Action in favor of the Apollo Defendants. On December 10, 2019, the Company filed a notice of appeal seeking the appeal of the Apollo Dismissal. On August 7, 2020, the Company perfected its appeal of the Apollo Dismissal. After Investment LLC filed its motion to amend the complaint in the Lender Action to add claims against Apollo, the parties to the Apollo Action filed a stipulation to withdraw the appeal in the Apollo Action. For additional information with regard to the Company’s investment in the 111 West 57th Property, see Note 3.



AmBase Corp., et al. v. Custom House Risk Advisors, Inc., et al. On April 2, 2020, the Company initiated litigation in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Case No. 1:20-cv-02763-VSB (the “Custom House Action”). The defendants in the Custom House Action are Custom House Risk Advisors, Inc. and Elizabeth Lowe (collectively, the “Custom House Defendants”). In the Custom House Action, the Company alleges that the Custom House Defendants (a) aided and abetted Sponsor, Stern, and Maloney in breaching their fiduciary duties to the Company by structuring an insurance policy to the personal benefit of Sponsor, Stern and Maloney and the detriment of the 111 West 57th Project and concealing the structure and ownership of the insurance policy from the Company and (b) committed fraud by making material misrepresentations about the terms of the policy to the Company, inducing the Company to contribute additional capital to the 111 West 57th Project to cover the costs of the insurance policy. The Company is seeking damages as well as disgorgement of profits the Custom House Defendants earned from their wrongful conduct. On April 10, 2020, the Custom House Defendants waived service of process. The Custom House Defendants were required to respond to the complaint by June 8, 2020. The Custom House Defendants have not responded to the Company’s complaint. In an agreement dated July 31, 2020, the Company and the Custom House Defendants agreed to certain terms for a settlement and entered into a settlement agreement which requires that the Custom House Defendants satisfy certain conditions prior to any dismissal of the Custom House Action. On December 6, 2021, the Court approved a stipulation dismissing the Company’s claims and agreed to retain jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement.   For additional information with regard to the Company’s investment in the 111 West 57th Property, represented substantially all of the Company's assets and net equity value.see Note 3.


For information relating to the Litigation Funding Agreement entered into between the Company and Mr. Richard A. Bianco, the Company's President and Chief Executive Officer, see Note 10.


With respect to its disputes and litigation relating to its interest in the 111 West 57th Property, the Company is continuingpursuing, and will continue to pursue, other options to realize the Company’s investment value, various legal courses of action to protect its legal rights, recovery of its asset value from various sources of recovery, as well as considering other possible economic strategies, including the possible sale of the Company'sCompany’s interest in and/or rights with respect to the 111 West 57th Property. The57th Property; however, there can be no assurance that the Company is continuingwill prevail with respect to pursue other options to realize the Company's investment value and/or protectany of its legal rights.claims.



The Company can give no assurances regarding the outcome of the matters described herein, including as to the effect of Spruce'sSpruce’s actions described herein, whether the SponsorsSponsor will perform their contractual commitments to the Company under the JV Agreement, as to what further action, if any, the lenders may take with respect to the project, as to the ultimate resolution of the ongoing litigation proceedings relating to the Company'sCompany’s investment interest in the 111 West 57th Property, as to the ultimate effect of the Sponsors',Sponsor’s, the Company'sCompany’s or the lenders'lenders’ actions on the project, as to the completion or ultimate success of the project, or as to the value or ultimate realization of any portion of the Company'sCompany’s equity investment in the 111 West 57th Street Property. For additional information onwith regard to the Company'sCompany’s investment in the 111 West 57th Property, and the Company's legal actions related thereto, see Note 9.3.




While the Company'sCompany’s management is evaluating future courses of action to protect and/or recover the value of the Company'sCompany’s equity investment in the 111 West 57th Property, the adverse developments make it uncertain as to whether any such courses of action will be successful. Any such efforts are likely to require sustained effort over a period of time and require substantial additional financial resources. Inability to recover all or most of such value would, in all likelihood, have a material adverse effect on the Company'sCompany’s financial condition and future prospects.

IsZo Capital L.P. derivatively and on behalf of AmBase Corporation v. Richard A. Bianco, et al. In February 2018, IsZo Capital L.P. commenced an action, IsZo Capital L.P. derivatively and on behalf of AmBase Corporation v. Richard A. Bianco, et al., Index No. 650812/2018 in the New York State Supreme Court for New York County (the "IsZo Capital L.P. action"). The defendants in the action include all officers and directors of AmBase Corporation and AmBase Corporation as a nominal defendant.  The plaintiff alleges various breaches of fiduciary duty against all of the directors and officers concerning the decisions made in the 111 West 57th Street Property investment and a certain litigation funding agreement.  IsZo Capital L.P. also seeks declaratory judgment relief concerning a litigation funding agreement and the 111 West 57th Street Property.  AmBase and the officers and directors intend to vigorously defend themselves and will move to dismiss the Complaint when all of the officers and directors have been served with the Summons and Complaint. The Company can give no assurances regarding the outcomewith regard to if it will prevail with respect to any of the matters described herein.its claims.

33

AMBASE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 109 – Litigation Funding Agreement


In September 2017, the Company's executive officers and its Board of Directors concluded that it was in the Company's interestCompany entered into a Litigation Funding Agreement (the “2017 LFA”) with Mr. R.A. Bianco, to obtain aprovide litigation funding commitment to finance litigation with respect to the ongoing disputesCompany for litigation costs in connection with the Sponsors and the lenders in the 111 West 57th Street Property project, and to seek to recover value for the Company with respect to its equity investment in 111 West 57th Street Property, whether by direct recovery or from asserting claims against the Sponsors, their principals and/or certain of the lenders (collectively, "Future Recovery Litigation").

As a result of developments in theCompany’s legal proceedings concerningrelating to the Company'sCompany’s equity investment in the 111 West 57th Property,Property.

In 2019, after receiving approval from the Company's interest in obtaining a litigation funding commitment to finance litigation with respectSpecial Committee, the Company and Mr. R.A. Bianco entered into an amendment to the ongoing disputes with2017 LFA (the “2019 LFA Amendment”). In summary the Sponsors2019 LFA Amendment provided for the release of Mr. R.A. Bianco from all further funding obligations under the 2017 LFA and that, in the lenders inevent the Company receives any litigation proceeds from the 111 West 57th Street Property project, and the Company's efforts to seek to recover value for the Company with respect to its equity investment in the 111 West 57th Property, the Company's Board of Directors negotiated and accepted an offer from Mr. Richard Bianco, its long-time chief executive officer, to provide aLitigation, such litigation fund of seven million dollars ($7,000,000) (along with additional amounts as may be necessary from time to time as agreed to by the Company and Mr. Bianco), to fund the Company's litigation expenses in connection with Future Recovery Litigation, (the "Litigation Funding Agreement").

In consideration of such financial commitment, the Litigation Funding Agreement provides that any financial recovery in such Future Recovery Litigationproceeds shall be distributed as follows:


i.

(i)
first, 100% to reimburse Mr. Bianco on a dollar-for-dollar basis forthe Company in an amount equal $7,500,000; and


(ii)thereafter, any Company litigation expenses and/or other unpaidadditional amounts advanced by him in connection with Future Recovery Litigation; and
ii.
thereafter, a percentage of the recoveryshall be distributed (a) 75% to the Company and a percentage of the recovery(b) 25% to Mr. Bianco, respectively, (the "Recovery Sharing Ratio"); with the ratio and percentages of 30% to 45% depending on the length of time to obtain recovery.
R.A. Bianco.
The payment of the amounts pursuant to the Litigation Funding Agreement could become payable by the Company in the future based on the recovery by the Company of amounts relating to the 111 West 57th Property.  The recovery, by the Company, of any amounts are not within the control of the Company and cannot be predicted at this time, and therefore, the aggregate amounts funded pursuant to the Litigation Funding Agreement are presented in a temporary equity classification below total liabilities in the Company's consolidated balance sheets for the periods presented, until such time that the legal proceedings or the Litigation Funding Agreement are concluded. The Company shall not be obligated to repay such funded amounts except as described herein.
Legal expenses incurred attributable to the Litigation Funding Agreement are included in the Company's consolidated statements of operations as part of professional and outside services, as follows:

(in thousands)
 Year Ended 
  December 31, 2017  December 31, 2016 
Legal expenses attributable to the Litigation Funding Agreement $1,511    

In March 2018, Mr. R. A. Bianco funded an additional $588,000 of legal expenses pursuant to the Litigation Funding Agreement, for litigation services rendered in 2017 and 2018.

Note 1110Commitments and ContingenciesLoan(s) Payable – Related Party


Future minimum rental payments for office space under non-cancellable operating leases for the Company's executive office in Boca Raton, Florida as of December 31, 2017, were as follows (in thousands):

Year Amount 
2018 $14 
2019  3 
2020  - 
2021  - 
2022  - 
Thereafter  - 
  $17 

Rent expense for the period was as follows:

($ in thousands) Year Ended December 31, 2017  
Year Ended
December 31, 2016
 
Rent expense $13  $12 
Approximate square feet of leased office space  1,085   1,085 

Note 12 – Loans Payable

In May 2016, theThe Company and Mr. Richard A.R.A. Bianco the Company's Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer ("Mr. R. A. Bianco") entered into an agreementagreement(s) for Mr. R. A.R.A. Bianco to provide to the Company a secured working capital line of credit of up to one million dollars ($1,000,000) or additional amount(s) as may be necessary and agreed to on an as needed basis, if and when necessary, subject to customary and market terms and conditions to be agreed upon at such time (the "WC Agreement").

