UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
 
FORM 10-K
 
x    Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20142015
OR
¨    Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 1-183
 
THE HERSHEY COMPANY
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
    
Delaware23-0691590
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
  
100 Crystal A Drive, Hershey, PA17033
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)
  
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (717) 534-4200
  
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each className of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, one dollar par valueNew York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Title of class
Class B Common Stock, one dollar par value
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.   
Yes  x   No  ¨
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes  ¨    No  x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one)
        Large accelerated filer  x                                                                                Accelerated filer ¨
        Non-accelerated filer ¨                                                                                                        Smaller reporting company ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes  ¨    No  x
State
As of July 2, 2015 (the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter), the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter.
Common Stock, one dollar par value—$14,349,963,182 as of June 27, 2014.
Class B Common Stock, one dollar par value—$752,584 as of June 27, 2014. While the$13,110,173,681. Class B Common Stock is not listed for public trading on any exchange or market system,system. However, Class B shares of that class are convertible into shares of Common Stock at any time on a share-for-share basis. Determination of aggregate market value assumes all outstanding shares of Class B Common Stock were converted to Common Stock as of July 2, 2015. The market value indicated is calculated based on the closing price of the Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange on June 27, 2014.July 2, 2015 ($90.04 per share).

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock as of the latest practicable date.
Common Stock, one dollar par value—160,208,263155,899,924 shares, as of February 6, 2015.5, 2016.
Class B Common Stock, one dollar par value—60,619,777 shares, as of February 6, 2015.5, 2016.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Proxy Statement for the 20152016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of this report.



PART I
Item 1.BUSINESS
The Hershey Company was incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware on October 24, 1927 as a successor to a business founded in 1894 by Milton S. Hershey. In this report, the terms “Hershey,” “Company,” “we,” “us” or “our” mean The Hershey Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries and entities in which it has a controlling financial interest, unless the context indicates otherwise.
We are the largest producer of quality chocolate in North America and a global leader in chocolate and sugarnon-chocolate confectionery. We market, sell and distribute our products under more than 80 brand names in approximately 70 countries worldwide.
Reportable Segments
We operate under a matrix reportingOur organizational structure is designed to ensure continued focus on North America, coupled with an emphasis on accelerating growth in our focus international markets, as we continue to transform into a more global company. Our business is organized around geographic regions, and strategic business units. It is designed to enablewhich enables us to build processes for repeatable success in our global markets. The Presidents of our geographic regions, along with the Senior Vice President responsible for our Global Retail and Licensing business, are accountable for delivering our annual financial plans and report into our CEO, who serves as our Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”), so we have defined our operating segments on a geographic basis. Because ourOur North America business currently generates over 85%87% of our consolidated revenue and none of our other geographic regions areis individually significant,significant. Therefore, we have historically presented our business as one reportable segment. However, given the recent growth in our international business, combined with the September 2014 acquisition of Shanghai Golden Monkey, we have elected to begin reporting our operations within two segments, North America and International and Other, to provide additional transparency into our operations outside of North America. We have definedcurrently define our reportable segments as follows:
North America - This segment is responsible for our traditional chocolate and sugar confectionery market position, as well as our grocery and growing snacks market positions, in the United States and Canada. This includes developing and growing our business in chocolate sugarand non-chocolate confectionery, refreshment, snack, pantry, and food service and other snacking product lines.
International and Other - This segment includes all other countries where we currently manufacture, import, market, sell or distribute chocolate sugarand non-chocolate confectionery and other products. Currently, this includes our operations in China and other Asia markets, Latin America, Europe, Africa and the Middle East, along with exports to these regions. While a minorless significant component, this segment also includes our global retail operations, including Hershey’s Chocolate World stores in Hershey, Pennsylvania, New York City, Chicago, Las Vegas, Shanghai, Niagara Falls (Ontario), Dubai and Singapore, as well as operations associated with licensing the use of certain trademarks and products to third parties around the world.
Across our business, we also focus on growth within our three strategic business units - Chocolate, Sweets and Refreshments and Snacks and Adjacencies. These strategic business units focus on specific components of our product line and are responsible for building and leveraging the Company’s global brands and disseminating best demonstrated practices around the world. All of our products are marketed and distributed through our existing geographic go-to-market platforms.
Financial and other information regarding our reportable segments is provided in our Management’s Discussion and Analysis and Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Business Acquisitions and Divestitures
In March 2015, we completed the acquisition of all of the outstanding shares of KRAVE Pure Foods, Inc. (“Krave”), manufacturer of KRAVE jerky, a leading all-natural snack brand of premium jerky products. The transaction was undertaken to enable us to tap into the rapidly growing meat snacks category and further expand into the broader snacks space.
In September 2015, we acquired the non-controlling 49% interest in Hershey do Brasil, giving us 100% ownership of this business.
In September 2014, we completed the acquisition of 80% of the outstanding shares of Shanghai Golden Monkey Food Joint Stock Co., Ltd. (“SGM”), a confectionery company based in Shanghai, China. SGM operates through six production facilities located in China, and the Golden Monkeywhose product line is primarily sold through traditional trade channels. The acquisition was undertaken in order to leverage these traditional trade channels, which complement our traditional China chocolate business which is primarily distributed through Tier 1 or hypermarket channels. As discussed throughout 2015, SGM’s declining performance levels and the results of our assessment of the quality of SGM’s accounts receivables and existing distributor networks indicated the need to test the goodwill arising from the SGM acquisition for impairment and ultimately resulted in the recording of a $280.8

1


million impairment charge as of the end of the third quarter 2015. We are directing our efforts currently on developing an integration plan that is focused on the optimal structure for top-line growth. In the fourth quarter of 2015, we entered into an agreement redefining the terms of acquisition for the remaining 20% of SGM, which remained subject to regulatory approval as of year-end. We completed the purchase of the remaining 20% on February 3, 2016.
In 2014, we also acquired all of the outstanding shares of The Allan Candy Company Limited (“Allan”) headquartered in Ontario, Canada and a controlling interest in Lotte Shanghai Food Company, a joint venture established in 2007 in China for the purpose of manufacturing and selling product to the joint venture partners. These acquisitions provide us with additional manufacturing and distribution capacity to serve primarily the North America and Asia markets, respectively.
In January 2012,March 2015, we acquired allcompleted the sale of the outstanding stock of Brookside Foods Ltd.Mauna Loa Macadamia Nut Corporation (“Brookside”Mauna Loa”), a privately held confectionery company based in Abbottsford, British Columbia, Canada. As part of this transaction, we acquired two production facilities located in British Columbia and Quebec and expanded our product line to include Brookside’s chocolate covered, fruit-flavored confectionery products..
Products
Our principal confectionery offerings include chocolate and sugarnon-chocolate confectionery products; gum and mint refreshment products; pantry items, such as baking ingredients, toppings and beverages; and snack items such as spreads.spreads, meat snacks, bars and snack bites and mixes.
Within our North America markets, our product portfolio includes a wide variety of chocolate offerings marketed and sold under the renowned brands of Hershey’s, Reese’s, and Kisses, along with other popular chocolate and sugarnon-chocolate confectionery brands such as Jolly Rancher, Almond Joy, Brookside, Cadbury,Good & Plenty, Heath, Kit Kat, Lancaster, Payday, Rolo, Twizzlers, Whoppers and York. We also offer premium chocolate products, primarily in the U.S., through the Scharffen Berger and Dagoba brands. Our refreshmentgum and mint products includinginclude Ice Breakers mints and chewing gum, Breathsavers mints, and Bubble Yum bubble gum. Our pantry and snack items that are principally sold in North America include baking products and toppings and sundae syrups sold under the Hershey’s, Reese’s and Heath brands, as well as our new family of Hershey’s and Reese’s chocolate spreads.spreads and snack bites and mixes, Krave meat jerky products and Brookside fruit and nut bars.
Within our International and Other markets, we manufacture, market and sell many of these same brands, as well as other brands that are marketed regionally, such as Golden Monkey confectionery and snack products in China, Pelon Pelo Rico confectionery products in Mexico, IO-IO snack products in Brazil, and Nutrine and Maha Lacto confectionery products and Jumpin and Sofit beverage products in India.
Principal Customers and Marketing Strategy
Our customers are mainly wholesale distributors, chain grocery stores, mass merchandisers, chain drug stores, vending companies, wholesale clubs, convenience stores, dollar stores, concessionaires and department stores. The majority of our customers, with the exception of wholesale distributors, resell our products to end-consumers in retail outlets in North America and other locations worldwide.
In 2014,2015, approximately 25%26% of our consolidated net sales were made to McLane Company, Inc., one of the largest wholesale distributors in the United States to convenience stores, drug stores, wholesale clubs and mass merchandisers and the primary distributor of our products to Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
The foundation of our marketing strategy is our strong brand equities, product innovation and the consistently superior quality of our products. We devote considerable resources to the identification, development, testing, manufacturing and marketing of new products. We utilize a variety of promotional programs directed towards our customers, as well as advertising and promotional programs for consumers of our products, to stimulate sales of certain products at various times throughout the year.
In conjunction with our sales and marketing efforts, our efficient product distribution network helps us maintain sales growth and provide superior customer service. We plan optimum stock levels and work with our customers to set reasonable delivery times. Our distribution network provides forservice by facilitating the efficient shipment of our products from our manufacturing plants to strategically located distribution centers. We primarily use common carriers to deliver our products from these distribution points to our customers.

2


Raw Materials and Pricing
Cocoa products, including cocoa liquor, cocoa butter and cocoa powder processed from cocoa beans, are the most significant raw materials we use to produce our chocolate products. These cocoa products are purchased directly from third-party suppliers, who source cocoa beans that are grown principally in Far Eastern, West African, Central and South American equatorial regions. West Africa accounts for approximately 72%70% of the world’s supply of cocoa beans.
Adverse weather, crop disease, political unrest and other problems in cocoa-producing countries have caused price fluctuations in the past, but have never resulted in the total loss of a particular producing country’s cocoa crop and/or exports. In the event that a significant disruption occurs in any given country, we believe cocoa from other producing countries and from current physical cocoa stocks in consuming countries would provide a significant supply buffer.
We also use substantial quantities of sugar, Class II fluid dairy milk, peanuts, almonds and energy in our production process. Most of these inputs for our domestic and Canadian operations are purchased from suppliers in the United States. For our international operations, inputs not locally available may be imported from other countries.
We change prices and weights of our products when necessary to accommodate changes in input costs, the competitive environment and profit objectives, while at the same time maintaining consumer value. Price increases and weight changes help to offset increases in our input costs, including raw and packaging materials, fuel, utilities, transportation costs and employee benefits. When we implement price increases, as we did in July 2014 in North America, there is usually a time lag between the effective date of the list price increases and the impact of the price increases on net sales, in part because we typically honor previous commitments to planned consumer and customer promotions and merchandising events subsequent to the effective date of the price increases. In addition, promotional allowances may be increased subsequent to the effective date, delaying or partially offsetting the impact of price increases on net sales. 
Competition
Many of our brands enjoy wide consumer acceptance and are among the leading brands sold in the marketplace in North America and certain markets in Latin America. We sell our brands in highly competitive markets with many other global multinational, national, regional and local firms. Some of our competitors are large companies with significant resources and substantial international operations. Competition in our product categories is based on product innovation, product quality, price, brand recognition and loyalty, effectiveness of marketing and promotional activity, the ability to identify and satisfy consumer preferences, as well as convenience and service.
Seasonality and Backlog
Our sales are typically higher during the third and fourth quarters of the year, representing seasonal and holiday-related sales patterns. We manufacture primarily for stock and typically fill customer orders within a few days of receipt. Therefore, the backlog of any unfilled orders is not material to our total annual sales.
Trademarks, Service Marks and License Agreements
We own various registered and unregistered trademarks and service marks. The trademarks covering our key product brands are of material importance to our business. We follow a practice of seeking trademark protection in the U.S. and other key international markets where our products are sold. We also grant trademark licenses to third parties to produce and sell pantry items, flavored milks and various other products primarily under the Hershey’s and Reese’s brand names.

3


Furthermore, we have rights under license agreements with several companies to manufacture and/or sell and distribute certain products. Our rights under these agreements are extendible on a long-term basis at our option. Our most significant licensing agreements are as follows:
Company Brand Location Requirements
     
Kraft Foods Ireland Intellectual Property Limited 
York
Peter Paul Almond Joy
Peter Paul Mounds
 Worldwide None
Cadbury UK Limited 
Cadbury
Caramello
 United States Minimum sales requirement exceeded in 20142015
     
Société des
Produits Nestlé SA		 
Kit Kat
Rolo
 United States Minimum unit volume sales exceeded in 20142015
     
Huhtamäki Oy affiliate 
Good & Plenty
Heath
Jolly Rancher
Milk Duds
Payday
Whoppers
 Worldwide None
Research and Development
We engage in a variety of research and development activities in a number of countries, including the United States, Mexico, Brazil, India and China. We develop new products, improve the quality of existing products, improve and modernize production processes, and develop and implement new technologies to enhance the quality and value of both current and proposed product lines. Information concerning our research and development expense is contained in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Food Quality and Safety Regulation
The manufacture and sale of consumer food products is highly regulated. In the United States, our activities are subject to regulation by various government agencies, including the Food and Drug Administration, the Department of Agriculture, the Federal Trade Commission, the Department of Commerce and the Environmental Protection Agency, as well as various state and local agencies. Similar agencies also regulate our businesses outside of the United States.
We believe our Product Excellence Program provides us with an effective product quality and safety program. This program is integral to our global supply chain platform and is intended to ensure that all products we purchase, manufacture and distribute are safe, are of high quality and comply with applicable laws and regulations.
Through our Product Excellence Program, we evaluate the supply chain including ingredients, packaging, processes, products, distribution and the environment to determine where product quality and safety controls are necessary. We identify risks and establish controls intended to ensure product quality and safety. Various government agencies and third-party firms as well as our quality assurance staff conduct audits of all facilities that manufacture our products to assure effectiveness and compliance with our program and applicable laws and regulations.
Environmental Considerations
We mademake routine operating and capital expenditures during 2014 to comply with environmental laws and regulations. These annual expenditures wereare not material with respect to our results of operations, capital expenditures or competitive position.

4


Employees
As of December 31, 2014,2015, we employed approximately 20,80019,060 full-time and 1,650 part-time employees worldwide. Our employee headcount has increased compared to prior years due mainly to recent acquisitions, most notably SGM. Collective bargaining agreements covered approximately 5,7505,930 employees. During 2015,2016, agreements are expected towill be negotiated for certain employees at four facilities outside of the United States, comprising approximately 64%73% of total employees under collective bargaining agreements. We believe that our employee relations are generally good.
Financial Information by Geographic Area
Our principal operations and markets are located in the United States. The percentage of total consolidated net sales for our businesses outside of the United States was 17.5%17.2% for 2015, 19.2% for 2014 16.6%and 18.4% for 2013 and 16.2% for 2012.2013. The percentage of total consolidatedlong-lived assets outside of the United States was 35.4%31.8% as of December 31, 20142015 and 19.4%31.3% as of December 31, 2013.2014.
Corporate Social Responsibility
Our founder, Milton S. Hershey, established an enduring model of responsible citizenship while creating a successful business.  Driving sustainable business practices, making a difference in our communities, and operating with the highest integrity are vital parts of our heritage.  Milton Hershey School, established by Milton and Catherine Hershey, lies at the center of our unique heritage. Mr. Hershey donated and bequeathed almost his entire fortune to Milton Hershey School, which remains our primary beneficiary and provides a world-class education and nurturing home to nearly 2,000 children in need annually. We continue Milton Hershey'sthis legacy of commitment to consumers, community and childrentoday by providing high-qualityhigh quality products while conducting our business in a socially responsible and environmentally sustainable manner.
In 2014, Each year we published our thirdpublish a full corporate social responsibility (“CSR”) report which providedprovides an update on the progress we have made in advancing theour CSR priorities that were discussed in our last CSR report. The report outlined how we performed against the identified performance indicators and unveiledsuch as food safety, responsible sourcing of ingredients, corporate transparency, our new CSR framework, titled Shared Goodness.focus on improving basic nutrition to help children learn and grow and our continued investment in the communities where we live and work.
The safety and health of our employees, and the safety and quality of our products, are at the core of our operations and are areas of ongoing focus. Our over-arching safety goal is to consistently achieve best in class safety performance. We continue to invest in our quality management systems to ensure that product quality and food safety remain top priorities. We carefully monitor and rigorously enforce our high standards of excellence for superior quality, consistency, taste and food safety.
In 2014,2015, Hershey wasefforts were again recognized for its environmental, social, and governance performance by being named to both the Dow Jones Sustainability World Index and the North America Index. Hershey isThe company was also honored as one of only 13 companies from the Food, BeverageCorporate Responsibility magazine’s 100 Best Corporate Citizens, and Tobacco Industry recognized in the Dow Jones Sustainability World Index and ranked in at least the 90th percentile in this evaluation of economic, environmental and social criteria. The Dow Jones Sustainability World Index tracks the performance of the top 10% of the 2,500 largest companies in the S&P Global Broad Market Index that lead the field in terms of sustainability.
We have committed to minimizing our impact on the environment, regularly reviewing the ways in which we manage our operations and secure our supply of raw materials. Eleven of our facilities, including six manufacturing sites, have achieved zero-waste-to-landfill status. At the beginning of 2014, we reset our environmental goals, as we had achieved many of them ahead of schedule. We now have goals to reduce our environmental impact through efforts such as reducing waste, increasing recycling rates and using water more efficiently.
We focus on promoting fair and ethical business dealings. A condition of doing business with us is compliance with our Supplier Code of Conduct, which outlines our expectations with regard to our suppliers' commitment to legal compliance and business integrity, social and working conditions, food safety and the environment.
We continue our leadership role in supporting programs to improve the lives of cocoa farming families through a variety of initiatives. In 2014, we announced our role as a founding member of CocoaAction, a new strategy to align2015 World’s Most Ethical Company® by the cocoa sustainability efforts of the world’s largest cocoaEthisphere Institute. To learn more about our goals, progress and chocolate companies. This new level of coordination and commitment seeks to build a rejuvenated and economically viable cocoa sector forinitiatives, you can access our full CSR report at least 300,000 cocoa farmers

5


in Cote d’Ivoire and Ghana by 2020. Our 21st Century Cocoa Strategy aims to impact more than two million West Africans by 2017 through public/private programs as well as through Hershey initiatives, including CocoaLink, a first-of-its kind approach that uses mobile technology to deliver practical information on agricultural and social programs to rural cocoa farmers. It is our goal to source 100% certified cocoa for our global chocolate product lines by 2020, assuming adequate supply. We are progressing ahead of schedule as during 2014, 30% of the cocoa we sourced globally was certified. Our active engagement and financial support also continues for the World Cocoa Foundation and the International Cocoa Initiative.
Our employees share their time and resources generously in their communities. Both directly and through the United Way, we contribute to hundreds of agencies that deliver much needed services and resources. In 2014, Hershey donated more than $8 million in cash and product to worthy causes, including more than $3 million through our United Way Campaign. In 2014, we expanded our annual week of volunteerism, Good to Give Back Week, around the world. More than 1,700 employees volunteered with a variety of causes, and over 600 employees in Hershey, Pennsylvania partnered with the nonprofit Stop Hunger Now to pack 210,000 meals for families in need.
Our Company was founded on an enduring social mission – helping children in need. In North America, we are proud of our Project Fellowship program where employees partner with student homes at the Milton Hershey School, and our longstanding partnership with Children’s Miracle Network Hospitals. Around the world our employees are supporting local programs, such as an orphanage for special needs children in the Philippines and a children's burn center in Guadalajara, Mexico.
We have also initiated efforts to align our global citizenship priorities with our business expertise in manufacturing high quality food. We are working with the non-profit organization Project Peanut Butter to advance the treatment of severe malnutrition, the single largest cause of child death in the world today, through the production of locally produced, peanut-based, ready-to-use therapeutic foods. Hershey has sponsored a new manufacturing facility and feeding clinic and donated significant employee time and expertise to expand this program to Ghana.
Our commitment to CSR is yielding powerful results. As we expand into new markets and build upon our leadership in North America, we are convinced that our values and heritage will be fundamental to our continuing success.www.thehersheycompany.com/social-responsibility.aspx.
Available Information
The Company's website address is www.thehersheycompany.com. We file or furnish annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). You may obtain a copy of any of these reports, free of charge, from the Investors section of our website as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC. The SEC maintains an Internet site that also contains these reports at: www.sec.gov. In addition, copies of the Company's annual report will be made available, free of charge, on written request to the Company.
We have a Code of Ethical Business Conduct that applies to our Board of Directors (“Board”) and all Company officers and employees, including, without limitation, our Chief Executive Officer and “senior financial officers” (including the Interim PrincipalChief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer and persons performing similar functions). You can obtain a copy of our Code of Ethical Business Conduct, as well as our Corporate Governance Guidelines and charters for each of the Board’s standing committees, from the Investors section of our website. If we change or waive any portion of the Code of Ethical Business Conduct that applies to any of our directors, executive officers or senior financial officers, we will post that information on our website.




65


Item 1A.RISK FACTORS

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This Annual Report on Form 10-K, including the exhibits hereto and the information incorporated by reference herein, contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which are subject to risks and uncertainties. Other than statements of historical fact, information regarding activities, events and developments that we expect or anticipate will or may occur in the future, including, but not limited to, information relating to our future growth and profitability targets and strategies designed to increase total shareholder value, are forward-looking statements based on management’s estimates, assumptions and projections. Forward-looking statements also include, but are not limited to, statements regarding our future economic and financial condition and results of operations, the plans and objectives of management and our assumptions regarding our performance and such plans and objectives. Many of the forward-looking statements contained in this document may be identified by the use of words such as “intend,” “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “should,” “planned,” “projected,” “estimated” and “potential,” among others. Forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are predictions only and actual results could differ materially from management’s expectations due to a variety of factors, including those described below. All forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons working on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by such risk factors. The forward-looking statements that we make in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are based on management’s current views and assumptions regarding future events and speak only as of their dates. We assume no obligation to update developments of these risk factors or to announce publicly any revisions to any of the forward-looking statements that we make, or to make corrections to reflect future events or developments, except as required by the federal securities laws.
Issues or concerns related to the quality and safety of our products, ingredients or packaging could cause a product recall and/or result in harm to the Company’s reputation, negatively impacting our operating results.
In order to sell our iconic, branded products, we need to maintain a good reputation with our customers and consumers. Issues related to the quality and safety of our products, ingredients or packaging could jeopardize our Company’s image and reputation. Negative publicity related to these types of concerns, or related to product contamination or product tampering, whether valid or not, could decrease demand for our products or cause production and delivery disruptions. We may need to recall products if any of our products become unfit for consumption. In addition, we could potentially be subject to litigation or government actions, which could result in payments of fines or damages. Costs associated with these potential actions could negatively affect our operating results.
Increases in raw material and energy costs along with the availability of adequate supplies of raw materials could affect future financial results.
We use many different commodities for our business, including cocoa products, sugar, dairy products, peanuts, almonds, corn sweeteners, natural gas and fuel oil.
Commodities are subject to price volatility and changes in supply caused by numerous factors, including:
ŸCommodity market fluctuations;
ŸCurrency exchange rates;
ŸImbalances between supply and demand;
ŸThe effect of weather on crop yield;
ŸSpeculative influences;
ŸTrade agreements among producing and consuming nations;
ŸSupplier compliance with commitments;
ŸPolitical unrest in producing countries; and
ŸChanges in governmental agricultural programs and energy policies.
Although we use forward contracts and commodity futures and options contracts where possible to hedge commodity prices, commodity price increases ultimately result in corresponding increases in our raw material and energy costs. If

76


we are unable to offset cost increases for major raw materials and energy, there could be a negative impact on our financial condition and results of operations.
Price increases may not be sufficient to offset cost increases and maintain profitability or may result in sales volume declines associated with pricing elasticity.
We may be able to pass some or all raw material, energy and other input cost increases to customers by increasing the selling prices of our products or decreasing the size of our products; however, higher product prices or decreased product sizes may also result in a reduction in sales volume and/or consumption. If we are not able to increase our selling prices or reduce product sizes sufficiently, or in a timely manner, to offset increased raw material, energy or other input costs, including packaging, direct labor, overhead and employee benefits, or if our sales volume decreases significantly, there could be a negative impact on our financial condition and results of operations.
In North America, we announced a weighted average price increase in July 2014 of approximately 8% across our instant consumable, multi-pack, packaged candy and grocery lines to help offset part of the significant increases in our input costs, including raw materials, packaging, fuel, utilities and transportation, which we expect to incur in the future. While the increase was effective immediately, direct buying customers were given an opportunity to purchase transitional amounts of product at price points prior to the increase during the immediately following four-week period, and the increase is not expected to benefit seasonal sales until Halloween 2015. Accordingly, we expect that the majority of the financial benefit from this pricing action will impact earnings in 2015.
Market demand for new and existing products could decline.
We operate in highly competitive markets and rely on continued demand for our products. To generate revenues and profits, we must sell products that appeal to our customers and to consumers. Our continued success is impacted by many factors, including the following:
ŸEffective retail execution;
ŸAppropriate advertising campaigns and marketing programs;
ŸOur ability to secure adequate shelf space at retail locations;
ŸOur ability to drive innovation and maintain a strong pipeline of new products in the confectionery and broader snacking categories;
ŸChanges in product category consumption;
ŸOur response to consumer demographics and trends;trends, including trends relating to store trips and the impact of the growing e-commerce channel; and
ŸConsumer health concerns, including obesity and the consumption of certain ingredients.
There continuecontinues to be competitive product and pricing pressures in thesethe markets where we operate, as well as challenges in maintaining profit margins. We must maintain mutually beneficial relationships with our key customers, including retailers and distributors, to compete effectively. Our largest customer, McLane Company, Inc., accounted for approximately 25%26% of our total net sales in 2014.2015. McLane Company, Inc. is one of the largest wholesale distributors in the United States to convenience stores, drug stores, wholesale clubs and mass merchandisers, including Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Increased marketplace competition could hurt our business.
The global confectionery packaged goods industry is intensely competitive and consolidation in this industry continues. Some of our competitors are large companies that have significant resources and substantial international operations. In 2014, we also experiencedWe continue to experience increased levels of in-store activity for other snack items, which pressured confectionery category growth. In order to protect our existing market share or capture increased market share in this highly competitive retail environment, we may be required to increase expenditures for promotions and advertising, and must continue to introduce and establish new products. Due to inherent risks in the marketplace associated with advertising and new product introductions, including uncertainties about trade and consumer acceptance, increased expenditures may not prove successful in maintaining or enhancing our market share and could result in lower sales and profits. In addition, we may incur increased credit and other business risks because we operate in a highly competitive retail environment.

8


Disruption to our manufacturing operations or supply chain could impair our ability to produce or deliver finished products, resulting in a negative impact on our operating results.
Approximately two-thirds of our manufacturing capacity is located in the United States. Disruption to our global manufacturing operations or our supply chain could result from, among other factors, the following:

7


ŸNatural disaster;
ŸPandemic outbreak of disease;
ŸWeather;
ŸFire or explosion;
ŸTerrorism or other acts of violence;
ŸLabor strikes or other labor activities;
ŸUnavailability of raw or packaging materials; and
ŸOperational and/or financial instability of key suppliers, and other vendors or service providers.
We believe that we take adequate precautions to mitigate the impact of possible disruptions. We have strategies and plans in place to manage disruptive events if they were to occur, including our global supply chain strategies and our principle-based global labor relations strategy. If we are unable, or find that it is not financially feasible, to effectively plan for or mitigate the potential impacts of such disruptive events on our manufacturing operations or supply chain, our financial condition and results of operations could be negatively impacted if such events were to occur.
Our financial results may be adversely impacted by the failure to successfully execute or integrate acquisitions, divestitures and joint ventures.
From time to time, we may evaluate potential acquisitions, divestitures or joint ventures that align with our strategic objectives. The success of such activity depends, in part, upon our ability to identify suitable buyers, sellers or business partners; perform effective assessments prior to contract execution; negotiate contract terms; and, if applicable, obtain government approval. These activities may present certain financial, managerial, staffing and talent, and operational risks, including diversion of management’s attention from existing core businesses; difficulties integrating or separating businesses from existing operations; and challenges presented by acquisitions or joint ventures which may not achieve sales levels and profitability that justify the investments made. If the acquisitions, divestitures or joint ventures are not successfully implemented or completed, there could be a negative impact on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
During 2015, we faced a number of challenges in connection with the ongoing integration of SGM. Since its acquisition in 2014, the SGM business has performed below expectations, with net sales and earnings well below pre-acquisition levels. In addition, issues with the quality of SGM’s accounts receivables and existing distributor networks have affected our ability to fully realize many of the acquisition benefits that we believe will help accelerate our growth in China and enhance our ability to serve Chinese consumers. As a result of SGM's poor performance and these other contributing factors, in the second and third quarters of 2015 we recorded a goodwill write-down of approximately $266 million, representing all of the goodwill relating to the SGM reporting unit. While we believe we have appropriate strategies in place that will allow us to accelerate the SGM integration in 2016, additional challenges that impede further integration could jeopardize our growth strategy in China and could have a negative impact on the results of operations and cash flows of our International and Other reportable segment.
Changes in governmental laws and regulations could increase our costs and liabilities or impact demand for our products.
Changes in laws and regulations and the manner in which they are interpreted or applied may alter our business environment. These negative impacts could result from changes in food and drug laws, laws related to advertising and marketing practices, accounting standards, taxation requirements, competition laws, employment laws and environmental laws, among others. It is possible that we could become subject to additional liabilities in the future resulting from changes in laws and regulations that could result in an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Political, economic and/or financial market conditions could negatively impact our financial results.
Our operations are impacted by consumer spending levels and impulse purchases which are affected by general macroeconomic conditions, consumer confidence, employment levels, the availability of consumer credit and interest rates on that credit, consumer debt levels, energy costs and other factors. Volatility in food and energy costs, sustained

8


global recessions, rising unemployment and declines in personal spending could adversely impact our revenues, profitability and financial condition.
Changes in financial market conditions may make it difficult to access credit markets on commercially acceptable terms, which may reduce liquidity or increase borrowing costs for our Company, our customers and our suppliers. A significant reduction in liquidity could increase counterparty risk associated with certain suppliers and service

9


providers, resulting in disruption to our supply chain and/or higher costs, and could impact our customers, resulting in a reduction in our revenue, or a possible increase in bad debt expense.
Our expanding international operations may not achieve projected growth objectives, which could adversely impact our overall business and results of operations.
In 2014,2015, we derived approximately 18%17% of our net sales from customers located outside of the United States, versus 17%19% in 20132014 and 16%18% in 2012.2013. Additionally, 35%approximately 32% of our total consolidatedlong-lived assets were located outside of the United States as of December 31, 2014.2015. As part of our global growth strategy, we are increasing ourhave made investments outside of the United States, particularly inChina and Asia, Mexico Brazil, India and China.Brazil. As a result, we are subject to risks and uncertainties relating to international sales and operations, including:
ŸUnforeseen global economic and environmental changes resulting in business interruption, supply constraints, inflation, deflation or decreased demand;
ŸInability to establish, develop and achieve market acceptance of our global brands in international markets;
ŸDifficulties and costs associated with compliance and enforcement of remedies under a wide variety of complex laws, treaties and regulations;
ŸUnexpected changes in regulatory environments;
ŸPolitical and economic instability, including the possibility of civil unrest, terrorism, mass violence or armed conflict;
ŸNationalization of our properties by foreign governments;
ŸTax rates that may exceed those in the United States and earnings that may be subject to withholding requirements and incremental taxes upon repatriation;
ŸPotentially negative consequences from changes in tax laws;
ŸThe imposition of tariffs, quotas, trade barriers, other trade protection measures and import or export licensing requirements;
ŸIncreased costs, disruptions in shipping or reduced availability of freight transportation;
ŸThe impact of currency exchange rate fluctuations between the U.S. dollar and foreign currencies;
ŸFailure to gain sufficient profitable scale in certain international markets resulting in an inability to cover manufacturing fixed costs or resulting in losses from impairment or sale of assets; and
ŸFailure to recruit, retain and build a talented and engaged global workforce.
If we are not able to achieve our projected international growth objectives and mitigate the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with our international operations, there could be a negative impact on our financial condition and results of operations.
Disruptions, failures or security breaches of our information technology infrastructure could have a negative impact on our operations.
Information technology is critically important to our business operations. We use information technology to manage all business processes including manufacturing, financial, logistics, sales, marketing and administrative functions. These processes collect, interpret and distribute business data and communicate internally and externally with employees, suppliers, customers and others.
We invest in industry standard security technology to protect the Company’s data and business processes against risk of data security breach and cyber attack. Our data security management program includes identity, trust, vulnerability and threat management business processes as well as adoption of standard data protection policies. We measure our data security effectiveness through industry accepted methods and remediate significant findings. Additionally, we certify our major technology suppliers and any outsourced services through accepted security certification standards.

9


We maintain and routinely test backup systems and disaster recovery, along with external network security penetration testing by an independent third party as part of our business continuity preparedness. We also have processes in place to prevent disruptions resulting from the implementation of new software and systems of the latest technology.
While we believe that our security technology and processes provide adequate measures of protection against security breaches and in reducing cybersecurity risks, disruptions in or failures of information technology systems are possible

10


and could have a negative impact on our operations or business reputation. Failure of our systems, including failures due to cyber attacks that would prevent the ability of systems to function as intended, could cause transaction errors, loss of customers and sales, and could have negative consequences to our Company, our employees, and those with whom we do business.
Future developmentsWe might not be able to hire, engage and retain the talented global workforce we need to drive our growth strategies.
Our people continue to be our most important asset, and our future success depends upon our ability to identify, hire, develop, engage and retain talented personnel across the globe. Competition for global talent is intense, and we might not be able to identify and hire the personnel we need to continue to evolve and grow our business. In particular, if we are unable to hire the right individuals to fill the new senior management positions created as a result of the productivity initiative we announced in June 2015, our business performance may be impacted.
Activities related to civil antitrust lawsuitsidentifying, recruiting, hiring and integrating qualified individuals require significant time and attention. We may also need to invest significant amounts of cash and equity to attract talented new employees, and we may never realize returns on these investments.
In addition to hiring new employees, we must continue to focus on retaining and engaging the possible investigation by government regulators of alleged pricing practices by members of the confectionery industrytalented individuals we need to sustain our core business and lead our developing businesses into new markets, channels and categories. This may require significant investments in the United States could negatively impact our reputation and our operating results.
We are a defendant in a number of civil antitrust lawsuits in the United States, including individual, class and putative class actions brought against us by purchasers of our products. The U.S. Department of Justice also notified the Company in 2007 that it had opened an inquiry into certain alleged pricing practices by members of the confectionery industry, but has not requested any information or documents. Additional information about these proceedings is contained in Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Competition and antitrust law investigations can be lengthy and violators are subject to civil and/or criminal finestraining, coaching and other sanctions. Class action civil antitrust lawsuits are expensive to defendcareer development and could result in significant judgments, including in some cases, payment of treble damages and/or attorneys' fees to the successful plaintiff. Additionally, negative publicity involving these proceedings could affect our Company's brands and reputation, possibly resulting in decreased demand for our products. These possible consequences, in our opinion, currentlyretention activities. If we are not expectedable to materiallyeffectively retain and grow our talent, our ability to achieve our strategic objectives will be adversely affected, which may impact our financial position or liquidity, but could materially impact ourcondition and results of operations and cash flows in the period in which any fines, settlements or judgments are accrued or paid, respectively.operations.
Item 1B.
UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.  

10


Item 2.
PROPERTIES
Our principal properties include the following:
Country Location Type 
Status
(Own/Lease)
United States 
Hershey, Pennsylvania
(2 principal plants)
 Manufacturing—confectionery products and pantry items Own
  Lancaster, Pennsylvania Manufacturing—confectionery products Own
  Robinson, Illinois Manufacturing—confectionery products, and pantry items Own
  Stuarts Draft, Virginia Manufacturing—confectionery products and pantry items Own
  Edwardsville, Illinois Distribution Own
  Palmyra, Pennsylvania Distribution Own
  Ogden, Utah Distribution Own
Canada Brantford, Ontario Distribution 
Own (1)
Mexico Monterrey, Mexico Manufacturing—confectionery products Own
China Shanghai, China Manufacturing—confectionery products Own
Malaysia Johor, Malaysia Manufacturing—confectionery products 
Own (2)
                
(1) We have an agreement with the Ferrero Group for the use of a warehouse and distribution facility of which the Company has been deemed to be the owner for accounting purposes.
(2)TheConstruction of the the Malaysia plant is currently under construction,will be finalized in early 2016, with initial production and distribution expected to commence in the second half of 2015.mid-2016.
In addition to the locations indicated above, we also own or lease several other properties and buildings worldwide which we use for manufacturing, sales, distribution and administrative functions. Our facilities are well maintained

11


and generally have adequate capacity to accommodate seasonal demands, changing product mixes and certain additional growth. We continually improve our facilities to incorporate the latest technologies. The largest facilities are located in Hershey and Lancaster, Pennsylvania; Monterrey, Mexico; and Stuarts Draft, Virginia. The U.S., Canada and Mexico facilities in the table above primarily support our North America segment, while the China and Malaysia facilities primarily serve our International and Other segment. As discussed in Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, we do not manage our assets on a segment basis given the integration of certain manufacturing, warehousing, distribution and other activities in support of our global operations.
Item 3.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Company is subject to certain legal proceedings and claims arising out of the ordinary course of our business, which cover a wide range of matters including antitrust and trade regulation, product liability, advertising, contracts, environmental issues, patent and trademark matters, labor and employment matters and tax. See Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for information on certain legal proceedings for which there are contingencies.
Item 4.MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.

1211


SUPPLEMENTAL ITEM. EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

The executive officers of the Company, their positions and, as of February 6, 2015,5, 2016, their ages are set forth below.
Name Age Positions Held During the Last Five Years
Humberto P. Alfonso57President, International (May 2013); Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Administrative Officer (September 2011); Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer (July 2007)
John P. Bilbrey 5859 Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer (April 2015); President and Chief Executive Officer (June 2011); Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer (November 2010); Senior Vice President, President Hershey North America (December 2007)
Michele G. Buck 5354 President, North America (May 2013); Senior Vice President, Chief Growth Officer (September 2011); Senior Vice President, Global Chief Marketing Officer (December 2007)
Richard M. McConvilleJavier H. Idrovo 6148 Interim Principal FinancialChief Accounting Officer (January(August 2015); Senior Vice President, Finance and Planning (September 2011); Senior Vice President, Strategy and Business Development (November 2008)
Patricia A. Little (1)
55Senior Vice President, Chief AccountingFinancial Officer (July 2012); Corporate Controller (June 2011); Director, International Controller, International Commercial Group (April 2007)(March 2015)
Terence L. O’Day 6566 Senior Vice President, Chief Supply Chain Officer (May 2013); Senior Vice President, Global Operations (December 2008)
Leslie M. Turner (1)(2)
 5758 Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary (July 2012)
Kevin R. Walling (2)(3)
 4950 Senior Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer (November 2011); Senior Vice President, Chief People Officer (June 2011)
D. Michael Wege 5253 Senior Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer (July 2015); Senior Vice President, Chief Growth and Marketing Officer (May 2013); Senior Vice President, Chief Commercial Officer (September 2011); Senior Vice President, Chocolate Strategic Business Unit (December 2010);Vice President, U.S. Chocolate (April 2008)
Waheed Zaman (3)(4)
 5455 Senior Vice President, Chief Knowledge, Strategy and Technology Officer (July 2015); Senior Vice President, Chief Corporate Strategy and Administrative Officer (August 2013); Senior Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer (April 2013)
                
There are no family relationships among any of the above-named officers of our Company.

(1)Ms. Little was elected Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer effective March 16, 2015. Prior to joining our company she was Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Kelly Services, Inc. (July 2008).
(2)Ms. Turner was elected Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary effective July 9, 2012. Prior to joining our Company she was Chief Legal Officer of Coca-Cola North America (June 2008).
(2)(3)Mr. Walling was elected Senior Vice President, Chief People Officer effective June 1, 2011. Prior to joining our Company he was Vice President and Chief Human Resource Officer of Kennametal Inc. (November 2005).
(3)(4)Mr. Zaman was elected Senior Vice President, Chief Corporate Strategy and Administrative Officer effective August 6, 2013. Prior to joining our Company he was President and Chief Executive Officer of W&A Consulting (May 2012); Senior Vice President, Special Assignments of Chiquita Brands International (February 2012); Senior Vice President, Global Product Supply of Chiquita Brands International (October 2007).
Our Executive Officers are generally elected each year at the organization meeting of the Board in April.




1312


PART II
Item 5.
MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Our Common Stock is listed and traded principally on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol “HSY.” The Class B Common Stock (“Class B Stock”) is not publicly traded.
The closing price of our Common Stock on December 31, 2014,2015, was $103.93.$89.27. There were 33,68930,262 stockholders of record of our Common Stock and 6 stockholders of record of our Class B Stock as of December 31, 2014.2015.
We paid $440.4$476.1 million in cash dividends on our Common Stock and Class B Stock in 20142015 and $393.8$440.4 million in 2013.2014. The annual dividend rate on our Common Stock in 20142015 was $2.04$2.236 per share.
Information regarding dividends paid and the quarterly high and low market prices for our Common Stock and dividends paid for our Class B Stock for the two most recent fiscal years is disclosed in Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
On January 29, 2015,28, 2016, our Board declared a quarterly dividend of $0.535$0.583 per share of Common Stock payable on March 16, 2015,15, 2016, to stockholders of record as of February 25, 2015.2016. It is the Company’s 341st342nd consecutive quarterly Common Stock dividend. A quarterly dividend of $0.486$0.53 per share of Class B Stock also was declared.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The following table shows the purchases of shares of Common Stock made by or on behalf of Hershey, or any “affiliated purchaser” (as defined in Rule 10b-18(a)(3) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) of Hershey, for each fiscal month in the three months ended December 31, 2014:2015:
Period  
Total Number
of Shares
Purchased (1)
 
Average Price
Paid
per Share
 
Total Number of
Shares Purchased
as Part of Publicly
Announced Plans 
or Programs (2)
 
Approximate
Dollar Value of
Shares that May
Yet Be Purchased
Under the Plans or
Programs (2)
        (in thousands of dollars)
September 29 through
October 26, 2014		 100,000
 $93.30
 —
 $175,001
October 27 through
November 23, 2014		 100,000
 $95.58
 —
 $175,001
November 24 through
December 31, 2014
 152,860
 $99.60
 22,860
 $172,797
Total 352,860
 $96.68
 22,860
  
Period  
Total Number
of Shares
Purchased (1)
 
Average Price
Paid
per Share
 
Total Number of
Shares Purchased
as Part of Publicly
Announced Plans 
or Programs (2)
 
Approximate
Dollar Value of
Shares that May
Yet Be Purchased
Under the Plans or
Programs (2)
        (in thousands of dollars)
October 5 through November 1 —
 $—
 —
 $20,249
November 2 through November 29 135,000
 $87.75
 —
 $20,249
November 30 through December 31 38,000
 $86.76
 —
 $20,249
Total 173,000
 $87.53
 —
  

(1)All of the shares of Common Stock purchased during the three months ended December 31, 20142015 were purchased in open market transactions. We purchased 330,000173,000 shares of Common Stock during the three months ended December 31, 20142015 in connection with our practice of buying back shares sufficient to offset those issued under incentive compensation plans.
(2)In February 2014, our Board of Directors approved a $250 million share repurchase authorization. This program was completed in the first quarter of 2015. In February 2015, our Board of Directors approved an additional $250 million share repurchase authorization. As of December 31, 2014, $172.82015, approximately $20 million remained available for repurchases of our Common Stock under this program. TheIn January 2016, our Board of Directors approved an additional $500 million share repurchase program does not have an expiration date.authorization (excluded from the table above), to


1413


commence after the existing 2015 authorization is completed. Neither the 2015 or 2016 share repurchase authorizations has an expiration date.
Stockholder Return Performance Graph
The following graph compares our cumulative total stockholder return (Common Stock price appreciation plus dividends, on a reinvested basis) over the last five fiscal years with the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index and the Standard & Poor’s Packaged Foods Index.

