UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
þANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended June 30, 20132016
OR
¨TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from                     to                     
Commission file number: 001-34249
FARMER BROS. CO.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
   
Delaware 95-0725980
(State of Incorporation) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

20333 South Normandie Avenue, Torrance, California 9050213601 North Freeway, Suite 200, Fort Worth, Texas 76177
(Address of Principal Executive Offices; Zip Code)

310-787-5200888-998-2468
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each Class Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
Common Stock, $1.00 par value The NASDAQ StockGlobal Select Market LLC
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.   YES  ¨    NO  þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.   YES  ¨    NO  þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.   YES  þ    NO  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).   YES  þ    NO  ¨





Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. þ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer  ¨        Accelerated filer  þ        Non-accelerated filer  ¨        Smaller reporting company  ¨
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).   YES  ¨    NO  þ
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the closing price at which the Farmer Bros. Co. common stock was sold on December 31, 20122015 was $88.6278.4 million.
As of October 8, 2013September 12, 2016 the registrant had 16,454,21216,781,561 shares outstanding of its common stock, par value $1.00 per share, which is the registrant’s only class of common stock.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
PortionsSpecified portions of the registrant’s definitive proxy statement to be filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) pursuant to Regulation 14A in connection with the registrant’s 20132016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Proxy Statement”) or portions of the registrant’s 10-K/A, to be filed subsequent to the date hereof, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this report. Such Proxy Statement or 10-K/A will be filed with the SEC not later than 120 days after the conclusion of the registrant’s fiscal year ended June 30, 20132016.







EXPLANATORY NOTE

This Annual Report on Form 10-K of Farmer Bros. Co., a Delaware corporation (the “Company,” “we,” “our” or “Farmer Bros.”), for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013 (this “Form 10-K”), includes restatement of the following previously issued consolidated financial statements and data (and related disclosures) as of and for the periods (collectively, the “Restated Periods”) noted in the table below.
Type of Financial InformationDate or Period
Consolidated balance sheetAs of June 30, 2012
Consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), cash flows and stockholders' equityFiscal years ended June 30, 2012 and 2011
Consolidated balance sheet information included in Notes to Consolidated Financial StatementsAs of June 30, 2011
Consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows included in Notes to Consolidated Financial StatementsFiscal year ended June 30, 2010
Selected financial dataFiscal years ended and as of June 30, 2012, 2011, 2010 and 2009
Unaudited quarterly financial dataQuarters ended September 30, 2012, December 31, 2012, March 31, 2013 and each quarter in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012
Management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operationsAs of and for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2012 and 2011
The restatement results from errors related to our accounting for certain postretirement benefit obligations for our retiree medical plan, failure to timely adopt accounting guidance relating to a postretirement death benefit, when originally issued, and failure to record the appropriate amounts reflecting the cash surrender value of life insurance policies purchased to fund the postretirement death benefit. The financial statements and data for the Restated Periods also reflect corrections for certain other immaterial adjustments and reclassifications to conform to the current year presentation.
The combined impact of the adjustments to the applicable line items in our consolidated financial statements for the Restated Periods is set forth in Note 2, “Restatement,” and Note 19, “Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited),” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8, of this Form 10-K. Management has also concluded that, as of June 30, 2013, our internal controls over financial reporting were not effective due to a material weakness in our controls over our accounting for and reporting of other postretirement benefit obligations. The following items of this Form 10-K are impacted as a result of the restatement and material weakness:
Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors;
Part II, Item 6, Selected Financial Data;
Part II, Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations;
Part II, Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data; and
Part II, Item 9A, Controls and Procedures.
We believe that presenting all of the restated information regarding the Restated Periods in this Form 10-K allows investors to review all pertinent data in a single presentation. In addition, the Company's Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q to be filed during fiscal 2014 will include the restated fiscal 2013 comparable prior quarter and year-to-date periods. We have not filed and do not intend to file amendments to (i) our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the first three quarterly periods in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, or (ii) our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012. Accordingly, investors should rely only on the financial information and other disclosures regarding the Restated Periods in this Form 10-K or in future filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), as applicable, and not on any previously issued or filed reports, earnings releases or similar communications relating to these periods.





TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
PART I  
ITEM 1.Business
ITEM 1A.Risk Factors
ITEM 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments
ITEM 2.Properties
ITEM 3.Legal Proceedings
ITEM 4.Mine Safety Disclosures
PART II  
ITEM 5.Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
ITEM 6.Selected Financial Data
ITEM 7.Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
ITEM 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
ITEM 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
ITEM 9.Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
ITEM 9A.Controls and Procedures
ITEM 9B.Other Information
PART III  
ITEM 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
ITEM 11.Executive Compensation
ITEM 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
ITEM 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
ITEM 14.Principal Accountant Fees and Services
PART IV  
ITEM 15.Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
ITEM 16.Form 10-K Summary
SIGNATURES
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are not based on historical factThis report and areother documents we file with the SEC contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws and regulations. These statementsthat are based on management’s current expectations, assumptions, estimates, forecasts and observationsprojections about us, our future performance, our financial condition, our products, our business strategy, our beliefs and our management’s assumptions. In addition, we, or others on our behalf, may make forward-looking statements in press releases or written statements, or in our communications and discussions with investors and analysts in the normal course of future eventsbusiness through meetings, webcasts, phone calls and include any statements that do not directly relate to any historical or current fact.conference calls. These forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words like “anticipates,” “estimates,” “projects,” “expects,” “plans,” “believes,” “intends,” “will,” “could,” “may,” “assumes” and other words of similar meaning. OwingThese statements are based on management’s beliefs, assumptions, estimates and observations of future events based on information available to our management at the time the statements are made and include any statements that do not relate to any historical or current fact. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and they involve certain risks, uncertainties inherent in forward-looking statements, actualand assumptions that are difficult to predict. Actual outcomes and results couldmay differ materially from thosewhat is expressed, implied or forecast by our forward-looking statements due in part to the risks, uncertainties and assumptions set forth below in forward-looking statements. We intend these forward-looking statements to speak only at the timePart I, Item 1A, Risk Factors of this report, and do not undertake to update or revise these statements as more information becomes available except as required under federal securities laws and the rules and regulations of the SEC. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, fluctuations in availability and cost of green coffee, competition, organizational changes, the impact of a weaker economy, business conditions in the coffee industry and food industry in general, our continued success in attracting new customers, variances from budgeted sales mix and growth rates, weather and special or unusual events, changes in the quality or dividend stream of third parties’ securities and other investment vehicles in which we have invested our assets, as well as other risks describedthose discussed elsewhere in this report and other factors described from time to time in our filings with the SEC. Reference is made in particular to forward-looking statements regarding construction, relocation to and operation of our new Texas facility, the timing and success of our relocation plan, product sales, expenses, earnings per share (EPS), and liquidity and capital resources. We intend these forward-looking statements to speak only at the date of this report and do not undertake to update or revise these statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, changes in assumptions or otherwise, except as required under federal securities laws and the rules and regulations of the SEC.






PART I
Item 1.Business
Overview
Farmer Bros. Co., a Delaware corporation (including its consolidated subsidiaries unless the context otherwise requires, the “Company,” “we,” “us,” “our” or “Farmer Bros.”), is a manufacturer,national coffee roaster, wholesaler and distributor of coffee, tea and culinary products. We areserve a direct distributorwide variety of coffeecustomers, from small independent restaurants and foodservice operators to restaurants,large institutional buyers like restaurant and convenience store chains, hotels, casinos, offices, quick service restaurants ("QSR's"), convenience stores, healthcare facilitieshospitals, and other foodservice providers,gourmet coffee houses, as well as grocery chains with private brand retailers in the QSR, grocery, drugstore, restaurant, convenience store, and independentconsumer-branded coffee house channels.products. With a robust product line, including organic, Direct Trade, Direct Trade Verified Sustainable coffees or DTVS and other sustainably-produced coffees, iced and hot teas, cappuccino, spices, and baking/biscuit mixes, among others, we offer a comprehensive approach to our customers by providing not only a breadth of high-quality products, but also value-added services such as market insight, beverage planning, and equipment placement and service. We were founded in 1912, were incorporated in California in 1923, and reincorporated in Delaware in 2004. We operate in one business segment.
Business StrategyCorporate Relocation
In an effort to make the Company more competitive and better positioned to capitalize on growth opportunities, in fiscal 2015 we began the process of relocating our corporate headquarters, product development lab, and manufacturing and distribution operations from Torrance, California to a new facility housing these operations currently under construction in Northlake, Texas (the “New Facility”).
Closure and Sale of the Torrance Facility
We began the process of closing our Torrance facility in the spring of 2015 in phases, as follows:
Our missionManufacturing and Distribution. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015, we transitioned our coffee roasting, grinding and packaging functions from our Torrance, California production facility and consolidated them with our Houston, Texas and Portland, Oregon production facilities, and moved our Houston distribution operations to our Oklahoma City, Oklahoma distribution center.
Corporate Headquarters. During the first half of fiscal 2016, we transferred our primary administrative offices from Torrance to temporary leased offices in Fort Worth, Texas near the New Facility, including the transfer or new hire of approximately 140 employees.
Sale of Spice Assets. In order to focus on our core product offerings, in the second quarter of fiscal 2016, we completed the sale of certain assets associated with our manufacture, processing and distribution of raw, processed and blended spices and certain other culinary products (collectively, the “Spice Assets”) to Harris Spice Company Inc. (“Harris”). We provided certain post-closing transition services to Harris which concluded during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016. The sale of the Spice Assets does not represent a strategic shift for us and is not expected to “sell greathave a material impact on our results of operations because we will continue to sell a complete portfolio of spice and other culinary products purchased from Harris under a supply agreement to our direct-store-delivery, or DSD, customers.
Sale of the Torrance Facility. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016, we entered into a purchase and sale agreement to sell the Torrance facility. Subsequent to the fiscal year end, the sale of the Torrance facility closed on July 15, 2016. We have agreed to lease back the Torrance facility on a triple net basis through October 31, 2016, subject to two one-month extensions, at our option. As of June 30, 2016, the Torrance facility continued to house certain administrative functions and serve as a distribution facility and branch warehouse pending transition of the remaining Torrance operations to our other facilities.
Construction of the New Facility
In the first quarter of fiscal 2016, we entered into a lease agreement, (as amended the "Lease Agreement"), for the New Facility to be constructed by the lessor, at its expense. The Lease Agreement included an option to purchase the New Facility at a purchase price based on a percentage of the total project cost as of the closing date. In the fourth quarter of


fiscal 2016, we exercised the purchase option to acquire the partially constructed New Facility with a targeted closing date in the first quarter of fiscal 2017. Construction of and relocation to the New Facility are expected to be completed in the third quarter of fiscal 2017.
Products
We are a national coffee roaster, wholesaler and distributor of coffee, tea and culinary products and provide superior service—one customer at a time.” We reach our customers in two ways: through our nationwide Direct-Store-Delivery (“DSD”) network of approximately 500 delivery routes, 117 branch warehouses and six distribution centers, and by using the distribution channels of our national account and institutional customers. We differentiate ourselves in the marketplace through our customer service model. We offer value-added services to our foodservice customers, including beverage equipment service, menu solutions, wherein we recommend products, how these products are prepared in the kitchen and presented on the menu, and hassle-free inventory and product procurement management. These services are conducted primarily in person through Regional Sales Representatives, or RSR’s, who develop personal relationships with chefs, restaurant owners and food buyers at their drop off locations. We also provide comprehensive coffee programs, including private brand development, green coffee procurement, category management, andmanufactured under supply chain management to our national account customers.
Since 2007, Farmer Bros. has achieved growth, primarily through the acquisition in 2007 of Coffee Bean Holding Co., Inc., a Delaware corporation ("CBH"), the parent company of Coffee Bean International, Inc., an Oregon corporation (“CBI”), a specialty coffee manufacturer and wholesaler headquartered in Portland, Oregon, and the acquisition in 2009 from Sara Lee Corporation (“Sara Lee”) of certain assets used in connection with its DSD coffee business in the United States (the “DSD Coffee Business”).
We manufacture and distribute productsagreements, under our ownowned brands, as well as under private labels on behalf of certain customers. Our branded products are sold primarily into the foodservice channel. Primary brands include Farmer Brothers®, Artisan Collection by Farmer Brothers™, Superior®, Metropolitan™ by Farmer Brothers, Cain's® and McGarvey®. Our product line is specifically focused on meeting the needscategories consist of the markets we serve. Our productfollowing:
a robust line of approximately 3,500 SKU's (excluding private label), includes roastedroast and ground coffee, including organic, Direct Trade, DTVS and other sustainably-produced offerings;
frozen liquid coffee, coffee-related products such as coffee filters, sugarcoffee;
flavored and creamers, assortedunflavored iced and hot teas, cappuccino, cocoa, spices,teas;
culinary products including gelatins and puddings, soup bases, dressings, gravy and sauce mixes, pancake and biscuit mixes, and jellies and preserves. Forpreserves, and coffee-related products such as coffee filters, sugar and creamers;
spices; and
other beverages including cappuccino, cocoa, granitas, and ready-to-drink iced coffee.
Our owned brand products are sold primarily into the past three fiscal years, sales of roastedfoodservice channel. Our primary brands include Farmer Brothers™, Artisan Collection by Farmer Brothers™, Superior® and Metropolitan™. Our Artisan coffee products represented approximately 50% of our total salesinclude Direct Trade, Fair Trade Certified™, Rainforest Alliance Certified™, organic and no single product other than roastedproprietary blends. In addition, we sell whole bean and roast and ground flavored and unflavored coffee accounted for more than 10% of our total sales.
Coffee purchasing, grinding, roasting,products under the Un Momento®,Collaborative Coffee™, Cain's™ and McGarvey® brands at retail. Our roast and ground coffee products are sold in traditional packaging, including bags and product development takes place at our Torrance, California; Portland, Oregon; and Houston, Texas plants. Spice blending, grinding, packaging and product development takes place at our Torrance, California plant. Our distribution centers include our Torrance, Portland and Houston plants,fractional packages, as well as separatesingle-serve packaging. For a description of the amount of net sales attributed to each of our product categories in fiscal 2016, 2015 and 2014, see Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations—Results of Operations included in Part II, Item 7 of this report.
Business Strategy
Overview
We develop great tasting products delivered with concierge service with the goal of a positive impact on our customers and the planet. Through our sustainability, stewardship, environmental efforts, and leadership we are not only committed to serving the finest products available, considering the cost needs of the customer, but also insist on their sustainable cultivation, manufacture and distribution centerswhenever possible.
In order to achieve our mission, we have had to grow existing capabilities and develop new ones over the years. More recently, we have undertaken initiatives such as, but not limited to, the following:
develop new products in Northlake, Illinois; Oklahoma City, Oklahoma;response to demographic and Moonachie, New Jersey. Farmer Bros. was among the firstother trends to better compete in areas such as premium coffee roastersand tea;
rethink aspects of our Company culture to improve productivity and employee engagement and to attract talent;
embrace sustainability across our operations, in the nation to receive SCAA-certificationquality of our products, as well as, how we treat our coffee growers; and
ensure our systems and processes provide the highest quality products at a state-of-the-art coffee labcompetitive cost, protection from cyber-risk, and operates Public Domain®, a specialty coffeehouse in Portland, Oregon. The Portland roastingsafe environment for our employees and distribution facility was one of the firstpartners.
We differentiate ourselves in the Northwestmarketplace through our product offerings and through our customer service model, which includes:
a wide variety of coffee product offerings and packaging options across numerous brands and quality tiers;


beverage equipment placement and service;
hassle-free inventory and product procurement management;
DSD service;
merchandising support; and
product and menu insights.
Our services are conducted primarily in person through Route Sales Representatives, or RSRs, who develop personal relationships with chefs, restaurant owners and food buyers at their delivery locations. We also provide comprehensive coffee programs to achieve LEED® Silver Certification.our national account customers, including private brand development, green coffee procurement, hedging, category management, sustainable sourcing and supply chain management.
We are focused on distributingdistribute our owned brands primarily through our DSD network, while continuing to support and grow our private brandlabel and other national account customers. Tobusiness. Although currently a small portion of our distribution, we also distribute directly to consumers through our website and sell certain products such as Un Momento®, Collaborative Coffee™, Cain's™ and McGarvey® at retail.
Strategic Initiatives
We are focused on the following strategies to reduce costs, streamline our supply chain, improve the breadth of products and services we provide value to our currentcustomers, and potential customers,better position the Company to attract new customers:
Reduce Costs to Compete More Effectively
New Facility. In fiscal 2015, we have madecommenced work on a corporate relocation plan to replace our aging production facility in Torrance, California with a more efficient, state-of-the-art facility to be located in Northlake, Texas. We undertook this endeavor, in part, to pursue improved production efficiency to allow us to provide a more cost-competitive offering of high-quality products. We believe the following investments:expected improvements in production efficiency, combined with the wind-down and sale of our Torrance facility, should allow us to operate at a lower cost, generally.
Third-Party Logistics. During the second half of fiscal 2016, we replaced our long-haul fleet operations with third-party logistics ("3PL"). We expect that this transportation arrangement will reduce our fuel consumption and empty trailer miles, while improving our intermodal and trailer cube utilization.
Vendor Managed Inventory. During the second half of fiscal 2016, we entered into a vendor managed inventory arrangement with a third party. We anticipate that the use of vendor managed inventory arrangements will result in a reduction in raw material, finished goods and logistics costs, while improving packaging innovation and fulfillment.
Warehouse Management. Subsequent to the fiscal year end, we entered into an agreement with a third party to provide warehouse management services for our New Facility.  We expect the warehouse management services to facilitate cost savings by leveraging the third party's expertise in opening new facilities, implementing lean management practices, improving performance on certain key performance metrics, and standardizing best practices.
Optimize Sales, Pricing and Portfolio of Products
Pricing and Products. In fiscal 2016, we built capability to more strategically optimize our pricing strategy across product, channel, customer and geographic segments. This process is designed to improve our average margins as well as retention rates. In addition, we continued our prior work optimizing SKU count and identifying opportunities to consolidate suppliers to improve costs and supply chain efficiency.
DSD Reorganization. During the second half of fiscal 2016, we began to realign our DSD organization by undertaking initiatives intended to streamline communication and decision making, enhance branch organizational structure, and improve customer focus, including initiatives toward a comprehensive training program for all DSD team members to strengthen customer engagement.


Artisan Collection by Farmer Brothers™Accelerate Customer Acquisition Efforts.: In fiscal 2016, we executed a regional test of our first advertising and lead generation campaign designed to improve our new customer acquisition rate within our DSD network.
Strategic Investment in Assets and Evaluation of Cost Structure
A recently-created specialty coffee line, establishesAsset Utilization. We continue to look for ways to deploy our personnel, systems, assets and infrastructure to create or enhance stockholder value. Areas of focus have included corporate staffing and structure, methods of procurement, logistics, inventory management, supporting technology, and real estate assets.
Branch Consolidation and Property Sales. In an owned brand presenceeffort to streamline our branch operations, in the growing specialtyfourth quarter of fiscal 2016, we sold two Northern California branch properties, with a third Northern California property under contract for sale, and we acquired a new branch facility in Hayward, California.
Acquisitions. One of our investment priorities is exploring acquisitions that we believe will enhance long-term stockholder value and complement or enhance our product, equipment, service and/or distribution offerings to existing and new customer bases. For example, on September 9, 2016, through a newly-formed, wholly-owned subsidiary, we entered into an asset purchase agreement to acquire substantially all of the assets of China Mist Brands, Inc., dba China Mist Tea Company ("China Mist") for an aggregate purchase price of $11.3 million, with $10.8 million to be paid in cash at closing and $0.5 million to be paid as earnout if certain sales levels are achieved in the calendar years of 2017 and 2018. The transaction is expected to close during the second quarter of fiscal 2017. We anticipate that the acquisition of China Mist will give us a greater presence in the high-growth premium tea industry. See Note 24, Subsequent Events, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this report.
Corporate Capabilities and Alignment to Create Stockholder Value
Investment in Human Resources. In fiscal 2016, we hired Isaac N. Johnston, Jr. as our Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer and Carolyn Suzanne Gargis as our VP of Human Relations. Each of these individuals brings a proven track record at both large consumer packaged goods operations as well as experience in dealing with smaller and more entrepreneurial companies. In addition, in fiscal 2016, we continued to emphasize greater alignment of employee individual goals with Company goals under our compensation plans in order to focus the entire organization on the effort to create value for our stockholders.
Drive High-Growth Product Categories and Address Broader Customer Needs
Introduction of Collaborative Coffee™ and Redesign of Un Momento®Branded Retail Products. In an effort to address what we believe to be unmet consumer needs and improve margin within the retail grocery environment, in fiscal 2016 we launched the Collaborative Coffee brand into the retail grocery channel and completed a packaging redesign and product portfolio optimization of our Un Momento® retail branded product line. Collaborative Coffee™ offers coffee enthusiasts a super-premium, verified direct trade coffee at an approachable price. Un Momento® delivers Millennial Hispanic consumers appealing flavor variety and premium coffee at an exceptional value.
Expand Sustainability Leadership
Sustainability. We believe that our collective efforts in measuring our social and environmental impact, creating programs for waste, water and energy reduction, promoting partnerships in our supply chain that aim at supply chain stability and food security, and focusing on employee engagement place us in a unique position to help retailers and foodservice operators create differentiated coffee market, leveraging the blending, roastingprograms that can include sustainable supply chains, direct trade purchasing, training and technical assistance, recycling and composting networks, and packaging capabilitiesmaterial reductions. During fiscal 2016, we submitted our second third-party verified Carbon Disclosure Project survey for Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions (direct emissions, indirect emissions from consumption of our Portland facility. Many ofpurchased electricity, heat or steam and other indirect emissions). Further, we published a sustainability report based on the coffees within the line are either Rainforest Alliance Certified™ or Fair Trade Certified™ and Certified Organic.Global Reporting Initiative’s compliance standard.
LEED® Certified Facilities. Our Portland production and distribution facility was one of the first in the Northwest to achieve LEED® Silver Certification. We anticipate that our corporate offices at the New Facility will also be LEED® certified.


Metropolitan™ by Farmer BrothersExpansion of Direct Trade Verified Sustainable Program.:One In fiscal 2016, we completed our first third-party audit and verification of our core brandsDTVS program for sourcing green coffee. DTVS is an impact-based product or raw material sourcing framework that utilizes data-based sustainability metrics to influence an inclusive, collaborative approach to sustainability along the supply chain. To evaluate whether coffee is DTVS, we follow an outcome-based evaluation framework. The outcome of this evaluation weighs on where we invest our resources within our supply chain and has led to an increased level of transparency for us. DTVS represents a premiumgrowing percentage of our coffee line, Metropolitan, has been updated and re-launched. Metropolitan includes a complete line of coffees from exotic single-origins, classic blends, flavoredportfolio.

1



coffees and premium espressos. Metropolitan products are made from 100% Arabica beans that are roasted to offer peak flavor and freshness and are offered in a new contemporary packaging.

Farmer Brothers icedGreen Coffee Traceability. We are committed to the inclusion of more sustainably-sourced coffees in our supply chain. Regulatory and hot teasreputational risks can increase when customers, roasters and suppliers cannot see back into their supply chain. To address these concerns, as well as to deepen our commitment to the longevity of the coffee industry, in fiscal 2016 we began requiring our immediate suppliers of green coffee to enhance their reporting of traceability information on each lot of coffee sold to us.:
Charitable Activities
We launchedview charitable involvement as a part of our new linecorporate responsibility and sustainability model: Social, Environmental, and Economic Development, or SEED. We endorse and support communities where our customers, employees, businesses, and suppliers are located, and who have enthusiastically supported us over the past 100 years. Our objective is to provide support toward a mission of Premiumsupply chain stability with a focus on food security.
Recipient organizations include those with strong local and Select teas in May 2013 in responseregional networks that ensure that families have access to keynutritious food. Donations may take the form of corporate cash contributions, product donations, employee volunteerism, and workplace giving (with or without matching contributions).
Recipient organizations include Feeding America, Mercy Corps, Ronald McDonald House, and local food banks.
We support industry trends and growing consumer demand. Iced tea blends include flavored teasorganizations such as Georgia PeachWorld Coffee Research, which commits to grow, protect, and Pacific Raspberry™, a varietyenhance supplies of traditional black teas, sweet teasquality coffee while improving the livelihoods of the families who produce it, and decaffeinated teas. Hot teas include black leaf and green teas and herbal teas, which are naturally caffeine-free.

Unified brand:We have further developed and strengthened a unified corporate identity for our branded business nationwide that is reflected in our updated website, many of our fleet vehicles, product packaging and merchandising and sales materials.

Optimized portfolio:In fiscal 2013, we continued to optimize and simplify our product portfolio, discontinuing over 800 SKU's to approximately 3,500 SKU's.

Service improvements: We have invested in sales and training for all of our RSR's, allowing us to expand the role we play as beverage consultants for our DSD customers.

We have also made the following investments to support our private brand national account business:

Coffee industry leadership: Through our dedication to the craft of sourcing, blending and roasting coffee, and our leadership positions with the Specialty Coffee Association of America World Coffee Research, Pacific Coast Coffee Association, Alliance("SCAA") Sustainability Council and the Coalition for Coffee Excellence, Roasters Guild, International Women's Coffee AllianceCommunities, which are focused on sustainability in coffee growing regions.
Our employee-driven CAFÉ Crew organizes employee involvement at local charities and fund raisers, including running in the Coffee Quality Institute,Chicago Marathon in support of Team Ronald McDonald House, riding in the Ride Against Hunger supported by Tarrant Area Food Bank, supporting delivery for Meals on Wheels, and hosting local food drives.
All of our usable and near expiring products or products with damaged packaging are donated to Feeding America affiliated food banks nationwide, in an effort to fully eliminate edible food waste from the landfill.
Industry and Market Leadership
We have made the following investments in an effort to ensure we work to help shape the future of the coffee industry. We believe that due to our commitment toare well-positioned within the industry to take advantage of category trends, industry insights, and general coffee and tea knowledge to grow our leadership role in shaping the industry's future, large retail and foodservice operators are drawn to working with us.business:

Coffee Industry Leadership. Through our dedication to the craft of sourcing, blending and roasting coffee, and our participation and/or leadership positions with the SCAA, National Coffee Association, Coalition for Coffee Communities, International Women's Coffee Alliance, International Foodservice Manufacturers Association, Pacific Coast Coffee Association, Roasters Guild and World Coffee Research, we work to help shape the future of the coffee industry. We believe that due to our commitment to the industry, large retail and foodservice operators are drawn to working with us. We were among the first coffee roasters in the nation to receive SCAA certification of a state-of-the-art coffee lab and operate Public Domain®, a specialty coffeehouse in Portland, Oregon. Upon completion, we plan to submit our product development lab at the New Facility for SCAA certification.
Market insightInsight and consumer research: Consumer Research.We have developed a market insight capability internally that reinforces our business-to-business positioning as a thought leader in the coffee industry. We provide trend insights that help our customers create winning products and integrated marketing strategies for their own coffee brands.


Sustainability leadership: We believe that our efforts in measuring our emissionsWithin this, we are focused on understanding key demographic groups such as Millennials and waste, creating programs for wasteHispanics, and energy reduction, promoting partnerships in our supply chain that aim at stability and food security, and focusing on employee engagement collectively place us in a unique position to help retailers and foodservice operators create differentiated coffee programs that can include sustainable supply chains, direct trade purchasing, training and technical assistance, recycling and composting networks, and packaging material reductions.
key channel trends.
Raw Materials and Supplies
Our primary raw material is green coffee, an agricultural commodity.commodity traded on the Commodities and Futures Exchange that is subject to price fluctuations. Over the past five years, coffee “C” market price per pound ranged from approximately $1.02 to $2.90. The bulkcoffee “C” market price as of June 30, 2016 and 2015 was $1.46 and $1.32 per pound, respectively. Our principal packaging materials include cartonboard, corrugated and plastic. We also use a significant amount of electricity, natural gas, and other energy sources to operate our production and distribution facilities.
We purchase green coffee beans from multiple coffee regions around the world. Although coffee “C” market prices in fiscal 2016 were relatively low compared to historical levels, there can be no assurance that green coffee prices will remain at these levels in the future. Some of the world'sArabica coffee beans we purchase do not trade directly on the commodity markets. Rather, we purchase these coffee beans on a negotiated basis from coffee brokers, exporters and growers, including Direct Trade, DTVS and Fair Trade Certified™ sources and Rainforest Alliance Certified™ farms. Fair Trade Certified™ provides an assurance that farmer groups are receiving the Fair Trade minimum price and an additional premium for certified organic products through arrangements with cooperatives. Direct Trade and DTVS products provide similar assurance except that the arrangements are provided directly to farmers instead of through cooperatives in an effort to promote investment in better and more sustainable farming practices as well as to ensure a fairer price. Rainforest Alliance Certified™ coffee is grown using methods that help promote and preserve biodiversity, conserve scarce natural resources, and help farmers build sustainable lives. Our business model strives to reduce the impact of green coffee supply is grownprice fluctuations on our financial results and to protect and stabilize our margins, principally through customer arrangements and derivative instruments, as further explained in Note 7, Derivative Instruments, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this report.
Intellectual Property
We own a number of United States trademarks and service marks that have been registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. We also own other trademarks and service marks for which we have filed applications for U.S. registration. We have licenses to use certain trademarks outside of the United States and can beto certain product formulas, all subject to volatile price fluctuations. Weather, real or perceived supply shortages, speculation in the commodity markets, political unrest, tariffs, labor actions, currency fluctuations, armed conflict in coffee producing nations,terms of the agreements under which such licenses are granted. We believe our trademarks and government actions, including treaties and trade controls between the U.S. and coffee producing nations can affect the price of green coffee. Additionally, green specialty coffees sell at a premium to other green coffees because they taste cleaner, fresher, have less overall defects, offer improved cup quality and cost more to produce. The cost spread between specialty and non-specialty coffees is widening as the demand for specialty coffees continues to grow with only a limited supply to satisfy the demand and thus cost volatility can be expected to be even more pronounced.
Green coffee prices can also be affected by the actions of producer organizations. The most prominent of these are the Colombian Coffee Federation, Inc. (CCF) and the International Coffee Organization (ICO). Large coffee organizations such as larger producers, the CCF and the ICO may release information from time to time that can affect coffee prices.
Other raw materials used in the manufacture of our tea and culinary products include a wide variety of spices, such as pepper, chilies, oregano and thyme, as well as cocoa, dehydrated milk products, salt and sugar. These raw materials are agricultural products and can be subject to wide cost fluctuations. In fiscal 2011 and in the first half of fiscal 2012, fluctuations in commodity prices, specifically green coffee commodity prices, had a material effect on our operating results.

2



Trademarks and Licenses
We own 161 registered trademarks whichservice marks are integral to customer identification of our products. It is not possible to assess the impact of the loss of such identification. Additionally,Depending on the jurisdiction, trademarks are generally valid as long as they are in connection withuse and/or their registrations are properly maintained and they have not been found to have become generic. Registrations of trademarks can also generally be renewed indefinitely as long as the DSD Coffee Business acquisition, the Companytrademarks are in use. In addition, we own numerous copyrights, registered and Sara Lee entered into certain operational agreementsunregistered, registered domain names, and proprietary trade secrets, technology, know-how processes and other proprietary rights that include trademark and formula license agreements. In February 2012, the trademark agreements and formula license agreements with Sara Lee were assigned to the J.M. Smucker Company ("J.M. Smucker") as part of an acquisition transaction between J.M. Smucker and Sara Lee.are not registered.
Seasonality
We experience some seasonal influences. The winter months are generally the strongest sales months. However, our product line and geographic diversity provide some sales stability during the warmer months when coffee consumption ordinarily decreases. Additionally, we usually experience an increase in sales during the summer and early fall months from seasonal businesses located in vacation areas and from grocery retailers ramping up inventory for the winter selling season. Because of the seasonality of our business, results for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be achieved for the full fiscal year.
Distribution
MostWe operate production facilities in Portland, Oregon and Houston, Texas. Distribution takes place out of our Portland facility as well as three separate distribution centers in Northlake, Illinois; Oklahoma City, Oklahoma; and Moonachie, New Jersey. As of June 30, 2016, the Torrance facility continued to house certain administrative functions and serve as a distribution facility and branch warehouse pending transition of the remaining Torrance operations to our other facilities. Upon completion, the New Facility will serve as a production facility and distribution center for our products. Our products reach our customers primarily in two ways: through our nationwide DSD network of 450 delivery routes and 109 branch warehouses as of June 30, 2016, or direct-shipped via common carriers or third-party distributors.


DSD sales are made “off-truck” to our customers at their places of business by our RSR'sRSRs who generally are responsible for soliciting, selling and collecting from and otherwise maintaining our customer accounts. We serve our customers from six distribution centers strategically located for national coverage. Our distribution trucks are replenished from 117 branch warehouses located throughout the contiguous United States.DSD business includes office coffee services whereby we provide office coffee products, including a variety of coffee brands and blends, brewing and beverage equipment, and foodservice supplies directly to offices. We operate a large fleet of trucks and other vehicles to distribute and deliver our own trucking fleet to supportproducts, and we rely on 3PL service providers for our long-haul distribution requirements. A portion of our products is distributed by third parties or is direct shipped via common carrier.distribution. We maintain inventory levels at each branch warehouse to promote minimal interruption in supply. We also sell directly to consumers through our website.
Customers
We serve a wide variety of customers, from small independent restaurants and donut shopsfoodservice operators to large institutional buyers like restaurant and convenience store chains, hotels, casinos, hospitals, foodservice providers, convenience stores,and gourmet coffee houses, bakery/caféas well as grocery chains national drugstore chains, large regionalwith private brand and national grocery and specialty food retailers, QSR's and gaming establishments. Within our DSD channel, we believe on-premise customer contact, our large distribution network, and our relationship-based high quality service model are integral to our past and future success.consumer-branded coffee products. Although no single customer represents a significant concentrationaccounted for 10% or more of our net sales in any of the last three fiscal years, we have several large national account customers, and the loss of or reduction in sales to one or more of our large customer accounts iswhich would be likely to have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
Competition
We face competition from many sources, including the institutional foodservice divisions of multi-national manufacturers of retail products such as J.M. Smucker (Folgers Coffee), Dunkin' Donuts and Kraft Foods Inc. (Maxwell House Coffee), wholesale foodservice distributors such as Sysco Corporation and U.S. Foods, regional institutional coffee roasters such as S & D Coffee, Inc. and Boyd Coffee Company, and specialty coffee suppliers such as Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc., Rogers Family Company, Distant Lands Coffee, Mother Parkers Tea & Coffee, Inc., Starbucks Coffee Company and Peet’s Coffee & Tea, Inc. As many During fiscal 2016, our top five customers accounted for approximately 19% of our customers are small foodservice operators, we also compete with club stores such as Costco and Restaurant Depot. We believe our longevity, the quality of our products, our national distribution network and our comprehensive and superior customer service are the major factors that differentiate us from our competitors.net sales.
Competition is robust and is primarily based on products and price, with distribution and service often a major factor. Most of our customers rely on us for distribution; however, some of our customers use third partythird-party distribution or conduct their own distribution. Some of our customers are “price” buyers, seeking the low costlow-cost provider with little concern about service, while others find great value in the service programs we provide. We offer a full return policy to ensure satisfaction and extended terms for those customers who qualify.
Competition
The coffee industry is highly competitive, including with respect to price, product quality, service, convenience and innovation, and competition could become increasingly more intense due to the relatively low barriers to entry. We face competition from many sources, including the institutional foodservice divisions of multi-national manufacturers of retail products many of which have greater financial and other resources than we do, such as The J.M. Smucker Company (Folgers Coffee), Dunkin' Brands Group, Inc., The Kraft Heinz Company (Maxwell House Coffee) and Massimo Zanetti Beverage, wholesale foodservice distributors such as Sysco Corporation and US Foods, regional institutional coffee roasters such as S&D Coffee & Tea (Cott Corporation) and Boyd Coffee Company, and specialty coffee suppliers such as Keurig Green Mountain, Inc., Rogers Family Company, Distant Lands Coffee, Mother Parkers Tea & Coffee Inc., Starbucks Corporation and Peet’s Coffee & Tea. As many of our customers are small foodservice operators, we also compete with cash and carry and club stores (physical and on-line) such as Costco, Sam’s Club and Restaurant Depot and on-line retailers such as Amazon. We also face competition from growth in the single-serve, ready-to-drink coffee beverage and cold-brewed coffee channels, as well as competition from other beverages, such as soft drinks (including highly caffeinated energy drinks), juices, bottled water, teas and other beverages.
We believe our longevity, product quality and offerings, national distribution network, coffee industry and sustainability leadership, market insight, comprehensive approach to customer relationship management, and superior customer service are the major factors that differentiate us from our competitors. We compete well when quality, service and distributionthese factors are valued by our customers, and we are less effective when only price matters. Our customer base is price sensitive, and we are often faced with price competition.
Working Capital
We finance our operations internally and through borrowings under our existing credit facility. For a description of our liquidity and capital resources, see Results of Operations and Liquidity, Capital Resources and Financial Conditionincluded in Part II, Item 7 of this report and Note 18, $75.0 millionOther Current Liabilities senior secured revolving credit facility which is administered by Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (“Wells Fargo”). We believe, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this credit facility, toreport. Our working capital needs are greater in the extent available, in additionmonths leading up to our peak sales period during the winter months, which we typically finance with cash flows from operationsoperations. In anticipation of our peak sales period, we typically increase inventory in the first quarter of the fiscal year. We use various techniques including demand forecasting and other liquid assets, are sufficientplanning to fund our working capital and capital expenditure requirementsdetermine appropriate inventory levels for the next 12 months.seasonal demand.
Foreign Operations
We have no material revenues from foreign operations.

3



OtherRegulatory Environment
The conduct of our businesses, including, among other things, the production, storage, distribution, sale, labeling, quality and safety of our products, and occupational safety and health practices, are subject to various laws and regulations administered by federal, state and local governmental agencies in the United States. Our facilities are subject to various laws and regulations regarding the release of material into the environment and the protection of the environment in other ways. We are not a party to any material legal proceedings arising under these regulations except as described in Note 22, Commitments and Contingencies, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this report.
Employees
On June 30, 20132016, we employed 1,7931,634 employees, 622508 of whom are subject to collective bargaining agreements. Compliance with government regulations relating to the discharge of materials into the environment, or otherwise relating to protection of the environment, has not had a material effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
Other
The nature of our business does not provide for maintenance of or reliance upon a sales backlog. None of our business is subject to renegotiation of profits or termination of contracts or subcontracts at the election of the government. We have no material revenues from foreign operations or long-lived assets located in foreign countries.
Available Information
Our Internet website address is http://www.farmerbros.com (the website address is not intended to function as a hyperlink, and the information contained in our website is not intended to be part of this filing), where we make available, free of charge, through a link maintained on our website under the heading “Investor Relations—SEC Filings,” copies of our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K, including amendments thereto, as soon as reasonably practicable after filing such material electronically or otherwise furnishing it to the SEC. Copies of our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Charters of the Audit, Compensation, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees of the Board of Directors, and our Code of Conduct and Ethics can also be found on our website.

4




Item 1A.Risk Factors
You should carefully consider each of the following factors, as well as the other information in this report, including our consolidated financial statements and the related notes, in evaluating our business and our prospects. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently consider immaterial may also negatively affect our business operations. If any of the following risks actually occurs, our business and financial results could be harmed. In that case, the trading price of our common stock could decline.
THE RESTATEMENT OF OUR HISTORICAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS HAS ALREADY CONSUMED, AND MAY CONTINUE TO CONSUME, A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF OUR TIME AND RESOURCES AND MAY HAVE A MATERIAL ADVERSE EFFECT ON OUR BUSINESS AND STOCK PRICE.
As discussed in Note 2, “Restatement,” and Note 19, “Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited),” ofRelocation to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K,New Facility may be unsuccessful or less successful than we have restated in this Form 10-K our consolidated financial statements for certain prior periods to correct certain errors in those financial statements. The errors related to our accounting for certain postretirement benefit obligations for our retiree medical plan, failure to timely adopt accounting guidance relating to a postretirement death benefit, when originally issued, and failure to record the appropriate amounts reflecting the cash surrender value of life insurance policies purchased to fund the postretirement death benefit.

We cannot be certain that the measures we have taken since we completed the restatement process will ensure that restatements will not occur in the future. The restatementpresently anticipate, which may adversely affect investor confidence in the accuracy of our financial disclosures, may raise reputational issues for our business, operating results and may result in a decline in share price and stockholder lawsuits related to the restatement. The restatement process was resource-intensive and involved a significant amount of internal resources, including attention from management, and significant accounting costs. Although we have now completed the restatement, wefinancial condition.
We cannot guarantee that we will not receive inquiries frombe successful in implementing the SEC or The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (“NASDAQ”) regarding our restated financial statements or matters relating thereto. Any future inquiries from the SEC or NASDAQ as a result of the restatement of our historical financial statements will, regardless of the outcome, likely consume a significant amount of our internal resources and result in additional legal and accounting costs.

WE CANNOT ASSURE INVESTORS THAT WE WILL BE ABLE TO FULLY ADDRESS THE MATERIAL WEAKNESS IN OUR INTERNAL CONTROLS THAT LED TO OUR RESTATEMENT, OR THAT REMEDIATION EFFORTS WILL PREVENT MATERIAL WEAKNESSES IN THE FUTURE.

We have identified control deficiencies in our financial reporting process that constituted a material weakness in our controls over our accounting for and reporting of other postretirement benefit obligations, leadingrelocation to the restatement of certain prior periodNew Facility in accordance with our expectations, in a timely manner or at all, which may adversely impact our business, operating results and financial statements. Specifically, our controls did not properly identify the failure to apply generally accepted accounting principles with respectcondition. Relocation to the accounting for death benefitsNew Facility could disrupt our supply chain and the related cash surrender value of life insurance, and did not properly detect when changes or amendmentsongoing operations, which could adversely affect our ability to other postretirement benefit plans occurred that should have resulted in changes to the related benefit plan obligations. As a result, material errors to the recorded postretirement benefit liability, postretirement death benefit liability and cash surrender value of life insurance purchased to fund the postretirement death benefit occurred and were not timely detected.

We are currently evaluating the controls and procedures we will design and put in place to address this material weakness and plan to implement appropriate measures as part of this effort. If we are unsuccessful in remediating the material weakness, or if we suffer other deficiencies or material weaknesses in the future, it could result in a material misstatement of our annual or quarterly financial statements that would not be prevented or detecteddeliver products both on a timely basis and in accordance with customer requirements, the effect of which could cause investorsdelay revenues or result in lost business opportunities. Our existing production facilities in Portland and Houston have been operating at much higher utilization rates than they have historically pending completion of the New Facility. In the event of significant increases in demand that precede the completion of and relocation to lose confidencethe New Facility, we may be required to increase staffing, including through temporary labor and overtime, use third-party manufacturers, lease additional production facilities, or some combination of those alternatives or others to satisfy demand. There can be no assurance that we would be able to identify appropriate third-party providers on a timely basis or at all. In addition, our success depends, in large part, on our financial reportingability to attract and negatively affectretain skilled people. Competition for the trading pricebest people in many of our common stock.key positions may be intense, and we may not be able to attract and retain sufficiently skilled people at the New Facility. Costs associated with the exit from our Torrance facility and the construction and relocation to, and operation of, the New Facility may exceed our expectations, which could interfere with our ability to achieve our business objectives or could cause us to incur indebtedness in amounts in excess of expectations. In addition, failure to satisfy the conditions of governmental incentives relating to the New Facility could result in higher than expected costs.

INCREASES IN THE COST OF GREEN COFFEE COULD REDUCE OUR GROSS MARGIN AND PROFIT.Increases in the cost of green coffee could reduce our gross margin and profit.
Our primary raw material is green coffee, an agricultural commodity. The bulk ofcommodity traded on the world's green coffee supplyCommodities and Futures Exchange that is grown outside the United States and can be subject to volatile price fluctuations. Weather, real or perceived supply shortages, speculationAlthough coffee “C” market prices in the commodity markets, political unrest, tariffs, labor actions, currency fluctuations, armed conflict in coffee producing nations, and government actions, including treaties and trade controls between the U.S. and coffee producing nations, can affect the price of green coffee. In fiscal 2012, the market for green Arabica coffee increased approximately 80% per pound2016 were relatively low compared to the prior fiscal year. Although green coffee prices decreased significantly in fiscal 2013,historical levels, there can be no assurance that green coffee prices will remain at these levels in the future. Additionally,The supply and price of green specialty coffees sell at a

5



premium tocoffee may be impacted by, among other green coffees because they taste cleaner, fresher, have less overall defects, offer improved cup qualitythings, weather, natural disasters, real or perceived supply shortages, crop disease (such as coffee rust) and cost more to produce. The cost spread between specialtypests, general increase in farm inputs and non-specialty coffees is widening as the demand for specialty coffees continues to grow with only a limited supply to satisfy the demandcosts of production, political and thus cost volatility can be expected to be even more pronounced.
Greeneconomic conditions, labor actions, foreign currency fluctuations, armed conflict in coffee prices can also be affected byproducing nations, acts of terrorism, government actions and trade barriers, and the actions of producer organizations. The most prominentorganizations that have historically attempted to influence green coffee prices through agreements establishing export quotas or by restricting coffee supplies. Speculative trading in coffee commodities can also influence coffee prices. Additionally, specialty green coffees tend to trade on a negotiated basis at a premium above the “C” market price which premium, depending on the supply and demand at the time of these arepurchase, may be significant. Increases in the Colombian Coffee Federation, Inc. (CCF) and“C” market price may also impact our ability to enter into green coffee purchase commitments at a fixed price or at a price to be fixed whereby the International Coffee Organization (ICO). Large coffee organizations such as larger producers,price at which the CCF and the ICO may release information from time to time that can affect coffee prices.
base “C” market price will be fixed has not yet been established. There can be no assurance that weour purchasing practices and hedging activities will mitigate future price risk. As a result, increases in the cost of green coffee could have an adverse impact on our profitability.
Our efforts to secure an adequate supply of quality coffees may be successful in passingunsuccessful and impact our ability to supply our customers or expose us to commodity price increases on to our customers without losses in sales volume or gross margin in the future. Additionally, ifrisk.
Maintaining a steady supply of green coffee beans from a region become unavailable or prohibitively expensive, we could be forcedis essential to use alternative coffee beans or discontinue certain blends, which could adversely impact our sales.
OUR EFFORTS TO SECURE AN ADEQUATE SUPPLY OF QUALITY COFFEES MAY BE UNSUCCESSFUL AND IMPACT OUR ABILITY TO SUPPLY OUR CUSTOMERS OR EXPOSE US TO COMMODITY PRICE RISK.
keeping inventory levels low while securing sufficient stock to meet customer needs. Some of the Arabica coffee beans of the quality we purchase do not trade directly on the commodity markets. Rather, we purchase these coffee beans on a negotiated basis from coffee brokers, exporters and growers. If any of these supply relationships with coffee brokers, exporters or growers deteriorate, we may be unable to procure a sufficient quantity of high high‑quality coffee beans at prices acceptable to us or at all. In such cases, we may not be able to fulfill the demand of our existing customers, supply new customers or expand other channels of distribution.
Maintaining a steady supply of green coffee is essential to be able to keep inventory levels low and, at the same time, secure sufficient stock to meet customer needs. To help ensure future supplies, we may purchase coffee for delivery, in some instances, up to 18 months in the future. Non-performanceFurther, non-performance by suppliers could expose us to credit and supply risk. Additionally, entering intorisk under coffee purchase commitments for delivery in the future. In addition, the political situation in many of the Arabica coffee growing regions, including Africa, Indonesia, and Central and South America, can be unstable, and such future commitments exposes usinstability could affect our


ability to purchase price risk. Becausecoffee from those regions. If green coffee beans from a region become unavailable or prohibitively expensive, we are not always ablecould be forced to pass price changes through touse alternative coffee beans or discontinue certain blends, which could adversely impact our sales. A raw material shortage could result in a deterioration of our relationship with our customers, duedecreased revenues or could impair our ability to competitive pressures, unpredictable price changes can have an immediate effect on operating results that cannotexpand our business.
Changes in green coffee commodity prices may not be correctedimmediately reflected in the short run.
DECLINES IN GREEN COFFEE COMMODITY PRICES MAY NOT BE IMMEDIATELY REFLECTED IN OUR COST OF GOODS SOLD AND MAY INCREASE VOLATILITY IN OUR RESULTS.our cost of goods sold and may increase volatility in our results.
We routinely purchase exchange tradedover-the-counter coffee contractsderivative instruments to enable us to lock in the price of green coffee prices within a pre-established range, and hold a mixcommodity purchases on our behalf or at the direction of futures contracts and options to help hedge against volatility in green coffee prices. Beginning April 1, 2013,our customers under commodity-based pricing arrangements. Although we implemented procedures to enable us to account for certain coffee-related derivativesderivative instruments as accounting hedges. Accounting rules require that athedges, the endportion of each reporting period we value those open hedging contracts that are not 100% effective as cash flow hedges and those that are not designated as accounting hedges by marking themare marked to period-end market price and including in our financial results the unrealized gains or losses based on whether the period-end market price was higher or lower than the price we locked-in.locked-in are recognized in our financial results at the end of each reporting period. If the period-end green coffee commodity prices decline below our locked-inlocked in price for these contracts,derivative instruments, we will be required to recognize the resulting losses in our results of operations. Although such losses are expected to be offset by futureFurther, changes in commodity prices and the number of coffee-related derivative gains as the coffee market changes, recovered through operating income asinstruments held could have a result of lower cost of goods assigned to the related coffee or recovered from customers for whom contracts were purchased for their accounts, suchsignificant impact on cash deposit requirements under our broker and counterparty agreements. Such transactions could cause volatility in our results because the recognition of losses and the offsetting gains may occur in different fiscal periods. Rapid, sharp decreases in the cost of green coffee could also force us to lower sales prices before realizing cost reductions in our green coffee inventory. Open contracts associated
Our business and results of operations are highly dependent upon sales of roast and ground coffee products. Any decrease in the demand for coffee could materially adversely affect our business and financial results.
Sales of roast and ground coffee represented approximately 61%, 61% and 60% of our net sales in the fiscal years ended June 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Demand for our products is affected by, among other things, consumer tastes and preferences, global economic conditions, demographic trends and competing products. Any decrease in demand for our roast and ground coffee products would cause our sales and profitability to decline.
Price increases may not be sufficient to offset cost increases or may result in volume declines which could adversely impact our revenues and gross margin.
Customers generally pay for our products based either on an announced price schedule or under commodity-based pricing arrangements whereby the changes in green coffee commodity costs are passed through to the customer. The pricing schedule is generally subject to adjustment, either on contractual terms or in accordance with periodic product price adjustments, which may result in a lag in our ability to correlate the changes in our prices with fluctuations in the cost of raw materials and other inputs. Depending on contractual restrictions, we may be unable to pass some or all of these hedgingcost increases to our customers by increasing the selling prices of our products. If we are not successful in increasing selling prices sufficiently to offset increased raw material and other input costs, including packaging, direct labor and other overhead, or if our sales volume decreases significantly as a result of price increases, our results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected.
We rely on co-packers to provide our supply of tea, spice and culinary products. Any failure by co-packers to fulfill their obligations or any termination or renegotiation of our co-pack agreements could adversely affect our results of operations.
We have a number of supply agreements with co-packers that require them to provide us with specific finished goods, including tea, spice and culinary products. For some of our products we essentially rely upon a single co-packer as our sole-source for the product. The failure for any reason of any such sole-source or other co-packer to fulfill its obligations under the applicable agreements with us or the termination or renegotiation of any such co-pack agreement could result in disruptions to our supply of finished goods and have an adverse effect on our results of operations. Additionally, our co-packers are subject to risk, including labor disputes, union organizing activities, financial liquidity, inclement weather, natural disasters, supply constraints, and general economic and political conditions that could limit their ability to timely provide us with acceptable products, which could disrupt our supply of finished goods, or require that we incur additional expense by providing financial accommodations to the co-packer or taking other steps to seek to minimize or avoid supply disruption, such as establishing a new co-pack arrangement with another provider. A new co-pack arrangement may not be available on terms as favorable to us as our existing co-pack arrangements, if at all.


Competition in the coffee industry and beverage category could impact our profitability.
The coffee industry is highly competitive, including with respect to price, product quality, service, convenience and innovation, and competition could become increasingly more intense due to the relatively low barriers to entry. We face competition from many sources, including the institutional foodservice divisions of multi-national manufacturers of retail products many of which have greater financial and other resources than we do, wholesale foodservice distributors, regional institutional coffee roasters, and specialty coffee suppliers. As many of our customers are describedsmall foodservice operators, we also compete with cash and carry and club stores and on-line retailers. If we do not succeed in Part II, Item 7A, "Quantitativedifferentiating ourselves through, among other things, our product and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk"service offerings, then our competitive position may be weakened and our sales and profitability may be materially adversely affected. If, due to competitive pressures or contractual restrictions, we are required to reduce prices to attract market share or we are unable to increase prices in response to commodity and other cost increases, our results of this Form 10-K.operations could be adversely affected if we are not able to increase sales volumes to offset the margin declines. Increased competition in the single-serve, ready-to-drink coffee beverage and cold-brewed coffee channels, as well as competition from other beverages, such as soft drinks (including highly caffeinated energy drinks), juices, bottled water, teas and other beverages, may also have an adverse impact on sales of our coffee products.
WE FACE EXPOSURE TO OTHER COMMODITY COST FLUCTUATIONS, WHICH COULD IMPACT OUR MARGINS AND PROFITABILITY.We face exposure to other commodity cost fluctuations, which could impact our margins and profitability.
WeIn addition to green coffee, we are exposed to cost fluctuations in other commodities under supply arrangements, including milk,tea, spices, natural gas and gasoline. Our key packaging materials include plastic resins derived from petroleum, including polyethylene terephthalate (PET)such as cartonboard, corrugated and polypropylene resin used for plastic bottlesplastic. We purchase certain finished goods and film packaging used formaterials under cost-plus supply arrangements whereby our roasted coffees, closures, cardboard and paperboard cartons. Some of these raw materials and supplies are available from a limited number of suppliers or are in shortest supply when seasonal demand is at its peak. In addition,cost may increase based on an increase in the cost of fuel could indirectly lead to higher electricity costs, transportation costs and otherunderlying commodity costs. Much like green coffee costs, the costsprice. The cost of these commodities depend on various factors beyond our control, including economic and political conditions, foreign currency fluctuations, and global weather patterns. ToUnlike green coffee, we do not purchase any derivative instruments to hedge cost fluctuations in these other commodities. As a result, to the extent we are unable to pass along such costs to our customers through price increases, our margins and profitability will decrease.

6



INCREASE IN THE COST, DISRUPTION OF SUPPLY OR SHORTAGE OF ENERGY OR FUEL COULD AFFECT OUR PROFITABILITY.Increase in the cost, disruption of supply or shortage of energy or fuel could affect our profitability.
We operate a large fleet of trucks and other motor vehicles to distribute and deliver our products, to customers.and we rely on 3PL service providers for our long-haul distribution. Certain products are also distributed by third parties or direct shipped via common carrier. In addition, we use a significant amount of electricity, natural gas and other energy sources to operate our plantsproduction and distribution facilities. An increase in the price, disruption of supply or shortage of fuel and other energy sources in North America that may be caused by increasing demand or by events such as natural disasters, power outages, or the like, would increasecould lead to higher electricity, transportation and other commodity costs, including the pass-through of such costs under our operating costsagreements with 3PL service providers and other suppliers, that could negatively impact our profitability.
IMPAIRMENT CHARGES RELATED TO OUR INDEFINITE-LIVED INTANGIBLE ASSETS COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR FUTURE OPERATING RESULTS.
Indefinite-lived intangible assets (other than goodwill) are not amortized but instead are reviewed for impairment annually and on an interim basis if eventsLoss of business from one or changes in circumstances between annual tests indicate that an asset might be impaired. An indefinite-lived intangible asset (other than goodwill) is deemed impaired if its estimated fair value is less than its carrying value. Failure to achieve our forecasted operating results, due to weakness in the economic environment or other factors, and declines in our market capitalization, among other things, could result in further impairmentmore of our indefinite-lived intangible assetslarge national account customers and adversely affect our operating results.
OUR LEVEL OF INDEBTEDNESS COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR ABILITY TO RAISE ADDITIONAL CAPITAL TO FUND OUR OPERATIONS AND LIMIT OUR ABILITY TO REACT TO CHANGES IN THE ECONOMY OR OUR INDUSTRY.
We have a $75.0 million senior secured revolving credit facility. As of September 30, 2013, we had estimated outstanding borrowings of $20.3 million, including loan extension fees of $0.1 million, utilized $11.2 million of the letters of credit sublimit, and had excess availability under the credit facility of $36.8 million. Maintaining a large loan balance under our credit facilityefforts by these customers to improve their profitability could adversely affect our business and limit our ability to plan for or respond to changes in our business. Additionally, a portion of our borrowings under the credit facility are at variable rates of interest, exposing us to the risk of interest rate volatility, which could lead to an increase in our net loss. Our debt obligations could also:
increase our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions;
require us to dedicate a portion of our cash flow from operations to payments on our indebtedness, thereby reducing the availability of our cash flow for other purposes, including funding daily operations, investing in future business opportunities and capital expenditures;
limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industry in which we operate thereby placing us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors that may have less debt or debt with less restrictive debt covenants;
limit, by the financial and other restrictive covenants in our loan agreement, our ability to borrow additional funds; and
have a material adverse effect on us if we fail to comply with the covenants in our loan agreement because such failure could result in an event of default which, if not cured or waived, could result in our indebtedness becoming immediately due and payable.
RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS IN OUR CREDIT FACILITY MAY RESTRICT OUR ABILITY TO PURSUE OUR BUSINESS STRATEGIES.
Our credit facility contains various covenants that limit our ability and/or our subsidiaries’ ability to, among other things:
incur additional indebtedness;
pay dividends on or make distributions in respect of capital stock or make certain other restricted payments or investments;
sell assets;
create liens on certain assets to secure debt; and
consolidate, merge, sell or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of our assets.

7



Our credit facility also contains restrictive covenants that require the Company and its subsidiaries to satisfy financial condition and liquidity tests. Our ability to meet those tests may be affected by events beyond our control, and there can be no assurance that we will meet those tests. The breach of any of these covenants or our failure to meet the financial condition or liquidity tests could result in a default under the credit facility, and the lenders could elect to declare all amounts borrowed thereunder, together with accrued interest, to be due and payable and could proceed against the collateral securing that indebtedness.
OUR BUSINESS IS SUBJECT TO RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH THE CURRENT ECONOMIC CLIMATE.
Our success depends to a significant extent on a number of factors that affect discretionary consumer spending, including economic conditions, disposable consumer income and consumer confidence, which have deteriorated due to recent economic conditions. In a slow economy, businesses and individuals scale back their discretionary spending on travel and entertainment, including “dining out” as well as the purchase of high-end consumables like specialty coffee. Economic conditions may also cause businesses to reduce travel and entertainment expenses, and may even cause office coffee benefits to be eliminated. The recent economic downturn and decrease in consumer spending may continue to adversely impact our revenues, and may affect our ability to market our products or otherwise implement our business strategy. Additionally, many of the effects and consequences of the global financial crisis and broader global economic downturn are currently unknown; any one or all of them could potentially have a material adverse effect on our liquidityoperations.
We have several large national account customers, the loss of or reduction in sales to one or more of which is likely to have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. We generally do not have long-term contracts with our customers. Accordingly, our customers can stop purchasing our products at any time without penalty and capital resources, includingare free to purchase products from our competitors. There can be no assurance that our customers will continue to purchase our products in the same quantities as they have in the past. In addition, because of the competitive environment facing many of our customers, they have increasingly sought to improve their profitability through pricing concessions and more favorable trade terms. To the extent we provide pricing concessions or favorable trade terms, our margins would be reduced. If we are unable to continue to offer terms that are acceptable to our customers, they may reduce purchases of our products which would adversely affect our financial performance. Requirements that may be imposed on us by our customers, such as sustainability, inventory management or product specification requirements, may have an adverse effect on our results of operations. Additionally, our customers may face financial difficulties, bankruptcy or other business disruptions that may impact their operations and their purchases from us and may affect their ability to sell third party securities inpay us for products which we have invested some of our short-term assets or raise additional capital, if needed, or the ability of our lenders to honor draws on our credit facility, or otherwise negativelycould adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating resultssales and cash flows.profitability.
WE RELY ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND ARE DEPENDENT ON ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING SOFTWARE IN OUR OPERATIONS. ANY MATERIAL FAILURE, INADEQUACY, INTERRUPTION OR SECURITY FAILURE OF THAT TECHNOLOGY COULD AFFECT OUR ABILITY TO EFFECTIVELY OPERATE OUR BUSINESS.

