0000066756 ale:PointinTimeMember ale:U.S.WaterServicesMember 2017-01-01 2017-12-31




United States
Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K
(Mark One) 
 TAnnual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the year ended December 31, 2019
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016
 
£Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
  For the transition period from ______________ to ______________

Commission File Number 1-3548
ALLETE, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Minnesota 41-0418150
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

30 West Superior Street, Duluth, Minnesota55802-2093
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
(218) (218) 279-5000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each classTrading SymbolName of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, without par valueALENew York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.     Yesx     No ¨

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨Nox

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.     Yesx     No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).     Yesx     No ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company” and “smaller reporting“emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.     (Check one):     
Large Accelerated FilerxAccelerated Filer    ¨
Non-Accelerated Filer    ¨Smaller Reporting Company    ¨

Emerging Growth Company    
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).     Yes ¨     No x

The aggregate market value of voting stock held by nonaffiliates on June 30, 201628, 2019, was $3,178,250,707.$4,285,299,935.

As of February 1, 20172020, there were 50,049,02051,696,497 shares of ALLETE Common Stock, without par value, outstanding.

Documents Incorporated By Reference
Portions of the Proxy Statement for the 20172020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated by reference in Part III.







Index
  
  
Item 1.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Item 1A.
Item 1B.
Item 2.
Item 3.
Item 4.
Part II
Item 5.
Item 6.
Item 7.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Item 7A.
Item 8.
Item 9.





Index (Continued)
Item 9A.
Item 9B.
Part III
Item 10.
Item 11.
Item 12.
Item 13.
Item 14.
Part IV  
Item 15.
Item 16.
 
 






Definitions


The following abbreviations or acronyms are used in the text. References in this report to “we,” “us” and “our” are to ALLETE, Inc. and its subsidiaries, collectively.
Abbreviation or AcronymTerm
AFUDCAllowance for Funds Used During Construction - the cost of both debt and equity funds used to finance utility plant additions during construction periods
ALLETEALLETE, Inc.
ALLETE Clean EnergyALLETE Clean Energy, Inc. and its subsidiaries
ALLETE PropertiesALLETE Properties, LLC and its subsidiaries
ALLETE South WindALLETE South Wind, LLC
ALLETE Transmission HoldingsALLETE Transmission Holdings, Inc.
ArcelorMittalArcelorMittal USA, Inc.
ATCAmerican Transmission Company LLC
BasinBasin Electric Power Cooperative
BisonBison Wind Energy Center
BNI EnergyBNI Energy, Inc. and its subsidiary
BoswellBoswell Energy Center
Camp RipleyCamp Ripley Solar Array
CliffsCIPCliffs Natural Resources Inc.Conservation Improvement Program
CO2
Cliffs
Carbon DioxideCleveland-Cliffs Inc.
CompanyALLETE, Inc. and its subsidiaries
CSAPRCross-State Air Pollution Rule
DCDirect Current
EISEnvironmental Impact Statement
EPAUnited States Environmental Protection Agency
ESOPEmployee Stock Ownership Plan
FASBFinancial Accounting Standards Board
FERCFederal Energy Regulatory Commission
Form 8-KALLETE Current Report on Form 8-K
Form 10-KALLETE Annual Report on Form 10-K
Form 10-QALLETE Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
GAAPGenerally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States of America
GHGGreenhouse Gases
GNTLGreat Northern Transmission Line
IBEWInternational Brotherhood of Electrical Workers
Invest DirectALLETE’s Direct Stock Purchase and Dividend Reinvestment Plan
IRPIntegrated Resource Plan
Item ___Item ___ of this Form 10-K
kVKilovolt(s)
kW / kWhKilowatt(s) / Kilowatt-hour(s)
LaskinLaskin Energy Center
MACTMaximum Achievable Control Technology
MagnetationMagnetation, LLC
Manitoba HydroManitoba Hydro-Electric Board
MATSMercury and Air Toxics Standards
MBtuMillion British thermal units
Mesabi MetallicsMesabi Metallics Company LLC (formerly Essar Steel Minnesota LLC)


Definitions (continued)

Abbreviation or AcronymTerm
Minnesota PowerAn operating division of ALLETE, Inc.
Minnkota PowerMinnkota Power Cooperative, Inc.
MISOMidcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
Montana-Dakota UtilitiesMontana-Dakota Utilities Co., a divisionsubsidiary of MDU Resources Group, Inc.
Moody’sMoody’s Investors Service, Inc.


Definitions (continued)
Abbreviation or AcronymTerm
MPCAMinnesota Pollution Control Agency
MPUCMinnesota Public Utilities Commission
MW / MWhMegawatt(s) / Megawatt-hour(s)
NAAQSNational Ambient Air Quality Standards
NDPSCNorth Dakota Public Service Commission
NERCNorth American Electric Reliability Corporation
Nobles 2Nobles 2 Power Partners, LLC
NOLNet Operating Loss
Non-residentialRetail and non-retail commercial, office, industrial, warehouse, storage and institutional
NO2
Nitrogen Dioxide
NOX
Nitrogen Oxides
Northern States PowerNorthern States Power Company, a subsidiary of Xcel Energy Inc.
Northshore MiningNorthshore Mining Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Cliffs
Note ___Note ___ to the consolidated financial statements in this Form 10-K
NPDESNTECNational Pollutant Discharge Elimination SystemNemadji Trail Energy Center
NYSENew York Stock Exchange
Oliver Wind IOliver Wind I Energy Center
Oliver Wind IIOliver Wind II Energy Center
Palm Coast Park DistrictPalm Coast Park Community Development District in Florida
PolyMetPolyMet Mining Corp.
PPA / PSAPower Purchase Agreement / Power Sales Agreement
PPACAPatient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010
PSCWPublic Service Commission of Wisconsin
RSOPRetirement Savings and Stock Ownership Plan
SECSecurities and Exchange Commission
Shell EnergyS&PShell Energy North America (US), L.P.S&P Global Ratings
Silver Bay PowerSilver Bay Power Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Cliffs
SIPState Implementation Plan
SO2
Sulfur Dioxide
Square ButteSquare Butte Electric Cooperative, a North Dakota cooperative corporation
Standard & Poor’sStandard & Poor’s Ratings Services
SWL&PSuperior Water, Light and Power Company
Taconite HarborTaconite Harbor Energy Center
Taconite RidgeTaconite Ridge Energy Center
ThomsonTenaskaThomsonTenaska Energy, CenterInc. and Tenaska Energy Holdings, LLC
TCJATax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (Public Law 115-97)
Tonka WaterTonka Equipment Company
Town Center DistrictTown Center at Palm Coast Community Development District in Florida
TransAltaTransAlta Energy Marketing (U.S.) Inc.
United TaconiteUnited Taconite LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Cliffs
UPM BlandinUPM, Blandin paper mill owned by UPM-Kymmene Corporation
U.S.United States of America
U.S. Water ServicesU.S. Water Services, Holding CompanyInc. and its subsidiaries
USS CorporationUnited States Steel Corporation
WTGWind Turbine Generator




Forward-Looking Statements


Statements in this report that are not statements of historical facts are considered “forward-looking” and, accordingly, involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed. Although such forward-looking statements have been made in good faith and are based on reasonable assumptions, there can be no assurance that the expected results will be achieved. Any statements that express, or involve discussions as to, future expectations, risks, beliefs, plans, objectives, assumptions, events, uncertainties, financial performance, or growth strategies (often, but not always, through the use of words or phrases such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “projects,” “likely,” “will continue,” “could,” “may,” “potential,” “target,” “outlook” or words of similar meaning) are not statements of historical facts and may be forward-looking.


In connection with the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, we are providing this cautionary statement to identify important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those indicated in forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of ALLETE in this Form 10-K, in presentations, on our website, in response to questions or otherwise. These statements are qualified in their entirety by reference to, and are accompanied by, the following important factors, in addition to any assumptions and other factors referred to specifically in connection with such forward-looking statements that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those indicated in the forward-looking statements:


our ability to successfully implement our strategic objectives;
global and domestic economic conditions affecting us or our customers;
changes in and compliance with laws and regulations;
changes in tax rates or policies or in rates of inflation;
the outcome of legal and administrative proceedings (whether civil or criminal) and settlements;
weather conditions, natural disasters and pandemic diseases;
our ability to access capital markets, bank financing and bank financing;other financing sources;
changes in interest rates and the performance of the financial markets;
project delays or changes in project costs;
changes in operating expenses and capital expenditures and our ability to raise revenues from our customers in regulated rates or sales price increases at our Energy Infrastructure and Related Services businesses;customers;
the impacts of commodity prices on ALLETE and our customers;
our ability to attract and retain qualified, skilled and experienced personnel;
effects of emerging technology;
war, acts of terrorism and cybercybersecurity attacks;
our ability to manage expansion and integrate acquisitions;
population growth rates and demographic patterns;
wholesale power market conditions;
federal and state regulatory and legislative actions that impact regulated utility economics, including our allowed rates of return, capital structure, ability to secure financing, industry and rate structure, acquisition and disposal of assets and facilities, operation and construction of plant facilities and utility infrastructure, recovery of purchased power, capital investments and other expenses, including present or prospective environmental matters;
effects of competition, including competition for retail and wholesale customers;
effects of restructuring initiatives in the electric industry;
the impacts on our Regulated Operations segmentbusinesses of climate change and future regulation to restrict the emissions of greenhouse gases;GHG;
effects of increased deployment of distributed low-carbon electricity generation resources;
the impacts of laws and regulations related to renewable and distributed generation;
pricing, availability and transportation of fuel and other commodities and the ability to recover the costs of such commodities;
our current and potential industrial and municipal customers’ ability to execute announced expansion plans;
real estate market conditions where our legacy Florida real estate investment is located may not improve; and
the success of efforts to realize value from, invest in, and develop new opportunities in, our Energy Infrastructure and Related Services businesses; andopportunities.
factors affecting our Energy Infrastructure and Related Services businesses, including fluctuations in the volume of customer orders, unanticipated cost increases, changes in legislation and regulations impacting the industries in which the customers served operate, the effects of weather, creditworthiness of customers, ability to obtain materials required to perform services, and changing market conditions.




Forward Looking Statements (Continued)


Additional disclosures regarding factors that could cause our results or performance to differ from those anticipated by this report are discussed in Part 1, Item 1A under the heading “Risk Factors” beginning on page 25 of this Form 10-K. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which such statement is made, and we undertake no obligation to update any forward-lookingforward‑looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which that statement is made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. New factors emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for management to predict all of these factors, nor can it assess the impact of each of these factors on the businesses of ALLETE or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement. Readers are urged to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made by ALLETE in this Form 10-K and in other reports filed with the SEC that attempt to identify the risks and uncertainties that may affect ALLETE’s business.







Part I


Item 1. Business


Regulated Operations includes our regulated utilities, Minnesota Power and SWL&P, as well as our investment in ATC, a Wisconsin-based regulated utility that owns and maintains electric transmission assets in partsportions of Wisconsin, Michigan, Minnesota and Illinois. Minnesota Power provides regulated utility electric service in northeastern Minnesota to approximately 145,000 retail customers. Minnesota Power also has 1615 non-affiliated municipal customers in Minnesota. SWL&P is a Wisconsin utility and a wholesale customer of Minnesota Power. SWL&P provides regulated utility electric, natural gas and water service in northwestern Wisconsin to approximately 15,000 electric customers, 13,000 natural gas customers and 10,000 water customers. Our regulated utility operations include retail and wholesale activities under the jurisdiction of state and federal regulatory authorities. (See Note 4. Regulatory Matters.)


ALLETE Clean Energy focuses on developing, acquiring, and operating clean and renewable energy projects. ALLETE Clean Energy currently owns and operates, in fourfive states, approximately 535660 MW of nameplate capacity wind energy generation that is fromcontracted under PSAs underof various durations. In addition, ALLETE Clean Energy constructed and sold a 107currently has approximately 380 MW of wind energy facilityfacilities under construction that it will own and operate with long-term PSAs in 2015. On January 3, 2017,place. ALLETE Clean Energy announced that it will develop anotheralso engages in the development of wind energy facility of upfacilities to 50 MW after securing a 25‑year PSA. The PSA includes an optionoperate under long-term PSAs or for the counterpartysale to purchase the facilityothers upon development completion; construction is expected to begin in 2018.completion.


U.S. Water Services providesprovided integrated water management for industry by combining chemical, equipment, engineering and service for customized solutions to reduce water and energy usage, and improve efficiency. On March 26, 2019, the Company sold U.S. Water Services to a subsidiary of Kurita Water Industries Ltd. pursuant to a stock purchase agreement for approximately $270 million in cash, net of transaction costs and cash retained.


Corporate and Otheris comprised of BNI Energy, our coal mining operations in North Dakota, our investment in Nobles 2, a 49 percent equity interest in the entity that will own and operate a 250 MW wind energy facility in southwestern Minnesota, ALLETE Properties, our legacy Florida real estate investment, other business development and corporate expenditures, unallocated interest expense, a small amount of non-rate base generation, approximately 5,0004,000 acres of land in Minnesota, and earnings on cash and investments.


ALLETE is incorporated under the laws of Minnesota. Our corporate headquarters are in Duluth, Minnesota. Statistical information is presented as of December 31, 2016,2019, unless otherwise indicated. All subsidiaries are wholly-owned unless otherwise specifically indicated. References in this report to “we,” “us” and “our” are to ALLETE and its subsidiaries, collectively.
Year Ended December 312016
2015 (a)

2014
2019
2018
2017
  
Consolidated Operating Revenue – Millions(b)
$1,339.7

$1,486.4

$1,136.8

$1,240.5

$1,498.6

$1,419.3
  
Percentage of Consolidated Operating Revenue  
Regulated Operations75%67%88%84%71%75%
ALLETE Clean Energy(a)6%18%3%5%11%6%
U.S. Water Services(b)10%8%
3%11%11%
Corporate and Other9%7%9%8%7%8%
100%100%100%100%100%100%
(a)Includes the construction and sale of a wind energy facility by ALLETE Clean Energy to Montana-Dakota Utilities for $197.7$81.1 million in 2015.2018.
(b)ALLETE sold U.S. Water Services was acquired in February 2015. (See Note 6. Acquisitions.)the first quarter of 2019.


For a detailed discussion of results of operations and trends, see Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. For business segment information, see Note 1. Operations and Significant Accounting Policies and Note 17.14. Business Segments.








REGULATED OPERATIONS


Electric Sales / Customers
Regulated Utility Kilowatt-hours Sold            
Year Ended December 312016
%2015
%2014
%2019
%2018
%2017
%
Millions            
Retail and Municipal            
Residential1,102
81,113
81,204
91,130
81,140
81,096
7
Commercial1,442
101,462
101,468
101,390
101,426
101,420
10
Industrial6,456
456,635
467,487
547,277
547,261
507,327
50
Municipal816
6833
6864
6672
5798
5799
5
Total Retail and Municipal9,816
6910,043
7011,023
7910,469
7710,625
7310,642
72
Other Power Suppliers4,316
314,310
302,904
213,185
233,953
274,039
28
Total Regulated Utility Kilowatt-hours Sold14,132
10014,353
10013,927
10013,654
10014,578
10014,681
100


Industrial Customers. In 20162019, industrial customers represented 4554 percent of total regulated utility kWh sales. Our industrial customers are primarily in the taconite mining, iron concentrate, paper, pulp and secondary wood products, and pipeline industries.
Industrial Customer Kilowatt-hours Sold            
Year Ended December 312016
%2015
%2014
%2019
%2018
%2017
%
Millions            
Taconite/Iron Concentrate3,906
614,000
604,880
65
Taconite5,039
695,039
694,930
67
Paper, Pulp and Secondary Wood Products1,303
201,456
221,499
201,014
14987
141,104
15
Pipelines and Other Industrial1,247
191,179
181,108
151,224
171,235
171,293
18
Total Industrial Customer Kilowatt-hours Sold6,456
1006,635
1007,487
1007,277
1007,261
1007,327
100


Six taconite facilities served by Minnesota Power makemade up approximately 7980 percent of 2018 iron ore pellet capacityproduction in the U.S. according to data from the 2014 Skillings North AmericanMinnesota Department of Revenue 2019 Mining Directory.Tax Guide. Sales to taconite customers and iron concentrate customers represented 3,9065,039 million kWh, or 6169 percent of total industrial customer kWh sales in 2016.2019. Taconite, an iron-bearingiron‑bearing rock of relatively low iron content, is abundantly available in northern Minnesota and an important domestic source of raw material for the steel industry. Taconite processing plants use large quantities of electric power to grind the iron-bearing rock, and agglomerate and pelletize the iron particles into taconite pellets. Iron concentrate reclamation facilities also use large quantities of electricity to extract and process iron-bearing tailings left from previous mining operations to produce iron ore concentrate.


Minnesota Power’s taconite customers are capable of producing up to approximately 41 million tons of taconite pellets annually. Taconite pellets produced in Minnesota are primarily shipped to North American steel making facilities that are part of the integrated steel industry. Steel produced from these North American facilities is used primarily in the manufacture of automobiles, appliances, pipe and tube products for the gas and oil industry, and in the construction industry. Historically, less than five10 percent of Minnesota taconite production ishas been exported outside of North America. Minnesota Power also provides electric service to three iron concentrate facilities capable of producing up to approximately 4 million tons of iron concentrate per year. Iron concentrate is used in the production of taconite pellets. These iron concentrate facilities are owned in whole, or in part, by Magnetation and are not currently operating. (See Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis – Outlook – Industrial Customers and Prospective Additional Load.)



REGULATED OPERATIONS (Continued)
Industrial Customers (Continued)


There has been a general historical correlation between U.S. steel production and Minnesota taconite production. The American Iron and Steel Institute, an association of North American steel producers, reported that U.S. raw steel production operated at approximately 7180 percent of capacity in 2016 (712019 (78 percent in 2015; 772018 and 74 percent in 2014)2017). ManyThe World Steel Association, an association of over 160 steel producers, reducednational and regional steel industry associations, and steel research institutes representing approximately 85 percent of world steel production, in 2015, citing higher levels of imports and lower prices. Some Minnesota taconite and iron concentrate producers reduced production in 2015 in response to declining U.S. steel production. There is a natural lag betweenprojected U.S. steel consumption and Minnesota taconite production. The high level of imports and lower prices in 2015 continued to impact Minnesota taconite production in 2016. In 2015, petitions regarding unfairly traded cold rolled, hot rolled and corrosion-resistant steel products were filed2020 will increase by domestic steel producers with the U.S. Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission resulting in countervailing duty and antidumping investigations. In 2016, the U.S. Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission made final affirmative determinations concluding the investigations. As a result of the affirmative determinations, cash deposits are collected on these products when imported from certain countries. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, 2016 annual imports for consumption of steel products were down approximately 15one percent compared to 2015 annual imports.2019.


REGULATED OPERATIONS (Continued)
Industrial Customers (Continued)

The following table reflects Minnesota Power’s taconite customers’ production levels for the past ten years:
Minnesota Power Taconite Customer Production
Year Tons (Millions) Tons (Millions)
2016*
 28
2019* 37
2018 39
2017 38
2016 28
2015 31 31
2014 39 39
2013 37 37
2012 39 39
2011 39 39
2010 35 35
2009 17
2008 39
2007 38
Source: Minnesota Department of Revenue 2016 Mining Tax Guide for years 2007 - 2015.
Source: Minnesota Department of Revenue 2019 Mining Tax Guide for years 2010 - 2018.Source: Minnesota Department of Revenue 2019 Mining Tax Guide for years 2010 - 2018.
* Preliminary data from the Minnesota Department of Revenue.


Minnesota Power’s taconite customers may experience annual variations in production levels due to such factors as economic conditions, short-term demand changes or maintenance outages. We estimate that a one million ton change in Minnesota Power’s taconite customers’ production would impact our annual earnings per share by approximately $0.03,$0.04, net of expected power marketing sales at current prices. Changes in wholesale electric prices or customer contractual demand nominations could impact this estimate. Minnesota Power proactively sells power in the wholesale power markets that is temporarily not required by industrial customers to optimize the value of its generating facilities. Long-term reductions in taconite production or a permanent shut down of a taconite customer may lead Minnesota Power to file a general rate case to recover lost revenue.


In addition to serving the taconite industry, Minnesota Power serves a number of customers in the paper, pulp and secondary wood products industry, which represented 1,3031,014 million kWh, or 2014 percent of total industrial customer kWh sales in 20162019. The four major paper and pulp mills we serve reported operating at, or near, full capacity in 2016. Minnesota Power also has agreements to provide steam for two of its paper and pulp customers for use in the customers’ operations. The four major paper and pulp mills we serve reported operating at similar levels in 2019 compared to 2018.



REGULATED OPERATIONS (Continued)

Large Power Customer Contracts. Minnesota Power has 9eight Large Power Customer contracts, each serving requirements of 10 MW or more of customer load. The customers consist of six taconite facilities two concentrate reclamation facilities and four paper and pulp mills. Certain facilities have common ownership and are served under combined contracts.


Large Power Customer contracts require Minnesota Power to have a certain amount of generating capacity available. In turn, each Large Power Customer is required to pay a minimum monthly demand charge that covers the fixed costs associated with having this capacity available to serve the customer, including a return on common equity. Most contracts allow customers to establish the level of megawatts subject to a demand charge on a four-month basis and require that a portion of their megawatt needs be committed on a take-or-pay basis for at least a portion of the term of the agreement. In addition to the demand charge, each Large Power Customer is billed an energy charge for each kWh used that recovers the variable costs incurred in generating electricity. FourFive of the Large Power Customer contracts have interruptible service which provides a discounted demand rate in exchange for the ability to interrupt the customers during system emergencies. Minnesota Power also provides incremental production service for customer demand levels above the contractual take-or-pay levels. There is no demand charge for this service and energy is priced at an increment above Minnesota Power’s cost. Incremental production service is interruptible.



REGULATED OPERATIONS (Continued)
Large Power Customer Contracts (Continued)

All contracts with Large Power Customers continue past the contract termination date unless the required advance notice of cancellation has been given. The required advance notice of cancellation varies from onetwo to four years. Such contracts minimize the impact on earnings that otherwise would result from significant reductions in kWh sales to such customers. Large Power Customers are required to take all of their purchased electric service requirements from Minnesota Power for the duration of their contracts. The rates and corresponding revenue associated with capacity and energy provided under these contracts are subject to change through the same regulatory process governing all retail electric rates. (See Item 1. Business – Regulated Operations – Regulatory Matters – Electric Rates.Rates.)


Minnesota Power, as permitted by the MPUC, requires its taconite-producing Large Power Customers to pay weekly for electric usage based on monthly energy usage estimates. These customers receive estimated bills based on Minnesota Power’s estimate of the customer’s energy usage, forecasted energy prices and fuel adjustment clause adjustment estimates. Minnesota Power’s taconite‑producing Large Power Customers have generally predictable energy usage on a week-to-week basis and any differences that occur are trued-up the following month.



REGULATED OPERATIONS (Continued)
Large Power Customer Contracts (Continued)


Contract Status for Minnesota Power Large Power Customers
As of February 1, 2017December 31, 2019
CustomerIndustryLocationOwnership
Earliest
Termination Date
ArcelorMittal – Minorca MineTaconiteVirginia, MNArcelorMittal S.A.December 31, 2025
Hibbing Taconite Co. (a)
TaconiteHibbing, MN
62.3% ArcelorMittal S.A.
23.0% Cliffs Natural Resources Inc.
14.7% USS Corporation
JanuaryDecember 31, 20212023
United Taconite and Northshore Mining(b)
TaconiteEveleth, MN and Babbitt, MNCliffs Natural Resources Inc.December 31, 2026
USS Corporation
(USS – Minnesota Ore) (c)(a)(b)
TaconiteMt. Iron, MN and Keewatin, MNUSS CorporationDecember 31, 20212023
Magnetation (d)
Iron ConcentrateColeraine, MN and Bovey, MNERP Iron Ore, LLCDecember 31, 2025
Boise, Inc.(a)PaperInternational Falls, MNPackaging Corporation of AmericaDecember 31, 2023
UPM Blandin Paper Mill (a)
PaperGrand Rapids, MNUPM-Kymmene CorporationJanuaryDecember 31, 20212029
NewPage CorporationVerso Duluth MillPaper and PulpDuluth, MNVerso CorporationDecember 31, 20222024
Sappi Cloquet LLC (a)
Paper and PulpCloquet, MNSappi LimitedJanuaryDecember 31, 20212023
(a)The contract will terminate four years from the date of written notice from either Minnesota Power or the customer. No notice of contract cancellation has been given by either party. Thus, the earliest date of cancellation is JanuaryDecember 31, 2021.2023.
(b)On May 23, 2016, Minnesota Power extended its electric service agreement with Cliffs for 10 years at Cliffs’ United Taconite and Babbitt facilities. The service agreement was approved by the MPUC in an order dated November 9, 2016.
(c)USS Corporation owns both the Minntac Plant in Mountain Iron, MN, and the Keewatin Taconite Plant in Keewatin, MN. On September 30, 2016, Minnesota Power extended its electric service agreement with USS Corporation through 2021. The service agreement was approved by the MPUC in an order dated December 29, 2016.
(d)On January 30, 2017, ERP Iron Ore, LLC purchased substantially all of Magnetation’s assets pursuant to an asset purchase agreement approved by the bankruptcy court. (See Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis – Outlook – Industrial Customers and Prospective Additional Load.)


Residential and Commercial Customers. In 2016,2019, residential and commercial customers represented 18 percent of total regulated utility kWh sales. Minnesota Power provides regulated utility electric service in northeastern Minnesota to approximately 144,000 residential and commercial customers. SWL&P provides regulated electric, natural gas and water service in northwestern Wisconsin to approximately 15,000 electric customers, 13,000 natural gas customers and 10,000 water customers.


Municipal Customers. In 20162019, municipal customers represented 6five percent of total regulated utility kWh sales. Minnesota Power has 16 non-affiliated municipal customers in Minnesota. All of the municipal contracts include a termination clause requiring a three-year notice to terminate.


In April 2015, Minnesota Power amended its formula-basedPower’s wholesale electric salescontracts with 15 non-affiliated municipal customers in Minnesota have termination dates ranging from 2024 through at least 2032, with a majority of contracts effective through at least 2024. (See Note 4. Regulatory Matters.)

The contract with the Nashwauk Public Utilities Commission, extending the term through June 30, 2028. No termination notice may be given prior to June 30, 2025. The electric service agreement with one otheranother municipal customer is effective throughexpired on June 30, 2019. The other municipal customer provided termination notice for its contract on June 30, 2016. Minnesota Power currently provideshistorically provided approximately 29 MW of average monthly demand to this customer. The rates included in these two contracts are set each July 1 based on a cost-based formula methodology, using estimated costs and a rate of return that is equal to Minnesota Power’s authorized rate of return for Minnesota retail customers (currently 10.38 percent). The formula-based rate methodology also provides for a yearly true-up calculation for actual costs incurred.





REGULATED OPERATIONS (Continued)
Municipal Customers (Continued)

In September 2015, Minnesota Power amended its wholesale electric contracts with 14 municipal customers, extending the contract terms through December 31, 2024. No termination notices may be given prior to December 31, 2021. These contracts include fixed capacity charges through 2018; beginning in 2019, the capacity charge will not increase by more than two percent or decrease by more than one percent from the previous year’s capacity charge and will be determined using a cost-based formula methodology. The base energy charge for each year of the contract term will be set each January 1, subject to monthly adjustment, and will also be determined using a cost-based formula methodology.

Other Power Suppliers. The Company also enters into off-system sales with Other Power Suppliers. These sales are sold at market-basedmarket‑based prices into the MISO market on a daily basis or through bilateral agreements of various durations.


Our PSAs are detailed in Note 9. Commitments, Guarantees and Contingencies, with additional disclosure provided in the following paragraphs.

Basin PSA.PSAs. Minnesota Power has an agreement to sell 100 MW of capacity and energy to Basin for a ten‑yearten-year period which expires in April 2020. The capacity charge is based on a fixed monthly schedule with a minimum annual escalation provision. The energy charge is based on a fixed monthly schedule and provides for annual escalation based on the cost of fuel. The agreement also allows Minnesota Power to recover a pro rata share of increased costs related to emissions that occur during the last five years of the contract. In July 2015, Minnesota Power entered into anhas two additional agreementagreements to sell 100 MW of capacity to Basin at fixed rates for a two-year period beginning in June 2016.prices. (See Note 9. Commitments, Guarantees and Contingencies.)


Minnkota Power PSA. Minnesota Power has a PSA with Minnkota Power which commenced in 2014. Under the PSA,where Minnesota Power is selling a portion of its entitlement from Square Butte to Minnkota Power, resulting in Minnkota Power’s net entitlement increasing and Minnesota Power’s net entitlement decreasing until Minnesota Power’s share is eliminated at the end of 2025. Of Minnesota Power’s 50 percent output entitlement, it sold approximately 28 percent to Minnkota Power approximately 28 percent in 20162019 (28 percent in 2015; 23 percent2018 and in 2014)2017). (See Note 11. Commitments, Guarantees and Contingencies.Power Supply – Long-Term Purchased Power.)


Silver Bay Power PSA. On May 23,In 2016, Minnesota Power and Silver Bay Power entered into a long-term PSA through 2031. Silver Bay Power supplies approximately 90 MW of load to Northshore Mining, an affiliate of Silver Bay Power, which hashad previously been served predominately through self-generation by Silver Bay Power. In the yearsStarting in 2016, through 2019, Minnesota Power will supplysupplied Silver Bay Power with at least 50 MW of energy and Silver Bay Power will havehad the option to purchase additional energy from Minnesota Power as it transitionstransitioned away from self-generation. On December 31,In the third quarter of 2019, Silver Bay Power will ceaseceased self-generation and Minnesota Power will supplybegan supplying the entirefull energy requirements for Silver Bay Power.


Seasonality


The operations of our industrial customers, which make up a large portion of our electric sales, are not typically subject to significant seasonal variations. (See Electric Sales / Customers.) As a result, Minnesota Power is generally not subject to significant seasonal fluctuations in electric sales; however, Minnesota Power and SWL&P electric and natural gas sales to other customers may be affected by seasonal differences in weather. In general, peak electric sales occur in the winter and summer months with fewer electric sales in the spring or fall.and fall months. Peak sales of natural gas generally occur in the winter months. Additionally, our regulated utilities have historically generated fewer sales and less revenue when weather conditions are milder in the winter and summer.


Power Supply


In order to meet its customers’ electric requirements, Minnesota Power utilizes a mix of its own generation and purchased power. As of December 31, 2016,2019, Minnesota Power’s generating capability is primarily coal-fired, but also includes approximately 172 MW ofwind energy, hydroelectric, natural gas-fired, and biomass co-fired generation, 120 MW of hydroelectric generation, 522 MW of nameplate capacity wind energy generation and 10 MW of solar generation. Purchased power primarily consists of long-term coal, wind and hydro PPAs as well as market purchases. The following table reflects Minnesota Power’s generating capabilities as of December 31, 2016,2019, and total electrical supply for 2016.2019. Minnesota Power had an annual net peak load of 1,5201,573 MW on December 15, 2016.November 11, 2019.



REGULATED OPERATIONS (Continued)
Power Supply (Continued)
     Year Ended
 UnitYearNet December 31, 2019
Regulated Utility Power SupplyNo.InstalledCapability Generation and Purchases
   MW MWh%
Coal-Fired      
Boswell Energy Center (a)
31973355
   
in Cohasset, MN41980468
(b)  
   823
 4,160,011
29.6
Taconite Harbor Energy Center1195775
   
in Schroeder, MN2195775
   
   150
(c)
Total Coal-Fired  973
 4,160,011
29.6
Biomass Co-Fired / Natural Gas      
Hibbard Renewable Energy Center in Duluth, MN3 & 41949, 195162
 21,846
0.2
Laskin Energy Center in Hoyt Lakes, MN1 & 21953110
 19,454
0.1
Total Biomass Co-Fired / Natural Gas  172
 41,300
0.3
Hydro (d)
      
Group consisting of ten stations in MNMultipleMultiple120
 643,771
4.6
Wind (e)
      
Taconite Ridge Energy Center in Mt. Iron, MNMultiple200825
 46,808
0.3
Bison Wind Energy Center in Oliver and Morton Counties, NDMultiple2010-2014497
 1,571,045
11.2
Total Wind  522
 1,617,853
11.5
Solar      
Camp Ripley Solar Array near Little Falls, MNMultiple201610
 14,069
0.1
Total Generation  1,797
 6,477,004
46.1
       
Long-Term Purchased Power      
Lignite Coal - Square Butte near Center, ND (f)
    1,435,546
10.2
Wind - Oliver County, ND    293,761
2.1
Hydro - Manitoba Hydro in Manitoba, Canada    331,019
2.3
Total Long-Term Purchased Power  

 2,060,326
14.6
Other Purchased Power (g)
    5,521,456
39.3
Total Purchased Power  

 7,581,782
53.9
Total Regulated Utility Power Supply  1,797
 14,058,786
100.0
     Year Ended
 UnitYearNet December 31, 2016
Regulated Utility Power SupplyNo.InstalledCapability Generation and Purchases
   MW MWh%
Coal-Fired      
Boswell Energy Center1195867
(a)  
in Cohasset, MN2196068
(a)  
 31973355
   
 41980468
(b)  
   958
 6,595,920
45.2
Taconite Harbor Energy Center1195775
   
in Schroeder, MN2195775
   
   150
(c)512,716
3.5
Total Coal-Fired  1,108
 7,108,636
48.7
Biomass Co-Fired/Biomass/Natural Gas      
Hibbard Renewable Energy Center in Duluth, MN3 & 41949, 195162
 7,467
0.1
Cloquet Energy Center in Cloquet, MN (d)
52001
 70,017
0.5
Laskin Energy Center in Hoyt Lakes, MN1 & 21953110
 11,433
0.1
Total Biomass Co-Fired/Biomass/Natural Gas  172
 88,917
0.7
Hydro (e)
      
Group consisting of ten stations in MNMultipleMultiple120
 713,340
4.9
Wind (f)
      
Taconite Ridge Energy Center in Mt. Iron, MNMultiple200825
 47,148
0.3
Bison Wind Energy Center in Oliver and Morton Counties, NDMultiple2010-2014497
 1,751,367
12.0
Total Wind  522
 1,798,515
12.3
Solar (g)
      
Camp Ripley Solar Array near Little Falls, MNMultiple201610
 1,720
Total Generation  1,932
 9,711,128
66.6
       
Long-Term Purchased Power      
Lignite Coal - Square Butte near Center, ND (h)
    1,237,966
8.5
Wind - Oliver County, ND    343,048
2.4
Hydro - Manitoba Hydro in Manitoba, Canada    327,212
2.2
Total Long-Term Purchased Power  

 1,908,226
13.1
Other Purchased Power (i)
    2,960,575
20.3
Total Purchased Power  

 4,868,801
33.4
Total Regulated Utility Power Supply  1,932
 14,579,929
100.0
(a)On October 19, 2016, Minnesota Power announced thatretired Boswell Units 1 and 2 will be retired in the fourth quarter of 2018. (See Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Outlook – EnergyForward.)
(b)Boswell Unit 4 net capability shown above reflects Minnesota Power’s ownership percentage of 80 percent. WPPI Energy owns 20 percent of Boswell Unit 4. (See Note 3. Jointly-Owned Facilities and Projects.Assets.)
(c)Taconite Harbor Units 1 and 2 were idled in September 2016. (See Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Outlook – EnergyForward.)
(d)On July 1, 2016, Minnesota Power sold its Cloquet Energy Center Generator No. 5 to Sappi Cloquet LLC.
(e)Hydro consists of 10 stations with 34 generating units.
(f)(e)Taconite Ridge consists of 10 WTGs and Bison consists of 165 WTGs.
(g)Camp Ripley was placed in service in the fourth quarter of 2016.
(h)(f)Minnesota Power has a PSA with Minnkota Power whereby Minnesota Power is selling a portion of its entitlement from Square Butte to Minnkota Power. (See Electric Sales / Customers.)
(i)(g)Includes short-term market purchases in the MISO market and from Other Power Suppliers.



REGULATED OPERATIONS (Continued)
Power Supply (Continued)


Fuel. Minnesota Power purchases low-sulfur, sub-bituminous coal from the Powder River Basin region located in Montana and Wyoming. Coal consumption in 20162019 for electric generation at Minnesota Power’s coal-fired generating stations was 4.22.5 million tons.tons (3.8 million tons in 2018; 3.8 million tons in 2017). As of December 31, 2016,2019, Minnesota Power had coal inventories of 1.40.9 million tons (1.6(0.9 million tons as of December 31, 2015)2018). Minnesota Power’sPower has coal supply agreements have expiration dates through December 2017providing for the purchase of a significant portion of its coal requirements andthrough December 2021 for a portion of its coal requirements.2021. In 2017,2020, Minnesota Power expects to obtain coal under these coal supply agreements and in the spot market. Minnesota Power continues to explore other future coal supply options and believes that adequate supplies of low-sulfur, sub-bituminoussub‑bituminous coal will continue to be available.


Minnesota Power also has coal transportation agreements in place for the delivery of a significant portion of its coal requirements through December 2018.2021. The delivered costs of fuel and related transportation costs for Minnesota Power’s generation are recoverable from Minnesota Power’s utility customers through the fuel adjustment clause.
Coal Delivered to Minnesota Power
Year Ended December 312016
2015
2014
2019
2018
2017
Average Price per Ton
$35.87

$27.00

$26.52

$35.31

$38.89

$36.50
Average Price per MBtu
$1.98

$1.49

$1.47

$1.94

$2.10

$2.01


Long-Term Purchased Power. Minnesota Power has contracts to purchase capacity and energy from various entities, including output from certain coal, wind, hydro and hydrosolar generating facilities.


Our PPAs are detailed in Note 11.9. Commitments, Guarantees and Contingencies, with additional disclosure provided in the following paragraph.


Square Butte PPA. Under the long-term agreementPPA with Square Butte which expires at the end ofthat extends through 2026, Minnesota Power is entitled to 50 percent of the output of Square Butte’s 455-MW455 MW coal-fired generating unit located near Center, North Dakota.unit. (See Note 11.9. Commitments, Guarantees and Contingencies.) BNI Energy suppliesmines and sells lignite coal to Square Butte. This lignite supply is sufficient to provide fuel for the anticipated useful life of the generating unit. Square Butte’s cost of lignite consumed in 20162019 was approximately $1.57$1.88 per MBtu.MBtu ($1.60 per MBtu in 2018; $1.71 per MBtu in 2017). (See Electric Sales / CustomersMinnkota Power PSA.)


Transmission and Distribution


We have electric transmission and distribution lines of 500 kV (8 miles), 345 kV (242 miles), 250 kV (465 miles), 230 kV (761(717 miles), 161 kV (43 miles), 138 kV (190 miles), 115 kV (1,299(1,285 miles) and less than 115 kV (6,308(6,345 miles). We own and operate 165158 substations with a total capacity of 8,3968,875 megavoltamperes. Some of our transmission and distribution lines interconnect with other utilities.


CapX2020. Minnesota Power is a participant in the CapX2020 initiative which represents an effort to ensure electric transmission and distribution reliability in Minnesota and the surrounding region for the future. CapX2020, which consists of electric cooperatives and municipal and investor-owned utilities, including Minnesota’s largest transmission owners, assessed the transmission system and projected growth in customer demand for electricity through 2020. Minnesota Power participated in three CapX2020 projects which were completed and placed in service in 2011, 2012 and 2015. Minnesota Power invested approximately $100 million to complete the three transmission line projects.

Great Northern Transmission Line. As a condition of thea 250 MW long-term PPA entered into with Manitoba Hydro, construction of additional transmission capacity is required. As a result, Minnesota Power and Manitoba Hydro proposed construction ofis constructing the GNTL, an approximately 220-mile220‑mile 500-kV transmission line between Manitoba and Minnesota’s Iron Range that was proposed by Minnesota Power and Manitoba Hydro in order to strengthen the electric grid, enhance regional reliability and promote a greater exchange of sustainable energy.



REGULATED OPERATIONS (Continued)
Transmission and Distribution (Continued)

The GNTL is subject to various federal and state regulatory approvals. In 2013, a certificate of need application was filed with the MPUC which was approved in a June 2015 order. Based on this order, Minnesota Power’s portion of the investments and expenditures for the project are eligible for cost recovery under its existing transmission cost recovery rider and are anticipated to be included in future transmission factor filings. (See Note 4. Regulatory Matters.) In a December 20152016 order, the FERC approved our request to recover on construction work in progress related to the GNTL from Minnesota Power’s wholesale customers. In 2014, Minnesota Power filed a route permit application with the MPUC and a request for a presidential permit to cross the U.S.-Canadian border with the U.S. Department of Energy. In an order dated April 11, 2016, the MPUC approved the route permit which largely follows Minnesota Power’s preferred route, includingfor the international border crossing,GNTL, and on November 16,in 2016, the U.S. Department of Energy issued a presidential permit to cross the U.S.-Canadian border, which was the final major regulatory approval needed before construction in the U.S. can begincould begin. Construction activities commenced in early 2017. Construction is expectedthe first quarter of 2017, and Minnesota Power expects the GNTL to be completed in 2020,complete and in-service by mid-2020. The total project cost in the U.S., including substation work, is estimated to be between $560approximately $700 million, and $710 million.of which Minnesota PowerPower’s portion is expected to have majority ownershipbe approximately $325 million; the difference will be recovered from a subsidiary of the transmission line.

Manitoba Hydro must obtain regulatory and governmental approvals relatedas non-shareholder contributions to capital. Total project costs of $633.3 million have been incurred through December 31, 2019, of which $339.6 million has been recovered from a new transmission line in Canada. In September 2015, Manitoba Hydro submitted the final preferred route and EIS for the transmission line in Canada to the Manitoba Conservation and Water Stewardship for regulatory approval. Constructionsubsidiary of Manitoba Hydro’s hydroelectric generation facility commenced in 2014.Hydro. (See Note 9. Commitments, Guarantees and Contingencies.)




REGULATED OPERATIONS (Continued)

Investment in ATC


Our wholly-owned subsidiary, ALLETE Transmission Holdings, owns approximately 8 percent of ATC, a Wisconsin-based utility that owns and maintains electric transmission assets in partsportions of Wisconsin, Michigan, Minnesota and Illinois. We account for our investment in ATC under the equity method of accounting. As of December 31 2016,2019, our equity investment in ATC was $135.6$141.6 million ($124.5($128.1 million at as of December 31, 2015)2018). (See Note 5. Investment in ATC.Equity Investments.)


On September 28, 2016, the FERC issued an order reducing ATC’s authorized return on equity to 10.32is 9.88 percent, or 10.82 percent including an incentive adder for participation in a regional transmission organization. Prior to this order, ATC had been allowed a return on equity of 12.2 percent which had been impacted by reductions for estimated refunds related to complaints filed with the FERC by several customers located within the MISO service area.

On June 30, 2016, a federal administrative law judge ruled on an additional complaint proposing a further reduction in the base return on equity to 9.70 percent, or 10.2010.38 percent including an incentive adder for participation in a regional transmission organization, subject to approval or adjustment by the FERC. A final decision frombased on a November 2019 FERC order. In this order, the FERC onreduced the administrative law judge’s recommendation is expected in 2017. (See Note 4. Regulatory Matters.) We estimate that for every 50 basis point reduction in ATC’s allowedbase return on equity our equity earnings in ATC would be impacted annuallyfor regional transmission organizations as recommended by approximately $0.5 million after-tax.an administrative law judge with refunds ordered for prior periods. Multiple parties to the complaint have appealed the FERC order.


ATC’s 10-year transmission assessment, which covers the years 20162019 through 2025,2028, identifies a need for between $3.6$2.9 billion and $4.4$3.6 billion in transmission system investments. These investments by ATC, if undertaken, are expected to be funded through a combination of internally generated cash, debt and investor contributions. As opportunities arise, we plan to make additional investments in ATC through general capital calls based upon our pro rata ownership interest in ATC.


ATC and Duke Energy Corporation are partners in a joint venture, Duke-American Transmission Co. (DATC) which builds, owns and operates electric transmission facilities in North America. DATC is subject to the rules and regulations of the FERC, various independent system operators and state regulatory authorities.

During 2016, ATC formed ATC Development LLC, which is a separate entity formed by the investor-owned utility members of ATC to pursue development outside of ATC’s traditional footprint. ATC Development LLC draws upon ATC’s transmission experience to pursue transmission development opportunities. ALLETE has an approximate 9 percent ownership in ATC Development LLC. ATC Development LLC may incur development expenses as it pursues transmission projects; we will recognize our proportional share of these expenses as they occur.
In January 2017, ATC Development LLC and Arizona Electric Power Cooperative formed ATC Southwest to jointly develop transmission projects in Arizona and the southwestern United States. ATC Southwest will benefit electric cooperative members and electric consumers in the Southwest by developing options to help address the demand for an affordable, reliable transmission system.


REGULATED OPERATIONS (Continued)

Properties


Our Regulated Operations businesses own office and service buildings, an energy control center, repair shops, electric plants, transmission facilities and storerooms in various localities in Minnesota, Wisconsin and North Dakota. All of the electric plants are subject to mortgages, which collateralize the outstanding first mortgage bonds of Minnesota Power and SWL&P. Most of the generating plants and substations are located on real property owned by Minnesota Power or SWL&P, subject to the lien of a mortgage, whereas most of the electric lines are located on real property owned by others with appropriate easement rights or necessary permits from governmental authorities. WPPI Energy owns 20 percent of Boswell Unit 4. WPPI Energy has the right to use our transmission line facilities to transport its share of Boswell generation. (See Note 3. Jointly-Owned Facilities and Projects.Assets.)


Regulatory Matters


We are subject to the jurisdiction of various regulatory authorities and other organizations.


Electric Rates. All rates and contract terms in our Regulated Operations are subject to approval by applicable regulatory authorities. Minnesota Power and SWL&P design their retail electric service rates based on cost of service studies under which allocations are made to the various classes of customers as approved by the MPUC or the PSCW. Nearly all retail sales include billing adjustment clauses, which may adjust electric service rates for changes in the cost of fuel and purchased energy, recovery of current and deferred conservation improvement programexpenditures and recovery of certain transmission, renewable and environmental investments.


Minnesota Public Utilities Commission. The MPUC has regulatory authority over Minnesota Power’s retail service area in Minnesota, retail rates, retail services, capital structure, issuance of securities and other matters. Minnesota Power’s current retail rates are based on a 2011March 2018 MPUC retail rate order that allows for a 10.389.25 percent return on common equity and a 54.2953.81 percent equity ratio. As authorized by the MPUC, Minnesota Power also recognizes revenue under cost recovery riders for transmission, renewable and environmental investments.


20162020 Minnesota General Rate Case. On November 2, 2016,1, 2019, Minnesota Power filed a retail rate increase request with the MPUC seeking an average increase of approximately 910.6 percent for retail customers. The rate filing seeks a return on equity of 10.2510.05 percent and a 53.853.81 percent equity ratio. On an annualized basis, the requested final rate increase would generate approximately $55$66 million in additional revenue. On December 12, 2016, due to a change in its electric sales forecast, Minnesota Power filed a request to modify its original interim rate proposal reducing its requested interim rate increase to $34.7 million from the original request of approximately $49 million; Minnesota Power will file to update its final retail rate increase request by February 28, 2017, and expects the final retail rate increase request to decrease similar to the interim rate proposal. In orders dated December 30, 2016,23, 2019, the MPUC accepted the filing as complete and authorized an annual interim rate increase of $34.7$36.1 million beginning January 1, 2017. As part of this rate increase request, we are seeking an extension of the recovery period for Boswell to better reflect recent environmental investments at the facility and mitigate rate increases for our customers. If approved, annual depreciation expense will be reduced by approximately $25 million. If the requested recovery period extension is not approved, we would expect final rates to be increased by a similar amount. We cannot predict the level of final rates that may be authorized by the MPUC.2020.


Additional regulatory proceedings pending with the MPUC are detailed in Note 4. Regulatory Matters.



REGULATED OPERATIONS (Continued)
Regulatory Matters (Continued)

Public Service Commission of Wisconsin. The PSCW has regulatory authority over SWL&P’s retail sales of electricity, natural gas and water, issuances of securities and other matters. SWL&P’s current retail rates are based on a December 2018 order that allows for a return on equity of 10.4 percent and a 55.0 percent equity ratio. SWL&P anticipates filing a general rate case in the second quarter of 2020.

North Dakota Public Service Commission. The NDPSC has jurisdiction over site and route permitting of generation and transmission facilities in North Dakota.

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. The FERC has jurisdiction over the licensing of hydroelectric projects, the establishment of rates and charges for transmission of electricity in interstate commerce, and electricity sold at wholesale (including the rates for Minnesota Power’s municipal and wholesale customers), natural gas transportation, certain accounting and record-keepingrecord‑keeping practices, certain activities of our regulated utilities and the operations of ATC. FERC jurisdiction also includes enforcement of NERC mandatory electric reliability standards. Violations of FERC rules are subject to enforcement action by the FERC including financial penalties up to $1 million per day per violation. Regulatory proceedings pending with the FERC are detailed in Note 4. Regulatory Matters.

Public Service Commission of Wisconsin. The PSCW has regulatory authority over SWL&P’s retail sales of electricity, natural gas and water, issuances of securities and other matters. SWL&P’s current retail rates are based on a 2012 PSCW retail rate order that allows for a 10.9 percent return on common equity.



REGULATED OPERATIONS (Continued)
Regulatory Matters (Continued)

2016 Wisconsin General Rate Case.On June 28, 2016, SWL&P filed a rate increase request with the PSCW requesting an average overall increase of 3.1 percent for retail customers (a 3.5 percent increase in electric rates, a 1.3 percent decrease in natural gas rates and a 7.8 percent increase in water rates). The rate filing seeks an overall return on equity of 10.9 percent and a 55 percent equity ratio. On an annualized basis, the requested rate increase would generate approximately $2.7 million in additional revenue. Hearings are expected to be scheduled in the first half of 2017. The Company anticipates new rates will take effect during the second quarter of 2017. We cannot predict the level of rates that may be approved by the PSCW.

North Dakota Public Service Commission. The NDPSC has jurisdiction over site and route permitting of generation and transmission facilities in North Dakota.


Regional Organizations


Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc. Minnesota Power, SWL&P and SWL&PATC are members of MISO, a regional transmission organization. While Minnesota Power and SWL&P retain ownership of their respective transmission assets, their transmission networks are under the regional operational control of MISO. Minnesota Power and SWL&P take and provide transmission service under the MISO open access transmission tariff. In cooperation with stakeholders, MISO continues its efforts to overseemanages the safe, cost-effective delivery of electric power across all or parts of 15 states and the Canadian province of Manitoba which includes nearly 175,000200,000 MW of generating capacity.


North American Electric Reliability Corporation. The NERC has been certified by the FERC as the national electric reliability organization. The NERC ensures the reliability of the North American bulk power system. The NERC oversees eightsix regional entities that establish requirements, approved by the FERC, for reliable operation and maintenance of power generation facilities and transmission systems. Minnesota Power is subject to these reliability requirements and can incur significant penalties for non-compliance.non‑compliance.


Midwest Reliability Organization (MRO).MinnesotaPoweris a member and ATC are members of the MRO, one of the eightsix regional entities overseen by the NERC. The MRO's primary responsibilities are to: ensure compliance with mandatory reliability standards by entities who own, operate or use the interconnected, international bulk power system; conduct assessments of the grid's ability to meet electricity demand in the region; and analyze regional system events.


The MRO region spans the Canadian provinces of Saskatchewan and Manitoba, and all or parts of the states of Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, Michigan, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota and Wisconsin.16 states. The region includes more than 130200 organizations that are involved in the production and delivery of electricity to more than 20 million people.electricity. These organizations include municipal utilities, cooperatives, investor-owned utilities, transmission system operators, a federal power marketing agency, Canadian Crown corporations and independent power producers.


Minnesota Legislation


Renewable Energy. In February 2007, Minnesota enacted a law requiringrequires 25 percent of electric utilities’ applicable retail and municipal energy sales in Minnesota to be from renewable energy sources by 2025. TheMinnesota law also requires Minnesota Power to meet interim milestones of 12 percent by 2012, 17 percent by 2016 andincluding 20 percent by 2020. The law allows the MPUC to modify or delay meeting a milestone if implementation will cause significant ratepayer cost or technical reliability issues. If a utility is not in compliance with a milestone, the MPUC may order the utility to construct facilities, purchase renewable energy or purchase renewable energy credits. Minnesota Power’s 2015 IRP, which was filed with the MPUC in September 2015 and approved with modifications by the MPUC in ana 2016 order, dated July 18, 2016, includesincluded an update on its plans and progress in meeting the Minnesota renewable energy milestones through 2025. (See Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Outlook – EnergyForward.)



REGULATED OPERATIONS (Continued)
Minnesota Legislation (Continued)

Minnesota Power continues to execute its renewable energy strategy through key renewable projects that will ensure it meets the identified state mandate at the lowest cost for customers. Minnesota Power has exceeded the interim milestone requirements to date with approximately 3327 percent of its applicable retail and municipal energy sales supplied by renewable energy sources in 2016.2019.



REGULATED OPERATIONS (Continued)
Minnesota Legislation (Continued)

Minnesota Solar Energy Standard. In 2013, legislation was enacted by the state of Minnesota requiringlaw requires at least 1.5 percent of total retail electric sales, excluding sales to certain customers, to be generated by solar energy by the end of 2020. At least 10 percent of the 1.5 percent mandate must be met by solar energy generated by or procured from solar photovoltaic devices with a nameplate capacity of 2040 kW or less. Minnesota Power has one completed solar projectless and another under development. In August 2015, Minnesota Power filed for MPUC approval of a 10 MW utility scale solar project at the Camp Ripley Minnesota Army National Guard base and training facility near Little Falls, Minnesota. In an order dated February 24, 2016, the MPUC approved the Camp Ripley solar project as eligible to meet the solar energy standard and for current cost recovery, which was subsequently finalized by the MPUC in an order dated December 12, 2016. The Camp Ripley solar project was completed in the fourth quarter of 2016. In September 2015, Minnesota Power filed for MPUC approval of a community solar garden project in northeastern Minnesota, which is comprised of a 1 MW solar array to be owned and operated by a third party with the output purchased bysubscriptions. Minnesota Power and a 40 kW solar array that will be owned and operated by Minnesota Power. In an order dated July 27, 2016, the MPUC approved the community solar garden project and cost recovery, subjectexpects to certain compliance requirements. Minnesota Power believes these projects will meet approximately one-thirdboth parts of the overallsolar mandate. Additionally, on January 19, 2017, the MPUC approved Minnesota Power’s proposal to increase the amount of solar rebates available for customer-sited solar installations and recover costs of the program through Minnesota Power’s renewable cost recovery rider. This proposal to incentivize customer-sited solar installations is expected to meet a portion of the required mandate related to solar photovoltaic devices with a nameplate capacity of 20 kW or less.(See Note 4. Regulatory Matters.)

Energy-Intensive Trade-Exposed (EITE) Customer Rates. The Minnesota Legislature enacted EITE customer ratemaking law in June 2015 which established that it is the energy policy of the state to have competitive rates for certain industries such as mining and forest products. In November 2015, Minnesota Power filed a rate schedule petition with the MPUC for EITE customers and a corresponding rider for EITE cost recovery. The rate proposal was revenue and cash flow neutral to Minnesota Power. In an order dated March 23, 2016, the MPUC dismissed the petition without prejudice, providing Minnesota Power the option to refile the petition with additional information or file a new petition. On June 30, 2016, Minnesota Power filed a revised EITE petition with the MPUC which included additional information on the net benefits analysis, limits on eligible customers and term lengths for the EITE discount. In an order dated December 21, 2016, the MPUC approved a reduction in rates for EITE customers and determined that cost recovery will be addressed in a separate proceeding. Minnesota Power provided additional information on cost recovery allocation methods in a December 30, 2016, compliance filing.


Competition


Retail electric energy sales in Minnesota and Wisconsin are made to customers in assigned service territories. As a result, most retail electric customers in Minnesota do not have the ability to choose their electric supplier. Large energy users of 2 MW and above that are located outside of a municipality are allowed to choose a supplier upon MPUC approval. Minnesota Power serves 1210 Large Power facilities over 10 MW, none of which have engaged in a competitive rate process. No other large commercial or small industrial customers in Minnesota Power’s service territory have sought a provider outside Minnesota Power’s service territory since 1994.territory. Retail electric and natural gas customers in Wisconsin do not have the ability to choose their energy supplier. In both states, however, electricity may compete with other forms of energy. Customers may also choose to generate their own electricity, or substitute other forms of energy for their manufacturing processes.


In 2016, 62019, five percent of total regulated utility kWh sales were to municipal customers in Minnesota by contract. These customers have the right to seek an energy supply from any wholesale electric service provider upon contract expiration. In April 2015, Minnesota Power amended its formula-basedPower’s wholesale electric sales contract with the Nashwauk Public Utilities Commission extending the termis effective through June 30, 2028. In September 2015,at least December 31, 2032. Minnesota Power amended its wholesale electric contracts with 14 of its municipal customers extending theare effective through varying dates ranging from 2024 through 2029. The contract terms through December 31, 2024. On June 30, 2016, one of Minnesota Power’swith another municipal customers provided termination notice for its contract effectivecustomer expired on June 30, 2019. Minnesota Power currently provides approximately 29 MW of average monthly demand to this customer. (See Electric Sales / Customers.)


The FERC has continued with its efforts to promote a more competitive wholesale market through open-access electric transmission and other means. As a result, our electric sales to Other Power Suppliers and our purchases to supply our retail and wholesale load are made in thea competitive market.




REGULATED OPERATIONS (Continued)

Franchises


Minnesota Power holds franchises to construct and maintain an electric distribution and transmission system in 91 cities. The remaining cities, villages and towns served by Minnesota Power do not require a franchise to operate. SWL&P serves customers under electric, natural gas and/or water franchises in 1 city and 14 villages or towns.


ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE AND RELATED SERVICES


ALLETE Clean EnergyCLEAN ENERGY


ALLETE Clean Energy focuses on developing, acquiring, and operating clean and renewable energy projects. ALLETE Clean Energy currently owns and operates, in fourfive states, approximately 535660 MW of nameplate capacity wind energy generation that is fromcontracted under PSAs underof various durations. In addition, ALLETE Clean Energy constructed and sold a 107currently has approximately 380 MW of wind energy facilityfacilities under construction that it will own and operate with long-term PSAs in 2015. On January 3, 2017,place. ALLETE Clean Energy announced that it will develop anotheralso engages in the development of wind energy facilityfacilities to operate under long-term PSAs or for sale to others upon completion. (See Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of up to 50 MW after securing a 25‑year PSA. The PSA includes an option for the counterparty to purchase the facility upon development completion; construction is expected to begin in 2018.Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Outlook – ALLETE Clean Energy.)


ALLETE Clean Energy believes the market for renewable energy in North America is robust, driven by several factors including environmental regulation, tax incentives, societal expectations and continual technology advances. State renewable portfolio standards and state or federal regulations to limit GHG emissions are examples of environmental regulation or public policy that we believe will drive renewable energy development.


ALLETE Clean Energy’s strategy includes the safe, reliable, optimal and profitable operation of its existing facilities. This includes a strong safety culture, the continuous pursuit of operational efficiencies at existing facilities and cost controls. ALLETE Clean Energy generally acquires facilities in liquid power markets and its strategy includes the exploration of PSA extensions upon expiration of existing contracts.contracts and production tax credit requalification of existing facilities.


ALLETE CLEAN ENERGY (Continued)

ALLETE Clean Energy will pursue growth through acquisitions or project development for others. ALLETE Clean Energy is targeting acquisitions of existing facilities up to 200 MW each, which have long-term PSAs in place for the facilities’ output. At this time, ALLETE Clean Energy expects acquisitions will be primarily wind or solar facilities in North America. ALLETE Clean Energy is also targeting the development of new facilities up to 200 MW each, which will have long-term PSAs in place for the output or may be sold upon completion. Federal production tax credit qualification is important to development project economics, and ALLETE Clean Energy invested approximately $100 million in equipment in 2016 to meet production tax credit safe harbor provisions.

ALLETE Clean Energy will managemanages risk by having a diverse portfolio of assets, which will includeincludes PSA expiration, technology and geographic diversity. The current operating portfolio of approximately 535660 MW is subject to typical variations in seasonal wind.wind with higher wind resources typically available in the winter months. The majority of its planned maintenance leverages this seasonality and is performed during lower wind periods. The current mix of PSA expiration and geographic location for existing facilities is as follows:
Wind Energy FacilityLocationCapacity MWPSA MWPSA ExpirationRegionCapacity MWPSA MWPSA Expiration
Armenia MountainPennsylvania100.5100%2024East101100%2024
Chanarambie/VikingMinnesota97.5 Midwest98 
PSA 1 12%2018
PSA 1 (a)
 12%2023
PSA 2 88%2023 88%2023
CondonOregon50100%2022West50100%2022
Glen UllinWest106100%2039
Lake BentonMinnesota104100%2028Midwest104100%2028
Storm Lake IIowa108100%2019Midwest108100%2027
Storm Lake IIIowa77 Midwest77 
PSA 1 90%2019 90%2020
PSA 2 10%2032 10%2032
OtherMidwest17100%2028
(a)The PSA expiration assumes the exercise of four one-year renewal options that ALLETE Clean Energy has the sole right to exercise.


ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE AND RELATED SERVICES (Continued)
ALLETE Clean Energy (Continued)


The majority of ALLETE Clean Energy’s wind operations are located on real property owned by others with appropriate easementseasement rights or necessary consents of governmental authorities. TwoOne of ALLETE Clean Energy’s wind energy facilities areis encumbered by liens against theirits assets securing financing. Such financings are structured to be repaid within the term of the existing long‑term PSAs.ALLETE Clean Energy’s Glen Ullin wind energy facility is owned through a tax equity financing structure. (See Note 1. Operations and Significant Accounting Policies.)


U.S. Water ServicesWATER SERVICES


On February 10, 2015, ALLETE acquired U.S. Water Services. U.S. Water Services providesprovided integrated water management for industry by combining chemical, equipment, engineering and service for customized solutions to reduce water and energy usage, and improve efficiency.

On February 8, 2019, the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement providing for the sale of U.S. Water Services is locatedto a subsidiary of Kurita Water Industries Ltd. On March 26, 2019, ALLETE completed the sale, and received approximately $270 million in 49 statescash, net of transaction costs and Canada and has an established basecash retained. The Company recognized a gain on the sale of approximately 4,800 customers. U.S. Water Services differentiates itselfof $13.2 million after-tax in 2019. ALLETE used the proceeds from the competition by developing synergies between established solutions in engineering, equipment and chemical water treatment, and helping customers achieve efficient and sustainable usesale of their water and energy systems. U.S. Water Services is a leading provider to the biofuels industry,reinvest in growth initiatives at our Regulated Operations and also serves the food and beverage, industrial, power generation, and midstream oil and gas industries. U.S. Water Services principally relies upon recurring revenue from a diverse mix of industrial customers. U.S. Water Services sells certain products which are seasonal in nature, with higher demand typically realized in warmer months; generally, lower sales occur in the first quarter of each year. The results for 2015 reflect operations for the date of acquisition, February 10, 2015, through December 31, 2015, and therefore, do not reflect a full twelve months.ALLETE Clean Energy.

Our strategy is to grow U.S. Water Services’ North American presence by adding customers, products and new geographies. We believe water scarcity and a growing emphasis on conservation will continue to drive significant growth in the industrial, commercial and governmental sectors leading to organic revenue growth for U.S. Water Services. U.S. Water Services also expects to pursue periodic strategic tuck-in acquisitions with a purchase price in the $10 million to $50 million range. Priority will be given to acquisitions which expand its geographic reach, add new technology or deepen its capabilities to serve its expanding customer base.

U.S. Water Services leases an office and production facility at its headquarters in Minnesota as well as various office, warehouse and production facilities across the United States.



