Table of Contents

 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
x
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For The Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 20152018
OR
oTRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission File Number: 1-4639
CTS CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 Indiana   35-0225010 
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 
(IRS Employer
Identification Number)
       
1142 West Beardsley4925 Indiana Avenue, Elkhart, INLisle, IL
 (Address of principal executive offices)
 
4651460532
 (Zip Code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: 574-523-3800630-577-8800
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each Class Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
Common stock, without par value New York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes ¨     No x
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act.    Yes ¨    No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes x     No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    x Yes     ¨ No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.     ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer", "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer ox
 
Accelerated filer xo
 
Non-accelerated filer o
 
Smaller reporting company o
(Do not check if smaller reporting company)
Emerging growth market o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes o     No    x
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting stock held by non-affiliates of CTS Corporation, based upon the closing sales price of CTS common stock on June 28, 2015,30, 2018, was approximately $637,000,000.$1,176,000,000. There were 32,575,15432,734,227 shares of common stock, without par value, outstanding on February 19, 2016.2019.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
(1)Portions of the Proxy Statement to be filed for the annual meeting of shareholders to be held on or about May 19, 201616, 2019 are incorporated by reference in Part III.
 



Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS


      
 ITEM  PAGE 
  
   
   
   
   
   
   
  
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
  
   
   
   
   
   
  
   
  
      
 ITEM  PAGE 
  
   
   
   
   
   
   
  
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
  
   
   
   
   
   
  
   
    
    


CTS CORPORATION 1

Table of Contents

Safe Harbor
Forward-Looking Statements
This document contains statements that are, or may be deemed to be, forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, any financial or other guidance, statements that reflect our current expectations concerning future results and events, and any other statements that are not based solely on historical fact. Forward-looking statements are based on management's expectations, certain assumptions and currently available information. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof and are based on various assumptions as to future events, the occurrence of which necessarily are subject to uncertainties. These forward-looking statements are made subject to certain risks, uncertainties and other factors, which could cause our actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those presented in the forward-looking statements. Examples of factors that may affect future operating results and financial condition include, but are not limited to: changes in the economy generally and in respect to the business in which CTS operates; unanticipated issues in integrating acquisitions; the results of actions to reposition our business; rapid technological change; general market conditions in the automotive, communications,transportation, telecommunications, and computerinformation technology industries, as well as conditions in the industrial, defenseaerospace and aerospace,defense, and medical markets; reliance on key customers; unanticipated natural disasters or other events; environmental compliance and remediation expenses; the ability to protect our intellectual property; pricing pressures and demand for our products; and risks associated with our international operations, including trade and tariff barriers, exchange rates and political and geopolitical risks. Many of these, and other risks and uncertainties, are discussed in further detail in Item 1A. of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We undertake no obligation to publicly update our forward-looking statements to reflect new information or events or circumstances that arise after the date hereof, including market or industry changes.

PART I

Item 1.  Business
CTS Corporation ("CTS", "we", "our", "us" or the "Company") is a global manufacturer of sensors, electronic components, and actuators. CTS was established in 1896 as a provider of high-quality telephone products and was incorporated as an Indiana corporation in February 1929. Our principal executive offices are located in Elkhart, Indiana.Lisle, Illinois.
We design, manufacture, and sell a broad line of sensors, electronic components, and actuators primarily to original equipment manufacturers ("OEMs") for the transportation, communications,aerospace and defense, and aerospace, medical, industrial, and information technology, medical, telecommunications, and transportation markets. Our vision is to be a leading provider of sensing and motion devices as well as connectivity components, enabling an intelligent and seamless world. These devices are categorized by their ability to Sense, Connect or Move. Sense products provide vital inputs to electronic systems. Connect products allow systems to function in synchronization with other systems. Move products ensure required movements are effectively and accurately executed. We are committed to achieving our vision by continuing to invest in the development of products and technologies within these categories.
We operate manufacturing facilities located throughoutin North America, Asia, and Europe. Sales and marketing are accomplished through our sales engineers, independent manufacturers' representatives, and distributors.
On October 2, 2013, CTS sold its Electronics Manufacturing Solutions ("EMS") business to Benchmark Electronics, Inc. ("Benchmark") for approximately $75 million in cash. The sale of EMS has allowed CTS to sharpen its focus on its remaining business. The 2013 amounts in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings (Loss) related to EMS have been reported separately as discontinued operations.
See the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes included in Part II, Item 8 inof this Annual Report on Form 10-K for financial information regarding the Company.

PRODUCTS BY MAJOR MARKETS
Our products perform specific electronic functions for a given product family and are intended for use in customer assemblies. Our major products consist principally of automotive sensors and actuators used in passenger or commercial vehicles;vehicles, electronic components used in communicationstelecommunications infrastructure, information technology and other high-speed applications, switches, and potentiometers supplied to multiple markets;markets, and fabricated piezoelectric materials and substrates used primarily in medical, industrial, defenseaerospace and aerospace,defense, and information technology markets.


2 CTS CORPORATION

Table of Contents

The following table provides a breakdown of net sales by industry as a percent of consolidated net sales from continuing operations:sales:
Major Industry201820172016
(as a % of consolidated net sales)201520142013

Industry  
Transportation67%66%64%65%66%
Communications3%4%6%
Information Technology5%6%
Industrial18%17%
Medical3%2%9%8%7%
Industrial14%13%
Defense and Aerospace5%4%
Other3%
Aerospace and Defense5%4%
Telecommunications and IT4%5%6%
% of consolidated net sales100%100%
The following table identifies major products by industry. Products are sold to several industry OEMs and through distributors.
Product DescriptionTransportationCommunicationsITIndustrialMedicalIndustrial
DefenseAerospace
and
AerospaceDefense
Other
Telecom
and
IT
SENSElllll
(Controls, Pedals, Piezo Sensing Products, Sensors, Switches, Transducers)     
CONNECT llllll
(EMI/RFI Filters, Capacitors, Frequency Control, Resistors, RF filters)     
MOVEll l l
(Piezo Microactuators, Rotary Actuators, Thermal)Actuators)     


MARKETING AND DISTRIBUTION
Sales and marketing to OEMs is accomplished through our sales engineers, independent manufacturers' representatives, and distributors. We maintain sales offices in China, Czech Republic, Denmark, Germany, India, Japan, Scotland, Singapore, India, Taiwan, and the United States. Approximately 90%89% of 20152018 net sales were attributable to our sales engineers.
Our sales engineers generally service theour largest customers with application-specific products. The sales engineers work closely with major customers in designing and developing products to meet specific customer requirements.
We utilize the services of independent manufacturers' representatives for customers not serviced directly by our sales engineers. Independent manufacturers' representatives receive commissions from CTS.us. During 2015,2018, approximately 5% of net sales were attributable to independent manufacturers' representatives. We also use independent distributors. Independent distributors purchase products from CTSus for resale to customers. In 2015,2018, independent distributors accounted for approximately 5%6% of net sales.





CTS CORPORATION 3

Table of Contents


RAW MATERIALS
We utilize a wide variety of raw materials and purchased parts in our manufacturing processes. The following are the most significant raw materials and purchased components:
Conductive inks and contactors, passive electronic components, integrated circuits and semiconductors, certain rare earth elements ("REEs"), ceramic components,powders, plastic components, molding compounds, printed circuit boards and assemblies, quartz blanks and crystals, wire harness assemblies, copper, brass, silver, gold,platinum, lead, aluminum, and steel-based raw materials and components.
These raw materials and parts are purchased from several vendors,a number of suppliers, and except for certain semiconductors, REEs, and conductive inks, we generally do not believe we are dependent upon one or a limited number of vendors.suppliers. Although we purchase all of our semiconductors, REEs, and conductive inks, and silver pastes from a limited number of vendors,suppliers, alternative sources are available.

We do not currently anticipate any significant raw material shortages that would limit production. However, the lead times between the placement of orders for certain raw materials and purchased parts and actual delivery to us may vary. Occasionally, we may need to order raw materials in greater quantities and at higher-than-optimalhigher prices to compensate for the variability of lead times for delivery.

PATENTS, TRADEMARKS, AND LICENSES
We maintain a program of obtaining and protecting U.S. and non-U.S. patents relating to products that we have designed and manufactured, as well as processes and equipment used in our manufacturing technology. We were issued 1110 new U.S. patents and 1219 non-U.S. patents in 20152018 and currently hold 155147 U.S. patents and 133159 non-U.S. patents. We have 109 registered U.S. trademarks, 2220 registered foreign trademarks and two4 international trademark registrations. We have licensed the right to use several of our patents. In 2015,2018, license and royalty income was less than 1% of net sales.

MAJOR CUSTOMERS
Sales to our 15 largest customers as a percentage of total net sales were as follows:
 Year Ended December 31,
 201520142013
Total of 15 largest customers / net sales61.4%60.9%59.8%
 Years Ended December 31,
 201820172016
Total of 15 largest customers / net sales63.7%64.4%63.1%

Our net sales to significant customers as a percentage of total net sales were as follows:
Year Ended December 31,Years Ended December 31,
201520142013201820172016
Cummins Inc.15.2%13.4%9.9%
Honda Motor Co.10.7%10.8%8.4%10.5%11.2%10.7%
Toyota Motor Corporation10.1%8.4%6.3%10.5%10.2%10.4%
CTS sellsWe sell automotive parts to both Honda and Toyotathese three customers for certain vehicle platforms under purchase agreements that have no volume commitments and are subject to purchase orders issued from time to time.
No other customer accounted for 10% or more of total net sales during these periods.
CTS continuesWe continue to broaden itsour customer base. Changes in the level of our customers' orders have, in the past, had a significant impact on our operating results. If a major customer reduces the amount of business it does with us, or substantially changes the terms of that business, there could be an adverse impact on our operating results.

4 CTS CORPORATION

Table of Contents


Additionally, weWe expect to continue to depend on sales to our major customers. Because our customers are under no obligation to continue to do business with us on a long-term basis, it is possible that one or more customers may choose to work with a competitor and reduce theirits business with us. Customers may also reduce or delay their business with us because of economic or other conditions or decisions that reduce their need for our products or services. Since it is difficult to replace lost business on a timely basis, it is likely that our operating results would be adversely affected if one or more of our major customers were to cancel, delay, or reduce a large amount of business with us in the future. If one or more of our customers were to become insolvent or otherwise unable to pay for our products and/or services, our operating results, financial condition, and cash flows could be adversely affected.

ORDER BACKLOG
Order backlog representsis comprised of firm open purchase orders CTS haswe have received from its customers. Orderour customers and generally represents 1 to 2 months of sales for certain products. Our business is a mix of purchase order based business, shorter-term contracts, and multi-year awards, such as with customers who serve the automotive end market.  As such, order backlog maydoes not provide an accuratea meaningful indication of present or future revenue levels for CTS. Typically, the period between receipt of orders and expected delivery is relatively short. However, large orders from major customers may include backlog covering an extended period of time. Production scheduling and delivery for these orders could be changed or canceled by the customer on relatively short notice.sales.  
The following table shows order backlog of January 31, 2016 and January 25, 2015.
(in thousands)January 31, 2016January 25, 2015
Order backlog$65,584
$61,783
Order backlog as of the January month-end will generally be recognized into revenue during the same fiscal year.

COMPETITION
We compete with many domestic and foreign manufacturers principally on the basis of product features, technology, price, technology, quality, reliability, delivery, and service. Most of our product lines encounter significant global competition. The number of competitors varies from product line to product line. No one competitor competes with us in every product line, but many competitors are larger and more diversified than us.we are.
Some customers have reduced or plan to reduce their number of suppliers, while increasing thetheir volume of their purchases. Customers demand betterlower cost and higher quality, reliability, and delivery standards from us as well as from our competitors. These trends create opportunities for us, but also increase the risk of loss of business to competitors. We are subject to competitive risks that are typical within the electronics industry, including in some cases short product life cycles and technical obsolescence.
We believe we compete most successfully in custom engineered products manufactured to meet specific applications of major OEMs.

NON-U.S. REVENUES AND ASSETS
Our net sales to external customers originating from our non-U.S. operations as a percentage of total net sales were as follows:
 Year Ended December 31,
 201520142013
Net sales from non-U.S. operations to external customers38%42%45%
 Years Ended December 31,
 201820172016
Net sales from non-U.S. operations33%32%30%



CTS CORPORATION 5

Table of Contents


Our percentages of total assets at non-U.S. locations were as follows:
 Year Ended December 31,
 201520142013
Total assets at non-U.S. operations46%43%42%
 Years Ended December 31,
 201820172016
Total assets at non-U.S. operations46%49%48%
A substantial portion of these assets, other than cash and cash equivalents, cannot readily be liquidated. We believe the business risks to our non-U.S. operations, though substantial, are normal risks for global businesses. These risks include currency controls and changes in currency exchange rates, longer collection cycles, political and transportation risks, economic downturns and inflation, government regulations, and expropriation. Our non-U.S. manufacturing facilities are located in Canada (closed in 2015), China, Czech Republic, Denmark, India, Mexico, (Maquiladora) and Taiwan.
See Note 18 "Geographic Data" in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further geographic information .

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES
A summary of amounts spent for research and development activities is as follows:
 Year Ended December 31,
(in thousands)201520142013
Research and development$22,461
$22,563
$23,222
Ongoing research and development activity is primarily focused on expanded applications, new product development, and current product and process enhancements.
We believe a strong commitment to research and development is required for growth. Most of our research and development activities relate to developing new, innovative products and technologies to meet the current and future needs of our customers. We provide our customers with full systems support to ensure quality and reliability through all phases of design, launch, and manufacturing to meet or exceed customer requirements. Many such research and development activities benefit one or a limited number of customers or potential customers. All research and development costs are expensed as incurred.

EMPLOYEES
We employed 2,8833,230 people at December 31, 2015,2018, with 74.3%81% of these employees located outside the U.S. We employed 2,9483,222 people at December 31, 2014.2017. Approximately 190 CTS11 employees at one location in the United States were covered by two collective bargaining agreements as of December 31, 2015. One agreement, which covers 163 employees, is2018. Both agreements are scheduled to expire in 2018 and the other, which covers 27 employees, is scheduled to expire in 2016.upon completion of our 2016 Restructuring Plan activities.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
We are incorporated in the State of Indiana. Our principal corporate office is located at 1142 West Beardsley4925 Indiana Avenue Elkhart, Indiana 46514.Lisle, IL 60532.
Our internet address is www.ctscorp.com. We make available free of charge through our website our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). TheOther than the documents that we file with the SEC that are incorporated by reference herein, the information contained on or accessible through our website is not part of this or any other report we file or furnish to the SEC, other than the documents that we file with the SEC that are incorporated by reference herein.SEC.
Further, a copy of this annual report on Form 10-K is located at the SEC's Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room can be obtained by calling

6 CTS CORPORATION

Table of Contents

the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding our filings at www.sec.gov.

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE COMPANY
Executive Officers.    The following serve as executive officers of CTS as of February 24, 2016.22, 2019. The executive officers are expected to serve until the next annual shareholders meeting, of the Board of Directors, scheduled to be held on or about May 19, 2016,16, 2019, at which time the election of officers will be considered again by the Board of Directors.
Name Age Positions and Offices
Kieran O'Sullivan 5356 President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
Ashish Agrawal 4548 Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Luis Francisco Machado 5356 Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

Kieran O'Sullivan - 5356 - President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board -Board. Mr. O'Sullivan joined CTS on January 7, 2013. Before joining CTS, Mr. O'Sullivan served as Executive Vice President of Continental AG's Global Infotainment and Connectivity Business and led the NAFTA Interior Division, having joined Continental AG, a global automotive supplier, in 2006. Mr. O'Sullivan is a member of the board of directors, is chairman of the compensation committee, and is a member of the audit committee of LCI Industries, a supplier of components for manufacturers of recreational vehicles, manufactured homes, marine applications, and for the related aftermarkets of those industries.
Ashish Agrawal - 4548 - Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. On November 11, 2013, Mr. Agrawal was elected Vice President and Chief Financial Officer for CTS. Mr. Agrawal joined CTS in June 2011 as Vice President, Treasury and Corporate Development, and was elected as Treasurer on September 1, 2011. Before joining CTS, Mr. Agrawal was with Dometic Corporation, a manufacturer of refrigerators, awnings and air conditioners, as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since 2007. Prior to that, Mr. Agrawal was with General Electric Co. in various positions since December 1994.
Luis Francisco Machado - 5356 - Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary. Mr. Machado joined CTS in August 2015. Before joining CTS, Mr. Machado was at L Brands, Inc., a retailer of intimate apparel, home fragrance and beauty products under the Victoria's Secret, Pink, and Bath and Body Works Brands, as Senior Vice President, Legal and Assistant Secretary at L Brands, Inc. since August 2010, and Associate General Counsel, Corporate and Assistant Secretary of Wm. Wrigley Jr. Company since February 2006.
Information with respect to Directors and Corporate Governance may be found in our definitive proxy statement to be delivered to shareholders in connection with our 20162019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Such information is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 1A.  Risk Factors
The following are certain risk factors that could affect our business, financial condition and operating results. These risk factors should be considered in connection with evaluating the forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K or in any other reports filed or furnished by us, because these factors could cause our actual results and financial condition to differ materially from those projected in theany such forward-looking statements. Before you invest in us, you should know that making such an investment involves some risks, including the risks described below. The risks that are highlighted below are not the only ones that we face. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business, financial condition or operating results could be negatively affected.

Because we currently derive a significant portion of our revenues from a small number of customers, any decrease in orders from these customers could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.

We depend on a small number of customers for a large portion of our business, and changes in the level of our customers' orders have, in the past, had a significant impact on our results of operations. Our 15 largest customers represent a substantial portion of our sales from continuing operations. If a major customer significantly delays, reduces, or cancels the level of business it does with us, there could be an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results. Such an adverse effect would likely be material if one of our largest customers significantly reduces its level of business. Significant pricing and margin pressures exerted by a keymajor customer could also materially adversely affect our operating results. In addition, we generate significant accounts receivable from sales to our major customers. If one or more of our largestmajor customers were to become insolvent or otherwise unable to pay or were to

CTS CORPORATION 7

Table of Contents

delay payment for services,our products, our business, financial condition and operating results could be materially adversely affected.

Negative or unexpected tax consequences could adversely affect our results of operations.

We operate globally and changes in tax laws could adversely affect our results.  The international tax environment continues to change as a result of both coordinated actions by governments and unilateral measures enacted by individual countries, such as the comprehensive tax reform enacted in the U.S. in 2017, which could significantly impact our effective tax rate, tax liabilities, and ability to utilize deferred tax assets.

Adverse changes in the underlying profitability and financial outlook of our operations in several jurisdictions could lead to changes in our valuation allowances against deferred tax assets and other tax accruals that could materially and adversely affect our results of operations.
Several countries in which we operate provide tax incentives to attract and retain business. These tax incentives expire over various periods and are subject to certain conditions with which we expect to comply. Our taxes could increase if certain tax incentives are not renewed upon expiration, or tax rates applicable to us in such jurisdictions are otherwise increased. In addition, acquisitions or divestitures may cause our effective tax rate to increase.change.

We base our tax accounting positions upon the anticipated nature and conduct of our business and upon our understanding of the tax laws of the various countries in which we have assets or conduct activities. However, our tax accounting positions are subject to review and possible challenge by taxing authorities and to possible changes in law, which may have a retroactive effect. We cannot determine in advance the extent to which some jurisdictions may require us to pay taxes or make payments in lieu of taxes.

We may be unable to compete effectively against competitors.
Our industry is
The industries in which we operate are highly competitive and characterized by price erosion and rapid technological change. We compete against many domestic and foreign companies, some of which have substantially greater manufacturing, financial, research and development, and marketing resources than we do. If any customer becomes dissatisfied with our prices, quality, or timeliness of delivery, among other things, it could award business to our competitors. Moreover, some of our customers could choose to manufacture and develop particular products themselves rather than purchase them from us. Increased competition could result in price reductions, reduced profit margins and loss of market share, each of which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results. These developments also may materially adversely affect our ability to compete against these manufacturerssuccessfully going forward. We cannot assure you that our products will continue to compete successfully with our competitors' products, including OEMs.

We may be unable to keep pace with rapid technological changes that could make some of our products or processes obsolete before we realize a return on our investment.

The technologies relating to some of our products have undergone, and are continuing to undergo, rapid and significant changes. End markets for our products are characterized by technological change, frequent new product introductions and enhancements, changes in customer requirements, and emerging industry standards. The introduction of products embodying new technologies and the emergence of new industry standards could render our existing products obsolete and unmarketable before we can recover any or all of our research, development and commercialization expenses, or our capital investments. Furthermore, the life cycles of our products and the products we manufacture for others vary, may change, and are difficult to estimate.

We may experience difficulties that could delay or prevent the successful development, introduction and marketing of new products or product enhancements and our new products or product enhancements may not adequately meet the requirements of the

marketplace or achieve market acceptance. If we are unable, for technological or other reasons, to develop and market new products or product enhancements in a timely and cost-effective manner, our business, financial condition and operating results could be materially adversely affected.

Our customers may cancel their orders, change production quantities or locations or delay production.

We generally do not obtain firm, long-term purchase commitments from our customers, and have often experiencedregularly experience reduced or extended lead times in customer orders. Customers cancel orders, change production quantities and delay production for a number of reasons. Uncertain economic and geopolitical conditions may result in some of our customers delaying the delivery of some of the products we manufacture for them and placing purchase orders for lower volumes of products than previously anticipated. Cancellations, reductions or delays by a significant customer or by a number of customers may harm our results of operations by reducing the volumes of products we manufacture and sell, as well as by causing a delay in the recovery of our expenditures for inventory in preparation for customer orders, and loweror by reducing our asset utilization, resulting in lower profitability.

In addition, customers may require that manufacturing of their products be transitioned from one of our facilities to another to achieve cost reductions and other objectives. Such transfers may result in inefficiencies and costs due to

8 CTS CORPORATION

Table of Contents

resulting excess capacity and overhead at one facility and capacity constraints and the inability to fulfill all orders at another. In addition, we make significantkey decisions based on our estimates of customer requirements, including determining the levels of orders that we will seek and accept, production schedules, component procurement commitments, personnel needs and other resource requirements, based on our estimates of customer requirements. The short-term nature of our customers' commitments and the changes in demand for their products may reduce our ability to estimate future customer requirements accurately. This may make it difficult to schedule production and maximize utilization of our manufacturing capacity. Anticipated orders may not materialize and delivery schedules may be deferred as a result of changes in demand for our products or our customers' products. We often increase staffing and capacity, and incur other expenses to meet the anticipated demand of our customers, which causes reductions in our gross margins if customer orders are delayed or canceled. On occasion, customers require rapid increases in production, which may stress our resources and reduce margins. We may not have sufficient capacity at any given time to meet our customers' demands. In addition, because many of our costs and operating expenses are relatively fixed over the short-term, a reduction in customer demand could harm our gross margin and operating income until such time as adjustments can be made to activity orand operating levels andor to structural costs.

We sell products to customers in cyclical industries that are subject to significant downturns that could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

We sell products to customers in cyclical industries that have experienced economic and industry downturns. The markets for our products have softened in the past and may again soften in the future. We may face reduced end-customer demand, underutilization of our manufacturing capacity, changes in our revenue mix and other factors that could adversely affect our results of operations in the near-term. We cannot predict whether we will achieve profitability in future periods.
Because we
We derive a substantial portion of our revenues from customers in the automotive, computertransportation, information technology and communicationstelecommunications industries weand are susceptible to trends and factors affecting those industries.
Net sales
Sales to the automotive, computertransportation, information technology and communicationstelecommunications industries represent a substantial portion of our revenues. Factors negatively affecting these industries and the demand for their products also negatively affect our business, financial condition and operating results. Any adverse occurrence, including among others, industry slowdown, recession, political instability, costly or constraining regulations, budget cuts orincreased tariffs, reduced government budgets and spending, armed hostilities, terrorism, excessive inflation, prolonged disruptions in one or more of our customers' production schedules or labor disturbances, that results in significanta decline in the volume of sales in these industries, or in an overall downturn in the business and operations of our customers in these industries, could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results. Also, the automotive industry isThese industries are generally unionized and some of our customers have experienced labor disruptions in the past. Furthermore, the automotive industry isthese industries are highly cyclical in nature and sensitive to changes in general economic conditions, consumer preferences and interest rates. Some of our automotive customers have experienced financial distress. The failure of one or more automotive manufacturers that we serve may result in the failure to receive payment in full for products sold in the past and an abrupt cancellation in demand for certain products. Weakness in auto demand, the insolvency of automobile manufacturers that we serve or their suppliers, and constriction of credit markets may negatively and materially affect our facility utilization, cost structure, financial condition, and operating results.





Products we manufacture may contain design or manufacturing defects that could result in reduced demand for our products or services and liability claims against us.

Despite our quality control and quality assurance efforts, defects may occur in the products we manufacture due to design or manufacturing errors or component failure. Product defects could result in delayed shipments and reduced demand for our products. We may be subject to increased costs due to warranty claims on defective products. Product defects could result in product liability claims against us where defects cause, or are alleged to cause, property damage, bodily injury or death. As we grow our business in the automotivetransportation and medical device manufacturing markets, the risk of exposure to product liability litigation increases. We may be required to participate in a recall involving products which are, or are alleged to be, defective. We carry insurance for certain legal matters involving product liability; however, we do not have coverage for all costs related to product defects and the costs of such claims, including costs of defense and settlement, may exceed our available coverage. Accordingly, our results of operations, cash flow and financial position could be adversely affected.

CTS CORPORATION 9

Table of Contents


We are exposed to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates that may adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

We transact business in various foreign countries. We present our consolidated financial statements in U.S. dollars, but a portion of our revenues and expenditures are transacted in other currencies. As a result, we are exposed to fluctuations in foreign currencies. Additionally, we have currency exposure arising from funds held in local currencies in foreign markets.countries. Volatility in the exchange rates between the foreign currencies and the U.S. dollar could harm our business, financial condition and operating results. Furthermore, to the extent we sell our products in foreign markets, currency fluctuations may result in our products becoming too expensive for foreign customers.

Our operating results vary significantly from period to period.

We experience fluctuations in our operating results. Some of the principal factors that contribute to these fluctuations are: changes in demand for our products; our effectiveness in managing manufacturing processes, costs and timing of our component purchases so that components are available when needed for production, while mitigating the risks of purchasing inventory in excess of immediate production needs; the degree to which we are able to utilize our available manufacturing capacity; changes in the cost and availability of components, which often occur in the electronics manufacturing industry and which affect our margins and our ability to meet delivery schedules; general economic and served industry conditions; and local conditions and events that may affect our production volumes, such as labor conditions andor political instability.

We face risks relating to our international operations.

Because we have significant international operations, our operating results and financial condition could be materially adversely affected by economic, political, health, regulatory and other factors existing in foreign countries in which we operate. Our international operations are subject to inherent risks, which may materially adversely affect us, including: political and economic instability in countries in which our products are manufactured; expropriation or the imposition of government controls; changes in government regulations; export license requirements; trade restrictions; earnings repatriation and expatriation restrictions; exposure to different legal standards, including related to intellectual property; health conditions and standards; currency controls; fluctuations in exchange rates; increases in the duties and taxes we pay; inflation or deflation; greater difficulty in collecting accounts receivable and longer payment cycles; changes in labor conditions and difficulties in staffing and managing our international operations; limitations on insurance coverage against geopolitical risks, natural disasters, and business operations; and communication among and management of international operations. In addition, these same factors may also place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to some of our foreign competitors.
In addition, we
We may face risks associated with violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act ("FCPA") and similar anti-bribery laws. The FCPA and similar anti-bribery laws in other jurisdictions generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments to government officials for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. Our Code of Ethics mandates compliance with these anti-bribery laws. We operate in many parts of the world where strict compliance with anti-bribery laws may conflict with local customs and practices. We cannot assure you that our internal controls and procedures always will protect us from the detrimental actions by our employees or agents. If we are found to be liable for FCPA violations (either due to our own acts or our inadvertence or due to the acts or inadvertence of others), we could suffer from criminal or civil penalties or other sanctions, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Furthermore, we may face public
Public health or safety concerns, conditions, or restrictions that impact the availability of labor or the movement of goods in some of the countries in which we operate that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.

We may restructure our operations or fail to execute capital projects as planned, which may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.
In 2013, we
We have announced and initiated restructuring plans or capital projects at various times in the June 2013 Plan which is torecent past designed to revise and consolidate certain aspects of our operations for the purpose of improving our cost structure. The implementation of this plan resulted in the elimination of approximately 350 positions within our global operations. During the fourth quarter of 2014, CTS management amended the June 2013 Plan. The amendment added the elimination of approximately 130 additional positions and additional cost to settle CTS' U.K. pension plan. The positions eliminated will be spread globally throughout CTS businesses. The above actions were substantially complete in 2015.

10 CTS CORPORATION

Table of Contents

In 2014, we initiated a restructuring plan to consolidate our Canadian operations into other existing CTS facilities. These restructuring actions resulted in the elimination of approximately 120 positions in 2015.
structure or manufacturing efficiency. We may incur restructuring and impairment charges in the future if circumstances warrant. IfAdditionally, if we are unsuccessful in implementing restructuring plans or in executing capital projects, we may experience disruptions in our operations and higher ongoing costs, which may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

Losses in the stock market could negatively impact pension asset returns and ultimately cash flow due to possible required contributions in the future.

We make a number of assumptions relating to our pension plans in order to measure the financial position of the plans and the net periodic benefit cost. The most significant assumptions relate to the discount rate and the expected long-term return on plan assets. If these assumptions prove to be significantly different from actual rates, then we may need to record additional expense relating to the pension plans, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and could require cash contributions to fund future pension obligation payments.payments and could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

We may explore acquisitionspursue acquisition opportunities that complement or expand our business as well as divestitures of variousthat could impact our business operations. We may not be able to complete these transactions, and these transactions, if executed, may pose significant risks and maythat could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.
We intend to
On an ongoing basis we explore opportunities to buy other businesses or technologies that could complement, enhance or expand our current business or product lines or that might otherwise offer us growth opportunities. We may have difficulty finding thesesuitable opportunities or, if we do identify these opportunities, we may not be able to complete the transactions for any number of reasons including a failure to secure financing. In addition, we may not be able to successfully or profitably integrate, operate, maintain and manage our newly acquired operations or employees. Any transactions that we are able to identify and complete may involve a number of risks, including: the diversion of management's attention from our existing business to integrate the operations and personnel of the acquired or combined business or joint venture;business; possible adverse effects on our operating results during the integration process; difficulties managing and integrating operations in geographically dispersed locations; increases in our expenses and working capital requirements, which could reduce our return on invested capital; exposure to unanticipated liabilities of acquired companies; and our possible inability to achieve the intended objectives of the transaction. Even if we are initially successful in integrating a new operation, we may not be able to maintain uniform standards, controls, procedures and policies, and this may lead to operational inefficiencies. In addition, future acquisitions may result in dilutive issuances of equity securities or the incurrence of additional debt. These and other factors could harm our ability to achieve anticipated levels of profitability atfrom acquired operations or realize other anticipated benefits of an acquisition, and could adversely affect our business and operating results.

We have in the past, and may in the future, consider divesting certain business operations. Divestitures may involve a number of risks, including the diversion of management's attention, significant costs and expenses, the loss of customer relationships and cash flow, and the disruption of operations in the affected business. Failure to timely complete or consummate a divestiture may negatively affect valuation of the affected business or result in restructuring charges.

If we are unable to protect our intellectual property or we infringe, or are alleged to infringe, on another person'sothers' intellectual property rights, our business, financial condition and operating results could be materially adversely affected.

The success of our business depends, in part, upon our ability to protect trade secrets, trademarks, copyrights and patents, obtain or license patents and operate without infringing on the intellectual property rights of others. We rely on a combination of trade secrets, copyrights, patents, nondisclosure agreements and technical measures to protect our proprietary rights in our products and technology. The steps we have taken to prevent misappropriation of our technology may be inadequate. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries in which we operate do not protect our proprietary rights to the same extent as do the laws of the United States. Although we continue to evaluate and implement protective measures, there can be no assurance that these efforts will be successful. Our inability to protect our intellectual property rights could diminish or eliminate the competitive advantages that we derive from our technology, cause us to lose sales or otherwise harm our business.

We believe that patents will continue to play an important role in our business. However, there can be no assurance that we will be successful in securing patents for claims in any pending patent application or that any issued patent

CTS CORPORATION 11

Table of Contents

will provide us with any

competitive advantage. We also cannot provide assurance that the patents will not be challenged by third parties or that the patents of others will not materially adversely affect our ability to do business.

We may become involved in litigation in the future to protect our intellectual property or because others may allege that we infringed on their intellectual property. These claims and any resulting lawsuit could subject us to liability for damages and invalidate our intellectual property rights. If an infringement claim is successfully asserted by a holder of intellectual property rights, we may be required to cease marketing or selling certain products, pay penalties and spend significant time and money to develop a non-infringing product or process or to obtain licenses for the technology, process or information from the holder. We may not be successful in the development of a non-infringing alternative, or licenses may not be available on commercially acceptable terms, if at all, in which case we may lose sales and profits. In addition, any litigation could be lengthy and costly and could materially adversely affect us even if we are successful in the litigation.

We may experience shortages and increased costs of raw material and required electronic components.