We rely on information technology systems acrossand are dependent on enterprise resource planning software in our operations, including managementoperations. Any material failure, inadequacy, interruption or security failure of that technology could affect our supply chain, point-of-sale processing, and various other processes and transactions. ability to effectively operate our business.
Our ability to effectively manage our business, maintain financial accuracy and efficiency, comply with regulatory, financial reporting, legal and tax requirements, and coordinate the production, distribution and sale of our products depends significantly on the reliability, capacity and capacityintegrity of these systems.information technology systems on which we rely. We are also dependent on enterprise resource planning software for some of our information technology systems and support. The failure of these systems to operate effectively and continuously, problems with transitioning to upgraded or replacement systems, including, without limitation, in connection with the relocation to the New Facility, flaws in third-party software, or a breach in security of these systems could result in delays in processing replenishment orders from our branch warehouses, an inability to record input costs or product sales accurately or at all, an impaired understanding of our operations and results, and reduced operational efficiency. Failure to effectively allocate and manage our resources to support our information technology infrastructure could result in transaction errors, processing inefficiencies, the loss of customers, business disruptions, or the loss of sensitive or confidential data through security breach or otherwise. Significant capital investments could be required to remediate any potential problems.
Inproblems or to otherwise protect against security breaches or to address problems caused by breaches. In addition, if we are unable to prevent security breaches, we may experience a loss of critical data or suffer financial andor reputational damage or penalties because of the unauthorized disclosure of confidential information belonging to us or to our customers or suppliers. Our insurance policies do not cover losses caused by security breaches.
Interruption of our supply chain, including a disruption in operations at any of our production and distribution facilities, could affect our ability to manufacture or distribute products and could adversely affect our business and sales.
We rely on a limited number of production and distribution facilities. A disruption in operations at any of these facilities or any other disruption in our supply chain relating to green coffee supply, service by our 3PL service providers or common carriers, supply of raw materials and finished goods under vendor-managed inventory arrangements, or otherwise, whether as a result of casualty, natural disaster, power loss, telecommunications failure, terrorism, labor shortages, contractual disputes or other causes, could significantly impair our ability to operate our business and adversely affect our relationship with our customers. In addition,such event, we may also be forced to contract with alternative, and possibly more expensive, suppliers or service providers, which would adversely affect our profitability. Additionally, the disclosuremajority of non-public sensitive informationour green coffee comes through external media channelsthe Ports of Houston and Seattle. Any interruption to port operations, highway arteries, gas mains or electrical service in the areas where we operate or obtain products or inventory could leadrestrict our ability to manufacture and distribute our products for sale and would adversely impact our business.
Our failure to accurately forecast demand for our products or quickly respond to forecast changes could have an adverse effect on our sales.
Based upon our forecasts of customer demand, we set target levels for the manufacture of our products and for the purchase of green coffee in advance of customer orders. If our forecasts exceed demand, we could experience excess inventory and manufacturing capacity and/or price decreases or we could be required to write-down expired or obsolete inventory, which could adversely impact our financial performance. Alternatively, if demand for our products increases more than we currently forecast and we are unable to satisfy increases in demand through our current manufacturing capacity or appropriate third-party providers, or we are unable to obtain sufficient raw materials inventories under vendor-managed inventory arrangements, we may not be able to satisfy customer demand for our products which could have an adverse impact on our sales and reputation.
We depend on the expertise of key personnel. The unexpected loss of intellectual propertyone or damagemore of these key employees or difficulty recruiting and retaining qualified personnel could have a material adverse effect on our reputationoperations and brand image.competitive position.
VOLATILITY IN THE EQUITY MARKETS COULD REDUCE THE VALUE OF OUR INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO.Our success largely depends on the efforts and abilities of our executive officers and other key personnel. There is limited management depth in certain key positions throughout the Company. We must continue to recruit, retain and motivate management and other employees sufficiently to maintain our current business and support our projected growth and strategic initiatives. The loss of key employees could adversely affect our operations and competitive position. We do not maintain key person life insurance policies on any of our executive officers.


Investment in acquisitions could disrupt our ongoing business, not result in the anticipated benefits and present risks not originally contemplated.
We maintain a portfoliohave invested and in the future may invest in acquisitions which may involve risks and uncertainties, including the risks involved with entering new product categories or geographic regions, the difficulty in integrating newly-acquired businesses or brands, contingent risks associated with the past operations of fixed-income based investments disclosed as cash equivalentsor other unanticipated problems arising in any acquired business, the challenges of achieving strategic objectives and short-term investmentsother benefits expected from acquisitions, the diversion of our attention and resources from our operations and other initiatives, the potential impairment of acquired assets and liabilities, the performance of underlying products, capabilities or technologies, and the potential loss of key personnel and customers of the acquired businesses. Additionally, any such acquisitions may result in potentially dilutive issuances of our equity securities, the incurrence of additional debt, restructuring charges and the recognition of significant charges for depreciation and amortization related to intangible assets. There can be no assurance that any such acquisitions will be identified or that we will be able to consummate any such acquisitions on terms favorable to us or at all. If any such acquisitions are not successful, our consolidated balance sheets. business and results of operations could be adversely affected.
Volatility in the equity markets could reduce the value of our investment portfolio.
The value of our investmentsinvestment portfolio may be adversely affected by interest rate fluctuations, downgrades in credit ratings, illiquidity in the capital markets and other factors which may result in other than temporary declines in the value of our investments. Any of these events could cause us to record impairment charges with respect to our investment portfolio or to realize losses on the sale of investments. If ourWe have incurred operating losses continue,in the past and if we incur operating losses in the future on a continual basis, a portion or all of this entire investment portfolio may be required to be liquidated to fund those losses.

8



WE ARE LARGELY RELIANT ON MAJOR FACILITIES IN CALIFORNIA, TEXAS AND OREGON FOR PRODUCTION OF OUR PRODUCT LINE.
A significant interruption in operations at any ofIncreased severe weather patterns may increase commodity costs, damage our manufacturing facilities in Torrance, California (our largest facility); Houston, Texas; or Portland, Oregon, whether as a result of a natural disaster, terrorism or other causes, could significantly impairand disrupt our ability to operate our business. The majority of our green coffee comes through the Ports of Los Angeles, Long Beach, Houston, San Franciscoproduction capabilities and Portland. Any interruption to port operations, highway arteries, gas mains or electrical service in these areas could restrict our ability to manufacture and distribute our products for sale and would adversely impact our business.
INCREASED SEVERE WEATHER PATTERNS MAY INCREASE COMMODITY COSTS, DAMAGE OUR FACILITIES AND IMPACT OR DISRUPT OUR PRODUCTION CAPABILITIES AND SUPPLY CHAIN.supply chain.
There is increasing concern that a gradual increase in global average temperatures due to increased concentration of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases in the atmosphere have caused and will continue to cause significant changes in weather patterns around the globe and an increase in the frequency and severity of extreme weather events. Major weather phenomena like El Niño and La Niña are dramatically affecting coffee growing countries. The wet and dry seasons are becoming unpredictable in timing and duration, causing improper development of the coffee cherries. A large portion of the global coffee supply comes from Brazil and so the climate and growing conditions in that country carry heightened importance. Decreased agricultural productivity in certain regions as a result of changing weather patterns may affect the quality, limit the availability or increase the cost of key agricultural commodities, such as green coffee sugar and tea, which are important ingredients for our products. We have experienced storm-related damages and disruptions to our operations in the recent past related to both winter storms as well as heavy rainfall and flooding. Increased frequency or duration of extreme weather conditions could also damage our facilities, impair production capabilities, disrupt our supply chain or impact demand for our products. As a result, the effects of climate change could have a long-term adverse impact on our business and results of operations.
OUR INDUSTRY IS HIGHLY COMPETITIVE AND WE MAY NOT HAVE THE RESOURCES TO COMPETE EFFECTIVELY.Volatility in the equity markets or interest rate fluctuations could substantially increase our pension funding requirements and negatively impact our financial position.
We primarily compete with other coffee companies, including multi-national firms with substantially greater financial, marketing and operating resources than the Company. We face competition from many sources including the institutional foodservice divisions of multi-national manufacturers of retail products such as J.M. Smucker (Folgers Coffee), Dunkin' Donuts and Kraft Foods Inc. (Maxwell House Coffee), wholesale foodservice distributors such as Sysco Corporation and U.S. Foods, regional institutional coffee roasters such as S & D Coffee, Inc. and Boyd Coffee Company, and specialty coffee suppliers such as Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc., Rogers Family Company, Distant Lands Coffee, Mother Parkers Tea & Coffee, Inc., Starbucks Coffee Company and Peet’s Coffee & Tea, Inc. As many of our customers are small foodservice operators, we also compete with club stores such as Costco and Restaurant Depot. If we do not succeed in differentiating ourselves from our competitors or our competitors adopt our strategies, then our competitive position may be weakened. In addition, from time to time, we may need to reduce our prices in response to competitive and customer pressures and to maintain our market share. Competition and customer pressures, however, also may restrict our ability to increase prices in response to commodity and other cost increases. Our results of operations will be adversely affected if our profit margins decrease, as a result of a reduction in prices or an increase in costs, and if we are unable to increase sales volumes to offset those profit margin decreases.
VOLATILITY IN THE EQUITY MARKETS OR INTEREST RATE FLUCTUATIONS COULD SUBSTANTIALLY INCREASE OUR PENSION FUNDING REQUIREMENTS AND NEGATIVELY IMPACT OUR FINANCIAL POSITION.
At June 30, 2013,2016, the projected benefit obligation under our single employer defined benefit pension plans was $132.2 millionexceeded the fair value of plan assets. The difference between the projected benefit obligation and the fair value of plan assets was $92.4 million. The difference between plan obligations and assets, or the funded status of the plans, significantly affects the net periodic benefit cost and ongoing funding requirements of those plans. Among other factors, changes in interest rates, mortality rates, early retirement rates, mix of plan asset investments, investment returns and the market value of plan assets can affect the level of plan funding, cause volatility in the net periodic benefit cost, and increase our future funding requirements.requirements and require payments to the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation.
OUR SALES AND DISTRIBUTION NETWORK IS COSTLY TO MAINTAIN.Our sales and distribution network is costly to maintain.
Our sales and distribution network requires a large investment to maintain and operate. Costs include the fluctuating cost of gasoline, diesel and oil, costs associated with managing, purchasing, leasing, maintaining and insuring a fleet of delivery vehicles, the cost of maintaining distribution centers and branch warehouses throughout the country, the cost of our


long-haul distribution, and the cost of hiring, training and managing our RSR's.sales force. Many of these costs are beyond our control, and many are fixed rather than variable. Some

9



competitors use alternate methods of distribution that fix, control, reduce or eliminate many of the costs associated with our method of distribution.
EMPLOYEE STRIKES AND OTHER LABOR-RELATED DISRUPTIONS MAY ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR OPERATIONS.We are self-insured and our reserves may not be sufficient to cover future claims.
We are self-insured for many risks up to significant deductible amounts. The premiums associated with our insurance continue to increase. General liability, fire, workers’ compensation, directors and officers liability, life, employee medical, dental and vision, and automobile risks present a large potential liability. While we accrue for this liability based on historical claims experience, future claims may exceed claims we have incurred in the past. Should a different number of claims occur compared to what was estimated or the cost of the claims increase beyond what was anticipated, reserves recorded may not be sufficient and the accruals may need to be adjusted accordingly in future periods.
Competitors may be able to duplicate our roasting and blending methods, which could harm our competitive position.
We consider our roasting and blending methods essential to the flavor and richness of our coffees and, therefore, essential to our brand. Because our roasting methods cannot be patented, we would be unable to prevent competitors from copying these methods if such methods became known. If our competitors copy our roasts or blends, the value of our brand may be diminished, and we may lose customers to our competitors. In addition, competitors may be able to develop roasting or blending methods that are more advanced than our production methods, which may also harm our competitive position.
Employee strikes and other labor-related disruptions may adversely affect our operations.
We have union contracts relating to a significant portion of our workforce. Although we believe union relations have been amicable in the past, there is no assurance that this will continue in the future.future or that we will not be subject to future union organizing activity. There are potential adverse effects of labor disputes with our own employees or by others who provide warehousing, transportation (shipping lines,(lines, truck drivers)drivers, 3PL service providers) or cargo handling (longshoremen), both domestic and foreign, of our raw materials or other products. These actionsStrikes or work stoppages or other business interruptions could occur if we are unable to renew collective bargaining agreements on satisfactory terms or enter into new agreements on satisfactory terms, which could impair manufacturing and distribution of our products or result in a loss of sales, which could adversely impact our business, financial condition or results of operations. The terms and conditions of existing, renegotiated or new collective bargaining agreements could also increase our costs or otherwise affect our ability to fully implement future operational changes to enhance our efficiency or to adapt to changing business needs or strategy.
We could face significant withdrawal liability if we withdraw from participation in the multiemployer pension plans in which we participate.
We participate in two multiemployer defined benefit pension plans and one multiemployer defined contribution pension plan for certain union employees. We make periodic contributions to these plans to allow them to meet their pension benefit obligations to their participants. In the event we withdraw from participation in one or more of these plans, we could be required to make an additional lump-sum contribution to the plan. Our withdrawal liability for any multiemployer pension plan would depend on the extent of the plan’s funding of vested benefits. Future collective bargaining negotiations may result in our withdrawal from the remaining multiemployer pension plans in which we participate and, if successful, may result in a withdrawal liability, the amount of which could be material to our results of operations and cash flows.
Restrictive covenants in our credit facility may limit our ability to make investments or otherwise restrict our ability to obtain, process and/pursue our business strategies.
Our credit facility contains various covenants that limit our ability to, among other things, make investments; incur additional indebtedness; create, incur, assume or distributepermit any liens on our products.property; pay dividends under certain circumstances; and consolidate, merge, sell or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of our assets. Our credit facility also contains financial covenants relating to the maintenance of a fixed charge coverage ratio in certain circumstances. Our ability to meet those covenants may be affected by events beyond our control, and there can be no assurance that we will meet those covenants. The breach of any of these covenants could result in a default under the credit facility.
GOVERNMENT MANDATORY HEALTHCARE REQUIREMENTS COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR PROFITS.

Future impairment charges could adversely affect our operating results.
We offer healthcare benefitsperform an asset impairment analysis on an annual basis or whenever events occur that may indicate possible existence of impairment. Failure to all employees who work at least 40 hours a week and meet service eligibility requirements. In the past, some states, including California, have proposed legislation mandating that employers pay healthcare premiums into a state-run fund for all employees immediately upon hiring or pay a penalty for failingachieve our forecasted operating results, due to do so. If legislation similar to this were to be enacted in California, orweakness in the economic environment or other statesfactors, and declines in our market capitalization, among other things, could result in impairment of our intangible assets and goodwill and adversely affect our operating results.
We rely on independent certification for a number of our coffee products. Loss of certification could harm our business.
A number of our Artisan coffee products are independently certified as “Rainforest Alliance,” “Organic” and “Fair Trade.” We must comply with the requirements of independent organizations and certification authorities in order to label our products as certified. The loss of any independent certifications could adversely affect our reputation and competitive position, which we do business, it could have an adverse effect onharm our business.
Possible legislation or regulation intended to address concerns about climate change could adversely affect our results of operations. In addition, comprehensive health care legislation (the Patient Protectionoperations, cash flows and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010) was passed and signed into law in March 2010. Due to the breadth and complexity of this legislation, it is difficult to predict the financial and operational impacts this legislation will have on us. Our expenses may significantly increase over the long-term as a result of this legislation.
POSSIBLE LEGISLATION OR REGULATION INTENDED TO ADDRESS CONCERNS ABOUT CLIMATE CHANGE COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR RESULTS OF OPERATIONS, CASH FLOWS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION.condition.
Governmental agencies are evaluating changes in laws to address concerns about the possible effects of greenhouse gas emissions on climate. Increased public awareness and concern over climate change may increase the likelihood of more proposals to reduce or mitigate the emission of greenhouse gases. Laws enacted that directly or indirectly affect our suppliers (through an increase in the cost of production or their ability to produce satisfactory products) or our business (through an impact on our inventory availability, cost of goods sold, operations or demand for the products we sell) could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Compliance with any new or more stringent laws or regulations, or stricter interpretations of existing laws, including increased government regulations to limit carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas emissions as a result of concern over climate change, could require us to reduce emissions and to incur compliance costs which could affect our profitability or impede the production or distribution of our products, which could affect our results of operations, cash flows and financial condition. In addition, public expectations for reductions in greenhouse gas emissions could result in increased energy, transportation and raw material costs and may require us to make additional investments in facilities and equipment.
CHANGES IN CONSUMER PREFERENCES COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR BUSINESS.
Our continued success depends, in part, upon the demand for coffee. We believe that competitionoperating results may have significant fluctuations from other beverages continuesperiod to dilute the demand for coffee. Consumers who choose soft drinks (including highly caffeinated energy drinks), juices, bottled water, teas and other beverages reduce spendingperiod which could have a negative effect on coffee. Consumer trends away from coffee could negatively impact our business.
WE ARE SELF-INSURED AND OUR RESERVES MAY NOT BE SUFFICIENT TO COVER FUTURE CLAIMS.
We are self-insured for many risks up to significant deductible amounts. The premiums associated with our insurance continue to increase. General liability, fire, workers’ compensation, directors and officers liability, life, employee medical, dental and vision and automobile risks present a large potential liability. While we accrue for this liability based on historical experience, future claims may exceed claims we have incurred in the past. Should a different number of claims occur compared to what was estimated or the cost of the claims increase beyond what was anticipated, reserves recorded may not be sufficient and the accruals may need to be adjusted accordingly in future periods. In May 2011, we did not meet the minimum credit rating criteria for participation in the alternative security program for California self-insurers. As a result we were required to post a $5.9 million letter of credit as a security deposit to the State of California Department of Industrial Relations Self-Insurance Plans. As of June 30, 2013, this letter of credit continues to serve as a security deposit and has been reduced to $5.4 million.

10



COMPETITORS MAY BE ABLE TO DUPLICATE OUR ROASTING AND BLENDING METHODS, WHICH COULD HARM OUR COMPETITIVE POSITION.
We consider our roasting and blending methods essential to the flavor and richness of our coffees and, therefore, essential to our brand. Because our roasting methods cannot be patented, we would be unable to prevent competitors from copying these methods if such methods became known. If our competitors copy our roasts or blends, the value of our brand may be diminished, and we may lose customers to our competitors. In addition, competitors may be able to develop roasting or blending methods that are more advanced than our production methods, which may also harm our competitive position.
OUR OPERATING RESULTS MAY HAVE SIGNIFICANT FLUCTUATIONS FROM PERIOD TO PERIOD WHICH COULD HAVE A NEGATIVE EFFECT ON OUR STOCK PRICE.stock price.
Our operating results may fluctuate from period to period or within certain periods as a result of a number of factors, including fluctuations in the price and supply of green coffee, fluctuations in the selling prices of our products, the success of our hedging strategy, competition, from existing or new competitors in our industry, changes in consumer preferences, seasonality, our ability to retain and attract customers, our ability to manage inventory and fulfillment operations and maintain gross margins. At the end of each quarter, we record the expected effect of the liquidation of last in, first out ("LIFO")margin, and period and year-end LIFO inventory quantities, if any, and record the actual impact at fiscal year-end.adjustments. Fluctuations in our operating results as a result ofdue to these factors or for any other reason could cause our stock price to decline. In addition, price and volume fluctuations in the stock market as a whole may affect the market price of our stock in ways that may be unrelated to our financial performance. Accordingly, we believe that period-to-period comparisons of our operating results are not necessarily meaningful, and such comparisons should not be relied upon as indicators of future performance.
OPERATING LOSSES MAY CONTINUE AND, AS A RESULT, COULD LEAD TO INCREASED LEVERAGE WHICH MAY HARM OUR FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.If we experience a deterioration in operating performance, operating losses may recur and, as a result, could lead to increased leverage which may harm our financial condition and results of operations.
We have incurred an operating lossesloss in fiscal 2012 and a net lossesloss in each of the prior three fiscal years.2013 and 2012. If our current strategies are unsuccessful, we may not achieve the levels of sales and earnings we expect. As a result, we could suffer additional losses in future years and our stock price could decline leading to deterioration in our credit rating, which could limit the availability of additional financing and increase the cost of obtaining financing. In addition, an increase in leverage could raise the likelihood of a financial covenant breach which in turn could limit our access to existing funding under our credit facility.


Our ability to fund the costs associated with the New Facility, satisfy our operating lease obligations and make payments of principal and interest on our indebtedness depends on our future performance. Should we experience a deterioration in operating performance, we will have less cash flowinflows from operations available to meet these obligations. In addition, if such deterioration were to lead to the closure of branch warehouses or distribution centers,leased facilities, we would need to fund the costs of terminating those leases. If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flowflows from operations in the future to satisfy these financial obligations, we may be required to, among other things:
seek additional financing in the debt or equity markets;
refinance or restructure all or a portion of our indebtedness;
sell selected assets; or
reduce or delay planned capital or operating expenditures.
Such measures might not be sufficient to enable us to satisfy our financial obligations. In addition, any such financing, refinancing or sale of assets might not be available on economically favorable terms.
WE COULD FACE SIGNIFICANT WITHDRAWAL LIABILITY IF WE WITHDRAW FROM PARTICIPATION IN THE MULTIEMPLOYER PENSION PLANS IN WHICH WE PARTICIPATE.
We participate in a multiemployer defined benefit pension plan and a multiemployer defined contribution pension plan for certain union employees. We make periodic contributions to these plans to allow them to meet their pension benefit obligations to their participants. In the event we withdraw from participation in one or both of these plans, we could be required to make an additional lump-sum contribution to the plan, which would be reflected as an expense in our consolidated statement of operations and a liability on our consolidated balance sheet. Our withdrawal liability for any multiemployer plan would depend on the extent of the plan’s funding of vested benefits. Future collective bargaining negotiationsCustomer quality control problems may result in the Company withdrawing from the remaining multiemployer pension plans in which we participate and, if successful, may result in a withdrawal liability, the amount of which could be material to our results of operations and cash flows.

11



WE DEPEND ON THE EXPERTISE OF KEY PERSONNEL. THE UNEXPECTED LOSS OF ONE OR MORE OF THESE KEY EMPLOYEES COULD HAVE A MATERIAL ADVERSE EFFECT ON OUR OPERATIONS AND COMPETITIVE POSITION.
Our continued success largely depends on the efforts and abilities of our executive officers and other key personnel. There is limited management depth in certain key positions throughout the Company. We must continue to recruit, retain and motivate management and other employees to maintain our current business and support our projected growth. The loss of key employees could adversely affect our operations and competitive position. We do not maintain key person life insurance policies on any ofbrands thereby negatively impacting our executive officers.
QUALITY CONTROL PROBLEMS MAY ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR BRANDS THEREBY NEGATIVELY IMPACTING OUR SALES.sales.
Our success depends on our ability to provide customers with high qualityhigh-quality products and service. Although we take measures to ensure that we sell only fresh coffee, tea and culinary products, we have no control over our products once they are purchased by our customers. Accordingly, customers may prepare our products inconsistent with our standards, or store our products for longer periods of time, potentially affecting product quality. Clean water is critical to the preparation of coffee beverages. We have no ability to ensure that our customers use a clean water supply to prepare coffee beverages. If consumers do not perceive our products and service to be of high quality, then the value of our brands may be diminished and, consequently, our operating results and sales may be adversely affected.
ADVERSE PUBLIC OR MEDICAL OPINIONS ABOUT CAFFEINE AND REPORTS OF INCIDENTS INVOLVING FOOD BORNE ILLNESS AND TAMPERING MAY HARM OUR BUSINESS.Adverse public or medical opinions about caffeine may harm our business and reduce our sales.
Coffee contains significant amounts of caffeine and other active compounds, the health effects of some of which are not fully understood. A number of research studies conclude or suggest that excessive consumption of caffeine may lead to increased adverse health effects. An unfavorable report or other negative publicity or litigation on the health effects of caffeine or other compounds present in coffee could significantly reduce the demand for coffee which could harm our business and reduce our sales. In addition, we could be subject to litigation relating to the existence of such compounds in our coffee which could be costly and adversely affect our business.
Similarly, instancesInstances or reports linking us to food safety issues could harm our business and lead to potential product recalls or product liability claims.
Selling products for human consumption involves inherent legal risks. Instances or reports of food safety issues involving our products, whether true or not ofaccurate, such as unclean water supply, food-borne illnesses, and food tampering, have in the past severely injured the reputations of companies in the food processing sector and could in the future affect us as well. Any report linking us to the use of unclean water, food-borne illnessescontamination or food tamperingmislabeling, could damage the value of our brands, negatively impact sales of our products, and potentially lead to product recalls, product liability claims. Clean water is critical to the preparation of coffee beverages. We have no ability to ensure that our customers use a clean water supply to prepare coffee beverages.
PRODUCT RECALLS AND INJURIES CAUSED BY PRODUCTS COULD REDUCE OUR SALES AND HARM OUR BUSINESS.
Selling products for human consumption involves inherent legal risks. We could be required to recall products due to product contamination, spoilageclaims, litigation or other adulteration, product misbranding or product tampering. We may also suffer losses if our products or operations violate applicable laws or regulations, or if our products cause injury, illness or death.damages. A significant product liability claim against us, whether or not successful, or a widespread product recall may reduce our sales and harm our business.
GOVERNMENT REGULATIONS AFFECTING THE CONDUCT OF OUR BUSINESS COULD INCREASE OUR OPERATING COSTS, REDUCE DEMAND FOR OUR PRODUCTS OR RESULT IN LITIGATION.Government regulations affecting the conduct of our business could increase our operating costs, reduce demand for our products or result in litigation.
The conduct of our business including the production, distribution, sale, advertising, marketing, labeling, safety, transportation and use of many of our products, areis subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations. These laws and regulations and interpretations thereof are subject to change as a result of political, economic or social events. Such changes may include changes in: food and drug laws;laws, including the Food Safety Modernization Act of 2011 which requires, among other things, that food facilities conduct contamination hazard analyses, implement risk-based preventive controls and develop track-and-trace capabilities; laws relating to product labeling, advertising and marketing practices; laws regarding ingredients used in our products; and increased regulatory scrutiny of, and increased litigation involving, product claims and concerns regarding the effects on health of ingredients in, or attributes of, our products. ForAny new laws and regulations or changes in existing laws and regulations or the interpretations thereof could require us to change certain of our operational processes and procedures, or implement new ones, and may increase our operating and compliance costs. If we fail to comply with applicable laws and


regulations, we may be subject to civil remedies, including fines, injunctions, recalls or seizures, as well as potential criminal sanctions, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
Significant additional labeling or warning requirements may increase our costs and adversely affect sales of the affected products.
Various jurisdictions may seek to adopt significant additional product labeling (such as requiring labeling of products that contain genetically modified organisms) or warning requirements or limitations on the availability of our products relating to the content or perceived adverse health consequences of certain of our products. If these types of requirements become applicable to one or more of our major products, they may inhibit sales of such products. In addition, for example, we are subject to the California Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986 (commonly known as “Proposition 65”), a law which requires that a specific warning appear on any product sold in California that contains a substance listed by that State as having been found to cause cancer or birth defects. Proposition 65 exposes all food and beverage producers to the possibility of having to provide warnings on their products in California because it does not provide for any generally applicable quantitative threshold below which the presence of a listed substance is exempt from the warning requirement. Consequently, the detection of even a trace amount of a listed substance can subject an affected product to the requirement of a warning label. The Council for Education and Research on Toxics (“CERT”) has filed suit against a number of companies as defendants, including CBI,our subsidiary, Coffee Bean International, Inc., which sell

12



coffee in California for allegedly failing to issue clear and reasonable warnings in accordance with Proposition 65 that the coffee they produce, distribute and/orand sell contains acrylamide in accordance with Proposition 65.
acrylamide. Any action under Proposition 65 would likely seek statutory penalties and costs of enforcement, as well as a requirement to provide warnings and other notices to customers or remove acrylamide from finished products (which may be impossible). If we were required to add warning labels to any of our products or place warnings in certain locations where our products are sold, sales of those products could suffer not only in those locations but elsewhere. Any change in labeling requirements for our products also may lead to an increase in packaging costs or interruptions or delays in packaging deliveries. If we fail
Litigation pending against us could expose us to comply with applicable lawssignificant liabilities and regulations, wedamage our reputation.
We are currently party to various legal and other proceedings, and additional claims may arise in the future. See Note 22, Commitments and Contingencies, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this report. Regardless of the merit of particular claims, litigation may be expensive, time-consuming, operationally disruptive and distracting to management, and could negatively affect our brand name and image and subject us to civil remedies, including fines, injunctions, recallsstatutory penalties and costs of enforcement. We can provide no assurances as to the outcome of any litigation or seizures, as well as potential criminal sanctions, whichthe resolution of any other claims against us. An adverse outcome of any litigation or other claim could have a material adverse effect onnegatively affect our financial condition, results of operations.operations or liquidity.
COMPLIANCE WITH REGULATIONS AFFECTING PUBLICLY TRADED COMPANIES HAS RESULTED IN INCREASED COSTS AND MAY CONTINUE TO RESULT IN INCREASED COSTS IN THE FUTURE.Compliance with regulations affecting publicly traded companies has resulted in increased costs and may continue to result in increased costs in the future.

WeAs a publicly traded company, we are subject to laws, accounting and reporting requirements, tax rules and other regulations of federal and state regulatory authorities,requirements, including NASDAQ and financial market entities, charged with the protection of investors and the oversight of publicly traded companies. During the past few years, these entities, including the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board,those imposed by the SEC and NASDAQ, have issued new regulations and continue to develop additional regulations, most notably the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“SOX”) and, more recently, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.NASDAQ. Our efforts to comply with these requirements and regulations have resulted in, and are likely to continue to result in, increased expenses and a diversion of substantial management time and attention from revenue-generating activities to compliance activities. In particular, our efforts to comply with Section 404 of SOX and the related regulations regarding our required assessment of our internal control over financial reporting and our independent registered public accounting firm's audit of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, have required, and continue to require, the commitment of significant financial and management resources. To the extent that we identify areas of our disclosure controls and procedures and/or internal controls requiring improvement (such as the material weakness in internal controls as of June 30, 2013 discussed in Part II, Item 9A of this Form 10-K), we may have to incur additional costs and divert management's time and attention. Because these laws and regulations are subject to varying interpretations, their application in practice may evolve over time as new guidance becomes available. This evolution may result in continuing uncertainty regarding compliance matters and additional costs necessitated by ongoing revisions to our disclosure and governance practices. Failure to comply with such regulations could have a material adverse effect on our business and stock price.

Concentration of ownership among our principal stockholders may dissuade potential investors from purchasing our stock, may prevent new investors from influencing significant corporate decisions and may result in a lower trading price for our stock than if ownership of our stock was less concentrated.
CONCENTRATION OF OWNERSHIP AMONG OUR PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS MAY DISSUADE POTENTIAL INVESTORS FROM PURCHASING OUR STOCK, MAY PREVENT NEW INVESTORS FROM INFLUENCING SIGNIFICANT CORPORATE DECISIONS AND MAY RESULT IN A LOWER TRADING PRICE FOR OUR STOCK THAN IF OWNERSHIP OF OUR STOCK WAS LESS CONCENTRATED.
As of October 8, 2013,September 12, 2016, members of the Farmer family or entities controlled by the Farmer family (including trusts) beneficially owned approximately 32.4% of our outstanding common stock, including members of the Farmer family or entities controlled by the Farmer family (including trusts) comprising a group for purposes of Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act"Act”), beneficially owned approximately 36.9% of our outstanding common stock. identified in a Schedule 13D/A filed with the SEC on September 8, 2016. As a result, these stockholders, acting together, may be able to influence the outcome of stockholder votes, including votes concerning the election and removal of directors, the amendment of our charter documents, and approval of significant corporate transactions. This level of concentrated ownership may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in the management or voting control of the Company. In addition, this significant concentration of share ownership


may adversely affect the trading price of our common stock if investors perceive disadvantages in owning stock in a company with such concentrated ownership.
FUTURE SALES OF SHARES BY EXISTING STOCKHOLDERS COULD CAUSE OUR STOCK PRICE TO DECLINE.Future sales of shares by existing stockholders could cause our stock price to decline.
All of our outstanding shares are eligible for sale in the public market, subject in certain cases to limitations under Rule 144 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). Also, shares subject to outstanding options and restricted stock under the Farmer Bros. Co. 2007 Omnibus Plan (the "Omnibus Plan")our long-term incentive plan are eligible for sale in the public market to the extent permitted by the provisions of various vesting agreements, our stock ownership guidelines, and Rule 144 under the Securities Act. If these shares are sold, or if it is perceived that they will be sold in the public market, the trading price of our common stock could decline.

13



ANTI-TAKEOVER PROVISIONS COULD MAKE IT MORE DIFFICULT FOR A THIRD PARTY TO ACQUIRE US.
We have adopted a stockholder rights plan (the “Rights Plan”) pursuant to which each share of our outstanding common stock is accompanied by one preferred share purchase right (a “Right”). Each Right, when exercisable, will entitle the registered holder to purchase from the Company one one-hundredth of a share of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock, $1.00 par value per share, at a purchase price of $112.50, subject to adjustment. The Rights expire on March 28, 2015, unless they are earlier redeemed, exchanged or terminated as provided in the Rights Plan. Because the Rights may substantially dilute the stock ownership of a person or group attempting to take us over without the approval of our Board of Directors, our Rights PlanAnti-takeover provisions could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us (or a significant percentage of our outstanding capital stock) without first negotiating with our Board of Directors regarding such acquisition.us.
In addition, ourOur Board of Directors has the authority to issue up to 500,000 shares of preferred stock (of which 200,000 shares have been designated as Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock) and to determine the price, rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions, including voting rights, of those shares without any further vote or action by stockholders. The rights of the holders of our common stock may be subject to, and may be adversely affected by, the rights of the holders of any preferred stock that may be issued in the future. The issuance of preferred stock may have the effect of delaying, deterring or preventing a change in control of the Company without further action by stockholders and may adversely affect the voting and other rights of the holders of our common stock.
Further, certain provisions of our charter documents, including a classified board of directors, provisions eliminating the ability of stockholders to take action by written consent, and provisions limiting the ability of stockholders to raise matters at a meeting of stockholders without giving advance notice, may have the effect of delaying or preventing changes in control or management of the Company, which could have an adverse effect on the market price of our stock. In addition, our charter documents do not permit cumulative voting, which may make it more difficult for a third party to gain control of our Board of Directors. Further, we are subject to the anti-takeover provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which will prohibit us from engaging in a “business combination” with an “interested stockholder” for a period of three years after the date of the transaction in which the person became an interested stockholder, even if such combination is favored by a majority of stockholders, unless the business combination is approved in a prescribed manner. The application of Section 203 also could have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control or management.

Item 1.B.Unresolved Staff Comments
None. 


Item 2.Properties
Our largestcurrent production and most significant facility isdistribution facilities are as follows:
LocationApproximate Square FeetPurposeStatus
Northlake, TX(1)538,000
Under constructionLeased
Houston, TX330,877
Manufacturing and warehouseOwned
Portland, OR114,000
Manufacturing and distributionLeased
Northlake, IL89,837
Distribution and warehouseLeased
Oklahoma City, OK142,115
Distribution and warehouseOwned
Moonachie, NY41,404
Distribution and warehouseLeased
Torrance, CA(2)665,000
Distribution and warehouseLeased
_____________
(1) Upon completion, the New Facility will house our manufacturing, distribution, product development lab and corporate headquartersheadquarters. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016, we exercised the purchase option under the Lease Agreement to acquire the partially constructed New Facility with a targeted closing date in Torrance, California. Our Torrance facility is a manufacturing facilitythe first quarter of fiscal 2017. Construction of and relocation to the distribution hub for our long-haul trucking fleet and housesNew Facility are expected to be completed in the third quarter of fiscal 2017. In the interim, we have leased 32,000 square feet of temporary office space in Fort Worth, Texas near the New Facility to house our primary administrative offices. Coffee purchasing, roasting, grinding, packaging and product development takes place at our Torrance, California; Portland, Oregon; and Houston, Texas plants. Spice blending, grinding, packaging and product development takes place at our Torrance, California plant. Our distribution centers include our Torrance, Portland and Houston plants as well as distribution centersSee Note 4, New Facility Lease Obligation, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Northlake, Illinois; Oklahoma City, Oklahoma; and Moonachie, New Jersey.Part II, Item 8 of this report.
(2)
We sold the Torrance facility on July 15, 2016, subject to a lease back as described in Note 24, Subsequent Events, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this report. As of June 30, 2016, the Torrance facility continued to house certain administrative functions and serve as a distribution facility and a branch warehouse pending transition of the remaining Torrance operations to our other facilities.
As of June 30, 2016, we stage our products in 117109 branch warehouses throughout the contiguous United States. These branch warehouses and oursix distribution centers, taken together, represent a vital part of our business, but no individual branch warehouse is material to the business as a whole. Our branch warehouses vary in size from approximately 2,5001,000 to 50,000 square feet.
Approximately 54%52% of our facilities are leased with a variety of expiration dates through 2020, although our two largest facilities, in Torrance and Houston, are owned.2021. The lease on the Portland facility expires in 2018 and has aoptions to renew up to an additional 10 year renewal option.years.
We calculate our utilization for all of our production facilities on an aggregate basis based on the number of product pounds manufactured during the actual number of production shifts worked during an average week, compared to the number of product pounds that could be manufactured based on the maximum number of production shifts that could be operated during the week (assuming three shifts per day, seven days per week), in each case, based on our current product mix. Utilization rates for our production facilities were approximately 90%, 66% and 65% during the fiscal years ended June 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The higher utilization rate in fiscal 2016 was primarily due to wind-down of production at our Torrance facility and the addition of those production volumes to our Portland and Houston production facilities.
We believe that our plants,Portland and Houston production facilities, together with our existing distribution centers and branch warehouses, will continue to provide adequate capacity for our current operations pending completion of the foreseeable future. A complete listNew Facility. In the event of properties operated by Farmer Bros. is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1significant increases in demand that precede the completion of and incorporated herein by reference.relocation to the New Facility, we may be required to increase staffing, including through temporary labor and overtime, use third-party manufacturers, lease additional production facilities or some combination of those alternatives or others to satisfy demand.

14



Item 3.Legal Proceedings
On August 31, 2012, the Council for EducationFor information regarding legal proceedings in which we are involved, see Note 22, Commitments and Research on Toxics (“CERT”) filed an amendment to a private enforcement action adding a number of companies as defendants, including CBI, which sell coffee in California. The suit alleges that the defendants have failed to issue clear and reasonable warnings in accordance with Proposition 65 that the coffee they produce, distribute and sell contains acrylamide. This lawsuit was filed in Los Angeles Superior Court (the “Court”). CERT has requested that the alleged violators remove acrylamide from their coffee or provide Proposition 65 warnings on their products and pay $2,500 per day for each and every violation while they are in violation of Proposition 65. The Company has joined a Joint Defense Group and, along with the other co-defendants, has answered the complaint, and the pleadings stage of case has been completed. Discovery in preparation for trial recently commenced, following a stay while summary adjudication was resolved in a related case. At this time, the Company is not able to predict the probabilityContingencies, of the outcome or estimateNotes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of loss, if any, related to this matter.report.
We are party to various other pending legal and administrative proceedings. It is our opinion that the outcome of such proceedings will not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable. 


PART II
Item 5.Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Market Information
We have one class ofOur common stock which is tradedtrades on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “FARM.” The following table sets forth for the periods indicated, the cash dividends declared and thequarterly high and low sales prices of the shares ofour common stock ofas reported by NASDAQ for each quarter during the Company as quoted on the NASDAQ Global Market.last two fiscal years.
 Fiscal year ended June 30, 2013 Fiscal year ended June 30, 2012 Year Ended June 30, 2016 Year Ended June 30, 2015
 High Low Dividend High Low Dividend High Low High Low
1st Quarter $10.15
 $7.00
 $
 $12.45
 $4.43
 $
 $28.16
 $20.90
 $29.10
 $20.29
2nd Quarter $15.37
 $8.96
 $
 $8.00
 $4.96
 $
 $32.94
 $26.99
 $31.86
 $26.01
3rd Quarter $15.00
 $12.23
 $
 $12.25
 $7.67
 $
 $31.63
 $24.04
 $32.50
 $22.72
4th Quarter $16.90
 $13.39
 $
 $10.92
 $6.73
 $
 $32.50
 $26.69
 $25.96
 $23.39
On September 12, 2016, the last sale price reported on NASDAQ for our common stock was $33.46 per share.
Holders
As of October 8, 2013,September 12, 2016, there were approximately 2,3002,250 holders of record and the closing price of our common stock on NASDAQ was $15.81.record. Determination of holders of record is based upon the number of record holders and individual participants in security position listings. This does not include persons whose stock is in nominee or “street name” accounts through brokers.
Dividends
Although historically the Company has paid a dividend to stockholders, in light of the Company’s current financial position, theThe Company’s Board of Directors has omitted the payment of a quarterly dividend since the third quarter of fiscal 2011. The amount, if any, of dividends to be paid in the future will depend upon the Company’s then available cash, anticipated cash needs, overall financial condition, loancredit agreement restrictions, future prospects for earnings and cash flows, as well as other relevant factors. For a description of the loancredit agreement restrictions on the payment of dividends, see “Management’s DiscussionLiquidity, Capital Resources and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources” included in Part II, Item 7 of this report, and Note 12, “Bank15, Bank Loan, of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this report.

15




Equity Compensation Plan Information
This information appears in Equity Compensation Plan Informationincluded in Part III, Item 12 of this report.

16



Performance Graph
The chart set forth below showsfollowing graph depicts a comparison of the valuetotal cumulative stockholder return on our common stock for each of the last five fiscal years relative to the performance of the Russell 2000 Index, the Value Line Food Processing Index and a peer group index. The graph assumes an initial investment of $100.00 at the close of trading on June 30, 2007 in each of Farmer Bros. Co. common stock, the Russell 2000 Index and the Value Line Food Processing Index. All values assume reinvestmentbeginning of the pre-tax value offive year period and that all dividends paid by companies included in these indices have been reinvested.
Because no published peer group is similar to the Company's portfolio of business, the Company created a peer group index that includes the following companies: B&G Foods, Inc., Boulder Brands, Inc., Coffee Holding Co. Inc., Dunkin' Brands Group, Inc., National Beverage Corp., SpartanNash Company, Inventure Foods, Inc. and Treehouse Foods, Inc. The companies in the peer group index are calculatedin the same industry as of June 30 of each year. Farmer Bros. Co. with product offerings that overlap with the Company's product offerings. Boulder Brands, Inc. is no longer a public company and has been excluded from the peer group index in fiscal 2016.
The historical stock price performance of the Company’s common stock shown in the performance graph below is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. The Russell 2000 Index, the Value Line Food Processing Index and the peer group index are included for comparative purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect management's opinion that such indices are an appropriate measure for the relative performance of the stock involved, and they are not intended to forecast or be indicative of possible future performance of our common stock.



Comparison of Five-Year Cumulative Total Return
Farmer Bros. Co., Russell 2000 Index, and Value Line Food Processing Index and Peer Group Index
(Performance Results Through June 30, 2013)2016)
 2008
 2009
 2010
 2011
 2012
 2013
 2011
 2012
 2013
 2014
��2015
 2016
Farmer Bros. Co.  $100.00
 $110.48
 $74.53
 $51.06
 $40.08
 $70.79
 $100.00
 $78.50
 $138.66
 $213.12
 $231.76
 $316.17
Russell 2000 Index $100.00
 $74.99
 $91.11
 $125.19
 $122.59
 $152.26
 $100.00
 $97.92
 $121.63
 $150.38
 $160.61
 $150.70
Value Line Food Processing Index $100.00
 $95.02
 $116.36
 $150.71
 $163.75
 $196.43
 $100.00
 $108.65
 $130.34
 $159.51
 $170.55
 $202.07
Peer Group Index $100.00
 $119.31
 $144.21
 $160.87
 $175.66
 $215.12
Source: Value Line Publishing, LLC



17




Item 6.Selected Financial Data
As discussed in Note 2, “Restatement,” and Note 19, “Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited),” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K, we have restated in this Form 10-K our consolidated financial statements for certain prior periods to correct certain errors in those financial statements. The errors related to our accounting for certain postretirement benefit obligations for our retiree medical plan, failure to timely adopt accounting guidance relating to a postretirement death benefit, when originally issued, and failure to record the appropriate amounts reflecting the cash surrender value of life insurance policies purchased to fund the postretirement death benefit. The financial statements and data for the restated periods also reflect certain other immaterial adjustments and reclassifications to conform to the current year presentation.

The following selected consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Risk Factors, and our consolidated financial statements and the notes to those consolidated financial statementsthereto included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.

report. The consolidated statements of operations data set forth belowhistorical results do not necessarily indicate results expected for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2013, 2012 and 2011, and the consolidated balance sheet data as of June 30, 2013 and 2012, are derived from, and are qualified in their entirety by reference to, our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Form 10-K. The consolidated statements of operations data set forth below for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, and the consolidated balance sheet data as of June 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009, has been restated to conform to the consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-K.
any future period.
 Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009(1)
   As Restated As Restated As Restated As Restated
Consolidated Statement of Operations Data (in thousands, except per share data):         
Net sales$509,964
 $495,442
 $463,945
 $450,318
 $341,724
Cost of goods sold$318,825
 $322,540
 $306,458
 $254,686
 $180,321
Loss from operations$(4,095) $(22,114) $(70,367) $(40,599) $(14,306)
Loss from operations per common share$(0.26) $(1.43) $(4.67) $(2.73) $(0.99)
Net loss(2)(3)$(8,462) $(26,576) $(52,033) $(25,359) $(34,142)
Net loss per common share-basic and diluted$(0.54) $(1.72) $(3.45) $(1.71) $(2.35)
Cash dividends declared per common share$
 $
 $0.18
 $0.46
 $0.46
          
          
          
 June 30,
 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009(1)
   As Restated As Restated As Restated As Restated
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data (in thousands, except per share data):         
Total assets(4)$244,136
 $257,916
 $292,050
 $342,084
 $334,244
Capital lease obligations(5)$12,168
 $15,867
 $8,636
 $3,861
 $1,252
Long-term borrowings under revolving credit facility$10,000
 $
 $
 $
 $
Long-term derivative liability$1,129
 $
 $
 $
 $
Total liabilities(6)$162,298
 $174,364
 $158,635
 $180,341
 $139,048
 Year Ended June 30,
(In thousands, except per share data)2016 2015 2014 2013 2012
Consolidated Statement of Operations Data:         
Net sales$544,382
 $545,882
 $528,380
 $513,869
 $498,701
Cost of goods sold$335,907
 $348,846
 $332,466
 $328,693
 $332,309
Restructuring and other transition expenses(1)$16,533
 $10,432
 $
 $
 $
Net gains from sale of Spice Assets(2)$(5,603) $
 $
 $
 $
Net (gains) losses from sales of assets$(2,802) $394
 $(3,814) $(4,467) $(268)
Income (loss) from operations$8,179
 $3,284
 $8,916
 $372
 $(21,846)
Income (loss) from operations per common share—diluted$0.49
 $0.20
 $0.56
 $0.02
 $(1.41)
Income tax (benefit) expense(3)$(79,997) $402
 $705
 $(825) $(347)
Net income (loss)(4)$89,918
 $652
 $12,132
 $(8,462) $(26,576)
Net income (loss) per common share—basic$5.45
 $0.04
 $0.76
 $(0.54) $(1.72)
Net income (loss) per common share—diluted$5.41
 $0.04
 $0.76
 $(0.54) $(1.72)
Cash dividends declared per common share$
 $
 $
 $
 $
          
 June 30,
(In thousands)2016 2015 2014 2013 2012
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:         
Total assets(5)$368,991
 $240,943
 $266,177
 $244,136
 $257,916
Deferred income taxes$80,786
 $751
 $414
 $467
 $861
Capital lease obligations(6)$2,359
 $5,848
 $9,703
 $12,168
 $15,867
Long-term borrowings under revolving credit facility$
 $
 $
 $10,000
 $
Earn-out payable-RLC acquisition(7)$100
 $200
 $
 $
 $
Long-term derivative liabilities$
 $25
 $
 $1,129
 $
Total liabilities(8)$186,397
 $150,932
 $151,313
 $162,298
 $174,364
_____________ 
(1) Includes the results of operationsSee Note 3, Corporate Relocation Plan, of the DSD Coffee Business since its acquisition by the Company effective Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this report.February 28, 2009.

18




(2) See Note 5, Sale of Spice Assets, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this report.
(3) Includes non-cash income tax benefit of $80.3 million in fiscal 2016 from the release of valuation allowance on deferred tax assets. See Note 20, Income Taxes, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this report.
(4) Includes: (a)$0.1 million in impairment losses on intangible assets, $34,000 in pension curtailment expense, $1.1 million in beneficial effect of liquidation of LIFO inventory quantities of $4.2 million, $4.9 million, $0, $1.1 million and $4.5$14.2 million in net gains from sales of assets, primarily real estate, in fiscal 2013;2016, 2015, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively; and (b) $5.6$5.6 million in impairment losses on goodwill and intangible assets $4.6and $4.6 million in pension withdrawal expense $14.2 millionin beneficial effect of liquidation of LIFO inventory quantities and $1.4fiscal 2012.
(5) Includes $28.1 million in net gains from sales of assets primarily real estate,at June 30, 2016 recorded in fiscal 2012; (c) $7.8 million"Property, plant and equipment" to offset New Facility lease obligation recorded in impairment losses on intangible assets, $1.5 million in pension curtailment expense, $1.1 million in beneficial effect of liquidation of LIFO inventory quantities, $1.4 million in net gains from sales of assets, primarily real estate, and $13.4 million in income tax benefit in fiscal 2011; (d) $0.8 million in beneficial effect of liquidation of LIFO inventory quantities and $2.5 million in income tax benefit in fiscal 2010; and (e) a deferred tax asset valuation allowance of $20.4 million recorded as income tax expense in fiscal 2009. Excludes in fiscal 2013, $7.9 million in losses from coffee-related derivatives designated as cash flow hedges.
(3)
Net loss, as restated, compared to net loss, as originally reported, reflects a decrease (increase) of $2.8 million, $2.3 million, $(1.4) million and $(0.9) million in fiscal 2012, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Net loss per common share—basic and diluted, as restated, compared to net loss per common share—basic and diluted, as originally reported, reflects a decrease (increase) of $0.17, $0.16, $(0.10) and $(0.06) in fiscal 2012, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
(4) Total assets, as restated, compared to total assets, as originally reported, reflects a $2.2 million, $2.1 million, $2.9 million and $2.7 million increase in cash surrender value of life insurance policies purchased to fund"Other long-term liabilities"related the postretirement death benefit in fiscal 2012, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively,New Facility included in "Other assets" on our consolidated balance sheets."Property, plant and equipment" as the deemed owner of the New Facility.
(5)(6) Excludes imputed interest.


(6) Total liabilities, as restated, compared to total liabilities, as originally reported, reflects (a) an(7) See $8.1 millionNote 2, $6.4Acquisition, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this report.
(8) Includes $28.1 million New Facility lease obligation at June 30, 2016 recorded in “Other long-term liabilities.”
See Note 19, $6.4 millionOther Long-Term Liabilities, and $5.1 million increaseof the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in accrued postretirement benefits in fiscal 2012, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively, related to the postretirement death benefit; and (b) a $(20.7) million and $(11.2) million reduction in accrued postretirement benefits in fiscal 2012 and 2011, respectively, related to the retiree medical plan. See Note 2, “Restatement.”Part II, Item 8 of this report.



19



Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of many factors. The results of operations for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 20112014 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any future period. The following discussion should be read in combination with the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in Part II, Item 8 of this report and with the “Risk Factors”Risk Factors described in Part I, Item 1A of this report.
Restatement of Previously Issued Financial Statements
As discussed in Note 2, “Restatement,” and Note 19, “Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited),” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K, we have restated in this Form 10-K our consolidated financial statements for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 and our unaudited quarterly financial data for each of the quarters in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012 and for the first three quarters in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013. Specifically, we have restated our consolidated financial statements as a result of certain errors related to our accounting for certain postretirement benefit obligations for our retiree medical plan, failure to timely adopt accounting guidance relating to a postretirement death benefit, when originally issued, and failure to record the appropriate amounts reflecting the cash surrender value of life insurance policies purchased to fund the postretirement death benefit. The financial statements and data for the restated periods also reflect certain other immaterial adjustments and reclassifications to conform to the current year presentation. The combined impact of these adjustments to the applicable line items in our consolidated financial statements is set forth in Notes 2 and 19 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Management has also concluded that, as of June 30, 2013, our internal controls over financial reporting were not effective due to a material weakness in our controls over our accounting for and reporting of other postretirement benefit obligations. See “Controls and Procedures” included in Part II, Item 9A of this Form 10-K.

Overview
We are a manufacturer,national coffee roaster, wholesaler and distributor of coffee, tea and culinary products. We are a direct distributor of coffee to restaurants, hotels, casinos, offices, QSR's, convenience stores, healthcare facilities and other foodservice providers,products manufactured under supply agreements, under our owned brands, as well as under private brand retailers in the QSR, grocery, drugstore, restaurant, convenience store and independent coffeehouse channels.labels on behalf of certain customers. We were founded in 1912, were incorporated in California in 1923, and reincorporated in Delaware in 2004. We operate in one business segment.
Since 2007, Farmer Bros. has achieved growth, primarily throughWe serve a wide variety of customers, from small independent restaurants and foodservice operators to large institutional buyers like restaurants and convenience store chains, hotels, casinos, hospitals, and gourmet coffee houses, as well as grocery chains with private brand and consumer-branded coffee products. Through our sustainability, stewardship, environmental efforts, and leadership we are not only committed to serving the acquisition in 2007finest products available, considering the cost needs of CBH, the parent companycustomer, but also insist on their sustainable cultivation, manufacture and distribution whenever possible. Our product categories consist of CBI, a specialtyrobust line of roast and ground coffee, manufacturerincluding organic, Direct Trade, DTVS and wholesaler headquarteredsustainably-produced offerings; frozen liquid coffee; flavored and unflavored iced and hot teas; culinary products including gelatins and puddings, soup bases, dressings, gravy and sauce mixes, pancake and biscuit mixes, jellies and preserves, and coffee-related products such as coffee filters, sugar and creamers; spices; and other beverages including cappuccino, cocoa, granitas, and ready-to-drink iced coffee. We offer a comprehensive approach to our customers by providing not only a breadth of high-quality products, but also value-added services such as market insight, beverage planning, and equipment placement and service.
We operate production facilities in Portland, Oregon and Houston, Texas. Distribution takes place out of our Portland facility as well as three separate distribution centers in Northlake, Illinois; Oklahoma City, Oklahoma; and Moonachie, New Jersey. As of June 30, 2016, the Torrance facility continued to house certain administrative functions, serve as a distribution facility and branch warehouse pending transition of the remaining Torrance operations to our other facilities. Upon completion, the New Facility will serve as a production facility and distribution center for our products.
Our products reach our customers primarily in two ways: through our nationwide DSD network of 450 delivery routes and 109 branch warehouses at June 30, 2016, or direct-shipped via common carriers or third-party distributors. We operate a large fleet of trucks and other vehicles to distribute and deliver our products, and we rely on 3PL service providers for our long-haul distribution. DSD sales are made “off-truck” to our customers at their places of business.
Corporate Relocation
In an effort to make the Company more competitive and better positioned to capitalize on growth opportunities, in fiscal 2015 we began the process of relocating our corporate headquarters, product development lab, and manufacturing and distribution operations from Torrance, California to a new facility housing these operations currently under construction in Northlake, Texas (the “Corporate Relocation Plan”). Approximately 350 positions were impacted as a result of the Torrance facility closure.


The significant milestones associated with our Corporate Relocation Plan are as follows:
EventDate
Announced Corporate Relocation PlanQ3 fiscal 2015
Transitioned coffee processing and packaging from Torrance production facility
and consolidated them with Houston and Portland production facilities
Q4 fiscal 2015
Moved Houston distribution operations to Oklahoma City distribution centerQ4 fiscal 2015
Entered into the lease agreement and development management agreement for New FacilityQ1 fiscal 2016
Commenced construction of New FacilityQ1 fiscal 2016
Transitioned primary administrative offices from Torrance to temporary leased offices in Fort Worth, TexasQ1-Q2 fiscal 2016
Sold Spice Assets to HarrisQ2 fiscal 2016
Principal design work completed on New FacilityQ3 fiscal 2016
Completed transition services to Harris and ceased spice processing and packaging at Torrance facilityQ4 fiscal 2016
Entered into purchase and sale agreement to sell Torrance facilityQ4 fiscal 2016
Exercised purchase option on New FacilityQ4 fiscal 2016
Closed sale of Torrance facilityQ1 fiscal 2017
Close on purchase option for New FacilityEstimated Q1 fiscal 2017
Exit from Torrance facilityEstimated Q2 fiscal 2017
Completion of construction and relocation to New FacilityEstimated Q3 fiscal 2017
See Liquidity, Capital Resources and Financial Condition below for further details of the impact of these activities on our financial condition and liquidity.
Recent Developments
On September 9, 2016, we entered into an asset purchase agreement to acquire substantially all of the assets of China Mist Brands, Inc., for an aggregate purchase price of $11.3 million, with $10.8 million to be paid in cash at closing and $0.5 million to be paid as earnout if certain sales levels are achieved in the calendar years of 2017 and 2018. The transaction is expected to close during the second quarter of fiscal 2017. We anticipate that the acquisition of China Mist will give us a greater presence in 2009the high-growth premium tea industry. See Note 24, Subsequent Events, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this report.
Important Factors Affecting Our Results of Operations
We have identified factors that affect our industry and business which we expect to also play an important role in our future growth and profitability. Some of these factors include:
Demographic and Channel Trends.Our success is dependent upon our ability to develop new products in response to demographic and other trends to better compete in areas such as premium coffee and tea, including expansion of our product portfolio by investing resources in what we believe to be key growth categories, including the launch of our Metropolitan™ single cup coffee, expanded seasonal coffee and specialty beverages, new shelf-stable coffee products, new hot teas, the introduction of Collaborative Coffee™ branded products into the retail grocery channel, and the packaging redesign and product portfolio optimization of our Un Momento® retail branded product line.
Fluctuations in Green Coffee Prices. Our primary raw material is green coffee, an agricultural commodity traded on the Commodities and Futures Exchange that is subject to price fluctuations. Over the past five years, coffee “C” market price per pound ranged from approximately $1.02 to $2.90. The coffee “C” market price as of June 30, 2016 and 2015 was $1.46 and $1.32 per pound, respectively. The price and availability of green coffee directly impacts our results of operations. For additional details, see Risk Factors in Part I, Item 1A of this report.


Hedging Strategy. We are exposed to market risk of losses due to changes in coffee commodity prices. Our business model strives to reduce the impact of green coffee price fluctuations on our financial results and to protect and stabilize our margins, principally through customer arrangements and derivative instruments, as further explained in Note 7, Derivative Instruments, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this report. In each of fiscal 2016 and fiscal 2015, a lower percentage of our roast and ground coffee volume was based on a price schedule and a higher percentage was sold to customers under commodity-based pricing arrangements as compared to fiscal 2014.
Sustainability. With an increasing focus on sustainability across the coffee and foodservice industry, and particularly from Sara Leethe customers we serve, it is important for us to embrace sustainability across our operations, in the quality of certainour products, as well as, how we treat our coffee growers. We believe that our collective efforts in measuring our social and environmental impact, creating programs for waste, water and energy reduction, promoting partnerships in our supply chain that aim at supply chain stability and food security, and focusing on employee engagement place us in a unique position to help retailers and foodservice operators create differentiated coffee programs that can include sustainable supply chains, direct trade purchasing, training and technical assistance, recycling and composting networks, and packaging material reductions.
Supply Chain Efficiencies and Competition. In order to compete effectively and capitalize on growth opportunities, we must continue to evaluate and undertake initiatives to reduce costs and streamline our supply chain. We undertook the Corporate Relocation Plan, in part, to pursue improved production efficiency to allow us to provide a more cost-competitive offering of high-quality products. We continue to look for ways to deploy our personnel, systems, assets usedand infrastructure to create or enhance stockholder value. Areas of focus have included corporate staffing and structure, methods of procurement, logistics, inventory management, supporting technology, and real estate assets.
Market Opportunities. We have invested and in the future may invest in acquisitions that we believe will enhance long-term stockholder value and complement or enhance our product, equipment, service and/or distribution offerings to existing and new customer bases. For example, subsequent to the fiscal year end, on September 9, 2016, we entered into an asset purchase agreement to acquire substantially all of the assets of China Mist as described in Note 24, Subsequent Events, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this report. We anticipate that the acquisition of China Mist will give us a greater presence in the high-growth premium tea industry. Additionally, in the first quarter of fiscal 2015 we acquired substantially all of the assets of Rae' Launo Corporation (“RLC”) as described in Note 2, Acquisition, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this report.
Capacity Utilization. We calculate our utilization for all of our production facilities on an aggregate basis based on the number of product pounds manufactured during the actual number of production shifts worked during an average week, compared to the number of product pounds that could be manufactured based on the maximum number of production shifts that could be operated during the week (assuming three shifts per day, seven days per week), in each case, based on our current product mix. Utilization rates for our production facilities were approximately 90%, 66% and 65% during the fiscal years ended June 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The higher utilization rate in fiscal 2016 was due to the wind-down of production at our Torrance facility and the addition of those production volumes to our Portland and Houston production facilities. Since most of our customers do not commit to long-term firm production schedules, we are unable to forecast the level of customer orders with certainty to maximize utilization of manufacturing capacity. As a result, our production facility capacity utilization generally remains less than 100%.