Comparison of 5 Year Cumulative Total Return*
Among The Hershey Company, the S&P 500 Index,
and the S&P Packaged Foods Index
*Hypothetical $100$100 invested on December 31, 20092010 in Hershey Common Stock, S&P 500 Index and S&P 500 Packaged Foods Index, assumingstock or index, including reinvestment of dividends.
  December 31,
Company/Index 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
The Hershey Company $100
 $134
 $161
 $221
 $241
 $212
S&P 500 Index $100
 $102
 $118
 $157
 $178
 $181
S&P 500 Packaged Foods Index $100
 $117
 $129
 $169
 $189
 $221

The stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.



1514


Item 6.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

FIVE-YEAR CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL SUMMARY
(All dollar and share amounts in thousands except market price and per share statistics)
 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011
Summary of Operations                    
Net Sales $7,421,768
 $7,146,079
 $6,644,252
 $6,080,788
 $5,671,009
 $7,386,626
 $7,421,768
 $7,146,079
 $6,644,252
 $6,080,788
Cost of Sales $4,085,602
 3,865,231
 3,784,370
 3,548,896
 3,255,801
 $4,003,951
 4,085,602
 3,865,231
 3,784,370
 3,548,896
Selling, Marketing and Administrative $1,900,970
 1,922,508
 1,703,796
 1,477,750
 1,426,477
 $1,969,308
 1,900,970
 1,922,508
 1,703,796
 1,477,750
Business Realignment and Impairment Charges (Credits), Net $45,621
 18,665
 44,938
 (886) 83,433
Goodwill and Other Intangible Asset Impairment Charges $280,802
 15,900
 —
 7,457
 —
Business Realignment Charges $94,806
 29,721
 18,665
 37,481
 (886)
Interest Expense, Net $83,532
 88,356
 95,569
 92,183
 96,434
 $105,773
 83,532
 88,356
 95,569
 92,183
Provision for Income Taxes $459,131
 430,849
 354,648
 333,883
 299,065
 $388,896
 459,131
 430,849
 354,648
 333,883
Net Income $846,912
 820,470
 660,931
 628,962
 509,799
 $512,951
 846,912
 820,470
 660,931
 628,962
Net Income Per Share:                    
—Basic—Common Stock $3.91
 3.76
 3.01
 2.85
 2.29
 $2.40
 3.91
 3.76
 3.01
 2.85
—Diluted—Common Stock $3.77
 3.61
 2.89
 2.74
 2.21
 $2.32
 3.77
 3.61
 2.89
 2.74
—Basic—Class B Stock $3.54
 3.39
 2.73
 2.58
 2.08
 $2.19
 3.54
 3.39
 2.73
 2.58
—Diluted—Class B Stock $3.52
 3.37
 2.71
 2.56
 2.07
 $2.19
 3.52
 3.37
 2.71
 2.56
Weighted-Average Shares Outstanding:                    
—Basic—Common Stock 161,935
 163,549
 164,406
 165,929
 167,032
 158,471
 161,935
 163,549
 164,406
 165,929
—Basic—Class B Stock 60,620
 60,627
 60,630
 60,645
 60,708
 60,620
 60,620
 60,627
 60,630
 60,645
—Diluted 224,837
 227,203
 228,337
 229,919
 230,313
 220,651
 224,837
 227,203
 228,337
 229,919
Dividends Paid on Common Stock $328,752
 294,979
 255,596
 228,269
 213,013
 $352,953
 328,752
 294,979
 255,596
 228,269
Per Share $2.04
 1.81
 1.56
 1.38
 1.28
 $2.24
 2.04
 1.81
 1.56
 1.38
Dividends Paid on Class B Stock $111,662
 98,822
 85,610
 75,814
 70,421
 $123,179
 111,662
 98,822
 85,610
 75,814
Per Share $1.842
 1.63
 1.41
 1.25
 1.16
 $2.032
 1.842
 1.63
 1.41
 1.25
Depreciation $176,312
 166,544
 174,788
 188,491
 169,677
 $197,054
 176,312
 166,544
 174,788
 188,491
Amortization $35,220
 34,489
 35,249
 27,272
 27,439
 $47,874
 35,220
 34,489
 35,249
 27,272
Advertising $570,223
 582,354
 480,016
 414,171
 391,145
 $561,644
 570,223
 582,354
 480,016
 414,171
Year-End Position and Statistics                    
Capital Additions $345,947
 323,551
 258,727
 323,961
 179,538
 $329,707
 345,947
 323,551
 258,727
 323,961
Total Assets $5,629,516
 5,357,488
 4,754,839
 4,407,094
 4,267,627
Total Assets (1)
 $5,344,371
 5,622,870
 5,349,724
 4,747,614
 4,398,625
Short-term Debt and Current Portion of Long-term Debt $635,501
 166,875
 375,898
 139,673
 285,480
 $863,436
 635,501
 166,875
 375,898
 139,673
Long-term Portion of Debt $1,548,963
 1,795,142
 1,530,967
 1,748,500
 1,541,825
Long-term Portion of Debt (1)
 $1,557,091
 1,542,317
 1,787,378
 1,523,742
 1,740,031
Stockholders’ Equity $1,519,530
 1,616,052
 1,048,373
 880,943
 945,896
 $1,047,462
 1,519,530
 1,616,052
 1,048,373
 880,943
Full-time Employees 20,800
 12,600
 12,100
 11,800
 11,300
 19,060
 20,800
 12,600
 12,100
 11,800
Stockholders’ Data                    
Outstanding Shares of Common Stock and Class B Stock at Year-end 221,045
 223,895
 223,786
 225,206
 227,030
 216,777
 221,045
 223,895
 223,786
 225,206
Market Price of Common Stock at Year-end $103.93
 97.23
 72.22
 61.78
 47.15
 $89.27
 103.93
 97.23
 72.22
 61.78
Price Range During Year (high) $108.07
 100.90
 74.64
 62.26
 52.10
 $110.78
 108.07
 100.90
 74.64
 62.26
Price Range During Year (low) $88.15
 73.51
 59.49
 46.24
 35.76
 $83.58
 88.15
 73.51
 59.49
 46.24
          
(1) The Company adopted ASU 2015-03 as of December 31, 2015, requiring classification of debt issuance costs as a reduction of the carrying value of the debt. Total asset and long-term debt balances presented herein for periods prior to 2015 have been restated to conform to this presentation.(1) The Company adopted ASU 2015-03 as of December 31, 2015, requiring classification of debt issuance costs as a reduction of the carrying value of the debt. Total asset and long-term debt balances presented herein for periods prior to 2015 have been restated to conform to this presentation.


1615


Item 7.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
This Management's Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) is intended to provide an understanding of Hershey's financial condition, results of operations and cash flows by focusing on changes in certain key measures from year to year. The MD&A should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying Notes included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including those discussed elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, particularly in Item 1A. “Risk Factors.”
The MD&A is organized in the following sections:
Overview and Outlook
Non-GAAP Information
Consolidated Results of Operations
Segment Results
Financial Condition
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
OVERVIEW AND OUTLOOK
We are the largest producer of quality chocolate in North America and a global leader in chocolate and sugarnon-chocolate confectionery. We market, sell and distribute our products under more than 80 brand names in approximately 70 countries worldwide. As of December 31, 2014, we began reportingWe report our operations through two segments: North America and International and Other.
In 2014, weWe continued to make progress against our strategic initiatives:initiatives in 2015, including margin expansion in our North America segment which fuels our earnings per share and enables us to make investments in other parts of the business, a demonstrated commitment to transparency and simple ingredients to satisfy evolving consumer preferences, additional investments in our snacks business, and a continued focus on insights and knowledge to identify and respond to changing consumer and retail trends and practices.
Our 2015 financial performance was impacted by a continued slow-down in U.S. business increased its overall candy, mint and gum (“CMG”) market share to 31.4%,retail take-away, an increase of 0.3 share points versus 2013.
We acquired Shanghai Golden Monkey, more than doubling our presencein competitive activity and poor performance in China.
We expanded into snacks and adjacencies with the launch of Hershey’s Spreads and the related Snacksters Graham Dippers.
We sourced 30% of our cocoa needs from certified and sustainable cocoa farms, putting us in a solid position to deliver on our goal of sourcing 100% certified cocoa by 2020.
However, 2014 also presented some challenges. In our U.S. markets, we believe lower retail store traffic and changes in consumer spending patterns impacted how consumers shopped for snacks, while a number of our international markets continued to experience macroeconomic headwinds. Despite these challenges, our 2014 net sales and net income growth of 3.9% and 3.2%, respectively, reflects solid performance.
For the full year 2014,2015, our U.S. CMG retail takeaway increase of 2.7%increased 2.4%, which was about one full percentage point greater thanlargely in line with the category growth rate. However, throughoutrate but continues to be down from long-term historical average of 3-4%. We believe the year, retail store trafficcategory is being impacted by changing consumer shopping habits like channel shifting and consumer trips were irregular. Additionally,e-commerce, increased competitive activity and higher levels of distributionmerchandising and in-store activitydisplay, and a proliferation of items such as salty, bakery and meat snacks, by both mainstream and newer contemporary niche manufacturers, were prevalent throughout the year and drove broader snacking category growthoptions in 2014,the marketplace, which we believeappears to be adversely impactedimpacting purchases of non-seasonal candy products.
Our Shanghai Golden Monkey (“SGM”) business has performed below expectations since its initial acquisition in 2014, internationalwith net sales and earnings levels well below pre-acquisition levels. In addition, as part of our ongoing integration process, we assessed the quality of SGM’s accounts receivable and existing distributor networks. Based on the declining performance levels and the results of our integration assessments, we performed an interim goodwill impairment test as of July 5, 2015, which resulted in a preliminary $249.8 million non-cash goodwill impairment charge, representing a write-down of all of the goodwill related to the SGM reporting unit as of July 5, 2015. During the third quarter, we updated our estimates of the acquisition-date fair values of the net assets acquired, which increased the value of acquired goodwill by $16.6 million. We also finalized the impairment test of the goodwill relating to the SGM reporting unit, which resulted in a write-off of this additional goodwill, for a total impairment of $266.4 million. In the fourth quarter of 2015, we reached an agreement with the selling SGM shareholders to reduce the originally-agreed purchase price for the remaining 20% of SGM, and we completed the purchase on February 3, 2016. We are directing our efforts currently on developing an integration plan that is focused on the optimal structure for top-line growth.
Macroeconomic challenges and changing consumer shopping behavior adversely impacted our China chocolate business during 2015. The China chocolate category performance continues to be below the historical compound annual growth rate of 11-12% as marketplace trends continue to slow across all channels. As a result of the declining

16


performance in our China chocolate business, during the third quarter we also wrote-off $14.4 million of goodwill that resulted from the SGM acquisition and was assigned to our existing China chocolate business, as this reporting unit was expected to benefit from acquisition synergies relating to the sale of Golden Monkey-branded product through its Tier 1 and hypermarket distributor networks. In light of the declining results in our China business and challenges impacting the overall retail landscape in Asia, we will continue to assess the impact of potential excess capacity on the carrying value of our long-lived assets in the Asia region.
In June, we announced a new productivity initiative intended to simplify the organizational structure to enhance our ability to rapidly anticipate and respond to the changing demands of the global consumer. In 2015, we incurred charges totaling $105.8 million, representing employee severance and related separation benefits, pension settlement charges, and incremental third-party costs related to the design and implementation of the new organizational structure. Excluding pension settlement charges, we currently estimate total pre-tax charges and costs for the program to be approximately $120 million, the majority of which are cash. The remaining costs for this program are expected to be incurred within the first three quarters of 2016.
Giving consideration to the aforementioned impacts, our 2015 net sales decreased 0.5%, to $7,386.6 million in 2015 from $7,421.8 million in 2014, while our net income and earnings per share-diluted declined by 39.4% and 38.5%, respectively. Excluding a 1.6% impact from unfavorable foreign exchange rates, our net sales increased nearly 15%1.1%. On a non-GAAP basis, our net income increased by 1.5%, includingdriven by positive U.S. gross margin expansion, while our non-GAAP EPS also benefited from recent share buybacks, increasing a 2.7% unfavorabletotal of 3.5%.
Entering 2016, we expect changing shopping habits in the U.S. and volatile international markets to remain a headwind. Despite these issues, we will continue to invest in our core brands in the U.S. and key international markets and build on the strategies we have established as they will benefit the company over the long term. We also plan to make incremental investments in our existing snacks platform to drive additional growth. These initiatives should enable us to achieve net sales and earnings growth. We expect to achieve long-term net sales growth of 3-5%, excluding the impact of foreign currency exchange rates, and, given the scale advantages of our North America business and a balanced approach to international investments, we expect to generate long-term non-GAAP earnings per share-diluted growth of 6-8%.
For 2016, we expect net sales contributiongrowth of approximately 7%3%, or $54 million, from Shanghai Golden Monkey Food Joint Stock Co., Ltd. (“SGM”). Excluding SGM andexcluding the unfavorableimpact of foreign currency exchange impact, our internationalrates which is estimated to be approximately 1.0% unfavorable. North America net sales increased approximately 10%.
Our 2014 results were also impacted by increasing commodity and other input costs. In North America, we announced a weighted average price increase in July 2014 of approximately 8% across our instant consumable, multi-pack, packaged candy and grocery lines to help offset part of the significant increases in our input costs, including raw

17


materials, packaging, fuel, utilities and transportation, which we expect to incur in the future. While the increase was effective immediately, direct buying customers were given an opportunity to purchase transitional amounts of product at price points prior to the increase during the immediately following four-week period, and the increase is notare expected to benefit seasonal sales until Halloween 2015. Therefore, this action did not materially benefit our 2014 results, but should be beneficial to our 2015 earnings.
Entering 2015, we are focused on acceleratingdriven by confectionery and snacks growth, and weincluding Krave meat snacks distribution gains. We have a solid line-up ofmany exciting new products that will bring variety, news and excitement to the category. In addition to the fourth quarter carryover benefit from Brookside Crunchy Clusters andcategory, including Reese’s Spreads take home jar, we are also launching Kit Kat White Minis,Snack Mix and Hershey’s Caramels,Snack Bites canisters, Ice BreakersCool BlastsCadbury Chews, Reese’s Spreads Snacksters Graham Dipperschocolates in a stand-up pouch targeting the mass premium market and the introduction of Allan Candy sugar confectionery peg bag items and some other yet-to-be-announcedyet to be announced new candy and snacking products. These launchesWe expect gross margin to approximate the 2015 level and are focused on managing non-essential selling, marketing and administrative as we continue to leverage existing resources. Additionally, implementation of the business productivity initiative announced in June is on track, and we will be supported with higher levels ofcontinue to invest in advertising and in-store merchandising and programming that should enable us to mitigate the impact of volume elasticity related to the 2014 price increase and compete effectively across the CMG and broader snack categories. Additionally, we expect advertising,consumer marketing, including a greater shift to digital and mobile communication, to increase atcommunication. As a rate greater than net sales growth.
We currently estimate full year 2015 net sales growth of 5.5% to 7.5%, including the impact of foreign currency exchange rates and a net contribution from acquisitions and divestitures of approximately 2.5%. This reflects our expectation for continued macroeconomic headwinds in international markets and slowly improving U.S. non-seasonal trends. In addition, we now anticipate foreign currency exchange impacts to be greater than our previous estimate and to have an unfavorable impact of approximately 1% on full year net sales growth.
We continue to focus on growth initiatives and margin-enhancing opportunities in addition to normal productivity gains. With the conclusion of the Project Next Century (“PNC”) program, in 2015 we will begin to focus on the opportunities that exist for future incremental increases in productivity and costs savings. A portion of any potential savings from this assessment would be reinvested in initiatives to accelerate revenue growth. We continue to have good visibility into our cost structure, with the exception of dairy products which cannot be effectively hedged. We currently expect 2015 gross margin to increase approximately 135 to 145 basis points driven by the 2014 pricing action and productivity. Therefore,result, we expect 2015 growth in2016 full-year reported earnings per share-diluted in a rangeto improve significantly, on the basis of 10% to 13%, including net dilution from acquisitionslower unusual charges, and divestitures of $0.03 to $0.05 per share. We expect growth in adjusted earnings per share-diluted of 8% to 10%increase approximately 6%, as reflected in the reconciliation of reported to adjusted projections for 2015 provided below.2016 that follows.
NON-GAAP INFORMATION
The following table providesOur 2016 outlook reflects information currently available to us; however, it is subject to risks and uncertainties, particularly pertaining to the macroeconomic uncertainties and evolving consumer dynamics in China. While further volatility could evolve in that market, we do not expect it to have a reconciliation of projected 2015 earnings per share-diluted and 2014 and 2013 earnings per share-diluted, each prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”), to non-GAAP projected adjusted earnings per share-diluted for 2015 and adjusted earnings per share-diluted for 2014 and 2013:
  2015 (Projected) 2014 2013
Reported EPS-Diluted $4.14 - $4.25 $3.77 $3.61
Acquisition integration and transaction charges 0.05 - 0.06 0.05 0.03
Business realignment charges, including PNC 0.04 - 0.05 0.03 0.05
Non-service related pension expense (income) 0.04 - 0.05 (0.01) 0.03
India impairment charge — 0.06 —
Loss on anticipated sale of Mauna Loa — 0.08 —
Adjusted EPS-Diluted $4.30 - $4.38 $3.98 $3.72
For the non-GAAP adjusted earnings per share-diluted measure presented above, we have provided (1) the most directly comparable GAAP measure; (2) a reconciliation of the differences between the non-GAAP measure and the most directly comparable GAAP measure; (3) an explanation of whymaterial impact on our management believes this non-GAAP measure provides useful information to investors; and (4) additional purposes for which we use this non-GAAP measure.consolidated cash flows or financial position.

1817


We believe thatNON-GAAP INFORMATION
The comparability of certain of our financial measures is impacted by business realignment charges, including the disclosure2015 productivity initiative; asset impairment charges; costs relating to business and asset acquisitions and disposals; loss on early extinguishment of adjusted earnings per share-diluted providesdebt; and non-service related components of our pension expense (income).
To provide additional information to investors with a betterto facilitate the comparison of our year-to-year operating results. Wepast and present performance, we use non-GAAP financial measures within MD&A that exclude the effectsfinancial impact of certain items from earnings per share-diluted when we evaluate keythese activities. These non-GAAP financial measures are used by management in evaluating results of our performanceoperations internally and in assessing the impact of known trends and uncertainties on our business. We also believebusiness, but they are not intended to replace the presentation of financial results in accordance with GAAP. A reconciliation of the non-GAAP financial measures referenced in MD&A to their nearest comparable GAAP financial measures as presented in the Consolidated Statements of Income is provided below.

18


Reconciliation of Certain Non-GAAP Financial Measures
 For the years ended December 31,
In thousands except per share data201520142013
Reported gross profit$3,382,675
$3,336,166
$3,280,848
Other business realignment charges8,801
1,622
402
Acquisition and integration costs7,308
—
310
NSRPE(I)2,516
(2,685)5,374
Non-GAAP gross profit$3,401,300
$3,335,103
$3,286,934
Reported operating profit$1,037,759
$1,392,261
$1,338,051
2015 productivity initiative105,753
—
—
Other business realignment charges12,555
12,034
19,085
Acquisition and integration costs20,899
12,360
4,072
NSRPE(I)18,079
(1,834)10,885
Goodwill / intangible asset impairment280,802
15,900
—
Loss on Mauna Loa divestiture2,667
22,256
—
Non-GAAP operating profit$1,478,514
$1,452,977
$1,372,093
Reported interest expense, net$105,773
$83,532
$88,356
Acquisition and integration costs (benefits)1,562
(1,603)—
Loss on early extinguishment of debt28,326
—
—
Non-GAAP interest expense, net$75,885
$85,135
$88,356
Reported other (income) expense, net$30,139
$2,686
$(1,624)
Acquisition and integration costs—
2,513
—
Gain on sale of trademark(9,950)—
—
Non-GAAP other (income) expense, net$40,089
$173
$(1,624)
Reported provision for income taxes$388,896
$459,131
$430,849
2015 productivity initiative35,423
—
—
Other business realignment charges3,605
3,697
7,259
Acquisition and integration costs8,264
3,021
(1,295)
NSRPE(I)6,955
(544)4,228
Goodwill / intangible asset impairment—
1,565
—
Loss on early extinguishment of debt10,736
—
—
Loss on Mauna Loa divestiture2,620
4,896
—
Gain on sale of trademark(3,652)—
—
Non-GAAP provision for income taxes$452,847
$471,766
$441,041
Reported net income$512,951
$846,912
$820,470
2015 productivity initiative70,330
—
—
Other business realignment charges8,950
8,337
11,826
Acquisition and integration costs14,196
10,249
5,367
NSRPE(I)11,124
(1,290)6,657
Goodwill / intangible asset impairment280,802
14,335
—
Loss on early extinguishment of debt17,591
—
—
Loss on Mauna Loa divestiture47
17,360
—
Gain on sale of trademark(6,298)—
—
Non-GAAP net income$909,693
$895,903
$844,320
Reported EPS - Diluted$2.32
$3.77
$3.61
2015 productivity initiative0.32
—
—
Other business realignment charges0.04
0.03
0.05
Acquisition and integration costs0.05
0.05
0.03
NSRPE(I)0.05
(0.01)0.03
Goodwill / intangible asset impairment1.28
0.06
—
Loss on early extinguishment of debt0.09
—
—
Loss on Mauna Loa divestiture—
0.08
—
Gain on sale of trademark(0.03)—
—
Non-GAAP EPS - Diluted$4.12
$3.98
$3.72

19


In the assessment of our results, we review and discuss the following financial metrics that excludingare derived from the effectsreported and non-GAAP financial measures presented above:
 For the years ended December 31,
 2015 2014 2013
As reported gross margin45.8% 45.0% 45.9%
Non-GAAP gross margin (1)46.0% 44.9% 46.0%
      
As reported operating profit margin14.0% 18.8% 18.7%
Non-GAAP operating profit margin (2)20.0% 19.6% 19.2%
      
As reported effective tax rate43.1% 35.2% 34.4%
Non-GAAP effective tax rate (3)33.2% 34.5% 34.3%

(1)Calculated as non-GAAP gross profit as a percentage of net sales for each period presented.
(2)Calculated as non-GAAP operating profit as a percentage of net sales for each period presented.
(3)Calculated as non-GAAP provision for income taxes as a percentage of non-GAAP income before taxes (calculated as non-GAAP operating profit minus non-GAAP interest expense, net plus or minus non-GAAP other (income) expense, net.

Details of thesethe activities impacting comparability that are presented as reconciling items providesto derive the non-GAAP financial measures in the tables above are as follows:

2015 productivity initiative
In June 2015, we announced a new productivity initiative, which is intended to move decision making closer to the customer and the consumer, to enable a more balanced viewenterprise-wide approach to innovation, to more swiftly advance our knowledge agenda, and to provide for a more efficient cost structure, while ensuring that we effectively allocate resources to future growth areas. The project is intended to simplify the organizational structure to enhance the Company's ability to rapidly anticipate and respond to the changing demands of the underlying dynamicsglobal consumer. We recorded pre-tax charges related to this program of $105.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. See Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information.

Other business realignment activities
We periodically undertake restructuring and cost reduction activities as part of ongoing efforts to enhance long-term profitability. For the year ended December 31, 2015, we recorded pre-tax charges of $12.6 million relating to programs commenced in 2014 to rationalize certain non-U.S. manufacturing and distribution activities and to establish our own sales and distribution teams in Brazil in connection with our purchase of the non-controlling interest from our joint venture partner. For the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, we incurred pre-tax charges of $12.0 million and $19.1 million, respectively, primarily relating to the demolition of the Company's former manufacturing facility, representing the final phase of the Project Next Century Program. This program was substantially complete as of December 31, 2014.
Acquisition and integration costs
For the year ended December 31, 2015, we incurred costs related to integration of the 2014 acquisitions of SGM and Allan Candy and the 2015 acquisition of Krave totaling $22.5 million as we incorporate these businesses into our operating practices and information systems. This includes charges incurred to write-down approximately $6.4 million of expired or near-expiration work-in-process inventory at SGM, in connection with the implementation of our business.
Adjusted earnings per share-diluted excludesglobal quality standards and practices. In addition, integration costs for the impactsyear were benefited by a $6.8 million reduction in the fair value of contingent consideration paid to the Krave shareholders. For the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, we incurred pre-tax acquisition and integration costs of $13.3 million and transaction costs; charges of $4.1 million, respectively. The 2014 and non-cash impairments associated with our business realignment initiatives; the non-cash goodwill impairment charge2013 charges were largely related to SGM acquisition and integration costs. The 2014 charges were also offset by a $4.6 million gain relating to our India business; the estimated loss on the anticipated saleacquisition of our Mauna Loa business; and non-service-relateda controlling interest in Lotte Shanghai Food Company.


20


Non-service related pension expense (income).
Non-service-related pension expense (income) includes interest costs, the expected return on pension plan assets, the amortization of actuarial gains and losses, and certain curtailment and settlement losses or credits. The non-service-related pension expense (income) may be quite volatilecan fluctuate from year-to-year as a result of changes in market interest rates and market returns on pension plan assets. Therefore, we have excluded non-service-related pension expense (income) from our internal performance measures, and we believe that adjusted earnings per share-diluted, excluding non-service-related pension expense (income), will provide investors with a better understanding of the underlying profitability of our ongoing business. We believe that the service cost component of our total pension benefit costs closely reflects the operating costs of our business and provides for a better comparison of our operating results from year-to-year. Therefore, we exclude the non-service-related pension expense (income) from our internal performance measures. Our most significant defined benefit pension plans were closed to most new participants in 2007, resulting in ongoing service costs that are stable and predictable. We recorded pre-tax non-service related pension expense (income) of $18.1 million, $(1.8) million and $10.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The 2015 expense adjustment includes approximately $9.6 million in settlement charges relating to lump-sum distributions to participants that did not separate in connection with the 2015 productivity initiative; settlement charges relating to individuals separating in connection with the 2015 Productivity Initiative are included within the “2015 Productivity Initiative” costs noted above.

Goodwill and other intangible asset impairment
As discussed in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, in the second and third quarters of 2015, we recorded a total $280.8 million non-cash goodwill impairment charge, representing a write-down of all of the goodwill resulting from the SGM acquisition, including $14.4 million relating to the portion of goodwill that had been allocated to our China chocolate reporting unit, based on synergies to be realized by this business. For the year ended December 31, 2014, we recorded non-cash goodwill and other intangible asset impairment charges totaling $15.9 million associated with our business in India.

Loss on early extinguishment of debt
In 2015, we recorded within interest expense a pre-tax loss on early extinguishment of debt of $28.3 million relating to a cash tender offer. See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.

Loss on Mauna Loa divestiture
In December 2014, we entered into an agreement to sell Mauna Loa, at which time the entity was recorded as held for sale and we recorded an estimated loss of $22.3 million to reflect the disposal entity at its fair value, less an estimate of the selling costs. The transaction closed in the first quarter of 2015, resulting in the recording of an additional loss on sale of $2.7 million, based on updates to the selling expenses and tax benefits.

Gain on sale of trademark
In 2015, we recorded a $9.9 million gain relating to the sale of a non-core trademark.

21


2016 Outlook
The following table provides a reconciliation of projected 2016 earnings per share-diluted, prepared in accordance with GAAP, to projected non-GAAP earnings per share-diluted for 2016, prepared on a non-GAAP basis, with adjustments consistent to those discussed previously. The reconciliation of 2015 and 2014 earnings per share-diluted, prepared in accordance with GAAP, to 2015 and 2015 non-GAAP earnings per share-diluted is provided below for comparison.
      
 
2016
(Projected)

 2015 2014
Reported EPS – Diluted$4.18 - $4.23 $2.32 $3.77
Business realignment charges     
     2015 Productivity Initiative0.07 - 0.08 0.32 —
     Other international programs— 0.04 0.03
Acquisition and integration costs0.02 - 0.03 0.05 0.05
Non-service related pension expense (income)0.06 - 0.07 0.05 (0.01)
Goodwill / intangible asset impairment— 1.28 0.06
Loss on early extinguishment of debt— 0.09 —
Loss on sale of Mauna Loa— — 0.08
Gain on sale of trademark— (0.03) —
Adjusted EPS – Diluted$4.36 - $4.38 $4.12 $3.98

Our 2016 projected earnings per share-diluted, as presented above, does not include the impact of mark-to-market gains and losses on our commodity derivative contracts that will be reflected within corporate unallocated expenses in our segment results until the related inventory is sold, pursuant to our revised accounting policy for commodity derivatives as discussed in Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.





1922


CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
       Percent / Point Change       Percent Change
For the years ended December 31, 2014 2013 2012 2014 vs 2013 2013 vs 2012 2015 2014 2013 2015 vs 2014 2014 vs 2013
In millions of dollars except per share amounts                    
Net Sales $7,421.8
 $7,146.0
 $6,644.3
 3.9 % 7.6 % $7,386.6
 $7,421.8
 $7,146.1
 (0.5)% 3.9 %
Cost of Sales 4,085.6
 3,865.2
 3,784.4
 5.7 % 2.1 % 4,003.9
 4,085.6
 3,865.2
 (2.0)% 5.7 %
Gross Profit 3,336.2
 3,280.8
 2,859.9
 1.7 % 14.7 % 3,382.7
 3,336.2
 3,280.9
 1.4 % 1.7 %
Gross Margin 45.0% 45.9% 43.0%     45.8% 45.0% 45.9%    
SM&A Expense 1,901.0
 1,922.5
 1,703.8
 (1.1)% 12.8 % 1,969.3
 1,898.4
 1,924.1
 3.7 % (1.3)%
SM&A Expense as a percent of net sales 25.6% 26.9% 25.6%     26.7% 25.6% 26.9%    
Business Realignment and Impairment
Charges, Net
 45.6
 18.6
 45.0
 144.4 % (58.5)%
EBIT 1,389.6
 1,339.7
 1,111.1
 3.7 % 20.6 %
EBIT Margin 18.7% 18.7% 16.7%    
Goodwill and Other Intangible Asset Impairment Charges 280.8
 15.9
 —
 NM
 NM
Business Realignment Charges 94.8
 29.7
 18.7
 219.0 % 59.2 %
Operating Profit 1,037.8
 1,392.2
 1,338.1
 (25.5)% 4.1 %
Operating Profit Margin 14.0% 18.8% 18.7%    
Interest Expense, Net 83.6
 88.4
 95.6
 (5.5)% (7.5)% 105.8
 83.5
 88.4
 26.6 % (5.5)%
Other (Income) Expense, Net 30.1
 2.7
 (1.6) NM
 265.4 %
Provision for Income Taxes 459.1
 430.8
 354.6
 6.6 % 21.5 % 388.9
 459.1
 430.8
 (15.3)% 6.6 %
Effective Income Tax Rate 35.2% 34.4% 34.9%     43.1% 35.2% 34.4%    
Net Income $846.9
 $820.5
 $660.9
 3.2 % 24.1 % $513.0
 $846.9
 $820.5
 (39.4)% 3.2 %
Net Income Per Share—Diluted $3.77
 $3.61
 $2.89
 4.4 % 24.9 % $2.32
 $3.77
 $3.61
 (38.5)% 4.4 %
          
Note: Percentage changes may not compute directly as shown due to rounding of amounts presented above.Note: Percentage changes may not compute directly as shown due to rounding of amounts presented above.
NM = not meaningful.NM = not meaningful.
Net Sales
2015 compared with 2014
Net sales decreased 0.5% in 2015 compared with 2014, reflecting volume declines of 3.4% and the unfavorable impact from foreign currency exchange rates of 1.6%, substantially offset by favorable net price realization of 3.5% as well as a 1.0% benefit from net acquisitions and divestitures. The favorable net price realization, primarily in the U.S., was attributed to the price increase announced in mid-2014. The volume declines were attributed to volume elasticity relating to the pricing action in the U.S. as well as lower everyday product sales given the challenging shopper environment in North America, coupled with lower sales in China. Excluding foreign currency, our net sales increased 1.1% in 2015.
2014 compared with 2013
Net sales increased 3.9% in 2014 compared with 2013, reflecting volume growth of 4.4% and favorable net price realization of 0.2%, offset in part by an unfavorable impact from foreign currency exchange rates which reduced net sales by approximately 0.7%. The volume growth was driven by incremental sales of new products in our North America and International and Other segments, coupled with almost 1% of growth from the recent SGM acquisition. The pricing benefit from the 2014 mid-year price increase was largely offset by higher trade promotions and lower core volumes associated with near-term volume elasticity related to the price increase. As discussed previously, we expect the 2014 pricing action to be more impactful to our 2015 results.
2013 compared with 2012
Net sales increased 7.6% in 2013 compared with 2012, reflecting volume increases of 7.8% and nominal price realization of 0.1%, offset in part by an unfavorable impact from foreign currency exchange rates which reduced net sales by approximately 0.3%. Higher sales of Brookside products contributed approximately 1.3% to the net sales increase.
Key U.S. Marketplace Metrics
For the 52 weeks ended December 31, 2014 2013 2012 2015 2014 2013
Hershey's Consumer Takeaway Increase 2.7% 6.3% 5.7% 2.4% 2.7% 6.3%
Hershey's Market Share Increase 0.3
 1.1
 0.6
Hershey's Market Share (Decrease) Increase (0.1) 0.3
 1.1

23


Consumer takeaway and the change in market share are provided for measured channels of distribution accounting for approximately 90% of our U.S. confectionery retail business. These channels of distribution primarily include food, drug, mass merchandisers, and convenience store channels, plus Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., partial dollar, club and military channels.Hershey's Spreads, the jar and instant consumable pack types, is not captured in the U.S. CMG database referenced herein, as Nielsen captures this within grocery items.

20


These metrics are based on measured market scanned purchases as reported by Nielsen and provide a means to assess our retail takeaway and market position relative to the overall category. In 2014,2015, the category and Hershey growth rates were below historical levels as retail store trafficcontinue to be impacted by changing consumer shopping habits and consumer trips were irregular during the year. Additionally, increased levels of distribution and in-store activity of items such as salty, bakery and meat snacks, by both mainstream and newer contemporary niche manufacturers, were prevalent throughout the year and drovewhich has been driving broader snacking category growth in 2014.2014 and 2015. Despite these market dynamics, for the full year 2014,2015, our U.S. CMG retail takeaway increased 2.7%2.4%, which exceeded thewas in line with category growth rate of 1.8%, and ourgrowth. Our market share increaseddecreased by 3010 basis points.points; however, we maintained an industry leading 31.3% U.S. market share.
Cost of Sales and Gross Margin
2015 compared with 2014
Cost of sales decreased 2.0% in 2015 compared with 2014. Supply chain productivity and volume declines reduced cost of sales by approximately 6.6%. These declines were substantially offset by higher supply chain and commodity costs, and unfavorable sales mix, which together increased total cost of sales by approximately 4.1%. In addition, cost of sales was impacted by acquisition and integration costs of $7.3 million, business realignment charges of $8.8 million and non-service related pension expense of $2.5 million, which collectively increased cost of sales by approximately 0.5%. In comparison, cost of sales benefited by $1.1 million in 2014, primarily due to non-service related pension income.
Gross margin increased by 80 basis points in 2015 compared with 2014. Favorable net price realization as well as supply chain productivity and other cost savings initiatives collectively improved gross margin by 330 basis points. However, these benefits were substantially offset by higher supply chain and commodity costs as well as unfavorable sales mix, which collectively reduced gross margin by approximately 250 basis points. On a non-GAAP basis, excluding the business realignment and acquisition and integration charges, 2015 gross margin increased by 110 basis points.
2014 compared with 2013
Cost of sales increased 5.7% in 2014 compared with 2013. Higher costs associated with sales volume increases, higher commodity and other incremental supply chain costs and unfavorable sales mix increased total cost of sales by approximately 7.8%. The higher commodity costs were largely driven by higher dairy ingredient costs, which cannot be effectively hedged, while the unfavorable sales mix resulted from a greater proportion of seasonal sales volumes, which are typically at lower margins than non-seasonal products. These cost increases were offset in part by supply chain productivity improvements and lower pension costs, which together reduced cost of sales by approximately 2.1%.
Gross margin decreased by 90 basis points in 2014 compared with 2013. Supply chain productivity and other cost savings initiatives, favorable net price realization, and operating leverage from the higher sales volumes collectively improved gross margin by 150 basis points. The impact of lower pension expenses in 2014 in comparison with 2013 benefited 2014 gross margin by 20 basis points. However, these benefits were more than offset by higher commodity and other input costs and unfavorable sales mix which together reduced gross profit margin by approximately 260 basis points.
2013 compared with 2012
Cost of sales increased 2.1% in 2013 compared with 2012. The impact of sales volume increases and supply chain cost inflation together increased cost of sales by approximately 9.4%. Lower input costs, supply chain productivity improvements and a favorable sales mix reduced cost of sales by approximately 6.3%. Business realignment and impairment charges of $0.4 million were included in cost of sales in 2013, compared with $36.4 million in the prior year, benefiting 2013 cost of sales by 1.0%.
Gross margin increased by 290 basis points in 2013 compared with 2012. Reduced input costs, supply chain productivity improvements, a favorable sales mix and lower fixed costs as a percent of sales together improved gross margin by 390 basis points. These improvements were partially offset by supply chain cost inflation which reduced gross margin by 160 basis points. The impact of lower business realignment and impairment charges recorded in 2013 compared with 2012 benefited 2013 gross margin by 60 basis points.
Selling, Marketing and Administrative
20142015 compared with 20132014
Selling, marketing and administrative (“SM&A”) expenses decreased $21.5increased $70.9 million or 1.1%3.7% in 2015. Advertising and related consumer marketing expense increased 1.0% during this period. Excluding these advertising and related consumer marketing costs, selling and administrative expenses for 2015 increased by 6.7% as compared to 2014, driven by incremental increases from acquired businesses. Excluding the impact of acquisition costs, SM&A expenses for 2015 declined as a result of our continued focus on non-essential spending. SM&A expenses in 2015 were also

24


impacted by charges of $13.6 million attributed to the 2015 productivity initiative, acquisition and integration costs of $13.6 million, non-service related pension expense of $15.6 million and other business realignment charges of $3.7 million. In 2014, SM&A expenses included acquisition and integration costs of $12.4 million, other business realignment charges of $2.9 million and non-service related pension expense of $0.9 million.
2014 compared with 2013
SM&A expenses decreased $25.7 million or 1.3% in 2014. This includes a 3.1% reduction in advertising and related consumer marketing expenses due to the timing of new product launches, a reduction in media production costs and a decision to shift resources to other more productive areas. Excluding advertising and related consumer marketing expenses, selling and administrative expenses were relatively flat compared to 2013 due to lower incentive compensation costs and discretionary cost containment efforts, offset in part by higher employee-related costs, including additional headcount in our China business and additional focused selling resources, as well as transaction costs associated with the acquisition of SGM. Selling and administrative expenses in 2014 also benefited from the $4.6 million gain recorded in the first quarter on the Lotte Shanghai Food Company (“LSFC”) acquisition and the $5.6 million in foreign currency gains realized on forward contracts related to the manufacturing facility under construction in Johor, Malaysia.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Asset Impairment Charges
As discussed in the Overview and Outlook section as well as Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, the SGM business performed below expectations throughout 2015, with net sales and earnings levels well below pre-acquisition levels. As of result of this declining performance, in the second quarter we recorded an estimated goodwill impairment charge of $249.8 million relating to the SGM reporting unit. During the third quarter, we updated our estimates of the acquisition-date fair values of the net assets acquired, which increased the value of acquired goodwill by $16.6 million. We also finalized the impairment test of the goodwill relating to the SGM reporting unit, which resulted in an additional $16.6 million write-off of this increase to goodwill. During the third quarter, we also wrote off $14.4 million of goodwill that resulted from the SGM acquisition and was assigned to our existing China chocolate business, as this reporting unit was expected to benefit from acquisition synergies relating to the sale of Golden Monkey-branded product through its Tier 1 and hypermarket distributor networks. This goodwill impairment was driven by the continued declining performance in our China chocolate business through the third quarter, as a result of macroeconomic challenges and changing consumer shopping behavior mentioned previously.
In 2014, the annual impairment testing of our India reporting unit resulted in a $11.4 million goodwill impairment charge and a $4.5 million pre-tax write-down of a trademark associated with the India business. These impairment charges were largely a result of our decision to exit the oils portion of the India business and realign our approach to regional marketing and distribution in India.
The assessment of the valuation of goodwill and other long-lived assets is based on management estimates and assumptions, as discussed in our critical accounting policies included in Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. These estimates and assumptions are subject to change due to changing economic and competitive conditions.