Unanticipated raw material or electronic component shortages may prevent us from making scheduled shipments to customers. Our inability to make scheduled shipments could cause us to experience a shortfall in revenue, increase our costs and adversely affect our relationship with affected customers and our reputation as a reliable supplier. We may be required to pay higher prices for raw materials or electronic components in short supply and order these raw materials or electronic components in greater quantities to compensate for variable delivery times. We may also be required to pay higher prices for raw materials or electronic components due to inflationary trends regardless of supply. We are also dependent on our suppliers' ability to supply and deliver raw materials on a timely basis at negotiated prices. Any delay or inability to deliver raw materials by our suppliers may require that we attempt to mitigate such failure or fail to make deliveries to our customers on a timely basis. As a result, raw material or electronic component shortages, and price increases, or failure to perform by our suppliers could adversely affect our operating results for a particular period due to the resulting revenue shortfall andand/or increased costs.

Loss of our key management and other personnel, or an inability to attract key management and other personnel, could materially affect our business.

We depend on our senior executive officers and other key personnel to run our business. We do not have long-term employment contracts with our key personnel. The loss of any of these officers or other key personnel could adversely affect our operations. Competition for qualified employees among companies that rely heavily on engineering and technology is at times intense, and the loss of qualified employees or an inability to attract, retain and motivate additional highly skilled employees required for the operation and expansion of our business could hinder our ability to conduct research activities successfully and develop marketable products.products successfully.

We are subject to a variety of environmental, health, and safety laws and regulations that expose us to potential financial liability.

Our operations are regulated by a number of federal, state, local and foreign environmental, health, and safety (“EHS”) laws and regulations that govern, among other things, the discharge of hazardous materials into the air and water as well asemissions, worker protection, and the handling, storage and disposal of thesehazardous materials. Compliance with environmentalEHS laws and regulations is a major consideration for us because we use hazardous materials in our manufacturing processes. If we violate environmentalEHS laws orand regulations, we could be held liable for substantial fines, damages,penalties, and costs of mandated remedial actions. Our environmental permits could also be revoked or modified, which could require us to cease or limit production at one or more of our facilities, thereby materially adversely affecting our business, financial condition and operating results. EnvironmentalEHS laws and requirementsregulations have generally become more stringent over time and could continue to do so, imposing greater compliance costs and increasing risks and penalties associated with any violation, which also could materially affect our business, financial condition and operating results.
In addition, because we are a generator of hazardous wastes we may be subject to financial exposure for costs, including costs of investigation and any remediation, associated with contaminated sites at which hazardous substances from our operations have been stored, treated or disposed of. We may also be subject to exposure for such costs at sites that we currently own or operate or formerly owned or operated. Such exposure may be joint and several, so that we may be held responsible for more than our share of the contamination or even for the entire contamination.
We have been notified by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, state environmental agencies and, in some cases, generator groups of potentially responsible parties, that we are or may be a potentially responsible party regarding hazardous substancesliable for environmental contamination at several sites either owned,currently and formerly owned or operated by CTS currently or in the past,us, including sites designated as National Priorities List sites under the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Superfund sites.program. Superfund liability is joint and several and we may be held responsible for more than our share of contamination at a site. Although we estimate our potential environmental liability with respect to environmental violations or alleged violations and other environmental liabilities and reservesreserve for such matters, we cannot assure you that our reserves will be sufficient to cover the actual costs that we incur as a result of these matters.

Future events, such as the notification of potential liability at new sites, the discovery of additional contamination or other information concerning past releases of hazardous substanceschanges to an approved remedy at our manufacturingexisting sites, (or at siteschanges to which we have sent wastes for disposal), changes in

12 CTS CORPORATION

Table of Contents

existing EHS environmental laws and regulations or their interpretation, and more

rigorous effortsregulatory action by regulatorygovernment authorities, may require additional expenditures by us, to modify operations, install pollution control equipment, clean contaminated sites or curtail our operations. These expenditureswhich could have a negative impact on our operations.

In addition, we could be affected by future laws or regulations imposed in response to climate change concerns. Such laws or regulations could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operation.operations.

Our indebtedness may adversely affect our financial health.

Our debt consists of borrowings under our revolving credit facility. Our indebtedness could, among other things: increase our vulnerability to general economic and industry conditions, including recessions; require us to use cash flow from operations to service our indebtedness, thereby reducing our ability to fund working capital, capital expenditures, research and development efforts and other expenses; limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industries in which we operate; place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to competitors that have less indebtedness; or limit our ability to borrow additional funds that may be needed to operate and expand our business. Moreover, an increase in interest rates could increase our interest expense.

Our credit facility contains provisions that could materially restrict our business.

Our revolving credit facility requires us to deliver quarterly financial statements, annual financial statements, auditors certifications and compliance certificates. Additionally, the revolving credit facility contains restrictions limiting our ability to: dispose of assets; incur certain additional debt; repay other debt or amend subordinated debt instruments; create liens on assets; make investments, loans or advances; make acquisitions or engage in mergers or consolidations; engage in certain transactions with our subsidiaries and affiliates; and repurchases stockrepurchase stock; or make dividend payments above a certain amount.

The restrictions contained in our credit facility could limit our ability to plan for or react to changes in market conditions or meet capital needs or could otherwise restrict our activities or business plans. These restrictions could adversely affect our ability to finance our operations, make strategic acquisitions, fund investments or other capital needs or engage in other business activities that could be in our interest.

Further, our ability to comply with our loan covenants may be affected by events beyond our control that could result in an event of default under our credit facility, or documents governing any other existing or future indebtedness. A default, if not cured or waived, may permit acceleration of our indebtedness. In addition, our lenders could terminate their commitments to make further extensions of credit under our credit facility. If our indebtedness is accelerated, we cannot be certain that we will have sufficient funds to pay the accelerated indebtedness or that we will have the ability to refinance accelerated indebtedness on terms favorable to us, or at all.
New regulations
Regulations related to conflict minerals could adversely impact our business.

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act contains provisions to improve transparency and accountability concerning the supply of certain minerals, known as conflict minerals, originating from the Democratic Republic of Congo ("DRC") and adjoining countries. As a result, in August 2012, the SEC adopted annual disclosure and reporting requirements for those companies who may use conflict minerals mined from the DRC and adjoining countries in their products. The act requires due diligence efforts be initiated in fiscal 2013, with initial disclosure requirements beginning in May 2014. There have been and will continue to be costs associated with complying with these disclosure requirements, including diligence costs to determine the sources of minerals used in our products and other potential changes to products, processes or sources of supply to the extent necessary as a consequence of such verification activities. The implementation of theseThese rules could adversely affect the sourcing, supply and pricing of materials used in our products. As there may be only a limited number of suppliers offering conflict-free minerals, we cannot be sure that we will be able to obtain necessary conflict-free minerals from such suppliers in sufficient quantities or at competitive prices. Also, we may face reputational challenges if we determine that certain of our products contain conflict minerals or if we are unable to sufficiently verify the origins for all minerals used in our products through the procedures we may implement.

Ineffective internal control over our financial reporting may harm our business.

We are subject to the ongoing internal control provisions of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("Sarbanes-Oxley"). Our controls necessary for continued compliance with Sarbanes-Oxley may not operate effectively or at all times and may result in a material weakness. The identification of material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting could indicate a lack of proper controls to generate accurate financial statements. Further, the effectiveness

CTS CORPORATION 13

Table of Contents

of our internal controls may be impacted if we are unable to retain sufficient skilled finance and accounting personnel, especially in light of the increased demand for such personnel among publicly traded companies.


Natural disasters may adversely impact our capability to supply product to our customers.

Natural disasters, such as storms, flooding and associated power outages, occurring at any of our locations or supplier locations may lead to disruption inof our manufacturing operations and supply chain, adversely impacting our capability to supply product to our customers. In some cases,the event of a natural disaster, it may not be possible for us to find an alternate manufacturing location for certain product lines, further impacting our capability to recover from such a disruption.
Increased
We could face risks to our systems, networks and production including increased IT security threats and more sophisticated and targeted computer crime could pose a risk to our systems, networks and products.crime.

Increased global information technology security threats and more sophisticated and targeted computer crime pose a risk to the security of our systems and networks and the confidentiality, availability and integrity of our data and communications. While we attempt to mitigate these risks by employing a number of measures - including employee training, comprehensive monitoring of our networks and systems, and maintenance of backup and protective systems - our systems, networks and products remain potentially vulnerable to advanced persistent threats. Depending on their nature and scope, such threats could potentially lead to the compromising of confidential information and communications, improper use of our systems and networks, manipulation and destruction of data, defective products, production downtimes and operational disruptions, which in turn could adversely affect our reputation, competitiveness and results of operations.

14 CTS CORPORATION

Table Additionally, any updates to or implementation of Contentssystems, including the selection and implementation of an ERP system, may cause delays or disruptions in our processes or production which could adversely affect our results.


Item 1B.  Unresolved Staff Comments
Not applicable.
Item 2.  Properties
As of February 24, 2016,22, 2019, we had manufacturing facilities, administrative, research and development and sales offices in the following locations:
Manufacturing Facilities
Square
Footage
Owned/Leased 
Square
Footage
Owned/Leased 
Albuquerque, New Mexico102,800
Leased 114,525
Leased 
Bolingbrook, Illinois30,600
Leased 
Elkhart, Indiana319,000
Owned 319,000
Owned 
Haryana, India19,400
Leased 19,400
Leased 
Hopkinton, Massachusetts32,000
Owned 32,000
Owned 
Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic30,680
Leased 
Juarez, Mexico114,200
Leased 114,600
Leased 
Kaohsiung, Taiwan75,900
Owned(1)75,900
Owned(1)
Kvistgaard, Denmark30,680
Leased 
Lisle, Illinois31,000
Leased 
Matamoros, Mexico51,000
Owned 51,000
Owned 
Nogales, Mexico64,000
Leased 64,000
Leased 
Ostrava, Czech Republic67,600
Leased 67,600
Leased 
Prague, Czech Republic13,660
Leased 
Tianjin, China225,000
Owned(2)225,000
Owned(2)
Zhongshan, China112,600
Leased 112,600
Leased 
Total manufacturing1,183,500
  1,332,245
  

(1) Ground lease through 2026; restrictions on use and transfer apply.
(1)Ground lease through 2017; restrictions on use and transfer apply.
(2)Land Use Rights Agreement through 2050 includes transfer, lease and mortgage rights.
(2) Land Use Rights Agreement through 2050 includes transfer, lease and mortgage rights.
Non-Manufacturing Facilities
Square
Footage
Owned/LeasedDescription
Brownsville, TexasN/A
OwnedLand
Brownsville, Texas10,000
LeasedWarehouse
El Paso, Texas22,400
LeasedOffice and warehouse
Matamoros, Mexico20,000
LeasedWarehouse
Elkhart, Indiana93,000
OwnedIdle facility
Farmington Hills, Michigan1,800
LeasedSales office
Glasgow, Scotland75,00018,600
OwnedLeasedAdministrative offices and research
Lisle, Illinois37,30074,925
LeasedAdministrative offices and research
Malden, Massachusetts3,600
LeasedAdministrative offices and research
Nagoya, Japan800
LeasedSales office
Sandwich, IllinoisN/A
OwnedLand
Singapore5,600
LeasedSales office
Streetsville, Ontario, Canada112,000
OwnedIdle facility
Yokohama, Japan1,400
LeasedSales office
Total non-manufacturing352,900252,125
  
We regularly assess the adequacy of our manufacturing facilities for manufacturing capacity, available labor, and proximity to our markets and major customers. Management believes our manufacturing facilities are suitable and adequate, and have sufficient capacity to meet our current needs. The extent of utilization varies from plant to plant and with general economic conditions. We

also review the operating costs of our facilities and may from time-to-time relocate a portion of our manufacturing activities in order to reduce operating costs and improve asset utilization and cash flow.

CTS CORPORATION 15

Table of Contents

Item 3.  Legal Proceedings
From time to time we are involved in litigation with respect to matters arising from the ordinary conduct of our business, and currently certain claims are pending against us. In the opinion of management, based upon presently available information, either adequate provision for anticipated costs have been accrued or the ultimate anticipated costs will not materially affect our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
See NOTE 9Note 10 "Contingencies" in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 4.  Mine Safety Disclosures
        Not applicable.

16 CTS CORPORATION


PART II
Item 5.  Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Shareholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
CTSOur common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol "CTS." On February 19, 2016,2019, there were approximately 1,153 common962 shareholders of record.
CTS' quarterly dividend was $0.04 per share, or an annual rate of $0.16 per share, for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014. The declaration of a dividend and the amount of any such dividend is subject to earnings, anticipated working capital, capital expenditures, other investment requirements, the financial condition of CTS, and any other factors considered relevant by the Board of Directors.
Per Share Data (Unaudited)
   DividendsNet Earnings
 
High(1)
Low(1)
DeclaredBasicDiluted
2015 
 
 
 
 
4th quarter
$20.25
$16.86
$0.04
$(0.42)$(0.42)
3rd quarter
19.49
17.85
0.04
(0.15)(0.15)
2nd quarter
19.45
17.15
0.04
0.58
0.57
1st quarter
18.22
15.30
0.04
0.19
0.19
2014 
 
 




4th quarter
$19.15
$15.58
$0.04
$0.21
$0.21
3rd quarter
19.27
16.18
0.04
0.24
0.24
2nd quarter
21.65
16.29
0.04
0.19
0.19
1st quarter
21.35
17.45
0.04
0.15
0.15

(1)The market prices of CTS common stock presented reflect the highest and lowest sales prices on The New York Stock Exchange for each quarter of the last two years.
As shown in the following table, we repurchased stock totaling $9,440 during the threetwelve months ended December 31, 2015:2018:
(in thousands, except share data)
(a)
Total Number of
Shares
Purchased
(b)
Average Price
Paid per Share
(c)
Total Value
of Shares
Purchased as
Part of Plans or
Program
(d)
Maximum Value of
Shares That May Yet Be
Purchased Under the
Plans or Programs(1)
Balance at September 27, 2015 
 
 
$20,018
September 28, 2015 – October 25, 201550,000
$19.00
$950
$19,068
October 26, 2015 – November 22, 201550,000
$18.57
$929
$18,139
November 23, 2015 – December 31, 201532,500
$18.02
$585
$17,554
(in thousands, except share data)
(a)
Total Number of
Shares
Purchased
(b)
Average Price
Paid per Share
(c)
Total Value
of Shares
Purchased as
Part of Plans or
Program
(d)
Maximum Value of
Shares That May Yet Be
Purchased Under the
Plans or Programs(1)
Balance at December 31, 2017 
 
 
$17,554
January 1, 2018 - September 30, 2018
$
$
$17,554
October 1, 2018 – December 31, 2018342,100
$27.60
$9,440
$8,114
(1) In April 2015, the Board of Directors authorized a program to repurchase up to $25 million of our common stock in the open market. The authorization has no expiration.
On February 7, 2019, the Board of Directors of CTS authorized a new stock repurchase program with a maximum dollar limit of $25 million and no set expiration date. This new program replaces the program shown in the table above.

(1)In April 2015, CTS' Board of Directors authorized a program to repurchase up to $25 million of its common stock in the open market. The authorization has no expiration.

Shareholder Performance Graph
The following graph shows a five-year comparison of the cumulative total shareholder return on CTS CORPORATION 17

Tablecommon stock with the cumulative total returns of Contentsa general market index and a peer group index (S&P 500 and Dow Jones Electrical Components & Equipment Industry Group). The graph tracks the performance of a $100 investment in the Company's common stock and in each of the indexes (with the reinvestment of all dividends) on December 31, 2013.
stockvaluesfiveyearcompa001.jpg

Item 6.  Selected Financial Data
Five-Year Summary
(Amounts in thousands, except percentages and per share amounts)
2015% of Sales2014% of Sales2013% of Sales2012% of Sales2011% of Sales2018% of Sales2017% of Sales2016% of Sales2015% of Sales2014% of Sales
Summary of Operations 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net sales from continuing operations$382,310
100.0
$404,021
100.0
$409,461
100.0
$304,481
100.0
$279,857
100.0
Net sales$470,483
100.0
$422,993
100.0
$396,679
100.0
$382,310
100.0
$404,021
100.0
Cost of goods sold255,201
66.8
274,058
67.8
288,108
70.4
212,965
70.0
190,634
68.1
305,510
64.9
282,562
66.8
256,251
64.6
255,201
66.8
274,058
67.8
Gross Margin127,109
33.2
129,963
32.2
121,353
29.6
91,516
30.0
89,223
31.9
164,973
35.1
140,431
33.2
140,428
35.4
127,109
33.2
129,963
32.2
Insurance recovery from business interruption





(637)(0.2)

Selling, general and administrative expenses57,430
15.0
59,136
14.6
69,989
17.1
63,071
20.7
54,136
19.3
73,569
15.6
71,943
17.0
61,624
15.5
59,586
15.6
61,051
15.1
Research and development expenses22,461
5.9
22,563
5.6
23,222
5.7
20,918
6.9
19,990
7.2
25,304
5.4
25,146
5.9
24,040
6.1
22,461
5.9
22,563
5.6
Non-recurring environmental expense14,541
3.8














14,541
3.8


Restructuring and impairment charges14,564
3.8
5,941
1.5
10,455
2.5
3,437
1.1
2,389
0.9
5,062
1.1
4,139
1.0
3,048
0.8
14,564
3.8
5,941
1.5
Gain on sale-leaseback





(10,334)(3.4)

Operating earnings from continuing operations18,113
4.7
42,323
10.5
17,687
4.3
15,061
4.9
12,708
4.5
Other (expense) income - net(5,852)(1.5)(2,975)(0.7)376
0.1
(617)(0.2)(392)(0.1)
Earnings before income taxes from continuing operations12,261
3.2
39,348
9.8
18,063
4.4
14,444
4.7
12,316
4.4
Income tax expense from continuing operations5,307
1.4
12,826
3.2
16,066
3.9
952
0.3
1,053
0.4
Earnings from continuing operations6,954
1.8
26,522
6.6
1,997
0.5
13,492
4.4
11,263
4.0
(Loss)/earnings from discontinued operations, net of tax
 
 
(5,926) 
6,841
 
9,704
 
Net earnings (loss)$6,954
 $26,522
 
$(3,929) 
$20,333
 
$20,967
 
Loss (gain) on sale of assets

708
(2.9)(11,450)(2.9)(2,156)(0.6)(1,915)(0.5)
Operating earnings61,038
13.0
38,495
9.1
63,166
15.9
18,113
4.7
42,323
10.5
Other (expense) income(2,935)(0.6)1,758
0.4
(5,921)(1.5)(5,852)(1.5)(2,975)(0.7)
Earnings before income taxes58,103
12.3
40,253
9.5
57,245
14.4
12,261
3.2
39,348
9.8
Income tax expense11,571
2.5
25,805
6.1
22,865
5.8
5,307
1.4
12,826
3.2
Net earnings$46,532
9.9
$14,448
3.4
$34,380
8.7
$6,954
1.8
$26,522
6.6
Retained earnings - beginning of year$380,145
 
358,997
 
367,800
 
352,205
 
335,524
 
420,160
 
410,979
 
381,840
 
380,145
 
358,997
 
Dividends declared(5,259) 
(5,374) 
(4,874) 
(4,738) 
(4,286) 
(5,278) 
(5,267) 
(5,241) 
(5,259) 
(5,374) 
Implementation of new accounting standard17,433
 $
 $
 $
 $
 
Retained earnings - end of year$381,840
 
$380,145
 
$358,997
 
$367,800
 
$352,205
 
$478,847
 
$420,160
 
$410,979
 
$381,840
 
$380,145
 
Net earnings (loss) per share: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Continuing operations$0.21
 
$0.79
 
$0.06
 
$0.40
 
$0.33
 
Discontinued operations
 

 
(0.18) 
0.20
 
0.28
 
Total$0.21
 
$0.79
 
$(0.12) 
$0.60
 
$0.61
 
Diluted: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Continuing operations$0.21
 
$0.78
 
$0.06
 
$0.39
 
$0.32
 
Discontinued operations
 

 
(0.18) 
0.20
 
0.28
 
Total$0.21
 
$0.78
 
$(0.12) 
$0.59
 
$0.60
 
          
Net earnings per share: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic$1.41
 
$0.44
 
$1.05
 
$0.21
 
$0.79
 
Diluted$1.39
 
$0.43
 
$1.03
 
$0.21
 
$0.78
 
          
Average basic shares outstanding (000s)32,959
 
33,618
 
33,601
 
33,922
 
34,321
 
33,024
 
32,892
 
32,728
 
32,959
 
33,618
 
Average diluted shares outstanding (000s)33,484
 
34,130
 
34,249
 
34,523
 
35,006
 
33,569
 
33,420
 
33,251
 
33,484
 
34,130
 
Cash dividends per share (annualized)$0.160
 
$0.160
 
$0.145
 
$0.140
 
$0.125
 
$0.160
 
$0.160
 
$0.160
 
$0.160
 
$0.160
 
Capital expenditures (1)
$9,723
 
$12,949
 
$13,982
 
$16,323
 
$20,307
 
Capital expenditures$28,488
 
$18,094
 
$20,500
 
$9,723
 
$12,949
 
Depreciation and amortization$16,254
 
$16,971
 
$21,169
 
$19,615
 
$17,548
 
$22,514
 
$20,674
 
$18,992
 
$16,254
 
$16,971
 
          
Financial Position at Year End 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Current assets$251,979
 
$240,401
 
$236,269
 
$309,558
 
$283,386
 
$239,359
 
$233,609
 
$215,707
 
$245,954
 
$240,401
 
Current liabilities101,351
 
79,982
 
95,120
 
115,040
 
124,237
 
103,993
 
102,412
 
98,129
 
94,620
 
79,982
 
Current ratio2.5 to 1
 
3.0 to 1
 
2.5 to 1
 
2.7 to 1
 
2.3 to 1
 
2.3 to 1
 
2.3 to 1
 
2.2 to 1
 
2.5 to 1
 
3.0 to 1
 
Working capital150,628
 
160,419
 
141,149
 
194,518
 
159,149
 
135,366
 
131,197
 
117,578
 
151,334
 
160,419
 
Inventories24,600
 
27,887
 
32,226
 
81,752
 
92,540
 
43,486
 
36,596
 
28,652
 
24,600
 
27,887
 
Net property, plant and equipment69,872
 
71,414
 
74,869
 
93,725
 
84,860
 
99,401
 
88,247
 
82,111
 
69,872
 
71,414
 
Total assets484,133
 
456,926
 
480,265
 
561,190
 
480,815
 
548,341
 
539,696
 
517,697
 
483,373
 
456,926
 
Long-term debt90,700
 
75,000
 
75,000
 
153,500
 
74,400
 
50,000
 
76,300
 
89,100
 
90,700
 
75,000
 
Long-term obligations, including long-term debt101,128
 
87,155
 
88,416
 
178,392
 
93,281
 
66,419
 
93,479
 
101,686
 
107,099
 
87,155
 
Shareholders' equity281,654
 
289,789
 
296,729
 
267,758
 
263,297
 
377,929
 
343,805
 
317,882
 
281,654
 
289,789
 
Common shares outstanding (000s)32,548
 
33,392
 
33,559
 
33,433
 
34,066
 
32,751
 
32,938
 
32,762
 
32,548
 
33,392
 
Equity (book value) per share$8.65
 
$8.68
 
$8.84
 
$8.01
 
$7.73
 
$11.54
 
$10.44
 
$9.70
 
$8.65
 
$8.68
 
Stock price range20.25-15.30
 
21.65-15.58
 
20.10-9.33
 
11.22-7.06
 
12.39-7.14
 
24.07-39.20
 
19.30-28.35
 
12.87-24.80
 
15.30-20.25
 
15.58-21.65
 


(1)Includes capital expenditures to replace property, plant and equipment damaged in casualties of $2,859 and $4,733 in 2012 and 2011

Certain acquisitions, divestitures, closures of operations or product lines, and certain accounting reclassifications affect the comparability of information contained in the "Five-Year Summary."

18 CTS CORPORATION


Item 7.  Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Overview
CTS Corporation ("CTS", "we", "our", or "us" or the "Company") is a globalleading designer and manufacturer of electronic componentsproducts that Sense, Connect and sensors used primarily in the transportation, communications, defense and aerospace, medical, industrial, and information technology markets.
CTS'Move. Our vision is to be a leading provider of sensing and motion devices as well as connectivity components, enabling an intelligent and seamless world. CTS provides components and modules for electronic systems thatThese devices are organized under the categories ofcategorized by their ability to Sense, Connect or Move. Our Sense products provide vital inputs to electronic systems. Our Connect products allow systems to function in syncsynchronization with other systems. Our Move products ensure required movements are effectively and accurately executed. CTS isWe are committed to achieving our vision by continuing to invest in the development and supply of products and technologies that Sense, Connect,within these categories.
We manufacture sensors, actuators, and Moveelectronic components in North America, Europe, and Asia. CTS provides engineered products to fulfill its vision.OEMs in the aerospace and defense, industrial, information technology, medical, telecommunications, and transportation markets.
There is an increasing proliferation of sensing and motion products inapplications within various markets served by CTS, including automotive, industrial and other applications.we serve. In addition, the increasing connectivity of various devices to the internet results in greater demand for communication bandwidth usage, and data storage, requirements create opportunitiesincreasing the need for CTS and itsour connectivity product portfolio. The Company'sproducts. Our success is dependent on itsthe ability to execute this strategy. CTS isour strategy to support these trends. We are subject to challenges including periodic market softness, competition from other suppliers, changes in technology, and the ability to add new customers, launch new products or penetrate new markets.
Results of Operations: Fourth Quarter 20152018 versus Fourth Quarter 20142017
(Amounts in thousands, except percentages and per share amounts):
The following table highlights changes in significant components of the Consolidated Statements of Earnings (Loss) for the quarters ended December 31, 20152018, and December 31, 2014:2017:
Three Months Ended Three Months Ended December 31, Percent of Net Sales
December 31,
2015
December 31,
2014
Percent
Change
Percent of
Net Sales –
2015
Percent of
Net Sales –
2014
20182017
Percent
Change
20182017
Net sales$93,282
$100,378
(7.1)100.0
100.0
$120,073
$110,910
8.3
100.0
100.0
Cost of goods sold (1)
63,128
67,352
(6.3)67.7
67.1
77,428
78,035
(0.8)64.5
70.4
Gross margin30,154
33,026
(8.7)32.3
32.9
42,645
32,875
29.7
35.5
29.6
Selling, general and administrative expenses13,805
15,783
(12.5)14.8
15.7
18,128
24,973
(27.4)15.1
22.5
Research and development expenses6,083
5,798
4.9
6.5
5.8
5,804
6,714
(13.6)4.8
6.1
Restructuring and impairment charges9,335
1,135
722.5
10.0
1.1
1,698
1,197
41.9
1.4
1.1
(Gain) loss on sale of assets(2)10
(120.0)

Total operating expenses29,223
22,716
28.6
31.3
22.6
25,628
32,894
(22.1)21.3
29.7
Operating earnings931
10,310
(91.0)1.0
10.3
Other (expense) income(1,610)(1,553)3.7
(1.7)(1.6)
(Loss) earnings before income tax(679)8,757
(107.8)(0.7)8.7
Income tax expense12,974
1,793
623.6
13.9
1.8
Net (loss) earnings$(13,653)$6,964
(296.1)(14.6)6.9
Operating earnings (loss)17,017
(19)89,663.2
14.2

Other (expense) income, net(144)164
(187.8)(0.1)0.1
Earnings before income tax16,873
145
11,536.6
14.1
0.1
Income tax (benefit) expense(691)13,766
(105.0)(0.6)12.4
Net earnings (loss)$17,564
$(13,621)228.9
14.6
(12.3)
Diluted earnings per share: 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
Diluted net (loss) earnings per share$(0.42)$0.21
 
 
 
Diluted net earnings (loss) per share$0.52
$(0.41) 
 
 
(1)Cost of goods sold includes restructuring-related charges of $187 in 2015 and $531 in 2014.
Sales of $93,282$120,073 in the fourth quarter of 2015 decreased $7,0962018 increased $9,163 or 7.1%8.3% from the fourth quarter of 2014.2017. Sales to automotivetransportation markets increased $5,163 or 7.2%. Sales to other end markets increased $4,000 or 10.2%. Changes in foreign exchange rates decreased $3,933 partlysales by $880 year-over-year due to lower volumesthe U.S. Dollar appreciating compared to the Chinese Renminbi and Euro.
In the fourth quarter of older automotive products2017, we recorded a $13,415 one-time, non-cash pension settlement charge. During 2017, CTS offered its pension participants the opportunity to receive a lump sum payment to settle their future pension benefits. A number of participants elected the lump sum option, and partly duethe total lump sum payments distributed to foreign currency impact of approximately $1,600. Other sales were $3,163 lowerthese participants when the offer window closed in the fourth quarter was large enough to trigger a pension settlement charge under U.S. GAAP. This charge was recorded in the amount of 2015 driven by weak demand in communications$4,796 to cost of goods sold, $6,557 to selling, general and HDD markets.administrative expenses and $2,062 to research and development expenses.
Gross margin as a percent of sales was 32.3%35.5% in the fourth quarter of 20152018 compared to 32.9%29.6% in the fourth quarter of 2014.2017. The decreasepension settlement charge recorded in the fourth quarter of 2017 impacted gross margin unfavorably by $4,796 or 4.3%. The

increase in gross margin was largelyprimarily driven by savings related to lower volumes.product line transfers associated with the June 2016 Restructuring Plan described in Note 8.
Selling, general and administrative expenses were $13,805$18,128 or 14.8%15.1% of sales in the fourth quarter of 20152018 versus $15,783$24,973 or 15.7%22.5% of sales in the comparable quarter of 2014.2017. The decrease was primarily due to continued efficiency gains from restructuring projects, cost containment efforts,pension settlement charge recorded in the fourth quarter of 2017 impacted selling, general and timing of certain expenses.administrative expenses unfavorably by $6,557 or 5.9%.

CTS CORPORATION 19

Table of Contents

Research and development expenses were $6,083$5,804 or 6.5%4.8% of sales in the fourth quarter of 20152018 compared to $5,798$6,714, or 5.8%6.1% of sales, in the comparable quarter of 2014.2017. The increase was related to continued investmentpension settlement charge recorded in new products to drive organic growth.the fourth quarter of 2017 impacted research and development expenses unfavorably by $2,062, or 1.9%. Research and development expenses are focused on expanded applications of existing products, and new product development, as well asand enhancements for current productproducts and process enhancements.processes.
Restructuring and impairment charges were $1,698 in the fourth quarter of 2015 totaled $9,3352018. These charges were mainly for building and consisted of a non-cash charge for unamortized lossesequipment relocation, severance, and travel costs related to the winduprestructuring of CTS’ U.K. pension plan incertain operations as part of the amountJune 2016 Restructuring Plan. In the fourth quarter 2017, restructuring and impairment charges consisting of $8,280severance and other costs incurredtotaled $1,197, which were also in connection with CTS' previously announced 2013 and 2014 restructuring plans. The fourth quarter 2014 restructuring charges totaled $1,135 and consisted primarily of accruals related to the consolidation of CTS’ Canadian operation in Streetsville, Ontario into other CTS facilities and costs in other locations related to the 2013 and 2014 restructuring plans.our June 2016 Restructuring Plan.
Operating earnings were $931$17,017, or 1.0%14.2% of sales in the fourth quarter of 20152018, compared to $10,310an operating loss of $19, or 10.3%0.0% of sales, in the comparable quarter of 20142017 as a result of the items discussed above.
Other (expense) income and expense items are summarized in the following table:
Three Months EndedThree Months Ended December 31,
December 31,
2015
December 31,
2014
20182017
Interest expense$(673)$(563)$(484)$(1,134)
Interest income719
827
459
370
Other (expense) income, net(1,656)(1,817)
Total other (expense) income$(1,610)$(1,553)
Other (expense) income(119)928
Total other (expense) income, net$(144)$164
Interest expense increased slightlydecreased in the fourth quarter of 20152018 versus 2014 as a result of higher borrowings2017 due to lower debt balances and a slightlyreduction in interest related to interest rate swaps. Interest income increased due to higher interest rate. Interestrates. Other income declined slightly due to the impact of lower interest rates on higher cash balances in China. Other expense in the fourth quarter of 2015 and 20142017 was driven mainly by foreign currency translation losses asgains due to the U.S. Dollar appreciated duringappreciation of the quarterChinese Renminbi compared to the Chinese Renminbi.U.S. Dollar.
 Three Months Ended
 
December 31,
2015
December 31,
2014
Effective tax rate(1,910.8)%20.5%
 Three Months Ended December 31,
 20182017
Effective tax rate(4.1)%9,493.8%

The effective income tax rate for the fourth quarter of 20152018 was (1,910.8%), which includes the impact of restructuring charges and one-time items. In the fourth quarter of 2015, CTS determined that as a result of changes in the business, the foreign earnings of its Canadian and U.K. subsidiaries were no longer permanently reinvested. Therefore, a provision for the expected taxes on repatriation of those earnings was recorded. In addition, although CTS plans(4.1)% compared to permanently reinvest the earnings of its Chinese operations outside the U.S., CTS has determined that it will not maintain those earnings in China in order to mitigate future currency risk. As a result of these changes, CTS recorded a tax expense of $7,461. CTS recorded additional discrete tax items related to valuation allowances, foreign earnings, and other discrete items9,493.8% in the fourth quarter of 2015, which increased income2017. The tax expenserate in 2018 was impacted primarily by $4,912. Sincea discrete one-time rate change benefit related to the shutdownTax Cuts and Jobs Act (“Tax Act”) resulting from the election of manufacturing facilities in the U.K. and Canada, CTS does not anticipate generating future profits in these countries. Therefore, the change in permanent reinvestment assertion for these two countries is not expected to have an ongoing impact on the Company's effective tax rate. CTS will continue to record tax expense for withholding taxes (currently 10%) on earnings in China that are not anticipated to be maintained in China. This expense will increase the Company's ongoing effective tax rate.accounting method changes. The effective income tax rate for the fourth quarter of 2014 was 20.5%, which included the impact of restructuring charges and one-time items. Tax adjustments related to restructuring decreased the rate by 1.3% in the fourth quarter of 2014. Discrete2017 was primarily related to the initial application of the Tax Act including the remeasurement of the net deferred tax items reducedassets from 35% to 21% and the rate by 8.4%. The 2014 effective rate reflectedone-time mandatory transition tax on the historical earnings of foreign affiliates, which resulted in a change in the mixnet non-cash charge of earnings by jurisdiction.$18,001.