Results of Operations
Fiscal Years Ended June 30, 2016 and 2015
Financial Highlights
Gross profit increased 5.8% to $208.5 million in fiscal 2016 from $197.0 million in fiscal 2015.
Gross margin increased to 38.3% in fiscal 2016 from 36.1% in fiscal 2015.
Income from operations increased 149.1% to $8.2 million in fiscal 2016 from $3.3 million in fiscal 2015.
Net income was $89.9 million, or $5.41 per diluted common share, in fiscal 2016, primarily due to non-cash income tax benefit of $80.3 million from the release of valuation allowance on deferred tax assets, compared to $0.7 million, or $0.04 per diluted common share, in fiscal 2015.
Fiscal 2016 Strategic Initiatives
In fiscal 2016, we undertook initiatives to reduce costs, streamline our supply chain, improve the breadth of products and services we provide to our customers, and better position the Company to attract new customers. These initiatives included the following:
Corporate Relocation Plan. We continued to execute on the Corporate Relocation Plan that we initiated in the third quarter of fiscal 2015 by executing on the milestones described above under Corporate Relocation.
Third-Party Logistics. During the second half of fiscal 2016, we replaced our long-haul fleet operations with 3PL. We expect that this transportation arrangement will reduce our fuel consumption and empty trailer miles, while improving our intermodal and trailer cube utilization.
Vendor Managed Inventory. During the second half of fiscal 2016, we entered into a vendor managed inventory arrangement with a third party. We anticipate that the use of vendor managed inventory arrangements will result in a reduction in raw material, finished goods and logistics costs, while improving packaging innovation and fulfillment.
DSD Reorganization. In fiscal 2016, we continued our efforts to improve efficiencies in our sales and product offerings. During the second half of fiscal 2016, we began to realign our DSD organization by undertaking initiatives intended to streamline communication and decision making, enhance branch organizational structure, and improve customer focus, including toward a comprehensive training program for all DSD team members to strengthen customer engagement. In fiscal 2016, we executed a regional test of our first advertising and lead generation campaign designed to improve our new customer acquisition rate within our DSD network.
Branch Consolidation and Property Sales. In an effort to streamline our branch operations, in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016 we sold two Northern California branch properties, with a third Northern California property under contract for sale, and we acquired a new branch facility in Hayward, California.
Introduction of Collaborative Coffee™ and Redesign of Un Momento® Branded Retail Products. In an effort to address what we believe to be unmet consumer needs and improve margin within the retail grocery environment, in fiscal 2016, we launched Collaborative Coffee™, a new brand of ethically sourced, whole bean direct trade coffees into the retail grocery channel. In addition, we completed a packaging redesign and product portfolio optimization of our Un Momento® retail branded product line.
Net Sales
Net sales in fiscal 2016 decreased $1.5 million, or 0.3%, to $544.4 million from $545.9 million in fiscal 2015 primarily due to a decrease in net sales of coffee and tea products, partially offset by an increase in net sales of spice products and other beverages. Net sales in fiscal 2016 included $9.7 million in price decreases to customers utilizing commodity-based pricing arrangements, where the changes in the green coffee commodity costs are passed on to the customer, as compared to $9.7 million in price increases to customers utilizing such arrangements in fiscal 2015.


The change in net sales in fiscal 2016 compared to fiscal 2015 was due to the following:
(In millions)
Year Ended June 30,
 2016 vs. 2015
Effect of change in unit sales$14.4
Effect of pricing and product mix changes(15.9)
Total decrease in net sales$(1.5)
Unit sales increased 3.6% in fiscal 2016 as compared to fiscal 2015, but average unit price decreased by 3.8% resulting in a decrease in net sales of 0.3%. The increase in unit sales was primarily due to a 3.4% increase in unit sales of roast and ground coffee products, which accounted for approximately 61% of our total net sales, while the decrease in average unit price was primarily due to the lower average unit price of roast and ground coffee products primarily driven by the pass-through of lower green coffee commodity purchase costs to our customers. In fiscal 2016, we processed and sold approximately 90.7 million pounds of green coffee as compared to 87.7 million pounds of green coffee processed and sold in fiscal 2015. There were no new product category introductions in fiscal 2016 or 2015 which had a material impact on our net sales.
The following table presents net sales aggregated by product category for the respective periods indicated:
  Year Ended June 30,
  2016 2015
(In thousands) $ % of total $ % of total
Net Sales by Product Category:        
Coffee (Roast & Ground) $332,533
 61% $336,129
 60%
Coffee (Frozen Liquid) 35,933
 7% 37,428
 7%
Tea (Iced & Hot) 25,096
 4% 27,172
 5%
Culinary 54,036
 10% 54,208
 11%
Spice(1) 35,789
 6% 32,336
 6%
Other beverages(2) 57,690
 11% 54,933
 10%
     Net sales by product category 541,077
 99% 542,206
 99%
Fuel surcharge 3,305
 1% 3,676
 1%
     Net sales $544,382
 100% $545,882
 100%
____________
(1) Spice product net sales included $3.2 million in sale of inventory to Harris at cost in fiscal 2016 upon conclusion of the transition services provided by the Company in connection with the DSD Coffee Business.sale of Spice Assets.
(2) Includes all beverages other than coffee and tea.
Cost of Goods Sold
Cost of goods sold in fiscal 2016 decreased $12.9 million, or 3.7%, to $335.9 million, or 61.7% of net sales, from $348.8 million, or 63.9% of net sales, in fiscal 2015. The decrease in cost of goods sold as a percentage of net sales in fiscal 2016 was primarily due to lower coffee commodity costs compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year, supply chain efficiencies realized primarily through the consolidation of our former Torrance coffee production volumes into our Houston manufacturing facility, and other supply chain improvements. The average Arabica "C” market price of green coffee decreased 24.8% in fiscal 2016. Inventories decreased at the end of fiscal 2016 compared to fiscal 2015 primarily due to production consolidation and the sale of processed and unprocessed inventories to Harris at cost upon conclusion of the transition services provided by the Company in connection with the sale of Spice Assets. As a result, a beneficial effect of liquidation of LIFO inventory quantities in the amount of $4.2 million was recorded in cost of goods sold in fiscal 2016 reducing cost of goods sold by the same amount. In fiscal 2015 $4.9 million in beneficial effect of liquidation of LIFO inventory quantities was recorded.


Gross Profit
Gross profit in fiscal 2016 increased $11.4 million, or 5.8%, to $208.5 million from $197.0 million in the prior fiscal year and gross margin increased to 38.3% in fiscal 2016 from 36.1% in the prior fiscal year. The increase in gross profit was primarily due to lower coffee commodity costs compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year, supply chain efficiencies realized primarily through the consolidation of our former Torrance coffee production volumes into our Houston manufacturing facility and other supply chain improvements. Gross profit in fiscal 2016 and 2015 included the beneficial effect of the liquidation of LIFO inventory quantities in the amount of $4.2 million and $4.9 million, respectively.
Operating Expenses
In fiscal 2016, operating expenses increased $6.5 million, or 3.4%, to $200.3 million or 36.8% of net sales, from $193.8 million, or 35.5% of net sales, in fiscal 2015, primarily due to higher general and administrative expenses and restructuring and other transition expenses associated with the Corporate Relocation Plan as compared to the prior fiscal year. General and administrative expenses and restructuring and other transition expenses increased $10.8 million and $6.1 million, respectively, in fiscal 2016, as compared to the prior fiscal year, partially offset by a $1.6 million decrease in selling expenses. The increase in general and administrative expenses in fiscal 2016 as compared to fiscal 2015 was primarily due to higher accruals for incentive compensation to eligible employees as compared to a reduction in accrual for incentive compensation to eligible employees in the prior fiscal year, an increase in employee and retiree medical costs, workers' compensation expense and the write-off of a long-term loan receivable that was deemed uncollectible. The increase in general and administrative expenses was partially offset by $5.6 million in net gains from sale of Spice Assets and $2.8 million in net gains from sales of assets, primarily real estate, as compared to $(0.4) million in net losses from sales of assets, primarily vehicles, in fiscal 2015. The decrease in selling expenses in fiscal 2016 as compared to fiscal 2015 was primarily due to lower depreciation and amortization expense and lower vehicle, fuel and freight expenses, partially offset by higher accruals for incentive compensation for eligible employees as compared to a reduction in accrual for incentive compensation to eligible employees in the prior fiscal year.
Income from Operations
Income from operations in fiscal 2016 was $8.2 million as compared to $3.3 million in fiscal 2015 primarily due to higher gross profit, net gains from the sale of Spice Assets and certain real estate assets and lower selling expenses, partially offset by higher restructuring and other transition expenses associated with the Corporate Relocation Plan and general and administrative expenses.
Total Other Income (Expense)
Total other income in fiscal 2016 was $1.7 million compared to total other expense of $(2.2) million in fiscal 2015, primarily due to net gains on derivative instruments and investments of $0.3 million in fiscal 2016 compared to net losses on derivative instruments and investments of $(3.3) million in fiscal 2015. The net gains and net losses on derivative instruments and investments in fiscal 2016 and fiscal 2015, respectively, were primarily due to mark-to-market net gains and net losses on coffee-related derivative instruments not designated as accounting hedges. Net gains on such coffee-related derivative instruments in fiscal 2016 were $0.3 million compared to net losses of $(3.0) million in fiscal 2015. In fiscal 2016 and 2015, we recognized $(0.6) million and $(0.3) million in net losses on coffee-related derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges due to ineffectiveness.
Income Taxes
In fiscal 2016, we released $80.3 million of the valuation allowance on deferred tax assets, resulting in unreserved deferred tax assets of $90.2 million at June 30, 2016 and a non-cash reduction in income tax expense, or a tax benefit of $80.0 million in fiscal 2016 as compared to income tax expense of $(0.4) million in fiscal 2015. In fiscal 2016, total deferred tax assets were largely unchanged. Deferred tax assets related to our defined benefit pension plans and retiree medical plan increased due to losses recorded in OCI, and net operating loss related to deferred tax assets declined as losses were used to offset current income. In fiscal 2015, deferred tax assets increased primarily due to losses recorded in Other comprehensive income (loss) ("OCI") related to coffee-related derivative instruments, our defined benefit pension plans and retiree medical plan.


Since 2009, a full valuation allowance has been maintained to offset our deferred tax assets. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016, after analyzing the available positive and negative evidence, we concluded that it is more likely than not that we will utilize a portion of our tax loss carryforwards. In this analysis, we considered the following items of positive evidence: twelve quarters of our cumulative gain position and our forecasted future earnings; completion of parts of our restructuring plan which significantly reduced costs; and sale of our Torrance facility which is expected to result in a significant gain in the first quarter of fiscal 2017. We also considered the following items of negative evidence: large pension related OCI losses that we recorded in the prior twelve quarters and potential expiration of certain state unused net operating loss carryforwards and credits.
We cannot conclude that certain state net operating loss carryforwards and tax credit carryovers will be utilized before expiration. Accordingly, we will maintain a valuation allowance of $1.6 million to offset these deferred tax assets. We will continue to monitor all available evidence, both positive and negative, in determining whether it is more likely than not that the Company will realize its remaining deferred tax assets.
The Internal Revenue Service is currently auditing our tax years ended June 30, 2013 and 2014.
Net Income
As a result of the foregoing factors, net income was $89.9 million, or $5.41 per diluted common share, in fiscal 2016 as compared to $0.7 million, or $0.04 per diluted common share, in fiscal 2015.

Fiscal Years Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014
Overview
In fiscal 2015, we continued our efforts to improve efficiencies in our sales and product offerings. These efforts included targeted selling efforts in untapped markets, sales and marketing training for all of our RSRs, and the discontinuation over 300 SKUs, excluding the SKUs added from the RLC Acquisition. We also continued to expand our product portfolio by investing resources in what we believe to be key growth categories, including the launch of our Metropolitan™ single cup coffee, expanded seasonal coffee and specialty beverages, new shelf-stable coffee products, and new hot teas.
Net Sales
Net sales in fiscal 2015 increased $17.5 million, or 3.3%, to $545.9 million from $528.4 million in fiscal 2014. The increase in net sales in fiscal 2015 included $9.7 million in price increases to customers utilizing commodity-based pricing arrangements, where the changes in the green coffee commodity costs are passed on to the customer.
The change in net sales in fiscal 2015 compared to fiscal 2014 was due to the following:
(In millions)
Year Ended June 30,
 2015 vs. 2014
Effect of change in unit sales$(2.0)
Effect of pricing and product mix changes19.5
Total increase in net sales$17.5
Unit sales decreased (0.2)% in fiscal 2015 as compared to fiscal 2014, fully offset by a 3.5% increase in average unit price resulting in an increase in net sales of 3.3%. The decrease in unit sales was primarily due to a (0.7)% decrease in unit sales of roast and ground coffee products, which accounted for approximately 61% of our total net sales, while the increase in average unit price was primarily due to the higher average unit price of roast and ground coffee products primarily driven by the pass-through of higher green coffee commodity purchase costs to our customers. In fiscal 2015, we processed and sold approximately 87.7 million pounds of green coffee as compared to approximately 88.3 million pounds of green coffee processed and sold in fiscal 2014. There were no new product category introductions in fiscal 2015 or 2014 which had a material impact on our net sales.


The following table presents net sales aggregated by product category for the respective periods indicated:
  Year Ended June 30,
  2015 2014
(In thousands) $ % of total $ % of total
Net Sales by Product Category:        
Coffee (Roast & Ground) $336,129
 61% $319,251
 60%
Coffee (Frozen Liquid) 37,428
 7% 37,840
 7%
Tea (Iced & Hot) 27,172
 5% 28,452
 5%
Culinary 54,208
 10% 56,567
 11%
Spice 32,336
 6% 31,876
 6%
Other beverages(1) 54,933
 10% 50,572
 10%
     Net sales by product category 542,206
 99% 524,558
 99%
Fuel surcharge 3,676
 1% 3,822
 1%
     Net sales $545,882
 100% $528,380
 100%
____________
(1) Includes all beverages other than coffee and tea.
Cost of Goods Sold
Cost of goods sold in fiscal 2015 increased $16.4 million, or 4.9%, to $348.8 million, or 63.9% of net sales, from $332.5 million, or 62.9% of net sales in fiscal 2014. The increase in cost of goods sold as a percentage of net sales in fiscal 2015 was primarily due to a 16.2% increase in the average Arabica "C” market price of green coffee. Inventories decreased at the end of fiscal 2015 compared to fiscal 2014 and, therefore, a beneficial effect of liquidation of LIFO inventory quantities in the amount of $4.9 million was recorded in cost of goods sold in fiscal 2015 reducing cost of goods sold by the same amount. No beneficial effect of liquidation of LIFO inventory quantities was recorded in fiscal 2014.
Gross Profit
Gross profit in fiscal 2015 increased $1.1 million, or 0.6%, to $197.0 million from $195.9 million in fiscal 2014, but gross margin decreased to 36.1% in fiscal 2015 from 37.1% in the prior fiscal year. The increase in gross profit was primarily due to the increase in net sales from higher prices of roast and ground coffee, frozen liquid coffee, tea products, spice and other beverages. The decrease in gross margin was primarily due to a 16.9% increase in the average “C” market price of green coffee as compared to the prior fiscal year. Gross profit in fiscal 2015 included the beneficial effect of the liquidation of LIFO inventory quantities in the amount of $4.9 million.
Operating Expenses
In fiscal 2015, operating expenses increased $6.8 million, or 3.6%, to $193.8 million, or 35.5% of net sales, from $187.0 million, or 35.4% of net sales, in fiscal 2014, primarily due to $10.4 million in restructuring and other transition expenses associated with the Corporate Relocation Plan. In fiscal 2015 selling expenses decreased $(3.3) million and general and administrative expenses decreased $(4.6) million as compared to fiscal 2014. The decrease in selling expenses in fiscal 2015 as compared to fiscal 2014 was primarily due to lower depreciation and amortization expense, bonus expense and salaries-related expense offset by an increase in workers' compensation expense. The decrease in general and administrative expenses in fiscal 2015 as compared to fiscal 2014 was primarily due to lower depreciation and amortization expense, bonus expense, consulting expense and the absence of expenses in connection with the restatement of certain prior period financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013. This decrease in general and administrative expenses was partially offset by an increase in salaries-related expense, employee and retiree medical expense, ESOP compensation expense and workers' compensation expense. Operating expenses in fiscal 2015 also reflected $(0.4) million in net losses from sales of assets, primarily vehicles, as compared to $3.8 million in net gains from sales of assets, primarily real estate, in fiscal 2014.


Income from Operations
Income from operations in fiscal 2015 was $3.3 million compared to $8.9 million in fiscal 2014 primarily due to restructuring and other transition expenses associated with the Corporate Relocation Plan and lower gross profit partially offset by the decrease in selling expenses and general administrative expenses.
Total Other Income (Expense)
Total other expense in fiscal 2015 was $(2.2) million compared to total other income of $3.9 million in fiscal 2014, primarily due to net losses on derivative instruments and investments of $(3.3) million compared to net gains on derivative instruments and investments of $3.1 million in fiscal 2014. The net losses and net gains on derivative instruments and investments in fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2014, respectively, were primarily due to mark-to-market net losses and net gains, respectively, on coffee-related derivative instruments not designated as accounting hedges. Net losses on such coffee-related derivative instruments in fiscal 2015 were $(3.0) million compared to net gains on such coffee-related derivative instruments in fiscal 2014 of $2.7 million. In each of the fiscal years ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, we recognized $(0.3) million in losses on coffee-related derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges due to ineffectiveness.
Income Taxes
In fiscal 2015, we recorded income tax expense of $0.4 million compared to $0.7 million in fiscal 2014. Income tax expense in fiscal 2015 was primarily attributable to cash taxes paid.
As of June 30, 2015, the Company has generated approximately $0.6 million of excess tax benefits related to stock compensation, the benefit of which will be recorded to additional paid in capital if and when realized.
Net Income
As a result of the foregoing factors, net income was $0.7 million, or $0.04 per diluted common share, in fiscal 2015 compared to $12.1 million, or $0.76 per diluted common share, in fiscal 2014.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures
In addition to net income determined in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), we use the following non-GAAP financial measures in assessing our operating performance:
“Non-GAAP net income” is defined as net income excluding the impact of:
restructuring and other transition expenses;
net gains and losses from sales of assets; and
income tax benefit, including the release of valuation allowance on deferred tax assets.
“Non-GAAP net income per diluted common share” is defined as Non-GAAP net income divided by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding, inclusive of the dilutive effect of common equivalent shares outstanding during the period.


“Adjusted EBITDA” is defined as net income excluding the impact of:
income taxes;
interest expense;
depreciation and amortization expense;
ESOP and share-based compensation expense;
non-cash impairment losses;
non-cash pension withdrawal expense;
other similar non-cash expenses;
restructuring and other transition expenses; and
net gains and losses from sales of assets.
“Adjusted EBITDA Margin” is defined as Adjusted EBITDA expressed as a percentage of net sales.
Restructuring and other transition expenses are expenses that are directly attributable to the Corporate Relocation Plan, consisting primarily of employee retention and separation benefits, facility-related costs and other related costs such as travel, legal, consulting and other professional services.
We believe these non-GAAP financial measures provide a useful measure of the Company’s operating results, a meaningful comparison with historical results and with the results of other companies, and insight into the Company's ongoing operating performance. Further, management utilizes these measures, in addition to GAAP measures, when evaluating and comparing the Company's operating performance against internal financial forecasts and budgets.
In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016, we modified the calculation of Non-GAAP net income and Non-GAAP net income per diluted common share to exclude the non-cash income tax benefit from the release of valuation allowance on deferred tax assets. We believe this non-cash income tax benefit is not reflective of our ongoing operating results and that excluding the income tax benefit will help investors with comparability of our results. The historical presentation of the non-GAAP measures was not affected by this modification.
Non-GAAP net income, Non-GAAP net income per diluted common share, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Margin, as defined by us, may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies. We do not intend for non-GAAP financial measures to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for other measures prepared in accordance with GAAP.
Set forth below is a reconciliation of reported net income to Non-GAAP net income and reported net income per common share-diluted to Non-GAAP net income per diluted common share:


  Year Ended June 30,
(In thousands) 2016 2015 2014
Net income, as reported $89,918
 $652
 $12,132
Restructuring and other transition expenses 16,533
 10,432
 
Net gains from sale of Spice Assets (5,603) 
 
Net (gains) losses from sales of assets (2,802) 394
 (3,814)
Non-cash income tax benefit, including release of valuation allowance on deferred tax assets (80,439) 
 
Non-GAAP net income $17,607
 $11,478
 $8,318
       
Net income per common share—diluted, as reported $5.41
 $0.04
 $0.76
Impact of restructuring and other transition expenses $1.00
 $0.64
 $
Impact of net gains from sale of Spice Assets $(0.34) $
 $
Impact of net (gains) losses from sales of assets $(0.17) $0.03
 $(0.24)
Impact of release of valuation allowance on deferred tax assets $(4.84) $
 $
Non-GAAP net income per diluted common share $1.06
 $0.71
 $0.52

Set forth below is a reconciliation of reported net income to Adjusted EBITDA: 
  Year Ended June 30,
(In thousands) 2016 2015 2014
Net income, as reported $89,918
 $652
 $12,132
Income tax (benefit) expense (79,997) 402
 705
Interest expense 425
 769
 1,258
Depreciation and amortization expense 20,774
 24,179
 27,334
ESOP and share-based compensation expense 4,342
 5,691
 4,692
Restructuring and other transition expenses 16,533
 10,432
 
Net gains from sale of Spice Assets (5,603) 
 
Net (gains) losses from sales of assets (2,802) 394
 (3,814)
Adjusted EBITDA $43,590
 $42,519
 $42,307
Adjusted EBITDA Margin 8.0% 7.8% 8.0%

Liquidity, Capital Resources and Financial Condition
Credit Facility
We maintain a $75.0 million senior secured revolving credit facility (the “Revolving Facility”) with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and SunTrust Bank (collectively, the “Lenders”), with a sublimit on letters of credit and swingline loans of $30.0 million and $15.0 million respectively. The Revolving Facility includes an accordion feature whereby we may increase the Revolving Commitment by up to an additional $50.0 million, subject to certain conditions. Advances are based on our eligible accounts receivable, eligible inventory, and the value of certain real property and trademarks, less required reserves. The commitment fee ranges from 0.25% to 0.375% per annum based on average revolver usage. Outstanding obligations are collateralized by all of our assets, excluding certain real property not included in the borrowing base, machinery and equipment (other than inventory), and our preferred stock portfolio. Borrowings under the Revolving Facility bear interest based on average historical excess availability levels with a range of PRIME - 0.25% to PRIME + 0.50% or Adjusted LIBO Rate + 1.25% to Adjusted LIBO Rate + 2.00%. We are subject to a variety of affirmative and negative


covenants of types customary in an asset-based lending facility, including financial covenants relating to the maintenance of a fixed charge coverage ratio in certain circumstances, and the right of the Lenders to establish reserve requirements, which may reduce the amount of credit otherwise available to us. We are allowed to pay dividends, provided, among other things, certain excess availability requirements are met, and no event of default exists or has occurred and is continuing as of the date of any such payment and after giving effect thereto. The Revolving Facility expires on March 2, 2020.
At June 30, 2016, we were eligible to borrow up to a total of $58.6 million under the Revolving Facility and had outstanding borrowings of $0.1 million, utilized $11.9 million of the letters of credit sublimit, and had excess availability under the Revolving Facility of $46.6 million. At June 30, 2016, the weighted average interest rate on our outstanding borrowings under the Revolving Facility was 1.64%. At June 30, 2016, we were in compliance with all of the restrictive covenants under the Revolving Facility.
At August 31, 2016, we had estimated outstanding borrowings of $0.2 million, utilized $11.9 million of the letters of credit sublimit, and had excess availability under the Revolving Facility of $46.5 million. At August 31, 2016, the weighted average interest rate on our outstanding borrowings under the Revolving Facility was 1.65%.
Liquidity
We generally finance our operations through cash flows from operations and borrowings under our Revolving Facility described above. At June 30, 2016, we had $21.1 million in cash and cash equivalents and $25.6 million in short-term investments. We believe our Revolving Facility, to the extent available, in addition to our cash flows from operations and other liquid assets, the net proceeds from the sale of the Spice Assets and the proceeds from the sale of our Torrance facility, collectively, will be sufficient to fund our working capital and capital expenditure requirements for the next 12 to 18 months including the expected capital expenditures associated with the Corporate Relocation Plan, the purchase option under the Lease Agreement for the partially constructed New Facility, additional construction costs to complete the New Facility and anticipated capital expenditures for machinery and equipment, furniture and fixtures, and related expenditures.
Changes in Cash Flows
We generate cash from operating activities primarily from cash collections related to the sale of our products. Net cash provided by operating activities was $27.6 million in fiscal 2016 compared to $26.9 million in fiscal 2015 and $52.9 million in fiscal 2014. The higher level of net cash provided by operating activities in fiscal 2016 compared to the prior fiscal year was primarily due to higher net income and a higher level of cash inflows from operating activities. The increase in net income was primarily due to non-cash income tax benefit resulting from the release of valuation allowance on deferred tax assets. The higher level of cash inflows from operating activities was primarily due to higher proceeds from sales of short-term investments, accruals for incentive compensation payments to eligible employees and a decrease in inventory balances, partially offset by higher cash outflows from increases in derivative assets and accounts receivable balances, purchases of short-term investments and payments for restructuring and other transition expenses. Inventories decreased at the end of fiscal 2016 compared to fiscal 2015 primarily due to production consolidation, and the sale of processed and unprocessed inventories to Harris at cost upon conclusion of the transition services provided by the Company in connection with the sale of Spice Assets. At June 30, 2016, we had a net gain position in our margin accounts for coffee-related derivative instruments resulting in the release of restriction of the use of $1.0 million of cash in these accounts, which contributed to higher cash inflows in fiscal 2016. In fiscal 2015, the lower level of net cash provided by operating activities as compared to the prior fiscal year was due to lower net income and a higher level of cash outflows from operating activities. Cash outflows were primarily from payments of accounts payable balances including the payment of expenses associated with the Corporate Relocation Plan, payroll expenses including accrued bonuses and restriction of cash held in margin accounts for coffee-related derivative instruments. Cash outflows were partially offset by cash inflows from a decrease in inventory balances. Inventory balances decreased in fiscal 2015 compared to the prior fiscal year primarily due to the consolidation of coffee production from the Torrance production facility with the Houston and Portland production facilities pursuant to our Corporate Relocation Plan. At June 30, 2015, we had a net loss position in our margin accounts for coffee-related derivative instruments resulting in restriction of the use of $1.0 million of cash in these accounts, which contributed to lower cash inflows in fiscal 2015.
Net cash used in investing activities was $39.5 million in fiscal 2016 as compared to $20.1 million in fiscal 2015 and $20.7 million in fiscal 2014. In fiscal 2016, net cash used in investing activities included $31.1 million for purchases of property, plant and equipment including $4.4 million in machinery and equipment for the New Facility and $19.4 million in


purchases of construction-in-progress assets in connection with the construction of the New Facility as the deemed owner under the lease arrangement, partially offset by $10.9 million in proceeds from sales of assets, primarily spice assets and real estate. In fiscal 2015, net cash used in investing activities included $1.2 million in payments in connection with the RLC Acquisition and $19.2 million for purchases of property, plant and equipment, partially offset by proceeds from sales of assets, primarily vehicles, of $0.3 million. The increase in cash outflows for property, plant and equipment compared to the prior fiscal year was primarily due to the capital expenditures for the New Facility as the deemed owner of the New Facility.
Net cash provided by financing activities in fiscal 2016 was $17.8 million as compared to net cash used in financing activities of $3.6 million and $22.8 million in fiscal 2015 and 2014, respectively. Net cash provided by financing activities in fiscal 2016 included $19.4 million in proceeds from lease financing in connection with the construction of the New Facility as the deemed owner under the lease arrangement and $1.7 million in proceeds from stock option exercises, partially offset by $3.1 million used to pay capital lease obligations, $0.2 million in tax withholding payments related to net share settlement of equity awards and net repayments on our credit facility of $31,000. Net cash used in financing activities in fiscal 2015 included $3.9 million used to pay capital lease obligations, $0.6 million in net repayments on our credit facility, $0.6 million in deferred financing costs for the Revolving Facility and $0.1 million in tax withholding payments related to net share settlement of equity awards, partially offset by $1.5 million in proceeds from stock option exercises. Net repayments on our credit facility in fiscal 2014 were $20.6 million.
Sale of Spice Assets
In order to focus on our core product offerings, in the second quarter of fiscal 2016, we completed the sale of certain assets associated with our manufacture, processing and distribution of raw, processed and blended spices and certain other culinary products to Harris. We received $6.0 million in cash at closing, and we are eligible to receive an earnout amount of up to $5.0 million over a three year period based upon a percentage of certain institutional spice sales by Harris following the closing. The sale of the Spice Assets does not represent a strategic shift for us and is not expected to have a material impact on our results of operations because we will continue to sell a complete portfolio of spice and other culinary products purchased from Harris under a supply agreement to our DSD customers. See Note 5, Sale of Spice Assets, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this report.
Sale of Torrance Facility
In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016, we entered into a purchase and sale agreement to sell the Torrance facility. Subsequent to the fiscal year end, the sale of the Torrance facility closed on July 15, 2016 for an aggregate cash sale price of $43.0 million (which sale price was subject to customary adjustments for closing costs and documentary transfer taxes). We have agreed to lease back the Torrance facility on a triple net basis through October 31, 2016 at zero base rent, subject to two one-month extensions at our option at a base rent of $100,000 per month. As of June 30, 2016, the Torrance facility continued to house certain administrative functions and serve as a distribution facility and branch warehouse pending transition of the remaining Torrance operations to our other facilities. See Note 6, Assets Held for Sale, and Note 24, Subsequent Events, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this report.
Torrance Facility Exit Costs
Based on current assumptions and subject to continued implementation of the Corporate Relocation Plan, we estimate that we will incur approximately $31 million in cash costs in connection with the exit of the Torrance facility consisting of $18 million in employee retention and separation benefits, $5 million in facility-related costs and $8 million in other related costs. Since adoption of the Corporate Relocation Plan in fiscal 2015 through June 30, 2016, we have recognized a total of $25.7 million of the estimated $31 million in aggregate cash costs, including $16.2 million in employee retention and separation benefits, $3.1 million in facility-related costs related to the relocation of our Torrance operations and certain distribution operations and $6.4 million in other related costs recorded in “Restructuring and other transition expenses” in our consolidated statements of operations. The remainder is expected to be recognized in the first half of fiscal 2017. Additionally, we recognized from inception through fiscal 2016 $1.3 million in non-cash depreciation expense associated with the Torrance production facility. We may incur certain other non-cash asset impairment costs and pension-related costs in connection with the Corporate Relocation Plan. See Note 3, Corporate Relocation Plan, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this report.


New Facility Construction Costs
In the first quarter of fiscal 2016, we entered into the Lease Agreement for the New Facility pursuant to which the New Facility is being constructed by the lessor, at its expense, in accordance with agreed upon specifications and plans. Based on the final budget, which reflects substantial completion of the principal design work for the New Facility, we estimate that the construction costs for the New Facility will be approximately $55 million to $60 million.
In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016 we exercised the purchase option under the Lease Agreement to acquire the partially constructed New Facility with a targeted closing date in the first quarter of fiscal 2017. The estimated purchase option exercise price for the New Facility is $58.8 million based on the budget for the completed facility. The actual option exercise price for the partially constructed New Facility will depend upon, among other things, the timing of the closing and the actual costs incurred for construction of the New Facility as of the purchase option closing date. See Note 4, New Facility Lease Obligation, and Note 22, Commitments and Contingencies, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this report.
We recorded an asset related to the New Facility lease obligation included in property, plant and equipment of $28.1 million at June 30, 2016, as the deemed owner of the New Facility, and an offsetting liability of $28.1 million for the lease obligation in "Other long-term liabilities" on our consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2016. There were no such amounts recorded at June 30, 2015.
Capital Expenditures
For the fiscal years ended June 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014, our capital expenditures were as follows:
    June 30,  
(In thousands) 2016 2015 2014
Coffee brewing equipment $8,375
 $10,709
 $13,550
Vehicles, machinery and equipment 10,254
 6,079
 9,270
Building and facilities 3,354
 1,460
 758
Software, office furniture and equipment 3,165
 946
 1,689
Land 1,458
 
 
Capital expenditures, excluding New Facility $26,606
 $19,194
 $25,267
New Facility:      
Machinery and equipment $4,443
 $22
 $
Total capital expenditures $31,049
 $19,216
 $25,267
We expect to incur approximately $35 million to $39 million in anticipated capital expenditures for machinery and equipment, furniture and fixtures, and related expenditures associated with the New Facility. As of June 30, 2016, we had spent $4.4 million towards the purchase of machinery and equipment for the New Facility. No such capital expenditures were incurred in fiscal 2015. The majority of the capital expenditures associated with machinery and equipment, furniture and fixtures and related expenditures for the New Facility are expected to be incurred in the first half of fiscal 2017.
Our expected capital expenditures for fiscal 2017 unrelated to the New Facility include expenditures to replace normal wear and tear of coffee brewing equipment, vehicles, machinery and equipment and mobile sales solution hardware, and are expected to be consistent with the average capital expenditures for the past three fiscal years.


Working Capital
At June 30, 2016 and 2015, our working capital was composed of the following: 
  June 30,
(In thousands) 2016 2015
Current assets(1) $153,365
 $135,685
Current liabilities(2) 56,837
 64,874
Working capital $96,528
 $70,811
__________
(1) Includes $4.0 million in coffee-related short-term derivative assets and $7.2 million in assets held for sale at June 30, 2016 and $1.0 million in restricted cash at June 30, 2015.
(2) Includes $4.0 million in coffee-related short-term derivative liabilities and $1.4 million in deferred tax liabilities at June 30, 2015.

Contractual Obligations
The following table contains information regarding total contractual obligations as of June 30, 2016, including capital leases: 
  Payment due by period
(In thousands) Total 
Less Than
One Year
 
1-3
Years
 
3-5
Years
 
More Than
5 Years
Contractual obligations:          
Operating lease obligations $11,801
 $4,093
 $5,927
 $1,720
 $61
New Facility purchase option exercise price(1) 58,779
 58,779
 
 
 
Capital lease obligations(2) 2,504
 1,443
 1,005
 56
 
Pension plan obligations 89,950
 8,075
 16,858
 17,918
 47,099
Postretirement benefits other than
    pension plans
 11,957
 1,080
 2,245
 2,386
 6,246
Revolving credit facility 109
 109
 
 
 
Purchase commitments(3) 72,217
 72,217
 
 
 
   Total contractual obligations $247,317
 $145,796
 $26,035
 $22,080
 $53,406
 ______________
(1) In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016, we exercised the purchase option under the Lease Agreement to acquire the partially constructed New Facility with a targeted closing date in the first quarter of fiscal 2017. The purchase option exercise price shown in the table above is an estimate based on the budget for the completed facility. The actual option exercise price for the partially constructed New Facility will depend upon, among other things, the timing of the closing and the actual costs incurred for construction of the New Facility as of the purchase option closing date. See Note 4, New Facility Lease Obligation, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this report.
(2) Includes imputed interest of $0.1 million.
(3) Purchase commitments include commitments under coffee purchase contracts for which all delivery terms have been finalized but the related coffee has not been received as of June 30, 2016. Amounts shown in the table above: (a) include all coffee purchase contracts that the Company considers to be from normal purchases; and (b) do not include amounts related to derivative instruments that are recorded at fair value on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets.

As of June 30, 2016, we had committed to purchase green coffee inventory totaling $62.5 million under fixed-price contracts, $3.3 million in equipment for the New Facility and $6.3 million in other inventory under non-cancelable purchase orders.


Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements. 

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP").GAAP. Our significant accounting policies are discussed in Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, of the Notes to our consolidated financial statements,Consolidated Financial Statements, included herein atin Part II, Item 8.8 of this report. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to inventory valuation, including LIFO reserves, the allowance for doubtful accounts,valuation of intangible assets, deferred tax assets, liabilities relating to retirement benefits, liabilities resulting from self-insurance, of our workers’ compensation liabilities, tax liabilities and litigation. We base our estimates, judgments and assumptions on historical experience and other relevant factors that are believed to be reasonable based on information available to us at the time these estimates are made.
While we believe that the historical experience and other factors considered provide a meaningful basis for the accounting policies applied in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements, actual results may differ from these estimates, which could require us to make adjustments to these estimates in future periods.
We believe that the estimates, judgments and assumptions involved in the accounting policies described below require the most subjective judgment and have the greatest potential impact on our financial statements, so we consider these to be our

20



critical accounting policies. Our senior management has reviewed the development and selection of these critical accounting policies and estimates, and their related disclosure in this report, with the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors.
Coffee Brewing EquipmentExposure to Commodity Price Fluctuations and ServiceDerivative Instruments
We classify certain expenses relatedare exposed to commodity price risk arising from changes in the market price of green coffee. In general, increases in the price of green coffee brewing equipment provided to customers ascould cause our cost of goods sold. Thesesold to increase and, if not offset by product price increases, could negatively affect our financial condition and results of operations. As a result, our business model strives to reduce the impact of green coffee price fluctuations on our financial results and to protect and stabilize our margins, principally through customer arrangements and derivative instruments.
Customers generally pay for our products based either on an announced price schedule or under commodity-based pricing arrangements whereby the changes in green coffee commodity costs includeare passed through to the customer. The pricing schedule is generally subject to adjustment, either on contractual terms or in accordance with periodic product price adjustments, typically monthly, resulting in, at the least, a 30-day lag in our ability to correlate the changes in our prices with fluctuations in the cost of the equipment as well as the cost of servicing that equipment (including service employees' salaries, cost of transportationraw materials and the cost of supplies and parts) and are considered directly attributableother inputs.
In addition to the generation of revenues from our customers. We capitalize coffee brewing equipment and depreciate it over a three or five year period, depending on the assessment of its useful life and report the depreciation expense in cost of goods sold.
Investments
Our investments consist of money market instruments, marketable debt and equity securities, variouscustomer arrangements, we utilize derivative instruments primarily exchange traded treasury andto reduce further the impact of changing green coffee futures and options. Investments are held for trading purposes and stated at fair value. The cost of investments sold is determined on the specific identification method. Dividend and interest income is accrued as earned.
Derivative Instruments
commodity prices. We routinely purchase exchange tradedover-the-counter coffee contractsderivative instruments to enable us to lock in the price of green coffee prices within a pre-established range, and hold a mixcommodity purchases. These derivative instruments may be entered into at the direction of futures contracts and optionsthe customer under commodity-based pricing arrangements to help hedge against volatilityeffectively lock in the purchase price of green coffee prices. under such customer arrangements, in certain cases up to 18 months or longer in the future. Notwithstanding this customer direction, pursuant to Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 815, “Derivatives and Hedging,” we are considered the owner of these derivative instruments and, therefore, we are required to account for them as such. In the event the customer fails to purchase the products associated with the underlying derivative instruments for which the price has been locked-in on behalf of the customer, we expect that such derivative instruments will be assigned to, and assumed by, the customer in accordance with contractual terms or, in the absence of such terms, in accordance with standard industry custom and practice. In the event the customer fails to assume such derivative instruments, we will remain obligated on the derivative instruments at settlement. We generally settle derivative instruments to coincide with the receipt of the purchased green coffee or apply the derivative instruments to purchase orders effectively fixing the cost of in-bound green coffee purchases. As of June 30, 2016 and 2015, we had 34.0 million and 34.2 million pounds of green coffee covered under coffee-related derivative instruments,


respectively. We do not purchase any derivative instruments to hedge cost fluctuations of any commodities other than green coffee.
The fair value of derivative instruments is based upon broker quotes. Beginning April 1, 2013, we implemented procedures following the guidelines of Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 815, "Derivatives and Hedging," to enable us toWe account for certain coffee-related derivativesderivative instruments as accounting hedges in order to minimize the volatility created in our quarterly results from utilizing these derivative contracts and to improve comparability between reporting periods. As a result, in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013, aThe effective portion of the gains and losses from re-valuingchange in fair value of the coffee-related derivative contracts to their market prices is being recordedreported in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (“AOCI”) on our consolidated balance sheet and subsequently reclassified tointo cost of goods sold in the period or periods when the hedged transaction affects earnings. At June 30, 2013,2016, approximately 89%96% of our outstanding coffee-related derivativesderivative instruments, representing 32.6 million pounds of forecasted green coffee purchases, were designated as cash flow hedges. At June 30, 2012, no2015, approximately 94% of our outstanding coffee-related derivative instruments, were designated as accounting hedges. Changes in fair valuerepresenting 32.3 million pounds of all derivative instrumentsforecasted green coffee purchases, were designated as cash flow hedges are recorded in other comprehensive income (loss) ("OCI").hedges. The portion of open hedging contracts that are not 100% effective as cash flow hedges and those that are not designated as accounting hedges are marked to period-end market price and unrealized gains or losses based on whether the period-end market price was higher or lower than the price we locked-in are recognized in our resultsfinancial results.
Our risk management practices reduce but do not eliminate our exposure to changing green coffee prices. While we have limited our exposure to unfavorable green coffee price changes, we have also limited our ability to benefit from favorable price changes. Further, our counterparty may require that we post cash collateral if the fair value of operations.
The Companyour derivative liabilities exceed the amount of credit granted by such counterparty, thereby reducing our liquidity. At June 30, 2016, because we had $8.1a net gain position in our coffee-related derivative margin accounts, none of the cash in these accounts was restricted. At June 30, 2015, we had $1.0 million and $1.6 million, respectively, in restricted cash representing cash held on deposit in margin accounts for coffee-related derivative instruments at June 30, 2013 and 2012 which is classified asdue to a current asset.net loss position in such accounts. Changes in commodity prices and the number of coffee-related derivative instruments held could have a significant impact on cash deposit requirements under our broker and counterparty agreements.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
We maintain an allowance for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our customers to meet their obligations. Due to improved collection of our outstanding receivables, in fiscal 2013 and 2012, we decreased the allowance for doubtful accounts by $0.8 million and $1.0 million, respectively.
Inventories
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market. We account for coffee, tea and culinary products on a LIFOthe last in, first out (“LIFO”) basis, and coffee brewing equipment manufacturedparts on athe first in, first out ("FIFO"(“FIFO”) basis. We regularly evaluate ourthese inventories to determine whether market conditionsinventory reserves for obsolete and slow-moving inventory. Inventory reserves are correctly reflected in the recorded carrying value.based on inventory obsolescence trends, historical experience and application of specific identification. At the end of each quarter, we record the expected effect of the liquidation of LIFO inventory quantities, if any, and record the actual impact at fiscal year-end. An actual valuation of inventory under the LIFO method is made only at the end of each fiscal year based on the inventory levels and costs at that time.
If inventory quantities decline at the end of the fiscal year compared to the beginning of the fiscal year, the reduction results in the liquidation of LIFO inventory quantities carried at the cost prevailing in prior years. This LIFO inventory liquidation may result in a decrease or increase in cost of goods sold depending on whether the cost prevailing in prior years was lower or higher, respectively, than the current year cost. InAs these estimates are subject to many forces beyond management's control, interim results are subject to the final fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011, the beneficial effect of this

21



liquidation ofyear-end LIFO inventory quantities reduced cost of goods sold and net loss in the amounts of $1.1 million, $14.2 million and $1.1 million, respectively.
In fiscal 2013, as a result of optimizing and simplifying our product portfolio and discontinuing over 800 SKU's, we established a reserve for slow-moving and obsolete inventory in the amount of $0.7 million.valuation.
Impairment of Goodwill and Indefinite-lived Intangible Assets
We performaccount for our annual impairment test of goodwill and/or otherand indefinite-lived intangible assets as of June 30 of each fiscal year.in accordance with ASC 350, “Intangibles-Goodwill and Other” (“ASC 350”). Goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets are not amortized but instead are reviewed for impairment annually, and onor more frequently if an interim basis if eventsevent occurs or changes in circumstances between annual testschange which indicate that an asset might be impaired. We perform a qualitative assessment of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets on our consolidated balance sheets, to determine if there is a more likely than not indication that our goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are impaired as of June 30. If the indicators of impairment are present, we perform a quantitative test to determine the impairment of these assets as of the measurement date.
Testing for impairment of goodwill is a two-step process. The first step requires us to compare the fair value of our reporting unitsunit to the carrying value of the net assets of the respective reporting units,unit, including goodwill. If the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value, goodwill of the reporting unit is potentially impaired and we then complete step two to measure the impairment loss, if any. The second step requires the calculation of the implied fair value of goodwill, which is the residual fair value remaining after deducting the fair value of all tangible and intangible net assets of the reporting unit from the fair


value of the reporting unit. If the implied fair value of goodwill is less than the carrying amount of goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized equal to the difference.
Indefinite-lived intangible assets are tested for impairment by comparing their fair values to their carrying values.
In our annual test of An impairment incharge is recorded if the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, we identified indicators of impairment including a decline in market capitalization and continuing losses from operations. We performed impairment tests to determine the recoverability of the carrying values of the assets or if impairment should be measured. We were required to make estimates of theestimated fair value of oursuch assets has decreased below their carrying value.
Other Intangible Assets
Other intangible assets consist of finite-lived intangible assets including acquired non-compete agreements and all assets of CBI, the reporting unit. As a result of these impairment tests, we determined that our trademarks acquired in connection with the CBI acquisition were impaired and that the carrying value of all of the assets of CBI excluding goodwill exceededcustomer relationships. These are amortized over their estimated fair values resulting in an implied fair value of zero for CBI's goodwill. Accordingly, in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, we recorded total impairment charges of $5.6 million including $5.1 million in impairment losses on goodwill, which is included in operating expenses. As of June 30, 2012, goodwill was written down to zero.
In our annual test of impairment in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013, we determined that the book value of a certain trademark acquired in connection with the DSD Coffee Business acquisition was higher than the present value of the estimated future cash flowsuseful lives and concluded that the trademark was impaired. As a result, we recorded an impairment charge of $0.1 million to earnings in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013.
Long-Lived Assets, Excluding Goodwill and Indefinite-lived Intangible Assets
We review the recoverability of our long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. Long-lived assets evaluatedare tested for impairment are groupedby grouping them with other assets toat the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent of the cash flows of other groups of assets and liabilities. The estimated future cash flows are based upon, among other things, assumptions about expected future operating performance and may differ from actual cash flows. If the sum of the projected undiscounted cash flows (excluding interest) is less than the carrying value of the assets, the assets will be written down to the estimated fair value in the period in which the determination is made. InWe review the recoverability of our annual testlong-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of impairment as of the end of fiscal 2011, we determined that definite-lived intangiblesuch assets consisting of the customer relationships acquired, and the distribution agreement and co-pack agreement entered into, in connection with the DSD Coffee Business acquisition were impaired. As a result, in fiscal 2011 we recorded an impairment charge of $7.8 million in operating expenses.may not be recoverable.
Self-Insurance
We are self-insureduse a combination of insurance and self-insurance mechanisms, including the use of captive insurance entities and participation in a reinsurance treaty, to provide for Californiathe potential liability of certain risks including workers’ compensation, health care benefits, general liability, product liability, property insurance subject to specific retention levels and usedirector and officers’ liability insurance. Liabilities associated with risks retained by us are not discounted and are estimated by considering historical analysis to determineclaims experience, demographics, exposure and record the estimates of expected future expenses resulting fromseverity factors and other actuarial assumptions.
Our self-insurance for workers’ compensation claims. Theliability includes estimated outstanding losses are the accrued cost of unpaid claims valued as of June 30, 2013. The estimated outstanding losses, includingand allocated loss adjustment expenses (“ALAE”), include case reserves, the development of known claims and incurred but not reported claims. ALAE are the direct expenses for settling specific claims. The amounts reflect per occurrence and annual aggregate limits maintained by the Company. The estimated liability analysis does not include estimating a provision for unallocated loss adjustment expenses.
In fiscal 2013, we increased our estimate of expected future expenses resulting from workers’ compensation claims by $1.3 million. Management believes We believe that the amount recorded at June 30, 20132016 is adequate to cover all known workers' compensation claims at

22



June 30, 2013.2016. If the actual costs of such claims and related expenses exceed the amount estimated, additional reserves may be required which could have a material negative effect on operating results. If our estimate were off by as much as 15%, the reserve could be under or overstated by approximately $1.0 million as of June 30, 2013.
In May 2011, we did not meet the minimum credit rating criteria for participation in the alternative security program for California self-insurers. As a result, we were required to post a $5.9 million letter of credit as a security deposit to the State of California Department of Industrial Relations Self-Insurance Plans. As of June 30, 2013, this letter of credit continues to serve as a security deposit and has been reduced to $5.4 million.
Estimated Company liability resulting from our general liability and automobile liability policies, within our deductible limits, is accounted for by specific identification. Large losses have historically been infrequent, and the lag between incurred but not reported claims has historically been short. Once a potential loss has been identified, the case is monitored by our risk manager to try and determine a likely outcome. Lawsuits arising from injury that are expected to reach our deductible are not reserved until we have consulted with legal counsel, become aware of the likely amount of loss and determined when payment is expected.
The estimated liability related to our self-insured group medical insurance is recorded on an incurred but not reported basis, within deductible limits, based on actual claims and the average lag time between the date insurance claims are filed and the date those claims are paid. General liability, product liability and commercial auto liability are insured through a captive insurance program. We retain the risk within certain aggregate amounts. Cost of the insurance through the captive program is accrued based on estimates of the aggregate liability claims incurred using certain actuarial assumptions and historical claims experience.
RetirementEmployee Benefit Plans
We provide benefit plans for most full-time employees, including 401(k), health and other welfare benefit plans and, in certain circumstances, pension benefits. Generally the plans provide benefits based on years of service and/or a combination of years of service and earnings. In addition, we contribute to two multiemployer defined benefit pension plans, one multiemployer defined contribution pension plan and ten multiemployer defined contribution plans other than pension plans that provide medical, vision, dental and disability benefits for active, union-represented employees subject to collective bargaining agreements. In addition, we sponsor a postretirement defined benefit plan that covers qualified non-union retirees and certain qualified union retirees and provides retiree medical coverage and, depending on the age of the retiree, dental and vision coverage. We also provide a postretirement death benefit to certain of our employees and retirees.
We are required to recognize the funded status of a benefit plan in our consolidated balance sheet. We are also required to recognize in OCI certain gains and losses that arise during the period but are deferred under pension accounting rules.


Single Employer Pension Plans
We have a defined benefit pension plan, the Farmer Bros. Co. Pension Plan for Salaried Employees Pension Plan (the “Farmer Bros. Plan”), for the majority of our employees hired prior to January 1, 2010 who are not covered under a collective bargaining agreement, and two defined benefit pension plans for certain hourly employees covered under collective bargaining agreements (the "Brewmatic Plan" and the "Hourly Employees’ Plan"). In addition, we contribute to a multiemployer defined benefit pension plan and a multiemployer defined contribution plan for certain union employees.
In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013, we determined that we would shut down our equipment refurbishment operations in Los Angeles, California and move them to our Oklahoma City distribution center effective August 30, 2013. Due to this shut down, all hourly employees responsible for these operations in Los Angeles were terminated and their pension benefits in the Brewmatic Plan were frozen effective August 30, 2013. As a result, we recorded a pension curtailment expense of $34,000 in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013 which is included in “Selling expenses” in our consolidated statement of operations for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013 and in "Accrued pension liabilities" on our consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2013.
agreement. We amended the Farmer Bros. Plan, freezing the benefit for all participants effective June  30, 2011. After the plan freeze, participants do not accrue any benefits under the plan,Farmer Bros. Plan, and new hires are not eligible to participate in the plan. However, account balances continue to be credited with interest until paid out. As a result, we recorded a pension curtailment expense of $1.5 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011 for the Farmer Bros. Plan. As all plan participants became inactive following this pension curtailment, net (gain) loss is now amortized based on the remaining life expectancy of these participants instead of the remaining service period of these participants. Beginning in fiscal 2012,
We also have two defined benefit pension expense is significantly lower than in prior fiscal years due to this curtailment.plans for certain hourly employees covered under collective bargaining agreements (the “Brewmatic Plan” and the “Hourly Employees’ Plan”).
We obtain actuarial valuations for our plans and insingle employer defined benefit pension plans. In fiscal 20132016 we discounted the pension obligations using a 4.5%4.40% discount rate and we estimated an 8.0%7.50% expected long-term rate of return on plan assets. The performance of the stock market and other investments as well as the overall health of the economy can have a material effect on pension investment returns and these assumptions. A change in these assumptions could affect our operating results.
At June 30, 2013,2016, the projected benefit obligation under our single employer defined benefit pension plans was $132.2$161.2 million and the fair value of plan assets was $92.4 million.$96.6 million. The difference between the projected benefit obligation and the fair value of plan assets is recognized as a decrease in OCI and an increase in pension liability and deferred tax assets. The difference between plan obligations and assets, or the funded status of the plans, significantly affects the net periodic benefit costscost and ongoing funding requirements of those plans. Among other factors, changes in interest rates, mortality rates, early retirement rates, mix of plan asset investments, investment returns and the market value of plan assets can affect the level of plan funding, cause volatility in the net periodic benefit cost, and increase our future funding requirements.requirements and require premium payments to the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation. For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013,2016, we made $1.8$1.6 million in contributions to theseour single employer defined benefit pension plans and accruedrecorded pension expense of $1.2 million in expense.million. We expect to make approximately $1.3$2.3 million in contributions to our single employer defined benefit pension plans in fiscal 20142017 and accrue pension expense of approximately $0.7$1.7 million per year beginning in fiscal 2014.2017. These pension paymentscontributions are expected to continue at this level for several years, andyears; however a deterioration in the current economic environment increaseswould increase the risk that we may be required to make even larger contributions in the future.

23




The following chart quantifies the effect on the projected benefit obligation and the net periodic benefit cost of a change in the discount rate assumption and the impact on the net periodic benefit cost of a change in the assumed rate of return on plan assets under our single employer defined benefit pension plans for fiscal 2014:2017: 
 (Dollars in thousands)
($ in thousands)      
Farmer Bros. Plan Discount Rate 4.0% Actual 4.5% 5.0% 3.1% Actual 3.55% 4.1%
Net periodic benefit cost $354
 $316
 $265
 $983
 $1,086
 $1,159
Projected benefit obligation $134,844
 $126,205
 $118,424
 $162,790
 $152,324
 $142,921
            
Farmer Bros. Plan Rate of Return 7.5% Actual 8.0% 8.5% 7.3% Actual 7.75% 8.3%
Net periodic benefit cost $743
 $316
 $(112) $1,529
 $1,086
 $642
            
Brewmatic Plan Discount Rate 4.0% Actual 4.5% 5.0% 3.1% Actual 3.55% 4.1%
Net periodic benefit cost $14
 $16
 $17
 $68
 $71
 $73
Projected benefit obligation $4,164
 $3,946
 $3,749
 $4,856
 $4,575
 $4,327
            
Brewmatic Plan Rate of Return 7.5% Actual 8.0% 8.5% 7.3% Actual 7.75% 8.3%
Net periodic benefit cost $30
 $16
 $1
 $85
 $71
 $56
            
Hourly Employees’ Plan Discount Rate 4.0% Actual 4.5% 5.0% 3.1% Actual 3.55% 4.1%
Net periodic benefit cost $441
 $403
 $374
 $606
 $530
 $462
Projected benefit obligation $2,232
 $2,056
 $1,900
 $4,725
 $4,329
 $3,980
            
Hourly Employees' Plan Rate of Return 7.5% Actual 8.0% 8.5% 7.3% Actual 7.75% 8.3%
Net periodic benefit cost $409
 $403
 $396
 $543
 $530
 $517
Multiemployer Pension Plans
We participate in two multiemployer defined benefit pension plans that are union sponsored and collectively bargained for the benefit of certain employees subject to collective bargaining agreements. We make contributions to these plans generally based on the number of hours worked by the participants in accordance with the provisions of negotiated labor contracts.
The risks of participating in multiemployer pension plans are different from single-employer plans in that: (i) assets contributed to a multiemployer plan by one employer may be used to provide benefits to employees of other participating employers; (ii) if a participating employer stops contributing to the plan, the unfunded obligations of the plan may be borne by the remaining participating employers; and (iii) if we stop participating in the multiemployer plan, we may be required to pay the plan an amount based on the underfunded status of the plan, referred to as a withdrawal liability.
Postretirement Benefits
We sponsor a postretirement defined benefit plan that covers qualified non-union retirees and certain qualified union retirees. The plan provides medical, dental and vision coverage for retirees under age 65 and medical coverage only for retirees age 65 and above. Under this postretirement plan, our contributions toward premiums for retiree medical, dental and vision coverage for participants and dependents are scaled based on length of service, with greater Company contributions for retirees with greater length of service, subject to a maximum monthly Company contribution. Our retiree medical, dental and vision plan is unfunded, and its liability was calculated using an assumed discount rate of 3.7% at June 30, 2016. We project an initial medical trend rate of 9.0% in fiscal 2016, ultimately reducing to 4.5% in 10 years.
We also provide a postretirement death benefit to certain of our employees and retirees, subject, in the case of current employees, to continued employment with the Company until retirement, and certain other conditions related to the manner of employment termination and manner of death. We record the actuarially determined liability for the present value of the postretirement death benefit using a discount rate of 3.8%. We have purchased life insurance policies to fund the


postretirement death benefit wherein we own the policy but the postretirement death benefit is paid to the employee's or retiree's beneficiary. We record an asset for the fair value of the life insurance policies which equates to the cash surrender value of the policies.
Share-based Compensation
We measure all share-based compensation cost at the grant date, based on the fair values of the awards that are ultimately expected to vest, and recognize that cost on a straight line basis in our consolidated statements of operations over the requisite service period. Fair value of restricted stock is the closing price of the Company's common stock on the date of grant. We estimate the fair value of stock option awards on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes valuation model which requires that we make certain assumptions regarding: (i) the expected volatility in the market price of our common stock; (ii) dividend yield; (iii) risk-free interest rate; and (iv) the period of time employees are expected to hold the award prior to exercise (referred to as the expected term).
The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. Because our stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options, and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimates, in management’s opinion, the existing models may not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of our stock options. Although the fair value of stock options is determined using an option valuation model, that value may not be indicative of the fair value observed in a willing buyer/willing seller market transaction.
In addition, we estimate the expected impact of forfeited awards and recognize share-based compensation cost only for those awards ultimately expected to vest. If actual forfeiture rates differ materially from our estimates, share-based compensation expense could differ significantly from the amounts we have recorded in the current period. We will periodically review actual forfeiture experience and revise our estimates, as necessary. We will recognize as compensation cost the cumulative effect of the change in estimated forfeiture rates on current and prior periods in earnings of the period of revision. As a result, if we revise our assumptions and estimates, our share-based compensation expense could change materially in the future. In each of fiscal 2016 and 2015, we used an estimated annual forfeiture rate of 4.8% to calculate share-based compensation expense based on actual forfeiture experience.
We have outstanding share-based awards that have performance-based vesting conditions in addition to time-based vesting. Awards with performance-based vesting conditions require the achievement of certain financial and other performance criteria as a condition to the vesting. We recognize the estimated fair value of performance-based awards, net of estimated forfeitures, as share-based compensation expense over the performance period based upon our determination of whether it is probable that the performance targets will be achieved. At each reporting period, we reassess the probability of achieving the performance criteria and the performance period required to meet those targets. Determining whether the performance criteria will be achieved involves judgment, and the estimate of share-based compensation expense may be revised periodically based on changes in the probability of achieving the performance criteria. Revisions are reflected in the period in which the estimate is changed. If performance goals are not met, no share-based compensation expense is recognized, and, to the extent share-based compensation expense was previously recognized, such share-based compensation expense is reversed.
Income Taxes
Deferred income taxes are determined based on the temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Estimating our tax liabilities involves judgments related to uncertainties in the application of complex tax regulations. We make certain estimates and judgments to determine tax expense for financial statement purposes as we evaluate the effect of tax credits, tax benefits and deductions, some of which result from differences in the timing of recognition of revenue or expense for tax and financial statement purposes. Changes to these estimates may result in significant changes to our tax provision in future periods. Each fiscal quarter we reevaluatere-evaluate our tax provision and reconsider our estimates and assumptions related to specific tax assets and liabilities, making adjustments as circumstances change.