CORPORATE AND OTHER


BNI Energy


BNI Energy is a supplier of lignite coal in North Dakota, producing approximately 4 million tons annually and has lignite reserves of an estimated 650 million tons.tons of lignite coal reserves. Two electric generating cooperatives, Minnkota Power and Square Butte, presently consume virtually all of BNI Energy’s production of lignite under cost-plus fixed fee coal supply agreements extending through December 31, 2037. (See Item 1. Business – Regulated Operations – Power Supply – Long-Term Purchased Power and Note 11.9. Commitments, Guarantees and Contingencies.) The mining process disturbs and reclaims between 200 and 250 acres per year. Laws require that the reclaimed land be at least as productive as it was prior to mining. As of December 31, 2016,2019, BNI Energy had a $23.5$43.4 million asset reclamation obligation ($22.126.5 million as of December 31, 2015)2018) included in Other Non-Current Liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. These costs are included in the cost-plus fixed fee contract, for which an asset reclamation cost receivable was included in Other Non-Current Assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The asset reclamation obligation is guaranteed by surety bonds and a letter of credit. (See Note 11.9. Commitments, Guarantees and Contingencies.)




CORPORATE AND OTHER (Continued)

Investment in Nobles 2

In December 2018, our wholly-owned subsidiary, ALLETE South Wind, entered into an agreement with Tenaska to purchase a 49 percent equity interest in Nobles 2, the entity that will own and operate a 250 MW wind energy facility in southwestern Minnesota pursuant to a 20-year PPA with Minnesota Power. The wind energy facility will be built in Nobles County, Minnesota and is expected to be completed in late 2020, with an estimated total project cost of approximately $350 million to $400 million. In the fourth quarter of 2019, we entered into a tax equity funding agreement to finance up to $125 million of the project costs. We account for our investment in Nobles 2 under the equity method of accounting. As of December 31, 2019, our equity investment in Nobles 2 was $56.0 million ($33.0 million at December 31, 2018). We expect to invest approximately $115 million in 2020. (See Note 5. Equity Investments.)

ALLETE Properties


ALLETE Properties represents our legacy Florida real estate investment. Market conditions can impact land sales and could result in our inability to cover our cost basis, operating expenses or fixed carrying costs such as community development district assessments and property taxes.



CORPORATE AND OTHER (Continued)
ALLETE Properties (Continued)

ALLETE Properties’ major projectsproject in Florida areis Town Center at Palm Coast and Palm Coast Park.Coast.
Summary of Projects   Residential Non-residential
As of December 31, 2016 
Acres (a)
 
Units (b)
 
Sq. Ft. (b)
Projects      
Town Center at Palm Coast 981
 2,447
 2,210,200
Palm Coast Park 3,137
 3,554
 3,046,800
Total Projects 4,118
 6,001
 5,257,000
Summary of Project   Residential Non-residential
As of December 31, 2019 
Acres (a)
 
Units (b)
 
Sq. Ft. (b)(c)
Project      
Town Center at Palm Coast 807
 1,739
 1,872,700
(a)Acreage amounts areis approximate and shown on a gross basis, including wetlands.
(b)Units and square footage are estimated. Density at build out may differ from these estimates.
(c)Includes retail and non-retail commercial, office, industrial, warehouse, storage and institutional square footage.


In addition to the two projects,Town Center at Palm Coast project, ALLETE Properties has approximately 1,100600 acres of other land available-for-sale.available for sale. (See Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Outlook – Corporate and Other – ALLETE Properties.)


In recent years, market conditions for real estate in Florida have required us to review our land inventories for impairment. In 2015, the Company reevaluated its strategy related to the real estate assets of ALLETE Properties in response to market conditions and transaction activity. The revised strategy incorporated the possibility of a bulk sale of its entire portfolio which, if consummated, would likely result in sales proceeds below the book value of the real estate assets. Proceeds from such a sale would be strategically deployed to support growth in our energy infrastructure and related services businesses. ALLETE Properties also continues to pursue sales of individual parcels over time. ALLETE Properties will continue to maintain key entitlements and infrastructure without making additional investments or acquisitions.

In connection with implementing the revised strategy, management evaluated its impairment analysis for its real estate assets using updated assumptions to determine estimated future net cash flows on an undiscounted basis. Estimated fair values were based upon current market data and pricing for individual parcels. Our impairment analysis incorporates a probability-weighted approach considering the alternative courses of sales noted above.
Based on the results of the 2015 undiscounted cash flow analysis, the undiscounted future net cash flows were not adequate to recover the carrying value of the real estate assets leading to an adjustment of carrying value to estimated fair value. Estimated fair value was derived using Level 3 inputs, including current market interest in the property for a bulk sale of its entire portfolio, and discounted cash flow analysis of estimated selling price for sales over time. As a result, a non-cash impairment charge of $36.3 million was recorded in 2015 to reduce the carrying value of the real estate to its estimated fair value.

In 2016 and 2014, impairment analyses of estimated undiscounted future net cash flows were conducted and indicated that the cash flows were adequate to recover the carrying value of ALLETE Properties real estate assets. As a result, no impairment was recorded in 2016 or 2014.
On September 22, 2016, ALLETE Properties sold its Ormond Crossings project and Lake Swamp wetland mitigation bank for consideration of approximately $21 million. The consideration included a down payment in the form of 0.1 million shares of ALLETE common stock with a value of $8.0 million, with the remaining purchase price to be paid under the terms of a finance receivable due over a five-year period which bears interest at market rates. The finance receivable is collateralized by the property sold.

Seller Financing. ALLETE Properties occasionally provides seller financing to certain qualified buyers. As of December 31, 2016,2019, outstanding finance receivables were $13.9$5.6 million, net of reserves, with maturities through 2021.2024. These finance receivables accrue interest at market-based rates and are collateralized by the financed properties.


Regulation. A substantial portion of our development properties in Florida are subject to federal, state and local regulations, and restrictions that may impose significant costs or limitations on our ability to develop the properties. Much of our property is vacant land and some is located in areas where development may affect the natural habitats of various protected wildlife species or in sensitive environmental areas such as wetlands.


Non-Rate Base Generation and Miscellaneous


Corporate and Other also includes other business development and corporate expenditures, unallocated interest expense, a small amount of non-rate base generation, approximately 5,0004,000 acres of land in Minnesota, and earnings on cash and investments.



CORPORATE AND OTHER (Continued)
Non-Rate Base Generation and Miscellaneous (Continued)

As of December 31, 20162019, non-rate base generationconsists of 29 MW of natural gas and hydro generation at Rapids Energy Center.Center in Grand Rapids, Minnesota. In 20162019, we sold less than 0.1 million MWh of non-rate base generation (0.1 million MWh in 20152018 and in 20142017). Net generation is primarily dedicated to the needs of one customer, UPM Blandin.

Non-Rate Base Power SupplyUnit No.
Year
Installed
Year
Acquired
Net
Capability (MW)
Rapids Energy Center (a)
    
in Grand Rapids, MN    
Steam – Biomass (b)
6 & 71969, 1980200027
Hydro4 & 51917, 194820002
(a)The net generation is primarily dedicated to the needs of one customer.
(b)Rapids Energy Center’s fuel supply is supplemented by coal.





ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS


Our businesses are subject to regulation of environmental matters by various federal, state and local authorities. A number of regulatory changes to the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act and various waste management requirements have recently been promulgated by both the EPA and state authorities.authorities over the past several years. Minnesota Power’s facilities are subject to additional regulationrequirements under many of these regulations. In response to these regulations, Minnesota Power is reshaping its generation portfolio, over time, to reduce its reliance on coal, has installed cost-effective emission control technology, and advocates for sound science and policy during rulemaking implementation.


We consider our businesses to be in substantial compliance with currently applicable environmental regulations and believe all necessary permits to conduct such operations have been obtained. We anticipate that with many state and federal environmental regulations and requirements finalized, or to be finalized in the near future, potential expenditures for future environmental matters may be material and may require significant capital investments. Minnesota Power has evaluated various environmental compliance scenarios using possible outcomes of environmental regulations to project power supply trends and impacts on customers.


We review environmental matters on a quarterly basis. Accruals for environmental matters are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be reasonably estimated based on current law and existing technologies. Accruals are adjusted as assessment and remediation efforts progress, or as additional technical or legal information becomebecomes available. Accruals for environmental liabilities are included in the Consolidated Balance Sheet at undiscounted amounts and exclude claims for recoveries from insurance or other third parties. Costs related to environmental contamination treatment and cleanup are expensed unless recoverable in rates from customers. (See Note 11.9. Commitments, Guarantees and Contingencies.)




EMPLOYEES


As of December 31, 20162019, ALLETE had 1,9631,339 employees, of which 1,9171,316 were full-time.


Minnesota Power and SWL&P have an aggregate of 537465 employees who are members of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) Local 31. The current labor agreements with IBEW Local 31 expire on January 31, 2018.April 30, 2020, for Minnesota Power and February 1, 2021, for SWL&P.


BNI Energy has 174179 employees, of which 129133 are members of IBEW Local 1593. The current labor agreement with IBEW Local 1593 expires on March 31, 2019.2023.




AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION


ALLETE makes its SEC filings, including its annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(e) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, available free of charge on ALLETE’s website, www.allete.com, as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC.







INFORMATION ABOUT OUR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT


As of February 15, 2017,13, 2020, these are the executive officers of ALLETE:
Executive OfficersInitial Effective Date
  
Alan R. Hodnik, Age 5760 
Executive Chairman (a)
February 3, 2020
Chairman and Chief Executive OfficerJanuary 31, 2019
Chairman, President and Chief Executive OfficerMay 10, 2011
Bethany M. Owen, Age 54
President and Chief Executive Officer(a)
May 1, 2010February 3, 2020
PresidentJanuary 31, 2019
Senior Vice President and Chief Legal and Administrative OfficerNovember 26, 2016
  
Robert J. Adams, Age 5457 
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerMarch 4, 2017
Senior Vice President – Energy-Centric Businesses and Chief Risk OfficerNovember 14, 2015
Vice President – Energy-Centric Businesses and Chief Risk OfficerJune 23, 2014
Vice President – Business Development and Chief Risk OfficerMay 13, 2008
Deborah A. Amberg, Age 51
Senior Vice President, Chief Strategy Officer – Regulated Operations and President – SWL&PNovember 26, 2016
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and SecretaryJanuary 1, 2006
  
Patrick L. Cutshall, Age 5154 
Vice President and Corporate TreasurerDecember 18, 2017
TreasurerJanuary 1, 2016
  
Steven Q. DeVinck,Nicole R. Johnson, Age 5745 
Senior Vice President and Chief FinancialAdministrative OfficerMarch 3, 2014
Controller and Vice President – Business SupportDecember 5, 2009
David J. McMillan, Age 55
Senior Vice President – External AffairsJanuary 1, 2012
Senior Vice President – Marketing, Regulatory and Public AffairsJanuary 1, 2006
Executive Vice President – Minnesota PowerJanuary 1, 2006June 28, 2019
  
Steven W. Morris, Age 5558 
Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting OfficerDecember 24, 2016
ControllerMarch 3, 2014
  
Bradley W. Oachs,Margaret A. Thickens, Age 5953 
Senior Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and President – Regulated OperationsCorporate SecretaryNovember 26, 2016February 13, 2019
(a)
On January 30, 2020, the Board of Directors of ALLETE elected Bethany M. Owen Age 51
Senior Vice President andas Chief Legal and AdministrativeExecutive OfficerNovember 26, 2016 of ALLETE effective February 3, 2020, after Alan R. Hodnik informed the Board of Directors on January 30, 2020, that he will retire in May 2021. As part of an orderly transition, Mr. Hodnik will continue as Executive Chairman until May 2021.


All of the executive officers have been employed by us for more than five years in executive or management positions. Prior to election to the position listed above, the following executives held other positions with the Company during the past five years.


Mr. Morris was Director – Accounting.
Mr. Cutshall was Director – Investments and Tax;Tax.
Ms. Johnson was Vice President – Human Resources; Director – Investments.Compensation and Benefits.
Mr. Oachs was Chief Operating Officer – Minnesota Power.
Ms. Owen was Vice President – Information Technology Solutions and President – SWL&P.

Ms. Thickens was General Counsel and Director of Compliance – ALLETE Clean Energy; General Counsel and Secretary – ALLETE Clean Energy; Senior Attorney.
On September 26, 2016, Steven Q. DeVinck announced his retirement from the Company, effective in the spring of 2017. On October 25, 2016, ALLETE announced Robert J. Adams as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, effective March 4, 2017.


EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT (Continued)

On November 21, 2016, the Company named Bradley W. Oachs, as Senior Vice President and President – Regulated Operations, effective November 26, 2016. Since September 12, 2009, Mr. Oachs has held the position of Chief Operating Officer – Minnesota Power. On November 21, 2016, the Company named Bethany M. Owen, as Senior Vice President and Chief Legal and Administrative Officer, effective November 26, 2016. Since June 23, 2014, Ms. Owen has held the position of Vice President – Information Technology Solutions and President – SWL&P. Prior to that she held the positions of Vice President and President – SWL&P from February 2012 through June 2014 and President – SWL&P from August 2010 through February 2012.


There are no family relationships between any of the executive officers. All officers and directors are elected or appointed annually.


The present term of office of the executive officers listed abovein the preceding table extends to the first meeting of our Board of Directors after the next annual meeting of shareholders. Both meetings are scheduled for May 9, 2017.


12, 2020.


Item 1A. Risk Factors


The risks and uncertainties discussed below could materially affect our businessesbusiness operations, financial position, results of operations and cash flows, and should be carefully considered by stakeholders. The risks and uncertainties in this section are not the only ones we face; additional risks and uncertainties that we are not presently aware of, or that we currently consider immaterial, may also affect our business operations, financial position, results of operations and cash flows. Accordingly, the risks described below should be carefully considered together with other information set forth in this report and in future reports that are filedwe file with the SEC.


Entity-wide Risks


We rely on access to financing sources and capital markets. If we do not have access to sufficient capital in the amounts and at the timeson acceptable terms or are unable to obtain capital when needed, our ability to execute our business plans, make capital expenditures or pursue other strategic actions that we may otherwise rely on for future growth couldwould be adversely affected.


We rely on access to financing sources and the capital markets, on acceptable terms and at reasonable costs, as sources of liquidity for capital requirements not satisfied by our cash flowflows from operations. If we are not able to access capital on satisfactory terms, or at all, the ability to maintain our businesses or to implement our business plans may be adversely affected. Market disruptions or a downgrade of our credit ratings may increase the cost of borrowing or adversely affect our ability to access and finance in the capital markets.markets or to access other financing sources. Such disruptions or causes of a downgrade could include but are not limited to: the effects of the TCJA on the Company’s cash flow metrics; a significantloss of, or a reduction in sales to, our taconite, paper and pipeline customers if we are unable to offset the related lost margins; weaker operating performance; adverse regulatory outcomes; disproportionate increase in the contribution to net income from ALLETE Clean Energy and our Corporate and Other businesses as compared to that from our Regulated Operations; deteriorating economic downturn, the financial distress of non-affiliated electric utility companies or financial services companies, a deterioration in capital market conditions,conditions; or volatility in commodity prices.


If we are not able to access capital on acceptable terms in sufficient amounts and when needed, or at all, the ability to maintain our businesses or to implement our business plans would be adversely affected.

A deterioration in general economic conditions may have adverse impacts on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.


If economic conditions deteriorate on a national or regional level, it may have a negative impact on the CompanyCompany’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows as well as on our customers. This impact may include volatility and unpredictability in the demand for the products and services offered by our businesses, the loss of existing customers, tempered growth strategies, customer production cutbacks or customer bankruptcies. It is also possible that anAn uncertain economy could also adversely affect expenses including pension costs, interest costs, and uncollectible accounts, or lead to reductions in the value of certain real estate and other investments.


We may be impacted by neware subject to extensive state orand federal legislation or regulations, and regulation, compliance with which could have an adverse effect on our businesses.


We are subject to, and affected by, extensive state and federal legislation and regulation. We believeIf it was determined that our businesses failed to comply with applicable laws and regulations. If it were determined that they failed to comply,regulations, we could become subject to fines or penalties or be required to implement additional compliance measures or actions, the cost of which could be material. Adoption of new laws, rules, regulations, principles, or practices by federal orand state agencies, or changes to presentor a failure to comply with current laws, rules, regulations, principles, or practices and their interpretations, could have an adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.


Item 1A. Risk Factors (Continued)
Entity-wide Risks (Continued)


The inability to attract and retain a qualified workforce including, but not limited to, executive officers, key employees and employees with specialized skills, could have an adverse effect on our operations.


The success of our business heavily depends on the leadership of our executive officers and key employees to implement our business strategy. The inability to maintain a qualified workforce including, but not limited to, executive officers, key employees and employees with specialized skills, may negatively affect our ability to service our existing or new customers, or successfully manage our business or achieve our business objectives. Personnel costs may increase due to competitive pressures or terms of collective bargaining agreements with union employees.



Item 1A. Risk Factors (Continued)
Entity-wide Risks (Continued)

Market performance and other changes could decrease the value of pension and other postretirement benefit plan assets, which may result in significant additional funding requirements and increased annual expenses.


The performance of the capital markets impacts the values of the assets that are held in trust to satisfy future obligations under our pension and other postretirement benefit plans. We have significant obligations to these plans and the trusts hold significant assets. These assets are subject to market fluctuations and will yield uncertain returns, which may fall below our projected rates of return. A decline in the market value of the pension and other postretirement benefit plan assets would increase the funding requirements under our benefit plans if asset returns do not recover. Additionally, our pension and other postretirement benefit plan liabilities are sensitive to changes in interest rates. As interest rates decrease, the liabilities increase, potentially increasing benefit expense and funding requirements. Our pension and other postretirement benefit plan costs are generally recoverable in our electric rates as allowed by our regulators or through our cost-plus fixed fee coal supply agreements at BNI Energy; however, there is no certainty that regulators will continue to allow recovery of these rising costs in the future.


We are exposed to significant reputationreputational risk.


The Company and its subsidiaries could suffer negative impacts to their reputationsits reputation as a result of operational incidents, violations of corporate compliance policies, regulatory violations, or other events which may result in negative customer perception and increased regulatory oversight, each of which could have an adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.


Catastrophic events, such as natural disasters and acts of war, and natural disasters, may adversely affect our operations.


Catastrophic events such as fires, including wildfires, earthquakes, explosions, and floods, severe weather, such as ice storms, hailstorms, or tornadoes or similar occurrences, as well as acts of war, could adversely affect the Company’s facilities, operations, financial position, results of operations and cash flows. Although the Company has contingency plans and employs crisis management to respond and recover operations in the event of a severe disruption resulting from such events,a catastrophic event, these measures may not be successful. Furthermore, despite these measures, if such an occurrencea catastrophic event were to occur, our financial position, results of operations and cash flows could be adversely affected.


We are vulnerable to acts of terrorism or cybersecurity attacks.


Our operations may be targets of terrorist activities includingor cybersecurity attacks, which could disrupt our ability to produceprovide utility service at our regulated utilities, develop or distribute some portionoperate our renewable energy projects at ALLETE Clean Energy, or operate our other businesses. The impacts may also impair the fulfillment of critical business functions, negatively impact our products. Wereputation, subject us to litigation or increased regulation, or compromise sensitive, confidential and other data.

There have been cybersecurity attacks on U.S. energy infrastructure in the past and there may be such attacks in the future. Our generation, transmission and distribution facilities, information technology systems and other infrastructure facilities and systems could be subject todirect targets of, or otherwise be materially adversely affected by such activities. Hacking, computer viruses, terrorism, theft and sabotage could impact our systems and facilities, or those of third parties on which we rely, which may also disrupt our operations and/or adversely impactour results of operations.

Our businesses require the continued operation of sophisticated custom-developed, purchased, and leased information technology systems and network infrastructure. Ourinfrastructure as well as the collection and retention of personally identifiable information of our customers, shareholders and employees. Although we maintain security measures designed to prevent cybersecurity incidents and protect our information technology and control systems, network infrastructure and other assets, our technology systems, or those of third parties on which we rely, may be vulnerable to disability, failures or unauthorized access due to hacking, viruses, acts of war or terrorism andas well as other causes. If ourthose technology systems were to fail or beare breached and we were unable to recovernot recovered in a timely manner, we may be unable to fulfillperform critical business functions including effectively maintaining certain internal controls over financial reporting, our reputation may be negatively impacted, we may become subject to litigation or increased regulation, and sensitive, confidential and other data could be compromised, whichcompromised. If our business were impacted by terrorist activities or cybersecurity attacks, such impacts could have an adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.





Item 1A. Risk Factors (Continued)
Entity-wide Risks (Continued)


We maintain insurance against some, but not all, of the risks and uncertainties we face.

We maintain insurance against some, but not all, of the risks and uncertainties we face. The occurrence of these risks and uncertainties, if not fully covered by insurance, could have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

Government challenges to our tax positions, as well as tax law changes and the inherent difficulty in quantifying potential tax effects of our operations and business decisions, could adversely affect our results of operations and liquidity.


We are required to make judgments regarding the potential tax effects of various financial transactions and our ongoing operations in order to estimate tax obligations. These judgments include reserves for potential adverse outcomes for tax positions that may be challenged by taxour obligations to taxing authorities. The obligations, which include income taxes and taxes other than income taxes, involvedinvolve complex matters that ultimately could be litigated. We also estimate our ability to use tax benefits, including those in the form of carryforwards and tax credits that are recorded as deferred tax assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. A disallowance of these tax benefits could have an adverse impact on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.


We are currently utilizing, and plan to utilize in the future, our carryforwards and tax credits in the future to reduce our income tax obligations. If we cannot generate enough taxable income in the future to utilize all of our carryforwards and tax credits before they expire, we may incur adverse charges to earnings. If the Internal Revenue Service disagrees with thefederal or state tax authorities deny any deductions resulting from ouror tax planning strategies,credits, our financial position, results of operations and cash flows may be adversely impacted.


Regulated Operations Risks


Our results of operations could be negatively impacted if our Large Power Customerstaconite, paper and pipeline customers experience an economic downturn,incurwork stoppages, fail to compete effectively, in the economy, experience decreased demand, fail to economically obtain raw materials, fail to renew or obtain necessary permits, or experience a decline in prices for their product.


Minnesota Power’s 9eight Large Power Customers accounted for 2228 percent of our 20162019 consolidated operating revenue (22(24 percent in 2015; 312018 and 25 percent in 2014)2017), of which one of these customers accounted for approximately 812 percent of consolidated revenue in 2016 (82019 (10 percent in 2015; 12 percent2018 and in 2014)2017). These customers are involved in cyclical industries that by their nature are adversely impacted by economic downturns and are subject to strong competition in the marketplace. Many of our Large Power Customers also have unionized workforces which put them at risk for work stoppages. Additionally, the North American paper and pulp industry also faces declining demand due to the impact of electronic substitution for print and changing customer needs. As a result, certain paper and pulp customers have reduced their existing operations in recent years and have pursued or are pursuing product changes in response to declining demand.


Accordingly, if our industrial customers experience an economic downturn, incur a work stoppage (including strikes, lock-outs or other events), fail to compete effectively, in the economy, experience decreased demand, fail to economically obtain raw materials, fail to renew or obtain necessary permits, or experience a decline in prices for their product, there could be adverse effects on their operations and, consequently, this could have a negative impact on our results of operations if we are unable to remarket at similar prices the energy that would otherwise have been sold to such Large Power Customers.customers.



Item 1A. Risk Factors (Continued)
Regulated Operations Risks (Continued)

Our utility operations are subject to an extensive legal and regulatory framework under federal and state laws as well as regulations imposed by other organizations that may have a negative impact on our business and results of operations.


We are subject to an extensive legal and regulatory framework imposed under federal and state law including regulations administered by the FERC, MPUC, MPCA, PSCW, NDPSC and EPA as well as regulations administered by other organizations including the NERC. These laws and regulations relate to allowed rates of return, capital structure, financings, rate and cost structure, acquisition and disposal of assets and facilities, construction and operation of generation, transmission and distribution facilities (including the ongoing maintenance and reliable operation of such facilities), recovery of purchased power costs and capital investments, approval of integrated resource plans and present or prospective wholesale and retail competition, renewable portfolio standards that require utilities to obtain specified percentages of electric supply from eligible renewable generation sources, among other things. Energy policy initiatives at the state or federal level could increase renewable portfolio standards or incentives for distributed generation, municipal utility ownership, or local initiatives could introduce generation or distribution requirements that could change the current integrated utility model. Our transmission systems and electric generation facilities are subject to the NERC mandatory reliability standards, including cybersecurity standards. Compliance with these standards may lead to increased operating costs and capital expenditures.expenditures which are subject to regulatory approval for recovery. If it was determined that we were not in compliance with these mandatory reliability standards or other statutes, rules and orders, we could incur substantial monetary penalties and other sanctions, which could adversely affect our results of operations.


These laws and regulations significantly influence our operations and may affect our ability to recover costs from our customers. We are required to have numerous permits, licenses, approvals and certificates from the agencies and other organizations that regulate our business. We believe we have obtained the necessary permits, licenses, approvals and certificates for our existing operations and that our business is conducted in accordance with applicable laws; however, we are unable to predict the impact on our operating results from the future regulatory activities of any of these agencies and other organizations. Changes in regulations, or the adoption of new regulations or the expansion of jurisdiction by these agencies and other organizations could have an adverse impact on our business and results of operations.


Item 1A. Risk Factors (Continued)
Regulated Operations Risks (Continued)


Our ability to obtain rate adjustments to maintain reasonable rates of return depends upon regulatory action under applicable statutes and regulations, and we cannot provide assurance that rate adjustments will be obtained or reasonable authorized rates of return on capital will be earned. Minnesota Power and SWL&P, from time to time, file general rate cases with, or otherwise seek cost recovery authorization from, federal and state regulatory authorities. If Minnesota Power and SWL&P do not receive an adequate amount of rate relief in general rate cases, including if rates are reduced, if increased rates are not approved on a timely basis, if cost recovery is not granted at the requested level, or costs are otherwise unable to be recovered through rates, or if cost recovery is not granted at the requested level, we may experience an adverse impact on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows. We are unable to predict the impact on our business and results of operations from future legislation or regulatory activities of any of these agencies or organizations.


Our regulated operations posepresent certain environmental risks that could adversely affect our financial position and results of operations, including effects of environmental laws and regulations, physical risks associated with climate change and initiatives designed to reduce the impact of GHG emissions.


We are subject to extensive environmental laws and regulations affecting many aspects of our past, present and future operations, including air quality, water quality and usage, waste management, reclamation, hazardous wastes, avian mortality and natural resources. These laws and regulations can result in increased capital expenditures environmental emission allowance trading,and increased operating and other costs as a result of compliance, remediation, containment and monitoring obligations, particularly with regard to laws relating to power plant emissions, coal ash and water discharge and wind energyat generating facilities.


These laws and regulations could restrict the output of some existing facilities, limit the use of some fuels in the production of electricity, require the installation of additional pollution control equipment, require participation in environmental emission allowance trading, and/orand lead to other environmental considerations and costs, which could have an adverse impact on our business, operations and results of operations.


These laws and regulations generally require us to obtain and comply with a wide variety of environmental licenses, permits, inspections and other approvals. BothViolations of these laws and regulations could expose us to regulatory and legal proceedings, disputes with, and legal challenges by, governmental authorities and private parties, may seek to enforce applicable environmental lawsas well as potential significant civil fines criminal penalties and regulations.other sanctions.



Item 1A. Risk Factors (Continued)
Regulated Operations Risks (Continued)

Existing environmental regulations may be revised and new environmental regulations seeking to protect the environment may be adopted or become applicable to us. Revised or additional regulations which result in increased compliance costs or additional operating restrictions, particularly if those costs are not fully recoverable from customers, could have an adverse effect on our results of operations.


The scientific community generally accepts that emissions of GHG are linked to global climate change. Physical risks of climate change, such as more frequent or more extreme weather events, changes in temperature and precipitation patterns, changes to ground and surface water availability, and other related phenomena, could affect some, or all, of our operations. Severe weather or other natural disasters could be destructive, which could result in increased costs. An extreme weather event within our utility service areas can also directly affect our capital assets, causing disruption in service to customers due to downed wires and poles or damage to other operating equipment. These all have the potential to adversely affect our business and operations.

Proposals for voluntary initiatives to reduce GHGs such as CO2, a by-product of burning fossil fuels, have been discussed within Minnesota, among a group of Midwestern states that includes Minnesota and in the United States Congress. In 2013, President Obama announced a Climate Action Plan (CAP) that calls for implementation of measures that reduce GHG emissions in the U.S., emphasizing means such as expanded deployment of renewable energy resources, energy and resource conservation, energy efficiency improvements and a shift to fuel sources that have lower emissions. Certain portions of the CAP directly address electric utility GHG emissions. The implementation of the CAP could have an adverse impact on our results of operations if additional capital expenditures and operating costs are required and if those costs are not fully recovered from customers.

In 2014, the EPA announced a proposed rule under Section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act for existing power plants (CPP). In 2015, the EPA issued the final CPP, together with a proposed federal implementation plan and a model rule for emissions trading. Numerous petitions for review of the rule have been filed with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, and the U.S. Supreme Court has stayed the effectiveness of the rule until after the appellate court process is complete. If upheld, the implementation of the CPP could have an adverse impact on our results of operations if additional capital expenditures and operating costs are required and if those costs are not fully recovered from customers. (See Note 11. Commitments, Guarantees and Contingencies.)


Item 1A. Risk Factors (Continued)
Regulated Operations Risks (Continued)


There is significant uncertainty regarding whetherif and when new laws or regulations will be adopted to reduce GHGsor limit GHG and what affectthe impact any such laws or regulations would have on us. In 2016,2019, coal was the primary fuel source for 7364 percent of the energy produced by our generating facilities. FutureAny future limits on GHG emissions would likelyat the federal or state level, or action taken by regulators, may require us to incur significant increases in capital expenditures and increases in operating costs, which if significant enough,or could result in the closure of certain coal-fired energy centers,generating facilities, an impairment of assets, or otherwise adversely affect our results of operations, particularly if implementationresulting expenditures and costs are not fully recoverable from customers.


We cannot predict the amount or timing of all future expenditures related to environmental matters because of uncertainty as to applicable regulations or requirements. There is also uncertainty in quantifying liabilities under environmental laws that impose joint and several liability on all potentially responsible parties. Violations of certain environmental statutes, rules and regulations could expose ALLETE to third party disputes and potentially significant monetary penalties, as well as other sanctions for non-compliance.non‑compliance.


The operation and maintenance of our regulated electric generation and transmission facilities are subject to operational risks that could adversely affect our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.


The operation of generating facilities involves many risks, including start-up operationsoperational risks, breakdown or failure of facilities, the dependence on a specific fuel source, inadequatefuel supply, availability of fuel transportation, orand the impact of unusual or adverse weather conditions or other natural events, as well as the risk of performance below expected levels of output or efficiency. A significant portion of our facilities were constructed many years ago. In particular,contain older generating equipment, which, even if maintained in accordance with good engineering practices, may require significant capital expenditures to continue operating at peak efficiency. Generation and transmission facilities and equipment are also likely to require periodic upgrades and improvements due to changing environmental standards and technological advances. We could be subject to costs associated with any unexpected failure to produce and/or deliver power, including failure caused by breakdown or forced outage, as well as repairing damage to facilities due to storms, natural disasters, wars, sabotage, terrorist acts and other catastrophic events.


Our ability to successfully and timely complete capital improvements to existing regulated facilities or other capital projects is contingent upon many variables.


We expect to incur significant capital expenditures in making capital improvements to our existing electric generation and transmission facilities and in the development and/orand construction of new electric generation and transmission facilities. Should any such efforts be unsuccessful or not completed in a timely manner, we could be subject to additional costs or impairments which could have an adverse impact on our financial position, and results of operation.operation and cash flows.


Our regulated electric generating operations may not have access to adequate and reliable transmission and distribution facilities necessary to deliver electricity to our customers.


We depend on our own transmission and distribution facilities, as well as facilities owned by other utilities, to deliver the electricity produced and sold to our customers, and to other energy suppliers. If transmission capacity is inadequate, our ability to sell and deliver electricity may be limited. We may have to forgo sales or may have to buy more expensive wholesale electricity that is available in the capacity-constrained area. In addition, any infrastructure failure that interrupts or impairs delivery of electricity to our customers could negatively impact the satisfaction of our customers, which could have an adverse impact on our business and results of operations.



Item 1A. Risk Factors (Continued)
Regulated Operations Risks (Continued)

Our results of operations could be impacted by declining wholesale power prices.


Wholesale prices for electricity have declined in recent years primarily due to low natural gas prices. If there are reductions in demand from customers or if we lose customers, we will market any available power to Other Power Suppliers in an effort to mitigate any earnings impact. Sales to Other Power Suppliers are sold at market-based prices into the MISO market on a daily basis or through bilateral agreements of various durations. Due to the low wholesale prices for electricity, we can make no assurancesdo not expect that our power marketing efforts would fully offset anythe reduction in earnings resulting from the lower demand from existing customers or the loss of customers.


(See Item 1A. Risk Factors (Continued)
1. Business – Regulated Operations Risks (Continued)– Electric Sales / Customers.)


The price of electricity and fuel may be volatile.


Volatility in market prices for electricity and fuel could adversely impact our financial position and results of operations and may result from:


severe or unexpected weather conditions and natural disasters;
seasonality;
changes in electricity usage;
transmission or transportation constraints, inoperability or inefficiencies;
availability of competitively priced alternative energy sources;
changes in supply and demand for energy;
changes in power production capacity;
outages at our generating facilities or those of our competitors;
availability of fuel transportation;
changes in production and storage levels of natural gas, lignite, coal, crude oil and refined products;
wars, sabotage, terrorist acts or other catastrophic events; and
federal, state, local and foreign energy, environmental, or other regulation and legislation.


Fluctuations in our fuel and purchased power costs related to our retail and municipal customers are passed on to customers through the fuel adjustment clause. Volatility in market prices for our fuel and purchase power costs primarily impacts our sales to Other Power Suppliers.


Demand for energy may decrease.


Our results of operations are impacted by the demand for energy in our service territories.territories, our municipal customers and other power suppliers. There could be lower demand for energy due to a loss of customers as a result of economic conditions, customers constructing or installing their own generation facilities, higher costs and rates charged to customers, eligible municipal and other power suppliers choosing an alternative energy provider, or loss of service territory or franchises. Further, the energy conservation and technological advances that increaseincreased energy efficiency may temporarily or permanently reduce the demand for energy products. In addition, therewe are impacted by state and federal regulations requiring mandatory conservation measures, which would reduce the demand for energy.energy products. Continuing technology improvements and regulatory developments may make customer and third party-owned generation technologies such as rooftop solar systems, wind turbines,WTGs, microturbines and battery storage systems more cost effective and feasible for more of our customers. If more customers utilize their own generation, demand for energy from us would decline. There may not be future economic growth opportunities that would enable us to replace the lost energy demand from these customers. Therefore, a decrease in demand for energy could adversely impact our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.


We may not be able to successfully implement our strategic objectives of growing load at our utilities if current or potential industrial or municipal customers are unable to successfully implement expansion plans, including the inability to obtain necessary governmental permits.


As part of our long-term strategy, we pursue new wholesale and retail loads in and around our service territories. Currently, there are several companies in our service territoriesnortheastern Minnesota that are in the process of developing natural resource-based projects that represent long-term growth potential and load diversity for our Regulated Operations businesses. These projects may include construction of new facilities and restarts of old facilities, both of which require permitting and/orand approvals to be obtained before the projects can be successfully implemented. If a project does not obtain any necessary governmental (including environmental) permits and approvals or if these customers are unable to successfully implement expansion plans, our long-term strategy and thus our results of operations could be adversely impacted.




Item 1A. Risk Factors (Continued)


ALLETE Clean Energy Infrastructure/ Corporate and Related ServicesOther Risks


The inability to successfully manage and grow ALLETE Clean Energy and our Corporate and Other businesses could adversely affect our results of operations.

The Company's strategy for ALLETE Clean Energy includes adding customers, new geographies, project development for others and growth through acquisitions. This strategy depends, in part, on the Company’s ability to successfully identify and evaluate acquisition opportunities and consummate acquisitions on acceptable terms. The Company may compete with other companies for these acquisition opportunities, which may increase the Company’s cost of making acquisitions and the Company may be unsuccessful in pursuing these acquisition opportunities. Other companies may be able to pay more for acquisitions and may be able to identify, evaluate, bid for and purchase a greater number of assets than the Company’s financial or human resources permit. Additionally, tax law changes may adversely impact the economic characteristics of potential acquisitions or investments. If the Company is unable to execute its strategy of growth through acquisitions, project development for others, or the addition of new customers and geographies, it may impede our long-term objectives and business strategy.

Acquisitions are subject to uncertainties. If we are unable to successfully integrate and manage future acquisitions or strategic investments, this could have an adverse impact on our results of operations. Our actual results may also differ from our expectations due to factors such as the ability to obtain timely regulatory or governmental approvals, integration and operational issues and the ability to retain management and other key personnel.

The generation of electricity from ALLETE Clean Energy’sour wind energy facilities depends heavily on suitable meteorological conditions.


ALLETE Clean Energy’sAlthough our wind energy facilities are geographically diverse; however, iflocated in diverse geographic regions to reduce the potential impact that may be caused by unfavorable weather in a particular region, suitable meteorological conditions are variable and difficult to predict. If wind conditions are unfavorable ALLETE Clean Energy'sor meteorological conditions are unsuitable, our electricity generation and revenue from its wind energy facilities may be substantially below itsour expectations. The electricity produced, production tax credits received, and revenues generated by a wind energy facility are highly dependent on suitable wind conditions and associated weather conditions, which are variable and beyond ALLETE Clean Energy’sour control. We base our decisions about which wind projects to build or acquire as well as our electricity generation estimates, in part, on the findings of long-term wind and other meteorological studies conducted on the project site and its region; however, the unpredictable nature of wind conditions, weather and meteorological conditions can result in material deviations from these studies and our expectations. Furthermore, components of itsour systems could be damaged by severe weather, such as hailstorms, lightning or tornadoes. In addition, replacement and spare parts for key components of ALLETE Clean Energy’sour diverse turbine portfolio may be difficult or costly to acquire or may be unavailable. Unfavorable wind conditions, weather and atmospheric conditionsor changes to meteorological patterns could impair the effectiveness of ALLETE Clean Energy’sour wind energy facility assets, or reduce their output beneath their rated capacity or require shutdown of key equipment, impeding operation of itsour wind energy facilities.


The construction, operation and maintenance of our electric generation facilities or investment in facilities are subject to operational risks that could adversely affect our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

The construction and operation of generating facilities involves many risks, including the performance by key contracted suppliers and maintenance providers, start-up operations risks, breakdown or failure of facilities, the dependence on the availability of wind resources, or the impact of unusual, adverse weather conditions or other natural events, as well as the risk of performance below expected levels of output or efficiency. Some of our facilities contain older generating equipment, which even if maintained in accordance with good engineering practices, may require significant capital expenditures to continue operating at peak efficiency. We could be subject to costs associated with any unexpected failure to produce and deliver power, including failure caused by breakdown or forced outage, as well as repairing damage to facilities due to storms, natural disasters, wars, sabotage, terrorist acts and other catastrophic events.

As contracts with its counterparties expire, ALLETE Clean Energywe may not be able to replace them with agreements on similar terms.


ALLETE Clean Energy is party to PSAs under various durations which expire in various years between 20182020 and 2032.2039. These PSA expirations are prior to the end of the estimated useful lives of the respective wind energy facilities. If, for any reason, ALLETE Clean Energy is unable to enter into new agreements with existing or new counterparties on similar terms once the current agreements expire, or sell energy in the wholesale market resulting in similar revenue, our financial position, results of operations and cash flows could be adversely affected.affected, which includes potential impairment of property, plant and equipment.



Item 1A. Risk Factors (Continued)
ALLETE Clean Energy / Corporate and Other Risks (Continued)

Counterparties to ALLETE Clean Energy’s offtaketurbine supply, service and maintenance, or power sale agreements may not fulfill their obligations.


ALLETE Clean Energy is party to turbine supply agreements, service and maintenance agreements, and PSAs under various durations with a limited number of creditworthy counterparties. If, for any reason, any of the counterparties under these agreements are unable or unwilling todo not fulfill their related contractual obligations, and ALLETE Clean Energy is unable to mitigate non-performance by a key supplier or maintenance provider or remarket thePSA energy resulting in similar revenue, our financial position, results of operations and cash flows could be adversely affected.

The inability to successfully manage and grow our Energy Infrastructure and Related Services businesses could adversely affect our results of operations.

Our Energy Infrastructure and Related Services businesses consist of ALLETE Clean Energy and U.S. Water Services. The Company's strategy for these businesses includes growth through acquisitions, project development for others, and by adding customers, products, and new geographies. This strategy depends, in part, on the Company’s ability to successfully identify and evaluate acquisition opportunities and consummate acquisitions on acceptable terms. The Company may compete with other companies for these acquisition opportunities, which may increase the Company’s cost of making acquisitions and the Company may be unsuccessful in pursuing these acquisition opportunities. These companies may be able to pay more for acquisitions and may be able to identify, evaluate, bid for and purchase a greater number of assets than the Company’s financial or human resources permit. If the Company is unable to execute its strategy of growth through acquisitions, project development for others, and/or the addition of new customers, products and geographies, it may impede our long-term objectives of achieving average annual earnings per share growth of a minimum of 5 percent and providing a dividend payout competitive with our industry.

Acquisitions are subject to uncertainties. If we are unable to successfully integrate and manage future acquisitions or strategic investments, this could have an adverse impact on our results of operations. Our actual results may also differ from our expectations due to factors such as the ability to obtain timely regulatory or governmental approvals, integration and operational issues and the ability to retain management and other key personnel.

U.S. Water Services principally relies upon recurring revenues from a diverse mix of industrial customers. Some of these customers can be adversely affected by low commodity prices such as those for ethanol and oil which may cause these customers to purchase fewer of U.S. Water Services’ products and services. If U.S. Water Services is unable to retain its existing customers, add new customers, or if it experiences reduced demand for its products and services, adverse impacts on our results of operations could occur that would prevent us from achieving our future growth expectations.



Item 1A. Risk Factors (Continued)
Energy Infrastructure and Related Services Risks (Continued)

ALLETE has a significant amount of goodwill and intangible assets. A determination that goodwill or intangible assets have been impaired could result in a significant non-cash charge to earnings.

We had approximately $213 million of goodwill and intangible assets recorded on our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2016, primarily relating to our acquisition of U.S. Water Services in February 2015. If we make changes in our business strategy or if market or other conditions adversely affect the operations of U.S. Water Services, we may be required to record an impairment charge. Declines in projected operating cash flows at U.S. Water Services could also result in an impairment charge. An impairment charge could have an adverse effect on our results of operations.

Corporate and Other Risks


BNI Energy may be adversely impacted by its exposure to customer concentration, and environmental laws and regulations.


BNI Energy sells lignite coal to two electric generating cooperatives, Minnkota Power and Square Butte, and could be adversely impacted if these customers were unable or unwilling to fulfill their related contractual obligations. In addition, BNI Energy and its customers may be adversely impacted by environmental laws and regulations which could have an adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows. In addition, insurance companies have decreased the available coverage for policy holders in the mining industry, impacting the availability of coverage, and leading to higher deductibles and premiums.


Real estate market conditions where our legacy Florida real estate investment is located may not improve.


The Company’s strategy related to the real estate assets of ALLETE Properties incorporates the possibility of a bulk sale of its entire portfolio, in addition to sales over time. However,time, however, continued adverse market conditions could impact the timing of land sales, which could result in little to no sales, while still incurring operating expenses such as community development district assessments and property taxes, resulting in continued annual net operating losses at ALLETE Properties. Furthermore, weak market conditions could put the properties at risk for an impairment charge. An impairment charge whichwould result in a non-cash charge to earnings that could adversely impacthave an adverse effect on our results of operations.




Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments


None.




Item 2. Properties


A discussion of our properties is included in Item 1. Business and is incorporated by reference herein.




Item 3. Legal Proceedings


Discussions of material regulatory and environmental proceedings are included in Note 4. Regulatory Matters and Note 11.9. Commitments, Guarantees and Contingencies, and are incorporated by reference herein.


We are involved in litigation arising in the normal course of business. Also in the normal course of business, we are involved in tax, regulatory and other governmental audits, inspections, investigations and other proceedings that involve state and federal taxes, safety, and compliance with regulations, rate base and cost of service issues, among other things. We do not expect the outcome of these matters to have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.




Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures


The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act) requires issuers to include in periodic reports filed with the SEC certain information relating to citations or orders for violations of standards under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (Mine Safety Act). Information concerning mine safety violations or other regulatory matters required by Section 1503(a) of the Dodd-Frank Act and this Item are included in Exhibit 95 to this Form 10-K.






Part II


Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities


Our common stock is listed on the NYSE under the symbol ALE. We have paid dividends, without interruption, on our common stock since 1948. A quarterly dividend of $0.535$0.6175 per share on our common stock is payable on March 1, 2017,2020, to the shareholders of record on February 15, 2017.14, 2020. The timing and amount of future dividends will depend upon earnings, cash requirements, the financial condition of the Company, applicable government regulations and other factors deemed relevant by the ALLETE Board of Directors.

The following table shows dividends declared per share, and the high and low prices of our common stock for the periods indicated as reported by the NYSE:
  2016  2015 
 Price RangeDividendsPrice RangeDividends
QuarterHighLowDeclaredHighLowDeclared
First$58.34$48.26
$0.52
$59.73$51.16
$0.505
Second$64.69$53.470.52
$52.98$46.270.505
Third$65.41$52.500.52
$52.49$45.290.505
Fourth$66.92$56.480.52
$52.90$47.930.505
Annual Total  
$2.08
  
$2.02

As of February 1, 2017,2020, there were approximately 23,00021,000 common stock shareholders of record.


Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities (Continued)


Performance Graph.


The following graph compares ALLETE’s cumulative Total Shareholder Return on its common stock with the cumulative return of the S&P 500 Index and the Philadelphia Utility Index. The S&P 500 Index is a capitalization-weighted index of 500 stocks designed to measure performance of the broad domestic economy through changes in the aggregate market value of 500 stocks representing all major industries. Because this composite index has a broad industry base, its performance may not closely track that of a composite index comprised solely of electric utilities. The Philadelphia Utility Index is a capitalization-weighted index of 20 utility companies involved in the generation of electricity.


The calculations assume a $100 investment on December 31, 2011,2014, and reinvestment of dividends.

chart-50a68630a1ad51e0b38.jpg
201120122013201420152016201420152016201720182019
ALLETE$100$102$129$149$143$187$100$96$126$150$158$174
S&P 500 Index$100$116$154$175$177$198$100$101$113$138$132$174
Philadelphia Utility Index$100$99$110$142$151$177$100$94$110$124$129$163







Item 6. Selected Financial Data
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
Millions Except Per Share Amounts  
Operating Revenue (a)(b)

$1,339.7

$1,486.4

$1,136.8

$1,018.4

$961.2

$1,240.5

$1,498.6

$1,419.3

$1,339.7

$1,486.4
Operating Expenses (a)(b)

$1,116.2

$1,275.7

$948.0

$864.3

$806.0

$1,060.7

$1,297.4

$1,193.4

$1,122.7

$1,274.7
Net Income(c)
$155.8

$141.5

$125.5

$104.7

$97.1

$185.5

$174.1

$172.2

$155.8

$141.5
Less: Non-Controlling Interest in Subsidiaries (b)
0.5
0.4
0.7


$(0.1)


$0.5

$0.4
Net Income Attributable to ALLETE(c)
$155.3

$141.1

$124.8

$104.7

$97.1

$185.6

$174.1

$172.2

$155.3

$141.1
Common Stock Dividends102.7
97.9
83.8
75.2
69.1

$121.4

$115.0

$108.7

$102.7

$97.9
Earnings Retained in Business(c)
$52.6

$43.2

$41.0

$29.5

$28.0

$64.2

$59.1

$63.5

$52.6

$43.2
Shares Outstanding  
Year-End49.6
49.1
45.9
41.4
39.4
51.7
51.5
51.1
49.6
49.1
Average (c)
    
Basic49.3
48.3
42.9
39.7
37.6
51.6
51.3
50.8
49.3
48.3
Diluted49.5
48.4
43.1
39.8
37.6
51.7
51.5
51.0
49.5
48.4
Diluted Earnings Per Share(c)
$3.14

$2.92

$2.90

$2.63

$2.58

$3.59

$3.38

$3.38

$3.14

$2.92
Total Assets (d)

$4,906.4

$4,894.5

$4,351.2

$3,468.7

$3,245.9

$5,482.8

$5,165.0

$5,080.0

$4,876.9

$4,864.4
Long-Term Debt (d)

$1,370.4

$1,556.7

$1,263.2

$1,074.9

$926.1

$1,400.9

$1,428.5

$1,439.2

$1,370.4

$1,556.7
Return on Common Equity(c)8.4%8.0%8.6%8.3%8.6%8.4%8.3%8.6%8.4%8.0%
Common Equity Ratio55%53%54%55%54%56%59%58%55%53%
Dividends Declared per Common Share
$2.08

$2.02

$1.96

$1.90

$1.84

$2.35

$2.24

$2.14

$2.08

$2.02
Dividend Payout Ratio(c)66%69%68%72%71%65%66%63%66%69%
Book Value Per Share at Year-End
$38.17

$37.18

$35.04

$32.43

$30.50

$43.19

$41.85

$40.46

$38.17

$37.18
Capital Expenditures by Segment    
Regulated Operations
$121.8

$224.4

$583.5

$326.3

$418.2

$230.9

$211.9

$177.1

$121.8

$224.4
ALLETE Clean Energy106.9
8.6
4.2


385.6
89.7
56.1
106.9
8.6
U.S. Water Services(b)3.7
2.9




5.0
4.4
3.7
2.9
Corporate and Other15.4
15.9
16.6
13.2
14.0
10.1
12.0
28.9
15.4
15.9
Total Capital Expenditures
$247.8

$251.8

$604.3

$339.5

$432.2

$626.6

$318.6

$266.5

$247.8

$251.8
(a)In 2015, operating revenue and operating expenses included $197.7 million and $162.9 million, respectively, for the construction and sale of a wind energy facility fromby ALLETE Clean Energy to Montana-Dakota Utilities for $197.7Utilities. In 2018, operating revenue and operating expenses included $81.1 million and $162.9$67.4 million, respectively.respectively, for the sale of a wind energy facility by ALLETE Clean Energy to Montana-Dakota Utilities.
(b)The non-controlling interest relatedIn 2019, ALLETE sold U.S. Water Services to ALLETE Clean Energy’s Condon wind energy facility was acquired on April 15, 2016. (See Note 6. Acquisitions.)a subsidiary of Kurita Water Industries Ltd.
(c)Excludes unallocated ESOP shares in eachThe year ended December 31, 2017 included the impact of the years 2012 through 2014.
(d)In April 2015, the FASB issued revised guidance addressing the presentation requirements for debt issuance costs. Under the revised guidance, all costs incurred to issue debt are to be presented on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as a direct deductionremeasurement of deferred income tax assets and liabilities resulting from the carrying amount of that debt liability. This guidance was adopted in the first quarter of 2016 resulting in the reclassification of unamortized debt issuance costs from Other Non-Current Assets to Long-Term Debt on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The periods presented have been revised for the adoption of the guidance.TCJA. (See Note 11. Income Tax Expense.)






Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations


The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and notes to those statements and the other financial information appearing elsewhere in this report. In addition to historical information, the following discussion and other parts of this Form 10-K contain forward-looking information that involves risks and uncertainties. Readers are cautioned that forward-looking statements should be read in conjunction with our disclosures in this Form 10-K under the headings: “Forward‑Looking Statements” located on page 6 and “Risk Factors” located in Item 1A. The risks and uncertainties described in this Form 10-K are not the only risks facing our Company. Additional risks and uncertainties that we are not presently aware of, or that we currently consider immaterial, may also affect our business operations. Our business, financial condition or results of operations could suffer if the risks are realized.




Overview


Basis of Presentation. We present three reportable segments: Regulated Operations, ALLETE Clean Energy and U.S. Water Services. Our segments were determined in accordance with the guidance on segment reporting. We measure performance of our operations through budgeting and monitoring of contributions to consolidated net income by each business segment.


Regulated Operations includes our regulated utilities, Minnesota Power and SWL&P, as well as our investment in ATC, a Wisconsin-based regulated utility that owns and maintains electric transmission assets in partsportions of Wisconsin, Michigan, Minnesota and Illinois. Minnesota Power provides regulated utility electric service in northeastern Minnesota to approximately 145,000 retail customers. Minnesota Power also has 1615 non-affiliated municipal customers in Minnesota. SWL&P is a Wisconsin utility and a wholesale customer of Minnesota Power. SWL&P provides regulated utility electric, natural gas and water service in northwestern Wisconsin to approximately 15,000 electric customers, 13,000 natural gas customers and 10,000 water customers. Our regulated utility operations include retail and wholesale activities under the jurisdiction of state and federal regulatory authorities. (See Note 4. Regulatory Matters.)


ALLETE Clean Energy focuses on developing, acquiring, and operating clean and renewable energy projects. ALLETE Clean Energy currently owns and operates, in fourfive states, approximately 535660 MW of nameplate capacity wind energy generation that is fromcontracted under PSAs underof various durations. In addition, ALLETE Clean Energy constructed and sold a 107currently has approximately 380 MW of wind energy facilityfacilities under construction that it will own and operate with long-term PSAs in 2015. On January 3, 2017,place. ALLETE Clean Energy announced that it will develop anotheralso engages in the development of wind energy facility of upfacilities to 50 MW after securing a 25‑year PSA. The PSA includes an optionoperate under long-term PSAs or for the counterpartysale to purchase the facilityothers upon development completion; construction is expected to begin in 2018.completion.


U.S. Water Services providesprovided integrated water management for industry by combining chemical, equipment, engineering and service for customized solutions to reduce water and energy usage, and improve efficiency. On March 26, 2019, the Company sold U.S. Water Services to a subsidiary of Kurita Water Industries Ltd. pursuant to a stock purchase agreement for approximately $270 million in cash, net of transaction costs and cash retained.


Corporate and Otheris comprised of BNI Energy, our coal mining operations in North Dakota, our investment in Nobles 2, a 49 percent equity interest in the entity that will own and operate a 250 MW wind energy facility in southwestern Minnesota, ALLETE Properties, our legacy Florida real estate investment, other business development and corporate expenditures, unallocated interest expense, a small amount of non-rate base generation, approximately 5,0004,000 acres of land in Minnesota, and earnings on cash and investments.


ALLETE is incorporated under the laws of Minnesota. Our corporate headquarters are in Duluth, Minnesota. Statistical information is presented as of December 31, 2016,2019, unless otherwise indicated. All subsidiaries are wholly-owned unless otherwise specifically indicated. References in this report to “we,” “us” and “our” are to ALLETE and its subsidiaries, collectively.


20162019 Financial Overview


The following net income discussion summarizes a comparison of the year ended December 31, 2016,2019, to the year ended December 31, 2015.2018.


Net income attributable to ALLETE for 2016in 2019 was $155.3$185.6 million, or $3.14$3.59 per diluted share, compared to $141.1$174.1 million, or $2.92$3.38 per diluted share, for 2015.

in 2018. Net income in 2019 included the gain on sale of U.S. Water Services of $13.2 million after-tax, or $0.26 per share, and U.S. Water Services results of operations amounted to a net loss of $1.1 million after-tax, or $0.02 per share. Net income in 2018 included $10.2 million after-tax, or $0.20 per share, for 2016 was impacted bythe sale of a gain relatedwind energy facility to Montana-Dakota Utilities, $3.2 million after-tax, or $0.06 per share, from U.S. Water Services and a $2.0 million after-tax, or $0.04 per share, benefit for the change in fair value of the U.S. Water Services contingent consideration liability, offset by the impact of an adverse November 2016 MPUC order on the allocation of North Dakota investment tax credits, a goodwill impairment charge and expense related to the repayment of long-term debt.liability. Earnings per share dilution in 20162019 was $0.07$0.01 due to additional shares of common stock outstanding as of December 31, 2016.2019.



2016 Financial Overview (Continued)

Net income for 2015 was impacted by a non-cash impairment charge related to the real estate assets of ALLETE Properties, the recognition of profit for the construction of a wind energy facility sold to Montana-Dakota Utilities and acquisition costs related to U.S. Water Services and ALLETE Clean Energy.

Regulated Operations net income attributable to ALLETE was $135.5$154.4 million in 2016,2019, compared to $131.6$131.0 million in 2015.2018. Net income for 2016 increased at Minnesota Power was higher than 2018 primarily due to higherlower operating and maintenance and property tax expenses, increased cost recovery rider revenue, production tax creditshigher transmission margins and FERC formula-based rates, as well as lower operating and maintenance expenses.higher fuel adjustment clause recoveries. These increases were partially offset by lower kWh sales. Net income at SWL&P was higher depreciation expense, lower industrial sales and demand revenue, and restoration costs associated with a severe storm in July 2016.than 2018 primarily due to higher rates resulting from the implementation of new rates on January 1, 2019. Our after-tax equity earnings in ATC increased $1.3 million after-tax, or $0.03 per share, in 2016,were higher than 2018 primarily due to additional investments in ATC and period over period changes in ATC’s estimate of a refund liability related to the FERC decision on MISO return on equity complaints. (See Note 5. Equity Investments.)


2019 Financial Overview (Continued)

ALLETE Clean Energy’s Energy net income attributable to ALLETE was $13.4$12.4 million in 20162019 compared to $29.9$33.7 million in 2015.2018. Net income for 2015in 2018 included the recognition of profit of $20.4$10.2 million after-tax or $0.42 per share, for the constructionsale of a wind energy facility sold to Montana-Dakota Utilities. In 2015, netUtilities and $3.0 million of production tax credits that resulted from the retrospective qualification of additional wind turbine generators in 2016 and 2017. Net income alsoin 2019 included $1.8 million after-tax expense, or $0.04 per share, in acquisition costslower revenue resulting from lower non-cash amortization related to the Chanarambie/Vikingexpiration of power sales agreements as well as lower wind resources and Armenia Mountain wind energy facilities. Net incomeavailability, and higher depreciation expense. These decreases were partially offset by $5.3 million of additional production tax credits generated in 2016 included a $3.3 million after-tax, or $0.07 per share, goodwill impairment charge and a $0.9 million after-tax expense, or $0.02 per share, related2019 compared to the repayment of long-term debt. Earningsproduction tax credits generated in 2016 earnings were positively impacted by income generated from the operations of wind energy facilities acquired in April and July 2015.2018 as ALLETE Clean Energy continues to execute its refurbishment strategy.


U.S. Water Services net loss attributable to ALLETE was $1.1 million in 2019, compared to net income of $3.2 million in 2018. ALLETE completed the sale of U.S. Water Services in the first quarter of 2019.

Corporate and Othernet income attributable to ALLETE was $1.5$19.9 million in 2016,2019 compared to $0.9$6.2 million for the period from February 10, 2015, through December 31, 2015.in 2018. Net income for 2015in 2019 included an additional $1.9 millionthe gain on sale of after-tax expense, or $0.04 per share, recognized as cost of sales related to purchase accounting for inventories and sales backlog. Net income for 2016 reflects increased investments in back office systems and support at U.S. Water Services as we createof $13.2 million after-tax, of which $2.1 million after-tax was recognized in the fourth quarter of 2019 for the favorable settlement of a platform for future growth.

Corporate and Other net income attributable to ALLETE was $4.9 million in 2016, compared to a net loss of $21.3 million in 2015.U.S. Water Services patent infringement case. Net income in 20162019 also included anhigher earnings on cash and investments. Net income in 2018 included a $2.0 million after-tax gain of $13.6 million, or $0.28 per share, related tobenefit for the change in fair value of the U.S. Water Services contingent consideration liability. Net income in 2016 also included an $8.8 million after-tax, or $0.18 per share, impact of an adverse November 2016 MPUC order on the allocation of North Dakota investment tax credits. (See Note 4. Regulatory Matters.) In 2015, the net loss included a $22.3 million after-tax, or $0.46 per share, non-cash impairment charge relating to the real estate assets of ALLETE Properties and $3.0 million after-tax expense, or $0.06 per share, in acquisition costs related to U.S. Water Services.




20162019 Compared to 20152018


(See Note 17.14. Business Segments for financial results by segment.)


Regulated Operations
Year Ended December 312016
2015
2019
2018
Millions  
Operating Revenue
$1,000.7

$991.2
Fuel and Purchased Power332.9
328.1
Transmission Services65.2
54.1
Cost of Sales7.0
7.9
Operating Revenue – Utility
$1,042.4

$1,059.5
Fuel, Purchased Power and Gas – Utility390.7
407.5
Transmission Services – Utility69.8
69.9
Operating and Maintenance220.7
229.6
201.9
220.1
Depreciation and Amortization154.3
135.1
159.4
158.0
Taxes Other than Income Taxes47.7
46.2
48.4
52.5
Operating Income172.9
190.2
172.2
151.5
Interest Expense(52.1)(53.9)(58.9)(60.2)
Equity Earnings in ATC18.5
16.3
21.7
17.5
Other Income2.1
3.4
12.3
6.7
Income Before Income Taxes141.4
156.0
147.3
115.5
Income Tax Expense5.9
24.4
Income Tax Expense (Benefit)(7.1)(15.5)
Net Income Attributable to ALLETE$135.5
$131.6
$154.4
$131.0



2016 Compared to 2015 (Continued)
Regulated Operations (Continued)

Operating Revenue increased $9.5 – Utility decreased $17.1 million or 1 percent, from 20152018 primarily due to higher transmissionlower revenue from kWh sales and conservation improvement recoveries, partially offset by increased cost recovery rider revenue, pricing on PSAs with Other Power Suppliershigher fuel adjustment clause recoveries and higher FERC formula-based rates,rates.

Revenue from kWh sales decreased $43.3 million from 2018 reflecting lower sales to residential, commercial and municipal customers as well as lower sales to other power suppliers. Sales to residential and commercial customers decreased from 2018 primarily due to milder weather conditions in 2019. Sales to industrial customers in 2019 were similar to 2018 reflecting higher sales to Silver Bay Power as it ceased self-generation in the third quarter of 2019, partially offset by lower sales to Husky Energy due to an April 2018 fire at its refinery in Superior, Wisconsin. Sales to municipal customers decreased from 2018 as a result of additional customer self-generation in 2019 and the expiration of a contract with a municipal customer on June 30, 2019. Sales to other power suppliers decreased in 2019 primarily due to fewer market sales and sales under PSAs as a result of less generation available for sale, partially offset by the impactcommencement of an adverse November 2016 MPUC order on the allocation of North Dakota investment tax credits as well as lower conservation improvement program recoveries.

Transmission revenue increased $9.7 million primarily due to period over period changesMinnesota Power’s PSA with Oconto Electric Cooperative in our estimate of a refund liability related to MISO return on equity complaints and higher MISO-related revenue. (See Operating Expenses - Transmission Services.)

Cost recovery rider revenue increased $7.5 million primarily due to the completion of the Boswell Unit 4 environmental upgrade in the fourth quarter of 2015.