2125


2013 compared with 2012Business Realignment Charges
SM&A expenses increased $218.7 million or 12.8% in 2013. Contributing to the overall increase was a 19.7% increase in advertising, consumer promotions and other marketing expenses to support core brands and the introduction of new products in the U.S. and international markets. Excluding the advertising and related consumer marketing costs, selling and administrative expenses increased 8.8% primarily as a result of higher employee-related expenses, increased incentive compensation costs, legal fees and increased marketing research expenses, along with the write-off of certain assets associated with the remodeling of increased office space. There were minimalExpenses recorded for business realignment charges included in SM&A in 2013 compared with $2.5 million in 2012.
Business Realignmentactivities during 2015, 2014 and Impairment Charges
Business realignment and impairment charges recorded during 2014, 2013 and 2012 weretheir classification within the Statements of Income are as follows:
For the years ended December 31, 2014 2013 2012
In millions of dollars      
Cost of sales - Next Century and other programs $1.6
 $0.4
 $36.4
Selling, marketing and administrative - Next Century and other programs 2.9
 —
 2.4
Business realignment and impairment charges:      
Next Century program:      
Pension settlement loss —
 —
 15.8
Plant closure expenses 7.5
 16.3
 20.8
Employee separation costs —
 —
 0.9
Planned divestiture of Mauna Loa 22.3
 —
 —
India impairment 15.9
 —
 —
India voluntary retirement program —
 2.3
 —
Tri-US, Inc. asset impairment charges —
 —
 7.5
Total business realignment and impairment charges 45.7
 18.6
 45.0
Total charges associated with business realignment initiatives and impairment $50.2
 $19.0
 $83.8
For the years ended December 31, 2015 2014 2013
In millions of dollars      
Cost of sales:      
Other international restructuring programs $8.8
 $—
 $—
     Next Century program —
 1.6
 0.4
Total cost of sales 8.8
 1.6
 0.4
Selling, marketing and administrative:      
2015 productivity initiative 13.6
 —
 —
Other international restructuring programs 3.8
 2.9
 —
Total selling, marketing and administrative 17.4
 2.9
 —
Business realignment charges:      
2015 productivity initiative 92.1
 —
 —
Next Century program - plant closure expenses —
 7.5
 16.4
Divestiture of Mauna Loa 2.7
 22.3
 —
India voluntary retirement program —
 —
 2.3
Total business realignment charges 94.8
 29.7
 18.7
Total charges associated with business realignment activities $121.0
 $34.3
 $19.1
Next Century Program
In2015 Productivity Initiative
On June 2010,19, 2015, we announced Project Next Centurya new productivity initiative (the “Next Century program”“2015 Productivity Initiative”) as part ofintended to move decision making closer to the customer and the consumer, to enable a more enterprise-wide approach to innovation, to more swiftly advance our ongoing effortsknowledge agenda, and to create an advantaged supply chainprovide for a more efficient cost structure, while ensuring that we effectively allocate resources to future growth areas. Overall, the 2015 Initiative is intended to simplify the organizational structure to enhance the Company's ability to rapidly anticipate and competitive cost structure. As partrespond to the changing demands of the program, productionglobal consumer.

The 2015 Productivity Initiative was transitioned fromexecuted throughout the Company's century-old facility at 19 East Chocolate Avenuethird and fourth quarters, resulting in Hershey, Pennsylvania, to an expanded West Hershey facility, which was built in 1992. The Next Century program is essentially complete asa net reduction of approximately 300 positions, with the majority of the departures taking place by the end of 2015. For the year ended December 31, 2014. Project-to-date2015, we incurred charges totaling $105.7 million, representing employee severance and related separation benefits as well as incremental third-party costs totaled $197.9 million through December 31, 2014, in line with our estimates of total pre-tax charges and non-recurring project implementation costs of $190 million to $200 million.
In 2014 and 2013, plant closure expenses were primarily related to costs associated with the demolitiondesign and implementation of the former manufacturing facility.
In 2012, charges relating to the Next Century program included the following: $36.4 million recorded innew organizational structure. This also includes a pension settlement cost of sales related primarily to start-up costs and accelerated depreciation of fixed assets over the reduced estimated remaining useful lives; $2.4 million recorded in selling, marketing and administrative expense for project administration; business realignment charges of $15.8$10.2 million relating to a non-cash pension settlement loss resulting from lump sum withdrawals by employees retiring or leaving the Company primarilyas a result of the 2015 Productivity Initiative.

Total pre-tax charges and costs for this program are expected to be approximately $120 million, the majority of which are cash. This excludes the 2015 pension settlement costs and any additional pension settlement costs that could be triggered by additional lump sum withdrawals in 2016. The remaining costs are expected to be incurred within the first three quarters of 2016.
Other international restructuring programs
Other 2015 charges for business realignment activities relate principally to accelerated depreciation and amortization and employee severance costs for programs commenced in 2014 to rationalize certain non-U.S. manufacturing and distribution activities and to establish our own sales and distribution teams in Brazil in connection with our purchase of the Next Century program; and $20.8 million primarily relatednon-controlling interest from our joint venture partner. Remaining costs relating to costs associated with the closure of a manufacturing facility and the relocation of production lines.these programs are not expected to be significant.
Planned divestiture
Divestiture of Mauna Loa
In December 2014, we entered into an agreement to sell the Mauna Loa Macadamia Nut Corporation. In connection withCorporation (“Mauna Loa”).

26


As a result of the anticipatedexpected sale, in 2014 we have recorded an estimated loss on the anticipated sale of $22.3 million to reflect the disposal entity at fair value, less an estimate of the selling costs. See Note 2The sale was completed in the first quarter of 2015, resulted in an additional loss on sale of $2.7 million based on updates to the Consolidated Financial Statementsselling expenses and tax benefits.
Next Century program
The 2014 and 2013 charges shown above relate primarily to the demolition of the Company's former manufacturing facility, representing the final phase of the Project Next Century program (“Next Century program”). This program was substantially complete as of December 31, 2014.
The restructuring charges discussed above for additional information.

22


India impairmentthe years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 relate predominantly to initiatives undertaken by the North America segment, with the exception of the international programs, which relate to the International and Other segment. Segment operating results do not include business realignment and related charges as these initiatives are generally centrally managed and are not included within our internal measures of segment performance.
In connectionOperating Profit and Operating Profit Margin
2015 compared with our annual2014
Operating profit decreased 25.5% in 2015 compared with 2014 due primarily to the goodwill and other intangible asset impairment testing, in December 2014, we recorded non-cash goodwill and trademark impairment charges, totaling $15.9 million associated with our business in India. See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
Other international restructuring programs
During 2014, we implemented restructuring programs at several non-U.S. entities to rationalize select manufacturing and distribution activities, resulting in severance and accelerated depreciation costs of $4.5 million. These costs are recorded within cost of sales andhigher selling, marketing and administrative costs. We expectcosts related to incur approximately $3.7 million of additional accelerated depreciationacquisitions as well as higher business realignment charges, offset in 2015; other remaining costs relatingpart by the higher gross profit.
Operating profit margin decreased to these programs are not expected14.0% in 2015 from 18.8% in 2014 due to be significant.
Tri-US, Inc.the goodwill impairment charges,
In December 2012, the board of directors of Tri-US, Inc., a company that manufactured, marketed higher selling, marketing and sold nutritional beverages in which we held a controlling ownership interest, decided to cease operationsadministrative expenses as a resultpercent of operational difficulties, quality issuessales, and competitive constraints. It was determined that investments necessary to continue thehigher business would not generate sufficient return. Accordingly, in December 2012, the Company recorded non-cash impairment charges of approximately $7.5 million, primarily associated with the write off of goodwillrealignment charges.
On a non-GAAP basis, 2015 operating profit and other intangible assets. These charges excluded the portion of the losses attributable to the noncontrolling interests.
Income Before Interestoperating profit margin increased 1.8% and Income Taxes ("EBIT") and EBIT Margin40 basis points, respectively.
2014 compared with 2013
EBITOperating profit increased 3.7%4.1% in 2014 compared with 2013 due primarily to the higher level of gross profit and lower overall selling, marketing and administrative costs, offset in part by the higher business realignment and impairment charges in 2014, as discussed above.2014.
EBITOperating profit margin was 18.7%increased to 18.8% in 2014 and 2013, respectively. While gross margin declined by 90 basis points in 2014, this was offset by a lower level of SM&A expense as a percent of sales, which was favorable by 130 basis points in 2014.
2013 compared with 2012
EBIT increased in 2013 compared with 2012 as a result of higher gross profit and lower business realignment charges, partially offset by higher selling, marketing and administrative expenses. Pre-tax net business realignment and impairment charges of $19.1 million were recorded in 2013 compared with $83.8 million recorded in 2012.
EBIT margin increased from 16.7% in 2012 to 18.7% in 2013 as a result of higher gross margin anddue to lower business realignment charges, partially offset by higher SM&A expenses as a percent of sales. The net impact of business realignment, impairment and acquisition charges recorded in 2013 reduced EBIT marginsales, partially offset by 30 basis points, whilehigher business realignment and impairment charges recorded in 2012 reduced EBIT margin by 130 basis point.charges.
Interest Expense, Net
2015 compared with 2014
Net interest expense was $22.3 million higher in 2015 than in 2014 due primarily to the premium paid to repurchase long-term debt as part of a cash tender offer. This increase was partially offset by higher capitalized interest expense coupled with savings resulting from fixed-to-floating interest rate swap agreements put in place towards the end of 2014.
2014 compared with 2013
Net interest expense was $4.8$4.9 million lower in 2014 than in 2013 due primarily to a greater level of capitalized interest in 2014 as well as higher interest income earned on short-term investments.
2013 compared with 2012
Net interest expense in 2013 was $7.2 million lower than in 2012 primarily as a result of lower short-term borrowings, partially offset by a decrease in capitalized interest and higher interest expense on long-term debt.

2327


Other (Income) Expense, Net
2015 compared with 2014
Other (income) expense, net was $27.4 million higher in 2015 than 2014, due primarily to the write-down of equity investments qualifying for federal historic and energy tax credits, partially offset by the gain on the sale of a non-core trademark.
2014 compared with 2013
Other (income) expense, net reflected a net expense of $2.7 million in 2014 compared to a net gain of $1.6 million in 2013, due primarily to the foreign exchange loss related to our strategy to cap the U.S. denominated acquisition price of SGM, offset in part by the gain realized on the acquisition of a controlling interest in Lotte Shanghai Food Company.
Income Taxes and Effective Tax Rate
2015 compared with 2014
Our effective income tax rate was 43.1% for 2015 compared with 35.2% for 2014. The 2015 tax rate was significantly impacted by the non-deductible goodwill impairment charges. Excluding the impact of the goodwill impairment and other non-GAAP charges, the 2015 effective income tax rate was 130 basis points lower than the 2014 rate. The 2015 rate benefited from tax credits realized from the investment tax strategy initiated in the second quarter of 2015, which was partially offset by the valuation allowance recorded against the SGM net operating loss carryforwards.
2014 compared with 2013
Our effective income tax rate was 35.2% for 2014 compared with 34.4% for 2013. The 2014 effective income tax rate was higher due to unfavorable tax return true-up adjustments, unfavorable shifts of taxable income to higher tax jurisdictions, and the impact of business realignment and impairment charges with minimal tax benefit, partly offset by favorable settlement of Canadian assessments and favorable settlement of U.S. audits.
2013 compared with 2012
Our effective income tax rate was 34.4% for 2013 compared with 34.9% for 2012. The decrease in the effective income tax rate in 2013 reflected lower state income taxes, which were higher in 2012 as a result of the impact of certain state tax legislation, and an increase in deductions associated with certain foreign tax jurisdictions, partly offset by a higher benefit in 2012 resulting from the completion of tax audits.
Net Income and Net Income Per Share
2015 compared with 2014
Net income decreased $333.9 million, or 39.4%, while earnings per share-diluted (“EPS”) decreased $1.45, or 38.5%, in 2015 compared with 2014. The decreases in both net income and EPS were driven by the goodwill impairment charges, higher selling, marketing and administrative costs related to acquisitions as well as higher business realignment charges, as noted above. Our 2015 EPS also benefited from lower weighted-average shares outstanding, as a result of share repurchases pursuant to our Board-approved repurchase programs.
On a non-GAAP basis, net income increased $13.8 million in 2015, or 1.5%, and EPS increased $0.14, or 3.5%, as compared with 2014. The increases in 2015 non-GAAP net income and EPS were primarily driven by gross margin expansion and lower net interest expense.
2014 compared with 2013
Net income increased $26.4 million, or 3.2%, while earnings per share-diluted (“EPS”)EPS-diluted increased $0.16, or 4.4%, in 2014 compared with 2013. The increases in both net income and EPS were driven by higher sales, offset by higher commodity costs and unfavorable sales mix, as noted above. Our 2014 EPS also benefited from lower weighted-average shares outstanding, as a result of share repurchases pursuant to our Board-approved repurchase programs.
2013On a non-GAAP basis, net income increased $51.6 million in 2015, or 6.1%, and EPS increased $0.26, or 7.0%, as compared with 2012
Net income increased $159.6 million, or 24.1%, while EPS-diluted increased $0.72, or 24.9%, in 2013 compared with 2012.2013. The increases in both2014 non-GAAP net income and EPS were primarily driven by higher sales, lower input costs, favorable sales mixselling, marketing and lower business realignment and impairment charges.administrative expenses as a percent of sales.




2428


SEGMENT RESULTS
The summary that follows provides a discussion of the results of operations of our two reportable segments: North America and International and Other. The segments reflect our operations on a geographic basis. For segment reporting purposes, we use “segment income” to evaluate segment performance and allocate resources. Segment income excludes unallocated general corporate administrative expenses, as well as business realignment initiatives, goodwill and other intangible asset impairment charges, acquisition-related costs, the non-service related portion of pension expense and other unusual gains or losses that are not part of our measurement of segment performance. These items of our operating income are managed centrally at the corporate level and are excluded from the measure of segment income reviewed by the CODM and used for internal management reporting and performance evaluation. Segment income and segment income margin, which are presented in the segment discussion that follows, are non-GAAP measures and do not purport to be alternatives to operating income as a measure of operating performance. We believe that these measures are useful to investors and other users of our financial information in evaluating ongoing operating profitability as well as in evaluating operating performance in relation to our competitors, as they exclude the activities that are not integral to our ongoing operations. For further information, see the Non-GAAP Disclosures at the beginning of this Item 7.
Our segment results, including a reconciliation to our consolidated results, were as follows:
For the years ended December 31,For the years ended December 31, 2014 2013 2012For the years ended December 31, 2015 2014 2013
In millions of dollarsIn millions of dollars      In millions of dollars      
Net Sales:Net Sales:      Net Sales:      
North AmericaNorth America $6,352.7
 $6,200.1
 $5,812.7
North America $6,468.1
 $6,352.7
 $6,200.1
International and OtherInternational and Other 1,069.1
 946.0
 831.6
International and Other 918.5
 1,069.1
 946.0
TotalTotal $7,421.8
 $7,146.1
 $6,644.3
Total $7,386.6
 $7,421.8
 $7,146.1
             
Segment Income:      
Segment Income (Loss):Segment Income (Loss):      
North AmericaNorth America $1,916.2
 $1,862.6
 $1,656.1
North America $2,074.0
 $1,916.2
 $1,862.6
International and OtherInternational and Other 40.0
 44.6
 51.4
International and Other (98.1) 40.0
 44.6
Total segment incomeTotal segment income 1,956.2
 1,907.2
 1,707.5
Total segment income 1,975.9
 1,956.2
 1,907.2
Unallocated corporate expense (1)Unallocated corporate expense (1) 503.4
 533.5
 478.6
Unallocated corporate expense (1) 497.4
 503.2
 535.1
Business realignment and impairment charges 50.2
 19.1
 83.8
Non-service related pension (1.8) 10.9
 20.6
Goodwill and other intangible asset impairment chargesGoodwill and other intangible asset impairment charges 280.8
 15.9
 —
Charges associated with business realignment activitiesCharges associated with business realignment activities 121.0
 34.3
 19.1
Non-service related pension expense (income)Non-service related pension expense (income) 18.1
 (1.8) 10.9
Acquisition and integration costsAcquisition and integration costs 14.8
 4.0
 13.4
Acquisition and integration costs 20.9
 12.4
 4.1
Income before interest and income taxes 1,389.6
 1,339.7
 1,111.1
Operating profitOperating profit 1,037.7
 1,392.2
 1,338.0
Interest expense, netInterest expense, net 83.6
 88.4
 95.6
Interest expense, net 105.8
 83.5
 88.3
Other (income) expense, netOther (income) expense, net 30.1
 2.7
 (1.6)
Income before income taxesIncome before income taxes $1,306.0
 $1,251.3
 $1,015.5
Income before income taxes $901.8
 $1,306.0
 $1,251.3
(1)Includes centrally-managed (a) corporate functional costs relating to legal, treasury, finance, and human resources, (b) expenses associated with the oversight and administration of our global operations, including warehousing, distribution and manufacturing, information systems and global shared services, (c) non-cash stock-based compensation expense, and (d) other gains or losses that are not integral to segment performance.

2529


North America
The North America segment is responsible for our chocolate and sugarnon-chocolate confectionery market position, as well as our grocery and growing snacks market positions, in the United States and Canada. This includes developing and growing our business in chocolate sugarand non-chocolate confectionery, refreshment, snack, pantry, and food service and other snacking product lines. North America accounted for 85.6%87.6%, 86.8%85.6% and 87.5%86.8% of our net sales in 2015, 2014 2013 and 2012,2013, respectively. North America results for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 2013 and 20122013 were as follows:
   Percent / Point Change   Percent / Point Change
For the years ended December 31, 2014 2013 2012 2014 vs 2013 2013 vs 2012 2015 2014 2013 2015 vs 2014 2014 vs 2013
In millions of dollars                    
Net sales $6,352.7
 $6,200.1
 $5,812.7
 2.5% 6.7% $6,468.1
 $6,352.7
 $6,200.1
 1.8% 2.5%
Segment income 1,916.2
 1,862.6
 1,656.1
 2.9% 12.5% 2,074.0
 1,916.2
 1,862.6
 8.2% 2.9%
Segment margin 30.2% 30.0% 28.5%     32.1% 30.2% 30.0%    
2015 compared with 2014
Net sales of our North America segment increased $115.4 million or 1.8% in 2015 compared to 2014, reflecting net price realization of 4.8% and the favorable net impact of acquisitions and divestitures of 0.3%, substantially offset by volume declines of 2.5% and an unfavorable impact from foreign currency exchange rates that reduced net sales by approximately 0.8%. The volume decline was due to elasticity related to the 2014 pricing action as well as lower everyday product sales, which have been impacted by changing consumer shopping habits, such as channel shifting and e-commerce, an increase in competitive activity and a proliferation of broader snacking options in the marketplace. Our Canada operations were impacted by the stronger U.S. dollar, which drove the unfavorable foreign currency impact.
Our North America segment income increased $157.8 million or 8.2% in 2015 compared to 2014, driven by gross margin expansion, primarily due to favorable price realization and supply chain productivity which offset volume declines and input cost increases.
2014 compared with 2013
Net sales of our North America segment increased $152.6 million or 2.5% in 2014 compared to 2013, reflecting volume growth of 2.4%, net price realization of 0.5% and an unfavorable impact from foreign currency exchange rates that reduced net sales by approximately 0.4%. 2014 new product introductions, including York and Kit Kat Minis, Nutrageous relaunch, Brookside Crunchy Clusters, Lancaster Soft Cremes and Hershey's Spreads, drove the volume growth, as sales volumes for core, everyday products were unfavorably impacted by increased levels of distribution and in-store activity from confection and other snacking categories. Higher levels of trade promotion reduced the benefit from the 2014 mid-year pricing action. Our Canada operations were impacted by the stronger U.S. dollar, which drove the unfavorable foreign currency impact.
Our North America segment income increased $53.6 million or 2.9% in 2014 compared to 2013, principally due to higher sales volumes and supply chain productivity improvements, which offset input cost increases and unfavorable sales mix. Our core product mix in 2014 was more heavily weighted toward seasonal offerings which typically generate lower margins than our core, everyday instant consumable products. Additionally, advertising, consumer promotions and marketing expenses decreased 2.8% in 2014 due to the timing of new product launches, a reduction in media production costs, and a decision to shift resources to other more productive areas.
2013 compared with 2012
Net sales of our North America segment increased $387.4 million or 6.7% in 2013 compared to 2012, reflecting volume growth of 6.4%, positive net price realization of 0.5% and an unfavorable impact from foreign currency exchange rates of 0.2%. Higher sales of Brookside products contributed 1.4% to the 2013 net sales increase for the segment.
Our North America segment income increased $206.5 million or 12.5% in 2013 compared to 2012, principally due to higher sales volumes, positive sales mix and lower commodity input costs. However, advertising, consumer promotions and marketing expenses increased 15.0% to support core brands and the introduction of new products, which offset some of the increase. Additionally, segment expenses were higher as a result of increased employee-related, incentive compensation and marketing research expenses.
International and Other
The International and Other segment includes all other countries where we currently manufacture, import, market, sell or distribute chocolate sugarand non-chocolate confectionery and other products. Currently, this includes our operations in China and other Asia markets, Latin America, Europe, Africa and the Middle East, along with exports to these regions. While a minorless significant component, this segment also includes our global retail operations, including Hershey’s Chocolate World stores in Hershey, Pennsylvania, New York City, Chicago, Las Vegas, Shanghai, Niagara Falls (Ontario), Dubai and Singapore, as well as operations associated with licensing the use of certain trademarks and products to third parties around the world. International and Other accounted for 14.4%12.4%, 13.2%14.4% and 12.5%13.2% of our net

30


sales in 2015, 2014 2013 and 2012,2013, respectively. International and Other results for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 2013 and 20122013 were as follows:

26


   Percent / Point Change   Percent / Point Change
For the years ended December 31, 2014 2013 2012 2014 vs 2013 2013 vs 2012 2015 2014 2013 2015 vs 2014 2014 vs 2013
In millions of dollars                    
Net sales $1,069.1
 $946.0
 $831.6
 13.0 % 13.8 % $918.5
 $1,069.1
 $946.0
 (14.1)% 13.0 %
Segment income 40.0
 44.6
 51.4
 (10.3)% (13.2)%
Segment (loss) income (98.1) 40.0
 44.6
 NM
 (10.3)%
Segment margin 3.7% 4.7% 6.2%     (10.7)% 3.7% 4.7%    
2015 compared with 2014
Net sales of our International and Other segment decreased $150.6 million or 14.1% in 2015 compared to 2014, reflecting volume declines of 9.0%, the unfavorable impact from foreign currency exchange rates of 6.2%, and unfavorable net price realization of 4.0%, partially offset by incremental revenue from the acquisition of SGM representing an increase of 5.1% to 2015 net sales. Excluding the unfavorable impact of foreign currency exchange rates, the net sales of our International and Other segment declined approximately 7.9%.
The net sales decline was driven by volume declines in our China chocolate business. In 2015, chocolate category growth in China was flat relative to the prior year; however our 2015 chocolate retail takeaway in China declined by 11%, resulting in a market share decline in China of 1.1%. We believe that the category continues to be impacted by macroeconomic challenges and trends that are affecting consumer shopping behavior as accelerated e-commerce and on-line purchases of broader consumer staples are leading to lower trips to Tier 1 hypermarkets, where the majority of our chocolate sales are derived, adversely impacting the impulse-oriented chocolate category.
Performance in our focus markets of Mexico and Brazil improved and, on a constant currency basis, net sales in 2015 in these countries increased by approximately 6% and 3%, respectively, versus 2014. Constant currency net sales in India declined in 2015, primarily due to the planned discontinuance of edible oil products.
Our International and Other segment loss was $98.1 million in 2015 compared to segment income of $40.0 million in 2014. The decline was primarily attributable to lower net sales of chocolate products in China, coupled with losses at SGM as that business has also been impacted by the uncertain macroeconomic conditions in China as well as incremental integration-related costs.
2014 compared with 2013
Net sales of our International and Other segment increased $123.1 million or 13.0% in 2014 compared to 2013, reflecting volume growth of 17.0%, unfavorable net price realization of 1.7%, and an unfavorable impact from foreign currency exchange rates that reduced net sales by approximately 2.3%. The sales volume increase was primarily due to increased demand for new and existing products in China as well as $54 million of incremental sales from the newly acquired SGM business. Excluding SGM, our 2014 chocolate net sales grew 35% in China and we increased our market share to almost 10% of the chocolate category. Our 2014 sales in Mexico were unfavorably impacted by the challenging economic environment, while our Brazil performance improved sequentially as the year progressed, finishing 2014 up approximately 7% from the prior year, excluding the impact of unfavorable currency. The unfavorable price realization reflects increased trade promotions and allowances, particularly in China and Mexico where we have made additional investments to drive sales volume growth.
Our International and Other segment income decreased $4.6 million or 10.3% in 2014 compared to 2013, as the benefit from higher sales volume was more than offset by higher trade promotions and a 5.9% higher investment in advertising to support core brands and the introduction of new products in our international markets. The most significant portion of this investment was focused on our China and Mexico markets. We also increased headcount, particularly in China in support of sales growth.

2013 compared with 2012
31
Net sales of our International and Other segment increased $114.4 million or 13.8% in 2013 compared to 2012, reflecting volume growth of 17.0%, unfavorable net price realization of 2.4%, and an unfavorable impact from foreign currency exchange rates that reduced net sales by approximately 0.9%. The sales volume increase was primarily due to sales growth in China, Mexico and Brazil, while the unfavorable price realization reflects increased trade promotions and allowances, particularly in China and Mexico where we have made additional investments to drive sales volume growth.

Our International and Other segment income decreased $6.8 million or 13.2% in 2013 compared to 2012, as the benefit from higher sales volume and improved gross margins was more than offset by a 44.8% higher investment in advertising, consumer promotions and marketing expenses to support core brands and the introduction of new products in our international markets. The most significant portion of this investment was focused on our China and Mexico markets.

Unallocated Corporate Items
Unallocated corporate administration includes centrally-managed (a) corporate functional costs relating to legal, treasury, finance and human resources, (b) expenses associated with the oversight and administration of our global operations, including warehousing, distribution and manufacturing, information systems and global shared services, (c) non-cash stock-based compensation expense, and (d) other gains or losses that are not integral to segment performance.
In 2015, unallocated corporate items totaled $497.4 million compared to $503.2 million in 2014, with the reduction driven primarily by the implementation of the 2015 Productivity Initiative discussed previously.
In 2014, unallocated corporate items totaled $503.4$503.2 million compared to $533.5$535.1 million in 2013, with the reduction driven by lower incentive compensation expense as well as discretionary cost containment measures intended to mitigate the higher commodity and other input costs in 2014.
In 2013, unallocated corporate items totaled $533.5 million compared to $478.6 million in 2012, with the increase primarily a result of higher salaries, benefits and incentive compensation, higher spending on outside services and consulting, and higher legal fees and accruals.

2732


FINANCIAL CONDITION
We assess our liquidity in terms of our ability to generate cash to fund our operating, investing and financing activities. Significant factors affecting liquidity include cash flows generated from operating activities, capital expenditures, acquisitions, dividends, repurchase of outstanding shares, adequacy of available commercial paper and bank lines of credit, and the ability to attract long-term capital with satisfactory terms. We generate substantial cash from operations and remain in a strong financial position, with sufficient liquidity available for capital reinvestment, payment of dividends and strategic acquisitions.
Cash Flow Summary
The following table is derived from our Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows:
In millions of dollars 2014 2013 2012 2015 2014 2013
Net cash provided by (used in):            
Operating activities $838.2
 $1,188.4
 $1,094.8
 $1,214.5
 $844.4
 $1,191.4
Investing activities (862.6) (351.6) (473.4) (477.2) (862.6) (351.6)
Financing activities (719.3) (446.6) (586.9) (755.2) (719.3) (446.6)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents (10.4) (6.2) (3.0)
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents (743.7) 390.2
 34.5
 (28.3) (743.7) 390.2
Operating activities
Our principal source of liquidity is operating cash flows. Our net income and, consequently, our cash provided by operations are impacted by sales volume, seasonal sales patterns, timing of new product introductions, profit margins and price changes. Sales are typically higher during the third and fourth quarters of the year due to seasonal and holiday-related sales patterns. Generally, working capital needs peak during the summer months. We meet these needs primarily with cash on hand, bank borrowings or the issuance of commercial paper.
Cash provided by operating activities in 2014 decreased $350.22015 increased $370.0 million relative to 2013.2014. This declineincrease was driven by the following factors:
Working capital (comprised of inventory, accounts receivable inventory and accounts payable) generated cash of $22 million in 2015, while it consumed cash of $169 million in 2014 compared to $29 million in 2013. Higher sales volumes late2014. This fluctuation was mainly driven by lower inventory purchases in the year and slightly higher accounts receivable days sales outstanding drove higher accounts receivable balances, while bulk purchases2015 period, since certain raw material inventory had been built up at the preceding year-end to take advantage of certain ingredients at favorable pricing resulted in higher inventory balances.pricing.
The impact of ourOur hedging activities unfavorablyfavorably impacted cash flow by $55 million in 2015 versus an unfavorable impact of $78 million in 2014, versus a positive $101 million impact in 2013. This reflects the impact of non-cash gains and losses amortizeddue principally to income from accumulated other comprehensive income, coupled with the cash flow impact of market gains and losses on our commodity futures. Our cash outlaysreceipts typically increase when futures market prices are decreasing.increasing.
Lower incentive accruals and advertising and promotion accruals drove additional reductions in 2014 operating2015 cash flow relativewas favorably impacted by approximately $30 million from the timing of tax payments in 2015 compared to 2013.
Partially offsetting these declines were higher net earnings adjusted for non-cash items (depreciation and amortization, stock-based compensation, deferred income taxes, impairments and loss on disposal of business) resulting from higher sales volumes during the year.2014.
Cash provided by operating activities in 2013 increased $93.62014 decreased $347.0 million as compared to 2012,2013, primarily due to increased net earnings in 2013, partly offset by a $27$140 million incrementally higherincremental investment in working capital to support the higherhigh sales volumes.volumes, partially offset by increased net earnings in 2014. Derivative activities had a similar$78 million unfavorable impact on 20132014 operating cash flow and 2012$101 million favorable impact on 2013 operating cash flow.
Pension and Post-Retirement Activity. We recorded net periodic benefit costs of $38.2$66.8 million, $55.8$37.3 million and
$83.5 $55.0 million in2015, 2014, 2013, and 2012,2013, respectively, relating to our benefit plans (including our defined benefit and other post retirement plans). The main drivers of fluctuations in expense from year to year are assumptions in formulating our long-term estimates, including discount rates used to value plan obligations, expected returns on plan assets, the service and interest costs, and the amortization of actuarial gains and losses, as well as a $20losses. The 2015 costs also include net settlement and curtailment charges of $22.4 million, settlement loss in 2012 relating largely tothat were triggered by the Next Century program.2015 Productivity Initiative.

2833


The funded status of our qualified defined benefit pension plans is dependent upon many factors, including returns on invested assets, the level of market interest rates and the level of funding. We contribute cash to our plans at our discretion, subject to applicable regulations and minimum contribution requirements. Cash contributions to our pension and post retirement plans totaled $53.3 million, $53.1 million and $57.2 million in 2015, 2014 and $44.2 million in 2014, 2013, and 2012,
respectively.
Investing activities
Our principal uses of cash for investment purposes relate to purchases of property, plant and equipment and capitalized software, purchases of short-term investments and acquisitions of businesses, partially offset by proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment.equipment and short-term investments. We used cash of $862.6$477.2 million for investing activities in 20142015 compared to $351.6$862.6 million in 2013,2014, with the increasedecrease driven by 2014less business acquisitionsacquisition activity and proceeds from the purchasesale of short term investments. We used cash of $473.4$351.6 million for investing activities in 2012,2013, which exceeded the use in 2013 due mainlywas primarily driven by capital expenditures relating to the 2012 Brookside acquisition.Malaysia facility and the Next Century program.
Primary investing activities include the following:
Capital spending. Capital expenditures, primarily to support capacity expansion, innovation, and cost savings, were $329.7 million in 2015, $345.9 million in 2014 and $323.6 million in 2013 and $258.7 million in 2012.2013. Our 20142015 expenditures include $115included approximately $80 million relating to the construction of a manufacturing facility in Malaysia, compared to $40$115 million in 2013.2014. Capital expenditures in 2013 included $40 million relating to the Malaysia facility and 2012 included $11.8 million and $74.7 million, respectively, relating to the Next Century program. Capitalized software additions were primarily related to ongoing enhancements of our information systems. We expect 20152016 capital expenditures, including capitalized software, to approximate $375$285 million to $400 million, of which $90 million to $110 million relates to the facility in Malaysia.$295 million.
Acquisitions. In 2015, we spent $218.7 million to acquire Krave. In 2014, we spent $396.3 million to acquire three businesses, including $379.7 million for SGM and $26.6 million for Allan, partially offset by net cash received of $10.0 million relating to the LSFC acquisition, whereby cash acquired in the transaction exceeded the $5.6 million paid for the controlling interest. In 2012, we acquired Brookside for approximately $172.9 million. See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding our recent acquisitions.
Financing activities
Our cash flow from financing activities generally relates to the use of cash for purchases of our Common Stock and payment of dividends, offset by net borrowing activity and proceeds from the exercise of stock options. We used cash of $719.3$755.2 million for financing activities in 20142015 compared to $446.6$719.3 million in 2013,2014, with the increase due mainly to higher dividend payments and share repurchases,repayments of long term debt and short term borrowings, offset in part by higher shortproceeds from the issuance of long term borrowings. WeOur cash used in 2014 exceeded our cash of $586.9 millionused for financing activities in 2012, which exceeded the use in 2013 by $272.7 million, primarily due to higher dividend payments and share repurchases, offset in part by higher proceeds from the exercise of stock options and lower dividend payments.repurchases.
The majority of our financing activity was attributed to the following:
Short-term borrowings, net. In addition to utilizing cash on hand, we use short-term borrowings (commercial paper and bank borrowings) to fund seasonal working capital requirements and ongoing business needs. In 2015, we generated cash flow of $10.7 million from higher borrowings at certain of our international businesses. In 2014, we generated additional cash flow from the issuance of $55.0 million in commercial paper, as well as incrementally higher borrowings at certain of our international businesses in support of sales growth.paper.
Long-term debt borrowings and repayments. In 2015, we used $355 million to repay long-term debt, including $100.2 million to repurchase $71.6 million of our long-term debt as part of a cash tender offer. Additionally, in 2015, we issued $300 million of 1.60% Notes due in 2018 and $300 million of 3.20% Notes due in 2025. We had no repayment activity in 2014. In 2013, we repaid $250 million of 5.0% Notes due in 2013 and issued $250 million of 2.625% Notes due in 2023. In August 2012, we repaid $92.5 million of 6.95% Notes due in 2012.
Share repurchases. We repurchase shares of Common Stock to offset the dilutive impact of treasury shares issued under our equity compensation plans. The value of these share repurchases in a given period varies based on the volume of stock options exercised and our market price. In addition, we periodically repurchase shares of Common Stock pursuant to Board-authorized programs intended to drive additional stockholder value. In 2014, weWe used cash for total share repurchases of $582.5 million in 2015, compared to $576.5 million in

34


2014. This includes purchases pursuant to authorized programs of $402.5 million to purchase 4.2 million shares in 2015 and $202.3 million to purchase 2.1 million shares pursuant to authorized programs, while wein 2014. We had no share repurchases under these programs in 2013. In 2012, we repurchased 2.1 million shares for $124.9 million pursuant to authorized programs. As of December 31, 2014,2015, approximately $173$20 million

29


remained available under the $250 million share repurchase authorization approved by the Board in February 2014.2015. In January 2016, our Board of Directors approved an additional $500 million share repurchase authorization, to commence after the existing 2015 authorization is completed.
Dividend payments. Total dividend payments to holders of our Common Stock and Class B Common Stock were $476.1 million in 2015, $440.4 million in 2014 and $393.8 million in 2013 and $341.2 million in 2012.2013. Dividends per share of Common Stock increased 13%9.6% to $2.236 per share in 2015 compared to $2.04 per share in 2014, compared to $1.81 per share in 2013, while dividends per share of Class B Common Stock increased 13%.10.3% in 2015.
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options, including tax benefits. We received $175.8$97.6 million from employee exercises of stock options, including excess tax benefits, in 2014,2015, as compared to $175.8 million in 2014 and $195.7 million in 2013 and $295.5 million in 2012.2013. Variances are driven by the number of shares exercised and the share price at the date of grant.
Other. In September 2012,2015, we acquired the remaining 49% interest in Godrej Hershey Ltd.do Brasil under a cooperative agreement with Pandurata Netherlands B.V. (“Bauducco”) for approximately $15.8$38.3 million. Since MayAdditionally, in December 2015, we paid $10.0 million in contingent consideration to the shareholders of 2007, we had owned a 51% controlling interest on the basis of an agreement with Godrej Beverages and Foods, Ltd., a consumer goods, confectionery and food company, to manufacture and distribute confectionery products, snacks and beverages across India.Krave.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At December 31, 2015, our cash and cash equivalents totaled $346.5 million. At December 31, 2014, our cash and cash equivalents totaled $374.9 million, and we held short-term investments in the form of term deposits with original maturities of one-year totaling $97.1 million. In total, our cash and short-term investmentsinvestment holdings at the end of 2015 declined $646.5$125.5 million compared to the 20132014 year-end balance of $1.1 billion as a result of the net uses of cash outlined in the previous discussion.
Approximately half of the balance of our cash and cash equivalents and short term investments at December 31, 20142015 was held by subsidiaries domiciled outside of the United States. If these amounts held outside of the United States were to be repatriated, under current law they would be subject to U.S. federal income taxes, less applicable foreign tax credits. However, our intent is to permanently reinvest these funds outside of the United States. The cash that our foreign subsidiaries hold for indefinite reinvestment is expected to be used to finance foreign operations and investments. We believe we have sufficient liquidity to satisfy our cash needs, including our cash needs in the United States.
We maintain debt levels we consider prudent based on our cash flow, interest coverage ratio and percentage of debt to capital. We use debt financing to lower our overall cost of capital which increases our return on stockholders’ equity. Our total debt was $2.4 billion at December 31, 2015 and $2.2 billion at December 31, 2014 and $2.0 billion at December 31, 2013.2014. Our total debt increased in 20142015 mainly due to the increase inadditional debt issued mid-year to repay commercial paper outstanding, additional debt assumed in the SGM acquisition and additional short-term borrowingsthat had been used to fund growththe Krave acquisition in our existing China operations.the first quarter of 2015.
In October 2011, we entered into a five-year agreement establishing an unsecured revolving credit facility to borrow up to $1.1 billion, with an option to increase borrowings by an additional $400 million with the consent of the lenders. In November 2013, this agreement was amended to reduce the amount of borrowings available under the unsecured revolving credit facility to $1.0 billion, maintain the option to increase borrowings by an additional $400 million with the consent of the lenders, and extend the termination date to November 2018. In November 2014,As of December 31, 2015, the termination date of this agreement washas been extended an additional year to November 2019.2020. As of December 31, 2014,2015, $1.0 billion was available to borrow under the agreement and no borrowings were outstanding. The unsecured revolving credit agreement contains certain financial and other covenants, customary representations, warranties and events of default. We were in compliance with all covenants as of December 31, 2014.2015. We may use these funds for general corporate purposes, including commercial paper backstop and business acquisitions.
In addition to the revolving credit facility, we maintain lines of credit in various currencies with domestic and international commercial banks. As of December 31, 2014,2015, we had available capacity of $117.9$203.4 million under these lines of credit.

35


Furthermore, we have a current shelf registration statement filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission that allows for the issuance of an indeterminate amount of debt securities. Proceeds from the debt issuances and any other offerings under the current registration statement may be used for general corporate

30


requirements, including reducing existing borrowings, financing capital additions, and funding contributions to our pension plans, future business acquisitions and working capital requirements.
Our ability to obtain debt financing at comparable risk-based interest rates is partly a function of our existing cash-flow-to-debt and debt-to-capitalization levels as well as our current credit standing.
We believe that our existing sources of liquidity are adequate to meet anticipated funding needs at comparable risk-based interest rates for the foreseeable future. Acquisition spending and/or share repurchases could potentially increase our debt. Operating cash flow and access to capital markets are expected to satisfy our various cash flow requirements, including acquisitions and capital expenditures.
Equity Structure
We have two classes of stock outstanding – Common Stock and Class B Common Stock (“Class B Stock”). Holders of the Common Stock and the Class B Stock generally vote together without regard to class on matters submitted to stockholders, including the election of directors. Holders of the Common Stock have 1 vote per share. Holders of the Class B Stock have 10 votes per share. Holders of the Common Stock, voting separately as a class, are entitled to elect one-sixth of our Board. With respect to dividend rights, holders of the Common Stock are entitled to cash dividends 10% higher than those declared and paid on the Class B Stock.
Hershey Trust Company, as trustee for the benefit of Milton Hershey School, maintains voting control over The Hershey Company. In addition, Hershey Trust Company currently has three representatives who are members of the Company's Board, one of whom is the Chairman of the Board.Lead Independent Director. These representatives, from time to time in performing their responsibilities on the Company’s Board, may exercise influence with regard to the ongoing business decisions of our Board or management. Hershey Trust Company, as trustee for the benefit of Milton Hershey School, in its role as controlling stockholder of the Company, has indicated it intends to retain its controlling interest in The Hershey Company and that the Company Board, and not the Hershey Trust Company board, is solely responsible and accountable for the Company’s management and performance.
Pennsylvania law requires that the Office of Attorney General be provided advance notice of any transaction that would result in Hershey Trust Company, as trustee for the benefit of Milton Hershey School, no longer having voting control of the Company. The law provides specific statutory authority for the Attorney General to intercede and petition the Court having jurisdiction over the Hershey Trust Company, as trustee for the benefit of Milton Hershey School, to stop such a transaction if the Attorney General can prove that the transaction is unnecessary for the future economic viability of the Company and is inconsistent with investment and management considerations under fiduciary obligations. This legislation makes it more difficult for a third party to acquire a majority of our outstanding voting stock and thereby may delay or prevent a change in control of the Company.
Guarantees and Other Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements    
We do not have guarantees or other off-balance sheet financing arrangements, including variable interest entities, which we believe could have a material impact on our financial condition or liquidity.

