UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON,Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

X

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007

/X/ ANNUALOR

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM ____ TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934______

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005______________

or

/ / TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934Mechanical Technology, Incorporated

For the transition period from __________ to __________

Commission file number 0-6890

MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

______________

New York

0-6890

14-1462255

(State or other jurisdiction Other Jurisdiction

of incorporation or organization)Incorporation)

(I.R.S.Commission File Number)

(IRS Employer

Identification No.)

431 New Karner Road, Albany, New York

12205

(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip Code)

Registrant's

431 New Karner Road, Albany, New York 12205

(Address of registrant’s principal executive office)

(518) 533-2200

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (518) 533-2200code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: NONE

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12 (g) of the Act:

$.01 Par Value Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class

Name of each exchange on which registered

Common Stock

The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC

(Title$0.01 par value)

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of class)the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.       Yes                                                                                                      No X

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.   Yes                                                                                                     No   X

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.                                                                                                        Yes   X   No  

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (Section 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.         

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (check one):

Large Accelerated Filer          Accelerated Filer          Non-Accelerated Filer           Smaller reporting company X

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12B-2 of the Act).                             Yes                                                                                                    No   X

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes¨ Nox

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

Yes¨ Nox

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yesx No¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (Section 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of "accelerated filer and large accelerated filer" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer¨ Accelerated filerx Non-accelerated filer¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12B-2 of the Act). Yes¨ Nox

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates as of June 30, 20052007 (based on the last sale price of $3.56$1.26 per share for such stock reported by NASDAQ for that date) was approximately $101,988,058.$43,748,142. Such value excludes common stock held by executive officers, directors, and 10% or greater stockholders as of June 30, 2007. The identification of 10% or greater stockholders as of June 30, 2007 is based upon 13G and amended 13G reports publicly filed before June 30, 2007. This calculation does not reflect a determination that such parties are affiliates for any other purposes.

As of March 9, 2006,20, 2008, the Registrant had 30, 972,32538,179,888 shares of common stock outstanding.

Documents incorporated by reference: Portions of the registrant'sregistrant’s Proxy Statement for its 20062008 Annual Meeting of ShareholdersStockholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K.


PART I

Item 1: Business

Overview

Unless the context requires otherwise in this Annual Report, the terms “we”, “us” and “our” refer to Mechanical Technology, Incorporated, ("MTI" or the "Company")a New York corporation, “MTI Micro” refers to MTI MicroFuel Cells, Inc., a Delaware corporation and our majority owned subsidiary, and “MTI Instruments” refers to MTI Instruments, Inc., a New York corporation was incorporated in 1961. MTI operates in two segments, the New Energy segment which is conducted through MTI MicroFuel Cells Inc. ("MTI Micro"), a majority-owned subsidiary, and the Test and Measurement Instrumentation segment, which is conducted through MTI Instruments, Inc. ("MTI Instruments"), aour wholly owned subsidiary. We have a registered trademark in the United States for “Mobion”. Other trademarks, trade names, and service marks used in this Annual Report are the property of their respective owners.

At its MTI Micro subsidiary, the Company is primarily focused on the development

We are developing and commercialization of advanced cord-freecommercializing off-the-grid rechargeable power pack technologysources for portable electronics. MTI Micro hasWe have developed a patented, proprietary direct methanol fuel cell ("DMFC") technology platform called Mobion,®, which generates electrical power using up to 100% methanol as fuel. MTI Micro'sOur proprietary fuel cell power solution consists of two primary components integrated in an easily manufactured device: the direct methanol fuel cell power engine, which we refer to as our Mobion® Chip, and methanol replacement cartridges. Our current Mobion Chip weighs less than one ounce and is small enough to fit in the palm of one’s hand. The methanol used by the technology is intendedfully biodegradable. We believe we are the only micro fuel cell developer to replacehave demonstrated power density of over 50 mW/cm2 with high energy efficiencies of 1.4 Wh/cc of methanol for handheld consumer electronic applications. For these reasons, we believe our technology offers a compelling alternative to current Lithium-Ionlithium-ion and similar rechargeable battery systems currently used by original equipment manufacturers (OEMs)and branded partners, or OEMs, in many hand heldhandheld electronic devices, such as personalmobile phones (including smart phones) and mobile phone accessories, digital assistants ("PDAs"), Smartphonescameras, portable media players, PDAs, and other accessories. The Company formed MTI MicroGPS devices. We believe our platform will facilitate the development of numerous product advantages, including small size, environmental friendliness, and simplicity of design, all critical for commercialization in the consumer market, and can be implemented as three different product options: a compact external charging device, a snap-on or attached power accessory, or an embedded fuel cell power solution. We have strategic arrangements with Samsung Electronics and the Duracell division of the Gillette Company. Our goal is to become a leading provider of portable power for handheld electronic devices and we intend to commercialize Mobion products beginning in 2009.

Our Mobion technology eliminates the need for active water recirculation pumps or the inclusion of water as a subsidiaryfuel dilutant. The water required for the electrochemical process is transferred internally within the Mobion Chip from the site of water generation on March 26, 2001 and currently owns approximately 90%the air-side of the outstanding common stockcell. This internal flow of MTI Micro. The remaining 10%water takes place without the need for any pumps, complicated re-circulation loops or other micro-plumbing tools. Our Mobion technology is ownedprotected by strategic partners, other investors,a patent portfolio that includes over 90 U.S. patent applications covering five key technologies and MTI Micro employeesmanufacturing areas.

We also design, manufacture, and board members. In addition, directors and employees of MTI Micro also hold options to purchase shares of MTI Micro common stock representing approximately .45% of MTI Micro's outstanding common stock on a fully diluted basis as of December 31, 2005. Such options are vested or will vest within the next four years.

At its MTI Instruments subsidiary, the Company designs, manufactures, and sellssell high-performance test and measurement instruments and systems. MTI Instruments was incorporated as a subsidiary on March 8, 2000 and hassystems serving three product groups:markets: general dimensional gaging,gauging, semiconductor, and aviation. These products consist ofof: electronic, computerized gaginggauging instruments for position, displacement and vibration applications for the design, manufacturing and test markets; semiconductor products for wafer characterization of semi-insulating and semi-conducting wafers for the semiconductor market;characterization; and engine balancing and vibration analysis systems for both military and commercial aircraft.

MTI also co-founded

The Portable Power Source Industry

Industry Background

Consumers demand portable electronics that offer an enhanced experience through expanded memory, improved display technologies, constant connectivity, robust software, and retains a minority interestreduced form factor. In addition, technological advances in Plug Power Inc. ("Plug Power") (Nasdaq: PLUG),semiconductor manufacturing, LED displays, memory costs and availability, wireless technologies, and software applications have resulted in a developerdramatic increase in the number of clean, reliable, on-site energy products.

New Energy Segment

Trendsportable electronic devices, their usage, and power requirements. As a result of these consumer demands and technological advances, there are a number of handheld electronic devices, such as mobile phones (including smart phones) and mobile phone accessories, digital cameras, portable media players, PDAs, and GPS devices, that have been introduced into the market. Many of these devices provide consumers and mobile professionals with the ability to communicate any time, anywhere and have effectively enabled the creation of an “always-on” environment independent of the end user’s location. This trend towards increased functionality in portable electronicselectronic devices has led to a “power gap” in which the disparity between a device’s power supply, typically a rechargeable lithium-ion battery, and its power need are creatingnot being met. This power gap leads to a growing need for longer-lastingthe end user to plug-in their devices to the electrical grid on a regular basis, which limits their ability to use these electronic devices where and when the need arises.

The Power Source Bottleneck

Improvements in rechargeable battery technology have not kept pace with the evolution of consumer electronic device performance. Over the last ten years, device performance as measured by silicon processor speed has increased by a factor of 128 times, while the energy density of lithium-ion technology has only doubled. We believe that further gains in lithium-ion technology for portable power. Consumers want increased intelligence and functionality for their portable devices. They want more memory, color screens, and convergence of several devices into a multi-purpose one (i.e. cell phones that are also digital cameras and MP3 players). More and more devices are being connected to some kind of network and increasingly used by consumers who want them on and leave them on. All these trends require more energy than current technologies - like battery technologies -


electronics will be incremental at best, as any achievable benefits may be ableoutweighed by the decreasing stability, availability, integrity, and relative safety of these higher energy output batteries. In addition to provide.their performance shortfalls, lithium-ion battery technology poses an environmental risk as the various heavy metals incorporated in these batteries require special disposal to prevent contamination of waste disposal sites.

MTI Micro expects

According to Frost and Sullivan, an independent research firm, the global battery market was approximately $14.3 billion in 2006 and is projected to increase to roughly $21.4 billion by 2012. The market for batteries can be divided into three segments: consumer, industrial, and military. Consumer battery sales represented approximately 81% of this market and are projected to represent an overwhelming majority of sales through at least 2012. The same study estimates that its proprietary technology should provide therechargeable batteries accounted for approximately $5.4 billion of this market in 2006.

OEMs are actively seeking improved power necessarysources to operate presentreplace existing rechargeable lithium-ion batteries and future generationsto power additional improvements to their mobile electronic devices. The development of new products using technologies that already exist, such as radio frequency technologies and 4G wireless capabilities, but cannot be effectively commercialized on mobile devices, will result from the availability of portable, electronicscompact, economical, rechargeable/replaceable higher energy density power sources, including micro fuel cells.

Our Solution

At the core of our solution is our proprietary Mobion Chip engine, a design architecture that embodies a reduction in the size, complexity, and their accessories. MTI Micro's Mobion® technology should last longer becausecost of its highfuel cell construction, which results in a reliable, manufacturable, and affordable power solution that we believe provides improved energy density and it may eliminateportability over competing rechargeable battery technologies. Our proprietary fuel cell power solution consists of two primary components integrated in an easily manufactured device: the need for a lengthy recharge because it can be instantly refueled (recharged) by inserting a new fuel refill of methanol or refueling with a canister.

Mobion® Technology: MTI Micro's Mobion® direct methanol fuel cellscell power engine, which we refer to as our Mobion Chip, and methanol replacement cartridges. Our Mobion Chip weighs less than one ounce and is small enough to fit in the palm of one’s hand. For these reasons, we believe that our Mobion platform is ideally suited to provide a replacement for rechargeable lithium-ion batteries. Based upon our ability to provide a compact, efficient, clean, safe, and long-lasting power source for lower power applications, we intend to initially target power solutions for applications, such as mobile phones (including smart phones) and mobile phone accessories, digital cameras, portable media players, PDAs, and GPS devices.

For handheld consumer electronic applications, we believe we are electrochemical devices that convert high energy density fuel (methanol) directly into electricity. The heart of a Mobion® fuel cell is a membrane between two catalyst layers. Thethe only micro fuel cell produces electrical current when thedeveloper to have demonstrated power density of over 50 mW/cm2 with energy efficiencies of 1.4 Wh/cc of fuel, is introduced to the anode catalyst layer. At the anode catalyst the fuel reacts to produce protons, electrons, and carbon dioxide. The membrane allows protons to pass through to the cathode catalyst layer. Electrons are forced to take an alternative path, and flow through current collectors providing power. At the cathode catalyst layer, the protons and electrons recombine and react with oxygen to form water.

Direct methanol fuel cells operate relatively silently, and at low temperatures and MTI Micro's Mobion® technology is being designed to reduce parts count and the need for complex components. The Mobion® technology platform can be customized to provide portable power for a number of applications depending on the power level, required run time and size requirements.

MTI Micro's Mobion® technology uses methanol as fuel. Methanol - a simple alcohol commonly used in windshield wiper fluid -is biodegradable and because itwhich is a liquid, it is easily storeddirect result of our Mobion platform’s ability to use 100% methanol – a widely available, environmentally friendly, inexpensive, and transported. In addition, methanol is inexpensive, readily available andbiodegradable fuel. These advantages result in its natural state has high energy density (about 4800 Wh/L). Methanol is increasingly seen as a fuel of choice in the industry

1

for micro fuel cells and it is being adopted by many in the industry because of its high energy density, packaging advantages, environmental and safety considerations and low cost.

Research and Development: MTI Micro is developing two DMFC technology platforms - low power and high power. Our low power platform is a simplified DMFC technology platform intended to eliminate many of the pumps and valves found in traditional DMFC systems. Low power applications are optimal for portable electronic applications such as PDAs, digital cameras and camera accessories. The high power platform may serve applications such as video cameras, laptops and power accessories for consumer and industrial electronics applications. There is also demand for improved power sources coming from both military and homeland securities markets for applications like unattended ground sensors and homeland security monitoring where the platform may be adapted with a few changes. MTI Micro's technology platform also focuses on using components and subsystems that use standard mass manufacturing practices. This technology platform is designed to permit MTI Micro to address the needs of applications with various power, duration and size requirements. DMFC development efforts are also focused on reliability, manufacturability, miniaturization and cost considerations, as well as compliance with codes and standards for DMFC systems. MTI Micro shipped its initial low volume Mobion® fuel cell systems in late 2004. The Company and MTI Micro recognize that significant technical and engineering challenges remain before DMFCs can become commercially viable or available.

During 2005, 2004 and 2003, the Company spent approximately $9.7, $13.0 and $8.3 million, respectively, on product development and research costs, including $3.6, $4.0 and, $3.8 million, respectively, on partially funded research and development.

Product Development and Manufacturing: The product specifications required to successfully penetrate MTI Micro's targeted markets vary depending on the device being powered. Weight, volume, peak power, environmental conditions, power duration and reliability are all factors that pose limiting thresholds on Mobion®fuel cell product introduction and acceptance. Therefore, MTI Micro will target products that have specifications that intersect its technology roadmap at various stages of development, thereby permitting the introduction of products earlier, while building its supply chain, manufacturing capabilities and key Original Equipment Manufacturers ("OEMs") relationships.

The Company believes that when commercialized, Mobion® could eventually have higher energy density and therefore provide multiple times the benefitsreduced size, cost, and complexity of existing Lithium-Ion batteries. When sold into the mass-commercial markets, Mobion®fuel cells should be able toour power a wireless electronic device for longer periods of time than Lithium Ion batteries without recharging/refueling,solution offering consumers portable on-demand power, independence from power outlets, and be instantly refueled withoutfreedom from the need to constantly recharge their devices.

Our Strategy

Our goal is to become a leading provider of portable power for a power outlet or a lengthy recharge.

MTI Micro has built a numberhandheld electronic devices. Key elements of system prototypes that demonstrate technology capabilities, operation in any orientation and operation at a range of voltages. MTI Micro also uses laboratory systems to demonstrate and test advanced concepts and technology. MTI Micro has demonstrated laboratory systems operating on 100% methanol and another laboratory system has achieved an energy density of 250 Watt hours per liter ("Wh/l"), which is comparable to that of a typical prismatic Lithium Ion battery. This lab system also achieved an energy density of 200 Watt hours per kilogram ("Wh/kg") on a weight basis. In addition, in lab systems MTI Micro extracted 1 Wh/cc from methanol and 1.25 Watt hours per gram ("Wh/g") on a weight basis. In addition, in 2005 MTI Micro demonstrated in the laboratory, a low power test unit that ran continuously on one integrated fuel tankour strategy designed to achieve greater than 380 Wh of energy inthis objective include the same size and shape as the BA5590 battery - one of the most used ba tteries in the military.following:

MTI Micro currently plans to use contract manufacturers to manufacture its Mobion®fuel cell products and has established contracts and relationships with key suppliers and contract manufacturers. MTI Micro also works with third-party suppliers to design, develop and manufacture subsystems and components of its Mobion®fuel cell products.

The commercialization of MTI Micro's Mobion® fuel cell products depends upon MTI Micro's ability to significantly reduce the costs of these systems and products, since they are currently substantially more expensive than systems and products based on existing technologies, such as rechargeable batteries. In addition to cost, MTI Micro continues to work on improving reliability, energy density, power density, life, and the overall performance of its Mobion® systems as well as reducing its size - critical components for successful penetration into the marketplace. We cannot assure that MTI Micro will be able to sufficiently reduce the cost of these systems and products without reducing their performance, reliability and longevity.

Although it is difficult to predict the development timetable and challenges of our Mobion®technology - a disruptive technology that may be able to provide multiple times the benefits of existing technologies, the Company expects to have units available for testing in the military markets by the end of 2006.

Business Strategy and Commercialization: The market for rechargeable batteries or power packs is large, well established and growing, experiencing sales of several hundred million units per year. MTI Micro's business strategy is to develop a robust, reliable, manufacturable, cost-effective Mobion® technology platforms suitable for the consumer markets and to first target military

2

and industrial markets. Potential military markets include extended life power sources for a number of applications including communication devices, sensors, soldier on-body power and other mission critical devices for the war on terror. Potential industrial markets include portable communications devices, wireless scanners, hand-held inventory control devices and electronic healthcare products. The potential consumer markets span a broad range of mass-market portable electronic devices such as PDAs, cell phones, global positioning systems and digital cameras. Initial applications in the consumer markets will be high value-added devices such as portable navigation systems, digital cameras, game players, camcorders and accessories for them. The Company then plans to penetrate into the even larger market for products such as cell phones and laptops.

As a result of discussions with its partners, government agencies, OEMs and others, MTI Micro has developed a commercialization strategy that consists of two overlapping phases (military/industrial and consumer) for market introduction of its Mobion®fuel cells. This tiered approach is intended to enable MTI Micro to gradually penetrate each of its selected markets.

To move the Company forward in 2006, the Company has set the following milestones for MTI Micro:

  1. Increase system efficiency by 30 percent to 1.3 Wh per cc of fuel in the second quarter;
  2. Customer demonstration of a product-intent military portable power system in the third quarter;
  3. Develop a prototype for the consumer market that exceeds the energy density of Lithium Ion batteries in the third quarter;
  4. Operationally robust units available to sell for field testing in the military market by the end of 2006;
  5. Enter into an agreement with a lead consumer OEM by the end of 2006 - a year later than originally projected.

During 2005, MTI Micro's management met important milestones, including:

  1. The development of an engineering prototype with a replaceable fuel refill for the consumer market in the second quarter;
  2. Delivery of five sensor power pack prototypes in the third quarter;
  3. Delivery of a soldier/radio power pack prototype in the third quarter;
  4. Doubled the energy density of the military's BA5590 battery in a laboratory unit during the fourth quarter;
  5. Entered into an agreement with a lead customer/partner for the development of a military product during the fourth quarter.

 

Business Focus.

Strategic Partnerships: MTI Micro intends to sell to multiple industries and enable OEMs to enhance existing product offerings. MTI Micro's strategy is to team with appropriate players in each of its targeted markets. In parallel with its product introduction strategy, MTI Micro plans to leverage joint development activities and other formal partnerships with key component and subsystems suppliers. MTI Micro also intends to rely heavily on OEMs as distribution channels for early military and industrial product introductions. MTI Micro anticipates that the nature of these relationships will vary, and as MTI Micro continues to mature and move forward with its product commercialization, such relationships will become increasingly important.

Strategic Agreements: The Gillette Company("Gillette"):On September 19, 2003, MTI Micro entered into a strategic alliance agreement with Gillette whereby MTI Micro, Gillette and Gillette's Duracell business unit agreed to jointly develop and commercialize complementary micro fuel cell products to power future mass market, high volume and portable consumer devices.

The agreement provides for a multi-year exclusive partnership for the design, development and commercialization of a low power direct methanol micro fuel cell power system and a compatible fuel refill system. The strategic alliance agreement has three main components. First, Gillette and MTI Micro shall work together from a technical and marketing perspective to help create a market for micro fuel cells. Second, for a period of time, MTI Micro will receive a percentage of net revenues related to Gillette's sale of fuel refills for micro fuel cells. Third, Gillette has made, and may make in the future equity investments in MTI Micro. On September 19, 2003, Gillette made an initial $1 million investment in MTI Micro common stock and may make additional investments of up to $4 million subject to agreed milestones related to technical and marketing progress. As part of the agreement, MTI agreed to provide enough funding to MTI Micro to co ver all operational costs for the first two years of the agreement and MTI satisfied this obligation in April 2004.

MTI Micro has not yet achieved the milestone necessary for the investment of the next $1 million in additional funds by Gillette. We do not expect this to occur, if at all, until late 2006 or 2007. Basedare focusing our efforts on the current rate of progress with Gillette, we anticipate that Gillette will not invest the remaining $3 million until the end of 2008, if at all.

As part of the strategic alliance, MTI Micro transferred patents and other intellectual property related to fuel refill systems to Gillette, and Gillette transferred patents and other intellectual property related to DMFCs for hand held devices to MTI Micro. The patents and other intellectual property transferred to Gillette and any other intellectual property related to fuel refill systems for fuel cells for handheld devices, will be held in a licensing pool, which either party may license upon payment of a royalty fee. Both MTI Micro and Gillette will share in royalties related to the license of any intellectual property from the licensing pool.

3

The strategic alliance agreement is terminable by either party for cause at any time. In addition, either party may terminate the agreement without cause after the completion of tasks and acceptance of all deliverables relating to the OEM marketing calls and concept product development milestone and the engineering product design milestone, as defined in the agreement and the work plan, as amended.

On August 18, 2004, MTI Micro entered into an amendment to the multi-year strategic alliance agreement. The amendment clarified the nature of the deliverables for the third and fourth milestones in the work plan; added an additional milestone; and changed the due dates for the third and fourth milestones. MTI Micro also granted a non-exclusive license to Gillette to any improvements made by MTI Micro to intellectual property developed by Gillette.

In May 2005, MTI Micro worked collaboratively with Gillette and completed milestone No. 3- the development of an engineering prototype with a replaceable fuel refill.

On June 20, 2005, MTI Micro entered into the second amendment to the multi-year strategic alliance agreement. The amendment added an additional milestone relating to product identification, suitability and OEM validation. The amendment also added an additional termination right, exercisable by either party, relating to such milestone.

E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company ("DuPont") : MTI Micro entered into an agreement with DuPont in August 2001 for the development and commercialization of DMFCsour portable power source products. We believe this business provides a higher potential, higher growth opportunity than our test and measurement instrumentation business. We will continue to evaluate our test and measurement instrumentation business, which contributes positive operating results and cash flows, but may consider its eventual sale or other disposition.

Design for Mass Manufacturing.Our portable electronics.power source products will be manufactured using standard processes, such as injection molding and automated test and assembly, which are broadly employed throughout the electronics manufacturing industry. In preparing Mobion for commercialization, our current Mobion Chip is injection molded and is being designed for mass manufacturing. In addition, we have continued integrating more functionality into our Mobion Chip while reducing its part count to one molded piece. Our current Mobion Chip is 9ccs in size, which is small enough to fit in the palm of a hand.

Outsource Manufacturing.We plan to outsource manufacturing to expand rapidly and diversify our production capacity. This agreement expiredstrategy will allow us to maintain a variable cost model in Julywhich we do not incur most of 2004 and was subsequently extended effective July 23, 2004 for an additional two years and may be renewed annually thereafter. The parties agreed to work together to jointly optimize DuPont's Nafion®membrane technology for MTI Mobion®our manufacturing costs until our proprietary fuel cell systems.

MTI Micro is also partypower solution has been shipped and billed to a supply agreement with DuPont providing that MTI Micro must purchase a majorityour customers. We intend to concentrate on our core competencies of any membrane it purchases for its fuel cell from DuPont for a period of five years, commencing with the first commercial sale of fuel cells in volume by MTI Micro, if DuPont can meet best price and best quality in the industry. DuPont owns a minority equity interest in MTI Micro.

Flextronics International USA, Inc. ("Flextronics"): In November 2004, MTI Micro entered into a Design Services Agreement with Flextronics for designresearch and development pre-productionand product design. This approach should reduce our fixed capital expenditures and allow us to efficiently scale production.

Utilize our Technology to Provide Compelling Products.We plan to utilize our intellectual property portfolio and technological expertise


to develop and offer portable power source products across multiple electronic device markets. We intend to employ our technological expertise to reduce the overall size and weight of our portable power source products while increasing their ease of manufacturing, power capacity, and power duration and decreasing their cost. We believe that these efforts will enable us to meet customer expectations and to achieve our goal of supplying on a timely and cost-effective basis the most environmentally friendly portable power source products to our target markets. We believe our products will offer advantages in terms of performance, functionality, size, weight, and ease of use. We plan to continue enhancing our customer’s industrial design manufacturing engineering, prototypingalternatives and first article manufacturing of MTI Micro's Mobion®fuel cell systems.device functionality through innovative product development based on our existing capabilities and technological advances.

Military Contractor:In December 2005, MTI Micro signed an Early Adopter Alliance Agreement with a leading provider of intelligence, secure communications systems, government services and homeland security. As part of this agreement, the parties will work together

Capitalize on Growth Markets.We intend to determine and evaluate the use and integration of MTI Micro's Mobion® technology into the contractor's unattended ground sensor products. The two companies will cooperatecapitalize on the demonstration of unattended ground sensor prototypes, identify military qualifications processes for any resulting products, and develop a market entry strategy for those products.

SES Americom Inc. ("SES Americom"):In December 2005, MTI Micro signed a Market Development Agreement with SES Americom, a world leader in satellite services and satellite-centric networks. As partgrowth of the agreement, the parties will determine and evaluate the use and integration of MTI Micro's Mobion® technology into SES Americomelectronic device markets, including new products that may benefitbe brought about by the convergence of computing, communications, and entertainment devices. We believe our portable power source products will address the growing need for portability, connectivity, and functionality in the evolving electronic device markets. We plan to offer these power solutions to OEM customers to enable them to offer products that have advantages in terms of size, weight, power duration, and environmental friendliness. We plan to utilize our existing technologies, as well as aggressively pursue new technologies and evolving markets that demand enhanced power solutions.

Develop Strong Customer Relationships.We plan to develop strong and long-lasting customer relationships with leading electronic device OEMs and to provide them with power solutions for their products. We believe that our portable power source products will enable our OEM customers to deliver a more positive user experience and to differentiate their products from alternative energy sources such as fuel cells. The two companiesthose of their competitors. We will attempt to enhance the competitive position of our customers by providing them with innovative, distinctive, and high-quality portable power supply products on a timely and cost-effective basis. We will work jointly oncontinually to improve our portable power source products, to reduce costs, and to speed the delivery of our products. We will endeavor to streamline our designs and delivery processes through ongoing design, engineering, and production improvement efforts. We will also devote considerable effort to support our customers after the purchase of our portable power source products.

Pursue Strategic Relationships.We intend to develop and expand strategic relationships to enhance our ability to offer value-added customer solutions, penetrate new markets, and strengthen the technological leadership of our portable power source products.

Products

Portable Power Source Products

We are developing three product categories of our Mobion technology: (i) external power charger products, (ii) snap-on or attached power source products, and (iii) embedded power source products. In addition, we are working with our strategic partners and suppliers to develop disposable methanol cartridges that will be used to fuel our portable power source products. Through our alliance with Duracell, we are developing fuel cartridges that will be designed and branded for mass market identification,commercialization. Duracell has experience in the sale and distribution of portable power through its battery products, as well as in the development, distribution, and deliverysale of prototypes, qualification processesliquid products with similar safety and packaging requirements as the 100% methanol cartridges.

External Power Charger:Our design for any resulting products and the development of a market entry strategy for those products.

Recent Grants , Contracts and Developments:During 2005, Saft America Inc. ("Saft"), received a $1million contract from the US Army Communications Electronic Command ("CECOM") to develop an advanced soliderexternal power system ("HASP") for military applications. MTI Microcharger is a subcontractor understandalone device that uses a standard and widely used universal serial bus, or USB, interface as a power output connector that can be used to recharge handheld mobile devices. Our current design for the device is roughly the size of two decks of playing cards (see photo below) and employs a 100% methanol fuel cartridge, which occupies the same volume as a pack of chewing gum. Our current prototype external power charger provides up to one month of power for the typical mobile phone. It can be designed to enable a professional photographer to take over 5,000 pictures using a high end digital camera from a single fuel tank. Our device is designed to provide 2.5 watts of power from its USB interface and also offer fast charge, ultra-long run time and self-charging modes.

 

Mobion external power charger prototypes


Snap-on or Attached Power Source Products:Similar to aftermarket battery attachments, our snap-on direct methanol fuel cell power solution is an attached power supply that is compatible with existing portable electronic devices and offers users extended run-time power. In this agreementcategory, we envision a number of product applications, including attachments for digital cameras, portable media players, GPS devices, and has receivedother consumer and electronic products. Our initial design is a purchase order for $470,000. As part of the contract, both Saftdirect methanol fuel cell camera-grip (see photo below) that replaces comparable rechargeable lithium-ion battery-pack grips and MTI Micro are working togetheris designed to build, test and demonstrate a system that combinesprovide twice as much energy as similar rechargeable lithium-ion battery-based products. Our Mobion direct methanol fuel cell camera grip allows photographers the benefits of bothextended usage plus the freedom to refill using a methanol cartridge rather than by plugging into a wall outlet.


Sample Mobion attached power source camera-grip prototype

Embedded power source products:Our goal is to produce direct methanol fuel cells and Lithium Ion battery technology. This contract is ongoing.

In January 2006, MTI Micro was notified by the U.S. Department of Energy ("DOE") that due to a reduction in funding levels to the Hydrogen, Fuel Cells & Infrastructure Technologies Program, MTI Micro will not receive its proportion of funding in 2006 for the $6.14 million, three-year, cost-shared development contract awarded to MTI Micro on August 1, 2004. Under this contract with MTI Micro, DOE authorized $2.35 million of spending on a cost-shared basis which ultimately will result in $1.17 million of contract revenue.  Since the U.S. Congress has not appropriated funding for FY2007, we cannot determine at this time if funding for FY2007 willcan be committed to this contract. 

4

During 2004, the New York State Energy and Research Development Authority ("NYSERDA") modified its original contract dated March 2002 twice to reflect the addition of Phase III for $348 thousand (Enhanced Energy Conversion Efficiency of Direct Methanol Fuel Cells - Validation and Testing) and Phase IV for $202 thousand (DMFCs for traffic sensors). The project supports DMFC technology development and commercialization efforts. This contract is ongoing.

In October 2004, MTI Micro received two contracts to demonstrate energy density advantages and to quantify potential logistical advantages of its Mobion®fuel cells for the U.S. Armed Forces.

In April 2004, MTI Micro enteredembedded into a $200 thousand contract with Cabot Superior Micro Powders ("CSMP") to evaluate the performance of CSMP's membrane electrode assembly ("MEA") for portable fuel cell application. During 2005, this contract was amended to increase the contract amount to $210 thousand. This contract was completed in 2005.

In November 2003, the Company entered into a $250 thousand contract with the Harris Corporation ("Harris") to build two prototype units of a DMFC hybrid power supply in a similar form factor of a military battery. The original agreement entered into in October 2003 for $200 thousand was modified in May 2004 increasing the contract to $250 thousand, and was again modified in 2005 to decrease the contract to $150 thousand. This contract was completed during 2005.

Marketing and Sales:In the New Energy segment, MTI Micro has an experienced sales and marketing organization. Pursuant to the Gillette strategic alliance agreement, Gillette and the Company have commenced a joint marketing effort to gather market information, generate and refine product roadmaps, establish key relationships, gather customer and OEM feedback and launch products into the marketplace.  MTI Micro regularly evaluates its target market by conducting primary and secondary research and actively meeting and speaking with key industry suppliers and OEMs. In addition, MTI Micro representatives attend and speak at numerous conferences and trade shows for fuel cells, fuel cell development, batteries and other relevant target markets.

MTI Micro's Mobion® technology was recognized with four industry awards since 2004. MTI Micro received the Frost & Sullivan 2005 Fuel Cell Entrepreneurial Company of the Year award and the 2004 Technology Innovation Award, and also accepted an award from Scientific American in recognition for its business leadership. A fourth award came in 2004 from Popular Science's Best of What's New as grand winner in the general innovations category.

Competition:We anticipate that the primary competitive considerations in MTI Micro's markets will be compatibility of DMFC power sources with portable electronic devices requirementsin order to increase their run time and to provide fast charge capability by hot-swapping 100% methanol cartridges. We have developed an embedded fuel cell concept model (see photo below) designed for a smart phone and believe that this concept model highlights the anticipated future product direction for our portable power pack size, energy content, reliability and price. We also believe the first company to successfully introduce a DMFC productsource products in the commercial markets will have significant advantages over its competitors. Many of MTI Micro's competitors have much greater access to capital, resources, component supplies, manufacturing capacity and distribution channels than MTI Micro. As such, because of the nature of product development, we cannot accurately determine our competitors' progress in developing DMFCs and whether such competitors' development efforts exceed MTI Micro's development efforts to date.consumer market.

We analyze MTI Micro's competition based, in part, on two separate components of the DFMC market: (1) companies developing and providing DMFCs producing greater than three watts of energy, particularly companies focused on providing power devices for lap top computers; and (2) companies developing DMFCs producing less than three watts of energy. Within both of these categories, we have witnessed substantial changes during the last five years. Significant new competitors have emerged in Asia, Europe and in the United States. In addition, companies based in Japan, Korea, Germany and the United States have made patent filings in the United States for DMFC technologies.

Our primary focus in consumer markets is for hand held (less than 3 watt energy range) devices. Based on certain publicly available information, we believe MTI Micro's major competitors in the less than three watt energy range are large Asian companies, such as,

5

Hitachi Ltd. ("Hitachi"), Fujitsu Limited ("Fujitsu"), Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. ("Samsung"), and Toshiba. These competitors have extensive patent portfolios and according to published reports, dedicated operations working on DMFCs and have publicly introduced prototypes. Hitachi demonstrated DMFCs in PDAs, Toshiba demonstrated DMFCs in Bluetooth headsets and in MP3 players, and Samsung has demonstrated an MP3 player. In addition, Samsung has publicly stated consumer market entry dates. We also compete with a number of smaller companies, such as, Medis Technologies Ltd., which announced a distribution and prototyping agreement with General Dynamics for military customers and a contract with Celestica in Ireland for the production of its power packs starting as early as the first quarter of 2007.

Based on certain publicly available information, we believe MTI Micro also faces significant competition in the greater than three watt energy range, and in particular from companies focused on providing power for lap top computers. In this segment, we believe our major competitors are large Japanese, Chinese, Korean and American companies, including but not limited to Canon Inc., Casio Computer Company Ltd., Nanfu Battery, Fujitsu Laboratories, UltraCell, Hitachi, Matsushita Electric Works (Panasonic), NEC, Samsung, Sanyo, and Toshiba. Each of these companies has greater access to resources than we do and, as the result of vertical integration, may have significant advantages in bringing product to market. We also consider Smart Fuel Cells AG ("Smart Fuel Cells"), based in Germany to be a significant competitor. Smart Fuel Cells has had product available in the market for three years. Other competitors include Protonex, a developer of fuel cell systems based on hydrogen PEM (proton exchan ge membrane) technology, and Millennium Cell, a developer of hydrogen battery technology for portable devices.

Intellectual Property and Proprietary Rights:MTI Micro relies on a combination of patent (both national and international), trade secret, trademark and copyright protection to protect its intellectual property ("IP"). MTI Micro's strategy is to apply for patent protection for all necessary design requirements. Additionally, MTI Micro systematically analyzes the existing IP landscape for DMFCs to determine where the greatest opportunities for developing IP exist.

In addition, MTI Micro enters into standard confidentiality agreements with its employees and consultants and seeks to control access to and distribution of its proprietary information. Even with these precautions, it may be possible for a third party to copy or otherwise obtain and use our products or technology without authorization or to develop similar technology independently. In addition, effective patent/copyright, and trade secret protection may be unavailable or limited in certain foreign countries.

As of December 31, 2005, MTI Micro has filed 76 U.S. patent applications, 21 of which have been awarded. Internationally, MTI Micro has filed 20 Patent Cooperation Treaty Applications, and 10 National Phase Patent Applications. MTI Micro has developed an extensive portfolio of patent applications in areas including fuel cell systems, components, controls, manufacturing processes and system packaging. 

 

MTI Micro believes

Concept model of a smart phone with an

embedded Mobion power source

Advantages of our Portable Power Source Products

We believe that our portable power source products will offer the following patents are material to its business and that all of its patents may be significant to its future business activities.advantages:

 

Number

Patent Title

Expiration Date

6,890,674

Methods and apparatuses for managing fluids inOff-the-grid power source.Our products provide users of consumer electronic devices with mobility by providing power without having to attach to a fuel cell systemwall outlet to recharge their devices.

02/19/2022

6,824,899

ApparatusSmall size and Methodslow weight.The dimensions of Sensor-less Optimizationour products will enable our OEM customers to reduce the overall size and weight of Methanoltheir products.

11/22/2020

Concentration in a DMFC

6,821,658

Cold StartPower density.Our products will have power density of over 50 mW/cm2 and Temperature Control Method and Apparatus for ahigh energy efficiencies of 1.4 Wh/cc of methanol.

03/02/2021

Fuel Cell System

6,794,067

Fuel Cell Control and Measurement Apparatus and Method UsingPower duration.Our products will offer longer run time than currently available portable charging systems.

11/29/2020

Dielectric Constant Measurement

6,761,988

FC System with Active Methanol Concentration ControlEase of manufacturing.Our products will be manufactured using traditional injection molding techniques that will easily transfer to mass-manufacturing production lines.

11/21/2020

6,686,081

Methods and Apparatuses for a Pressure Driven Fuel Cell SystemSafety.Our products will utilize methanol fuel, which does not require storage under pressure or at low temperatures.

05/15/2021

6,632,553

Methods and Apparatuses for Managing Effluent Products in a Fuel

03/27/2021Environmentally friendly.Our products will utilize fully biodegradable methanol fuel.

Cell System

6,590,370

Switching DC-DC Power Converter and Battery Charger for Use with a

10/01/2022

DOFC Power Source

In December 2000, MTI Micro licensed, on a non-exclusive basis, ten patent applications (eight issued and two abandoned) from Los Alamos National Laboratory ("LANL"). MTI Micro based its early DMFC systems work on these patents. MTI Micro has also licensed from LANL, on an exclusive basis, rights to European and Japanese counterpart applications for one LANL patent. In January 2005, MTI Micro and LANL modified the existing license such that it included in its entirety a total of nine issued U.S.


6

patents. No changes were made to the license fees or royalties due under such license. MTI Micro also has licensing rights and obligations with respect to IP developed under agreements with Gillette, DuPont and other vendors.

Codes and Standards: MTI Micro is a leader in the development of codes and standards associated with direct methanol fuel cells. Standards

In 2004, MTI Microwe became the world'sworld’s first company to obtain micro fuel cell safety compliance certifications for a fuel cell product from Underwriter'sUnderwriter’s Laboratory ("UL") and from CSA International ("CSA"). MTI MicroInternational. In addition, we received United Nations ("UN") packaging certification and wasour methanol cartridges were deemed compliant by the U.S. Department of Transportation for worldwide cargo shipment ofshipment. Certification is required for every commercial product prior to its methanol fuel cartridges. The methanol cartridges were manufactured by MTI Micro's manufacturing partner Flextronics, in San Jose, California.

In addition to being the first company to receive ULshipment. Based upon our previous experiences with these regulatory agencies, we do not anticipate delays associated with seeking Underwriter’s Laboratory and CSA certification, MTI Micro workedInternational product certifications for our commercial products, which are anticipated to helpbegin shipping in 2009.

Also, we helped to develop thea proposal adopted by the UN which givesUnited Nations to provide methanol fuel cartridges their owna separate classification a significant step forward for usand we worked with other micro fuel cell companies, and the industry. MTI Micro and others worked withappropriate regulatory bodies, to create agenerate the first draft of the international standards for methanol safety and use including those related to transport on commercial airplanes. At the same time, a number of presentations were made to various UN bodies in an effort to increase the understanding and acceptance of micro fuel cells and fuel cartridges.

As a result during 2005of our industry coalition efforts, the International Civil Aviation Organization's ("ICAO") safety panel recommended approval ofOrganization technical instructions and the transportationInternational Air Transport Association Dangerous Goods Regulations now permit airline passengers and crew to carry on and use of methanol fuel cells to power portable electronics in airplane passenger cabins. The action of this panel still needs to be submitted for comment to all ICAO members and then considered for final adoption by the 36-member ICAO Counc il, which could happen as early as the second quarter of 2006. If formally adopted, the regulation will go into effect on January 1, 2007. This is a key event in an on-going effort to develop regulatory acceptance ofcertain fuel cell power systems.systems and fuel cell cartridges containing methanol. The U.S. Department of Transportation is currently reviewing the International Civil Aviation Organization and International Air Transport Association air transport regulations and issued a notice of proposed rulemaking on September 20, 2007 to adopt the International Civil Aviation Organization passenger allowance and harmonize the U.S. requirements with the international standard. The public comment period on these proposed rules closed on November 19, 2007. We expect the U.S. Department of Transportation to adopt its proposed rules during 2008.

As part of the vote from ICAO's safety panel in 2005, butane and formic acid fuels were also approved but other fuels - such as hydrogen and sodium borohydride - were not approved outlining a possible barrier of entry into the business/leisure travel consumer market for those companies developing technologies with such fuels.

Test and Measurement Instrumentation SegmentProducts

MTI Instruments is

We are a world wideglobal supplier of computerized gauging instruments, metrology portable balancing equipment and inspection systems for semiconductor wafers. MTI Instruments products use state-of-the-art technology to solve complex real world applications in numerous industries including automotive, semiconductor, commercialwafers, and military aviation and data storage. MTI Instruments is currently investing in extending their sales reach and developing new product offerings. These investments include more automated and sophisticated sales and marketing management systems, expanded sales coverage in both Europe and the Far East and a concentrated focus on internet marketing. Product investments share a common theme: incorporation of our product technology into larger value added systems that enable MTI Instruments to offer the complete solutions that customers demand. MTI Instruments has industry recognized customer service and has worked with over 200 companies worldwide.

Products and Services: MTI Instruments has three product groups: General dimensional gaging, semiconductor and aviation. Our products consist of electronic, computerized gaging instruments for position, displacement and vibration applications for the design, manufacturing and test markets; semiconductor products for wafer characterization of semi-insulating and semi-conducting wafers for the semiconductor market; andjet engine balancing and vibration analysis systems for both military and commercial aircraft.systems.

General Dimensional Gaging:MTI Instruments' sensing systemsGauging:Our gauging instruments employ fiber optic, laser, and capacitance technologies to make nano-accurateprecision measurements in product design, production, and quality related processes.Gagingprocesses. Our gauging instruments include capacitance gauging systems offering ultra-high precision measurement, a fiber-optic based vibration sensor system with extremely high frequency response, a high-speed laser sensor system utilizing the latest complementary metal-oxide semiconductor/charge-coupled device technology, and a stand-alone data acquisition system that incorporates multiple sensor technologies. These products include laser, fiber-opticare targeted towards the data storage, semiconductor, and capacitance systems that measure a variety of parameters including displacement, position, vibration and dimension.automotive industries.

Listed below are selected MTI Instruments product offerings:

Product

Description

Markets Served

Accumeasureä 9000

Ultra-high precision capacitive gaging system offering nanotechnology accuracy.

Data storage, semiconductor and automotive industries.

MTI-2100 Fotonicä Sensor

Fiber-optic based vibration sensor with extremely high frequency response.

Data storage, semiconductor and automotive industries.

Microtrakä II

High speed laser sensor utilizing the latest complementary metal-oxide semiconductor/charge-coupled device technology.

Data storage, semiconductor and automotive industries.

7

Semiconductor: MTI Instruments'Our family of wafer metrology systems range from manually operated units to fully automated systems, which test key wafer characteristics critical to producing high qualityhigh-quality chips used in the semiconductor industry. These units are used as quality control tools delivering highly precise measurements for thickness variations, bow, warp, resistivity, and flatness. These systems can be used on substrates varying widely in size and materials. Our wafer metrology systems include an automated wafer characterization system, a semi-automated, full wafer surface scanning system, and a device that provides for manual, non-contact measurements.

The semiconductor product line includes the following products:

Product

Description

Markets Served

ProformaTM AutoScan 200

Fully automated wafer characterization system for measuring thickness, total thickness variation ("TTV"), bow, warp, bulk resistivity, site and global flatness. The Proforma™ AutoScan 200 features pick and place robotics, laser cassette scanning, auto-sensing cassette stands for wafers of 75 - 200 mm diameter and a modular design for easy upgrades.

Wafer metrology segment of the semiconductor industry.

ProformaTM 200SA/300SA

Semi-automated, full wafer surface scanning for thickness, TTV, bow, warp, site and global flatness. The Proforma™ 200SA can be used for all wafer materials and accommodates diameters of 75 - 200 mm.

Wafer metrology segment of the semiconductor industry.

ProformaTM 300/300G

Manual, non-contact measurement of wafer thickness, TTV and bow. The Proforma™ 300 measures all wafer materials including Silicon, Gallium-Arsenide, Indium-Phosphide and wafers mounted to sapphire or tape. The Proforma™ 300/G can accept wafers from 50 to 300 mm.

Wafer metrology segment of the semiconductor industry.

Jet Engine Balancing Systems:

Aviation:MTI Instruments' computer-based PBSOur portable and test cell balance systems automatically collect and record aircraft engine vibration data, identify vibration or balance troubleissues in an engine, and calculate a solution to the problem. These units are used and recommended by major aircraft engine manufacturers, and are also used extensively by the U.S. Air Force, other military and commercial airlines and gas turbine manufacturers.

MTI Instruments' aviation products include vibration analysis and engine trim balance instruments and accessories for commercial and military jets. These products are designed to quickly pinpoint engine problems and eliminate unnecessary engine removals. Selected products in this area include:

Product

Description

Markets Served

PBS-4100 Portable Balancing System

The standard of the aviation industry worldwide, the portable PBS-4100 detects if an engine has a vibration problem or a trim balance problem and provides a solution. This system works on all engine types and models from all engine manufacturers.

Major commercial airlines, regional carriers, and the U.S. Military.

PBS-4100R Test Cell Vibration Analysis & Trim Balance System

Advanced trim balancing and diagnostic features for engine test cells.

Major commercial airlines, regional carriers, and the U.S. Military

PBS-3300

A compact balancing and vibration system for use in mobile test cells and distributed test stands.

Major commercial airlines, regional carriers, and the U.S. Military.

 

Technology

8

MarketingA fuel cell is an electrochemical energy conversion device, which is similar to a battery, that produces electricity from a liquid or gaseous fuel, such as methanol, and Sales:Inan oxidant, such as oxygen. Fuel cells are different from batteries in that they consume a reactant, which must be replenished, while batteries store electrical energy chemically in a closed system. Generally, the Testreactants flow in and Measurement Instrumentation segment, MTI Instruments markets itsreaction products flow out of the fuel cell. While the electrodes within a battery react and services using channelschange as a battery is charged or discharged, a fuel cell’s electrodes are catalytic and relatively stable.

The direct methanol fuel cell relies upon the reaction of distribution specificwater with methanol at the catalytic anode layer to each of its product groupsrelease protons and customer base.electrons, and form carbon dioxide. The general dimensional gaging product group markets it productselectrons pass through a combinationcircuit and generate electricity that can be used to power external devices. The protons generated through this reaction pass through the proton exchange membrane to the cathode, where they combine to form water. The anode and cathode layers of manufacturer representativesa direct methanol fuel cell are usually made of platinum particles and platinum ruthenium particles embedded on either side of a proton exchange membrane.


Methanol fuel cells need water at the anode and therefore pure methanol cannot be used without the provision of water via either active transport, such as the pumping of water generated at the cathode back to the anode layer (see Chart A), or a passive recirculation mechanism that incorporates pressurized internal ducts or piping. Without either an active or a passive recirculation mechanism, a direct methanol fuel cell would require the inclusion of water as a dilutant in the United States and distributors overseas. The semiconductor product group markets its products exclusively through domestic distributors and international sales representatives, whilemethanol fuel, which limits the aviation group primarily sells direct to the end user.

To supplement these efforts, the company utilizes both commercial and industrial search engines, targeted newsletters, an independent representative network and appropriate trade shows to identify and expand its customer base.

Comparisons of sales by class of products, which account for over 10 percentenergy content of the Company's consolidated sales, are shown belowdiluted fuel (see Chart B).

Direct Methanol Fuel Cell with Active Water Transport (Chart A)


Methanol Fuel Cell With Water As A Fuel Dilutant (Chart B)



Our Mobion technology eliminates the need for active water recirculation pumps or the inclusion of water as a fuel dilutant. The water required for reaction at the anode is transferred internally within the Mobion Chip from the site of water generation on the air-side of the cell through a proprietary, passive design that eliminates the need for water movement by external pumps, complicated re-circulation loops or other micro-plumbing tools (see Chart C).

Our Mobion Technology with 100% Methanol and Passive Water Recirculation (Chart C)


Our Mobion solution contains a passive water recirculation sub-system that allows for the years endedconsumption of 100% methanol, results in a reduced parts count design and offers the advantage of higher energy density than competing fuel cell technologies for portable electronic devices.

Strategic Agreements

On May 16, 2006, we entered into an alliance with Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., or Samsung, to develop next-generation fuel cell prototypes for Samsung’s mobile phone business. We developed, and together with Samsung we jointly tested and evaluated, our Mobion technology for several Samsung mobile phone applications. We are continuing to work with Samsung on a non-exclusive collaboration under which we continue to refine our Mobion baseline product design. We will share development updates with Samsung and loan them prototypes for evaluation. Samsung may also request changes to product specifications until December 31:2008 and may purchase commercial samples as soon as they become available.

2005

2004

2003

(Dollars in thousands)

Sales

%

Sales

%

Sales

%

Aviation

$ 3,013

50.12

$ 4,027

53.48%

$ 2,931

52.84%

General Gaging

2,688

44.71

2,393

31.78

2,289

41.26

Semiconductor

311

5.17

 

1,110

14.74

 

327

5.90

Total

$ 6,012

100.00%

 

$7,530

100.00%

 

$5,547

100.00%

         

Product DevelopmentOn September 19, 2003, we entered into a strategic alliance agreement with the Duracell division of The Gillette Company, or Duracell, under which we agreed to work with Duracell to develop and Manufacturing:MTI Instruments is working on expanding its range of capacitancecommercialize complementary methanol fuel cell products to increase penetrationpower mass market, high-volume portable consumer devices. The agreement provides for a multi-year partnership for the design, development, and commercialization of a low power direct methanol fuel cell power system and a compatible fuel refill system. The arrangement provides for us to receive a percentage of net revenues related to Duracell’s sale of fuel refills for methanol fuel cells. The agreement gives Duracell the ability to make equity investments in MTI Micro. Duracell has made an initial $1.0 million investment in MTI Micro common stock and may make additional investments of up to $4.0 million, subject to agreed upon milestones related to technical and marketing progress. Any further investment by Duracell in MTI Micro will effectively dilute our ownership interest in MTI Micro, although we do not believe that such dilution will be substantial.

On August 1, 2004, we entered into new market segments and management believes thata $6.1 million cost-shared development contract with the successU.S. Department of Energy, or the enterprise depends to a large extent upon innovation, technological expertise and new product development.Initiatives are underway to bring new products to market during 2006. MTI Instruments also plans to continueDOE, for the development of advanced PBS systemsmanufacturing techniques and the optimization of our Mobion product solutions. Through February 2008, the DOE has authorized $5.5 million of spending on a cost-shared basis.

On December 13, 2007, we entered into an agreement with Trident Systems, Inc. to pursue opportunities to leverage our consumer market platform into low-power military markets. Teaming opportunities include demonstrations of unattended ground sensor prototypes powered by Mobion and evaluations and potential submissions of proposals for use inmilitary programs.


Manufacturing

We plan to outsource manufacturing of our portable power source products through third-party relationship contract manufacturers. We believe this strategy will provide us with a business model that allows us to concentrate on our core competencies of research and development and technological know-how and reduce our capital expenditures. In addition, this strategy will significantly reduce our working capital requirements for inventory because we will not incur most of our manufacturing costs until we have actually shipped our portable power source products to our customers and billed those customers for those products. To date, we have established an internal developmental pilot production line to test our design and engineering capabilities. Although we have developed an internal developmental pilot production line, we intend to rely upon third parties to forecast production requirements and have established the militarybasic design, function, and commercial markets.performance of our in-house engineering capabilities to foster the successful commercialization of our products.

MTI Instruments' latest

The commercialization of our Mobion power solution will depend upon our ability to reduce the costs of our portable power source products, as they are currently more expensive than existing rechargeable battery technologies. In addition, we continue to work on enhancing our Mobion power source, including our injection molded Mobion Chip, design to ensure its manufacturability (including engineering, verification and product offerings include: In the general gaging area,testing), design for 2004, MTI Instruments introduced the MTI-2100 Fotonic™ Sensor - a "next generation" fiber-optic sensorassembly, design for high-resolution, non-contacttestability, and design for serviceability, all of which are critical to successful high-volume production.