The net lossNet earnings was $13,653$17,564, or $0.42$0.52 per diluted share, in the fourth quarter of 20152018, compared to a net earningsloss of $6,964$13,621, or $0.21$0.41 per diluted share, in the comparable quarter of 2014.2017.



20 CTS CORPORATION



Table of Contents





Results of Operations: Year Ended December 31, 20152018, versus Year Ended December 31, 20142017
(Amounts in thousands, except percentages and per share amounts):
The following table highlights changes in significant components of the Consolidated Statements of Earnings (Loss) for the years Endedended December 31, 20152018, and December 31, 2014:2017:
Year Ended Years Ended December 31, Percent of Net Sales
December 31,
2015
December 31,
2014
Percent
Change
Percent of
Net Sales –
2015
Percent of
Net Sales –
2014
20182017
Percent
Change
20182017
Net sales$382,310
$404,021
(5.4)100.0
100.0
$470,483
$422,993
11.2
100.0
100.0
Cost of goods sold (1)255,201
274,058
(6.9)66.8
67.8
305,510
282,562
8.1
64.9
66.8
Gross margin127,109
129,963
(2.2)33.2
32.2
164,973
140,431
17.5
35.1
33.2
Selling, general and administrative expenses57,430
59,136
(2.9)15.0
14.6
73,569
71,943
2.3
15.6
17.0
Research and development expenses22,461
22,563
(0.5)5.9
5.6
25,304
25,146
0.6
5.4
5.9
Non-recurring environmental expense14,541

N/M
3.8

Restructuring and impairment charges14,564
5,941
145.1
3.8
1.5
5,062
4,139
22.3
1.1
1.0
Loss on sale of assets
708
(100.0)
0.2
Total operating expenses108,996
87,640
24.4
28.5
21.7
103,935
101,936
2.0
22.1
24.1
Operating earnings18,113
42,323
(57.2)4.7
10.5
61,038
38,495
58.6
13.0
9.1
Other (expense) income(5,852)(2,975)96.7
(1.5)(0.7)
Other (expense) income, net(2,935)1,758
(267.0)(0.6)0.4
Earnings before income tax12,261
39,348
(68.8)3.2
9.8
58,103
40,253
44.3
12.4
9.5
Income tax expense5,307
12,826
(58.6)1.4
3.2
11,571
25,805
(55.2)2.5
6.1
Net earnings6,954
26,522
(73.8)1.8
6.6
46,532
14,448
222.1
9.9
3.4
Diluted earnings per share: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Diluted net earnings per share$0.21
$0.78
 
 
 
$1.39
$0.43
 
 
 
(1)Cost of goods sold includes restructuring related charges of $631 in 2015 and $1,935 in 2014.
N/M = not meaningful
Sales of $382,310were $470,483 for the year ended December 31, 2015 decreased $21,7112018, an increase of $47,490, or 5.4%11.2% from 2014.2017. Sales to automotivetransportation markets declined $14,941 partlyincreased $24,873 or 9.0%. Sales to other end markets increased $22,617 or 15.3%. The Noliac acquisition added $9,463 in sales in 2018 and $7,084 in sales in 2017. Changes in foreign exchange rates increased sales by $3,238 year-over-year due to lower volumes of older automotive productsthe U.S. Dollar depreciating compared to the Chinese Renminbi and partly due to an unfavorable currency impact of approximately $7,800. Other sales were down $6,770 driven by weak demand in communications and HDD markets.Euro.
Gross margin as a percent of sales was 35.1% in 2018 versus 33.2% in 2015 versus 32.2%2017. The pension settlement charge recorded in 2014.the fourth quarter of 2017 impacted gross margin unfavorably by $4,796, or 1.1% of sales. The increase in gross margin resulted from costwas primarily driven by savings from continued efficiency gains, materialrelated to product line transfers and labor productivity projects, and savings from restructuring projects. CTS realized a substantial portion of anticipated savings from the shift of production from Canada to lower cost locations. In addition, foreign exchange rates had a favorable impact on manufacturing costs as the U.S. Dollar appreciated against various local currencies in countries inof foreign exchange rate movements which CTS has manufacturing operations.were partially offset by material cost increases.
Selling, general and administrative expenses were $57,430$73,569, or 15.0%15.6% of sales for the year ended December 31, 20152018, versus $59,136$71,943 or 14.6%17.0% of sales in the comparable period of 2014.2017. The decrease was attributable to restructuring actions, cost containment efforts,pension settlement charge recorded in the fourth quarter of 2017 impacted selling, general and administrative expenses unfavorably by $6,557 or 1.6% of sales. The increase includes higher stock-based compensation and ERP implementation costs as well as incremental costs resulting from the timingNoliac acquisition in 2017, including amortization of certain expenses.intangibles.
Research and development expenses were $22,461$25,304 or 5.4% of sales in 2018 compared to $25,146 or 5.9% of sales in 2015 compared to $22,5632017. The pension settlement charge recorded in the fourth quarter of 2017 impacted research and development expenses unfavorably by $2,062, or 5.6%0.5% of sales in 2014. The decrease was driven by a re-prioritization of spending on specific projects and timing of projects.sales. Research and development expenses are primarily focused on expanded applications of existing products, and new product development, as well asand enhancements for current productproducts and process enhancements.
A non-recurring environmental charge of $14,541 was recorded in the third quarter of 2015 related to a site in Asheville, North Carolina. The charge recorded included both the interim remediation costs proposed by CTS and accepted by the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) and anticipated future remediation costs and monitoring for a final site-wide remediation.processes.
Restructuring and impairment charges were $5,062 for the year ended December 31, 2015 totaled $14,5642018. The charges were mainly for building and consisted largely of a non-cash charge for unamortized losses related to the windup of CTS’ U.K. pension plan in the amount of $8,280 as well asequipment relocation, severance, and other costs incurred in connection with the 2013 and 2014 restructuring plans. Restructuring

CTS CORPORATION 21

Table of Contents

charges for the year ended December 31, 2014 totaled $5,941 and consisted primarily of severancetravel costs related to the consolidationrestructuring of CTS’ Canadian operation into other CTS facilities, lease impairment costcertain operations as part of the 2016 Restructuring Plan. Restructuring charges were $4,139 in the U.K., asset impairment costs related to2017.
The loss on sale of assets in 2017 was driven by a loss on the sale of the Carol Streamvacant land at our Hopkinton, Massachusetts facility and costs in other locations related to the 2013 and 2014 restructuring plans.September 2017.
Operating earnings were $18,113$61,038, or 4.7%13.0% of sales in 20152018, compared to $42,323$38,495, or 10.5%9.1% of sales in 20142017 as a result of the items discussed above.

Other income and expense items are summarized in the following table:
Year EndedYears Ended December 31,
December 31,
2015
December 31,
2014
20182017
Interest expense$(2,628)$(2,326)$(2,085)$(3,343)
Interest income3,073
2,786
1,826
1,284
Other (expense) income, net(6,297)(3,435)
Total other expense$(5,852)$(2,975)
Other (expense) income(2,676)3,817
Total other (expense) income, net$(2,935)$1,758
Interest expense increaseddecreased in the year ended December 31, 20152018, versus the comparablesame period in 2014 as2017 primarily due to lower debt balances, a result of higher borrowingsreduction in 2015. The higher borrowings were primarilyinterest related to fund share buybacksinterest rate swaps, and a one-time charge related to a liability that was settled in 2015.2017. Interest income increased primarily due to higher cash balances.interest rates. Other expense in the yearsyear ended December 31, 2015 and December 31, 20142018, was primarilydriven by foreign currency translation losses mainly due to the unfavorable foreign exchange impact related to the appreciation of the U.S. Dollar compared to the Chinese Renminbi and the Euro. Other income in the year ended December 31, 2017 was driven mainly by foreign currency translation gains due to the depreciation of the U.S. Dollar compared to the Chinese Renminbi and the Euro.
 Year Ended
 
December 31,
2015
December 31,
2014
Effective tax rate43.3%32.6%
 Years Ended December 31,
 20182017
Effective tax rate19.9%64.1%
The effective income tax rate in 20152018 was 43.3%, which included the impact of restructuring charges and one-time items. In 2015, CTS determined that as a result of changes19.9% compared to 64.1% in the business,prior year. The tax rate in 2018 was favorably impacted by a discrete one-time rate change benefit related to the foreign earningsTax Act resulting from the election of its Canadian and U.K. subsidiaries were no longer permanently reinvested. Therefore,tax accounting method changes, partially offset by a provision for the expected taxesone-time withholding tax on repatriation of those earnings from one of our foreign subsidiaries that was recorded. In addition, although CTS planscompleted during the year to permanently reinvestenable the earningsuse of its Chinese operations outside the U.S., CTS has determined that it will not maintain those earningstax credits due to expire in China in order to mitigate future currency risk. As a result of these changes, CTS recorded a tax expense of $7,461. CTS recorded a benefit of $16,305 related to the change in the treatment of foreign taxes for U.S. federal income tax purposes. CTS recorded additional discrete tax items in 2015 which increased income tax expense by $10,157 related to uncertain tax positions on certain foreign taxes, valuation allowances, foreign earnings, and other discrete items.2018. The effective tax rate in 20142017 was 32.6%,unfavorably impacted by the application of the Tax Act, driven by the remeasurement of the net deferred tax assets from 35% to 21% and the one-time mandatory transition tax on the historical earnings of foreign affiliates, which included the impactresulted in a net non-cash charge of restructuring charges and one-time items. Tax adjustments related to restructuring increased the rate by 2.9% in 2014. Discrete tax items reduced the rate by 1.6%. The 2014 effective rate reflected higher profits, primarily from a change in the mix of earnings by jurisdiction.$18,001.
Net earnings were $6,954$46,532 or $0.21$1.39 per diluted share for the year ended December 31, 20152018, compared to earnings of $26,522$14,448 or $0.78$0.43 per diluted share in the comparable period of 2014.2017.

22 CTS CORPORATION


Results of Operations: YearYears Ended December 31, 20142017, versus Year Ended December 31, 20132016
(Amounts in thousands, except percentages and per share amounts):
The following table highlights changes in significant components of the Consolidated Statements of Earnings (Loss) for the Year Endedyears ended December 31, 20142017, and December 31, 2013:2016:
Year Ended Years Ended December 31, Percent of Net Sales
December 31,
2014
December 31,
2013
Percent
Change
Percent of
Net Sales –
2014
Percent of
Net Sales –
2013
20172016Percent
Change
20172016
Net sales$404,021
$409,461
(1.3)100.0
100.0
$422,993
$396,679
6.6
100.0100.0
Cost of goods sold (1)274,058
288,108
(4.9)67.8
70.4
282,562
256,251
10.3
66.864.6
Gross margin129,963
121,353
7.1
32.2
29.6
140,431
140,428

33.235.4
Selling, general and administrative expenses59,136
69,989
(15.5)14.6
17.1
71,943
61,624
16.7
17.015.5
Research and development expenses22,563
23,222
(2.8)5.6
5.7
25,146
24,040
4.6
5.96.1
Restructuring and impairment charges5,941
10,455
(43.2)1.5
2.5
4,139
3,048
35.8
1.00.8
Loss (gain) on sale of assets708
(11,450)(106.2)0.2(2.9)
Total operating expenses87,640
103,666
(15.5)21.7
25.3
101,936
77,262
31.9
24.119.5
Operating earnings42,323
17,687
139.3
10.5
4.3
38,495
63,166
(39.1)9.115.9
Other (expense) income(2,975)376
N/M
(0.7)0.1
Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes39,348
18,063
117.8
9.8
4.4
Other income (expense), net1,758
(5,921)(129.7)0.4(1.5)
Earnings before income tax40,253
57,245
(29.7)9.514.4
Income tax expense12,826
16,066
(20.2)3.2
3.9
25,805
22,865
12.9
6.15.8
Earnings from continuing operations26,522
1,997
N/M
6.6
0.5
Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes
(5,926)N/M

(1.5)
Net earnings (loss)$26,522
$(3,929)N/M
6.6
(1.0)
Net earnings14,448
34,380
(58.0)3.48.7
Diluted earnings per share: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations$0.78
$0.06
 
 
 
Diluted loss per share from discontinued operations$
$(0.18) 
 
 
Diluted net earnings (loss) per share$0.78
$(0.12) 
 
 
Diluted net earnings per share$0.43
$1.03
 
  
(1)Cost of goods sold includes restructuring related charges of $1,935 in 2014 and $1,317 in 2013.
N/M = not meaningful
Sales of $404,021were $422,993 for the year ended December 31, 2014 decreased $5,4402017, an increase of $26,314, or 1.3%6.6% from 2013.2016. Sales to automotivetransportation markets increased $2,783.$12,586 or 4.8%. Other sales were $8,223 lower driven by lower shipments of electronic components, mainly frequency, filter and HDD products, which were partially offset by higher shipments of piezo products. Salesincreased $13,728 or 10.2%. The Noliac acquisition added $7,084 in 2013 included a special order of $5,491 to an automotive customer. Excluding this special order, sales in 2014 were approximately equal to sales in 2013.2017.
Gross margin as a percent of sales was 32.2%33.2% in 20142017 versus 29.6%35.4% in 2013.2016. The increasepension settlement charge recorded in the fourth quarter of 2017 impacted gross margin unfavorably by $4,796, or 1.1% of sales. The remaining decrease in gross margin resulted from cost savings from restructuring actions, productivity improvements, product mixcosts relating to certain production rework issues that were resolved in 2017 and favorablean unfavorable impact of foreign exchange impact.rate movements.
Selling, general and administrative expenses were $59,136$71,943, or 14.6%17.0% of sales for the year ended December 31, 20142017, versus $69,989$61,624 or 17.1%15.5% of sales in the comparable period of 2013.2016. The decrease ispension settlement charge recorded in the fourth quarter of 2017 impacted selling, general and administrative expenses unfavorably by $6,557 or 1.6% of sales. The remaining increase was primarily attributable to restructuring actions, cost containment efforts in 2014, costs for CTS’ CEO transition of $4,138 in 2013, and lower pension expense in 2014 compared to 2013. These reductions were partially offset by an increase in sellingstock-based compensation as well as incremental costs resulting from the Noliac acquisition in 2017 and marketing expenses to drive growth initiatives.the single crystal acquisition in 2016, including amortization of intangibles.
Research and development expenses were $22,563$25,146 or 5.6%5.9% of sales in 20142017 compared to $23,222$24,040 or 5.7%6.1% of sales in 2013.2016. The pension settlement charge recorded in the fourth quarter of 2017 impacted research and development expenses unfavorably by $2,062, or 0.5% of sales. The remaining decrease was driven byis related to higher non-recurring engineering fundingreimbursements from customers for research and development costs in 2017 and timing of projects, cost reductions related to restructuring actions, and a repositioning of CTS’ spending on various projects.certain expenses. Research and development expenses are primarily focused on expanded applications of existing products, and new product development, as well asand enhancements for current productproducts and process enhancements.processes.

CTS CORPORATION 23

Table of Contents

Restructuring and impairment charges declined in thewere $4,139 for year ended December 31, 2014 versus 2013. Charges2017. The charges were mainly for the year ended December 31, 2014 totaled $5,941building and consist primarily ofequipment relocation, severance and travel costs related to the consolidationrestructuring of CTS’ Canadian operationcertain operations as part of the 2016 Restructuring Plan. Restructuring charges were $3,048 in Streetsville, Ontario into other CTS facilities, severance costs2016.
The loss on sale of assets in China, Mexico and the U.K. and at CTS’ corporate office, lease impairment costs in the U.K. as well as asset impairment costs related to2017 was driven by a loss on the sale of vacant land at our Hopkinton, Massachusetts facility in September 2017. The 2016 gain on sale of assets of $11,450 is driven principally by a gain on the Carol Stream facility. Restructuring charges for the year ended December 31, 2013 totaled $10,455 and consist primarilysale of severance, asset impairments, legal and administrative costs related to the June 2013 Restructuring Plan (“June 2013 Plan”). The June 2013 Restructuring Plan consolidated our U.K.former manufacturing facility into the Czech Republic facility, consolidated our Carol Stream, Illinois manufacturing facility into the Juarez, Mexico facility, discontinued manufacturing at our Singapore facility and restructured our corporate office.in Canada in June 2016.
Operating earnings were $42,323$38,495, or 10.5%9.1% of sales in 20142017, compared to $17,687$63,166, or 4.3%15.9% of sales in 20132016 as a result of the items discussed above.
Other income and expense items are summarized in the following table:

Year EndedYears Ended December 31,
December 31,
2014
December 31,
2013
20172016
Interest expense$(2,326)$(3,264)$(3,343)$(3,702)
Interest income2,786
1,901
1,284
1,305
Other income, net(3,435)1,739
Total other income (expense)$(2,975)$376
Other expense (income)3,817
(3,524)
Total other expense (income), net$1,758
$(5,921)

Interest expense decreased in the year ended December 31, 20142017, versus the comparablesame period in 20132016 primarily as a result of lower borrowings enabled by the proceeds from the EMS divestiturea reduction in interest related to interest rate swaps. Interest income was down slightly in 2017 versus 2016. Other income in the fourth quarter of 2013. Interest income increased primarilyyear ended December 31, 2017, was driven mainly by foreign currency translation gains due to higher cash balances.the depreciation of the U.S. Dollar compared to the Chinese Renminbi and the Euro. Other expense in the year ended December 31, 2014 is primarily2016, was driven by foreign currency translation losses, mainly due to the unfavorable foreign exchange impact related to the appreciation of the U.S. Dollar compared to the Chinese Renminbi and the Euro. In 2013, the U.S. Dollar depreciated compared to these currencies, driving a considerable foreign exchange gain.

 Year Ended
 
December 31,
2014
December 31,
2013
Effective tax rate32.6%89.0%
 Years Ended December 31,
 20172016
Effective tax rate64.1%39.9%


The effective income tax rate in 20142017 was 32.6%64.1%, which includeswas primarily due to a provisional one-time tax expense of $18,001 resulting from the impactTax Cuts and Jobs Act, which was enacted on December 22, 2017. The rate also reflects a decrease in the valuation allowance on certain non-U.S. losses as a result of restructuring chargeschanges in the expectation of our ability to utilize those losses and one-time items. Tax adjustments related to restructuring increased the rate by 2.9% in 2014. Discrete tax items reduced the rate by 1.6%. The 2014 effective rate reflects higher profits, primarily from a changechanges in the mix of earnings by jurisdiction. The 2013 effective income tax rate in 2016 was 89.0%39.9%, which includes restructuring charges, one-time items, an increase in valuation allowances recorded against certain state net operating losses and reflects $10,800tax credits, and the revaluation of tax expense related to a $30,000 cash repatriation from Singapore to the U.S. deferred taxes as a result of the SingaporeJune 2016 restructuring activities discussed in Note 8, "Costs Associated with Exit and Restructuring Activities". The rate also reflects an increase in the valuation allowance on certain non-U.S. losses as a result of changes in the expectation of our ability to utilize those losses, changes in the mix of earnings by jurisdiction, our decision to no longer permanently reinvest the earnings of our Canadian and U.K. subsidiaries, tax expense of $1,000 for the write-off of deferred tax assetswithholding taxes on earnings in the U.K. relatedChina that are not anticipated to the June 2013 Restructuring Plan. A $1,632be maintained in China, and various other discrete tax benefit is also included in 2013 associated with the retroactive application of the U.S. research tax credit signed into law during January 2013 and granting of the China high technology incentive tax credit in the first quarter of 2013. In 2014, CTS recognized a $594 tax benefit in its 2014 tax provision due to U.S. tax extender legislation.items.
Net earnings from continuing operations were $26,522$14,448 or $0.78$0.43 per diluted share for the year ended December 31, 20142017, compared to earnings from continuing operations of $1,997$34,380 or $0.06$1.03 per diluted share in the comparable period of 2013.2016.
The loss from discontinued operations in 2013 represents the results from the CTS EMS business, which was divested in the fourth quarter of 2013.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
(Amounts in thousands, except percentages and per share amounts):
Cash and cash equivalents were $156,928$100,933 at December 31, 20152018, and $134,508$113,572 at December 31, 2014,2017, of which $156,310$96,762 and $131,152,$112,531, respectively, were held outside the United States. The increasedecrease in cash and cash equivalents of $12,639 was driven principally by cash generated from operationsoperating activities of $58,152, which exceeded the cash used for investingwas offset by capital expenditures of $28,488, net debt payments of $26,300, purchase of treasury stock of $9,440, and financing activities.

24 CTS CORPORATION

Tabledividends paid of Contents

5,285. Total debt as of December 31, 20152018, and December 31, 20142017, was $90,700$50,000 and $75,000,$76,300, respectively. Total debt as a percentage of total capitalization, defined as the sum of notes payable and long-term debt as a percentage of total debt and shareholders’ equity, was 24.4%11.7% at December 31, 20152018, compared to 20.6%18.2% at December 31, 2014.2017.
Working capital decreasedincreased by $9,791$4,169 from December 31, 20142017, to December 31, 2015,2018, primarily due to a $22,420 increaseincreases in cashaccounts receivable and cash equivalents and a $28,549 increaseinventory, which were partially offset by the decrease in accrued liabilities.cash.
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities was $38,624$58,152 during the year ended December 31, 2015.2018. Components of net cash provided by operating activities included net earnings of $6,954;$46,532, depreciation and amortization expense of $16,254;$22,514, stock-based compensation of $5,256, and other net non-cash items totaling $340, which were offset by net changes totaling $24,399 for non-cash items such as equity-based compensation, restructuring-related charges, amortizationin assets and liabilities of retirement benefits, non-recurring environmental expense,$15,482 and deferred income taxes and gain on sale of assets; and a net cash use due to changes in current assets and current liabilities of $8,983. The net changes in current assets and liabilities were due to a net decrease in various accrued and other liabilities which were partially offset by a decrease in accounts receivable, inventory and other current assets.1,008.
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 20152018, was $9,130 which consisted of $9,723 of$28,485, driven by the net capital expenditures $1,878 in proceeds from the sale of fixed assets and $1,285 paid for the acquisition of Filter Sensing Technologies, net of cash acquired and a working capital adjustment to be paid in 2016.$28,488.
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Net cash used in financing activities for the year ended December 31, 20152018, was $7,302. The primary drivers for the$42,493. This cash outflow from financing activities were $18,088 paid towas the result of net debt payments of $26,300, the purchase shares of CTS commontreasury stock and $5,291 of $9,440, dividend payments which were partially offset by net proceedsof $5,285, and taxes paid on long-term debtbehalf of $15,700.equity award participants of $1,468.









Capital Resources
CTS has an unsecured revolving credit facility; which has an extended term through January 10, 2020.
Long-term debt was comprised of the following:
As ofAs of December 31,
December 31,
2015
December 31,
2014
20182017
Revolving credit facility due in 2020$90,700
$75,000
Total credit facility$300,000
$300,000
Balance Outstanding$50,000
$76,300
Standby letters of credit$1,940
$2,065
Amount available$248,060
$221,635
Weighted-average interest rate1.5%1.5%3.10%2.30%
Amount available$106,985
$122,535
Total credit facility$200,000
$200,000
Standby letters of credit$2,315
$2,465
Commitment fee percentage per annum0.25%0.25%0.20%0.25%
On August 10, 2015, we entered into an unsecured five-year revolving credit agreement (“Revolving Credit Facility”) with a group of banks in order to support our financing needs.  The Revolving Credit Facility originally provided for a credit line of $200,000. On May 23, 2016, we requested and received a $100,000 increase in the aggregate revolving credit commitments under our existing credit agreement, which increased the credit line from $200,000 to $300,000. 
The revolving credit facilityRevolving Credit Facility requires, among other things, that CTSwe comply with a maximum total leverage ratio and a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio.  Failure of CTS to comply with these covenants could reduce the borrowing availability under the revolving credit facility.  CTS wasRevolving Credit Facility.  We were in compliance with all debt covenants at December 31, 2015.2018. 
On February 12, 2019, CTS usesentered into a new amended and restated five-year credit agreement with a group of banks that expires on February 12, 2024. This credit agreement provides for a revolving credit facility of $300 million, which may be increased by $150 million at the request of the Company, subject to the administrative agent’s approval. This new unsecured credit facility replaces the prior $300 million unsecured credit facility, which would have expired August 10, 2020. Borrowings of $50 million under the prior credit agreement were refinanced and the prior agreement was terminated as of February 12, 2019.
We use interest rate swaps to convert the line of credit’sRevolving Credit Facility’s variable rate of interest into a fixed rate on a portion of the debt.our debt balance. In the second quarter of 2012, CTSwe entered into four separate one-year interest rate swap agreements to fix interest rates on $50,000 of long-term debt for the periods January 2013 to January 2017. In the third quarter of 2012, CTSwe entered into four separateadditional one-year interest rate swap agreements to fix interest rates on $25,000 of long-term debt for the periods January 2013 to January 2017. In the third quarter of 2016, we entered into three additional one-year interest rate swap agreements to fix interest rates on $50,000 of long-term debt for the periods August 2017 to August 2020. The difference to be paid or received under the terms of the swap agreements iswill be recognized as an adjustment to interest expense for the related line of credit when settled.
During the year ended December 31, 2015, CTS repurchased 984,382 shares of its common stock at a total cost of $18,088 or an average price of $18.37 per share.

CTS CORPORATION 25

Table of Contents

Generally, CTS' practice and intention is to reinvest the earnings of its non-U.S. subsidiaries in those operations. However, CTS determined during 2015 that as a result of changes in the business, the foreign earnings of its subsidiaries in Canada and the U.K. were no longer permanently reinvested. Therefore, a provision for the expected taxes on repatriation of those earnings was recorded. Any repatriation may not result in significant cash income tax payments as the taxable event would likely be offset by the utilization of the then available tax credits, resulting in no net cash taxes being incurred. CTS does not provide for U.S. income taxes on undistributed earnings of its foreign subsidiaries that are intended to be permanently reinvested.
We have historically funded our capital and operating needs primarily through cash flows from operating activities, supported by available credit under our credit agreements.Revolving Credit Facility. We believe that cash flows from operating activities and available borrowings under our current credit agreementsRevolving Credit Facility will be adequate to fund our working capital needs, capital expenditures, and debt service requirements for at least the next twelve months. However, we may choose to pursue additional equity and debt financing or repatriate cash held in foreign locations to provide additional liquidity or to fund acquisitions.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Management prepared the consolidated financial statements of CTS under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These principles require the use of estimates, judgments, and assumptions. We believe that the estimates, judgments, and assumptions we used are reasonable, based upon the information available.
Our estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts in our financial statements. The following accounting policies comprise those that we believe are the most critical in understanding and evaluating CTS'our reported financial results.
Revenue Recognition
Beginning in January 2018, CTS adopted the provisions of Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2014-09, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)". Product revenue is recognized when the transfer of promised goods to a customer occurs in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods. We follow the five step model to determine when this transfer has occurred: 1) identify the contract(s) with the customer; 2) identify the performance obligations in the contract; 3) determine the transaction price; 4) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; 5) recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation.

Prior to January 1, 2018, product revenue was recognized once four criteria arewere met: (1)1) we have persuasive evidence that an arrangement exists; (2)2) delivery has occurred and title has passed to the customer, which generally happens at the point of shipment provided that no significant obligations remain; (3)3) the price is fixed and determinable; and (4)4) collectability is reasonably assured.
Product Warranties
Provisions for estimated warranty expenses primarily related to our automotive products are made at the time products are sold. These estimates are established using a quoted industry rate. We adjust our warranty reserve for any known or anticipated warranty claims as new information becomes available. We evaluate our warranty obligations at least quarterly and adjust our accruals if it is probable that future costs will be different than our current reserve. Over the last three years, product warranty reserves have ranged from 0.5% to 2.4% of total sales. We believe our reserve level is appropriate considering all facts and circumstances surrounding any outstanding quality claims and our historical experience selling our products to our customers.
Accounts Receivable
We have standardized credit granting and review policies and procedures for all customer accounts, including:
Credit reviews of all new significant customer accounts,
Ongoing credit evaluations of current customers,
Credit limits and payment terms based on available credit information,
Adjustments to credit limits based upon payment history and the customer's current credit worthiness,creditworthiness,
An active collection effort by regional credit functions, reporting directly to the corporate financial officers, and
Limited credit insurance on the majority of our international receivables.
We reserve for estimated credit losses based upon historical experience and specific customer collection issues. Over the last three years, accounts receivable reserves have been approximately 0.2%ranged from 0.3% to 0.7% of total accounts receivable. We believe our reserve level is appropriate considering the quality of the portfolio. While credit losses have historically been within expectations andof the reserves established, we cannot guarantee that our credit loss experience will continue to be consistent with historical experience.
Inventories
We value our inventories at the lower of the actual cost to purchase or manufacture using the first-in, first-out ("FIFO") method, or the current estimated marketnet realizable value. We review inventory quantities on hand and record a provision for excess and obsolete inventory based on forecasts of product demand and production requirements.
Over the last three years, our reserves for excess and obsolete inventories have ranged from 12.5%11.2% to 20.1%19.5% of gross inventory. We believe our reserve level is appropriate considering the quantities and quality of the inventories.

26 CTS CORPORATION

Table of Contents

Retirement Plans
Actuarial assumptions are used in determining pension income and expense and our pensiondefined benefit obligation.obligations. We utilize actuaries from consulting companies in each applicable country to develop our discount rates, that matchmatching high-quality bonds currently available and expected to be available during the period to maturity of the pension benefit in order to provide the necessary future cash flows to pay the accumulated benefits when due. After considering the recommendations of our actuaries, we have assumed a discount rate, expected rate of return on plan assets, and a rate of compensation increase in determining our annual pension income and expense and the projected benefit obligation. During the fourth quarter of each year, we review our actuarial assumptions in light of current economic factors to determine if the assumptions need to be adjusted. Changes in the actuarial assumptions could have a material effect on our results of operations.
ValuationImpairment of Goodwill
Goodwill of a reporting unit is tested for impairment annually, or more frequently if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more-likely-than-not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. Examples of such events or circumstances include:include, but are not limited to, the following:
Significant decline in market capitalization relative to net book value,
Significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate,

Adverse action or assessment by a regulator,
Unanticipated competition,
More-likely-than-not expectation that a reporting unit or a significant portion of a reporting unit will be sold or otherwise disposed of,
Testing for recoverability of a significant asset group within a reporting unit, and
Allocation of a portion of goodwill to a business to be disposed.
If CTS believeswe believe that one or more of the above indicators of impairment have occurred, we performsperform an impairment test. We have the option to perform a qualitative assessment (commonly referred to as "step zero" test) to determine whether further quantitative analysis for impairment of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets is necessary. The qualitative assessment includes a review of macroeconomic conditions, industry and market considerations, internal cost factors, and our own overall financial and share price performance, among other factors. If, after assessing the totality of events or circumstances we determine that it is not more-likely-than-not that the test involvesfair value of a two-step process.reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, we do not need to perform a quantitative analysis.
If a quantitative assessment is required, we estimate the fair value of each reporting unit using a combination of discounted cash flow analysis and market-based valuation methodologies. Determining fair value using a quantitative approach requires significant judgment, including judgments about projected revenues, operating expenses, working capital investment, capital expenditures, and cash flows over a multi-year period. The first stepdiscount rate applied to our forecasts of future cash flows is based on our estimated weighted average cost of capital. In assessing the reasonableness of our determined fair values, we evaluate our results against our market capitalization. Changes in these estimates and assumptions could materially affect the determination of fair value and impact the goodwill impairment test involves comparingassessment.
Our latest assessment was performed using a qualitative approach as of October 1, 2018, and we determined that it was likely that the fair values of the applicable reporting units with their aggregate carrying values, including goodwill. We generally determine the fair value of our reporting units using two valuation methods: "Income Approach — Discounted Cash Flow Method"were more than their carrying amounts, and "Market Approach — Guideline Public Company Method". The approach defined below is based upon our lasttherefore no impairment test conducted as of December 31, 2015.
Under the "Income Approach — Discounted Cash Flow Method", the key assumptions consider sales, cost of sales and operating expenses projected through the year 2020. These assumptionscharges were determined by management utilizing our internal operating plan and assuming growth rates for revenues, operating expenses, and gross margin assumptions. The fourth key assumption under this approach is the discount rate which is determined by looking at current risk-free rates, current market interest rates and the evaluation of risk premium relevant to the business segment. If our assumptions relative to growth rates were to change or were incorrect, our fair value calculation may change which could result in impairment.
Under the "Market Approach — Guideline Public Company Method", we identified eight publicly traded companies, including CTS, which we believe have significant relevant similarities. For these eight companies, we calculated the mean ratio of invested capital to revenues and invested capital to EBITDA. Similar to the Income approach discussed above, sales, cost of sales, operating expenses and their respective growth rates were the key assumptions utilized. The market prices of CTS and other guideline company shares are also key assumptions. If these market prices increase, the estimated market value would increase. If the market prices decrease, the estimated market value would decrease.
The results of these two methods are weighted based upon management's determination. The Market approach is based upon historical and current economic conditions, which might not reflect the long-term prospects or opportunities for CTS' business being evaluated.