Pursuant to the WC Agreement, Mr. R. A. Bianco made several loanssenior loan(s) to the Company for use as working capital. The loans wereloan(s) are due on the earlier of the date the Company receivedreceives funds from any source, (excluding funds received by the Company by any litigation funding entity to fund any of the 111 West 57th legal proceedings), sufficient to pay all amounts due under the loans,loan(s), including all accrued interest thereon, including without limitation, from a settlement of the 111 West 57th legal proceedings or (b) the due date noted below. Accrued interest payable associated with the loans are included in accounts payabledate(s) indicated herein.

The Company and accrued liabilities in the Company's consolidated balance sheet. In January 2018,Mr. R.A. Bianco further agreed that amounts due pursuant to the WC Agreement,loan(s) plus interest can be converted by Mr. R.A. Bianco, at his option, into a litigation funding agreement pari-pasu with any litigation funding agreement entered into by the Company with a litigation funding entity.

Information regarding the loan(s) payable is as follows: ($ in thousands)

 
Date of loan(s)
 Rate 
 
Due Date
 
December 31,
2023
  
December 31,
2022
 
February 2023  6.50%February 28, 2025 
$
300
  
$
-
 
April 2023  6.50%April 30, 2025  
325
   
-
 
May 2023  6.50%May 31, 2025  
310
   
-
 
June 2023  7.00%June 30, 2025  
330
   
-
 
July 2023  7.00%July 31, 2025  
333
   
-
 
August 2023  7.00%August 31, 2025  
250
   
-
 
October 2023  7.00%October 31, 2025  
300
   
-
 
November 2023  7.00%November 30, 2025  
450
   
-
 
December 2023  7.00%December 31, 2025  
600
   
-
 
           $3,198  $- 

Information regarding accrued interest expense on the loan(s) payable is as follows:

 
(in thousands)
 
December 31,
2023
  
December 31,
2022
 
Accrued interest expense 
$
85
  
$
-
 

In January 2024, the Company and Mr. R.A. Bianco entered into an additional agreement pursuant to which Mr. R.A. Bianco made an additional $250,000 loan to the Company of $100,000 for use as working capital as reflected and in accordance with the same terms of the loansloan(s) payable noted herein.


Information
34

Table of Contents
AMBASE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
In February 2024, the Company and Mr. R.A. Bianco entered into additional agreement(s) pursuant to which Mr. R.A. Bianco made additional loan(s) to the Company of $50,000 and $100,000, for use as working capital in accordance with the same terms of the loan(s) payable noted herein.

In March 2024, the Company and Mr. R.A. Bianco entered into an additional agreement pursuant to which Mr. R.A. Bianco made an additional loan to the Company of $100,000, for use as working capital in accordance with the same terms of the loan(s) payable noted herein.

For additional information regarding the loans payable is as follows:

 
 
Date of Loan
 
 
Rate
 
 
Due Date
  December 31, 2017  December 31, 2016
Loan payableJanuary 2017 5.25% December 31, 2019 $500,000 $-
Loan payableApril 2017 5.25% December 31, 2019  500,000  -
Loan payableJune 2017 5.25% December 31, 2019  500,000  -
Loan payableSeptember 2017 5.25% December 31, 2019  150,000  -
Loan payableOctober 2017 5.25% December 31, 2019  446,000  -
Loan payableDecember 2017 5.25% December 31, 2019  200,000  -
       $2,296,000 $-

InformationCompany’s litigation funding effort, see Note 1. For additional information regarding accrued interest expense on the loans payable is as follows:

(in thousands) December 31, 2017  December 31, 2016 
Accrued interest expense $67  $- 

The amounts noted above pursuantCompany’s legal proceedings relating to the WC Agreement are distinct from the line of credit agreement for the 111 West 57th Property, including the Company’s challenge to the Strict Foreclosure, see Note 3 and Note 8.

Note 11 - Subsequent Events

The Company has performed a review of events subsequent to the balance sheet dated December 31, 2023, through the report issuance date. Other than as discussed herein, the Company has no events, subsequent to December 31, 2023, and through the date these consolidated financial statements were issued.

To provide the necessary cash resources to continue operations and continue the litigation related to the 111 West 57th Property, the Company has commenced a private placement offering (the “Equity Offering”) of 44,200,460 shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Shares”) to existing shareholders of the Company (the “Equity Offering”) in Note 4 herein and distinctreliance on the exemption from registration under Rule 506(c) of the Litigation Funding Agreement amountsSecurities Act of 1933, as discussedamended (the “Securities Act”). The purchase price for one share of Common Stock in Note 10 herein.

On January 26, 2018,the Equity Offering is $0.20. The Company expects to receive gross proceeds of approximately $8.8 million in connection with the sale byEquity Offering before deducting offering expenses.  There are no limitations on the Company’s use of such proceeds when received, although it is anticipated that a substantial part of the proceeds will be applied to repayment of existing Company obligations. The Shares are not being registered under the Securities Act and will be “restricted securities” under the Securities Act and will generally be subject to a minimum holding period of six months under Rule 144 before the Shares may be resold. The Shares will be offered and sold only to existing stockholders of record of the Company as of February 28, 2024 (the “Record Date”).  Each qualifying stockholder will be permitted to purchase up to his, her or its commercial office buildingpro rata share of the Shares in Greenwich, Connecticut,the Equity Offering, based on the amount of shares of Common Stock owned by such stockholder as of the Record Date, in an amount equal to up to one hundred and eight and one-half percent (108.5%) of the number of shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by such stockholder as of the Record Date. The Equity Offering commenced on or about February 28, 2024, and will remain open for a period of thirty (30) calendar days ending on March 29, 2024 (the “Subscription Deadline”). The Shares will be offered and sold pursuant to a Subscription Agreement (the “Subscription Agreement”) to be entered into by and between the Company repaidand each subscribing stockholder. In connection with the full amountEquity Offering, the Company has entered into a standby purchase agreement dated February 28, 2024 (the “SPA”) with BARC Investments, LLC (“BARC”), an affiliate of the working capital loan, plus accrued interest aggregating $2,623,000 to Mr. R.Company owned and controlled by Company directors Alessandra F. Bianco and Richard A. Bianco, Jr.  Under the terms of the SPA, BARC has agreed to act as standby a purchaser for all of the shares of common stock being offered in the Equity Offering that are not otherwise subscribed to by other stockholders prior to the Subscription Deadline.  Additional information about the Equity Offering, including the material terms and conditions of the working capital lineEquity Offering and information about how stockholders may subscribe for Shares in the Equity Offering, including the form of credit agreement was terminated. See Note 3 herein for additional information.Subscription Agreement, are set forth in the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on February 28, 2024.


ITEM 9.CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE


None.


ITEM 9A. 
ITEM 9A.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES


Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures


The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in its filings with the SEC is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time period specified in the SEC'sSEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management has recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management is required to apply judgment in evaluating its controls and procedures.


During the fiscal period covered by this report, the Company'sCompany’s management, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company'sCompany’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"“Exchange Act”)). Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2017.2023.


Management'sManagement’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting


Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. The Company'sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting is designed, under the supervision of the Company'sCompany’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP. The Company'sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that: (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company'sCompany’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.


The Company'sCompany’s management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company'sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017.2023.  This evaluation was based on the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (1992)(2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, or COSO, in 1992. The Company is in the process of adopting the COSO 2013 framework, and management expects to complete the transition from the COSO 1992 framework to the 2013 framework in 2018.Commission. All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations.  Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP.


Based on management'smanagement’s evaluation under the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (1992)(2013), management concluded that internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2017.2023.


This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company'sCompany’s independent public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management'sManagement’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company'sCompany’s independent public accounting firm pursuant to rules of the SEC that permit the Company to provide only management'smanagement’s report in this annual report.


Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in the Company'sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 20172023, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.


ITEM 9B.OTHER INFORMATION
36


ITEM 9B.OTHER INFORMATION

(a)
On March 18, 2024, after many years of exemplary service, Mr. Jerry Y. Carnegie formally informed AmBase Corporation (the “Company”) that he would not stand for re-election to the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) at the end of his current term in June 2024. Mr. Carnegie has served on the Company’s Board since June 2016, and serves as a member of the Company’s Personnel Committee and as the Chairman of the Company’s Accounting and Audit Committee. There are no disagreements between Mr. Carnegie and the Company. Disclosure is being made under this paragraph (a) of Item 9B of Form 10-K in lieu of Item 5.02 of Form 8-K.

(b)Not applicable.


ITEM 9C.DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS.

Not applicable.

PART III

ITEM 10.DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Information Concerning Directors Continuing in Office

Certain information concerning the directors of the Company whose terms do not expire in 2024 and who are continuing in office is set forth below.

Richard A. Bianco, 76. Mr. R. A. Bianco was elected a director of the Company in January 1991, and has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company since May 1991.  On January 26, 1993, Mr. R. A. Bianco was elected Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company.  He served as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Carteret Savings Bank, FA (“Carteret Savings” or “Carteret”), then a subsidiary of the Company, from May 1991 to December 1992.  Mr. R. A. Bianco has a unique background as the former President and Chief Executive Officer of Carteret Savings who was responsible for the Carteret Savings recapitalization efforts.  Mr. R. A. Bianco is the father of Alessandra F. Bianco and Richard A. Bianco, Jr., both of whom are members of the Board of Directors of the Company.  Mr. R. A. Bianco has detailed knowledge of the Company’s history including detailed knowledge of its current and prior legal and governmental proceedings.  Mr. R. A. Bianco additionally has knowledge in real estate, real estate investing and a background in lending and capital raising.  Based on these attributes combined with his prior investment banking, managerial and leadership experience, the Board of Directors has determined that Mr. R. A. Bianco is uniquely qualified to serve as a Director and the Chairman of the Company’s Board of Directors and that he has the requisite experience, qualifications, attributes, and skills necessary to serve as a member of the Board of Directors.