We assemble and test our test and instrumentation measurement of high frequency vibration and motion analysis. The amplifier replaced the MTI-2000 Fotonic Sensor. MTI Instruments also added the 1515 low-noise amplifier to its Accumeasure line. It is designed to meet the stringent requirements of brake rotor measurement applications in the automotive industry. In Semiconductors, for 2004, MTI Instruments introduced the Proforma™ 300SA - a semi-automated tool for measuring thickness, total thickness variation, bow, warp, stress and flatness of 300mm wafers. In aviation, for 2004, MTI Instruments introduced the PBS-3300 - a compact balancing and vibration diagnostics system for use in mobile test cells and distributed test stands. The PBS-3300 is currently being used to balance the AGT 1500 gas turbine engine in the U.S. Army's M1A1 tank.

MTI Instruments assembles and tests its products at itsour facilities located in Albany, New York. MTI Instruments believesWe believe that itsour existing assembly and test capacity is sufficient to meet itsour current needs and short termshort-term future requirements. Also, management believesWe believe that most of the raw materials used in our test and measurement products are readily available from a variety of vendors.

Sales and Marketing

We plan to sell our portable power source products for incorporation into the products of our OEM customers or to be sold as accessories through them. We plan to generate sales to OEM customers through direct sales employees as well as outside sales representatives and distributors. We have recently established sales representatives in South Korea and Japan.

We build awareness in our target markets through a series of targeted campaigns, which include our website, e-mails, conferences, tradeshows, and other standard marketing efforts. In addition, we monitor developments in the portable power industry through subscriptions with well known firms such as Frost and Sullivan, a wide array of publications, active public relations, updates with industry analysts and the investment community, and speaking engagements.

We market our test and measurement instrumentation products through a combination of direct sales personnel and domestic and international distributors. We expect this business to continue to achieve double digit year over year growth.

Customers

We expect that our customers for our portable power source products will include a number of the world’s largest electronic device OEMs.

Sales of our test and measurement instrumentation products to Koyo, our Japanese distributor, and the U.S. Air Force accounted for 27.8% and 26.4%, respectively, of product revenue in 2007. In 2006, sales to the U.S. Air Force and Koyo accounted for 23.1% and 22.9%, respectively, of product revenue. No other customer accounted for more than 10% of our product revenue in either 2006 or 2007.


Competition

We expect that the primary competitive factor in our portable power source business will be market acceptance of our portable power source products as an alternative power source to conventional lithium-ion and other rechargeable batteries. Market acceptance of our portable power source products will depend on a wide variety of factors, including the compatibility of direct methanol fuel cell power sources with portable electronic devices and the market’s assessment of the advantages offered by our products in terms of size, weight, power density and duration, safety, reliability, and environmental friendliness when measured against price disadvantages. We anticipate direct competition from large Asian-based companies and some of our potential OEM customers.

Competition in the sale of our measurement and instrumentation products is based on product quality, performance, price, and timely delivery. Our competitors for test and measurement instrumentation products include National Instruments, KLA-Tencor, Capacitec, Sigma Tech, Corning Tropel, Chadwick-Helmuth, ACES Systems, Micro-Epsilon, and Keyence.

Product Development

Over the past two years, we have developed and built a number of engineering prototypes used to validate our technology and to generate discussions with potential customers about the inclusion of our technology in new products. During the same period, we have created three generations of external power charger prototypes, each of which has shown a dramatic size reduction over the previous generation. Our latest external power charger prototype achieved a 60% reduction in volume over our first generation prototype.

We have improved the capabilities of our Mobion Chip technology during the last two years, which we expect will continue to evolve as we integrate greater functionality into our designs. This continuous iterative integration process is intended to reduce the size, simplify the design and construction, and reduce assembly complexity of our technology. We continue to improve the product design of the Mobion Chip and believe that future product generations will deliver performance improvements in terms of energy density, size, weight, and power duration and should be able to power wireless electronic devices for longer periods of time than rechargeable lithium-ion batteries.

Intellectual Property and Proprietary Rights: MTI Instruments reliesRights

We rely on a combination of patent (both national and international), trade secret, lawstrademark, and patentscopyright protection to establish and protect our intellectual property. Our strategy is to apply for patent protection for all significant design requirements. Additionally, we systematically analyze the proprietary rights of its products. In addition, MTI Instruments entersexisting intellectual property landscape for direct methanol fuel cells to determine where the greatest opportunities for developing intellectual property exist. We also enter into standard confidentiality agreements with itsour employees, consultants, vendors, partners and consultantspotential customers and seeksseek to control access to and distribution of itsour proprietary information. Even

As of December 31, 2007, we had filed over 90 U.S. patent applications, 43 of which have been awarded. Of the awarded patents, 34 are assigned to us and 9 are assigned to Duracell as part of our strategic alliance agreement with these precautions, it may be possiblethem. We have filed 22 Patent Cooperation Treaty Applications and have filed for National Phase Patent Protection for 12 pieces of intellectual property in multiple countries, including Japan, the European Union, and South Korea. We have developed a third partyportfolio of patent applications in areas including fuel cell systems, components, controls, manufacturing processes, and system packaging.

Research and Development

Our research and development team is responsible for advanced research, product planning, design and development, and quality assurance. Through our supply chain, we are also working with subcontractors in developing specific components of our technologies.

The primary objective of our research and development program is to copy or otherwise obtain and useadvance the development of our direct methanol fuel cell technology to enhance the commercial value of our products orand technology, without authorization oras well as to develop similar technology independently. In addition, effective patentnext generation fuel cell products.

We have incurred research and trade secret protection may be unavailable or limiteddevelopment costs of approximately $9.7 million, $12.9 million and $11.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006, and 2007, respectively. We expect to continue to invest in certain foreign countries. MTI Instruments has one patent issued supporting its semiconductor product line.

Significant Customers: MTI Instruments' largest customers include the U.S. Air Forceresearch and companiesdevelopment in the computer, electronic, semiconductor, automotive, aerospace, aircraftfuture.


Employees

As of December 31, 2007, we had 107 employees compared with 132 as of December 31, 2006. Of these employees, 46 were involved in our portable power source business (including 25 scientists and bioengineering fields. Inengineers, of whom 18 had advanced degrees) and 46 were involved in our test and measurement instrumentation business. Fifteen of our employees are involved in corporate functions.

Properties

We presently lease two premises, one located at 325 Washington Avenue Extension, Albany, New York and the Testother at 431 New Karner Road, Albany, New York. Both leases expire at the end of 2009. The 325 Washington Avenue Extension premise consists of approximately 20,700 useable square feet of space, and Measurement Instrumentation Segment,the 431 New Karner Road consists of approximately 23,500 useable square feet of space. Together, the premises are adequate for our current and foreseeable needs.

Legal Proceedings

We are not currently involved in 2005, the U.S. Air Force accounted for $2.385 million or 39.7% of product revenues; in 2004, the U.S. Air Force accounted for $3.508 million or 46.6% of product revenues; in 2003, the U.S. Air Force accounted for $2.261 million or 40.8% of product revenues. A loss of the U.S. Air Force as a customerany legal proceeding that we believe would have a material adverse effect on this segment.

Recent Contracts: In 2002, MTI Instruments was awarded a multi-year U.S. Air Force contract to service and retrofit existing PBS-4100 jet engine balancing systems with the latest diagnostic and balancing technology could potentially generate up to a total of $8.8 million in sales for the Company between the years 2002 and 2007. As of December 31, 2005, MTI Instruments had recorded $5.3 million in orders for approximately 59% of the five-year contract's total value.

9

Competition: MTI Instruments is subject to competition from several companies, many of which are larger than MTI Instruments and have greaterour business or financial resources. MTI Instruments' competitors include ADE Corporation, Sigma Tech Corporation, Corning Tropel Corporation, Chadwick-Helmuth, ACES Systems and Keyence Corporation. While MTI Instruments has a share of its respective specialized market segments, it does not consider its share to be dominant within its industry. The primary competitive considerations in MTI Instruments' markets are product quality and performance, price, timely delivery, and the ability to identify, pursue and bring new customers. MTI Instruments believes that its employees, product development skills, sales and marketing systems and reputation are competitive advantages.

Employees

The total number of employees of MTI and its subsidiaries was 125 as of December 31, 2005, as compared to 128 as of December 31, 2004. Fiscal 2005 employees include corporate operations and the Company's two subsidiaries, MTI Micro and MTI Instruments. Executives and staff were chosen for their acumen, ability and experience in areas critical to the execution of the Company's core business strategy.

Financing Arrangements

Private Placement:The Company entered into a financing transaction with Fletcher International, Ltd. ("Fletcher"), on January 29, 2004 and amended the terms of such transaction on May 4, 2004. To date, Fletcher has purchased 2,680,671 shares of our common stock pursuant to such financing transaction. In addition, Fletcher has the right to purchase an additional $20 million of MTI's common stock, on one or more occasions, at a price of $6.023 (adjusted from $6.34) per share at any time prior to December 31, 2006. Fletcher also has the right to receive Company shares without payment upon the occurrence of certain events, including but not limited to, failing to register for resale with the SEC shares purchased by Fletcher on the agreed upon time table, a restatement of the Company's financial statements, change of control of the Company and issuance of securities at a price below Fletcher's purchase price. We have filed registration statements covering all of the shares purc hased by Fletcher to date and in the event of any additional purchases we are similarly obligated to file one or more registration statements covering the resale of such shares. In connection with the late effective date for the registration statement filed on January 6, 2005, the Company issued and registered 66,413 shares of common stock to Fletcher without any additional payment. At December 31, 2005, Fletcher owned 393,515 shares or 1.3% of the Company's common stock.

Gillette Company ("Gillette"):Gillette entered into a strategic alliance agreement with MTI Micro on September 19, 2003, whereby MTI Micro, Gillette and Gillette's Duracell business unit will seek to jointly develop and commercialize micro fuel cell products to power high-volume, low-power, hand-held and mass market portable consumer devices. This agreement was amended on June 20, 2005 and August 18, 2004. Pursuant to the agreement, Gillette purchased 1,088,278 shares of MTI Micro common stock (362,760 post 2004 1-for-3 reverse split) at a price of $.92 ($2.76 post 2004 1-for-3 reverse split) per share for $1 million. In connection with this agreement, Gillette may make additional investments of up to $4 million subject to agreed milestones.

Operations Sold or Discontinued

Ling Electronics, Inc. and Ling Electronics Limited (collectively, "Ling") were sold on October 21, 1999 to SatCon in exchange for 770,000 shares of SatCon common stock (which stock had a market value of approximately $6.7 million on the transaction date). At the time of the sale, Ling designed, manufactured, and marketed electro-dynamic vibration test systems, high-intensity-sound transducers, power conversion equipment and power amplifiers used to perform reliability testing and stress screening during product development and quality control.

The sale of the Company's Technology Division, the sole component of the Technology segment, to NYFM, Incorporated (a wholly-owned subsidiary of Foster-Miller, Inc., a Waltham, Massachusetts-based technology company) was completed on March 31, 1998. Accordingly, the Company no longer includes such Technology Division among its reportable business segments. The Technology Division has been reported as a discontinued operation since December 26, 1997. See Note 18 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements referred to in Item 8 below.

Backlog

The backlog of orders believed to be firm is as follows:

December 31, 2005

$0.9 million

December 31, 2004

$0.5 million

December 31, 2003

$0.4 million

The backlog relates to contracts and purchase orders received from commercial customers and government agencies.condition.

 

10

Segment Information

Segment information is set forth in Note 19 - Geographic and Segment Information - of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements referred to in Item 8 below and incorporated herein by reference.

Subsequent Events

Sales of Securities available for Sale:From January 1 through March 13, 2006, the Company sold securities available for sale as follows:

(Dollars in thousands)

  
 

Number of

Proceeds

Company

Shares Sold

from Sales

   

Plug Power

303,500

$1,805

Lease Termination:MTI Micro entered into a Lease Termination Agreement in connection with certain premises at 750 University Avenue, Suite 270, Los Gatos, CA with 750 University, LLC. The Lease Termination Agreement was fully executed on February 9, 2006 with a lease termination effective date of January 31, 2006. The Company accrued $25 thousand in connection with this lease termination obligation.

Contracts: In January 2006, MTI Micro was notified by the DOE that due to a reduction in funding levels to the Hydrogen, Fuel Cells & Infrastructure Technologies Program, MTI Micro will not receive its proportion of funding in 2006 for the $6.14 million, three-year, cost-shared development contract awarded to MTI Micro on August 1, 2004. Under this contract with MTI Micro, the DOE has only authorized $2.35 million of spending on a cost-shared basis which will ultimately result in $1.17 million of contract revenue.  Since the U.S. Congress has not appropriated funding for FY2007, the Company cannot determine at this time if funding for 2007 will be committed to this contract. 

Availability of Information

The Company makesWe make available through our website (http://www.mechtech.com), free of charge, our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports, filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as soon as reasonably practicable after such reports are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the SEC. These reports may be accessed through the Company's website'sour website’s Investor Relations page.

The public may read and copy any materials the Company fileswe file with the SEC at the SEC'sSEC Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Room 1580, Washington, DC 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The Company filesWe file electronically with the SEC and the SEC maintains an Internet site (http://www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC.


Item 1A: Risk Factors

Factors Affecting Future Results

This Annual Report on Form 10-K and the documents we have filed with the Securities and Exchange CommissionSEC that are incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K contain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Any statements contained, or incorporated by reference, in this Form 10-K that are not statements of historical fact may be forward-looking statements. When we use the words "anticipates," "plans," "expects," "believes," "should," "could," "may," "will"“anticipate,” “estimate,” “plans,” “projects,” “continuing,” “ongoing,” “expects,” “management believes,” “we believe,” “we intend,” “should,” “could,” “may,” “will” and similar expressions,words or phrases, we are identifying forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements involve risks, uncertainties, estimates and uncertainties,assumptions which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from those expressed or implied by forward-looking statements. These factors include, among others:

11

our history of recurring net losses and the risk of continued net losses;

our independent auditors raising substantial concern about our ability to continue as a going concern;

the potential delisting of our common stock from The Nasdaq Global Market;

sales revenue growth of our test and measurement instrumentation business may not be achieved;

the dependence of our test and measurement instrumentation business on a small number of customers and potential loss of government funding;

risks related to developing Mobion direct methanol fuel cells and whether we will ever successfully develop reliable and commercially viable Mobion fuel cell solutions;

our need to raise additional financing;

risks relating to the market price of Plug Power common stock;

the risk that current regulations will not be changed to permit methanol to be carried onto airplanes;

our portable power source products or our customers’ products that utilize our portable power source products may not be accepted by the market;

our inability to build and maintain relationships with our customers;

our limited experience in manufacturing fuel cell systems on a commercial basis;

our dependence on others for our production requirements for our portable power source products;

our dependence on our manufacturing subcontractors to maintain high levels of productivity and satisfactory delivery schedules for our portable power source products;

our dependence on third-party suppliers for most of the manufacturing equipment necessary to produce our portable power source products;

our inability to obtain sufficient quantities of components and other materials, including platinum and ruthenium, necessary for the production of our portable power source products;

our dependence on OEMs integrating Mobion fuel cell systems into their devices;

our lack of long-term purchase commitments from our customers and the ability of our customers to cancel, reduce, or delay orders for our products;

risks related to protection and infringement of intellectual property;

our new technologies may not result in customer or market acceptance;

our ability to commercialize our proposed portable power source solutions and develop new product solutions on a timely basis;

our ability to develop and utilize new technologies that address the needs of our customers;

intense competition in the direct methanol fuel cell and instrumentation businesses;

change in policies by U.S. or foreign governments that hinder, disrupt or economically disadvantage international trade;

the impact of future exchange rate fluctuations;

uncertainty of the U.S. economy;

the historical volatility of our stock price;

the cyclical nature of the electronics industry;

failure of our strategic alliances to achieve their objectives or perform as contemplated and the risk of cancellation or early termination of such alliance by either party;

product liability or defects;

risks related to the flammable nature of methanol as a fuel source;

the loss of services of one or more of our key employees or the inability to hire, train, and retain key personnel;

significant periodic and seasonal quarterly fluctuations in our results of operations; and

other factors referred to under the caption “Risk Factors” below.

Except as may be required by applicable law, we do not undertake or intend to update or revise our forward-looking statements, and we assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statements contained in, or incorporated by reference into, this Annual Report on Form 10-K as a result of new information or future events or developments. Thus, youassumptions should not assumebe made that our silence over time means that actual events are bearing out as expressed or implied in such forward-looking statements.


Risk Factors

Set forth below are certain risks and uncertainties that could adversely affect our results of operations or financial condition and cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed in our forward-looking statements. Also refer to Factors Affecting Future Results.

We have incurred recurring net losses and anticipate continued net losses as we execute our commercialization plan for our portable power source business.

We have incurred recurring net losses, including net losses of $15.1 million in 2005, $13.7 million in 2006, and $9.6 million in 2007, which includes a net gain of $2.5 million from the sale of securities available for sale and a net gain of $3.0 million on derivatives in 2007. As a result of ongoing operating losses, we had an accumulated deficit of approximately $105.1 million as of December 31, 2007. We expect to continue to make significant expenditures and incur substantial expenses as we develop and commercialize our proposed portable power source products; develop our manufacturing, sales, and distribution networks; implement internal systems and infrastructure; and hire additional personnel. As a result, we expect to continue to incur continued significant losses as we execute our plan to commercialize our portable power source business and may never achieve or maintain profitability. We will be unable to satisfy our current obligations solely from cash generated from operations or become profitable until we successfully commercialize our portable power source business. If we continue to incur substantial losses and are unable to secure additional sources of funding, we could be forced to discontinue or curtail our business operations; sell assets at unfavorable prices; or merge, consolidate, or combine with a company with greater financial resources in a transaction that may be unfavorable to us.

We have received a going concern report from our independent auditors.

Our auditors have included an explanatory paragraph in their opinion that accompanies our audited consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2007, indicating that our recurring losses from operations, net capital deficiency, and current liquidity position raise additionalsubstantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Our common stock may be delisted from The Nasdaq Global Market, which may adversely affect our ability to raise capital and stockholders’ ability to completesell their shares.

Nasdaq notified us on January 9, 2008 that our common stock could be delisted from The Nasdaq Global Market for failure to maintain a minimum bid price of $1.00 and that we had until July 7, 2008 to regain compliance with the listing standards of such market. To regain compliance, the closing bid price of our common stock must meet or exceed $1.00 per share for a minimum of 10 consecutive business days. If compliance is not regained, Nasdaq will notify us of its determination to delist our common stock, which we may appeal to its listings qualification panel. We may alternatively apply to transfer our common stock to The Nasdaq Capital Market if we satisfy all of its requirements, other than the minimum bid price, for initial inclusion on such market. If we elect to apply for such a transfer and if such application is approved, we will be afforded the remainder of a second 180 calendar day-period to regain compliance with the minimum bid price rule while listed on The Nasdaq Capital Market. A delisting from The Nasdaq Global Market may result in a decline of the price of our common stock and adversely affect our ability to raise capital through the sale of common stock.

We currently derive all of our product revenue from our test and measurement instrumentation business, but our principal focus is the development and commercialization plansof our portable power source business.

We currently derive all of our product revenue from our test and measurement instrumentation business, but our principal focus is the failure to complete such development and commercialization plans will materially adversely affect our business plans, prospects, results of operations and financial condition:Our cash requirements depend on numerous factors, including completion of our product development activities, our success in commercializing our Mobion®fuel cell systemsportable power source business. Our test and market acceptance of Mobion®fuel cells. Before we can successfully commercialize Mobion®fuel cells, we must completemeasurement instrumentation business is subject to a number of critical activities, and certain events must occur, including further product development; manufacturing process development; development of large-scale production capabilities; completion, refinement and management of our supply chain; completion, refinement, and management of our distribution channel; and further work on codes and standards critical to consumer acceptance,risks, including the existencefollowing:

a slow down or cancellation of federal regulations that permit methanol insales to the passenger compartmentmilitary as a result of passenger airplanes. Alla potential redeployment of this will be expensivegovernmental funding;

a failure to expand the business as a result of competition, a lack of brand awareness, or market saturation; and require significant capital resources that are well in excess

an inability to launch new products as a result of all current resources available to us. We believe that we will need to raise additional funds to achieve commercializationintensive competition, uncertainty of Mobion® fuel cells. However, we do not know whether we will be able to secure additional funding, or funding on acceptable terms, to pursuenew technology development, and developmental timelines.

In addition, our commercialization plans. We can raise funds in four ways: sale of certain of our Plug Power shares, sale of our Company's stock, sale of MTI Micro stocktest and sale of other assets. Pursuant to our amended agreement with Fletcher, they have the right to invest up to an additional $20 million in our common stock. However, theremeasurement instrumentation products can be no assurances that Fletcher will exercise such right. If Fletcher does not exercise its additional investment rights we may be forcedsold in quantity to increase thea relatively few number of P lug Power shares sold to fund operations, or reduce spending on micro fuel cell development. If additional funds are raised through the issuance of equity securities, the percentage ownership of our then current shareholders will be reduced. If adequate funds are not available to satisfy either short or long-term capital requirements, we may be required to limit operationscustomers, resulting in a manner inconsistent with our development and commercialization plans, which would materially adversely affect our business plans, prospects, results of operations and financial condition in future periods.

We are dependent on continued government funding for new energy research and development and MTI Instruments product sales.customer concentration risk. The loss of any significant portion of such contracts andcustomers or a material adverse change in the inability to obtain additional contracts mayfinancial condition of any one of these customers could have a material adverse effect on our business.


We have not generated any product revenue from our portable power source business plans, prospects, resultsand currently have no portable power source commercial products.

We have not generated any product revenue from our portable power source business and currently have no portable power source commercial products. The successful development and commercialization of operations, cash flowsour portable power source products will depend on a number of factors, including the following:

continuing our research and development efforts;

finalizing the design of our portable power source products;

securing OEM customers to incorporate our portable power source products into products sold by them;

arranging for adequate manufacturing capabilities; and

completing, refining, and managing our supply chain and distribution channels.

Additionally, our technology is new and complex, and there may be technical barriers to the development of our portable power source products. The development of our portable power source products may not succeed or may be significantly delayed. Our portable power source products will be produced through manufacturing arrangements that have not been finalized or tested on a commercial scale. If we fail to successfully develop or experience significant delays in the development of our portable power source products, or if there are significant delays in commercialization, we are unlikely to recover those losses, thus making it impossible for us to become profitable through the sales of these products. This would materially and adversely affect our business and financial condition:A large portioncondition. If adequate funds are not available, we may have to delay development or commercialization of revenues at MTI Instrumentsour portable power source products or license to third parties the rights to commercialize products or technologies that we would otherwise seek to commercialize. Any of these factors could harm our business and MTI Micro forfinancial condition.

Any revenue derived in the next several years may comerelatively near relating to our portable power source business likely will result from government contracts.governmental contracts or other governmental funding. We can offer no assurance that we will be able to secure continued government funding. The loss of such contracts and the inability to obtain additionaladditionally contracts could materially adversely affectharm our business plans, prospects, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.business.

We currently do not have sufficient funds to commercialize our portable power source products.

We may not successfully developwill need additional funding to commercialize our new technologyportable power source business. If we are unable to secure the necessary additional funding or to raise funds from the sale of our test and the failuremeasurement instrumentation business should we determine to do so, we may need to delay further commercialization plans. In order to conserve cash and extend operations while we pursue any additional necessary financing, we would be required to reduce operating expenses. There is no assurance that funds raised in any such a financing will materially adversely affect our business plans, prospects, results of operationsbe sufficient, that the financing will be available on terms favorable to us or to existing stockholders and financial condition:DMFCs are a new technology with many technical and engineering challenges still to be resolved. We cannot assureat such times as required, or that we will be able to successfully resolveobtain the technicaladditional financing required for the continued operation and engineering challenges

12

growth of DMFCs, or if we are successful, that such solutions will be commercially viable. Resolution of these technical and engineering issues requires substantial resources including financial, managerial and technical resources. We cannot assure that all the necessary resources will be available to the degree, and at the times, they are needed.our business. If we are unable to successfully develop Mobion®fuel cells,raise additional funds by issuing equity securities, our business plans, prospects, results of operations and financial condition would be materially adversely affected.

Current commitments for joint development, distribution, marketing and investment by The Gillette Company (Gillette) and its Duracell divisionstockholders will experience dilution. Debt financing, if available, may be subject to early termination and any such early termination will have material adverse consequences on MTI Micro's and the Company's business plans, prospects, results of operations and financial condition:Gillette and its Duracell division's commitments in the strategic alliance agreement and the other agreements entered into as a part of the strategic alliance transaction (including those commitments relating to joint development, distribution, marketing and investment) with MTI Micro are subject to early termination. Either MTI Microinvolve restrictive covenants.  Any debt financing or Gilletteadditional equity financing may terminate the strategic alliance agreement for cause at any time and at certain pre-defined periods of time, if technical milestonescontain terms that are not completedfavorable to the satisfaction of the other party. Gillette may also terminate the strategic alliance agreement prior to mass market commercializa tion if it decides not to establish fuel refill manufacturing capability.

The investment agreement with Gillette may be terminated if the strategic alliance agreement is terminated. In addition, any future investment by Gillette is conditioned upon MTI Micro reaffirming that the representations and warranties in the investment agreement are true as of the date of such investment. These representations and warranties include statements concerning ownership of intellectual property, and affirmations that MTI Micro is not infringing on the intellectual property of others and others are not infringing on MTI Micro's intellectual property. At this time we cannot determine whether MTI Micro will be able to make these statements as of the date of any potential future investments by Gillette, and the inability to make such statements could result in Gillette terminating the investment agreement.

Termination of MTI Micro's agreements with Gillette and its Duracell division would have material adverse consequences on MTI Micro's and the Company's business plans, prospects, results of operations and financial condition.

MTI Micro may never complete the development of commercially acceptable Mobion® fuel cell products and may not be able to achieve profitable commercialization of its products in the military/industrial and consumer market on the timetable it anticipates,us or at all, and any such delay or failure would have material adverse consequences on MTI Micro's and the Company's business plans, prospects, results of operations and financial condition:We cannot guarantee that MTI Micro will be able to develop commercially viable Mobion® fuel cell products in the military/industrial and consumer market on the timetable it anticipates, or at all. The commercialization of Mobion® fuel cell products requires substantial technological advances to improve the efficiency, functionality, reliability, cost, performance and environmental operating latitude of these systems and products and to develop commercial volume manufacturing processes for these systems a nd products. We cannot guarantee that MTI Micro will be able to develop the technology necessary for commercialization of Mobion® fuel cell products, or acquire or license the required technology from third parties. MTI Micro's failure to develop the technology necessary for high-volume commercialization of Mobion® fuel cells that are reliable, cost effective and present a value proposition to the customer will, in each case, have a material adverse effect on MTI Micro's and the Company's business plans, prospects, results of operations and financial condition.

A mass market for fuel cells may never develop or may take longer to develop than we anticipate.

Fuel cell systems represent emerging technologies, and we do not know whether consumers will adopt these technologies on a large scale or whether OEMs will incorporate these technologies into their products. In particular, if a mass market fails to develop, or develops more slowly than anticipated, for methanol portable power applications, we may be unable to recover our expenditures to develop our fuel systems and may be unable to achieve or maintain profitability, any of which could negatively impact our business. Estimates for the development of a mass market for fuel cell products and systems have lengthened in recent years. Many factors that are beyond our control may have a negative effect on the development of a mass market for fuel cells and our fuel systems for methanol applications. These factors include the following:

13

Our cost to produce our current Mobion®fuel cell product exceeds the amount for which we can currently sell such product. If we are unable to reduce the costs of our Mobion®fuel cells, it will have a material adverse effect on MTI Micro's and the Company's

business plans, prospects, results of operations and financial condition:The commercialization of MTI Micro's Mobion® fuel cell products depends upon MTI Micro's ability to significantly reduce the costs of these systems and products, since they are currently substantially more expensive than systems and products based on existing technologies, such as rechargeable batteries.

The price of our fuel cell products is dependent largely on material and other manufacturing costs. We are unable to offer any assurance that either we or a contract manufacturer will be able to reduce costs to a level which will allow production of a competitive product that the consumer finds attractive or that any product produced using lower cost materials and manufacturing processes will not suffer from a reduction in performance, reliability and longevity.

The production costs of our initial industrial product were higher than its sales price. We recognize that successfully implementing our strategy and obtaining a significant share of the military, industrial and consumer markets requires that we offer our direct methanol fuel cell products at competitive prices, which can only be accomplished when production costs are cut substantially from current levels. If we are unable to produce direct methanol fuel cell products at competitive prices relative to alternative technologies and products, our target market customers will be unlikely to buy our fuel cell products.

The failure to achieve cost reductions may materially adversely affect MTI Micro's and the Company's business plans, prospects, results of operations and financial condition.

Gillette may not be able to achieve commercialization of fuel refills on the timetable we anticipate, or at all, and the delay or failure to achieve such commercialization would have material adverse consequences on MTI Micro's and the Company's business plans, prospects, results of operations and financial condition:We cannot guarantee that Gillette will be able to, or will choose to, develop, acquire or license commercially viable fuel refills for Mobion® fuel cell products on the timetable we anticipate, or at all. The commercialization of fuel refills for Mobion® fuel cell products requires substantial technological advances to improve the efficiency, functionality, reliability, cost and performance of these systems and products and to develop commercial volume manufacturing processes for these systems and products. Gillette's failure to supply fuel refills would have a material adverse effect on MTI Micro's and the Company's business plans, prospects, results of operations and financial condition.

A viable market for micro fuel cell systems may never develop or may take longer to develop than we anticipate. If a market for fuel cells does not develop or is delayed, it will have a material adverse effect on our business plans, prospects, results of operations and financial condition:Micro fuel cell systems for portable electronic devices represent an emerging market, and we do not know the extent to which our targeted distributors and resellers will want to purchase them and whether end-users will want to use them. The development of a viable market for our systems may be impacted by many factors that are out of our control, including:

If a viable market fails to develop or develops more slowly than we anticipate, we may be unable to recover the losses we will have incurred to develop our product and we may be unable to achieve profitability, each of which would have a material adverse effect on our business plans, prospects, results of operations and financial condition.

Our first field test ready military application Mobion®fuel cell product could fail due to technical, customer acceptance, safety or other reasons. Any such failure could have a material adverse effect on MTI Micro's and the Company's business plans and prospects:We anticipate having field test ready military application Mobion®fuel cell products available for sale by the end of 2006. We may experience problems with the fuel cells, including reliability issues, run time, customer acceptance or safety. If the fuel cells experience failures, it could result in a material adverse effect on MTI Micro's and the Company's business plans and prospects.

14

Alternatives to our technology could render our systems obsolete prior to commercialization, which would have a material adverse effect on our business plans, prospects, results of operations and financial condition:Our Mobion® fuel cells are one of a number of alternative portable power energy solutions being developed as replacements for batteries, including thin film batteries, extended life lithium batteries and other types of fuel cell technologies. Technological advances in existing battery technologies or other fuel cell technologies may render our micro fuel cell systems obsolete and this would materially adversely affect our business plans, prospects, results of operations and financial condition.

MTI Micro is dependent upon external OEMs to purchase certain of its products and integrate Mobion® fuel cells into their products. If external OEMs do not purchase and integrate Mobion® fuel cells into their products, our market will be very limited, which could have a material adverse effect on MTI Micro's and the Company's business plans, prospects, results of operations and financial condition: To be commercially useful, certain of our Mobion®fuel cells must be integrated into products manufactured by OEMs. We cannot guarantee that OEMs will manufacture appropriate products or, if they do manufacture such products, that they will choose to use Mobion®fuel cells. Any integration, design, manufacturing or marketing problems encountered by OEMs could adversely affect the market for Mobion® fuel cells, which could have a material adverse effect on MTI Micro's and the Company's business plans, prospects, results of operations and financial condition.

In order to achieve mass commercialization of Mobion® fuel cells, customers must be able to carry methanol fuel inside the passenger compartment of commercial airlines. If current airline, Federal Aviation Administration ("FAA") and certain international regulations do not change, passengers will be unable to carry non-dilute methanol in the passenger compartments of airplanes, which will have a material adverse effect on MTI Micro's and the Company's business plans, prospects, results of operations and financial condition: Current airline and FAA regulations and certain international laws, regulations and treaties limit the amount and concentration of methanol that any passenger can carry aboard passenger planes. We believe that these regulations must change for mass commercialization of Mobion® fuel cell products to be possible. If pending regulatory changes are approved by ICAO, this will permit direct methanol micro fuel cells and refill cartridg es to be carried in the passenger compartment of airplanes. If these regulations do not change, it would materially adversely affect MTI Micro's ability to achieve mass commercialization of Mobion® fuel cell products and have a material adverse effect on MTI Micro's and the Company's business plans, prospects, results of operations and financial condition.

In connection with the 2004 private placement, we may have to (1) sell shares of our common stock at prices which result in substantial dilution to our shareholders, and (2) issue additional shares of our common stock to Fletcher at prices that may be substantially below market value at the time of issuance without any payment required by Fletcher, which would cause our shareholders to suffer additional dilution: After giving effect to the 1,261,829 shares of common stock we issued to Fletcher on December 22, 2004 (as well as all shares issued or to be potentially issued to Fletcher in connection with our failure to satisfy the registration requirement as discussed in Note 11, Shareholders' Equity), the 2004 private placement provided Fletcher additional investment rights to purchase up to an additional $20 million of our common stock at a price equal to $6.34 per share (subject to adjustment). This price has been reduced to $6.023 per share due to our failure to satisfy the registratio n requirement, and may be further reduced due to, among other things, continuing failure to satisfy such registration requirement. Any exercise of the additional investment rights could result in sales of our common stock at prices that are below the market price for our common stock at the time the investment right is exercised and could result in substantial dilution to our shareholders.

Our agreement with Fletcher also provides that Fletcher will receive additional shares of our common stock with respect to shares it already owns, and the exercise price and term relating to unexercised additional investment rights will be adjusted to the benefit of Fletcher, each upon the occurrence of certain events or circumstances, some of which are beyond our control, including:

In any event, 8,330,411 shares is the maximum number of shares of our common stock we may be required to issue to Fletcher, which amount includes the 1,418,842 shares issued on January 29, 2004, the 1,261,829 shares issued on December 22, 2004 and the 66,413 registration penalty shares issued on April 20, 2005.

15

In connection with the 2004 private placement, we are responsible for having the resale of shares purchased by Fletcher registered with the SEC within defined time periods and subject to penalties if the shares are not registered with the SEC within those defined time periods: Pursuant to our agreement with Fletcher, we are obligated, within ten business days after the closing of the purchase of

any additional shares by Fletcher pursuant to rights issued in connection with the 2004 Private Placement, to file a registration statement with the SEC covering the resale of all such shares. We are also obligated to cause each of those registration statements to be declared effective not more than sixty (60) days after the closing of the purchase of such shares, or if the registration statement is reviewed by the SEC, not more than ninety (90) days after the closing of the purchase of such shares. If we fail to file the registration statements or become effective as set forth above, we must issue to Fletcher a number of additional shares to reflect the number of shares it would have acquired if its purchase price was based on the actual exercise price reduced by five percent for each month in which we fail to satisfy our obligations and adjust the exercise price for the additional investment rights to such lower price. In addition, such failure may result in an extension of the investment term for ea ch day we fail to satisfy our registration obligations. The Company initially filed a Registration Statement on January 6, 2005 which was within ten business days after the closing of the purchase of additional shares by Fletcher on December 22, 2004. The 90-day deadline for this Registration Statement to be declared effective was March 22, 2005. Since the Registration Statement was declared effective on April 21, 2005, we failed to meet the March 22, 2005 deadline and therefore were required to issue 66,413 additional shares of common stock to Fletcher without any payment required on its part.

The sale of a substantial amount of our common stock in the public market could materially decrease the market price of our common stock: The Company agreed as part of the 2004 Private Placement with Fletcher to register for resale shares of our common stock owned by Fletcher. If Fletcher exercised its remaining investment right and a substantial amount of our common stock were sold in the public market, or even targeted for sale, it could have a material adverse effect on the market price of our common stock and our ability to sell common stock in the future.

Current shareholders may be diluted as a result of additional financings:stockholders. If we raise additional funds through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities in either the Company or MTI Micro, current shareholders' percentage ownership willcollaboration and licensing arrangements with third parties, it may be reduced. In addition, these transactions may dilute the value of common stock outstanding. Moreover, we may havenecessary to issue securities that may haverelinquish some rights preferences and privileges senior to our common stock. We cannot assure that we will be able to raise additional fundstechnologies or our products, or grant licenses on terms acceptable to us, if at all. If future financing is not available or is not available on acceptable terms, we may not be able to fund our future needs, which would have a material adverse effect on our business plans, prospects, results of operations and financial condition.

We may be involved in intellectual property litigation that causes us to incur significant expenses or prevents us from selling our products, which could have a material adverse effect on MTI Micro's and the Company's business plans, prospects, results of operations and financial condition:In recent years, hundreds of fuel cell patents have been issued worldwide. Many of these patents are broadly written and encompass basic and fundamental theories of how fuel cells should or could work. As we continue to develop our technology, our designs may infringe the patent or intellectual property rights of others. Whether our technology infringes or not, MTI Micro and our Company may become subject to lawsuits in which it is alleged that we have infringed the intellectual property rights of others. We may also commence lawsuits against others who we believe are infringing upon MTI Micro's rights. Involvement in intellectual property litigation could result in significant expense to MTI Micro and our Com pany, adversely affecting the development of sales of the challenged product or intellectual property and diverting the efforts of our technical and management personnel, whether or not such litigation is resolved in our favor. In the event of an adverse outcome as a defendant or plaintiff in any such litigation, MTI Micro and the Company may, among other things, be required to:

We cannot guarantee that MTI Micro or the Company would be successful in such development or acquisition or that such license would be available upon reasonable terms. Any such development, acquisition or license could require the expenditure of substantial time and other resources and could have a material adverse effect on MTI Micro's and the Company'sbusiness plans, prospects, results of operations and financial condition.

16

MTI Micro's products use potentially dangerous, flammable fuels, which could subject its business and the Company to product liability claims. Any such lawsuits or claims could have a material adverse effect on MTI Micro's and the Company's business

plans, prospects, results of operations and financial condition: The sale of Mobion® fuel cells exposes MTI Micro and the Company to potential product liability claims that are inherent in the methanol and products that use methanol industry. Methanol is flammable and therefore potentially dangerous. Any accidents involving MTI Micro's products or other methanol-based products could materially impede widespread market acceptance and demand for DMFCs which could have a material adverse effect on MTI Micro's and the Company's business plans and prospects. In addition, MTI Micro may be held responsible for damages beyond the scope of its insurance coverage. We also cannot predict whether MTI Micro will be ablenot favorable to maintain its insurance coverage on acceptable terms. Damages beyond the scope of MTI Micro's insurance coverage or the inability to maintain insurance coverage on acceptable terms would have a material adverse impact on MTI Micro's and the Company's business plans, prospect s, results of operations and financial condition.

We have incurred losses and anticipate continued losses. If we do not become profitable and sustain profitability, it will have a material adverse effect on our business plans, prospects, results of operations and financial condition: As of December 31, 2005, we had an accumulated deficit of $81.718 million. For the year ended December 31, 2005, our net loss was $15.094 million, which includes a net gain of $10.125 million from sales of securities available for sale and a loss of $10.407 million from derivative valuations and an operating loss of $15.098 million. We expect to continue incurring net losses from operations until we can produce sufficient revenues to cover costs. In order to achieve profitability, we must successfully achieve all or some combination of the following:

Furthermore, we anticipate that we will continue to incur losses until we can produce and sell our fuel cell systems on a large-scale and cost-effective basis. Even if we do achieve profitability, we may be unable to sustain or increase our profitability in the future. Failure to do so will have a material adverse effect on our business plans, prospects, results of operations and financial condition.

Our competitors may develop a more cost effective, better product and bring that product to market faster than we can. If we do not create a competitive DMFC product or we are late to market, it will have a material adverse effect on our business plans, prospects, results of operations and financial condition: There are a number of other companies developing DMFCs. Some of our competitors may have better access to resources and capital than we do. Some of our competitors are much larger and have better access to manufacturing capacity, supply chains and distribution channels than we do. Some of our competitors may resolve technical or engineering issues before we do. Accordingly, one or more of our competitors may bring a mass commercial product to market before we do. In addition, one or more of our competitors may make a better or more cost effective product than we can make. Failure to get to market with the best and most cost competitive DMFC product before our competitors would have a material adverse effect on our business plans, prospects, results of operations and financial condition.

We have limited experience manufacturing fuel cell systems on a commercial basis. If we do not achieve the necessary manufacturing capabilities, it will have a material adverse effect on our business plans, prospects, results of operations and financial condition: To date, we have focused primarily on research and development and have limited experience manufacturing micro fuel cell systems on a commercial basis. We plan to manufacture our fuel cell products through third-party contract manufacturers. We can offer no assurance that either we, our contract manufacturers or any other party we partner with to volume-produce our products will develop efficient, automated, low-cost manufacturing capabilities and processes to meet the quality, price, engineering, design and production standards or production volumes required to successfully mass market our fuel cell products. Even if we or our contract manufacturers are successful in developing such manufacturing capability and processes, we do not know whether we or they will be timely in meeting our product commercialization schedule or the production and delivery requirements of potential customers. Failure to develop or procure such manufacturing capabilities will have a material adverse effect on the Company's business plans, prospects, results of operations and financial condition.

We may not be able to establish additional strategic relationships that we will need to complete our product development and commercialization plans.us. If we are unable to develop necessary strategic relationships on terms that are acceptable to us, it will have a material adverse effect on our business plans, prospects, results of operations and financial condition: We believe that we will need to enter into additional strategic relationships in order to complete our current product development and commercialization plans on schedule. If we are unable to identify or enter into a satisfactory agreement with potential partners,raise adequate funds, we may not be ablehave to

17

complete liquidate some or all of our product development and commercialization plans on scheduleassets or at all, which would have a material adverse effect on our business plans, prospects, results of operations and financial condition. We may also need to scale back these plans in the

absence of a partner, which would materially adversely affect our future business plans, prospects, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, any arrangement with a strategic partner may require us to issue a material amount of equity securities to the partner or commit significant financial resources to fund our product development efforts in exchange for their assistance or the contribution to us of intellectual property. Any such issuance of equity securities woulddelay, reduce the percentage ownershipscope of or eliminate some or all of our then current shareholders, which would have a material adverse effect on our business plans, prospects, results of operationsresearch and financial condition.

We will rely on our partners to develop and provide components for our Mobion® fuel cell systems. If our partners do not meet our quality, quantity, reliability or schedule requirements, it will have a material adverse effect on our business plans, prospects, results of operations and financial condition: We depend on third parties to supply many of the components of our Mobion® fuel cell systems. A supplier's failure to develop and supply components in a timely manner, or to develop or supply components that meet our quality, quantity or cost requirements, or our inability to obtain substitute sources of these components on a timely basis or on terms acceptable to us, would harm our ability to manufacture our fuel cell systems. In addition, to the extent that our supply partners use technology or manufacturing processes that are proprietary, we may be unable to obtain comparable components fr om alternative sources. Failure to do so will have a material adverse effect on our business plan, prospects, results of operations and financial condition.development programs.

In addition, platinum is a key material in our micro fuel cells. Platinum is a scarce natural resource and we are depending upon a sufficient supply of this commodity. While we do not anticipate significant near or long-term shortages in the supply of platinum, any such shortages would adversely affect our ability to produce commercially viable fuel cell systems or significantly raise our cost of producing our fuel cell systems.

Our inability to deliver a commercially viable Mobion®fuel cell on time, or at all, will have a material adverse effect on our business plans, prospects, results of operations and financial condition: We anticipate having field test ready military application Mobion®fuel cell product available for sale by the end of 2006. There may be technical or engineering challenges we have not anticipated, issues of reliability for our device, an inability for our device to be integrated into existing electronic devices, difficulties in obtaining materials or components, or problems with manufacturing or distribution, and many other problems that we have not, and perhaps could not anticipate. All of these issues could delay or prohibit further releases of additional Mobion®fuel cell products, which would have a material adverse effect on our business plans, prospects, results of operations and financial condition.

Failure to achieve future product development and the timing associated with entry into the military, industrial or consumer market or commercialization milestones will have a material adverse effect on our business plans, prospects, results of operations and financial condition: We have established aggressive product development and commercialization milestones and dates for achieving development goals related to technology and design improvements. We use these milestones to assess our progress toward developing commercially viable fuel cell systems. Delays in our product development will likely have a material impact on our commercialization schedule. If we experience delays in meeting our development goals or if our micro fuel cell systems exhibit technical defects or if we are unable to meet cost, performance or manufacturing goals, including power output, useful life and reliability, our commercialization schedule will be delayed. In this event, potential purchasers of our initial comme rcial systems may choose alternative technologies and any delays could allow potential competitors to gain market advantages. We cannot assure that we will successfully achieve our milestones in the future and the failure to achieve such milestones would have a material adverse effect on our business plans, prospects, results of operations and financial condition.

Our resources available to fund operations may fluctuate as the value of Plug Power's share price fluctuates. Such price fluctuations could result in our requiring additional funding sooner than anticipated: A primary asset of the Companyour company is the Plug Power common stock we own. As of December 31, 2007, we owned 1,137,166 shares of Plug Power common stock it owns. As of December 31, 2005, the Company owned 3,693,436 shares ofstock. Plug Power common stock in Plug Power, which is a publicly traded company.on The Nasdaq Global Market. The market price of the Plug Power common stock may fluctuate due toas a result of market conditions and other conditionsfactors over which the Company haswe have no control. Fluctuations in the market price of Plug Power'sPower’s common stock may result in a reduction of resources available to fund operations, which could result in our requiring additional funding sooner than anticipated.

If wecurrent U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, and certain international regulations do not change, passengers will be unable to carry methanol in the passenger compartments of airplanes, which would adversely affect our sales and results of operations.

Current airline and Federal Aviation Administration regulations and certain international laws, regulations, and treaties limit the amount and concentration of methanol that any passenger can carry onboard passenger planes. We believe that these regulations must change for mass commercialization of Mobion technology products to be possible. The implementation by the U.S. Department of Transportation, the Federal Aviation Administration, and other similar international bodies of regulatory changes approved by the International Civil Aviation Organization will permit direct methanol fuel cell systems and refill cartridges to be carried in the passenger compartment of airplanes. If these regulations are not successful in protecting our patents and intellectual property, it will have a material adverse effect on our business plans, prospects, results of operations and financial condition: Patent and trade secret rights are of material importance to us. No assurance can be given as to the issuance of patents or, if so issued, as to their scope. Patents granted may not provide meaningful protection from competitors. Even if a competitor's products were to infringe patents owned by usimplemented, it would be costlymaterially and adversely affect our ability to pursue an enforcement actionachieve mass commercialization of Mobion technology products and would divert funds and resources which otherwise could be used in operations. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that an enforcement action would be successful.

18

In addition to our patent rights, we also rely on treatment of our technology as trade secrets and upon confidentiality agreements. These agreements may be breached, and we may not have adequate remedies for any breach. Our inability to obtain patents, as well as to protect and enforce any patents that are issued as well as trade secrets, could have a material adverse effect on our business plans, prospects, results of operations, and financial condition.


Our inability orportable power source products may not be accepted by the market.

Any portable power source products that we develop may not achieve market acceptance. The development of a successful market for our proposed portable power source products and our ability to sell those products at favorable prices may be adversely affected by a number of factors, many of which are beyond our control, including the following:

our failure to manageproduce portable power source products that compete favorably against other products on the basis of price, quality, performance, and life;

competition from conventional lithium-ion or other rechargeable battery systems;

the ability of our technologies and product solutions to address the needs of the electronic device markets, the requirements of OEMs, and the preferences of end users;

our ability to provide OEMs with portable power source products that provide advantages in terms of size, weight, peak power, power duration, reliability, durability, performance, and value-added features compared to alternative solutions; and

our failure to develop and maintain successful relationships with OEMs, manufacturers, distributors, and others as well as strategic partners.

Target markets for our proposed portable power source products, such as those for smart phones, digital cameras, and portable media players, are volatile, cyclical, and rapidly changing and could continue to utilize existing technology or adopt other new competing technologies. The market for certain of these products depends in part upon the development and deployment of wireless and other technologies, which may or may not address the needs of users of these new products.

Many manufacturers of portable electronic devices have well-established relationships with competitive suppliers. Penetrating these markets will require us to offer better performance alternatives to existing solutions at competitive costs. The failure of any of our target markets to continue to expand, or our failure to penetrate these markets to a significant extent, will impede our sales growth. We cannot predict the growth rate of these markets or the market share we will achieve in these markets in the future.

If our proposed portable power source products fail to gain market acceptance, it could materially and adversely affect our business and financial condition.

Market acceptance of our customers’ products that utilize our portable power source products may decline or may not develop and, as a result, our sales will be harmed.

We currently do not anticipate selling our portable power source products directly to end users. Instead, we plan to produce portable power source products that our OEM customers incorporate into their products. As a result, the success of our proposed portable power source products will depend upon the widespread market acceptance of the products of our OEM customers. We will not control or influence the manufacture, promotion, distribution, or pricing of the products that incorporate our portable power source products. Instead, we will depend on our OEM customers to manufacture and distribute products incorporating our portable power source products and to generate consumer demand through their marketing and promotional activities. Even if our technologies and products successfully meet our customers’ price and performance goals, our sales would be harmed if our OEM customers do not achieve commercial success in selling their products to consumers that incorporate our portable power source products.

Any lack of adoption in the use of our portable power source products by OEM customers in the electronic device markets, the reduced demand for our OEM customers’ products, or a slowdown in their markets would adversely affect our sales.

If we fail to build and maintain relationships with our customers and do not satisfy our customers, we may lose future sales and our revenue may stagnate or decline.

Because our success depends on the widespread market acceptance of our customers’ products, we must develop and maintain our relationships with leading global OEMs of electronic devices, such as smart phones, digital cameras, and portable media players. In addition, we must identify areas of significant growth potential in other markets, establish relationships with OEMs in those markets, and assist them in developing products that use our portable power source products and technologies. Our failure to identify potential growth opportunities, particularly in new markets, or establish and maintain relationships with OEMs in those markets, would prevent our business from growing in those markets.

Our ability to meet the expectations of our customers will require us to provide portable power source products for customers on a timely and cost-effective basis and to maintain customer satisfaction with our product solutions. We must match our design and production capacity with customer demand, maintain satisfactory delivery schedules, and meet specific performance goals. If we are unable to achieve these goals for any reason, our customers could reduce their purchases from us and our sales would decline or fail to develop.

Our customer relationships also can be affected by factors affecting our customers that are unrelated to our performance. These factors can include a myriad of situations, including business reversals of customers, determinations by customers to change effectivelytheir product mix or abandon business segments, or mergers, consolidations, or acquisitions involving our customers.


We have no experience manufacturing portable power source products on a commercial scale.

To date, we have focused primarily on research, development, and pilot production, and we have no experience manufacturing any portable power source products on a commercial scale. Our pilot production efforts to date have been limited in scale. It is our intent to manufacture our portable power source products through OEM customers and third-party manufacturers. Failure to secure manufacturing capabilities could materially and adversely affect our business and financial condition.

We will rely on others for our production, and any interruptions of these arrangements could disrupt our ability to fill our customers’ orders.

We plan to rely on others for all of our production requirements for our portable power source products. The majority of this manufacturing is anticipated to be conducted in Asia by manufacturing subcontractors that also perform services for numerous other companies. We do not expect to have a guaranteed level of production capacity with any of our manufacturing subcontractors. Qualifying new manufacturing subcontractors is time consuming and might result in unforeseen manufacturing and operations problems. The loss of our relationships with our manufacturing subcontractors or assemblers or their inability to conduct their manufacturing and assembly services for us as anticipated in terms of cost, quality, and timeliness could adversely affect our ability to fill customer orders in accordance with required delivery, quality, and performance requirements. If this were to occur, the resulting decline in revenue would harm our business.

We will depend on third parties to maintain satisfactory manufacturing yields and delivery schedules, and their inability to do so could increase our costs, disrupt our supply chain, and result in our inability to deliver our portable power source products, which would adversely affect our results of operations.

We will depend on our manufacturing subcontractors to maintain high levels of productivity and satisfactory delivery schedules for our portable power source products from manufacturing and assembly facilities likely located primarily in Asia. We plan to provide our manufacturing subcontractors with rolling forecasts of our production requirements. We do not, however, anticipate having long-term agreements with any of our manufacturing subcontractors that guarantee production capacity, prices, lead times, or delivery schedules. Our manufacturing subcontractors will serve other customers, many of which will have greater production requirements than we do. As a result, our manufacturing subcontractors could determine to prioritize production capacity for other customers or reduce or eliminate deliveries to us on short notice. We may experience lower than anticipated manufacturing yields and lengthening of delivery schedules. Lower than expected manufacturing yields could increase our costs or disrupt our supply chain. We may encounter lower manufacturing yields and longer delivery schedules while commencing volume production of any new products. Any of these problems could result in our inability to deliver our product solutions in a timely manner and adversely affect our operating results.