Deferred Tax Asset Valuation Allowance
We assessevaluate our deferred tax assets quarterly to determine if a valuation allowance is required. We consider whether a valuation allowance should be recorded against deferred tax assets based on the likelihood that the benefits of the deferred tax assets will or will not ultimately be realized in future periods. In making suchthis assessment, significant weight is to be given to evidence that can be objectively verified, such as recent operating results, and less consideration is to be given to less objective indicators, such as future earningsincome projections.
After consideration of positive and negative evidence, including the recent history of losses,income, we cannot concludeconcluded that it is more likely than not that we will generate future earningsincome sufficient to realize our the majority of our deferred tax assets as of June 30, 2013.2016. Accordingly, a valuation allowance of $82.5 million has been recorded to offset this deferred tax asset. The valuation allowance increased by $3.1 million, $20.7 million and $13.3 million in the fiscal years ended June 30, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Deferred tax assets were $84.7 million as of June 30, 2013 compared to $83.1 million in fiscal 2012 and $67.1 million in fiscal 2011. In fiscal 2012, deferred tax assets increased primarily due to net loss carryovers and a decrease in expected pension asset values related to a change in actuarial assumptions.
Postretirement Benefits
We sponsor a postretirement defined benefit plan that covers qualified non-union retirees and certain qualified union retirees. The plan provides medical, dental and vision coverage for retirees under age 65 and medical coverage only for retirees age 65 and above. Under this postretirement plan, our contributions toward premiums for retiree medical, dental and vision coverage for participants and dependents are scaled based on length of service, with greater Company contributions for retirees

24



with greater length of service, but subject to a maximum monthly Company contribution. Our retiree medical, dental and vision plan is unfunded and its liability was calculated using an assumed discount rate of 4.8% at June 30, 2013. We project an initial medical trend rate of 7.0% in fiscal 2013, and 6.5% in fiscal 2014, ultimately reducing to 5.0% in 4 years.
We also provide a postretirement death benefit to certain of our employees and retirees, subject, in the case of current employees, to continued employment with the Company until retirement, and certain other conditions related to the manner of employment termination and manner of death. We record the actuarially determined liability for the present value of the postretirement death benefit. We have purchased life insurance policies to fund the postretirement death benefit wherein we own the policy but the postretirement death benefit is paid to the employee's or retiree's beneficiary. We record an asset for the fair value of the life insurance policies which equates to the cash surrender value of the policies.
Share-based Compensation
We measure all share-based compensation cost at the grant date, based on the fair value of the award, and recognize such cost as an expense in our consolidated statements of operations over the requisite service period. The process of estimating the fair value of share-based compensation awards and recognizing share-based compensation cost over the requisite service period involves significant assumptions and judgments. We estimate the fair value of stock option awards on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes valuation model which requires that we make certain assumptions regarding: (i) the expected volatility in the market price of our common stock; (ii) dividend yield; (iii) risk-free interest rates; and (iv) the period of time employees are expected to hold the award prior to exercise (referred to as the expected holding period). In addition, we estimate the expected impact of forfeited awards and recognize share-based compensation cost only for those awards ultimately expected to vest. If actual forfeiture rates differ materially from our estimates, share-based compensation expense could differ significantly from the amounts we have recorded in the current period. We will periodically review actual forfeiture experience and revise our estimates, as necessary. We will recognize as compensation cost the cumulative effect of the change in estimated forfeiture rates on current and prior periods in earnings of the period of revision. As a result, if we revise our assumptions and estimates, our share-based compensation expense could change materially in the future. In fiscal 2013 and 2012, we used an estimated 6.5% annual forfeiture rate to calculate share-based compensation expense based on actual forfeiture experience from the inception of the Omnibus Plan.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Credit Facility
On September 12, 2011, we entered into an Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement (the “Loan Agreement”) among the Company and CBI, as Borrowers, certain of the Company’s other subsidiaries, as Guarantors, the Lenders party thereto, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association ("Wells Fargo"), as Agent.
On January 9, 2012, the Loan Agreement was amended in connection with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“JPMorgan Chase”), becoming an additional Lender thereunder. On March 18, 2013, the Loan Agreement was amended further (“Amendment No. 2") to amend the definition of "Maximum Credit" available thereunder to $75.0 million from $85.0 million. Pursuant to Amendment No. 2, Wells Fargo will provide a commitment of $53.0 million and JPMorgan Chase will provide a commitment of $22.0 million.
The Loan Agreement provides for a senior secured revolving credit facility of up to $75.0 million, with a letter of credit sublimit of $20.0 million. The revolving credit facility provides for advances of 85% of eligible accounts receivable and 75% of eligible inventory (subject to a $60.0 million inventory loan limit), as defined. The Loan Agreement provides for interest rates based on modified Monthly Average Excess Availability levels with a range of PRIME + 0.25% to PRIME + 0.75% or Adjusted Eurodollar Rate + 2.0% to Adjusted Eurodollar Rate + 2.5%. The Loan Agreement has an amendment fee of 0.375% and an unused line fee of 0.25%. Outstanding obligations under the Loan Agreement are collateralized by all of the Borrowers’ assets, including the Company’s preferred stock portfolio. The term of the Loan Agreement expires on March 2, 2015.
The Loan Agreement contains a variety of affirmative and negative covenants of types customary in an asset-based lending facility, including those relating to reporting requirements, maintenance of records, properties and corporate existence, compliance with laws, incurrence of other indebtedness and liens, limitations on certain payments, including the payment of dividends and capital expenditures, and transactions and extraordinary corporate events. The Loan Agreement allows us to pay dividends, provided, among other things, certain liquidity requirements are met, the aggregate amount of all such payments in any fiscal year shall not exceed $7.0 million ($1.75 million in any fiscal quarter), and no event of default exists or has occurred and is continuing as of the date of any such payment and after giving effect thereto. The Loan Agreement also contains financial covenants requiring the Borrowers to maintain minimum Excess Availability and Total Liquidity levels. The Loan Agreement allows the Lenders to establish reserve requirements, which may reduce the amount of credit otherwise available to

25



us, to reflect events, conditions, or risks that would have a reasonable likelihood of adversely affecting the Lender’s collateral or our assets, including our green coffee inventory.
The Loan Agreement provides that an event of default includes, among other things, subject to certain grace periods: (i) payment defaults; (ii) failure by any guarantor to perform any guarantee in favor of Lender; (iii) failure to abide by loan covenants; (iv) default with respect to other material indebtedness; (v) final judgment in a material amount not discharged or stayed; (vi) any change of control; (vii) bankruptcy or insolvency; and (viii) the failure of the Farmer Bros. Co. Employee Stock Ownership Benefit Trust, created by the Company to implement the Farmer Bros. Co. Employee Stock Ownership Plan ("ESOP"), to be duly qualified under Section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or exempt from federal income taxation, or if the ESOP engages in a material non-exempt prohibited transaction.
Effective December 1, 2012, we entered into an interest rate swap transaction utilizing a notional amount of $10.0 million and a maturity date of March 1, 2015. We entered into the swap transaction to effectively fix the future interest rate during the applicable period on a portion of our borrowings under the revolving credit facility. The swap transaction is intended to manage our interest rate risk related to our borrowings under the revolving credit facility and requires us to pay a fixed rate of 0.48% per annum in exchange for a variable interest rate based on 1-month USD LIBOR-BBA. As of June 30, 2013, the variable interest rate based on 1-month USD LIBOR-BBA was 0.19%.
We have not designated our interest rate swap as an accounting hedge. We record the interest rate swap on our consolidated balance sheet at fair value with the changes in fair value recorded as gain or loss in “Other, net” in our consolidated statements of operations. In fiscal 2013, we recorded a loss of $25,000 for the changereduction in fair value of our interest rate swap. No such gains or losses were recordedvaluation allowance in fiscal 2012.
On June 30, 2013, we were eligible to borrow up to a total of $61.7 million under the credit facility. As of June 30, 2013, we had outstanding borrowings of $19.8 million, including loan extension fees of $0.1 million, utilized $11.6 million of the letters of credit sublimit, and had excess availability under the credit facility of $30.3 million. In connection with entering into the interest rate swap agreement, we reclassified $10.0 million of our borrowings under the credit facility as long-term because we intend to repay the borrowings in accordance with the termination date of the swap agreement which extends beyond one year. The weighted average interest rate on our outstanding borrowings under the credit facility was 1.37% at June 30, 2013. We believe that the carrying value of our outstanding borrowings under the credit facility approximates fair value at June 30, 2013 as the credit facility bears interest at a variable interest rate based on prevailing market conditions.
As of June 30, 2013, we were in compliance with all restrictive covenants under the Loan Agreement. On October 3, 2013, we and Wells Fargo entered into a Letter Agreement regarding Waiver of Event of Default (the “Waiver Agreement”) pursuant to which Wells Fargo, as Agent, and the Lenders agreed to waive the event of default arising under the Loan Agreement as a result of our failure to furnish, in a timely manner, our audited consolidated financial statements and unaudited consolidating financial statements, and the accompanying notes thereto, together with the unqualified opinion of independent certified public accountants with respect to the audited consolidated financial statements, for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013; provided that we furnish to Agent such financial information not later than October 15, 2013. There can be no assurance that the Lenders will issue a waiver or grant an amendment to the covenants in future periods, if the Company required one.
As of September 30, 2013, we had estimated outstanding borrowings of $20.3 million, including loan extension fees of $0.1 million, utilized $11.2 million of the letters of credit sublimit, and had excess availability under the credit facility of $36.8 million. As of September 30, 2013, the weighted average interest rate on our outstanding borrowings under the credit facility was 1.7%.
Liquidity
We generally finance our operations through cash flow from operations and borrowings under our revolving credit facility described above. As of June 30, 2013, we had $2.7 million in cash and cash equivalents, $8.1 million in restricted cash representing cash held on deposit in margin accounts for coffee-related derivative instruments and $20.5 million in short-term investments. We believe our revolving credit facility, to the extent available, in addition to our cash flows from operations and other liquid assets, are sufficient to fund our working capital and capital expenditure requirements for the next 12 months.
We generate cash from operating activities primarily from cash collections related to the sale of our products. Net cash provided by operating activities was $21.9 million in fiscal 2013 compared to $18.1 million in fiscal 2012 and $33.9 million in fiscal 2011. The increase in net cash provided by operating activities in fiscal 2013 compared to the prior fiscal year was primarily due to lower net loss in fiscal 2013 compared to fiscal 2012.

26



Net cash used in investing activities decreased to $10.2 million in fiscal 2013 compared to $14.5 million in fiscal 2012 and $17.4 million in fiscal 2011, primarily due to reduced levels of capital expenditures. In fiscal 2013, cash inflow from sales of fixed assets, primarily real estate, was $5.7 million and cash outflow for capital expenditures was $15.9 million. In fiscal 2012, cash inflow from sales of fixed assets, primarily real estate, was $3.0 million and cash outflow for capital expenditures was $17.5 million. In fiscal 2011, cash inflow from sales of fixed assets, primarily real estate, was $2.0 million and cash outflow for capital expenditures was $19.4 million.
Net cash used in financing activities was $12.9 million in fiscal 2013 compared to $5.8 million in fiscal 2012 and $14.6 million in fiscal 2011. Net cash used in financing activities in fiscal 2013 included net repayments on our credit facility of $10.8 million, partially offset by $1.2 million in proceeds from stock option exercises, compared to net repayments of $4.0 million and $8.5 million in fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2011, respectively. In addition, there were no dividend payments in fiscal 2013 and fiscal 2012, compared to dividend payments of $4.7 million in fiscal 2011.
In fiscal 2013, we capitalized $15.9 million in property, plant and equipment purchases which included $9.3 million in expenditures to replace normal wear and tear of coffee brewing equipment, $0.5 million in building and facility improvements, $5.0 million in expenditures for vehicles, and machinery and equipment, and $1.1 million in information technology related expenditures.
Our expected capital expenditures for fiscal 2014 include expenditures to replace normal wear and tear of coffee brewing equipment, vehicles, and machinery and equipment, and are expected to increase approximately 33% from fiscal 2013 levels.
Our working capital is comprised of the following:
  June 30,
  2013 2012
    As Restated
  (In thousands)
Current assets $139,749
 $136,178
Current liabilities(1) 76,550
 86,737
Working capital $63,199
 $49,441
__________
(1) Includes $9.9 million in coffee-related short-term derivative liability in fiscal 2013.
Liquidity Information:
  June 30,
  2013 2012 2011
    As Restated As Restated
  (In thousands)
Capital expenditures $15,894
 $17,498
 $19,416
Dividends paid $
 $
 $4,657
Results of Operations
Fiscal Years Ended June 30, 2013 and 2012
Overview
In fiscal 2013, green coffee commodity prices continued to fall but fuel costs remained high. Green coffee commodity market prices fell from $1.70 per pound at the end of fiscal 2012 to $1.20 per pound at the end of fiscal 2013. In fiscal 2013 we continued our hedging strategy intended to establish predictable prices for future supply of green coffee with futures contracts that we purchase for certain of our national account customers and for our own account for longer periods of time than was done previously because the cost of coffee significantly declined during the last 12 to 18 months, making these long-term futures contracts relatively less expensive than they had been previously. Net unrealized and realized losses relating to coffee-related derivatives which are not designated as accounting hedges, in accordance with GAAP, are recognized immediately in our consolidated statements of operations as the derivative contracts are re-valued to their market prices. These losses are expected to be offset by future derivative gains as the coffee market changes, recovered through operating income as a result of the lower cost of goods assigned to the related coffee or recovered from customers for whom contracts were purchased for their accounts. Beginning April 1, 2013, we implemented procedures following the guidelines of ASC 815 to

27



enable us to account for certain coffee-related derivatives as accounting hedges in order to minimize the volatility created in our quarterly results from utilizing these derivative contracts and to improve comparability between reporting periods. As a result, beginning in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013, a portion of the gains and losses from re-valuing the coffee-related derivative contracts to their market prices is being recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) on our consolidated balance sheet and reclassified to cost of goods sold when the hedged transaction affects earnings. To address the increase in freight and fuel expense, the energy surcharge instituted in fiscal 2011 and 2012 continued in fiscal 2013.
In fiscal 2013, we invested in additional sales and marketing training and product re-branding. We also launched the Artisan Collection by Farmer Brothers™, our premium line of coffees, and the new Farmer Brothers teas. During fiscal 2013, we completed the integration of certain key functions including marketing, green coffee management, national sales and human resources at our Portland and Torrance facilities. We also continued to improve our real-estate asset management by divesting underutilized properties.
Operations
Net sales in fiscal 2013 increased $14.6 million, or 2.9%, to $510.0 million from $495.4 million in fiscal 2012, primarily due to increases in sales of our coffee and tea products.
Cost of goods sold in fiscal 2013 decreased $3.7 million, or 1.1%, to $318.8 million, or 62.5% of net sales, from $322.5 million, or 65.1% of net sales, in fiscal 2012. The decrease in cost of goods sold as a percentage of net sales in fiscal 2013 is primarily due to a 30.8% decrease in the average cost of green coffee purchased and a reduction in inventory, which resulted in the liquidation of LIFO inventory quantities carried at lower costs prevailing in prior years. The beneficial effect of this liquidation of LIFO inventory quantities reduced cost of goods sold by $1.1 million compared to $14.2 million in the prior fiscal year.
Gross profit in fiscal 2013 increased $18.2 million, or 10.5%, to $191.1 million from $172.9 million in fiscal 2012. Gross margin increased to 37.5% in fiscal 2013 from 34.9% in the prior fiscal year. The increases in gross profit and gross margin were primarily due to the increase in sales and a 31% decrease in the average cost of green coffee purchased in fiscal 2013.
In fiscal 2013, operating expenses increased $0.2 million, or 0.1%, to $195.2 million, or 38.3% of net sales, from $195.0 million, or 39.4% of net sales, in fiscal 2012. The increase in operating expenses in fiscal 2013 is primarily due to a $10.2 million increase in expenses primarily from our investments in additional sales and marketing training, expenses related to the launch of the Artisan Collection by Farmer Brothersand the new Farmer Brothers teas, higher startup costs associated with the increase in national account customers, higher expenses related to severance and storm-related losses in our Moonachie, Oklahoma City and Houston distribution centers, partially offset by a $10.0 million decrease in losses from impairment of goodwill and intangible assets, and pension withdrawal expense.
In our annual test of impairment in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013, we determined that the book value of a certain trademark acquired in connection with the DSD Coffee Business acquisition was higher than the present value of the estimated future cash flows and concluded that the trademark was impaired. As a result, we recorded an impairment charge of $0.1 million to earnings in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013.
In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013, we determined that we would shut down our equipment refurbishment operations in Los Angeles, California and move them to our Oklahoma City distribution center effective August 30, 2013. Due to this shut down, all hourly employees responsible for these operations in Los Angeles were terminated and their pension benefits in the Brewmatic Plan were frozen effective August 30, 2013. As a result, we recorded a pension curtailment expense of $34,000 in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013 which is included in "Selling expenses" in our consolidated statement of operations for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013 and in "Accrued pension liabilities" on our consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2013.
Loss from operations in fiscal 2013 was $(4.1) million compared to $(22.1) million in fiscal 2012, primarily due to the improvement in gross profit.
Total other income (expense)
Total other expense in fiscal 2013 was $5.2 million compared to $4.8 million in fiscal 2012, primarily due to higher net losses on derivatives and investments of $11.1 million in fiscal 2013 compared to $6.2 million in fiscal 2012. The net losses on derivatives and investments were primarily due to net realized and unrealized losses from coffee-related derivative instruments not designated as accounting hedges. Net realized and unrealized losses from coffee-related derivative instruments in fiscal 2013 were $11.3 million compared to $7.3 million in fiscal 2012. The increase in net realized and unrealized coffee-related derivative losses in fiscal 2013 compared to fiscal 2012 is due in large part to the increase in the number offutures contracts

28



combined with a continued decline in coffee commodity costs in fiscal 2013. There was a significant increase in the number of our coffee-related derivative contracts as of June 30, 2013 covering 49.6 million pounds of green coffee compared to 18.2 million pounds of green coffee covered as of June 30, 2012. The increase in the number of such contracts is primarily due to the increase in the number of our national account customers since a majority of the contracts are purchased for their accounts. Additionally, during the first three quarters in fiscal 2013, when none of our coffee-related derivative instruments was designated as an accounting hedge, we recognized in our consolidated statements of operations, the net unrealized and realized losses from the continuing decline in green coffee commodity prices below our locked-in prices as the derivative contracts were re-valued to their market prices. We expect such losses to be offset by future derivative gains as the coffee market changes, recovered through operating income as a result of the lower cost of goods assigned to the related coffee or recovered from customers for whom contracts were purchased for their accounts. For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, we recognized $0.4 million in losses on coffee-related derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges due to ineffectiveness.
Total other expense in fiscal 2013 included $4.5 million in net gains from sales of assets, primarily real estate, compared to $1.4 million in net gains from sales of assets, primarily real estate, in fiscal 2012. Total other expense in fiscal 2013 also included $0.8 million in recovery of an account previously deemed uncollectable.
Income taxes
In fiscal 2013, we recorded an income tax benefit of $0.8 million compared to $0.3 million in fiscal 2012. Income tax benefit for fiscal 2013 was primarily attributable to the gain on postretirement benefits. Income tax expense or benefit from continuing operations is generally determined without regard to other categories of earnings, such as discontinued operations and OCI. An exception is provided in ASC 740, "Tax Provisions" ("ASC 740"), when there is aggregate income from categories other than continuing operations and a loss from continuing operations in the current year. In this case, the income tax benefit allocated to continuing operations is the amount by which the loss from continuing operations reduces the income tax expense recorded with respect to the other categories of earnings, even when a valuation allowance has been established against the deferred tax assets. In instances where a valuation allowance is established against current year losses, income from other sources, including gain from postretirement benefits recorded as a component of OCI, is considered when determining whether sufficient future taxable income exists to realize the deferred tax assets. As a result, for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, we recorded income tax expense of $1.1 million in OCI related to the gain on postretirement benefits, and recorded a corresponding income tax benefit of $1.1 million in continuing operations.  
Income tax benefit for fiscal 2012 was primarily attributable to the settlement of certain tax issues with the Internal Revenue Service and the State of California during our exam appeals.  In fiscal 2012, unrecognized tax benefits related to certain tax refunds were released and the resulting benefit was recorded. 
Net Loss
As a result of the foregoing factors, net loss decreased to $(8.5) million, or $(0.54) per common share, in fiscal 2013 from $(26.6) million, or $(1.72) per common share, in fiscal 2012.
Fiscal Years Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011
Overview
In fiscal 2012, commodity prices remained high through the first half of the fiscal year and started to fall during the second half of the fiscal year, with the exception of fuel costs which remained high throughout fiscal 2012. We utilized several strategies to minimize the impact of increasing green coffee prices, including the purchase of future coffee contracts, in some instances, up to 18 months in advance of the actual delivery date, to enable us to lock-in green coffee prices within a pre-established range. Although this strategy minimizes the impact of increasing green coffee prices, if green coffee prices decline after we lock the purchase cost, the cost of our purchases reflected in our financial results may be higher compared to the prevailing market cost of green coffee. To address the increase in freight and fuel expense, in fiscal 2011 we instituted an energy surcharge which continued in fiscal 2012.
To address downward margin pressures, we continued to focus on streamlining our operations in fiscal 2012. Specifically, we continued our focus on expense reductions and asset redeployment to improve our operating results. The benefit of initiatives we implemented in fiscal 2011 intended to reduce the cost of our operations, including headcount reduction, inventory reduction, implementation of improved collection practices of past due accounts, cost-sharing measures to address increases in employee healthcare costs, automation of certain functions, centralization of certain IT functions, and in-sourcing of certain business support functions, also started to be realized. In fiscal 2012, we also implemented employee benefit plan

29



restructuring, and continued to improve our real-estate asset management by divesting underutilized properties and renegotiating our lease terms in response to more favorable market conditions in certain markets.
Operations
Net sales in fiscal 2012 increased $31.5 million, or 6.8%, to $495.4 million from $463.9 million in fiscal 2012, primarily due to increases in list prices of our coffee, cappuccino, cocoa and selected spice products implemented in the second half of fiscal 2011, offset in part by the effect of a decrease in the number of customers who purchased our products as compared to the prior fiscal year.
Cost of goods sold in fiscal 2012 increased $16.0 million, or 5.2%, to $322.5 million, or 65.1% of net sales, from $306.5 million, or 66.1% of net sales, in fiscal 2012, primarily due to the increase in net sales. The decrease in cost of goods sold as a percentage of net sales in fiscal 2012 is primarily due to a reduction in coffee inventory, which resulted in the liquidation of LIFO inventory quantities carried at lower costs prevailing in prior years. The beneficial effect of this liquidation of LIFO inventory quantities reduced cost of goods sold by $14.2 million in fiscal 2012 compared to $1.1 million in fiscal 2011. This reduction in cost of goods sold was offset, in part, by a 16% increase in the average cost of green coffee purchased in fiscal 2012 compared to the prior fiscal year.
Gross profit in fiscal 2012 increased $15.4 million, or 9.8%, to $172.9 million from $157.5 million in fiscal 2011. Gross margin increased to 34.9% in fiscal 2012 from 34.0% in the prior fiscal year. The increase in gross profit and gross margin is primarily due to the beneficial effect of the liquidation of LIFO inventory quantities and the full year benefit of price increases for our coffee, cappuccino, cocoa and selected spice products in fiscal 2012, offset by changes in the mix of our customers and the products we sell to them and a 16% increase in the average cost of green coffee purchased in fiscal 2012.
In fiscal 2012, operating expenses decreased $32.9 million, or 14.4%, to $195.0 million, or 39.4% of net sales, from $227.9 million, or 49.1% of net sales, in fiscal 2011. The reduction in operating expenses in fiscal 2012 is primarily due to lower payroll and related expenses resulting from a decreased employee headcount, savings from employee benefit plan restructuring and ongoing cost control measures. The decrease in operating expenses was offset, in part, by impairment losses on goodwill and intangible assets2016 in the amount of $5.6 million and charges related to withdrawal from multiemployer pension plans in the amount of $4.6 million.$83.2 million.
In our annual test of impairment of long-lived assets, we determined that goodwill and certain trademarks acquired in connection with the CBI acquisition were impaired. Accordingly, in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, we recorded total impairment charges of $5.6 million including $5.1 million in impairment losses to write off goodwill.
In fiscal 2012, we withdrew from two multiemployer defined benefit pension plans and recorded a charge of $4.3 million associated with withdrawal from one of these plans, representing the present value of the estimated withdrawal liability expected to be paid in quarterly installments of $0.1 million over 80 quarters. Installment payments will commence once the final determination of the amount of withdrawal liability is established, which determination may take up to 24 months from the date of withdrawal from the pension plan. Upon withdrawal, the employees covered under one of these multiemployer pension plans were included in our 401(k) plan ("401(k) Plan") and the other defined benefit multiemployer pension plan was replaced with a defined contribution pension plan. The $4.3 million withdrawal expense is included in our consolidated statement of operations for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012 as “Pension withdrawal expense” and in current and long-term liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2012. In addition, we recorded $0.3 million in pension withdrawal expense for acquisition-related pension withdrawal liability assumed in connection with the DSD Coffee Business acquisition that was fully paid in fiscal 2012.
Loss from operations in fiscal 2012 was $(22.1) million compared to $(70.4) million in fiscal 2011, due to improvement in gross profit and reduction in operating expenses.
Total other income (expense)
Total other expense in fiscal 2012 was $(4.8) million compared to total other income of $4.9 million in fiscal 2011, primarily due to net derivative losses of $(6.2) million in fiscal 2012 compared to net derivative gains of $1.3 million in fiscal 2011. The net derivative losses and gains were primarily due to coffee-related futures contracts.

30



Income taxes
In fiscal 2012, we recorded an income tax benefit of $0.3 million compared to $13.4 million in fiscal 2011. Income tax benefit for fiscal 2012 was primarily attributable to the settlement of certain tax issues with the Internal Revenue Service and the State of California during our exam appeals.  In fiscal 2012, unrecognized tax benefits related to certain tax refunds were released and the resulting benefit was recorded. 
Income tax benefit for fiscal 2011 was primarily attributable to gains on postretirement benefits.  Income tax expense or benefit from continuing operations is generally determined without regard to other categories of earnings, such as discontinued operations and OCI. An exception is provided in ASC 740 when there is aggregate income from categories other than continuing operations and a loss from continuing operations in the current year. In this case, the income tax benefit allocated to continuing operations is the amount by which the loss from continuing operations reduces the income tax expense recorded with respect to the other categories of earnings, even when a valuation allowance has been established against the deferred tax assets. In instances where a valuation allowance is established against current year losses, income from other sources, including gain from postretirement benefits recorded as a component of OCI, is considered when determining whether sufficient future taxable income exists to realize the deferred tax assets. As a result, for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011, we recorded an income tax expense of $14.1 million in OCI related to the gain on postretirement benefits, and recorded a corresponding income tax benefit of $14.1 million in continuing operations.
Net Loss
As a result of the foregoing factors, net loss decreased to $(26.6) million, or $(1.72) per common share, in fiscal 2012 compared to a net loss of $(52.0) million, or $(3.45) per common share, in fiscal 2011.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
In addition to net income (loss) determined in accordance with GAAP, we use certain non-GAAP financial measures, such as “EBITDAE,” in assessing our operating performance. We believe this non-GAAP measure serves as an appropriate measure to be used in evaluating the performance of our business.
We define “EBITDAE” as net income (loss) excluding the impact of income taxes, interest expense, depreciation and amortization expense, ESOP and share-based compensation expense, non-cash impairment losses, pension withdrawal expense, and "Other, net," which includes net gains and losses from derivatives and investments, and net gains and losses on sales of assets. We reference this particular non-GAAP financial measure frequently in our decision-making because it provides supplemental information that facilitates internal comparisons to the historical operating performance of prior periods. In addition, incentive compensation is based, in part, on EBITDAE and we base certain of our forward-looking estimates on EBITDAE to facilitate quantification of planned business activities and enhance subsequent follow-up with comparisons of actual to planned EBITDAE. EBITDAE as defined by us may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies. We do not intend for non-GAAP financial measures to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for other measures prepared in accordance with GAAP.

31



Set forth below is a reconciliation of reported net loss to EBITDAE:
  Year Ended June 30,
(In thousands) 2013 2012 2011
    As Restated As Restated
Net loss, as reported (1)(2) $(8,462) $(26,576) $(52,033)
Income tax benefit (825) (347) (13,396)
Interest expense 1,782
 2,137
 1,965
Depreciation and amortization expense 32,542
 32,113
 31,758
ESOP and share-based compensation expense 3,563
 3,287
 3,825
Impairment losses on goodwill and intangible assets 92
 5,585
 7,805
Pension withdrawal expense 
 4,568
 
Other, net (2) 4,965
 4,117
 (4,191)
EBITDAE (1)(2) $33,657
 $24,884
 $(24,267)
 ______________
(1)
Includes the beneficial effect of liquidation of LIFO inventory quantities in the amounts of $1.1 million, $14.2 million and $1.1 million in fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
(2)
Includes $4.5 million, $1.4 million and $1.4 million in net gains from sales of assets, primarily real estate, in fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively; excludes in fiscal 2013, $7.9 million in losses from coffee-related derivatives designated as cash flow hedges.

Contractual Obligations
The following table contains information regarding total contractual obligations as of June 30, 2013, including capital leases:
  Payment due by period
(In thousands) Total 
Less Than
One Year
 
1-3
Years
 
3-5
Years
 
More Than
5 Years
Contractual obligations:          
Operating lease obligations $12,594
 $3,868
 $5,281
 $2,612
 $833
Capital lease obligations(1) 13,428
 4,001
 7,068
 2,266
 93
Pension plan obligations 77,534
 6,641
 13,745
 14,705
 42,443
Postretirement benefits other than
    pension plans
 10,707
 640
 1,598
 1,947
 6,522
Revolving credit facility(2) 19,654
 9,654
 10,000
 
 
Purchase commitments (3) 18,583
 18,583
 
 
 
  $152,500
 $43,387
 $37,692
 $21,530
 $49,891
 ______________
(1) Includes imputed interest of $1,260.
(2) Reclassified $10.0 million to long-term borrowings in accordance with the termination date of the swap agreement.
(3) Commitments under coffee purchase contracts for which all delivery terms have been finalized but the related coffee has not been received as of June 30, 2013.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements.

32



Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Interest Rate Risk
We are exposed to market value risk arising from changes in interest rates on our securities portfolio. Our portfolio of preferred securities has sometimes included investments in derivativesderivative instruments that provide a natural economic hedge of interest rate risk. We review the interest rate sensitivity of these securities and may enter into “short positions” in futures contracts on U.S. Treasury securities or hold put options on such futures contracts to reduce the impact of certain interest rate changes. Specifically, we attempt to manage the risk arising from changes in the general level of interest rates. We do not transact in futures contracts or put options for speculative purposes. The number and type of futures and options contracts entered into depends on, among other items, the specific maturity and issuer redemption provisions for each preferred stock held, the slope of the U.S. Treasury yield curve, the expected volatility of U.S. Treasury yields, and the costs of using futures and/or options.
The following table demonstrates the impact of varying interest rate changes based on our preferred securities holdings and market yield and price relationships at June 30, 2013.2016. This table is predicated on an “instantaneous” change in the general level of interest rates and assumes predictable relationships between the prices of our preferred securities holdings and the yields on U.S. Treasury securities. At June 30, 2013,2016, we had no futures contracts or put options with respect to our preferred securities portfolio designated as interest rate risk hedges.
 
Market Value of
Preferred
Securities at 
June 30, 2013
 
Change in  Market
Value
($ in thousands) 
Market Value of
Preferred
Securities at 
June 30, 2016
 
Change in Market
Value
Interest Rate Changes (In thousands)  
–150 basis points $21,309
 $767
 $26,495
 $904
–100 basis points $21,080
 $538
 $26,310
 $719
Unchanged $20,542
 $
 $25,591
 $
+100 basis points $19,909
 $(633) $24,644
 $(947)
+150 basis points $19,600
 $(942) $24,184
 $(1,407)

The Loan Agreement forBorrowings under our revolving credit facility provides forRevolving Facility bear interest rates based on modified Monthly Average Excess Availabilityaverage historical excess availability levels with a range of PRIME - 0.25% to PRIME + 0.25% to PRIME + 0.75%0.50% or Adjusted EurodollarLIBO Rate + 2.0%1.25% to Adjusted EurodollarLIBO Rate + 2.5%2.00%. Effective December 1, 2012, we entered into an interest rate swap transaction utilizing a notional amount of $10.0 million and a maturity date of March 1, 2015. We entered into the swap transaction to effectively fix the future interest rate during the applicable period on a portion of our borrowings under our revolving credit facility. In connection with entering into the interest rate swap agreement, we reclassified $10.0 million of our borrowings under the revolving credit facility as long-term because we intend to repay the borrowings in accordance with the termination date of the swap agreement which extends beyond one year. The swap transaction is intended to manage our interest rate risk related to our borrowings under our revolving credit facility and requires us to pay a fixed rate of 0.48% per annum in exchange for a variable interest rate based on 1-month USD LIBOR-BBA. As of
At June 30, 2013, the variable interest rate based on 1-month USD LIBOR-BBA was 0.19%.
We have not designated our interest rate swap as an accounting hedge. We record the interest rate swap on our consolidated balance sheet at fair value with the changes in fair value recorded as gain or loss in "Other, net" in our consolidated statements of operations. In fiscal 2013, we recorded a loss of $25,000 for the change in fair value of our interest rate swap. No such gain or loss was recorded in fiscal 2012.
As of June 30, 2013,2016, we had outstanding borrowings of $19.8$0.1 million,, including loan extension fees of $0.1 utilized $11.9 million, utilized $11.6 million of the letters of credit sublimit, and had excess availability under the credit facilityRevolving Facility of $30.3 million.$46.6 million. The weighted average interest rate on our outstanding borrowings under the credit facilityRevolving Facility at June 30, 20132016 was 1.37%1.64%.

33



The following table demonstrates the impact of interest rate changes on our annual interest expense under the revolving credit facility based on the outstanding balance and interest rate as of June 30, 2013:
  Interest Rate Annual Interest Expense
Interest Rate Changes   (In thousands)
 –100 basis points 0.37% $73
 –50 basis points 0.87% $172
 Unchanged 1.37% $271
 +50 basis points 1.87% $369
 +100 basis points 2.37% $468
Commodity Price Risk
We are exposed to commodity price risk arising from changes in the market price of green coffee. We value green coffee inventory on the LIFO basis. In the normal course of business we hold a large green coffee inventory and enter into forward commodity purchase agreements with suppliers. We are subject to price risk resulting from the volatility of green


coffee prices. Due to competition and market conditions, volatile price increases cannot always be passed on to our customers.
We routinely purchase exchange tradedover-the-counter coffee contractsderivative instruments to enable us to lock in the price of green coffee prices within a pre-established range, and hold a mixcommodity purchases. These derivative instruments also may be entered into at the direction of futures contracts and optionsthe customer under commodity-based pricing arrangements to help hedge against volatilityeffectively lock in the purchase price of green coffee prices. Priorunder such customer arrangements, in certain cases up to April 1, 2013, none of our derivative instruments was designated as an accounting hedge. Beginning April 1, 2013, we implemented procedures following18 months or longer in the guidelines of ASC 815 to enable us tofuture. We account for certain coffee-related derivativesderivative instruments as accounting hedges in order to minimize the volatility created in our quarterly results from utilizing these derivative contracts and to improve comparability between reporting periods.
When we designate coffee-related futures contracts are designatedderivative instruments as cash flow hedges, we formally document the hedging instruments and hedged items, and measure at each balance sheet date the effectiveness of our hedges. Beginning in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013, theThe effective portion of the change in fair value of the derivative is reported as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (“AOCI”)in AOCI and subsequently reclassified into cost of goods sold in the period or periods when the hedged transaction affects earnings. InFor the fiscal 2013year ended June 30, 2016 we reclassified $55,000$(13.2) million in net losses into cost of goods sold from AOCI. For the fiscal years ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 we reclassified $4.2 million and $1.2 million, respectively, in net gains into cost of goods sold from AOCI. Any ineffective portion of the derivative's change in fair value is recognized currently in “Other, net.” Gains or losses deferred in AOCI associated with terminated derivatives, derivativesderivative instruments, derivative instruments that cease to be highly effective hedges, derivativesderivative instruments for which the forecasted transaction is reasonably possible but no longer probable of occurring, and cash flow hedges that have been otherwise discontinued remain in AOCI until the hedged item affects earnings. If it becomes probable that the forecasted transaction designated as the hedged item in a cash flow hedge will not occur, we recognize any gain or loss deferred in AOCI in “Other, net” at that time. For the fiscal years ended June 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014, we recognized in “Other, net” $(0.6) million, $(0.3) million and $(0.3) million, respectively, in net losses on coffee-related derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges due to ineffectiveness.
For derivative instruments that are not designated in a hedging relationship, and for which the normal purchases and normal sales exception has not been elected, the changes in fair value are reported in “Other, net.”
For the fiscal years ended June 30, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, we recorded in “Other, net” net realized and unrealized losses from(losses) gains on coffee-related derivativesderivative instruments not designated as accounting hedges in "Other, net" in the amounts of $11.3$(0.3) million,, $7.3 $(3.0) million and $1.5$2.7 million,, respectively (see Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements). respectively.
The following table summarizes the potential impact as of June 30, 20132016 to net income and OCIAOCI from a hypothetical 10% change in coffee commodity prices. The information provided below relates only to the coffee-related derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges and does not representinclude, when applicable, the corresponding changes in the underlying hedged items:
   Increase (Decrease) to Net Income Increase (Decrease)  to OCI
 10% Increase in Underlying Rate 10% Decrease in Underlying Rate 10% Increase in Underlying Rate 10% Decrease in Underlying Rate
 
   (In thousands)
 Coffee-related derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges $669
 $(669) $5,510
 $(5,510)
  Increase (Decrease) to Net Income Increase (Decrease) to AOCI
  10% Increase in Underlying Rate 10% Decrease in Underlying Rate 10% Increase in Underlying Rate 10% Decrease in Underlying Rate
(In thousands) 
Coffee-related derivative instruments(1) $118
 $(118) $4,941
 $(4,941)

__________
34(1) The Company's purchase contracts that qualify as normal purchases include green coffee purchase commitments for which the price has been locked in as of June 30, 2016. These contracts are not included in the sensitivity analysis above as the underlying price has been fixed.




Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Farmer Bros. Co. and Subsidiaries
Fort Worth, Texas

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Farmer Bros. Co. and Subsidiariessubsidiaries (the "Company") as of June 30, 20132016 and 2012 (restated),2015 and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 2013, June 30, 2012 (restated) and June 30, 2011 (restated).2016. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on thesethe consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, thesuch consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Farmer Bros. Co. and Subsidiaries atsubsidiaries as of June 30, 20132016 and 2012 (restated),2015, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 2013, June 30, 2012 (restated) and June 30, 2011 (restated),2016, in conformity with U.S.accounting principles generally accepted accounting principles.in the United States of America.

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the June 30, 2012 and 2011 consolidated financial statementsWe have been restated to correct errors for the improper accounting for other postretirement benefit obligations.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Farmer Bros. Co. and Subsidiaries'the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2013,2016, based on the criteria established in Internal Control-IntegratedControl - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (1992 framework) and our report dated October 9, 2013September 13, 2016 expressed an adverseunqualified opinion thereon.on the Company's internal control over financial reporting.


/s/ ErnstDELOITTE & YoungTOUCHE LLP
Los Angeles, CaliforniaDallas, Texas
October 9, 2013September 13, 2016


35




FARMER BROS. CO.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
June 30, 2013 June 30, 2012
  As RestatedJune 30, 2016 June 30, 2015
ASSETS      
Current assets:      
Cash and cash equivalents$2,678
 $3,906
$21,095
 $15,160
Restricted cash8,084
 1,612

 1,002
Short-term investments20,546
 19,736
25,591
 23,665
Accounts and notes receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,115 and $1,872, respectively43,922
 40,736
Accounts and notes receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $714 and $643, respectively44,364
 40,161
Inventories60,867
 65,981
46,378
 50,522
Income tax receivable409
 762
247
 535
Short-term derivative assets3,954
 
Prepaid expenses3,243
 3,445
4,557
 4,640
Assets held for sale7,179
 
Total current assets139,749
 136,178
153,365
 135,685
Property, plant and equipment, net92,159
 108,137
118,416
 90,201
Intangible assets, net6,277
 7,615
Goodwill and intangible assets, net6,491
 6,691
Other assets5,484
 5,125
9,933
 7,615
Deferred income taxes467
 861
80,786
 751
Total assets$244,136
 $257,916
$368,991
 $240,943
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY      
Current liabilities:      
Accounts payable$27,740
 $27,266
23,919
 27,023
Accrued payroll expenses19,757
 19,130
24,540
 23,005
Short-term borrowings under revolving credit facility9,654
 29,126
109
 78
Short-term obligations under capital leases3,409
 3,737
1,323
 3,249
Short-term derivative liability9,896
 737
Short-term derivative liabilities
 3,977
Deferred income taxes923
 1,445

 1,390
Other current liabilities5,171
 5,296
6,946
 6,152
Total current liabilities76,550
 86,737
56,837
 64,874
Long-term borrowings under revolving credit facility10,000
 
Long-term derivative liability1,129
 
Accrued pension liabilities68,047
 47,871
Accrued postretirement benefits16,076
 22,526
20,808
 23,471
Other long-term liabilities—capital leases8,759
 12,130
Accrued pension liabilities43,800
 48,191
Accrued workers’ compensation liabilities5,132
 4,131
11,459
 10,964
Other long-term liabilities-capital leases1,036
 2,599
Other long-term liabilities28,210
 225
Deferred income taxes852
 649

 928
Total liabilities$162,298
 $174,364
$186,397
 $150,932
Commitments and contingencies (Note 18)
 
Commitments and contingencies (Note 22)
 
Stockholders’ equity:      
Preferred stock, $1.00 par value, 500,000 shares authorized and none issued$
 $

 
Common stock, $1.00 par value, 25,000,000 shares authorized; 16,454,422 and 16,308,859 issued and outstanding at June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively16,454
 16,309
Common stock, $1.00 par value, 25,000,000 shares authorized; 16,781,561 and 16,658,148 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively16,782
 16,658
Additional paid-in capital34,654
 34,834
39,096
 38,143
Retained earnings94,080
 102,542
196,782
 106,864
Unearned ESOP shares(20,836) (25,637)(6,434) (11,234)
Less accumulated other comprehensive loss(42,514) (44,496)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(63,632) (60,420)
Total stockholders’ equity$81,838
 $83,552
$182,594
 $90,011
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity$244,136
 $257,916
$368,991
 $240,943
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

36




FARMER BROS. CO.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
 
 Year ended June 30,
 2013 2012 2011
   As Restated As Restated
Net sales$509,964
 $495,442
 $463,945
Cost of goods sold318,825
 322,540
 306,458
Gross profit191,139
 172,902
 157,487
Selling expenses158,079
 150,641
 170,670
General and administrative expenses37,063
 34,222
 49,379
Impairment losses on goodwill and intangible assets92
 5,585
 7,805
Pension withdrawal expense
 4,568
 
Operating expenses195,234
 195,016
 227,854
Loss from operations(4,095) (22,114) (70,367)
Other (expense) income:     
Dividend income1,103
 1,231
 2,534
Interest income452
 214
 178
Interest expense(1,782) (2,137) (1,965)
Other, net(4,965) (4,117) 4,191
Total other (expense) income(5,192) (4,809) 4,938
Loss before taxes(9,287) (26,923) (65,429)
Income tax benefit(825) (347) (13,396)
Net loss$(8,462) $(26,576) $(52,033)
Net loss per common share—basic and diluted$(0.54) $(1.72) $(3.45)
Weighted average common shares outstanding—basic and diluted15,604,452
 15,492,314
 15,066,663
Cash dividends declared per common share$
 $
 $0.18
 Year Ended June 30,
 2016 2015 2014
Net sales$544,382
 $545,882
 $528,380
Cost of goods sold335,907
 348,846
 332,466
Gross profit208,475
 197,036
 195,914
Selling expenses150,198
 151,753
 155,088
General and administrative expenses41,970
 31,173
 35,724
Restructuring and other transition expenses16,533
 10,432
 
Net gains from sale of Spice Assets(5,603) 
 
Net (gains) losses from sales of assets(2,802) 394
 (3,814)
Operating expenses200,296
 193,752
 186,998
Income from operations8,179
 3,284
 8,916
Other income (expense):     
Dividend income1,115
 1,172
 1,073
Interest income496
 381
 429
Interest expense(425) (769) (1,258)
Other, net556
 (3,014) 3,677
Total other income (expense)1,742
 (2,230) 3,921
Income before taxes9,921
 1,054
 12,837
Income tax (benefit) expense(79,997) 402
 705
Net income$89,918
 $652
 $12,132
Net income per common share—basic$5.45
 $0.04
 $0.76
Net income per common share—diluted$5.41
 $0.04
 $0.76
Weighted average common shares outstanding—basic16,502,523
 16,127,610
 15,909,631
Weighted average common shares outstanding—diluted16,627,402
 16,267,134
 16,014,587

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


37




FARMER BROS. CO.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(In thousands)
 Year Ended June 30, 
 2013 2012 2011 
   As Restated As Restated 
Net loss$(8,462) $(26,576) $(52,033) 
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:      
Deferred losses on derivatives designated as cash flow hedges(7,921) 
 
 
Change in the funded status of retiree benefit obligations10,969
 (26,574) 36,731
 
Income tax expense(1,066) 
 (14,053) 
Total comprehensive loss, net of tax$(6,480) $(53,150) $(29,355) 
 Year Ended June 30,
 2016 2015 2014
Net income$89,918
 $652
 $12,132
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:     
Unrealized gains (losses) on derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges, net of taxes185
 (14,295) 18,685
Losses (Gains) on derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges reclassified to cost of goods sold, net of taxes8,064
 (4,211) (1,161)
Change in the funded status of retiree benefit obligations, net of taxes(11,461) (14,122) (2,802)
Total comprehensive income (loss), net of tax$86,706
 $(31,976) $26,854

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.




38




FARMER BROS. CO.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
 
Year ended June 30,
FARMER BROS. CO.FARMER BROS. CO.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWSCONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)(In thousands)
2013 2012 2011Year Ended June 30,
  As Restated As Restated2016 2015 2014
Cash flows from operating activities:          
Net loss$(8,462) $(26,576) $(52,033)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:     
Net income$89,918
 $652
 $12,132
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:    
Depreciation and amortization32,542
 32,113
 31,758
20,774
 24,179
 27,334
(Recovery of) provision for doubtful accounts(757) (980) 2,024
Provision for (recovery of) doubtful accounts71
 (8) 80
Restructuring and other transition expenses, net of payments(2,697) 6,608
 
Deferred income taxes74
 (78) 338
(80,314) 123
 137
Impairment losses on goodwill and intangible assets92
 5,585
 7,805
Net (gains) losses on sales of assets(4,466) (268) 358
Net (gains) losses from sales of assets(8,405) 394
 (3,814)
ESOP and share-based compensation expense3,563
 3,287
 3,825
4,342
 5,691
 4,692
Net losses (gains) on derivatives and investments11,132
 6,175
 (1,312)
Net losses (gains) on derivative instruments and investments12,910
 (950) (4,276)
Change in operating assets and liabilities:          
Restricted cash(6,472) (1,153) (460)1,002
 (1,002) 8,084
Short-term investments(11,942) (1,497) 28,294
Purchases of trading securities held for investment(7,255) (3,661) (5,915)
Proceeds from sales of trading securities held for investment5,901
 2,358
 4,290
Accounts and notes receivable(2,429) 3,745
 (2,929)(3,476) 2,078
 2,248
Inventories5,115
 13,236
 3,640
3,608
 20,470
 (14,439)
Income tax receivable353
 (314) 5,392
288
 (307) 181
Derivative (liabilities) assets, net(10,583) (7,269) 3,932
Prepaid expenses and other assets(157) (860) 400
(111) (1,332) (661)
Accounts payable1,773
 (13,441) 12,493
(3,343) (16,841) 17,526
Accrued payroll expenses and other liabilities1,741
 1,949
 2,156
Accrued payroll expenses and other current liabilities5,829
 (4,606) 2,574
Accrued postretirement benefits(6,451) 3,530
 (9,557)(358) (1,507) (1,905)
Other long-term liabilities6,678
 (6,320) 1,745
(473) 1,860
 695
Net cash provided by operating activities$21,927
 $18,133
 $33,937
$27,628
 $26,930
 $52,895
Cash flows from investing activities:          
Acquisition of business, net of cash acquired$
 $(1,200) $
Purchases of property, plant and equipment(15,894) (17,498) (19,416)(31,050) (19,216) (25,267)
Purchases of construction-in-progress assets under New Facility lease(19,426) 
 
Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment5,666
 3,037
 2,021
10,946
 273
 4,536
Net cash used in investing activities$(10,228) $(14,461) $(17,395)$(39,530) $(20,143) $(20,731)
Cash flows from financing activities:          
Proceeds from revolving credit facility43,990
 17,250
 35,450
$405
 $63,376
 $44,806
Repayments on revolving credit facility(54,761) (21,200) (43,970)(374) (63,947) (65,454)
Proceeds from New Facility lease financing19,426
 
 
Payments of capital lease obligations(3,359) (1,897) (1,433)(3,147) (3,910) (3,681)
Payment of financing costs(8) (571) 
Proceeds from stock option exercises1,203
 
 
1,694
 1,548
 1,480
Dividends paid
 
 (4,657)
Net cash used in financing activities$(12,927) $(5,847) $(14,610)
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents$(1,228) $(2,175) $1,932
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year3,906
 6,081
 4,149
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year$2,678
 $3,906
 $6,081
Tax withholding payment - net share settlement of equity awards(159) (116) 
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities$17,837
 $(3,620) $(22,849)
(continued on next page)(continued on next page)

(continued on next page)

39



FARMER BROS. CO.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (continued from previous page)
(In thousands)
FARMER BROS. CO.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
 Year Ended June 30,
 2016 2015 2014
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents$5,935
 $3,167
 $9,315
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year15,160
 11,993
 2,678
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year$21,095
 $15,160
 $11,993
Year ended June 30,
2013 2012 2011
  As Restated As Restated
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:          
Cash paid for interest$1,783
 $2,123
 $1,945
$425
 $769
 $1,258
Cash paid for income taxes$370
 $317
 $324
324
 $858
 $361
Non-cash financing and investing activities:     
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing activities:     
Equipment acquired under capital leases$626
 $9,508
 $5,659
$
 $55
 $1,217
Net change in derivative assets and liabilities
included in other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
$8,249
 $(18,506) $17,524
Construction-in-progress assets under New Facility lease$8,684
 $
 $
New Facility lease obligation$8,684
 $
 $
Non-cash additions to equipment$441
 $51
 $142
Asset held for sale$7,179
 $
 $
Non-cash portion of earnout recognized$496
 $
 $

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


40




FARMER BROS. CO.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(In thousands, except share and per share data) 
 
Common
Shares
 
Stock
Amount
 
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
 
Retained
Earnings
 
Unearned
ESOP
Shares
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 Total
Balance at June 30, 2010
(As Previously Reported)
16,164,179
 $16,164
 $37,468
 $186,900
 $(35,238) $(39,699) $165,595
Restatement adjustments (see Note 2)
 
 
 (2,950) 
 (901) (3,851)
Balance at June 30, 2010 (As Restated)16,164,179
 $16,164
 $37,468
 $183,950
 $(35,238) $(40,600) $161,744
Net loss (As Restated)
 
 
 (52,033) 
 
 (52,033)
Change in the funded status of retiree benefit obligations, net of tax of $14,053 (As Restated)
 
 
 
 
 22,678
 22,678
Dividends ($0.18 per share)
 
 
 (2,799) 
 
 (2,799)
ESOP contributions1,040
 1
 8
 
 (9) 
 
ESOP compensation expense, including reclassifications
 
 (2,173) 
 4,810
 
 2,637
Share-based compensation21,153
 21
 1,167
 
 
 
 1,188
Balance at June 30, 2011 (As Restated)16,186,372
 $16,186
 $36,470
 $129,118
 $(30,437) $(17,922) $133,415
Net loss (As Restated)
 
 
 (26,576) 
 
 (26,576)
Change in the funded status of retiree benefit obligations, net of tax of $0 (As Restated)
 
 
 
 
 (26,574) (26,574)
ESOP compensation expense, including reclassifications
 
 (3,327) 
 4,800
 
 1,473
Share-based compensation122,487
 123
 1,691
 
 
 
 1,814
Balance at June 30, 2012 (As Restated)16,308,859
 $16,309
 $34,834
 $102,542
 $(25,637) $(44,496) $83,552
Net loss
 
 
 (8,462) 
 
 (8,462)
Deferred losses on derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, net of reclassifications to earnings
 
 
 
 
 (7,921) (7,921)
Change in the funded status of retiree benefit obligations, net of tax of $1,066
 
 
 
 
 9,903
 9,903
ESOP compensation expense, including reclassifications
 
 (2,738) 
 4,801
 
 2,063
Share-based compensation28,081
 28
 1,472
 
 
 
 1,500
Stock option exercises117,482
 117
 1,086
 
 
 
 1,203
Balance at June 30, 201316,454,422
 $16,454
 $34,654
 $94,080
 $(20,836) $(42,514) $81,838
 
Common
Shares
 
Stock
Amount
 
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
 
Retained
Earnings
 
Unearned
ESOP
Shares
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 Total
Balance at June 30, 201316,454,422
 $16,454
 $34,654
 $94,080
 $(20,836) $(42,514) $81,838
Net income
 
 
 12,132
 
 
 12,132
Unrealized gains on derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges, net of reclassifications to cost of goods sold
 
 
 
 
 17,524
 17,524
Change in the funded status of retiree benefit obligations, net of tax of zero
 
 
 
 
 (2,802) (2,802)
ESOP compensation expense, including reclassifications
 
 (1,475) 
 4,801
 
 3,326
Share-based compensation(4,936) (5) 1,371
 
 
 
 1,366
Stock option exercises112,964
 113
 1,367
 
 
 
 1,480
Balance at June 30, 201416,562,450
 $16,562
 $35,917
 $106,212
 $(16,035) $(27,792) $114,864
Net income
 
 
 652
 
 
 652
Unrealized losses on derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges, net of reclassifications to cost of goods sold
 
 
 
 
 (18,506) (18,506)
Change in the funded status of retiree benefit obligations, net of tax of zero
 
 
 
 
 (14,122) (14,122)
ESOP compensation expense, including reclassifications
 
 (377) 
 4,801
 
 4,424
Share-based compensation4,272
 4
 1,263
 
 
 
 1,267
Stock option exercises95,723
 96
 1,452
 
 
 
 1,548
Shares withheld to cover taxes(4,297) (4) (112) 
 
 
 (116)
Balance at June 30, 201516,658,148
 $16,658
 $38,143
 $106,864
 $(11,234) $(60,420) $90,011
Net income
 
 
 89,918
 
 
 89,918
Unrealized gains on derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges, net of reclassifications to cost of goods sold, net of tax of $5,238
 
 
 
 
 8,249
 8,249
Change in the funded status of retiree benefit obligations, net of tax benefit of $7,277
 
 
 
 
 (11,461) (11,461)
ESOP compensation expense, including reclassifications
 
 (1,413) 
 4,800
 
 3,387
Share-based compensation1,551
 2
 954
 
 
 
 956
Stock option exercises127,039
 127
 1,566
 
 
 
 1,693
Shares withheld to cover taxes(5,177) (5) (154) 
 
 
 (159)
Balance at June 30, 201616,781,561
 $16,782
 $39,096
 $196,782
 $(6,434) $(63,632) $182,594

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

41





FARMER BROS. CO.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
OrganizationOverview
Farmer Bros. Co., a Delaware corporation (including its consolidated subsidiaries unless the context otherwise requires, the “Company,” or “Farmer Bros.”), is a manufacturer,national coffee roaster, wholesaler and distributor of coffee, tea and culinary products. The Company isserves a direct distributorwide variety of coffeecustomers, from small independent restaurants and foodservice operators to restaurants,large institutional buyers like restaurant and convenience store chains, hotels, casinos, offices, quick service restaurants ("QSR's"), convenience stores, healthcare facilitieshospitals, and other foodservice providers,gourmet coffee houses, as well as grocery chains with private brand retailers in the QSR, grocery, drugstore, restaurant, convenience store and independent coffeehouse channels.consumer-branded coffee products. The Company’s product categories consist of roast and ground coffee, frozen liquid coffee; flavored and unflavored iced and hot teas; culinary products; spices; and other beverages including cappuccino, cocoa, granitas, and ready-to-drink iced coffee. The Company was founded in 1912,, was incorporated in California in 1923,, and reincorporated in Delaware in 2004.2004. The Company operates in one business segment.
The Company operates production facilities in Portland, Oregon and Houston, Texas. Distribution takes place out of the Portland facility as well as separate distribution centers in Northlake, Illinois; Oklahoma City, Oklahoma; and Moonachie, New Jersey. As of June 30, 2016, the Company’s Torrance facility continued to house certain administrative functions and serve as a distribution facility and branch warehouse pending transition of the Company’s remaining Torrance operations to its other facilities.
The Company’s product line includes roasted coffee, liquid coffee, coffee-related products suchreach its customers primarily in two ways: through the Company’s nationwide direct-store-delivery, or DSD, network of 450 delivery routes and 109 branch warehouses as coffee filters, sugarof June 30, 2016, or direct-shipped via common carriers or third-party distributors. The Company operates a large fleet of trucks and creamers, assorted icedother vehicles to distribute and hot teas, cappuccino, cocoa, spices, gelatinsdeliver its products, and puddings, soup bases, dressings, gravy and sauce mixes, pancake and biscuit mixes, and jellies and preserves. Mostrelies on third-party logistic (“3PL”) service providers for its long-haul distribution. DSD sales are made “off-truck” by the Company to its customers at their places of business.
The Company serves its customers from six distribution centers and its distribution trucks are replenished from 117 branch warehouses located throughout the contiguous United States. The Company operates its own trucking fleet to support its long-haul distribution requirements. A portion of the Company’s products is distributed by third parties or is direct shipped via common carrier.
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its direct and indirect wholly owned subsidiaries FBC Finance Company, anda California corporation, Coffee Bean Holding Co., Inc., a Delaware corporation, the parent company of Coffee Bean International, Inc., an Oregon corporation (“CBI”), and CBI. All inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated.
Financial Statement PreparationUse of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformityaccordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"(“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities atin the date of theconsolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenueaccompanying notes. The Company reviews its estimates on an ongoing basis using currently available information. Changes in facts and expenses during the reporting period. Actualcircumstances may result in revised estimates and actual results couldmay differ from those estimates.
Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with original maturity dates of 90 days or less to be cash equivalents. Fair values of cash equivalents approximate cost due to the short period of time to maturity.
Investments
The Company’s investments consist of money market instruments, marketable debt, equity and equity securities, various derivative instruments, primarily exchange traded treasury and green coffee futures and options.hybrid securities. Investments are held for trading purposes and stated at fair value. The cost of investments sold is determined on the specific identification method. Dividend and interest income isare accrued as earned. See Note 8.