3136


Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations at December 31, 2014:2015:
 Payments due by Period Payments due by Period
 In millions of dollars In millions of dollars
Contractual Obligations Total Less than 1 year 1-3 years 3-5 years More than 5 years Total Less than 1 year 1-3 years 3-5 years More than 5 years
Long-term debt $1,799.8
 $250.8
 $507.8
 $2.1
 $1,039.1
 $2,057.0
 $499.9
 $300.4
 $350.8
 $905.9
Interest expense (1) 491.1
 73.7
 117.3
 106.7
 193.4
 457.3
 73.6
 118.2
 111.8
 153.7
Lease obligations (2) 56.2
 28.2
 23.0
 4.1
 0.9
 28.2
 12.6
 13.3
 1.6
 0.7
Minimum pension plan funding obligations (3) 11.9
 1.1
 3.6
 4.8
 2.4
 12.1
 0.8
 4.7
 4.4
 2.2
Unconditional purchase obligations (4) 2,122.3
 1,298.8
 756.7
 66.8
 —
 2,333.4
 1,343.1
 967.9
 22.4
 —
Other (5) 100.2
 100.2
 —
 —
 —
Total Obligations $4,581.5
 $1,752.8
 $1,408.4
 $184.5
 $1,235.8
Total obligations $4,888.0
 $1,930.0
 $1,404.5
 $491.0
 $1,062.5
(1) Includes the net interest payments on fixed and variable rate debt and associated interest rate swaps. Interest associated with variable rate debt was forecasted using the LIBOR forward curve as of December 31, 2014.2015.
(2) Includes the minimum rental commitments under non-cancelable operating leases primarily for offices, retail stores, warehouses and distribution facilities, and certain equipment. We do not have material capital lease obligations.
(3) Represents future pension payments to comply with local funding requirements. Our policy is to fund domestic pension liabilities in accordance with the minimum and maximum limits imposed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), federal income tax laws and the funding requirements of the Pension Protection Act of 2006. We fund non-domestic pension liabilities in accordance with laws and regulations applicable to those plans. For more information, see Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(4) Purchase obligations consist primarily of fixed commitments for the purchase of raw materials to be utilized in the normal course of business. Amounts presented included fixed price forward contracts and unpriced contracts that were valued using market prices as of December 31, 2014.2015. The amounts presented in the table do not include items already recorded in accounts payable or accrued liabilities at year-end 2014,2015, nor does the table reflect cash flows we are likely to incur based on our plans, but are not obligated to incur. Such amounts are part of normal operations and are reflected in historical operating cash flow trends. We do not believe such purchase obligations will adversely affect our liquidity position.
(5) Represents liability to purchase the remaining 20% of the outstanding shares of SGM. See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details.
In entering into contractual obligations, we have assumed the risk that might arise from the possible inability of counterparties to meet the terms of their contracts. We mitigate this risk by performing financial assessments prior to contract execution, conducting periodic evaluations of counterparty performance and maintaining a diverse portfolio of qualified counterparties. Our risk is limited to replacing the contracts at prevailing market rates. We do not expect any significant losses resulting from counterparty defaults.
Plant Construction Obligations
In December 2013, we entered into an agreement for the construction of a new confectionery manufacturing plant in Malaysia. The total cost of construction is expected to be approximately $265 to $275 million. The plant is expected to begin operations in the second half of 2015.
Asset Retirement Obligations
We have a number of facilities that contain varying amounts of asbestos in certain locations within the facilities. Our asbestos management program is compliant with current applicable regulations, which require that we handle or dispose of asbestos in a specialspecified manner if such facilities undergo major renovations or are demolished. Costs associated with the removal of asbestos related to the closure of a manufacturing facility under the Next Century program were recorded primarily in 2012 and included in business realignment and impairment charges. The costs associated with the removal of asbestos from the facility were not material. With regard to other facilities, we do not have sufficient information to estimate the fair value of any asset retirement obligations related to these facilities. We cannot specify the settlement date or range of potential settlement dates and, therefore, sufficient information is not

32


available to apply an expected present value technique. We expect to maintain the facilities with repairs and maintenance activities that would not involve or require the removal of significant quantities of asbestos.
Income Tax Obligations
Liabilities for unrecognized income tax benefits are excluded from the table above as we are unable to reasonably predict the ultimate amount or timing of a settlement of these potential liabilities. See Note 7 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for more information.

37


CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
The preparation of financial statements requires management to use judgment and make estimates and assumptions. We believe that our most critical accounting policies and estimates relate to the following:
lAccrued Liabilities for Trade Promotion Activities
lPension and Other Post-Retirement Benefits Plans
lGoodwill and Other Intangible Assets
lCommodities Futures and Options Contracts
lIncome Taxes
Management has discussed the development, selection and disclosure of critical accounting policies and estimates with the Audit Committee of our Board. While we base estimates and assumptions on our knowledge of current events and actions we may undertake in the future, actual results may ultimately differ from these estimates and assumptions. Other significant accounting policies are outlined in Note 1 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Accrued Liabilities for Trade Promotion Activities
We promote our products with advertising, trade promotions and consumer incentives. These programs include, but are not limited to, discounts, coupons, rebates, in-store display incentives and volume-based incentives. We expense advertising costs and other direct marketing expenses as incurred. We recognize the costs of trade promotion and consumer incentive activities as a reduction to net sales along with a corresponding accrued liability based on estimates at the time of revenue recognition. These estimates are based on our analysis of the programs offered, historical trends, expectations regarding customer and consumer participation, sales and payment trends and our experience with payment patterns associated with similar programs offered in the past.
Our trade promotional costs totaled $1,122.3 million, $1,125.5 million and $995.7 million in 2015, 2014 and $949.3 million in 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively. The estimated costs of these programs are reasonably likely to change in the future due to changes in trends with regard to customer and consumer participation, particularly for new programs and for programs related to the introduction of new products. Differences between estimated expense and actual program performance are recognized as a change in estimate in a subsequent period and are normally not significant. Over the three-year period ended December 31, 2014,2015, actual promotional costs have not deviated from the estimated amount for a given year by more than approximately 3%.
Pension and Other Post-Retirement Benefits Plans
We sponsor various defined benefit pension plans. The primary plans are The Hershey Company Retirement Plan and The Hershey Company Retirement Plan for Hourly Employees, which are cash balance plans that provide pension benefits for most U.S. employees hired prior to January 1, 2007. We also sponsor two primary other post-employment benefit (“OPEB”) plans, consisting of a health care plan and life insurance plan for retirees. The health care plan is contributory, with participants’ contributions adjusted annually, and the life insurance plan is non-contributory.
For accounting purposes, the defined benefit pension and OPEB plans require assumptions to estimate the projected and accumulated benefit obligations, including the following variables: discount rate; expected salary increases; certain employee-related factors, such as turnover, retirement age and mortality; expected return on assets; and health care cost trend rates. These and other assumptions affect the annual expense and obligations recognized for the underlying plans. Our assumptions reflect our historical experiences and management's best judgment regarding future expectations.

3338


The net periodic benefit costs relating to our pension and OPEB plans were as follows:
For the years ended December 31, 2014 2013 2012 2015 2014 2013
In millions of dollars            
Pension plans            
Service cost and amortization of prior service cost (1) $26.3
 $31.8
 $31.6
 $27.1
 $26.3
 $31.8
Interest cost, expected return on plan assets and amortization of net loss (1.9) 11.2
 16.7
 5.9
 (1.9) 11.2
Administrative expenses 0.8
 0.7
 0.5
Curtailment and settlement loss (credit) —
 (0.4) 19.7
 22.4
 —
 (0.4)
Net periodic pension benefit cost $25.2
 $43.3
 $68.5
 $55.4
 $24.4
 $42.6
OPEB plans            
Net periodic other post-retirement benefit cost $13.0
 $12.5
 $15.1
 $11.5
 $12.9
 $12.4
(1) We believe that the service cost and amortization of prior service cost components of net periodic pension benefit cost reflect the ongoing operating cost of our pension plans, particularly since our most significant plans were closed to most new entrants after 2007.
Actuarial gains and losses may arise when actual experience differs from assumed experience or when we revise the actuarial assumptions used to value the plans’ obligations. We only amortize the unrecognized net actuarial gains and losses in excess of 10% of a respective plan’s projected benefit obligation, or the fair market value of assets, if greater. The estimated recognized net actuarial loss component of net periodic pension benefit expense for 20152016 is $32.3$35.2 million. The 20142015 recognized net actuarial loss component of net periodic pension benefit expense was $23.4$30.5 million. Projections beyond 2014 are dependent on a variety of factors such as changes to the discount rate and the actual return on pension plan assets.
The weighted-average assumptions for our pension and OPEB plans were as follows:
 2014 2013 2012 2015 2014 2013
Pension plans            
Expense discount rate 4.5% 3.7% 4.5% 3.7% 4.5% 3.7%
Benefit obligation discount rate 3.7% 4.5% 3.7% 4.0% 3.7% 4.5%
Expected return on plan assets 7.0% 7.75% 8.0% 6.3% 7.0% 7.8%
Expected rate of salary increases 4.0% 4.0% 4.1% 4.1% 4.0% 4.0%
OPEB plans            
Expense discount rate 4.5% 3.7% 4.5% 3.7% 4.5% 3.7%
Benefit obligation discount rate 3.7% 4.5% 3.7% 4.0% 3.7% 4.5%
To determine the expected return on our pension plan assets, we consider the current asset allocations, as well as historical and expected returns on the categories of plan assets. The historical average return over the 2728 years prior to December 31, 20142015 was approximately 8.7%8.3%. The actual return on assets was 8.4%(2.3%), 16.7%8.4% and 13.2%16.7% for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 2013 and 2012,2013, respectively. Our investment policies specify ranges oftarget allocation percentages for each asset class. The current estimated asset return is based upon the following targeted asset allocation for our domestic pension plans:plans as of December 31, 2015:
  Target Allocation Range
Asset Class 2014 2013
Equity securities 40% – 60% 55% – 75%
Debt securities 40% – 60% 25% – 45%
Cash and certain other investments 0% – 5% 0% – 5%
Our expected return on plan assets has been reduced to reflect the lower proportion of plan assets allocated to equity securities.
Asset ClassTarget Asset Allocation
Equity securities50%
Debt securities49%
Cash1%

3439


Sensitivity of Assumptions
Since pension and OPEB liabilities are measured on a discounted basis, the discount rate impacts our plan obligations and expenses. The discount rate used for our pension and OPEB plans is based on a yield curve constructed from a portfolio of high-quality bonds for which the timing and amount of cash flows approximate the estimated payouts of the plans. A 100 basis point decline in the weighted average pension discount rate would increase net periodic pension benefit expense by approximately $4.5$4.7 million. A decrease in the OPEB discount rate by 100 basis points would decrease annual OPEB expense by approximately $1.3$0.5 million. For the OPEB plans, a decrease in the discount rate assumption would result in a decrease in benefit cost because of the lower interest cost, which would more than offset the impact of the lower discount rate assumption on the post-retirement benefit obligation.
The expected return on plan assets assumption impacts our defined benefit expense, since certain of our defined benefit pension plans are partially funded. For 2015,2016, we reduced the expected rate of return assumption to 6.3%6.1% from the 7.0%6.3% assumption used in 2014,2015, to reflect the revised target equity allocation of 50%.lower expected long-term returns due to slowing growth in developed and emerging markets. The process for setting the expected rates of return is described in Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. A 100 basis point decrease or increase in the rate of return for pension assets would correspondingly increase or decrease annual net periodic pension benefit expense by approximately $10.6$11.0 million.
For year-end 2014,2015, we adopted the Society of Actuaries updated RP-2014 mortality tables with MP-2014MP-2015 generational projection scales; however, adoption of these tables did not have a significant impact on our pension obligations or net period benefit cost since our primary plans are cash balance plans and most participants take lump-sum settlements upon retirement.
Funding
We fund domestic pension liabilities in accordance with the limits imposed by ERISA, federal income tax laws and the funding requirements of the Pension Protection Act of 2006. We fund non-domestic pension liabilities in accordance with laws and regulations applicable to those plans. For 2014 and 2013,The annual minimum cash funding requirements for theour plans wereare not material. However, we made contributions of $32.9 million in 2015 and $29.4 million in 2014, and $32.3including $22.9 million in 2013, including2015 and $22.0 million in 2014 and $25.0 million in 2013 to improvemaintain the funded status of our domestic plans as well as contributions to pay benefits under our non-qualified pension plans in both years. These contributions were fully tax deductible. For 2015, minimum funding requirements for our pension plans are approximately $1.1 million and weWe expect to make additional contributions of approximately $23.6$18.5 million to improve the funded status of our domestic plans.plans in 2016.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are not amortized, but are evaluated for impairment annually or more often if indicators of a potential impairment are present. Our annual impairment tests are conducted at the beginning of the fourth quarter. Our 2014 analysis excluded goodwill and other intangible assets related to the SGM acquisition that was completed on September 26, 2014, just prior to our annual testing date.
We use a two-step process to quantitatively evaluate goodwill for impairment. In the first step, we compare the fair value of each reporting unit with the carrying amount of the reporting unit, including goodwill. If the estimated fair value of the reporting unit is less than the carrying amount of the reporting unit, we complete a second step to determine the amount of the goodwill impairment that we should record. In the second step, we determine an implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill by allocating the reporting unit’s fair value to all of its assets and liabilities other than goodwill (including any unrecognized intangible assets). We compare the resulting implied fair value of the goodwill to the carrying amount and record an impairment charge for the difference. We test individual indefinite-lived intangible assets by comparing the estimated fair value with the book values of each asset.
We determine the fair value of our reporting units and indefinite-lived intangible assets using an income approach. Under the income approach, we calculate the fair value of our reporting units and indefinite-lived intangible assets based on the present value of estimated future cash flows. Considerable management judgment is necessary to evaluate the impact of operating and macroeconomic changes and to estimate the future cash flows used to measure fair value. Our estimates of future cash flows consider past performance, current and anticipated market conditions and internal projections and operating plans which incorporate estimates for sales growth and profitability, and cash flows associated with taxes and capital spending. Additional assumptions include forecasted growth rates, estimated

35


discount rates, which may be risk-adjusted for the operating market of the reporting unit, and estimated royalty rates that would be charged for comparable branded licenses. We believe such assumptions also reflect current and anticipated market conditions and are consistent with those that would be used by other marketplace participants for

40


similar valuation purposes. Such assumptions are subject to change due to changing economic and competitive conditions.
At December 31, 2014, the book value of our goodwill totaled $793 million and related to six reporting units (including SGM which was excluded from 2014 testing as noted above). The percentage of excess fair value over carrying value was at least 50% for each of our tested reporting units, with the exception of our India reporting unit, whose estimated fair value approximated its carrying value. As a result and given the sensitivity of the India impairment analysis to changes in the underlying assumptions, we performed a step two analysis which indicated a goodwill impairment of $11.4 million. Our 2014 annual test of indefinite-lived intangible assets resulted in a $4.5 million pre-tax write-down of a trademark, also associated with the India business. These impairment charges were recorded in the fourth quarter.
We also have intangible assets, consisting primarily of certain trademarks, customer-related intangible assets and patents obtained through business acquisitions, that are expected to have determinable useful lives. The costs of finite-lived intangible assets are amortized to expense over their estimated lives. Our estimates of the useful lives of finite-lived intangible assets consider judgments regarding the future effects of obsolescence, demand, competition and other economic factors. We conduct impairment tests when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of these finite-lived assets may not be recoverable. Undiscounted cash flow analyses are used to determine if an impairment exists. If an impairment is determined to exist, the loss is calculated based on the estimated fair value of the assets.
No additional impairments were indicated byAs discussed in Note 2, based on the declining performance levels and the results of our post-acquisition assessment, we determined that an interim impairment test of the SGM reporting unit was required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. We performed the first step of this test as of July 5, 2015 using an income approach based on our estimates of future performance scenarios for the business. The results of this test indicated that the fair value of the reporting unit was less than the carrying amount as of the measurement date, suggesting that a goodwill impairment was probable, which required us to perform a second step analysis to confirm that an impairment existed and to determine the amount of the impairment based on our reassessed value of the reporting unit. Although preliminary, as a result of this reassessment, in the second quarter of 2015 we recorded an estimated $249.8 million non-cash goodwill impairment charge, representing a write-down of all of the goodwill related to the SGM reporting unit as of July 5, 2015. During the third quarter, we increased the value of acquired goodwill by $16.6 million, with the corresponding offset principally represented by the establishment of additional opening balance sheet liabilities for additional commitments and contingencies that were identified through our post-acquisition assessment. We also finalized the impairment test of the goodwill relating to the SGM reporting unit, which resulted in a write-off of this additional goodwill in the third quarter, for a total impairment of $266.4 million. We also tested the other long-lived assets of SGM for recoverability by comparing the sum of the undiscounted cash flows to the carrying value of the asset group, and no impairment was indicated.
In connection with the SGM acquisition, we assigned approximately $15 million of goodwill to our existing China chocolate business, as this reporting unit was expected to benefit from acquisition synergies relating to the sale of Golden Monkey-branded product through its Tier 1 and hypermarket distributor networks. As the net sales and earnings of our China business continued to be adversely impacted by macroeconomic challenges and changing consumer shopping behavior through the third quarter, we determined that an interim impairment test of the goodwill in this reporting unit was also required. We performed the first step of this test in the third quarter of 2015 using an income approach based on our estimates of future performance scenarios for the business. The results of this test suggested that a goodwill impairment was probable, and the conclusions of the second step analysis resulted in a write-down of $14.4 million, representing the full value of goodwill attributed to this reporting unit as of October 4, 2015. We also tested the other long-lived assets of the China asset group for recoverability by comparing the sum of the undiscounted cash flows to the carrying value of the asset group, and no impairment was indicated.
At December 31, 2015, after considering the impairments noted above, the remaining net book value of our goodwill totaled $684.3 million and related to seven reporting units. As it relates to our annual testing performed at the beginning of the fourth quarter, no additional goodwill impairment was indicated, and the percentage of excess fair value over carrying value was at least 50% for each of our tested reporting units, with the exception of our Krave reporting unit, which includes goodwill of $147.1 million. This reporting unit comprises a recently acquired business whose estimated fair value approximates its carrying value.
During our 2014 annual testing, the fair value of our India reporting unit approximated its carrying value. As a result and given the sensitivity of the India impairment analysis to changes in the underlying assumptions, we performed a step two analysis which indicated a goodwill impairment of $11.4 million. In addition, our 2014 annual test of indefinite-lived intangible assets resulted in a $4.5 million pre-tax write-down of a trademark, also associated with the India business. Also in 2014, or 2013. However, in connection with the anticipated sale of our Mauna Loa business (as discussed in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements), during the third and fourth quarters of 2014, we recorded estimated impairment charges totaling $18.5 million to write-down goodwill and an indefinite-lived trademark intangible asset, based on the valuation of these assets as implied by the agreed-upon sales price.

41


Commodities Futures and Options Contracts
As discussed in Note 1 and Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, we use derivative financial instruments to manage a number of our market risks. Specifically, we use commodities futures and options contracts, in combination with forward purchasing of cocoa products and other commodities, to manage our commodity price risk, which represents a significant market risk exposure for us. Because commodity costs comprise a significant portion of our cost of sales, we typically apply
We have historically applied hedge accounting to our commodity derivative instruments to enable us to reduce the effect of future price increases and provide visibility to future costs.
instruments. In order to qualify for hedge accounting, a specified level of hedging effectiveness between the derivative instrument and the item being hedged must exist at inception and throughout the hedged period. We must formally document the nature of and relationship between the derivative and the hedged item, as well as our risk management objectives, strategies for undertaking the hedge transaction and method of assessing hedge effectiveness. We must also maintain certain operational processes and controls that support the conduct of our commodities hedging program. Additionally, since these are typically hedges of forecasted transactions, the significant characteristics and expected terms of the forecasted transactions must be specifically identified, and it must be probable that the forecasted transactions will occur. If it is no longer probable that a hedged forecasted transaction will occur, we would recognize the gain or loss related to the derivative in earnings.
Because we generally designatehave designated these commodity future and option contracts as derivative instruments in cash flow hedging relationships, our mark-to-market gains (losses) were deferred to accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”). The amounts deferred and reclassified from AOCI were as follows:

36


For the years ended December 31, 2014 2013 2012 2015 2014 2013
In millions of dollars            
Net gains (losses) deferred to AOCI for commodity cash flow hedging derivatives $(11.2) $84.7
 $12.8
 $84.4
 $(11.2) $84.7
Gains (losses) reclassified from AOCI to earnings 68.5
 (8.4) (90.9) 40.6
 68.5
 (8.4)
Hedge ineffectiveness gains recognized in income, before tax 2.5
 3.2
 0.7
 1.0
 2.5
 3.2

As discussed in Item 9A. Controls and Procedures, our cocoa commodity derivatives did not qualify for hedge accounting treatment as of the beginning of the third quarter of 2015. Therefore, changes in the fair value of cocoa commodity derivatives for the third and fourth quarters of 2015 were recorded as incurred within cost of sales in the income statement.

Effective January 1, 2016, we are no longer electing to designate any of our existing or new cocoa or other commodity derivatives for hedge accounting treatment. Additionally, we have revised our definition of segment income and redefined non-GAAP income and earnings per share measures to exclude gains and losses on commodity derivatives until the related inventory is sold. This change to our definition of segment income and non-GAAP income and non-GAAP earnings per share will continue to reflect the derivative gains and losses with the underlying economic exposure being hedged and thereby eliminate the mark-to-market volatility within our reported segment income as well as non-GAAP income and non-GAAP earnings per share.
Income Taxes
We base our deferred income taxes, accrued income taxes and provision for income taxes upon income, statutory tax rates, the legal structure of our Company, and interpretation of tax laws.laws and tax planning opportunities available to us in the various jurisdictions in which we operate. We file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state and foreign jurisdictions. We are regularly audited by federal, state and foreign tax authorities, but a number of years may elapse before an uncertain tax position, for which we have unrecognized tax benefits, is audited and finally resolved. From time to time, these audits result in assessments of additional tax. We maintain reserves for such assessments.
We apply a more-likely-than-not threshold to the recognition and derecognition of uncertain tax positions. Accordingly, we recognize the amount of tax benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being ultimately realized upon settlement. Future changes in judgments and estimates related to the expected ultimate resolution of uncertain tax positions will affect income in the quarter of such change. While it is often difficult to predict the final

42


outcome or the timing of resolution of any particular uncertain tax position, we believe that our unrecognized tax benefits reflect the most likely outcome. Accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits are included in income tax expense. We adjust these unrecognized tax benefits, as well as the related interest, in light of changing facts and circumstances, such as receiving audit assessments or clearing of an item for which a reserve has been established. Settlement of any particular position could require the use of cash. Favorable resolution would be recognized as a reduction to our effective income tax rate in the period of resolution.
We believe it is more likely than not that the results of future operations will generate sufficient taxable income to realize the deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowances. Valuation allowances are recorded for deferred income taxes when it is more likely than not that a tax benefit will not be realized. ValuationOur valuation allowances are primarily associated with temporary differences related to advertising and promotions, as well as taxU.S. capital loss carryforwards from operations inand various foreign jurisdictions' net operating loss carryforwards and other deferred tax jurisdictions.

assets for which we do not expect to realize a benefit.  
Item 7A.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We use certain derivative instruments to manage our interest rate, foreign currency exchange rate, and commodity price risks. We monitor and manage these exposures as part of our overall risk management program.
We enter into interest rate swap agreements and foreign currency forward exchange contracts and options for periods consistent with related underlying exposures. We enter into commodities futures and options contracts and other derivative instruments for varying periods. These commodity derivative instruments are intended to be, and are effective as, economic hedges of market price risks associated with anticipated raw material purchases, energy requirements and transportation costs. We do not hold or issue derivative instruments for trading purposes and are not a party to any instruments with leverage or prepayment features.
In entering into these contracts, we have assumed the risk that might arise from the possible inability of counterparties to meet the terms of their contracts. We mitigate this risk by entering into exchange-traded contracts with collateral posting requirements and/or by performing financial assessments prior to contract execution, conducting periodic evaluations of counterparty performance and maintaining a diverse portfolio of qualified counterparties. We do not expect any significant losses from counterparty defaults.
Refer to Note 1 and Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of these derivative instruments and our hedging policies.

37


Interest Rate Risk
In order to manage interest rate exposure, we periodically enter into interest rate swap agreements. We are currently using forward starting interest rate swap agreements to reduce interest volatility associated with certain anticipated debt issues and fixed-to-floating interest rate swaps to achieve a desired proportion of variable versus fixed rate debt, based on current and projected market conditions. The notional amount, interest payment and maturity date of these swaps generally match the principal, interest payment and maturity date of the related debt, and the swaps are valued using observable benchmark rates.
The total notional amount of interest rate swaps outstanding at December 31, 2015 and 2014 was $850 million and 2013 was $1.2 billion, and $250 million, respectively. The notional amount at December 31, 2014,2015, includes $450$350 million of fixed-to-floating interest rate swaps which convert a comparable amount of fixed-rate debt to variable rate debt. A hypothetical 100 basis point increase in interest rates applied to this now variable rate debt as of December 31, 20142015 would have increased interest expense by approximately $3.6 million for the full year 2015 and $4.6 million for the full year 2014. We had minimal variable rate interest exposure as of December 31, 2013.
We consider our current risk related to market fluctuations in interest rates on our remaining debt portfolio, excluding fixed-rate debt converted to variable with fixed-to-floating instruments, to be minimal since this debt is largely long-term and fixed-rate in nature. Generally, the fair market value of fixed-rate debt will increase as interest rates fall and decrease as interest rates rise. A 100 basis point increase in market interest rates would decrease the 2014 year-end fair value of our fixed-rate long-term debt at December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 by approximately $83 million.$76 million and $57 million, respectively. However, since we currently have no plans to repurchase our outstanding fixed-rate instruments before their maturities, the impact of market interest rate fluctuations on our long-term debt does not affect our results of operations or financial position.

43


Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk
We are exposed to currency fluctuations related to manufacturing or selling products in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. We may enter into foreign currency forward exchange contracts and options to reduce fluctuations in our long or short currency positions relating primarily to purchase commitments or forecasted purchases for equipment, raw materials and finished goods denominated in foreign currencies. We also may hedge payment of forecasted intercompany transactions with our subsidiaries outside of the United States. We generally hedge foreign currency price risks for periods from 3 to 24 months.
A summary of foreign currency forward exchange contracts and the corresponding amounts at contracted forward rates is as follows:
December 31, 2014 2013
  
Contract
Amount
 
Primary
Currencies
 
Contract
Amount
 
Primary
Currencies
In millions of dollars        
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts to purchase foreign currencies $21.9
 Euros $158.4
 Malaysian ringgits
Swiss francs
Euros
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts to sell foreign currencies $48.8
 Canadian dollars
Brazilian reals
Japanese yen		 $2.8
 Japanese yen
In 2013, foreign currency forward exchange contracts for the purchase of Malaysian ringgits and certain other currencies were associated with the construction of the manufacturing facility in Malaysia.
December 31, 2015 2014
  
Contract
Amount
 
Primary
Currencies
 
Contract
Amount
 
Primary
Currencies
In millions of dollars        
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts to purchase foreign currencies $19.8
 Euros $21.9
 Euros
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts to sell foreign currencies $11.9
 Brazilian reals
Japanese yen		 $48.8
 Canadian dollars
Brazilian reals
Japanese yen
The fair value of foreign currency forward exchange contracts represents the difference between the contracted and current market foreign currency exchange rates at the end of the period. We estimate the fair value of foreign currency forward exchange contracts on a quarterly basis by obtaining market quotes of spot and forward rates for contracts with similar terms, adjusted where necessary for maturity differences. At December 31, 20142015 and 2013,2014, the net fair value of these instruments was a liability of $0.1 million and an asset of $1.5 million and $3.2 million, respectively. Assuming an unfavorable 10% change in year-end foreign currency exchange rates, the fair value of these instruments would have declined by $3.2 million and $7.0 million, and $12.9 million, respectively. Our risk related to foreign currency forward exchange contracts is limited to the cost of replacing the contracts at prevailing market rates.

38


Commodities—Price Risk Management and Futures Contracts
Our most significant raw material requirements include cocoa products, sugar, dairy products, peanuts and almonds. The cost of cocoa products and prices for related futures contracts and costs for certain other raw materials historically have been subject to wide fluctuations attributable to a variety of factors. These factors include:
lCommodity market fluctuations;
lForeign currency exchange rates;
lImbalances between supply and demand;
lThe effect of weather on crop yield;
lSpeculative influences;
lTrade agreements among producing and consuming nations;
lSupplier compliance with commitments;
lPolitical unrest in producing countries; and
lChanges in governmental agricultural programs and energy policies.
We use futures and options contracts and other commodity derivative instruments in combination with forward purchasing of cocoa products, sugar, corn sweeteners, natural gas and certain dairy products primarily to reduce the risk of future price increases and provide visibility to future costs. Currently, active futures contracts are not available for use in pricing our other major raw material requirements, primarily peanuts and almonds. We attempt to minimize the effect of future price fluctuations related to the purchase of raw materials by using forward purchasing to cover future manufacturing requirements generally for 3 to 24 months. However, the dairy futures markets are not as developed as many of the other commodities futures markets and, therefore, it is difficult to hedge our costs for dairy products by entering into futures contracts or other derivative instruments to extend coverage for long periods of time.

44


We use diesel swap futures contracts to minimize price fluctuations associated with our transportation costs. Our commodity procurement practices are intended to reduce the risk of future price increases and provide visibility to future costs, but also may potentially limit our ability to benefit from possible price decreases. Our costs for major raw materials will not necessarily reflect market price fluctuations primarily because of our forward purchasing and hedging practices.
During 2014,2015, average cocoa futures contract prices increased compared with 20132014 and traded in a range between $1.25$1.28 and $1.45$1.53 per pound, based on the Intercontinental Exchange futures contract. Cocoa production was higher in 20142015 and global demand was slightly higher, which produced a small surplus in cocoa supplies over the past year. Despite the small increase in global cocoa inventories, prices remained elevated in response to concerns over the future balance of global cocoa supply and demand.
The table below shows annual average cocoa futures prices and the highest and lowest monthly averages for each of the calendar years indicated. The prices reflect the monthly averages of the quotations at noon of the three active futures trading contracts closest to maturity on the Intercontinental Exchange.
                    
 
Cocoa Futures Contract Prices
(dollars per pound) 
 
Cocoa Futures Contract Prices
(dollars per pound) 
 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011
Annual Average $1.36
 $1.09
 $1.07
 $1.34
 $1.36
 $1.40
 $1.36
 $1.09
 $1.07
 $1.34
High 1.45
 1.26
 1.17
 1.55
 1.53
 1.53
 1.45
 1.26
 1.17
 1.55
Low 1.25
 0.97
 1.00
 0.99
 1.26
 1.28
 1.25
 0.97
 1.00
 0.99
Source: International Cocoa Organization Quarterly Bulletin of Cocoa Statistics
Our costs for cocoa products will not necessarily reflect market price fluctuations because of our forward purchasing and hedging practices, premiums and discounts reflective of varying delivery times, and supply and demand for our specific varieties and grades of cocoa liquor, cocoa butter and cocoa powder. As a result, the average futures contract prices are not necessarily indicative of our average costs.

39


During 2014,2015, prices for fluid dairy milk ranged from a low of $0.22$0.15 per pound to a high of $0.26$0.18 per pound, on a class II fluid milk basis. Dairy prices reached historically high levels duringwere lower than 2014, driven by increased imports by Chinaproduction and supply challenges due to the 2013 drought in New Zealand.larger inventories globally.
The price of sugar is subject to price supports under U.S. farm legislation. Such legislation establishes import quotas and duties to support the price of sugar. As a result, sugar prices paid by users in the United States are currently higher than prices on the world sugar market. In 2014, U.S.2015, as part of an anti-dumping case against Mexican sugar producers, filed an Anti-dumping suit againstthe U.S. Government determined that Mexico which reducedwas dumping sugar imports from Mexico.into the U.S. market. As a result of the case, the U.S. and Mexican governments signed a suspension agreement which will limit sugar exports from Mexico to the U.S. and cause U.S. sugar prices to trade $0.03 to $0.05 per pound higher than prior to the case. U.S. refined sugar prices increased compared to 2013, trading highertraded in a range from $0.31$0.36 to $0.42$0.40 per pound.pound during 2015.
Peanut prices in the United StatesU.S. began the year around $0.49$0.52 per pound and closed the year at $0.53$0.46 per pound. Peanut supply is ample to support U.S. demand heading into 2015.2016. Almond prices began the year at $3.69$4.34 per pound and increaseddecreased to $4.39$4.04 per pound during 2014.2015. The thirdfourth consecutive year of droughtsdrought in California had a negative impact on yields, with the 20142015 crop estimated to be 10%approximately 5% lower than 2013.2014.
We make or receive cash transfers to or from commodity futures brokers on a daily basis reflecting changes in the value of futures contracts on the Intercontinental Exchange or various other exchanges. These changes in value represent unrealized gains and losses. We report these cash transfers as a component of other comprehensive income. The cash transfers offset higher or lower cash requirements for the payment of future invoice prices of raw materials, energy requirements and transportation costs.
Commodity Position Sensitivity Analysis
The following sensitivity analysis reflects our market risk toOur open commodity derivative contracts had a hypothetical adverse marketnotional value of $374.8 million as of December 31, 2015 and $347.5 million as of December 31, 2014. At the end of 2015, the potential change in fair value of commodity derivative instruments, assuming a 10% decrease in the underlying commodity price, movement of 10%, based onwould have increased our net commodity positions at four dates spaced equally throughoutunrealized losses in 2015 by $37.5 million, generally offset by a reduction in the year. Our net commodity positions consistcost of the amount of futures contracts we hold over or under the amount of futures contracts we need to price unpriced physical forward contracts for the same commodities (our “requirements”). Inventories, fixed-price forward contracts and anticipated purchases not yet under contract are not included in the sensitivity analysis calculations. The fair values of netunderlying commodity positions reflect quoted market prices or estimated future prices, including estimated carrying costs corresponding with the future delivery period. The market risk noted below reflects the potential loss in future earnings resulting from the hypothetical adverse market price movement.
For the years ended December 31,20142013
 
Fair
Value
Market Risk
(Hypothetical
10% Change) 
Fair
Value
Market Risk
(Hypothetical
10% Change) 
In millions of dollars    
Highest position of futures contracts held over (under) requirements$(362.7)$36.3
$(29.3)$2.9
Lowest position of futures contracts held over (under) requirements(612.9)61.3
(249.4)24.9
Average of futures contracts held over (under) requirements(506.6)50.7
(105.6)10.6
The negative positions primarily resulted as our requirements exceeded the amount of commodities futures that we held at certain points in time during the years.

purchases.

4045


Item 8.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 
 PAGE
   
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  
Responsibility for Financial Statements
 
4247
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
4348
Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 2013 and 20122013
 
4550
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 2013 and 20122013
 
4651
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20142015 and 20132014
 
4752
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 2013 and 20122013
 
4853
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 2013 and 20122013
 
4954
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 
5055


4146


RESPONSIBILITY FOR FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The Hershey Company is responsible for the financial statements and other financial information contained in this report. We believe that the financial statements have been prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles appropriate under the circumstances to reflect in all material respects the substance of applicable events and transactions. In preparing the financial statements, it is necessary that management make informed estimates and judgments. The other financial information in this annual report is consistent with the financial statements.
We maintain a system of internal accounting controls designed to provide reasonable assurance that financial records are reliable for purposes of preparing financial statements and that assets are properly accounted for and safeguarded. The concept of reasonable assurance is based on the recognition that the cost of the system must be related to the benefits to be derived. We believe our system provides an appropriate balance in this regard. We maintain an Internal Audit Department which reviews the adequacy and tests the application of internal accounting controls.
The 2015, 2014 2013 and 20122013 financial statements have been audited by KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm. KPMG LLP's report on our financial statements and internal controls over financial reporting is included on page 43.48.
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company, consisting solely of independent, non-management directors, meets regularly with the independent auditors, internal auditors and management to discuss, among other things, the audit scope and results. KPMG LLP and the internal auditors both have full and free access to the Audit Committee, with and without the presence of management.

/s/ JOHN P. BILBREY /s/ RICHARD M. MCCONVILLEPATRICIA A. LITTLE
John P. Bilbrey
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
 
Richard M. McConvillePatricia A. Little
Interim Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial OfficerOfficer)



4247


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


The Board of Directors and Stockholders
The Hershey Company:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of The Hershey Company and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 20142015 and 2013,2014, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, cash flows and stockholders’ equity for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2014.2015. In connection with our audits of the consolidated financial statements, we also have audited the related consolidated financial statement schedule. We also have audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014,2015, based on criteria established in Internal Control –- Integrated Framework (2013) (2013 edition) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”(COSO)”). The Company’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule, and an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. A material weakness existed as of December 31, 2015 related to the Company’s accounting for cocoa derivative financial instruments. This material weakness was considered in determining the nature, timing, and extent of audit tests applied in our audit of the 2015 consolidated financial statements, and this material weakness does not affect our opinion included below on those financial statements.

48


In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of The Hershey Company and subsidiaries as of December 31, 20142015 and 2013,2014, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2014,2015, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our opinion, the related consolidated financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

43


Also in our opinion, because of the effect of the aforementioned material weakness on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria, The Hershey Company and subsidiaries has not maintained in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014,2015, based on criteria established in Internal Control – IntegratedControl-Integrated Framework (2013) (2013 edition) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
Management excluded Shanghai Golden Monkey Food Joint Stock Co., Ltd.,We do not express an entity acquired during 2014, from its assessmentopinion or any other form of assurance on management’s statements referring to actions taken after December 31, 2015, relative to the effectiveness of the Company'saforementioned material weakness in internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014. This entity’s net sales and assets excluded from management's assessment of internal control represented 0.7% and 4.7% of the Company’s total net sales and total assets, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2014. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting of the Company also excluded an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of Shanghai Golden Monkey Food Joint Stock Co., Ltd.reporting.

