UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)
ýANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20182021
OR
oTRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to

Commission File Number 001-02217
cocacola24.jpgko-20211231_g1.jpg
COCA COLA CO
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
58-0628465
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)incorporation)
58-0628465
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
One Coca-Cola Plaza
Atlanta,Georgia
30313
(Address of principal executive offices)
30313
(Zip Code)
Registrant'sRegistrant’s telephone number, including area code: (404) 676-2121

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each classTrading Symbol(s)Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, $0.25 Par ValueKONew York Stock Exchange
Floating Rate0.500% Notes Due 20192024KO24New York Stock Exchange
Floating Rate1.875% Notes Due 20192026KO26New York Stock Exchange
0.000%0.750% Notes Due 20212026KO26CNew York Stock Exchange
1.125% Notes Due 20222027KO27New York Stock Exchange
0.75%0.125% Notes Due 20232029KO29ANew York Stock Exchange
0.500%0.125% Notes Due 20242029KO29BNew York Stock Exchange
1.875%0.400% Notes Due 20262030KO30BNew York Stock Exchange
1.125%1.250% Notes Due 20272031KO31New York Stock Exchange
0.375% Notes Due 2033KO33New York Stock Exchange
0.500% Notes Due 2033KO33ANew York Stock Exchange
1.625% Notes Due 2035KO35New York Stock Exchange
1.100% Notes Due 2036KO36New York Stock Exchange
0.950% Notes Due 2036KO36ANew York Stock Exchange
0.800% Notes Due 2040KO40BNew York Stock Exchange
1.000% Notes Due 2041KO41New York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None




Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ý    No o
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes o   No ý
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý    No o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ý    No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10‑K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of "large“large accelerated filer," "accelerated” “accelerated filer," "smaller” “smaller reporting company"company” and "emerging“emerging growth company"company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filerý
 Accelerated filero
Non-accelerated filero

Smaller reporting companyo
Emerging growth companyo
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the Registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the Registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o   No ý
The aggregate market value of the common equity held by non-affiliates of the Registrant (assuming for these purposes, but without conceding, that all executive officers and Directors are "affiliates"“affiliates” of the Registrant) as of June 29, 2018,July 2, 2021, the last business day of the Registrant'sRegistrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was $184,986,760,847$232,023,179,143 (based on the closing sale price of the Registrant'sRegistrant’s Common Stock on that date as reported on the New York Stock Exchange).
The number of shares outstanding of the Registrant'sRegistrant’s Common Stock as of February 15, 2019,18, 2022 was 4,275,340,031.4,335,473,308.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Company'sCompany’s Proxy Statement for the 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareowners to be held on April 24, 2019, are incorporated by reference in Part III.




THE COCA-COLA COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
Table of Contents

Page
Part I
Part II
Part III
Part IV

1




FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This report contains information that may constitute "forward-looking“forward-looking statements." Generally, the words "believe," "expect," "intend," "estimate," "anticipate," "project," "will"“believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “project,” “will” and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements, which generally are not historical in nature. However, the absence of these words or similar expressions does not mean that a statement is not forward-looking. All statements that address operating performance, events or developments that we expect or anticipate will occur in the future — including statements relating to volume growth, share of sales and earnings per share growth, and statements expressing general views about future operating results — are forward-looking statements. Management believes that these forward-looking statements are reasonable as and when made. However, caution should be taken not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements because such statements speak only as of the date when made. Our Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law. In addition, forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause our Company'sCompany’s actual results to differ materially from historical experience and our present expectations or projections. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the possibility that the assumptions used to calculate our estimated aggregate incremental tax and interest liability related to the potential unfavorable outcome of the ongoing tax dispute with the United States Internal Revenue Service could significantly change; those described in Part I, "Item“Item 1A. Risk Factors"Factors” and elsewhere in this reportreport; and those described from time to time in our future reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

PARTPart I
ITEM 1.  BUSINESS
In this report, the terms "The“The Coca-Cola Company," "Company," "we," "us"” “Company,” “we,” “us” and "our"“our” mean The Coca-Cola Company and all entities included in our consolidated financial statements.
General
The Coca-Cola Company is the world's largest nonalcoholica total beverage company. We own or licensecompany, and market more than 500 nonalcoholic beverage brands, which we group into the following category clusters: sparkling soft drinks; water, enhanced water and sports drinks; juice, dairy and plant-based beverages; tea and coffee; and energy drinks. We own and market four of the world's top five nonalcoholic sparkling soft drink brands: Coca-Cola, Diet Coke, Fanta and Sprite. Finished beverage products bearing our trademarks, sold in the United States since 1886, are now sold in more than 200 countries and territories. We own or license and market numerous beverage brands, which we group into the following categories: Trademark Coca-Cola; sparkling flavors; hydration, sports, coffee and tea; nutrition, juice, dairy and plant-based beverages; and emerging beverages. We own and market five of the world’s top six nonalcoholic sparkling soft drink brands: Coca-Cola, Sprite, Fanta, Diet Coke and Coca-Cola Zero Sugar.
We make our branded beverage products available to consumers throughout the world through our network of independent bottling partners, distributors, wholesalers and retailers as well as Company-owned or -controlledour consolidated bottling and distribution operations — the world's largest beverage distribution system.operations. Beverages bearing trademarks owned by or licensed to usthe Company account for more than 1.92.1 billion of the approximately 6163 billion servings of all beverages consumed worldwide every day.
We believe our success depends on our ability to connect with consumers by providing them with a wide variety of beverage options to meet their desires, needs and lifestyles. Our success further depends on the ability of our people to execute effectively, every day.
Our objectiveWe are guided by our purpose, which is to refresh the world and make a difference, and rooted in our strategy to drive net operating revenue growth and generate long-term value. Our vision for growth has three connected pillars:
Loved Brands. We craft meaningful brands and a choice of drinks that people love and that refresh them in body and spirit.
Done Sustainably. We use our Company's assets — our brands, financial strength, unrivaled distribution system, global reach, andleadership to be part of the talent and strong commitment of our management and associates —solution to become more competitiveachieve positive change in the world and to acceleratebuild a more sustainable future for our planet.
For A Better Shared Future. We invest to improve people’s lives, from our employees to all those who touch our business system, to our investors, to the broad communities we call home.
Effective January 1, 2021, we transformed our organizational structure in an effort to better enable us to capture growth in the fast-changing marketplace by building a manner that creates value for our shareowners.networked global organization designed to combine the power of scale with the deep knowledge required to win locally. We created new operating units, which are focused on regional and local execution. The operating units, which sit under four geographic operating segments, as discussed below, are highly interconnected, with more consistency in their structure and a focus on eliminating duplication of resources and scaling new products more quickly. The operating units work closely with five global marketing category leadership teams to rapidly scale ideas while staying close to the consumer. The global marketing category leadership teams primarily focus on innovation as well as marketing efficiency and effectiveness. Our organizational structure also includes a center and a platform services organization, as discussed below.
We were
2


The Coca-Cola Company was incorporated in September 1919 under the laws of the State of Delaware and succeeded to the business of a Georgia corporation with the same name that had been organized in 1892.
Operating Segments
The Company'sCompany’s operating structure is the basis for our internal financial reporting. As of December 31, 2018, ourOur operating structure includedincludes the following operating segments, which are sometimes referred to as "operating groups" or "groups":segments:
Europe, Middle East and Africa
Latin America
North America
Asia Pacific
Global Ventures
Bottling Investments
Our operating structure as of December 31, 2018 also includedincludes Corporate, which consists of two components: (1) a center focusedfocusing on strategic initiatives, policy, and governance and scaling global initiatives; and (2) an enablinga platform services organization focused on both simplifying and standardizing key transactional processes and providing support to businesssupporting the operating units, through global centers of excellence.
In January 2019, we established a new operating segment, Global Ventures, which includes the results of Costa Limited ("Costa"), which we acquired on January 3, 2019,marketing category leadership teams and the results ofcenter by providing efficient and scaled global services and capabilities including, but not limited to, transactional work, data management, consumer analytics, digital commerce and social/digital hubs.
For additional information about our innocentoperating segments and Doğadan businesses as well as fees earned pursuant to distribution coordination agreements between the Company and Monster Beverage Corporation ("Monster"). ReferCorporate, refer to Note 2219 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements set forth in Part II, "Item“Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data"Data” of this report for information regarding the Costa acquisition.report.
Except to the extent that differences among operating segments are material to an understanding of our business taken as a whole, the description of our business in this report is presented on a consolidated basis.
Products and Brands
As used in this report:
"concentrates"“concentrates” means flavoringflavorings and other ingredients which, when combined with water and, depending on the product, sweeteners (nutritive or non-nutritive) are used to prepare syrups or finished beverages, and includes powders or powders/minerals for purified water products;
"syrups"“syrups” means intermediate products in the beverage ingredientsmanufacturing process produced by combining concentrates with water and, depending on the product, sweeteners and added water;(nutritive or non-nutritive);

"fountain syrups"syrups” means syrups that are sold to fountain retailers, such as restaurants and convenience stores, which use dispensing equipment to mix the syrups with sparkling or still water at the time of purchase to produce finished beverages that are served in cups or glasses for immediate consumption;
"Company Trademark Beverages"Beverages” means beverages bearing our trademarks and certain other beverage productsbeverages bearing trademarks licensed to us by third parties for which we provide marketing support and from the sale of which we derive an economic benefit; and
"Trademark Coca-Cola Beverages"Beverages” or "Trademark Coca-Cola"“Trademark Coca-Cola” means beverages bearing the trademark Coca-Cola or any trademark that includes Coca-Cola or Coke (that is, Coca-Cola, Coca-Cola Life, Diet Coke/Coca-Cola Light and Coca-Cola Zero Sugar and all their variations and any line extensions, including caffeine free Diet Coke, Cherry Coke, etc.). Likewise, when we use the capitalized word "Trademark"“Trademark” together with the name of one of our other beverage products (such as "Trademark“Trademark Fanta," "Trademark Sprite"” “Trademark Sprite” or "Trademark Simply"“Trademark Simply”), we mean beverages bearing the indicated trademark (that is, Fanta, Sprite or Simply, respectively) and all its variations and line extensions (such that "Trademark Fanta"“Trademark Fanta” includes Fanta Orange, Fanta Zero Orange, Fanta Zero Sugar, Fanta Apple, etc.; "Trademark Sprite"“Trademark Sprite” includes Sprite, Diet Sprite, Sprite Zero Sprite Light,Sugar, etc.; and "Trademark Simply"“Trademark Simply” includes Simply Orange, Simply Apple, Simply Grapefruit, etc.).
Our Company markets, manufactures and sells:
beverage concentrates, sometimes referred to as "beverage“beverage bases," and syrups, including fountain syrups (we refer to this part of our business as our "concentrate business" or "concentrate operations"“concentrate operations”); and
finished sparkling soft drinks and other nonalcoholic beverages (we refer to this part of our business as our "finished“finished product business" or "finished product operations"operations”).
Generally, finished product operations generate higher net operating revenues but lower gross profit margins than concentrate operations.
In our domestic and international
3


Our concentrate operations we typically generate net operating revenues by selling concentrates, syrups and certain finished beverages to authorized bottling operations (to which we typically refer as our "bottlers"“bottlers” or our "bottling partners"“bottling partners”). Our bottling partners either combine the concentrates with still or sparkling water and sweeteners (depending on the product), still water and/or sparkling water, or combine the syrups with still or sparkling water, to produce finished beverages. The finished beverages are packaged in authorized containers, such as cans and refillable and nonrefillable glass and plastic bottles, bearing our trademarks or trademarks licensed to us and are then sold to retailers directly or, in some cases, through wholesalers or other bottlers. In addition, outside the United States, our bottling partners are typically authorized to manufacture fountain syrups, using our concentrate,concentrates, which they sell to fountain retailers for use in producing beverages for immediate consumption, or to authorized fountain wholesalers who in turn sell and distribute the fountain syrups to fountain retailers. Our concentrate operations are included in our geographic operating segments.segments and our Global Ventures operating segment.
Our finished product operations generate net operating revenues by selling sparkling soft drinks and a variety of other finished nonalcoholic beverages such as water, enhanced water and sports drinks; juice, dairy and plant-based beverages; tea and coffee; and energy drinks, to retailers or to distributors and wholesalers who distribute themin turn sell the beverages to retailers. These operations consist primarily of Company-owned or -controlledour consolidated bottling sales and distribution operations, which are included in our Bottling Investments operating segment. In certain markets, the Company also operates non-bottling finished product operations in which we sell finished beverages to distributors and wholesalers that are generally not one of the Company'sCompany’s bottling partners. These operations are generally included in one of our geographic operating segments.segments or our Global Ventures operating segment. Additionally, we sell directly to consumers through retail stores operated by Costa Limited (“Costa”). These sales are included in our Global Ventures operating segment. In the United States, we manufacture fountain syrups and sell them to fountain retailers, who use the fountain syrups to produce beverages for immediate consumption, or to authorized fountain wholesalers or bottling partners who resellin turn sell the fountain syrups to fountain retailers. These fountain syrup sales are included in our North America operating segment.
For information regarding net operating revenues and unit case volume related to our concentrate operations and finished product operations, refer to the heading "Our“Our Business — General"General” set forth in Part II, "Item“Item 7. Management'sManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations"Operations” of this report, which is incorporated herein by reference.report.
For information regarding how we measure the volume of Company beverage products sold by the Company and our bottling partners ("(“Coca-Cola system"system”), refer to the heading "Operations“Operations Review — Beverage Volume"Volume” set forth in Part II, "Item“Item 7. Management'sManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations"Operations” of this report, which is incorporated herein by reference.




report.
We own and market numerous valuable nonalcoholic beverage brands, including the following:
sparkling soft drinks: Coca-Cola, Diet Coke/Coca-Cola Light, Coca-Cola Zero Sugar, Fanta, Schweppes,*
sparkling soft drinks: Coca-Cola, Diet Coke/Coca-Cola Light, Coca-Cola Zero Sugar, Fanta, Fresca, Schweppes,1 Sprite Thums Up;
water, enhanced water and Thums Up;
hydration, sports, drinks:coffee and tea: Aquarius, Ayataka, BODYARMOR, Ciel, Costa, doğadan, Dasani, FUZE TEA, Georgia, glacéau smartwater, glacéau vitaminwater, Gold Peak, Ice Dew, I LOHAS, Powerade;
Powerade and Topo Chico; and
nutrition, juice, dairy and plant-based beverages:beverages: AdeS, Del Valle, fairlife, innocent, Minute Maid, Minute Maid Pulpy Simply, ZICO; and
Simply.
tea and coffee: Ayataka, Costa, FUZE TEA, Georgia, Gold Peak, HONEST TEA.
*1Schweppes is owned by the Company in certain countries other than the United States.
In addition to the beverage brands we own, we also provide marketing support and otherwise participate in the sales of other nonalcoholic beverage brands through licenses, joint ventures and strategic partnerships, including, but not limited to, the following:
Certainpartnerships. For example, certain Coca-Cola system bottlers distribute certain brands of Monster Beverage Corporation (“Monster”), primarily Monster Energy, in designated territories in the United States, Canada and other international territories pursuant to distribution coordination agreements between the Company and Monster and related distribution agreements between Monster and Coca-Cola system bottlers.
We have a strategic partnership with Aujan Industries Company J.S.C. ("Aujan"), one of the largest independent beverage companies in the Middle East. We own 50 percent of the entity that holds the rights in certain territories to brands produced and distributed by Aujan, including Rani, a juice brand, and Barbican, a flavored malt beverage brand.
We and certain of our bottling partners distribute products of fairlife, LLC ("fairlife"), our joint venture with Select Milk Producers, Inc., a dairy cooperative, including fairlife ultra-filtered milk and Core Power, a high-protein milk shake, in the United States and Canada.

Consumer demand determines the optimal menu of Company product offerings. Consumer demand can vary from one market to another and can change over time within a single market. Employing our business strategy, ourOur Company continually seeks to further build its existing brands and, at the same time, to broadenoptimize its portfolio of brands, products and services in order to create and satisfy consumer demand in every market.
Distribution System
We make our branded beverage products available to consumers in more than 200 countries and territories through our network of independent bottling partners, distributors, wholesalers and retailers as well as Company-owned or -controlledour consolidated bottling and distribution operations — the world's largest beverage distribution system.operations. Consumers enjoy finished beverage products bearing trademarks owned by or licensed to usthe Company at a rate of more than 1.92.1 billion servings each day. We continue to expand our marketing presence in an effort to increase our unit case volume and net operating revenues in developed, developing and emerging markets. Our strong and stable bottling and distribution system helps us to capture growth by manufacturing, distributing and selling existing, enhanced and new innovative products to our consumers throughout the world.
The Coca-Cola system sold 29.6 billion, 29.231.3 billion and 29.329.0 billion unit cases of our products in 2018, 20172021 and 2016,2020, respectively. Sparkling soft drinks represented 69 percent of our worldwide unit case volume for each of 2018, 2017in both 2021 and 2016.2020. Trademark Coca-Cola accounted for 4547 percent of our worldwide unit case volume for each of 2018, 2017in both 2021 and 2016.
2020. In 2018,2021, unit case volume in the United States
4


represented 1817 percent of the Company'sCompany’s worldwide unit case volume. Of the U.S. unit case volume, 6261 percent was attributable to sparkling soft drinks. Trademark Coca-Cola accounted for 4342 percent of U.S. unit case volume.
Unit case volume outside the United States represented 8283 percent of the Company'sCompany’s worldwide unit case volume for 2018.in 2021. The countries outside the United States in which our unit case volumes were the largest were Mexico, China, Brazil and Japan,India, which together accounted for 31 percent of our worldwide unit case volume. Of the non-U.S. unit case volume, 7071 percent was attributable to sparkling soft drinks. Trademark Coca-Cola accounted for 4648 percent of non-U.S. unit case volume.
Our five largest independent bottling partners based on unit case volume in 2018 were:2021 were as follows:
Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. ("(“Coca-Cola FEMSA"FEMSA”), which has bottling and distribution operations inMexico (a substantial part of central Mexico, including Mexico City, as well as southeast and northeast Mexico), Guatemala (nationwide), Nicaragua (nationwide), Costa Rica (nationwide), Panama (nationwide), Colombia (most of the country), Venezuela (nationwide), Brazil (greater(a major part of the states of São Paulo Campiñas, Santos,and Minas Gerais, the state of Mato Grosso do Sul, the

state of Paraná, the state of Santa Catarina, part of the state of Rio Grande do Sul, part of the state of Goiás and part of the state of Rio de Janeiro and part of the state of Minas Gerais)Janeiro), Argentina (federal capital of Buenos Aires and surrounding areas) and Uruguay (nationwide);
Coca-Cola EuropeanEuropacific Partners plc ("CCEP"(“CCEP”), which has bottling and distribution operations in Andorra, Australia, Belgium, Fiji, continental France, Germany, Great Britain, Iceland, Indonesia, Luxembourg, Monaco, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Papua New Guinea, Portugal, Samoa, Spain and Sweden;
Coca-Cola HBC AG ("(“Coca-Cola Hellenic"Hellenic”), which has bottling and distribution operations in Armenia, Austria, Belarus, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Estonia, the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Moldova, Montenegro, Nigeria, North Macedonia, Northern Ireland, Poland, Republic of Ireland, Romania, the Russian Federation, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Switzerland and Ukraine;
Arca Continental, S.A.B. de C.V., which has bottling and distribution operations in northern and western Mexico, northern Argentina, Ecuador, Peru, and the state of Texas and parts of the states of New Mexico, Oklahoma and Arkansas in the United States; and
Swire Beverages, which has bottling and distribution operations in 11 provinces and the Shanghai Municipality in the eastern and southern areas of mainland China, Hong Kong, Taiwan and territories in 13 states in the western United States.
In 2018,2021, these five bottling partners combined represented 4041 percent of our total worldwide unit case volume.
Being a bottler does not create a legal partnership or joint venture between us and our bottlers. Our bottlers are independent contractors and are not our agents.
Bottler'sBottler’s Agreements
We have separate contracts, to which we generally refer as "bottler's“bottler’s agreements," with our bottling partners regarding the manufacture and sale of Company products.under which our bottling partners are granted certain authorizations by us. Subject to specified terms and conditions and certain variations, the bottler'sbottler’s agreements generally authorize the bottlers to prepare, package, distribute and sell Company Trademark Beverages in authorized containers in (but, subject to applicable local law, generally only in) an identified territory. The bottler is obligated to purchase its entire requirement of concentrates or syrups for the designated Company Trademark Beverages from the Company or Company-authorized suppliers. We typically agree to refrain from selling or distributing, or from authorizing third parties to sell or distribute, the designated Company Trademark Beverages throughout the identified territory in the particular authorized containers; however,containers. However, we typically reserve for ourselves or our designee the right (1) to prepare and package such Company Trademark Beverages in such containers in the territory for sale outside the territory; (2) to prepare, package, distribute and sell such Company Trademark Beverages in the territory in any other manner or form (territorial restrictions on bottlers vary in some cases in accordance with local law); and (3) to handle certain key accounts (accounts that cover multiple territories).
While under most of our bottler'sbottler’s agreements we generally have complete flexibility to determine the price and other terms of sale of the concentrates and syrups we sell to our bottlers, as a practical matter, our Company'sCompany’s ability to exercise its contractual flexibility to determine the price and other terms of sale of concentrates and syrups is subject, both outside and within the United States, to competitive market conditions. In addition, in some instances we have agreed or may in the future agree with a bottler with respect to concentrate pricing on a prospective basis for specified time periods. Also, in some markets,However, in an effort to allow our Company and our bottling partners to grow together through shared value, aligned financial objectives and the flexibility necessary to meet consumers'consumers’ always changing needs and tastes, we worked with our bottling partners to develop and implementhave implemented an incidence-based concentrate pricing model.model in most markets. Under this model, the concentrate price we charge is impacted by a number of factors, including, but not limited to, bottler pricing, the channels in which the finished products produced from the concentrates are sold, and package mix.
As further discussed below, our bottler'sbottler’s agreements for territories outside the United States differ in some respects from our bottler'sbottler’s agreements for territories within the United States.
Bottler's
5


Bottler’s Agreements Outside the United States
Bottler'sBottler’s agreements between us and our authorized bottlers outside the United States generally are of stated duration, subject in some cases to possible extensions or renewals. Generally, these bottler'sbottler’s agreements are subject to termination by the Company following the occurrence of certain designated events, including defined events of default and certain changes in ownership or control of the bottlers. Most of the bottler'sbottler’s agreements in force between us and bottlers outside the United States authorize the bottlers to manufacture and distribute fountain syrups, usually on a nonexclusive basis.
In certain parts of the world outside the United States, we have not granted comprehensive beverage production and distribution rights to the bottlers. In such instances, we have authorized certain bottlers to (1) manufactureprepare and package Company Trademark

Beverages for sale to other bottlers or (2) purchase Company Trademark Beverages from other bottlers for sale and distribution throughout their respective designated territories, often on a nonexclusive basis.
Bottler'sBottler’s Agreements Within the United States
In the United States, most bottlers operate under a "comprehensive beverage agreement" ("CBA"contract to which we generally refer as a “Comprehensive Beverage Agreement” (“CBA”) that is of stated duration, subject in most cases to renewal rights of bottlers and in some cases to renewal rights of the Company. CertainA small number of bottlers continue to operate under legacy bottler'sbottler’s agreements with no stated expiration date for Trademark Coca-Cola Beverages and other cola-flavored beverages. The bottler'sCompany Trademark Beverages. In all instances, the bottler’s agreements in the United States are subject to termination by the Company for nonperformance or upon the occurrence of certain defined events of default that may vary from contract to contract.
Certain U.S. bottlers which werehave been granted certain additional exclusive territory rights for the distribution, promotion, marketing and sale of Company-owned and licensed beverage productsbrands (as defined by the CBAs) in connection with the refranchising of bottler territories that had previously been managed by Coca-Cola Refreshments ("CCR"),. We refer to these bottlers as “expanding participating bottlers” or “EPBs.” EPBs operate under "expanding bottler CBAs" (“EPB CBAs”) under which the Company generally retained the rights to produce the applicable beverage products for territories not covered by specific manufacturing agreements, and such bottlers purchase from the Company (or from Company-authorized manufacturing bottlers) substantially all of the finished beverage products needed in order to service the customers in these territories. The expanding bottlerEach EPB CBA has a term of 10 years and is renewable, in most cases by the bottler, and in some cases by the Company, indefinitely for successive additional terms of 10 years each and includes additional requirements that provide for, among other things, a binding national governance model, mandatory incidence pricing and certain core performance requirements. The Company has also entered into manufacturing agreements that authorize certain expanding bottlersEPBs that have executed expanding bottlerEPB CBAs to manufacture certain beverage products for their own account and for supply to other bottlers.
In addition, certain U.S. bottlers that were not granted additional exclusive territory rights, converted or agreedwhich we refer to convertas “participating bottlers,” converted their legacy bottler'sbottler’s agreements to a form of CBACBAs, to which we sometimes refer as "non-expanding“participating bottler CBA." This formCBAs,” each of CBAwhich has a term of 10 years, and is renewable by the bottler indefinitely for successive additional terms of 10 years each, and is substantially similar in most material respects to the expanding bottler CBA,EPB CBAs, including with respect to requirements for a binding national governance model and mandatory incidence pricing, but includes core performance requirements that vary in certain respects from those in the expanding bottler CBA.EPB CBAs.
Those bottlers that have not signed a CBACBAs continue to operate under legacy bottler'sbottler’s agreements that include pricing formulas that generally provide for a baseline price for certain Trademark Coca-Cola Beverages and other cola-flavored Company Trademark Beverages. This baseline price may be adjusted periodically by the Company, up to a maximum indexed ceiling price, and is adjusted quarterly based upon changes in certain sugar or sweetener prices, as applicable. The U.S. unit case volume manufactured,prepared, packaged, sold and distributed under these legacy bottler'sbottler’s agreements is not material.
Under the terms of the bottler'sbottler’s agreements, bottlers in the United States generally are not authorized to manufacture fountain syrups. Rather, the Company manufactures and sells fountain syrups to authorized fountain wholesalers (including certain authorized bottlers) and some fountain retailers. These wholesalers in turn sell the syrups, or deliver them on our behalf, to restaurants and other retailers.
PromotionsPromotional and Marketing Programs
In addition to conducting our own independent advertising and marketing activities, we may provide promotional and marketing support and/or funds to our bottlers. In most cases, we do this on a discretionary basis under the terms of commitment letters or agreements, even though we are not obligated to do so under the terms of the bottler's or distributionbottler’s agreements between our Company and the bottlers. Also, on a discretionary basis in most cases, our Company may develop and introduce new products, packages and equipment to assist the bottlers. Likewise, in many instances, we provide promotional and marketing servicessupport and/or funds and/or dispensing equipment and repair services to fountain and bottle/can retailers, typically pursuant to marketing agreements. The aggregate amount provided by our Company to bottlers, resellers orand other customers of our Company'sCompany’s products, principally for participation in promotional and marketing programs, was $4.3$4.7 billion in 2018.2021.
6


Investments in Bottling Operations
Most of our branded beverage products are manufactured,prepared, packaged, distributed and sold and distributed by independent bottling partners. However, from time to time we acquire or take control of a bottling operations,operation, often in underperforming markets where we believe we can use our resources and expertise to improve performance. Owning such a controlling interestbottling operation enables us to compensate for limited local resources; help focus the bottler'sbottler’s sales and marketing programs; assist in the development of the bottler'sbottler’s business and information systems; and establish an appropriate capital structure for the bottler. In line with our long-term bottling strategy, we may periodically consider options for divesting or reducing our ownership interest in a Company-owned or -controlled bottler,consolidated bottling operation, typically by selling all or a portion of our interest in a particularthe bottling operation to an independent bottler to improve Coca-Cola system efficiency. When we sell our interest in a consolidated bottling operation to one of our otheran independent bottling partnerspartner in which we have an equity

method investment, our Company continues to participate in the bottler'sbottler’s results of operations through our share of the equity method investee'sinvestee’s earnings or losses.
In addition, from time to time we make equity investments representing noncontrolling interests in selected bottling operations with the intention of maximizing the strength and efficiency of the Coca-Cola system'ssystem’s production, marketing, sales and distribution capabilities around the world by providing expertise and resources to strengthen those businesses. These investments are intended to result in increases in unit case volume, net revenues and profits at the bottler level, which in turn generate increased sales for our Company'sCompany’s concentrate business.operations. When our equity investment provides us with the ability to exercise significant influence over the investee bottler'sbottler’s operating and financial policies, we account for the investment under the equity method, and we sometimes refer to such a bottler as an "equity method investee bottler" or "equity method investee."method.
Seasonality
Sales of our nonalcoholic ready-to-drink beverages are somewhat seasonal, with the second and third calendar quarters accounting for the highest sales volumes. The volume of sales in the beverage business may be affected by weather conditions.
Competition
The nonalcoholic beverage segment of the commercial beverage industry is highly competitive consistingand consists of numerous companies, ranging from small or emerging to very large and well established. These include companies that, like our Company, compete globally in multiple geographic areas, as well as businesses that are primarily regional or local in operation. Competitive products include numerous nonalcoholic sparkling soft drinks; various water products, including flavored and enhanced waters; juices, juice drinks and nectars; fruit drinks and dilutables (including syrups and powdered drinks)powders); coffees andcoffees; teas; energy drinks; sports and other performance-enhancing drinks; milk and other dairy-based drinks; plant-based beverages; functional beverages, including vitamin-based products and relaxation beverages; and various other nonalcoholic beverages. These competitive beveragesproducts are sold to consumers in both ready-to-drink and other than ready-to-drinknon-ready-to-drink form. The Company has directly entered the alcohol beverage segment in numerous markets outside the United States. In the United States, the Company has authorized alcohol-licensed third parties to use certain of our brands on alcohol beverages. Competitive products include all flavored alcohol beverages of varying alcohol bases. In many of the countries in which we do business, including the United States, PepsiCo, Inc., is one of oura primary competitors.competitor. Other significant competitors include, but are not limited to, Nestlé S.A., Keurig Dr Pepper Inc., Groupe Danone Mondelēz International, Inc.S.A., The Kraft Heinz Company, Suntory Beverage & Food Limited, Unilever, AB InBev, Kirin Holdings, Heineken N.V., Diageo and Unilever.Red Bull GmbH. We also compete against numerous regional and local companies and, increasingly, against smaller companies that are developing micro brandsmicrobrands and selling them directly to consumers through e-commerce retailers and other e-commerce platforms. In addition, in some markets, we compete against retailers that have developed their own store or private labelprivate-label beverage brands.
Competitive factors impacting our business include, but are not limited to, pricing, advertising, sales promotion programs,     in-store displays and point-of-sale marketing, digital marketing, product and ingredient innovation, increased efficiency in production techniques, the introduction of new packaging as well as new vending and dispensing equipment, contracting with marketing assets (theaters, sports arenas, universities, etc.), and brand and trademark development and protection.
Our competitive strengths include leading brands with high levels of consumer acceptance;recognition and loyalty; a worldwide network of bottlers and distributors of Company products; sophisticated marketing capabilities; and a talented group of dedicated associates.employees. Our competitive challenges include strong competitioncompetitors in all geographic regions and,regions; in many countries, a concentrated retail sector with powerful buyers able to freely choose among Company products, products of competitive beverage suppliers and individual retailers'retailers’ own store or private labelprivate-label beverage brands.brands; new industry entrants; and dramatic shifts in consumer shopping methods and patterns due to a rapidly evolving digital landscape.
Raw Materials
Water is a main ingredient in substantially all of our products. While historically we have not experienced significant water supply difficulties, water is a limited natural resource in many parts of the world, and our Company recognizes water availability, quality and sustainability, for both our operations and also the communities where we operate, as one of the key challenges facing our business.
7


In addition to water, the principal raw materials used in our business are nutritive and non-nutritive sweeteners. In the United States, the principal nutritive sweetener is high fructose corn syrup ("HFCS"(“HFCS”), which is nutritionally equivalent to sugar. HFCS is available from numerous domestic sources and has historically been subject to fluctuations in its market price. The principal nutritive sweetener used by our business outside the United States is sucrose, i.e., table sugar, which is also available from numerous sources and has historically been subject to fluctuations in its market price. Our Company generally has not experienced any difficulties in obtaining its requirements for nutritive sweeteners. In the United States, we purchase HFCS to meet our and our bottlers'bottlers’ requirements with the assistance of Coca-Cola Bottlers'Bottlers’ Sales & Services Company LLC ("CCBSS"(“CCBSS”). CCBSS is a limited liability company that is owned by authorized Coca-Cola bottlers doing business in the United States. Among other things, CCBSS provides procurement services to our CompanyNorth American operations and to our U.S. bottling partners for the purchase of various goods and services, in the United States, including HFCS.
The principal non-nutritive sweeteners we use in our business are aspartame, acesulfame potassium, sucralose, saccharin, cyclamate and steviol glycosides. Generally, these raw materials are readily available from numerous sources. We purchase

sucralose, which we consider a critical raw material, from suppliers in the United States and China. Our Company generally has not experienced major difficulties in obtaining its requirements for non-nutritive sweeteners, and we do not anticipate such difficulties in the future.sweeteners.
Juice and juice concentrate from various fruits, particularly orange juice and orange juice concentrate, are the principal raw materials for our juice and juice drink products. We source our orange juice and orange juice concentrate primarily from Florida and the Southern Hemisphere (particularly Brazil). We work closely with Cutrale Citrus Juices U.S.A., Inc., our primary supplier of orange juice from Florida and Brazil, to ensure an adequate supply of orange juice and orange juice concentrate that meets our Company'sCompany’s standards. However, the citrus industry is impacted by greening disease and the variability of weather conditions.conditions that can impact the quality and supply of orange juice and orange juice concentrate. In particular, freezing weather or hurricanes in central Florida may result in shortages and higher prices for orange juice and orange juice concentrate throughout the industry. In addition, greening disease is reducing the number of citrus trees and increasing grower costs and prices.
We generate most of our coffee revenues through Costa. Costa purchases Rainforest Alliance Certified green coffee through multiple suppliers. While most of Costa’s coffee is sourced as readily available bulked commercial grade from Brazil, Vietnam and Colombia, many of Costa’s suppliers have vertically integrated supply chains with direct access to yields from cooperatives and producer groups.
Our Company-owned or consolidated bottling operations and our non-bottling finished product businessoperations also purchase various other raw materials including, but not limited to, polyethylene terephthalate ("PET"(“PET”) resin, preforms and bottles; glass and aluminum bottles; aluminum and steel cans; plastic closures; aseptic fiber packaging; labels; cartons; cases; postmix packaging; and beverage gases, including carbon dioxide.dioxide and liquid nitrogen. We generally purchase these raw materials from multiple suppliers and historically have not experienced significant shortages.
Patents, Copyrights, Trade Secrets and Trademarks
Our Company owns numerous patents, copyrights and trade secrets and other know-how and technology, which we collectively refer to in this report as "technology."“technology.” This technology generally relates to beverage products and the processes for their production; packages and packaging materials; design and operation of processes and equipment useful for our business; and certain software. Some of the technology is licensed to suppliers and other parties. Trade secrets are an important aspect of our technology, and our sparkling beverage and other beverage formulaeformulas are among the important trade secrets of our Company.
We own numerous trademarks that are very important to our business. Depending upon the jurisdiction, trademarks are valid as long as they are in use and/or their registrations are properly maintained. Pursuant to our bottler'sbottler’s agreements, we authorize our bottlers to use applicable Company trademarks in connection with their manufacture,preparation, packaging, distribution and sale and distribution of Company products. In addition, we grant licenses to third parties from time to time to use certain of our trademarks in conjunction with certain merchandise and food products.
Governmental Regulation
Our Company is required to comply, and it is our policy to comply, with all applicable laws in the numerous countries throughout the world in which we do business. In many jurisdictions, compliance with competition laws is of special importance to us, and our operations may come under special scrutiny by competition law authorities due to our competitive position in those jurisdictions.
In the United States, the safety, production, transportation, distribution, advertising, labeling and sale of our Company'sCompany’s products and their ingredients are subject to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act; the Federal Trade Commission Act; the Lanham Act; state consumer protection laws; competition laws; federal, state and local workplace health and safety laws; various federal, state and local environmental protection laws; privacy and personal data protection laws; and various other federal, state and local statutes and regulations. Outside the United States, our business is subject to numerous similar statutes and regulations, as well as other legal and regulatory requirements.
8


Under athe Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986 (“Proposition 65”) of the state of California, law known as Proposition 65, if the state has determined that a substance causes cancer or harms human reproduction or development, a warning must be provided for any product sold in the state that exposes consumers to that substance.substance, unless the conditions of an exemption (described below) can be met. The state maintains lists of these substances and periodically adds other substances to these lists. Proposition 65 exposes all food and beverage producers to the possibility of having to provide warnings on their products in California because it does not provide for any generally applicable quantitative threshold below which the presence of a listed substance is exempt from the warning requirement. Consequently, theThe detection of even a trace amount of a listed substance can subject an affected product to the requirement of a warning label. However, Proposition 65 does not require a warning if the manufacturer of a product can demonstrate that the use of that product exposes consumers to a daily quantity of a listed substance that is:
below a "safe harbor"“safe harbor” threshold that may be established;
naturally occurring;
the result of necessary cooking; or
subject to another applicable exemption.

One or more substances that are currently on the Proposition 65 lists, or that may be added in the future, can be detected in certain Company products at low levels that are safe. With respect to substances that have not yet been listed under Proposition 65, the Company takes the position that listing is not scientifically justified. With respect to substances that are already listed, the Company takes the position that the presence of each such substance in Company products is subject to an applicable exemption from the warning requirement or that the product is otherwise in compliance with Proposition 65. TheHowever, the state of California and other parties however, have in the past taken a contrary position and may do so in the future.
Bottlers of our beverage products presently offer, and useamong other beverage containers, nonrefillable recyclable containers in the United States and various other markets around the world. Some of these bottlers also offer and use refillable containers, which are also recyclable. Legal requirements apply in various jurisdictions in the United States and overseas requiring that deposits or certain ecotaxes or fees be charged in connection with the sale, marketing and use of certain beverage containers. The precise requirements imposed by these measures vary. Other types of statutes and regulations relating to beverage container deposits, recycling, ecotaxes and/or product stewardship also apply in various jurisdictions in the United States and overseas. We anticipate that additional such legal requirements may be proposed or enacted in the future at local,federal, state and federallocal levels, both in the United States and elsewhere.elsewhere around the world.
All of our Company'sCompany’s facilities and other operations in the United States and elsewhere around the world are subject to various environmental protection statutes and regulations, including those relating to the use of water resources and the discharge of wastewater. Our policy is to comply with all such legal requirements. Compliance with these provisions has not had, and we do not expect such compliance towill have, any material adverse effect on our Company'sCompany’s capital expenditures, net income or competitive position.
We are also subject to various federal, state and international laws and regulations related to privacy and data protection, including the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”) as well as the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 (“CCPA”), which became effective on January 1, 2020, and its extension, the California Privacy Rights Act (“CPRA”), which will take effect on January 1, 2023. The interpretation and application of data privacy, cross-border data transfers and data protection laws and regulations are often uncertain and are evolving in the United States and internationally, such as in the European Union, China and other jurisdictions. We monitor pending and proposed legislation and regulatory initiatives to ascertain their relevance to and potential impact on our business and develop strategies to address regulatory trends and developments, including any required changes to our privacy and data protection compliance programs and policies. Globally, we see a growing trend toward data protection laws and regulations increasing in complexity and number, and we anticipate that our obligations will expand commensurately.
Human Capital Management
Our people and culture agendas are critical business priorities. Our Board of Directors, through the Talent and Compensation Committee, provides oversight of the Company’s policies and strategies relating to talent, leadership and culture, including diversity, equity and inclusion, as well as the Company’s compensation philosophy and programs. The Talent and Compensation Committee also evaluates and approves the Company’s compensation plans, policies and programs applicable to our senior executives. In addition, the Committee on Directors and Corporate Governance of the Board of Directors oversees succession planning and talent development for our senior executives.
Employees
We believe people are our most important asset, and we strive to attract and retain high-performing talent. As of December 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, our Company had approximately 62,60079,000 and 61,80080,300 employees, respectively, of which approximately 11,4009,400 and 12,400,9,300, respectively, were located in the United States. Our Company, through its divisions and subsidiaries, is a party to numerous collective bargaining agreements. As of December 31, 2018,2021, approximately 900700 employees in North America were
9


covered by collective bargaining agreements. These agreements typically have terms of three years to five years. We currently anticipate that we will be able to successfully renegotiate such agreements on satisfactory terms when they expire.
The Company believesDiversity, Equity and Inclusion
We believe that its relationsa diverse, equitable and inclusive workplace that mirrors the markets we serve is a strategic business priority and critical to the Company’s success. We take a comprehensive view of diversity, equity and inclusion across different races, ethnicities, tribes, religions, socioeconomic backgrounds, generations, abilities, and expressions of gender and sexual identity.
As of December 31, 2021, we had approximately 8,400 employees located in the United States, excluding the employees of the Global Ventures operating segment, fairlife, LLC and BA Sports Nutrition, LLC. Of these employees, 39 percent and 46 percent were female and people of color, respectively.
We are focused on social justice issues, including racial and gender equity, both in the United States and around the world. In 2021, we announced our 2030 aspirations to be 50 percent led by women globally, and in the United States, to reflect the U.S. Census racial and ethnic representation at all job grade levels. Each of our operating units outside the United States has developed locally relevant diversity, equity and inclusion aspirations. Diversity and inclusion metrics, which highlight progress and help drive accountability, are shared with itsour senior leaders on a quarterly basis. Our Global Women’s Leadership Council, composed of eight executives, focuses on accelerating the development and promotion of women into roles of increasing responsibility and influence.
We conduct annual pay equity analyses, with regard to gender globally and race/ethnicity in the United States, to help ensure our base pay structures are fair and to identify and address potential issues or disparities. We make adjustments to base pay, where appropriate. Also, as permitted by local law, during the annual rewards cycle, we perform an adverse impact analysis on base pay, annual incentives and long-term incentives to help ensure fairness.
We support many employee-led inclusion networks, which are an integral part of our diversity, equity and inclusion strategy. Our inclusion networks are regionally structured in order to meet relevant local needs, and they provide employees with the opportunity to engage with colleagues globally based on common interests or backgrounds.
Compensation and Benefits
Through comprehensive and competitive compensation and benefits, ongoing employee learning and development, and a focus on health and well-being, we strive to support our employees in all aspects of their lives. Our compensation programs are designed to reinforce our growth agenda and our talent strategy as well as to drive a strong connection between the contributions of our employees and their pay.
We believe the structure of our compensation packages provides the appropriate incentives to attract, retain and motivate our employees. We provide base pay that is competitive and that aligns with employee positions, skill levels, experience and geographic location. In addition to base pay, we seek to reward employees with annual incentive awards, recognition programs, and equity awards for employees at certain job levels.
We also offer competitive employee benefits packages, which vary by country and region. These employee benefits packages may include: 401(k) plan, pension plan, core and supplemental life insurance, financial courses and advisors, employee assistance programs, tuition assistance, commuter assistance, adoption assistance, medical and dental insurance, vision insurance, health savings accounts, health reimbursement and flexible spending accounts, well-being rewards programs, vacation pay, holiday pay, and parental and adoption leave.
Culture and Engagement
As our employees work together to achieve our purpose to “Refresh the World and Make a Difference,” they collectively build and reinforce our culture. Our culture is rooted in our growth mindset, which expects each employee, leader and function to be curious, empowered, inclusive and agile. We use a variety of practices to measure and support progress against these growth behaviors and to ensure that our employees are generally satisfactory.engaged and fulfilled at work. For example, our Performance Enablement and Culture & Engagement Pulse platforms provide regular opportunities for employees across the organization to provide feedback on how their leaders, teammates and work experiences support the growth behaviors. Data from questionnaires are anonymized and plotted against historical results to inform teams and functions on areas of strength and opportunities for improvement. We also encourage regular, live communication across the organization and host quarterly global town halls with our senior leadership that include employee question-and-answer sessions. In addition, function-level town halls are held on a         regular basis.
Leadership, Training and Development
We focus on investing in inspirational leadership, learning opportunities and capabilities to equip our global workforce with the skills they need while improving engagement and retention. We provide a range of formal and informal learning programs, which are designed to help our employees continuously grow and strengthen their skills throughout their careers. We offer a
10


variety of programs that contribute to our leadership, training and development goals, including: Coca-Cola University, a robust catalog of digital content, including courseware from Harvard, eCornell, and LinkedIn Learning; Opportunity Marketplace, a people-centered technology solution that helps connect project opportunities to interested employees who have the capacity, skills and interest in short-term experiences and assignments; and comprehensive enterprise-wide coaching and mentoring programs that support leadership and employee development.
Available Information
The Company maintains a website at the following address: www.coca-colacompany.com. The information on the Company'sCompany’s website is not incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.report. We make available on or through our website certain reports and amendments to those reports that we file with or furnish to the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"(“SEC”) in accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended ("(“Exchange Act"Act”). These include our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and our Current Reports on Form 8-K. We make this information available on our website free of charge as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file the information with, or furnish it to, the SEC. In addition, we routinely post on the “Investors” page of our website news releases, announcements and other statements about our business and results of operations, some of which may contain information that may be deemed material to investors. Therefore, we encourage investors to monitor the “Investors” page of our website and review the information we post on that page.
The SEC maintains a website that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC at the following address: http://www.sec.gov.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the following factors, which could materially affect our business, financial condition orand results of operations in future periods. The risks described below are not the only risks facing our Company. Additional risks not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations in future periods.
ObesityRISKS RELATED TO OUR OPERATIONS
The COVID-19 pandemic and other health-related concernsrelated ongoing impacts may reducehave a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
The COVID-19 pandemic and the related actions by governments around the world to attempt to contain the spread of the virus have negatively impacted, and could continue to negatively impact, our business globally. Our recovery has been asynchronous and the full extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic will affect our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows will depend on future developments that are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted, including, among others, new information which may emerge concerning the pandemic, vaccine adoption rates (including boosters) and the effectiveness of vaccines in limiting or stopping the spread of COVID-19, either over the long term or against new, emerging variants of COVID-19, and any related actions by governments.
The extent and nature of government actions related to the COVID-19 pandemic varied throughout 2020 and 2021 based upon the then-current extent and severity of the COVID-19 pandemic within the respective markets. At times we experienced a decrease in sales of certain of our products in markets around the world, including consumer demand shifting to more at-home consumption versus away-from-home consumption. While in 2021 we have experienced improved trends in away-from-home channels and improved margins, if COVID-19 infection rates increase, the pandemic intensifies or expands geographically, or continued efforts to curb the pandemic are ineffective, the negative impacts of the pandemic on our sales could be more prolonged and may become more severe than we are currently experiencing. In addition, continuing economic and political uncertainties, such as increased unemployment, decreases in disposable income, declines in consumer confidence, or economic slowdowns or recessions in any of our major markets, may slow down or prevent the recovery of the demand for someour products or may erode such demand.
The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted and could continue to disrupt our global supply chain. We and our bottling partners have experienced temporary disruptions in certain of our products.operations; delays in delivery of concentrates, ingredients, packaging and equipment; temporary plant closures; production slowdowns; and difficulty or delays in sourcing key ingredients and beverage containers. We and our bottling partners may face similar disruptions in the future, which may increase supply chain and packaging costs, or may result in an inability to secure key ingredients and inputs, which could cause delays in delivering our products to our customers and consumers. Although we are unable to predict the impact on our ability to source materials in the future, we expect supply chain pressures to continue into 2022.
There is growing concern among consumers, public health professionals and government agencies about the health problems associated with obesity. Increasing public concern about obesity; other health-related public concerns surrounding consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages; possible new or increased taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages by government entities to reduce consumption or to raise revenue; additional governmental regulations concerning the marketing, labeling, packaging or sale of our sugar-sweetened beverages; and negative publicity resulting from actual or threatened legal actions against us or other companies in our industry relatingIn addition to the marketing, labeling or sale of sugar-sweetened beveragesabove risks, the COVID-19 pandemic may reduce demand for, or increase the cost of, our sugar-sweetened beverages, which could adversely affect our profitability.


If we do not address evolving consumer product and shopping preferences, our business could suffer.
Consumer product preferences have evolved and continue to evolve as a result of, amongexacerbate other things, health, wellness and nutrition considerations, including concerns regarding caloric intake associated with sugar-sweetened beverages and the perceived undesirability of artificial ingredients; shifting consumer demographics; changes in consumer tastes and needs coupled with a rapid expansion of beverage options; changes in consumer lifestyles; concerns regarding location of origin or source of ingredients and raw materials and the environmental and sustainability impact of the product manufacturing process; consumer emphasis on transparencyrisks related to our products and packaging; and competitive product and pricing pressures. In addition, in many of our markets, shopping patterns are being affected by the digital evolution, with consumers rapidly embracing shopping by way of mobile device applications, e-commerce retailers and e-commerce websites or platforms. If we failbusiness, including risks related to address past changes in consumer productthe retail landscape or the loss of key retail or foodservice customers; fluctuations in input costs, inflation rates, and shopping preferences, or doforeign currency exchange rates; and the ability of third-party service providers and business partners to fulfill their
11


respective commitments and responsibilities to us in a timely manner and in accordance with the agreed-upon terms. The continuing evolution of the pandemic may also present risks not successfully anticipate and prepare for future changes in such preferences, our share of sales, revenue growth and overall financial results could be negatively affected.currently known to us.
Increased competition could hurt our business.
We operate in the highly competitive nonalcoholic beverage segment of the commercial beverage industry. For additional information regarding the competitive environment in which we operate, including the names of certain of our significant competitors, refer to the heading "Competition"“Competition” set forth in Part I, "Item“Item 1. Business"Business” of this report. Our ability to gainmaintain or maintaingain share of sales in the global market or in various local markets may be limited as a result of actions by competitors. Competitive pressures may cause usthe Company and our bottling partners to reduce prices we charge customers or may restrict our and our bottlers'bottlers’ ability to increase such prices, as may be necessary in response to commodity and other cost increases. Such pressures may also increase marketing costs andalong with in-store placement and slotting fees. In addition, the rapid growth of e‑commerce may create additional consumer price deflation by, among other things, facilitating comparison shopping.shopping, and could potentially threaten the value of some of our legacy route-to-market strategies and thus negatively affect revenues. If we do not continuously strengthen our capabilities in marketing and innovation to maintain ourconsumer interest, brand loyalty and market share while we selectively expand into other profitable categories in the nonalcoholic beverage segment of the commercial beverage industry, our business could be negatively affected.
Water scarcity and poor quality could negatively impact the Coca-Cola system's costs and capacity.
Water is a main ingredient in substantially all of our products, is vital to the production of the agricultural ingredients on which our business relies and is needed in our manufacturing process. It also is critical to the prosperity of the communities we serve. Water is a limited resource in many parts of the world, facing unprecedented challenges from overexploitation, increasing demand for food and other consumer and industrial products whose manufacturing processes require water, increasing pollution, poor management, sociopolitical tensions due to lack of public infrastructure in certain areas of the world and the effects of climate change. As the demand for water continues to increase around the world, and as water becomes scarcer and the quality of available water deteriorates, the Coca-Cola system may incur higher costs or face capacity constraints and the possibility of reputational damage, which could adversely affect our profitability or net operating revenues in the long run.
Increased demand for food products and decreased agricultural productivity may negatively affect our business.
We and our bottling partners use in the manufacture of our beverage products a number of key ingredients that are derived from agricultural commodities such as sugarcane, corn, sugar beets, citrus, coffee and tea. Increased demand for food products and decreased agricultural productivity in certain regions of the world as a result of changing weather patterns and other factors may limit the availability or increase the cost of such agricultural commodities and could impact the food security of communities around the world. If we are unable to implement programs focused on economic opportunity and environmental sustainability to address these agricultural challenges and fail to make a strategic impact on food security through joint efforts with bottlers, farmers, communities, suppliers and key partners, as well as through our increased and continued investment in sustainable agriculture, our ability to source raw materials for use in our manufacturing processes and the affordability of our products and ultimately our business and results of operations could be negatively impacted.
Product safety and quality concerns could negatively affect our business.
Our success depends in large part on our ability to maintain consumer confidence in the safety and quality of all of our products. We have rigorous product safety and quality standards, which we expect our operations as well as our bottling partners to meet. However, despite our strong commitment to product safety and quality, we or our bottling partners may not always meet these standards, particularly as we expand our product offerings through innovation or acquisitions into beverage categories, such as value-added dairy and plant-based beverages, that are beyond our traditional range of beverage products. If we or our bottling partners fail to comply with applicable product safety and quality standards, or if our beverage products taken to the market are or become contaminated or adulterated by any means, we may be required to conduct costly product recalls and may become subject to product liability claims and negative publicity, which could cause our business to suffer.

Public debate and concern about perceived negative health consequences of certain ingredients, such as non-nutritive sweeteners and biotechnology-derived substances, and of other substances present in our beverage products or packaging materials, may reduce demand for our beverage products.
Public debate and concern about perceived negative health consequences of certain ingredients in our beverage products, such as non-nutritive sweeteners and biotechnology-derived substances; substances that are present in our beverage products naturally or that occur as a result of the manufacturing process, such as 4-methylimidazole ("4-MEI," a chemical compound that is formed during the manufacturing of certain types of caramel coloring used in cola-type beverages); or substances used in packaging materials, such as bisphenol A ("BPA," an odorless, tasteless food-grade chemical commonly used in the food and beverage industries as a component in the coating of the interior of cans), may affect consumers' preferences and cause them to shift away from some of our beverage products. In addition, increasing public concern about actual or perceived health consequences of the presence of such ingredients or substances in our beverage products or in packaging materials, whether or not justified, could result in additional governmental regulations concerning the marketing, labeling or sale of our beverages; possible new or increased taxes on our beverages by government entities; and negative publicity, or actual or threatened legal actions against us or other companies in our industry, all of which could damage the reputation of, and may reduce demand for, our beverage products.
If we are not successful in our innovation activities, our financial results may be negatively affected.
Achieving our business growth objectives depends in part on our ability to evolve and improve our existing beverage products through innovation and to successfully develop, introduce and market new beverage products. The success of our innovation activities in turn depends on our ability to correctly anticipate customer and consumer acceptance and trends; obtain, maintain and enforce necessary intellectual property protections; and avoid infringing on the intellectual property rights of others. If we are not successful in our innovation activities, we may not be able to achieve our growth objectives, which may have a negative impact on our financial results.
If we are unable to protect our information systems against service interruption, misappropriation of data or breaches of security, our operations could be disrupted, we may suffer financial losses and our reputation may be damaged.
We rely on networks and information systems and other technology ("information systems"), including the Internet and third-party hosted services, to support a variety of business processes and activities, including procurement and supply chain, manufacturing, distribution, invoicing and collection of payments, employee processes, consumer marketing, mergers and acquisitions and research and development. We use information systems to process financial information and results of operations for internal reporting purposes and to comply with regulatory financial reporting and legal and tax requirements. In addition, we depend on information systems for digital marketing activities and electronic communications among our locations around the world and between Company personnel and our bottlers and other customers, suppliers and consumers. Because information systems are critical to many of the Company's operating activities, our business may be impacted by system shutdowns, service disruptions or security breaches. These incidents may be caused by failures during routine operations such as system upgrades or by user errors, as well as network or hardware failures, malicious or disruptive software, unintentional or malicious actions of employees or contractors, cyberattacks by common hackers, criminal groups or nation-state organizations or social-activist (hacktivist) organizations, geopolitical events, natural disasters, failures or impairments of telecommunications networks, or other catastrophic events. In addition, such incidents could result in unauthorized or accidental disclosure of material confidential information or regulated individual personal data. If our information systems suffer severe damage, disruption or shutdown and our business continuity plans do not effectively resolve the issues in a timely manner, we could experience delays in reporting our financial results, and we may lose revenue and profits as a result of our inability to timely manufacture, distribute, invoice and collect payments for concentrate or finished products. Unauthorized or accidental access to, or destruction, loss, alteration, disclosure, falsification or unavailability of, information could result in violations of data privacy laws and regulations, damage to the reputation and credibility of the Company, loss of opportunities to acquire or divest of businesses or brands and loss of ability to commercialize products developed through research and development efforts and, therefore, could have a negative impact on net operating revenues. In addition, we may suffer financial and reputational damage because of lost or misappropriated confidential information belonging to us, our current or former employees, our bottling partners, other customers or suppliers, or consumers or other data subjects, and may become exposed to legal action and increased regulatory oversight. The Company could also be required to spend significant financial and other resources to remedy the damage caused by a security breach or to repair or replace networks and information systems.
Like most major corporations, the Company's information systems are a target of attacks. In addition, third-party providers of data hosting or cloud services, as well as our bottling partners, distributors, joint venture partners or suppliers, may experience cybersecurity incidents that may involve data we share with them. Although the incidents that we have experienced to date have not had a material effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations, there can be no assurance that such incidents will not have a material adverse effect on us in the future. In order to address risks to our information systems, we continue to make investments in personnel, technologies, cyber insurance and training of Company personnel. The Company

maintains an information risk management program which is supervised by information technology management and reviewed by a cross-functional committee. As part of this program, reports that include analysis of emerging risks as well as the Company's plans and strategies to address them are regularly prepared and presented to senior management and the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors.
If we fail to comply with personal data protection laws, we could be subject to adverse publicity, government enforcement actions and/or private litigation, which could negatively affect our business and operating results.
In the ordinary course of our business, we receive, process, transmit and store information relating to identifiable individuals ("personal data"), primarily employees and former employees. As a result, we are subject to various U.S. federal and state and foreign laws and regulations relating to personal data. These laws have been subject to frequent changes, and new legislation in this area may be enacted in other jurisdictions at any time. In the European Union ("EU"), the General Data Protection Regulation ("GDPR") became effective on May 25, 2018 for all member states. The GDPR includes operational requirements for companies receiving or processing personal data of EU residents that are partially different from those that had previously been in place and includes significant penalties for noncompliance. The changes introduced by the GDPR, as well as any other changes to existing personal data protection laws and the introduction of such laws in other jurisdictions, have subjected and may continue in the future to subject the Company to, among other things, additional costs and expenses and have required and may in the future require costly changes to our business practices and security systems, policies, procedures and practices. There is no assurance that our security controls over personal data, the training of employees and vendors on data privacy and data security, and the policies, procedures and practices we implemented or may implement in the future will prevent the improper disclosure of personal data. Improper disclosure of personal data in violation of the GDPR and/or of other personal data protection laws could harm our reputation, cause loss of consumer confidence, subject us to government enforcement actions (including fines), or result in private litigation against us, which could result in loss of revenue, increased costs, liability for monetary damages, fines and/or criminal prosecution, all of which could negatively affect our business and operating results.
If we are not successful in our efforts to digitize the Coca-Cola system, our financial performance will be negatively affected.
The digital evolution is affecting how we interact with consumers, customers, suppliers, bottlers and other business partners and stakeholders. We believe that our future success will depend in part on our ability to adapt to and thrive in the digital environment. Therefore, one of our top priorities is to digitize the Coca-Cola system by, among other things, creating more relevant and more personalized experiences wherever our system interacts with consumers, whether in a digital environment or through digital devices in an otherwise physical environment; finding ways to create more powerful digital tools and capabilities for the Coca‑Cola system's retail customers to enable them to grow their businesses; and digitizing operations through the use of data, artificial intelligence, automation, robotics and digital devices to increase efficiency and productivity. If we are not successful in our efforts to digitize the Coca-Cola system, our ability to increase sales and reduce costs may be negatively affected and the cost and expenses we have incurred or may incur in connection with our digitization initiatives may adversely impact our financial performance.
Changes in the retail landscape or the loss of key retail or foodservice customers could adversely affect our financial performance.results.
Our industry is being affected by the trend toward consolidation in, and the blurring of the lines between, retail channels, particularly in Europe and the United States. Larger retailers may seek lower prices from us and our bottling partners, may demand increased marketing or promotional expenditures, and may be more likely to use their distribution networks to introduce and develop private labelprivate-label brands, any of which could negatively affect the Coca-Cola system'ssystem’s profitability. In addition, in developed markets discounters and value stores are growing at a rapid pace, while in emerging and developing markets modern trade is growing at a faster pace than traditional trade outlets. Our industry is also being affected by the rapid growth in sales through e-commerce retailers, e-commerce websites, mobile commerce applications and subscription services, which may result in a shift away from physical retail operations to digital channels. As we and our bottling partners build the Coca-Cola system's e-commerce capabilities, we may not be able to develop and maintain successful relationships with existing and new e-commerce retailers without experiencing a deterioration of our relationships with key customers operating physical retail channels. If we are unable to successfully adapt to the rapidly changing retail landscape, including the rapid growth in digital commerce, our share of sales, volume growth and overall financial results could be negatively affected. In addition, our success depends in part on our ability to maintain good relationships with key retail and foodservice customers. The loss of one or more of our key retail or foodservice customers could have an adverse effect on our financial performance.
If we are unable to expand our operations in emerging and developing markets, our growth rate could be negatively affected.
Our success depends in part on our ability to grow our business in emerging and developing markets, which in turn depends on economic and political conditions in those markets and on our ability to work with local bottlers to make necessary

infrastructure enhancements to production facilities, distribution networks, sales equipment and technology. Additionally, we rely on local availability of talented management and employees to establish and manage our operations in these markets. Scarcity of, or heavy competition for, talented employee resources could impede our abilities in such markets. Moreover, the supply of our products in emerging and developing markets must match consumers'consumer demand for those products. Due to product price, limited purchasing power and cultural differences, there can be no assurance that our products willmay not be accepted in any particular emerging or developing market.
FluctuationsIf we do not successfully manage the possible negative consequences of our productivity initiatives, our business operations could be adversely affected.
We believe that improved productivity is essential to achieving our long-term growth objectives and, therefore, a leading priority of our Company is to design and implement the most effective and efficient business model possible. Consequently, we continuously search for productivity opportunities in foreign currency exchange ratesour business. Some of the actions we may take from time to time in pursuing these opportunities may become a distraction for our managers and employees and may disrupt our ongoing business operations; cause deterioration in employee morale which may make it more difficult for us to retain or attract qualified managers and employees; disrupt or weaken the internal control structures of the affected business operations; and give rise to
12


negative publicity which could haveaffect our corporate reputation. If we are unable to successfully manage the possible negative consequences of our productivity initiatives, our business operations could be adversely affected.
If we are unable to attract or retain a material adverse effecthighly skilled and diverse workforce, our business could be negatively affected.
The success of our business depends on our financial results.
We earn revenues, pay expenses, own assets and incur liabilities in countries using currencies other than the U.S. dollar, including the euro, the Japanese yen, the Brazilian realCompany’s and the Mexican peso. In 2018, we used 72 functional currencies in additionCoca-Cola system’s ability to the U.S. dollarattract, hire, develop, motivate and derived $20.5 billion of net operating revenues from operations outside the United States. Because our consolidated financial statements are presented in U.S. dollars, we must translate revenues, incomeretain a highly skilled and expenses,diverse workforce as well as assetson our success in nurturing a culture that supports our growth and liabilities, into U.S. dollars at exchange ratesaligns employees around the Company’s purpose and work that matters most. Competition and compensation expectations for existing and prospective personnel have increased. In addition, the broader labor market is experiencing a shortage of qualified workers which has further increased the competition we face for qualified employees. We may not be able to successfully compete for, attract or retain the highly skilled and diverse workforce that we want and that our future business needs may require, such as employees with e-commerce, social media and digital marketing and advertising skills, and/or digital and analytics capabilities. Changes in effect duringimmigration laws and policies could also make it more difficult for us to recruit or atrelocate highly skilled technical, professional and management personnel to meet our business needs. In addition, the endunexpected loss of each reporting period. Therefore, increases or decreasesexperienced and highly skilled employees due to an increase in aggressive recruiting for best-in-class talent could deplete our institutional knowledge base and erode our competitiveness. Failure to attract, hire, develop, motivate and retain highly skilled and diverse talent; to meet our goals related to fostering an inclusive and diverse culture, including increasing the number of underrepresented employees in the valueUnited States to develop and implement an adequate succession plan for our management team; to maintain a corporate culture that fosters innovation, collaboration and inclusion; or to design and successfully implement flexible work models that meet the expectations of employees and prospective employees could disrupt our operations and adversely affect our business and our future success.
Increases in the cost, disruption of supply or shortages of energy or fuel could affect our profitability.
Our consolidated bottling operations operate a large fleet of trucks and other motor vehicles to distribute and deliver
beverage products to customers. In addition, we use a significant amount of electricity, natural gas and other energy sources to operate our production plants and the bottling plants and distribution facilities operated by our consolidated bottling operations. An increase in the price, disruption of supply or shortage of fuel and other energy sources in countries where we have production plants, or in markets where our consolidated bottling operations operate, which may be caused by increasing demand, by events such as natural disasters, power outages and extreme weather, or by government regulations, taxes, policies or programs designed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to address climate change, could increase our operating costs and negatively impact our profitability. Our independent bottling partners also operate large fleets of trucks and other motor vehicles to distribute and deliver beverage products to their own customers and use a significant amount of electricity, natural gas and other energy sources to operate their own bottling plants and distribution facilities. An increase in the price, disruption of supply or shortage of fuel and other energy sources in any of the U.S. dollar againstmajor markets in which our independent bottling partners operate could increase the affected independent bottling partners’ operating costs and thus could indirectly negatively impact our results of operations.
Increases in the cost, disruption of supply or shortages of ingredients, other currenciesraw materials, packaging materials, aluminum cans and other containers could harm our business.
We and our bottling partners use various ingredients in our business, including HFCS, sucrose, aspartame, acesulfame potassium, sucralose, saccharin, cyclamate, steviol glycosides, ascorbic acid, citric acid, phosphoric acid, caffeine and caramel color; other raw materials such as coffee, orange and other fruit juice and juice concentrates; packaging materials such as PET, bio-based PET and recycled PET for bottles; and aluminum cans and other containers. For additional information regarding ingredients, other raw materials, packaging materials and containers we use in our business, refer to the heading “Raw Materials” set forth in Part I, “Item 1. Business” of this report. The prices of these ingredients, other raw materials, packaging materials, aluminum cans and other containers fluctuate depending on market conditions, governmental actions, climate change and other factors beyond our control, including the COVID-19 pandemic. Substantial increases in the prices of our or our bottling partners’ ingredients, other raw materials, packaging materials, aluminum cans and other containers, to the extent they cannot be recouped through increases in the prices of finished beverage products, could increase our and our bottling partners’ operating costs and reduce our profitability. Increases in the prices of our finished products resulting from a higher cost of ingredients, other raw materials, packaging materials, aluminum cans and other containers could affect affordability in some markets and reduce our or our bottling partners’ sales. In addition, some of our ingredients, such as aspartame, acesulfame potassium, and saccharin, as well as some packaging containers, such as aluminum cans, are available from a limited number of suppliers, and certain other ingredients are only available from one source. Furthermore, some of our suppliers are located in countries experiencing political or other risks. We and our bottling partners may not be able to maintain favorable arrangements and relationships with these suppliers, and our contingency plans may not be effective in preventing disruptions that may arise from shortages of any ingredients that are available from a limited number of suppliers or from only one source.
Adverse weather conditions may affect the supply of other agricultural commodities from which key ingredients for our products are derived. For example, drought conditions in certain parts of the United States or in other major corn-producing
13


areas of the world may negatively affect the supply of corn, which in turn may result in shortages of and higher prices for HFCS. The citrus industry is impacted by the variability of weather conditions and by greening disease, which affect the supply and quality of orange juice and orange juice concentrate, which are important raw materials for our business. In particular, freezing weather or hurricanes in central Florida may result in shortages and higher prices for orange juice and orange juice concentrate throughout the industry. In addition, greening disease is reducing the number of citrus trees and increasing grower costs and prices.
An increase in the cost, a sustained interruption in the supply, or a shortage of some of these ingredients, other raw materials, packaging materials, aluminum cans and other containers that may be caused by changes in or the enactment of new laws and regulations; a deterioration of our or our bottling partners’ relationships with suppliers; supplier quality and reliability issues; trade disruptions; changes in supply chain; and increases in tariffs; or events such as natural disasters, widespread outbreaks of infectious diseases (such as the COVID-19 pandemic), power outages, labor strikes, political uncertainties or governmental instability, or the like could negatively impact our net operating revenues operating incomeand profits.
We may not be able to increase prices to fully offset inflationary pressures on various costs, such as our costs for materials and labor, which may adversely impact our financial condition or results of operations.
In connection with our manufacturing and bottling operations, we are dependent upon, among other things, raw materials, packaging materials, plant labor and transportation providers. In 2021 and the valueearly part of balance sheet2022, the costs of raw materials, packaging materials, labor, energy, fuel, transportation and other inputs necessary for the production and distribution of our products have rapidly increased. In addition, many of these items denominated in foreign currencies. For information regarding the estimated impactare subject to price fluctuations from a number of factors, including, but not limited to, market conditions, geopolitical developments, demand for raw materials, weather, growing and harvesting conditions, climate change, energy costs, currency fluctuations, supplier capacities, governmental actions, import and export requirements (including tariffs), and other factors beyond our control. We expect the inflationary pressures on input and other costs to continue to impact our business in 2022.
Our attempts to offset these cost pressures, such as through price increases of some of our products, may not be successful. Higher product prices may result in reductions in sales volume. Consumers may be less willing to pay a price differential for our branded products and may increasingly purchase lower-priced offerings, or may forgo some purchases altogether. To the extent that price increases are not sufficient to offset higher costs adequately or in a timely manner, and/or if they result in significant decreases in sales volume, our financial condition or results of operations may be adversely affected. Furthermore, we may not be able to offset cost increases through productivity initiatives or through our commodity hedging activity.
If we do not successfully integrate and manage our acquired businesses, brands or bottling operations, our financial results could suffer.
We routinely evaluate opportunities to acquire businesses or brands to expand our beverage portfolio and capabilities. Additionally, from time to time, we have acquired or taken control of bottling operations, often in underperforming markets where we believe we can use our resources and expertise to improve performance. We may incur unforeseen liabilities and obligations in connection with acquiring businesses, brands or bottling operations. The expected benefits of business or brand acquisitions, including cost and growth synergies associated with such acquisitions, may take longer to realize than expected or may not be realized at all. Moreover, we may encounter challenges to successfully integrating the operations, technologies, services, products and systems of any acquired businesses in an effective, timely and cost-efficient manner. We may also encounter unexpected difficulties, costs or delays in restructuring and integrating acquired businesses, brands or bottling operations into our Company’s operating and internal control structures, including extending our Company’s internal control over financial reporting to newly acquired businesses, which may increase the risk of failure to prevent misstatements in their financial records and in our consolidated financial statements. In addition, our quality management program, which is designed to ensure product quality and operating segment net operating revenues for 2018 and 2017, refersafety, may not be sufficiently robust to effectively manage the heading "Operations Review — Net Operating Revenues" set forth in Part II, "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysisexpanded range of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" of this report. Because of the geographic diversity of our operations, weaknesses in some currenciesproduct offerings introduced through newly acquired businesses or brands, which may be offset by strengths in others over time. We also use derivative financial instruments to further reduce our net exposure to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. However, fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, particularly the strengthening of the U.S. dollar against major currencies or the currencies of large developing countries, could materially affect our financial results.
If interest rates increase our net incomecosts or subject us to negative publicity. Also, we may not be able to successfully manage the additional complexities involved with overseeing various supply chain models as we expand our product offerings. Our financial performance is impacted by how well we can integrate and manage acquired businesses, brands and bottling operations, and we may not be able to achieve our strategic and financial objectives for acquired businesses, brands or bottling operations. If we incur unforeseen liabilities or costs in connection with acquiring or integrating businesses, brands or bottling operations, experience internal control or product quality failures, or are unable to achieve our strategic and financial objectives for acquired businesses, brands or bottling operations, our consolidated results could be negatively affected.
We maintain levelsIf our third-party service providers and business partners do not satisfactorily fulfill their commitments and responsibilities, our financial results could suffer.
In the conduct of debt thatour business, we consider prudent basedrely on relationships with third parties, including cloud data storage and other information technology service providers, suppliers, distributors, contractors, joint venture partners and other external business partners, for certain functions or for services in support of key portions of our cash flows, interest coverage ratiooperations. These third-party service providers and percentagebusiness
14


partners are subject to similar risks as we are relating to cybersecurity, privacy violations, business interruption, and systems and employee failures, and are subject to legal, regulatory and market risks of debt to capital. We use debt financing to lowertheir own. Our third-party service providers and business partners may not fulfill their respective commitments and responsibilities in a timely manner and in accordance with the agreed-upon terms. In addition, while we have procedures in place for selecting and managing our cost of capital,relationships with third-party service providers and other business partners, we do not have control over their business operations or governance and compliance systems, practices and procedures, which increases our return on shareowners' equity. This exposes usfinancial, legal, reputational and operational risk. If we are unable to adverse changes in interest rates. Wheneffectively manage our third-party relationships, or for any reason our third-party service providers or business partners fail to satisfactorily fulfill their commitments and to the extent appropriate, we use derivative financial instruments to reduce our exposure to interest rate risks. However,responsibilities, our financial risk management programresults could suffer.
If we are unable to renew collective bargaining agreements on satisfactory terms, or if we or our bottling partners experience strikes, work stoppages or labor unrest, our business could suffer.
Many of our employees at our key manufacturing locations and bottling plants are covered by collective bargaining agreements. While we generally have been able to renegotiate collective bargaining agreements on satisfactory terms when they expire and regard our relations with employees and their representatives as generally satisfactory, negotiations may notnevertheless be successful in reducing the risks inherent in exposures to interest rate fluctuations. Our interest expense may also be affected by our credit ratings. In assessing our credit strength, credit rating agencies consider our capital structure and financial policies as wellchallenging, as the consolidated balance sheetCompany must have competitive cost structures in each market while meeting the compensation and other financial informationbenefits needs of the Company.our employees. If we are unable to renew collective bargaining agreements on satisfactory terms, our labor costs could increase, which could affect our profit margins. In addition, some credit rating agencies also consider financial informationmany of certainour bottling partners’ employees are represented by labor unions. Strikes, work stoppages or other forms of labor unrest at any of our major bottlers. Itmanufacturing facilities or at our bottling operations or our major bottlers’ plants could impair our ability to supply concentrates and syrups to our bottling partners or our bottlers’ ability to supply finished beverages to customers, which could reduce our net operating revenues and could expose us to customer claims. Furthermore, from time to time we and our bottling partners restructure manufacturing and other operations to improve productivity, which may have negative impacts on employee morale and work performance, result in escalation of grievances and adversely affect the negotiation of collective bargaining agreements. If these labor relations are not effectively managed at the local level, they could escalate in the form of corporate campaigns supported by the labor organizations and could negatively affect our Company’s overall reputation and brand image, which in turn could have a negative impact on our products’ acceptance by consumers.
RISKS RELATED TO CONSUMER DEMAND FOR OUR PRODUCTS
Obesity and other health-related concerns may reduce demand for some of our products.
There is growing concern among consumers, public health professionals and government agencies about the health problems associated with obesity. Increasing public concern about obesity; other health-related public concerns surrounding consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages; possible new or increased taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages by government entities to reduce consumption or to raise revenue; additional governmental regulations concerning the advertising, marketing, labeling, packaging or sale of our expectation thatsugar-sweetened beverages; and negative publicity resulting from actual or threatened legal actions against us or other companies in our industry relating to the credit rating agencies willmarketing, labeling or sale of sugar-sweetened beverages may reduce demand for, or increase the cost of, our sugar-sweetened beverages, which could adversely affect our profitability.
If we do not address evolving consumer product and shopping preferences, our business could suffer.
Consumer product preferences have evolved and continue using this methodology. If our credit ratings were to be downgradedevolve as a result of, among other things, health, wellness and nutrition considerations, including concerns regarding caloric intake associated with sugar-sweetened beverages and the perceived undesirability of artificial ingredients; shifting consumer demographics; changes in consumer tastes and needs coupled with a rapid expansion of beverage options and delivery methods; changes in consumer lifestyles; concerns regarding location of origin or source of ingredients and raw materials and the environmental, social and sustainability impact of ingredient sources and the product manufacturing process; consumer emphasis on transparency related to ingredients we use in our capital structure;products and collection and recyclability of, and amount of recycled content contained in, our packaging containers and other materials; concerns about the health and welfare of animals in our dairy supply chain; and competitive product and pricing pressures. In addition, in many of our markets, shopping patterns are being affected by the digital evolution, with consumers rapidly embracing shopping by way of mobile device applications, e-commerce retailers and e-commerce websites or platforms. If we fail to address changes in consumer product and shopping preferences, do not successfully anticipate and prepare for future changes in such preferences, or are ineffective or slow in developing and implementing appropriate digital transformation initiatives, our share of sales, revenue growth and overall financial results could be negatively affected.
Product safety and quality concerns could negatively affect our business.
Our success depends in large part on our ability to maintain consumer confidence in the safety and quality of all of our products. We have rigorous product safety and quality standards, which we expect our operations as well as our bottling partners to meet. However, despite our strong commitment to product safety and quality, we or our bottling partners periodically have not met, and may not always meet, these standards, particularly as we expand our product offerings through innovation or acquisitions into beverage categories, such as value-added dairy and plant-based beverages, that are beyond our
15


traditional range of beverage products. If we or our bottling partners fail to comply with applicable product safety and quality standards, or if our beverage products taken to the market are or become contaminated or adulterated by any means, we may be required to conduct costly product recalls and may become subject to product liability claims and negative publicity, which could cause our business to suffer.
Public debate and concern about perceived negative health consequences of certain ingredients, such as non-nutritive sweeteners and biotechnology-derived substances, and of other substances present in our beverage products or packaging materials, may reduce demand for our beverage products.
Public debate and concern about perceived negative health consequences of certain ingredients in our beverage products, such as synthetic colors, non-nutritive sweeteners and biotechnology-derived substances; substances that are present in our beverage products naturally or that occur as a result of the manufacturing process, such as 4-methylimidazole (“4-MEI”), a chemical compound that is formed during the manufacturing of certain types of caramel coloring used in cola-flavored beverages; or substances used in packaging materials, such as bisphenol A (“BPA”), an odorless, tasteless food-grade chemical commonly used in the food and beverage industries as a component in the coating of the interior of cans, may affect consumers’ preferences and cause them to shift away from some of our beverage products. In addition, increasing public concern about actual or perceived health consequences of the presence of such ingredients or substances in our beverage products or in packaging materials, whether or not justified, could result in additional governmental regulations concerning the advertising, marketing, labeling, packaging or sale of our beverages; possible new or increased taxes on our beverages by government entities; and negative publicity, or actual or threatened legal actions against us or other companies in our industry, all of which could damage the reputation of, and may reduce demand for, our beverage products.
If we are not successful in our efforts to digitize the Coca-Cola system, our financial results could be negatively affected.
The digital evolution is affecting how we interact with consumers, customers, suppliers, bottlers and other business partners and stakeholders. We believe that our future success will depend in part on our ability to adapt to and thrive in the digital environment. Therefore, one of our top priorities is to digitize the Coca-Cola system by, among other things, creating more relevant and more personalized experiences wherever our system interacts with consumers, whether in a digital environment or through digital devices in an otherwise physical environment; finding ways to create more powerful digital tools and capabilities for the Coca-Cola system’s retail customers to enable them to grow their businesses; and digitizing operations through the use of data, artificial intelligence, automation, robotics and digital devices to increase efficiency and productivity. If we are not successful in our efforts to digitize the Coca-Cola system, our ability to increase sales and reduce costs may be negatively affected and the cost and expenses we have incurred or may incur in connection with our digitization initiatives may adversely impact our financial performance.
If negative publicity, whether or not warranted, concerning product safety or quality, workplace and human rights, obesity or other issues damages our brand image, corporate reputation and social license to operate, our business may suffer.
Our success depends in large part on our ability to maintain the brand image of our existing products, build up the brand image for new products and brand extensions, and maintain our corporate reputation and social license to operate. However, our continuing investment in advertising and marketing and our strong commitment to product safety and quality and human rights have not always had, and may not in the future always have, the desired impact on our products’ brand image and on consumer preferences. Product safety or quality issues, actual or perceived, or allegations of product contamination, even when false or unfounded, could tarnish the image of the affected brands and may cause consumers to choose other products. In some emerging markets, the production and sale of counterfeit or “spurious” products, which we and our bottling partners may not be able to fully combat, may damage the image and reputation of our products. In addition, from time to time, we and our executives have engaged, and may in the future engage, in public policy endeavors that are either directly related to our products and packaging or to our business operations and the general economic climate affecting the Company. These engagements in public policy debates have been, and could in the future be, the subject of backlash from advocacy groups or others that have a differing point of view and could result in adverse media and consumer reaction, including product boycotts. Similarly, our sponsorship relationships have subjected us in the past, and could subject us in the future, to negative publicity as a result of actual or alleged misconduct by individuals, hosts or entities associated with organizations we sponsor or support financially or through in-kind contributions. Likewise, campaigns by activists connecting us, or our bottling system or supply chain, with workplace and human rights issues, whether actual or perceived, could adversely impact our corporate image and reputation. Additionally, negative postings or comments on social media or networking websites about the Company or one of its brands, even if inaccurate or malicious, have in the past, and could in the future, generate adverse publicity that could damage the reputation of our brands or the Company. Furthermore, the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, endorsed by the United Nations Human Rights Council, outline how businesses should implement the corporate responsibility to respect human rights principles included in the United Nations “Protect, Respect and Remedy” framework on human rights. Allegations, even if untrue, that we are not respecting one or more of the 30 human rights found in the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights; actual or perceived failure by our suppliers or other business partners to comply with applicable workplace and labor laws, including child labor laws, or their actual or perceived abuse or misuse of migrant
16


workers; and adverse publicity surrounding obesity and health concerns related to our products, water usage, environmental impact, labor relations or the like could negatively affect our Company’s overall reputation and brand image, which in turn could have a negative impact on our products’ acceptance by consumers. In addition, if we fail to protect our employees’ and our supply chain employees’ human rights, or inadvertently discriminate against any group of employees or hiring prospects, our ability to hire and retain the best talent will be diminished, which could have an adverse impact on our overall business.
Unfavorable general economic and political conditions could negatively impact our financial results.
Many of the jurisdictions in which our products are sold have experienced and could continue to experience unfavorable general economic conditions, such as a recession or economic slowdown, which could negatively affect the affordability of, and consumer demand for, our beverages. Under difficult economic conditions, consumers may seek to reduce discretionary spending by forgoing purchases of our products or by shifting away from our beverages to lower-priced products offered by other companies, including private-label brands, which could reduce our profitability and could negatively affect our overall financial performance.
Other financial uncertainties in our major bottlers'markets and unstable political conditions in certain markets, including civil unrest and governmental changes, could undermine global consumer confidence and reduce consumers’ purchasing power, thereby reducing demand for our products. Product boycotts resulting from political activism could reduce demand for our products, while restrictions on our ability to transfer earnings or capital across borders, price controls, limitations on profits, retaliatory tariffs, import authorization requirements and other restrictions on business activities which have been or may be imposed or expanded as a result of political and economic instability, deterioration of economic relations between countries or otherwise, could impact our profitability. In addition, U.S. trade sanctions against countries designated by the U.S. government as state sponsors of terrorism and/or financial performance; changesinstitutions accepting transactions for commerce within such countries could increase significantly, which could make it impossible for us to continue to make sales to bottlers in such countries. The imposition of retaliatory sanctions against U.S. multinational corporations by countries that are or may become subject to U.S. trade sanctions, or the delisting of our branded products by retailers in various countries in reaction to U.S. trade sanctions or other governmental action or policy, could also negatively affect our business.
If we are unable to successfully manage new product launches, our business and financial results could be adversely affected.
Due to the highly competitive nature of the commercial beverage industry, the Company continually introduces new products and evolves existing products to stimulate consumer demand. For instance, the Company has directly entered the ready-to-drink alcohol beverages segment in numerous markets outside the United States, and in the credit rating agencies' methodology in assessingUnited States, the Company has authorized alcohol-licensed third parties to use certain of its brands on ready-to-drink alcohol beverages. The success of new and evolved products depends on a number of factors, including timely and successful development and consumer acceptance. Such endeavors may also involve significant risks and uncertainties, including greater execution risks, higher costs, distraction of management from current operations, inadequate return on investments, increased competitive pressures, exposure to additional regulations and reliance on the performance of third parties. If we become subject to additional government regulations, including alcohol regulations related to licensing, trade and pricing practices, labeling, advertising, promotion and marketing practices, and relationships with distributors, we may become exposed to the risk of increased compliance costs and disruption to our credit strength; the credit agencies' perception of the impact of credit market conditions on our or our major bottlers' current or future financial performance and financial condition; or for any other reason, our cost of borrowing could increase. Additionally, if the credit ratings of certain bottlers in which we have equity method investments were to be downgraded, such bottlers' interest expense could increase, which would reduce our equity income.core business.
RISKS RELATED TO THE COCA-COLA SYSTEM
We rely on our bottling partners for a significant portion of our business. If we are unable to maintain good relationships with our bottling partners, our business could suffer.
We generate a significant portion of our net operating revenues by selling concentrates and syrups to independent bottling partners. As independent companies, our bottling partners, some of which are publicly traded companies, make their own business decisions that may not always align with our interests. In addition, manysome of our bottling partners have the right to manufacture or distribute their own products or certain products of other beverage companies. If we are unable to provide anmaintain operating and strategic alignment or agree on appropriate mix of incentives to our bottling partners through a combination of pricing and marketing and advertising support, or if our bottling partners are not satisfied with our brand innovation and development efforts, they may take actions that, while maximizing     their own short-term profits, may be detrimental to our Company or our brands, or they may devote more of their energy and resources         to business opportunities or products other than those of the Company. Such actions could, in the long run,term, have an adverse effect on our profitability.
If our bottling partners'partners’ financial condition deteriorates, our business and financial results could be affected.
WeIn the vast majority of our markets, our products are sold and distributed by independent bottling partners, and we therefore derive a significant portion of our net operating revenues from sales of concentrates and syrups to independent bottling partners and, therefore,partners. Accordingly, the success of our business depends in part on our bottling partners'partners’ financial strength and profitability. While under our agreements with our bottling partners we generally have the right to unilaterally change the prices we charge for our
17


concentrates and syrups, our ability to do so may be materially limited by our bottling partners'partners’ financial condition and their ability to pass price increases along to their customers. In addition, we have investments in certain of our bottling partners, which we account for under the equity method, and our operating results include our proportionate share of such bottling partners'partners’ income or loss. Our bottling partners'partners’ financial condition is affected in large part by conditions and events that are