CTS CORPORATION 27

Table of Contents

If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds the reporting unit's fair value, we perform the second step of the goodwill impairment test to determine the amount of impairment loss, which involves comparing the implied fair value of the affected reporting unit's goodwill with the carrying value of that goodwill.
There have not been any significant changes to our impairment testing methodology other than updates to the assumptions to reflect the current market environment. As discussed above, key assumptions used in the first step of the goodwill impairment test were determined by management utilizing the internal operating plan. The key assumptions utilized include forecasted growth rates for revenues and operating expenses as well as a discount rate which is determined by looking at current risk-free rates of capital, current market interest rates and the evaluation of a risk premium relevant to the business segment. CTSrecorded. We will monitor future results and will perform a test if indicators trigger an impairment review.
We test the impairmentImpairment of goodwill whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Based upon our latest assessment, we determined that our goodwill was not impaired as of December 31, 2015.
Valuation of Long-Lived and Other Intangible and Long-Lived Assets
We evaluate the impairment of identifiable intangibles and other long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors considered that may trigger an impairment review consist of:of, but are not limited to, the following:
Significant decline in market capitalization relative to net book value,
Significant underperformance relative to expected historical or projected future operating results,
Significant changes in the manner of use of the acquired assets or the strategy for the overall business,
Significant negative industry or economic trends,
Significant decline in CTS' stock price for a sustained period, and
Significant decline in market capitalization relative to net book value.trends.
If CTS believeswe believe that one or more of the above indicators of impairment have occurred, andwe perform a recoverability test by comparing the carrying amount of an asset or asset group to the sum of the undiscounted cash flow test failedflows expected to result from the use and the eventual disposition of the asset or asset group. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value. No indicators of impairment were identified during the year ended December 31, 2018.
Environmental and Legal Contingencies
U.S. GAAP requires a liability to be recorded for contingencies when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be reasonably estimated. Significant judgment is required to determine the existence and amounts of our environmental, legal and other contingent liabilities. We regularly consult with attorneys and consultants to determine the relevant facts and circumstances before we record a liability. Changes in laws, regulatory orders, cost estimates, participation of other parties, timing of payments, input of attorneys and consultants, or other circumstances may have a material impact on the case of amortizable assets, it measures impairment based on projected discounted cash flows using a discount rate that incorporates the risk inherent in the cash flows.recorded liability.



Income Taxes
CTS identified, evaluated, and measured the amount ofOur income tax benefits to be recognized for all of our income tax positions. Included inexpense, deferred tax assets and liabilities, and liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits reflect management’s best estimate of current and future taxes to be paid. We are subject to income taxes in the United States and numerous foreign jurisdictions. Significant judgments and estimates are required in the determination of consolidated income tax expense.
Deferred income taxes arise from temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts in the financial statements, which will result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future. In evaluating our ability to recover our deferred tax assets in the jurisdiction from which they arise, we consider all available positive and negative evidence, including scheduled reversals of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, tax-planning strategies, and results of recent operations. The assumptions about future taxable income require the use of significant judgment and are consistent with the plans and estimates we are using to manage our underlying businesses.
The calculation of our tax liabilities involves dealing with uncertainties in the application of complex tax laws and regulations in a multitude of jurisdictions across our global operations. Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) No. 740 states that a tax benefit from an uncertain tax position may be recognized when it is more-likely-than-not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes, on the basis of its technical merits.  We record unrecognized tax benefits as liabilities in accordance with ASC 740 and adjust these liabilities when our judgment changes as a result of the evaluation of new information not previously available. Because of the complexity of some of these uncertainties, the ultimate resolution may result in a payment that is materially different from our current estimate of the unrecognized tax benefit liabilities. These differences will be reflected as increases or decreases to federal, state and foreign net operating losses. CTS intends to utilize these net operating loss carryforwards to offset future income taxes.tax expense in the period in which new information is available.
CTS'Our practice is to recognize interest and penalties related to income tax matters as part of income tax expense.
CTS earns a significant amount of its operating incomeGenerally, outside of Canada and the U.S., which is generallyUnited Kingdom, it has been our historical practice to permanently reinvest the earnings of our non-U.S. subsidiaries in those operations. As previously noted, the Tax Act made significant changes to the taxation of undistributed foreign earnings, requiring that all previously untaxed earnings and profits of our controlled foreign corporation be subjected to a one-time mandatory deemed repatriation tax. The transition tax substantially eliminated the basis difference that existed prior to be permanently reinvested inthe Tax Act. However, there are limited other taxes that could continue to apply such as foreign jurisdictions. However, CTS determined during 2015 thatwithholding and certain state taxes. We completed the evaluation of our indefinite reinvestment assertion as a result of changesthe Tax Act during the fourth quarter of 2018 and decided not to reinvest the current year earnings of our primary operations, except for in the business, the foreign earnings of its subsidiaries in CanadaCzech Republic, Denmark, India, Mexico and the U.K. were no longer permanently reinvested. Therefore, a provision for the expected taxes on repatriation of those earnings was recorded. CTS does notTaiwan. We intend to repatriate funds beyondcontinue to indefinitely reinvest the amount from its Canadian and U.K. subsidiaries; however, should CTS require more capitalearnings in the U.S. than is generated by our domestic operations, CTS could elect to repatriate funds held in foreign jurisdictions or raise capital in the U.S. through debt or equity issuances. Repatriation would result in a higher effective tax rate. Borrowing in the U.S. would result in increased interest expense.these non-U.S. subsidiaries.






28 CTS CORPORATION

Table of Contents

Contractual Obligations
CTS'Our contractual obligations as of December 31, 20152018, were:
Payments due by periodPayments due by period
Total20162017-20182019-20202021-beyondTotal20192020-20212022-20232024-beyond
Long-term debt, including interest$97,869
$2,165
$2,798
$92,906
$
$51,680
$1,045
$50,635
$
$
Operating lease payments12,959
3,370
5,148
3,294
1,147
31,029
3,859
6,209
4,875
16,086
Retirement obligations6,726
781
1,577
1,369
2,999
6,663
779
1,476
1,370
3,038
Total$117,554
$6,316
$9,523
$97,569
$4,146
$89,372
$5,683
$58,320
$6,245
$19,124
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements, except for operating leases, that have a material current effect or are reasonably likely to have a material future effect on our financial condition or changes in our financial condition.
Management believes that existing capital resources and funds generated from operations are sufficient to finance anticipated capital requirements.
Forward-Looking Statements
This document contains statements that are, or may be deemed to be, forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, any financial or other guidance, statements that reflect our current expectations concerning future results and events, and any other statements that are not based solely on historical fact. Forward-looking statements are based on management's expectations, certain assumptions and currently available information. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof and are based on various assumptions as to future events, the occurrence of which necessarily are subject to uncertainties. These forward-looking statements are made subject to certain risks, uncertainties and other factors, which could cause our actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those presented in the forward-looking statements. Examples of factors that may affect future operating results and financial condition include, but are not limited to: changes in the economy generally and in respect to the business in which CTS operates; unanticipated issues in integrating acquisitions; the results of actions to reposition our business; rapid technological change; general market conditions in the automotive, communications, and computer industries, as well as conditions in the industrial, defense and aerospace, and medical markets; reliance on key customers; unanticipated natural disasters or other events; the ability to protect our intellectual property; pricing pressures and demand for our products; and risks associated with our international operations, including trade and tariff barriers, exchange rates and political and geopolitical risks. Many of these and other risks and uncertainties are discussed in further detail in Item 1A. of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015. We undertake no obligation to publicly update our forward-looking statements to reflect new information or events or circumstances that arise after the date hereof, including market or industry changes.
*****


CTS CORPORATION 29


Item 7A.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
(in thousands)
Our cash flows and earnings are subject to fluctuations resulting from changes in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates. We manage our exposure to these market risks through internally established policies and procedures and, when deemed appropriate, through the use of derivative financial instruments. Our policies do not allow speculation in derivative instruments for profit or execution of derivative instrument contracts for which there are no underlying exposures. We do not use financial instruments for trading purposes and we are not a party to any leveraged derivatives. We monitor our underlying market risk exposures on an ongoing basis and believe that we can modify or adapt our hedging strategies as needed.
Interest Rate Risk
We are exposed to risk of changes in interest rates on our revolving credit facility. There was $90,700$50,000 and $75,000$76,300 outstanding under our revolving credit facility at December 31, 20152018, and 2014,2017, respectively. As of December 31, 2015,2018, we had $75,000 in interest rate swaps that fix the interest costcosts on that portion$50,000 of our debt. The remaining portion of $15,700 is exposed to interest rate risk and at December 31, 2015 a one percentage point increase in interest rates would increase interest expense by approximately $157.long-term debt through August 2020.
Foreign Currency Risk
We are exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risks. Our significant foreign subsidiaries are located in Canada (operations ceased in 2015), China, Czech Republic, Mexico, Scotland, Singapore and Taiwan. As of December 31, 2015,2018, we did not have anyhad $15,700 outstanding foreign currency forward exchange contracts.
Incontracts to hedge our exposure against the normal course of business, our financial position is routinely subjected to a variety of risks, including market risks associated with interest rate movements, currency rate movements on non-U.S. dollar denominated assets and liabilities.Mexican Peso.
Commodity Price Risk
Many of our products require the use of raw materials that are produced in only a limited number of regions around the world or are available from only a limited number of suppliers. Our results of operations may be materially and adversely affected if we have difficulty obtaining these raw materials, the quality of available raw materials deteriorates, or there are significant price increases for these raw materials. For periods in which the prices of these raw materials are rising, we may be unable to pass on the increased cost to our customers, which would result in decreased margins for the products in which they are used. For periods in which the prices are declining, we may be required to write down our inventory carrying cost of these raw materials, since we record our inventory at the lower of cost or market.net realizable value.

30 CTS CORPORATION


Item 8.  Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


Board of Directors and Shareholders
CTS Corporation
Opinion on the financial statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of CTS Corporation (an Indiana corporation) and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the related consolidated statements of earnings, comprehensive earnings, changes in shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018, and the related notes and financial statement schedule included under Item 15(a) (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, thefinancial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Companyas of December 31, 2018 and 2017, and the results of itsoperations and itscash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, based on criteria established in the 2013 Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”), and our report dated February 22, 2019 expressed an unqualified opinion.
Basis for opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2005.



/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP            
Chicago, Illinois
February 22, 2019








REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


Board of Directors and Shareholders
CTS Corporation

We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of CTS Corporation (an Indiana corporation) and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2015,2018, based on criteria established in the 2013 Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)(“COSO”). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, based on criteria established in the 2013 Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by COSO.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the year ended December 31, 2018, and our report dated February 22, 2019 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.
Basis for opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and limitations of internal control over financial reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015, based on criteria established in the 2013 Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by COSO.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015, and our report dated February 24, 2016, expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP            
Chicago, Illinois
February 24, 2016




CTS CORPORATION 31




REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors and Shareholders
CTS Corporation

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of CTS Corporation (an Indiana corporation) and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the related consolidated statements of earnings (loss), comprehensive earnings, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2015. Our audits of the basic consolidated financial statements included the financial statement schedule listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(2). These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of CTS Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2015 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015, based on criteria established in the 2013 Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated February 24, 2016 expressed an unqualified opinion.


/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP            
Chicago, Illinois
February 24, 201622, 2019



32 CTS CORPORATION


CTS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Earnings (Loss)
(in thousands)
Year Ended December 31,Years Ended December 31,
201520142013201820172016
Net sales$382,310
$404,021
$409,461
$470,483
$422,993
$396,679
Cost of goods sold255,201
274,058
288,108
305,510
282,562
256,251
Gross Margin127,109
129,963
121,353
164,973
140,431
140,428
Selling, general and administrative expenses57,430
59,136
69,989
73,569
71,943
61,624
Research and development expenses22,461
22,563
23,222
25,304
25,146
24,040
Non-recurring environmental expense14,541


Restructuring and impairment charges14,564
5,941
10,455
5,062
4,139
3,048
Loss (gain) on sale of assets
708
(11,450)
Operating earnings18,113
42,323
17,687
61,038
38,495
63,166
Other (expense) income: 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest expense(2,628)(2,326)(3,264)(2,085)(3,343)(3,702)
Interest income3,073
2,786
1,901
1,826
1,284
1,305
Other (expense) income(6,297)(3,435)1,739
(2,676)3,817
(3,524)
Total other (expense) income(5,852)(2,975)376
Earnings from continuing operations before taxes12,261
39,348
18,063
Total other (expense) income, net(2,935)1,758
(5,921)
Earnings before taxes58,103
40,253
57,245
Income tax expense5,307
12,826
16,066
11,571
25,805
22,865
Earnings from continuing operations6,954
26,522
1,997
Discontinued operations 
 
 
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax

(5,926)

Net earnings (loss)
$6,954
$26,522
$(3,929)
Net earnings (loss) per share: 
 
 
Basic: 
 
 
Continuing operations$0.21
$0.79
$0.06
Discontinued operations

(0.18)

Net earnings (loss) per share
$0.21
$0.79
$(0.12)
Diluted: 
 
 
Continuing operations$0.21
$0.78
$0.06
Discontinued operations

(0.18)

Diluted net earnings (loss) per share
$0.21
$0.78
$(0.12)
Net earnings$46,532
$14,448
$34,380
Net earnings per share: 
 
 
Basic1.41
0.44
1.05
Diluted1.39
0.43
1.03
Basic weighted-average common shares outstanding32,959
33,618
33,601
33,024
32,892
32,728
Effect of dilutive securities525
512
648
545
528
523

Diluted weighted-average common shares outstanding
33,484
34,130
34,249
33,569
33,420
33,251

Cash dividends declared per share
$0.160
$0.160
$0.145
$0.16
$0.16
$0.16
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

CTS CORPORATION 33


CTS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Earnings
(in thousands)

Year Ended December 31,Years Ended December 31,
201520142013201820172016
Net earnings (loss)$6,954
$26,522
$(3,929)
Net earnings$46,532
$14,448
$34,380
Other comprehensive earnings (loss): 
 
 
 
 
 
Changes in fair market value of hedges, net of tax157
(40)384
795
110
553
Changes in unrealized pension cost, net of tax6,809
(21,062)37,738
(1,830)13,687
6,412
Cumulative translation adjustment, net of tax(1,738)(1,234)585
(311)437
(1,154)
Other comprehensive earnings (loss)$5,228
$(22,336)$38,707
Other comprehensive (loss) earnings$(1,346)$14,234
$5,811
Comprehensive earnings$12,182
$4,186
$34,778
$45,186
$28,682
$40,191
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.


34 CTS CORPORATION


CTS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands)
December 31,December 31,
2015201420182017
ASSETS 
 
 
 
Current Assets 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents$156,928
$134,508
$100,933
$113,572
Accounts receivable, net54,563
56,894
79,518
70,584
Inventories, net24,600
27,887
43,486
36,596
Other current assets15,888
21,112
15,422
12,857
Total current assets251,979
240,401
239,359
233,609
Property, plant and equipment, net69,872
71,414
99,401
88,247
Other Assets 
 
 
 
Prepaid pension asset33,779
32,099
54,100
57,050
Goodwill33,865
32,047
71,057
71,057
Other intangible assets, net34,758
36,592
60,180
66,943
Deferred income taxes58,544
43,120
22,201
20,694
Other assets1,336
1,253
2,043
2,096
Total other assets162,282
145,111
209,581
217,840
Total Assets$484,133
$456,926
$548,341
$539,696
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY 
 
 
 
Current Liabilities 
 
 
 
Accounts payable$40,299
$43,343
$51,975
$49,201
Accrued payroll and benefits7,147
11,283
14,671
11,867
Accrued expenses and other liabilities53,905
25,356
37,347
41,344
Total current liabilities101,351
79,982
103,993
102,412
Long-term debt90,700
75,000
50,000
76,300
Long-term pension obligations2,703
3,049
6,510
7,201
Deferred income taxes3,990
3,802
Other long-term obligations7,725
9,106
5,919
6,176
Total Liabilities202,479
167,137
170,412
195,891
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 10)



Shareholders' Equity 
 
 
 
Common stock300,909
299,892
306,697
304,777
Additional contributed capital41,166
39,153
42,820
41,084
Retained earnings381,840
380,145
478,847
420,160
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(99,005)(104,233)(97,739)(78,960)
Total shareholders' equity before treasury stock624,910
614,957
730,625
687,061
Treasury stock(343,256)(325,168)(352,696)(343,256)
Total shareholders' equity281,654
289,789
377,929
343,805
Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity$484,133
$456,926
$548,341
$539,696
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

CTS CORPORATION 35


CTS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)
Year Ended December 31,Years Ended December 31,
201520142013201820172016
Cash flows from operating activities: 
 
 
 
 
 
Net earnings (loss)$6,954
$26,522
$(3,929)
Net earnings$46,532
$14,448
$34,380
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities: 
 
 
 
 
 
Depreciation and amortization16,254
16,971
21,169
22,514
20,674
18,992
Equity-based compensation3,195
2,660
4,219
Restructuring, impairment, and restructuring-related charges6,915
5,941
11,899
Restructuring loss on pension settlement8,280


Amortization of retirement benefit adjustments2,544
5,722
8,138
Non-recurring environmental expense14,541


Stock-based compensation5,256
4,184
2,738
Pension and other post-retirement plan expense (income)422
11,570
(1,599)
Deferred income taxes(8,920)4,900
12,568
(1,008)16,710
10,297
Loss on sale of EMS business

1,229
Gain on sale of assets(2,156)(1,915)(1,657)
Loss (gain) on sale of assets
708
(11,450)
(Gain) loss on foreign currency hedges, net of cash received(82)94
(36)
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions and divestitures: 
 
 
 
 
 
Accounts receivable1,036
4,356
(6,075)(9,877)(5,198)(7,120)
Inventories2,225
3,437
(2,511)(7,521)(5,404)(2,290)
Other assets4,090
(5,672)931
(2,675)(1,531)(289)
Accounts payable(5,126)(2,692)4,716
5,113
5,387
537
Accrued payroll and benefits2,349
(1,666)1,876
Accrued expenses(9,270)(18,922)733
(3,795)28
451
Income taxes payable5,264
262
(15)1,564
(4,555)966
Other liabilities(2,502)(721)232
(258)2,918
52
Pension and other post-retirement plans(4,700)(8,426)(14,076)(382)(319)(303)
Total adjustments31,670
5,901
41,500
11,620
43,600
12,822
Net cash provided by operating activities38,624
32,423
37,571
58,152
58,048
47,202
Cash flows from investing activities: 
 
 
 
 
 
Capital expenditures(9,723)(12,949)(13,982)(28,488)(18,094)(20,500)
Proceeds from sale of assets1,878
4,951
1,768
3
541
12,296
Proceeds from sale of EMS business

75,000
Payment for acquisitions, net of cash acquired(1,285)


(19,121)(73,063)
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities(9,130)(7,998)62,786
Net cash used in investing activities(28,485)(36,674)(81,267)
Cash flows from financing activities: 
 
 
 
 
 
Payments of long-term debt(1,343,500)(1,030,200)(3,864,500)(1,060,100)(1,518,200)(2,458,400)
Proceeds from borrowings of long-term debt1,359,200
1,030,200
3,786,000
1,033,800
1,505,400
2,456,800
Payments of short-term notes payable(164)(810)(2,218)
(1,150)
Proceeds from borrowings of short-term notes payable164
810
2,218
Purchase of treasury stock(18,088)(8,002)(6,208)(9,440)

Dividends paid(5,291)(5,374)(4,874)(5,285)(5,260)(5,234)
Exercise of stock options64
1,204
2,722
Excess tax benefit on equity-based compensation313
297
117
Other
(3,132)177
Taxes paid on behalf of equity award participants(1,468)(1,604)(1,809)
Net cash used in financing activities(7,302)(15,007)(86,566)(42,493)(20,814)(8,643)
Effect of exchange rate on cash and cash equivalents228
722
1,006
187
(793)(415)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents22,420
10,140
14,797
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents(12,639)(233)(43,123)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year134,508
124,368
109,571
113,572
113,805
156,928
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year$156,928
$134,508
$124,368
$100,933
$113,572
$113,805
Supplemental cash flow information: 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash paid for interest$2,415
$2,113
$3,104
$1,582
$2,130
$2,939
Cash paid for income taxes, net$6,779
$7,994
$6,431
$9,916
$10,884
$10,471
Non-cash investing and financing activities:





Purchase of assets with short-term notes payable$
$
$1,006
Capital expenditures incurred not paid$4,312
$5,914
$3,214
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.


36 CTS CORPORATION


CTS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity
(in thousands)
Common
Stock
Additional
Contributed
Capital
Retained
Earnings
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Earnings/(Loss)
Treasury
Stock
Total
Common
Stock
Additional
Contributed
Capital
Retained
Earnings
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Earnings/(Loss)
Treasury
Stock
Total
Balances at January 1, 2013$291,512
$40,008
$367,800
$(120,604)$(310,958)$267,758
Net loss

(3,929)

(3,929)
Changes in fair market value of hedges, net of tax


384

384
Changes in unrealized pension cost, net of tax


37,738

37,738
Cumulative translation adjustment, net of tax


585

585
Cash dividends of $0.145 per share

(4,874)

(4,874)
Acquired 419,190 shares for treasury stock



(6,208)(6,208)
Issued shares on exercise of options — net2,722
31



2,753
Issued shares on vesting of restricted stock units2,930
(4,744)


(1,814)
Tax benefit on vesting of restricted stock units
117



117
Stock compensation
4,219



4,219
Balances at December 31, 2013$297,164
$39,631
$358,997
$(81,897)$(317,166)$296,729
Balances at January 1, 2016$300,909
$41,166
$381,840
$(99,005)$(343,256)$281,654
Net earnings

26,522


26,522


34,380


34,380
Changes in fair market value of hedges, net of tax


(40)
(40)


553

553
Changes in unrealized pension cost, net of tax


(21,062)
(21,062)


6,412

6,412
Cumulative translation adjustment, net of tax


(1,234)
(1,234)


(1,154)
(1,154)
Cash dividends of $0.16 per share

(5,374)

(5,374)

(5,241)

(5,241)
Acquired 460,496 shares for treasury stock



(8,002)(8,002)
Issued shares on exercise of options — net1,328
(124)


1,204
Issued shares on vesting of restricted stock units1,400
(3,311)


(1,911)1,923
(3,307)


(1,384)
Tax benefit on vesting of restricted stock units
297



297
Stock compensation
2,660



2,660

2,662



2,662
Balances at December 31, 2014$299,892
$39,153
$380,145
$(104,233)$(325,168)$289,789
Balances at December 31, 2016$302,832
$40,521
$410,979
$(93,194)$(343,256)$317,882
Net earnings

6,954


6,954


14,448


14,448
Changes in fair market value of hedges, net of tax


157

157



110

110
Changes in unrealized pension cost, net of tax


6,809

6,809



13,687

13,687
Cumulative translation adjustment, net of tax


(1,738)
(1,738)


437

437
Cash dividends of $0.16 per share


(5,259)

(5,259)

(5,267)

(5,267)
Acquired 984,342 shares for treasury stock



(18,088)(18,088)
Issued shares on exercise of options — net64




64
Issued shares on vesting of restricted stock units953
(1,495)


(542)1,945
(3,549)


(1,604)
Tax benefit on vesting of restricted stock units
313



313
Stock compensation
3,195



3,195

4,112



4,112
Balances at December 31, 2015$300,909
$41,166
$381,840
$(99,005)$(343,256)$281,654
Balances at December 31, 2017$304,777
$41,084
$420,160
$(78,960)$(343,256)$343,805
Net earnings

46,532


46,532
Changes in fair market value of hedges, net of tax


795

795
Changes in unrealized pension cost, net of tax


(1,830)
(1,830)
Cumulative translation adjustment, net of tax


(311)
(311)
Cash dividends of $0.16 per share


(5,278)

(5,278)
Acquired 342,100 shares for treasury stock



(9,440)(9,440)
Issued shares on vesting of restricted stock units1,920
(3,389)


(1,469)
Implementation of ASU No. 2018-02 (see Note 1)

17,433
(17,433)

Stock compensation
5,125



5,125
Balances at December 31, 2018$306,697
$42,820
$478,847
$(97,739)$(352,696)$377,929
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

CTS CORPORATION 37


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except for share and per share data)
NOTE 1 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Description of Business: CTS Corporation ("CTS", "we", "our", "us" or the "Company") is a global manufacturer of sensors, electronic components, and sensors. CTS designs, manufactures, assembles, and sells a broad line of electronic components and sensors. CTS operatesactuators. We operate manufacturing facilities located throughout North America, Asia and Europe and servicesservice major markets globally.
On October 2, 2013, CTS sold its Electronics Manufacturing Solutions ("EMS") business to Benchmark Electronics, Inc. ("Benchmark") for $75,000 in cash. The sale of EMS, along with the announcement of the June 2013 Restructuring Plan ("June 2013 Plan") has allowed CTS to sharpen its focus on its Components and Sensors business. Due to the sale, the 2013 amounts in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings (Loss) related to EMS have been reported separately as Discontinued operations. Refer to NOTE 17, "Discontinued Operations."
CTS consists of one reportable business segment. Prior to the sale of the EMS segment, CTS had two reportable segments: 1) Components and Sensors and 2) EMS. The 2013 segment reporting has been updated to conform to the current period's presentation of one reportable business segment.
Principles of Consolidation: The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of CTS and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
Fiscal Calendar: Through 2015, CTSWe began using a calendar period end in 2016. Prior to that, we operated on a 4 week/ 4 week/ 5 week fiscal quarter, and each fiscal quarter ended on a Sunday. The fiscal yearSunday that always beginsbegan on January 1 and endsended on December 31. CTS' fiscal calendar resulted in some fiscal quarters being either greater than or less than 13 weeks, depending on the days of the week those dates fall in. During the 2015 fiscal year, CTS' quarter end dates were as follows:
March 29
June 28
September 27
December 31

Beginning in 2016, CTS began using a calendar period end.
Use of Estimates: The preparation of financial statements in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("U.S. GAAP") requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.
Cash and Cash Equivalents: All highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less at the date of purchase are considered to be cash equivalents.
Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts: Accounts receivable consists primarily of amounts due to CTS from normal business activities. CTS maintainsWe maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated uncollectible accounts receivable. CTSOur reserves for estimated credit losses are based upon historical experience and specific customer collection issues. Accounts are written off against the allowance account when they are determined to be no longer be collectible.
Concentration of Credit Risk: Financial instruments that potentially subject CTSus to concentrations of credit risk consist of cash and cash equivalents. CTS'equivalents and trade receivables. Our cash and cash equivalents, at times, may exceed federally insured limits. Cash and cash equivalents are deposited primarily in banking institutions with global operations. CTS hasWe have not experienced any losses in such accounts. CTS believes it isWe believe we are not exposed to any significant credit risk on cash and cash equivalents.
Trade receivables subject CTSus to the potential for credit risk with major customers. CTS sells itsWe sell our products to customers principally in the automotive, communications, computer, medical, industrial,aerospace and defense, industrial, information technology, medical, telecommunications, and aerospacetransportation markets, primarily in North America, Europe, and Asia. CTS performsWe perform ongoing credit evaluations of itsour customers to minimize credit risk. CTS doesWe do not require collateral. The allowance for doubtful accounts is based on management's estimates of the collectability of its accounts receivable after analyzing historical bad debts, customer concentrations, customer credit worthiness,creditworthiness, and current economic trends. Uncollectible trade receivables are charged against the allowance for doubtful accounts when all reasonable efforts to collect the amounts due have been exhausted.

38 CTS CORPORATION


Our net sales to significant customers as a percentage of total net sales were as follows:
Year Ended December 31,Years Ended December 31,
201520142013201820172016
Cummins Inc.15.2%13.4%9.9%
Honda Motor Co.10.7%10.8%8.4%10.5%11.2%10.7%
Toyota Motor Corporation10.1%8.4%6.3%10.5%10.2%10.4%
We sell pedal and sensor automotive parts to Honda Motor Co. and Toyota Motor Corporationthese three customers for certain vehicle platforms under purchase agreements that have no volume commitments and are subject to purchase orders issued from time to time.
No other customer accounted for 10% or more of total net sales during these periods.
Inventories: CTS values itsWe value our inventories at the lower of the actual cost to purchase or manufacture or the current estimated marketnet realizable value using the first-in, first-out ("FIFO") method. CTS reviewsWe review inventory quantities on hand and recordsrecord a provision for excess and obsolete inventory based on forecasts of product demand and production requirements.



Retirement Plans: CTS hasWe have various defined benefit and defined contribution retirement plans. CTS'Our policy is to annually fund the defined benefit pension plans at or above the minimum required by law. CTS:We: 1) recognizesrecognize the funded status of a benefit plan (measured as the difference between plan assets at fair value and the benefit obligation) in CTS'our Consolidated Balance Sheets; 2) recognizesrecognize the gains or losses and prior service costs or credits that arise during the period but are not recognized as components of net periodic benefit/cost as a component of Otherother comprehensive income;earnings; and 3) measuresmeasure defined benefit plan assets and obligations as of the date of our fiscal year-end. See NOTE 5,Note 6, "Retirement Plans" for further information.
Property, Plant and Equipment: Property, plant and equipment is stated at cost. Depreciation and amortization is computed primarily over the estimated useful lives of the various classes of assets using the straight-line method. Useful lives for buildings and improvements range from 10 to 45 years. Machinery and equipment useful lives range from 3 to 815 years. Depreciation on leasehold improvements is computed over the lesser of the lease term or estimated useful lives of the assets. Amounts expended for maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Upon disposition, any related gains or losses are included in operating earnings.
Income Taxes: DeferredWe account for income taxes are recognized forunder the future tax effectsasset and liability method, which requires the recognition of temporary differences between financial and income tax reporting based on enacted tax laws and rates. CTS maintains valuation allowances to reduce deferred tax assets ifand liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements. Under this method, we determine deferred tax assets and liabilities on the basis of the differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities by using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. The effect of a change in tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.
We recognize deferred tax assets to the extent that we believe that these assets are more-likely-than-not to be realized. In making such a determination, we consider all available positive and negative evidence, including future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, projected future taxable income, tax-planning strategies, and results of recent operations. If we determine that we would be able to realize our deferred tax assets in the future in excess of their net recorded amount, we would make an adjustment to the deferred tax asset valuation allowance, which would reduce the provision for income taxes. In 2016, we elected to early adopt Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2015-17 "Income Taxes (Topic 740): Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes", on a retrospective basis allowing for all deferred tax items to be classified as non-current. Certain non-current deferred tax assets and non-current deferred tax liabilities were not netted since these items relate to different tax jurisdictions.
We record uncertain tax positions in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 740 on the basis of a two-step process in which (1) we determine whether it is more-likely-than-not that some or allthe tax positions will be sustained on the basis of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. CTS recognizestechnical merits of the benefit ofposition and (2) for those tax positions when a benefit is more likely than not (i.e. greater than 50% likely) to be sustained upon audit based on its technical merits. Recognized tax benefits are measured atthat meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold, we recognize the largest amount of tax benefit that is more-likely-than-notmore than 50 percent likely to be sustained, based on cumulative probability, in finalrealized upon ultimate settlement ofwith the position. CTS recognizesrelated tax authority.
We recognize interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits on the income tax matters as partexpense line in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of incomeOperations. Accrued interest and penalties are included on the related tax expense. liability line in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
See NOTE 16,Note 18, "Income Taxes" for further information.
Goodwill and OtherIndefinite-lived Intangible Assets: Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair values of the net assets acquired in a business combination.
We test the impairment of goodwill at least annually as of the first day of our fourth quarter, or whenevermore frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable.
In 2015addition to goodwill, we changed the date of our annual impairment test from the last day of our fiscal year to the first day of our fourth quarter. This change did not have a material effect on the results of our impairment test. We completed our annual impairment test during 2015 and determined that our goodwill was not impaired as of the measurement date.
Goodwill of a reporting unit is tested for impairment between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more-likely-than-not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. Examples of such events or circumstances include:
Significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate,
Adverse action or assessment by a regulator,
Unanticipated competition,


CTS CORPORATION 39


More-likely-than-not expectation that a reporting unit or a significant portion of a reporting unit will be sold or otherwise disposed of,
Testing for recoverability of a significant asset group within a reporting unit, and
Allocation of a portion of goodwill to a business to be disposed of.
There have not been any significant changes to our impairment testing methodology other than updating the assumptions to reflect the current market environment. CTS will monitor future results and will perform an impairment test if and when indicators trigger an impairment review.
Other intangible assets consist primarily of customer lists and relationships, patents and other intangibles. These assets are recorded at cost and amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated life. The weighted-average remaining amortization period for all of our intangible assets is 9.4 years. The weighted-average remaining amortization period for customer lists and relationships is 12.1 years and for the technology and other intangibles is 5.2 years. We also have acquired in-process research and development ("IPR&D") intangible assets that are treated as indefinite-lived intangible assets and therefore not subject to amortization until the completion or abandonment of the associated research and development efforts. If these efforts are abandoned in the future, the carrycarrying value of the IPR&D asset iswill be expensed. If the research and development efforts are successfully completed, the IPR&D will be reclassified as a finite-lived asset and amortized over its useful life.
We have the option to perform a qualitative assessment (commonly referred to as "step zero" test) to determine whether further quantitative analysis for impairment of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets is necessary. The qualitative assessment includes a review of macroeconomic conditions, industry and market considerations, internal cost factors, and our own overall financial and share price performance, among other factors. If, after assessing the totality of events or circumstances, we determine that it is not more-likely-than-not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, we do not need to perform a quantitative analysis.
We completed our annual impairment test during 2018 by performing a qualitative assessment and determined that our goodwill was not impaired as of the measurement date. We have not recorded any impairment of goodwill or other indefinite-lived intangible assets in the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016.