/s/ KPMG LLP
New York, New York
February 20, 201526, 2016

4449


THE HERSHEY COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
 
For the years ended December 31, 2014 2013 2012 2015 2014 2013
Net sales $7,421,768
 $7,146,079
 $6,644,252
 $7,386,626
 $7,421,768
 $7,146,079
Costs and expenses:            
Cost of sales 4,085,602
 3,865,231
 3,784,370
 4,003,951
 4,085,602
 3,865,231
Selling, marketing and administrative 1,900,970
 1,922,508
 1,703,796
 1,969,308
 1,898,284
 1,924,132
Business realignment and impairment charges 45,621
 18,665
 44,938
Goodwill and other intangible asset impairment charges 280,802
 15,900
 —
Business realignment charges 94,806
 29,721
 18,665
Total costs and expenses 6,032,193
 5,806,404
 5,533,104
 6,348,867
 6,029,507
 5,808,028
Income before interest and income taxes 1,389,575
 1,339,675
 1,111,148
Operating profit 1,037,759
 1,392,261
 1,338,051
Interest expense, net 83,532
 88,356
 95,569
 105,773
 83,532
 88,356
Other (income) expense, net 30,139
 2,686
 (1,624)
Income before income taxes 1,306,043
 1,251,319
 1,015,579
 901,847
 1,306,043
 1,251,319
Provision for income taxes 459,131
 430,849
 354,648
 388,896
 459,131
 430,849
Net income $846,912
 $820,470
 $660,931
 $512,951
 $846,912
 $820,470
            
Net income per share—basic:            
Common stock $3.91
 $3.76
 $3.01
 $2.40
 $3.91
 $3.76
Class B common stock $3.54
 $3.39
 $2.73
 $2.19
 $3.54
 $3.39
            
Net income per share—diluted:            
Common stock $3.77
 $3.61
 $2.89
 $2.32
 $3.77
 $3.61
Class B common stock $3.52
 $3.37
 $2.71
 $2.19
 $3.52
 $3.37
            
Dividends paid per share:            
Common stock $2.040
 $1.81
 $1.560
 $2.236
 $2.040
 $1.81
Class B common stock $1.842
 $1.63
 $1.412
 $2.032
 $1.842
 $1.63
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


4550


THE HERSHEY COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(in thousands)

For the years ended December 31, 2014 2013 2012 2015 2014 2013
Net income $846,912
 $820,470
 $660,931
 $512,951
 $846,912
 $820,470
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax:            
Foreign currency translation adjustments (26,851) (26,003) 7,714
 (59,707) (26,851) (26,003)
Pension and post-retirement benefit plans (85,016) 166,403
 (9,634) 30,002
 (85,016) 166,403
Cash flow hedges:            
(Losses) gains on cash flow hedging derivatives (37,077) 72,334
 (868)
Gains (losses) on cash flow hedging derivatives 38,319
 (37,077) 72,334
Reclassification adjustments (43,062) 5,775
 60,043
 (23,218) (43,062) 5,775
Total other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax (192,006) 218,509
 57,255
 (14,604) (192,006) 218,509
Comprehensive income $654,906
 $1,038,979
 $718,186
Total comprehensive income $498,347
 $654,906
 $1,038,979
Comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling interests 2,152
 —
 —
Comprehensive income attributable to The Hershey Company $500,499
 $654,906
 $1,038,979
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

4651


THE HERSHEY COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share data)
December 31, 2014 2013 2015 2014
ASSETS        
Current assets:        
Cash and cash equivalents $374,854
 $1,118,508
 $346,529
 $374,854
Short-term investments 97,131
 —
 —
 97,131
Accounts receivable—trade, net 596,940
 477,912
 599,073
 596,940
Inventories 801,036
 659,541
 750,970
 801,036
Deferred income taxes 100,515
 52,511
 —
 100,515
Prepaid expenses and other 276,571
 178,862
 152,026
 276,571
Total current assets 2,247,047
 2,487,334
 1,848,598
 2,247,047
Property, plant and equipment, net 2,151,901
 1,805,345
 2,240,460
 2,151,901
Goodwill 792,955
 576,561
 684,252
 792,955
Other intangibles 294,841
 195,244
 379,305
 294,841
Other assets 142,772
 293,004
 155,366
 136,126
Deferred income taxes 36,390
 —
Total assets $5,629,516
 $5,357,488
 $5,344,371
 $5,622,870
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY        
Current liabilities:        
Accounts payable $482,017
 $461,514
 $474,266
 $482,017
Accrued liabilities 813,513
 699,722
 856,967
 813,513
Accrued income taxes 4,616
 79,911
 23,243
 4,616
Short-term debt 384,696
 165,961
 363,513
 384,696
Current portion of long-term debt 250,805
 914
 499,923
 250,805
Total current liabilities 1,935,647
 1,408,022
 2,217,912
 1,935,647
Long-term debt 1,548,963
 1,795,142
 1,557,091
 1,542,317
Other long-term liabilities 526,003
 434,068
 468,718
 526,003
Deferred income taxes 99,373
 104,204
 53,188
 99,373
Total liabilities 4,109,986
 3,741,436
 4,296,909
 4,103,340
    
Stockholders’ equity:        
The Hershey Company stockholders’ equity        
Preferred stock, shares issued: none in 2014 and 2013 —
 —
Common stock, shares issued: 299,281,967 in 2014 and 299,281,527 in 2013 299,281
 299,281
Class B common stock, shares issued: 60,619,777 in 2014 and 60,620,217 in 2013 60,620
 60,620
Preferred stock, shares issued: none in 2015 and 2014 —
 —
Common stock, shares issued: 299,281,967 in 2015 and 299,281,967 in 2014 299,281
 299,281
Class B common stock, shares issued: 60,619,777 in 2015 and 60,619,777 in 2014 60,620
 60,620
Additional paid-in capital 754,186
 664,944
 783,877
 754,186
Retained earnings 5,860,784
 5,454,286
 5,897,603
 5,860,784
Treasury—common stock shares, at cost: 138,856,786 in 2014 and 136,007,023 in 2013 (5,161,236) (4,707,730)
Treasury—common stock shares, at cost: 143,124,384 in 2015 and 138,856,786 in 2014 (5,672,359) (5,161,236)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (358,573) (166,567) (371,025) (358,573)
The Hershey Company stockholders’ equity 1,455,062
 1,604,834
 997,997
 1,455,062
Noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries 64,468
 11,218
 49,465
 64,468
Total stockholders’ equity 1,519,530
 1,616,052
 1,047,462
 1,519,530
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $5,629,516
 $5,357,488
 $5,344,371
 $5,622,870
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

4752


THE HERSHEY COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
For the years ended December 31, 2014 2013 20122015 2014 2013
Operating Activities           
Net income $846,912
 $820,470
 $660,931
$512,951
 $846,912
 $820,470
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided from operations:      
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:     
Depreciation and amortization 211,532
 201,033
 210,037
244,928
 211,532
 201,033
Stock-based compensation expense 54,068
 53,967
 50,482
51,533
 54,068
 53,967
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation (53,497) (48,396) (33,876)(24,839) (53,497) (48,396)
Deferred income taxes 18,796
 7,457
 13,785
(38,537) 18,796
 7,457
Non-cash business realignment and impairment charges 39,988
 —
 38,144
283,469
 39,988
 —
Contributions to pension and other benefits plans (53,110) (57,213) (44,208)(53,273) (53,110) (57,213)
Loss on early extinguishment of debt28,326
 —
 —
Write-down of equity investments39,489
 —
 —
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects from business acquisitions and divestitures:           
Accounts receivable—trade, net (67,464) (16,529) (50,470)(24,440) (67,464) (16,529)
Inventories (88,497) (26,279) 26,598
52,049
 (88,497) (26,279)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities (13,847) 102,411
 69,645
(1,017) (13,847) 102,411
Other assets and liabilities (56,660) 151,484
 153,759
143,817
 (50,504) 154,478
Net cash provided by operating activities 838,221
 1,188,405
 1,094,827
1,214,456
 844,377
 1,191,399
Investing Activities           
Capital additions (345,947) (323,551) (258,727)(329,707) (345,947) (323,551)
Capitalized software additions (24,842) (27,360) (19,239)(27,103) (24,842) (27,360)
Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment 1,612
 15,331
 453
1,205
 1,612
 15,331
Proceeds from sale of business32,408
 —
 —
Loan to affiliate —
 (16,000) (23,000)—
 —
 (16,000)
Equity investments in tax credit qualifying partnerships(30,720) —
 —
Business acquisitions, net of cash and cash equivalents acquired (396,265) —
 (172,856)(218,654) (396,265) —
Purchase of short-term investments (97,131) —
 —
Sale (purchase) of short-term investments95,316
 (97,131) —
Net cash used in investing activities (862,573) (351,580) (473,369)(477,255) (862,573) (351,580)
Financing Activities           
Net increase in short-term debt 117,515
 54,351
 77,698
10,720
 117,515
 54,351
Long-term borrowings 3,051
 250,595
 4,025
599,031
 3,051
 250,595
Repayment of long-term debt (1,442) (250,761) (99,381)(355,446) (1,442) (250,761)
Cash dividends paid (440,414) (393,801) (341,206)(476,132) (440,414) (393,801)
Exercise of stock options 122,306
 147,255
 261,597
72,719
 122,306
 147,255
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation 53,497
 48,396
 33,876
24,839
 53,497
 48,396
Payments to noncontrolling interests —
 —
 (15,791)
Contributions from noncontrolling interests 2,940
 2,940
 2,940
Contributions from noncontrolling interest—
 2,940
 2,940
Payment of contingent consideration(10,000) —
 —
Purchase of noncontrolling interest(38,270) —
 —
Repurchase of common stock (576,755) (305,564) (510,630)(582,623) (576,755) (305,564)
Net cash used in financing activities (719,302) (446,589) (586,872)(755,162) (719,302) (446,589)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents(10,364) (6,156) (2,994)
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents (743,654) 390,236
 34,586
(28,325) (743,654) 390,236
Cash and cash equivalents at January 1 1,118,508
 728,272
 693,686
Cash and cash equivalents at December 31 $374,854
 $1,118,508
 $728,272
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period374,854
 1,118,508
 728,272
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period$346,529
 $374,854
 $1,118,508
Supplemental Disclosure           
Interest paid $87,801
 $92,551
 $100,269
Interest paid (excluding loss on early extinguishment of debt in 2015)$88,448
 $87,801
 $92,551
Income taxes paid 384,318
 373,902
 327,230
368,926
 384,318
 373,902

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


4853


THE HERSHEY COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(in thousands)

 Preferred
Stock		 Common
Stock		 Class B
Common
Stock		 Additional
Paid-in
Capital		 Retained
Earnings		 Treasury
Common
Stock		 Accumulated Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)		 Noncontrolling
Interests in
Subsidiaries		 Total
Stockholders’
Equity		 Preferred
Stock		 Common
Stock		 Class B
Common
Stock		 Additional
Paid-in
Capital		 Retained
Earnings		 Treasury
Common
Stock		 Accumulated Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)		 Noncontrolling
Interests in
Subsidiaries		 Total
Stockholders’
Equity
Balance, January 1, 2012 $—
 $299,269
 $60,632
 $490,817
 $4,707,892
 $(4,258,962) $(442,331) $23,626
 $880,943
Net income         660,931
       660,931
Other comprehensive income             57,255
   57,255
Dividends:                  
Common stock, $1.56 per share         (255,596)       (255,596)
Class B common stock, $1.412 per share         (85,610)       (85,610)
Conversion of Class B common stock into common stock   3
 (3)           —
Stock-based compensation       49,175
         49,175
Exercise of stock options and incentive-based transactions       64,028
   210,924
     274,952
Repurchase of common stock           (510,630)     (510,630)
Acquisition of Tri-US, Inc.       (11,045)       (4,746) (15,791)
Earnings of and contributions from noncontrolling interests, net               (7,256) (7,256)
Balance, December 31, 2012 —
 299,272
 60,629
 592,975
 5,027,617
 (4,558,668) (385,076) 11,624
 1,048,373
Balance, January 1, 2013 $—
 $299,272
 $60,629
 $592,975
 $5,027,617
 $(4,558,668) $(385,076) $11,624
 $1,048,373
Net income         820,470
       820,470
         820,470
       820,470
Other comprehensive income             218,509
   218,509
             218,509
   218,509
Dividends:                                    
Common stock, $1.81 per share         (294,979)       (294,979)         (294,979)       (294,979)
Class B common stock, $1.63 per share         (98,822)       (98,822)         (98,822)       (98,822)
Conversion of Class B common stock into common stock   9
 (9)           —
   9
 (9)           —
Stock-based compensation       52,465
         52,465
       52,465
         52,465
Exercise of stock options and incentive-based transactions       19,504
   156,502
     176,006
       19,504
   156,502
     176,006
Repurchase of common stock           (305,564)     (305,564)           (305,564)     (305,564)
Earnings of and contributions from noncontrolling interests, net               (406) (406)               (406) (406)
Balance, December 31, 2013 —
 $299,281
 $60,620
 $664,944
 $5,454,286
 $(4,707,730) $(166,567) $11,218
 $1,616,052
 —
 299,281
 60,620
 664,944
 5,454,286
 (4,707,730) (166,567) 11,218
 1,616,052
Net income         846,912
       846,912
         846,912
       846,912
Other comprehensive loss             (192,006)   (192,006)
Other comprehensive income             (192,006)   (192,006)
Dividends:                                    
Common stock, $2.04 per share         (328,752)       (328,752)         (328,752)       (328,752)
Class B common stock, $1.842 per share         (111,662)       (111,662)         (111,662)       (111,662)
Stock-based compensation       52,870
         52,870
       52,870
         52,870
Exercise of stock options and incentive-based transactions       36,372
   123,249
     159,621
       36,372
   123,249
     159,621
Repurchase of common stock           (576,755)     (576,755)           (576,755)     (576,755)
Acquisition of Lotte Shanghai Food Company               49,724
 49,724
               49,724
 49,724
Earnings of and contributions from noncontrolling interests, net               3,526
 3,526
               3,526
 3,526
Balance, December 31, 2014 $—
 $299,281
 $60,620
 $754,186
 $5,860,784
 $(5,161,236) $(358,573) $64,468
 $1,519,530
 —
 299,281
 60,620
 754,186
 5,860,784
 (5,161,236) (358,573) 64,468
 1,519,530
Net income         512,951
       512,951
Other comprehensive loss             (12,452) (2,152) (14,604)
Dividends:                  
Common stock, $2.236 per share         (352,953)       (352,953)
Class B common stock, $2.032 per share         (123,179)       (123,179)
Stock-based compensation       50,722
         50,722
Exercise of stock options and incentive-based transactions       8,204
   71,500
     79,704
Repurchase of common stock           (582,623)     (582,623)
Impact of reclassification to and purchase of redeemable noncontrolling interest       (29,235)       (13,428) (42,663)
Earnings of noncontrolling interests               577
 577
Balance, December 31, 2015 $—
 $299,281
 $60,620
 $783,877
 $5,897,603
 $(5,672,359) $(371,025) $49,465
 $1,047,462
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

4954
THE HERSHEY COMPANY
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(amounts in thousands, except share data or if otherwise indicated)




1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Description of Business
The Hershey Company together with its wholly-owned subsidiaries and entities in which it has a controlling interest,(the “Company,” “Hershey,” “we” or “us”) is a global confectionery leader known for its branded portfolio of chocolate, sweets, mints and other great-tasting snacks. The Company has more than 80 brands worldwide including such iconic brand names as Hershey’s, Reese’s, Hershey’s Kisses, Jolly Rancher and Ice Breakers, which are marketed, sold and distributed in approximately 70 countries worldwide. Hershey is focused on growing its presence in key international markets while continuing to build its competitive advantage in North America. The Company currently operates through two reportable segments that are aligned with its management structure and the key markets it serves: North America and International and Other. For additional information on our segment presentation, see Note 11.
Basis of Presentation
Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of The Hershey Company and its majority-owned or controlled subsidiaries. Intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated. We have a controlling financial interest if we own a majority of the outstanding voting common stock and minority shareholders do not have substantive participating rights, we have significant control through contractual or economic interests in which we are the primary beneficiary or we have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity's economic performance. Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests is not significant and is recorded within selling, marketing and administrative expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income. See Note 12 for additional information on our noncontrolling interests. We use the equity method of accounting when we have a 20% to 50% interest in other companies and exercise significant influence. Net income (loss) from suchAdditionally, in 2015 we began making investments is not significant and is also recorded in selling, marketing and administrative expense. As of December 31, 2013,partnership entities which make equity investments included within other long-term assets in projects eligible to receive federal historic and energy tax credits which are accounted for using the Consolidated Balance Sheets totaled $39,872.equity method. See Note 7 for additional information on our equity investments in partnership entities qualifying for tax credits. We held no equity investments at December 31, 2014. See Note 12 for additional information on our noncontrolling interests.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying disclosures. Our significant estimates and assumptions include, among others, pension and other post-retirement benefit plan assumptions, valuation assumptions of goodwill and other intangible assets, useful lives of long-lived assets, marketing and trade promotion accruals and income taxes. These estimates and assumptions are based on management’s best judgment. Management evaluates its estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis using historical experience and other factors, including the current economic environment, and the effects of any revisions are reflected in the consolidated financial statements in the period that they are determined. As future events and their effects cannot be determined with precision, actual results could differ significantly from these estimates.
Revenue Recognition
We record sales when all of the following criteria have been met:
lA valid customer order with a fixed price has been received;
lThe product has been delivered to the customer;
lThere is no further significant obligation to assist in the resale of the product; and
lCollectability is reasonably assured.
Net sales include revenue from the sale of finished goods and royalty income, net of allowances for trade promotions, consumer coupon programs and other sales incentives, and allowances and discounts associated with aged or potentially unsaleable products. Trade promotions and sales incentives primarily include reduced price features,

55
THE HERSHEY COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except share data or if otherwise indicated)

merchandising displays, sales growth incentives, new item allowances and cooperative advertising. Sales, use, value-added and other excise taxes are not recognized in revenue.

50
THE HERSHEY COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(amountsIn 2015, 2014 and 2013, approximately 26%, 25% and 26%, respectively, of our consolidated net sales were made to McLane Company, Inc., one of the largest wholesale distributors in thousands, except share data or if otherwise indicated)the United States to convenience stores, drug stores, wholesale clubs and mass merchandisers and the primary distributor of our products to Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Cost of Sales
Cost of sales represents costs directly related to the manufacture and distribution of our products. Primary costs include raw materials, packaging, direct labor, overhead, shipping and handling, warehousing and the depreciation of manufacturing, warehousing and distribution facilities. Manufacturing overhead and related expenses include salaries, wages, employee benefits, utilities, maintenance and property taxes.
Selling, Marketing and Administrative Expense
Selling, marketing and administrative expense (“SM&A”) represents costs incurred in generating revenues and in managing our business. Such costs include advertising and other marketing expenses, selling expenses, research and development, administrative and other indirect overhead costs, amortization of capitalized software and depreciation of administrative facilities.  Research and development costs, charged to expense as incurred, totaled $49,281 in 2015, $47,554 in 2014 and $47,636 in 2013 and $38,959 in 2012.2013. Advertising expense is also charged to expense as incurred and totaled $561,644 in 2015, $570,223 in 2014 and $582,354 in 2013 and $480,016 in 2012.2013. Prepaid advertising expense was $8,193$3,924 and $8,432$8,193 as of December 31, 20142015 and 2013,2014, respectively.
Cash Equivalents
Cash equivalents consist of highly liquid debt instruments, time deposits and money market funds with original maturities of three months or less. The fair value of cash and cash equivalents approximates the carrying amount.
Short-term Investments
Short-term investments consist of bank term deposits that have original maturity dates ranging from greater than three months to twelve months. Short-term investments are carried at cost, which approximates fair value.
Accounts Receivable—Trade
In the normal course of business, we extend credit to customers that satisfy pre-defined credit criteria, based upon the results of our recurring financial account reviews and our evaluation of current and projected economic conditions. Our primary concentrations of credit risk are associated with Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and McLane Company, Inc., two customers served principally by our North America segment. McLane Company, Inc. is one of the largest wholesale distributors in the United States to convenience stores, drug stores, wholesale clubs and mass merchandisers. As of December 31, 2014,2015, McLane Company, Inc. accounted for approximately 12.8%19% of our total accounts receivable. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. accounted for approximately 12.3%14% of our total accounts receivable as of December 31, 2014.2015. No other customer accounted for more than 10% of our year-end accounts receivable. We believe that we have little concentration of credit risk associated with the remainder of our customer base. Accounts receivable-trade in the Consolidated Balance Sheets is presented net of allowances and anticipated discounts of $15,885$32,638 and $14,329$15,885 at December 31, 20142015 and 2013,2014, respectively.
Inventories
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market value, adjusted for the value of inventory that is estimated to be excess, obsolete or otherwise unsaleable. As of December 31, 2014,2015, approximately 54%55% of our inventories, representing the majority of our U.S. inventories, were valued under the last-in, first-out (“LIFO”) method. The remainder of our inventories in the U.S. and inventories for our international businesses are valued at the lower of first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) cost or market. LIFO cost of inventories valued using the LIFO method was $410,865 as of December 31, 2015 and $430,094 as of December 31, 2014 and $314,9992014. The adjustment to LIFO, as shown in Note 15, approximates the excess of December 31, 2013.replacement cost over the stated LIFO inventory value. The net impact of LIFO acquisitions and liquidations was not material to 2015, 2014 2013 or 2012.2013.

56
THE HERSHEY COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except share data or if otherwise indicated)

Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost and depreciated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets, as follows: 3 to 15 years for machinery and equipment; and 25 to 40 years for buildings and related improvements. Maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. We capitalize applicable interest charges incurred during the construction of new facilities and production lines and amortize these costs over the assets’ estimated useful lives.

51
THE HERSHEY COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except share data or if otherwise indicated)

We review long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. We measure the recoverability of assets to be held and used by a comparison of the carrying amount of long-lived assets to future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated. If these assets are considered to be impaired, we measure impairment as the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. We report assets held for sale or disposal at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell.
We assess asset retirement obligations on a periodic basis and recognize the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation in the period in which it is incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. We capitalize associated asset retirement costs as part of the carrying amount of the long-lived asset.
Computer Software
We capitalize costs associated with software developed or obtained for internal use when both the preliminary project stage is completed and it is probable the software being developed will be completed and placed in service. Capitalized costs include only (i) external direct costs of materials and services consumed in developing or obtaining internal-use software, (ii) payroll and other related costs for employees who are directly associated with and who devote time to the internal-use software project and (iii) interest costs incurred, when material, while developing internal-use software. We cease capitalization of such costs no later than the point at which the project is substantially complete and ready for its intended purpose.
The unamortized amount of capitalized software totaled $63,252$68,004 and $56,502$63,252 at December 31, 20142015 and 2013,2014, respectively. We amortize software costs using the straight-line method over the expected life of the software, generally 3 to 5 years. Accumulated amortization of capitalized software was $300,698$304,057 and $277,872$300,698 as of December 31, 20142015 and 2013,2014, respectively. Such amounts are recorded within other assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
We review the carrying value of software and development costs for impairment in accordance with our policy pertaining to the impairment of long-lived assets. Generally, we measure impairment under the following circumstances:
lWhen internal-use computer software is not expected to provide substantive service potential;
lWhen a significant change occurs in the extent or manner in which the software is used or is expected to be used;
lWhen a significant change is made or will be made to the software program; and
lWhen the costs of developing or modifying internal-use computer software significantly exceed the amount originally expected to develop or modify the software.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are not amortized, but are evaluated for impairment annually or more often if indicators of a potential impairment are present. Our annual impairment tests are conducted at the beginning of the fourth quarter. We use a two-step process to quantitatively evaluate goodwill for impairment. In the first step, we compare the fair value of each reporting unit with the carrying amount of the reporting unit, including goodwill. If the estimated fair value of the reporting unit is less than the carrying amount of the reporting unit, we complete a second step to determine the amount of the goodwill impairment that we should record. In the second step, we determine an implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill by allocating the reporting unit’s fair value to all of its assets and liabilities other than goodwill (including any unrecognized intangible assets). We compare the resulting

57
THE HERSHEY COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except share data or if otherwise indicated)

implied fair value of the goodwill to the carrying amount and record an impairment charge for the difference. We test individual indefinite-lived intangible assets by comparing the estimated fair value with the book values of each asset.
We determine the fair value of our reporting units and indefinite-lived intangible assets using an income approach. Under the income approach, we calculate the fair value of our reporting units and indefinite-lived intangible assets based on the present value of estimated future cash flows. Considerable management judgment is necessary to evaluate the impact of operating and macroeconomic changes and to estimate the future cash flows used to measure fair value. Our estimates of future cash flows consider past performance, current and anticipated market conditions

52
THE HERSHEY COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except share data or if otherwise indicated)

and internal projections and operating plans which incorporate estimates for sales growth and profitability, and cash flows associated with taxes and capital spending. Additional assumptions include forecasted growth rates, estimated discount rates, which may be risk-adjusted for the operating market of the reporting unit, and estimated royalty rates that would be charged for comparable branded licenses. We believe such assumptions also reflect current and anticipated market conditions and are consistent with those that would be used by other marketplace participants for similar valuation purposes. Such assumptions are subject to change due to changing economic and competitive conditions. See Note 3 for additional information regarding the results of our annual impairment test.tests.
The cost of intangible assets with finite useful lives is amortized on a straight-line basis. Our finite-lived intangible assets consist primarily of certain trademarks, customer-related intangible assets and patents obtained through business acquisitions, which are amortized over estimated useful lives of approximately 25 years, 15 years, and 5 years, respectively. When certain events or changes in operating conditions indicate that the carrying value of these assets may not be recoverable, we perform an impairment assessment and may adjust the remaining useful lives.
Currency Translation
The financial statements of our foreign entities with functional currencies other than the U.S. dollar are translated into U.S. dollars, with the resulting translation adjustments recorded as a component of other comprehensive income (loss). Assets and liabilities are translated into U.S. dollars using the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date, while income and expense items are translated using the average exchange rates during the period.
Derivative Instruments
We use derivative instruments principally to offset exposure to market risks arising from changes in commodity prices, foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates. See Note 5 for additional information on our risk management strategy and the types of instruments we use.
Derivative instruments are recognized on the balance sheet at their fair values. When we become party to a derivative instrument and intend to apply hedge accounting, we designate the instrument for financial reporting purposes as a cash flow or fair value hedge. The accounting for changes in fair value (gains or losses) of a derivative instrument depends on whether we had designated it and it qualified as part of a hedging relationship, as noted below:
Changes in the fair value of a derivative that is designated as a cash flow hedge are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”) to the extent effective and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the transaction hedged by that derivative also affects earnings.
Changes in the fair value of a derivative that is designated as a fair value hedge, along with the offsetting loss or gain on the hedged asset or liability that is attributable to the risk being hedged, are recorded in earnings, thereby reflecting in earnings the net extent to which the hedge is not effective in achieving offsetting changes in fair value.
Changes in the fair value of a derivative not designated as a hedging instrument are recognized in earnings in cost of sales or SM&A, consistent with the related exposure.
For derivatives designated as hedges, we assess, both at the hedge's inception and on an ongoing basis, whether they are highly effective in offsetting changes in fair values or cash flows of hedged items. The ineffective portion, if any, is recorded directly in earnings. In addition, if we determine that a derivative is not highly effective as a hedge or that it has ceased to be a highly effective hedge, we discontinue hedge accounting prospectively.
We do not hold or issue derivative instruments for trading or speculative purposes and are not a party to any instruments with leverage or prepayment features.

58
THE HERSHEY COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except share data or if otherwise indicated)

Cash flows related to the derivative instruments we use to manage interest, commodity or other currency exposures are classified as operating activities.

Other (Income) Expense, net
In the second quarter of 2015, we began presenting a new non-operating "other (income) expense, net" classification to report certain gains and losses associated with activities not directly related to our core operations. For the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, we reclassified from selling, marketing and administrative expenses to other (income) expense, net total net expense of $2,686 and income of $1,624, respectively, to conform to the current year presentation. After considering these reclassifications, amounts reflected in other (income) expense, net include the following:
53
THE HERSHEY COMPANY
 Year Ended
 December 31,
2015		 December 31,
2014		 December 31,
2013
Gain on sale of non-core trademark$(9,950) $—
 $—
Write-down of equity investments in partnerships qualifying for historic tax credits (see Note 7)39,489
 —
 —
Foreign currency exchange loss relating to strategy to cap Shanghai Golden Monkey acquisition price as denominated in U.S. dollars—
 6,722
 —
Gain on acquisition of controlling interest in Lotte Shanghai Food Company—
 (4,628) —
Other losses (gains), net600
 592
 (1,624)
Total$30,139
 $2,686
 $(1,624)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)Reclassifications
(Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation. Specifically, this includes amounts presented in thousands, except share data or if otherwise indicated)our “other (income) expense, net” caption included in our Consolidated Statements of Income and the “effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents” included in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. ASU No. 2014-09 will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. GAAP when it becomes effective. The new standard iswas originally effective for us on January 1, 2017.2017; however, in July 2015 the FASB decided to defer the effective date by one year. Early application is not permitted.permitted, but reporting entities may choose to adopt the standard as of the original effective date. The standard permits the use of either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition method. We are currently evaluating the effect that ASU No. 2014-09 will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures, our transition date and transition method.
In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03, Interest - Imputation of Interest: Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs.  ASU No. 2015-03 requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts.  This ASU is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, with early adoption permitted. Management elected to early adopt this new guidance effective for the year ended December 31, 2015, and has applied changes retrospectively to all periods presented. Adoption of this ASU did not materially impact our consolidated financial statements or related disclosures.
In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-17, Income Taxes (Topic 740). This ASU simplifies the presentation of deferred income taxes by requiring that deferred tax assets and liabilities be classified as non-current in a classified statement of financial position. This ASU is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016 and interim periods within those annual periods, with early adoption permitted. Management elected to early adopt this

59
THE HERSHEY COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except share data or if otherwise indicated)

new guidance effect for the year ended December 31, 2015 on a prospective basis. Prior period balances have not been adjusted.
No other new accounting pronouncement issued or effective during the fiscal year had or is expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements or disclosures.
2. BUSINESS ACQUISITIONS AND DIVESTITURES
Acquisitions
Acquisitions of businesses are accounted for as purchases and, accordingly, the results of operations of the businesses acquired have been included in the consolidated financial statements since the respective dates of the acquisitions. The purchase price for each of the acquisitions is allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed.
2015 Acquisition
KRAVE Pure Foods
In March 2015, we completed the acquisition of all of the outstanding shares of KRAVE Pure Foods, Inc. (“Krave”), manufacturer of KRAVE jerky, a leading all-natural snack brand of premium jerky products. The transaction was undertaken to allow Hershey to tap into the rapidly growing meat snacks category and further expand into the broader snacks space. Krave is headquartered in Sonoma, California and generated 2014 annual sales of approximately $35 million.
Total purchase consideration included cash consideration of $220,016, as well as agreement to pay additional cash consideration of up to $20,000 to the Krave shareholders if certain defined targets related to net sales and gross profit margin are met or exceeded during the twelve-month periods ending December 31, 2015 or March 31, 2016. The fair value of the contingent cash consideration was appropriately classified as a liability of $16,800 as of the acquisition date. Based on revised targets in a subsequent agreement with the Krave shareholders, the fair value was reduced over the second and third quarters of 2015 to $10,000, with the adjustment to fair value recorded within selling, marketing and administrative expenses. The remaining $10,000 was paid in December 2015.
The purchase consideration was allocated to assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their respective fair values as follows:
Goodwill$147,089
Trademarks112,000
Other intangible assets17,000
Other assets, primarily current assets, net of cash acquired totaling $1,3629,465
Current liabilities(2,756)
Non-current deferred tax liabilities(47,344)
Net assets acquired$235,454
Goodwill is calculated as the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net assets acquired. The goodwill resulting from the acquisition is attributable primarily to the value of leveraging our brand building expertise, consumer insights, supply chain capabilities and retail relationships to accelerate growth and access to KRAVE products. The recorded goodwill is not expected to be deductible for tax purposes. The purchase price allocation for Krave was concluded in the third quarter of 2015.
Acquired trademarks were assigned estimated useful lives of 22 years, while other intangibles, including customer relationships and covenants not to compete, were assigned estimated useful lives ranging from 5 to 16 years.

60
THE HERSHEY COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except share data or if otherwise indicated)

2014 Acquisitions
Shanghai Golden Monkey
On September 26, 2014 (the “Initial Acquisition”), our wholly-owned subsidiary, Hershey Netherlands B.V., completed the acquisition of 80% of the total outstanding shares of Shanghai Golden Monkey Food Joint Stock Co., Ltd. (“SGM”), a privately held confectionery company based in Shanghai, China operating through six production facilities located in China. The Golden Monkey product line is primarily sold in China's traditional trade channels. The business complements our position in China, and we expectwas undertaken to enable us to take advantage of SGM's distribution and manufacturing capabilities to expand sales of our Hershey products in the China marketplace. Our consolidated net sales for the year ended December 31, 2014 included approximately $54 million generated by SGM since the date of acquisition.
The Initial Acquisition was funded by cash consideration of $394,470, subject to working capital and net debt adjustments. As ofAt December 31, 2014, we havehad recorded a receivable of $37,860, reflecting our current best estimate of the amount due from the selling SGM shareholders for the working capital and net debt adjustments. Such amount is reflected within prepaid expenses and other in the Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2014.Sheet.
As part of the transaction, Hershey Netherlands B.V. has contractually agreed to purchase the remaining 20% of the outstanding shares of SGM on the one-year anniversary of the Initial Acquisition, subject to the parties obtaining government and regulatory approvals and satisfaction of other closing conditions. As such,At December 31, 2014, we havehad recorded a liability of $100,067, reflecting the acquisition date fair value of the future payment to be made to the SGM shareholders. This liability is included within accrued liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2014.Sheet.
The total purchase consideration, net of cash and cash equivalents acquired totaling $14,727, was allocated to the net assets acquired based on their respective fair values at September 26, 2014, as follows:

54
THE HERSHEY COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except share data or if otherwise indicated)

In millions of dollarsPurchase Price Allocation
Accounts receivable - trade$46
Inventories42
Other current assets37
Property, plant and equipment112
Goodwill235
Distribution channel relationships85
Trademarks60
Other non-current assets35
Current liabilities assumed(54)
Short-term debt assumed(105)
Other non-current liabilities assumed, principally deferred taxes(52)
Net assets acquired$441
We are continuing to refine the valuations of acquired assets and liabilities and expect to finalize the purchase price allocation in 2015. Most notably, we are conducting additional procedures to assess the valuation of working capital-related balances at the acquisition date.
Goodwill is calculated as the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net assets acquired. The goodwill resultingthat resulted from the SGM acquisition iswas attributable primarily to the value of providing an established platform to leverage our brands in the China market, as well as expected synergies and other benefits from the combined brand portfolios. The recorded goodwill is not expected to be deductible for tax purposes.
Acquired distribution channel relationships and trademarks were assigned estimated useful lives of 16 years and 22 years, respectively.
During the first quarter of 2015, we came to an agreement with the selling SGM shareholders to revise the aforementioned receivable and liability balances to reflect partial settlement of the receivable. As a result, in the first quarter, the receivable was adjusted to $8,685 and the liability was adjusted to $76,815. Additionally, during the first quarter of 2015, goodwill was increased by $6,623 to recognize revisions to the estimated value of assets and liabilities acquired in the acquisition. During the second quarter, based on our ongoing procedures to assess the quality of acquired trade accounts receivable, we recorded an additional adjustment to increase goodwill by $25,898 to reflect bad debt allowance for an additional amount of trade receivables considered to be uncollectible as of the acquisition date.
During the third quarter of 2015, we continued our procedures to assess the quality of acquired trade accounts receivable. We also undertook procedures to further evaluate and quantify outstanding pre-acquisition trade promotion commitments to distributors, as well as allowances for returns and discounts related to excess and unsalable inventory held at distributors and sales branches as of the acquisition date. In addition, we concluded on our procedures to estimate the value of pre-acquisition indirect tax contingencies. As a result of these procedures, during the third quarter, we increased the value of acquired goodwill by $16,599, with the corresponding offset principally represented by the establishment of additional opening balance sheet liabilities for the aforementioned commitments and contingencies.

61
THE HERSHEY COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except share data or if otherwise indicated)

Based on all of the information obtained through the procedures noted previously, we updated our estimates of the acquisition-date fair values of the net assets acquired as of September 26, 2015, the conclusion of the one-year measurement period. Subsequent revisions to the valuation of acquired net assets have been reflected in current results. A roll-forward of the estimated acquisition-date fair values at December 31, 2014 to the final acquisition-date fair values as of September 26, 2015, the conclusion of the one-year measurement period, is as follows:
  Acquisition date purchase price allocation*
In millions of dollars At 12/31/14 Adjustments  At 9/26/15
Accounts receivable - trade$46
 $(26) $20
Inventories42
 (1) 41
Other current assets37
 6
 43
Property, plant and equipment112
 2
 114
Goodwill235
 49
 284
Other intangible assets145
 —
 145
Other non-current assets35
 (3) 32
Current liabilities assumed(54) (20) (74)
Short-term debt assumed(105) —
 (105)
Other non-current liabilities assumed, principally deferred taxes(52) (2) (54)
     Net assets acquired$441
   $446

*Note that the final opening balance sheet value of goodwill presented in the schedule above differs from total write-off of $280.8 million due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates since the date of acquisition.
In the fourth quarter of 2015, we entered into a new agreement with the selling SGM shareholders to reduce the originally-agreed purchase price for the remaining 20% of SGM to approximately $36 million. We completed the purchase on February 3, 2016. We are directing our efforts currently on developing an integration plan that is focused on the optimal structure for top-line growth.
Goodwill impairment - SGM reporting unit
As discussed in the second quarter of 2015, since its initial acquisition in 2014, the SGM business has performed below expectations, with net sales and earnings levels well below pre-acquisition levels. In addition, as part of our ongoing integration process, we continued to assess the quality of SGM’s accounts receivable and existing distributor networks. Based on the declining performance levels and the results of our assessment to date, we determined that an interim impairment test of the SGM reporting unit was required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. We performed the first step of this test as of July 5, 2015 using an income approach based on our estimates of future performance scenarios for the business. The results of this test indicated that the fair value of the reporting unit was less than the carrying amount as of the measurement date, suggesting that a goodwill impairment was probable, which required us to perform a second step analysis to confirm that an impairment exists and to determine the amount of the impairment based on our reassessed value of the reporting unit. Although preliminary, as a result of this reassessment, in the second quarter of 2015 we recorded an estimated $249,811 non-cash goodwill impairment charge, representing a write-down of all of the goodwill related to the SGM reporting unit as of July 5, 2015.
As noted above, during the third quarter, we increased the value of acquired goodwill by $16,599, with the corresponding offset principally represented by the establishment of additional opening balance sheet liabilities for the aforementioned commitments and contingencies. We also finalized the impairment test of the goodwill relating to the SGM reporting unit, which resulted in a write-off of this additional goodwill in the third quarter, for a total impairment of $266,409. We also tested the other long-lived assets of SGM for recoverability by comparing the sum of the undiscounted cash flows to the carrying value of the asset group, and no impairment was indicated.

62
THE HERSHEY COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except share data or if otherwise indicated)

Goodwill impairment - China chocolate reporting unit
In connection with the SGM acquisition, we assigned approximately $15 million of goodwill to our existing China chocolate business, as this reporting unit was expected to benefit from acquisition synergies relating to the sale of Golden Monkey-branded product through its Tier 1 and hypermarket distributor networks. As the net sales and earnings of our China business continued to be adversely impacted by macroeconomic challenges and changing consumer shopping behavior through the third quarter, we determined that an interim impairment test of the goodwill in this reporting unit was also required. We performed the first step of this test in the third quarter of 2015 using an income approach based on our estimates of future performance scenarios for the business. The results of this test suggested that a goodwill impairment was probable, and the conclusions of the second step analysis resulted in a write-down of $14,393, representing the full value of goodwill attributed to this reporting unit as of October 4, 2015.
The Allan Candy Company Limited
In December 2014, our wholly-owned subsidiary, Hershey Canada Inc., completed the acquisition of all of the outstanding shares of The Allan Candy Company Limited (“Allan”) for cash consideration of approximately $27,376, subject to a working capital adjustment. Allan is headquartered in Ontario, Canada and manufactures certain non-chocolate products on behalf of Hershey, in addition to manufacturing and distributing its own branded products, principally in Canada. The preliminary purchase price allocation includes fixed assets of $10,897, goodwill of $6,996, other intangible assets of $8,092, and other net assets of $1,391. Other intangibles include customer relationships and trademarks with estimated useful lives ranging from 3 to 19 years.
During the first half of 2015, we increased goodwill by $1,820 to recognize revisions to the preliminary fair value of net assets acquired. The purchase price allocation for Allan was concluded in the second quarter of 2015.
Lotte Shanghai Food Company
In March 2014, we acquired an additional 5.9% interest in Lotte Shanghai Food Company (“LSFC”), a joint venture established in 2007 in China for the purpose of manufacturing and selling product to the venture partners. For this additional interest, we paid $5,580 in cash, increasing our ownership from 44.1% to 50%. At the same time, we also amended the LSFC shareholders' agreement resulting in our operational control over the venture. With the additional operational control, we reassessed our involvement with LSFC and concluded that we have a controlling financial interest. Therefore, we consolidated the venture as of the March 2014 acquisition date. We had previously accounted for our investment in LSFC using the equity method.
Total consideration transferred was approximately $99,161, including the $5,580 cash consideration paid, the estimated fair value of our previously held equity interest of $43,857 and the estimated fair value of the remaining noncontrolling interest in LSFC of $49,724, which fair values were determined using a market-based approach. The fair value of the LSFC assets acquired and liabilities assumed on the acquisition date was $99,449, including fixed assets of $106,253, short-term debt obligations of $13,292 and other net assets of $6,488.
We recognized a gain of approximately $4,627 in connection with this transaction, primarily related to the remeasurement of the fair value of our equity interest immediately before the business combination. The gain is included in selling, marketing and administrativeother (income) expense, net within our Consolidated Statement of Income for the year ended December 31, 2014. Additionally, cash acquired in the transaction exceeded the $5,580 paid for the controlling interest by $10,035, resulting in a positive cash impact from the acquisition as presented in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the year ended December 31, 2014.
The Allan Candy Company LimitedPro Forma Presentation
Pro forma results of operations have not been presented for these aforementioned acquisitions, as the impact to our consolidated financial statements was not expected to be material. In December 2014 our wholly-owned subsidiary, Hershey Canada Inc., completedand 2013, we incurred net acquisition-related costs primarily related to the SGM acquisition of all$13,270 and $4,072, respectively. These costs primarily consist of third-party advisory fees and are recorded within selling, marketing and administrative costs in the Consolidated Statements of Income, with the exception of the outstanding shares of The Allan Candy Company Limited (“Allan”) for cash consideration of approximately $27,376,2014 costs reflecting net foreign currency exchange losses relating to our strategy to cap the SGM acquisition price as denominated in U.S. dollars, which are recorded within other (income) expense, net. Acquisition costs incurred in 2015 were not significant.

5563
THE HERSHEY COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except share data or if otherwise indicated)

subject to a working capital adjustment. Allan is headquartered in Ontario, Canada and manufactures certain non-chocolate products on behalf of Hershey, in addition to manufacturing and distributing its own branded products, principally in Canada. The preliminary purchase price allocation includes fixed assets of $10,897, goodwill of $6,996, other intangible assets of $8,092, and other net assets of $1,391. Other intangibles include customer relationships and trademarks with estimated useful lives ranging from 3 to 19 years. We expect to finalize the purchase price allocation for Allan by mid-2015.
Brookside Foods Ltd.
In January 2012, we acquired all of the outstanding stock of Brookside Foods Ltd. (“Brookside”), a privately held confectionery company based in Abbottsford, British Columbia, Canada. As part of this transaction, we acquired two production facilities located in British Columbia and Quebec. The Brookside product line is primarily sold in the U.S. and Canada in a take-home re-sealable pack type.
Our financial statements reflect the final accounting for the Brookside acquisition. The purchase price for the acquisition was approximately $173,000. The purchase price allocation of the Brookside acquisition is as follows:
In millions of dollars
Purchase Price
Allocation
Goodwill$68
Trademarks60
Other intangibles51
Other assets, net of liabilities assumed of $18.7 million22
Non-current deferred tax liabilities(28)
Purchase price$173
The excess purchase price over the estimated value of the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets was recorded to goodwill. The goodwill is not expected to be deductible for tax purposes.
Acquired trademarks were assigned estimated useful lives of 25 years, while other intangibles, including customer relationships, patents and covenants not to compete, were assigned estimated useful lives ranging from 6 to 17 years.
Pro Forma Presentation
Pro forma results of operations have not been presented for these acquisitions, as the impact on our consolidated financial statements is not material. In 2014 and 2013, we incurred net acquisition-related costs primarily related to the SGM acquisition of $13,270 and $4,072, respectively. In 2012, we incurred acquisition costs of $13,374, primarily related to the Brookside acquisition. These costs are recorded within selling, marketing and administrative costs in the Consolidated Statements of Income and primarily include third-party advisory fees; however, the 2014 costs also include net foreign currency exchange losses relating to our strategy to cap the SGM acquisition price as denominated in U.S. dollars.
Planned2015 Divestiture
In December 2014, we entered into an agreement to sell the Mauna Loa Macadamia Nut Corporation (“Mauna Loa”) for $38,000, subject to a working capital adjustment and customary closing conditions.. The sale is expected to be finalizedtransaction closed in the first quarter of 2015.2015, resulting in proceeds, net of selling expenses and an estimated working capital adjustment, of approximately $32,400. As a result of the expected sale, in 2014, we have recorded an estimated loss on the anticipated sale of $22,256 to reflect the disposal entity at fair value, less an estimate of the selling costs. This amount includesincluded impairment charges totaling $18,531 to write down goodwill and the indefinite-lived trademark intangible asset, based on the valuation of these assets as implied by the agreed-upon sales price. The estimatedsale of Mauna Loa resulted in the recording of an additional loss on sale of $2,667 in the anticipatedfirst quarter of 2015, based on updates to the selling expenses and tax benefits. The loss on the sale is reflected within business realignment and impairment costs in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
Mauna Loa ishad historically been reported within our North America segment. Its operations arewere not material to our annual net sales, net income or earnings per share.