beyond our and their control, including competitive and general market conditions in the territories in which they operate;conditions; the availability of capital and other financing resources on reasonable terms; loss of major customers; changes in or additional regulations; or disruptions of bottling operations that may be caused by strikes, work stoppages, labor unrest, natural disasters or other catastrophic events. A deterioration of the financial condition or results of operations of one or more of our major bottling partners could adversely affect our net operating revenues from sales of concentrates and syrups; and, if such deterioration involves one or more of our major equity method investee bottling partners, it could also result in a decrease in our equity income and/or impairments of our equity method investments.
We may from time to time engage in refranchising activities or divestitures of certain brands or businesses, which could adversely affect our business and results of operations.
As part of our strategic initiative to focus on our core business of building brands and leading our system of bottling partners, we continue to seek opportunities to refranchise our consolidated bottling operations. Our refranchising activities require significant attention and effort on the part of, and therefore may be a distraction for, senior management. If we are unable to complete future refranchising transactions on terms and conditions favorable to us, or if our refranchising partners are not efficient or not aligned with our long-term vision for the Coca-Cola system, our business and results of operations could be adversely affected. Additionally, we have divested and may in the future divest certain brands or businesses. These divestitures may adversely impact our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition if we are unable to offset impacts from the loss of revenue associated with the divested brands or businesses, or if we are otherwise unable to achieve the anticipated benefits or cost savings from such divestitures.
RISKS RELATED TO REGULATORY AND LEGAL MATTERS
Increases in income tax rates, changes in income tax laws, regulations or unfavorable resolutionresolutions of tax matters could have a material adverse impact on our financial results.
We are subject to income tax in the United States and numerous other jurisdictions in which we generate profits. Our overall effective income tax rate is a function of applicable local tax rates in the jurisdictions in which we operate, tax treaties between such jurisdictions, and the geographic mix of our income from continuing operations before income taxes, which is itself impacted by currency movements. Consequently, the isolated or combined effects of unfavorable movements in tax rates, geographic mix or foreign exchange rates could reduce our after-taxnet income.
Our annual Tax laws and regulations, including rates of taxation, are subject to revision by individual taxing jurisdictions which may result from multilateral agreements. Many jurisdictions have enacted legislation and adopted policies resulting from the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development’s (“OECD”) anti-Base Erosion and Profit Shifting project. The OECD is currently coordinating a project on behalf of the G20 and other participating countries which would grant additional taxing rights over profits earned by multinational enterprises to the countries in which their products are sold and services rendered. A second pillar would establish a global per-country minimum tax rateof 15 percent. It is basedpossible that the adoption of these or other proposals could have a material impact on our net income and the tax laws in the various jurisdictions in which we operate.cash flows. Significant judgment is required in determining our annual income tax expense and in evaluating our tax positions. Although we believe our tax estimates are reasonable, the final determination of tax audits and any related disputes could be materially different from our historical income tax provisions, estimates and accruals. The results of audits or related disputes could have a material adverse effect on our financial statements for the period or periods for which the applicable final determinations are made and for periods for which the statute of limitations is open.
For instance, the United States Internal Revenue Service ("IRS"(“IRS”) is seeking to increase our U.S. taxable income for tax years 2007 through 2009 by an amount that creates a potential additional U.S. federal income tax liability of approximately $3.3 billion for that period, plus interest. If this income tax disputeThe Company firmly believes that the IRS’ claims are without merit and is pursuing, and will continue to pursue, all available administrative and judicial remedies necessary to vigorously defend its position. On November 18, 2020, the U.S. Tax Court (“Tax Court”) issued an opinion (“Opinion”) predominantly siding with the IRS. Although the Company disagrees with the unfavorable portions of the Opinion and intends to vigorously defend its position, considering all avenues of appeal, there is no assurance that the courts will ultimately rule in the Company’s favor. It is therefore possible that all or some of the unfavorable portions of the Opinion could ultimately be upheld. In that event, the Company would be subject to significant additional liabilities for the years at issue and potentially also for the subsequent years if the unfavorable portions of the Opinion were to be ultimately determined adverselyapplied to us, anythe foreign licensees covered within the scope of the Opinion. Moreover, the IRS could successfully appeal the portions of the Opinion that are favorable to the Company and/or assert new claims for additional taxes, interest and potential penalties intax relating to the litigated or subsequent years by broadening the scope to cover additional foreign licensees. These adjustments could have a material adverse impact on the Company'sCompany’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows. Any such adjustments related to years prior to 2018, either in the litigation period or later,thereafter, may also have an impact on the
18


transition tax payable as part of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the "Tax(“Tax Reform Act"Act”). For additional information regarding this incomethe tax dispute,litigation, refer to Note 12 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statementsthe heading “Legal Proceedings” set forth in Part II, "Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data"I, “Item 3. Legal Proceedings” of this report.
The Tax Reform Act, which was signed into law on December 22, 2017, significantly affected U.S. income tax law by changing how the United States imposes income tax on multinational corporations. As permitted by Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 ("SAB 118"), we recorded an original provisional estimate of the effect of the Tax Reform Act in our 2017 consolidated financial statements and have subsequently finalized our accounting analysis based on the guidance, interpretations and data available as of December 31, 2018. For additional information regarding the Tax Reform Act and the final tax amounts recorded in our consolidated financial statements, refer to the heading "Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates — Income Taxes" set forth in Part II, "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" of this report.
Increased or new indirect taxes in the United States and throughout the world could negatively affect our business.
Our business operations are subject to numerous duties or taxes that are not based on income, sometimes referred to as "indirect“indirect taxes," including import duties, tariffs, excise taxes, sales or value-added taxes, taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages, packaging taxes, property taxes and payroll taxes, in many of the jurisdictions in which we operate, including indirect taxes imposed by state and local governments.operate. In addition, in the past, the U.S. Congress considered imposing a federal excise tax on beverages sweetened with sugar, HFCS or other nutritive sweeteners and may consider similar proposals in the future. As federal, state and local governments in the United States and throughout the world experience significant budget deficits, some lawmakers have singled out beverages among a plethora of revenue-raising items and have imposed or increased, or proposed to impose or increase, sales or similar taxes on beverages, particularly sugar-sweetened beverages. Increases in or the imposition of new indirect taxes on our business operations or products would increase the cost of products or, to the extent levied directly on consumers, make our products less affordable, which may negatively impact our net operating revenues and profitability.
If we do not realize the economic benefits we anticipate from our productivity and reinvestment program or are unable to successfully manage its possible negative consequences, our business operations could be adversely affected.
We believe that improved productivity is essential to achieving our long-term growth objectives and, therefore, a leading priority of our Company is to design and implement the most effective and efficient business model possible. For information regarding our productivity and reinvestment program, refer to Note 19 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements set forth in Part II, "Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" of this report. We have incurred, and we expect will continue to incur, significant costs and expenses in connection with our productivity and reinvestment program and associated initiatives. If we are unable to implement some or all of these productivity and reinvestment initiatives fully or in the envisioned timeframe, or we otherwise do not timely capture the efficiencies, cost savings and revenue growth opportunities we

anticipate from these initiatives, our results of operations for future periods could be negatively affected. In addition, some of the actions we are taking in furtherance of our productivity and reinvestment initiatives may become a distraction for our managers and employees and may disrupt our ongoing business operations; cause deterioration in employee morale which may make it more difficult for us to retain or attract qualified managers and employees; disrupt or weaken the internal control structures of the affected business operations; and give rise to negative publicity which could affect our corporate reputation. If we are unable to successfully manage the possible negative consequences of our productivity and reinvestment initiatives, our business operations could be adversely affected.
If we are unable to attract or retain a highly skilled and diverse workforce, our business could be negatively affected.
The success of our business depends on our ability to attract, train, develop and retain a highly skilled and diverse workforce. We may not be able to successfully compete for, attract and retain the high-quality and diverse employee talent we want and our future business needs may require, such as employees with e-commerce, social media and digital marketing and advertising skills and capabilities. Changes in immigration laws and policies could also make it more difficult for us to recruit or relocate highly skilled technical, professional and management personnel to meet our business needs. In addition, the unexpected loss of experienced and highly skilled associates due to insecurity resulting from our ongoing productivity initiatives, organizational changes and changes in compensation structure could deplete our institutional knowledge base and erode our competitiveness. Any of the foregoing could have a negative impact on our business.
Increase in the cost, disruption of supply or shortage of energy or fuel could affect our profitability.
Our Company-owned or -controlled bottlers operate a large fleet of trucks and other motor vehicles to distribute and deliver beverage products to customers. In addition, we use a significant amount of electricity, natural gas and other energy sources to operate our concentrate, syrup and juice production plants and the bottling plants and distribution facilities operated by our Company-owned or -controlled bottlers. An increase in the price, disruption of supply or shortage of fuel and other energy sources in countries in which we have concentrate plants, or in any of the major markets in which our Company-owned or -controlled bottlers operate, that may be caused by increasing demand or by events such as natural disasters, power outages, or the like could increase our operating costs and negatively impact our profitability.
Our independent bottling partners also operate large fleets of trucks and other motor vehicles to distribute and deliver beverage products to their own customers and use a significant amount of electricity, natural gas and other energy sources to operate their own bottling plants and distribution facilities. An increase in the price, disruption of supply or shortage of fuel and other energy sources in any of the major markets in which our independent bottling partners operate could increase the affected independent bottling partners' operating costs and thus indirectly negatively impact our results of operations.
Increase in the cost, disruption of supply or shortage of ingredients, other raw materials, packaging materials, aluminum cans and other containers could harm our business.
We and our bottling partners use various ingredients in our business, including HFCS, sucrose, aspartame, acesulfame potassium, sucralose, saccharin, cyclamate, steviol glycosides, ascorbic acid, citric acid, phosphoric acid, caffeine and caramel color; other raw materials such as orange and other fruit juice and juice concentrates; packaging materials such as PET, bio-based PET and recycled PET for bottles; and aluminum cans and other containers. For additional information regarding ingredients, other raw materials, packaging materials and containers we use in our business, refer to the heading "Raw Materials" set forth in Part I, "Item 1. Business" of this report. The prices for these ingredients, other raw materials, packaging materials, aluminum cans and other containers fluctuate depending on market conditions. Substantial increases in the prices of our or our bottling partners' ingredients, other raw materials, packaging materials, aluminum cans and other containers to the extent they cannot be recouped through increases in the prices of finished beverage products, could increase our and our bottling partners' operating costs and reduce our profitability. Increases in the prices of our finished products resulting from a higher cost of ingredients, other raw materials, packaging materials, aluminum cans and other containers could affect affordability in some markets and reduce Coca-Cola system sales. In addition, some of our ingredients, such as aspartame, acesulfame potassium, sucralose, saccharin and ascorbic acid, as well as some packaging containers, such as aluminum cans, are available from a limited number of suppliers, and certain other ingredients are available from only one source each. Furthermore, some of our suppliers are located in countries experiencing political or other risks. We and our bottling partners may not be able to maintain favorable arrangements and relationships with these suppliers, and our contingency plans may not be effective in preventing disruptions that may arise from shortages of any ingredient that is available from a limited number of suppliers or from only one source.
The citrus industry is impacted by the variability of weather conditions and by greening disease, which affect the supply of orange juice and orange juice concentrate, which are important raw materials for our business. In particular, freezing weather or hurricanes in central Florida may result in shortages and higher prices for orange juice and orange juice concentrate throughout the industry. In addition, greening disease is reducing the number of citrus trees and increasing grower costs and prices. Adverse weather conditions may affect the supply of other agricultural commodities from which key ingredients for our products are derived. For example, drought conditions in certain parts of the United States or in other major corn-producing

areas of the world may negatively affect the supply of corn, which in turn may result in shortages of and higher prices for HFCS.
An increase in the cost, a sustained interruption in the supply, or a shortage of some of these ingredients, other raw materials, packaging materials, aluminum cans and other containers that may be caused by a deterioration of our or our bottling partners' relationships with suppliers; by supplier quality and reliability issues; by trade disruptions, changes in supply chain and increases in tariffs that may be caused by the United Kingdom's impending withdrawal from the European Union, commonly referred to as "Brexit;" or by events such as natural disasters, power outages, labor strikes, political uncertainties or governmental instability, or the like could negatively impact our net operating revenues and profits.
Changes in laws and regulations relating to beverage containers and packaging could increase our costs and reduce demand for our products.
We and our bottlers currently offer, among other beverage containers, nonrefillable recyclable containers in the United States and in various other markets around the world. Legal requirements have been enacted in various jurisdictions in the United States and overseas requiring that deposits or certain ecotaxes or fees be charged in connection with the sale, marketing and use of certain beverage containers. Other proposals relating to beverage container deposits, recycling, recycling content, tethered bottle caps, ecotax and/or product stewardship, or even prohibitions on certain types of plastic products, packages and cups, have been introduced and/or adopted in various jurisdictions, in the United States and overseas, and we anticipate that similar legislation or regulations may be proposed in the future at local,federal, state and federallocal levels, both in the United States and elsewhere. Consumers'Consumers’ increased concerns and changing attitudes about solid waste streams and environmental responsibility and the related publicity could result in the adoption of additional such legislation or regulations.regulations in the future. If these types of requirements are adopted and implemented on a large scale, in any of the major markets in which we operate, they could affect our costs or require changes in our distribution model, which could reduce our net operating revenues and profitability.
Significant additional labeling or warning requirements or limitations on the marketing or sale of our products may inhibit sales of affected products.
Various jurisdictions have adopted and may seek to adopt significant additional product labeling or warning requirements or limitations on the marketing or sale of our products as a result of what they contain or allegations that they cause adverse health effects. If these types of requirements become applicable to one or more of our major products under current or future environmental or health laws or regulations, they may inhibit sales of such products.
For example, under one such law in California, known as Proposition 65, if the state has determined that a substance causes cancer or harms human reproduction or development, a warning must be provided for any product sold in the state that exposes consumers to that substance, unless the exposure falls under an established safe harbor level.level or another exemption is applicable. For additional information regarding Proposition 65, refer to the heading "Governmental Regulation"“Governmental Regulation” set forth in Part I, "Item“Item 1. Business"Business” of this report. If we were required to add Proposition 65 warnings on the labels of one or more of our beverage products produced for sale in California, the resulting consumer reaction to the warnings and possible adverse publicity could negatively affect our sales both in California and in other markets.
Unfavorable general economic conditions in the United States could negatively impact our financial performance.
In 2018, our net operating revenues in the United States were $11.3 billion, or 36 percent, of our total net operating revenues. Unfavorable general economic conditions, such as a recession or economic slowdown, in the United States could negatively affect the affordability of, and consumer demand for, our beverages in our flagship market. Under difficult economic conditions, consumers may seek to reduce discretionary spending by forgoing purchases of our products or by shifting away from our beverages to lower-priced products offered by other companies, including private label brands. Softer consumer demand for our beverages in the United States could reduce our profitability and could negatively affect our overall financial performance.
Unfavorable economic and political conditions in international markets could hurt our business.
We derive a significant portion of our net operating revenues from sales of our products in international markets. In 2018, our operations outside the United States accounted for $20.5 billion, or 64 percent, of our total net operating revenues. Unfavorable economic conditions and financial uncertainties in our major international markets, including uncertainties surrounding Brexit, and unstable political conditions, including civil unrest and governmental changes, in certain of our other international markets could undermine global consumer confidence and reduce consumers' purchasing power, thereby reducing demand for our products. Product boycotts resulting from political activism could reduce demand for our products, while restrictions on our ability to transfer earnings or capital across borders, price controls, limitation on profits, retaliatory tariffs, import authorization requirements and other restrictions on business activities which have been or may be imposed or expanded as a result of political and economic instability, deterioration of economic relations between countries or otherwise, could impact our profitability. In addition, U.S. trade sanctions against countries designated by the U.S. government as state sponsors of terrorism and/or financial institutions accepting transactions for commerce within such countries could increase significantly, which could make it impossible for us to continue to make sales to bottlers in such countries. The imposition of retaliatory

sanctions against U.S. multinational corporations by countries that are or may become subject to U.S. trade sanctions, or the delisting of our branded products by retailers in various countries in reaction to U.S. trade sanctions or other governmental action or policy, could also negatively affect our business.
Litigation or legal proceedings could expose us to significant liabilities and damage our reputation.
We are party to various litigation claims and legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business, including, but not limited to, litigation claims and legal proceedingsthose arising out of our advertising and marketing practices, product claims and labels, intellectual property and commercial disputes, tax disputes, and environmental and employment matters. We evaluate these litigation claims and legal proceedings to assess the likelihood of unfavorable outcomes and to estimate, if possible, the amount of potential losses. Based on these assessments and estimates, we establish reserves and/or disclose the relevant litigation claims or legal proceedings, as appropriate. These assessments and estimates are based on the information available to management at the time and involve a significant amount of management judgment. Actual outcomes or losses may differ materially from our current assessments and estimates.
We conduct business in markets with high-risk legal compliance environments, which exposes us to increased legal and reputational risk.
We have bottling and other business operations in markets with high-risk legal compliance environments. Our policies and procedures require strict compliance by our associatesemployees and agents with all United States and local laws and regulations and consent orders applicable to our business operations, including those prohibiting improper payments to government officials. Nonetheless, our policies, procedures and related training programs may not always ensure full compliance by our associates employees
19


and agents with all applicable legal requirements. Improper conduct by our associatesemployees or agents could damage our reputation in the United States and internationally or lead to litigation or legal proceedings that could result in civil or criminal penalties, including substantial monetary fines as well as disgorgement of profits.
If our third-party service providers and business partners do not satisfactorily fulfill their commitments and responsibilities, our financial results could suffer.
In the conduct of our business, we rely on relationships with third parties, including cloud data storage and other information technology service providers, suppliers, distributors, contractors, joint venture partners and other external business partners, for certain functions or for services in support of key portions of our operations. These third-party service providers and business partners are subject to similar risks as we are relating to cybersecurity, privacy violations, business interruption, and systems and employee failures, and are subject to legal, regulatory and market risks of their own. Our third-party service providers and business partners may not fulfill their respective commitments and responsibilities in a timely manner and in accordance with the agreed upon terms. In addition, while we have procedures in place for selecting and managing our relationships with third-party service providers and other business partners, we do not have control over their business operations or governance and compliance systems, practices and procedures, which increases our financial, legal, reputational and operational risk. If we are unable to effectively manage our third-party relationships, or for any reason our third-party service providers or business partners fail to satisfactorily fulfill their commitments and responsibilities, our financial results could suffer.
Failure to adequately protect, or disputes relating to, trademarks, formulaeformulas and other intellectual property rights could harm our business.
Our trademarks, formulaeformulas and other intellectual property rights (refer to the heading "Patents,“Patents, Copyrights, Trade Secrets and Trademarks"Trademarks” in Part I, "Item“Item 1. Business"Business” of this report) are essential to the success of our business. We cannot be certain that the legal steps we are taking around the world are sufficient to protect our intellectual property rights or that, notwithstanding legal protection, others do not or will not infringe or misappropriate our intellectual property rights. If we fail to adequately protect our intellectual property rights, or if changes in laws diminish or remove the current legal protections available to them, the competitiveness of our products may be eroded and our business could suffer. In addition, we could come into conflict with third parties over intellectual property rights, which could result in disruptive and expensive litigation. Any of the foregoing could harm our business.
Adverse weather conditions could reduce the demand for our products.
The sales of our products are influenced to some extent by weather conditions in the markets in which we operate. Unusually cold or rainy weather during the summer months may have a temporary effect on the demand for our products and contribute to lower sales, which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations for such periods.
Climate change may have a long-term adverse impact on our business and results of operations.
There is increasing concern that a gradual increase in global average temperatures due to increased concentration of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases in the atmosphere will cause significant changes in weather patterns around the globe and an increase in the frequency and severity of natural disasters. Decreased agricultural productivity in certain regions of the world as a result of changing weather patterns may limit the availability or increase the cost of key agricultural commodities, such as

sugarcane, corn, sugar beets, citrus, coffee and tea, which are important sources of ingredients for our products, and could impact the food security of communities around the world. Climate change may also exacerbate water scarcity and cause a further deterioration of water quality in affected regions, which could limit water availability for the Coca-Cola system's bottling operations. Increased frequency or duration of extreme weather conditions could also impair production capabilities, disrupt our supply chain or impact demand for our products. As a result, the effects of climate change could have a long-term adverse impact on our business and results of operations.
If negative publicity, whether or not warranted, concerning product safety or quality, human and workplace rights, obesity or other issues damages our brand image, corporate reputation and social license to operate, our business may suffer.
Our success depends in large part on our ability to maintain the brand image of our existing products, build up brand image for new products and brand extensions, and maintain our corporate reputation and social license to operate. However, our continuing investment in advertising and marketing and our strong commitment to product safety and quality and human rights may not have the desired impact on our products' brand image and on consumer preferences. Product safety or quality issues, actual or perceived, or allegations of product contamination, even when false or unfounded, could tarnish the image of the affected brands and may cause consumers to choose other products. In some emerging markets, the production and sale of counterfeit or "spurious" products, which we and our bottling partners may not be able to fully combat, may damage the image and reputation of our products. In addition, from time to time, we and our executives engage in public policy endeavors that are either directly related to our products and packaging or to our business operations and the general economic climate affecting the Company. These engagements in public policy debates can occasionally be the subject of backlash from advocacy groups that have a differing point of view and could result in adverse media and consumer reaction, including product boycotts. Similarly, our sponsorship relationships could subject us to negative publicity as a result of actual or alleged misconduct by individuals or entities associated with organizations we sponsor or support financially or through in-kind contributions. Likewise, campaigns by activists connecting us, or our bottling system or supply chain, with human and workplace rights issues, whether actual or perceived, could adversely impact our corporate image and reputation. Additionally, negative postings or comments on social media or networking websites about the Company or one of its brands, even if inaccurate or malicious, could generate adverse publicity that could damage the reputation of our brands or the Company. Furthermore, in June 2011, the United Nations Human Rights Council endorsed the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, which outlines how businesses should implement the corporate responsibility to respect human rights principles included in the United Nations "Protect, Respect and Remedy" framework on human rights. Through our Human Rights Policy, Code of Business Conduct and Supplier Guiding Principles, and our participation in the United Nations Global Compact, as well as our active participation in the Global Business Initiative on Human Rights, we made a number of commitments to respect all human rights. Allegations, even if untrue, that we are not respecting one or more of the 30 human rights found in the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights; actual or perceived failure by our suppliers or other business partners to comply with applicable labor and workplace rights laws, including child labor laws, or their actual or perceived abuse or misuse of migrant workers; and adverse publicity surrounding obesity and health concerns related to our products, water usage, environmental impact, labor relations or the like could negatively affect our Company's overall reputation and brand image, which in turn could have a negative impact on our products' acceptance by consumers. In addition, if we fail to protect our associates' and our supply chain employees' human rights, or inadvertently discriminate against any group of associates or hiring prospects, our ability to hire and retain the best talent will be diminished, which could have an adverse impact on our overall business.
Changes in, or failure to comply with, the laws and regulations applicable to our products or our business operations could increase our costs or reduce our net operating revenues.
Our Company's businessCompany is subject to various laws and regulations in the numerous countries throughout the world in which we do business, including laws and regulations relating to competition, product safety, advertising and labeling, container deposits, recycling and product stewardship, the protection of the environment, occupational health and safety, employment and labor practices.practices, personal data protection and privacy, and data security. For additional information regarding laws and regulations applicable to our business, refer to the heading "Governmental Regulation"“Governmental Regulation” set forth in Part I, "Item“Item 1. Business"Business” of this report. Changes in applicable laws or regulations or evolving interpretations thereof, including increased or additional regulations to limit carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas emissions as a result of concern over climate change,change; to discourage the use of plastic materials, including regulations relating to recovery and/or disposal of plastic bottles and other packaging materials due to environmental concerns,concerns; or to limit or impose additional costs on commercial water use due to local water scarcity concerns, may result in increased compliance costs, capital expenditures and other financial obligations for us and our bottling partners, which could affect our profitability, or may impede the production, distribution, marketing and sale of our products, which could affect our net operating revenues. In addition, failure to comply with environmental, health or safety requirements, privacyvarious laws and regulations, such as U.S. trade sanctions, the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the Office of Foreign Assets Control trade sanction regulations and anti-boycott regulations, antitrust and competition laws, anti-modern slavery laws, anti-bribery and anti-corruption laws, data privacy laws, including the European Union General Data Protection Regulation, tax laws and regulations and a variety of other applicable local, national and multinational regulations and laws or regulations could result in litigation, the assessment of damages, the imposition of penalties, suspension of production or distribution, costly changes to equipment or processes due to required corrective action, or a cessation or interruption of operations at our or our bottling partners'partners’ facilities, as well as damage to our or our bottling partners'partners’ image and reputation, all of which could harm our or our bottling partners'partners’ profitability.

RISKS RELATED TO FINANCE, ACCOUNTING AND INVESTMENTS
ChangesFluctuations in accounting standardsforeign currency exchange rates could have a material adverse effect on our financial results.
We earn revenues, pay expenses, own assets and incur liabilities in countries using many currencies other than the U.S. dollar. In 2021, we used 70 functional currencies in addition to the U.S. dollar and derived $25.6 billion of net operating revenues from operations outside the United States. Because our consolidated financial statements are presented in U.S. dollars, we must translate revenues, income and expenses, as well as assets and liabilities, into U.S. dollars at exchange rates in effect during or at the end of each reporting period. Therefore, increases or decreases in the value of the U.S. dollar against other currencies affect our reportednet operating revenues, operating income and the value of balance sheet items denominated in foreign currencies. Because of the geographic diversity of our operations, weakness in some currencies may be offset by strength in others over time. We also use derivative financial instruments to further reduce our net exposure to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. However, fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, particularly the strengthening of the U.S. dollar against major currencies or the currencies of large developing countries, could materially affect our financial results.
New accounting standardsIf interest rates increase, our net income could be negatively affected.
We maintain levels of debt that we consider prudent based on our cash flows, interest coverage ratio and percentage of debt to capital. We use debt financing to lower our cost of capital, which increases our return on shareowners’ equity. This exposes us to adverse changes in interest rates. When and to the extent appropriate, we use derivative financial instruments to reduce our exposure to interest rate risks. However, our financial risk management program may not be successful in reducing the risks inherent in exposures to interest rate fluctuations. On December 31, 2021, the United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority, the governing body responsible for regulating the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”), ceased to publish certain LIBOR reference rates. However, other LIBOR reference rates, including U.S. dollar overnight, 1-month, 3-month, 6-month and
20


12-month maturities, will continue to be published through June 2023. In preparation for the discontinuation of LIBOR, we have amended, or pronouncementswill amend, our LIBOR-referencing agreements to either reference the Secured Overnight Financing Rate or include mechanics for selecting an alternative rate, but it is possible that these changes may become applicablehave an adverse impact on our financing costs as compared to LIBOR in the long term. Our interest expense may also be affected by our Company from timecredit ratings. In assessing our credit strength, credit rating agencies consider our capital structure and financial policies as well as the consolidated balance sheet and other financial information of the Company. In addition, some credit rating agencies also consider financial information of certain of our major bottling partners. It is our expectation that the credit rating agencies will continue using this methodology. If our credit ratings were to time, orbe downgraded as a result of changes in our capital structure; our major bottling partners’ financial performance; changes in the interpretationcredit rating agencies’ methodology in assessing our credit strength; the credit agencies’ perception of existing standards and pronouncements, could have a significant effectthe impact of credit market conditions on our reportedor our major bottling partners’ current or future financial resultsperformance and financial condition; or for any other reason, our cost of borrowing could increase. Additionally, if the affected periods.credit ratings of certain bottling partners in which we have equity method investments were to be downgraded, such bottling partners’ interest expense could increase, which would reduce our equity income.
If we are not ableunable to achieve our overall long-term growth objectives, the value of an investment in our Company could be negatively affected.
We have established and publicly announced certain long-term growth objectives. These objectives wereare based on, among other things, our evaluation of our growth prospects, which are generally driven by the sales potential of our many beverage products, some of which are more profitable than others, and on an assessment of the potential price and product mix. There canWe may not be no assurance that we willable to realize the sales potential and the price and product mix necessary to achieve our long-term growth objectives.
If global credit market conditions deteriorate, our financial performance could be adversely affected.
The cost and availability of credit vary by market and are subject to changes in the global or regional economic environment. If conditions in major credit markets deteriorate, our and our bottling partners' ability to obtain debt financing on favorable terms may be negatively affected, which could affect our and our bottling partners' profitability as well as our share of the income of bottling partners in which we have equity method investments. A decrease in availability of consumer credit resulting from unfavorable credit market conditions, as well as general unfavorable economic conditions, may also cause consumers to reduce their discretionary spending, which could reduce the demand for our beverages and negatively affect our and our bottling partners' financial performance.
Default by or failure of one or more of our counterparty financial institutions could cause us to incur significant losses.
As part of our hedging activities, we enter into transactions involving derivative financial instruments, including forward contracts, commodity futures contracts, option contracts, collars and swaps, with various financial institutions. In addition, we have significant amounts of cash, cash equivalents and other investments on deposit or in accounts with banks or other financial institutions in the United States and abroad. As a result, we are exposed to the risk of default by or failure of counterparty financial institutions. The risk of counterparty default or failure may be heightened during economic downturns and periods of uncertainty in the financial markets. If one of our counterparties were to become insolvent or file for bankruptcy, our ability to recover losses incurred as a result of default or to retrieve our assets that are deposited or held in accounts with such counterparty may be limited by the counterparty'scounterparty’s liquidity or the applicable laws governing the insolvency or bankruptcy proceedings. In the event of default by or failure of one or more of our counterparties, we could incur significant losses, which could negatively impact our results of operations and financial condition.
If we are unable to renew collective bargaining agreements on satisfactory terms, or we or our bottling partners experience strikes, work stoppages or labor unrest, our business could suffer.
Many of our associates at our key manufacturing locations and bottling plants are covered by collective bargaining agreements. While we generally have been able to renegotiate collective bargaining agreements on satisfactory terms when they expire and regard our relations with associates and their representatives as generally satisfactory, negotiations may nevertheless be challenging, as the Company must have competitive cost structures in each market while meeting the compensation and benefits needs of our associates. If we are unable to renew collective bargaining agreements on satisfactory terms, our labor costs could increase, which could affect our profit margins. In addition, many of our bottling partners' employees are represented by labor unions. Strikes, work stoppages or other forms of labor unrest at any of our major manufacturing facilities or at our bottling operations' or our major bottlers' plants could impair our ability to supply concentrates and syrups to our bottling partners or our bottlers' ability to supply finished beverages to customers, which could reduce our net operating revenues and could expose us to customer claims. Furthermore, from time to time we and our bottling partners restructure manufacturing and other operations to improve productivity. Restructuring activities and the announcement of plans for future restructuring activities may result in a general increase in insecurity among some Company associates and some employees in other parts of the Coca-Cola system, which may have negative impacts on employee morale, work performance, escalation of grievances and the negotiation of collective bargaining agreements. If these labor relations are not effectively managed at the local level, they could escalate in the form of corporate campaigns supported by the labor organizations and could negatively affect our Company's overall reputation and brand image, which in turn could have a negative impact on our products' acceptance by consumers.
We may be required to recognize impairment charges that could materially affect our financial results.
We assess our noncurrent assets, including trademarks, bottler franchise rights, goodwill and other intangible assets, equity method investments and other long-lived assets, as and when required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States to determine whether they are impaired and, if they are, we record appropriate impairment charges. Our equity

method investees also perform similar recoverability and impairment tests, and we record our proportionate share of impairment charges recorded by them adjusted, as appropriate, for the impact of items such as basis differences, deferred taxes and deferred gains. It is possible that we may be required to record significant impairment charges or our proportionate share of significant impairment charges recorded by equity method investees in the future and, if we do so, our net income could be materially adversely affected.
We may incur multi-employer pension plan withdrawal liabilities in the future, which could negatively impact our financial performance.
We currently participate, and have in the past participated, in certain multi-employer pension plans in the United States. The U.S. multi-employer pension plans in which we currently participate have contractual arrangements that extend into 2021. If in the future we choose to withdraw, or are deemed to have withdrawn, from any of the multi-employer pension plans in which we currently participate, or in which we have participated in the past, we would need to record the appropriate withdrawal liabilities, which could negatively impact our financial performance in the applicable periods.
If we do not successfully integrate and manage our Company-owned or -controlled bottling operations or other acquired businesses or brands, our results could suffer.
From time to time we acquire or take control of bottling operations, often in underperforming markets where we believe we can use our resources and expertise to improve performance. In addition, we routinely evaluate opportunities to acquire other businesses or brands to expand our beverage portfolio and capabilities. We may incur unforeseen liabilities and obligations in connection with acquiring, taking control of or managing acquired bottling operations, other businesses or brands and may encounter unexpected difficulties and costs in restructuring and integrating them into our Company's operating and internal control structures. We may also experience delays in extending our Company's internal control over financial reporting to newly acquired or controlled bottling operations or other newly acquired businesses, which may increase the risk of failure to prevent misstatements in their financial records and in our consolidated financial statements. Our financial performance depends in large part on how well we can manage and improve the performance of Company-owned or -controlled bottling operations and other acquired businesses or brands. However, we may not be able to achieve our strategic and financial objectives for such bottling operations or other acquisitions. If we are unable to achieve such objectives, our consolidated results could be negatively affected.
If we do not successfully manage our refranchising activities, our business and results of operations could be adversely affected.
As part of our strategic initiative to refocus on our core business of building brands and leading our system of bottling partners, we continue to seek opportunities to refranchise Company-owned or -controlled bottling operations. Our refranchising activities require significant attention and effort on the part of, and therefore may be a distraction for, senior management. If we are unable to complete future refranchising transactions on our expected timetable and on terms and conditions favorable to us; our refranchising partners are not efficient and aligned with our long-term vision for the Coca-Cola system; or we are unable to maintain good relationships with the refranchised bottling operations, our business and results of operations could be adversely affected.
If we fail to realize a significant portion of the anticipated benefits of our strategic relationship with Monster, our financial performanceresults could be adversely affected.
In June 2015, we and Monster entered intoWe have a long-term strategic relationship in the global energy drink category.category with Monster. If we are unable to successfully manage our complex relationship with Monster, or if for any other reason we fail to realize all or a significant part of the benefits we expect from this strategic relationship and the related investment, our financial performance could be adversely affected.
GlobalRISKS RELATED TO INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND DATA PRIVACY
If we are unable to protect our information systems against service interruption, misappropriation of data or regional catastrophic events could impactcybersecurity incidents, our operations could be disrupted, we may suffer financial losses and our reputation may be damaged.
We rely on networks and information systems and other technology (“information systems”), including the Internet and third-party hosted services, to support a variety of business processes and activities, including procurement and supply chain, manufacturing, distribution, invoicing and collection of payments, employee processes, consumer marketing, mergers and acquisitions, and research and development. We use information systems to process financial results.information and results of operations for internal reporting purposes and to comply with regulatory financial reporting and legal and tax requirements. In addition, we depend on information systems for digital marketing activities and electronic communications among our locations around the world and between Company employees and our bottlers and other customers, suppliers and consumers. Because
Because
21


information systems are critical to many of the Company’s operating activities, our business may be impacted by system shutdowns, service disruptions or cybersecurity incidents. These incidents may be caused by failures during routine operations such as system upgrades or by user errors, as well as network or hardware failures, malicious or disruptive software, unintentional or malicious actions of employees or contractors, cyberattacks by hackers, criminal groups or nation-state organizations (which may include social engineering, business email compromise, cyber extortion, denial of service, or attempts to exploit vulnerabilities), geopolitical events, natural disasters, failures or impairments of telecommunications networks, or other catastrophic events. In addition, such incidents could result in unauthorized or accidental disclosure of material confidential information or regulated personal data. If our information systems or third-party information systems on which we rely suffer severe damage, disruption or shutdown and our business continuity plans do not effectively resolve the issues in a timely manner, we could experience delays in reporting our financial results, and we may lose revenue and profits as a result of our global presenceinability to timely manufacture, distribute, invoice and worldwide operations,collect payments for concentrates or finished products. Unauthorized or accidental access to, or destruction, loss, alteration, disclosure, falsification or unavailability of, information could result in violations of data protection laws and regulations, damage to the reputation and credibility of the Company, loss of opportunities to acquire or divest of businesses or brands, and loss of ability to commercialize products developed through research and development efforts and, therefore, could have a negative impact on net operating revenues. In addition, we may suffer financial and reputational damage because of lost or misappropriated confidential information belonging to us, our current or former employees, our bottling partners, other customers or suppliers, or consumers or other data subjects, and may become exposed to legal action and increased regulatory oversight, including governmental investigations, enforcement actions and regulatory fines. The Company could also be required to spend significant financial and other resources to remedy the damage caused by a security breach or to repair or replace networks and information systems. These risks also may be present to the extent any of our bottling partners, distributors, joint venture partners or suppliers using separate information systems, not integrated with the information systems of the Company, suffers a cybersecurity incident and could result in increased costs related to involvement in investigations or notifications conducted by these third parties. These risks may also be present to the extent a business we have acquired, but which does not use our information systems, experiences a system shutdown, service disruption, or cybersecurity incident.
Like most major corporations, the Company’s information systems are a target of attacks. In addition, third-party providers of data hosting or cloud services, as well as our bottling partners, distributors, joint venture partners, suppliers or acquired businesses that use separate information systems, may experience cybersecurity incidents that may involve data we share with them. Although the incidents that we have experienced to date, as well as those reported to us by our third-party partners, have not had a material effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations, such incidents could have a material adverse effect on us in the future. In order to address risks to our information systems, we continue to make investments in personnel, technologies and training. Data protection laws and regulations around the world often require “reasonable,” “appropriate” or “adequate” technical and organizational security measures, and the interpretation and application of those laws and regulations are often uncertain and evolving; there can be no assurance that our security measures will be deemed adequate, appropriate or reasonable by a regulator or court. Moreover, even security measures that are deemed appropriate, reasonable or in accordance with applicable legal requirements may not be able to protect the information we maintain. In addition to potential fines, we could be affectedsubject to mandatory corrective action due to a cybersecurity incident, which could adversely affect our business operations and result in substantial costs for years to come. The Company maintains an information risk management program which is supervised by large-scale terrorist acts, cyber-strikesinformation technology management and radiological attacks, especially those directedreviewed by a cross-functional committee. As part of this program, reports that include analysis of emerging risks, as well as the Company’s plans and strategies to address them, are regularly presented to senior management and the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. While we have purchased cybersecurity insurance, there are no assurances that the coverage would be adequate in relation to any incurred losses. Moreover, as cyberattacks increase in frequency and magnitude, we may be unable to obtain cybersecurity insurance in amounts and on terms we view as appropriate for our operations.
If we fail to comply with personal data protection and privacy laws, we could be subject to adverse publicity, government enforcement actions and/or private litigation, which could negatively affect our business and operating results.
In the ordinary course of our business, we receive, process, transmit and store information relating to identifiable individuals (“personal data”), primarily employees, former employees and consumers with whom we interact. As a result, we are subject to various U.S. federal and state and foreign laws and regulations relating to personal data. These laws have been subject to frequent changes, and new legislation in this area may be enacted in other jurisdictions at any time. These laws impose operational requirements for companies receiving or processing personal data, and many provide for significant penalties for noncompliance. Some laws and regulations also impose obligations regarding cross-border data transfers of personal data. These requirements with respect to personal data have subjected and may continue in the future to subject the Company to, among other things, additional costs and expenses and have required and may in the future require costly changes to our business practices and information security systems, policies, procedures and practices. In addition, some countries are considering or have enacted data localization laws requiring that certain data in their country be maintained, stored and/or processed in their country. Maintaining local data centers in individual countries could increase our operating costs
22


significantly. Our security controls over personal data, the training of employees and vendors on data privacy and data security, and the policies, procedures and practices we implemented or may implement in the future may not prevent the improper disclosure of personal data by us or the third-party service providers and vendors whose technology, systems and services we use in connection with the receipt, storage and transmission of personal data. Unauthorized access to or improper disclosure of personal data in violation of personal data protection or privacy laws could harm our reputation, cause loss of consumer confidence, subject us to regulatory enforcement actions (including penalties, fines and investigations), and result in private litigation against us, which could result in loss of revenue, increased costs, liability for monetary damages, fines and/or criminal prosecution, all of which could negatively affect our business and operating results. We have incurred, and will continue to incur, expenses to comply with privacy and data protection standards and protocols imposed by law, regulation, industry standards and contractual obligations. Increased regulation of data collection, use, and retention practices, including self-regulation and industry standards, changes in existing laws and regulations, enactment of new laws and regulations, increased enforcement activity, and changes in interpretation of laws, could increase our cost of compliance and operation, limit our ability to grow our business or otherwise harm our business.
RISKS RELATED TO ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL FACTORS
Our ability to achieve our environmental, social and governance goals are subject to risks, many of which are outside of our control, and our reputation and brands could be harmed if we fail to meet such goals.
Companies across all industries are facing increasing scrutiny from stakeholders related to environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) matters, including practices and disclosures related to environmental stewardship; social responsibility; diversity, equity and inclusion; and workplace rights. Our ability to achieve our ESG goals and objectives and to accurately and transparently report our progress presents numerous operational, financial, legal and other risks, and are dependent on the actions of our bottling partners, suppliers and other third parties, all of which are outside of our control. If we are unable to meet our ESG goals or evolving stakeholder expectations and industry standards, or if we are perceived to have not responded appropriately to the growing concern for ESG issues, our reputation, and therefore our ability to sell products, could be negatively impacted. In addition, in recent years, investor advocacy groups and certain institutional investors have placed increasing importance on ESG matters. If, as a result of their assessment of our ESG practices, certain investors are unsatisfied with our actions or progress, they may reconsider their investment in our Company.
As the nature, scope and complexity of ESG reporting, diligence and disclosure requirements expand, we may have to undertake additional costs to control, assess and report on ESG metrics. Any failure or perceived failure, whether or not valid, to pursue or fulfill our ESG goals, targets and objectives or to satisfy various ESG reporting standards within the timelines we announce, or at all, could increase the risk of litigation.
Increasing concerns about the environmental impact of plastic bottles and other packaging materials could result in reduced demand for our beverage products and increased production and distribution costs.
There are increasing concerns among consumers, governments and other stakeholders about the damaging impact of the accumulation of plastic bottles and other packaging materials in the environment, particularly in the world’s waterways, lakes and oceans, as well as inefficient use of resources when packaging materials are not included in a circular economy. We and our bottling partners sell certain of our beverage products in plastic bottles and use other packaging materials that, while largely recyclable, may not be regularly recovered and recycled due to low economic value or lack of collection and recycling infrastructure. If we and our bottling partners do not, or are perceived not to, act responsibly to address plastic materials recoverability and recycling concerns, our corporate image and brand reputation could be damaged, which may cause some consumers to reduce or discontinue consumption of some of our beverage products. In addition, from time to time we establish and publicly announce goals and commitments to reduce the Coca-Cola system’s impact on the environment by increasing our use of recycled content in our packaging materials; increasing our use of packaging materials that are made in part of plant-based renewable materials; expanding our use of reusable packaging (including refillable or returnable glass and plastic bottles, as well as dispensed and fountain delivery models where consumers use refillable containers for our beverages); participating in programs and initiatives to reclaim or recover plastic bottles and other packaging materials that are already in the environment; and taking other actions and participating in other programs and initiatives organized or sponsored by nongovernmental organizations and other groups. If we and our bottling partners fail to achieve or improperly report on our progress toward achieving our announced environmental goals and commitments, the resulting negative publicity could adversely affect consumer preference for our products. In addition, in response to environmental concerns, governmental entities in the United States and in many other jurisdictions around the world have adopted, or are considering adopting, regulations and policies designed to mandate or encourage plastic packaging waste reduction and an increase in recycling rates and/or recycled content minimums, or, in some cases, restrict or even prohibit the use of certain plastic containers or packaging materials. These regulations and policies, whatever their scope or form, could increase the cost of our beverage products or otherwise put the Company at a competitive disadvantage. In addition, our increased focus on reducing plastic containers and other major industrialized countries;packaging materials waste may require us or our bottling partners to incur additional expenses and to increase our capital expenditures. A reduction in consumer demand for our products and/or an increase in costs and expenditures relating to production and
23


distribution as a result of these environmental concerns regarding plastic bottles and other packaging materials could have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
Water scarcity and poor quality could negatively impact the outbreakCoca-Cola system’s costs and capacity.
Water is a main ingredient in substantially all of our products, is vital to the production of the agricultural ingredients on which our business relies and is needed in our manufacturing process. It also is critical to the prosperity of the communities we serve and the ecosystems in which we operate. Water is a limited resource in many parts of the world, facing unprecedented challenges from overexploitation, increasing demand for food and other consumer and industrial products whose manufacturing processes require water, increasing pollution and emerging awareness of potential contaminants, poor management, lack of physical or escalationfinancial access to water, sociopolitical tensions due to lack of armed hostilities; major natural disasters;public infrastructure in certain areas of the world and the effects of climate change. As the demand for water continues to increase around the world, and as water becomes scarcer and the quality of available water deteriorates, the Coca-Cola system may incur higher costs or widespread outbreaksface capacity constraints and the possibility of infectious diseases. Such eventsreputational damage, which could impairadversely affect our profitability.
Increased demand for food products and decreased agricultural productivity may negatively affect our business.
As part of the manufacture of our beverage products, we and our bottling partners use a number of key ingredients that are derived from agricultural commodities such as sugarcane, corn, sugar beets, citrus, coffee and tea. Increased demand for food products; decreased agricultural productivity in certain regions of the world as a result of changing weather patterns; increased agricultural regulations; and other factors have in the past, and may in the future, limit the availability and/or increase the cost of such agricultural commodities and could impact the food security of communities around the world. If we are unable to implement programs focused on economic opportunity and environmental sustainability to address these agricultural challenges and fail to make a strategic impact on food security through joint efforts with bottlers, farmers, communities, suppliers and key partners, as well as through our increased and continued investment in sustainable agriculture, our ability to managesource raw materials for use in our manufacturing processes and the affordability of our products and ultimately our business and results of operations could be negatively impacted.
Climate change and legal or regulatory responses thereto may have a long-term adverse impact on our business and results of operations.
There is increasing concern that a gradual increase in global average temperatures due to increased concentration of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases in the atmosphere will cause significant changes in weather patterns around the globe and an increase in the frequency and severity of natural disasters. Decreased agricultural productivity in certain regions of the world as a result of changing weather patterns may limit the availability or increase the cost of key agricultural commodities, such as sugarcane, corn, sugar beets, citrus, coffee and tea, which are important sources of ingredients for our products, and could impact the food security of communities around the world. Climate change may also exacerbate water scarcity and cause a further deterioration of water quality in affected regions, which could limit water availability for the Coca-Cola system’s bottling operations. Increased frequency or duration of extreme weather conditions could also impair production capabilities, disrupt our supply of raw materials and ingredients, and couldchain or impact production, transportation and delivery of concentrates, syrups and finished products. In addition, such events could cause disruption of regional or global economic activity, which could affect consumers' purchasing power in the affected areas and, therefore, reduce demand for our products. Increasing concern over climate change also may result in additional legal or regulatory requirements designed to reduce or mitigate the effects of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas emissions on the environment. Increased energy or compliance costs and expenses due to increased legal or regulatory requirements may cause disruptions in, or an increase in the costs associated with, the manufacturing and distribution of our beverage products. The effects of climate change and legal or regulatory initiatives to address climate change could have a long-term adverse impact on our business and results of operations. In addition, from time to time we establish and publicly announce goals and commitments to reduce the Coca-Cola system’s carbon footprint by increasing our use of recycled packaging materials, expanding our renewable energy usage, and participating in environmental and sustainability programs and initiatives organized or sponsored by nongovernmental organizations and other groups to reduce greenhouse gas emissions industrywide. If we and our bottling partners fail to achieve or improperly report on our progress toward achieving our carbon footprint reduction goals and commitments, the resulting negative publicity could adversely affect consumer preference for our beverage products.
Adverse weather conditions could reduce the demand for our products.
The sales of our products are influenced to some extent by weather conditions in the markets in which we operate. Unusually cold or rainy weather during the summer months may have a temporary effect on the demand for our products and contribute to lower sales, which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations for such periods.
ITEM 1B.  UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
Not applicable.

24


ITEM 2.  PROPERTIES
Our worldwide headquarters is located on a 35-acre office complex in Atlanta, Georgia. The complex includes our 621,000 square foot headquarters buildingseveral office buildings which are used by Corporate employees and an 870,000 square foot building in which our North America group's main offices are located. Theoperating segment employees. In addition, the complex also includes several other buildings, including our 264,000 square foot Coca-Cola Plaza building, technical and engineering facilities andalong with a reception center. We also own an office and retail building at 711 Fifth Avenue in New York, New York. These properties, except for the North America group's main offices, are included in Corporate. The North America group's main offices are included in the North America operating segment.
We own or lease additional facilities, real estate and office space throughout the world, which we use for administrative, manufacturing, processing, packaging, storage, warehousing, distribution and retail operations. These properties are generally included in the geographic operating segment in which they are located.located, with the exception of our Costa retail stores, which are included in the Global Ventures operating segment, and facilities related to our consolidated bottling and distribution operations, which are included in the Bottling Investments operating segment.
The following table summarizes our principal production facilities, distribution and storage facilities, and retail stores by operating segment and Corporate as of December 31, 2018:2021:
 Principal Concentrate and/or Syrup Plants Principal Beverage Manufacturing/Bottling Plants Distribution and Storage Warehouses
 Owned Leased Owned Leased Owned Leased
Europe, Middle East & Africa6
 
 
 
 
 1
Latin America5
 
 
 
 2
 6
North America11
 
 9
 1
 
 41
Asia Pacific6
 
 
 
 2
 9
Bottling Investments
 
 45
 5
 64
 69
Corporate3
 
 
 
 
 7
Total1
31
 
 54
 6
 68
 133
1 Does not include 36 owned and 2 leased principal beverage manufacturing/bottling plants and 23 owned and 30 leased distribution and
storage warehouses related to our discontinued operations.
Principal Concentrate and/or Syrup PlantsPrincipal Beverage Manufacturing/Bottling PlantsPrincipal Distribution and Storage FacilitiesPrincipal Retail Stores
OwnedLeasedOwnedLeasedOwnedLeasedOwnedLeased
Europe, Middle East & Africa— — 27 — 13 
Latin America— — — — — 
North America11 — — 23 — — 
Asia Pacific— — — — — 
Global Ventures— — — — 1,587 
Bottling Investments— — 82 105 99 — — 
Corporate— — — — — — 
Total32 — 93 116 166 — 1,600 
Management believes that our Company'sCompany’s facilities used for the production of our products are suitable and adequate, that they are being appropriately utilized in line with past experience, and that they have sufficient production capacity for their present intended purposes. The extent of utilization of suchour production facilities varies based upon seasonal demand for our products. However, management believes that additional production can be achieved at the existing facilities by adding personnel and capital equipment and,or, at some facilities, by adding shifts of personnel or expanding the facilities. We continuously review our anticipated requirements for facilities and, on the basis of that review, may from time to time acquire or lease additional facilities and/or dispose of existing facilities.
ITEM 3.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Company is involved in various legal proceedings, including the proceedings specifically discussed below. Management
believes that, except as disclosed in U.S.“U.S. Federal Income Tax Dispute Dispute”below, the total liabilities of the Company that may arise as a result of currently pending legal proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on the Company taken as a whole.
Aqua-Chem Litigation
On December 20, 2002, the Company filed a lawsuit (The(The Coca-Cola Company v. Aqua-Chem, Inc., Civil Action No. 2002CV631-50)2002CV631-50) in the Superior Court of Fulton County, Georgia ("(“Georgia Case"Case”), seeking a declaratory judgment that the Company has no obligation to its former subsidiary, Aqua-Chem, Inc., now known as Cleaver-Brooks, Inc. ("Aqua-Chem"(“Aqua-Chem”), for any past, present or future liabilities or expenses in connection with any claims or lawsuits against Aqua-Chem. Subsequent to the Company'sCompany’s filing but on the same day, Aqua-Chem filed a lawsuit (Aqua-Chem,(Aqua-Chem, Inc. v. The Coca-Cola Company, Civil Action No. 02CV012179)02CV012179) in the Circuit Court, Civil Division of Milwaukee County, Wisconsin ("(“Wisconsin Case"Case”). In the Wisconsin Case, Aqua-Chem sought a declaratory judgment that the Company is responsible for all liabilities and expenses not covered by insurance in connection with certain of Aqua-Chem'sAqua-Chem’s general and product liability claims arising from occurrences prior to the Company'sCompany’s sale of Aqua-Chem in 1981, and a judgment for breach of contract in an amount exceeding $9 million for costs incurred by Aqua-Chem to date in connection with such claims. The Wisconsin Case initially was stayed, pending final resolution of the Georgia Case, and later was voluntarily dismissed without prejudice by Aqua-Chem.
The Company owned Aqua-Chem from 1970 to 1981. During that time, the Company purchased over $400 million of insurance coverage, which also insures Aqua-Chem for some of its prior and future costs for certain product liability and other claims. The Company sold Aqua-Chem to Lyonnaise American Holding, Inc., in 1981 under the terms of a stock sale

agreement. The 1981 agreement, and a subsequent 1983 settlement agreement, outlined the parties'parties’ rights and obligations concerning past and future claims and lawsuits involving Aqua-Chem. Cleaver-Brooks, a division of Aqua-Chem, manufactured boilers, some of
25


which contained asbestos gaskets. Aqua-Chem was first named as a defendant in asbestos lawsuits in or around 1985 and currently has approximately 40,00015,000 active claims pending against it.
The parties agreed in 2004 to stay the Georgia Case pending the outcome of insurance coverage litigation filed by certain Aqua-Chem insurers on March 26, 2004. In the coverage action, five plaintiff insurance companies filed suit (Century(Century Indemnity Company, et al. v. Aqua-Chem, Inc., The Coca-Cola Company, et al., Case No. 04CV002852)04CV002852) in the Circuit Court, Civil Division of Milwaukee County, Wisconsin, against the Company, Aqua-Chem and 16 insurance companies. Several of the policies that were the subject of the coverage action had been issued to the Company during the period (1970 to 1981) when the Company owned Aqua-Chem. The complaint sought a determination of the respective rights and obligations under the insurance policies issued with regard to asbestos-related claims against Aqua-Chem. The action also sought a monetary judgment reimbursing any amounts paid by the plaintiffs in excess of their obligations. Two of the insurers, one with a $15 million policy limit and one with a $25 million policy limit, asserted cross-claims against the Company, alleging that the Company and/or its insurers are responsible for Aqua-Chem'sAqua-Chem’s asbestos liabilities before any obligation is triggered on the part of the cross-claimant insurers to pay for such costs under their policies.
Aqua-Chem and the Company filed and obtained a partial summary judgment determination in the coverage action that the insurers for Aqua-Chem and the Company were jointly and severally liable for coverage amounts, but reserving judgment on other defenses that might apply. During the course of the Wisconsin insurance coverage litigation, Aqua-Chem and the Company reached settlements with several of the insurers, including plaintiffs, who paid funds into escrow accounts for payment of costs arising from the asbestos claims against Aqua-Chem. On July 24, 2007, the Wisconsin trial court entered a final declaratory judgment regarding the rights and obligations of the parties under the insurance policies issued by the remaining defendant insurers, which judgment was not appealed. The judgment directs, among other things, that each insurer whose policy is triggered is jointly and severally liable for 100 percent of Aqua-Chem'sAqua-Chem’s losses up to policy limits. The court'scourt’s judgment concluded the Wisconsin insurance coverage litigation.
The Company and Aqua-Chem continued to pursue and obtain coverage agreements for the asbestos-related claims against Aqua-Chem with those insurance companies that did not settle in the Wisconsin insurance coverage litigation. The Company anticipated that a final settlement with three of those insurers ("(“Chartis insurers"insurers”) would be finalized in May 2011, but the Chartis insurers repudiated their settlement commitments and, as a result, Aqua-Chem and the Company filed suit against them in Wisconsin state court to enforce the coverage-in-place settlement or, in the alternative, to obtain a declaratory judgment validating Aqua-Chem and the Company'sCompany’s interpretation of the court'scourt’s judgment in the Wisconsin insurance coverage litigation.
In February 2012, the parties filed and argued a number of cross-motions for summary judgment related to the issues of the enforceability of the settlement agreement and the exhaustion of policies underlying those of the Chartis insurers. The court granted defendants'defendants’ motions for summary judgment that the 2011 Settlement Agreement and 2010 Term Sheet were not binding contracts, but denied their similar motions related to plaintiffs'plaintiffs’ claims for promissory and/or equitable estoppel. On or about May 15, 2012, the parties entered into a mutually agreeable settlement/stipulation resolving two major issues: exhaustion of underlying coverage and control of defense. On or about January 10, 2013, the parties reached a settlement of the estoppel claims and all of the remaining coverage issues, with the exception of one disputed issue relating to the scope of the Chartis insurers'insurers’ defense obligations in two policy years. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the Company and Aqua-Chem on that one open issue and entered a final appealable judgment to that effect following the parties'parties’ settlement. On January 23, 2013, the Chartis insurers filed a notice of appeal of the trial court'scourt’s summary judgment ruling. On October 29, 2013, the Wisconsin Court of Appeals affirmed the grant of summary judgment in favor of the Company and Aqua-Chem. On November 27, 2013, the Chartis insurers filed a petition for review in the Supreme Court of Wisconsin, and on December 11, 2013, the Company filed its opposition to that petition. On April 16, 2014, the Supreme Court of Wisconsin denied the Chartis insurers'insurers’ petition for review.
The Georgia Case remains subject to the stay agreed to in 2004.
U.S. Federal Income Tax Dispute
On September 17, 2015, the Company received a Statutory Notice of Deficiency ("Notice"(“Notice”) from the IRS seeking approximately $3.3 billion of additional federal income tax for the tax years 2007 through 2009, after a five-year audit.2009. In the Notice, the IRS claimedstated its intent to reallocate over $9 billion of income to the U.S. parent company from certain of its foreign affiliates that the Company's United States taxable income should be increased by an amount that creates a potential additional federal income tax liability of approximately $3.3 billion forU.S. parent company licensed to manufacture, distribute, sell, market and promote its products in certain non-U.S. markets.
The Notice concerned the period, plus interest. No penalties were asserted in the Notice. The disputed amounts largely relate to aCompany’s transfer pricing matter involvingbetween its U.S. parent company and certain of its foreign affiliates. IRS rules governing transfer pricing require arm’s-length pricing of transactions between related parties such as the appropriate amount of taxable income the Company should report in the United States in connection withCompany’s U.S. parent and its licensing of intangible property to certain related foreign licensees regarding the manufacturing, distribution, sale, marketing and promotion of products in overseas markets.affiliates.
During the 2007-2009 audit period, the Company followedTo resolve the same transfer pricing issue for the tax years 1987 through 1995, the Company and the IRS had agreed in 1996 on an arm’s-length methodology for these licensesdetermining the amount of U.S. taxable income that had consistently been followed since the methodology was agreed withU.S. parent company would report as
26


compensation from its foreign licensees. The Company and the IRS memorialized this accord in a 1996 closing agreement resolving that applied back to

1987.dispute (“Closing Agreement”). The closing agreementClosing Agreement provided prospective penalty protection conditioned on the Company’s continued adherence to the prescribed methodologythat, absent a change in material facts or circumstances and relevant federal tax law. Although the IRS subsequently asserted, without explanation, that material facts and circumstances andor relevant federal tax law, had changed, it hasin calculating the Company’s income taxes going forward, the Company would not asserted penalties. be assessed penalties by the IRS for using the agreed-upon tax calculation methodology that the Company and the IRS agreed would be used for the 1987 through 1995 tax years.
The Company'sIRS audited and confirmed the Company’s compliance with the closing agreement was audited and confirmed by the IRSagreed-upon Closing Agreement methodology in five successive audit cycles coveringfor tax years 1996 through 2006.
The September 17, 2015 Notice from the subsequent 11IRS retroactively rejected the previously agreed-upon methodology for the 2007 through 2009 tax years in favor of an entirely different methodology, without prior notice to the Company. Using the new tax calculation methodology, the IRS reallocated over $9 billion of income to the U.S. parent company from its foreign licensees for tax years 2007 through 2006,2009. Consistent with the last audit concluding as recently as 2009.Closing Agreement, the IRS did not assert penalties, and it has yet to     do so.
The Notice represents a repudiation of the methodology previously adopted in the 1996 closing agreement. The IRS designated the Company’s matter for litigation on October 15, 2015. ToLitigation designation is an IRS determination that forecloses to a company any and all alternative means for resolution of a tax dispute. As a result of the extentIRS’ designation of the Company’s matter for litigation, the Company was forced to either accept the IRS’ newly imposed tax assessment and pay the full amount of the asserted tax or litigate the matter in the federal courts. The matter remains designated,subject to the IRS’ litigation designation, preventing the Company will be prevented from pursuing any administrative settlement at IRS Appealsattempt to settle or underotherwise mutually resolve the IRS Advance Pricing and Mutual Agreement Program.matter with the IRS.
The Company firmly believes that the IRS' claims are without merit and is pursuing, and will continue to pursue, all available administrative and judicial remedies necessary to vigorously defend its position. To that end, the Company filedconsequently initiated litigation by filing a petition in the U.S. Tax Court onin December 14, 2015, andchallenging the tax adjustments enumerated in the Notice.
Prior to trial, the IRS filed its answer on February 12, 2016. On October 4, 2017, the IRS filed an amended answer to the Company's petition in which it increased its transfer pricing adjustment by $385 million, resulting in an additional tax adjustment of $135 million.
On June 20, 2017, the The Company filedobtained a motion for summary judgment in its favor on the portion of the IRS' adjustmentsa different matter related to our licensee in Mexico. On December 14, 2017, the U.S. Tax Court issued a decision on the summary judgment motion in favor of the Company. This decisionMexican foreign tax credits, which thereafter effectively reduced the IRS'IRS’ potential tax adjustment by approximately $138 million.
The U.S. Tax Court trial was held in the Tax Court from March 8, 2018 through May 11, 2018. The Company2018, and the IRSfinal post-trial briefs were filed and exchanged final post-trial briefs in FebruaryApril 2019. It is not known how much time will elapse thereafter prior
On November 18, 2020, the Tax Court issued the Opinion in which it predominantly sided with the IRS but agreed with the Company that dividends previously paid by the foreign licensees to the issuanceU.S. parent company in reliance upon the Closing Agreement should continue to be allowed to offset royalties, including those that would become payable to the Company in accordance with the Opinion. The Tax Court reserved ruling on the effect of Brazilian legal restrictions on the payment of royalties by the Company’s licensee in Brazil until after the Tax Court issues its opinion in the separate case of 3M Co. & Subs. v. Commissioner, T.C. Docket No. 5816-13 (filed March 11, 2013). Once the Tax Court issues its opinion in 3M Co. & Subs. v. Commissioner, the Company expects the Tax Court thereafter to render another opinion, and ultimately a final decision, in the Company’s case.
The Company believes that the IRS and the Tax Court misinterpreted and misapplied the applicable regulations in reallocating income earned by the Company’s foreign licensees to increase the Company’s U.S. tax. Moreover, the Company believes that the retroactive imposition of such tax liability using a calculation methodology different from that previously agreed upon by the IRS and the Company, and audited by the IRS for over a decade, is unconstitutional. The Company intends to assert its claims on appeal and vigorously defend its position.
In determining the amount of tax reserve to be recorded as of December 31, 2020, the Company completed the required two-step evaluation process prescribed by Accounting Standards Codification 740, Accounting for Income Taxes. In doing so, we consulted with outside advisors, and we reviewed and considered relevant laws, rules, and regulations, including, but not limited to, the Opinion and relevant caselaw. We also considered our intention to vigorously defend our positions and assert our various well-founded legal claims via every available avenue of appeal. We concluded, based on the technical and legal merits of the Court's decision.Company’s tax positions, that it is more likely than not the Company’s tax positions will ultimately be sustained on appeal. In addition, we considered a number of alternative transfer pricing methodologies, including the interim, or subsequentmethodology asserted by the IRS and affirmed in the Opinion (“Tax Court Methodology”), that could be applied by the courts upon final resolution of the litigation. Based on the required probability analysis, we determined the methodologies we believe the federal courts could ultimately order to be used in calculating the Company’s tax. As a result of this analysis, we recorded a tax reserve of $438 million during the year ended December 31, 2020 related to the Tax Court's decision,application of the IRS may propose similar adjustments for years subsequentresulting methodologies as well as the different tax treatment applicable to dividends originally paid to the 2007-2009 litigation period. U.S. parent company by its foreign licensees, in reliance upon the Closing Agreement, that would be recharacterized as royalties in accordance with the Opinion and the Company’s analysis.
The Company’s conclusion that it is more likely than not the Company’s tax positions will ultimately be sustained on appeal is unchanged as of December 31, 2021. However, we updated our calculation of the methodologies we believe the federal courts could ultimately order to be used in calculating the Company’s tax. As a result of the application of the required probability
27


analysis to these updated calculations and the accrual of interest through the current reporting period, we updated our tax reserve as of December 31, 2021 to $400 million.
While the Company continues to strongly disagreedisagrees with the IRS' position, there is no assurance thatIRS’ positions and the U.S. Tax Court will rule inportions of the Company's favor, andOpinion affirming such positions, it is possible that allsome portion or some portionall of the adjustment proposed by the IRS Noticeand sustained by the Tax Court could ultimately could be sustained.upheld. In that event, the Company willwould likely be subject to significant additional liabilities for thetax years at issue2007 through 2009, and potentially also for subsequent periods,years, which could have a material adverse impact on the Company'sCompany’s financial position, results of operations, and cash flows. Any
The Company calculated the potential impact of applying the Tax Court Methodology to reallocate income from foreign licensees potentially covered within the scope of the Opinion, assuming such methodology were to be ultimately upheld by the courts, and the IRS were to decide to apply that methodology to subsequent years, with consent of the federal courts. This impact would include taxes and interest accrued through December 31, 2021 for the 2007 through 2009 litigated tax years and for subsequent tax years from 2010 through 2021. The calculations incorporated the estimated impact of correlative adjustments related to years prior to 2018, either in the litigation period or later, may have an impact on thepreviously accrued transition tax payable under the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. The Company estimates that the potential aggregate incremental tax and interest liability could be approximately $13 billion as partof December 31, 2021. Additional income tax and interest would continue to accrue until the time any such potential liability, or portion thereof, were to be paid. We currently project the continued application of the Tax Reform Act.Court Methodology in future years, assuming similar facts and circumstances as of December 31, 2021, would result in an incremental annual tax liability that would increase the Company’s effective tax rate by approximately 3.5 percent.
The Company does not know when the Tax Court will issue its opinion regarding the effect of Brazilian legal restrictions on the payment of royalties by the Company’s licensee in Brazil for the 2007 through 2009 tax years. After the Tax Court issues its opinion on the Company’s Brazilian licensee, the Company and the IRS will be provided time to agree on the tax impact, if any, of both opinions, after which the Tax Court would render a final decision in the case. The Company will have 90 days thereafter to file a notice of appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit and pay the tax liability and interest related to the 2007 through 2009 tax years. The Company currently estimates that the payment to be made at that time related to the 2007 through 2009 tax years, which is included in the above estimate of the potential aggregate incremental tax and interest liability, would be approximately $4.9 billion (including interest accrued through December 31, 2021), plus any additional interest accrued through the time of payment. Some or all of this amount would be refunded if the Company were to prevail on appeal.
ITEM 4.  MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.

ITEM X.  INFORMATION ABOUT OUR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE COMPANY
The following are the executive officers of our Company as of February 21, 2019:22, 2022:
Manuel Arroyo, 51, is President of the Asia Pacific Group. Mr. Arroyo first joined the Company in 1995 in Madrid in brand management and served in roles of increasing responsibility with the Company until his appointment as General Manager for Spain in 2004, a position which he held until 2006. Mr. Arroyo served as President of the South East and West Asia business unit from 2006 to 2010 and as President of the ASEAN business unit from 2010 to August 2014. Mr. Arroyo served as Senior Vice President and President, Asia Pacific, of S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc., a multinational consumer product manufacturer, from September 2014 to May 2015, and as Chief Executive Officer of Deoleo, S.A., a Spanish multinational olive oil processing company, from May 2015 until September 2016. Mr. Arroyo returned to the Company as General Manager for Iberia in February 2017 and was appointed President of the Mexico business unit in July 2017, a position in which he served until his appointment as President of the Asia Pacific Group effective January 1, 2019.
NameAgePosition
Manuel Arroyo54Chief Marketing Officer since January 2020. President of the Asia Pacific Group from January 2019 to December 2020. President of the Mexico business unit from July 2017 to December 2018, and prior to that, General Manager for Iberia from February 2017. Prior to rejoining the Company in February 2017, Chief Executive Officer of Deoleo, S.A., a Spanish multinational olive oil processing company, from May 2015 to September 2016, and Senior Vice President and President, Asia Pacific, of S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc., a multinational consumer product manufacturer, from September 2014 to May 2015. President of the Company’s ASEAN business unit from 2010 to August 2014.
Henrique Braun

53President of the Latin America operating unit since January 2021, and prior to that, President of the Brazil business unit from September 2016. President of the Greater China and Korea business unit from March 2013 to September 2016.
Lisa Chang53Senior Vice President and Chief People Officer since March 2019 when she joined the Company. Prior to that, Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer for AMB Group LLC, which is the investment management and shared services arm of The Blank Family of Businesses, from 2014 through 2018. Prior to joining AMB Group LLC, Vice President of Human Resources for International at Equifax Inc. from 2013 through 2014, where she led human resources for all of its global locations.
Francisco Crespo, 53, is Senior Vice President and Chief Growth Officer of the Company. Mr. Crespo first joined the Company in 1989 in Ecuador, where he held a variety of operations roles. In 1992, Mr. Crespo was appointed Marketing Manager for Peru. In June 1995, he became Channel Marketing Manager in Argentina, and then held the role of Operations Manager for Coca-Cola de Argentina S.A. from July 1996 until his secondment to Coca-Cola FEMSA de Buenos Aires S.A. in July 1998, where he served as Commercial Director in Argentina until June 2000. He rejoined the Company as General Manager of Coca‑Cola de Chile S.A. in July 2000 and served in that capacity until July 2003. Mr. Crespo served as Vice President of Operations for the Brazil business unit from August 2003 to November 2005 and as President of the South Latin business unit, where he managed operations in Argentina, Bolivia, Chile, Paraguay, Peru and Uruguay, from December 2005 to December 2012. He was appointed President of the Company's Mexico business unit in January 2013 and served in that capacity until his appointment as Chief Growth Officer and election as Senior Vice President of the Company effective May 1, 2017.
28


James L. Dinkins, 56, is Senior Vice President of the Company and President, Coca-Cola North America. Mr. Dinkins joined the Company in 1988, serving in various account management, marketing and field sales roles with Coca-Cola USA until July 1999. He rejoined the Company in August 2002 as Managing Director, NCAA Sports, and held positions of increasing responsibility in the Coca-Cola Foodservice and On-Premise business of Coca-Cola North America. From November 2010 to April 2014, he served as President, 7-Eleven Global Customer Team, and from April 2014 to August 2014, he served as Senior Vice President, National Retail Sales for select grocery, club and convenience retail customers. From August 2014 to May 2017, he served as Chief Retail Sales Officer for Coca-Cola North America. From May 2017 to December 2017, he served as President of the Minute Maid business unit and Chief Retail Sales Officer for Coca-Cola North America. Mr. Dinkins was appointed President of Coca-Cola North America and elected Senior Vice President of the Company effective January 1, 2018.
Bernhard Goepelt, 56, is Senior Vice President and General Counsel of the Company. Mr. Goepelt joined the Company in 1992 as Legal Counsel for the German Division. In 1997, he was appointed Legal Counsel for the Middle and Far East Group, and in 1999 was appointed Division Counsel, Southeast and West Asia Division, based in Thailand. In 2003, Mr. Goepelt was appointed Group Counsel for the Central Europe, Eurasia and Middle East Group. In 2005, he assumed the position of General Counsel for Japan and China, and in 2007, Mr. Goepelt was appointed General Counsel, Pacific Group. In April 2010, he was appointed Associate General Counsel, Global Marketing, Commercial Leadership & Strategy, and in September 2010, he took on the additional responsibility of General Counsel for the Pacific Group. In addition to his functional responsibilities, he also managed the administration of the Legal Division. Mr. Goepelt was elected Senior Vice President and General Counsel of the Company in December 2011. Mr. Goepelt's management responsibilities were expanded in January 2016 to include the Company's Strategic Security function.
Muhtar Kent, 66, is Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company. Mr. Kent joined the Company in 1978 and held a variety of marketing and operations roles throughout his career with the Company. In 1985, he was appointed General Manager of Coca-Cola Turkey and Central Asia. From 1989 to 1995, Mr. Kent served as President of the East Central Europe Division and Senior Vice President of Coca-Cola International. Between 1995 and 1998, he served as Managing Director of Coca-Cola Amatil Limited-Europe, covering bottling operations in 12 countries, and from 1999 until 2005, he served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Efes Beverage Group, a diversified beverage company with Coca-Cola and beer operations across Southeast Europe, Turkey and Central Asia. Mr. Kent rejoined the Company in May 2005 as President and Chief Operating Officer, North Asia, Eurasia and Middle East Group, an organization serving a broad and diverse region that included China, Japan and Russia. He was appointed President, Coca-Cola International in January 2006 and was elected Executive Vice President of the Company in February 2006. He was elected President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company in December 2006 and was elected to the Board of Directors in April 2008. Mr. Kent was elected Chief Executive Officer of the Company in July 2008, and was elected Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company in April 2009. He served as President of the Company until August 2015 and as Chief Executive Officer of the Company through April 30, 2017. In December 2018, Mr. Kent provided notice to the Company of his intention to not stand for re-election at the Company's 2019

Annual Meeting of Shareowners and to retire from the position of Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company on the date of such meeting.
Nikos Koumettis, 54, is President of the Europe, Middle East and Africa Group. Mr. Koumettis joined the Company in January 2001 as Southeast Mediterranean Region General Manager for Greece and Cyprus. Mr. Koumettis served as President of the Adriatic and Balkans business unit from January 2003 to June 2008, as President of Coca-Cola Ltd. based in Canada from June 2008 to April 2011, and as President of the Central and Southern Europe business unit from April 2011 to April 2016. In April 2016, Mr. Koumettis was appointed President of the Central and Eastern Europe business unit based in Athens and continued in that position until his appointment as President of the Europe, Middle East and Africa Group effective January 1, 2019.
Robert Long, 61, is Senior Vice President and Chief Innovation Officer of the Company. Mr. Long joined the Company in April 2004 as Vice President, Global Packaging Platforms. In October 2007, he moved to Japan to lead research and development for Japan, a position he held until coming to Coca-Cola North America in August 2010 to lead research and development. In October 2012, he also assumed North America responsibility for Technical Governance (Quality, Environment, Safety and Scientific & Regulatory Affairs). Mr. Long served as Vice President, Research and Development, of the Company from December 2016 until his appointment as Chief Innovation Officer and election as Senior Vice President of the Company effective May 1, 2017.
Jennifer K. Mann, 46, is Senior Vice President, Chief People Officer and President, Global Ventures, of the Company. Ms. Mann joined the Company in 1997 as Manager in the National Customer Support Division of Coca-Cola North America. She served as Vice President and General Manager of Coca-Cola Freestyle from June 2012 until October 2015, when she was appointed Chief of Staff for James Quincey, then President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company. Ms. Mann was appointed Chief People Officer and elected Senior Vice President of the Company effective May 1, 2017 and continued to serve as Chief of Staff for the Chief Executive Officer of the Company until October 2018. Ms. Mann was appointed to the additional position of President, Global Ventures, of the Company effective January 1, 2019.
John Murphy, 57, is Senior Vice President and Deputy Chief Financial Officer of the Company. Mr. Murphy joined the Company in 1988 as an International Internal Auditor. In 1991, he moved to Coca-Cola Japan and served as Executive Assistant to the Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Murphy served in various finance, planning and operations roles with expanded responsibilities at Coca-Cola Japan and subsequently worked for F&N Coca-Cola Ltd., the Coca-Cola bottling partner in Singapore. He rejoined the Company in 1996 as Region Manager in Indonesia. From March 2000 to November 2000, Mr. Murphy served as Vice President of Business Systems in Coca-Cola North America, and from December 2000 to May 2003, he served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Coca-Cola Japan. From June 2003 to May 2005, he served as Deputy President of Coca-Cola Japan, and in June 2005, he was appointed Vice President of Strategic Planning of the Company, a position he held until he became President of the Latin Center business unit in October 2008. Mr. Murphy was appointed President of the South Latin business unit in January 2013 and served in that role until his appointment to the position of President of the Asia Pacific Group in August 2016. Mr. Murphy was elected Senior Vice President and Deputy Chief Financial Officer of the Company effective January 1, 2019. In October 2018, Mr. Murphy was elected Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company with effect on March 16, 2019. 
Beatriz Perez, 49, is Senior Vice President and Chief Communications, Public Affairs, Sustainability and Marketing Assets Officer of the Company. Ms. Perez joined the Company in 1996 and has served in various roles of increasing responsibility in brand and marketing management, field operations, sustainability, public affairs and communications. From April 2010 to June 2011, she served as Chief Marketing Officer for Coca-Cola North America. She served as the Company's first Chief Sustainability Officer from July 2011 to April 2017, and as Vice President, Global Partnerships and Licensing, Retail and Attractions from July 2016 to April 2017. Ms. Perez was appointed Chief Public Affairs, Communications and Sustainability Officer of the Company effective May 1, 2017 (Ms. Perez's functional title was subsequently changed to Chief Communications, Public Affairs, Sustainability and Marketing Assets Officer). Ms. Perez was elected Vice President of the Company in July 2011 and served in that capacity until her election as Senior Vice President of the Company effective May 1, 2017.
Nancy Quan,52, is Senior Vice President and Chief Technical Officer of the Company. Ms. Quan joined the Company in May 2007 as R&D General Manager for the Europe and Eurasia Group. Ms. Quan served as Vice President, Innovation, of the Company from April 2008 to January 2010, as Vice President, R&D, for the Pacific Group from January 2010 to January 2012, and as Global R&D Officer for the Company from January 2012 to July 2016. Ms. Quan was appointed Chief Technical Officer of Coca-Cola North America in July 2016 and continued in that position until her election as Senior Vice President and Chief Technical Officer of the Company effective January 1, 2019.
James Quincey, 54, is Chief Executive Officer and a Director of the Company. Mr. Quincey joined the Company in 1996 as Director, Learning Strategy for the Latin America Group. He went on to serve in a series of operational roles of increasing responsibility in Latin America, leading to his appointment as President of the South Latin Division in December 2003, a position in which he served until his appointment as President of the Mexico Division in December 2005. In October 2008, he

was named President of the Northwest Europe and Nordics business unit and served in that role until he was appointed President of the Europe Group in January 2013. He was elected President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company in August 2015 and President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company effective May 1, 2017. Mr. Quincey served as President until December 2018. Mr. Quincey was first elected to the Board of Directors of the Company in April 2017. In December 2018, the Board of Directors elected Mr. Quincey to serve as Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company following Mr. Kent's retirement at the Company's 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareowners, contingent on Mr. Quincey's re-election as a Director at the 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareowners.
Alfredo Rivera, 57, is President of the Latin America Group. Mr. Rivera joined the Company in 1997 as a District Manager for Guatemala and El Salvador. In 1999, he was appointed Southeast Region Manager in the Brazil Division, serving in this role until December 2003. From January 2004 to August 2006, he served as General Manager for the Ecuador business. From September 2006 to December 2012, Mr. Rivera served as Sparkling Beverages General Manager for the Mexico business unit. In January 2013, he was appointed President of the Latin Center business unit and served in that role until his appointment to his current position in August 2016.
Barry Simpson, 58, is Senior Vice President and Chief Information and Integrated Services Officer of the Company. In 2008, Mr. Simpson joined the Coca-Cola system, where he served as Chief Information Officer of Coca-Cola Amatil Limited, a Coca-Cola bottler based in Sydney, Australia, until December 2015. He joined the Company in January 2016 as the head of Global Business Unit Information Technology Services. Mr. Simpson was appointed Chief Information Officer in October 2016 and was elected Senior Vice President of the Company in December 2016. Effective January 1, 2019, Mr. Simpson's duties were expanded to include oversight of portions of the Company's Enabling Services organization and his title was changed to Senior Vice President and Chief Information and Integrated Services Officer of the Company.
Brian Smith,63, is President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company. Mr. Smith joined the Company in 1997 as Latin America Group Manager for Mergers and Acquisitions, a role he held until July 2001. From 2001 to 2002, he worked as Executive Assistant to Brian Dyson, then Chief Operating Officer and Vice Chairman of the Company. Mr. Smith served as President of the Brazil Division from 2002 to 2008 and President of the Mexico business unit from 2008 through December 2012. Mr. Smith served as President of the Latin America Group from January 2013 to August 2016 and as President of the Europe, Middle East and Africa Group from August 2016 until his election as President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company effective January 1, 2019.
Kathy N. Waller,60, is Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company. Ms. Waller joined the Company in 1987 as a senior accountant in the Accounting Research Department and has served in a number of accounting and finance roles of increasing responsibility. From July 2004 to August 2009, Ms. Waller served as Chief of Internal Audit. In December 2005, she was elected Vice President of the Company, and in August 2009, she was elected Controller. In August 2013, she became Vice President, Finance and Controller, assuming additional responsibilities for corporate treasury, corporate tax and finance capabilities, and served in that position until April 2014, when she was appointed Chief Financial Officer and elected Executive Vice President. Ms. Waller assumed expanded responsibility for the Company's strategic governance areas as President, Enabling Services, on May 1, 2017 and served in that capacity until December 31, 2018. In October 2018, the Company announced that Ms. Waller will retire from the Company on March 15, 2019.
Monica Howard Douglas49Senior Vice President and General Counsel since April 2021, and prior to that, Chief Compliance Officer and Associate General Counsel of the North America operating unit from January 2018. Legal director for the Southern and East Africa business unit from September 2013 to December 2017, and Vice President of Supply Chain and Consumer Affairs and Senior Managing Counsel, Coca-Cola Refreshments, from 2008 to September 2013.
Nikolaos Koumettis57President of the Europe operating unit since January 2021, and prior to that, President of the Europe, Middle East and Africa Group from January 2019. President of the Central and Eastern Europe business unit from April 2016 to December 2018, and President of the Central and Southern Europe business unit from April 2011 to April 2016.
Jennifer K. Mann49President, Global Ventures since January 2019 and Senior Vice President since May 2017. Served as Chief People Officer from May 2017 to March 2019 and as Chief of Staff for James Quincey, then President and Chief Operating Officer and later Chief Executive Officer, from October 2015 to October 2018. Vice President and General Manager of Coca-Cola Freestyle from June 2012 to October 2015.
John Murphy60Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since March 2019, and prior to that, Senior Vice President and Deputy Chief Financial Officer from January 2019. President of the Asia Pacific Group from August 2016 to December 2018, and President of the South Latin business unit from January 2013 to August 2016.
Beatriz Perez52Senior Vice President and Chief of Communications, Sustainability and Strategic Partnerships since May 2017. Served as the Company’s first Chief Sustainability Officer from July 2011 to April 2017, and as Vice President, Global Partnerships and Licensing, Retail and Attractions from July 2016 to April 2017. Chair of The Coca-Cola Foundation, Inc., the Company’s primary international philanthropic arm, since October 2017.
Nancy Quan55Senior Vice President since January 2019. Chief Technical and Innovation Officer since February 2021, and prior to that, Chief Technical Officer from January 2019, and Chief Technical Officer of Coca-Cola North America from July 2016. Global R&D Officer from January 2012 to July 2016.
James Quincey57Chairman of the Board of Directors since April 2019 and Chief Executive Officer since May 2017. Elected to the Board of Directors in April 2017. President from April 2015 to December 2018, and Chief Operating Officer from August 2015 to April 2017.
Alfredo Rivera60President of the North America operating unit since August 2020, and prior to that, President of the Latin America Group from August 2016. President of the Latin Center business unit from January 2013 to August 2016.
Barry Simpson61Senior Vice President since December 2016 and Chief Platform Services Officer since January 1, 2021. Prior to that, Chief Information and Integrated Services Officer from January 2019, when his duties were expanded to include oversight of portions of the Company’s Enabling Services organization, and Chief Information Officer from October 2016. Prior to joining the Company in January 2016 as the head of Global Business Unit Information Technology Services, Chief Information Officer of Coca-Cola Amatil Limited, a Coca-Cola bottler based in Sydney, Australia, from 2008 to December 2015.
Brian Smith66President and Chief Operating Officer since January 2019, and prior to that, President of the Europe, Middle East and Africa Group from August 2016. President of the Latin America Group from January 2013 to August 2016.
All executive officers serve at the pleasure of the Board of Directors. There is no family relationship between any of the Directors or executive officers of the Company.

29
PART


Part II
ITEM 5.  MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'SREGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
The principal United States market in which the Company'sCompany’s common stock is listed and traded is the New York Stock Exchange and the corresponding trading symbol is "KO."“KO.”
While we have historically paid dividends to holders of our common stock on a quarterly basis, the declaration and payment of future dividends will depend on many factors, including, but not limited to, our earnings, financial condition, business development needs and regulatory considerations, and are at the discretion of our Board of Directors.
As of February 15, 2019,18, 2022, there were 206,575191,391 shareowner accounts of record. This figure does not include a substantially greater number of "street name"“street name” holders or beneficial holders of our common stock, whose shares are held of record by banks, brokers and other financial institutions.
The information under the subheading "Equity“Equity Compensation Plan Information"Information” under the principal heading "Compensation"“Compensation” in the Company'sCompany’s definitive Proxy Statement for the 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareowners to be held on April 24, 2019 ("Company's 2019(“Company’s 2022 Proxy Statement"Statement”), to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission,SEC, is incorporated herein by reference.
During the year ended December 31, 2018,2021, no equity securities of the Company were sold by the Company that were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
The following table presents information with respect to purchases of common stock of the Company made during the three months ended December 31, 20182021 by the Company or any "affiliated purchaser"“affiliated purchaser” of the Company as defined in Rule 10b-18(a)(3) under the Exchange Act.Act:
PeriodTotal Number of
Shares Purchased
1Average
Price Paid
Per Share
Total Number of
Shares Purchased
as Part of Publicly
Announced Plan
2Maximum Number of Shares That May
Yet Be Purchased
Under Publicly
Announced Plans
3
October 2, 2021 through October 29, 20219,480 $54.48 — 161,029,667 
October 30, 2021 through November 26, 2021— — — 161,029,667 
November 27, 2021 through December 31, 2021106,605 53.64 — 161,029,667 
Total116,085 $53.71 — 
1The total number of shares purchased includes: (i) shares purchased, if any, pursuant to the 2012 Plan described in footnote 2 below and (ii) shares surrendered to the Company to pay the exercise price and/or to satisfy tax withholding obligations in connection with so-called stock swap exercises of employee stock options and/or the vesting of restricted stock issued to employees.
2On October 18, 2012, the Company publicly announced that our Board of Directors had authorized a plan (“2012 Plan”) for the Company to purchase up to 500 million shares of our common stock. This column discloses the number of shares purchased pursuant to the 2012 Plan during the indicated time periods (including shares purchased pursuant to the terms of preset trading plans meeting the requirements of Rule 10b5-1 under the Exchange Act).
3On February 21, 2019, the Company publicly announced that our Board of Directors had authorized a new plan (“2019 Plan”) for the Company to purchase up to 150 million shares of our common stock following the completion of the 2012 Plan. This column discloses the number of shares available for purchase under the 2012 Plan and the number of shares authorized for purchase under the 2019 Plan.
30

Period
Total Number of
Shares Purchased1

 
Average
Price Paid
Per Share

 
Total Number of
Shares Purchased
as Part of Publicly
Announced Plan2

 
Maximum Number of
Shares That May
Yet Be Purchased
Under the Publicly
Announced Plan

September 29, 2018 through October 26, 20182,584,881
 $45.93
 2,584,800
 35,604,612
October 27, 2018 through November 23, 20184,499,050
 49.25
 3,584,201
 32,020,411
November 24, 2018 through December 31, 2018186,525
 48.48
 
 32,020,411
Total7,270,456
 $48.05
 6,169,001
  

1
The total number of shares purchased includes: (i) shares purchased pursuant to the 2012 Plan described in footnote 2 below and (ii) shares surrendered to the Company to pay the exercise price and/or to satisfy tax withholding obligations in connection with so-called stock swap exercises of employee stock options and/or the vesting of restricted stock issued to employees.
2
On October 18, 2012, the Company publicly announced that our Board of Directors had authorized a plan ("2012 Plan") for the Company to purchase up to 500 million shares of our Company's common stock. This column discloses the number of shares purchased pursuant to the 2012 Plan during the indicated time periods (including shares purchased pursuant to the terms of preset trading plans meeting the requirements of Rule 10b5-1 under the Exchange Act).