Other Intangible Assets and Long-lived Assets: We account for long-lived assets (excluding indefinite-lived intangible assets) in accordance with the provisions of ASC 360. This statement requires that long-lived assets, which includes fixed assets and finite-lived intangible assets, be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. If an impairment test is warranted, recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and the eventual disposition of the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount in which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell.
Intangible assets (excluding indefinite-lived intangible assets) consist primarily of technology, customer lists and relationships, patents, and trade names. These assets are recorded at cost and usually amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated lives. We assess useful lives based on the period over which the asset is expected to contribute to cash flows.
Revenue Recognition: Beginning in January 2018, CTS adopted the provisions ASU No. 2014-09, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)". Product revenue is recognized upon the transfer of promised goods to a customer in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods. We follow the five step model to determine when this transfer has occurred: 1) identify the contract(s) with the customer; 2) identify the performance obligations in the contract; 3) determine the transaction price; 4) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; 5) recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation.
Prior to January 1, 2018, product revenue was recognized once four criteria arewere met: 1) CTS haswe have persuasive evidence that an arrangement exists; 2) delivery has occurred and title has passed to the customer, which generally happens at the point of shipment provided that no significant obligations remain; 3) the price is fixed and determinable; and 4) collectability is reasonably assured.
Research and Development: Research and development ("R&D") costs include expenditures for planned search and investigation aimed at discovery of new knowledge to be used to develop new products or processes or to significantly enhance existing products or production processes. Research and developmentR&D costs also include the implementation of new knowledge through design, testing of product alternatives, or construction of prototypes. CTS expensesWe expense all research and developmentR&D costs as incurred, net of customer reimbursements for sales of prototypes and non-recurring engineering charges.
CTS createsWe create prototypes and tools related to R&D projects. A prototype is defined as a constructed product not intended for production. CTSproduction resulting in a commercial sale. We also incursincur engineering costs related to R&D activities. Such costs are incurred to support such activities to improve the reliability, performance and cost-effectiveness of our existing products and to design and develop innovative products that meet customer requirements for new applications. Furthermore, CTSwe may engage in activities that develop tooling machinery and equipment for itsour customers.
Costs ofWe occasionally enter into agreements with our customers whereby we receive a contractual guarantee to be reimbursed the costs we incur to construct molds, dies, and other tools that are used to make many of the products sold for which CTS has a contractual guarantee for lump sum reimbursement from the customerwe sell. The costs we incur are capitalizedincluded in other current assets. Costs for molds, dies, and other tools for which customerassets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets until reimbursement is assured consists of the following in the consolidated balance sheets:
 As of December 31,

20152014
Cost of molds, dies and other tools included in other current assets$3,969
$2,991
CTS may, from time to time, partially recover costs related to these activitiesreceived from the customer. Any reimbursementsReimbursements received from customers are netted against such costs. Acosts and included in our Consolidated Statements of Earnings if the amount received is in excess of the costs that we incur. The following is a summary of amounts to be received from customers as of December 31, 2018 and 2017:
 December 31,

20182017
Cost of molds, dies and other tools included in other current assets$5,388
$3,382
The following is a summary of amounts received from customers is as follows:for molds, dies, and other tools during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017:
 Year Ended December 31,

201520142013
Reimbursements received from customers$1,861
$1,400
$2,087
 Years Ended December 31,

20182017
Reimbursements received from customers$4,483
$4,299
Financial Instruments: CTS usesWe use forward contracts to mitigate currency risk related to forecasted foreign currency revenue and costs. These forward contracts are designed as cash flow hedges. At least quarterly, we assess the effectiveness of these hedging relationships based on the total change in their fair value using regression analysis. In addition, we use interest rate swaps to convert a portion of itsour revolving credit facility's variable rate of interest into a fixed rate. As a result of the use of these derivative instruments, the Company is exposed to the risk that counterparties to derivative contracts will fail to meet their contractual obligations. To mitigate the counterparty credit risk, the Company has a policy of only entering into contracts with carefully selected major financial institutions based upon their credit ratings and other factors. CTS' factors and by using netting agreements. Our

established policies and procedures for mitigating credit risk

40 CTS CORPORATION


on principal transactions include reviewing and establishing limits for credit exposure and continually assessing the creditworthiness of counterparties.
CTS estimatesWe estimate the fair value of itsour financial instruments as follows:
Instrument Method for determining fair value
Cash, cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable Cost, approximates fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments.
Revolving credit facility The fair value of long-term debt approximates carrying value and was determined by valuing a similar hypothetical coupon bond and attributing that value to our credit facility.
Interest rate swaps and forward contracts The fair value of CTS'our interest rate swaps and forward contracts are measured using a market approach which uses current industry information.
Debt Issuance Costs: CTS hasWe have debt issuance costs related to itsour long-term debt that are being amortized using the straight-line method over the life of the debt.
Equity-BasedStock-Based Compensation: CTS recognizesWe recognize expense related to the fair value of equity-basedstock-based compensation awards, consisting of restricted stock units ("RSUs"), cash-settled restricted stock units, and stock options, in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings (Loss).Earnings.
CTS estimatesWe estimate the fair value of stock option awards on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. A number of assumptions are used by the Black-Scholes option pricing model to compute the grant date fair value of an award, including expected price volatility, option term, risk-free interest rate, and dividend yield. These assumptions are established at each grant date based upon current information at that time. Expected volatilities are based on historical volatilities of CTS' common stock. The expected option term is derived from historical data of exercise behavior. Actual option terms can differ from the expected option terms as a result of different groups of employees exhibiting different exercise behavior. The dividend yield is based on historical dividend payments. The risk-free rate for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve at the time of grant. The fair value of awards that are ultimately expected to vest is recognized as expense over the requisite service periods of the awards in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings (Loss).Earnings.
The grant date fair values of our service-based and performance-based RSUs are the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant. The grant date fair value of our market-based RSUs is determined by using a simulation, or Monte Carlo, approach. Under this approach, stock returns from a comparative group of companies are simulated over the performance period, considering both stock price volatility and the correlation of returns. The simulated results are then used to estimate the future payout based on the performance and payout relationship established by the conditions of the award. The future payout is discounted to the measurement date using the risk-free interest rate.
Both CTS'our stock optionsoption and RSUsRSU awards primarily have a graded-vestinggraded vesting schedule. CTS recognizesWe recognize expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for each separately vesting portion of the award as if the award was, in substance, multiple awards. See NOTE 14, "Equity-BasedNote 16, "Stock-Based Compensation" for further information.
In 2016, we elected to early adopt the provisions of ASU No. 2016-09 "Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvement to Employee Share based Payment Accounting". Pursuant to this adoption, we recorded excess tax benefits within income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2016, where previously these were recorded as increases or decreases to additional contributed capital. In addition, we have elected to account for forfeitures of awards as they occur. Both of these changes have been applied prospectively, and therefore no adjustments were made to prior periods. In accordance with the guidance, we retrospectively reported cash paid on behalf of employees for withholding shares for tax-withholding purposes as a financing activity in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. Additionally, excess tax benefits were classified as an operating activity, applied prospectively. Adoption of this ASU did not result in a material change in our earnings, cash flows, or financial position.
Earnings Per Share: Basic earnings per share excludes any dilution and is computed by dividing net earnings available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period.
Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if dilutive securities, such as stock options and unvested restricted stock units, were exercised or other contracts to issue common stock resulted in the issuance of common stock that shared in CTS' earnings.stock. Diluted earnings per share is calculated by adding all potentially dilutive shares to the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the numerator.denominator. If the common stock equivalents have an anti-dilutive effect, they are excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share.
CTS'Our antidilutive stock options and RSUs consist of the following:
Year Ended December 31,Years Ended December 31,
(units)201520142013201820172016
Antidilutive stock options and RSUs13,979

634
18,138
22,110
35,189

Foreign Currencies: The financial statements of CTS'our non-U.S. subsidiaries, except the United Kingdom ("U.K.") subsidiary, are remeasured into U.S. dollars using the U.S. dollar as the functional currency with all remeasurement adjustments included in the determination of net earnings.


CTS CORPORATION 41

Table of Contents

Foreign currency (loss) gaingains (losses) recorded in the Consolidated Statement of Earnings (Loss) includes the following:
 Year Ended December 31,

201520142013
Foreign currency (loss) gain — continuing operations$(6,299)$(4,130)$1,625
Foreign currency (loss) gain — discontinued operations$
$
$(290)
 Years Ended December 31,

201820172016
Foreign currency (losses) gains$(2,619)$3,052
$(3,714)
The assets and liabilities of CTS'our U.K. subsidiary are translated into U.S. dollars at the current exchange rate at period end, with the resulting translation adjustments made directly to the "Accumulated"accumulated other comprehensive loss" component of shareholders' equity. Our Consolidated Statement of Earnings (Loss) accounts are translated at the average rates during the period.
Shipping and Handling: All fees billed to the customer for shipping and handling isare classified as a component of net sales. All costs associated with shipping and handling isare classified as a component of cost of sales.goods sold or operating expenses, depending on the nature of the underlying purchase.
Sales Taxes: CTS classifiesWhen applicable, we classify sales taxes on a net basis in itsour consolidated financial statements.
ImpairmentSubsequent Events: We have evaluated subsequent events and transactions for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements through the date the financial statements are issued.
On February 7, 2019, the Board of Long-lived AssetsDirectors authorized a new stock repurchase program with a maximum dollar limit of $25 million and Long-lived Assetsno set expiration date. This new program replaces the previous program that was approved in April 2015.
On February 12, 2019, CTS entered into an amended and restated five-year Credit Agreement with a group of banks (the “Credit Agreement”). The Credit Agreement provides for a revolving credit facility of $300 million, which may be increased by $150 million at the request of the Company, subject to be Disposed of:the administrative agent’s approval. This new unsecured credit facility replaces the prior $300 million unsecured credit facility, which would have expired August 10, 2020. Borrowings of $50 million under the prior credit agreement were refinanced into the Credit Agreement and the prior agreement was terminated as of February 12, 2019.
Changes in Accounting Principles: Beginning in January 2018, CTS accounts for long-lived assets in accordance withadopted the provisions of ASC 360.ASU No. 2014-09, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)" under the modified retrospective method, which requires a cumulative effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings on the date of adoption. This statement requiresapproach was applied to contracts not completed as of December 31, 2017. At date of adoption, there was no significant change to our past revenue recognition practices and therefore no adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings was required.

Beginning in April 2018, CTS elected to adopt the provisions of ASU No. 2017-12 "Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Target Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities" under the modified retrospective method, which may require a cumulative effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings. Prior to adoption, the company measured hedge effectiveness for all cash flow hedges quarterly and recognized any ineffectiveness in earnings in the current period. Upon adoption the company elected to review hedge effectiveness qualitatively as described further in Note 13 - Derivatives. At the date of adoption there was no significant hedge ineffectiveness recorded in earnings for hedged assets existing as of January 1, 2018, and therefore no adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings was required.

In 2018, CTS adopted the provision of ASU No. 2018-02 "Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income". This ASU allows for the reclassification from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income ("AOCI") to retained earnings for the stranded tax effects resulting from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act that long-lived assetswas enacted in December 2017. The total impact due to adoption of this standard was an increase in retained earnings of $17,433.

Change in Estimate: Beginning in January 2017, we changed the method we use to calculate the service and certain identifiable intangibles be reviewedinterest cost components of net periodic benefit cost for impairment whenever events or changesour U.S. pension and other post-retirement benefit plans. Previously, we calculated the service and interest cost components using a single weighted-average discount rate derived from the yield curve to measure the benefit obligation at the beginning of the period. In 2017, we began using a full yield curve approach in circumstances indicate that the carrying amountestimation of an asset may not be recoverable. If an impairment testthese components of benefit cost by applying the specific spot-rates along the yield curve to the relevant projected cash flows. This approach better aligns each of the projected benefit cash flows to the corresponding spot rates on the yield curve, resulting in a more precise measurement of service and interest costs. The change in method resulted in a decrease in the service and interest components of pension costs in 2017. Any decrease to these components as a result of adoption of this approach is warranted, recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured equally offset

by a comparisondecrease in the actuarial losses included in our accumulated other comprehensive loss, with no impact on the measurement of the carrying amount of an assetbenefit obligation. This change is accounted for prospectively as a change in accounting estimate.
Reclassifications: Certain reclassifications have been made to prior year amounts to conform to the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and the eventual disposition of the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount in which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Assets to be disposed of arecurrent year presentation. The reclassifications had no impact on previously reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell.net earnings.
CTS tests Goodwill for impairment annually and when an impairment triggering event occurs using a fair value approach at the reporting unit level. No goodwill impairment was recorded for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013.
Generally, CTS amortizes the cost of finite-lived intangibles over a straight-line basis using their estimated useful lives except for the cost of customer list intangibles acquired in the Tusonix, Inc. ("Tusonix"), Fordahl S.A. ("Fordahl"), Valpey-Fisher Corporation ("Valpey-Fisher") and D&R Technologies, LLC ("D&R") acquisitions, which are amortized using a 150% double-declining balance method over their estimated useful lives. CTS assesses useful lives based on the period over which the asset is expected to contribute to CTS' cash flows. CTS reviews the carrying value of its intangible assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate an impairment may have occurred. If impaired, the asset is written down to fair value based on either discounted cash flows or appraised values.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
ASU 2015-17,No. 2018-14 “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes”"Compensation - Retirement Benefits - Defined Benefit Plans - General"

In November 2015,August 2018, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued ASU 2015-17, "Income Taxes Topic 740): Balance Sheet ClassificationNo. 2018-14, "Compensation - Retirement Benefits - Defined Benefit Plans - General." This ASU modifies the disclosure requirements for defined benefit and other postretirement plans. This ASU eliminates certain disclosures associated with accumulated other comprehensive income, plan assets, related parties, and the effects of Deferred Taxes".The amendment requires Company'sinterest rate basis point changes on assumed health care costs; while other disclosures have been added to begin classifying all deferred income taxes as non-current. The provisions are expectedaddress significant gains and losses related to simplify the presentation of deferred income taxeschanges in benefit obligations. This ASU also clarifies disclosure requirements for projected benefit and align the presentation of deferred income taxes with the International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS").accumulated benefit obligations. The amendments in this updateASU are effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2020 and for interim periods therein with early adoption permitted. Adoption on a retrospective basis for all periods presented is required. This ASU will impact our financial statement disclosures but will not have an impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
ASU No. 2018-13 "Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework-Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement"
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-13 "Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework-Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement". This ASU modified the disclosures related to recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements. Disclosures related to the transfer of assets between Level 1 and Level 2 hierarchies have been eliminated and various additional disclosures related to Level 3 fair value measurements have been added, modified or removed. This ASU is effective for annual periods beginning after December 16,15, 2019, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted upon issuance of the standard for modified or removed disclosures, with a delay in adoption for the additional required disclosures until their effective date. This ASU is not expected to have a significant impact on our financial statement disclosures.
ASU No. 2016-16 "Income Taxes (Topic 740) Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory"
In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-16, "Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory". This ASU is meant to improve the accounting for the income tax effect of intra-entity transfers of assets other than inventory. Currently, U.S. GAAP prohibits the recognition of current and deferred income taxes for intra-entity asset transfers until the asset is sold to a third party. This ASU will now require companies to recognize the income tax effect of an intra-entity asset transfer (other than inventory) when the transaction occurs. This ASU is effective for public companies in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019 and interim periods within those annual reporting periods. The update canEarly adoption is permitted and is to be applied prospectively or retrospectively. These provisions areon a modified retrospective bases through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption. This guidance is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
ASU 2015-16,No. 2016-02 “Business Combinations"Leases (Topic 805): Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments”842)"
In September 2015,February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2015-16, "Business CombinationsASU 2016-02, "Leases (Topic 805) Simplifying842)", which requires companies to record almost all leases on the balance sheet as a lease liability with a corresponding right of use asset. The lease liability is based on the present value of minimum lease payments discounted using our secured incremental borrowing rate at the date of adoption. Existing deferred rent liability balances, resulting from historical straight-lining of operating leases, will be reclassified upon adoption to reduce the measurement of the lease assets, causing a difference between the lease liability and asset. 
The majority of our leases are operating leases where expense will be recognized in the consolidated statement of income in a manner similar to current accounting guidance. Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments of Inventory". The amendments clarify that an acquirer recognize adjustments to provisional amounts that are identified during the measurement period in the reporting period in which the adjustment amounts are determined. The acquirer needs to record, in the same period’s financial statements, the effect of changes in depreciation,finance leases requires amortization or other income as a result of the changeright-of-use asset and an interest expense component, similar to the provisional amounts as ifprior account for capital leases. Lessor accounting under the accounting had been completed atnew standard is substantially unchanged.
We will adopt the acquisition date. This amendment requires an entitynew standard effective January 1, 2019, and intend to present separatelyelect the optional transition method that allows us to recognize a cumulative effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings on the facedate of adoption, if necessary, without adjusting the comparative periods presented. We have elected the package of practical expedients permitted under the transition guidance, which among other things, allows us to carry forward the historical accounting relating to lease identification and classification for existing leases upon adoption. We have also elected the practical expedient to not separate lease and non-lease

components for the majority of our leases and the election to keep leases with an initial term of 12 months or less off of the income statement or disclose inconsolidated balance sheet.
We have assessed the notes the portionimpact of the amount

42 CTS CORPORATION

Table of Contents

recorded in current period earnings by line item, as if the provisional adjustments had been recognized as of the acquisition date. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015new standard and interim periods within those annual periods. These provisionshave concluded it will not have a material impacteffect on our financial statements.
ASU 2015-15, "Interest - Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements"
In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-15: Interest - Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements. The amended guidance relates to guidance in ASU 2015-03 “Interest - Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs”to require entities to record debt issuance costs as a direct deduction of the related debt liability. ASU 2015-03 did not address debt issuance costs related to line-of-credit arrangements. This update allows entities to continue to record debt issuance costs as an asset and amortize the costs ratably over the term of the line-of-credit arrangement, regardless of whether the entity has borrowings against the line-of-credit arrangement. ASU 2015-15results from operations or cash flows. However it will notmaterially impact our financial statements.
ASU 2015-14, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)"
In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14: Accounting for Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)" The amended guidance deferred the effective date of the ASU 2014-09 "Revenue from Contracts with Customers(Topic 606)" position by increasing lease assets and liabilities. We have estimated our lease liability to annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods within that reporting period. Early adoption is permitted for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016 and interim periods within that annual period. The impact on our financial statements related to ASU 2014-9 "Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)" has not yet been determined.
ASU 2015-11. “Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory”
In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11, "Inventory (Topic 330) Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory". The amendments clarify that an entity should measure inventory within the scope of this update at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling pricesbe in the ordinary courserange of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal,$24-$28 million and transportation. Substantial and unusual losses that result from subsequent measurement of inventory should be disclosed in the financial statements. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those annual periods. The amendments areexpect our lease asset to be applied prospectively with earlier application permitted as oflower than the beginning of an interim or annual reporting period. These provisions are not anticipated to have a material impact on our financial statements.
ASU 2015-08, “Business Combinations (Topic 805): Pushdown Accounting - amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 115
In May 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-08, “Business Combinations (Topic 805): Pushdown Accounting - amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 115”. This ASU amends various SEC paragraphs included in the FASB’s ASC to reflect the issuance of Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 115. SAB 115 rescinds portions of the interpretive guidance included in the SEC’s Staff Accounting Bulletin series and brings existing guidance into conformity with ASU 2014-17, Pushdown Accounting, which provides an acquired entity with an option to apply pushdown accounting in its separate financial statements upon occurrence of an event in which an acquirer obtains control of the acquired entity.
An acquired entity is not only able to apply this amendment to change in control events occurring after the effective date, but is also permitted to apply pushdown accounting as a change in accounting principle to its most recent change in control event that had occurred before the effective date of this new amendment. The decision to apply pushdown accounting to a specific change in control event, if electedlease liability by an acquiree, is irrevocable.
The amendment also amends the reporting for a bargain purchase option. The acquired entity would not report a gain in its income statementapproximately $3 million as a result of a bargain purchase. Rather, the acquiree shall recognize the bargain purchase gain recognized by the acquirer as anour existing deferred rent liability balances. We do not expect any adjustment to additional paid-in capital.
This amendment is effective immediately. This amendment does not have a materialthe opening balance of retained earnings. We will include the impact on our financial statements.
ASU 2015-07, “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosures for Investments in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or Its Equivalent)”
In May 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2015-07, “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosures for Investments in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or Its Equivalent)”. This ASU permits a reporting entity, as a practical expedient, to measure the fair value of certain investments using the net asset value per share of the investment. This amendment applies

CTS CORPORATION 43

Table of Contents

to reporting entities that elect to measurenew standard and the fair value of an investment within the scope of paragraphs 820-10-15-4 through 15-5 using the net asset value per share (or its equivalent) practical expedient in paragraph 820-10-35-59. This amendment removes the requirement to categorize within the fair value hierarchy all investments for which fair value is measured using the net asset value per share practical expedient. It also removes the requirement to make certainadditional required disclosures for all investments that are eligible to be measured at fair value using the net asset value per share practical expedient. Rather, those disclosures are limited to investments for which the entity has elected to measure the fair value using that practical expedient.
The amendments will be effective for annual periods, including interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. An entity should apply the amendments retrospectively to all periods presented. The retrospective approach requires that an investment for which fair value is measured using the net asset value per share practical expedient be removed from the fair value hierarchy in all periods presented in an entity’s financial statements. These provisions are not anticipated to have a material impact onwith our financial statements.
ASU 2015-04, “Compensation - Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Practical ExpedientForm 10-Q for the Measurement Datefirst quarter of an Employer’s Benefit Obligation and Plan Assets2019.
In April 2015, FASB issued ASU 2015-04, “Compensation -Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Practical Expedient for the Measurement Date of an Employer’s Defined Benefit Obligation and Plan Assets”. The amended guidance permits companies to use a practical expedient which allows an employer to measure defined benefit plan assets and obligations as of the month-end date that is closest to the employer’s fiscal year-end (alternative measurement date). An employer using this policy election must apply it consistently to all of its defined benefit plans.
In accordance with this ASU, an employer using the practical expedient is required to adjust the funded status for contributions and other significant events (as defined in paragraph 715-30-35-66) occurring between the alternative measurement date and its fiscal year-end. Paragraph 715-30-35-66 defines a significant event as: a plan amendment, settlement, or curtailment that calls for remeasurement. This ASU also allows employers the use of the practical expedient in interim remeasurements of significant events.NOTE 2 – Revenue Recognition
The employer would be required to disclose the election to use the practical expedient and the measurement date of the plan assets and obligations. Early application of this ASU is permitted. Entities must apply the guidance prospectively.
The guidance is effective for financial statements for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The changes would be effective for employee benefit plans for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. These provisions are not anticipated to have a material impact on our financial statements.
ASU 2015-03, “Interest - Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs
In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, “Interest - Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs”. The amended guidance require that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not affected by the amendments in this ASU. The amendments in this ASU are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years.
Early adoption of this ASU is permitted for financial statements that have not been previously issued. Entities must apply the new guidance on a retrospective basis, wherein the balance sheet of each individual period presented should be adjusted to reflect the period-specific effects of applying the new guidance. Upon transition, an entity is required to comply with the applicable disclosures for a change in an accounting principle. These provisions will not have an impact on our financial statements.
ASU 2014-12, "Compensation — Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period"
In June 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued ASU 2014-12, Compensation — Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period.The amended guidance requires that a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period should be treated as a performance condition.

44 CTS CORPORATION

Table of Contents

Current U.S. GAAP does not contain explicit guidance on whether to treat a performance target that could be achieved after the requisite service period as a performance condition that affects vesting or as a nonvesting condition that affects the grant-date fair value of an award. The amendments in this update provide explicit guidance for those awards.
The amendments are effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Earlier adoption is permitted. Entities may apply the amendments either prospectively to all awards granted or modified after the effective date, or retrospectively to all awards with performance targets that are outstanding as of the beginning of the earliest annual period presented in the financial statements and to all new or modified awards thereafter. These provisions will not have a material impact on our financial statements.
ASU 2014-9, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)"
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-9, Revenue from Contracts with Customers.The guidance in this ASU affects any entity that either enters into contracts with customers to transfer goods or services or enters into contracts for the transfer of nonfinancial assets unless those contracts are within the scope of other standards (for example, insurance contracts or lease contracts). The new revenue recognition guidance more closely aligns U.S. GAAP with International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS"). The core principle of the guidanceASC 606 is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.
To The guidance provides a five-step process to achieve that core principle, an entity should applyprinciple:

Identify the following steps:contract(s) with a customer
Step 1:Identify the contract(s) with a customer.
Step 2:Identify the performance obligations in the contract.
Step 3:Determine the transaction price.
Step 4:Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract.
Step 5:Recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation.
The guidanceIdentify the performance obligations
Determine the transaction price
Allocate the transaction price
Recognize revenue when the performance obligations are met

We recognize revenue when the performance obligations specified in our contracts have been satisfied, after considering the impact of variable consideration and other factors that may affect the transaction price. Our contracts normally contain a single performance obligation that is effective for annual periods beginningfulfilled on or after December 15, 2016 and interim periods within that reporting period. Early adoption is not permitted. These provisionsthe date of this guidance are still being evaluated. The impactdelivery based on CTS' financial statements has not yet been determined.
Subsequent Events: CTS has evaluated subsequent events and transactions for potential recognition or disclosureshipping terms stipulated in the financial statements throughcontract. We usually expect payment within 30 to 90 days from the shipping date, depending on our terms with the financial statementscustomer. None of our contracts as of December 31, 2018, contained a significant financing component. Differences between the amount of revenue recognized and the amount invoiced, collected from, or paid to our customers are issued.recognized as contract assets or liabilities. Contract assets will be reviewed for impairment when events or circumstances indicate that they may not be recoverable.

To the extent the transaction price includes variable consideration, we estimate the amount of variable consideration that should be included in the transaction price utilizing the most likely amount method based on an analysis of historical experience and current facts and circumstances, which requires significant judgment. Variable consideration is included in the transaction price if, in our judgment, it is probable that a significant future reversal of cumulative revenue under the contract will not occur.

Contract Assets and Liabilities

Contract assets and liabilities included in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets are as follows:
 As of
 December 31, December 31,
 2018 2017
Contract Assets


Prepaid rebates included in Other current assets$65

$52
Prepaid rebates included in Other assets999

465
Total Contract Assets$1,064

$517




Contract Liabilities


Customer discounts and price concessions included in Accrued liabilities$(1,656)
$(1,133)
Customer rights of return included in Accrued liabilities(325)
(462)
Total Contract Liabilities$(1,981)
$(1,595)

During the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2018, we recognized a decrease of revenues of $46 and an increase of $22, respectively, that were included in contract liabilities at the beginning of the period.


The increase in contract liabilities as of December 31, 2018 is primarily due to net increases in estimated future discounts and price concessions, offset by net settlements of products sold with rights of return.

Disaggregated Revenue

The following table presents revenues disaggregated by the major markets we serve:

 Three Months Ended Twelve Months Ended
 December 31, 2018 December 31, 2017 December 31, 2018 December 31, 2017
Transportation$76,729
 $71,566
 $300,124
 $275,251
Industrial21,164
 19,537
 86,968
 74,605
Medical11,370
 10,474
 40,663
 35,264
Aerospace & Defense6,504
 4,978
 23,323
 18,813
Telecom & IT4,306
 4,355
 19,405
 19,060
Total$120,073

$110,910

$470,483

$422,993

NOTE 23 — Accounts Receivable
The components of accounts receivable are as follows:
As ofAs of December 31,
December 31, 2015December 31, 201420182017
Accounts receivable, gross$54,696
$56,994
$79,902
$70,941
Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts(133)(100)(384)(357)
Accounts receivable, net$54,563
$56,894
$79,518
$70,584
NOTE 34 — Inventories
Inventories consist of the following:
As ofAs of December 31,
December 31, 2015December 31, 201420182017
Finished goods$6,972
$11,728
$10,995
$9,203
Work-in-process6,828
7,297
12,129
12,065
Raw materials16,991
15,562
25,746
21,150
Less: Inventory reserves(6,191)(6,700)(5,384)(5,822)
Inventories, net$24,600
$27,887
$43,486
$36,596

CTS CORPORATION 45


NOTE 45 — Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment is comprised of the following:
As ofAs of December 31,
December 31, 2015December 31, 201420182017
Land$2,401
$3,044
$1,136
$1,130
Buildings and improvements65,731
67,269
70,522
64,201
Machinery and equipment191,212
185,999
231,619
223,650
Less: Accumulated depreciation(189,472)(184,898)(203,876)(200,734)
Property, plant and equipment, net$69,872
$71,414
$99,401
$88,247
Depreciation expense recorded in the Consolidated StatementStatements of Earnings (Loss) includes the following:
 201520142013
Continuing operations$12,219
$12,781
$12,322
Discontinued operations

3,162
 For the Years Ended
 201820172016
Depreciation expense$15,697
$14,071
$13,177
NOTE 56 — Retirement Plans
CTS hasWe have a number of noncontributory defined benefit pension plans ("pension plans") covering approximately 6%1% of itsour active employees. Pension plans covering salaried employees provide pension benefits that are based on the employees´ years of service and compensation prior to retirement. Pension Plansplans covering hourly employees generally provide benefits of stated amounts for each year of service.
CTS providesWe also provide post-retirement life insurance benefits for certain retired employees. Domestic employees who were hired prior to 1982 and certain domestic union employees are eligible for life insurance benefits upon retirement. CTS fundsWe fund life insurance benefits through term life insurance policies and intendsintend to continue funding all of the premiums on a pay-as-you-go basis.
CTS recognizesWe recognize the funded status of a benefit plan in its statement of financial position.our consolidated balance sheets. The funded status is measured as the difference between plan assets at fair value and the projected benefit obligation. CTSWe also recognizes,recognize, as a component of other comprehensive income, net of tax, the gains or losses and prior service costs or credits that arise during the period but are not recognized as components of net periodic benefit/cost.
The measurement dates for the pension plans for CTS'our U.S. and non-U.S. locations were December 31, 2018, and 2017.
During 2017, we offered certain former vested employees in our U.S. pension plan a one-time option to receive a lump sum distribution of their benefits from pension plan assets. The pension plan made approximately $23,912 in lump sum payments to settle its obligation to these participants. These settlement payments decreased the projected benefit obligation and plan assets by $23,912, and resulted in a non-cash settlement charge of $13,476 related to unrecognized net actuarial losses that were previously included in accumulated other comprehensive loss. The measurement date of this settlement was December 31, 2015 and 2014.2017.
During 2013, a modification was made to the CTS Corporation Domestic Pension Plans freezing benefits for all salaried and non-bargaining unit hourly participants effective December 31, 2013. We recorded a curtailment charge of $651 for the year ended December 31, 2013 in conjunction with the freeze.
During 2014, CTS approved a plan to terminate the U.K. Limited Retirement Benefits Scheme ("the U.K. Plan"). The pension liability was settled in a purchased annuity. CTS completed the termination of the pension plan by the end of 2015, and a loss on settlement of this pension in the amount of $8,280 was recorded in restructuring and impairment charges in 2015.