Alessandra F. Bianco, 44.  Ms. Bianco was elected a director of the Company in November 2012.  Ms. Bianco received a Bachelor of Arts at Boston College in 2003.  Ms. Bianco worked in the Office of the President at American Bible Society from 2009 through 2013.  Prior to her current work, Ms. Bianco worked as an assistant to the Head of the Investment Banking department at Broadpoint Capital.  Ms. Bianco is the daughter of Richard A. Bianco, the Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company.  Since March 2009, Ms. Bianco has been a senior officer of BARC Investments LLC.  Ms. Bianco, through BARC LLC, is one of the largest stockholders of the Company, and thus has a direct interest in the Company optimizing stockholder value.  The Board of Directors has determined that Ms. Bianco is well qualified to serve as a member of the Company’s Board of Directors and that she has the requisite experience, qualifications, attributes, and skills necessary to serve as a member of the Board of Directors.

Richard A. Bianco, Jr., 40.  Mr. Bianco, Jr. was elected a director of the Company in June 2016.  Mr. Bianco, Jr. received a Bachelor of Science degree in Finance at Boston College in 2006.  Mr. Bianco, Jr. has been working with the Company since September 2006.  Prior to his work with AmBase, Mr. Bianco, Jr. worked for UBS Financial Services.  Mr. Bianco, Jr. is the son of Richard A. Bianco, the Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company.  Mr. Bianco, Jr. is a senior officer of BARC Investments LLC.  Mr. Bianco, Jr., through BARC LLC, is one of the largest stockholders of the Company and has a direct interest in the Company optimizing stockholder value.  The Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Bianco, Jr. is well qualified to serve as a member of the Company’s Board of Directors and that he has the requisite experience, qualifications, attributes and skills necessary to serve as a member of the Board of Directors.

Jerry Y. Carnegie, 72. Mr. Carnegie was elected a director of the Company in June 2016, having previously been a member of the Board from January 2009 to June 2015.  Mr. Carnegie is a member of the Fellow of Society of Actuaries and a Certified Financial Planner.  For the last several years he has worked independently assisting individuals with financial planning.  Mr. Carnegie spent 25 years with Hewitt Associates as a Senior Actuary, representing major corporations in their pension and benefit plan work.  Mr. Carnegie received an A.B. Mathematics degree from Princeton University.  Mr. Carnegie’s financial expertise, background in financial planning and pension and benefit consulting provides the board with insight into financial decisions and financial considerations, as well as a valuable perspective to the Company’s financial matters and proceedings.  The Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Carnegie is well qualified to serve as a member of the Company’s Board of Directors and that he has the requisite experience, qualifications, attributes, and skills necessary to serve as a member of the Board of Directors.

Scott M. Salant, 59.  Mr. Salant was elected a director of the Company in January 2023. He is a partner at the firm, DelBello Donnellan Weingarten Wise & Wiederkehr LLP, based in White Plains, New York. Mr. Salant is a graduate of the University of Chicago and the Boston University School of Law and has practiced in the area of commercial litigation for several decades. He is admitted to both the New York and Massachusetts bar and has experience in a wide range of commercial litigation areas. He handles cases in a variety of jurisdictions and venues, including state and federal courts, and arbitrations. Mr. Salant has an understanding of the Company’s history including knowledge of its current and prior legal proceedings. Mr. Salant’s current background and legal expertise in many areas of law provides the Board with a valuable perspective and insight into the legal process and the New York State Courts, which is important to the Company’s current legal proceedings. The Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Salant is well qualified to serve as a Director of the Company and he has the requisite experience, qualifications, attributes, and skills necessary to serve as a member of the Board of Directors.

Information Concerning Executive Officers

John Ferrara, 61, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Controller.  Mr. Ferrara was elected to the position of Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Controller of the Company in December 1995, having previously served as Acting Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Assistant Vice President and Controller since January 1995; as Assistant Vice President and Controller from January 1992 to January 1995; and as Manager of Financial Reporting from December 1988 to January 1992.

Joseph R. Bianco, 78, Treasurer. Mr. J. Bianco was elected to the position of Treasurer of the Company in January 1998.  He has dedicated his career to the financial services and investment industry.  Prior to his employment with the Company in 1996, he worked for Merrill Lynch & Co. (“Merrill”) as Vice President, responsible for Sales and Marketing in the Merrill Global Securities Clearing office from 1983 to 1996.  Mr. Joseph R. Bianco and Mr. Richard A. Bianco are related.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Based solely upon a review of the forms filed with the SEC and written representations received by the Company, pursuant to the requirements of Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, the Company believes that, during 2023, there were no transactions with respect to the Company’s equity securities which were not reported on a timely basis to the SEC, no late reports nor other failure to file a required form by any director or officer of the Company.

Nomination of Directors

There have been no material changes to the procedures by which security holders may recommend nominees to the Company’s Board of Directors as previously described in the Company’s definitive proxy statement on Schedule 14A as filed with the SEC on March 30, 2023.

Audit Committee Matters

The Company is not a “listed issuer” as such term is defined in Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act and is not required to provide the disclosure set forth under Item 407(d)(4) of Regulation S-K. The Accounting and Audit Committee currently consists of Mr. Carnegie, Chairman, Ms. Bianco and Mr. Salant. The Board of Directors determined Mr. Carnegie is an “audit committee financial expert” as that term is defined in Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K.

Code of Ethics

We have adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and other senior officers as well as all employees with respect to policies and procedures relating to trading in the Company’s securities.  A copy of the Code of Ethics was filed with the SEC as Exhibit 14 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023.

Insider Trading Policies and Procedures

The Company’s Code of Ethics includes insider trading policies and procedures governing the purchase, sale, and/or other dispositions of the Company’s securities by directors, officers, and employees.  The Code of Ethics requires compliance with all applicable laws, rules and regulations governing the offer and sale of securities and prohibits directors, officers, and employees from engaging in transactions in the Company’s securities while in possession of material nonpublic information until at least two trading days have elapsed from the date of public announcement of such nonpublic information.  The Company has designated a compliance officer under the Code of Ethics to oversee compliance with and enforcement of the Code of Ethics, including the insider trading provisions.

ITEM 11.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

COMPENSATION NARRATIVE

The following compensation narrative describes the material elements of compensation for the Company’s officers identified in the Summary Compensation Table (“Named Executive Officers”). As more fully described above herein, the Personnel Committee consists of two independent directors of the Company.

The Personnel Committee is responsible for establishing the Company’s compensation programs, including benefit plans, retirement plans and the Company’s stock option program, including approving the granting of stock option awards to the Company’s officers and employees.  The Personnel Committee annually reviews and approves all compensation decisions relating to the Company’s officers, including Named Executive Officers.

The day-to-day design and administration of health, welfare and paid time-off plans and policies applicable to salaried employees in general are handled by the Company’s management.  The Personnel Committee is responsible for certain plan design changes outside the day-to-day requirements necessary to maintain these plans and policies.

The Personnel Committee has the ability to, and may from time to time, utilize the services of independent compensation consultants or other outside advisors in reviewing the Company’s compensation programs, as it deems necessary. The Personnel Committee did not utilize the services of any compensation consultants in 2023.

Objectives of the Compensation Program

The Personnel Committee’s overall objective in administering the Company’s compensation programs is to attract, motivate and retain qualified personnel, reward corporate performance and recognize individual contributions on both a short-term and long-term basis.  The Personnel Committee seeks to align the interests of these executives with those of the Company’s stockholders by encouraging stock ownership by executive officers to promote a proprietary interest in the Company’s success and to provide incentives to achieve the Company’s goals.  In furtherance of these objectives, the Company’s executive compensation policies are designed to focus the executive officers on the Company’s goals.  The Personnel Committee determines salary, bonuses and equity incentives based upon the performance of the individual executive officer and the Company.  Management compensation is intended to be set at levels that the Personnel Committee believes fully reflect the challenges confronted by management.

The Company strives to provide a combined, overall competitive salary and benefits package, including annual cash bonus incentives, to retain qualified personnel who are familiar with the Company’s operations and critical to the long-term success of the Company.  The Company rewards personnel for contributions to a variety of matters, including the pursuit of claims, recovery of claims, compromising of actual and contingent liabilities, and attention to the maintenance of a controlled level of expenditures.  Cash bonus incentives are utilized to reward above average corporate performance and recognize individual initiative and achievements which provide immediate and/or long-term value to the Company.  Due to the nature of the Company’s operations, which are focused on the recovery of assets, with an emphasis on the 111 West 57th legal proceedings and a previous emphasis on the recovery of the Company’s investment in Carteret through the Supervisory Goodwill litigation (which was settled in October 2012, pursuant to which the Company received a settlement award of $180,650,000), the minimization of the income tax impact of settlement awards, and other proceedings, the Personnel Committee has continued its strategy of compensation through programs that provide an incentive for performance and for contributions to the Company’s operations and efforts to realize recoveries, achieve asset appreciation, eliminate liabilities and control costs.