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)


Fair Value Measurements
The Company groups its assets and liabilities at fair value in three levels, based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value. These levels are:
Level 1—Valuation is based upon quoted prices for identical instruments traded in active markets.
Level 2—Valuation is based upon inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly (i.e. interest rate and yield curves observable at commonly quoted intervals, default rates, etc.). Observable inputs include quoted prices for similar instruments in active and non- active markets. Level 2 includes those financial instruments that are valued with industry standard valuation models that incorporate inputs that are observable in the marketplace throughout the full term of the instrument, or can otherwise be derived from or supported by observable market data in the marketplace. Level 2 inputs may also include insignificant adjustments to market observable inputs.
Level 3—Valuation is based upon one or more unobservable inputs that are significant in establishing a fair value estimate. These unobservable inputs are used to the extent relevant observable inputs are not available and are developed based on the best information available. These inputs may be used with internally developed methodologies that result in management’s best estimate of fair value.
Securities with quotes that are based on actual trades or actionable bids and offers with a sufficient level of activity on or near the measurement date are classified as Level 1. Securities that are priced using quotes derived from implied values, indicative bids and offers, or a limited number of actual trades, or the same information for securities that are similar in many respects to those being valued, are classified as Level 2. If market information is not available for securities being valued, or materially-comparable securities, then those securities are classified as Level 3. In considering market information, management evaluates changes in liquidity, willingness of a broker to execute at the quoted price, the depth and consistency of prices from pricing services, and the existence of observable trades in the market (see Note 9).
Derivative Instruments
The Company purchases various derivative instruments as investments or to create economic hedges of its commodity price risk and interest rate risk. These derivative instruments consist primarily of futuresforward and swaps.option contracts. The Company reports the fair value of derivative instruments on its consolidated balance sheets in "Short-term investments," "Other“Short-term derivative assets," "Short-term” “Other assets,” “Short-term derivative liability,"liabilities,” or "Long-term“Other long-term derivative liability."liabilities.” The Company determines the current and noncurrent classification based on the timing of expected future cash flows of individual trades and reports these amounts on a gross basis. Additionally, the Company reports cash held on deposit in margin accounts for coffee-related derivative instruments on a gross basis.


42

Farmer Bros. Co.basis on its consolidated balance sheet in “Restricted cash” if restricted from withdrawal due to a net loss position in such margin accounts.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

The accounting for the changes in fair value of the Company's derivative instruments can be summarized as follows:
Derivative Treatment Accounting Method
Normal purchases and normal sales exception Accrual accounting
Designated in a qualifying hedging relationship Hedge accounting
All other derivativesderivative instruments Mark-to-market accounting

The Company enters into green coffee purchase commitments at a fixed price or at a price to be fixed (“PTF”). PTF contracts are purchase commitments whereby the quality, quantity, delivery period, price differential to the coffee "C"“C” market price and other negotiated terms are agreed upon, but the date, and therefore the price at which the base “C” market price will be fixed has not yet been established. The coffee "C"“C” market price is fixed at some point after the purchase contract date and before the futures market closes for the delivery month.month and may be fixed either at the direction of the Company to the vendor, or by the application of a derivative that was separately purchased as a hedge. For both fixed-price and PTF contracts, the Company expects to take delivery of and to utilize the coffee in a reasonable period of time and in the conduct of normal business. Accordingly, these purchase commitments qualify as normal purchases and are not recorded at fair value on the Company's consolidated balance sheets.

Prior to April 1, 2013, theThe Company had no derivative instruments that were designated as accounting hedges. Beginning April 1, 2013, the Company implemented procedures followingfollows the guidelines of Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 815, “Derivatives and Hedging” (“ASC 815, "Derivatives and Hedging" ("ASC 815"815”), to enable it to account for certain coffee-related derivativesderivative instruments as accounting hedges in order to minimize the volatility created in the Company's quarterly results from utilizing these derivative contracts and to improve comparability between reporting periods. For a derivative to qualify for designation in a hedging relationship, it must meet specific criteria

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)


and the Company must maintain appropriate documentation. The Company establishes hedging relationships pursuant to its risk management policies. The hedging relationships are evaluated at the inception of the hedging relationship and on an ongoing basis to determine whether the hedging relationship is, and is expected to remain, highly effective in achieving offsetting changes in fair value or cash flows attributable to the underlying risk being hedged. The Company also regularly assesses whether the hedged forecasted transaction is probable of occurring. If a derivative ceases to be or is no longer expected to be highly effective, or if the Company believes the likelihood of occurrence of the hedged forecasted transaction is no longer probable, hedge accounting is discontinued prospectively,for that derivative, and future changes in the fair value of thethat derivative are recognized currently in Other,“Other, net.”

For commodity derivativescoffee-related derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of the change in fair value of the derivative is reported as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (“AOCI”) and subsequently reclassified into cost of goods sold in the period or periods when the hedged transaction affects earnings. Any ineffective portion of the derivative'sderivative instrument's change in fair value is recognized currently in Other,“Other, net. Gains or losses deferred in AOCI associated with terminated derivatives, derivativesderivative instruments, derivative instruments that cease to be highly effective hedges, derivativesderivative instruments for which the forecasted transaction is reasonably possible but no longer probable of occurring, and cash flow hedges that have been otherwise discontinued remain in AOCI until the hedged item affects earnings. If it becomes probable that the forecasted transaction designated as the hedged item in a cash flow hedge will not occur, any gain or loss deferred in AOCI is recognized in “Other, net” at that time. For derivative instruments that are not designated in a hedging relationship, and for which the normal purchases and normal sales exception has not been elected, the changes in fair value are reported in “Other, net.”

The following gains and losses on derivative instruments are netted together and reported in “Other, net” in the Company's consolidated statementstatements of operations:

Realized and unrealized gainsGains and losses on all derivativesderivative instruments that are not designated as cash flow hedges and for which the normal purchases and normal sales exception has not been elected; and
The ineffective portion of unrealized gains and losses on derivativesderivative instruments that are designated as cash flow hedges.
The fair value of derivative instruments is based upon broker quotes. At June 30, 2013,2016 and 2015 approximately 89%96% and 94%, respectively, of the Company's outstanding coffee-related derivative instruments were designated as cash flow hedges (see Note 3)7). At June 30, 2012, no derivative instruments were designated as accounting hedges.

43

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

Concentration of Credit Risk
At June 30, 2013,2016, the financial instruments which potentially expose the Company to concentration of credit risk consist of cash in financial institutions (which exceeds(in excess of federally insured limits), short-term investments, investments in the preferred stocks of other companies, derivativesderivative instruments and trade receivables. Cash equivalents and short-term investments are not concentrated by issuer, industry or geographic area. Maturities are generally shorter than 180 days.days. Investments in the preferred stocks of other companies are limited to high quality issuers and are not concentrated by geographic area or issuer.
The Company does not have any credit-risk related contingent features that would require it in certain circumstances, to post additional collateral in support of its net derivative liability positions. TheAt June 30, 2016, because the Company had $8.1a net gain position in its coffee-related derivative margin accounts, none of the cash in these accounts was restricted. At June 30, 2015, the Company had $1.0 million and $1.6 million, respectively, in restricted cash representing cash held on deposit in margin accounts for coffee-related derivative instruments at June 30, 2013 and 2012 (see Note 6).due to a net loss position in such accounts. Changes in commodity prices and the number of coffee-related derivative instruments held could have a significant impact on cash deposit requirements under the Company's broker and counterparty agreements.
Concentration of credit risk with respect to trade receivables for the Company is limited due to the large number of customers comprising the Company’s customer base and their dispersion across many different geographic areas. The trade receivables are generally short-term and all probable bad debt losses have been appropriately considered in establishing the allowance for doubtful accounts. In fiscal 2010, based on a larger customer base due to the recent Company acquisitions2016 and in response to slower collection of the Company’s accounts receivable resulting from the impact of the economic downturn on the Company’s customers,2014, the Company increased itsthe allowance for doubtful accounts from the previousby $71,000 and $80,000, respectively. In fiscal year by $2.1 million and recorded a $3.2 million charge to bad debt expense. Due to improved collections of outstanding receivables, in fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011,2015, the Company decreased the allowance for doubtful accounts by $0.8 million, $1.0 million and $0.4 million, respectively.$8,000.

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)


Inventories
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market. The Company accounts for coffee, tea and culinary products on a last in, first out (“LIFO”) basis, and coffee brewing equipment manufacturedparts on a first in, first out (“FIFO”) basis. The Company regularly evaluates these inventories to determine whether market conditionsinventory reserves for obsolete and slow-moving inventory. Inventory reserves are correctly reflected in the recorded carrying value. based on inventory obsolescence trends, historical experience and application of specific identification.
At the end of each quarter, the Company records the expected effect of the liquidation of LIFO inventory quantities, if any, and records the actual impact at fiscal year-end. An actual valuation of inventory under the LIFO method is made only at the end of each fiscal year based on the inventory levels and costs at that time.
If inventory quantities decline at the end of the fiscal year compared to the beginning of the fiscal year, the reduction results in the liquidation of LIFO inventory quantities carried at the cost prevailing in prior years. This LIFO inventory liquidation may result in a decrease or increase in cost of goods sold depending on whether the cost prevailing in prior years was lower or higher, respectively, than the current year cost. See Note 11.
Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment is carried at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method. The following useful lives are used:
 
Buildings and facilities10 to 30 years
Machinery and equipment3 to 5 years
Equipment under capital leasesTerm of lease
Office furniture and equipment5 years
Capitalized software3 years
Leasehold improvements are depreciated on a straight-line basis over the lesser of the estimated useful life of the asset or the remaining lease term. When assets are sold or retired, the asset and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the respective account balances and any gain or loss on disposal is included in operations. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense, and betterments are capitalized. See Note 12.
Assets to be disposed of by sale are recorded as held for sale at the lower of carrying value or estimated net realizable value. The Company considers properties to be assets held for sale when (1) management commits to a plan to sell the property; (2) it is unlikely that the disposal plan will be significantly modified or discontinued; (3) the property is available for immediate sale in its present condition; (4) actions required to complete the sale of the property have been initiated; (5) sale of the property is probable and the Company expects the completed sale will occur within one year; and (6) the property is actively being marketed for sale at a price that is reasonable given the Company's estimate of current market value. Upon designation of a property as an asset held for sale, the Company records the property’s value at the lower of its carrying value or its estimated fair value less estimated costs to sell and ceases depreciation. See Note 6.
The Company may incur certain other non-cash asset impairment costs in connection with the Corporate Relocation Plan.
Coffee Brewing Equipment and Service
The Company classifies certain expenses related to coffee brewing equipment provided to customers as cost of goods sold. These costs include the cost of the equipment as well as the cost of servicing that equipment (including service employees’ salaries, cost of transportation and the cost of supplies and parts) and are considered directly attributable to the generation of

44

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

revenues from its customers. The Company capitalizes coffee brewing equipment and depreciates it over an estimated three or five year period, depending on the assessment of the useful life and reports the depreciation expense in cost of goods sold. Accordingly, such costs included in cost of goods sold in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for the years ended June 30, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 20112014 are $25.6$27.0 million,, $24.9 $26.6 million and $27.1$25.9 million,, respectively.
The Company has capitalized coffee brewing equipment in the amounts of $9.3 million and $13.9 million in fiscal 2013 and 2012, respectively. During fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011, the Company had In addition, depreciation expense related to the capitalized coffee brewing equipment reported asin cost of goods sold in the fiscal years ended June 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014 was $9.8 million, $10.4 million and $10.9 million, respectively. The Company capitalized coffee brewing equipment (included in machinery and equipment) in the amounts of $12.8$8.4 million, $12.2 million and $$10.7 million in fiscal 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)


Leases
Leases are categorized as either operating or capital leases at inception. Operating lease costs are recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. An asset and a corresponding liability for the capital lease obligation are established for the cost of capital leases. The capital lease obligation is amortized over the life of the lease. For leases such as the New Facility lease, the Company establishes an asset and liability for the estimated construction costs incurred to the extent that it is involved in the construction of structural improvements or takes construction risk prior to the commencement of the lease. A portion of the lease arrangement is allocated to the land for which the Company accrues rent expense during the construction period. The amount of rent expense to be accrued is determined using the fair value of the leased land at construction commencement and the Company’s incremental borrowing rate, and recognized on a straight-line basis. See Note 49.6 million, respectively..
Income Taxes
Deferred income taxes are determined based on the temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which differences are expected to reverse. Estimating the Company’s tax liabilities involves judgments related to uncertainties in the application of complex tax regulations. The Company makes certain estimates and judgments to determine tax expense for financial statement purposes as they evaluateit evaluates the effect of tax credits, tax benefits and deductions, some of which result from differences in the timing of recognition of revenue or expense for tax and financial statement purposes. Changes to these estimates may result in significant changes to the Company’s tax provision in future periods. Each fiscal quarter the Company reevaluatesre-evaluates its tax provision and reconsiders its estimates and assumptions related to specific tax assets and liabilities, making adjustments as circumstances change.
See Note 20.
Deferred Tax Asset Valuation Allowance
The Company evaluates its deferred tax assets quarterly to determine if a valuation allowance is required and considers whether a valuation allowance should be recorded against deferred tax assets based on the likelihood that the benefits of the deferred tax assets will or will not ultimately be realized in future periods. In making this assessment, significant weight is given to evidence that can be objectively verified, such as recent operating results, and less consideration is given to less objective indicators, such as future income projections. After consideration of positive and negative evidence, including the recent history of income, if the Company determines that it is more likely than not that it will generate future income sufficient to realize its deferred tax assets, the Company will record a reduction in the valuation allowance. See Note 20.
Revenue Recognition
MostThe Company recognizes sales revenue when all of the following have occurred: (1) delivery; (2) persuasive evidence of an agreement exists; (3) pricing is fixed or determinable; and (4) collection is reasonably assured. When product sales are made “off-truck” to the Company’s customers at their places of business by the Company’s sales representatives. Revenue is recognized at the time the Company’s sales representatives physically deliveror products to customers and title passes or when it is accepted by the customer whenare shipped by third-party delivery "FOB Destination," title passes and revenue is recognized upon delivery. When customers pick up products at the Company's distribution centers, title passes and revenue is recognized upon product pick up.
The Company sells roast and ground coffee and tea to The J.M. Smucker Company ("J.M. Smucker") pursuant to a co–packing agreement. The Company recognizes revenue from the co-packing arrangement for the sale of tea on a net basis, net of direct costs of revenue, since the Company acts as an agent of J.M. Smucker in such transactions. As of June 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company had $0.3 million and $0.8 million, respectively, of receivables relating to this arrangement which are included in "Other receivables" (see Note 7).
Earnings (Loss)Net Income Per Common Share
Basic earnings (loss)Net income per share (“EPS”) represents net earningsincome attributable to common stockholders divided by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period, excluding unallocated shares held by the Company's Employee Stock Ownership Plan ("ESOP"(“ESOP”) (see Note 13)16). Diluted EPS represents net earningsincome attributable to common stockholders divided by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding, inclusive of the dilutive impact of common equivalent shares outstanding during the period. However, nonvested restricted stock awards (referred to as participating securities) are excluded from the dilutive impact of common equivalent shares outstanding in accordance with authoritative guidance under the two-class method. The nonvested restricted stockholders are entitled to participate in dividends declared on common stock as if the shares were fully vested and hence are deemed to be participating securities. Under the two-class method, earnings (loss)net income attributable to nonvested restricted stockholders areis excluded from net earnings (loss)income attributable to common stockholders for purposes of calculating basic and diluted EPS. Computation of EPS for the years ended June 30, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011 does not include2014 includes the dilutive effect of 557,427, 667,235124,879, 139,524 and 497,810104,956 shares, respectively, issuable under stock options sincewith exercise prices below the closing price of the Company's common stock on the last trading day of the applicable period, but excludes the dilutive effect of 30,931, 10,455 and 22,441 shares, respectively, issuable under stock options with exercise prices above the closing price of the Company's common stock on the last trading day of the applicable period because their inclusion would be anti-dilutive. Accordingly, the consolidated financial statements present only basic net loss per common share for all periods presented (see See Note 17)21.
Dividends Declared

Although historically the Company has paid a dividendFarmer Bros. Co.
Notes to stockholders, in light of the Company’s current financial position, theConsolidated Financial Statements (continued)


Dividends
The Company’s Board of Directors has omitted the payment of a quarterly dividend since the third quarter of fiscal 2011. The amount, if any, of dividends to be paid in the future will depend upon the Company’s then available cash, anticipated cash needs, overall financial condition, loancredit agreement restrictions, future prospects for earnings and cash flows, as well as other relevant factors.
Employee Stock Ownership Plan
Compensation cost for the ESOP is based on the fair market value of shares released or deemed to be released forto employees in the period.period in which they are committed. Dividends on allocated shares retain the character of true dividends, but dividends on unallocated shares are considered

45

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

compensation cost. As a leveraged ESOP with the Company as lender, a contra equity account is established to offset the Company’s note receivable. The contra account will change as compensation expense is recognized.recognized (see Note 16). The cost of shares purchased by the ESOP which have not been committed to be released or allocated to participants are shown as a contra-equity account “Unearned ESOP Shares” and are excluded from earnings per share calculations.
Share-based Compensation
On December 5, 2013, the Company’s stockholders approved the Farmer Bros. Co. Amended and Restated 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Amended Equity Plan”). The principal change to the Amended Equity Plan was to limit awards under the plan to performance-based stock options and to restricted stock under limited circumstances.
The Company measures all share-based compensation cost at the grant date, based on the fair values of the awards that are ultimately expected to vest, and recognizes that cost as an expense on a straight line-basis in its consolidated statements of operations over the requisite service period. Fair value of restricted stock is the closing price of the Company's common stock on the date of grant. The Company estimates the fair value of option awards using the Black-Scholes option valuation model, which requires management to make certain assumptions for estimating the fair value of stock options at the date of grant. The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. Because the Company’s stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options, and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimates, in management’s opinion, the existing models may not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of the Company’s stock options. Although the fair value of stock options is determined using an option valuation model, that value may not be indicative of the fair value observed in a willing buyer/willing seller market transaction. See Note 17.
Impairment of Goodwill and Indefinite-lived Intangible Assets
The Company performsaccounts for its annual impairment test of goodwill and/or otherand indefinite-lived intangible assets as of June 30.in accordance with ASC 350, “Intangibles-Goodwill and Other” (“ASC 350”). Goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets are not amortized but instead are reviewed for impairment annually, and onor more frequently if an interim basis if eventsevent occurs or changes in circumstances between annual testschange which indicate that an asset might be impaired. Indefinite-livedPursuant to ASC 350, the Company performs a qualitative assessment of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets on its consolidated balance sheets, to determine if there is a more likely than not indication that its goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are tested forimpaired as of June 30. If the indicators of impairment by comparing their fair valuesare present, the Company performs a quantitative assessment to their carrying values.determine the impairment of these assets as of the measurement date.
Testing for impairment of goodwill is a two-step process. The first step requires the Company to compare the fair value of its reporting unitsunit to the carrying value of the net assets of the respective reporting units,unit, including goodwill. If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value, goodwill of the reporting unit is potentially impaired and the Company then completes step two to measure the impairment loss, if any. The second step requires the calculation of the implied fair value of goodwill, which is the residual fair value remaining after deducting the fair value of all tangible and intangible net assets of the reporting unit from the fair value of the reporting unit. If the implied fair value of goodwill is less than the carrying amount of goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized equal to the difference.
In its annual test ofIndefinite-lived intangible assets are tested for impairment inby comparing their fair values to their carrying values. An impairment charge is recorded if the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, the Company identified indicators of impairment including a decline in market capitalization and continuing losses from operations. The Company performed impairment tests to determine the recoverability of the carrying values of the assets or if impairment should be measured. The Company was required to make estimates of theestimated fair value of the Company's intangible assets, and all assets of CBI, the reporting unit, which were based on the use of the income approach and/or market approach.
The Company used the relief from royalty method under the income approach to estimate the fair value of its indefinite-lived intangible assets. Inputs to this method included estimated royalty rates associated with licensing and franchise royalty agreements in related industries, which are Level 3 inputs within the fair value hierarchy. To estimate the fair value of CBI, the Company used discounted cash flow analysis under the income approach and the guideline public company method under the market approach. Inputs to the discounted cash flow analysis included the projection of future cash flows which are Level 3 inputs within the fair value hierarchy. Inputs to the guideline public company analysis included valuation multiples of publicly traded companies similar to CBI, which are Level 2 inputs within the fair value hierarchy.
As a result of these impairment tests, the Company determined that the Company's trademarks acquired in connection with the CBI acquisition were impaired and that the carrying value of all of the assets of CBI excluding goodwill exceeded their estimated fair values resulting in an implied fair value of zero for CBI's goodwill. Accordingly, in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, the Company recorded total impairment charges of $5.6 million including $5.1 million in impairment losses on goodwill. As of June 30, 2012, goodwill was written down to zero.
In its annual test of impairment in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013, the Company determined that the book value of a certain trademark acquired in connection with the DSD Coffee Business acquisition was higher than the present value of the estimated future cash flows and concluded that the trademark was impaired. As a result, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $0.1 million to earnings in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013.
Long-Lived Assets, Excluding Goodwill and Indefinite-lived Intangible Assets
The Company reviews the recoverability of its long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable.has decreased below their carrying values. Long-lived assets evaluated for impairment are grouped with other assets to the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent of the cash flows of other groups of assets and liabilities. The estimated future cash flows are based upon, among other things, assumptions about expected future operating performance and may differ from actual cash flows. If the sum of the

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)


projected undiscounted cash flows (excluding interest) is less than the carrying value of the assets, the assets will be written down to the estimated fair value in the period in which the determination is made.
There were no intangible asset or goodwill impairment charges recorded in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016 or 2015.
Other Intangible Assets
Other intangible assets consist of finite-lived intangible assets including acquired non-compete agreements and customer relationships. These are amortized over their estimated useful lives and are tested for impairment by grouping them with other assets at the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent of the cash flows of other groups of assets and liabilities. The estimated future cash flows are based upon, among other things, assumptions about expected future operating performance, and may differ from actual cash flows. If the sum of the projected undiscounted cash flows (excluding interest) is less than the carrying value of the assets, the assets will be written down to the estimated fair value in the period in which the determination is made. InThe Company reviews the recoverability of its annual testlong-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. There were no other intangible asset impairment as ofcharges recorded in the end of fiscal 2011, the Company determined that definite-lived intangible assets consisting of the customer relationships acquired,year ended June 30, 2016 and the distribution agreement and co-pack agreement entered into, in connection with the DSD Coffee Business acquisition were impaired. As a result, in fiscal 2011, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $7.8 million in operating expenses.2015.

46

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

Shipping and Handling Costs
The Company distributes its products directly to its customers and shippingShipping and handling costs incurred through outside carriers are recorded as Companya component of the Company's selling expenses.expenses and were $13.3 million, $8.3 million and $8.4 million, respectively, in the fiscal years ended June 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014. Shipping and handling costs in fiscal 2016 include costs related to the Company's move to 3PL for its long-haul operations.
Collective Bargaining Agreements
Certain Company employees are subject to collective bargaining agreements. The duration of these agreements extend to 2017. Approximately 35%2020. At June 30, 2016, approximately 31% of the Company's workforce iswas covered by such agreements.
Self-Insurance
The Company uses a combination of insurance and self-insurance mechanisms, including the use of captive insurance entities and participation in a reinsurance treaty, to provide for the potential liability of certain risks including workers’ compensation, health care benefits, general liability, product liability, property insurance and director and officers’ liability insurance. Liabilities associated with risks retained by the Company are not discounted and are estimated by considering historical claims experience, demographics, exposure and severity factors and other actuarial assumptions.
The Company's self-insurance for workers’ compensation liability includes estimated outstanding losses of unpaid claims. and allocated loss adjustment expenses (“ALAE”), case reserves, the development of known claims and incurred but not reported claims. ALAE are the direct expenses for settling specific claims. The amounts reflect per occurrence and annual aggregate limits maintained by the Company. The estimated liability analysis does not include estimating a provision for unallocated loss adjustment expenses.
The estimated gross undiscounted workers’ compensation liability relating to such claims was $14.7 million and $13.4 million respectively, and the estimated recovery from reinsurance was $2.4 million and $2.5 million, respectively, as of June 30, 2016 and 2015. The short-term and long-term accrued liabilities for workers’ compensation claims are presented on the Company's consolidated balance sheets in “Other current liabilities” and in “Accrued workers' compensation liabilities,” respectively. The estimated insurance receivable is included in “Other assets” on the Company's consolidated balance sheets.
At June 30, 2016 and 2015, the Company posted a $7.4 million and $7.0 million letter of credit, respectively, as a security deposit with the State of California Department of Industrial Relations Self-Insurance Plans for participation in the alternative security program for California self-insurers for workers’ compensation liability. At June 30, 2016 and 2015, the Company had posted a $4.3 million letter of credit as a security deposit for self-insuring workers’ compensation, general liability and auto insurance coverages outside of California.
The estimated liability related to the Company's self-insured group medical insurance at June 30, 2016 and 2015 was $1.3 million and $1.0 million, respectively, recorded on an incurred but not reported basis, within deductible limits, based on actual claims and the average lag time between the date insurance claims are filed and the date those claims are paid.

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)


General liability, product liability and commercial auto liability are insured through a captive insurance program. The Company's liability reserve for such claims was $0.9 million and $0.8 million at June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
The estimated liability related to the Company's self-insured group medical insurance, general liability, product liability and commercial auto liability is included on the Company's consolidated balance sheets in “Other current liabilities.”
Pension Plans
The Company’s pension plans are not admitting new participants, therefore, changes to pension liabilities are primarily due to market fluctuations of investments for existing participants and changes in interest rates. All plans are accounted for using the guidance of ASC 710, "Compensation - General" and ASC 715 "Compensation-Retirement Benefits" and are measured as of the end of the fiscal year.
The Company recognizes the overfunded or underfunded status of a defined benefit pension or postretirement plan as an asset or liability in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Changes in the funded status are recognized through AOCI, in the year in which the changes occur. See Note 14.
Business Combinations
The Company accounts for business combinations under the acquisition method of accounting. The purchase price of each business acquired is allocated to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and the liabilities assumed based on information regarding their respective fair values on the date of acquisition. Any excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the separately identifiable assets acquired and the liabilities assumed is allocated to goodwill. Management determines the fair values used in purchase price allocations for intangible assets based on historical data, estimated discounted future cash flows, and expected royalty rates for trademarks and trade names, as well as certain other information. The valuation of assets acquired and liabilities assumed requires a number of judgments and is subject to revision as additional information about the fair value of assets and liabilities becomes available. Additional information, which existed as of the acquisition date but unknown to the Company at that time, may become known during the remainder of the measurement period, a period not to exceed twelve months from the acquisition date. Adjustments in the purchase price allocation may require a recasting of the amounts allocated to goodwill and intangible assets. Acquisition costs are expensed as incurred. The results of operations of businesses acquired are included in the consolidated financial statements from their dates of acquisition. See Note 2.
Sale of Spice Assets
On December 8, 2015, the Company completed the sale of certain assets associated with the Company’s manufacture, processing and distribution of raw, processed and blended spices and certain other culinary products (collectively, the “Spice Assets”) to Harris Spice Company, Inc. (“Harris”). The Company has followed the guidance in ASC 205-20, "Presentation of Financial Statements-Discontinued Operations," as updated by Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2014-08, "Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360): Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity" and has not presented the sale of the Spice Assets as discontinued operations. Gain from the earnout on the sale is recognized when earned and when realization is assured beyond a reasonable doubt. See Note 5.
Recently Adopted Accounting Standards
In September 2011,March 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB"(the "FASB") issued ASU No. 2016-05, "Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Effect of Derivative Contract Novations on Existing Hedge Accounting Standards UpdateRelationships (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force" ("ASU") No. 2011-08, “Goodwill and Other (Topic 350), Testing Goodwill for Impairment” (“ASU 2011-08”2016-05"). PursuantASU 2016-05 clarifies that "a change in the counterparty to ASU 2011-08 companies havea derivative instrument that has been designated as the optionhedging instrument in an existing hedging relationship would not, in and of itself, be considered a termination of the derivative instrument" or "a change in a critical term of the hedging relationship." As long as all other hedge accounting criteria in ASC 815 are met, a hedging relationship in which the hedging derivative instrument is novated would not be discontinued or require redesignation. This clarification applies to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not (a likelihood of more than 50%) that theboth cash flow and fair value of a reporting unithedging relationships. For public business entities, ASU 2016-05 is less than its carrying amount. If, after considering the totality of events and circumstances, an entity determines it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, performing the two-step impairment test is unnecessary. The amendments include examples of events and circumstances that an entity should consider. ASU 2011-08 was effective for financial statements issued for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal yearsperiods within those annual periods. Early application is permitted including adoption in an interim period. The Company early adopted ASU 2016-05 beginning after June 15, 2012 and was effective for the Company for fiscal 2013 beginning Julyin April 1, 2012.2016. Adoption of ASU 2011-082016-05 did not have a material effect on the results of operations, financial position or cash flows of the Company.
On July 1, 2012,

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)


In November 2015, the Company adoptedFASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, "Comprehensive Income2015-17, "Income Taxes (Topic 220)740): PresentationBalance Sheet Classification of Comprehensive Income"Deferred Taxes" ("ASU 2011-05"2015-17"), except for the provisions of ASU 2011-05 which were deferred by ASU No. 2011-12, "Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income" ("ASU 2011-12"). The new guidance eliminates the current option to report other comprehensive income and its components in the statement of changes in equity. Instead, the Company presents other comprehensive income in a separate statement following the consolidated statements of operations. The new guidance also requires entities to present reclassification adjustments outdeferred tax assets ("DTAs") and deferred tax liabilities ("DTLs") as noncurrent in a classified balance sheet. ASU 2015-17 simplifies the current guidance, which requires entities to separately present DTAs and DTLs as current and noncurrent in a classified balance sheet. For public business entities, the amendments in ASU 2015-17 are effective for financial statements issued for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. Early application is permitted as of accumulated other comprehensive income by componentthe beginning of an interim or annual reporting period. The Company early adopted ASU 2015-17 beginning in both the consolidated statementApril 1, 2016. Adoption of operations and the consolidated statement of comprehensive income. ASU 2011-12 indefinitely deferred the guidance related to the presentation of reclassification adjustments. ASU 2011-05 only relates to disclosure requirements and its adoption2015-17 did not have a material effect on the results of operations, financial position or cash flows of the Company.
In May 2011,August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04, “Fair Value2015-15, “Interest-Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Presentation and Subsequent Measurement (Topic 820), Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs”of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements” (“ASU 2011-04”2015-15”). ASU 2011-04 amends2015-15 incorporates into the fair value measurementASC an SEC staff announcement that the SEC staff will not object to an entity presenting the cost of securing a revolving line of credit as an asset, regardless of whether a balance is outstanding. The standard, as issued, did not address revolving lines of credit, which may not have outstanding balances. An entity that repeatedly draws on a revolving credit facility and disclosure guidance in ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurementsthen repays the balance could present the cost as a deferred asset and Disclosures” (“ASC 820”),reclassify all or a portion of it as a direct deduction from the liability whenever a balance is outstanding. However, the SEC staff’s announcement provides a less-cumbersome alternative. Either way, the cost should be amortized over the term of the FASB for financial assets and liabilities to converge GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards requirements for measuring amounts at fair value as well as disclosures about these measurements. Many of the amendments clarify existing concepts and are generally not expected to result in significant changes to how many companies currently apply the fair value principles. In certain instances, however, the FASB changed a principle to achieve convergence, and while limited, these amendments have the potential to significantly change practice for some companies. For public entities, the amendments are effective during interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011.arrangement. The Company adopted the amendmentsASU 2015-15 beginning July 1, 2012. The adoption2015. Adoption of ASU 2011-042015-15 did not have a material effect on the results of operations, financial position or cash flows of the Company.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In February 2013,May 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-02, “Reporting Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income”2016-12, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606); Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing" ("ASU 2013-02"2016-12"), an update to the authoritativewhich clarifies guidance related to identifying performance obligations and licensing implementation guidance contained in the reporting of amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income. This new requirement about presenting information about amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income and their corresponding effect on net income will present, in one place, information about significant amounts reclassified and, in some cases, cross-references to related footnote disclosures.revenue recognition standard. The disclosure amendments in this updateASU 2016-12 affect the guidance in ASU 2014-09, "Revenue From Contracts With Customers (Topic 606) ("ASU 2014-09") which is not yet effective. The effective date and transition requirements for the amendments in ASU 2016-12 are the same as the effective date and transition requirements in ASC 606 (and any other Topic amended by ASU 2014-09). ASU 2015-14, "Revenue From Contracts With Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date," ("ASU 2015-14"). defers the effective date of ASU 2014-09 by one year and, therefore, the deferral results in ASU 2014-09 and its amendment ASU 2016-12 being effective January 1, 2018.
In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-10 "Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606); Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing" ("ASU 2016-10"), which clarifies guidance related to identifying performance obligations and licensing implementation guidance contained in the new revenue recognition standard. ASU 2016-10 seeks to pro-actively address areas in which diversity in practice potentially could arise, as well as to reduce the cost and complexity of applying certain aspects of the guidance both at implementation and on an ongoing basis. The effective date and transition requirements for the amendments in ASU 2016-10 are the same as the effective date and transition requirements in ASU 2014-09, which is effective January 1, 2018.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, "Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting" ("ASU 2016-09"). ASU 2016-09 is being issued as part of the FASB's Simplification Initiative. The areas for simplification in ASU 2016-09 involve several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. Some of the areas for simplification apply only to nonpublic entities. For public business entities, the amendments in ASU 2016-09 are effective prospectively for fiscal years (andannual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those years)annual periods. Early adoption is permitted for any entity in any interim or annual period. If an entity early adopts the amendments in an interim period, any adjustments should be reflected as of the beginning after December 15, 2012 andof the fiscal year that includes that interim period. An entity that elects early adoption is permitted.must adopt all of the amendments in the same period. ASU 2013-022016-09 is effective for the Company beginning July 1, 2013.2017. Adoption of ASU 2013-02 is not expected to have a material effect on the results of operations, financial position or cash flows of the Company.

47

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-01, “Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities” ("ASU 2013-01"). The amendments limit the scope of ASU No. 2011-11, “Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities” ("ASU 2011-11") to certain derivative instruments (including bifurcated embedded derivatives), repurchase agreements and reverse repurchase agreements, and securities borrowing and lending arrangements that are either (1) offset on the balance sheet or (2) subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement or similar agreement. The requirements as initially written in ASU 2011-11 would have applied more broadly than intended. The disclosure amendments in this update are effective prospectively for fiscal years (and interim periods within those years) beginning after January 1, 2013. The amendments will be applied retrospectively for all comparative periods presented on the balance sheet. ASU 2013-01 is effective for the Company beginning in July 1, 2013. Adoption of ASU 2013-012016-09 is not expected to have a material effect on the results of operations, financial position or cash flows of the Company.

In July 2012,February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2012-02, “Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment”2016-02, "Leases (Topic 842)" ("ASU 2012-02"2016-02"), an update towhich introduces a new lessee model that brings substantially all leases onto the authoritativebalance sheet. In addition, while the new guidance related to the impairment testing of indefinite-lived intangible assets. Similar to the guidance for goodwill impairment testing, companies will have the option to first perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair valueretains most of the indefinite-lived intangible asset is less than its carrying value. The guidance provides companies with a revised list of examples of events and circumstances to consider, in their totality, to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair valueprinciples of the assetexisting lessor model in GAAP, it aligns many of those principles with ASC 606, "Revenue From Contracts With Customers." For public business entities, ASU 2016-02 is less than its carrying amount. If a company concludes that this is the case, the company is required to perform the quantitative impairment test by comparing the fair value with the carrying value. Otherwise, a company can skip the quantitative test. Companies are not required to perform the qualitative assessment and are permitted to skip the qualitative assessment for any indefinite-lived asset in any period and proceed directly to the quantitative impairment test. The company may resume performing the qualitative assessment in any subsequent period. The amendments are effective for financial statements issued for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012.periods within those annual periods. Early adoptionapplication is permitted. ASU 2012-02

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)


2016-02 is effective for the Company beginning July 1, 2013.2019. Adoption of ASU 2012-022016-02 is not expected to have a material effect on the results of operations, financial position or cash flows of the Company.
In September 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-16, “Business Combinations (Topic 805): Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments” (“ASU 2015-16”). ASU 2015-16 eliminates the requirement that an acquirer in a business combination account for measurement-period adjustments retrospectively. Instead, an acquirer will recognize a measurement-period adjustment during the period in which it determines the amount of the adjustment, including the effect on earnings of any amounts it would have recorded in previous periods if the accounting had been completed at the acquisition date. The guidance is effective for public business entities for fiscal years, including interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015, with early adoption permitted. ASU 2015-16 is effective for the Company beginning July 1, 2016. Adoption of ASU 2015-16 is not expected to have a material effect on the results of operations, financial position or cash flows of the Company.
In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-12, “Plan Accounting: Defined Benefit Pension Plans (Topic 960), Defined Contribution Pension Plans (Topic 962), Health and Welfare Benefit Plans (Topic 965), (Part I) Fully Benefit-Responsive Investment Contracts, (Part II) Plan Investment Disclosures, (Part III) Measurement Date Practical Expedient” ("ASU 2015-12”). ASU 2015-12 eliminates requirements that employee benefit plans measure the fair value of fully benefit-responsive investment contracts ("FBRICs") and provide the related fair value disclosures. As a result, FBRICs are measured, presented and disclosed only at contract value. Also, plans will be required to disaggregate their investments measured using fair value by general type, either on the face of the financial statements or in the notes, and self-directed brokerage accounts are one general type. Plans no longer have to disclose the net appreciation/depreciation in fair value of investments by general type or individual investments equal to or greater than 5% of net assets available for benefits. In addition, a plan with a fiscal year end that does not coincide with the end of a calendar month is allowed to measure its investments and investment-related accounts using the month end closest to its fiscal year end. The new guidance for FBRICs and plan investment disclosures should be applied retrospectively. The measurement date practical expedient should be applied prospectively. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, with early adoption permitted. ASU 2015-12 is effective for the Company beginning July 1, 2016. Adoption of ASU 2015-12 is not expected to have a material effect on the results of operations, financial position or cash flows of the Company.
In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-11, “Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory” (“ASU 2015-11”). ASU 2015-11 simplifies the subsequent measurement of inventory by requiring inventory to be measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Entities will continue to apply their existing impairment models to inventories that are accounted for using last-in first-out or LIFO and the retail inventory method or RIM. Under current guidance, net realizable value is one of several calculations an entity needs to make to measure inventory at the lower of cost or market. ASU 2015-11 is effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted, and the guidance must be applied prospectively after the date of adoption. ASU 2015-11 is effective for the Company beginning July 1, 2017. Adoption of ASU 2015-11 is not expected to have a material effect on the results of operations, financial position or cash flows of the Company.
In May 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-07, “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosures for Investments in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or Its Equivalent)” (“ASU 2015-07”). ASU 2015-07 removes the requirement to categorize investments for which the fair values are measured using the net asset value per share practical expedient within the fair value hierarchy. It also limits certain disclosures to investments for which the entity has elected to measure the fair value using the practical expedient. ASU 2015-07 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2015, with early adoption permitted. ASU 2015-07 is effective for the Company beginning July 1, 2016. The Company is in the process of assessing the impact of the adoption of ASU 2015-07 on its consolidated financial statements.
In May 2014, the FASB issued accounting guidance which requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers under ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” (“ASU 2014-09”). ASU 2014-09 will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in GAAP when it becomes effective. On July 9, 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, "Revenue From Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date," which defers the effective date of ASU 2014-09 by one year allowing early adoption as of the original effective date of January 1, 2017. The deferral results in the new accounting standard being effective January 1, 2018. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2014-09 on its results of operations, financial position and cash flows.

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)



Note 2. RestatementAcquisition
On January 12, 2015, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets of Rae’ Launo Corporation (“RLC”) relating to its DSD and in-room distribution business in the Southeastern United States (the “RLC Acquisition”). The purchase price was $1.5 million, consisting of $1.2 million in cash paid at closing and earnout payments of up to $0.1 million that the Company expects to pay each year over a three-year period based on achievement of certain milestones.
The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired at the date of acquisition, based on the final purchase price allocation:
Fair Values of Assets Acquired Estimated Useful Life (years)
(In thousands)   
Property, plant and equipment$338
  
Intangible assets:   
  Non-compete agreement20
 3.0
  Customer relationships870
 4.5
  Goodwill272
  
      Total assets acquired$1,500
  
Definite-lived intangible assets consist of a non-compete agreement and customer relationships. Total net carrying value of definite-lived intangible assets as of June 30, 2016 and 2015 was $0.6 million and $0.8 million, respectively, and accumulated amortization as of June 30, 2016 and 2015 was $0.3 million and $0.1 million, respectively. Estimated aggregate amortization of definite-lived intangible assets, calculated on a straight-line basis and based on estimated fair values is $0.2 million in each of the next three fiscal years commencing with fiscal 2017.

Note 3. Corporate Relocation Plan
On February 5, 2015, the Company announced a plan (the “Corporate Relocation Plan”) to close its Torrance, California facility and relocate its corporate headquarters, product development lab, and manufacturing and distribution operations from Torrance, California to a new facility housing these operations currently under construction in Northlake, Texas (the “New Facility”). Approximately 350 positions were impacted as a result of the Torrance facility closure. The Company’s decision resulted from a comprehensive review of alternatives designed to make the Company more competitive and better positioned to capitalize on growth opportunities.
Based on current assumptions and subject to continued implementation of the Corporate Relocation Plan, the Company estimates that it will incur approximately $31 million in cash costs in connection with the exit of the Torrance facility consisting of $18 million in employee retention and separation benefits, $5 million in facility-related costs and $8 million in other related costs. Expenses related to the Corporate Relocation Plan in fiscal 2016 consisted of $9.7 million in employee retention and separation benefits, $3.7 million in facility-related costs including lease of temporary office space, costs associated with the move of the Company's headquarters and the relocation of certain distribution operations and $3.1 million in other related costs including travel, legal, consulting and other professional services. Facility-related costs also included $1.0 million in non-cash depreciation expense associated with the Torrance production facility resulting from the consolidation of coffee production operations with the Houston and Portland production facilities.
Since adoption of the Corporate Relocation Plan through June 30, 2016, the Company has recognized a total of $25.7 million of the estimated $31 million in aggregate cash costs including $16.2 million in employee retention and separation benefits, $3.1 million in facility-related costs related to the relocation of the Company’s Torrance operations and certain distribution operations and $6.4 million in other related costs. The remainder is expected to be recognized in the first half of fiscal 2017. The Company has restated its previously issued consolidated financial statementsalso recognized from inception through fiscal 2016 $1.3 million in non-cash depreciation expense associated with the Torrance production facility. The Company may incur certain other non-cash asset impairment costs and pension-related costs in connection with the Corporate Relocation Plan.

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)


The following table sets forth the activity in liabilities associated with the Corporate Relocation Plan for the fiscal yearsyear ended June 30, 2012, 20112016:
(In thousands)
Balances,
June 30, 2015
 Additions Payments Non-Cash Settled Adjustments 
Balances,
June 30, 2016
Employee-related costs(1)$6,156
 $9,730
 $13,544
 $
 $
 $2,342
Facility-related costs(2)
 3,716
 2,712
 1,004
 
 
Other(3)200
 3,087
 3,087
 
 
 200
   Total(2)$6,356
 $16,533
 $19,343
 $1,004
 $
 $2,542
            
Current portion$6,356
         $2,542
Non-current portion$
         $
   Total$6,356
         $2,542
_______________
(1) Included in “Accrued payroll expenses” on the Company's consolidated balance sheets.
(2) Non-cash settled facility-related costs represent depreciation expense associated with the Torrance production facility resulting from the consolidation of coffee production operations with the Houston and 2010,Portland production facilities and included in "Property, plant and equipment, net" on the Company's consolidated balance sheets.
(3) Included in “Accounts payable” on the Company's consolidated balance sheets.

Note 4. New Facility Lease Obligation
On July 17, 2015, the Company entered into a lease agreement, (as amended the “Lease Agreement”), pursuant to which the New Facility is being constructed by the lessor ("Lessor") at its unaudited quarterly financial information (i) for eachexpense, in accordance with agreed upon specifications and plans determined as set forth in the Lease Agreement. Based on the final budget, which reflects substantial completion of the quartersprincipal design work for the New Facility, the Company estimates that the construction costs for the New Facility will be approximately $55 million to $60 million. The Company recorded an asset related to the New Facility lease obligation included in property, plant and equipment of $28.1 million at June 30, 2016 and an offsetting liability of $28.1 million for the lease obligation in "Other long-term liabilities" on its consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2016 (see Note 19). Rent expense associated with the portion of the lease allocated to the land in the fiscal year ended June 30, 20122016 and (ii)2015 was $0.3 million and $0, respectively. Construction of and relocation to the New Facility is expected to be completed in the third quarter of fiscal 2017.

In conjunction with the Lease Agreement, the Company also entered into a Development Management Agreement (the “DMA”) pursuant to which an affiliate of Stream Realty Partners (“Developer”) has agreed to manage, coordinate, represent, assist and advise the Company on matters concerning the pre-development, development, design, entitlement, infrastructure, site preparation and construction of the New Facility. Pursuant to the DMA, the Company will pay Developer:
a development fee of 3.25% of all development costs;
an oversight fee of 2% of any amounts paid to the Company-contracted parties for any oversight by Developer of Company-contracted work;
an incentive fee, the amount of which will be determined by the parties, if final completion occurs prior to the scheduled completion date; and
an amount equal to $2.6 million as additional fee in respect of development services.
On June 15, 2016, the Company exercised the purchase option under the Lease Agreement to acquire the partially constructed New Facility. The estimated purchase option exercise price for the New Facility is $58.8 million based on the budget for the completed facility. The actual option exercise price for the partially constructed New Facility will depend

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)


upon, among other things, the timing of the closing and the actual costs incurred for construction of the New Facility as of the purchase option closing date.
In addition to the costs to complete the construction of the New Facility, the Company estimates that it will incur $35 million to $39 million for machinery and equipment, furniture and fixtures and related expenditures. As of June 30, 2016, the Company had spent $4.4 million toward the purchase of machinery and equipment for the New Facility. No such capital expenditures were incurred in fiscal 2015. The majority of the capital expenditures associated with machinery and equipment, furniture, fixtures and related expenditures for the New Facility are expected to be incurred in the first half of fiscal 2017.
Note  5. Sale of Spice Assets
In order to focus on its core products, on December 8, 2015, the Company completed the sale of the Spice Assets to Harris. Harris acquired substantially all of the Company’s personal property used exclusively in connection with the Spice Assets, including certain equipment; trademarks, tradenames and other intellectual property assets; contract rights under sales and purchase orders and certain other agreements; and a list of certain customers, other than the Company’s DSD customers, and assumed certain liabilities relating to the Spice Assets. The Company received $6.0 million in cash at closing, and is eligible to receive an earnout amount of up to $5.0 million over a three quartersyear period based upon a percentage of certain institutional spice sales by Harris following the closing. The Company recognized $0.5 million in earnout during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, to correct certain errors as described below:
Postretirement benefit obligations related to retiree medical plan
In fiscal 2011, the Company amended its retiree medical plan to increase the minimum annual premium contribution required by participants. The increased participant contributions and2016, a resulting reduction in the numberportion of participants electing to maintain this benefit coverage were not appropriately considered in the Company's actuarial estimate of its postretirement benefit liability recorded in its consolidated financial statements for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2012 and 2011. This resulted in an overstatement of the amount of accrued postretirement benefits in the Company's consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2012 and 2011 by $20.7 million and $11.2 million, respectively, and an understatement of other comprehensive income in the amounts of $19.2 million and $11.1 million, respectively.
The Company re-measured its postretirement benefit obligations as of June 30, 2012 and 2011, using the appropriate census data and premium information. In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 715-60, "Compensation-Retirement Benefits-Defined Benefit Plans-Other Postretirement" ("ASC 715-60"), the substantial changes to the retiree medical plan resulted in a negative plan amendment and, therefore, the reduction in related obligations is not immediately recognized as a reduction of current period costs butwhich is included in accumulated other comprehensive income.
Postretirement benefit obligations related to death benefit and related cash surrender value ("CSV")
In connection with a postretirement death benefit provided to certainnet gains from the sale of its employees and retirees, the Company did not timely adopt the accounting guidance in Emerging Issues Task Force No. 06-4, “Accounting for Deferred Compensation and Postretirement Benefit Aspects of Endorsement Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements,” as of the applicable effective date, July 1, 2008. As a result, the Company failed to record a liability equal to the present value of the postretirement death benefit, which resulted in an understatement of accrued

48

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

postretirement benefits in the Company's consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2012 and 2011 by $8.1 million and $6.4 million, respectively. In addition, the Company failed to properly record the CSV of the life insurance policies that it purchased to fund the postretirement death benefit, resulting in an understatement of the Company's total assets in its consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2012 and 2011 by $2.2 million and $2.1 million, respectively. The aggregate impact of failure to adopt EITF 06-4 and failure to properly record the CSV resulted in an overstatement of other comprehensive income in fiscal 2012 and 2011 by $2.2 million and $0.8 million, respectively.Spice Assets.
In connection with the restatement,sale of the Spice Assets, the Company also recordedand Harris entered into certain other immaterial adjustments primarily relatedagreements, including (1) a transitional co-packaging supply agreement pursuant to inventory, property, plant and equipment, and net and accrued payroll expenses. In addition,which the Company, appropriately reclassified: (a) cash held on deposit in margin accountsas the contractor, provided Harris with certain transition services for coffee-related derivative instruments from "Short-term investments" to "Restricted cash"; and (b) "Short-term derivative liability" from "Accounts payable" and "Other current liabilities," to conform to currenta six-month transitional period presentation. The Company also correctedfollowing the classification of pension liabilities from "Other current liabilities" to "Accrued pension liabilities."
Aggregate impact of restatement corrections, adjustments and reclassifications:
The aggregate impactclosing of the restatement correctionsasset sale, and adjustments:
increased total(2) an exclusive supply agreement pursuant to which Harris will supply to the Company, after the closing of the asset sale, spice and culinary products that were previously manufactured by the Company on negotiated pricing terms. While title to the Spice Assets transferred at closing, certain of the assets aspurchased by Harris were transferred to Harris' own manufacturing facilities, in phases, during the transitional period. As of June 30, 2012 and 2011; and
decreased total liabilities in fiscal 2012 and 2011 from2016, the decrease in postretirement liability relatedCompany completed all the agreed upon transitional services to the amendmentHarris. The sale of the retiree medical plan, net ofSpice Assets does not represent a strategic shift for the increase in liability relatedCompany and is not expected to the postretirement death benefit.

49

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

A summary of thehave a material impact of the restatement corrections and other immaterial adjustments on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) for fiscal 2012, 2011 and 2010 is presented below:
(In thousands) Overstatement (Understatement) of Net Loss
  Year ended June 30,
Description 2012 2011 2010
Restatement corrections:      
Correction of other postretirement benefit obligations—retiree medical plan $1,356
 $105
 $
Correction of other postretirement benefit obligations—death benefit (22) (1,022) 38
Tax effect of corrections of other postretirement benefit obligations 
 4,230
 1
Net impact of restatement corrections on net loss 1,334
 3,313
 39
Immaterial adjustments:      
Correction of coffee brewing equipment expense (233) 233
 (1,542)
Correction of accrued fringe benefits liability 1,471
 (1,471) 487
Correction of inventory 310
 80
 (390)
Correction of net periodic pension costs (129) 129
 
Total impact of immaterial adjustments on net loss 1,419
 (1,029) (1,445)
Total impact of restatement corrections and immaterial adjustments on net loss $2,753
 $2,284
 $(1,406)
       
       
       
(In thousands) 
Overstatement (Understatement) of
 Total Comprehensive Loss (Income)
  Year ended June 30,
Description 2012 2011 2010
Total impact of restatement corrections and immaterial adjustments on net loss $2,753
 $2,284
 $(1,406)
Restatement corrections:      
Correction of postretirement benefit obligations—retiree medical plan 8,120
 11,074
 
Correction of postretirement benefit obligations—death benefit (1,482) 152
 (1,151)
Tax effect of corrections of other postretirement benefit obligations 
 (4,230) 
Net impact of restatement corrections on total comprehensive loss (income) $6,638
 $6,996
 $(1,151)
Immaterial adjustments:      
Correction of net periodic pension costs 129
 (129) 
Total impact of immaterial adjustments on total comprehensive loss (income) 129
 (129) 
Total impact of restatement corrections and immaterial adjustments on total comprehensive loss (income) $9,520
 $9,151
 $(2,557)
The restatement corrections and immaterial adjustments had no effect on the Company's reported net sales, cash flowsresults of operations because the Company will continue to sell a complete portfolio of spice and other culinary products purchased from operating activities, or reported cash position in fiscal 2012, 2011 and 2010.Harris under the supply agreement to its DSD customers.
The restated consolidated financial information as of
Note 6. Assets Held for Sale
At June 30, 20122016, the Company had listed for sale its Torrance facility and 2011,one of its branch properties in Northern California. The Company actively marketed these properties, entered into purchase and sale agreements with prospective buyers and expected these properties to be sold within one year. Accordingly, the Company designated these properties as assets held for sale and recorded the carrying values of the end of the quarters within fiscal 2012 and the first three quarters within fiscal 2013, included in this Form 10‑K has been labeled as "As Restated."
The following tablesthese properties in the remainderaggregate amount of this Note 2 and in Note 19 present the impact of the restatement corrections and immaterial adjustments$7.2 million as "Assets held for sale" on the Company's previously issued financial statementsconsolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2016. Subsequent to the year end the sale transaction for the periods indicated.

50

Farmer Bros. Co.
Torrance facility was completed (see Note 24Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)).

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
(In thousands, except share and per share data)June 30, 2012
 Previously Reported Adjustments(1) As Restated
ASSETS 
Current assets:     
Cash and cash equivalents$3,906
 $
 $3,906
Restricted cash
 1,612
 1,612
Short-term investments21,021
 (1,285) 19,736
Accounts and notes receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,87240,736
 
 40,736
Inventories65,981
 
 65,981
Income tax receivable762
 
 762
Prepaid expenses3,445
 
 3,445
Total current assets135,851
 327
 136,178
Property, plant and equipment, net108,135
 2
 108,137
Intangible assets, net7,615
 
 7,615
Other assets2,904
 2,221
 5,125
Deferred income taxes854
 7
 861
Total assets$255,359
 $2,557
 $257,916
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY     
Current liabilities:     
Accounts payable$27,676
 $(410) $27,266
Accrued payroll expenses20,494
 (1,364) 19,130
Short-term borrowings under revolving credit facility29,126
 
 29,126
Short-term obligations under capital leases3,737
 
 3,737
Short-term derivative liability
 737
 737
Deferred income taxes1,480
 (35) 1,445
Other current liabilities10,176
 (4,880) 5,296
Total current liabilities92,689
 (5,952) 86,737
Accrued postretirement benefits34,557
 (12,031) 22,526
Other long-term liabilities—capital leases12,130
 
 12,130
Accrued pension liabilities42,513
 5,678
 48,191
Accrued workers’ compensation liabilities4,131
 
 4,131
Deferred income taxes607
 42
 649
Total liabilities$186,627
 $(12,263) $174,364
Commitments and contingencies     
Stockholders’ equity:     
Preferred stock, $1.00 par value, 500,000 shares authorized and none issued$
 $
 $
Common stock, $1.00 par value, 25,000,000 shares authorized; 16,308,859 issued and outstanding16,309
 
 16,309
Additional paid-in capital34,834
 
 34,834
Retained earnings100,455
 2,087
 102,542
Unearned ESOP shares(25,637) 
 (25,637)
Less accumulated other comprehensive loss(57,229) 12,733
 (44,496)
Total stockholders’ equity$68,732
 $14,820
 $83,552
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity$255,359
 $2,557
 $257,916
_______________ 
(1)For details see the introduction section included elsewhere in this Note 2.


51

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
(In thousands, except share and per share data)June 30, 2011
 Previously Reported Adjustments (1) As Restated
ASSETS     
Current assets:     
Cash and cash equivalents$6,081
 $
 $6,081
Restricted cash
 460
 460
Short-term investments24,874
 (460) 24,414
Accounts and notes receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $2,85243,501
 
 43,501
Inventories79,759
 (310) 79,449
Income tax receivable448
 
 448
Prepaid expenses2,747
 
 2,747
Total current assets157,410
 (310) 157,100
Property, plant and equipment, net114,107
 233
 114,340
Goodwill5,310
 
 5,310
Intangible assets, net9,329
 
 9,329
Other assets2,892
 2,071
 4,963
Deferred income taxes1,005
 3
 1,008
Total assets$290,053
 $1,997
 $292,050
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY     
Current liabilities:     
Accounts payable$42,473
 $(51) $42,422
Accrued payroll expenses15,675
 1,283
 16,958
Short-term borrowings under revolving credit facility31,362
 
 31,362
Short-term obligations under capital leases1,570
 
 1,570
Short-term derivative liabilities
 1,729
 1,729
Deferred income taxes500
 (24) 476
Other current liabilities11,882
 (7,355) 4,527
Total current liabilities103,462
 (4,418) 99,044
Accrued postretirement benefits23,585
 (4,589) 18,996
Other long-term liabilities—capital leases7,066
 
 7,066
Accrued pension liabilities22,371
 5,677
 28,048
Accrued workers’ compensation liabilities3,639
 
 3,639
Deferred income taxes1,815
 27
 1,842
Total liabilities$161,938
 $(3,303) $158,635
Commitments and contingencies     
Stockholders’ equity:     
Preferred stock, $1.00 par value, 500,000 shares authorized and none issued$
 $
 $
Common stock, $1.00 par value, 25,000,000 shares authorized; 16,186,372 issued and outstanding16,186
 
 16,186
Additional paid-in capital36,470
 
 36,470
Retained earnings129,784
 (666) 129,118
Unearned ESOP shares(30,437) 
 (30,437)
Less accumulated other comprehensive loss(23,888) 5,966
 (17,922)
Total stockholders’ equity$128,115
 $5,300
 $133,415
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity$290,053
 $1,997
 $292,050
_______________ 
(1)For details see the introduction section included elsewhere in this Note 2.


52

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except share and per share data)Year ended June 30, 2012
 Previously Reported Adjustments(1) As Restated
Net sales$495,442
 $
 $495,442
Cost of goods sold322,618
 (78) 322,540
Gross profit172,824
 78
 172,902
Selling expenses150,641
 
 150,641
General and administrative expenses36,897
 (2,675) 34,222
Impairment losses on goodwill and intangible assets5,585
 
 5,585
Pension withdrawal expense4,568
 
 4,568
Operating expenses197,691
 (2,675) 195,016
(Loss) income from operations(24,867) 2,753
 (22,114)
Other income (expense):     
Dividend income1,231
 
 1,231
Interest income214
 
 214
Interest expense(2,137) 
 (2,137)
Other, net(4,117) 
 (4,117)
Total other expense(4,809) 
 (4,809)
(Loss) income before taxes(29,676) 2,753
 (26,923)
Income tax benefit(347) 
 (347)
Net (loss) income$(29,329) $2,753
 $(26,576)
Net (loss) income per common share—basic and diluted$(1.89) 

 $(1.72)
Weighted average common shares outstanding—basic and diluted15,492,314
 

 15,492,314

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(In thousands)Year Ended June 30, 2012
 Previously Reported Adjustments(1) As Restated
Net (loss) income$(29,329) $2,753
 $(26,576)
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax:     
    Change in the funded status of retiree benefit obligations(33,341) 6,767
 (26,574)
    Income tax benefit
 
 
Total comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax$(62,670) $9,520
 $(53,150)
_______________ 
(1) See summary table of the impact of the restatement corrections and immaterial adjustments on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) included elsewhere in this Note 2.



53

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except share and per share data)Year ended June 30, 2011
 Previously Reported Adjustments(1) As Restated
Net sales$463,945
 $
 $463,945
Cost of goods sold306,771
 (313) 306,458
Gross profit157,174
 313
 157,487
Selling expenses170,670
 
 170,670
General and administrative expenses47,121
 2,258
 49,379
Impairment losses on intangible assets7,805
 
 7,805
Operating expenses225,596
 2,258
 227,854
Loss from operations(68,422) (1,945) (70,367)
Other income (expense):     
Dividend income2,534
 
 2,534
Interest income178
 
 178
Interest expense(1,965) 
 (1,965)
Other, net4,191
 
 4,191
Total other income4,938
 
 4,938
Loss before taxes(63,484) (1,945) (65,429)
Income tax benefit(9,167) (4,229) (13,396)
Net (loss) income$(54,317) $2,284
 $(52,033)
Net (loss) income per common share—basic and diluted$(3.61) 
 $(3.45)
Weighted average common shares outstanding—basic and diluted15,066,663
 

 15,066,663
Cash dividends declared per common share$0.18
 

 $0.18

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(In thousands)Year Ended June 30, 2011
 Previously Reported Adjustments(1) As Restated
Net loss (income)$(54,317) $2,284
 $(52,033)
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax:     
Change in the funded status of retiree benefit obligations25,634
 11,097
 36,731
    Income tax expense(9,823) (4,230) (14,053)
Total comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax$(38,506) $9,151
 $(29,355)
_______________ 
(1) See summary table of the impact of the restatement corrections and immaterial adjustments on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) included elsewhere in this Note 2.