46 CTS CORPORATION

Table of Contents

The following table provides a reconciliation of benefit obligation, plan assets, and the funded status of the pension plans for U.S. and non-U.S. locations plan at the measurement dates.
U.S.
Pension Plans
 
Non-U.S.
Pension Plans
U.S.
Pension Plans
 
Non-U.S.
Pension Plans
20152014 2015201420182017 20182017
Accumulated benefit obligation$256,924
$284,365
 $2,247
$16,168
$205,319
$228,934
 $1,936
$2,535
Change in projected benefit obligation: 
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
Projected benefit obligation at January 1$284,365
$264,828
 $16,168
$16,028
$228,934
$247,276
 $3,140
$2,866
Service cost171
192
 63
83


 43
48
Interest cost11,258
12,214
 465
608
7,123
8,273
 42
34
Benefits paid(21,526)(19,021) (691)(1,024)(14,781)(39,177) (669)(210)
Actuarial (gain) loss(17,344)26,152
 (131)1,468
(15,957)12,562
 287
164
Plan settlement

 (12,786)
Foreign exchange impact and other

 (292)(995)
Foreign exchange impact

 (87)238
Projected benefit obligation at December 31$256,924
$284,365
 $2,796
$16,168
$205,319
$228,934
 $2,756
$3,140
Change in plan assets: 
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
Assets at fair value at January 1$314,453
$314,211
 $15,128
$14,867
$284,762
$292,044
 $1,777
$1,523
Actual return on assets(3,723)13,961
 (538)(2,258)(11,757)31,559
 67
17
Company contributions111
5,302
 1,275
4,478
103
336
 300
319
Benefits paid(21,526)(19,021) (691)(1,024)(14,781)(39,177) (669)(210)
Plan settlement

 (13,437)
Foreign exchange impact and other

 (257)(935)
Foreign exchange impact

 (50)128
Assets at fair value at December 31$289,315
$314,453
 $1,480
$15,128
$258,327
$284,762
 $1,425
$1,777
Funded status (plan assets less projected benefit obligations)$32,391
$30,088
 $(1,316)$(1,040)$53,008
$55,828
 $(1,331)$(1,363)
The measurement dates for the other post-retirement life insurance plan waswere December 31, 20152018, and 2014.2017. The following table provides a reconciliation of benefit obligation, plan assets, and the funded status of the other post-retirement life insurance plan at thatthose measurement dates.
Other
Post-Retirement
Benefit Plan
Post-Retirement
Life Insurance Plan
2015201420182017
Accumulated benefit obligation$4,885
$5,194
$4,595
$5,134
Change in projected benefit obligation:

 




Projected benefit obligation at January 1$5,194
$4,916
$5,134
$4,952
Service cost5
4
2
2
Interest cost204
230
156
161
Benefits paid(172)(179)(157)(165)
Actuarial (gain) loss(345)223
Actuarial loss(540)184
Projected benefit obligation at December 31$4,886
$5,194
$4,595
$5,134
Change in plan assets: 
 
 
 
Assets at fair value at January 1$
$
$
$
Actual return on assets



Company contributions172
179
157
165
Benefits paid(172)(179)(157)(165)
Other



Assets at fair value at December 31$
$
$
$
Funded status (plan assets less projected benefit obligations)$(4,886)$(5,194)$(4,595)$(5,134)

CTS CORPORATION 47

Table of Contents

The components of the prepaid (accrued) cost of the domestic and foreign pension plans net are classified in the following lines in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31:
U.S.Pension Plans Non-U.S. Pension PlansU.S.Pension Plans Non-U.S. Pension Plans
20152014 2015201420182017 20182017
Prepaid pension asset$33,779
$31,581
 $
$518
$54,100
$57,050
 $
$
Other accrued liabilities

 

Post-retirement obligations(1,388)(1,493) (1,316)(1,558)
Accrued expenses and other liabilities(100)(100) 

Long-term pension obligations(992)(1,122) (1,331)(1,363)
Net prepaid (accrued) cost$32,391
$30,088
 $(1,316)$(1,040)$53,008
$55,828
 $(1,331)$(1,363)


The components of the accrued cost of the other post-retirement benefitlife insurance plan net are classified in the following lines in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31:
 Other
Post-Retirement
Benefit Plan
 20152014
Other accrued liabilities$(358)$(342)
Other long-term obligations(4,528)(4,852)
Total accrued cost$(4,886)$(5,194)
 Post-Retirement
Life Insurance Plan
 20182017
Accrued expenses and other liabilities$(407)$(418)
Long-term pension obligations(4,188)(4,716)
Total accrued cost$(4,595)$(5,134)
CTS hasWe have also recorded the following amounts to accumulated other comprehensive loss for the U.S. and non-U.S. pension plans, net of tax:
 U.S.Pension Plans Non-U.S. Pension Plans
 Unrecognized
Loss
Prior
Service
Cost
Total Unrecognized
Loss
Balance at January 1, 2014$79,218
$
$79,218
 $4,642
Amortization of retirement benefits, net of tax(3,523)
(3,523) (183)
Settlements and curtailments(106)
(106) 
Net actuarial gain20,605

20,605
 4,290
Foreign exchange impact


 (259)
Balance at January 1, 2015$96,194
$
$96,194
 $8,490
Amortization of retirement benefits, net of tax(2,871)
(2,871) (1,507)
Settlements and curtailments


 (5,355)
Net actuarial gain4,150

4,150
 640
Foreign exchange impact


 (629)
Balance at December 31, 2015$97,473
$
$97,473
 $1,639
 U.S.Pension Plans Non-U.S. Pension Plans
 Unrecognized
Loss
 Unrecognized
Loss
Balance at January 1, 2017$89,763
 $1,743
Amortization of retirement benefits, net of tax(3,685) 10
Settlements(8,585) 
Net actuarial (loss) gain(1,753) 2
Foreign exchange impact
 143
Balance at January 1, 2018$75,740
 $1,898
Amortization of retirement benefits, net of tax(4,538) (126)
Settlements19,083
 
Net actuarial (loss) gain(12,351) 196
Foreign exchange impact
 (52)
Tax impact due to implementation of ASU 2018-0217,560
 
Balance at December 31, 2018$95,494
 $1,916

CTS has alsoWe have recorded the following amounts to accumulated other comprehensive loss for otherthe post-retirement benefitlife insurance plan, net of tax:
Unrecognized
(Gain) loss
Unrecognized
Gain
Balance at January 1, 2014$(755)
Balance at January 1, 2017$(560)
Amortization of retirement benefits, net of tax64
Net actuarial gain117
Balance at January 1, 2018$(379)
Amortization of retirement benefits, net of tax98
36
Net actuarial loss140
(418)
Balance at January 1, 2015$(517)
Amortization of retirement benefits, net of tax63
Net actuarial gain(215)
Balance at December 31, 2015$(669)
Tax impact due to implementation of ASU No. 2018-02(88)
Balance at December 31, 2018$(849)


48 CTS CORPORATION

Table of Contents

The accumulated actuarial gaingains and losses and prior service costs and credits included in other comprehensive income are amortized in the following manner: 

The component of unamortized net gains or losses related to our qualified pension plans is amortized based on the expected future life expectancy of the plan participants (estimated to be approximately 2117 years at December 31, 2015)2018), because substantially all of the participants in those plans are inactive.  The component of unamortized net gains or losses related to our other post-employment benefitpost-retirement life insurance plan is amortized based on the estimated remaining future service period of the plan participants (estimated to be approximately 4 years at December 31, 2015)2018).   The Company uses a market-related approach to value of plan assets, approach reflecting changes in the fair value of plan assets over a five-year period.  The variance resulting from the difference between the expected and actual return on plan assets is included in the amortization calculation upon reflection in the market-related value of plan assets.
CTS expectsIn 2019, we expect to recognize on aapproximately $5,270 and $0 of pre-tax basis, approximately $5,994 of losses included in accumulated other comprehensive loss in 2016 related to its Pension Plans. CTS does not expect to recognize any significant amounts of the otherour pension plans and post-retirement benefitlife insurance plan, unrecognized amounts in 2016.Therespectively.

The projected benefit obligation, accumulated benefit obligation and fair value of plan assets for those Pension Plans with accumulated benefit obligation in excess of fair value of plan assets is shown below:
As of December 31,As of December 31,
2015201420182017
Projected benefit obligation$4,184
$4,612
$3,848
$4,361
Accumulated benefit obligation3,635
3,860
$3,028
$3,757
Fair value of plan assets1,480
1,562
$1,426
$1,776
Net pension expense (income) expense includes the following components:
Year Ended
December 31,

Year Ended
December 31,
Years Ended
December 31,

Years Ended
December 31,
U.S. Pension Plans
Non-U.S. Pension PlansU.S. Pension Plans
Non-U.S. Pension Plans
201520142013
201520142013201820172016
201820172016
Service cost$171
$192
$2,435

$63
$83
$110
$
$
$87

$43
$48
$51
Interest cost11,258
12,214
11,046

465
608
536
7,123
8,273
11,024

42
34
46
Expected return on plan assets(1)
(20,272)(20,833)(20,217)
(446)(677)(474)(12,898)(16,243)(18,976)
(25)(20)(26)
Amortization of unrecognized:

 
 



 
 
Prior service cost

498




Loss6,339
5,644
7,245

7,492
231
378
Additional cost due to early retirement
172
692

651


Curtailment loss

651




Net (income)/expense$(2,504)$(2,611)$2,350

$8,225
$245
$550
Amortization of unrecognized loss5,863
5,785
5,994

162
155
140
Settlement loss
13,476





Net expense (income)$88
$11,291
$(1,871)
$222
$217
$211
Weighted-average actuarial assumptions(2)
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
Benefit obligation assumptions: 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
Discount rate4.43%4.07%4.84%
1.63%3.13%3.85%4.30%3.63%4.16%
1.13%1.38%1.13%
Rate of compensation increase%%3.00%
2.00%0.48%0.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%
3.00%2.00%2.00%
Pension income/expense assumptions:

 
 



 




 
 





 
Discount rate4.07%4.84%4.06%
3.13%3.85%3.46%3.63%4.16%4.43%
1.38%1.13%1.63%
Expected return on plan assets(1)
7.00%7.50%7.75%
2.00%4.06%3.10%4.72%5.61%6.63%
1.38%1.13%1.63%
Rate of compensation increase%%3.00%
0.48%0.57%0.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%
2.00%2.00%2.00%
(1)Expected return on plan assets is net of expected investment expenses and certain administrative expenses.
(2)During the fourth quarter of each year, CTS reviews itswe review our actuarial assumptions in light of current economic factors to determine if the assumptions need to be adjusted.

CTS CORPORATION 49

Table of Contents

Net post-retirement expense includes the following components:
Other Post-Retirement
Benefit Plan
Post-Retirement
Life Insurance Plan
Year Ended December 31,Years Ended December 31,
201520142013201820172016
Service cost$5
$4
$7
$2
$2
$3
Interest cost204
230
223
156
161
207
Amortization of unrecognized:

 
 
Gain(101)(158)
Amortization of unrecognized gain(46)(101)(149)
Net expense$108
$76
$230
$112
$62
$61
Weighted-average actuarial assumptions (1)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Benefit obligation assumptions: 
 
 
 
 
 
Discount rate4.43%4.07%4.84%4.26%3.59%4.10%
Rate of compensation increase0%0%0%0%0%0%
Pension income/post-retirement expense assumptions:

 
 




 
Discount rate4.07%4.84%4.06%3.59%4.10%4.43%
Rate of compensation increase0%0%0%0%0%0%
(1)During the fourth quarter of each year, CTS reviews itswe review our actuarial assumptions in light of current economic factors to determine if the assumptions need to be adjusted.
The discount rate utilized to estimate CTS'our pension and post-retirement obligations is based on market conditions at December 31, 2015,2018, and is determined using a model consisting of high quality bond portfolios that match cash flows of the plans' projected benefit payments based on the plan participants' service to date and their expected future compensation. Use of the rate produced

by this model generates a projected benefit obligation that equals the current market value of a portfolio of high quality bonds whose maturity dates match the timing and amount of expected future benefit payments.
The discount rate used to determine 20152018 pension income and post-retirement expense for CTS' pension and post-retirement plans is based on market conditions at December 31, 20142017, and is the interest rate used to estimate interest incurred on the outstanding projected benefit obligations during the period.
CTS utilizesWe utilize a building block approach in determining the long-term rate of return for plan assets. Historical markets are reviewed and long-term relationships between equities and fixed-income are preserved consistent with the generally accepted capital market principle that assets with higher volatility generate a greater return over the long term. Current market factors such as inflation and interest rates are evaluated before long-term capital market assumptions are determined. The long-term portfolio return is established via a building block approach with proper consideration of diversification and rebalancing. Peer data and historical returns are reviewed to ensure for reasonableness and appropriateness.
CTS´Our pension plan asset allocation at December 31, 20152018, and 2014,2017, and target allocation for 20162019 by asset category are as follows:
Target Allocations
Percentage of Plan Assets
at December 31,
Target Allocations Percentage of Plan Assets
at December 31,
Asset Category2016 201520142019 20182017
Equity securities (1)
46%
39%60%13% 12%11%
Debt securities35%
41%25%83% 84%82%
Other19%
20%15%4% 4%7%
Total100%
100%100%100% 100%
(1)Equity securities include CTS common stock in the amounts of approximately $25,000 (9% of total plan assets) at December 31, 2015 and approximately $26,000 (8% of total plan assets) at December 31, 2014.
CTS employs
We employ a total return onliability-driven investment approachstrategy whereby a mix of equitiesequity and fixed-income investments are used to maximizepursue a de-risking strategy which over time seeks to reduce interest rate mismatch risk and other risks while achieving a return that matches or exceeds the long-term return ofgrowth in projected pension plan assets for a prudent level of risk.liabilities.  Risk tolerance is established through careful consideration of plan liabilities and funded status.  The investment portfolio primarily contains a diversified mix of equity and fixed-income investments.  The equity investments are diversified across U.S. and non-U.S. stocks. Other assets such as private equity are used modestly to enhance long-term returns while improving portfolio diversification.

50 CTS CORPORATION

Table of Contents

Investment risk is measured and monitored on an ongoing basis through quarterly investment portfolio reviews, annual liability measurements, and asset/liability studies at regular intervals.
The following table summarizes the fair values of CTS'our pension plan assets:
 As of December 31,
 20152014
Equity securities — U.S. holdings(1)
$56,696
$174,153
Equity securities — non-U.S. holdings(1)
11,028
14,050
Equity funds — International LP(1)

15,636
Equity funds — U.S. LP(1)

13,077
Equity funds - U.S. holdings(1)
17,522

Equity funds — non-U.S. holdings(2)
26,903

Corporate bonds(2)

47,417
Bond funds - government(10)
47,800

Bond funds - other(11)
69,617

Real estate(12)
10,006

Cash and cash equivalents(3)
7,417
5,889
Debt securities issued by U.S., state and local governments(5)

14,484
Partnerships(7)
13,360
11,239
Long/short equity-focused hedge funds(6)
5,255
5,367
International hedge funds(4)
25,191
11,679
Mortgage-backed securities(8)

3,796
Fixed annuity contracts(9)

12,475
Other asset-backed securities
319
Total fair value of plan assets$290,795
$329,581
 As of December 31,
 20182017
Equity securities - U.S. holdings(1)
$20,469
$19,487
Equity securities - non-U.S. holdings(1)

1,131
Equity funds - U.S. holdings(1) (8)
54
1,314
Bond funds - government(5) (8)
19,146
3,126
Bond funds - other(6) (8)
202,393
231,710
Real estate(7) (8)
2,652
1,235
Cash and cash equivalents(2)
5,866
11,145
Partnerships(4)
9,172
10,787
International hedge funds(3)

6,604
Total fair value of plan assets$259,752
$286,539

The fair values at December 31, 20152018, are classified within the following categories in the fair value hierarchy:
 Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets
(Level 1)
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Total
Equity securities — U.S. holdings(1)
$56,696
$
$
$56,696
Equity securities — non-U.S. holdings(1)
11,028


11,028
Equity funds - U.S. holdings(1)

17,522

17,522
Equity funds - non-U.S. holdings(1)

26,903

26,903
Bond funds - government(10)

47,800

47,800
Bond funds - other(11)

69,617

69,617
Real estate(12)

10,006

10,006
Cash and cash equivalents(3)
7,417


7,417
Partnerships(7)


13,360
13,360
Long/short equity-focused hedge funds(6)


5,255
5,255
International hedge funds(4)


25,191
25,191
Total$75,141
$171,848
$43,806
$290,795
 Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets
(Level 1)
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Not LeveledTotal
Equity securities - U.S. holdings(1)
$20,469
$
$
$
$20,469
Equity funds - U.S. holdings(1) (8)



54
54
Bond funds - government(5)



19,146
19,146
Bond funds - other(6) (8)



202,393
202,393
Real estate(7) (8)



2,652
2,652
Cash and cash equivalents(2)
5,866



5,866
Partnerships(4)


9,172

9,172
Total$26,335
$
$9,172
$224,245
$259,752

CTS CORPORATION 51

Table of Contents

The fair values at December 31, 20142017, are classified within the following categories in the fair value hierarchy:
 Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets
(Level 1)
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Total
Equity securities — U.S. holdings(1)
$174,153
$
$
$174,153
Equity securities — non-U.S. holdings(1)
14,048
2

14,050
Equity funds — International LP(1)

15,636

15,636
Equity funds — U.S. LP(1)

13,077

13,077
Corporate Bonds(2)

47,417

47,417
Cash and cash equivalents(3)
5,889


5,889
Debt securities issued by U.S. and U.K., state and local governments(5)

14,484

14,484
Partnerships(7)


11,239
11,239
Long/short equity-focused hedge funds(6)


5,367
5,367
International hedge funds(4)


11,679
11,679
Mortgage-backed securities(8)

3,796

3,796
Fixed annuity contracts(9)


12,475
12,475
Other asset-backed securities
319

319
Total$194,090
$94,731
$40,760
$329,581
 Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets
(Level 1)
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Not LeveledTotal
Equity securities - U.S. holdings(1)
$19,487
$
$
$
$19,487
Equity securities - non-U.S. holdings(1)
1,131



1,131
Equity funds - U.S.holdings(1) (8)



1,314
1,314
Bond funds - government(5) (8)



3,126
3,126
Bond funds - other(6) (8)



231,710
231,710
Real estate(7) (8)



1,235
1,235
Cash and cash equivalents(2)
11,145



11,145
Partnerships(4)


10,787

10,787
International hedge funds(3) (8)



6,604
6,604
Total$31,763
$
$10,787
$243,989
$286,539
(1)Comprised of common stocks of companies in various industries. The Pension Plan fund manager may shift investments from value to growth strategies or vice-versa, from small cap to large cap stocks or vice-versa, in order to meet the Pension Plan's investment objectives, which are to provide for a reasonable amount of long-term growth of capital without undue exposure to volatility, and protect the assets from erosion of purchasing power.
(2)Comprised of investment grade securities of companies in various industries.short-term investment and money-market funds.
(3)Comprised of investment grade short-term investment funds.
(4)This fund allocates its capital across several direct hedge-fundhedge fund organizations. This fund invests with hedge funds that employ "non-directional" strategies. These strategies do not require the direction of the markets to generate returns. The majority of these hedge funds generate returns by the occurrence of key events such as bankruptcies, mergers, spin-offs, etc. Investments can be redeemed at the share Net Asset Value ("NAV") as of the last business day of each calendar quarter with at least a sixty-five day prior written notice to the administrator.
(5)Comprised of investment grade securities that are backed by the U.S., state or local governments.
(6)The hedge fund manager utilizes fundamental research and invests in equities both long (seeking price appreciation) and short (expectation that the stock will fall) instruments.
(7)(4)Comprised of partnerships that invest in various U.S. and international industries.
(8)(5)Comprised of investment grade securities in which approximately $0long-term government bonds with a minimum maturity of 10 years and $941 are backed by the U.S. government for the years ended December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively, and the remainder by commercial real estate.
(9)Comprised of fixed annuity contracts purchased at market value when plan participants retire.
(10)Comprised of zero-coupon U.S. Treasury securities (“("Treasury STRIPS”Strips") with maturities greater than 20 years.
(11)(6)Comprised predominately of investment grade U.S. corporate bonds with maturities greater than 10 years and U.S. high-yield corporate bonds; emerging market debt (local currency sovereign bonds, U.S. dollar-denominated sovereign bonds and U.S. dollar-denominated corporate bonds); and U.S. bank loans.
(12)(7)Comprised of investments in securities of U.S. and non-U.S. real estate investment trusts (REITs), real estate operating companies and other companies that are principally engaged in the real estate industry and of investments in global private direct commercial real estate. Investments can be redeemed immediately following the valuation date with a notice of at least fifteen business days before valuation.
(8)Comprised of investments that are measured at fair value using the NAV per share practical expedient. In accordance with the provisions of ASC 820-10, these investments have not been classified in the fair value hierarchy. The fair value amount not leveled is presented to allow reconciliation of the fair value hierarchy to total fund pension plan assets.
The pension plan assets recorded at fair value are measured and classified in a hierarchy for disclosure purposes consisting of three levels based on the observability of inputs available in the marketplace used to measure fair value as discussed below:
Level 1:  Fair value measurements that are based on quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets that the pension plan trustees have the ability to access for identical assets or liabilities. Market price data generally is obtained from exchange or dealer markets.
Level 2:  Fair value measurements based on inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets in active or inactive markets, and inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset, such as interest rates and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals. Certain of our pension assets valued by Level 2 inputs are comprised of partnership investments which are not exchange traded and are valued at their Net Asset Values ("NAV") which are considered observable inputs.
Level 3:  Fair value measurements based on valuation techniques that use significant inputs that are unobservable.

52 CTS CORPORATION


The table below reconciles the Level 3 international hedge fund assets within the fair value hierarchy:
 Amount
Fair value of Level 3 hedge fund assets at December 31, 2013$10,958
Capital contributions
Realized and unrealized gain721
Fair value of Level 3 hedge fund assets at December 31, 2014$11,679
Capital contributions12,700
Realized and unrealized gain812
Fair value of Level 3 hedge fund assets at December 31, 2015$25,191
The table below reconciles the Level 3 long/short equity-focused hedge fund assets within the fair value hierarchy:
 Amount
Fair value of Level 3 hedge fund assets at December 31, 2013$11,147
Capital contributions
Capital distributions(6,178)
Realized and unrealized gain398
Fair value of Level 3 hedge fund assets at December 31, 2014$5,367
Capital contributions
Capital distributions(180)
Realized and unrealized gain68
Fair value of Level 3 hedge fund assets at December 31, 2015$5,255
The hedge fund manager reviews the net asset values of the underlying portfolio of hedge funds and also the hedge fund positions within the portfolio. If the positions cannot be exited within one year these funds are considered level 3 investments within the fair value hierarchy.
The table below reconciles the Level 3 partnership assets within the fair value hierarchy:
AmountAmount
Fair value of Level 3 partnership assets at January 1, 2014$9,010
Fair value of Level 3 partnership assets at January 1, 2017$12,862
Capital contributions2,570
343
Net ordinary gain attributable to partnership assets
Realized and unrealized gain1,733
2,107
Capital distributions(2,074)(4,525)
Fair value of Level 3 partnership assets at December 31, 201411,239
Fair value of Level 3 partnership assets at December 31, 201710,787
Capital contributions2,808
78
Net ordinary gain attributable to partnership assets
Realized and unrealized gain754
1,154
Capital distributions(1,441)(2,847)
Fair value of Level 3 partnership assets at December 31, 2015$13,360
Fair value of Level 3 partnership assets at December 31, 2018$9,172
The partnership fund manager uses a market approach in estimating the fair value of the plan's Level 3 asset. The market approach estimates fair value by first determining the entity's earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization and then multiplying that value by an estimated multiple. When establishing an appropriate multiple, the fund manager considers recent comparable private company transactions and multiples paid. The entity's net debt is then subtracted from the calculated amount to arrive at an estimated fair value for the entity. The fund manager's goal is to provide a conservative estimate of the fair value of such assets and to utilize conservative estimates of multiples used in establishing such fair values.
The fixed annuity contracts were purchased at market value when plan participants retire in order to provide these participants with the pension benefits under the rules of the pension plan. Once purchased, these annuities have no tradable value. Fair value has instead been assessed as the present value, using certain actuarial assumptions, of the stream of expected payments. Accordingly, these fixed annuities are classified as Level 3 under the fair value hierarchy.

CTS CORPORATION 53

Table of Contents

The table below reconciles the Level 3 fixed annuity contracts within the fair value hierarchy:
 Amount
Fair value of Level 3 fixed annuity contracts at January 1, 2014$1,620
Purchases11,530
Benefits paid(117)
Net loss(558)
Fair value of Level 3 fixed annuity contracts at December 31, 201412,475
Purchases
Assets transferred due to termination of plan(12,475)
Net loss
Fair value of Level 3 fixed annuity contracts at December 31, 2015$
CTS expectsWe expect to make $102$100 of contributions to the U.S. plans and $331$271 of contributions to the non-U.S. plans during 2016.

2019.
The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid:
 U.S.
Pension
Plans
Non-U.S.
Pension
Plans
Other
Post-Retirement
Benefit Plan
2016$16,326
$78
$358
201716,637
9
351
201816,638
102
344
201916,780
104
336
202016,915
239
327
2021-202583,978
717
1,497
Total$167,274
$1,249
$3,213
 U.S.
Pension
Plans
Non-U.S.
Pension
Plans
Post-Retirement
Life Insurance Plan
2019$15,537
$52
$407
202015,519
57
393
202115,409
66
379
202215,226
91
365
202314,988
82
351
2024-202770,462
658
1,551
Total$147,141
$1,006
$3,446
Defined Contribution Plans
CTS sponsorsWe sponsor a 401(k) plan that covers substantially all of itsour U.S. employees. Contributions and costs are generally determined as a percentage of the covered employee's annual salary.
Expenses related to defined contribution plans include the following:
 Year Ended December 31,
 201520142013
401(k) and other plan expense$3,352
$3,719
$4,651
 Years Ended December 31,
 201820172016
401(k) and other plan expense$3,256
$3,141
$2,841

54 CTS CORPORATION


NOTE 67 — Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
We evaluate finite-lived intangible assets for impairment if indicators of impairment exist. No indicators were identified for the years ended December 31, 2018, or December 31, 2017.
Other intangible assets consist of the following:
December 31, 2015As of December 31, 2018  
Gross
Carrying
Amount
Accumulated
Amortization
Net
Amount
Gross
Carrying
Amount
Accumulated
Amortization
Net
Amount
 Weighted Average Remaining Amortization Period (in years)
Other intangible assets: 
 
 
 
 
 
  
Customer lists / relationships$51,804
$(27,101)$24,703
$64,323
$(37,088)$27,235
 9.6
Patents10,319
(10,319)
Technology and other intangibles12,871
(5,016)7,855
44,460
(13,715)30,745
 10.1
In process research and development2,200

2,200
2,200

2,200
 
Other intangible assets, net$77,194
$(42,436)$34,758
$110,983
$(50,803)$60,180
 9.8
Amortization expense for the year ended December 31, 2015 
$4,035
 
Amortization expense for the year ended December 31, 2018 
$6,817
 
  

Amortization expense remaining for other intangible assets is as follows:
Amortization
expense
Amortization
expense
2016$3,724
20173,624
20183,540
20193,532
$6,754
20203,532
6,624
20216,467
20226,230
20234,225
Thereafter16,806
29,880
Total future amortization expense$34,758
$60,180

December 31, 2014As of December 31, 2017
Gross
Carrying
Amount
Accumulated
Amortization
Net
Amount
Gross
Carrying
Amount
Accumulated
Amortization
Net
Amount
Other intangible assets: 
 
 
 
 
 
Customer lists / relationships$51,804
$(24,415)$27,389
$64,323
$(33,685)$30,638
Patents10,319
(10,319)
10,319
(10,319)
Technology and other intangibles12,270
(3,757)8,513
44,460
(10,355)34,105
In process research and development690

690
2,200

2,200
Other intangible assets, net$75,083
$(38,491)$36,592
$121,302
$(54,359)$66,943
Amortization expense for the year ended December 31, 2014 
$4,190
 
Amortization expense for the year ended December 31, 2013 
$5,002
 
Amortization expense for the year ended December 31, 2017 
$6,603
 
Amortization expense for the year ended December 31, 2016 
$5,815
 
In 2018, a goodwill impairment test was performed by management with the assistance of a third-party valuation firm. As of December 31, 2018, it was concluded that the fair value of each of our reporting units exceeded their carrying values, and accordingly, no goodwill impairment was required.
Changes in the net carrying value amount of goodwill were as follows:
 Total
Goodwill as of December 31, 2013$32,047
Impairment charge
Goodwill as of December 31, 201432,047
Increase from acquisition1,818
Goodwill as of December 31, 2015$33,865

 Total
Goodwill as of December 31, 2016$61,744
Increase from acquisitions9,313
Goodwill as of December 31, 201771,057
Increase from acquisition
Goodwill as of December 31, 2018$71,057



CTS CORPORATION 55

Table of Contents

NOTE 78 — Costs Associated with Exit and Restructuring Activities
Restructuring and impairment charges are reported as a separate line within operating earnings in the Consolidated StatementStatements of Earnings (Loss). Restructuring-related charges are recorded as a component of cost of goods sold.Earnings. Total restructuring impairment and restructuring-related charges were $15,195 in 2015, $7,876 in 2014 and $11,700 in 2013 .
Restructuring and impairment charges were $14,564, $5,941were:
 Years Ended December 31,
 201820172016
Restructuring and impairment charges5,062
4,139
3,048
In June 2016, we announced plans to restructure operations by phasing out production at our Elkhart, IN facility and $10,455 fortransitioning it into a research and development center supporting our global operations ("June 2016 Plan"). Additional organizational changes will also occur in various other locations. In 2017, we amended this plan to include costs related to the relocation of our corporate headquarters and Bolingbrook, Illinois manufacturing operations. The cost of the plan, which is expected to be completed in mid 2019, is estimated to be approximately $13,400 and impacts approximately 230 employees. Additional costs related to line movements, equipment charges, and other costs will be expensed as incurred. The total restructuring liability related to the June 2016 Plan was $668 at December 31, 2018.

The following table displays the planned restructuring and impairment charges associated with the June 2016 Plan as well as a summary of the actual costs incurred through December 31, 2018:
June 2016 PlanPlanned Costs Actual costs
incurred through
December 31,
2018
Workforce reduction$3,075
 $2,975
Building and equipment relocation9,025
 7,807
Other charges1,300
 964
Restructuring and impairment charges$13,400
 $11,746

During the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014,2018 and 2013, respectively. Restructuring-related2017, total restructuring and impairment charges were $631, $1,935and $1,245 for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.June 2016 Plan were as follows:
 Years Ended December 31,

2018 2017 2016
Restructuring and impairment charges$4,559
 $4,139
 $3,048
During April 2014, CTSwe announced plans to restructure itsour operations and consolidate itsour Canadian operations into other existing CTS facilities as part of CTS'our overall plan to simplify itsour business model and rationalize itsour global footprint ("April 2014 Plan").
During the second quarter of 2015, CTS management revised the April 2014 Plan. The amendment added an additional $4,250 in planned costs. Additional administrative and legal costs are estimated to account for $1,300 of additional restructuring and impairment charges due to the extension of the timing of the plant shutdown. The remaining $2,950 in restructuring related charges are for additional costs related to equipment relocation, training, travel and shipping costs to facilitate an effective transition.

These restructuring actions, which were substantially completed during 2015, resulted in the elimination of approximately 120 positions.

The following table displays the planned restructuring and restructuring-related charges associated with the April 2014 Plan, as well as a summary of the actual costs incurred through December 31, 2015:2018:
April 2014 PlanPlanned
Costs
Actual costs
incurred through
December 31,
2015
Planned
Costs
Actual costs
incurred through
December 31,
2018
Inventory write-down$850
$
$850
$
Equipment relocation1,800
444
1,800
444
Other charges1,400
113
1,400
113
Restructuring-related charges, included in cost of goods sold$4,050
$557
4,050
557
Workforce reduction$4,200
$4,423
4,200
4,423
Other charges, including pension termination costs1,700
3,413
1,700
3,916
Restructuring and impairment charges$5,900
$7,836
5,900
8,339
Total restructuring, impairment and restructuring-related charges$9,950
$8,393
$9,950
$8,896
UnderRestructuring charges under the April 2014 Plan restructuring, impairment,were $503, $0, and restructuring-related charges were $4,923 for the year ended December 31, 2015. Restructuring, impairment, and restructuring-related charges were $3,470 for the year ended December 31, 2014.
During June 2013, CTS announced a restructuring plan to simplify CTS' global footprint by consolidating manufacturing facilities into existing locations. This Plan included (1) the consolidation of operations from the U.K. manufacturing facility into the Czech Republic facility, (2) the consolidation of operations from the Carol Stream, Illinois manufacturing facility into the Juarez, Mexico facility, and (3) the discontinuation of manufacturing at our Singapore facility. Certain Corporate functions were consolidated or eliminated as a result of the June 2013 Plan and also as a result of the sale of CTS' EMS business. These restructuring actions called for the elimination of approximately 350 positions.
During the fourth quarter of 2014, CTS management revised the June 2013 Plan. The amendment added an additional $4,000 in planned costs. Settlement of the U.K. pension plan was estimated to account for $2,000 of the added cost. The remaining $2,000 in restructuring and impairment charges were for severance costs that were estimated to result in the elimination of approximately 130 additional positions. The positions eliminated were spread globally throughout CTS businesses.

56 CTS CORPORATION

Table of Contents

The following table displays the planned restructuring and restructuring-related charges associated with the June 2013 Plan, as well as a summary of the actual costs incurred through December 31, 2015:
June 2013 PlanPlanned
Costs
Actual costs
incurred through
December 31,
2015
Inventory write-down$800
$1,143
Equipment relocation900
1,792
Other charges100
702
Restructuring-related charges, included in cost of goods sold$1,800
$3,637
Workforce reduction$10,150
$9,615
Asset impairment charge3,000
4,139
Other charges, including pension termination costs7,650
10,205
Restructuring and impairment charges$20,800
$23,959
Total restructuring and restructuring-related charges$22,600
$27,596
Under the June 2013 Plan, total restructuring, impairment and restructuring-related charges incurred were $10,272, $4,406, and $11,508 forduring the years ended December 31, 2015,2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. The total restructuring liability related to the April 2014 and 2013, respectively. For the year endedPlan was $918 at December 31, 2015, the restructuring-related charges were $125 and the restructuring and impairment charges were $10,147. For the year ended December 31, 2014, the restructuring-related charges was $1,935 and the restructuring and impairment charges were $2,471. For the year ended December 31, 2013, the restructuring-related charges were $1,053 and the restructuring and impairment charges were $10,455.2018.