Performance Graph
Comparison of Five-Year Cumulative Total Shareowner Return Among
The Coca-Cola Company, the Peer Group Index and the S&P 500 Index
Total Shareowner Return
Stock Price Plus Reinvested Dividends
chart-b10090ab605d516db01.jpgko-20211231_g2.jpg


December 31,2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
December 31,201620172018201920202021
The Coca-Cola Company$100
$105
$111
$110
$126
$135
The Coca-Cola Company$100 $114 $122 $147 $151 $168 
Peer Group Index100
113
128
142
158
128
Peer Group Index100 111 90 112 121 139 
S&P 500 Index100
114
115
129
157
150
S&P 500 Index100 122 116 153 181 233 
The total shareowner return assumes that dividends were reinvested daily and is based on a $100 investment on December 31, 2013.2016 and assumes that dividends were reinvested on the day of issuance.
The Peer Group Index is a self-constructed peer group of companies that are included in the Dow Jones Food & Beverage Index and the Dow Jones Tobacco Index, from which the Company has been excluded.
The Peer Group Index consists of the following companies: Altria Group, Inc., Archer Daniels Midland Company, B&G Foods,Beyond Meat, Inc., The Boston Beer Company, Inc., Brown-Forman Corporation, Bunge Limited, Campbell Soup Company, ConagraConAgra Brands, Inc., Constellation Brands, Inc., Darling Ingredients Inc., Flowers Foods, Inc., Freshpet Inc., General Mills, Inc., The Hain Celestial Group, Inc., Herbalife Nutrition Ltd., The Hershey Company, Hormel Foods Corporation, Ingredion Incorporated, Jefferies Financial Group Inc., Kellogg Company, The Kraft Heinz Company, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc., The Kraft Heinz Company, Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc., Lancaster Colony Corporation, McCormick & Company, Incorporated, Molson Coors Brewing Company, Mondelēz International, Inc., Monster Beverage Corporation, National Beverage Corp., PepsiCo, Inc., Performance Food Group Company, Philip Morris International Inc., Pilgrim'sPilgrim’s Pride Corporation, Post Holdings, Inc., Seaboard Corporation, The J.M. Smucker Company, TreeHouse Foods, Inc., Tyson Foods, Inc. and US Foods Holding Corp.
Companies included in the Dow Jones Food & Beverage Index and the Dow Jones Tobacco Index change periodically. In 2018,2021, the indicesDow Jones Food & Beverage Index and the Peer Group Index included Jefferies Financial GroupFreshpet Inc., Keurig Dr Pepper Inc., National Beverage Corp., Performance Food Group Company, Pilgrim's Pride Corporation and Seaboard Corporation, which werewas not included in the indices in 2017.2020. Additionally, thein 2021 these indices do not include Dean Foods Company, Dr Pepper SnappleJefferies Financial Group Inc., Leucadia National Corporation, Pinnacle and TreeHouse Foods, Inc. and Snyder's-Lance, Inc., which were included in the indices in 2017.2020.

31



ITEM 6.  SELECTED FINANCIAL DATAINTENTIONALLY OMITTED
The following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and our consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes thereto contained in "Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" of this report.
Year Ended December 31,2018
 2017
 2016
 2015
 2014
(In millions except per share data)   
SUMMARY OF OPERATIONS         
Net operating revenues$31,856
 $35,410
 $41,863
 $44,294
 $45,998
Net income from continuing operations6,727
 1,182
 6,550
 7,366
 7,124
Net income attributable to shareowners of
   The Coca-Cola Company
6,434
 1,248
 6,527
 7,351
 7,098
PER SHARE DATA         
Basic net income from continuing operations1
$1.58
 $0.28
 $1.51
 $1.69
 $1.62
Basic net income1.51
 0.29
 1.51
 1.69
 1.62
Diluted net income from continuing operations1
1.57
 0.27
 1.49
 1.67
 1.60
Diluted net income1.50
 0.29
 1.49
 1.67
 1.60
Cash dividends1.56
 1.48
 1.40
 1.32
 1.22
BALANCE SHEET DATA         
Total assets$83,216
 $87,896
 $87,270
 $89,996
 $91,968
Long-term debt25,364
 31,182
 29,684
 28,311
 19,010
1
Calculated based on net income from continuing operations less net income from continuing operations attributable to noncontrolling interests.
The Company's results are impacted by acquisitions and divestitures. Refer to "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" for additional information.
ITEM 7.  MANAGEMENT'SMANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Overview
The following Management'sManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations ("(“MD&A"&A”) is intended to help the reader understand The Coca-Cola Company, our operations and our present business environment. MD&A is provided as a supplement to, and should be read in conjunction with, — our consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes thereto contained in "Item“Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data"Data” of this report. This overview summarizes the MD&A which includes the following sections:
Our Business — a general description of our business and the nonalcoholic beverage segment of the commercial beverage industry; our objective; our strategic priorities; our core capabilities; andits challenges and risks of our business.
risks.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates — a discussion of accounting policies that require critical judgments and estimates.
Operations Review — an analysis of our Company's consolidated results of operations for the three years presented in2021 and 2020 and year-to-year comparisons between 2021 and 2020. An analysis of our consolidated financial statements. Except toresults of operations for 2020 and 2019 and year-to-year comparisons between 2020 and 2019 can be found in MD&A in Part II, Item 7 of the extent that differences among our operating segments are material to an understanding of our business as a whole, we presentCompany’s Form 10-K for the discussion on a consolidated basis.
year ended December 31, 2020.
Liquidity, Capital Resources and Financial Position — an analysis of cash flows; off-balance sheet arrangementsflows, contractual obligations, foreign exchange, and aggregate contractual obligations; foreign exchange; the impact of inflation and changing prices; and an overview of financial position.prices.

Our Business
General
The Coca-Cola Company is the world's largest nonalcoholica total beverage company. We own or licensecompany, and market more than 500 nonalcoholic beverage brands, which we group into the following category clusters: sparkling soft drinks; water, enhanced water and sports drinks; juice, dairy and plant-based beverages; tea and coffee; and energy drinks. We own and market four of the world's top five nonalcoholic sparkling soft drink brands: Coca-Cola, Diet Coke, Fanta and Sprite. Finished beverage products bearing our trademarks, sold in the United States since 1886, are now sold in more than 200 countries and territories. We own or license and market numerous beverage brands, which we group into the following categories: Trademark Coca-Cola; sparkling flavors; hydration, sports, coffee and tea; nutrition, juice, dairy and plant-based beverages; and emerging beverages. We own and market five of the world’s top six nonalcoholic sparkling soft drink brands: Coca-Cola, Sprite, Fanta, Diet Coke and Coca-Cola Zero Sugar.
We make our branded beverage products available to consumers throughout the world through our network of independent bottling partners, distributors, wholesalers and retailers as well as Company-owned or -controlledthe Company’s consolidated bottling and distribution operations — the world's largest beverage distribution system.operations. Beverages bearing trademarks owned by or licensed to us account for more than 1.92.1 billion of the approximately 6163 billion servings of all beverages consumed worldwide every day.
We believe our success depends on our ability to connect with consumers by providing them with a wide variety of beverage choicesoptions to meet their desires, needs and lifestyle choices.lifestyles. Our success further depends on the ability of our people to execute effectively, every day.
Our Company markets, manufactures and sells:
beverage concentrates, sometimes referred to as "beverage“beverage bases," and syrups, including fountain syrups (we refer to this part of our business as our "concentrate business" or "concentrate operations"“concentrate operations”); and
finished sparkling soft drinks and other nonalcoholic beverages (we refer to this part of our business as our "finished“finished product business" or "finished product operations"operations”).
Generally, finished product operations generate higher net operating revenues but lower gross profit margins than concentrate operations.
In our domestic and internationalOur concentrate operations we typically generate net operating revenues by selling concentrates, syrups and certain finished beverages to authorized bottling operations (to which we typically refer as our "bottlers"“bottlers” or our "bottling partners"“bottling partners”). Our bottling partners either combine the concentrates with still or sparkling water and sweeteners (depending on the product), still water and/or sparkling water, or combine the syrups with still or sparkling water, to produce finished beverages. The finished beverages are packaged in authorized containers, such as cans and refillable and nonrefillable glass and plastic bottles, bearing our trademarks or trademarks licensed to us and are then sold to retailers directly or, in some cases, through wholesalers or other bottlers. In addition, outside the United States, our bottling partners are typically authorized to manufacture fountain syrups, using our concentrate,concentrates, which they sell to fountain retailers for use in producing beverages for immediate consumption, or to authorized fountain wholesalers who
32


in turn sell and distribute the fountain syrups to fountain retailers. Our concentrate operations are included in our geographic operating segments.segments and our Global Ventures operating segment.
Our finished product operations generate net operating revenues by selling sparkling soft drinks and a variety of other finished nonalcoholic beverages such as water, enhanced water and sports drinks; juice, dairy and plant-based beverages; tea and coffee; and energy drinks, to retailers, or to distributors and wholesalers who distribute themin turn sell the beverages to retailers. These operations consist primarily of Company-owned or -controlledour consolidated bottling sales and distribution operations, which are included in our Bottling Investments operating segment. In certain markets, the Company also operates non-bottling finished product operations in which we sell finished beverages to distributors and wholesalers that are generally not one of the Company'sCompany’s bottling partners. These operations are generally included in one of our geographic operating segments.segments or our Global Ventures operating segment. Additionally, we sell directly to consumers through retail stores operated by Costa. These sales are included in our Global Ventures operating segment. In the United States, we manufacture fountain syrups and sell them to fountain retailers, who use the fountain syrups to produce beverages for immediate consumption, or to authorized fountain wholesalers or bottling partners who resellin turn sell the fountain syrups to fountain retailers. These fountain syrup sales are included in our North America operating segment.
The following table sets forth the percentage of total net operating revenues relatedattributable to concentrate operations and finished product operations:
Year Ended December 31,2018
2017
2016
Year Ended December 31,20212020
Concentrate operations64%51%40%Concentrate operations56 %56 %
Finished product operations36
49
60
Finished product operations44 44 
Total100%100%100%Total100 %100 %
The following table sets forth the percentage of total worldwide unit case volume relatedattributable to concentrate operations and finished product operations:
Year Ended December 31,2018
2017
2016
Concentrate operations85%78%76%
Finished product operations15
22
24
Total100%100%100%
The Nonalcoholic Beverage Segment of the Commercial Beverage Industry
Year Ended December 31,20212020
Concentrate operations83 %82 %
Finished product operations17 18 
Total100 %100 %
We operate in the highly competitive nonalcoholic beverage segment of the commercial beverage industry. We face strong competition from numerous other general and specialty beverage companies. We, along with other beverage companies, are affected by a number of factors, including, but not limited to, the cost to manufacture and distribute products, consumer spending, economic conditions, availability and quality of water, consumer preferences, inflation, political climate,climates, local and national laws and regulations, foreign currency fluctuations, fuel prices, weather patterns and weather patterns.the COVID-19 pandemic.
Throughout 2021, the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and the related actions by governments around the world to attempt to contain the spread of the virus continued to impact our business globally. In particular, the number of people contracting COVID-19 and the preventive measures taken to contain COVID-19, including the spread of new variants, negatively impacted our unit case volume and increased our costs to manufacture and distribute our products. Our Objectiveprice, product and geographic mix was also negatively impacted, primarily due to unfavorable channel and product mix as consumer demand shifted to more at-home consumption versus away-from-home consumption. However, the timing and number of people receiving vaccinations, the governmental actions to reopen certain economies around the world, and the substance and pace of the economic recovery favorably impacted our business when compared to 2020. While uncertainties caused by the COVID-19 pandemic remain, and factors such as the state of the supply chain, labor shortages and the inflationary environment are likely to impact the pace of the economic recovery, we expect to continue to see improvements in our business as we continue to learn and adapt to the ever-changing environment.
Our objective is to useThe Company’s priorities during the COVID-19 pandemic and related business disruptions are ensuring the health and safety of our formidable assets —employees; supporting and making a difference in the communities we serve; keeping our brands financial strength, unrivaled distribution system, global reach,in supply; maintaining the quality and the talent and strong commitmentsafety of our products; and serving our customers across all channels as they adapt to the shifting demands of consumers during the pandemic.
Throughout the pandemic, business continuity and adapting to the needs of our customers have been critical. We have developed systemwide knowledge-sharing routines and processes, which include the management of any supply chain challenges. As of the date of this filing, while we have experienced some temporary supply chain disruptions, there has been no material impact, and we do not foresee a material impact, on our and our bottling partners’ ability to manufacture or distribute our products.
33


Despite the pandemic, we are not losing sight of long-term opportunities for our business. The pandemic helped us realize we could be much bolder in our efforts to change. We identified the following key objectives to navigate the pandemic and position us to capture growth: winning more consumers; gaining market share; maintaining strong system economics; strengthening stakeholder impact; and equipping the organization to win. In order to deliver against these objectives, we focused on the following priorities: unlocking the potential of our portfolio of strong global, regional and scaled local brands; developing a robust innovation pipeline focusing on scalable initiatives; increasing consumer-centric marketing effectiveness and efficiency; winning in the marketplace with aligned data-driven revenue growth management and associates —execution capabilities; and further embedding ESG goals into our operations. In August 2020, the Company announced strategic steps to achieve long-term sustainable growth. To accomplishtransform our objective, we are focused on:
Disciplinedorganizational structure to better enable us to capture growth
Turning our passion for consumers into drinks people come back to again and again, whether that means less sugar, more vitamins, or exciting new flavors
Building relevant brands people love and scaling them around the world quickly and consistently
Using the Coca-Cola system advantage to put our drinks in more hands in more places more quickly than anyone else
Doing business the right way, not just the easy way
Being leaders in responsible water use and giving back to nature and communities
Contributing to the elimination of waste, including through package innovation, sharing of package innovation and recycling initiatives
Caring for people and communities, with a special focus on women’s economic empowerment
Tappingfast-changing marketplace. The Company has transformed into the passion of our people
Building an inclusive culture of curiosity and empowerment where diverse perspectives are essential as we strive for progress, not perfection
Strategic Priorities
We have five strategic prioritiesa networked global organization designed to help us achieve our objective. These strategic priorities are accelerating growth of a consumer-centric brand portfolio; driving our revenue growth algorithm; strengthening the Coca-Cola system; digitizing the enterprise; and unlockingcombine the power of scale with the deep knowledge required to win locally. Refer to Note 18 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information about our people. In order to execute on these strategic priorities, we must further enhance our core capabilities of consumer marketing, commercial leadership and franchise leadership.
Core Capabilities
Consumer Marketing
Marketing investments are designed to enhance consumer awareness of, and increase consumer preference for, our brands. Successful marketing investments produce long-term growth in unit case volume, per capita consumption and our share of worldwide nonalcoholic beverage sales. Through our relationships with our bottling partners and those who sell our products in the marketplace, we create and implement integrated marketing programs, both globally and locally, that are designed to heighten consumer awareness of and product appeal for our brands. In developing a strategy for a Company brand, we conduct product and packaging research, establish brand positioning, develop precise consumer communications and solicit consumer feedback. Our integrated marketing activities include, but are not limited to, advertising, point-of-sale merchandising and sales promotions.
We are focusing on marketing strategies to drive volume growth in emerging markets, increase our brand value in developing markets and grow net revenues and profit in our developed markets. In emerging markets, we are investing in infrastructure programs that drive volume through increased access to consumers. In developing markets, where consumer access has largely been established, our focus is on differentiating our brands. In our developed markets, we continue to invest in brands and infrastructure programs but generally at a slower rate than gross profit growth.

Commercial Leadership
The Coca-Cola system has millions of customers around the world who sell or serve our products directly to consumers. We focus on enhancing value for our customers and providing solutions to grow their beverage businesses. Our approach includes understanding each customer's business and needs — whether that customer is a sophisticated retailer in a developed market or a kiosk owner in an emerging market. We focus on ensuring that our customers have the right product and package offerings and the right promotional tools to deliver enhanced value to themselves and the Company. We are constantly looking to build new beverage consumption occasions in our customers' outlets through unique and innovative consumer experiences, product availability and delivery systems, and beverage merchandising and displays. We participate in brand-building initiatives with our customers in order to drive consumer preference for our brands. Through our commercial leadership initiatives, we embed ourselves further into our retail customers' businesses while developing strategies for better execution at the point of sale.
Franchise Leadership
We must continue to improve our franchise leadership capabilities to give our Company and our bottling partners the ability to grow together through shared values, aligned incentives and a sense of urgency and flexibility that supports consumers' always changing needs and tastes. The financial health and success of our bottling partners are critical components of the Company's success. We work with our bottling partners to identify processes that enable us to quickly achieve scale and efficiencies, and we share best practices throughout the bottling system. With our bottling partners, we work to produce differentiated beverages and packages that are appropriate for the right channels and consumers. We also design business models in specific markets to ensure that we appropriately share the value created by our beverages with our bottling partners. We must also continue to build a supply chain network that leverages the size and scale of the Coca-Cola system to gain a competitive advantage.realignment initiatives.
Challenges and Risks
Being global provides unique opportunities for our Company. Challenges and risks accompany those opportunities. Our management has identified certain challenges and risks that demand the attention of the nonalcoholic beverage segment ofour Company and the commercial beverage industry and our Company.industry. Of these, five key challenges and risks are discussed below.
Obesity
The rates of obesity affecting communities, cultures and countries worldwide continue to be too high. There is growing concern among consumers, public health professionals and government agencies about the health problems associated with obesity. This concern represents a significant challenge to our industry. We understand and recognize that obesity is a complex public health challenge and are committed to being a part of the solution.
We recognize the uniqueness of consumers'consumers’ lifestyles and dietary choices. Commercially,Therefore, we continue to:
offer reduced-, low- and no-calorie beverage options;
provide transparent nutrition information, featuring calories on the front of most of our packages;
provide our beverages in a range of packaging sizes; and
market responsibly, including no advertising targeted to children under 12.
The heritage of our Company is to lead, and innovation is critical for leadership. As such, we are resolute in continuing to innovate and are committed to partnering to find winning solutions in the area of noncaloric sweeteners. This includes working to reduce sugar and calories in many of our beverages. We want to be a more helpful and credible partner in the fight against obesity. Across the Coca-Cola system, we are mobilizing our assets in marketing and in community outreach to increase awareness and spur action.
Evolving Consumer Product Preferences
We are impacted by shifting consumer demographics and needs, on-the-go lifestyles and consumers who are empowered with more information than ever. As a consequence of these changes, many consumers want more beverage choices, personalization, a focus on sustainability and recyclability, and transparency related to our products and packaging. We are committed to meeting their needs and to generating new growth through our evolving portfolio of more than 500beverage brands and more than 4,300 beverage products (including more than 1,400numerous low- and no-calorie products), new product offerings,selectively expanding into other profitable categories of the commercial beverage industry, innovative and sustainable packaging, and ingredient education efforts. We are also committed to continuing to expand the variety of choices we provide to consumers and to providing options that reflect consumer concerns about impacts to ourthe planet.

Increased CompetitionEvolving Competitive Landscape and CapabilitiesCompeting in the Digital Marketplace
Our Company faces strong competition from well-established global companies as well as numerous regional and local companies. Additionally, the rapidly evolving digital landscape and growth of e-commerce in many markets has led to dramatic shifts in consumer shopping patternshabits and patterns. Consumers are rapidly embracing shopping via mobile device applications, e-commerce retailers and e-commerce websites or platforms, which presents new challenges to competitively maintain the competitiveness and relevancy of our brands. WeAs a result, we must continuously strengthen our capabilities in marketing and innovation in order to compete in a digital environment and maintain our brand loyalty and market share whileshare. In addition, we selectively expand into other profitable categories of the nonalcoholic beverage segment of the commercial beverage industry.are increasing our investments in e-commerce to support retail and meal delivery services, offering more package sizes that are fit-for-purpose for online sales, and shifting more consumer and trade promotions to digital.
34


Product Safety and Quality
We strive to meet the highest standards in both product safety and product quality. We are aware that some consumers have concerns and negative viewpoints regarding certain ingredients used in our products. The Coca-Cola system works every day to share safe and refreshing beverages with consumers around the world. We have rigorous product and ingredient safety and quality standards designed to ensure safety and quality in each of our products, and we drive innovation that provides new beverage options to meet consumers'satisfy consumers’ evolving needs and preferences. Across the Coca-Cola system, we take great care in an effort to ensure that every one of our beverages meets the highest standards for safety and quality.
We work to ensure consistent safety and quality through strong governance and compliance with applicable regulations and standards. We stay current with new regulations, industry best practices and marketplace conditions, and we engage with standard-setting and industry organizations. Additionally, we manufacture and distribute our products according to strict policies, requirements and specifications set forth in an integrated quality management program that continually measures all operations within the Coca-Cola system against the same stringent standards. Our quality management systemprogram also identifies and mitigates risks and drives improvement. In our quality laboratories, we stringently measure the quality attributes of ingredients as well as samples of finished products collected from the marketplace.
We perform due diligence to ensure that product and ingredient safety and quality standards are maintained in the more than 200 countries and territories where our products are sold. We regularly assess the relevance of our requirements and standards and continually work to improve and refine them across our entire supply chain.
Ingredient QualityEnvironmental and QuantitySocial Matters
WaterAs investors and stakeholders increasingly focus on ESG issues, our Company and companies across all industries are facing challenges and risks related to, among other things, environmental stewardship; social responsibility; diversity, equity and inclusion; and workplace rights. Where these challenges and risks relate to our business, we acknowledge that we have a role to play in developing and implementing solutions related to these important challenges. We have established specific ESG goals related to water quality and quantityscarcity; packaging materials used for our products; reduction of added sugar in our beverages; reduction of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas emissions; sustainable agriculture; diversity, equity and inclusion; and human and workplace rights. Our ability to achieve our ESG goals is an issue that requiresdependent on many factors, including, but not limited to, our Company's sustained attention and collaborationactions along with other companies,the actions of various stakeholders, such as our bottling partners, suppliers, governments, nongovernmental organizations, communities, and communities where we operate. Water is a main ingredient in substantiallyother third parties, all of our products, is vital to the production of the agricultural ingredients on which our business relies and is needed in our manufacturing process. It also is critical to the prosperity of the communities we serve. Water is a critical natural resource facing unprecedented challenges from overexploitation, increased food demand, increasing pollution, poor management and the effects of climate change.
Our Company regularly assesses the specific water-related risks that we and manyare outside of our bottling partners face and has implemented a formal water risk management program. Mitigation of water risk forms the basis of our water stewardship strategic framework. This strategy is executed at the local level where we operate and includes the following elements: water use efficiency and wastewater treatment in manufacturing operations; shared watershed protection efforts; engaging local communities; and addressing water resource management in our agricultural ingredient supply chain. Such efforts are conducted in collaboration and partnership with others and are intended to help address local needs. Many of these efforts help us in achieving our goal of replenishing the water that we and our bottling partners source and use in our finished products. We are also collaborating with other companies, governments, nongovernmental organizations and communities to advocate for needed water policy reforms and action to protect water availability and quality around the world.
Through these integrated programs, we believe that our Company can leverage the water-related knowledge we have developed in the communities we serve through source water availability assessments and planning, water resource management, water treatment, wastewater treatment systems and models for working with communities and partners in addressing water and sanitation needs. As demand for water continues to increase around the world, we expect continued action on our part to help with the successful long-term stewardship of this critical natural resource, both for our business and the communities we serve.
In addition, increased demand for commodities and decreased agricultural productivity in certain regions of the world as a result of changing weather patterns may limit the availability or increase the cost of key agricultural commodities, such as sugarcane, corn, sugar beets, citrus, coffee and tea, which are important sources of ingredients for our products and could impact the food security of communities around the world. We are dedicated to implementing our sustainable sourcing commitment, which is founded on principles that protect the environment, uphold workplace rights and help build more sustainable communities. To support this commitment, our programs focus on economic opportunity, with an emphasis on

female farmers, and environmental sustainability designed to help address these agricultural challenges. Through joint efforts with farmers, communities, bottlers, suppliers and key partners, as well as our increased and continued investment in sustainable agriculture, we can together help make a positive strategic impact on food security.
All of these challenges and risks — obesity; evolving consumer preferences; increased competition and capabilities in the marketplace; product safety and quality; and ingredient quality and quantity — have the potential to have a material adverse effect on the nonalcoholic beverage segment of the commercial beverage industry and on our Company; however, we believe our Company is well positioned to appropriately address these challenges and risks.control.
See also ''Item“Item 1A. Risk Factors''Factors” in Part I of this report for additional information about risks and uncertainties facing our Company.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States ("(“U.S. GAAP"GAAP”), which require management to make estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. We believe our most critical accounting policies and estimates relate to the following:
Principles of Consolidation
Recoverability of Current and Noncurrent Assets
Pension Plan Valuations
Revenue Recognition
Income Taxes
Management has discussed the development, selection and disclosure of critical accounting policies and estimates with the Audit Committee of the Company'sCompany’s Board of Directors. While our estimates and assumptions are based on our knowledge of current events and actions we may undertake in the future, actual results may ultimately differ from these estimates and assumptions. For a discussion of the Company'sCompany’s significant accounting policies, refer to Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Certain prior year amounts in Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations have been revised to conform to the current year presentation as a result of the adoption of certain accounting standards that became effective January 1, 2018, as applicable. Refer to Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further details.Statements.
Principles of Consolidation
Our Company consolidates all entities that we control by ownership of a majority voting interest. Additionally, there are situations in which consolidation is required even though the usual condition of consolidation (ownership of a majority voting interest) does not apply. Generally, this occurs when an entity holds an interest in another business enterprise that was achieved through arrangements that do not involve voting interests, which results in a disproportionate relationship between such entity'sentity’s voting interests in, and its exposure to the economic risks and potential rewards of, the other business enterprise. This disproportionate relationship results in what is known as a variable interest, and the entity in which we have the another entity holds a
35


variable interest is referred to as a "VIE."“VIE.” An enterprise must consolidate a VIE if it is determined to be the primary beneficiary of the VIE. The primary beneficiary has both (1) the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the entity'sentity’s economic performance and (2) the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE.
Our Company holds interests in certain VIEs, primarily bottling operations, for which we were not determined to be the primary beneficiary. Our variable interests in these VIEs primarily relate to equity investments, profit guarantees or subordinated financial support. Refer to Note 1211 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Although these financial arrangements resulted in our holding variable interests in these entities, they did not empower us to direct the activities of the VIEs that most significantly impact the VIEs'VIEs’ economic performance. Our Company's investments, plus any loans and guarantees, and other subordinated financial support related to these VIEs totaled $3,916 million and $4,523 million as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, representing our maximum exposures to loss. The Company's investments, plus any loans and guarantees, related to these VIEs were not individually significant to the Company's consolidated financial statements.
In addition, our Company holds interests in certain VIEs, primarily bottling operations, for which we were determined to be the primary beneficiary. As a result, we have consolidated these entities. Our Company's investments, plus any loans and

guarantees, related to these VIEs totaled $49 million and $1 million as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, representing our maximum exposures to loss. The assets and liabilities of VIEs for which we are the primary beneficiary were not significant to the Company's consolidated financial statements.
Creditors of our VIEs do not have recourse against the general credit of the Company, regardless of whether theythe VIEs are accounted for as consolidated entities.
We use the equity method to account for investments in companies if our investment provides us with the ability to exercise significant influence over the operating and financial policies of the investee. Our consolidated net income includes our Company'sCompany’s proportionate share of the net income or loss of these companies. Our judgment regarding the level of influence over each equity method investee includes considering key factors such as our ownership interest, representation on the board of directors, participation in policy-making decisions and material intercompany transactions.
We eliminate from our financial results all significant intercompany transactions, including the intercompany transactions with consolidated VIEs and the intercompany portion of transactions with equity method investees.
Recoverability of Current and Noncurrent Assets
Our Company faces many uncertainties and risks related to various economic, political and regulatory environments in the countries in which we operate, particularly in developing and emerging markets. Refer to the heading "Our“Our Business — Challenges and Risks"Risks” above and "Item“Item 1A. Risk Factors"Factors” in Part I of this report. As a result, management must make numerous assumptions, which involve a significant amount of judgment, when completingperforming recoverability and impairment tests of current and noncurrent assets in various regions around the world.
We perform recoverability and impairment tests of current and noncurrent assets in accordance with U.S. GAAP. For certain assets, recoverability and/or impairment tests are required only when conditions exist that indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. For other assets, impairment tests are required at least annually, or more frequently if events or circumstances indicate that an asset may be impaired.
The performance of recoverability and impairment tests of current and noncurrent assets involves critical accounting estimates. These estimates require significant management judgment, include inherent uncertainties and are often interdependent; therefore, they do not change in isolation. Factors that management must estimate include, among others, the economic lives of the assets, sales volume, pricing, royalty rates, cost of raw materials, delivery costs, the impact of any supply chain disruptions, inflation, long-term growth rates, cost of capital, marketing spending, foreign currency exchange rates, tax rates, capital spending, proceeds from the sale of assets and customers’ financial condition. These factors are even more difficult to estimate as a result of uncertainties associated with the scope, severity and duration of the global COVID-19 pandemic and any resurgences of the pandemic, including, but not limited to, the number of people contracting the virus; the impact of shelter-in-place and social distancing requirements; the impact of governmental actions across the globe to contain the virus; vaccine availability, rates of vaccination and effectiveness of vaccines against existing and new variants of the virus; governmental or other vaccine mandates and any associated business and supply chain disruptions; and the substance and pace of the economic recovery. The estimates we use when performing recoverability tests of assets are consistent with those we use in our internal planning. When performing impairment tests, we estimate the fair values of the assets using management’s best assumptions, which we believe are consistent with those a market participant would use. The variability of these factors depends on a number of conditions, including uncertainties associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, and thus our accounting estimates may change from period to period. While uncertainties still exist, we expect to see continued improvements in our business as vaccines become more widely available, as vaccination rates increase, and as consumers return to many of their previous work routines as well as socializing and traveling. The Company has certain intangible and other long-lived assets that are more dependent on cash flows generated in the away-from-home channels and/or that generate cash flows in geographic areas that are more heavily impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic and are therefore more susceptible to impairment. In addition, intangible and other long-lived assets we acquired in recent transactions are naturally more susceptible to impairment, because they are recorded at fair value based on recent operating plans and macroeconomic conditions at the time of acquisition. If we had used other assumptions and estimates when tests of these assets were performed, impairment charges could have resulted. Furthermore, if management uses different assumptions in future periods, or if different conditions exist in future periods, impairment charges could result. The total future impairment charges we may be required to record could be material. Refer to Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of recent acquisitions. Refer to Note 16 of Notes to Consolidated Financial
36


Statements for the discussion of impairment charges. Refer to the heading “Operations Review” below for additional information related to our present business environment.
As of December 31, 2021, the carrying value of our investment in Coca-Cola Bottlers Japan Holdings Inc. (“CCBJHI”) exceeded its fair value by $87 million, or 18 percent. Based on the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than our carrying value and our intent and ability to retain the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in market value, management determined that the decline in fair value was temporary in nature. Therefore, we did not record an impairment charge related to the investment.
Our equity method investees also perform such recoverability and/orand impairment tests. If an impairment charge is recorded by one of our equity method investees, the Company records its proportionate share of such charge as a reduction of equity income (loss) — net in our consolidated statement of income. However, the actual amount we record with respect to our proportionate share of such chargescharge may be impacted by items such as basis differences, deferred taxes and deferred gains.
The assessment of recoverability and the performance of impairment tests of current and noncurrent assets involve critical accounting estimates. These estimates require significant management judgment, include inherent uncertainties and are often interdependent; therefore, they do not change in isolation. Factors that management must estimate include, among others, the economic life of the asset, sales volume, pricing, cost of raw materials, delivery costs, inflation, cost of capital, marketing spending, foreign currency exchange rates, tax rates, capital spending and proceeds from the sale of assets. These factors are even more difficult to predict when global financial markets are highly volatile. The estimates we use when assessing the recoverability of current and noncurrent assets are consistent with those we use in our internal planning. When performing impairment tests, we estimate the fair values of the assets using management's best assumptions, which we believe would be consistent with what a hypothetical marketplace participant would use. Estimates and assumptions used in these tests are evaluated and updated as appropriate. The variability of these factors depends on a number of conditions, including uncertainty about future events, and thus our accounting estimates may change from period to period. If other assumptions and estimates had been used when these tests were performed, impairment charges could have resulted. As mentioned above, these factors do not change in isolation and, therefore, we do not believe it is practicable or meaningful to present the impact of changing a single factor. Furthermore, if management uses different assumptions or if different conditions occur in future periods, future impairment charges could result. Refer to the heading "Operations Review" below for additional information related to our present business environment. Certain factors discussed above are impacted by our current business environment and are discussed throughout this report, as appropriate.
Investments in Equity and Debt Securities
Effective January 1, 2018, we adopted Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") Financial Instruments Overall: Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities ("ASU 2016-01"), which requires us toWe measure all equity investments that do not result in consolidation and are not accounted for under the equity method at fair value and recognize any changeswith the change in earnings.fair value included in net income. We use quoted market prices to determine the fair valuesvalue of equity securities with readily determinable fair values. For equity securities without readily determinable fair values, we have elected the measurement alternative under which we measure these investments at cost minus impairment, if any, plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions for the identical or a similar investment of the same issuer. Management assesses each of these investments on an individual basis. We recognized a cumulative effect adjustment of $409 million, net of tax, to increase the

opening balance of reinvested earnings with an offset to accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) ("AOCI") as of January 1, 2018 in connection with the adoption of ASU 2016-01. Refer to Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-01, marketable equity securities not accounted for under the equity method were classified as either trading or available-for-sale. Both realized and unrealized gains and losses on equity securities classified as trading securities were recognized in net income. For equity securities classified as available-for-sale, realized gains and losses were included in net income. Unrealized gains and losses on equity securities classified as available-for-sale were recognized in AOCI, net of tax. Equity securities without readily determinable fair values were recorded at cost.
Our investments in debt securities are carried at either amortized cost or fair value. The cost basis is determined by the specific identification method. Investments in debt securities that the Company has the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity are carried at amortized cost and classified as held-to-maturity. Investments in debt securities that are not classified as held-to-maturity are carried at fair value and classified as either trading or available-for-sale. Realized and unrealized gains and losses on trading debt securities as well as realized gains and losses on available-for-sale debt securities are included in net income. Unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, on available-for-sale debt securities are included in our consolidated balance sheet as a component of AOCI,accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), except for the changechanges in fair valuevalues attributable to the currency risk being hedged, if applicable, which isare included in net income.
The following table presents the carrying values of our investments in equity and debt securities (in millions):
December 31, 2018
Carrying
Value

 
Percentage
of Total
Assets

Equity method investments$19,407
 23%
Debt securities classified as available-for-sale4,993
 6
Equity securities with readily determinable fair values1,934
 2
Debt securities classified as trading44
 *
Equity securities without readily determinable fair values80
 *
Total$26,458
 32%
*
Accounts for less than 1 percent of the Company's total assets.
Equity securities with readily determinable fair values that are not accounted for under the equity method and debt securities classified as trading are not assessed for impairment, since they are carried at fair value with the change in fair value included in net income. Similarly, prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-01, equity investments classified as trading were not tested for impairment. Equity method investments, equity securities without readily determinable fair values and debt securities classified as available-for-sale or held-to-maturity are and prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-01 equity securities classified as available-for-sale and cost method investments were, reviewed each reporting period to determine whether a significant event or change in circumstances has occurred that may have an adverse effect on the fair value of each investment. When such events or changes occur, we evaluate the fair value compared to our cost basis in the investment. We also perform this evaluation every reporting period for each investment for which our cost basis has exceeded the fair value. The fair values of most of our Company'sCompany’s investments in publicly traded companies are often readily available based on quoted market prices. For investments in nonpublicly traded companies, management'smanagement’s assessment of fair value is based on valuation methodologies including discounted cash flows, estimates of sales proceeds and appraisals, as appropriate. We consider the assumptions that we believe hypothetical marketplace participantsa market participant would use in evaluating estimated future cash flows when employing the discounted cash flow or estimates of sales proceeds valuation methodologies. The ability to accurately predict future cash flows, especially in emerging and developing markets, may impact the determination of fair value. In the event the fair value of an investment declines below our cost basis, management is required to determine if the decline in fair value is other than temporary. If management determines the decline is other than temporary, an impairment charge is recorded. Management'sManagement’s assessment as to the nature of a decline in fair value is based on, among other things, the length of time and the extent to which the market value has been less than our cost basis; the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer; and our intent and ability to retain the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in market value.
During 2018 and 2017, we recognized other-than-temporary impairment charges related to certain of our equity method investees of $591 million and $50 million, respectively. Refer to Note 17 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.



The following table presents the difference between calculated fair values, based on quoted closing prices of publicly traded shares, and our Company's cost basis in investments in publicly traded companies accounted for under the equity method (in millions):
December 31, 2018
Fair
Value

 
Carrying
Value

 Difference
Monster Beverage Corporation$5,026
 $3,573
 $1,453
Coca-Cola European Partners plc4,033
 3,551
 482
Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V.3,401
 1,714
 1,687
Coca-Cola HBC AG2,681
 1,260
 1,421
Coca-Cola Amatil Limited1,325
 656
 669
Coca-Cola Bottlers Japan Holdings Inc.1
978
 1,142
 (164)
Embotelladora Andina S.A.497
 263
 234
Coca–Cola Consolidated, Inc.2
440
 138
 302
Coca-Cola İçecek A.Ş.299
 174
 125
Total$18,680
 $12,471
 $6,209
1The carrying value of our investment in Coca-Cola Bottlers Japan Holdings Inc. ("CCBJHI") exceeded its fair value as of December 31, 2018. Based on the length of time and the extent to which the market value has been less than our cost basis and our intent and ability to retain the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in market value, management determined that the decline in fair value was temporary in nature. Therefore, we did not record an impairment charge.
2Formerly known as Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated.
Other Assets
Our Company invests in infrastructure programs with our bottlers that are directed at strengthening our bottling system and increasing unit case volume. Additionally, our Company advances payments to certain customers for distribution rights as well as to fund future marketing activities intended to generate profitable volume, and we expense such payments over the periods benefited. Payments under these programs are generally capitalized and reported in the line item prepaid expenses and other assets or other assets, as appropriate, in our consolidated balance sheet. When facts and circumstances indicate that the carrying value of these assets or asset groups may not be recoverable, management assesses the recoverability of the carrying value by preparing estimates of sales volume and the resulting gross profit and cash flows. These estimated future cash flows are consistent with those we use in our internal planning. If the sum of the expected future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) is less than the carrying amount, we recognize an impairment loss. The impairment loss recognized is the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair value. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $19 million related to CCR's other assets. Refer to Note 17 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Property, Plant and Equipment
As of December 31, 2018, the carrying value of our property, plant and equipment, net of depreciation, was $8,232 million, or 10 percent of our total assets. Certain events or changes in circumstances may indicate that the recoverability of the carrying amount or remaining useful life of property, plant and equipment should be assessed, including, among others, the manner or length of time in which the Company intends to use the asset, a significant decrease in market value, a significant change in the business climate in a particular market, or a current period operating or cash flow loss combined with historical losses and/or projected future losses. When such events or changes in circumstances are present and an impairmenta recoverability test is performed, we estimate the future cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset or asset group and its eventual disposition. These estimated future cash flows are consistent with those we use in our internal planning. If the sum of the expected future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) is less than the carrying amount, we recognize an impairment loss.charge. The impairment loss charge
37


recognized is the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair value. We use a variety of methodologies to determine the fair value of property, plant and equipment, including appraisals and discounted cash flow models. These appraisals and models whichinclude assumptions we believe are consistent with the assumptions we believethose a hypothetical marketplacemarket participant would use. During the year ended December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Company recorded impairment charges of $312 million and $310 million, respectively, related to CCR's property, plant and equipment. Refer to Note 17 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


Goodwill, Trademarks and Other Intangible Assets
Intangible assets are classified into one of three categories: (1) intangible assets with definite lives subject to amortization; (2) intangible assets with indefinite lives not subject to amortization; and (3) goodwill. For intangible assets with definite lives, recoverability tests for impairment must be performed if conditions exist that indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. For intangible assets with indefinite lives and goodwill, impairment tests for impairment must be performed at least annually, or more frequently if events or circumstances indicate that an asset may be impaired.
The following table presents the carrying values of intangible assets included in our consolidated balance sheet (in millions):
December 31, 2018
Carrying
Value

 
Percentage
of Total
Assets

Goodwill$10,263
 12%
Trademarks with indefinite lives6,682
 8
Bottlers' franchise rights with indefinite lives51
 *
Definite-lived intangible assets, net168
 *
Other intangible assets not subject to amortization106
 *
Total$17,270
 21%
*
Accounts for less than 1 percent of the Company's total assets.
The assessmentperformance of recoverability and the performance of impairment tests of intangible assets involveinvolves critical accounting estimates. These estimates require significant management judgment, include inherent uncertainties and are often interdependent; therefore, they do not change in isolation. Factors that management must estimate include, among others, the economic lifelives of the asset,assets, sales volume, pricing, royalty rates, cost of raw materials, delivery costs, the impact of any supply chain disruptions, inflation, long-term growth rates, cost of capital, marketing spending, foreign currency exchange rates, tax rates, capital spending, and proceeds from the sale of assets.assets and customers’ financial condition. These factors are even more difficult to predict when global financial markets are highly volatile. The estimates we use when assessing theperforming recoverability tests of intangible assets are consistent with those we use in our internal planning. When performing impairment tests, we estimate the fair values of the assets using management'smanagement’s best assumptions, which we believe would beare consistent with whatthose a hypothetical marketplacemarket participant would use. EstimatesThe estimates and assumptions used in these tests are evaluated and updated as appropriate. The variability of these factors depends on a number of conditions, including uncertainty about future events, and thus our accounting estimates may change from period to period. If other assumptions and estimates had been used when these tests were performed, impairment charges could have resulted. As mentioned above, these factors do not change in isolation and, therefore, we do not believe it is practicable or meaningful to present the impact of changing a single factor. Furthermore, if management uses different assumptions in future periods or if different conditions exist in future periods, future impairment charges could result. Refer to the heading "Operations Review"“Operations Review” below for additional information related to our present business environment. Certain factors discussed above are impacted by our current business environment and are discussed throughout this report, as appropriate.
Intangible assets acquired in recent transactions are naturally more susceptible to impairment, primarily due to the fact thatbecause they are recorded at fair value based on recent operating plans and macroeconomic conditions present at the time of acquisition. Consequently, if operating results and/or macroeconomic conditions deteriorate shortly after an acquisition, it could result in the impairment of the acquired assets. A deterioration of macroeconomic conditions may not only negatively impact the estimated operating cash flows used in our cash flow models but may also negatively impact other assumptions used in our analyses, including, but not limited to, the estimated cost of capital and/or discount rates. Additionally, as discussed above, in accordance with U.S. GAAP, we are required to ensure that the assumptions used to determine fair value in our analyses are consistent with the assumptions that we believe a hypothetical marketplacemarket participant would use. As a result, the cost of capital and/or discount rates used in our analyses may increase or decrease based on market conditions and trends, regardless of whether our Company'sCompany’s actual cost of capital has changed. Therefore, if the cost of capital and/or discount rates change, our Company may recognize an impairment of an intangible asset in spite of realizing actual cash flows that are approximately equal to, or greater than, our previously forecasted amounts.
We perform impairment tests of goodwill at our reporting unit level, which is generally one level below our operating segments. Our operating segments are primarily based on geographic responsibility, which is consistent with the way management runs our business. Our geographic operating segments are generally subdivided into smaller geographic regions. These geographic regions or territories that we sometimes refer to as "business units." These business units are also our reporting units. Our Global Ventures operating segment includes the results of our Costa, innocent and doğadan businesses as well as fees earned pursuant to distribution coordination agreements between the Company and Monster, each of which is its own reporting unit. The Bottling Investments operating segment includes all Company-owned orof our consolidated bottling operations, regardless of geographic location. Generally, each Company-owned or consolidated bottling operation within our Bottling Investments operating segment is its own reporting unit. Goodwill is assigned to the reporting unit or units that benefit from the synergies arising from each business combination.

In order to test for goodwill impairment, the Company compares the fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying value, including goodwill. If the fair value of the reporting unit is lowerless than its carrying amount, goodwill is written down for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit'sunit’s fair value. However, the lossimpairment charge recognized cannot exceed the carrying amount of goodwill. We typically use discounted cash flow models to determine the fair value of a reporting unit. The assumptions used in these models are consistent with those we believe a hypothetical marketplacemarket participant would use. The Company has the option to perform a qualitative assessment of goodwill rather than completing the impairment test. The Company must assess whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If the Company concludes that this is the case, it must perform the impairment testing discussed above. Otherwise, the Company does not need to perform any further assessment.
38


When facts andevents or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of definite-lived intangible assets may not be recoverable, management assesses theperforms a recoverability test of the carrying value by preparing estimates of sales volume and the resulting gross profit and cash flows. These estimated future cash flows are consistent with those we use in our internal planning. If the sum of the expected future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) is less than the carrying amount of the asset or asset group, we recognize an impairment loss.charge. The impairment losscharge recognized is the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair value. We use a variety of methodologies to determine the fair value of these assets, including discounted cash flow models. These models whichinclude assumptions we believe are consistent with the assumptions we believe hypothetical marketplace participantsthose a market participant would use.
We test indefinite-lived intangible assets, including trademarks, franchise rights and goodwill, for impairment annually, or more frequently if events or circumstances indicate that an asset may be impaired. Our Company performs these annual impairment tests as of the first day of our third fiscal quarter. We use a variety of methodologies in conducting impairment assessmentstests of indefinite-lived intangible assets, including, but not limited to, discounted cash flow models. These models which are based on theinclude assumptions we believe hypothetical marketplace participantsare consistent with those a market participant would use. For indefinite-lived intangible assets, other than goodwill, if the carrying amount exceeds the fair value, an impairment charge is recognized in an amount equal to that excess. The Company has the option to perform a qualitative assessment of indefinite-lived intangible assets, other than goodwill, rather than completing the impairment test. The Company must assess whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of the intangible asset is less than its carrying amount. If the Company concludes that this is the case, it must perform the impairment testing described above. Otherwise, the Company does not need to perform any further assessment.
During 2018, the Company recorded impairment charges of $138 million related to certain intangible assets. These charges included $100 million related to bottlers' franchise rights with indefinite lives and $38 million related to definite-lived intangible assets. Refer to Note 17 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
During 2017, the Company recorded impairment charges of $457 million related to certain intangible assets. These charges included $390 million related to goodwill and $33 million related to bottlers' franchise rights with indefinite lives. As a result of these charges, the carrying value of CCR's goodwill is zero. Additionally, we recorded impairment charges of $34 million related to Venezuelan intangible assets. As a result of these charges, the carrying value of these assets is zero. Refer to Note 17 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
During 2016, the Company recorded charges of $153 million related to certain intangible assets. These charges included $143 million related to the impairment of certain U.S. bottlers' franchise rights and $10 million related to the impairment of goodwill. Refer to Note 17 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Pension Plan Valuations
Our Company sponsors and/or contributes to pension and postretirement health care and life insurance benefit plans covering substantially all U.S. employees. We also sponsor nonqualified, unfunded defined benefit pension plans for certain associates and participate in multi-employer pension plansemployees in the United States. In addition, our Company and its subsidiaries have various pension plans and other forms of postretirement arrangements outside the United States.
Management is required to make certain critical estimates related to the actuarial assumptions used to determine our net periodic pension expensecost or income and pension obligations. We believe the most critical assumptions are related to (1) the discount rate used to determine the present value of the liabilities and (2) the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets. All of ourOur actuarial assumptions are reviewed annually, or more frequently to the extent that a settlement or curtailment occurs. Changes in these assumptions could have a material impact on the measurement of our net periodic pension expensecost or income and pension obligations.
At each measurement date, we determine the discount rate primarily by reference to rates of high-quality, long-term corporate bonds that mature in a pattern similar to the future benefit payments we anticipate making under the plans.
As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the weighted-average discount rate used to compute our pension obligations was 4.00 percent and 3.50 percent, respectively.

The Company measures the service cost and interest cost components of net periodic benefitpension cost for pension and other postretirement benefit plansor income by applying the specific spot rates along the yield curve to the plans'plans’ projected cash flows.
The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets is based upon the long-term outlook of our investment strategy as well as our historical returns and volatilities for each asset class. We also review current levels of interest rates and inflation to assess the reasonableness of our expected long-term rates.rates of return on plan assets. Our pension plan investment objective for our pension assets is to ensure all of ourfunded pension plans have sufficient fundsassets to meet their benefit obligations when they become due. As a result, the Company periodically revises asset allocations, where appropriate, to seek to improve returns and manage risk. The weighted-average expected long-term rate of return used to calculate our pension expense was 8.00 percent, 8.00 percent and 8.25 percent in 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

In 2018,2021, the Company'sCompany’s total pension expenseincome related to defined benefit pension plans was $145$61 million, which included $107 million of net periodic benefitpension income of $180 million and $252net charges of $119 million of settlement charges, curtailment chargesrelated to settlements, curtailments and special termination benefit costs.benefits. In 2019,2022, we expect our totalnet periodic pension income to be approximately $11$188 million. We currently do not expect to incur any settlement charges or special termination benefit costsThe increase in 2019. The decrease in 20192022 expected net periodic benefitpension income is primarily due to unfavorable asset performance in 2018, partially offset by an increase in the weighted-average discount rate atDecember 31, 20182021 compared to December 31, 2017.2020, favorable asset performance in 2021 and a reduction in the number of plan participants arising from our strategic realignment initiatives, partially offset by a decrease in the expected weighted-average long-term rate of return on plan assets assumption. The estimated impact of a 50 basis-point decrease in the discount rate would result in a $19$17 million decrease in our 20192022 net periodic benefitpension income. Additionally, the estimated impact of a 50 basis-point decrease in the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets would result in a $23$26 million decrease in our 20192022 net periodic benefitpension income.
The sensitivity information provided above is based only on changes to the actuarial assumptions used for our U.S. pension plans. As of December 31, 2018,2021, the Company'sCompany’s primary U.S. pension plan represented 6261 percent and 57 percent of both the Company'sCompany’s consolidated projected benefit obligation and pension plan assets.assets, respectively. Refer to Note 1413 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information about our pension plans and related actuarial assumptions.
39


Revenue Recognition
Effective January 1, 2018, we adopted Accounting Standards Codification 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers ("ASC 606"). Refer to Note 3 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Revenue is recognized when performance obligations under the terms of the contracts with our customers are satisfied. Our performance obligation generally consists of the promise to sell concentrates, syrups or finished products to our bottling partners, wholesalers, distributors or retailers. Control of the concentrates, syrups or finished products is transferred upon shipment to, or receipt at, our customers'customers’ locations, as determined by the specific terms of the contract. OnceUpon transfer of control is transferred to the customer, we have completedwhich completes our performance obligation, and revenue is recognized. Our sales terms generally do not allow for a right of return except for matters related to any manufacturing defects on our part. After completion of our performance obligation, we have an unconditional right to consideration as outlined in the contract. Our receivables will generally be collected in less than six months, in accordance with the underlying payment terms. All of our performance obligations under the terms of contracts with our customers have an original duration of one year or less.
Our customers and bottling partners may be entitled to cash discounts, funds for promotional and marketing activities, volume‑based incentive programs, support for infrastructure programs and other similar programs. In somemost markets, in an effort to allow our Company and our bottling partners to grow together through shared value, aligned financial objectives and the flexibility necessary to meet consumers'consumers’ always changing needs and tastes, we work with our bottling partners to develop and implementhave implemented an incidence-based concentrate pricing model. Under this model, the concentrate price we charge is impacted by a number of factors, including, but not limited to, bottler pricing, the channels in which the finished products produced from the concentrateconcentrates are sold, and package mix. The amounts associated with the arrangements described above are defined asrepresent variable consideration, under ASC 606 and an estimate of which is included in the transaction price as a component of net operating revenues in our consolidated statement of income upon completion of our performance obligations. The total revenue recorded, including any variable consideration, cannot exceed the amount for which it is probable that a significant reversal will not occur when uncertainties related to variability are resolved. As a result, we are recognizing revenue based on our faithful depiction of the consideration that we expect to receive. In making our estimates of variable consideration, we consider past results and make significant assumptions related to: (1) customer sales volumes; (2) customer ending inventories; (3) customer selling price per unit; (4) selling channels; and (5) discount rates, rebates and other pricing allowances, as applicable. In gathering data to estimate our variable consideration, we generally calculate our estimates using a portfolio approach at the country and product line level rather than at the individual contract level. The result of making these estimates will impact the line items trade accounts receivable and accounts payable and accrued expenses in our consolidated balance sheet. The actual amounts ultimately paid and/or received may be different from our estimates.
Prior to the adoption of ASC 606, we recognized revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement existed, delivery of products had occurred, the sales price was fixed or determinable and collectibility was reasonably assured. For our Company, this generally meant that we recognized revenue when title to our products was transferred to our bottling partners, resellers or

other customers. Title usually transferred upon shipment to or receipt at our customers' locations, as determined by the specific sales terms of each transaction. Our sales terms did not allow for a right of return except for matters related to any manufacturing defects on our part. Our customers could earn certain incentives which were included in deductions from revenue, a component of net operating revenues in our consolidated statement of income. These incentives included, but were not limited to, cash discounts, funds for promotional and marketing activities, volume-based incentive programs and support for infrastructure programs. In preparing the financial statements, management made estimates related to the contractual terms, customer performance and sales volume to determine the total amounts recorded as deductions from revenue. Management also considered past results in making such estimates. The actual amounts ultimately paid may have been different from our estimates. Such differences were recorded once they were determined and historically were not significant. Refer to Note 3 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
Income Taxes
Our annual effective tax rate is based on our income and the tax laws in the various jurisdictions in which we operate. Significant judgment is required in determining our annual income tax expense and in evaluating our tax positions. We establish reserves to remove some or all of the tax benefit of any of our tax positions at the time we determine that the position becomes uncertain based upon one of the following conditions: (1) the tax position is not "more“more likely than not"not” to be sustained; (2) the tax position is "more“more likely than not"not” to be sustained, but for a lesser amount; or (3) the tax position is "more“more likely than not"not” to be sustained, but not in the financial period in which the tax position was originally taken. For purposes of evaluating whether or not a tax position is uncertain, (1) we presume the tax position will be examined by the relevant taxing authority that has full knowledge of all relevant information; (2) the technical merits of a tax position are derived from authorities such as legislation and statutes, legislative intent, regulations, rulings and case lawcaselaw and their applicability to the facts and circumstances of the tax position; and (3) each tax position is evaluated without considerationsconsideration of the possibility of offset or aggregation with other tax positions taken. We adjust these reserves, including any impact on the related interest and penalties, in light of changing facts and circumstances, such as the progress of a tax audit. Refer to the heading "Operations“Operations Review — Income Taxes"Taxes” below and Note 1514 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
On September 17, 2015, the Company received a Statutory Notice of Deficiency ("Notice") from the IRS for the tax years 2007 through 2009, after a five-year audit. In the Notice, the IRS claimed that the Company's United States taxable income should be increased by an amount that creates a potential additional federal income tax liability of approximately $3.3 billion for the period, plus interest. No penalties were asserted in the Notice. The disputed amounts largely relate to a transfer pricing matter involving the appropriate amount of taxable income the Company should report in the United States in connection with its licensing of intangible property to certain related foreign licensees regarding the manufacturing, distribution, sale, marketing and promotion of products in overseas markets.

During the 2007-2009 audit period, the Company followed the same transfer pricing methodology for these licenses that had consistently been followed since the methodology was agreed with the IRS in a 1996 closing agreement that applied back to 1987. The closing agreement provided prospective penalty protection conditioned on the Company's continued adherence to the prescribed methodology absent change in material facts and circumstances and relevant federal tax law. Although the IRS subsequently asserted, without explanation, that material facts and circumstances and relevant federal tax law had changed, it has not asserted penalties. The Company's compliance with the closing agreement was audited and confirmed by the IRS in five successive audit cycles covering the subsequent 11 years through 2006, with the last audit concluding as recently as 2009.

The Notice represents a repudiation of the methodology previously adopted in the 1996 closing agreement. The IRS designated the matter for litigation on October 15, 2015. To the extent the matter remains designated, the Company will be prevented from pursuing any administrative settlement at IRS Appeals or under the IRS Advance Pricing and Mutual Agreement Program.

The Company firmly believes that the IRS' claims are without merit and is pursuing, and will continue to pursue, all available administrative and judicial remedies necessary to vigorously defend its position. To that end, the Company filed a petition in the U.S. Tax Court on December 14, 2015, and the IRS filed its answer on February 12, 2016. On October 4, 2017, the IRS filed an amended answer to the Company's petition in which it increased its transfer pricing adjustment by $385 million resulting in an additional tax adjustment of $135 million.

On June 20, 2017, the Company filed a motion for summary judgment on the portion of the IRS' adjustments related to our licensee in Mexico. On December 14, 2017, the U.S. Tax Court issued a decision on the summary judgment motion in favor of the Company. This decision effectively reduced the IRS' potential tax adjustment by approximately $138 million.

The U.S. Tax Court trial was held from March 8, 2018 through May 11, 2018. The Company and the IRS filed and exchanged final post-trial briefs in February 2019. It is not known how much time will elapse thereafter prior to the issuance of the Court's

decision. In the interim, or subsequent to the Tax Court's decision, the IRS may propose similar adjustments for years subsequent to the 2007-2009 litigation period. While the Company continues to strongly disagree with the IRS' position, there is no assurance that the U.S. Tax Court will rule in the Company's favor, and it is possible that all or some portion of the adjustment proposed by the IRS Notice ultimately could be sustained. In that event, the Company will be subject to significant additional liabilities for the years at issue and potentially also for subsequent periods, which could have a material adverse impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
The Company regularly assesses the likelihood of adverse outcomes resulting from tax disputes such as this and other examinations for all open years to determine the adequacy of its tax reserves. Any such adjustments related to years prior to 2018, either in the litigation period or later, may have an impact on the transition tax payable as part of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017.
A number of years may elapse before a particular uncertain tax position is audited and finally resolved. The number of years subject to tax audits or tax assessments varies depending on the tax jurisdiction. The tax benefit that has been previously reserved because of a failure to meet the "more“more likely than not"not�� recognition threshold would be recognized in our income tax expense in the first interim period when the uncertainty disappears under any one of the following conditions: (1) the tax position is "more“more likely than not"not” to be sustained; (2) the tax position, amount, and/or timing is ultimately settled through negotiation or litigation; or (3) the statute of limitations for the tax position has expired. Settlement of any particular issue would usually require the use of cash. Refer to Note 11 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Tax law requireslaws require certain items to be included in the tax return at different times than when these items are reflected in the consolidated financial statements. As a result, the annual effective tax rate reflected in our consolidated financial statements is different from that reported in our tax return (our cash tax rate). Some of these differences are permanent, such as expenses that are not deductible in our tax return, and some differences reverse over time, such as depreciation expense. These timing differences create deferred tax assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on temporary
40


differences between the financial reportingbook basis and tax basesbasis of assets and liabilities. The tax rates used to determine deferred tax assets or liabilities are the enacted tax rates in effect for the year and for the manner in which the differences are expected to reverse. Based on the evaluation of all available information, the Company recognizes future tax benefits, such as net operating loss carryforwards, to the extent that realizing these benefits is considered more likely than not.
We evaluate our ability to realize the tax benefits associated with deferred tax assets by analyzing our forecasted taxable income using both historical and projected future operating results; the reversal of existing taxable temporary differences; taxable income in prior carryback years (if permitted); and the availability of tax planning strategies. A valuation allowance is required to be established unless management determines that it is more likely than not that the Company will ultimately realize the tax benefit associated with a deferred tax asset. As of December 31, 2018, the Company's valuation allowances on deferred tax assets were $399 million and were primarily related to uncertainties regarding the future realization of recorded tax benefits on tax loss carryforwards generated in various jurisdictions. Current evidence does not suggest we will realize sufficient taxable income of the appropriate character within the carryforward period to allow us to realize these deferred tax benefits. If we were to identify and implement tax planning strategies to recover these deferred tax assets or generate sufficient income of the appropriate character in these jurisdictions in the future, it could lead to the reversal of these valuation allowances and a reduction of income tax expense. The Company believes it will generate sufficient future taxable income to realize the tax benefits related to the remaining deferred tax assets in our consolidated balance sheet.
The Company does not record a U.S. deferred tax liability for the excess of the book basis over the tax basis of its investments in foreign subsidiaries to the extent that the basis difference which primarily results from earnings, meets the indefinite reversal criteria. These criteria are met if the foreign subsidiary has invested, or will invest, the undistributed earnings indefinitely. The decision as to the amount of undistributed earnings that the Company intends to maintain in non-U.S. subsidiaries takes into account items including, but not limited to, forecasts and budgets of financial needs of cash for working capital, liquidity plans, capital improvement programs, merger and acquisition plans, and planned loans to other non-U.S. subsidiaries. The Company also evaluates its expected cash requirements in the United States. Other factors that can influence that determination are local restrictions on remittances (for example, in some countries a central bank application and approval are required in order for the Company'sCompany’s local country subsidiary to pay a dividend), economic stability and asset risk. Refer to Note 1514 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
The Tax Reform Act was signed into law on December 22, 2017. Among other things, the Tax Reform Act reduces the U.S. federal corporate tax rate from 35.0 percent to 21.0 percent effective for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, transitions the U.S. method of taxation from a worldwide tax system to a modified territorial system and requires companies to pay a one-time transition tax over a period of eight years on the mandatory deemed repatriation of prescribed foreign earnings as of December 31, 2017. The one-time transition tax is based on our total accumulated post-1986 prescribed foreign earnings and profits ("E&P") of approximately $41 billion. Most of this amount comprises unremitted foreign earnings, upon which no

U.S. federal or state income tax had been accrued, because they were considered to have been indefinitely reinvested. At December 31, 2017, following enactment of the Tax Reform Act, we recorded a provisional $4.6 billion tax reflecting our best estimate of the one-time deemed repatriation tax liability as of December 31, 2017, and a $0.6 billion provisional deferred tax liability related to foreign withholding taxes and state income taxes on earnings no longer considered to be indefinitely reinvested.  
During 2018, we recorded a net tax expense from the impact of the Tax Reform Act. As permitted by SAB 118, we had recorded provisional adjustments to our reasonable estimate of the impact of the Tax Reform Act during the 2018 measurement period pursuant to our analysis of contemporaneous guidance, interpretations and data, and we have finalized that analysis based on such information available as of December 31, 2018. As such, we recorded an additional $0.3 billion in tax for our one-time transition tax and a tax benefit of $0.3 billion, primarily related to a reduction in deferred taxes on related withholding taxes and state income taxes in 2018. We also remeasured and adjusted certain deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the rates at which they are expected to reverse in the future, which is generally 21.0 percent. This adjustment was not significant. We have not recorded incremental income taxes for any additional outside basis differences of approximately $8.1 billion in our investments in foreign subsidiaries, as these amounts continue to be indefinitely reinvested in foreign operations. Determining the amount of unrecognized deferred tax liability related to any additional outside basis differences in these entities is not practicable.
The Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income ("GILTI") provisions of the Tax Reform Act require the Company to include in its U.S. income tax return foreign subsidiary earnings in excess of an allowable return on the foreign subsidiary's tangible assets. An accounting policy election is available to either account for the tax effects of GILTI in the period that is subject to such taxes or to provide deferred taxes for book and tax basis differences that upon reversal may be subject to such taxes. We have elected to account for the tax effects of these provisions in the period that is subject to such tax and the impact is reflected in our full year provision. 
Based on current tax laws, the Company's effective tax rate in 2019 is expected to be approximately 19.5 percent before considering the potential impact of any significant operating and nonoperating items that may affect our effective tax rate.
Operations Review
Our organizational structure as of December 31, 2018 consistedconsists of the following operating segments: Europe, Middle East and Africa; Latin America; North America; Asia Pacific; Global Ventures; and Bottling Investments. Our operating structure also includedincludes Corporate, which consists of two components: (1) a center focused on strategic initiatives, policy and governance and (2) an enablinga platform services organization focused on both simplifying and standardizing key transactional processes and providing support to business units through global centers of excellence.organization. For furtheradditional information regarding our operating segments and Corporate, refer to Note 2019 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Structural Changes, Acquired Brands and Newly Licensed Brands
In order to continually improve upon the Company'sCompany’s operating performance, from time to time, we engage in buying and selling ownership interests in bottling partners and other manufacturing operations. In addition, we also acquire brands and their related operations or enter into license agreements for certain brands to supplement our beverage offerings. These items impact our operating results and certain key metrics used by management in assessing the Company'sCompany’s performance.
Unit case volume growth is a metric used by management to evaluate the Company'sCompany’s performance because it measures demand for our products at the consumer level. The Company'sCompany’s unit case volume represents the number of unit cases (or unit case equivalents) of Company beverage products directly or indirectly sold by the Company and its bottling partners to customers or consumers and, therefore, reflects unit case volume for both consolidated and unconsolidated bottlers. Refer to the heading "Beverage Volume"“Beverage Volume” below.
Concentrate sales volume represents the amount of concentrates, syrups, beverage bases, source waters and powders/minerals (in all instances expressed in equivalent unit cases)case equivalents) sold by, or used in finished products sold by, the Company to its bottling partners or other customers. For Costa non-ready-to-drink beverage products, concentrate sales volume represents the amount of beverages, primarily measured in number of transactions (in all instances expressed in unit case equivalents), sold by the Company to customers or consumers. Refer to the heading "Beverage Volume"“Beverage Volume” below.
Our Bottling Investments operating segment and our other finished product operations typically generate net operating revenues by selling sparkling soft drinks and a variety of other beverages, such as juices, juice drinks, sports drinks, waters, teas and coffees, to retailers or to distributors, wholesalers and bottling partners who distribute them to retailers. In addition, in the United States, we manufacture fountain syrups and sell them to fountain retailers such as restaurants and convenience stores who use the fountain syrups to produce beverages for immediate consumption, or to authorized fountain wholesalers or bottling partners who resell the fountain syrups to fountain retailers. For these consolidated finished product operations, we recognize the associated concentrate sales volume at the time the unit case or unit case equivalent is sold to the customer. Our concentrate operations typically generate net operating revenues by selling concentrates and syrups to authorized bottling operations. For

these concentrate operations, we recognize concentrate revenue and concentrate sales volume when we sell concentrate and syrups to the authorized unconsolidated bottling operations, and we typically report unit case volume when finished products manufactured from the concentrates and syrups are sold to the customer. When we analyze our net operating revenues, we generally consider the following five factors: (1) volume growth (concentrate sales volume or unit case volume, as applicable); (2) changes in price, product and geographic mix; (3) foreign currency fluctuations; and (4) acquisitions and divestitures (including structural changes defined below), as applicable; (3) changes in price, product and geographic mix; (4) foreign currency fluctuations; and (5) the impact of our adoption of the new revenue recognition accounting standard.applicable. Refer to the heading "Net“Net Operating Revenues"Revenues” below. The Company sells concentrates and syrups to both consolidated and unconsolidated bottling partners. The ownership structure of our bottling partners impacts the timing of recognizing concentrate revenue and concentrate sales volume. When we sell concentrates or syrups to our consolidated bottling partners, we do not recognize the concentrate revenue or concentrate sales volume until the bottling partner has sold finished products manufactured from the concentrates or syrups to a third party. When we sell concentrates or syrups to our unconsolidated bottling partners, we recognize the concentrate revenue and concentrate sales volume when the concentrates or syrups are sold to the bottling partner. The subsequent sale of the finished products manufactured from the concentrates or syrups to a third party does not impact the timing of recognizing the concentrate revenue or concentrate sales volume. When we account for an unconsolidated bottling partner as an equity method investment, we eliminate the intercompany profit related to these transactions to the extent of our ownership interest until the equity method investee has sold finished products manufactured from the concentrates or syrups to
41


a third party. We typically report unit case volume when finished products manufactured from the concentrates or syrups are sold to a third party, regardless of our ownership interest in the bottling partner, if any.
We generally refer to acquisitions and divestitures of bottling and distribution operations as structural“structural changes, which are a component of acquisitions and divestitures ("structural changes").divestitures. Typically, structural changes do not impact the Company'sCompany’s unit case volume or concentrate sales volume on a consolidated basis or at the geographic operating segment level. We recognize unit case volume for all sales of Company beverage products, regardless of our ownership interest in the bottling partner, if any. However, the unit case volume reported by our Bottling Investments operating segment is generally impacted by structural changes because it only includes the unit case volume of our consolidated bottling operations. Refer to Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the Company'sCompany’s acquisitions and divestitures.
"Acquired brands"brands” refers to brands acquired during the past 12 months. Typically, the Company has not reported unit case volume or recognized concentrate sales volume related to acquired brands in periods prior to the closing of a transaction. Therefore, the unit case volume and concentrate sales volume from the sale of these brands isrelated to an acquired brand are incremental to prior year volume. We generally do not generally consider acquired brandsthe acquisition of a brand to be a structural changes.change.
"Licensed brands"brands” refers to brands not owned by the Company but for which we hold certain rights, generally including, but not limited to, distribution rights, and from which we derive an economic benefit when these brandsthe products are ultimately sold. Typically, the Company has not reported unit case volume or recognized concentrate sales volume related to these brandsa licensed brand in periods prior to the beginning of the term of a license agreement. Therefore, in the year that the licenses area license agreement is entered into, the unit case volume and concentrate sales volume from the sale of these brands isrelated to a licensed brand are incremental to prior year volume. We generally do not generally consider newly licensed brandsthe licensing of a brand to be a structural changes.change.
In 2018,2021, the Company acquired a controllingthe remaining ownership interest in the Philippine bottling operations, which was previously accounted for as an equity method investee.BA Sports Nutrition, LLC (“BodyArmor”). The impact of this acquisition has been included as a structural changein acquisitions and divestitures in our analysis of net operating revenues on a consolidated basis as well as for the Bottling Investments and Asia PacificNorth America operating segments. Thesegment.
In 2020, the Company also acquired a controlling interest in the franchise bottler in Oman.discontinued our Odwalla juice business. The impact of this acquisitiondiscontinuing our Odwalla juice business has been included as a structural changein acquisitions and divestitures in our analysis of net operating revenues on a consolidated basis as well as for the Bottling InvestmentsNorth America operating segment.
In 2018, the Company refranchised our Canadian and Latin American bottling operations. The impact of these refranchising activities has been included as a structural change in our analysis of net operating revenues on a consolidated basis as well as for our North America, Latin America and Bottling Investments operating segments. In addition, for non-Company-owned and licensed brands sold in the Canadian refranchised territories for which the Company no longer reports unit case volume, we have eliminated the unit case volume from the base year when calculating 2018 versus 2017 volume growth rates on a consolidated basis as well as for the North America and Bottling Investments operating segments. Refer to the headings "Beverage Volume" and "Net Operating Revenues" below.
In 2017, Anheuser-Busch InBev's ("ABI") controlling interest in Coca-Cola Beverages Africa Proprietary Limited ("CCBA") was transitioned to the Company, resulting in its consolidation. The results of CCBA have been recorded as discontinued operations. The impact of this transaction has been included as a structural change in our analysis of net operating revenues on a consolidated basis as well as for the Europe, Middle East and Africa operating segment.
Also in 2017, the Company refranchised its bottling operations in China to the two local franchise bottlers. The impact of these refranchising activities has been included as a structural change in our analysis of net operating revenues on a consolidated basis as well as for our Asia Pacific and Bottling Investments operating segments.
Throughout 2017 and 2016, the Company refranchised bottling territories in the United States that were previously managed by CCR to certain of our unconsolidated bottling partners. The impact of these refranchising activities has been included as a structural change in our analysis of net operating revenues on a consolidated basis as well as for our North America and Bottling Investments operating segments. In addition, for non-Company-owned and licensed brands sold in the refranchised territories for which the Company no longer reports unit case volume, we have eliminated the unit case volume from the applicable base year when calculating volume growth rates on a consolidated basis as well as for the North America and Bottling Investments operating segments.
During 2016, the Company deconsolidated its South African bottling operations and disposed of its related equity method investment in exchange for equity method investments in CCBA and CCBA's South African subsidiary. As part of the

transaction, the Company also acquired and licensed several brands. The impacts of the deconsolidation, the disposal of the related equity method investment, and the new equity method investments have been included as a structural change in our analysis of net operating revenues on a consolidated basis as well as for our Europe, Middle East and Africa and Bottling Investments operating segments. The brands and licenses that the Company acquired impacted the Company's unit case volume and concentrate sales volume and therefore, in addition to being included as a structural change, they are also considered acquired brands.
During 2016, the Company also deconsolidated our German bottling operations as a result of their being combined to create CCEP. As a result of the transaction, the Company now owns an equity method investment in CCEP. Accordingly, the impact of the deconsolidation and new equity method investment has been included as a structural change in our analysis of net operating revenues on a consolidated basis as well as for our Europe, Middle East and Africa and Bottling Investments operating segments. The Company also changed our funding arrangement with our bottling partners in China, which resulted in a reduction in net operating revenues with an offsetting reduction in direct marketing expense. The impact of the change in the arrangement has been included as a structural change in our analysis of net operating revenues on a consolidated basis as well as for our Asia Pacific operating segment.
The Company sells concentrates and syrups to both consolidated and unconsolidated bottling partners. The ownership structure of our bottling partners impacts the timing of recognizing concentrate revenue and concentrate sales volume. When we sell concentrates or syrups to our consolidated bottling partners, we are not able to recognize the concentrate revenue or concentrate sales volume until the bottling partner has sold finished products manufactured from the concentrates or syrups to a third party or independent customer. When we sell concentrates or syrups to our unconsolidated bottling partners, we recognize the concentrate revenue and concentrate sales volume when the concentrates or syrups are sold to the bottling partner. The subsequent sale of the finished products manufactured from the concentrates or syrups to a third party or independent customer does not impact the timing of recognizing the concentrate revenue or concentrate sales volume. When we account for an unconsolidated bottling partner as an equity method investment, we eliminate the intercompany profit related to these transactions to the extent of our ownership interest until the equity method investee has sold finished products manufactured from the concentrates or syrups to a third party or independent customer.
Beverage Volume
We measure the volume of Company beverage products sold in two ways: (1) unit cases of finished products and (2) concentrate sales. As used in this report, "unit case"“unit case” means a unit of measurement equal to 192 U.S. fluid ounces of finished beverage (24 eight-ounce servings);, with the exception of unit case equivalents for Costa non-ready-to-drink beverage products, which are primarily measured in number of transactions; and "unit“unit case volume"volume” means the number of unit cases (or unit case equivalents) of Company beverage products directly or indirectly sold by the Company and its bottling partners to customers.customers or consumers. Unit case volume consists primarily consists of beverage products bearing Company trademarks. Also included in unit case volume are certain productsbrands licensed to, or distributed by, our Company, and brands owned by Coca-Cola system bottlers for which our Company provides marketing support and from the sale of which we derive an economic benefit. In addition, unit case volume includes sales by certain joint ventures in which the Company has an equityownership interest. We believe unit case volume is one of the measures of the underlying strength of the Coca-Cola system because it measures trends at the consumer level. The unit case volume numbers used in this report are derived based on estimates received by the Company from its bottling partners and distributors. Concentrate sales volume represents the amount of concentrates, syrups, beverage bases, source waters and powders/minerals (in all instances expressed in equivalent unit cases)case equivalents) sold by, or used in finished beverages sold by, the Company to its bottling partners or other customers. For Costa non-ready-to-drink beverage products, concentrate sales volume represents the amount of beverages, primarily measured in number of transactions (in all instances expressed in unit case equivalents), sold by the Company to customers or consumers. Unit case volume and concentrate sales volume growth rates are not necessarily equal during any given period. Factors such as seasonality, bottlers'bottlers’ inventory practices, supply point changes, timing of price increases, new product introductions and changes in product mix can impact unit case volume and concentrate sales volume and can create differences between unit case volume and concentrate sales volume growth rates. In addition to thethese items, mentioned above, the impact of unit case volume from certain joint ventures in which the Company has an equityownership interest, but to which the Company does not sell concentrates, syrups, beverage bases, source waters or powders/minerals, may give rise to differences between unit case volume and concentrate sales volume growth rates.

42


Information about our volume growth worldwide and by operating segment is as follows:
Percent Change 2021 versus 2020
Unit Cases1,2Concentrate Sales
Worldwide%

%
Europe, Middle East & Africa%12 %
Latin America
North America
Asia Pacific10 11 
Global Ventures17 

20 
Bottling Investments11          N/A
 
Percent Change  
 
 2018 versus 2017 2017 versus 2016 
Year Ended December 31,
Unit Cases1,2

 
Concentrate
       Sales

 
Unit Cases1,2

 
Concentrate
       Sales

 
Worldwide2% 3% % % 
Europe, Middle East & Africa2% 6%
4 
1% 1%
8 
Latin America
 1
 (2) (3) 
North America1
 (1)
5 

 2
9 
Asia Pacific4
 4
6 
1
 4
10 
Bottling Investments(15)
3 
N/A
 (41)
7 
N/A
 
1
1Bottling Investments operating segment data reflects unit case volume growth for consolidated bottlers only.
2
Geographic operating segment data reflects unit case volume growth for all bottlers, both consolidated and unconsolidated, and distributors in the applicable geographic areas.
3
After considering the impact of structural changes, unit case volume for Bottling Investments for the year ended December 31, 2018 grew 11 percent.
4
After considering the impact of structural changes, concentrate sales volume for Europe, Middle East and Africa for the year ended December 31, 2018 grew 4 percent.
5
After considering the impact of structural changes, concentrate sales volume for North America for the year ended December 31, 2018 grew 1 percent.
6
After considering the impact of structural changes, concentrate sales volume for Asia Pacific for the year ended December 31, 2018 grew 5 percent.
7
After considering the impact of structural changes, unit case volume for Bottling Investments for the year ended December 31, 2017 declined 3 percent.
8
After considering the impact of structural changes, concentrate sales volume for Europe, Middle East and Africa for the year ended December 31, 2017 grew 2 percent.
9
After considering the impact of structural changes, concentrate sales volume for North America for the year ended December 31, 2017 was even.
10 After considering the impact of structural changes, concentrate sales volume for Asia Pacific for the year ended December 31, 2017 grew 1 percent.
Unit Case Volume
The Coca-Cola system sold 29.6 billion, 29.2 billion and 29.3 billion unit cases of our products in 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The unit case volume for 2018, 2017 and 2016 reflects the impact of brands acquired and licensed during the applicable year. The unit case volume for 2018, 2017 and 2016 also reflects the impact of the transfer of distribution rights with respect to non-Company-owned brands that were previously licensed to us in North American bottling territories that have since been refranchised. The Company eliminated the unit case volume related to these structural changes from the base year, as applicable, when calculating 2018 versus 2017 and 2017 versus 2016 unit case volume growth rates.for consolidated bottlers only.
2Geographic and Global Ventures operating segment data reflect unit case volume growth for all bottlers, both consolidated and unconsolidated, and distributors in the applicable geographic areas. Global Ventures operating segment data also reflects unit case volume growth for Costa retail stores.
Unit Case Volume
Sparkling soft drinks represented 69 percent of our worldwide unit case volume for 2018, 2017in both 2021 and 2016.2020. Trademark Coca‑Cola accounted for 4547 percent of our worldwide unit case volume for 2018, 2017in both 2021 and 2016.
2020. In 2018,2021, unit case volume in the United States represented 1817 percent of the Company'sCompany’s worldwide unit case volume. Of the U.S. unit case volume, 6261 percent was attributable to sparkling soft drinks. Trademark Coca-Cola accounted for 4342 percent of U.S. unit case volume.
Unit case volume outside the United States represented 8283 percent of the Company'sCompany’s worldwide unit case volume for 2018.in 2021. The countries outside the United States in which our unit case volumes were the largest were Mexico, China, Brazil and Japan,India, which together accounted for 31 percent of our worldwide unit case volume. Of the non-U.S. unit case volume, 7071 percent was attributable to sparkling soft drinks. Trademark Coca-Cola accounted for 4648 percent of non-U.S. unit case volume.
Year Ended December 31, 2018 versus Year Ended December 31, 2017The Coca-Cola system sold 31.3 billion and 29.0 billion unit cases of our products in 2021 and 2020, respectively. The increase was primarily a result of the gradual recovery in away-from-home channels in many markets throughout 2021, along with the larger impact of shelter-in-place and social distancing requirements in 2020.
Unit case volume in Europe, Middle East and Africa grew 2increased 9 percent, which included 9 percent growth in both Trademark Coca-Cola and sparkling flavors, 17 percent growth in nutrition, juice, dairy and plant-based beverages, and 6 percent growth in hydration, sports, coffee and tea. The operating segment reported growth in unit case volume of 27 percent in the Europe operating unit, 12 percent in the Eurasia and Middle East operating unit and 10 percent in the Africa operating unit.
In Latin America, unit case volume increased 6 percent, which included 5 percent growth in Trademark Coca-Cola, 7 percent growth in hydration, sports, coffee and tea, 6 percent growth in sparkling soft drinksflavors and 10 percent growth in nutrition, juice, dairy and plant-based beverages. The operating segment’s volume performance included 3 percent growth in Mexico, 14 percent growth in Argentina and 3 percent growth in water, enhanced water and sports drinks. GrowthBrazil.
Unit case volume in North America increased 5 percent, which included 9 percent growth in sparkling soft drinks was primarily driven byflavors, 6 percent growth in hydration, sports, coffee and tea, 2 percent growth in Trademark Coca-Cola, and 37 percent growth in Trademark Fanta. The group reported increases in unit case volume in the Central & Eastern Europe; Turkey, Caucasus & Central Asia; and Middle East & North Africa business units.

The unit case volume growth in these business units was partially offset by a decline in the West Africa business unit. Volume in the South & East Africa and Western Europe business units was even.
In Latin America, unit case volume was even, which included growth of 4 percent in juice, dairy and plant-based beverages and 1 percent in water, enhanced water and sports drinks. Sparkling soft drinks volume was even. The group's volume reflected growth of 1 percent in each of the Mexico, Brazil and Latin Center business units, offset by a 4 percent decline in the South Latin business unit. The growth in Mexico's volume was primarily driven by 1 percent growth in sparkling soft drinks and 8 percent growth in juice, dairy and plant-based beverages. The decline in South Latin's volume was driven by a 4 percent decline in sparkling soft drinks.
Unit case volume in North America grew 1 percent. Sparkling soft drinks grew 1 percent, which included growth of 3 percent in Trademark Sprite and 1 percent in Trademark Coca‑Cola. Unit case volume in water, enhanced water and sports drinks grew 2 percent, primarily driven by 2 percent growth in packaged water and 1 percent growth in sports drinks. Growth in these category clusters was partially offset by a 3 percent decline innutrition, juice, dairy and plant-based beverages.
In Asia Pacific, unit case volume grew 4increased 10 percent, reflecting 4which included 11 percent growth in sparkling soft drinks, 5 percent growth in water, enhanced water and sports drinks, and 4 percent growth in tea and coffee. Growth in sparkling soft drinks volume included 5 percent growth inboth Trademark Coca-Cola and sparkling flavors, 6 percent growth in Trademark Sprite. Volume within the water, enhanced waterhydration, sports, coffee and sports drinks category cluster includedtea, and 18 percent growth in nutrition, juice, dairy and plant-based beverages. The operating segment reported growth in unit case volume of 7 percent in packaged water. The group's volume reflects growth of 611 percent in the Greater China & Korea businessand Mongolia operating unit, 1033 percent in the India &and Southwest Asia operating unit, 3 percent in the ASEAN and South West Asia businessPacific operating unit and 12 percent in the Japan businessand South Korea operating unit. Volume
Unit case volume for Global Ventures increased 17 percent, driven by 16 percent growth in the South Pacifichydration, sports, coffee and ASEAN business units was even.tea, along with growth in energy drinks, partially offset by a decline of 3 percent in nutrition, juice, dairy and plant-based beverages.
Unit case volume for Bottling Investments declined 15 percent. This decreaseincreased 11 percent, which primarily reflects the impact of refranchising activities, partially offset by growth in India, as well as the impact of bottler acquisitions. Refer to Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
Year Ended December 31, 2017 versus Year Ended December 31, 2016
In Europe, Middle East and Africa, unit case volume grew 1 percent, reflecting an 8 percent increase in tea and coffee, a 5 percent increase in water, enhanced water and sports drinks and a 1 percent increase in sparkling soft drinks. These increases were partially offset by a decrease of 3 percent in juice, dairy and plant-based beverages. The group reported increases in unit case volume in our Central & Eastern Europe, Turkey, Caucasus & Central Asia, South & East Africa and West Africa business units. The increases in these business units were partially offset by even results in both our Middle East & North Africa and Western Europe business units.the Philippines.
Unit case volume in Latin America decreased 2 percent, which included declines of 3 percent in sparkling soft drinks and 1 percent in water, enhanced water and sports drinks. The group's volume reflected declines of 10 percent in the Latin Center business unit and 6 percent in the Brazil business unit. These declines were partially offset by 1 percent growth in the Mexico business unit, which included 1 percent growth in water, enhanced water and sports drinks, and even performance in sparkling soft drinks.
43

In North America, unit case volume was even, reflecting even volume for sparkling soft drinks, a 2 percent decline in water, enhanced water and sports drinks, and growth in energy drinks. North America's volume performance in sparkling soft drinks included 4 percent growth in Trademark Sprite and 5 percent growth in Trademark Fanta offset by a 5 percent decline in Diet Coke.

Unit case volume in Asia Pacific increased 1 percent, reflecting a 2 percent increase in both sparkling soft drinks and juice, dairy and plant-based beverages. The increase in sparkling soft drinks included 4 percent growth in Trademark Coca-Cola. The group's unit case volume reflected an increase of 2 percent in both the ASEAN and Greater China & Korea business units and a 1 percent increase in the India & South West Asia business unit, partially offset by a 2 percent decline in the South Pacific business unit. Unit case volume in the Japan business unit was even.
Unit case volume for Bottling Investments decreased 41 percent. This decrease primarily reflects the North America refranchising activities and the refranchising of our China bottling operations.
Concentrate Sales Volume
In 2018, worldwide unit case sales volume grew 2 percent and concentrate sales volume grew 3 percent compared to 2017. In 2017,2021, worldwide concentrate sales volume increased 9 percent and unit case volume were both evenincreased 8 percent compared to 2016.2020. The differences between concentrate sales volume and unit case volume growth rates on a consolidated basis and for the operating segments were primarily due to the timing of concentrate shipments structural changes and the impact of unit case volume from certain joint ventures in which the Company has an equityownership interest, but to which the Company does not sell concentrates, syrups, beverage basessource waters or powders.powders/minerals. The difference between the unit case volume andtiming of concentrate sales volume growth rates in 2018 for both worldwide and Europe, Middle East and Africa included the impactshipments was primarily a result of the dissolution of Beverage Partners Worldwidecertain bottlers building inventory due to concerns associated with potential supply chain disruptions.

("BPW"), a former tea joint venture to whom we did not sell concentrate. The BPW joint venture was replaced by the launch of Fuze Tea, for which the Company produces and sells the related concentrate.
Analysis of Consolidated Statements of Income
       
Percent Change  
Year Ended December 31,2018
 2017
 2016
 2018 vs. 2017 2017 vs. 2016
(In millions except percentages and per share data)       
NET OPERATING REVENUES$31,856
 $35,410
 $41,863
 (10)% (15)%
Cost of goods sold11,770
 13,255
 16,465
 (11) (19)
GROSS PROFIT20,086
 22,155
 25,398
 (9) (13)
GROSS PROFIT MARGIN63.1% 62.6% 60.7%    
Selling, general and administrative expenses10,307
 12,654
 15,370
 (19) (18)
Other operating charges1,079
 1,902
 1,371
 (43) 39
OPERATING INCOME8,700
 7,599
 8,657
 14 (12)
OPERATING MARGIN27.3% 21.5% 20.7%    
Interest income682
 677
 642
 1 6
Interest expense919
 841
 733
 9 15
Equity income (loss) — net1,008
 1,071
 835
 (6) 28
Other income (loss) — net(1,121) (1,764) (1,265) 36 (39)
INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE
   INCOME TAXES
8,350
 6,742
 8,136
 24 (17)
Income taxes from continuing operations1,623
 5,560
 1,586
 (71) 251
Effective tax rate19.4% 82.5% 19.5%    
NET INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS6,727
 1,182
 6,550
 469 (82)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations (net of income taxes
   of $126, $47 and $0, respectively)
(251) 101
 
 * *
CONSOLIDATED NET INCOME6,476
 1,283
 6,550
 405 (80)
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests42
 35
 23
 22 55
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO SHAREOWNERS OF
   THE COCA-COLA COMPANY
$6,434
 $1,248
 $6,527
 416% (81)%
*
Calculation is not meaningful.