54

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

(In thousands, except share and per share data)Year ended June 30, 2010
 Previously Reported Adjustments(1) As Restated
Net sales$450,318
 $
 $450,318
Cost of goods sold252,754
 1,932
 254,686
Gross profit197,564
 (1,932) 195,632
Selling expenses187,685
 (395) 187,290
General and administrative expenses49,071
 (130) 48,941
Operating expenses236,756
 (525) 236,231
Loss from operations(39,192) (1,407) (40,599)
Other income (expense):     
Dividend income3,224
 
 3,224
Interest income303
 
 303
Interest expense(986) 
 (986)
Other, net10,169
 
 10,169
Total other income12,710
 
 12,710
Loss before taxes(26,482) (1,407) (27,889)
Income tax benefit(2,529) (1) (2,530)
Net loss$(23,953) $(1,406) $(25,359)
Net loss per common share—basic and diluted$(1.61)   $(1.71)
Weighted average common shares outstanding—basic and diluted14,866,306
   14,866,306
Cash dividends declared per common share$0.46
 

 $0.46

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(In thousands)Year Ended June 30, 2010
 Previously Reported Adjustments(1) As Restated
Net loss$(23,953) $(1,406) (25,359)
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax:     
    Change in the funded status of retiree benefit obligations(4,787) (1,151) (5,938)
    Income tax expense
 
 
Total comprehensive loss, net of tax$(28,740) $(2,557) $(31,297)
_______________ 
(1) See summary table of the impact of the restatement corrections and immaterial adjustments on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) included elsewhere in this Note 2.



55

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)Year Ended June 30, 2012
 Previously Reported Adjustments(1) As Restated
Cash flows from operating activities:     
Net (loss) income$(29,329) $2,753
 $(26,576)
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by operating activities:     
Depreciation and amortization32,113
 
 32,113
Recovery of doubtful accounts(980) 
 (980)
Deferred income taxes(78) 
 (78)
Impairment losses on goodwill and intangible assets5,585
 
 5,585
Net gains on sales of assets(268) 
 (268)
ESOP and share-based compensation expense3,287
 
 3,287
Net losses on derivatives and investments6,175
 
 6,175
Change in operating assets and liabilities:     
Restricted cash
 (1,153) (1,153)
Short-term investments(2,322) 825
 (1,497)
Accounts and notes receivable3,745
 
 3,745
Inventories13,314
 (78) 13,236
Income tax receivable(314) 
 (314)
Prepaid expenses and other assets(711) (149) (860)
Accounts payable(13,083) (358) (13,441)
Accrued payroll expenses and other liabilities3,112
 (1,163) 1,949
Accrued postretirement benefits995
 2,535
 3,530
Other long-term liabilities(3,108) (3,212) (6,320)
Net cash provided by operating activities$18,133
 $
 $18,133
Cash flows from investing activities:     
Purchases of property, plant and equipment(17,498) 
 (17,498)
Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment3,037
 
 3,037
Net cash used in investing activities$(14,461) $
 $(14,461)
Cash flows from financing activities:     
Proceeds from revolving credit facility17,250
 
 17,250
Repayments on revolving credit facility(21,200) 
 (21,200)
Payments of capital lease obligations(1,897) 
 (1,897)
Net cash used in financing activities$(5,847) $
 $(5,847)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents$(2,175) $
 $(2,175)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year6,081
   6,081
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year$3,906
 $
 $3,906
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:     
    Cash paid for interest$2,123
 $
 $2,123
    Cash paid for income taxes$317
 $
 $317
    Non-cash financing and investing activities:     
    Equipment acquired under capital leases$9,508
 $
 $9,508
_______________ 
(1)See the introduction section included elsewhere in this Note 2.






56

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)Year Ended June 30, 2011
 Previously Reported Adjustments (1) As Restated
Cash flows from operating activities:     
Net (loss) income$(54,317) $2,284
 $(52,033)
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by operating activities:     
Depreciation and amortization31,758
 
 31,758
Provision for doubtful accounts2,024
 
 2,024
Deferred income taxes336
 2
 338
Impairment losses on goodwill and intangible assets7,805
 
 7,805
Net losses on sales of assets358
 
 358
ESOP and share-based compensation expense3,825
 
 3,825
Net gains on derivatives and investments(1,312) 
 (1,312)
Change in operating assets and liabilities:     
Restricted cash
 (460) (460)
Short-term investments27,381
 913
 28,294
Accounts and notes receivable(2,929) 
 (2,929)
Inventories3,952
 (312) 3,640
Income tax receivable5,392
 
 5,392
Prepaid expenses and other assets(434) 834
 400
Accounts payable12,997
 (504) 12,493
Accrued payroll expenses and other liabilities2,112
 44
 2,156
Accrued postretirement benefits1,399
 (10,956) (9,557)
Other long-term liabilities(6,410) 8,155
 1,745
Net cash provided by operating activities$33,937
 $
 $33,937
Cash flows from investing activities:     
Purchases of property, plant and equipment(19,416) 
 (19,416)
Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment2,021
 
 2,021
Net cash used in investing activities$(17,395) $
 $(17,395)
Cash flows from financing activities:     
Proceeds from revolving credit facility35,450
 
 35,450
Repayments on revolving credit facility(43,970) 
 (43,970)
Payments of capital lease obligations(1,433) 
 (1,433)
Dividends paid(4,657) 
 (4,657)
Net cash used in financing activities$(14,610) $
 $(14,610)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents$1,932
 $
 $1,932
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year4,149
 
 4,149
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year$6,081
 $
 $6,081
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:     
    Cash paid for interest$1,945
 $
 $1,945
    Cash paid for income taxes$324
 $
 $324
    Non-cash financing and investing activities:     
    Equipment acquired under capital leases$5,659
 $
 $5,659
    Dividends accrued, but not paid     
      
_______________ 
(1)See the introduction section included elsewhere in this Note 2.



57

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)Year Ended June 30, 2010
 Previously Reported Adjustments (1) As Restated
Cash flows from operating activities:     
Net loss$(23,953) $(1,406) $(25,359)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:     
Depreciation and amortization26,778
 
 26,778
Provision for doubtful accounts3,188
 
 3,188
Deferred income taxes758
 427
 1,185
Net losses on sales of assets430
 
 430
ESOP and share-based compensation expense4,785
 (1) 4,784
Net gain on derivatives and investments(9,382) 
 (9,382)
Change in operating assets and liabilities:     
Restricted cash
 
 
Short-term investments1,365
 (453) 912
Accounts and notes receivable(40) 
 (40)
Inventories(14,751) 1,932
 (12,819)
Income tax receivable(1,677) 
 (1,677)
Prepaid expenses and other assets178
 (187) (9)
Accounts payable(738) 617
 (121)
Accrued payroll expenses and other liabilities2,904
 (542) 2,362
Accrued postretirement benefits3,926
 1,302
 5,228
Other long-term liabilities5,182
 (1,689) 3,493
Net cash provided by operating activities$(1,047) $
 $(1,047)
Cash flows from investing activities:     
Purchases of property, plant and equipment(28,484) 
 (28,484)
Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment437
 
 437
Net cash used in investing activities$(28,047) $
 $(28,047)
Cash flows from financing activities:     
Proceeds from revolving credit facility33,737
 
 33,737
Repayments on revolving credit facility(12,756) 
 (12,756)
Payments of capital lease obligations(837) 
 (837)
Dividends paid(6,939) 
 (6,939)
Net cash used in financing activities$13,205
 $
 $13,205
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents$(15,889) $
 $(15,889)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year20,038
 
 20,038
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year$4,149
 $
 $4,149
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:     
    Cash paid for interest$890
 $
 $890
    Cash paid for income taxes$154
 $
 $154
    Non-cash financing and investing activities:     
    Equipment acquired under capital leases$3,954
 $
 $3,954
    Dividends accrued, but not paid$1,849
 $
 $1,849
      
_______________ 
(1)See the introduction section included elsewhere in this Note 2.



58

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

Note 3.7. Derivative Instruments

Derivative Instruments Held
Coffee-Related Derivative Instruments

The Company is exposed to commodity price risk associated with its PTF green coffee purchase contracts, which are described further in Note 1.1. The Company utilizes futuresforward and option contracts and options to manage exposure to the variability in expected future cash flows from forecasted purchases of green coffee attributable to commodity price risk, in some instances, as much as 18 months prior to the actual delivery date.risk. Certain of these coffee-related derivative instruments utilized for risk management purposes have been designated as cash flow hedges, while other coffee-related derivative instruments have not been designated as cash flow hedges or do not qualify for hedge accounting despite hedging the Company's future cash flows on an economic basis.

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)


At June 30, 2013, approximately 89% ofThe following table summarizes the Company's outstandingnotional volumes for the coffee-related derivative instruments wereheld by the Company at June 30, 2016 and 2015:
  June 30,
(In thousands) 2016 2015
Derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges:    
  Long coffee pounds 32,550
 32,288
Derivative instruments not designated as cash flow hedges:    
  Long coffee pounds 1,618
 1,954
  Less: Short coffee pounds (188) 
      Total 33,980
 34,242
Coffee-related derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges. Athedges outstanding as of June 30, 2012 no coffee-related derivative instruments were designated as accounting hedges.
For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, the Company recorded coffee-related net derivative losses in OCI in the amount of $7.9 million. No coffee-related net derivative gains or losses were recorded in OCI for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2012 and 2011.
Interest Rate Swap
Effective December 1, 2012, the Company entered into an interest rate swap transaction utilizing a notional amount of $10.0 million and a maturity date of March 1, 2015. The Company entered into the swap transaction to effectively fix thefuture interest rate during the applicable period on a portion of its borrowings under the revolving credit facility. The swap transaction is intended to manage the Company's interest rate risk related to its revolving credit facility and requires the Company to pay a fixed rate of 0.48% per annum in exchange for a variable interest rate based on 1-month USD LIBOR-BBA. The interest rate swap is not designated as an accounting hedge.2016 will expire within 18 months.

Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Financial Statements
Balance SheetSheets
Fair values of derivative instruments on the consolidated balance sheets (in thousands):sheets:
  Derivatives Designated as Cash Flow Hedges Derivatives Not Designated as Accounting Hedges
  June 30, June 30,
  2013 2012 2013 2012
Financial Statement Location:   As Restated   As Restated
Short-term investments:        
Coffee-related derivatives $
 $
 $4
 $339
Short-term derivative liability:        
Coffee futures $9,331
 $
 $565
 $737
Other current liabilities:        
Interest rate swap $
 $
 $25
 $
Long-term derivative liability:        
Coffee futures $1,129
 $
 $
 $
  
Derivative Instruments
Designated as Cash Flow Hedges
 Derivative Instruments Not Designated as Accounting Hedges
  June 30, June 30,
(In thousands) 2016(1) 2015(2) 2016(1) 2015(2)
Financial Statement Location:        
Short-term derivative assets:        
Coffee-related derivative instruments $3,771
 $128
 $183
 $25
Long-term derivative assets:        
Coffee-related derivative instruments $2,575
 $136
 $57
 $2
Short-term derivative liabilities:        
Coffee-related derivative instruments $
 $4,128
 $
 $2
Long-term derivative liabilities:        
Coffee-related derivative instruments $
 $163
 $
 $

________________
Statement of Operations
For(1) Included in "Short-term derivative assets" and "Other assets" on the fiscal year endedCompany's consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2013,2016.
(2) Included in "Short-term derivative liabilities" and "Other long-term liabilities" on the Company recognized $0.4 million in losses on coffee-related derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges for ineffectiveness and 11% of the total coffee-related derivative instruments wereCompany's consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2015.

59

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)


excluded from the effectiveness assessment since they were not designated as cash flow hedges. Cash flow hedge contracts outstanding as of June 30, 2013 will expire within 18 months.

Statements of Operations
The following table presents pretax net gains and losses for the Company's coffee-related derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges, as recognized in "Cost“AOCI,” “Cost of goods sold," "Accumulated other comprehensive income" ("AOCI")sold” and "Other, net" (in thousands)“Other, net”:
  Year Ended June 30,  
  2013 2012 2011 Financial Statement Classification
Net gains recognized in earnings (effective portion) $55
 $
 $
 Costs of goods sold
Net losses recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) (effective portion) $(7,921) $
 $
 AOCI
Net losses recognized in earnings (ineffective portion) $(447) $
 $
 Other, net

  Year Ended June 30,Financial Statement Classification
(In thousands) 2016 2015 2014 
Net gains (losses) recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (effective portion) $303
 $(14,295) $17,524
 AOCI
Net (losses) gains recognized in earnings (effective portion) $(13,184) $4,211
 $1,161
 Costs of goods sold
Net losses recognized in earnings (ineffective portion) $(575) $(325) $(259) Other, net
For the yearyears ended June 30, 2013,2016, 2015 and 2014, there were no gains or losses recognized in incomeearnings as a result of excluding amounts from the assessment of hedge effectiveness or as a result of reclassifications to earnings following the discontinuance of any cash flow hedges.
Gains and losses on derivativesderivative instruments not designated as accounting hedges are included in "Other, net"“Other, net” in the Company's consolidated statements of operations and in "Net“Net losses (gains) on derivativesderivative instruments and investments"investments” in the Company's consolidated statements of cash flow.flows.
Net realized and unrealized gains and losses recorded in "Other, net"“Other, net” are as follows:
  Year Ended June 30,
  2013 2012 2011
  (In thousands)
Realized (losses) gains, net $(8,676) $(8,577) $916
Unrealized (losses) gains, net (2,661) 1,248
 (2,402)
Net realized and unrealized losses from coffee-related derivatives not designated as accounting hedges (11,337) (7,329) (1,486)
Net realized and unrealized gains from investments 230
 1,154
 2,798
Net unrealized losses from interest rate swap (25) 
 
Net (losses) gains on derivatives and investments (11,132) (6,175) 1,312
Net gains from sales of assets 4,467
 1,375
 1,359
Other gains, net 1,700
 683
 1,520
Other, net $(4,965) $(4,117) $4,191
  Year Ended June 30,
(In thousands) 2016 2015 2014
Net (losses) gains on coffee-related derivative instruments $(298) $(2,992) $2,655
Net gains (losses) on investments 611
 (270) 464
Net losses on interest rate swap 
 
 (5)
     Net gains (losses) on derivative instruments and investments(1) 313
 (3,262) 3,114
     Other gains, net 243
 248
 563
             Other, net $556
 $(3,014) $3,677
Credit-Risk-Related Features___________
(1) Excludes net (losses) gains on coffee-related derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges recorded in cost of goods sold in the fiscal years ended June 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014.

Offsetting of Derivative Assets and Liabilities
The Company does not have any credit-risk-related contingent featureshas agreements in place that would require it,allow for the financial right of offset for derivative assets and liabilities at settlement or in certain circumstances,the event of default under the agreements. Additionally, the Company maintains accounts with its brokers to post additional collateralfacilitate financial derivative transactions in support of its risk management activities. Based on the value of the Company’s positions in these accounts and the associated margin requirements, the Company may be required to deposit cash into these broker accounts.
The following table presents the Company’s net exposure from its offsetting derivative asset and liability positions. The Company had $8.1 million and $1.6 million, respectively, in restrictedpositions, as well as cash representing cash heldcollateral on deposit in margin accounts for coffee-related derivative instruments at June 30, 2013 and 2012 (see Note 6). Changes in commodity prices could have a significant impact on cash deposit requirements underwith its counterparty as of the Company's broker and counterparty agreements.reporting dates indicated:
(In thousands)   Gross Amount Reported on Balance Sheet Netting Adjustments Cash Collateral Posted Net Exposure
June 30, 2016 Derivative Assets $6,586
 $
 $
 $6,586
June 30, 2015 Derivative Assets $291
 $(291) $
 $
  Derivative Liabilities $4,292
 $(291) $1,001
 $3,000

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)


Cash Flow Hedges
Changes in the fair value of the Company's coffee-related derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges, to the extent effective, are deferred in AOCI and reclassified into earningscost of goods sold in the same period or periods in which the hedged forecasted purchases affect earnings, or when it is probable that the hedged forecasted transaction will not occur by the end of the originally specified time period. Based on recorded values at June 30, 2013, $6.82016, $2.0 million of net losses willgains on coffee-related derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges are expected to be reclassified

60

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

into earningscost of goods sold within the next twelve months. These recorded values are based on market prices of the commodities as of June 30, 2013.2016. Due to the volatile nature of commodity prices, actual gains or losses realized within the next twelve months will likely differ from these values. These gains or losses are expected to substantially offset net losses or gains that will be realized in earnings from previous unfavorable or favorable market movements associated with underlying hedged transactions.
Note 4.8. Investments
Preferred stock investments as of June 30, 2013 consisted of securities with a fair value of $13.2 million in an unrealized gain position and securities with a fair value of $7.3 million in an unrealized loss position. Preferred stock investments as of June 30, 2012 consisted of securities with a fair value of $16.5 million in an unrealized gain position and securities with a fair value of $2.9 million in an unrealized loss position.
The following tables show gross unrealizedtable shows gains and losses (although such losses have been recognized in the consolidated statements of operations) and fair valueon trading securities held for those investments that were in an unrealized loss position as of June 30, 2013 and 2012, aggregatedinvestment by the length of time those investments have been in a continuous loss position:Company: 
 June 30, 2013
 Less than 12 Months Total Year Ended June 30,
(In thousands) Fair Value Unrealized Loss Fair Value Unrealized Loss 2016 2015 2014
Preferred stock $5,391
 $(161) $7,318
 $(228)
        
        
 June 30, 2012
 Less than 12 Months Total
(In thousands) Fair Value Unrealized Loss Fair Value Unrealized Loss
Preferred stock $1,750
 $(16) $2,891
 $(40)
        
Total gains (losses) recognized from trading securities held for investment $611
 $(270) $464
Less: Realized gains from sales of trading securities held for investment 29
 89
 116
Unrealized gains (losses) from trading securities held for investment $582
 $(359) $348

Note 5.9. Fair Value Measurements
The Company groups its assets and liabilities at fair value in three levels, based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value. These levels are:
Level 1—Valuation is based upon quoted prices for identical instruments traded in active markets.
Level 2—Valuation is based upon quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market.
Level 3—Valuation is generated from model-based techniques that use significant assumptions not observable in the market. These unobservable assumptions reflect estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Valuation techniques include use of option pricing models, discounted cash flow models and similar techniques.

61

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)


Assets and liabilities measured and recorded at fair value on a recurring basis were as follows (in thousands):follows: 
June 30, 2013 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Preferred stock(1) $20,542
 $15,738
 $4,804
 $
Futures, options and other derivative assets(1) $4
 $
 $4
 $
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges: 
      
Coffee-related derivative liabilities $10,460
 $10,460
 $
 $
Derivatives not designated as accounting hedges:        
Coffee-related derivative liabilities $565
 $565
 $
 $
Derivative liabilities — interest rate swap $25
 $
 $25
 $
         
June 30, 2012 (As Restated) Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Preferred stock(1) $19,395
 $14,078
 $5,317
 $
Futures, options and other derivative assets(1) $341
 $
 $341
 $
Derivative liabilities $737
 $
 $737
 $
(In thousands) Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
June 30, 2016        
Preferred stock(1) $25,591
 $21,976
 $3,615
 $
Derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges:        
Coffee-related derivative assets(2) $6,346
 $
 $6,346
 $
Coffee-related derivative liabilities(2) $
 $
 $
 $
Derivative instruments not designated as accounting hedges:        
Coffee-related derivative assets(2) $240
 $
 $240
 $
Coffee-related derivative liabilities(2) $
 $
 $
 $
         
  Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
June 30, 2015        
Preferred stock(1) $23,665
 $19,132
 $4,533
 $
Derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges:        
Coffee-related derivative assets(2) $264
 $
 $264

$
Coffee-related derivative liabilities(2) $4,290
 $
 $4,290
 $
Derivative instruments not designated as accounting hedges:        
Coffee-related derivative assets(2) $27
 $
 $27
 $
Coffee-related derivative liabilities(2) $2
 $
 $2
 $
         
____________________ 
(1)Included in "Short-term investments"“Short-term investments” on the Company's consolidated balance sheets.
(2)The Company's coffee derivative instruments are traded over-the-counter and, therefore, classified as Level 2.

There were no significant transfersDuring the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016, there was one transfer of securities betweenpreferred stock from Level 1 to Level 2, resulting from a decrease in the quantity and Level 2.
Effective December 1, 2012, the Company entered into an interest rate swap transaction utilizing a notional amountquality of $10.0 million and a maturity date of March 1, 2015. The Company entered into the swap transaction to effectively fix the future interest rate during the applicable period on a portion of its borrowings under the revolving credit facility. The swap transaction is intended to manage the Company's interest rate riskinformation related to its revolving credit facilitytrading activity and requires the Company to pay a fixed rate of 0.48% per annum in exchangebroker quotes for a variable interest rate based on 1-month USD LIBOR-BBA.that security.The
The Company values its interest rate swap using widely accepted valuation techniques, including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of the interest rate swap. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the interest rate swap, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves and implied volatilities.
Valuation of the interest rate swap transaction is based on proprietary curves that take into account both Level 1 and Level 2 inputs. The fair value of the interest rate swap is determined using the market standard methodology of netting the discounted future fixed cash payments and the discounted expected variable cash receipts. The variable cash receipts are based on an expectation of future interest rates (forward curves). These forward curves are market-based, utilizing observable market data. Discount curves for present value purposes are constructed using rates representing estimated costs of funding swap positions for early terminations based on an appropriate observable discount rate.

Note 6. Restricted Cash
The Company had $8.1 million and $1.6 million, respectively, in restricted cash representing cash held on deposit in margin accounts for coffee-related derivative instruments at June 30, 2013 and 2012. Changes in commodity prices could have a significant impact on cash deposit requirements under the Company's broker and counterparty agreements.



62

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)


Company's coffee derivative instruments that were previously classified as Level 1 were appropriately reclassified as Level 2 because they are traded over-the-counter.
Note 7.10. Accounts and Notes Receivable, Net
 June 30, June 30,
 2013 2012
 (In thousands)
(In thousands) 2016 2015
Trade receivables $43,965
 $40,687
 $43,113
 $38,783
Other receivables 1,072
 1,921
Other receivables(1) 1,965
 2,021
Allowance for doubtful accounts (1,115) (1,872) (714) (643)
 $43,922
 $40,736
Accounts and notes receivable, net $44,364
 $40,161
In fiscal 2010, based on a larger customer base due to recent Company acquisitions__________
(1) At June 30, 2016 and in response to slower collection of the Company’s accounts receivable resulting from the impact of the economic downturn on the Company’s customers,2015, respectively, the Company had recorded a $3.2$0.5 million charge to bad debt expense resulting and $0 in a net increase of $2.1 million"Other receivables" included in "Accounts and notes receivable, net" on its allowance for doubtful accounts. In fiscal 2013, fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2011, due to improvements in the collection of past due accounts, the Company reduced its allowance for doubtful accounts by $0.8 million, $1.0 million and $0.4 million, respectively.consolidated balance sheets representing earnout receivable from Harris.

Allowance for doubtful accounts: 
(In thousands) 
Balance at June 30, 2010$(3,293)
Additions(2,024)
Write-offs2,465
Balance at June 30, 2011(2,852)
Recovery980
Write-offs
Balance at June 30, 2012(1,872)
Recovery757
Write-offs
Balance at June 30, 2013$(1,115)
(In thousands) 
Balance at June 30, 2013$(1,115)
Provision(80)
Reclassification to long-term544
Balance at June 30, 2014$(651)
Recovery8
Balance at June 30, 2015$(643)
Provision(71)
Write-off$
Balance at June 30, 2016$(714)

Note 8.11. Inventories
June 30, 2013 Processed Unprocessed Total
 (In thousands)
Coffee $12,553
 $12,796
 $25,349
Tea and culinary products 21,406
 4,194
 25,600
Coffee brewing equipment 5,144
 4,774
 9,918
 $39,103
 $21,764
 $60,867
      
       June 30,
 Processed Unprocessed Total
June 30, 2012 (In thousands)
(In thousands) 2016 2015
Coffee $15,485
 $11,836
 $27,321
    
Processed $12,362
 $13,837
Unprocessed 13,534
 11,968
Total $25,896
 $25,805
Tea and culinary products 24,502
 4,817
 29,319
    
Coffee brewing equipment 3,977
 5,364
 9,341
 $43,964
 $22,017
 $65,981
Processed $15,384
 $17,022
Unprocessed 377
 2,764
Total $15,761
 $19,786
Coffee brewing equipment parts $4,721
 $4,931
Total inventories $46,378
 $50,522

In addition to product cost, inventory costs include expenditures such as direct labor and certain supply and overhead expenses incurred in bringing the inventory to its existing condition and location. The “Unprocessed” inventory values as stated in the above table represent the value of raw materials and the “Processed” inventory values represent all other products consisting primarily of finished goods.
Inventories decreased at the end of fiscal 2016 compared to fiscal 2015, primarily due to production consolidation and the sale of processed and unprocessed inventories to Harris at cost upon conclusion of the transition services provided by the
63

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)


Company in connection with the sale of the Spice Assets. Inventories decreased at the end of fiscal 2015 compared to fiscal 2014, primarily due to the consolidation of the Company's Torrance coffee production with its coffee production in Houston and Portland as part of the Corporate Relocation Plan. As a result, the Company recorded in cost of goods sold $4.2 million and $4.9 million in beneficial effect of liquidation of LIFO inventory quantities in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, which increased net income for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 by $4.2 million and $4.9 million, respectively. Inventories increased at the end of fiscal 2014 compared to fiscal 2013 and, therefore, there was no similar benefit to cost of goods sold in fiscal 2014.
Current cost of coffee, tea and culinary product inventories exceeds the LIFO cost by:
  June 30,
(In thousands) 2016 2015
Coffee $14,462
 $25,541
Tea and culinary products 7,139
 8,200
Total $21,601
 $33,741
  June 30,
(In thousands) 2013 2012
Coffee $27,755
 $34,844
Tea and culinary products 7,757
 7,239
Total $35,512
 $42,083

In fiscal 2013, as a result of optimizing and simplifying its product portfolio and discontinuing over 800 SKU's, the Company established a reserve for slow-moving and obsolete inventory in the amount of $0.7 million.
In fiscal 2013 and 2012, certain inventory quantities were reduced. This reduction resulted in the liquidation of LIFO inventory quantities carried at lower costs prevailing in prior years. The beneficial effect of this liquidation of LIFO inventory quantities reduced cost of goods sold and net loss for fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011 by $1.1 million, $14.2 million and $1.1 million, respectively.

Note 9.12. Property, Plant and Equipment 
 June 30, June 30,
 2013 2012
 (In thousands)
(In thousands) 2016 2015
Buildings and facilities $77,807
 $78,608
 $54,768
 $79,040
Machinery and equipment 138,470
 129,846
 182,227
 172,432
Buildings and facilities—New Facility(1) 28,110
 
Equipment under capital leases 18,806
 19,731
 11,982
 18,562
Capitalized software 17,993
 18,524
 21,545
 19,703
Office furniture and equipment 15,610
 16,818
 16,077
 15,005
 $268,686
 $263,527
 $314,709
 $304,742
Accumulated depreciation (185,718) (164,661) (206,162) (223,660)
Land 9,191
 9,271
 9,869
 9,119
Property, plant and equipment, net(2) $92,159
 $108,137
 $118,416
 $90,201
______________
(1) Asset recorded to offset New Facility lease obligation recorded in "Other long-term liabilities" (see Note 19).
(2) Includes in the years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, expenditures for items that have not been placed in service in the amounts of $39.3 million and $2.5 million, respectively.

Capital leases consistconsisted mainly of vehicle leases at June 30, 20132016 and 2012.2015. Depreciation and amortization expense includes amortization expense for assets recorded under capitalized leases.
The Company capitalized coffee brewing equipment (included in machinery and equipment) in the amounts of $9.3$8.4 million and $13.9$10.7 million in fiscal 20132016 and 2012,2015, respectively. Depreciation expense related to the capitalized coffee brewing equipment reported as cost of goods sold was $12.8$9.8 million,, $12.2 $10.4 million and $9.6$10.9 million in fiscal 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, respectively. Depreciation and amortization expense includes amortization expense for assets recorded under capitalized leases.
The Company may incur certain other non-cash asset impairment costs in connection with the Corporate Relocation Plan.
Maintenance and repairs to property, plant and equipment charged to expense for the years ended June 30, 2013, 20122016, 2015, and 20112014 were $7.6$7.7 million,, $7.9 $8.2 million and $10.3$8.7 million,, respectively. 

64


Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)


Note 10.13. Goodwill and Intangible Assets
The following is a summary of changes in the carrying value of goodwill:
(In thousands)
Balance at June 30, 2014 $
Additions—RLC acquisition 272
Balance at June 30, 2015 $272
Additions 
Balance at June 30, 2016 $272
The following is a summary of the Company’s amortized and unamortized intangible assets other than goodwill, along with amortization expense on these intangible assets for the past threetwo fiscal years and estimated aggregateyears.
  June 30, 2016 June 30, 2015
(In thousands) 
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
Amortized intangible assets:        
Customer relationships $10,953
 $(10,373) $10,953
 $(10,179)
Covenant not to compete 20
 (10) 20
 (3)
Total amortized intangible assets $10,973
 $(10,383) $10,973
 $(10,182)
Unamortized intangible assets:        
Tradenames with indefinite lives $3,640
 $
 $3,640
 $
Trademarks with indefinite lives 1,988
 
 1,988
 
Total unamortized intangible assets $5,628
 $
 $5,628
 $
     Total intangible assets $16,601
 $(10,383) $16,601
 $(10,182)

Aggregate amortization expense for each of the next fivepast three fiscal years:
  June 30, 2013 June 30, 2012
  
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
  (In thousands)
Amortized intangible assets:        
Customer relationships $10,083
 $(9,434) $10,083
 $(8,188)
Total amortized intangible assets $10,083
 $(9,434) $10,083
 $(8,188)
Unamortized intangible assets:        
Tradenames with indefinite lives $3,640
 $
 $3,640
 $
Trademarks with indefinite lives 1,988
 
 2,080
 
Total unamortized intangible assets $5,628
 $
 $5,720
 $
Total intangible assets $15,711
 $(9,434) $15,803
 $(8,188)
         
Aggregate amortization expense for the past three fiscal years:      
For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013       $1,246
For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012       $1,439
For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011       $2,948
         
Estimated amortization expense for each of the next five fiscal years:    
For the fiscal year ending June 30, 2014       $649
         
Remaining weighted average amortization periods for intangible assets with finite lives are as follows:      
Customer relationships (years)       0.8

Summary of changes in the carrying value of goodwill:
Balance at June 30, 2011 $5,310
Reclassification (165)
Impairment loss (5,145)
Balance at June 30, 2012 $
(In thousands):
  
For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016 $200
For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015 $99
For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014 $649
Estimated amortization expense for the next three fiscal years:
(In thousands):  
For the fiscal year ending June 30, 2017 $200
For the fiscal year ending June 30, 2018 $198
For the fiscal year ending June 30, 2019 $193

Remaining weighted average amortization periods for intangible assets with finite lives are as follows:
Customer relationships (years)3.0
Covenant not to compete (years)1.5


Note 11.14. Employee Benefit Plans
The Company provides pensionbenefit plans for most full time employees.full-time employees, including 401(k), health and other welfare benefit plans and, in certain circumstances, pension benefits. Generally the plans provide benefits based on years of service and/or a

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)


combination of years of service and earnings. TheIn addition, the Company contributes to two multiemployer defined benefit pension plans, one multiemployer defined contribution pension plan and ten multiemployer defined contribution plans other than pension plans that provide medical, vision, dental and disability benefits for active, union-represented employees subject to collective bargaining agreements. In addition, the Company sponsors a postretirement defined benefit plan that covers qualified non-union retirees and certain qualified union retirees and provides retiree medical coverage and, depending on the age of the retiree, dental and vision coverage. The Company also provides a postretirement death benefit to certain of its employees and retirees.
The Company is required to recognize the funded status of a benefit plan in its consolidated balance sheet.sheets. The Company is also required to recognize in OCIother comprehensive income (loss) (“OCI”) certain gains and losses that arise during the period but are deferred under pension accounting rules.

65

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

Single Employer Pension Plans
The Company has a defined benefit pension plan, the Farmer Bros. Co. Pension Plan for Salaried Employees Pension Plan (the “Farmer Bros. Plan”), for the majority of itsCompany employees hired prior to January 1, 2010, who are not covered under a collective bargaining agreement. The Company amended the Farmer Bros. Plan, freezing the benefit for all participants effective June 30, 2011. After the plan freeze, participants do not accrue any benefits under the plan,Farmer Bros. Plan, and new hires are not eligible to participate in the plan. As a result, the Company recorded a pension curtailment expense of $1.5 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011 for the Farmer Bros. Plan. As all plan participants became inactive following this pension curtailment, net (gain) loss is now amortized based on the remaining life expectancy of these participants instead of the remaining service period of these participants.
The Company also has two defined benefit pension plans for certain hourly employees covered under collective bargaining agreements (the “Brewmatic Plan” and the “Hourly Employees' Plan”). In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013,2015, the Company actuarially determined that it would shut down its equipment refurbishment operations in Los Angeles, California and move themno adjustments were required to its Oklahoma City distribution center effective August 30, 2013. Duebe made to this shut down, all hourly employees responsiblefiscal 2015 net periodic benefit cost for these operations in Los Angeles were terminated and theirthe defined benefit pension benefits in the Brewmatic Plan were frozen effective August 30, 2013. Asplans as a result the Company recorded a pension curtailment expense of$34,000 in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013 which is included in "Selling expenses" in the Company's consolidated statement of operations for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013 and in "Accrued pension liabilities" on the Company's consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2013.Corporate Relocation Plan.
.


66

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)


Obligations and Funded Status 
 
Farmer Bros. Plan
June 30,
 
Brewmatic Plan
June 30,
 
Hourly Employees’ Plan
June 30,
 
Farmer Bros. Plan
June 30,
 
Brewmatic Plan
June 30,
 
Hourly Employees’ Plan
June 30,
 2013 2012 2013 2012 2013 2012
 (In thousands) (In thousands) (In thousands)
($ in thousands) 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015
Change in projected benefit obligation                        
Benefit obligation at the beginning of the year $124,828
 $107,071
 $4,022
 $3,662
 $1,520
 $1,055
 $136,962
 $133,136
 $4,064
 $3,991
 $3,145
 $2,619
Service cost 
 
 59
 39
 418
 456
 
 
 
 
 389
 386
Interest cost 5,550
 5,846
 176
 197
 69
 59
 5,875
 5,393
 172
 160
 137
 108
Plan participant contributions 
 81
 
 
 
 
Actuarial (gain) loss 1,333
 17,066
 (24) 416
 56
 (38)
Actuarial loss 15,999
 4,596
 682
 188
 687
 56
Benefits paid (5,506) (5,236) (287) (292) (7) (12) (6,511) (6,163) (344) (275) (29) (24)
Effect of curtailment 
 
 
 
 
 
Projected benefit obligation at the end of the year $126,205
 $124,828
 $3,946
 $4,022
 $2,056
 $1,520
 $152,325
 $136,962
 $4,574
 $4,064
 $4,329
 $3,145
Change in plan assets                        
Fair value of plan assets at the beginning of the year $82,110
 $80,448
 $2,718
 $2,871
 $1,013
 $421
 94,815
 $98,426
 $3,291
 $3,435
 $2,104
 $1,629
Actual return on plan assets 10,145
 246
 322
 (25) 125
 (4) 1,556
 1,731
 42
 66
 85
 10
Employer contributions 1,348
 6,571
 310
 164
 117
 608
 1,341
 821
 
 65
 287
 489
Plan participant contributions 
 81
 
 
 
 
Benefits paid (5,506) (5,236) (287) (292) (7) (12) (6,511) (6,163) (344) (275) (29) (24)
Fair value of plan assets at the end of the year $88,097
 $82,110
 $3,063
 $2,718
 $1,248
 $1,013
 $91,201
 $94,815
 $2,989
 $3,291
 $2,447
 $2,104
Funded status at end of year (underfunded) overfunded $(38,108) $(42,718) $(883) $(1,304) $(808) $(507) (61,124) $(42,147) (1,585) $(773) $(1,882) $(1,041)
Amounts recognized in consolidated balance sheet            
Non-current assets $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
Current liabilities 
 
 
 
 
 
Amounts recognized in consolidated balance sheets            
Non-current liabilities (38,108) (42,718) (883) (1,304) (808) (507) (61,124) (42,147) (1,585) (773) (1,882) (1,041)
Total $(38,108) $(42,718) $(883) $(1,304) $(808) $(507) $(61,124) $(42,147) $(1,585) $(773) $(1,882) $(1,041)
Amounts recognized in consolidated balance sheet            
Total net (gain) loss $44,841
 $48,720
 $1,878
 $2,154
 $108
 $90
Transition (asset) obligation 
 
 
 
 
 
Prior service cost (credit) 
 
 
 53
 
 
Amounts recognized in consolidated statements of operations            
Net loss 70,246
 $50,743
 2,756
 $1,965
 988
 $237
Total accumulated OCI (not adjusted for applicable tax) $44,841
 $48,720
 $1,878
 $2,207
 $108
 $90
 $70,246
 $50,743
 $2,756
 $1,965
 $988
 $237
Weighted average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations                        
Discount rate 4.50% 4.55% 4.50% 4.55% 4.50% 4.55% 3.55% 4.40% 3.55% 4.40% 3.55% 4.40%
Rate of compensation increase N/A
 N/A
 N/A
 N/A
 N/A
 N/A
 N/A
 N/A
 N/A
 N/A
 N/A
 N/A
 

67

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)


Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost and
Other Changes Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) (OCI) 

 
Farmer Bros. Plan
June 30,
 
Brewmatic Plan
June 30,
 
Hourly Employees’ Plan
June 30,
 
Farmer Bros. Plan
June 30,
 
Brewmatic Plan
June 30,
 
Hourly Employees’ Plan
June 30,
 2013 2012 2013 2012 2013 2012
 (In thousands) (In thousands) (In thousands)
($ in thousands) 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015
Components of net periodic benefit cost                        
Service cost $
 $
 $59
 $39
 $418
 $456
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $389
 $386
Interest cost 5,550
 5,846
 176
 197
 69
 59
 5,875
 5,393
 172
 160
 137
 108
Expected return on plan assets (6,355) (6,569) (196) (213) (87) (28) (6,470) (6,938) (219) (234) (149) (119)
Amortization of net (gain) loss 1,422
 570
 126
 87
 
 
Amortization of prior service cost (credit) 
 
 19
 18
 
 
Amount recognized due to special event (curtailment) 
 
 34
 
 
 
Net periodic benefit cost $617
 $(153) $218
 $128
 $400
 $487
Amortization of net loss 1,411
 1,153
 68
 57
 
 
Net periodic benefit cost (credit) $816
 $(392) $21
 $(17) $377
 $375
Other changes recognized in OCI                        
Net (gain) loss $(2,456) $23,389
 $(150) $654
 $18
 $(6)
Prior service cost (credit) 
 
 
 
 
 
Amortization of net gain (loss) (1,422) (570) (126) (87) 
 
Amortization of transition asset (obligation) 
 
 
 
 
 
Amortization of prior service (cost) credit 
 
 (19) (18) 
 
Amount recognized due to special event (curtailment) 
 
 (34) 
 
 
Net loss $20,913
 $9,803
 $859
 $356
 $750
 $165
Amortization of net loss (1,411) (1,153) (68) (57) 
 
Total recognized in OCI $(3,878) $22,819
 $(329) $549
 $18
 $(6) $19,502
 $8,650
 $791
 $299
 $750
 $165
Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and OCI $(3,261) $22,666
 $(111) $677
 $418
 $481
 $20,318
 $8,258
 $812
 $282
 $1,127
 $540
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost                        
Discount rate 4.55% 5.60% 4.55% 5.60% 4.55% 5.60% 4.40% 4.15% 4.40% 4.15% 4.40% 4.15%
Expected long-term return on plan assets 8.00% 8.25% 8.00% 8.25% 8.00% 8.25% 7.50% 7.50% 7.50% 7.50% 7.50% 7.50%
Rate of compensation increase N/A
 N/A
 N/A
 N/A
 N/A
 3.0% N/A
 N/A
 N/A
 N/A
 N/A
 N/A
Basis Used to Determine Expected Long-term Return on Plan Assets
Historical and future projected returns of multiple asset classes were analyzed to develop a risk-free real rate ofThe expected long-term return and risk premiums for each asset class. The overall rate for each asset classon plan assets assumption was developed by combiningas a long-term inflation component, the risk-free real rate of return, and the associated risk premium. A weighted average rate was developed based on those overall rates and the target asset allocationsallocation of the plans.

68

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notesplan and the Long-Term Capital Market Assumptions (CMA) 2014. The capital market assumptions were developed with a primary focus on forward-looking valuation models and market indicators. The key fundamental economic inputs for these models are future inflation, economic growth, and interest rate environment. Due to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
the long-term nature of the pension obligations, the investment horizon for the CMA 2014 is 20 to 30 years. In addition to forward-looking models, historical analysis of market data and trends was reflected, as well as the outlook of recognized economists, organizations and consensus CMA from other credible studies.

Description of Investment Policy
The Company’s investment strategy is to build an efficient, well-diversified portfolio based on a long-term, strategic outlook of the investment markets. The investment markets outlook utilizes both the historical-based and forward-looking return forecasts to establish future return expectations for various asset classes. These return expectations are used to develop a core asset allocation based on the specific needs of each plan. The core asset allocation utilizes investment portfolios of various asset classes and multiple investment managers in order to maximize the plan’s return while providing multiple layers of diversification to help minimize risk.

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)


Additional Disclosures
 
Farmer Bros. Plan
June 30,
 
Brewmatic Plan
June 30,
 
Hourly Employees’ Plan
June 30,
 
Farmer Bros. Plan
June 30,
 
Brewmatic Plan
June 30,
 
Hourly Employees’ Plan
June 30,
 2013 2012 2013 2012 2013 2012
 ($ In thousands) ($ In thousands) ($ In thousands)
($ in thousands) 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015
Comparison of obligations to plan assets                        
Projected benefit obligation $126,205
 $124,828
 $3,946
 $4,022
 $2,056
 $1,520
 $152,325
 $136,962
 $4,574
 $4,064
 $4,329
 $3,145
Accumulated benefit obligation $126,205
 $124,828
 $3,946
 $4,022
 $2,056
 $1,520
 $152,325
 $136,962
 $4,574
 $4,064
 $4,329
 $3,145
Fair value of plan assets at measurement date $88,097
 $82,110
 $3,063
 $2,718
 $1,248
 $1,013
 $91,201
 $94,815
 $2,989
 $3,291
 $2,447
 $2,104
Plan assets by category                        
Equity securities $58,681
 $53,396
 $2,059
 $1,767
 $811
 $686
 $58,094
 $47,340
 $1,909
 $1,638
 $1,542
 $1,050
Debt securities 24,822
 24,610
 843
 815
 375
 261
 27,586
 37,789
 899
 1,322
 758
 839
Real estate 4,594
 4,104
 161
 136
 62
 66
 5,521
 9,686
 181
 331
 147
 215
Total $88,097
 $82,110
 $3,063
 $2,718
 $1,248
 $1,013
 $91,201
 $94,815
 $2,989
 $3,291
 $2,447
 $2,104
Plan assets by category                        
Equity securities 67% 65% 67% 65% 65% 68% 64% 50% 64% 50% 63% 50%
Debt securities 28% 30% 28% 30% 30% 26% 30% 40% 30% 40% 31% 40%
Real estate 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 6% 6% 10% 6% 10% 6% 10%
Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100.0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Fair values of plan assets were as follows:
 
 June 30, 2013 June 30, 2016
(In thousands) Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Farmer Bros. Plan $88,097
 $
 $88,097
 $
 $91,201
 $
 $91,201
 $
Brewmatic Plan $3,063
 $
 $3,063
 $
 $2,989
 $
 $2,989
 $
Hourly Employees’ Plan $1,248
 $
 $1,248
 $
 $2,447
 $
 $2,447
 $
 
 June 30, 2012 June 30, 2015
(In thousands) Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Farmer Bros. Plan $82,110
 $
 $78,006
 $4,104
 $94,815
 $
 $94,815
 $
Brewmatic Plan $2,718
 $
 $2,582
 $136
 $3,291
 $
 $3,291
 $
Hourly Employees’ Plan $1,013
 $
 $947
 $66
 $2,104
 $
 $2,104
 $

As of June 30, 2013 and 2012,2016, approximately 100% and 95%, respectively,6% of the assets inof each of the Farmer Bros. Plan, the Brewmatic Plan and the Hourly Employees’ Plan were invested in pooled separate accounts ("PSA's")which did not have publicly quoted prices. The PSA's invest in publicly traded mutual funds. The fair values of the mutual funds were publicly quoted pricing input (Level 1) and were used to determine the net asset value of the PSA's. Therefore, these assets have Level 2 pricing inputs.

69

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

As of June 30, 2013 and 2012, approximately 5% of the assets in each of the Farmer Bros. Plan, the Brewmatic Plan and the Hourly Employees’ Plan were invested in PSA's which invested mainly in commercial real estate and includeincluded mortgage loans which arewere backed by the associated properties. These underlying real estate investments had certain temporary restrictions that prevented them from beingare able to redeem their investmentbe redeemed at net asset value per share ("NAV"), and therefore, were considered to have unobservable Level 3 pricing inputs. The fair value of the underlying real estate was estimated using discounted cash flow valuation models that utilize public real estate market data inputs such as transaction prices, market rents, vacancy levels, leasing absorption, market capitalization rates and discount rates. In addition, each property was appraised annually by an independent appraiser. As of June 30, 2013, these PSA's wereare considered Level 2 assets since the temporary restrictions that prevented them from being able to redeem their investment at NAV which disqualified them for Level 2 asset categorization were removed. Accordingly, as of June 30, 2013, none of the assets in the Farmer Bros. Plan, the Brewmatic Plan and the Hourly Employees’ Plan were categorized as Level 3. The amounts and types of investments within plan assets did not change significantly from June 30, 2012.
The following is a reconciliation of asset balances with Level 3 input pricing:
  
Beginning
Balance
 Total Gains Settlements Transfers 
Ending 
Balance
June 30, 2013 (In thousands)
Farmer Bros. Plan $4,104
 $
 $
 $(4,104) $
Brewmatic Plan $136
 $
 $
 $(136) $
Hourly Employees’ Plan $66
 $
 $
 $(66) $

  
Beginning
Balance
 Total Gains Settlements 
Ending
 Balance
 
Unrealized
Gains
June 30, 2012 (In thousands)
Farmer Bros. Plan $4,711
 $561
 $(1,168) $4,104
 $561
Brewmatic Plan $167
 $19
 $(50) $136
 $19
Hourly Employees’ Plan $25
 $5
 $36
 $66
 $5
assets.
The following is the target asset allocation for the Company's single employer pension plans for fiscal 2014:
Target Plan Asset Allocation for plans—Farmer Bros. Plan, Brewmatic Plan and Hourly Employees' PlanPlan—for fiscal 2017:
 Fiscal 20142017
U.S. large cap equity securities35.842.8%
U.S. small cap equity securities9.25.2%
International equity securities15.016.0%
Debt securities30.0%
Real estate10.06.0%
Total100.0%


Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)


Estimated Amounts in OCI Expected To Be Recognized
In fiscal 2014,2017, the Company expects to recognize$0.3 million as a component of net periodic benefit cost $1.1 million for the Farmer Bros. Plan, $16,000$71,000 for the Brewmatic Plan, and $0.4$0.5 million for the Hourly Employees’ Plan.
Estimated Future Contributions and Refunds
In fiscal 2014,2017, the Company expects to contribute $1.0$2.0 million to the Farmer Bros. Plan, $0.1$0.1 million to the Brewmatic Plan, and $0.2$0.3 million to the Hourly Employees’ Plan. The Company is not aware of any refunds expected from postretirementsingle employer pension plans.

70

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

Estimated Future Benefit Payments
The following benefit payments are expected to be paid over the next 10 fiscal years:
Estimated future benefit payments
Year ending Farmer Bros. Plan Brewmatic Plan 
Hourly Employees’
Plan
  (In thousands)
June 30, 2014 $5,970
 $290
 $34
June 30, 2015 $6,110
 $290
 $47
June 30, 2016 $6,260
 $280
 $64
June 30, 2017 $6,520
 $280
 $81
June 30, 2018 $6,740
 $290
 $100
June 30, 2019 to June 30, 2023 $37,640
 $1,380
 $810
(In thousands) Farmer Bros. Plan Brewmatic Plan 
Hourly Employees’
Plan
Year Ending:  
June 30, 2017 $7,310
 $320
 $81
June 30, 2018 $7,520
 $310
 $110
June 30, 2019 $7,760
 $310
 $120
June 30, 2020 $8,040
 $300
 $140
June 30, 2021 $8,250
 $290
 $170
June 30, 2022 to June 30, 2026 $42,770
 $1,340
 $1,170
These amounts are based on current data and assumptions and reflect expected future service, as appropriate.

Multiemployer Pension Plans
The Company participates in atwo multiemployer defined benefit pension plan, the Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Plan (“WCTPP”),plans that isare union sponsored and collectively bargained for the benefit of certain employees subject to collective bargaining agreements.agreements, of which the Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Plan (“WCTPP”) is individually significant. The Company makes contributions to WCTPPthese plans generally based on the number of hours worked by the participants in accordance with the provisions of negotiated labor contracts.
The risks of participating in multiemployer pension plans are different from single-employer plans in that: (i) assets contributed to a multiemployer plan by one employer may be used to provide benefits to employees of other participating employers; (ii) if a participating employer stops contributing to the plan, the unfunded obligations of the plan may be borne by the remaining participating employers; and (iii) if the Company stops participating in the multiemployer plan, the Company may be required to pay the plan an amount based on the underfunded status of the plan, referred to as a withdrawal liability.
The Company's participation in WCTPP is outlined in the table below. The Pension Protection Act (“PPA”) Zone Status available in the Company's fiscal year 20132016 and fiscal year 20122015 is for the plan's year ended December 31, 20122015 and December 31, 2011,2014, respectively. The zone status is based on information obtained from WCTPP and is certified by WCTPP's actuary. Among other factors, plans in the green zone are generally more than 80% funded. Based on WCTPP's annual report on Form 5500, WCTPP was 90.0%91.7% and 90.3%91.9% funded for its plan year beginning January 1, 20132015 and 2012,2014, respectively. The “FIP/RP Status Pending/Implemented” column indicates if a funding improvement plan (“FIP”) or a rehabilitation plan (“RP”) is either pending or has been implemented.
 Pension Plan 
Employer
Identification
Number
 
Pension
Plan 
Number
 PPA Zone Status 
FIP/RP
Status 
Pending/
Implemented
 
Surcharge
Imposed 
 
Expiration Date
of Collective
Bargaining
Agreements
 
 
July 1,
2012
2015
 
July 1,
20112014
 
 
 Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Plan 91-6145047 001 Green Green No No January 2014 to June 201731, 2020

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)



Based upon the most recent information available from the trustees managing WCTPP, the Company's share of the unfunded vested benefit liability for the plan was estimated to be approximately $11.6$9.1 million if the withdrawal had occurred in calendar year 2012.2015. These estimates were calculated by the trustees managing WCTPP. Although the Company believes the most recent plan data available from WCTPP was used in computing this 20122015 estimate, the actual withdrawal liability amount is subject to change based on, among other things, the plan's investment returns and benefit levels, interest rates, financial difficulty of other participating employers in the plan such as bankruptcy, and continued participation by the Company and other employers in the plan, each of which could impact the ultimate withdrawal liability.
If withdrawal liability were to be triggered, the withdrawal liability assessment can be paid in a lump sum or on a monthly basis. The amount of the monthly payment is determined as follows: Average number of hours reported to the pension plan trust during the three consecutive years with highest number of hours in the 10-year10-year period prior to the withdrawal is multiplied by the highest hourly contribution rate during the 10-year period ending with the plan year in which the withdrawal occurred to determine the amount of withdrawal liability that

71

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

has to be paid annually. The annual amount is divided by 12 to arrive at the monthly payment due. If monthly payments are elected, interest is assessed on the unpaid balance after 12 months at the rate of 7% per annum.

Effective October 2011, the Company withdrew from the defined benefit pension plan, United Teamsters Pension Fund, and replaced it with the defined contribution pension plan, “United Teamsters Annuity Fund” (“Annuity Fund”), for its employees covered by a certain collective bargaining agreement with a term expiring in 2014. The Company incurred no withdrawal liability related to the withdrawal from the United Teamsters Pension Fund. The Company's contributions to the Annuity Fund are based on the number of compensable hours worked by the Company's employees who participate in the Annuity Fund.
In fiscal 2012, the Company withdrew from the Labor ManagementLocal 807 Labor-Management Pension Fund (“Pension Fund”) and recorded a charge of $4.3$4.3 million associated with withdrawal from this plan, representing the present value of the estimated withdrawal liability expected to be paid in quarterly installments of $0.1$0.1 million over 80 quarters. Installment payments will commence onceOn November 18, 2014, the final determinationPension Fund sent the Company a notice of assessment of withdrawal liability in the amount of $4.4 million, which the Pension Fund adjusted to $4.9 million on January 5, 2015. The Company is in the process of negotiating a reduced liability amount. The Company has commenced quarterly installment payments to the Pension Fund of $91,000 pending the final settlement of the liability. The total estimated withdrawal liability of $3.8 million and $4.3 million, respectively, is established, which determination may take up to 24 months from the date of withdrawal from the pension plan. Upon withdrawal, the employees covered under this multiemployer pension plan were included in the Company's 401(k) plan (the “401(k) Plan”). The $4.3 million estimated withdrawal charge is includedreflected in the Company's consolidated statement of operations for the fiscal year endedbalance sheets at June 30, 2012 as “Pension withdrawal expense,”2016 and June 30, 2015, with the short-term and long-term portions reflected in current and long-term liabilities, respectively, on the Company's consolidated balance sheets at June 30, 2012 and June 30, 2013. In the fourth quarter ended June 30, 2012, therespectively.
The Company paid a final settlement of $0.3 million towards withdrawal from the Central States Pension Fund that was part of the DSD Coffee Business acquisition and recorded the charge as "Pension withdrawal expense."
Inmay incur certain pension-related costs in connection with the intended shut down of the Company's equipment refurbishment operations in Los Angeles, California and termination of all hourly employees responsible for such operations effective as of August 30, 2013, in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013, the Company recorded a pension curtailment expense of $34,000 since the pension benefits of all such employees in the Brewmatic Plan are expected to be frozen as of August 30, 2013.
Corporate Relocation Plan. Future collective bargaining negotiations may result in the Company withdrawing from the remaining multiemployer pension plans in which it participates and, if successful, the Company may incur a withdrawal liability, the amount of which could be material to the Company's results of operations and cash flows.
Company contributions to the multiemployer pension plans:
(In thousands) WCTPP(1)(2)(3) All other Plans(4)
Year Ended:    
June 30, 2013 $3,064
 $37
June 30, 2012 $3,048
 $113
June 30, 2011 $2,929
 $254
(In thousands) WCTPP(1)(2)(3) All Other Plans(4)
Year Ended:    
June 30, 2016 $2,587
 $39
June 30, 2015 $3,593
 $41
June 30, 2014 $3,153
 $34
____________
(1)Individually significant plan.
(2)
Less than 5% of total contribution to WCTPP based on WCTPP's most recent annual report on Form 5500 for the calendar year ended December 31, 2012.2015.
(3)
The Company guarantees that one hundred seventy-three (173) hours will be contributed upon for all employees who are compensated for all available straight time hours for each calendar month. An additional 6.5% of the basic contribution must be paid for PEER or the Program for Enhanced Early Retirement.
(4)Includes plansone plan that areis not individually significant.
ForThe Company's contribution to multiemployer plans decreased in fiscal 2016 as compared to fiscal 2015 and 2014, as a result of reduction in employees due to the fiscal year ending June 30, 2014, theCorporate Relocation Plan. The Company expects to make $3.4contribute an aggregate of $3.3 million in contributions to towards multiemployer pension plans.plans in fiscal 2017.

Multiemployer Plans Other Than Pension Plans

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)


The Company participates in eightten multiemployer defined contribution multiemployer plans other than pension plans that provide medical, vision, dental and disability benefits for active, union-represented employees subject to collective bargaining agreements. The plans are subject to the provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, and provide that participating employers make monthly contributions to the plans in an amount as specified in the collective bargaining agreements. Also, the plans provide that participants make self-payments to the plans, the amounts of which are negotiated through the collective bargaining process. The Company's participation in these plans is governed by the collective bargaining

72

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

agreements which expire on or before June 30, 2017.January 31, 2020. The Company's aggregate contributions to multiemployer plans other than pension plans in the fiscal years ended June 30, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 20112014 were $5.8$6.3 million,, $5.8 $6.9 million and $5.4$6.6 million,, respectively. The Company expects to contribute $6.4an aggregate of $6.5 million towards multiemployer plans other than pension plans in fiscal 2014.2017.
401(k) Plan
The Company's 401(k) Plan is available to all eligible employees who have worked more than 1,000 hours during a calendar year and were employed at the end of the calendar year. Participants in the 401(k) Plan may choose to contribute a percentage of their annual pay subject to the maximum contribution allowed by the Internal Revenue Service. The Company's matching contribution is discretionary, based on approval by the Company's Board of Directors. For the calendar years 2011, 20122016, 2015 and 2013,2014, the Company's Board of Directors approved a Company matching contribution of 50% of an employee's annual contribution to the 401(k) Plan, up to 6% of the employee's eligible income. The matching contributions (and any earnings thereon) vest at the rate of 20% for each of the participant's first 5 years of vesting service, so that a participant is fully vested in his or her matching contribution account after 5 years of vesting service.service, subject to accelerated vesting under certain circumstances in connection with the Corporate Relocation Plan due to the closure of the Company’s Torrance facility or a reduction-in-force at another Company facility designated by the Administrative Committee of the Farmer Bros. Co. Qualified Employee Retirement Plans. A participant is automatically vested in the event of death, disability or attainment of age 65 while employed by the Company. Employees are 100% vested in their contributions. For employees subject to a collective bargaining agreement, the match is only available if so provided in the labor agreement.
The Company recorded matching contributions of $1.2$1.6 million,, $1.4 $1.4 million and $0.1$1.3 million in operating expenses for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, respectively.
Postretirement Benefits
The Company sponsors a postretirement defined benefit plan that covers qualified non-union retirees and certain qualified union retirees.retirees (“Retiree Medical Plan”). The plan provides medical, dental and vision coverage for retirees under age 65 and medical coverage only for retirees age 65 and above. Under this postretirement plan, the Company’s contributions toward premiums for retiree medical, dental and vision coverage for participants and dependents are scaled based on length of service, with greater Company contributions for retirees with greater length of service, but subject to a maximum monthly Company contribution. The Company's retiree medical, dental and vision plan is unfunded, and its liability was calculated using an assumed discount rate of 4.8%3.7% at June 30, 2013.2016. The Company projects an initial medical trend rate of 7.0%9.0% in fiscal 2013, and 6.5% in fiscal 2014,2017, ultimately reducing to 5.0%4.5% in 410 years.
The Company also provides a postretirement death benefit (“Death Benefit”) to certain of its employees and retirees, subject, in the case of current employees, to continued employment with the Company until retirement and certain other conditions related to the manner of employment termination and manner of death. The Company records the actuarially determined liability for the present value of the postretirement death benefit. The Company has purchased life insurance policies to fund the postretirement death benefit wherein the Company owns the policy but the postretirement death benefit is paid to the employee's or retiree's beneficiary. The Company records an asset for the fair value of the life insurance policies which equates to the cash surrender value of the policies. In fiscal 2016, the Company actuarially determined that no postretirement benefit costs related to the Corporate Relocation Plan were required to be recognized.