The following table displays the restructuring liability activity for the period ended December 31, 2015:
June 2013 Plan and April 2014 PlanRestructuring Liability
Restructuring liability at January 1, 2015$3,904
Restructuring and restructuring-related charges15,195
Cost paid(18,273)
Restructuring liability at December 31, 2015$826
During December of 2012, CTS realigned its operations to suit its business needs ("December 2012 Plan"). These realignment actions resulted in the elimination of approximately 190 positions. These actions were completed as of March 31, 2013. Under the December 2012 Plan, total restructuring, impairment and restructuring-related charges incurred were $264 for the year ended December 31, 2013.2018:
April 2014 Plan and June 2016 PlanRestructuring Liability
Restructuring liability at January 1, 2018$1,913
Restructuring charges5,062
Cost paid(5,465)
Other activities (1)
76
Restructuring liability at December 31, 2018$1,586
(1) Other activities includes currency translation adjustments not recorded through restructuring expense.
The total liability of $1,586 is included in Accrued expenses and other liabilities at December 31, 2018.
NOTE 89 — Accrued Expenses and Other Liabilities
The components of accrued expenses and other liabilities are as follows:
As ofAs of December 31,
December 31, 2015December 31, 201420182017
Accrued product related costs$5,245
$5,216
Accrued product-related costs$4,377
$5,297
Accrued income taxes8,845
3,346
6,914
5,475
Accrued property and other taxes1,838
2,547
1,976
997
Accrued professional fees3,350
2,228
Contract liabilities1,981
1,595
Dividends payable1,302
1,336
1,310
1,318
Remediation reserves20,603
3,918
11,274
17,067
Deferred income tax6,731
9
Other accrued liabilities9,341
8,984
6,165
7,367
Total accrued expenses and other liabilities$53,905
$25,356
$37,347
$41,344

CTS CORPORATION 57

Table of Contents

NOTE 910 — Contingencies
Certain processes in the manufacture of CTS'our current and past products create by-products classified as hazardous waste by-products as currently defined by federal and state laws and regulations. CTS haswaste. We have been notified by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, state environmental agencies, and in some cases, generator groups that it is or may be aof potentially responsible party regarding hazardous substancesparties, that we are potentially liable for environmental contamination at several sites either owned, notcurrently and formerly owned or operated by CTS. Some sites, are Superfund sites such as in Asheville, North Carolina and Mountain View, California. CTS reservesCalifornia, are designated National Priorities List Superfund sites under the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Superfund program. We reserve for probable remediation activities at these sites and for claims and proceedings against CTS with respect to other environmental matters. CTS recordsWe record reserves on aan undiscounted basis. In the opinion of management, based upon presently available information relating to all such matters, adequate provision for probable and estimable costs have been recorded. We do not have any known environmental obligations where a loss is probable or reasonably possible of occurring for which we do not have a reserve, nor do we have any amounts for which we have not reserved because the amount of the loss cannot be reasonably estimated. Due to the inherent nature of environmental obligations, CTSwe cannot provide assurance that itsour ultimate environmental investigation and clean-up costs and liabilitiesliability will not materially exceed the amount of itsour current reserve. Our reserve and disclosures will be adjusted accordingly if additional information becomes available in the future.
A roll forwardroll-forward of remediation reserves on the balance sheet is comprised of the following:
Year Ended December 31,Years Ended December 31,
20152014201820172016
Balance at beginning of period$3,918
$5,116
$17,067
$18,176
$20,603
Remediation expense18,591
1,521
1,182
307
556
Remediation payments(1,906)(2,719)(6,967)(1,416)(2,983)
Other activity (1)
(8)

Balance at end of the period$20,603
$3,918
$11,274
$17,067
$18,176
(1) Other activity includes currency translation adjustments not recorded through remediation expense 


Unrelated to the environmental claims described above, certain other legal claims are pending against CTSus with respect to matters arising out of the ordinary conduct of CTS’our business. Although the ultimate outcome of any potential litigation resulting from these claims cannot be predicted with certainty, and some may be disposed of unfavorably to CTS, management believes that adequate provision for anticipated costs have been established based upon all presently available information. Except as noted herein, we do not believe we have any pending loss contingencies that are probable or reasonably possible of having a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

NOTE 1011 — Leases
Minimum future obligations under all non-cancelable operating leases as of December 31, 20152018, are as follows:
Operating
Leases
Operating
Leases
2016$3,370
20172,973
20182,175
20191,886
$3,859
20201,408
3,622
20212,587
20222,411
20232,464
Thereafter1,147
16,086
Total minimum lease obligations$12,959
$31,029
Rent expense for operating leases charged to operations was as follows :follows:
 Year Ended December 31,
 201520142013
Rent expense$3,550
$4,300
$3,936
 Years Ended December 31,
 201820172016
Rent expense$5,726
$4,762
$5,694
Operating leases include a variety of properties around the world. These properties are used as manufacturing facilities, distribution centers and sales and administrative offices. Lease expirations range from 20162018 to 20262033 with breaking periods specified in the lease agreements. Sublease income was $474$455 in 2015.2018. Future sublease income is $468$444 in 20162019, $423 in 2020, and $468 in 2017.$846 thereafter. Some of CTS'our operating leases include renewal options and escalation clauses.

58 CTS CORPORATION

Table of Contents

In the fourth quarter of 2012, one of CTS' foreign locations entered into a sale-leaseback transaction. As a result of this transaction, a deferred gain of approximately $4,500 was being amortized over the 6 year expected lease term. During 2015, CTS terminated the lease and recognized the remaining unamortized deferred gain into income. A gain of $2,108 was included in continuing operations in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings (Loss) for the year ended December 31, 2015.
NOTE 1112 — Debt
Long-term debt was comprised of the following:
As ofAs of December 31
December 31, 2015December 31, 201420182017
Revolving credit facility due in 2020$90,700
$75,000
Total credit facility$300,000
$300,000
Balance outstanding$50,000
$76,300
Standby letters of credit$1,940
$2,065
Amount available$248,060
$221,635
Weighted-average interest rate1.5%1.5%3.10%2.30%
Amount available$106,985
$122,535
Total credit facility$200,000
$200,000
Standby letters of credit$2,315
$2,465
Commitment fee percentage per annum0.25%0.25%0.20%0.25%
TheOur revolving credit facility requires, among other things, that CTSwe comply with a maximum total leverage ratio and a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio. Failure of CTS to comply with these covenants could reduce the borrowing availability under the revolving credit facility. CTS wasWe were in compliance with all debt covenants as of December 31, 2015.2018. The revolving credit facility requires CTSus to deliver quarterly financial statements, annual financial statements, auditors certifications and compliance certificates within a specified number of days after the end of a quarter and year. Additionally, the revolving credit facility contains restrictions limiting CTS'our ability to dispose of assets; incur certain additional debt; repay other debt or amend subordinated debt instruments; create liens on assets; make investments, loans or advances; make acquisitions or engage in mergers or consolidations; engage in certain transactions with CTS'our subsidiaries and affiliates; and make stock repurchases and dividend payments. Interest rates on the revolving credit facility fluctuate based upon the London Interbank Offered Rate and the Company's quarterly total leverage ratio. CTS paysWe pay a commitment fee on the undrawn portion of the revolving credit facility. The commitment fee varies based on the quarterly leverage ratio.
CTS has
We have debt issuance costs related to itsour long-term debt that are being amortized using the straight-line method over the life of the debt. Amortization expense was approximately $175$185 in 20152018 and $2002017, and $163 in 2014 and 2013,2016, and was recognized as interest expense.
CTS usesWe use interest rate swaps to convert the line of credit'srevolving credit facility's variable rate of interest into a fixed rate on a portion of the debt.debt as described more fully in Note 13 "Derivatives". These swaps are treated as cash flow hedges and consequently, the changes in fair value were recorded in other comprehensive earnings.
Interest rate swaps activity recorded in other comprehensive earnings before tax included the following:
 Years Ended December 31,
 201820172016
Unrealized (loss) gain$(394)$(255)$593
Realized gain reclassified to interest expense$421
$37
$928

NOTE 13 — Derivatives
Our earnings and cash flows are subject to fluctuations due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates. We selectively use derivative financial instruments including foreign currency forward contracts and interest rate swaps to manage our exposure to these risks.
The use of derivative financial instruments exposes the Company to credit risk, which relates to the risk of nonperformance by a counterparty to the derivative contracts. We manage our credit risk by entering into derivative contracts with only highly rated financial institutions and by using netting agreements.
The effective portion of derivative gains and losses are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income until the hedged transaction affects earnings upon settlement, at which time they are reclassified to interest expense, cost of goods sold, or net sales. If it is probable that an anticipated hedged transaction will not occur by the end of the originally specified time period, we reclassify the gains or losses related to that hedge from accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income to other income (expense).
On April 1, 2018, the company adopted the provisions of ASU No. 2017-12 "Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Target Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities". As a result, hedge effectiveness was reviewed qualitatively by verifying that the critical terms of the hedging instrument and the forecasted transaction continue to match, and that there have been no adverse developments that have increased the risk that the counterparty will default. No recognition of ineffectiveness was recorded in our Consolidated Statement of Earnings as a result of this qualitative analysis for the year ended December 31, 2018.
Foreign Currency Hedges
In January of 2016, we began using forward contracts to mitigate currency risk related to a portion of our forecasted foreign Euro denominated revenues and Mexican Peso denominated expenses. The currency forward contracts are designed as cash flow hedges and are recorded in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value.
As of December 31, 2018, we were hedging a portion of our forecasted Peso expenses for the following twelve months. We continue to monitor the Company’s overall currency exposure and may elect to add cash flow hedges in the future. At December 31, 2018, we had a net unrealized loss of $371 in accumulated other comprehensive loss, of which $318 is expected to be reclassified to income within the next 12 months. The notional amount of foreign currency forward contracts outstanding was $15,700 at December 31, 2018.
Interest Rate Swaps
We use interest rate swaps to convert the revolving credit facility’s variable rate of interest into a fixed rate on a portion of our debt balance. In the second quarter of 2012, CTSwe entered into four separate one-year interest rate swap agreements to fix interest rates on $50,000 of long-term debt for the periods January 2013 to January 2017. In the third quarter of 2012, CTSwe entered into four separateadditional one-year interest rate swap agreements to fix interest rates on $25,000 of long-term debt for the periods January 2013 to January 2017. In the third quarter of 2016, we entered into three additional one-year interest rate swap agreements to fix interest rates on $50,000 of long-term debt for the periods August 2017 to August 2020. The difference to be paid or received under the terms of the swap agreements iswill be recognized as an adjustment to interest expense for the related line of credit when settled.
These swaps are treated as cash flow hedges and consequently, the changes in fair value were recorded in other comprehensive earnings. Interest rate swaps activity recordedincome (loss). The estimated net amount of the existing gains or losses that are reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) that is expected to be reclassified into earnings before tax includedwithin the following:next twelve months is approximately $576. 

The location and fair values of derivative instruments designated as hedging instruments in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2018, are shown in the following table:
 For the Year Ended December 31,
 201520142013
Unrealized (loss) gain$(516)$(510)$289
Realized gain reclassified to interest expense$768
$488
$319
 As of December 31,

2018 2017
Foreign currency hedges reported in Accrued expenses and other liabilities$
 $742
Foreign currency hedges reported in Other current assets$393
 $
Interest rate swaps reported in Other current assets$576
 $278
Interest rate swaps reported in Other assets$369
 $693
The Company has elected to net its foreign currency derivative assets and liabilities in the balance sheet in accordance with ASC 210-20 (Balance Sheet, Offsetting). On a gross basis, there were $423 foreign currency derivative assets and foreign currency derivative liabilities were $30.
The effect of derivative instruments on the Consolidated Statements of Earnings is as follows:
 Years Ended December 31,

2018 2017 2016
Foreign Exchange Contracts:
 
  
Amounts reclassified from AOCI to earnings:
 
  
Net sales$383
 $(488) $(124)
Cost of goods sold(6) 497
 111
Selling, general and administrative107
 45
 1
Total amounts reclassified from AOCI to earnings484
 54
 (12)
Loss recognized in other expense for hedge ineffectiveness
 (1) (1)
Loss recognized in other expense for derivatives not designated as cash flow hedges
 (15) (5)
Total derivative gain (loss) on foreign exchange contracts recognized in earnings$484
 $38
 $(18)


 
  
Interest Rate Swaps:
 
  
Interest Expense$(421) $(37) $(928)
Total income (loss) on derivatives recognized in earnings$63
 $1
 $(946)




CTS CORPORATION 59

Table of Contents

Interest rate swaps included on the balance sheets are comprised of the following:
 As of

December 31, 2015December 31, 2014
Accrued liabilities$791
$640
Other long-term obligations$(23)$380
NOTE 1214 — Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
Shareholders' equity includes certain items classified as accumulated other comprehensive loss ("AOCI") in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, including:
Unrealized gains (losses) on hedges relate to interest rate swaps to convert the line of credit'srevolving credit facility's variable rate of interest into a fixed rate.rate and foreign currency forward contracts used to hedge our exposure to changes in exchange rates affecting certain revenues and costs denominated in foreign currencies. These hedges are designated as cash flow hedges, and CTS haswe have deferred income statement recognition of gains and losses until the hedged transaction is settled. Amounts reclassified to income from AOCI for hedges are included in interest expense.expense, cost of sales, or net sales. Further information related to CTS'our interest rate swaps and foreign currency hedges is included in NOTE 15, "Fair Value Measurements"Note 13, "Derivatives".
Unrealized gains (losses) on pension obligations are deferred from income statement recognition until the gains or losses are realized. Amounts reclassified to income from AOCI are included in net periodic pension expense. Further information related to CTS'our pension obligations is included in NOTE 5,Note 6, "Retirement Plans".
Cumulative translation adjustment relates to our non-U.S. subsidiaries that have designated a functional currency other than the U.S. dollar. CTS isWe are required to translate the subsidiary functional currency financial statements to dollars using a combination of historical, period-end, and average foreign exchange rates. This combination of rates creates the foreign currency translation adjustment component of other comprehensive income. Transfer of foreign currency translation gains and (losses)losses from AOCI to income are included in other income (expense) income.in our Consolidated Statements of Earnings.


In 2018, CTS adopted the provision of ASU No. 2018-02 "Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income". This ASU allows for the reclassification from AOCI to retained earnings for the stranded tax effects resulting from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act that was enacted in December 2017. The total impact due to adoption of this standard was an increase in retained earnings of $17,433.
The components of AOCI for 20152018 are as follows:
As of December 31, 2014Gain (Loss)
Recognized
in OCI
Gain (Loss)
reclassified
from AOCI
to income
As of December 31, 2015As of December 31, 2017Gain (Loss)
Recognized
in OCI
Gain (Loss)
reclassified
from AOCI
to income
Impact of ASU No. 2018-02As of December 31, 2018
Changes in fair market value of hedges: 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 
Gross$(1,020)$(516)$768
$(768)$289
$1,932
$(905)$
$1,316
Income tax expense (benefit)384
194
(289)289
Income tax (expense) benefit(105)(437)205
39
(298)
Net(636)(322)479
(479)184
1,495
(700)39
1,018
Changes in unrealized pension cost: 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 
Gross(169,291)
7,572
(161,719)(130,096)
(2,358)
(132,454)
Income tax expense (benefit)65,124

(763)64,361
Income tax benefit (expense)52,837

528
(17,472)35,893
Net(104,167)
6,809
(97,358)(77,259)
(1,830)(17,472)(96,561)
Cumulative translation adjustment: 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 
Gross245
(1,524)
(1,279)(1,985)(306)

(2,291)
Income tax expense (benefit)325
(214)
111
Income tax benefit (expense)100
(5)

95
Net570
(1,738)
(1,168)(1,885)(311)

(2,196)
Total accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income$(104,233)$(2,060)$7,288
$(99,005)$(78,960)$1,184
$(2,530)$(17,433)$(97,739)




60 CTS CORPORATION

Table of Contents

The components of AOCI for 20142017 are as follows:
As of December 31, 2013(Loss) Gain
recognized
in OCI
Gain (Loss)
reclassified
from AOCI
to income
As of December 31, 2014As of December 31, 2016(Loss) Gain
recognized
in OCI
Gain (Loss)
reclassified
from AOCI
to income
As of December 31, 2017
Changes in fair market value of hedges: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gross$(998)$(510)$488
$(1,020)$116
$264
$(91)$289
Income tax expense (benefit)402
167
(185)384
Income tax (expense) benefit(42)(96)33
(105)
Net(596)(343)303
(636)74
168
(58)184
Changes in unrealized pension cost: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gross(138,133)(37,043)5,885
(169,291)(151,618)
21,522
(130,096)
Income tax expense (benefit)55,028
12,267
(2,171)65,124
Income tax benefit (expense)60,672

(7,835)52,837
Net(83,105)(24,776)3,714
(104,167)(90,946)
13,687
(77,259)
Cumulative translation adjustment: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gross949
(704)
245
(2,414)429

(1,985)
Income tax expense (benefit)855
(530)
325
Income tax benefit92
8

100
Net1,804
(1,234)
570
(2,322)437

(1,885)
Total accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income$(81,897)$(26,353)$4,017
$(104,233)$(93,194)$605
$13,629
$(78,960)

NOTE 1315 — Shareholders' Equity
Share count and par value data related to shareholders' equity are as follows:
As ofAs of December 31,
December 31, 2015December 31, 201420182017
Preferred Stock  
Par value per shareNo par valueNo par value
Shares authorized25,000,00025,000,000
Shares outstanding
Common Stock  
Par value per shareNo par valueNo par value
Shares authorized75,000,00075,000,000
Shares issued56,242,49956,101,70056,786,84956,632,488
Shares outstanding32,548,47733,392,06032,750,72732,938,466
Treasury stock  
Shares held23,694,02222,709,64024,036,12223,694,022
CTS usesWe use the cost method to account for itsour common stock purchases. During the year ended December 31, 2015, CTS2018 we purchased 984,382342,100 shares of common stock for $18,088 under a board-authorized share repurchase program. For$9,440. During the year ended December 31, 2014, CTS purchased 460,4962017, we did not purchase any shares of common stock for $8,002.under our board-authorized share repurchase program. Approximately $17,554 is$8,114 was available for future purchases.purchases under the previously authorized stock repurchase program that was approved by our Board of Directors in April 2015. As discussed in Note 1, the Board or Directors authorized a new stock repurchase program with a maximum dollar limit of $25 million that replaced the previous program.
A roll forward of common shares outstanding is as follows:
As ofAs of December 31,
December 31, 2015December 31, 201420182017
Balance at beginning of the year33,392,060
33,558,864
32,938,466
32,762,494
Repurchases(984,382)(460,496)(342,100)
Stock option issuances5,200
101,350
Restricted share issuances135,599
192,342
Restricted stock unit issuances154,361
175,972
Balance at end of period32,548,477
33,392,060
32,750,727
32,938,466


CTS CORPORATION 61

Table of Contents

NOTE 1416 — Equity-BasedStock-Based Compensation
At December 31, 2015, CTS2018, we had 4 equity-basedfive stock-based compensation plans: the Non-Employee Directors' Stock Retirement Plan ("Directors' Plan"), the 2004 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan ("2004 Plan"), the 2009 Omnibus Equity and Performance Incentive Plan ("2009 Plan"), and the 2014 Performance & Incentive Plan ("2014 Plan"), and the 2018 Equity and Incentive Compensation Plan ("2018 Plan"). Future grants can only be made under the 20142018 Plan.
The 2009 Plan, and previously the 2004 Plan, provideThese plans allow for grants of incentive stock options, or nonqualified stock options to officers, key employees, and non-employee members of CTS' Board of Directors. In addition, the 2014 Plan, the 2009 Plan and the 2004 Plan allow for grants of stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units ("RSUs"), performance shares, performance units, and other stock awards.awards subject to the terms of the specific plans under which the awards are granted.
The following table summarizes the compensation expense included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings (Loss) related to equity-basedstock-based compensation plans:
For the Year Ended December 31,Years Ended December 31,
201520142013201820172016
Service-Based RSUs$1,944
$1,771
$2,879
$2,036
$1,762
$1,997
Performance-Based RSUs754
479
674
3,089
2,350
665
Market-Based RSUs497
410
666
Cash-settled awards131
72
76
Total$3,195
$2,660
$4,219
$5,256
$4,184
$2,738
Income tax benefit$1,201
$1,000
$1,600
1,188
1,573
1,029
Net$4,068
$2,611
$1,709
CTS
The fair value of all equity awards that vested during the periods ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016 were $5,805, $5,471, and $4,959, respectively. We recorded a tax deduction related to RSUsequity awards that vested during the year ended December 31, 20152018, in the amount of $1,047.$1,312.
The following table summarizes the unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested RSUs by type and the weighted-average period in which the expense is to be recognized:
Unrecognized
compensation
expense at
December 31,
2015
Weighted-
average
period
Unrecognized
compensation
expense at
December 31,
2018
Weighted-
average
period
Service-Based RSUs$1,475
1.28 years$1,598
1.21
Performance-Based RSUs344
1.34 years2,539
1.56
Market-Based RSUs447
1.36 years
Total$2,266
 $4,137
1.43
CTS recognizesWe recognize expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for each separately vesting portion of the award as if the award was, in substance, multiple awards.
The following table summarizes the status of these plans as of December 31, 2015:2018:
 2014 Plan2009 Plan2004 PlanDirectors' Plan
Awards originally available1,500,000
3,400,000
6,500,000
N/A
Stock options outstanding



RSUs outstanding298,882
540,247
78,947
33,974
Options exercisable



Awards available for grant1,113,383
540,247
78,947
33,974
 2018 Plan2014 Plan2009 Plan2004 PlanDirectors' Plan
Awards originally available to be granted2,500,000
1,500,000
3,400,000
6,500,000
N/A
 









Performance stock options outstanding
275,000



Maximum potential RSU and cash settled awards outstanding25,200
722,035
92,600
35,952
5,522
Maximum potential awards outstanding25,200
997,035
92,600
35,952
5,522
RSUs and cash settled awards vested and released




Awards available to be granted2,474,800




Stock Options
Stock options are exercisable in cumulative annual installments over a maximum 10-year period, commencing at least one year from the date of grant. Stock options are generally granted with an exercise price equal to the market price of CTS'our stock on the date of grant. The stock options generally vest over four years and have a 10-year contractual life. The awards generally contain provisions to either accelerate vesting or allow vesting to continue on schedule upon retirement if certain service and age requirements are met. The awards also provide for accelerated vesting if there is a change in control event.

62 CTS CORPORATION

Table of Contents

CTS estimatedWe estimate the fair value of the stock option on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and assumptions for expected price volatility, option term, risk-free interest rate, and dividend yield. Expected price volatilities wereare based on historical volatilities of CTS'our common stock. The expected option term was derived from historical data onof exercise behavior. The dividend yield was based on historical dividend payments. The risk-free rate for periods within the contractual life of the option was based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.
A summary of the status of stock options as of December 31, 2015 and changes during the year then ended, is presented below:
 Year Ended
 December 31, 2015
 OptionsWeighted-
Average
Exercise Price
Outstanding at beginning of year5,200
$12.35
Exercised(5,200)$12.35
Expired
$
Forfeited
$
Outstanding at end of period
$
Exercisable at end of period
$

 Year Ended
 December 31, 2015
Intrinsic values of stock options exercised$33
Weighted average remaining contractual life0
Aggregate intrinsic values of options outstanding and options exercisable$
There arewere no unvestedoutstanding stock options at December 31, 2015.2018, or 2017 other than the performance-based stock options described below.
Performance-Based Stock Options
During 2015 and 2016, the Compensation committee of the Board of Directors (the "Committee") granted a total of 350,000 performance-based stock options, of which 275,000 remain outstanding after forfeitures. The Performance-Based Option Awards have an exercise price of $18.37, a term of five years and generally will become exercisable (provided the optionee remains employed by the Company or an affiliate) upon our attainment of at least $600,000 in revenues during any of our four-fiscal-quarter trailing periods (as determined by the Committee) during the term. We have not recognized any expense on these Performance-Based Option Awards for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, since the revenue target is not deemed likely to be attained based on our current forecast.
Service-Based Restricted Stock Units
Service-based RSUs entitle the holder to receive one share of common stock for each unit when the unit vests. RSUs are issued to officers, key employees and non-employee directors as compensation. Generally, the RSUs vest over a three-year period. RSUs granted to non-employee directors vest one monthyear after being granted. Upon vesting, the non-employee directors elect to either receive the stock associated with the RSU immediately, or defer receipt of the stock to a future date. The fair value of the RSUs is equivalent to the trading value of CTS'our common stock on the grant date.

A summary of the status of RSUs for the 2004 Plan, 2009 Plan and 2014 Planall Plans is presented below:
UnitsWeighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
UnitsWeighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
Outstanding at January 1, 2015517,965
$12.06
  
Outstanding at January 1, 2018399,347
$14.60
  
Granted166,725
17.31
  
99,422
26.95
  
Released(166,801)12.44
  
(137,500)14.68
  
Forfeited(46,693)17.20
  
(5,679)22.07
  
Outstanding at December 31, 2015471,196
$13.27
8.07$8,312
Releasable at December 31, 2015252,347
$10.66
19.69$4,451
Outstanding at December 31, 2018355,590
$17.91
22.46$9,206
Releasable at December 31, 2018209,474
$13.76
33.63$5,423

 For the Year Ended December 31,
 201520142013
Weighted-average grant date fair value$17.31
$9.00
$10.97
Intrinsic value of RSUs released$2,933
$5,670
$4,535


CTS CORPORATION 63

Table of Contents




 Years Ended December 31,
 201820172016
Weighted-average grant date fair value$26.95
$24.32
$15.07
Intrinsic value of RSUs released$4,015
$4,485
$1,520
A summary of the status of RSUs for the Director's Plan is presented below:
 UnitsWeighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
Outstanding at January 1, 201533,974
$11.75



Granted

  
Released

  
Forfeited

  
Outstanding at December 31, 201533,974
$11.75
N/A$599
Releasable at December 31, 201533,974
$11.75
$
$599
A summary of the nonvested RSUs is presented below:
RSUsWeighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
RSUsWeighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Nonvested at January 1, 2015234,142
$14.48
Nonvested at January 1, 2018139,536
$18.56
Granted166,725
17.31
99,422
26.95
Vested(135,325)14.10
(87,163)19.05
Forfeited(46,693)17.20
(5,679)22.07
Nonvested at December 31, 2015218,849
16.29
Nonvested at December 31, 2018146,116
$23.84

 Year Ended December 31,
 201520142013
Fair value of RSUs vested$1,908
$2,055
$3,700
Performance-Based Restricted Stock Units
CTS grantsWe grant performance-based restricted stock unit awards for("PSUs") to certain executives.executives and key employees. Units may beare usually awarded in the range from zero percent to 200% of the target amount. Vesting is subject to certificationa targeted number of the fiscal results of the year prior to the target year by CTS' independent auditors.shares. The award rate for the 2016-2018, 2017-2019, and 2018-2020 PSUs is dependent upon CTS'our achievement of either sales growth targets, or cash flow targets, as noted in the following table.

Performance-Based RSUs include the following components:
Grant DateTarget
Units
Vesting
Year
Vesting
Dependency
Units
Awarded
February 11, 201354,950
2016Sales growth
February 11, 201347,100
2016Cash flow
February 14, 201415,071
2017Sales growth
February 14, 201412,918
2017Cash flow
February, 5, 201524,150
2018Sales growth
February 5, 201520,700
2018Cash flow
Market-Based Restricted Stock Units
CTS grants market-based restricted stock unit awards for certain executives and key employees. Units may be awarded in the range from zero percent to 200% of the target amount. Vesting is subject to certification of the fiscal results of the year prior to the target year by CTS' independent auditors. The award rate will be determinedrelative total shareholder return ("RTSR") using a matrix based on athe percentile ranking of CTS total stockholder return withour stock price performance compared to a peer group total shareholder return over a three-year period.

64 CTS CORPORATION

Table These awards are weighted 35% for achievement of Contents

Awardsthe sales growth metric, 30% for achievement of the cash flow metric, and 35% for achievement of the RTSR metric. Other PSUs are tied exclusivelygranted from time to CTS' total stockholder return relative to peer group companies' total stockholder return rates.time based on other performance criteria.
Market-Based RSUs include the following components:A summary of PSUs for all Plans is presented below:
Grant DateTarget
Units
Vesting
Year
Number of
Peer Group
Companies
Units
Awarded
February 11, 201326,950
201620

February 11, 201332,500
201620

February 14, 201415,071
201715

February 5, 201524,150
201823

 UnitsWeighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
Outstanding at January 1, 2018271,305
$18.77
  
Granted72,043
28.75
  
Released(72,456)18.66
  
Forfeited(21,700)17.66
  
Added by performance factor18,600
17.66
  
Outstanding at December 31, 2018267,792
$21.44
1.14$6,933
Releasable at December 31, 2018
$
$


The following table summarizes each grant of performance awards outstanding at December 31, 2018:
DescriptionGrant DateVesting
Year
Vesting
Dependency
Target
Units
 Outstanding
Maximum Number of Units to be Granted
2016-2018 Performance RSUsFebruary 16, 2016201835% RTSR, 35% sales growth, 30% cash flow92,840
185,680
Single Crystal Performance RSUsMarch 31, 20162018Various4,000
8,000
2017-2019 Performance RSUsFebruary 9, 2017201935% RTSR, 35% sales growth, 30% cash flow71,796
143,592
2017-2019 Performance RSUsFebruary 9, 20172020Operating Income27,113
27,113
2018-2020 Performance RSUsFebruary 8, 2018202135% RTSR, 35% sales growth, 30% cash flow40,223
80,446
2018- 2020 Performance RSUsFebruary 16, 2018202135% RTSR, 35% sales growth, 30% cash flow31,820
63,640
Total   267,792
508,471
Cash-Settled Restricted Stock Units
Cash-Settled RSUs entitle the holder to receive the cash equivalent of one share of common stock for each unit when the unit vests. These RSUs are issued to key employees residing in foreign locations as direct compensation. Generally, these RSUs vest over a three-year period. Cash-settled RSUs are classified as liabilities and are remeasured at each reporting date until settled. At December 31, 2018, and 2017, we had 17,248 and 14,082 cash-settled RSUs outstanding, respectively. At December 31, 2018, and 2017, liabilities of $300 and $241, respectively were included in Accrued expenses and other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
NOTE 1517 — Fair Value Measurements
U.S. GAAP stipulates that goodwill of a reporting unit be tested for impairment annually, or more frequent if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more-likely-than-not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below the carrying amount. As a first step, CTS evaluated certain qualitative factors such as general market and macro-economic conditions, entity-specific events and overall past and projected financial performance of its business operations that could affect CTS' recorded goodwill. If it is determined in the first step that it is more-likely-than-not that goodwill may be impaired, then a two-step method is applied. A two-step method is used to measure the amount of an impairment loss. The first step requires CTS to determine the fair value of the reporting unit and compare that fair value to the net book value of the reporting unit. The fair value of the reporting unit is determined using various valuation techniques, including a discounted cash flow analysis-income approach and a market approach which uses current industry information. The second step requires CTS to determine the implied fair value of goodwill and measure the impairment loss as the difference between the book value of the goodwill and the implied fair value of the goodwill. The implied fair value of goodwill must be determined in the same manner as if CTS had acquired those reporting units.
In 2015, a Step 1 goodwill test was performed by CTS' management with the assistance of a third-party valuation firm. As of December 31, 2015, it was concluded that the estimated implied fair value of goodwill exceeded the carrying value and accordingly, no goodwill impairment was required.
During the second quarter of 2013, CTS initiated the June 2013 Restructuring Plan, which impacted certain locations. This was considered a triggering event, and CTS performed an impairment analysis for the impacted intangibles and long-lived assets. The resulting intangible impairment loss related to customer-based intangibles. The fair value of these assets was measured and recorded using an income approach. Projected future cash flows related to these assets were used under this approach to determine their fair values. CTS recorded an impairment charge of approximately $3,770 for 2013. The impairment charge was recorded under "Restructuring and impairment charge" on CTS' Consolidated Statements of Earnings (Loss).
The table below summarizes the financial liabilityassets and liabilities that waswere measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 20152018 and the (gain) loss recorded during the year ended December 31, 2015:2018:
 Carrying
Value at
December 31,
2015
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
(Level 1)
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Loss Year Ended
December 31,
2015
Interest rate swap — cash flow hedge$768
$
$768
$
$768
 Asset Carrying
Value at
December 31,
2018
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
(Level 1)
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Loss (gain) for Year Ended
December 31,
2018
Interest rate swap$945
$
$945
$
$421
Foreign currency hedges$393
$
$393
$
$(484)
The table below summarizes the financial liabilityassets and liabilities that waswere measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 20142017 and the (gain) loss recorded during the year ended December 31, 2014:2017:
 Carrying
Value at
December 31,
2014
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
(Level 1)
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Loss for
Year Ended
December 31,
2014
Interest rate swap — cash flow hedge$1,020
$
$1,020
$
$488
 Asset (Liability) Carrying
Value at
December 31,
2017
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
(Level 1)
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Loss (gain) for
Year Ended
December 31,
2017
Interest rate swap$971
$
$971
$
$37
Foreign currency hedges$(742)$
$(742)$
$(38)

CTS CORPORATION 65

Table of Contents

The fair value of CTS'our interest rate swaps wasand foreign currency hedges were measured using a market approach which uses current industry information.standard valuation models using market-based observable inputs over the contractual terms, including forward yield curves, among others. There is a readily determinable market for these derivative instruments, but the market is not active and these swapstherefore they are classified within level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.