Elements of Compensation

The Company’s total compensation program for its officers consists of competitive market salaries, annual cash bonus awards, other benefits such as health and other insurance programs, a retirement plan in the form of a 401(k) Savings Plan, which is a qualified plan within the meaning of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) and may include stock option or other equity awards.

Due to cost considerations, administrative requirements and as part of an overall compensation philosophy, the Company seeks to maintain a minimal level of benefit programs and other perquisites. Section 162(m) of the Code, as amended, imposes a limitation on the deduction for certain executive officers’ compensation. The Company has paid in the past, and reserves the right to pay in the future, compensation that is not deductible if it believes it is in the best interests of the Company.  The Personnel Committee considered the provisions of Section 162(m) with regard to compensation paid for 2023.

Base Annual Salary

Base annual salaries for Named Executive Officers are determined initially by evaluating the responsibilities of the position, the experience of the individual and the competition in the marketplace for management talent, and also may include comparison with companies confronting problems of the magnitude and complexity faced by the Company.

Base annual salaries are intended to be competitive with the overall marketplace, commensurate with the qualifications and experience of the Named Executive Officer.  The Company’s compensation structure is intended to provide the necessary incentive to retain and motivate qualified personnel.  Individuals are encouraged to add value and provide benefit in all aspects of the Company’s operations currently and in the future.

Base annual salaries and salary adjustments are evaluated on a number of factors, both internal and external in nature.  The most important factor is the executive’s performance and contribution to the Company, followed by the performance of the Company, any increased responsibilities assumed by the executive and the competition in the marketplace for similarly experienced executives.

The salaries of the Named Executive Officers are reviewed on an annual basis, typically at the end of each year and may also be adjusted from time to time based on changes in responsibilities, changes in benefit programs or as a result of other external and economic factors.  No salary changes were made to the Company’s executive officers during 2023 and 2022.

Annual Bonus Awards

The Company paid no bonuses for 2023 and 2022 to Mr. R. A. Bianco, Mr. Ferrara or Mr. J. Bianco.

Participation Interest

On June 28, 2013, the Company, through a newly formed subsidiary, purchased an equity interest in a real estate development property through a joint venture agreement to purchase and develop real property located at 105 through 111 West 57th Street in New York, New York (the “111 West 57th Property”), as further described under the heading “Operating Agreement of 111 West 57th Investment LLC.”  The Company’s interests in the joint venture are held through 111 West 57th Investment LLC (the “Investment LLC”).

In March 2014, the Company entered into an amended and restated operating agreement for the Investment LLC (the “Amended and Restated Investment Operating Agreement”) to grant a 10% subordinated participation interest in the Investment LLC to Mr. R. A. Bianco as incentive compensation for Mr. R. A. Bianco’s past, current and anticipated ongoing role to develop and commercialize the Company’s equity investment in the 111 West 57th Property.  Pursuant to the terms of the Amended and Restated Investment Operating Agreement, Mr. R. A. Bianco has no voting rights with respect to his interest in the Investment LLC, and his right to receive 10% of the distributions from the Investment LLC is subject to the Company first receiving distributions equal to 150% of the Company’s initial aggregate $57,250,000 investment in the Investment LLC, plus any additional investments by the Company if any, and only with respect to any distributions thereafter.

The Board of Directors approved the Company entering into the Amended and Restated Investment Operating Agreement with Mr. R.A. Bianco.  Mr. R.A. Bianco, Mr. Bianco Jr. and Ms. Bianco recused themselves from the deliberations and voting of the Board of Directors in considering the Amended and Restated Investment Operating Agreement.

Litigation Funding Agreement

In 2017, the Company entered into a Litigation Funding Agreement (the “LFA”) with Mr. R. A. Bianco. Pursuant to the LFA, Mr. R. A. Bianco agreed to provide litigation funding to the Company, up to an aggregate amount of seven million dollars ($7,000,000) (the “Litigation Fund Amount”) to satisfy actual documented litigation costs and expenses of the Company, including attorneys’ fees, expert witness fees, consulting fees and disbursements in connection with the Company’s legal proceedings relating to the Company’s equity investment in the 111 West 57th Property.

After receiving substantial AMT credit carryforward refunds in 2019, in light of the Company’s improved liquidity, the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) authorized the establishment of a Special Committee of the Board (the “Special Committee”) to evaluate and negotiate possible changes to the LFA. The Special Committee was comprised of Mr. Schmidt and Mr. Carnegie.

In 2019, after receiving approval from the Special Committee, the Company and Mr. R. A. Bianco entered into an amendment to the LFA (the “Amendment”) which provides for the following: (i) the repayment of $3,672,000 in funds previously provided to the Company by Mr. R. A. Bianco pursuant to the LFA (the “Advanced Amount”), (ii) the release of Mr. R. A. Bianco from all further funding obligations under the LFA, and (iii) a modification of the relative distribution between Mr. R. A. Bianco and the Company of any Litigation Proceeds received by the Company from the 111 West 57th Litigation, as described below.

The Amendment provides that, in the event that the Company receives any Litigation Proceeds from the 111 West 57th Litigation, such Litigation Proceeds shall be distributed as follows:

(i)
first, 100% to the Company in an amount equal to the lesser of (a) the amount of actual litigation expenses incurred by the Company with respect to the Company’s 111 West 57th Litigation (including the Advanced Amount); or (b) $7,500,000; and

(ii)
thereafter, any additional amounts shall be distributed (a) 75% to the Company and (b) 25% to the Mr. R. A. Bianco (a reduction of Mr. R.A. Bianco’s percentage, which under the terms of the original LFA prior to the Amendment would have been 30% to 45% based on the length of time of any recovery).

The Special Committee was dissolved in 2019.

2007 Employment Agreement with the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer

An employment agreement, as amended, is in effect between Mr. R. A. Bianco and the Company (the "2007“2007 Employment Agreement"Agreement”), which provides for him to serve as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company through May 31, 2028.  The employment agreement also provides for additional benefits, including his participation in various employment benefit plans and annual bonus eligibility for work performed on non-Supervisory Goodwill activities.

During 2006, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Mr. R. A. Bianco (the “2007 Employment Agreement”).  As part of the 2007 Employment Agreement terms:  (i) Mr. R. A. Bianco’s annual rate of base salary was $625,000 per year during the first three years of the 2007 Employment Agreement with the amount of Mr. R. A. Bianco’s base salary for subsequent years to be determined by the Personnel Committee, in its sole discretion; and (ii) Mr. R. A. Bianco’s annual bonus opportunity each year was no longer linked to recovery efforts in connection with the Company’s Supervisory Goodwill litigation.  Instead, the Company and Mr. R. A. Bianco agreed to a long term incentive bonus formula, at varying percentages ranging from 5% to 10%, or more, based upon recoveries received by the Company for its investment in Carteret, through litigation or otherwise (including the Company’s Supervisory Goodwill litigation).

Retirement/Pension Benefits

401(k) Savings Plan

The only retirement type plan maintained by the Company is the Company’s 401(k) Savings Plan (the “Savings Plan”).  Pursuant to the terms of the Savings Plan, employees can make contributions which are 100% matched by the Company.  The employee and the employer matching contribution are subject to the maximum limitations as set forth in the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

The Company’s matching contributions to the Savings Plan on behalf of the Named Executive Officers aggregated approximately $90,000 in 2023 and $81,000 in 2022.

Other Benefits

The Company provides only a limited number of additional benefits and perquisites. Such additional items, to the extent provided, are included as Other Compensation in the Summary Compensation table presented herein. The benefits and other perquisites are reasonably consistent with general competitive market practices.

Items provided by the Company include, depending on the Named Executive Officer, Company paid term life insurance at up to two times the individual’s base annual salary, Company paid long-term disability insurance with a monthly benefit up to 60% of the individual’s base monthly salary, supplemental medical and dental coverage for costs not covered under the base health insurance plans, and depending on the Named Executive Officer, reimbursement for income tax services and Company provided transportation. Health and welfare plans are provided through outside insurance carriers. Benefits generally available to all full-time employees of the Company are not included herein.

The Company does not provide any other type of deferred compensation programs, nor does it provide or have outstanding loans with the Named Executive Officers or any other employee of the Company.

Personnel Committee Summary

The Personnel Committee believes that its compensation programs, mixing equity and cash incentives, will continue to focus the efforts of the Company’s executive officers on long-term growth for the benefit of the Company and its stockholders.  The Personnel Committee has found all the components of Company’s officers’ compensation to be fair, reasonable and appropriate.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The following table sets forth the information regarding compensation earned by the Chief Executive Officer and each other executive officer of the Company and its subsidiaries (the “Named Executive Officers”) with respect to services rendered to the Company in the fiscal years ended December 31, 2023, and December 31, 2022:

Summary Compensation Table (a)
Name and Principal Position Year 
($)
Salary
  
($)
Bonus
  
($) (c)
All Other Compensation
  
($)
Total
 
               
Richard A. Bianco, Chairman
 2023 
$
440,000
  
$
-
  
$
98,735
  
$
538,735
 
President and Chief Executive
 2022 
$
440,000
  
$
-
  
$
94,519
  
$
534,519
 
Officer (b)
                  
                   
John Ferrara, Vice President
 2023 
$
235,000
  
$
-
  
$
44,324
  
$
279,324
 
Chief Financial Officer &
 2022 
$
235,000
  
$
-
  
$
41,084
  
$
276,084
 
Controller
                  
                   
Joseph R. Bianco
 2023 
$
116,000
  
$
-
  
$
47,002
  
$
163,002
 
Treasurer
 2022 
$
116,000
  
$
-
  
$
43,774
  
$
159,774
 

(a)
The columns relating to “Stock Option Awards,” “Stock Awards,” “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation,” and “Non-qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings” have been omitted because no compensation required to be reported in these columns were awarded to, earned by, or paid to any of the Named Executive Officers with respect to 2023 or 2022.