Net Operating Revenues
Year EndedDecember 31, 2018 versus Year Ended December 31, 2017
The Company's netNet operating revenues decreased $3,554were $38,655 million in 2021, compared to $33,014 million in 2020, an increase of $5,641 million, or 1017 percent.
The following table illustrates, on a percentage basis, the estimated impact of keythe factors resulting in the increase (decrease) in net operating revenues on a consolidated basis and for each of our operating segments:
Percent Change 2018 versus 2017Percent Change 2021 versus 2020
Volume1

 Acquisitions & Divestitures
 
Price, Product &
Geographic Mix

 
Currency
Fluctuations

 Accounting Changes
Total
Volume1
Price, Product & Geographic MixForeign Currency Fluctuations
Acquisitions & Divestitures2
Total
Consolidated3% (16)% 2% (1)% 2%(10)%Consolidated%%%— %17 %
Europe, Middle East & Africa4% 1% 3% (1)% (3)%4%Europe, Middle East & Africa12 %%%— %19 %
Latin America1
 
 10
 (9) (3)
Latin America12 — — 18 
North America1
 (1) 
 
 11
9
North America— — 15 
Asia Pacific5
 (1) 
 1
 (5)
Asia Pacific11 (2)— 12 
Global VenturesGlobal Ventures20 13 — 41 
Bottling Investments11
 (78) 
 
 3
(64)Bottling Investments11 — 15 
Note: Certain rows may not add due to rounding.
1
1Represents the percent change in net operating revenues attributable to the increase (decrease) in concentrate sales volume for our geographic operating segments and our Global Ventures operating segment (expressed in unit case equivalents) after considering the impact of acquisitions and divestitures. For our Bottling Investments operating segment, this represents the percent change in net operating revenues attributable to the increase (decrease) in unit case volume after considering the impact of structural changes, if any. Our Bottling Investments operating segment data reflects unit case volume growth for consolidated bottlers only after considering the impact of structural changes, if any. Refer to the heading “Beverage Volume” above.
2Includes structural changes, if any. Refer to the heading “Structural Changes, Acquired Brands and Newly Licensed Brands” above.
Represents the percent change in net operating revenues attributable to the increase (decrease) in concentrate sales volume for our geographic operating segments (expressed in equivalent unit cases) after considering the impact of structural changes. For our Bottling Investments operating segment, this represents the percent change in net operating revenues attributable to the increase (decrease) in unit case volume after considering the impact of structural changes. Our Bottling Investments operating segment data reflects unit case volume growth for consolidated bottlers only. Refer to the heading "Beverage Volume" above.
Refer to the heading "Beverage Volume"“Beverage Volume” above for additional information related to changes in our unit case and concentrate sales volumes.
"Acquisitions and divestitures" refers to acquisitions and divestitures of brands or businesses, some of which the Company considers to be structural changes. Refer to the heading "Structural Changes, Acquired Brands and Newly Licensed Brands" above for additional information related to the structural changes.
"Price, product and geographic mix"mix” refers to the change in net operating revenues caused by factors such as price changes, the mix of products and packages sold, and the mix of channels and geographic territories where the sales occurred.
"Accounting changes" refers to the The impact of price, product and geographic mix is calculated by subtracting the change in net operating revenues resulting from volume increases or decreases, changes in foreign currency exchange rates, and acquisitions and divestitures from the total change in net operating revenues. Management believes that providing investors with price, product and geographic mix enhances their understanding about the combined impact that the following items had on the Company’s net operating revenues: (1) pricing actions taken by the Company and, where applicable, our adoptionbottling partners; (2) changes in the mix of products and packages sold; (3) changes in the new revenue recognition accounting standard. Refer to Note 3mix of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.channels where products were sold; and (4) changes in the mix of geographic territories where products were sold. Management uses this measure in making financial, operating and planning decisions and in evaluating the Company’s performance.
Price, product and geographic mix had a 26 percent favorable impact on our consolidated net operating revenues. Price, product and geographic mix was impacted by a variety of factors and events including, but not limited to, the following:
Europe, Middle East and Africa — favorable price mix in all of the segment's business units as well as favorable productchannel and package mix, partially offset by unfavorable geographic mix;
Latin America — favorable price mixpricing initiatives, inflationary pricing in Argentina, and the impact of inflationary environments in certain markets;favorable channel and package mix;
North America — favorable pricing initiatives offset by incremental freight costs;and favorable channel and category mix;
Asia Pacific — favorably impacted asunfavorable geographic mix, partially offset by favorable product and package mix;
44


Global Ventures — favorable channel mix primarily due to the reopening of Costa retail stores, partially offset by unfavorable product mix; and
Bottling Investments — favorable price, category and package mix, partially offset by unfavorable geographic mix.
The favorable channel and package mix for the year ended December 31, 2021 in all applicable operating segments was primarily a result of pricing initiatives as well as productthe gradual recovery in away-from-home channels in many markets throughout 2021 and package mix, offset by geographic mix;the larger impact of shelter-in-place and
Bottling Investments — unfavorable price, product and package mix social distancing requirements in certain bottling operations, offset by geographic mix.        2020.
Foreign currency fluctuations decreasedincreased our consolidated net operating revenues by 1 percent. This unfavorablefavorable impact was primarily due to a strongerweaker U.S. dollar compared to certain foreign currencies, including the Argentine peso,British pound sterling, South African rand, euro, Chinese yuan and Mexican peso, Brazilian real and Australian dollar which had an unfavorablea favorable impact on our Europe, Middle East and Africa; Asia Pacific; Latin AmericaAmerica; Global Ventures; and Asia PacificBottling Investments operating segments. The unfavorablefavorable impact of a strongerweaker U.S. dollar compared to the currencies listed above was partially offset by the impact of a weakerstronger U.S. dollar compared to certain other foreign currencies, including the euro, British pound sterling,Argentine peso, Brazilian real, Turkish lira, Ethiopian birr and Japanese yen, and South African rand which had a favorablean unfavorable impact on our Latin America; Europe, Middle East and AfricaAfrica; Asia Pacific; and Asia PacificBottling Investments operating segments. Refer to the heading "Liquidity,“Liquidity, Capital Resources and Financial Position — Foreign Exchange"Exchange” below.


“Acquisitions and divestitures” generally refers to acquisitions and divestitures of brands or businesses, some of which the Company considers to be structural changes. The impact of acquisitions and divestitures is the difference between the change in net operating revenues and the change in what our net operating revenues would have been if we removed the net operating revenues associated with an acquisition or a divestiture from either the current year or the prior year, as applicable. Management believes that quantifying the impact that acquisitions and divestitures had on the Company’s net operating revenues provides investors with useful information to enhance their understanding of the Company’s net operating revenue performance by improving their ability to compare our year-to-year results. Management considers the impact of acquisitions and divestitures when evaluating the Company’s performance. Refer to the heading “Structural Changes, Acquired Brands and Newly Licensed Brands” above for additional information related to acquisitions and divestitures.
Net operating revenue growth rates are impacted by sales volume; acquisitions and divestitures; price, product and geographic mix; and foreign currency fluctuations.fluctuations; and acquisitions and divestitures. The size and timing of acquisitions and divestitures are not consistent from period to period. The Company currently expects acquisitions and divestitures to have a favorable impact of 8 percent to 9 percent on full year 2019 net operating revenues. Based on current spot rates and our hedging coverage in place, we expect currenciesforeign currency fluctuations will have an unfavorablea negative impact on our full year 20192022 net operating revenues.
Year Ended December 31, 2017 versus Year Ended December 31, 2016
The Company's net operating revenues decreased $6,453 million, or 15 percent.
The following table illustrates, on a percentage basis, the estimated impact of key factors resulting in the increase (decrease) in net operating revenues on a consolidated basis and for each of our operating segments:
 Percent Change 2017 vs. 2016
 
Volume1

 Acquisitions & Divestitures
 
Price, Product &
Geographic Mix

 
Currency
Fluctuations

 Total
Consolidated% (17)% 3% (1)% (15)%
Europe, Middle East & Africa2% (2)% 3% (2)% 1%
Latin America(3) 
 8
 
 5
North America
 2
 3
 
 4
Asia Pacific1
 
 (1) (4) (2)
Bottling Investments(3) (48) 4
 
 (47)
Note: Certain rows may not add due to rounding.
1
Represents the percent change in net operating revenues attributable to the increase (decrease) in concentrate sales volume for our geographic operating segments (expressed in equivalent unit cases) after considering the impact of structural changes. For our Bottling Investments operating segment, this represents the percent change in net operating revenues attributable to the increase (decrease) in unit case volume after considering the impact of structural changes. Our Bottling Investments operating segment data reflects unit case volume growth for consolidated bottlers only. Refer to the heading "Beverage Volume" above.
Price, product and geographic mix had a 3 percent favorable impact on our consolidated net operating revenues. Price, product and geographic mix was impacted by a variety of factors and events including, but not limited to, the following:
Europe, Middle East and Africa — favorably impacted as a result of pricing initiatives and product and package mix, partially offset by geographic mix;
Latin America — favorable price mix in all four of the segment's business units and the impact of inflationary environments in certain markets;
North America — favorably impacted as a result of pricing initiatives and product and package mix;
Asia Pacific — unfavorably impacted by geographic mix, partially offset by the favorable impact of pricing initiatives and product and package mix; and
Bottling Investments — favorably impacted as a result of pricing initiatives and product and package mix in North America.
Foreign currency fluctuations decreased our consolidated net operating revenues by 1 percent. This unfavorable impact was primarily due to a stronger U.S. dollar compared to certain foreign currencies, including the British pound sterling, Japanese yen, Argentine peso and Mexican peso, which had an unfavorable impact on our Europe, Middle East and Africa, Asia Pacific and Latin America operating segments. The unfavorable impact of a stronger U.S. dollar compared to the currencies listed above was partially offset by the impact of a weaker U.S. dollar compared to certain other foreign currencies, including the euro, South African rand, Australian dollar and Brazilian real, which had a favorable impact on our Europe, Middle East and Africa, Asia Pacific and Latin America operating segments. Refer to the heading "Liquidity, Capital Resources and Financial Position — Foreign Exchange" below.

Information about our net operating revenues by operating segment and Corporate as a percentage of Company net operating revenues is as follows:
Year Ended December 31,2018
 2017
 2016
 
Europe, Middle East & Africa22.8% 20.7% 16.8% 
Latin America12.7
 11.2
 8.9
 
North America36.7
 24.9
1 
15.8
1 
Asia Pacific15.4
 13.5
 11.4
 
Bottling Investments12.1
 29.3
1 
46.8
1 
Corporate0.3
 0.4
 0.3
 
Total100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 
1 Amounts have been adjusted to reflect the reclassification of certain revenue streams from the Bottling Investments operating segment to the North America operating segment effective January 1, 2018.
Year Ended December 31,20212020
Europe, Middle East & Africa17.0 %16.8 %
Latin America10.7 10.6 
North America34.1 34.7 
Asia Pacific12.1 12.8 
Global Ventures7.3 6.0 
Bottling Investments18.6 19.0 
Corporate0.2 0.1 
Total100.0 %100.0 %
The percentage contribution of each operating segment fluctuates over time due to net operating revenues in certainsome operating segments growing at a faster rate compared to other operating segments. Net operating revenue growth rates are impacted by sales volume; acquisitions and divestitures; price, product and geographic mix; foreign currency fluctuations and accounting changes. For additional information about the impact of foreign currency fluctuations, refer to the heading "Liquidity,“Liquidity, Capital Resources and Financial Position — Foreign Exchange" below and for additional information about acquisitions and divestitures, refer to Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.Exchange” below.
Gross Profit Margin
AsGross profit margin is a resultratio calculated by dividing gross profit by net operating revenues. Management believes gross profit margin provides investors with useful information related to the profitability of our finished goods operations, which are primarily included in our North America and Bottling Investments operating segments, the following inputs represent a substantial portionbusiness prior to considering all of the Company's total cost of goods sold: (1) sweeteners, (2) metals, (3) juicesoperating costs incurred. Management uses this measure in making financial, operating and (4) PET. The Company enters into hedging activities related to certain commoditiesplanning decisions and in order to mitigate a portion ofevaluating the price risk associated with forecasted purchases. Many of the derivative financial instruments used by the Company to mitigate the risk associated with these commodity exposures, including any related foreign currency exposure, do not qualify for hedge accounting. As a result, the changes in fair value of these derivative instruments have been, and will continue to be, included as a component of net income in each reporting period. The Company recorded a net loss related to these derivatives of $20 million during the year December 31, 2018 and recorded net gains of $14 million and $79 million during the years ended December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, in the line item cost of goods sold in our consolidated statements of income. Refer to Note 6 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Year EndedDecember 31, 2018 versus Year EndedDecember 31, 2017Company’s performance.
Our gross profit margin increased to 63.160.3 percent in 20182021 from 62.659.3 percent in 2017. The2020. This increase was primarily due to the impact of divestitures,favorable pricing initiatives and favorable channel and package mix as well as the gradual recovery in away-from-home channels in many markets throughout 2021, partially offset by the unfavorable impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuationsincreased commodity and transportation
45


costs. We expect commodity and transportation costs to continue to increase in 2022, and we will continue to proactively take actions in an effort to mitigate the impact of accounting changes related to the new revenue recognition accounting standard. Refer to Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information related to acquisitions and divestitures. Refer to Note 3 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the adoption of the new revenue recognition accounting standard.these incremental costs.
Year Ended December 31, 2017 versus Year Ended December 31, 2016
Our gross profit margin increased to 62.6 percent in 2017 from 60.7 percent in 2016. The increase was primarily due to the impact of divestitures, partially offset by the unfavorable impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. Refer to Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information related to acquisitions and divestitures.




Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
The following table sets forth the significant components of selling, general and administrative expenses (in millions):
Year Ended December 31,2018
 2017
 2016
Stock-based compensation expense$225
 $219
 $258
Advertising expenses4,113
 3,958
 4,004
Selling and distribution expenses1,701
 3,266
 5,189
Other operating expenses4,268
 5,211
 5,919
Selling, general and administrative expenses$10,307
 $12,654
 $15,370
Year Ended December 31, 2018 versus Year Ended December 31, 2017
Year Ended December 31,20212020
Selling and distribution expenses$2,574 $2,638 
Advertising expenses4,098 2,777 
Stock-based compensation expense337 126 
Other operating expenses5,135 4,190 
Selling, general and administrative expenses$12,144 $9,731 
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $2,347increased $2,413 million, or 1925 percent, in 2021. This increase was primarily due to higher annual incentive and stock-based compensation expense, increased charitable donations and increased marketing spending, which was reduced in 2020 as a result of uncertainties associated with the COVID-19 pandemic. The increase in annual incentive and stock-based compensation expense was primarily due to improved financial performance in 2021 and a more favorable outlook of our future financial performance, which resulted in higher payout assumptions as compared to 2020. In 2021, foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations increased selling, general and administrative expenses by 2 percent.
The decrease in selling and distribution expenses during 2018 reflectswas primarily due to the continued impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on away-from-home channels, partially offset by the impact of refranchising activities throughout 2018 and the full year effect of refranchising activities that occurred during 2017. The decrease in other operating expenses during 2018 reflects savings from our productivity and reinvestment initiatives and the impact of refranchising activities throughout 2018 and the full year effect of refranchising activities that occurred during 2017. Refer to Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information related to divestitures.foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations.
As of December 31, 2018,2021, we had $271$335 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested stock-based compensation awards granted under our plans. This cost is expectedplans, which we expect to be recognizedrecognize over a weighted-average period of 2.51.9 years as stock-based compensation expense. This expected cost does not include the impact of any future stock-based compensation awards. Refer to Note 1312 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Year Ended December 31, 2017 versus Year Ended December 31, 2016
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $2,716 million, or 18 percent. During the year ended December 31, 2017, fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates had a nominal impact on selling, general and administrative expenses. The decrease in selling and distribution expenses and advertising expenses during 2017 reflects the impact of divestitures. Additionally, advertising expenses during 2017 decreased 1 percent as a result of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. The decrease in other operating expenses during 2017 reflects savings from our productivity and reinvestment initiatives. Foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations had a more significant impact on both advertising and other operating expenses as compared to our selling and distribution expenses since they were generally transacted in local currency. Our selling and distribution expenses were primarily related to our Company-owned bottling operations, of which the majority of expenses are attributable to CCR and were primarily denominated in U.S. dollars.



Other Operating Charges
Other operating charges incurred by operating segment and Corporate were as follows (in millions):
Year Ended December 31,2018
 2017
 2016
Year Ended December 31,20212020
Europe, Middle East & Africa$(3) $26
 $32
Europe, Middle East & Africa$141 $73 
Latin America4
 7
 74
Latin America11 29 
North America175
 241
 134
North America39 379 
Asia Pacific(4) 10
 1
Asia Pacific12 31 
Global VenturesGlobal Ventures 
Bottling Investments617
 1,079
 761
Bottling Investments 34 
Corporate290
 539
 369
Corporate643 303 
Total$1,079
 $1,902
 $1,371
Total$846 $853 
In 2018,2021, the Company recorded other operating charges of $1,079$846 million. These charges primarily consisted of $450 million of CCR asset impairments and $440$369 million related to the Company'sremeasurement of our contingent consideration liability to fair value in conjunction with the fairlife acquisition, $146 million related to the Company’s strategic realignment initiatives, $119 million related to the BodyArmor acquisition, which includes various transition and transaction costs, distributor termination fees, employee retention costs and the amortization of noncompete agreements, and $115 million related to the Company’s productivity and reinvestment program. In addition, other operating charges included $139an impairment charge of $78 million related to costs incurreda trademark in Europe, which was driven by a change in the long-term outlook on the licensing arrangement for a certain brand, charges of $15 million related to refranchise certaintax litigation and a net charge of $4 million related to the restructuring of our North America bottling operations.manufacturing operations in the United States.
In 2020, the Company recorded other operating charges of $853 million. These costs include, amongcharges primarily consisted of $413 million related to the Company’s strategic realignment initiatives and $99 million related to the Company’s productivity and reinvestment program. In addition, other items, internaloperating charges included impairment charges of $160 million related to the Odwalla trademark and external costs for individuals directly working oncharges of $33 million related to discontinuing the refranchising efforts, severance, and costs associated with the implementation of information technology systems to facilitate consistent data standards and availability throughout our bottling systems.Odwalla juice business. Other operating charges also included $33an impairment charge of $55 million related to tax litigation expensea trademark in North America, which was driven by the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, revised projections of future operating results and $19a change in brand focus in the Company’s portfolio. In addition, other operating charges included $51 million related to noncapitalizable transaction costs associatedthe remeasurement of our contingent consideration liability to
46


fair value in conjunction with pendingthe fairlife acquisition and closed transactions. $16 million related to the restructuring of our manufacturing operations in the United States.
Refer to Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the refranchising of our bottling operations.BodyArmor and fairlife acquisitions. Refer to Note 1211 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information related to the tax litigation. Refer to Note 17 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for information on how the Company determined the asset impairment charges. Refer to Note 1916 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the Company'simpairment charges. Refer to Note 18 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the Company’s strategic realignment initiatives and productivity and reinvestment program. Refer to Note 2019 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the impact these charges had on our operating segments and Corporate.
In 2017, the Company recorded other operating charges of $1,902 million. These charges primarily consisted of $737 million of CCR asset impairments and $534 million related to the Company's productivity and reinvestment program. In addition, other operating charges included $280 million related to costs incurred to refranchise certain of our bottling operations. Other operating charges also included $225 million related to a cash contribution we made to The Coca-Cola Foundation, $67 million related to tax litigation expense, $34 million related to impairments of Venezuelan intangible assets and $19 million related to noncapitalizable transaction costs associated with pending and closed transactions. Refer to Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information about the Venezuelan intangible assets. Refer to Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the refranchising of our bottling operations. Refer to Note 17 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for information on how the Company determined the asset impairment charges. Refer to Note 19 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the Company's productivity and reinvestment program. Refer to Note 20 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the impact these charges had on our operating segments and Corporate.
In 2016, the Company recorded other operating charges of $1,371 million. These charges primarily consisted of $352 million due to the Company's productivity and reinvestment program and $240 million due to the integration of our German bottling operations. In addition, the Company recorded charges of $276 million related to costs incurred to refranchise certain of our bottling operations. The Company also recorded a charge of $200 million related to cash contributions we made to The Coca‑Cola Foundation, a charge of $76 million due to the write-down we recorded related to our receivables from our bottling partner in Venezuela as a result of changes in exchange rates and charges of $41 million related to noncapitalizable transaction costs associated with pending and closed transactions. In 2016, the Company also recorded impairment charges of $153 million related to certain intangible assets. Refer to Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the Venezuelan exchange rates. Refer to Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the refranchising of our bottling operations. Refer to Note 17 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the impairment charges. Refer to Note 19 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the Company's productivity, integration and restructuring initiatives. Refer to Note 20 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the impact these charges had on our operating segments and Corporate.





Operating Income and Operating Margin
Information about our operating income contribution by operating segment and Corporate on a percentage basis is as follows:
Year Ended December 31,20212020
Europe, Middle East & Africa36.2 %36.8 %
Latin America24.6 23.5 
North America32.3 27.5 
Asia Pacific22.6 23.7 
Global Ventures2.8 (1.4)
Bottling Investments4.6 3.4 
Corporate(23.1)(13.5)
Total100.0 %100.0 %
Year Ended December 31,2018
 2017
 2016
Europe, Middle East & Africa42.7% 47.7% 42.4%
Latin America26.7
 29.2
 22.6
North America28.2
 34.1
 30.2
Asia Pacific26.2
 28.3
 25.5
Bottling Investments(7.5) (12.7) 0.0
Corporate(16.3) (26.6) (20.7)
Total100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Operating margin is a ratio calculated by dividing operating income by net operating revenues. Management believes operating margin provides investors with useful information related to the profitability of our business after considering all of the operating costs incurred. Management uses this measure in making financial, operating and planning decisions and in evaluating the Company’s performance.
Information about our operating margin on a consolidated basis and by operating segment and Corporate is as follows:
Year Ended December 31,20212020
Consolidated26.7 %27.3 %
Europe, Middle East & Africa56.9 59.9 
Latin America61.2 60.5 
North America25.3 21.5 
Asia Pacific49.7 50.6 
Global Ventures10.5 (6.2)
Bottling Investments6.6 4.9 
Corporate**
Year Ended December 31,2018
 2017
 2016
Consolidated27.3% 21.5% 20.7%
Europe, Middle East & Africa48.2
 49.2
 52.3
Latin America58.4
 56.1
 52.1
North America21.3
 29.5
 39.7
Asia Pacific47.4
 45.0
 46.2
Bottling Investments(17.2) (9.3) 0.0
Corporate*
 *
 *
*    Calculation is not meaningful.
*Calculation is not meaningful.
Year Ended December 31, 2018 versus Year Ended December 31, 2017Operating income was $10,308 million in 2021, compared to $8,997 million in 2020, an increase of $1,311 million, or 15 percent. The increase in operating income was primarily driven by concentrate sales volume growth of 9 percent, favorable channel and package mix, effective cost management and a favorable currency exchange rate impact, partially offset by higher annual incentive and stock-based compensation expense, increased charitable donations and increased marketing spending.
In 2018,2021, fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates unfavorablyfavorably impacted consolidated operating income by 62 percent due to a strongerweaker U.S. dollar compared to certain foreign currencies, including the Argentine peso, Mexican peso, Brazilian realChinese yuan and Australian dollar,British pound sterling, which had an unfavorablea favorable impact on our Latin AmericaAmerica; Asia Pacific; Europe, Middle East and Asia PacificAfrica; and Global Ventures operating segments. The unfavorablefavorable impact of a strongerweaker U.S. dollar compared to the currencies listed above was partially offset by the impact of a weakerstronger U.S. dollar compared to certain other foreign currencies, including the euro, British pound sterling,Argentine peso, Brazilian real, Turkish lira and Japanese yen, and South African rand, which had a favorablean unfavorable impact on our Latin America; Europe, Middle East and AfricaAfrica; and Asia Pacific operating segments. Refer to the heading "Liquidity,“Liquidity, Capital Resources and Financial Position — Foreign Exchange"Exchange” below.
Operating income forThe Company’s Europe, Middle East and Africa operating segment reported operating income of $3,735 million and $3,313 million for the years ended December 31, 20182021 and 20172020, respectively. The increase in operating income was $3,714primarily
47





driven by a 12 percent increase in concentrate sales volume, favorable channel and package mix, and a favorable foreign currency exchange rate impact of 2 percent, partially offset by higher annual incentive expense, increased marketing spending and higher other operating charges.
Latin America reported operating income of $2,534 million and $3,625$2,116 million respectively. Operating income growth for the segment reflectsyears ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. The increase in operating income was primarily driven by concentrate sales volume growth of 6 percent, favorable pricing initiatives, favorable channel and favorable price, product and geographicpackage mix, and lower other operating charges, partially offset by higher annual incentive expense and increased marketing investmentsspending.
Operating income for North America for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 was $3,331 million and $2,471 million, respectively. The increase in operating income was primarily related to key product launchesdriven by concentrate sales volume growth of 7 percent, favorable pricing initiatives, favorable channel and an unfavorablecategory mix, effective cost management and lower other operating charges, partially offset by higher annual incentive expense and increased marketing spending.
Asia Pacific’s operating income for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 was $2,325 million and $2,133 million, respectively. The increase in operating income was primarily driven by concentrate sales volume growth of 11 percent, a favorable foreign currency exchange rate impact of 5 percent.4 percent and lower other operating charges, partially offset by higher annual incentive expense and increased marketing spending.
OperatingGlobal Ventures’ operating income for the Latin America segmentyear ended December 31, 2021 was $293 million, while the operating segment’s operating loss for the year ended December 31, 2020 was $123 million. The change in operating income was primarily driven by revenue growth as a result of the reopening of Costa retail stores in the United Kingdom and a favorable foreign currency exchange rate impact of 6 percent.
Bottling Investments’ operating income for the years ended December 31, 20182021 and 20172020 was $2,321$473 million and $2,218$308 million, respectively. OperatingThe increase in operating income was primarily driven by volume growth for the segment reflectsof 11 percent, lower other operating charges and favorable price, category and productpackage mix, and growth in concentrate sales volume of 1 percent, partially offset by an unfavorable foreign currency exchange rate impact of 121 percent.
North America's operating income for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 was $2,453 million and $2,591 million, respectively. The decrease in operating income was driven by higher freight costs and the impact of structural changes, partially offset by lower other operating charges. The operating margin decrease in 2018 was primarily related to the adoption of the new revenue recognition accounting standard. Refer to Note 3 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Operating income for Asia Pacific for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 was $2,278 million and $2,147 million, respectively. Operating income growth for the segment reflects concentrate sales volume growth of 4 percent. Foreign currency exchange rates had a nominal impact.
Our Bottling Investments segment'sCorporate’s operating loss for the years ended December 31, 20182021 and 20172020 was $649$2,383 million and $962$1,221 million, respectively. The decrease in operating loss reflects lower other operating charges, partially offset by the unfavorable impact of divestitures.


Corporate's operating loss for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 was $1,417 million and $2,020 million, respectively. The operatingOperating loss in 2018 was favorably impacted by lower selling, general and administrative expenses2021 increased primarily as a result of productivity initiatives, lower other operating chargeshigher annual incentive and mark-to-market adjustments related to our economic hedging activities.    
Based on current spot ratesstock-based compensation expense, increased marketing spending, increased charitable donations and our hedging coverage in place, we expect currencies will have an unfavorable impact on operating income in 2019. 
Year Ended December 31, 2017 versus Year Ended December 31, 2016
In 2017, fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates unfavorably impacted consolidated operating income by 3 percent due to a stronger U.S. dollar compared to certain foreign currencies, including the British pound sterling, Japanese yen, Argentine peso and Mexican peso, which had an unfavorable impact on our Europe, Middle East and Africa, Asia Pacific and Latin America operating segments. The unfavorable impact of a stronger U.S. dollar compared to the currencies listed above was partially offset by the impact of a weaker U.S. dollar compared to certain other foreign currencies, including the euro, South African rand, Australian dollar and Brazilian real, which had a favorable impact on our Europe, Middle East and Africa, Asia Pacific and Latin America operating segments. Refer to the heading "Liquidity, Capital Resources and Financial Position — Foreign Exchange" below.
Operating income for Europe, Middle East and Africa for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $3,625 million and $3,668 million, respectively. Operating income for the segment reflects an unfavorable foreign currency exchange rate impact of 3 percent, partially offset by favorable price, product and geographic mix.
Operating income for the Latin America segment for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $2,218 million and $1,953 million, respectively. Operating income for the segment reflects favorable price mix, a reduction in other operating charges and a nominal impact from foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations.
North America's operating income for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $2,591 million and $2,614 million, respectively. The decrease in the segment's operating income was due to higher other operating charges and an unfavorable foreign currency exchange rate impact of 1 percent, partially offset by favorable price and product and package mix.
Operating income for Asia Pacific for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $2,147 million and $2,210 million, respectively. The decline in operating income for the segment reflects an unfavorable foreign currency exchange rate impact of 6 percent and unfavorable price, product and geographic mix.
Our Bottling Investments segment's operating loss for the year ended December 31, 2017 was $962 million, compared to operating income for the year ended December 31, 2016 of $1 million. The Bottling Investments segment was unfavorably impacted by acquisitions and divestitures and $737 million of asset impairment charges related to CCR in 2017.
Corporate's operating loss for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $2,020 million and $1,789 million, respectively. The operating loss in 2017 was unfavorably impacted by higher other operating charges.
Interest Income
Year EndedDecember 31, 2018 versus Year EndedDecember 31, 2017
Interest income was $682$276 million in 2018,2021, compared to $677$370 million in 2017, an increase2020, a decrease of $5$94 million, or 125 percent. The increaseThis decrease was primarily reflects higher interest rates earned on certain investments, partially offsetdriven by lower investment balances in certain of our international locations.
Year Ended December 31, 2017 versus Year Ended December 31, 2016
Interest income was $677 million in 2017, compared to $642 million in 2016, an increase of $35 million, or 6 percent. The increase primarily reflects higher investment balancesinterest rates in certain of our international locations partially offset byas well as lower interest rates earned on certain investments.investment balances.
Interest Expense
Year EndedDecember 31, 2018 versus Year EndedDecember 31, 2017
Interest expense was $919$1,597 million in 2018,2021, compared to $841$1,437 million in 2017,2020, an increase of $78$160 million, or 911 percent. This increase was primarily due to the impactcharges of higher short-term U.S. interest rates, which was partially offset by a net gain$650 million in 2021 versus charges of $27$484 million related toin 2020 associated with the early extinguishment of certain long-term debt. Refer to the heading "Liquidity, Capital Resources and Financial Position — Cash Flows from Financing Activities — Debt Financing" below and Note 1110 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information related to the Company's long-term debt.Statements.




Year EndedDecember 31, 2017 versus Year EndedDecember 31, 2016
Interest expense was $841 million in 2017, compared to $733 million in 2016, an increase of $108 million, or 15 percent. The increase primarily reflects the impact of short-term U.S. interest rates and longer debt maturities, both of which resulted in higher interest rates on the Company's debt portfolio. Additionally, interest expense during the year ended December 31, 2017 included a net charge of $38 million due to the early extinguishment of certain long-term debt. Refer to the heading "Liquidity, Capital Resources and Financial Position — Cash Flows from Financing Activities — Debt Financing" below and Note 11 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information related to the Company's long-term debt.
Equity Income (Loss) — Net
Year EndedDecember 31, 2018 versus Year EndedDecember 31, 2017
Equity income (loss) — net represents our Company'sCompany’s proportionate share of net income or loss from each of our equity method investees. In 2018,2021, equity income was $1,008$1,438 million, compared to equity income of $1,071$978 million in 2017, a decrease2020, an increase of $63$460 million, or 647 percent. This decreaseincrease reflects, among other things,items, the dissolutionimpact of more favorable operating results reported by most of our BPW joint venture andequity method investees in 2021, as results in 2020 were more negatively impacted by the consolidation of CCBA.COVID-19 pandemic, along with a favorable foreign currency exchange rate impact. In addition, the Company recorded net charges of $111$13 million and $92$216 million in the line item equity income (loss) — net during the years ended December 31, 20182021 and December 31, 2017, respectively. These amounts2020, respectively, which represent the Company'sCompany’s proportionate share of significant operating and nonoperating items recorded by certain of our equity method investees. Refer to Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
Year Ended December 31, 2017 versus Year EndedDecember 31, 2016
48
In 2017, equity income was $1,071 million, compared to equity income of $835 million in 2016, an increase of $236 million, or 28 percent. This increase reflects, among other items, more favorable operating results reported by several of our equity method investees. Additionally, the increase was attributable to the impact of the equity investment in CCEP acquired in 2016 and the impact of the equity investment in AC Bebidas, S. de R.L. de C.V. ("AC Bebidas") that was acquired in 2017. The favorable impact of these items was partially offset by the derecognition of the Company's former equity method investment in South Africa in 2016. Refer to Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.





Other Income (Loss) — Net
Other income (loss) — net includes, among other things, the impact of foreign currency exchange gains and losses; dividend income; rental income; gains and losses related to the disposal of property, plant and equipment; gains and losses related to business combinationsacquisitions and disposals;divestitures; non-service cost components of net periodic benefit cost or income for pension and other postretirement benefit plans; other benefit plan charges and credits;credits related to pension and other postretirement benefit plans; realized and unrealized gains and losses on equity securities and trading debt securities; and realized gains and losses on available-for-sale debt securities.securities; other-than-temporary impairment charges; and net foreign currency exchange gains and losses. The foreign currency exchange gains and losses are primarily the result of the remeasurement of monetary assets and liabilities from certain currencies into functional currencies. The effects of the remeasurement of these assets and liabilities are partially offset by the impact of our economic hedging program for certain exposures on our consolidated balance sheets.sheet. Refer to Note 65 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
In 2018,2021, other income (loss) — net was a lossincome of $1,121$2,000 million. The Company recorded other-than-temporary impairment chargesrecognized a gain of $591$834 million in conjunction with the BodyArmor acquisition, a net gain of $695 million related to certainthe sale of our ownership interest in Coca-Cola Amatil Limited (“CCA”), an equity method investeesinvestee, to CCEP, also an equity method investee, and a net gain of $114 million related to the sale of our ownership interest in an equity method investee and the sale of a portion of our ownership interest in another equity method investee. Additionally, the Company recognized a net gain of $467 million related to realized and unrealized gains and losses on equity securities and trading debt securities as well as realized gains and losses on available-for-sale debt securities. Additionally, other income (loss) — net included income of $277 million related to the non-service cost components of net periodic benefit income and dividend income of $73 million. Other income (loss) — net also included charges of $476$266 million duerelated to the refranchisingrestructuring of certain bottling territoriesour manufacturing operations in North America.the United States, pension plan settlement charges of $117 million related to our strategic realignment initiatives and net foreign currency exchange losses of $61 million.
In 2020, other income (loss) — net was income of $841 million. The Company also recordedrecognized a gain of $902 million in conjunction with the fairlife acquisition, which resulted from the remeasurement of our previously held equity interest in fairlife to fair value, a net lossgain of $278$148 million related to realized and unrealized gains and losses on equity securities and trading debt securities as well as realized gains and losses on available-for-sale debt securities, and chargesa net gain of $240$35 million related to the sale of our ownership interest in an equity method investee and the sale of a portion of our ownership interest in another equity method investee. These gains were partially offset by an other-than-temporary impairment charge of $252 million related to CCBJHI, an equity method investee, an other-than-temporary impairment charge of $38 million related to one of our equity method investees in Latin America, an impairment charge of $26 million associated with an investment in an equity security without a readily determinable fair value and a net loss of $55 million related to economic hedging activities. The Company also recorded net charges of $25 million related to the restructuring of our manufacturing operations in the United States and charges of $14 million for pension settlements.and other postretirement benefit plan settlements and curtailments related to the Company’s strategic realignment initiatives. Other income (loss) — net also included income of $171 million related to the non-service cost components of net periodic benefit income, $72 million of dividend income and net foreign currency exchange losses of $144$64 million. Additionally, we recorded charges
Refer to Note 2 of $34 million primarily relatedNotes to payments made to convert the bottling agreementsConsolidated Financial Statements for certain North America bottling partners' territories to a single form of CBA with additional requirements, a net loss of $33 million primarily related to the reversal of the cumulative translation adjustments resulting from the substantial liquidation of the Company's former Russian juice operations and a $32 million loss related to acquiring a controlling interest in the Philippine bottling operations. These charges were partially offset by a net gain of $296 million related toinformation on the sale of our equity ownership interest in Corporación Lindley S.A. ("Lindley")CCA and a net gain of $47 million related to the refranchising of our Latin American bottling operations.BodyArmor and fairlife acquisitions. Refer to Note 1 and Note 4 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on equity and debt securities. Refer to Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on refranchising activities, North America conversion payments, the sale of our equity ownership in Lindley and the acquisition of a controlling interest in the Philippine bottling operations. Refer to Note 65 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on our economic hedging activities. Refer to Note 1716 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the restructuring of our manufacturing operations in the United States and the impairment charges. Refer to Note 2018 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the Company’s strategic realignment initiatives. Refer to Note 19 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the impact these items had on our operating segments and Corporate.


In 2017, other income (loss) — net was a loss of $1,764 million. The Company recognized a net charge of $2,140 million due to the refranchising of certain bottling territories in North America and charges of $313 million primarily related to payments made to convert the bottling agreements for certain North America bottling partners' territories to a single form of CBA with additional requirements. The Company also recorded net charges of $255 million resulting from special termination benefits and curtailment credits primarily related to North America refranchising and the Company's productivity and reinvestment program. Additionally, the Company recorded an other-than-temporary impairment charge of $50 million related to one of our international equity method investees, primarily driven by foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. The Company also incurred a charge of $26 million related to our former German bottling operations. These charges were partially offset by a gain of $445 million related to the integration of Coca-Cola West Co., Ltd. ("CCW") and Coca-Cola East Japan Co., Ltd. ("CCEJ") to establish CCBJHI. In exchange for our previously existing equity interests in CCW and CCEJ, we received an approximate 17 percent equity interest in CCBJHI. The Company also recognized a gain of $150 million related to the remeasurement of our previously held equity interests in CCBA and its South African subsidiary to fair value upon consolidation of CCBA. Additionally, the Company recognized a gain of $88 million related to the refranchising of our China bottling operations and the sale of a related cost method investment and a gain of $25 million as a result of Coca-Cola FEMSA, an equity method investee, issuing additional shares of its stock during the period at a per share amount greater than the carrying value of the Company's per share investment. Other income (loss) — net also included net gains of $88 million related to trading securities and the sale of available-for-sale securities and $71 million of dividend income, partially offset by net foreign currency exchange losses of $57 million. Refer to Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the North America and China bottling refranchising, the conversion payments and our consolidation of CCBA. Refer to Note 20 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the impact these items had on our operating segments and Corporate.
In 2016, other income (loss) — net was a loss of $1,265 million. This loss included losses of $2,456 million due to the refranchising of certain bottling territories in North America and a net charge of $139 million resulting from special termination benefits and curtailment credits primarily related to North America refranchising and the Company's productivity and reinvestment program. The Company also recorded a loss of $21 million due to the deconsolidation of our South African bottling operations and disposal of the related equity method investment in exchange for investments in CCBA and CCBA's South African subsidiary. The Company incurred charges of $31 million related to payments made to convert the bottling agreements for certain North America bottling partners' territories to a single form of CBA with additional requirements. Additionally, the Company incurred net foreign currency exchange losses of $246 million, including a charge of $72 million as a result of remeasuring its net monetary assets denominated in Egyptian pounds. The Egyptian pound devalued as a result of the central bank allowing its currency, which was previously pegged to the U.S. dollar, to float freely. These losses were partially offset by a gain of $1,323 million due to the deconsolidation of our German bottling operations, dividend income of $55 million and net gains of $83 million related to trading securities and the sale of available-for-sale securities. Refer to Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the North America refranchising, the deconsolidation of our South African bottling operations, the conversion payments and the deconsolidation of our German bottling operations. Refer to Note 20 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the impact these items had on our operating segments and Corporate.
Income Taxes
Our effective tax rate reflects the tax benefits of having significant operations outside the United States, which are generally taxed at rates lower than the statutory U.S. statutory rate. As a result of employment actions and capital investments made by the Company, certain tax jurisdictions provide income tax incentive grants, including Brazil, Costa Rica, Singapore and Swaziland.Eswatini. The terms of these grants expire from 20192023 to 2036.2036. We anticipate that we will be able to extend or renew the grants in these locations. Tax incentive grants favorably impacted our income tax expense by $318$381 million, $221 and $317 million and $105 million for the years ended December 31, 2018, 20172021 and 2016,2020, respectively. In addition, our effective tax rate reflects the benefits of having significant earnings generated in investments accounted for under the equity method of accounting, which are generally taxed at rates lower than the U.S. statutory rate.method.

49














A reconciliation of the statutory U.S. federal tax rate and our effective tax rate is as follows:
Year Ended December 31,20212020
Statutory U.S. federal tax rate21.0 %21.0 %
State and local income taxes — net of federal benefit1.1 1.1 
Earnings in jurisdictions taxed at rates different from the statutory U.S. federal tax rate2.3 10.9 3
Equity income or loss(2.0)(1.4)
Excess tax benefits on stock-based compensation(0.5)(0.8)
Other — net(0.8)2(0.5)4,5
Effective tax rate21.1 %20.3 %
Year Ended December 31,2018

2017

2016
 
Statutory U.S. federal tax rate21.0 %
35.0 %
35.0 %
State and local income taxes — net of federal benefit1.5

1.2

1.2

Earnings in jurisdictions taxed at rates different from the statutory U.S.
federal tax rate
1.2
1,2 
(9.7)
(17.5)
7 
Equity income or loss(2.4)
(3.4)
(3.0)
Tax Reform Act0.1
3 
53.5
4 


Excess tax benefits on stock-based compensation(1.2) (2.0) 
 
Other — net(0.8)
7.9
5,6 
3.8
8 
Effective tax rate19.4 %
82.5 %
19.5 %
1 Includes the impact of pretaxnet tax charges of $591$375 million (or a 1.53.0 percent impact on our effective tax rate) related to other-than-temporary impairments of certain of our equity method investees. Refer to Note 17 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
2 Includeschanges in tax expense of $28 million on net pretax charges of $403 million (or a 1.4 percent impact on our effective tax rate) primarily related to the refranchising oflaws in certain foreign bottling operations. Refer to Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
3 Includes net tax expense of $8 million (or a 0.1 percent impact on our effective tax rate) related to the finalization of our accounting related to the Tax Reform Act.
4 Includes net tax expense of $3,610 million primarily related to our reasonable estimate of the one-time transition tax resulting from the Tax Reform Act that was signed into law on December 22, 2017, partially offset by the impact of the lower rate introduced by the Tax Reform Act on our existing deferred tax balances.
5 Includes net tax expense of $1,048 million on a pretax gain of $1,037 million (or a 10.2 percent impact on our effective tax rate) related to the refranchising of CCR's Southwest operating unit ("Southwest Transaction"), in conjunction with which we obtained an equity interest in AC Bebidas. The Company accounts for its interest in AC Bebidas as an equity method investment and the net tax expense was primarily the result of the deferred tax recorded on the basis difference in this investment. Refer to Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
6 Includes a $156 million net tax benefit related to the impact of manufacturing incentives and permanent book to tax adjustments.
7 Includes tax expense of $97 million related to a pretax gain of $1,323 million (or a 4.5 percent impact on our effective tax rate) related to
the deconsolidation of our German bottling operations. Refer to Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
8 Includes tax expense of $157 million (or a 1.9 percent impact on our effective tax rate) primarily related tojurisdictions, amounts required to be
recorded for changes to our uncertain tax positions, including interest and penalties, in various international jurisdictions, as well as other discrete items.
2 Includes a tax benefit of $14 million (or a 1.5 percent impact on our effective tax rate) associated with the $834 million gain recorded upon the acquisition of the remaining ownership interest in BodyArmor. Refer to Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
3 Includes net tax charges of $110 million (or a 1.1 percent impact on our effective tax rate) related to amounts required to be recorded for changes to our uncertain tax positions, including interest and penalties, in various international jurisdictions, as well as other agreed-upon audit issues.
4 Includes net tax expense of $431 million (or a 4.4 percent impact on our effective tax rate) primarily related to changes in judgment on specific tax positions due to the Opinion and amounts required to be recorded for changes to other uncertain tax positions, including interest and penalties. Also includes a tax benefit of $107 million (or a 1.1 percent impact on our effective tax rate) related to changes in our assessment of certain valuation allowances and a net tax benefit of $135 million (or a 1.4 percent impact on our effective tax rate) related to domestic jurisdictions.return to provision adjustments and other tax items.

5 Includes a tax benefit of $40 million (or a 2.4 percent impact on our effective tax rate) associated with the $902 million gain recorded upon the acquisition of the remaining ownership interest in fairlife. Refer to Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
On November 18, 2020, the Tax Court issued the Opinion regarding the Company’s 2015 litigation with the IRS involving transfer pricing tax adjustments in which the court predominantly sided with the IRS. The Company disagrees with the Opinion and intends to vigorously defend its position. Refer to Note 11 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
As of December 31, 2018,2021, the gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits was $336$906 million. If the Company were to prevail on all uncertain tax positions, the net effect would be a benefit of $182$600 million, exclusive of any benefits related to interest and penalties. The remaining $154$306 million which was recorded as a deferred tax asset, primarily represents tax benefits that would be received in different tax jurisdictions in the event the Company did not prevail on all uncertain tax positions.
A reconciliation of the changes in the gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows (in millions):
Year Ended December 31,20212020
Balance of unrecognized tax benefits at beginning of year$915 $392 
Increase related to prior period tax positions9 528 1
Decrease related to prior period tax positions(50)(1)
Increase related to current period tax positions37 26 
Decrease related to settlements with taxing authorities(4)(19)
Effect of foreign currency translation(1)(11)
Balance of unrecognized tax benefits at end of year$906 $915 
Year Ended December 31,2018
 2017
 2016
 
Beginning balance of unrecognized tax benefits$331

$302

$168

Increase related to prior period tax positions11

18

163
1 
Decrease related to prior period tax positions(2)
(13)


Increase related to current period tax positions17

13

17

Decrease related to settlements with taxing authorities(4)


(40)
1 
Decrease due to lapse of the applicable statute of limitations





Increase (decrease) due to effect of foreign currency exchange rate changes(17)
11

(6)
Ending balance of unrecognized tax benefits$336

$331

$302

1The increase was primarily related to a change in judgment on certain tax positions due to the Opinion. Refer to Note 11 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
1
The net increase was primarily related to a change in judgment about one of the Company's tax positions as a result of receiving notification of a preliminary settlement of a Competent Authority matter with a foreign jurisdiction, a portion of which became certain later in the year. This change in position did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated statement of income during the year ended December 31, 2016, as it was partially offset by refunds to be received from the foreign jurisdiction.
The Company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in the line item income tax expense.taxes on our consolidated statement of income. The Company had $190 million, $177$453 million and $142$391 million in interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits accrued as of December 31, 2018, 20172021 and 2016,2020, respectively. Of these amounts, $13 million, $35expense of $62 million and $31$190 million of expense werewas recognized through income tax expense in 2018, 20172021 and 2016,2020, respectively. If the Company were to prevail on all uncertain tax positions, the reversal of this accrual would also be a benefit to the Company'sCompany’s effective tax rate.


Based on current tax laws, the Company'sCompany’s effective tax rate in 20192022 is expected to be approximately 19.520 percent before considering the potential impact of any significant operating and nonoperating items that may affect our effective tax rate.
50





Liquidity, Capital Resources and Financial Position
We believe our ability to generate cash flows from operating activities is one of the fundamental strengths of our fundamental financial strengths.business. Refer to the heading "Cash“Cash Flows from Operating Activities"Activities” below. The near-term outlook for our business remains strong, and we expect to generate substantial cash flows from operations in 2019. As a result of our expected cash flows from operations, we have significant flexibility to meet our financial commitments. The Company does not typically raise capital through the issuance of stock. Instead, we use debt financing to lower our overall cost of capital and increase our return on shareowners'shareowners’ equity. Refer to the heading "Cash“Cash Flows from Financing Activities"Activities” below. We have a history of borrowing funds both domestically and continueinternationally at reasonable interest rates, and we expect to have the abilitybe able to continue to borrow funds domestically at reasonable interest rates. In addition, our domestic entities have recently borrowed and continue torates over the long term. Our debt financing also includes the use of a commercial paper program. We currently have the ability to borrow funds in international marketsthis market at reasonable interest rates. Ourlevels that are consistent with our debt financing includesstrategy and expect to continue to be able to do so in the use of an extensive commercial paper program as part of our overall cash management strategy. future.
The Company reviews its optimal mix of short-term and long-term debt regularly and, may replaceas a result of this review, during 2021 we issued U.S. dollar- and euro-denominated long-term notes of $6.0 billion and €3.2 billion, respectively, across various maturities. We used a portion of the proceeds from these issuances to extinguish certain amountstranches of commercial paper,our previously issued long-term debt. Refer to Note 10 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on these issuances and extinguishments.
The Company’s cash, cash equivalents, short-term debtinvestments and current maturitiesmarketable securities totaled $12.6 billion as of long-term debt with new issuances of long-term debt in the future.December 31, 2021. In addition to the Company's cash balances,these funds, our commercial paper program and our ability to issue long-term debt, we also had $7,895 million$8.1 billion in unused backup lines of credit for general corporate purposes as of December 31, 2018.2021. These backup lines of credit expire at various times from 20192022 through 2022.2027.
While uncertainties caused by the COVID-19 pandemic remain, we expect to continue to see improvements in our business as vaccines become more widely available. The timing and availability of vaccines will be different around the world, and therefore we believe the pace of the recovery will vary by geography depending on vaccine availability, rates of vaccination and the effectiveness of vaccines against existing and new variants of the virus, along with other macroeconomic factors. We will remain flexible so that we can adjust to uncertainties resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic. Our current capital allocation priorities are as follows: investing wisely to support our business operations, continuing to grow our dividend payment, enhancing our beverage portfolio and capabilities through opportunistic and disciplined acquisitions, and using excess cash to repurchase shares over time. We currently expect 2022 capital expenditures to be approximately $1.5 billion. During 2022, we also expect to repurchase approximately $500 million of shares in addition to repurchasing shares equivalent to the proceeds from the issuances of stock under our stock-based compensation plans.
We have significant operations outsideare currently in litigation with the United States. Unit case volume outside the United States represented 82 percent of the Company's worldwide unit case volume in 2018. We earn a substantial amount of our consolidated operating income and income from continuing operations before income taxes from foreign subsidiaries that either sell concentrates and syrups to our local bottling partners or, in certain instances, sell finished products directly to our customers to fulfill the demand for Company beverage products outside the United States. A significant portion of these foreign earnings was previously considered to be indefinitely reinvested in foreign jurisdictions where the Company has made, and will continue to make, substantial investments to support the ongoing development and growth of our international operations. Accordingly, no U.S. federal and state income taxes were previously provided on the portion of our foreign earnings that was considered to be indefinitely reinvested in foreign jurisdictions. On December 22, 2017, the Tax Reform Act was signed into law. The Tax Reform Act reduces the U.S. federal corporate tax rate from 35.0 percent to 21.0 percent effectiveIRS for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, transitions2007 through 2009. On November 18, 2020, the U.S. methodTax Court issued the Opinion in which it predominantly sided with the IRS; however, a final decision is still pending and the timing of taxation from a worldwide tax systemsuch decision is not currently known. The Company strongly disagrees with the IRS’ positions and the portions of the Opinion affirming such positions and intends to a modified territorial system and requires companies to pay a one-time transition tax over a periodvigorously defend our positions utilizing every available avenue of eight years on the mandatory deemed repatriation of prescribed foreign earnings as of December 31, 2017. As a result,appeal. While the Company recognized a provisionalbelieves that it is more likely than not that we will ultimately prevail in this litigation upon appeal, it is possible that all, or some portion of, the adjustments proposed by the IRS and sustained by the Tax Court could ultimately be upheld. In the event that all of the adjustments proposed by the IRS are ultimately upheld for tax charge relatedyears 2007 through 2009 and the IRS, with the consent of the federal courts, were to decide to apply the Tax Court Methodology to the one-time transitionsubsequent years up to and including 2021, the Company currently estimates that the potential aggregate incremental tax in the amount of $4.6 billion in 2017. During 2018, we recognized $0.3 billion of additional provisional transition tax expense. The Company's cash, cash equivalents, short-term investments and marketable securities held by our foreign subsidiaries totaled $14.4interest liability could be approximately $13 billion as of December 31, 2018.2021. Additional income tax and interest would continue to accrue until the time any such potential liability, or portion thereof, were to be paid. Once the Tax Court renders a final decision, the Company will have 90 days to file a notice of appeal and pay the portion of the potential aggregate incremental tax and interest liability related to the 2007 through 2009 tax years, which we currently estimate to be approximately $4.9 billion (including interest accrued through December 31, 2021), plus any additional interest accrued through the time of payment. Refer to Note 11 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the tax litigation.
Net operating revenuesWhile we believe it is more likely than not that we will prevail in the United States were $11.3 billion in 2018, or 36 percent of the Company's consolidated net operating revenues. We expect existing domestic cash, cash equivalents, short-term investments, marketable securities,tax litigation discussed above, we are confident that, between our ability to generate cash flows from operations, the repatriation of foreign earnings and the issuance of debt to continue to be sufficient to fund our domestic operating activities and cash commitments for investing and financing activities. In addition,our ability to borrow funds at reasonable interest rates, we expect foreign cash, cash equivalents, short-term investments and marketable securities remaining after repatriation, as well as cash flows from operations to continue to be sufficient to fund our foreign operating activities and cash commitments for investing activities.can manage the range of possible outcomes in the final resolution of the matter.
Based on all of the aforementioned factors, the Company believes its current liquidity position is strong and we will continue to meet all ofbe sufficient to fund our financialoperating activities and cash commitments for investing and financing activities for the foreseeable future. These obligations and anticipated cash outflows include, but are not limited to, regular quarterly dividends, debt maturities, capital expenditures, share repurchases and obligations included under the heading "Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Aggregate Contractual Obligations" below.
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
As part of our continued efforts to improve our working capital efficiency, we have worked with our suppliers over the past several years to revisit terms and conditions, including the extension of payment terms. Our current payment terms with the majority of our suppliers are 120 days. Additionally, two global financial institutions offer a voluntary supply chain finance (“SCF”) program which enables our suppliers, at their sole discretion, to sell their receivables from the Company to these
51





financial institutions on a non-recourse basis at a rate that leverages our credit rating and thus may be more beneficial to them. The SCF program is available to suppliers of goods and services included in cost of goods sold as well as suppliers of goods and services included in selling, general and administrative expenses in our consolidated statement of income. The Company and our suppliers agree on the contractual terms for the goods and services we procure, including prices, quantities and payment terms, regardless of whether the supplier elects to participate in the SCF program. The suppliers sell goods or services, as applicable, to the Company and issue the associated invoices to the Company based on the agreed-upon contractual terms. Then, if they are participating in the SCF program, our suppliers, at their sole discretion, determine which invoices, if any, they want to sell to the financial institutions. Our suppliers’ voluntary inclusion of invoices in the SCF program has no bearing on our payment terms. No guarantees are provided by the Company or any of our subsidiaries under the SCF program. We have no economic interest in a supplier’s decision to participate in the SCF program, and we have no direct financial relationship with the financial institutions, as it relates to the SCF program. Accordingly, amounts due to our suppliers that elected to participate in the SCF program are included in the line item accounts payable and accrued expenses in our consolidated balance sheet. All activity related to amounts due to suppliers that elected to participate in the SCF program is reflected within the operating activities section of our consolidated statement of cash flows. We have been informed by the financial institutions that as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, suppliers had elected to sell $882 million and $703 million, respectively, of our outstanding payment obligations to the financial institutions. The amounts settled through the SCF program were $3,237 million and $2,810 million during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. We do not believe there is a risk that our payment terms will be shortened in the near future.
In the fourth quarter of 2020, the Company started a trade accounts receivable factoring program in certain countries. Under this program we can elect to sell trade accounts receivables to unaffiliated financial institutions at a discount. In these factoring arrangements, for ease of administration, the Company collects customer payments related to the factored receivables and remits those payments to the financial institutions. The Company sold $6,266 million and $185 million of trade accounts receivables under this program during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively, and the costs of factoring such receivables were not material. The cash received from the financial institutions is classified within the operating activities section in our consolidated statement of cash flows.
Net cash provided by operating activities for the years ended December 31, 2018, 20172021 and 20162020 was $7,320 million, $6,930$12,625 million and $8,792$9,844 million, respectively.
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $390respectively, an increase of $2,781 million, or 6 percent, in 2018 compared to 2017.28 percent. This increase was primarily driven by increased operating income, growth and the efficient management of working capital partially offset by the impact of refranchising bottling operations and higher interest and tax payments. Refer to Note 11 and Note 15 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on interest payments and tax payments.
Net cash provided by operating activities decreased $1,862 million, or 21 percent, in 2017 compared to 2016. This decrease was primarily driven by the refranchising of certain bottling operations, the unfavorablewhich includes a benefit from our trade accounts receivable factoring program, a favorable impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, one less daylower annual incentive payments in 2017,2021 as a result of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our operating performance in 2020, lower payments in 2021 of prior year-end marketing accruals due to lower spending in 2020 as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, and increasedlower prepayments to customers in 2021. These items were partially offset by higher payments related to income taxes and restructuring. Refer to the heading


"Operations Review — Net Operating Revenues" above for additional information on the impact of foreign currency fluctuations. Refer to Note 15 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on theour strategic realignment initiatives along with higher tax payments.payments in 2021.
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Net cash provided by (used in)used in investing activities is summarized as follows (in millions):
Year Ended December 31,2018
 2017
 2016
Purchases of investments$(7,789) $(17,296) $(16,626)
Proceeds from disposals of investments14,977
 16,694
 17,842
Acquisitions of businesses, equity method investments and nonmarketable
   securities
(1,040) (3,809) (838)
Proceeds from disposals of businesses, equity method investments and
   nonmarketable securities
1,362
 3,821
 1,035
Purchases of property, plant and equipment(1,347) (1,675) (2,262)
Proceeds from disposals of property, plant and equipment245
 104
 150
Other investing activities(60) (93) (305)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities$6,348
 $(2,254) $(1,004)
was $2,765 million and $1,477 million in 2021 and 2020, respectively.
Purchases of Investments and Proceeds from Disposals of Investments
In 2018,2021, purchases of investments were $7,789$6,030 million and proceeds from disposals of investments were $14,977 million. This activity resulted$7,059 million, resulting in a net cash inflow of $7,188 million during 2018.$1,029 million. In 2017,2020, purchases of investments were $17,296$13,583 million and proceeds from disposals of investments were $16,694 million, resulting in a net cash outflow of $602 million. In 2016, purchases of investments were $16,626 million and proceeds from disposals of investments were $17,842$13,835 million, resulting in a net cash inflow of $1,216$252 million. The investments purchased in all three years include time deposits that had maturities greater than three months but less than one year and were classified in the line item short-term investments in our consolidated balance sheets. The disposals in 2016 included proceeds from the disposal of the Company's investment in Keurig Green Mountain, Inc. ("Keurig")of $2,380 million. The remainingThis activity primarily represents the purchases of, and proceeds from the disposals of, investments in marketable securities and short-term investments that were made as part of the Company'sCompany’s overall cash management strategy as well asstrategy. Also included in this activity are purchases of, and proceeds from the disposals of, investments held by our captive insurance captive investments. Refer to Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on our investment in Keurig.companies.
Acquisitions of Businesses, Equity Method Investments and Nonmarketable Securities
In 2018,2021, the Company'sCompany’s acquisitions of businesses, equity method investments and nonmarketable securities totaled $1,040$4,766 million, which was primarily related to the acquisition of a controllingthe remaining ownership interest in the Philippine bottling operations and an equity interest in BA Sports Nutrition, LLC ("BodyArmor"). Additionally, the Company acquired additional ownership interests in the Company's franchise bottlers in the United Arab Emirates and in Oman, both of which were previously equity method investees of the Company. As a result of the additional interest acquired in the Oman bottler, we obtained a controlling interest, resulting in its consolidation.BodyArmor.
In 2017,2020, the Company'sCompany’s acquisitions of businesses, equity method investments and nonmarketable securities totaled $3,809$1,052 million, which was primarily related to the transition of ABI's controlling interest in CCBA to the Company for $3,150 million. Additionally, in conjunction with the Southwest Transaction, we obtained an equity interest in AC Bebidas. The remaining activity was primarily related to the acquisition of AdeS, a plant-based beverage business, by the Company and several of its bottling partnersremaining ownership interest in Latin America, and the acquisition of the U.S. rights to the Topo Chico premium sparkling water brand from AC Bebidas, an equity method investee.
In 2016, the Company's acquisitions of businesses, equity method investments and nonmarketable securities totaled$838 million, which was primarily related to our acquisition of Xiamen Culiangwang Beverage Technology Co., Ltd., a maker of plant-based protein beverages in China, and a minority investment in CHI Limited, a Nigerian producer of value-added dairy and juice beverages.fairlife.
Refer to Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information related to our acquisitions during the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016.acquisitions.

52







Proceeds from Disposals of Businesses, Equity Method Investments and Nonmarketable Securities
In 2018,2021, proceeds from disposals of businesses, equity method investments and nonmarketable securities were $1,362$2,180 million, which primarily related to the proceeds from the refranchising of our Canadian and Latin American bottling operations as well as the the sale of our ownership interest in CCA, an equity ownership in Lindley.method investee, to CCEP, also an equity method investee.
In 2017,2020, proceeds from disposals of businesses, equity method investments and nonmarketable securities were $3,821$189 million, which primarily related to proceeds from the refranchising of certain bottling territories in North America and the refranchisingsale of our China bottling operations and related cost method investment.
In 2016, proceeds from disposals of businesses,ownership interest in Piedmont Coca-Cola Bottling Partnership to Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc., an equity method investments and nonmarketable securities were $1,035 million, primarily related to proceeds from the refranchising of certain bottling territories in North America.investee.
Refer to Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information related to our disposals during the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016.disposals.
Purchases of Property, Plant and Equipment
Purchases of property, plant and equipment net of disposals forduring the years ended December 31, 2018, 20172021 and 20162020 were $1,102 million, $1,571$1,367 million and $2,112$1,177 million, respectively.
Total capital expenditures for property, plant and equipment and the percentage of such totals by operating segment and Corporate were as follows (in millions):
Year Ended December 31,2018
 2017
 2016
Capital expenditures$1,347
 $1,675
 $2,262
Europe, Middle East & Africa5.7% 4.8% 2.7%
Latin America6.7
 3.3
 2.0
North America31.8
 32.3
 19.4
Asia Pacific2.3
 3.0
 4.7
Bottling Investments23.5
 39.5
 58.8
Corporate30.0
 17.1
 12.4
We expect our annual 2019 capital expenditures to be approximately $2.0 billion as we continue to make investments to enable growth in our business and further enhance our operational effectiveness. The increase in 2019 is primarily the result of the acquisition of Costa in January 2019 and the acquisition of a controlling interest in the Philippine bottling operations in December 2018.
Other Investing Activities
In 2016, cash used in other investing activities was primarily related to the cash flow impact of the Company's derivative contracts designated as net investment hedges and the purchases of trademarks.
Refer to Note 6 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the Company's derivative contracts designated as net investment hedges.
Year Ended December 31,20212020
Capital expenditures$1,367 $1,177 
Europe, Middle East & Africa2.6 %2.3 %
Latin America0.1 0.5 
North America16.7 15.5 
Asia Pacific4.8 1.7 
Global Ventures20.8 22.2 
Bottling Investments41.0 40.3 
Corporate14.0 17.6 
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Net cash provided by (used in)used in financing activities is summarized as follows (in millions):
Year Ended December 31,2018
 2017
 2016
Issuances of debt$27,339
 $29,857
 $27,281
Payments of debt(30,568) (28,768) (25,615)
Issuances of stock1,476
 1,595
 1,434
Purchases of stock for treasury(1,912) (3,682) (3,681)
Dividends(6,644) (6,320) (6,043)
Other financing activities(243) (91) 79
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities$(10,552) $(7,409) $(6,545)


was $6,786 million and $8,070 million in 2021 and 2020, respectively.
Debt Financing
Our Company maintains debt levels we consider prudent based on our cash flows, interest coverage ratio and percentage of debt to capital. We use debt financing to lower our overall cost of capital, which increases our return on shareowners'shareowners’ equity. This exposes us to adverse changes in interest rates. Our interest expense may also be affected by our credit ratings.
As of December 31, 2018,2021, our long-term debt was rated "A+"“A+” by Standard & Poor'sPoor’s and "A1"“A1” by Moody's.Moody’s. Our commercial paper program was rated "A-1"“A-1” by Standard & Poor'sPoor’s and "P-1"“P-1” by Moody's.Moody’s. In assessing our credit strength, both rating agencies consider our capital structure (including the amount and maturity dates of our debt) and financial policies as well as the consolidated balance sheet and other financial information of the Company. In addition, somecertain rating agencies also consider the financial information of certain bottlers, including CCEP, Coca-Cola Amatil Limited, Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. (formerly Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated), Coca-Cola FEMSA and Coca-Cola Hellenic. While the Company has no legal obligation for the debt of these bottlers, the rating agencies believe the strategic importance of the bottlers to the Company'sCompany’s business model provides the Company with an incentive to keep these bottlers viable. It is our expectation that the creditthese rating agencies will continue using this methodology. If our credit ratings were to be downgraded as a result of changes in our capital structure, our major bottlers'bottlers’ financial performance, changes in the credit rating agencies'agencies’ methodology in assessing our credit strength, or for any other reason, our cost of borrowing could increase. Additionally, if certain bottlers'bottlers’ credit ratings were to decline, the Company'sCompany’s equity income could be reduced as a result of the potential increase in interest expense for those bottlers.
We monitor our financial ratios and, as indicated above, the rating agencies consider these ratios in assessing our credit ratings. Each rating agency employs a different aggregation methodology and has different thresholds for the various financial ratios. These thresholds are not necessarily permanent, nor are they always fully disclosed to our Company.
Our global presence and strong capital position give us access to key financial markets around the world, enabling us to raiseborrow funds at a low effective cost. This posture, coupled with active management of our mix of short-term and long-term debt andas well as our mix of fixed-rate and variable-rate debt, results in a lower overall cost of borrowing. Our debt management policies, in conjunction with our share repurchase program and investment activity, can result in current liabilities exceeding current assets.
53





Issuances and payments of debt included both short-term and long-term financing activities. In 2018,During 2021, the Company had issuances of debt of $27,339$13,094 million, which primarily included $24,253$3,391 million of issuances related to commercial paper and short-term debt with maturities greater than 90 days and $3,083$80 million of net issuances related to commercial paper and short-term debt with maturities of 90 days or less.
During 2018, the Company made payments of debt of $30,568 million, which included $27,249 million of payments related to commercial paper and short-term debt with maturities greater than 90 days. The Company'sCompany’s total payments of long-term debt were $3,319 million.
In 2017, the Company had issuances of debt of $29,857 million, which included issuances of $26,218 million of commercial paper and short-term debt with maturities greater than 90 days and long-term debt issuances of $3,639were $9,623 million, net of related discounts and issuance costs.
During 2017,2021, the Company made payments of debt of $28,768$12,866 million, which included $636 millionconsisted of payments related to commercial paper and short-term debt with maturities of 90 days or less and $24,156 of payments related to commercial paper and short-term debt with maturities greater than 90 days. The Company's total payments of long-term debt were $3,976 million. The long-term debt payments included the early extinguishment of long-term debt with a carrying value of $417 million, a portion of which was assumed in connection with our acquisition of Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc.'s former North America business ("Old CCE"). This resulted in a net charge of $38 million that was recorded in the line item interest expense in our consolidated statement of income. This net charge reflects the difference between the reacquisition price and the net carrying amount of the debt extinguished.
In 2016, the Company had issuances of debt of $27,281 million, which included net issuances of $773 million of commercial paper and short-term debt with maturities of 90 days or less and $21,525 million of commercial paper and short-term debt with maturities greater than 90 days. The Company's total issuances of debt also included long-term debt issuances of $4,983 million, net of related discounts and issuance costs.
During 2016, the Company made payments of debt of $25,615 million, which included $22,920$2,357 million of payments related to commercial paper and short-term debt with maturities greater than 90 days and payments of long-term debt of $2,695$10,509 million.
The carrying valueDuring 2020, the Company had issuances of the Company'sdebt of $26,934 million, which included $8,260 million of issuances related to commercial paper and short-term debt with maturities greater than 90 days and long-term debt issuances of $18,674 million, net of related discounts and issuance costs.
During 2020, the Company made payments of debt of $28,796 million, which included fair value adjustments$15,292 million of payments related to thecommercial paper and short-term debt assumed from Old CCEwith maturities greater than 90 days and $1,768 million net issuances related to commercial paper and short-term debt with maturities of $212 million and $263 million as90 days or less. The Company’s total payments of long-term debt were $11,736 million.
On December 31, 20182021, the United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority, the governing body responsible for regulating LIBOR, ceased to publish certain LIBOR reference rates. However, other LIBOR reference rates, including U.S. dollar overnight, 1-month, 3-month, 6-month and 2017, respectively. These fair value adjustments are being amortized over12-month maturities will continue to be published through June 2023. In preparation for the numberdiscontinuation of years remaining untilLIBOR, we have amended, or will amend, our LIBOR-referencing agreements to either reference the underlying debt matures. As ofSecured Overnight Financing Rate or include mechanics for selecting an alternative rate. We do not plan to enter into variable-rate agreements that reference LIBOR after December 31, 2018, the weighted-average maturity of the assumed debt to which these fair value adjustments relate was approximately 19 years. The


amortization of these fair value adjustments will be a reduction of interest expense in future periods, which will typically result in our interest expense being less than the actual interest paid to service the debt. Total interest paid was $871 million, $757 million and $663 million in 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Refer to Note 11 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information related to the Company's long-term debt balances.2021.
Issuances of Stock
The issuances of stock in 2018, 20172021 and 20162020 were related to the exercise of stock options by Company employees.
Share Repurchases
In 2012, the Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase programplan of up to 500 million shares of the Company'sCompany’s common stock. The table below presents annualIn 2019, our Board of Directors authorized a new plan for the Company to purchase up to an additional 150 million shares repurchasedof our common stock.
During 2021 and average price per share:
Year Ended December 31,2018
 2017
 2016
Number of shares repurchased (in millions)39
 82
 86
Average price per share$45.09
 $44.09
 $43.62
2020, the Company did not repurchase common stock under the share repurchase plan authorized by our Board of Directors. Since the inception of our initial share repurchase program in 1984, through our current program as of December 31, 2018, we have purchased 3.5 billion shares of our Company's common stock at an average price per share of $17.06.$17.25. In addition to shares repurchased under the share repurchase program authorized by our Board of Directors, the Company'sCompany’s treasury stock activity also includes shares surrendered to the Company to pay the exercise price and/or to satisfy tax withholding obligations in connection with so-called stock swap exercises of employee stock options and/or the vesting of restricted stock issued to employees. In 2018, we repurchased $1.9 billion of our stock. The net impact of the Company'sCompany’s treasury stock issuance and purchase activities in 2018activity during 2021 resulted in a net cash outflow of $0.4 billion. In 2019, we expect to repurchase shares to offset dilution resulting from employee stock-based compensation plans.$111 million.
Dividends
The Company paid dividends of $6,644 million, $6,320$7,252 million and $6,043$7,047 million during the years ended December 31, 2018, 20172021 and 2016,2020, respectively.
At its February 20192022 meeting, our Board of Directors increased our regular quarterly dividend by 2.6 percent, raising it to $0.40$0.44 per share, equivalent to a full year dividend of $1.60$1.76 per share in 2019.2022. This is our 5760th consecutive annual increase. Our annualized common stock dividend was $1.56 per share, $1.48$1.68 per share and $1.40$1.64 per share in 2018, 20172021 and 2016,2020, respectively. The 2018 dividend represented a 5 percent increase from 2017, and the 2017 dividend represented a 6 percent increase from 2016.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Aggregate
54





Contractual Obligations
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
In accordance with the definition under SEC rules, the following qualify as off-balance sheet arrangements:
any obligation under certain guarantee contracts;
a retained or contingent interest in assets transferred to an unconsolidated entity or similar arrangement that serves as credit, liquidity or market risk support to that entity for such assets;
any obligation under certain derivative instruments; and
any obligation arising out of a material variable interest held by the registrant in an unconsolidated entity that provides financing, liquidity, market risk or credit risk support to the registrant, or engages in leasing, hedging or research and development services with the registrant.
As of December 31, 2018, we were contingently liable for guarantees of indebtedness owed by third parties of $600 million, of which $247 million was related to VIEs. These guarantees are primarily related to third-party customers, bottlers, vendors and container manufacturing operations and have arisen through2021, the normal course of business. These guarantees have various terms, and none of these guarantees is individually significant. These amounts represent the maximum potential future payments that we could be required to make under the guarantees; however, we do not consider it probable that we will be required to satisfy these guarantees. Management has concluded that the likelihood of any significant amounts being paid by our Company under these guarantees is not probable. As of December 31, 2018, we were not directly liable for the debt of any unconsolidated entity, and we did not have any retained or contingent interest in assets as defined above.


Our Company recognizes all derivatives as either assets or liabilities at fair value in our consolidated balance sheets. Refer to Note 6 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Aggregate Contractual Obligations
As of December 31, 2018, the Company'sCompany’s contractual obligations, including payments due by period, were as follows (in millions):
Payments Due by Period
Total20222023-20242025-20262027 and
Thereafter
Short-term loans and notes payable:1
    
Commercial paper borrowings$2,462 $2,462 $— $— $— 
Lines of credit and other short-term borrowings845 845 — — — 
Current maturities of long-term debt2
1,333 1,333 — — — 
Long-term debt, net of current maturities2
37,846 — 2,192 1,732 33,922 
Estimated interest payments3
10,648 620 1,125 1,059 7,844 
Accrued income taxes4
3,594 686 1,709 1,199 — 
Purchase obligations5
21,118 12,569 2,316 1,617 4,616 
Marketing obligations6
3,589 2,331 623 326 309 
Lease obligations1,688 330 526 351 481 
Acquisition obligations7
1,716 795 564 357 — 
Held-for-sale obligations8
264 238 15 
Total contractual obligations$85,103 $22,209 $9,070 $6,644 $47,180 
 
Payments Due by Period  
 Total
 2019
 2020-2021
 2022-2023
 
2024 and
Thereafter

Short-term loans and notes payable:1
 
    
  
  
Commercial paper borrowings$13,063
 $13,063
 $
 $
 $
Lines of credit and other short-term
   borrowings
131
 131
 
 
 
Current maturities of long-term debt2
4,999
 4,999
 
 
 
Long-term debt, net of current maturities2
25,230
 
 7,203
 6,463
 11,564
Estimated interest payments3
3,907
 461
 757
 584
 2,105
Accrued income taxes4
4,364
 378
 652
 1,128
 2,206
Purchase obligations5
14,840
 8,344
 1,512
 1,066
 3,918
Marketing obligations6
4,260
 2,333
 1,035
 458
 434
Lease obligations695
 181
 210
 143
 161
Held-for-sale obligations7
1,722
 1,722
 
 
 
Total contractual obligations$73,211
 $31,612
 $11,369
 $9,842
 $20,388
1Refer to Note 10 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding short-term loans and notes payable. Upon payment of outstanding commercial paper, we typically issue new commercial paper. Lines of credit and other short-term borrowings are expected to fluctuate depending upon current liquidity needs, especially at international subsidiaries.
1
2Refer to Note 10 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding long-term debt. We will consider several alternatives for settling this long-term debt, including the use of cash flows from operating activities, issuance of commercial paper or issuance of other long-term debt. The table above shows expected cash payments to be made by the Company and excludes the noncash portion of debt, including any fair market value adjustments, unamortized discounts and premiums.
3We calculated estimated interest payments for our long-term debt based on the applicable rates and payment dates. For our variable-rate debt, we have assumed the December 31, 2021 rate for all periods presented. We expect to fund such interest payments with cash flows from operating activities and/or short-term borrowings.
4Refer to Note 14 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding income taxes. Accrued income taxes include $3,294 million related to the one-time transition tax required by the Tax Reform Act. Liabilities of $1,347 million for unrecognized tax benefits plus accrued interest and penalties were not included in the total above. Currently, the settlement period for the unrecognized tax benefits cannot be determined. In addition, any payments related to unrecognized tax benefits may be partially or fully offset by reductions in payments in other jurisdictions.
5Purchase obligations include agreements to purchase goods or services that are enforceable and legally binding and that specify all significant terms. These agreements include long-term contractual obligations, open purchase orders, accounts payable and certain accrued liabilities. We expect to fund these purchase obligations with cash flows from operating activities.
6We expect to fund these marketing obligations with cash flows from operating activities.
7Represents obligations related to our acquisitions of fairlife and BodyArmor. Refer to Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
8Represents liabilities and contractual obligations of the Company’s bottling operations that are classified as held for sale.
Refer to Note 11 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding short-term loans and notes payable. Upon payment of outstanding commercial paper, we typically issue new commercial paper. Lines of credit and other short-term borrowings are expected to fluctuate depending upon current liquidity needs, especially at international subsidiaries.
2
Refer to Note 11 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding long-term debt. We will consider several alternatives to settle this long-term debt, including the use of cash flows from operating activities, issuance of commercial paper or issuance of other long-term debt. The table above shows expected cash payments to be made by the Company in future periods and excludes the noncash portion of debt, including any fair market value adjustments, unamortized discounts and premiums.
3
We calculated estimated interest payments for our long-term debt based on the applicable rates and payment dates. For our variable-rate debt, we have assumed the December 31, 2018 rate for all years presented. We typically expect to settle such interest payments with cash flows from operating activities and/or short-term borrowings.
4
Refer to Note 15 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding income taxes. Accrued income taxes include $3,986 million related to the one-time transition tax required by the Tax Reform Act. Liabilities of $522 million for unrecognized tax benefits plus accrued interest and penalties were not included in the total above. At this time, the settlement period for these liabilities cannot be determined. In addition, any payments related to unrecognized tax benefits may be partially or fully offset by reductions in payments in other jurisdictions.
5
Purchase obligations include agreements to purchase goods or services that are enforceable and legally binding and that specify all significant terms, including long-term contractual obligations, open purchase orders, accounts payable and certain accrued liabilities. We expect to fund these obligations with cash flows from operating activities.
6
We expect to fund these marketing obligations with cash flows from operating activities.
7
Represents liabilities and contractual obligations of the Company's bottling operations that are classified as held for sale.
The total accrued benefit liability for pension and other postretirement benefit plans recognized as of December 31, 20182021 was $1,817$1,497 million. Refer to Note 1413 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. This amount is impacted by, among other items, pension expense,net periodic benefit cost or income, plan funding levels, plan amendments, changes in plan demographics and assumptions, and the investment return on plan assets. Because the accrued liability does not represent expected liquidity needs, we did not include this amount in the contractual obligations table.table above.
We generally expect to fundmake all futurecontributions to our pension contributionstrusts with cash flows from operating activities. Our international pension plans are generally funded in accordance with local laws and income tax regulations. The Company expects to contribute $26 million in 2022 to our pension trusts, all of which will be allocated to our international plans. Refer to Note 13 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. We did not include our estimated contributions to our pension trusts in the table above.
As of December 31, 2018,2021, the projected benefit obligation of the U.S. qualified pension plans was $5,170$5,486 million, and the fair value of the related planplans’ assets was $4,842$5,383 million. The projected benefit obligation of all pension plans other than the U.S. qualified pension plans was $2,834$3,094 million, and the fair value of the related planplans’ assets was $2,567$3,522 million. The majority of thisCompany sponsors various

55




underfunding is attributable to an international

unfunded pension plan for certain non-U.S. employees that is unfunded due to tax law restrictions,plans outside the United States as well as certain unfunded U.S. nonqualified pension plans. These U.S. nonqualified pension plans provide, for certain associates,employees, benefits that are not permitted to be funded through a qualified plan because of limits imposed by the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. The expected benefit payments for these unfunded pension plans are not included in the table above. However, we anticipate annual benefit payments for these unfunded pension plans to be $66approximately $63 million in 2019, increasing to $70 million by 2025 and then decreasing annually thereafter.for 2022 through 2027. Thereafter, the expected annual benefit payments will decrease. Refer to Note 1413 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
The Company expects to contribute $32 million in 2019 to our global pension plans, all of which will be allocated to our international plans. Refer to Note 14 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. We did not include our estimated contributions to our various plans in the table above.
In general, we are self-insured for large portions of many different types of claims; however, we do use commercial insurance above our self-insured retentions to reduce the Company'sCompany’s risk of catastrophic loss. Our reserves for the Company'sCompany’s self-insured losses are estimated throughusing actuarial proceduresmethods and assumptions of the insurance industry, and by using industry assumptions, adjusted for our specific expectations based on our claimclaims history. As of December 31, 2018,2021, our self-insurance reserves totaled $362$229 million. Refer to Note 1211 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. We did not include estimated payments related to our self-insurance reserves in the table above.
Deferred income tax liabilities as of December 31, 20182021 were $1,933$2,821 million. Refer to Note 1514 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. This amount is not included in the total contractual obligations table above because we believe that presentation would not be meaningful. Deferred income tax liabilities are calculated based on temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their respective book bases, which will result in taxable amounts in future years when the underlying assets or liabilities are settled at their reported financial statement amounts. The results of these calculations do not have a direct connection with the amount of cash taxes to be paid in any future periods.years. As a result, scheduling deferred income tax liabilities as payments due by period could be misleading, because this scheduling would not relate to liquidity needs.
Additionally, on January 3, 2019,As of December 31, 2021, we were contingently liable for guarantees of indebtedness owed by third parties of $440 million, of which $93 million was related to VIEs. These guarantees are primarily related to third-party customers, bottlers and vendors and have arisen through the normal course of business. These guarantees have various terms, and none of these guarantees is individually significant. These amounts represent the maximum potential future payments that we could be required to make under the guarantees. However, management has concluded that the likelihood of any significant amounts being paid by our Company completed the acquisition of Costa for $4.9 billion, whichunder these guarantees is not includedprobable. As of December 31, 2021, we were not directly liable for the debt of any unconsolidated entity, and we did not have any retained or contingent interest in the tableassets as defined above. Refer to Note 22 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Foreign Exchange
Our international operations are subject to certain opportunities and risks, including currency fluctuations and governmental actions. We closely monitor our operations in each country and seek to adopt appropriate strategies that are responsive to changing economic and political environments as well as to fluctuations in foreign currencies.
In 2018,2021, we used 7270 functional currencies in addition to the U.S. dollar. Due to the geographic diversity of our operations, weaknessesweakness in some of these currencies may be offset by strengthsstrength in others.
In 20182021 and 2017,2020, the weighted-average exchange rates for foreign currencies in which the Company conducted operations (all operating currencies), and for certain individual currencies, strengthened (weakened) against the U.S. dollar as follows:
Year Ended December 31,20212020
All operating currencies2 %(4)%
Australian dollar10 %(2)%
Brazilian real(4)(23)
British pound sterling3 
Euro5 
Japanese yen(2)
Mexican peso6 (10)
South African rand6 (18)
Year Ended December 31,2018
 2017
All operating currencies(1)% %
Brazilian real(12)% 11%
Mexican peso(2) (2)
Australian dollar(2) 3
South African rand3
 10
British pound sterling4
 (6)
Euro5
 1
Japanese yen2
 (3)
TheseThe percentages in the table above do not include the effects of our hedging activities and, therefore, do not reflect the actual impact of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates on our operating results. Our foreign currency management program is designed to mitigate, over time, a portion of the potentially unfavorable impact of exchange rate changes on our net income and earnings per share.
The total currency impact on net operating revenues, including the effect of our hedging activities, was a decreasean increase of 1 percent in 20182021 and 2017.a decrease of 2 percent in 2020. The total currency impact on income from continuing operations before income taxes, including the effect of our hedging activities, was an increase of 2 percent in 2021 and a decrease of 76 percent in 2018 and was nominal in 2017.2020.

56






Foreign currency exchange gains and losses are primarily the result of the remeasurement of monetary assets and liabilities from certain currencies into functional currencies. The effects of the remeasurement of these assets and liabilities are partially offset by the impact of our economic hedging program for certain exposures on our consolidated balance sheets.sheet. Refer to Note 65 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Foreign currency exchange gains and losses are included as a component ofrecorded in the line item other income (loss) — net in our consolidated statementsstatement of income. Refer to the heading "Operations“Operations Review — Other Income (Loss) — Net"Net” above. The Company recorded net foreign currency exchange losses of $144 million, $57$61 million and $246$64 million during the years ended December 31, 2018, 20172021 and 2016,2020, respectively.
Hyperinflationary Economies
A hyperinflationary economy is one that has cumulative inflation of 100 percent or more over a three-year period. In accordance with U.S. GAAP, local subsidiaries in hyperinflationary economies are required to use the U.S. dollar as their functional currency and remeasure the monetary assets and liabilities not denominated in U.S. dollars using the rate applicable to conversion of a currency for purposes of dividend remittances. All exchange gains and losses resulting from remeasurement are recognized currently in income.
Venezuela has been designated as a hyperinflationary economy. During the year ended December 31, 2016 the Venezuelan government devalued its currency and changed its official and most preferential exchange rate, which should be used for purchases of certain essential goods, to 10 bolivars per U.S. dollar from 6.3. The official and most preferential rate is now known as DIPRO and the former official rate has been eliminated. The Venezuelan government replaced the former open market exchange rate with the DICOM rate, which is allowed to float freely and is expected to fluctuate based on supply and demand. As a result, management determined that the DICOM rate was the most appropriate legally available rate to remeasure the net monetary assets of our Venezuelan subsidiary.
We sell concentrate to our bottling partner in Venezuela from outside the country. These sales are denominated in U.S. dollars. During the year ended December 31, 2016, as a result of the continued lack of liquidity and our revised assessment of the U.S. dollar value we expected to realize upon the conversion of Venezuelan bolivars into U.S. dollars by our bottling partner to pay our concentrate sales receivables, we recorded a write-down of $76 million, which was recorded in the line item other operating charges in our consolidated statement of income.
We also have certain U.S. dollar-denominated intangible assets associated with products sold in Venezuela. As a result of weaker sales, the volatility of foreign currency exchange rates resulting from continued instability and the Company's revised expectations regarding the convertibility of the local currency, we recognized an impairment charge of $34 million during the year ended December 31, 2017, which was recorded in the line item other operating charges in our consolidated statement of income. As a result of the impairment charge, the remaining carrying value of all U.S. dollar-denominated intangible assets associated with products sold in Venezuela is zero.
Impact of Inflation and Changing Prices
Inflation affects the way we operate in many markets around the world. In general, we believe that, over time, we will be able to increase prices to counteract the majority of the inflationary effects of increasing costs and to generate sufficient cash flows to maintain our productive capability.


Overview of Financial Position
The following table illustrates the change in the individual line items of the Company's consolidated balance sheet (in millions):
December 31,2018
 2017
 Increase (Decrease)
 Percent Change
Cash and cash equivalents$8,926
 $6,006
 $2,920
 49 %
Short-term investments2,025
 9,352
 (7,327) (78)
Marketable securities5,013
 5,317
 (304) (6)
Trade accounts receivable — net3,396
 3,667
 (271) (7)
Inventories2,766
 2,655
 111
 4
Prepaid expenses and other assets1,962
 2,000
 (38) (2)
Assets held for sale
 219
 (219) (100)
Assets held for sale — discontinued operations6,546
 7,329
 (783) (11)
Equity method investments19,407
 20,856
 (1,449) (7)
Other investments867
 1,096
 (229) (21)
Other assets4,139
 4,230
 (91) (2)
Deferred income tax assets2,667
 330
 2,337
 708
Property, plant and equipment — net8,232
 8,203
 29
 
Trademarks with indefinite lives6,682
 6,729
 (47) (1)
Bottlers' franchise rights with indefinite lives51
 138
 (87) (63)
Goodwill10,263
 9,401
 862
 9
Other intangible assets274
 368
 (94) (26)
Total assets$83,216
 $87,896
 $(4,680) (5)%
Accounts payable and accrued expenses$8,932
 $8,748
 $184
 2 %
Loans and notes payable13,194
 13,205
 (11) 
Current maturities of long-term debt4,997
 3,298
 1,699
 52
Accrued income taxes378
 410
 (32) (8)
Liabilities held for sale
 37
 (37) (100)
Liabilities held for sale — discontinued operations1,722
 1,496
 226
 15
Long-term debt25,364
 31,182
 (5,818) (19)
Other liabilities7,638
 8,021
 (383) (5)
Deferred income tax liabilities1,933
 2,522
 (589) (23)
Total liabilities$64,158
 $68,919
 $(4,761) (7)%
Net assets$19,058
 $18,977
 $81
1 
 %
1
Includes a decrease in net assets of $2,035 million resulting from foreign currency translation adjustments in various balance sheet line items.
The increases (decreases) in the table above include the impact of the following transactions and events:
Assets held for sale — discontinued operations decreased primarily due to a $554 million impairment charge and a $411 million allocation of goodwill to other reporting units. Refer to Note 2 and Note 17 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Equity method investments decreased primarily due to the derecognition of our equity method interest in the Philippine bottling operations as well as other-than-temporary impairment charges of $591 million related to certain of our equity method investees. Refer to Note 2 and Note 17 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Deferred income tax assets increased primarily as a result of our adoption of ASU 2016-16, Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory, which required us to record a deferred tax asset of $2.9 billion during the year ended December 31, 2018. Refer to Note 1 and Note 15 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Goodwill increased primarily due to the acquisition of the Philippine bottling operations and the allocation of goodwill from CCBA to other reporting units. Refer to Note 2 and Note 9 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Current maturities of long-term debt increased and long-term debt decreased primarily due to a portion of the Company's long-term debt maturing within the next 12 months and being reclassified as current. Current maturities of long-term
debt were reduced by payments. Refer to the heading "Cash Flows from Financing Activities" above for additional information.