We plan to rely on third-party suppliers for most of our manufacturing equipment.

We plan to rely on third-party suppliers for most of the manufacturing equipment necessary to produce our portable power source products. The failure of suppliers to supply manufacturing equipment in a timely manner or on commercially reasonable terms could delay our commercialization plans and otherwise disrupt our production schedules or increase our manufacturing costs. Further, our orders with certain of our suppliers may represent a very small portion of their total orders. As a result, they may not give priority to our business, leading to potential delays in or cancellation of our orders. If any single-source supplier were to fail to supply our needs on a timely basis or cease providing us with key components, we would be required to substitute suppliers. We may have difficulty identifying a substitute supplier in a timely manner and on commercially reasonable terms. If this were to occur, our business would be harmed.

Shortages of components and raw materials may delay or reduce our sales and increase our costs, thereby harming our results of operations.

The inability to obtain sufficient quantities of components and other materials, including platinum and ruthenium, necessary for the production of our portable power source products could result in reduced or delayed sales or lost orders. Any delay in or loss of sales could adversely impact our operating results. Many of the materials used in the production of our portable power source products will be available only from a limited number of foreign suppliers, particularly suppliers located in Asia. In most cases, neither we nor our manufacturing subcontractors will have long-term supply contracts with these suppliers. As a result, we will be subject to economic instability in these Asian countries as well as to increased costs, supply interruptions, and difficulties in obtaining materials. Our customers also may encounter difficulties or increased costs in obtaining the materials necessary to produce their products into which our product solutions are incorporated.

From time to time, materials and components necessary for our portable power source products or in other aspects of our customers’ products may be subject to allocation because of shortages of these materials and components. Shortages in the future could cause delayed shipments, customer dissatisfaction, and lower revenue.


We will be subject to lengthy development periods and product acceptance cycles, which can result in development and engineering costs without any future revenue.

We plan to provide portable power source solutions that are incorporated by OEMs into the products they sell. OEMs will make the determination during their product development programs whether to incorporate our portable power source solutions or pursue other alternatives. This process may require us to make significant investments of time and resources in the design of portable power source solutions well before our customers introduce their products incorporating our product solutions and before we can be sure that we will generate any significant sales to our customers or even recover our investment. During a customer’s entire product development process, we will face the risk that our portable power source products will fail to meet our customer’s technical, performance, or cost requirements or that our products will be replaced by competitive products or alternative technological solutions. Even if we complete our design process in a manner satisfactory to our customer, the customer may decide to delay or terminate its product development efforts. The occurrence of any of these events could cause sales to not materialize, to be deferred, or to be cancelled, which would adversely affect our operating results.

We will not have long-term purchase commitments from our customers, and their ability to cancel, reduce, or delay orders could reduce our revenue and increase our costs.

Customers for our portable power source products will not provide us with firm, long-term volume purchase commitments, but instead will issue purchase orders to buy a specified number of units. As a result, customers may be able to cancel purchase orders or reduce or delay orders at any time. The cancellation, delay, or reduction of customer purchase orders could result in reduced revenue, excess inventory, and unabsorbed overhead. We currently have no presence in the electronic device markets. Our success in the electronic device markets will require us to establish the value added proposition of our products to OEMs that have traditionally used other portable power solutions. All of the markets we plan to serve are subject to severe competitive pressures, rapid technological change and product obsolescence, which may increase our inventory and overhead risks, resulting in increased costs.

Variability of customer requirements resulting in cancellations, reductions, or delays may adversely affect our operating results.

We will be required to provide rapid product turnaround and respond to short lead times. A variety of conditions, both specific to individual customers and generally affecting the demand for OEMs’ products, may cause customers to cancel, reduce, or delay orders. Cancellations, reductions, or delays by a significant customer or by a group of customers could adversely affect our operating results. Customers may require rapid increases in production, which could strain our resources and reduce our margins.

If we are unable to adequately protect our intellectual property, our competitors and other third parties could produce products based on our intellectual property, which would substantially impair our ability to compete.

Our success and ability to compete depends in part upon our ability to maintain the proprietary nature of our technologies. We rely on a combination of patent, trade secret, copyright, and trademark law and license agreements, as well as nondisclosure agreements, to protect our intellectual property. These legal means, however, afford only limited protection and may not be adequate to protect our intellectual property rights. We cannot be certain that we were the first creator of inventions covered by pending patent applications or the first to file patent applications on these inventions. In addition, we cannot be sure that any of our pending patent applications will issue. The United States Patent and Trademark Office, or other foreign patent and trademark offices may deny or significantly narrow claims made under our patent applications and, even if issued, these patents may be successfully challenged, designed around, or may otherwise not provide us with any commercial protection.

We may in the future need to assert claims of infringement against third parties to protect our intellectual property. Regardless of the final outcome, any litigation to enforce our intellectual property rights in patents, copyrights, or trademarks could be highly unpredictable and result in substantial costs and diversion of resources, which could have a material and adverse effect on our business plans, prospects, results of operations and financial condition: We continue to undergo rapid change incondition. In the scope and breadthevent of an adverse judgment, a court could hold that some or all of our operations as we advanceasserted intellectual property rights are not infringed, or are invalid or unenforceable, and could award attorneys’ fees to the development of our micro fuel cell products. Such rapid change is likely to place a significant strain on our senior management team and other resources. party.

We will be required to make significant investments in our engineering, logistics, financial and management information systems and to motivate and effectively manage our employees. Our business plans, prospects, results of operations and financial condition could be harmed if we encounter difficulties in effectively managing the budgeting, forecasting and other process control issues presented by such a rapid change.

Our share price could bemay become subject to extreme price fluctuations,claims of infringement or misappropriation of the intellectual property rights of others, which could prohibit us from selling our products, require us to obtain licenses from third parties or to develop non-infringing alternatives, and shareholders could have difficulty trading shares: The markets for high technology companiessubject us to substantial monetary damages and injunctive relief.

We may receive notices from third parties that the manufacture, use, or sale of any products we develop infringes one or more claims of their patents. Moreover, because patent applications can take many years to issue, there may be currently pending applications, unknown to us, which may later result in particular have been volatile, and the market price of our common stock, which is traded on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol MKTY, has been and may continue to be subject to significant fluctuations. Fluctuations could be in response to operating results, announcements of technological innovations or new products by us, or by our competitors, patent or proprietary rights developments, and market conditions for high technology stocks in general. In addition, the stock market in recent years has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuationsissued patents that sometimes have been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of individual companies. These market fluctuations, as well as general economic conditions, may adversely affect the market price of our common stock and the ability of shareholders to dispose of o ur common stock.

General economic conditions may affect investors' expectations regarding our financial performancematerially and adversely affect our stock price, which maybusiness. Third parties could also assert infringement or misappropriation claims against us with respect to our future product offerings, if any. Whether or not such claims are valid, we cannot be certain that we have not infringed the intellectual property rights of such third parties. Any infringement or misappropriation claim could result in a material adverse effect onsignificant costs, substantial damages, and our business plans, prospects, results of operations and financial condition: Certain industries in which weinability to manufacture, market, or sell and intend to sell products, such as the energy and semiconductor industries are highly cyclical. In the future, our results may be subject to substantial period-to-period fluctuations as a consequence of the industry patternsany of our customers, generalproduct offerings that are found to infringe. Even if we were to prevail in any such action, the litigation


could result in substantial cost and diversion of resources that could materially and adversely affect our business. If a court determined, or regional economic conditions, and other factors. These factors may also have a material adverse effect onif we independently discovered, that our business plans, prospects, results of operations and financial condition.

The loss of key employees may have a material adverse effect on our business plans, prospects, results of operations and financial condition: Our success will depend, in large part, upon our ability to attract, motivate and retain highly qualified scientists and engineers, as well as highly skilled and experienced management, sales and technical personnel. Competition for these personnel is intense, andproduct offerings violated third-party proprietary rights, there can be no assurance that we willwould be successfulable to re-engineer our product offerings to avoid those rights or obtain a license under those rights on commercially reasonable terms, if at all. As a result, we could be prohibited from selling products that are found to infringe upon the rights of others. Even if obtaining a license were feasible, it may be costly and time-consuming. A court could also enter orders that temporarily, preliminarily, or permanently enjoin us from making, using, selling, offering to sell, or importing our portable power source products, or could enter orders mandating that we undertake certain remedial activities. Further, a court could order us to pay compensatory damages for such infringement, plus prejudgment interest, and could in attracting, motivatingaddition treble the compensatory damages and award attorneys’ fees. These damages could materially and adversely affect our business and financial condition.

Confidentiality agreements with employees and others may not adequately prevent disclosure of our trade secrets and other proprietary information, which could limit our ability to compete.

We rely on trade secrets to protect our proprietary technology and processes. Trade secrets are difficult to protect. We enter into confidentiality and intellectual property assignment agreements with our employees, consultants, and other advisors. These agreements generally require that the other party keep confidential and not disclose to third parties confidential information developed by the party or retaining key personnel. made known to the party by us during the course of the party’s relationship with us. However, these agreements may not be honored and enforcing a claim that a party illegally obtained and is using our trade secrets is difficult, expensive and time-consuming, and the outcome is unpredictable. The failure to obtain and maintain trade secret protection could adversely affect our competitive position.

Our efforts to develop new technologies may not result in commercial success, dependswhich could cause a decline in our revenue and could harm our business.

Our research and development efforts with respect to our technologies may not result in customer or market acceptance. Some or all of those technologies may not successfully make the transition from the research and development lab to cost-effective production as a result of technology problems, competitive cost issues, yield problems, and other factors. Even when we successfully complete a research and development effort with respect to a significant extent uponparticular technology, our customers may decide not to introduce or may terminate products utilizing the technology for a numbervariety of key employees,reasons, including membersthe following:

difficulties with other suppliers of senior management. components for the products;

superior technologies developed by our competitors and unfavorable comparisons of our solutions with these technologies;

price considerations; and

lack of anticipated or actual market demand for the products.

The lossnature of the services ofour business will require us to make continuing investments for new technologies. Significant expenses relating to one or more of these senior executives or key employees, or the inabilitynew technologies that ultimately prove to continue to attract qualified personnel, could delay product development cycles or otherwise harm our business andbe unsuccessful for any reason could have a material adverse effect on us. In addition, any investments or acquisitions made to enhance our technologies may prove to be unsuccessful. If our efforts are unsuccessful, our business plans,could be harmed.

We may not be able to enhance our product solutions and develop new product solutions in a timely manner.

Our future operating results will depend to a significant extent on our ability to provide new portable power source products that compare favorably with alternative solutions on the basis of time to introduction, cost, performance, and end-user preferences. Our success in attracting customers and developing business will depends on various factors, including the following:

innovative development of new portable power source products for customer products;

utilization of advances in technology;

maintenance of quality standards;

efficient and cost-effective solutions; and

timely completion of the design and introduction of new portable power source products.

Our inability to commercialize our proposed portable power source solutions and develop new product solutions on a timely basis could harm our operating results and impede our growth.

If we do not keep pace with technological innovations, our products may not be competitive and our revenue and operating results may suffer.

Technological advances, the introduction of new products, and new design techniques could adversely affect our business prospects unless we are able to adapt to the changing conditions. Technological advances could render our proposed portable power source products obsolete, and we may not be able to respond effectively to the technological requirements of evolving markets. As a result, we will be required to expend substantial funds for and commit significant resources to


continue research and development activities on portable power source products;

hire additional engineering and other technical personnel; and

purchase advanced design tools and test equipment.

Our business could be harmed if we are unable to develop and utilize new technologies that address the needs of our customers, or our competitors or customers do so more effectively than we do.

New technologically solutions that achieve significant market share could harm our business.

New portable power source solutions could be developed. Existing electronic devices also could be modified to allow for a different power source solution. Our business could be harmed if our products become noncompetitive as a result of a technological breakthrough that allows a new power source solution to displace our solution and achieve significant market acceptance.

Our inability to respond to changing technologies will harm our business.

The electronics industry is subject to constant technological change. Our future success will depend on our ability to respond appropriately to changing technologies and changes in product function and quality. If we rely on products and technologies that are not attractive to consumers, we may not be successful in capturing or retaining any significant market share. In addition, any new technologies utilized in our portable power source products may not perform as expected or as desired, in which event our adoption of such products or technologies may harm our business.

International sales and manufacturing risks could adversely affect our operating results.

We anticipate that the manufacturing and assembly operations for our portable power source products will be conducted primarily in Asia by manufacturing subcontractors. We also believe that many of our OEM customers will be located and much of our sales and distribution operations will be conducted in Asia. These international operations will expose us to various economic, political, and other risks that could adversely affect our operations and operating results, including the following:

difficulties and costs of staffing and managing a multi-national organization;

unexpected changes in regulatory requirements;

differing labor regulations;

potentially adverse tax consequences;

tariffs and duties and other trade barrier restrictions;

possible employee turnover or labor unrest;

greater difficulty in collecting accounts receivable;

the burdens and costs of compliance with a variety of foreign laws;

potentially reduced protection for intellectual property rights; and

political or economic instability in certain parts of the world.

The risks associated with international operations could negatively affect our operating results.

Our business may suffer if international trade is hindered, disrupted, or economically disadvantaged.

Political and economic conditions abroad may adversely affect the foreign production and sale of our portable power source products. Protectionist trade legislation in either the United States or foreign countries, such as a change in the current tariff structures, export or import compliance laws, or other trade policies, could adversely affect our ability to sell our portable power source products in foreign markets and to obtain materials or equipment from foreign suppliers.

Changes in policies by the U.S. or foreign governments resulting in, among other things, higher taxation, currency conversion limitations, restrictions on the transfer of funds, or the expropriation of private enterprises also could have a material adverse effect on us. Any actions by countries in which we conduct business to reverse policies that encourage foreign investment or foreign trade also could adversely affect our operating results. In addition, U.S. trade policies, such as “most favored nation” status and trade preferences for certain Asian nations could affect the attractiveness of our products to our U.S. customers and adversely impact our operating results.

Our operating results could be adversely affected by fluctuations in the value of the U.S. dollar against foreign currencies.

We plan to transact our portable power source business predominantly in U.S. dollars and bill and collect our sales in U.S. dollars. A weakening of the dollar could cause our overseas vendors to require renegotiation of either the prices or currency we pay for their goods and services. In the future, customers may negotiate pricing and make payments in non-U.S. currencies.


If our overseas vendors or customers require us to transact business in non-U.S. currencies, fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates could affect our cost of goods, operating expenses, and operating margins and could result in exchange losses. In addition, currency devaluation can result in a loss to us if we hold deposits of that currency. Hedging foreign currencies can be difficult, especially if the currency is not freely traded. We cannot predict the impact of future exchange rate fluctuations on our operating results.

We expect that a majority of our manufacturing subcontractors will be located in Asia, increasing the risk that a natural disaster, labor strike, war, or political unrest in those countries would disrupt our operations.

We expect that a majority of our manufacturing subcontractors will be located in Asia. Events out of our control, such as earthquakes, fires, floods, or other natural disasters, or political unrest, war, labor strikes, or work stoppages in Asia could disrupt their operations, which would impact our business. In addition, there is political tension between Taiwan and China that could lead to hostilities. If any of these events occur, we may not be able to obtain alternative manufacturing capacity. Failure to secure alternative manufacturing capacity could cause a delay in the shipment of our products, which would cause our revenue to fluctuate or decline.

Continuing uncertainty of the U.S. economy may have serious implications for the growth and stability of our business and may negatively affect our stock price.

The revenue growth and profitability of our business will depend significantly on the overall demand for electronic devices. Softening demand in these markets caused by ongoing economic uncertainty may result in decreased revenue or earnings levels or growth rates. The U.S. economy has been historically cyclical, and market conditions continue to be challenging, which has resulted in individuals and companies delaying or reducing expenditures. Further delays or reductions in spending could have a material adverse effect on demand for our products, and consequently on our business, financial condition, results of operations, prospects, and stock price.

The electronics industry is cyclical and may result in fluctuations in our operating results.

The electronics industry has experienced significant economic downturns at various times. These downturns are characterized by diminished product demand, accelerated erosion of average selling prices, and production overcapacity. In addition, the electronics industry is cyclical in nature. We will seek to reduce our exposure to industry downturns and cyclicality by providing design and production services for leading companies in rapidly expanding industry segments. We may, however, experience substantial period-to-period fluctuations in future operating results because of general industry conditions or events occurring in the general economy.

Our strategic alliances may not achieve their objectives, and their failure to do so could impede our growth.

Our prospectus depends to a significant extent on our strategic allowances with Samsung and Gillette. In addition, we plan to explore additional strategic alliances designed to enhance or complement our technology or to work in conjunction with our technology; to provide necessary know-how, components, or supplies; and to develop, introduce, and distribute products utilizing our technology. Any strategic alliances may not achieve their intended objectives, may be cancelled by either party, and parties to our strategic alliances may not perform as contemplated. The failure of these alliances may impede our ability to introduce new products and enter new markets.

Product liability claims against us could result in adverse publicity and potentially significant monetary damages.

As a seller of consumer products using a flammable material such as methanol, we will face an inherent risk of exposure to product liability claims in the event injuries from product usage by customers. It is possible that our products could result in injury, whether by product malfunctions, defects, improper installation, or other causes. If such injuries or claims of injuries were to occur, we could incur monetary damages and our business could be adversely affected by any resulting negative publicity. The successful assertion of product liability claims against us could result in potentially significant monetary damages and, if our insurance protection is inadequate to cover these claims, could require us to make significant payments from our own resources.

We expect to face intense competition that could result in failing to gain market share and suffering reduced revenue from our portable power source products.

We plan to serve intensely competitive markets that are characterized by price erosion, rapid technological change, and competition from major domestic and international companies. This intense competition could result in pricing pressures, lower sales, reduced margins, and lower market share. Most of our competitors have greater market recognition, larger customer bases, and substantially greater financial, condition.technical, marketing, distribution, and other resources than we possess and that afford them competitive advantages. As a result, they may be able to devote greater resources to the promotion and sale of products, to negotiate lower prices for raw materials and components, to deliver competitive products at lower prices, and to introduce new product solutions and

Item 1B: Unresolved Staff Comments


respond to customer requirements more quickly than we can. Our competitive position could suffer if one or more of our customers determine not to utilize our portable power source products and instead decide to contract with our competitors or to use alternative technologies.

None.Our ability to compete successfully will depend on a number of factors, both within and outside our control. These factors include the following:

our success in designing and introducing new portable power source products;

our ability to predict the evolving needs of our customers and to assist them in incorporating our technologies into their new products;

our ability to meet our customer’s requirements for small size, low weight, peak power, long power duration, ease of use, reliability, durability, and small form factor;

the quality of our customer services;

the rate at which customers incorporate our products into their own products;

product or technology introductions by our competitors; and

foreign currency fluctuations, which may cause a foreign competitor’s products to be priced significantly lower than our products.

We depend on key personnel who would be difficult to replace, and our business will likely be harmed if we lose their services or cannot hire additional qualified personnel.

Our success will depend substantially on the efforts and abilities of our senior management and key personnel. The competition for qualified management and key personnel, especially engineers, is intense. Although we maintain noncompetition and nondisclosure covenants with most of our key personnel, we do not have employment agreements with most of them. The loss of services of one or more of our key employees or the inability to hire, train, and retain key personnel, especially engineers and technical support personnel, and capable sales and customer-support employees outside the United States, could delay the development and sale of our products, disrupt our business, and interfere with our ability to execute our business plan.

Our operating results may experience significant fluctuations.

In addition to the variability resulting from the short-term nature of our customers’ commitments, other factors will contribute to significant periodic and seasonal quarterly fluctuations in our results of operations. These factors include the following:

the cyclicality of the markets we serve;

the timing and size of orders;

the volume of orders relative to our capacity;

product introductions and market acceptance of new products or new generations of products;

evolution in the life cycles of our customers’ products;

timing of expenses in anticipation of future orders;

changes in product mix;

availability of manufacturing and assembly services;

changes in cost and availability of labor and components;

timely delivery of product solutions to customers;

pricing and availability of competitive products;

introduction of new technologies into the markets we serve;

pressures on reducing selling prices;

our success in serving new markets; and

changes in economic conditions.

Accordingly, you should not rely on period-to-period comparisons as an indicator of our future performance. Negative or unanticipated fluctuations in our operating results may result in a decline in the price of our stock.


Item 2: Properties

The Company leases

We lease office, manufacturing and research and development space in the following locations:

Approximate Number Of

Location

Segment

Primary Use

Square Feet

Lease Expiration

Albany, NY

Test and Measurement

Manufacturing, office and sales

20,700

2009

Instrumentation

Albany, NY

New Energy and Other

Corporate headquarters, office and

23,500

2006

research and development

Alexandria, VA

New Energy

Office

186

2006

Los Gatos, CA*

New Energy

Office

1,568

2007

Location

Segment

Primary Use

Approximate Number of

Square Feet

Lease Expiration

 

 

 

 

 

Albany, NY

Test and Measurement

Instrumentation

Manufacturing, office and sales

20,700

2009

Albany, NY

New Energy

Corporate headquarters, office and

research and development

23,500

2009

*The Company closed the California office as of December 31, 2005 and vacated this facility. Effective as of January 31, 2006, we have terminated this lease.

In management's opinion, theWe believe our facilities are generally well maintained and adequate for our current needs and for expansion, if required. We further believe that a lease renewal on reasonable terms for these properties may be achieved.

19

Item 3: Legal Proceedings

At any point in time, the Company and its subsidiarieswe may be involved in various lawsuits or other legal proceedings. Such lawsuits could arise from the sale of products or services or from other matters relating to its regular business activities, compliance with various governmental regulations and requirements, or other transactions or circumstances. The Company doesWe do not believe there are any such proceedings presently pending which could have a material adverse effect on the Company'sour financial condition.

Lawrence

On September 9, 1998, Barbara Lawrence, the Lawrence Group, Inc. ("Lawrence") and certain other Lawrence-related entities ("Plaintiffs") initially filed suit in the Bankruptcy Court and the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York which were subsequently consolidated in the District Court, against First Albany Corporation ("FAC"), MTI, Dale Church, Edward Dohring, Beno Sternlicht, Alan Goldberg and George McNamee (Sternlicht, Goldberg and McNamee are former Directors of the Company), Marty Mastroianni (former President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company), and 33 other individuals ("Defendants") who purchased a total of 820,909 (2,462,727 shares post split) shares of the Company's stock from the Plaintiffs. The case concerns the Defendants' 1997 purchase of MTI shares from the Plaintiffs at the price of $2.25 per share ($0.75 per share post split). FAC acted as Placement Agent for the Defendants in the negotiation and sale of th e shares and in proceedings before the Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of New York, which approved the sale in September 1997.

Plaintiffs claim that the Defendants failed to disclose material inside information concerning Plug Power, LLC to the Plaintiffs and therefore the $2.25 per share ($0.75 per share post split) purchase price was unfair. Plaintiffs are seeking damages of $5 million plus punitive damages and costs. In April 1999, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint, which was denied by the Bankruptcy Court. On appeal in October 2000, Plaintiffs' cause of action was dismissed by the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York. In November 2000, Plaintiffs filed an appeal of that dismissal with the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. In June 2002, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the District Court decision and remanded the case for further consideration of the Plaintiff's claims as motions to modify the Bankruptcy Court sale order. The Plaintiff's claims have now been referred back to Bankruptcy Court for such consideration. In September 2003, th e Bankruptcy Court issued an order permitting Plaintiffs to conduct limited discovery concerning how First Albany formed an opinion about the Company's stock up until the date the Stock Purchase Agreement was executed. Discovery has commenced.

The Company believes the claims have no merit and intends to defend them vigorously.The Company cannot predict theoutcome of the claims nor reasonably estimate a range of possible loss given the current status of the litigation. Accordingly, no amounts have been reserved for this matter.

Item 4: Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

There were no matters submitted to a vote of the registrant'sour security holders during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005.

2007.

 


20

PART II

Item 5: Market for Registrant'sRegistrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Price Range of Common Stock

MTIOur common stock is traded on theThe Nasdaq NationalGlobal Market under the symbol MKTY.“MKTY”. The following table sets forth the high and low last reported sale prices forof our common stock as reported by the Nasdaq National Market for the periods indicated:

Year Ended December 31, 2005

High

Low

First Quarter

$6.30

$4.27

Second Quarter

4.58

3.09

Third Quarter

4.21

2.25

Fourth Quarter

4.00

2.55

Year Ended December 31, 2004

High

Low

First Quarter

$7.97

$4.86

Second Quarter

6.88

4.89

Third Quarter

6.19

2.92

Fourth Quarter

6.50

3.88

   

Number of Equity Security Holders

As of February 28, 2006, the Company had approximately 555 holders of our common stock. However, management believes that a significant number of shares are held by brokers under a "nominee name" and that the number of beneficial shareholders of our common stock is approximately 15,000.

Dividends

The payment of dividends is within the discretion of the Company's Board of Directors and will depend, among other factors, on earnings, capital requirements, and the operating and financial condition of the Company. The Company has never paid and does not anticipate paying dividends in the foreseeable future.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

None.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

None.

21

 

 

 

High

 

 

Low

Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2006

 

 

 

 

 

 

First Quarter

 

$

3.90

 

$

2.70

Second Quarter

 

 

5.00

 

 

2.00

Third Quarter

 

 

2.49

 

 

1.27

Fourth Quarter

 

 

2.96

 

 

1.55

Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2007

 

 

 

 

 

 

First Quarter

 

$

1.93

 

$

1.32

Second Quarter

 

 

1.80

 

 

1.20

Third Quarter

 

 

1.41

 

 

0.90

Fourth Quarter

 

 

1.35

 

 

0.72

Item 6: Selected Financial Data

The following tablestable sets forth our summary consolidated financial data for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2005, 2006, and 2007, which was derived from our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We derived our summary consolidated financial data for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2004 set forth selectedin the following table from our audited consolidated financial statement not included in this report. You should read the following summary consolidated financial data and other operating information of the Company. The selected statement of operations and balance sheet data for 2005, 2004, 2003, 2002 and 2001 as set for below are derived from the audited financial statements of the Company. The information is only a summary and you should read it in conjunctiontogether with the Company's audited financial statements and related notes and other financial information included herein and "Management'sunder “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations."Operations” and our consolidated financial statements, including the related notes thereto.

Three

(In thousands, except per share data)

Year

Year

Year

Year

Months

Year

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

Ended

Ended

Ended

Ended

Dec. 31,

Dec. 31,

Dec. 31,

Dec. 31,

Sept. 30,

 

2003

 

2004

 

2005

 

2006

 

2007

 

Statement of Operations Data

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Product revenue

$ 6,012

$ 7,530

$ 5,547

$ 5,362

$1,246

$ 7,298

 

$

5,547

 

$

7,530

 

$

6,012

 

$

7,667

 

$

9,028

 

Funded research and development revenue

1,829

1,040

2,311

1,573

90

-

 

 

2,311

 

 

1,040

 

 

1,829

 

 

489

 

 

1,556

 

(Loss) gain on derivatives

(10,407)

614

(6)

(188)

(26)

(1,266)

Gain (loss) on derivatives

 

 

(6

)

 

614

 

 

(10,407

)

 

182

 

 

2,967

 

Net gain (loss) on sale of securities available for sale

10,125

3,626

7,483

(444)

-

 

 

7,483

 

 

3,626

 

 

10,125

 

 

4,289

 

 

2,549

 

Net gain on sale of holdings

-

-

-

6,369

-

28,838

Gain on exchange of securities

-

-

-

8,006

-

(Loss) income from continuing operations before income

    

taxes, equity in holdings' losses and minority interests

(14,949)

(9,121)

(1,731)

906

(17,161)

20,736

(Loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes, equity in holdings’ losses and minority interest

 

 

(1,731

)

 

(9,121

)

 

(14,949

)

 

(12,980

)

 

(7,609

)

Income tax (expense) benefit

(1,587)

3,564

669

(367)

6,788

(7,524)

 

 

669

 

 

3,564

 

 

(1,587

)

 

(1,895

)

 

(2,548

)

Minority interests in losses of consolidated subsidiary

1,442

1,366

490

418

104

123

 

 

490

 

 

1,366

 

 

1,442

 

 

1,208

 

 

582

 

Loss from continuing operations

(15,094)

(4,191)

(572)

(7,186)

(13,585)

(3,737)

 

 

(572

)

 

(4,191

)

 

(15,094

)

 

(13,667

)

 

(9,575

)

Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes

-

-

13

225

-

 

 

13

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cumulative effect of accounting change for derivative

    

financial instruments for Company's own stock,

    

net of tax

-

-

-

-

1,468

Cumulative effect of accounting change for derivative

financial instruments, net of tax

-

-

-

-

6,110

Net (loss) income

$ (15,094)

$ (4,191)

$ (559)

$(6,961)

$(13,585)

$ 3,841

 

$

(559

)

$

(4,191

)

$

(15,094

)

$

(13,667

)

$

(9,575

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic and Diluted (Loss) Earnings Per Share

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loss from continuing operations

$ (0.49)

$ (0.14)

$ (0.02)

$ (0.21)

$ (0.38)

$ (0.10)

 

$

(0.02

)

$

(0.14

)

$

(0.49

)

$

(0.43

)

$

(0.25

)

Income from discontinued operations

-

-

-

0.01

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cumulative effect of accounting change for derivative

    

financial instruments for Company's own stock

-

-

-

-

.04

Cumulative effect of accounting change for derivative

    

financial instruments

-

-

-

-

.17

(Loss) earnings per share

$ (0.49)

$ (0.14)

$ (0.02)

$ (0.20)

$ (0.38)

$ 0.11

 

$

(0.02

)

$

(0.14

)

$

(0.49

)

$

(0.43

)

$

(0.25

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance Sheet Data (as of period end):

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Working capital

$ 24,465

$ 34,812

$42,426

$ 36,681

$ 11,909

$ 13,833

 

$

42,426

 

$

34,812

 

$

24,465

 

$

20,820

 

$

11,347

 

Securities available for sale

18,947

17,678

44,031

37,332

5,734

6,704

 

 

44,031

 

 

17,678

 

 

18,947

 

 

10,075

 

 

4,492

 

Securities available for sale - restricted

-

16,497

-

-

Holdings, at equity

-

-

-

-

38,937

47,197

Securities available for sale – restricted

 

 

 

 

16,497

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total assets

41,267

66,830

65,838

52,384

56,348

71,257

 

 

65,838

 

 

66,830

 

 

41,267

 

 

33,811

 

 

18,716

 

Total long-term obligations

-

1,149

24

24

4,406

8,453

 

 

24

 

 

1,149

 

 

 

 

3,664

 

 

904

 

Total shareholders' equity

32,916

55,584

48,266

40,748

47,608

54,047

Total stockholders' equity

 

 

48,266

 

 

55,584

 

 

32,916

 

 

22,871

 

 

13,803

 

 

22


Item 7: Management'sManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our accompanyingConsolidated Financial Statements and Notes theretothe related notes included withinelsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. In addition to historical information, this Annual Report on Form 10-K and the followingReport. This discussion contain statements that are not historical facts and are considered forward-looking within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Act of 1995. Certain statements made in this document that state Management's intentions, hopes, goals, beliefs, expectations, projections, plans, anticipation, outlook or predictions of the future are forward looking statements. Such statements include, among others, estimates of cash needs and sources; our ability to meet cash needs in the future; MTI Micro's plans under its strategic alliance agreement with its fuel refill partner; future prospects and applications for fuel cell systems; MTI's, MTI Micro's and MTI Instruments' future business prospects, technology and performance; the market po tential for and progress MTI Micro is making in developing its Mobion fuel cells; the significance of any contracts, grants, awards, or other recognition that MTI Micro may receive; the timing or success of market entry, in either the vertical or horizontal markets, by MTI Micro; MTI Micro's ability to meet its stated milestones on time, if at all; MTI, MTI Micro's and MTI Instruments' ability to increase or maintain sales into military and other governmental markets; the importance of any relationships we may have, and our ability to maintain those relationships going forward; MTI Micro's ability to produce products or prototypes consistent with any announced specifications or customer requirements, if at all; MTI Micro's ability to remain a leader in advancing codes and standards; and the importance of any patents or codes and standards. Allcontains forward-looking statements, are made as of today,which involve risk and MTI disclaims any duty to update such statements. It is important to note that the Company'suncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those projectedanticipated in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause the anticipated results not to occur include, among others, risks related to financing; uncertainties in development, manufacturing, competition and consumer demand for DMFCs; Gillette's ability to terminate its agreements with MTI Micro prior to commercializationstatements as a result of DMFCs; and the riskcertain factors, listedincluding those discussed in Item 1A: Risk Factors.

“Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Annual Report.

Overview

Mechanical Technology Incorporated, ("MTI" or the "Company"), a New York corporation, was incorporated in 1961. MTI operates in two segments, the New Energy segment which is conducted through MTI MicroFuel Cells Inc. ("MTI Micro"), a majority-owned subsidiary,Overview

We are developing and the Test and Measurement Instrumentation segment, which is conducted through MTI Instruments, Inc. ("MTI Instruments"), a wholly owned subsidiary.

At its MTI Micro subsidiary, the Company is primarily focused on the development and commercialization of advanced cord-freecommercializing off-the-grid rechargeable power pack technologysources for portable electronics. MTI Micro hasWe have developed a patented, proprietary direct methanol fuel cell ("DMFC") technology platform called Mobion,®, which generates electrical power using up to 100% methanol as fuel. MTI Micro'sOur proprietary fuel cell power solution consists of two primary components integrated in an easily manufactured device: the direct methanol fuel cell power engine, which we refer to as our Mobion® Chip, and methanol replacement cartridges. Our Mobion Chip weighs less than one ounce and is small enough to fit in the palm of one’s hand. The methanol used by the technology is intendedfully biodegradable. We are currently the only micro fuel cell developer to replacehave demonstrated power density of over 50 mW/cm2 with high energy efficiencies of 1.4 Wh/cc of methanol. For these reasons, we believe our technology offers a compelling alternative to current Lithium-Ionlithium-ion and similar rechargeable battery systems currently used by original equipment manufacturers (OEMs)and branded partners, or OEMs, in many hand heldhandheld electronic devices, such as mobile phones (including smart phones) and mobile phone accessories, digital cameras, portable media players, personal digital assistants, or PDAs, Smartphones and global positioning systems, or GPS devices. We believe our platform will facilitate the development of numerous product advantages, including small size, environmental friendliness, and simplicity of design, all critical for commercialization in the consumer market, and can be implemented as three different accessories.product options: a compact external charging device, a snap-on or attached power accessory, or a lithium-ion battery replacement embedded fuel cell power solution. We intend to commercialize the Mobion platform in 2009.

Our Mobion technology eliminates the need for active water recirculation pumps or the inclusion of water as a fuel dilutant. The Company believes that when commercialized,water required for the electrochemical process is transferred internally within the Mobion® could eventually have higher energy density and therefore provide multiple times Chip from the benefitssite of existing Lithium-Ion batteries. When and if Mobion®fuel cells are ready to be sold in mass-commercial markets, they should be able to power a wireless electronic device for lon ger periodswater generation on the air-side of time than Lithium Ion batteries without recharging/refueling, and be instantly refueledthe cell. This internal flow of water takes place without the need for any pumps, complicated re-circulation loops or other micro-plumbing tools. Our Mobion technology is protected by a patent portfolio that includes over 90 U.S. patent applications covering five key technologies and manufacturing areas. Our goal is to become a leading provider of portable power outlet or a lengthy recharge.(See Item 1: Business, New Energy Segment.)for handheld electronic devices.

At its MTI Instruments subsidiary, the Company designs, manufactures,We also design, manufacture, and sellssell high-performance test and measurement instruments and systems. MTI Instruments was incorporated as a subsidiary on March 8, 2000 and operatessystems serving three product groups:markets: general dimensional gaging,gauging, semiconductor, and aviation. These products consist ofof: electronic, computerized gaginggauging instruments for position, displacement and vibration applications withinfor the design, manufacturing and test markets; semiconductor products for wafer characterization of semi-insulating and semi-conducting wafers within the semiconductor market;characterization; and engine balancing and vibration analysis systems for both military and commercial aircraft.(See Item 1: Business, Test and Measurement Instrumentation Segment)

MTI also co-founded and retains a minority interest in Plug Power Inc. ("Plug Power") (Nasdaq: PLUG), a developer of clean, reliable, on-site energy products.

Our cash requirements depend on numerous factors, including completion of our productportable power source products development activities, our ability to commercialize our systems,portable power source products, market acceptance of our systemsportable power source products, and other factors. We expect to pursue the expansion of our operations through internal growth and strategic partnerships.

 

23

Several key indicators of our liquidity are summarized in the following table:

(Dollars in thousands)

Years ended December 31,

 

2005

2004

2003

Unrestricted cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities

$30,177

$40,223

$56,411

Working capital

24,465

34,812

42,426

Net loss

(15,094)

(4,191)

(559)

Net cash used in operating activities

(12,572)

(11,982)

(7,652)

Purchase of property, plant and equipment

(1,004)

(1,834)

(1,070)

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Years ended December 31,

 

 

 

2005

 

2006

 

2007

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

11,230

 

$

14,545

 

$

7,650

 

Securities available for sale

 

 

18,947

 

 

10,075

 

 

4,492

 

Working capital

 

 

24,465

 

 

20,820

 

 

11,347

 

Net loss

 

 

(15,094

)

 

(13,667

)

 

(9,575

)

Net cash used in operating activities

 

 

(12,572

)

 

(12,706

)

 

(11,683

)

Purchase of property, plant and equipment

 

 

(1,004

)

 

(1,574

)

 

(414

)

From inception through December 31, 2005, the Company has2007, we have incurred net lossesan accumulated deficit of $81.718$105.1 million and expectswe expect to incur losses for the foreseeable future as it continueswe continue micro fuel cell product development and commercialization programs. The Company expectsWe expect that losses will fluctuate from year to year and that such fluctuations may be substantial as a result of, among other factors, sales of securities available for sale andas well as the operating results of our businesses.


Results of Operations

Results of Operations for the Year Ended December 31, 2007 Compared to December 31, 2006.

Product Revenue:Product revenue in our test and measurement instrumentation business for 2007 increased by $1.4 million, or 17.8%, to $9.0 million for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 from $7.7 million for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006. This performance was primarily the result of a $602,000 increase in activity by the U.S. Air Force, driven by the New PBS-4100 systems contract. Also contributing were increased purchases by our Japanese distributor (particularly OEM capacitance), as well as increased volume in semiconductor product shipments. Total product revenue for general dimensional gauging products increased by $298,000, or 7.2%, to $4.5 million, while total product revenue for semiconductor products increased by $364,000, or 71.2%, to $875,000.

In our test and measurement instrumentation business during 2007, the U.S. Air Force accounted for $2.4 million, or 26.3%, of product revenue while during 2006, the U.S. Air Force accounted for $1.8 million, or 23.1%, of product revenue. Additionally, during 2007, Koyo Precision, our Japanese distributor, represented $2.5 million, or 27.7%, of product revenue while during 2006, Koyo Precision represented $1.8 million, or 22.9%, of product revenue.

Information regarding government contracts included in product revenue is as follows:

(Dollars in thousands)

 

 

Revenue

Year Ended December 31,

 

Revenue

Contract to Date

 

Total Contract

Orders Received

to Date

 

Contract(1)

Expiration

 

2006

 

 

2007

 

Dec. 31, 2007

 

Dec. 31, 2007

 

$2.3 million Air Force New PBS-4100 Systems

07/28/2010 (2)

$

 

$

1,596

 

$

1,596

 

$

1,596

 

$8.8 million Air Force Retrofit and Maintenance of PBS-4100 Systems

05/19/2008 (3)

$

1,417

 

$

738

 

$

7,365

 

$

7,365

 

__________________________________________________________________________________________

(1)

Contract values represent maximum potential values and may not be representative of actual results.

(2)

Date represents expiration of contract, including all three potential option extensions.

(3)

Expiration date was extended during December 2007 from December 20, 2007 to May 19, 2008.

Funded Research and Development Revenue:Funded research and development revenue in our new energy business during 2007 increased by $1.1 million, or 218.2%, to $1.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 from $489,000 for the year ended December 31, 2006. The increase in revenue was primarily the result of billings under the DOE contract, which had its funding reinstated during May 2007 after it had been suspended during 2006. This DOE funding resumption contributed an additional $613,000 to revenue during 2007. Revenue during 2007 also included $418,000 from the SAFT contract, for which revenue recognition had been deferred until the delivery under the contract was accepted during the first quarter of 2007. Revenue recognized under the Samsung alliance agreement increased by $21,000 during 2007 over 2006.

(Dollars in thousands)

 

 

Revenue Year Ended

December 31, 2006

Revenue Year Ended

December 31, 2007

 

Revenue

Contract to Date

Contract

Expiration (1)

 

Revenue

 

Percent

Revenue

 

Percent

 

Dec. 31, 2007

$3.0 million DOE(2)

09/30/08

 

$

62

 

12.7

%

$

675

 

43.4

%

$

1,846

$1.0 million Samsung(3)

07/31/07

 

 

427

 

87.3

 

 

448

 

28.8

 

 

875

$418,000 SAFT(4)

12/31/06

 

 

 

 

 

418

 

26.9

 

 

418

$15,000 NCMS(5)

06/30/07

 

 

 

 

 

15

 

0.9

 

 

15

Total

 

 

$

489

 

100.0

%

$

1,556

 

100.0

%

$

3,154

__________________________________________________________________________________________

(1)

Dates represent expiration of contract, not date of final billing.

(2)

The DOE contract is a cost share contract. DOE funding for this contract was suspended during January 2006 and reinstated during May 2007. During 2007, we received notifications from the DOE of funding releases totaling $1.0 million and also received an extension of the termination date for the contract from July 31, 2007 to September 30, 2008. During February 2008, we received notification from the DOE of a funding release of $500,000

(3)

The Samsung contract is a research and prototype contract. This contract included one up-front payment of $750,000 and two milestone payments of $125,000 each for the delivery of prototypes. The contract was amended on October 22, 2007 as we agreed to issue a credit in the amount of the last invoice in recognition of our continuing collaboration with Samsung. Therefore, revenue under this contract totaled $875,000.

(4)

The SAFT contract is a fixed price contract. This is a subcontract with SAFT under the U.S. Army CECOM contract. The purchase order received in connection with this subcontract was revised on November 14, 2006 eliminating one milestone. As a result, the contract value was reduced from $470,000 to $418,000 and the expiration date was extended from September 30, 2006 to December 31, 2006.

(5)

This contract was a cost plus catalyst research contract with the National Center for Manufacturing Sciences, or NCMS.


Cost of Product Revenue:Cost of product revenue in our test and measurement instrumentation business increased by $530,000, or 18.3%, to $3.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2007 from $2.9 million during the year ended December 31, 2006. As a percentage of product revenue, the annual cost of product revenue remained relatively consistent with 2006, and this increase was consistent with the higher revenue during 2007.

Gross profit as a percentage of product revenue decreased by 0.2% to 62.0% for the year ended December 31, 2007, remaining relatively consistent with 2006.

Funded Research and Product Development Expenses:Funded research and development expenses in our new energy business increased $739,000, or 64.1%, to $1.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 from $1.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2006. While the active contracts were relatively consistent between periods, costs for the DOE contract increased $1.3 million, reflecting its reinstatement during May 2007, while costs for the Samsung contract increased by $22,000. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in costs for the SAFT contract of $576,000, as that contract was completed during the first quarter of 2007.

Unfunded Research and Product Development Expenses:Unfunded research and product development expenses decreased $1.9 million, or 16.1%, to $9.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 from $11.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2006. This decrease reflects a $2.2 million decrease in development costs related to (a) the DOE contract that resumed during May 2007, which related increase is reflected in funded research and product development expenses, and (b) cost savings from the decision to suspend work on our high power program during March 2007. This decrease was partially offset by a $317,000 increase in product development expenses in our test and measurement instrumentation business reflecting increased staffing and external product development costs focused on the development of the division’s new stand-alone measurement and data acquisition solution, stand-alone laser head, as well as other precision measurement solutions.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses:Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased by $1.3 million, or 13.2%, to $8.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 from $10.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2006. This decrease was primarily the result of (a) a $387,000 decrease in non-cash stock-based compensation charges reflecting the difference between sign on and promotion grants during 2006 compared with primarily annual compensation grants during 2007 and the reversal of expense during 2007 related to certain cancelled executive stock-based performance grants where performance goals were not met, (b) a $528,000 decrease in outside services, including audit, legal, and consulting fees, (c) a $345,000 decrease in recruiting and relocation costs, (d) a $178,000 increase in severance costs attributable to employees terminated as a result of our March 2007 restructuring, (e) a $632,000 decrease in wages and benefits, which was also attributable to our March 2007 restructuring, (f) a $227,000 decrease in other operating expenses, primarily insurance and laboratory operating fees, (g) a $647,000 increase related to a decrease in allocations of expense from SG&A to funded and unfunded research and development costs for overhead and other costs allocable to research and development programs, and (h) a $40,000 decrease in other expenses, net.

Operating Loss:Operating loss for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared with the operating loss for the year ended December 31, 2006 decreased by $4.4 million to $13.3 million, a 24.7% decrease, as a result of the factors noted above.

Gain on Sale of Securities Available for Sale:The gain on sale of securities available for sale for the year ended December 31, 2007 was $2.5 million compared with a gain of $4.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2006. During 2007, we sold 1,452,770 shares of Plug Power common stock at a weighted average price of $3.53 per share, with gross proceeds to us of $5.1 million.

Gain (loss) on Derivatives:We recorded a gain on derivative accounting of $3.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 and a gain of $182,000 on derivative accounting for the year ended December 31, 2006. Both the 2007 and 2006 gains are the result of derivative treatment of the freestanding warrants issued to investors in conjunction with our December 2006 capital raise.

Income Tax (Expense) Benefit:Our income tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2007 was 33%, while the income tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2006 was 15%. These tax rates were primarily the result of losses generated by operations, changes in the valuation allowance, state true-ups upon tax return filings, permanent deductible differences for the derivative valuation, and disproportionate effects of reclassification of gains on Plug Power security sales included in operating loss.

The valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets at December 31, 2007 was $22.3 million and at December 31, 2006 was $18.9 million. We determined that it was more likely than not that the ultimate recognition of certain deferred tax assets would not be realized.

Results of Operations for the Year Ended December 31, 2006 Compared to December 31, 2005.

Product Revenue:Product revenue in our test and measurement instrumentation business increased by $1.7 million, or 27.5%, to $7.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 from $6.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. This performance was primarily the result of (a) an increase of $1.5 million, or 55.0%, in dimensional gauging sales, particularly direct capacitance sales through our Japanese distributor, (b) increases in semiconductor sales of $200,000, as 18 manual, one automatic, and one semi-automated metrology


tool systems were sold during the year, compared to seven manual, one semi-automated, and four OEM systems during 2005, (c) commercial aviation equipment sales increases of $539,000, and (d) lower revenue from the U.S. Air Force of $611,000 as a result of fewer purchases of new equipment and reduced activity under the existing repair contract.

In our test and measurement instrumentation business, the U.S. Air Force accounted for $1.8 million, or 23.1%, of product revenue during the year ended December 31, 2006 compared with $2.4 million, or 39.7%, of product revenue during the year ended December 31, 2005. During 2006, Koyo Precision, our Japanese distributor, represented $1.8 million, or 22.9%, of product revenue.

Information regarding government contracts included in product revenue is as follows:

(Dollars in thousands)

 

 

Revenue

Year Ended December 31,

 

Revenue

Contract to Date

 

Total Contract

Orders Received

to Date

 

Contract

Expiration

 

2005

 

 

2006

 

Dec. 31, 2006

 

Dec. 31, 2006

 

$8.8 million Air Force Retrofit and Maintenance of PBS-4100 Systems

05/19/2008 (1)

$

1,552

 

$

1,417

 

$

6,627

 

$

6,637

 

__________________________________________________________________________________________

(1)

Expiration date was extended during December 2007 from December 20, 2007 to May 19, 2008.

Funded Research and Development Revenue:Funded research and development revenue in our new energy business decreased $1.3 million, or 73.3%, to $489,000 for the year ended December 31, 2006 from $1.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. The decrease in revenue was primarily the result of the suspension of previously approved DOE funding for 2006 and the completion of other programs that were active in 2005, including programs with the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority, the Army Research Labs, the Marine Corps, the Cabot Superior Micro Powders subcontract with the National Institute of Standards and Technology, and Harris. This decrease was partially offset by $427,000 of revenue recognized from the Samsung alliance agreement during 2006.

Information regarding government and private company development contracts included in funded research and development revenue is as follows:

(Dollars in thousands)

 

 

Revenue Year Ended

December 31, 2005

Revenue Year Ended

December 31, 2006

 

Revenue

Contract to Date

Contract

Expiration (1)

 

Revenue

 

Percent

Revenue

 

Percent

 

Dec. 31, 2006

$3.0 million DOE(2)

07/31/07

 

$

930

 

50.8

%

$

62

 

12.7

%

$

1,171

$1.3 million NYSERDA(3)

06/30/06

 

 

329

 

18.0

 

 

 

 

 

1,135

$1.0 million Samsung(4)

07/31/07

 

 

 

 

 

427

 

87.3

 

 

427

$418,000 SAFT(5)

12/31/06

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$250,000 ARL

09/30/05

 

 

250

 

13.7

 

 

 

 

 

250

$210,000 NIST(6)

06/30/05

 

 

100

 

5.5

 

 

 

 

 

210

$150,000 Harris(7)

06/25/04

 

 

150

 

8.2

 

 

 

 

 

150

$70,000 Marine Corps

03/31/05

 

 

70

 

3.8

 

 

 

 

 

70

Total

 

 

$

1,829

 

100.0

%

$

489

 

100.0

%

$

3,413

__________________________________________________________________________________________

(1)

Dates represent expiration of contract, not date of final billing.

(2)

DOE funding for this cost shared contract was suspended during 2006.

(3)

The total contract value for this cost shared contract is $1.3 million consisting of four Phases: Phase I for $500,000 was from March 12, 2002 through September 30, 2003; Phase II for $200,000 was from October 28, 2003 through October 31, 2004; Phase III for $348,000 was from August 23, 2004 through August 31, 2005; and Phase IV for $202,000 which commenced on December 14, 2004 and expired on June 30, 2006. Phases I, II, and III have been completed, while Phase IV expired before it was completed.

(4)

Represents a research and prototype contract that includes one up-front payment of $750,000 and two milestone payments totaling $250,000 for the delivery of acceptable prototypes.

(5)

Represents a fixed price subcontract with SAFT under the U.S. Army CECOM contract. The purchase order received in connection with this subcontract was revised on November 14, 2006 eliminating one milestone. As a result, the contract value was reduced from $470,000 to $418,000 and the expiration date was extended from September 30 to December 31, 2006.

(6)

Represents a fixed price subcontract with CSMP under NIST and includes the original contract for $200,000 and a contract amendment for $10,000.

(7)

Represents a fixed price contract that includes the original contract for $200,000, an amendment for $50,000, and a 2005 amendment reducing the contract by $100,000.

Cost of Product Revenue:Cost of product revenue in our test and measurement instrumentation business increased by $519,000, or 21.8%, to $2.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 from $2.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. This increase is consistent with higher product revenue during 2006 compared with 2005.


Gross profit as a percentage of product revenue increased by 1.8% to 62.2% for the year ended December 31, 2006. The improvement in gross margin during 2006 was primarily the result of a five point rise in average margins on capacitance product sales resulting from higher sales volume and improved pricing strategies.

Funded Research and Product Development Expenses:New energy funded research and product development expenses decreased by $2.4 million, or 67.6%, to $1.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 from $3.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. The decreased costs were attributable to active contracts during 2005, which were no longer active during 2006. During 2006, we had active contracts with Samsung, DOE and SAFT, while during 2005 we had active contracts with DOE, NYSERDA, SAFT, NIST, ARL, and the Marine Corps.

Unfunded Research and Product Development Expenses:Unfunded research and product development expenses increased by $5.7 million, or 92.4%, to $11.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 from $6.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. This increase reflected a $5.4 million increase in our new energy business related to increased internal costs for the development of micro fuel cell systems and costs in connection with developing prototypes and product intent prototypes, including a $512,000 non-cash charge for share-based compensation resulting from the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, which requires that the fair value of share-based compensation be expensed. This increase also included a $208,000 increase in product development expenses in our test and measurement instrumentation business for projects related to the development of a glass thickness gauge, improvements to the portable engine vibration and balancing system, and updated industrial balancing software.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses:Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased by $815,000, or 7.5%, to $10.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 from $10.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. This decrease was primarily the result of (a) an $892,000 increase in non-cash equity compensation charges resulting from the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, which required that the fair value of share-based compensation be expensed, (b) a $1.1 million decrease in salaries and engineering management costs, partially a result of an increase in costs directly charged to research and product development and the elimination of the government systems group during the second quarter of 2005, (c) a $640,000 decrease related to increases in liquidations to unfunded research and development costs, which was a result of having charged more time to internal development projects for low power and high power technology platform developments, the development of prototypes for Samsung, and the development of the Mobion 30M product, (d) a $259,000 decrease in the Los Alamos National Laboratory license fees as a result of an amendment of the license agreement, which resulted in reduced minimum annual license payments, (e) a $152,000 decrease in depreciation costs primarily related to the renewal of the lease on our main office, (f) a $104,000 increase in commission costs at MTI Instruments, (g) a $131,000 increase in incentive compensation primarily related to new executive employment agreements, (h) a $261,000 increase in marketing costs as MTI Micro raised its emphasis on marketing and business development and MTI Micro.Instruments underwent a major rebranding campaign during 2006, and (i) a $39,000 decrease in other expenses, net.