(b)
See the discussion under the heading “Employment Contracts” below for information relating to the 2007 Employment Agreement between Mr. R. A. Bianco and the Company and the amounts which could be payable to Mr. R. A. Bianco based on value realized by the Company with respect to a gross-up for federal taxes imposed on the settlement amount, if any.

(c)
All Other Compensation for fiscal year 2023, in the table above consists of the following:

  Mr. R. A. Bianco  Mr. Ferrara  Mr. J. Bianco 
          
Company contributions to 401(k) savings plan 
$
30,000
  
$
30,000
  
$
30,000
 
Supplemental life insurance premiums  
8,750
   
555
   
2,461
 
Long-term disability insurance premiums  
18,804
   
693
   
693
 
Supplemental medical and dental insurance  
11,856
   
12,264
   
11,856
 
Reimbursement of income tax costs for participation in life insurance plans  
5,420
   
344
   
1,524
 
Reimbursement of income tax costs for participation in long-term disability plans  
12,116
   
468
   
468
 
Company provided automobile (d)  
1,914
   
-
   
-
 
Reimbursement for tax services  
9,875
   
-
   
-
 
Total 
$
98,735
  
$
44,324
  
$
47,002
 

(d)
All All amounts for personal use of a Company-provided automobile for Mr. R. A. Bianco, included in table above for other compensation, include mileage, fuel, maintenance, insurance, and other miscellaneous fees.

Pay vs. Performance Table
Year 
Summary Compensation
Table Total for
PEO (a) (c)
  
Compensation
Actually Paid to
PEO (a) (c)
  
Average
Summary
Compensation
Table Total for
Non-PEO NEOs
(b) (c)
  
Average
Compensation
Actually Paid
to Non-PEO
NEOs (b) (c)
  
Value of Initial
Fixed $100
Investment
Based On
Total
Shareholder
Return (d)
  
Net Income
(Loss) (d)
 
                   
2023 
$
538,735
  
$
440,000
  
$
221,163
  
$
175,500
  
$
38.96
  
$
(5,271,000
)
                         
2022 
$
534,519
  
$
440,000
  
$
217,929
  
$
175,500
  
$
18.18
  
$
(3,473,000
)
                         
2021 
$
533,212
  
$
440,000
  
$
216,758
  
$
175,500
  
$
90.91
  
$
(5,208,000
)

(a)
PEO in all years presented above is Richard A. Bianco

(b)
Non-PEO NEO’s in all years presented above are John Ferrara and Joseph R. Bianco

(c)In all years presented above, “Compensation Actually Paid to PEO” and “Average Compensation Actually Paid to Non-PEO NEOs” is the amounts shown in the Summary Table, “Total” column less amounts shown in the “All Other Compensation”, column.

(d)
Due to the nature of the Company’s operations, the Company does not believe there is a correlation between the compensation actually paid to the PEO or the average compensation actually paid to the Non-PEO NEOs to the Company’s cumulative total shareholder return or the Company’s net income (loss) in the periods presented.

Grants of Plan Based Awards During 2023

No stock options, SARs, or any other type of stock award grants were granted to the Named Executive Officers during the year ended December 31, 2023.

No long-term incentive plan awards were made to the Named Executive Officers in 2023. The Company does not have any stock options, SARs or other stock award grants outstanding, hence no stock options previously awarded to any of the Named Executive Officers were repriced during 2023.

Outstanding Equity Awards at December 31, 2023

The Company does not have any stock options, SARs or other stock award grants outstanding.

Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table during Fiscal 2023

The Company has no stock options outstanding; hence, there were no stock options exercised or vested during 2023.

EMPLOYMENT CONTRACTS

2007 Employment Agreement with the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer

An employment agreement, as amended, is in effect between Mr. R. A. Bianco and the Company, (the “2007 Employment Agreement”).  The terms of the 2007 Employment Agreement provide for Mr. R. A. Bianco to serve as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company. In MarchJanuary 2018, the Company and Mr. R. A. Bianco agreed to an amendment to Mr. Bianco'sBianco’s Employment Agreement with the Company, to extend the term of Mr. R. A. Bianco'sBianco’s employment with the Company to May 31, 20232028 from May 31, 20182023 (the "Employment Period"“Employment Period”). Under the terms of the 2007 Employment Agreement, Mr. R. A. Bianco was entitled to receive an annual base salary of $625,000 for the first three (3) years and was then eligible for discretionary increases to the amount of his base salary in subsequent years. The 2007 Employment Agreement provides for discretionary annual bonuses (which may not take into consideration his efforts to obtain a recovery for the Company is providingof its investment in Carteret Savings), employee benefit plans participation, and certain long-term disability benefits.  The 2007 Employment Agreement provides a long-term incentive arrangement for Mr. R. A. Bianco (the “Long-Term Incentive Award”); based upon receipt by the disclosureCompany of a recovery of its investment in Carteret Savings through litigation or otherwise (including the Company’s Supervisory Goodwill litigation) (the “Recovery Amount”), Mr. Bianco's amended employment agreement under Item 9BR. A. Bianco would receive, with certain exceptions, a lump-sum payment equal to a percentage of Form 10-K in lieu of Item 5.02 of Form 8-K.that recovery, as follows:

PART III


ITEM 10.
DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCELong-Term Incentive Award = 5% of the first $50,000,000 of Recovery Amount;


Information concerning executive officers

Plus


8% of Recovery Amount in excess of $50,000,000 but not greater than $150,000,000;


Plus


10% of Recovery Amount in excess of $150,000,000 but not greater than $250,000,000;


Plus


Discretionary amount (not less than 10%), to be determined by the Board, of Recovery Amount in excess of $250,000,000.

Pursuant to the terms of the 2007 Employment Agreement between Mr. R. A. Bianco and directors requiredthe Company as amended, and the receipt by this item willthe Company of $180,650,000 as part of the Supervisory Goodwill legal proceedings Settlement Agreement, in 2012 Mr. R. A. Bianco received a bonus payment as calculated in accordance with the 2007 Employment Agreement.  Additional amounts to be determined could be due to Mr. R. A. Bianco pursuant to the 2007 Employment Agreement, based on value realized by the Company with respect to a gross-up for federal taxes imposed on the settlement amount, if any.

Under the terms of the 2007 Employment Agreement, if no recovery has been obtained by the Company by the expiration of the 2007 Employment Agreement, the Company and Mr. R. A. Bianco could enter into a consulting arrangement pursuant to which, following his employment with the Company, he would continue to provide services to the Company as an independent contractor, solely for the purpose of assisting the Company in obtaining such a recovery.

Any further Long-Term Incentive Award to Mr. R. A. Bianco is to be paid in the future (i.e., whether during or after the Employment Period and/or the Consulting Period) except if Mr. R. A. Bianco willfully refuses to cooperate in a reasonable fashion with the Company and/or the Board in connection with the Company’s efforts to obtain a Recovery Amount, in which case he would forfeit his entitlement to receive any further Long-Term Incentive Award.

During the Employment Period, if Mr. R. A. Bianco voluntarily resigns or has his employment with the Company terminated by the Company for cause (as set forth in the Company's definitive Proxy Statement2007 Employment Agreement), Mr. R. A. Bianco will forfeit his entitlement to receive any further Long-Term Incentive Award. If Mr. R. A. Bianco becomes disabled (as set forth in the 2007 Employment Agreement) or dies, Mr. R. A. Bianco or his estate, as applicable, would be entitled to receive any further Long-Term Incentive Award upon the Company’s receipt of the Recovery Amount, regardless of when the Recovery Amount is received by the Company. If the Company terminates Mr. R. A. Bianco’s employment with the Company without cause, Mr. R. A. Bianco or his estate, as applicable would be entitled to receive any further Long-Term Incentive Award upon the Company’s receipt of the Recovery Amount, regardless of when the Recovery Amount is received by the Company.

Mr. R. A. Bianco’s employment under the 2007 Employment Agreement automatically terminates if Mr. R. A. Bianco dies during the term of the Employment Period and can be terminated by the Company at its option for cause (as set forth in the 2007 Employment Agreement) or Mr. R. A. Bianco’s inability to engage in any substantial gainful activity (as set forth in the 2007 Employment Agreement).

In the event the Company terminates Mr. R. A. Bianco’s employment for any reason other than those permitted pursuant to the 2007 Employment Agreement, Mr. R. A. Bianco would be entitled to receive a lump-sum amount equal to the salary payments provided for in the 2007 Employment Agreement for the remaining term thereof, following the passage of a six (6) month period from the date of his termination.  As of December 31, 2023, the aggregate lump-sum amount of such salary payments, pursuant to the 2007 Employment Agreement as amended, would be approximately $2,760,000.