56
THE HERSHEY COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except share data or if otherwise indicated)

Amounts classified as assets and liabilities held for sale at December 31, 2014 have beenwere presented within prepaid expenses and other assets and accrued liabilities, respectively, and includeincluded the following:         
Assets held for sale 
Inventories$21,489
Prepaid expenses and other173
Property, plant and equipment, net12,691
Other intangibles12,705
 $47,058
Liabilities held for sale 
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities$3,726
Other long-term liabilities9,029
 $12,755
3. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
The changes in the carrying value of goodwill by reportable segment for the years ended December 31, 20142015 and 20132014 are as follows:
 North America     International and Other Total North America     International and Other Total
Goodwill $552,596
 $105,553
 $658,149
 $543,628
 $103,079
 $646,707
Accumulated impairment loss (4,973) (65,173) (70,146) (4,973) (65,173) (70,146)
Balance at January 1, 2013 547,623
 40,380
 588,003
Acquisitions —
 —
 —
Foreign currency translation (8,968) (2,474) (11,442)
Balance at December 31, 2013 538,655
 37,906
 576,561
Acquisitions 6,996
 235,138
 242,134
Impairment charge —
 (11,400) (11,400)
Balance at January 1, 2014 538,655
 37,906
 576,561
Acquired during the period 6,996
 235,138
 242,134
Impairment —
 (11,400) (11,400)
Transfer to assets held for sale (1,448) —
 (1,448) (1,448) —
 (1,448)
Foreign currency translation (10,854) (2,038) (12,892) (10,854) (2,038) (12,892)
Balance at December 31, 2014 $533,349
 $259,606
 $792,955
 533,349
 259,606
 792,955
Acquired during the period 147,334
 —
 147,334
Impairment —
 (280,802) (280,802)
Purchase price allocation adjustments 1,575
 46,203
 47,778
Foreign currency translation (20,175) (2,838) (23,013)
Balance at December 31, 2015 $662,083
 $22,169
 $684,252
As discussed in Note 1, we perform our annual impairment test of goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets at the beginning of the fourth quarter. Our goodwill is currently attributed to six reporting units. For step one of our 2014 annual test, the percentage of excess fair value over carrying value was at least 50% for each of our six tested reporting units, with the exception of our India reporting unit, whose estimated fair value approximated its carrying value. As a result and given the sensitivity of the IndiaThe $280,802 impairment analysis to changes in the underlying assumptions, we performed a step two analysis which indicated goodwill impairment of $11,400. Our 2014 annual test of indefinite-lived intangible assets also resulted in a $4,500 pre-tax write-down of a trademark associated with the India business. These impairment charges werecharge recorded in the fourth quarter. We believe the impairments are largely a result of2015 resulted from our recent decision to exit the oils portion of the business and realign our approach to regional marketing and distribution in India.




interim

5764
THE HERSHEY COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except share data or if otherwise indicated)

reassessment of the valuation of the SGM business, coupled with the write-down of goodwill attributed to the China chocolate business in connection with the SGM acquisition. See Note 2 for additional information.
In 2014, the annual impairment testing of our India reporting unit resulted in a $11,400 goodwill impairment charge and a $4,500 pre-tax write-down of a trademark associated with the India business. These impairment charges were largely a result of our decision to exit the oils portion of the India business and realign our approach to regional marketing and distribution in India.
Our remaining goodwill is currently attributed to seven reporting units. For step one of our 2015 annual test, the percentage of excess fair value over carrying value was at least 50% for each of our seven tested reporting units, with the exception of our Krave reporting unit, representing a recently acquired business whose estimated fair value approximated its carrying value.
The following table provides the gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization for each major class of intangible asset:
December 31, 2014 2013 2015 2014
 Gross Carrying Amount Accumulated Amortization Gross Carrying Amount Accumulated Amortization Gross Carrying Amount Accumulated Amortization Gross Carrying Amount Accumulated Amortization
Amortized intangible assets:        
Intangible assets subject to amortization:        
Trademarks $129,223
 $(7,593) $66,274
 $(5,198) $227,511
 $(16,246) $129,223
 $(7,593)
Customer-related 138,964
 (20,404) 70,906
 (26,844) 146,532
 (26,643) 138,964
 (20,404)
Patents 18,383
 (11,447) 19,278
 (9,737) 16,857
 (12,481) 18,383
 (11,447)
Other 8,805
 (6,090) 9,906
 (5,861) —
 —
 8,805
 (6,090)
Total 295,375
 (45,534) 166,364
 (47,640) 390,900
 (55,370) 295,375
 (45,534)
                
Unamortized intangible assets:        
Trademarks with indefinite lives 45,000
   76,520
  
Total intangible assets, net $294,841
   $195,244
  
Intangible assets not subject to amortization:        
Trademarks 43,775
   45,000
  
Total other intangible assets $379,305
   $294,841
  
Total amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 was $22,306, $11,328 and 2012 was $11,328, $10,849, and $10,559, respectively.

Amortization expense for the next five years, based on current intangible balances, is estimated to be as follows:
Annual Amortization Expense 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Estimated amortization expense $16,676
 $16,629
 $16,253
 $13,972
 $13,792
Year ending December 31, 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Amortization expense $21,928
 $21,546
 $20,006
 $19,899
 $19,660
4. SHORT AND LONG-TERM DEBT
Short-term Debt
As a source of short-term financing, we utilize cash on hand and commercial paper or bank loans with an original maturity of three months or less. In October 2011, we entered intoWe maintain a new five-year agreement establishing an$1.0 billion unsecured revolving credit facility, to borrow up to $1.1 billion, withwhich currently expires in November 2020. The agreement also includes an option to increase borrowings by an additional $400,000 with the consent of the lenders. In November 2013, this agreement was amended to reduce the amount of borrowings available under the unsecured revolving credit facility to $1.0 billion, maintain the option to increase borrowings by an additional $400,000 with the consent of the lenders, and extend the termination date to November 2018. In November 2014, the termination date of this agreement was extended an additional year to November 2019. At December 31, 2014, we had outstanding commercial paper totaling $54,995, at a weighted average interest rate of 0.09%. We had no commercial paper borrowings at December 31, 2013.
The unsecured committed revolving credit agreement contains a financial covenant whereby the ratio of (a) pre-tax income from operations from the most recent four fiscal quarters to (b) consolidated interest expense for the most recent four fiscal quarters may not be less than 2.0 to 1.0 at the end of each fiscal quarter. The credit agreement also contains customary representations, warranties and events of default. Payment of outstanding advances may be accelerated, at the option of the lenders, should we default in our obligation under the credit agreement. As of December 31, 2014,2015, we complied with all customary affirmative and negative covenants and the financial covenant

65
THE HERSHEY COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except share data or if otherwise indicated)

pertaining to our credit agreement. There were no significant compensating balance agreements that legally restricted these funds.
In addition to the revolving credit facility, we maintain lines of credit with domestic and international commercial banks. Our credit limit in various currencies was $516,916 in 2015 and $447,629 in 2014 and $290,336 in 2013.2014. These lines permit us to borrow at the respective banks’ prime commercial interest rates, or lower. We had short-term foreign bank loans against these lines of credit for $313,520 and $329,701 in December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, and $165,961 in 2013.respectively. Commitment fees relating to our revolving credit facility and lines of credit are not material.
At December 31, 2015, we had outstanding commercial paper totaling $49,993, at a weighted average interest rate of 0.40%. At December 31, 2014, we had outstanding commercial paper totaling $54,995, at a weighted average interest rate of 0.09%.
The maximum amount of short-term borrowings outstanding during 2015 was $687,981. The weighted-average interest rate on short-term borrowings outstanding was 3.0% as of December 31, 2015 and 3.2% as of December 31, 2014.
Long-term Debt
Long-term debt consisted of the following:
December 31, 2015 2014
4.85% Notes due 2015 $—
 $250,000
5.45% Notes due 2016 250,000
 250,000
1.50% Notes due 2016 250,000
 250,000
1.60% Notes due 2018 300,000
 —
4.125% Notes due 2020 350,000
 350,000
8.8% Debentures due 2021 84,715
 100,000
2.625% Notes due 2023 250,000
 250,000
3.20% Notes due 2025 300,000
 —
7.2% Debentures due 2027 193,639
 250,000
Other obligations, net of debt issuance costs and unamortized debt discount 78,660
 93,122
Total long-term debt 2,057,014
 1,793,122
Less—current portion 499,923
 250,805
Long-term portion $1,557,091
 $1,542,317
In August 2015, we repaid $250,000 of 4.85% Notes due in 2015 at maturity with commercial paper. Also in August 2015, we issued $300,000 of 1.60% Notes due in 2018 and $300,000 of 3.20% Notes due in 2025 (the “Notes”). The Notes were issued under a shelf registration statement on Form S-3 filed in June 2015 that registered an indeterminate amount of debt securities.
In August 2015, we paid $100,165 to repurchase $71,646 of our long-term debt as part of a cash tender offer, consisting of $15,285 of our 8.80% Debentures due in 2021 and $56,361 of our 7.20% Debentures due in 2027. We used a portion of the proceeds from the Notes issued in August 2015 to fund the repurchase. As a result of the repurchase, we recorded interest expense of $28,326 which represented the premium paid for the tender offer as well as the write-off of the related unamortized debt discount and debt issuance costs. Upon extinguishment of the debt, we unwound the fixed-to-floating interest rate swaps related to the tendered bonds and recognized a gain of $278 currently in interest expense resulting from the hedging instruments.
In the third and fourth quarters of 2015, we reclassified to current liabilities $250,000 in outstanding principal of our 5.45% Notes which are due in September 2016 and $250,000 in outstanding principal of our 1.50% Notes which are due in November 2016, respectively. In the third quarter of 2014, we reclassified to current liabilities $250,000 in outstanding principal amount relating to our 4.85% Notes which came due in August 2015.

5866
THE HERSHEY COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except share data or if otherwise indicated)

The maximum amount of short-term borrowings outstanding during 2014 was $649,195. The weighted-average interest rate on short-term borrowings outstanding was 3.2% as of December 31, 2014 and 1.9% as of December 31, 2013.
Long-term Debt
Long-term debt consisted of the following:
December 31, 2014 2013
4.85% Notes due 2015 $250,000
 $250,000
5.45% Notes due 2016 250,000
 250,000
1.50% Notes due 2016 250,000
 250,000
4.125% Notes due 2020 350,000
 350,000
8.8% Debentures due 2021 100,000
 100,000
2.625% Notes due 2023 250,000
 250,000
7.2% Debentures due 2027 250,000
 250,000
Other obligations, net of unamortized debt discount 99,768
 96,056
Total long-term debt 1,799,768
 1,796,056
Less—current portion 250,805
 914
Long-term portion $1,548,963
 $1,795,142
In the third quarter of 2014, we reclassified to current liabilities $250,000 in outstanding principal amount relating to our 4.85% Notes which come due in August 2015.
In May 2012, we filed a Registration Statement on Form S-3 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission that registered an indeterminate amount of debt securities. In April 2013, we repaid $250,000 of 5.0% Notes due in 2013. In May 2013, we issued $250,000 of 2.625% Notes due in 2023 under this Registration Statement.
Aggregate annual maturities of long-term debt are as follows for the years ending December 31:
2015$250,805
2016506,342
$499,923
20171,454
120
20181,024
300,279
20191,111
367
2020350,462
Thereafter1,039,032
905,863
Our debt is principally unsecured and of equal priority. None of our debt is convertible into our Common Stock.
Interest Expense
Net interest expense consisted of the following:
For the years ended December 31, 2014 2013 2012 2015 2014 2013
Long-term debt and lease obligations $82,105
 $84,604
 $81,203
Short-term debt 11,672
 8,654
 23,084
Interest expense $93,520
 $93,777
 $93,258
Capitalized interest (6,179) (1,744) (5,778) (12,537) (6,179) (1,744)
Loss on extinguishment of debt 28,326
 —
 —
Interest expense 87,598
 91,514
 98,509
 109,309
 87,598
 91,514
Interest income (4,066) (3,158) (2,940) (3,536) (4,066) (3,158)
Interest expense, net $83,532
 $88,356
 $95,569
 $105,773
 $83,532
 $88,356

59
THE HERSHEY COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except share data or if otherwise indicated)

5. DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
We are exposed to market risks arising principally from changes in foreign currency exchange rates, interest rates and commodity prices. We use certain derivative instruments to manage these risks. These include interest rate swaps to manage interest rate risk, foreign currency forward exchange contracts and options to manage foreign currency exchange rate risk, and commodities futures and options contracts to manage commodity market price risk exposures.
We also use derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment. We account for such derivatives at market value with the resulting gains and losses reflected in the income statement.
In entering into these contracts, we have assumed the risk that might arise from the possible inability of counterparties to meet the terms of their contracts. We mitigate this risk by entering into exchanged-traded contracts with collateral posting requirements and/or by performing financial assessments prior to contract execution, conducting periodic evaluations of counterparty performance and maintaining a diverse portfolio of qualified counterparties. We do not expect any significant losses from counterparty defaults.
Commodity Price Risk
We enter into commodities futures and options contracts and other commodity derivative instruments to reduce the effect of future price fluctuations associated with the purchase of raw materials, energy requirements and transportation services. We generally hedge commodity price risks for 3- to 24-month periods. TheThrough 2015, we have designated the majority of our commodity derivative instruments meet hedge accounting requirements and are designated as cash flow hedges.hedges under the hedge accounting requirements. We account for the effective portion of mark-to-market gains and losses on commodity derivative instruments in other comprehensive income, to be recognized in cost of sales in the same period that we record the hedged raw material requirements in cost of sales. The ineffective portion of gains and losses is recorded currently in cost of sales. Cocoa commodity derivatives did not qualify for hedge accounting treatment as of the beginning of the third quarter of 2015. Therefore, changes in the fair value of these derivatives were recorded as incurred within cost of sales for the third and fourth quarters of 2015.

Effective January 1, 2016, we are no longer electing to designate any of our existing or new cocoa or other commodity derivatives for hedge accounting treatment.  Additionally, we have revised our definition of segment income and redefined non-GAAP income and earnings per share measures to exclude gains and losses on commodity derivatives until the related inventory is sold.  This change to our definition of segment income and non-GAAP income and non-GAAP earnings per share will continue to reflect the derivative gains and losses with the underlying economic

67
THE HERSHEY COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except share data or if otherwise indicated)

exposure being hedged and thereby eliminate the mark-to-market volatility within our reported segment income as well as non-GAAP income and non-GAAP earnings per share.
Foreign Exchange Price Risk
We are exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risk related to our international operations, including non-functional currency intercompany debt and other non-functional currency transactions of certain subsidiaries. Principal currencies hedged include the euro, Canadian dollar, Malaysian ringgit, Swiss franc, Chinese renminbi, Japanese yen, and Brazilian real. We typically utilize foreign currency forward exchange contracts and options to hedge these exposures for periods ranging from 3 to 24 months. The contracts are either designated as cash flow hedges or are undesignated. The net notional amount of foreign exchange contracts accounted for as cash flow hedges was $10,752 at December 31, 2015 and $22,725 at December 31, 2014 and $158,375 at December 31, 2013.2014. The effective portion of the changes in fair value on these contracts is recorded in other comprehensive income and reclassified into earnings in the same period in which the hedged transactions affect earnings. The net notional amount of foreign exchange contracts that are not designated as accounting hedges was $2,791 at December 31, 2015 and $4,144 at December 31, 2014 and $2,823 at December 31, 2013.2014. The change in fair value on these instruments is recorded directly in cost of sales or selling, marketing and administrative expense, depending on the nature of the underlying exposure.
Interest Rate Risk
In order to manage interest rate exposure, from time to time we enter into interest rate swap agreements that effectively convert variable rate debt to a fixed interest rate. These swaps are designated as cash flow hedges, with gains and losses deferred in other comprehensive income to be recognized as an adjustment to interest expense in the same period that the hedged interest payments affect earnings. The notional amount of interest rate derivative instruments in cash flow hedging relationships was $500,000 at December 31, 2015 and $750,000 at December 31, 2014 and $250,000 at December 31, 2013.2014.
We also manage our targeted mix of fixed and floating rate debt with debt issuances and by entering into fixed-to-floating interest rate swaps in order to mitigate fluctuations in earnings and cash flows that may result from interest rate volatility. These swaps are designated as fair value hedges, for which the gain or loss on the derivative and the offsetting loss or gain on the hedged item are recognized in current earnings as interest expense (income), net. The notional amount, interest payment and maturity date of these swaps generally match the principal, interest payment and maturity date of the related debt, and the swaps are valued using observable benchmark rates (Level 2 valuation). The notional amount of interest rate derivative instruments in fair value hedge relationships was $450,000$350,000 at December 31, 2014.2015. We had no$450,000 derivative instruments in fair value hedge relationships at December 31, 2013.2014.

60
THE HERSHEY COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except share data or if otherwise indicated)

Equity Price Risk
We are exposed to market price changes in certain broad market indices related to our deferred compensation obligations to our employees. In the first quarter of 2014, we entered into equity swap contracts to hedge the portion of the exposure that is linked to market-level equity returns. These contracts are not designated as hedges for accounting purposes and are entered into for periods of 3 to 12 months. The change in fair value of these derivatives is recorded in selling, marketing and administrative expense, together with the change in the related liabilities. The notional amount of the contracts settled onoutstanding at December 31, 20142015 was $26,417.$22,230.
Fair Value
Accounting guidance on fair value measurements requires that financial assets and liabilities be classified and disclosed in one of the following categories of the fair value hierarchy:
Level 1 – Based on unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in an active market.
Level 2 – Based on observable market-based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data.
Level 3 – Based on unobservable inputs that reflect the entity's own assumptions about the assumptions that a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability.
We did not have any level 3 financial assets or liabilities, nor were there any transfers between levels during the periods presented.

68
THE HERSHEY COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except share data or if otherwise indicated)

The following table presents assets and liabilities that were measured at fair value in the Consolidated Balance Sheet on a recurring basis as of December 31, 20142015 and 2013:2014:
December 31, 2014 2013 2015 2014
 Assets (1) Liabilities (1) Assets (1) Liabilities (1) Assets (1) Liabilities (1) Assets (1) Liabilities (1)
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedging instruments:                
Commodities futures and options (2) $—
 $9,944
 $4,306
 $129
 $—
 $479
 $—
 $9,944
Foreign exchange contracts (3) 2,196
 2,447
 2,813
 —
 367
 475
 2,196
 2,447
Interest rate swap agreements (4) —
 29,505
 22,745
 —
 —
 40,299
 —
 29,505
Cross-currency swap agreement (5) 2,016
 —
 —
 —
 —
 —
 2,016
 —
 4,212
 41,896
 29,864
 129
 367
 41,253
 4,212
 41,896
Derivatives designated as fair value hedging instruments:                
Interest rate swap agreements (4) 1,746
 —
 —
 —
 4,313
 —
 1,746
 —
                
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:                
Commodities futures and options (2) —
 1,574
 —
 —
Deferred compensation derivatives (6) 1,074
 —
 —
 —
 1,198
 —
 1,074
 —
Foreign exchange contracts (3) 4,049
 2,334
 610
 198
 69
 —
 4,049
 2,334
 5,123
 2,334
 610
 198
 1,267
 1,574
 5,123
 2,334
Total $11,081
 $44,230
 $30,474
 $327
 $5,947
 $42,827
 $11,081
 $44,230

(1)Derivatives assets are classified on our balance sheet within prepaid expenses and other as well as other assets. Derivative liabilities are classified on our balance sheet within accrued liabilities and other long-term liabilities.
(2)The fair value of commodities futures and options contracts is based on quoted market prices and is, therefore, categorized as Level 1 within the fair value hierarchy. As of December 31, 2014,2015, liabilities include the net of assets of $51,225$54,090 and liabilities of $56,840$54,860 associated with cash transfers receivable or payable on commodities futures contracts reflecting the change in quoted market prices on the last trading day for the period. The comparable amounts reflected on a net basis in liabilities at December 31, 20132014 were assets of $23,780$51,225 and liabilities of $56,840. At December 31, 2015, the remaining amount reflected in liabilities related to the fair value of other non-exchange traded derivative instruments. At December 31, 2014, the amount reflected in assets related to the fair value of options contracts.

61
THE HERSHEY COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except share data or if otherwise indicated)

liabilities of $23,909. At December 31, 2014, the remaining amount reflected in liabilities related to the fair value of options contracts and other non-exchange traded derivative instruments. At December 31, 2013, the amount reflected in assets related to the fair value of options contracts.
(3)The fair value of foreign currency forward exchange contracts is the difference between the contract and current market foreign currency exchange rates at the end of the period. We estimate the fair value of foreign currency forward exchange contracts on a quarterly basis by obtaining market quotes of spot and forward rates for contracts with similar terms, adjusted where necessary for maturity differences. These contracts are classified as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy.
(4)The fair value of interest rate swap agreements represents the difference in the present value of cash flows calculated at the contracted interest rates and at current market interest rates at the end of the period. We calculate the fair value of interest rate swap agreements quarterly based on the quoted market price for the same or similar financial instruments. Such contracts are categorized as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy.
(5)The fair value of the cross-currency swap agreement is categorized as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy and is estimated based on the difference between the contract and current market foreign currency exchange rates at the end of the period.
(6)The fair value of deferred compensation derivatives is based on quotesquoted prices for market interest rates and a broad market equity index and is, therefore, categorized as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy.

69
THE HERSHEY COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except share data or if otherwise indicated)

Other Financial Instruments
The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, accounts receivable, accounts payable and short-term debt approximated fair value as of December 31, 20142015 and December 31, 20132014 because of the relatively short maturity of these instruments.
The estimated fair value of our long-term debt is based on quoted market prices for similar debt issues and is, therefore, classified as Level 2 within the valuation hierarchy. The fair values and carrying values of long-term debt, including the current portion, was as follows:
 Fair Value Carrying Value  Fair Value Carrying Value
At December 31,At December 31, 2014 2013 2014 2013At December 31, 2015 2014 2015 2014
Current portion of long-term debtCurrent portion of long-term debt $257,280
 $914
 $250,805
 $914
Current portion of long-term debt $509,580
 $257,280
 $499,923
 $250,805
Long-term debtLong-term debt 1,722,308
 1,947,023
 1,548,963
 1,795,142
Long-term debt 1,668,379
 1,715,662
 1,557,091
 1,542,317
TotalTotal $1,979,588
 $1,947,937
 $1,799,768
 $1,796,056
Total $2,177,959
 $1,972,942
 $2,057,014
 $1,793,122
Other Fair Value Measurements
In addition to assets and liabilities that are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis, U.S. GAAP requires that, under certain circumstances, we also record assets and liabilities at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. Generally, assets are recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as a result of impairment charges. As discussed in Note 2, we conducted an interim impairment test on the goodwill generated by the SGM acquisition, which resulted in connection with the planned Mauna Loa divestiture, we classified the net assets as held for sale as of December 31, 2014, resulting in an impairment charge of $18,531 based upon the agreed-upon sales price and related transaction costs. The loss was calculated based on Level 3 inputs and included in 2014 earnings. Also incharges totaling $280,802. In 2014, as discussed in Note 3, in connection with our annual impairment testing of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets, we recorded impairment charges totaling $15,900 relating to our India business. These charges were determined by comparing the fair value of the assets to their carrying value. The fair value of the assets was derived using discounted cash flow analyses based on Level 3 inputs.
As discussed in Note 2, in connection with the planned Mauna Loa divestiture, we classified the net assets as held for sale as of December 31, 2014, resulting in a write down of $18,531 based upon the agreed-upon sales price and related transaction costs. The loss was calculated based on Level 3 inputs and included in 2014 earnings.

6270
THE HERSHEY COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except share data or if otherwise indicated)

Income Statement Impact of Derivative Instruments
The effect of derivative instruments on the Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 20142015 and December 31, 20132014 was as follows:
 Non-designated Hedges Cash Flow Hedges Non-designated Hedges Cash Flow Hedges
  
 Gains (losses) recognized in income (a) Gains (losses) recognized in other comprehensive income (“OCI”) (effective portion) Gains (losses) reclassified from accumulated OCI into income (effective portion) (b) Gains recognized in income (ineffective portion) (c) Gains (losses) recognized in income (a) Gains (losses) recognized in other comprehensive income (“OCI”) (effective portion) Gains (losses) reclassified from accumulated OCI into income (effective portion) (b) Gains recognized in income (ineffective portion) (c)
                                
 2014 2013 2014 2013 2014 2013 2014 2013 2015 2014 2015 2014 2015 2014 2015 2014
Commodities futures and options $2,339
 $—
 $(11,165) $84,746
 $68,500
 $(8,400) $2,498
 $3,241
 $(2,777) $2,339
 $84,382
 $(11,165) $40,600
 $68,500
 $987
 $2,498
Foreign exchange contracts (1,486) —
 2,056
 4,049
 3,403
 2,641
 —
 —
 487
 (1,486) (155) 2,056
 956
 3,403
 —
 —
Interest rate swap agreements —
 —
 (52,249) 27,534
 (4,500) (3,606) —
 —
 —
 —
 (22,388) (52,249) (4,922) (4,500) —
 —
Deferred compensation derivatives 2,983
 —
 —
 —
 —
 —
 —
 —
 173
 2,983
 —
 —
 —
 —
 —
 —
Total $3,836
 $—
 $(61,358) $116,329
 $67,403
 $(9,365) $2,498
 $3,241
 $(2,117) $3,836
 $61,839
 $(61,358) $36,634
 $67,403
 $987
 $2,498

(a)Gains (losses) recognized in income for non-designated commodities futures and options contracts were included in cost of sales. Gains (losses) recognized in income for non-designated foreign currency forward exchange contracts and deferred compensation derivatives were included in selling, marketing and administrative expenses.
(b)Gains (losses) reclassified from AOCI into income were included in cost of sales for commodities futures and options contracts and for foreign currency forward exchange contracts designated as hedges of purchases of inventory or other productive assets. Other gains (losses) for foreign currency forward exchange contracts were included in selling, marketing and administrative expenses. For the year ended December 31, 2014, this included $3,801 relating to unrealized gains on foreign currency forward exchange contracts that were reclassified from AOCI to selling, marketing and administrative expenses as a result of the discontinuance of cash flow hedge accounting because it was determined to be probable that the original forecasted transactions would not occur within the time period originally designated or the subsequent two months thereafter. Losses reclassified from AOCI into income for interest rate swap agreements were included in interest expense.
(c)Gains representing hedge ineffectiveness were included in cost of sales for commodities futures and options contracts.
The amount of net gains on derivative instruments, including interest rate swap agreements, foreign currency forward exchange contracts and options, commodities futures and options contracts, and other commodity derivative instruments expected to be reclassified into earnings in the next 12 months was approximately $377$15,005 after tax as of December 31, 2014.2015. This amount was primarily associated with commodities futures contracts.
Fair Value Hedges
For the yearyears ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, we recognized a net pretax benefit to interest expense of $6,905 and $938 relating to our fixed-to-floating interest swap arrangements.

6371
THE HERSHEY COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except share data or if otherwise indicated)

6. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
A summary of the components of comprehensive income is as follows:
For the year ended December 31, 2014 Pre-Tax
Amount		 Tax
(Expense)
Benefit		 After-Tax
Amount
For the year ended December 31, 2015 Pre-Tax
Amount		 Tax
(Expense)
Benefit		 After-Tax
Amount
Net income     $846,912
     $512,951
Other comprehensive loss:      
Other comprehensive income (loss):      
Foreign currency translation adjustments $(26,851) $—
 (26,851) $(59,707) $—
 (59,707)
Pension and post-retirement benefit plans(a) (135,361) 50,345
 (85,016) 46,910
 (16,908) 30,002
Cash flow hedges:            
Losses on cash flow hedging derivatives (61,358) 24,281
 (37,077)
Gains on cash flow hedging derivatives 61,839
 (23,520) 38,319
Reclassification adjustments(b) (67,403) 24,341
 (43,062) (36,634) 13,416
 (23,218)
Total other comprehensive loss $(290,973) $98,967
 (192,006)
Comprehensive income     $654,906
Total other comprehensive income (loss) $12,408
 $(27,012) (14,604)
Total comprehensive income     $498,347
Comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling interests     2,152
Comprehensive income attributable to The Hershey Company     $500,499
 
For the year ended December 31, 2013 Pre-Tax
Amount		 Tax
(Expense)
Benefit		 After-Tax
Amount
For the year ended December 31, 2014 Pre-Tax
Amount		 Tax
(Expense)
Benefit		 After-Tax
Amount
Net income     $820,470
     $846,912
Other comprehensive income (loss):      
Other comprehensive loss:      
Foreign currency translation adjustments $(26,003) $—
 (26,003) $(26,851) $—
 (26,851)
Pension and post-retirement benefit plans(a) 265,015
 (98,612) 166,403
 (135,361) 50,345
 (85,016)
Cash flow hedges:            
Gains on cash flow hedging derivatives 116,329
 (43,995) 72,334
Losses on cash flow hedging derivatives (61,358) 24,281
 (37,077)
Reclassification adjustments(b) 9,365
 (3,590) 5,775
 (67,403) 24,341
 (43,062)
Total other comprehensive income $364,706
 $(146,197) 218,509
Comprehensive income     $1,038,979
Total other comprehensive loss $(290,973) $98,967
 (192,006)
Total comprehensive income     $654,906
 
For the year ended December 31, 2012 Pre-Tax
Amount		 Tax
(Expense)
Benefit		 After-Tax
Amount
For the year ended December 31, 2013 Pre-Tax
Amount		 Tax
(Expense)
Benefit		 After-Tax
Amount
Net income     $660,931
     $820,470
Other comprehensive income (loss):            
Foreign currency translation adjustments $7,714
 $—
 7,714
 $(26,003) $—
 (26,003)
Pension and post-retirement benefit plans(a) (15,159) 5,525
 (9,634) 265,015
 (98,612) 166,403
Cash flow hedges:            
Losses on cash flow hedging derivatives (543) (325) (868)
Gains on cash flow hedging derivatives 116,329
 (43,995) 72,334
Reclassification adjustments(b) 96,993
 (36,950) 60,043
 9,365
 (3,590) 5,775
Total other comprehensive income $89,005
 $(31,750) 57,255
 $364,706
 $(146,197) 218,509
Comprehensive income     $718,186
Total comprehensive income     $1,038,979

(a)These amounts are included in the computation of net periodic benefit costs. For more information, see Note 9.
(b)For information on the presentation of reclassification adjustments for cash flow hedges on the Consolidated Statements of Income, see Note 5.

6472
THE HERSHEY COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except share data or if otherwise indicated)

The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss, as shown on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, are as follows:
December 31, 2014 2013 2015 2014
Foreign currency translation adjustments $(43,681) $(16,830) $(101,236) $(43,681)
Pension and post-retirement benefit plans, net of tax (284,650) (199,634) (254,648) (284,650)
Cash flow hedges, net of tax (30,242) 49,897
 (15,141) (30,242)
Total accumulated other comprehensive loss $(358,573) $(166,567) $(371,025) $(358,573)
7. INCOME TAXES
Our income (loss) before income taxes was as follows:
For the years ended December 31, 2014 2013 2012 2015 2014 2013
Domestic $1,320,738
 $1,252,208
 $980,176
 $1,357,618
 $1,320,738
 $1,252,208
Foreign (14,695) (889) 35,403
 (455,771) (14,695) (889)
Income before income taxes $1,306,043
 $1,251,319
 $1,015,579
 $901,847
 $1,306,043
 $1,251,319
Our provision for income taxes was as follows:
For the years ended December 31, 2014 2013 2012 2015 2014 2013
Current:            
Federal $385,642
 $372,649
 $299,122
 $409,060
 $385,642
 $372,649
State 52,331
 47,980
 36,187
 47,978
 52,331
 47,980
Foreign 2,362
 2,763
 5,554
 (29,605) 2,362
 2,763
Current provision for income taxes 440,335
 423,392
 340,863
 427,433
 440,335
 423,392
Deferred:            
Federal 20,649
 11,334
 5,174
 (31,153) 20,649
 11,334
State 2,725
 2,212
 1,897
 (2,346) 2,725
 2,212
Foreign (4,578) (6,089) 6,714
 (5,038) (4,578) (6,089)
Deferred income tax provision 18,796
 7,457
 13,785
 (38,537) 18,796
 7,457
Total provision for income taxes $459,131
 $430,849
 $354,648
 $388,896
 $459,131
 $430,849
The increasedecrease in the federal deferred tax provision in 20142015 was primarily due to higher deferred tax liabilitiesassets associated with bonus depreciationreserves and inventory in 20142015 compared with 2013. The foreign deferred tax benefit in 2014 principally reflected higher deferred tax assets related to advertising and promotion reserves.2014.
The income tax benefit associated with stock-based compensation of $53,497$24,839 and $48,396$53,497 for the years ended December 31, 20142015 and 2013,2014, respectively, reduced accrued income taxes on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. We credited additional paid-in capital to reflect these excess income tax benefits.

6573
THE HERSHEY COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except share data or if otherwise indicated)

Deferred taxes reflect temporary differences between the tax basis and financial statement carrying value of assets and liabilities. The significant temporary differences that comprised the deferred tax assets and liabilities were as follows:
December 31, 2014 2013 2015 2014
Deferred tax assets:        
Post-retirement benefit obligations $109,973
 $101,674
 $95,763
 $109,973
Accrued expenses and other reserves 139,492
 119,387
 163,908
 139,492
Stock-based compensation 46,061
 47,324
 46,665
 46,061
Derivative instruments 14,954
 —
 8,858
 19,171
Pension 24,584
 —
 28,940
 24,584
Lease financing obligation 18,991
 19,065
 18,947
 18,991
Accrued trade promotion reserves 41,332
 39,234
 36,501
 41,332
Net operating loss carryforwards 50,044
 39,606
 99,155
 50,044
Basis difference on assets held for sale 43,155
 —
Capital loss carryforwards 44,546
 43,155
Other 7,425
 11,754
 14,444
 3,208
Gross deferred tax assets 496,011
 378,044
 557,727
 496,011
Valuation allowance (147,223) (87,159) (207,055) (147,223)
Total deferred tax assets 348,788
 290,885
 350,672
 348,788
Deferred tax liabilities:        
Property, plant and equipment, net 221,389
 201,224
 218,729
 221,389
Acquired intangibles 85,037
 64,249
 120,420
 85,037
Inventories 32,157
 33,885
 20,063
 32,157
Derivative instruments —
 33,779
Pension —
 8,037
Other 9,063
 1,404
 8,258
 9,063
Total deferred tax liabilities 347,646
 342,578
 367,470
 347,646
Net deferred tax (liabilities) assets $1,142
 $(51,693) $(16,798) $1,142
Included in:        
Current deferred tax assets, net $100,515
 $52,511
 $—
 $100,515
Non-current deferred tax assets, net 36,390
 —
Non-current deferred tax liabilities, net (99,373) (104,204) (53,188) (99,373)
Net deferred tax (liabilities) assets $1,142
 $(51,693) $(16,798) $1,142
We believe that it is more likely than not that the results of future operations will generate sufficient taxable income to realize the net deferred tax assets. Changes in deferred tax assets andfor net operating loss carryforwards resulted primarily from current year losses in foreign jurisdictions. Changes in deferred tax liabilities for derivative instruments reflected the tax impact on net losses as of December 31, 2014 and on net gains as of December 31, 2013. Changes in deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities for pensionacquired intangibles resulted from book intangibles related to the changeKrave acquisition in funded status of our pension plans as of December 31, 2014 compared with December 31, 2013.2015. Additional information on income tax benefits and expenses related to components of accumulated other comprehensive loss is provided in Note 6.
The valuation allowances as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 and 2013 wereare primarily related to temporary differences associated with advertising and promotions, U.S. capital loss carryforwards and various foreign jurisdictions' taxnet operating loss carryforwards.carryforwards and other deferred tax assets that we do not expect to realize. 


6674
THE HERSHEY COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except share data or if otherwise indicated)

The following table reconciles the federal statutory income tax rate with our effective income tax rate:
For the years ended December 31, 2014 2013 2012
Federal statutory income tax rate 35.0 % 35.0 % 35.0 %
Increase (reduction) resulting from:      
State income taxes, net of Federal income tax benefits 3.0
 2.8
 3.2
Qualified production income deduction (2.4) (2.6) (2.5)
Business realignment and impairment charges and gain on sale of trademark licensing rights 0.7
 0.1
 0.2
International operations (0.1) (0.4) (0.1)
Other, net (1.0) (0.5) (0.9)
Effective income tax rate 35.2 % 34.4 % 34.9 %
The effective income tax rate for 2014 was higher than the effective income tax rate for 2013 due to the impact of tax rates associated with business realignment activities and impairment charges. The reduction in the 2013 effective income tax rate from international operations resulted from an increase in deductions associated with certain foreign tax jurisdictions. The 2012 impact from state income taxes reflects the impact of certain state tax legislation.
For the years ended December 31, 2015 2014 2013
Federal statutory income tax rate 35.0 % 35.0 % 35.0 %
Increase (reduction) resulting from:      
State income taxes, net of Federal income tax benefits 4.2
 3.0
 2.8
Qualified production income deduction (4.4) (2.4) (2.6)
Business realignment and impairment charges and gain on sale of trademark licensing rights 10.8
 0.7
 0.1
International operations 2.2
 (0.1) (0.4)
Historic and solar tax credits (3.3) —
 —
Other, net (1.4) (1.0) (0.5)
Effective income tax rate 43.1 % 35.2 % 34.4 %
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:
December 31, 2014 2013 2015 2014
Balance at beginning of year $103,963
 $51,520
 $32,230
 $103,963
Additions for tax positions taken during prior years —
 58,246
 1,122
 —
Reductions for tax positions taken during prior years (71,643) (5,776) (2,112) (71,643)
Additions for tax positions taken during the current year 8,403
 5,523
 6,623
 8,403
Settlements (4,643) —
 (702) (4,643)
Expiration of statutes of limitations (3,850) (5,550) (3,750) (3,850)
Balance at end of year $32,230
 $103,963
 $33,411
 $32,230
The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate was $25,947 as of December 31, 2015 and $23,502 as of December 31, 2014 and $31,712 as of December 31, 2013.2014.
We report accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. We recognized a net tax expense of $1,153 in 2015, a net tax benefit of $9,082 in 2014 and a net tax expense of $5,901 in 2013 and a net tax benefit of $5,270 in 2012 for interest and penalties. Accrued net interest and penalties were $3,791 as of December 31, 2015 and $2,638 as of December 31, 2014 and $11,718 as of December 31, 2013.2014.
We file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state and foreign jurisdictions. A number of years may elapse before an uncertain tax position, for which we have unrecognized tax benefits, is audited and finally resolved. While it is often difficult to predict the final outcome or the timing of resolution of any particular uncertain tax position, we believe that our unrecognized tax benefits reflect the most likely outcome. We adjust these unrecognized tax benefits, as well as the related interest, in light of changing facts and circumstances. Settlement of any particular position could require the use of cash. Favorable resolution would be recognized as a reduction to our effective income tax rate in the period of resolution.
The number of years with open tax audits varies depending on the tax jurisdiction. Our major taxing jurisdictions include the United States (federal and state), Canada, China and Mexico. U.S., Canadian, Chinese and Mexican federal audit issues typically involve the timing of deductions and transfer pricing adjustments. During the first quarter of 2013, the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) commenced its audit of our U.S. income tax returns for 2009 through 2011. The audit was concluded in the second quarter of 2014. Tax examinations by various state taxing authorities could be conducted for years beginning in 2011.2012.

67
THE HERSHEY COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except share data or if otherwise indicated)

We are no longer subject to Canadian federal income tax examinations by the Canada Revenue Agency (“CRA”) for years before 2007. The CRA commenced its audit of our Canadian income tax returns for 2010 through 2012 in the second quarter of 2014. During the fourth quarter of 2013, the CRA concluded its audit for 2007 through 2009 and issued a letter to us indicating proposed adjustments primarily associated with business realignment charges and transfer pricing. During the third quarter of 2014, the CRA withdrew the proposed adjustments related to business

75
THE HERSHEY COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except share data or if otherwise indicated)

realignment charges and transfer pricing of inventory, and we paid a $2,212 assessment related to other cross-border adjustments. During the fourth quarter of 2014, the CRA concluded its audit for 2010 through 2012 and issued a letter to us indicating proposed transfer pricing adjustments. We provided notice to the U.S. Competent Authority and the CRA provided notice to the Canada Competent Authority of the likely need for their assistance to resolve the adjustments. Accordingly, as of December 31, 2014,2015, we recorded a non-current receivable of approximately $1,568$1,428 associated with the anticipated resolution of the adjustments by the Competent Authority of each country.
We are no longer subject to Chinese federal income tax examinations by the China State Administration of Taxation ("China SAT") for years before 2010. We are no longer subject to Mexican federal income tax examinations by the Servicio de Administracion Tributaria (“Mexico SAT”) for years before 2009.2010. We work with the IRS, the CRA, the China SAT and the Mexico SAT to resolve proposed audit adjustments and to minimize the amount of adjustments. We do not anticipate that any potential tax adjustments will have a significant impact on our financial position or results of operations.
We reasonably expect reductions in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits of approximately $6,407$8,649 within the next 12 months because of the expiration of statutes of limitations and settlements of tax audits.
As of December 31, 2014,2015, we had approximately $195,887$239,099 of undistributed earnings of our international subsidiaries. We intend to continue to reinvest earnings outside the United States for the foreseeable future and, therefore, have not recognized any U.S. tax expense on these earnings.

Investments in Partnerships Qualifying for Tax Credits
In the second quarter of 2015, the Company began making investments in partnership entities which make equity investments in projects eligible to receive federal historic and energy tax credits. The investments are accounted for under the equity method and reported within other assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The tax credits, when realized, are recognized as a reduction of tax expense, at which time the corresponding equity investment is written-down to reflect the remaining value of the future benefits to be realized. For the year ended December 31, 2015, we recognized investment tax credits and related outside basis difference benefit totaling $43,437, and we wrote-down the equity investment by $39,489 to reflect the realization of these benefits. The equity investment write-down is reflected within other (income) expense, net in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
8. BUSINESS REALIGNMENT AND IMPAIRMENT CHARGESACTIVITIES
BusinessExpenses recorded for business realignment activities during 2015, 2014 and impairment charges recorded during 2014, 2013 and 2012 were as follows:
For the years ended December 31, 2014 2013 2012
Cost of sales - Next Century and other programs $1,622
 $402
 $36,383
Selling, marketing and administrative - Next Century and other programs 2,947
 18
 2,446
Business realignment and impairment charges:      
Next Century program:      
Pension settlement loss —
 —
 15,787
Plant closure expenses 7,465
 16,387
 20,780
Employee separation costs —
 —
 914
Planned divestiture of Mauna Loa 22,256
 —
 —
India impairment 15,900
 —
 —
India voluntary retirement program —
 2,278
 —
Tri-US, Inc. asset impairment charges —
 —
 7,457
Total business realignment and impairment charges 45,621
 18,665
 44,938
Total charges associated with business realignment initiatives $50,190
 $19,085
 $83,767
For the years ended December 31, 2015 2014 2013
Cost of sales:      
Other international restructuring programs $8,801
 $—
 $—
     Next Century program —
 1,622
 402
Total cost of sales 8,801
 1,622
 402
Selling, marketing and administrative:      
2015 productivity initiative 13,614
 —
 —
Other international restructuring programs 3,754
 2,947
 18
Total selling, marketing and administrative 17,368
 2,947
 18
Business realignment charges:      
2015 productivity initiative 92,139
 —
 —
Next Century program - plant closure expenses —
 7,465
 16,387
Divestiture of Mauna Loa (see Note 2) 2,667
 22,256
 —
India voluntary retirement program —
 —
 2,278
Total business realignment charges 94,806
 29,721
 18,665
Total charges associated with business realignment activities $120,975
 $34,290
 $19,085


6876
THE HERSHEY COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except share data or if otherwise indicated)

Next Century Program
InOn June 2010,19, 2015, we announced Project Next Centurya new productivity initiative (the “Next Century program”“2015 Productivity Initiative”) as part ofintended to move decision making closer to the customer and the consumer, to enable a more enterprise-wide approach to innovation, to more swiftly advance our ongoing effortsknowledge agenda, and to create an advantaged supply chainprovide for a more efficient cost structure, while ensuring that we effectively allocate resources to future growth areas. Overall, the 2015 Productivity Initiative is intended to simplify the organizational structure to enhance the Company's ability to rapidly anticipate and competitive cost structure. As partrespond to the changing demands of the program, productionglobal consumer.