Operating Loss:Operating loss increased by $2.6 million, or 17.5%, to $17.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared with the year ended December 31, 2005 as a result of the factors noted above.

Gain on Sale of Securities Available for Sale:The gain on sale of securities available for sale for the year ended December 31, 2006 was $4.3 million compared with $10.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. During the year ended December 31, 2006, we sold 1,103,500 shares of Plug Power common stock at a weighted average price of $5.66 per share, with gross proceeds to us of $6.2 million.

On June 24, 2005, Fletcher International Ltd., or Fletcher, notified us of its election to exercise in full its right to purchase from us an amount of common stock of Plug Power. As a result of this election, Fletcher purchased 1,799,791 shares of Plug Power common stock from us at a price of $0.7226 per share, with proceeds to us of $1.3 million. In connection with this exercise, we recognized a loss on this embedded derivative immediately prior to exercise of $7.2 million and a gain on the sale of Plug Power common shares of $9.6 million.

Gain (loss) on Derivatives:We recorded a gain on derivative accounting of $182,000 for the year ended December 31, 2006 and a loss of $10.4 million on derivative accounting for the year ended December 31, 2005. The 2006 gain was the result of derivative treatment of the freestanding warrants issued in conjunction with our December 2006 capital raise, while the 2005 result related to an embedded derivative for the purchase of Plug Power common stock, which was issued as part of the 2004 private placement transaction. The warrant derivative was valued using the Black-Scholes Pricing model, as was the embedded derivative prior to its exercise on June 24, 2005. Upon exercise, the embedded derivative was valued at its intrinsic value.

Income Tax (Expense) Benefit:Our income tax expense rate for the year ended December 31, 2006 was 15%, while the income tax expense rate for the year ended December 31, 2005 was 11%. These tax rates were primarily the result of losses generated by operations, changes in the valuation allowance, and disproportionate effects of reclassification of gains on Plug Power security sales included in operating loss.

The valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets at December 31, 2006 was $18.8 million and at December 31, 2005 was $10.9 million. We determined that it was more likely than not that the ultimate recognition of certain deferred tax assets would not be realized.


Liquidity and Capital Resources

We have incurred significant losses as we continue to fund the development and commercialization of our portable power source business. We expect that losses will fluctuate from year to year and that such fluctuations may be substantial as a result of, among other factors, sales of securities available for sale, our operating results, the availability of equity financing, including warrants issued in connection with the December 2006 capital raise, and the ability to attract government funding resources to offset research and development costs. As of December 31, 2007, we had an accumulated deficit of $105.1 million. During the year ended December 31, 2007, our results of operations resulted in a net loss of $9.6 million and cash used in operating activities totaling $11.7 million. This cash use in 2007 was funded primarily by cash and cash equivalents on hand as of December 31, 2006 of $14.5 million and proceeds from the sales of securities available for sale of $5.1 million. We expect to continue to incur losses as we seek to develop and commercialize our portable power source products and we expect to continue funding our operations from current cash and cash equivalents, the sales of securities available for sale, proceeds, if any, from equity financings, including warrants issued in connection with the December 2006 capital raise, and government funding. We expect to spend approximately $11.7 million on research and development of Mobion technology and $1.8 million in research and development on MTI Instruments’ products during 2008.

Additional financing during 2008 may not be available to us on acceptable terms, if at all. Cash used to support operations is expected to total approximately $11.8 million and cash used for capital expenditures is expected to total approximately $1.1 million. Capital expenditures will consist of purchases of manufacturing and laboratory equipment, software, computer equipment, and furniture. Proceeds from our sale of securities available for sale are subject to fluctuations in the market value of Plug Power. We may also seek to supplement our resources through additional equity offerings, sales of assets (including MTI Instruments), and additional government revenue could also provide more resources.

As of December 31, 2007, we owned 1,137,166 shares of Plug Power common stock. Potential future sales of Plug Power securities will generate taxable income or loss, which is different from book income or loss, as a result of the tax bases in these assets being significantly different from their book bases. Book and tax bases as of December 31, 2007 are as follows:

Security

 

Shares Held

 

Average Book

Cost Basis

 

Average Tax

Cost Basis

Plug Power

 

1,137,166

 

$

1.78

 

$

0.96

Plug Power stock is currently traded on The Nasdaq Global Market and is therefore subject to stock market conditions. When acquired, these securities were unregistered. Our Plug Power securities are considered “restricted securities” as defined in the securities laws and may not be sold in the future without registration under the Securities Act, unless in compliance with an available exemption from registration. While our Plug Power shares remain “restricted securities,” these shares are now freely transferable in accordance with Rule 144(d) under the Securities Act, subject to the limitations associated with such rule.

Working capital was $11.3 million at December 31, 2007, a $9.5 million decrease from $20.8 million at December 31, 2006. This decrease was primarily the result of the use of cash in operations offset by proceeds from sale of securities available for sale.

At December 31, 2007, the Company’s order backlog was $445,000, compared to $220,000 at December 31, 2006.

Our inventory turnover ratios and average accounts receivable days sales outstanding for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2007 and their changes are as follows:

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

 

��

 

2006

 

2007

 

Change

 

Inventory turnover

 

2.6

 

2.3

 

(0.3

)

Average accounts receivable days sales outstanding

 

45

 

58

 

13

 

The decline in inventory turnover stemmed from a 13% higher year-end inventory balance needed to support new product initiatives as these products gain acceptance in their targeted markets, as well as maintenance of higher stock levels to support continued growth at strategic end-use customers.

The increase in average accounts receivable days sales outstanding in 2007 compared with 2006 was primarily attributable to our decision to grant our largest commercial customer 90-day payment terms.

Cash flow used by operating activities was $11.7 million during 2007 compared with $12.7 million during 2006. This cash use decrease of $1.0 million reflected a net decrease of $3.5 million in cash expenditures to fund operations coupled with net balance sheet changes, which increased cash expenditures by $2.5 million, reflecting the timing of cash receipts and payments, particularly recognition of


deferred revenue and payment of certain accrued liabilities.

Capital expenditures were $414,000 during 2007, a decrease of $1.2 million from the prior year. Capital expenditures during 2007 included computer equipment, software, and manufacturing and laboratory equipment. Outstanding commitments for capital expenditures as of December 31, 2007 totaled $35,000 and included expenditures for laboratory and computer equipment. We expect to finance these expenditures and other capital expenditures during 2008 with current cash and cash equivalents, the sale of securities available for sale, equity financing, and other sources, as appropriate and to the extent available.

During 2007, we sold 1,452,770 shares of Plug Power common stock with proceeds totaling $5.1 million and gains totaling $2.5 million. These proceeds reflect our previously announced strategy to raise additional capital through the sale of Plug Power stock to fund our micro fuel cell operations. We expect the net gains to be offset by our operating losses for purposes of computing taxable income. We estimate that as of December 31, 2007, our remaining net operating loss carry forwards were approximately $54 million.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Pursuant to a financing transaction between us and certain investors on December 15, 2006, we issued warrants to purchase up to an aggregate 3,027,778 shares of our common stock exercisable at any time until December 19, 2011 at an exercise price per share of $2.27. The shares issuable upon exercise of these warrants would be issued under a shelf registration statement covering the resale of such shares. The terms of the warrant agreement permits a cash settlement with the holders of the warrants if we are acquired by, or merge with, a private company. Because of the possibility of such a settlement, we have classified this agreement as an asset/liability derivative in accordance with SFAS No. 133 and EITF 00-19.

Critical Accounting Policies and Significant Judgments and Estimates

The Company'sfollowing discussion and analysis of its financial condition and results of operations is based upon the Company'sour consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements includes a summary of the Company'sour most significant accounting policies. The preparation of these financial statements requires the Companyus to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenuesrevenue and expenses, and related disclosure of assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, the Company evaluates itswe evaluate our estimates and judgments, including those related to revenue recognition, inventories, securities available for sale, income taxes, share-based compensation and derivatives. Management bases itsWe base our estimates on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making jud gmentsjudgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. Management discussed ourWe review critical accounting estimates with the Audit Committee of our Audit Committee.Board of Directors.

The significant accounting policies that management believeswe believe are most critical to aid in fully understanding and evaluating our reported financial results include the following:

Revenue Recognition: The Company recognizesWe recognize revenue from development contracts based upon the relationship of actual costs to estimated costs to complete the contract. These types of contracts typically provide development services to achieve a specific scientific result relating to DMFCdirect methanol fuel cell technology. Some of these contracts require the Companyus to contribute to the development effort. The customers for these contracts are both commercial customers and various state and federal government agencies. WhenWhile government agencies are providing revenue, we do not expect the government to be a significant end user of the resulting products. Therefore, the Company doeswe do not reduce funded research and product development expense by the funding received. When it appears probable that estimated costs will exceed available funding on fixed price contracts and the Company iswe are not successful in securing additional funding, the Company recordswe record the estimated additional expense before it is incurred.

We apply the guidance in SAB No. 104,Revenue Recognition, in the evaluation of commercially funded fuel cell research and prototype agreements in order to determine when to properly recognize income. Payments received in connection with commercial research and prototype agreements are deferred and recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the agreement for service-related payments. For milestone and prototype delivery payments, if and when achieved, revenue is deferred and recognized on a straight-line basis over the remaining term of the agreement. When revenue qualifies for recognition it will be recorded as funded research and development revenue. The Comp any had no accrual for contract losses for the year ended December 31, 2005.costs associated with research and prototype-producing activities are expensed as incurred. Expenses in an amount equal to revenue recognized are reclassified from unfunded research and product development to funded research and product development.

The Company recognizes

We also recognize revenue from product sales in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin ("SAB")SAB No. 104,Revenue Recognition.104. Product revenue is recognized when there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, delivery of the product to the customer or distributor has occurred, at which time title generally is passed to the customer or distributor, and the Company haswe have determined that collection of a fixed fee is probable, all of which occur upon shipment of the product. If the product requires installation to be performed by the Company,us, all revenue related to the product is deferred and recognized upon the completion of the installation.


Inventory:

Inventory: Inventory is valued at the lower of cost or the current estimated market value of the inventory. We periodically review inventory quantities on hand and record a provision for excess and/or obsolete inventory based primarily on our estimated forecast of product demand, as well as based on historical usage. Demand and usage for products and materials can fluctuate significantly. A significant decrease in demand for our products could result in a short-term increase in the cost of inventory purchases and an increase of excess inventory quantities on hand. Therefore, although we make every effort to ensure the accuracy of our forecasts of future product demand, any significant unanticipated changes in demand could have a significant impact on the value of our inventory and our reported operating results.

Share-Based Payments:We grant options to purchase our common stock and award restricted stock to our employees and directors under our equity incentive plans. The benefits provided under these plans are share-based payments subject to the provisions of SFAS No. 123R,Share-Based Payment,and SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin 107,Share-Based Payments. Effective January 1, 2006, we use the fair value method to apply the provisions of FAS 123R with the modified prospective application, which provides for certain changes to the method for valuing share-based compensation. The valuation provisions of FAS 123R apply to new awards and to awards that are outstanding on the effective date and subsequently modified. Under the modified prospective application, prior periods are not revised for comparative purposes. Share-based compensation expense recognized under FAS 123R for the year ended December 31, 2007 was $1.6 million. At December 31, 2007, total unrecognized estimated compensation expense related to non-vested awards granted prior to that date was $1.6 million, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.31 years.

Upon adoption of FAS 123R, we began estimating the value of share-based awards on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Prior to the adoption of FAS 123R, the value of each share-based award was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes model for the pro forma information required to be disclosed under FAS 123. The determination of the fair value of share-based payment awards on the date of grant using an option-pricing model is affected by our stock price as well as assumptions regarding a number of complex and subjective variables. These variables include our expected stock price volatility over the term of the awards, actual and projected employee stock option exercise behaviors, risk-free interest rate and expected dividends.

If factors change and we employ different assumptions in the application of FAS 123R during future periods, the compensation expense that we record under FAS 123R may differ significantly from what we have recorded in the current period. Therefore, we believe it is important for investors to be aware of the high degree of subjectivity involved when using option-pricing models to estimate share-based compensation under FAS 123R. Option-pricing models were developed for use in estimating the value of traded options that have no vesting or hedging restrictions, are fully transferable and do not cause dilution. Because our share-based payments have characteristics significantly different from those of freely traded options, and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect our estimates of fair values, in our opinion, existing valuation models, including the Black-Scholes Option Pricing model, may not provide reliable measures of the fair values of our share-based compensation. Consequently, there is a risk that our estimates of the fair values of our share-based compensation awards on the grant dates may bear little resemblance to the intrinsic values realized upon the exercise, expiration, cancellation or forfeiture of those share-based payments in the future. Certain share-based payments, such as employee stock options, may expire worthless or otherwise result in zero intrinsic value as compared to the fair values originally estimated on the grant date and expensed in our financial statements. Alternatively, value may be realized from these instruments that are significantly in excess of the fair values originally estimated on the grant date and expensed in our financial statements. There is currently neither a market-based mechanism nor other practical application to verify the reliability and accuracy of the estimates stemming from these valuation models, nor a way to compare and adjust the estimates to actual values. Although the fair value of employee share-based awards is determined in accordance with FAS 123R and SAB 107 using a qualified option-pricing model, that value may not be indicative of the fair value observed in a willing buyer/willing seller market transaction. Estimates of share-based compensation expenses are significant to our financial statements, but these expenses are based on the aforementioned option valuation model and will never result in the payment of cash by us.

The guidance in FAS 123R and SAB 107 is still relatively new, and best practices are not well established. The application of these principles may be subject to further interpretation and refinement over time. There are significant differences among valuation models, and there is a possibility that we will adopt different valuation models in the future. This may result in a lack of consistency in future periods and materially affect the fair value estimate of share-based payments. It may also result in a lack of comparability with other companies that use different models, methods and assumptions.

Theoretical valuation models and market-based methods are evolving and may result in lower or higher fair value estimates for share-based compensation. The timing, readiness, adoption, general acceptance, reliability and testing of these methods is uncertain. Sophisticated mathematical models may require voluminous historical information, modeling expertise, financial analyses, correlation analyses, integrated software and databases, consulting fees, customization and testing for adequacy of internal controls.

For purposes of estimating the fair value of stock options granted during the year ended December 31, 2007 using the Black-Scholes model, we used the historical volatility of our stock for the expected volatility assumption input to the Black-Scholes model, consistent with the guidance in FAS 123R and SAB 107. The risk-free interest rate is based on the risk-free zero-coupon rate for a period consistent with the expected option term at the time of grant. We do not currently pay nor do we anticipate paying dividends,


but we are required to assume a dividend yield as an input to the Black-Scholes model. As such, we use a zero dividend rate. The expected option term is estimated using both historical term measures and projected termination estimates.

Income Taxes:As part of the process of preparing our consolidated financial statements, the Company iswe are required to estimate itsour income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which it operates.we operate. This process involves the estimation of our actual current tax exposure

24

together with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. Included in this assessment is the determination of net operating loss carry forwards. These differences result in a net deferred tax asset. The Company must assess the likelihood that itsour deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income and, to the extent that the Company believeswe believe that recovery is not likely, itwe must establish a valuation allowance.

Significant management judgment is required in determining our provision for income taxes, our deferred tax assets and liabilities and any valuation allowance recorded against our net deferred tax assets. We have recorded a valuation allowance due to uncertainties related to our ability to realize certain net deferred tax assets, primarily consisting of net operating losses being carried forward. In the event that actual results differ from these estimates or we adjust these estimates in future periods, we may need to adjust the recorded valuation allowance, which could materially impact our financial position and results of operations. The Company hasWe have recorded a $10.923 millionfull valuation allowance against itsour net deferred tax assets of $10.900$22.3 million as of December 31, 2005.2007. This valuation allowance is due to uncertainties related to our ability to realize certain of these assets. The valuation allowance is based on estimates of the recoverability of certain net operating losses. In the event actu alactual results differ from these estimates or we adjust these estimates in future periods we may need to adjust our valuation allowance which could materially impact our financial position and results of operations.

In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48,Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, which became effective for us beginning in fiscal 2007. FIN 48 addresses the determination of how tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Under FIN 48, we must recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position are measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate resolution. The impact of our reassessment of our tax positions in accordance with FIN 48 did not have a material impact on our results of operations, financial condition or liquidity.

Derivative Instruments: The Company has held or issued certainWe account for derivative instruments and embedded derivative instruments and records these derivatives and embedded derivative instruments separate from the host contract in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS")SFAS No. 133,Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,, as amended. The amended by SFAS No. 138, Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities.These standards require the Companystandard requires an entity to recognize all derivative instrumentsderivatives as either assets or liabilities onin the statement of financial position and measure these instruments at fair value. Fair values arevalue is estimated using the Black Scholes Option-Pricing Model. FairBlack-Scholes Pricing model. We also follow EITF Issue No. 00-19,Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to and Potentially Settled in, a Company’s Own Stock, which requires freestanding contracts that are settled in a company’s own stock, including common stock warrants, to be designated as an equity instrument, asset or a liability. Under the provisions of EITF Issue No. 00-19, a contract designated as an asset or a liability must be carried at fair value, estimateswith any changes in fair value recorded in the results of operations. A contract designated as an equity instrument can be included in equity with no fair value adjustments required.

Our asset/liability derivatives are subject to significant change between periods due to fluctuations ofvalued on a quarterly basis using the variablesBlack-Scholes Pricing model. Significant assumptions used in the model.

Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations

Results of Operationsvaluation included exercise dates, closing prices for the Year Ended December 31, 2005 Compared to December 31, 2004:The following is management's discussion and analysis of certain significant factors, which have affected the Company's results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2005 compared to the year ended December 31, 2004.

Product Revenue:Product revenue in the Test and Measurement Instrumentation segment for 2005 decreased by $1.518 million, or 20.2%, to $6.012 million. This decrease is primarily the result of decreased sales to aviation customers of $1.014 million reflecting the September 2004 expiration of a U.S. Air Force contract which accounted for $1.447 million of product revenue in 2004; decreases of $.798 million in semiconductor product sales reflecting the shipment of seven manual units, one semi-automated unit and four OEM machines during 2005 as compared to twelve manual units, five semi-automated units, five OEM machines and two AutoScan units for the same period in 2004; partially offset by increases in sales to general gaging customers of $.294 million related to increases in capacitance product sales and an increase in business generated by the Company's Japanese distributor.

In the Test and Measurement Instrumentation segment, in 2005 the U.S. Air Force accounted for $2.385 million or 39.7% of product revenues; in 2004, the U.S. Air Force accounted for $3.508 million or 46.6% of product revenues.

Information regarding government contracts included in product revenue is as follows:

     

Total Contract

(Dollars in thousands, except contract values)

 

Revenues

Revenues

Revenues

Orders

Year Ended

Year Ended

Contract to Date

Received to Date

Contract

Expiration

Dec. 31, 2005

Dec. 31, 2004

Dec. 31, 2005

Dec. 31, 2005

$8.8 million Retrofit and Maintenance of PBS 4100's

06/20/2008

$ 1,552

$ 1,918

$5,210

$ 5,262

$3.1 million PBS units and Accessory Kits

09/30/2004

$ -

$ 1,447

$2,469

$ 2,469

Funded Research and Development Revenue:Funded research and development revenue in the New Energy segment for 2005 increased by $.789 million to $1.829 million, a 75.9% increase. This increase is the result of increases of $.751 million from the U.S. Department of Energy ("DOE"), $.250 million from the U.S. Army, $.224 million from the New York State Energy Development Authority ("NYSERDA"), $.150 million from the Harris Corporation ("Harris"), $.070 million from the U.S. Marine Corps partially offset by decreases from the National Institute of Standards and Technology ("NIST") contract's completion in 2004 when it contributed $.446 million, the Army Research Laboratories contract's completion in 2004 when it contributed $.200 million, and a $.010 million decrease from the Cabot Superior Micro Powders ("CSMP") NIST subcontract.

25

Information regarding government contracts included in funded research and development revenue is as follows:

(Dollars in thousands, except contract values)

   

Revenues

Percentage

Revenues

Percentage

Revenues

 

Contract

 

Year Ended

of

Year Ended

of

Contract to Date

Contract

Type

Expiration(6)

Dec. 31, 2005

2005 Total

Dec. 31, 2004

2004 Total

Dec. 31, 2005

$3.0 million DOE

B

07/31/07

$ 930

50.8%

$ 179

17.2%

$ 1,109

$470 thousand SAFT(1)

A

09/30/06

$ -

-

$ -

-

$ -

$1.250 million NYSERDA(2)

B

06/30/06

$ 329

18.0

$ 105

10.1

$ 1,135

$249.8 thousand Army

A

09/30/05

$ 250

13.7

$ -

-

$ 250

$69.9 thousand Marine

A

03/31/05

$ 70

3.8

$ -

-

$ 70

$210 thousand NIST(3)

A

06/30/05

$ 100

5.5

$ 110

10.6

$ 210

$150 thousand Harris(4)

A

06/25/04

$ 150

8.2

$ -

-

$ 150

$200 thousand ARL

A

04/30/04

$ -

-

$ 200

19.2

$ 200

$4.6 million NIST(5)

B

09/30/04

$ -

-

$ 446

42.9

$ 3,342

Total funded research and

       

development revenue

  

$ 1,829

100.0%

$ 1,040

100.0%

 

(1)This is a subcontract with SAFT America Inc. (SAFT) under the U.S. Army CECOM.

(2)Total contract value is $1.250 million consisting of four Phases: Phase I for $500 thousand was from 3/12/02 thru 9/30/03; Phase II for $200 thousand was from 10/28/03 with a completion date of 10/31/04; Phase III for $348 thousand was from 8/23/04 through 8/31/05; and Phase IV for $202 thousand which commenced on 12/14/04 and expires on 6/30/06. Phases I and II have been completed and the final report for Phase III has been accepted. Retainage will be billed upon acceptance of final report incorporating all completed phases of the contract.

(3) This is a subcontract with CSMP under NIST and includes the original contract for $200 thousand and a contract amendment for $10 thousand.

(4) This contract includes the original contract for $200 thousand, an amendment for $50 thousand and a 2005 amendment reducing the contract by $100 thousand.

(5)This contract was a joint venture with DuPont. DuPont's share of the contract revenue was $1.3 million.

(6) Dates represent expiration of contract, not date of final billing.

Contract Type A - Fixed Price Contract.

Contract Type B - Cost Shared Contract.

Cost of Product Revenue:Cost of product revenue in the Test and Measurement Instrumentation segment for the year ended December 31, 2005 decreased by $.496 million or 17.2% to $2.381 million. This decrease coincides with the lower sales volume for 2005 compared to the same period in 2004, which included lower aviation and semiconductor sales partially offset by increases in general gaging sales.

Gross profit as a percentage of product revenue decreased by 1.4% to 60.4% for the year ended December 31, 2005. This decrease is primarily attributable to the reduction in U.S. Air Force shipments.

Funded Research and Product Development Expenses:Funded research and product development expenses in the New Energy segment decreased by $.485 million, or 12.0%, to $3.555 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. The decreased costs were attributable to a change in contracts under development during 2005 and the completion of contracts during 2004. The majority of costs for 2005 were incurred under the DOE and NYSERDA contracts while the majority of costs for the comparable period were incurred under the NIST, ARL, Harris and U.S. Army contracts.

Unfunded Research and Product Development Expenses:Unfunded research and product development expenses for the year ended December 31, 2005 decreased by $2.804 million or 31.4% to $6.116 million. This decrease reflects a $2.780 million decrease for the New Energy segment reflecting decreased internal development costs for our micro fuel cell system for Intermec since the Intermec product was completed in the fourth quarter of 2004 and development costs in connection with Gillette, accounting for $2.379 million of the decrease. Although overall research and development spending on the Gillette initiative had decreased from the prior year, this was a planned decrease due to an increased emphasis on product identification and marketing requirements during 2005. This decrease also includes a $.024 million decrease for the Test and Measurement Instrumentation segment. Test and Measurement Instrumentation product development in 2005 includes costs for improvements for the Microtrak II product , a high temperature capacitance gauge to serve the brake rotor market and the development of balancing software for the industrial market.

26

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses:Selling, general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2005 totaled $10.887 million, an increase of $4.562 million or 72.1%. These increases are primarily the result of the following changes: a $.995 million increase in non-cash stock-based compensation charges; a $2.077 million increase in salary and benefits related, in some part, to an increase in engineering management costs not directly charged to research and product development, an increase in the number of employees working in government and military relations, strategic planning and business development as well as corporate support employees related to Sarbanes-Oxley compliance, an expanded sales organization at MTI Instruments and CEO and employee recruiting costs; increased costs of $.543 million related to consulting and other professional fees (including increases of approximately $.387 million of costs related to consultants for government relations, business dev elopment, finance and information technology, $.469 million of costs related to Sarbanes-Oxley compliance and the SEC review of the Company's filings, $.106 million of legal costs related to SEC and general corporate matters, partially offset by decreases of $.300 million in advisory fees and $.148 million in legal fees related to the 2004 private placement amendment); increased depreciation expense of $.341 million due to an increase in capital expenditures; an increase of $.130 million in licensing and patent fees related to agreements with LANL; increased costs of $.437 million related to costs which were liquidated to research and development costs in the prior year; and a $.039 million increase in other expenses, net.

Operating Loss:The year ended December 31, 2005 yielded an operating loss of $15.098 million, an increase of $1.506 million from 2004, or 11.1%. This change results primarily from increases in selling, general and administration expense as well as decreases in gross profits from product revenues in the Test and Measurement Instrumentation segment partially offset by increases in funded research and development revenue in the New Energy segment and decreases in funded and unfunded research and product development expenses.

Gain on Sale of Securities Available for Sale:Results for the year ended December 31, 2005 included a $10.125 million gain compared to the prior year ended December 31, 2004, gain of $3.626 million. During 2005, the Company sold 100,000 shares of Plug PowerCompany’s common stock, at a price of $6.68 per share, with proceeds to the Company of $.668 million. On June 24, 2005, Fletcher notified the Company of its election to exercise in full its right to purchase from the Company certain shares of common stock of Plug Power. As a result of this election, Fletcher purchased 1,799,791 shares of Plug Power common stock from the Company at a price of $0.7226 per share, with proceeds to the Company of $1.301 million. This transaction closed on June 28, 2005 and, in connection with this exercise, the Company recognized a loss on the derivative immediately prior to exercise of $7.173 million and a gain on the sale of Plug Power common shares of $9.635 million.

(Loss) Gain on Derivatives:The Company recorded a loss of $10.407 million and a gain of $.614 million on derivative accounting for 2005 and 2004, respectively. These results relate to the embedded derivative for the purchase of Plug Power common stock, which is part of the 2004 private placement transaction, and the January 2004 expiration of the SatCon warrants. Changes in derivative fair values for the embedded derivative and the SatCon warrants are calculated using the Black Scholes Option-Pricing model or upon exercise the intrinsic value method.

Income Tax (Expense) Benefit:The income tax expense rate for the year ended December 31, 2005 was 11% compared to the income tax benefit rate for the year ended December 31, 2004 of 39%. These tax rates are primarily due to losses generated by operations, changes in the valuation allowance and the projected annual effective tax rate adjustments.

The Company established a valuation allowance of $10.923 million at December 31, 2005 compared to $1.836 million at December 31, 2004. The Company determined that it was more likely than not that the ultimate recognition of certain deferred tax assets would not be realized.

Further, as a result of ownership changes in 1996, the availability of $.561 million of net operating loss carry-forwards to offset future taxable income will be limited pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

Results of Operations for the Year Ended December 31, 2004 Compared to December 31, 2003: The following is management's discussion and analysis of certain significant factors, which have affected the Company's results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2004 compared to the year ended December 31, 2003.

Product Revenue:Product revenue in the Test and Measurement Instrumentation segment for 2004 increased in comparison to the same period in 2003 by $1.983 million, or 35.7%, to $7.530 million. This increase is primarily the result of an increase in sales to aviation customers of $1.203 million, reflecting an increase in shipments under two Air Force contracts and a $.782 million increase in semiconductor product sales, which includes shipments of the first two AutoScans and two 300 SA wafer metrology tools.

In the Test and Measurement Instrumentation segment, the U.S. Air Force accounted for $3.508 million or 46.6% of

product revenues in 2004; as compared to 2003, where the U.S. Air Force accounted for $2.261 million or 40.8% of product revenues.

27

Information regarding government contracts included in product revenue is as follows:

(Dollars in thousands, except contract values)

Revenues

Revenues

Revenues

Total Contract

 

Year Ended

Year Ended

Contract to Date

Orders Received to Date

Contract

Expiration

Dec. 31, 2004

Dec. 31, 2003

Dec. 31, 2004

Dec. 31, 2004

$8.8 million Retrofit and

     

Maintenance of PBS 4100's

06/20/2008

$ 1,918

$ 1,740

$ 3,658

$ 3,712

$3.1 million PBS units and

     

Accessory Kits

09/30/2004

$ 1,447

$ 211

$ 2,469

$ 2,469

MTI Micro shipped its initial low volume production commercial product to a customer who plans to offer an RFID tag reader powered by a Mobion® fuel cell. MTI Micro's initial shipments of low volume production Mobion®products is a customer specific arrangement that includes fuel cell systems and continued warranty support. While contract terms require payment upon delivery of the fuel cell system and are not contingent on the achievement of specific milestones or other substantive performance, the continuing obligation to warranty results in deferring recognition of product-related revenue and recognizing product-related revenue when the warranty obligations expire. The warranty on the product is for a period of fifteen months.

As MTI Micro gains commercial experience, including field experience relative to warranty based on the sales of its initial low volume production Mobion® products, in future periods, MTI Micro may recognize product-related revenue upon delivery of the product or may continue to defer recognition, based on application of appropriate guidance within SAB 104, or changes in the manner contractual agreements are structured, including agreements with distribution partners.

Funded Research and Development Revenue:Funded research and development revenue in the New Energy segment for 2004 decreased in comparison to the same period in 2003 by $1.271 million to $1.040 million, a 55.0% decrease. The decrease is the result of the NIST and NYSERDA government contracts contributing $1.381 million less revenue in 2004 compared to 2003 due to the completion of Phase II of the NYSERDA contract in the fourth quarter of 2003 and the wind down of the NIST contract during the third quarter of 2004. Harris revenues of $.175 million and other military contractor revenue of $.204 million were also recorded in 2003. These decreases were partially offset by $.489 million in 2004 revenues under new contracts with ARL, CSMP and DOE.

Information regarding government contracts included in funded research and development revenue is as follows:

(Dollars in thousands, except contract values)

   

Revenues

Revenues

Revenues

Contract

 

Year Ended

Year Ended

Contract to Date

Contract

Type

Expiration(4)

Dec. 31, 2004

Dec. 31, 2003

Dec. 31, 2004

$3.0 million DOE

B

07/31/07

$ 179

$ -

$ 179

$249.8 thousand Army

A

09/30/05

$ -

$ -

$ -

$1.0 million NYSERDA(1)

B

08/31/05

$ 105

$ 404

$ 806

$69.9 thousand Marine

A

03/31/05

$ -

$ -

$ -

$200 thousand NIST(2)

A

06/30/05

$ 110

$ -

$ 110

$250 thousand Harris

A

06/25/04

$ -

$ 175

$ -

$200 thousand ARL

A

04/30/04

$ 200

$ -

$ 200

$4.6 million NIST(3)

B

09/30/04

$ 446

$ 1,528

$ 3,342

(1)Total contract value is $1.048 million consisting of three Phases: Phase I for $500 thousand was from 3/12/02 thru 9/30/03; Phase II for $200 thousand was from 10/28/03 with a completion date of 10/31/04; and Phase III for $348 thousand commenced 8/23/04 and expires on 8/31/05. Phases I and II have been completed.

(2) This contract is a subcontract with CSMP under NIST.

(3)This contract is a joint venture with DuPont. DuPont's share of the contract revenue is $1.3 million.

(4) Dates represent the expiration of contract, not date of final billing.

Contract Type A - Fixed Price Contract.

Contract Type B - Shared Cost Contract.

28

Cost of Product Revenue:Cost of product revenue in the Test and Measurement Instrumentation segment for 2004 increased in comparison to the same period in 2003 by $.495 million, or 20.8%, to $2.877 million. The increase was directly due to the higher sales volume for 2004 and its product mix, which during 2004 included the shipment of two AutoScan metrology tools which had reduced carrying values due to the weak semiconductor market conditions over the last two years.

Gross profit as a percentage of product revenue increased to 61.8% for 2004 from 57.1% in the prior year. The gross profit percentage increase was primarily due to a five point increase in PBS product margins resulting from pricing escalations built into both U.S. Air Force contracts. Additionally, in general instruments, capacitance products showed a nine point increase in margins resulting from decreased material costs and improved assembly efficiencies. All of the other product lines showed at least a two point improvement in margins over the prior year. Further adding to the current year's improvement was the sale of two AutoScan metrology tools, which had reduced carrying values due to the weak semiconductor market conditions over the previous two years.

Funded Research and Product Development Expenses:Funded research and product development expenses in the New Energy segment increased by $.277 million or 7.4% to $4.040 million for 2004 in comparison to the same period in 2003.

The increased costs were attributable to the development of prototypes for Harris and costs incurred under new contracts with ARL for the delivery of micro fuel cell units and CSMP and DOE for the advancement of the consumer DMFC platform. Expenses were further increased by an accrual of estimated losses on contracts totaling $557 thousand. This accrual was required because, during 2004, MTI Micro entered into a fixed price-cost-type completion contract with the U.S. Army for $250 thousand and the forecast to complete this project exceeds the funding by $540 thousand and the forecast to complete another fixed price contract exceeded costs incurred through December 31, 2004 by $17 thousand. These costs were partially offset by decreased development costs related to the completion of the Phase II of the NYSERDA contract during 2003 and reduced costs related to the NIST contract as it was winding down during the third quarter of 2004.

Unfunded Research and Product Development Expense: Unfunded research and product development expenses increased by $4.335 million or 94.5% to $8.920 million for 2004 in comparison to the same period in 2003. This increase reflects a $4.251 million increase in the New Energy segment reflecting increased internal development costs directed at commercializing micro fuel cells, including costs for the development of our micro fuel cell system and development costs in connection with Gillette and potential commercial products. Unfunded research and product development costs include the cost of micro fuel cell products shipped due to the initial fuel cell units being low volume production. Cost of micro fuel cell products includes the direct material cost incurred in the manufacture of the products we ship. These costs consist primarily of production materials and fees paid to outside suppliers for subcontracted components and services. This increase also includes a $.084 million increase i n product development expenses in the Test and Measurement Instrumentation segment related to the continued development of the PBS-3300 and MTI-2100. The PBS-3300 is a smaller test cell system used for small turbines and props and the MTI-2100 is the newest version of the fiber-optic based vibration sensor.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses:Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $.488 million to $6.325 million for 2004 in comparison to the same period in 2003. This change is primarily the result of an increase of $.294 million in professional fees related to the Fletcher amendment, increased public relations costs of $.167 million, increased insurance costs of $.248 million, increased depreciation expense of $.186 million due to an increase in capital expenditures offset by a decrease in professional fees of $.427 million due to a business transaction that occurred during 2003.

Operating Loss:Operating loss for 2004 in comparison to the same period last year increased by $4.883 million to $13.592 million, a 56.1% increase. This increase in operating loss results primarily from increases in research and product development expenses and selling, general and administration expenses and decreases in funded research and development revenue in the New Energy segment partially offset by increases in gross profits from product revenues in the Test and Measurement Instrumentation segment.

Other Income: Revenue from sales of micro fuel cell products was $0 million for the years ended December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003. We defer recognition of initial micro fuel cell product-related revenue at the time of delivery and recognize this revenue as other income as the continued warranty obligations expire. The costs associated with the product and warranty obligations are expensed as they are incurred.

Our initial sales of low volume production Mobion®products are a customer specific arrangement that includes fuel cell systems and continued warranty support. While contract terms require payment upon delivery of the System and are not contingent on the achievement of specific milestones or other substantive performance, the continuing obligation to warranty results in the Company deferring recognition of product-related revenue and recognizing product-related revenue as other income when the warranty obligations expire. The warranty on the product is for a period of fifteen months.

29

During the fourth quarter of 2004, we received a purchase order for 50 Systems and delivered 25 Systems during December 2004. The product-related revenue associated with these 25 Systems is subject to warranty obligations and has been deferred. For the year ended December 31, 2004, we deferred revenue in the amount of $3,125 for these Systems. We had no System sales in 2003.

Gain on Sale of Securities Available for Sale:Results for 2004 included a $3.626 million gain on the sale of securities available for sale compared to a $7.483 million gain for the same period in 2003. The average selling price per share of Plug Power common stock was $9.33 for 2004. The average selling price per share of Plug Power and SatCon common stock was $5.07 and $1.75, respectively, for 2003.

Gain (Loss) on Derivatives:The Company recorded a gain of $.614 million and a loss of $.006 million on derivative accounting for 2004 and 2003, respectively. The 2004 gain relates to the embedded derivative for the purchase of Plug Power common stock, which is part of the 2004 private placement transaction, while the loss in 2003 related to warrants for the purchase of SatCon common stock held by the Company. Changes in derivative fair values for the embedded derivative and the SatCon warrants are calculated using the Black Scholes Option-Pricing Model.

Impairment Losses:In 2004 and 2003, the Company recorded a $0 and $.418 million charge for impairment losses for other than temporary declines in the value of certain securities available for sale.

Income Tax Benefit:The income tax benefit rate for 2004 and 2003 was 39%. The tax benefit rates are primarily due to losses generated by operations. The valuation allowance at December 31, 2004 and 2003 was $1.836 million. The Company determined that it was more likely than not that the ultimate recognition of certain deferred tax assets would not be realized.

Further, as a result of ownership changes in 1996, the availability of $1.014 million of net operating loss carry-forwards to offset future taxable income will be limited pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company has incurred significant losses as it continues to fund MTI Micro's DMFC product development and commercialization programs. The Company expects that losses will fluctuate from year to year and that such fluctuations may be substantial as a result of, among other factors, sales of securities available for sale, the operating results of MTI Instruments and MTI Micro, the availability of equity financing including the additional investment rights issued in connection with the 2004 private placement and the ability to attract government funding resources to offset research and development costs. As of December 31, 2005, the Company had an accumulated deficit of $81.718 million. During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company's results of operations resulted in a net loss of $15.094 million and used cash in operating activities totaling $12.572 million. This cash use in 2005 was funded primarily by cash and cash equivalents on hand as of December 31, 2004 of $22.545 million. The Compa ny expects to continue to incur losses as it seeks to develop and commercialize Mobion®fuel cell systems and it expects to continue funding its operations from current cash and cash equivalents, the sales of securities available for sale, proceeds, if any, from the exercise of additional investment rights issued in connection with the 2004 private placement or other equity financings and government program funding. The Company expects to spend approximately $7.8 million on research and development of Mobion® fuel cells and $1.1 million in research and development on MTI Instruments' products during 2006.

There can be no assurance that the Company will not require additional financing during 2006 or that any additional financing will be available to the Company on terms acceptable to the Company, if at all. Cash used in operations is expected to total approximately $16.0 million for 2006. Further, cash used for capital expenditures is expected to total approximately $2.5 million in 2006 and will consist of purchases for leasehold improvements, furniture, computer equipment, software and manufacturing and laboratory equipment. The Company believes it will have adequate resources to fund operations and capital expenditures through the second quarter of 2007 based on current cash and cash equivalents, current cash flow and revenue projections and the potential sale of securities available for sale at current market values. Proceeds from the sale of securities available for sale are subject to fluctuations in the market value of Plug Power. The Company may also seek to provide additional resources through an equity offering. Additional government revenues and Fletcher's potential exercise of additional investment rights totaling up to an additional $20 million could also provide additional resources, although with an exercise price of $6.023 per share it is unlikely that Fletcher will exercise its right unless our stock price increases. The Company anticipates that it will have to raise additional equity capital to fund its long-term business plan, regardless of whether Fletcher exercises any or all of its additional investment rights.

30

As of December 31, 2005, the Company owned 3,693,436 shares of Plug Power common stock.

Potential future sales of Plug Power securities will generate taxable income or loss, which is different from book income or loss, due to the tax bases in these assets being significantly different from their book bases. Book and tax bases as of December 31, 2005 are as follows:

  

Average

Average

Security

Shares Held

Book Cost Basis

Tax Basis

Plug Power

3,693,436

$1.78

$0.96

Plug Power stock is currently traded on the Nasdaq National Market and is therefore subject to stock market conditions. When acquired, these securities were unregistered. Plug Power securities are considered "restricted securities" as defined in Rule 144 and may not be sold in the future without registration under the Securities Act, unless in compliance with an available exemption there from.

Working capital was $24.465 million at December 31, 2005, a $10.347 million decrease from $34.812 million at December 31, 2004. This decrease is primarily the result of the use of cash in operations offset by increases in the market value and proceeds from sale of securities available for sale.

At December 31, 2005, the Company's order backlog was $.862 million, compared to $.480 million at December 31, 2004.

Inventory and accounts receivable (from product revenues) turnover ratios and their changes for the last two annual periods are as follows for the years ended December 31:

 

2005

2004

Change

Inventory

2.00

2.10

(.10)

Accounts receivable (from product revenues)

8.94

9.60

(.66)

The changes in the inventory and accounts receivable turnover ratios are the result of the volume and timing of sales. The Test and Measurement Instrumentation segment had lower monthly sales in December 2005 compared to December 2004.

Cash flow used by operating activities was $12.572 million in 2005 compared with $11.982 million in 2004. This cash use increase of $.590 million reflects increases in cash expenditures to fund operations at the New Energy segment, partially offset by balance sheet changes, which reflect the timing of cash payments and receipts.

Capital expenditures were $1.004 million in 2005, a decrease of $.830 million from the prior year. Capital expenditures in 2005 included computer equipment, demonstration equipment, software, and manufacturing and laboratory equipment. Outstanding commitments for capital expenditures as of December 31, 2005 totaled $129 thousand and include expenditures for lab and production equipment, leasehold improvements and computer equipment. The Company expects to finance these expenditures with current cash and cash equivalents, the sale of securities available for sale, equity financing and other sources, as appropriate and to the extent available.

Pursuant to additional investment rights, Fletcher has the right, but not the obligation, to purchase, in a single purchase or multiple purchases, up to an additional $20 millionvolatility of our common stock, at any time prior to December 31, 2006 atand a price per share equal to $6.023 (as adjusted from $6.34), which date and price may be extended and adjusted, respectively,proxy risk-free interest rate. Gains (losses) on derivatives are included in certain circumstances.

During 2005,“Gain (loss) on derivatives” in the Company sold 1,899,791 sharesConsolidated Statement of Plug Power common stock with proceeds totaling $1.969 million and gains totaling $10.125 million. These proceeds reflect the Company's previously announced strategy to raise additional capital through the sale of Plug Power stock in order to fund its micro fuel cell operations as well as Fletcher's exercise of its right to purchase Plug Power common stock from the Company. Taxes on the net gains are expected to be offset by the Company's operating losses. As of December 31, 2005, the Company estimates its remaining net operating loss carry forwards to be approximately $39.115 million.Operations.

 

31

Contractual Obligations

Contractual obligations as of December 31, 2005, under agreements with non-cancelable terms are as follows:

 

Payments Due by Period

 

Total

Less Than

1 Year

1-3

Years

3-5

Years

More than

5 Years

Contractual obligations:

     

Operating leases

$1,569

$ 639

$ 641

$ 289

$ -

Purchase obligations

1,850

1,689

161

-

 

License obligations(A), (B), (C)

3,500

250

500

750

2,000

Total

$6,919

$2,578

$1,302

$1,039

$2,000

(A)Once products are sold under the LANL license agreements, royalties will be based on 2% of the first $50 million of net sales, 1% on net sales in excess of $50 million but less than $100 million and .5% on net sales in excess of $100 million. License payments made in any year may be applied against royalties due and total annual fees in any year shall not exceed $1 million. Any royalties due shall not exceed 2% of net sales.

(B)Under the Strategic Alliance Agreement (the "Agreement") with Gillette, if MTI Micro sells fuel refills in the target market after its exclusivity obligations have expired, then MTI Micro will be required to pay Gillette royalties as defined in the Agreement. The Agreement is subject to confidential treatment as filed with the SEC.

(C) Under the NYSERDA contract, MTI Micro agreed to pay NYSERDA a royalty of 1.5% of the sales price of any product sold incorporating IP developed pursuant to the NYSERDA contract if the product is manufactured by a New York State manufacturer. This royalty increases to 5% if the manufacturer is not deemed to be a New York State manufacturer. In any event, the royalty is subject to a cap equal to two times the total contract funds paid by NYSERDA to MTI Micro as reduced to reflect any New York State jobs created by MTI Micro.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Pursuant to a financing transaction entered into between the Company and Fletcher on January 29, 2004, Fletcher has the right, but not the obligation, to purchase, in a single purchase or multiple purchases, up to an additional $20 million of our common stock at any time prior to December 31, 2006 at a price per share equal to $6.023 (as adjusted from $6.34), which date and price may be extended and adjusted, respectively, in certain circumstances. Fletcher also has the right to receive Company shares without payment upon the occurrence of certain events, including but not limited to, failing to register for resale with the SEC shares purchased by Fletcher on the agreed upon time table, a restatement of the Company's financial statements, change of control of the Company and issuance of securities at a price below Fletcher's purchase price. We have filed registration statements covering all of the shares purchased by Fletcher to date and in the event of any additional purchases we are similarly obli gated to file one or more registration statements covering resale of such shares. In Connection with the late effective date for the registration statement filed on January 6, 2004, the Company issued and registered 66,413 shares of common stock to Fletcher without any additional payment. At December 31, 2005, Fletcher owned 393,515 shares or 1.3% of the Company's common stock.

New Accounting Pronouncements

Effect of Recent Accounting Pronouncements: Pronouncements:

In November 2004,December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151,141R,Inventory Costs-an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4("FAS 151"), which is the result of its efforts to converge U.S. accounting standards for inventories with International Accounting Standards. SFAS No. 151 requires idle facility expenses, freight, handling costs and wasted material (spoilage) costs to be recognized as current-period charges. It also requires that allocation of fixed production overheads to the costs of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. SFAS No. 151 will be effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company does not believe that the impact of this standard will have Business Combinations—a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (Revised 2004)Share-Based Payment ("SFAS No. 123R"), which is a revision of FASB SFAS No. 123,Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. SFAS No. 123R addresses all forms of share-based payment ("SBP") awards, including shares issued under employee stock purchase plans, stock options, restricted stock and stock appreciation rights. In March 2005 the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 (SAB 107). SAB 107 expresses views of the SEC staff regarding the interaction between SFAS 123R and certain SEC rules. SFAS 123R focuses primarily on accounting for transactions in which an entity obtains employee services in share-based payment transactions. SFAS 123R requires public entities to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award. The grant-date fair value of employee share options and similar instruments will be estima ted using option-pricing models adjusted for the unique characteristics of those instruments. That cost will be recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award. In April 2005, the SEC delayed the implementation of SFAS 123R for

32

public companies until the first annual period beginning after June 15, 2005. SFAS 123R is required to be adopted by the Company as of January 1, 2006. The Company has not yet determined the impact of applying the various provisions of SFAS No. 123R. The effects of adopting this standard will depend on our future stock option activity and the term of the options.

The Company currently utilizes a closed form option-pricing model to measure the fair value of stock-based compensation for employees. SFAS 123R permits the use of this model or other models such as a lattice model. The Company has determined that it will use the Black-Scholes Option-Pricing model to measure the fair value of share-based grants to employees upon the adoption of SFAS 123R. The effect of expensing stock options in accordance with the original SFAS 123 is presented above. SFAS 123R also requires that the benefits associated with the tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost be reported as a financing cash flow, rather than as an operating cash flow as required under current literature. This presentation may reduce net operating cash flows and increase net financing cash flows in periods after the effective date. The amount of this excess tax deduction benefit was $0 thousand and $294 thousand in the twelve months ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The unvested val ue of share awards to be amortized into the operating statement is approximately $1.494 million as of December 31, 2005.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, Exchanges of Non-monetary Assets, an amendment of APB Opinion No. 29. SFAS No. 153 addresses the measurement of exchanges of non-monetary assets and redefines the scope of transactions that should be measured based on the fair value of the assets exchanged. SFAS No. 153 is effective for non-monetary asset exchanges in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company does not believe that the impact of this standard will have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In March 2005, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 47 Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations, which is an interpretationreplacement of FASB Statement No. 143, Account141, which significantly changes the principles and requirements for Asset Retirement Obligations. The interpretation requires a liability forhow the fair valueacquirer of a conditional asset retirement obligation be recognized ifbusiness recognizes and measures in its financial statements the fair valueidentifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree. The statement also provides guidance for recognizing and measuring the goodwill acquired in the business combination and determines what information to disclose to enable users of the liability can be reasonably estimated. The interpretationfinancial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. SFAS No. 141R is effective prospectively, except for years ending after December 15, 2005. The Company does not believe that the impact of this standard will have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In May 2005, SFAS No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections - replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3, (SFAS No. 154) was issued. SFAS No. 154 changes the accountingcertain retrospective adjustments to deferred tax balances, for and reporting of a change in accounting principle by requiring retrospective application to prior periods' financial statements of changes in accounting principle unless impracticable. SFAS No. 154 is effective for accounting changes made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. The2008. This statement will be effective for the Company doesfor fiscal year 2009. We have not believeyet determined the impact, if any, of this statement on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160,Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements—an amendments of ARB No. 51. SFAS No. 160 requires that accounting and reporting for minority interests will be recharacterized as noncontrolling interests and classified as a component of equity. SFAS No. 160 also establishes reporting requirements that provide sufficient disclosures that clearly identify and distinguish between the interests of the parent and the interests of the noncontrolling owners. SFAS No. 160 applies to all entities that prepare consolidated financial statements, except not-for-profit organizations, but will affect only those entities that have an outstanding noncontrolling interest in one or more subsidiaries or that deconsolidate a


subsidiary. This statement is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2008. This statement will be effective for us for our fiscal year beginning January 1, 2009. Based upon the December 31, 2007 balance sheet, the impact of this standard willadopting SFAS No. 160 would be to reclassify from $143,000 minority interests in consolidated subsidiaries to stockholders’ equity as a separate component of stockholders’ equity.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159,The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. SFAS No. 159 provides companies with an option to report selected financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected are reported in earnings at each subsequent reporting date. SFAS No. 159 is effective beginning January 1, 2008. The adoption of the provisions of SFAS No. 159 is not expected to have a material effect on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

In September 2006, the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In June 2005, the FASB's Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") reachedFASB issued SFAS No. 157,Fair Value Measurements. SFAS No. 157 establishes a consensus on Issue No. 05-6, Determining the Amortization Periodcommon definition for Leasehold Improvements (EITF 05-6). Thefair value to be applied to United States generally accepted accounting principles guidance requires that leasehold improvements acquired inrequiring use of fair value, establishes a business combination or purchased subsequent to the inception of a lease be amortized over the lesser of the useful life of the assets or a term that includes renewals that are reasonably assured at the date of the business combination or purchase. The guidanceframework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosure about such fair value measurements. This Statement is effective for periodsfiscal years beginning after June 29, 2005.November 15, 2007. This statement will be effective for the Company for its fiscal year beginning January 1, 2008. The adoption of EITF 05-6the provisions of SFAS No. 157 is not expected to have a material effect on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158,Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R). Among other items, SFAS No. 158 requires recognition of the over-funded or under-funded status of an entity’s defined benefit postretirement plan as an asset or liability in the financial statements, requires the measurement of defined benefit postretirement plan assets and obligations as of the end of the employer’s fiscal year, and requires recognition of the funded status of defined benefit postretirement plans in other comprehensive income. This Statement is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2006. Since we do not maintain any defined benefit or other postretirement plans, the adoption of this Statement for fiscal year 2007 did not have a significantmaterial effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.our Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

Item 7A: QuantitativeIn March 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 156,Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets—an amendment of FASBStatement No. 140,which provides guidance on accounting for separately recognized servicing assets and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

We develop productsservicing liabilities. In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 156, separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities must be initially measured at fair value, if practicable. Subsequent to initial recognition, we may use either the amortization method or the fair value measurement method to account for servicing assets and servicing liabilities within the scope of this Statement. Our adoption of this Statement in the United States and sell them worldwide. As a result, our financial results could be affected by factors such as changes in foreign exchange rates or weak economic conditions in foreign markets. Since our sales are currently priced in U.S. dollars and are translated to local currency amounts, a strengthening of the dollar could make our products less competitive in foreign markets. Interest income is sensitive to changes in the general level of U.S. interest rates, particularly since our investments are in cash equivalents. Based on the nature and current levels of our cash equivalents, however, we have concluded that there is no material market risk exposure.