Operating Agreement of 111 West 57th Investment LLC

In June 2013, 111 West 57th Investment LLC (“Investment LLC”), a then newly formed subsidiary of the Company, entered into a joint venture agreement (as amended, the “JV Agreement”) with 111 West 57th Sponsor LLC, (the “Sponsor”), pursuant to which Investment LLC invested (the “Investment”) in a real estate development property to purchase and develop the 111 West 57th Property.  In consideration for making the Investment, Investment LLC was granted a membership interest in 111 West 57th Partners LLC (“111 West 57th Partners”), which indirectly acquired the 111 West 57th Property on June 28, 2013 (the “Joint Venture,” and such date, the “Closing Date”).  The Company also indirectly contributed an additional amount to the Joint Venture in exchange for an additional indirect interest in the Joint Venture.  Other members and the Sponsor contributed additional cash and/or property to the Joint Venture. The Company recorded its Annual Meetinginvestment in 111 West 57th Partners utilizing the equity method of Shareholdersaccounting. The Joint Venture plans were to redevelop the 111 West 57th Property into a luxury residential tower and retail project.

The JV Agreement and related operating agreements generally provide that all distributable cash shall be distributed as follows: (i) first, 100% to the members in proportion to their percentage interests until Investment LLC has received distributions yielding a 20% internal rate of return as calculated; (ii) second, 100% to the Sponsor as a return of (but not a return on) any additional capital contributions made by the Sponsor on account of manager overruns; and (iii) thereafter, (a) 50% to the members in proportion to their respective percentage interests at the time of such distribution, and (b) 50% to the Sponsor.

In March 2014, the Company entered into an amended and restated operating agreement for Investment LLC (the “Amended and Restated Investment Operating Agreement”) to grant a 10% subordinated participation interest in Investment LLC to Mr. R. A. Bianco as contingent future incentive for Mr. R. A. Bianco’s past, current and anticipated ongoing role to develop and commercialize the Company’s equity investment in the 111 West 57th Property.  Pursuant to the terms of the Amended and Restated Investment Operating Agreement, Mr. R.A. Bianco has no voting rights with respect to his interest in Investment LLC, and his entitlement to receive 10% of the distributions from Investment LLC is subject to the Company first receiving distributions equal to 150% of the Company’s initial aggregate investment in Investment LLC and the Joint Venture, plus any additional investments by the Company, and only with respect to any distributions thereafter. At the current time the Company has not expensed nor accrued any amounts relating to this subordinated participation interest, as no amount or range of amounts can be reasonably estimated or assured.

During 2014, in connection with the funding of additional capital calls under the JV Agreement for required borrowing and development costs for the 111 West 57th Property, the Company’s management and its Board of Directors concluded that, given the continuing development risks of the 111 West 57th Property and the Company’s financial position, the Company should not at that time increase its already significant concentration and risk exposure to the 111 West 57th Property.  Nonetheless, the Company sought to limit dilution of its interest in the Joint Venture resulting from any failure to fund the capital call requirements, but at the same time wished to avoid the time, expense and financial return requirements (with attendant dilution and possible loss of voting rights) that obtaining a replacement third-party investor would require. The Company therefore entered into a second amended and restated operating agreement for Investment LLC (“Second Amended and Restated Investment Operating Agreement”) pursuant to which Capital LLC was admitted as a member of Investment LLC. In exchange for Capital LLC contributing toward Investment LLC capital calls in respect of the 111 West 57th Property, available cash of Investment LLC will be distributed first to Capital LLC until it has received a 20% internal rate of return (calculated as provided for in the JV Agreement as noted above), second to the Company until it has received 150% of its capital, and, thereafter, available cash is split 10/90, with 10% going to Mr. R. A. Bianco as the subordinated participation interest noted above and 90% going to Capital LLC and the Company pari-passu, with Capital LLC receiving one-half of its pro-rata share based on capital contributed and the Company receiving the balance. No other material changes were made to the Amended and Restated Investment Operating Agreement, and neither Mr. R. A. Bianco nor Capital LLC has any voting rights with respect to their interest and investment in Investment LLC.

Because of time constraints, concerns regarding the potential level of any financial dilution, complications relating to structure of the investments in the Joint Venture, bank constraints and potential loss of voting rights over the Joint Venture, the terms of Capital LLC’s admission to and investment in the Investment LLC were reviewed by the Board of Directors and determined to be held on June 7, 2018, which is incorporated herein by reference, whichno less favorable to the Company intends to filethan would have been obtained in negotiations with a third party unaffiliated with the SecuritiesCompany, even assuming that any such third party investor was available and Exchange Commissionprepared to fund under the time constraints imposed by the JV Agreement. Based in part on such determination, the Board of Directors unanimously approved the admission of Capital LLC to Investment LLC on the terms described by a vote of the disinterested members of the Board of Directors. In April 2015, Capital LLC contributed an additional amount toward Investment LLC capital calls in respect of the 111 West 57th Property.

In July 2015, based on available net proceeds received from the financing and equity previously invested in the project, funds were distributed to the members of 111 West 57th Partners (the “July 2015 Distribution”).  As part of the July 2015 Distribution, in accordance with the Second Amended and Restated Investment Operating Agreement as noted herein, the Company through Investment LLC repaid Capital LLC the full amount of its capital contributions of $9,868,000.  Additional amounts may still be payable to Capital LLC based on investment returns received on the 111 West 57th Property as further described herein.

Pension Benefits

Other than the Company’s 401(k) Savings Plan, the Company maintains no other retirement or deferred compensation type plans.

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

The Company does not latermaintain any other type of nonqualified deferred compensation plan.

Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control

Other than 120 daysMr. R. A. Bianco, there are no employment agreements or employment contracts with any other officer or employee of the Company. See Employment Contracts above, for information concerning potential payments due to Mr. R. A. Bianco upon termination, pursuant to the employment agreement between Mr. R. A. Bianco and the Company.

The Company does not have any severance or termination payment plans in effect.

COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS

The annual fee paid to each director of the Company, including Mr. R. A. Bianco, who is the Company’s Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, is $12,000 per year.  Mr. R. A. Bianco elected not to receive his annual director fee for 2023.  In addition, each Chairperson and/or Co-Chairperson of a Board committee is paid an additional fee of $1,000 per year, and after four (4) Board and/or committee meetings, each director is paid a $500 per meeting attendance fee. Pursuant to the Company’s By-Laws, directors may be compensated for additional services for the Board of Directors or for any committee at the request of the Chairman of the Board or the Chairman of any committee.

Directors Compensation Table

Details of amounts paid to the Company’s directors in their capacities as directors and/or board committee members for the year ending December 31, 2023, is as follows:

Name and Position 
Fees Earned
or Paid in
Cash
   
Totals
(a) (b)
  
Richard A. Bianco
       
Chairman of the Board, President
       
and Chief Executive Officer
 
$
-
 
 (a)
 
$
-
 (a)
          
Alessandra F. Bianco
         
Board Member
         
Member Audit Committee
 
$
12,000
   
$
12,000
  
          
Richard A. Bianco, Jr.
         
Board Member
 
$
12,000
   
$
12,000
 
          
Jerry Y. Carnegie
         
Board Member
         
Chairman Audit Committee
         
Member Personnel Committee
 
$
13,000
   
$
13,000
 
          
Scott M. Salant
         
Board Member
         
Member Audit Committee
         
Chairman Personnel Committee
 
$
13,000
   
$
13,000
 

(a)
Mr. R. A. Bianco waived payment of his director fees in 2023.

(b)
No other additional fees or any other type of compensation, including equity, non-equity and/or deferred compensation payments or awards were paid or granted to any of the Company’s outside directors in 2023.

Personnel Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

The members of the Personnel Committee during 2023 were Scott M. Salant, Chairperson, and Jerry Y. Carnegie.  Kenneth M. Schmidt served as Chairperson until the end of its 2017 fiscal year.

Code of Ethics

We have adoptedhis term in June 2023.  No executive officer serves, or in the past has served, as a Code of Ethics that applies to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and other senior officers.  A copymember of the CodeBoard of Ethics was filedDirectors or Personnel Committee of any entity that has any of its executive officers serving as a member of the Company’s Board of Directors or Personnel Committee.

ITEM 12.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

None.

Stock Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners

The following information is set forth with the SEC as Exhibit 14respect to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.

ITEM 11.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

For the information required to be set forthpersons known by the Company in response to this item, see the Company's definitive Proxy Statement for its Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on June 7, 2018, under the captions "Executive Compensation," "Employment Contracts," and "Compensationbeneficial owners of Directors" which are incorporated herein by reference, which the Company intends to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission not latermore than 120 days after the end of its 2017 fiscal year.

ITEM 12.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The following table summarizes information about securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans5% of the Company at December 31, 2017outstanding Common Stock, the Company’s only class of voting securities, as follows:of March 15, 2024, except as set forth below.


 
 
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
 
Amount and Nature
of Beneficial
Ownership
   
Percentage
of Common
Stock Owned
 
        
BARC Investments, LLC
  
60,400,260
 (a)  
70.9
%
c/o Barry Strauss & Associates
 (direct)      
307 Fifth Avenue
         
New York, NY  10016
         
          
Camac Partners, LLC
  2,257,055(b)  5.5
%
350 Park Avenue, 13th floor
         
New York, NY 10022
         

(a)Shares
Ownership amount reported is based on a Schedule 13D/A Filed by BARC Investments, LLC on March 8, 2024, and assumes that in the absence of any subsequent amendments to be issued upon exercisesuch Schedule 13D/A that the amounts reported therein have not changed.  Includes the right to acquire up to 44,200,460 shares of outstanding options
Weighted average exercise pricecommon stock pursuant to a Standby Purchase Agreement between BARC Investments, LLC and the Company dated February 28, 2024. Ms. Alessandra F. Bianco and Mr. Richard A. Bianco, Jr., are managing members of outstanding optionsShares available for future issuance
Equity Compensation - plans approvedBARC Investments, LLC, and share voting and dispositive power with respect to shares held by stockholders-$-4,320,000
BARC Investments, LLC.  Ms. Bianco and Mr. Richard A. Bianco, Jr. are the adult children of Mr. Richard A. Bianco, the Company’s Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer.  The business address of the reporting persons under this Schedule 13D/A is c/o Barry Strauss & Associates, 307 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10016. Pursuant to Rule 13d-4, each of Ms. Bianco and Mr. Richard A. Bianco, Jr. disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares beneficially owned by BARC Investments to the extent he or she does not have a pecuniary interest in such shares.