The 2015 Productivity Initiative was transitioned fromexecuted throughout the Company's century-old facility at 19 East Chocolate Avenuethird and fourth quarters, resulting in Hershey, Pennsylvania, to an expanded West Hershey facility, which was built in 1992. The Next Century program is substantially complete asa net reduction of approximately 300 positions, with the majority of the departures taking place by the end of 2015. For the year ended December 31, 2014. Project-to-date2015, we incurred charges totaling $105,753, representing employee severance and related separation benefits as well as incremental third-party costs totaled $197.9 million through December 31, 2014, in line with our estimates of total pre-tax charges and non-recurring project implementation costs of $190 million to $200 million.
In 2014 and 2013, plant closure and other expenses were primarily related to costs associated with the demolitiondesign and implementation of the former manufacturing facility.
In 2012, chargesnew organizational structure. This also includes a pension settlement cost of $10,178 relating to the Next Century program included the following: $36,383 recorded in cost of sales related primarily to start-up costs and accelerated depreciation of fixed assets over the reduced estimated remaining useful lives; $2,446 recorded in selling, marketing and administrative expense for project administration; business realignment charges of $15,787 relating to a non-cash pension settlement loss resulting from lump sum withdrawals by employees retiring or leaving the Company primarily in connection withas a result of this program.

Total pre-tax charges and costs for this program are expected to be approximately $120 million, the Next Century program; and $20,780 primarily related to costs associated withmajority of which are cash. This excludes the closureimpact of the former manufacturing facility2015 pension settlement costs and any additional pension settlement costs that could be triggered by additional lump sum withdrawals in 2016. The remaining costs for the relocation2015 Initiative are expected to be incurred within the first three quarters of production lines.2016.
Planned divestiture of Mauna Loa
In December 2014, we entered into an agreement to sell Mauna Loa. In connection with the anticipated sale, we have recorded an estimated loss of $22,256 to reflect the disposal entity at fair value, less an estimate of the selling costs. See Note 2 for additional information.
India impairment
In connection with our annual goodwill and other intangible asset impairment testing, in December 2014, we recorded a non-cash goodwill and other intangible asset impairment charge of $15,900 associated with our business in India. See Note 3 for additional information.
Other international restructuring2015 charges for business realignment activities relate principally to accelerated depreciation and amortization and employee severance costs for a couple of programs
During commenced in 2014 we implemented restructuring programs at several non-U.S. entities to rationalize selectcertain non-U.S. manufacturing and distribution activities resultingand to establish our own sales and distribution teams in severanceBrazil in connection with our exit from the Bauducco joint venture.

The 2014 and 2013 charges shown above relate primarily to the demolition of the Company's former manufacturing facility, representing the final phase of the Project Next Century program. This was program was substantially complete as of December 31, 2014.
Segment operating results do not include business realignment and related charges because we evaluate segment performance excluding such charges.
The following table summarizes our business realignment activity for the year ended December 31, 2015:
 Employee related costs Other exit costs Other implementation costs Total
Liability balance at December 31, 2014$79
 $—
 $—
 $79
2015 business realignment charges81,961
 —
 6,785
 88,746
Cash payments(65,336) —
 (6,785) (72,121)
Other, net(394) —
 —
 (394)
Liability balance at December 31, 2015$16,310
 $—
 $—
 $16,310
The charges reflected in the liability roll-forward above do not include items charged directly to expense, such as accelerated depreciation costsand amortization and the loss on the Mauna Loa divestiture and certain of $4,476. These costs were recorded within cost of sales and selling, marketing andthe administrative expenses. We expect to incur approximately $3,700 of additional accelerated depreciation in 2015; other remaining costs relating to these programs are not expected to be significant.
Tri-US, Inc. impairment charges
In December 2012, the board of directors of Tri-US, Inc., a company that manufactured, marketed and sold nutritional beverages in which we held a controlling ownership interest decided to cease operations as a result of operational difficulties, quality issues and competitive constraints. It was determined that investments necessary to continue the business would not generate a sufficient return. Accordingly, in December 2012, the Company recorded non-cash asset impairment charges of $7,457, primarily associated with the write off of goodwill and other intangible assets. These charges excluded2015 Initiative, as those items are not reflected in the portion of the losses attributable to the noncontrolling interests.business realignment liability in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

77
THE HERSHEY COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except share data or if otherwise indicated)

9. PENSION AND OTHER POST-RETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS
We sponsor a number of defined benefit pension plans. The primary plans are The Hershey Company Retirement Plan and The Hershey Company Retirement Plan for Hourly Employees. These are cash balance plans that provide pension benefits for most domestic employees hired prior to January 1, 2007. We also sponsor two post-retirement benefit plans: health care and life insurance. The health care plan is contributory, with participants’ contributions adjusted annually. The life insurance plan is non-contributory.


69
THE HERSHEY COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except share data or if otherwise indicated)

Obligations and Funded Status
A summary of the changes in benefit obligations, plan assets and funded status of these plans is as follows:
  Pension Benefits  Other Benefits 
December 31, 2014 2013 2014 2013
Change in benefit obligation        
Projected benefits obligation at beginning of year $1,120,492
 $1,237,778
 $270,937
 $318,415
Service cost 26,935
 31,339
 706
 1,094
Interest cost 48,886
 43,962
 11,696
 10,747
Plan amendments 168
 55
 —
 —
Actuarial (gain) loss 134,902
 (100,872) 35,688
 (33,412)
Curtailment —
 (8,833) —
 —
Settlement —
 (319) —
 —
Currency translation and other (6,204) (5,976) (1,264) (1,030)
Benefits paid (64,284) (76,642) (23,699) (24,877)
Projected benefits obligation at end of year 1,260,895
 1,120,492
 294,064
 270,937
Change in plan assets        
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year 1,091,985
 988,167
 —
 —
Actual return on plan assets 85,921
 152,976
 —
 —
Employer contribution 29,409
 32,336
 23,699
 24,877
Settlement —
 (319) —
 —
Currency translation and other (6,088) (4,533) —
 —
Benefits paid (64,284) (76,642) (23,699) (24,877)
Fair value of plan assets at end of year 1,136,943
 1,091,985
 —
 —
Funded status at end of year $(123,952) $(28,507) $(294,064) $(270,937)
         
Amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets:        
Other assets $25
 $32,533
 $—
 $—
Accrued liabilities (9,054) (10,198) (25,214) (25,477)
Other long-term liabilities (114,923) (50,842) (268,850) (245,460)
Total $(123,952) $(28,507) $(294,064) $(270,937)
         
Amounts recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), net of tax:        
Actuarial net (loss) gain $(279,625) $(215,702) $(7,936) $13,107
Net prior service credit (cost) 5,341
 5,698
 (2,430) (2,737)
Net amounts recognized in AOCI $(274,284) $(210,004) $(10,366) $10,370
The accumulated benefit obligation for all defined benefit pension plans was $1,206,929 as of December 31, 2014 and $1,072,234 as of December 31, 2013.
  Pension Benefits  Other Benefits 
December 31, 2015 2014 2015 2014
Change in benefit obligation        
Projected benefits obligation at beginning of year $1,260,895
 $1,120,492
 $294,064
 $270,937
Service cost 28,300
 26,935
 542
 706
Interest cost 44,179
 48,886
 10,187
 11,696
Plan amendments 67
 168
 —
 —
Actuarial (gain) loss (51,064) 134,902
 (26,887) 35,688
Curtailment (2,693) —
 292
 —
Settlement (57,193) —
 —
 —
Divestiture (4,047) —
 —
 —
Currency translation and other (11,456) (6,204) (2,206) (1,264)
Benefits paid (37,564) (64,284) (20,375) (23,699)
Projected benefits obligation at end of year 1,169,424
 1,260,895
 255,617
 294,064
Change in plan assets        
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year 1,136,943
 1,091,985
 —
 —
Actual return on plan assets (19,804) 85,921
 —
 —
Employer contributions 32,898
 29,409
 20,375
 23,699
Settlement (57,193) —
 —
 —
Divestiture (2,485) —
 —
 —
Currency translation and other (10,893) (6,088) —
 —
Benefits paid (37,564) (64,284) (20,375) (23,699)
Fair value of plan assets at end of year 1,041,902
 1,136,943
 —
 —
Funded status at end of year $(127,522) $(123,952) $(255,617) $(294,064)
         
Amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets:        
Other assets $—
 $25
 $—
 $—
Accrued liabilities (4,841) (9,054) (24,205) (25,214)
Other long-term liabilities (122,681) (114,923) (231,412) (268,850)
Total $(127,522) $(123,952) $(255,617) $(294,064)
         
Amounts recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), net of tax:        
Actuarial net (loss) gain $(264,570) $(279,625) $7,574
 $(7,936)
Net prior service credit (cost) 4,267
 5,341
 (1,919) (2,430)
Net amounts recognized in AOCI $(260,303) $(274,284) $5,655
 $(10,366)

7078
THE HERSHEY COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except share data or if otherwise indicated)

The accumulated benefit obligation for all defined benefit pension plans was $1,129,052 as of December 31, 2015 and $1,206,929 as of December 31, 2014.
Plans with accumulated benefit obligations in excess of plan assets were as follows:  
December 31, 2014 2013 2015 2014
Projected benefit obligation $1,193,151
 $76,801
 $1,110,232
 $1,193,151
Accumulated benefit obligation 1,151,210
 64,340
 1,081,002
 1,151,210
Fair value of plan assets 1,071,539
 15,760
 985,111
 1,071,539
Net Periodic Benefit Cost
The components of net periodic benefit cost were as follows:  
  Pension Benefits Other Benefits
For the years ended December 31, 2014 2013 2012 2014 2013 2012
Amounts recognized in net periodic benefit cost            
Service cost $26,935
 $31,339
 $30,823
 $706
 $1,094
 $1,172
Interest cost 48,886
 43,962
 49,909
 11,696
 10,747
 13,258
Expected return on plan assets (74,080) (73,128) (72,949) —
 —
 —
Amortization of prior service cost (credit) (667) 422
 731
 616
 618
 619
Amortization of net loss (gain) 23,360
 40,397
 39,723
 (141) (73) (101)
Administrative expenses 786
 692
 545
 89
 75
 120
Curtailment credit —
 (364) —
 —
 —
 —
Settlement loss —
 18
 19,676
 —
 —
 —
Total net periodic benefit cost $25,220
 $43,338
 $68,458
 $12,966
 $12,461
 $15,068
             
Change in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in AOCI, pre-tax            
Actuarial net (gain) loss $99,136
 $(230,605) $8,536
 $36,021
 $(33,165) $7,952
Prior service (credit) cost 833
 (613) (716) (629) (632) (613)
Total recognized in other comprehensive (income) loss, pre-tax $99,969
 $(231,218) $7,820
 $35,392
 $(33,797) $7,339
Net amounts recognized in periodic benefit cost and AOCI $125,189
 $(187,880) $76,278
 $48,358
 $(21,336) $22,407
A portion of the pension settlement loss recorded in 2012, totaling $15,787, was associated with the Next Century program, as discussed in Note 8. The remaining settlement losses in 2012 were associated with one of our international businesses.
  Pension Benefits Other Benefits
For the years ended December 31, 2015 2014 2013 2015 2014 2013
Amounts recognized in net periodic benefit cost            
Service cost $28,300
 $26,935
 $31,339
 $542
 $706
 $1,094
Interest cost 44,179
 48,886
 43,962
 10,187
 11,696
 10,747
Expected return on plan assets (68,830) (74,080) (73,128) —
 —
 —
Amortization of prior service (credit) cost (1,178) (667) 422
 611
 616
 618
Amortization of net loss (gain) 30,510
 23,360
 40,397
 (57) (141) (73)
Curtailment credit (688) —
 (364) 204
 —
 —
Settlement loss 23,067
 —
 18
 —
 —
 —
Total net periodic benefit cost $55,360
 $24,434
 $42,646
 $11,487
 $12,877
 $12,386
             
Change in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in AOCI, pre-tax            
Actuarial net (gain) loss $(21,554) $99,136
 $(230,605) $(26,270) $36,021
 $(33,165)
Prior service (credit) cost 1,748
 833
 (613) (834) (629) (632)
Total recognized in other comprehensive (income) loss, pre-tax $(19,806) $99,969
 $(231,218) $(27,104) $35,392
 $(33,797)
Net amounts recognized in periodic benefit cost and AOCI $35,554
 $124,403
 $(188,572) $(15,617) $48,269
 $(21,411)
Amounts expected to be amortized from AOCI into net periodic benefit cost during 20152016 are as follows:  
 Pension Plans  
Post-Retirement
Benefit Plans 
Amortization of net actuarial loss$32,308
 $616
Amortization of prior service credit$(1,163) $—
 Pension Plans  
Post-Retirement
Benefit Plans 
Amortization of net actuarial loss (gain)$35,230
 $(49)
Amortization of prior service (credit) cost$(1,046) $575

7179
THE HERSHEY COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except share data or if otherwise indicated)

Assumptions
The weighted-average assumptions used in computing the benefit obligations were as follows:
 Pension Benefits  Other Benefits Pension Benefits  Other Benefits
December 31, 2014 2013 2014 2013 2015 2014 2015 2014
Discount rate 3.7% 4.5% 3.7% 4.5% 4.0% 3.7% 4.0% 3.7%
Rate of increase in compensation levels 4.0% 4.0% N/A
 N/A
 3.8% 4.0% N/A
 N/A
The weighted-average assumptions used in computing net periodic benefit cost were as follows:  
 Pension Benefits Other Benefits Pension Benefits Other Benefits
For the years ended December 31, 2014 2013 2012 2014 2013 2012 2015 2014 2013 2015 2014 2013
Discount rate 4.5% 3.7% 4.5% 4.5% 3.7% 4.5% 3.7% 4.5% 3.7% 3.7% 4.5% 3.7%
Expected long-term return on plan assets 7.0% 7.75% 8.0% N/A
 N/A
 N/A
 6.3% 7.0% 7.8% N/A
 N/A
 N/A
Rate of compensation increase 4.0% 4.0% 4.1% N/A
 N/A
 N/A
 4.1% 4.0% 4.0% N/A
 N/A
 N/A

The Company’s discount rate assumption is determined by developing a yield curve based on high quality corporate bonds with maturities matching the plans’ expected benefit payment streams. The plans’ expected cash flows are then discounted by the resulting year-by-year spot rates.

We based the asset return assumption of 6.3% for 2015, 7.0% for 2014 7.75%and 7.8% for 2013 and 8.0% for 2012 on current and expected asset allocations, as well as historical and expected returns on the plan asset categories. For 2015,2016, we reduced the expected return on plan assets assumption to 6.3%6.1% from the 7.0%6.3% assumption used during 2014,2015, reflecting lower expected futurelong-term returns on plan assets resulting from a reduction of the pension plan asset allocationdue to equity securities.slowing growth in developed and emerging markets. The historical average return over the 2728 years prior to December 31, 2014,2015, was approximately 8.7%8.3%.
For purposes of measuring our post-retirement benefit obligation at December 31, 2014,2015, we assumed a 7.8%6.5% pre-65 and a 7.3% post-65 annual rate of increase in the per capita cost of covered health care benefits for 2015,2016, grading down to 5.0% by 2019. Similarly, for measurement purposes as of December 31, 2013,2014, we assumed a 8.5%7.0% pre-65 and a 8.0% post-65 annual rate of increase in the per capita cost of covered health care benefits for 2014,2015, grading down to 5.0% by 2019. Assumed health care cost trend rates could have a significant effect on the amounts reported for the post-retirement health care plans. A one-percentage point change in assumed health care cost trend rates would have the following effects:
Impact of assumed health care cost trend rates One-Percentage
Point Increase 		 One-Percentage
Point (Decrease)		 One-Percentage
Point Increase 		 One-Percentage
Point Decrease
Effect on total service and interest cost components $164
 $(149) $139
 $(122)
Effect on post-retirement benefit obligation 4,567
 (4,051)
Effect on accumulated post-retirement benefit obligation 3,539
 (3,144)
The valuations and assumptions reflect adoption of the Society of Actuaries updated RP-2014 mortality tables with MP-2014MP-2015 generational projection scales, which we adopted as of December 31, 2014.2015. Adoption of the updated tablesscale did not have a significant impact on our current pension obligations or net period benefit cost since our primary plans are cash balance plans and most participants take lump-sum settlements upon retirement.
Plan Assets
We broadly diversify our pension plan assets across domestic and international common stockequities and fixed income asset classes. Our asset investment policies specify ranges oftarget asset allocation percentages for each asset class. The ranges for our major domestic pension plans wereas of December 31, 2015 was as follows:
Asset Class Target Allocation 2014
Equity securities 40%-60%
Debt securities 40%-60%
Cash and certain other investments 0%-5%
Asset ClassTarget Asset Allocation 
Equity securities50%
Debt securities49%
Cash1%

7280
THE HERSHEY COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except share data or if otherwise indicated)

As of December 31, 2014,2015, actual allocations were consistent with the targets and within the specifiedour allowable ranges. We expect the level of volatility in pension plan asset returns to be in line with the overall volatility of the markets within each asset class.
The following table sets forth by level, within the fair value hierarchy (as defined in Note 5), pension plan assets at their fair values as of December 31, 2014:2015:
Quoted prices in active markets of identical assets
(Level 1)		 Significant other observable inputs
(Level 2)		 Significant other unobservable
inputs (Level 3)		 TotalQuoted prices in active markets of identical assets
(Level 1)		 Significant other observable inputs
(Level 2)		 Significant other unobservable
inputs (Level 3)		 Total
Cash and cash equivalents$2,123
 $47,702
 $—
 $49,825
$1,763
 $30,389
 $—
 $32,152
Equity securities:              
U.S. all-cap (a)1,034
 140,948
 —
 141,982
—
 138,367
 —
 138,367
U.S. large-cap (b)91,363
 —
 —
 91,363
U.S. small/mid-cap37,797
 —
 —
 37,797
International all-cap (c)121,901
 3,510
 —
 125,411
108,862
 3,118
 —
 111,980
Global all-cap (d)165,131
 —
 —
 165,131
73,157
 196,063
 —
 269,220
Fixed income securities:              
U.S. government/agency138,556
 42,787
 —
 181,343
117,378
 120,136
 —
 237,514
Corporate bonds (e)144,289
 41,248
 —
 185,537
101,476
 37,748
 —
 139,224
Collateralized obligations (f)33,753
 24,305
 —
 58,058
32,532
 8,157
 —
 40,689
International government/ corporate bonds (g)53,205
 47,291
 —
 100,496
31,917
 40,839
 —
 72,756
Total assets at fair value$789,152
 $347,791
 $—
 $1,136,943
$467,085
 $574,817
 $—
 $1,041,902
The following table sets forth by level, within the fair value hierarchy, pension plan assets at their fair values as of December 31, 2013:2014:
Quoted prices in active markets of identical assets 
(Level 1)
 Significant other observable inputs(Level 2) 
Significant other unobservable 
inputs (Level 3)
 Total
Quoted prices in active markets of identical assets 
(Level 1)
 Significant other observable inputs(Level 2) 
Significant other unobservable 
inputs (Level 3)
 Total
Cash and cash equivalents$657
 $22,998
 $—
 $23,655
$2,123
 $47,702
 $—
 $49,825
Equity securities:              
U.S. all-cap (a)64,949
 137,385
 —
 202,334
1,034
 140,948
 —
 141,982
U.S. large-cap (b)144,254
 —
 —
 144,254
91,363
 —
 —
 91,363
U.S. small/mid-cap33,145
 —
 —
 33,145
37,797
 —
 —
 37,797
International all-cap (c)136,892
 3,062
 —
 139,954
121,901
 3,510
 —
 125,411
Global all-cap (d)181,702
 —
 —
 181,702
165,131
 —
 —
 165,131
Fixed income securities:              
U.S. government/agency109,995
 34,907
 —
 144,902
138,556
 42,787
 —
 181,343
Corporate bonds (e)57,735
 34,616
 —
 92,351
144,289
 41,248
 —
 185,537
Collateralized obligations (f)56,016
 22,350
 —
 78,366
33,753
 24,305
 —
 58,058
International government/corporate bonds (g)14,018
 37,304
 —
 51,322
53,205
 47,291
 —
 100,496
Total assets at fair value$799,363
 $292,622
 $—
 $1,091,985
$789,152
 $347,791
 $—
 $1,136,943


7381
THE HERSHEY COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except share data or if otherwise indicated)

(a)This category comprises equity funds that track the Russell 3000 index.
(b)This category comprises equity funds that track the S&P 500 and/or Russell 1000 indices.
(c)This category comprises equity funds that track the MSCI World Ex-US index.
(d)This category comprises equity funds that track the MSCI World index.index and/or MSCI All Country World Index.
(e)This category comprises fixed income funds primarily invested in investment grade bonds.
(f)This category comprises fixed income funds primarily invested in high quality mortgage-backed securities and other asset-backed obligations.
(g)This category comprises fixed income funds invested in Canadian and other international bonds.
The fair value of the Level 1 assets was based on quoted prices in active markets for the identical assets. The fair value of the Level 2 assets was determined by management based on an assessment of valuations provided by asset management entities and was calculated by aggregating market prices for all underlying securities.
Investment objectives for our domestic plan assets are:
lTo ensure high correlation between the value of plan assets and liabilities;
lTo maintain careful control of the risk level within each asset class; and
lTo focus on a long-term return objective.
We believe that there are no significant concentrations of risk within our plan assets as of December 31, 2014.2015. We comply with the rules and regulations promulgated under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”) and we prohibit investments and investment strategies not allowed by ERISA. We do not permit direct purchases of our Company’s securities or the use of derivatives for the purpose of speculation. We invest the assets of non-domestic plans in compliance with laws and regulations applicable to those plans.
Cash Flows
Our policy is to fund domestic pension liabilities in accordance with the limits imposed by the ERISA, federal income tax laws and the funding requirements of the Pension Protection Act of 2006. We fund non-domestic pension liabilities in accordance with laws and regulations applicable to those plans.
We made total contributions to the pension plans of $29,409$32,898 during 2014,2015, including contributions of $22,000$22,900 to improvemaintain the funded status of our domestic plans. In 2013,2014, we made total contributions of $32,336$29,409 to the pension plans. For 2015,2016, minimum funding requirements for our pension plans are approximately $1,088$800 and we expect to make additional contributions of approximately $23,600$18,500 to improvemaintain the funded status of our domestic plans.
Total benefit payments expected to be paid to plan participants, including pension benefits funded from the plans and other benefits funded from Company assets, are as follows:
Expected Benefit Payments 
Expected Benefit Payments 
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020-20242016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021-2025
Pension Benefits$71,685
 $69,918
 $103,081
 $81,715
 $88,847
 $545,365
$178,748
 $93,577
 $72,676
 $76,944
 $82,176
 $447,262
Other Benefits25,247
 24,344
 22,933
 21,364
 19,954
 83,846
24,233
 22,478
 20,574
 18,979
 17,790
 76,248
The pension benefit payments expected for 2016 include additional lump sum withdrawals related to the 2015 Productivity Initiative (see Note 8).
Multiemployer Pension Plan
With the acquisition of Brookside Foods Ltd. in January 2012, we began participation in the Bakery and ConfectioneryBCTGM Union and Industry Canadian Pension Fund,Plan, a trustee-managed multiemployer defined benefit pension plan. We currently have approximately 160140 employees participating in the plan and contributions were not significant in 2015, 2014 2013 or 2012.2013. Our obligation during the term of the collective bargaining agreement is limited to remitting the required contributions to the plan.

7482
THE HERSHEY COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except share data or if otherwise indicated)

Savings Plans
The Company sponsors several defined contribution plans to provide retirement benefits to employees. Contributions to The Hershey Company 401(k) Plan and similar plans for non-domestic employees are based on a portion of eligible pay up to a defined maximum. All matching contributions were made in cash. Expense associated with the defined contribution plans was $44,285 in 2015, $46,064 in 2014 and $43,257 in 2013 and $39,759 in 2012.2013.
10. STOCK COMPENSATION PLANS
Share-based grants for compensation and incentive purposes are made pursuant to the Equity and Incentive Compensation Plan (“EICP”). The EICP provides for grants of one or more of the following stock-based compensation awards to employees, non-employee directors and certain service providers upon whom the successful conduct of our business is dependent:
lNon-qualified stock options (“stock options”);
lPerformance stock units (“PSUs”) and performance stock;
lStock appreciation rights;
lRestricted stock units (“RSUs”) and restricted stock; and
lOther stock-based awards.
As of December 31, 2014,2015, 68.5 million shares were authorized and approved by our stockholders for grants under the EICP. The EICP also provides for the deferral of stock-based compensation awards by participants if approved by the Compensation and Executive Organization Committee of our Board and if in accordance with an applicable deferred compensation plan of the Company. Currently, the Compensation and Executive Organization Committee has authorized the deferral of PSU and RSU awards by certain eligible employees under the Company’s Deferred Compensation Plan. Our Board has authorized our non-employee directors to defer any portion of their cash retainer, committee chair fees and RSUs awarded after 2007 that they elect to convert into deferred stock units under our Directors’ Compensation Plan.
The following table summarizes ourFor the periods presented, compensation costs: expense for all types of stock-based compensation programs and the related income tax benefit recognized were as follows:
For the years ended December 31, 2014 2013 2012
Total compensation amount charged against income for stock compensation plans, including stock options, PSUs and RSUs $54,068
 $53,984
 $50,482
Total income tax benefit recognized in Consolidated Statements of Income for share-based compensation 18,653
 18,517
 17,517
For the years ended December 31, 2015 2014 2013
Pre-tax compensation expense $51,533
 $54,068
 $53,984
Related income tax benefit 17,109
 18,653
 18,517
Compensation costs for stock compensation plans are primarily included in selling, marketing and administrative expense. As of December 31, 2015, total stock-based compensation cost related to non-vested awards not yet recognized was $54,526 and the weighted-average period over which this amount is expected to be recognized was approximately 2.2 years.
Stock Options
The exercise price of each stock option awarded under the EICP equals the closing price of our Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the date of grant. Each stock option has a maximum term of 10 years. Grants of stock options provide for pro-rated vesting, typically over a four year period. We recognize expenseExpense for stock options is based on the straight-line method as of the grant date fair value.
The following table summarizes our compensation costs for stock options:
For the years ended December 31, 2014 2013 2012
Compensation amount charged against income for stock options $25,074
 $21,390
 $19,272
value and recognized on a straight-line method over the vesting period.

7583
THE HERSHEY COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except share data or if otherwise indicated)

A summary of the statusactivity relating to grants of our Company’s stock options and changes duringfor the last three yearsyear ended December 31, 2015 is as follows:
 2014 2013 2012
Stock Options Shares Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price		 Shares Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price		 Shares Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price		SharesWeighted-Average
Exercise Price (per share)		Weighted-Average Remaining
Contractual Term		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at beginning of year 8,660,336
 $55.47
 10,553,914
 $48.08
 14,540,442
 $44.86
Outstanding at beginning of the period7,319,377
$66.696.3 years 
Granted 1,387,580
 $105.75
 1,779,109
 $81.95
 2,110,945
 $60.89
1,355,575
$105.18  
Exercised (2,537,581) $48.61
 (3,315,990) $45.25
 (5,870,607) $44.55
(1,449,054)$52.78  
Forfeited (190,958) $82.80
 (356,697) $64.38
 (226,866) $52.02
(383,335)$99.20  
Outstanding at end of year 7,319,377
 $66.69
 8,660,336
 $55.47
 10,553,914
 $48.08
Options exercisable at year-end 3,673,726
 $51.01
 4,290,416
 $46.45
 5,320,775
 $45.74
Weighted-average fair value of options granted during the year (per share) $21.50   $14.51   $10.60  
Outstanding as of December 31, 20156,842,563
$75.485.8 years$128,710
Options exercisable as of December 31, 20154,284,014
$63.214.3 years$118,232
We useThe weighted-average fair value of options granted was $18.99, $21.50 and $14.51 per share in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The fair value was estimated on the thedate of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model to determineand the fair value of stock options granted to employees. The following table sets forth the weighted-average assumptions used for such grants during the year:assumptions:
For the years ended December 31, 2014 2013 2012 2015 2014 2013
Dividend yields 2.0% 2.2% 2.4% 2.1% 2.0% 2.2%
Expected volatility 22.3% 22.2% 22.4% 20.7% 22.3% 22.2%
Risk-free interest rates 2.1% 1.4% 1.5% 1.9% 2.1% 1.4%
Expected lives in years 6.7
 6.6
 6.6
 6.7
 6.7
 6.6
l“Dividend yields” means the sum of dividends declared for the four most recent quarterly periods, divided by the average price of our Common Stock for the comparable periods;
l“Expected volatility” means the historical volatility of our Common Stock over the expected term of each grant;
l“Risk-free interest rates” means the U.S. Treasury yield curve rate in effect at the time of grant for periods within the contractual life of the stock option; and
l“Expected lives” means the period of time that stock options granted are expected to be outstanding based primarily on historical data.
The following table summarizes thetotal intrinsic value of our stock options:
For the years ended December 31, 2014 2013 2012
Intrinsic value of options exercised $133,948 $135,396 $130,219
The aggregate intrinsic value of stock options outstanding as of December 31,exercised was $66,161, $133,948 and $135,396 in 2015, 2014 was $258,809. The aggregate intrinsic value of exercisable stock options as of December 31, 2014 was $184,477.and 2013, respectively.
As of December 31, 2014,2015, there was $22,193$19,008 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock option compensation arrangements granted under the EICP, which we expect to recognize over a weighted-average period of 2.4 years.

7684
THE HERSHEY COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except share data or if otherwise indicated)

The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding as of December 31, 2014:2015:  
  Options Outstanding Options Exercisable
Range of Exercise Prices Number
Outstanding as
of 12/31/14		 Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life in Years 		 Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price  		 Number
Exercisable as of
12/31/14		 Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price 
$33.40 - $51.42 2,484,189
 4.6 $42.84 2,092,239
 $41.23
$51.65 - $72.44 2,031,766
 5.5 $59.25 1,211,277
 $58.21
$81.73 - $106.65 2,803,422
 8.4 $93.22 370,210
 $82.69
$33.40 - $106.65 7,319,377
 6.3 $66.69 3,673,726
 $51.01
  Options Outstanding Options Exercisable
Range of Exercise Prices Number
Outstanding as
of 12/31/15		 Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life in Years 		 Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price  		 Number
Exercisable as of
12/31/15		 Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price 
$33.40 - $56.33 1,998,058
 3.2 $44.52 1,998,058
 $44.52
$60.68 - $81.73 2,420,944
 5.8 $71.38 1,658,197
 $69.89
$86.75 - $106.65 2,423,561
 7.9 $105.09 627,759
 $105.09
$33.40 - $106.65 6,842,563
 5.8 $75.48 4,284,014
 $63.21
Performance Stock Units and Restricted Stock Units
Under the EICP, we grant PSUs to selected executives and other key employees. Vesting is contingent upon the achievement of certain performance objectives. We grant PSUs over 3-year performance cycles. If we meet targets for financial measures at the end of the applicable 3-year performance cycle, we award a resulting number of shares of our Common Stock to the participants. For each PSU granted from 20122013 through 2014,2015, 50% of the target award was comprised of a market-based total shareholder return component and 50% of the target award was comprised of performance-based components. The performance scores for 20122013 through 20142015 grants of PSUs can range from 0% to 250% of the targeted amounts.
We recognize the compensation cost associated with PSUs ratably over the 3-year term. Compensation cost is based on the grant date fair value because the grants can only be settled in shares of our Common Stock. The grant date fair value of PSUs is determined based on the Monte Carlo simulation model for the market-based total shareholder return component and the closing market price of the Company’s Common Stock on the date of grant for performance-based components.
In 2015, 2014 2013 and 2012,2013, we awarded RSUs to certain executive officers and other key employees under the EICP. We also awarded RSUs quarterly to non-employee directors.
We recognize the compensation cost associated with employee RSUs over a specified restriction period based on the grant date fair value or year-end market value of our Common Stock. We recognize expense for employee RSUs based on the straight-line method. We recognize the compensation cost associated with non-employee director RSUs ratably over the vesting period.
A summary of activity relating to grants of PSUs and RSUs for the period ended December 31, 2015 is as follows:
For the years ended December 31, 2014 2013 2012
Compensation amount charged against income for PSUs and RSUs $28,994
 $32,594
 $31,210
Performance Stock Units and Restricted Stock Units Number of units 
Weighted-average grant date fair value
for equity awards or market value for
liability awards (per unit)
Outstanding at beginning of year 904,306
 $94.48
Granted 381,407
 $104.68
Performance assumption change (281,902) $107.39
Vested (452,118) $75.40
Forfeited (56,486) $111.39
Outstanding at end of year 495,207
 $106.40
The table above excludes PSU awards for 20,586 units as of December 31, 2015 and 25,462 units as of December 31, 2014 for which the measurement date has not yet occurred for accounting purposes.
The following table sets forth information about the fair value of the PSUs and RSUs granted for potential future distribution to employees and non-employee directors. In addition, the table provides assumptions used to determine the fair value of the market-based total shareholder return component using the Monte Carlo simulation model on the date of grant.
For the years ended December 31, 2014 2013 2012
Units granted 331,788
 395,862
 503,761
Weighted-average fair value at date of grant $115.57
 $88.49
 $64.99
Monte Carlo simulation assumptions:      
Estimated values $80.95
 $55.49
 $35.62
Dividend yields 1.8% 2.0% 2.5%
Expected volatility 15.5% 17.1% 20.0%

7785
THE HERSHEY COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except share data or if otherwise indicated)

For the years ended December 31, 2015 2014 2013
Units granted 381,407
 331,788
 395,862
Weighted-average fair value at date of grant $104.68
 $115.57
 $88.49
Monte Carlo simulation assumptions:      
Estimated values $61.22
 $80.95
 $55.49
Dividend yields 2.0% 1.8% 2.0%
Expected volatility 14.9% 15.5% 17.1%
l“Estimated values” means the fair value for the market-based total shareholder return component of each PSU at the date of grant using a Monte Carlo simulation model;
l“Dividend yields” means the sum of dividends declared for the four most recent quarterly periods, divided by the average price of our Common Stock for the comparable periods;
l“Expected volatility” means the historical volatility of our Common Stock over the expected term of each grant.
A summaryThe intrinsic value of share-based liabilities paid, combined with the statusfair value of our Company’s PSUsshares vested, totaled $46,113, $57,360 and RSUs as of December 31,$62,582 in 2015, 2014 and the change during 2014 follows:2013, respectively.
Performance Stock Units and Restricted Stock Units 2014 
Weighted-average grant date fair value
for equity awards or market value for
liability awards
Outstanding at beginning of year 1,411,399
 $72.43
Granted 331,788
 $115.57
Performance assumption change (214,145) $91.85
Vested (565,520) $63.93
Forfeited (59,216) $95.86
Outstanding at end of year 904,306
 $94.48
The table above excludes PSU awards for 25,462Deferred PSUs, deferred RSUs and deferred stock units representing directors’ fees totaled 505,992 units as of December 31, 2014 and 29,596 units as2015. Each unit is equivalent to one share of December 31, 2013 for which the measurement date has not yet occurred for accounting purposes.
As of December 31, 2014, there was $37,341 of unrecognized compensation cost relating to non-vested PSUs and RSUs. We expect to recognize that cost over a weighted-average period of 2.0 years.
For the years ended December 31, 2014 2013 2012
Intrinsic value of share-based liabilities paid, combined with the fair value of shares vested $57,360
 $62,582
 37,329
Deferred PSUs, deferred RSUs, deferred directors’ fees and accumulated dividend amounts totaled 524,195 units as of December 31, 2014.Company’s Common Stock.
11. SEGMENT INFORMATION
We operate under a matrix reportingOur organizational structure is designed to ensure continued focus on North America, coupled with an emphasis on accelerating growth in our focus international markets, as we transform into a more global company. Our business is organized around geographic regions, and strategic business units. It is designed to enablewhich enables us to build processes for repeatable success in our global markets. The Presidents of our geographic regions, along with the Senior Vice President responsible for our Global Retail and Licensing business, are accountable for delivering our annual financial plans and report into our CEO, who serves as our Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”), so we have defined our operating segments on a geographic basis. Our North America business currently generates over 85%87% of our consolidated revenue and none of our other geographic regions are individually significant, sosignificant. Therefore, we have historically presented our business as one reportable segment. However, given the recent growth in our international business, combined with the September 2014 acquisition of Shanghai Golden Monkey, we have elected to begin reporting our operations within two segments, North America and International and Other, to provide additional transparency into our operations outside of North America. We have definedcurrently define our reportable segments as follows:
North America - This segment is responsible for our traditional chocolate and sugarnon-chocolate confectionery market position, as well as our grocery and growing snacks market positions, in the United States and Canada. This includes developing and growing our business in chocolate sugarand non-chocolate confectionery, refreshment, pantry, and food service and other snacking product lines.


78
THE HERSHEY COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except share data or if otherwise indicated)

International and Other - This segment includes all other countries where The Hershey Company currently manufactures, imports, markets, sells or distributes chocolate sugarand non-chocolate confectionery and other products. Currently, this includes our operations in Mexico, BrazilChina and Puerto Rico, as well asother Asia markets, Latin America, Europe, Africa and the Middle East, and Asia, primarily China, India, Korea, Japan and the Philippines; along with exports to these regions. While a minorless significant component, this segment also includes our global retail operations, including Hershey's Chocolate World stores in Hershey, Pennsylvania, New York City, Chicago, Las Vegas, Shanghai, Niagara Falls (Ontario), Dubai, and Singapore, as well as operations associated with licensing the use of certain of the Company's trademarks and products to third parties around the world.
For segment reporting purposes, we use “segment income” to evaluate segment performance and allocate resources. Segment income excludes unallocated general corporate administrative expenses, as well as business realignment and impairment charges, acquisition-related costs, the non-service related portion of pension expense and other unusual gains or losses that are not part of our measurement of segment performance. These items of our operating income are managed centrally at the corporate level and are excluded from the measure of segment income reviewed by the CODM.
Accounting policies associated with our operating segments are generally the same as those described in Note 1.

86
THE HERSHEY COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except share data or if otherwise indicated)

Certain manufacturing, warehousing, distribution and other activities supporting our global operations are integrated to maximize efficiency and productivity. As a result, assets and capital expenditures are not managed on a segment basis and are not included in the information reported to the CODM for the purpose of evaluating performance or allocating resources. We disclose depreciation and amortization that is generated by segment-specific assets, since these amounts are included within the measure of segment income reported to the CODM.
Our segment net sales and earnings were as follows:
For the years ended December 31,For the years ended December 31, 2014 2013 2012For the years ended December 31, 2015 2014 2013
Net sales:Net sales:      Net sales:      
North AmericaNorth America $6,352,729
 $6,200,118
 $5,812,639
North America $6,468,158
 $6,352,729
 $6,200,118
International and OtherInternational and Other 1,069,039
 945,961
 831,613
International and Other 918,468
 1,069,039
 945,961
TotalTotal $7,421,768
 $7,146,079
 $6,644,252
Total $7,386,626
 $7,421,768
 $7,146,079
             
Segment income:Segment income:      Segment income:      
North AmericaNorth America $1,916,207
 $1,862,636
 $1,656,136
North America $2,073,967
 $1,916,207
 $1,862,636
International and OtherInternational and Other 40,004
 44,587
 51,370
International and Other (98,067) 40,004
 44,587
Total segment incomeTotal segment income 1,956,211
 1,907,223
 1,707,506
Total segment income 1,975,900
 1,956,211
 1,907,223
Unallocated corporate expense (1)Unallocated corporate expense (1) 503,407
 533,506
 478,645
Unallocated corporate expense (1) 497,386
 503,234
 535,130
Business realignment and impairment charges 50,190
 19,085
 83,767
Non-service related pension (1,834) 10,885
 20,572
Acquisition integration costs 14,873
 4,072
 13,374
Income before interest and income taxes 1,389,575
 1,339,675
 1,111,148
Goodwill and other intangible asset impairmentGoodwill and other intangible asset impairment 280,802
 15,900
 —
Charges associated with business realignment activitiesCharges associated with business realignment activities 120,975
 34,290
 19,085
Non-service related pension expense (income)Non-service related pension expense (income) 18,079
 (1,834) 10,885
Acquisition and integration costsAcquisition and integration costs 20,899
 12,360
 4,072
Operating profitOperating profit 1,037,759
 1,392,261
 1,338,051
Interest expense, netInterest expense, net 83,532
 88,356
 95,569
Interest expense, net 105,773
 83,532
 88,356
Other (income) expense, netOther (income) expense, net 30,139
 2,686
 (1,624)
Income before income taxesIncome before income taxes $1,306,043
 $1,251,319
 $1,015,579
Income before income taxes $901,847
 $1,306,043
 $1,251,319
(1)Includes centrally-managed (a) corporate functional costs relating to legal, treasury, finance, and human resources, (b) expenses associated with the oversight and administration of our global operations, including warehousing, distribution and manufacturing, information systems and global shared services, (c) non-cash stock-based compensation expense, and (d) other gains or losses that are not integral to segment performance.