Despite lower kWh sales, revenue increased $4.9 million from 2015 primarily due to higher pricing on PSAs with Other Power Suppliers in 2016.January 2019. Sales to Other Power Suppliersother power suppliers are sold at market-based prices into the MISO market on a daily basis or through bilateral agreementsPSAs of various durations. Sales


2019 Compared to industrial customers decreased 2.7 percent primarily due to reduced taconite production. In addition, demand revenue from industrial customers was down in 2016 as a result of lower demand nominations.2018 (Continued)
Regulated Operations (Continued)
Kilowatt-hours Sold
2016
2015
Quantity
Variance
%
Variance
2019
2018
Quantity
Variance
%
Variance
Millions      
Regulated Utility    
Retail and Municipal      
Residential1,102
1,113
(11)(1.0)1,130
1,140
(10)(0.9)
Commercial1,442
1,462
(20)(1.4)1,390
1,426
(36)(2.5)
Industrial6,456
6,635
(179)(2.7)7,277
7,261
16
0.2
Municipal816
833
(17)(2.0)672
798
(126)(15.8)
Total Retail and Municipal9,816
10,043
(227)(2.3)10,469
10,625
(156)(1.5)
Other Power Suppliers4,316
4,310
6
0.1
3,185
3,953
(768)(19.4)
Total Regulated Utility Kilowatt-hours Sold14,132
14,353
(221)(1.5)13,654
14,578
(924)(6.3)


Revenue from electric sales to taconite/iron concentratetaconite customers accounted for 1825 percent of consolidated operating revenue in 2016 (172019 (21 percent in 2015)2018). Revenue from electric sales to paper, pulp and secondary wood product customers accounted for 6 percent of consolidated operating revenue in 2016 (62019 (4 percent in 2015)2018). Revenue from electric sales to pipelines and other industrial customers accounted for 7 percent of consolidated operating revenue in 20162019 (6 percent in 2015)2018).


Conservation improvement program recoveries decreased $5.9 million from 2018 primarily due to a decrease in related expenditures.

Cost recovery rider revenue contributed an incremental $14.0 million over current base rates compared to 2018 (see Note 4. Regulatory Matters) primarily due to higher expenditures related to the construction of the GNTL and lower transmission margins related to our portion of CapX2020 transmission lines. Transmission margins for CapX2020 transmission lines recognized below those assumed in Minnesota Power base rates result in increased cost recovery rider revenue to offset the impact of the lower margins.

Fuel adjustment clause revenue increased $13.1 million due to period over period timing of recoveries for fuel and purchased power costs attributable to retail and municipal customers. Beginning in 2020, the method of accounting for all Minnesota electric utilities changed to a monthly budgeted, forward-looking FAC with annual prudence review and true-up to actual allowed costs. (See Note 4. Regulatory Matters.)

Revenue from wholesale customers under FERC formula-based rates increased $3.8 million primarily due to additional environmental and other investments.

Revenue decreased $15.0 million due to the impact of an adverse November 2016 MPUC order on the allocation of North Dakota investment tax credits. (See Note 4. Regulatory Matters.)

Conservation improvement program recoveries decreased $4.1$3.3 million from 2015 primarily due to a reduction in related expenditures. (See Operating Expenses - Operating and Maintenance Expense.)

Operating Expenses increased $26.8 million, or 3 percent, from 2015.

Fuel and Purchased Power expense increased $4.8 million, or 1 percent, from 20152018 primarily due to higher fuelrates.

Transmission revenue was similar to 2018 reflecting a $4.4 million out-of-period adjustment in 2018 for an estimated true-up of MISO rates that were billed in 2017 and credited to customers in 2019, mostly offset by lower MISO-related revenue in 2019.

Operating Expenses decreased $37.8 million, or 4 percent, from 2018.

Fuel, Purchased Power and Gas – Utility expense decreased $16.8 million, or 4 percent, from 2018 primarily due to lower kWh sales, purchased power prices in 2016 compared to 2015,and fuel costs, partially offset by lower kWh sales in 2016.higher costs of purchased power from Square Butte. Fuel and purchased power expense related to our retail and municipal customers is recovered through the fuel adjustment clause.


Transmission Services Operating and Maintenance expense increased $11.1decreased $18.2 million, or 218 percent, from 20152018 primarily due to higher MISO-relatedlower salary and benefit expenses, maintenance contract expenses and materials purchased for generation facilities as well as a decrease in severance expense and period over period changesof $2.3 million in our estimate of a refund for MISO transmission expense related2019.

Taxes Other than Income Taxes decreased $4.1 million, or 8 percent, from 2018 primarily due to MISO return on equity complaints. (See Operating Revenue and Note 4. Regulatory Matters.)lower property tax expenses resulting from lower estimated taxable market values.



20162019 Compared to 20152018 (Continued)
Regulated Operations (Continued)


Operating and Maintenance expenseInterest Expense decreased $8.9$1.3 million, or 42 percent, from 2015, primarily due to lower pension and other postretirement benefit expenses (see Note. 15 Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans), a $3.6 million sales tax refund received in 2016 and a $4.1 million decrease in conservation improvement program expenses. Conservation improvement program expenses are recovered from certain retail customers. (See Operating Revenue.) Operating and Maintenance expense included higher storm restoration costs of approximately $3 million related to the severe wind storms across Minnesota Power’s service territory in July 2016.

Depreciation and Amortization expense increased $19.2 million, or 14 percent, from 2015 primarily due to additional property, plant and equipment in service.

Taxes Other than Income Taxes increased $1.5 million, or 3 percent, from 2015 primarily due to higher property tax expenses resulting from higher taxable plant.

Interest Expense decreased $1.8 million, or 3 percent, from 20152018 primarily due to lower average long-term debt balances for our Regulated Operations and interest rates.on Minnesota Power’s reserve for interim rate refunds. We record interest expense for Regulated Operations primarily based on Minnesota Power’s rate base and authorized capital structure, and allocate the balance to Corporate and Other.


Equity Earnings in ATC increased $2.2$4.2 million, or 1324 percent, from20152018 primarily due to additional investments in ATC and period over period changes in ATC’s estimate of a refund liability related to the FERC decision on MISO return on equity complaints. (See Note 5. Equity Investments.)


Other Income decreased $1.3 increased $5.6 million or 38 percent, from 2015 primarily due to2018 reflecting higher AFUDC – Equity and lower AFUDC–Equity.pension and other postretirement benefit plan non-service costs. (See Note 12. Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans.)


Income Tax Expense decreased $18.5Benefit was $7.1 million or 76 percent, from 2015 duein 2019 compared to lowerincome tax benefit of $15.5 million in 2018. The income tax benefit in 2019 reflects higher pre-tax income, partially offset by higher production tax credits and the impact of accounting for an adverse November 2016 MPUC order on the allocation of prior period North Dakota investment tax credits. (See Note 4. Regulatory Matters.) As a result of this outcome, our Regulated Operations reduced operating revenue and recorded a corresponding regulatory liability for $15.0 million in 2016. In addition, our Regulated Operations recorded a tax benefit of $8.8 million and Corporate and Other recorded a corresponding $8.8 million tax expense.


ALLETE Clean Energy
Year Ended December 312016
2015
2019
2018
Millions  
Operating Revenue
$80.5

$262.1
 
Net Income Attributable to ALLETE$13.4
$29.9
Contracts with Customers – Non-utility (a)

$48.0

$136.3
Other – Non-utility (b)
11.6
23.6
Cost of Sales – Non-utility (a)

67.4
Operating and Maintenance29.5
29.9
Depreciation and Amortization26.8
24.4
Taxes Other than Income Taxes2.1
2.1
Operating Income1.2
36.1
Interest Expense(2.8)(3.6)
Other Income2.0
0.2
Income Before Income Taxes0.4
32.7
Income Tax Expense (Benefit)(11.9)(1.0)
Net Income12.3
33.7
Less: Non-Controlling Interest in Subsidiaries (c)
(0.1)
Net Income Attributable to ALLETE (a)
$12.4
$33.7
(a)In 2018, operating revenue and operating expenses included $81.1 million and $67.4 million, respectively, for the sale of a wind energy facility by ALLETE Clean Energy to Montana-Dakota Utilities.
(b)Represents non-cash amortization of differences between contract prices and estimated market prices on assumed PSAs.
(c)See Note 1. Operations and Significant Accounting Policies.


Operating Revenuedecreased $181.6$100.3 million from 2015. Operating revenue in 2015 included2018 primarily due to the recognition of $197.7 million in revenue for the constructionsale of a wind energy facility sold to Montana-Dakota Utilities in 2015. Operating2018 and lower kWh sales resulting from lower wind resources and availability. In addition, revenue in 2016decreased $12.0 million due to lower non-cash amortization related to the expiration of power sales agreements. In 2019, two PSAs expired and the related non-cash revenue was positively impacted by additional revenue generated from the operations of wind energy facilities acquired in Aprilfully amortized. (See Note 1. Operations and July 2015.
 Year Ended December 31,
 20162015
Production and Operating RevenuekWhRevenuekWhRevenue
Millions    
Wind Energy Facility    
Lake Benton254.7

$12.8
265.1

$13.5
Storm Lake II154.8
10.1
186.4
11.7
Condon96.9
8.2
84.1
7.8
Storm Lake I222.3
11.6
230.7
12.1
Chanarambie/Viking278.8
13.4
199.1
9.8
Armenia Mountain268.2
24.4
111.6
9.5
Total Wind Energy Facilities1,275.7
80.5
1,077.0
64.4
Development Fee (a)



197.7
Total Production and Operating Revenue1,275.7
$80.51,077.0

$262.1
(a)    2015 included the recognition of $162.9 million of cost of sales.Significant Accounting Policies – Revenue – ALLETE Clean Energy – Other and Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis – Outlook – ALLETE Clean Energy.)



20162019 Compared to 20152018 (Continued)
ALLETE Clean Energy (Continued)

Net Income Attributable to ALLETE
 Year Ended December 31,
 20192018
Production and Operating RevenuekWhRevenuekWhRevenue
Millions    
Wind Energy Regions    
East232.9

$21.0
264.5

$24.1
Midwest805.8
32.4
791.6
46.6
West87.8
6.2
99.6
8.1
Total Wind Energy Facilities1,126.5
59.6
1,155.7
78.8
Sale of Wind Energy Facility


81.1
Total Production and Operating Revenue1,126.5
$59.61,155.7

$159.9

Cost of Salesdecreased $16.5$67.4 million from 2015. Net income for 2015 included2018 due to the recognition of profit of $20.4 million after-tax for the constructionsale of a wind energy facility sold to Montana-Dakota Utilities. In 2015, net income also includedUtilities in 2018.

Depreciation and Amortizationexpense increased $2.4 million, or 10 percent, from 2018 primarily due to additional property, plant and equipment in service.

Other Incomeincreased $1.8 million after-tax expensefrom 2018 reflecting various individually immaterial items.

Income Tax Benefit increased $10.9 million from 2018 primarily due to additional production tax credits generated in acquisition costs related to2019 and lower pre-tax income. The income tax benefit reflected production tax credits generated of $10.9 million in 2019 and $5.6 million in 2018. The income tax benefit in 2018 also reflected $3.0 million of production tax credits that resulted from the Chanarambie/Viking and Armenia Mountainretrospective qualification of additional wind energy facilities. Net incometurbine generators in 2016 included a $3.3and 2017.

U.S. Water Services
Year Ended December 312019
2018
Millions  
Operating Revenue
$33.4

$172.1
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to ALLETE$(1.1)
$3.2

Operating Revenue decreased $138.7 million after-tax non-cash goodwill impairment charge (seefrom 2018. ALLETE sold U.S. Water Services in the first quarter of 2019. (See Note 1. Operations and Significant Accounting Policies) and a $0.9 million after-tax expense related to the repayment of long-term debt. Earnings in 2016 were positively impacted by income generated from the operations of wind energy facilities acquired in April and July 2015.Policies.)

U.S. Water Services
 Year Ended
Period February 10, 2015
 December 31, 2016
Through December 31, 2015
Millions  
Operating Revenue
$137.5

$119.8
Net Income Attributable to ALLETE$1.5
$0.9

Operating Revenue increased $17.7 million in 2016 compared to the period from February 10, 2015, to December 31, 2015. The results for 2015 reflect operations from the date of acquisition, February 10, 2015, through December 31, 2015, and therefore, do not reflect a full year. Revenue from chemical sales and related services, which includes recurring revenue contracts for the delivery and service of chemicals, was $110.5 million in 2016 compared to $92.5 million in 2015. Revenue from equipment and related services, which includes sales of water treatment equipment, was $27.0 million in 2016 compared to $27.3 million in 2015; equipment sales can fluctuate from period to period. U.S. Water Services strives to provide a full‑service product offering to customers including equipment, chemicals, engineering and service.

Net Income Attributable to ALLETE increased$0.6 million in 2016 compared to the period from February 10, 2015, to December 31, 2015. The results for 2015 reflect operations from the date of acquisition, February 10, 2015, through December 31, 2015, and therefore do not reflect a full year. Net income in 2015 included an additional $1.9 million of after‑tax expense recognized as cost of sales related to purchase accounting for inventories and sales backlog which have been fully recognized as of December 31, 2016. Earnings in 2016 reflected increased investments in back office systems and support at U.S. Water Services as we create a platform for future growth.


Corporate and Other


Operating Revenue increased $7.7 decreased $2.0 million, or 72 percent, from 20152018 primarily due to an increase in land sales at ALLETE Properties, which sold its Ormond Crossings projectlower revenue from non-rate base generation and Lake Swamp wetland mitigation bank in 2016. The increase was partially offset by a decrease inlower revenue at BNI Energy, which operates under cost-plus fixed fee contracts, as a result of lower expenses and fewer tons sold in 20162019 compared to 2015.2018. These increases were partially offset by higher land sales at ALLETE Properties.


Net Income Attributable to ALLETEincreased$26.2 was $19.9 million from 2015.in 2019 compared to $6.2 million in 2018. Net income in 20162019 included anthe gain on sale of U.S. Water Services of $13.2 million after-tax, gain of $13.6which $2.1 million related toafter-tax was recognized in the fourth quarter of 2019 for the favorable settlement of a U.S. Water Services patent infringement case. Net income in 2019 also included higher earnings on cash and investments. Net income in 2018 included a $2.0 million after-tax benefit for the change in fair value of the contingent consideration liability. Net income at BNI Energy was $7.4 million in 2019 compared to $6.8 million in 2018, reflecting higher earnings from investments in 2019. Net income at ALLETE Properties was $0.3 million in 2019 compared to a net loss of $0.5 million in 2018 reflecting higher land sales in 2019.

Income Taxes – Consolidated

For the year ended December 31, 2019, the effective tax rate was a benefit of 3.7 percent (benefit of 9.8 percent for the year ended December 31, 2018). The effective tax rate for 2019 was a lower benefit primarily due to higher pre-tax income resulting from the gain on sale of U.S. Water Services contingent consideration liability and increased land sales at ALLETE Properties,a higher effective tax rate on the gain, partially offset by the $8.8higher production tax credits. (See Note 11. Income Tax Expense.)


2018 Compared to 2017

(See Note 14. Business Segments for financial results by segment.)

Regulated Operations
Year Ended December 312018
2017
Millions  
Operating Revenue – Utility
$1,059.5

$1,063.8
Fuel, Purchased Power and Gas – Utility407.5
396.9
Transmission Services – Utility69.9
71.2
Operating and Maintenance220.1
227.3
Depreciation and Amortization158.0
132.6
Taxes Other than Income Taxes52.5
51.1
Operating Income151.5
184.7
Interest Expense(60.2)(57.0)
Equity Earnings in ATC17.5
22.5
Other Income6.7
5.4
Income Before Income Taxes115.5
155.6
Income Tax Expense (Benefit)(15.5)27.2
Net Income Attributable to ALLETE$131.0$128.4

Operating Revenue – Utility decreased $4.3 million after-taxfrom 2017 primarily due to lower transmission revenue, the impact of a regulatory outcome in 2017 related to the allocation of North Dakota investment tax credits, provision for tax reform refund related to income tax changes resulting from the TCJA, and lower financial incentives under the Minnesota conservation improvement program, partially offset by higher revenue from kWh sales, cost recovery rider revenue, fuel clause adjustment recoveries, and conservation improvement program recoveries.

Transmission revenue decreased $15.0 million primarily due to lower MISO-related revenue and a $4.4 million out-of-period adjustment for an adverse November 2016 MPUC order onestimated true-up of MISO rates that were billed in 2017 and credited to customers in 2019.

Revenue decreased $14.0 million due to the impact of a regulatory outcome in 2017 related to the allocation of North Dakota investment tax credits. (This decrease in revenue was offset by the income tax impacts of the regulatory outcome resulting in no impact to net income for Regulated Operations - Operations. (See Note 4. Regulatory Matters and Income Tax Expense.Benefit.) In 2015,

Revenue decreased $11.9 million from 2017 reflecting income tax changes resulting from the net loss included a $22.3 million after-tax non-cash impairment charge relating to the real estate assets of ALLETE Properties and $3.0 million after-tax expense in acquisition costsTCJA primarily related to U.S. Water Services. Net income at BNI Energy increased to $6.8 million in 2016 compared to $6.7 million in 2015, and net income at ALLETE Properties increased to $0.7 million in 2016 compared to a net loss of $23.3 million in 2015.

Income Taxes – Consolidated

For the year ended December 31, 2016, the effectiveprovision for tax rate was 11.3 percent (15.2 percentreform refund for the year ended December 31, 2015). The decrease frombenefit of excess deferred income taxes in 2018. We have recorded the year ended December 31, 2015, was primarily due to increased production tax credits in 2016 related to additional wind energy generation. The effective rate deviated from the combined statutory ratebenefit of approximately 41 percent primarily due to production tax credits.these excess deferred income taxes for Minnesota Power and SWL&P as regulatory liabilities. (See Note 13. Income Tax Expense.4. Regulatory Matters.)




2015 Compared to 2014

(See Note 17. Business Segments for financial results by segment.)

Regulated Operations
Year Ended December 312015
2014
Millions  
Operating Revenue
$991.2

$1,003.5
Fuel and Purchased Power328.1
356.1
Transmission Services54.1
45.6
Cost of Sales7.9
17.3
Operating and Maintenance229.6
240.8
Depreciation and Amortization135.1
118.0
Taxes Other than Income Taxes46.2
41.9
Operating Income190.2
183.8
Interest Expense(53.9)(49.2)
Equity Earnings in ATC16.3
19.6
Other Income3.4
7.8
Income Before Income Taxes156.0
162.0
Income Tax Expense24.4
39.0
Net Income Attributable to ALLETE$131.6$123.0

Operating Revenue decreased $12.3 million, or 1 percent, from 2014 primarily due to lower fuel adjustment clause recoveries, gas sales, and financial incentives under the Minnesota Conservation Improvement Program, partially offset by higher cost recovery rider revenue, kWh sales, FERC formula based rates and transmission revenue.

Fuel adjustment clause recoveries decreased $37.1 million due to lower fuel and purchased power costs attributable to retail and municipal customers. (See Operating Expenses - Fuel and Purchased Power Expense.)

Gas sales at SWL&P decreased $11.0 million from 2014 primarily as a result of unseasonably cold weather during the first half of 2014 and a warmer than average 2015. (See Cost of Sales.)


Financial incentives under the Minnesota Conservation Improvement Program decreasedconservation improvement program were lower by $2.5 million from 20142017 as a result of annual limits placedMPUC-approved modifications to the mechanism for calculating the financial incentives.

Interim retail rates of $29.5 million collected in 2018 were fully offset by the recognition of a corresponding reserve throughout the year. In the fourth quarter of 2017, Minnesota Power recognized interim retail rate refund reserves of $31.6 million to fully offset interim retail rates collected throughout the year in 2017 due to the regulatory outcome of the MPUC’s decision in Minnesota Power’s 2016 general rate case at a hearing on recoveries beginningJanuary 18, 2018.

Revenue increased $13.5 million from 2017 reflecting higher kWh sales to Residential and Commercial customers, and higher pricing on sales to Other Power Suppliers. Sales to Residential and Commercial customers increased in 2015.

Cost recovery rider revenue increased $17.8 million2018 primarily due to more favorable weather conditions in 2018 compared to 2017. Sales to Industrial customers decreased 0.9 percent reflecting lower sales to UPM Blandin as a result of the completionclosure of Bisonthe smaller of its two paper machines in the fourth quarter of 2017 and CapX2020 projects as well as higher capital expenditures related to the Boswell Unit 4 environmental upgrade.

Revenue increased $14.7 millionHusky Energy due to an April 2018 fire at its refinery in Superior, Wisconsin, partially offset by increased taconite production. Revenue from Other Power Suppliers increased due to higher pricing on sales, partially offset by 3.12.1 percent increasedecrease in kWh sales.sales from 2017. Sales to Other Power Suppliers are sold at market-based prices into the MISO market on a daily basis or through bilateral agreementsPSAs of various durations, and increased 48.4 percent in 2015 compared to 2014 primarily due to the commencement of the Minnkota Power PSA in June 2014. (See Note 11. Commitments, Guarantees and Contingencies.) Sales to residential and municipal customers were impacted by unseasonably cold temperatures in 2014 and warmer than average temperatures in 2015. Heating degree days in Duluth, Minnesota, were approximately 16 percent lower in 2015 compared to 2014. Sales to industrial customers decreased 11.4 percent primarily due to reduced taconite production.durations.



20152018 Compared to 20142017 (Continued)
Regulated Operations (Continued)
Kilowatt-hours Sold
2015
2014
Quantity
Variance
%
Variance
2018
2017
Quantity
Variance
%
Variance
Millions      
Regulated Utility    
Retail and Municipal      
Residential1,113
1,204
(91)(7.6)1,140
1,096
44
4.0
Commercial1,462
1,468
(6)(0.4)1,426
1,420
6
0.4
Industrial6,635
7,487
(852)(11.4)7,261
7,327
(66)(0.9)
Municipal833
864
(31)(3.6)798
799
(1)(0.1)
Total Retail and Municipal10,043
11,023
(980)(8.9)10,625
10,642
(17)(0.2)
Other Power Suppliers4,310
2,904
1,406
48.4
3,953
4,039
(86)(2.1)
Total Regulated Utility Kilowatt-hours Sold14,353
13,927
426
3.1
14,578
14,681
(103)(0.7)


Revenue from electric sales to taconite and iron concentrate customers accounted for 1721 percent of consolidated operating revenue in 2015(252018 (22 percent in 2014)2017). Revenue from electric sales to paper, pulp and secondary wood product customers accounted for 64 percent of consolidated operating revenue in 2015 (82018 (5 percent in 2014)2017). Revenue from electric sales to pipelines and other industrial customers accounted for 6 percent of consolidated operating revenue in 20152018 (7 percent in 2014)2017).


Revenue to wholesale customers under FERC formula based rates increased $6.9 million primarily due to additional renewable, environmental and other investments.

TransmissionCost recovery rider revenue increased $2.7$13.0 million primarily due to higher MISO-relatedexpenditures related to the construction of the GNTL and fewer production tax credits recognized by Minnesota Power. If production tax credits are recognized at a level below those assumed in Minnesota Power’s base rates, an increase in cost recovery rider revenue which wasis recognized to offset the impact of lower production tax credits on income tax expense.

Fuel adjustment clause recoveries increased $7.9 million due to higher fuel and purchased power costs attributable to retail and municipal customers.

Conservation improvement program recoveries increased $3.5 million from 2017 primarily due to an increase in related expenditures. (See Operating Expenses - Operating and Maintenance.)

Operating Expenses increased $28.9 million, or 3 percent, from 2017.

Fuel, Purchased Power and Gas – Utility expense increased $10.6 million, or 3 percent, from 2017 primarily due to higher purchased power prices and higher fuel costs, partially offset by an estimated refunda $19.5 million expense in 2017 for MISO transmission revenuethe MPUC’s decision disallowing recovery of Minnesota Power’s regulatory asset for deferred fuel adjustment clause costs. At a hearing on January 18, 2018, the MPUC disallowed Minnesota Power’s regulatory asset for deferred fuel adjustment clause costs due to the MISO return on equity complaints. (See Operating Expenses - Transmission Services and Note 4. Regulatory Matters.)

Operating Expenses decreased $18.7anticipated adoption of a forward-looking fuel adjustment clause methodology resulting in a $19.5 million or 2 percent, from 2014.

Fuel and Purchased Power expense decreased $28.0 million, or 8 percent, from 2014 primarily due to lower purchased power and fuel pricescharge in 2015 compared to 2014, partially offset by higher kWh sales in 2015.the fourth quarter of 2017. Fuel and purchased power expense related to our retail and municipal customers is recovered through the fuel adjustment clause. (See Operating Revenue.Revenue – Utility.)
 
Transmission Services Operating and Maintenance expense decreased $7.2 million, or 3 percent, from 2017 primarily due to lower salary and benefit expenses, and lower materials purchased for generation facilities, partially offset by a $3.5 million increase in conservation improvement program expenses and additional severance expense of $1.9 million in 2018. (See Operating Revenue – Utility.)

Depreciation and Amortization expense increased $8.5$25.4 million, or 19 percent, from 20142017 primarily due to higher MISO-related expense, which was partially offset by an estimated refund for MISO transmission expense due to the MISO return on equity complaints. (See Operating Revenue and Note 4. Regulatory Matters.)

Cost of Sales decreased $9.4 million, or 54 percent, from 2014 due to lower purchased gas at SWL&P.(See Operating Revenue.)

Operating and Maintenance expense decreased $11.2 million, or 5 percent, from 2014, due to cost reduction efforts and the absence of a $4.2 million expense that was recorded in 2014 to reflect a liability associated with environmental mitigation projects required as part of an EPA notice of violation Consent Decree settlement. Cost reduction efforts resulted in lower wage, vehicle fleet and miscellaneous employee expenses. These reductions were partially offset by increased expense for the operation and maintenancemodifications of the 205 MW addition at Bison that went into service in December 2014.

Depreciationdepreciable lives for Boswell and Amortization expense increased $17.1 million, or 14 percent, from 2014 primarily due to additional property, plant and equipment in service. As part of its decision in Minnesota Power’s 2016 general rate case, the MPUC extended the depreciable lives of Boswell Unit 3, Unit 4 and common facilities to 2050, and shortened the depreciable lives of Boswell Unit 1 and Unit 2 to 2022, resulting in a net decrease to depreciation expense of approximately $25 million in 2017. Subsequently, as part of the reconsideration of its decision in Minnesota Power’s 2016 general rate case, the MPUC reduced the depreciable lives of Boswell Unit 3, Unit 4 and common facilities to 2035, resulting in higher depreciation expense in 2018. The increase in depreciation expense in 2018 was offset mostly by the benefits of the lower federal income tax rate enacted as part of the TCJA. (See Note 4. Regulatory Matters and Income Tax Benefit.)

Taxes Other than Income Taxes
2018 Compared to 2017 (Continued)
Regulated Operations (Continued)

Interest Expenseincreased $4.3$3.2 million, or 106 percent, from 2014 primarily due to higher property tax expenses resulting from higher taxable plant and rates.

Interest Expense increased $4.7 million, or 10 percent, from 20142017 primarily due to higher average long-term debt balances.


2015 Compared to 2014 (Continued)
balances, higher interest rates and $0.5 million of interest on Minnesota Power’s reserve for interim rate refunds. We record interest expense for Regulated Operations (Continued)primarily based on rate base and authorized capital structure, and allocate the balance to Corporate and Other.


Equity Earnings in ATC decreased $3.3$5.0 million, or 1722 percent, from20142017 primarily due to the federal income tax rate change enacted as part of the TCJA, partially offset by additional investments in ATC. (See Note 5. Equity Investments.)

Income Tax Benefit was $15.5 million in 2018 compared to income tax expense of $27.2 million in 2017. The income tax benefit in 2018 reflects the reduction of the federal income tax rate from 35 percent to 21 percent enacted as part of the TCJA, the amortization of excess deferred income tax benefit resulting from the TCJA and lower pre-tax income. Income tax expense in 2017 included the impact of a $5.2 million expenseregulatory outcome in 2017 related to the MISO return on equity complaints,allocation of which $2.4 million was attributable to ATC’s change in estimate of a refund liability relating to prior years. (See Note 5. Investment in ATC.)North Dakota investment tax credits.


Other Income decreased $4.4 million, or 56 percent, from 2014 primarily due to lower AFUDC–Equity.

Income Tax Expense decreased $14.6 million, or 37 percent, from 2014 primarily due to increased production tax creditsIn 2017, as a result of the 205 MWfavorable impact for the regulatory outcome of the MPUC’s modification of its November 2016 order on the allocation of North Dakota investment tax credits, Regulated Operations increased operating revenue and reduced the corresponding regulatory liability by $14.0 million resulting in an income tax expense of $6.1 million. In addition, Regulated Operations recorded an income tax expense of $7.9 million for North Dakota investment tax credits transferred to BisonCorporate and Other, resulting in December 2014.no impact to net income for Regulated Operations. Corporate and Other recorded an offsetting income tax benefit of $7.9 million for the North Dakota investment tax credits transferred from Regulated Operations.


ALLETE Clean Energy
Year Ended December 31,2015
2014
Year Ended December 312018
2017
Millions  
Operating Revenue
$262.1

$33.2
 
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to ALLETE$29.9$3.3
Contracts with Customers – Non-utility (a)

$136.3

$56.9
Other – Non-utility (b)
23.6
23.6
Cost of Sales – Non-utility (a)
67.4

Operating and Maintenance29.9
23.5
Depreciation and Amortization24.4
23.4
Taxes Other than Income Taxes2.1
2.2
Operating Income36.1
31.4
Interest Expense(3.6)(4.2)
Other Income0.2
0.1
Income Before Income Taxes32.7
27.3
Income Tax Expense (Benefit) (c)
(1.0)(14.2)
Net Income Attributable to ALLETE$33.7
$41.5
(a)In 2018, operating revenue and operating expenses included $81.1 million and $67.4 million, respectively, for the sale of a wind energy facility by ALLETE Clean Energy to Montana-Dakota Utilities.
(b)Represents non-cash amortization of differences between contract prices and estimated market prices on assumed PSAs. (See Note 1. Operations and Significant Accounting Policies.)
(c)Income Tax Benefit in 2017 include a $23.6 million after-tax benefit due to the remeasurement of deferred income tax assets and liabilities resulting from the TCJA.


Operating Revenueincreased $228.9$79.4 million from 2014 primarily2017 due to the recognition of $197.7 million of revenue from the construction and sale of a wind energy facility to Montana-Dakota Utilities. The acquisitions of Storm Lake I in December 2014, Chanarambie/Viking in April 2015 and Armenia Mountain in July 2015 also contributed to the increase in revenue in 2015 compared to 2014.
 Year Ended December 31,
 20152014
Production and Operating RevenuekWhRevenuekWhRevenue
Millions    
Wind Energy Facility    
Lake Benton265.1

$13.5
264.7

$13.4
Storm Lake II186.4
11.7
169.4
11.1
Condon84.1
7.8
91.5
8.2
Storm Lake I230.7
12.1
9.0
0.5
Chanarambie/Viking199.1
9.8


Armenia Mountain111.6
9.5


Total Wind Energy Facilities1,077.0
64.4
534.6
33.2
Development Fee (a)

197.7


Total Production and Operating Revenue1,077.0
$262.1534.6

$33.2
(a)    2015 included the recognition of $162.9 million of cost of sales.

Net Income Attributable to ALLETE increased $26.6 million from 2014. Net income in 2015 included $20.4 million after‑tax due to the profit from the construction and sale of a wind energy facility to Montana-Dakota Utilities in 2018.


2018 Compared to 2017 (Continued)
ALLETE Clean Energy (Continued)
 Year Ended December 31,
 20182017
Production and Operating RevenuekWhRevenuekWhRevenue
Millions    
Wind Energy Regions    
East264.5

$24.1
267.4

$24.4
Midwest791.6
46.6
873.5
48.6
West99.6
8.1
90.7
7.5
Total Wind Energy Facilities1,155.7
78.8
1,231.6
80.5
Sale of Wind Energy Facility
81.1


Total Production and Operating Revenue1,155.7
$159.91,231.6

$80.5

Cost of Sales increased $67.4 million from 2017 due to the sale of a wind energy facility to Montana-Dakota Utilities in 2018.

Operating and $6.9Maintenanceexpense increased $6.4 million, relatedor 27 percent, from 2017 primarily due higher professional services and routine maintenance costs.

Income Tax Benefit decreased $13.2 million from 2017. Income tax benefit in 2017 included a $23.6 million after-tax benefit due to the remeasurement of deferred income generatedtax assets and liabilities resulting from the full yearTCJA. The income tax benefit in 2018 reflected production tax credits generated of operations$5.6 million, $3.0 million of Storm Lake Iproduction tax credits that resulted from the retrospective qualification of additional wind turbine generators in 2016 and the additions of Chanarambie/Viking2017, and Armenia Mountain. Net income in 2015 included $1.8 million after-tax expense in acquisition costs related to the acquisitions of the Chanarambie/Viking and Armenia Mountain wind energy facilities. Net income in 2014 included a $1.4 million after-tax expense in acquisition costs related to the January 2014 acquisition.higher pre-tax income.



2015 Compared to 2014 (Continued)


U.S. Water Services
Year Ended December 312018
2017
Millions  
Operating Revenue
$172.1

$151.8
Net Income Attributable to ALLETE (a)
$3.2
$10.7
For(a)Results in 2017 include a $9.2 million after-tax benefit due to the Period February 10, 2015 through December 312015
Millions
Operating Revenue
$119.8
Net Income Attributable to ALLETE$0.9remeasurement of deferred income tax assets and liabilities resulting from the TCJA.


Operating Revenue was $119.8increased $20.3 million for the period February 10, 2015, through December 31, 2015.from 2017. Revenue from chemical sales and related services which includes recurring revenue contracts for the delivery and service of chemicals, amountedwas $138.6 million in 2018 compared to $92.5$132.0 million in 2017. Revenue from capital projects was $33.5 million for the period February 10, 2015, through December 31, 2015.2018 compared to $19.8 million in 2017. Revenue in 2018 reflected a full year of sales from equipment and related services,Tonka Water, which includes sales of water treatment equipment, amounted to $27.3 million for the period February 10, 2015, through December 31, 2015. U.S. Water Services strives to provide a full-service product offering to customers including equipment, chemicals, engineering and service.was acquired in September 2017.


Net Income Attributable to ALLETE was $0.9decreased $7.5 million for the period February 10, 2015, through December 31, 2015.from 2017. Net income in 2017 included $2.2a $9.2 million after-tax benefit due to the remeasurement of deferred income tax assets and liabilities resulting from the TCJA. Net income in 2018 included increased revenue primarily due to higher capital project sales and higher sales of chemicals and related services, partially offset by higher operating expenses. Net income in 2018 included $0.6 million of after-tax expense recognized as cost of sales related to purchase accounting for inventories and sales backlog; the total impact was $2.5 million after-tax, with the remainder recognized in 2016.backlog.


Corporate and Other


Operating Revenue increased $13.2 decreased $16.1 million, or 13 percent, from 20142017 primarily due to an increasea decrease in land sales at ALLETE Properties and lower revenue at BNI Energy, which operates under cost-plus fixed fee contracts, as a result of higherlower expenses and increased coal deliveredfewer tons sold in 2015. Increased sales at ALLETE Properties also contributed2018 compared to the increase.2017.


Net Income Attributable to ALLETE decreasedwas $6.2 million in 2018 compared to a net loss of $8.4 million in 2017. The net loss in 2017 included additional income tax expense of $19.8 million after-tax for the remeasurement of deferred income tax assets and liabilities resulting from 2014 primarilythe TCJA and a $7.9 million after-tax favorable impact for the regulatory outcome of the MPUC’s modification of its November 2016 order on the allocation of North Dakota investment tax credits. Net income in 2018 included an increase for the change in fair value of the contingent consideration liability of $1.3 million after-tax.



2018 Compared to 2017 (Continued)
Corporate and Other (Continued)

Net income at BNI Energy was $6.8 million in 2018 compared to $4.5 million in 2017. Net income in 2017 included a $3.1 million after-tax expense due to the remeasurement of deferred income tax assets and liabilities resulting from the TCJA. The net loss at ALLETE Properties was $0.5 million in 2018 compared to a $22.3net loss of $8.8 million after-tax non-cash impairment charge relating to the real estate assets of ALLETE Properties. (See Note 1. Operations and Significant Accounting Policies.) Also contributing to the decrease wasin 2017. The net loss in 2017 included a $3.0$7.8 million after-tax expense for acquisition costs related to the acquisitionremeasurement of U.S. Water Services. In 2015, results reflected slightly higher netdeferred income at BNI Energy.tax assets and liabilities resulting from the TCJA.


Income Taxes – Consolidated


For the year ended December 31, 2015,2018, the effective tax rate was 15.2a benefit of 9.8 percent (22.6(expense of 7.9 percent for the year ended December 31, 2014)2017). The decrease from the year ended December 31, 2014,2017 was primarily due to increased productionthe reduction of the federal income tax creditsrate from 35 percent to 21 percent enacted as part of the TCJA, the amortization of excess deferred income tax benefit resulting from the TCJA and lower pre-tax income in 2015 related to additional wind energy generation.2018, partially offset by the remeasurement of deferred income tax assets and liabilities resulting from the TCJA in 2017. The effective tax rate deviated from the combined statutory rate of approximately 4128 percent primarily due to production tax credits and the deduction for AFUDC–Equity.credits. (See Note 13.11. Income Tax Expense.)




Critical Accounting Policies


The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with GAAP requires management to make various estimates and assumptions that affect amounts reported in the Consolidated Financial Statements. These estimates and assumptions may be revised, which may have a material effect on the Consolidated Financial Statements. Actual results may differ from these estimates and assumptions. These policies are discussed with the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors on a regular basis. We believe the following policies are most critical to our business and the understanding of our results of operations.


Regulatory Accounting. Our regulated utility operations are accounted for in accordance with the accounting standards for the effects of certain types of regulation. These standards require us to reflect the effect of regulatory decisions in our financial statements. Regulatory assets represent incurred costs that have been deferred as they are probable for recovery in customer rates. Regulatory liabilities represent obligations to make refunds to customers and amounts collected in rates for which the related costs have not yet been incurred. The Company assesses quarterly whether regulatory assets and liabilities meet the criteria for probability of future recovery or deferral. This assessment considers factors such as, but not limited to, changes in the regulatory environment and recent rate orders to other regulated entities under the same jurisdiction. If future recovery or refund of costs becomes no longer probable, the assets and liabilities would be recognized in current period net income or other comprehensive income. (See Note 4. Regulatory Matters.)



Critical Accounting Policies (Continued)

Pension and Postretirement Health and Life Actuarial Assumptions. We account for our pension and other postretirement benefit obligations in accordance with the accounting standards for defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans. These standards require the use of several important assumptions, including the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets, the discount rate and mortality assumptions, among others, in determining our obligations and the annual cost of our pension and other postretirement benefits. In establishing the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets, we determine the long-term historical performance of each asset class and adjust these for current economic conditions and,while utilizing the target allocation of our plan assets to forecast the expected long-term rate of return. Our pension asset allocation as of December 31, 2016,2019, was approximately 4934 percent equity securities, 3962 percent debt, 7fixed income, 1 percent private equity and 53 percent real estate. Our postretirement health and life asset allocation as of December 31, 2016,2019, was approximately 6066 percent equity securities, 3433 percent debtfixed income and 61 percent private equity. Equity securities consist of a mix of market capitalization sizes with domestic and international securities. In 2016,2019, we used expected long-term rates of return of 8.007.25 percent in our actuarial determination of our pension expense and 6.405.80 percent to 8.007.25 percent in our actuarial determination of our other postretirement expense. The actuarial determination uses an asset smoothing methodology for actual returns to reduce the volatility of varying investment performance over time. We review our expected long-term rate of return assumption annually and will adjust it to respond to changing market conditions. As a result, we reduced our expected long-term rates of return for 2017 to 7.50 percent in our actuarial determination of our pension expense and 6.00 percent to 7.50 percent in our actuarial determination of our other postretirement expense. A one-quarterone‑quarter percent decrease in the expected long‑termlong-term rate of return would increase the annual expense for pension and other postretirement benefits by approximately $1.7$1.9 million, pre-tax.



Critical Accounting Policies (Continued)
Pension and Postretirement Health and Life Actuarial Assumptions (Continued)

The discount rate is computed using a bond matching study which utilizes a portfolio of high quality bonds that produce cash flows similar to the projected costs of our pension and other postretirement plans. In 20162019, we used discount rates of 4.724.39 percent to 4.53 percent and 4.734.47 percent in our actuarial determination of our pension and other postretirement expense, respectively. We review our discount rates annually and will adjust them to respond to changing market conditions. A one-quarter percent decrease in the discount rate would increase the annual expense for pension and other postretirement benefits by approximately $1.2$0.9 million, pre-tax.pre‑tax.


The mortality assumptions used to calculate our pension and other postretirement benefit obligations as of December 31, 2016,2019, considered a modified RP-2014PRI-2012 mortality table and mortality projection scale. (See Note 15.12. Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans.)


Impairment of Long-Lived Assets. We review our long-lived assets, which include the legacy real estate assets of ALLETE Properties, for indicators of impairment in accordance with the accounting standards for property, plant and equipment on a quarterly basis.


In accordance with the accounting standards for property, plant and equipment, if indicators of impairment exist, we test our long‑lived assets for recoverability by comparing the carrying amount of the asset to the undiscounted future net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. Cash flows are assessed at the lowest level of identifiable cash flows. The undiscounted future net cash flows are impacted by trends and factors known to us at the time they are calculated and our expectations related to: management’s best estimate of future sales prices; holding period and timing of sales; method of disposition; and future expenditures necessary to maintain the operations.


Real Estate Assets. In recent years, market conditions for real estate in Florida have required us to review our land inventories for impairment. In 2015, the Company reevaluated its strategy related to the real estate assets of ALLETE Properties in response to market conditions and transaction activity. The revised strategy incorporated the possibility of a bulk sale of its entire portfolio which, if consummated, would likely result in sales proceeds below the book value of the real estate assets. Proceeds from such a sale would be strategically deployed to support growth in our energy infrastructure and related services businesses. ALLETE Properties also continues to pursue sales of individual parcels over time. ALLETE Properties will continue to maintain key entitlements and infrastructure without making additional investments or acquisitions.

In connection with implementing the revised strategy, management evaluated its impairment analysis for its real estate assets using updated assumptions to determine estimated future net cash flows on an undiscounted basis. Estimated fair values were based upon current market data and pricing for individual parcels. Our impairment analysis incorporates a probability-weighted approach considering the alternative courses of sales noted above.



Critical Accounting Policies (Continued)
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets (Continued)

Based on the results of the 2015 undiscounted cash flow analysis, the undiscounted future net cash flows were not adequate to recover the carrying value of the real estate assets leading to an adjustment of carrying value to estimated fair value. Estimated fair value was derived using Level 3 inputs, including current market interest in the property for a bulk sale of its entire portfolio, and discounted cash flow analysis of estimated selling price for sales over time. As a result, a non-cash impairment charge of $36.3 million was recorded in 2015 to reduce the carrying value of the real estate to its estimated fair value.

In 2016 and 2014, impairment analyses of estimated undiscounted future net cash flows were conducted and indicated that the cash flows were adequate to recover the carrying value of ALLETE Properties real estate assets. As a result, no impairment was recorded in 2016 or 2014.
Taxation. We are required to make judgments regarding the potential tax effects of various financial transactions and our ongoing operations to estimate our obligations to taxing authorities. These tax obligations include income real estatetaxes and sales/usetaxes other than income taxes. Judgments related to income taxes require the recognition in our financial statements of the largest tax benefit of a tax position that is “more-likely-than-not” to be sustained on audit. Tax positions that do not meet the “more-likely-than-not” criteria are reflected as a tax liability in accordance with the accounting standards for uncertainty in income taxes. We record a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets to the extent it is more-likely-than-not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.


We are subject to income taxes in various jurisdictions. We make assumptions and judgments each reporting period to estimate our income tax assets, liabilities, benefits and expenses. Judgments and assumptions are supported by historical data and reasonable projections. Our assumptions and judgments include the application of tax statutes and regulations, and projections of future federal taxable income, state taxable income, and state apportionment to determine our ability to utilize NOL and credit carryforwards prior to their expiration. Significant changes in assumptions regarding future federal and state taxable income or a change in tax rates could require new or increased valuation allowances which could result in a material impact on our results of operations.


Valuation of Goodwill and Intangible Assets. When we acquire a business, the assets acquired and liabilities assumed are recorded at their respective fair values as of the acquisition date. Determining the fair value of intangible assets acquired as part of a business combination requires us to make significant estimates. These estimates include the amount and timing of projected future cash flows, the discount rate used to discount those cash flows to present value, the assessment of the asset’s life cycle, and the consideration of legal, technical, regulatory, economic and competitive risks. The fair value assigned to intangible assets is determined by estimating the future cash flows of each project and discounting the net cash flows back to their present values. The discount rate used is determined at the time of measurement in accordance with accepted valuation standards.

Goodwill. Goodwill is the excess of the purchase price (consideration transferred) over the estimated fair value of net assets of acquired businesses. In accordance with GAAP, goodwill is not amortized. The Company assesses whether there has been an impairment of goodwill annually in the fourth quarter and whenever an event occurs or circumstances change that would indicate the carrying amount may be impaired. Impairment testing for goodwill is done at the reporting unit level. An impairment loss is recognized when the carrying amount of the reporting unit’s net assets exceeds the estimated fair value of the reporting unit. The test for impairment requires us to make several estimates about fair value, most of which are based on projected future cash flows. Our estimates associated with the goodwill impairment test are considered critical due to the amount of goodwill recorded on our Consolidated Balance Sheet and the judgment required in determining fair value, including projected future cash flows. The results of our annual impairment test are discussed in Note 1. Operations and Significant Accounting Policies and Note 9. Fair Value in this Form 10-K. Goodwill was $131.2 million and $130.6 million as of December 31, 2016, and December 31, 2015, respectively.

Intangible Assets.Intangible assets include customer relationships, patents, non-compete agreements and trademarks and trade names. Intangible assets with definite lives consist of customer relationships, patents, and non-compete agreements, which are amortized on a straight-line or accelerated basis with estimated useful lives ranging from approximately 2 years to approximately 21 years. We review definite-lived intangible assets for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Indefinite-lived intangible assets consist of trademarks and trade names, which are tested for impairment annually in the fourth quarter and whenever an event occurs or circumstances change that would indicate that the carrying amount may be impaired. Impairment is calculated as the excess of the asset’s carrying amount over its fair value. Our impairment reviews are based on an estimated future cash flow approach that requires significant judgment with respect to future revenue and expense growth rates, selection of an appropriate discount rate, and other assumptions and estimates. We use estimates that are consistent with our business plans and a market participant view of the assets being evaluated. The results of our annual impairment test are discussed in Note 9. Fair Value in this Form 10-K. Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization, were $82.2 million and $84.6 million as of December 31, 2016, and December 31, 2015, respectively.


Outlook


ALLETE is an energy company committed to earning a financial return that rewards our shareholders, allows for reinvestment in our businesses and sustains growth. The Company has long-term objectives of achieving average annual earnings per share growth of a minimum of five5 percent to 7 percent, and providing a dividend payout competitive with our industry. Regulated Operations is projected to have average annual earnings growth of 4 percent to 5 percent. ALLETE Clean Energy and our Corporate and Other businesses are projected to have average annual earnings growth of at least 15 percent over the long-term.


ALLETE is predominately a regulated utility through Minnesota Power, SWL&P and an investment in ATC. ALLETE’s strategy is to remain predominately a regulated utility while investing in itsALLETE Clean Energy Infrastructure and Related Servicesour Corporate and Other businesses to complement its regulated businesses, balance exposure to the utility’s industrial customers and provide potential long-term earnings growth. ALLETE expects net income from Regulated Operations to be approximately 85 percent to 9080 percent of total consolidated net income in 2017.2020. Over the next several years, the contribution of theALLETE Clean Energy Infrastructure and Related Servicesour Corporate and Other businesses to net income is expected to increase as ALLETE grows these operations. ALLETE expects its businesses to provide regulated, contracted or recurring revenues, and to support sustained growth in net income and cash flow.


On March 26, 2019, the Company sold U.S. Water Services to a subsidiary of Kurita Water Industries Ltd. pursuant to a stock purchase agreement for approximately $270 million in cash, net of transaction costs and cash retained.


Outlook (Continued)

Regulated Operations. Minnesota Power’s long-term strategy is to be the leading electric energy provider in northeastern Minnesota by providing safe, reliable and cost-competitive electric energy, while complying with environmental permit conditions and renewable energy requirements. Keeping the cost of energy production competitive enables Minnesota Power to effectively compete in the wholesale power markets and minimizes retail rate increases to help maintain customer viability. As part of maintaining cost competitiveness, Minnesota Power intends to reduce its exposure to possible future carbon and GHG legislation by reshaping its generation portfolio, over time, to reduce its reliance on coal. (See EnergyForward.) We will monitor and review proposed environmental regulations and may challenge those that add considerable cost with limited environmental benefit. Minnesota Power will continue to pursue customer growth opportunities and cost recovery rider approvalapprovals for environmental,transmission, renewable and transmissionenvironmental investments, as well as work with regulators to earn a fair rate of return.


Regulatory Matters. Entities within our Regulated Operations segment are under the jurisdiction of the MPUC, FERC, PSCW and NDPSC. See Note 4. Regulatory Matters for discussion of regulatory matters within our Minnesota, FERC, Wisconsin and North Dakotathese jurisdictions.


2016 Minnesota General Rate Case. The MPUC issued a March 2018 order in Minnesota Power’s general rate case approving a return on common equity of 9.25 percent and a 53.81 percent equity ratio. Final rates went into effect in December 2018.

2020 Minnesota General Rate Case. On November 2, 2016,1, 2019, Minnesota Power filed a retail rate increase request with the MPUC seeking an average increase of approximately 910.6 percent for retail customers. The rate filing seeks a return on equity of 10.2510.05 percent and a 53.853.81 percent equity ratio. On an annualized basis, the requested final rate increase would generate approximately $55$66 million in additional revenue. On December 12, 2016, due to a change in its electric sales forecast, Minnesota Power filed a request to modify its original interim rate proposal reducing its requested interim rate increase to $34.7 million from the original request of approximately $49 million; Minnesota Power will file to update its final retail rate increase request by February 28, 2017, and expects the final retail rate increase request to decrease similar to the interim rate proposal. In orders dated December 30, 2016,23, 2019, the MPUC accepted the filing as complete and authorized an annual interim rate increase of $34.7$36.1 million beginning January 1, 2017. As part of this rate increase request, we are seeking an extension of the recovery period for Boswell to better reflect recent environmental investments at the facility and mitigate rate increases for our customers. If approved, annual depreciation expense will be reduced by approximately $25 million. If the requested recovery period extension is not approved, we would expect final rates to be increased by a similar amount. We cannot predict the level of final rates that may be authorized by the MPUC.2020.


20162018 Wisconsin General Rate Case.On June 28, 2016, SWL&P filedIn a December 2018 order, the PSCW approved a rate increase request with the PSCW requesting an average overall increase of 3.1 percent for retail customers (a 3.5 percent increase in electric rates,SWL&P including a 1.3 percent decrease in natural gas rates and a 7.8 percent increase in water rates). The rate filing seeks an overall return on equity of 10.910.4 percent and a 5555.0 percent equity ratio. On an annualized basis, the requested rate increase would generate approximately $2.7 millionFinal rates went into effect January 1, 2019, which resulted in additional revenue. Hearings are expected to be scheduledrevenue of approximately $3 million. SWL&P anticipates filing a general rate case in the first half of 2017. The Company anticipates new rates will take effect during the second quarter of 2017. We cannot predict the level of rates that may be approved by the PSCW.2020.


Industrial Customers and Prospective Additional Load


Industrial Customers. Electric power is one of several key inputs in the taconite mining, iron concentrate, paper, pulp and secondary wood products, pipeline and other industries. Approximately 4554 percent of our regulated utility kWh sales in 2016 (462019 (50 percent in 2015)2018 and 2017) were made to our industrial customers in these industries.customers. We expect industrial sales of approximately 7.0 million to 7.5 million MWh in 2017 (6.52020 (7.3 million MWh in 2016; 6.6 million MWh2019 and in 2015)2018). (See Item 1. Business – Regulated Operations – Electric Sales / Customers.)



Outlook (Continued)
Industrial Customers and Prospective Additional Load (Continued)

Taconite and Iron Concentrate. Minnesota Power provides electric service to sixPower’s taconite facilitiescustomers are capable of producing up to approximately 41 million tons of taconite pellets annually. Taconite pellets produced in Minnesota are primarily shipped to North American steel making facilities that are part of the integrated steel industry. Steel produced from these North American facilities is used primarily in the manufacture of automobiles, appliances, pipe and tube products for the gas and oil industry, and in the construction industry. Historically, less than five10 percent of Minnesota taconite production ishas been exported outside of North America. Minnesota Power also provides electric service to three iron concentrate facilities capable of producing up to approximately 4 million tons of iron concentrate per year. Iron concentrate is used in the production of taconite pellets. These iron concentrate facilities are owned in whole, or in part, by Magnetation and are not currently operating. (See Magnetation.)


There has been a general historical correlation between U.S. steel production and Minnesota taconite production. The American Iron and Steel Institute, an association of North American steel producers, reported that U.S. raw steel production operated at approximately 7180 percent of capacity in 2016 (712019 (78 percent in 20152018 and 7774 percent in 2014)2017). Many steel producers reduced production in 2015, citing higher levels of imports and lower prices. Some Minnesota taconite and iron concentrate producers reduced production in 2015 in response to declining U.S. steel production. There is a natural lag between U.S. steel consumption and Minnesota taconite production. The high level of imports and lower prices in 2015 continued to impact Minnesota taconite production with an estimated 28 million tons of taconite produced by Minnesota Power’s taconite customers during 2016 (31 million tons in 2015; 39 million tons in 2014). In 2015, petitions regarding unfairly traded cold-rolled, hot-rolled and corrosion-resistant steel products were filed by domestic steel producers with the U.S. Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission resulting in countervailing duty and antidumping investigations. In 2016, the U.S. Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission made final affirmative determinations concluding the investigations. As a result of the affirmative determinations, cash deposits are collected on these products when imported from certain countries. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, 2016 annual imports for consumption of steel products were down approximately 15 percent compared to 2015 annual imports. The World Steel Association, an association of over 160 steel producers, national and regional steel industry associations, and steel research institutes representing approximately 85 percent of world steel production, projected U.S. steel consumption in 20172020 will increase by approximately 3one percent compared to 2016.2019.


Minnesota Power’s taconite customers may experience annual variations in production levels due to such factors as economic conditions, short-term demand changes or maintenance outages. We estimate that a one million ton change in Minnesota Power’s taconite customers’ production would impact our annual earnings per share by approximately $0.03,$0.04, net of expected power marketing sales at current prices. Changes in wholesale electric prices or customer contractual demand nominations could impact this estimate. Minnesota Power proactively sells power in the wholesale power markets that is temporarily not required by industrial customers to optimize the value of its generating facilities. Long-term reductions in taconite production or a permanent shut down of a taconite customer may lead Minnesota Power to file a general rate case to recover lost revenue.

USS Corporation. In the second quarter of 2015, USS Corporation temporarily idled its Minnesota Ore Operations - Keetac plant in Keewatin, Minnesota, and a portion of its Minnesota Ore Operations - Minntac plant in Mountain Iron, Minnesota. These actions were due to high inventory levels and ongoing adjustment of its steel producing operations throughout North America. Global influences in the market, including a higher level of imports, unfairly traded products and reduced steel prices, were cited as having an impact. In the third quarter of 2015, USS Corporation returned its Minntac plant to full production. On December 29, 2016, USS Corporation announced its Keetac plant is expected to restart production in March 2017. Both facilities are Large Power Customers of Minnesota Power. USS Corporation has the capability to produce approximately 5 million tons and 15 million tons of taconite annually at its Keetac and Minntac plants, respectively. On September 30, 2016, Minnesota Power extended its electric service agreement with USS Corporation through 2021 at USS Corporation’s Minntac and Keetac plants, which was approved by the MPUC in an order dated December 29, 2016.

Magnetation. In May 2015, Magnetation announced that it had filed voluntary petitions for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Minnesota, citing the significant decrease in global iron ore prices and its existing capital structure. In January 2016, Magnetation idled its Plant 2 facility in Bovey, Minnesota. On October 6, 2016, the bankruptcy court approved plans to idle Magnetation’s Plant 4 facility near Grand Rapids, Minnesota, and its pellet plant in Reynolds, Indiana, as well as terminate Magnetation’s pellet purchase agreement with AK Steel Corporation. The company subsequently idled the facilities and stated it was preserving the plants and their value for a potential buyer. On January 30, 2017, ERP Iron Ore, LLC purchased substantially all of Magnetation’s assets pursuant to an asset purchase agreement approved by the bankruptcy court. Although we cannot predict whether the facilities will be restarted, Minnesota Power will serve the Plant 2 and Plant 4 facilities through the buyer’s assumption of the existing electric service agreement with Magnetation.



Outlook (Continued)
Industrial Customers and Prospective Additional Load (Continued)


United TaconiteUSS Corporation. In August 2016, Cliffs restarted operationsOn October 17, 2019, USS Corporation announced that it had idled one of its pellet production lines at its United TaconiteMinnesota Ore Operations - Minntac plant in Eveleth,Mountain Iron, Minnesota, which had been idled since August 2015, followingciting changing market conditions and the announcementsneed to adjust its raw materials accordingly. USS Corporation also noted it plans to perform additional maintenance during this time in preparation for improved market conditions and does not anticipate any employment impacts.

Northshore Mining. Cliffs has announced that it has made an approximately $90 million investment in its Minnesota ore operations to expand capacity for producing direct reduced-grade pellets at Northshore Mining. Cliffs is currently constructing a hot briquetted iron production plant in Toledo, Ohio, and has begun shipping direct reduced-grade pellets to the Toledo plant in anticipation of Cliffs’ 10-year supply agreement with a major steel customer and additional business contracted with another customerthe planned start of operations in June 2016. Cliffs also held a ground breaking ceremony at United Taconite in August 2016 to commence construction on its approximately $65 million project to produce a fully fluxed taconite pellet. That new product will replace a flux pellet made at Cliffs’ indefinitely idled Empire operation in Michigan. United Taconite has the capability to produce approximately 5 million tons of taconite annually. On May 23, 2016,mid-2020. Minnesota Power extended its electric service agreement with Cliffs for 10 years at Cliffs’ United Taconite and Babbitt facilities, which was approved by the MPUC in an order dated November 9, 2016.

Silver Bay Power. On May 23, 2016, Minnesota Power entered into multiple agreements with Cliffs and its subsidiaries. Under one of the agreements, Minnesota Power paid $31.0 million in cash as part ofhas a long-term PSA through 2031 between Minnesota Power andwith Silver Bay Power. Silver Bay Power, which provides the majority of the electric service requirements for Northshore Mining. (See Silver Bay Power.)

Silver Bay Power. In 2016, Minnesota Power and Silver Bay Power entered into a PSA through 2031. Silver Bay Power supplies approximately 90 MW of load to Northshore Mining, an affiliate of Silver Bay Power, which hashad previously been served predominately through self-generation by Silver Bay Power. Starting in 2016, Minnesota Power supplied Silver Bay Power with at least 50 MW of energy and Silver Bay Power had the capabilityoption to produce approximately 6 million tonspurchase additional energy from Minnesota Power as it transitioned away from self-generation. In the third quarter of taconite annually. (See Note 11. Commitments, Guarantees2019, Silver Bay Power ceased self-generation and Contingencies.)Minnesota Power began supplying the full energy requirements for Silver Bay Power.


Paper, Pulp and Secondary Wood Products. In additionThe North American paper and pulp industry faces declining demand due to serving the taconite industry, Minnesota Power servesimpact of electronic substitution for print and changing customer needs. As a number ofresult, certain paper and pulp customers have reduced their existing operations in recent years and have pursued or are pursuing product changes in response to the paper, pulp and secondary wood products industry. Thedeclining demand. We expect operating levels in 2020 at the four major paper and pulp mills we serve reportedto be similar to 2019.

Pipeline and Other Industries.

Husky Energy.In April 2018, a fire at Husky Energy’s refinery in Superior, Wisconsin, disrupted operations at the facility. Under normal operating conditions, SWL&P provides approximately 14 MW of average monthly demand to Husky Energy in addition to water service. On September 30, 2019, Husky Energy announced that it had received the required permit approvals to begin reconstruction. The facility remains at or near, full capacity in 2016,minimal operations, and similar levels arethe refinery is not expected in 2017.to resume normal operations until 2021.


Prospective Additional Load.Minnesota Power is pursuing new wholesale and retail loads in and around its service territory. Currently, several companies in northeastern Minnesota continue to progress in the development of natural resource-based projects that represent long-term growth potential and load diversity for Minnesota Power. We cannot predict the outcome of these projects.


Nashwauk Public Utilities Commission. Mesabi Metallics, which changed its name from Essar Steel Minnesota LLC in December 2016, is a retail customer of the Nashwauk Public Utilities Commission, and Minnesota Power has a wholesale electric sales agreement with the Nashwauk Public Utilities Commission for electric service through at least June 2028. Mesabi Metallics also makes ongoing payments to Minnesota Power for electric transmission infrastructure costs. Mesabi Metallics filed for bankruptcy protection on July 8, 2016, under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware. In its filings, Mesabi Metallics stated that it has arranged funding sources and intends to continue its project in Minnesota post-bankruptcy. Mesabi Metallics’ pre-petition debt to Minnesota Power is not material.

On September 8, 2016, the bankruptcy court approved an agreement that continued Mesabi Metallics’ obligation under its agreements with the Nashwauk Public Utilities Commission and Minnesota Power through at least March 31, 2017. This allowed Minnesota Power to draw down Mesabi Metallics’ cash deposit account to satisfy Mesabi Metallics’ commitments to Minnesota Power and the Nashwauk Public Utilities Commission in full through December 2016, and in part through March 31, 2017, at which point Mesabi Metallics will propose to reject, assume or modify the agreements with the Nashwauk Public Utilities Commission and Minnesota Power.

PolyMet. Minnesota Power has a long-term contract with PolyMet which is planning to start a new copper-nickel and precious metal (non-ferrous) mining operation in northeastern Minnesota. In November 2015, PolyMet announced the completion of the final EIS by state and federal agencies, which was subsequently published in the Federal Register and Minnesota Environmental Quality Board Monitor. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers have both issued its Recordfinal Records of Decision, on March 3, 2016, finding the final EIS adequate. The 30-day period allowed by law to challenge the Record of Decision passed without any legal challenges being filed. On July 11,

In 2016, PolyMet submitted applications for water-related permits with the State of Minnesota,DNR and on August 24, 2016, an application forMPCA, an air quality permit was submitted towith the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. On November 3, 2016, PolyMet submittedMPCA, and a state permit to mine application towith the DNR detailing its operational plans for the mine. The final EIS also requires Records of Decision by the federal agencies, which are expected in 2017, before final action can be taken on the required federal permits to construct and operate the mining operation. On January 9, 2017,In June 2018, the U.S. Forest Service signed the Final Record of Decision authorizingand PolyMet closed on a land exchange, with PolyMet, which upon completion of title transfer will resultresulted in PolyMet obtaining surface rights to land needed to develop its mining operation. In November 2018, the DNR issued PolyMet’s permit to mine and certain water-related permits. In December 2018, the MPCA issued PolyMet’s final state water and air quality permits. On March 21, 2019, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers issued PolyMet’s final federal permit. PolyMet was issued all necessary permits to construct and operate its new mining operation; however, on January 13, 2020, the Minnesota Court of Appeals reversed the DNR’s decisions granting PolyMet’s permit to mine and dam-safety permits, and remanded them back to the DNR to hold a contested-case hearing. On February 11, 2020, PolyMet announced it has filed a petition for further review with the Minnesota Supreme Court seeking to overturn the Minnesota Court of Appeals decision. Minnesota Power could supply between 45 MW and 50 MW of load under a ten-year10‑year power supply contract with PolyMet that would begin upon start-up of the mining operations.






Outlook (Continued)

EnergyForward. In 2013, Minnesota Power announced is executing EnergyForward, a strategic plan for assuring reliability, protecting affordability and further improving environmental performance. The plan includes completed and planned investments in wind, solar, natural gas and hydroelectric power, the additionconstruction of natural gas as a generation fuel source, andadditional transmission capacity, the installation of emissions control technology. Significant elementstechnology and the idling of the EnergyForward plan include:certain coal-fired generating facilities.