ITEM 7A.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Our Company uses derivative financial instruments primarily to reduce our exposure to adverse fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, interest rates, commodity prices and other market risks. We do not enter into derivative financial instruments for trading purposes. As a matter of policy, all of our derivative positions are used to reduce risk by hedging an underlying economic exposure. Because of the high correlation between the hedging instrumentinstruments and the underlying exposure,exposures, fluctuations in the valuevalues of the instruments are generally offset by reciprocal changes in the valuevalues of the underlying exposure. The Company generally hedges anticipated exposures up to 36 months in advance; however, the majority of our derivative instruments expire within 24 months or less. Virtually all of our derivatives are straightforward over-the-counter instruments with liquid markets.exposures.
We monitor our exposure to financial market risks using several objective measurement systems, including a sensitivity analysis to measure our exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, interest rates and commodity prices. Refer to Note 65 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information about our hedging transactions and derivative financial instruments.
Foreign Currency Exchange Rates
We manage most of our foreign currency exposures on a consolidated basis, which allows us to net certain exposures and take advantage of any natural offsets. In 2018,2021, we used 7270 functional currencies in addition to the U.S. dollar and generated $20,512 million$25.6 billion of our net operating revenues from operations outside the United States; therefore, weaknessesweakness in some currencies may be offset by strengthsstrength in other currencies over time. We use derivative financial instruments to further reduce our net exposure to foreign currency fluctuations.
Our Company enters into forward exchange contracts and purchases foreign currency options and collars (principally euros,euro, British poundspound sterling and Japanese yen) and collars to hedge certain portions of forecasted cash flows denominated in foreign currencies. Additionally, we enter into forward exchange contracts to offset the earnings impact related to foreign currency fluctuations on certain monetary assets and liabilities. We also enter into forward exchange contracts as hedges of net investments in foreign operations.
The total notional values of our foreign currency derivatives were $17,142$13,691 million and $13,057$16,663 million as of December 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, respectively. These values includeincluded derivative instruments that are designated and qualify for hedge accounting as well as economic hedges. The fair value of the contractsforeign currency derivatives that qualify for hedge accounting resulted in a net unrealized gain of $83$174 million as of December 31, 2018,2021, and we estimate that a 10 percent weakening of the U.S. dollar would have eliminateddecreased the net unrealized gain and created a net unrealized loss of $191to $172 million. The fair value of the contractsforeign currency derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting resulted in a net unrealized lossgain of $40$10 million as of December 31, 2018,2021, and we estimate that a 10 percent weakening of the U.S. dollar would have eliminated the net unrealized loss and createdresulted in a net unrealized gain of $217 million.$58 million increase in fair value.
Interest Rates
The Company is subject to interest rate volatility with regard to existing and future issuances of debt. We monitor our mix of fixed-rate and variable-rate debt as well as our mix of short-term debt and long-term debt. From time to time, we enter into interest rate swap agreements to manage our exposure to interest rate fluctuations.
Based on the Company'sCompany’s variable-rate debt and derivative instruments outstanding as of December 31, 2018,2021, we estimate that a 1 percentage point increase in interest rates would have increased interest expense by $251$125 million in 2018.2021. However, this increase in interest expense would have been partially offset by the increase in interest income relateddue to higher interest rates.
The Company is subject to interest rate risk related to its investments in highly liquid debt securities. These investments are primarily managed by external managers within the guidelines of the Company'sCompany’s investment policy. Our policy requires these investments to be investment grade, with the primary objective of minimizing the potential risk of principal loss. In addition, our policy
57





limits the amount of credit exposure to any one issuer. We estimate that a 1 percentage point increase in interest rates would resulthave resulted in a $100$52 million decrease in the fair value of our portfolio of highly liquid debt securities.
Commodity Prices
The Company is subject to market risk with respect to commodity price fluctuations, principally related to our purchases of sweeteners, metals, juices, PET and fuels. We manage our exposure to commodity risks primarily through the use of supplier pricing agreements, thatwhich enable us to establish the purchase prices for certain inputs that are used in our manufacturing and distribution operations. When deemed appropriate, we use derivative financial instruments to further manage our exposure to commodity risks. Certain of these derivatives do not qualify for hedge accounting, but they are effective economic hedges that help the Company mitigate the price risk associated with the purchases and transportation of materials used in our manufacturing processes.


OpenThe total notional values of our commodity derivatives were $918 million and $726 million as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. These values included derivative instruments that are designated and qualify for hedge accounting as well as economic hedges. There were no significant commodity derivatives that qualify for hedge accounting had notional values of $9 million and $35 million as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.2021. The fair value of the contractscommodity derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting resulted in a net unrealized lossgain of $1$127 million as of December 31, 2018,2021, and we estimate that a 10 percent decrease in underlying commodity prices would have increased the net unrealized loss to $2 million.
Open commodity derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting had notional values of $373 million and $357 million as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The fair value of the contracts that do not qualify for hedge accounting resulted in a net unrealized loss of $44$71 million as of December 31, 2018, and we estimate that a 10 percent decrease in underlying commodity prices would have increased the net unrealized loss to $69 million.fair value.




58





ITEM 8.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table of Contents
Page

59







THE COCA-COLA COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In millions except per share data)
Year Ended December 31,2018
 2017
 2016
(In millions except per share data)   
NET OPERATING REVENUES$31,856
 $35,410
 $41,863
Cost of goods sold11,770
 13,255
 16,465
GROSS PROFIT20,086
 22,155
 25,398
Selling, general and administrative expenses10,307
 12,654
 15,370
Other operating charges1,079
 1,902
 1,371
OPERATING INCOME8,700
 7,599
 8,657
Interest income682
 677
 642
Interest expense919
 841
 733
Equity income (loss) — net1,008
 1,071
 835
Other income (loss) — net(1,121) (1,764) (1,265)
INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE
   INCOME TAXES
8,350
 6,742
 8,136
Income taxes from continuing operations1,623
 5,560
 1,586
NET INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS6,727
 1,182
 6,550
Income (loss) from discontinued operations (net of income taxes of $126,
   $47 and $0, respectively)
(251) 101
 
CONSOLIDATED NET INCOME6,476
 1,283
 6,550
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests42
 35
 23
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO SHAREOWNERS OF
   THE COCA-COLA COMPANY
$6,434
 $1,248
 $6,527
      
Basic net income per share from continuing operations1
$1.58
 $0.28
 $1.51
Basic net income (loss) per share from discontinued operations2
(0.07) 0.02
 
BASIC NET INCOME PER SHARE$1.51
 $0.29
3 
$1.51
Diluted net income per share from continuing operations1
$1.57
 $0.27
 $1.49
Diluted net income (loss) per share from discontinued operations2
(0.07) 0.02
 
DILUTED NET INCOME PER SHARE$1.50
 $0.29
 $1.49
AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING — BASIC4,259
 4,272
 4,317
Effect of dilutive securities40
 52
 50
AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING — DILUTED4,299
 4,324
 4,367

Year Ended December 31,202120202019
Net Operating Revenues$38,655 $33,014 $37,266 
Cost of goods sold15,357 13,433 14,619 
Gross Profit23,298 19,581 22,647 
Selling, general and administrative expenses12,144 9,731 12,103 
Other operating charges846 853 458 
Operating Income10,308 8,997 10,086 
Interest income276 370 563 
Interest expense1,597 1,437 946 
Equity income (loss) — net1,438 978 1,049 
Other income (loss) — net2,000 841 34 
Income Before Income Taxes12,425 9,749 10,786 
Income taxes2,621 1,981 1,801 
Consolidated Net Income9,804 7,768 8,985 
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests33 21 65 
Net Income Attributable to Shareowners of The Coca-Cola Company$9,771 $7,747 $8,920 
Basic Net Income Per Share1
$2.26 $1.80 $2.09 
Diluted Net Income Per Share1
$2.25 $1.79 $2.07 
Average Shares Outstanding — Basic4,315 4,295 4,276 
Effect of dilutive securities25 28 38 
Average Shares Outstanding — Diluted4,340 4,323 4,314 
1 Calculated based on net income attributable to shareowners of The Coca-Cola Company.
1
Calculated based on net income from continuing operations less net income from continuing operations attributable to noncontrolling interests.
2
Calculated based on net income (loss) from discontinued operations less net income from discontinued operations attributable to noncontrolling interests.
3
Per share amounts do not add due to rounding.
Refer to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.






60





THE COCA-COLA COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(In millions)
Year Ended December 31,2018
 2017
 2016
(In millions)   
CONSOLIDATED NET INCOME$6,476
 $1,283
 $6,550
Other comprehensive income:     
Net foreign currency translation adjustments(2,035) 861
 (626)
Net gains (losses) on derivatives(7) (433) (382)
Net unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities(34) 188
 17
Net change in pension and other benefit liabilities29
 322
 (53)
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME4,429
 2,221
 5,506
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests95
 73
 10
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO
   SHAREOWNERS OF THE COCA-COLA COMPANY
$4,334
 $2,148
 $5,496

Year Ended December 31,202120202019
Consolidated Net Income$9,804 $7,768 $8,985 
Other Comprehensive Income:
Net foreign currency translation adjustments(699)(911)74 
Net gains (losses) on derivatives214 15 (54)
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale debt securities(90)(47)18 
Net change in pension and other postretirement benefit liabilities712 (267)(159)
Total Comprehensive Income9,941 6,558 8,864 
Less: Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests(101)(132)110 
Total Comprehensive Income Attributable to Shareowners of
  The Coca-Cola Company
$10,042 $6,690 $8,754 
Refer to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

61






THE COCA-COLA COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In millions except par value)
December 31,2018
 2017
(In millions except par value)   
ASSETS   
CURRENT ASSETS   
Cash and cash equivalents$8,926
 $6,006
Short-term investments2,025
 9,352
TOTAL CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS10,951
 15,358
Marketable securities5,013
 5,317
Trade accounts receivable, less allowances of $489 and $477, respectively3,396
 3,667
Inventories2,766
 2,655
Prepaid expenses and other assets1,962
 2,000
Assets held for sale
 219
Assets held for sale — discontinued operations6,546
 7,329
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS30,634
 36,545
EQUITY METHOD INVESTMENTS19,407
 20,856
OTHER INVESTMENTS867
 1,096
OTHER ASSETS4,139
 4,230
DEFERRED INCOME TAX ASSETS2,667
 330
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT — net8,232
 8,203
TRADEMARKS WITH INDEFINITE LIVES6,682
 6,729
BOTTLERS' FRANCHISE RIGHTS WITH INDEFINITE LIVES51
 138
GOODWILL10,263
 9,401
OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS274
 368
TOTAL ASSETS$83,216
 $87,896
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY   
CURRENT LIABILITIES   
Accounts payable and accrued expenses$8,932
 $8,748
Loans and notes payable13,194
 13,205
Current maturities of long-term debt4,997
 3,298
Accrued income taxes378
 410
Liabilities held for sale
 37
     Liabilities held for sale — discontinued operations1,722
 1,496
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES29,223
 27,194
LONG-TERM DEBT25,364
 31,182
OTHER LIABILITIES7,638
 8,021
DEFERRED INCOME TAX LIABILITIES1,933
 2,522
THE COCA-COLA COMPANY SHAREOWNERS' EQUITY   
          Common stock, $0.25 par value; Authorized — 11,200 shares;
               Issued — 7,040 and 7,040 shares, respectively
1,760
 1,760
Capital surplus16,520
 15,864
Reinvested earnings63,234
 60,430
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)(12,814) (10,305)
Treasury stock, at cost — 2,772 and 2,781 shares, respectively(51,719) (50,677)
EQUITY ATTRIBUTABLE TO SHAREOWNERS OF THE COCA-COLA COMPANY16,981
 17,072
EQUITY ATTRIBUTABLE TO NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS2,077
 1,905
TOTAL EQUITY19,058
 18,977
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY$83,216
 $87,896

December 31,20212020
ASSETS
Current Assets  
Cash and cash equivalents$9,684 $6,795 
Short-term investments1,242 1,771 
Total Cash, Cash Equivalents and Short-Term Investments10,926 8,566 
Marketable securities1,699 2,348 
Trade accounts receivable, less allowances of $516 and $526, respectively3,512 3,144 
Inventories3,414 3,266 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets2,994 1,916 
Total Current Assets22,545 19,240 
Equity method investments17,598 19,273 
Other investments818 812 
Other noncurrent assets6,731 6,184 
Deferred income tax assets2,129 2,460 
Property, plant and equipment — net9,920 10,777 
Trademarks with indefinite lives14,465 10,395 
Goodwill19,363 17,506 
Other intangible assets785 649 
Total Assets$94,354 $87,296 
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current Liabilities  
Accounts payable and accrued expenses$14,619 $11,145 
Loans and notes payable3,307 2,183 
Current maturities of long-term debt1,338 485 
Accrued income taxes686 788 
Total Current Liabilities19,950 14,601 
Long-term debt38,116 40,125 
Other noncurrent liabilities8,607 9,453 
Deferred income tax liabilities2,821 1,833 
The Coca-Cola Company Shareowners’ Equity  
Common stock, $0.25 par value; authorized — 11,200 shares; issued — 7,040 shares1,760 1,760 
Capital surplus18,116 17,601 
Reinvested earnings69,094 66,555 
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)(14,330)(14,601)
Treasury stock, at cost — 2,715 and 2,738 shares, respectively(51,641)(52,016)
Equity Attributable to Shareowners of The Coca-Cola Company22,999 19,299 
Equity attributable to noncontrolling interests1,861 1,985 
Total Equity24,860 21,284 
Total Liabilities and Equity$94,354 $87,296 
Refer to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

62






THE COCA-COLA COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In millions)
Year Ended December 31,2018
 2017
 2016
(In millions)   
OPERATING ACTIVITIES     
Consolidated net income$6,476
 $1,283
 $6,550
(Income) loss from discontinued operations251
 (101) 
Net income from continuing operations6,727
 1,182
 6,550
Depreciation and amortization1,086
 1,260
 1,787
Stock-based compensation expense225
 219
 258
Deferred income taxes(450) (1,256) (856)
Equity (income) loss — net of dividends(457) (628) (449)
Foreign currency adjustments(38) 281
 158
Significant (gains) losses on sales of assets — net189
 1,459
 1,146
Other operating charges558
 1,218
 647
Other items682
 (269) (224)
Net change in operating assets and liabilities(1,202) 3,464
 (225)
Net cash provided by operating activities7,320
 6,930
 8,792
INVESTING ACTIVITIES     
Purchases of investments(7,789) (17,296) (16,626)
Proceeds from disposals of investments14,977
 16,694
 17,842
Acquisitions of businesses, equity method investments and nonmarketable securities(1,040) (3,809) (838)
Proceeds from disposals of businesses, equity method investments and nonmarketable securities1,362
 3,821
 1,035
Purchases of property, plant and equipment(1,347) (1,675) (2,262)
Proceeds from disposals of property, plant and equipment245
 104
 150
Other investing activities(60) (93) (305)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities6,348
 (2,254) (1,004)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES     
Issuances of debt27,339
 29,857
 27,281
Payments of debt(30,568) (28,768) (25,615)
Issuances of stock1,476
 1,595
 1,434
Purchases of stock for treasury(1,912) (3,682) (3,681)
Dividends(6,644) (6,320) (6,043)
Other financing activities(243) (91) 79
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities(10,552) (7,409) (6,545)
CASH FLOWS FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities from discontinued operations307
 111
 
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities from discontinued operations(421) (58) 
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities from discontinued operations205
 (38) 
     Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations91
 15
 
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS,
   RESTRICTED CASH AND RESTRICTED CASH EQUIVALENTS
(262) 241
 (5)
CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS, RESTRICTED CASH AND RESTRICTED CASH
   EQUIVALENTS
     
Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents
   during the year
2,945
 (2,477) 1,238
Cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents at beginning of year6,373
 8,850
 7,612
   Cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents at end of year9,318
 6,373
 8,850
Less: Restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents at end of year392
 367
 295
   Cash and cash equivalents at end of year$8,926
 $6,006
 $8,555

Year Ended December 31,202120202019
Operating Activities  
Consolidated net income$9,804 $7,768 $8,985 
Depreciation and amortization1,452 1,536 1,365 
Stock-based compensation expense337 126 201 
Deferred income taxes894 (18)(280)
Equity (income) loss — net of dividends(615)(511)(421)
Foreign currency adjustments86 (88)91 
Significant (gains) losses — net(1,365)(914)(467)
Other operating charges506 556 127 
Other items201 699 504 
Net change in operating assets and liabilities1,325 690 366 
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities12,625 9,844 10,471 
Investing Activities  
Purchases of investments(6,030)(13,583)(4,704)
Proceeds from disposals of investments7,059 13,835 6,973 
Acquisitions of businesses, equity method investments and nonmarketable securities(4,766)(1,052)(5,542)
Proceeds from disposals of businesses, equity method investments and nonmarketable securities2,180 189 429 
Purchases of property, plant and equipment(1,367)(1,177)(2,054)
Proceeds from disposals of property, plant and equipment108 189 978 
Other investing activities51 122 (56)
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities(2,765)(1,477)(3,976)
Financing Activities  
Issuances of debt13,094 26,934 23,009 
Payments of debt(12,866)(28,796)(24,850)
Issuances of stock702 647 1,012 
Purchases of stock for treasury(111)(118)(1,103)
Dividends(7,252)(7,047)(6,845)
Other financing activities(353)310 (227)
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities(6,786)(8,070)(9,004)
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash, Cash Equivalents, Restricted Cash and
    Restricted Cash Equivalents
(159)76 (72)
Cash, Cash Equivalents, Restricted Cash and Restricted Cash Equivalents  
Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash
   equivalents during the year
2,915 373 (2,581)
Cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents at beginning of year7,110 6,737 9,318 
Cash, Cash Equivalents, Restricted Cash and Restricted Cash Equivalents at End of Year10,025 7,110 6,737 
Less: Restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents at end of year341 315 257 
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Year$9,684 $6,795 $6,480 
Refer to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

63






THE COCA-COLA COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREOWNERS'SHAREOWNERS’ EQUITY
(In millions except per share data)
Year Ended December 31,2018
 2017
 2016
(In millions except per share data)   
EQUITY ATTRIBUTABLE TO SHAREOWNERS OF THE COCA-COLA COMPANY     
    NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING 
  
  
Balance at beginning of year4,259
 4,288
 4,324
Treasury stock issued to employees related to stock compensation plans48
 53
 50
Purchases of stock for treasury(39) (82) (86)
Balance at end of year4,268
 4,259
 4,288
    COMMON STOCK$1,760
 $1,760
 $1,760
    CAPITAL SURPLUS 
  
  
Balance at beginning of year15,864
 14,993
 14,016
Stock issued to employees related to stock compensation plans467
 655
 589
Tax benefit (charge) from stock compensation plans
 
 130
Stock-based compensation expense225
 219
 258
Other activities(36) (3) 
Balance at end of year16,520
 15,864
 14,993
    REINVESTED EARNINGS 
  
  
Balance at beginning of year60,430
 65,502
 65,018
Adoption of accounting standards1
3,014
 
 
Net income attributable to shareowners of The Coca-Cola Company6,434
 1,248
 6,527
Dividends (per share — $1.56, $1.48 and $1.40 in 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively)(6,644) (6,320) (6,043)
Balance at end of year63,234
 60,430
 65,502
    ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) 
  
  
Balance at beginning of year(10,305) (11,205) (10,174)
Adoption of accounting standards1
(409) 
 
Net other comprehensive income (loss)(2,100) 900
 (1,031)
Balance at end of year(12,814) (10,305) (11,205)
    TREASURY STOCK 
  
  
Balance at beginning of year(50,677) (47,988) (45,066)
Treasury stock issued to employees related to stock compensation plans704
 909
 811
Purchases of stock for treasury(1,746) (3,598) (3,733)
Balance at end of year(51,719) (50,677) (47,988)
TOTAL EQUITY ATTRIBUTABLE TO SHAREOWNERS OF
   THE COCA-COLA COMPANY
$16,981
 $17,072
 $23,062
EQUITY ATTRIBUTABLE TO NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS     
Balance at beginning of year$1,905
 $158
 $210
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests42
 35
 23
Net foreign currency translation adjustments53
 38
 (13)
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interests(31) (15) (25)
Contributions by noncontrolling interests
 
 1
Business combinations101
 1,805
 
Deconsolidation of certain entities
 (157) (34)
Other activities7
 41
 (4)
TOTAL EQUITY ATTRIBUTABLE TO NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS$2,077
 $1,905
 $158

Year Ended December 31,202120202019
Equity Attributable to Shareowners of The Coca-Cola Company   
    Number of Common Shares Outstanding   
   Balance at beginning of year4,302 4,280 4,268 
Treasury stock issued to employees related to stock-based compensation plans23 22 33 
Purchases of stock for treasury — (21)
   Balance at end of year4,325 4,302 4,280 
    Common Stock$1,760 $1,760 $1,760 
    Capital Surplus   
   Balance at beginning of year17,601 17,154 16,520 
Stock issued to employees related to stock-based compensation plans216 307 433 
Stock-based compensation expense299 141 201 
Other activities (1)— 
   Balance at end of year18,116 17,601 17,154 
    Reinvested Earnings   
   Balance at beginning of year66,555 65,855 63,234 
Adoption of accounting standards1
19 — 546 
Net income attributable to shareowners of The Coca-Cola Company9,771 7,747 8,920 
Dividends (per share — $1.68, $1.64 and $1.60 in 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively)(7,251)(7,047)(6,845)
   Balance at end of year69,094 66,555 65,855 
    Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)   
   Balance at beginning of year(14,601)(13,544)(12,814)
Adoption of accounting standards1
 — (564)
Net other comprehensive income (loss)271 (1,057)(166)
   Balance at end of year(14,330)(14,601)(13,544)
    Treasury Stock   
   Balance at beginning of year(52,016)(52,244)(51,719)
Treasury stock issued to employees related to stock-based compensation plans375 228 501 
Purchases of stock for treasury — (1,026)
   Balance at end of year(51,641)(52,016)(52,244)
Total Equity Attributable to Shareowners of The Coca-Cola Company$22,999 $19,299 $18,981 
Equity Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests   
   Balance at beginning of year$1,985 $2,117 $2,077 
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests33 21 65 
Net foreign currency translation adjustments(132)(153)45 
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interests(43)(18)(48)
Acquisition of interests held by noncontrolling owners — (84)
Contributions by noncontrolling interests20 17 
Net change in pension and other postretirement benefit liabilities(2)— — 
Business combinations 59 
Total Equity Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests$1,861 $1,985 $2,117 
1 ReferThe 2021 amount represents the adoption of Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2019-12, Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes, effective January 1, 2021. For information regarding the 2019 amounts, refer to Note 1 Note 3, Note 4 and Note 15.5.
Refer to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

64






THE COCA-COLA COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1: BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
When used in these notes, the terms "The“The Coca-Cola Company," "Company," "we," "us"” “Company,” “we,” “us” and "our"“our” mean The Coca-Cola Company and all entities included in our consolidated financial statements.
Description of Business
The Coca-Cola Company is the world's largest nonalcoholica total beverage company. We own or license and market more than 500 nonalcoholicnumerous beverage brands, which we group into the following category clusters:categories: Trademark Coca-Cola; sparkling soft drinks; water, enhanced waterflavors; hydration, sports, coffee and sports drinks;tea; nutrition, juice, dairy and plant-based beverages; tea and coffee; and energy drinks.emerging beverages. We own and market four5 of the world'sworld’s top fivesix nonalcoholic sparkling soft drink brands: Coca-Cola, Sprite, Fanta, Diet Coke Fanta and Sprite.Coca-Cola Zero Sugar. Finished beverage products bearing our trademarks, sold in the United States since 1886, are now sold in more than 200 countries and territories.
We make our branded beverage products available to consumers throughout the world through our network of independent bottling partners, distributors, wholesalers and retailers as well as Company-owned or -controlledthe Company’s consolidated bottling and distribution operations — the world's largest beverage distribution system ("Coca-Cola system").operations. Beverages bearing trademarks owned by or licensed to us account for more than 1.92.1 billion of the approximately 6163 billion servings of all beverages consumed worldwide every day.
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States ("(“U.S. GAAP"GAAP”). The preparation of our consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities in our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Although these estimates are based on our knowledge of current events and actions we may undertake in the future, actual results may ultimately differ from these estimates and assumptions. Furthermore, when testing assets for impairment in future periods, if management uses different assumptions or if different conditions occur, impairment charges may result.
Certain prior year amounts in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes have been revised to conform to the current year presentation as a result of the adoption of certain accounting standards that became effective January 1, 2018, as applicable. Refer to the "Recently Adopted Accounting Guidance" section within this note below for further details.
Principles of Consolidation
Our Company consolidates all entities that we control by ownership of a majority voting interest. Additionally, there are situations in which consolidation is required even though the usual condition of consolidation (ownership of a majority voting interest) does not apply. Generally, this occurs when an entity holds an interest in another business enterprise that was achieved through arrangements that do not involve voting interests, which results in a disproportionate relationship between such entity'sentity’s voting interests in, and its exposure to the economic risks and potential rewards of, the other business enterprise. This disproportionate relationship results in what is known as a variable interest, and the entity in which we have the variable interest is referred to as a "VIE."“VIE.” An enterprise must consolidate a VIE if it is determined to be the primary beneficiary of the VIE. The primary beneficiary has both (1) the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the entity'sentity’s economic performance and (2) the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE.
Our Company holds interests in certain VIEs, primarily bottling and container manufacturing operations, for which we were not determined to be the primary beneficiary. Our variable interests in these VIEs primarily relate to equity investments, profit guarantees or subordinated financial support. Refer to Note 12.11. Although these financial arrangements resulted in our holding variable interests in these entities, they did not empower us to direct the activities of the VIEs that most significantly impact the VIEs'VIEs’ economic performance. Our Company'sCompany’s investments, plus any loans and guarantees, and other subordinated financial support related to these VIEs totaled $3,916$1,980 million and $4,523$2,567 million as of December 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, respectively, representing our maximum exposures to loss. The Company'sCompany’s investments, plus any loans and guarantees, related to these VIEs were not individually significant to the Company'sCompany’s consolidated financial statements.
In addition, our Company holds interests in certain VIEs, primarily bottling and container manufacturing operations, for which we were determined to be the primary beneficiary. As a result, we have consolidated these entities. Our Company's


Company’s investments, plus any loans and guarantees, related to these VIEs totaled $49$103 million and $1$74 million as of December 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, respectively, representing our maximum exposures to loss. The assets and liabilities of VIEs for which we are the primary beneficiary were not significant to the Company'sCompany’s consolidated financial statements.
Creditors of our VIEs do not have recourse against the general credit of the Company, regardless of whether they are accounted for as consolidated entities.
65





We use the equity method to account for investments in companies if our investment provides us with the ability to exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies of the investee. Our consolidated net income includes our Company'sCompany’s proportionate share of the net income or loss of these companies. Our judgment regarding the level of influence over each equity method investee includes considering key factors such as our ownership interest, representation on the board of directors, participation in policy-making decisions, other commercial arrangements and material intercompany transactions.
We eliminate from our financial results all significant intercompany transactions, including the intercompany transactions with consolidated VIEs and the intercompany portion of transactions with equity method investees.
Assets and Liabilities Held for SaleRevenue Recognition
Our Company classifies long-lived assets or disposal groups to be sold as held for sale in the period in which all of the following criteria are met: (1) management, having the authority to approve the action, commits to a plan to sell the asset or disposal group; (2) the asset or disposal group is available for immediate sale in its present condition subject only to terms that are usual and customary for sales of such assets or disposal groups; (3) an active program to locate a buyer and other actions required to complete the plan to sell the asset or disposal group have been initiated; (4) the sale of the asset or disposal group is probable, and transfer of the asset or disposal group is expected to qualify for recognition as a completed sale within one year, except if events or circumstances beyond our control extend the period of time required to sell the asset or disposal group beyond one year; (5) the asset or disposal group is being actively marketed for sale at a price that is reasonable in relation to its current fair value; and (6) actions required to complete the plan indicate that it is unlikely that significant changes to the plan will be made or that the plan will be withdrawn.
We initially measure a long-lived asset or disposal group that is classified as held for sale at the lower of its carrying value or fair value less any costs to sell. Any loss resulting from this measurement is recognized in the period in which the held-for-sale criteria are met. Conversely, gains are not recognized on the sale of a long-lived asset or disposal group until the date of sale. We assess the fair value of a long-lived asset or disposal group less any costs to sell each reporting period it remains classified as held for sale and report any subsequent changes as an adjustment to the carrying value of the asset or disposal group, as long as the new carrying value does not exceed the carrying value of the asset at the time it was initially classified as held for sale.
Upon determining that a long-lived asset or disposal group meets the criteria to be classified as held for sale, the Company ceases depreciation and reports long-lived assets and/or the assets and liabilities of the disposal group, if material, in the line items assets held for sale and liabilities held for sale, respectively, in our consolidated balance sheet. Refer to Note 2.
Discontinued Operations
A disposal group is classified as a discontinued operation when the following criteria are met: (1) the disposal group is a component of an entity; (2) the component of the entity meets the held-for-sale criteria in accordance with our policy described above; and (3) the component of the entity represents a strategic shift in the entity's operating and financial results. Alternatively, if a business meets the criteria for held for sale on the acquisition date, the business is accounted for as a discontinued operation. In October 2017, the Company and Anheuser-Busch InBev ("ABI") completed the transition of ABI's controlling interest in Coca-Cola Beverages Africa Proprietary Limited ("CCBA") to the Company for $3,150 million, resulting in its consolidation. As CCBA met the criteria for held for sale upon consolidation, we have presented the financial position and results of operations of CCBA as discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
Revenue Recognition
Effective January 1, 2018, we adopted Accounting Standards Codification 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers ("ASC 606"). Revenue is recognizedrecognizes revenue when performance obligations under the terms of the contracts with our customers are satisfied. PriorOur performance obligation generally consists of the promise to the adoption of ASC 606, we recognized revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement existed, delivery ofsell concentrates, syrups or finished products had occurred, the sales price was fixedto our bottling partners, wholesalers, distributors or determinable and collectibility was reasonably assured.retailers. Refer to Note 3. 
Advertising Costs
Our Company expenses production costs of print, radio, television and other advertisements as of the first date the advertisements take place. All other marketing expenditures are expensed in the annual period in which the expenditure is incurred. Advertising costs included in the line item selling, general and administrative expenses in our consolidated statements of income were $4 billion, $3 billion and $4 billion in 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016.2019, respectively. As of December 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, advertising and production costs of


$54 $57 million and $95$83 million, respectively, were primarily recorded in the line item prepaid expenses and other current assets in our consolidated balance sheets.
For interim reporting purposes, we allocate our estimated full year marketing expenditures that benefit multiple interim periods to each of our interim reporting periods. We use the proportion of each interim period's actual unit case volume to the estimated full year unit case volume as the basis for the allocation. This methodology results in our marketing expenditures being recognized at a standard rate per unit case. At the end of each interim reporting period, we review our estimated full year unit case volume and our estimated full year marketing expenditures in order to evaluate if a change in estimate is necessary. The impact of any changes in these full year estimates is recognized in the interim period in which the change in estimate occurs. Our full year marketing expenditures are not impacted by this interim accounting policy.
Shipping and Handling Costs
Shipping and handling costs related to the movement of goods from our manufacturing locations to our sales distribution centers are included in the line item cost of goods sold in our consolidated statementsstatement of income. Shipping and handling costs incurred to move goods from our manufacturing locations or sales distribution centers to our customers are also included in the line item cost of goods sold in our consolidated statementsstatement of income, except for costs incurred to distribute goods sold by our Company-ownedconsolidated bottlers to our customers, which are included in the line item selling, general and administrative expenses.expenses in our consolidated statement of income. Our customers generally do not pay us separately for shipping and handling costs. Effective January 1, 2018, we adopted ASC 606. Upon adoption, we made a policy election toWe recognize the cost of shipping and handling activities that are performed after a customer obtains control of the goods as costs to fulfill our promise to provide goods to the customer. As a result of this election, the Company does not evaluate whether shipping and handling activities are services promised to customers. If revenue is recognized for the related goods before the shipping and handling activities occur, the related costs of those shipping and handling activities are accrued. Refer to Note 3 for additional information regarding revenue recognition.
Sales, Use, Value-Added and Excise Taxes
The Company collects taxes imposed directly on its customers related to sales, use, value-added, excise and other similar taxes. The Company then remits such taxes on behalf of its customers to the applicable governmental authorities. Upon adoption of ASC 606, we made a policy election toWe exclude from net operating revenues the tax amounts imposed on revenue-producing transactions that were collected from our customers to be remitted to governmental authorities. Accordingly, such tax amounts are recorded in the line item trade accounts receivable in our consolidated balance sheet when collection of taxes from the customer has not yet occurred and are recorded in the line item accounts payable and accrued expenses in our consolidated balance sheet until they are remitted to the applicable governmental authorities. Taxes imposed directly on the Company, whether based on receipts from sales, inventory procurement costs or manufacturing activities, are recorded in the line item cost of goods sold in our consolidated statement of income. Refer to Note 3 for additional information regarding revenue recognition.
Net Income Per Share
Basic net income per share is computed by dividing net income attributable to shareowners of The Coca-Cola Company by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the reporting period. Diluted net income per share is computed similarly to basic net income per share, except that it includes the potential dilution that could occur if dilutive securities were exercised. Approximately 51 million, 47 million and 516 million stock option awardsoptions were excluded from the computationscomputation of diluted net income per share in 2018, 2017both 2021 and 2016, respectively,2020 because the awardsstock options would have been antidilutive forantidilutive. The number of stock options excluded from the years presented.










The following table presents information related tocomputation of diluted net income from continuing operations and net income from discontinued operations (in millions):
Year Ended December 31,2018

2017

2016
CONTINUING OPERATIONS     
Net income from continuing operations$6,727
 $1,182
 $6,550
Less: Net income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to noncontrolling
   interests
(7) 1
 23
Net income from continuing operations attributable to shareowners of
   The Coca-Cola Company
$6,734
 $1,181
 $6,527
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS     
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations$(251) $101
 $
Less: Net income from discontinued operations attributable to noncontrolling interests49
 34
 
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations attributable to shareowners of
   The Coca-Cola Company
$(300) $67
 $
CONSOLIDATED     
Consolidated net income$6,476
 $1,283
 $6,550
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests42
 35
 23
Net income attributable to shareowners of The Coca-Cola Company$6,434
 $1,248
 $6,527
per share in 2019 was insignificant.
Cash, Cash Equivalents, Restricted Cash and Restricted Cash Equivalents
We classify time deposits and other investments that are highly liquid and have maturities of three3 months or less at the date of purchase as cash equivalents or restricted cash equivalents, as applicable. Restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents generally consist of amounts held by our captive insurance companies, which are included in the line item other noncurrent
66





assets on our consolidated balance sheets, and amounts classified in assets held for sale and assets held for sale discontinued operations.sheet. We manage our exposure to counterparty credit risk through specific minimum credit standards, diversification of counterparties and procedures to monitor our concentrations of credit risk.
The following table provides a summary of cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents that constitute the total amounts shown in theour consolidated statements of cash flows (in millions):
December 31,202120202019
Cash and cash equivalents$9,684 $6,795 $6,480 
Restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents included in other noncurrent assets1,2
341 315 257 
Cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents$10,025 $7,110 $6,737 
 December 31,
2018

December 31,
2017

December 31,
2016

Cash and cash equivalents$8,926
$6,006
$8,555
Cash and cash equivalents included in assets held for sale
13
49
Cash and cash equivalents included in assets held for sale — discontinued
   operations
151
97

Cash and cash equivalents included in other assets1
241
257
246
Cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents$9,318
$6,373
$8,850
1Amounts represent restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents in our solvency capital portfolio set aside primarily to cover pension obligations in certain of
our European and Canadian pension plans. Refer to Note 4.
2As of December 31, 2021, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents includes amounts related to assets held for sale. Refer to Note 2.
Short-Term Investments
We classify time deposits and other investments that have maturities of greater than three3 months but less than one1 year as short-term investments.
Investments in Equity and Debt Securities
Effective January 1, 2018, we adopted Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2016-01 Financial Instruments — Overall: Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities ("ASU 2016-01"), which requires us toWe measure all equity investments that do not result in consolidation and are not accounted for under the equity method at fair value and recognize any changeswith the change in earnings.fair value included in net income. We use quoted market prices to determine the fair value of equity securities with readily determinable fair values. For equity securities without readily determinable fair values, we have elected the measurement alternative under which we measure these investments at cost minus impairment, if any, plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions for the identical or a similar investment of the same issuer. Prior to the adoptionManagement assesses each of ASU 2016-01, marketable equity securities not accounted for under the equity method were classified as


trading or available-for-sale. Both realized and unrealized gains and lossesthese investments on equity securities classified as trading securities were recognized in net income. For equity securities classified as available-for-sale, realized gains and losses were included in net income. Unrealized gains and losses on equity securities classified as available-for-sale were recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) ("AOCI"), net of tax. Equity securities without readily determinable fair values were recorded at cost.an individual basis. Our investments in debt securities are carried at either amortized cost or fair value. Investments in debt securities that the Company has the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity are carried at amortized cost and classified as held-to-maturity. Investments in debt securities that are not classified as held-to-maturity are carried at fair value and classified as either trading or available-for-sale. Refer to Note 4 for additional information on our policy for investments, which includeincludes our assessment of impairments.
Trade Accounts Receivable
We record trade accounts receivable at net realizable value. This value includes an appropriate allowance for estimated uncollectible accounts to reflect any expected loss anticipated on the trade accounts receivable balances and charged to the provision for doubtful accounts. We calculate this allowance based on our history of write-offs,available relevant information, in addition to historical loss information, the level of past-due accounts based on the contractual terms of the receivables, and our relationships with, and the economic status of, our bottling partners and customers. We believe our exposure to concentrations of credit risk is limited due to the diverse geographic areas covered by our operations.
ActivityIn the fourth quarter of 2020, the Company started a trade accounts receivable factoring program in certain countries. Under this program we can elect to sell trade accounts receivables to unaffiliated financial institutions at a discount. In these factoring arrangements, for ease of administration, the allowanceCompany collects customer payments related to the factored receivables and remits those payments to the financial institutions. The Company sold $6,266 million and $185 million of trade accounts receivables under this program during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively, and the costs of factoring such receivables were not material. The Company accounts for doubtfulthis program as a sale, and accordingly, the trade receivables sold are excluded from trade accounts was as followsreceivable on our consolidated balance sheet. The cash received from the financial institutions is classified within the operating activities section in our consolidated statement of cash flows.
Inventories
Inventories consist primarily of raw materials and packaging (which include ingredients and supplies) and finished goods (which include concentrates and syrups in our concentrate operations and finished beverages in our finished product operations). Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value. We determine cost on the basis of the average cost or first-in, first-out methods.
67





Inventories consisted of the following (in millions):
Year Ended December 31,2018
 2017
 2016
Balance at beginning of year$477
 $466
 $352
Net charges to costs and expenses1
29
 32
 126
Write-offs(4) (10) (10)
Other2
(13) (11) (2)
Balance at end of year$489
 $477
 $466
1
The 2016 amount was primarily related to concentrate sales receivables from our bottling partner in Venezuela. See "Hyperinflationary Economies" discussion below for additional information.
2 Other includes foreign currency translation adjustments and the impact of reclassifying certain assets to assets held for sale. Refer to Note 2.
A significant portion of our net operating revenues and corresponding accounts receivable is derived from sales of our products in international markets. Refer to Note 3 and Note 20. We also generate a significant portion of our net operating revenues by selling concentrates and syrups to bottlers in which we have a noncontrolling interest. Refer to Note 7.
December 31,20212020
Raw materials and packaging$2,133 $2,106 
Finished goods982 791 
Other299 369 
Total inventories$3,414 $3,266 
Derivative Instruments
Our Company, whenWhen deemed appropriate, our Company uses derivatives as a risk management tool to mitigate the potential impact of certain market risks. The primary market risks managed by the Company through the use of derivative instruments are foreign currency exchange rate risk, commodity price risk and interest rate risk. All derivatives are carried at fair value in our consolidated balance sheetssheet in the following line items, as applicable: prepaid expenses and other current assets; other noncurrent assets; accounts payable and accrued expenses; and other noncurrent liabilities. The cash flow impact of the Company'sCompany’s derivative instruments is primarily included in our consolidated statementsstatement of cash flows in net cash provided by operating activities. Refer to Note 6.5.
Leases
We determine if a contract contains a lease at its inception based on whether or not the Company has the right to control the asset during the contract period and other facts and circumstances. We are the lessee in a lease contract when we obtain the right to control the asset. Operating lease right-of-use (“ROU”) assets represent our right to use an underlying asset for the lease term and are included in the line item other noncurrent assets on our consolidated balance sheet. Operating lease liabilities represent our obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease and are included in the line items accounts payable and accrued expenses and other noncurrent liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet. Operating lease ROU assets and operating lease liabilities are recognized based on the present value of the future minimum lease payments over the lease term at the commencement date. Leases with a lease term of 12 months or less at inception are not recorded on our consolidated balance sheet and are expensed on a straight-line basis over the lease term in our consolidated statement of income. When determining the lease term, we include renewal or termination options that we are reasonably certain to exercise. As most of our leases do not provide an implicit interest rate, we use our local incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at the commencement date in determining the present value of future payments. When our contracts contain lease and non-lease components, we account for both components as a single lease component. Refer to Note 9.
We have various contracts for certain fountain equipment under which we are the lessor. These leases meet the criteria for operating lease classification. Lease income associated with these leases is not material.
Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost. Repair and maintenance costs that do not improve service potential or extend economic life are expensed as incurred. Depreciation is recorded principally by the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of our assets, which are reviewed periodically and generally have the following ranges: buildings and improvements: 40 years or less; and machinery equipment and vehicle fleet:equipment: 20 years or less. Land is not depreciated, and construction in progress is not depreciated until ready for service. Leasehold improvements are amortized using the straight-line method over the shorter of the remaining lease term, including renewalsrenewal options that we are deemedreasonably certain to be reasonably assured,exercise, or the estimated useful life of the improvement. Depreciation is not recorded during the period in which a long-lived asset or disposal group is classified as held for sale, even if the asset or disposal group continues to generate revenue during the period. Depreciation expense, including the depreciation expense of assets under capital lease,finance leases, totaled $999$1,262 million, $1,131$1,301 million and $1,575$1,208 million in 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, respectively. Amortization expense for leasehold improvements totaled $15 million, $18 million $19 million and $22$18 million in 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, respectively. Refer to Note 8.

68






The following table summarizes our property, plant and equipment (in millions):
December 31,20212020
Land$652 $676 
Buildings and improvements4,349 4,782 
Machinery and equipment13,861 14,242 
Property, plant and equipment — cost18,862 19,700 
Less: Accumulated depreciation8,942 8,923 
Property, plant and equipment — net$9,920 $10,777 
Certain events or changes in circumstances may indicate that the recoverability of the carrying amount of property, plant and equipment should be assessed, including, among others, a significant decrease in market value, a significant change in the business climate in a particular market, or a current period operating or cash flow loss combined with historical losses or projected future losses. When such events or changes in circumstances are present and an impairmenta recoverability test is performed, we estimate the future cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset or asset group and its eventual disposition. These estimated future cash flows are consistent with those we use in our internal planning. If the sum of the expected future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) is less than the carrying amount, we recognize an impairment loss.charge. The impairment losscharge recognized is the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset or asset group exceeds the fair value. We use a variety of methodologies to determine the fair value of property, plant and equipment, including appraisals and discounted cash flow models. These appraisals and models whichinclude assumptions we believe are consistent with the assumptions we believe hypothetical marketplace participantsthose a market participant would use. Refer to Note 17.
Goodwill, Trademarks and Other Intangible Assets
We classify intangible assets into three categories: (1) intangible assets with definite lives subject to amortization, (2) intangible assets with indefinite lives not subject to amortization and (3) goodwill. We determine the useful lives of our identifiable intangible assets after considering the specific facts and circumstances related to each intangible asset. Factors we consider when determining useful lives include the contractual term of any agreement related to the asset, the historical performance of the asset, the Company'sCompany’s long-term strategy for using the asset, any laws or other local regulations which could impact the useful life of the asset, and other economic factors, including competition and specific market conditions. Intangible assets that are deemed to have definite lives are amortized, primarily on a straight-line basis, over their useful lives, generally ranging from 1 toless than 20 years. Refer to Note 9.7.
When facts andevents or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of definite-lived intangible assets may not be recoverable, management assesses theperforms a recoverability test of the carrying value by preparing estimates of sales volume and the resulting profit and cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset or asset group and its eventual disposition. These estimated future cash flows are consistent with those we use in our internal planning. If the sum of the expected future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) is less than the carrying amount, we recognize an impairment loss.charge. The impairment losscharge recognized is the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset or asset group exceeds the fair value. We use a variety of methodologies to determine the fair value of these assets, including discounted cash flow models, which include assumptions we believe are consistent with the assumptions we believe hypothetical marketplace participantsthose a market participant would use.
We test intangible assets determined to have indefinite useful lives, including trademarks, franchise rights and goodwill, for impairment annually, or more frequently if events or circumstances indicate that assets might be impaired. Our Company performs these annual impairment tests as of the first day of our third fiscal quarter. We use a variety of methodologies in conducting impairment assessmentstests of indefinite-lived intangible assets, including, but not limited to, discounted cash flow models, which are based on theinclude assumptions we believe hypothetical marketplace participantsare consistent with those a market participant would use. For indefinite-lived intangible assets, other than goodwill, if the carrying amount exceeds the fair value, an impairment charge is recognized in an amount equal to that excess. The Company has the option to perform a qualitative assessment of indefinite-lived intangible assets, other than goodwill, rather than completing the impairment test. The Company must assess whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of the intangible asset is less than its carrying amount. If the Company concludes that this is the case, it must perform the impairment testing described above. Otherwise, the Company does not need to perform any further assessment.
We perform impairment tests of goodwill at our reporting unit level, which is generally one level below our operating segments. Our operating segments are primarily based on geographic responsibility, which is consistent with the way management runs our business. Our geographic operating segments are generally subdivided into smaller geographic regions. These geographic regions or territories that we sometimes refer to as "business units." These business units are also our reporting units. Our Global Ventures operating segment includes the results of our Costa Limited (“Costa”), innocent and doğadan businesses as well as fees earned pursuant to distribution coordination agreements between the Company and Monster Beverage Corporation (“Monster”), each of which is its own reporting unit. The Bottling
69





Investments operating segment includes all Company-owned orof our consolidated bottling operations, regardless of geographic location. Generally, each Company-owned or consolidated bottling operation within our Bottling Investments operating segment is its own reporting unit. Goodwill is assigned to the reporting unit or units that benefit from the synergies arising from each business combination.
In order to test for goodwill impairment, the Company compares the fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying value,
including goodwill. If the fair value of the reporting unit is lowerless than its carrying amount, goodwill is written down for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair value. However, the lossimpairment charge recognized cannot exceed the carrying amount of goodwill. We typically use discounted cash flow models to determine the fair value of a reporting unit. The assumptions used in these models are consistent with those we believe a hypothetical marketplacemarket participant would use. The Company has the option to perform a qualitative assessment of goodwill in order to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of athe reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, including goodwill and other intangible assets.amount. If the Company concludes that this is the case, it must perform the impairment testing discussed above. Otherwise, the Company does not need to perform any further testing.


assessment.
Impairment charges related to intangible assets, including goodwill, are generally recorded in the line item other operating charges or, to the extent they relate to equity method investees, in the line item equity income (loss) — net in our consolidated statementsstatement of income.
Contingencies
Our Company is involved in various legal proceedings and tax matters. Due to their nature, such legal proceedings and tax matters involve inherent uncertainties including, but not limited to, court rulings, negotiations between affected parties and governmental actions. Management assesses the probability of loss for such contingencies and accrues a liability and/or discloses the relevant circumstances, as appropriate. Refer to Note 12.11.
Stock-Based Compensation
Our Company grants long-term equity awards under its stock-based compensation plans to certain employees of the Company. These awards include stock options, restricted stockperformance share units, restricted stock and performance–based sharerestricted stock units. The fair value of our stock option grants is estimated on the grant date using a Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model. The Company recognizes compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the period the stock option grantaward is earned by the employee, which is generally four years.
The fair value of ourrestricted stock, restricted stock units restricted stock and certain performance-basedperformance share units is the quotedclosing market valueprice per share of the Company'sCompany’s stock on the grant date less the present value of the expected dividends not received during the relevantvesting period. For most performance-based share units granted from 2014 to 2017 and for performance-based share units granted to executives in 2018, theThe Company includesincluded a relative total shareowner return ("TSR"(“TSR”) modifier for most performance share unit awards granted from 2014 through 2017 as well as for performance share unit awards granted to determine the number of shares earned at the end of the performance period.executives from 2018 through 2021. For these awards, the number of sharesperformance share units earned based on the certified achievement of the predefined performance criteria will be reduced or increased if the Company'sCompany’s total shareowner return over the performance period relative to a predefined compensation comparator group of companies fallsfell outside of a definedpredefined range. The fair value of performance-basedperformance share units that include thea TSR modifier is determined using a Monte Carlo valuation model.
In the reporting period it becomes probable that the minimum performance threshold specified in the performance-basedperformance share unit award will be achieved, we recognize compensation expense for the proportionate share of the total fair value of the awardperformance share units related to the vesting period that has already lapsed.lapsed for the performance share units expected to vest. The remaining fair value of the awardperformance share units expected to vest is expensed on a straight-line basis over the balanceremainder of the vesting period. In the event the Company determines it is no longer probable that we will achieve the minimum performance threshold specified in the award will be achieved, we reverse all of the previously recognized compensation expense in the reporting period such a determination is made.
The Company has made a policy election to estimate the number of stock-based compensation awards that are expected towill ultimately vest to determine the amount of compensation expense recognized in earnings.each reporting period. Forfeiture estimates are trued-up throughat the end of the vesting date,period in order to ensure that total compensation expense is recognized only for those awards that ultimately vest. Refer to Note 13.12.
Income Taxes
Income tax expense includes U.S., state, local and international income taxes, plus a provision for U.S. taxes on undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries and other prescribed foreign entities not deemed to be indefinitely reinvested.taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial reportingbook basis and the tax basis of existing assets and liabilities. The tax rate used to determine the deferred tax assets and liabilities is the enacted tax rate for the year and manner in which the differences are expected to reverse. Valuation allowances are recorded to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount that will more likely than not be realized. The Company records taxes that are collected from customers and remitted to governmental authorities on a net basis in our consolidated statements of income.
70





The Company is involved in various tax matters, with respect to some of which the outcome is uncertain. We establish reserves to remove some or all of the tax benefit of any of our tax positions at the time we determine that it becomes uncertain based upon one of the following conditions: (1) the tax position is not "more“more likely than not"not” to be sustained,sustained; (2) the tax position is "more“more likely than not"not” to be sustained, but for a lesser amount,amount; or (3) the tax position is "more“more likely than not"not” to be sustained, but not in the financial period in which the tax position was originally taken. For purposes of evaluating whether or not a tax position is uncertain, (1) we presume the tax position will be examined by the relevant taxing authority that has full knowledge of all relevant information; (2) the technical merits of a tax position are derived from authorities such as legislation and statutes, legislative intent, regulations, rulings and case lawcaselaw and their applicability to the facts and circumstances of the tax position; and (3) each tax position is evaluated without consideration of the possibility of offset or aggregation with other tax positions taken. A number of years may elapse before a particular uncertain tax position is audited and finally resolved or when a tax assessment is raised. The number of years subject to tax assessments varies depending on the tax jurisdiction. The tax benefit


that has been previously reserved because of a failure to meet the "more“more likely than not"not” recognition threshold would be recognized in income tax expense in the first interim period when the uncertainty disappears under any one of the following conditions: (1) the tax position is "more“more likely than not"not” to be sustained, (2) the tax position, amount, and/or timing is ultimately settled through negotiation or litigation, or (3) the statute of limitations for the tax position has expired. Refer to Note 1211 and Note 15.14.
Translation and Remeasurement
We translate the assets and liabilities of our foreign subsidiaries from their respective functional currencies to U.S. dollars at the appropriate spot rates as of the balance sheet date. Generally, our foreign subsidiaries use the local currency as their functional currency. Changes in the carrying valuevalues of these assets and liabilities attributable to fluctuations in spot rates are recognized in net foreign currency translation adjustment,adjustments, a component of AOCI.accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (“AOCI”). Refer to Note 16. Income15. Accounts in our consolidated statement accountsof income are translated using the monthly average exchange rates during the year.
Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in a currency that is different from a reporting entity'sentity’s functional currency must first be remeasured from the applicable currency to the legal entity'sentity’s functional currency. The effect of this remeasurement process is recognized in the line item other income (loss) — net in our consolidated statementsstatement of income and is partially offset by the impact of our economic hedging program for certain exposures on our consolidated balance sheets.sheet. Refer to Note 6.
Hyperinflationary Economies
A hyperinflationary economy is one that has cumulative inflation of 100 percent or more over a three-year period. In accordance with U.S. GAAP, local subsidiaries in hyperinflationary economies are required to use the U.S. dollar as their functional currency and remeasure the monetary assets and liabilities not denominated in U.S. dollars using the rate applicable to conversion of a currency for purposes of dividend remittances. All exchange gains and losses resulting from remeasurement are recognized currently in income.
Venezuela has been designated as a hyperinflationary economy. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Venezuelan government devalued its currency and changed its official and most preferential exchange rate, which should be used for purchases of certain essential goods, to 10 bolivars per U.S. dollar from 6.3. The official and most preferential rate is now known as DIPRO and the former official rate has been eliminated. The Venezuelan government replaced the former open market exchange rate with the DICOM rate, which is allowed to float freely and is expected to fluctuate based on supply and demand. As a result, management determined that the DICOM rate was the most appropriate legally available rate to remeasure the net monetary assets of our Venezuelan subsidiary.
We sell concentrate to our bottling partner in Venezuela from outside the country. These sales are denominated in U.S. dollars. During the year ended December 31, 2016, as a result of the continued lack of liquidity and our revised assessment of the U.S. dollar value we expected to realize upon the conversion of Venezuelan bolivars into U.S. dollars by our bottling partner to pay our concentrate sales receivables, we recorded a write-down of $76 million, which was recorded in the line item other operating charges in our consolidated statement of income.
We also have certain U.S. dollar-denominated intangible assets associated with products sold in Venezuela. As a result of weaker sales, the volatility of foreign currency exchange rates resulting from continued instability and the Company's revised expectations regarding the convertibility of the local currency, we recognized an impairment charge of $34 million during the year ended December 31, 2017, which was recorded in the line item other operating charges in our consolidated statement of income. As a result of this impairment charge, the remaining carrying value of all U.S. dollar-denominated intangible assets associated with products sold in Venezuela is zero.
Refer to Note 20 for the impact these items had on our operating segments and Corporate.5.
Recently Adopted Accounting Guidance
In May 2014,February 2018, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB"(“FASB”) issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which replaces most existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. GAAP and is intended to improve and converge with international standards the financial reporting requirements for revenue from contracts with customers. ASU 2014-09 and its amendments were included primarily in ASC 606. The core principle of ASC 606 is that an entity should recognize revenue for the transfer of goods or services equal to the amount that it expects to be entitled to receive for those goods or services. ASC 606 also requires additional disclosures about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments. We adopted ASC 606 effective January 1, 2018, using the modified retrospective method. We recognized a cumulative effect adjustment to decrease the opening balance of reinvested earnings as of January 1, 2018 by $257 million, net of tax. The Company has changed our accounting policies and practices, business processes, systems and controls, as well as designed and implemented specific controls over our evaluation


of the impact of the new guidance on the Company, including the cumulative effect calculation, disclosure requirements and the collection of relevant data for the reporting process. Refer to Note 3.
In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, which addresses certain aspects of the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of financial instruments. ASU 2016-01 was effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2018, and we are now recognizing any changes in the fair value of certain equity investments in net income as prescribed by the new standard rather than in other comprehensive income ("OCI"). We recognized a cumulative effect adjustment to increase the opening balance of reinvested earnings as of January 1, 2018 by $409 million, net of tax. Refer to Note 4 for additional disclosures required by this ASU.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Compensation — Stock Compensation: Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting.The standard is intended to simplify several areas of accounting for share-based compensation arrangements, including the income tax impact, classification on the statement of cash flows and forfeitures. The Company adopted ASU 2016-09 on January 1, 2017 by prospectively recognizing excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies in our consolidated statement of income as the awards vested or were settled. Effective January 1, 2017, the Company also prospectively presented excess tax benefits as an operating activity, rather than a financing activity, in our consolidated statement of cash flows. Had these changes been required to be adopted retrospectively, during the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company would have recognized an additional $130 million of excess tax benefits in our consolidated statement of income. Additionally, during the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company would have reduced our financing activities and increased our operating activities by $130 million in our consolidated statement of cash flows. The Company has elected, consistent with past practice, to estimate the number of awards that are expected to vest to determine the amount of stock-based compensation expense recognized in earnings.
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments, which addresses eight specific cash flow issues with the objective of reducing the existing diversity in practice. ASU 2016-15 was effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2018 and was adopted using the retrospective transition approach to all periods presented. The impact of the adoption of ASU 2016-15 on our consolidated statement of cash flows was a change in presentation related to our proceeds from the settlement of corporate-owned life insurance policies. We revised our consolidated statement of cash flows to reflect these proceeds in the line item other investing activities, which were previously presented in the line item net change in operating assets and liabilities. During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the amount of proceeds received from the settlement of corporate-owned life insurance policies was $65 million and $3 million, respectively.
In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-16, Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory ("ASU 2016-16"), which requires the Company to recognize the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory when the transfer occurs. ASU 2016-16 was effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2018 and was adopted using a modified retrospective basis. We recorded a $2.9 billion cumulative effect adjustment to increase the opening balance of reinvested earnings, with the majority of the offset being recorded in the line item deferred income tax assets in our consolidated balance sheet. Refer to Note 15.
In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, Restricted Cash. The amendments in this update address diversity in practice that exists in the classification and presentation of changes in amounts generally described as restricted cash and require that a statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents and amounts that an entity defines as restricted cash for purposes of this standard or otherwise does not present in the line item cash and cash equivalents on its balance sheet. ASU 2016-18 was effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2018 and was adopted using the retrospective transition method to all periods presented.
Prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-18, we presented the transfer of cash and cash equivalents into or out of our captive insurance companies in the line items purchases of investments and proceeds from disposals of investments in our consolidated statement of cash flows. We did not present the purchases of investments and proceeds from disposals of investments within our captive insurance companies. Cash flows related to cash and cash equivalents included in our insurance captives are now presented in the line items purchases of investments and proceeds from disposals of investments within the investing activities section of our consolidated statement of cash flows. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the purchases of investments and proceeds from disposals of investments within our captive insurance companies were $777 million and $773 million, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the purchases of investments and proceeds from disposals of investments within our captive insurance companies were $1,388 million and $1,304 million, respectively.
Prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-18, we treated the change in cash and cash equivalents included in assets held for sale as an adjustment to the line item other investing activities within our consolidated statement of cash flows. With the adoption of this ASU, we no longer make this adjustment and we revised the prior year to remove this adjustment. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the change in cash and cash equivalents included in assets held for sale was $36 million. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the change in cash and cash equivalents included in assets held for sale was $94 million. Refer to


the heading "Cash, Cash Equivalents, Restricted Cash and Restricted Cash Equivalents" above for additional disclosures required by this ASU.
In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-07, Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost, which requires that the service cost component of the Company's net periodic pension cost and net periodic postretirement benefit cost be included in the same line item as other compensation costs arising from services rendered by employees, with the non-service cost components of net periodic benefit cost and other benefit plan charges and credits being classified outside of a subtotal of income from operations. ASU 2017-07 was effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2018 and was adopted retrospectively for the presentation of the other components of net periodic benefit cost and other benefit plan charges and credits in our consolidated statements of income. As part of our adoption, we elected to use a practical expedient which allows us to use information previously disclosed in our note on pension and other postretirement benefit plans as the estimation basis for applying the retrospective presentation requirements of this ASU. During the years ended December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, we reclassified $98 million and $31 million of expense, respectively, related to our non-service cost components of net periodic benefit cost and other benefit plan charges and credits from operating income to other income (loss) — net in our consolidated statements of income. Refer to Note 14 for additional disclosures required by this ASU.
In March 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-05, Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118. The amendments in this update provide guidance on when to record and disclose provisional amounts for certain income tax effects of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act ("Tax Reform Act"). The amendments also require any provisional amounts or subsequent adjustments to be included in net income from continuing operations. Additionally, this ASU discusses required disclosures that an entity must make with regard to the Tax Reform Act. This ASU is effective immediately as new information is available to adjust provisional amounts that were previously recorded. The Company adopted this standard and subsequently finalized the accounting based on the guidance, interpretations and data available as of December 31, 2018. Refer to Note 15 for additional information on the Tax Reform Act.
Accounting Guidance Not Yet Adopted
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases, which requires lessees to recognize right-of-use assets, representing their right to use the underlying asset for the lease term, and lease liabilities on the balance sheet for all leases with terms greater than 12 months. The guidance also modifies the classification criteria and the accounting for sales-type and direct financing leases by lessors. Additionally, the guidance requires qualitative and quantitative disclosures designed to assess the amount, timing and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. The Company has substantially completed its preparation for the adoption of this new accounting standard. This included assessing the completeness of our lease arrangements, evaluating practical expedients and accounting policy elections, executing changes to our business process, which include our systems and controls, and implementing software to meet the reporting requirements of this standard.
ASU 2016-02 is effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2019. The standard requires the use of a modified retrospective transition approach, which includes a number of optional practical expedients that entities may elect to apply. The Company expects to elect certain practical expedients, including the package of practical expedients to not reassess prior conclusions related to contracts containing leases, lease classification and initial direct costs, and is evaluating the other practical expedients available under the guidance. The Company also plans to elect the optional transition method that will give companies the option to use the effective date as the date of initial application on transition, and as a result, we will not adjust our comparative period financial information or make the new required lease disclosures for periods before the effective date. The Company anticipates the adoption of this new standard will result in an increase of approximately 1 percent of total assets and liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet. This estimate does not include transactions that closed in the first quarter of 2019, such as Costa Limited ("Costa"). While we are substantially complete with the process of quantifying the impacts that will result from applying the new guidance, our assessment will be finalized during the first quarter of 2019. We do not expect the new standard to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated statement of income. As the impact of this standard is noncash in nature, we do not anticipate its adoption having an impact on the Company's consolidated statement of cash flows.
In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-12, Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities, which eliminates the requirement to separately measure and report hedge ineffectiveness and requires companies to recognize all elements of hedge accounting that impact earnings in the same line item in the statement of income where the hedged item resides. The amendments include new alternatives for measuring the hedged item for fair value hedges of interest rate risk and ease the requirements for effectiveness testing, hedge documentation and applying the critical terms match method. Finally, the standard introduces new alternatives that permit companies to reduce the risk of material error if the shortcut method is misapplied. ASU 2017-12 is effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2019 and is required to be applied prospectively. The adoption of


this ASU is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated balance sheet, statement of income or statement of cash flows.

In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-02, Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income(“ASU 2018-02”), which permits entities to reclassify the disproportionate income tax effects of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (“Tax Reform ActAct”) on items within accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) ("AOCI")AOCI to reinvested earnings. These disproportionate income tax effect items are referred to as "stranded“stranded tax effects." Amendments” The amendments in this update only relate to the reclassification of the income tax effects of the Tax Reform Act. Other accounting guidance that requires the effect of changes in tax laws or rates to be included in net income from continuing operations is not affected by this update. We adopted ASU 2018-02 is effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2019 and should be applied either in the period of adoption or retrospectively to each period in which the effect of the change in the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate in the Tax Reform Act is recognized.2019. We have elected to apply this standard in the period of adoption and will recognizerecognized a cumulative effect adjustment to increase the opening balance of reinvested earnings as of January 1, 2019. We expect this cumulative2019 by $558 million related to the effect adjustment to increase reinvested earnings by approximately $500 million.that the change in the income tax rate had on the gross deferred tax amounts of items remaining in AOCI.
NOTE 2: ACQUISITIONS AND DIVESTITURES
Acquisitions
During 2018,2021, our Company'sCompany’s acquisitions of businesses, equity method investments and nonmarketable securities totaled $1,040$4,766 million, which includedprimarily related to the acquisition of the 51 percent controlling interest in the Philippine bottling operations from Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. ("Coca-Cola FEMSA"), an equity method investee. Refer to the "Philippine Bottling Operations" section within this note below for further details. Additionally, we acquired a minorityremaining ownership interest in BA Sports Nutrition, LLC ("BodyArmor"(“BodyArmor”). We account for
During 2020, our minority interest in BodyArmor as an equity method investment based on our equity ownership percentage and our representation on their Management Committee. We obtained an option to acquire the remaining ownership interests in BodyArmor based on an agreed-upon formula, which becomes exercisable in 2021. Upon the expiration of the Company's option, BodyArmor has the option to sell their remaining interests to the Company based on the same agreed‑upon formula. The Company also acquired additional ownership interests in the Company's franchise bottlers in the United Arab Emirates and in Oman, both of which were previously equity method investees of the Company. As a result of the additional interest acquired in the Oman bottler, we obtained a controlling interest, resulting in its consolidation.
During 2017, our Company'sCompany’s acquisitions of businesses, equity method investments and nonmarketable securities totaled $3,809$1,052 million, of which $3,150 million related to the transition of ABI's 54.5 percent controlling interest in CCBA to the Company, resulting in its consolidation in October 2017. The financial position and results of operations of CCBA are being accounted for as a discontinued operation. Refer to the "Discontinued Operations" section within this note below for further details. Additionally, in conjunction with the refranchising of Coca-Cola Refreshments' ("CCR") Southwest operating unit ("Southwest Transaction"), we obtained an equity interest in AC Bebidas, S. de R.L. de C.V. ("AC Bebidas"), a subsidiary of Arca Continental, S.A.B. de C.V. ("Arca"), primarily for noncash consideration. Refer to the "North America Refranchising —United States" section within this note below for further details. The remaining activity primarily related to the acquisition of AdeS, a plant-based beverage business, by the Company and several of its bottling partnersremaining ownership interest in Latin America, and the acquisition of the U.S. rights to the Topo Chico premium sparkling water brand from AC Bebidas, an equity method investee.fairlife, LLC (“fairlife”).
During 2016,2019, our Company'sCompany’s acquisitions of businesses, equity method investments and nonmarketable securities totaled $838$5,542 million, which primarily related to our acquisitionthe acquisitions of Xiamen Culiangwang Beverage Technology Co., Ltd. ("China Green"Costa, the remaining ownership interest in C.H.I. Limited (“CHI”), and controlling interests in bottling operations in Zambia, Kenya and Eswatini.
BA Sports Nutrition, LLC
In November 2021, the Company acquired the remaining 85 percent ownership interest in, and now owns 100 percent of, BodyArmor, which offers a makerline of plant-based proteinsports performance and hydration beverages in China,the United States. We acquired the remaining ownership interest in exchange for approximately $5,600 million of cash, of which $4,745 million was paid at close, net of cash acquired. The purchase price reflected the contractual discount included in the purchase option we obtained with our initial
71





investment in 2018. The remaining $860 million of the purchase price was held back related to indemnification obligations, of which $540 million was included in the line item accounts payable and accrued expenses and $320 million was included in the line item other noncurrent liabilities in our consolidated balance sheet. Upon consolidation, we recognized a gain of $834 million resulting from the remeasurement of our previously held equity interest in BodyArmor to fair value. The fair value of our previously held equity interest was determined using a discounted cash flow model based on Level 3 inputs. The gain was recorded in the line item other income (loss) — net in our consolidated statement of income. As of December 31, 2021, $4.2 billion of the purchase price was preliminarily allocated to the BodyArmor trademark and $2.2 billion was preliminarily allocated to goodwill, of which $1.2 billion is tax deductible. The goodwill recognized as part of this acquisition is primarily related to the synergistic value created from leveraging the capabilities, assets and scale of the Company and the opportunity for international expansion. It also includes certain other intangible assets that do not qualify for separate recognition, such as an assembled workforce. Of the total amount preliminarily allocated to goodwill, $1.9 billion has been assigned to the North America operating segment and $0.3 billion has been assigned to our other geographic operating segments. The preliminary allocation of the purchase price is subject to refinement when valuations are finalized. As of December 31, 2021, the valuations that have not been finalized primarily relate to other intangible assets and operating lease ROU assets and operating lease liabilities. The final purchase price allocation will be completed no later than the fourth quarter of 2022.
fairlife, LLC
In January 2020, the Company acquired the remaining 57.5 percent ownership interest in, and now owns 100 percent of, fairlife. fairlife offers a broad portfolio of products in the value-added dairy category across North America. Upon consolidation, we recognized a gain of $902 million resulting from the remeasurement of our previously held equity interest in fairlife to fair value. The fair value of our previously held equity interest was determined using a discounted cash flow model based on Level 3 inputs. The gain was recorded in the line item other income (loss) — net in our consolidated statement of income. We acquired the remaining ownership interest in exchange for $979 million of cash, net of cash acquired, and effectively settled our $306 million note receivable from fairlife at the recorded amount. Under the terms of the agreement, we are subject to making future milestone payments which are contingent on fairlife achieving certain financial targets through 2024 and, if achieved, are payable in 2021, 2023 and 2025. These milestone payments are based on agreed-upon formulas related to fairlife’s operating results, the resulting values of which are not subject to a ceiling. Under the applicable accounting guidance, we recorded a $270 million liability representing our best estimate of the fair value of this contingent consideration as of the acquisition date. The fair value of this contingent consideration was determined using a Monte Carlo valuation model based on Level 3 inputs, including management’s latest estimates of future operating results. We are required to remeasure this liability to fair value quarterly with any changes in the fair value recorded in income until the final milestone payment is made. Upon finalization of purchase accounting, $1.3 billion of the purchase price was allocated to the fairlife trademark and $0.8 billion was allocated to goodwill. The goodwill recognized as part of this acquisition is primarily related to synergistic value created from the opportunity for additional expansion. It also includes certain other intangible assets that do not qualify for separate recognition, such as an assembled workforce. The goodwill is not tax deductible and has been assigned to the North America operating segment.
During the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, we recorded charges of $369 million and $51 million, respectively. These charges related to the remeasurement of the contingent consideration liability to fair value and were recorded in the line item other operating charges in our consolidated statements of income. During the year ended December 31, 2021, we made the first milestone payment of $100 million based on fairlife meeting its financial targets in 2020.
Costa Limited
In January 2019, the Company acquired Costa in exchange for $4.9 billion of cash, net of cash acquired. Costa is a coffee business with retail stores in more than 30 countries, the Costa Express vending system and a minority investmentstate-of-the-art roastery. We believe this acquisition will allow us to increase our presence in the hot beverage market, as Costa has a scalable platform across multiple formats and channels, including opportunities to introduce ready-to-drink products.Upon finalization of purchase accounting, $2.4 billion of the purchase price was allocated to the Costa trademark and $2.5 billion was allocated to goodwill. The goodwill recognized as part of this acquisition is primarily related to synergistic value created from the opportunity for additional expansion as well as our ability to market and distribute Costa in ready-to-drink form throughout our bottling system. It also includes certain other intangible assets that do not qualify for separate recognition, such as an assembled workforce. The goodwill is not tax deductible and has been assigned to the Global Ventures operating segment, except for $108 million which was assigned to the Europe, Middle East and Africa operating segment.
C.H.I. Limited
In January 2019, the Company acquired the remaining 60 percent ownership interest in CHI, Limited ("CHI"), a Nigerian producer of value-added dairy and juice beverages which is accountedand iced tea, in exchange for under the equity method$257 million of accounting. Undercash, net of cash acquired, under the terms of the agreement for our original investment in CHI, the Company acquired the remaining ownership interest from the existing shareowners in January 2019.
Philippine Bottling Operations
In December 2018, the Company acquired the 51 percent controlling interest in the Philippine bottling operations held by Coca‑Cola FEMSA, an equity method investee, in exchange for $715 million of cash. The acquired business had $345 million of cash on hand upon acquisition. The acquisition was a result of Coca-Cola FEMSA exercising the option to sell its ownership interest to the Company. Coca-Cola FEMSA obtained this option when it originally acquired the controlling interest from the Company in 2013. As a result of this acquisition, we now own 100 percent of the Philippine bottling operations.CHI. Upon consolidation, we recognized a net chargeloss of $32$118 million, which included
72





the remeasurement of our previously held equity interest in the Philippine bottling operationsCHI to fair value and the reversal of the related cumulative translation adjustments. The fair value of our previously held equity investment was determined using a discounted cash flow model based on Level 3 inputs. The net chargeloss was recorded in the line item other income (loss) — net in our consolidated statement of income.


Divestitures
During 2018,2021, proceeds from disposals of businesses, equity method investments and nonmarketable securities totaled $1,362$2,180 million, which primarily related to proceeds from the refranchising of our Canadian and Latin American bottling operations, as well as the sale of our ownership interest in Coca-Cola Amatil Limited (“CCA”), an equity method investee, to Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc (“CCEP”), also an equity method investee. We received cash proceeds of $1,738 million and recognized a net gain of $695 million as a result of the sale and the related reversal of cumulative translation adjustments. Also included were the sale of our ownership interest in Corporación Lindley S.A. ("Lindley").an equity method investee and the sale of a portion of our ownership interest in another equity method investee. We received cash proceeds of $293 million and recognized a net gain of $114 million as a result of these sales.
During 2017,2020, proceeds from disposals of businesses, equity method investments and nonmarketable securities totaled $3,821$189 million, which primarily related to proceeds from the refranchising of certainsale of our bottling territoriesownership interest in North AmericaPiedmont Coca-Cola Bottling Partnership to Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc., an equity method investee. We received cash proceeds of $100 million and recognized a net loss of $2 million as a result of this sale. Also included were the sale of our China bottling operations.ownership interest in an equity method investee and the sale of a portion of our ownership interest in another equity method investee. We received cash proceeds of $62 million and recognized a net gain of $35 million as a result of these sales.
During 2016,2019, proceeds from disposals of businesses, equity method investments and nonmarketable securities totaled $1,035$429 million, which primarily related to proceeds fromthe sale of a portion of our ownership interest in Embotelladora Andina S.A. (“Andina”) and the refranchising of certain of our bottling territories in North America.
Latin America Bottling Operations
As of December 31, 2017, certain of the Company's bottling operations in Latin America were classifiedIndia. As a result of these transactions, we recognized gains of $39 million and $73 million, respectively. We continue to account for our remaining ownership interest in Andina as held for sale. During 2018, the Company sold its bottling operations in Latin America to Coca-Cola FEMSA, an equity method investee. We received net cash proceeds of $289 millioninvestment as a result of these salesour representation on Andina’s Board of Directors and recognized a net gain of $47 million, which was included in the line item other income (loss) — net in our consolidated statement of income.governance rights.
Corporación Lindley S.A.
In September 2018, we sold our equity ownership in Lindley to AC Bebidas, an equity method investee. We received net cash proceeds of $507 million and recognized a net gain of $296 million during the year ended December 31, 2018, which was included in the line item other income (loss) — net in our consolidated statement of income.
North America Refranchising Canada
In September 2018, the Company completed its North America refranchising with the sale of its Canadian bottling operations. We received initial net cash proceeds of $518 million and recognized a net charge of $385 million during the year ended December 31, 2018, which was included in the line item other income (loss) — net in our consolidated statement of income.
North America Refranchising United States
In conjunction with implementing a new beverage partnership model in North America, the Company refranchised bottling territories in the United States that were previously managed by CCR to certain of our unconsolidated bottling partners. These territories generally border these bottlers' existing territories, allowing each bottler to better service local customers and provide more efficient execution. By entering into comprehensive beverage agreements ("CBAs") with each of the bottlers, we granted certain exclusive territory rights for the distribution, promotion, marketing and sale of Company-owned and licensed beverage products as defined by the CBA.
Each CBA generally has a term of 10 years and is renewable, in most cases by the bottler and in some cases by the Company, indefinitely for successive additional terms of 10 years each. Under the CBA, except for the CBA entered into in conjunction with the Southwest Transaction and for additional territories sold to AC Bebidas as well as the CBA entered into with Liberty Coca-Cola Beverages the bottlers make ongoing quarterly paymentsAfrica Proprietary Limited
Due to the Company based on their gross profit in the refranchised territories throughout the term of the CBA, including renewals, in exchange for the grant of the exclusive territory rights. LibertyCompany’s original intent to refranchise Coca-Cola Beverages the co-owners of which are former management of CCR, will make ongoing quarterly payments based on the gross profit in its refranchised territories upon the earlier of reaching a predefined level of profitability, or the 41st quarter following the closing date.
Contemporaneously with the grant of these rights, the Company sold the distribution assets, certain working capital items, and the exclusive rights to distribute certain beverage brands not owned by the Company, but distributed by CCR, in each of these territories to the respective bottlers in exchange for cash, except for the territory included in the Southwest Transaction. As discussed further below, we did not receive cash in the Southwest Transaction for these items.
In 2016, the Company formed a new National Product Supply System ("NPSS") to facilitate optimal operation of the U.S. product supply system. Under the NPSS, the Company and several of its independent producing bottlers administer key
national product supply activities for these bottlers. Additionally, CCR sold production assets to these independent producing bottlers in exchange for cash, excluding production facilities included in the Southwest Transaction.
During the years ended December 31, 2018, December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, cash proceeds from these sales totaled $3 million, $2,860 million and $1,017 million, respectively. Included in the cash proceeds for the years ended December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 was $336 million and $279 million, respectively, from Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated now known as Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. ("CCCI"Africa Proprietary Limited (“CCBA”), an equity method investee. Also included in the cash


proceedsit was accounted for the year ended December 31, 2017 was $220 million from AC Bebidas and $39 million from Liberty Coca-Cola Beverages.
Under the applicable accounting guidance, we were required to derecognize all of the tangible assets sold as well as the intangible assets transferred, including distribution rights, customer relationships and an allocated portion of goodwill related to these territories. We recognized net charges of $91 million, $3,177 million and $2,456 million during the years ended December 31, 2018, December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. Included in these amounts are net charges from transactions with equity method investees or former management of $21 million, $1,104 million and $492 million, during the years ended December 31, 2018, December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. The net charges in 2018 were primarily related to post-closing adjustments as contemplated by the related agreements. The net charges in 2017 and 2016 were primarily related to the derecognition of the intangible assets transferred or reclassified as held for sale and were included inas a discontinued operation from October 2017 through the line item other income (loss) — net in our consolidated statementsfirst quarter of income. The net charges in 2017 included $236 million of expense associated with an indemnification liability related to an underfunded multi-employer benefit plan in which employees of certain refranchised territories participate. In total, we expect to recover the value of the2019. Additionally, CCBA’s property, plant and equipment was not depreciated and its definite-lived intangible assets transferredwere not amortized during this period. While the Company had discussions with a number of potential partners throughout the period CCBA was held for sale, during the second quarter of 2019 the Company updated its plans with the intent to the bottlers under the CBAs through the future quarterly payments; however,maintain its controlling stake in CCBA, which resulted in CCBA no longer qualifying as the paymentsheld for the territory rights are dependent on the bottlers' future gross profit in these territories, they are considered a form of contingent consideration.
There is diversity in practice as it relates to the accounting for contingent consideration by the seller. The seller can account for the future contingent payments receivedsale or as a gain contingency, recognizing the amounts in the statement of income only after the related contingencies are resolved and the gain is realized, which in this arrangement will be quarterly as the bottlers earn gross profit in the transferred territories. Alternatively, the seller can record a receivable for the contingent consideration at fair value on the date of sale and record any future differences between the payments received and this receivable in the statement of income as they occur. We elected the gain contingency treatment since the quarterly payments will be received throughout the terms of the CBAs, including all subsequent renewals, regardless of the cumulative amount received as compared to the value of the intangible assets transferred.
During the years ended December 31, 2018, December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company recorded charges of $34 million, $313 million and $31 million, respectively, primarily related to payments made to certain of our unconsolidated bottling partners in order to convert the bottling agreements for their legacy territories and any previously refranchised territories to a single form of CBA with additional requirements. The additional requirements generally include a binding national governance model, mandatory incidence pricing and additional core performance requirements, among other things.discontinued operation. As a result of these conversions,this change, we recorded a $160 million adjustment to reduce the legacy territories and any previously refranchised territories for each of the related bottling partners will be governed under similar CBAs, which will provide consistency across each such bottler's respective territory, as well as consistency with other U.S. bottlers that have been granted or converted to this form of CBA. The charges related to these payments were included in the line item other income (loss) — net in our consolidated statements of income during the years ended December 31, 2018, December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016.
On April 1, 2017, the Company refranchised the Southwest operating unit of CCR, which includes Texas and parts of Oklahoma, New Mexico and Arkansas, in the Southwest Transaction. In conjunction with the Southwest Transaction, Arca contributed its existing beverage business to AC Bebidas. CCR contributed its Southwest operating unit, including all of its assets and liabilities, to AC Bebidas in exchange for an approximate 20 percent interest in AC Bebidas. Arca owns the remaining interest in AC Bebidas. CCR also made cash payments of $144 million, net of cash received. As a result of the Southwest Transaction, the Company recognized a gain of $1,037 million due to the difference in the recorded carrying value of CCBA’s property, plant and equipment and definite-lived intangible assets by an additional $34 million and $126 million, respectively, to reflect additional depreciation and amortization that would have been recognized during the net assets transferred compared to the value of the interest it obtained in AC Bebidas of $2,960 million, whichperiod CCBA was determined using an income and market approach (a Level 3 measurement).held for sale. This gainadjustment was recorded in the line item other income (loss) — net in our consolidated statement of income. The Company accounts for its interest in AC Bebidas as an equity method investment based on our equity ownership percentage, our representation on AC Bebidas' Board of Directors, material intercompany transactions and other governance rights.

Refer to Note 20 for the impact these items had on our operating segments and Corporate.




Refranchising of China Bottling Operations
In 2017, the Company sold its bottling operations in China to the two existing local franchise bottlers, one of which is an equity method investee, and sold a related cost method investment to one of the franchise bottlers. We received net cash proceeds of $963 million as a result of these sales and recognized a gain of $88 million during the year ended December 31, 2017, which was included in the line item other income (loss) — net in our consolidated statement of income.
Coca-Cola European Partners
In May 2016, the Company merged our German bottling operations with Coca-Cola Enterprises, Inc. ("CCE") and Coca-Cola Iberian Partners, S.A.U., formerly known as Coca-Cola Iberian Partners, S.A. ("CCIP"), to create Coca-Cola European Partners plc ("CCEP"). In exchange for our German bottling operations, we received an 18 percent interest in CCEP. As a result of recording our interest in CCEP at fair value based on its quoted market price (a Level 1 measurement), the deconsolidation of our German bottling operations, and the related reversal of its cumulative translation adjustments, we recognized a gain of $1,400 million. This gain was partially offset by a $77 million charge incurred as a result of reclassifying losses related to our net investment hedges of our German bottling operations from AOCI into earnings as well as transaction costs incurred resulting in a net gain of $1,287 million during the year ended December 31, 2016. Refer to Note 16. With the exception of the transaction costs, the net gain was recorded in the line item other income (loss) — net in our consolidated statement of income. The Company accounts for its interest in CCEP as an equity method investment based on our equity ownership percentage, our representation on CCEP's Board of Directors, material intercompany transactions and other governance rights.
Coca-Cola Beverages Africa Proprietary Limited
In July 2016, the Company, SABMiller plc and Gutsche Family Investments combined the bottling operations of each of the parties' nonalcoholic ready-to-drink beverage businesses in Southern and East Africa to form a new bottler, which is called CCBA. The Company: (1) contributed its South African bottling operations to CCBA, which included certain wholly owned subsidiaries and an equity method investment; (2) paid $150 million in cash; (3) obtained a 12 percent interest in CCBA and a 3 percent interest in CCBA's South African subsidiary; and (4) acquired several trademarks that are generally indefinite-lived.
As a result of recording our interests in CCBA and its South African subsidiary at fair value, the deconsolidation of our South African bottling operations, the derecognition of the equity method investment, and the reversal of related cumulative translation adjustments, we recognized a charge of $21 million. The fair values of the equity investments in CCBA and CCBA's South African subsidiary, along with the acquired trademarks, were determined using income approaches, including discounted cash flow models (a Level 3 measurement), and the Company believes the inputs and assumptions used are consistent with those hypothetical marketplace participants would use. The loss recognized resulted primarily from the reversal of the related cumulative translation adjustments. This loss was recorded in the line item other income (loss) — net in our consolidated statement of income during the year ended December 31, 2016.
Based on the level of equity ownership, the Company's representation on CCBA's Board of Directors (two of its ten members) and other governance rights, the Company accounted for its interests in CCBA and CCBA's South African subsidiary as equity method investments. The Company's interest in CCBA provided it with a call option to acquire the ownership interest of SABMiller plc at fair value upon the occurrence of certain events, including upon a change in control of SABMiller plc.
In October 2016, ABI acquired SABMiller plc, including its 54.5 percent controlling interest in CCBA, and as a result, we exercised our call option. In October 2017, the Company and ABI completed the transition of ABI's controlling interest in CCBA to the Company for $3,150 million. We plan to hold our controlling interest in CCBA temporarily. Accordingly, we have presented the financial position and results of operations of CCBA as discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated financial statements from its date of acquisition. Refer to the "Discontinued Operations" section within this note below for further discussion.
Keurig Green Mountain, Inc.
In March 2016, a JAB Holding Company-led investor group acquired Keurig Green Mountain, Inc. ("Keurig"). As a result, the Company received proceeds of $2,380 million, which were recorded in the line item proceeds from disposals of investments in our consolidated statement of cash flows, and recorded a gain of $18 million related to the disposal of our shares of Keurig in the line item other income (loss) — net in our consolidated statement of income during the year ended December 31, 2016.
Assets and Liabilities Held for Sale
As of December 31, 2017,2021, the Company had certain bottling operations in North America and Latin AmericaAsia Pacific that met the criteria to be classified as held for sale, which requires us to present the related assets and liabilities as separate line items in our consolidated balance sheet.sale. As these bottling territories met the criteria to be classified as held for sale,a result, we were required to record their assets and liabilities at the lower of carrying value or fair value less any costs to sell. As the fair value less any costs to sell based onexceeded the agreed-upon sale


price and presentcarrying value, the related assets and liabilities as separate line itemswere recorded at their carrying value. These assets and liabilities were included in our consolidated balance sheet. Thesethe Bottling Investments operating segment. The Company expects these bottling operations wereto be refranchised in 2018.during 2022.
73





The following table presents information related to the major classes of assets and liabilities that were classified as held for sale
and were included in the line items prepaid expenses and other current assets and accounts payable and accrued expenses, respectively, in our consolidated balance sheet (in millions):
 December 31, 2017
 
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments$13
 
Trade accounts receivable, less allowances10
 
Inventories11
 
Prepaid expenses and other assets12
 
Other assets7
 
Property, plant and equipment — net85
 
Bottlers' franchise rights with indefinite lives5
 
Goodwill103
 
Other intangible assets1
 
Allowance for reduction of assets held for sale(28) 
Assets held for sale$219
1 
Accounts payable and accrued expenses$22
 
Other liabilities12
 
Deferred income taxes3
 
Liabilities held for sale$37
2 
1
Consists of total assets relating to North America refranchising of $9 millionDecember 31, 2021
Cash, cash equivalents and Latin America bottling operations of $210 million, which are included in the Bottling Investments operating segment.short-term investments
$228 
2
Trade accounts receivable, less allowances
Consists of total21 
Inventories55 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets36 
Other noncurrent assets
Deferred income tax assets
Property, plant and equipment — net282 
Goodwill37 
  Assets held for sale$674 
Accounts payable and accrued expenses$139 
Accrued income taxes
Other noncurrent liabilities relating to North America refranchising of $5 million and Latin America bottling operations of $32 million, which are included in the Bottling Investments operating segment.
Deferred income tax liabilities
  Liabilities held for sale$157 
We determined that the operations included in the table above did not meet the criteria to be classified as discontinued operations under the applicable guidance.
Discontinued Operations
In October 2017, the Company and ABI completed the transition of ABI's controlling interest in CCBA to the Company for $3,150 million. We plan to hold a controlling interest in CCBA temporarily. We anticipate that we will divest a portion of our ownership interest in 2019, which will result in the Company no longer having a controlling interest in CCBA. Accordingly, we have presented the financial position and results of operations of CCBA as discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. As CCBA met the criteria to be classified as held for sale, we were required to record their assets and liabilities at the lower of carrying value or fair value less any costs to sell and present the related assets and liabilities as separate line items in our consolidated balance sheet. During the year ended December 31, 2018, we recorded an impairment charge of $554 million, reflecting management's view of the proceeds that are expected to be received based on revised projections of future operating results and foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. Refer to Note 17.
Upon consolidation of CCBA, we remeasured our previously held equity interests in CCBA and its South African subsidiary to fair value and recorded a gain on the remeasurement of $150 million. The fair values in our previously held equity investments in CCBA and its South African subsidiary were determined using income approaches, including discounted cash flow models (a Level 3 measurement), and the Company believes the inputs and assumptions used are consistent with those hypothetical marketplace participants would use. We recorded $1,805 million for the noncontrolling interests of CCBA. The fair value of the noncontrolling interests was determined in a manner similar to our previously held equity investments.
The preliminary goodwill recorded at the time of the transaction was $4,262 million, none of which is tax deductible. This goodwill is in part due to the significant synergies that are expected from the consolidation of the bottling system in Southern and East Africa, especially within the country of South Africa. As a result, upon finalization of purchase accounting $411 million of the final goodwill balance of $4,186 million was allocated to other reporting units expected to benefit from this transaction.
During 2018, the Company acquired additional bottling operations in Zambia and Botswana, which have also been included in assets held for sale — discontinued operations and liabilities held for sale — discontinued operations.