As a result of holding securities available for sale, the Company is exposed to fluctuations in market value. The Company recognizes changes in market value through the balance sheet, however if an other than temporary market decline were to occur, it couldfiscal year 2007 did not have a material impacteffect on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

In February 2006, the Company's operating results.

The Company'sFASB issued derivatives have consistedSFAS No. 155,Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments—an amendment of warrantsFASBStatements No. 133 and rights140, to purchase shares of the Company's common stock and Plug Power common stock owned by the Company. Thepermit fair value of theremeasurement for any hybrid financial instrument that contains an embedded derivative that otherwise would require bifurcation in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 133,Accounting for the right to purchase Plug Power common stock was recordedDerivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.Our adoption of this Statement in the financial statement line titled "Derivative liability" until its exercise date during June 2005. Thisfiscal year 2007 did not have a material effect on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

33

derivative was valued quarterly using the Black Scholes Option-Pricing Model. The Company's held derivatives consisted of warrants to purchase SatCon common stock. These held derivatives expired on January 31, 2004. The fair value of the warrants to purchase SatCon common stock was based on estimates using the Black Scholes Option-Pricing Model. The Company recognizes changes in fair value through the operating statement line titled "Gain (loss) on derivatives." The Company does not use derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes.

Market risk represents the risk of changes in value of a financial instrument caused by fluctuations in interest rates and equity prices. The Company has performed a sensitivity analysis on its investments in Plug Power and its derivative financial instrument (Plug Power Investment Right). The sensitivity analysis presents the hypothetical change in fair value of the Company's financial investments as of the balance sheet date. Market risk is estimated as the potential change in fair value resulting from an immediate hypothetical one-percentage point parallel shift in the yield curve. The fair values of the Company's holdings in securities available for sale have been based on quoted market prices and its derivative financial instruments based on estimates using valuation techniques.

The fair market and estimated values of the Company's investments in Plug Power and derivatives and the calculated impact of a market price decrease of ten percent, is as follows:

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Holdings/

Estimated

Ten Percent

 

Balance at

Derivatives

Fair Market Value

Market Decrease

    

December 31, 2005

Plug Power

$ 18,947

$1,895

    

December 31, 2004

Plug Power

$ 34,175

$ 3,418

Derivative

$ 1,125

$ 113


Item 8: Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

The financial statements filed herewith are set forth on the Index to Consolidated Financial Statements on Page F-1 of the separate financial section, which follows page 4241 of this report and are incorporated herein by reference.

Selected Quarterly Financial Data

(Unaudited and in 000's except per share amounts)

 

1st

2nd

3rd

4th

2005

    

Product revenue

$ 1,403

$ 1,285

$ 1,428

$1,896

Funded research and development revenue

324

380

792

333

Gross profit - product revenue

801

768

865

1,197

Gross loss - funded research and development

(731)

(677)

(85)

(233)

Net loss

(6,054)

(2,793)

(1,909)

(4,338)

     

Loss per Share (Basic and Diluted):

    

Net loss

(.20)

(.09)

(.06)

(.14)

     

2004

    

Product revenue

$ 1,579

$ 1,231

$ 1,642

$3,078

Funded research and development revenue

388

191

175

286

Gross profit - product revenue

932

608

956

2,157

Gross loss - funded research and development

(766)

(350)

(706)

(1,178)

Net (loss) income

(242)

(1,363)

(3,393)

807

     

(Loss) Earnings per Share (Basic and Diluted):

    

Net (loss) earnings

(.01)

(.05)

(.12)

.03

 

34

(Unaudited and in thousands except per share amounts)

 

1st

 

2nd

 

3rd

 

4th

 

2006

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Product revenue

 

$

1,513

 

$

1,700

 

$

1,693

 

$

2,761

 

Funded research and development revenue

 

 

45

 

 

93

 

 

173

 

 

178

 

Gross profit – product revenue

 

 

974

 

 

974

 

 

1,043

 

 

1,776

 

Gross loss – funded research and development

 

 

(165

)

 

(37

)

 

(150

)

 

(311

)

Net loss

 

$

(3,431

)

$

(3,222

)

$

(3,678

)

$

(3,336

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loss per Share (Basic and Diluted):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss

 

$

(0.11

)

$

(0.10

)

$

(0.12

)

$

(0.10

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2007

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Product revenue

 

$

1,701

 

$

2,275

 

$

2,196

 

$

2,856

 

Funded research and development revenue

 

 

615

 

 

353

 

 

357

 

 

231

 

Gross profit – product revenue

 

 

963

 

 

1,459

 

 

1,348

 

 

1,828

 

Gross profit (loss) – funded research and development

 

 

391

 

 

(151

)

 

(334

)

 

(241

)

Net loss

 

$

(3,156

)

$

(2,487

)

$

(2,481

)

$

(1,451

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loss per Share (Basic and Diluted):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss

 

$

(0.08

)

$

(0.07

)

$

(0.07

)

$

(0.03

)

Item 9: Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.


Item 9A: Controls and Procedures

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures: The Company'sOur management, with the participation of the Company'sour chief executive officer and chief financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the Company'sMTI’s disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2005.2007. The term "disclosure“disclosure controls and procedures," as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act, means controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC'sSEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the company'scompany’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Management recognizesWe recognize that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and managementwe necessarily applies itsapply our judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Based on the valuation of the Company'sour disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2005, the Company's2007, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that, as of such date, the Company'sour disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting:There have been no changes in the Company'sour internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act, during the Company'sour fiscal quarter ended December 31, 20052007 that have materially affected, or are reasonable likely to materially affect the Company'sour internal control over financial reporting.

(b) Management'sManagement’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management of theour Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as that term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f). The Company'sOur internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Under the supervision and with the participation of the Company'sour management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, the Companywe conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of itsour internal control over financial reporting using the criteria set forth inInternal Control-IntegratedControl—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on our evaluation using the criteria set forth inInternal Control-IntegratedControl—Integrated Framework,our managementManagement has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2005.2007.

Our management's assessment

This annual report does not include an attestation report of the effectiveness of the Company'sour registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005 has been auditedreporting. Our report was not subject to attestation by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independentour registered public accounting firm as statedpursuant to temporary rules of the SEC that permit us to provide only Management’s report in their report, which is included herein at page F-2.this annual report.

/s/ Steven N. FischerPeng K. Lim

/s/ Cynthia A. Scheuer

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

(Principal Financial Officer)

 

Item 9B: Other Information

None.

 


PART III

 

35

PART III

Item 10: Directors, and Executive Officers of the Registrantand Corporate Governance

(a) Directors

Incorporated herein by reference is the information appearing under the captions "Information“Information about our Directors"Directors” and "Compliance“Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 "1934” in the Company'sour definitive Proxy Statement for its 2006our 2008 Annual Meeting of ShareholdersStockholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.SEC.

(b) Executive Officers

Incorporated herein by reference is the information appearing under the captions "Executive Officers"“Executive Officers” and "Compliance“Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 "1934” in the Company'sour definitive Proxy Statement for its 2006our 2008 Annual Meeting of ShareholdersStockholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.SEC.

Incorporated herein by reference is the information appearing under the caption "Board“Board of Director Meetings and Committees - Audit Committee"Committee” in the Company'sour definitive Proxy Statement for its 2006our 2008 Annual Meeting of ShareholdersStockholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.SEC.

Code of Ethics: The Company hasWe have adopted a Code of Ethics for employees, officers and directors. The Code of Ethics is intended to comply with Item 406 of Regulation S-K of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and with applicable rules of the NASDAQ Stock Market, Inc. The Code of Ethics as revised, will be filed as Exhibit 14.1 to the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.Nasdaq. A copy may be obtained at no charge by written request to the attention of theour Secretary of the Company at 431 New Karner Road, Albany, New York 12205. A copy of the Code of Ethics is also available on the Company'sour website at http://www.mechtech.com.

Incorporated herein by reference is the information appearing under the caption "Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 - Shareholder Communications with the Board of Directors."

Item 11: Executive Compensation

Incorporated herein by reference is the information appearing under the caption "Executive Compensation"“Executive Compensation” in the Company'sCompany’s definitive Proxy Statement for its 2006our 2008 Annual Meeting of ShareholdersStockholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.SEC.

Item 12: Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related ShareholderStockholder Matters

Incorporated herein by reference is the information appearing under the caption "Principal Shareholders"“Principal Stockholders” in the Company'sour definitive Proxy Statement for its 2006our 2008 Annual Meeting of ShareholdersStockholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.SEC.

Equity Compensation Plans

As of December 31, 2005, the Company has two2007, we have three equity compensation plans, each of which has been approved by our stockholders; the Mechanical Technology, Incorporated 1996 Stock Incentive Plan (the “1996 Plan”), 1999 Employee Stock Incentive Plan (the "1999 Plan"“1999 Plan”) and the 1996 Stock2006 Equity Incentive Plan (the "1996 Plan"“2006 Plan”), and together withto which we refer collectively as the 1999 Plan, the "Plans").Plans. See Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements referred to in Item 8 for a description of these plans. Plans.

The following table presents information regarding these plans:

Number of Securities To Be

Weighted Average Exercise

Number of Securities Remaining

 

 

Number of Securities To Be

Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding

Options, Warrants, Rights(1)

(a)

 

 

 

Weighted Average Exercise

Price of Outstanding

Options, Warrants, Rights

(b)

Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under

Equity Compensation Plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))

(c)

Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding

Price of Outstanding

Available for Future Issuance Under

Plan Category

Options, Warrants, Rights(1)(2)

Options, Warrants, Rights

Equity Compensation Plans

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

5,041,242

$3.76

1,363,214

6,213,566

$

3.24

1,265,733

(1)Under both the 1996, 1999 and 19992006 Plans, the securities available under the Plans for issuance and issuable pursuant to exercises of outstanding options may be adjusted in the event of a change in outstanding stock by reason of stock dividend, stock splits, reverse stock splits, etc.

(2)The 1996 Plan also provides for increases to securities available by 10% of any increase in shares outstanding, excluding shares issued under option plans.

Item 13: Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

Incorporated herein by reference is the information appearing under the caption "Certain“Certain Relationships and Related Transactions"Transactions” in the Company'sour definitive Proxy Statement for its 2006the 2008 Annual Meeting of ShareholdersStockholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.SEC.

Item 14: Principal Accountant Fees and Services

Incorporated herein by reference is the information appearing under the caption "Independent Accountants"“Independent Accountants” in the Company'sour definitive Proxy Statement for its 2006the 2008 Annual Meeting of ShareholdersStockholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

36


PART IV

Item 15: Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

15(a) (1)Financial Statements: The financial statements filed herewith are set forth on the Index to Consolidated Financial Statements on page F-1 of the separate financial section which accompanies this Report, which is incorporated herein by reference.

15(a) (2)Financial Statement Schedules: The following consolidated financial statement schedule for the years ended December 31, 2005, 20042006, and 20032007 is included pursuant to Item 15(d):

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Financial Statements Schedule;

Schedule II-II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts.

All other financial statement schedules not listed have been omitted because they are either not required, not applicable, or the information has been included elsewhere in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.

15(a) (3) Exhibits:The exhibits listed in the Exhibit Index immediately preceding the exhibits are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The following exhibits are filed as part of this Report:

Exhibit

Number

Number

Description

Description

1.1

Placement Agreement dated December 15, 2006 with Rodman & Renshaw, LLC. (20)

3.1

Certificate of Incorporation of the registrant, as amended and restated and amended. (3)(8)(9)restated.

3.23.3

By-Laws of the registrant, as amended and restated. (3)(25)

4.1

CertificateForm of Additional Investment RightsCommon Stock Purchase Warrant to be issued to Fletcher International, Ltd. (22)by the Company. (20)

10.1

Mechanical Technology Incorporated Restricted Stock Incentive Plan. (1)

10.14

Mechanical Technology, Incorporated 1996 Stock Incentive Plan for its December 20, 1996 Special Meeting of Shareholders. (2)Plan. (1)

10.21

Asset Purchase Agreement between Mechanical Technology and NYFM, Incorporated, dated as of March 31, 1998. (4)

10.30

Mechanical Technology, Incorporated 1999 Employee Stock Incentive Plan. (5)(2)

10.32

Stock Purchase Agreement, dated October 1, 1999, between the registrant, Ling Electronics, Inc., Ling Electronics, Ltd. and SatCon Technology Corporation. (6)

10.33

Securities Purchase Agreement, dated October 21, 1999, between the registrant and SatCon Technology Corporation. (6)

10.34

Mechanical Technology Incorporated Registration Rights Agreement, dated October 21, 1999, between the registrant and SatCon Technology Corporation. (6)

10.36

Mechanical Technology Incorporated Stock Purchase Warrant dated October 21, 1999. (6)

10.37

SatCon Technology Corporation Stock Purchase Warrant dated October 21, 1999. (6)

10.38

Lease dated August 10, 1999 between Carl E. Touhey and Mechanical Technology, Inc. (6)(3)

10.39

Registration Rights Agreement, dated November 1, 1999 by and among Plug Power Inc. and the registrant. (6)

37

Exhibit

Number

Description

10.41

Mechanical Technology Incorporated Stock Purchase Warrant dated January 31, 2000. (7)

10.42

SatCon Technology Corporation Stock Purchase Warrant dated January 31, 2000. (7)

10.43

Lease dated April 2, 2001 between Kingfischer L.L.C.Kingfisher LLC and Mechanical Technology, Inc. (10)(4)

10.44

First Amendment to lease dated March 13, 2003 between Kingfischer L.L.C.Kingfisher LLC and Mechanical Technology, Inc. (12)(5)

10.118

Exchange Agreement dated December 20, 2002 by and between First Albany Companies Inc. and Mechanical Technology Incorporated. (11)

10.119

Strategic Alliance Agreement, dated as of September 19, 2003, between The Gillette Company and MTI MicroFuel Cells Inc. (13)(6)

10.120

Funding Agreement, dated as of September 19, 2003, between the registrant and The Gillette Company. (13)

10.121

Agreement, dated January 26, 2004, between Mechanical Technology, Inc. and Fletcher International, Ltd. (15)(8)

10.122

Amendment No. 1 to the Main Agreement dated as of May 4, 2004 entered into by and between the registrant and Fletcher International, Ltd. (16)(9)

10.123

Amendment to the Strategic Alliance Agreement between The Gillette Company and MTI MicroFuel Cells Inc. dated August 18, 2004. (17)(10)

10.124

MTI MicroFuel Cells Inc. 2001 Employee, Director and Consultant Stock Option Plan (Amended and Restated as of September 23, 2004). (18)

10.125

MTI MicroFuel Cells Inc. 2001 Employee, Director and Consultant Stock Option Plan Stock Option Agreement (Updated September 23, 2004). (18)

10.126

MTI MicroFuel Cells Inc. 2001 Stock Option Agreement for Employees, Consultants and Directors. (18)

10.127

MTI MicroFuel Cells Inc. Notice of Exercise of Option (Updated September 23, 2004). (18)

10.128

Lease dated January 26, 2005 between 750 University LLC and MTI MicroFuel Cells Inc. (20)

10.129

Base SalariesSummary of Changes in Compensation of Named Executive Officers of the Registrant.

10.130

Cash Compensation for Non-Management Directors of the Registrant.

10.131

Amendment No. 2 to the Strategic Alliance Agreement between The Gillette Company and MTI MicroFuel Cells Inc. dated June 20, 2005. (21)(11)


10.132

Second Amendment to lease dated December 12, 2005 between Kingfisher, LLC and Mechanical Technology, Incorporated. (23)(12)

10.133

Employment Agreement dated December 20, 2005 between William P. Acker and MTI MicroFuel Cells Inc. (24)

10.134

Lease Termination Agreement fully executed on February 9, 2006 between 750 University Avenue, LLC and MTI MicroFuel Cells Inc. (25)

10.135

Employment Agreement dated March 6, 2006 between Russel Marvin and MTI MicroFuel Cells Inc. (26)(14)

38

Exhibit

Number

Description

10.136

Employment Agreement dated September 25, 2002 between Cynthia A. Scheuer and Mechanical Technology, Incorporated and MTI MicroFuel Cells Inc. (13)

10.137

Employment Agreement dated November 19, 2004 between Juan Becerra and MTI MicroFuel Cells Inc. (13)

10.139

Employment Agreement dated May 4, 2006 between Peng K. Lim and MTI MicroFuel Cells Inc. (16)

10.140

Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for the 1996 and 1999 Mechanical Technology, Inc. Stock Incentive Plans. (17)

10.141 (A)

Alliance Agreement dated May 16, 2006 between MTI MicroFuel Cells Inc. and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (18)

10.142

Third Amendment to lease dated August 7, 2006 between Kingfisher, LLC and Mechanical Technology, Incorporated. (18)

10.143 (A)

Amendment No. 3 to the Strategic Alliance Agreement dated September 13, 2006, between MTI MicroFuel Cells Inc. and The Gillette Company. (19)

10.144

Form of Subscription Agreement. (20)

10.145

Mechanical Technology, Incorporated 2006 Equity Incentive Plan. (15)

10.146

Separation Agreement dated March 20, 2007 between Russel Marvin and MTI MicroFuel Cells Inc. (21)

10.147

Employment Agreement dated March 27, 2007 between Robert Kot and MTI Instruments, Inc. (22)

10.148

Fourth Amendment to lease dated August 6, 2007 between Kingfisher LLC and Mechanical Technology, Incorporated. (23)

10.150

Future Collaboration Agreement dated October 22, 2007 between MTI MicroFuel Cells Inc. and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (24)

10.151

Employment Agreement dated April 3, 2006 between James K. Prueitt and MTI MicroFuel Cells Inc.

14.1

Code of Ethics. (13)

21

Subsidiaries of the Registrant. (14)(7)

2323.2

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm – PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.

31.1

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Steven N. Fischer.Peng K. Lim.

31.2

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Cynthia A. Scheuer.

32.1

Section 1350 Certification of Steven N. Fischer.Peng K. Lim.

32.2

Section 1350 Certification of Cynthia A. Scheuer.

Certain exhibits were previously filed (as indicated below) and are incorporated herein by reference. All other exhibits for which no other filing information is given are filed herewith:

  1. Filed as Exhibit 28.1

    (1)

    Filed as Appendix A to the registrant’s Definitive Proxy Statement Schedule 14A filed November 19, 1996.


    (2)

    Filed as an Exhibit to the registrant’s Proxy Statement, Schedule 14A, dated February 13, 1999.

    (3)

    Filed as an Exhibit to the registrant’s Form 10-K Report for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1999.

    (4)

    Filed as an Exhibit to our Form 10-K Report for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2001.

    (5)

    Filed as an Exhibit to the registrant’s Form 10-K Report for the year ended December 31, 2002.

    (6)

    Filed as an Exhibit to the registrant’s Form 10-Q Report for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2003.

    (7)

    Filed as an Exhibit to the registrant’s Form 10-K Report for the year ended December 31, 2003.

    (8)

    Filed as an Exhibit to the registrant’s Form 8-K Report dated January 27, 2004.

    (9)

    Filed as an Exhibit to the registrant’s Form 8-K Report dated May 4, 2004.

    (10)

    Filed as an Exhibit to the registrant’s Form 10-Q Report for the quarter ended September 30, 2004.

    (11)

    Filed as an Exhibit to the registrant’s Form 8-K Report dated June 20, 2005.

    (12)

    Filed as an Exhibit to the registrant’s Form 8-K Report dated December 12, 2005.

    (13)

    Filed as an Exhibit to the registrant’s Form 10-K Report for the year ended December 31, 2005.

    (14)

    Filed as an Exhibit to the registrant’s Form 8-K Report dated March 6, 2006.

    (15)

    Filed as an Exhibit to the registrant’s Proxy Statement, Schedule 14A, dated April 3, 2006.

    (16)

    Filed as an Exhibit to the registrant’s Form 8-K Report dated May 4, 2006.

    (17)

    Filed as an Exhibit to the registrant’s Form 8-K Report dated May 18, 2006.

    (18)

    Filed as an Exhibit to the registrant’s Form 10-Q Report for the quarter ended June 30, 2006.

    (19)

    Filed as an Exhibit to the registrant’s Form 10-Q Report for the quarter ended September 30, 2006.

    (20)

    Filed as an Exhibit to the registrant’s Form 8-K Report dated December 15, 2006.

    (21)

    Filed as an Exhibit to the registrant’s Form 8-K Report dated March 22, 2007.

    (22)

    Filed as an Exhibit to the registrant’s Form 8-K Report dated March 28, 2007.

    (23)

    Filed as an Exhibit to the registrant’s Form 10-Q Report for the quarter ended June 30, 2007.

    (24)

    Filed as an Exhibit to the registrant’s Form 8-K Report dated October 25, 2007.

    (25)

    Filed as an Exhibit to the registrant’s Form 8-K Report dated December 14, 2007.

    (A) Certain portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment filed with the registrant's Form S-8 Registration Statement No. 33-26326, filed December 29, 1988.

  2. Filed as Appendix A to the registrant's Definitive Proxy Statement Schedule 14A filed November 19, 1996.
  3. Filed as an Exhibit to the Proxy Statement, Schedule 14A, dated March 9, 1998.
  4. Filed as an Exhibit (bearing the same exhibit number) to the registrant's Form S-2 dated August 18, 1998.
  5. Filed as an Exhibit to the registrant's Proxy Statement, Schedule 14A, dated February 13, 1999.
  6. Filed as an Exhibit (bearing the same exhibit number) to the registrant's Form 10-K Report for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1999.
  7. Filed as an Exhibit (bearing the same exhibit number) to the registrant's Form 10-Q Report for its fiscal quarter ended December 31, 1999.
  8. Filed as an Exhibit to the Proxy Statement, Schedule 14A, dated February 22, 2000.
  9. Filed as an Exhibit to the Proxy Statement, Schedule 14A, dated March 19, 2001.
  1. Filed as an Exhibit (bearing the same exhibit number) to the registrant's Form 10-K Report for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2001.
  1. Filed as an Exhibit to the registrant's Form 13-D/A Report dated January 3, 2003.
  2. Filed as an Exhibit to the registrant's Form 10-K Report for the year ended December 31, 2002.
  3. Filed as an Exhibit to the registrant's Form 10-Q Report for its fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2003.
  4. Filed as an Exhibit to the registrant's Form 10-K Report for the year ended December 31, 2003.
  5. Filed as an Exhibit to the registrant's Form 8-K Report dated January 27, 2004.
  6. Filed as an Exhibit to the registrant's Form 8-K Report dated May 4, 2004.
  7. Filed as an Exhibit to the registrant's Form 10-Q Report for its quarter ended September 30, 2004.
  8. Filed as an Exhibit to the registrant's Form 8-K Report dated December 10, 2004.
  9. Filed as an Exhibit to the registrant's Form 8-K Report dated December 22, 2004.
  10. Filed as an Exhibit to the registrant's Form 10-K Report for the year ended December 31, 2004.
  11. Filed as an Exhibit to the registrant's Form 8-K Report dated June 20, 2005.
  12. Filed as an Exhibit to the registrant's Form 10-Q Report for its quarter ended June 30, 2005.
  13. Filed as an Exhibit to the registrant's Form 8-K Report dated December 12, 2005.
  14. Filed as an Exhibit to the registrant's Form 8-K Report dated December 20, 2005.
  15. Filed as an Exhibit to the registrant's Form 8-K dated February 9, 2006.
  16. Filed as an Exhibit to the registrant's Form 8-K dated March 6, 2006.

Securities and Exchange Commission.

39


Signatures

Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED

Date: March 14, 200627, 2008

By: /s/ Steven N. Fischer/s/ Peng K. Lim

Steven N. FischerPeng K. Lim

Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature

Signature

Title

Title

Date

Date

/s/ Steven N. Fischer

Steven N. FischerPeng K. Lim

Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board

of DirectorsDirector

March 14, 200627, 2008

Peng K. Lim

/s/ Cynthia A. Scheuer

Cynthia A. Scheuer

Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Secretary

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

March 14, 200627, 2008

/s/ Dale W. ChurchSteven N. Fischer

Dale W. ChurchSteven N. Fischer

Chairman and Director

March 14, 200627, 2008

/s/ Edward A. Dohring

Edward A. Dohring

Director

March 14, 2006

/s/Thomas J. Marusak

Thomas J. Marusak

Director

March 14, 200627, 2008

/s/ William P. Phelan

William P. Phelan

Director

March 14, 200627, 2008

/s/ E. Dennis O'ConnorO’Connor

E. Dennis O'ConnorO’Connor

Director

March 14, 200627, 2008

/s/ Walter L. Robb

Dr. Walter L. Robb

Director

March 14, 200627, 2008

 


40

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC

ACCOUNTING FIRM ON FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE

 

To the Board of Directors and ShareholdersStockholders

of Mechanical Technology, Incorporated

 

Our audits of the consolidated financial statements referred to in our report dated March 13, 2006,February 28, 2008 appearing on page F-2 of this Form 10-K of Mechanical Technology, Incorporated, also included an audit of the financial statement schedule listed in Item 15(a)(2) of this Form 10-K. In our opinion, this financial statement schedule presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements.

 

/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Albany,Buffalo, New York

March 13, 2006February 28, 2008


MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

Description

Balance at Beginning of Period

Additions Charged to

Costs and Expenses

Additions Charged to Other Accounts

Deductions

Balance at End of

Period

 

Allowance for doubtful accounts (accounts receivable) for the years ended:

December 31, 2005

 

$

58

 

$

 

$

 

$

(58

)

$

 

 

December 31, 2006

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

 

December 31, 2007

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

 

Includes accounts written off as uncollectible and recoveries.

 

Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets for the years ended:

December 31, 2005

 

$

1,836

 

$

9,087

 

$

 

$

 

$

10,923

 

 

December 31, 2006

 

$

10,923

 

$

7,915

 

$

(23

)

$

 

$

18,815

 

 

December 31, 2007

 

$

18,815

 

$

3,518

 

$

 

$

 

$

22,333

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Inventory reserve for the years ended:

 

December 31, 2005

 

$

67

 

$

75

 

$

9

 

$

(103

)

$

48

 

 

December 31, 2006

 

$

48

 

$

136

 

$

(1

)

$

(33

)

$

150

 

 

December 31, 2007

 

$

150

 

$

137

 

$

28

 

$

133

 

$

182

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

41

MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

 

 

 

Description

Balance at

beginning

of period

Additions

Charged to Charged

costs and to otherexpensesaccounts

 

 

Deductions

Balance

at end of

period

Allowance for doubtful accounts (accounts receivable) for the years ended:

December 31, 2005

$ 58

$ -

$ -

$ (58)

$ -

December 31, 2004

-

58

-

-

58

December 31, 2003

-

-

-

-

-

Includes accounts written off as uncollectible and recoveries.

Allowance for doubtful accounts (notes receivable) for the years ended:

December 31, 2005

$ -

$ -

$ -

$ -

$ -

December 31, 2004

660

-

(50)

(610)

-

December 31, 2003

660

-

-

-

660

Includes accounts written off as uncollectible and recoveries.

Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets for the years ended:

December 31, 2005

$1,836

$9,087

$ -

$ -

$10,923

December 31, 2004

1,836

-

-

-

1,836

December 31, 2003

1,836

-

-

-

1,836

Inventory reserve for the years ended:

December 31, 2005

$ 67

$ 75

$ 9

$ (103)

$ 48

December 31, 2004

8

107

28

(76)

67

December 31, 2003

30

175

(10)

(187)

8

42

MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Page

Page

Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

F-2

Consolidated Financial Statements:

Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20052006 and 20042007

F-3

Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2005, 20042006, and 20032007

F-4

Statements of Shareholders'Stockholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the

Years Ended December 31, 2005, 20042006, and 20032007

F-5

Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2005, 20042006, and 20032007

F-6

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

F-7 - F-38to F-34


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

F-1

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and ShareholdersStockholders of

Mechanical Technology, IncorporatedIncorporated:

We have completed integrated audits of Mechanical Technology Incorporated's 2005 and 2004 consolidated financial statements and of its internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, and an audit of its 2003 consolidated financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Our opinions, based on our audits, are presented below.

Consolidated financial statements

In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated financialbalance sheets and the related consolidated statements listed in the accompanying indexof operations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income (loss), and of cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Mechanical Technology, Incorporated and its subsidiaries at December 31, 20052006 and 20042007, and the results of their operations and their cashtheircash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2005 in2007in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company'sCompany’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit of financial statements includes examining, on a test basis, evi denceevidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Internal control over

The accompanying financial reporting

Also, in our opinion, management's assessment, included in Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A,statements have been prepared assuming that the Company maintained effective internal control overwill continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the financial reporting as of December 31, 2005 based on criteria established inInternal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on those criteria. Furthermore, in our opinion,statements, the Company maintained,has suffered recurring losses from operations and has a net capital deficiency that raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, based on criteria establishedregard to these matters are also described inInternal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the COSO. Note 1. The Company's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express opinions on management's assessment an d on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We conducted our audit of internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. An audit of internal control over financial reporting includes obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management's assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we consider necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinions.

A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and proceduresdo not include any adjustments that (i) pertain tomight result from the maintenanceoutcome of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the comp any's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.this uncertainty.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Albany,Buffalo, New York

March 13, 2006

F-2

MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

December 31, 2005 and 2004

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

2005

2004

Assets

Current Assets:

  

Cash and cash equivalents

$11,230

$22,545

Securities available for sale

18,947

17,678

Accounts receivable, less allowances of $0 in 2005 and $58 in 2004

998

1,772

Other receivables - related parties

3

3

Inventories, net

1,058

1,136

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

451

504

Total Current Assets

32,687

43,638

   

Securities available for sale - restricted

-

16,497

Property, plant and equipment, net

2,495

2,884

Deferred income taxes

6,085

3,811

Total Assets

$41,267

$66,830

Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity

   

Current Liabilities:

  

Accounts payable

$ 375

$ 13

Accrued liabilities

1,672

3,287

Accrued liabilities - related parties

2

-

Income taxes payable

65

40

Deferred income taxes

6,108

5,486

Total Current Liabilities

8,222

8,826

Long-Term Liabilities:

  

Derivative liability

-

1,125

Other credits

-

24

Total Liabilities

8,222

9,975

Commitments and Contingencies

  

Minority interests

129

1,271

Shareholders' Equity

  

Common stock, par value $.01 per share, authorized 75,000,000;

  

38,965,937 issued in 2005 and 38,650,949 issued in 2004

390

387

Paid-in-capital

122,095

121,033

Accumulated deficit

(81,718)

(66,624)

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income:

  

Unrealized gain on securities available for sale, net of tax

5,983

14,542

   

Restricted stock grants - unearned compensation

(80)

-

Common stock in treasury, at cost, 8,040,736 shares in 2005 and 2004

(13,754)

(13,754)

Total Shareholders' Equity

32,916

55,584

Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity

$ 41,267

$ 66,830

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

February 28, 2008

 

F-3

MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

For the Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003

(Dollars in thousands, except per share)

Year Ended

Year Ended

Year Ended

Dec. 31,

Dec. 31,

Dec. 31,

2005

2004

2003

Product revenue

$ 6,012

$ 7,530

$ 5,547

Funded research and development revenue

1,829

1,040

2,311

Total revenue

7,841

8,570

7,858

Operating costs and expenses:

Cost of product revenue

2,381

2,877

2,382

Research and product development expenses:

Funded research and product development

3,555

4,040

3,763

Unfunded research and product development

6,116

8,920

4,585

Total research and product development expenses

9,671

12,960

8,348

Selling, general and administrative expenses

10,887

6,325

5,837

Operating loss

(15,098)

(13,592)

(8,709)

Interest expense

-

-

(7)

(Loss) gain on derivatives

(10,407)

614

(6)

Gain on sale of securities available for sale

10,125

3,626

7,483

Impairment losses

-

-

(418)

Other income (expense), net

431

231

(74)

Loss from continuing operations before

income taxes and minority interests

(14,949)

(9,121)

(1,731)

Income tax (expense) benefit

(1,587)

3,564

669

Minority interests in losses of consolidated subsidiary

1,442

1,366

490

Loss from continuing operations

(15,094)

(4,191)

(572)

Income from discontinued operations (net of taxes

of $8 in 2003)

-

-

13

Net loss

$(15,094)

$(4,191)

$ (559)

(Loss) Earnings per Share (Basic and Diluted):

Loss from continuing operations

$ (.49)

$ (.14)

$ (.02)

Income from discontinued operations

-

-

-

Loss per share

$ (.49)

$ (.14)

$ (.02)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

F-4

MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITYBALANCE SHEETS

AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

For the Years Ended December 31, 2005, 20042006 and 20032007

(Dollars in thousands)

Year Ended

Year Ended

Year Ended

 

Dec. 31,

Dec. 31,

Dec. 31,

Common Stock

2005

2004

2003

Balance, beginning

$ 387

$ 358

$ 35,648

Change in par value to $.01 from $1 per share effective June 28, 2005

-

-

(35,291)

Issuance of shares - private placement

1

27

-

Issuance of shares - options

1

2

1

Stock-based compensation - shares

1

-

-

Balance, ending

$ 390

$ 387

$ 358

Paid-In Capital

   

Balance, beginning

$ 121,033

$ 104,126

$ 67,479

Change in par value to $.01 from $1 per share effective June 28, 2005

-

 

35,291

Private placement, net of expenses

(45)

15,159

-

Derivative tax asset

-

696

-

Issuance of shares - options

325

407

220

Stock-based compensation - shares

248

-

-

Stock-based compensation - options

634

-

-

MTI MicroFuel Cell investment

(100)

351

881

Compensatory options

-

-

32

Stock option exercises recognized differently for financial reporting and tax purposes

-

294

223

Balance, ending

$ 122,095

$ 121,033

$ 104,126

Accumulated Deficit

   

Balance, beginning

$(66,624)

$(62,433)

$(61,874)

Net loss

(15,094)

(4,191)

(559)

Balance, ending

$(81,718)

$(66,624)

$(62,433)

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss):

   

Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Securities Available for Sale, Net of Taxes

Balance, beginning

$ 14,542

$ 19,944

$ 13,170

Change in unrealized (loss) gain on securities available for sale (net of taxes of

$0 in 2005, $2,550 in 2004 and $6,705 in 2003)

(3,620)

(3,826)

10,057

Less reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income (net of taxes

of $3,293 in 2005, $1,051 in 2004 and $2,189 in 2003)

(4,939)

(1,576)

(3,283)

Balance, ending

$ 5,983

$ 14,542

$ 19,944

Restricted Stock Grants - Unearned Compensation

   

Balance, beginning

$ -

$ -

$ (40)

Issuance of shares

(125)

-

-

Grants amortization

45

-

40

Balance, ending

$ (80)

$ -

$ -

Treasury Stock

   

Balance, beginning

$(13,754)

$(13,729)

$(13,635)

Stock acquisition

-

(25)

(94)

Balance, ending

$(13,754)

$(13,754)

$(13,729)

Total Shareholders' Equity

$ 32,916

$ 55,584

$ 48,266

Total Comprehensive (Loss) Income:

Net loss

$ (15,094)

$ (4,191)

$ (559)

Other comprehensive (loss) income:

   

Change in unrealized (loss) gain on securities available for sale, net of taxes

(3,620)

(3,826)

10,057

Less reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income, net of taxes

(4,939)

(1,576)

(3,283)

Total comprehensive (loss) income

$ (23,653)

$ (9,593)

$ 6,215

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

F-5

MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

For the Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003

 

(Dollars in thousands)

Year Ended

Dec. 31,

2005

Year Ended

Dec. 31,

2004

Revised

Year Ended

Dec. 31,

2003

Operating Activities

Net loss (see Note 2)

$(15,094)

$ (4,191)

$ (559)

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used by operating activities:

Loss (gain) on derivatives

10,407

(614)

6

Loss on retirement of subsidiary treasury stock

-

-

5

Impairment losses

-

-

418

Gain on sale of securities available for sale

(10,125)

(3,626)

(7,483)

Depreciation and amortization

1,253

911

599

Minority interests in losses of consolidated subsidiary

(1,442)

(1,366)

(490)

Allowance for bad debts

(58)

58

-

Loss on disposal of fixed assets

130

38

26

Deferred income taxes and other credits

1,617

(3,563)

(671)

Deferred income taxes and other credits- discontinued operations (see Note 2)

-

-

8

Stock based compensation

1,003

8

72

Changes in operating assets and liabilities :

Accounts receivable

832

(868)

483

Other receivables - related parties

-

(3)

-

Inventories

78

164

78

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

53

10

161

Accounts payable

362

(679)

(68)

Income taxes payable

25

28

(80)

Accrued liabilities - related parties

2

(48)

(142)

Accrued liabilities

(1,615)

1,759

(15)

Net cash used by operating activities

(12,572)

(11,982)

(7,652)

Investing Activities

Purchases of property, plant and equipment

(1,004)

(1,834)

(1,070)

Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment

10

-

-

Proceeds from sale of subsidiary

-

-

-

Proceeds from sale of securities available for sale

1,969

4,479

11,654

Net cash provided by investing activities

975

2,645

10,584

Financing Activities

Gross proceeds from private placement

-

18,000

-

Costs of private placement

(45)

-

-

Proceeds from stock option exercises

327

409

221

Net proceeds from subsidiary stock issuance

-

2,194

2,001

Purchase of common stock for treasury

-

(25)

(94)

Financing costs

-

(1,076)

-

Net cash provided by financing activities

282

19,502

2,128

(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents

(11,315)

10,165

5,060

Cash and cash equivalents - beginning of year

22,545

12,380

7,320

Cash and cash equivalents - end of year

$ 11,230

$ 22,545

$12,380

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

December 31,

 

 

2006

 

2007

 

Assets

 

Current Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

14,545

 

$

7,650

 

Securities available for sale

 

 

10,075

 

 

4,492

 

Accounts receivable

 

 

1,613

 

 

1,369

 

Inventories, net

 

 

1,216

 

 

1,373

 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

 

442

 

 

329

 

Total Current Assets

 

 

27,891

 

 

15,213

 

Property, plant and equipment, net

 

 

2,926

 

 

2,159

 

Deferred income taxes

 

 

2,994

 

 

1,344

 

Total Assets

 

$

33,811

 

$

18,716

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

 

Current Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable

 

$

651

 

$

273

 

Accrued liabilities

 

 

2,470

 

 

2,121

 

Deferred revenue

 

 

866

 

 

117

 

Income taxes payable

 

 

90

 

 

11

 

Deferred income taxes

 

 

2,994

 

 

1,344

 

Total Current Liabilities

 

 

7,071

 

 

3,866

 

Long-Term Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Uncertain tax position liability

 

 

 

 

208

 

Derivative liability

 

 

3,664

 

 

696

 

Total Long-Term-Liabilities

 

 

3,664

 

 

904

 

Total Liabilities

 

 

10,735

 

 

4,770

 

Commitments and Contingencies

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Minority interests

 

 

205

 

 

143

 

Stockholders’ Equity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock, par value $0.01 per share, authorized 75,000,000; 46,084,678 issued in 2006 and 46,220,624 issued in 2007

 

 

461

 

 

462

 

Paid-in-capital

 

 

130,565

 

 

131,661

 

Accumulated deficit

 

 

(95,385

)

 

(105,066

)

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized gain on securities available for sale, net of tax

 

 

984

 

 

500

 

Common stock in treasury, at cost, 8,040,736 shares in 2006 and 2007

 

 

(13,754

)

 

(13,754

)

Total Stockholders’ Equity

 

 

22,871

 

 

13,803

 

Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

 

$

33,811

 

$

18,716

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

F-6

MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

For the Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2006, and 2007

(Dollars in thousands, except per share)

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

2005

 

2006

 

2007

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Product revenue

 

$

6,012

 

$

7,667

 

$

9,028

 

Funded research and development revenue

 

 

1,829

 

 

489

 

 

1,556

 

Total revenue

 

 

7,841

 

 

8,156

 

 

10,584

 

Operating costs and expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost of product revenue

 

 

2,381

 

 

2,900

 

 

3,430

 

Research and product development expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Funded research and product development

 

 

3,555

 

 

1,152

 

 

1,891

 

Unfunded research and product development

 

 

6,116

 

 

11,769

 

 

9,874

 

Total research and product development expenses

 

 

9,671

 

 

12,921

 

 

11,765

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

 

 

10,887

 

 

10,072

 

 

8,738

 

Operating loss

 

 

(15,098

)

 

(17,737

)

 

(13,349

)

Gain (loss) on derivatives

 

 

(10,407

)

 

182

 

 

2,967

 

Gain on sale of securities available for sale

 

 

10,125

 

 

4,289

 

 

2,549

 

Other income, net

 

 

431

 

 

286

 

 

224

 

Loss before income taxes and minority interests

 

 

(14,949

)

 

(12,980

)

 

(7,609

)

Income tax (expense)

 

 

(1,587

)

 

(1,895

)

 

(2,548

)

Minority interests in losses of consolidated subsidiary

 

 

1,442

 

 

1,208

 

 

582

 

Net loss

 

$

(15,094

)

$

(13,667

)

$

(9,575

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loss per Share (Basic and Diluted):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loss per share

 

$

(0.49

)

$

(0.43

)

$

(0.25

)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.


MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

For the Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2006, and 2007

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

2005

 

2006

 

2007

 

Common Stock

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, beginning

 

$

387

 

$

390

 

$

461

 

Issuance of shares – private placement

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

Issuance of shares – capital

 

 

 

 

60

 

 

 

Issuance of shares – anti-dilution penalty

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

Issuance of shares – stock options

 

 

1

 

 

7

 

 

 

Issuance of shares – restricted stock

 

 

1

 

 

1

 

 

1

 

Balance, ending

 

$

390

 

$

461

 

$

462

 

Paid-In Capital

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, beginning

 

$

121,033

 

$

122,095

 

$

130,565

 

Private placement, net of expenses

 

 

(45

)

 

 

 

 

Capital raise and warrant issuance, net of expenses

 

 

 

 

6,250

 

 

 

Issuance of shares – stock options

 

 

325

 

 

1,181

 

 

59

 

Share-based compensation

 

 

1,083

 

 

2,406

 

 

1,558

 

MTI MicroFuel Cell investment

 

 

(301

)

 

(1,284

)

 

(521

)

Elimination of unearned compensation due to change in accounting principle

 

 

 

 

(80

)

 

 

Issuance of shares – anti-dilution penalty

 

 

 

 

(3

)

 

 

Balance, ending

 

$

122,095

 

$

130,565

 

$

131,661

 

Accumulated Deficit

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, beginning

 

$

(66,624

)

$

(81,718

)

$

(95,385

)

Cumulative effect of adoption of FIN 48

 

 

 

 

 

 

(106

)

Net loss

 

 

(15,094

)

 

(13,667

)

 

(9,575

)

Balance, ending

 

$

(81,718

)

$

(95,385

)

$

(105,066

)

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized Gain (loss) on Securities Available for Sale, Net of Taxes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, beginning

 

$

14,542

 

$

5,983

 

$

984

 

Change in unrealized (loss) gain on securities available for sale (net of taxes of $0 in 2005, 2006, and 2007)

 

 

(3,620

)

 

(3,212

)

 

68

 

Less reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income (net of taxes of $3,293 in 2005, $1,913 in 2006 and $2,518 in 2007)

 

 

(4,939

)

 

(1,787

)

 

(552

)

Balance, ending

 

$

5,983

 

$

984

 

$

500

 

Restricted Stock Grants – Unearned Compensation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, beginning

 

 

 

 

(80

)

 

 

Elimination of unearned compensation due to change in accounting principle

 

 

 

 

80

 

 

 

Issuance of shares

 

 

(125

)

 

 

 

 

Grants amortization

 

 

45

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, ending

 

$

(80

)

$

 

$

 

Treasury Stock

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, beginning

 

$

(13,754

)

$

(13,754

)

$

(13,754

)

Balance, ending

 

$

(13,754

)

$

(13,754

)

$

(13,754

)

Total Stockholders’ Equity

 

$

32,916

 

$

22,871

 

$

13,803

 

Total Comprehensive (Loss):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss

 

$

(15,094

)

$

(13,667

)

$

(9,575

)

Other comprehensive (loss):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income, net of taxes

 

 

(4,939

)

 

(1,787

)

 

(552

)

Change in unrealized (loss) gain on securities available for sale, net of taxes

 

 

(3,620

)

 

(3,212

)

 

68

 

Total comprehensive (loss)

 

$

(23,653

)

$

(18,666

)

$

(10,059

)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.


MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

For the Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2006, and 2007

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

2005

 

2006

 

2007

 

Operating Activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss

 

$

(15,094

)

$

(13,667

)

$

(9,575

)

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Gain) loss on derivatives

 

 

10,407

 

 

(182

)

 

(2,967

)

Gain on sale of securities available for sale

 

 

(10,125

)

 

(4,289

)

 

(2,549

)

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

1,253

 

 

1,101

 

 

1,129

 

Minority interests in losses of consolidated subsidiary

 

 

(1,442

)

 

(1,208

)

 

(582

)

Allowance for bad debts

 

 

(58

)

 

(1

)

 

 

Loss on disposal of fixed assets

 

 

130

 

 

40

 

 

39

 

Deferred income taxes

 

 

1,617

 

 

1,890

 

 

2,518

 

Stock based compensation

 

 

1,003

 

 

2,406

 

 

1,558

 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable

 

 

832

 

 

(614

)

 

244

 

Other receivables – related parties

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

Inventories

 

 

78

 

 

(158

)

 

(157

)

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

 

53

 

 

9

 

 

113

 

Accounts payable

 

 

362

 

 

277

 

 

(379

)

Income taxes payable

 

 

25

 

 

25

 

 

23

 

Deferred revenue

 

 

(359

)

 

746

 

 

(749

)

Accrued liabilities - related parties

 

 

2

 

 

(2

)

 

 

Accrued liabilities

 

 

(1,256

)

 

918

 

 

(349

)

Net cash used by operating activities

 

 

(12,572

)

 

(12,706

)

 

(11,683

)

Investing Activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchases of property, plant and equipment

 

 

(1,004

)

 

(1,574

)

 

(414

)

Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment

 

 

10

 

 

2

 

 

12

 

Proceeds from sale of securities available for sale

 

 

1,969

 

 

6,249

 

 

5,130

 

Net cash provided by investing activities

 

 

975

 

 

4,677

 

 

4,728

 

Financing Activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross proceeds from capital raise and warrants issued

 

 

 

 

10,900

 

 

 

Costs of private placement

 

 

(45

)

 

 

 

 

Cost of capital raise

 

 

 

 

(744

)

 

 

Proceeds from stock option exercises

 

 

327

 

 

1,188

 

 

60

 

Net cash provided by financing activities

 

 

282

 

 

11,344

 

 

60

 

(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents

 

 

(11,315

)

 

3,315

 

 

(6,895

)

Cash and cash equivalents - beginning of year

 

 

22,545

 

 

11,230

 

 

14,545

 

Cash and cash equivalents - end of year

 

$

11,230

 

$

14,545

 

$

7,650

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.


MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

  1. Nature of Operations
  2. 1.

    Nature of Operations

    Description of Business

    Mechanical Technology, Incorporated, ("MTI"(“MTI” or the "Company"“Company”), a New York corporation, was incorporated in 1961. MTI operates in two segments,segments; the New Energynew energy segment which is conducted through MTI MicroFuel Cells Inc. ("(“MTI Micro"Micro”), a majority-ownedmajority owned subsidiary, and the Testtest and Measurement Instrumentationmeasurement instrumentation segment, which is conducted through MTI Instruments, Inc. ("(“MTI Instruments"Instruments”), a wholly owned subsidiary.

    At its MTI Micro subsidiary, the CompanyCompany’s Mobion® cord-free power packs are being developed to replace current lithium ion and similar rechargeable battery systems in many handheld electronic devices for the military and consumer markets. Mobion® power packs are based on direct methanol fuel cell technology which has been recognized as enabling technology for advanced portable power sources by the scientific community and industry analysts. As the need for advancements in portable power increases, MTI Micro is primarily focused on the development and commercialization of advanceddeveloping Mobion® cord-free rechargeable power pack technology for portable electronics. MTI Micro has developed a patented, proprietary direct methanol fuel cell ("DMFC") technology called Mobion®, which generates electrical power using up to 100% methanol as fuel. MTI Micro's Mobion® technology is intended to replace current lithium-ion and similar rechargeable battery systems currently used by original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) in many hand held electronic devices such as PDAs, Smartphones and different accessories. The Company formed MTI Micro as a subsidiary on March 26, 2001 and currently owns approximately 90% ofsuperior solution for powering the outstanding common stock of MTI Micro.multi-billion dollar portable electronics market.

    At its MTI Instruments subsidiary, the Company designs, manufactures,continues to be a worldwide supplier of precision non-contact physical measurement solutions, condition based monitoring systems, portable balancing equipment and sells high-performance testsemiconductor wafer inspection tools. MTI Instruments’ products use a comprehensive array of technologies to solve complex real world applications in numerous industries including manufacturing, semiconductor, commercial/military aviation, automotive and measurement instruments and systems. MTI Instruments was incorporated as a subsidiary on March 8, 2000 and has three product groups: general dimensional gaging, semiconductor and aviation. Thesedata storage. The Company’s products consist of electronic computerized gaginggauging instruments for position, displacement and vibration applications forwithin the design, manufacturingmanufacturing/production, test and testresearch markets; semiconductor products for wafer characterization of semi-insulating and semi-conducting wafers forwithin the semiconductor market;industry; and engine balancing and vibration analysis systems for both military and commercial aircraft.

    Liquidity and Going Concern

    The Company has incurred significant losses as it continues to fund MTI Micro's DMFCMicro’s direct methanol fuel cell product development and commercialization programs. The Company expects thatprograms, and has an accumulated deficit of $105,066 thousand and working capital of $11,347 thousand at December 31, 2007. Because of these losses, will fluctuate from year to yearlimited current cash, cash equivalents and that such fluctuations may be substantial as a result of, among other factors, sales of securities available for sale, negative cash flows and accumulated deficit, the operating resultsreport of MTI Instruments and MTI Micro, the availability of equity financing includingCompany’s independent registered public accounting firm for the additional investment rights issued in connection withyear ended December 31, 2007 expressed substantial doubt about the 2004 private placement and theCompany’s ability to attract government funding resources to offset research and development costs. The Company expects to continue to incur losses as it seeks to develop and commercialize Mobion®fuel cell systems and it expects to continue funding its operations from current cash and cash equivalents, the sales of securities available for sale, proceeds, if any, from the exercise of additional investment rights issued in connection with the 2004 private placement or other equity financ ings and government program funding. The Company may also seek to provide additional resources through an equity offering. Additional government revenues and Fletcher's potential exercise of additional investment rights totaling up to an additional $20 million could also provide additional resources although with an exercise price of $6.023 per share it is unlikely that Fletcher will exercise its right unless our stock price increases. The Company anticipates that it will have to raise additional equity capital to fund its long-term business plan, regardless of whether Fletcher exercises any or all of its additional investment rights.

    Pursuant to additional investment rights, Fletcher has the right, but not the obligation, to purchase, in a single purchase or multiple purchases, up to an additional $20 million of our common stock at any time prior to December 31, 2006 at a price per share equal to $6.023 (as adjusted from $6.34), which date and price may be extended and adjusted, respectively, in certain circumstances.going concern.

    During 2005,2007, the Company sold 1,899,7911,452,770 shares of Plug Power Inc. (“Plug Power”) common stock with proceeds totaling $1.969 million$5,130 thousand and gains totaling $10.125 million.$2,549 thousand. These proceeds reflect the Company'sCompany’s previously announced strategy to raise additional capital through the sale of Plug Power stock in order to fund its micro fuel cell operations as well as Fletcher's exercise of its right to purchase Plug Power common stock from the Company.MTI Micro operations.

     At December 31, 2005,

    Based on the Company hadCompany’s projected cash requirements for operations and capital expenditures for 2008 and its current cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities available for sale in the amount of $30.177 million and working capital of $24.465 million. The failure to raise the funds necessary to finance our future cash requirements or consummate future acquisitions could adversely affect the Company's ability to pursue its strategy and could negatively affect the Company's operations in future periods.Management$12,142 thousand at December 31, 2007, management believes it will have adequate resources to fund operations and capital expenditures for at least the next twelve months based on current cash and cash equivalents, current cash flow requirements, revenue and revenueexpense projections and the potential sale of securities available for sale at current market values.