7987
THE HERSHEY COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except share data or if otherwise indicated)

Depreciation and amortization expense included within segment income presented above is as follows:
For the years ended December 31,For the years ended December 31,2014 2013 2012For the years ended December 31,2015 2014 2013
North AmericaNorth America$146,475
 $143,640
 $154,348
North America$153,185
 $146,475
 $143,640
International and OtherInternational and Other28,463
 23,461
 21,707
International and Other46,342
 28,463
 23,461
CorporateCorporate36,594
 33,932
 33,982
Corporate45,401
 36,594
 33,932
TotalTotal$211,532
 $201,033
 $210,037
Total$244,928
 $211,532
 $201,033
Additional geographic information is as follows:
2014 2013 2012 2015 2014 2013
Net sales:Net sales:     Net sales:     
United StatesUnited States$5,996,564
 $5,832,070
 $5,449,877
United States$6,116,490
 $5,996,564
 $5,832,070
OtherOther1,425,204
 1,314,009
 1,194,375
Other1,270,136
 1,425,204
 1,314,009
TotalTotal$7,421,768
 $7,146,079
 $6,644,252
Total$7,386,626
 $7,421,768
 $7,146,079
           
Long-lived assets:Long-lived assets:     Long-lived assets:     
United StatesUnited States$1,477,455
 $1,474,155
 $1,420,548
United States$1,528,723
 $1,477,455
 $1,474,155
OtherOther674,446
 331,190
 253,523
Other711,737
 674,446
 331,190
TotalTotal$2,151,901
 $1,805,345
 $1,674,071
Total$2,240,460
 $2,151,901
 $1,805,345
12. EQUITY AND NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS
We had 1,055,000,000 authorized shares of capital stock as of December 31, 2014.2015. Of this total, 900,000,000 shares were designated as Common Stock, 150,000,000 shares were designated as Class B Stock and 5,000,000 shares were designated as Preferred Stock. Each class has a par value of one dollar per share.
Changes in the outstanding shares of Common Stock for the past three years were as follows:
For the years ended December 31, 2014 2013 2012 2015 2014 2013
Shares issued 359,901,744
 359,901,744
 359,901,744
 359,901,744
 359,901,744
 359,901,744
Treasury shares at beginning of year (136,007,023) (136,115,714) (134,695,826) (138,856,786) (136,007,023) (136,115,714)
Stock repurchases:            
Repurchase programs (2,135,268) —
 (2,054,354) (4,209,112) (2,135,268) —
Stock-based compensation programs (3,676,513) (3,655,830) (5,598,537) (1,776,838) (3,676,513) (3,655,830)
Stock issuances:            
Stock-based compensation programs 2,962,018
 3,764,521
 6,233,003
 1,718,352
 2,962,018
 3,764,521
Treasury shares at end of year (138,856,786) (136,007,023) (136,115,714) (143,124,384) (138,856,786) (136,007,023)
Net shares outstanding at end of year 221,044,958
 223,894,721
 223,786,030
 216,777,360
 221,044,958
 223,894,721
Holders of the Common Stock and the Class B Stock generally vote together without regard to class on matters submitted to stockholders, including the election of directors. The holders of Common Stock have 1 vote per share and the holders of Class B Stock have 10 votes per share. However, the Common Stock holders, voting separately as a class, are entitled to elect one-sixth of the Board. With respect to dividend rights, the Common Stock holders are entitled to cash dividends 10% higher than those declared and paid on the Class B Stock.
Class B Stock can be converted into Common Stock on a share-for-share basis at any time. During 2014, 4402015, no shares of Class B Stock were converted into Common Stock. During 2013, 8,6002014, 440 shares were converted and during 2012, 3,2252013, 8,600 shares were converted.

8088
THE HERSHEY COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except share data or if otherwise indicated)

Hershey Trust Company
Hershey Trust Company, as trustee for the benefit of Milton Hershey School and as direct owner of investment shares, held 12,902,82112,902,921 shares of our Common Stock as of December 31, 2014.2015. As trustee for the benefit of Milton Hershey School, Hershey Trust Company held 60,612,012 shares of the Class B Stock as of December 31, 2014,2015, and was entitled to cast approximately 80% of all of the votes entitled to be cast on matters requiring the vote of both classes of our common stock voting together. Hershey Trust Company, as trustee for the benefit of Milton Hershey School, or any successor trustee, or Milton Hershey School, as appropriate, must approve any issuance of shares of Common Stock or other action that would result in it not continuing to have voting control of our Company.

Noncontrolling Interests in Subsidiaries
Noncontrolling interestsWe currently own a 50% controlling interest in subsidiaries totaled $64,468 asLotte Shanghai Food Company (“LSFC”), a joint venture established in 2007 in China for the purpose of manufacturing and selling product to the venture partners.
At December 31, 2014, and $11,218 as of December 31, 2013, with the increase primarily reflecting the 50% noncontrolling interest resulting from our March 2014 acquisition of LSFC, as discussed in Note 2.
We also ownwe owned a 51% controlling interest in Hershey do Brasil under a cooperative agreement with Pandurata Netherlands B.V. (“Bauducco”), a leading manufacturer of baked goods in Brazil whose primary brand is Bauducco. DuringAt the end of 2014, and 2013,per the Company contributed cashterms of $3,060the prevailing quotaholder’s agreement, Bauducco provided notice of its intent to sell its 49% interest to us at an amount equal to fair value.
Because the noncontrolling interest held by Bauducco was redeemable as a result of the put right, the balance sheet presentation of the noncontrolling interest during 2015 was revised to be reflected as a redeemable noncontrolling interest. The balance was increased in the first three quarters of 2015 by a total of $33,915, in order to reflect the balance at its redemption value based on the internal valuation for the business. The offset of this adjustment was recorded to additional paid in capital. We purchased the remaining 49% interest in Hershey do Brasil and Bauducco contributed $2,940 in each of these time periods.September.
The share of losses pertainingA roll-forward showing the 2015 activity relating to the noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries was $227 and $1,682 for the years ended December 31, 2014redeemable noncontrolling interest follows:
 Noncontrolling Interests Redeemable Noncontrolling Interest
Balance, December 31, 2014$64,468
 $—
Reclassification from Total Equity to Redeemable Noncontrolling Interest(13,428) 13,428
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests (1)577
 (4,393)
Other comprehensive loss - foreign currency translation adjustments(2,152) (2,334)
Adjustment to redemption value—
 33,915
Other—
 (2,346)
Purchase of redeemable noncontrolling interest—
 (38,270)
Balance, December 31, 2015$49,465
 $—
(1) Amounts are not considered significant and December 31, 2013, respectively. These amounts are reflected inpresented within selling, marketing and administrative expenses.
13. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
We enter into certain obligations for the purchase of raw materials. These obligations are primarily in the form of forward contracts for the purchase of raw materials from third-party brokers and dealers. These contracts minimize the effect of future price fluctuations by fixing the price of part or all of these purchase obligations. Total obligations consisted of fixed price contracts for the purchase of commodities and unpriced contracts that were valued using market prices as of December 31, 2014.2015.
The cost of commodities associated with the unpriced contracts is variable as market prices change over future periods. We mitigate the variability of these costs to the extent that we have entered into commodities futures contracts or other commodity derivative instruments to hedge our costs for those periods. Increases or decreases in market prices are offset by gains or losses on commodities futures contracts or other commodity derivative instruments. Taking delivery of and making payments for the specific commodities for use in the manufacture of finished goods satisfies

89
THE HERSHEY COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except share data or if otherwise indicated)

our obligations under the forward purchase contracts. For each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2014,2015, we satisfied these obligations by taking delivery of and making payment for the specific commodities.
As of December 31, 2014,2015, we had entered into purchase agreements with various suppliers. Subject to meeting our quality standards, the purchase obligations covered by these agreements were as follows as of December 31, 2014:2015:
In millions of dollars20152016201720182016201720182019
Purchase obligations$1,298.8
$618.1
$138.6
$66.8
$1,343.1
$880.0
$87.9
$22.4
We have commitments under various lease obligations. Future minimum payments under lease obligations with a remaining term in excess of one year were as follows as of December 31, 2014:2015:
In millions of dollars20152016201720182019Thereafter20162017201820192020Thereafter
Future minimum rental payments$28.2
$13.4
$9.6
$3.2
$0.9
$0.9
$12.6
$9.6
$3.7
$1.2
$0.4
$0.7
Future minimum rental payments reflect commitments under non-cancelable operating leases primarily for offices, retail stores, warehouse and distribution facilities, and certain equipment.

81
THE HERSHEY COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except share data or if otherwise indicated)

In December 2013, we entered into an agreement Total rent expense for the construction of a new confectionery manufacturing plant in Malaysia. We incurred approximately $115 million in capital expenditures for construction of the plant inyears ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and expect to incur costs of $90 million to $110 million in 2015. The total cost of construction is expected to be approximately $265 million to $275 million. The plant is expected to begin operations in the second half of 2015.2013 was $19,754, $21,423 and $16,972, respectively, including short-term rentals.
We have a number of facilities that contain varying amounts of asbestos in certain locations within the facilities. Our asbestos management program is compliant with current applicable regulations, which require that we handle or dispose of asbestos in a special manner if such facilities undergo major renovations or are demolished. Costs associated with the removal of asbestos related to the closure of a manufacturing facility under the Next Century program were recorded primarily in 2012 and included in business realignment and impairment charges. The costs associated with the removal of asbestos from the facility were not material. With regard to other facilities, we do not have sufficient information to estimate the fair value of any asset retirement obligations related to these facilities. We cannot specify the settlement date or range of potential settlement dates and, therefore, sufficient information is not available to apply an expected present value technique. We expect to maintain the facilities with repairs and maintenance activities that would not involve or require the removal of significant quantities of asbestos.
Legal contingencies
In 2007, the Competition Bureau of Canada began an inquiry into alleged violations of the Canadian Competition Act in the sale and supply of chocolate products sold in Canada between 2002 and 2008 by members of the confectionery industry, including Hershey Canada, Inc. The U.S. Department of Justice also notified the Company in 2007 that it had opened an inquiry, but has not requested any information or documents.
Subsequently, 13 civil lawsuits were filed in Canada and 91 civil lawsuits were filed in the United States against
the Company. The lawsuits were instituted on behalf of direct purchasers of our products as well as indirect purchasers that purchase our products for use or for resale. Several other chocolate and confectionery companies were named as defendants in these lawsuits as they also were the subject of investigations and/or inquiries by the government entities referenced above. The cases seeksought recovery for losses suffered as a result of alleged conspiracies in restraint of trade in connection with the pricing practices of the defendants.
The Canadian civil cases were settled in 2012. Hershey Canada, Inc. reached a settlement agreement with the Competition Bureau of Canada through their Leniency Program with regard to an inquiry into alleged violations of the Canadian Competition Act in the sale and supply of chocolate products sold in Canada by members of the confectionery industry. On June 21, 2013, Hershey Canada, Inc. pleaded guilty to one count of price fixing related to communications with competitors in Canada in 2007 and paid a fine of approximately $4.0 million. Hershey Canada, Inc. had promptly reported the conduct to the Competition Bureau, cooperated fully with its investigation and did not implement the planned price increase that was the subject of the 2007 communications.
With regard to the U.S. lawsuits, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation assigned the cases to the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania.Pennsylvania (the “District Court”). Plaintiffs are seekingsought actual and treble damages against the Company and other defendants based on an alleged overcharge for certain, or in some cases all, chocolate products sold in the U.S. between December 2002 and December 2007, and certain plaintiff groups have alleged damages

90
THE HERSHEY COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except share data or if otherwise indicated)

that extendextended beyond the alleged conspiracy period. The lawsuits havehad been proceeding on different scheduling tracks for different groups of plaintiffs.
On February 26, 2014, the District Court granted summary judgment to the Company in the cases brought by the direct purchaser plaintiffs that had not sought class certification as well as those that had been certified as a class. The direct purchaser plaintiffs appealed the District Court's decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit (“Third Circuit”) in May 2014. The appeal remains pending beforeOn September 15, 2015, the Third Circuit.Circuit affirmed the District Court's summary judgment decision.
The remaining plaintiff groups - the putative class plaintiffs that purchased product indirectly for resale, the putative class plaintiffs that purchased product indirectly for use, and direct purchaser Associated Wholesale Grocers, Inc. - dismissed their cases with prejudice, subject to reinstatement if the Third Circuit were to reverse the District Court'sCourt’s summary judgment decision. The District Court entered judgment closing the case on April 17, 2014.
We currently have no material pending legal proceedings, other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to our
business.

8291
THE HERSHEY COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except share data or if otherwise indicated)

Competition and antitrust law investigations can be lengthy and violations are subject to civil and/or criminal fines and other sanctions. Class action civil antitrust lawsuits are expensive to defend and could result in significant judgments, including in some cases, payment of treble damages and/or attorneys' fees to the successful plaintiff. Additionally, negative publicity involving these proceedings could affect our Company's brands and reputation, possibly resulting in decreased demand for our products. These possible consequences, in our opinion, are currently not expected to materially impact our financial position or liquidity, but could materially impact our results of operations and cash flows in the period in which any fines, settlements or judgments are accrued or paid, respectively.
We have no other material pending legal proceedings, other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to our business.
14. EARNINGS PER SHARE
We compute basic earnings per share for Common Stock and Class B common stock using the two-class method. The Class B common stock is convertible into Common Stock on a share-for-share basis at any time. The computation of diluted earnings per share for Common Stock assumes the conversion of Class B common stock using the if-converted method, while the diluted earnings per share of Class B common stock does not assume the conversion of those shares.
We compute basic and diluted earnings per share based on the weighted-average number of shares of Common Stock and Class B Stockcommon stock outstanding as follows:
For the years ended December 31, 2014 2013 2012
Net income $846,912
 $820,470
 $660,931
Weighted-average shares—basic:      
Common stock 161,935
 163,549
 164,406
Class B common stock 60,620
 60,627
 60,630
Total weighted-average shares—basic 222,555
 224,176
 225,036
Effect of dilutive securities:      
Employee stock options 1,920
 2,476
 2,608
Performance and restricted stock units 362
 551
 693
Weighted-average shares—diluted 224,837
 227,203
 228,337
Earnings per share—basic:      
Common stock $3.91 $3.76 $3.01
Class B common stock $3.54 $3.39 $2.73
Earnings Per Share—diluted:      
Common stock $3.77 $3.61 $2.89
Class B common stock $3.52 $3.37 $2.71
For the years ended December 31, 2015 2014 2013
  Common Stock Class B Common Stock Common Stock Class B Common Stock Common Stock Class B Common Stock
Basic earnings per share:            
Numerator:            
Allocation of distributed earnings (cash dividends paid) $352,953
 $123,179
 $328,752
 $111,662
 $294,979
 $98,822
Allocation of undistributed earnings 27,324
 9,495
 303,801
 102,697
 319,883
 106,786
Total earnings—basic $380,277
 $132,674
 $632,553
 $214,359
 $614,862
 $205,608
             
Denominator (shares in thousands):            
Total weighted-average shares—basic 158,471
 60,620
 161,935
 60,620
 163,549
 60,627
             
Earnings Per Share—basic $2.40
 $2.19
 $3.91
 $3.54
 $3.76
 $3.39
             
Diluted earnings per share:            
Numerator:            
Allocation of total earnings used in basic computation $380,277
 $132,674
 $632,553
 $214,359
 $614,862
 $205,608
Reallocation of total earnings as a result of conversion of Class B common stock to Common stock 132,674
 —
 214,359
 —
 205,608
 —
Reallocation of undistributed earnings —
 (69) —
 (1,071) —
 (1,461)
Total earnings—diluted $512,951
 $132,605
 $846,912
 $213,288
 $820,470
 $204,147
             
Denominator (shares in thousands):            
Number of shares used in basic computation 158,471
 60,620
 161,935
 60,620
 163,549
 60,627
Weighted-average effect of dilutive securities:            
Conversion of Class B common stock to Common shares outstanding 60,620
 —
 60,620
 —
 60,627
 —
Employee stock options 1,335
 —
 1,920
 —
 2,476
 —
Performance and restricted stock options 225
 —
 362
 —
 551
 —
Total weighted-average shares—diluted 220,651
 60,620
 224,837
 60,620
 227,203
 60,627
             
Earnings Per Share—diluted $2.32
 $2.19
 $3.77
 $3.52
 $3.61
 $3.37
The Class B Stock is convertible into Common Stock on a share for share basis at any time. The calculation of earnings per share-dilutedshare calculations for the Class B Stock was performed using the two-class methodyears ended December 31, 2015, December 31, 2014 and the calculation of earnings per share-diluted for the Common Stock was performed using the if-converted method.
For the years ended December 31, 2014 2013 2012
Stock options excluded from diluted earnings per share calculations because the effect would have been antidilutive 1,510
 1,757
 3,543


December 31, 2013 excluded 2,660, 1,510 and 1,757 stock options, respectively, that would have been antidilutive.

8392
THE HERSHEY COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except share data or if otherwise indicated)

15. SUPPLEMENTAL BALANCE SHEET INFORMATION
The components of certain Consolidated Balance Sheet accounts are as follows:
December 31, 2014 2013 2015 2014
Inventories:        
Raw materials $377,620
 $226,978
 $353,451
 $377,620
Goods in process 63,916
 79,861
 67,745
 63,916
Finished goods 531,608
 517,968
 534,983
 531,608
Inventories at FIFO 973,144
 824,807
 956,179
 973,144
Adjustment to LIFO (172,108) (165,266) (205,209) (172,108)
Total inventories $801,036
 $659,541
 $750,970
 $801,036
        
Property, plant and equipment:        
Land $95,913
 $96,334
 $96,666
 $95,913
Buildings 1,031,050
 882,508
 1,084,958
 1,031,050
Machinery and equipment 2,863,559
 2,527,420
 2,886,723
 2,863,559
Construction in progress 338,085
 273,132
 448,956
 338,085
Property, plant and equipment, gross 4,328,607
 3,779,394
 4,517,303
 4,328,607
Accumulated depreciation (2,176,706) (1,974,049) (2,276,843) (2,176,706)
Property, plant and equipment, net $2,151,901
 $1,805,345
 $2,240,460
 $2,151,901
        
Other assets:        
Pension $25
 $32,804
 $—
 $25
Capitalized software, net 63,252
 56,502
 68,004
 63,252
Income tax receivable 1,568
 63,863
 1,428
 1,568
Other non-current assets 77,927
 139,835
 85,934
 71,281
Total other assets $142,772
 $293,004
 $155,366
 $136,126
        
Accrued liabilities:        
Payroll, compensation and benefits $225,439
 $245,641
 $215,638
 $225,439
Advertising and promotion 326,647
 348,966
 337,945
 326,647
Due to SGM shareholders 98,884
 —
 72,025
 98,884
Other 162,543
 105,115
 231,359
 162,543
Total accrued liabilities $813,513
 $699,722
 $856,967
 $813,513
        
Other long-term liabilities:        
Post-retirement benefits liabilities $268,850
 $245,460
 $231,412
 $268,850
Pension benefits liabilities 114,923
 50,842
 122,681
 114,923
Other 142,230
 137,766
 114,625
 142,230
Total other long-term liabilities $526,003
 $434,068
 $468,718
 $526,003



8493
THE HERSHEY COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(amounts in thousands, except share data or if otherwise indicated)

16. QUARTERLY DATA (Unaudited)
Summary quarterly results were as follows:
Year 2014 First Second Third  Fourth
Year 2015 First Second 
Third(b)
 
Fourth(b)
Net sales $1,871,813
 $1,578,350
 $1,961,578
 $2,010,027
 $1,937,800
 $1,578,825
 $1,960,779
 $1,909,222
Gross profit 871,490
 717,474
 860,137
 887,065
 900,843
 735,408
 868,706
 877,718
Net income 252,495
 168,168
 223,741
 202,508
Net income (loss) 244,737
 (99,941) 140,266
 227,889
Common stock:                
Net income per share—Basic 1.16
 0.78
 1.03
 0.94
Net income per share—Diluted 1.11
 0.75
 1.00
 0.91
Net income (loss) per share—Basic(a)
 1.14
 (0.47) 0.66
 1.08
Net income (loss) per share—Diluted 1.10
 (0.47) 0.64
 1.04
Dividends paid per share 0.485
 0.485
 0.535
 0.535
 0.535
 0.535
 0.583
 0.583
Class B common stock:                
Net income per share—Basic 1.04
 0.70
 0.94
 0.85
Net income per share—Diluted(a)
 1.03
 0.70
 0.94
 0.85
Net income (loss) per share—Basic(a)
 1.04
 (0.42) 0.60
 0.98
Net income (loss) per share—Diluted(a)
 1.03
 (0.42) 0.60
 0.98
Dividends paid per share 0.435
 0.435
 0.486
 0.486
 0.486
 0.486
 0.530
 0.530
Market price—common stock:                
High 108.07
 104.11
 96.93
 106.64
 110.78
 101.74
 94.31
 97.07
Low 95.54
 96.02
 88.15
 91.09
 98.52
 87.86
 85.13
 83.58
Year 2013 First Second Third Fourth
Year 2014 First Second Third Fourth
Net sales $1,827,426
 $1,508,514
 $1,853,886
 $1,956,253
 $1,871,813
 $1,578,350
 $1,961,578
 $2,010,027
Gross profit 849,337
 718,574
 855,551
 857,386
 871,490
 717,474
 860,137
 887,065
Net income 241,906
 159,504
 232,985
 186,075
 252,495
 168,168
 223,741
 202,508
Common stock:                
Net income per share—Basic(a)
 1.11
 0.73
 1.07
 0.85
 1.16
 0.78
 1.03
 0.94
Net income per share—Diluted 1.06
 0.70
 1.03
 0.82
 1.11
 0.75
 1.00
 0.91
Dividends paid per share 0.42
 0.42
 0.485
 0.485
 0.485
 0.485
 0.535
 0.535
Class B common stock:                
Net income per share—Basic 1.00
 0.66
 0.96
 0.77
 1.04
 0.70
 0.94
 0.85
Net income per share—Diluted 0.99
 0.66
 0.95
 0.76
 1.03
 0.70
 0.94
 0.85
Dividends paid per share 0.38
 0.38
 0.435
 0.435
 0.435
 0.435
 0.486
 0.486
Market price—common stock:                
High 87.53
 91.25
 97.69
 100.90
 108.07
 104.11
 96.93
 106.64
Low 73.51
 85.25
 89.17
 91.04
 95.54
 96.02
 88.15
 91.09
(a)
Quarterly income per share amounts do not total to the annual amount due to changes in weighted-average shares outstanding during the year.year, as well as the impact of excluding dilutive securities in the period in which there was a net loss.
(b)The Company identified a material weakness in its internal control over financial reporting related to hedge accounting compliance for cocoa commodity derivatives. As a result, hedge accounting treatment for cocoa commodity derivatives was disallowed for the third and fourth quarters of 2015; therefore the impact of changes in fair value of the cocoa commodity futures outstanding during these periods should have been recorded within cost of sales as incurred, instead of deferred within AOCI. Such gains (losses) totaled $(23,358) for the third quarter of 2015 and an essentially offsetting amount for the fourth quarter of 2015. The amounts presented above for the third and fourth quarters of 2015 reflect the impact of reclassifying these gains (losses) deferred within AOCI to cost of sales for the respective periods.


8594


Item 9.
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.

Item 9A.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a)Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As required by Rule 13a-15 underWe have established disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), the Company conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2014. This evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Interim Principal Financial Officer. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Interim Principal Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are) designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Company’sour reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controlsforms, and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure thatsuch information required to be disclosed in the Company’s reports filed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Company’sour Chief Executive Officer and Interim PrincipalChief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Management's report Management, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2015. Based on the Company'sthis evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2015, solely due to a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting appears on the following page. There has been no change during the most recent fiscal quarterrelated to hedge accounting compliance for cocoa commodity derivatives as described in the Company’s internal controlManagement Report on Internal Control over financial reporting identified in connection with its evaluationFinancial Reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.follows.

86


MANAGEMENT REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
(b)Management Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
The management of The Hershey Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f). The Company’s internal control system wasis designed to provide reasonable assurance to the Company’s management and Board of Directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements.
All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.
The Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Interim Principal Financial Officer, assessedTo assess the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, as of December 31, 2014. In making this assessment, the Company’s management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control–Integrated Framework (2013 edition). Based on this assessment,Commission’s 2013 Framework. Because of the deficiency described below, management concluded that, as of December 31, 2014,2015, there was a material weakness in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting wasand, therefore, the Company did not maintain effective based on those criteria.
Management’s assessment of, and conclusion on, the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015.
Management has identified a material weakness in its internal control over financial reporting that existed as of December 31, 2015, solely related to its accounting for cocoa derivative financial instruments pursuant to the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging (ASC 815). This material weakness arose in the quarter ended October 4, 2015, and was the result of changes the Company made in the third quarter of fiscal 2015 to its hedging program and related controls. Specifically, the control designed to monitor compliance with the Company’s hedge documentation did not includeoperate as designed during the internal controlsthird and fourth quarters of Shanghai Golden Monkey Food Joint Stock Co., Ltd.,fiscal 2015. As a company acquired         September 26, 2014result, instances of non-compliance with our hedging program related to cocoa derivatives occurred and includedwere not detected timely and, therefore, we did not meet the technical requirements to qualify for cash flow hedge accounting treatment under ASC 815.
This material weakness resulted in an immaterial error in cost of goods sold and accumulated other comprehensive income in the Company’s 2014financial statements as of and for the quarter ended October 4, 2015. For details of the quarterly impact, please refer to Note 16, Quarterly Data. In light of this material weakness, prior to filing this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we completed additional procedures and analysis designed to ensure the reliability of our financial reporting. Based on such procedures and analysis, we concluded that the consolidated financial statements.  This entity’s net salesstatements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly present, in all material respects, our financial position, results of operations and assets excluded from management's assessmentcash flows for the periods presented in conformity with U.S. GAAP.

95


The Company's independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP, has audited the effectiveness of the Company's internal control represented 0.7% and 4.7%over financial reporting as of the Company’s total net sales and total assets, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2014.2015, which report is included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

/s/ JOHN P. BILBREY(c)Remediation Plan for Material Weaknesses in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
The Company previously announced its intention, effective January 1, 2016, to no longer designate its existing or future purchases of commodity derivatives, including cocoa derivatives, as cash flow hedges and will not elect to qualify for hedge accounting treatment. As a result, the controls associated with monitoring compliance with ASC 815 to qualify for hedge accounting are no longer relevant for our commodity hedges; therefore, there is no need for remediation of the material weakness.
/s/ RICHARD M. MCCONVILLE
John P. Bilbrey
Chief Executive Officer
(d)
Richard M. McConville
Interim PrincipalChanges in Internal Control Over Financial Officer
Reporting
Except for the matters noted in (c) above, there were no other changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the fourth quarter of 2015 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.




8796


Item 9B.
OTHER INFORMATION
None.

8897


PART III
Item 10.
DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The information regarding executive officers of the Company required by Item 401 of SEC Regulation S-K is incorporated herein by reference from the disclosure included under the caption “SUPPLEMENTAL ITEM. EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT” at the end of Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The information required by Item 401 of SEC Regulation S-K concerning the directors and nominees for director of the Company, together with a discussion of the specific experience, qualifications, attributes and skills that led the Board to conclude that the director or nominee should serve as a director at this time, will be located in the Proxy Statement in the section entitled “PROPOSAL NO. 1 – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS,” which information is incorporated herein by reference.
Information regarding the identification of the Audit Committee as a separately-designated standing committee of the Board and information regarding the status of one or more members of the Audit Committee as an “audit committee financial expert” will be located in the Proxy Statement in the section entitled “MEETINGS AND COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD – Committees of the Board,” which information is incorporated herein by reference.
Reporting of any inadvertent late filings under Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, will be located in the Proxy Statement in the section entitled “SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE,” which information is incorporated herein by reference.
Information regarding our Code of Ethical Business Conduct applicable to our directors, officers and employees is located in Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, under the heading “Available Information.”
Item 11.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Information regarding the compensation of each of our named executive officers, including our Chief Executive Officer, will be located in the Proxy Statement in the section entitled “COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS,” which information is incorporated herein by reference. Information regarding the compensation of our directors will be located in the Proxy Statement in the section entitled “NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION,” which information is incorporated herein by reference.
The information required by Item 407(e)(4) of SEC Regulation S-K will be located in the Proxy Statement in the section entitled “COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION,” which information is incorporated herein by reference.
The information required by Item 407(e)(5) of SEC Regulation S-K will be located in the Proxy Statement in the section entitled “Compensation Committee Report,” which information is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 12.
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Information concerning ownership of our voting securities by certain beneficial owners, individual nominees for director, the named executive officers, including persons serving as our Chief Executive Officer and Interim PrincipalChief Financial Officer, and directors and executive officers as a group, will be located in the Proxy Statement in the section entitled “SHARE OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS, MANAGEMENT AND CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS,” which information is incorporated herein by reference.
Information regarding all of the Company’s equity compensation plans will be located in the Proxy Statement in the section entitled “EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION,” which information is incorporated herein by reference.




8998


The following table provides information about all of the Company's equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2014:
Equity Compensation Plan Information
Plan Category 
(a)
Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights
 
(b)
Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights
 
(c)
Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(1)
       
Stock Options 7,319,377
 $66.69
   
Performance Stock Units and Restricted Stock Units 904,306
 N/A
   
Subtotal 8,223,683
    14,824,348
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders       
Stock Options N/A    N/A
Total 8,223,683
 $66.69
(2) 
 14,824,348
(1)
Column (a) includes stock options, performance stock units and restricted stock units granted under the stockholder-approved Equity and Incentive Compensation Plan (“EICP”). Of the securities available for future issuances under the EICP in column (c), 8,733,087 were available for awards of stock options and 6,091,261 were available for full-value awards such as performance stock units, performance stock, restricted stock units, restricted stock and other stock-based awards. Securities available for future issuance of full-value awards may also be used for stock option awards. As of December 31, 2014, 25,462 performance stock units were excluded from the number of securities remaining available for issuance in column (c) because the measurement date had not yet occurred for accounting purposes. For more information, seeNote 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(2)Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding stock options only.
Item 13.CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
Information regarding transactions with related persons will be located in the Proxy Statement in the section entitled “CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS AND RELATIONSHIPS,” which information is incorporated herein by reference. Information regarding director independence will be located in the Proxy Statement in the section entitled “CORPORATE GOVERNANCE – Director Independence,” which information is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 14.
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
Information regarding “Principal Accounting Fees and Services,” including the policy regarding pre-approval of audit and non-audit services performed by our Company’s independent auditors, will be located in the Proxy Statement in the section entitled “INFORMATION ABOUT OUR INDEPENDENT AUDITORS,” which information is incorporated herein by reference.

9099


PART IV
Item 15.
EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
Item 15(a)(1): Financial Statements
The audited consolidated financial statements of The Hershey Company and its subsidiaries and the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm thereon, as required to be filed, are located under Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 15(a)(2): Financial Statement Schedule
Schedule II—Valuation and Qualifying Accounts (see page 93)102) for The Hershey Company and its subsidiaries for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 2013 and 20122013 is filed as required by Item 15(c).
We omitted other schedules because they are not applicable or the required information is set forth in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.
Item 15(a)(3): Exhibits
The information called for by this Item is incorporated by reference from the Exhibit Index included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, beginning on page 94.10-K.



91100


SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, this 20th26th day of February, 2015.2016.
  THE HERSHEY COMPANY
  (Registrant)
   
By: /S/ RICHARD M. MCCONVILLEPATRICIA A. LITTLE
  Richard M. McConvillePatricia A. Little
  Interim PrincipalChief Financial Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Company and in the capacities and on the date indicated.
Signature Title Date 
     
/S/ JOHN P. BILBREY  Chief Executive Officer and Director February 20, 201526, 2016
(John P. Bilbrey) (Principal Executive Officer)  
     
/S/ RICHARD M. MCCONVILLEPATRICIA A. LITTLEChief Financial OfficerFebruary 26, 2016
(Patricia A. Little)(Principal Financial Officer)
/S/ JAVIER H. IDROVO Chief Accounting Officer and Interim Principal Financial Officer February 20, 201526, 2016
(Richard M. McConville)Javier H. Idrovo) (Principal Accounting Officer)  
     
/S/ PAMELA M. ARWAY Director February 20, 201526, 2016
(Pamela M. Arway)    
     
/S/ ROBERT F. CAVANAUGH  Director February 20, 201526, 2016
(Robert F. Cavanaugh)    
     
/S/ CHARLES A. DAVIS  Director February 20, 201526, 2016
(Charles A. Davis)    
     
/S/ MARY KAY HABEN Director February 20, 201526, 2016
(Mary Kay Haben)    
     
/S/ ROBERT M. MALCOLM Director February 20, 201526, 2016
(Robert M. Malcolm)    
     
/S/ JAMES M. MEAD Director February 20, 201526, 2016
(James M. Mead)    
     
/S/ JAMES E. NEVELS Director February 20, 201526, 2016
(James E. Nevels)    
     
/S/ ANTHONY J. PALMER Director February 20, 201526, 2016
(Anthony J. Palmer)    
     
/S/ THOMAS J. RIDGE Director February 20, 201526, 2016
(Thomas J. Ridge)    
     
/S/ DAVID L. SHEDLARZ Director February 20, 201526, 2016
(David L. Shedlarz)    

92101


 
Schedule II
THE HERSHEY COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE II—VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2015, 2014 2013 and 20122013
 
    Additions    
Description 
Balance at
Beginning
of Period 
 
Charged to
Costs and
Expenses 
 Charged
to Other Accounts 		 Deductions
from
Reserves 		 
Balance
at End
of Period 
In thousands of dollars         
          
Year Ended December 31, 2014:
Reserves deducted in the consolidated balance sheet from the assets to which they apply (a)
          
Accounts Receivable—Trade, Net $14,329
 $153,652
 $—
 $(152,096) $15,885
           
Year Ended December 31, 2013:
Reserves deducted in the consolidated balance sheet from the assets to which they apply (a)
          
Accounts Receivable—Trade, Net $15,246
 $154,874
 $—
 $(155,791) $14,329
           
Year Ended December 31, 2012:
Reserves deducted in the consolidated balance sheet from the assets to which they apply (a)
          
Accounts Receivable—Trade, Net $19,453
 $135,443
 $—
 $(139,650) $15,246
    Additions    
Description 
Balance at
Beginning
of Period 
 
Charged to
Costs and
Expenses 
 Charged
to Other Accounts 		 Deductions
from
Reserves 		 
Balance
at End
of Period 
In thousands of dollars          
           
For the year ended December 31, 2015          
Allowances deducted from assets          
Accounts receivable—trade, net (a) $15,885
 $172,622
 $—
 $(155,869) $32,638
Valuation allowance on net deferred taxes (b) 147,223
 59,832
 —
 —
 207,055
Inventory obsolescence reserve (c) 11,748
 32,434
 —
 (21,550) 22,632
Total allowances deducted from assets $174,856
 $264,888
 $—
 $(177,419) $262,325
           
For the year ended December 31, 2014          
Allowances deducted from assets          
Accounts receivable—trade, net (a) $14,329
 $153,652
 $—
 $(152,096) $15,885
Valuation allowance on net deferred taxes (b) 87,159
 60,064
 —
 —
 147,223
Inventory obsolescence reserve (c) 564
 24,660
 —
 (13,476) 11,748
Total allowances deducted from assets $102,052
 $238,376
 $—
 $(165,572) $174,856
           
For the year ended December 31, 2013          
Allowances deducted from assets          
Accounts receivable—trade, net (a) $15,246
 $154,874
 $—
 $(155,791) $14,329
Valuation allowance on net deferred taxes (b) 74,021
 13,138
 —
 —
 87,159
Inventory obsolescence reserve (c) 9,264
 17,446
 —
 (26,146) 564
Total allowances deducted from assets $98,531
 $185,458
 $—
 $(181,937) $102,052

(a) Includes allowances for doubtful accounts, anticipated discounts and anticipated discounts.write-offs of uncollectible accounts receivable.
(b) Includes adjustments to the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets that we do not expect to realize.
(c) Includes adjustments to the inventory reserve, disposals and write-offs of obsolete inventory.


 



93102



EXHIBIT INDEX
   
Exhibit NumberDescription
2.1Share Purchase Agreement by and among Shanghai Golden Monkey Food Joint Stock Co., LTD.Ltd., various shareholders thereof and Hershey Netherlands B.V., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, as of December 18, 2013, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013.
3.1The Company’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, is incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 3, 2005.
3.2The Company's By-laws, as amended and restated as of February 21, 2012,April 1, 2015, are incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 24, 2012.April 2, 2015.
4.1The Company has issued certain long-term debt instruments, no one class of which creates indebtedness exceeding 10% of the total assets of the Company and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. These classes consist of the following:
 1) 4.850% Notes due 2015
2)1) 5.450% Notes due 2016
 3)2) 1.500% Notes due 2016
 3) 1.600% Notes due 2018
 4) 4.125% Notes due 2020
 
 5) 8.8% Debentures due 2021
 
 6) 2.625% Notes due 2023
 7) 3.200% Notes due 2025
 7)8) 7.2% Debentures due 2027
 9) Other Obligations
 8) Other Obligations
 The Company undertakes to furnish copies of the agreements governing these debt instruments to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon its request.
10.110.1(a)Kit Kat and Rolo License Agreement (the “License Agreement”) between the Company and Rowntree Mackintosh Confectionery Limited is incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10(a) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1980. The
10.1(b)Amendment to the License Agreement was amended in 1988 and the Amendment Agreement is incorporated by reference from Exhibit 19 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 3, 1988. The
10.1(c)Assignment of the License Agreement was assigned by Rowntree Mackintosh Confectionery Limited to Société des Produits Nestlé SA as of January 1, 1990. The Assignment Agreement1990 is incorporated by reference from Exhibit 19 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1990.
10.2Peter Paul/York Domestic Trademark & Technology License Agreement between the Company and Cadbury Schweppes Inc. (now Kraft Foods Ireland Intellectual Property Limited) dated August 25, 1988, is incorporated by reference from Exhibit 2(a) to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 8, 1988. This agreement was assigned by the Company to its wholly-owned subsidiary, Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery Corporation.
10.3Cadbury Trademark & Technology License Agreement between the Company and Cadbury Limited (now Cadbury UK Limited) dated August 25, 1988, is incorporated by reference from Exhibit 2(a) to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 8, 1988. This agreement was assigned by the Company to its wholly-owned subsidiary, Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery Corporation.

94


10.4(a)
10.4Trademark and Technology License Agreement between Huhtamäki and the Company dated December 30, 1996, is incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 26, 1997. This agreement was assigned by the Company to its wholly-owned subsidiary, Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery Corporation. The agreement was amended and restated in 1999 and the
10.4(b)Amended and Restated Trademark and Technology License Agreement between Huhtamäki and the Company is incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999.

103


10.5
10.5(a)Five Year Credit Agreement dated as of October 14, 2011, among the Company and the banks, financial institutions and other institutional lenders listed on the respective signature pages thereof (“Lenders”), Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent for the Lenders, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as syndication agent, Citibank, N.A. and PNC Bank, National Association, as documentation agents, and Bank of America Merrill Lynch, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. and PNC Capital Markets LLC, as joint lead arrangers and joint book managers, is incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's currentCurrent Report on Form 8-K filed October 20, 2011.
10.610.5(b)Amendment No. 1 to Credit Agreement dated as of November 12, 2013, among the Company, the banks, financial institutions and other institutional lenders who are parties to the Five Year Credit Agreement and Bank of America, N.A., as agent, is incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013.
10.710.6(a)Master Innovation and Supply Agreement between the Company and Barry Callebaut, AG, dated July 13, 2007, is incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 19, 2007.
10.810.6(b)First Amendment to Master Innovation and Supply Agreement between the Company and Barry Callebaut, AG, dated April 14, 2011, is incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 3, 2011.
10.910.7Supply Agreement for Monterrey, Mexico, between the Company and Barry Callebaut, AG, dated July 13, 2007, is incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 19, 2007.
10.1010.8
The Company’s Equity and Incentive Compensation Plan, amended and restated February 22, 2011, and approved by our stockholders on April 28, 2011, is incorporated by reference from Appendix B to the Company’s proxy statement filed March 15, 2011.+
10.9 
Form of Notice of Award of Restricted Stock Units.*+
10.10
Form of Notice of Special Award of Restricted Stock Units is incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 16, 2011.+
10.11
Terms and Conditions of Nonqualified Stock Option Awards under the Equity and Incentive Compensation Plan is incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 24, 2012.+
10.12
Form of Notice of Award of Performance Stock Units is incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 24, 2012.+
10.13
The Company’s Executive Benefits Protection Plan (Group 3A), Amended and Restated as of June 27, 2012,Long-Term Incentive Program Participation Agreement is incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s QuarterlyCompany's Current Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 1, 2012.8-K filed February 18, 2005.+
10.1310.14
The Company’s Deferred Compensation Plan, Amended and Restated as of June 27, 2012, is incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 1, 2012.+
10.14
Executive Confidentiality and Restrictive Covenant Agreement, adopted as of February 16, 2009, is incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.+
10.15(a)		 
10.15
Employee Confidentiality and Restrictive Covenant Agreement, amended as of February 18, 2013, is incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013.+
10.16
The Company’s Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, Amended and Restated as of October  2, 2007, is incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007.+

95


10.15(b)
10.17
First Amendment to the Company’s Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, Amended and Restated as of October 2, 2007, is incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.+
10.1810.16
The Company’s Compensation Limit Replacement Plan, Amended and Restated as of January 1, 2009, is incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.+
10.17 
10.19
The Company’s Directors’ CompensationExecutive Benefits Protection Plan (Group 3A), Amended and Restated as of December 2, 2008,June 27, 2012, is incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.810.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 1, 2012.+
10.18
The Company's Executive Benefits Protection Plan (Group 3), Amended and Restated as of June 27, 2012.*+

104


10.19
Executive Confidentiality and Restrictive Covenant Agreement, adopted as of February 16, 2009, is incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.
+
10.20
FormEmployee Confidentiality and Restrictive Covenant Agreement, amended as of Notice of Special Award of Restricted Stock UnitsFebruary 18, 2013, is incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.210.1 to the Company’s CurrentCompany's Quarterly Report on Form 8-K filed June 16, 2011.10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013.+
10.2110.21(a)
Executive Employment Agreement with John P. Bilbrey, dated as of August 7, 2012, is incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 1, 2012.+
10.2210.21(b)
FormFirst Amendment to Executive Employment Agreement, dated as of Notice of Award of Performance Stock UnitsNovember 16, 2015, by and between the Company and John P. Bilbrey is incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 24, 2012.November 19, 2015.+
10.22 
10.23
The Long-Term Incentive Program Participation AgreementCompany’s Directors’ Compensation Plan, Amended and Restated as of December 2, 2008, is incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 18, 2005.+
10.24
The Company’s Broad Based Stock Option Plan, as amended, is incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.410.8 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002.+
2008.
12.1Computation of ratio of earnings to fixed charges statement.*
21.1Subsidiaries of the Registrant.*
23.1Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.*
31.1Certification of John P. Bilbrey, Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
31.2Certification of Richard M. McConville, Interim PrincipalPatricia A. Little, Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
32.1Certification of John P. Bilbrey, Chief Executive Officer, and Richard M. McConville, Interim PrincipalPatricia A. Little, Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.**
101.INSXBRL Instance Document
101.SCHXBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
101.CALXBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
101.LABXBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase
101.PREXBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase
101.DEFXBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase
   
*Filed herewith
**Furnished herewith
+Management contract, compensatory plan or arrangement




96105