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)


Retiree Medical Plan and Death Benefit
The following table shows the components of net periodic postretirement benefit cost for the Retiree Medical Plan and Death Benefit for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011.2014. Net periodic postretirement benefit cost for fiscal 20132016 was based on employee census information as of July 1, 20122015 and asset information as of June 30, 20132016..
 
  Year Ended June 30,
  2013 2012 2011
    As Restated As Restated
Components of Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost: (In thousands)
Service cost $1,972
 $1,817
 $1,617
Interest cost 969
 1,100
 1,496
Expected return on plan assets 
 
 
Amortization of net gain 17
 (164) (712)
Amortization of unrecognized transition (asset) obligation 
 
 
Amortization of prior service cost (credit) (1,757) (1,757) (358)
Net periodic postretirement benefit cost $1,201
 $996
 $2,043
  Year Ended June 30,
(In thousands) 2016 2015 2014
Components of Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost (credit):      
Service cost $1,388
 $1,195
 $936
Interest cost 1,194
 943
 810
Amortization of net gains (196) (500) (880)
Amortization of prior service credit (1,757) (1,757) (1,757)
Net periodic postretirement benefit cost (credit) $629
 $(119) $(891)
The difference between the assets and the Accumulated Postretirement Benefit Obligation (APBO) at the adoption of ASC 715-60 was established as a transition (asset) obligation and is amortized over the average expected future service for

73

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

active employees as measured at the date of adoption. Any plan amendments that retroactively increase benefits create prior service cost. The increase in the APBO due to any plan amendment is established as a base and amortized over the average remaining years of service to the full eligibility date of active participants who are not yet fully eligible for benefits at the plan amendment date. Gains and losses due to experience different than that assumed or from changes in actuarial assumptions are not immediately recognized. The tables below show the remaining bases for the transition (asset) obligation, prior service cost (credit), and the calculation of the amortizable gain or loss. 
Amortization Schedule  
Transition (Asset) Obligation: The transition (asset) obligations have been fully amortized.
Prior service cost (credit) (dollars($ in thousands): 
Date Established 
Balance at
July 1, 2012
 
Annual
Amortization
 Years Remaining Curtailment 
Balance at
June 30, 2013
 
Balance at
July 1, 2015
 
Annual
Amortization
  Years Remaining Curtailment 
Balance at
June 30, 2016
January 1, 2008 $(1,653) $230
 7.2 
 $(1,423) $(962) $230
  3.2 
 $(732)
July 1, 2012 (17,581) 1,527
 11.5 
 (16,054) (13,001) 1,526
 7.5 
 (11,475)
 $(19,234) $1,757
   $(17,477) $(13,963) $1,756
   $(12,207)

 
 Year Ended June 30, Year Ended June 30, Year Ended June 30,
 Retiree Medical Plan Death Benefit Retiree Medical Plan Death Benefit
 2013 2012 2013 2012
   As Restated   As Restated
Amortization of Net (Gain) Loss (dollars in thousands):        
($ in thousands) 2016 2015 2016 2015
Amortization of Net (Gain) Loss:    
Net (gain) loss as of July 1 $(12,087) $(3,941) $1,850
 $2,231
 $(8,710) $(3,655) $690
 $690
Asset (gains) losses not yet recognized in market related value of assets 
 
 
 
Net (gain) loss subject to amortization (12,087) (3,941) 1,850
 2,231
 (8,710) (3,655) 690
 690
Corridor (10% of greater of APBO or assets) 872
 1,527
 (798) (806) 1,724
 1,723
 (729) (729)
Net (gain) loss in excess of corridor $(11,215) $(2,414) $1,052
 $1,425
 $(6,986) $(1,932) $
 $
Amortization years 11.1
 11.9
 8.0
 8.8
 10.0
 10.8
 7.7
 8.7

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)


 The following tables provide a reconciliation of the benefit obligation and plan assets: 
 Year Ended June 30, Year Ended June 30,
 2013 2012
   As Restated
(In thousands) 2016 2015
Change in Benefit Obligation: (In thousands)    
Projected postretirement benefit obligation at beginning of year $23,325
 $19,957
 $24,522
 $20,889
Service cost 1,972
 1,817
 1,388
 1,195
Interest cost 969
 1,100
 1,194
 943
Participant contributions 729
 665
 795
 711
Amendments 
 
Actuarial (gains) losses (8,520) 1,419
Actuarial losses (4,259) 2,751
Benefits paid (1,774) (1,633) (1,773) (1,967)
Projected postretirement benefit obligation at end of year $16,701
 $23,325
 $21,867
 $24,522
 

74

  Year Ended June 30,
(In thousands) 2016 2015
Change in Plan Assets:    
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year $
 $
Employer contributions 978
 1,256
Participant contributions 795
 711
Benefits paid (1,773) (1,967)
Fair value of plan assets at end of year 
 
Projected postretirement benefit obligation at end of year $21,867
 $24,522
Funded status of plan $(21,867) $(24,522)
  June 30,
(In thousands) 2016 2015
Amounts Recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets Consist of:    
Non-current assets $
 $
Current liabilities (1,060) (1,051)
Non-current liabilities (20,807) (23,471)
Total $(21,867) $(24,522)
  Year Ended June 30,
(In thousands) 2016 2015
Amounts Recognized in Accumulated OCI Consist of:    
Net gain $(7,027) $(2,965)
Transition obligation (12,207) (13,963)
Total accumulated OCI $(19,234) $(16,928)
  Year Ended June 30,
(In thousands) 2016 2015
Other Changes in Plan Assets and Benefit Obligations Recognized in OCI:    
Unrecognized actuarial loss $(4,259) $2,751
Amortization of net loss 196
 500
Amortization of prior service cost 1,757
 1,757
Total recognized in OCI (2,306) 5,008
Net periodic benefit credit 629
 (119)
Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and OCI $(1,677) $4,889

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)


  Year Ended June 30,
  2013 2012
    As Restated
Change in Plan Assets: (In thousands)
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year $
 $
Actual return on assets 
 
Employer contributions 1,045
 968
Participant contributions 729
 665
Benefits paid (1,774) (1,633)
Fair value of plan assets at end of year 
 $
Funded status of plan $(16,701) $(23,325)
  June 30,
  2013 2012
    As Restated
Amounts Recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheet Consist of: (In thousands)
Non-current assets $
 $
Current liabilities (625) (799)
Non-current liabilities (16,076) (22,526)
Total $(16,701) $(23,325)
  Year Ended June 30,
  2013 2012
    As Restated
Amounts Recognized in Accumulated OCI Consist of: (In thousands)
Net gain $(10,131) $(1,594)
Transition obligation 
 
Prior service cost (credit) (17,604) (19,361)
Total accumulated OCI $(27,735) $(20,955)

  Year Ended June 30,
  2013 2012
    As Restated
Other Changes in Plan Assets and Benefit Obligations Recognized in OCI: (In thousands)
Unrecognized actuarial loss (gain) $(8,520) $1,419
Unrecognized transition (asset) obligation 
 
Unrecognized prior service cost 
 
Amortization of net loss (17) 164
Amortization of prior service cost 1,757
 1,757
Total recognized in OCI (6,780) 3,340
Net periodic benefit cost 1,201
 996
Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and OCI $(5,579) $4,336
The estimated net gain and prior service cost (credit)credit that will be amortized from accumulated OCI into net periodic benefit cost in fiscal 20142017 are $0.8$0.6 million and $1.8$1.8 million,, respectively. 

75

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

  
Estimated Future Benefit Payments (in thousands): 
Year ending 
June 30, 2014$640
June 30, 2015$762
June 30, 2016$836
June 30, 2017$913
June 30, 2018$1,034
June 30, 2019 to June 30, 2023$6,522
  
Expected Contributions (in thousands) 
June 30, 2014$640
(In thousands) 
Estimated Future Benefit Payments: 
Year Ending: 
June 30, 2017$1,080
June 30, 2018$1,102
June 30, 2019$1,143
June 30, 2020$1,176
June 30, 2021$1,210
June 30, 2022 to June 30, 2026$6,246
  
Expected Contributions: 
June 30, 2017$1,080
Sensitivity in Fiscal 20132017 Results
Assumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts reported for the health care plan. A one percentage point change in assumed health care cost trend rates would have the following effects in fiscal 20132017: (in thousands):
 
 1-Percentage Point 1-Percentage Point
 Increase Decrease
(In thousands) Increase Decrease
Effect on total of service and interest cost components $305
 $(271) $181
 $(154)
Effect on accumulated postretirement benefit obligation $1,230
 $(976) $1,664
 $(1,423)

Note 12.15. Bank Loan
On September 12, 2011, theThe Company entered into an Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement (the “Loan Agreement”maintains a $75.0 million senior secured revolving credit facility (“Revolving Facility”) among the Company and Coffee Bean International, Inc. (“CBI”), as Borrowers, certain of the Company’s other subsidiaries, as Guarantors, the Lenders party thereto, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (“Wells Fargo”), as Agent.
On January 9, 2012, the Loan Agreement was amended in connection with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“JPMorgan Chase”), becoming an additional Lender thereunder. On March 18, 2013,and SunTrust Bank (collectively, the Loan Agreement was amended further ("Amendment No. 2"“Lenders”) to amend the definition of "Maximum Credit" available thereunder to $75.0 million from $85.0 million. Pursuant to Amendment No. 2, Wells Fargo will provide a commitment of $53.0 million and JPMorgan Chase will provide a commitment of $22.0 million.
The Loan Agreement provides for a senior secured revolving credit facility of up to $75.0 million, with a lettersublimit on letters of credit sublimitand swingline loans of $20.0$30.0 million. and $15.0 million. respectively. The revolving credit facility provides for advances of 85% ofRevolving Facility includes an accordion feature whereby the Company may increase the Revolving Commitment by up to an additional $50.0 million, subject to certain conditions. Advances are based on the Company’s eligible accounts receivable, and 75% of eligible inventory, (subjectand the value of certain real property and trademarks, less required reserves. The commitment fee ranges from 0.25% to a $60.0 million inventory loan limit), as defined. The Loan Agreement provides for interest rates0.375% per annum based on modified Monthly Average Excess Availability levels with a range of PRIME + 0.25% to PRIME + 0.75% or Adjusted Eurodollar Rate + 2.0% to Adjusted Eurodollar Rate + 2.5%. The Loan Agreement has an amendment fee of 0.375% and an unused line fee of 0.25%.average revolver usage. Outstanding obligations under the Loan Agreement are collateralized by all of the Borrowers’Company’s assets, includingexcluding certain real property not included in the Company’sborrowing base, machinery and equipment (other than inventory), and the Company's preferred stock portfolio. Borrowings under the Revolving Facility bear interest based on average historical excess availability levels with a range of PRIME - 0.25% to PRIME + 0.50% or Adjusted LIBO Rate + 1.25% to Adjusted LIBO Rate + 2.00%. The Loan Agreement expires on March 2, 2015.
The Loan Agreement containsCompany is subject to a variety of affirmative and negative covenants of types customary in an asset-based lending facility, including thosefinancial covenants relating to reporting requirements,the maintenance of records, propertiesa fixed charge coverage ratio in certain circumstances, and corporate existence, compliance with laws, incurrencethe right of other indebtedness and liens, limitations on certain payments, including the paymentLenders to establish reserve requirements, which may reduce the amount of dividends and capital expenditures, and transactions and extraordinary corporate events.credit otherwise available to the Company. The Loan Agreement allows the Company is allowed to pay dividends, provided, among other things, certain liquidityexcess availability requirements are met, the aggregate amount of all such payments in any fiscal year shall not exceed $7.0 million ($1.75 million in any fiscal quarter), and no event of default exists or has occurred and is continuing as of the date of any such payment and after giving effect thereto. The Loan Agreement also contains financial covenants requiring the Borrowers to maintain minimum Excess Availability and Total Liquidity levels. The Loan Agreement allows the Lenders to establish reserve requirements, which may reduce the amount of credit otherwise available to the Company, to reflect events, conditions, or risks that would have a reasonable likelihood of adversely affecting the Lender’s collateral or the Company’s assets, including the Company’s green coffee inventory.

76

Farmer Bros. Co.Revolving Facility expires on March 2, 2020.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

Effective December 1, 2012, the Company entered into an interest rate swap transaction utilizing a notional amount of $10.0 million and a maturity date of March 1, 2015. The Company entered into the swap transaction to effectively fix the future interest rate during the applicable period on a portion of its borrowings under the revolving credit facility. The swap transaction is intended to manage the Company's interest rate risk related to its revolving credit facility and requires the Company to pay a fixed rate of 0.48% per annum in exchange for a variable interest rate based on 1-month USD LIBOR-BBA. As ofAt June 30, 2013, the variable interest rate based on 1-month USD LIBOR-BBA was 0.19%.
The Company has not designated its interest rate swap as an accounting hedge. The Company records the interest rate swap on its consolidated balance sheet at fair value with the changes in fair value recorded as gain or loss in "Other, net" in its consolidated statements of operations. In fiscal 2013, the Company recorded a loss of $25,000 for the change in fair value of its interest rate swap. No such gains or losses were recorded in fiscal 2012 (see Note 3).
On June 30, 2013,2016, the Company was eligible to borrow up to a total of $61.7$58.6 million under the credit facility. As of June 30, 2013, the CompanyRevolving Facility and had outstanding borrowings of $19.8$0.1 million,, including loan extension fees of $0.1 utilized $11.9 million, utilized $11.6 million of the letters of credit sublimit, and had excess availability under the credit facilityRevolving Facility of $30.3 million. In connection with entering into the interest rate swap agreement, the Company reclassified $10.0 million of its borrowings under the revolving credit facility as long-term because the Company intends to repay the borrowings in accordance with the termination date of the swap agreement which extends beyond one year.$46.6 million. At June 30, 2013,2016, the weighted average interest rate on the Company's outstanding borrowings under the credit facilityRevolving Facility was 1.37%.
As of June 30, 2013,1.64% and the Company was in compliance with all of the restrictive covenants under the credit facility. On October 3, 2013, the Company and Wells Fargo, as Agent, and the Lenders entered into a Letter Agreement regarding Waiver of Event of Default (the “Waiver Agreement”) pursuantRevolving Facility.

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to which Wells Fargo agreed to waive the event of default arising under the Loan Agreement as a result of the Company’s failure to furnish, in a timely manner, its audited consolidated financial statements and unaudited consolidating financial statements, and the accompanying notes thereto, together with the unqualified opinion of independent certified public accountants with respect to the audited consolidated financial statements, for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013; provided that the Company furnish to Agent such financial information by October 15, 2013. There can be no assurance that the Lenders will issue a waiver or grant an amendment to the covenants in future periods, if the Company required one.Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)


Note 13.16. Employee Stock Ownership Plan
The Company’s ESOP was established in 2000.2000. The plan is a leveraged ESOP in which the Company is the lender. The loans will beare repaid from the Company’s discretionary plan contributions over the original 15 year term with a variable rate of interest. The annual interest rate was 1.69%1.99% at June 30, 2013,2016, which is updated on a quarterly basis. 
  
As of and for the years ended
June 30,
  2013 2012 2011
Loan amount (in thousands) $20,836
 $25,637
 $30,437
Shares purchased 
 
 
  As of and for the years ended June 30,
  2016 2015 2014
Loan amount (in thousands) $6,434 $11,234 $16,035
Shares are held by the plan trustee for allocation among participants as the loan is repaid. The unencumbered shares are allocated to participants using a compensation-based formula. Subject to vesting requirements, allocated shares are owned by participants and shares are held by the plan trustee until the participant retires.
In fiscal 2011,Historically, the Company used $1.3 million of the dividends, if any, on ESOP shares to pay down the loans, and allocated to the ESOP participants shares equivalent to the fair market value of the dividends they would have received. No dividends were paid in fiscal 2013 and 2012. In fiscal 2011, the Company issued 1,040 shares of common stock to the ESOP to compensate for a shortfall in unallocated, uncommitted shares.
The Company reports compensation expense equal to the fair market value of shares committed to be released to employees in the period in which they are committed. The cost of shares purchased by the ESOP which have not been committed to be released2016, 2015 or allocated to participants are shown as a contra-equity account “Unearned ESOP Shares” and are excluded from earnings per share calculations.2014.
During the fiscal years ended June 30, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, the Company charged $2.1$3.4 million,, $1.5 $4.4 million, and $2.6$3.3 million, respectively, to compensation expense related to the ESOP. The decrease in ESOP expense in fiscal 2016 is primarily due to the reduction in the number of shares being allocated to participant accounts as a result of paying down the loan amount. The increase in ESOP expense in fiscal 2015 as compared to fiscal 2014 was due to the increase in the fair market value of the Company's shares which determines the ESOP expense recorded. The difference between cost and fair market value of committed to be

77

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

released shares, which was $0.1$36,000, $1.0 million, $0.1 and $0.3 million and $(1.4) million for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, respectively, is recorded as additional paid-in capital.
 June 30, June 30,
 2013 2012 2016 2015
Allocated shares 1,885,060
 1,763,742
 1,941,934
 1,970,117
Committed to be released shares 173,244
 185,538
 169,603
 172,398
Unallocated shares 738,355
 911,599
 220,925
 390,528
Total ESOP shares 2,796,659
 2,860,879
 2,332,462
 2,533,043
        
    
 (In thousands)
(In thousands)    
Fair value of ESOP shares $39,321
 $22,773
 $74,779
 $59,527
Note 14.17. Share-based Compensation
On August 23, 2007,Non-qualified stock options with time-based vesting (“NQOs”)
In fiscal 2016, the Company’s BoardCompany granted 21,595 shares issuable upon the exercise of Directors approved the Farmer Bros. Co. 2007 Omnibus Plan (the “Omnibus Plan”), which was approved by stockholders on December 6, 2007. On December 6, 2012, the stockholders approved an amendmentNQOs with a weighted average exercise price of $29.48 per share to increase the maximum number of shares of common stock available for issuanceeligible employees under the OmnibusAmended Equity Plan to 1,125,000 from 1,000,000, subject to adjustment as provided in the Omnibus Plan. Prior to adoption of the Omnibus Plan the Company had no share-based compensation plan. Awards issued under the Omnibus Plan may take the form of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, dividend equivalents, performance-based awards, stock payments, cash-based awards or other incentives payable in cash or shares of stock, or any combination thereof. Each award will be set forth in a separate agreement with the person receiving the award and will indicate the type, terms and conditions of the award.
The Company measures and recognizes compensation expense for all share-based payment awards made under the Omnibus Plan based on estimated fair values.
Stock Options
The Company estimates the fair value of share-based payment awards on the date of grant using an option-pricing model. The value of the portion of the award that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as expense over the requisite service period in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations.
Share-based compensation expense recognized during the period is based on the value of the portion of share-based payment awards that is ultimately expected to vest during the period. Compensation expense recognized for all stock option awards granted is recognized using the straight-line method over the vesting period. The options generallywhich vest ratably over a period of 3 years, however, fiscal 2012 grants included nonqualified stock option awards to executive officers with different vesting periods, in each case, subject to certain events of acceleration as provided in the applicable employment agreement or award agreement with the executive officer.three-year period.
The share-based compensation expense recognized in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2013, 2012 and 2011 is based on awards ultimately expected to vest. Currently, management estimates an annual forfeiture rate of 6.5% based on actual forfeiture experience from the inception of the Omnibus Plan. Forfeitures are estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates.
The Company uses the Black-Scholes option valuation model, which requires management to make certain assumptions for estimating the fair value of stock options at the date of the grant. The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions including the expected stock price volatility. Because the Company’s stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options, and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimates, in management’s opinion the existing models may not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of the Company’s stock options. Although the fair value of stock options is determined using an option valuation model that value may not be indicative of the fair value observed in a willing buyer/willing seller market transaction.

78

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

The followingFollowing are the weighted average assumptions used in the Black-Scholes valuation model:model for NQOs granted during the fiscal years ended June 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014
 Year Ended June 30, Year Ended June 30,
 2013 2012 2011 2016 2015 2014
Average fair value of options $5.69
 $4.42
 $7.05
Forfeiture rate 6.5% 6.5% 6.5%
Weighted average fair value of NQOs $12.63
 $10.38
 $9.17
Risk-free interest rate 0.9% 1.1% 2.7% 1.6% 1.5% 1.7%
Dividend yield % % 1.3% % % %
Average expected life 6 years
 6 years
 6 years
Average expected term 5.1 years
 5.1 years
 6 years
Expected stock price volatility 49.5% 52.5% 54.7% 47.1% 47.9% 50.4%
The Company’s assumption regarding expected stock price volatility is based on the historical volatility of the Company’s stock price. The risk-free interest rate is based on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues at the date of grant with a remaining term

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)


equal to the expected life of the stock options. The average expected lifeterm is based on historical weighted time outstanding and the expected weighted time outstanding calculated by assuming the settlement of outstanding awards at the midpoint between the vesting date and the end of the contractual term of the award. Currently, management estimates an annual forfeiture rate of 4.8% based on actual forfeiture experience. Forfeitures are estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates.
The following table summarizes stock optionNQO activity for the three most recent fiscal years:
Outstanding Stock Options: 
Number
of
Stock
Options
 
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price ($)
 
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value ($)
 
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Life
(Years)
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
(Dollars in thousands)
Outstanding at June 30, 2010 404,943
 20.17 6.25 5.8 
Granted 327,656
 14.95 7.05  
Cancelled/Forfeited (234,789) 19.21 6.97  
Outstanding at June 30, 2011 497,810
 17.19 6.44 5.7 61
Granted 356,834
 8.90 4.42  
Cancelled/Forfeited (187,409) 16.89 5.06  
Outstanding at June 30, 2012 667,235
 12.84 4.78 4.8 143
Outstanding NQOs: 
Number
of NQOs
 
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price ($)
 
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value ($)
 
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Life
(Years)
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
($ in thousands)
Outstanding at June 30, 2013 557,427
 12.81 5.44 5.1 1,620
Granted 192,892
 12.12 5.69 6.5 374
 1,927
 18.68 9.17 6.4 
Exercised (117,482) 10.24 5.23  336
 (112,964) 13.10 5.81  895
Cancelled/Forfeited (185,218) 13.83 5.92  
 (33,936) 16.63 6.13  
Outstanding at June 30, 2013 557,427
 12.81 5.44 5.1 1,620
Vested and exercisable, June 30, 2013 241,766
 15.43 5.85 3.9 515
Vested and expected to vest, June 30, 2013 529,637
 12.91 5.45 5.1 1,527
Outstanding at June 30, 2014 412,454
 12.44 5.30 4.4 3,782
Granted 25,703
 23.91 10.38 6.8 
Exercised (95,723) 16.17 5.86  747
Cancelled/Forfeited (13,134) 11.26 5.00  
Outstanding at June 30, 2015 329,300
 12.30 5.54 3.9 3,700
Granted 21,595
 29.48 12.63 6.4 
Exercised (112,895) 12.35 5.37  1,853
Cancelled/Forfeited (18,371) 13.45 6.17  
Outstanding at June 30, 2016 219,629
 13.87 6.28 3.7 3,995
Vested and exercisable, June 30, 2016 180,298
 11.06 5.13 3.1 3,800
Vested and expected to vest, June 30, 2016 217,160
 13.72 6.22 3.6 3,983
The aggregate intrinsic values outstanding at the end of each fiscal period in the table above represent the total pretax intrinsic value, based on the Company’s closing stock price of $14.06 at June 28, 2013, $7.96$32.06 at June 29, 2012 and $10.1430, 2016, $23.50 at June 30, 2011,2015 and $21.61 at June 30, 2014, representing the last trading day of the respective fiscal years, which would have been received by awardNQO holders had all award holders exercised their awardsNQOs that were in-the-money as of those dates. The aggregate intrinsic value of stock option exercises in each fiscal period above represents the difference between the exercise price and the value of the Company’s common stock at the time of exercise. NQOs outstanding that are expected to vest are net of estimated forfeitures.
Total fair value of optionsNQOs vested during fiscal 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 20112014 was $1.0$0.3 million,, $1.2 $0.5 million and $0.7$0.7 million,, respectively. The Company received $1.4 million in proceeds from exercises of vested NQOs in fiscal 2016, and $1.5 million in proceeds from exercises of vested NQOs in each of fiscal 2015 and 2014.

79

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)


Nonvested Stock Options: 
Number
of
Stock
Options
 
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price ($)
 
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value ($)
 
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Life (Years)
Outstanding at June 30, 2010 300,794
 19.42 6.22 2.1
Granted 327,656
 14.95 7.05 
Vested (105,458) 20.29 6.30 
Forfeited (200,123) 18.74 7.09 
Outstanding at June 30, 2011 322,869
 15.02 6.50 1.7
Granted 356,834
 8.90 4.42 6.6
Vested (243,518) 13.00 5.85 
Forfeited (92,946) 12.54 5.80 
Outstanding at June 30, 2012 343,239
 10.76 4.20 6.3
Granted 192,892
 12.12 5.69 6.5
Vested (188,909) 11.56 5.33 
Forfeited (31,561) 13.82 5.92 
Outstanding at June 30, 2013 315,661
 10.80 5.12 6.1

The following table summarizes nonvested NQO activity for the three most recent fiscal years:
Nonvested NQOs: 
Number
of
NQOs
 
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price ($)
 
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value ($)
 
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Life (Years)
Outstanding at June 30, 2013 315,661
 10.80 5.12 6.1
Granted 1,927
 18.68 9.17 6.4
Vested (133,957) 11.02 5.21 
Forfeited (15,833) 11.48 5.49 
Outstanding at June 30, 2014 167,798
 10.65 5.06 5.3
Granted 25,703
 23.91 10.38 6.8
Vested (101,172) 9.87 4.72 
Forfeited (12,134) 10.31 4.91 
Outstanding at June 30, 2015 80,195
 15.94 7.21 5.2
Granted 21,595
 29.48 12.63 6.4
Vested (47,418) 14.05 6.44 
Forfeited (15,641) 12.95 6.09 
Outstanding at June 30, 2016 38,731
 27.02 11.63 6.1

As of June 30, 2013, 20122016 and 2011,2015, there was approximately $0.4 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to NQOs. The unrecognized compensation cost related to NQOs at June 30, 2016 is expected to be recognized over the weighted average period of 2.2 years. Total compensation expense for NQOs was $0.2 million, $0.4 million and $0.6 million in fiscal 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
Non-qualified stock options with performance-based and time-based vesting ($1.3PNQs”)
In the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016, the Company granted a total of 143,466 shares with an exercise price of $29.48 per share to eligible employees under the Amended Equity Plan. With the exception of a portion of the award to the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer as described below, these PNQs vest over a three-year period with one-third of the total number of shares subject to each such PNQ becoming exercisable each year on the anniversary of the grant date, based on the Company’s achievement of modified net income targets for fiscal 2016 ("Fiscal 2016 Target") as approved by the Compensation Committee, subject to the participant’s employment by the Company or service on the Board of Directors of the Company on the applicable vesting date and the acceleration provisions contained in the Amended Equity Plan and the applicable award agreement. But if actual modified net income for fiscal 2016 is less than the Fiscal 2016 Target, then 20% of the total shares issuable under such grant will be forfeited.
On June 3, 2016, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company determined that a portion of the non-qualified stock option granted to Michael H. Keown, the Company's President and Chief Executive Officer, on December 3, 2015 (the “Original Option”) was invalid because such portion caused the total number of option shares granted to Mr. Keown in calendar year 2015 to exceed the limit of 75,000 shares that may be granted to a participant in a single calendar year under the Amended Equity Plan by 22,862 shares. Therefore, the Compensation Committee reduced the total number of shares of common stock issuable under the Original Option by 22,862 shares. The reduction of the 22,862 excess option shares brought the total number of option shares granted to Mr. Keown in calendar 2015 within the limitation of the Amended Equity Plan.
In addition, on June 3, 2016, the Compensation Committee, in accordance with the provisions of the Amended Equity Plan, granted Mr. Keown a non-qualified stock option to purchase 22,862 shares of the Company's common stock (the “New Option”) with an exercise price of $29.48 per share, which was the greater of the exercise price of the Original Option and the closing price of the Company's common stock as reported on the NASDAQ Global Market on June 3, 2016, the date of grant. The New Option is subject to the same terms and conditions of the Original Option including an expiration date of December 3, 2022, and the three-year vesting schedule, except that to comply with the Amended Equity Plan's minimum vesting schedule of one year from the grant date, one-third of shares issuable under the New Option will vest on June 3, 2017, and the remainder of the New Option shares will vest one-third each on the second and third anniversaries of the grant date of the Original Option,

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)


based on the Company’s achievement of the same performance goals as the Original Option, subject to Mr. Keown’s continued employment on the applicable vesting date.
In the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015, the Company granted 121,024 shares issuable upon the exercise of PNQs with an exercise price of $23.44 per share to eligible employees under the Amended Equity Plan. These PNQs vest over a three-year period with one-third of the total number of shares subject to each such PNQ becoming exercisable each year on the anniversary of the grant date, based on the Company’s achievement of modified net income targets for fiscal years within the performance period as approved by the Compensation Committee, subject to catch-up vesting of previously unvested shares in a subsequent year within the three year period in which a cumulative modified net income target as approved by the Compensation Committee is achieved, in each case, subject to the participant’s employment by the Company or service on the Board of Directors of the Company on the applicable vesting date and the acceleration provisions contained in the Amended Equity Plan and the applicable award agreement.
In the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014, the Company granted a total of 112,442 shares issuable upon the exercise of PNQs with a weighted average exercise price of $21.27 per share to eligible employees under the Amended Equity Plan. These PNQs vest over a three-year period with one-third of the total number of shares subject to each such PNQ vesting on the first anniversary of the grant date based on the Company’s achievement of a modified net income target for the first fiscal year of the performance period as approved by the Compensation Committee, and the remaining two-thirds of the total number of shares subject to each PNQ vesting on the third anniversary of the grant date based on the Company’s achievement of a cumulative modified net income target for all three years during the performance period as approved by the Compensation Committee, in each case, subject to the participant’s employment by the Company or service on the Board of Directors of the Company on the applicable vesting date. No PNQs were granted prior to fiscal 2014.
Following are the assumptions used in the Black-Scholes valuation model for PNQs granted during the fiscal years ended June 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014:
  Year Ended June 30,
  2016 2015 2014
Weighted average fair value of PNQs $11.38
 $10.16
 $10.49
Risk-free interest rate 1.6% 1.5% 1.8%
Dividend yield 
 % %
Average expected term (years) 4.9
 5.0
 6.0
Expected stock price volatility 42.5% 47.9% 50.5%


Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)


The following table summarizes PNQ activity for the three most recent fiscal years:
Outstanding PNQs: 
Number
of
PNQs
 
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price ($)
 
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value ($)
 
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Life
(Years)
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
($ in 
thousands)
Outstanding at June 30, 2013 
    
Granted 112,442
 21.27 10.49 6.5 
Cancelled/Forfeited 
    
Outstanding at June 30, 2014 112,442
 21.27 10.49 6.5 38
Granted 121,024
 23.44 10.16 6.6 
Cancelled/Forfeited (9,399) 21.33 10.52  
Outstanding at June 30, 2015 224,067
 22.44 10.31 6.0 237
Granted 143,466
 29.48 11.38 6.2 
Exercised (14,144) 21.20 10.45 0 107
Cancelled/Forfeited (64,790) 23.20 10.37 0 
Outstanding at June 30, 2016 288,599
 25.83 10.82 5.7 1,798
Vested and exercisable, June 30, 2016 48,132
 22.52 10.31 5.1 459
Vested and expected to vest, June 30, 2016 274,919
 25.75 10.81 5.7 1,736

The aggregate intrinsic values outstanding at the end of each fiscal period in the table above represent the total pretax intrinsic values, based on the Company’s closing stock price of $32.06 at June 30, 2016, $23.50 at June 30, 2015 and $21.61 at June 30, 2014 representing the last trading day of the respective fiscal years, which would have been received by PNQ holders had all award holders exercised their PNQs that were in-the-money as of those dates. The aggregate intrinsic value of stock option exercises in fiscal 2016 represents the difference between the exercise price and the value of the Company’s common stock at the time of exercise. PNQs outstanding that are expected to vest are net of estimated forfeitures.
Total fair value of PNQs vested during the fiscal years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 was $0.3 million, $1.3 million and $0.4 million, respectively. No PNQs vested during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014. The Company received $0.3 million in proceeds from exercises of vested PNQs in fiscal 2016, and no PNQs were exercised during the fiscal years ended June 30, 2015 or 2014.
As of June 30, 2016, the Company met the performance target for the first year of the fiscal 2014 and 2015 awards and expects that it will achieve the performance targets set forth in the PNQ agreements for the remainder of the fiscal 2014, fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2016 awards.
The following table summarizes nonvested NQO activity for the two most recent fiscal years:$1.5
Nonvested PNQs: 
Number
of
PNQs
 
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price ($)
 
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value ($)
 
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Life (Years)
Outstanding at June 30, 2014 112,442
 21.27
 10.49
 6.5
Granted 121,024
 23.44
 10.16
 6.6
Vested (34,959) 21.27
 10.49
 
Forfeited (9,399) 21.33
 10.52
 
Outstanding at June 30, 2015 189,108
 22.66
 10.28
 6.2
Granted 143,466
 29.48
 11.38
 6.2
Vested (27,317) 10.16
 23.44
 
Forfeited (64,790) 23.20
 10.37
 
Outstanding at June 30, 2016 240,467
 26.49
 10.92
 5.9

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)


As of June 30, 2016 and 2015, there was $1.9 million and $1.5 million , respectively, of unrecognized compensation cost related to stock options. CompensationPNQs. The unrecognized compensation cost related to PNQs at June 30, 2016 is expected to be recognized over the weighted average period of 1.5 years. Total compensation expense recognizedrelated to PNQs in generalfiscal 2016, 2015 and administrative expenses2014 was $0.9$0.5 million,, $1.2 $0.5 million and $0.7$0.3 million, for fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
Restricted Stock
During each of fiscal 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 20112014 the Company granted a total of 51,17710,170 shares, 142,07013,256 shares and 63,9799,200 shares of restricted stock under the Amended Equity Plan, respectively, with a weighted average grant date fair value of $11.67, $7.70$29.99, $23.64, and $16.67$20.48 per share, respectively, to eligible employees officers and directors under the Omnibus Plan.directors. Shares of restricted stock generally vest at the end of three years for eligible employees and officers who are employees. The fiscal 2012 grants included awards to executive officers with different vesting periods, in each case, subject to accelerated vesting as provided in the applicable employment agreement or award agreement with the executive officer. Shares of restricted stock generally vest ratably over a period of three years for directors. During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016, 24,841 shares of restricted stock vested, of which 5,177 shares were withheld to meet the employees’ minimum statutory tax withholding and retired.
Compensation expense is recognized on a straight-line basis overThe following table summarizes restricted stock activity for the servicethree most recent fiscal years:
Outstanding and Nonvested Restricted Stock Awards: 
Shares
Awarded
 
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
($)
 
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Life
(Years)
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
($ in thousands)
Outstanding at June 30, 2013 139,360
 9.87
 1.9 1,959
Granted 9,200
 20.48
  188
Exercised/Released (38,212) 11.59
  820
Cancelled/Forfeited (14,136) 9.38
  
Outstanding at June 30, 2014 96,212
 10.27
 1.5 2,079
Granted 13,256
 23.64
  313
Exercised/Released(1) (53,402) 8.43
  1,377
Cancelled/Forfeited (8,984) 8.36
  
Outstanding at June 30, 2015 47,082
 16.48
 1.2 1,106
Granted 10,170
 29.99
  305
Exercised/Released(2) (24,841) 14.08
  747
Cancelled/Forfeited (8,619) 13.06
  
Outstanding at June 30, 2016 23,792
 26.00
 1.8 763
Expected to vest, June 30, 2016 22,253
 25.91
 1.8 713
__________
(1) Includes 4,297 shares that were withheld to meet the employees' minimum statutory tax withholding and retired..
(2) Includes 5,177 shares that were withheld to meet the employees' minimum statutory tax withholding and retired.

The aggregate intrinsic value of shares outstanding at the end of each fiscal period in the table above represent the total pretax intrinsic values, based on the estimated fair valueCompany’s closing stock price of $32.06 at June 30, 2016, $23.50 at June 30, 2015 and $21.61 at June 30, 2014 , representing the last trading day of the restricted stock. Compensation expense recognized in general and administrative expenses was $0.6 million, $0.6 million and $0.5 million, for therespective fiscal years ended years. Restricted stock that is expected to vest is net of estimated forfeitures.
As of June 30, 2013, 20122016 and 2011, respectively. As of June 30, 2013, 2012 and 2011,2015, there was approximately $1.0$0.5 million, $1.3 million and $0.9 million, respectively, of unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted stock. The unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted stock at June 30, 2016 is expected to be recognized over the weighted average period of 2.0 years. Total compensation expense for restricted stock was $0.2 million, $0.3 million and $0.5 million, for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

80

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)


The following table summarizes restricted stock activity:
Outstanding and Nonvested Restricted Stock Awards: 
Shares
Awarded
 
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
($)
 
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Life
(Years)
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
($ in thousands)
Outstanding at June 30, 2010 80,208
 19.91
 2.0 1,210
Granted 63,979
 16.67
  1,066
Exercised/Released (20,674) 21.52
  332
Cancelled/Forfeited (42,826) 19.19
  497
Outstanding at June 30, 2011 80,687
 17.31
 2.6 818
Granted 142,070
 7.70
 2.1 1,094
Exercised/Released (27,227) 15.80
  202
Cancelled/Forfeited (19,583) 13.92
  
Outstanding June 30, 2012 175,947
 10.16
 1.9 1,401
Granted 51,177
 11.67
  597
Exercised/Released (64,668) 11.27
  832
Cancelled/Forfeited (23,096) 12.21
  
Outstanding at June 30, 2013 139,360
 9.87
 1.9 1,959
Expected to vest, June 30, 2013 117,099
 9.84
 1.9 1,646

Note 15.18. Other Current Liabilities
Other current liabilities consist of the following:
 June 30, June 30,
 2013 2012
   As Restated
 (In thousands)
(In thousands) 2016 2015
Accrued postretirement benefits $625
 $798
 $1,060
 $1,051
Accrued workers’ compensation liabilities 1,496
 1,244
 3,225
 2,382
Short-term pension liabilities 347
 686
 347
 347
Earnout payable—RLC acquisition 100
 100
Other (including net taxes payable) 2,703
 2,568
 2,214
 2,272
 $5,171
 $5,296
Other current liabilities $6,946
 $6,152

81

Farmer Bros. Co.Note 19. Other Long-Term Liabilities
NotesOther long-term liabilities include the following:
  June 30,
(In thousands) 2016 2015
New Facility lease obligation(1) $28,110
 $
Earnout payable—RLC acquisition(2) 100
 200
Derivative liabilities, non-current 
 25
Other long-term liabilities $28,210
 $225
___________
(1) Lease obligation associated with construction of the New Facility (see Note 4).
(2) Earnout payable to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)RLC (see
Note 2).


Note 16.20. Income Taxes

The current and deferred components of the provision for income taxes consist of the following: 
 June 30, June 30,
 2013 2012 2011
   As Restated As Restated
 (In thousands)
(In thousands) 2016 2015 2014
Current:            
Federal $(24) $(385) $(4) $214
 $(30) $293
State 191
 115
 323
 103
 309
 275
Total current income tax expense (benefit) 167
 (270) 319
Total current income tax expense 317
 279
 568
Deferred:            
Federal (819) (63) (11,373) (66,648) 106
 99
State (173) (14) (2,342) (13,666) 17
 38
Total deferred income tax benefit (992) (77) (13,715)
Income tax benefit $(825) $(347) $(13,396)
Total deferred income tax (benefit) expense (80,314) 123
 137
Income tax (benefit) expense $(79,997) $402
 $705
Income tax expense or benefit from continuing operations is generally determined without regard to other categories of earnings, such as discontinued operations and OCI. An exception is provided in ASC 740, "Tax“Tax Provisions," when there is aggregate income from categories other than continuing operations and a loss from continuing operations in the current year. In this case, the income tax benefit allocated to continuing operations is the amount by which the loss from continuing operations reduces the income tax expense recorded with respect to the other categories of earnings, even when a valuation allowance has been established against the deferred tax assets. In instances where a valuation allowance is established against current year losses, income from other sources, including gain from postretirement benefits recorded as a component of OCI, is considered when determining whether sufficient future taxable income exists to realize the deferred tax assets.

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)


As a result, for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, the Company recorded income tax expense of $1.1of$2.0 million,, $0 $0, and $14.1 million,$0, respectively, in OCI related to the gain on postretirement benefits, and recorded a corresponding income tax benefit of $1.1$2.0 million,, $0 $0, and $14.1 million,$0, respectively, in continuing operations.
A reconciliation of income tax benefit(benefit) expense to the federal statutory tax rate is as follows: 
 June 30, June 30,
 2013 2012 2011
   As Restated As Restated
(In thousands) 2016 2015 2014
Statutory tax rate 34% 34% 34% 35% 34% 34%
 (In thousands)
Income tax benefit at statutory rate $(3,158) $(9,154) $(22,246)
State income tax (net of federal tax benefit) (223) (1,023) (2,874)
Income tax expense at statutory rate $3,472
 $358
 $4,365
State income tax expense, net of federal tax benefit 557
 260
 749
Dividend income exclusion 
 (85) (532) (140) (54) 
Valuation allowance 3,074
 10,588
 13,188
 (83,230) (185) (4,292)
Change in tax rate (1,061) 
 
Retiree life insurance 135
 
 
Change in contingency reserve (net) (7) (561) (1,308) 
 
 (39)
Research tax credit (net) 
 (15) (16)
Other (net) (511) (97) 392
 270
 23
 (78)
Income tax benefit $(825) $(347) $(13,396)
Income tax (benefit) expense $(79,997) $402
 $705

82

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

The primary components of the temporary differences which give rise to the Company’s net deferred tax liabilities are as follows: 
 June 30, June 30,
 2013 2012 2011
   As Restated As Restated
 (In thousands)
(In thousands) 2016 2015 2014
Deferred tax assets:            
Postretirement benefits $26,014
 $27,568
 $18,260
 $33,273
 $31,100
 $19,800
Accrued liabilities 4,477
 3,958
 4,138
 11,760
 10,091
 6,156
Capital loss carryforward 1,105
 2,865
 2,945
Net operating loss carryforward 44,607
 44,736
 36,328
Net operating loss carryforwards 38,196
 41,544
 40,275
Intangible assets 694
 919
 
 71
 594
 1,126
Other 7,840
 3,080
 5,458
 6,881
 6,794
 7,253
Total deferred tax assets 84,737
 83,126
 67,129
 90,181
 90,123
 74,610
Deferred tax liabilities:            
Unrealized gain on investments (609) (2,242) 
Fixed assets (2,641) (4,117) (7,881) (5,370) (2,647) (1,902)
Intangible assets 
 
 (1,032)
Other (882) (794) (814) (1,789) (1,943) (1,538)
Total deferred tax liabilities (3,523) (4,911) (9,727) (7,768) (6,832) (3,440)
Valuation allowance (82,522) (79,448) (58,712) (1,627) (84,857) (72,613)
Net deferred tax liability $(1,308) $(1,233) $(1,310)
Net deferred tax assets (liabilities) $80,786
 $(1,566) $(1,443)
TheAt June 30, 2016, the Company hashad approximately $114.4$99.7 million and $112.7 million of in federal and $88.6 million in state net operating loss carryforwards that will begin to expire in the years ending June 30, 20252030 and June 30, 2020,2017, respectively. The Company also has approximately $2.7 million and $1.2 million of federal and state capital loss carryforwards, respectively, that may only be used to offset capital gains that begin expiring in Additionally, at June 30, 2014. Additionally,2016, the Company has $0.8had $0.8 million of federal business tax credits that begin expiringto expire in June 30, 2025 and $2.2 million2025.
As of charitable contributions carryforwards that begin expiring in June 30, 2014.2016, the Company has generated approximately $1.2 million of excess tax benefits related to stock compensation, the benefit of which will be recorded to additional paid in capital if and when realized.
At June 30, 2013,2016, the Company had total deferred tax assets of $84.7$90.2 million and net deferred tax assets before valuation allowance of $81.2 million. $82.4 million.
The Company evaluated it deferred tax assets quarterly to determine if a valuation is required. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016, the Company considered whether a valuation allowance should be recorded against deferred tax assets based on the likelihood that the benefits of the deferred tax assets would or would not ultimately be realized in future periods. In making

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)


such assessment, significant weight was given to evidence that could be objectively verified such as recent operating results and less consideration was given to less objective indicators such as future earningsincome projections.
After consideration of positive and negative evidence, including the recent history of losses,income, the Company cannot concludeconcluded that it is more likely than not that itthe Company will generate future earningsincome sufficient to realize the majority of the Company’s deferred tax assets as of June 30, 2013.2016. Accordingly, the Company has recorded a reduction in its valuation allowance in fiscal 2016 in the amount of $83.2 million.
The Company cannot conclude that certain state net operating loss carry forwards and tax credit carryovers will be utilized before expiration. Accordingly, the Company will maintain a valuation allowance of $82.5$1.6 million has been recorded to offset this deferred tax asset. The valuation allowance decreased $83.2 million and $12.3 million, respectively, in fiscal 2016 and 2015 and increased by $3.1$9.9 million, $20.7 million in fiscal 2014. The Company will continue to monitor all available evidence, both positive and $13.3 million,negative, in determining whether it is more likely than not that the fiscal years ended June 30, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.Company will realize its remaining deferred tax assets.
A tabular reconciliation of the total amounts (in absolute values) of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows: 
  Year Ended June 30,
  2013 2012 2011
    As Restated As Restated
   (In thousands)
Unrecognized tax benefits at beginning of year $3,211
 $3,902
 $5,218
Increases in tax positions for prior years 
 
 
(Decreases) increases in tax positions for current year 
 
 (1,316)
Settlements 
 (691) 
Lapse in statute of limitations 
 
 
Unrecognized tax benefits at end of year $3,211
 $3,211
 $3,902

83

Farmer Bros. Co.
  Year Ended June 30,
(In thousands) 2016 2015 2014
Unrecognized tax benefits at beginning of year $
 $
 $3,211
Decreases in tax positions for prior years 
 
 (30)
Settlements 
 
 (3,181)
Unrecognized tax benefits at end of year $
 $
 $
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

At June 30, 20132016 and 2012,2015, the Company has approximately $3.1 million and $3.1 million, respectively, ofno unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate, subject to the valuation allowance. benefits.
The Company believes it is reasonably possible that none of its total unrecognized tax benefits could be releasedmade a determination in the next 12 months.
quarter ended June 30, 2014 that it would not, at that time, pursue certain refund claims requested on its amended tax returns for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2003 through June 30, 2008. The Company appealed a decision reached by the Internal Revenue Service regarding its June 30, 2003 through June 30, 2008 tax returns,previously denied these refund claims upon audit and in August 2013 the appeals officer upheld the audit result. Additionally, in January 2012, the State of California completed an audit of the Company's June 30, 2006 and June 30, 2007 tax returns, and the Company also reached a Settlement Agreement with the State of California regarding the Company's June 30, 2002 to June 30, 2005 research and development tax credit claims. As a result of these decisions, themaintained that decision upon appeal. The Company released none of the unrecognizedits tax benefitreserve related to these refunds in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013.2014.
The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. and in various state jurisdictions with varying statutes of limitations. The Company is no longer subject to U.S. income tax examinations for the fiscal years prior to June 30, 2003.2012. The Internal Revenue Service is currently auditing the Company's tax years ended June 30, 2013 and 2014.
The Company’s policy is to recognize interest expense and penalties related to income tax matters as a component of income tax expense. AsIn each of the fiscal years ended June 30, 20132016 and 2012,2015, the Company recorded $0 and $10,000, respectively,$0 in accrued interest and penalties associated with uncertain tax positions. Additionally, the Company recorded income (expense) of $10,000, $37,000 and $(12,000),$0 related to interest and penalties on uncertain tax positions in the fiscal years ended June 30, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, respectively.
Note 17. Earnings (Loss)21. Net Income Per Common Share 
  Year ended June 30,
2013 2012 2011
    As Restated As Restated
  (In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Net loss attributable to common stockholders—basic $(8,401) $(26,274) $(51,631)
Net loss attributable to nonvested restricted stockholders (61) (302) (402)
Total net loss $(8,462) $(26,576) $(52,033)
     
Weighted average shares outstanding—basic 15,604,452
 15,492,314
 15,066,663
Effect of dilutive securities:      
Shares issuable under stock options 
 
 
Weighted average shares outstanding—diluted 15,604,452
 15,492,314
 15,066,663
Net loss per common share—basic and diluted $(0.54) $(1.72) $(3.45)
  Year ended June 30,
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts) 2016 2015 2014
Net income attributable to common stockholders—basic $89,812
 $651
 $12,063
Net income attributable to nonvested restricted stockholders 106
 1
 69
Net income $89,918
 $652
 $12,132
       
Weighted average common shares outstanding—basic 16,502,523
 16,127,610
 15,909,631
Effect of dilutive securities:      
Shares issuable under stock options 124,879
 139,524
 104,956
Weighted average common shares outstanding—diluted 16,627,402
 16,267,134
 16,014,587
Net income per common share—basic $5.45
 $0.04
 $0.76
Net income per common share—diluted $5.41
 $0.04
 $0.76


Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)


Note 18.22. Commitments and Contingencies
Leases
WithOn July 17, 2015, the acquisitionCompany entered into the Lease Agreement, with lessor pursuant to which the Company leased the New Facility (see Note 4). The Company recorded an asset related to the New Facility lease obligation included in property, plant and equipment of the DSD Coffee Business in the fiscal year ended $28.1 million at June 30, 20092016 with an offsetting liability of $28.1 million for the lease obligation included in "Other long-term liabilities" on the Company's consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2016. There were no such amounts recorded at June 30, 2015 (see Note 19,). On June 15, 2016, the Company assumed some ofexercised its option to purchase the operating lease obligations associated withpartially constructed New Facility under the acquired vehicles. The Company also refinanced some of the existing leases and entered into new capital leases for certain vehicles.Lease Agreement. The terms of the Company's capital leases vary from 12 months to 84 months with varying expiration dates through 2020.2021.
The Company is also obligated under operating leases for branch warehouses.warehouses, distribution centers and its production facility in Portland, Oregon. Some operating leases have renewal options that allow the Company, as lessee, to extend the leases. The Company has one operating lease with a term greater than five years that expires in 2018 and has a ten year renewal option, and operating leases for computer hardware with terms that do not exceed five years.three years. Rent expense for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 20112014 was $3.6$4.5 million,, $4.5 $3.8 million and $3.7 million, respectively.
Contractual obligations for future fiscal years are as follows:
  Contractual Obligations
(In thousands) 
Capital Lease
Obligations
 
Operating
 Lease
Obligations
 New Facility Purchase Option Exercise Price(1) 
Pension Plan
Obligations
 
Postretirement
Benefits Other
Than Pension Plans
 Revolving Credit Facility Purchase Commitments (2)
Year Ended June 30,              
2017 $1,443
 $4,093
 $58,779
 $8,075
 $1,080
 $109
 $72,217
2018 $880
 $3,366
 $
 $8,304
 $1,102
 $
 $
2019 $125
 $2,561
 $
 $8,554
 $1,143
 $
 $
2020 $52
 $1,279
 $
 $8,844
 $1,176
 $
 $
2021 $4
 $441
 $
 $9,074
 $1,210
 $
 $
Thereafter $
 $61
 $
 $47,099
 $6,246
 $
 $
    $11,801
 $58,779
 $89,950
 $11,957
 $109
 $72,217
Total minimum lease payments $2,504
            
Less: imputed interest
   (0.82% to 10.7%)
 $(145)            
Present value of future minimum lease payments $2,359
            
Less: current portion $1,323
            
Long-term capital lease obligations $1,036
            
___________
$6.3 million(1) Includes estimated purchase option exercise price pursuant to the Lease Agreement for the partially constructed New Facility. The table above reflects purchase option exercise price based on the budget and after completion of the construction, payable in fiscal year ending June 30, 2017 (see Note 4, respectively.). The actual purchase option exercise price will be based on actual construction-related costs for the partially constructed facility as of the purchase option closing date.
In May 2011,(2) Purchase commitments include commitments under coffee purchase contracts for which all delivery terms have been finalized but the related coffee has not been received as of June 30, 2016. Amounts shown in the table above: (a) include all coffee purchase contracts that the Company didconsiders to be from normal purchases; and (b) do not meetinclude amounts related to derivative instruments that are recorded at fair value on the minimumCompany’s consolidated balance sheets.

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)



Self-Insurance
At June 30, 2016 and 2015, the Company had posted a $7.4 million and $7.0 million letter of credit, rating criteriarespectively, as a security deposit with the State of California Department of Industrial Relations Self-Insurance Plans for participation in the alternative security program for California self-insurers. As a result,self-insurers for workers’ compensation liability. At June 30, 2016 and 2015, the Company was required to posthad posted a $5.9$4.3 million letter of credit as a security deposit to the Statefor self-insuring workers’ compensation, general liability and auto insurance coverages outside of California Department of Industrial Relations Self-Insurance Plans. California.
Non-cancelable Purchase Orders
As of June 30, 2013, this letter of credit continues2016, the Company had committed to serve as a security depositpurchase green coffee inventory totaling $62.5 million under fixed-price contracts, equipment for the New Facility totaling $3.3 million and has been reduced to $5.4other inventory totaling $6.3 million. under non-cancelable purchase orders.

84

Farmer Bros. Co.Legal Proceedings
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

Contractual obligations for future fiscal years are as follows (in thousands):
  Contractual Obligations

Year Ended June 30,
 
Capital Lease
Obligations
 
Operating
 Lease
Obligations
 
Pension Plan
Obligations
 
Postretirement
Benefits Other
Than Pension Plans
 Revolving Credit Facility Purchase Commitments
2014 $4,001
 $3,868
 $6,641
 $640
 $9,654
 $18,583
2015 3,692
 3,130
 6,794
 762
 10,000
 
2016 3,376
 2,151
 6,951
 836
 
 
2017 1,469
 1,398
 7,228
 913
 
 
2018 797
 1,214
 7,477
 1,034
 
 
Thereafter 93
 833
 42,443
 6,522
 
 
    $12,594
 $77,534
 $10,707
 $19,654
 $18,583
Total minimum lease payments $13,428
          
Less: imputed interest
   (0.82% to 10.7%)
 (1,260)          
Present value of future minimum lease payments $12,168
          
Less: current portion 3,409
          
Long-term capital lease obligations $8,759
          

On August 31, 2012, the Council for Education and Research on Toxics (“CERT”) v. Brad Berry Company Ltd., et al., Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles
On August 31, 2012, CERT filed an amendment to a private enforcement action adding a number of companies as defendants, including CBI, which sell coffee in California. The suit alleges that the defendants have failed to issue clear and reasonable warnings in accordance with Proposition 65 that the coffee they produce, distribute and sell contains acrylamide. This lawsuit was filed in Los Angeles Superior Court (the “Court”). CERT has requesteddemanded that the alleged violators remove acrylamide from their coffee or provide Proposition 65 warnings on their products and pay $2,500 per day for each and every violation while they are in violation of Proposition 65.
Acrylamide is produced naturally in connection with the heating of many foods, especially starchy foods, and is believed to be caused by the Maillard reaction, though it has also been found in unheated foods such as olives. With respect to coffee, acrylamide is produced when coffee beans are heated during the roasting process-it is the roasting itself that produces the acrylamide. While there has been a significant amount of research concerning proposals for treatments and other processes aimed at reducing acrylamide content of different types of foods, to our knowledge there is currently no known strategy for reducing acrylamide in coffee without negatively impacting the sensorial properties of the product.
The Company has joined a Joint Defense Group and, along with the other co-defendants, has answered the complaint, denying, generally, the allegations of the complaint, including the claimed violation of Proposition 65 and further denying CERT’s right to any relief or damages, including the right to require a warning on products. The Joint Defense Group contends that based on proper scientific analysis and proper application of the standards set forth in Proposition 65, exposures to acrylamide from the coffee products pose no significant risk of cancer and, thus, these exposures are exempt from Proposition 65’s warning requirement.
To date, the pleadings stage of the case has been completed. DiscoveryThe Court has phased trial so that the “no significant risk level” defense, the First Amendment defense, and the preemption defense will be tried first. Fact discovery and expert discovery on these “Phase 1” defenses have been completed, and the parties filed trial briefs. Trial commenced on September 8, 2014, and testimony completed on November 4, 2014, for the three Phase 1 defenses.   Following two continuances, the court heard on April 9, 2015 final arguments on the Phase 1 issues. On July 25, 2015, the Court issued its Proposed Statement of Decision with respect to Phase 1 defenses against the defendants, which was confirmed, on September 2, 2015 in preparationthe Final Statement of Decision. The Court has stated that all defendants would be included in “Phase 2,” though this remains unresolved, including the extent of the involvement or participation in discovery. Following permission from the Court, on October 14, 2015 the Joint Defense Group filed a writ petition for trial recently commenced, followingan interlocutory appeal. In late December 2015, plaintiff’s counsel served letters proposing a stay whilenew plan to file the anticipated motion for summary adjudication and a new set of discovery on all defendants. On January 14, 2016, the Court of Appeals denied the Joint Defense Group’s writ petition thereby denying the interlocutory appeal. On February 16, 2016, CERT filed a motion for summary adjudication arguing that based upon facts that had been stipulated by defendants, CERT had proven its prima facie case and all that remains is a determination of whether any affirmative defenses are available to defendants. On March 16, 2016, the Court reinstated the stay on discovery for all defendant parties except for the four largest defendants, so the Company is not currently obligated to participate in discovery. Following a hearing on April 20, 2016, the Court granted

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)


CERT’s motion for summary adjudication on its prima facie case. Plaintiff filed its motion for summary adjudication of affirmatives defenses on May 16, 2016 and the defendants’ opposition brief was resolved in a related case.filed on July 22, 2016. Certain discovery responses were scheduled to be due by September 9, 2016. At an August 19, 2016 hearing on Plaintiff’s motion for summary adjudication and defendants’ opposition with respect to the affirmative defenses, the Court denied Plaintiff’s motion, thus the Joint Defense Group will continue to be able to present the affirmative defenses at trial. At this time, the Company is not able to predict the probability of the outcome or estimate of loss, if any, related to these matters.this matter. 
Steve Hernandez vs. Farmer Bros. Co., Superior Court of State of California, County of Los Angeles
On July 24, 2015, former Company employee Hernandez filed a putative class action complaint for damages alleging a single cause of action for unfair competition under the California Business & Professions Code. The claim purports to seek disgorgement of profits for alleged violations of various provisions of the California Labor Code relating to: failing to pay overtime, failing to provide meal breaks, failing to pay minimum wage, failing to pay wages timely during employment and upon termination, failing to provide accurate and complete wage statements, and failing to reimburse business-related expenses. Hernandez’s complaint seeks restitution in an unspecified amount and injunctive relief, in addition to attorneys’ fees and expenses. Hernandez alleges that the putative class is all “current and former hourly-paid or non-exempt individuals” for the four (4) years preceding the filing of the complaint through final judgment, and Hernandez also purports to reserve the right to establish sub-classes as appropriate.  On November 12, 2015, a separate putative class representative, Monica Zuno, filed claim under the same class action; the Court has related this case to the Hernandez case. On November 17, 2015, the unified case was assigned to a judge, and this judge ordered the stay on discovery to remain intact until after a decision on the Company’s demurrer action. The plaintiff filed an Opposition to the Demurrer and, in response, on January 5, 2016, the Company filed a reply to this Opposition to the Demurrer. On February 2, 2016, the Court held a hearing on the demurrer and found in the Company’s favor, sustaining the demurrer in its entirety without leave to amend as to the plaintiff Hernandez, and so dismissing Hernandez’s claims and the related putative class. Claims on behalf of the plaintiff Zuno remain at this time, pending the filing of an amended complaint on behalf of this remaining plaintiff and reduced putative class. The Company provided responses to discovery following a lift by the Court of the stay on discovery. The Court has set a case management conference for October 18, 2016 to give Plaintiff’s counsel time to review the discovery documents the Company produced and determine whether Plaintiff intends to proceed with the case as a putative class action or on an individual basis only. At this time, we are not able to predict the probability of the outcome or estimate of loss, if any, related to this matter.
The Company is a party to various other pending legal and administrative proceedings. It is management’s opinion that the outcome of such proceedings will not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

85

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

Note 19.23. Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
The following tables set forth certain unaudited quarterly information for each of the eight fiscal quarters in the two year period ended June 30, 2013.2016. This quarterly information has been prepared on a consistent basis with the audited consolidated financial statements and, in the opinion of management, includes all adjustments which management believes are necessary for a fair presentation of the information for the periods presented. The unaudited quarterly data presented below, with the exception of the quarter ended June 30, 2013, have been restated to correct errors related to the Company's accounting for certain postretirement benefit obligations for its retiree medical plan, failure to timely adopt accounting guidance relating to a postretirement death benefit, when originally issued, and failure to record the appropriate amounts reflecting the cash surrender value of life insurance policies purchased by the Company to fund the postretirement death benefit, as well as to reflect corrections for certain immaterial adjustments and reclassifications to conform to the current year presentation. See Note 2 for additional information. In addition, reconciliations from the amounts as originally reported to the applicable restated amounts for the quarters ended March 31, 2013, December 31, 2012, September 30, 2012, June 30, 2012, March 31, 2012, December 31, 2011 and September 30, 2011 can be found in the unaudited consolidated financial statements immediately following the tables below.
The Company's quarterly operating results may fluctuate significantly as a result of a variety of factors, and operating results for any fiscal quarter are not necessarily indicative of results for a full fiscal year or future fiscal quarters.