    However, the Company may need to do one or more of the following to raise additional resources, or reduce its cash requirements:

    reduce its current expenditure run-rate;

    sell additional shares of Plug Power;

    obtain additional government or private funding of the Company’s direct methanol fuel cell research, development, manufacturing readiness and commercialization;

    sell operating divisions of the Company; or

    secure additional equity financing.

    There is no guarantee that such resources will be available to the Company on terms acceptable to it, or at all, or that such resources will be received in a timely manner, if at all, or that the Company will be able to reduce its expenditure run-rate without materially and adversely affecting its business.

    F-7


    MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

    NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

  3. 2.Accounting Policies

  4. Principles of Consolidation

    The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its majority-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompanyinter-company transactions are eliminated in consolidation.

    Minority interest in subsidiaries consists of equity securities issued by a subsidiary of the Company. No gain or loss was recognized as a result of the issuance of these securities, and the Company owned a majority of the voting equity of the subsidiary both before and after the transactions. The Company reflects the impact of the equity securities issuances in its investment in subsidiary and additional paid-in-capital accounts for the dilution or anti-dilution of its ownership interest in the subsidiary.

    Use of Estimates

    The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) which requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

    Fair Value of Financial Instruments

    The Company'sCompany’s financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities, accounts receivable, unbilled contract costs and fees, warrants to purchase shares of common stock (which expired January 31, 2004)derivatives and accounts payable. The estimated fair valuevalues of these financial instruments approximate their carrying values at December 31, 20052006 and 2004.2007. The estimated fair values have been determined through information obtained from market sources, where available, or Black-Scholes Option-PricingOption Pricing model valuations.

    Accounting for Derivative Instruments

    The Company accounts for derivative instruments and embedded derivative instruments in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS"(“SFAS”) No. 133,Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended. The amended by SFAS No. 138,Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities,which establishes a model for accounting for derivatives and hedging activities. These standards requirestandard requires an entity to recognize all derivatives as either assets or liabilities in the statement of financial position and measure these instruments at fair value. Fair value is estimated using the Black Scholes Option-PricingBlack-Scholes Option Pricing model. The Company also follows Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF"(“EITF”) Issue No. 00-19,Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to and Potentially Settled in, a Company'sCompany’s Own Stock, which requires freestanding contracts that are settled in a company'scompany’s own stock, including common stock warrants, to be designat eddesignated as an equity instrument, asset or a liability. Under the provisions of EITF Issue No. 00-19, a contract designated as an asset or a liability must be carried at fair value, with any changes in fair value recorded in the results of operations. A contract designated as an equity instrument mustcan be included withinin equity, andwith no fair value adjustments are required.

     

    F-8

    MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

    NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

    The Company held or has outstanding as of December 31, the following derivative financial instruments:

     

    2005

    2004

    Expiration

    Derivatives issued:

       

    Warrants, exercisable beginning February 5, 2005, to purchase the Company's common

       

    stock issued to Chicago Investment Group, L.L.C. at a purchase price of $10.572 per share

    28,377

    28,377

    February 5, 2006

        

    Second Investment Right, exercisable beginning December 22, 2004, to purchase the Company's

       

    common stock issued to Fletcher International, Ltd. at a purchase price of $6.023 per share

       

    through December 31, 2006(1)(3)

    3,320,604

    3,154,575

    December 31, 2006

        

    Plug Power Investment Right, exercisable at any time from June 1, 2005 through

       

    December 31, 2006 to purchase a number of the Company's shares of Plug Power common

       

    stock (to the extent of the number of shares remaining in escrow pursuant to the agreement)

       

    equal to $10,000,000 divided by the prevailing price per share of Plug Power common stock(1)

    -

    (2)

    December 31, 2006

        

    (1) The Company and Fletcher International, Ltd. entered into an amended private placement agreement on May 4, 2004 (see Note 11 - Shareholders' Equity).

    (2) The exercise price for the Plug Power Investment Right was $10,000,000 less the positive difference between $18,000,000 and the product of the 2,680,671 shares multiplied by the prevailing price per share of our common stock on the date Fletcher elects to exercise such right, all divided by the quotient obtained by dividing 10,000,000 by the prevailing price of Plug Power common stock on the date Fletcher elects to exercise such right (see Note 11- Shareholders' Equity). This right was fully exercised on June 24, 2005.

    (3)The Company incurred a registration penalty during March 2005, which resulted in a reduction in the exercise price for the Second Investment Right from $6.34 to $6.023 per share.

    The Plug Power Investment Right is legally detached and separate. In accordance with EITF 00-19, since this contract is indexed not only to MTI's stock but also to Plug Power's stock and it settles in Plug Power stock and not MTI stock, this contract is not solely indexed to the Company's stock in accordance with the guidance in EITF 01-6 and as a result is a derivative. The contract meets the definition of a derivative under paragraph 6 of FAS 133. Management considered whether or not the contract would be eligible for a scope exception described in paragraph 11.a. of FAS 133 relating to instruments indexed to a company's own stock and determined that the contract is not eligible for this scope exception.

    The Second Investment Right meets the criteria of SFAS No. 133, paragraph 11, as well as guidance in EITF 00-19 and EITF 01-06. The Right is indexed to the Company's stock and requires settlement in shares and because this right was part of the initial Fletcher investment, it is part of the original investment's fair value and is recorded as permanent equity and is not separately valued.

    The Plug Power Investment Right, prior to its exercise, wasasset/liability derivatives are valued on a quarterly basis using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing model and upon its exercise on June 24, 2005 was valued using the intrinsic value method.model. Significant assumptions used in the valuation includedinclude exercise dates, closing stockmarket prices for the Company’s common stock, of MTI and Plug Power, volatility of the Company’s common stock, of MTI and Plug Power,proxy risk-free interest rate and estimated number of shares in escrow. (Losses) gainsrates. Gains (losses) on derivatives are included in "(Loss) gain“Gain (loss) on derivatives"derivatives” in the Consolidated StatementsStatement of Operations.

    On June 24, 2005, Fletcher International, Ltd. ("Fletcher") notified the Company of Fletcher's election to exercise in full its right to purchase from the Company certain shares of common stock of Plug Power. As a result of this election, Fletcher purchased 1,799,791 shares of Plug Power common stock from the Company at a price of $0.7226 per share, with proceeds to the Company of $1.301 million. This transaction closed on June 28, 2005 and, in connection with this exercise, the Company recognized a loss on the derivative immediately prior to exercise of $7.173 million and a gain on the sale of Plug Power common shares of $9.635 million.

    Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

    Trade accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount and do not bear interest. TheAn allowance for doubtful accounts, is ourif necessary, represents the Company’s best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in ourits existing accounts receivable. We determineThe Company determines the allowance based on historical write-off experience and current exposures identified. We review ourThe Company reviews its allowance for doubtful accounts monthly. Past due balances over 90 days and over a specified amount are reviewed individually for collectibility.collectability. All other balances are reviewed on a pooled basis by type of receivable. Account balances are charged off against the allowance when we feelthe Company believes it is probable the receivable will not be recovered. We doThe Company does not have any off-balance-sheet credit exposure related to ourits customers.

     

    F-9

    MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

    NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

    Inventories

    Inventories are valued at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market. The Company provides estimated inventory allowances for excess, slow moving and obsolete inventory as well as inventory whose carrying value is in excess of net realizable value.


    MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

    NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

    Property, Plant, and Equipment

    Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost and depreciated using primarily the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives:

    Leasehold improvements

    Lesser of the life of the lease or the useful life of the improvement

    Computers and related software

    3 to 5 years

    Machinery and equipment

    23 to 10 years

    Office furniture, equipment and fixtures

    2 to 10 years

    Significant additions or improvements extending assets'assets’ useful lives are capitalized; normal maintenance and repair costs are expensed as incurred. The costs of fully depreciated assets remaining in use are included in the respective asset and accumulated depreciation accounts. When items are sold or retired, related gains or losses are included in net income (loss). income.

    Income Taxes

    The Company accounts for taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109,Accounting for Income Taxes(“SFAS No. 109”), which requires the

    use of the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under the asset and liability method, deferred income taxes are recognized for the tax consequences of "temporary differences"“temporary differences” by applying enacted statutory tax rates applicable for future years to differences between financial statement and tax bases of existing assets and liabilities. Under SFAS No. 109, the effect of tax rate changes on deferred taxes is recognized in the income tax provision in the period that includes the enactment date. The provision for taxes is reduced by investment and other tax credits in the years such credits become available. A valuation allowance is recorded to reduce the carrying amounts of deferred tax assets unless it is more likely than not that suchthose assets will be realized.

    Effective January 1, 2007, the Company adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation (FIN) No. 48,Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109. FIN 48 contains a two-step approach to recognizing and measuring uncertain tax positions (tax contingencies) accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 109. The first step is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence indicates it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on audit, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. The second step is to measure the tax benefit as the largest amount which is more than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. The Company considers many factors when evaluating and estimating its tax positions and tax benefits, which may require periodic adjustments and which may not accurately forecast actual outcomes.

    Revenue Recognition

    The Company applies the guidance within SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin ("SAB"(“SAB”) No. 104,Revenue Recognition(“SAB No. 104”)in the evaluation of its contracts to determine when to properly recognize revenue. Under SAB No. 104, revenue is recognized when title and risk of loss have passed to the customer, there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, the fee is fixed or determinable, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the sales price is determinable, and collectibilitycollectability is reasonably assured.

    Product Revenue

    Product revenue is recognized when there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, the collection of a fixed fee is probable or determinable, delivery of the product to the customer or distributor has occurred, at which time title generally is passed to the customer or distributor, all of which generally occur upon shipment of the product. If the product requires installation to be performed by the Company, all revenue related to the product is deferred and recognized upon the completion of the installation. If the product requires specific customer acceptance, revenue is deferred until customer acceptance occurs or the acceptance provisions lapse, unless the Company can objectively and reliably demonstrate that the criteria specified in the acceptance provisions are satisfied.

    The Company defers recognition of its initial micro fuel cell product-related revenue at the time of delivery and recognizes revenue as the continued warranty obligations expire. The costs associated with the product and warranty obligations are expensed as they are incurred. The Company's initial shipment during 2004 of its micro fuel cell product is a customer specific arrangement that includes fuel cell systems and continued warranty support. While contract terms require payment upon delivery of the fuel cell system and are not contingent on the achievement of specific milestones or other substantive performance, the continuing obligation to warranty the product results in the Company deferring recognition of product-related revenue and recognizing product-related revenue when the warranty obligations expire. The warranty on the product is for a period of fifteen months. When micro fuel cell product-related revenue qualifies for revenue recognition it will be recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Operations in the line titled "Other income (expense), net."

    As the Company gains commercial experience, including field experience relative to warranty based on the sales of its initial products, in future periods, the Company may recognize product-related revenue upon delivery of the product or may continue to defer recognition, based on application of appropriate guidance within SAB No. 104, or changes in the manner contractual agreements are structured, including agreements with distribution partners.

    F-10

    MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

    NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

    MTI Instruments, Inc. ("MTI Instruments"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of MTI, currently has distributor agreements in place for (1) the domestic sale of its semiconductor products and (2) for the international sale of general instrument and semiconductor products in certain global regions. Such agreements grant a distributor the right of first refusal to act as distributor for such products in the distributor'sdistributor’s territory. In return, the distributor agrees to not market other products which are considered by MTI Instruments to be in direct competition with MTI Instruments'Instruments’ products. The distributor is allowed to purchase MTI Instruments'Instruments’ equipment at a price which is discounted off the published domestic/international list prices. Such list prices can be adjusted by MTI Instruments during the term of the distributor agreement, but MTI Instruments must provide advance notice at least 90 days before the price adjustment goes into effect. Generally, pa ymentpayment terms with the distributor are standard net 30 days; however, on occasion, extended payment terms have been granted. Title toand risk of loss of the product passes to the distributor upon delivery to the independent carrier (standard FOB“free-on-board” factory), and the distributor is responsible for any required training and/or service with the end-user. The sale (and subsequent payment) between MTI Instruments and the distributor is not contingent upon the successful resale of the product by the distributor. Distributor sales are covered by MTI Instruments'Instruments’ standard one-year warranty and there are no special return policies for distributors.


    MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

    NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

    Some of MTI Instruments'Instruments’ direct sales, particularly sales of semi-automatic and fully-automated semiconductor metrology equipment, or rack-mounted vibration systems, involve on-site customer acceptance and/or training.installation. In those instances, revenue recognition does not take place at time of shipment. Instead, MTI Instruments recognizes the sale after the unit is installed and/or training is performed and an on-site acceptance is given by the customer. Agreed-upon acceptance terms and conditions, if any, are negotiated at the time of purchase.

    Funded Research and Development Revenue

    The Company performs funded research and development for government agencies and commercial companies under both cost reimbursement and fixed-price contracts. Cost reimbursement contracts provide for the reimbursement of allowable costs. On fixed-price contracts, revenue is generally recognized on the percentage of completion method based upon the proportion of costs incurred to the total estimated costs for the contract. Revenue from reimbursement contracts is recognized as the services are performed. In each type of contract, the Company generally receives periodic progress payments or payments upon reaching interim milestones. When the current estimates of total contract revenue for commercial development contracts indicate a loss, a provision for the entire loss on the contract is recorded. Any losses incurred in performing funded research and development projects are recognized as research and development expense as incurred. When government agencies are providing funding they do not expect the government to be the only significant end user of the resulting products. These contracts do not require delivery of products that meet defined performance specifications, but are best efforts arrangements to achieve overall research and development objectives. Included in accounts receivable are billed and unbilled work-in-progress on contracts. Billings in excess of contract revenues earned are recorded as deferred revenue. While the Company'sCompany’s accounting for government contract costs is subject to audit by the sponsoring entity, in the opinion of management, no material adjustments are expected as a result of such audits. Adjustments are recognized in the period made.

    Commercial Research and Prototype Agreement Income

    The Company also applies the guidance in SAB No. 104 in the evaluation of commercially funded fuel cell research and prototype agreements in order to determine when to properly recognize income. Payments received in connection with commercial research and prototype agreements are deferred and recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the agreement for service-related payments, and for milestone and prototype delivery payments, if and when achieved, revenue is deferred and recognized on a straight-line basis over the remaining term of the agreement. Under this policy, when revenue qualifies for recognition it will be recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Operations in the line “Funded research and development revenue.” The costs associated with research and prototype-producing activities are expensed as incurred. Expenses in an amount equal to revenues recognized are reclassified from “Unfunded research and product development” to “Funded research and product development” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

    Information regarding MTI Micro’s government and private companycommercial funded research and development contracts is as follows:

    (Dollars in thousands, except contract values)

    Contract

    Contract and Expected Revenues

    Type

    Expiration(6)

    $3.0 million DOEContract Name

    B

    Expiration (1)

    $3,000 thousand DOE(2)

    09/30/08

    $1,250 thousand NYSERDA(3)

    06/30/06

    $1,000 thousand Samsung(4)

    07/31/07

    $470418 thousand SAFT(1)(5)

    A

    09/30/

    12/31/06

    $1.250 million NYSERDA(2)250 thousand ARL

    B

    06/30/06

    $249.8 thousand Army

    A

    09/30/05

    $69.9 thousand Marine

    A

    03/31/05

    $210 thousand NIST(3)(6)

    A

    06/30/05

    $150 thousand Harris(4)(7)

    A

    06/25/04

    $20070 thousand ARLMarine Corps

    A

    04/30/04

    03/31/05

    $4.6 million NIST15 thousand NCMS(5)(8)

    B

    09/

    06/30/0407

    __________________________________________________________________________________________

    (1)

    Dates represent expiration of contract, not date of final billing.

    (2)

    The DOE contract is a cost share contract. DOE funding for this contract was suspended during January 2006 and reinstated during May 2007. During 2007, the Company received notifications from the DOE of funding releases totaling $1.0 million and also received an extension of the termination date for the contract from July 31, 2007 to September 30, 2008.

    (3)

    The total contract value for this cost shared contract is $1.3 million consisting of four Phases: Phase I for $500,000 was from March 12, 2002 through September 30, 2003; Phase II for $200,000 was from October 28, 2003 through October 31, 2004; Phase III for $348,000 was from August 23, 2004 through August 31, 2005; and Phase IV for $202,000 which commenced on December 14, 2004 and expired on June 30, 2006. Phases I, II, and III have been completed, while. Phase IV expired before it was completed.

    (1)This is a subcontract with SAFT America Inc. (SAFT) under the U.S. Army CECOM.


    (2)Total contract value is $1.250 million consisting of four Phases: Phase I for $500 thousand was from 3/12/02 thru 9/30/03; Phase II for $200 thousand was from 10/28/03 with a completion date of 10/31/04; Phase III for $348 thousand was from 8/23/04 thru 8/31/05; and Phase IV for $202 thousand which commenced on 12/14/04 and expires on 6/30/06. Phases I and II have been

    F-11

    MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

    NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

     

    completed and the final report for Phase III has been accepted. Retainage will be billed upon acceptance of final report incorporating all completed phases of the contract.

    (3) This is a subcontract with CSMP under NIST and includes the original contract for $200 thousand and a contract amendment for $10 thousand.

    (4) This contract includes the original contract for $200 thousand, an amendment for $50 thousand and a 2005 amendment reducing the contract by $100 thousand.

    (5)This contract was a joint venture with DuPont. DuPont's share of the contract revenue was $1.3 million.

    (6) Dates represent expiration of contract, not date of final billing.

    Contract Type A - Fixed Price Contract.

    Contract Type B - Cost Shared Contract.

    (4)

    The Samsung contract is a research and prototype contract. This contract included one up-front payment of $750,000 and two milestone payments of $125,000 each for the delivery of prototypes. The contract was amended on October 22, 2007 as MTI Micro agreed to issue a credit in the amount of the last invoice in recognition of the Company’s continuing collaboration with Samsung. Therefore, revenue under this contract totaled $875,000.

    (5)

    The SAFT contract is a fixed price contract. This is a subcontract with SAFT under the U.S. Army CECOM contract. The purchase order received in connection with this subcontract was revised on November 14, 2006 eliminating one milestone. As a result, the contract value was reduced from $470,000 to $418,000 and the expiration date was extended from September 30, 2006 to December 31, 2006.

    (6)

    Represents a fixed price subcontract with CSMP under NIST and includes the original contract for $200,000 and a contract amendment for $10,000.

    (7)

    Represents a fixed price contract that includes the original contract for $200,000, an amendment for $50,000, and a 2005 amendment reducing the contract by $100,000.

    (8)

    This contract was a cost plus catalyst research contract with the National Center for Manufacturing Sciences (“NCMS”).

    The Company'sCompany’s cost-shared contracts require that the Company's subsidiary MTI MicroFuel Cells Inc. ("MTI Micro")Micro conduct research, and deliver direct methanol micro fuel cell ("DMFC") prototypes, and other deliverables pursuant to predefined work plans and schedules. TheFor cost-shared contracts with NIST, NYSERDA and the DOE result inspanning multiple years, the following table summarizes as of December 31, 2007 the total multi-year contract expenditures incurred or expected to be incurred by MTI Micro: $6,696,968, $2,702,080Micro along with the related funded research and $6,144,094, and aredevelopment revenue received or expected to or have resulted in total multi-year funding of $3,342,085, $1,249,736 and $1,175,000 respectively.be received:

    (Dollars in thousands)

     

    Total Contract Value

     

    Contract

     

    Funded Expense

     

    Funded Revenue

     

    DOE

     

    $

    6,144

     

    $

    3,000

     

    NYSERDA

     

     

    2,702

     

     

    1,250

     

    MTI Micro retains ownership of the intellectual property ("IP"(“IP”) generated by MTI Micro under each of its federal government contractscontract and under contractsthe contract with Harris and CSMP.Samsung. Each federal government agency retains a government use license and march-in rights if MTI Micro fails to commercialize technology generated under the contract. In addition, under the NYSERDANew York State Energy Research and Development Authority (“NYSERDA”) contract, MTI Micro has the right to elect to retain any invention made under the NYSERDA contract within six months of invention. NYSERDA also retains rights to a government use license for New York State and its political subdivisions for any inventions made under the contract. In addition,Additionally, MTI Micro agreed to pay NYSERDA a royalty of 1.5%5.0% of the sales price of any product sold incorporating IP developed pursuant to the NYSERDA contract ifcontract. If the product is manufactured by a New York State manufacturer. Thismanufacturer, this royalty increasesis reduced to 5% if the manufacturer is not deemed to be a New York State manufacturer. In any event, the royalty is1.5%. Total royalties are subject to a cap equal to two times the total contract funds paid by NYSERDA to MTI Micro, asand may potentially be reduced to reflect any New York State jobs created by MTI Micro.

    Cost of Product Revenue

    Cost of product revenue includes material, labor and overhead. Costs incurred in connection with funded research and development arrangements are included in funded research and product development expenses.

    Deferred Revenue

    Deferred revenue consists of payments received from customers in advance of services performed, products shipped,completed installation completion or customer acceptance.

    Warranty

    The Company records a warranty reserve at the time product revenue is recorded based on a historical rate. The reserve is reviewed during the year and is adjusted, if appropriate, to reflect new product offerings or changes in experience. Actual warranty claims are tracked by product line.

    Accounting for Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

    Intangible assets include patents and trade names. Goodwill and other intangible assets are accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 142,Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. Intangible assets with finite useful lives are amortized over those periods. Indefinite livedlife intangible assets will beare tested for impairment annually, and will be tested for impairment between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would indicate that the carrying amount may be impaired. Definite livedlife assets are tested for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that a carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. An impairment loss would be recognized when the carrying amount of an asset exceeds the estimated undiscounted cash flows used in determining the fair value of the asset. The amount of the impairment loss to be recorded is calculated by the excess of the assets carrying value over its fair value. Fair value is generally determined using a discounted cash flow analysi s.analysis. Costs related to internally-developed intangible assets are expensed as incurred.

    F-12


    MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

    NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

    Accounting for Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets

    The Company accounts for impairment or disposal of long-lived assets in accordance with SFAS No. 144,Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. This Statement addresses financial accounting and reporting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets and specifies how impairment will be measured and how impaired assets will be classified in the consolidated financial statements. On a quarterly basis, the Company analyzes the status of its long-lived assets at each subsidiary for potential impairment. As of December 31, 2007, the Company does not believe that any of its long-lived assets have suffered any type of impairment that would require an adjustment to that asset’s recorded value.

    Cash and Cash Equivalents

    Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash and highly liquid short-term investments with original maturities of less than three months.

    Securities Available for Sale

    Management determines the appropriate classification of its investments in marketable securities at the time of purchase and reevaluates such determinations at each balance sheet date. Marketable securities for which the Company does not have the intent or ability to hold to maturity are classified as available for sale. Securities available for sale are carried at fair value, with the unrealized gains and losses, net of income taxes, reported as a separate component of shareholders'stockholders’ equity. The Company has had no investments that qualify as trading or held to maturity. Realized gains and losses are included in "Gainthe caption “Gain (loss) on sale of securities available for sale"sale” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The cost of securities sold is based on the specific identification method.

    Net (Loss) Income per Basic and Diluted Common Share

    The Company reports net (loss) income per basic and diluted common share in accordance with SFAS No. 128,Earnings Per Share, which establishes standards for computing and presenting (loss) income per share. Basic earnings (loss) income per common share isare computed by dividing net (loss) income attributable to common shareholders by the weighted-averageweighted average number of common shares outstanding forduring the reporting period. Diluted (loss) income per share reflects the potential dilution, if any, which would occur if securities or other contracts to issuecomputed by dividing net (loss) income by the combination of dilutive common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted inshare equivalents, comprised of shares issuable under outstanding investment rights, warrants and the issuanceCompany’s share-based compensation plans, and the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the reporting period. Dilutive common share equivalents include the dilutive effect of in-the-money stock that then shared inoptions, which are calculated based on the (loss) incomeaverage share price for each period using the treasury stock method. Under the treasury stock method, the exercise price of a stock option, the Company.

    Stock Based Compensation

    At December 31, 2005,amount of compensation cost, if any, for future service that the Company has two stock-basednot yet recognized, and the amount of windfall tax benefits that would be recorded in additional paid-in capital, if any, when the stock option is exercised are assumed to be used to repurchase shares in the current period.

    Share-Based Payments

    The Company has three share-based employee compensation plans and its majority-owned subsidiary, MTI Micro has one stock-basedshare-based employee compensation plan, all of which are described more fully in Note 13, Stock Based Compensation.

    In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) revised SFAS No. 123 (“FAS 123R”),Share-Based Payment, which establishes accounting for share-based awards exchanged for employee services and requires companies to expense the estimated fair value of these awards over the requisite employee service period. The accounting provisions of FAS 123R were adopted by the Company as of January 1, 2006. In March 2005, the SEC issued SAB 107,Share-Based Payment(“SAB 107”) to assist filers by simplifying some of the implementation challenges of FAS 123R. In particular, SAB 107 provides supplemental implementation guidance on FAS 123R, including guidance on valuation methods, classification of compensation expense, inventory capitalization of share-based compensation cost, income tax effects, disclosures in Management’s Discussion and Analysis and several other issues. The Company applied the principles of SAB 107 in conjunction with its adoption of FAS 123R.

    Under FAS 123R, share-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date, based on the estimated fair value of the award, and is recognized as expense over the employee’s requisite service period. The Company has awards with performance conditions, but no awards with market conditions. The Company adopted the provisions of FAS 123R on January 1, 2006, the first day of the Company’s fiscal year, using the modified prospective application, which provided for certain changes to the method for valuing share-based compensation. Under the modified prospective application, prior periods were not revised for comparative purposes. The valuation provisions of FAS 123R apply to new awards and to awards that are outstanding on the effective date and subsequently modified or cancelled. Estimated compensation expense for awards outstanding at the effective date will be recognized over the remaining service period using the compensation cost calculated for pro forma disclosure purposes under the original FASB Statement No. 123,Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation(“FAS 123”).


    MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

    NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

    In November 2005, the FASB issued Staff Position No. FAS 123(R)-3,Transition Election Related to Accounting for Tax Effects of Share-Based Payment Awards. The Company elected to adopt the alternative transition method provided in this FASB Staff Position for calculating the tax effects of share-based compensation pursuant to FAS 123R. This method included a simplified method to establish the beginning balance of the additional paid-in capital pool related to the tax effects of employee share-based compensation, which is available to absorb tax deficiencies recognized subsequent to the adoption of FAS 123R.

    Prior to the adoption of FAS 123R, the Company accounted for stock-based awards to employees and directors using the intrinsic value method in accordance with Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25,Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, requiresand related Interpretations as permitted under FAS 123. Under the measurementintrinsic value method, stock-based compensation was typically only recognized by the Company due to modifications in option provisions, since the exercise price of the Company’s and MTI Micro’s common stock options granted to employees and directors generally equaled the fair market value of the underlying stock at the date of grant.

    Stock-based compensation represents the cost related to stock-based awards granted to employees and directors. The Company measures stock-based compensation cost at grant date based on the estimated fair value of the award, and recognizes the cost as expense on a straight-line basis (net of estimated forfeitures) over the option’s requisite service period. The Company estimates the fair value of stock optionsstock-based awards using a Black-Scholes valuation model. Stock-based compensation expense is recorded in “Selling, general and administrative expenses” and “Unfunded research and product development expenses” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations based on the employees’ respective functions.

    The Company records deferred tax assets for awards that potentially can result in deductions on the Company’s income tax returns based on the amount of compensation cost recognized and the Company’s statutory tax rate. Differences between the deferred tax assets recognized for financial reporting purposes and the actual tax deduction reported on the Company’s income tax return are recorded in Additional Paid-In Capital (if the tax deduction exceeds the deferred tax asset) or warrants granted to employees to be included in the Consolidated Statement of Operations or, alternatively, disclosed in(if the notesdeferred tax asset exceeds the tax deduction and no historical pool of windfall tax benefits exists). Since the adoption of FAS123R, no tax benefits have been recognized related to consolidated financial statements.share-based compensation since the Company has incurred net operating losses and has established a full valuation allowanced to offset all potential tax benefits associated with these deferred tax assets. The Company accounts for stock-based compensation of employees under the intrinsic value method of APB Opinion No. 25,Accounting for Stock Issuedcontinues to Employees, and related Interpretations and has elected the disclosure-only alternative under SFAS No. 123,Share-Based Paymentas amended by SFAS No. 148,Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation - Transition and Disclosure. The Company recordsrecord the fair market value of stock options and warrants granted to non-employees and non-directors in exchange for services in accordance with EITF Issue No. 96-18,Accounting for Equity Instruments That Are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services, in the Consolidated StatementStatements of Operations.

    The following table illustrates the effect on net loss and loss per share as if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS Statement No. 123,Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, to stock-based employee compensation for each of the years ended December 31:

    (Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

    2005

    2004

    2003

    Net loss, as reported

    $(15,094)

    $(4,191)

    $ (559)

    Add: Total stock-based employee compensation expense already

       

    recorded in financial statements, net of related tax effects

    1,003

    5

    44

    Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined

       

    under fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects

    (2,963)

    (3,116)

    (1,604)

    Pro forma net loss

    $(17,054)

    $(7,302)

    $(2,119)

    Loss per Share:

       

    Basic and diluted - as reported

    $ (.49)

    $ (.14)

    $ (.02)

    Basic and diluted - pro forma

    $ (.55)

    $ (.25)

    $ (.08)

    F-13

    MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

    NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

    Advertising

    The costs of advertising are expensed as incurred. Advertising expense was approximately $45, $41$110, and $25$102 thousand infor the years ended December 31, 2005, 20042006, and 2003,2007, respectively.

    Concentration of Credit Risk

    Financial instruments that subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk principally consist of cash equivalents, marketable securities, trade accounts receivable and unbilled contract costs.

    The Company'sCompany’s trade accounts receivable and unbilled contract costs and fees are primarily from sales to commercial customers, andthe U.S. government and state agencies. The Company does not require collateral and has not historically experienced significant credit losses related to receivables or unbilled contract costs and fees from individual customers or groups of customers in any particular industry or geographic area.

    The Company deposits its cash and invests in marketable securities primarily through commercial banks and investment companies. Credit exposure to any one entity is limited by Company policy.

    Research and Development Costs

    The Company expenses research and development costs as incurred.

    Comprehensive (Loss) Income

    Comprehensive (loss) income includes net (loss) income, as well as changes in shareholders'stockholders’ equity, other than those resulting from investments by shareholdersstockholders (i.e., issuance or repurchase of common shares and dividends).


    MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

    NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

    Effect of Recent Accounting Pronouncements

    In November 2004,December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151,141R,Inventory Costs-an amendmentBusiness Combinations—a replacement of ARBFASB Statement No. 43, Chapter 4141("FAS 151"“SFAS No. 141R”), which issignificantly changes the resultprinciples and requirements for how the acquirer of a business recognizes and measures in its effortsfinancial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree. The statement also provides guidance for recognizing and measuring the goodwill acquired in the business combination and determines what information to converge U.S. accounting standards for inventories with International Accounting Standards.disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. SFAS No. 151 requires idle facility expenses, freight, handling costs and wasted material (spoilage) costs141R is effective prospectively, except for certain retrospective adjustments to be recognized as current-period charges. It also requires that allocation of fixed production overheads to the costs of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. SFAS No. 151deferred tax balances, for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. This statement will be effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company does not believe that the impact of this standard will have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

    In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (Revised 2004)Share-Based Payment ("SFAS No. 123R"), which is a revision of FASB SFAS No. 123,Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. SFAS No. 123R addresses all forms of share-based payment ("SBP") awards, including shares issued under employee stock purchase plans, stock options, restricted stock and stock appreciation rights. In March 2005 the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 (SAB 107). SAB 107 expresses views of the SEC staff regarding the interaction between SFAS 123R and certain SEC rules. SFAS 123R focuses primarily on accounting for transactions in which an entity obtains employee services in share-based payment transactions. SFAS 123R requires public entities to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award. The grant-date fair value of employee share options and similar instruments will be estima ted using option-pricing models adjusted for the unique characteristics of those instruments. That cost will be recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award. In April 2005, the SEC delayed the implementation of SFAS 123R for public companies until the first annual period beginning after June 15, 2005. SFAS 123R is required to be adopted by the Company as of January 1, 2006.for fiscal year 2009. The Company has not yet determined the impact, of applying the various provisions of SFAS No. 123R. The effects of adopting this standard will depend on our future stock option activity and the term of the options.

    The Company currently utilizes a closed form option-pricing model to measure the fair value of stock-based compensation for employees. SFAS 123R permits the useif any, of this model or other models such as a lattice model. The Company has determined that it will use the Black-Scholes model to measure the fair value of share-based grants to employees upon the adoption of SFAS 123R. The effect of expensing stock options in accordance with the original SFAS 123 is presented above. SFAS 123R also requires that the benefits associated with the tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost be reported as a financing cash flow, rather than as an operating cash flow as required under current literature. This presentation may reduce net operating cash flows and increase net financing cash flows in periods after the effective date. The amount of this excess tax deduction benefit was $0 thousandstatement on its Consolidated Financial Statements.

    F-14

    MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

    NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

    and $294 thousand in the twelve months ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The unvested value of share awards to be amortized into the operating statement is approximately $1.494 million as of December 31, 2005.

    In December 2004,2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, Exchanges160,Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements—an amendments of Non-monetary Assets, an amendment of APB OpinionARB No. 29. 51(“SFAS No. 153 addresses160”). SFAS No. 160 requires that accounting and reporting for minority interests will be recharacterized as noncontrolling interests and classified as a component of equity. SFAS No. 160 also establishes reporting requirements that provide sufficient disclosures that clearly identify and distinguish between the measurementinterests of exchangesthe parent and the interests of non-monetarythe noncontrolling owners. SFAS No. 160 applies to all entities that prepare consolidated financial statements, except not-for-profit organizations, but will affect only those entities that have an outstanding noncontrolling interest in one or more subsidiaries or that deconsolidate a subsidiary. This statement is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2008. This statement will be effective for the Company for its fiscal year beginning January 1, 2009. Based upon the December 31, 2007 balance sheet, the impact of adopting SFAS No. 160 would be to reclassify from $143 thousand minority interests in consolidated subsidiaries to stockholders’ equity as a separate component of stockholders’ equity.

    In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159,The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities(“SFAS No. 159”). SFAS No. 159 provides companies with an option to report selected financial assets and redefines the scope of transactions that should be measured basedfinancial liabilities at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected are reported in earnings at each subsequent reporting date. SFAS No. 159 is effective beginning January 1, 2008. The adoption of the assets exchanged.provisions of SFAS No. 153159 is effective for non-monetary asset exchanges in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company does not believe that the impact of this standard willexpected to have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

    In March 2005,September 2006, the FASB issued FASB InterpretationSFAS No. 47, Accounting157,Fair Value Measurements(“SFAS No. 157”). SFAS No. 157 establishes a common definition for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations, which is an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations. The interpretation requires a liability for the fair value of a conditional asset retirement obligationto be recognized if theapplied to United States generally accepted accounting principles guidance requiring use of fair value, of the liability can be reasonably estimated. The interpretationestablishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosure about such fair value measurements. This Statement is effective for fiscal years endingbeginning after DecemberNovember 15, 2005.2007. This statement will be effective for the Company for its fiscal year beginning January 1, 2008. The Company doesadoption of the provisions of SFAS No. 157 is not believe that the impact of this standard willexpected to have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

    In May 2005,September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154,158,Employers’ Accounting Changesfor Defined Benefit Pension and Error Corrections - replacementOther Postretirement Plans, an amendment of APB OpinionFASB Statements No. 2087, 88, 106, and FASB Statement No. 3, (SFAS No. 154) was issued. 132(R)(“SFAS No. 154 changes158”). Among other items, SFAS No. 158 requires recognition of the accounting for and reportingover-funded or under-funded status of a changean entity’s defined benefit postretirement plan as an asset or liability in accounting principle by requiring retrospective application to prior periods'the financial statements, requires the measurement of changesdefined benefit postretirement plan assets and obligations as of the end of the employer’s fiscal year, and requires recognition of the funded status of defined benefit postretirement plans in accounting principle unless impracticable. SFAS No. 154other comprehensive income. This Statement is effective for accounting changes made in fiscal years beginningending after December 15, 2005. The2006. Since the Company does not believe thatmaintain any defined benefit or other postretirement plans, the impactadoption of this standard willStatement for fiscal year 2007 did not have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

    In June 2005,March 2006, the FASB's Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF"FASB issued SFAS No. 156,Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets—an amendment of FASBStatement No. 140(“SFAS No. 156”) reached a consensusthat provides guidance on Issueaccounting for separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities. In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 05-6, Determining156, separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities must be initially measured at fair value, if practicable. Subsequent to initial recognition, the Amortization PeriodCompany may use either the amortization method or the fair value measurement method to account for Leasehold Improvements (EITF 05-6). The guidance requires that leasehold improvements acquired in a business combination or purchased subsequent toservicing assets and servicing liabilities within the inceptionscope of a lease be amortized over the lesser of the useful life of the assets or a term that includes renewals that are reasonably assured at the date of the business combination or purchase. The guidance is effective for periods beginning after June 29, 2005.this Statement. The adoption of EITF 05-6this Statement by the Company in fiscal year 2007 did not have a significantmaterial effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

    Retroactive Adjustments and Revision

    The financial statements for all prior periods have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the change in par value of the Company's common stock (See Note 11).

    The Company has revised its 2003Company’s Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities. The Company had previously reconciled net loss excluding discontinued operations to net cash used in operating activities.Financial Statements.

     

  5. In February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155,Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments—an amendment of FASBStatements No. 133 and 140(“SFAS No. 155”), to permit fair value remeasurement for any hybrid financial instrument that contains an embedded derivative that otherwise would require bifurcation in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 133,Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.The adoption of this Statement by the Company in fiscal year 2007 did not have a material effect on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.


    MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

    NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

    3.Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

  6. Receivables consist of the following at December 31:

    (Dollars in thousands)

    2005

    2004

     

    2006

     

    2007

     

    U.S. and State Government:

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Amount billable

    $ 98

    $301

     

    $

    194

     

    $

    0

     

    Amount billed

    373

    844

     

     

    9

     

     

    79

     

    Retainage

    35

    11

    Total U.S. and State Government

    $506

    $1,156

     

     

    203

     

     

    79

     

    Commercial:

    492

    674

    998

    1,830

    Allowance for bad debts

    -

    (58)

    Commercial

     

     

    1,410

     

     

    1,290

     

    Total

    $998

    $1,772

     

    $

    1,613

     

    $

    1,369

     

    F-15

    MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

    NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

    The balances billed butAs of December 31, 2006 and 2007, the Company concluded that a reserve for doubtful trade accounts receivable was not paid by customers pursuant to retainage provisions in contracts are due upon completion of the contracts and acceptance by the customer. Based on the Company's experience, most retainage amounts are expected to be collected within the ensuing year.considered necessary.

     

  7. Issuance of Stock by Subsidiary
  8. 4.

    Issuance of Stock by Subsidiary

    MTI Micro was formed on March 26, 2001 and as of December 31, 2005,2007; the Company owns approximately 90%96% of MTI Micro'sMicro’s outstanding common stock.

    On December 31, 2005, as a result of an option exchange between the MTICompany and MTI Micro, option exchange (see Note 11 - Shareholders' Equity), MTI Micro issued 105,701 shares of its common stock at a price of $2.22 per share to the Company as compensation for minority shareholderstockholder benefit in connection with the transaction. Additionally, on December 31, 2005, MTI Micro issued 1,103,604 shares of its common stock at a price of $2.22 per share to the Company in connection with the conversion of its $2.450 million$2,450 thousand loan receivable to equity.

    On April 7, 2004,December 31, 2006, MTI Micro sold 3,218,885 and 215,000issued 3,772,727 shares of MTI Micro common stock to the Company and a group of private investors, respectively, at a price of $4.66 per share for approximately $15 million and $1 million, respectively. Further, on May 20, 2004, MTI Micro sold 215,000 shares of MTI Micro common stock to a private investor at a price of $4.66 per share for approximately $1 million.

    On September 19, 2003, MTI Micro entered into a strategic alliance agreement with Gillette whereby Gillette purchased 1,088,278 shares (362,760 post 2004 1 for 3 reverse split) of MTI Microits common stock at a price of $.92 ($2.76 post 2004 1 for 3 reverse split)$1.10 per share for $1 million pursuant to an equity investment agreement (the "Investment Agreement"). In addition to the foregoing referenced $1 million investmentCompany in MTI Micro common stock, Gillette may make additional investments of up to $4 million subject to agreed milestones. The Company agreed to invest $20 million in MTI Micro before September 19, 2005 if other sources of funding are not available. Immediately prior to the Gillette transaction closing, the Company invested $11 million ($7.4 million in cash and $3.6 million throughconnection with the conversion of aits $4,150 thousand loan receivable to equity)equity; on December 1, 2006, MTI Micro issued 739 shares of its $20 million commitment in MTI Micro common stock.

    As a result of the Company's 2004 investment in MTI Micro common stock, it has fully satisfied its remaining investment guaranty under The Gillette Company ("Gillette") agreement.

    In connection with the 2003 Gillette transaction, MTI Micro converted its Junior Convertible Preferred Class A and Senior Convertible Preferred Class B stock into common stock and treasury stock of $15 thousand was retired.

    On October 29, 2003, Jeong Kim, a member of the board of directors of MTI Micro, purchased 1,088,278 (362,760 post 2004 1 for 3 reverse split) shares of MTI Micro common stock at a price of $.92 ($2.76 post 2004 1 for 3 reverse split)$1.61 per share to the Company as compensation for $1 million.the minority stockholder benefit in connection with the Company issuing Company options to MTI Micro employees; on November 11, 2006, MTI Micro issued 1,960,506 shares of its common stock at a price of $1.06 per share to the Company in connection with the transfer of $2,070 thousand worth of Plug Power common stock to MTI Micro; on September 30, 2006, MTI Micro issued 2,574,627 shares of its common stock at a price of $1.34 per share to the Company in connection with the conversion of its $3,450 thousand loan receivable to equity; on September 1, 2006, MTI Micro issued 56,055 shares of its common stock at a price of $3.10 per share to the Company as compensation for the minority stockholder benefit in connection with the Company issuing Company options to MTI Micro employees; on May 27, 2006, MTI Micro issued 50,158 shares of its common stock at a price of $2.32 to the Company as compensation for the minority stockholder benefit in connection with the Company issuing Company options to MTI Micro employees; between April 11 and April 18, 2006, MTI Micro issued 1,662,400 shares of its common stock at a price of $2.50 per share to the Company in connection with the transfer of $4,156 thousand worth of Plug Power common stock to MTI Micro; and on March 31, 2006, MTI Micro issued 1,400,000 shares of its common stock at a price of $2.50 per share to the Company in connection with the conversion of its $3,500 thousand loan receivable to equity.

    Between October 10 and October 25, 2007, MTI Micro issued 4,050,488 shares of its common stock at a price between $0.37 and $0.41 per share to the Company in connection with the transfer of $2,808 thousand worth of Plug Power common stock to MTI Micro; on November 16, 2007, MTI Micro issued 1,630,339 shares of its common stock at a price of $0.33 per share to the Company in connection with the transfer of $1,113 thousand worth of Plug Power common stock to MTI Micro; on September 1, 2007, MTI Micro issued 35,625 shares of its common stock at a price of $0.62 per share to the Company as compensation for the minority stockholder benefit in connection with the Company issuing Company options to MTI Micro employees; on September 30, 2007, MTI Micro issued 2,740,715 shares of its common stock at a price of $0.69 per share to the Company in connection with the conversion of its $1,900 thousand loan receivable to equity; on June 1, 2007, MTI Micro issued 8,653 shares of its common stock at a price of $0.94 per share to the Company as compensation for the minority stockholder benefit in connection with the Company issuing Company options to MTI Micro employees; on June 30, 2007, MTI Micro issued 6,083,334 shares of its common stock at a price of $0.60 per share to the Company in connection with the conversion of its $3,650 thousand loan receivable to equity; on March 1, 2007, MTI Micro issued 682 shares of its common stock at a price of $0.98 per share to the Company as compensation for the minority stockholder benefit in connection with the Company issuing Company options to MTI Micro employees; and on March 31, 2007, MTI Micro issued 4,243,721 shares of its common stock at a price of $0.84 per share to the Company in connection with the conversion of its $3,550 thousand loan receivable to equity.

    The (decrease) increasedecrease in the Company'sCompany’s paid-in-capital of $(99), $351$301, $1,284, and $881$521 thousand in 2005, 20042006, and 2003,2007, respectively, represents the changes in the Company'sCompany’s equity investment in MTI Micro, which resulted from the (anti-dilutive)/dilutiveanti-dilutive impact of the Company'sCompany’s investments


    MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

    NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

    into and third-party stock transactions in MTI Micro stock.

     

    5.

    Inventories

  9. Inventories
  10. Inventories, net consist of the following at December 31:

    (Dollars in thousands)

    2005

    2004

    Finished goods

    $ 351

    $ 318

    Work in process

    92

    100

    Raw materials, components and assemblies

    615

    718

     

    $1,058

    $1,136

    (Dollars in thousands)

     

    2006

     

    2007

     

    Finished goods

     

    $

    279

     

    $

    467

     

    Work in process

     

     

    238

     

     

    168

     

    Raw materials, net

     

     

    699

     

     

    738

     

     

     

    $

    1,216

     

    $

    1,373

     

     

    6.

    Property, Plant and Equipment

     

    F-16

    MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

    NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

  11. Property, Plant and Equipment
  12. Property, plant and equipment consist of the following at December 31:

    (Dollars in thousands)

     

    2006

     

    2007

     

    Leasehold improvements

     

    $

    1,213

     

    $

    1,213

     

    Computers and related software

     

     

    2,186

     

     

    2,241

     

    Machinery and equipment

     

     

    3,625

     

     

    3,895

     

    Office furniture and fixtures

     

     

    303

     

     

    303

     

     

     

     

    7,327

     

     

    7,652

     

    Less accumulated depreciation

     

     

    4,401

     

     

    5,493

     

     

     

    $

    2,926

     

    $

    2,159

     

    (Dollars in thousands)

    2005

    2004

    Leasehold improvements

    $ 1,191

    $ 1,162

    Machinery and equipment

    4,747

    4,087

    Office furniture and fixtures

    281

    273

     

    6,219

    5,522

    Less accumulated depreciation

    3,724

    2,638

     

    $2,495

    $2,884

    Depreciation expense was $1,253, $911$1,101, and $599$1,129 thousand for 2005, 20042006, and 2003,2007, respectively. Repairs and maintenance expense was $105, $111$75, and $83$82 thousand for 2005, 20042006, and 2003,2007, respectively.

     

  13. Securities Available for Sale
  14. 7.

    Securities Available for Sale

    Securities available for sale are classified as both current assets and long-term restricted assets and accumulated net unrealized gains (losses) are charged to other comprehensive income (loss).

    The principal components of the Company'sCompany’s securities available for sale consist of the following at:

    (Dollars in thousands, except stock price and share data)

    Security

     

    Book Basis

     

    Unrealized Gain

     

    Recorded Fair Value

     

    Quoted Market Price

    Per NASDAQ

     

    Ownership

     

    Shares

     

    December 31, 2006

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Plug Power

     

    $

    4,602

     

    $

    5,473

     

    $

    10,075

     

    $

    3.89

     

    2.99

    %

    2,589,936

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    December 31, 2007

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Plug Power

     

    $

    2,021

     

    $

    2,471

     

    $

    4,492

     

    $

    3.95

     

    1.29

    %

    1,137,166

     

    (Dollars in thousands, except stock price and share data)

        

    Quoted

      
        

    Market

      
     

    Book

    Unrealized

    Recorded

    Price

      

    Security

    Basis

    Gain

    Fair Value

    Per NASDAQ

    Ownership

    Shares

    December 31, 2005

          

    Plug Power

    $ 6,562

    $12,385

    $18,947

    $ 5.13

    4.31%

    3,693,436

    December 31, 2004

    Plug Power:

          

    Current

    $ 5,141

    $12,537

    $17,678

    $6.11

    3.95%

    2,893,227

    Restricted(1)

    4,797

    11,700

    16,497

    $6.11

    3.69%

    2,700,000

     

    $ 9,938

    $24,237

    $34,175

     

    7.64%

    5,593,227

    (1)In connection with the amended private placement agreement, the Company had deposited 2.7 million shares of Plug Power common stock into escrow. The shares were released from escrow on June 30, 2005.

    The book basis roll forward of Plug Power securities as of December 31 is as follows:

    Plug Power - Current

    (Dollars in thousands)

    2005

    2004

    Securities available for sale, beginning of period

    $ 5,141

    $10,791

    Sale of shares

    (178)

    (853)

    Transfer 900,209 shares from restricted on 6/30/05

    1,599

    -

    Transfer 3,000,000 shares to restricted on 1/29/04

    -

    (5,330)

    Transfer 300,000 shares from restricted on 5/6/04

    -

    533

    Securities book basis

    6,562

    5,141

    Unrealized gain on securities available for sale

    12,385

    12,537

    Securities available for sale, end of period

    $18,947

    $17,678


     

     

    F-17

    MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

    NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

    Plug Power - Restricted

    (Dollars in thousands)

    2005

    2004

    Securities available for sale, beginning of period

    $ 4,797

    $ -

    Sale of shares

    (3,198)

    -

    Transfer 900,209 shares to current on 6/30/05

    (1,599)

    -

    Transfer 3,000,000 shares from current on 1/29/04

    -

    5,330

    Transfer 300,000 shares to current on 5/6/04

    -

    (533)

    Securities book basis

    -

    4,797

    Unrealized gain on securities available for sale

    -

    11,700

    Securities available for sale - restricted, end of period

    $ -

    $16,497

    Accumulated unrealized gains related to securities available for sale for each of the years ended December 31 are as follows:

    (Dollars in thousands)

    2005

    2004

    Accumulated unrealized gains

    $ 12,385

    $24,237

    Accumulated deferred tax expense on unrealized gains

    (6,402)

    (9,695)

    Accumulated net unrealized gains

    $ 5,983

    $14,542

    The book basis roll forward of Plug Power securities as of December 31 is as follows:

     

    (Dollars in thousands)

     

    2006

     

    2007

     

     

     

     

    Securities available for sale, beginning of period

     

    $

    6,562

     

    $

    10,075

     

     

     

     

     

    Sale of shares

     

     

    (1,960

    )

     

    (8,054

    )

     

     

     

     

    Securities book basis

     

     

    4,602

     

     

    2,021

     

     

     

     

     

    Unrealized gain on securities available for sale

     

     

    5,473

     

     

    2,471

     

     

     

     

     

    Securities available for sale, end of period

     

    $

    10,075

     

    $

    4,492

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Accumulated unrealized gains related to securities available for sale for each of the years ended December 31 are as follows:

     

    (Dollars in thousands)

     

    2006

     

    2007

     

     

     

     

     

    Accumulated unrealized gains

     

    $

    5,473

     

    $

    2,471

     

     

     

     

     

    Accumulated deferred tax expense on unrealized gains

     

     

    (4,489

    )

     

    (1,971

    )

     

     

     

     

    Accumulated net unrealized gains

     

    $

    984

     

    $

    500

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Realized gains related to Plug Power securities available for sale sold during each of the years ended December 31 are as follows:

    (Dollars in thousands, except shares)

     

    2006

     

    2007

     

     

     

     

     

    Shares sold

     

     

    1,103,500

     

     

    1,452,770

     

     

     

     

     

    Proceeds

     

    $

    6,249

     

    $

    5,130

     

     

     

     

     

    Total net gain on sales

     

    $

    4,289

     

    $

    2,549

     

     

     

     

     

     

  15. Impairment Losses
  16. The Company regularly reviews its securities available for sale to determine if any declines in value of those securities available for sale are other than temporary. The Company assesses whether declines in the value of its securities in publicly traded companies, measured by comparison of the current market price of the securities to the carrying value of the Company'sCompany’s securities, are considered to be other than temporary based on factors that include (1) the length of time carrying value exceeds fair market value, (2) the Company'sCompany’s assessment of the financial condition and the near term prospects of the companies and (3) the Company'sCompany’s intent with respect to the securities.

    The sluggish economy prior to and during 2004 had a negative impact on the equity value of companies in the new energy sector, including our investment in SatCon, and based on the results of the reviews described above it was determined that the value of this publicly traded investment had declined for at least two consecutive quarters and there was no indication of an immediate recovery. As a result, a determination was made that the decline in value was likely to continue and it was appropriate to record adjustments for other than temporary declines in its value based on the then public market values. The Company recorded other than temporary impairment charges with respect to its securities available for sale in publicly traded companies. Pre-tax impairment losses are recorded in the Statement of Operations line titled Impairment losses. Impairment losses are as follows for the years ended December 31:

    (Dollars in thousands)8.