Major wind investments in North Dakota. Bison added 205 MW of capacity in 2014, bringing total capacity to 497 MW. (See Renewable Energy.)
The installation of emissions control technology at Boswell Unit 4 completed in December 2015 to further reduce emissions of SO2, particulates and mercury.
Planning for the proposed GNTL to deliver hydroelectric power from northern Manitoba by 2020. (See Transmission.)
The conversion of Laskin from coal to cleaner-burning natural gas which was completed in June 2015.
Retirement of Taconite Harbor Unit 3, one of three coal-fired units at Taconite Harbor, which was retired in May 2015.

In July 2015,2017, Minnesota Power announced the next steps in its EnergyForward plan, which will reduce carbon emissions, increase the use of renewable resources and add natural gassubmitted a resource package to meet customer electric service needs in a balanced, reliable and cost-effective way. Significant additional elements of the plan include:

Economic idling of Taconite Harbor Units 1 and 2 which occurred in September 2016 and the ceasing of coal-fired operations there in 2020.
Adding between 200 MW and 300 MW of cleaner and flexible natural gas-fired generation to Minnesota Power’s portfolio within the next decade.
Building both large and small scale solar generation.
Expanding the potential for additional energy efficiency savings.

Integrated Resource Plan (IRP). In September 2015, Minnesota Power filed its 2015 IRP with the MPUC which contained the next steps in its EnergyForward strategic plan, and included an analysisrequesting approval of a varietyPPA for the output of existing and futurea 250 MW wind energy resource alternativesfacility (see Nobles 2 PPA) as well as approval of a 250 MW natural gas capacity dedication agreement. The natural gas capacity dedication agreement was subject to MPUC approval of the construction of NTEC, a 525 MW to 625 MW combined-cycle natural gas‑fired generating facility which will be jointly owned by Dairyland Power Cooperative and a projectionsubsidiary of customer cost impact by class.ALLETE. Minnesota Power would purchase approximately 50 percent of the facility's output starting in 2025. In an order dated July 18,January 24, 2019, the MPUC approved Minnesota Power’s request for approval of the NTEC natural gas capacity dedication agreement. Separately, the MPUC required a baseload retirement evaluation in Minnesota Power’s next IRP filing analyzing its existing fleet including potential early retirement scenarios of Boswell Units 3 and 4, as well as a securitization plan. On December 23, 2019, the Minnesota Court of Appeals reversed and remanded the MPUC’s decision to approve certain affiliated-interest agreements. The MPUC was ordered to determine whether NTEC may have the potential for significant environmental effects and, if so, to prepare an environmental assessment worksheet before reassessing the agreements. On January 22, 2020, Minnesota Power filed a petition for further review with the Minnesota Supreme Court requesting that it review and overturn the Minnesota Court of Appeals decision. On January 8, 2019, an application for a certificate of public convenience and necessity for NTEC was submitted to the PSCW, which was approved by the PSCW at a hearing on January 16, 2020. Construction of NTEC is subject to obtaining additional permits from local, state and federal authorities. The total project cost is estimated to be approximately $700 million, of which ALLETE’s portion is expected to be approximately $350 million. ALLETE’s portion of NTEC project costs incurred through December 31, 2019, is approximately $12 million.

Integrated Resource Plan. In a 2016 order, the MPUC approved Minnesota Power’s 2015 IRP with modifications. The order acceptsaccepted Minnesota Power’s plans for the economic idling of Taconite Harbor directsUnits 1 and 2 and the ceasing of coal-fired operations at Taconite Harbor in 2020, directed Minnesota Power to retire Boswell Units 1 and 2 no later than 2022, requiresrequired an analysis of generation and demand response alternatives to be filed with a natural gas resource proposal, and requiresrequired Minnesota Power to conduct requestrequests for proposalsproposal for additional wind, solar and demand response resource additions subject to further MPUC approvals. On October 19, 2016,additions. Minnesota Power announced thatretired Boswell Units 1 and 2 will be retired in 2018 as the latest step in its EnergyForward strategic plan.fourth quarter of 2018. Minnesota Power’s next IRP must be filed by Februaryfiling is due October 1, 2018.2020. (See Note 4. Regulatory Matters.)


Renewable Energy. Minnesota Power’s 2015 IRP includes an update on its plans and progress in meeting the Minnesota renewable energy milestones through 2025. Minnesota Power continues to execute its renewable energy strategy through key renewable projects that will ensure it meets the identified state mandate at the lowest cost for customers. Minnesota Power has exceeded the interim milestone requirements to date and expects 29between 25 percent and 30 percent of its applicable retail and municipal energy sales will be supplied by renewable energy sources in 2017.2020. (See Item 1. Business – Regulated Operations – Minnesota Legislation and EnergyForward.)


Minnesota Solar Energy Standard. In 2013, legislation was enacted by the state of Minnesota requiring at least 1.5Power continues to execute its renewable energy strategy and expects approximately 50 percent of total retail electric sales, excluding sales to certain customers, toits energy will be generatedsupplied by renewable energy sources by 2021.

Solar Energy. Minnesota Power’s solar energy by the endsupply consists of 2020. At least 10 percent of the 1.5 percent mandate must be met by solar energy generated by or procured from solar photovoltaic devices with a nameplate capacity of 20 kW or less. Minnesota Power has one completed solar project and another under development. In August 2015, Minnesota Power filed for MPUC approval ofCamp Ripley, a 10 MW utility scale solar projectenergy facility at the Camp Ripley Minnesota Army National Guard base and training facility near Little Falls, Minnesota. In an order dated February 24, 2016, the MPUC approved the Camp Ripley solar project as eligible to meet the solar energy standardMinnesota, and for current cost recovery, which was subsequently finalized by the MPUC in an order dated December 12, 2016. The Camp Ripley solar project was completed in the fourth quarter of 2016. In September 2015, Minnesota Power filed for MPUC approval of a community solar garden project in northeastern Minnesota, which is comprised of a 1 MW solar array to be owned and operated by a third party with the output purchased by Minnesota Power and a 40 kW solar array that will beis owned and operated by Minnesota Power. In an order dated July 27, 2016, the MPUC approved the community solar garden project and cost recovery, subject to certain compliance requirements. Minnesota Power believes these projects will meet approximately one-third of the overall mandate. Additionally, on January 19, 2017, the MPUC approved Minnesota Power’s proposal to increase the amount of solar rebates available for customer-sited solar installations and recover costs of the program through Minnesota Power’s renewable cost recovery rider. This proposal to incentivize customer-sited solar installations is expected to meet a portion of the required mandate related to solar photovoltaic devices with a nameplate capacity of 20 kW or less.


Outlook (Continued)
EnergyForward (Continued)


Minnesota Power has approval for current cost recovery of investments and expenditures related to compliance with the Minnesota Solar Energy Standard. Currently, there is no approved customer billing rate for solar costs, but Minnesota Power expects to file its first solar factor filing in 2017 for recovery of costs related to the Camp Ripley solar project and community solar garden project.costs.


Wind Energy. Minnesota Power’s wind energy facilities consist of Bison (497 MW) located in North Dakota, and Taconite Ridge (25 MW) located in northeastern Minnesota. Minnesota Power also has two long-term wind energy PPAs with an affiliate of NextEra Energy, Inc. to purchase the output from Oliver Wind I (50 MW) and Oliver Wind II (48 MW) located in North Dakota.


Outlook (Continued)
EnergyForward (Continued)

Minnesota Power uses the 465-mile, 250-kV DC transmission line that runs from Center, North Dakota, to Duluth, Minnesota, to transport increasing amounts of wind energy from North Dakota while gradually phasing out coal-based electricity delivered to its system over this transmission line from Square Butte’s lignite coal-fired generating unit. TheMinnesota Power is currently pursuing a modernization and capacity upgrade of its DC transmission line capacity can be increased if renewable energy or transmission needs justify investmentssystem to upgrade the line.continue providing reliable operations and additional system capabilities.


Updated customer billing rates for the renewableMinnesota Power has an approved cost recovery rider which includesfor certain renewable investments and expenditures related to Bison, were approved by the MPUC in an order dated December 21, 2016, whichexpenditures. The cost recovery rider allows Minnesota Power to charge retail customers on a current basis for the costs of constructing certain renewable investments plus a return on the capital invested. The approval is on a provisional basis pendingUpdated customer billing rates for the outcome of Minnesota Power’s 2016 general rate case.

In an order dated November 30, 2016,renewable cost recovery rider were provisionally approved by the MPUC directedin a November 2018 order.

Nobles 2 PPA. In the third quarter of 2018, Minnesota Power and Nobles 2 signed an amended long-term PPA that provides for Minnesota Power to attribute all North Dakota investment tax credits realizedpurchase the energy and associated capacity from Bison toa 250 MW wind energy facility in southwestern Minnesota Power regulated retail customers. Asfor a result20-year period beginning in 2020. The agreement provides for the purchase of output from the adverse regulatory outcome, Minnesota Power has created a regulatory liability,facility at fixed energy prices. There are no fixed capacity charges, and recorded a reduction in operating revenue for $15.0 million. The North Dakota investment tax credits previously recognized as income tax credits in Corporate and Other were reversed in 2016 resulting in an $8.8 million charge to net income. On December 20, 2016, Minnesota Power submitted a request for reconsideration with the MPUC. On February 9, 2017, the MPUC decided to reconsider its November 30, 2016 order and will be requesting further comments. Minnesota Power will provide further support on its position.only pay for energy as it is delivered. This agreement is subject to construction of the wind energy facility. (See Note 5. Equity Investments.)


Prior to the November 30, 2016, MPUC order, Minnesota Power accounted for North Dakota investment tax credits based on the long-standing regulatory precedents of stand-alone allocation methodology of accounting for income taxes. The stand-alone method provides that income taxes (and credits) are calculated as if Minnesota Power was the only entity included in ALLETE’s consolidated federal and unitary state income tax returns. Minnesota Power had recorded a regulatory liability for North Dakota investment tax credits generated by its jurisdictional activity and expected to be realized in the future. North Dakota investment tax credits attributable to ALLETE’s apportionment and income of ALLETE’s other subsidiaries were included in the ALLETE consolidated group.

Manitoba Hydro. Minnesota Power has five long-term PPAs with Manitoba Hydro. The first PPA expires in May 2020. Under this agreement, Minnesota Power is purchasing 50 MW of capacity and the energy associated with that capacity. Both the capacity price and the energy price are adjusted annually by the change in a governmental inflationary index. Under the second PPA, Minnesota Power is purchasing surplus energy through April 2022. This energy-only agreement primarily consists of surplus hydro energy on Manitoba Hydro’s system that is delivered to Minnesota Power on a non-firm basis. The pricing is based on forward market prices. Under this agreement, Minnesota Power will purchase at least one million MWh of energy over the contract term.


In 2011, Minnesota Power and Manitoba Hydro signed aThe third PPA. This PPA provides for Minnesota Power to purchase 250 MW of capacity and energy from Manitoba Hydro for 15 years beginning in 2020. The agreementPPA is subject to the construction of additional transmission capacity between Manitobathe GNTL and the U.S., along with construction of new hydroelectric generating capacity in Manitoba. In September 2015, Manitoba Hydro submitted the final preferred routeMMTP. (See Note 9. Commitments, Guarantees and EIS for the additional transmission capacity in Canada to the Manitoba Conservation and Water Stewardship for regulatory approval. Construction of Manitoba Hydro’s hydroelectric generation facility commenced in 2014.Contingencies.) The capacity price is adjusted annually until 2020 by the change in a governmental inflationary index. The energy price is based on a formula that includes an annual fixed price component adjusted for the change in a governmental inflationary index and a natural gas index, as well as market prices.



Outlook (Continued)
EnergyForward (Continued)

In 2014, Minnesota Power and Manitoba Hydro signed aThe fourth PPA that provides for Minnesota Power to purchase up to 133 MW of energy from Manitoba Hydro for 20 years beginning in 2020. The pricing under this PPA is based on forward market prices. The PPA is subject to the construction of the GNTL.GNTL and MMTP. (See Item 1. Business – Regulated Operations – TransmissionNote 9. Commitments, Guarantees and Distribution – Great Northern Transmission Line.Contingencies.)


In October 2015, Minnesota Power and Manitoba Hydro signed aThe fifth PPA that provides for Minnesota Power to purchase 50 MW of capacity from Manitoba Hydro at fixed prices. The PPA beginsbegan in June 2017 and expires in May 2020.


Transmission. We continue to make investments in transmission opportunities that strengthen or enhance the transmission grid or take advantage of our geographical location between sources of renewable energy and end users. These include the GNTL, investments to enhance our own transmission facilities, investments in other transmission assets (individually or in combination with others), and our investment in ATC. See also Item 1. Business – Regulated Operations.Operations and Note 9. Commitments, Guarantees and Contingencies.


Energy Infrastructure and Related Services.



Outlook (Continued)

ALLETE Clean Energy.

ALLETE Clean Energy focuses on developing, acquiring, and operating clean and renewable energy projects. ALLETE Clean Energy currently owns and operates, in four states, approximately 535 MW of nameplate capacity wind energy generation that is from PSAs under various durations. In addition, ALLETE Clean Energy constructed and sold a 107 MW wind energy facility in 2015. On January 3, 2017, ALLETE Clean Energy announced that it will develop another wind energy facility of up to 50 MW after securing a 25‑year PSA. The PSA includes an option for the counterparty to purchase the facility upon development completion; construction is expected to begin in 2018.

ALLETE Clean Energy believes the market for renewable energy in North America is robust, driven by several factors including environmental regulation, tax incentives, societal expectations and continual technology advances. State renewable portfolio standards and state or federal regulations to limit GHG emissions are examples of environmental regulation or public policy that we believe will drive renewable energy development.

ALLETE Clean Energy’s strategy includes the safe, reliable, optimal and profitable operation of its existing facilities. This includes a strong safety culture, the continuous pursuit of operational efficiencies at existing facilities and cost controls. ALLETE Clean Energy generally acquires facilities in liquid power markets and its strategy includes the exploration of PSA extensions upon expiration of existing contracts.


ALLETE Clean Energy will pursue growth through acquisitions or project development for others.development. ALLETE Clean Energy is targeting acquisitions of existing facilities up to 200 MW each, which have long-term PSAs in place for the facilities’ output. At this time, ALLETE Clean Energy expects acquisitions or development of new facilities will be primarily wind or solar facilities in North America. ALLETE Clean Energy is also targeting the development of new facilities up to 200 MW each, which will have long-termlong‑term PSAs in place for the output or may be sold upon completion.

Federal production tax credit qualification is important to the economics of project development, project economics, and in 2016, 2017 and 2018 ALLETE Clean Energy invested approximately $100 million in equipment in 2016 to meet production tax credit safe harbor provisions.provisions which provides an opportunity to seek development of up to approximately 1,500 MW of production tax credit qualified wind projects through 2022. ALLETE Clean Energy will also invest approximately $80 million through 2020 for production tax credit requalification of up to approximately 500 WTGs at its Storm Lake I, Storm Lake II, Lake Benton and Condon wind energy facilities. We anticipate annual production tax credits relating to these projects of approximately $20 million in 2020, $17 million to $22 million annually in 2021 through 2027 and decreasing thereafter through 2030.



In 2017, ALLETE Clean Energy announced it will build, own and operate a 100 MW wind energy facility pursuant to a 20-year PSA with Northern States Power; construction was completed and tax equity funding was received in the fourth quarter of 2019. In March 2018, ALLETE Clean Energy announced that it will build, own and operate an 80 MW wind energy facility pursuant to a 15-year PSA with NorthWestern Corporation; construction is expected to be completed in the first quarter of 2020.
Outlook (Continued)
On May 3, 2019, ALLETE Clean Energy acquired the Diamond Spring wind project in Oklahoma from Apex Clean Energy. ALLETE Clean Energy will build, own and operate the approximately 300 MW wind energy facility. The Diamond Spring wind project is fully contracted to sell wind power under long-term power sales agreements. Construction is expected to be completed in late 2020.

ALLETE Clean Energy (Continued)

ALLETE Clean Energy will managemanages risk by having a diverse portfolio of assets, which will includeincludes PSA expiration, technology and geographic diversity. The current operating portfolio of approximately 660 MW is subject to typical variations in seasonal wind with higher wind resources typically available in the winter months. The majority of its planned maintenance leverages this seasonality and is performed during lower wind periods. The current mix of PSA expiration and geographic location for existing facilities is as follows:
Wind Energy FacilityLocationCapacity MWPSA MWPSA ExpirationLocationCapacity MWPSA MWPSA Expiration
Armenia MountainPennsylvania100.5100%2024East101100%2024
Chanarambie/VikingMinnesota97.5 Midwest98 
PSA 1 12%2018
PSA 1 (a)
 12%2023
PSA 2 88%2023 88%2023
CondonOregon50100%2022West50100%2022
Glen UllinWest106100%2039
Lake BentonMinnesota104100%2028Midwest104100%2028
Storm Lake IIowa108100%2019Midwest108100%2027
Storm Lake IIIowa77 Midwest77 
PSA 1 90%2019 90%2020
PSA 2 10%2032 10%2032
OtherMidwest17100%2028
(a)The PSA expiration assumes the exercise of four one-year renewal options that ALLETE Clean Energy has the sole right to exercise.


Non-cash amortization to revenue recognized by ALLETE Clean Energy relates to the amortization of differences between contract prices and estimated market prices on assumed PSAs. As part of wind energy facility acquisitions, ALLETE Clean Energy assumed various PSAs that were above or below estimated market prices at the time of acquisition; the resulting differences between contract prices and estimated market prices are amortized to revenue over the remaining PSA term. Non-cash amortization is expected to be approximately $11.5 million annually in 2020 through 2023, $5.5 million annually in 2024 through 2027, and decreasing thereafter through 2032.

U.S. Water Services.



In February 2015, ALLETE acquired U.S. Water Services. U.S. Water Services provides integrated water management for industry by combining chemical, equipment, engineering and service for customized solutions to reduce water and energy usage and improve efficiency. U.S. Water Services is located in 49 states and Canada, and has an established base of approximately 4,800 customers. U.S. Water Services differentiates itself from the competition by developing synergies between established solutions in engineering, equipment and chemical water treatment, and helping customers achieve efficient and sustainable use of their water and energy systems. U.S. Water Services is a leading provider to the biofuels industry, and also serves the food and beverage, industrial, power generation, and midstream oil and gas industries. U.S. Water Services principally relies upon recurring revenues from a diverse mix of industrial customers. U.S. Water Services sells certain products which are seasonal in nature, with higher demand typically realized in warmer months; generally, lower sales occur in the first quarter of each year.Outlook (Continued)

Our strategy is to grow U.S. Water Services’ North American presence by adding customers, products and new geographies. We believe water scarcity and a growing emphasis on conservation will continue to drive significant growth in the industrial, commercial and governmental sectors leading to organic revenue growth for U.S. Water Services. U.S. Water Services also expects to pursue periodic strategic tuck-in acquisitions with a purchase price in the $10 million to $50 million range. Priority will be given to acquisitions which expand its geographic reach, add new technology, or deepen its capabilities to serve its expanding customer base.


Corporate and Other.


BNI Energy.In 2016,2019, BNI Energy sold 3.84.1 million tons of coal (4.3 million tons in 2015)2018) and anticipates 20172020 sales will be higher than 2016 primarily due to an unexpected outage at Square Butte2019 reflecting no major planned customer outages anticipated in 2016.2020. BNI Energy operates under cost-plus fixed fee agreements extending through December 31, 2037.


Investment in Nobles 2.In December 2018, our wholly-owned subsidiary, ALLETE South Wind, entered into an agreement with Tenaska to purchase a 49 percent equity interest in Nobles 2, the entity that will own and operate a 250 MW wind energy facility in southwestern Minnesota pursuant to a 20-year PPA with Minnesota Power. The wind energy facility will be built in Nobles County, Minnesota and is expected to be completed in late 2020, with an estimated total project cost of approximately $350 million to $400 million. In the fourth quarter of 2019, we entered into a tax equity funding agreement to finance up to $125 million of the project costs. We account for our investment in Nobles 2 under the equity method of accounting. (See Note 5. Equity Investments.)

ALLETE Properties.Our strategy incorporates the possibility of a bulk sale of the entire ALLETE Properties representsportfolio. Proceeds from a bulk sale would be strategically deployed to support growth initiatives at our legacy Florida real estate investment.Regulated Operations and ALLETE Clean Energy. ALLETE Properties also continues to pursue sales of individual parcels over time and will continue to maintain key entitlements and infrastructure. Market conditions can impact land sales and could result in our inability to cover our cost basis and operating expenses orincluding fixed carrying costs such as community development district assessments and property taxes. ALLETE Properties’ major projects in Florida are Town Center at Palm Coast and Palm Coast Park, with approximately 4,100 acres combined of land available-for-sale. (See Item 1. Business – Corporate and Other – ALLETE Properties.) In addition to these two projects, ALLETE Properties has approximately 1,100 acres of other land available-for-sale.


In recent years, market conditions for real estate in Florida have required us to review our land inventories for impairment. In 2015, the Company reevaluated its strategy related to the real estate assets of ALLETE Properties in response to market conditions and transaction activity. Proceeds will be strategically deployed to support growth in our energy infrastructure and related services businesses. ALLETE Properties also continues to pursue sales of individual parcels over time. ALLETE Properties will continue to maintain key entitlements and infrastructure without making additional investments or acquisitions.


Income Taxes


Outlook (Continued)

Income Taxes. ALLETE’s aggregate federal and multi-state statutory tax rate is approximately 4128 percent for 2016. On an ongoing basis,2019. ALLETE also has tax credits and other tax adjustments that reduce the combined statutory rate to the effective tax rate. These tax credits and adjustments historically have included items such as investment tax credits, production tax credits, AFUDC-Equity,AFUDC‑Equity, depletion, as well as other items. The annual effective rate can also be impacted by such items as changes in income before non-controlling interest and income taxes, state and federal tax law changes that become effective during the year, business combinations, tax planning initiatives and resolution of prior years’ tax matters. We expect our effective tax rate to be a benefit of approximately 15 percent to 20 percent for 20172020 primarily due to federal production tax credits as a result of wind energy generation. We also expect that our effective tax rate will be lower than the combined statutory rate over the next eight11 years due to production tax credits attributable to our wind energy generation.




Liquidity and Capital Resources


Liquidity Position. ALLETE is well-positioned to meet its liquidity needs. As of December 31, 2016,2019, we had cash and cash equivalents of $27.5$69.3 million, $397.9$345.0 million in available consolidated lines of credit and a debt-to-capital ratio of 4541 percent.


On March 26, 2019, the Company sold U.S. Water Services to a subsidiary of Kurita Water Industries Ltd. pursuant to a stock purchase agreement for approximately $270 million in cash, net of transaction costs and cash retained.

Capital Structure. ALLETE’s capital structure for each of the last three years is as follows:
As of December 312016
       %2015
       %2014
       %2019
       %2018
       %2017
       %
Millions            
ALLETE Equity
$1,893.0
55
$1,820.2
53
$1,609.4
54
$2,231.9
56
$2,155.8
59
$2,068.2
58
Non-Controlling Interest
2.2
1.8
103.7
3

Long-Term Debt (Including Current Maturities)1,569.1
451,605.0
471,373.5
46
Notes Payable
1.6
3.7
Long-Term Debt (Including Long-Term Debt Due Within One Year)1,622.6
411,495.2
411,513.3
42

$3,462.1
100
$3,429.0
100
$2,988.4
100
$3,958.2
100
$3,651.0
100
$3,581.5
100




Liquidity and Capital Resources (Continued)

Cash Flows. Selected information from ALLETE’s Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows is as follows:
Year Ended December 312016
2015
2014
2019
2018
2017
Millions    
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period
$97.0

$145.8

$97.3
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash at Beginning of Period
$79.0

$110.1

$38.3
Cash Flows from (used for)    
Operating Activities332.0
340.1
269.8
249.5
433.1
402.9
Investing Activities(276.2)(618.8)(625.7)(345.3)(349.0)(229.0)
Financing Activities(125.3)229.9
404.4
109.3
(115.2)(102.1)
Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents(69.5)(48.8)48.5
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period
$27.5

$97.0

$145.8
Change in Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash13.5
(31.1)71.8
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash at End of Period
$92.5

$79.0

$110.1


Operating Activities. Cash from operating activities was lower in 20162019 compared to 20152018 primarily due to a paymentthe refund of $31.0 million made as part of a long-term PSA between Minnesota PowerPower’s provisions for tax reform and Silver Bay Power, cash contributionsinterim rates to our defined benefit pension plancustomers, fewer customer deposits received and non-cash items,lower recoveries from customers under cost recovery riders in 2019. These decreases were partially offset by higher net income, lower fuel inventory and increased recoveries through our cost recovery riders.the timing of collections of accounts receivable.


Cash from operating activities was higher in 20152018 compared to 20142017 primarily due to higher net incomethe sale of a wind energy facility to Montana-Dakota Utilities in 2018 and non-cash items (primarily depreciation expense and impairment of real estate), and increased recoveries through our cost recovery riders, partially offset bythe timing of accounts payable, payments.partially offset by lower recoveries from customers under cost recovery riders and higher contributions to the defined benefit pension plans in 2018.




Liquidity and Capital Resources (Continued)
Cash Flows (Continued)

Investing Activities. Cash used for investing activities in 2019 was similar to 2018 reflecting proceeds received from the sale of U.S. Water Services, mostly offset by higher additions to property, plant and equipment.

Cash used for investing activities was lowerhigher in 20162018 compared to 20152017 primarily due to a decreasehigher capital expenditures and additional contributions to equity method investments in 2018. (See Note 5. Equity Investments.) These increases in cash used for the acquisitions of subsidiaries, as well as fewer capital expenditures in 2016. In 2015, we acquired U.S. Water Services, and ALLETE Clean Energy acquired the Chanarambie/Viking and Armenia Mountain wind energy facilities. (See Note 6. Acquisitions.)

Cash used for investing activities were partially offset by the acquisition of Tonka Water in 20152017.

Financing Activities. Cash from financing activities was lower than 2014higher in 2019 primarily due to lower capital expenditures in 2015, partially offset by increased acquisitions of subsidiaries.

Financing Activities. Cash used for financing activities decreased in 2016 compared to 2015 primarily due to lowerhigher proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt and proceeds from a tax equity financing (non-controlling interest in subsidiaries), partially offset by higher dividends on common stock.


Cash fromused for financing activities was higher in 2015 was lower than 20142018 compared to 2017 primarily due to higher dividends on common stock as well as lower proceeds from the net issuance of common stock and long-term debt in 2018, partially offset by lower repayments of long-term debt and common stock in 2015, increased dividends on common stock in 2015 and construction deposits received for the development of a wind energy facility sold to Montana-Dakota Utilities in 2015.2018.


Working Capital. Additional working capital, if and when needed, generally is provided by consolidated bank lines of credit and the saleissuance of securities, orincluding long-term debt, common stock and commercial paper. As of December 31, 2016,2019, we had consolidated bank lines of credit aggregating $409.0$407.0 million ($408.4407.0 million as of December 31, 2015)2018), the majoritymost of which expire in November 2019.January 2024. We had $11.1$62.0 million outstanding in standby letters of credit and no outstanding draws under our lines of credit as of December 31, 20162019 ($12.418.4 million in standby letters of credit and $1.6 millionno outstanding in draws as of December 31, 2015)2018). In addition, as of December 31, 2016,2019, we had 3.43.7 million original issue shares of our common stock available for issuance through Invest Direct our direct stock purchase and dividend reinvestment plan, and 3.92.9 million original issue shares of common stock available for issuance through a distribution agreement with Lampert Capital Markets, Inc. (See Securities.) The amount and timing of future sales of our securities will depend upon market conditions and our specific needs.


On January 10, 2019, ALLETE entered into an amended and restated $400 million credit agreement (Credit Agreement). The Credit Agreement amended and restated ALLETE’s $400 million credit facility, which was scheduled to expire in October 2020. The Credit Agreement is unsecured, has a variable interest rate and will expire in January 2024. At ALLETE’s request and subject to certain conditions, the Credit Agreement may be increased by up to $150 million and ALLETE may make two requests to extend the maturity date, each for a one‑year extension. Advances may be used by ALLETE for general corporate purposes, to provide liquidity in support of ALLETE's commercial paper program and to issue up to $100 million in letters of credit.



Liquidity and Capital Resources (Continued)

Securities. We entered into a distribution agreement with Lampert Capital Markets, Inc., in 2008, as amended most recently in August 2016, with respect to the issuance and sale of up to an aggregate of 13.6 million shares of our common stock, without par value, of which 3.92.9 million shares remain available for issuance.issuance as of December 31, 2019. For the year ended December 31, 2016, 0.1 million2019, no shares of common stock were issued under this agreement resulting(none in net proceeds of $8.0 million (1.32018; 1 million shares for net proceeds of $69.9$65.7 million in 2015; 1.9 million shares for net proceeds of $90.0 million in 2014)2017). The shares issued in 2015 and 20142017 were offered and sold pursuant to Registration Statement No. 333-190335.333-212794. On August 1, 2016,July 31, 2019, we filed Registration Statement No. 333-212794,333-232905, pursuant to which the remaining shares will continue to be offered for sale, from time to time.


During the year ended December 31, 2016,2019, we issued 0.40.2 million shares of common stock through Invest Direct, the ESPP,Employee Stock Purchase Plan, and the RSOP,Retirement Savings and Stock Ownership Plan, resulting in net proceeds of $22.9$1.9 million (0.4 million shares were issued in 2015, resulting infor net proceeds of $25.9 million; 0.5$20.3 million in 2018; 0.3 million shares were issued in 2014, resulting infor net proceeds of $25.4 million)$20.3 million in 2017). These shares of common stock were registered under Registration Statement Nos. 333-231030, 333-211075, 333-188315, 333-183051 and 333-162890. See Note 10. Common Stock and Earnings Per Share for additional detail regarding ALLETE’s equity securities.


On December 8, 2016,March 1, 2019, ALLETE entered into an agreementissued and sold the following First Mortgage Bonds (the Bonds):
Maturity DatePrincipal AmountInterest Rate
March 1, 2029$70 Million4.08%
March 1, 2049$30 Million4.47%

ALLETE has the option to sell $80.0 millionprepay all or a portion of the Company's senior unsecured notes (the Notes)Bonds at its discretion, subject to certain institutional buyers ina make-whole provision. The Bonds are subject to additional terms and conditions which are customary for these types of transactions. ALLETE used the private placement market.proceeds from the sale of the Bonds to fund utility capital investment and for general corporate purposes. The Notes will beBonds were sold in reliance on an exemption from registration under Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, to institutional accredited investors.

On August 14, 2019, ALLETE entered into a $110.0 million term loan agreement (Term Loan). The NotesTerm Loan is an unsecured, single draw loan that is due on August 25, 2020, and may be prepaid at any time subject to a make-whole provision. Interest on the Term Loan is payable monthly at a rate per annum equal to LIBOR plus 1.025 percent. Proceeds from the Term Loan were used for general corporate purposes.

On January 10, 2020, ALLETE entered into a $200 million term loan agreement (Term Loan) and borrowed $60 million upon execution. The unsecured Term Loan provides for the ability to borrow up to an additional $140 million, is due on February 10, 2021, and may be repaid at any time. Interest is payable monthly at a rate per annum equal to LIBOR plus 0.55 percent. Proceeds from the Term Loan will be issued on or about June 1, 2017, carry an interest rate of 3.11 percent and mature on June 1, 2027. (Seeused for construction-related expenditures. See Note 10.8. Short-Term and Long-Term Debt.)Debt for additional detail regarding ALLETE’s debt securities.

On January 17, 2017, we contributed approximately 0.2 million shares of ALLETE common stock to our pension plan, which had an aggregate value of $13.5 million when contributed. No shares of ALLETE common stock were contributed to the pension plan for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015. In 2014, we contributed approximately 0.4 million shares of ALLETE common stock to our pension plan, which had an aggregate value of $19.5 million when contributed. These shares of ALLETE common stock were contributed in reliance upon an exemption available pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.


Financial Covenants. See Note 10.8. Short-Term and Long-Term Debt for information regarding our financial covenants.


Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans. Management considers various factors when making funding decisions, such as regulatory requirements, actuarially determined minimum contribution requirements and contributions required to avoid benefit restrictions for the defined benefit pension plans. For the year ended December 31, 2019, we contributed $10.4 million in cash to the defined benefit pension plans. On January 15, 2020, we contributed $10.7 million in cash to the defined benefit pension plans. We do not expect to make any additional contributions to our defined benefit pension plans in 2020, and we do not expect to make any contributions to our other postretirement benefit plans in 2020. (See Note 10. Common Stock and Earnings Per Share and Note 12. Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans.)

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements. Off-balance sheet arrangements are discussed in Note 11.9. Commitments, Guarantees and Contingencies.






Liquidity and Capital Resources (Continued)


Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments. ALLETE has contractual obligations and other commitments that will need to be funded in the future, in addition to its capital expenditure programs. The following table summarizes contractual obligations and other commercial commitments as of December 31, 2016.2019:
Payments Due by PeriodPayments Due by Period
 Less than1 to 34 to 5After Less than1 to 34 to 5After
Contractual Obligations (a)
Total1 YearYears5 YearsTotal1 YearYears5 Years
Millions  
Long-Term Debt
$2,348.0

$250.0

$230.5

$298.9

$1,568.6

$2,396.7

$277.0

$301.2

$259.2

$1,559.3
Pension (b)(a)
457.9
45.0
90.6
91.3
231.0
490.7
51.2
100.8
99.4
239.3
Other Postretirement Benefit Plans (b)(a)
99.6
9.3
19.1
19.8
51.4
81.3
8.6
16.6
16.0
40.1
Capital Purchase Obligations292.7
292.7



Easement Obligations197.1
5.0
10.7
11.0
170.4
Operating Lease Obligations68.1
13.7
22.7
13.4
18.3
35.2
6.6
11.0
6.1
11.5
PPA Obligations (c)
2,367.0
98.0
208.4
256.7
1,803.9
PPA Obligations (b)
2,051.8
113.0
268.0
284.1
1,386.7
Other Purchase Obligations82.8
47.1
34.8
0.7
0.2
32.5
22.8
9.6

0.1
Total Contractual Obligations
$5,423.4

$463.1

$606.1

$680.8

$3,673.4

$5,578.0

$776.9

$717.9

$675.8

$3,407.4
(a)Excludes $2.0 million of non-current unrecognized tax benefits due to uncertainty regarding the timing of future cash payments related to uncertain tax positions.
(b)Represents the estimated future benefit payments for our defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans through 2026.2029.
(c)(b)ExcludesDoes not include the agreement with Manitoba Hydro expiring in 2022, as this contract is for surplus energy only, and the 133 MW agreement with Manitoba Hydro commencing in 2020, as Minnesota Power’s obligation under this contract is subject to construction of additional transmission capacity. Also excludesonly; Oliver Wind I and Oliver Wind II, as Minnesota Power only pays for energy as it is delivered.delivered; and the agreement with Nobles 2 commencing in 2020 as it is subject to construction of a wind energy facility. (See Note 11.9. Commitments, Guarantees and Contingencies.)


Long-Term Debt. Our long-term debt obligations, including long-term debt due within one year, represent the principal amount of bonds, notes and loans which are recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, plus interest. The table above assumes that the interest rates in effect at December 31, 20162019, remain constant through the remaining term. (See Note 10.8. Short-Term and Long-TermLong‑Term Debt.)


Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans. Our pension and other postretirement benefit plan obligations represent our current estimate of future benefit payments through 2026.2029. Pension contributions will be dependent on several factors including realized asset performance, future discount rate and other actuarial assumptions, Internal Revenue Service and other regulatory requirements, and contributions required to avoid benefit restrictions for the pension plans. Funding for the other postretirement benefit plans is impacted by realized asset performance, future discount rate and other actuarial assumptions, and utility regulatory requirements. These amounts are estimates and will change based on actual market performance, changes in interest rates and any changes in governmental regulations. (See Note 15.12. Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans.)


Easement Obligations. Easement obligations represent the minimum payments for our land easement agreements at our wind energy facilities.

PPA Obligations. PPA obligations represent our Square Butte, Manitoba Hydro, Minnkota Power and other PPA’s.PPAs. (See Note 11.9. Commitments, Guarantees and Contingencies.)


Other Purchase Obligations. Other purchase obligations represents our minimum purchase commitments under coal and rail contracts, and purchase obligationslong-term service agreements for certain capital expenditure projects.wind energy facilities. (See Note 11.9. Commitments, Guarantees and Contingencies.)




Liquidity and Capital Resources (Continued)

Credit Ratings. Access to reasonably priced capital markets is dependent in part on credit and ratings. Our securities have been rated by Standard & Poor’sS&P and by Moody’s. Rating agencies use both quantitative and qualitative measures in determining a company’s credit rating. These measures include business risk, liquidity risk, competitive position, capital mix, financial condition, predictability of cash flows, management strength and future direction. Some of the quantitative measures can be analyzed through a few key financial ratios, while the qualitative ones are more subjective. Our current credit ratings are listed in the following table:


Liquidity and Capital Resources (Continued)
Credit Ratings (Continued)
Credit RatingsStandard & Poor’sS&PMoody’s
Issuer Credit RatingBBB+A3Baa1
Commercial PaperA-2P-2
First Mortgage BondsA(a)A1A2
(a)Not rated by S&P.


On March 26, 2019, Moody’s downgraded the long-term ratings of ALLETE, including its issuer rating to Baa1 from A3, and changed its credit rating outlook to stable from negative. Moody’s noted the combined impact of the 2018 adverse general rate case outcome at Minnesota Power as well as its debt coverage ratios going forward as its rationale for the downgrade.

The disclosureCompany believes it is well-positioned to meet its liquidity needs. As of theseDecember 31, 2019, we had cash and cash equivalents of $69.3 million, $345.0 million in available consolidated lines of credit ratings is notand a recommendation to buy, sell or holddebt-to-capital ratio of 41 percent. Our cash from operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2019 was $249.5 million. In addition, as of December 31, 2019, we had 3.7 million original issue shares of our securities. Ratings are subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the assigning rating organization. Each rating should be evaluated independentlycommon stock available for issuance through Invest Direct and 2.9 million original issue shares of any other rating.common stock available for issuance through a distribution agreement with Lampert Capital Markets, Inc.


Common Stock Dividends. ALLETE is committed to providing a competitive dividend to its shareholders while at the same time funding its growth. The Company’sALLETE’s long-term objective is to maintain a dividend payout ratio similar to our peers and provide for future dividend increases. Our targeted payout range is between 60 percent and 65 percent. In 2016,2019, we paid out 6665 percent (69(66 percent in 2015; 682018; 63 percent in 2014)2017) of our per share earnings in dividends. On January 25, 2017,30, 2020, our Board of Directors declared a dividend of $0.535$0.6175 per share, which is payable on March 1, 2017,2020, to shareholders of record at the close of business on February 15, 2017.14, 2020.




Capital Requirements


ALLETE’s projected capital expenditures for the years 20172020 through 20212024 are presented in the following table. Actual capital expenditures may vary from the estimatesprojections due to changes in forecasted plant maintenance, regulatory decisions or approvals, future environmental requirements, base load growth, capital market conditions or executions of new business strategies.

Capital ExpendituresCapital Expenditures2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Total
Capital Expenditures2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Total
MillionsMillions Millions 
Regulated OperationsRegulated Operations Regulated Operations 
Base and Other
$120

$215

$180

$175

$165

$855
Base and Other
$145

$245

$300

$235

$130

$1,055
Cost Recovery (a)
 
Transmission Cost Recovery (a)
25




25
Renewable5




5
Nemadji Trail Energy Center (b)
10
65
70
165
25
335
Transmission (b)
120
80
85
50

335
Total Cost Recovery125
80
85
50

340
Regulated Operations Capital ExpendituresRegulated Operations Capital Expenditures245
295
265
225
165
1,195
Regulated Operations Capital Expenditures180
310
370
400
155
1,415
Other (c)
50
70
35
45
20
220
ALLETE Clean Energy (c)
ALLETE Clean Energy (c)
340
10
5
5
10
370
Corporate and OtherCorporate and Other15
15
25
30
15
100
Total Capital ExpendituresTotal Capital Expenditures
$295

$365

$300

$270

$185

$1,415
Total Capital Expenditures
$535

$335

$400

$435

$180

$1,885
(a)Estimated capital expenditures eligible for cost recovery outside of a general rate case.
(b)Ourcase, including our portion of transmission capital expenditures related to construction of the GNTL is estimated at approximately $330 million through 2020.GNTL. (See Item 1. Business – Regulated Operations – Transmission and Distribution.)
(c)(b)Includes projectedOur portion of estimated capital expenditures for our non-regulated operations.construction of NTEC, a 525 MW to 625 MW combined-cycle natural gas-fired generating facility which will be jointly owned by Dairyland Power Cooperative and a subsidiary of ALLETE.
(c)Capital expenditures in 2020 include construction of an 80 MW wind energy facility and a 300 MW wind energy facility that ALLETE Clean Energy will build, own and operate. These capital expenditures do not include the cost of safe harbor turbines purchased previously. (See Outlook – ALLETE Clean Energy.)


We are well positioned to meet our financing needs due to adequate operating cash flows, available additional working capital and access to capital markets. We will finance capital expenditures from a combination of internally generated funds, debt and equity issuance proceeds. We intend to maintain a capital structure with capital ratios near current levels. (See Capital Structure.)







Environmental and Other Matters


Our businesses are subject to regulation of environmental matters by various federal, state and local authorities. A number of regulatory changes to the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act and various waste management requirements have recently been promulgated by both the EPA and state authorities.authorities over the past several years. Minnesota Power’s facilities are subject to additional regulationrequirements under many of these regulations. In response to these regulations, Minnesota Power is reshaping its generation portfolio, over time, to reduce its reliance on coal, has installed cost-effective emission control technology, and advocates for sound science and policy during rulemaking implementation. (See Note 11.9. Commitments, Guarantees and Contingencies.)




Market Risk


Securities Investments.


Available-for-Sale Securities. As of December 31, 20162019, our available-for-sale securities portfolio consisted primarily of securities held in other postretirement plans to fund employee benefits. (See Note 8. Investments.)


Interest Rate Risk. INTEREST RATE RISK

We are exposed to risks resulting from changes in interest rates as a result of our issuance of variable rate debt. We manage our interest rate risk by varying the issuance and maturity dates of our fixed rate debt, limiting the amount of variable rate debt, and continually monitoring the effects of market changes in interest rates. We may also enter into derivative financial instruments, such as interest rate swaps, to mitigate interest rate exposure. The following table presents the long-term debt obligations and the corresponding weighted average interest rate as of December 31, 20162019:
Expected Maturity DateExpected Maturity Date
Interest Rate Sensitive
Financial Instruments
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Thereafter
Total
Fair Value2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Thereafter
Total
Fair Value
Long-Term Debt    
Fixed Rate – Millions
$62.0

$62.0

$54.7

$87.6

$96.4

$1,037.1

$1,399.8

$1,484.5

$89.8

$98.6

$88.8

$88.8

$73.5

$1,031.8

$1,471.3

$1,640.5
Average Interest Rate – %5.4
2.1
7.0
3.8
3.5
4.5
4.4
 4.2
3.9
3.7
5.9
3.9
4.4
4.4
 
  
Variable Rate – Millions
$126.3

$1.1

$0.5

$13.6


$27.8

$169.3

$169.3

$123.5





$27.8

$151.3

$151.3
Average Interest Rate – %1.2
6.2
6.2
0.8

0.7
1.2
 2.7




1.7
2.5
 


Interest rates on variable rate long-term debt are reset on a periodic basis reflecting prevailing market conditions. Based on the variable rate debt outstanding as of December 31, 20162019, an increase of 100 basis points in interest rates would impact the amount of pre-tax interest expense by $1.7$1.5 million. This amount was determined by considering the impact of a hypothetical 100 basis point increase to the average variable interest rate on the variable rate debt outstanding as of December 31, 20162019.


Commodity Price Risk. COMMODITY PRICE RISK

Our regulated utility operations incur costs for power and fuel (primarily coal and related transportation) in Minnesota, and power and natural gas purchased for resale in our regulated service territory in Wisconsin. Minnesota Power’s exposure to price risk for these commodities is significantly mitigated by the current ratemaking process and regulatory framework, which allows recovery of fuel costs in excess of those included in base rates. Conversely,rates or distribution of savings in fuel costs below those in base rates result in a credit to our ratepayers. SWL&P’s exposure to price risk for natural gas is significantly mitigated by the current ratemaking process and regulatory framework, which allows the commodity cost to be passed through to customers. We seek to prudently manage our customers’ exposure to price risk by entering into contracts of various durations and terms for the purchase of power and coal and related transportation costs (Minnesota Power) and natural gas (SWL&P).


Power Marketing.
Market Risk (Continued)

POWER MARKETING

Minnesota Power’s power marketing activities consist of: (1) purchasing energy in the wholesale market to serve its regulated service territory when energy requirements exceed generation output; and (2) selling excess available energy and purchased power. From time to time, Minnesota Power may have excess energy that is temporarily not required by retail and municipal customers in itsour regulated service territory. Minnesota Power actively sells any excess energy to the wholesale market to optimize the value of its generating facilities.


We are exposed to credit risk primarily through our power marketing activities. We use credit policies to manage credit risk, which includes utilizing an established credit approval process and monitoring counterparty limits.






Recently Adopted Accounting Standards.Pronouncements.


New accounting standardspronouncements are discussed in Note 1. Operations and Significant Accounting Policies of this Form 10-K.




Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk


See Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Market Risk for information related to quantitative and qualitative disclosure about market risk.




Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data


See our Consolidated Financial Statements as of December 31, 20162019 and 2015,2018, and for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014,2017, and supplementary data, which are indexed in Item 15(a).




Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure


Not applicable.




Item 9A. Controls and Procedures


Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures


As of December 31, 20162019, evaluations were performed, under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, on the effectiveness of the design and operation of ALLETE’s disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act). Based upon those evaluations, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that such disclosure controls and procedures are effective to provide assurance that information required to be disclosed in ALLETE’s reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.


Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting


Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f). Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the updated Internal Control – Integrated Framework (framework) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on our evaluation under the framework, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2016.2019.


Item 9A. Controls and Procedures (Continued)

The effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20162019, has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which is included herein.


Changes in Internal Controls


There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.




Item 9B. Other Information


Not applicable.






Part III


Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance


Unless otherwise stated, the information required by this Item is incorporated by reference herein from our Proxy Statement for the 20172020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (20172020 Proxy Statement) under the following headings:


Directors. The information regarding directors will be included in the “Election of Directors” section;

Audit Committee Financial Expert. The information regarding the Audit Committee financial expert will be included in the “Corporate Governance” section and the “Audit Committee Report” section;

Audit Committee Members. The identity of the Audit Committee members will be included in the “Corporate Governance” section and the “Audit Committee Report” section;

Executive Officers. The information regarding executive officers is included in Part I of this Form 10-K; and

Section 16(a) Delinquency. If applicable, information regarding Section 16(a) delinquencies will be included in a “Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports” section.

Directors. The information regarding directors will be included in the “Election of Directors” section;

Audit Committee Financial Expert. The information regarding the Audit Committee financial expert will be included in the “Corporate Governance” section and the “Audit Committee Report” section;

Audit Committee Members. The identity of the Audit Committee members will be included in the “Corporate Governance” section and the “Audit Committee Report” section;

Executive Officers. The information regarding executive officers is included in Part I of this Form 10-K; and

Section 16(a) Compliance. The information regarding Section 16(a) compliance will be included in the “Ownership of ALLETE Common Stock – Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” section.

Our 20172020 Proxy Statement will be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the end of our 20162019 fiscal year.


Code of Ethics. We have adopted a written Code of Ethics that applies to all of our employees, including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer. A copy of our Code of Ethics is available on our website at www.allete.com and print copies are available without charge upon request to ALLETE, Inc., Attention: Secretary, 30 West Superior St., Duluth, Minnesota 55802. Any amendment to the Code of Ethics or any waiver of the Code of Ethics will be disclosed on our website at www.allete.com promptly following the date of such amendment or waiver.


Corporate Governance. The following documents are available on our website at www.allete.com and print copies are available upon request:


Corporate Governance Guidelines;


Audit Committee Charter;


Executive Compensation Committee Charter; and


Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee Charter.


Any amendment to these documents will be disclosed on our website at www.allete.com promptly following the date of such amendment.






Item 11. Executive Compensation


The information required forby this Item is incorporated by reference herein from the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” the “Compensation of Executive Officers,” the “Compensation Committee Report” and the “Director Compensation” sections in our 20172020 Proxy Statement.




Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters


The information required forby this Item is incorporated by reference herein from the “Ownership of ALLETE Common Stock – Securities Owned by Certain Beneficial Owners” and the “Ownership of ALLETE Common Stock – Securities Owned by Directors and Management” sections in our 20172020 Proxy Statement.



Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters (Continued)


Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans


The following table sets forth the shares of ALLETE common stock available for issuance under the Company's equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2016:2019:
Plan CategoryNumber of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants, and RightsWeighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants, and Rights
Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (a)
Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants, and Rights (a)
Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants, and Rights (b)
Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (c)
     
Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Security Holders4,357

$40.29
1,296,940
150,181

857,656
Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Security Holders
N/A




Total4,357

$40.29
1,296,940
150,181

857,656
(a)Includes the following: (i) 25,196 securities representing the performance shares (including accrued dividends) granted under the executive long-term incentive compensation plan that vested but were not paid as of December 31, 2019; (ii) 60,656 securities representing the target number of performance share awards (including accrued dividends) granted under the executive long-term incentive compensation plan that were unvested as of December 31, 2019; and (iii) 64,329 director deferred stock units (including accrued dividends) under the non-employee director compensation deferral plan as of December 31, 2019. With respect to unvested performance share awards, the actual number of shares to be issued will vary from 0 percent to 200 percent of the target level depending upon the achievement of total shareholder return objectives established for such awards. For additional information about the performance shares, including payout calculations, see our 2020 Proxy Statement.
(b)Earned performance share awards are paid in shares of ALLETE common stock on a one-for-one basis. Accordingly, these awards do not have a weighted-average exercise price.
(c)Excludes the number of securities shown in the first column as to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants, and rights. The amount shown is comprised of: (i) 1,019,561707,353 shares available for issuance under the executive long-term incentive compensation plan in the form of options, rights, restricted stock units, performance share awards, and other grants as approved by the Executive Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors; (ii) 140,79445,379 shares available for issuance under the Non-Employee Director Stock Plan as payment for a portion of the annual retainer payable to non-employee Directors; and (iii) 136,585104,925 shares available for issuance under the ALLETE and Affiliated Companies Employee Stock Purchase Plan.




Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence


The information required forby this Item is incorporated by reference herein from the “Corporate Governance” section in our 20172020 Proxy Statement.


We have adopted a Related Person Transaction Policy which is available on our website at www.allete.com. Print copies are available without charge, upon request. Any amendment to this policy will be disclosed on our website at www.allete.com promptly following the date of such amendment.






Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services


The information required forby this Item is incorporated by reference herein from the “Audit Committee Report” section in our 20172020 Proxy Statement.






Part IV



Item 15.     Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
(a)Certain Documents Filed as Part of this Form 10-K. 
(1)Financial StatementsPage
 ALLETE 
 
 
 For the Years Ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 20142017 
 
 
 
 
 
(2)Financial Statement Schedules 
 
 All other schedules have been omitted either because the information is not required to be reported by ALLETE or because the information is included in the Consolidated Financial Statements or the notes.
(3)Exhibits including those incorporated by reference. 









Exhibit Number
*4(a)1Mortgage and Deed of Trust, dated as of September 1, 1945, between Minnesota Power & Light Company (now ALLETE) and The Bank of New York Mellon (formerly Irving Trust Company) and Andres Serrano (successor to Richard H. West), Trustees (filed as Exhibit 7(c), File No. 2-5865).
*4(a)2Supplemental Indentures to ALLETE’s Mortgage and Deed of Trust:
  NumberDated as ofReference FileExhibit
  FirstMarch 1, 19492-78267(b)
  SecondJuly 1, 19512-90367(c)
  ThirdMarch 1, 19572-130752(c)
  FourthJanuary 1, 19682-277942(c)
  FifthApril 1, 19712-395372(c)
  SixthAugust 1, 19752-541162(c)
  SeventhSeptember 1, 19762-570142(c)
  EighthSeptember 1, 19772-596902(c)
  NinthApril 1, 19782-608662(c)
  TenthAugust 1, 19782-628522(d)2
  EleventhDecember 1, 19822-566494(a)3
  TwelfthApril 1, 198733-302244(a)3
  ThirteenthMarch 1, 199233-474384(b)
  FourteenthJune 1, 199233-552404(b)
  FifteenthJuly 1, 199233-552404(c)
  SixteenthJuly 1, 199233-552404(d)
  SeventeenthFebruary 1, 199333-501434(b)
  EighteenthJuly 1, 199333-501434(c)
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  4
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Thirty-sixthJune 1, 20141-3548 (June 30, 2014, Form 10-Q)4
Thirty-seventhSeptember 1, 20141-3548 (Sept. 30, 2014, Form 10-Q)4
Thirty-eighthSeptember 1, 20151-3548 (Sept. 30, 2015, Form 10-Q)4(a)



Exhibit Number
*4(b)1

Mortgage and Deed of Trust, dated as of March 1, 1943, between Superior Water, Light and Power Company and Chemical Bank & Trust Company and Howard B. Smith, as Trustees, both succeeded by U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (filed as Exhibit 7(c), File No. 2-8668).
*4(b)2

Supplemental Indentures to Superior Water, Light and Power Company’s Mortgage and Deed of Trust:
  NumberDated as ofReference FileExhibit
  FirstMarch 1, 19512-596902(d)(1)
  SecondMarch 1, 19622-277942(d)1
  ThirdJuly 1, 19762-574782(e)1
  FourthMarch 1, 19852-786414(b)
  FifthDecember 1, 19921-3548 (1992 Form 10-K)4(b)1
  
  
  
  
  
  
  


Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 8, 2007, between ALLETE and Thrivent Financial for Lutherans and The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company (filed as Exhibit 10(a) to the June 30, 2007, Form 10-Q, File No. 1-3548).
*4(d)
Term Loan Agreement dated as of August 25, 2015, among ALLETE, as Borrower, the Lenders party hereto, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, and J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, as Sole Lead Arranger and Sole Book Runner (filed as Exhibit 4 to the August 28, 2015, Form 8-K, File No. 1-3548).
*4(e)





















Exhibit Number





ALLETE Executive Annual Incentive Plan Form of Award Effective 2013 (filed as Exhibit 10(f)5 to the 2012 Form 10‑K, File No. 1-3548).
+*10(e)3
ALLETE Executive Annual Incentive Plan Form of Award Effective 2014 (filed as Exhibit 10(e)6 to the 2013 Form 10‑K, File No. 1-3548).
+*10(e)4
ALLETE Executive Annual Incentive Plan Form of Award Effective 2015 (filed as Exhibit 10(e)6 to the 2014 Form 10‑K, File No. 1-3548).
+*10(e)5












Exhibit Number













Form of ALLETE Executive Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan Performance Share Grant Effective 2011 (filed as Exhibit 10(m)11 to the 2010 Form 10-K, File No. 1-3548).
+*10(h)4
Form of ALLETE Executive Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan Restricted Stock Unit Grant Effective 2011 (filed as Exhibit 10(m)12 to the 2010 Form 10-K, File No. 1-3548).
+*10(h)5
Form of ALLETE Executive Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan Performance Share Grant Effective 2012 (filed as Exhibit 10(m)12 to the 2011 Form 10-K, File No. 1-3548).
+*10(h)6
Form of ALLETE Executive Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan Restricted Stock Unit Grant Effective 2012 (filed as Exhibit 10(m)13 to the 2011 Form 10-K, File No. 1-3548).
+*10(h)7
Form of ALLETE Executive Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan Performance Share Grant Effective 2013 (filed as Exhibit 10(k)14 to the 2012 Form 10-K, File No. 1-3548).
+*10(h)8
Form of ALLETE Executive Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan Restricted Stock Unit Grant Effective 2013 (filed as Exhibit 10(k)15 to the 2012 Form 10-K, File No. 1-3548).
+*10(h)9


















+*10(j)1
Minnesota Power (now ALLETE) Non-Employee Director Stock Plan, effective May 9, 19952017 (filed as Exhibit 1010(i)6 to the March 31, 1995, Form 10-Q, File No. 1-3548).
+*10(j)2
Amendments through December 2003 to the Minnesota Power (now ALLETE) Non-Employee Director Stock Plan (filed as Exhibit 10(z)2 to the 20032016 Form 10-K, File No. 1-3548).


July 2004 Amendment to the
+*10(j)4
January 2007 Amendment to the ALLETE Non-Employee Director Stock Plan (filed as Exhibit 10(n)4 to the 2006 Form 10-K, File No. 1-3548).
+*10(j)5
May 2009 Amendment to the ALLETE Non-Employee Director Stock PlanCash Award Effective 2018 (filed as Exhibit 10(b) to the June 30, 2009,March 31, 2018, Form 10-Q, File No. 1-3548).


May 2010 Amendment to the


October 2010 Amendment to the







Exhibit Number




















12

Computation of Ratios of Earnings
21














101.INS

XBRL Instance Document - the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.
101.SCH

XBRL Schema
101.CAL

XBRL Calculation
101.DEF

XBRL Definition
101.LAB

XBRL Label
101.PRE

XBRL Presentation
104
Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101)



Exhibits (Continued)


ALLETE or its subsidiaries are obligors under various long-term debt instruments including, but not limited to, the following:


$38,995,000 original principal amount, of City of Cohasset, Minnesota, Variable Rate Demand Revenue Refunding Bonds (ALLETE, formerly Minnesota Power & Light Company, Project) Series 1997A ($13,500,000 remaining principal balance);
$27,800,000 of Collier County Industrial Development Authority, Industrial Development Variable Rate Demand Refunding Revenue Bonds Series 2006;
$6,370,000 of City of Superior, Wisconsin, Collateralized Utility Revenue Refunding Bonds Series 2007A; and
$6,130,000 of City of Superior, Wisconsin, Collateralized Utility Revenue Bonds Series 2007B.


Pursuant to Item 601(b)(4)(iii) of Regulation S-K, these and other long-term debt instruments are not filed as exhibits because the total amount of debt authorized under each of these omitted instrumentsinstrument does not exceed 10 percent of our total consolidated assets. We will furnish copies of these instruments to the SEC upon its request.


*Incorporated herein by reference as indicated.
+Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement pursuant to Item 15(b).




Item 16. Form 10-K Summary


None.








Signatures


Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


  ALLETE, Inc.
  
  
Dated:February 15, 201713, 2020By /s/ Alan R. Hodnik
  Alan R. Hodnik
  Executive Chairman President, Chief Executive Officerand Director


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.


Signature Title Date
     
/s/ Alan R. HodnikBethany M. Owen Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director February 15, 201713, 2020
Alan R. HodnikBethany M. Owen (Principal Executive Officer)  
     
/s/ Steven Q. DeVinckRobert J. Adams Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer February 15, 201713, 2020
Steven Q. DeVinckRobert J. Adams (Principal Financial Officer)  
     
/s/ Steven W. Morris Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer February 15, 201713, 2020
Steven W. Morris (Principal Accounting Officer)  



Signatures (Continued)
Signature Title Date
     
/s/ Kathryn W. Dindo Director February 15, 201713, 2020
Kathryn W. Dindo
/s/ Sidney W. Emery, Jr.DirectorFebruary 15, 2017
Sidney W. Emery, Jr.    
     
/s/ George G. Goldfarb Director February 15, 201713, 2020
George G. Goldfarb
/s/ James S. Haines, Jr.DirectorFebruary 15, 2017
James S. Haines, Jr.    
     
/s/ James J. Hoolihan Director February 15, 201713, 2020
James J. Hoolihan    
     
/s/ Heidi E. Jimmerson Director February 15, 201713, 2020
Heidi E. Jimmerson    
     
/s/ Madeleine W. Ludlow Director February 15, 201713, 2020
Madeleine W. Ludlow
/s/ Susan K. NestegardDirectorFebruary 13, 2020
Susan K. Nestegard    
     
/s/ Douglas C. Neve Director February 15, 201713, 2020
Douglas C. Neve    
     
/s/ Leonard C. RodmanRobert P. Powers Director February 15, 201713, 2020
Leonard C. RodmanRobert P. Powers    






Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


Tothe Board of Directors and Shareholders of ALLETE, Inc.:


In our opinion,Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, equity and cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial positionsheet of ALLETE, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the Company) atas of December 31, 20162019 and December 31, 2015,2018, and the resultsrelated consolidated statements of their operationsincome, of comprehensive income, of equity and theirof cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in2019, including the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, therelated notes and financial statement schedule listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(2) presents fairly,for each of the three years in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction withperiod ended December 31, 2019 (collectively referred to as the related consolidated financial statements. Also in our opinion,statements). We also have audited the Company maintained, in all material respects, effectiveCompany's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20162019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the COSO.

Change in Accounting Principle

As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed the manner in which it accounts for leases in 2019.

Basis for Opinions

The Company's management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, and financial statement schedule, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management'sManagement’s Report on Internal Control overOver Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express opinions on thesethe Company’s consolidated financial statements on the financial statement schedule, and on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence supportingregarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements, assessingstatements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, andas well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statement presentation.statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.


Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and


expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.


Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.


Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (i) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (ii) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

Accounting for the Effects of Regulatory Matters

As described in Notes 1 and 4 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company’s regulated utility operations are subject to accounting standards for the effects of certain types of regulation. As of December 31, 2019, there was $421 million of regulatory assets and $562 million of regulatory liabilities recorded. Regulatory assets represent incurred costs that have been deferred as they are probable for recovery in customer rates. Regulatory liabilities represent obligations to make refunds to customers and amounts collected in rates for which the related costs have not yet been incurred. Management assesses quarterly whether regulatory assets and liabilities meet the criteria for probability of future recovery or deferral. As disclosed by management, these standards require the Company to reflect the effect of regulatory decisions in its financial statements. This assessment considers factors such as, but not limited to, changes in the regulatory environment and recent rate orders to other regulated entities under the same jurisdiction. If future recovery or refund of costs becomes no longer probable, the assets and liabilities would be recognized in current period net income or other comprehensive income.

The principal consideration for our determination that performing procedures relating to the Company’s accounting for the effects of regulatory matters is a critical audit matter are there was significant judgment by management in determining the recoverability of costs. This in turn led to a high degree of auditor judgment, subjectivity and effort in performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence obtained related to the recoverability of costs.

Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls relating to management’s implementation of new regulatory orders, changes to existing regulatory orders, and assessing the recoverability of costs. These procedures also included, among others, evaluating (i) the reasonableness of management’s assessment of impacts arising from correspondence with regulators and changes in laws and regulations, (ii) management’s judgments related to the recoverability of regulatory assets and the establishment of regulatory liabilities, and (iii) the sufficiency of the disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Testing the regulatory assets and liabilities involved considering the provisions and formulas outlined in rate orders, other regulatory correspondence, and application of relevant regulatory precedents.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Minneapolis, Minnesota
February 15, 201713, 2020

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 1963.






CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


ALLETE Consolidated Balance Sheet


As of December 312016
2015
2019
2018
Millions  
Assets  
Current Assets  
Cash and Cash Equivalents
$27.5

$97.0

$69.3

$69.1
Accounts Receivable (Less Allowance of $3.1 and $1.0)122.5
121.2
Accounts Receivable (Less Allowance of $0.9 and $1.7)96.4
144.4
Inventories – Net104.2
117.1
72.8
86.7
Prepayments and Other40.3
35.7
31.0
34.1
Total Current Assets294.5
371.0
269.5
334.3
Property, Plant and Equipment – Net3,741.2
3,669.1
4,377.0
3,904.4
Regulatory Assets359.6
372.0
420.5
389.5
Investment in ATC135.6
124.5
Other Investments55.6
74.6
Equity Investments197.6
161.1
Goodwill and Intangible Assets – Net213.4
215.2
1.0
223.3
Other Non-Current Assets106.5
68.1
217.2
152.4
Total Assets
$4,906.4

$4,894.5

$5,482.8

$5,165.0
Liabilities and Equity  
Liabilities  
Current Liabilities  
Accounts Payable
$74.0

$88.8

$165.2

$149.8
Accrued Taxes46.5
44.0
50.8
51.4
Accrued Interest17.6
18.6
18.1
17.9
Long-Term Debt Due Within One Year187.7
35.7
212.9
57.5
Notes Payable
1.6
Other73.7
86.1
60.4
128.5
Total Current Liabilities399.5
274.8
507.4
405.1
Long-Term Debt1,370.4
1,556.7
1,400.9
1,428.5
Deferred Income Taxes584.1
579.8
212.8
223.6
Regulatory Liabilities125.8
105.0
560.3
512.1
Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans210.9
206.8
172.8
177.3
Other Non-Current Liabilities322.7
349.0
293.0
262.6
Total Liabilities3,013.4
3,072.1
3,147.2
3,009.2
Commitments, Guarantees and Contingencies (Note 11)
Commitments, Guarantees and Contingencies (Note 9)

Equity  
ALLETE’s Equity  
Common Stock Without Par Value, 80.0 Shares Authorized, 49.6 and 49.1 Shares Issued and Outstanding1,295.3
1,271.4
Common Stock Without Par Value, 80.0 Shares Authorized, 51.7 and 51.5 Shares Issued and Outstanding1,436.7
1,428.5
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss(28.2)(24.5)(23.6)(27.3)
Retained Earnings625.9
573.3
818.8
754.6
Total ALLETE Equity1,893.0
1,820.2
2,231.9
2,155.8
Non-Controlling Interest in Subsidiaries
2.2
103.7

Total Equity1,893.0
1,822.4
2,335.6
2,155.8
Total Liabilities and Equity
$4,906.4

$4,894.5

$5,482.8

$5,165.0

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.


ALLETE Consolidated Statement of Income

Year Ended December 312016
2015
2014
Millions Except Per Share Amounts   
Operating Revenue
$1,339.7

$1,486.4

$1,136.8
Operating Expenses   
Fuel and Purchased Power332.9
328.1
356.1
Transmission Services65.2
54.1
45.6
Cost of Sales144.7
302.3
77.9
Operating and Maintenance334.1
333.5
287.1
Depreciation and Amortization195.8
170.0
135.7
Taxes Other than Income Taxes53.8
51.4
45.6
Other(10.3)36.3

Total Operating Expenses1,116.2
1,275.7
948.0
Operating Income223.5
210.7
188.8
Other Income (Expense)   
Interest Expense(70.3)(64.9)(54.8)
Equity Earnings in ATC18.5
16.3
19.6
Other3.9
4.7
8.6
Total Other Expense(47.9)(43.9)(26.6)
Income Before Non-Controlling Interest and Income Taxes175.6
166.8
162.2
Income Tax Expense19.8
25.3
36.7
Net Income155.8
141.5
125.5
Less: Non-Controlling Interest in Subsidiaries0.5
0.4
0.7
Net Income Attributable to ALLETE
$155.3

$141.1

$124.8
Average Shares of Common Stock   
Basic49.3
48.3
42.9
Diluted49.5
48.4
43.1
Basic Earnings Per Share of Common Stock
$3.15

$2.92

$2.91
Diluted Earnings Per Share of Common Stock
$3.14

$2.92

$2.90
Dividends Per Share of Common Stock
$2.08

$2.02

$1.96


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.





ALLETE Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income


Year Ended December 312016
2015
2014
Millions   
Net Income
$155.8

$141.5

$125.5
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)   
Unrealized Loss on Securities   
Net of Income Tax Benefit of $(0.2), $(0.3) and $(0.2)(0.2)(0.5)(0.2)
Unrealized Gain on Derivatives   
Net of Income Tax Expense of $–, $0.1 and $0.1
0.1
0.2
Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans   
Net of Income Tax Benefit of $(2.4), $(2.2) and $(2.8)(3.5)(3.0)(4.0)
Total Other Comprehensive Loss(3.7)(3.4)(4.0)
Total Comprehensive Income152.1
138.1
121.5
Less: Non-Controlling Interest in Subsidiaries0.5
0.4
0.7
Total Comprehensive Income Attributable to ALLETE
$151.6

$137.7

$120.8
Year Ended December 312019
2018
2017
Millions Except Per Share Amounts   
Operating Revenue   
Contracts with Customers – Utility
$1,042.4

$1,059.5

$1,063.8
Contracts with Customers – Non-utility186.5
415.5
331.9
Other – Non-utility11.6
23.6
23.6
Total Operating Revenue1,240.5
1,498.6
1,419.3
Operating Expenses   
Fuel, Purchased Power and Gas – Utility390.7
407.5
396.9
Transmission Services – Utility69.8
69.9
71.2
Cost of Sales – Non-utility80.6
218.0
147.5
Operating and Maintenance264.3
340.5
344.1
Depreciation and Amortization202.0
205.6
177.5
Taxes Other than Income Taxes53.3
57.9
56.9
Other
(2.0)(0.7)
Total Operating Expenses1,060.7
1,297.4
1,193.4
Operating Income179.8
201.2
225.9
Other Income (Expense)   
Interest Expense(64.9)(67.9)(67.8)
Equity Earnings21.7
17.5
22.5
Gain on Sale of U.S. Water Services23.6


Other18.7
7.8
6.3
Total Other Expense(0.9)(42.6)(39.0)
Income Before Non-Controlling Interest and Income Taxes178.9
158.6
186.9
Income Tax Expense (Benefit)(6.6)(15.5)14.7
Net Income185.5
174.1
172.2
Less: Non-Controlling Interest in Subsidiaries(0.1)

Net Income Attributable to ALLETE
$185.6

$174.1

$172.2
Average Shares of Common Stock   
Basic51.6
51.3
50.8
Diluted51.7
51.5
51.0
Basic Earnings Per Share of Common Stock
$3.59

$3.39

$3.39
Diluted Earnings Per Share of Common Stock
$3.59

$3.38

$3.38


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.








ALLETE Consolidated Statement of Cash FlowsComprehensive Income


Year Ended December 312016
2015
2014
Millions   
Operating Activities   
Net Income
$155.8

$141.5

$125.5
Allowance for Funds Used During Construction – Equity(2.1)(3.3)(7.8)
Income from Equity Investments – Net of Dividends(5.7)(1.8)(2.6)
Impairment of Real Estate
36.3

Impairment of Goodwill3.3


Change in Fair Value of Contingent Consideration(13.6)

Gain on Sales of Investments and Property, Plant and Equipment(6.0)(0.2)(0.2)
Depreciation Expense190.6
165.9
135.7
Amortization of Power Sales Agreements(22.3)(23.2)(12.7)
Amortization of Other Intangible Assets and Other Assets10.3
5.6
0.7
Deferred Income Tax Expense19.4
25.1
32.7
Share-Based Compensation Expense2.6
2.6
2.3
ESOP Compensation Expense2.5
9.0
9.1
Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Expense4.6
15.4
12.8
Bad Debt Expense4.1
1.6
1.8
Changes in Operating Assets and Liabilities   
Accounts Receivable(4.7)1.1
(3.5)
Inventories13.3
(22.1)(17.5)
Prepayments and Other(6.9)3.7
4.8
Accounts Payable6.5
(19.3)10.9
Other Current Liabilities(13.8)5.1
(3.5)
Cash Contributions to Defined Benefit Pension Plans(6.3)

Changes in Regulatory and Other Non-Current Assets(10.7)0.6
(21.3)
Changes in Regulatory and Other Non-Current Liabilities11.1
(3.5)2.6
Cash from Operating Activities332.0
340.1
269.8
Investing Activities   
Proceeds from Sale of Available-for-sale Securities9.0
1.7
3.6
Payments for Purchase of Available-for-sale Securities(9.4)(2.3)(5.0)
Acquisitions of Subsidiaries – Net of Cash Acquired(5.9)(333.3)(60.3)
Investment in ATC(5.4)(1.6)(3.9)
Changes to Other Investments4.4
3.1
33.0
Additions to Property, Plant and Equipment(265.6)(286.8)(572.8)
Construction Costs for Development Project

(25.7)
Cash in Escrow for Acquisition

5.4
Proceeds from Sale of Property, Plant and Equipment0.7
0.4

Changes in Restricted Cash(4.0)

Cash for Investing Activities(276.2)(618.8)(625.7)
Financing Activities   
Proceeds from Issuance of Common Stock30.9
161.2
200.6
Proceeds from Issuance of Long-Term Debt4.8
324.5
375.0
Changes in Restricted Cash7.0
8.5
(1.8)
Changes in Notes Payable(1.6)(2.1)3.7
Repayments of Long-Term Debt(54.8)(160.2)(134.5)
Acquisition of Non-Controlling Interest(8.0)
(6.0)
Construction Deposits Received for Development Project

54.3
Dividends on Common Stock(102.7)(97.9)(83.8)
Other Financing Activities(0.9)(4.1)(3.1)
Cash from (for) Financing Activities(125.3)229.9
404.4
Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents(69.5)(48.8)48.5
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period97.0
145.8
97.3
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period
$27.5

$97.0

$145.8
Year Ended December 312019
2018
2017
Millions   
Net Income
$185.5

$174.1

$172.2
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)   
Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Securities   
Net of Income Tax Expense of $0.1, $– and $0.70.2
(0.1)0.9
Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans   
Net of Income Tax Expense of $1.4, $0.3 and $2.23.5
1.0
4.7
Total Other Comprehensive Income3.7
0.9
5.6
Total Comprehensive Income189.2
175.0
177.8
Less: Non-Controlling Interest in Subsidiaries(0.1)

Total Comprehensive Income Attributable to ALLETE
$189.3

$175.0

$177.8


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.







ALLETE Consolidated Statement of EquityCash Flows


 
Total
Equity
Retained
Earnings
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss
Unearned
ESOP
Shares
Common
Stock
Non-Controlling Interest in Subsidiaries
Millions      
Balance as of December 31, 2013
$1,342.9

$489.1
$(17.1)$(14.3)
$885.2

Recognition of Non-Controlling Interest7.1





$7.1
Comprehensive Income      
Net Income125.5
124.8



0.7
Other Comprehensive Income – Net of Tax      
Unrealized Loss on Securities(0.2)
(0.2)


Unrealized Gain on Derivatives0.2

0.2



Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans(4.0)
(4.0)


Total Comprehensive Income121.5
     
Common Stock Issued222.4



222.4

Dividends Declared(83.8)(83.8)



ESOP Shares Earned7.1


7.1


Acquisition of Non-Controlling Interest(6.0)



(6.0)
Balance as of December 31, 20141,611.2
530.1
(21.1)(7.2)1,107.6
1.8
Comprehensive Income      
Net Income141.5
141.1



0.4
Other Comprehensive Income – Net of Tax      
Unrealized Loss on Securities(0.5)
(0.5)


Unrealized Gain on Derivatives0.1

0.1



Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans(3.0)
(3.0)


Total Comprehensive Income138.1
     
Common Stock Issued163.8



163.8

Dividends Declared(97.9)(97.9)



ESOP Shares Earned7.2


7.2


Balance as of December 31, 20151,822.4
573.3
(24.5)
1,271.4
2.2
Comprehensive Income      
Net Income155.8
155.3



0.5
Other Comprehensive Income – Net of Tax      
Unrealized Loss on Securities(0.2)
(0.2)


Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans(3.5)
(3.5)


Total Comprehensive Income152.1
     
Common Stock Issued35.9



35.9

Common Stock Retired(8.0)


(8.0)
Dividends Declared(102.7)(102.7)



Acquisition of Non-Controlling Interest(6.7)


(4.0)(2.7)
Balance as of December 31, 2016
$1,893.0

$625.9
$(28.2)

$1,295.3

Year Ended December 312019
2018
2017
Millions   
Operating Activities   
Net Income
$185.5

$174.1

$172.2
AFUDC – Equity(2.3)(1.2)(1.2)
Income from Equity Investments – Net of Dividends(5.6)(2.3)(3.2)
Change in Fair Value of Contingent Consideration
(2.0)(0.7)
Deferred Fuel Adjustment Clause Charge

19.5
Loss (Gain) on Sales of Investments and Property, Plant and Equipment(1.7)1.0
0.4
Depreciation Expense200.6
200.1
171.9
Amortization of PSAs(11.6)(23.6)(23.6)
Amortization of Other Intangible Assets and Other Assets13.0
10.4
10.2
Deferred Income Tax Expense (Benefit)(6.7)(15.8)14.4
Share-Based and ESOP Compensation Expense6.3
6.8
6.6
Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Expense1.2
8.6
10.1
Bad Debt Expense(0.1)1.1
0.8
Provision (Payments) for Interim Rate Refund(40.0)16.3
32.3
Provision (Payments) for Tax Reform Refund(10.4)10.7

Gain on Sale of U.S. Water Services(23.6)

Changes in Operating Assets and Liabilities   
Accounts Receivable22.6
(10.7)(8.0)
Inventories(4.1)55.5
11.9
Prepayments and Other0.3
(4.0)(5.3)
Accounts Payable(8.8)13.6
(7.5)
Other Current Liabilities(13.7)6.7
1.8
Cash Contributions to Defined Benefit Pension Plans(10.4)(15.0)(1.7)
Changes in Regulatory and Other Non-Current Assets(25.1)6.7
33.7
Changes in Regulatory and Other Non-Current Liabilities(15.9)(3.9)(31.7)
Cash from Operating Activities249.5
433.1
402.9
Investing Activities   
Proceeds from Sale of Available-for-sale Securities12.1
10.2
10.1
Payments for Purchase of Available-for-sale Securities(12.2)(13.3)(8.6)
Acquisitions of Subsidiaries – Net of Cash and Restricted Cash Acquired

(18.5)
Equity Investments(37.9)(39.2)(7.8)
Return of Capital from Equity Investments8.3


Additions to Property, Plant and Equipment(597.1)(312.4)(208.5)
Proceeds from Sale of U.S. Water Services – Net of Transaction Costs and Cash Retained268.6


Other Investing Activities12.9
5.7
4.3
Cash for Investing Activities(345.3)(349.0)(229.0)
Financing Activities   
Proceeds from Issuance of Common Stock1.9
20.3
86.0
Proceeds from Issuance of Long-Term Debt201.9
75.6
131.5
Repayments of Long-Term Debt(72.2)(95.5)(189.6)
Proceeds from Non-Controlling Interest in Subsidiaries – Net of Issuance Costs103.8


Acquisition-Related Contingent Consideration Payments(3.8)
(19.7)
Dividends on Common Stock(121.4)(115.0)(108.7)
Other Financing Activities(0.9)(0.6)(1.6)
Cash (for) from Financing Activities109.3
(115.2)(102.1)
Change in Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash13.5
(31.1)71.8
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash at Beginning of Period79.0
110.1
38.3
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash at End of Period
$92.5

$79.0

$110.1


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.




ALLETE Consolidated Statement of Equity

 2019
2018
2017
Millions Except Per Share Amounts   
Common Stock   
Balance, Beginning of Period
$1,428.5

$1,401.4

$1,295.3
Common Stock Issued8.2
27.1
106.1
Balance, End of Period1,436.7
1,428.5
1,401.4
    
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss   
Balance, Beginning of Period(27.3)(22.6)(28.2)
Adjustments to Opening Balance – Net of Income Taxes (a)

(5.6)
Other Comprehensive Income – Net of Income Taxes


Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Debt Securities0.2
(0.1)0.9
Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans3.5
1.0
4.7
Balance, End of Period(23.6)(27.3)(22.6)
    
Retained Earnings   
Balance, Beginning of Period754.6
689.4
625.9
Adjustments to Opening Balance – Net of Income Taxes (a)

6.1

Net Income185.6
174.1
172.2
Common Stock Dividends(121.4)(115.0)(108.7)
Balance, End of Period818.8
754.6
689.4
    
Non-Controlling Interest in Subsidiaries   
Balance, Beginning of Period


Proceeds from Non-Controlling Interest in Subsidiaries – Net of Issuance Costs103.8


Net Loss(0.1)

Balance, End of Period103.7


    
Total Equity
$2,335.6

$2,155.8

$2,068.2
    
Dividends Per share of Common Stock
$2.35

$2.24

$2.14
(a)Reflects the impacts associated with the adoption of accounting standards concerning Financial Instruments, Revenue from Contracts with Customers and the Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. (See Note 1. Operations and Significant Accounting Policies.)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS




NOTE 1. OPERATIONS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES


Financial Statement Preparation. References in this report to “we,” “us,” and “our” are to ALLETE and its subsidiaries, collectively. We prepare our financial statements in conformity with GAAP. These principles require management to make informed judgments, best estimates, and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses. Actual results could differ from those estimates.


Subsequent Events. The Company performed an evaluation of subsequent events for potential recognition and disclosure through the time of the financial statements issuance.


Principles of Consolidation. Our Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of ALLETE and, all of our majority‑owned subsidiary companies.companies and variable interest entities of which ALLETE is the primary beneficiary. All material intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.


Variable Interest Entities. The accounting guidance for “Variable Interest Entities” (VIE) is a consolidation model that considers if a company has a variable interest in a VIE. A VIE is a legal entity that possesses any of the following conditions: the entity’s equity at risk is not sufficient to permit the legal entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support, equity owners are unable to direct the activities that most significantly impact the legal entity’s economic performance (or they possess disproportionate voting rights in relation to the economic interest in the legal entity), or the equity owners lack the obligation to absorb the legal entity’s expected losses or the right to receive the legal entity’s expected residual returns. Entities are required to consolidate a VIE when it is determined that they have a controlling financial interest in a VIE and therefore, are the primary beneficiary of that VIE, as defined by the accounting guidance for “Variable Interest Entities.” In determining whether ALLETE is the primary beneficiary of a VIE, management considers whether ALLETE has the power to direct the most significant activities of the VIE and is obligated to absorb losses or receive the expected residual returns that are significant to the VIE. The accounting guidance for VIEs applies to certain ALLETE Clean Energy wind energy facilities. (See Tax Equity Financing.)

Business Segments. We present three3 reportable segments: Regulated Operations, ALLETE Clean Energy and U.S. Water Services. Our segments were determined in accordance with the guidance on segment reporting. We measure performance of our operations through budgeting and monitoring of contributions to consolidated net income by each business segment.


Regulated Operations includes our regulated utilities, Minnesota Power and SWL&P, as well as our investment in ATC, a Wisconsin-based regulated utility that owns and maintains electric transmission assets in partsportions of Wisconsin, Michigan, Minnesota and Illinois. Minnesota Power provides regulated utility electric service in northeastern Minnesota to approximately 145,000 retail customers. Minnesota Power also has 1615 non-affiliated municipal customers in Minnesota. SWL&P is a Wisconsin utility and a wholesale customer of Minnesota Power. SWL&P provides regulated utility electric, natural gas and water service in northwestern Wisconsin to approximately 15,000 electric customers, 13,000 natural gas customers and 10,000 water customers. Our regulated utility operations include retail and wholesale activities under the jurisdiction of state and federal regulatory authorities.


ALLETE Clean Energy focuses on developing, acquiring, and operating clean and renewable energy projects. ALLETE Clean Energy currently owns and operates, in fourfive states, approximately 535660 MW of nameplate capacity wind energy generation that is fromcontracted under PSAs underof various durations. In addition, ALLETE Clean Energy constructed and sold a 107currently has approximately 380 MW of wind energy facilityfacilities under construction that it will own and operate with long-term PSAs in 2015. On January 3, 2017,place. ALLETE Clean Energy announced that it will develop anotheralso engages in the development of wind energy facility of upfacilities to 50 MW after securing a 25‑year PSA. The PSA includes an optionoperate under long-term PSAs or for the counterpartysale to purchase the facilityothers upon development completion; construction is expected to begin in 2018.completion.


U.S. Water Services providesprovided integrated water management for industry by combining chemical, equipment, engineering and service for customized solutions to reduce water and energy usage, and improve efficiency. On March 26, 2019, the Company sold U.S. Water Services to a subsidiary of Kurita Water Industries Ltd. pursuant to a stock purchase agreement for approximately $270 million in cash, net of transaction costs and cash retained.



NOTE 1. OPERATIONS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

Corporate and Otheris comprised of BNI Energy, our investment in Nobles 2, ALLETE Properties, other business development and corporate expenditures, unallocated interest expense, a small amount of non-rate base generation, approximately 5,0004,000 acres of land in Minnesota, and earnings on cash and investments.


BNI Energy a wholly-owned subsidiary, mines and sells lignite coal to two2 North Dakota mine-mouth generating units, one1 of which is Square Butte. In 20162019, Square Butte supplied 50 percent (227.5 MW) of its output to Minnesota Power under long-term contracts. (See Note 11.9. Commitments, Guarantees and Contingencies.)


Our investment in Nobles 2 represents a 49 percent equity interest in Nobles 2, the entity that will own and operate a 250 MW wind energy facility in southwestern Minnesota pursuant to a 20-year PPA with Minnesota Power.

ALLETE Properties represents our legacy Florida real estate investment. Our strategy related toincorporates the real estate assetspossibility of ALLETE Properties is to sell individual parcels over time while also pursuing a bulk sale of ourthe entire ALLETE Properties portfolio. Proceeds from a bulk sale would be strategically deployed to support growth inat our energy infrastructureRegulated Operations and related services businesses.ALLETE Clean Energy. ALLETE Properties continues to pursue sales of individual parcels over time and will continue to maintain key entitlements and infrastructure without making additional investments or acquisitions. (See Note 8. Investments.)infrastructure.


Cash, Cash Equivalents and Cash Equivalents.Restricted Cash. We consider all investments purchased with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. As of December 31, 2019, restricted cash amounts included in Prepayments and Other on the Consolidated Balance Sheet include collateral deposits required under an ALLETE Clean Energy loan agreement. In prior periods presented, the amounts also include U.S. Water Services' standby letters of credit. The restricted cash amounts included in Other Non-Current Assets represent collateral deposits required under an ALLETE Clean Energy loan agreement, PSAs and a tax equity financing agreement. In prior periods presented, the amounts also include deposits from a SWL&P customer in aid of future capital expenditures. The following table provides a reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash reported within the Consolidated Balance Sheet that aggregate to the amounts presented in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows.
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted CashDecember 31,
2019

 December 31,
2018

 December 31,
2017

Millions     
Cash and Cash Equivalents
$69.3
 
$69.1
 
$98.9
Restricted Cash included in Prepayments and Other2.8
 1.3
 2.6
Restricted Cash included in Other Non-Current Assets20.4
 8.6
 8.6
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash on the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
$92.5
 
$79.0
 
$110.1





NOTE 1. OPERATIONS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)


Supplemental Statement of Cash Flow Information.
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows   
Year Ended December 312019
2018
2017
Millions   
Cash Paid During the Period for Interest – Net of Amounts Capitalized
$63.5

$66.0

$64.5
Recognition of Right-of-use Assets and Lease Liabilities (a)

$28.7


Remeasurement of Deferred Income Taxes Resulting from the TCJA   
Increase in Regulatory Assets


$80.9
Decrease in Investment in ATC

$(27.9)
Decrease in Deferred Income Taxes

$(353.6)
Increase in Regulatory Liabilities


$393.6
Noncash Investing and Financing Activities   
Increase (Decrease) in Accounts Payable for Capital Additions to Property, Plant and Equipment$33.9$(0.1)$67.2
Reclassification of Property, Plant and Equipment to Inventory (b)


$46.3

Capitalized Asset Retirement Costs$20.7$14.2$(15.6)
AFUDC–Equity
$2.3

$1.2

$1.2
ALLETE Common Stock Contributed to Pension Plans


$13.5

(a)See Leases.
(b)In February 2018, Montana-Dakota Utilities exercised its option to purchase the Thunder Spirit II wind energy facility upon completion, resulting in a reclassification from Property, Plant and Equipment – Net to Inventories – Net for project costs incurred in the prior year. On the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows, the sale of the wind energy facility in the fourth quarter of 2018 resulted in Operating Activities – Inventories increasing by $46.3 million in 2018 due to the project costs incurred in the prior year.

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows   
Year Ended December 312016
2015
2014
Millions   
Cash Paid During the Period for Interest – Net of Amounts Capitalized
$68.2

$59.0

$51.3
Cash Paid During the Period for Income Taxes
$0.5

$0.4

$5.1
Noncash Investing and Financing Activities   
Increase (Decrease) in Accounts Payable for Capital Additions to Property, Plant and Equipment$(22.0)$(40.6)
$21.7
Capitalized Asset Retirement Costs
$3.7

$12.4
$22.4
Camp Ripley Solar Project Financing
$15.0


AFUDC–Equity
$2.1

$3.3

$7.8
ALLETE Common Stock Contributed to the Defined Benefit Pension Plan

$19.5
Contingent Consideration

$35.7

ALLETE Common Stock Received for Sale of Land Inventory
$8.0


Long-Term Finance Receivable for Land Inventory
$12.0



Accounts Receivable. Accounts receivable are reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheet net of an allowance for doubtful accounts. The allowance is based on our evaluation of the receivable portfolio under current conditions, overall portfolio quality, review of specific problemssituations and such other factors that, in our judgment, deserve recognition in estimating losses.
Accounts Receivable   
As of December 312019
 2018
Millions   
Trade Accounts Receivable (a)
   
Billed
$77.2
 
$121.7
Unbilled20.1
 24.4
Less: Allowance for Doubtful Accounts0.9
 1.7
Total Accounts Receivable
$96.4
 
$144.4

(a)On March 26, 2019, ALLETE sold U.S. Water Services which resulted in the removal of the related accounts receivable from the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Accounts Receivable   
As of December 312016
 2015
Millions   
Trade Accounts Receivable   
Billed
$106.5
 
$105.3
Unbilled19.1
 16.9
Less: Allowance for Doubtful Accounts3.1
 1.0
Total Accounts Receivable
$122.5
 
$121.2

Concentration of Credit Risk. We are subject to concentration of credit risk primarily as a result of accounts receivable. Minnesota Power sells electricity to 98 Large Power Customers. Receivables from these customers totaled $9.5$7.8 million as of December 31, 20162019 ($9.211.7 million atas of December 31, 2015)2018). Minnesota Power does not obtain collateral to support utility receivables, but monitors the credit standing of major customers. In addition, Minnesota Power, as permitted by the MPUC, requires its taconite-producing Large Power Customers to pay weekly for electric usage based on monthly energy usage estimates, which allows us to closely manage collection of amounts due. One of these customers accounted for 812 percent of consolidated operating revenue in 2016 (82019 (10 percent in 2015; 12 percent in 2014)2018 and 2017).



NOTE 1. OPERATIONS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

Long-Term Finance Receivables. Long-term finance receivables relating to our real estate operations are collateralized by property sold, accrue interest at market-based rates and are net of an allowance for doubtful accounts. We assess delinquent finance receivables by comparing the balance of such receivables to the estimated fair value of the collateralized property. If the fair value of the property is less than the finance receivable, we record a reserve for the difference. We estimate fair value based on recent property tax assessed values or current appraisals.


Available-for-Sale Securities. Available-for-sale debt and equity securities are recorded at fair value with unrealizedvalue. Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale debt securities are included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax. Unrealized gains and losses that are other than temporaryon available-for-sale equity securities are recognized in earnings. We use the specific identification method as the basis for determining the cost of securities sold. Our policy is to review available-for-sale securities for other than temporary impairment on a quarterly basis by assessing such factors as the share price trends and the impact of overall market conditions. (See Note 8. Investments.)



NOTE 1. OPERATIONS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

Inventories – Net. Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market.net realizable value. Inventories in our Regulated Operations and ALLETE Clean Energy segmentssegment are carried at an average cost or first-in, first-out basis. Inventories in our U.S. Water ServicesALLETE Clean Energy segment and Corporate and Other businesses are carried at an average cost, first-in, first-out or specific identification basis. Fuel for generation is carried at an average cost basis. Certain other inventories, including capital spares, are carried at specific cost.
Inventories – Net   
As of December 312019
 2018
Millions   
Fuel (a)

$25.9
 
$26.0
Materials and Supplies46.9
 44.2
Raw Materials (b)

 2.8
Work in Progress (b)

 6.1
Finished Goods (b)

 8.4
Reserve for Obsolescence (b)

 (0.8)
Total Inventories – Net
$72.8
 
$86.7
Inventories – Net   
As of December 312016
 2015
Millions   
Fuel (a)

$43.9
 
$58.1
Materials and Supplies48.7
 49.1
Raw Materials2.9
 2.7
Work in Progress1.0
 
Finished Goods8.6
 7.5
Reserve for Obsolescence(0.9) (0.3)
Total Inventories
$104.2
 
$117.1

(a)Fuel consists primarily of coal inventory at Minnesota Power.
(b) On March 26, 2019, ALLETE sold U.S. Water Services which resulted in the removal of the related inventory items from the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Prepayments and Other Current Assets   
As of December 312016
 2015
Millions   
Deferred Fuel Adjustment Clause
$18.6
 
$10.6
Restricted Cash (a)
2.2
 5.6
Other19.5
 19.5
Total Prepayments and Other Current Assets
$40.3
 
$35.7
(a)Restricted Cash includes collateral deposits required under ALLETE Clean Energy’s loan agreements and collateral deposits required for U.S. Water Services’ standby letters of credit.


Property, Plant and Equipment. Property, plant and equipment are recorded at original cost and are reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheet net of accumulated depreciation. Expenditures for additions, significant replacements, improvements and major plant overhauls are capitalized; maintenance and repair costs are expensed as incurred. Gains or losses on non-utility property, plant and equipment for Corporate and Other operations are recognized when they are retired or otherwise disposed. When utility property, plant and equipment in our Regulated Operations and ALLETE Clean Energy segments are retired or otherwise disposed, no gain or loss is recognized in accordance with the accounting standards for component depreciation.depreciation except for certain circumstances where the retirement is unforeseen or unexpected. Our Regulated Operations capitalize AFUDC, which includes both an interest and equity component. AFUDC represents the cost of both debt and equity funds used to finance utility plant additions during construction periods. AFUDC amounts capitalized are included in rate base and are recovered from customers as the related property is depreciated. Upon MPUC approval of cost recovery, the recognition of AFUDC ceases. (See Note 2. Property, Plant and Equipment.)


We believe that long-standing ratemaking practices approved by applicable state and federal regulatory commissions allow for the recovery of the remaining book value of retired plant assets. In 2015, Minnesota Power retired Taconite Harbor Unit 3 and converted Laskin to operate on natural gas which were actions included in Minnesota Power’s MPUC-approved 2013 IRP. In an order dated July 18, 2016, the MPUC approvedgas. Minnesota Power’s 2015 IRP with modifications which contains the nextcontained steps in Minnesota Power’s EnergyForward plan including the economic idling of Taconite Harbor Units 1 and 2 which occurred in September 2016, and the ceasing of coal-fired operations at Taconite Harbor in 2020. (See Note 4. Regulatory Matters.) The MPUC order for the 2015 IRP also directsdirected Minnesota Power to retire Boswell Units 1 and 2 no later than 2022, and on October 19, 2016,2022. Minnesota Power announced thatretired Boswell Units 1 and 2 will be retired in the fourth quarter of 2018. As part of the 2016 general retail rate case, the MPUC allowed recovery of the remaining book value of Boswell Units 1 and 2 through 2022. We do not expect to record any impairment charge as a result of the retirement of Taconite Harbor Unit 3, or Boswell Units 1 and 2, the ceasing of coal-fired operations at Taconite Harbor Units 1 and 2 or the conversion of Laskin.Laskin to operate on natural gas. In addition, we expect to be able to continue depreciating these assets for at least their established remaining useful lives; however, we are unable to predict the impact of regulatory outcomes resulting in changes to their established remaining useful lives. (See Note 4. Regulatory Matters.) The net book values for Taconite Harbor and Boswell Units 1 and 2 as of December 31, 2016, were approximately $90 million and $30 million, respectively. We would seek recovery in a general rate case of additional depreciation expense as a result of material changes in useful lives.




NOTE 1. OPERATIONS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)


ALLETE Clean Energy Asset Acquisition. On May 3, 2019, ALLETE Clean Energy acquired the Diamond Spring wind project in Oklahoma from Apex Clean Energy. ALLETE Clean Energy will build, own and operate the approximately 300 MW wind energy facility. The Diamond Spring wind project is fully contracted to sell wind power under long-term power sales agreements. Construction is expected to be completed in late 2020.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets. We review our long-lived assets which include the legacy real estate assets of ALLETE Properties, for indicators of impairment in accordance with the accounting standards for property, plant and equipment on a quarterly basis. This includes our property, plant and equipment (see Property, Plant and Equipment) and land inventory. Land inventory is accounted for as held for use and is recorded at cost, orunless the carrying value is determined not to be recoverable in accordance with the accounting standards for property, plant and equipment, in which case the land inventory is written down to estimated fair value.


In accordance with the accounting standards for property, plant and equipment, if indicators of impairment exist, we test our long‑lived assets for recoverability by comparing the carrying amount of the asset to the undiscounted future net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. Cash flows are assessed at the lowest level of identifiable cash flows. The undiscounted future net cash flows are impacted by trends and factors known to us at the time they are calculated and our expectations related to: management’s best estimate of future use; sales prices; holding period and timing of sales; method of disposition; and future expenditures necessary to maintain the operations.

Real Estate Assets. In recent years, market conditions for real estate in Florida have required us to review our land inventories for impairment. In 2015, the Company reevaluated its strategy related to the real estate assets of ALLETE Properties in response to market conditions and transaction activity. The revised strategy incorporated the possibility of a bulk sale of its entire portfolio which, if consummated, would likely result in sales proceeds below the book value of the real estate assets. Proceeds from such a sale would be strategically deployed to support growth in our energy infrastructure and related services businesses. ALLETE Properties also continues to pursue sales of individual parcels over time. ALLETE Properties will continue to maintain key entitlements and infrastructure without making additional investments or acquisitions.


In connection with implementing the revised strategy, management evaluated its impairment analysis for its real estate assets using updated assumptions to determine estimated future net cash flows on an undiscounted basis. Estimated fair values were based upon current market data2019, 2018, and pricing for individual parcels. Our impairment analysis incorporates a probability-weighted approach considering the alternative courses of sales noted above.
Based on the results of the 2015 undiscounted cash flow analysis, the undiscounted future net cash flows were not adequate to recover the carrying value of the real estate assets leading to an adjustment of carrying value to estimated fair value. Estimated fair value was derived using Level 3 inputs, including current market interest in the property for a bulk sale of its entire portfolio, and discounted cash flow analysis of estimated selling price for sales over time. As a result, a non-cash impairment charge of $36.3 million was recorded in 2015 to reduce the carrying value of the real estate to its estimated fair value.

In 2016 and 2014, impairment analyses of estimated undiscounted future net cash flows were conducted and indicated that the cash flows were adequate to recover the carrying value of ALLETE Properties real estate assets. As a result, no impairment was recorded in 2016 or 2014.
ALLETE Clean Energy’s Wind Turbine Generators. During our annual impairment assessment of ALLETE Clean Energy’s goodwill (see Goodwill), management determined an impairment of goodwill was required primarily due to lower estimated energy prices in periods not under PSAs. As a result of these lower estimated energy prices in periods not under PSAs, the Company has reviewed ALLETE Clean Energy’s WTGs for impairment. Based on the results of the undiscounted cash flow analysis, the undiscounted future cash flows were adequate to recover the carrying value of the WTGs. The significant assumptions utilized in the undiscounted future cash flows were consistent with those utilized in our annual goodwill impairment assessment. There2017, there were no indicators of impairment for our property, plant, and equipment or land inventory. As a result, 0 impairment was recorded in 20152019, 2018 or 2014.2017.


Derivatives. ALLETE is exposed to certain risks relating to its business operations that can be managed through the use of derivative instruments. ALLETE may enter into derivative instruments to manage those risks including interest rate risk related to certain variable-rate borrowings.

Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. We apply the fair value recognition guidance for share-based payments. Under this guidance, we recognize stock-based compensation expense for all share-based payments granted, net of an estimated forfeiture rate. (See Note 16.13. Employee Stock and Incentive Plans.)
Other Non-Current Assets   
As of December 312019
 2018
Millions   
Contract Assets (a)

$28.0
 
$30.7
Finance Receivable (b)

 10.4
Operating Lease Right-of-use Assets (c)
28.6
 
ALLETE Properties21.9
 24.4
Restricted Cash20.4
 8.6
Other Postretirement Benefit Plans37.5
 0.4
Other80.8
 77.9
Total Other Non-Current Assets
$217.2
 
$152.4
(a)Contract Assets include payments made to customers as an incentive to execute or extend service agreements. The contract payments are being amortized over the term of the respective agreements as a reduction to revenue.
(b)Finance Receivable related to the 2016 sale of Ormond Crossings and Lake Swamp, which was collected in the second quarter of 2019.
(c)See Leases.


NOTE 1. OPERATIONS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

Goodwill and Intangible Assets.

Goodwill. Goodwill is the excess of the purchase price (consideration transferred) over the estimated fair value of net assets of acquired businesses. In accordance with GAAP, goodwill is not amortized. Goodwill is assessed annually in the fourth quarter for impairment and whenever an event occurs or circumstances change that would indicate the carrying amount may be impaired. Impairment testing for goodwill is done at the reporting unit level. As of the date of our annual goodwill impairment testing in 2016, the ALLETE Clean Energy and U.S. Water Services reporting units had positive equity and the Company elected to bypass the qualitative assessment of goodwill for impairment, proceeding directly to the two-step impairment test.

In performing Step 1 of the impairment test, we compare the fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying value including goodwill. If the carrying value including goodwill were to exceed the fair value of a reporting unit, Step 2 of the impairment test test would be performed. Step 2 of the impairment test requires the carrying value of goodwill to be reduced to its fair value, if lower, as of the test date.

ALLETE Clean Energy. Our annual impairment analysis indicated the Step 2 analysis was necessary. Step 2 of the impairment test is performed to measure the impact of the goodwill impairment loss. Step 2 requires that the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill be compared to the carrying amount of that goodwill. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit’s goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess, up to the entire amount of goodwill. After performing Step 2, it was determined that the implied value of goodwill was less than the carrying amount, resulting in a non-cash impairment charge of $3.3 million in 2016, which is presented within Operating Expenses – Other in the Consolidated Statement of Income (none in 2015 or 2014). The impairment charge represented the entire carrying amount of goodwill for ALLETE Clean Energy. The facts and circumstances that led to an impairment of goodwill primarily relate to lower estimated energy prices in periods not under PSAs. The fair value of the reporting unit was determined based on a discounted cash flow model. Significant assumptions in the discounted cash flow model included annual generation, operation and maintenance expenses, income tax rates, discount rates ranging from 8.25 percent to 9.25 percent and forward energy price curves. ALLETE Clean Energy’s goodwill was primarily related to the acquisition of Storm Lake II in January 2014.

U.S. Water Services.For Step 1 of the impairment test, we estimated the reporting unit's fair value using standard valuation techniques, including techniques which use estimates of projected future results and cash flows to be generated by the reporting unit. Such techniques generally include a terminal value that utilizes a growth rate on debt-free cash flows. These cash flow valuations involve a number of estimates that require broad assumptions and significant judgment by management regarding future performance. Our annual impairment test in 2016 indicated that the estimated fair value of U.S. Water Services exceeded its carrying value, and no impairment existed (none in 2015). Significant assumptions in the discounted cash flow model included a discount rate of 10.75 percent, cash flow forecasts through 2021, annual revenue growth rates ranging from 8 percent to 11 percent and a terminal growth rate of 5.0 percent. Forecasted annual revenue growth assumes an increase in market share and growth in the industry. The calculated fair value of equity for the U.S. Water Services reporting unit exceeds carrying value by less than 10 percent. If U.S. Water Services fails to meet expected cash flow forecasts by a nominal margin, the results of future impairment tests could result in an impairment of goodwill. Additionally, an increase in interest rates could have an adverse impact on the discount rate used in the Company’s valuation under the income approach, potentially resulting in an impairment of goodwill.

Intangible Assets.Intangible assets include customer relationships, patents, non-compete agreements and trademarks and trade names. Intangible assets with definite lives consist of customer relationships, which are amortized using an attrition model, and patents and non-compete agreements, which are amortized on a straight-line basis with estimated remaining useful lives ranging from approximately 2 years to approximately 21 years. We review definite-lived intangible assets for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Indefinite-lived intangible assets consist of trademarks and trade names, which are tested for impairment annually in the fourth quarter and whenever an event occurs or circumstances change that would indicate that the carrying amount may be impaired. Impairment is calculated as the excess of the asset’s carrying amount over its fair value. Fair value is generally determined using a discounted cash flow analysis. Our annual impairment test in 2016 indicated that the estimated fair value of trademarks and trade names exceeded the asset carrying values. As a result, no impairment was recorded in 2016 (none in 2015).



NOTE 1. OPERATIONS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
Other Current Liabilities   
As of December 312019
 2018
Millions   
Provision for Interim Rate Refund (a)

 
$40.0
PSAs
$12.3
 12.6
Contract Liabilities (b)

 7.6
Provision for Tax Reform Refund (c)
0.2
 10.7
Contingent Consideration (d)

 3.8
Operating Lease Liabilities (e)
6.9
 
Other41.0
 53.8
Total Other Current Liabilities
$60.4
 
$128.5
(a) Provision for Interim Rate Refund was refunded to Minnesota Power’s retail customers in the second quarter of 2019.
Other Non-Current Assets   
As of December 312016
 2015
Millions   
Contract Payment (a)

$29.6
 
Finance Receivable (b)
11.5
 
Restricted Cash (c)
8.6
 
$8.1
Other56.8
 60.0
Total Other Non-Current Assets
$106.5
 
$68.1
(a)Contract Payment includes a $31.0 million payment made to Cliffs as part of a long-term PSA between Minnesota Power and Silver Bay Power. The contract payment is being amortized over the term of the PSA. (See Note 11. Commitments, Guarantees and Contingencies.)
(b)On September 22, 2016, ALLETE Properties sold its Ormond Crossings project and Lake Swamp wetland mitigation bank for considerationContract Liabilities consist of approximately $21 million. The consideration includeddeposits received as a down payment in the formresult of 0.1 million shares of ALLETE common stockentering into contracts with a value of $8.0 million. The remaining purchase price will be paid under the terms of a finance receivable due over a five-year period which bears interest at market rates and is collateralized by the property sold.our customers prior to completing our performance obligations.
(c)Restricted Cash includes collateral deposits required under ALLETE Clean Energy’s loan agreementsProvision for Tax Reform Refund related to the income tax benefits of the TCJA in 2018 was refunded to Minnesota Power customers in the first quarter of 2019 and PSAs, and deposits fromis being returned to SWL&P customers in aid of future capital expenditures.through 2020.
Other Current Liabilities   
As of December 312016
 2015
Millions   
Customer Deposits
$5.4
 
$15.1
Power Sales Agreements24.6
 23.3
Other43.7
 47.7
Total Other Current Liabilities
$73.7
 
$86.1
Other Non-Current Liabilities   
As of December 312016
 2015
Millions   
Asset Retirement Obligation
$136.6
 
$131.4
Power Sales Agreements113.8
 138.1
Contingent Consideration (a)
25.0
 36.6
Other47.3
 42.9
Total Other Non-Current Liabilities
$322.7
 
$349.0
(a)(d)Contingent Consideration relatesrelated to the estimated fair value of the earnings-based payment resulting from the U.S. Water Services acquisition. (See Note 6. Acquisitions and Note 9. Fair Value.)acquisition was paid in the first quarter of 2019.
(e)See Leases.
Other Non-Current Liabilities   
As of December 312019
 2018
Millions   
Asset Retirement Obligation
$160.3
 
$138.6
PSAs64.6
 76.9
Operating Lease Liabilities (a)
21.8
 
Other46.3
 47.1
Total Other Non-Current Liabilities
$293.0
 
$262.6

(a)See Leases.

Leases.

We determine if a contract is, or contains, a lease at inception and recognize a right-of-use asset and lease liability for all leases with a term greater than 12 months. Our right-of-use assets and lease liabilities for operating leases are included in Other Non-Current Assets, Other Current Liabilities and Other Non-Current Liabilities, respectively, in our Consolidated Balance Sheet. We currently do not have any finance leases.

Right-of-use assets represent our right to use an underlying asset for the lease term and lease liabilities represent the obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. Operating lease right-of-use assets and lease liabilities are recognized at the commencement date based on the estimated present value of lease payments over the lease term. As our leases do not provide an explicit rate, we determine the present value of future lease payments based on our estimated incremental borrowing rate using information available at the lease commencement date. The operating lease right-of-use asset includes lease payments to be made during the lease term and any lease incentives, as applicable.

Our leases may include options to extend or buy out the lease at certain points throughout the term, and if it is reasonably certain that we will exercise that option at lease commencement, we include those rental payments in our calculation of the right-of-use asset and lease liability. Lease and rent expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Leases with a term of 12 months or less are not recognized on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.



NOTE 1. OPERATIONS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
Leases (Continued)

The majority of our operating leases are for heavy equipment, vehicles and land with fixed monthly payments which we group into two categories: Vehicles and Equipment; and Land and Other. Our largest operating lease is for the dragline at BNI Energy which includes a termination payment at the end of the lease term if we do not exercise our purchase option. The amount of this payment is $3 million and is included in our calculation of the right-of-use asset and lease liability recorded. None of our other leases contain residual value guarantees.

Additional information on the components of lease cost and presentation of cash flows were as follows:
December 31, 2019
Millions
Operating Lease Cost
$9.4
Other Information:
Operating Cash Flows From Operating Leases
$9.4


Additional information related to leases was as follows:
December 31, 2019
Millions
Balance Sheet Information Related to Leases:
Other Non-Current Assets
$28.6
Total Operating Lease Right-of-use Assets
$28.6
Other Current Liabilities
$6.9
Other Non-Current Liabilities21.8
Total Operating Lease Liabilities
$28.7
Weighted Average Remaining Lease Term (Years):
Operating Leases - Vehicles and Equipment4
Operating Leases - Land and Other28
Weighted Average Discount Rate:
Operating Leases - Vehicles and Equipment3.7%
Operating Leases - Land and Other4.1%




NOTE 1. OPERATIONS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
Leases (Continued)

Maturities of lease liabilities were as follows:
 December 31, 2019
Millions 
2020
$6.6
20216.0
20225.0
20233.2
20242.9
Thereafter11.5
Total Lease Payments Due35.2
Less: Imputed Interest6.5
Total Lease Obligations28.7
Less: Current Lease Obligations6.9
Total Long-term Lease Obligations
$21.8


Environmental Liabilities. We review environmental matters on a quarterly basis. Accruals for environmental matters are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be reasonably estimated based on current law and existing technologies. Accruals are adjusted as assessment and remediation efforts progress, or as additional technical or legal information becomes available. Accruals for environmental liabilities are included in the Consolidated Balance Sheet at undiscounted amounts and exclude claims for recoveries from insurance or other third parties. Costs related to environmental contamination treatment and cleanup are expensed unless recoverable in rates from customers. (See Note 11.9. Commitments, Guarantees and Contingencies.)

Revenue.

Contracts with Customers Utility includes sales from our regulated operations for generation, transmission and distribution of electric service, and distribution of water and gas services to our customers. Also included is an immaterial amount of regulated steam generation that is used by customers in the production of paper and pulp.

Contracts with Customers Non-utility includes sales of goods and services to customers from ALLETE Clean Energy, U.S. Water Services and our Corporate and Other businesses.

Other Non-utility is the non-cash adjustments to revenue recognized by ALLETE Clean Energy for the amortization of differences between contract prices and estimated market prices for PSAs that were assumed during the acquisition of various wind energy facilities.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue is recognized upon transfer of control of promised goods or services to our customers in an amount that reflects the consideration we expect to receive in exchange for those products or services. Revenue is recognized net of allowance for returns and any taxes collected from customers, which are subsequently remitted to the appropriate governmental authorities. We account for shipping and handling activities that occur after the customer obtains control of goods as a cost rather than an additional performance obligation thereby recognizing revenue at time of shipment and accruing shipping and handling costs when control transfers to our customers. We have a right to consideration from our customers in an amount that corresponds directly with the value to the customer for our performance completed to date; therefore, we may recognize revenue in the amount to which we have a right to invoice.





NOTE 1. OPERATIONS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

Revenue (Continued)

Nature of Revenue Recognition.Streams


Regulated Operations Utility

Residential and Commercial includes sales for electric, gas or water service to customers, who have implied contracts with the utility, under rates are undergoverned by the jurisdiction of Minnesota, Wisconsin and federal regulatory authorities.MPUC, PSCW or FERC. Customers are billed on a monthly cycle basis.basis and revenue is recognized for electric, gas or water service delivered during the billing period. Revenue is accrued for service provided but not yet billed. Regulatedbilled at period end. Performance obligations with these customers are satisfied at time of delivery to customer meters and simultaneously consumed.

Municipal includes sales to 15 non-affiliated municipal customers in Minnesota under long-term wholesale electric contracts. All wholesale electric contracts include a termination clause requiring a three-year notice to terminate. These contracts have termination dates ranging through at least 2032, with a majority of contracts effective through at least 2024. Performance obligations with these customers are satisfied at the time energy is delivered to an agreed upon municipal substation or meter.

Industrial includes sales recognized from contracts with customers in the taconite mining, paper, pulp and secondary wood products, pipeline and other industries. Industrial sales accounted for approximately 54 percent of total regulated utility electric rates include adjustment clauses that: (1) bill or credit customers for fuel and purchased energy costs above or below the base levels in rate schedules; (2) bill retail customerskWh sales for the recoveryyear ended December 31, 2019. Within industrial revenue, Minnesota Power has 8 Large Power Customer contracts, each serving requirements of conservation improvement program expenditures10 MW or more of customer load. These contracts automatically renew past the contract term unless a four-year advanced written notice is given. Large Power Customer contracts have earliest termination dates ranging from 2023 through 2029. We satisfy our performance obligations for these customers at the time energy is delivered to an agreed upon customer substation. Revenue is accrued for energy provided but not collected in base rates; and (3) billyet billed at period end. Based on current contracts with industrial customers, we expect to recognize minimum revenue for the recoveryfixed contract components of approximately $55 million per annum in 2020 through 2023, $20 million in 2024, and $65 million in total thereafter, which reflects the termination notice period in these contracts. When determining minimum revenue, we assume that customer contracts will continue under the contract renewal provision; however, if long-term contracts are renegotiated and subsequently approved by the MPUC or there are changes within our industrial customer class, these amounts may be impacted. Contracts with customers that contain variable pricing or quantity components are excluded from the expected minimum revenue amounts.

Other Power Suppliers includes the sale of energy under long-term PSAs with 2 customers as well as MISO market and liquidation sales. Expiration dates of these PSAs range from 2020 through 2028. Performance obligations with these customers are satisfied at the time energy is delivered to an agreed upon delivery point defined in the contract (generally the MISO pricing node). Based on current contracts with 2 customers, we expect to recognize minimum revenue for fixed contract components of approximately $3 million in 2020. Other power supplier contracts that extend beyond 2020 contain variable pricing components that prevent us from estimating future minimum revenue, and therefore are not included.

Other Revenue includes all remaining individually immaterial revenue streams for Minnesota Power and SWL&P, and is comprised of steam sales to paper and pulp mills, wheeling revenue and other sources. Revenue for steam sales to customers is recognized at the time steam is delivered and simultaneously consumed. Revenue is recognized at the time each performance obligation is satisfied.

CIP Financial Incentive reflects certain revenue that is a result of the achievement of certain transmission, renewable, and environmental improvement expenditures. Fuel and purchased power expense is deferred to match the period in which theobjectives for our CIP financial incentives. This revenue for fuel and purchased power expense is billed to customers pursuant to the fuel adjustment clause.

Revenue from cost recovery riders (transmission, renewable and environmental improvement) is accounted for in accordance with the accounting standards for alternative revenue programs. These standardsprograms which allow for recognizingthe recognition of revenue under an alternative revenue program if the program is established by an order from the utility’s regulatory commission, the order allows for automatic adjustment of future rates, the amount of the revenue recognized is objectively determinable and probable of recovery, and the revenue will be collected within 24 months following the end of the annual period in which it is recognized. RevenueCIP financial incentives are recognized usingin the alternative revenue program guidanceperiod in which the MPUC approves the filing, which is included in Operating Revenue on the Consolidated Statement of Income and Regulatory Assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet until it is subsequently collected from customers.typically mid-year.


Minnesota Power participates in MISO. MISO transactions are accounted for on a net hourly basis in each of the day-ahead and real-time markets. Minnesota Power records net sales in Operating
NOTE 1. OPERATIONS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
Revenue and net purchases in Fuel and Purchased Power expense on the Consolidated Statement of Income.(Continued)


Non-utility

ALLETE Clean Energy recognizes

Long-term PSA revenue includes all sales recognized under long-term contracts for production, curtailment, capacity and associated renewable energy credits from ALLETE Clean Energy wind energy facilities. Expiration dates of these PSAs range from 2020 through 2039. Performance obligations for these contracts are satisfied at the sale oftime energy from PSAs under various durations. Revenue is recognized when delivered to an agreed upon point, or production is curtailed at the request of its customersthe customer, at specified prices. Revenue from the sale of renewable energy credits is recognized at the same time the related energy is delivered to the customer when sold to the same party.

Sale of Wind Energy Facility includes revenue recognized for the design, development, construction, and sale of a wind energy facility to a customer. Performance obligations for these types of agreements are satisfied at the time the completed project is transferred to the customer at the commercial operation date. Revenue from the sale of a wind energy facility is recognized at the time of asset transfer.

Other is the non-cash adjustments to revenue recognized by ALLETE Clean Energy for the amortization of differences between contract prices and estimated market prices on assumed PSAs. As part of wind energy facilitiesfacility acquisitions, in 2014 and 2015, ALLETE Clean Energy assumed various PSAs that were above or below estimated market prices at the time of acquisition and amortizesacquisition; the resulting differences between contract prices and estimated market prices are amortized to Operating Revenue. In 2016, we recognized $22.3 million of non-cash revenue amortization relating toover the difference between contract prices and estimated market prices as an increase in Operating Revenue on the Consolidated Statement of Income ($23.2 million in 2015; $12.7 million in 2014).remaining PSA term.


U.S. Water Services recognizes

Point-in-time revenue fromis recognized for purchases by customers for chemicals, consumable equipment (e.g., filters, pumps and valves) or related maintenance and repair services as the sale of products when the earnings process is complete. This generally occurs when productscustomer’s usage and needs change over time. These goods and services are purchased on an as-needed basis by customers and therefore revenue can be variable. Products are shipped to the customercustomers in accordance with the contract orterms of each purchase order, ownership and riskperformance obligations are satisfied at the time of loss have passedshipment of goods or when services are rendered to the customer.

Contract includes monthly revenue from contracts with customers to provide chemicals, consumable equipment and services to meet customer collectibilityneeds during the contract period. As agreed with the customer, a fixed amount is reasonably assured,invoiced based on the goods and pricingservices to be provided under the contract. The duration of these contracts generally range in length from three months to five years and automatically renew. A 30-day notice is fixedrequired to terminate such contracts without penalty. Performance obligations are satisfied during the period as goods and determinable. Revenue from services is recognizedservice are delivered in accordance with the terms of the contract.

Capital Project includes the sale of equipment and other components assembled to create a water treatment system for a customer. These projects are provided under contracts at an agreed upon price to meet a customer's specifications and typically take less than one year to complete. In general, progress payments are received throughout the project period and are recorded as contract liabilities until performance obligations are satisfied at the servicestime the equipment and other components are performed.delivered to the customer’s site.


Corporate and Other


BNI Energy recognizesLong-term Contract encompasses the sale and delivery of coal sales when deliveredto customer generation facilities. Revenue is recognized on a monthly basis at the cost of production plus a specified profit per ton of coal delivered.delivered to the customer. Coal sales are secured under long-term coal supply agreements extending through 2037. Performance obligations are satisfied during the period as coal is delivered to customer generation facilities.


ALLETE Properties records full profit recognition on salesOther primarily includes revenue from BNI Energy unrelated to coal, the sale of real estate upon closing, providedfrom ALLETE Properties, and non‑rate base steam generation that cash collectionsis sold for use during production of paper and pulp. Performance obligations are at least 20 percent ofsatisfied when control transfers to the contract price and the other requirements under the guidance for sales of real estate are met. From time to time, certain contracts with customers allow us to receive participation revenue from land sales to third parties if various formula-based criteria are achieved.customer.

Operating Expenses – Other   
Year Ended December 312016
2015
2014
Millions   
Impairment of Real Estate (a)


$36.3

Impairment of Goodwill (b)

$3.3


Change in Fair Value of Contingent Consideration (c)
(13.6)

Total Operating Expenses – Other$(10.3)
$36.3

(a)See Impairment of Long-Lived Assets.
(b)See Goodwill and Intangible Assets.
(c)See Note 9. Fair Value.



NOTE 1. OPERATIONS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

Revenue (Continued)

Payment Terms

Payment terms and conditions vary across our businesses. Aside from taconite-producing Large Power Customers, payment terms generally require payment to be made within 15 to 30 days from the end of the period that the service has been rendered or goods provided. In the case of its taconite-producing Large Power Customers, as permitted by the MPUC, Minnesota Power requires weekly payments for electric usage based on monthly energy usage estimates. These customers receive estimated bills based on Minnesota Power’s estimate of the customers’ energy usage, forecasted energy prices and fuel adjustment clause estimates. Minnesota Power’s taconite-producing Large Power Customers have generally predictable energy usage on a weekly basis and any differences that occur are trued-up the following month. Due to the timing difference of revenue recognition from the timing of invoicing and payment, the customer receives credit for the time value of money; however, we have determined that our contracts do not include a significant financing component as the period between when we transfer the service to the customer and when they pay for such service is minimal.

Assets Recognized From the Costs to Obtain a Contract with a Customer

We recognize as an asset the incremental costs of obtaining a contract with a customer if we expect the benefit of those costs to be longer than one year. We expense incremental costs when the asset that would have resulted from capitalizing these costs would have been amortized in one year or less. As of December 31, 2019, we have $28.0 million of assets recognized for costs incurred to obtain contracts with our customers ($30.7 million as of December 31, 2018). Management determined the amount of costs to be recognized as assets based on actual costs incurred and paid to obtain and fulfill these contracts to provide goods and services to our customers. Assets recognized to obtain contracts are amortized on a straight-line basis over the contract term as a non-cash reduction to revenue. We recognized $2.6 million of non-cash amortization for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.
Operating Expenses – Other   
Year Ended December 31201920182017
Millions   
Change in Fair Value of Contingent Consideration (a)
$(2.0)$(0.7)
Total Operating Expenses – Other$(2.0)$(0.7)

(a)Contingent Consideration related to the earnings-based payment resulting from the U.S. Water Services acquisition was paid in the first quarter of 2019. (See Note 7. Fair Value.)

Unamortized Discount and Premium on Debt. Discount and premium on debt are deferred and amortized over the terms of the related debt instruments using a method which approximates the effective interest method.

Tax Equity Financings. In the fourth quarter of 2019, certain subsidiaries of ALLETE entered into tax equity financings that include forming limited liability companies (LLC) with third-party investors for certain wind projects. Tax equity financings have specific terms that dictate distributions of cash and the allocation of tax attributes among the partners, who are divided into two categories: the sponsor and third-party investor. ALLETE subsidiaries are the sponsors in these tax equity financings. The distributions of cash and allocation of tax attributes in these financings are generally different than the underlying percentage ownership interests in the related LLC. A disproportionate share of tax attributes (including accelerated depreciation and production tax credits) are allocated to third-party investors in order to achieve targeted after-tax rates of return, or target yield, from project operations, while a disproportionate share of cash distributions are made to the sponsor.

The target yield and terms vary by financing agreement, by third-party investor, and sponsor project. Once the third-party investor’s target yield has been achieved, a “flip point” is recognized. Prior to the flip point, tax attributes are disproportionately allocated to the third-party investor with cash distributions disproportionately made to the sponsor. In addition, cash distributions can be temporarily increased to the third-party investors in order to meet cumulative distribution thresholds. After the flip point, tax attributes and cash distributions are both typically disproportionately allocated to the sponsor.

Tax equity financings impose a range of affirmative and negative covenants that are similar to what a project lender would require, such as financial reporting, insurance, maintenance and prudent operator standards. Most of these restrictions end once the flip point occurs and any other obligations of the third-party investor have been eliminated.



NOTE 1. OPERATIONS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
Tax Equity Financings (Continued)

The third-party investor’s portion of equity ownership in tax equity LLC is recorded as non-controlling interest in subsidiaries on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Non-Controlling Interest in Subsidiaries. Non-controlling interest in subsidiaries represents the portion of equity ownership, net income (loss), and comprehensive income (loss) in subsidiaries that is not attributable to equity holders of ALLETE.

For those wind projects with tax equity financing structures where the economic benefits are not allocated based on the underlying ownership percentage interests, we have determined that the appropriate methodology for calculating the non-controlling interest in subsidiaries balance is the hypothetical liquidation at book value (HLBV) method. The HLBV method is a balance sheet approach which reflects the substantive economic arrangements in the tax equity financing structures.

Under the HLBV method, amounts reported as non-controlling interest in subsidiaries on the Consolidated Balance Sheet represent the amounts the third-party investors would hypothetically receive at each balance sheet reporting date under the liquidation provisions of the LLC operating agreements, assuming the net assets of the wind projects were liquidated at amounts determined in accordance with GAAP and distributed to the third-party investor and sponsor. The resulting non-controlling interest in subsidiaries balance in these projects is reported as a component of equity on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

The results of operations for these projects attributable to non-controlling interests under the HLBV method is determined as the difference in non-controlling interest in subsidiaries on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at the start and end of each reporting period, after taking into account any capital transactions between the projects and the third-party investors.

Factors used in the HLBV calculation include GAAP income, taxable income (loss), tax attributes such as accelerated depreciation and production tax credits, capital contributions, cash distributions, and the stipulated third-party investor target after-tax return specified in the tax equity LLC operating agreements. Changes in these factors could have a significant impact on the amounts that third-party investors and sponsors would receive upon a hypothetical liquidation. The use of the HLBV method to allocate income to the non-controlling interest in subsidiaries may create variability in our results of operations as the application of the HLBV method can drive variability in net income or loss attributable to non-controlling interest in subsidiaries from period to period.

Other Income (Expense) - Other   
Year Ended December 312019
2018
2017
Millions   
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plan Non-Service Credit (a)

$7.7

$4.6

$3.9
Interest and Investment Earnings4.4
0.5
1.8
AFUDC - Equity2.3
1.2
1.2
Gain (Loss) on Land Sales2.1
0.9
(0.5)
Other2.2
0.6
(0.1)
Total Other Income (Expense) - Other
$18.7

$7.8

$6.3
(a)These are components of net periodic pension and other postretirement benefit cost other than service cost. (See Note 12. Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans.)

Income Taxes. ALLETE and its subsidiaries file a consolidated federal income tax return as well as combined and separate state income tax returns. We account for income taxes using the liability method in accordance with the accounting standardsGAAP for income taxes. Under the liability method, deferred income tax assets and liabilities are established for all temporary differences in the book and tax basis of assets and liabilities, based upon enacted tax laws and rates applicable to the periods in which the taxes become payable.


Due to the effects of regulation on Minnesota Power and SWL&P, certain adjustments made to deferred income taxes are, in turn, recorded as regulatory assets or liabilities. Federal investment tax credits have been recorded as deferred credits and are being amortized to income tax expense over the service lives of the related property. In accordance with the accounting standardsGAAP for uncertainty in income taxes, we are required to recognize in our financial statements the largest tax benefit of a tax position that is “more-likely-than-not”“more‑likely‑than‑not” to be sustained on audit, based solely on the technical merits of the position as of the reporting date. The term “more-likely-than-not”“more‑likely‑than‑not” means more than 50 percent likely. (See Note 13.11. Income Tax Expense.)