  September 30,
2012
 December 31,
2012
 March 31,
2013
 June 30,
2013
  As Restated As Restated As Restated  
  (In thousands, except per share data)
Net sales $119,153
 $135,705
 $126,343
 $128,763
Gross profit $44,621
 $50,353
 $48,675
 $47,490
(Loss) income from operations $(1,419) $547
 $(494) $(2,729)
Net income (loss) $2,979
 $(7,157) $(1,306) $(2,978)
Net income (loss) per common share—basic and diluted $0.19
 $(0.46) $(0.08) $(0.19)
  September 30,
2011
 December 31,
2011
 March 31,
2012
 June 30,
2012
  As Restated As Restated As Restated As Restated
  (In thousands, except per share data)
Net sales $121,197
 $131,770
 $121,527
 $120,948
Gross profit $39,685
 $44,541
 $43,147
 $45,529
Loss from operations $(4,334) $(5,353) $(3,812) $(8,615)
Net loss $(7,280) $(3,813) $(5,211) $(10,272)
Net loss per common share—basic and diluted $(0.48) $(0.25) $(0.33) $(0.65)
During the fourth quarter and for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, the Company recorded $0.1 million in impairment loss on indefinite-lived intangible assets (see Note 1). During the fourth quarter and for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012, the Company recorded $5.1 million in impairment loss on goodwill and $0.5 million in impairment loss on its indefinite-lived intangible assets related to CBI (see Note 1). During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, the Company also recorded $9.2 million in income tax benefit (see Note 16).
The following tables present the effects of adjustments made to the Company's previously reported unaudited consolidated quarterly financial statements for the quarters ended March 31, 2013, December 31, 2012, September 30, 2012, June 30, 2012, March 31, 2012, December 31, 2011 and September 30, 2011. For further information regarding these adjustments, see Note 2.

86

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)


CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share and per share data)March 31, 2013 December 31, 2012
 
Previously
Reported
 Adjustments (1) 
As
Restated
 
Previously
Reported
 Adjustments (1) 
As
Restated
ASSETS           
Current assets:           
Cash and cash equivalents$5,525
 $
 $5,525
 $5,218
 $
 $5,218
Restricted cash3,751
 
 3,751
 
 3,599
 3,599
Short-term investments20,769
 
 20,769
 20,570
 (17) 20,553
Accounts and notes receivable, net42,793
 
 42,793
 43,752
 
 43,752
Inventories67,273
 
 67,273
 68,385
 
 68,385
Income tax receivable139
 (22) 117
 478
 (6) 472
Prepaid expenses2,800
 
 2,800
 2,740
 
 2,740
Total current assets143,050
 (22) 143,028
 141,143
 3,576
 144,719
Property, plant and equipment, net93,837
 1
 93,838
 98,159
 1
 98,160
Intangible assets, net6,586
 
 6,586
 6,929
 
 6,929
Other assets3,026
 2,221
 5,247
 3,052
 2,221
 5,273
Deferred income taxes854
 7
 861
 854
 7
 861
Total assets$247,353
 $2,207
 $249,560
 $250,137
 $5,805
 $255,942
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY           
Current liabilities:           
Accounts payable$30,909
 $(1,031) $29,878
 $31,594
 $(1,141) $30,453
Accrued payroll expenses16,735
 (1,363) 15,372
 18,372
 (1,363) 17,009
Short-term borrowings under revolving credit facility9,912
 
 9,912
 15,074
 
 15,074
Short-term obligations under capital leases3,435
 
 3,435
 3,527
 
 3,527
Short-term derivative liability

5,916
 5,916
 
 6,292
 6,292
Deferred income taxes1,480
 (35) 1,445
 1,479
 (34) 1,445
Other current liabilities16,492
 (9,764) 6,728
 11,691
 (6,449) 5,242
Total current liabilities78,963
 (6,277) 72,686
 81,737
 (2,695) 79,042
Long-term borrowings under revolving credit facility10,000
 
 10,000
 10,000
 
 10,000
Accrued postretirement benefits35,393
 (12,404) 22,989
 35,158
 (12,280) 22,878
Other long-term liabilities—capital leases9,552
 
 9,552
 10,617
 
 10,617
Accrued pension liabilities41,973
 5,678
 47,651
 41,778
 5,678
 47,456
Accrued workers’ compensation liabilities4,022
 
 4,022
 4,022
 
 4,022
Deferred income taxes718
 41
 759
 607
 41
 648
Total liabilities$180,621
 $(12,962) $167,659
 $183,919
 $(9,256) $174,663
Commitments and contingencies           
Stockholders’ equity:           
Preferred stock, $1.00 par value, 500,000 shares authorized and none issued$
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
Common stock, $1.00 par value, 25,000,000 shares authorized; 16,449,456 and 16,341,662 issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively16,449
 
 16,449
 16,342
 
 16,342
  September 30,
2015
 December 31,
2015
 March 31,
2016
 June 30,
2016
(In thousands, except per share data)        
Net sales $133,445
 $142,307
 $134,468
 $134,162
Gross profit $50,579
 $52,908
 $52,560
 $52,428
(Loss) income from operations $(563) $5,361
 $306
 $3,075
Net (loss) income $(1,074) $5,561
 $1,192
 $84,239
Net (loss) income) per common share—basic $(0.07) $0.34
 $0.07
 $5.09
Net (loss) income per common share—diluted $(0.07) $0.34
 $0.07
 $5.05

87

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

(In thousands, except share and per share data)March 31, 2013 December 31, 2012
 
Previously
Reported
 Adjustments (1) 
As
Restated
 
Previously
Reported
 Adjustments (1) 
As
Restated
Additional paid-in capital33,728
 
 33,728
 31,906
 
 31,906
Retained earnings94,620
 2,436
 97,056
 96,035
 2,328
 98,363
Unearned ESOP shares(20,836) 
 (20,836) (20,836) 
 (20,836)
Less accumulated other comprehensive loss (income)(57,229) 12,733
 (44,496) (57,229) 12,733
 (44,496)
Total stockholders’ equity$66,732
 $15,169
 $81,901
 $66,218
 $15,061
 $81,279
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity$247,353
 $2,207
 $249,560
 $250,137
 $5,805
 $255,942
  September 30,
2014
 December 31,
2014
 March 31,
2015
 June 30,
2015
(In thousands, except per share data)        
Net sales $135,984
 $144,809
 $132,507
 $132,582
Gross profit $48,121
 $53,142
 $46,569
 $49,204
Income (loss) from operations $2,601
 $3,505
 $(1,405) $(1,417)
Net income (loss) $2,515
 $2,896
 $(2,572) $(2,187)
Net income (loss) per common share—basic $0.16
 $0.18
 $(0.16) $(0.13)
Net income (loss) per common share—diluted $0.16
 $0.18
 $(0.16) $(0.13)
_______________ In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016, the Company concluded that it is more likely than not that the Company will generate future earnings sufficient to realize the majority of the Company’s deferred tax assets as of June 30, 2016. Accordingly, the Company recorded a reduction in its valuation allowance in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016 in the amount of $83.2 million. See Note 20.
(1)For details see the introduction section included in Note 2.

Note 24. Subsequent Events
Completion of the Sale of Assets
On July 15, 2016, the Company completed the sale of certain property, including the Company’s former headquarters, located at 20333 S. Normandie Avenue, Torrance, CA 90502 (the "Torrance Property"), consisting of approximately 665,000 square feet of buildings located on approximately 20.33 acres of land, for an aggregate cash sale price of $43.0 million. The Company received net proceeds of $42.5 million from the sale of the Torrance Property, after customary adjustments for closing costs and documentary transfer taxes.

Asset Purchase Agreement
On September 9, 2016, a newly-formed, wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, as the Buyer, and China Mist Brands, Inc., dba China Mist Tea Company ("China Mist"), as the Seller, entered into a definitive agreement to purchase substantially all of the assets and certain specified liabilities of China Mist, a provider of flavored iced teas and iced green teas, for an aggregate purchase price of $11.3 million, with $10.8 million to be paid in cash at closing and $0.5 million to be paid as earnout subject to certain conditions. The transaction is expected to close during the second quarter of fiscal 2017.



88

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share and per share data)September 30, 2012 March 31, 2012
 
Previously
Reported
 Adjustments (1) 
As
Restated
 
Previously
Reported
 Adjustments (1) 
As
Restated
ASSETS           
Current assets:           
Cash and cash equivalents$2,545
 $
 $2,545
 $3,463
 $
 $3,463
Restricted cash
 129
 129
 
 1,774
 $1,774
Short-term investments20,591
 (105) 20,486
 18,715
 (229) 18,486
Accounts and notes receivable, net43,139
 
 43,139
 41,685
 
 41,685
Inventories69,924
 
 69,924
 75,762
 (311) 75,451
Income tax receivable388
 (19) 369
 825
 5
 830
Prepaid expenses3,091
 
 3,091
 2,792
 (1) 2,791
Total current assets139,678
 5
 139,683
 143,242
 1,238
 144,480
Property, plant and equipment, net103,315
 2
 103,317
 106,622
 233
 106,855
Goodwill
 
 
 5,310
 
 5,310
Intangible assets, net7,272
 
 7,272
 8,232
 
 8,232
Other assets3,138
 2,220
 5,358
 2,766
 2,073
 4,839
Deferred income taxes854
 7
 861
 1,005
 2
 1,007
Total assets$254,257
 $2,234
 $256,491
 $267,177
 $3,546
 $270,723
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY           
Current liabilities:           
Accounts payable$29,201
 $(5) $29,196
 $31,688
 $
 $31,688
Accrued payroll expenses19,704
 (1,363) 18,341
 16,757
 1,283
 18,040
Short-term borrowings under revolving credit facility24,996
 
 24,996
 28,702
 
 28,702
Short-term obligations under capital leases3,683
 
 3,683
 2,745
 
 2,745
Short-term derivative liability
 29
 29
 
 2,585
 2,585
Deferred income taxes1,480
 (35) 1,445
 500
 (24) 476
Other current liabilities10,148
 (4,880) 5,268
 12,005
 (6,718) 5,287
Total current liabilities89,212
 (6,254) 82,958
 92,397
 (2,874) 89,523
Accrued postretirement benefits34,970
 (12,155) 22,815
 24,715
 (5,476) 19,239
Other long-term liabilities—capital leases11,368
 
 11,368
 9,759
 
 9,759
Accrued pension liabilities41,539
 5,678
 47,217
 21,231
 5,678
 26,909
Accrued workers’ compensation liabilities4,131
 
 4,131
 3,821
 
 3,821
Deferred income taxes607
 42
 649
 1,815
 27
 1,842
Total liabilities$181,827
 $(12,689) $169,138
 $153,738
 $(2,645) $151,093
Commitments and contingencies           
Stockholders’ equity:           
Preferred stock, $1.00 par value, 500,000 shares authorized and none issued$
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
Common stock, $1.00 par value, 25,000,000 shares authorized; 16,314,154 and 16,281,035 issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2012 and March 31, 2012, respectively16,314
 
 16,314
 16,281
 
 16,281
Additional paid-in capital35,653
 
 35,653
 34,093
 
 34,093

89

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

(In thousands, except share and per share data)September 30, 2012 March 31, 2012
 
Previously
Reported
 Adjustments (1) 
As
Restated
 
Previously
Reported
 Adjustments (1) 
As
Restated
Retained earnings103,329
 2,190
 105,519
 112,589
 225
 112,814
Unearned ESOP shares(25,637) 
 (25,637) (25,636) 
 (25,636)
Less accumulated other comprehensive loss (income)(57,229) 12,733
 (44,496) (23,888) 5,966
 (17,922)
Total stockholders’ equity$72,430
 $14,923
 $87,353
 $113,439
 $6,191
 $119,630
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity$254,257
 $2,234
 $256,491
 $267,177
 $3,546
 $270,723
_______________ 
(1)For details see the introduction section included in Note 2.





90

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share and per share data)December 31, 2011 September 30, 2011
 
Previously
Reported
 Adjustments (1) 
As
Restated
 
Previously
Reported
 Adjustments (1) 
As
Restated
ASSETS           
Current assets:           
Cash and cash equivalents$4,121
 $
 $4,121
 $4,552
 $
 $4,552
Restricted cash
 1,813
 1,813
 
 628
 628
Short-term investments18,881
 (1,249) 17,632
 16,193
 (368) 15,825
Accounts and notes receivable, net44,765
 
 44,765
 44,554
 
 44,554
Inventories78,185
 (311) 77,874
 83,408
 (310) 83,098
Income tax receivable170
 8
 178
 161
 7
 168
Prepaid expenses3,196
 
 3,196
 2,249
 
 2,249
Total current assets149,318
 261
 149,579
 151,117
 (43) 151,074
Property, plant and equipment, net104,798
 233
 105,031
 108,711
 233
 108,944
Goodwill and intangible assets, net13,902
 
 13,902
 14,270
 
 14,270
Other assets2,803
 2,074
 4,877
 2,846
 2,073
 4,919
Deferred income taxes1,005
 2
 1,007
 1,005
 2
 1,007
Total assets$271,826
 $2,570
 $274,396
 $277,949
 $2,265
 $280,214
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY           
Current liabilities:           
Accounts payable$39,818
 $
 $39,818
 $38,414
 $(268) $38,146
Accrued payroll expenses17,243
 1,282
 18,525
 14,888
 1,283
 16,171
Short-term borrowings under revolving credit facility25,971
 
 25,971
 33,398
 
 33,398
Short-term obligations under capital leases1,674
 
 1,674
 1,588
 
 1,588
Short-term derivative liability
 794
 794
 
 3,283
 3,283
Deferred income taxes500
 (24) 476
 500
 (24) 476
Other current liabilities10,183
 (5,907) 4,276
 12,495
 (8,432) 4,063
Total current liabilities95,389
 (3,855) 91,534
 101,283
 (4,158) 97,125
Accrued postretirement benefits24,352
 (5,180) 19,172
 23,911
 (4,884) 19,027
Other long-term liabilities—capital leases6,254
 
 6,254
 6,664
 
 6,664
Accrued pension liabilities22,495
 5,678
 28,173
 19,316
 5,677
 24,993
Accrued workers’ compensation liabilities3,624
 
 3,624
 3,639
 
 3,639
Deferred income taxes1,815
 27
 1,842
 1,815
 27
 1,842
Total liabilities$153,929
 $(3,330) $150,599
 $156,628
 $(3,338) $153,290
Commitments and contingencies           
Stockholders’ equity:           
Preferred stock, $1.00 par value, 500,000 shares authorized and none issued$
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
Common stock, $1.00 par value, 25,000,000 shares authorized; 16,261,723 and 16,186,852 issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2011 and September 30, 2011, respectively16,262
 
 16,262
 16,187
 
 16,187
Additional paid-in capital33,071
 
 33,071
 37,259
 
 37,259
Retained earnings118,089
 (66) 118,023
 122,200
 (363) 121,837

91

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

(In thousands, except share and per share data)December 31, 2011 September 30, 2011
 
Previously
Reported
 Adjustments (1) 
As
Restated
 
Previously
Reported
 Adjustments (1) 
As
Restated
Unearned ESOP shares(25,637)   (25,637) (30,437) 
 (30,437)
Less accumulated other comprehensive loss (income)(23,888) 5,966
 (17,922) (23,888) 5,966
 (17,922)
Total stockholders’ equity$117,897
 $5,900
 $123,797
 $121,321
 $5,603
 $126,924
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity$271,826
 $2,570
 $274,396
 $277,949
 $2,265
 $280,214
_______________ 
(1)For details see the introduction section included in Note 2.



92

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share data)Three Months Ended September 30, 2012 Three Months Ended September 30, 2011
 Previously Reported Adjustments (1) As Restated Previously Reported Adjustments (1) As Restated
Net sales$119,153
 $
 $119,153
 $121,197
 $
 $121,197
Cost of goods sold74,532
 
 74,532
 81,512
 
 81,512
Gross profit44,621
 
 44,621
 39,685
 
 39,685
Selling expenses37,271
 
 37,271
 35,681
 
 35,681
General and administrative expenses8,893
 (124) 8,769
 8,634
 (296) 8,338
Operating expenses46,164
 (124) 46,040
 44,315
 (296) 44,019
(Loss) income from operations(1,543) 124
 (1,419) (4,630) 296
 (4,334)
Other income (expense):           
Dividend income259
 
 259
 359
 
 359
Interest income92
 
 92
 15
 
 15
Interest expense(457) 
 (457) (575) 
 (575)
Other, net4,945
 
 4,945
 (2,407) 
 (2,407)
Total other income (expense)4,839
 
 4,839
 (2,608) 
 (2,608)
Income (loss) before taxes3,296
 124
 3,420
 (7,238) 296
 (6,942)
Income tax expense422
 19
 441
 346
 (8) 338
Net income (loss)$2,874
 $105
 $2,979
 $(7,584) $304
 $(7,280)
Net income (loss) per common share—basic and diluted$0.19
 

 $0.19
 $(0.50) 

 $(0.48)
Weighted average common shares outstanding—basic and diluted15,490
   15,490
 15,182
   15,182

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(In thousands)Three Months Ended September 30, 2012 Three Months Ended September 30, 2011
 Previously Reported Adjustments(1) As Restated Previously Reported Adjustments(1) As Restated
Net income (loss)$2,874
 $105
 $2,979
 $(7,584) $304
 $(7,280)
Other comprehensive income (loss):           
    Change in the funded status of retiree benefit obligations
 
 
 
 
 
Income tax (expense) benefit
 
 
 
 
 
Total comprehensive income (loss), net of tax$2,874
 $105
 $2,979
 $(7,584) $304
 $(7,280)
_______________ 
(1) See summary table of the impact of the restatement corrections and immaterial adjustments on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) included in Note 2.





93

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share data)Three Months Ended December 31, 2012 Six Months Ended December 31, 2012
 Previously Reported Adjustments (1) As Restated Previously Reported Adjustments (1) As Restated
Net sales$135,705
 $
 $135,705
 $254,858
 $
 $254,858
Cost of goods sold85,352
 
 85,352
 159,884
 
 159,884
Gross profit50,353
 
 50,353
 94,974
 
 94,974
Selling expenses40,765
 
 40,765
 78,036
 
 78,036
General and administrative expenses9,165
 (124) 9,041
 18,058
 (248) 17,810
Operating expenses49,930
 (124) 49,806
 96,094
 (248) 95,846
Income (loss) from operations423
 124
 547
 (1,120) 248
 (872)
Other income (expense):      

 

 
Dividend income284
 
 284
 543
 
 543
Interest income99
 
 99
 191
 
 191
Interest expense(463) 
 (463) (920) 
 (920)
Other, net(7,656) 
 (7,656) (2,711) 
 (2,711)
Total other expense(7,736) 
 (7,736) (2,897) 
 (2,897)
(Loss) income before taxes(7,313) 124
 (7,189) (4,017) 248
 (3,769)
Income tax (benefit) expense(19) (13) (32) 403
 6
 409
Net (loss) income$(7,294) $137
 $(7,157) $(4,420) $242
 $(4,178)
Net (loss) income per common share—basic and diluted$(0.47) 

 $(0.46) $(0.28) 

 $(0.27)
Weighted average common shares outstanding—basic and diluted15,548
 

 15,548
 15,520
 

 15,520

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(In thousands)Three Months Ended December 31, 2012 Six Months Ended December 31, 2012
 Previously Reported Adjustments(1) As Restated Previously Reported Adjustments(1) As Restated
Net (loss) income$(7,294) $137
 $(7,157) $(4,420) $242
 $(4,178)
Other comprehensive income (loss):           
    Change in the funded status of retiree benefit obligations
 
 
 
 
 
Income tax (expense) benefit
 
 
 
 
 
Total comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax$(7,294) $137
 $(7,157) $(4,420) $242
 $(4,178)
_______________ 
(1) See summary table of the impact of the restatement corrections and immaterial adjustments on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) included in Note 2.



94

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share data)Three Months Ended December 31, 2011 Six Months Ended December 31, 2011
 Previously Reported Adjustments (1) As Restated Previously Reported Adjustments (1) As Restated
Net sales$131,770
 $
 $131,770
 $252,967
 $
 $252,967
Cost of goods sold87,229
 
 87,229
 168,741
 
 168,741
Gross profit44,541
 
 44,541
 84,226
 
 84,226
Selling expenses36,771
 
 36,771
 72,452
 
 72,452
General and administrative expenses9,071
 (296) 8,775
 17,705
 (592) 17,113
Pension withdrawal expense4,348
 
 4,348
 4,348
 
 4,348
Operating expenses50,190
 (296) 49,894
 94,505
 (592) 93,913
(Loss) income from operations(5,649) 296
 (5,353) (10,279) 592
 (9,687)
Other income (expense):           
Dividend income304
 
 304
 663
 
 663
Interest income21
 
 21
 36
 
 36
Interest expense(506) 
 (506) (1,081) 
 (1,081)
Other, net1,780
 
 1,780
 (627) 
 (627)
Total other income (expense)1,599
 
 1,599
 (1,009) 
 (1,009)
(Loss) income before taxes(4,050) 296
 (3,754) (11,288) 592
 (10,696)
Income tax expense (benefit)60
 (1) 59
 406
 (9) 397
Net (loss) income$(4,110) $297
 $(3,813) $(11,694) $601
 $(11,093)
Net (loss) income per common share—basic and diluted$(0.27) 

 $(0.25) $(0.77) 

 $(0.73)
Weighted average common shares outstanding—basic and diluted15,247
   15,247
 15,215
   15,215

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(In thousands)Three Months Ended December 31, 2011 Six Months Ended December 31, 2011
 Previously Reported Adjustments(1) As Restated Previously Reported Adjustments(1) As Restated
Net (loss) income$(4,110) $297
 $(3,813) $(11,694) $601
 $(11,093)
Other comprehensive income (loss):           
    Change in the funded status of retiree benefit obligations
 
 
 
 
 
Income tax (expense) benefit
 
 
 
 
 
Total comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax$(4,110) $297
 $(3,813) $(11,694) $601
 $(11,093)
_______________ 
(1) See summary table of the impact of the restatement corrections and immaterial adjustments on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) included in Note 2.




95

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share data)Three Months Ended March 31, 2013 Nine Months Ended March 31, 2013
 Previously Reported Adjustments (1) As Restated Previously Reported Adjustments (1) As Restated
Net sales$126,343
 $
 $126,343
 $381,201
 $
 $381,201
Cost of goods sold77,668
 
 77,668
 237,552
 
 237,552
Gross profit48,675
 
 48,675
 143,649
 
 143,649
Selling expenses39,135
 
 39,135
 117,171
 
 117,171
General and administrative expenses10,159
 (125) 10,034
 28,217
 (373) 27,844
Operating expenses49,294
 (125) 49,169
 145,388
 (373) 145,015
(Loss) income from operations(619) 125
 (494) (1,739) 373
 (1,366)
Other income (expense):           
Dividend income286
 
 286
 829
 
 829
Interest income92
 
 92
 283
 
 283
Interest expense(466) 
 (466) (1,386) 
 (1,386)
Other, net(764) 
 (764) (3,475) 
 (3,475)
Total other expense(852) 
 (852) (3,749) 
 (3,749)
(Loss) income before taxes(1,471) 125
 (1,346) (5,488) 373
 (5,115)
Income tax (benefit) expense(56) 16
 (40) 347
 22
 369
Net (loss) income$(1,415) $109
 $(1,306) $(5,835) $351
 $(5,484)
Net (loss) income per common share—basic and diluted$(0.09) 

 $(0.08) $(0.38) 

 $(0.35)
Weighted average common shares outstanding—basic and diluted15,600
   15,600
 15,541
   15,541

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(In thousands)Three Months Ended March 31, 2013 Nine Months Ended March 31, 2013
 Previously Reported Adjustments(1) As Restated Previously Reported Adjustments(1) As Restated
Net income (loss)$(1,415) $109
 $(1,306) $(5,835) $351
 $(5,484)
Other comprehensive income (loss):           
    Change in the funded status of retiree benefit obligations
 
 
 
 
 
Income tax (expense) benefit
 
 
 
 
 
Total comprehensive income (loss), net of tax$(1,415) $109
 $(1,306) $(5,835) $351
 $(5,484)
_______________ 
(1) See summary table of the impact of the restatement corrections and immaterial adjustments on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) included in Note 2.





96

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands except per share data)Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 Nine Months Ended March 31, 2012
 Previously Reported Adjustments (1) As Restated Previously Reported Adjustments (1) As Restated
Net sales$121,527
 $
 $121,527
 $374,494
 $
 $374,494
Cost of goods sold78,380
 
 78,380
 247,121
 
 247,121
Gross profit43,147
 
 43,147
 127,373
 
 127,373
Selling expenses37,909
 
 37,909
 110,361
 
 110,361
General and administrative expenses9,345
 (295) 9,050
 27,050
 (887) 26,163
Pension withdrawal expense
 
 
 4,348
 
 4,348
Operating expenses47,254
 (295) 46,959
 141,759
 (887) 140,872
(Loss) income from operations(4,107) 295
 (3,812) (14,386) 887
 (13,499)
Other income (expense):           
Dividend income295
 
 295
 958
 
 958
Interest income63
 
 63
 99
 
 99
Interest expense(498) 
 (498) (1,579) 
 (1,579)
Other, net(1,831) 
 (1,831) (2,458) 
 (2,458)
Total other (expense) income(1,971) 
 (1,971) (2,980) 
 (2,980)
(Loss) income before taxes(6,078) 295
 (5,783) (17,366) 887
 (16,479)
Income tax (benefit) expense(577) 5
 (572) (171) (4) (175)
Net (loss) income$(5,501) $290
 $(5,211) $(17,195) $891
 $(16,304)
Net (loss) income per common share—basic and diluted$(0.35) 

 $(0.33) $(1.11) 

 $(1.06)
Weighted average common shares outstanding—basic and diluted15,592
   15,592
 15,449
   15,449

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(In thousands)Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 Nine Months Ended March 31, 2012
 Previously Reported Adjustments(1) As Restated Previously Reported Adjustments(1) As Restated
Net (loss) income$(5,501) $290
 $(5,211) $(17,195) $891
 $(16,304)
Other comprehensive (loss) income:           
    Change in the funded status of retiree benefit obligations           
Income tax (expense) benefit
 
 
 
 
 
Total comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax$(5,501) $290
 $(5,211) $(17,195) $891
 $(16,304)
_______________ 
(1) See summary table of the impact of the restatement corrections and immaterial adjustments on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) included in Note 2.





97

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share data)Three Months Ended June 30, 2012
 Previously Reported Adjustments (1) As Restated
Net sales$120,948
 $
 $120,948
Cost of goods sold75,497
 (78) 75,419
Gross profit45,451
 78
 45,529
Selling expenses40,280
 
 40,280
General and administrative expenses9,847
 (1,788) 8,059
Impairment losses on goodwill and intangible assets5,585
 
 5,585
Pension withdrawal expense220
 
 220
Operating expenses55,932
 (1,788) 54,144
Loss (income) from operations(10,481) 1,866
 (8,615)
Other income (expense):     
Dividend income273
 
 273
Interest income115
 
 115
Interest expense(558) 
 (558)
Other, net(1,659) 
 (1,659)
Total other expense(1,829) 
 (1,829)
(Loss) income before taxes(12,310) 1,866
 (10,444)
Income tax (benefit) expense(176) 4
 (172)
Net (loss) income(12,134) 1,862
 (10,272)
Net (loss) income per common share—basic and diluted$(0.77) 

 $(0.65)
Weighted average common shares outstanding—basic and diluted15,723
   15,723


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(In thousands)Three Months Ended June 30, 2012
 Previously Reported Adjustments(1) As Restated
Net (loss) income$(12,134) $1,862
 $(10,272)
Other comprehensive (loss) income:     
    Change in the funded status of retiree benefit obligations(33,341) 6,641
 (26,700)
Income tax (expense) benefit
 
 
Total comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax$(45,475) $8,503
 $(36,972)
_______________ 
(1) See summary table of the impact of the restatement corrections and immaterial adjustments on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) included in Note 2.



98

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)Three Months Ended September 30, 2012 Three Months Ended September 30, 2011
 Previously Reported Adjustments(1) As Restated Previously Reported Adjustments(1) As Restated
Cash flows from operating activities:           
Net loss$2,874
 $105
 $2,979
 $(7,584) $304
 $(7,280)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:           
Depreciation and amortization8,340
 
 8,340
 7,923
 
 7,923
(Recovery of) provision for doubtful accounts(922) 
 (922) 590
 
 590
Gain on sales of assets(3,213) 
 (3,213) 98
 
 98
ESOP and share-based compensation expense823
 
 823
 790
 
 790
Net gain on investments(802) 
 (802) 2,621
 
 2,621
Change in operating assets and liabilities:           
Restricted cash
 1,483
 1,483
 
 (168) (168)
Short-term investments1,232
 (1,180) 52
 6,059
 (92) 5,967
Accounts and notes receivable(1,481) 
 (1,481) (1,643) 
 (1,643)
Inventories(3,943) 
 (3,943) (3,192) 
 (3,192)
Income tax receivable374
 19
 393
 287
 (8) 279
Prepaid expenses and other assets120
 
 120
 543
 
 543
Accounts payable1,863
 405
 2,268
 (3,650) (190) (3,840)
Accrued payroll expenses and other liabilities(834) (708) (1,542) (147) 451
 304
Accrued postretirement benefits412
 (124) 288
 327
 (297) 30
Other long-term liabilities(1,191) 
 (1,191) (3,055) 
 (3,055)
Net cash provided by operating activities$3,652
 $
 $3,652
 $(33) $
 $(33)
Cash flows from investing activities:           
Purchases of property, plant and equipment(3,572) 
 (3,572) (2,910) 
 (2,910)
Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment3,786
 
 3,786
 198
 
 198
Net cash provided by investing activities$214
 $
 $214
 $(2,712) $
 $(2,712)
Cash flows from financing activities:           
Proceeds from revolving credit facility4,800
 
 4,800
 8,400
 
 8,400

99

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

(In thousands)Three Months Ended September 30, 2012 Three Months Ended September 30, 2011
 Previously Reported Adjustments(1) As Restated Previously Reported Adjustments(1) As Restated
Repayments on revolving credit facility(9,250) 
 (9,250) (6,800) 
 (6,800)
Payments of capital lease obligations(777) 
 (777) (384) 
 (384)
Net cash used in financing activities$(5,227) $
 $(5,227) $1,216
 $
 $1,216
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents$(1,361) $
 $(1,361) $(1,529) $
 $(1,529)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year3,906
 
 3,906
 6,081
 
 6,081
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year$2,545
 $
 $2,545
 $4,552
 $
 $4,552
_______________ 
(1)For details see the introduction section included in Note 2.


100

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)Six Months Ended December 31, 2012 Six Months Ended December 31, 2011
 Previously Reported Adjustments(1) As Restated Previously Reported Adjustments(1) As Restated
Cash flows from operating activities:           
Net loss$(4,420) $242
 $(4,178) $(11,694) $601
 $(11,093)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:           
Depreciation and amortization16,640
 
 16,640
 15,821
 
 15,821
(Recovery of) provision for doubtful accounts(963) 
 (963) 737
 
 737
Gain on sales of assets(3,202) 
 (3,202) (662) 
 (662)
ESOP and share-based compensation expense1,906
 
 1,906
 1,476
 
 1,476
Net loss on investments7,038
 
 7,038
 2,250
 
 2,250
Change in operating assets and liabilities:           
Restricted cash
 (1,987) (1,987) 
 (1,353) (1,353)
Short-term investments(6,587) (1,267) (7,854) 3,743
 789
 4,532
Accounts and notes receivable(2,053) 
 (2,053) (2,000) 
 (2,000)
Inventories(2,404) 
 (2,404) 1,110
 
 1,110
Income tax receivable284
 5
 289
 277
 (9) 268
Prepaid expenses and other assets558
 
 558
 (361) 
 (361)
Accounts payable4,615
 (730) 3,885
 (1,712) 51
 (1,661)
Accrued payroll expenses and other liabilities(605) 3,986
 3,381
 (165) 513
 348
Accrued postretirement benefits600
 (249) 351
 767
 (592) 175
Other long-term liabilities(1,302) 
 (1,302) 112
 
 112
Net cash provided by operating activities$10,105
 $
 $10,105
 $9,699
 $
 $9,699
Cash flows from investing activities:           
Purchases of property, plant and equipment(6,396) 
 (6,396) (5,808) 
 (5,808)
Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment3,911
 
 3,911
 1,227
 
 1,227
Net cash used in investing activities$(2,485) $
 $(2,485) $(4,581) $
 $(4,581)
Cash flows from financing activities:           
Proceeds from revolving credit facility15,000
 
 15,000
 9,400
 
 9,400
Repayments on revolving credit facility(19,750) 
 (19,750) (15,700) 
 (15,700)
Payments of capital lease obligations(1,558) 
 (1,558) (778) 
 (778)
Net cash used in financing activities$(6,308) $
 $(6,308) $(7,078) $
 $(7,078)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents$1,312
 $
 $1,312
 $(1,960) $
 $(1,960)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period3,906
 
 3,906
 6,081
 
 6,081

101

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

(In thousands)Six Months Ended December 31, 2012 Six Months Ended December 31, 2011
 Previously Reported Adjustments(1) As Restated Previously Reported Adjustments(1) As Restated
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$5,218
 $
 $5,218
 $4,121
 $
 $4,121
_______________ 
(1)For details see the introduction section included in Note 2.



102

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)Nine Months Ended March 31, 2013 Nine Months Ended March 31, 2012
 Previously Reported Adjustments(1) As Restated Previously Reported Adjustments(1) As Restated
Cash flows from operating activities:           
Net loss$(5,835) $351
 $(5,484) $(17,195) $891
 $(16,304)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:           
Depreciation and amortization24,778
 
 24,778
 23,831
 
 23,831
(Recovery of) provision for doubtful accounts(890) 
 (890) 880
 
 880
Deferred income taxes111
 
 111
 
 
 
Gain on sales of assets(4,388) 
 (4,388) (1,161) 
 (1,161)
ESOP and share-based compensation expense2,639
 
 2,639
 2,519
 
 2,519
Net loss on investments9,315
 
 9,315
 5,131
 
 5,131
Change in operating assets and liabilities:           
Restricted cash
 (2,140) (2,140) 
 (1,314) (1,314)
Short-term investments(9,063) (1,284) (10,347) 1,027
 (231) 796
Accounts and notes receivable(1,167) 
 (1,167) 936
 
 936
Inventories(1,291) 
 (1,291) 3,533
 
 3,533
Income tax receivable622
 23
 645
 (377) (4) (381)
Prepaid expenses and other assets522
   522
 81
 
 81
Accounts payable4,359
 (622) 3,737
 (9,342) 51
 (9,291)
Accrued payroll expenses and other liabilities(1,312) 4,046
 2,734
 1,102
 1,494
 2,596
Accrued postretirement benefits836
 (374) 462
 1,130
 (887) 243
Other long-term liabilities(1,416) 
 (1,416) (1,083) 
 (1,083)
Net cash provided by operating activities$17,820
 $
 $17,820
 $11,012
 $
 $11,012
Cash flows from investing activities:           
Purchases of property, plant and equipment(10,118) 
 (10,118) (10,533) 
 (10,533)
Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment5,556
 
 5,556
 2,112
 
 2,112
Net cash used in investing activities$(4,562) $
 $(4,562) $(8,421) $
 $(8,421)
Cash flows from financing activities:           
Proceeds from revolving credit facility22,550
 
 22,550
 13,700
 
 13,700
Repayments on revolving credit facility(32,771) 
 (32,771) (17,700) 
 (17,700)
Payments of capital lease obligations(2,613) 
 (2,613) (1,209) 
 (1,209)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options1,195
 
 1,195
 
 
 
Net cash used in financing activities$(11,639) $
 $(11,639) $(5,209) $
 $(5,209)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents$1,619
 $
 $1,619
 $(2,618) $
 $(2,618)

103

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

(In thousands)Nine Months Ended March 31, 2013 Nine Months Ended March 31, 2012
 Previously Reported Adjustments(1) As Restated Previously Reported Adjustments(1) As Restated
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period3,906
 
 3,906
 6,081
 
 6,081
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$5,525
 $
 $5,525
 $3,463
 $
 $3,463
_______________ 
(1)For details see the introduction section included in Note 2.




104


Item 9.Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None. 
Item 9A.Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Exchange Act, are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information we are required to disclose in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
As of June 30, 2013,2016, our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Exchange Act. Based onupon that evaluation, and as a result of the material weakness in internal control over financial reporting as set forth below, the Company'sour Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, the Company'sas of June 30, 2016, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of June 30, 2013. Our management's annual report on internal control over financial reporting is set forth below.are effective.
Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f). Internal control over financial reporting refers to the process designed by, or under the supervision of, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, and effected by our Board of Directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Due to its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risks that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with policies or procedures may deteriorate.
With the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, our management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework and criteria established in the 1992 "Internal2013 “Internal Control—Integrated Framework," issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based upon this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that as of June 30, 2013, our internal controls over financial reporting were not effective due to a material weakness in our controls over our accounting for postretirement benefit obligations.
A "material weakness" is defined as a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.
Aswas effective as of June 30, 2013, there was a material weakness in the Company's controls2016.
The effectiveness of our internal control over its accounting for andfinancial reporting of other postretirement benefit obligations. Specifically, our controls did not properly identify the failure to apply generally accepted accounting principles with respect to the accounting for death benefits and the related cash surrender value of life insurance, and did not properly detect when changes or amendments to other postretirement benefit plans occurred that should have resulted in changes to the related benefit plan obligations. As a result, material errors to the recorded postretirement benefit liability, postretirement death benefit liability and cash surrender value of life insurance purchased to fund the postretirement death benefit occurred and were not timely detected.
Ernsthas been audited by Deloitte & YoungTouche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, issued an attestation report on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2013, as stated in their report which is includedappears herein.
Remediation Efforts to Address Material Weakness
To remediate the material weakness described above, we are currently evaluating the controls and procedures we will design and put in place to address this material weakness and plan to implement appropriate measures as part of this effort. These controls and procedures may include:
engagement of independent consultants to review the Company's other postretirement benefit obligation controls and to make recommendations to address the design gaps in these controls;

105



retention of additional knowledgeable accounting personnel to review the accuracy of data and plan information provided to actuaries engaged to perform valuation services;
design of processes to facilitate improved interaction among human resources, external actuaries and accounting personnel; and
additional focused training of our finance personnel in the area of accounting and reporting for our other postretirement obligations, including any changes in the relevant accounting guidance and timely adoption thereof.
Any actions we have taken or may take to remediate this material weaknesss are subject to continued management review supported by testing, as well as oversight by the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors. We cannot assure you that material weaknesses or significant deficiencies will not occur in the future and that we will be able to remediate such weaknesses or deficiencies in a timely manner, which could impair our ability to accurately and timely report our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Except as described above, thereThere has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Exchange Act) during our fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2013,2016, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

106





Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Farmer Bros. Co. and Subsidiaries
Torrance, California

We have audited Farmer Bros. Co. and Subsidiaries'the internal control over financial reporting of Farmer Bros. Co. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of June 30, 2013,2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control-IntegratedControl - Integrated Framework (2013)issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (1992 framework) (the COSO criteria). Farmer Bros. Co. and SubsidiariesCommission. The Company's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management'sManagement’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company'sCompany's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company's principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company's board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of itsthe inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not preventbe prevented or detect misstatements.detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

AIn our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, inrespects, effective internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatementas of June 30, 2016, based on the criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013)issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the company's annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. The following material weakness has been identified and included in management's report on internal control over financial reporting. Management has identified a material weakness in the design and operation of the Company's controls over its accounting for and reporting of other postretirement benefit obligations. Treadway Commission.
We have also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Farmer Bros. Co. and Subsidiariesfinancial statements as of June 30, 2013 and 2012 (restated) and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), stockholders' equity and cash flows for the yearsyear ended June 30, 2013, June 30, 2012 (restated) and June 30, 2011 (restated). This material weakness was considered in determining the nature, timing and extent of audit tests applied in our audit2016 of the those financial statements,Company and this report does not affect our report dated October 9, 2013, whichSeptember 13, 2016 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.

In our opinion, because of the effect of the material weakness described above on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria, Farmer Bros. Co. and Subsidiaries has not maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2013, based on the COSO criteria.
/s/ ErnstDELOITTE & YoungTOUCHE LLP
Los Angeles, CaliforniaDallas, Texas
October 9, 2013September 13, 2016

107




Item 9B.Other Information
None.
PART III

Item 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
The information required by this item will be set forth in the Proxy Statement or Form 10-K/A and is incorporated in this report by reference.
Code of Conduct and Ethics
We maintain a written Code of Conduct and Ethics for all employees, officers and directors, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, and other persons performing similar functions. To view this Code of Conduct and Ethics free of charge, please visit our website at www.farmerbros.com (This website address is not intended to function as a hyperlink, and the information contained in our website is not intended to be a part of this filing). We intend to satisfy the disclosure requirements under Item 5.05 of Form 8-K regarding an amendment to, or waiver from, a provision of this Code of Conduct and Ethics, if any, by posting such information on our website as set forth above.
Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act
To the Company’s knowledge, based solely on a review of the copies of such reports furnished to the Company and written representations that no other reports were required during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013,2016, its officers, directors and ten percent stockholders complied with all applicable Section 16(a) filing requirements, except that, Michael H. Keown, the Company's President and Chief executive Officer, filed a late Form 4 in December 2015 reporting the sale of vested restricted shares to cover tax withholding requirements and with the exception of those filings listed in the Company's Proxy Statement expected to be dated and filed with the SEC not later than 120 days after the conclusion of the Company's fiscal year ended June 30, 2013. 2016.

Item 11.Executive Compensation
The information required by this item will be set forth in the Proxy Statement or Form 10-K/A and is incorporated in this report by reference. 



Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
The information required by this item will be set forth in the Proxy Statement or Form 10-K/A and is incorporated in this report by reference.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
Information about our equity compensation plans at June 30, 20132016 that were either approved or not approved by our stockholders was as follows:
 
Plan Category 
Number of
Shares to be
Issued Upon
Exercise of
Outstanding
Options
 
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price of
Outstanding
Options
 
Number of
Shares
Remaining
Available
for Future
Issuance(2)
 
Number of
Shares to be
Issued Upon
Exercise of
Outstanding
Options
 
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price of
Outstanding
Options
 
Number of
Shares
Remaining
Available
for Future
Issuance(2)
Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders(1) 557,427 $12.81 189,271 508,228 $20.66 151,857
Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders      
Total 557,427 $12.81 189,271 508,228 $20.66 151,857
________________
 
(1) Includes shares issued under the Amended Equity Plan and its predecessor plan, the Farmer Bros. Co. 2007 Omnibus Plan.
(2) Shares available for future issuance under the OmnibusAmended Equity Plan may be awarded in the form of performance-based stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock restricted stock units, dividend equivalents, performance-based awards, stock payments,another cash-based award or other incentivesincentive payable in shares of stock, or any combination thereof.cash. Shares covered by an award will be counted as used at the time the award is granted to a participant. If any award lapses, expires, terminates or is canceled prior to the issuance of shares thereunder or if shares are issued under the OmnibusAmended Equity Plan to a participant and are thereafter reacquired by the Company, the shares subject to such awards and the reacquired shares will again be available for issuance under the OmnibusAmended Equity Plan. In addition to the shares that are actually issued to a participant, the following items will be counted against the total number of shares available for issuance under the OmnibusAmended Equity Plan: (i) shares subject to an award that are not delivered to a participant because the award is exercised through a reduction of shares subject to the award (i.e., “net exercised”); (ii) shares subject to an award that are not delivered to a participant because such shares are withheld in satisfaction of the withholding of taxes incurred in connection with the exercise of or issuance of shares under certain types of awards; and (iii) shares that are tendered to the Company to pay the exercise price of any stock award.option. The following items will not be counted against the total number of shares available for issuance under the OmnibusAmended Equity Plan: (A) the payment in cash of dividends or dividend equivalents;dividends; and (B) any award that is settled in cash rather than by issuance of stock.


108




Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
The information required by this item will be set forth in the Proxy Statement or Form 10-K/A and is incorporated in this report by reference.
 
Item 14.Principal Accountant Fees and Services
The information required by this item will be set forth in the Proxy Statement or Form 10-K/A and is incorporated in this report by reference. 



PART IV

Item 15.Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
(a)List of Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules:

1. Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this report: 
 
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 20132016 and 2012 (as restated)2015
 
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended June 30, 2013, 2012 (as restated)2016, 2015 and 2011 (as restated)2014
 
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Years Ended June 30, 2013, 2012 (as restated)2016, 2015 and 2011 (as restated)2014
 
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended June 30, 2013, 2012 (as restated)2016, 2015 and 2011 (as restated)2014
 
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the Years Ended June 30, 2013, 2012 (as restated)2016, 2015 and 2011 (as restated)2014
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
2. Financial Statement Schedules: Financial Statement Schedules are omitted as they are not applicable, or the required information is given in the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto.
3. The exhibits to this Annual Report on Form 10-K are listed on the accompanying index to exhibits and are incorporated herein by reference or are filed as part of the Annual Report on Form 10-K. Each management contract or compensation plan required to be filed as an exhibit is identified by an asterisk (*).
 
(b)Exhibits: See Exhibit Index.

109

Item 16.Form 10-K Summary


None.




SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 
      
 
FARMER BROS. CO.
   
 By: 
/S/MICHAELs/Michael H. KEOWN
Keown
   Michael H. Keown
President and Chief Executive Officer
(chief executive officer)
Date: October 9, 2013
   September 13, 2016
 By: /s/MARK J. NELSON     Isaac N. Johnston, Jr.
   Mark J. NelsonIsaac N. Johnston, Jr.
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial and accounting officer)
Date: October 9, 2013
By:
/s/HORTENSIA R. GÓMEZ        
   Hortensia R. Gómez
Vice President and Controller
(controller)
Date: October 9, 2013September 13, 2016
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
 
     
   
/s/GUENTER W. BERGER Randy E. Clark Chairman of the Board and Director October 9, 2013September 13, 2016
Guenter W. Berger
/s/ HAMIDEH ASSADIDirectorOctober 9, 2013
   Hamideh AssadiRandy E. Clark    
     
/s/RANDY E. CLARK Guenter W. BergerChairman Emeritus and DirectorSeptember 13, 2016
Guenter W. Berger
/s/ Hamideh Assadi Director October 9, 2013September 13, 2016
Randy E. ClarkHamideh Assadi    
     
  Director  
Jeanne Farmer Grossman    
     
/s/MARTIN A. LYNCH Michael H. Keown Director October 9, 2013September 13, 2016
Martin A. LynchMichael H. Keown    
   
/s/JAMES J. MCGARRY Charles F. Marcy Director October 9, 2013September 13, 2016
James J. McGarryCharles F. Marcy    
   
/s/MICHAEL H. KEOWN Christopher P. Mottern Director October 9, 2013September 13, 2016
Michael H. KeownChristopher P. Mottern    



110




EXHIBIT INDEX
2.1Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 16, 2015, by and between Farmer Bros. Co. and Harris Spice Company Inc. (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 30, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference).*
3.1 
Certificate of Incorporation (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s QuarterlyCompany's Annual Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 200910-K filed with the SEC on May 11, 2009September 16, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference).

  
3.2 Amended and Restated Bylaws (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Current ReportQuarterly on Form 8-K10-Q filed with the SEC on April 25, 2011May 6, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference).
  
4.13.3 
Certificate of Designation, Preferences and Rights of Series A Junior Participating Preferred StockElimination (filed as Exhibit 4.13.3 to the Company’s Quarterly ReportCompany's Registration Statement on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 20108-A/A filed with the SEC on May 10, 2010September 24, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference).

  
4.2Rights Agreement, dated March 17, 2005, by and between Farmer Bros. Co. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Rights Agent (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 filed with the SEC on May 10, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
 
4.34.1 
Specimen Stock Certificate (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’sCompany's Registration Statement on Form 8-A/A filed with the SEC on February 6, 2009September 24, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference).

   
10.14.2 Amended and Restated Loan and Security
Registration Rights Agreement, dated September 12, 2011, by andas of June 16, 2016, among Farmer Bros. Co. and Coffee Bean International, Inc., as Borrowers, Coffee Bean Holding Co., Inc. and FBC Finance Company, as Guarantors, the Lenders partyInvestors identified on the signature pages thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Agent (filed as Exhibit 10.12 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011 filed with the SEC on September 12, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.2Amendment No. 1 to Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement, effective January 9, 2012, by and among Farmer Bros. Co. and Coffee Bean International, Inc., as Borrowers, Coffee Bean Holding Co., Inc. and FBC Finance Company, as Guarantors, the Lenders party thereto, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Agent (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2011 filed with the SEC on February 8, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.3Amendment No. 2 to Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of March 18, 2013, by and among Farmer Bros. Co. and Coffee Bean International, Inc., as Borrowers, Coffee Bean Holding Co., Inc. and FBC Finance Company, as Guarantors, the Lenders party thereto, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Agent (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 20, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.4
Letter Agreement regarding Waiver of Event of Default, dated October 3, 2013, by and among Farmer Bros. Co. and Coffee Bean International, Inc., as Borrowers, Coffee Bean Holding Co., Inc. and FBC Finance Company, as Guarantors, the Lenders party thereto, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Agent (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 4, 2013June 21, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference).

   
10.510.1 ISDA Master
Credit Agreement, dated as of November 19, 2012,March 2, 2015, by and betweenamong Farmer Bros. Co., Coffee Bean International, Inc., FBC Finance Company, Coffee Bean Holding Co., Inc., the Lenders party thereto and Wells FargoJPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed withfor the SEC on November 26, 2012period ended March 6, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference).

   
10.610.2 Schedule to the ISDA Master
Pledge and Security Agreement, dated as of November 19, 2012,March 2, 2015, by and betweenamong Farmer Bros. Co., Coffee Bean International, Inc., FBC Finance Company, Coffee Bean Holding Co., Inc. and Wells FargoJPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed withfor the SEC on November 26, 2012period ended March 6, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference).

   
10.710.3 Farmer Bros. Co. Pension Plan for Salaried Employees (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 filed with the SEC on November 5, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).**
   
10.810.4 Amendment No. 1 to Farmer Bros. Co. Retirement Plan effective June 30, 2011 (filed as Exhibit 10.14 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011 filed with the SEC on September 12, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference)herewith).**
   

111



10.910.5 
Action of the Administrative Committee of the Farmer Bros. Co. Qualified Employee Retirement Plans amending the Farmer Bros. Co. Retirement Plan, effective as of December 6, 2012 (filed as Exhibit 10.710.8 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013 filed with the SEC on May 6, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).**
10.6Farmer Bros. Co. 2005 Incentive Compensation Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.10 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 20122013 filed with the SEC on February 6, 201310, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference).*

*
  
10.1010.7 Amendment to Farmer Bros. Co. 2005 Incentive Compensation Plan (Amended and Restated as of December 31, 2008) (filed as Exhibit 10.410.1 to the Company’s QuarterlyCurrent Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 20088-K filed with the SEC on FebruaryDecember 10, 20092014 and incorporated herein by reference).**
  
10.1110.8 Farmer Bros. Co. Amended and Restated Employee Stock Ownership Plan, as adopted by the Board of Directors on December 9, 2010 and effective as of January 1, 2010 (filed as Exhibit 10.1210.8 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2010 filed with the SEC on February 9, 2011May 6, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference).**


10.1210.9 Action of the Administrative Committee of the Farmer Bros. Co. Qualified Employee Retirement Plans amending the Farmer Bros. Co. Amended and Restated Employee Stock Ownership Plan, effective as of January 1, 2012 (filed as Exhibit 10.7 to the Company’s QuarterlyAnnual Report on Form 10-Q10-K for the quarterfiscal year ended SeptemberJune 30, 2012 filed with the SEC on November 5,September 7, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).*
   
10.1310.10 Action of the Administrative Committee of the Farmer Bros. Co. Qualified Employee Retirement Plans amending the Farmer Bros. Co. Amended and Restated Employee Stock Ownership Plan, effective as of January 1, 2015 (filed as Exhibit 10.10 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2015 filed with the SEC on November 9, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference).**
10.11Action of the Administrative Committee of the Farmer Bros. Co. Qualified Employee Retirement Plans amending the Farmer Bros. Co. Amended and Restated Employee Stock Ownership Plan, effective as of January 1, 2015 ((filed as Exhibit 10.11 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2015 filed with the SEC on November 9, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference).**
10.12
ESOP Loan Agreement including ESOP Pledge Agreement and Promissory Note, dated March 28, 2000, between Farmer Bros. Co. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Trustee for the Farmer Bros Co. Employee Stock Ownership Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.1310.12 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2010 filed with the SEC on February 9, 2011May 6, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference).

  
10.1410.13 Amendment No. 1 to ESOP Loan Agreement, dated June 30, 2003, between Farmer Bros. Co. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Trustee for the Farmer Bros Co. Employee Stock Ownership Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.1410.13 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2010 filed with the SEC on February 9, 2011May 6, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference).
  
10.1510.14 ESOP Loan Agreement No. 2 including ESOP Pledge Agreement and Promissory Note, dated July 21, 2003 between Farmer Bros. Co. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Trustee for the Farmer Bros Co. Employee Stock Ownership Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.1510.14 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2010 filed with the SEC on February 9, 2011May 6, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference).
  
10.1610.15 Employment Agreement, dated March 9, 2012, by and between Farmer Bros. Co. and Michael H. Keown (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 13, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).*
10.17
Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, effective as of February 13, 2012, by and between
Farmer Bros. Co. and Jeffrey A. Wahba (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on February 17, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).*
10.18Consulting Services Agreement, effective as of March 1, 2013, between Farmer Bros. Co. and Jeffrey A. Wahba (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 28, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).*
   
10.19Letter Agreement by and between Farmer Bros. Co. and Jeffrey A. Wahba (filed as Exhibit 10.7 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 4, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).*
10.20
Employment Agreement, dated as of April 4, 2012, by and between Farmer Bros. Co. and Thomas W.
Mortensen (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed with the SEC on April
10, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).*
10.21
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, effective as of February 13, 2012, by and between Farmer
Bros. Co. and Patrick G. Criteser (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed
with the SEC on February 17, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).*

112





10.22Resignation Agreement, dated as of July 20, 2012, by and between Farmer Bros. Co. and Larry B. Garrett (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed with the SEC on July 24, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).*
10.2310.16 Employment Agreement, dated as of April 1, 2013, by and between Farmer Bros. Co. and Mark J. Nelson*Nelson (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 4, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).**
   
10.2410.17Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement, dated as of January 1, 2014, by and between Farmer Bros. Co. and Mark J. Nelson (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 5, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference).**
10.18Amendment No. 2 to Employment Agreement, dated as of November 23, 2015, between Farmer Bros. Co. and Mark J. Nelson (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 30, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference).**
10.19Employment Agreement, dated as of December 2, 2014, by and between Farmer Bros. Co. and Barry C. Fischetto (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 5, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference).**
10.20Employment Agreement, effective as of May 27, 2015, by and between Farmer Bros. Co. and Scott W. Bixby (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 20, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference).**


10.21
Employment Agreement, effective as of August 6, 2015, by and between Farmer Bros. Co. and Thomas J. Mattei, Jr. (filed as Exhibit 10.20 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on September 14, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference).**

10.22Separation Agreement, dated as of July 16, 2014, by and between Farmer Bros. Co. and Mark A. Harding (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 17, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference).**
10.23 Farmer Bros. Co. 2007 Omnibus Plan, as amended (as approved by the stockholders at the 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders on December 6, 2012) (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 12, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).**
10.24Farmer Bros. Co. Amended and Restated 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan (as approved by the stockholders at the 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders on December 5, 2013) (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 11, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).**
  
10.25 Addendum to Farmer Bros. Co. Amended and Restated 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.30 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on February 9, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference).**
10.26Form of Farmer Bros. Co. 2007 Omnibus Plan Stock Option Grant Notice and Stock Option Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 4, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).**
 
10.26Form of 2007 Omnibus Plan Restricted Stock Award Grant Notice and Restricted Stock Award Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 4, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).*
  
10.27 Stock Ownership Guidelines for Directors and Executive Officers (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 4, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference)herewith).**
  
10.28 Form of Award Letter (Fiscal 2012)2014) under Farmer Bros. Co. 2005 Incentive Compensation Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 24, 201217, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference).**
   
10.29 
Form of Target Award Notification Letter (Fiscal 2013)2015) under Farmer Bros. Co. 2005 Incentive Compensation Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.110.2 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 28, 201217, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference).**

  
10.30 Form of Change in Control Severance Agreement for Executive Officers of the Company (with schedule of executive officers attached) (filed as Exhibit 10.610.3 to the Company’sCompany's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 4, 2013September 29, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference).**
  
10.31 Form of Indemnification Agreement for Directors and Officers of the Company, as adopted on May 18, 2006 and as amended on December 31, 20085, 2013 (with schedule of indemnitees attached) (filed as Exhibit 10.510.2 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 4, 2013September 29, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference).**
10.32Lease Agreement, dated as of July 17, 2015, by and between Farmer Bros. Co. as Tenant, and WF-FB NLTX, LLC as Landlord (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 23, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.33First Amendment to Lease Agreement dated as of December 29, 2015, by and between Farmer Bros. Co. as Tenant, and WF-FB NLTX, LLC as Landlord (filed as Exhibit 10.36 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on May 6, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.34Amendment No. 2 to Lease Agreement dated as of March 10, 2016, by and between Farmer Bros. Co. as Tenant, and WF-FB NLTX, LLC as Landlord (filed as Exhibit 10.37 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on May 6, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference).


10.35Development Management Agreement dated as of July 17, 2015, by and between Farmer Bros. Co., as Tenant and Stream Realty Partners-DFW, L.P., as Developer (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 23, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.36First Amendment to Development Management Agreement dated as of January 1, 2016, by and between Farmer Bros. Co., as Tenant and Stream Realty Partners-DFW, L.P., as Developer (filed as Exhibit 10.39 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on May 6, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.37
Second Amendment to Development Management Agreement dated as of March 25, 2016, by and between Farmer Bros. Co., as Tenant and Stream Realty Partners-DFW, L.P., as Developer (filed as Exhibit 10.40 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on May 6, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference).

10.38Agreement of Purchase and Sale and Joint Escrow Instructions, dated as of April 11, 2016, by and between Farmer Bros. Co. as Seller, and Bridge Acquisition, LLC as Buyer (filed as Exhibit 10.41 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on May 6, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.39
First Amendment to Agreement of Purchase and Sale and Joint Escrow Instructions, dated as of June 1, 2016, by and between Farmer Bros. Co. and Bridge Acquisition, LLC (filed herewith).

   
14.1 Farmer Bros. Co. Code of Conduct and Ethics adopted on August 26, 2010 and updated February 2013 and September 7, 2016 (filed herewith).
   
21.1 List of all Subsidiaries of Farmer Bros. Co. (filed herewith).
   
23.1 Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (filed herewith).
   
31.1 Principal Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
  
31.2 Principal Financial and Accounting Officer Certification Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
  
32.1 Principal Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith).
  

113



32.2 Principal Financial and Accounting Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith).
  
99.1Properties List (filed herewith)
 
101 
The following financial statements from the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013,2016, formatted in eXtensible Business Reporting Language: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss), (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, (v) Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity, and (vi) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (furnished herewith).

________________
*Pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K, the schedules and/or exhibits to this agreement have been omitted. The Registrant undertakes to supplementally furnish copies of the omitted schedules and/or exhibits to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
**Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.




114106