(b)Ownership amount is reported on a Schedule 13DA-6, filed by Camac Partners, LLC (“Camac Partners”) on March 11, 2024, dated March 13, 2024; Camac Partners is the general partner of Camac Fund, LP (the “Fund”).  Camac Capital, LLC is the investment manager of the Fund.  Eric Shahinian (“Mr. Shahinian”) is the managing member of Camac Partners. Camac Partners, Camac Capital, Camac Fund and Eric Shahinian may each be deemed to have voting and dispositive power with respect to the shares of the Company’s common stock held by the Fund.  The business address of the reporting persons under this Schedule 13D is 350 Park Avenue, 13th Floor, New York, NY 10022.

Plan not approved
49

Stock Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers

According to information furnished by stockholders

None.

For other information required to beeach nominee, continuing director and executive officer included in the Summary Compensation Table, the number of shares of the Company’s Common Stock beneficially owned by them, as of March 15, 2024, except as set forth by the Company in response to this item, see the Company's definitive Proxy Statement for its Annual Meetingbelow.

 
 
Name of Beneficial Owner
 
Amount and
Nature of
Beneficial
Ownership (a) (b)
   
Percentage of
Common Stock
Owned
 
        
Richard A. Bianco
  
1,622,547
 (c)  
4.0
%
Joseph R. Bianco
  
50,000
    
*
 
John Ferrara
  
36,029
    
*
 
Alessandra F. Bianco
  
60,400,260
 (d)  
70.9
%
Richard A. Bianco, Jr.
  
60,400,260
 (d)  
70.9
%
Jerry Y. Carnegie
  
71,898
    
*
 
Scott M. Salant
  
-
    
-
 
All Directors and Officers as a group (7 persons)
  
17,780,474
    
43.6
%

* Represents less than 1% of Shareholders to be held on June 7, 2018, under the caption "Stock Ownership", which is incorporated herein by reference, which the Company intends to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission not later than 120 days after the end of its 2017 fiscal year.Common Stock outstanding


(a)All of the named individuals have sole voting and investment power with respect to such shares.

(b)There are no pledges of Company shares by any of the Company’s officers, employees or directors.

(c)Includes 1,420,000 shares held in a Uniform Gifts to Minors Act Account for the benefit of his grandchildren.  Mr. R.A. Bianco retains voting control of the shares, but pursuant to Rule 13d-4, he disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares to the extent he does not have a pecuniary interest in such shares.

(d)
Ownership amount reported is based on a Schedule 13D/A filed by BARC Investments, LLC on March 8, 2024, and assumes that in the absence of any subsequent amendments to such Schedule 13D/A that the amounts reported therein have not changed.  Includes the right to acquire up to 44,200,460 shares of common stock pursuant to a Standby Purchase Agreement between BARC Investments, LLC and the Company dated February 28, 2024. Ms. Alessandra F. Bianco and Mr. Richard A. Bianco, Jr. are managing members of BARC Investments, LLC and share voting and dispositive power with respect to shares held by BARC Investments, LLC. Ms. Bianco and Mr. Richard A. Bianco, Jr. are the adult children of Mr. Richard A. Bianco, the Company’s Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer. Pursuant to Rule 13d-4, each of Ms. Bianco and Mr. Richard A. Bianco, Jr. disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares beneficially owned by BARC Investments to the extent he or she does not have a pecuniary interest in such shares.

ITEM 13.CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE


Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions
For
Pursuant to the informationCompany’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (“Code of Conduct”), all employees (including our Named Executive Officers, as defined below) who have, or whose immediate family members have, any direct or indirect financial or other participation in any business that competes with, supplies goods or services to, or is a customer of the Company or its subsidiaries, are required to disclose to us and receive written approval prior to transacting such business.  Except for the Participation Interest and the Litigation Funding Agreement discussed below, no such relationships have been reported. Our employees are expected to make reasoned and impartial decisions in the workplace.  As a result, approval of a business relationship would be set forthdenied if it is believed that the employee’s interest in such a relationship could influence decisions relative to the Company’s business or have the potential to adversely affect the Company’s business or the objective performance of the employee’s work. In addition, the Company’s Code of Conduct requires adherence to a number of other underlying principles which are important to the Company.  These items include, but are not limited to, restrictions on disclosure of Company information, insider trading, and the protection and use of Company assets.

The Board of Directors assesses all transactions between the Company and “related persons” as such term is defined in Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K.  If a transaction is deemed to be a related party transaction that transaction would be reviewed by the Company in response to this item, seeCompany’s Board of Directors and approved by the Company's definitive Proxy Statement for its Annual Meetingdisinterested members of Shareholders to be held on June 7, 2018, under the captions "Proposal No. 1 - Election of Directors" and "Information Concerning the Board and its Committees," which are incorporated herein by reference, which the Company intends to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission not later than 120 days after the end of its 2017 fiscal year.Directors.


ITEM 14.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES


The information concerning Principal Accounting Fees and Services is set forth by the Company under the heading "Proposal 2 - Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm", "Independent Registered Public Accountant Matters,"Firm

The Audit Committee appointed Marcum LLP (“Marcum”) as the Company’s principal accountants and independent registered public accounting firm, to audit the consolidated financial statements of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2023.  A representative of Marcum will be present at the meeting and will have the opportunity to make a statement if such representative desires to do so and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.

Audit Fees

Aggregate fees billed by Marcum for professional services rendered for the audit of our annual consolidated financial statements included in the Company's definitive Proxy StatementAnnual Report on Form 10-K, the review of interim consolidated financial statements included in Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and the review and audit of the application of new accounting pronouncements and SEC releases were approximately $72,000 for its Annual Meetingthe year ended December 31, 2023 and approximately $69,000 for the year ended December 31, 2022.

Audit Related Fees

No audit related fees were paid to either Marcum for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of Shareholdersthe audit or review of our financial statements and that are not disclosed under “Audit Fees” for the years ended December 31, 2023, and 2022.

Tax Fees and All Other Fees

No other fees relating to be held on June 7, 2018, which is incorporated herein by reference, whichtax advisory or other services were paid to Marcum for professional services rendered to the Company intendsfor the years ended December 31, 2023, and 2022.

Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy

Pursuant to fileits charter, the Audit Committee is responsible for selecting, approving compensation and overseeing the independence, qualifications and performance of the Company’s independent accountants.  The Audit Committee has adopted a pre-approval policy pursuant to which certain permissible audit and non-audit services may be provided by the independent accountants.  Pre-approval is generally provided for up to one year, is detailed as to the particular service or category of services and may be subject to a specific budget.  The Audit Committee may also pre-approve particular services on a case-by-case basis.  In assessing requests for services by the Company’s independent accountants, the Audit Committee considers whether such services are consistent with the Securitiesauditor’s independence; whether the Company’s independent accountants are likely to provide the most effective and Exchange Commission not later than 120 days afterefficient service based upon their familiarity with the endCompany; and whether the service could enhance our ability to manage or control risk or improve audit quality.

There were no non-audit related tax or other services provided by Marcum in fiscal years 2023 and 2022.

51



PART IV



PART IV
ITEM 15.EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a)  Documents filed as a part of this report:
 
1.  Index to Financial Statements:Page
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (PCAOB ID 688)1614
Consolidated Statements of Operations1715
Consolidated Balance Sheets1816
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders'Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)1917
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows2018
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements2119

2.  Index to Financial Statements Schedules:
(b)  Exhibits:
 Schedule III - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
(b)  Exhibits:
3.1*
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of AmBase Corporation (as amended and restated – July 15, 2017), (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017).
 3.2*
By-Laws of AmBase Corporation (as amended through March 15, 1996), (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017).
 4*
Amended & Restated Rights Agreement dated as of February 10, 1986March 27, 2019, between the Company and American Stock Transfer and Trust Co. as amended through November 10, 2015.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018).
 10.4
Description of Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019).
Employment Agreement dated as of March 30, 2006, between Richard A. Bianco and the Company, (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10H to the Company'sCompany’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005).
 10.5
Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of January 1, 2008, between Richard A. Bianco and the Company, (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10E to the Company'sCompany’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007)
.
 10.6*
Amendment to Employment Agreement between Richard A. Bianco and the Company extending term of employment to May 31, 2023.
2023, (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017).
 10.7
Amendment to Employment Agreement between Richard A. Bianco and the Company extending term of employment to May 31, 2028, (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 Company’s Current report on Form 8-K filed January 20, 2023).
111 West 57th Partners LLC Limited Liability Company Agreement.  Dated as of June 28, 2013, (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Amendment no. 1 to the Company'sCompany’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2013).
 10.8
Second Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of 111 West 57th Investment, LLC dated December 19, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Company'sCompany’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014).
 10.9
Agreement between Mr. Richard A. Bianco, the Company'sCompany’s Chairman President and Chief Executive Officer ("R. A. Bianco"(“Mr. R.A. Bianco”) and the Company for Mr. R. A.R.A. Bianco to provide to the Company a financial commitment in the form of a line of credit up to ten million dollars ($10,000,000) or additional amount(s) as may be necessary and agreed to enable AmBase to contribute capital to the 111 West 57th Property (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Company'sCompany’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the annual period ending December 31, 2016).
 10.10
Amendment dated May 20, 2019, to the September 2017 Litigation Funding Agreement, dated September 2017, between Mr. R.A. Bianco and the Company, (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current report on Form 8-K filed May 21, 2019).