NOTE 1. OPERATIONS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

Excise Taxes. We collect excise taxes from our customers levied by government entities. These taxes are stated separately on the billing to the customer and recorded as a liability to be remitted to the government entity. We account for the collection and payment of these taxes on a net basis.

Purchase Accounting. In accordance with the authoritative accounting guidance, the purchase price of an acquired business is generally allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at their estimated fair values on the date of acquisition. Any unallocated purchase price amount is recognized as goodwill on the Consolidated Balance Sheet if it exceeds the estimated fair value and as a bargain purchase gain on the Consolidated Income Statement if it is below the estimated fair value. Determining the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed requires management’s judgment, and the utilization of independent valuation experts as well as the use of significant estimates and assumptions with respect to the timing and amounts of future cash inflows and outflows, discount rates, market prices and asset lives, among other items. The judgments made in the determination of the estimated fair value assigned to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, as well as the estimated useful life of each asset and the duration of each liability, can materially impact the financial statements in periods after acquisition, such as through depreciation and amortization expense. (See Note 6. Acquisitions.)


New Accounting Standards.Pronouncements.


Revenue from Contracts with Customers.Recently Adopted Pronouncements

Disclosure Update and Simplification. In May 2014,November 2018, the FASB issued amended revenue recognition guidanceSEC adopted amendments to clarifycertain disclosure requirements. The amendments adopted include requirements that interim financial statements should include comparative statements for the principlessame period in the prior financial year, except that the requirement for recognizing revenue from contracts with customers. The guidance requires an entity to recognize revenue to depictcomparative balance sheet information may be satisfied by presenting the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflectsyear-end balance sheet. It further includes a requirement analyzing the consideration to which an entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The guidance also requires expanded disclosures relating to the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. Additionally, qualitative and quantitative disclosures are required regarding customer contracts, significant judgments and changes in judgments, and assets recognized fromeach caption of shareholders’ equity either separately in a note or on the costs to obtain or fulfill a contract. The Company is considering the impactface of the new guidance on its ability to recognize revenue from certain contracts where collectibility is in question, its accounting for contributions in aid of construction, bundled sales contracts and contracts with pricing provisions that may require it to recognize revenue at prices other than the contract price (e.g., straight line or estimated future market prices). The guidance isfinancial statement. These amendments were effective for the Company beginningALLETE in the first quarter of 2018 with early adoption permitted. The Company plans to adopt this guidance for our fiscal year beginning January 1, 2018.

Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis. In February 2015, the FASB issued revised guidance which changes the analysis that a reporting entity must perform to determine whether it should consolidate certain types of legal entities. The new standard affects (1) limited partnerships and similar legal entities, (2) evaluating fees paid to a decision maker or a service provider as a variable interest, (3) the effect of fee arrangements on the primary beneficiary determination, (4) the effect of related parties on the primary beneficiary determination, and (5) certain investment funds. This guidance was adopted in the first quarter of 2016 and did not2019. We have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.


NOTE 1. OPERATIONS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
New Accounting Standards (Continued)

Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs. In April 2015, the FASB issued revised guidance addressingincluded the presentation requirements for debt issuance costs. Under the revised guidance, all costs incurredof our Statement of Shareholders’ Equity to issue debt are to be presented on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability. This guidance was adopted in the first quarter of 2016 resulting in the reclassification of unamortized debt issuance costs from Other Non-Current Assets to Long-Term Debt on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The effect of the adoption decreased Total Assets and Total Liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet by $12.6 million as of December 31, 2015.meet these requirements.


Disclosures for Investments in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or Its Equivalent).Leases. In May 2015, the FASB issued an accounting standard update which removes the requirement to categorize within the fair value hierarchy all investments for which fair value is measured using the net asset value per share (or its equivalent) practical expedient. The guidance applies to investments for which there is not a readily determinable fair value (market quote) or the investment is in a mutual fund without a publicly available net asset value. This guidance was adopted in the first quarter of 2016 and did not have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory. In July 2015, the FASB issued an accounting standard which requires entities that measure inventory using the first-in, first-out or average cost methods to measure inventory at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Net realizable value is defined as estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal and transportation. This accounting guidance is effective for the Company beginning in the first quarter of 2017; early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this update is not expected to have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

Leases. In February 2016, the FASB issued an accounting standard update which revisesrevised the existing guidance for leases. Under the revised guidance, lessees will beare required to recognize a “right-of-use” assetright-of-use assets and a lease liabilityliabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet for all leases with a termterms greater than 12 months. The new standard also requires additional quantitativequalitative and qualitativequantitative disclosures by lessees and lessors to enable users of the financial statements to assess the amount, timing and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. The accounting for leases by lessors and the recognition, measurement and presentation of expenses and cash flows from leases areis not expected to significantly change as a result of the updatednew guidance. The revisedCompany adopted this guidance is effective for the Company beginning in the first quarter of 2019 with earlyusing the optional transition method and the package of practical expedients, which allowed for the adoption permitted. The Company is evaluating the impact of the amended lease guidance onstandard as of January 1, 2019, without restating previously disclosed information. Management elected the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

Improvementsoptional transition method of adoption due to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. In March 2016, the FASB issued guidance to simplifyoverall immateriality of the accounting for share-based payment transactions by requiring all excess tax benefits and deficiencies to be recognized in income tax expense or benefit in earnings, thus eliminating the requirement to classify the excess tax benefit and deficiencies as additional paid-in capital. Under the new guidance, an entity makes an accounting policy election to either estimate the expected forfeiture awards or account for forfeitures as they occur. This accounting guidance is effective for the Company beginningbalance sheet gross up in the first quarterperiod of 2017.adoption. The adoptionpackage of this guidance is expectedpractical expedients allowed management to resultnot reassess the lease classification for leases, including those that had expired during the periods presented or that still existed at the time of adoption. We have included additional disclosures in a less than $1 million impact to income tax expense (benefit) annually.

Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments. In August 2016, the FASB issued an accounting standard update which addresses the following eight specific cash flow issues: debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs; settlement of zero-coupon debt instruments or other debt instruments with coupon interest rates that are insignificant in relationnotes to the effective interest rate of the borrowing; contingent consideration payments made after a business combination; proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims; proceeds from the settlement of corporate-owned life insurance policies (including bank-owned life insurance policies); distributions received from equity method investees; beneficial interests in securitization transactions; and separately identifiable cash flows and application of the predominance principle. This accounting guidance is effective for the Company beginning in the first quarter of 2018. The Company plans to adopt this guidance for our fiscal year beginning January 1, 2018, and the guidance will result in changes to the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows relating to debt prepayments, contingent consideration payments, proceeds from insurance settlements, proceeds from corporate-owned life insurance policies and distributions received from equity method investees.consolidated financial statements.



NOTE 1. OPERATIONS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
New Accounting Standards (Continued)

Statement of Cash Flows: Restricted Cash. In November 2016, the FASB issued an accounting standard update related to the presentation of restricted cash in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows. The update requires that the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows explain the change during the period in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash. Restricted cash should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows. This accounting guidance is effective for the Company beginning in the first quarter of 2018. The Company plans to adopt this guidance for our fiscal year beginning January 1, 2018, and the guidance will result in changes to the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows such that restricted cash amounts will be included in the beginning-of-period and end-of-period cash and cash equivalents totals.

Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. In January 2017, the FASB issued an accounting standard update to simplify the accounting for goodwill impairment. The guidance removes Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test, which requires a hypothetical purchase price allocation. The guidance requires a goodwill impairment to be measured as the amount by which a reporting unit’s carrying value exceeds its fair value, not to exceed the carrying amount of goodwill. The accounting guidance is effective for the Company beginning in the first quarter of 2020, with early adoption permitted on a prospective basis. The Company is evaluating the impact of the amended guidance on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.





NOTE 2. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Property, Plant and Equipment   
As of December 312019
 2018
Millions   
Regulated Operations   
Property, Plant and Equipment in Service
$4,555.8
 
$4,490.6
Construction Work in Progress383.6
 251.1
Accumulated Depreciation(1,635.3) (1,549.6)
Regulated Operations – Net3,304.1
 3,192.1
ALLETE Clean Energy   
Property, Plant and Equipment in Service686.0
 488.4
Construction Work in Progress351.3
 164.5
Accumulated Depreciation(86.8) (73.0)
ALLETE Clean Energy – Net950.5
 579.9
U.S. Water Services (a)
   
Property, Plant and Equipment in Service
 30.1
Accumulated Depreciation
 (14.0)
U.S. Water Services – Net
 16.1
Corporate and Other (b)
   
Property, Plant and Equipment in Service231.9
 214.3
Construction Work in Progress3.8
 6.6
Accumulated Depreciation(113.3) (104.6)
Corporate and Other – Net122.4
 116.3
Property, Plant and Equipment – Net
$4,377.0
 
$3,904.4
Property, Plant and Equipment   
As of December 312016
 2015
Millions   
Regulated Operations   
Property, Plant and Equipment in Service
$4,437.0
 
$4,336.7
Construction Work in Progress84.2
 101.2
Accumulated Depreciation(1,426.1) (1,323.8)
Regulated Operations – Net3,095.1
 3,114.1
ALLETE Clean Energy   
Property, Plant and Equipment in Service472.3
 467.3
Construction Work in Progress (a)
101.0
 4.0
Accumulated Depreciation(41.0) (24.0)
ALLETE Clean Energy – Net532.3
 447.3
U.S. Water Services   
Property, Plant and Equipment in Service19.5
 15.6
Accumulated Depreciation(6.9) (3.4)
U.S. Water Services – Net12.6
 12.2
Corporate and Other (b)
   
Property, Plant and Equipment in Service179.8
 165.6
Construction Work in Progress2.8
 4.5
Accumulated Depreciation(81.4) (74.6)
Corporate and Other – Net101.2
 95.5
Property, Plant and Equipment – Net
$3,741.2
 
$3,669.1

(a)The increase inOn March 26, 2019, ALLETE Clean Energy’s construction work in progress primarily relates to deposits for WTGs. The WTGs will be utilized as ALLETE Clean Energy develops future projects.completed the sale of U.S. Water Services. (See Note 1. Operations and Significant Accounting Policies.)
(b)Primarily includes BNI Energy and a small amount of non-rate base generation.


Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the various classes of assets.


NOTE 2. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT (Continued)
Estimated Useful Lives of Property, Plant and Equipment (Years)
Regulated Operations  
ALLETE Clean Energy (a)
5 to 35 years
   Generation104 to 50 years U.S. Water ServicesALLETE Clean Energy35 to 39 years35
   Transmission4452 to 67 years71 Corporate and Other3 to 47 years50
   Distribution1819 to 65 years68   
(a)ALLETE Clean Energy’s Property, Plant and Equipment consists primarily of WTGs with estimated useful lives ranging from 30 years to 35 years.



Asset Retirement Obligations. We recognize, at fair value, obligations associated with the retirement of certain tangible, long‑lived assets that result from the acquisition, construction, development or normal operation of the asset. Asset retirement obligations (AROs) relate primarily to the decommissioning of our coal-fired and wind energy facilities, and land reclamation at BNI Energy. AROs are included in Other Non-Current Liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The associated retirement costs are capitalized as part of the related long-lived asset and depreciated over the useful life of the asset. Removal costs associated with certain distribution and transmission assets have not been recognized, as these facilities have indeterminate useful lives.


Conditional asset retirement obligations have been identified for treated wood poles and remaining polychlorinated biphenyl and asbestos-containing assets; however, the period of remediation is indeterminable and removal costsliabilities have not been recognized because they are considered immaterial to our Consolidated Financial Statements.recognized.


Long-standing ratemaking practices approved by applicable state and federal regulatory commissionsauthorities have allowed provisions for future plant removal costs in depreciation rates. These plant removal cost recoveries are classified either as AROs or as a regulatory liability for non-AROs. To the extent annual accruals for plant removal costs differ from accruals under approved depreciation rates, a regulatory asset has been established in accordance with the guidanceGAAP for AROs. (See Note 4. Regulatory Matters.)


NOTE 2. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT (Continued)
Asset Retirement Obligations  
Millions  
Obligation as of December 31, 20142017 

$109.2122.7

Accretion 7.37.0
Liabilities Recognized (a)
5.1

Liabilities Settled (2.65.3)
Revisions in Estimated Cash Flows 12.414.2

Obligation as of December 31, 20152018 131.4138.6

Accretion 8.07.2

Liabilities Recognized1.4
Liabilities Settled (6.54.6)
Revisions in Estimated Cash Flows 3.717.7

Obligation as of December 31, 20162019 

$136.6160.3

(a)The increase in 2015 is related to the ALLETE Clean Energy wind energy facilities acquisitions in 2015. (See Note 6. Acquisitions.)





NOTE 3. JOINTLY-OWNED FACILITIES AND PROJECTSASSETS


Boswell Unit 4. Minnesota Power owns 80 percent of the 585 MW Boswell Unit 4. While Minnesota Power operates the plant, certain decisions about the operations of Boswell Unit 4 are subject to the oversight of a committee on which it and WPPI Energy, the owner of the remaining 20 percent,, have equal representation and voting rights. Each owner must provide its own financing and is obligated to its ownership share of operating costs. Minnesota Power’s share of operating expenses for Boswell Unit 4 is included in Operating Expenses on the Consolidated Statement of Income.


CapX2020. Minnesota Power iswas a participant in the CapX2020 initiative which representsrepresented an effort to ensure electric transmission and distribution reliability in Minnesota and the surrounding region for the future. CapX2020, which consistsconsisted of electric cooperatives and municipal and investor-owned utilities, including Minnesota’s largest transmission owners, assessed the transmission system and projected growth in customer demand for electricity through 2020. Minnesota Power participated in threecertain CapX2020 projects which were completed and placed in service in 2011, 2012 andby 2015.


NOTE 3. JOINTLY-OWNED FACILITIES AND PROJECTS (Continued)


Minnesota Power’s investments in jointly-owned facilities and projectsassets and the related ownership percentages are as follows:
Regulated Utility PlantPlant in ServiceAccumulated DepreciationConstruction Work in Progress% Ownership
Millions    
As of December 31, 2019    
Boswell Unit 4
$662.7

$258.9

$5.7
80
CapX2020101.0
13.5

9.3 - 14.7
Total
$763.7

$272.4

$5.7
 
As of December 31, 2018    
Boswell Unit 4
$650.1

$229.9

$6.4
80
CapX2020101.0
11.0

9.3 - 14.7
Total
$751.1

$240.9

$6.4
 

Regulated Utility PlantPlant in ServiceAccumulated DepreciationConstruction Work in Progress% Ownership
Millions    
As of December 31, 2016    
Boswell Unit 4
$668.1

$211.2

$8.1
80
CapX2020 Projects101.2
5.9

9.3 - 14.7
Total
$769.3

$217.1

$8.1
 
As of December 31, 2015    
Boswell Unit 4
$668.2

$195.0

$6.9
80
CapX2020 Projects101.1
3.4

9.3 - 14.7
Total
$769.3

$198.4

$6.9
 






NOTE 4. REGULATORY MATTERS


Electric Rates. Entities within our Regulated Operations segment file for periodic rate revisions with the MPUC, FERC and PSCW.

2010 Minnesota General Rate Case. Minnesota Power’s current retail rates are based on a 2011 MPUC retail rate order that allows for a 10.38 percent return on common equity and a 54.29 percent equity ratio.PSCW or FERC. As authorized by the MPUC, Minnesota Power also recognizes revenue under cost recovery riders for transmission, renewable and environmental investments and expenditures. (See Transmission Cost Recovery Rider, Renewable Cost Recovery Rider and Environmental Improvement Rider.) Revenue from cost recovery riders was $97.1$31.8 million in 20162019 ($89.6103.8 million in 2015; $71.82018; $96.9 million in 2014)2017). With the implementation of final rates in Minnesota Power’s general rate case, certain revenue previously recognized under cost recovery riders was incorporated into base rates. (See 2016 Minnesota General Rate Case.)


2016 Minnesota General Rate Case. The MPUC issued a March 2018 order in Minnesota Power’s general rate case approving a return on common equity of 9.25 percent and a 53.81 percent equity ratio. Final rates went into effect on December 1, 2018, which results in additional revenue of approximately $13 million on an annualized basis.

2020 Minnesota General Rate Case. On November 2, 2016,1, 2019, Minnesota Power filed a retail rate increase request with the MPUC seeking an average increase of approximately 910.6 percent for retail customers. The rate filing seeks a return on equity of 10.2510.05 percent and a 53.853.81 percent equity ratio. On an annualized basis, the requested final rate increase would generate approximately $55$66 million in additional revenue. On December 12, 2016, due to a change in its electric sales forecast, Minnesota Power filed a request to modify its original interim rate proposal reducing its requested interim rate increase to $34.7 million from the original request of approximately $49 million; Minnesota Power will file to update its final retail rate increase request by February 28, 2017, and expects the final retail rate increase request to decrease similar to the interim rate proposal. In orders dated December 30, 2016,23, 2019, the MPUC accepted the filing as complete and authorized an annual interim rate increase of $34.7$36.1 million beginning January 1, 2017. As part of this rate increase request, we are seeking an extension of the recovery period for Boswell to better reflect recent environmental investments at the facility and mitigate rate increases for our customers. If approved, annual depreciation expense will be reduced by approximately $25 million. If the requested recovery period extension is not approved, we would expect final rates to be increased by a similar amount. We cannot predict the level of final rates that may be authorized by the MPUC.2020.


Energy-Intensive Trade-Exposed (EITE) Customer Rates. The Minnesota Legislature enacted EITE customer ratemaking law in June 2015 which established that it is the energy policy of the state to have competitive rates for certain industries such as mining and forest products. In November 2015, Minnesota Power filed a rate schedule petition with the MPUC for EITE customers and a corresponding rider for EITE cost recovery. The rate proposal was revenue and cash flow neutral to Minnesota Power. In an order dated March 23, 2016, the MPUC dismissed the petition without prejudice, providing Minnesota Power the option to refile the petition with additional information or file a new petition. On June 30, 2016, Minnesota Power filed a revised EITE petition with the MPUC which included additional information on the net benefits analysis, limits on eligible customers and term lengths for the EITE discount. In an order dated December 21, 2016, the MPUC approved a reduction in rates for EITE customers and determined that cost recovery will be addressed in a separate proceeding. Minnesota Power provided additional information on cost recovery allocation methods in a December 30, 2016, compliance filing.

FERC-Approved Wholesale Rates. Minnesota Power has 1615 non-affiliated municipal customers in Minnesota. SWL&P is a Wisconsin utility and a wholesale customer of Minnesota Power. All wholesale contracts include a termination clause requiring a three-year3-year notice to terminate.




NOTE 4. REGULATORY MATTERS (Continued)
Electric Rates (Continued)

In April 2015, Minnesota Power amended its formula-basedPower’s wholesale electric sales contract with the Nashwauk Public Utilities Commission extending the termis effective through June 30, 2028.at least December 31, 2032. No termination notice may be given for this contract prior to June 30, 2025.July 1, 2029. The wholesale electric service agreementscontract with SWL&P and one other municipal customer areis effective through January 31, 2020 and June 30, 2019, respectively.at least February 28, 2023. Under the agreement with SWL&P, no termination notice may be given prior to January 31, 2017. The other municipal customer provided termination notice for its contract on June 30, 2016. Minnesota Power currently provides approximately 29 MW of average monthly demand to this customer.has been given. The rates included in these three2 contracts are set each July 1 based on a cost-based formula methodology, using estimated costs and a rate of return that is equal to Minnesota Power’s authorized rate of return for Minnesota retail customers (currently 10.38 percent).customers. The formula-based rate methodology also provides for a yearly true-up calculation for actual costs incurred.


In September 2015, Minnesota Power amended itsPower’s wholesale electric contracts with 14 municipal customers extending the contract termsare effective through December 31, 2024.varying dates ranging from 2024 through 2029. No termination notices may be given prior to December 31, 2021.three years before maturity. These contracts includehad fixed capacity charges through 2018; beginning in 2019, the capacity charge will not increase by more than two percent or decrease by more than one percentis determined using a cost-based formula methodology with limits on the annual change from the previous year’s capacity charge and will be determined using a cost-based formula methodology.charge. The base energy charge for each year of the contract term will beis set each January 1, subject to monthly adjustment, and will also beis determined using a cost-based formula methodology.


The contract with another municipal customer expired on June 30, 2019. Minnesota Power historically provided approximately 29 MW of average monthly demand to this customer.

Transmission Cost Recovery Rider.Rider. Minnesota Power has an approved cost recovery rider in place for certain transmission investments and expenditures. In ana 2016 order, dated February 3, 2016, the MPUC approved Minnesota Power’s updated customer billing factor which allowsrates allowing Minnesota Power to charge retail customers on a current basis for the costs of constructing certain transmission facilities plus a return on the capital invested. AsOn July 9, 2019, Minnesota Power filed a result of thepetition seeking MPUC approval ofto update the certificate of needcustomer billing factor to include investments made for the GNTL in June 2015, the project is eligible for cost recovery under the existing transmission cost recovery rider. Minnesota Power is funding the construction of the GNTL with Manitoba Hydro (see Great Northern Transmission Line),GNTL. (See Note 9. Commitments, Guarantees and anticipates including its portion of the investments and expenditures for the GNTL in future transmission factor filings.Contingencies.)


Renewable Cost Recovery Rider. Minnesota Power has an approved cost recovery rider in place for certain renewable investments and expenditures relatedexpenditures. The cost recovery rider allows Minnesota Power to Bison andcharge retail customers on a current basis for the restoration and repaircosts of Thomson. Updatedcertain renewable investments plus a return on the capital invested. Current customer billing rates for the renewable cost recovery rider were approved by the MPUC in an order dated December 21, 2016, which allowsa November 2018 order. On August 15, 2019, Minnesota Power filed a petition seeking MPUC approval to charge retail customers on a current basis forupdate the costs of constructing certain renewable investments plus a return on the capital invested. The approval is on a provisional basis pending the outcome of Minnesota Power’s 2016 general rate case.customer billing factor.


In an order dated November 30, 2016, the MPUC directed Minnesota Power to attribute all North Dakota investment tax credits realized from Bison to Minnesota Power regulated retail customers. As a result of the adverse regulatory outcome, Minnesota Power has created a regulatory liability, and recorded a reduction in operating revenue for $15.0 million. The North Dakota investment tax credits previously recognized as income tax credits in Corporate and Other were reversed in 2016 resulting in an $8.8 million charge to net income. On December 20, 2016, Minnesota Power submitted a request for reconsideration with the MPUC. On February 9, 2017, the MPUC decided to reconsider its November 30, 2016 order and will be requesting further comments. Minnesota Power will provide further support on its position.

Prior to the November 30, 2016, MPUC order, Minnesota Power accounted for North Dakota investment tax credits based on the long-standing regulatory precedents of stand-alone allocation methodology of accounting for income taxes. The stand-alone method provides that income taxes (and credits) are calculated as if Minnesota Power was the only entity included in ALLETE’s consolidated federal and unitary state income tax returns. Minnesota Power had recorded a regulatory liability for North Dakota investment tax credits generated by its jurisdictional activity and expected to be realized in the future. North Dakota investment tax credits attributable to ALLETE’s apportionment and income of ALLETE’s other subsidiaries were included in the ALLETE consolidated group.

Minnesota Power also has approval for current cost recovery of investments and expenditures related to compliance with the Minnesota Solar Energy Standard. (See Minnesota Solar Energy Standard.) Currently, there is no approved customer billing rate for solar costs, but Minnesota Power expects to file its first solar factor filing in 2017 for recovery of costs related to the Camp Ripley solar project and community solar garden project.costs.




NOTE 4. REGULATORY MATTERS (Continued)
Electric Rates (Continued)


Environmental Improvement Rider. Minnesota Power has an approved environmental improvement rider in place for investments and expenditures related to the implementation of the Boswell Unit 4 mercury emissions reduction plan completed in 2015. Updated customer billing rates for the environmental improvement rider were approved by the MPUC in ana November 2018 order.

Fuel Adjustment Clause Reform. In a 2017 order, dated December 21, 2016; however, Minnesota Power plans to delay implementation of the updated rates until resolution of its 2016 general rate case. (See 2016 Minnesota General Rate Case.)

Boswell Remaining Life Petition. In November 2015, Minnesota Power filed a petition with the MPUC adopted a program to implement certain procedural reforms to Minnesota utilities’ automatic fuel adjustment clause (FAC) for approval to extend Boswell’s remaining life to 2050fuel and purchased power. With this order, the method of accounting for all unitsMinnesota electric utilities changed to a monthly budgeted, forward-looking FAC with annual prudence review and utilize the existing environmental improvement ridertrue-up to credit a portion of the depreciation expense savings to customers. The extension request was based on the significant multi-emissions retrofit work done at Boswell Unit 3 and Boswell Unit 4. For efficiency, Minnesota Power withdrew its petition to extend Boswell’s remaining life as Minnesota Power decided to incorporate the life extension in its 2016 general rate case. In an order dated September 23, 2016, the MPUC approved Minnesota Power’s request to withdraw the petition.actual allowed costs. On FebruaryMay 1, 2017,2019, Minnesota Power filed its 2017 remaining life depreciation petitionfuel adjustment forecast for 2020, which was accepted by the MPUC in which it requested extending Boswell’s remaining life to 2050.

Annual Automatic Adjustment (AAA) of Charges. In an order dated June 2, 2016, the MPUC approved Minnesota Power’s AAA filings made in 2012 and 2013. The MPUC deferred actionNovember 14, 2019, for 90 days on the AAA filing made in 2014 to review and confirm coal transportation costs and termspurposes of service, which was subsequently completed on September 6, 2016, resulting in final approval of the filing. Minnesota Power’s AAA filings made in 2015 and 2016 are pending MPUC approval, and represent approximately $350 million in retailsetting fuel cost recovery collected butadjustment clause rates for 2020, subject to refund. These filings have historically been approved, and Minnesota Power currently expects full recovery of amounts represented by the AAA filings, although we cannot predict the outcome of the filings at the MPUC.a true-up filing in 2021.


20162018 Wisconsin General Rate Case.SWL&P’s current retail rates are based onIn a 2012December 2018 order, the PSCW retail rate order that allows for a 10.9 percent return on common equity. On June 28, 2016, SWL&P filedapproved a rate increase request with the PSCW requesting an average overall increase of 3.1 percent for retail customers (a 3.5 percent increase in electric rates,SWL&P including a 1.3 percent decrease in natural gas rates and a 7.8 percent increase in water rates). The rate filing seeks an overall return on equity of 10.910.4 percent and a 5555.0 percent equity ratio. On an annualized basis, the requested rate increase would generate approximately $2.7 millionFinal rates went into effect January 1, 2019, which resulted in additional revenue. Hearings are expected to be scheduled in the first halfrevenue of 2017. The Company anticipates new rates will take effect during the second quarter of 2017. We cannot predict the level of rates that may be approved by the PSCW.approximately $3 million.


Integrated Resource Plan (IRP).Plan.In 2013, the MPUC approved Minnesota Power’s 2013 IRP which detailed its EnergyForward strategic plan. Significant elements of the EnergyForward plan include major wind investments in North Dakota completed in 2014, the installation of emissions control technology at Boswell Unit 4 completed in December 2015, planning for the proposed GNTL, the conversion of Laskin from coal to natural gas completed in June 2015 and the retirement of Taconite Harbor Unit 3 completed in May 2015. In September 2015, Minnesota Power filed its 2015 IRP with the MPUC which included an analysis of variety of existing and future energy resource alternatives and a projection of customer cost impact by class. The 2015 IRP also contained the next steps in Minnesota Power’s EnergyForward plan including the economic idling of Taconite Harbor Units 1 and 2 which occurred in September 2016 the ceasing of coal-fired operations at Taconite Harbor in 2020, and the addition of between 200 MW and 300 MW of natural gas-fired generation in the next decade.

In an order, dated July 18, 2016, the MPUC approved Minnesota Power’s 2015 IRP with modifications. The order acceptsaccepted Minnesota Power’s plans for the economic idling of Taconite Harbor directsUnits 1 and 2 and the ceasing of coal-fired operations at Taconite Harbor in 2020, directed Minnesota Power to retire Boswell Units 1 and 2 no later than 2022, requiresrequired an analysis of generation and demand response alternatives to be filed with a natural gas resource proposal, and requiresrequired Minnesota Power to conduct requestrequests for proposalsproposal for additional wind, solar and demand response resource additions subject to further MPUC approvals. On October 19, 2016,additions. Minnesota Power announcedretired Boswell Units 1 and 2 will be retired in 2018 as the latest step in its EnergyForward strategic plan.fourth quarter of 2018. Minnesota Power’s next IRP must be filed by Februaryfiling is due October 1, 2018.2020.



NOTE 4. REGULATORY MATTERS (Continued)

Great Northern Transmission Line.In 2017, Minnesota Power and Manitoba Hydro have proposedsubmitted a resource package to the MPUC which included requesting approval of a PPA for the output of a 250 MW wind energy facility as well as approval of a 250 MW natural gas capacity dedication agreement. The natural gas capacity dedication agreement was subject to MPUC approval of the construction of NTEC, a 525 MW to 625 MW combined-cycle natural gas‑fired generating facility which will be jointly owned by Dairyland Power Cooperative and a subsidiary of ALLETE. Minnesota Power would purchase approximately 50 percent of the GNTL,facility's output starting in 2025. In an approximately 220-mile 500-kV transmission line between Manitobaorder dated January 24, 2019, the MPUC approved Minnesota Power’s request for approval of the NTEC natural gas capacity dedication agreement. Separately, the MPUC required a baseload retirement evaluation in Minnesota Power’s next IRP filing analyzing its existing fleet, including potential early retirement scenarios of Boswell Units 3 and Minnesota’s Iron Range.4, as well as a securitization plan. On December 23, 2019, the Minnesota Court of Appeals reversed and remanded the MPUC’s decision to approve certain affiliated-interest agreements. The GNTLMPUC was ordered to determine whether NTEC may have the potential for significant environmental effects and, if so, to prepare an environmental assessment worksheet before reassessing the agreements. On January 22, 2020, Minnesota Power filed a petition for further review with the Minnesota Supreme Court requesting that it review and overturn the Minnesota Court of Appeals decision. On January 8, 2019, an application for a certificate of public convenience and necessity for NTEC was submitted to the PSCW, which was approved by the PSCW at a hearing on January 16, 2020. Construction of NTEC is subject to variousobtaining additional permits from local, state and federal and state regulatory approvals. authorities. The total project cost is estimated to be approximately $700 million, of which ALLETE’s portion is expected to be approximately $350 million. ALLETE’s portion of NTEC project costs incurred through December 31, 2019, is approximately $12 million.

In 2013,August 2018, Minnesota Power filed a certificateseparate petition for approval of need application was filed withan amended PPA for the MPUCoutput of the 250 MW wind energy facility to be located in southwestern Minnesota which was approved in a June 2015 order. Based on this order, Minnesota Power’s portion of the investments and expenditures for the project are eligible for cost recovery under its existing transmission cost recovery rider and are anticipated to be included in future transmission factor filings. In a December 2015 order, the FERC approved our request to recover on construction work in progress related to the GNTL from Minnesota Power’s wholesale customers. In 2014, Minnesota Power filed a route permit application with the MPUC and a request for a presidential permit to cross the U.S.-Canadian border with the U.S. Department of Energy. In an order dated April 11, 2016, the MPUC approved the route permit which largely follows Minnesota Power’s preferred route, including the international border crossing, and on November 16, 2016, the U.S. Department of Energy issued a presidential permit, which was the final major regulatory approval needed before construction in the U.S. can begin in early 2017.January 23, 2019. (See Note 5. Equity Investments.)


Manitoba Hydro must obtain regulatory and governmental approvals related to a new transmission line in Canada. In September 2015, Manitoba Hydro submitted the final preferred route and EIS for the transmission line in Canada to the Manitoba Conservation and Water Stewardship for regulatory approval. Construction of Manitoba Hydro’s hydroelectric generation facility commenced in 2014.

Conservation Improvement Program (CIP). Program. Minnesota requires electric utilities to spend a minimum of 1.5 percent of net gross operating revenues, excluding revenue received from exempt customers, from service provided in the state on energy CIPs each year. These investments are recovered from certain retail customers through a combination of the conservation cost recovery charge included in retail base rates and a conservation program adjustment, which is adjusted annually through the CIP consolidated filing. The MPUC allows utilities to accumulate, in a deferred account for future cost recovery, all CIP expenditures, any financial incentive earned for cost-effective program achievements, and a carrying charge on the deferred account balance. Minnesota Power refers to its conservation programs collectively as the “Power of One”. On November 3, 2016,In 2017, the Minnesota Department of Commerce approved Minnesota Power’s modified CIP triennial filing for 2017 through 2019, which outlinesoutlined Minnesota Power’s CIP spending and energy-saving goals for 2017 through 2019.those years. Minnesota Power’s CIP investment goal was $7.3$10.5 million for 20162019 ($7.110.3 million for 2015; $6.9 million for 2014)2018 and 2017), with actual spending of $7.4$8.3 million in 20162019 ($6.69.0 million in 2015; $7.22018; $8.1 million in 2014)2017). The investment goalsgoal for 2017, 2018 and 2019 are $10.62020 is $10.5 million $10.8 million and $10.9 million, respectively.based on approval of an extension for Minnesota Power’s next CIP triennial filing by the Minnesota Department of Commerce on November 26, 2019.


Minnesota requires each utility to establish an annual energy-savings goal of 1.5 percent of annual retail energy sales.
NOTE 4. REGULATORY MATTERS (Continued)
Conservation Improvement Program (Continued)

On April 1, 2016,2019, Minnesota Power submitted its 2015 CIP2018 consolidated filing, which detailed Minnesota Power’s CIP program results and requested a CIP financial incentive of $7.5$2.8 million based upon MPUC procedures. Inprocedures, which was approved by the MPUC in an order dated July 19, 2016,2019. In 2018, the MPUC approved Minnesota Power’s CIP consolidated filing, including the requested CIP financial incentive whichof $3.0 million was recorded as revenue and as a regulatory asset. The approved financial incentive will be recovered through customer billing ratesrecognized in 2016 and 2017. In 2015 and 2014, the third quarter upon approval by the MPUC of Minnesota Power’s 2017 CIP financial incentives recognized were $6.2 million and $8.7 million, respectively.consolidated filing. CIP financial incentives are recognized in the period in which the MPUC approves the filing.


MISO Return on Equity Complaints. In 2013, several customer groups located within the MISO service area filed complaints with the FERC requesting, among other things, a reduction in the base return on equity used by Complaint. MISO transmission owners, including ALLETE and ATC, to 9.15 percent. In December 2015, a federal administrative law judge ruled on the complaint proposing a reduction in the basehave an authorized return on equity to 10.32of 9.88 percent, or 10.82 percent including an incentive adder for participation in a regional transmission organization. On September 28, 2016, the FERC issued an order affirming the administrative law judge’s recommendation.

In February 2015, an additional complaint was filed with the FERC seeking an order to further reduce the base return on equity to 8.67 percent. On June 30, 2016, a federal administrative law judge ruled on the February 2015, complaint proposing a further reduction in the base return on equity to 9.70 percent, or 10.2010.38 percent including an incentive adder for participation in a regional transmission organization, subject to approval or adjustment by the FERC. A final decision frombased on a November 2019 FERC order. In this order, the FERC onreduced the administrative law judge’s recommendation is expected in 2017. The final decision from the FERC is not expected to have a material impact on ALLETE’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

In January 2015, the FERC approved an incentive adder of up to 50 basis points on the allowed base return on equity for our participation in a regional transmission organization uponorganizations as recommended by an administrative law judge with refunds ordered for prior periods, which are immaterial to ALLETE. Multiple parties to the resolution of each individual return on equity complaint.complaint have appealed the FERC order.



NOTE 4. REGULATORY MATTERS (Continued)

Minnesota Solar Energy Standard. In 2013, legislation was enacted by the state of Minnesota requiringlaw requires at least 1.5 percent of total retail electric sales, excluding sales to certain customers, to be generated by solar energy by the end of 2020. At least 10 percent of the 1.5 percent mandate must be met by solar energy generated by or procured from solar photovoltaic devices with a nameplate capacity of 2040 kW or less. less and community solar garden subscriptions.

Minnesota Power has one completedPower’s solar project and another under development. In August 2015, Minnesota Power filed for MPUC approvalenergy supply consists of Camp Ripley, a 10 MW utility scale solar projectenergy facility at the Camp Ripley Minnesota Army National Guard base and training facility near Little Falls, Minnesota. In an order dated February 24, 2016, the MPUC approved the Camp Ripley solar project as eligible to meet the solar energy standardMinnesota, and for current cost recovery, which was subsequently finalized by the MPUC in an order dated December 12, 2016. The Camp Ripley solar project was completed in the fourth quarter of 2016. In September 2015, Minnesota Power filed for MPUC approval of a community solar garden project in northeastern Minnesota, which is comprised of a 1 MW solar array to be owned and operated by a third party with the output purchased by Minnesota Power and a 40 kW solar array that will beis owned and operated by Minnesota Power. In an order dated July 27, 2016, the MPUC approvedMinnesota Power expects that Camp Ripley, the community solar garden projectarrays, and cost recovery, subject to certain compliance requirements.an increase in solar rebates will allow Minnesota Power believes these projects willto meet approximately one-thirdboth parts of the overallsolar mandate. Additionally, on January 19, 2017, the MPUC approved Minnesota Power’s proposal to increase the amount of solar rebates available for customer-sited solar installations and recover costs of the program through Minnesota Power’s renewable cost recovery rider. This proposal to incentivize customer-sited solar installations is expected to meet a portion of the required mandate related to solar photovoltaic devices with a nameplate capacity of 20 kW or less.


Regulatory Assets and Liabilities. Our regulated utility operations are subject to accounting guidance for the effect of certain types of regulation. Regulatory assets represent incurred costs that have been deferred as they are probable for recovery in customer rates. Regulatory liabilities represent obligations to make refunds to customers and amounts collected in rates for which the related costs have not yet been incurred. The Company assesses quarterly whether regulatory assets and liabilities meet the criteria for probability of future recovery or deferral. NoWith the exception of the regulatory asset for Boswell Units 1 and 2 net plant and equipment, no other regulatory assets or liabilities are currently earning a return. The recovery, refund or credit to rates for these regulatory assets and liabilities will occur over the periods either specified by the applicable regulatory authority or over the corresponding period related to the asset or liability.



NOTE 4. REGULATORY MATTERS (Continued)
Regulatory Assets and Liabilities  
As of December 312019
2018
Millions  
Non-Current Regulatory Assets  
Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans (a)

$212.9

$218.5
Income Taxes (b)
123.4
105.5
Asset Retirement Obligations (c)
32.0
32.6
Cost Recovery Riders (d)
24.7

Boswell 1 & 2 Net Plant and Equipment (e)
10.7
16.3
Manufactured Gas Plant (f)
8.2
8.0
PPACA Income Tax Deferral4.8
5.0
Other3.8
3.6
Total Non-Current Regulatory Assets
$420.5

$389.5
Current Regulatory Liabilities (g)
  
Provision for Interim Rate Refund (h)


$40.0
Provision for Tax Reform Refund (i)

$0.2
10.7
Transmission Formula Rates1.7
4.4
Total Current Regulatory Liabilities1.9
55.1
Non-Current Regulatory Liabilities  
Income Taxes (b)
407.2
396.4
Wholesale and Retail Contra AFUDC (j)
79.3
64.4
Plant Removal Obligations (k)
35.5
25.1
Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans (a)
17.0

North Dakota Investment Tax Credits (l)
12.3
14.7
Conservation Improvement Program (m)
5.4
1.5
Cost Recovery Riders (d)

6.9
Transmission Formula Rates
1.6
Other3.6
1.5
Total Non-Current Regulatory Liabilities560.3
512.1
Total Regulatory Liabilities
$562.2

$567.2
Regulatory Assets and Liabilities  
As of December 312016
2015
Millions  
Current Regulatory Assets (a)
  
Deferred Fuel Adjustment Clause
$18.6

$10.6
   Total Current Regulatory Assets18.6
10.6
Non-Current Regulatory Assets  
Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans (b)
226.1
219.3
Income Taxes (c)
63.3
64.2
Cost Recovery Riders (d)
30.5
58.0
Asset Retirement Obligations (e)
26.0
21.6
PPACA Income Tax Deferral5.0
5.0
Other8.7
3.9
Total Non-Current Regulatory Assets359.6
372.0
Total Regulatory Assets
$378.2

$382.6
   
Non-Current Regulatory Liabilities  
Wholesale and Retail Contra AFUDC (f)

$56.8

$58.0
North Dakota Investment Tax Credits (g)
28.2
12.8
Income Taxes (c)
19.1
6.1
Plant Removal Obligations19.1
22.1
Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans (b)

0.9
Other2.6
5.1
Total Non-Current Regulatory Liabilities
$125.8

$105.0

(a)Current regulatory assets are presented within Prepayments and Other on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
(b)Defined benefit pension and other postretirement items included in our Regulated Operations, which are otherwise required to be recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income as actuarial gains and losses as well as prior service costs and credits, are recognized as regulatory assets or regulatory liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The asset or liability will decrease as the deferred items are amortized and recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost. (See Note 15.12. Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans.)
(c)(b)These costs represent the difference between deferred income taxes recognized for financial reporting purposes and amounts previously billed to our customers. This balanceThe balances will primarily decrease over the remaining life of the related temporary differences and flow through current income taxes.differences.
(d)The cost recovery rider regulatory assets are revenues not yet collected from our customers primarily due to capital expenditures related to Bison, investment in CapX2020 projects, and the Boswell Unit 4 environmental upgrade and are recognized in accordance with the accounting standards for alternative revenue programs. The cost recovery rider regulatory assets as of December 31, 2016, will be recovered within the next two years.
(e)(c)Asset retirement obligations will accrete and be amortized over the lives of the related property with asset retirement obligations.
(d)The cost recovery rider regulatory assets and liabilities are revenue not yet collected from our customers and cash collections from our customers in excess of the revenue recognized, respectively, primarily due to capital expenditures related to Bison, investment in CapX2020 projects, the Boswell Unit 4 environmental upgrade and the GNTL. The cost recovery rider regulatory assets as of December 31, 2019, will be recovered within the next two years.
(e)In December 2018, Minnesota Power retired Boswell Units 1 and 2 and reclassified the remaining net book value from property, plant and equipment to a regulatory asset on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The remaining net book value is currently included in Minnesota Power’s rate base and Minnesota Power is earning a return on the outstanding balance.
(f)The manufactured gas plant regulatory asset represents costs of remediation for a former manufactured gas plant site located in Superior, Wisconsin, and formerly operated by SWL&P. We expect recovery of these remediation costs to be allowed by the PSCW in rates over time.
(g)Current regulatory liabilities are presented within Other Current Liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
(h)This amount was refunded to Minnesota Power’s regulated retail customers in the second quarter of 2019.
(i)Provision for Tax Reform Refund related to the income tax benefits of the TCJA in 2018 was refunded to Minnesota Power customers in the first quarter of 2019 and is being returned to SWL&P customers through 2020.
(j)Wholesale and Retail Contraretail contra AFUDC represents amortization to offset AFUDC Equity and Debt recorded during the construction period of our cost recovery rider projects prior to placing the projects in service. The regulatory liability will decrease over the remaining depreciable life of the related asset.
(g)(k)Non-legal plant removal obligations included in retail customer rates that have not yet been incurred.
(l)North Dakota investment tax credits expected to be realized from Bison that will be credited to Minnesota Power’s regulated retail customers over the remaining life of Bison through future renewable cost recovery rider fillings.filings as the tax credits are utilized.
(m)The conservation improvement program regulatory liability represents CIP expenditures, any financial incentive earned for cost-effective program achievements and a carrying charge deferred for future refund over the next year following MPUC approval.





NOTE 5. INVESTMENT IN ATCEQUITY INVESTMENTS


Investment in ATC. Our wholly-owned subsidiary, ALLETE Transmission Holdings, owns approximately 8 percent of ATC, a Wisconsin-based utility that owns and maintains electric transmission assets in partsportions of Wisconsin, Michigan, Minnesota and Illinois. We account for our investment in ATC under the equity method of accounting. As of For the year ended December 31, 2016, our equity investment2019, we invested $6.6 million in ATC was $135.6 million ($124.5 million at Decemberand on January 31, 2015). On January 27, 2017,2020, we invested an additional $3.1$0.4 million in ATC. In total, we expect to invest approximately $10.9$2.7 million throughout 2017.in 2020.
ALLETE’s Investment in ATC  
Year Ended December 312019
2018
Millions  
Equity Investment Beginning Balance
$128.1

$118.7
Cash Investments6.6
6.2
Equity in ATC Earnings21.7
17.5
Distributed ATC Earnings(16.1)(15.2)
Amortization of the Remeasurement of Deferred Income Taxes1.3
0.9
Equity Investment Ending Balance
$141.6

$128.1
ALLETE’s Investment in ATC  
Year Ended December 312016
2015
Millions  
Equity Investment Beginning Balance
$124.5

$121.1
Cash Investments5.4
1.6
Equity in ATC Earnings18.5
16.3
Distributed ATC Earnings(12.8)(14.5)
Equity Investment Ending Balance
$135.6

$124.5

ATC Summarized Financial Data  
Balance Sheet Data  
As of December 312019
2018
Millions  
Current Assets
$84.6

$87.2
Non-Current Assets5,244.3
4,928.8
Total Assets
$5,328.9

$5,016.0
Current Liabilities
$502.6

$640.0
Long-Term Debt2,312.8
2,014.0
Other Non-Current Liabilities298.9
295.3
Members’ Equity2,214.6
2,066.7
Total Liabilities and Members’ Equity
$5,328.9

$5,016.0
ATC Summarized Financial Data  
Balance Sheet Data  
As of December 312016
2015
Millions  
Current Assets
$75.8

$80.5
Non-Current Assets4,312.9
3,957.6
Total Assets
$4,388.7

$4,038.1
Current Liabilities
$495.1

$330.3
Long-Term Debt1,865.3
1,800.0
Other Non-Current Liabilities271.5
245.0
Members’ Equity1,756.8
1,662.8
Total Liabilities and Members’ Equity
$4,388.7

$4,038.1

Income Statement Data   
Year Ended December 312019
2018
2017
Millions   
Revenue
$744.4

$690.5

$721.6
Operating Expense373.5
358.7
344.9
Other Expense110.5
108.3
104.1
Net Income
$260.4

$223.5

$272.6
ALLETE’s Equity in Net Income
$21.7

$17.5

$22.5

Income Statement Data   
Year Ended December 312016
2015
2014
Millions   
Revenue
$650.8

$615.8

$635.0
Operating Expense322.5
319.3
307.4
Other Expense95.5
96.1
88.9
Net Income
$232.8

$200.4

$238.7
ALLETE’s Equity in Net Income
$18.5

$16.3

$19.6


On September 28, 2016, the FERC issued an order reducing ATC’s authorized return on equity to 10.32is 9.88 percent, or 10.82 percent including an incentive adder for participation in a regional transmission organization. Prior to this order, ATC had been allowed a return on equity of 12.2 percent which had been impacted by reductions for estimated refunds related to complaints filed with the FERC by several customers located within the MISO service area.

On June 30, 2016, a federal administrative law judge ruled on an additional complaint proposing a further reduction in the base return on equity to 9.70 percent, or 10.2010.38 percent including an incentive adder for participation in a regional transmission organization, subject to approval or adjustment by the FERC. A final decision from thebased on a November 2019 FERC on the administrative law judge’s recommendation is expected in 2017.order. (See Note 4. Regulatory Matters.) We own approximately 8 percent of ATC and estimate that for every 50 basis point reduction in ATC’s allowed return on equity our equity earnings in ATC would be impacted annually by approximately $0.5 million after-tax.





NOTE 6. ACQUISITIONS5. EQUITY INVESTMENTS (Continued)


The following acquisitions are consistentInvestment in Nobles 2. In December 2018, our wholly-owned subsidiary, ALLETE South Wind, entered into an agreement with ALLETE’s stated strategy of investing in energy infrastructure and related services businessesTenaska to complement its regulated businesses, balance exposure to business cycles and changing demand, and provide potential long-term earnings growth. The pro forma impact of the following acquisitions was not significant, either individually or in the aggregate, to the results of the Company for the years ended December 31, 2016, and 2015.

2016 Activity.

Acquisition of Non-Controlling Interest. On April 15, 2016, ALLETE Clean Energy acquired the non-controllingpurchase a 49 percent equity interest in Nobles 2, the limited liability companyentity that owns its Condon wind energy facility for $8.0 million. This transaction was accounted for as an equity transaction,will own and no gain or loss was recognized in net income or other comprehensive income. Asoperate a result of the acquisition, the Condon wind energy facility is now a wholly-owned subsidiary of ALLETE Clean Energy.

WEST. On October 11, 2016, U.S. Water Services acquired 100 percent of Water & Energy Systems Technology of Nevada, Inc. (WEST). Total consideration for the transaction was $6.5 million, subject to a cash and working capital adjustment. Consideration of $5.9 million was paid in cash on the acquisition date and a $0.6 million payment is due in April 2018. WEST, similar to U.S. Water Services, is an integrated water management company and was acquired to expand U.S. Water Services’ regional footprint in the Southwestern United States.

The acquisition was accounted for as a business combination and the purchase price was allocated based on the preliminary estimated fair values of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition, as shown in the table below. The allocation of the purchase price is subject to judgment and the preliminary estimated fair value of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed may be adjusted when the valuation analysis is complete in subsequent periods. Preliminary estimates subject to adjustment in subsequent periods relate primarily to working capital; subsequent adjustments could impact the amount of goodwill recorded. Fair value measurements were valued primarily using the discounted cash flow method and replacement cost basis.
Millions
Assets Acquired
Cash and Cash Equivalents
$0.1
Other Current Assets1.1
Customer Relationships (a)
2.8
Goodwill (b)
3.9
Other Non-Current Assets0.1
Total Assets Acquired
$8.0
Liabilities Assumed
Current Liabilities
$0.2
Non-Current Liabilities1.2
Total Liabilities Assumed
$1.4
Net Identifiable Assets Acquired
$6.6
(a)Presented within Goodwill and Intangible Assets – Net on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. (See Note 7. Goodwill and Intangible Assets.)
(b)For tax purposes, the purchase price allocation resulted in no allocation to goodwill.

Acquisition-related costs were immaterial, expensed as incurred during 2016 and recorded in Operating and Maintenance on the Consolidated Statement of Income.

2015 Activity.

U.S. Water Services. In February 2015, ALLETE acquired U.S. Water Services. Total consideration for the transaction was $202.3 million, which included payment of $166.6 million in cash and an estimated fair value of earnings-based contingent consideration of $35.7 million, as estimated at the date of acquisition, to be paid through 2019. The contingent consideration is presented within Other Non-Current Liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The Consolidated Statement of Income reflects 100 percent of the results of operations for U.S. Water Services since the acquisition date as the Company has acquired 100 percent of U.S. Water Services.


NOTE 6.  ACQUISITIONS (Continued)
2015 Activity (Continued)

The acquisition was accounted for as a business combination and the purchase price was allocated based on the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition. The purchase price accounting, which was finalized in 2015, is reflected in the following table. Fair value measurements were valued primarily using the discounted cash flow method.
Millions
Assets Acquired
Cash and Cash Equivalents
$0.9
Accounts Receivable16.8
Inventories (a)
13.4
Other Current Assets (b)
5.3
Property, Plant and Equipment10.6
Intangible Assets (c)
83.0
Goodwill (d)
122.9
Other Non-Current Assets0.2
Total Assets Acquired
$253.1
Liabilities Assumed
Current Liabilities
$19.2
Non-Current Liabilities31.6
Total Liabilities Assumed
$50.8
Net Identifiable Assets Acquired
$202.3
(a)Included in Inventories was $2.7 million of fair value adjustments relating to work in progress and finished goods inventories which were recognized as Cost of Sales within one year from the acquisition date.
(b)Included in Other Current Assets was $1.6 million relating to the fair value of sales backlog. Sales backlog was recognized as Cost of Sales within one year from the acquisition date. Also included in Other Current Assets was restricted cash of $2.1 million relating to cash pledged as collateral for standby letters of credit.
(c)Intangible Assets include customer relationships, patents, non-compete agreements, and trademarks and trade names. (See Note 7. Goodwill and Intangible Assets.)
(d)For tax purposes, the purchase price allocation resulted in $2.9 million of deductible goodwill.

Acquisition-related costs of $3.0 million after-tax were expensed as incurred during 2015 and recorded in Operating and Maintenance on the Consolidated Statement of Income.

Chanarambie/Viking. In April 2015, ALLETE Clean Energy acquired 100 percent of wind energy facilities in southern Minnesota (Chanarambie/Viking) from EDF Renewable Energy, Inc. for $48.0 million.

The facilities have 97.5250 MW of generating capability and are located near ALLETE Clean Energy’s Lake Benton facility. The wind energy facilities began commercial operations in 2003 and have PSAs in place for their entire output, which expire in 2018 (12 MW) and 2023 (85.5 MW).

The acquisition was accounted for as a business combination and the purchase price was allocated based on the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition. The purchase price accounting, which was finalized in 2015, is reflected in the following table. Fair value measurements were valued primarily using the discounted cash flow method.


NOTE 6.  ACQUISITIONS (Continued)
2015 Activity (Continued)
Millions
Assets Acquired
Current Assets
$4.8
Property, Plant and Equipment103.0
Other Non-Current Assets (a)
1.0
Total Assets Acquired
$108.8
Liabilities Assumed
Current Liabilities (b)

$6.7
Power Sales Agreements49.0
Non-Current Liabilities5.1
Total Liabilities Assumed
$60.8
Net Identifiable Assets Acquired
$48.0
(a)Included in Other Non-Current Assets was $0.3 million of goodwill. For tax purposes, the purchase price allocation resulted in no allocation to goodwill.
(b)Current Liabilities included $5.9 million related to the current portion of PSAs.

Acquisition-related costs of $0.2 million after-tax were expensed as incurred during 2015 and recorded in Operating and Maintenance on the Consolidated Statement of Income.

Armenia Mountain. In July 2015, ALLETE Clean Energy acquired 100 percent of a wind energy facility located near Troy, Pennsylvania (Armenia Mountain) from The AES Corporation and a minority shareholder for $111.1 million, plus the assumption of existing debt.

The facility has 100.5 MW of generating capability, began commercial operations in 2009, and has PSAs in place for its entire output, which expire in 2024.

The acquisition was accounted for as a business combination and the purchase price was allocated based on the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition. The purchase price accounting, which was finalized in 2015, is reflected in the following table. Fair value measurements were valued primarily using the discounted cash flow method.
Millions
Assets Acquired
Current Assets (a)
$9.0
Property, Plant and Equipment156.2
Other Non-Current Assets (b)
14.4
Total Assets Acquired
$179.6
Liabilities Assumed
Current Liabilities
$2.9
Long-Term Debt Due Within One Year5.9
Long-Term Debt55.0
Other Non-Current Liabilities4.7
Total Liabilities Assumed$68.5
Net Identifiable Assets Acquired
$111.1
(a)Included in Current Assets was $1.0 million related to the current portion of PSAs and $6.0 million of restricted cash related to collateral deposits required under its loan agreement.
(b)Included in Other Non-Current Assets was $8.2 million related to the non-current portion of PSAs, $6.1 million of restricted cash related to collateral deposits required under its loan agreements and an immaterial amount of goodwill. For tax purposes, the purchase price allocation resulted in no allocation to goodwill.


NOTE 6.  ACQUISITIONS (Continued)
2015 Activity (Continued)

Acquisition-related costs of $1.6 million after-tax were expensed as incurred during 2015 and recorded in Operating and Maintenance on the Consolidated Statement of Income.

A and W Technologies. In November 2015, U.S. Water Services acquired 100 percent of A and W Technologies, Inc. (AWT). Total consideration for the transaction was $9.3 million, which included payment of $8.3 million in cash and a $1.0 million payment due in April 2017. AWT, similar to U.S. Water Services, is an integrated water management company and was acquired to expand U.S. Water Services’ regional footprint in the Southeastern United States.

The acquisition was accounted for as a business combination and the purchase price was allocated based on the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition. The purchase price accounting, which was finalized in 2015, is reflected in the following table. Fair value measurements were valued primarily using the discounted cash flow method.
Millions
Assets Acquired
Current Assets$1.0
Property, Plant and Equipment0.1
Intangible Assets (a)
3.9
Goodwill (b)
4.4
Total Assets Acquired
$9.4
Liabilities Assumed
Current Liabilities
$0.1
Total Liabilities Assumed$0.1
Net Identifiable Assets Acquired
$9.3
(a)Intangible Assets include customer relationships and non-compete agreements. (See Note 7. Goodwill and Intangible Assets.)
(b)For tax purposes, the purchase price allocation resulted in $4.4 million of deductible goodwill.

Acquisition-related costs were immaterial, expensed as incurred during 2015 and recorded in Operating and Maintenance on the Consolidated Statement of Income.

2014 Activity.

ACE Wind Acquisition. In 2014, ALLETE Clean Energy acquired wind energy facilities located in Lake Benton, Minnesota (Lake Benton), Storm Lake, Iowa (Storm Lake II) and Condon, Oregon (Condon) from AES for $26.9 million.

Lake Benton, Storm Lake II and Condon have 104 MW, 77 MW and 50 MW of generating capability, respectively. Lake Benton and Storm Lake II began commercial operations in 1998, while Condon began operations in 2002. All three wind energy facilities have PPAs in place for their entire output, which expire in various years between 2019 and 2032.

ALLETE Clean Energy acquired a controlling interest in the limited liability company (LLC) which owns Lake Benton and Storm Lake II, and a controlling interest in the LLC that owns Condon. The acquisition was accounted for as a business combination and the purchase price was allocated based on the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition. Fair value measurements were valued primarily using the discounted cash flow method.


NOTE 6.  ACQUISITIONS (Continued)
2014 Activity (Continued)
Millions
Assets Acquired
Cash and Cash Equivalents
$3.8
Other Current Assets14.3
Property, Plant and Equipment156.9
Other Non-Current Assets (a)
7.5
Total Assets Acquired
$182.5
Liabilities Assumed
Current Liabilities (b)

$15.2
Long-Term Debt Due Within One Year2.2
Long-Term Debt21.1
Power Sales Agreements99.4
Other Non-Current Liabilities10.6
Non-Controlling Interest (c)
7.1
Total Liabilities and Non-Controlling Interest Assumed$155.6
Net Identifiable Assets Acquired
$26.9
(a)Included in Other Non-Current Assets was $0.3 million for the option to purchase Armenia Mountain, and goodwill of $2.9 million. For tax purposes, the purchase price allocation resulted in no allocation to goodwill.
(b)Current Liabilities included $12.4 million related to the current portion of PSAs.
(c)The purchase price accounting valued the non-controlling interest related to Lake Benton, Storm Lake II and Condon at fair value using the discounted cash flow method.

Acquisition-related costs of $1.4 million after-tax were expensed as incurred during 2014 and recorded in Operating and Maintenance on the Consolidated Statement of Income.

In 2014, ALLETE Clean Energy purchased the non-controlling interest related to Lake Benton and Storm Lake II for $6.0 million. This was accounted for as an equity transaction, and no gain or loss was recognized in net income or other comprehensive income.

Storm Lake I Acquisition. In 2014, ALLETE Clean Energy acquired a wind energy facility in Storm Lake, Iowa (Storm Lake I) from NRG Energy, Inc. for $15.1 million.

Storm Lake I has 108 MW of generating capability and is located adjacentsouthwestern Minnesota pursuant to Storm Lake II.a 20-year PPA with Minnesota Power. The wind energy facility began commercial operationswill be built in 1999Nobles County, Minnesota and hasis expected to be completed in late 2020, with an estimated total project cost of approximately $350 million to $400 million. In the fourth quarter of 2019, we entered into a PPAtax equity funding agreement to finance up to $125 million of the project costs. We account for our investment in place for its entire output which expiresNobles 2 under the equity method of accounting. As of December 31, 2019, our equity investment in 2019.

The acquisitionNobles 2 was accounted for as a business combination and$56.0 million ($33.0 million at December 31, 2018). In the purchase price was allocatedfirst quarter of 2019, Nobles 2 returned capital of $8.3 million based on its cash needs. For the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition. The purchase price accounting, which was finalizedyear ended December 31, 2019, we invested $31.3 million in 2015, is reflectedNobles 2. We expect to invest approximately $115 million in the following table. Fair value measurements were valued primarily using the discounted cash flow method.2020.



NOTE 6.  ACQUISITIONS (Continued)
2014 Activity (Continued)
Millions
Assets Acquired
Cash and Cash Equivalents
$0.4
Other Current Assets4.7
Property, Plant and Equipment47.3
Other Non-Current Assets (a)
11.4
Total Assets Acquired
$63.8
Liabilities Assumed
Current Liabilities (b)

$8.2
Power Sales Agreements23.5
Non-Current Liabilities17.0
Total Liabilities Assumed$48.7
Net Identifiable Assets Acquired
$15.1
(a)Included in Other Non-Current Assets was $0.4 million of restricted cash and an immaterial amount of goodwill. For tax purposes, the purchase price allocation resulted in no allocation to goodwill.
(b)Current Liabilities included $7.5 million related to the current portion of PSAs.

Acquisition-related costs were immaterial, expensed as incurred during 2014 and recorded in Operating and Maintenance on the Consolidated Statement of Income.



NOTE 7.6.  GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS


As a result of completing the sale of U.S. Water Services on March 26, 2019, there was 0 goodwill recorded as of December 31, 2019 ($148.5 million at December 31, 2018).

The following table summarizes changes to goodwill by reportable segment:
 ALLETE Clean Energy
 U.S. Water Services
 Total
Millions     
Balance as of December 31, 2014
$2.9
 
 
$2.9
Acquired Goodwill (a)
0.4
 
$127.3
 127.7
Balance as of December 31, 20153.3
 127.3
 130.6
Acquired Goodwill (a)

 3.9
 3.9
Impairment Charge (b)
(3.3) 
 (3.3)
Balance as of December 31, 2016
 
$131.2
 
$131.2
(a)See Note 6. Acquisitions.
(b)The facts and circumstances that led to an impairmentbalance of ALLETE Clean Energy’s goodwill primarily relate to lower estimated energy prices in periods not under PSAs. Impairment Charge is included in Operating Expenses – Other on the Consolidated Statement of Income. (See Note 1. Operations and Significant Accounting Policies.) ALLETE Clean Energy’s goodwill was primarily related to the acquisition of Storm Lake II in January 2014.



NOTE 7.  GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS (Continued)

The following table summarizes changes to intangible assets, net, for the year ended December 31, 2016:2019:
December 31,
2015

 
Additions (a)
  Amortization December 31,
2016

December 31,
2018

  Amortization 
Other (b)
 December 31,
2019

Millions        
Intangible Assets        
Definite-Lived Intangible Assets        
Customer Relationships
$60.8
 
$2.8
 $(4.3) 
$59.3

$50.7
 $(1.1) $(49.6) 
Developed Technology and Other (b)(a)
7.2
 
 (0.9) 6.3
7.5
 (0.4) (6.1) 
$1.0
Total Definite-Lived Intangible Assets68.0
 2.8
 (5.2) 65.6
58.2
 (1.5) (55.7) 1.0
Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets        
Trademarks and Trade Names16.6
 
 n/a 16.6
16.6
 n/a (16.6) 
Total Intangible Assets
$84.6
 
$2.8
 $(5.2) 
$82.2

$74.8
 $(1.5) $(72.3) 
$1.0
(a)Additions resulting from the October 11, 2016, acquisition of WEST. (See Note 6. Acquisitions.)
(b)Developed Technology and Other includes patents, non-compete agreementsland easements and land easements.trade names with finite lives.

Customer relationships have a remaining useful life(b) On March 26, 2019, ALLETE completed the sale of approximately 21 years, and developed technology and other have remaining useful lives ranging from approximately 2 years to approximately 12 years (weighted averageU.S. Water Services which resulted in the removal of approximately 8 years). The weighted average remaining useful life of all definite-livedthe related intangible assets as of December 31, 2016, is approximately 20 years.from the Consolidated Balance Sheet.