The following table presents information related to the major classes of assets and liabilities of CCBA that were classified as held for sale — discontinued operations in our consolidated balance sheets (in millions):
 December 31, 2018
December 31, 2017
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments$151
$97
Trade accounts receivable, less allowances289
299
Inventories305
299
Prepaid expenses and other assets97
52
Equity method investments5
7
Other assets15
29
Property, plant and equipment — net1,587
1,436
Goodwill3,847
4,248
Other intangible assets796
862
Allowance for reduction of assets held for sale(546)
Assets held for sale — discontinued operations$6,546
$7,329
Accounts payable and accrued expenses$602
$598
Loans and notes payable641
404
Current maturities of long-term debt6
6
Accrued income taxes32
40
Long-term debt12
19
Other liabilities8
10
Deferred income taxes421
419
Liabilities held for sale — discontinued operations$1,722
$1,496
NOTE 3: REVENUE RECOGNITION
Our Company markets, manufactures and sells:
beverage concentrates, sometimes referred to as "beverage“beverage bases," and syrups, including fountain syrups (we refer to this part of our business as our "concentrate business" or "concentrate operations"“concentrate operations”); and
finished sparkling soft drinks and other nonalcoholic beverages (we refer to this part of our business as our "finished“finished product business" or "finished product operations"operations”).
Generally, finished product operations generate higher net operating revenues but lower gross profit margins than concentrate operations.
In our domestic and internationalOur concentrate operations we typically generate net operating revenues by selling concentrates, syrups and certain finished beverages to authorized bottling operations (to which we typically refer as our "bottlers"“bottlers” or our "bottling partners"“bottling partners”). Our bottling partners either combine the concentrates with still or sparkling water and sweeteners (depending on the product), still water and/or sparkling water, or combine the syrups with still or sparkling water, to produce finished beverages. The finished beverages are packaged in authorized containers, such as cans and refillable and nonrefillable glass and plastic bottles, bearing our trademarks or trademarks licensed to us and are then sold to retailers directly or, in some cases, through wholesalers or other bottlers. In addition, outside the United States, our bottling partners are typically authorized to manufacture fountain syrups, using our concentrate,concentrates, which they sell to fountain retailers for use in producing beverages for immediate consumption, or to authorized fountain wholesalers who in turn sell and distribute the fountain syrups to fountain retailers. Our concentrate operations are included in our geographic operating segments.  segments and our Global Ventures operating segment.
Our finished product operations generate net operating revenues by selling sparkling soft drinks and a variety of other finished nonalcoholic beverages such as water, enhanced water and sports drinks; juice, dairy and plant-based beverages; tea and coffee; and energy drinks, to retailers, or to distributors and wholesalers who distribute themin turn sell the beverages to retailers. These operations consist primarily of Company-owned or -controlledour consolidated bottling sales and distribution operations, which are included in our Bottling Investments operating segment. In certain markets, the Company also operates non-bottling finished product operations in which we sell finished beverages to distributors and wholesalers that are generally not one of the Company'sCompany’s bottling partners. These operations are generally included in one of our geographic operating segments.segments or our Global Ventures operating segment. Additionally, we sell directly to consumers through retail stores operated by Costa. These sales are included in our Global Ventures operating segment. In the United States, we

manufacture fountain syrups and sell them to fountain retailers, who use the fountain syrups to produce beverages for immediate consumption, or to authorized fountain wholesalers or bottling partners who resellin turn sell the fountain syrups to fountain retailers. These fountain syrup sales are included in our North America operating segment. Generally, finished product operations produce higher net operating revenues but lower gross profit margins compared to concentrate operations.
We adopted ASC 606 effective January 1, 2018, using the modified retrospective method. We have applied this standard to all contracts at the effective date and contracts entered into thereafter.
74


Revenue is recognized when performance obligations under the terms of the contracts with our customers are satisfied. Our performance obligation generally consists of the promise to sell concentrates, syrups or finished products to our bottling partners, wholesalers, distributors or retailers. Control of the concentrates, syrups or finished products is transferred upon shipment to, or receipt at, our customers'customers’ locations, as determined by the specific terms of the contract. OnceUpon transfer of control is transferred to the customer, we have completedwhich completes our performance obligation, and revenue is recognized. Our sales terms generally do not allow for a right of return except for matters related to any manufacturing defects on our part. After completion of our performance obligation, we have an unconditional right to consideration as outlined in the contract. Our receivables will generally be collected in less than six months, in accordance with the underlying payment terms. All of our performance obligations under the terms of contracts with our customers have an original duration of one year or less.
Our customers and bottling partners may be entitled to cash discounts, funds for promotional and marketing activities, volume-based incentive programs, support for infrastructure programs and other similar programs. In somemost markets, in an effort to allow our Company and our bottling partners to grow together through shared value, aligned financial objectives and the flexibility necessary to meet consumers'consumers’ always changing needs and tastes, we worked with our bottling partners to develop and implementhave implemented an incidence-based concentrate pricing model. Under this model, the concentrate price we charge bottlers for concentrates they use to prepare and package finished products is impacted by a number of factors, including, but not limited to, bottler pricing,the prices charged by the bottlers for such finished products, the channels in which the finished products produced from the concentratethey are sold, and package mix. The amounts associated with the arrangements described above are defined asrepresent variable consideration, under ASC 606 and an estimate of which is included in the transaction price as a component of net operating revenues in our consolidated statement of income upon completion of our performance obligations. The total revenue recorded, including any variable consideration, cannot exceed the amount for which it is probable that a significant reversal will not occur when uncertainties related to variability are resolved. As a result, we are recognizing revenue based on our faithful depiction of the consideration that we expect to receive. In making our estimates of variable consideration, we consider past results and make significant assumptions related to: (1) customer sales volumes; (2) customer ending inventories; (3) customer selling price per unit; (4) selling channels; and (5) discount rates, rebates and other pricing allowances, as applicable. In gathering data to estimate our variable consideration, we generally calculate our estimates using a portfolio approach at the country and product line level rather than at the individual contract level. The result of making these estimates will impact the line items trade accounts receivable and accounts payable and accrued expenses in our consolidated balance sheet. The actual amounts ultimately paid and/or received may be different from our estimates. The change in the amount of variable consideration recognized during the year ended December 31, 20182021 related to performance obligations satisfied in prior periods was immaterial.
In addition to changes in the timing of when we record variable consideration, ASC 606 provided clarification about the classification of certain costs relating to revenue arrangements with customers. As a result, during the year ended December 31, 2018, we recorded certain amounts in cost of goods sold or selling, general and administrative expenses that were previously classified as reductions in net operating revenues. The Company also re-evaluated the principal versus agent considerations pertaining to certain of its arrangements with third-party manufacturers and co-packers. We recorded certain costs in net operating revenues which were previously recorded in cost of goods sold related to arrangements in which we concluded we did not control the goods before they were delivered to our customers.
Prior to the adoption of ASC 606, we recognized revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement existed, delivery of products had occurred, the sales price was fixed or determinable and collectibility was reasonably assured. For our Company, this generally meant that we recognized revenue when title to our products was transferred to our bottling partners, resellers or other customers. Title usually transferred upon shipment to or receipt at our customers' locations, as determined by the specific sales terms of each transaction. Our sales terms did not allow for a right of return except for matters related to any manufacturing defects on our part. Our customers could earn certain incentives which were included in deductions from revenue, a component of net operating revenues in our consolidated statement of income. These incentives included, but were not limited to, cash discounts, funds for promotional and marketing activities, volume-based incentive programs and support for infrastructure programs. In preparing the financial statements, management made estimates related to the contractual terms, customer performance and sales volume to determine the total amounts recorded as deductions from revenue. Management also considered past results in making such estimates. The actual amounts ultimately paid may have been different from our estimates. Such differences were recorded once they were determined and historically were not significant.



The following tables compare the amounts reported in the consolidated statement of income and consolidated balance sheet to the amounts had the previous revenue recognition guidance been in effect (in millions):
 Year Ended December 31, 2018 
 As Reported
Balances without Adoption of ASC 606
Increase (Decrease) Due to Adoption
 
Net operating revenues$31,856
$31,191
$665
1 
Cost of goods sold11,770
10,930
840
1 
Gross profit20,086
20,261
(175) 
Selling, general and administrative expenses10,307
10,488
(181) 
Operating income8,700
8,694
6
 
Income from continuing operations before income taxes8,350
8,344
6
 
Income taxes from continuing operations1,623
1,626
3
 
Net income from continuing operations6,727
6,718
9
 
Income (loss) from discontinued operations(251)(253)2
 
Consolidated net income6,476
6,465
11
 
Net income attributable to shareowners of The Coca-Cola Company6,434
6,423
11
 
1 The increase was primarily due to the reclassification of shipping and handling costs.

 December 31, 2018 
 As Reported
Balances without Adoption of ASC 606
Increase (Decrease) Due to Adoption
 
ASSETS

   
Trade accounts receivable$3,396
$3,302
$94
1 
Prepaid expenses and other assets1,962
1,970
(8) 
Total current assets30,634
30,548
86
 
Deferred income tax assets2,667
2,649
18
 
Total assets83,216
83,112
104
 
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

   
Accounts payable and accrued expenses$8,932
$8,513
$419
2 
Total current liabilities29,223
28,804
419
 
Deferred income tax liabilities1,933
2,002
(69) 
Reinvested earnings63,234
63,480
(246) 
Total equity19,058
19,304
(246) 
Total liabilities and equity83,216
83,112
104
 
1 The increase was primarily due to incremental estimated variable consideration receivables from third-party customers.
2 The increase was primarily due to incremental estimated variable consideration payables due to third-party customers.


The following table presents net operating revenues disaggregated between the United States and International and further by line of business (in millions):
United StatesInternationalTotal
United States
International
Total
Year Ended December 31, 2018 
Year Ended December 31, 2021Year Ended December 31, 2021
Concentrate operations$4,571
$15,886
$20,457
Concentrate operations$6,551 $15,248 $21,799 
Finished product operations6,773
4,626
11,399
Finished product operations6,459 10,397 16,856 
Total$11,344
$20,512
$31,856
Total$13,010 $25,645 $38,655 
Year Ended December 31, 2020Year Ended December 31, 2020
Concentrate operationsConcentrate operations$5,443 $13,139 $18,582 
Finished product operationsFinished product operations5,838 8,594 14,432 
TotalTotal$11,281 $21,733 $33,014 
Year Ended December 31, 2019Year Ended December 31, 2019
Concentrate operationsConcentrate operations$5,252 $15,247 $20,499 
Finished product operationsFinished product operations6,463 10,304 16,767 
TotalTotal$11,715 $25,551 $37,266 
Refer to Note 2019 for additional revenue disclosures by operating segment and Corporate.
NOTE 4: INVESTMENTS
Equity Securities
Effective January 1, 2018, we adopted ASU 2016-01, which requires us toWe measure all equity investments that do not result in consolidation and are not accounted for under the equity method at fair value and recognize any changeswith the change in earnings.fair value included in net income. We use quoted market prices to determine the fair valuevalues of equity securities with readily determinable fair values. For equity securities without readily determinable fair values, we have elected the measurement alternative under which we measure these investments at cost minus impairment, if any, plus or minus
75


changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions for the identical or a similar investment of the same issuer. Management assesses each of these investments on an individual basis. We recognized a cumulative effect adjustment of $409 million, net of tax, to increase the opening balance of reinvested earnings with an offset to AOCI as of January 1, 2018 in connection with the adoption of ASU 2016-01.
Prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-01, marketable equity securities not accounted for under the equity method were classified as either trading or available-for-sale. Both realized and unrealized gains and losses on equity securities classified as trading securities were recognized in net income. For equity securities classified as available-for-sale, realized gains and losses were included in net income. Unrealized gains and losses on equity securities classified as available-for-sale were recognized in AOCI, net of tax. Equity securities without readily determinable fair values were recorded at cost.
Our investments in debt securities are carried at either amortized cost or fair value. The cost basis is determined by the specific identification method. Investments in debt securities that the Company has the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity are carried at amortized cost and classified as held-to-maturity. The cost basis is determined by the specific identification method. Investments in debt securities that are not classified as held-to-maturity are carried at fair value and classified as either trading or available-for-sale. Realized and unrealized gains and losses on trading debt securities as well as realized gains and losses on available-for-sale debt securities are included in net income. Unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, on available-for-sale debt securities are included in our consolidated balance sheet as a component of AOCI, except for the changechanges in fair valuevalues attributable to the currency risk being hedged, if applicable, which isare included in net income. Refer to Note 65 for additional information related to the Company'sCompany’s fair value hedges of available-for-sale debt securities.
Equity securities with readily determinable fair values that are not accounted for under the equity method and debt securities classified as trading are not assessed for impairment, since they are carried at fair value with the change in fair value included in net income. Similarly, prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-01, equity investments classified as trading were not tested for impairment. Equity method investments, equity securities without readily determinable fair values and debt securities classified as available-for-sale or held-to-maturity are and prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-01, equity securities classified as available-for-sale and cost method investments were, reviewed each reporting period to determine whether a significant event or change in circumstances has occurred that may have an adverse effect on the fair value of each investment. When such events or changes occur, we evaluate the fair value compared to our cost basis in the investment. We also perform this evaluation every reporting period for each investment for which our cost basis has exceeded the fair value. The fair values of most of our Company'sCompany’s investments in publicly traded companies are often readily available based on quoted market prices. For investments in nonpublicly traded companies, management'smanagement’s assessment of fair value is based on valuation methodologies including discounted cash flows, estimates of sales proceeds and appraisals, as appropriate. We consider the assumptions that we believe hypothetical marketplace participantsa market participant would use in evaluating estimated future cash flows when employing the discounted cash flow or estimates of sales proceeds valuation methodologies. The ability to accurately predict future cash flows, especially in emerging and developing markets, may impact the determination of fair value. In the event the fair value of an investment declines below our cost basis, management is required to determine if the decline in fair value is other than temporary. If management determines the decline is other than temporary, an impairment charge is recorded. Management'sManagement’s assessment as to the nature of a decline in fair value is based on, among other things, the length of time and the extent to which the market value has been less than our cost basis; the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer; and our intent and ability to retain the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in market value.

Equity Securities

As of December 31, 2018, theThe carrying values of our equity securities were included in the following line items in our consolidated balance sheetsheets (in millions):
Fair Value with Changes Recognized in IncomeMeasurement Alternative —
No Readily Determinable
Fair Value
December 31, 2021
Marketable securities$376 $ 
Other investments771 47 
Other noncurrent assets1,576  
Total equity securities$2,723 $47 
December 31, 2020
Marketable securities$330 $— 
Other investments762 50 
Other noncurrent assets1,282 — 
Total equity securities$2,374 $50 
76

 Fair Value with Changes Recognized in Income
Measurement Alternative  No Readily Determinable Fair Value

Marketable securities$278
$
Other investments787
80
Other assets869

Total equity securities$1,934
$80

The calculation of net unrealized gains and losses recognized during the year related to equity securities still held at December 31, 2018the end of the year is as follows (in millions):
 Year Ended December 31, 2018
Net gains (losses) recognized during the year related to equity securities$(250)
Less: Net gains (losses) recognized during the year related to equity securities sold during the year8
Net unrealized gains (losses) recognized during the year related to equity securities still held at the end of
   the year
$(258)
As of December 31, 2017, our equity securities consisted of the following (in millions):
  Gross Unrealized Estimated
 Cost
Gains
Losses
 Fair Value
Trading securities$324
$75
$(4) $395
Available-for-sale securities1,276
685
(66) 1,895
Total equity securities$1,600
$760
$(70) $2,290
As of December 31, 2017, the fair values of our equity securities were included in the following line items in our consolidated balance sheet (in millions):
 Trading Securities
Available-for-Sale Securities
Marketable securities$283
$52
Other investments
953
Other assets112
890
Total equity securities$395
$1,895
The sale and/or maturity of available-for-sale equity securities resulted in the following realized activity (in millions):
 Year Ended
 December 31, 2017
Gross gains$61
Gross losses(19)
Proceeds275


Year Ended December 31,20212020
Net gains (losses) recognized during the year related to equity securities$509 $146 
Less: Net gains (losses) recognized during the year related to equity securities sold during
the year
71 (22)
Net unrealized gains (losses) recognized during the year related to equity securities still held at the end of the year$438 $168 
Debt Securities
Our debt securities consisted of the following (in millions):
Gross UnrealizedEstimated Fair Value
 Gross Unrealized Estimated
CostGainsLosses
Cost
Gains
Losses
 Fair Value
December 31, 2018   
December 31, 2021December 31, 2021
Trading securities$45
$
$(1) $44
Trading securities$39 $1 $ $40 
Available-for-sale securities4,901
119
(27) 4,993
Available-for-sale securities1,648 33 (132)1,549 
Total debt securities$4,946
$119
$(28) $5,037
Total debt securities$1,687 $34 $(132)$1,589 
December 31, 2017   
December 31, 2020December 31, 2020
Trading securities$12
$
$
 $12
Trading securities$36 $$— $38 
Available-for-sale securities5,782
157
(27) 5,912
Available-for-sale securities2,227 51 (13)2,265 
Total debt securities$5,794
$157
$(27) $5,924
Total debt securities$2,263 $53 $(13)$2,303 
The faircarrying values of our debt securities were included in the following line items in our consolidated balance sheets (in millions):
December 31, 2021December 31, 2020
Trading SecuritiesAvailable-for-Sale SecuritiesTrading SecuritiesAvailable-for-Sale Securities
Marketable securities$40 $1,283 $38 $1,980 
Other noncurrent assets 266 — 285 
Total debt securities$40 $1,549 $38 $2,265 
 December 31, 2018 December 31, 2017
 Trading Securities
Available-for-Sale Securities
 Trading Securities
Available-for-Sale Securities
Cash and cash equivalents$
$
 $
$667
Marketable securities44
4,691
 12
4,970
Other assets
302
 
275
Total debt securities$44
$4,993
 $12
$5,912
The contractual maturities of these available-for-sale debt securities as of December 31, 20182021 were as follows (in millions):
Cost
Estimated
Fair Value

CostEstimated
Fair Value
Within 1 year$685
$682
Within 1 year$28 $28 
After 1 year through 5 years3,871
3,948
After 1 year through 5 years1,355 1,241 
After 5 years through 10 years106
122
After 5 years through 10 years88 98 
After 10 years239
241
After 10 years177 182 
Total$4,901
$4,993
Total$1,648 $1,549 
The Company expects that actual maturities may differ from the contractual maturities above because borrowers have the right to call or prepay certain obligations.
The sale and/or maturity of available-for-sale debt securities resulted in the following realized activity (in millions):
Year Ended December 31,202120202019
Gross gains$6 $20 $39 
Gross losses(10)(13)(8)
Proceeds1,197 1,559 3,956 
77

Year Ended December 31,2018
2017
Gross gains$22
$7
Gross losses(27)(13)
Proceeds13,710
13,930

Captive Insurance Companies
In accordance with local insurance regulations, our consolidated captive insurance companies are required to meet and maintain minimum solvency capital requirements. The Company elected to invest a majority of its solvency capital in a portfolio of marketable equity and debt securities. These securities are included in the disclosures above. The Company uses one of itsour consolidated captive insurance companies to reinsure group annuity insurance contracts that cover the pension obligations of certain of our European and Canadian pension plans. This captive'scaptive’s solvency capital funds included total equity and debt securities of $1,056$1,670 million and $1,389 million as of December 31, 20182021 and $1,159 million as of December 31, 2017,2020, respectively, which arewere classified in the line item other noncurrent assets in our consolidated balance sheets because the assets are not available to satisfy our current obligations.




NOTE 5: INVENTORIES
Inventories consist primarily of raw materials and packaging (which include ingredients and supplies) and finished goods (which include concentrates and syrups in our concentrate operations and finished beverages in our finished product operations). Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value. We determine cost on the basis of the average cost or first-in, first-out methods. Inventories consisted of the following (in millions):
December 31,2018
 2017
Raw materials and packaging$1,862
 $1,729
Finished goods692
 693
Other212
 233
Total inventories$2,766
 $2,655
NOTE 6: 5: HEDGING TRANSACTIONS AND DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The Company is directly and indirectly affected by changes in certain market conditions. These changes in market conditions may adversely impact the Company'sCompany’s financial performance and are referred to as "market“market risks." When deemed appropriate, our Company uses derivatives as a risk management tool to mitigate the potential impact of certain market risks. The primary market risks managed by the Company through the use of derivative and non-derivative financial instruments are foreign currency exchange rate risk, commodity price risk and interest rate risk.
The Company uses various types of derivative instruments including, but not limited to, forward contracts, commodity futures contracts, option contracts, collars and swaps. Forward contracts and commodity futures contracts are agreements to buy or sell a quantity of a currency or commodity at a predetermined future date and at a predetermined rate or price. An option contract is an agreement that conveys the purchaser the right, but not the obligation, to buy or sell a quantity of a currency or commodity at a predetermined rate or price during a period or at a time in the future. A collar is a strategy that uses a combination of options to limit the range of possible positive or negative returns on an underlying asset or liability to a specific range, or to protect expected future cash flows. To do this, an investor simultaneously buys a put option and sells (writes) a call option, or alternatively buys a call option and sells (writes) a put option. A swap agreement is a contract between two parties to exchange cash flows based on specified underlying notional amounts, assets and/or indices. We do not enter into derivative financial instruments for trading purposes. The Company may also designate certain non-derivative instruments, such as our foreign-denominatedforeign currency denominated third-party debt, in hedging relationships.
All derivativesderivative instruments are carried at fair value in our consolidated balance sheets,sheet, primarily in the following line items, as applicable: prepaid expenses and other current assets; other noncurrent assets; accounts payable and accrued expenses; and other noncurrent liabilities. The carrying values of the derivatives reflect the impact of legally enforceable master netting agreements and cash collateral held or placed with the same counterparties, as applicable. These master netting agreements allow the Company to net settle positive and negative positions (assets and liabilities) arising from different transactions with the same counterparty.
The accounting for gains and losses that result from changes in the fair values of derivative instruments depends on whether the derivatives have been designated and qualify as hedging instruments and the type of hedging relationships. Derivatives can be designated as fair value hedges, cash flow hedges or hedges of net investments in foreign operations. The changes in the fair values of derivatives that have been designated and qualify for fair value hedge accounting are recorded in the same line item in our consolidated statementsstatement of income as the changes in the fair values of the hedged items attributable to the risk being hedged. The changes in the fair values of derivatives that have been designated and qualify as cash flow hedges or hedges of net investments in foreign operations are recorded in AOCI and are reclassified into the line item in our consolidated statementsstatement of income in which the hedged items are recorded in the same period the hedged items affect earnings. Due to the high degree of effectiveness between the hedging instruments and the underlying exposures being hedged, fluctuations in the values of the derivative instruments are generally offset by changes in the fair values or cash flows of the underlying exposures being hedged. The changes in the fair values of derivatives that were not designated and/or did not qualify as hedging instruments are immediately recognized intoin earnings.
78


For derivatives that will be accounted for as hedging instruments, the Company formally designates and documents, at inception, the financial instrument as a hedge of a specific underlying exposure, the risk management objective and the strategy for undertaking the hedge transaction. In addition, the Company formally assesses, both at the inception and at least quarterly thereafter, whether the financial instruments used in hedging transactions are effective at offsetting changes in either the fair values or cash flows of the related underlying exposures. Any ineffective portion of a financial instrument's change in fair value is immediately recognized into earnings.
The Company determines the fair values of its derivatives based on quoted market prices or pricing models using current market rates. Refer to Note 17.16. The notional amounts of the derivative financial instruments do not necessarily represent


amounts exchanged by the parties and, therefore, are not a direct measure of our exposure to the financial risks described above. The amounts exchanged are calculated by reference to the notional amounts and by other terms of the derivatives, such as interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, commodity rates or other financial indices. The Company does not view the fair values of its derivatives in isolation but rather in relation to the fair values or cash flows of the underlying hedged transactions or other exposures. Virtually all of our derivatives are straightforward over-the-counter instruments with liquid markets.
We adopted ASU 2017-12, Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities, effective January 1, 2019 using the modified retrospective method. For highly effective cash flow hedges, this ASU requires the entire change in fair value of the hedging instrument included in the assessment of hedge effectiveness to be recorded in other comprehensive income (“OCI”). No components of the Company’s hedging instruments were excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness. To reflect the adoption of the new hedging standard on our cash flow hedging relationships at January 1, 2019, we recorded a $6 million increase, net of taxes, to the opening balance of reinvested earnings and a corresponding decrease to AOCI. For fair value hedges of interest rate risk, this ASU allows entities to elect to use the benchmark interest rate component of the contractual coupon cash flows to calculate the change in fair value of the hedged item attributable to changes in the benchmark interest rate. As a result of applying the new hedging standard to our fair value hedges on January 1, 2019, we recorded a $24 million increase to our hedged long-term debt balances, with a corresponding decrease to the opening balance of reinvested earnings of $18 million, net of taxes.
The following table presents the fair values of the Company'sCompany’s derivative instruments that were designated and qualified as part of a hedging relationship (in millions):
 
Fair Value1,2
Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments
Balance Sheet Location1
December 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
Assets:   
Foreign currency contractsPrepaid expenses and other current assets$151 $26 
Foreign currency contractsOther noncurrent assets27 74 
Commodity contractsPrepaid expenses and other current assets 
Interest rate contractsPrepaid expenses and other current assets1 — 
Interest rate contractsOther noncurrent assets282 659 
Total assets $461 $761 
Liabilities:   
Foreign currency contractsAccounts payable and accrued expenses$15 $29 
Foreign currency contractsOther noncurrent liabilities17 — 
Interest rate contractsAccounts payable and accrued expenses 
Interest rate contractsOther noncurrent liabilities14 — 
Total liabilities $46 $34 
1All of the Company’s derivative instruments are carried at fair value in our consolidated balance sheets after considering the impact of legally enforceable master netting agreements and cash collateral held or placed with the same counterparties, as applicable. Current disclosure requirements mandate that derivatives must also be disclosed without reflecting the impact of master netting agreements and cash collateral. Refer to Note 16 for the net presentation of the Company’s derivative instruments.
2Refer to Note 16 for additional information related to the estimated fair value.
79

   
Fair Value1,2
Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments
Balance Sheet Location1
 December 31,
2018

 December 31,
2017

Assets:     
Foreign currency contractsPrepaid expenses and other assets $43
 $45
Foreign currency contractsOther assets 114
 79
Interest rate contractsOther assets 88
 52
Total assets  $245
 $176
Liabilities:     
Foreign currency contractsAccounts payable and accrued expenses $19
 $69
Foreign currency contractsOther liabilities 15
 9
Foreign currency contractsLiabilities held for sale — discontinued operations 
 8
Commodity contractsAccounts payable and accrued expenses 1
 
Commodity contractsLiabilities held for sale — discontinued operations 
 4
Interest rate contractsAccounts payable and accrued expenses 
 30
Interest rate contractsOther liabilities 40
 39
Total liabilities  $75
 $159

1
All of the Company's derivative instruments are carried at fair value in our consolidated balance sheets after considering the impact of legally enforceable master netting agreements and cash collateral held or placed with the same counterparties, as applicable. Current disclosure requirements mandate that derivatives must also be disclosed without reflecting the impact of master netting agreements and cash collateral. Refer to Note 17 for the net presentation of the Company's derivative instruments.
2
Refer to Note 17 for additional information related to the estimated fair value.


The following table presents the fair values of the Company'sCompany’s derivative instruments that were not designated as hedging instruments (in millions):
 
Fair Value1,2
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
Balance Sheet Location1
December 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
Assets:   
Foreign currency contractsPrepaid expenses and other current assets$53 $28 
Foreign currency contractsOther noncurrent assets 
Commodity contractsPrepaid expenses and other current assets131 76 
Commodity contractsOther noncurrent assets3 
Other derivative instrumentsPrepaid expenses and other current assets9 20 
Other derivative instrumentsOther noncurrent assets 
Total assets $196 $137 
Liabilities:   
Foreign currency contractsAccounts payable and accrued expenses$34 $41 
Foreign currency contractsOther noncurrent liabilities9 — 
Commodity contractsAccounts payable and accrued expenses6 15 
Commodity contractsOther noncurrent liabilities1 
Total liabilities $50 $57 
   
Fair Value1,2
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
Balance Sheet Location1
 December 31,
2018

 December 31,
2017

Assets:     
Foreign currency contractsPrepaid expenses and other assets $61
 $20
Foreign currency contractsOther assets 
 27
Commodity contractsPrepaid expenses and other assets 2
 25
Commodity contractsOther assets 
 1
Other derivative instrumentsPrepaid expenses and other assets 7
 8
Total assets  $70
 $81
Liabilities:     
Foreign currency contractsAccounts payable and accrued expenses $99
 $69
Foreign currency contractsOther liabilities 
 28
Foreign currency contractsLiabilities held for sale — discontinued operations 2
 
Commodity contractsAccounts payable and accrued expenses 37
 7
Commodity contractsOther liabilities 8
 
Commodity contractsLiabilities held for sale — discontinued operations 1
 
Other derivative instrumentsAccounts payable and accrued expenses 13
 1
Other derivative instrumentsOther liabilities 
 1
Total liabilities  $160
 $106
1All of the Company’s derivative instruments are carried at fair value in our consolidated balance sheets after considering the impact of legally enforceable master netting agreements and cash collateral held or placed with the same counterparties, as applicable. Current disclosure requirements mandate that derivatives must also be disclosed without reflecting the impact of master netting agreements and cash collateral. Refer to Note 16 for the net presentation of the Company’s derivative instruments.
1
2Refer to Note 16 for additional information related to the estimated fair value.
All of the Company's derivative instruments are carried at fair value in our consolidated balance sheets after considering the impact of legally enforceable master netting agreements and cash collateral held or placed with the same counterparties, as applicable. Current disclosure requirements mandate that derivatives must also be disclosed without reflecting the impact of master netting agreements and cash collateral. Refer to Note 17 for the net presentation of the Company's derivative instruments.
2
Refer to Note 17 for additional information related to the estimated fair value.
Credit Risk Associated with Derivatives
We have established strict counterparty credit guidelines and enter into transactions only with financial institutions of investment grade or better. We monitor counterparty exposures regularly and review any downgrade in credit rating immediately. If a downgrade in the credit rating of a counterparty were to occur, we have provisions requiring collateral for substantially all of our transactions. To mitigate presettlement risk, minimum credit standards become more stringent as the duration of the derivative financial instrument increases. In addition, the Company'sCompany’s master netting agreements reduce credit risk by permitting the Company to net settle for transactions with the same counterparty. To minimize the concentration of credit risk, we enter into derivative transactions with a portfolio of financial institutions. Based on these factors, we consider the risk of counterparty default to be minimal.
Cash Flow Hedging Strategy
The Company uses cash flow hedges to minimize the variability in cash flows of assets or liabilities or forecasted transactions caused by fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, commodity prices or interest rates. The changes in the fair values of derivatives designated as cash flow hedges are recorded in AOCI and are reclassified into the line item in our consolidated statementsstatement of income in which the hedged items are recorded in the same period the hedged items affect earnings. The changes in fair values of hedges that are determined to be ineffective are immediately reclassified from AOCI into earnings. The maximum length of time for which the Company hedges its exposure to the variability in future cash flows is typically three years.years.
The Company maintains a foreign currency cash flow hedging program to reduce the risk that our eventual U.S. dollar net cash inflows from sales outside the United States and U.S. dollar net cash outflows from procurement activities will be adversely affected by changesfluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. We enter into forward contracts and purchase foreign currency options and collars (principally euroseuro, British pound sterling and Japanese yen) and collars to hedge certain portions of forecasted cash flows denominated in foreign currencies. When the U.S. dollar strengthens against the foreign currencies, the decline in the present value of future foreign currency cash flows is partially offset by gains in the fair value of the derivative instruments. Conversely, when the U.S. dollar weakens, the increase in the present value of future foreign currency cash flows is partially offset by losses in the fair value of the derivative instruments. The total notional values of derivatives that have beenwere designated and qualifyqualified for the Company's


Company’s foreign currency cash flow hedging program were $3,175$7,399 million and $4,068$7,785 million as of December 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, respectively.
80


The Company uses cross-currency swaps to hedge the changes in cash flows of certain of its foreign currency denominated debt and other monetary assets or liabilities due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. For this hedging program, the Company recordsrecognizes in earnings each period the changechanges in carrying valuevalues of these foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities due to changesfluctuations in exchange rates into earnings each period.rates. The changes in fair valuevalues of the cross-currency swap derivatives are recorded in AOCI with an immediate reclassification into earnings for the changechanges in fair valuevalues attributable to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. The total notional values of derivatives that have beenwere designated as cash flow hedges for the Company'sCompany’s foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities were $3,028$1,994 million and $1,851$2,700 million as of December 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, respectively.
The Company has entered into commodity futures contracts and other derivative instruments on various commodities to mitigate the price risk associated with forecasted purchases of materials used in our manufacturing process. These derivative instruments have beenwere designated and qualify as part of the Company'sCompany’s commodity cash flow hedging program. The objective of this hedging program is to reduce the variability of cash flows associated with future purchases of certain commodities. The total notional valuevalues of derivatives that have beenwere designated and qualifyqualified for this program were $9$10 million and $35$11 million as of December 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, respectively.
Our Company monitors our mix of short-term debt and long-term debt regularly. From time to time, we manage our risk to interest rate fluctuations through the use of derivative financial instruments. The Company has entered into interest rate swap agreements and has designated these instruments as part of the Company'sCompany’s interest rate cash flow hedging program. The objective of this hedging program is to mitigate the risk of adverse changes in benchmark interest rates on the Company'sCompany’s future interest payments. The total notional valuesvalue of these interest rate swap agreements that waswere designated and qualified for the Company'sCompany’s interest rate cash flow hedging program was $500$1,233 million as of December 31, 2017. During the year ended December 31, 2018, we discontinued the cash flow hedge relationship related to these swaps. We reclassified a loss of $8 million into earnings as a result of the discontinuance.2020. As of December 31, 2018,2021, we did not have any interest rate swaps designated as a cash flow hedge.


The following table presents the pretax impact that changes in the fair values of derivatives designated as cash flow hedges had on OCI, AOCI and earnings (in millions):
Gain (Loss)
Recognized
in OCI
Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in IncomeGain (Loss)
Reclassified from
AOCI into Income
2021   
Foreign currency contracts$36 Net operating revenues$(77)
Foreign currency contracts(2)Cost of goods sold(10)
Foreign currency contracts Interest expense(13)
Foreign currency contracts19 Other income (loss) — net74 
Interest rate contracts110 Interest expense(90)
Commodity contracts(1)Cost of goods sold 
Total$162 $(116)
2020
Foreign currency contracts$(93)Net operating revenues$(73)
Foreign currency contractsCost of goods sold
Foreign currency contracts— Interest expense(16)
Foreign currency contracts37 Other income (loss) — net60 
Interest rate contracts15 Interest expense(54)
Commodity contractsCost of goods sold— 
Total$(35) $(74)
2019
Foreign currency contracts$(58)Net operating revenues$(3)
Foreign currency contractsCost of goods sold11 
Foreign currency contracts— Interest expense(9)
Foreign currency contracts(97)Other income (loss) — net(119)
Interest rate contracts(47)Interest expense(42)
Commodity contractsCost of goods sold— 
Total$(200)$(162)
81


 
Gain (Loss)
Recognized
in OCI

 
Location of Gain (Loss)
Recognized in Income1
 
Gain (Loss)
Reclassified from
AOCI into Income
(Effective Portion)

 
Gain (Loss)
Recognized in Income
(Ineffective Portion and
Amount Excluded from
Effectiveness Testing)

 
2018        
Foreign currency contracts$9
 Net operating revenues $136
 $1
 
Foreign currency contracts15
 Cost of goods sold 8
 
2 
Foreign currency contracts
 Interest expense (9) 
 
Foreign currency contracts23
 Other income (loss) — net (5) (4) 
Foreign currency contracts
 Income (loss) from discontinued operations 
 (3) 
Interest rate contracts22
 Interest expense (40) (8) 
Commodity contracts(1) Cost of goods sold 
 
 
Commodity contracts
 Income (loss) from discontinued operations 
 (5) 
Total$68
   $90
 $(19) 
2017        
Foreign currency contracts$(226) Net operating revenues $443
 $1
 
Foreign currency contracts(23) Cost of goods sold (2) 
2 
Foreign currency contracts
 Interest expense (9) 
 
Foreign currency contracts92
 Other income (loss) — net 107
 3
 
Foreign currency contracts(3) Income (loss) from discontinued operations 
 
 
Interest rate contracts(22) Interest expense (37) 2
 
Commodity contracts(1) Cost of goods sold (1) 
 
Commodity contracts(5) Income (loss) from discontinued operations 
 
 
Total$(188)   $501
 $6
 
2016        
Foreign currency contracts$69
 Net operating revenues $567
 $(3) 
Foreign currency contracts8
 Cost of goods sold 35
 (1) 
Foreign currency contracts
 Interest expense (9) 
 
Foreign currency contracts13
 Other income (loss) — net (3) (3) 
Interest rate contracts(126) Interest expense (17) (2) 
Commodity contracts(1) Cost of goods sold (1) 
 
Total$(37)   $572
 $(9) 
1
The Company records gains and losses reclassified from AOCI into income for the effective portion and ineffective portion, if any, to the same line items in our consolidated statements of income.
2
Includes a de minimis amount of ineffectiveness in the hedging relationship.
As of December 31, 2018,2021, the Company estimates that it will reclassify into earnings during the next 12 months net lossesgains of $29$36 million from the pretax amount recorded in AOCI as the anticipated cash flows occur.
Fair Value Hedging Strategy
The Company uses interest rate swap agreements designated as fair value hedges to minimize exposure to changes in the fair value of fixed-rate debt that resultsresult from fluctuations in benchmark interest rates. The Company also uses cross-currency interest rate swaps to hedge the changes in the fair value of foreign currency denominated debt relating to changesfluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates and benchmark interest rates. The changes in fair values of derivatives designated as fair value hedges


and the offsetting changes in fair values of the hedged items are recognized in earnings. The ineffective portions of these hedges are immediately recognized into earnings. As of December 31, 2018, such adjustments had cumulatively increased the carrying value of our long-term debt by $42 million.a result, any difference is reflected in earnings as ineffectiveness. When a derivative is no longer designated as a fair value hedge for any reason, including termination and maturity, the remaining unamortized difference between the carrying value of the hedged item at that time and the face value of the hedged item is amortized to earnings over the remaining life of the hedged item, or immediately if the hedged item has matured.matured or has been extinguished. The total notional values of derivatives related to ourthat were designated and qualified as fair value hedges of this type were $8,023$12,113 million and $8,121 million as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
The Company also uses fair value hedges to minimize exposure to changes in the fair value of certain available-for-sale securities from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. The changes in fair values of derivatives designated as fair value hedges and the offsetting changes in fair values of the hedged items due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates are recognized in earnings. As a result, any difference is reflected in earnings as ineffectiveness. The total notional value of derivatives related to fair value hedges of this type was $311$10,215 million as of December 31, 2017. As of December 31, 2018, we did not have any fair value hedges of this type.

2021 and 2020, respectively.
The following table summarizes the pretax impact that changes in the fair values of derivatives designated as fair value hedges had on earnings (in millions):
Hedging Instruments and Hedged ItemsLocation of Gain (Loss) Recognized in IncomeGain (Loss)
Recognized in Income
2021
Interest rate contractsInterest expense$(67)
Fixed-rate debtInterest expense66
Net impact to interest expense$(1)
Net impact of fair value hedging instruments$(1)
2020
Interest rate contractsInterest expense$275 
Fixed-rate debtInterest expense(274)
Net impact to interest expense$
Foreign currency contractsOther income (loss) — net$(4)
Available-for-sale securitiesOther income (loss) — net
Net impact to other income (loss) — net$
Net impact of fair value hedging instruments$
2019
Interest rate contractsInterest expense$368 
Fixed-rate debtInterest expense(369)
Net impact to interest expense$(1)
Net impact of fair value hedging instruments$(1)
Hedging Instruments and Hedged Items
Location of Gain (Loss)
Recognized in Income
Gain (Loss)
Recognized in Income1

2018  
Interest rate contractsInterest expense$34
Fixed-rate debtInterest expense(38)
Net impact to interest expense $(4)
Foreign currency contractsOther income (loss) — net$(6)
Available-for-sale securitiesOther income (loss) — net6
Net impact to other income (loss) — net $
Net impact of fair value hedging instruments $(4)
2017  
Interest rate contractsInterest expense$(69)
Fixed-rate debtInterest expense63
Net impact to interest expense $(6)
Foreign currency contractsOther income (loss) — net$(37)
Available-for-sale securitiesOther income (loss) — net44
Net impact to other income (loss) — net $7
Net impact of fair value hedging instruments $1
2016  
Interest rate contractsInterest expense$170
Fixed-rate debtInterest expense(152)
Net impact to interest expense $18
Foreign currency contractsOther income (loss) — net$69
Available-for-sale securitiesOther income (loss) — net(73)
Net impact to other income (loss) — net $(4)
Net impact of fair value hedging instruments $14
1 The net impacts represent the ineffective portions of the hedge relationships andfollowing table summarizes the amounts excluded from the assessmentrecorded in our consolidated balance sheets related to hedged items in fair value hedging relationships (in millions):
Cumulative Amount of Fair Value Hedging Adjustments1
Carrying Values of
Hedged Items
Included in the Carrying Values of Hedged ItemsRemaining for Which Hedge Accounting Has Been Discontinued
Balance Sheet Location of Hedged ItemsDecember 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
December 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
December 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
Current maturities of long-term debt$200 $— $1 $— $ $— 
Long-term debt12,353 11,129 255 646 228 — 
1 Cumulative amount of hedge effectiveness.fair value hedging adjustments does not include changes due to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations.
82


Hedges of Net Investments in Foreign Operations Strategy
The Company uses forward contracts and a portion of its foreign currency denominated debt, a non-derivative financial instrument, to protect the value of our net investments in a number of foreign operations. For derivative financial instruments that are designated and qualify as hedges of net investments in foreign operations, the changes in the fair values of the derivative


financial instruments are recognized in net foreign currency translation adjustment,adjustments, a component of AOCI, to offset the changes in the values of the net investments being hedged. For non-derivative financial instruments that are designated and qualify as hedges of net investments in foreign operations, the changechanges in the carrying valuevalues of the designated portionportions of the non-derivative financial instrumentinstruments due to changesfluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates isare recorded in net foreign currency translation adjustment.adjustments. Any ineffective portions of net investment hedges are reclassified from AOCI into earnings during the period of change.
During the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, the Company designated a portion of its euro-denominated debt as a hedge of a net investment in our European operations.
The following table summarizes the notional values and pretax impact of changes in the fair values of instruments designated as net investment hedges (in millions):
Notional AmountGain (Loss) Recognized in OCI
as of December 31,Year Ended December 31,
 20212020202120202019
Foreign currency contracts$40 $451 $(10)$(5)$51 
Foreign currency denominated debt12,812 13,336 928 (1,089)144 
Total$12,852 $13,787 $918 $(1,094)$195 
 Notional Amount Gain (Loss) Recognized in OCI
 as of December 31, Year Ended December 31,
 2018
2017
 2018
2017
2016
Foreign currency contracts$
$
 $(14)$(7)$(237)
Foreign currency denominated debt12,494
13,147
 653
(1,505)304
Total$12,494
$13,147
 $639
$(1,512)$67
The Company reclassified a loss of $4 million related to net investment hedges from AOCI into earnings during the year ended December 31, 2021. The Company did not reclassify any deferred gains or losses related to net investment hedges from AOCI tointo earnings during the years ended December 31, 20182020 and 2017. The Company reclassified net deferred losses of $77 million related to the deconsolidation of our German bottling operations from AOCI into earnings during the year ended December 31, 2016.2019. In addition, the Company did not have any ineffectiveness related to net investment hedges during the years ended December 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016.2019. The cash inflows and outflows associated with the Company'sCompany’s derivative contracts designated as net investment hedges are classified in the line item other investing activities in our consolidated statementsstatement of cash flows.
Economic (Non-Designated) Hedging Strategy
In addition to derivative instruments that are designated and qualify for hedge accounting, the Company also uses certain derivatives as economic hedges of foreign currency, interest rate and commodity exposure. Although these derivatives were not designated and/or did not qualify for hedge accounting, they are effective economic hedges. The changes in the fair valuevalues of economic hedges are immediately recognized intoin earnings.
The Company uses foreign currency economic hedges to offset the earnings impact that fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates have on certain monetary assets and liabilities denominated in nonfunctional currencies. The changes in the fair valuevalues of economic hedges used to offset those monetary assets and liabilities are immediately recognized intoin earnings in the line item other income (loss) — net in our consolidated statementsstatement of income. In addition, we use foreign currency economic hedges to minimize the variability in cash flows associated with fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, including those related to certain acquisition and divestiture activities. The changes in the fair values of economic hedges used to offset the variability in U.S. dollar net cash flows are immediately recognized intoin earnings in the line items net operating revenues, cost of goods sold or other income (loss) — net in our consolidated statementsstatement of income, as applicable. The total notional values of derivatives related to our foreign currency economic hedges were $10,939$4,258 million and $6,827$5,727 million as of December 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, respectively.
The Company uses interest rate contracts as economic hedges to minimize exposure to changes in the fair value of fixed-rate debt that result from fluctuations in benchmark interest rates. The total notional value of derivatives related to our economic hedges of this type was $200 million as of both December 31, 2021 and 2020.
The Company also uses certain derivatives as economic hedges to mitigate the price risk associated with the purchase of materials used in the manufacturing process and for vehicle fuel. The changes in the fair values of these economic hedges are immediately recognized intoin earnings in the line items net operating revenues, cost of goods sold, or selling, general and administrative expenses in our consolidated statementsstatement of income, as applicable. The total notional values of derivatives related to our economic hedges of this type were $373$908 million and $357$715 million as of December 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, respectively.







83



The following table presents the pretax impact that changes in the fair values of derivatives not designated as hedging instruments had on earnings (in millions):
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging InstrumentsLocation of Gain (Loss) Recognized in IncomeGain (Loss) Recognized in Income
Year Ended December 31,
202120202019
Foreign currency contractsNet operating revenues$6 $58 $(4)
Foreign currency contractsCost of goods sold(10)
Foreign currency contractsOther income (loss) — net(84)(13)(66)
Commodity contractsCost of goods sold171 54 (23)
Interest rate contractsInterest expense(187)— 
Other derivative instrumentsSelling, general and administrative expenses34 21 47 
Other derivative instrumentsOther income (loss) — net(3)(55)48 
Total $(73)$77 $
Derivatives Not Designated
as Hedging Instruments
Location of Gain (Loss)
Recognized in Income
 
Gain (Loss)
Recognized in Income

 Year Ended December 31,
 2018
 2017
 2016
Foreign currency contractsNet operating revenues $22
 $(30) $(45)
Foreign currency contractsCost of goods sold 9
 (1) 4
Foreign currency contractsOther income (loss) — net (264) 73
 (168)
Commodity contractsNet operating revenues 
 16
 10
Commodity contractsCost of goods sold (29) 15
 75
Commodity contractsSelling, general and administrative expenses 
 1
 6
Commodity contractsIncome (loss) from discontinued operations 4
 
 
Interest rate contractsInterest expense (1) 
 (39)
Other derivative instrumentsSelling, general and administrative expenses (18) 46
 16
Other derivative instrumentsOther income (loss) — net (22) 1
 (15)
Total  $(299) $121
 $(156)
NOTE 7: 6: EQUITY METHOD INVESTMENTS
Our consolidated net income includes our Company'sCompany’s proportionate share of the net income or loss of our equity method investees. When we record our proportionate share of net income, it increases equity income (loss) — net in our consolidated statementsstatement of income and our carrying value inof that investment. Conversely, when we record our proportionate share of a net loss, it decreases equity income (loss) — net in our consolidated statementsstatement of income and our carrying value inof that investment. The Company'sCompany’s proportionate share of the net income or loss of our equity method investees includes significant operating and nonoperating items recorded by our equity method investees. These items can have a significant impact on the amount of equity income (loss) — net in our consolidated statementsstatement of income and our carrying value inof those investments. Refer to Note 1817 for additional information related to significant operating and nonoperating items recorded by our equity method investees. The carrying values of our equity method investments are also impacted by our proportionate share of items impacting the equity investee'smethod investees’ AOCI.
We eliminate from our financial results all significant intercompany transactions to the extent of our ownership interest, including the intercompany portion of transactions with equity method investees.
The Company'sCompany’s equity method investments include, but are not limited to, our ownership interests in CCEP, Monster, Beverage Corporation ("Monster"), AC Bebidas, S. de R.L. de C.V., Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V., Coca-Cola HBC AG ("Coca-Cola Hellenic"), and Coca-Cola Bottlers Japan Holdings Inc. ("CCBJHI"(“CCBJHI”). As of December 31, 2018,2021, we owned approximately 19 percent, 19 percent, 20 percent, 28 percent, 2321 percent and 1819 percent, respectively, of these companies'companies’ outstanding shares. As of December 31, 2018,2021, our investments in our equity method investees in the aggregate exceeded our proportionate share of the net assets of these equity method investees by $9,071$7,298 million. This difference is not amortized.
A summary of financial information for our equity method investees in the aggregate is as follows (in millions):
Year Ended December 31,1
202120202019
Net operating revenues$79,934 $69,384 $75,980 
Cost of goods sold47,847 41,139 44,881 
Gross profit$32,087 $28,245 $31,099 
Operating income$9,089 $7,056 $7,748 
Consolidated net income$6,050 $4,176 $4,597 
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests91 54 63 
Net income attributable to common shareowners$5,959 $4,122 $4,534 
Company equity income (loss) — net$1,438 $978 $1,049 
Year Ended December 31,1
2018
 2017
 2016
Net operating revenues$75,462
 $73,339
 $58,054
Cost of goods sold44,914
 42,867
 34,338
Gross profit$30,548
 $30,472
 $23,716
Operating income$7,511
 $7,577
 $5,652
Consolidated net income$4,645
 $4,545
 $2,967
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests101
 120
 78
Net income attributable to common shareowners$4,544
 $4,425
 $2,889
Equity income (loss) — net$1,008
 $1,071
 $835
1 The financial information represents the results of the equity method investees during the Company'sCompany’s period of ownership.


84


December 31,2018
 2017
December 31,20212020
Current assets$23,239
 $25,023
Current assets$30,992 $29,431 
Noncurrent assets66,731
 66,578
Noncurrent assets72,064 67,900 
Total assets$89,970
 $91,601
Total assets$103,056 $97,331 
Current liabilities$18,097
 $17,890
Current liabilities$21,362 $20,033 
Noncurrent liabilities29,143
 29,986
Noncurrent liabilities37,353 33,613 
Total liabilities$47,240
 $47,876
Total liabilities$58,715 $53,646 
Equity attributable to shareowners of investees$41,550
 $41,773
Equity attributable to shareowners of investees$43,422 $42,622 
Equity attributable to noncontrolling interests1,180
 1,952
Equity attributable to noncontrolling interests919 1,063 
Total equity$42,730
 $43,725
Total equity$44,341 $43,685 
Company equity investment$19,407
 $20,856
Company equity method investmentsCompany equity method investments$17,598 $19,273 
Net sales to equity method investees, the majority of which are located outside the United States, were $14,799$14,471 million, $14,144$13,041 million and $10,495$14,832 million in 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, respectively. Total payments, primarily related to marketing, made to equity method investees were $516 million, $547 million and $897 million in 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively. The increase in net sales to equity method investees in 20172021 was primarily due to our acquisition of equity method investments in CCEP and AC Bebidas, as well asrecovery from the integration of Coca-Cola West Co., Ltd. ("CCW") and Coca-Cola East Japan Co., Ltd. ("CCEJ") to establish CCBJHI in 2017. Refer to Note 2. Total payments, primarily marketing, made to equity method investees were $1,131 million, $930 million and $946 million in 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, purchases of beverage products from equity method investees were $533$496 million, $1,298$452 million and $1,857$426 million in 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, respectively. The decreaseincrease in purchases of beverage products in 20182021 was primarily due to reducedincreased purchases of Monster products as a result of North America refranchising activities. Refer to Note 2.international expansion and category growth.
If valued atThe following table presents the December 31, 2018difference between calculated fair value, based on quoted closing prices of publicly traded shares, actively traded on stock markets, theand our Company’s carrying value of our equity methodin investments in publicly traded bottlers would have exceeded our carrying value by $6,209 million. However,companies accounted for under the equity method (in millions):
December 31, 2021Fair ValueCarrying ValueDifference
Monster Beverage Corporation$9,808 $4,323 $5,485 
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc4,919 3,578 1,341 
Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V.3,182 1,568 1,614 
Coca-Cola HBC AG2,705 1,115 1,590 
Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc.1,537 224 1,313 
Coca-Cola Bottlers Japan Holdings Inc.1
387 474 (87)
Coca-Cola İçecek A.Ş.340 123 217 
Embotelladora Andina S.A.130 98 32 
Total$23,008 $11,503 $11,505 
1The carrying value of our investment in CCBJHI exceeded theits fair value of the investment as of December 31, 20182021 by $164$87 million. Based on the length of time and the extent to which the marketfair value has been less than our cost basiscarrying value and our intent and ability to retain the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in market value, management determined that the decline in fair value was temporary in nature. Therefore, we did not record an impairment charge.charge related to the investment.
Net Receivables and Dividends from Equity Method Investees
Total net receivables due from equity method investees were $1,563$882 million and $2,053$1,025 million as of December 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, respectively. The total amount of dividends received from equity method investees was $551$823 million,, $443 $467 million and $386$628 million for the years ended December 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, respectively. The amount of consolidated reinvested earnings that represents undistributed earnings of investments accounted for under the equity method as of December 31, 20182021 was $4,546$6,143 million.
NOTE 8: PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
The following table summarizes our property, plant and equipment (in millions):
85
December 31,2018
 2017
Land$485
 $334
Buildings and improvements3,838
 3,917
Machinery, equipment and vehicle fleet11,922
 12,198
Property, plant and equipment — cost16,245
 16,449
Less accumulated depreciation8,013
 8,246
Property, plant and equipment — net$8,232
 $8,203




NOTE 9:7: INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets
The following table presents the carrying values of indefinite-lived intangible assets included in our consolidated balance sheets (in millions):
December 31,20212020
Trademarks1
$14,465 $10,395 
Goodwill19,363 17,506 
Other211 225 
Indefinite-lived intangible assets$34,039 $28,126 
December 31,2018
 2017
Trademarks$6,682
 $6,729
Bottlers' franchise rights51
 138
Goodwill10,263
 9,401
Other106
 106
Indefinite-lived intangible assets$17,102
 $16,374
1 For information related to the Company’s acquisitions, refer to Note 2.
The following table provides information related to the carrying value of our goodwill by operating segment (in millions):
Europe, Middle East & AfricaLatin
America
North
America
Asia PacificGlobal VenturesBottling
Investments
Total
2020      
Balance at beginning of year$1,294 $170 $7,943 $170 $2,806 $4,381 $16,764 
Effect of foreign currency translation40 (6)— 84 (216)(91)
Acquisitions1
— — 775 — — — 775 
Purchase accounting adjustments1,2
(26)— 74 24 (2)72 
Impairments— — — — — (14)(14)
Balance at end of year$1,308 $164 $8,792 $201 $2,892 $4,149 $17,506 
2021      
Balance at beginning of year$1,308 $164 $8,792 $201 $2,892 $4,149 $17,506 
Effect of foreign currency translation(83)(8) (6)46 (285)(336)
Acquisitions1
55 44 1,886 227 45  2,257 
Impairments     (7)(7)
Divestitures, deconsolidations
  and other3
  (13) (7)(37)(57)
Balance at end of year$1,280 $200 $10,665 $422 $2,976 $3,820 $19,363 
 Europe, Middle East & Africa
 
Latin
America

 
North
America

 Asia Pacific
 
Bottling
Investments

 Total
2017           
Balance at beginning of year$628
 $117
 $8,321
 $128
 $1,435
 $10,629
Effect of foreign currency translation75
 8
 
 (1) 5
 87
Acquisitions1

 25
 28
 
 3
 56
Adjustments related to the finalization
   of purchase accounting1

 
 
 18
 
 18
Impairment charges
 
 
 
 (390) (390)
Divestitures, deconsolidations and other1,2

 
 
 
 (999) (999)
Balance at end of year$703
 $150
 $8,349
 $145
 $54
 $9,401
2018           
Balance at beginning of year$703
 $150
 $8,349
 $145
 $54
 $9,401
Effect of foreign currency translation(58) (9) 
 (4) (2) (73)
Acquisitions1,3
12
 
 
 13
 488
 513
Adjustments related to the finalization
   of purchase accounting1,4
411
 27
 (11) 
 
 427
Divestitures, deconsolidations and other1

 
 
 
 (5) (5)
Balance at end of year$1,068
 $168
 $8,338
 $154
 $535
 $10,263
1
Refer to Note 2 for information related to the Company's acquisitions and divestitures.
2
The 2017 decrease in the Bottling Investments segment was primarily a result of North America bottling operations being refranchised. Refer to Note 2.
3
The increase in 2018 was primarily due to the acquisition of the Philippine bottling operations. Refer to Note 2.
4
The increase in 2018 was primarily due to the allocation of goodwill from CCBA to other reporting units expected to benefit from the acquisition of CCBA. Refer to Note 2.

1For information related to the Company’s acquisitions, refer to Note 2.

2Includes the allocation of goodwill from the Europe, Middle East and Africa segment to other reporting units expected to benefit from the CHI acquisition as well as purchase accounting adjustments related to fairlife. Refer to Note 2.
3The decrease in the Bottling Investments segment was a result of certain bottling operations in Asia Pacific being classified as held for sale. Refer to Note 2.
Definite-Lived Intangible Assets
The following table provides information related to definite-lived intangible assets (in millions):
December 31, 2021December 31, 2020
Gross Carrying ValueAccumulated AmortizationNet
Carrying
Value
Gross Carrying
Value
Accumulated AmortizationNet
Carrying
Value
Customer relationships$336 1$(86)$250 $195 $(61)$134 
Trademarks189 (87)102 245 (77)168 
Other273 2(51)222 332 (210)122 
Total$798 $(224)$574 $772 $(348)$424 
1Includes $150 million related to the BodyArmor acquisition. Refer to Note 2.
2Includes $102 million for BodyArmor noncompete agreements. Refer to Note 2.
86

 December 31, 2018 December 31, 2017
 Gross Carrying Value
Accumulated Amortization
Net
Carrying
Value

 
Gross Carrying
Value

Accumulated Amortization
Net
Carrying
Value

Customer relationships$185
$(151)$34
 $205
$(143)$62
Bottlers' franchise rights30
(18)12
 213
(152)61
Trademarks186
(91)95
 182
(73)109
Other88
(61)27
 94
(64)30
Total$489
$(321)$168
 $694
$(432)$262

Total amortization expense for intangible assets subject to amortization was $49$165 million, $68$203 million and $139$120 million in 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, respectively. The increase in amortization expense in 2020 was due to the recognition of a full year of intangible amortization related to CCBA versus seven months in 2019.
Based on the carrying value of definite-lived intangible assets as of December 31, 2018,2021, we estimate our amortization expense for the next five years will be as follows (in millions):
Amortization
Expense
2022$106 
202381 
202466 
202559 
202647 
  
Amortization
Expense

2019 $44
2020 34
2021 26
2022 25
2023 25
NOTE 10: 8: ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED EXPENSES
Accounts payable and accrued expenses consisted of the following (in millions):
December 31,20212020
Accounts payable$4,602 $3,517 
Accrued marketing expenses2,830 1,930 
Variable consideration payable1,118 1,137 
Accrued compensation1,051 609 
Other accrued expenses5,018 3,952 
Accounts payable and accrued expenses$14,619 $11,145 
NOTE 9: LEASES
December 31,2018
 2017
Accrued marketing$1,787
 $2,108
Trade accounts payable2,498
 2,288
Other accrued expenses3,352
1 
3,071
Accrued compensation894
 854
Sales, payroll and other taxes315
 347
Container deposits86
 80
Accounts payable and accrued expenses$8,932
 $8,748
We have operating leases primarily for real estate, aircraft, vehicles, and manufacturing and other equipment.
Balance sheet information related to operating leases is as follows (in millions):
December 31,20212020
Operating lease ROU assets1
$1,418 $1,548 
Current portion of operating lease liabilities2
$310 $322 
Noncurrent portion of operating lease liabilities3
1,161 1,300 
Total operating lease liabilities$1,471 $1,622 
1 Operating lease ROU assets are included in the line item other noncurrent assets in our consolidated balance sheets.
2 The current portion of operating lease liabilities is included in the line item accounts payable and accrued expenses in our consolidated balance sheets.
3 The noncurrent portion of operating lease liabilities is included in the line item other noncurrent liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets.
We had operating lease costs of $342 million and $353 million for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. During 2021 and 2020, cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of operating lease liabilities was $352 million and $365 million, respectively. Operating lease ROU assets obtained in exchange for operating lease obligations were $194 million and $528 million for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
Information associated with the measurement of our operating lease obligations as of December 31, 2021 is as follows:
1
Weighted-average remaining lease term
The increase in other accrued expenses is primarily due to incremental estimated variable consideration due to third-party customers. Refer to Note 1 and Note 3 for additional information on our adoption of ASC 606 that became effective on January 1, 2018.8 years
Weighted-average discount rate2.7 %
87


Our leases have remaining lease terms of 1 year to 43 years, inclusive of renewal or termination options that we are reasonably certain to exercise.
The following table summarizes the maturities of our operating lease liabilities as of December 31, 2021 (in millions):
Maturities of Operating Lease Liabilities
2022$324 
2023284 
2024231 
2025190 
2026142 
Thereafter476 
Total operating lease payments1,647 
Less: Imputed interest176 
Total operating lease liabilities$1,471 
NOTE 11:10: DEBT AND BORROWING ARRANGEMENTS
Short-Term Borrowings
Loans and notes payable consist primarily of commercial paper issued in the United States. As of December 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, we had $13,063$2,462 million and $12,931$1,329 million, respectively, in outstanding commercial paper borrowings. Our weighted-average interest rates for commercial paper outstanding were approximately 2.60.1 percent and 1.41.3 percent per year as of December 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, respectively. As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Company also had $845 million and $854 million, respectively, in lines of credit, short-term credit facilities and other short-term borrowings that were related to our international operations.
In addition, we had $10,483$9,972 million in unused lines of credit and other short-term credit facilities as of December 31, 2018. The Company's total lines2021, of credit included $131which $8,060 million that was outstanding and primarily related to our international operations.
Included in the credit facilities discussed above, the Company had $7,895 million incorporate backup lines of credit for general corporate purposes. These backup lines of credit expire at various times from 20192022 through 2022.2027. There were no borrowings under these


corporate backup lines of credit during 2018.2021. These credit facilities are subject to normal banking terms and conditions. Some of the financial arrangements require compensating balances, none of which is presently significant to our Company.
Long-Term Debt
During 2018,2021, the Company issued fixed interest rate U.S. dollar- and euro-denominated notes of $5,950 million and €3,150 million, respectively, with maturity dates ranging from 2028 to 2051 and interest rates ranging from 0.125 percent to 3.000 percent. The carrying value of these notes as of December 31, 2021 was $9,410 million.
During 2021, the Company retired upon maturity $3,276variable interest rate euro-denominated notes of €371 million total principal amount of notes and debentures. The general terms ofwith an interest rate equal to the notes and debentures retired are as follows:three-month Euro Interbank Offered Rate (“EURIBOR”) plus 0.200 percent.
$26 million total principal amount of debentures due January 29, 2018, at aDuring 2021, the Company also extinguished prior to maturity fixed interest rate U.S. dollar- and euro-denominated notes of 9.66 percent;
$750$6,500 million total principal amountand €2,430 million, respectively, with maturity dates ranging from 2023 to 2026 and interest rates ranging from 0.750 percent to 3.200 percent. These extinguishments resulted in associated charges of notes due March 14, 2018, at a fixed interest rate of 1.65 percent;
$1,250$559 million total principal amount of notes due April 1, 2018, at a fixed interest rate of 1.15 percent; and
$1,250 million total principal amount of notes due November 1, 2018, at a fixed interest rate of 1.65 percent.
The Company also extinguished a portion of the long-term debt that was assumed in connection with our acquisition of Coca‑Cola Enterprises Inc.'s former North America business ("Old CCE"). The extinguished debentures had a total principal amount of $94 million that was due to mature on May 15, 2098, at a fixed interest rate of 7.00 percent. Related to this extinguishment, the Company recorded a net gain of $27 million in the line item interest expense in our consolidated statement of income duringincome. These charges included the year ended December 31, 2018.difference between the reacquisition price and the net carrying value of the notes extinguished, including the impact of the related fair value hedging relationships. We also incurred charges of $91 million as a result of the reclassification of related cash flow hedging balances from AOCI into income.
During 2017,2020, the Company issued fixed interest rate U.S. dollar- and euro-denominated debtnotes of $1,000$15,600 million and €2,500€2,600 million, respectively.respectively, with maturity dates ranging from 2025 to 2060 and interest rates ranging from 0.125 percent to 4.200 percent. The carrying value of this debtthese notes as of December 31, 20172020 was $3,974$17,616 million. The general terms of the notes issued are as follows:
$500 million total principal amount of notes due May 25, 2022, at a fixed interest rate of 2.20 percent;
$500 million total principal amount of notes due May 25, 2027, at a fixed interest rate of 2.90 percent;
€1,500 million total principal amount of notes due March 8, 2019, at a variable interest rate equal to the three-month Euro Interbank Offered Rate ("EURIBOR") plus 0.25 percent;
€500 million total principal amount of notes due March 9, 2021, at a fixed interest rate of 0.00 percent; and
€500 million total principal amount of notes due March 8, 2024, at a fixed interest rate of 0.50 percent.
During 2017,During 2020, the Company retired upon maturity €2,000fixed interest rate Australian dollar- and U.S. dollar-denominated notes of AUD450 million total principal amountand $3,750 million, respectively, with interest rates ranging from 1.875 percent to 3.150 percent. Additionally, the Company retired upon maturity U.S. dollar zero coupon notes of $171 million.
During 2020, the Company also extinguished prior to maturity fixed interest rate U.S. dollar- and euro-denominated notes due March 9, 2017, atof $3,815 million and €2,300 million, respectively, with maturity dates ranging from 2021 to 2050 and interest rates ranging from
88


0.000 percent to 4.200 percent. Additionally, the Company extinguished prior to maturity variable interest rate euro-denominated notes of €379 million with a variablematurity date in 2021 and an interest rate equal to the three-month EURIBOR plus 0.15 percent, $2060.200 percent. These extinguishments resulted in associated charges of $459 million total principal amount of notes due August 1, 2017, at a fixed interest rate of 7.125 percent, SFr200 million total principal amount of notes due October 2, 2017, at a fixed interest rate of 0.00 percent, $750 million total principal amount of notes due October 27, 2017, at a fixed interest rate of 0.875 percent, and $225 million total principal amount of notes due November 16, 2017, at a variable interest rate equal to the three-month London Interbank Offered Rate ("LIBOR") plus 0.05 percent. The Company also extinguished a portion of the long-term debt that was assumed in connection with our acquisition of Old CCE. The extinguished notes had a carrying value of $417 million, which included fair value adjustments recorded as part of purchase accounting. The general terms of the notes extinguished were as follows:

$95.6 million total principal amount of notes due August 15, 2019, at a fixed interest rate of 4.50 percent;
$38.6 million total principal amount of notes due February 1, 2022, at a fixed interest rate of 8.50 percent;
$11.7 million total principal amount of notes due September 15, 2022, at a fixed interest rate of 8.00 percent;
$36.5 million total principal amount of notes due September 15, 2023, at a fixed interest rate of 6.75 percent;
$9.9 million total principal amount of notes due October 1, 2026, at a fixed interest rate of 7.00 percent;
$53.8 million total principal amount of notes due November 15, 2026, at a fixed interest rate of 6.95 percent;
$41.3 million total principal amount of notes due September 15, 2028, at a fixed interest rate of 6.75 percent;
$32.0 million total principal amount of notes due October 15, 2036, at a fixed interest rate of 6.70 percent;
$3.4 million total principal amount of notes due March 18, 2037, at a fixed interest rate of 5.71 percent;
$24.3 million total principal amount of notes due January 15, 2038, at a fixed interest rate of 6.75 percent; and
$4.7 million total principal amount of notes due May 15, 2098, at a fixed interest rate of 7.00 percent.
The Company recorded a net charge of $38 million in the line item interest expense in our consolidated statement of income duringincome. These charges included the year ended December 31, 2017.


difference between the reacquisition price and the net carrying value of the notes extinguished, including the impact of the related fair value hedging relationships. We also incurred charges of $25 million as a result of the reclassification of related cash flow hedging balances from AOCI into income.
During 2016,2019, the Company issued Australian dollar-,fixed interest rate euro- and U.S. dollar-denominated debtnotes of AUD1,000 million, €500€2,750 million and $3,725$2,000 million, respectively. The general terms ofrespectively, with maturity dates ranging from 2022 to 2031 and interest rates ranging from 0.125 percent to 2.125 percent. Additionally, the notesCompany issued are as follows:
AUD450 million total principal amount of notes due June 9, 2020, at a fixedvariable interest rate euro-denominated notes of 2.60 percent;
AUD550€750 million total principal amount of notes due June 11, 2024, at a fixed interest rate of 3.25 percent;
€500 million total principal amount of notes due September 2, 2036, at a fixed interest rate of 1.10 percent;
$225 million total principal amount of notes due November 16, 2017, at a variable maturing in 2021 with an interest rate equal to the three-month LIBOREURIBOR plus 0.05 percent;
$1,000 million total principal amount0.200 percent. The carrying value of these notes due May 30,as of December 31, 2019 at a fixed interest rate of 1.375 percent;
$1,000 million total principal amount of notes due September 1, 2021, at a fixed interest rate of 1.55 percent;
$500 million total principal amount of notes due June 1, 2026, at a fixed interest rate of 2.55 percent; and
$1,000 million total principal amount of notes due September 1, 2026, at a fixed interest rate of 2.25 percent.
was $5,891 million.
During 2016,2019, the Company retired upon maturity $1,654 million total principal amount of notes due September 1, 2016 at a fixedvariable interest rate euro-denominated notes of 1.80 percent, $500€3,500 million total principal amount of notes due November 1, 2016 at a fixedwith interest rate of 0.75 percent and $500 million total principal amount of notes due November 1, 2016 at a variable interest raterates equal to the three-month LIBOREURIBOR plus 0.100.230 percent and the three-month EURIBOR plus 0.250 percent. Additionally, the Company retired upon maturity fixed interest rate U.S. dollar-denominated notes of $1,000 million with an interest rate of 1.375 percent.
The Company'sCompany’s long-term debt consisted of the following (in millions except average rate data):
December 31, 2021December 31, 2020
Amount
Average Rate1
Amount
Average Rate1
Fixed interest rate long-term debt:
U.S. dollar notes due 2023-2093$21,953 2.2 %$22,550 2.0 %
U.S. dollar debentures due 2022-20981,316 5.2 1,342 5.1 
Australian dollar notes due 2024398 2.5 400 2.5 
Euro notes due 2023-204113,249 0.4 13,369 0.3 
Swiss franc notes due 2022-20281,234 2.3 1,236 2.7 
Variable interest rate long-term debt:
Euro notes due 2021  452 0.0 
Other, due through 20982
821 6.0 615 5.2 
Fair value adjustments3
483              N/A646               N/A
Total4,5
39,454 1.7 %40,610 1.6 %
Less: Current portion1,338  485  
Long-term debt$38,116  $40,125  
 December 31, 2018 December 31, 2017
 Amount
 
Average
Rate 1

 Amount
 
Average
Rate1

U.S. dollar notes due 2019–2093$13,619
 2.6% $16,854
 2.3%
U.S. dollar debentures due 2020–20981,390
 5.2
 1,559
 5.5
U.S. dollar zero coupon notes due 20202
163
 8.4
 158
 8.4
Australian dollar notes due 2020–2024723
 2.2
 760
 2.1
Euro notes due 2019–203612,994
 0.6
 13,663
 0.7
Swiss franc notes due 2022–20281,128
 3.6
 1,148
 3.0
Other, due through 20983
282
 3.4
 325
 3.4
Fair value adjustments4
62
 N/A
 13
 N/A
Total5,6
30,361
 1.9% 34,480
 1.8%
Less current portion4,997
  
 3,298
  
Long-term debt$25,364
  
 $31,182
  
1
These rates1Rates represent the weighted-average effective interest rate on the balances outstanding as of year end, as adjusted for the effects of interest rate swap agreements, cross-currency swap agreements and fair value adjustments, if applicable. Refer to Note 6 for a more detailed discussion on interest rate management.
2
Amount is shown net of unamortized discounts of $8 million and $13 million as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
3
As of December 31, 2018, the amount shown includes $136 million of debt instruments that are due through 2031.
4
Amount represents changes in fair value due to changes in benchmark interest rates. Refer to Note 6 for additional information about our fair value hedging strategy.
5
As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the fair value of our long-term debt, including the current portion, was $30,438 million and $35,169 million, respectively.
6
The above notes and debentures include various restrictions, none of which is presently significant to our Company.
The carrying value of the Company's long-term debt included fair value adjustments, relatedif applicable. Refer to the debt assumed from Old CCE's former North America business in 2010Note 5 for a more detailed discussion on interest rate management.
2As of $212 million and $263 million as of December 31, 20182021, the amount shown includes $690 million of debt instruments and 2017, respectively. Thesefinance leases that are due through 2046.
3Amounts represent the changes in fair values due to changes in benchmark interest rates. Refer to Note 5 for additional information about our fair value adjustments are being amortized over the number of years remaining until the underlying debt matures. hedging strategy.
4As of December 31, 2018,2021 and 2020, the weighted-average maturity of the assumed debt to which these fair value adjustments relateof our long-term debt, including the current portion, was approximately 19 years. $40,311 million and $43,218 million, respectively.
5The amortizationabove notes and debentures include various restrictions, none of these fair value adjustments will be a reduction of interest expense in future periods, which will typically result inis presently significant to our interest expense being less than the actual interest paid to service the debt. Company.
Total interest paid was $871$738 million,, $757 $935 million and $663$921 million in 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, respectively.


MaturitiesThe following table summarizes the maturities of long-term debt for the five years succeeding December 31, 2018 are as follows2021 (in millions):
Maturities of
Long-Term Debt
2022$1,338 
2023177 
20242,023 
202518 
20261,733 
89
 
Maturities of
Long-Term Debt

2019$4,997
20204,265
20212,929
20222,414
20234,099


NOTE 12:11: COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Guarantees
As of December 31, 2018,2021, we were contingently liable for guarantees of indebtedness owed by third parties of $600$440 million,, of which $247$93 million was related to VIEs. Refer to Note 1 for additional information related to the Company'sCompany’s maximum exposure to loss due to our involvement with VIEs. Our guarantees are primarily related to third-party customers, bottlers vendors and container manufacturing operationsvendors and have arisen through the normal course of business. These guarantees have various terms, and none of these guarantees is individually significant. These amounts represent the maximum potential future payments that we could be required to make under the guarantees; however, we doguarantees. However, management has concluded that the likelihood of any significant amounts being paid by our Company under these guarantees is not consider it probable that we will be required to satisfy these guarantees.probable.
We believe our exposure to concentrations of credit risk is limited due to the diverse geographic areas covered by our operations.
Legal Contingencies
The Company is involved in various legal proceedings. We establish reserves for specific legal proceedings when we determine that the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome is probable and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. Management has also identified certain other legal matters where we believe an unfavorable outcome is reasonably possible and/or for which no estimate of possible losses can be made. Management believes that the total liabilities of the Company that may arise as a result of currently pending legal proceedings (excluding tax audit claims) will not have a material adverse effect on the Company taken as a whole.
Indemnifications
At the time we acquire or divest an ownership interest in an entity, we sometimes agree to indemnify the seller or buyer for specific contingent liabilities. Management believes that any liability to the Company that may arise as a result of any such indemnification agreements will not have a material adverse effect on the Company taken as a whole. Refer to Note 2.
Tax Audits
The Company is involved in various tax matters, with respect to some of which the outcome is uncertain. We establish reserves to remove some or all of the tax benefit of any of our tax positions at the time we determine that it becomes uncertain based upon one of the following conditions: (1) the tax position is not "more“more likely than not"not” to be sustained; (2) the tax position is "more“more likely than not"not” to be sustained but for a lesser amount; or (3) the tax position is "more“more likely than not"not” to be sustained but not in the financial period in which the tax position was originally taken. For purposes of evaluating whether or not a tax position is uncertain, (1) we presume the tax position will be examined by the relevant taxing authority that has full knowledge of all relevant information; (2) the technical merits of a tax position are derived from authorities, such as legislation and statutes, legislative intent, regulations, rulings and case lawcaselaw and their applicability to the facts and circumstances of the tax position; and (3) each tax position is evaluated without consideration of the possibility of offset or aggregation with other tax positions taken. A number of years may elapse before a particular uncertain tax position is audited and finally resolved. The number of years subject to tax audits or tax assessments varies depending on the tax jurisdiction. The tax benefit that has been previously reserved because of a failure to meet the "more“more likely than not"not” recognition threshold would be recognized in our income tax expense in the first interim period whenquarter in which the uncertainty disappears under any one of the following conditions: (1) the tax position is "more“more likely than not"not” to be sustained; (2) the tax position, amount, and/or timing is ultimately settled through negotiation or litigation; or (3) the statute of limitations for the tax position has expired. Refer to Note 15.14.
On September 17, 2015, the Company received a Statutory Notice of Deficiency ("Notice"(“Notice”) from the U.S. Internal Revenue Service ("IRS"(“IRS”) seeking approximately $3.3 billion of additional federal income tax for the tax years 2007 through 2009, after a five-year audit.2009. In the Notice, the IRS claimedstated its intent to reallocate over $9 billion of income to the U.S. parent company from certain of its foreign affiliates that the Company's United States taxable income should be increased by an amount that creates a potential additional federal income tax liability of approximately $3.3 billion forU.S. parent company licensed to manufacture, distribute, sell, market and promote its products in certain non-U.S. markets.
The Notice concerned the period, plus interest. No penalties were asserted in the Notice. The disputed amounts largely relate to aCompany’s transfer pricing matter involvingbetween its U.S. parent company and certain of its foreign affiliates. IRS rules governing transfer pricing require arm’s-length pricing of transactions between related parties such as the appropriate amount of taxable income the Company shouldCompany’s U.S. parent and its foreign affiliates.


report in the United States in connection with its licensing of intangible property to certain related foreign licensees regarding the manufacturing, distribution, sale, marketing and promotion of products in overseas markets.
During the 2007-2009 audit period, the Company followedTo resolve the same transfer pricing issue for the tax years 1987 through 1995, the Company and the IRS had agreed in 1996 on an arm’s-length methodology for these licensesdetermining the amount of U.S. taxable income that had consistently been followed since the methodology was agreed withU.S. parent company would report as compensation from its foreign licensees. The Company and the IRS memorialized this accord in a 1996 closing agreement resolving that applied back to 1987.dispute (“Closing Agreement”). The closing agreementClosing Agreement provided prospective penalty protection conditioned on the Company's continued adherence to the prescribed methodologythat, absent a change in material facts or circumstances and relevant federal tax law. Although the IRS subsequently asserted, without explanation, that material facts and circumstances andor relevant federal tax law, had changed, it hasin calculating the Company’s income taxes going forward, the Company would not asserted penalties. be assessed
90


penalties by the IRS for using the agreed-upon tax calculation methodology that the Company and the IRS agreed would be used for the 1987 through 1995 tax years.
The Company'sIRS audited and confirmed the Company’s compliance with the closing agreement was audited and confirmed by the IRSagreed-upon Closing Agreement methodology in five successive audit cycles coveringfor tax years 1996 through 2006.
The September 17, 2015 Notice from the subsequent 11IRS retroactively rejected the previously agreed-upon methodology for the 2007 through 2009 tax years in favor of an entirely different methodology, without prior notice to the Company. Using the new tax calculation methodology, the IRS reallocated over $9 billion of income to the U.S. parent company from its foreign licensees for tax years 2007 through 2006,2009. Consistent with the last audit concluding as recently as 2009.Closing Agreement, the IRS did not assert penalties, and it has yet to do so.
The Notice represents a repudiation of the methodology previously adopted in the 1996 closing agreement. The IRS designated the Company’s matter for litigation on October 15, 2015. ToLitigation designation is an IRS determination that forecloses to a company any and all alternative means for resolution of a tax dispute. As a result of the extentIRS’ designation of the Company’s matter for litigation, the Company was forced to either accept the IRS’ newly imposed tax assessment and pay the full amount of the asserted tax or litigate the matter in the federal courts. The matter remains designated,subject to the IRS’ litigation designation, preventing the Company will be prevented from pursuing any administrative settlement at IRS Appealsattempt to settle or underotherwise mutually resolve the IRS Advance Pricing and Mutual Agreement Program.matter with the IRS.
The Company firmly believes that the IRS' claims are without merit and is pursuing, and will continue to pursue, all available administrative and judicial remedies necessary to vigorously defend its position. To that end, the Company filedconsequently initiated litigation by filing a petition in the U.S. Tax Court on(“Tax Court”) in December 14, 2015, andchallenging the tax adjustments enumerated in the Notice.
Prior to trial, the IRS filed its answer on February 12, 2016. On October 4, 2017, the IRS filed an amended answer to the Company's petition in which it increased its transfer pricing adjustment by $385 million, resulting in an additional tax adjustment of $135 million.
On June 20, 2017, the The Company filedobtained a motion for summary judgment in its favor on the portion of the IRS' adjustmentsa different matter related to our licensee in Mexico. On December 14, 2017, the U.S. Tax Court issued a decision on the summary judgment motion in favor of the Company. This decisionMexican foreign tax credits, which thereafter effectively reduced the IRS'IRS’ potential tax adjustment by approximately $138 million.
The U.S. Tax Court trial was held in the Tax Court from March 8, 2018 through May 11, 2018. The Company2018, and the IRSfinal post-trial briefs were filed and exchanged final post-trial briefs in FebruaryApril 2019. It is not known how much time will elapse thereafter prior
On November 18, 2020, the Tax Court issued an opinion (“Opinion”) in which it predominantly sided with the IRS but agreed with the Company that dividends previously paid by the foreign licensees to the issuanceU.S. parent company in reliance upon the Closing Agreement should continue to be allowed to offset royalties, including those that would become payable to the Company in accordance with the Opinion. The Tax Court reserved ruling on the effect of Brazilian legal restrictions on the payment of royalties by the Company’s licensee in Brazil until after the Tax Court issues its opinion in the separate case of 3M Co. & Subs. v. Commissioner, T.C. Docket No. 5816-13 (filed March 11, 2013). Once the Tax Court issues its opinion in 3M Co. & Subs. v. Commissioner, the Company expects the Tax Court thereafter to render another opinion, and ultimately a final decision, in the Company’s case.
The Company believes that the IRS and the Tax Court misinterpreted and misapplied the applicable regulations in reallocating income earned by the Company’s foreign licensees to increase the Company’s U.S. tax. Moreover, the Company believes that the retroactive imposition of such tax liability using a calculation methodology different from that previously agreed upon by the IRS and the Company, and audited by the IRS for over a decade, is unconstitutional. The Company intends to assert its claims on appeal and vigorously defend its position.
In determining the amount of tax reserve to be recorded as of December 31, 2020, the Company completed the required two-step evaluation process prescribed by Accounting Standards Codification 740, Accounting for Income Taxes. In doing so, we consulted with outside advisors and we reviewed and considered relevant laws, rules, and regulations, including, but not limited to, the Opinion and relevant caselaw. We also considered our intention to vigorously defend our positions and assert our various well-founded legal claims via every available avenue of appeal. We concluded, based on the technical and legal merits of the Court's decision.Company’s tax positions, that it is more likely than not the Company’s tax positions will ultimately be sustained on appeal. In addition, we considered a number of alternative transfer pricing methodologies, including the interim, or subsequentmethodology asserted by the IRS and affirmed in the Opinion (“Tax Court Methodology”), that could be applied by the courts upon final resolution of the litigation. Based on the required probability analysis, we determined the methodologies we believe the federal courts could ultimately order to be used in calculating the Company’s tax. As a result of this analysis, we recorded a tax reserve of $438 million during the year ended December 31, 2020 related to the Tax Court's decision,application of the IRS may propose similar adjustments for years subsequentresulting methodologies as well as the different tax treatment applicable to dividends originally paid to the 2007-2009 litigation period. U.S. parent company by its foreign licensees, in reliance upon the Closing Agreement, that would be recharacterized as royalties in accordance with the Opinion and the Company’s analysis.
The Company’s conclusion that it is more likely than not the Company’s tax positions will ultimately be sustained on appeal is unchanged as of December 31, 2021. However, we updated our calculation of the methodologies we believe the federal courts could ultimately order to be used in calculating the Company’s tax. As a result of the application of the required probability
91


analysis to these updated calculations and the accrual of interest through the current reporting period, we updated our tax reserve as of December 31, 2021 to $400 million.
While the Company continues to strongly disagreedisagrees with the IRS' position, there is no assurance thatIRS’ positions and the U.S. Tax Court will rule inportions of the Company's favor, andOpinion affirming such positions, it is possible that allsome portion or some portionall of the adjustment proposed by the IRS Noticeand sustained by the Tax Court could ultimately could be sustained.upheld. In that event, the Company willwould likely be subject to significant additional liabilities for thetax years at issue2007 through 2009, and potentially also for subsequent periods,years, which could have a material adverse impact on the Company'sCompany’s financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.
The Company regularly assessescalculated the likelihoodpotential impact of adverse outcomes resultingapplying the Tax Court Methodology to reallocate income from foreign licensees potentially covered within the scope of the Opinion, assuming such methodology were to be ultimately upheld by the courts, and the IRS were to decide to apply that methodology to subsequent years, with consent of the federal courts. This impact would include taxes and interest accrued through December 31, 2021 for the 2007 through 2009 litigated tax disputes such as thisyears and other examinations for all opensubsequent tax years from 2010 through 2021. The calculations incorporated the estimated impact of correlative adjustments to determine the adequacy of its tax reserves. Any such adjustments related to years prior to 2018, either in the litigation period or later, may have an impact on thepreviously accrued transition tax payable as part ofunder the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs ActAct. The Company estimates that the potential aggregate incremental tax and interest liability could be approximately $13 billion as of 2017.December 31, 2021. Additional income tax and interest would continue to accrue until the time any such potential liability, or portion thereof, were to be paid. We currently project the continued application of the Tax Court Methodology in future years, assuming similar facts and circumstances as of December 31, 2021, would result in an incremental annual tax liability that would increase the Company’s effective tax rate by approximately 3.5 percent.
The Company does not know when the Tax Court will issue its opinion regarding the effect of Brazilian legal restrictions on the payment of royalties by the Company’s licensee in Brazil for the 2007 through 2009 tax years. After the Tax Court issues its opinion on the Company’s Brazilian licensee, the Company and the IRS will be provided time to agree on the tax impact, if any, of both opinions, after which the Tax Court would render a final decision in the case. The Company will have 90 days thereafter to file a notice of appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit and pay the tax liability and interest related to the 2007 through 2009 tax years. The Company currently estimates that the payment to be made at that time related to the 2007 through 2009 tax years, which is included in the above estimate of the potential aggregate incremental tax and interest liability, would be approximately $4.9 billion (including interest accrued through December 31, 2021), plus any additional interest accrued through the time of payment. Some or all of this amount would be refunded if the Company were to prevail on appeal.
Risk Management Programs
The Company has numerous global insurance programs in place to help protect the Company from the risk of loss. In general, we are self-insured for large portions of many different types of claims; however, we do use commercial insurance above our self-insured retentions to reduce the Company'sCompany’s risk of catastrophic loss. Our reserves for the Company'sCompany’s self-insured losses are estimated using actuarial methods and assumptions of the insurance industry, adjusted for our specific expectations based on our claimclaims history. Our self-insurance reserves totaled $362$229 million and $480$265 million as of December 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, respectively.