The table below provides a reconciliation of the recurring financial liabilityassets and liabilities related to interest rate swaps:swaps and foreign currency hedges:
Interest Rate
Swaps
Interest Rate
Swaps
Foreign Currency Hedges
Balance at January 1, 2014$(998)
Total gains for the period: 
Included in earnings488
Included in other comprehensive earnings(510)
Balance at January 1, 2015$(1,020)
Balance at January 1, 2017$753
$(601)
Cash settlements paid (received)37
(132)
Total gains (losses) for the period: 
 


Included in earnings768
(37)38
Included in other comprehensive earnings(516)218
(47)
Balance at December 31, 2015$(768)
Balance at January 1, 2018$971
$(742)
Cash settlements paid (received)421
(402)
Total gains (losses) for the period: 


Included in earnings(421)484
Included in other comprehensive earnings(26)1,053
Balance at December 31, 2018$945
$393
The estimated net amount that is expected to be reclassed into earnings as interest expense within the next twelve months for the interest rate swaps is approximately $800.
CTS'Our long-term debt consists of a revolving debtcredit facility which is recorded at its carrying value. There is a readily determinable market for CTS'our revolving credit debt and it is classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy as the market is not deemed to be active. The fair value of long-term debt approximates carrying value and was determined by valuing a similar hypothetical coupon bond and attributing that value to our credit facility.
NOTE 1618 — Income Taxes
Earnings before income taxes consist of the following for the years ended December 31:following:
Years Ended December 31,
201520142013201820172016
U.S.$(141)$19,205
$(5,396)$30,815
$9,315
$25,746
Non-U.S.12,402
20,143
23,459
27,288
30,938
31,499
Total$12,261
$39,348
$18,063
$58,103
$40,253
$57,245
Significant components of income tax provision/(benefit) are as follows for the years ended December 31:follows:
Years Ended December 31,
201520142013201820172016
Current: 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S.$329
$945
$1,332
$(397)$1,635
$(1,312)
Non-U.S.12,482
6,981
4,804
12,538
7,150
13,729
Total Current12,811
7,926
6,136
12,141
8,785
12,417
Deferred: 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S.(15,795)3,590
7,968
(330)17,597
13,245
Non-U.S.8,291
1,310
1,962
(240)(577)(2,797)
Total Deferred(7,504)4,900
9,930
(570)17,020
10,448
Total provision for income taxes$5,307
$12,826
$16,066
$11,571
$25,805
$22,865

66 CTS CORPORATION


Significant components of the CTS'our deferred tax assets and liabilities at December 31:are as follows:
As of December 31,
2015201420182017
Post-retirement benefits$1,837
$1,953
$1,061
$1,160
Inventory reserves1,797
1,567
1,236
1,128
Loss carry-forwards9,387
23,095
4,647
5,401
Credit carry-forwards35,082
16,903
16,909
10,793
Nondeductible accruals12,406
6,336
5,685
7,062
Research expenditures30,465
30,088
16,847
20,002
Equity compensation2,070
1,610
Stock compensation2,142
1,803
Foreign exchange loss2,522
1,009
2,245
1,373
Other1,231
2,537
207
220
Gross deferred tax assets96,797
85,098
50,979
48,942
Depreciation9,814
11,073
Depreciation and amortization11,500
9,819
Pensions11,868
9,462
11,736
12,387
Subsidiaries' unremitted earnings7,461

1,258
1,662
Gross deferred tax liabilities29,143
20,535
24,494
23,868
Net deferred tax assets67,654
64,563
26,485
25,074
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance(10,266)(12,938)(8,274)(8,182)
Total net deferred tax assets$57,388
$51,625
$18,211
$16,892
The current and long-term deferred tax assets and current and long-term deferred tax liabilities are as of December 31:follows below:
 20152014
Current deferred tax assets$6,025
$8,708
Current deferred tax liabilities(6,731)(8)
Total current deferred tax assets(706)8,700
Non-current deferred tax assets58,544
43,120
Non-current deferred tax liabilities(450)(195)
Total non-current deferred tax assets58,094
42,925
Total net deferred tax assets$57,388
$51,625
The current and non-current deferred tax assets and current and non-current deferred tax liabilities were not netted since these items relate to different tax jurisdictions. Current deferred tax assets, current deferred tax liabilities and non-current deferred tax liabilities are included as components of other current assets, accrued expenses and other liabilities and other long-term obligations respectively, on CTS' Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014.
 As of December 31,
 20182017
Non-current deferred tax assets$22,201
$20,694
Non-current deferred tax liabilities$(3,990)$(3,802)
Total net deferred tax assets$18,211
$16,892
At each reporting date, CTS weighswe weigh all available positive and negative evidence to assess whether it is more-likely- than-notmore-likely-than-not that the Company's deferred tax assets, including deferred tax assets associated with accumulated loss carryforwards and tax credits in the various jurisdictions in which it operates, will be realized. As of December 31, 2015, CTS2018, and 2017, we recorded deferred tax assets related to certain U.S. state and non-U.S. income tax loss carryforwards of $9,387$4,647 and $5,401, respectively, and U.S. and non-U.S. tax credits of $35,082. Such$16,909 and $10,793, respectively. The deferred tax assets expire in varying amounts from 2016 to 2035.various years primarily between 2021 and 2038.
Generally, CTS assesseswe assess if it is more-likely-than-not that itsour net deferred tax assets will be realized during the available carry-forward periods. However, CTS hasAs a result, we have determined that valuation allowances of $10,266$8,274 and $12,938$8,182 should be provided for certain deferred tax assets at December 31, 20152018, and December 31, 2014,2017, respectively. As of December 31, 2015,2018, the valuation allowances relate to certain U.S. state and non-U.S. loss carry-forwards and certain U.S. state and non-U.S. tax credits that management does not anticipate will be utilized. The decrease in the valuation allowance from December 31, 2014 to December 31, 2015 is primarily the result of the expiration of certain carry-forwards partially offset by increases in the basis of management's judgment regarding realizability of the related assets.
No valuation allowance was recorded in 20152018 against the U.S. federal foreign tax credit carryforwards of $25,909,$7,316, which expire in varying amounts between 2023 and 2025 as well as the research and development tax credits of $7,577$6,516, which expire in varying amounts between 20162021 and 2035, and the alternative minimum tax credit carryforward of $2,565, which has no expiration. CTS2038. We assessed the anticipated

CTS CORPORATION 67

Table of Contents

realization of those tax credits utilizing future taxable income projections. Based on those projections, management believes it is more-likely-than-not that CTSwe will realize the benefits of these credit carryforwards.







The following table reconciles taxes at the United StatesU.S. federal statutory rate to the effective income tax rate from continuing operations for the years ended December 31:rate:
Years Ended December 31,
201520142013201820172016
Taxes at the U.S. statutory rate35.0 %35.0 %35.0 %21.0 %35.0 %35.0 %
State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit(0.1)%0.7 %1.0 %1.2 %1.1 %1.4 %
Non-U.S. income taxed at rates different than the U.S. statutory rate(16.7)%(7.6)%(9.9)%0.8 %(9.0)%(7.5)%
Foreign source income, net of associated foreign tax credits6.9 %3.5 %60.9 %4.1 %0.1 %5.3 %
Benefit of tax credits(4.6)%(1.3)%(3.9)%(0.9)%(1.4)%(1.0)%
Non-deductible expenses1.3 %2.8 %(2.4)%1.3 %1.5 %0.7 %
Stock compensation - excess tax benefits(0.9)%(1.5)%(0.8)%
Adjustment to valuation allowances37.8 %(0.4)%8.2 %(0.6)%(4.4)%3.8 %
Benefit from prior period foreign tax credits(133.0)% % %
Other changes in tax laws and rates(6.1)% % %
Change in unrecognized tax benefits59.5 % %0.7 %(1.7)%2.0 %3.3 %
Impacts of unremitted foreign earnings60.8 % % %1.1 %0.9 %0.6 %
Impacts related to the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act(0.6)%44.7 % %
Other(3.6)%(0.1)%(0.6)%1.2 %(4.9)%(0.9)%
Effective income tax rate43.3 %32.6 %89.0 %19.9 %64.1 %39.9 %
During 2015, CTS determined that it would change its position regardingOn December 22, 2017, the U.S. federalTax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “Tax Act”) was signed into law making significant changes to the Internal Revenue Code. Changes include, but are not limited to, a corporate tax treatmentrate decrease from 35% to 21% effective for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, the transition of U.S international taxation from a worldwide tax system to a territorial system, and a one-time transition tax on the mandatory deemed repatriation of cumulative foreign taxes paid. CTS claimedearnings as of December 31, 2017. We recognized a foreign tax credit on its 2014 U.S. federalprovisional amount of $18,001 as an additional income tax returnexpense in the fourth quarter of 2017. This amount included $11,734 related to the mandatory deemed one-time transition tax and plans$6,267 related to file amendedthe remeasurement of certain deferred tax returnsassets and liabilities.
On December 22, 2017, Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 ("SAB 118") was issued to address the application of U.S. GAAP in situations when a registrant does not have the necessary information available, prepared, or analyzed (including computations) in reasonable detail to complete the accounting for 2006 - 2013 in order to claim non-US taxes paid as a credit againstcertain income tax rather than as a deduction. The filingeffects of the amended returns reducedTax Act. The remeasurement period for SAB 118 ended on December 22, 2018, and upon completion of our analysis we determined the deferred tax asset for federal loss carryforwards by $8,214, and increased its available foreign tax credit carryforward by $24,519, resultingfinal impact of the Tax Act resulted in a netan additional tax benefit of $16,305.$348 during the fourth quarter of 2018. This amount included a $589 tax benefit related to the one-time transition tax and $241 tax expense related to the remeasurement of certain deferred tax assets and liabilities.
In general, it is CTS’s practice and intention to reinvest the earningsGenerally, outside of its non-U.S. subsidiaries in those operations. However during 2015, CTS determined that as a result of changes in the business, the foreign earnings of its subsidiaries in Canada and the U.K. were no longer permanently reinvested. Therefore, a provision for the expected taxes on repatriation of those earnings was recorded. In addition, although CTS plansUnited Kingdom, it has been our historical practice to permanently reinvest the earnings of its Chinese facilities outsideour non-U.S. subsidiaries in those operations. As previously noted, the U.S., CTS has determinedTax Act made significant changes to the taxation of undistributed foreign earnings, requiring that it will not maintain thoseall previously untaxed earnings in China in orderand profits of our controlled foreign corporation be subjected to mitigate future currency risk. Asa one-time mandatory deemed repatriation tax. The transition tax substantially eliminated the basis differences that existed prior to the Tax Act. However, there are limited other taxes that could continue to apply such as foreign withholding and certain state taxes. We completed the evaluation of our indefinite reinvestment assertion as a result of these changes, CTS recorded a tax expensethe Tax Act during the fourth quarter of $7,4612018 and decided not to reinvest the current year earnings of our primary operations, except for in 2015. Management intendsthe Czech Republic, Denmark, India, Mexico and Taiwan. We intend to continue to permanentlyindefinitely reinvest all other remaining current and priorthe earnings in jurisdictions located outside of the U.S. As of December 31, 2015, no provision has been madethese non-U.S. subsidiaries.
The Tax Act also includes provisions for U.S. incomeGlobal Intangible Low-Taxed Income (“GILTI”) wherein taxes on approximately $116,192foreign income are imposed in excess of a deemed return on tangible assets of foreign earnings, which are permanently reinvested outside ofcorporations. We elected to recognize the U.S. Upon distribution of those earningstax on GILTI as an expense in the form of dividends or otherwise, CTS would be subjectperiod the tax is incurred. We have not provided deferred taxes related to U.S. income taxes net of related foreign tax credits, state income taxes, and withholding taxes payable to the various foreign countries. Determination oftemporary differences that upon their reversal will impact the amount of unrecognized deferred U.S. tax liability is not practical because of complexities such as potential foreign tax credits, local restrictions on distributions, and treaty implications associated withincome subject to GILTI in the related calculation.period.
CTS recognizesWe recognize the financial statement benefit of a tax position when it is more-likely-than-not, based on its technical merits, that the position will be sustained upon examination. A tax position that meets the "more-likely-than-not"more-likely-than-not threshold is then measured to determine the amount of benefit to be recognized in the financial statements. As of December 31, 2015, CTS has2018, we have approximately $11,008$6,203 of unrecognized tax benefits, which if recognized, would impact the effective tax rate. CTS doesWe do not anticipate any significant changes in itsour unrecognized tax benefits within the next 12 months.




A reconciliation of the beginning and ending unrecognized tax benefits is provided below:
2015201420182017
Balance at January 1$3,890
$4,043
$7,306
$12,347
Increase related to current year tax positions1,406
40
55

Increase related to prior year tax positions5,728
5
Decrease as a result of lapse of statute of limitations(16)(114)
(Decrease) increase related to prior year tax positions(36)1,290
Decrease related to lapse in statute of limitation(1,076)
Decrease related to settlements with taxing authorities
(14)(46)(6,331)
Other decrease
(70)
Balance at December 31$11,008
$3,890
$6,203
$7,306

68 CTS CORPORATION

Table of Contents

CTS'Our continuing practice is to recognize interest and/or penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as income tax expense. As of December 31, 20152018, and December 31, 2014, $1,2062017, $2,515 and $0,$2,596, respectively, of interest and penalties were accrued.
CTS isWe are subject to taxation in the U.S., various states, and in non-U.S. jurisdictions. CTS'Our U.S. income tax returns are primarily subject to examination from 20112015 through 2014,2017; however, U.S. tax authorities also have the ability to review prior tax years to the extent loss carryforwards and tax credit carryforwards are utilized. The open years for the non-U.S. tax returns range from 20072010 through 20142017 based on local statutes.
NOTE 17 — Discontinued Operations
On October 2, 2013, CTS completed the sale of its EMS business to Benchmark for approximately $75,000 in cash. Included in the transaction were five manufacturing facilities (Moorpark, California; Londonderry, New Hampshire; Bangkok, Thailand; Matamoros, Mexico and San Jose, California) and approximately 1,000 employees.
The Consolidated Statement of Earnings (Loss) of the EMS discontinued operations is as follows:
 Year Ended
 December 31, 2013
Net sales$155,055
Cost of goods sold142,589
Selling, general and administrative expenses11,617
Restructuring and impairment charge1,444
Operating loss(595)
Other expense, net(345)
Loss before income taxes(940)
Income tax benefit(162)
Loss from discontinued operations(778)
Loss on sale of EMS operations (net of tax of $3,923)(5,148)
Net loss from discontinued operations$(5,926)
Included in Consolidated Statement of Earnings (Loss) for discontinued operations was approximately $700 of amortization on net intangible assets for the year ended December 31, 2013.
NOTE 1819 - Business Acquisitions

On October 28 2015, CTSMay 15, 2017, we acquired Filter Sensing Technologies Inc. (“FST”),100% of the equity interests in Noliac A/S, a privately-held company, for $1.9$19.3 million in cash, plus contingent consideration of $1.6 million. FSTcash. Noliac A/S is a developerdesigner and designermanufacturer of sensing technologytape cast and bulk piezoelectric material as well as transducers for radio frequency measurementuse in the telecommunications, industrial, medical, and control systems.defense industries. This acquisition adds a cutting-edge sensing technologywill enable us to CTS' transportation portfolio and allowsincrease our product base within our ceramics product lines as well as expand our presence in the Company to participate in a market that is expected be $150-$300 million in size by 2025 as new filtering solutions gain traction.European market.


The purchase price of $19,121, net of cash acquired of $199, has been allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed on the acquisition date based on their fair values.








CTS CORPORATION 69


The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition:
  Estimated Fair Values at October 28, 2015 Fair Values at May 15, 2017
Current assets  $555

$2,836
Property, plant and equipment  29

580
Other assets
395
Goodwill  1,818

9,313
In-process research and development intangible asset  2,200
Other assets  8
Intangible assets
9,142
Fair value of assets acquired  4,610

22,266
Less fair value of liabilities acquired  (1,205)
(3,145)
Less fair value of contingent consideration (1,550)
Total cash purchase price  $1,855
Net cash paid
$19,121
Goodwill recorded in connection with this acquisition represents the above acquisition is primarily attributablevalue we expect to know-howbe created by combining the operations of the acquired workforcebusiness with our existing operations, including the expansion into markets within our existing business, access to new customers, and potential cost savings and synergies. Goodwill related to this acquisition is expected to be deductible for tax purposes.
The following table summarizes the carrying amounts and weighted average lives of the acquired intangible assets:
 Carrying Value Weighted Average Amortization Period (in years)
Developed technology$7,581
 15.0
Customer relationships937
 10.0
Other624
 3.0
Total$9,142
 13.7


We incurred $291 in relationtransaction related costs during the year ended December 31, 2017. These costs are included in selling, general, and administrative costs in our Consolidated Statements of Earnings.
On March 11, 2016, we acquired all of the outstanding membership interests in CTG Advanced Materials, LLC (“CTG-AM”), a privately-held company, for $73 million in cash plus a working capital adjustment. CTG-AM, formerly operated as H.C. Materials, is the market leading designer and manufacturer of single crystal piezoelectric materials, serving major original equipment manufacturers throughout the medical marketplace. These materials enable high definition ultrasound imaging (3D and 4D), as well as intravascular ultrasound applications. Other applications for these materials include wireless pacemakers, implantable hearing aids, and defense technologies.

With the CTG-AM acquisition, we gained technology and proprietary manufacturing methods that expand our offering of piezoelectric materials. This allows us to become the leading large-scale commercial producer of both single crystal materials and traditional piezoelectric ceramics.
The purchase price of $73,063, net of cash acquired of $4, has been allocated to the technology being developed.
The FST acquisition was accounted for using the acquisition methodfair values of accounting whereby the total purchase price is allocated to tangible and intangible assets and liabilities based on the fair market values on the dateacquired as of acquisition. CTS determined the purchase price allocations based on estimates ofMarch 11, 2016.
The following table summarizes the fair values of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed. assumed at the date of acquisition:


Fair Values at March 11, 2016
Current assets
$4,215
Property, plant and equipment
6,173
Other assets
37
Goodwill
27,879
Intangible assets
35,427
Fair value of assets acquired
73,731
Less fair value of liabilities acquired
(668)
Net cash paid
$73,063
Goodwill recorded in connection with this acquisition represents the value we expect to be created by combining the operations of the acquired business with our existing operations, including the expansion into markets within our existing business, access to new customers, and potential cost savings and synergies. Goodwill related to this acquisition is expected to be deductible for tax purposes.
The allocations for goodwillfollowing table summarizes the carrying amounts and otherweighted average lives of the acquired intangible assets were based on historical experienceassets:

Carrying Value
Weighted Average Amortization Period (in years)
Developed technology$23,730

15.0
Customer relationships and contracts11,502

14.6
Other195

0.8
Total$35,427

14.8

We incurred $804 in transaction related costs during the year ended December 31, 2016. These costs are included in selling, general, and third party evaluation.administrative costs in our Consolidated Statements of Earnings.

NOTE 1920 — Geographic Data
Financial information relating to CTS'our operations by geographic area were as follows:
Net Sales from continuing operationsYear Ended December 31,
201520142013
Net SalesYears Ended December 31,
201820172016
United States$238,796
$234,323
$223,212
$313,489
$287,092
$276,033
Singapore8,379
11,510
13,812
6,724
5,596
6,668
United Kingdom

28,167
Taiwan20,802
18,586
17,121
China55,825
61,683
72,509
79,380
66,510
59,506
Canada24,519
35,145
38,061
Czech Republic36,348
44,424
18,117
36,528
34,476
34,767
Other non-U.S.18,443
16,936
15,583
13,560
10,733
2,584
Consolidated net sales$382,310
$404,021
$409,461
$470,483
$422,993
$396,679
Sales are attributed to countries based upon the origin of the sale.
Long-Lived AssetsYear Ended December 31,Years Ended December 31,
20152014201320182017
United States$32,239
$33,048
$36,664
$53,950
$44,010
China30,937
31,782
33,277
32,973
32,464
United Kingdom1,042
1,055
2,004
Singapore218
80
117
Canada116
462
478
Taiwan
2,127
1,775
3,752
3,540
Thailand


Switzerland

19
Czech Republic5,976
5,518
Other non-U.S5,320
2,860
535
2,750
2,715
Consolidated long-lived assets$69,872
$71,414
$74,869
$99,401
$88,247

70 CTS CORPORATION

Table of Contents

NOTE 2021 — Quarterly Financial Data
Quarterly Results of Operations
(Unaudited)
FirstSecondThirdFourthFirstSecondThirdFourth
2015 
 
 
 
2018 
 
 
 
Net sales$113,530
$118,021
$118,859
$120,073
Gross margin$38,433
$41,813
$42,082
$42,645
Operating earnings$13,359
$14,544
$16,118
$17,017
Net earnings$11,548
$7,209
$10,211
$17,564
Basic earnings per share$0.35
$0.22
$0.31
$0.53
Diluted earnings per share$0.34
$0.21
$0.30
$0.52
2017 
 
 
 
Net sales$98,311
$100,071
$90,646
$93,282
$100,154
$105,686
$106,243
$110,910
Gross margin32,136
33,373
31,446
30,154
$34,224
$35,794
$37,538
$32,875
Operating earnings (loss)10,488
10,544
(3,850)931
$12,196
$13,208
$13,111
$(19)
Net earnings (loss)6,287
19,080
(4,760)(13,653)$8,484
$9,966
$9,619
$(13,621)
Basic earnings (loss) per share$0.19
$0.58
$(0.15)$(0.42)$0.26
$0.30
$0.29
$(0.41)
Diluted earnings (loss) per share$0.19
$0.57
$(0.15)$(0.42)$0.25
$0.30
$0.29
$(0.41)
2014 
 
 
 
Net sales$100,706
$102,980
$99,957
$100,378
Gross margin30,615
33,823
32,499
33,026
Operating earnings10,845
9,945
11,223
10,310
Net earnings5,080
6,361
8,117
6,964
Basic earnings per share$0.15
$0.19
$0.24
$0.21
Diluted earnings per share$0.15
$0.19
$0.24
$0.21


CTS CORPORATION 71


CTS CORPORATION
SCHEDULE II — VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

  Additions  
(in thousands)Balance at
Beginning
of Period
Charged/
(Credit)
to Expense
Charged
to Other
Accounts
DeductionsBalance
at End
of Period
Year ended December 31, 2015
Allowance for doubtful accounts
$100
$33
$
$
$133
Year ended December 31, 2014
Allowance for doubtful accounts
$130
$(38)$
$8
$100
Year ended December 31, 2013:
Allowance for doubtful accounts
$811
$(130)$(442)$(109)$130
(in thousands)Balance at
Beginning
of Period
Charged to ExpenseCharged
to Other
Accounts
(Write-offs) / RecoveriesBalance
at End
of Period
Year ended December 31, 2018
Allowance for doubtful accounts
$357
$56
$(8)$(21)$384
Year ended December 31, 2017
Allowance for doubtful accounts
$170
$248
$9
$(70)$357
Year ended December 31, 2016
Allowance for doubtful accounts
$133
$44
$
$(7)$170


72 CTS CORPORATION


Item 9.  Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
Not applicable.
Item 9A.  Controls and Procedures
Pursuant to Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, management, under the direction of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this annual report. Based on such evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2015.2018.
The report from Grant Thornton LLP on its audit of the effectiveness of CTS'our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015,2018, is included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K under the heading "Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm" and is incorporated herein by reference. The Report of Management on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, which can be found following the signature page of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, is incorporated herein by reference.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Beginning January 1, 2018, we adopted ASC 606 "Revenue from Contracts with Customers". It did not have a material impact on our ongoing net income; however, we implemented changes to our processes related to revenue recognition and related internal controls. These changes included the development of new policies related to the five-step model, training, ongoing contract review requirements, and gathering of information to comply with disclosure requirements.
The Company is implementing an enterprise resource planning (“ERP”) system on a worldwide basis, which is expected to improve the efficiency of certain operational, financial, and related transactional processes. The implementation began in 2018 and is expected to continue in phases over the next year. The implementation of a worldwide ERP system has and will continue to affect the processes that constitute our internal control over financial reporting and will require annual testing for effectiveness.
The Company completed implementation in certain subsidiaries/locations during 2018, including aspects relative to the United States, and will continue to roll out the ERP system into 2019. As with any new information technology application we implement, this application, along with the internal controls over financial reporting included in the related processes, was appropriately considered within the testing for effectiveness with respect to the implementation in these instances. We concluded, as part of our evaluation described in the above paragraphs, that the implementation of the ERP system in these circumstances has not materially affected our internal control over financial reporting.
There were no additional changes in our internal control over financial reporting for the yearquarter ended December 31, 20152018 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Item 9B.  Other Information
Not applicable.

CTS CORPORATION 73


PART III
Item 10.  Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Please see Part I, Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for information about our executive officers, which is incorporated by reference herein. Information with respect to Directors and Corporate Governance may be found in our definitive proxy statement to be delivered to shareholders in connection with our 20162019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Such information is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 11.  Executive Compensation
Information with respect to this item may be found in our definitive proxy statement to be delivered to shareholders in connection with our 20162019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Such information is incorporated herein by reference.

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
The following table provides information about shares of CTS common stock that could be issued under all of CTS'our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2015:2018:
Plan Category
(a)
Number of Securities
to be Issued Upon
Exercise of
Outstanding
Options, RSUs, Warrants
and Rights
(b)
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding
Options, RSUs, Warrants
and Rights
(c)
Number of Securities
Remaining Available for
Future Issuance Under
Equity Compensation Plans
(Excluding Securities
Reflected in Column(a))
(a)
Number of Securities
to be Issued Upon
Exercise of
Outstanding
Options, RSUs, Warrants
and Rights (2)
(b)
Weighted-Average
Grant Date Fair Value of
Outstanding
Options, RSUs, Warrants
and Rights
(c)
Number of Securities
Remaining Available for
Future Issuance Under
Equity Compensation Plans
(Excluding Securities
Reflected in Column(a))
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders918,076
$13.27
1,732,577
1,133,539
$13.48
2,474,800
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders(1)
33,974

33,974
5,522


Total952,050
$13.27
1,766,551
1,139,061
 2,474,800

(1) In 1990, we adopted the Stock Retirement Plan for Non-Employee Directors. Prior to December 1, 2004, we annually credited an account for each non-employee director with 800 CTS common stock units. We also annually credited each deferred stock account with an additional number of CTS common stock units representing the amount of dividends which would have been paid on an equivalent number of shares of CTS common stock for each quarter during the preceding calendar year. As of December 1, 2004, this plan was amended to preclude crediting any additional CTS common stock units under the plan. Upon retirement, a participating non-employee director is entitled to receive one share of CTS common stock for each CTS common stock unit in his deferred stock account. On December 31, 2018, the deferred stock accounts contained a total of 5,522 CTS common stock units.
(1)In 1990, CTS adopted the Stock Retirement Plan for Non-Employee Directors. Prior to December 1, 2004, CTS annually credited an account for each non-employee director with 800 CTS common stock units. CTS also annually credited each deferred stock account with an additional number of CTS common stock units representing the amount of dividends which would have been paid on an equivalent number of shares of CTS common stock for each quarter during the preceding calendar year. As of December 1, 2004, this plan was amended to preclude crediting any additional CTS common stock units under the plan. Upon retirement, a participating non-employee director is entitled to receive one share of CTS common stock for each CTS common stock unit in his deferred stock account. On December 31, 2015, the deferred stock accounts contained a total of 33,974 CTS common stock units.
(2) Based on achievement of the maximum targets for performance-based equity grants.
Item 12.  Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Shareholder Matters
Information with respect to this item may be found in our definitive proxy statement to be delivered to shareholders in connection with our 20162019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Such information is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 13.  Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Information with respect to this item may be found in our definitive proxy statement to be delivered to shareholders in connection with our 20162019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Such information is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 14.  Principal Accountant Fees and Services
Information with respect to this item may be found in our definitive proxy statement to be delivered to shareholders in connection with our 20162019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Such information is incorporated herein by reference.

74 CTS CORPORATION


PART IV
Item 15.  Exhibits and Financial Statements Schedules
The following Consolidated Financial Statements of CTS Corporation and Subsidiaries are included herein:
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Consolidated Statements of Earnings: Years ended December 31, 2018, December 31, 2017, and December 31, 2016
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Earnings: Years ended December 31, 2018, December 31, 2017, and December 31, 2016
Consolidated Balance Sheets: December 31, 2018, and December 31, 2017
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows: Years ended December 31, 2018, December 31, 2017, and December 31, 2016
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity: Years Ended December 31, 2018, December 31, 2017, and December 31, 2016
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Schedule II: Valuation and Qualifying Accounts and Reserves
Other schedules have been omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is shown in the Consolidated Financial Statements or Notes thereto.
(a) (3) Exhibits
All references to documents filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K, were filed by CTS, File No. 1-4639.
 (2)(ii)Stock Purchase Agreement, dated October 2, 2013, between CTS Corporation and Benchmark Electronics, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2(a) to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 29, 2013, filed with the SEC on October 29, 2013.**
(3)(i) 
    
 (3)(ii) 
    
 (10)(a) Form of Director and Officer Indemnification Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on November 12, 2008).
(10)(b)Form of Director & Officer Indemnification Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 18, 2015).
(10)(c)
    
 (10)(d)(b) 
    
 (10)(e)(c) CTS Corporation Pension Plan (formerly known as the CTS Corporation Salaried Employees' Pension Plan) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)(t) to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, filed with the SEC on February 14, 2003).*
(10)(f)Amendments to the CTS Corporation Pension Plan (formerly known as the CTS Corporation Salaried Employees' Pension Plan) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(b) to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 29, 2003, filed with the SEC on July 25, 2003).*
(10)(g)
    
 (10)(h)(d) Amendments to the CTS Corporation Pension Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(p) to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, filed with the SEC on February 27, 2006).*
(10)(i)Amendments to the CTS Corporation Pension Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a) to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 2, 2006, filed with the SEC on April 26, 2006).*
(10)(j)Credit Agreement, dated as of November 18, 2010, by and among CTS Corporation, the Lenders named therein and Harris N.A. as L/C Issuer, and Administrative Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a) to the Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on November 22, 2010).
(10)(k)First amendment to Credit Agreements dated as of January 10, 2012, by and among CTS Corporation, the lenders name therein and Harris N.A. as L/C issuer and administrative agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a) to the Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 11, 2012).

CTS CORPORATION 75


(10)(l)Credit Agreement Between CTS Corporation and BMO Harris Bank N.A. dated August 10, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 12, 2015).
    
 (10)(m)(e) 
(10)(f)
(10)(n)Performance Share Agreement between CTS Corporation and Vinod M. Khilnani, dated August 1, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a) to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, filed with the SEC on October 24, 2007).*
    
 (10)(o)(g) 
    
 (10)(p)(h) Amendments to the CTS Corporation Pension Plan (formerly known as the CTS Corporation Salaried Employees' Pension Plan) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(bb) to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed with the SEC on February 23, 2009).*
(10)(q)
    

 (10)(r)(i) 
    
 (10)(s)(j) 
    
 (10)(t)(k) 
    
 (10)(u)(l) Amendments to the CTS Corporation Pension Plan (formerly known as the CTS Corporation Salaried Employees' Pension Plan) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(w) to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, filed with the SEC on February 24, 2011).*
(10)(v)
    
 (10)(w)(m) 
    
 (10)(x)(n) 
    
 (10)(y)(o) 2012-2013 Performance Restricted Stock Unit Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(bb) to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 filed with the SEC on March 3, 2014).*
(10)(z)
    
 (10)(aa)(p) CTS Corporation 2014 - 2016 Performance Restricted Stock Unit Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a) to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 30, 2014, filed with the SEC on April 29, 2014).*
(10)(bb)CTS Corporation 2013 - 2015 Performance Restricted Stock Unit Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a) to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013, filed with the SEC on April 25, 2013).*

76 CTS CORPORATION


(10)(cc)First Amendment to the CTS Corporation Executive Severance Policy (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(b) to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013, filed with the SEC on April 25, 2013).*
    
 (10)(dd)(q) Separation Agreement for Thomas Kroll (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on January 7, 2014).*
(10)(ee)
    
 (10)(ff)(r) Separation
(10(gg)Transition Agreement dated June 26, 2015, by and betweenBetween CTS Corporation and Anthony Urban(incorporatedCTS International B.V. and BMO Harris Bank N.A. dated February 12, 2019 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 15, 2019).
(10)(s)
(10)(t)
(10)(u)
(10)(v)
(10)(w)
(10)(x)
    
 (21) 
    
 (23) 
    
 (31)(a) 
    
 (31)(b) 
    
 (32)(a) 
    

 (32)(b) 
    
 101.INS XBRL Instance Document
    
 101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
    
 101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
    
 101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
    
 101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
    
 101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document


*Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
**Pursuant to Item 601(b) (2) of Regulation S-K, certain exhibits and schedules have been omitted and CTS agrees to furnish supplementally to the Securities and Exchange Commission a copy of any omitted exhibits upon request.


CTS CORPORATION 77


SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 CTS Corporation
Date: February 24, 201622, 2019By: 
/s/ Ashish Agrawal
   
Ashish Agrawal
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial andOfficer)
Date: February 22, 2019By:
/s/ William Cahill
William Cahill
Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Date: February 24, 201622, 2019By: 
/s/ Kieran O'Sullivan
   
Kieran O'Sullivan
Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
    
Date: February 24, 201622, 2019By: /s/ Robert A. Profusek
   
Robert A. Profusek
Lead Director
    
Date: February 24, 2016By:
/s/ Walter S. Catlow
Walter S. Catlow
Director
Date: February 24, 2016By:
/s/ Lawrence J. Ciancia
Lawrence J. Ciancia
Director
Date: February 24, 201622, 2019By: 
/s/ Patricia K. Collawn
   
Patricia K. Collawn
Director
    
Date: February 24, 201622, 2019By: 
/s/ Gordon Hunter
   
Gordon Hunter
Director
    
Date: February 24, 201622, 2019By: 
/s/ William S. Johnson
   
William S. Johnson
Director
    
Date: February 24, 201622, 2019By: 
/s/ Diana M. Murphy
   
Diana M. Murphy
Director
    
Date: February 22, 2019By:/s/ Alfonso G. Zulueta
Alfonso G. Zulueta
Director


78 CTS CORPORATION


Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
CTS' management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including CTS' Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, CTS conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013 framework) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
In its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015,2018, management determined that its internal control over financial reporting werewas effective as of December 31, 2015.2018. Grant Thornton LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has audited CTS' internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015,2018, as stated in their report which is included herein.

CTS Corporation
Elkhart, IndianaLisle, IL
February 24, 201622, 2019
 
  
/s/ Kieran O'Sullivan 
Kieran O'Sullivan
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
 
  
/s/ Ashish Agrawal 
Ashish Agrawal
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
 

CTS CORPORATION 7975