Amortization expense offor intangible assets was $1.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, was $5.22019 ($5.6 million ($4.0 million in 2015; $0.1 million in 2014). Accumulated amortization was $9.3 million and $4.1 million as offor the year ended December 31, 2016, and December 31, 2015, respectively. Estimated amortization expense for2018). The remaining definite-lived intangible assets is $5.5 million in 2017, $5.1 million in 2018, $4.8 million in 2019, $4.5 million in 2020, $4.4 million in 2021 and $41.3 million thereafter.will continue to be amortized ratably through 2028.




NOTE 8. INVESTMENTS

Investments. As of December 31, 2016, the investment portfolio included the legacy real estate assets of ALLETE Properties, debt and equity securities consisting primarily of securities held in other postretirement plans to fund employee benefits, the cash equivalents within these plans and other assets consisting primarily of land in Minnesota.
Other Investments  
As of December 312016
2015
Millions  
ALLETE Properties (a)

$31.7

$50.1
Available-for-sale Securities (b)
18.8
18.5
Cash Equivalents1.3
2.0
Other3.8
4.0
Total Other Investments
$55.6

$74.6
(a)On September 22, 2016, ALLETE Properties sold its Ormond Crossings project and Lake Swamp wetland mitigation bank for consideration of approximately $21 million. The consideration included a down payment in the form of 0.1 million shares of ALLETE common stock with a value of $8.0 million, with the remaining purchase price to be paid under the terms of a finance receivable due over a five-year period which bears interest at market rates. The finance receivable is collateralized by the property sold.
(b)As of December 31, 2016, the aggregate amount of available-for-sale corporate and governmental debt securities maturing in one year or less was $0.2 million, in one year to less than three years was $3.2 million, in three years to less than five years was $5.0 million, and in five or more years was $3.3 million.

Land Inventory. Land inventory is accounted for as held for use and is recorded at cost, unless the carrying value is determined not to be recoverable in accordance with the accounting standards for property, plant and equipment, in which case the land inventory is written down to estimated fair value. Land values are reviewed for indicators of impairment on a quarterly basis and no impairment was recorded in 2016 ($36.3 million in 2015; none in 2014). (See Note 1. Operations and Significant Accounting Policies.)


NOTE 8. INVESTMENTS (Continued)

Available-for-Sale Investments.We account for our available-for-sale portfolio in accordance with the guidance for certain investments in debt and equity securities. Our available-for-sale securities portfolio consisted primarily of securities held in other postretirement plans to fund employee benefits.

Gross realized and unrealized gains and losses on our available-for-sale investments were immaterial in 2016, 2015 and 2014.


NOTE 9.7. FAIR VALUE


Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (exit price). We utilize market data or assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and the risks inherent in the inputs to the valuation technique. These inputs can be readily observable, market corroborated, or generally unobservable. We primarily apply the market approach for recurring fair value measurements and endeavor to utilize the best available information. Accordingly, we utilize valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. These inputs, which are used to measure fair value, are prioritized through the fair value hierarchy. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurement) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurement). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:


Level 1 — Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reported date. Active markets are those in which transactions for the asset or liability occur in sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis. This category includes primarily equity securities.


NOTE 7. FAIR VALUE (Continued)

Level 2 — Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets, but are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reported date. The types of assets and liabilities included in Level 2 are typically either comparable to actively traded securities or contracts, such as treasury securities with pricing interpolated from recent trades of similar securities, or priced with models using highly observable inputs, such as commodity options priced using observable forward prices and volatilities. This category includes deferred compensation and fixed income securities.


Level 3 — Significant inputs that are generally less observable from objective sources. The types of assets and liabilities included in Level 3 are those with inputs requiring significant management judgment or estimation, such as the complex and subjective models and forecasts used to determine the fair value. This category includesincluded the U.S. Water Services contingent consideration liability.


The following tables set forth by level within the fair value hierarchy, our assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 20162019, and December 31, 2015.2018. Each asset and liability is classified based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment, which may affect the valuation of these assets and liabilities and their placement within the fair value hierarchy levels. The estimated fair value of Cash and Cash Equivalents listed on the Consolidated Balance Sheet approximates the carrying amount and therefore is excluded from the recurring fair value measures in the following tables.


NOTE 9. FAIR VALUE (Continued)
 Fair Value as of December 31, 2019
Recurring Fair Value MeasuresLevel 1
 Level 2
 Level 3
 Total
Millions       
Assets:       
Investments (a)
       
Available-for-sale – Equity Securities
$11.1
 
 
 
$11.1
Available-for-sale – Corporate and Governmental Debt Securities (b)

 
$9.7
 
 9.7
Cash Equivalents0.9
 
 
 0.9
Total Fair Value of Assets
$12.0
 
$9.7
 
 
$21.7
        
Liabilities:       
Deferred Compensation (c)

 
$21.2
 
 
$21.2
Total Fair Value of Liabilities
 
$21.2
 
 
$21.2
Total Net Fair Value of Assets (Liabilities)
$12.0
 $(11.5) 
 $0.5
 Fair Value as of December 31, 2016
Recurring Fair Value MeasuresLevel 1
 Level 2
 Level 3
 Total
Millions       
Assets:       
Investments (a)
       
Available-for-sale – Equity Securities
$7.1
 
 
 
$7.1
Available-for-sale – Corporate and Governmental Debt Securities
 
$11.7
 
 11.7
Cash Equivalents1.3
 
 
 1.3
Total Fair Value of Assets
$8.4
 
$11.7
 
 
$20.1
        
Liabilities: (b)
       
Deferred Compensation
 
$16.0
 
 
$16.0
U.S. Water Services Contingent Consideration
 
 
$25.0
 25.0
Total Fair Value of Liabilities
 
$16.0
 
$25.0
 
$41.0
Total Net Fair Value of Assets (Liabilities)
$8.4
 $(4.3) $(25.0) $(20.9)

(a)Included in Other InvestmentsNon-Current Assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
(b)As of December 31, 2019, the aggregate amount of available-for-sale corporate and governmental debt securities maturing in one year or less was $2.1 million, in one year to less than three years was $7.2 million, in three years to less than five years was 0 and in five or more years was $0.4 million.
(c)Included in Other Non-Current Liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.


NOTE 7. FAIR VALUE (Continued)
 Fair Value as of December 31, 2018
Recurring Fair Value MeasuresLevel 1
 Level 2
 Level 3
 Total
Millions       
Assets:       
Investments (a)
       
Available-for-sale – Equity Securities
$12.2
 
 
 
$12.2
Available-for-sale – Corporate and Governmental Debt Securities
 
$8.0
 
 8.0
Cash Equivalents1.0
 
 
 1.0
Total Fair Value of Assets
$13.2
 
$8.0
 
 
$21.2
        
Liabilities: (b)
       
Deferred Compensation
 
$19.8
 
 
$19.8
U.S. Water Services Contingent Consideration
 
 
$3.8
 3.8
Total Fair Value of Liabilities
 
$19.8
 
$3.8
 
$23.6
Total Net Fair Value of Assets (Liabilities)
$13.2
 $(11.8) $(3.8) $(2.4)

(a)Included in Other Non-Current Assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
(b)Included in Other Non-Current Liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
 Fair Value as of December 31, 2015
Recurring Fair Value MeasuresLevel 1
 Level 2
 Level 3
 Total
Millions       
Assets:       
Investments (a)
       
Available-for-sale – Equity Securities
$7.6
 
 
 
$7.6
Available-for-sale – Corporate Debt Securities
 
$10.9
 
 10.9
Cash Equivalents2.0
 
 
 2.0
Total Fair Value of Assets
$9.6
 
$10.9
 
 
$20.5
        
Liabilities: (b)
       
Deferred Compensation
 
$16.1
 
 
$16.1
U.S. Water Services Contingent Consideration
 
 
$36.6
 36.6
Total Fair Value of Liabilities
 
$16.1
 
$36.6
 
$52.7
Total Net Fair Value of Assets (Liabilities)
$9.6
 $(5.2) $(36.6) $(32.2)
(a)Included in Other Investments on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
(b)Included in Other Non-Current Liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.


The followingLevel 3 liability in the preceding table provides a reconciliationis related to the contingent consideration liability that resulted from the 2015 acquisition of the beginning and ending balances of the U.S. Water Services Contingent Consideration measured at fair value using Level 3 measurements as of December 31, 2016, and December 31, 2015. The acquisition contingent consideration was recorded at the acquisition date at its estimated fair value. The acquisition date fair value was measured basedServices. Based on the consideration expected to be transferred, discounted to present value. The discount rate was determined at the time of measurement in accordance with generally accepted valuation methods. The fair valueterms and conditions of the acquisition contingent consideration is remeasured to arrive at estimated fair value each reporting period with the change in fair value recognized as income or expenseagreement, a final payout of $3.8 million was made in the Consolidated Statement of Income. Changes to the fair value of the acquisition contingent consideration can result from changes in discount rates, timing of milestones that trigger payments, and the timing and amount of earnings estimates. Using different valuation assumptions, including earnings projections or discount rates, may result in different fair value measurements and expense (or income) in future periods. Management analyzes the fair value of the contingent liability on a quarterly basis and makes adjustments as appropriate.


NOTE 9. FAIR VALUE (Continued)

During the fourthfirst quarter of 2016, management assessed earnings estimates used in calculating the fair value of the U.S. Water Services contingent consideration liability and determined an adjustment was necessary to the liability’s carrying amount based on its assessment. As a result, we recorded a reduction of $13.6 million to the liability’s carrying amount which resulted in an after-tax gain of the same amount presented within Operating Expenses – Other in the Consolidated Statement of Income. The acquisition contingent consideration was measured at $25.0 million as of December 31, 2016.2019.

Recurring Fair Value Measures
Activity in Level 3
Millions
Balance as of December 31, 2014
Recognition of U.S. Water Services Contingent Consideration
$35.7
Accretion (a)
2.4
Payments(0.1)
Changes in Cash Flow Projections(1.4)
Balance as of December 31, 2015
$36.6
Accretion (a)
2.8
Payments(0.8)
Changes in Cash Flow Projections(13.6)
Balance as of December 31, 2016
$25.0
(a)Included in Interest Expense on the Consolidated Statement of Income.

The Company’s policy is to recognize transfers in and transfers out of Levels as of the actual date of the event or change in circumstances that caused the transfer. For the years ended December 31, 20162019 and 20152018, there were no0 transfers in or out of Levels 1, 2 or 3.


Fair Value of Financial Instruments. With the exception of the item listed in the following table, the estimated fair value of all financial instruments approximates the carrying amount. The fair value for the item listed in the following table was based on quoted market prices for the same or similar instruments (Level 2).
Financial InstrumentsCarrying Amount Fair Value
Millions   
Long-Term Debt, Including Long-Term Debt Due Within One Year   
December 31, 2019$1,622.6 $1,791.8
December 31, 2018$1,495.2 $1,534.6

Financial InstrumentsCarrying Amount Fair Value
Millions   
Long-Term Debt, Including Long-Term Debt Due Within One Year   
December 31, 2016$1,569.1 $1,653.8
December 31, 2015$1,605.0 $1,676.0


Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis. Non-financial assets such as equity method investments, goodwill, intangible assets, and property, plant and equipment are measured at fair value when there is an indicator of impairment and recorded at fair value only when an impairment is recognized.


Equity Method Investment. Our wholly-owned subsidiary, ALLETE Transmission Holdings, owns approximately 8 percent of ATC. (See Note 5. Investment in ATC.) Investments. The aggregate carrying amount of the investmentour equity investments was $135.6$197.6 million as of December 31, 20162019 ($124.5161.1 million as of December 31, 2015)2018). The Company assesses our investmentequity investments in ATC and Nobles 2 for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of our investment in ATCinvestments may not be recoverable. For the years ended December 31, 20162019 and 2015,2018, there were no0 indicators of impairment.

Goodwill. The Company assesses the impairment of goodwill annually in the fourth quarter and whenever an event occurs or circumstances change that would indicate that the carrying amount may be impaired. Substantially all of the Company’s goodwill is a result of the U.S. Water Services acquisition in February 2015. (See Note 6. Acquisitions.5. Equity Investments.) The aggregate carrying amount of goodwill was $131.2 million as of December 31, 2016 and $130.6 million as of December 31, 2015.



NOTE 9. FAIR VALUE (Continued)
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis (Continued)

Impairment testing for goodwill is done at the reporting unit level. An impairment loss is recognized when the carrying amount of the reporting unit’s net assets exceeds the estimated fair value of the reporting unit. The test for impairment requires us to make several estimates about fair value, most of which are based on projected future cash flows. The Company calculates the excess of each reporting unit's fair value over its carrying amount, including goodwill, utilizing a discounted cash flow analysis. Our annual impairment analysis for ALLETE Clean Energy indicated the carrying amount of ALLETE Clean Energy’s goodwill may be impaired, and additional analysis was performed to measure the impact of the goodwill impairment loss. It was determined that the implied fair value of ALLETE Clean Energy’s goodwill was less than the carrying amount, resulting in an impairment charge of $3.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, which represented the entire carrying amount of goodwill for ALLETE Clean Energy. Our annual impairment test for U.S. Water Services indicated that the estimated fair value of U.S. Water Services exceeded its carrying value, and no impairment existed. (See Note 1. Operations and Significant Accounting Policies.)

Intangible Assets. The Company assesses indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment annually in the fourth quarter. The Company also assesses indefinite-lived and definite-lived intangible assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an intangible asset may not be recoverable. Substantially all of the Company’s intangible assets are a result of the U.S. Water Services acquisition in February 2015. The aggregate carrying amount of intangible assets was $82.2 million as of December 31, 2016 ($84.6 million as of December 31, 2015). When events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an intangible asset may not be recoverable, the Company calculates the excess of an intangible asset's carrying amount over its undiscounted future cash flows. If the carrying amount is not recoverable, an impairment loss is recorded based on the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair value. The inputs used in the fair value analysis fall within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy due to the use of significant unobservable inputs to determine fair value. As of December 31, 2016, there have been no events or changes in circumstance which would indicate impairment of our intangible assets.

Property, Plant and Equipment. The Company assesses the impairment of property, plant, and equipment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of property, plant, and equipment assets may not be recoverable. The impairment of ALLETE Clean Energy’s goodwill primarily due to lower estimated energy prices in periods not under PSAs caused management to review ALLETE Clean Energy’s WTGs for impairment. Based on the results of the undiscounted cash flow analysis, the undiscounted future cash flows were adequate to recover the carrying value of the WTGs. (See Note 1. Operations and Significant Accounting Policies.) For the yearyears ended December 31, 2016,2019, and 2018, there were no indicatorswas 0 impairment of impairment.property, plant, and equipment.


NOTE 7. FAIR VALUE (Continued)

We believe that long-standing ratemaking practices approved by applicable state and federal regulatory commissions allow for the recovery of the remaining book value of retired plant assets. In 2015,a 2016 order, the MPUC accepted Minnesota Power retiredPower’s plans for Taconite Harbor, Unit 3 and converted Laskin to natural gas which were actions included in Minnesota Power’s MPUC-approved 2013 IRP. In an order dated July 18, 2016, the MPUC approved Minnesota Power’s 2015 IRP with modifications which contains the next steps in Minnesota Power’s EnergyForward plan including the economic idling of Taconite Harbor Units 1 and 2, which occurred in September 2016, and the ceasing of coal-fired operations at Taconite Harbor in 2020. (See Note 4. Regulatory Matters.) The MPUC order for the 2015 IRP also directsdirected Minnesota Power to retire Boswell Units 1 and 2 no later than 2022, required an analysis of generation and on October 19, 2016,demand response alternatives to be filed with a natural gas resource proposal, and required Minnesota Power announced thatto conduct request for proposals for additional wind, solar and demand response resource additions subject to further MPUC approvals. Minnesota Power retired Boswell Units 1 and 2 will be retired in the fourth quarter of 2018. As part of the 2016 general retail rate case, the MPUC allowed recovery of the remaining book value of Boswell Units 1 and 2 through 2022. We do not expect to record any impairment charge as a result of the retirement of Taconite Harbor Unit 3, or Boswell Units 1 and 2, the ceasing of coal-fired operations at Taconite Harbor Units 1 and 2 or the conversion of Laskin.Laskin to operate on natural gas. In addition, we expect to be able to continue depreciating these assets for at least their established remaining useful lives; however, we are unable to predict the impact of regulatory outcomes resulting in changes to their established remaining useful lives. (See Note 4. Regulatory Matters.) The net book values for Taconite Harbor and Boswell Units 1 and 2 as of December 31, 2016, were approximately $90 million and $30 million, respectively. We would seek recovery in a general rate case of additional depreciation expense as a result of material changes in useful lives.







NOTE 10.8. SHORT-TERM AND LONG-TERM DEBT


Short-Term Debt. As of December 31, 2016,2019, total short-term debt outstanding was $187.7$212.9 million ($37.357.5 million as of December 31, 2015)2018), consisted of long-term debt due within one year and included $0.6$0.4 million of unamortized debt issuance costs.


As of December 31, 2016,2019, we had consolidated bank lines of credit aggregating $409.0$407.0 million ($408.4407.0 million as of December 31, 2015)2018), the majoritymost of which expire in November 2019.January 2024. We had $11.1$62.0 million outstanding in standby letters of credit and no0 outstanding draws under our lines of credit as of December 31, 20162019 ($12.418.4 million in standby letters of credit and $1.6 million in0 outstanding draws outstanding as of December 31, 2015)2018).


On January 10, 2019, ALLETE entered into an amended and restated $400 million credit agreement (Credit Agreement). The Credit Agreement amended and restated ALLETE’s $400 million credit facility, which was scheduled to expire in October 2020. The Credit Agreement is unsecured, has a variable interest rate and will expire in January 2024. At ALLETE’s request and subject to certain conditions, the Credit Agreement may be increased by up to$150 million and ALLETE may make two requests to extend the maturity date, each for a one‑year extension. Advances may be used by ALLETE for general corporate purposes, to provide liquidity in support of ALLETE's commercial paper program and to issue up to $100 million in letters of credit.

Long-Term Debt. As of December 31, 2016,2019, total long-term debt outstanding was $1,370.4$1,400.9 million ($1,556.71,428.5 million as of December 31, 2015)2018) and included $10.4$8.4 million of unamortized debt issuance costs. The aggregate amount of long-term debt maturing in 20172020 is $188.3$213.3 million; $63.1 million in 2018; $55.2 million in 2019; $101.2 million in 2020; $96.4$98.6 million in 2021; $88.8 million in 2022; $88.8 million in 2023; $73.5 million in 2024; and $1,064.9$1,059.6 million thereafter. Substantially all of our regulated electric plant is subject to the lien of the mortgagemortgages collateralizing outstanding first mortgage bonds. The mortgages contain non-financial covenants customary in utility mortgages, including restrictions on our ability to incur liens, dispose of assets, and merge with other entities.


Minnesota Power is obligated to make financing payments for the Camp Ripley solar array totaling $1.4 million annually during the financing term, which expires in 2027. Minnesota Power has the option at the end of the financing term to renew for a two-year2‑year term, or to purchase the solar array for approximately $4 million. Minnesota Power anticipates exercising the purchase option when the term expires.


On December 8, 2016,March 1, 2019, ALLETE entered into an agreementissued and sold the following First Mortgage Bonds (the Bonds):
Maturity DatePrincipal AmountInterest Rate
March 1, 2029$70 Million4.08%
March 1, 2049$30 Million4.47%


ALLETE has the option to sell $80 millionprepay all or a portion of the Company's senior unsecured notes (the Notes)Bonds at its discretion, subject to certain institutional buyers ina make-whole provision. The Bonds are subject to additional terms and conditions which are customary for these types of transactions. ALLETE used the private placement market.proceeds from the sale of the Bonds to fund utility capital investment and for general corporate purposes. The Notes will beBonds were sold in reliance on an exemption from registration under Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, to institutional accredited investors. The Notes will be issued on or about June 1, 2017, carry an interest rate of 3.11 percent and mature on June 1, 2027.

Interest on the Notes is payable semi-annually on June 1 and December 1 of each year, commencing on December 1, 2017. The Company has the option to prepay all or a portion of the Notes at its discretion, subject to a make-whole provision. The Notes are subject to additional terms and conditions which are customary for these types of transactions. Proceeds from the sale of the Notes will be used to redeem debt, fund corporate growth opportunities and/or for general corporate purposes.




NOTE 10.8. SHORT-TERM AND LONG-TERM DEBT (Continued)
Long-Term Debt (Continued)

Long-Term Debt  
As of December 312016
2015
Millions  
First Mortgage Bonds  
7.70% Series Due 2016
$20.0
1.83% Series Due 2018
$50.0
50.0
8.17% Series Due 201942.0
42.0
5.28% Series Due 202035.0
35.0
2.80% Series Due 202040.0
40.0
4.85% Series Due 202115.0
15.0
3.02% Series Due 202160.0
60.0
3.40% Series Due 202275.0
75.0
6.02% Series Due 202375.0
75.0
3.69% Series Due 202460.0
60.0
4.90% Series Due 202530.0
30.0
5.10% Series Due 202530.0
30.0
3.20% Series Due 202675.0
75.0
5.99% Series Due 202760.0
60.0
3.30% Series Due 202840.0
40.0
3.74% Series Due 202950.0
50.0
3.86% Series Due 203060.0
60.0
5.69% Series Due 203650.0
50.0
6.00% Series Due 204035.0
35.0
5.82% Series Due 204045.0
45.0
4.08% Series Due 204285.0
85.0
4.21% Series Due 204360.0
60.0
4.95% Series Due 204440.0
40.0
5.05% Series Due 204440.0
40.0
4.39% Series Due 204450.0
50.0
Unsecured Term Loan Variable Rate Due 2017125.0
125.0
Senior Unsecured Notes 5.99% Due 201750.0
50.0
Variable Demand Revenue Refunding Bonds Series 1997 A Due 202013.5
13.5
Industrial Development Variable Rate Demand Refunding Revenue Bonds Series 2006, Due 202527.8
27.8
Armenia Mountain Senior Secured Notes 3.26% Due 202474.6
83.3
SWL&P First Mortgage Bonds 4.15% Series Due 202815.0
15.0
Other Long-Term Debt, 3.11% – 6.20% Due 2017 – 203761.2
68.4
Unamortized Debt Issuance Costs(11.0)(12.6)
Total Long-Term Debt1,558.1
1,592.4
Less: Due Within One Year187.7
35.7
Net Long-Term Debt
$1,370.4

$1,556.7
On August 14, 2019, ALLETE entered into an amended and restated $110.0 million term loan agreement (Term Loan). The Term Loan is unsecured and due on August 25, 2020, and may be prepaid at any time, subject to a make-whole provision. Interest on the Term Loan is payable monthly at a rate per annum equal to LIBOR plus 1.025 percent. Proceeds from the Term Loan were used for construction-related expenditures.
Long-Term Debt  
As of December 312019
2018
Millions  
First Mortgage Bonds  
8.17% Series Due 2019

$42.0
5.28% Series Due 2020
$35.0
35.0
2.80% Series Due 202040.0
40.0
4.85% Series Due 202115.0
15.0
3.02% Series Due 202160.0
60.0
3.40% Series Due 202275.0
75.0
6.02% Series Due 202375.0
75.0
3.69% Series Due 202460.0
60.0
4.90% Series Due 202530.0
30.0
5.10% Series Due 202530.0
30.0
3.20% Series Due 202675.0
75.0
5.99% Series Due 202760.0
60.0
3.30% Series Due 202840.0
40.0
4.08% Series Due 202970.0

3.74% Series Due 202950.0
50.0
3.86% Series Due 203060.0
60.0
5.69% Series Due 203650.0
50.0
6.00% Series Due 204035.0
35.0
5.82% Series Due 204045.0
45.0
4.08% Series Due 204285.0
85.0
4.21% Series Due 204360.0
60.0
4.95% Series Due 204440.0
40.0
5.05% Series Due 204440.0
40.0
4.39% Series Due 204450.0
50.0
4.07% Series Due 204860.0
60.0
4.47% Series Due 204930.0

Variable Demand Revenue Refunding Bonds Series 1997 A Due 202013.5
13.5
Unsecured Term Loan Variable Rate Due 2020110.0
10.0
Armenia Mountain Senior Secured Notes 3.26% Due 202447.8
57.2
Industrial Development Variable Rate Demand Refunding Revenue Bonds Series 2006, Due 202527.8
27.8
Senior Unsecured Notes 3.11% Due 202780.0
80.0
SWL&P First Mortgage Bonds 4.15% Series Due 202815.0
15.0
SWL&P First Mortgage Bonds 4.14% Series Due 204812.0
12.0
Other Long-Term Debt, 3.11% – 5.75% Due 2020 – 203746.5
67.7
Unamortized Debt Issuance Costs(8.8)(9.2)
Total Long-Term Debt1,613.8
1,486.0
Less: Due Within One Year212.9
57.5
Net Long-Term Debt
$1,400.9

$1,428.5






NOTE 10.8. SHORT-TERM AND LONG-TERM DEBT (Continued)

Long-Term Debt (Continued)

On January 10, 2020, ALLETE entered into a $200 million term loan agreement (Term Loan) and borrowed $60 million upon execution. The unsecured Term Loan provides for the ability to borrow up to an additional $140 million, is due on February 10, 2021, and may be repaid at any time. Interest is payable monthly at a rate per annum equal to LIBOR plus 0.55 percent. Proceeds from the Term Loan will be used for construction-related expenditures.

Financial Covenants. Our long-term debt arrangements contain customary covenants. In addition, our lines of credit and letters of credit supporting certain long-term debt arrangements contain financial covenants. Our compliance with financial covenants is not dependent on debt ratings. The most restrictive financial covenant requires ALLETE to maintain a ratio of indebtedness to total capitalization (as the amounts are calculated in accordance with the respective long-term debt arrangements) of less than or equal to 0.65 to 1.00, measured quarterly. As of December 31, 2016,2019, our ratio was approximately 0.450.42 to 1.00. Failure to meet this covenant would give rise to an event of default if not cured after notice from the lender, in which event ALLETE may need to pursue alternative sources of funding. Some of ALLETE’s debt arrangements contain “cross-default” provisions that would result in an event of default if there is a failure under other financing arrangements to meet payment terms or to observe other covenants that would result in an acceleration of payments due. ALLETE has no significant restrictions on its ability to pay dividends from retained earnings or net income. As of December 31, 20162019, ALLETE was in compliance with its financial covenants.




NOTE 11.9. COMMITMENTS, GUARANTEES AND CONTINGENCIES
 
The following table details the estimated minimum annual payments for certain long-term commitments:
As of December 31, 2016      
Millions2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Thereafter
Coal, Rail and Shipping Contracts
$27.9

$27.0

$1.8



Leasing Agreements
$13.7

$12.0

$10.7

$7.5

$5.9

$18.3
PPAs (a)

$98.0

$102.9

$105.5

$113.4

$143.3

$1,803.9
As of December 31, 2019      
Millions2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Thereafter
Capital Purchase Obligations
$292.7





Easements (a)

$5.0

$5.3

$5.4

$5.5

$5.5

$170.4
PPAs (b)

$113.0

$122.5

$145.5

$145.6

$138.5

$1,386.7
Other Purchase Obligations (c)

$22.8

$9.6




$0.1
(a)ExcludesEasement obligations represent the minimum payments for our land easement agreements at our wind energy facilities.
(b)Does not include the agreement with Manitoba Hydro expiring in 2022, as this contract is for surplus energy only, and the 133 MW agreement with Manitoba Hydro commencing in 2020, as our obligation under this contract is subject to construction of additional transmission capacity. Also excludesonly; Oliver Wind I and Oliver Wind II, as Minnesota Power only pays for energy as it is delivered.delivered; and the agreement with Nobles 2 commencing in 2020 as it is subject to construction of a wind energy facility. (See Power Purchase Agreements.)
(c)Consists of long-term service agreements for wind energy facilities and minimum purchase commitments under coal and rail contracts.


Coal, Rail and Shipping Contracts. Minnesota Power has coal supply agreements providing for the purchase of a significant portion of its coal requirements through December 2017 and a portion of its coal requirements through December 2021. Minnesota Power also has coal transportation agreements in place for the delivery of a significant portion of its coal requirements through December 2018. The delivered costs of fuel for Minnesota Power’s generation are recoverable from Minnesota Power’s utility customers through the fuel adjustment clause.

Leasing Agreements. BNI Energy is obligated to make lease payments for a dragline totaling $2.8 million annually during the lease term, which expires in 2027. BNI Energy has the option at the end of the lease term to renew the lease at fair market value, to purchase the dragline at fair market value, or to surrender the dragline and pay a $3.0 million termination fee. We also lease other properties and equipment under operating lease agreements with terms expiring through 2023. Total lease expense was $17.1 million in 2016 ($17.3 million in 2015; $14.8 million in 2014).



NOTE 11. COMMITMENTS, GUARANTEES AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued)

Power Purchase and Sales Agreements. Our long-term PPAs have been evaluated under the accounting guidance for variable interest entities. We have determined that either we have no variable interest in the PPAs, or where we do have variable interests, we are not the primary beneficiary; therefore, consolidation is not required. These conclusions are based on the fact that we do not have both control over activities that are most significant to the entity and an obligation to absorb losses or receive benefits from the entity’s performance. Our financial exposure relating to these PPAs is limited to our capacity and energy payments.


These agreements have also been evaluated under the accounting guidance for derivatives. We have determined that either these agreements are not derivatives, or if they are derivatives, the agreements qualify for the normal purchases and normal sales exemption to the accounting guidance; therefore, derivative accounting is not required.

Square Butte PPA. Minnesota Power has a PPA with Square Butte that extends through December 2026 (Agreement). Minnesota Power is obligated to pay its pro rata share of Square Butte’s costs based on its entitlement to the output of Square Butte’s 455 MW coal-firedcoal‑fired generating unit. Minnesota Power’s output entitlement under the Agreement is 50 percent for the remainder of the Agreement, subject to the provisions of the Minnkota Power PSA described in the following table. Minnesota Power’s payment obligation will be suspended if Square Butte fails to deliver any power, whether produced or purchased, for a period of one year. Square Butte’s costs consist primarily of debt service, operating and maintenance, depreciation and fuel expenses. As of December 31, 2016,2019, Square Butte had total debt outstanding of $327.7$280.7 million. Annual debt service for Square Butte is expected to be approximately $45$48.7 million annually through 2023 and $33.6 million in each of the next five years, 2017 through 2021,2024, of which Minnesota Power’s obligation is 50 percent. Fuel expenses are recoverable through Minnesota Power’s fuel adjustment clause and include the cost of coal purchased from BNI Energy under a long-term contract.



NOTE 9. COMMITMENTS, GUARANTEES AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued)
Power Purchase and Sales Agreements (Continued)

Minnesota Power’s cost of power purchased from Square Butte during 20162019 was $73.3$82.7 million ($77.878.0 million in 20152018; $70.1$75.7 million in 20142017). This reflects Minnesota Power’s pro rata share of total Square Butte costs based on the 50 percent output entitlement. Included in this amount was Minnesota Power’s pro rata share of interest expense of $9.6$8.3 million in 20162019 ($10.19.1 million in 20152018; $10.5$9.4 million in 20142017). Minnesota Power’s payments to Square Butte are approved as a purchased power expense for ratemaking purposes by both the MPUC and the FERC.


NOTE 11. COMMITMENTS, GUARANTEES AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued)
Power Purchase Agreements (Continued)


Minnesota Power has also entered into the following agreementsPPAs for the purchase or sale of capacity and energy as of December 31, 2016:2019:
CounterpartyQuantityProductCommencementExpirationPricing
PPAs     
Calpine Corporation25 MWCapacityJune 2019May 2026Fixed
Great River Energy     
PPA 150 MWCapacity / EnergyJune 2016May 2020(a)
PPA 250 MWCapacityJune 2016May 2020Fixed
PPA 350 MWCapacityJune 2017May 2020Fixed
Manitoba Hydro     
PPA 1(b)EnergyMay 2011April 2022Forward Market Prices
PPA 250 MWCapacity / EnergyJune 2015May 2020(c)
PPA 350 MWCapacityJune 2017May 2020Fixed
PPA 4 (d)
250 MWCapacity / EnergyJune 2020May 2035(e)
PPA 5 (d)
133 MWEnergy(f)(f)Forward Market Prices
Minnkota Power50 MWCapacity / EnergyJune 2016May 2020(g)
Nobles 2 (h)
(h)Capacity / Energy(h)(h)Fixed
Oliver Wind I(h)(i)EnergyDecember 2006December 20312040Fixed
Oliver Wind II(h)(i)EnergyDecember 2007December 20322040Fixed
Shell Energy50 MWEnergyJanuary 2017December 2019Fixed
TransAlta(i)EnergyJanuary 2017December 2019Fixed
PSAs
Basin
PSA 1100 MWCapacity / EnergyMay 2010April 2020(j)
PSA 2100 MWCapacityJune 2016June 2018Fixed
Minnkota Power(k)Capacity / EnergyJune 2014December 2026(k)
Silver Bay Power(l)EnergyJanuary 2017December 2031(m)

(a)The capacity price is fixed and the energy price is based on a formula that includes an annual fixed price component adjusted for changes in a natural gas index, as well as market prices.
(b)The energy purchased consists primarily of surplus hydro energy on Manitoba Hydro's system and is delivered on a non-firm basis. Minnesota Power will purchase at least one million1000000 MWh of energy over the contract term.
(c)The capacity and energy prices are adjusted annually by the change in a governmental inflationary index.
(d)Agreements are subject to the construction of additional transmission capacity between Manitobathe GNTL and the U.S., along with construction of new hydroelectric generating capacity in Manitoba.MMTP. (See Great Northern Transmission Line.)
(e)The capacity price is adjusted annually until 2020 by the change in a governmental inflationary index. The energy price is based on a formula that includes an annual fixed component adjusted for the change in a governmental inflationary index and a natural gas index, as well as market prices.
(f)The contract term shallwill be the 20-year period beginning on the in-service date for the GNTL. (See Great Northern Transmission Line.)
(g)The agreement includes a fixed capacity charge and energy prices that escalate at a fixed rate annually over the term.
(h)The PPA provides for the purchase of all output from a 250 MW wind energy facility to be constructed in southwest Minnesota for 20 years beginning upon commercial operation of the wind energy facility which is currently expected in fourth quarter of 2020. (See Note 4. Regulatory Matters and Note 5. Equity Investments.)
(i)The PPAs provide for the purchase of all output from the 50 MW Oliver Wind I and 48 MW Oliver Wind II wind energy facilities.






NOTE 9. COMMITMENTS, GUARANTEES AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued)
Power Purchase and Sales Agreements (Continued)

Minnesota Power has also entered into the following PSAs for the sale of capacity and energy as of December 31, 2019:
CounterpartyQuantityProductCommencementExpirationPricing
PSAs
Basin
PSA 1100 MWCapacity / EnergyMay 2010April 2020(a)
PSA 2(b)CapacityJune 2022May 2025Fixed
PSA 3100 MWCapacityJune 2025May 2028Fixed
Minnkota Power(c)Capacity / EnergyJune 2014December 2026(c)
Oconto Electric Cooperative25 MWCapacity / EnergyJanuary 2019May 2026Fixed
Silver Bay Power(d)EnergyJanuary 2017December 2031(e)
(i)The energy purchased under the 50 MW PPA is during off-peak hours and the 100 MW PPA is during on-peak hours.
(j)(a)The capacity charge is based on a fixed monthly schedule with a minimum annual escalation provision. The energy charge is based on a fixed monthly schedule and provides for annual escalation based on the cost of fuel. The agreement also allows Minnesota Power to recover a pro rata share of increased costs related to emissions that occur during the last five years of the contract.
(k)(b)
The agreement provides for 75 MW of capacity from June 1, 2022, through May 31, 2023, and increases to 125 MW of capacity from June 1, 2023, through May 31, 2025.
(c)Minnesota Power is selling a portion of its entitlement from Square Butte to Minnkota Power, resulting in Minnkota Power’s net entitlement increasing and Minnesota Power’s net entitlement decreasing until Minnesota Power’s share is eliminated at the end of 2025. Of Minnesota Power’s 50 percent output entitlement, it sold to Minnkota Power approximately 28 percent in 20162019 (28 percent in 2015; 23 percent2018 and in 2014)2017). (See Square Butte PPA.)
(l)(d)Silver Bay Power supplies approximately 90 MW of load to Northshore Mining, an affiliate of Silver Bay Power, which has been served predominately through self-generation by Silver Bay Power. In the years 2016 through 2019, Minnesota Power will supplysupplied Silver Bay Power with at least 50 MW of energy and Silver Bay Power will havehad the option to purchase additional energy from Minnesota Power as it transitionstransitioned away from self-generation. On December 31,In the third quarter of 2019, Silver Bay Power will cease itsceased self-generation and Minnesota Power will supplybegan supplying the full energy requirements for Silver Bay Power.
(m)(e)The energy pricing iswas fixed through 2019 with pricing in later years escalating at a fixed rate annually and adjusted for changes in a natural gas index.



Coal, Rail and Shipping Contracts. Minnesota Power has coal supply agreements providing for the purchase of a significant portion of its coal requirements through December 2021. Minnesota Power also has coal transportation agreements in place for the delivery of a significant portion of its coal requirements through December 2021. The costs of fuel and related transportation costs for Minnesota Power’s generation are recoverable from Minnesota Power’s utility customers through the fuel adjustment clause.
NOTE 11. COMMITMENTS, GUARANTEES AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued)

Transmission. We continue to make investments in transmission opportunities that strengthen or enhance the transmission grid or take advantage of our geographical location between sources of renewable energy and end users. These include the GNTL, investments to enhance our own transmission facilities, investments in other transmission assets (individually or in combination with others) and our investment in ATC.


Great Northern Transmission Line. As a condition of thea 250 MW long-term PPA entered into with Manitoba Hydro, construction of additional transmission capacity is required. As a result, Minnesota Power and Manitoba Hydro proposed construction ofis constructing the GNTL, an approximately 220-mile220‑mile 500-kV transmission line between Manitoba and Minnesota’s Iron Range that was proposed by Minnesota Power and Manitoba Hydro in order to strengthen the electric grid, enhance regional reliability and promote a greater exchange of sustainable energy.


The GNTL is subject to various federal and state regulatory approvals. In 2013, a certificate of need application was filed with the MPUC which was approved in a June 2015 order. Based on this order, Minnesota Power’s portion of the investments and expenditures for the project are eligible for cost recovery under its existing transmission cost recovery rider and are anticipated to be included in future transmission factor filings. (See Note 4. Regulatory Matters.) In a December 20152016 order, the FERC approved our request to recover on construction work in progress related to the GNTL from Minnesota Power’s wholesale customers. In 2014, Minnesota Power filed a route permit application with the MPUC and a request for a presidential permit to cross the U.S.-Canadian border with the U.S. Department of Energy. In an order dated April 11, 2016, the MPUC approved the route permit which largely follows Minnesota Power’s preferred route, includingfor the international border crossing,GNTL, and on November 16,in 2016, the U.S. Department of Energy issued a presidential permit to cross the U.S.-Canadian border, which was the final major regulatory approval needed before construction in the U.S. can begincould begin. Construction activities commenced in early 2017. Construction is expectedthe first quarter of 2017, and Minnesota Power expects the GNTL to be completed in 2020,complete and in-service by mid-2020. The total project cost in the U.S., including substation work, is estimated to be between $560approximately $700 million, and $710 million.of which Minnesota PowerPower’s portion is expected to be approximately $325 million; the difference will be recovered from a subsidiary of Manitoba Hydro as non-shareholder contributions to capital. Total project costs of $633.3 million have majority ownershipbeen incurred through December 31, 2019, of the transmission line.which $339.6 million has been recovered from a subsidiary of Manitoba Hydro.



Manitoba Hydro must obtain regulatory and governmental approvals related to a new transmission line in Canada.
NOTE 9. COMMITMENTS, GUARANTEES AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued)
Transmission (Continued)

In September 2015, Manitoba Hydro submitted the final preferred route and EIS for the transmission line in CanadaMMTP to the Manitoba Conservation and Water Stewardship for siting and environmental approval, which was received on April 4, 2019. In 2016, Manitoba Hydro filed an application with the Canadian National Energy Board (NEB) requesting authorization to construct and operate the MMTP, which was recommended for approval on November 15, 2018. On June 14, 2019, Manitoba Hydro announced Canada’s federal government approved the MMTP project and on August 22, 2019, the NEB granted final pre-construction approvals. Construction on the MMTP commenced in the third quarter of 2019.

The MMTP is subject to legal and regulatory approval. challenges which Minnesota Power is actively monitoring. Manitoba Hydro has informed Minnesota Power that it continues to work towards completing the MMTP on schedule. In order to meet the transmission in‑service requirements in PPAs with Minnesota Power, Manitoba Hydro had indicated that it would need to start construction of the MMTP by September 2019. We are unable to predict the outcome of the Canadian regulatory review process, including the timing thereof or whether any onerous conditions may be imposed, or the timing of the completion of the MMTP, including the impact of any delays that may result in construction schedule adjustments. In the event the MMTP is delayed and not in-service by June 1, 2020, Minnesota Power has construction and related agreements in place with Manitoba Hydro and a Manitoba Hydro subsidiary that will protect Minnesota Power and its customers.

Construction of Manitoba Hydro’s Keeyask hydroelectric generation facility, which will provide the power to be sold under PPAs with Minnesota Power and transmitted on the MMTP and the GNTL, commenced in 2014.2014 and is anticipated to be completely in service by early 2021.


Environmental Matters.


Our businesses are subject to regulation of environmental matters by various federal, state and local authorities. A number of regulatory changes to the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act and various waste management requirements have recently been promulgated by both the EPA and state authorities.authorities over the past several years. Minnesota Power’s facilities are subject to additional regulationrequirements under many of these regulations. In response to these regulations, Minnesota Power is reshaping its generation portfolio, over time, to reduce its reliance on coal, has installed cost-effective emission control technology, and advocates for sound science and policy during rulemaking implementation.


We consider our businesses to be in substantial compliance with currently applicable environmental regulations and believe all necessary permits to conduct such operations have been obtained. We anticipate that with many state and federal environmental regulations and requirements finalized, or to be finalized in the near future, potential expenditures for future environmental matters may be material and may require significant capital investments. Minnesota Power has evaluated various environmental compliance scenarios using possible outcomes of environmental regulations to project power supply trends and impacts on customers.


We review environmental matters on a quarterly basis. Accruals for environmental matters are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be reasonably estimated based on current law and existing technologies. Accruals are adjusted as assessment and remediation efforts progress, or as additional technical or legal information becomes available. Accruals for environmental liabilities are included in the Consolidated Balance Sheet at undiscounted amounts and exclude claims for recoveries from insurance or other third parties. Costs related to environmental contamination treatment and cleanup are expensed unless recoverable in rates from customers.


Air. The electric utility industry is regulated both at the federal and state level to address air emissions. Minnesota Power’s generating facilities mainly burn low-sulfur western sub-bituminous coal. All of Minnesota Power’s coal-fired generating facilities are equipped with pollution control equipment such as scrubbers, baghouses and low NOX technologies. Under currently applicable environmental regulations, these facilities are substantially compliant with emission requirements.



NOTE 11. COMMITMENTS, GUARANTEES AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued)
Environmental Matters (Continued)

New Source Review (NSR). In 2008, Minnesota Power received a Notice of Violation (NOV) from the EPA asserting violations of the NSR requirements of the Clean Air Act at Boswell and Laskin Unit 2 between the years of 1981 and 2001. Minnesota Power received an additional NOV in April 2011 alleging that two projects undertaken at Rapids Energy Center in 2004 and 2005 should have been reviewed under the NSR requirements and that the Rapids Energy Center’s Title V permit was violated. Minnesota Power reached a settlement with the EPA regarding these NOVs and entered into a Consent Decree which was approved by the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota in 2014. The Consent Decree provided for, among other requirements, more stringent emissions limits at all affected units, the option of refueling, retrofits or retirements at certain small coal units, and the addition of 200 MW of wind energy. Provisions of the Consent Decree require that, by no later than December 31, 2018, Boswell Units 1 and 2 must be retired, refueled, repowered, or emissions rerouted through existing emission control technology at Boswell. On October 19, 2016, Minnesota Power announced that Boswell Units 1 and 2 will be retired in 2018 as the latest step in its EnergyForward strategic plan. We believe that costs to retire will be eligible for recovery in rates over time, subject to regulatory approval in a rate proceeding.

Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR). The CSAPR requires a total of 28certain states in the eastern half of the U.S., including Minnesota, to reduce power plant emissions that contribute to ozone or fine particulate pollution in other states. The CSAPR does not require installation of controls; rather it requires thatcontrols but does require facilities have sufficient allowances to cover their emissions on an annual basis. These allowances are allocated to facilities from each state’s annual budget, and can be bought and sold.

In 2014, the EPA distributed the CSAPR allowances to CSAPR-subject units for the Phase I years (2015 and 2016). Phase II allowances (2017 and beyond) for 2017 and 2018 were distributed on June 29, 2016. Based on our review of the NOx and SO2 Phase I and Phase II allowances already issued and Phase II allowances not yet issued,pending issuance, we currently expect projected generation levels and emission rates will result in compliance in both Phase I and Phase II.

Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS) Rule (formerly known as the Electric Generating Unit Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) Rule). Under Section 112 of the Clean Air Act, the EPA is required to set emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) for certain source categories. The EPA published the final MATS rule in the Federal Register in 2012, addressing such emissions from coal-fired utility units greater than 25 MW. There are currently 187 listed HAPs that the EPA is required to evaluate for establishment of MACT standards. In the final MATS rule, the EPA established categories of HAPs, including mercury, trace metals other than mercury, acid gases, dioxin/furans and organics other than dioxin/furans. The EPA also established emission limits for the first three categories of HAPs and work practice standards for the remaining categories. Affected sources were required to be incontinued compliance with the rule by April 2015. States had the authority to grant sources a one-year extension. The MPCA approved Minnesota Power’s request for an extension of the date of compliance for the Boswell Unit 4 environmental upgrade to April 1, 2016. Construction on the project to implement the Boswell Unit 4 mercury emissions reduction plan was completed in 2015. Boswell Unit 3 is also subject to the MATS rule; however, investments and compliance work completed at Boswell Unit 3, including the emission reduction investments completed in 2009, meet the requirements of the MATS rule. The conversion of Laskin Units 1 and 2 to natural gas in June 2015 positioned those units for MATS compliance.CSAPR.

In June 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed and remanded an earlier U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit decision on the MATS rule. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that it was unreasonable for the EPA to deem cost of compliance irrelevant in determining that regulation of emissions of hazardous air pollutants from power plants was “appropriate and necessary” under Section 112 of the Clean Air Act. The MATS rule remains in effect until the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit acts on the remand. In December 2015, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit rejected a motion by utilities and states to vacate the MATS rule, instead ordering the rule to remain in effect while the EPA completes its review. On April 15, 2016, the EPA announced its determination that the MATS rule is appropriate and necessary, even after considering cost of compliance. The outcome of these proceedings is not expected to have a material impact on Minnesota Power generation due to emission reduction obligations under the Minnesota Mercury Emissions Reduction Act and the Consent Decree. (See New Source Review.)

Minnesota Mercury Emissions Reduction Act/Rule. In order to comply with the 2006 Minnesota Mercury Emissions Reduction Act, which was incorporated into rules promulgated by the MPCA in September 2014, Minnesota Power was required to implement a mercury emissions reduction project for Boswell Unit 4 by December 31, 2018. The Boswell Unit 4 environmental upgrade discussed above (see Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS) Rule) fulfills the requirements of the Minnesota Mercury Emissions Reduction Act.



NOTE 11.9. COMMITMENTS, GUARANTEES AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued)
Environmental Matters (Continued)


EPA National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Major Sources: Industrial, Commercial and Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters. A final rule issued by the EPA for Industrial Boiler MACT became effective in 2012. Major existing sources had until January 31, 2016, to achieve compliance with the final rule and July 29, 2016, to perform initial compliance demonstrations. Minnesota Power’s Hibbard Renewable Energy Center and Rapids Energy Center are subject to this rule and are currently in compliance. Compliance consists largely of adjustments to our operating practices; therefore, the costs for complying with the final rule are not expected to be material.

National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). The EPA is required to review the NAAQS every five years. If the EPA determines that a state’s air quality is not in compliance with the NAAQS, the state is required to adopt plans describing how it will reduce emissions to attain the NAAQS. These state plans often include more stringent air emission limitations on sourcesNone of air pollutants than the NAAQS. Four NAAQS have either recently been revised or are currently proposed for revision, as described below.

Ozone NAAQS. The EPA has proposed more stringent control related to emissions that result in ground level ozone. In 2010, the EPA proposed to revise the 2008 eight-hour ozone standard of 75 parts per billion (ppb) and to adopt a secondary standard for the protection of sensitive vegetation from ozone-related damage. In October 2015, the EPA published the final rule in the Federal Register revising the eight-hour ozone standard to 70 ppb with a secondary standard also set at 70 ppb. All areas of Minnesota currently meet the new standard based on the most recent available ambient monitoring data; however, some areas in the metropolitan Twin Cities and southwest portion of the state are close to exceeding the standard. As a result, voluntary efforts to reduce ozone continue in the state. No additional costs for compliance are anticipated at this time.

Particulate Matter NAAQS. The EPA finalized the Particulate Matter NAAQS in 2006. Since then, the EPA has established more stringent 24-hour and annual average fine particulate matter (PM2.5) standards; the 24-hour coarse particulate matter standard has remained unchanged. In 2012, the EPA issued a final rule implementing a more stringent annual PM2.5 standard, while retaining the current 24-hour PM2.5 standard. To implement the new annual PM2.5 standard, the EPA is revising aspects of relevant monitoring, designation and permitting requirements. New projects and permits must comply with the new standard, which is generally demonstrated by modeling at the facility level.

Under the final rule, states will be responsible for additional PM2.5 monitoring, which will likely be accomplished by relocating or repurposing existing monitors. The EPA asked states to submit attainment designations by 2013, based on already available monitoring data, and issued designations of the 2012 revised primary annual fine particulate attainment status in 2014. The EPA designated the entire state of Minnesota as unclassifiable/attainment; however, Minnesota sources may ultimately be required to reduce their emissions to assist with attainment in neighboring states. On September 27, 2016, environmental groups filed a lawsuit against the EPA in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California alleging the EPA had failed to fully implement the PM2.5 standards in 24 states, including Minnesota, by not enforcing states’ submittals of required infrastructure SIPs for the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS. The outcome of this litigation is uncertain, and as such any costs for complying with the final Particulate Matter NAAQS cannot be estimated at this time.

SO2 and NO2 NAAQS. During 2010, the EPA finalized one-hour NAAQS for SO2 and NO2. Ambient monitoring data indicates that Minnesota is likely in compliance with these standards; however, the one-hour SO2 NAAQS also requires the EPA to evaluate additional modeling and monitoring considerations to determine attainment. In 2012, the MPCA notified Minnesota Power that modeling had been suspended as a result of the EPA’s announcement that the SIP submittals would not require modeling demonstrations for states, such as Minnesota, where ambient monitors indicate compliance with the standard. The EPA notified states that their infrastructure SIPs for maintaining attainment of the standard were required to be submitted to the EPA for approval by 2013. However, the State of Minnesota delayed completing the documents pending EPA guidance to states for preparing the SIP submittal.

In 2013, the EPA provided guidance to states regarding implementation of the one-hour NO2 NAAQS and in 2014, as clarified in February 2015, the MPCA submitted a SIP revision to the EPA addressing the infrastructure requirements of Sections 110(a)(1) and 110(a)(2) of the Clean Air Act in regards to the one-hour NO2 and SO2 NAAQS, among other standards. The SIP stated that since the EPA determined in 2012 that no area in the country is in violation of the one-hour NO2 NAAQS, there are no nonattainment areas in the country for this pollutant, and therefore Minnesota’s NO2 emissions cannot be significantly contributing to nonattainment in any other state. In October 2015, the EPA published in the Federal Register an approval and partial disapproval of the 2014 SIP revision. According to the MPCA, the partial disapproval is regarding state delegation of a program unrelated to the one-hour NAAQS for SO2 and NO2, and is not expected to require further action. As such, additional compliance costs for the one-hour NO2proposed or current NAAQS revisions are not expected at this time. 


NOTE 11. COMMITMENTS, GUARANTEES AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued)
Environmental Matters (Continued)

In August 2015, the EPA finalized the SO2 data requirements rule (DRR) for the 2010 one-hour NAAQS to assist the states in implementing the standard. The rule sets emissions thresholds and exemptions for facilities that trigger modeling requirements. On January 8, 2016, the MPCA informed the EPA of the Minnesota sources subject to the rule, confirming that Boswell and Taconite Harbor are the only Minnesota Power generating facilities subject to the DRR. The MPCA was required to notify the EPA as to how each source will evaluate air quality by July 1, 2016. Compliance options include ambient monitoring, modeling existing enforceable emission limits, or modeling actual emissions. The MPCA initially informed Minnesota Power that compliant SO2 modeling recently completed at these facilities would satisfy the DRR obligations and no further modeling would be required; however, the DRR also requires facilities have federally-enforceable permit limits at which the one-hour SO2 NAAQS compliance was modeled by January 13, 2017. Taconite Harbor was issued an amended air permit on September 1, 2016, containing the new modeling limits at that facility. The MPCA did not meet the January 13, 2017, deadline to amend the Boswell permit. The MPCA is in discussions with the EPA on alternate compliance pathways to use existing completed modeling at current limits. Compliance costs for the one-hour SO2 NAAQS are not expected to be material.

Class I Air Quality Petitions and Requests. In 2014, the Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa (Fond du Lac Band) announced its intent to petition the EPA to redesignate its reservation air shed from Class II to Class I air quality pursuant to Section 164(c) of the Clean Air Act. The Fond du Lac Band does not currently possess authority to directly regulate air quality. Class I air shed status, if granted, would allow the Fond du Lac Band to impose more stringent Clean Air Act protections within the boundaries of the Fond du Lac reservation, including the reservation air shed, near Cloquet, Minnesota. Five other reservations across the U.S. have received Class I status. A public hearing was held by the Fond du Lac Band in October 2014, and the extended public comment period on the petition expired in November 2014. After the Fond du Lac Band prepares responses to the comments, it is anticipated to make a formal submittal request to the EPA. 

In 2013, the Bad River Band of Lake Superior Chippewa (Bad River Band) announced its intent to petition the EPA to redesignate its reservation air shed, which is located approximately 100 miles east of Duluth, Minnesota, from Class II to Class I air quality pursuant to Section 164(c) of the Clean Air Act. The Class I analysis report was issued by the Bad River Band in January 2015 which was followed by public hearings in March 2015 and a public comment period ending in May 2015. After the Bad River Band prepares responses to the comments, it is also anticipated to make a formal submittal request to the EPA.

There is no deadline for the approval, denial, or modification of these requests by the EPA. We are unable to determine the impact of potential Class I status on the Company’s operations at this time. 

Climate Change. The scientific community generally accepts that emissions of GHG are linked to global climate change which creates physical and financial risks. Physical risks could include, but are not limited to: increased or decreased precipitation and water levels in lakes and rivers; increased temperatures; and changes in the intensity and frequency of extreme weather events. These all have the potential to affect the Company’s business and operations. We are addressing climate change by taking the following steps that also ensure reliable and environmentally compliant generation resources to meet our customers’ requirements:


Expanding renewable power supply for both our renewable energy supply;operations and the operations of others;
Providing energy conservation initiatives for our customers and engaging in other demand side management efforts;
Improving efficiency of our energy generating facilities;
Supporting research of technologies to reduce carbon emissions from generationgenerating facilities and carbon sequestration efforts; and
Evaluating and developing less carbon intensive future generating assets such as efficient and flexible natural gasgas‑fired generating facilities.facilities;

Managing vegetation on right-of-way corridors to reduce potential wildfire or storm damage risks; and
President Obama’s Climate Action Plan. In 2015, President Obama announced an updated Climate Action Plan (CAP) that calls for implementation of measures that reduce GHG emissionsPracticing sound forestry management in the U.S., emphasizing means such as expanded deployment of renewable energy resources, energyour service territories to create landscapes more resilient to disruption from climate-related changes, including planting and resource conservation, energy efficiency improvements and a shift to fuel sources that have lower emissions. Certain portions of the CAP directly address electric utility GHG emissions.managing long-lived conifer species.


EPA Regulation of GHG Emissions. In 2010,On June 19, 2019, the EPA issuedfinalized several separate rulemakings regarding regulating carbon emissions from electric utility generating units.

The EPA repealed the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) and Title V Greenhouse Gas Tailoring Rule (Tailoring Rule). The Tailoring Rule establishes permitting thresholds required to address GHG emissions for new facilities, existing facilitiesClean Power Plan (CPP), following a determination by the EPA that undergo major modifications and other facilities characterized as major sourcesthe CPP exceeded the EPA’s statutory authority under the Clean Air Act’s Title V program. For our existing facilities,Act (CAA). The primary reason for this was that the rule does not require amending our existing Title V operating permitsCPP attempted to include GHG requirements. However, GHG requirements are likely to be added to our existing Title V operating permits by the MPCA as these permits are renewed or amended.


NOTE 11. COMMITMENTS, GUARANTEES AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued)
Environmental Matters (Continued)

In late 2010, the EPA issued guidance to permitting authorities and affected sources to facilitate incorporationregulate electric generating unit’s carbon emissions through measures outside of the Tailoring Rule permitting requirements into the Title V and PSD permitting programs.affected unit’s direct control. The guidance stated that the project-specific, top‑down Best Available Control Technology (BACT) determination process used for other pollutants will also be used to determine BACT for GHG emissions. Through sector-specific white papers, the EPA also provided examples and technical summaries of GHG emission control technologies and techniques the EPA considers available or likely to be available to sources. It is possible that these control technologies could be determined to be BACT on a project-by-project basis.

In 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court invalidated the aspect of the Tailoring Rule that established higher permitting thresholds for GHG than for other pollutants subject to PSD. However, the court also upheld the EPA’s power to require BACT for GHG from sources already subject to regulation under PSD. Minnesota Power’s coal-fired generating facilities are already subject to regulation under PSD, so we anticipate that ultimately PSD for GHG will apply to our facilities, but the timing of the promulgation of a replacement for the Tailoring Rule is uncertain. The PSD applies to existing facilities only when they undertake a major modification that increases emissions. At this time, we are unable to predict the compliance costs that we might incur.

On October 3, 2016, the EPA published a proposed rule in the Federal Register to revise its PSD and Title V regulatory provisions concerning GHG emissions. In this proposed rule, the EPA proposes to amend its regulations to clarify that a source’s obligation to obtain a PSD or Title V permit is triggered only by non-GHG pollutants. If the PSD or Title V permitting requirements are triggered by non-GHG, NSR pollutants, then these programs will also apply to the source’s GHG emissions. The proposed rule,CPP was first announced as currently written, is not expected to have a material impact on the Title V permitting for current operations.

In 2012, the EPA announced a proposed rule to apply CO2 emission New Source Performance Standards (NSPS), under Section 111(b) of the Clean Air Act, to new fossil fuel-fired electric generating units. The proposed NSPS would have applied only to new or re-powered units. Based on the volume of comments received, the EPA announced its intent to re-propose the rule. In 2013, the EPA retracted its 2012 proposal and announced the release of a revised NSPS for new or re-powered utility CO2 emissions.

In 2014, the EPA announced a proposed rule under Section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act for existing power plants entitled “Carbon Pollution Emission Guidelines for Existing Stationary Sources: Electric Generating Units”, also referred.

With the repeal of the CPP, the Affordable Clean Energy Rule was finalized. The rule establishes emissions guidelines for states to use when developing plans to limit carbon dioxide at coal-fired power plants. The rule identifies heat rate improvements made at individual units as the Cleanbest system of emission reduction. Affected facilities for Minnesota Power Plan (CPP). The EPA issued the final CPP in August 2015, together with a proposed federal implementation planinclude Boswell Units 3 and a model rule for emissions trading. Petitions for4 and Taconite Harbor 1 and 2. Based on our initial review of the rule, were filedmany of the candidate heat rate improvements are already installed on Boswell Units 3 and 4.

Additionally, the EPA finalized new regulations for the state implementation of the Affordable Clean Energy Rule and any future emission guidelines issued under CAA Section 111(d). States will have three years to submit State Implementation Plans (SIP), and the EPA has 12 months to review and approve those plans. Since the Affordable Clean Energy Rule allows states considerable flexibility in how to best implement its requirements, Minnesota Power plans to work closely with the U.S. CourtMPCA and the Minnesota Department of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. On February 9, 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court issued an order staying the effectiveness ofCommerce, who are currently co-reviewing the rule until afteras the appellate court process is complete. On September 27, 2016, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia heard oral arguments and is currently deliberating. The EPA is precluded from enforcing the CPP while the U.S. Supreme Court stay is in force; however, the MPCA has been holding a series of meetings on the CPP for educational and planning purposes in the interim. Minnesota Power has been actively involved in these MPCA meetings, and is closely monitoring the appeals process.

state develops its SIP. If upheld, the CPP would establish uniform CO2 emission performance rates for existing fossil fuel-fired and natural gas-fired combined cycle generating units, setting state-specific goals for CO2 emissions from the power sector. State goals were determined based on CPP source-specific performance emission rates and each state’s mix of power plants. The EPA maintains such goals are achievable if a state undertakesdoes not submit a combination of measures across its power sectorSIP or submits a SIP that constitutesis unacceptable to the EPA’s guideline for a Best System of Emission Reductions (BSER). BSER is comprised of three building blocks: 1) improved fossil fuel power plant efficiency, 2) increased reliance on low-emitting power sources by generating more electricity from existing natural gas combined cycle units, and 3) building more zero- and low-emitting power sources, including renewable energy. States may also choose to include avoided CO2 emissions from customer energy efficiency measures for credit towards meeting state goals.

State goals underEPA, the CPP are expressed as both mass-based and rate-based, and include interim goals to be met over the years 2022 through 2029, as well as a final goal to be met in 2030 and thereafter. Under the original schedule for the CPP, each state would have been required toEPA will develop a SIP by September 6, 2016, or by September 6, 2018, if granted an extension. Due to the U.S. Supreme Court order staying the effectiveness of the CPP, those SIP submittal dates are not currently in effect. If the CPP is upheld at the completion of the appellate court process, all of the CPP regulatory deadlines are expected to be reset based on the length of time that the appeals process takes.Federal Implementation Plan.



NOTE 11. COMMITMENTS, GUARANTEES AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued)
Environmental Matters (Continued)

In developing its plan, a state may choose to meet either the mass-based or the rate-based goals. Minnesota Power is currently evaluating the CPP as it relates to the State of Minnesota as well as its potential impact on the Company and is actively discussing potential compliance scenarios with regulatory agencies and in public stakeholder meetings. Minnesota hashad already initiated several measures consistent with those called for under the CAPnow repealed CPP and CPP.finalized Affordable Clean Energy Rule. Minnesota Power iscontinues implementing its EnergyForward strategic plan that provides for significant emission reductions and diversifying its electricity generation mix to include more renewable and natural gas energy. (See Note 4. Regulatory Matters.)

The EPA accepted comments through November 1, 2016, on the proposed Clean Energy Incentive Program (CEIP) that may be facilitated as part of the CPP. The CEIP would reassign CPP emission rate credits or allowances for certain early action or designated deployments of renewable energy and energy efficiency measures.

We are unable to predict the GHG emission compliance costs we might incur;incur as a result of the Affordable Clean Energy Rule and the resulting SIP; however, the costs could be material. Minnesota Power would seek recovery of any additional costs through a rate proceeding.