Senior Promissory Note between Richard A. Bianco, the Company's Chairman,Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer ("(“Mr. R. A. Bianco"R.A. Bianco”) and the Company, (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company'sCompany’s Current report on Form 8-K dated September 26, 2017filed February 9, 2023).
Senior Promissory Note for $325,000, between Richard A. Bianco, the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer (“Mr. R.A. Bianco”) and the Company (filed as Exhibit 10.310.1 to the Company's QuarterlyCompany’s Current Report on Form 10-Q for8-K as filed with the quarterly period ending September 30, 2017)SEC on April 10, 2023, and incorporated herein by reference).
 10.11*
Contract for sale of real estate owned dated January 17, 2018, between the Company's wholly-owned subsidiary, Maiden Lane Associates, Ltd. and Maria USA, filed herewith.
 14Senior Promissory Note for $310,000, between Richard A. Bianco, the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer (“Mr. R.A. Bianco”) and the Company (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on May 11, 2023, and incorporated herein by reference).
Senior Promissory Note for $330,000, between Richard A. Bianco, the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer (“Mr. R.A. Bianco”) and the Company (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on June 26, 2023, and incorporated herein by reference).
Senior Promissory Note for $333,000, between Richard A. Bianco, the Company’s President, and Chief Executive Officer (“Mr. R.A. Bianco”) and the Company (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on July 20, 2023, and incorporated herein by reference).
Senior Promissory Note for $250,000, between Richard A. Bianco, the Company’s President, and Chief Executive Officer (“Mr. R.A. Bianco”) and the Company (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on August 15, 2023, and incorporated herein by reference).
Senior Promissory Note for $300,000, between Richard A. Bianco, the Company’s President, and Chief Executive Officer (“Mr. R.A. Bianco”) and the Company (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on October 10, 2023, and incorporated herein by reference).
Senior Promissory Note for $450,000, between Richard A. Bianco, the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer (“Mr. R.A. Bianco”) and the Company (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on November 28, 2023, and incorporated herein by reference).
Senior Promissory Note for $600,000, between Richard A. Bianco, the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer (“Mr. R.A. Bianco”) and the Company (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on December 28, 2023, and incorporated herein by reference).
Senior Promissory Note for $100,000, between Richard A. Bianco, the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer (“Mr. R.A. Bianco”) and the Company (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on January 26, 2024, and incorporated herein by reference).
Senior Promissory Note for $50,000, between Richard A. Bianco, the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer (“Mr. R.A. Bianco”) and the Company (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on February 8, 2024, and incorporated herein by reference).
Senior Promissory Note for $100,000, between Richard A. Bianco, the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer (“Mr. R.A. Bianco”) and the Company (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on February 27, 2024, and incorporated herein by reference).

Senior Promissory Note for $100,000, between Richard A. Bianco, the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer (“Mr. R.A. Bianco”) and the Company (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on March 11, 2024, and incorporated herein by reference).
Form of Subscription Agreement filed herewith.
Standby Purchase Agreement dated February 28, 2024, between BARC Investments LLC and the Company, filed herewith.
August 31, 2012, Supervisory Goodwill Settlement Agreement (originally filed as Exhibit 99 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 22, 2012, and incorporated by reference herein).

AmBase Corporation - Code of Ethics as adopted by Board of Directors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 14 to the Company'sCompany’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003).

AmBase Corporation Insider Trading Policies and Procedures (included in the AmBase Corporation – Code of Ethics filed as Exhibit 14 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K).
 
Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
 
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14.
 
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14.
 
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
 
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
 99.1
August 31, 2012, Supervisory Goodwill Settlement Agreement (originally filed as Exhibit 99 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 22, 2012 and incorporated by reference herein).
 
101.1*
The following financial statements from AmBase Corporation'sCorporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20172023, formatted in XBRL: (i) Consolidated Statement of Operations; (ii) Consolidated Balance Sheets; (iii) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow: and (iv) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


Exhibits, except as otherwise indicated above, are filed herewith.
* filed herewith.


ITEM 16. 
ITEM 16.FORM 10-K SUMMARY


Not applicable.


Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
AMBASE CORPORATION
  
   
/s/RICHARD A. BIANCO
Chairman, President and Chief Executive
Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
Date:  March 30, 201818, 2024
  
   
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities on the dates indicated.
   
/s/RICHARD A. BIANCO
Chairman, President,
Chief Executive Officer and Director
Date:  March 30, 201818, 2024
 
/s/JOHN FERRARA
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
and Controller
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Date:  March 30, 201818, 2024
   
/s/ALESSANDRA F. BIANCO
Director
Date:  March 30, 201818, 2024
 
/s/RICHARD A. BIANCO, JR.
Director
Date:  March 30, 201818, 2024
   
/s/JERRY Y. CARNEGIE
Director
Date:  March 30, 201818, 2024
 
/s/KENNETHSCOTT M. SCHMIDTSALANT, ESQ.
Director
Date:  March 30, 201818, 2024


AMBASE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE III. REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION55
December 31, 2017
(dollars in thousands)



 
COLUMN A
 
COLUMN B
  
COLUMN C
  
COLUMN D
  
COLUMN E
    
     
Initial Cost
to Company
  
Cost Capitalized Subsequent to
Acquisition
  
Gross Amount at which Carried
at Close of Period
    
Description Encumbrances  Land  Building & Improvements  Improvements  Land  Building & Improvements  Total 
Office Building:                     
Greenwich, CT $-  $554  $1,880  $20  $554  $1,900  $2,454 
                             
Total $-  $554  $1,880  $20  $554  $1,900  $2,454 

[Additional columns below]
[Continued from above table, first column(s) repeated]

 
COLUMN A
 
COLUMN F
  
COLUMN G
 
 
COLUMN H
 
COLUMN I
Description Accumulated Depreciation  
Date of
Construction
 
Date
Acquired
Life on Which Depreciation in Latest Income Statement is Computed
Office Building:            
Greenwich, CT $774   1970 April 200139 years
                
Total $774         
                
[a] Reconciliation of total real estate carrying value is as follows:

  Year Ended December 31, 2017  Year Ended December 31, 2016 
       
Balance at beginning of year $2,454  $2,454 
Improvements  -   - 
Acquisitions  -   - 
Disposition  -   - 
Balance at end of year $2,454  $2,454 
         
Total cost for federal tax purposes at end of each year $2,454  $2,454 
         

[b] Reconciliation of accumulated depreciation as follows:

Balance at beginning of year $774  $726 
Depreciation expense  48   48 
Dispositions  -   - 
Balance at end of year $822  $774 

DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS
Board of Directors
Richard A. Bianco
Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer
AmBase Corporation
Alessandra F. Bianco
Senior Officer
BARC Investments, LLC
Richard A. Bianco, Jr.
Employee AmBase Corporation  & Officer
BARC Investments, LLC
Jerry Y. Carnegie
Private Investor
Kenneth M. Schmidt
Private Investor
AmBase Officers
Richard A. Bianco
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
John Ferrara
Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and Controller
Joseph R. Bianco
Treasurer


Annual Meeting of Stockholders
The 2018 Annual Meeting is currently scheduled to be held at 9:00 a.m. Eastern Time, on Thursday, June 7, 2018, at:
Hyatt Regency Hotel
1800 East Putnam Avenue
Greenwich, CT  06870
Corporate Headquarters
AmBase Corporation
One South Ocean Boulevard, Suite 301
Boca Raton, FL  33432
(201) 265-0169
Common Stock Trading
AmBase stock is traded through one or more market-makers with quotations made available on the over-the-counter market.
Issue:  Common Stock
Abbreviation:  AmBase
Ticker Symbol:  ABCP.OB
Transfer Agent and Registrar
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC
6201 15th Avenue
Brooklyn, NY 11219
Attention: Shareholder Services
(800) 937-5449 or (718) 921-8200 Ext. 6820
Stockholder Inquiries
Stockholder inquiries, including requests for the following: (i) change of address; (ii) replacement of lost stock certificates; (iii) Common Stock name registration changes; (iv) Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q; (v) Annual Reports on Form 10-K; (vi) proxy material; and (vii) information regarding stockholdings, should be directed to:
American Stock Transfer & Trust Co. LLC
6201 15th Ave.
Brooklyn, NY 11219
Attention: Shareholder Services
(800) 937-5449 or (718) 921-8200 Ext. 6820
In addition, the Company's public reports, including Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Annual Reports on Form 10-K and Proxy Statements, can be obtained through the Securities and Exchange Commission EDGAR Database over the World Wide Web at www.sec.gov.
Independent Registered Public Accountants
Marcum LLP
Maritime Center
555 Long Wharf Drive
New Haven, CT  06511
Number of Stockholders
As of February 28, 2018, there were,
approximately 8,200 stockholders.