Operating Leases
The following table summarizes our minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases with initial or remaining lease terms in excess of one year as of December 31, 2018 (in millions):
 Operating Lease Payments
2019$144
202084
202170
202260
202342
Thereafter100
Total minimum operating lease payments1
$500
1
Income associated with sublease arrangements is not significant.
NOTE 13: 12: STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION PLANS
Our Company grants long-term equity awards under its stock-based compensation plans to certain employees of the Company. Total stock-based compensation expense was $225 million, $219 million and $258 million in 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and was included as a component of selling, general and administrative expenses in our consolidated statements of income. The total income tax benefit recognized in our consolidated statements of income related to awards under these plans was $47 million, $44 million and $71 million in 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. From 2015 to 2017, certain employees who had previously been eligible for long-term equity awards received long-term performance cash awards. Employees who received these performance cash awards did not receive equity awards as part of the long-term incentive program. In 2017, the Company changed the long-term incentive program for certain employees previously eligible for the performance cash award. These employees no longer participate in the long-term incentive program and were issued a final restricted stock unit award that vests ratably over five years.
As of December 31, 2018, we had $271 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested stock-based compensation awards granted under our plans. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.5 years as stock‑based compensation expense. This expected cost does not include the impact of any future stock-based compensation awards.
The Coca-Cola Company 2014 Equity Plan ("(“2014 Equity Plan"Plan”) was approved by shareowners in April 2014. Under the 2014 Equity Plan, a maximum of 500 million shares of our common stock was approved to be issued through the grant of equity awards, to certain employees.awards. The 2014 Equity Plan allows for grants of stock options, performance share units, restricted stock, units, restricted stock units and other specified award types, including cash awards with performance-based vesting criteria. As of December 31, 2018,2021, there were 391.9approximately 329 million shares available to be granted under the 2014 Equity Plan. In addition, there were 2.9approximately 3 million shares fromavailable for stock option and restricted stock award grants under plans approved by shareowners prior to 2014 available2014.
From 2015 to be2017, certain employees who had previously been eligible for long-term equity awards received long-term performance-based cash awards. Employees who received these performance-based cash awards did not receive equity awards as part of the long-term incentive program. In 2017, the Company changed the long-term incentive program for employees previously eligible for the performance-based cash award. These employees no longer participate in the long-term incentive program and were granted a final restricted stock unit award that vests ratably over five years.
Total stock-based compensation expense was $337 million, $141 million and $201 million in 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively. In 2020, for certain employees who accepted voluntary separation from the Company as a result of our strategic realignment initiatives, the Company modified their outstanding equity awards granted prior to 2020 so that the employees
92


retained all or some of their awards, whereas otherwise the awards would have been forfeited. The incremental stock-based compensation expense in 2020 arising from the modifications was $15 million, which was recorded in the line item other operating charges in our consolidated statement of income. Refer to Note 18 for additional information on the Company’s strategic realignment initiatives. The remainder of stock-based compensation expense in 2020 of $126 million and all stock-based compensation expense in 2021 and 2019 were recorded in the line item selling, general and administrative expenses in our consolidated statements of income. The total income tax benefit recognized in our consolidated statements of income related to total stock-based compensation expense was $60 million, $32 million and $43 million in 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
As of December 31, 2021, we had $335 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested stock-based compensation awards granted under stock option and restricted stock award plans.


our plans, which we expect to recognize over a weighted-average period of 1.9 years as stock‑based compensation expense. This expected cost does not include the impact of any future stock-based compensation awards.
Stock Option Awards
Stock options haveoption awards are generally been granted with an exercise price equal to the average of the high and low market prices per share forof the Company'sCompany’s stock on the date of grant. The fair value of each stock option award is estimated using a Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model and is amortizedexpensed on a straight-line basis over the vesting period, which is generally four years.
The weighted-average fair value of stock options granted during the past three years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019 and the weighted-average assumptions used in the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model for such grants were as follows:
Year Ended December 31,202120202019
Fair value of stock options on grant date$5.08 $6.44 $4.94 
Dividend yield1
3.3 %2.7 %3.5 %
Expected volatility2
18.0 %16.0 %15.5 %
Risk-free interest rate3
0.9 %1.4 %2.6 %
Expected term of stock options4
6 years6 years6 years
Year Ended December 31,2018
 2017
 2016
Fair value of stock options at grant date$4.97
 $3.98
 $4.17
Dividend yield1
3.5% 3.6% 3.2%
Expected volatility2
15.5% 15.5% 16.0%
Risk-free interest rate3
2.8% 2.2% 1.5%
Expected term of the stock options4
6 years
 6 years
 6 years
1The dividend yield is the calculated yield on the closing market price per share of the Company’s stock on the grant date.
1
The dividend yield is the calculated yield on the Company's stock at the time of the grant.
2
Expected volatility is based on implied volatilities from traded options on the Company's stock, historical volatility of the Company's stock and other factors.
3
2The expected volatility is based on implied volatilities from traded options on the Company’s stock, historical volatility of the Company’s stock and other factors.
3The risk-free interest rate for the period matching the expected term of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of the grant.
4
The expected term of the stock options represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding and is derived by analyzing historical exercise behavior.
Generally, stock options granted from 1999 through July 2003 expired 15 years fromis based on the dateU.S. Treasury yield curve in effect on the grant date.
4The expected term of grant, andthe stock options represents the period of time that options granted in December 2003are expected to be outstanding and thereafteris derived by analyzing historical exercise behavior.
Stock option awards generally expire 10 years fromafter the date of grant. The shares of common stock to be issued and/or sold upon the exercise of stock options are made available from either authorized and unissued Company common stock or from the Company's treasury shares. InSince 2007, the Company began issuinghas issued common stock under its stock-based compensation plans from the Company's treasury shares.
Stock option activity for all plans forduring the year ended December 31, 20182021 was as follows:
Shares
(In millions)
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price
Weighted-Average
Remaining
Contractual Life
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
(In millions)
Outstanding on January 1, 202188 $40.55   
Granted50.59   
Exercised(19)36.32   
Forfeited/expired(1)54.18   
Outstanding on December 31, 202175 $42.43 4.2 years$1,264 
Expected to vest74 $42.32 4.1 years$1,256 
Exercisable on December 31, 202159 $40.08 3.1 years$1,138 
 
Shares
(In millions)

 
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price

 
Weighted-Average
Remaining
Contractual Life
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
(In millions)

Outstanding on January 1, 2018173
 $35.02
    
Granted8
 44.49
    
Exercised(47) 31.51
    
Forfeited/expired(1) 41.22
    
Outstanding on December 31, 20181
133
 $36.74
 4.59 years $1,407
Expected to vest132
 $36.69
 4.56 years $1,402
Exercisable on December 31, 2018114
 $35.74
 4.02 years $1,327
1
Includes 0.1 million stock option replacement awards in connection with our acquisition of Old CCE in 2010. These options had a weighted-average exercise price of $17.35 and generally vest over 3 years and expire 10 years from the original date of grant.
The total intrinsic value of the stock options exercised was $721$358 million, $744$453 million and $787$609 million in 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, respectively. The total sharesnumber of stock options exercised were 47was approximately 19 million, 5323 million and 5034 million in 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, respectively.
93


Performance-Based Share Unit Awards
Performance-basedPerformance share unit awards require achievement of certain performance criteria, which are predefined by the Talent and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors at the time of grant. For performance share unit grantsawards granted from 2015 through 2017, the performance criteria used were economic profit and net operating revenues over a predefined performance period of three years. Economic profit is our net operating profit after tax less the cost of the capital used in our business. Economic profit and net operating revenues are adjusted for certain items, which are approved and certified by the Audit Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors.Directors (“Audit Committee”). The purpose of these adjustments is to ensure a consistent year-to-year comparison of the specific performance criteria. These grants includeawards included a relative TSR modifier to determine the final number of shares earned at the end of the performance period.share units earned. For these awards, the number of sharesperformance share units earned based on the certified achievement of the predefined performance criteria will bewas reduced or increased if the Company'sCompany’s total shareowner return over the performance period relative


to a predefined compensation comparator group of companies fallsfell outside of a definedpredefined range. The fair value of these performance share units was determined using a Monte Carlo valuation model. The performance share unitsunit awards granted from 2015 through 2017 arewere subject to a one-year holding period after the performance period before the shares arewere released.
In 2018, the Company renamed ourFor performance share unit awards to growth share unit awards. For growth share units granted infrom 2018 through 2021, the performance criteria were equally weighted among net operating revenues, earnings per share and free cash flow over a predefined performance period of three years. EarningsFor purposes of these performance criteria, earnings per share for these purposes is diluted net income per share from continuing operations and free cash flow is net cash provided by operating activities less purchases of property, plant and equipment. Net operating revenues, earnings per share and free cash flow are adjusted for certain items, which are approved and certified by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors.Committee. The purpose of these adjustments is to ensure a consistent year-to-year comparison of the specific performance criteria. GrowthPerformance share unitsunit awards granted to executives include a relative TSR modifier to determine the final number of shares earned at the end of the performance period.share units earned. The fair value of growthperformance share unit grantsunits that include a TSR modifier is determined using a Monte Carlo valuation model. For these awards, the number of performance share units earned based on the certified achievement of the predefined performance criteria will be reduced or increased if the Company’s total shareowner return over the performance period relative to a predefined compensation comparator group of companies fell outside of a predefined range. The fair value of growthperformance share units that do not include thea TSR modifier is the quotedclosing market valueprice per share of the Company'sCompany’s stock on the grant date less the present value of the expected dividends not received during the performance period. GrowthThe performance share units granted in 2018unit awards will be releasedgenerally vest at the end of the respective performance period.
During 2021, in addition to granting performance share unit awards with a three-year performance period, if the Company granted emerging stronger performance share unit awards with a predefined performance criteriaperiod of two years. The award’s performance criterion is earnings per share, and the award includes a relative TSR modifier. Earnings per share for these purposes is diluted net income per share adjusted for certain items, which are achieved.approved by the Audit Committee. The purpose of these adjustments is to ensure a consistent year-to-year comparison of the performance criterion. The performance share unit awards will generally vest at the end of the two-year performance period.
For all performance-basedperformance share unit awards, in the event the certified results equal the predefined performance criteria, the Company will grant the number of sharesperformance share units earned will be equal to the target award. In the event the certified results exceed the predefined performance criteria, additional sharesperformance share units up to the maximum award will be granted.earned. In the event the certified results fall below the predefined performance criteria but are at or above the minimum threshold, a reduced number of sharesperformance share units will be granted.earned. If the certified results fall below the minimum threshold, no sharesperformance share units will be granted. Performance-basedearned. Performance share unit awards do not entitle participants to vote or receive dividends.dividends until the performance share units are settled in stock.
In the reporting period it becomes probable that the minimum performance threshold specified in the award will be achieved, we recognize compensation expense for the proportionate share of the total fair value of the performance-basedperformance share units related to the vesting period that has already lapsed for the sharesperformance share units expected to vest and be released.vest. The remaining fair value of the sharesperformance share units expected to vest and be released is expensed on a straight-line basis over the balanceremainder of the vesting period. In the event the Company determines it is no longer probable that we will achieve the minimum performance threshold specified in the award will be achieved, we reverse all of the previously recognized compensation expense in the reporting period such a determination is made.
Performance share units and growth share unitsearned are generally settled in stock, except for certain circumstances such as death or disability, in which case employeesbeneficiaries or their beneficiariesemployees are provided a cash equivalent payment.payments. As of December 31, 2018,2021, nonvested performance share units of 2,756,000approximately 1,587,000, 578,000 and 2,837,0002,021,000 were outstanding for the 2016-20182020-2022, 2021-2022 and 2017-20192021-2023 performance periods, respectively, and growth share units of 2,105,000 were outstanding for the 2018-2020 performance period, based on the target award amounts. The following table summarizes information about outstanding nonvested performance share units based on the target award levels:
94


Performance Share Units
(In thousands)
Weighted-Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Nonvested on January 1, 20213,771 $48.29 
Granted2,728 47.04 
Vested1
(1,846)40.29 
Forfeited(467)49.18 
Nonvested on December 31, 20212
4,186 $50.90 
1Represents the target level of performance share units vested at December 31, 2021 for the 2019-2021 performance period. Upon certification in February 2022 of the financial results for the performance period, the final number of shares earned will be determined and released.
2The outstanding nonvested performance share units as of December 31, 2021 at the threshold award and maximum award levels were approximately 1,725,000 and 9,759,000, respectively.
The weighted-average grant date fair value of performance share unit awards granted in 2021, 2020 and 2019 was $47.04, $57.00 and $40.29, respectively.
The following table summarizes information about vested performance share units and growth share units based on the target award amounts:
 
Performance Share Units and Growth Share Units
(In thousands)

 
Weighted-Average
Grant Date
Fair Value

Outstanding on January 1, 20188,212
 $37.14
Granted2,183
 41.02
Conversions to restricted stock units1
(2,111) 36.24
Canceled/forfeited(586) 37.58
Outstanding on December 31, 20182
7,698
 $38.45
1
Represents the target amount of performance share units converted to restricted stock units for the 2015–2017 performance period. The vesting of restricted stock units is subject to the terms of the performance share unit agreements.
2
The outstanding performance share units and growth share units as of December 31, 2018 at the threshold award and maximum award levels were 2.4 million and 15.3 million, respectively.
The weighted–average grant date fair value of growth share units granted in 2018 was $41.02. The weighted–average grant date fair value of performance share units granted in 2017 and 2016 was $34.75 and $39.70, respectively. The Company did not convert any performance share units into cash equivalent payments in 2018. The Company converted performance share units of 11,052 in 2017 and 52,545 in 2016 to cash equivalent payments of $0.4 million and $1.9 million, respectively, to former employees or their beneficiaries due to certain events such as death or disability.


The following table summarizes information about nonvested performance-based restricted stock units based on the performance share units' certified award level:

Restricted
Stock Units
(In thousands)


Weighted-
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value

Nonvested on January 1, 20186,748
 $32.35
Conversions from performance share units2,692
 36.24
Vested and released(6,747) 32.34
Canceled/forfeited(102) 36.18
Nonvested on December 31, 20182,591
 $36.24
2017-2020 Award2018-2020 Award
Performance Share Units
(In thousands)
Weighted-
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Performance Share Units
(In thousands)
Weighted-
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Certified3,728 $35.30 1,014 $41.02 
Released during 2021(3,720)36.31 (1,008)41.72 
Forfeited during 2021(8)35.30 (6)41.02 
The total intrinsic value of restricted sharesperformance share units that were vestedreleased was $237 million, $191 million and released$118 million in 2018 was $305 million.2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
Time-Based Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Unit Awards
Prior to the release date, time-basedTime-based restricted stock and restricted stock unitsunit awards granted fromunder the 2014 Equity Plan do not entitle participantsrecipients to vote or receive dividends during the vesting period and will be forfeited in the event of the recipient'srecipient’s termination of employment, except for reasonscertain circumstances such as death or disability. Certain other time-basedThe fair value of restricted stock awards entitle participants to vote and receive dividends.restricted stock units is the closing market price per share of the Company’s stock on the grant date less the present value of the expected dividends not received during the vesting period. The fair value of the restricted stock and restricted stock units expected to vest and be released is expensed on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. As of December 31, 2018,2021, the Company had outstanding nonvested time-based restricted stock includingand restricted stock units of 3,422,323, most of which do not pay dividends or have voting rights.totaling approximately 3,394,000.
The following table summarizes information about outstanding nonvested time-based restricted stock and restricted stock units:
Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units
(In thousands)
Weighted-Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Nonvested on January 1, 20214,162 $44.18 
Granted1,242 46.20 
Vested and released(1,495)41.91 
Forfeited(515)46.46 
Nonvested on December 31, 20213,394 $46.56 
95
 Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units (In thousands)
 Weighted-Average
Grant Date Fair Value

Nonvested on January 1, 20183,535
 $40.99
Granted1,457
 40.12
Vested and released(1,015) 41.80
Forfeited/expired(555) 41.32
Nonvested on December 31, 20183,422
 $40.31


NOTE 14: 13: PENSION AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS
Our Company sponsors and/or contributes to pension and postretirement health care and life insurance benefit plans covering substantially all U.S. employees. We also sponsor nonqualified, unfunded defined benefit pension plans for certain associates.employees. In addition, our Company and its subsidiaries have various pension plans and other forms of postretirement benefit arrangements outside the United States.
We refer to the funded defined benefit pension plan in the United States that is not associated with collective bargaining agreements as the "primary“primary U.S. plan." As of December 31, 2018,2021, the primary U.S. plan represented 6261 percent and 57 percent of both the Company'sCompany’s consolidated projected benefit obligation and pension assets.


plan assets, respectively.
Obligations and Funded Status
The following table sets forth the changes in the benefit obligations and the fair value of plan assets for our pension and other postretirement benefit plans (in millions):
Pension PlansOther Postretirement Benefit Plans
Year Ended December 31,2021202020212020
Benefit obligation at beginning of year1
$9,414 $8,757 $769 $757 
Service cost97 112 9 11 
Interest cost183 235 15 21 
Participant contributions5 13 12 
Foreign currency exchange rate changes(33)67 (1)(1)
Amendments (13)— 
Net actuarial loss (gain)2
(226)746 (28)22 
Benefits paid(375)(485)(67)(59)
Settlements3
(491)(81) — 
Curtailments3
 (15)(1)
Special termination benefits3  — 
Other3 72  — 
Benefit obligation at end of year1
$8,580 $9,414 $696 $769 
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year$8,639 $8,080 $396 $339 
Actual return on plan assets1,003 830 15 51 
Employer contributions33 30  — 
Participant contributions6 8 
Foreign currency exchange rate changes(42)97  — 
Benefits paid(315)(419) (1)
Settlements3
(421)(53) — 
Other2 73  — 
Fair value of plan assets at end of year$8,905 $8,639 $419 $396 
Net asset (liability) recognized$325 $(775)$(277)$(373)
1 For pension plans, the benefit obligation is the projected benefit obligation. For other postretirement benefit plans, the benefit obligation is the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation. The accumulated benefit obligation for our pension plans was $8,431 million and $9,263 million as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
2 A change in the weighted-average discount rate was the primary driver of net actuarial loss (gain) during 2021 and 2020. For our primary U.S. pension plan, an increase in the discount rate resulted in an actuarial gain of $197 million during 2021, and a decrease in the discount rate resulted in an actuarial loss of $491 million during 2020. Other drivers of net actuarial loss (gain) included assumption updates, plan experience and our strategic realignment initiatives. Refer to Note 18.
3 Settlements and curtailments were primarily related to our strategic realignment initiatives. Refer to Note 18.
96

 
Pension Benefits  
 
Other Benefits  
Year Ended December 31,2018
 2017
 2018
 2017
Benefit obligation at beginning of year1
$9,455
 $9,428
 $782
 $962
Service cost124
 197
 11
 17
Interest cost294
 306
 23
 29
Foreign currency exchange rate changes(110) 150
 (5) 4
Amendments1
 1
 (8) (21)
Net actuarial loss (gain)(469) 420
 (33) (28)
Benefits paid2
(356) (341) (70) (71)
Business combinations3
60
 
 1
 
Divestitures(11) (7) 
 (66)
Settlements4
(932) (832) 
 
Curtailments4
(63) (10) 
 (48)
Special termination benefits4
7
 106
 
 
Other4
 37
 7
 4
Benefit obligation at end of year1
$8,004
 $9,455
 $708
 $782
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year$8,843
 $8,371
 $288
 $255
Actual return on plan assets(271) 1,139
 (5) 31
Employer contributions107
 181
 
 
Foreign currency exchange rate changes(128) 196
 
 
Benefits paid(285) (285) (3) (3)
Business combinations3
30
 
 
 
Divestitures(1) 
 
 
Settlements4
(892) (794) 
 
Other6
 35
 9
 5
Fair value of plan assets at end of year$7,409
 $8,843
 $289
 $288
Net liability recognized$(595) $(612) $(419) $(494)

1
For pension benefit plans, the benefit obligation is the projected benefit obligation. For other benefit plans, the benefit obligation is the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation. The accumulated benefit obligation for our pension plans was $7,856 million and $9,175 million as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
2
Benefits paid to pension plan participants during 2018 and 2017 included $71 million and $56 million, respectively, in payments related to unfunded pension plans that were paid from Company assets. Benefits paid to participants of other benefit plans during 2018 and 2017 included $67 million and $68 million, respectively, that were paid from Company assets.
3
Business combinations primarily related to the acquisition of a controlling interest in the Philippine bottling operations. Refer to Note 2.
4
Settlements, curtailments and special termination benefits were primarily related to productivity, integration and restructuring initiatives and the refranchising of our North America bottling operations. Refer to Note 2 and Note 19.
Pension and other postretirement benefit plan amounts recognized in our consolidated balance sheets arewere as follows (in millions):
 
Pension Benefits  
 
Other Benefits  
December 31,2018
 2017
 2018
 2017
Other assets$803
 $921
 $
 $
Accounts payable and accrued expenses(70) (72) (21) (21)
Other liabilities(1,328) (1,461) (398) (473)
Net liability recognized$(595) $(612) $(419) $(494)




Pension PlansOther Postretirement Benefit Plans
December 31,2021202020212020
Other noncurrent assets$1,545 $1,151 $ $— 
Accounts payable and accrued expenses(70)(116)(18)(19)
Other noncurrent liabilities(1,150)(1,810)(259)(354)
Net asset (liability) recognized$325 $(775)$(277)$(373)
Certain of our pension plans have a projected benefit obligationsobligation in excess of the fair value of plan assets. For these plans, the projected benefit obligationsobligation and the fair value of plan assets were as follows (in millions):
December 31,2018
 2017
December 31,20212020
Projected benefit obligations$6,561
 $7,833
Projected benefit obligationProjected benefit obligation$6,862 $7,722 
Fair value of plan assets5,163
 6,330
Fair value of plan assets5,641 5,796 
Certain of our pension plans have an accumulated benefit obligationsobligation in excess of the fair value of plan assets. For these plans, the accumulated benefit obligationsobligation and the fair value of plan assets were as follows (in millions):
December 31,20212020
Accumulated benefit obligation$6,689 $7,553 
Fair value of plan assets5,584 5,745 
December 31,2018
 2017
Accumulated benefit obligations$6,450
 $7,614
Fair value of plan assets5,157
 6,305
All of our other postretirement benefit plans have an accumulated postretirement benefit obligation in excess of the fair value of plan assets.
Pension Plan Assets
The following table presents total assets by asset class for our U.S. and non-U.S. pension plans (in millions):
U.S. Pension PlansNon-U.S. Pension Plans
December 31,2021202020212020
Cash and cash equivalents$272 $279 $233 $399 
Equity securities:
U.S.-based companies1,463 1,382 968 757 
International-based companies876 988 830 738 
Fixed-income securities:
Government bonds182 220 495 417 
Corporate bonds and debt securities899 926 124 116 
Mutual, pooled and commingled funds1
290 301 560 513 
Hedge funds/limited partnerships682 588 38 34 
Real estate381 326 8 
Derivative financial instruments(1)(1)(8)(14)
Other339 364 274 300 
Total pension plan assets2
$5,383 $5,373 $3,522 $3,266 
1 Mutual, pooled and commingled funds include investments in equity securities, fixed-income securities and combinations of both. There are a significant number of mutual, pooled and commingled funds from which investors can choose. The selection of the type of fund is dictated by the specific investment objectives and needs of a given plan. These objectives and needs vary greatly between plans.
2 Fair value disclosures related to our pension plan assets are included in Note 16. Fair value disclosures include, but are not limited to, the levels within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements in their entirety fall; a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of Level 3 assets; and information about the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure the fair value of our pension plan assets.
97

 
U.S. Plans  
 
Non-U.S. Plans  
December 31,2018
 2017
 2018
 2017
Cash and cash equivalents$310
 $454
 $153
 $237
Equity securities:       
U.S.-based companies1,116
 1,427
 644
 670
International-based companies659
 911
 462
 554
Fixed-income securities:       
Government bonds192
 183
 271
 191
Corporate bonds and debt securities745
 785
 90
 42
Mutual, pooled and commingled funds1
238
 215
 637
 766
Hedge funds/limited partnerships785
 939
 43
 44
Real estate385
 596
 6
 2
Other412
 518
 261
 309
Total pension plan assets2
$4,842
 $6,028
 $2,567
 $2,815

1
Mutual, pooled and commingled funds include investments in equity securities, fixed-income securities and combinations of both. There are a significant number of mutual, pooled and commingled funds from which investors can choose. The selection of the type of fund is dictated by the specific investment objectives and needs of a given plan. These objectives and needs vary greatly between plans.
2
Fair value disclosures related to our pension plan assets are included in Note 17. Fair value disclosures include, but are not limited to, the levels within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements in their entirety fall; a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of Level 3 assets; and information about the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure the fair value of our pension plan assets.
Investment Strategy for U.S. Pension Plans
The Company utilizes the services services of investment managers to actively manage the assets of our U.S. pension plans. We have established asset allocation targets and investment guidelines with each investment manager. Our asset allocation targets promote optimal expected return and volatility characteristics given the long-term time horizon for fulfilling the obligations of the plans. Selection of the targeted asset allocation for U.S. pension plan assets was based upon a review of the expected return and risk characteristics of each asset class, as well as the correlation of returns among asset classes. Our target allocation is a mix of 42 percent equity investments, 30 percent fixed-income investments and 28 percent alternative investments. We believe this target allocation will enable us to achieve the following long-term investment objectives:
(1)optimize the long-term return on plan assets at an acceptable level of risk;
(2)maintain a broad diversification across asset classes and among investment managers; and
(3)maintain careful control of the risk level within each asset class.
(1)optimize the long-term return on plan assets at an acceptable level of risk;
(2)maintain a broad diversification across asset classes and among investment managers; and
(3)maintain careful control of the risk level within each asset class.
The guidelines that have been established with each investment manager provide parameters within which the investment managers agree to operate, including criteria that determine eligible and ineligible securities, diversification requirements and


credit quality standards, where applicable. Unless exceptions have been approved, investment managers are prohibited from buying or selling commodities, futures or option contracts, as well as from short selling of securities. Additionally, investmentInvestment managers agree to obtain written approval for deviations from stated investment style or guidelines. As of December 31, 2018,2021, no investment manager was responsible for more than 98 percent of total U.S. pension plan assets.
Our target allocation of 42 percent equity investments is composed of 60 percent global equities, 16 percent emerging market equities and 24 percent domestic small-small-cap and mid-cap equities. Optimal returns through our investments in global equities are achieved through security selection as well as country and sector diversification. Investments in theour common stock of our Company accounted for approximately 5 percent of our total global equities and approximately 3 percent of total U.S. pension plan assets. Our investments in global equities are intended to provide diversified exposure to both U.S. and non-U.S. equity markets. Our investments in both emerging market equities and domestic small-small-cap and mid-cap equities may experience large swings in their market value. Our investments in these asset classes are selected based on capital appreciation potential.
Our target allocation of 30 percent fixed-income investments is composed of 33 percent long-duration bonds and 67 percent with multi-strategy alternative credit managers. Long-duration bonds are intended to provide a stable rate of return through investments in high-quality publicly traded debt securities. Our investments in long-duration bonds are diversified in order to mitigate duration and credit exposure. Multi-strategy alternative credit managers invest in a combination of high-yield bonds, bank loans, structured credit and emerging market debt. These investments are in lower-rated and non-rated debt securities, which generally produce higher returns compared to long-duration bonds and also help to diversify our overall fixed-income portfolio.
In addition to equity investments and fixed-income investments, we have aOur target allocation offor alternative investments is 28 percent in alternative investments.percent. These alternative investments include hedge funds, reinsurance, private equity limited partnerships, leveraged buyout funds, international venture capital partnerships and real estate. The objective of investing in alternative investments is to provide a higher rate of return than that which is typically available from publicly traded equity securities. Alternative investments are inherently illiquid and require a long-term perspective in evaluating investment performance.
Investment Strategy for Non-U.S. Pension Plans
As of December 31, 2018, theThe long-term target allocation for 6870 percent of our international subsidiaries'subsidiaries’ pension plan assets, primarily certain of our European and Canadian plans, is 65was 66 percent equity securities, 104 percent fixed-income securities and 2530 percent other investments. The actual allocation for the remaining 3230 percent of the Company'sCompany’s international subsidiaries'subsidiaries’ pension plan assets consisted of 5444 percent mutual, pooled and commingled funds; 721 percent fixed-income securities; 1 percent global equitiesequity securities and 3834 percent other investments. The investment strategies for our international subsidiaries'subsidiaries’ pension plans differvary greatly, and in some instances are influenced by local law. None of our pension plans outside the United States is individually significant for separate disclosure.
98


Other Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets
Plan assets associated with other postretirement benefits primarily represent funding of one of the U.S. postretirement benefit plans through a Voluntary Employee Beneficiary Association ("VEBA"(“VEBA”), a tax-qualified trust. The VEBA assets are primarily invested in liquid assets due to the level and timing of expected future benefit payments.


The following table presents total assets by asset class for our other postretirement benefit plans (in millions):
December 31,2018
 2017
December 31,20212020
Cash and cash equivalents$73
 $78
Cash and cash equivalents$33 $30 
Equity securities:   Equity securities:
U.S.-based companies93
 96
U.S.-based companies184 170 
International-based companies7
 8
International-based companies12 12 
Fixed-income securities:   Fixed-income securities:
Government bonds2
 2
Government bonds3 
Corporate bonds and debt securities16
 7
Corporate bonds and debt securities82 80 
Mutual, pooled and commingled funds82
 80
Mutual, pooled and commingled funds87 86 
Hedge funds/limited partnerships8
 8
Hedge funds/limited partnerships9 
Real estate4
 5
Real estate5 
Other4
 4
Other4 
Total other postretirement benefit plan assets1
$289
 $288
Total other postretirement benefit plan assets1
$419 $396 
1
1Fair value disclosures related to our other postretirement benefit plan assets are included in Note 16. Fair value disclosures include, but are not limited to, the levels within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements in their entirety fall and information about the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure the fair value of our other postretirement benefit plan assets.
Fair value disclosures related to our other postretirement benefit plan assets are included in Note 17. Fair value disclosures include, but are not limited to, the levels within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements in their entirety fall and information about the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure the fair value of our other postretirement benefit plan assets.
Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost (Income)
Net periodic benefit cost (income)or income for our pension and other postretirement benefit plans consisted of the following (in millions):
Pension PlansOther Postretirement Benefit Plans
Year Ended December 31,202120202019202120202019
Service cost$97 $112 $104 $9 $11 $
Interest cost183 235 291 15 21 28 
Expected return on plan assets1
(606)(587)(552)(17)(16)(13)
Amortization of prior service cost (credit) (4)(2)(3)(2)
Amortization of net actuarial loss2
146 171 151 4 
Net periodic benefit cost (income)(180)(66)(10)9 18 24 
Settlement charges3
117 23  — — 
Curtailment charges (credits)(1)— (1)(2)
Special termination benefits3  — — 
Other (4) — — 
Total cost (income)$(61)$(44)$(2)$8 $24 $22 
 
Pension Benefits  
 
Other Benefits  
Year Ended December 31,2018
 2017
 2016
 2018
 2017
 2016
Service cost$124
 $197
 $239
 $11
 $17
 $22
Interest cost294
 306
 319
 23
 29
 31
Expected return on plan assets1
(650) (650) (653) (13) (12) (11)
Amortization of prior service credit(3) 
 (2) (14) (18) (19)
Amortization of net actuarial loss2
128
 175
 183
 3
 8
 7
Net periodic benefit cost (income)(107) 28
 86
 10
 24
 30
Settlement charges3
240
 228
 118
 
 
 
Curtailment charges (credits)3
5
 4
 
 (4) (79) 
Special termination benefits3
7
 106
 37
 
 
 1
Other
 1
 (3) (1) 
 23
Total cost (income) recognized in
   consolidated statements of income
$145
 $367
 $238
 $5
 $(55) $54
1The Company has elected to use the actual fair value of plan assets as the market-related value of assets in the determination of the expected return on plan assets.
1
2Actuarial gains and losses are amortized using a corridor approach. The gain/loss corridor is equal to 10 percent of the greater of the benefit obligation and the market-related value of assets. Gains and losses in excess of the corridor are generally amortized over the average future working lifetime of the plan participants.
3Settlement charges were primarily related to our strategic realignment initiatives. Refer to Note 18.
The Company has elected to use the actual fair value of plan assets as the market-related value of assets in the determination of the expected return on plan assets.
2
Actuarial gains and losses are amortized using a corridor approach. The gain/loss corridor is equal to 10 percent of the greater of the benefit obligation and the market-related value of assets. Gains and losses in excess of the corridor are generally amortized over the average future working lifetime of the plan participants.
3
Settlements, curtailments and special termination benefits were primarily related to productivity, integration and restructuring initiatives and the refranchising of our North America bottling operations. Refer to Note 2 and Note 19.
All of the amounts in the tablestable above, other than service cost, were recorded in the line item other income (loss) — net in our consolidated statements of income.

99



Impact on Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
The following table sets forth the pretax changes in AOCI for our pension and other postretirement benefit plans (in millions, pretax)millions):
Pension PlansOther Postretirement Benefit Plans
Year Ended December 31,2021202020212020
Balance in AOCI at beginning of year$(3,012)$(2,678)$(47)$(59)
Recognized prior service cost (credit)1 

(2)(3)
Recognized net actuarial loss261 1195 23 11 
Prior service credit (cost) occurring during the year (3)13 — 
Net actuarial (loss) gain occurring during the year623 (488)327 
Net foreign currency translation adjustments2 (41)2 (3)
Balance in AOCI at end of year$(2,125)$(3,012)$(4)$(47)
 
Pension Benefits  
 
Other Benefits  
 
Year Ended December 31,2018
 2017
 2018
 2017
 
Balance in AOCI at beginning of year$(2,493) $(2,932) $(26) $(48) 
Recognized prior service cost (credit)1
1 
4
 (18)
4 
(54)
5 
Recognized net actuarial loss (gain)369
2 
403
3 
3
 (36)
5 
Prior service credit (cost) occurring during the year(1) (1) 8
 21
 
Net actuarial (loss) gain occurring during the year(389)
1 
75
 15
 92
5 
Impact of divestitures4
 
 
 
 
Foreign currency translation gain (loss)27
 (42) 3
 (1) 
Balance in AOCI at end of year$(2,482) $(2,493) $(15) $(26) 
1
Includes $4 million of recognized prior service cost and $63 million of actuarial gains occurring during the year due to the impact of curtailments.
2
Includes $240 million of recognized net actuarial losses due to the impact of settlements.
3
Includes $228 million of recognized net actuarial losses due to the impact of settlements.
4
Includes $4 million of recognized prior service credit due to the impact of curtailments.
5 1    Includes $36 million of recognized prior service credit, $43$117 million of recognized net actuarial gains and $45loss due to the impact of settlements, which were primarily related to our strategic realignment initiatives. Refer to Note 18.
2    Includes $23 million of recognized net actuarial gainsloss due to the impact of settlements, which were primarily related to our strategic realignment initiatives. Refer to Note 18.
3    Includes $15 million of net actuarial loss occurring during the year due to the impact of curtailments.
The following table sets forth the pretax amounts in AOCI for our pension and other postretirement benefit plans (in millions, pretax)millions):
 
Pension Benefits  
 
Other Benefits  
December 31,2018
 2017
 2018
 2017
Prior service credit (cost)$(12) $(10) $29
 $36
Net actuarial loss(2,470) (2,483) (44) (62)
Balance in AOCI at end of year$(2,482) $(2,493) $(15) $(26)
Amounts in AOCI expected to be recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost in 2019 are as follows (in millions, pretax):
 Pension Benefits Other Benefits
Amortization of prior service credit$(4) $(2)
Amortization of net actuarial loss152
 2
Total$148
 $
Pension PlansOther Postretirement Benefit Plans
December 31,2021202020212020
Prior service credit (cost)$(9)$(10)$28 $17 
Net actuarial loss(2,116)(3,002)(32)(64)
Balance in AOCI at end of year$(2,125)$(3,012)$(4)$(47)
Assumptions
Certain weighted-average assumptions used in computing the benefit obligations arefor our pension and other postretirement benefit plans were as follows:
Pension Benefits  
 
Other Benefits  
Pension PlansOther Postretirement Benefit Plans
December 31,2018
 2017
 2018
 2017
December 31,2021202020212020
Discount rate4.00% 3.50% 4.25% 3.50%Discount rate3.00 %2.50 %3.25 %2.75 %
Interest crediting rateInterest crediting rate3.00 %3.00 %N/AN/A
Rate of increase in compensation levels3.75% 3.50% N/A
 N/A
Rate of increase in compensation levels3.75 %3.75 %N/AN/A
Certain weighted-average assumptions used in computing net periodic benefit cost areor income were as follows:
Pension Benefits  
 
Other Benefits  
Pension PlansOther Postretirement Benefit Plans
Year Ended December 31,2018
 2017
 2016
 2018
 2017
 2016
Year Ended December 31,202120202019202120202019
Discount rate3.50% 4.00% 4.25% 3.50% 4.00% 4.25%Discount rate2.50 %3.25 %4.00 %2.75 %3.50 %4.25 %
Interest crediting rateInterest crediting rate3.00 %3.50 %3.75 %N/AN/A
Rate of increase in compensation levels3.50% 3.75% 3.50% N/A
 N/A
 N/A
Rate of increase in compensation levels3.75 %3.75 %3.75 %N/AN/A
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets8.00% 8.00% 8.25% 4.50% 4.75% 4.75%Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets7.25 %7.50 %7.75 %4.25 %4.50 %4.50 %
The discount rate assumptions used to account for pension and other postretirement benefit plans reflect the rates at which the benefit obligations could be effectively settled. Rates for U.S. and certain non-U.S. plans at December 31, 20182021 were determined using a cash flow matching technique whereby the rates of a yield curve, developed from high-quality debt securities, were applied to the benefit obligations to determine the appropriate discount rate. For other non-U.S. plans, we base the discount rate assumption on comparable indices within each of the countries. The Company measures the service cost and interest cost components of net periodic benefit cost or income for pension and other postretirement benefit plans by applying the specific spot rates along the yield curve to the plans'plans’ projected cash flows. The rate of compensation increase assumption is determined by the Company based upon annual reviews.
100


The current cash balance interest crediting rate for the primary U.S. pension plan is the yield on six-month U.S. Treasury bills on the last day of September of the previous plan year, plus 150 basis points. The Company assumes that the current cash balance interest crediting rate will grow linearly over 10 years to the ultimate interest crediting rate assumption.
The expected long-term rate of return assumption for U.S. pension plan assets is based upon the target asset allocation and is determined using forward-looking assumptions in the context of historical returns and volatilities for each asset class, as well as correlations among asset classes. We evaluate the rate of return assumption on an annual basis. The expected long-term rate of return assumption used in computing 20182021 net periodic pension costbenefit income for the U.S. pension plans was 8.007.25 percent. As of December 31, 2018,2021, the 5-year, 10-year and 15-year annualized return on plan assets for the primary U.S. plan was 5.510.7 percent, 9.29.7 percent and 6.46.8 percent, respectively. The annualized return since inception was 10.310.6 percent.
The assumedweighted-average assumptions for health care cost trend rates arewere as follows:
December 31,2018
 2017
December 31,20212020
Health care cost trend rate assumed for next year7.00% 7.00%Health care cost trend rate assumed for next year6.75 %6.75 %
Rate to which the cost trend rate is assumed to decline (the ultimate trend rate)5.00% 5.00%
Year that the rate reaches the ultimate trend rate2023
 2022
Rate to which the trend rate is assumed to decline (the ultimate trend rate)Rate to which the trend rate is assumed to decline (the ultimate trend rate)5.25 %5.25 %
Year that the trend rate reaches the ultimate trend rateYear that the trend rate reaches the ultimate trend rate20272025
We review external data and our own historical trends for health care costs to determine the health care cost trend rate assumptions. The Company'sCompany’s U.S. postretirement benefit plans are primarily defined dollardefined-dollar benefit plans that limit the effects of medicalhealth care inflation because the plans have established dollar limits for determining our contributions. As a result, the effect of a 1 percentage point change in the assumed health care cost trend rate would not be significant to the Company.
Cash Flows
Our estimated futureThe expected benefit payments for fundedour pension and unfundedother postretirement benefit plans for the 10 years succeeding December 31, 2021 are as follows (in millions):
Year Ended December 31,202220232024202520262027-2031
Benefit payments for pension plans$486 $454 $464 $470 $471 $2,390 
Benefit payments for other postretirement
   benefit plans
59 56 53 51 48 211 
Total$545 $510 $517 $521 $519 $2,601 
Year Ended December 31,2019
 2020
 2021
 2022
 2023
 2024–2028
Pension benefit payments$439
 $448
 $460
 $468
 $480
 $2,517
Other benefit payments1
62
 61
 59
 57
 55
 250
Total estimated benefit payments$501
 $509
 $519
 $525
 $535
 $2,767
1
The expected benefit payments for our other postretirement benefit plans are net of estimated federal subsidies expected to be received under the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003. Federal subsidies are estimated to be $3 million for the period 2019–2023 and $2 million for the period 2024–2028.
The Company anticipates making contributions to our pension contributionstrusts in 20192022 of $32$26 million, all of which will be allocated to our international plans. The majority of theseThese contributions are required by funding regulations or law.generally made in accordance with local laws and tax regulations.
Defined Contribution Plans
Our Company sponsors qualified defined contribution plans covering substantially all U.S. employees. Under the largest U.S. defined contribution plan, we match participants'participants’ contributions up to a maximum of 3.5 percent of compensation, subject to certain limitations. Company costs related toan IRS limit on compensation. The Company’s expense for the U.S. plans were $39totaled $32 million, $61$43 million and $82$43 million in 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, respectively. We also sponsor defined contribution plans in certain locations outside the United States. Company costs associated with thoseThe Company’s expense for these plans were $33totaled $79 million, $35$63 million and $37$64 million in 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, respectively.
Multi-Employer PensionRetirement Plans
The Company participates in various multi-employer pensionretirement plans. Multi-employer pensionretirement plans are designed to coverprovide benefits to or on behalf of employees fromof multiple employers andemployers. These plans are typically established under collective bargaining agreements. These plans allow multiple employers to pool their pension resources and realize efficiencies associated with the daily administration of the plan. Multi-employer retirement plans are generally governed by a board of trustees composed of representatives of both management and labor representatives and are generally funded through employer contributions.
The Company'sCompany’s expense for multi-employer pensionretirement plans totaled $6$1 million, $35$2 million and $41$5 million in 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, respectively. The decrease in 2018 was primarily driven by the refranchising of certain bottling territories in the United


States during 2017. The plans we currently participate in have contractual arrangements that extend into 2021.2025. If, in the future, we choose to withdraw from any of the multi-employer pensionretirement plans in which we currently participate, we would need to record the appropriate withdrawal liabilitiesliability, if any, at that time. Refer to Note 2 for additional information on North America refranchising.
101


NOTE 15: 14: INCOME TAXES
Income from continuing operations before income taxes consisted of the following (in millions):
Year Ended December 31,2018
 2017
 2016
 
United States$888
1 
$(690)
1 
$113
1 
International7,462
1 
7,432
 8,023
 
Total$8,350
 $6,742
 $8,136
 
1 Includes charges of $476 million, $2,140 million and $2,456 million related to refranchising certain bottling territories in North America in 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Refer to Note 2.
Year Ended December 31,202120202019
United States$3,538 $3,149 $3,249 
International8,887 6,600 7,537 
Total$12,425 $9,749 $10,786 
Income taxes from continuing operations consisted of the following (in millions):
United StatesState and LocalInternationalTotal
2021    
Current$243 $106 $1,378 $1,727 
Deferred229 (10)675 1894 
2020    
Current$296 $396 $1,307 $1,999 
Deferred(220)21 181 (18)
2019    
Current$508 $94 $1,479 $2,081 
Deferred(65)52 (267)(280)
 United States
 State and Local
 International
 Total
2018       
Current$591
1 
$145
 $1,337
 $2,073
Deferred(386)
1,3 
(81)
1,3 
17
1,3 
(450)
2017       
Current$5,438
2 
$121
 $1,257
 $6,816
Deferred(1,783)
2,3 
14
 513
2 
(1,256)
2016       
Current$1,147
 $113
 $1,182
 $2,442
Deferred(838)
3 
(91) 73
 (856)
1Includes thenet tax impact that resulted from changes to our original provisional estimatesexpense of the impact of the Tax Reform Act as permitted by Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 ("SAB 118").
2 Includes our reasonable estimate of the effects on our existing deferred tax balances and the one-time transition tax resulting from the Tax Reform Act that was signed into law on December 22, 2017. The provisional amount as of December 31, 2017,$195 million related to the one-time transitionchanges in tax on the mandatory deemed repatriation of prescribedlaws in certain foreign earnings was $4.6 billion of tax expense based on cumulative prescribed foreign earnings estimated at that time to be $42 billion. The provisional amount that was primarily related to the remeasurement of certain deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the rates at which they are expected to reverse in the future was a net deferred tax benefit of $1.0 billion.
3 Includes the benefit from charges related to refranchising certain bottling territories in North America. Refer to Note 2.
Income taxes from discontinued operations consisted of $87 million and $55 million of current expense and $38 million of deferred tax expense and $8 million of deferred tax benefit for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.jurisdictions.
We made income tax payments of $2,037$2,168 million, $1,904$1,268 million and $1,554$2,126 million in 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, respectively.
Our effective tax rate reflects the tax benefits of having significant operations outside the United States, which are generally taxed at rates lower than the statutory U.S. statutory rate. As a result of employment actions and capital investments made by the Company, certain tax jurisdictions provide income tax incentive grants, including Brazil, Costa Rica, Singapore and Swaziland.Eswatini. The terms of these grants expire from 20192023 to 2036. We anticipate that we will be able to extend or renew the grants in these locations. Tax incentive grants favorably impacted our income tax expense by $318$381 million, $221$317 million and $105$335 million for the years ended December 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, respectively. In addition, our effective tax rate reflects the benefits of having significant earnings generated in investments accounted for under the equity method of accounting, which are generally taxed at rates lower than the U.S. statutory rate.method.

102



A reconciliation of the statutory U.S. federal tax rate and our effective tax rate is as follows:
Year Ended December 31,202120202019
Statutory U.S. federal tax rate21.0 %21.0 %21.0 %
State and local income taxes — net of federal benefit1.1 1.1 0.9 
Earnings in jurisdictions taxed at rates different from the statutory U.S. federal tax rate2.3 10.9 31.1 6,7,8
Equity income or loss(2.0)(1.4)(1.6)
Excess tax benefits on stock-based compensation(0.5)(0.8)(0.9)
Other — net(0.8)2(0.5)4,5(3.8)9
Effective tax rate21.1 %20.3 %16.7 %
Year Ended December 31,2018

2017

2016
 
Statutory U.S. federal tax rate21.0 %
35.0 %
35.0 %
State and local income taxes — net of federal benefit1.5

1.2

1.2

Earnings in jurisdictions taxed at rates different from the statutory U.S.
   federal tax rate
1.2
1,2 
(9.7)
(17.5)
7 
Equity income or loss(2.4)
(3.4)
(3.0)
Tax Reform Act0.1
3 
53.5
4 


Excess tax benefits on stock-based compensation(1.2) (2.0) 
 
Other — net(0.8)
7.9
5,6 
3.8
8 
Effective tax rate19.4 %
82.5 %
19.5 %
1 Includes the impact of pretaxnet tax charges of $591$375 million (or a 1.53.0 percent impact on our effective tax rate) related to other-than-temporary impairments of certain of our equity method investees. Refer to Note 17.
2 Includeschanges in tax expense of $28 million on net pretax charges of $403 million (or a 1.4 percent impact on our effective tax rate) primarily related to the refranchising oflaws in certain foreign bottling operations. Refer to Note 2.
3 Includes net tax expense of $8 million (or a 0.1 percent impact on our effective tax rate) related to the finalization of our accounting related to the Tax Reform Act.
4 Includes net tax expense of $3,610 million primarily related to our reasonable estimate of the one-time transition tax resulting from the Tax Reform Act that was signed into law on December 22, 2017, partially offset by the impact of the lower rate introduced by the Tax Reform Act on our existing deferred tax balances.
5 Includes net tax expense of $1,048 million on a pretax gain of $1,037 million (or a 10.2 percent impact on our effective tax rate) related to the Southwest Transaction, in conjunction with which we obtained an equity interest in AC Bebidas. The Company accounts for its interest in AC Bebidas as an equity method investment and the net tax expense was primarily the result of the deferred tax recorded on the basis difference in this investment. Refer to Note 2.
6 Includes a $156 million net tax benefit related to the impact of manufacturing incentives and permanent book to tax adjustments.
7 Includes tax expense of $97 million related to a pretax gain of $1,323 million (or a 4.5 percent impact on our effective tax rate) related to
the deconsolidation of our German bottling operations. Refer to Note 2.
8 Includes tax expense of $157 million (or a 1.9 percent impact on our effective tax rate) primarily related tojurisdictions, amounts required to be
recorded for changes to our uncertain tax positions, including interest and penalties, in certain domestic jurisdictions.various international jurisdictions, as well as other discrete items.
The one-time transition tax is based on our total accumulated post-1986 prescribed foreign earnings and profits ("E&P") of approximately $41 billion. Most of this amount comprises unremitted foreign earnings, upon which no U.S. federal or state income tax had been accrued, because they were considered to have been indefinitely reinvested. At December 31, 2017, following enactment of the Tax Reform Act, we recorded a provisional $4.6 billion tax reflecting our best estimate of the one-time deemed repatriation tax liability as of December 31, 2017, and a $0.6 billion provisional deferred tax liability related to foreign withholding taxes and state income taxes on earnings no longer considered to be indefinitely reinvested.  
During 2018, we recorded a net tax expense from the impact of the Tax Reform Act. As permitted by SAB 118, we had recorded provisional adjustments to our reasonable estimate of the impact of the Tax Reform Act during the 2018 measurement period pursuant to our analysis of contemporaneous guidance, interpretations and data, and we have finalized that analysis based on such information available as of December 31, 2018.   As such, we recorded an additional $0.3 billion in tax for our one-time transition tax and2 Includes a tax benefit of $0.3 billion,$14 million (or a 1.5 percent impact on our effective tax rate) associated with the $834 million gain recorded upon the acquisition of the remaining ownership interest in BodyArmor. Refer to Note 2.
3 Includes net tax charges of $110 million (or a 1.1 percent impact on our effective tax rate) related to amounts required to be recorded for changes to our uncertain tax positions, including interest and penalties, in various international jurisdictions, as well as other agreed-upon audit issues.
4 Includes net tax expense of $431 million (or a 4.4 percent impact on our effective tax rate) primarily related to changes in judgment on specific tax positions due to the Opinion and amounts required to be recorded for changes to other uncertain tax positions, including interest and penalties. Also includes a reductiontax benefit of $107 million (or a 1.1 percent impact on our effective tax rate) related to changes in deferred taxesour assessment of certain valuation allowances and a net tax benefit of $135 million (or a 1.4 percent impact on our effective tax rate) related withholding taxesto domestic return to provision adjustments and state income taxesother tax items.
5 Includes a tax benefit of $40 million (or a 2.4 percent impact on our effective tax rate) associated with the $902 million gain recorded upon the acquisition of the remaining ownership interest in 2018.  We also remeasuredfairlife. Refer to Note 2.
6 Includes net tax charges of $199 million (or a 1.9 percent impact on our effective tax rate) related to amounts required to be recorded for changes to our uncertain tax positions, including interest and adjustedpenalties, in various international jurisdictions, as well as other agreed-upon audit issues.
7 Includes the impact of pretax charges of $710 million (or a 1.2 percent impact on our effective tax rate) related to the impairment of certain deferredof our equity method investees.
8 Includes a tax assetsbenefit of $199 million (or a 1.5 percent impact on our effective tax rate) recorded as a result of CCBA no longer qualifying as a discontinued operation. Refer to Note 2.
9 Includes a net tax benefit of $184 million (or a 1.7 percent impact on our effective tax rate) related to amounts required to be recorded for changes to our uncertain tax positions, including interest and liabilities basedpenalties, a tax benefit of $145 million (or a 1.4 percent impact on the rates at which they are expectedour effective tax rate) related to reversechanges in the future, which is generally 21.0 percent. This adjustment was not significant. Weour assessment of certain valuation allowances and a net tax benefit of $89 million (or a 0.8 percent impact on our effective tax rate) related to domestic return to provision adjustments as well as other agreed-upon audit issues.
As of December 31, 2021, we have not recorded incremental income taxes for any additional outside basis differences of approximately $8.1$5.1 billion in our investments in foreign subsidiaries, as these amounts continue to be indefinitely reinvested in foreign operations. Determining the amount of unrecognized deferred tax liability related to any additional outside basis differences in these entities is not practicable.
The Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income ("GILTI"(“GILTI”) provisions of the Tax Reform Act require the Company to include in its U.S. income tax return each foreign subsidiarysubsidiary’s earnings in excess of an allowable return on the foreign subsidiary'ssubsidiary’s tangible assets. An accounting policy election is available to either account for the tax effects of GILTI in the period that is subject to such taxes or to provide deferred taxes for book and tax basis differences that upon reversal may be subject to such taxes. We have elected to account for the tax effects of these provisions in the period that is subject to such tax and the impact is reflected in our full year provision.
The Company or one ofand its subsidiaries filesfile income tax returns in all applicable jurisdictions, including the U.S. federal jurisdiction, and variousU.S. state jurisdictions and foreign jurisdictions. U.S. tax authorities have completed their federal income tax examinations for all years prior to 2007. With respect


to U.S. state and local jurisdictions and countries outside the United States,foreign jurisdictions, with limited exceptions, the Company and its subsidiaries are no longer subject to income tax audits for years before 2004.prior to 2006. For U.S. federal and state tax purposes, the net operating losses and tax credit carryovers acquired in connection with our acquisition of Old CCECoca‑Cola Enterprises Inc.’s former North America business that were generated betweenfrom the years of 1990 through 2010 are subject to adjustments until the year in which they are actually utilized is no longer subject to examination. Although the outcome of tax audits is always uncertain, the Company believes that adequate amounts of tax, including interest and penalties, have been provided for any adjustments that are expected to result from those years.in accordance with the applicable accounting guidance.
103


On September 17,November 18, 2020, the Tax Court issued the Opinion regarding the Company’s 2015 the Company received a Notice fromlitigation with the IRS forinvolving transfer pricing tax adjustments in which the tax years 2007 through 2009, after a five-year audit.court predominantly sided with the IRS. The Company disagrees with the Opinion and intends to vigorously defend its position. Refer to Note 12.11.
As of December 31, 2018,2021, the gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits was $336$906 million. If the Company were to prevail on all uncertain tax positions, the net effect would be a benefit of $182$600 million, exclusive of any benefits related to interest and penalties. The remaining $154$306 million which was recorded as a deferred tax asset, primarily represents tax benefits that would be received in different tax jurisdictions in the event the Company did not prevail on all uncertain tax positions.
A reconciliation of the changes in the gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows (in millions):
Year Ended December 31,202120202019
Balance of unrecognized tax benefits at beginning of year$915 $392 $336 
Increase related to prior period tax positions9 528 1204 2
Decrease related to prior period tax positions(50)(1)— 
Increase related to current period tax positions37 26 29 
Decrease related to settlements with taxing authorities(4)(19)(174)3
Effect of foreign currency translation(1)(11)(3)
Balance of unrecognized tax benefits at end of year$906 $915 $392 
Year Ended December 31,2018
 2017
 2016
 
Beginning balance of unrecognized tax benefits$331

$302

$168

Increase related to prior period tax positions11

18

163
1 
Decrease related to prior period tax positions(2)
(13)


Increase related to current period tax positions17

13

17

Decrease related to settlements with taxing authorities(4)


(40)
1 
Increase (decrease) due to effect of foreign currency exchange rate changes(17)
11

(6)
Ending balance of unrecognized tax benefits$336

$331

$302

1 The increase was primarily related to a change in judgment on certain tax positions due to the Opinion. Refer to Note 11.
2 The increase was primarily related to a change in judgment about the Company’s tax positions with several foreign jurisdictions.
3 The decrease was primarily related to a change in judgment about one of the Company’s tax positions that became certain as a result of settlement of a matter in the United States.
1
The net increase was primarily related to a change in judgment about one of the Company's tax positions as a result of receiving notification of a preliminary settlement of a Competent Authority matter with a foreign jurisdiction, a portion of which became certain later in the year. This change in position did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated statement of income during the year ended December 31, 2016, as it was partially offset by refunds to be received from the foreign jurisdiction.
The Company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in the line item income tax expense.taxes on our consolidated statement of income. The Company had $190$453 million, $177$391 million and $142$201 million in interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits accrued as of December 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, respectively. Of these amounts, $13expense of $62 million, $35$190 million and $31$11 million of expense werewas recognized through income tax expense in 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, respectively. If the Company were to prevail on all uncertain tax positions, the reversal of this accrual would also be a benefit to the Company'sCompany’s effective tax rate.
It is expected that the amount of unrecognized tax benefits will change in the next 12 months; however, we do not expect the change toany changes will have a significant impact on our consolidated statement of income or consolidated balance sheet. These changes may be the result of settlements of ongoing audits, statute of limitations expiring or final settlements in transfer pricing matters that are the subject of litigation. At this time,Currently, an estimate of the range of the reasonably possible outcomes cannot be made.

104








The tax effects of temporary differences and carryforwards that give rise to deferred tax assets and liabilities consisted of the following (in millions):
December 31,2018
 2017
Deferred tax assets:   
Property, plant and equipment$64
 $99
Trademarks and other intangible assets2,540
2 
98
Equity method investments (including foreign currency translation adjustment)315
 300
Derivative financial instruments322
 387
Other liabilities791
 861
Benefit plans881
 977
Net operating/capital loss carryforwards318
 520
Other221
 163
Gross deferred tax assets5,452
 3,405
Valuation allowances(399) (501)
Total deferred tax assets1
$5,053
 $2,904
Deferred tax liabilities:   
Property, plant and equipment$(724) $(819)
Trademarks and other intangible assets(951) (978)
Equity method investments (including foreign currency translation adjustment)(1,707) (1,835)
Derivative financial instruments(162) (436)
Other liabilities(67) (50)
Benefit plans(255) (289)
Other(453) (688)
Total deferred tax liabilities$(4,319) $(5,095)
Net deferred tax assets (liabilities)$734
 $(2,191)
1 Noncurrent deferred tax assets of $2,667 million and $330 million were included in the line item Deferred income tax assets in our consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
2 The increase was primarily the result of a $2.9 billion cumulative effect adjustment related to our adoption of ASU 2016-16.
In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-16, which requires the Company to recognize the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory when the transfer occurs. ASU 2016-16 was effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2018 and was adopted using a modified retrospective basis. We recorded a $2.9 billion cumulative effect adjustment to increase the opening balance of reinvested earnings with the majority of the offset being recorded as a deferred tax asset. This amount is primarily related to trademarks and other intangible assets and was recorded in the line item deferred income tax assets in our consolidated balance sheet.
December 31,20212020
Deferred tax assets:  
Property, plant and equipment$36 $44 
Trademarks and other intangible assets1,910 2,214 
Equity method investments (including net foreign currency translation adjustments)595 580 
Derivative financial instruments215 523 
Other liabilities1,255 1,401 
Benefit plans670 893 
Net operating/capital loss carryforwards280 320 
Other377 391 
Gross deferred tax assets5,338 6,366 
Valuation allowances(401)(406)
Total deferred tax assets$4,937 $5,960 
Deferred tax liabilities:  
Property, plant and equipment$(721)$(837)
Trademarks and other intangible assets(1,783)(1,661)
Equity method investments (including net foreign currency translation adjustments)(1,619)(1,533)
Derivative financial instruments(500)(435)
Other liabilities(315)(402)
Benefit plans(527)(321)
Other(164)(144)
Total deferred tax liabilities$(5,629)$(5,333)
Net deferred tax assets (liabilities)$(692)$627 
As of December 31, 2018,2021 and 2020, we had net deferred tax assets of $2.0$0.7 billion and as of December 31, 2017, we had net deferred tax liabilities of $539 million$1.4 billion, respectively, located in countries outside the United States.
As of December 31, 2018,2021, we had $2,906$2,313 million of loss carryforwards available to reduce future taxable income. Loss carryforwards of $372$849 million must be utilized within the next five years, and the remainder can be utilized over a period greater than five years.
An analysis of our deferred tax asset valuation allowances is as follows (in millions):
Year Ended December 31,2018
 2017
 2016
Year Ended December 31,202120202019
Balance at beginning of year$501
 $530
 $477
Balance at beginning of year$406 $303 $419 
Additions81
 184
 68
Additions25 240 148 
Decrease due to reclassification to assets held for sale
 
 (9)
Deductions(183) (213) (6)Deductions(30)(137)(264)
Balance at end of year$399
 $501
 $530
Balance at end of year$401 $406 $303 
The Company'sCompany’s deferred tax asset valuation allowances are primarily the result of uncertainties regarding the future realization of recorded tax benefits on tax loss carryforwards and foreign tax credit carryforwards from operations in various jurisdictions.jurisdictions and basis differences in certain equity investments. Current evidence does not suggest we will realize sufficient taxable income of the appropriate character within the carryforward period to allow us to realize these


deferred tax benefits. If we were to identify and implement tax planning strategies to recover these deferred tax assets or generate sufficient income of the appropriate character in these jurisdictions in the future, it could lead to the reversal of these valuation allowances and a reduction of income tax expense. The Company believes that it will generate sufficient future taxable income to realize the tax benefits related to the remaining net deferred tax assets in our consolidated balance sheet.
In 2018,2021, the Company recognized a net decrease of $102$5 million in its valuation allowances. ThisThe decrease was primarily due to net decreases in the deferred tax assets and related valuation allowances on certain equity investments and the changes in net operating losses in the normal course of business.
105


In 2020, the Company recognized a net increase of $103 million in its valuation allowances. The increase was primarily due to net increases in the deferred tax assets and related valuation allowances on certain equity investments. In addition,The increase was also due to the changes inincrease of valuation allowances after considering significant negative evidence on the utilization of certain net operating losses in the normal course of business contributed to the net decrease in valuation allowance. The decreases were partially offset by an increase due to the acquisition of a controlling interest in one of ourand excess foreign bottling operations.tax credits.
In 2017,2019, the Company recognized a net decrease of $29$116 million in its valuation allowances. This decrease was primarily due to the reversal of a valuation allowance after considering significant positive evidence on the utilization of certain net operating losses. This decrease was also due to the reversal of a valuation allowance in a foreign jurisdictionour U.S. operations related to expenses incurred in the normal course of business that were previously determined to be non-deductible. In addition,nondeductible and the decreasechanges in value of certain deferred tax assets and related valuation allowance due to the reductionnet operating losses in the U.S. corporate tax rate and changes to deferred tax assets and related valuation allowances on certain equity investments contributed to the netnormal course of business. The decrease in the valuation allowance. The decreases werewas partially offset by an increase in the valuation allowance due to increases in the deferred tax assetassets and related valuation allowances on certain equity method investments and recognizing a valuation allowance on deferred tax assets related to net operating losses at certain foreign bottling operations after considering recent negative evidence as to the realizability of those deferred tax assets.
In 2016, the Company recognized a netan increase of $53 million in its valuation allowances. This increase was primarily due to the increase in non-deductible expenses incurred during the normal courseacquisition of businessforeign operations.
NOTE 16: 15: OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
AOCI attributable to shareowners of The Coca-Cola Company is separately presented in our consolidated balance sheetssheet as a component of The Coca-Cola Company's shareowners'Company’s shareowners’ equity, which also includes our proportionate share of equity method investees'investees’ AOCI. OCI attributable to noncontrolling interests is allocated to, and included in, our consolidated balance sheetssheet as part of the line item equity attributable to noncontrolling interests.
AOCI attributable to shareowners of The Coca-Cola Company consisted of the following, net of tax (in millions):
December 31,2018
 2017
Foreign currency translation adjustments$(11,045) $(8,957)
Accumulated derivative net gains (losses)(126) (119)
Unrealized net gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities1
50
 493
Adjustments to pension and other benefit liabilities(1,693) (1,722)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)$(12,814) $(10,305)
1The change in the balance from December 31, 2017 includes the $409 million reclassification to reinvested earnings upon the adoption of
ASU 2016-01. Refer to Note 1 and Note 4.






December 31,20212020
Net foreign currency translation adjustments$(12,595)$(12,028)
Accumulated net gains (losses) on derivatives20 (194)
Unrealized net gains (losses) on available-for-sale debt securities(62)28 
Adjustments to pension and other postretirement benefit liabilities(1,693)(2,407)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)$(14,330)$(14,601)
The following table summarizes the allocation of total comprehensive income between shareowners of The Coca-Cola Company and noncontrolling interests (in millions):
Year Ended December 31, 2021
Shareowners of
The Coca-Cola Company
Noncontrolling
Interests
Total
Consolidated net income$9,771 $33 $9,804 
Other comprehensive income:
Net foreign currency translation adjustments(567)(132)(699)
Net gains (losses) on derivatives1
214 — 214 
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale debt
   securities2
(90)— (90)
Net change in pension and other postretirement benefit liabilities3
714 (2)712 
Total comprehensive income$10,042 $(101)$9,941 
1 Refer to Note 5 for additional information related to the net gains or losses on derivative instruments.
2 Refer to Note 4 for additional information related to the net unrealized gains or losses on available-for-sale debt securities.
3 Refer to Note 13 for additional information related to the Company’s pension and other postretirement benefit liabilities.
106


 Year Ended December 31, 2018
 
Shareowners of
The Coca-Cola Company

Noncontrolling
Interests

Total
Consolidated net income$6,434
$42
$6,476
Other comprehensive income:   
Net foreign currency translation adjustments(2,088)53
(2,035)
Net gains (losses) on derivatives1
(7)
(7)
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale debt
   securities2
(34)
(34)
Net change in pension and other benefit liabilities3
29

29
Total comprehensive income$4,334
$95
$4,429
1
Refer to Note 6 for additional information related to the net gains or losses on derivative instruments designated and qualifying as cash flow hedging instruments.
2
Refer to Note 4 for additional information related to the net unrealized gains or losses on available-for-sale debt securities.
3
Refer to Note 14 for additional information related to the Company's pension and other postretirement benefit liabilities.
The following tables present OCI attributable to shareowners of The Coca-Cola Company, including our proportionate share of equity method investees'investees’ OCI for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 is as follows (in millions):
Before-Tax AmountIncome TaxAfter-Tax Amount
2021
Foreign currency translation adjustments:
Translation adjustments arising during the year$263 $19 $282 
Reclassification adjustments recognized in net income257  257 
Gains (losses) on intra-entity transactions that are of a long-term investment nature(1,798) (1,798)
Gains (losses) on net investment hedges arising during the year1
918 (230)688 
Reclassification adjustments for net investment hedges recognized in net income1
4  4 
     Net foreign currency translation adjustments$(356)$(211)$(567)
Derivatives:
Gains (losses) arising during the year$160 $(41)$119 
Reclassification adjustments recognized in net income124 (29)95 
Net gains (losses) on derivatives1
$284 $(70)$214 
Available-for-sale debt securities:
Unrealized gains (losses) arising during the year$(141)$48 $(93)
Reclassification adjustments recognized in net income4 (1)3 
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale debt securities2
$(137)$47 $(90)
Pension and other postretirement benefit liabilities:
Net pension and other postretirement benefit liabilities arising during the year$653 $(138)$515 
Reclassification adjustments recognized in net income265 (66)199 
Net change in pension and other postretirement benefit liabilities3
$918 $(204)$714 
Other comprehensive income (loss) attributable to shareowners of The Coca-Cola
   Company
$709 $(438)$271 
2020
Foreign currency translation adjustments:
Translation adjustments arising during the year$(2,223)$150 $(2,073)
Reclassification adjustments recognized in net income— 
Gains (losses) on intra-entity transactions that are of a long-term investment nature2,133 — 2,133 
Gains (losses) on net investment hedges arising during the year1
(1,094)273 (821)
     Net foreign currency translation adjustments$(1,181)$423 $(758)
Derivatives:
Gains (losses) arising during the year$(54)$13 $(41)
Reclassification adjustments recognized in net income74 (18)56 
Net gains (losses) on derivatives1
$20 $(5)$15 
Available-for-sale debt securities:
Unrealized gains (losses) arising during the year$(64)$22 $(42)
Reclassification adjustments recognized in net income(7)(5)
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale debt securities2
$(71)$24 $(47)
Pension and other postretirement benefit liabilities:
Net pension and other postretirement benefit liabilities arising during the year$(560)$138 $(422)
Reclassification adjustments recognized in net income206 (51)155 
Net change in pension and other postretirement benefit liabilities3
$(354)$87 $(267)
Other comprehensive income (loss) attributable to shareowners of The Coca-Cola
   Company
$(1,586)$529 $(1,057)
107


 Before-Tax Amount
 Income Tax
 After-Tax Amount
2018     
Foreign currency translation adjustments:     
Translation adjustments arising during the year$(1,728) $59
 $(1,669)
Reclassification adjustments recognized in net income398
 
 398
Gains (losses) on intra-entity transactions that are of a long-term investment nature(1,296) 
 (1,296)
Gains (losses) on net investment hedges arising during the year1
639
 (160) 479
     Net foreign currency translation adjustments$(1,987) $(101) $(2,088)
Derivatives:     
Gains (losses) arising during the year59
 (16) 43
Reclassification adjustments recognized in net income(68) 18
 (50)
Net gains (losses) on derivatives1
$(9) $2
 $(7)
Available-for-sale debt securities:     
Unrealized gains (losses) arising during the year(50) 11
 (39)
Reclassification adjustments recognized in net income5
 
 5
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale debt securities2
$(45) $11
 $(34)
Pension and other benefit liabilities:     
Net pension and other benefit liabilities arising during the year(299) 75
 (224)
Reclassification adjustments recognized in net income341
 (88) 253
Net change in pension and other benefit liabilities3
$42
 $(13) $29
Other comprehensive income (loss) attributable to shareowners of The Coca-Cola
   Company
$(1,999) $(101) $(2,100)
1
Refer to Note 6 for additional information related to the net gains or losses on derivative instruments designated and qualifying as cash flow hedging instruments.
2
Refer to Note 4 for additional information related to the net unrealized gains or losses on available-for-sale debt securities.
3
Refer to Note 14 for additional information related to the Company's pension and other postretirement benefit liabilities.

Before-Tax AmountIncome TaxAfter-Tax Amount
2019
Foreign currency translation adjustments:
Translation adjustments arising during the year$52 $(54)$(2)
Reclassification adjustments recognized in net income192 — 192 
Gains (losses) on intra-entity transactions that are of a long-term investment nature(307)— (307)
Gains (losses) on net investment hedges arising during the year1
195 (49)146 
     Net foreign currency translation adjustments$132 $(103)$29 
Derivatives:
Gains (losses) arising during the year$(225)$49 $(176)
Reclassification adjustments recognized in net income163 (41)122 
Net gains (losses) on derivatives1
$(62)$$(54)
Available-for-sale debt securities:
Unrealized gains (losses) arising during the year$47 $(4)$43 
Reclassification adjustments recognized in net income(31)(25)
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale debt securities2
$16 $$18 
Pension and other postretirement benefit liabilities:
Net pension and other postretirement benefit liabilities arising during the year$(379)$105 $(274)
Reclassification adjustments recognized in net income151 (36)115 
Net change in pension and other postretirement benefit liabilities3
$(228)$69 $(159)
Other comprehensive income (loss) attributable to shareowners of The Coca-Cola
   Company
$(142)$(24)$(166)

1Refer to Note 5 for additional information related to the net gains or losses on derivative instruments.

2Refer to Note 4 for additional information related to the net unrealized gains or losses on available-for-sale debt securities.

3Refer to Note 13 for additional information related to the Company’s pension and other postretirement benefit liabilities.
108
 Before-Tax Amount
 Income Tax
 After-Tax Amount
2017     
Foreign currency translation adjustments:     
Translation adjustments arising during the year$(1,350) $(242) $(1,592)
Reclassification adjustments recognized in net income23
 (6) 17
Gains (losses) on intra-entity transactions that are of a long-term investment nature3,332
 
 3,332
Gains (losses) on net investment hedges arising during the year1
(1,512) 578
 (934)
     Net foreign currency translation adjustments$493
 $330
 $823
Derivatives:     
Gains (losses) arising during the year(184) 65
 (119)
Reclassification adjustments recognized in net income(506) 192
 (314)
Net gains (losses) on derivatives1
$(690) $257
 $(433)
Available-for-sale securities:     
Unrealized gains (losses) arising during the year405
 (136) 269
Reclassification adjustments recognized in net income(123) 42
 (81)
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities2
$282
 $(94) $188
Pension and other benefit liabilities:     
Net pension and other benefit liabilities arising during the year120
 (7) 113
Reclassification adjustments recognized in net income325
 (116) 209
Net change in pension and other benefit liabilities3
$445
 $(123) $322
Other comprehensive income (loss) attributable to shareowners of The Coca-Cola
   Company
$530
 $370
 $900
1
Refer to Note 6 for additional information related to the net gains or losses on derivative instruments designated and qualifying as cash flow hedging instruments.
2
Refer to Note 4 for additional information related to the net unrealized gains or losses on available-for-sale securities.
3
Refer to Note 14 for additional information related to the Company's pension and other postretirement benefit liabilities.










 Before-Tax Amount
 Income Tax
 After-Tax Amount
2016     
Foreign currency translation adjustments:     
Translation adjustments arising during the year$(1,103) $51
 $(1,052)
Reclassification adjustments recognized in net income368
 (18) 350
Gains (losses) on net investment hedges arising during the year67
 (25) 42
Reclassification adjustments for net investment hedges recognized in net income77
 (30) 47
     Net foreign currency translation adjustments$(591) $(22) $(613)
Derivatives:     
Gains (losses) arising during the year(43) 11
 (32)
Reclassification adjustments recognized in net income(563) 213
 (350)
Net gains (losses) on derivatives1
$(606) $224
 $(382)
Available-for-sale securities:     
Unrealized gains (losses) arising during the year124
 (28) 96
Reclassification adjustments recognized in net income(105) 26
 (79)
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities2
$19
 $(2) $17
Pension and other benefit liabilities:     
Net pension and other benefit liabilities arising during the year(374) 99
 (275)
Reclassification adjustments recognized in net income342
 (120) 222
Net change in pension and other benefit liabilities3
$(32) $(21) $(53)
Other comprehensive income (loss) attributable to shareowners of The Coca-Cola
   Company
$(1,210) $179
 $(1,031)
1
Refer to Note 6 for additional information related to the net gains or losses on derivative instruments designated and qualifying as cash flow hedging instruments.
2
Refer to Note 4 for additional information related to the net unrealized gains or losses on available-for-sale securities.
3
Refer to Note 14 for additional information related to the Company's pension and other postretirement benefit liabilities.





















The following table presents the amounts and line items in our consolidated statement of income where adjustments reclassified from AOCI into income were recorded during the year ended December 31, 20182021 (in millions):
Description of AOCI ComponentFinancial Statement Line ItemAmount Reclassified from AOCI into Income
Foreign currency translation adjustments:  
Divestitures, deconsolidations and other1,2
Other income (loss) — net$398
 Income from continuing operations before income taxes$398
 Income taxes from continuing operations
 Consolidated net income$398
Derivatives:  
Foreign currency contractsNet operating revenues$(137)
Foreign currency contractsCost of goods sold(8)
Foreign currency contractsOther income (loss) — net9
Divestitures, deconsolidations and otherOther income (loss) — net3
Foreign currency and interest rate contractsInterest expense57
 Income from continuing operations before income taxes$(76)
 Income taxes from continuing operations20
 Net income from continuing operations$(56)
Foreign currency and commodity contractsIncome from discontinued operations (net of income taxes)$6
 Consolidated net income$(50)
Available-for-sale securities:  
Sale of securitiesOther income (loss) — net$5
 Income from continuing operations before income taxes$5
 Income taxes from continuing operations
 Consolidated net income$5
Pension and other benefit liabilities:  
Settlement charges3
Other income (loss) — net$240
Curtailment charges3
Other income (loss) — net1
Recognized net actuarial lossOther income (loss) — net131
Recognized prior service cost (credit)Other income (loss) — net(17)
Divestitures, deconsolidations and other2
Other income (loss) — net(14)
 Income from continuing operations before income taxes$341
 Income taxes from continuing operations(88)
 Consolidated net income$253
Description of AOCI ComponentFinancial Statement Line ItemAmount Reclassified from AOCI into Income
Foreign currency translation adjustments:
Divestitures, deconsolidations and other1
Primarily related to the reversalOther income (loss) — net$261 
Income before income taxes261 
Income taxes— 
Consolidated net income$261 
Derivatives:
Foreign currency contractsNet operating revenues$77 
Foreign currency and commodity contractsCost of the cumulative translation adjustments resulting from the substantial liquidationgoods sold10 
Foreign currency contractsOther income (loss) — net(74)
Divestitures, deconsolidations and other1
Other income (loss) — net
Foreign currency and interest rate contractsInterest expense103 
Income before income taxes124 
Income taxes(29)
Consolidated net income$95 
Available-for-sale debt securities:
Sale of the Company's former Russian juice operations,debt securitiesOther income (loss) — net$
Income before income taxes
Income taxes(1)
Consolidated net income$
Pension and the deconsolidation of our Canadian bottling operations.other postretirement benefit liabilities:
Settlement charges2
Primarily related to our previously held equity method investment in the Philippine bottling operations and the refranchising of our Latin American bottling operations.Other income (loss) — net
$117 
3Curtailment charges (credits)2
The settlementOther income (loss) — net(2)
Recognized net actuarial lossOther income (loss) — net150 
Recognized prior service cost (credit)Other income (loss) — net(2)
Divestitures, deconsolidations and curtailment charges were primarily related to productivity, restructuring and integration initiatives and the refranchising of our North America bottling operations. Refer to Note 14 and Note 19.other1
Other income (loss) — net
Income before income taxes265 
Income taxes(66)
Consolidated net income$199 


1 Refer to Note 2.
2 The settlement charges and curtailment credits were related to our strategic realignment initiatives. Refer to Note 13 and Note 18.
NOTE 17: 16: FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
U.S. GAAP defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Additionally, the inputs used to measure fair value are prioritized based on a three-level hierarchy. This hierarchy requires entities to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The three levels of inputs used to measure fair value are as follows:
Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 — Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1. We value assets and liabilities included in this level using dealer and broker quotations, certain pricing models, bid prices, quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.
Level 3 — Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. This includes certain pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies and similar techniques that use significant unobservable inputs.
109


Recurring Fair Value Measurements
In accordance with U.S. GAAP, certain assets and liabilities are required to be recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. For our Company, the only assets and liabilities that are adjusted to fair value on a recurring basis are investments in equity securities with readily determinable fair values, debt securities classified as trading or available-for-sale, and derivative financial instruments.instruments and our contingent consideration liability. Additionally, the Company adjusts the carrying value of certain long-term debt as a result of the Company'sCompany’s fair value hedging strategy.
Investments in Debt and Equity Securities
The fair values of our investments in debt and equity securities using quoted market prices from daily exchange traded markets are based on the closing price as of the balance sheet date and are classified as Level 1. The fair values of our investments in debt and equity securities classified as Level 2 are priced using quoted market prices for similar instruments or nonbinding market prices that are corroborated by observable market data. Inputs into these valuation techniques include actual trade data, benchmark yields, broker/dealer quotes and other similar data. These inputs are obtained from quoted market prices, independent pricing vendors or other sources.
Derivative Financial Instruments
The fair values of our futures contracts are primarily determined using quoted contract prices on futures exchange markets. The fair values of these instruments are based on the closing contract priceprices as of the balance sheet date and are classified as Level 1.
The fair values of our derivative instruments other than futures are determined using standard valuation models. The significant inputs used in these models are readily available in public markets, or can be derived from observable market transactions, and therefore have been classified as Level 2. Inputs used in these standard valuation models for derivative instruments other than futures include the applicable exchange rates, forward rates, interest rates, discount rates and commodity prices. The standard valuation model for options also uses implied volatility as an additional input. The discount rates are based on the historical U.S. Deposit or U.S. Treasury rates, and the implied volatility specific to options is based on quoted rates from financial institutions.
Included in the fair valuevalues of derivative instruments is an adjustment for nonperformance risk. The adjustment is based on current credit default swap ("CDS"(“CDS”) rates applied to each contract, by counterparty. We use our counterparty'scounterparty’s CDS rate when we are in an asset position and our own CDS rate when we are in a liability position. The adjustment for nonperformance risk did not have a significant impact on the estimated fair values of our derivative instruments.


The following tables summarize those assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis (in millions):
December 31, 2021
Level 1Level 2Level 3
Other3
Netting
Adjustment
4Fair Value
Measurements
Assets:     
Equity securities with readily determinable values1
$2,372 $230 $17 $104 $— $2,723 
Debt securities1
— 1,556 33 — — 1,589 
Derivatives2
69 588 — — (459)6198 8
Total assets$2,441 $2,374 $50 $104 $(459)$4,510 
Liabilities:     
Contingent consideration liability$— $— $590 5$— $— $590 
Derivatives2
— 96 — — (82)714 8
Total liabilities$— $96 $590 $— $(82)$604 
1Refer to Note 4 for additional information related to the composition of our equity securities with readily determinable values and debt securities.
2Refer to Note 5 for additional information related to the composition of our derivative portfolio.
3Certain investments that are measured at fair value using the net asset value per share (or its equivalent) practical expedient have not been categorized in the fair value hierarchy but are included to reconcile to the amounts presented in Note 4.
4Amounts represent the impact of legally enforceable master netting agreements that allow the Company to settle net positive and negative positions and also cash collateral held or placed with the same counterparties. There are no amounts subject to legally enforceable master netting agreements that management has chosen not to offset or that do not meet the offsetting requirements. Refer to Note 5.
5Refer to Note 2 for additional information related to the contingent consideration liability resulting from the fairlife acquisition.
6The Company is obligated to return $331 million in cash collateral it has netted against its derivative position.
110


 December 31, 2018 
 Level 1
 Level 2
 Level 3
 Other
3 
Netting
Adjustment

4 
Fair Value
Measurements

 
Assets:            
Equity securities with readily determinable values1
$1,681
 $186
 $6
 $61
 $
 $1,934
 
Debt securities1

 5,018
 19
 
 
 5,037
 
     Derivatives2
2
 313
 
 
 (261)
5 
54
7 
Total assets$1,683
 $5,517
 $25
 $61
 $(261) $7,025
 
Liabilities:            
    Derivatives2
$(14) $(221) $
 $
 $182
6 
$(53)
7 
Total liabilities$(14) $(221) $
 $
 $182
 $(53) 
1
Refer to Note 4 for additional information related to the composition of our equity securities with readily determinable values and debt securities.
2
Refer to Note 6 for additional information related to the composition of our derivative portfolio.
3
Certain investments that are measured at fair value using the net asset value per share (or its equivalent) practical expedient have not been categorized in the fair value hierarchy but are included to reconcile to the amounts presented in Note 4.
4
Amounts represent the impact of legally enforceable master netting agreements that allow the Company to settle net positive and negative positions and also cash collateral held or placed with the same counterparties. There are no amounts subject to legally enforceable master netting agreements that management has chosen not to offset or that do not meet the offsetting requirements. Refer to Note 6.
5
The Company is obligated to return $96 million in cash collateral it has netted against its derivative position.
6
The Company has the right to reclaim $4 million in cash collateral it has netted against its derivative position.
7
The Company's derivative financial instruments are recorded at fair value in our consolidated balance sheet as follows: $54 million in the line item other assets; $3 million in the line item liabilities held for sale — discontinued operations and $50 million in the line item other liabilities. Refer to Note 6 for additional information related to the composition of our derivative portfolio.

7The Company does not have the right to reclaim any cash collateral it has netted against its derivative position.

8The Company’s derivative financial instruments are recorded at fair value in our consolidated balance sheet as follows: $198 million in the line item other noncurrent assets and $14 million in the line item other noncurrent liabilities. Refer to Note 5 for additional information related to the composition of our derivative portfolio.

December 31, 2020
Level 1Level 2Level 3
Other3
Netting
Adjustment
4Fair Value
Measurements
Assets:     
Equity securities with readily determinable values1
$2,049 $210 $12 $103 $— $2,374 
Debt securities1
2,267 32 — — 2,303 
Derivatives2
63 835 — — (669)6229 8
Total assets$2,116 $3,312 $44 $103 $(669)$4,906 
Liabilities:     
Contingent consideration liability$— $— $321 5$— $— $321 
Derivatives2
— 91 — — (81)710 8
Total liabilities$— $91 $321 $— $(81)$331 

1Refer to Note 4 for additional information related to the composition of our equity securities with readily determinable values and debt securities.

2Refer to Note 5 for additional information related to the composition of our derivative portfolio.

3Certain investments that are measured at fair value using the net asset value per share (or its equivalent) practical expedient have not been categorized in the fair value hierarchy but are included to reconcile to the amounts presented in Note 4.

4Amounts represent the impact of legally enforceable master netting agreements that allow the Company to settle net positive and negative positions and also cash collateral held or placed with the same counterparties. There are no amounts subject to legally enforceable master netting agreements that management has chosen not to offset or that do not meet the offsetting requirements. Refer to Note 5.

5Refer to Note 2 for additional information related to the contingent consideration liability resulting from the fairlife acquisition.

6The Company is obligated to return $546 million in cash collateral it has netted against its derivative position.

7The Company does not have the right to reclaim any cash collateral it has netted against its derivative position.

8The Company’s derivative financial instruments are recorded at fair value in our consolidated balance sheet as follows: $229 million in the line item other noncurrent assets, $9 million in the line item accounts payable and accrued expenses and $1 million in the line item other noncurrent liabilities. Refer to Note 5 for additional information related to the composition of our derivative portfolio.