    2005

    2004

    2003

    Securities available for sale (SatCon)

    $ -

    $ -

    $ (418)Income Taxes

     

  17. Income Taxes
  18. Income tax (expense) benefit for each of the years ended December 31 consists of the following:

    (Dollars in thousands)

     

    2005

     

    2006

     

    2007

     

    Operations before minority interest

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Federal

     

    $

     

    $

     

    $

     

    State

     

     

    54

     

     

    (5

    )

     

    (30

    )

    Deferred

     

     

    (1,641

    )

     

    (1,890

    )

     

    (2,518

    )

    Total

     

    $

    (1,587

    )

    $

    (1,895

    )

    $

    (2,548

    )

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Income tax benefit (expense) allocated directly to stockholders’ equity for each of the years ended December 31 is as follows:

    (Dollars in thousands)

     

    2005

     

    2006

     

    2007

     

    Change in unrealized (gain) loss on securities available for sale:

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Deferred tax benefit (expense)

     

    $

    1,448

     

    $

    1,285

     

    $

    (27

    )

    Valuation allowance (expense)

     

     

    (1,448

    )

     

    (1,285

    )

     

    27

     

    Tax effect of reclassification adjustment for gains        included in net income (loss)

     

     

    3,293

     

     

    1,913

     

     

    2,518

     

    Expenses for employee stock options recognized differently for financial reporting/tax purposes:

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Federal tax benefit

     

     

    87

     

     

     

     

     

    Valuation allowance (expense)

     

     

    (87

    )

     

     

     

     

     

     

    $

    3,293

     

    $

    1,913

     

    $

    2,518

     

    Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the temporary differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities as measured by the enacted tax rates.


    MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

    NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

     

     

     

     

     

    The significant components of deferred income tax (expense) benefit from operations before minority interest for each of the years ended December 31 consists of the following:

    (Dollars in thousands)

     

    2005

     

    2006

     

    2007

     

    Deferred tax benefit (expense)

     

    $

    238

     

    $

    1,158

     

    $

    1,181

     

    Net operating loss carry forward

     

     

    5,673

     

     

    3,983

     

     

    3,069

     

    Valuation allowance

     

     

    (4,259

    )

     

    (5,118

    )

     

    (4,250

    )

    Disproportionate tax effect of reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income (loss)

     

     

    (3,293

    )

     

    (1,913

    )

     

    (2,518

    )

     

     

    $

    (1,641

    )

    $

    (1,890

    )

    $

    (2,518

    )

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    The Company’s effective income tax rate from operations before minority interest differed from the Federal statutory rate for each of the years ended December 31 is as follows:

     

     

    2005

     

    2006

     

    2007

     

    Federal statutory tax rate

     

     

    34

    %

     

    34

    %

     

    34

    %

    State taxes, net of federal tax effect

     

     

    3

     

     

    3

     

     

    1

     

    Change in valuation allowance

     

     

    (29

    )

     

    (37

    )

     

    (56

    )

    Disproportionate tax effect of reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income (loss)

     

     

    (19

    )

     

    (13

    )

     

    (28

    )

    Permanent tax difference on derivative valuation

     

     

     

     

     

     

    16

     

    Other, net

     

     

     

     

    (2

    )

     

     

    Tax Rate

     

     

    (11

    )%

     

    (15

    )%

     

    (33

    )%

     

    F-18

    MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

    NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

    Income tax (expense) benefit for each of the years ended December 31 consists of the following:

    (Dollars in thousands)

    2005

    2004

    2003

    Continuing operations before minority interest

       

    Federal

    $ -

    $ 96

    $ -

    State

    54

    (95)

    (2)

    Deferred

    (1,641)

    3,563

    671

    Total continuing operations

    (1,587)

    3,564

    669

    Discontinued operations

       

    Deferred

    -

    -

    (8)

    Total discontinued operations

    -

    -

    (8)

    Total

    $ (1,587)

    $ 3,564

    $ 661

    Income tax benefit (expense) allocated directly to shareholders' equity for each of the years ended December 31 is as follows:

        

    (Dollars in thousands)

    2005

    2004

    2003

    Derivative tax asset - Deferred

    $ -

    $ 696

    $ -

    Change in unrealized (gain) loss on securities available for sale:

       

    Deferred tax benefit (expense)

    1,448

    2,550

    (6,705)

    Valuation allowance (expense)

    (1,448)

    -

    -

    Tax effect of reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income (loss)

    3,293

    1,051

    2,189

        

    Expenses for employee stock options recognized differently for

       

    financial reporting/tax purposes:

       

    Federal tax benefit

    87

    294

    223

    Valuation allowance (expense)

    (87)

    -

    -

     

    $3,293

    $4,591

    $(4,293)

    The significant components of deferred income tax (expense) benefit for each of the years ended December 31 consists of the following:

    (Dollars in thousands)

    2005

    2004

    2003

    Continuing operations

       

    Deferred tax benefit (expense)

    $ 238

    $ (570)

    $(1,324)

    Net operating loss carry forward

    5,673

    4,133

    1,995

    Valuation allowance

    (4,259)

    -

    -

    Disproportionate tax effect of reclassification adjustment for gains included
    in net income (loss)

    (3,293)

    -

    -

     

    (1,641)

    3,563

    671

    Discontinued operations

    Deferred tax expense

    -

    -

    (8)

     

    $ (1,641)

    $ 3,563

    $ 663

    F-19

    MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

    NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

    The Company's effective income tax rate from continuing operations differed from the Federal statutory rate for each of the years ended December 31 is as follows:

    2005

    2004

    2003

    Federal statutory tax rate

    34%

    34%

    34%

    State taxes, net of federal tax effect

    6

    5

    6

    Change in valuation allowance

    (29)

    -

    -

    Disproportionate tax effect of reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income (loss)

    (22)

    -

    -

    Other (expense) income, net

    -

    -

    (1)

     

    (11)%

    39%

    39%

    Pre-tax loss from continuing operations before minority interests was $14,949, $9,121$12,980, and $1,731$7,609 thousand for 2005, 20042006, and 2003,2007, respectively.

    The deferred tax assets and liabilities as of December 31 consist of the following tax effects relating to temporary differences and carry forwards:

    (Dollars in thousands)

    2005

    2004

     

    2006

     

    2007

     

    Current deferred tax (liabilities) assets:

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Bad debt reserve

    $ -

    $ 23

    Inventory valuation

    19

    27

     

    $

    60

     

    $

    73

     

    Inventory capitalization

    14

    13

     

     

    14

     

     

    13

     

    Securities available for sale

    (6,166)

    (5,964)

     

     

    (3,039

    )

     

    (1,362

    )

    Vacation pay

    180

    176

     

     

    161

     

     

    147

     

    Warranty and other sale obligations

    8

    15

     

     

    8

     

     

    29

     

    Stock options

    -

    Other reserves and accruals

    (23)

    224

     

     

    58

     

     

    56

     

    (5,968)

    (5,486)

     

     

    (2,738

    )

     

    (1,044

    )

    Valuation allowance

    (140)

    -

     

     

    (256

    )

     

    (300

    )

    Net current deferred tax liabilities

    $(6,108)

    $(5,486)

     

    $

    (2,994

    )

    $

    (1,344

    )

    Noncurrent deferred tax assets (liabilities):

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Net operating loss

    $ 15,678

    $9,918

     

    $

    19,661

     

    $

    21,037

     

    Property, plant and equipment

    (156)

    (166)

     

     

    (239

    )

     

    27

     

    Securities available for sale - restricted

    -

    (5,566)

    Stock options

    594

    259

     

     

    1,379

     

     

    1,800

     

    Derivatives

    -

    450

    Other

    239

     

     

    239

     

     

     

    Research and development tax credit

    459

     

     

    459

     

     

    459

     

    Alternative minimum tax credit

    54

     

     

    54

     

     

    54

     

    16,868

    5,647

     

     

    21,553

     

     

    23,377

     

    Valuation allowance

    (10,783)

    (1,836)

    Noncurrent net deferred tax assets

    $ 6,085

    $ 3,811

    Other credits

    $-

    $ (24)


    MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

    NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

    Valuation allowance

     

     

    (18,559

    )

     

    (22,033

    )

    Non-current net deferred tax assets

     

    $

    2,994

     

    $

    1,344

     


    MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

    NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

    The valuation allowance at December 31, 20052006 and 20042007 was $10,923$18,815 and $1,836$22,333 thousand, respectively. The increase of $9,087net change in the valuation allowance was $7,892 thousand during 2005 relates primarily to $5,760in 2006 and $3,518 thousand net operating losses incurred in 2005, and the $5,364 thousand decrease in deferred tax liabilities related to securities available for sale net of other changes in deferred items.2007. The 2005 valuation allowance at December 31, 2006 and 2007 reflects the estimate that it is more likely than not that the net deferred tax assets may not be realized. The 2004In addition to changes in valuation allowance reflectsof $4,250 thousand reflected in continuing operations, the estimate that it is more likely than not that certain net operating losses may be unavailable to offset future taxable income.valuation allowance was increased by $1,201 thousand reflected in stockholders’ equity and decreased by $1,933 thousand as a result of the adoption of FIN 48.

    F-20

    MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

    NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

    Included in the financial statement line "Income taxes payable" as of December 31, 2005 is $56 thousand representing the Company's best estimate of reserves for potential adjustments related to on-going state tax examinations.

    At December 31, 2005,2007, the Company has unused Federal net operating loss carry forwards of approximately $39,115$53,918 thousand. Of these carry forwards, $1,325 thousand represents windfall tax benefits from stock option transactions, the tax effect of which are not included in the Company’s net deferred tax assets. The Federal net operating loss carry forwards, if unused, will begin to expire in 2010. The useAs of $561 thousand of loss carry forwards is limited on an annual basis, pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code, due to certain changes in ownership and equity transactions, which occurred in 1997. For the year ended December 31, 2005,2007, the Company has approximately $459 thousand of research and development tax credit carry forwards, which begin to expire in 2018, and approximately $54 thousand of alternative minimum tax credit carry forwards, which have no expiration date. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the temporary differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities as measured by the enacted tax rates

     

  19. Accrued Liabilities
  20. The Company adopted the provisions of FIN 48 on January 1, 2007, the first day of its 2007 fiscal year. As a result of the implementation of FIN 48, the Company recorded a $106 thousand increase in the net liability for uncertain tax positions, which was recorded as an adjustment to the Company’s opening balance of retained earnings on January 1, 2007. Additionally, the same tax position that triggered the Company’s FIN 48 adoption charge caused the Company to reclassify $80 thousand from current income taxes payable to non-current liabilities for uncertain tax positions.

    A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits for 2007 is as follows:

    (Dollars in thousands)

     

     

    Balance as of January 1, 2007

     

    $

    2,024

    Additions for tax positions related to the current year

     

     

    Additions for tax positions of prior years

     

     

    20

    Reductions for tax positions of prior years

     

     

    Settlements

     

     

    Balance as of December 31, 2007

     

    $

    2,044

    In future periods, if $1,836 thousand of these unrecognized benefits become supportable, the Company may not recognize a change in its effective rate as long as it remains in a full valuation allowance position, $208 thousand of these unrecognized tax benefits would affect the Company’s effective tax rate if recognized. Included in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits at January 1, 2007 is $239 thousand related to tax positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts could significantly change during the next twelve months. This amount represents unrecognized tax benefits comprising potential recognition for tax purposes of losses in a partnership in which the Company held a minority stake. In accordance with the Company’s accounting policy, it recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as a component of tax expense. This policy did not change as a result of the adoption of FIN 48. As of January 1, 2007, accrued interest included in Uncertain Tax Position Liability totaled $34 thousand. During the year ended December 31, 2007, the Company recognized $15 thousand in potential interest expense on uncertain tax positions, and the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet as of that date includes total interest of $49 thousand associated with these positions.

    The Company files income tax returns, including returns for its subsidiaries, with federal and state jurisdictions. The Company is no longer subject to IRS examination for its federal returns for any periods prior to 2003, although carryforward attributes that were generated prior to 2004 may still be adjusted upon examination by the IRS if they either have been or will be used in a future period. The Company has an ongoing tax examination by New York State for the years 2002 through 2004. The Company does not believe that the net outcome of this examination will have a material impact on its financial statements.

    9.

    Accrued Liabilities

    Accrued liabilities consist of the following at December 31:

    (Dollars in thousands)

    2005

    2004

     

    2006

     

    2007

     

    Salaries, wages and related expenses

    $ 680

    $ 588

    $

    781

    $

    937

     

    Acquisition and disposition costs

    363

     

    363

     

    363

     

    Legal and professional fees

    148

    384

     

    311

     

    230

     

    Warranty and other sale obligations

    20

    38

     

    19

     

    72

     

    Commissions

    42

    33

     

    139

     

    95

     

    Litigation settlement

    -

    35

    Deferred revenue

    120

    479

    Accrued contract losses

    -

    557

    Cash overdraft

    -

    390

    Other

    299

    420

     

    857

     

    424

     

    $1,672

    $3,287

    $

    2,470

    $

    2,121

     

     

  21. Shareholders' Equity


MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

10.

Stockholders’ Equity

Common Shares

Changes in common shares are as follows for the years ended December 31:

2005

2004

2003

 

2005

 

2006

 

2007

 

Balance, beginning

38,650,949

35,776,510

35,648,135

 

38,650,949

 

38,965,937

 

46,084,678

 

Issuance of shares for stock option exercises

148,575

193,768

128,375

 

148,575

 

719,791

 

85,946

 

Issuance of shares for private placement sharesA

66,413

2,680,671

-

Issuance of shares for stock grant

50,000

-

Issuance of shares for restricted stock grant

50,000

-

Issuance of shares for private placement shares

 

66,413

 

 

 

Issuance of shares for restricted and unrestricted stock grants

 

100,000

 

76,080

 

55,000

 

Issuance of shares for capital raise

 

 

6,055,556

 

 

Issuance of shares for anti-dilution penalty

 

 

267,314

 

 

Forfeiture of restricted stock grants

 

 

 

(5,000

)

Balance, ending

38,965,937

38,650,949

35,776,510

 

38,965,937

 

46,084,678

 

46,220,624

 

AShares totaling 66,413 were issued on April 20, 2005 as a result of a registration penalty, seePrivate Placement below.

Treasury Stock

Changes in treasury stock are as follows for the years ended December 31:

2005

2004

2003

 

2005

 

2006

 

2007

 

Balance, beginning

8,040,736

8,035,974

8,020,250

 

8,040,736

 

8,040,736

 

8,040,736

 

Shares acquired for cash

-

4,762

15,724

Balance, ending

8,040,736

8,035,974

 

8,040,736

 

8,040,736

 

8,040,736

 

 

F-21Sale of Common Stock

MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Warrants Issued

Capital Raise:On February 5, 2004,December 15, 2006, the Company issuedentered into agreements with certain investors to Chicago Investment Group, L.L.C.sell 6,055,556 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 3,027,778 shares of common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $10,900 thousand. The common stock and warrants were sold in units, with each unit consisting of 100 shares of common stock and a warrant to purchase 28,37750 shares of the Company's common stock, at an exercise price of $10.572$2.27 per share. Each non-certificated unit was sold at a negotiated price of $180.00. The shares of common stock and warrants are immediately separable and were issued separately (see Warrants Issued below). The common stock, the warrants and shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants are registered with the SEC on the Company’s filed and effective registration statement.

In connection with the 2006 capital raise, in December 2006, the Company paid Rodman & Renshaw, LLC placement fees, recorded in equity against the proceeds of the capital raise, of $570 thousand.

Private Placement:The Company entered into a financing transaction with Fletcher on January 29, 2004 and amended the terms of such transaction on May 4, 2004. Fletcher purchased 2,680,671 shares of the Company’s common stock for $18,000 thousand pursuant to such financing transaction – 1,418,842 shares at $7.048 per share and 1,261,829 shares at $6.34 per share. In addition, Fletcher had the right to purchase an additional $20,000 thousand of the Company’s common stock, on one or more occasions, at a price of $6.023 (adjusted from $6.34) per share at any time prior to December 31, 2006. Fletcher had the right to receive Company shares without payment upon the occurrence of certain events, including but not limited to, failing to register for resale with the SEC shares purchased by Fletcher on the agreed upon time table, a restatement of the Company’s financial statements, change of control of the Company and issuance of securities at a price below Fletcher’s purchase price. The Company has filed registration statements covering all of the shares purchased by Fletcher.

The Company filed a registration statement on January 6, 2005 covering the resale of 1,261,829 shares of the Company’s common stock purchased by Fletcher on December 22, 2004. The Company failed to meet its contractual obligation with Fletcher to have such registration statement declared effective by March 22, 2005 and therefore under the terms of the Fletcher agreement the Company was required to issue additional shares of common stock to Fletcher and the exercise price for the Fletcher additional investment rights has been reduced to $6.023 per share. The estimated fair valueCompany was required to issue a number of this warrantshares of common stock that resulted in Fletcher having effectively made its December 2004 investment at the date issued was $1.39a price per share usingthat was lower than the actual price paid. The Company refers to this reduced exercise price as the “deemed exercise price.” More specifically, for each month during which the Company failed to satisfy the registration requirement, the deemed exercise price was reduced by $0.317 per share. As a Black Scholes Option-Pricing modelconsequence, on April 20, 2005 the Company issued 66,413 shares of common stock to Fletcher without any additional payment required by Fletcher, representing a deemed exercise price for Fletcher’s December 2004 investment of $6.023 per share.


MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

In addition, since the Company was required to file a registration statement covering the resale of any such additional shares issued to Fletcher, the Company amended the registration statement initially filed in January 2005 to include the additional 66,413 shares of common stock. That registration statement, covering the resale of 1,328,242 shares of common stock, was declared effective by the SEC on April 21, 2005.

Dilutive Issuances:If, after December 31, 2004 and assumptions similarending December 31, 2006, the Company issued any equity securities at a price below $7.048 as it relates to those usedthe initial $10,000 thousand investment and $6.34 as it relates to any additional investments which have been made, the exercise price for valuing the Company'sadditional investment rights would be adjusted to provide Fletcher “weighted average” anti-dilution protection and the Company would have to issue to Fletcher a number of additional shares such that all prior investments will have been effectively made at such adjusted exercise price.

On December 7, 2006, Fletcher agreed to lower the dilutive issuance provision by 25% of the original calculation for the remainder of the provision’s original term and in connection with the issuance of common stock options. The warrant couldin the Company’s December 2006 capital raise, the Company issued Fletcher 267,314 of its common shares. Through a release dated January 5, 2007, between the Company and Fletcher, the Company is not required to register these shares with the SEC since these shares may be exercised until February 5, 2005 and expired unexercised on February 5, 2006.sold by Fletcher pursuant to Rule 144(k) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

The Company does not presently have any outstanding agreements with Fletcher concerning additional investment rights or dilutive stock issuance.

Warrants Issued

On December 20, 2006, the Company issued to SatCon warrants to investors to purchase 108,000 and 192,0003,027,778 shares of the Company'sCompany’s common stock on October 21, 1999 and January 31 2000, respectively.at an exercise price of $2.27 per share. These warrants will be fair valued by the Company until expiration or exercise of the warrants. The warrants were immediatelybecame exercisable at $12.56 per share. The estimated fair value of these warrants at the dates issued were $4.94on June 20, 2007 and $16.38 per share, respectively, using a Black-Scholes Option-Pricing model and assumptions similar to those used for valuing the Company's stock options. The warrants to purchase the 108,000 shares expired unexercisedexpire on October 21, 2003 and the warrants to purchase the 192,000 shares expired unexercised on January 31, 2004.December 19, 2011.

 

Reservation of Shares

The Company has reserved common shares for future issuance as follows as of December 31, 2005:2007:

Stock options outstanding

5,041,2426,213,566

Stock options available for issuance

1,363,214

Additional Investment Rights as required by the 2004 private placement agreement

4,150,7561,265,733

Warrants outstanding

28,3773,027,778

Number of common shares reserved

10,583,58910,507,077

Change in Par Value

On June 28, 2005, shareholders of the Company approved an Amendment to the Company's Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, to reduce the par value of the Company's common stock from $1.00 to $.01 per share. The reduction in the par value of the Company's common stock was effected on the Company's balance sheet by a reduction in the common stock par value account and a corresponding increase in the additional paid-in capital account. The reduction in the par value does not change the number of authorized shares of the Company's common stock. All per share amounts have been adjusted to retroactively give effect to the change in par value.

Completion of Option Exchange with MTI Micro Option Holders

On December 30, 2005, the Company issued options to acquire 1,021,213 shares of MTI common stock, par value $0.01 per share, to certain employees, officers and directors of MTI and MTI MicroFuel Cells Inc.Micro who previously held MTI Micro options (the "Optionees"“Optionees”). The options have an exercise price per share of $2.80 (the closing price of the Company'sCompany’s common stock on December 30, 2005). The Company issued the options pursuant to a November 28, 2005 stock option exchange offer. MTI Micro options outstanding for a purchase of a total of 2,392,947 shares of MTI Micro common stock, par value $0.01 per share, were tendered by the Optionees and then cancelled by MTI Micro as a result of this exchange. Each option is exercisable for one share of MTI common stock. The exchange rate was one option for each two MTI Micro options, rounded down to the nearest whole option, or if an individual had an MTI Micro option balance in excess of 150,000 options, then at a rate of one option for each four MTI Micro options in excess of 150,000 options. The exchange was accounted for in accordance with EITF 00-23 Issue 1,Issues Related to the Accounting for Stock Compensation under APB Opinion No. 25 and FASB Interpretation No. 44and no compensation expense was recorded.

11.

Retirement Plan

The Company maintains a voluntary savings and retirement plan under Internal Revenue Code Section 401(k) covering substantially all employees. Employees must complete six months of service and have attained the age of twenty-one prior to becoming eligible for participation in the plan. The Company plan allows eligible employees to contribute a percentage of their compensation on a pre-tax basis and the Company matches employee contributions dollar for dollar up to a discretionary amount, currently 4%, of the employee’s salary, subject to annual tax deduction limitations. Company matching contributions vest at a rate of 25% annually for each year of service completed. Company matching contributions were $272, $269, and $283 thousand for 2005, 2006, and 2007, respectively. The Company may also make additional discretionary contributions in amounts as determined by management and the Board of Directors. There were no additional discretionary contributions by the Company for the years 2005, 2006, or 2007.


MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

12.Earnings per Share

The following table sets forth the reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted per share computations for continuing operations for the years ended December 31:

(Dollars in thousands, except shares)

 

2005

 

2006

 

2007

 

Numerator:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss

 

$

(15,094

)

$

(13,667

)

$

(9,575

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Denominator:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic EPS:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common shares outstanding, beginning of period

 

 

30,610,213

 

 

30,925,201

 

 

38,043,942

 

Weighted average common shares issued during the period

 

 

127,395

 

 

700,267

 

 

72,887

 

Weighted average restricted shares forfeited during the period

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2,877

)

Less Weighted average non-vested restricted stock

 

 

 

 

(3,123

)

 

(5,575

)

Denominator for basic earnings per common shares –

Weighted average common shares

 

 

30,737,608

 

 

31,622,345

 

 

38,108,377

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted EPS:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common shares outstanding, beginning of period

 

 

30,610,213

 

 

30,925,201

 

 

38,043,942

 

Weighted average common shares issued during the period

 

 

127,395

 

 

700,267

 

 

72,887

 

Weighted average restricted shares forfeited during the period

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2,877

)

Less Weighted average non-vested restricted stock due to anti-dilutive effect

 

 

 

 

(3,123

)

 

(5,575

)

Denominator for diluted earnings per common shares –

Weighted average common shares

 

 

30,737,608

 

 

31,622,345

 

 

38,108,377

 

Not included in the computation of earnings per share-assuming dilution for the year ended December 31, 2005 were options to purchase 5,041,242 shares of the Company’s common stock, additional investment rights to purchase approximately 3,320,604 shares of the Company’s common stock, warrants to purchase 28,377 shares of the Company’s common stock and options to purchase 78,461 shares of MTI Micro’s common stock. These potentially dilutive items were excluded because the Company incurred a loss for this period and their inclusion would be anti-dilutive. The additional investment rights expired on December 31, 2006.

Not included in the computation of earnings per share-assuming dilution for the year ended December 31, 2006 were options to purchase 5,509,194 shares of the Company’s common stock, 5,000 unvested restricted shares of the Company’s common stock and options to purchase 33,668 shares of MTI Micro’s common stock. These potentially dilutive items were excluded because the Company incurred a loss for this period and their inclusion would be anti-dilutive. The MTI options expire between January 4, 2007 and November 9, 2016, while the MTI Micro options expire between September 29, 2012 and September 18, 2015. The Company also has 3,027,778 warrants outstanding as of December 31, 2006; however, these were excluded in the computation earnings per share because they were not eligible to be exercised until June 20, 2007.

Not included in the computation of earnings per share-assuming dilution for the year ended December 31, 2007 were options to purchase 6,213,566 shares of the Company’s common stock, warrants to purchase 3,027,778 shares of the Company’s stock, 5,000 unvested restricted shares of the Company’s common stock and options to purchase 22,668 shares of MTI Micro’s common stock. These potentially dilutive items were excluded because the Company incurred a loss for this period and their inclusion would be anti-dilutive.

13.

Stock Based Compensation

MTI Option Plans

Stock-based incentive awards are provided to employees and directors under the terms of the Company’s 1996 Stock Incentive Plan (“1996 Plan”), 1999 Employee Stock Incentive Plan (“1999 Plan”) and 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (“2006 Plan”), the (collectively, the “Plans”). Awards under the Plans have generally included at-the-money options and restricted stock grants. MTI Micro also issued awards under the MTI MicroFuel Cells Inc. 2001 Employee, Director and Consultant Stock Option Plan (“2001 MTI Micro Plan”). During 2005, MTI Micro ceased making grants under the 2001 MTI Micro Plan and determined that it would make no new awards under this plan in the future.


MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The 1996 Plan was approved by stockholders during December 1996. The 1996 Plan provided an initial aggregate number of 500,000 shares of common stock to be awarded or issued. The number of shares available to be awarded under the 1996 Plan and awards outstanding were adjusted for stock splits and rights offerings. The number of shares which may be awarded under the 1996 Plan was 3,746,813 during 2005, 2006, and 2007. Under the 1996 Plan, the Board of Directors was authorized to issue stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, and other stock-based incentives to officers, employees and others.

The 1999 Plan was adopted by the Company’s Board of Directors and approved by stockholders on March 18, 1999. The 1999 Plan provides that an initial aggregate number of 1,000,000 shares of common stock may be awarded or issued. The number of shares which may be awarded under the 1999 Plan and awards outstanding have been adjusted for stock splits, and during 2005, 2006, and 2007, the total number of shares which may be awarded under the 1999 Plan was 4,500,000 shares. Under the 1999 Plan, the Board of Directors is authorized to issue stock-based awards to officers, employees and others.

The 2006 Plan was adopted by the Company’s Board of Directors on March 16, 2006 and approved by stockholders on May 18, 2006. The 2006 Plan provides that an initial aggregate number of 2,000,000 shares of common stock may be awarded or issued. The number of shares which may be awarded under the 2006 Plan and awards outstanding will be adjusted for stock splits and other similar events. Under the 2006 Plan, the Board of Directors is authorized to issue stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, and other stock-based incentives to officers, employees and others.

Stock-based compensation expense for the year ended December 31, 2007 was generated from stock options and restricted stock grants. Stock options are awards which allow holders to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock at a fixed price. Stock options issued to employees generally vest 25% per year beginning one year after grant. Options issued to non-employee members of the MTI Board of Directors generally vest upon grant. Certain options granted may be fully or partially exercisable immediately, may vest on other than a four year schedule or vest upon attainment of specific performance criteria. Restricted stock awards generally vest one year after the date of grant; however, certain awards may vest immediately or vest upon attainment of specific performance criteria. Option exercise prices are generally equivalent to the closing market value price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. Unexercised options generally terminate either seven or ten years after date of grant.

Share-Based Compensation Information under FAS 123 and APB 25

Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company had elected to follow APB Opinion No. 25,Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (“APB Opinion No. 25”)and related Interpretations in accounting for employee stock-based compensation and to provide the disclosures required under FAS 123. APB Opinion No. 25 requires no recognition of compensation expense for most of the stock-based compensation arrangements provided by the Company, namely, broad-based employee option grants where the exercise price is equal to market value at the date of grant. However, APB Opinion No. 25 requires recognition of compensation expense for variable award plans over the vesting periods of such plans, based upon the then-current market values of the underlying stock. In contrast, FAS 123 requires recognition of compensation expense for grants of stock, stock options, and other equity instruments, over the vesting periods of such grants, based on the estimated grant-date fair values of those grants. Under the intrinsic-value-based method, compensation cost is the excess, if any, of the market value of the stock at grant over the amount an employee must pay to acquire the stock.

During 2005, the Company awarded 50,000 shares each of common stock and restricted common stock which vested over a one-year period. Presented below is a summary of compensation expense related to the intrinsic value of performance-based, time-based and unrestricted awards, which is included in the summary of the Company’s compensation expense under all share-based awards, for the Plans which was recorded in the financial statement line “Selling, general and administrative expenses” for the year ended December 31:

(Dollars in thousands)

 

2005

Stock

 

$

124

Restricted stock

 

 

45

Stock options

 

 

633

Total stock-based compensation expense

 

$

802

The 2005 stock-based compensation expense included $438 thousand of stock-based compensation expense recorded as a result of accelerating the vesting and/or extending the time to exercise options after termination but not in excess of the original contractual life of the options. These changes were made in connection with employment, termination and change in status (employee to consultant) arrangements.

Pro Forma Information under FAS 123 for Periods Prior to Fiscal 2006

Prior to adopting the provisions of FAS 123R, the Company recorded estimated compensation expense for employee stock options based upon their intrinsic value on the date of grant pursuant to APB Opinion No. 25 and provided the required pro forma


MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

disclosures of FAS 123. Because the Company generally established the exercise price based on the fair market value of the Company’s stock at the date of grant, the stock options generally had no intrinsic value upon grant, and therefore compensation expense was recorded primarily for grant modifications prior to adopting FAS 123R. Each accounting period, the Company reported the potential dilutive impact of stock options in its diluted earnings per common share using the treasury-stock method. Out-of-the-money stock options (i.e., the average stock price during the period was below the strike price of the stock option) were not included in diluted earnings per common share as their effect was anti-dilutive.

For purposes of pro forma disclosures under FAS 123 for the year ended December 31, 2005, the estimated fair value of the stock options was assumed to be amortized to expense over the stock options’ vesting periods. The pro forma effects of recognizing estimated compensation expense under the fair value method on net (loss) and (loss) per common share for the year ended December 31 was as follows:

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

2005

 

Net loss, as reported

 

$

(15,094

)

Add: Total stock-based employee compensation expense already recorded in financial statements,

net of related tax effects

 

 

1,003

 

Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based

method for all awards, net of related tax effects

 

 

(2,963

)

Pro forma net loss

 

$

(17,054

)

Loss per Share:

 

 

 

 

Basic and diluted - as reported

 

$

(0.49

)

Basic and diluted - pro forma

 

$

(0.55

)

 

 

2005

 

Fair value of each option granted

 

$

2.85

 

Number of options granted

 

 

1,467,880

 

Fair value of all options granted

 

$

4,187,301

 

The fair value of options granted, which is amortized to expense over the option vesting period in determining the pro forma impact, is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions for each of the year ended December 31:

2005

Expected life of option

5

years

Risk-free interest rate

4.28

%

Expected volatility of the Company’s stock

77.3

%

Expected dividend yield on the Company’s stock

0

%

The weighted average grant-date fair value of stock awarded and vested for each of the year ended December 31 is as follows:

 

 

2005

 

Fair value of each share granted

 

$

2.49

 

Number of shares granted

 

 

50,000

 

Fair value of all shares granted

 

$

124,500

 

The weighted average grant-date fair value of restricted stock awarded for each of the year ended December 31 is as follows:

 

 

2005

 

Fair value of each restricted share granted

 

$

2.49

 

Number of restricted shares granted

 

 

50,000

 

Fair value of all restricted shares granted

 

$

124,500

 


MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Share-Based Compensation Information under FAS 123R

As discussed in Note 2 “Significant Accounting Policies,” effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the fair value recognition provisions for stock-based awards granted to employees using the modified prospective application method provided by FAS 123R. Stock-based compensation cost is measured at grant date, based on the fair value of the award, and is recognized as expense over the employee requisite service period.

The Company estimates the fair value of stock options using a Black-Scholes valuation model consistent with the provisions of FAS 123R and SAB 107. Key inputs and assumptions used to estimate the fair value of stock options include the grant price of the award, the expected option term, volatility of the Company’s stock, an appropriate risk-free rate, and the Company’s dividend yield. Estimates of fair value are not intended to predict actual future events or the value ultimately realized by employees who receive equity awards, and subsequent events are not indicative of the reasonableness of the original estimates of fair value made by the Company.

The fair value of each stock option grant was estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes Option Pricing model. The following table presents the weighted-average assumptions used for options granted:

 

 

2006

 

2007

Option term (years) A

 

 

4.26

 

 

3.61

 

Volatility B

 

 

73.14

%

 

72.76

%

Risk-free interest rate range C

 

 

4.60 - 5.29

%

 

3.23 - 5.04

%

Dividend yield D

 

 

0

%

 

0

%

Weighted-average fair value per option granted

 

$

2.51

 

$

0.77

 

A The option term is the number of years that the Company estimates, based upon historical experience and the full contractual term of the options outstanding, those options will be outstanding prior to exercise.

B The expected stock price volatility as of the grant date is based on the historical volatility of the Company’s common stock price over a period corresponding to the expected term of the option, adjusted for activity that is not expected to occur in the future.

C The risk-free interest rate is the implied yield on U.S. Treasury zero coupon issues with a remaining term equal to the expected term used as the assumption in the model.

D The dividend yield assumption is based on the Company’s history and expectation of future dividend payouts, which may be subject to substantial change in the future.

Share-based compensation expense recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations is based on awards ultimately expected to vest, therefore, awards are reduced for estimated forfeitures. FAS 123R requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates.

Stock-Based Compensation Expense – All Accounting Treatments

Total share-based compensation expense, related to all of the Company’s share-based awards, recognized for the years ended December 31, was comprised as follows:

(Dollars in thousands, except EPS)

 

2005

 

2006

 

2007

 

Unfunded research and product development

 

$

 

$

512

 

$

216

 

Selling, general and administrativeB

 

 

1,003

 

 

1,894

 

 

1,342

 

Share-based compensation expense before taxes

 

 

1,003

 

 

2,406

 

 

1,558

 

Related income tax benefits A

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Share-based compensation expense, net of taxes

 

$

1,003

 

$

2,406

 

$

1,558

 

Impact on basic and diluted EPS

 

 

 

 

$

(0.08

)

$

(0.04

)

AIncome tax effect is zero due to the Company maintaining a full valuation allowance.

BCompensation expense for the year ended December 31, 2005 was calculated under APB 25.

As of January 1, 2006, the adoption of FAS 123R resulted in the elimination of unearned compensation related to restricted stock (contra equity account) against additional paid-in capital totaling approximately $80 thousand. Total unrecognized compensation costs related to non-vested awards as of December 31, 2007 is $1,595 thousand and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average vesting period of approximately 1.31 years.


MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Presented below is a summary of the Company’s stock option plans’ activity for the years ended December 31:

 

 

2005

 

2006

 

2007

 

Shares under option, beginning

 

3,752,063

 

5,041,242

 

5,509,194

 

Granted

 

1,467,880

 

1,564,750

 

1,853,750

 

Exercised

 

(148,575

)

(719,791

)

(85,946

)

Canceled/Forfeited

 

(10,126

)

(175,099

)

(520,921

)

Expired

 

(20,000

)

(201,908

)

(542,511

)

Shares under option, ending

 

5,041,242

 

5,509,194

 

6,213,566

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Options exercisable

 

4,197,029

 

4,053,286

 

4,628,348

 

Remaining shares available for granting of options

 

1,363,214

 

2,096,159

 

1,265,733

 

The weighted average exercise price is as follows for each of the years ended December 31:

 

 

2005

 

2006

 

2007

 

Shares under option, beginning

 

$

4.06

 

$

3.76

 

$

4.04

 

Granted

 

$

2.85

 

$

4.04

 

$

1.37

 

Exercised

 

$

2.20

 

$

1.65

 

$

0.70

 

Canceled/Forfeited

 

$

4.26

 

$

4.29

 

$

3.55

 

Expired

 

$

6.17

 

$

5.30

 

$

5.13

 

Shares under option, ending

 

$

3.76

 

$

4.04

 

$

3.24

 

Options exercisable, ending

 

$

3.85

 

$

4.12

 

$

3.55

 

The following table summarizes information for options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2007:

Outstanding Options

Options Exercisable

Exercise Price Range

 

Number

 

Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life

 

Weighted Average Exercise Price

 

Number

 

Weighted Average Exercise Price

$

0.76

-

$

1.13

 

154,000

 

4.9

 

$

0.88

 

75,000

 

$

0.92

$

1.23

-

$

1.78

 

1,982,700

 

5.6

 

$

1.40

 

1,035,825

 

$

1.46

$

1.91

-

$

2.83

 

1,163,199

 

4.8

 

$

2.58

 

1,113,254

 

$

2.58

$

2.86

-

$

4.17

 

1,308,667

 

4.9

 

$

3.63

 

1,214,144

 

$

3.63

$

4.30

-

$

6.28

 

1,402,500

 

4.9

 

$

5.20

 

987,625

 

$

5.52

$

9.25

-

$

12.97

 

202,500

 

2.1

 

$

10.55

 

202,500

 

$

10.55

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,213,566

 

5.0

 

$

3.24

 

4,628,348

 

$

3.55

The aggregate intrinsic value (i.e. the difference between the closing stock price and the price to be paid by the option holder to exercise the option) is zero for both the Company’s outstanding and exercisable options as of December 31, 2007. The amounts are based on the Company’s closing stock price of $0.75 as of December 31, 2007.

The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006, and 2007 was $217, $1,307, and $44 thousand, respectively. The total cash received by the Company as a result of stock option exercises for the year ended December 31, 2007 was approximately $60 thousand. In connection with these exercises, there was no tax benefit or expense realized by the Company for the year ended December 31, 2007. The Company settles employee stock option exercises with newly issued shares of Company common stock.


MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The number and weighted average grant-date fair value of unvested restricted stock for the period ended December 31, 2007 is as follows:

 

 

Number

 

Weighted Average Grant-Date Fair Value

 

Unvested restricted stock, beginning

 

5,000

 

$

4.05

 

Granted

 

55,000

 

 

1.34

 

Forfeited

 

(5,000

)

 

4.05

 

Vested

 

(50,000

)

 

1.34

 

Unvested restricted stock, ending

 

5,000

 

$

1.34

 

The aggregate intrinsic value of restricted stock vested during the year ended December 31, 2007 was $67 thousand.

MTI Micro Option Plan

The 2001 MTI Micro Plan was approved by MTI Micro’s stockholders in 2001 and provided an initial aggregate number of 1,766,000 shares of MTI Micro common stock to be awarded. The number of shares which may be awarded under the 2001 MTI Micro Plan and awards outstanding have been adjusted for a 2004 reverse stock split, and during 2005, 2006, and 2007, the total number of shares which may be awarded under the 2001 MTI Micro Plan were 3,416,667 shares. Under the 2001 MTI Micro Plan, the MTI Micro Board of Directors was authorized to award stock options to officers, directors, employees and consultants. No further grants will be made under this plan.

Options issued to employees generally vest 25% per year beginning one year after grant. Option exercise prices were determined by MTI Micro’s Board of Directors. Unexercised options generally terminate ten years after date of grant. Up until January 1, 2006, MTI Micro followed APB Opinion No. 25 and related Interpretations, in accounting for employee stock-based compensation and to provide the disclosures required under SFAS No. 123. APB Opinion No. 25 requires no recognition of compensation expense for most of the stock-based compensation arrangements provided by MTI Micro, namely, broad-based employee stock purchase plans and option grants where the exercise price is equal to or not less than the market value at the date of grant. However, APB Opinion No. 25 requires recognition of compensation expense for variable award plans over the vesting periods of such plans, based upon the then-current market values of the underlying stock. As of January 1, 2006, MTI Micro is accounting for employee stock-based compensation under FAS 123R.

Presented below is a summary of compensation expense, which is included in the summary of the Company’s compensation expense under all share-based awards above, for the MTI Micro plan:

(Dollars in thousands)

 

2005

 

2006

 

2007

 

Stock options

 

$

201

 

$

25

 

$

12

 

Total stock-based compensation expense

 

$

201

 

$

25

 

$

12

 

Presented below is a summary of the 2001 MTI Micro stock option plans activity for the years ended December 31:

 

 

2005

 

2006

 

2007

 

Shares under option, beginning

 

 

2,876,881

 

 

78,461

 

 

33,668

 

Granted

 

 

358,000

 

 

 

 

 

Exercised

 

 

(10

)

 

 

 

 

Canceled/Forfeited

 

 

(3,156,410

)

 

(44,793

)

 

(11,000

)

Shares under option, ending

 

 

78,461

 

 

33,668

 

 

22,668

 

Options exercisable

 

 

35,752

 

 

17,003

 

 

18,626

 

Remaining shares available for granting of options

 

 

3,280,403

 

 

3,325,196

 

 

3,336,196

 

The weighted average exercise price for MTI Micro options is as follows for each of the years ended December 31:

 

 

2005

 

2006

 

2007

 

Shares under option, beginning

 

$

3.00

 

$

3.22

 

$

3.61

 

Granted

 

 

3.68

 

 

 

 

 

Exercised

 

 

2.55

 

 

 

 

 

Canceled/Forfeited

 

 

3.12

 

 

2.93

 

 

3.42

 

Shares under option, ending

 

 

3.22

 

 

3.61

 

 

3.70

 

Options exercisable, ending

 

 

2.93

 

 

3.57

 

 

3.63

 


MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The fair value of MTI Micro options granted in 2005, which is amortized to expense over the option vesting period in determining the pro forma impact, was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions for the year ended December 31:

2005

Expected life of option

5

years

Risk-free interest rate

4.28

%

Expected volatility of the MTI Micro’s stock

77.3

%

Expected dividend yield on MTI Micro’s stock

0

%

The weighted average fair value of MTI Micro options granted for the year ended December 31 is as follows:

 

 

2005

 

Fair value of each option granted

 

$

3.68

 

Fair value of all options granted

 

$

930,890

 

In accordance with SFAS No. 123, the weighted average fair value of stock options granted is required to be based on a theoretical statistical model using the preceding Black-Scholes Option Pricing model assumptions.

Outstanding Options

Options Exercisable

Exercise Price Range

 

Number

 

Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life

 

Weighted Average Exercise Price

 

Number

 

Weighted Average Exercise Price

$

2.39

-

$

2.55

 

6,500

 

6.4

 

$

2.44

 

5,375

 

$

2.45

$

2.76

-

$

3.80

 

4,501

 

5.7

 

$

3.03

 

4,501

 

$

3.03

$

4.06

-

$

4.66

 

11,667

 

6.2

 

$

4.66

 

8,750

 

$

4.66

 

 

 

 

 

 

22,668

 

6.2

 

$

3.70

 

18,626

 

$

3.63

Based upon an estimated common stock price of $0.51 at December 31, 2007, the intrinsic value of all MTI Micro’s outstanding and exercisable options are zero, since all exercise prices are above the estimated common stock fair value price.

On December 30, 2005, the Company granted options to acquire 1,021,213 shares of MTI common stock, par value $0.01 per share, to certain Optionees. The options have an exercise price per share of $2.80 (the closing price of the Company’s common stock on December 30, 2005). The Company issued the options pursuant to a November 28, 2005 stock option exchange offer. MTI Micro options outstanding for a purchase of a total of 2,392,947 shares of MTI Micro common stock, par value $0.01 per share, were tendered by the Optionees and then cancelled by MTI Micro as a result of this exchange. Each option is exercisable for one share of MTI common stock. The exchange rate was one option for each two MTI Micro options, rounded down to the nearest whole option, or if an individual had an MTI Micro option balance in excess of 150,000 options, then at a rate of one option for each four MTI Micro options in excess of 150,000 options. The exchange was accounted for in accordance with EITF 00-23 Issue 1 and no compensation expense was recorded.

Completion of Option Exchange

14.

Cash Flows - Supplemental Information

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2005

 

2006

 

2007

 

Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in investment and paid-in capital resulting from other investors’ activity in MTI Micro stock

 

$

(301

)

$

(1,284

)

$

(521

)

Cash Payments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Taxes paid (tax refunds), net

 

 

37

 

 

3

 

 

(10

)

On December 22, 2003, the Company announced the completion of the first phase of its stock option exchange offer. A total of 757,000 options with an average exercise price of approximately $19 per share were tendered by employees, officers and directors and then cancelled by the Company in exchange for the future issuance of options at a one-for-two ratio. New options totaling 341,000 were issued in the final phase of the exchange offer on June 23, 2004 at an exercise price of $6.17 per share to employees, officers and directors who were employed by the Company or served as directors of the Company from December 22, 2003, the acceptance date, through June 23, 2004. The exchange was accounted for in accordance with EITF 00-23 Issue 36(c) and no compensation expense was recorded.


 

 

F-22

MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Sale of Common Stock

Private Placement: The Company entered into a financing transaction with Fletcher International, Ltd. ("Fletcher"), on January 29, 2004 and amended the terms of such transaction on May 4, 2004. To date Fletcher has purchased 2,680,671 shares of our common stock for $18 million pursuant to such financing transaction - 1,418,842 shares at $7.048 per share and 1,261,829 shares at $6.34 per share. In addition, Fletcher has the right to purchase an additional $20 million of the Company's common stock, on one or more occasions, at a price of $6.023 (adjusted from $6.34) per share at any time prior to December 31, 2006. Fletcher also has the right to receive Company shares without payment upon the occurrence of certain events, including but not limited to, failing to register for resale with the SEC shares purchased by Fletcher on the agreed upon time table, a restatement of the Company's financial statements, change of control of the Company and issuance of securities at a price below Fl etcher's purchase price. We have filed registration statements covering all of the shares purchased by Fletcher to date, and in the event of any additional purchases we are obligated to file one or more registration statements covering the resale of such shares.

We filed a registration statement on January 6, 2005 covering the resale of 1,261,829 shares of our common stock purchased by Fletcher on December 22, 2004. The Company failed to meet its contractual obligation with Fletcher to have such registration statement declared effective by March 22, 2005 and therefore under the terms of the Fletcher agreement we were required to issue additional shares of common stock to Fletcher and the exercise price for the Fletcher additional investment rights has been reduced to $6.023 per share. We were required to issue a number of shares of common stock that resulted in Fletcher having effectively made its December 2004 investment at a price per share that was lower than the actual price paid. We refer to this reduced exercise price as the "deemed exercise price." More specifically, for each month during which we fail to satisfy the registration requirement, the deemed exercise price is reduced by $0.317 per share. As a consequence, on April 20, 2005 w e issued 66,413 shares of common stock to Fletcher without any additional payment required by Fletcher, representing a deemed exercise price for Fletcher's December 2004 investment of $6.023 per share. In addition, since we are required to file a registration statement covering the resale of any such additional shares issued to Fletcher, we amended the registration statement initially filed in January 2005 to include the additional 66,413 shares of common stock. That registration statement, covering the resale of 1,328,242 shares of common stock, was declared effective by the SEC on April 21, 2005.

Plug Power Shares: On June 24, 2005, Fletcher notified the Company of its election to exercise in full its right to purchase from the Company certain shares of common stock of Plug Power. As a result of this election, Fletcher purchased 1,799,791 shares of Plug Power common stock from the Company at a price of $0.7226 per share, with proceeds to the Company of $1.301 million. This transaction closed on June 28, 2005 and, in connection with this exercise, the Company recognized a loss on the derivative immediately prior to exercise of $7.173 million and a gain on the sale of Plug Power common shares of $9.635 million.15.Derivatives

The Company hadheld or has outstanding as of December 31, the following derivative financial instruments:

 

 

2006

 

2007

Expiration

Derivatives issued:

 

 

 

 

 

Warrants, exercisable beginning June 20, 2007, to purchase the Company’s common stock issued to three investors at a purchase price of $2.27 per share

 

3,027,778

 

3,027,778

12/19/2011

Plug Power Investment Right Derivative:The Company placed 2,700,000 shares of Plug Power common stock in escrow that werewas available for purchase by Fletcher in certain instances. Fletcher could, on one or multiple occasions, from June 1, 2005 to December 31, 2006, exercise its right to purchase from usthe Company a number of shares of Plug Power common stock totaling $10,000,000$10,000 thousand divided by the prevailing price (as defined below) per share of Plug Power common stock, but only to the extent of the number of shares remaining in escrow. Commencing immediately after the SEC declared effective on May 20, 2004 the registration statement relating to shares of ourthe Company’s common stock owned by Fletcher, wethe Company had the right to have 250,000 of such shares released from escrow to us,the Company, on a monthly basis, in the event that on any day during such month, the prevailing price of ourthe Company’s common stock exceeds $6.343 (which price may have been adjusted to reflect stock splits, recombinations, stock dividends or the like).

The exercise price for the Plug Power investment right was $10,000,000$10,000 thousand less the positive difference between $18,000,000$18,000 thousand and the product of the sum of 2,680,671 shares multiplied by the prevailing price per share of ourthe Company’s common stock on the date Fletcher elected to exercise such right, all divided by the quotient obtained by dividing 10,000,000$10,000 thousand by the prevailing price of Plug Power common stock on the date date.

Fletcher elected to exercise such right. As used herein, a prevailing price is the average of the daily volume-weighted average price per share of common stock during the sixty-business-day period ending three days prior to the date Fletcher elects to exercise such right, provided however that the price may not exceed the average of the daily volume-weighted average prices for any ten business days within such sixty-business day period.

Additional Investment Rights: The additional investment rights provide

On June 24, 2005, Fletcher withnotified the Company of their election to exercise in full its right but not the obligation, to purchase in a single purchase or multiple purchases, up to an additional $20 millionfrom the Company certain shares of our common stock at any time prior to December 31, 2006of Plug Power. As a result of this election, Fletcher purchased 1,799,791 shares of Plug Power common stock from the Company at a price of $0.7226 per share, equalwith proceeds to $6.023 (adjusted from $6.34), which datethe Company of $1,301 thousand. This transaction closed on June 28, 2005 and, price may be extendedin connection with this exercise, the Company recognized a loss based on the intrinsic value of the derivative immediately prior to exercise of $7,173 thousand and adjusted, respectively,a gain on the sale based on the fair value of the underlying Plug Power common shares of $9,635 thousand.

Warrant Derivative to Purchase MTI Common Stock:The warrants issued during the Company’s December 2006 capital raise were legally freestanding, detachable and transferable by the holders. The features of the warrant allowed both straight cash exercises as well as cashless exercises. Due primarily to a stipulation in the event that we have not satisfied our contractual obligationswarrant agreement which allowed a potential cash settlement with respectthe holders if the Company was acquired by, or merged with a private company, these warrants were classified as an asset/liability derivative in accordance with SFAS No. 133 (paragraph 11) and EITF 00-19.

The estimated fair value of this warrant at the date issued was $1.27 per share, using a Black-Scholes Option Pricing model and assumptions similar to those used for valuing the registrationCompany’s employee share-based compensation. The fair value of the derivative is recorded in the “Derivative Liability” line on its financial statements, and is valued quarterly using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model. The assumptions used for resalethe valuations as of common stock issued or issuable to Fletcher.December 31 were as follows:

 

2006

 

2007

 

Expected life of option (days)

1,815

 

1,450

 

Risk-free interest rate

4.70

%

3.45

%

Expected volatility of stock

80.34

%

73.46

%

Expected dividend yield

None

 

None

 

F-23The Company recognizes changes in fair value in its Consolidated Statements of Operations in the line titled “Gain on derivatives.”


MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The table below illustrates the number of shares Fletcher would receive upon exercise of its $20 million additional investment right at a price per share equal to $6.023 (adjusted from $6.34) (such exercise price is subject to adjustment as described below under"Adjustment Provisions"). Further, the Company's 2004 private placement agreement with Fletcher provides that the maximum number of shares we could potentially issue to Fletcher is 8,330,411 shares.

Purchase Price MTI Stock

Shares of Common Stock Issuable in Exchange for $20 Million Investment

$6.023

3,320,604

Adjustment Provisions: The 2004 private placement agreement with Fletcher also provides that the Company may be required to issue additional shares to Fletcher, reduce the exercise prices described above for the additional investment rights and/or extend the investment term upon the occurrence of certain events (each as more fully described below) including:

Restatement : In the event we restate any portion of our financial statements prior to the first anniversary of the closing of any additional investment, the exercise price for the additional investment rights may be adjusted to equal the average price (as defined) of our common stock sixty days after we restate our financial statements if the average price of the Company's common stock sixty days after a restatement is five percent lower than the average price three days before the restatement (a "Qualifying Restatement"). In addition, with respect to any investments made prior to the time of the restatement, Fletcher would receive additional shares of common stock such that all such investments will have been effectively made at such adjusted exercise price.