 December 31, 2017 
 Level 1
 Level 2
 Level 3
 Other
4 
Netting
Adjustment

5 
Fair Value
Measurements

 
Assets:            
Trading securities1
$212
 $127
 $3
 $65
 $
 $407
 
Available-for-sale securities1
1,899
 5,739
 169
3 

 
 7,807
 
     Derivatives2
7
 250
 
 
 (198)
6 
59
8 
Total assets$2,118
 $6,116
 $172
 $65
 $(198) $8,273
 
Liabilities:            
    Derivatives2
$(3) $(262) $
 $
 $147
7 
$(118)
8 
Total liabilities$(3) $(262) $
 $
 $147
 $(118) 
1
Refer to Note 4 for additional information related to the composition of our trading securities and available-for-sale securities.
2
Refer to Note 6 for additional information related to the composition of our derivative portfolio.
3
Primarily related to debt securities that mature in 2018.
4
Certain investments that are measured at fair value using the net asset value per share (or its equivalent) practical expedient have not been categorized in the fair value hierarchy but are included to reconcile to the amounts presented in Note 4.
5
Amounts represent the impact of legally enforceable master netting agreements that allow the Company to settle net positive and negative positions and also cash collateral held or placed with the same counterparties. There are no amounts subject to legally enforceable master netting agreements that management has chosen not to offset or that do not meet the offsetting requirements. Refer to Note 6.
6
The Company is obligated to return $55 million in cash collateral it has netted against its derivative position.
7
The Company has the right to reclaim $2 million in cash collateral it has netted against its derivative position.
8
The Company's derivative financial instruments are recorded at fair value in our consolidated balance sheet as follows: $59 million in the line item other assets; $28 million in the line item accounts payable and accrued expenses; $12 million in the line item liabilities held for sale — discontinued operations and $78 million in the line item other liabilities. Refer to Note 6 for additional information related to the composition of our derivative portfolio.
Gross realized and unrealized gains and losses on Level 3 assets and liabilities were not significant for the years ended December 31, 20182021 and 2017.2020.
The Company recognizes transfers between levels within the hierarchy as of the beginning of the reporting period. Gross transfers between levels within the hierarchy were not significant for the years ended December 31, 20182021 and 2017.2020.
Nonrecurring Fair Value Measurements
In addition to assets and liabilities that are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis, the Company records assets and liabilities at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as required by U.S. GAAP. Generally, assets are recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as a result of impairment charges or as a result of observable changes in equity securities using the measurement alternative.

111















The gains and losses on assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis are summarized in the following table below (in millions):
Gains (Losses) 
Year Ended December 31,2021 2020 
Assets held for sale$(266)1$— 
Other-than-temporary impairment charges (290)3
Impairment of intangible assets(78)2(215)4
Impairment of equity investment without a readily determinable fair value (26)5
Total$(344) $(531)
 Gains (Losses)   
Year Ended December 31,2018
 2017
 
Other-than-temporary impairment charges$(591)
1 
$(50)
5 
Assets held for sale — discontinued operations
(554)
2 

 
Other long-lived assets(312)
3 
(329)
6 
Intangible assets(138)
3 
(442)
7 
Assets held for sale
 (1,819)
8 
Investment in formerly unconsolidated subsidiary(32)
4 
150
9 
Valuation of shares in equity method investee
 25
10 
Total$(1,627) $(2,465) 
1
The Company recognized other-than-temporary impairment1The Company is required to record assets and liabilities that are held for sale at the lower of carrying value or fair value less any costs to sell based on the agreed-upon sale price. The Company recorded charges of $266 million in the line item other income (loss) — net in our consolidated statement of income related to the restructuring of our manufacturing operations in the United States. These charges, of $334 million related to certain equity method investees in the Middle East. These impairments were primarily driven by revised projections of future operating results largely related to instability in the region, which include recent sanctions imposed locally. The Company also recognized an other-than-temporary impairment charge of $205 million related to an equity method investee in Indonesia. This impairment was primarily driven by revised projections of future operating results reflecting unfavorable macroeconomic conditions and foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. Additionally, the Company recognized an other-than-temporary impairment charge of $52 million related to one of our equity method investees in Latin America. This impairment was primarily driven by revised projections of future operating results. The fair value of each of these investments was derived using discounted cash flow analyses based on Level 3 inputs.
2
The Company recorded impairment charges of $554 million related to assets held by CCBA. These charges were incurred primarily as a result of management's view of the proceeds that are expected to be received based on revised projections of future operating results and foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. The fair value of these assets was derived using discounted cash flow analyses based on Level 3 inputs. We recorded these impairment charges in the line item income (loss) from discontinued operations in our consolidated statements of income.
3
The Company recognized charges of $312 million related to CCR's property, plant and equipment and $138 million related to CCR's intangible assets. These charges were a result of management's revised estimate of the proceeds that were expected to be received for the remaining bottling territories upon their refranchising. These charges were determined by comparing the fair value of the reporting unit, based on Level 3 inputs, to its carrying value. Refer to Note 18.
4
The Company recognized a loss of $32 million, which included the remeasurement of our previously held equity interest in the Philippine bottling operations to fair value and the reversal of the related cumulative translation adjustments. The fair value of our previously held equity investment was determined using a discounted cash flow model based on Level 3 inputs.
5
The Company recognized an other-than-temporary impairment charge of $50 million related to one of our international equity method investees, primarily driven by foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. The fair value of this investment was derived using discounted cash flow analyses based on Level 3 inputs.
6
The Company recognized impairment charges of $310 million related to CCR's property, plant and equipment and $19 million related to CCR's other assets primarily as a result of refranchising activities in North America. The fair value of these assets was derived using management's estimate of the proceeds that were expected to be received for the remaining bottling territories upon their refranchising.
7
The Company recognized an impairment charge of $375 million related to CCR's goodwill. This impairment charge was determined by comparing the fair value of the reporting unit, based on Level 3 inputs, to its carrying value. The Company also recognized an impairment charge of $33 million related to certain U.S. bottlers' franchise rights. This charge was determined by comparing the fair value of the asset to its current carrying value. Each of these impairment charges was primarily a result of refranchising activities in North America and management's estimates of the proceeds that were expected to be received for the remaining bottling territories upon their refranchising. Additionally, the Company recorded impairment charges of $34 million related to Venezuelan intangible assets due to weaker sales and the volatility of foreign currency exchange rates resulting from continued political instability. The fair value of these assets was derived using discounted cash flow analyses based on Level 3 inputs.
8
The Company is required to record assets and liabilities that are held for sale at the lower of carrying value or fair value less any costs to sell based on the agreed-upon sale price. These losses related to refranchising activities in North America. The charges were calculated based on Level 3 inputs. Refer to Note 2.
9 The Company recognized a gain of $150 million on our previously held equity interests in CCBA and its South African subsidiary, which were accounted for under the equity method of accounting prior to our consolidation of the bottler in October 2017. U.S. GAAP requires the acquirer to remeasure its previously held noncontrolling equity interest in the acquired entity to fair value as of the acquisition date and recognize any gains or losses in earnings. The Company remeasured our equity interests in CCBA and its South African subsidiary based on Level 3 inputs. Refer to Note 2.inputs, primarily impacted the line item property, plant and equipment in our consolidated balance sheet.
10 2The Company recognizedrecorded an impairment charge of $78 million related to a gaintrademark in Europe, which was driven by a change in the long-term outlook on the licensing arrangement for a certain brand. The fair value of $25this trademark was derived using discounted cash flow analyses based on Level 3 inputs.
3During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company recorded an other-than-temporary impairment charge of $252 million as a result of Coca-Cola FEMSA,related to CCBJHI, an equity method investee, issuing additional sharesinvestee. Based on the length of its stock at a per share amount greatertime and the extent to which the market value of our investment in CCBJHI was less than theour carrying value and the financial condition and near-term prospects of the Company's per share investment. Accordingly,issuer, management determined that the Company is required to treat this type of transaction as if the Company had sold a proportionate share of its investmentdecline in Coca-Cola FEMSA.fair value was other than temporary in nature. This gainimpairment charge was determined using the quoted market price (a Level 1 inputs.measurement) of CCBJHI. The Company also recorded an other-than-temporary impairment charge of $38 million related to one of our equity method investees in Latin America. This impairment charge was derived using Level 3 inputs and was primarily driven by revised projections of future operating results.

4The Company recorded impairment charges of $160 million related to its Odwalla trademark in North America, as the Company decided in June 2020 to discontinue its Odwalla juice business. The Company also recorded an impairment charge of $55 million related to a trademark in North America, which was driven by the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, revised projections of future operating results and a change in brand focus in the Company’s portfolio. The fair value of this trademark was derived using discounted cash flow analyses based on Level 3 inputs.

5The Company recorded an impairment charge of $26 million related to an investment in an equity security without a readily determinable fair value. This impairment charge was derived using Level 3 inputs and was primarily driven by revised projections of future operating results.
Fair Value Measurements for Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets
The fair value hierarchy discussed above is not only applicable to assets and liabilities that are included in our consolidated balance sheetssheet but is also applied to certain other assets that indirectly impact our consolidated financial statements. For example, our Company sponsors and/or contributes to a number of pension and other postretirement benefit plans. Assets contributed by the Company become the property of the individual plans. Even though the Company no longer has control over these assets, we are indirectly impacted by subsequent fair value adjustments to these assets. The actual return on these assets impacts the Company'sCompany’s future net periodic benefit cost or income as well as amounts recognized in our consolidated balance sheets.sheet. Refer to Note 14.13. The Company uses the fair value hierarchy to measure the fair value of assets held by our various pension and other postretirement benefit plans.
112


Pension Plan Assets
The following table summarizes the levels within the fair value hierarchy for our pension plan assets (in millions):
December 31, 2021December 31, 2020
Level 1Level 2Level 3Other1TotalLevel 1Level 2Level 3Other1Total
Cash and cash equivalents$479 $26 $ $ $505 $558 $120 $— $— $678 
Equity securities:  
U.S.-based companies2,382 22 27  2,431 2,123 12 — 2,139 
International-based companies1,684 22   1,706 1,694 32 — — 1,726 
Fixed-income securities:
Government bonds 677   677 — 637 — — 637 
Corporate bonds and debt
   securities
 994 29  1,023 — 1,011 31 — 1,042��
Mutual, pooled and commingled
   funds
36 283  531 4850 44 268 — 502 4814 
Hedge funds/limited
   partnerships
   720 5720 — — — 622 5622 
Real estate   389 6389 — — — 332 6332 
Derivative financial instruments (9)2  (9)— (15)2— — (15)
Other  283 3330 7613 — — 302 3362 7664 
Total$4,581 $2,015 $339 $1,970 $8,905 $4,419 $2,065 $337 $1,818 $8,639 
1Certain investments that are measured at fair value using the net asset value per share (or its equivalent) practical expedient have not been categorized in the fair value hierarchy but are included to reconcile to the amounts presented in Note 13.
2This class of assets includes investments in credit contracts.
3Includes purchased annuity insurance contracts.
4This class of assets includes actively managed emerging markets equity funds and a collective trust fund for qualified plans, invested primarily in equity securities of companies in developing and emerging markets. There are no liquidity restrictions on these investments.
5This class of assets includes hedge funds that can be subject to redemption restrictions, ranging from monthly to semiannually, with a redemption notice period of up to one year and/or initial lock-up periods of up to three years, and private equity funds that are primarily closed-end funds in which the Company’s investments are generally not eligible for redemption. Distributions from these private equity funds will be received as the underlying assets are liquidated or distributed.
6This class of assets includes funds invested in real estate, including a privately held real estate investment trust, a real estate commingled pension trust fund, infrastructure limited partnerships and commingled investment funds. These funds seek current income and capital appreciation and can be subject to redemption restrictions, ranging from quarterly to semiannually, with a redemption notice period of up to 90 days.
7Primarily includes segregated portfolios of private investment funds that are invested in a portfolio of insurance-linked securities. These assets can be subject to a semiannual redemption, with a redemption notice period of 90 days, subject to certain gate restrictions.

113

 December 31, 2018 December 31, 2017
 Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
 
Other 1

 Total
 Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
 
Other 1

 Total
Cash and cash equivalents$441
$22
$
 $
 $463
 $626
$65
$
 $
 $691
Equity securities:               
U.S.-based companies1,728
15
17
 
 1,760
 2,080
3
14
 
 2,097
International-based companies1,098
23

 
 1,121
 1,465


 
 1,465
Fixed-income securities:               
Government bonds
463

 
 463
 
374

 
 374
Corporate bonds and debt
   securities

819
16
 
 835
 
803
24
 
 827
Mutual, pooled and commingled
   funds
46
130

 699
3 
875
 239
42

 700
3 
981
Hedge funds/limited partnerships


 828
4 
828
 


 983
4 
983
Real estate


 391
5 
391
 

2
 596
5 
598
Other

270
2 
403
6 
673
 

263
2 
564
6 
827
Total$3,313
$1,472
$303
 $2,321
 $7,409
 $4,410
$1,287
$303
 $2,843
 $8,843

1
Certain investments that are measured at fair value using the net asset value per share (or its equivalent) practical expedient have not been categorized in the fair value hierarchy but are included to reconcile to the amounts presented in Note 14.
2
Includes purchased annuity insurance contracts.
3
This class of assets includes actively managed emerging markets equity funds and a collective trust fund for qualified plans, invested primarily in equity securities of companies in developed and emerging markets. There are no liquidity restrictions on these investments.
4
This class of assets includes hedge funds that can be subject to redemption restrictions, ranging from monthly to tri-annually, with a redemption notice period of up to 120 days and/or initial lock-up periods of up to one year, and private equity funds that are primarily closed-end funds in which the Company's investments are generally not eligible for redemption. Distributions from these private equity funds will be received as the underlying assets are liquidated or distributed.
5
This class of assets includes funds invested in real estate, including a privately held real estate investment trust, a real estate commingled pension trust fund, infrastructure limited partnerships and commingled investment funds. These funds seek current income and capital appreciation through the investments and can be subject to redemption restrictions, ranging from quarterly to semi-annually, with a redemption notice period of up to 90 days.
6
This class of assets includes segregated portfolios of private investment funds that are invested in a portfolio of insurance-linked securities. These assets can be subject to a semi-annual redemption, with a redemption notice period of 90 days, subject to certain gate restrictions.


The following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balance of Level 3 assets for our U.S. and non-U.S. pension plans (in millions):
Equity
Securities
Fixed-Income SecuritiesOther1Total
2020    
Balance at beginning of year$21 $40 $273 $334 
Actual return on plan assets— 
Purchases, sales and settlements — net(18)(17)(31)
Transfers into Level 3 — net— 
Net foreign currency translation adjustments— — 19 19 
Balance at end of year$$31 $302 $337 
2021   
Balance at beginning of year$4 $31 $302 $337 
Actual return on plan assets21 (3)(6)12 
Purchases, sales and settlements — net2 7 (2)7 
Transfers into Level 3 — net (6) (6)
Net foreign currency translation adjustments  (11)(11)
Balance at end of year$27 $29 $283 $339 
 
Equity
Securities

 Fixed-Income Securities
 Real Estate
 Other
 Total
2017         
Balance at beginning of year$14
 $19
 $2
 $211
 $246
Actual return on plan assets held at the reporting date(3) 1
 
 4
 2
Purchases, sales and settlements — net3
 1
 
 (9) (5)
Transfers into/(out of) Level 3 — net
 3
 
 31
 34
Foreign currency translation adjustments
 
 
 26
 26
Balance at end of year$14
 $24
 $2
 $263
1 
$303
2018         
Balance at beginning of year$14
 $24
 $2
 $263
 $303
Actual return on plan assets held at the reporting date(2) (1) 
 19
 16
Purchases, sales and settlements — net3
 (7) (2) 1
 (5)
Transfers into/(out of) Level 3 — net2
 
 
 
 2
Foreign currency translation adjustments
 
 
 (13) (13)
Balance at end of year$17
 $16
 $
 $270
1 
$303
1Includes purchased annuity insurance contracts.
1
Includes purchased annuity insurance contracts.
Other Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets
The following table summarizes the levels within the fair value hierarchy for our other postretirement benefit plan assets (in millions):
December 31, 2021December 31, 2020
Level 1Level 2
Other 1
TotalLevel 1Level 2
Other 1
Total
Cash and cash equivalents$32 $1 $ $33 $29 $$— $30 
Equity securities:  
U.S.-based companies183 1  184 169 — 170 
International-based companies12   12 12 — — 12 
Fixed-income securities: 
Government bonds 3  3 — — 
Corporate bonds and debt securities 82  82 — 80 — 80 
Mutual, pooled and commingled funds 85 2 87 — 84 86 
Hedge funds/limited partnerships  9 9 — — 
Real estate  5 5 — — 
Other  4 4 — — 
Total$227 $172 $20 $419 $210 $169 $17 $396 
1Certain investments that are measured at fair value using the net asset value per share (or its equivalent) practical expedient have not been categorized in the fair value hierarchy but are included to reconcile to the amounts presented in Note 13.
114

 December 31, 2018 December 31, 2017
 Level 1
Level 2
Other 1

Total
 Level 1
Level 2
Other 1

Total
Cash and cash equivalents$73
$
$
$73
 $78
$
$
$78
Equity securities:         
U.S.-based companies93


93
 96


96
International-based companies7


7
 8


8
Fixed-income securities:         
Government bonds
2

2
 
2

2
Corporate bonds and debt securities
16

16
 
7

7
Mutual, pooled and commingled funds

82
82
 

80
80
Hedge funds/limited partnerships

8
8
 

8
8
Real estate

4
4
 

5
5
Other

4
4
 

4
4
Total$173
$18
$98
$289
 $182
$9
$97
$288

1
Certain investments that are measured at fair value using the net asset value per share (or its equivalent) practical expedient have not been categorized in the fair value hierarchy but are included to reconcile to the amounts presented in Note 14.


Other Fair Value Disclosures
The carrying amountsvalues of cash and cash equivalents; short-term investments; trade accounts receivable; accounts payable and accrued expenses; and loans and notes payable approximate their fair values because of the relatively short-term maturities of these financial instruments. As of December 31, 2018,2021, the carrying amountvalue and fair value of our long-term debt, including the current portion, were $30,361$39,454 million and $30,438$40,311 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2017,2020, the carrying amountvalue and fair value of our long-term debt, including the current portion, were $34,480$40,610 million and $35,169$43,218 million, respectively.
NOTE 18:17: SIGNIFICANT OPERATING AND NONOPERATING ITEMS
Other Operating Charges
In 2018,2021, the Company recorded other operating charges of $1,079$846 million. These charges primarily consisted of $450 million of CCR asset impairments and $440$369 million related to the Company'sremeasurement of our contingent consideration liability to fair value in conjunction with the fairlife acquisition, $146 million related to the Company’s strategic realignment initiatives, $119 million related to the BodyArmor acquisition, which includes various transition and transaction costs, distributor termination fees, employee retention costs and the amortization of noncompete agreements, and $115 million related to the Company’s productivity and reinvestment program. In addition, other operating charges included $139an impairment charge of $78 million related to a trademark in Europe, charges of $15 million related to tax litigation and a net charge of $4 million related to the restructuring of our manufacturing operations in the United States.
In 2020, the Company recorded other operating charges of $853 million. These charges primarily consisted of $413 million related to the Company’s strategic realignment initiatives and $99 million related to the Company’s productivity and reinvestment program. In addition, other operating charges included impairment charges of $160 million related to the Odwalla trademark and net charges of $33 million related to discontinuing the Odwalla juice business. Other operating charges also included an impairment charge of $55 million related to a trademark in North America. In addition, other operating charges included $51 million related to the remeasurement of our contingent consideration liability to fair value in conjunction with the fairlife acquisition and net charges of $16 million related to the restructuring of our manufacturing operations in the United States.
In 2019, the Company recorded other operating charges of $458 million. These charges included $264 million related to the Company’s productivity and reinvestment program and $42 million related to the impairment of a trademark in Asia Pacific. In addition, other operating charges included $46 million of transaction costs associated with the purchase of Costa, which we acquired in January 2019, and $95 million for costs incurred to refranchise certain of our North America bottling operations. These costs include,included, among other items, internal and external costs for individuals directly working on the refranchising efforts, severance, and costs associated with the implementation of information technology systems to facilitate consistent data standards and availability throughout our bottling systems. Other operating charges also included $33 million related to tax litigation expense and $19 million related to noncapitalizable transaction costs associated with pending and closed transactions.
Refer to Note 2 for additional information on the refranchisingacquisitions of our bottling operations.BodyArmor, fairlife and Costa. Refer to Note 1211 for additional information related to the tax litigation. Refer to Note 1716 for additional information on the impairment charges. Refer to Note 1918 for additional information on the Company'sCompany’s strategic realignment initiatives and productivity and reinvestment program. Refer to Note 2019 for the impact these charges had on our operating segments and Corporate.
In 2017, the Company recorded other operating charges of $1,902 million. These charges primarily consisted of $737 million of CCR asset impairments and $534 million related to the Company's productivity and reinvestment program. In addition, other operating charges included $280 million related to costs incurred to refranchise certain of our bottling operations. Other operating charges also included $225 million related to a cash contribution we made to The Coca-Cola Foundation, $67 million related to tax litigation expense, $34 million related to impairments of Venezuelan intangible assets and $19 million related to noncapitalizable transaction costs associated with pending and closed transactions. Refer to Note 1 for additional information about the Venezuelan intangible assets. Refer to Note 2 for additional information on the refranchising of our bottling operations. Refer to Note 17 for information on how the Company determined the asset impairment charges. Refer to Note 19 for additional information on the Company's productivity and reinvestment program. Refer to Note 20 for the impact these charges had on our operating segments and Corporate.
In 2016, the Company recorded other operating charges of $1,371 million. These charges primarily consisted of $352 million due to the Company's productivity and reinvestment program and $240 million due to the integration of our German bottling operations. In addition, the Company recorded charges of $276 million related to costs incurred to refranchise certain of our bottling operations. The Company also recorded a charge of $200 million related to cash contributions we made to The Coca‑Cola Foundation, a charge of $76 million due to the write-down we recorded related to our receivables from our bottling partner in Venezuela as a result of changes in exchange rates, and charges of $41 million related to noncapitalizable transaction costs associated with pending and closed transactions. In 2016, the Company also recorded impairment charges of $153 million related to certain intangible assets. Refer to Note 1 for additional information on the Venezuelan exchange rates. Refer to Note 2 for additional information on the refranchising of our bottling operations. Refer to Note 17 for additional information on the impairment charges. Refer to Note 19 for additional information on the Company's productivity, integration and restructuring initiatives. Refer to Note 20 for the impact these charges had on our operating segments and Corporate.
Other Nonoperating Items
Interest Expense
During the yearyears ended December 31, 2018,2021 and 2020, the Company recorded a net gaincharges of $27$650 million and $484 million, respectively, related to the early extinguishment of long-term debt. Refer to Note 11 for additional information.
During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company recorded a net charge of $38 million related to the early extinguishment of long-term debt. Refer to Note 11 for additional information.10.
Equity Income (Loss) — Net
The Company recorded net charges of $111$13 million, $92$216 million and $61$100 million in equity income (loss) — net during the years endedDecember 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, respectively. These amounts primarily represent the Company'sCompany’s proportionate share of significant operating and nonoperating items recorded by certain of our equity method investees. Refer to Note 2019 for the impact these charges had on our operating segments and Corporate.

115



Other Income (Loss) — Net
In 2018, other income (loss) —During 2021, the Company recognized a gain of $834 million in conjunction with the BodyArmor acquisition, a net was a lossgain of $1,121 million. The Company recorded other-than-temporary impairment charges of $591$695 million related to certainthe sale of our ownership interest in CCA, an equity method investeesinvestee, and a net chargesgain of $476$114 million duerelated to the refranchisingsale of certain bottling territoriesour ownership interest in North America.an equity method investee and the sale of a portion of our ownership interest in another equity method investee. Additionally, the Company recognized a net gain of $467 million related to realized and unrealized gains and losses on equity securities and trading debt securities as well as realized gains and losses on available-for-sale debt securities. The Company also recorded charges of $266 million related to the restructuring of our manufacturing operations in the United States and pension plan settlement charges of $117 million related to our strategic realignment initiatives.
During 2020, the Company recognized a gain of $902 million in conjunction with the fairlife acquisition, a net lossgain of $278$148 million related to realized and unrealized gains and losses on equity securities and trading debt securities as well as realized gains and losses on available-for-sale debt securities, charges of $240 million related to pension settlements, and a net loss of $79 million related to economic hedging activity associated with the purchase of Costa, which we acquired on January 3, 2019. Additionally, we recorded charges of $34 million primarily related to payments made to convert the bottling agreements for certain North America bottling partners' territories to a single form of CBA with additional requirements, a net loss of $33 million primarily related to the reversal of the cumulative translation adjustments resulting from the substantial liquidation of the Company's former Russian juice operations, and a $32 million loss related to acquiring a controlling interest in the Philippine bottling operations. These charges were partially offset by a net gain of $296$35 million related to the sale of our ownership interest in an equity method investee and the sale of a portion of our ownership interest in Lindleyanother equity method investee. These gains were partially offset by an other-than-temporary impairment charge of $252 million related to CCBJHI, an equity method investee, an other-than-temporary impairment charge of $38 million related to one of our equity method investees in Latin America, an impairment charge of $26 million associated with an investment in an equity security without a readily determinable fair value and a net loss of $55 million related to economic hedging activities. The Company also recorded net charges of $25 million related to the restructuring of our manufacturing operations in the United States and pension and other postretirement benefit plan settlement and curtailment charges of $14 million related to the Company’s strategic realignment initiatives.
During 2019, the Company recognized a gain of $739 million on the sale of a retail and office building in New York City. The Company also recognized a net gain of $47$250 million related to realized and unrealized gains and losses on equity securities and trading debt securities as well as realized gains and losses on available-for-sale debt securities, a gain of $73 million related to the refranchising of certain bottling operations in India and a gain of $39 million related to the sale of a portion of our ownership interest in Andina. These gains were partially offset by other-than-temporary impairment charges of $406 million related to CCBJHI, an equity method investee, $255 million related to certain equity method investees in the Middle East, $57 million related to one of our equity method investees in North America and $49 million related to one of our equity method investees in Latin AmericanAmerica. The Company also recorded an adjustment to reduce the carrying amount of CCBA’s fixed assets and definite-lived intangible assets by $160 million and recognized a $118 million net loss in conjunction with our acquisition of the remaining ownership interest in CHI. Additionally, the Company recorded net charges of $105 million primarily related to post-closing adjustments as contemplated by the related agreements associated with the refranchising of certain bottling operations. territories in North America.
Refer to Note 12 for additional information on the acquisitions of BodyArmor, fairlife and CHI, the sale of our ownership interest in CCA, the sale of a portion of our ownership interest in Andina, the refranchising activity in India, and the CCBA asset adjustment. Refer to Note 4 for additional information on equity and debt securities. Refer to Note 2 for additional information on refranchising activities, North America conversion payments, the sale of our equity ownership in Lindley and our acquisition of the controlling interest in the Philippine bottling operations. Refer to Note 65 for additional information on our economic hedging activities. Refer to Note 1716 for additional information on how the Company determined the impairment charges.charges and charges related to the restructuring of our manufacturing operations in the United States. Refer to Note 2018 for additional information on the Company’s strategic realignment initiatives. Refer to Note 19 for the impact these items had on our operating segments and Corporate.
NOTE 18: RESTRUCTURING
Strategic Realignment
In August 2020, the Company announced strategic steps to transform our organizational structure in an effort to better enable us to capture growth in the fast-changing marketplace. The Company has transformed into a networked global organization designed to combine the power of scale with the deep knowledge required to win locally. We created new operating units effective January 1, 2021, which are focused on regional and local execution. The operating units, which sit under the four existing geographic operating segments, are highly interconnected, with more consistency in their structure and a focus on eliminating duplication of resources and scaling new products more quickly. The operating units work closely with five global marketing category leadership teams to rapidly scale ideas while staying close to the consumer. The global marketing category leadership teams primarily focus on innovation as well as marketing efficiency and effectiveness. The organizational structure also includes a center and a platform services organization. Refer to Note 2219 for additional information on our organizational structure.
116


The Company has incurred total pretax expenses of $690 million related to these strategic realignment initiatives since they commenced. These expenses were recorded in the acquisition of Costa.
In 2017,line items other operating charges and other income (loss) — net was a lossin our consolidated statements of $1,764 million. The Company recognized a net charge of $2,140 million due to the refranchising of certain bottling territories in North America and charges of $313 million primarily related to payments made to convert the bottling agreements for certain North America bottling partners' territories to a single form of CBA with additional requirements. The Company also recorded net charges of $255 million resulting from settlements, special termination benefits and curtailment credits primarily related to North America refranchising and the Company's productivity and reinvestment program. Additionally, the Company recorded an other-than-temporary impairment charge of $50 million related to one of our international equity method investees, primarily driven by foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. The Company also incurred a charge of $26 million related to our former German bottling operations. These charges were partially offset by a gain of $445 million related to the integration of CCW and CCEJ to establish CCBJHI. In exchange for our previously existing equity interests in CCW and CCEJ, we received an approximate 17 percent equity interest in CCBJHI. The Company also recognized a gain of $150 million related to the remeasurement of our previously held equity interests in CCBA and its South African subsidiary to fair value upon consolidation of CCBA. Additionally, the Company recognized a gain of $88 million related to the refranchising of our China bottling operations and the sale of a related cost method investment and a gain of $25 million as a result of Coca-Cola FEMSA, an equity method investee, issuing additional shares of its stock during the period at a per share amount greater than the carrying value of the Company's per share investment.income. Refer to Note 2 for additional information on our North America and China refranchising activities, the conversion payments and our consolidation of CCBA. Refer to Note 2019 for the impact these itemsexpenses had on our operating segments and Corporate. Outside services reported in the table below primarily relate to expenses in connection with legal and consulting activities. These initiatives were substantially complete as of December 31, 2021.
In 2016, other income (loss) — net was a lossThe following table summarizes the balance of $1,265 million. This loss included losses of $2,456 million due to the refranchising of certain bottling territories in North America and a net charge of $139 million resulting from settlements and special termination benefits primarilyaccrued expenses related to North America refranchising. The Company also recorded a loss of $21 million due to the deconsolidation of our South African bottling operationsthese strategic realignment initiatives (in millions):
Severance Pay
and Benefits
Outside ServicesOther
Direct Costs
Total
2020
Costs incurred$386 $37 $$427 
Payments(170)(36)(1)(207)
Noncash and exchange(35)1— — (35)
Accrued balance at end of year$181 $$$185 
2021
Accrued balance at beginning of year$181 $1 $3 $185 
Costs incurred224 37 2 263 
Payments(265)(35)(3)(303)
Noncash and exchange(120)1(2) (122)
Accrued balance at end of year$20 $1 $2 $23 
1Includes stock-based compensation modifications, pension settlement charges, and disposal of the related equity method investment in exchange for investments in CCBA and CCBA's South African subsidiary. The Company incurred charges of $31 million related to payments made to convert the bottling agreements for certain North America bottling partners' territories to a single form of CBA with additional requirements. Additionally, the Company incurred a charge of $72 million as a result of remeasuring its net monetary assets denominated in Egyptian pounds. The Egyptian pound devalued as a result of the central bank allowing its currency, which was previously pegged to the U.S. dollar, to float freely. These charges were partially offset by a gain of $1,323 million due to the deconsolidation of our German bottling operations.other postretirement benefit plan curtailment charges. Refer to Note 2 for additional information on the deconsolidation of our German bottling operations, the deconsolidation of our South African bottling operations, the North America refranchising12 and the conversion payments. Refer to Note 20 for the impact these items had on our operating segments and Corporate.



NOTE 19: PRODUCTIVITY, INTEGRATION AND RESTRUCTURING INITIATIVES13.
Productivity and Reinvestment Program    
In February 2012, the Company announced a productivity and reinvestment program designed to further enable our efforts to strengthen our brands and reinvest our resources to drive long-term profitable growth. This program is focused onwas expanded multiple times, with the following initiatives: global supply chain optimization; global marketing and innovation effectiveness; operating expense leverage and operational excellence; data and information technology systems standardization; and the integration of Old CCE.
In February 2014, the Company announced thelast expansion of our productivity and reinvestment program to drive incremental productivity that will primarily be redirected into increased media investments. Our incremental productivity goal consists of two relatively equal components. First,occurring in April 2017. While we will expand savings through global supply chain optimization, data and information technology systems standardization, and resource and cost reallocation. Second, we will increase the effectiveness of our marketing investments by transforming our marketing and commercial model to redeploy resources into more consumer-facing marketing investments to accelerate growth.
In October 2014, the Company announced that we were further expanding our productivity and reinvestment program and extending it through 2019. The expansionexpect most of the productivityremaining initiatives focuses on four key areas: restructuringincluded in this program, which are primarily designed to further simplify and standardize our organization, to be completed by the Company's global supply chain; implementing zero-based work, an evolutionend of zero-based budget principles, across the organization; streamlining and simplifying the Company's operating model; and further driving increased discipline and efficiency in direct marketing investments.
In April 2017, the Company announced another expansion of our productivity and reinvestment program. This expansion is focused on achieving additional efficiencies in both our supply chain and our marketing expenditures as well as transitioning to a new, more agile operating model to enable growth. Under this operating model, our business units will be supported by an expanded enabling services organization and a corporate center focused on a few strategic2023, certain initiatives policy and governance. The expanded enabling services organization will focus on both simplifying and standardizing key transactional processes and providing support to business units through global centers of excellence.may extend into 2024.
The Company has incurred total pretax expenses of $3,566$4,044 million related to our productivity and reinvestment program since it commenced. These expenses were recorded in the line items other operating charges and other income (loss) — net in our consolidated statements of income. Refer to Note 2019 for the impact these charges had on our operating segments and Corporate. Outside services reported in the table below primarily relate to expenses in connectioninclude costs associated with legal, outplacement and consulting activities. Other direct costs reported in the table below include, among other items, internal and external costs associated with the development, communication, administration and implementation of these initiatives; accelerated depreciation on certain fixed assets; contract termination fees; and relocation costs.

117



The following table summarizes the balance of accrued expenses related to these productivity and reinvestment initiatives and the changes in the accrued amounts (in millions):
Severance Pay
and Benefits
Outside ServicesOther
Direct Costs
Total
2019
Accrued balance at beginning of year$76 $10 $$90 
Costs incurred36 87 141 264 
Payments(57)(98)(119)(274)
Noncash and exchange(19)(14)
Accrued balance at end of year$58 $$$66 
2020
Accrued balance at beginning of year$58 $$$66 
Costs incurred(12)69 42 99 
Payments(29)(70)(36)(135)
Noncash and exchange(2)— (11)(13)
Accrued balance at end of year$15 $— $$17 
2021    
Accrued balance at beginning of year$15 $ $2 $17 
Costs incurred4 97 14 115 
Payments(6)(97)(14)(117)
Noncash and exchange(1) 3 2 
Accrued balance at end of year$12 $ $5 $17 
118
 
Severance Pay
and Benefits

 Outside Services
 
Other
Direct Costs

 Total
2016       
Accrued balance at beginning of year$144
 $8
 $52
 $204
Costs incurred95
 27
 230
 352
Payments(114) (30) (205) (349)
Noncash and exchange(2) 1
 (55) (56)
Accrued balance at end of year$123
 $6
 $22
 $151
2017       
Costs incurred$310
 $79
 $261
 $650
Payments(181) (83) (267) (531)
Noncash and exchange(62)
1 
(1) (1) (64)
Accrued balance at end of year$190
 $1
 $15
 $206
2018       
Costs incurred$164
 $92
 $252
 $508
Payments(209) (83) (211) (503)
Noncash and exchange(69)
1 

 (52) (121)
Accrued balance at end of year$76
 $10
 $4
 $90
1

Includes pension settlement charges. Refer to Note 14.
Integration Initiatives
Integration of Our German Bottling Operations
In 2008, the Company began an integration initiative related to our German bottling operations acquired in 2007. The Company incurred $240 million of expenses related to this initiative in 2016 and has incurred total pretax expenses of $1,367 million related to this initiative since it commenced. These expenses were recorded in the line item other operating charges in our consolidated statements of income and impacted the Bottling Investments operating segment. The expenses recorded in connection with these integration activities have been primarily due to involuntary terminations. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company deconsolidated our German bottling operations. Therefore, there was no remaining accrual balance as of December 31, 2016. Refer to Note 2 for additional information on the deconsolidation of our German bottling operations.
NOTE 20: 19: OPERATING SEGMENTS
As of December 31, 2018, ourOur organizational structure consistedconsists of the following operating segments: Europe, Middle East and Africa; Latin America; North America; Asia Pacific; Global Ventures; and Bottling Investments. Our operating structure also includedincludes Corporate, which consists of two components: (1) a center focusedfocusing on strategic initiatives, policy, and governance and scaling global initiatives; and (2) an enablinga platform services organization focused on both simplifyingsupporting operating units, global marketing category leadership teams and standardizing keythe center by providing efficient and scaled global services and capabilities including, but not limited to, transactional processeswork, data management, consumer analytics, digital commerce and providing support to business units through global centers of excellence.social/digital hubs.
Segment Products and Services
The business of our Company is primarily nonalcoholic beverages. Our geographic operating segments (Europe, Middle East and Africa; Latin America; North America; and Asia Pacific) derive a majority of their revenues from the manufacture and sale of beverage concentrates and syrups and, in some cases, the sale of finished beverages. Our Global Ventures operating segment includes the results of our Costa, innocent and doğadan businesses as well as fees earned pursuant to distribution coordination agreements between the Company and Monster. Our Bottling Investments operating segment is composed of our Company-owned or consolidated bottling operations, with the exception of those that are classified as discontinued operations, regardless of the geographic location of the bottler. Our Bottling Investments operating segment also includes equity income from the majority of our equity method investments. Company-owned orinvestees. Our consolidated bottling operations derive the majority of their revenues from the manufacture and sale of finished beverages. Generally, finished product operations produce higher net operating revenues but lower gross profit margins compared tothan concentrate operations. Refer to Note 3.


The following table sets forth the percentage of total net operating revenues relatedattributable to concentrate operations and finished product operations:
Year Ended December 31,2018
 2017
 2016
Year Ended December 31,202120202019
Concentrate operations64% 51% 40%Concentrate operations56 %56 %55 %
Finished product operations36

49
 60
Finished product operations44 44 45 
Total100% 100% 100%Total100 %100 %100 %
Method of Determining Segment Income or Loss
Management evaluates the performance of our operating segments separately to individually monitor the different factors affecting financial performance. Our Company manages income taxes from continuing operations and certain treasury-related items, such as interest income and interest expense, on a global basis within Corporate. We evaluate operating segment performance based primarily on net operating revenues and operating income or loss from continuing operations before income taxes.(loss).
Geographic Data
The following table provides information related to our net operating revenues (in millions):
Year Ended December 31,2018
 2017
 2016
Year Ended December 31,202120202019
United States$11,344
 $14,727
 $19,899
United States$13,010 $11,281 $11,715 
International20,512
 20,683
 21,964
International25,645 21,733 25,551 
Net operating revenues$31,856
 $35,410
 $41,863
Net operating revenues$38,655 $33,014 $37,266 
The following table provides information related to our property, plant and equipment — net (in millions):
Year Ended December 31,202120202019
United States$3,420 $3,988 $4,062 
International6,500 6,789 6,776 
Property, plant and equipment — net$9,920 $10,777 $10,838 
119

Year Ended December 31,2018
 2017
 2016
United States$4,154
 $4,163
 $6,784
International4,078
 4,040
 3,851
Property, plant and equipment — net$8,232
 $8,203
 $10,635



Information about our Company's continuingCompany’s operations by operating segment and Corporate as of and for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, is as follows (in millions):
Europe,
Middle East & Africa
Latin
America
North
America
Asia PacificGlobal VenturesBottling
Investments
CorporateEliminationsConsolidated
As of and for the Year Ended December 31, 2021        
Net operating revenues:        
   Third party$6,564 $4,143 $13,184 $4,682 

$2,805 $7,194 $83 $ $38,655 
   Intersegment629  6 609  9 2 (1,255) 
   Total net operating revenues7,193 4,143 13,190 5,291 2,805 7,203 85 (1,255)38,655 
Operating income (loss)3,735 2,534 3,331 2,325 293 473 (2,383) 10,308 
Interest income  40  10  226  276 
Interest expense      1,597  1,597 
Depreciation and amortization76 39 388 49 135 529 236  1,452 
Equity income (loss) — net33 9 22 8 (6)1,071 301  1,438 
Income (loss) before income taxes3,821 2,542 3,140 2,350 310 1,596 (1,334) 12,425 
Identifiable operating assets7,908 21,720 25,730 2,355 37,949 10,312 2,319,964  75,938 
Investments1
436 594 21 230  12,669 4,466  18,416 
Capital expenditures35 2 228 65 285 560 192  1,367 
As of and for the Year Ended December 31, 2020        
Net operating revenues:        
   Third party$5,534 $3,499 $11,473 $4,213 $1,991 $6,258 $46 $— $33,014 
   Intersegment523 — 509 — — (1,043)— 
   Total net operating revenues6,057 3,499 11,477 4,722 1,991 6,265 46 (1,043)33,014 
Operating income (loss)3,313 2,116 2,471 2,133 (123)308 (1,221)— 8,997 
Interest income— — 64 — 11 — 295 — 370 
Interest expense— — — — — — 1,437 — 1,437 
Depreciation and amortization86 45 439 47 122 551 246 — 1,536 
Equity income (loss) — net31 (72)— (9)779 241 — 978 
Income (loss) before income taxes3,379 2,001 2,500 2,158 (120)898 (1,067)— 9,749 
Identifiable operating assets8,098 21,597 19,444 2,073 37,575 10,521 2,317,903 — 67,211 
Investments1
517 603 345 240 14,183 4,193 — 20,085 
Capital expenditures27 182 20 261 474 207 — 1,177 
Year Ended December 31, 2019  
Net operating revenues:  
   Third party$6,434 $4,118 $11,906 $4,723 $2,560 $7,431 $94 $— $37,266 
   Intersegment624 — 604 — (1,248)— 
   Total net operating revenues7,058 4,118 11,915 5,327 2,562 7,440 94 (1,248)37,266 
Operating income (loss)3,551 2,375 2,594 2,282 334 358 (1,408)— 10,086 
Interest income— — 65 — 12 — 486 — 563 
Interest expense— — — — — — 946 — 946 
Depreciation and amortization86 35 439 31 117 446 211 — 1,365 
Equity income (loss) — net35 (32)(6)11 (3)836 208 — 1,049 
Income (loss) before income taxes3,361 2,288 2,592 2,310 343 716 (824)— 10,786 
Capital expenditures108 140 392 47 209 836 322 — 2,054 
1Principally equity method investments and other investments in bottling companies.
2Property, plant and equipment — net in South Africa represented 16 percent and 15 percent of consolidated property, plant and equipment — net as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
3Property, plant and equipment — net in the Philippines represented 10 percent of consolidated property, plant and equipment — net as of December 31, 2021 and 2020.


120


 Europe, Middle East & Africa
 
Latin
America

 
North
America

 Asia Pacific
 
Bottling
Investments

 Corporate
 Eliminations
 Consolidated
 
2018                
Net operating revenues:                
   Third party$7,138
 $3,975
 $11,505
 $4,809

$3,760
 $105
 $
 $31,292
 
   Intersegment564
 39
 263
 388
 11
 
 (701) 564
4 
   Total net operating revenues7,702
 4,014
 11,768
 5,197
 3,771
 105
 (701) 31,856
 
Operating income (loss)3,714
 2,321
 2,453
 2,278
 (649) (1,417) 
 8,700
 
Interest income
 
 70
 
 
 612
 
 682
 
Interest expense
 
 
 
 
 919
 
 919
 
Depreciation and amortization85
 30
 422
 58
 239
 252
 
 1,086
 
Equity income (loss) — net2
 (19) (2) 12
 828
 187
 
 1,008
 
Income (loss) from continuing operations
   before income taxes
3,406
 2,247
 2,494
 2,305
 (612) (1,490) 
 8,350
 
Identifiable operating assets1
7,985
 1,715
 17,913
 1,999
2 
4,135
2 
22,649
 
 56,396
5 
Investments3
789
 784
 400
 216
 14,367
 3,718
 
 20,274
 
Capital expenditures77
 90
 429
 31
 316
 404
 
 1,347
 
2017                
Net operating revenues:                
   Third party$7,332
 $3,956
 $8,796
 $4,767
 $10,379
 $138
 $
 $35,368
 
   Intersegment42
 73
 1,954
 409
 81
 
 (2,517) 42
4 
   Total net operating revenues7,374
 4,029
 10,750
 5,176
 10,460
 138
 (2,517) 35,410
 
Operating income (loss)3,625
 2,218
 2,591
 2,147
 (962) (2,020) 
 7,599
 
Interest income
 
 44
 
 
 633
 
 677
 
Interest expense
 
 
 
 
 841
 
 841
 
Depreciation and amortization91
 37
 411
 65
 454
 202
 
 1,260
 
Equity income (loss) — net48
 (3) (3) 11
 878
 140
 
 1,071
 
Income (loss) from continuing operations
   before income taxes
3,706
 2,211
 2,320
 2,179
 (2,358) (1,316) 
 6,742
 
Identifiable operating assets1
5,475
 1,896
 17,619
 2,072
2 
4,493
2 
27,060
 
 58,615
5 
Investments3
1,238
 891
 112
 177
 15,998
 3,536
 
 21,952
 
Capital expenditures81
 55
 541
 50
 662
 286
 
 1,675
 
2016                
Net operating revenues:                
   Third party$7,014
 $3,746
 $6,587
 $4,788
 $19,601
 $127
 $
 $41,863
 
   Intersegment264
 73
 3,738
 506
 134
 5
 (4,720) 
 
   Total net operating revenues7,278
 3,819
 10,325
 5,294
 19,735
 132
 (4,720) 41,863
 
Operating income (loss)3,668
 1,953
 2,614
 2,210
 1
 (1,789) 
 8,657
 
Interest income
 
 27
 
 
 615
 
 642
 
Interest expense
 
 
 
 
 733
 
 733
 
Depreciation and amortization93
 35
 426
 80
 1,013
 140
 
 1,787
 
Equity income (loss) — net62
 18
 (17) 9
 648
 115
 
 835
 
Income (loss) from continuing operations
   before income taxes
3,749
 1,966
 2,592
 2,238
 (1,955) (454) 
 8,136
 
Capital expenditures62
 45
 438
 107
 1,329
 281
 
 2,262
 
1
Principally cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, marketable securities, trade accounts receivable, inventories, goodwill, trademarks and other intangible assets, and property, plant and equipment — net.
2
Property, plant and equipment — net in India represented 10 percent and 11 percent of consolidated property, plant and equipment — net in 2018 and 2017, respectively.
3
Principally equity method investments and other investments in bottling companies.
4
Intersegment revenues do not eliminate on a consolidated basis in the table above due to intercompany sales to our discontinued operations.


5
Identifiable operating assets excludes $6,546 million and $7,329 million of assets held for sale discontinued operations as of December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively.
During 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, our operating segments and Corporate were impacted by acquisition and divestiture activities. Refer to Note 2.
In 2018,2021, the results of our operating segments and Corporate were impacted by the following items:
Operating income (loss) and income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes were reduced by $4$369 million for Latin America, $175Corporate related to the remeasurement of our contingent consideration liability to fair value in conjunction with the fairlife acquisition. Refer to Note 2.
Operating income (loss) and income (loss) before income taxes were reduced by $115 million for Corporate due to the Company’s productivity and reinvestment program. Refer to Note 18.
Operating income (loss) and income (loss) before income taxes were reduced by $98 million for Corporate and $21 million for North America $31 million for Bottling Investmentsrelated to various costs incurred in conjunction with our acquisition of BodyArmor. Refer to Note 2 and $237 million for Corporate,Note 17.
Operating income (loss) and increasedincome (loss) before income taxes were reduced by $3$78 million for Europe, Middle East and Africa related to the impairment of a trademark. Refer to Note 16.
Operating income (loss) and $4income (loss) before income taxes were reduced by $63 million and $61 million, respectively, for Europe, Middle East and Africa, $46 million and $160 million, respectively, for Corporate, $12 million and $14 million, respectively, for Asia Pacific, and $11 million and $12 million, respectively, for Latin America due to the Company's productivity and reinvestment program, including refinements to prior period accruals.Company’s strategic realignment initiatives. In addition, operating income (loss) from continuing operationsand income (loss) before income taxes were both reduced by $14 million for North America and income (loss) before income taxes was reduced by $64$2 million for Corporate and $4 million for Latin AmericaBottling Investments due to pension settlements related to the Company's productivity and reinvestment program.Company’s strategic realignment initiatives. Refer to Note 14 and Note 19.18.
Operating income (loss) and income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes were reduced by $450$52 million and $316 million, respectively, for North America, and income (loss) before income taxes was reduced by $2 million for Bottling Investments dueCorporate related to asset impairment charges.the restructuring of our manufacturing operations in the United States. Refer to Note 17.16.
Operating income (loss) and income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes were reduced by $139 million for Bottling Investments due to costs incurred to refranchise certain of our bottling operations.
Operating income (loss) and income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes were reduced by $33$15 million for Corporate duerelated to tax litigation expense. Refer to Note 12.11.
Operating incomeIncome (loss) and income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes were reducedwas increased by $19$834 million for Corporate in conjunction with our acquisition of BodyArmor, which resulted from the remeasurement of our previously held equity interest in BodyArmor to fair value. Refer to Note 2.
Income (loss) before income taxes was increased by $695 million for Corporate related to noncapitalizable transaction costs associated with pending and closed transactions.the sale of our ownership interest in CCA, an equity method investee. Refer to Note 2.
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes was reducedincreased by $476 million for Bottling Investments due to the refranchising of certain bottling territories in North America. Refer to Note 2.
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes was reduced by $334 million for Europe, Middle East and Africa, $205 million for Bottling Investments and $52 million for Latin America due to other-than-temporary impairment charges related to certain of our equity method investees. Refer to Note 17.
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes was reduced by $278$467 million for Corporate related to realized and unrealized gains and losses on equity securities and trading debt securities as well as realized gains and losses on available-for-sale debt securities. Refer to Note 4.
Income (loss) from continuing operationsbefore income taxes was increased by $114 million for Corporate related to the sale of our ownership interest in an equity method investee and the sale of a portion of our ownership interest in another equity method investee. Refer to Note 2.
Income (loss) before income taxes was reduced by $124$650 million for Corporate related to charges associated with the extinguishment of long-term debt. Refer to Note 10.
Income (loss) before income taxes was reduced by $45 million for Bottling Investments and was increased by $13$32 million for Corporate due to the Company'sCompany’s proportionate share of significant operating and nonoperating items recorded by certain of our equity method investees.
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes was reduced by $149 million for Bottling Investments due to pension settlements related to the refranchising of North America bottling operations. Refer to Note 14.
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes was reduced by $79 million for Corporate related to economic hedging activity associated with the purchase of Costa, which we acquired on January 3, 2019. Refer to Note 6 and Note 22.
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes was reduced by $34 million for North America primarily related to payments made to convert the bottling agreements for certain North America bottling partners' territories to a single form of CBA with additional requirements. Refer to Note 2.
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes was reduced by $33 million for Bottling Investments primarily due to the reversal of the cumulative translation adjustments resulting from the substantial liquidation of the Company's former Russian juice operations.
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes was reduced by $32 million for Corporate related to acquiring a controlling interest in the Philippine bottling operations. Refer to Note 2.
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes was increased by $296 million for Corporate related to the sale of our equity ownership in Lindley. Refer to Note 2.
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes was increased by $47 million for Corporate related to the refranchising of our Latin American bottling operations. Refer to Note 2.


Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes was increased by $27 million for Corporate related to a net gain on the extinguishment of long-term debt. Refer to Note 11.
In 2017,2020, the results of our operating segments and Corporate were impacted by the following items:
Operating income (loss) and income (loss) from continuing operationsbefore income taxes for North America were reduced by $160 million related to the impairment of the Odwalla trademark and $33 million related to the cost of discontinuing the Odwalla juice business.
Operating income (loss) and income (loss) before income taxes were reduced by $145 million and $153 million, respectively, for Corporate, $31 million and $30 million, respectively, for Asia Pacific, $21 million and $26 million, respectively, for Bottling Investments, and $19 million and $21 million, respectively, for Latin America due to the Company’s strategic realignment initiatives. Additionally, operating income (loss) and income (loss) before income taxes
121


were reduced by $115 million for North America, $78 million for Europe, Middle East and Africa $7and $4 million for Latin America, $241 million for North America, $10 million for Asia Pacific, $57 million for Bottling InvestmentsGlobal Ventures due to the Company’s strategic realignment initiatives. Refer to Note 18.
Operating income (loss) and $193income (loss) before income taxes were reduced by $104 million for Corporate due to the Company'sCompany’s productivity and reinvestment program. IncomeOperating income (loss) from continuing operationsand income (loss) before income taxes was also reducedwere increased by $116$5 million for CorporateEurope, Middle East and Africa due to pension settlementsthe refinement of previously established accruals related to the Company'sCompany’s productivity and reinvestment program. Refer to Note 14 and Note 19.18.
Operating income (loss) and income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes were reduced by $737$59 million and $84 million, respectively, for North America related to the restructuring of our manufacturing operations in the United States.
Operating income (loss) and income (loss) before income taxes were reduced by $55 million for Bottling InvestmentsNorth America related to the impairment of a trademark. Refer to Note 16.
Operating income (loss) and $34income (loss) before income taxes were reduced by $51 million for Corporate duerelated to asset impairment charges.the remeasurement of our contingent consideration liability to fair value in conjunction with the fairlife acquisition. Refer to Note 17.2.
OperatingIncome (loss) before income taxes was increased by $902 million for Corporate in conjunction with our fairlife acquisition, which resulted from the remeasurement of our previously held equity interest in fairlife to fair value. Refer to Note 2.
Income (loss) before income taxes was reducedincreased by $280$148 million for Corporate related to realized and unrealized gains and losses on equity securities and trading debt securities as well as realized gains and losses on available-for-sale debt securities. Refer to Note 4.
Income (loss) before income taxes was increased by $35 million for Corporate related to the sale of our ownership interest in an equity method investee and the sale of a portion of our ownership interest in another equity method investee. Refer to Note 2.
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes was reduced by $419$484 million for Bottling Investments dueCorporate related to costs incurred to refranchise certaincharges associated with the extinguishment of our bottling operations.long-term debt. Refer to Note 2.10.
Operating income (loss) and income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes were reduced by $225 million for Corporate as a result of a cash contribution we made to The Coca-Cola Foundation.
Operating income (loss) and income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes were reduced by $67 million for Corporate due to tax litigation expense. Refer to Note 12.
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes was reduced by $4 million for Europe, Middle East and Africa, $2 million for North America, $70$252 million for Bottling Investments and $16$38 million for CorporateLatin America due to other-than-temporary impairment charges related to certain of our equity method investees. Refer to Note 16.
Income (loss) before income taxes was reduced by $145 million for Bottling Investments, $70 million for Latin America and $1 million for North America due to the Company'sCompany’s proportionate share of significant operating and nonoperating items recorded by certain of our equity method investees.
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes was reduced by $2,140$26 million for Corporate due to an impairment charge associated with an investment in an equity security without a readily determinable fair value. Refer to Note 16.
In 2019, the results of our operating segments and Corporate were impacted by the following items:
Operating income (loss) and income (loss) before income taxes were reduced by $2 million for Europe, Middle East and Africa, $1 million for Latin America, $62 million for North America, $5 million for Bottling Investments and $194 million for Corporate due to the Company’s productivity and reinvestment program. Refer to Note 18.
Operating income (loss) and income (loss) before income taxes were reduced by $95 million for Bottling Investments due to costs incurred to refranchise certain of our North America bottling operations.
Operating income (loss) and income (loss) before income taxes were reduced by $46 million for Corporate related to transaction costs associated with the purchase of Costa, which we acquired in January 2019. Refer to Note 2.
Operating income (loss) and income (loss) before income taxes were reduced by $42 million for Asia Pacific due to an impairment charge related to a trademark.
Income (loss) before income taxes was increased by $739 million for Corporate as a result of the sale of a retail and office building in New York City.
Income (loss) before income taxes was increased by $250 million for Corporate related to realized and unrealized gains and losses on equity securities and trading debt securities as well as realized gains and losses on available-for-sale debt securities. Refer to Note 4.
122


Income (loss) before income taxes was increased by $73 million for Bottling Investments due to the refranchising of certain bottling operations in India. Refer to Note 2.
Income (loss) before income taxes was increased by $39 million for Corporate related to the sale of a portion of our ownership interest in Andina. Refer to Note 2.
Income (loss) before income taxes was reduced by $406 million for Bottling Investments, $255 million for Europe, Middle East and Africa, $57 million for North America and $49 million for Latin America due to other-than-temporary impairment charges related to certain of our equity method investees.
Income (loss) before income taxes was reduced by $160 million for Corporate as a result of CCBA asset adjustments. Refer to Note 2.
Income (loss) before income taxes was reduced by $118 million for Corporate resulting from a net loss in conjunction with our acquisition of the remaining ownership interest in CHI. Refer to Note 2.
Income (loss) before income taxes was reduced by $105 million for Bottling Investments due to the refranchising of certain bottling territories in North America. Refer to Note 2.
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes was increased by $445 million for Corporate due to a gain recognized resulting from the merger of CCW and CCEJ. Refer to Note 18.
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes was reduced by $313$98 million for North America primarily related to payments made to convert the bottling agreements for certain North America bottling partners' territories to a single form of CBA with additional requirements. Refer to Note 2.
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes was increased by $150 million for Corporate related to the remeasurement of our previously held equity interests in CCBABottling Investments and its South African subsidiary to fair value. Refer to Note 2.
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes was increased by $88 million for Corporate due to a gain recognized upon refranchising our China bottling operations and selling a related cost method investment. Refer to Note 2.
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes was reduced by $50 million for Corporate due to an other-than-temporary impairment charge related to one of our international equity method investees. Refer to Note 17.
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes was reduced by $38$2 million for Corporate due to the early extinguishment of long-term debt. Refer to Note 11.
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes was reduced by $26 million for Corporate due to a charge related to our former German bottling operations.
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes was increased by $25 million for Corporate due to Coca‑Cola FEMSA, an equity method investee, issuing additional shares of its stock during the period at a per share amount greater than the carrying value of the Company's per share investment. Refer to Note 17.
In 2016, the results of our operating segments and Corporate were impacted by the following items:
Operating income (loss) and income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes were reduced by $32 million for Europe, Middle East and Africa, $134 million for North America, $1 million for Asia Pacific, $322 million for Bottling Investments and $105 million for Corporate and increased by $2 million for Latin America due to the Company's productivity and reinvestment program, including refinements to prior period accruals. Refer to Note 19.


Operating income (loss) was reduced by $276 million and income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes was reduced by $297 million for Bottling Investments due to costs incurred to refranchise certain of our bottling operations. Refer to Note 2.
Operating income (loss) and income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes were reduced by $200 million for Corporate as a result of cash contributions to The Coca-Cola Foundation.
Operating income (loss) and income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes were reduced by $153 million for Bottling Investments due to impairment charges recorded on certain of the Company's intangible assets.
Operating income (loss) and income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes were reduced by $76 million for Latin America due to the write-down we recorded related to our receivables from our bottling partner in Venezuela due to changes in exchange rates. Refer to Note 1.
Operating income (loss) and income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes were reduced by $9 million for Bottling Investments and $32 million for Corporate related to noncapitalizable transaction costs associated with pending and closed transactions.
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes was reduced by $118 million for Bottling Investments due to pension settlement charges primarily as a result of our refranchising activities. Refer to Note 14.
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes was reduced by $52 million for Bottling Investments and $9 million for Corporate due to the Company'sCompany’s proportionate share of significant operating and nonoperating items recorded by certain of our equity method investees.
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes was reduced by $2,456 million for Bottling Investments primarily due to the refranchising of certain bottling territories in North America. Refer to Note 2.
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes was increased by $1,323 million for Corporate as a result of the deconsolidation of our German bottling operations. Refer to Note 2.
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes was reduced by $72 million for Corporate as a result of remeasuring our net monetary assets denominated in Egyptian pounds. Refer to Note 18.
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes was reduced by $31 million for North America related to payments made to convert the bottling agreements for certain North America bottling partners' territories to a single form of CBA with additional requirements. Refer to Note 2.
NOTE 21: 20: NET CHANGE IN OPERATING ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities attributable to the net change in operating assets and liabilities iswas composed of the following (in millions):
Year Ended December 31,202120202019
(Increase) decrease in trade accounts receivable1
$(225)$882 $(158)
(Increase) decrease in inventories(135)99 (183)
(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses and other current assets(241)78 (87)
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued expenses2
2,843 (860)1,318 
Increase (decrease) in accrued income taxes3
(566)(16)96 
Increase (decrease) in other noncurrent liabilities4
(351)507 (620)
Net change in operating assets and liabilities$1,325 $690 $366 
Year Ended December 31,2018
 2017
 2016
(Increase) decrease in trade accounts receivable$66
 $(141) $(28)
(Increase) decrease in inventories(171) (355) (142)
(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses and other assets(221) 506
 279
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued expenses(289) (445) (540)
Increase (decrease) in accrued income taxes(12) (153) 750
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities1
(575) 4,052
 (544)
Net change in operating assets and liabilities$(1,202) $3,464
 $(225)
1The increase in other liabilitiestrade accounts receivable in 20172021 was primarily due to improved business performance. The decrease in trade accounts receivable in 2020 was primarily due to the one-time transition tax required byimpact of the Tax Reform Act signed into law on
December 22, 2017.COVID-19 pandemic and the start of a trade accounts receivable factoring program. Refer to Note 15.

1 for additional information on the factoring program.
NOTE 22: SUBSEQUENT EVENT
On January 3, 2019,2The increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses in 2021 was primarily driven by an increase in trade accounts payable, higher marketing accruals, BodyArmor acquisition-related accruals and higher annual incentive accruals. The decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses in 2020 was primarily driven by the Company acquired Costa in exchange for $4.9 billion of cash. Costa is a coffee company with retail outlets in over 30 countries, a coffee vending operation, for-home coffee formats and a state-of-the-art roastery. We believe this acquisition will allow us to increase our presence in the hot beverages market platform. We are currently in the process of finalizing the accounting for this transaction and expect to complete our preliminary allocationimpact of the purchase considerationCOVID-19 pandemic and lower annual incentive accruals. Refer to Note 2 for information regarding the BodyArmor acquisition.
3The decrease in accrued income taxes in 2021 was primarily driven by increased tax payments in 2021. Refer to Note 14.
4The increase in other noncurrent liabilities in 2020 was primarily due to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed byincrease in income tax reserves related to the end oflitigation with the first quarter of 2019.     IRS. Refer to Note 11.
123


REPORT OF MANAGEMENT
Management'sManagement’s Responsibility for the Financial Statements
Management of the Company is responsible for the preparation and integrity of the consolidated financial statements appearing in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. The financial statements were prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States appropriate in the circumstances and, accordingly, include certain amounts based on our best judgments and estimates. Financial information in this Annual Report on Form 10-Kreport is consistent with that in the financial statements.
Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining a system of internal controls and procedures to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the consolidated financial statements. Our internal control system is supported by a program of internal audits and appropriate reviews by management, written policies and guidelines, careful selection and training of qualified personnel, and a written Code of Business Conduct adopted by our Company'sCompany’s Board of Directors, applicable to all officers and employees of our Company and subsidiaries. In addition, our Company'sCompany’s Board of Directors adopted a written Code of Business Conduct for Non-Employee Directors which reflects the same principles and values as our Code of Business Conduct for officers and employees but focuses on matters of relevance to non-employee Directors.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements and, even when determined to be effective, can only provide reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management'sManagement’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("(“Exchange Act"Act”). Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company'sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018.2021. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 Framework) ("COSO"(“COSO”) in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework. Based on this assessment, management believes that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018.2021.
The Company'sCompany’s independent auditors, Ernst & Young LLP, a registered public accounting firm, are appointed by the Audit Committee of the Company'sour Company’s Board of Directors, subject to ratification by our Company'sCompany’s shareowners. Ernst & Young LLP has audited and reported on the consolidated financial statements of The Coca-Cola Company and subsidiaries and the Company'sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting. The reports of the independent auditors are contained in this annual report.












Audit Committee'sCommittee’s Responsibility
The Audit Committee of our Company'sCompany’s Board of Directors, composed solely of Directors who are independent in accordance with the requirements of the New York Stock Exchange listing standards, the Exchange Act, and the Company'sCompany’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, meets with the independent auditors, management and internal auditors periodically to discuss internal controls andalong with auditing and financial reporting matters. The Audit Committee reviews with the independent auditors the scope and results of the audit effort. The Audit Committee also meets periodically with the independent auditors and the chief internal auditor without management present to ensure that the independent auditors and the chief internal auditor have free access to the Audit Committee. Our Audit Committee'sCommittee’s Report can be found in the Company's 2019Company’s 2022 Proxy Statement.
124


ko-20211231_g3.jpg
image4a05.jpgko-20211231_g4.jpg
James R. QuinceyLarry M. MarkJohn Murphy
Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer

February 21, 201922, 2022
Vice President and Controller
February 21, 2019
image2a05.jpg
image5a05.jpg
Kathy N. WallerMark Randazza
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

February 21, 201922, 2022
ko-20211231_g5.jpg
ko-20211231_g6.jpg
Kathy LovelessMark Randazza
Vice President and Controller
February 22, 2022
Vice President, Assistant Controller and Chief Accounting Officer

February 21, 201922, 2022

125




Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


Board of Directors and Shareowners
The Coca-Cola Company


    
Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of The Coca-Cola Company and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, shareowners’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018,2021, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial“consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company as of December 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018,2021, in conformity with USU.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal controlscontrol over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018,2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) and our report dated February 21, 201922, 2022 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Basis for Opinion


These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures include examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.



Critical Audit Matters


image7a05.jpgThe critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
Accounting for uncertain tax positions
Description of the Matter
As described in Note 11 and Note 14 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements, the Company is involved in various income tax matters for which the ultimate outcomes are uncertain. As of December 31, 2021, the gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits was $906 million. As described in Note 11, on September 17, 2015 the Company received a Statutory Notice of Deficiency from the Internal Revenue Service for the tax years 2007 through 2009 in the amount of $3.3 billion for the period. On November 18, 2020, the U.S. Tax Court issued an opinion predominantly siding with the IRS related to the Company’s transfer pricing between its U.S. parent company and certain of its foreign affiliates for tax years 2007 through 2009.
While the Company continues to disagree with the IRS positions and the portions of the opinion affirming such positions, it is possible that some portion or all of the adjustment proposed by the IRS could ultimately be upheld. As a result of the application of ASC 740, Accounting for Income Taxes, the Company has recorded a tax reserve of $400 million for this matter as of December 31, 2021.
Auditing management’s evaluation of uncertain tax positions, including the uncertain tax position associated with the IRS notice and opinion, was especially challenging due to the level of subjectivity and significant judgment associated with the recognition and measurement of the tax positions that are more likely than not to be sustained.

126


How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit
We obtained an understanding, evaluated the design, and tested the effectiveness of controls over the Company’s accounting process for uncertain tax positions. Our procedures included testing controls addressing the completeness of uncertain tax positions, controls relating to the identification and recognition of the uncertain tax positions, controls over the measurement of the unrecognized tax benefit, and controls over the identification of developments related to existing uncertain tax positions.
Our audit procedures included, among others, evaluating the assumptions the Company used to assess its uncertain tax positions and related unrecognized tax benefit amounts by jurisdiction. We also tested the completeness and accuracy of the underlying data used in the identification and measurement of uncertain tax positions. We evaluated evidence of management’s assessment of the opinion, including inquiries of tax counsel, inspection of technical memos, and written representations of management. We involved professionals with specialized skill and knowledge to assist in our evaluation of the tax technical merits of the Company’s assessment, including the assessment of whether the tax positions are more likely than not to be sustained, the amount of the potential benefits to be realized, and the application of relevant tax law. We also assessed the Company’s disclosure of uncertain tax positions included in Note 11 and Note 14.
Valuation of trademarks with indefinite lives and goodwill
Description of the Matter
As described in Note 1 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements, the Company performs an annual impairment test ofits indefinite-lived intangible assets, including trademarks with indefinite lives and goodwill, or more frequently if events or circumstances indicate that assets might be impaired. Each impairment test may be qualitative or quantitative. Trademarks with indefinite lives and goodwill were $14.5 billion and $19.4 billion, respectively, as of December 31, 2021.
Auditing the valuation oftrademarks with indefinite lives and reporting units with goodwill involved complex judgment due to the significant estimation required in determining the fair value of the trademarks with indefinite lives and related reporting units with goodwill, respectively. Specifically, the fair value estimates were sensitive to significant assumptions about future market and economic conditions. Significant assumptions used in the Company’s fair value estimates included sales volume, pricing, royalty rates, long-term growth rates, and cost of capital, as applicable.
How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit
We obtained an understanding, evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of controls over the Company’s annual impairment tests for trademarks with indefinite lives and reporting units with goodwill. For example, we tested management’s risk assessment process to determine whether to perform a quantitative or qualitative test and management’s review controls over the valuation models and underlying assumptions used to develop such estimates. For impairment tests of reporting units with goodwill, we also tested controls over the determination of the carrying value of the reporting units. We tested the estimated fair values of the trademarks with indefinite lives and reporting units with goodwill based on our risk assessments.
Our audit procedures included, among others, comparing significant judgmental inputs to observable third party and industry sources, considering other observable market transactions, and evaluating the reasonableness of management’s projected financial information by comparing to third party industry projections, third party economic growth projections, and other internal and external data. We performed sensitivity analyses of certain significant assumptions to evaluate the change in the fair value of the trademarks with indefinite lives and reporting units with goodwill and also assessed the historical accuracy of management’s estimates. In addition, we involved specialists to assist in our evaluation of certain significant assumptions used in the Company’s discounted cash flow analyses. We also assessed the Company’s disclosure of its annual impairment tests included in Note 1.



/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
We have served as the Company'sCompany’s auditor since 1921.

Atlanta, Georgia
February 21, 201922, 2022

127





Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm




Board of Directors and Shareowners
The Coca-Cola Company


Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting


We have audited The Coca-Cola Company and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018,2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, The Coca-Cola Company and subsidiaries (the Company) maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20182021, based on the COSO criteria.


We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, shareowners'shareowners’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018,2021, and the related notes and our report dated February 21, 201922, 2022 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.


Basis for Opinion


The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company'sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.


We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.


Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.


Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Overover Financial Reporting


A company'scompany’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company'scompany’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company'scompany’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.


Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.





image7a05.jpg/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
February 21, 2019


Quarterly Data (Unaudited)22, 2022
128
 
First
Quarter

 
Second
Quarter

 
Third
Quarter

 
Fourth
Quarter

 Full Year
 
(In millions except per share data)          
2018          
Net operating revenues$7,626
 $8,927
 $8,245
 $7,058
 $31,856
 
Gross profit4,888
 5,675
 5,186
 4,337
 20,086
 
Net income attributable to shareowners of
   The Coca-Cola Company
1,368
 2,316
 1,880
 870
 6,434
 
Basic net income per share$0.32
 $0.54
 $0.44
 $0.20
 $1.51
1 
Diluted net income per share$0.32
 $0.54
 $0.44
 $0.20
 $1.50
 
2017          
Net operating revenues$9,118
 $9,702
 $9,078
 $7,512
 $35,410
 
Gross profit5,605
 6,043
 5,684
 4,823
 22,155
 
Net income (loss) attributable to shareowners of
   The Coca-Cola Company
1,182
 1,371
 1,447
 (2,752) 1,248
 
Basic net income (loss) per share$0.28
 $0.32
 $0.34
 $(0.65) $0.29
 
Diluted net income (loss) per share$0.27
 $0.32
 $0.33
 $(0.65) $0.29
1 
1
The sum of the quarterly net income (loss) per share amounts does not agree to the full year net income per share amounts. We calculate net income (loss) per share based on the weighted-average number of outstanding shares during the reporting period. The average number of shares fluctuates throughout the year and can therefore produce a full year result that does not agree to the sum of the individual quarters.
Our first quarter, second quarter and third quarter reporting periods end on the Friday closest to the last day of the applicable quarterly calendar period. Our fourth quarter and fiscal year end on December 31 regardless of the day of the week on which December 31 falls.
During 2018 and 2017, our quarterly operating results were impacted by acquisition and divestiture activities. Refer to Note 2.
The Company's first quarter 2018 results were impacted by one less day compared to the first quarter of 2017. Furthermore, the Company recorded the following transactions which impacted results:
Charges of $390 million related to the impairment of certain assets. Refer to Note 17.
Charges of $95 million due to the Company's productivity and reinvestment program. Refer to Note 19.
A net loss of $85 million related to realized and unrealized gains and losses on equity securities and trading debt securities as well as realized gains and losses on available-for-sale debt securities. Refer to Note 4.
A net charge of $51 million related to the Company's proportionate share of significant operating and nonoperating items recorded by certain of our equity method investees.
Charges of $45 million related to costs incurred to refranchise certain of our North America bottling operations.
A net loss of $33 million primarily related to the reversal of the cumulative translation adjustments resulting from the substantial liquidation of the Company's former Russian juice operations.
Charges of $19 million primarily related to payments made to convert the bottling agreements for certain North America bottling partners' territories to a single form of CBA with additional requirements. Refer to Note 2.
In the second quarter of 2018, the Company recorded the following transactions which impacted results:
Charges of $150 million due to the Company's productivity and reinvestment program. Refer to Note 19.
Charges of $102 million due to the refranchising of certain bottling territories in North America. Refer to Note 2.
Charges of $60 million related to the impairment of certain assets. Refer to Note 17.

An other-than-temporary impairment charge of $52 million related to one of our international equity method investees. Refer to Note 17.
Charges of $47 million related to pension settlements as a result of North America refranchising. Refer to Note 14.
A net gain of $36 million related to the refranchising of our Latin American bottling operations. Refer to Note 2.


A net gain of $36 million related to realized and unrealized gains and losses on equity securities and trading debt securities as well as realized gains and losses on available-for-sale debt securities. Refer to Note 4.
Charges of $34 million related to costs incurred to refranchise certain of our North America bottling operations.
A net charge of $33 million related to the Company's proportionate share of significant operating and nonoperating items recorded by certain of our equity method investees.
Charges of $22 million related to tax litigation expense. Refer to Note 12.
In the third quarter of 2018, the Company recorded the following transactions which impacted results:
A net gain of $370 million related to the sale of our equity ownership in Lindley. Refer to Note 2.
Charges of $275 million due to the refranchising of certain bottling territories in North America. Refer to Note 2.
An other-than-temporary impairment charge of $205 million related to our equity method investee in Indonesia. Refer to Note 17.
Charges of $132 million due to the Company's productivity and reinvestment program. Refer to Note 19.
A net gain of $64 million related to realized and unrealized gains and losses on equity securities and trading debt securities as well as realized gains and losses on available-for-sale debt securities. Refer to Note 4.
A gain of $41 million related to economic hedging activity associated with the purchase of Costa, which we acquired on January 3, 2019. Refer to Note 6.
Charges of $38 million related to costs incurred to refranchise certain of our North America bottling operations.
A net gain of $27 million related to the early extinguishment of long-term debt. Refer to Note 11.
A net gain of $19 million related to the Company's proportionate share of significant operating and nonoperating items recorded by certain of our equity method investees.
Charges of $12 million primarily related to payments made to convert the bottling agreements for certain North America bottling partners' territories to a single form of CBA with additional requirements. Refer to Note 2.
A gain of $11 million related to the refranchising of our Latin American bottling operations. Refer to Note 2.
The Company's fourth quarter 2018 results were impacted by one additional day compared to the fourth quarter of 2017. Furthermore, the Company recorded the following transactions which impacted results:
Other-than-temporary impairment charges of $334 million related to certain of our equity method investees in the Middle East. Refer to Note 17.
A net loss of $293 million related to realized and unrealized gains and losses on equity securities and trading debt securities as well as realized gains and losses on available-for-sale debt securities. Refer to Note 4.
Charges of $131 million due to the Company's productivity and reinvestment program. Refer to Note 19.
A net loss of $120 million related to economic hedging activity associated with the purchase of Costa, which we acquired on January 3, 2019. Refer to Note 6.
Charges of $102 million related to pension settlements as a result of North America refranchising. Refer to Note 14.
Charges of $97 million due to the refranchising of certain bottling territories in North America. Refer to Note 2.
A loss of $74 million related to the sale of our equity ownership in Lindley. Refer to Note 2.
A net charge of $46 million related to the Company's proportionate share of significant operating and nonoperating items recorded by certain of our equity method investees.
A net loss of $32 million related to acquiring a controlling interest in the Philippine bottling operations. Refer to Note 2.
Charges of $22 million related to costs incurred to refranchise certain of our North America bottling operations.
In the first quarter of 2017, the Company recorded the following transactions which impacted results:
Charges of $497 million due to the refranchising of certain bottling territories in North America. Refer to Note 2.
Charges of $139 million due to the Company's productivity and reinvestment program. Refer to Note 19.
Charges of $106 million primarily related to payments made to convert the bottling agreements for certain North America bottling partners' territories to a single form of CBA with additional requirements. Refer to Note 2.


Charges of $104 million related to the impairment of certain intangible assets. Refer to Note 17.
A net charge of $58 million related to the Company's proportionate share of significant operating and nonoperating items recorded by certain of our equity method investees.
Charges of $60 million related to costs incurred to refranchise certain of our bottling operations.
In the second quarter of 2017, the Company recorded the following transactions which impacted results:
Charges of $667 million related to the impairment of certain intangible assets. Refer to Note 17.
A gain of $445 million related to the integration of CCW and CCEJ to establish CCBJHI. Refer to Note 18.
Charges of $214 million due to the refranchising of certain bottling territories in North America. Refer to Note 2.
Charges of $109 million primarily related to payments made to convert the bottling agreements for certain North America bottling partners' territories to a single form of CBA with additional requirements. Refer to Note 2.
Charges of $87 million due to the Company's productivity and reinvestment program. Refer to Note 19.
Charges of $44 million related to costs incurred to refranchise certain of our bottling operations.
A net charge of $38 million related to the early extinguishment of long-term debt. Refer to Note 11.
A net gain of $37 million related to the Company's proportionate share of significant operating and nonoperating items recorded by certain of our equity method investees.
A gain of $9 million related to refranchising a substantial portion of our China bottling operations. Refer to Note 2.
In the third quarter of 2017, the Company recorded the following transactions which impacted results:
Charges of $762 million due to the refranchising of certain bottling territories in North America. Refer to Note 2.
Charges of $213 million related to costs incurred to refranchise certain of our bottling operations.
Charges of $129 million due to the Company's productivity and reinvestment program. Refer to Note 19.
A gain of $79 million related to the refranchising of our remaining China bottling operations and related cost method investment. Refer to Note 2.
Charges of $72 million primarily related to payments made to convert the bottling agreements for certain North America bottling partners' territories to a single form of CBA with additional requirements. Refer to Note 2.
An other-than-temporary impairment charge of $50 million related to one of our international equity method investees. Refer to Note 17.
A net charge of $16 million related to the Company's proportionate share of significant operating and nonoperating items recorded by certain of our equity method investees.
In the fourth quarter of 2017, the Company recorded the following transactions which impacted results:
A net provisional tax charge of $3,610 million as a result of the Tax Reform Act that was signed into law on December 22, 2017. Refer to Note 15.
Charges of $667 million due to the refranchising of certain bottling territories in North America. Refer to Note 2.
Charges of $295 million due to the Company's productivity and reinvestment program. Refer to Note 19.
A charge of $225 million as a result of a cash contribution we made to The Coca-Cola Foundation.
A gain of $150 million related to the remeasurement of our previously held equity interests in CCBA and its South African subsidiary to fair value. Refer to Note 2.
Charges of $105 million related to costs incurred to refranchise certain of our bottling operations.
A net charge of $55 million related to the Company's proportionate share of significant operating and nonoperating items recorded by certain of our equity method investees.
Charges of $26 million primarily related to payments made to convert the bottling agreements for certain North America bottling partners' territories to a single form of CBA with additional requirements. Refer to Note 2.



ITEM 9.  CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
Not applicable.
ITEM 9A.  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company, under the supervision and with the participation of its management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company's "disclosureCompany’s “disclosure controls and procedures"procedures” (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended ("Exchange Act"))Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company'sCompany’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2018.2021.
Report of Management on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and Attestation Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The report of management on our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20182021 and the attestation report of our independent registered public accounting firm on our internal control over financial reporting are set forth in Part II, "Item“Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data"Data” in this report.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in the Company'sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 20182021 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company'sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 9B.  OTHER INFORMATION
Not applicable.

PARTITEM 9C.  DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS
Not applicable.
Part III
ITEM 10.  DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The information regarding Director Nominationswith respect to Directors under the subheading "Itemsubheadings “Item 1 Election of Directors"Directors,” “Board Membership Criteria,” “Director Nomination Process” and “Biographical Information About Our Director Nominees” under the principal heading "Governance,"“Governance,” the information regarding the Codes of Business Conduct under the subheading "Additional“Additional Governance Matters"Matters” under the principal heading "Governance," the information under the subheading "Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance" under the principal heading "Share Ownership"“Governance,” and the information regarding the Audit Committee under the subheading "Board“Board and Committee Governance"Governance” under the principal heading "Governance"“Governance” in the Company's 2019Company’s 2022 Proxy Statement isare incorporated herein by reference. See Item X in Part I of this report for information regarding executive officers of the Company.
ITEM 11.  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information under the subheading "Director Compensation"“Director Compensation” under the principal heading "Governance"“Governance,” the information under the subheadings “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” “Compensation Committee Report,” “Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation,” “Compensation Tables,” “Payments on Termination or Change in Control” and “Pay Ratio Disclosure” under the principal heading “Compensation,” and the information under the subheadings "Compensation Discussion and Analysis," "Reportsubheading “Annex B — Summary of the Compensation Committee," "Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation," "Compensation Tables," "Payments on Termination or Change in Control" and "Pay Ratio Disclosure"Plans” under the principal heading "Compensation" and the information in "Annex B — Summary of Plans"“Annexes” in the Company's 2019Company’s 2022 Proxy Statement isare incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 12.  SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The information under the subheading "Equity“Equity Compensation Plan Information"Information” under the principal heading "Compensation"“Compensation” and the information under the subheading "Ownership of Equity Securities of the Company" under the principal heading "Share Ownership"“Share Ownership” in the Company's 2019Company’s 2022 Proxy Statement isare incorporated herein by reference.

129


ITEM 13.  CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
The information under the subheading "Director“Director Independence and Related Person Transactions"Transactions” under the principal heading
"Governance"“Governance” in the Company's 2019Company’s 2022 Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 14.  PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
The information regarding Audit Fees, Audit-Related Fees, Tax Fees, All Other Fees and Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services of Independent Auditors under the subheading "Item“Item 3 Ratification of the Appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as Independent Auditors"Auditors” under the principal heading "Audit Matters"“Audit Matters” in the Company's 2019Company’s 2022 Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.


PARTPart IV
ITEM 15.  EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a)The following documents are filed as part of this report:
(a)The following documents are filed as part of this report:
1.Financial Statements:
Consolidated Statements of Income — Years Ended December 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016.2019.
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income — Years Ended December 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016.2019.
Consolidated Balance Sheets — December 31, 20182021 and 2017.2020.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows — Years Ended December 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016.2019.
Consolidated Statements of Shareowners'Shareowners’ Equity — Years Ended December 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016.2019.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.
2.Financial Statement Schedules:
The schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"(“SEC”) are not required under the related instructions or are inapplicable and, therefore, have been omitted.
3.ExhibitsExhibits:
In reviewing the agreements included as exhibits to this report, please remember they are included to provide you with information regarding their terms and are not intended to provide any other factual or disclosure information about the Company or the other parties to the agreements. The agreements contain representations, warranties, covenants and conditions by or of each of the parties to the applicable agreement. These representations, warranties, covenants and conditions have been made solely for the benefit of the other parties to the applicable agreement and:
should not in all instances be treated as categorical statements of fact, but rather as a way of allocating the risk to one of the parties if those statements prove to be inaccurate;
may have been qualified by disclosures that were made to the other party in connection with the negotiation of the applicable agreement, which disclosures are not necessarily reflected in the agreement;
may apply standards of materiality in a way that is different from what may be viewed as material to you or other investors; and
were made only as of the date of the applicable agreement or such other date or dates as may be specified in the agreement and are subject to more recent developments.
Accordingly, these representations and warranties may not describe the actual state of affairs as of the date they were made or at any other time. Additional information about the Company may be found elsewhere in this report and the Company'sCompany’s other public filings, which are available without charge through the SEC'sSEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov.



130


EXHIBIT INDEX
(With regard to applicable cross-references in the list of exhibits below, the Company'sCompany’s Current, Quarterly and Annual Reports are filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC")SEC under File No. 001-02217; and Coca-Cola Refreshments USA, Inc.'s’s (formerly known as Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc.) Current, Quarterly and Annual Reports are filed with the SEC under File No. 001-09300).
4.2As permitted by the rules of the SEC, the Company has not filed certain instruments defining the rights of holders of long-term debt of the Company or consolidated subsidiaries under which the total amount of securities authorized does not exceed 10 percent of the total assets of the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries. The Company agrees to furnish to the SEC, upon request, a copy of any omitted instrument.




4.32
131


4.39Indenture, dated as of July 30, 1991, between Coca-Cola Refreshments USA, Inc. and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee — incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Coca-Cola Refreshments USA, Inc.'s’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 30, 1991.
4.334.40
First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of January 29, 1992, to the Indenture, dated as of July 30, 1991, between Coca-Cola Refreshments USA, Inc. and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee —incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.01 to Coca-Cola Refreshments USA, Inc.'s’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 29, 1992.



132











.
133




134


135









136













137




101
The following financial information from The Coca-Cola Company'sCompany’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018,2021, formatted in XBRL (eXtensibleiXBRL (Inline Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, (iii) Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, (v) Consolidated Statements of Shareowners'Shareowners’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 20162019, and (vi) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.



104Cover Page Interactive Data File (the cover page XBRL tags are embedded within the iXBRL document).

*
Management contracts and compensatory plans and arrangements required to be filed as exhibits pursuant to Item 15(b) of Form 10-K.


*    Management contracts and compensatory plans and arrangements required to be filed as exhibits pursuant to Item 15(b) of Form 10-K.


ITEM 16.  FORM 10-K SUMMARY
None.
138
SIGNATURES


Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
THE COCA-COLA COMPANY
(Registrant)
THE COCA-COLA COMPANYBy:
(Registrant)
By:/s/ JAMES QUINCEY
James R. Quincey

Chairman of the Board of Directors and
Chief Executive Officer

Date:February 21, 201922, 2022

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
/s/ JAMES QUINCEY/s/ KATHY N. WALLERJOHN MURPHY
James R. Quincey

Chairman of the Board of Directors and
Chief Executive Officer and a Director

(Principal Executive Officer)
Kathy N. Waller
John Murphy
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)
February 21, 201922, 2022February 21, 201922, 2022
/s/ LARRY M. MARKKATHY LOVELESS/s/ MARK RANDAZZA
Larry M. Mark
Kathy Loveless
Vice President and Controller

(On behalf of the Registrant)
Mark Randazza

Vice President, Assistant Controller and Chief Accounting Officer

(Principal Accounting Officer)
February 21, 201922, 2022February 21, 201922, 2022
**
Muhtar Kent
Chairman of the Board of Directors and a Director
Ana Botín
Director
February 21, 2019February 21, 2019
**
Herbert A. Allen
III
Director
Richard M. Daley
Director
February 21, 2019February 21, 2019
**
Ronald W. Allen
Director
Christopher C. Davis

Director
February 21, 201922, 2022February 21, 201922, 2022
**
Marc Bolland

Director
Barry Diller

Director
February 21, 201922, 2022February 21, 201922, 2022
**
Ana Botín
Director
Helene D. Gayle
Director
February 22, 2022February 22, 2022



139


**
Alexis M. Herman
Director
Caroline J. Tsay
Director
February 22, 2022February 22, 2022
**
Robert A. Kotick
Director
David B. Weinberg
Director
February 22, 2022February 22, 2022
*
Maria Elena Lagomasino
Director
*February 22, 2022*
Helene D. Gayle
Director
Sam Nunn
Director
February 21, 2019February 21, 2019
**
Alexis M. Herman
Director
Caroline Tsay
Director
February 21, 2019February 21, 2019
**
Robert A. Kotick
Director
David B. Weinberg
Director
February 21, 2019February 21, 2019
*
Maria Elena Lagomasino
Director
February 21, 2019


*By:/s/ JENNIFER MANNING
Jennifer Manning
Attorney-in-fact
February 21, 201922, 2022


166140