The following table illustrates the number of additional shares of common stock Fletcher would receive without any additional payment on its part in the event that the average price of the Company's common stock sixty days after a restatement (as defined) is $4.00 per share and $3.00 per share.

 

Number of Shares

Qualifying

 

Investments

Issued at the time of the

Restatement

Additional Shares

To Date

Original Investments

Price

to be Issued

$18,000,000

2,680,671

$4.00

1,819,329

$18,000,000

2,680,671

$3.00

3,319,329

In response to comments received from the SEC staff of the Division of Corporation Finance, the Company previously amended its current Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 and its prior Annual Reports on Form 10-K for the years ended December 31, 2003 and December 31, 2002 to supplement the Company's financial statements with additional financial statements of SatCon Technology Corporation and Plug Power, which were all previously publicly available, and to include certain summary financial information for both companies in the relevant notes to the Company's consolidated financial statements. In the Company's opinion, the above do not constitute restatements for purposes of its agreement with Fletcher.

Change in Control: In the event of a change of control of our company prior to sixty days after the expiration of the additional investment term, we may have to issue additional shares of our common stock to Fletcher and the additional investment rights (including the right to purchase the Plug Power shares) may be accelerated. If the consideration per sharepaid to our shareholders in the change of control transaction is less than twice the amount of the price per share paid by Fletcher for any of its investments

F-24

MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

pursuant to the agreement with Fletcher or the certificate of additional investment rights, then we must issue to Fletcher a number of shares of our common stock such that all of its investments will have been effectively made at a price per share equal to such per sharechange of control consideration multiplied by 0.5.

Dilutive Issuances: If, after December 31, 2004 and ending December 31, 2006, we issue any equity securities at a price below $7.048 as it relates to the initial $10 million investment and $6.34 as it relates to any additional investments which have been made, the exercise price for the additional investment rights shall be adjusted to provide Fletcher "weighted average" anti-dilution protection and we must issue to Fletcher a number of additional shares such that all prior investments will have been effectively made at such adjusted exercise price.

Registration Obligations:In the event we fail to satisfy our contractual obligations to register for resale shares of common stock issued or issuable to Fletcher, then we must issue to Fletcher a number of additional shares to reflect the number of shares it would have acquired if its purchase price was based on the actual exercise price reduced by five percent for each month in which we fail to satisfy our obligations and adjust the exercise price for the additional investment rights to such lower price. In addition, such failure may result in an extension of the investment term for each day we fail to satisfy our registration obligations. These registration obligations include, among other things, maintaining the effectiveness of registration statements.

As described above, we failed to satisfy the registration requirement for the 1,261,829 shares of common stock purchased by Fletcher on December 22, 2004 until April 21, 2005.

Other: The 2004 private placement agreement also provides Fletcher certain other rights including, but not limited to, indemnification rights with respect to (1) breaches of representations, warranties and covenants contained in the agreements with Fletcher, and (2) misstatements in or omissions from the prospectus and the registration statement relating to shares of our common stock that Fletcher owns or may acquire.

Placement and Amendment Fees: In connection with the 2004 Private Placement, in February 2004 the Company paid placement fees, recorded in equity against the proceeds of the private placement, of $600 thousand to Chicago Investment Group, L.L.C. and issued a warrant to purchase 28,377 shares of the Company's common stock at an exercise price of $10.572 per share. The warrant was not exercisable until February 5, 2005 and expired unexercised on February 5, 2006. In connection with the May 2004 amendment of the private placement, the Company paid advisory fees of $300 thousand to Citigroup Global Markets Inc.

12. Earnings per Share

The following table sets forth the reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted per share computations for continuing operations for the years ended December 31:

(Dollars in thousands, except shares)

2005

2004

2003

Numerator

   

Loss from continuing operations

$ (15,094)

$ (4,191)

$ (572)

Denominator

   

Basic EPS:

   

Common shares outstanding, beginning of period

30,610,213

27,740,536

27,627,885

Weighted average common shares issued during the period

127,395

1,424,259

30,905

Weighted average common shares reacquired during the period

-

(3,617)

(2,800)

Denominator for basic earnings per common share - weighted average common shares

30,737,608

29,161,178

27,655,990

Diluted EPS:

   

Common shares outstanding, beginning of period

30,610,213

27,740,536

27,627,885

Weighted average common shares issued during the period

127,395

1,424,259

30,905

Weighted average common shares reacquired during the period

-

(3,617)

(2,800)

Denominator for diluted earnings per common share - weighted average common shares

30,737,608

29,161,178

27,655,990

F-25

MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

During 2005, options to purchase 5,041,242 shares of common stock at prices ranging from $0.54 to $20.92 per share, additional investment rights to purchase approximately 3,320,604 shares ($20,000,000 divided by $6.023 per share) of common stock with an exercise price of $6.023 per share and warrants to purchase 28,377 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $10.572 per share and options to purchase 78,461 shares of MTI Micro common stock at prices from $2.39 to $4.66 per share were outstanding but were not included in the computation of earnings per share-assuming dilution because the Company incurred a loss from continuing operations during this period and inclusion would be anti-dilutive. The MTI options expire between December 20, 2006, and December 18, 2015. The MTI Micro options expire between September 29, 2012, and September 18, 2015. Warrants for the purchase of 28,377 shares expired unexercised on February 5, 2006. Investment rights issued to Fletcher expire on December 31, 2006, su bject to extension in certain instances.

During 2004, options to purchase 3,752,063 shares of common stock at prices ranging from $0.54 to $20.92 per share, additional investment rights to purchase approximately 3,154,575 shares ($20,000,000 divided by $6.34 per share) of common stock with an exercise price of $6.34 per share and warrants to purchase 28,377 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $10.572 per share and options to purchase 2,876,881 shares of MTI Micro common stock at prices from $2.39 to $4.66 per share were outstanding but were not included in the computation of earnings per share-assuming dilution because the Company incurred a loss from continuing operations during this period and inclusion would be anti-dilutive. The MTI options expire between December 20, 2006, and December 16, 2014. The MTI Micro options expire between May 6, 2011, and December 12, 2014. Warrants for the purchase of 28,377 shares expired unexercised on February 5, 2006. Investment rights issued to Fletcher expire on December 31, 2006, subject t o extension in certain instances.

During 2003, options to purchase 2,875,150 shares of common stock at prices ranging from $0.54 to $20.92 per share and warrants to purchase 192,000 shares of common stock at $12.56 per share and options to purchase 1,570,711 shares of MTI Micro common stock at prices from $2.55 to $3.80 per share were outstanding but were not included in the computation of earnings per share-assuming dilution because the Company incurred a loss from continuing operations during this period and inclusion would be anti-dilutive. The MTI options expire between December 20, 2006, and September 8, 2013. The MTI Micro options expire between May 6, 2011, and December 14, 2013. The warrants expired unexercised on January 31, 2004.

13. Stock Based Compensation

MTI Option Plans

The 1999 Employee Stock Incentive Plan ("1999 Plan") was approved by shareholders during March 1999. The 1999 Plan provides that an initial aggregate number of 1 million shares of common stock may be awarded or issued. The number of shares which may be awarded under the 1999 Plan and awards outstanding have been adjusted for stock splits, and during 2005, 2004 and 2003, the total number of shares which may be awarded under the 1999 Plan were 4,500,000 shares. Under the 1999 Plan, the Board of Directors is authorized to award stock options to officers, employees and others.

The 1996 Stock Incentive Plan ("1996 Plan") was approved by shareholders during December 1996. The 1996 Plan provides that an initial aggregate number of 500,000 shares of common stock may be awarded or issued. The number of shares which may be awarded under the 1996 Plan may be increased by 10% of any increase in the number of outstanding shares of common stock for reasons other than shares issued under this 1996 Plan. The number of shares which may be awarded under the 1996 Plan and awards outstanding have been adjusted for stock splits and rights offerings, and during 2005, 2004 and 2003, the total number of shares which may be awarded under the 1996 Plan were 3,746,813, 3,478,746 and 3,478,746 shares, respectively. Under the 1996 Plan, the Board of Directors is authorized to award stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, and other stock-based incentives to officers, employees and others.

Options issued to employees generally vest 25% per year beginning one year after grant. Options issued to members of the Board generally vest upon grant. Certain options granted may be exercisable immediately or begin vesting immediately. Restricted stock awards generally vest one year after the date of grant. Option exercise prices are not less than 85 percent of the market value of the Company's common stock on the date of grant. Unexercised options generally terminate ten years after date of grant. The Company has elected to follow APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related Interpretations, in accounting for employee stock-based compensation and to provide the disclosures required under SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock Based Compensation. APB Opinion No. 25 requires no recognition of compensation expense for most of the stock-based compensation

F-26

MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

arrangements provided by the Company, namely, broad-based employee stock purchase plans and option grants where the exercise price is equal to or not less than 85 percent of the market value at the date of grant. However, APB Opinion No. 25 requires recognition of compensation expense for variable award plans over the vesting periods of such plans, based upon the then-current market values of the underlying stock. In contrast, SFAS No. 123 requires recognition of compensation expense for grants of stock, stock options, and other equity instruments, over the vesting periods of such grants, based on the estimated grant-date fair values of those grants.

Under the intrinsic-value-based method, compensation cost is the excess, if any, of the market value of the stock at grant over the amount an employee must pay to acquire the stock.

On December 30, 2005, the Company issued options to acquire 1,021,213 shares of MTI common stock, par value $0.01 per share, to certain employees, officers and directors of MTI and MTI MicroFuel Cells Inc. who previously held MTI Micro options (the "Optionees"). The options have an exercise price per share of $2.80 (the closing price of the Company's common stock on December 30, 2005). The Company issued the options pursuant to a November 28, 2005 stock option exchange offer. MTI Micro options outstanding for a purchase of a total of 2,392,947 shares of MTI Micro common stock, par value $0.01 per share, were tendered by the Optionees and then cancelled by MTI Micro as a result of this exchange. Each option is exercisable for one share of MTI common stock. The exchange rate was one option for each two MTI Micro options, rounded down to the nearest whole option, or if an individual had an MTI Micro option balance in excess of 150,000 options, then at a rate of one option for each four MTI Micr o options in excess of 150,000 options. The exchange was accounted for in accordance with EITF 00-23 Issue 1 and no compensation expense was recorded.

On December 22, 2003, the Company announced the completion of the first phase of its stock option exchange offer. A total of 757,000 options with an average exercise price of approximately $19 per share were tendered by employees, officers and directors and then cancelled by the Company in exchange for the future issuance of options at a one-for-two ratio. New options totaling 341,000 were issued in the final phase of the exchange offer on June 23, 2004 at an exercise price of $6.17 per share to employees, officers and directors who were employed by the Company or served as directors of the Company from December 22, 2003, the acceptance date, through June 23, 2004. The exchange was accounted for in accordance with EITF 00-23 Issue 36(c) and no compensation expense was recorded.

During 2005, the Company awarded 50,000 shares of common stock and 50,000 restricted shares of common stock which vested over a one-year period. During 2000, the Company awarded 60,000 options to acquire common stock to consultants and certain of the shares underlying options vest over a four-year period. The compensation expense related to the intrinsic value of performance-based, unrestricted and restricted stock awards was recorded in "Selling, general and administrative expenses" in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for each of the years ended December 31:

(Dollars in thousands)

2005

2004

2003

SFAS 123 - Consultants

$ -

$ -

$ 32

Stock

124

-

-

Restricted stock

45

-

40

Stock options

633

-

-

Total stock-based compensation expense

$ 802

$ -

$ 72

The 2005 stock-based compensation expense includes $438 thousand of stock-based compensation expense recorded as a result of accelerating the vesting and/or extending the time to exercise options after termination but not in excess of the original contractual life of the options. These changes were made in connection with employment, termination and change in status (employee to consultant) arrangements.

 

 

 

 

16.Commitments and Contingencies

 

Lawrence Litigation

F-27

MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Presented below is a summary of the Company's stock option plans' activity for the years ended December 31:

2005

2004

2003

Shares under option, beginning

3,752,063

2,875,150

3,327,525

Granted

1,467,880

1,097,500

439,750

Exercised

(148,575)

(193,768)

(128,375)

Canceled

(30,126)

(26,819)

(763,750)

Shares under option, ending

5,041,242

3,752,063

2,875,150

Options exercisable

4,197,029

3,331,968

2,511,650

Remaining shares available for granting of options

1,363,214

2,632,901

3,703,582

    

The weighted average exercise price is as follows for each of the years ended December 31:

 

2005

2004

2003

Shares under option, beginning

$4.06

$3.29

$ 7.01

Granted:

   

Exercise price equal to fair market value at grant date

2.85

5.72

2.04

Exercised

2.20

2.11

1.72

Canceled

5.53

3.70

19.01

Shares under option, ending

3.76

4.06

3.29

Options exercisable, ending

3.85

4.03

3.45

The following table summarizes information for options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2005:

Options Outstanding

 

Options Exercisable

  

Weighted

   
  

Average

Weighted

 

Weighted

Exercise

 

Remaining

Average

 

Average

Price

 

Contractual

Exercise

 

Exercise

Range

Number

Life

Price

Number

Price

$ 0.54 - $ 0.77

293,475

1.5

$ 0.67

293,475

$ 0.67

$ 0.98 - $ 1.34

470,000

2.6

$ 1.28

470,000

$ 1.28

$ 1.65 - $ 2.04

543,200

5.2

$ 1.87

466,262

$ 1.85

$ 2.49 - $ 3.42

1,961,400

7.5

$ 2.89

1,362,875

$ 2.94

$ 3.74 - $ 4.83

651,667

5.3

$ 4.15

611,167

$ 4.14

$ 6.01 - $ 6.40

850,000

6.6

$ 6.17

721,750

$ 6.17

$ 9.25 - $ 12.97

211,500

4.5

$10.65

211,500

$10.65

$ 20.92

60,000

1.9

$20.92

60,000

$20.92

 

5,041,242

5.8

$ 3.76

4,197,029

$ 3.85

The fair value of options granted, which is amortized to expense over the option vesting period in determining the pro forma impact, is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes Option-Pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions for each of the years ended December 31:

2005

2004

2003

Expected life of option

5 yrs

5 yrs

5 yrs

Risk-free interest rate

4.28%

3.77%

2.88%

Expected volatility of the Company's stock

77.3%

80.8%

93.4%

Expected dividend yield on the Company's stock

0%

0%

0%

F-28

MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The weighted average fair value of options granted for each of the years ended December 31 is as follows:

 

2005

2004

2003

Fair value of each option granted

$ 2.85

$ 3.93

$ 1.48

Number of options granted

1,467,880

1,097,500

439,750

Fair value of all options granted

$4,187,301

$4,133,652

$650,830

In accordance with SFAS No. 123, the weighted average fair value of stock options granted is required to be based on a theoretical statistical model using the preceding Black-Scholes Option-Pricing model assumptions.

The weighted average fair value of stock granted for each of the years ended December 31 is as follows:

2005

2004

2003

Fair value of each share granted

$ 2.49

$ -

$ -

Number of shares granted

50,000

-

-

Fair value of all shares granted

$124,500

$ -

$ -

The weighted average fair value of restricted stock granted for each of the years ended December 31 is as follows:

2005

2004

2003

Fair value of each restricted share granted

$ 2.49

$ -

$ -

Number of restricted shares granted

50,000

-

-

Fair value of all restricted shares granted

$124,500

$ -

$ -

MTI Micro Option Plan

The MTI MicroFuel Cells Inc. 2001 Employee, Director and Consultant Stock Option Plan (Amended and Restated as of September 23, 2004) ("2001 MTI Micro Plan") was approved by MTI Micro's shareholders in 2001. The 2001 MTI Micro Plan provides that an initial aggregate number of 1,766,000 shares of MTI Micro common stock may be awarded. The number of shares which may be awarded under the 2001 MTI Micro Plan may be and has been increased by MTI Micro's Board of Directors. The number of shares which may be awarded under the 2001 MTI Micro Plan and awards outstanding have been adjusted for a 2004 reverse stock split, and during 2005, 2004 and 2003, the total number of shares which may be awarded under the 2001 MTI Micro Plan were 3,416,667, 3,416,667 and 2,166,667 shares. Under the 2001 MTI Micro Plan, the MTI Micro Board of Directors is authorized to award stock options to officers, directors, employees and consultants.

Options issued to employees generally vest 25% per year beginning one year after grant. Options issued to members of the Board generally vest 50% per year beginning one year after grant. Certain options granted may be exercisable immediately or begin vesting immediately. Option exercise prices are determined by MTI Micro's Board of Directors. Unexercised options generally terminate ten years after date of grant. MTI Micro has elected to follow APB Opinion No. 25,Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related Interpretations, in accounting for employee stock-based compensation and to provide the disclosures required under SFAS No. 123,Accounting for Stock Based Compensation. APB Opinion No. 25 requires no recognition of compensation expense for most of the stock-based compensation arrangements provided by MTI Micro, namely, broad-based employee stock purchase plans and option grants where the exercise price is equal to or not less than 85 percent of the market v alue at the date of grant. However, APB Opinion No. 25 requires recognition of compensation expense for variable award plans over the vesting periods of such plans, based upon the then-current market values of the underlying stock. In contrast, SFAS No. 123 requires recognition of compensation expense for grants of stock, stock options, and other equity instruments, over the vesting periods of such grants, based on the estimated grant-date fair values of those grants.

Presented below is a summary of compensation expense recorded in "Selling, general and administrative expenses" in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for each of the years ended December 31:

(Dollars in thousands)

2005

2004

2003

Stock options

$ 201

$ 8

$ -

Total stock-based compensation expense

$ 201

$ 8

$ -

F-29

MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Presented below is a summary of the 2001 MTI Micro stock option plans activity for the years ended December 31:

2005

2004

2003

Shares under option, beginning

2,876,881

1,570,711

496,687

Granted

358,000

1,508,110

1,089,276

Exercised

(10)

(57,626)

(167)

Canceled

(3,156,410)

(144,314)

(15,085)

Shares under option, ending

78,461

2,876,881

1,570,711

Options exercisable

35,752

604,881

266,810

Remaining shares available for granting of options

3,280,403

481,993

595,789

The weighted average exercise price for MTI Micro options is as follows for each of the years ended December 31:

 

2005

2004

2003

Shares under option, beginning

$3.00

$ 2.94

$ 3.75

Granted:

   

Exercise price equal to fair market value at grant date

3.68

4.16

2.56

Exercise price less than fair market value at grant date

-

2.39

-

Exercised

2.55

3.28

3.80

Canceled

3.12

3.31

2.64

Shares under option, ending

3.22

3.00

2.94

Options exercisable, ending

2.93

3.14

3.71

The following table summarizes information for MTI Micro's options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2005:

Outstanding Options

 

Options Exercisable

  

Weighted

Weighted

 

Weighted

Exercise

 

Average

Average

 

Average

Price

 

Remaining

Exercise

 

Exercise

Range

Number

Contractual Life

Price

Number

Price

$ 2.39 - $2.55

47,501

8.0

$ 2.49

27,376

$ 2.54

$ 2.76 - $3.80

4,501

7.7

$ 3.03

2,542

$ 3.12

$ 4.06 - $4.66

26,459

8.6

$ 4.57

5,834

$ 4.66

 

78,461

8.2

$ 3.22

35,752

$ 2.93

The fair value of MTI Micro options granted, which is amortized to expense over the option vesting period in determining the pro forma impact, is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes Option-Pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions for each of the years ended December 31:

2005

2004

2003

Expected life of option

5 yrs

5 yrs

5 yrs

Risk-free interest rate

4.28%

3.77%

2.88%

Expected volatility of the MTI Micro's stock

77.3%

80.8%

93.4%

Expected dividend yield on MTI Micro's stock

0%

0%

0%

The weighted average fair value of MTI Micro options granted for each of the years ended December 31 is as follows:

 

2005

2004

2003

Fair value of each option granted

$ 3.68

$ 3.11

$ 2.56

Number of options granted

358,000

1,508,110

1,089,276

Fair value of all options granted

$930,890

$3,851,202

$2,069,936

F-30

MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

In accordance with SFAS No. 123, the weighted average fair value of stock options granted is required to be based on a theoretical statistical model using the preceding Black-Scholes Option-Pricing model assumptions.

14. Gain on Sale of Securities Available for Sale

The Company sold shares of the following securities and recognized gains and proceeds for each of the years ended December 31 as follows:

(Dollars in thousands, except shares)

2005

2004

2003

Plug Power

   

Shares sold

1,899,791

480,000

2,000,000

Proceeds

$ 1,969

$ 4,479

$10,251

Gross gain on sales

$ 10,125

$ 3,626

$ 6,698

SatCon

Shares sold

-

-

773,600

Proceeds

$ -

$ -

$ 1,403

Gross gain on sales

$ -

$ -

$ 785

Gross loss on sales

$ -

$ -

$ -

Total net gain on sales

$ 10,125

$ 3,626

$ 7,483

15. Retirement Plan

The Company maintains a voluntary savings and retirement plan (Internal Revenue Code Section 401(k) Plan) covering substantially all employees. The Company plan allows eligible employees to contribute a percentage of their compensation and the Company makes additional voluntary contributions in amounts as determined by management and the Board of Directors. The investment of employee contributions to the plan is self-directed. The cost of the plan was $272, $242 and $187 thousand for 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

16. Commitments and Contingencies

Litigation

Lawrence: On September 9, 1998, Barbara Lawrence, the Lawrence Group, Inc. ("Lawrence"(“Lawrence”), and certain other Lawrence-related entities ("Plaintiffs"(“Plaintiffs”) initially filed suit in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of New York (“Bankruptcy Court”) and the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York (“District Court”), which were subsequently consolidated in the District Court, against First Albany Corporation, ("FAC"now known as Broadpoint Capital, Inc. (“BCI”), Mechanical Technology,the Company, Dale Church, Edward Dohring, Beno Sternlicht, Alan Goldberg and George McNamee (former(Church, Dohring, Sternlicht, Goldberg and McNamee are former Directors of the Company), Marty Mastroianni (former President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company), and 33 other individuals ("Defendants"(“Defendants”) who purchased a total of 820,909 (2,462,727 shares post split) sharesshares(2,462,727 post-split) of the Company'sCompany’s stock from the Plaintiffs. The case concerns the Defendants'Defendants’ 1997 purchase of Mechanical Technology sharesthe Company’s common stock from the Plaintiffs at the price of $2.25 per share ($0.75 per share post split). FACBCI acted as Placement Agent forin connection with the Defendants in the n egotiationnegotiation and sale of the shares, andincluding in proceedings before the Bankruptcy Court, for the Northern District of New York, which approved the sale in September 1997.

Plaintiffs claim that the Defendants failed to disclose material inside information concerning Plug Power, LLC to the Plaintiffs in connection with the sale and thereforethat the $2.25 per share ($0.75 per share post split) purchase price was unfair. Plaintiffs are seeking damages of $5 million plus punitive damages and costs. In April 1999, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint, which was denied by the Bankruptcy Court. On appeal in October 2000, Plaintiffs' cause of action wasPlaintiffs’ claims were dismissed by the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York.Court. In November 2000, Plaintiffs filed an appeal of that dismissal with the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. In June 2002, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the District Court decision in part and remanded the case for further consideration of the Plaintiff'sPlaintiffs’ claims as motions to modify the Bankruptcy Court sale order. The Plaintiff'sPlaintiffs’ claims have now been referred back to Bankruptcy Court for such consideration. InBy order and decision dated September 30, 2003, th ethe Bankruptcy Court issued an order permitting Plaintiffs to conductallowed certain limited discovery concerning how First Albany formed an opinion about the Company's stock up until the date the Stock Purchase Agreement was executed. Discovery has commenced.to proceed, and this process is still underway.

F-31

MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The Company believes the claims have no merit and intends to defend them vigorously.Thevigorously. The Company cannot predict theoutcome of the claims nor reasonably estimate a range of possible loss given the current status of the litigation. Accordingly, no amounts have been reserved for this matter.

Leases

The Company and its subsidiaries lease certain manufacturing, laboratory and office facilities. The leases generally provide for the Company to pay either an increase over a base year level for taxes, maintenance, insurance and other costs of the leased properties or the Company'sCompany’s allocated share of insurance, taxes, maintenance and other costs of leased properties. The leases contain renewal provisions.

Future minimum rental payments required under non-cancelable operating leases are (dollars in thousands): $327 in 2006, $322 in 2007, $319$694 in 2008, $289$659 in 2009, $1 in 2010 and $0 in 2010.2011 and 2012. Rent expense under all leases was $746, $706$748, and $636$687 thousand for 2005, 20042006, and 2003,2007, respectively. Contingent rent included in the rent expense amounts was $11, $53$3, and $46$3 thousand for 2005, 20042006, and 2003,2007, respectively.

Warranties

Warranties

Below is a reconciliation of changes in product warranty liabilities at December 31:

   

(Dollars in thousands)

2005

2004

Balance, beginning of period

$ 38

$ 28

Accruals for warranties issued

30

38

Accruals related to pre-existing warranties (including changes in estimates)

(31)

(16)

Settlements made (in cash or in kind)

(17)

(12)

Balance, end of period

$ 20

$ 38

(Dollars in thousands)

 

2006

 

2007

 

Balance, beginning of period

 

$

20

 

$

19

 

Accruals for warranties issued

 

 

25

 

 

126

 

Accruals related to pre-existing warranties (including changes in estimates)

 

 

(12

)

 

 

Settlements made (in cash or in kind)

 

 

(14

)

 

(73

)

Balance, end of period

 

$

19

 

$

72

 

Licenses

TheLicenses

On January 24, 2008, the Company licenses, on acancelled its non-exclusive basis, certain DMFC technology fromlicensing agreement with Los Alamos National Laboratory ("LANL"(“LANL”). Under this covering certain direct methanol fuel cell technology. This agreement, the Company is required to pay future minimumwhich was last amended on May 17, 2006, prescribed annual license fees of $250 thousand yearly throughranging from $35,000 in 2008 to $100,000 in 2019.

Effective, July 6, 2005, MTI Micro entered into an exclusive field-of-use patent license agreement with LANL. Under this agreement, MTI Micro The Company paid a non-refundable License Issue Feeone-time fee of $30 thousand upon execution of$50,000 to cancel the agreement.

Under both LANL licenses, license payments made in any year can be applied against royalties dueagreement, and total annual fees in any year shall not exceed $1 million. Also under both LANL licenses, once products are being sold,no future royalties will be based on 2% ofpaid. The Company cancelled this agreement because it no longer considers the first $50 million of net sales, 1% on net sales in excess of $50 million but less than $100 million and .5% on net sales in excess of $100 million Any royalties due shall not exceed 2% of net sales.direct methanol fuel cell technology licensed from LANL to be applicable to its future products.


MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Under the NYSERDA contract, MTI Micro agreed to pay NYSERDA a royalty of 1.5%5.0% of the sales price of any product sold incorporating IP developed pursuant to the NYSERDA contract ifcontract. If the product is manufactured by a New York State manufacturer. Thismanufacturer, this royalty increasesis reduced to 5% if the manufacturer is not deemed to be a New York State manufacturer. In any event, the royalty is1.5%. Total royalties are subject to a cap equal to two times the total contract funds paid by NYSERDA to MTI Micro, asand may be reduced to reflect any New York State jobs created by MTI Micro.

Employment Agreements

The Company has employment agreements with certain employees that provide severance payments, certain other payments, accelerated vesting and exercise extension periods of certain options upon termination of employment under certain circumstances, as defined in the applicable agreements. As of December 31, 2005,2007, the Company'sCompany’s potential minimum obligation to these employees was approximately $751$753 thousand.

Guaranty Under Gillette Agreement

The Company agreed not to assert any defenses that it might have arising out of or related to the Investment Company Act ("Investment Company Defense") to any "claim, action, cause of action, suit, litigation, arbitration, charge, complaint, demand, notice or proceeding

F-32

MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

brought by Gillette, and to defend, indemnify and hold Gillette and the Gillette indemnities harmless for all losses arising out of or related to non-compliance with the Investment Company Act. Because the Company has already paid the full amount of the $20 million guarantee under the agreement and agreed not to assert an Investment Company Defense, the Company's liability pursuant to this indemnification is likely to be zero. Further, on July 18, 2005 the Company withdrew its application to the SEC requesting that they either declare that the Company is not an investment company because it is primarily engaged in another business or exempt it from the provisions of the Investment Company Act. Following discussions and other communications with the SEC staff in which the staff expressed the view that the application was no longer necessary. Since the value of the Company's interests in Plug Power has decreased in relation to its total assets, the Company believes that it is not an investment company s ubject to the regulations of the Investment Company Act.

Investment Company Act

The Company's securities available for sale constitute investment securities under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the "Investment Company Act"). In general, a company may be deemed to be an investment company if it owns investment securities with a value exceeding 40% of its total assets, subject to certain exclusions and exemptions.

Investment companies are subject to registration under, and compliance with, the Investment Company Act unless a particular exemption or safe harbor provision applies. If the Company were to be deemed an investment company, the Company would become subject to the requirements of the Investment Company Act. As a consequence, the Company would be prohibited from engaging in certain businesses or issuing certain securities, certain of the Company's contracts might be voidable, and the Company might be subject to civil and criminal penalties for noncompliance.

Until 2001, the Company qualified for a safe harbor exemption under the Investment Company Act based upon the level of its ownership of shares of Plug Power and its influence over Plug Power's management or policies. However, since the Company began selling shares of Plug Power, this safe harbor exemption is no longer available.

On December 3, 2001, the Company made an application to the SEC requesting that they either declare that the Company is not an investment company because it is primarily engaged in another business or exempt it from the provisions of the Investment Company Act. The Company amended this application on October 20, 2003. On July 18, 2005, the Company requested that the application be withdrawn following discussions and other communications with the SEC staff in which the staff expressed the view that the application was no longer necessary. Since the value of the Company's interests in Plug Power has decreased in relation to its total assets, the Company believes that it is not an investment company subject to the regulations of the Investment Company Act.

If the Company was deemed to be an investment company and could not find another safe harbor or exemption and failed to register as an investment company, the SEC could require the Company to sell its interest in Plug Power, until the value of these securities is further reduced in relation to the Company's total assets. This could result in sales of the Company's securities in quantities of shares at depressed prices and the Company may never realize anticipated benefits from, or may incur losses on, these sales. Further, the Company may be unable to sell some securities due to contractual or legal restrictions or the inability to locate a suitable buyer. Moreover, the Company may incur tax liabilities when selling assets.

Contract Losses

During 2004,2005, MTI Micro entered into a fixed price-cost type completionprice contract with Saft America, Inc. (“SAFT”) under the U.S. Army.Army CECOM contract. The contract which totaled $250total fixed price to be paid at the completion was amended on November 14, 2006 from $470 thousand permitted monthly cost progress payments and called for the delivery of five DMFC power system units. These prototypes required substantial engineering to meet the performance requirements$418 thousand, in recognition of the customer and atelimination of Milestone 4. As of December 31, 2004,2006, MTI Micro accrued $540 thousand for the then anticipated cost needed to complete the project. The contract was completed on November 25, 2005. Additionally, other contracts had forecasted costs in excess of this revised contract values asvalue of December 31, 2004 for which MTI Micro had$66 thousand, and accrued $17 thousandthis amount for the then anticipated cost overrunsoverrun for the projects. As of December 31, 2005 no amounts are accrued for anticipated costs to complete open projects.this project. The project was completed during February 2007.

 

F-33

MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

17.

17.

Related Party Transactions

Management believes transactions among related parties are as fair to the Company as obtainable from unaffiliated third parties.

Alan P. Goldberg,

The Company purchases materials from E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company (“DuPont”), a member ofstockholder in MTI Micro. Such purchases totaled $130 for the board of directors of MTI Micro, is the Chief Executive Officer of First Albany Companies, Inc. FAC owned 1,116,040 shares or approximately 3.61% of the Company's common stock atyear ended December 31, 2005.

On December 19, 2005, MTI Micro entered into a Market Development Agreement with SES Americom Inc. ("SES"). Robert Phelan is Senior Vice President of SES and is a sibling of William Phelan, a director of the Company.

During August 2004, Dr. William Perry,the Company’s December 2006 capital raise, Sidney V. Gold, a member of the board of directors ofstockholder in MTI Micro, purchased through the exercise5,000 units consisting of stock options 56,668500,000 shares of MTI Micro.

On March 29, 2004, the Company acquired 4,762Company’s common stock and warrants exercisable for five years to purchase an additional 250,000 shares of its common stock from its then CEO, Dale Church, in connection with a revised tax liability of Mr. Church resulting from the vesting of restricted stock in October 2003.at $2.27 per share. The Company had previously acquired 15,724 shares in connection with the payment of Mr. Church's original tax liability as reported on October 28, 2003.

On September 19, 2003, Gillette invested $1 million in MTI Micro pursuant to a strategic alliance agreement and on October 29, 2003, Jeong Kim, a member of the board of directors of MTI Micro, invested $1 million in MTI Micro. (See Notes 3 and 19)

In connection with the NIST contract billings, as of December 31, 2004, the Company had a liability to DuPont for approximately $47 thousand. The Company also purchases materials from DuPont; such purchases totaled $130, $253 and $190 thousand in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The Company has a liability for materials purchases to DuPont as of December 31, 2005 and 2004 of $2 and $0 thousand, respectively. These liabilities are included in the financial statement line "Accrued liabilities - related parties." The Company has a net receivable due from DuPont for material purchases as of December 31, 2004 of $2 thousand. This receivable is included in the financial statement line "Other receivables - related parties."

During 2003, the Company sold 773,600 shares of SatCon Technology Corporation ("SatCon") common stock and as of December 31, 2003 held no shares of SatCon common stock. David B. Eisenhaure, a director of the Company at the time of such transaction,purchase price per unit was President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of SatCon during 2003.$180.00.

 

18. Discontinued Operations

The sale of the Company's Technology Division, the sole component of the Company's former Technology segment, to NYFM, Incorporated (a wholly-owned subsidiary of Foster-Miller, Inc., a Waltham, Massachusetts-based technology company) was completed on March 31, 1998. The Technology Division has been reported as a discontinued operation since December 26, 1997. The Company received approximately $13 thousand, net of taxes as contingent sales proceeds from NYFM, Incorporated in 2003. This amount is included in the financial statement line, "Income from discontinued operations."

There were no liabilities of the Company's discontinued operations as of December 31, 2005 and 2004.

F-34

MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

19.

18.

Geographic and Segment Information

The Company sells its products on a worldwide basis with its principal markets listed in the table below where information on product revenue and funded research and development revenue is summarized by geographic area for the Company as a whole for each of the years ended December 31:

(Dollars in thousands)

 

 

2005

 

2006

 

2007

 

Geographic Area

2005

2004

2003

Product revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

United States

$4,739

$6,373

$4,602

 

$

4,751

 

$

4,737

 

$

5,453

 

Japan

 

 

628

 

 

1,762

 

 

2,516

 

Singapore

 

 

31

 

 

355

 

 

286

 

Other Pacific Rim

 

 

202

 

 

279

 

 

307

 

Europe

115

247

227

 

 

96

 

 

175

 

 

161

 

Japan

628

353

308

Pacific Rim

233

314

245

South America

100

-

13

Russia

56

-

2

Israel

19

87

34

China

20

65

48

Canada

87

39

18

Rest of World

15

52

50

 

 

304

 

 

359

 

 

305

 

Total product revenue

6,012

7,530

5,547

 

$

6,012

 

$

7,667

 

$

9,028

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Funded research and development revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

South Korea

 

$

 

$

427

 

$

448

 

United States

1,829

1,040

2,311

 

 

1,829

 

 

62

 

 

1,108

 

Total funded research and development revenue

 

$

1,829

 

$

489

 

$

1,556

 

Total revenue

$7,841

$8,570

$7,858

 

$

7,841

 

$

8,156

 

$

10,584

 

Revenues are attributed to regions based on the location of customers.

Total product revenues contributed by product lines and their percentage of total product revenues for each of the years ended December 31 are shown below:


2005

2004

2003

(Dollars in thousands)

Dollars

Percent

Dollars

Percent

Dollars

Percent

Test and Measurement Instrumentation Products:

Aviation

$ 3,013

50.12%

$4,027

53.48%

$ 2,931

52.84%

General Gaging

2,688

44.71

2,393

31.78%

2,289

41.26

Semiconductor

311

5.17

1,110

14.74%

327

5.90

Total

$ 6,012

100%

$7,530

100%

$ 5,547

100%

MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The Company operates in two business segments,New Energyand Test and Measurement Instrumentation. The New Energyenergy segment is focused on commercializing DMFCs.direct methanol fuel cells. The Test and Measurementmeasurement Instrumentation segment designs, manufactures, markets and services computer-based balancing systems for aircraft engines, high performance test and measurement instruments and systems, and wafer characterization tools for the semiconductor industry. The Company'sCompany’s principal operations are located in North America.

The accounting policies of the New Energynew energy and Testtest and Measurement Instrumentationmeasurement instrumentation segments are the same assimilar to those described in the summary of significant accounting policies (See Note 1)2). The Company evaluates performance based on profit or loss from operations before income taxes, accounting changes, items management does not deem relevant to segment performance, and interest income and expense. Inter-segment sales are not significant.

Total product revenues contributed by the test and measurement instrumentation products segment and their percentage of total product revenue for each of the years ended December 31 are shown below:

(Dollars in thousands)

 

2005

 

 

2006

 

 

2007

 

 

 

Sales

 

%

 

 

 

 

Sales

 

%

 

 

 

 

Sales

 

%

 

Aviation

 

$

3,013

 

50.12

%

 

 

$

2,990

 

39.00

%

 

 

$

3,664

 

40.58

%

General Gauging

 

 

2,688

 

44.71

 

 

 

 

4,165

 

54.32

 

 

 

 

4,489

 

49.72

 

Semiconductor

 

 

311

 

5.17

 

 

 

 

512

 

6.68

 

 

 

 

875

 

9.70

 

Total

 

$

6,012

 

100.00

%

 

 

$

7,667

 

100.00

%

 

 

$

9,028

 

100.00

%

Total Foreign-Based Revenue

 

$

1,261

 

20.97

%

 

 

$

2,930

 

38.22

%

 

 

$

3,557

 

39.40

%

In the Testtest and Measurement Instrumentation Segment, in 2005,measurement instrumentation segment, the U.S. Air Force accounted for $2.385 million$2,385 thousand or 30.4% of total revenue;revenue in 2004, the U.S. Air Force2005, $1,774 thousand or 23.1% of total product revenue in 2006, and $2,375 thousand or 26.3% of total product revenue in 2007. Sales to a Japanese distributor accounted for $3.508 million$1,757 thousand or 40.9%22.9% of total revenues;product revenue in 2006, and $2,501 thousand or 27.7% of total product revenue in 2003, the U.S. Air Force accounted for $2.261 million or 28.8% of product revenues.2007.

F-35

MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

In the New Energynew energy Segment, in 2005,the DOE accounted for $.930 million$930 thousand or 11.9% of total revenue;funded research and development revenue in 2003, NIST2005, $63 thousand or 12.8% of total funded research and development revenue in 2006, and $675 thousand or 43.4% of total funded research and development revenue in 2007. Samsung accounted for $1.278$426 thousand or 16.3%87.2% of total revenue.funded research and development revenue in 2006 and $448 thousand or 28.9% of total funded research and development revenue in 2007, while SAFT accounted for $418 thousand or 26.8% of total funded research and development revenue in 2007.

Summarized financial information concerning the Company'sCompany’s reportable segments is shown in the following table. The "Other"“Other” column includes corporate related items and items such as income taxes or unusual items, which are not allocated to reportable segments. The "Reconciling Items"“Reconciling Items” column includes minority interests in a consolidated subsidiary. In addition, segments'segments’ non-cash items include any depreciation and amortization in reported profit or loss. The New Energynew energy segment figures include the Company's micro fuel cellCompany’s MFC operations, equity securities of Plug Power, and SatCon, gains on the sale of these securities, and (losses) gains related to the embedded derivative for the purchase of Plug Power common stock and warrants to purchase SatCon common stock.

(Dollars in thousands)

Test and

Measurement

Reconciling

Consolidated

New Energy

Instrumentation

Other

Items

Totals

Year Ended December 31, 2005

Product revenue

$ -

$ 6,012

$ -

$ -

$ 6,012

Funded research and

development revenue

1,829

-

-

-

1,829

Research and product

development expenses

8,546

1,125

-

-

9,671

Selling, general and

administrative expenses

3,772

2,188

4,927

-

10,887

Loss on derivatives

(10,407)

-

-

-

(10,407)

Segment (loss) profit from continuing

operations before income taxes,

equity in holdings' losses and

minority interests

(13,708)

(74)

(1,167)

-

(14,949)

Segment (loss) profit

(13,708)

(74)

(2,754)

1,442

(15,094)

Total assets

20,996

1,962

18,309

-

41,267

Securities available for sale

18,947

-

-

-

18,947

Capital expenditures

783

123

98

-

1,004

Depreciation and amortization

576

69

608

-

1,253

Year Ended December 31, 2004

Product revenue

$ -

$ 7,530

$ -

$ -

$ 7,530

Funded research and

development revenue

1,040

-

-

-

1,040

Research and product

development expenses

11,811

1,149

-

-

12,960

Selling, general and

administrative expenses

1,395

1,677

3,253

-

6,325

Gain on derivatives

614

-

-

-

614

Segment (loss) profit from continuing

operations before income taxes,

equity in holdings' losses and

minority interests

(8,970)

1,530

(1,681)

-

(9,121)

Segment (loss) profit

(8,970)

1,530

1,883

1,366

(4,191)

Total assets

47,940

2,373

16,517

-

66,830

Securities available for sale

17,678

-

-

-

17,678

Securities available for sale - restricted

16,497

-

-

-

16,497

Derivative liability

1,125

-

-

-

1,125

Capital expenditures

942

64

828

-

1,834

Depreciation and amortization

441

68

402

-

911

(Dollars in thousands)

 

 

New Energy

 

 

Test and

Measurement Instrumentation

 

 

Other

 

 

Reconciling Items

 

 

Consolidated Totals

 

Year Ended December 31, 2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Product revenue

 

$

 

$

6,012

 

$

 

$

 

$

6,012

 

Funded research and development revenue

 

 

1,829

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,829

 

Research and product development expenses

 

 

8,546

 

 

1,125

 

 

 

 

 

 

9,671

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

 

 

3,772

 

 

2,188

 

 

4,927

 

 

 

 

10,887

 

Gain on securities available for sale

 

 

10,125

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10,125

 

Loss on derivatives

 

 

(10,407

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(10,407

)

Segment (loss) profit from continuing operations before income taxes, equity in holdings’ losses and minority interests

 

 

(13,708

)

 

(74

)

 

(1,167

)

 

 

 

(14,949

)

Segment (loss) profit

 

 

(13,708

)

 

(74

)

 

(2,754

)

 

1,442

 

 

(15,094

)

Total assets

 

 

20,996

 

 

1,962

 

 

18,309

 

 

 

 

41,267

 

Securities available for sale

 

 

18,947

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

18,947

 

Capital expenditures

 

 

783

 

 

123

 

 

98

 

 

 

 

1,004

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

576

 

 

69

 

 

608

 

 

 

 

1,253

 


MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

 

F-36

(Dollars in thousands)

 

New Energy

 

Test and

Measurement Instrumentation

 

Other

 

Reconciling Items

 

Consolidated Totals

 

Year Ended December 31, 2006

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Product revenue

 

$

 

$

7,667

 

$

 

$

 

$

7,667

 

Funded research and development revenue

 

 

489

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

489

 

Research and product development expenses

 

 

11,588

 

 

1,333

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12,921

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

 

 

2,733

 

 

2,457

 

 

4,882

 

 

 

 

10,072

 

Gain on securities available for sale

 

 

4,289

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,289

 

Segment (loss) profit from continuing operations before income taxes, equity in holdings’ losses and minority interests

 

 

(12,847

)

 

662

 

 

(795

)

 

 

 

(12,980

)

Segment (loss) profit

 

 

(12,847

)

 

662

 

 

(2,690

)

 

1,208

 

 

(13,667

)

Total assets

 

 

15,565

 

 

2,782

 

 

15,464

 

 

 

 

33,811

 

Securities available for sale

 

 

10,075

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10,075

 

Capital expenditures

 

 

1,284

 

 

200

 

 

90

 

 

 

 

1,574

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

604

 

 

94

 

 

403

 

 

 

 

1,101

 

MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in thousands)

Test and

 

New Energy

 

Test and Measurement Instrumentation

 

Other

 

Reconciling Items

 

Consolidated Totals

 

Measurement

Reconciling

Consolidated

New Energy

Instrumentation

Other

Items

Totals

Year Ended December 31, 2003

Year Ended December 31, 2007

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Product revenue

$ -

$ 5,547

$ -

$ 5,547

 

$

 

$

9,028

 

$

 

$

 

$

9,028

 

Funded research and development revenue

2,311

-

-

2,311

 

 

1,556

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,556

 

Research and product development expenses

7,283

1,065

-

8,348

 

 

10,115

 

 

1,650

 

 

 

 

 

 

11,765

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

2,195

1,563

2,079

-

5,837

 

 

1,921

 

 

2,650

 

 

4,167

 

 

 

 

8,738

 

Impairment losses

(418)

-

-

(418)

Segment (loss) profit from continuing

operations before income taxes, equity in

holdings' losses and minority interests

(309)

354

(1,776)

-

(1,731)

Gain on securities available for sale

 

 

2,549

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,549

 

Segment (loss) profit from continuing operations before income taxes, equity in holdings’ losses and minority interests

 

 

(11,189

)

 

789

 

 

2,791

 

 

 

 

(7,609

)

Segment (loss) profit

(309)

354

(1,094)

490

(559)

 

 

(11,189

)

 

789

 

 

243

 

 

582

 

 

(9,575

)

Total assets

52,875

1,926

11,037

-

65,838

 

 

8,128

 

 

3,018

 

 

7,570

 

 

 

 

18,716

 

Securities available for sale

44,031

-

-

44,031

 

 

4,492

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,492

 

Capital expenditures

544

43

483

-

1,070

 

 

212

 

 

177

 

 

25

 

 

 

 

414

 

Depreciation and amortization

282

101

216

-

599

 

 

715

 

 

117

 

 

297

 

 

 

 

1,129

 

 

The following table presents the details of "Other"“Other” segment (loss) profit for each of the years ended December 31:

(Dollars in thousands)

2005

2004

2003

Corporate and other (expenses) income:

Depreciation and amortization

$ (608)

$ (402)

$ (216)

Interest expense

-

-

(7)

Interest income

309

37

105

Income tax (expense) benefit

(1,587)

3,564

661

Other expense, net

(868)

(1,316)

(1,658)

Income from discontinued operations

-

-

21

Total (expense) income

$(2,754)

$1,883

$(1,094)

(Dollars in thousands)

 

2005

 

2006

 

2007

 

Corporate and other (expenses) income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

$

(608

)

$

(403

)

$

(297

)

Interest income

 

 

309

 

 

486

 

 

413

 

Gain on derivatives

 

 

 

 

182

 

 

2,967

 

Income tax (expense) benefit

 

 

(1,587

)

 

(1,895

)

 

(2,548

)

Other expense, net

 

 

(868

)

 

(1,060)

 

 

(292)

 

Total (expense) income

 

$

(2,754

)

$

(2,690

)

$

243

 

 

20. Cash Flows - Supplemental Information

 

Year Ended

Year Ended

Year Ended

 

Dec. 31,

Dec. 31,

Dec. 31,

(Dollars in thousands)

2005

2004

2003

Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities:

   

Additional paid-in-capital resulting from stock option exercises

   

treated differently for financial reporting and tax purposes

$ -

$ 294

$ 223

Change in investment and paid-in-capital resulting from

   

other investors' activity in MTI Micro stock

(100)

344

881

Prepaid material in exchange for investment in subsidiary

-

-

3

Derivative tax asset

-

696

-

Cash Payments:

   

Interest

$ -

$ -

$ 7

Taxes paid (tax refunds), net

37

(143)

25

19.

Restructuring

 

In March 2007, the Company announced the suspension of MTI Micro’s high power direct methanol fuel cell program in response to decreased funding and sales opportunities in the military market. In connection with this action, the Company accrued restructuring charges of $344 thousand pre-tax, consisting primarily of cash-based employee severance and benefit costs related to the reduction of 23 positions within its new energy segment and Corporate staff. Restructuring expenses were classified as selling, general and administrative expenses within the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations for the period. As of December 31, 2007, all employees participating in this reduction in force had been terminated. For the year ended December 31, 2007, the Company paid $330 thousand in employee severance, benefits and job placement assistance costs. The remaining accrual at December 31, 2007 was $10 thousand, reflecting a $3 thousand reduction in estimated remaining liability from the Company’s original restructuring accrual due to benefit elections made by employees participating in this action. This remaining liability is expected to be paid by the end of the first quarter of 2008.

F-34

 

 

F-37

MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

21. Gillette Strategic Alliance and Issuance of Stock by Subsidiary

On September 19, 2003, MTI Micro entered into a Strategic Alliance Agreement with Gillette whereby MTI Micro, Gillette and Gillette's Duracell business unit will seek to jointly develop and commercialize micro fuel cell products to power low-power, hand-held, mass market, high volume, portable consumer devices.

The agreement provides for a multi-year exclusive relationship for the design, development and commercialization of a low power direct methanol micro fuel cell power system and a compatible fuel refill system. Pursuant to the agreement, MTI Micro will focus on the development of the DMFC and Gillette will focus on the development of the fuel refill. In addition, both MTI Micro and Gillette transferred and licensed from each other certain IP assets, and both have the ability to earn royalties. This exchange has been accounted for as a nonmonetary transaction with no assets and no gains or losses being recorded as a result of the exchange.

Gillette purchased 1,088,278 (362,760 shares post 2004 1 for 3 reverse split) shares of MTI Micro common stock at a price of $.92 ($2.76 per share post 2004 1 for 3 reverse split) per share for $1 million pursuant to an Investment Agreement. In addition to the foregoing referenced $1 million investment in MTI Micro common stock, Gillette may make additional investments of up to $4 million subject to agreed milestones. The Company has agreed to invest $20 million in MTI Micro during the first two years of the agreement if other sources of funding are not available. Immediately prior to the Gillette transaction closing, the Company invested $11 million ($7.4 million in cash and $3.6 million through the conversion of a loan receivable to equity), of its $20 million commitment in MTI Micro common stock and on October 29, 2003, Jeong Kim, a member of the board of directors of MTI Micro, purchased 1,088,278 (362,760 shares post 2004 1 for 3 reverse split) shares of MTI Micro common stock at a price of $.92 ($2.76 per share post 2004 1 for 3 reverse split) per share for $1 million and on April 7, 2004, the Company also invested $15 million into MTI Micro fulfilling its guaranty obligation.

On August 18, 2004, MTI Micro entered into an amendment to the strategic alliance agreement with Gillette. The amendment to the agreement clarified the allocation of deliverables in milestones 3 and 4; added an additional milestone; and changed the due dates for MTI Micro's and Gillette's deliverables. MTI Micro also granted a non-exclusive license to Gillette to any improvements by MTI Micro to IP developed by Gillette.

On June 20, 2005, MTI Micro entered into the second amendment to the multi-year strategic alliance agreement. The Amendment amended the Strategic Alliance Agreement, dated September 19, 2003, between Gillette and MTI Micro, as amended by Amendment No. 1 to the Strategic Alliance Agreement, to product identification, suitability and OEM validation. The Amendment also added an additional termination right, exercisable by either party, relating to such milestone.

22. Subsequent Events

Sale of Securities Available for Sale

From January 1 through March 13, 2006, the Company sold available for sale securities as follows:

(Dollars in thousands)

  
 

Number of

Proceeds

Company

Shares Sold

from Sales

   

Plug Power

303,500

$1,805

Lease Termination

MTI Micro entered into a Lease Termination Agreement in connection with certain premises at 750 University Avenue, Suite 270, Los Gatos, CA with 750 University, LLC. The Lease Termination Agreement was fully executed on February 9, 2006 with a lease termination effective date of January 31, 2006. The Company accrued $25 thousand in connection with this termination obligation.

Contracts

In January 2006, MTI Micro was notified by the U.S. Department of Energy ("DOE") that due to a reduction in funding levels to the Hydrogen, Fuel Cells & Infrastructure Technologies Program, MTI Micro will not receive its proportion of funding in 2006 for the $6.14 million, three-year, cost-shared development contract awarded to MTI Micro on August, 1st, 2004. Under this contract with MTI Micro, DOE has only authorized $1.17 million or $2.35 million of spending on a cost-shared basis.  Since the U.S. Congress has not appropriated funding for FY2007, we cannot determine at this time if funding for 2007 will be committed to this contract. 

F-38