Minnesota’s Next Generation Energy Act of 2007. In April 2014, the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota ruled that part of Minnesota’s Next Generation Energy Act of 2007 (NEGA) violated the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution. The portions of the law which were ruled unconstitutional prohibited the importation of power from a new CO2-producing facility outside of Minnesota and prohibited the entry into new long-term PPAs that would increase CO2 emissions in Minnesota. The State of Minnesota appealed the decision to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit in 2014. On June 15, 2016, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit upheld the federal district court’s decision that part of the NEGA violated the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution. Minnesota Governor Dayton subsequently announced that the State of Minnesota would cease pursuing further appeals of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit’s decision.

Water. The Clean Water Act requires NPDES permits be obtained from the EPA (or, when delegated, from individual state pollution control agencies) for any wastewater discharged into navigable waters. We have obtained all necessary NPDES permits, including NPDES storm water permits for applicable facilities, to conduct our operations.

Clean Water Act - Aquatic Organisms. In 2011, the EPA announced proposed regulations under Section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act that set standards applicable to cooling water intake structures for the protection of aquatic organisms. The proposed regulations would require existing large power plants and manufacturing facilities that withdraw greater than 25 percent of water from adjacent water bodies for cooling purposes, and have a design intake flow of greater than 2 million gallons per day, to limit the number of aquatic organisms that are impacted by the facility’s intake structure or cooling system. The Section 316(b) rule was effective in 2014. The Section 316(b) standards will be implemented through NPDES permits issued to the covered facilities with compliance timing dependent on individual NPDES renewal schedules. No NPDES permits for Minnesota Power generating facilities have been re-issued containing Section 316(b) requirements since the final rule was published, so at this time we are unable to determine the final cost of compliance. Should the MPCA require significant modifications to Minnesota Power’s intake structures, a preliminary assessment suggests costs of compliance up to $15 million over the next 5 years. Minnesota Power would seek recovery of any additional costs through a general rate case.

NOTE 9. COMMITMENTS, GUARANTEES AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued)
Environmental Matters (Continued)

Steam Electric Power Generating Effluent Limitations Guidelines. In 2013,2015, the EPA announced proposed revisions to theissued revised federal effluent limitlimitation guidelines (ELG) for steam electric power generating stations under the Clean Water Act. The final ELG was issued in September 2015. It setsset effluent limits and prescribesprescribed BACT for several wastewater streams, including flue gas desulphurization (FGD) water, bottom ash transport water and coal combustion landfill leachate. TheIn 2017, the EPA announced a two-year postponement of the ELG rule also prohibits the dischargecompliance date of bottom and fly ash contact waters. Compliance with the final rule is required between November 1, 2018, to November 1, 2020, while the agency reconsiders the bottom ash transport water and December 31, 2023.FGD wastewater provisions. On April 12, 2019, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit vacated and remanded back to the EPA portions of the ELG that allowed for continued discharge of legacy wastewater and leachate. On November 22, 2019, the EPA published a draft rulemaking that proposes to allow re-use of bottom ash transport water in FGD scrubber systems with minor discharges related to maintaining system water balance. The proposed rulemaking would also allow future discharge of FGD wastewater discharge provided it meets new BACT standards. A final rulemaking is anticipated in mid to late 2020.


We are reviewing theThe final rule and evaluating itsELG's potential impact on Minnesota Power’sPower operations is primarily at Boswell. Boswell currently discharges bottom ash contact water through its NPDES permit, and also has a closed-loop FGD system that does not currently discharge to surface waters, but may do so in the future.future if additional water treatment measures are implemented. Under the finalcurrent ELG rule, bottom ash transport water discharge would not be allowed and bottomto surface waters must cease no later than December 31, 2023. Bottom ash contact water wouldwill either need to be re-used in a closed-loop process, routed to a FGD scrubber, or the bottom ash handling system wouldwill need to be converted to a dry process. If the FGD wastewater is discharged in the future, it would require additional wastewater treatment.The ELG rule provision regarding these two waste-streams are being reconsidered and may change prior to November 1, 2020. Efforts have been underway at Boswell for several years to reduce the amount of water discharged and evaluate potential re-usere‑use options in its plant processes. Additional efforts are underwayThe EPA’s additional reconsideration of legacy wastewater discharge requirements have the potential to determine if land applicationreduce timelines for dewatering Boswell’s existing bottom ash pond. The timing of certaina draft rule addressing legacy wastewater streams under a state disposal system may be feasible.and leachate is currently unknown.


NOTE 11. COMMITMENTS, GUARANTEES AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued)
Environmental Matters (Continued)


At this time, we cannot estimate what compliance costs we might incur related to these or other potential future water discharge regulations; however, the costs could be material, including costs associated with retrofits for bottom ash handling, pond dewatering, pond closure, and wastewater treatment and/or reuse.and re-use. Minnesota Power would seek recovery of any additional costs through a rate proceeding.


Solid and Hazardous Waste.The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 regulates the management and disposal of solid and hazardous wastes. We are required to notify the EPA of hazardous waste activity and, consequently, routinely submit the necessary reports to the EPA.


Coal Ash Management Facilities. Minnesota Power generatesstores or disposes coal ash at four of its electric generating facilities. One facility storesfacilities by the following methods: storing ash in lined onsite impoundments (ash ponds) with engineered liners and containment dikes. Another facility’s, disposing of dry ash is beneficially re-used. The other two facilities generatein a combined wood and coallined dry ash that is eitherlandfill, applying ash to land applied as an approved beneficial use or truckedand trucking ash to state permitted landfills.

Coal Combustion Residuals from Electric Utilities (CCR). In 2010,2015, the EPA proposed regulations for coal combustion residuals (CCR) generated bypublished the electric utility sector. The proposal sought comments on three general regulatory schemes for coal ashfinal rule regulating CCR as nonhazardous waste under Subtitle D of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) (non-hazardous) or Subtitle C of RCRA (hazardous).

The EPA issued the final CCR rule in 2014 under Subtitle D (non-hazardous) of RCRA and it was published in the Federal Register in April 2015.Register. The rule includes additional requirements for new landfill and impoundment construction, as well asand regulates closure activities for existing impoundments. In 2017, the EPA announced its intention to formally reconsider certain provisions of the CCR rule under Subtitle D of the RCRA and on March 15, 2018, published the first phase of the proposed rule revisions in the Federal Register. In July 2018, the EPA finalized a portion of those proposed revisions that extended certain deadlines by two years, and established alternative groundwater protection standards for certain constituents and the potential for risk‑based management options at facilities based on site characteristics. In August 2018, a U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia decision vacated specific provisions of the CCR rule related to certainoperation of clay-lined impoundments. In response to the August 2018 court decision and outstanding issues from litigation, the EPA proposed additional rule revisions in August and December 2019.

The EPA’s most recent proposed rule revisions are anticipated to be finalized in the first quarter of 2020 and could impact the timing of closure activities for Boswell’s existing clay-lined impoundments. Costs of CCR compliance forat Boswell are currently estimated to be between approximately $65 million and Laskin$120 million, and are expected to occur primarily over the next 10 years and be between approximately $65 million and $100 million. Recently, the EPA has indicated to Minnesota Power that the15 years. Compliance costs for CCR at Taconite Harbor landfill is aand Laskin are not expected to be material given CCR unit, based on EPA’s interpretation of the CCR Rule language. Minnesota Power has agreed to post the required CCR information for the Taconite Harbor landfill on Minnesota Power’s website while the CCR issue is resolved.units at these facilities are closed. Minnesota Power continues to work on minimizing costs through evaluation of beneficial re-use and recycling of CCR and CCR-relatedCCR‑related waters. Compliance costs, if any for CCR at Taconite Harbor are not expected to be material. Minnesota Power would seek recovery of any additional costs through a general rate case.proceeding.


NOTE 9. COMMITMENTS, GUARANTEES AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued)
Environmental Matters (Continued)

Other Environmental Matters. On November 28, 2016, U.S. Water Services received notice from the EPA regarding potential violations under the Federal Insecticide, FungicideMatters

Manufactured Gas Plant Site. We are reviewing and Rodenticide Act for the sale of certain chemicals without registration or that were misbranded. The potential violations primarily relate to salesaddressing environmental conditions at a former manufactured gas plant site located in 2013Superior, Wisconsin, and formerly operated by a U.S. Water Services subsidiary acquired in 2013. U.S. Water Services is cooperatingSWL&P. SWL&P has been working with the EPAWisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) in itsdetermining the extent and location of contamination at the site and surrounding properties. In June 2019, the WDNR approved the site investigation and authorized SWL&P to transition into the remedial design process. As of December 31, 2019, we have recorded a liability of approximately $7 million for remediation costs at this site (approximately $7 million as of December 31, 2018), and an associated regulatory asset as we expect recovery of these potential violations.remediation costs to be allowed by the PSCW. We are unableexpect to predictincur these costs over the outcome of this matter at this time, but we do not expect that any potential fines will have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.next four years.


Other Matters


ALLETE Clean Energy. ALLETE Clean Energy’s wind energy facilities have PSAs in place for their entire output and expire in various years between 20182020 and 2032.2039. As of December 31, 2016,2019, ALLETE Clean Energy has $14.6$64.3 million outstanding in standby letters of credit.


U.S. Water Services. BNI Energy.As of December 31, 2016, U.S. Water Services has $0.8 million outstanding in standby letters of credit.

BNI Energy. As of December 31, 2016,2019, BNI Energy had surety bonds outstanding of $49.9$67.7 million related to the reclamation liability for closing costs associated with its mine and mine facilities. Although its coal supply agreements obligate the customers to provide for the closing costs, additional assurance is required by federal and state regulations. In addition to the surety bonds, BNI Energy has secured a letter of credit for an additional $0.6 million to provide for BNI Energy’s total reclamation liability which is currently estimated at $47.5$67.3 million. BNI Energy does not believe it is likely that any of these outstanding surety bonds or the letter of credit will be drawn upon.


ALLETE Properties. As of December 31, 2016,2019, ALLETE Properties through its subsidiaries, had surety bonds outstanding and letters of credit to governmental entities totaling $8.6$4.8 million primarily related to development and maintenance obligations for various projects. The estimated cost of the remaining development work is approximately $5.4$2.3 million. ALLETE Properties does not believe it is likely that any of these outstanding surety bonds or letters of credit will be drawn upon.



NOTE 11. COMMITMENTS, GUARANTEES AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued)
Other Matters (Continued)

Community Development District Obligations. In 2005, the Town Center District issued $26.4 million of tax-exempt, 6.0 percent capital improvement revenue bonds, and in 2006, the Palm Coast Park District issued $31.8 million of tax-exempt, 5.7 percent special assessment bonds. The capital improvement revenue bonds and the special assessment bonds are payable over 31 years (by May 1, 2036 and 2037, respectively) and are secured by special assessments on the benefited land. The bond proceeds were used to pay for the construction of a portion of the major infrastructure improvements in each district and to mitigate traffic and environmental impacts. The assessments were billed to the landowners beginning in 2006 for the Town Center District and 2007 for the Palm Coast Park District. To the extent that weALLETE Properties still ownowns land at the time of the assessment, weit will incur the cost of ourits portion of these assessments, based upon ourits ownership of benefited property.

As of December 31, 2016,2019, we owned 7253 percent of the assessable land in the Town Center District (72(68 percent as of December 31, 2015)2018) and 92 percentNaN of the assessable land in the Palm Coast Park District (92(19 percent as of December 31, 2015)2018). At theseAs of December 31, 2019, ownership levels, our annual assessments related to capital improvement and special assessment bonds for the ALLETE Properties projects within these districts are approximately $1.4 million for the Town Center District and $2.1 million for theat Palm Coast Park District.Coast. As we sell property at these projects, the obligation to pay special assessments will pass to the new landowners. In accordance with accounting guidance, these bonds are not reflected as debt on theour Consolidated Balance Sheet.


Legal Proceedings.


We are involved in litigation arising in the normal course of business. Also in the normal course of business, we are involved in tax, regulatory and other governmental audits, inspections, investigations and other proceedings that involve state and federal taxes, safety, and compliance with regulations, rate base and cost of service issues, among other things. We do not expect the outcome of these matters to have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.






NOTE 12.10. COMMON STOCK AND EARNINGS PER SHARE
Summary of Common StockShares
Equity
 Thousands
Millions
Balance as of December 31, 201649,560

$1,295.3
Employee Stock Purchase Plan12
0.8
Invest Direct257
19.0
Options and Stock Awards22
3.6
Contributions to RSOP50
3.5
Equity Issuance Program1,000
65.7
Contributions to Pension216
13.5
Balance as of December 31, 201751,117
1,401.4
Employee Stock Purchase Plan11
0.8
Invest Direct277
20.7
Options and Stock Awards57
2.1
Contributions to RSOP47
3.5
Balance as of December 31, 201851,509
1,428.5
Employee Stock Purchase Plan8
0.7
Invest Direct38
3.0
Options and Stock Awards85
1.3
Contributions to RSOP39
3.2
Balance as of December 31, 201951,679

$1,436.7

Summary of Common StockShares
Equity
 Thousands
Millions
Balance as of December 31, 201341,401

$885.2
Employee Stock Purchase Program18
0.8
Invest Direct378
18.9
Options and Stock Awards78
8.0
Equity Issuance Program1,851
90.0
Forward Sale Agreement and Issuance1,807
85.2
Contributions to Pension396
19.5
Balance as of December 31, 201445,929
1,107.6
Employee Stock Purchase Program18
0.9
Invest Direct383
19.0
Options and Stock Awards43
8.6
Equity Issuance Program1,289
69.9
Forward Sale Agreement and Issuance1,413
65.4
Balance as of December 31, 201549,075
1,271.4
Employee Stock Purchase Program16
0.9
Invest Direct344
20.0
Options and Stock Awards65
3.7
Contributions to RSOP60
3.3
Equity Issuance Program130
8.0
Received for Sale of Land Inventory(130)(8.0)
Acquisition of Non-Controlling Interest
(4.0)
Balance as of December 31, 201649,560

$1,295.3



NOTE 12. COMMON STOCK AND EARNINGS PER SHARE (Continued)

Equity Issuance Program. We entered into a distribution agreement with Lampert Capital Markets, Inc., in 2008, as amended most recently in August 2016, with respect to the issuance and sale of up to an aggregate of 13.6 million shares of our common stock, without par value, of which 3.92.9 million shares remain available for issuance.issuance as of December 31, 2019. For the year ended December 31, 2016, 0.1 million2019, 0 shares of common stock were issued under this agreement resulting(NaN in net proceeds of $8.0 million (1.32018; 1.0 million shares for net proceeds of $69.9$65.7 million in 2015; 1.9 million shares for net proceeds of $90.0 million in 2014)2017). The shares issued in 2015 and 2014,2017 were offered and sold pursuant to Registration Statement No. 333-190335.333-212794. On August 1, 2016,July 31, 2019, we filed Registration Statement No. 333-212794,333-232905, pursuant to which the remaining shares will continue to be offered for sale, from time to time.

Contributions to Pension. For the year ended December 31, 2019, we contributed 0 shares of ALLETE common stock to our pension plan (NaN in 2018 and 0.2 million shares, which had an aggregate value of $13.5 million in 2017). The shares of ALLETE common stock contributed in 2017 were contributed in reliance upon an exemption available pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

Earnings Per Share. We compute basic earnings per share using the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during each period. The difference between basic and diluted earnings per share, if any, arises from outstanding stock options, non-vested restricted stock units and performance share awards granted under our Executive Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan and common shares under the forward sale agreement (described below). In accordance with accounting standards for earnings per share, no options to purchase shares of common stock were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share in 2016, 2015 and 2014.Plan.


Forward Sale Agreement and Issuance of Common Stock.In 2014, ALLETE entered into a confirmation of forward sale agreement (Agreement) with a forward counterparty in connection with a public offering of 2.8 million shares of ALLETE common stock.

Pursuant to the Agreement, the forward counterparty (or its affiliate) borrowed 2.8 million shares of ALLETE common stock from third parties and sold them to the underwriters. The forward sale price was $48.01 per share, subject to adjustment as provided in the Agreement. In 2014, ALLETE physically settled a portion of its obligations under the Agreement by delivering approximately 1.4 million shares of common stock in exchange for cash proceeds of $65.0 million, and in February 2015, ALLETE physically settled the remaining portion of its obligation under the Agreement by delivering approximately 1.4 million shares of common stock for cash proceeds of $65.4 million.

In connection with the public offering of the 2.8 million shares, ALLETE granted the underwriters an option to purchase up to an additional 0.4 million shares of ALLETE common stock (the option shares). The underwriters exercised the option in full and in March 2014, the Company issued and sold the option shares to the underwriters at a price to ALLETE equal to the initial forward sale price for proceeds of $20.2 million.

Contributions to Pension. On January 17, 2017, we contributed approximately 0.2 million shares of ALLETE common stock to our pension plan, which had an aggregate value of $13.5 million when contributed. No shares of ALLETE common stock were contributed to the pension plan for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015. In 2014, we contributed approximately 0.4 million shares of ALLETE common stock to our pension plan, which had an aggregate value of $19.5 million when contributed. These shares of ALLETE common stock were contributed in reliance upon an exemption available pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.



NOTE 12.10. COMMON STOCK AND EARNINGS PER SHARE (Continued)
Reconciliation of Basic and Diluted   
Earnings Per Share 
Dilutive
 
Year Ended December 31Basic
Securities
Diluted
Millions Except Per Share Amounts   
2019   
Net Income Attributable to ALLETE
$185.6
 
$185.6
Average Common Shares51.6
0.1
51.7
Earnings Per Share
$3.59
 
$3.59
2018   
Net Income Attributable to ALLETE
$174.1
 
$174.1
Average Common Shares51.3
0.2
51.5
Earnings Per Share
$3.39
 
$3.38
2017   
Net Income Attributable to ALLETE
$172.2
 
$172.2
Average Common Shares50.8
0.2
51.0
Earnings Per Share
$3.39
 
$3.38

Reconciliation of Basic and Diluted   
Earnings Per Share 
Dilutive
 
Year Ended December 31Basic
Securities
Diluted
Millions Except Per Share Amounts   
2016   
Net Income Attributable to ALLETE
$155.3



$155.3
Average Common Shares49.3
0.2
49.5
Earnings Per Share
$3.15



$3.14
2015   
Net Income Attributable to ALLETE
$141.1



$141.1
Average Common Shares48.3
0.1
48.4
Earnings Per Share
$2.92



$2.92
2014   
Net Income Attributable to ALLETE
$124.8



$124.8
Average Common Shares42.9
0.2
43.1
Earnings Per Share
$2.91



$2.90




NOTE 13.11. INCOME TAX EXPENSE
Income Tax Expense  
Year Ended December 312016
2015
2014
2019
2018
2017
Millions  
Current Tax Expense (a)
 
Current Income Tax Expense (a)
 
Federal

$1.1


State$0.4$0.22.9$0.1$0.3
Total Current Tax Expense
$0.4

$0.2

$4.0
Deferred Tax Expense 
Federal
$12.0

$19.4

$25.3
Total Current Income Tax Expense
$0.1

$0.3

$0.3
Deferred Income Tax Expense (Benefit) 
Federal (b)
$(27.8)$(26.2)
$12.1
Federal – Remeasurement of Deferred Income Taxes (c)


(13.0)
State8.1
6.5
8.2
21.7
11.0
15.8
Investment Tax Credit Amortization(0.7)(0.8)(0.8)(0.6)(0.6)(0.5)
Total Deferred Tax Expense
$19.4

$25.1

$32.7
Total Income Tax Expense
$19.8

$25.3

$36.7
Total Deferred Income Tax Expense (Benefit)$(6.7)$(15.8)
$14.4
Total Income Tax Expense (Benefit)$(6.6)$(15.5)
$14.7
(a)For the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014,2017, the federal and state current tax expense was minimal due to NOLs which resulted from the bonus depreciation provisions of the Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes Act of 2015, the Tax Increase Prevention Act of 2014 and the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012. The federalFederal and state NOLs will beare being carried forward to offset current and future taxable income. The
(b)For the years ended December 31, 2019, and 2018, the federal tax benefit is primarily due to production tax credits, and the reduction of the federal statutory tax rate from 35 percent to 21 percent enacted as part of the TCJA.
(c)For the year ended December 31, 2014, includes2017, the resolutionfederal deferred income tax benefit is due to the remeasurement of an Internal Revenue Service examination fordeferred income tax years 2005 through 2009assets and liabilities resulting from the impacts of initiatives implemented on the 2013 federal and state tax returns to utilize tax carryforwards that may have expired.TCJA.



NOTE 13.11. INCOME TAX EXPENSE (Continued).
Reconciliation of Taxes from Federal Statutory   
Rate to Total Income Tax Expense   
Year Ended December 312019
2018
2017
Millions   
Income Before Non-Controlling Interest and Income Taxes
$178.9

$158.6

$186.9
Statutory Federal Income Tax Rate21%21%35%
Income Taxes Computed at Statutory Federal Rate
$37.6

$33.3

$65.4
Increase (Decrease) in Tax Due to:   
State Income Taxes – Net of Federal Income Tax Benefit17.2
8.9
10.5
Production Tax Credits(50.7)(45.0)(45.1)
Regulatory Differences – Excess Deferred Tax Benefit (a)
(8.8)(8.2)1.2
U.S. Water Services Sale of Stock Basis Difference1.7


Change in Fair Value of Contingent Consideration
(0.4)
Remeasurement of Deferred Income Taxes (b)


(13.0)
Other(3.6)(4.1)(4.3)
Total Income Tax Expense (Benefit)
($6.6)
($15.5)
$14.7

(a)Excess deferred income taxes are being returned to customers under both the Average Rate Assumption Method and amortization periods as approved by regulators. (See Note 4. Regulatory Matters.)
(b)Deferred income tax benefit from the remeasurement of deferred income tax assets and liabilities resulting from the TCJA.
Reconciliation of Taxes from Federal Statutory   
Rate to Total Income Tax Expense   
Year Ended December 312016
2015
2014
Millions   
Income Before Non-Controlling Interest and Income Taxes
$175.6

$166.8

$162.2
Statutory Federal Income Tax Rate35%35%35%
Income Taxes Computed at 35 percent Statutory Federal Rate
$61.5

$58.4

$56.8
Increase (Decrease) in Tax Due to:   
State Income Taxes – Net of Federal Income Tax Benefit5.6
4.4
7.2
Regulatory Differences for Utility Plant(0.1)(0.6)(3.5)
Production Tax Credits(41.5)(37.0)(23.7)
Change in Fair Value of Contingent Consideration(3.8)

Other(1.9)0.1
(0.1)
Total Income Tax Expense
$19.8

$25.3

$36.7


The effective tax rate was 11.3a benefit of 3.7 percent for 2016 (15.22019 (benefit of 9.8 percent for 2015; 22.62018; expense of 7.9 percent for 2014)2017). The 2016, 2015, and 20142019 effective rates weretax rate was primarily impacted by production tax credits.credits and the gain on sale of U.S. Water Services. The 20162018 effective tax rate was alsoprimarily impacted by a decrease in the liability related to U.S. Water Services’ contingent consideration (see Note 9. Fair Value),production tax credits and the 2014reduction of the federal income tax rate from 35 percent to 21 percent enacted as part of the TCJA. The 2017 effective tax rate was alsoprimarily impacted by production tax credits and the deduction for AFUDC–Equity (included in Regulatory Differences for Utility Plant inremeasurement of deferred income tax assets and liabilities resulting from the preceding table).TCJA.
Deferred Income Tax Assets and Liabilities  
As of December 312019
2018
Millions  
Deferred Income Tax Assets  
Employee Benefits and Compensation
$49.9

$62.2
Property-Related76.9
95.2
NOL Carryforwards63.2
86.1
Tax Credit Carryforwards395.5
349.8
Power Sales Agreements23.7
27.5
Regulatory Liabilities116.9
113.4
Other23.4
25.1
Gross Deferred Income Tax Assets749.5
759.3
Deferred Income Tax Asset Valuation Allowance(70.0)(66.5)
Total Deferred Income Tax Assets
$679.5

$692.8
Deferred Income Tax Liabilities  
Property-Related
$713.4

$752.5
Regulatory Asset for Benefit Obligations54.5
61.0
Unamortized Investment Tax Credits31.6
32.2
Partnership Basis Differences49.4
40.8
Regulatory Assets35.4
29.9
Other8.0

Total Deferred Income Tax Liabilities
$892.3

$916.4
Net Deferred Income Taxes (a)

$212.8

$223.6
Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities  
As of December 312016
2015
Millions  
Deferred Tax Assets  
Employee Benefits and Compensation
$104.6

$105.4
Property Related117.8
126.6
NOL Carryforwards185.6
186.4
Tax Credit Carryforwards227.4
164.8
Power Sales Agreements59.3
73.0
Other46.9
21.8
Gross Deferred Tax Assets741.6
678.0
Deferred Tax Asset Valuation Allowance(43.0)(31.6)
Total Deferred Tax Assets
$698.6

$646.4
Deferred Tax Liabilities  
Property Related
$1,094.7

$1,053.0
Regulatory Asset for Benefit Obligations91.9
89.4
Unamortized Investment Tax Credits33.3
26.0
Partnership Basis Differences50.9
47.8
Other11.9
10.0
Total Deferred Tax Liabilities
$1,282.7

$1,226.2
Net Deferred Income Taxes (a)

$584.1

$579.8

(a)Recorded as a net long-term Deferred Income Tax liability on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.Sheet




NOTE 13.11. INCOME TAX EXPENSE (Continued).
NOL and Tax Credit Carryforwards  
As of December 3120192018
Millions  
Federal NOL Carryforwards (a)
$211.3
$319.0
Federal Tax Credit Carryforwards$302.5$256.4
State NOL Carryforwards (a)
$274.8$305.8
State Tax Credit Carryforwards (b)
$23.4$27.4
NOL and Tax Credit Carryforwards  
As of December 3120162015
Millions  
Federal NOL Carryforwards (a)
$485.3
$493.0
Federal Tax Credit Carryforwards$163.7$113.6
State NOL Carryforwards (a)
$294.4$228.6
State Tax Credit Carryforwards (b)
$21.0$20.0

(a)Pre-tax amounts.
(b)Net of a $42.7$69.6 million valuation allowance as of December 31, 20162019 ($31.266.0 million as of December 31, 2015)2018).


The federal NOL and tax credit carryforward periods expire between 20302031 and 2036.2039. We expect to fully utilize the federal NOL and federal tax credit carryforwards; therefore, no0 federal valuation allowance has been recognized as of December 31, 2016.2019. The state NOL and tax credit carryforward periods expire between 2024 and 2045. We have established a valuation allowance against certain state NOL and tax credits that we do not expect to utilize before their expiration.
Gross Unrecognized Income Tax Benefits2019
2018
2017
Millions   
Balance at January 1
$1.6

$1.7

$2.0
Additions for Tax Positions Related to the Current Year0.1
0.1
0.1
Additions for Tax Positions Related to Prior Years0.1
0.1
0.1
Reductions for Tax Positions Related to Prior Years(0.4)(0.2)(0.1)
Lapse of Statute
(0.1)(0.4)
Balance as of December 31
$1.4

$1.6

$1.7

Gross Unrecognized Income Tax Benefits2016
2015
2014
Millions   
Balance at January 1
$2.4

$2.0

$1.2
Additions for Tax Positions Related to the Current Year0.1
0.5

Additions for Tax Positions Related to Prior Years0.2
0.7
1.0
Reductions for Tax Positions Related to Prior Years(0.3)(0.7)
Lapse of Statute(0.4)(0.1)(0.2)
Balance as of December 31
$2.0

$2.4

$2.0


Unrecognized tax benefits are the differences between a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return and the benefit recognized and measured pursuant to the “more-likely-than-not” criteria. The unrecognized tax benefit balance includes permanent tax positions which, if recognized would affect the annual effective income tax rate. In addition, the unrecognized tax benefit balance includes temporary tax positions for which the ultimate deductibility is highly certain but for which there is uncertainty about the timing of such deductibility. A change in the period of deductibility would not affect the effective tax rate but would accelerate the payment of cash to the taxing authority to an earlier period. The gross unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2016,2019, included $0.6 million of net unrecognized tax benefits which, if recognized, would affect the annual effective income tax rate.


As of December 31, 2016,2019, we had no0 accrued interest (none(NaN as of December 31, 2015; none as of December 31, 2014)2018, and 2017) related to unrecognized tax benefits included on the Consolidated Balance Sheet due to our NOL carryforwards. We classify interest related to unrecognized tax benefits as interest expense and tax-related penalties in operating expenses on the Consolidated Statement of Income. Interest expense related to unrecognized tax benefits on the Consolidated Statement of Income was immaterial in 2016 (immaterial in 2015,2019, 2018 and in 2014)2017). There were no0 penalties recognized in 2016, 20152019, 2018 or 2014.2017. The unrecognized tax benefit amounts have been presented as reductions to the tax benefits associated with NOL and tax credit carryforwards on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.


NoNaN material changes to unrecognized tax benefits are expected during the next 12 months.


ALLETE and its subsidiaries file a consolidated federal income tax return as well as combined and separate state income tax returns in various jurisdictions. ALLETE has no open federal or state audits, and is no longer subject to federal examination for years before 20132016 or state examination for years before 2012.2015.





NOTE 14. RECLASSIFICATIONS OUT OF ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss.Comprehensive income (loss) is the change in shareholders’ equity during a period from transactions and events from non-owner sources, including net income. The amounts recorded to accumulated other comprehensive loss include unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities, defined benefit pension and other postretirement items, consisting of deferred actuarial gains or losses and prior service costs or credits, and gains and losses on derivatives accounted for as cash flow hedges.

Changes in accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax, for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, were as follows:
 
Unrealized Gain (Loss) on
Available-for-sale
Securities
Defined Benefit
Pension, Other
Postretirement
Items (a)
Gain
(Loss) on
Cash Flow
Hedge
Total
Millions    
Balance as of December 31, 2013$(0.1)$(16.7)$(0.3)$(17.1)
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Before Reclassifications(0.3)(5.2)0.2
(5.3)
Amounts Reclassified From Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss0.1
1.2

1.3
Net Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)(0.2)(4.0)0.2
(4.0)
Balance as of December 31, 2014(0.3)(20.7)(0.1)(21.1)
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Before Reclassifications(0.4)(4.3)0.1
(4.6)
Amounts Reclassified From Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss(0.1)1.3

1.2
Net Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)(0.5)(3.0)0.1
(3.4)
Balance as of December 31, 2015(0.8)(23.7)
(24.5)
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Before Reclassifications
(4.1)
(4.1)
Amounts Reclassified From Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss(0.2)0.6

0.4
Net Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)(0.2)(3.5)
(3.7)
Balance as of December 31, 2016$(1.0)$(27.2)
$(28.2)
(a)Defined benefit pension and other postretirement items excluded from our Regulated Operations are recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss and are subsequently reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive loss as components of net periodic pension and other postretirement benefit expense. (See Note 15. Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans.)





NOTE 15.12. PENSION AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS


We have noncontributory union, non-union and combined retiree defined benefit pension plans covering eligible employees. The combined retiree defined benefit pension plan was created on January 1,in 2016, to include all union and non-union retirees from the existing plans as of January 1, 2016. The plans provide defined benefits based on years of service and final average pay. We contributed $6.3$10.4 million in cash to the plans in 20162019 (none$15.0 million in 20152018; $19.5 million of ALLETE common stock in 2014). On January 13, 2017, we contributed $1.7 million in cash to the plans, and on January 17, 2017, we2017). We contributed $13.5 million0 shares of ALLETE common stock to the plans.plans in 2019 (NaN in 2018; 0.2 million shares, which had an aggregate value of $13.5 million in 2017). We also have a defined contribution RSOP covering substantially all employees. The 20162019 plan year employer contributions, which are made through the employee stock ownership plan portion of the RSOP, totaled $9.2$10.8 million ($9.0 million for the 2015 plan year; $9.1($11.4 million for the 20142018 plan year; $11.0 million for the 2017 plan year). (See Note 12.10. Common Stock and Earnings Per Share and Note 16.13. Employee Stock and Incentive Plans.)


In 2006, theThe non-union defined benefit pension plan was amended to suspendfrozen in 2018, and does not allow further crediting of service or earnings to the plan and to close the planplan. Further, it is closed to new participants. In conjunction with those amendments, contributions were increased to the RSOP. In 2010, theThe Minnesota Power union defined benefit pension plan was amended to close the planis also closed to new participants beginning February 1, 2011.participants.




NOTE 15. PENSION AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS (Continued)

We have postretirement health care and life insurance plans covering eligible employees. In 2010, ourthe postretirement health care plan was amended to close the planclosed to employees hired after January 31, 2011. The full2011, and the eligibility requirement was also amended in 2010, to require employees to be at least age 55 with 10 years of participation in the plan.requirements were amended. In 2014, ourthe postretirement life plan was amended to close the plan to non-union employees retiring after December 31, 2015.2015, and in 2018, the postretirement life plan was amended to limit the benefit level for union employees retiring after December 31, 2018. The postretirement health and life plans are contributory with participant contributions adjusted annually. Postretirement health and life benefits are funded through a combination of Voluntary Employee Benefit Association trusts (VEBAs), established under section 501(c)(9) of the Internal Revenue Code, and irrevocable grantor trusts. In 20162019, no0 contributions were made to the VEBAs (none(NaN in 2015; none2018; NaN in 2014)2017) and no0 contributions were made to the grantor trusts (none(NaN in 20152018; noneNaN in 2014)2017).


Management considers various factors when making funding decisions such as regulatory requirements, actuarially determined minimum contribution requirements and contributions required to avoid benefit restrictions for the pension plans. Contributions are based on estimates and assumptions which are subject to change. On January 15, 2020, we contributed $10.7 million in cash to the defined benefit pension plans. We do 0t expect noto make any additional contributions to the defined benefit pension plans in 2017 beyond the $15.2 million contributed in January 2017. We2020, and we do 0t expect noto make any contributions to the defined benefit postretirement health and life plans in 2017.2020.


Accounting for defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans requires that employers recognize on a prospective basis the funded status of their defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans on their balance sheet and recognize as a component of other comprehensive income, net of tax, the gains or losses and prior service costs or credits that arise during the period but are not recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost.


The defined benefit pension and postretirement health and life benefit expense (credit) recognized annually by our regulated utilities are expected to be recovered (refunded) through rates filed with our regulatory jurisdictions. As a result, these amounts that are required to otherwise be recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income have been recognized as a long-term regulatory asset (regulatory liability) on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, in accordance with the accounting standards for the effect of certain types of regulation applicable to our Regulated Operations. The defined benefit pension and postretirement health and life benefit expense (credits) associated with our other operations are recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income.

Pension Obligation and Funded Status
As of December 312016
2015
Millions  
Accumulated Benefit Obligation
$698.8

$665.0
Change in Benefit Obligation 
 
Obligation, Beginning of Year
$709.8

$714.5
Service Cost8.1
10.1
Interest Cost33.2
29.9
Actuarial (Gain) Loss12.4
(31.2)
Benefits Paid(44.5)(40.2)
Participant Contributions24.3
26.7
Obligation, End of Year
$743.3

$709.8
Change in Plan Assets 
 
Fair Value, Beginning of Year
$521.3

$544.2
Actual Return on Plan Assets48.8
(10.8)
Employer Contribution (a)
31.9
28.1
Benefits Paid(44.5)(40.2)
Fair Value, End of Year
$557.5

$521.3
Funded Status, End of Year$(185.8)$(188.5)
   
Net Pension Amounts Recognized in Consolidated Balance Sheet Consist of: 
 
Current Liabilities$(1.4)$(1.3)
Non-Current Liabilities$(184.4)$(187.2)

NOTE 12. PENSION AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS (Continued)
Pension Obligation and Funded Status
As of December 312019
2018
Millions  
Accumulated Benefit Obligation
$812.0

$713.7
Change in Benefit Obligation 
 
Obligation, Beginning of Year
$747.0

$793.2
Service Cost9.3
11.0
Interest Cost31.9
29.6
Plan Amendments
(1.5)
Plan Curtailments
(6.9)
Actuarial (Gain) Loss98.3
(53.0)
Benefits Paid(53.4)(49.5)
Participant Contributions20.9
24.1
Obligation, End of Year
$854.0

$747.0
Change in Plan Assets 
 
Fair Value, Beginning of Year
$598.0

$628.2
Actual Return on Plan Assets122.1
(21.2)
Employer Contribution (a)
32.9
40.5
Benefits Paid(53.4)(49.5)
Fair Value, End of Year
$699.6

$598.0
Funded Status, End of Year$(154.4)$(149.0)
   
Net Pension Amounts Recognized in Consolidated Balance Sheet Consist of: 
 
Current Liabilities$(1.6)$(1.6)
Non-Current Liabilities$(152.8)$(147.4)

(a)Includes Participant Contributions noted above.


NOTE 15. PENSION AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS (Continued)


The pension costs that are reported as a component within the Consolidated Balance Sheet, reflected in long-term regulatory assets or liabilities and accumulated other comprehensive income, consist of a net loss of $250.4$243.4 million and prior service credit of $1.3 million as of December 31, 20162019 (net loss of $252.7$230.5 million and prior service credit of $1.4 million as of December 31, 2015)2018).
Reconciliation of Net Pension Amounts Recognized in Consolidated Balance Sheet
As of December 312019
2018
Millions  
Net Loss$(243.4)$(230.5)
Prior Service Credit1.3
1.4
Accumulated Contributions in Excess of Net Periodic Benefit Cost (Prepaid Pension Asset)87.7
80.1
Total Net Pension Amounts Recognized in Consolidated Balance Sheet$(154.4)$(149.0)
Components of Net Periodic Pension Expense
Year Ended December 312016
2015
2014
Millions   
Service Cost
$8.1

$10.1

$8.3
Interest Cost33.2
29.9
29.8
Expected Return on Plan Assets(43.6)(40.7)(38.2)
Amortization of Loss9.5
17.9
14.2
Amortization of Prior Service Cost
0.2
0.3
Net Pension Expense
$7.2

$17.4

$14.4
Other Changes in Pension Plan Assets and Benefit Obligations Recognized in
Other Comprehensive Income and Regulatory Assets or Liabilities
Year Ended December 312016
2015
Millions  
Net Loss$7.2
$20.2
Amortization of Prior Service Cost
(0.2)
Amortization of Loss(9.5)(17.9)
Total Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income and Regulatory Assets or Liabilities$(2.3)
$2.1
Information for Pension Plans with an Accumulated Benefit Obligation in Excess of Plan Assets
As of December 312016
2015
Millions  
Projected Benefit Obligation
$743.3

$709.8
Accumulated Benefit Obligation
$698.8

$665.0
Fair Value of Plan Assets
$557.5

$521.3




NOTE 15.12. PENSION AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS (Continued)
Components of Net Periodic Pension Cost
Year Ended December 312019
2018
2017
Millions   
Service Cost
$9.3

$11.0

$10.2
Non-Service Cost Components (a)
   
Interest Cost31.9
29.6
32.5
Expected Return on Plan Assets(44.2)(44.4)(42.4)
Amortization of Loss7.5
11.4
9.9
Amortization of Prior Service Credit(0.1)(0.1)
Net Pension Cost
$4.4

$7.5

$10.2

(a)These components of net periodic pension cost are included in the line item “Other” under Other Income (Expense) on the Consolidated Statement of Income.
Other Changes in Pension Plan Assets and Benefit Obligations Recognized in
Other Comprehensive Income and Regulatory Assets or Liabilities
Year Ended December 312019
2018
Millions  
Net Loss$20.4$5.8
Amortization of Prior Service Credit0.1
0.1
Prior Service Credit Arising During the Period
(1.6)
Amortization of Loss(7.5)(11.4)
Total Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income and Regulatory Assets or Liabilities$13.0$(7.1)

Postretirement Health and Life Obligation and Funded Status
As of December 312016
2015
Millions  
Change in Benefit Obligation  
Obligation, Beginning of Year
$160.2

$170.9
Service Cost3.9
4.3
Interest Cost7.4
7.2
Actuarial (Gain) Loss11.9
(14.4)
Benefits Paid(13.1)(10.7)
Participant Contributions3.1
2.9
Obligation, End of Year
$173.4

$160.2
Change in Plan Assets  
Fair Value, Beginning of Year
$153.4

$163.2
Actual Return on Plan Assets9.6
(3.5)
Employer Contribution1.3
1.5
Participant Contributions3.1
2.9
Benefits Paid(13.1)(10.7)
Fair Value, End of Year
$154.3

$153.4
Funded Status, End of Year$(19.1)$(6.8)
   
Net Postretirement Health and Life Amounts Recognized in Consolidated Balance Sheet Consist of:  
Non-Current Assets$1.4$6.4
Current Liabilities$(1.1)$(1.0)
Non-Current Liabilities$(19.4)$(12.2)
Information for Pension Plans with an Accumulated Benefit Obligation in Excess of Plan Assets
As of December 312019
2018
Millions  
Projected Benefit Obligation
$854.0

$747.0
Accumulated Benefit Obligation
$812.0

$713.7
Fair Value of Plan Assets
$699.6

$598.0



NOTE 12. PENSION AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS (Continued)
Postretirement Health and Life Obligation and Funded Status
As of December 312019
2018
Millions  
Change in Benefit Obligation  
Obligation, Beginning of Year
$176.0

$190.1
Service Cost3.9
4.7
Interest Cost7.3
7.1
Actuarial (Gain) Loss10.5
(15.8)
Benefits Paid(14.7)(11.6)
Participant Contributions3.5
3.6
Plan Amendments (a)
(34.6)(2.1)
Plan Curtailments(2.1)
Obligation, End of Year
$149.8

$176.0
Change in Plan Assets  
Fair Value, Beginning of Year
$154.3

$171.0
Actual Return on Plan Assets29.5
(9.6)
Employer Contribution1.1
1.0
Participant Contributions3.5
3.6
Benefits Paid(14.7)(11.7)
Fair Value, End of Year
$173.7

$154.3
Funded Status, End of Year$23.9$(21.7)
   
Net Postretirement Health and Life Amounts Recognized in Consolidated Balance Sheet Consist of:  
Non-Current Assets$37.5$0.4
Current Liabilities$(0.7)$(1.0)
Non-Current Liabilities$(12.9)$(21.1)

(a)Plan design changes under the other postretirement benefit plans resulted in a decrease to the benefit obligation of $34.6 million in 2019.

According to the accounting standards for retirement benefits, only assets in the VEBAs are treated as plan assets in the abovepreceding table for the purpose of determining funded status. In addition to the postretirement health and life assets reported in the previous table, we had $17.6$19.1 million in irrevocable grantor trusts included in Other Investments on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 20162019 ($17.418.3 million as of December 31, 20152018).


The postretirement health and life costs that are reported as a component within the Consolidated Balance Sheet, reflected in regulatory long-term assets or liabilities and accumulated other comprehensive income, consist of the following:
Unrecognized Postretirement Health and Life Costs
As of December 312019
2018
Millions  
Net Loss$16.0$25.0
Prior Service Credit(36.3)(4.6)
Total Unrecognized Postretirement Health and Life Cost$(20.3)$20.4
Unrecognized Postretirement Health and Life Costs
As of December 312016
2015
Millions  
Net Loss$19.8$6.5
Prior Service Credit(4.7)(7.6)
Total Unrecognized Postretirement Health and Life Cost (Credit)$15.1$(1.1)
Components of Net Periodic Postretirement Health and Life Expense
Year Ended December 312016
2015
2014
Millions   
Service Cost
$3.9

$4.3

$3.4
Interest Cost7.4
7.2
7.3
Expected Return on Plan Assets(11.2)(10.9)(10.3)
Amortization of Loss0.2
0.4
0.5
Amortization of Prior Service Credit(2.9)(3.0)(2.5)
Net Postretirement Health and Life Credit$(2.6)$(2.0)$(1.6)




NOTE 15.12. PENSION AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS (Continued)
Other Changes in Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets and Benefit Obligations
Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income and Regulatory Assets or Liabilities
Year Ended December 312016
2015
Millions 
 
Net Loss
$13.5

Amortization of Prior Service Credit2.9

$3.0
Amortization of Loss(0.2)(0.4)
Total Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income and Regulatory Assets or Liabilities$16.2$2.6
Reconciliation of Net Postretirement Health and Life Amounts Recognized in Consolidated Balance Sheet
As of December 312019
2018
Millions  
Net Loss (a)
$(16.0)$(25.0)
Prior Service Credit36.3
4.6
Accumulated Net Periodic Benefit Cost in Excess of Contributions (a)
3.6
(1.3)
Total Net Postretirement Health and Life Amounts Recognized in Consolidated Balance Sheet$23.9$(21.7)
(a)Excludes gains, losses and contributions associated with irrevocable grantor trusts.
Components of Net Periodic Postretirement Health and Life Cost
Year Ended December 312019
2018
2017
Millions   
Service Cost
$3.9

$4.7

$4.4
Non-Service Cost Components (a)
   
Interest Cost7.3
7.1
7.7
Expected Return on Plan Assets(10.5)(10.9)(10.5)
Amortization of Loss0.5
0.8
0.3
Amortization of Prior Service Credit(2.8)(2.1)(2.0)
Effect of Plan Curtailment(2.1)

Net Postretirement Health and Life Credit$(3.7)$(0.4)$(0.1)

(a)These components of net periodic postretirement health and life cost are included in the line item “Other” under Other Income (Expense) on the Consolidated Statement of Income.
Other Changes in Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets and Benefit Obligations
Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income and Regulatory Assets or Liabilities
Year Ended December 312019
2018
Millions 
 
Net (Gain) Loss$(10.6)
$4.7
Prior Service Credit Arising During the Period(34.6)(2.1)
Amortization of Prior Service Credit2.8
2.1
Amortization of Loss(0.5)(0.8)
Total Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income and Regulatory Assets or Liabilities$(42.9)$3.9

Estimated Future Benefit Payments    PensionPostretirement Health and Life
Millions  
2020
$51.2

$8.6
2021
$50.7

$8.4
2022
$50.1

$8.2
2023
$49.8

$8.0
2024
$49.6

$8.0
Years 2025 – 2029
$239.3

$40.1

Estimated Future Benefit Payments    PensionPostretirement Health and Life
Millions 
 
2017
$45.0

$9.3
2018
$45.2

$9.4
2019
$45.4

$9.7
2020
$45.5

$9.9
2021
$45.8

$10.0
Years 2022 – 2026
$231.0

$51.4



NOTE 12. PENSION AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS (Continued)

The pension and postretirement health and life costs recorded in regulatory long-term assets or liabilities and accumulated other comprehensive income expected to be recognized as a component of net pension and postretirement benefit costs for the year ending December 31, 2017,2020, are as follows:
       Pension
Postretirement
Health and Life
Millions  
Net Loss$12.8$1.0
Prior Service Credit(0.2)(8.0)
Total Pension and Postretirement Health and Life Cost (Credit)$12.6$(7.0)
       Pension
Postretirement
Health and Life
Millions  
Net Loss$9.9$0.3
Prior Service Credit
(2.0)
Total Pension and Postretirement Health and Life Cost (Credit)$9.9$(1.7)

Assumptions Used to Determine Benefit Obligation
As of December 3120192018
Discount Rate  
Pension3.34 - 3.47%4.39 - 4.53%
Postretirement Health and Life3.45%4.47%
Rate of Compensation Increase3.70 - 4.10%3.70 - 4.10%
Health Care Trend Rates  
Trend Rate5.00 - 6.20%5.00 - 6.46%
Ultimate Trend Rate4.50%4.50%
Year Ultimate Trend Rate Effective20382038
Assumptions Used to Determine Benefit Obligation
As of December 3120162015
Discount Rate  
Pension4.53%4.72%
Postretirement Health and Life4.57%4.73%
Rate of Compensation Increase3.70 - 4.30%3.70 - 4.30%
Health Care Trend Rates  
Trend Rate5.00 - 7.00%6.50%
Ultimate Trend Rate4.50%5.00%
Year Ultimate Trend Rate Effective20382022


NOTE 15. PENSION AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS (Continued)
Assumptions Used to Determine Net Periodic Benefit Costs
Year Ended December 31201920182017
Discount Rate4.39 - 4.53%3.81 - 3.96%4.53 - 4.57%
Expected Long-Term Return on Plan Assets (a)
   
Pension7.25%7.50%7.50%
Postretirement Health and Life5.80 - 7.25%6.00 - 7.50%6.00 - 7.50%
Rate of Compensation Increase3.70 - 4.10%3.70 - 4.10%3.70 - 4.30%
Assumptions Used to Determine Net Periodic Benefit Costs
Year Ended December 31201620152014
Discount Rate4.72 - 4.73%4.30 - 4.33%4.93 - 4.96%
Expected Long-Term Return on Plan Assets (a)
   
Pension8.00%8.00%8.00%
Postretirement Health and Life6.40 - 8.00%6.40 - 8.00%6.40 - 8.00%
Rate of Compensation Increase3.70 - 4.30%3.70 - 4.30%3.70 - 4.30%

(a)The expected long-term rates of return used to determine net periodic benefit expense for 20172020 have been reduced to 7.506.75 percent for pension expense and 6.005.40 percent to 7.506.75 percent for postretirement health and life expense.


In establishing the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets, we determine the long-term historical performance of each asset class, adjust these for current economic conditions, and utilizing the target allocation of our plan assets, forecast the expected long-term rate of return.


The discount rate is computed using a bond matching study which utilizes a portfolio of high quality bonds that produce cash flows similar to the projected costs of our pension and other postretirement plans.


The Company utilizes actuarial assumptions about mortality to calculate the pension and postretirement health and life benefit obligations. In 2014, revisedThe mortality tables were released,assumptions used to calculate our pension and the Company adopted updated mortality tablesother postretirement benefit obligations as of December 31, 2014.2019, considered a modified PRI-2012 mortality table and mortality projection scale.
Sensitivity of a One Percent Change in Health Care Trend Rates
 
One Percent
Increase
One Percent
Decrease
Millions  
Effect on Total of Postretirement Health and Life Service and Interest Cost
$1.8
$(1.4)
Effect on Postretirement Health and Life Obligation
$16.5
$(13.6)



NOTE 12. PENSION AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS (Continued)
Sensitivity of a One Percent Change in Health Care Trend Rates
 
One Percent
Increase
One Percent
Decrease
Millions  
Effect on Total of Postretirement Health and Life Service and Interest Cost
$20.1
$(16.7)
Effect on Postretirement Health and Life Obligation
$1.8
$(1.4)
Actual Plan Asset AllocationsPension
Postretirement
Health and Life (a)
Pension
Postretirement
Health and Life (a)
20162015201620152019201820192018
Equity Securities49%47%60%57%34%32%66%62%
Debt Securities39%39%34%35%
Fixed Income Securities62%60%33%34%
Private Equity7%8%6%8%1%5%1%4%
Real Estate5%6%

3%3%

100%100%100%100%100%100%100%100%
(a)Includes VEBAs and irrevocable grantor trusts.


There were no0 shares of ALLETE common stock included in pension plan equity securities as of December 31, 2016 (no2019 (0 shares as of December 31, 2015)2018). On January 17, 2017, we contributed approximately 0.2 million shares of ALLETE common stock to our pension plan, which had an aggregate value of $13.5 million when contributed.


In 2013, theThe defined benefit pension planplans have adopted a dynamic asset allocation strategy (glide path) that increases the invested allocation to fixed income assets as the funding level of the plan increases to better match the sensitivity of the plan’s assets and liabilities to changes in interest rates. This is expected to reduce the volatility of reported pension plan expenses. The postretirement health and life plans’ assets continue to beare diversified to achieve strong returns within managed risk. Equity securities are diversified among domestic companies with large, mid and small market capitalizations, as well as investments in international companies. The majority of debt securities are made up of investment grade bonds.



NOTE 15. PENSION AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS (Continued)


Following are the current targeted allocations as of December 31, 2016:2019:
Plan Asset Target Allocations    Pension
Postretirement
Health and Life (a)
    Pension
Postretirement
Health and Life (a)
Equity Securities56%60%32%60%
Debt Securities35%37%
Fixed Income Securities56%37%
Private Equity6%
Real Estate9%3%6%3%
100%100%100%100%
(a)Includes VEBAs and irrevocable grantor trusts.


Fair Value


Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (exit price). We utilize market data or assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and the risks inherent in the inputs to the valuation technique. These inputs can be readily observable, market corroborated, or generally unobservable. We primarily apply the market approach for recurring fair value measurements and endeavor to utilize the best available information. Accordingly, we utilize valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. These inputs, which are used to measure fair value, are prioritized through the fair value hierarchy. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurement) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurement). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:(See Note 7. Fair Value)


Level 1 — Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reported date. Active markets are those in which transactions for the asset or liability occur in sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis. This category includes various U.S. equity securities, public mutual funds, and futures. These instruments are valued using the closing price from the applicable exchange or whose value is quoted and readily traded daily.

Level 2 — Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets, but are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reported date. The types of assets and liabilities included in Level 2 are typically either comparable to actively traded securities or contracts, such as treasury securities with pricing interpolated from recent trades of similar securities, or priced with models using highly observable inputs. This category includes various bonds and non-public funds whose underlying investments may be Level 1 or Level 2 securities.

Level 3 — Significant inputs that are generally less observable from objective sources. The types of assets and liabilities included in Level 3 are those with inputs requiring significant management judgment or estimation, such as the complex and subjective models and forecasts used to determine the fair value. This category includes private equity funds and real estate valued through external appraisal processes. Valuation methodologies incorporate pricing models, discounted cash flow models, and similar techniques which utilize capitalization rates, discount rates, cash flows and other factors.



NOTE 15.12. PENSION AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS (Continued)
Fair Value (Continued)


Pension Fair Value
Fair Value as of December 31, 2016Fair Value as of December 31, 2019
Recurring Fair Value MeasuresLevel 1Level 2Level 3TotalLevel 1Level 2Level 3Total
Millions  
Assets:  
Equity Securities:  
U.S. Large-cap (a)

$94.6



$94.6


$78.5


$78.5
U.S. Mid-cap Growth (a)


$44.8

44.8

35.9

35.9
U.S. Small-cap (a)

45.0

45.0

34.6

34.6
International46.7
42.3

89.0

92.1

92.1
Debt Securities: 
 
 
 
Fixed Income
200.1

200.1
Fixed Income Securities (a)

425.4

425.4
Cash and Cash Equivalents17.8


17.8

$7.1


7.1
Private Equity Funds


$40.6
40.6



$8.0
8.0
Real Estate

25.6
25.6


18.0
18.0
Total Fair Value of Assets
$159.1

$332.2

$66.2

$557.5

$7.1

$666.5

$26.0

$699.6
(a)
The underlying investments classified under U.S. Equity Securities consist of money market funds (Level 1), mutual funds (Level 1) and actively-managed funds (Level 2), which are combined with futures, and settle daily,managed to achieve the returns of thecertain U.S. Equity Securities Mid-cap Growthequity and Small-cap funds. Our exposure with respect to these investments includes both the futures and the underlying investments.
fixed income securities indexes.
Recurring Fair Value Measures  
Activity in Level 3Private Equity Funds    Real Estate
Millions  
Balance as of December 31, 2018
$27.8

$20.8
Actual Return on Plan Assets0.4
(1.3)
Purchases, Sales, and Settlements – Net(20.2)(1.5)
Balance as of December 31, 2019
$8.0

$18.0

Recurring Fair Value Measures  
Activity in Level 3Private Equity Funds    Real Estate
Millions  
Balance as of December 31, 2015
$43.3

$28.9
Actual Return on Plan Assets5.0
2.3
Purchases, Sales, and Settlements – Net(7.7)(5.6)
Balance as of December 31, 2016
$40.6

$25.6
 Fair Value as of December 31, 2018
Recurring Fair Value MeasuresLevel 1Level 2Level 3Total
Millions    
Assets:    
Equity Securities:    
U.S. Large-cap (a)


$59.1


$59.1
U.S. Mid-cap Growth (a)

28.1

28.1
U.S. Small-cap (a)

27.2

27.2
International
75.8

75.8
Fixed Income Securities (a)

352.9

352.9
Cash and Cash Equivalents
$6.3


6.3
Private Equity Funds


$27.8
27.8
Real Estate

20.8
20.8
Total Fair Value of Assets
$6.3

$543.1

$48.6

$598.0
(a)The underlying investments consist of actively-managed funds managed to achieve the returns of certain U.S. equity and fixed income securities indexes.




NOTE 15.12. PENSION AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS (Continued)
Pension Fair Value (Continued)
Recurring Fair Value Measures   
Activity in Level 3 Private Equity Funds   Real Estate
Millions   
Balance as of December 31, 2017 
$33.2

$25.5
Actual Return on Plan Assets 2.8
0.7
Purchases, Sales, and Settlements – Net (8.2)(5.4)
Balance as of December 31, 2018 
$27.8

$20.8

 Fair Value as of December 31, 2015
Recurring Fair Value MeasuresLevel 1Level 2Level 3Total
Millions    
Assets:    
Equity Securities:    
U.S. Large-cap (a)

$33.9

$42.1


$76.0
U.S. Mid-cap Growth (a)
14.2
17.7

31.9
U.S. Small-cap (a)
14.5
17.9

32.4
Mutual Funds8.4


8.4
International44.7
42.0

86.7
Debt Securities: 
 
 
 
Mutual Funds0.1


0.1
Fixed Income2.7
185.3

188.0
Cash and Cash Equivalents25.6


25.6
Private Equity Funds


$43.3
43.3
Real Estate

28.9
28.9
Total Fair Value of Assets
$144.1

$305.0

$72.2

$521.3
(a)
The underlying investments classified under U.S. Equity Securities consist of money market funds (Level 1) and actively-managed funds (Level 2), which are combined with futures, and settle daily, to achieve the returns of the U.S. Equity Securities Large-cap, Mid-cap Growth, and Small-cap funds. Our exposure with respect to these investments includes both the futures and the underlying investments.
Recurring Fair Value Measures   
Activity in Level 3 Private Equity Funds   Real Estate
Millions   
Balance as of December 31, 2014 
$43.3

$28.9
Actual Return on Plan Assets 2.6
2.9
Purchases, Sales, and Settlements – Net (2.6)(2.9)
Balance as of December 31, 2015 
$43.3

$28.9



NOTE 15. PENSION AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS (Continued)


Postretirement Health and Life Fair Value
 Fair Value as of December 31, 2019
Recurring Fair Value MeasuresLevel 1Level 2Level 3Total
Millions    
Assets:    
Equity Securities: (a)
    
U.S. Large-cap
$33.6



$33.6
U.S. Mid-cap Growth27.7


27.7
U.S. Small-cap14.3


14.3
International37.8


37.8
Fixed Income Securities: 
 
 
 
Mutual Funds53.4


53.4
Debt Securities

$4.1

4.1
Cash and Cash Equivalents1.1


1.1
Private Equity Funds


$1.7
1.7
Total Fair Value of Assets
$167.9

$4.1

$1.7

$173.7
 Fair Value as of December 31, 2016
Recurring Fair Value MeasuresLevel 1Level 2Level 3Total
Millions    
Assets:    
Equity Securities:    
U.S. Large-cap (a)

$27.9



$27.9
U.S. Mid-cap Growth (a)
20.7


20.7
U.S. Small-cap (a)
14.0


14.0
International27.9


27.9
Debt Securities: 
 
 
 
Mutual Funds48.6


48.6
Fixed Income

$4.6

4.6
Cash and Cash Equivalents1.1


1.1
Private Equity Funds


$9.5
9.5
Total Fair Value of Assets
$140.2

$4.6

$9.5

$154.3

(a)
The underlying investments classified under U.S. Equity Securities consist of mutual funds (Level 1).
Recurring Fair Value Measures 
Activity in Level 3Private Equity Funds
Millions 
Balance as of December 31, 20152018

$12.06.5

Actual Return on Plan Assets1.40.7

Purchases, Sales, and Settlements – Net(3.95.5)
Balance as of December 31, 20162019

$9.51.7

 Fair Value as of December 31, 2015
Recurring Fair Value MeasuresLevel 1Level 2Level 3Total
Millions    
Assets:    
Equity Securities:    
U.S. Large-cap (a)

$28.2



$28.2
U.S. Mid-cap Growth (a)
19.1


19.1
U.S. Small-cap (a)
12.1


12.1
International26.8


26.8
Debt Securities: 
 
 
 
Mutual Funds45.2


45.2
Fixed Income

$8.4

8.4
Cash and Cash Equivalents1.6


1.6
Private Equity Funds


$12.0
12.0
Total Fair Value of Assets
$133.0

$8.4

$12.0

$153.4
(a)
The underlying investments classified under U.S. Equity Securities consist of mutual funds (Level 1).





NOTE 15.12. PENSION AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS (Continued)
Postretirement Health and Life Fair Value (Continued)
 Fair Value as of December 31, 2018
Recurring Fair Value MeasuresLevel 1Level 2Level 3Total
Millions    
Assets:    
Equity Securities: (a)
    
U.S. Large-cap
$29.1



$29.1
U.S. Mid-cap Growth21.2


21.2
U.S. Small-cap12.9


12.9
International30.4


30.4
Fixed Income Securities: 
 
 
 
Mutual Funds49.6


49.6
Debt Securities

$4.0

4.0
Cash and Cash Equivalents0.6


0.6
Private Equity Funds


$6.5
6.5
Total Fair Value of Assets
$143.8

$4.0

$6.5

$154.3

(a)
The underlying investments consist of mutual funds (Level 1).
Recurring Fair Value Measures 
Activity in Level 3Private Equity Funds
Millions 
Balance as of December 31, 20142017

$12.98.2

Actual Return on Plan Assets1.20.9

Purchases, Sales, and Settlements – Net(2.12.6)
Balance as of December 31, 20152018

$12.06.5




Accounting and disclosure requirements for the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (Act) provide guidance for employers that sponsor postretirement health care plans that provide prescription drug benefits. We provide a fully insured postretirement health benefit, including a prescription drug benefit, which qualifies us for a federal subsidy under the Act. The federal subsidy is reflected in the premiums charged to us by the insurance company.




NOTE 16.13. EMPLOYEE STOCK AND INCENTIVE PLANS


Employee Stock Ownership Plan. We sponsor an ESOP within the RSOP. Eligible employees may contribute to the RSOP plan as of their date of hire.In 1990, the ESOP issued a $75.0 million note (term not to exceed 25 years at 10.25 percent) to use as consideration for 2.8 million shares (1.9 million shares adjusted for stock splits) of our common stock. The note was refinanced in 2006 at 6 percent and subsequently matured in December 2015. The ESOP shares were initially pledged as collateral for the debt. As the debt was repaid, shares were released from collateral and allocated to participants based on the proportion of debt service paid in the year. As shares were released from collateral, we reported compensation expense equal to the current market price of the shares less dividends on allocated shares. The dividends received by the ESOP are distributed to participants. Dividends on allocated ESOP shares are recorded as a reduction of retained earnings. With the maturity of the note, ESOP employer allocations will beare funded with contributions paid in either cash or the issuance of ALLETE common stock at the Company’s discretion. We record compensation expense equal to the cash or current market price of stock contributed. ESOP compensation expense was $9.2$10.8 million in 20162019 ($9.011.4 million in 20152018; $9.111.0 million in 20142017).


According to the accounting standards for stock compensation, unallocated shares of ALLETE common stock held and purchased by the ESOP were treated as unearned ESOP shares and not considered outstanding for earnings per share computations. All ESOP shares are included in earnings per share computations after they arehave been allocated to participants.participants as of December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017.

As of December 312016
2015
2014
Millions   
ESOP Shares   
Allocated1.6
1.8
1.9
Unallocated

0.3
Total1.6
1.8
2.2
Fair Value of Unallocated Shares


$13.2

Stock-Based Compensation.

Stock Incentive Plan. Under our Executive Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan (Executive Plan), share-based awards may be issued to key employees through a broad range of methods, including non-qualified and incentive stock options, performance shares, performance units, restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights and other awards. There are 1.00.8 million shares of ALLETE common stock reserved for issuance under the Executive Plan, with 0.8of which 0.7 million of these shares remain available for issuance as of December 31, 20162019.




NOTE 16.13. EMPLOYEE STOCK AND INCENTIVE PLANS (Continued)
Stock BasedStock-Based Compensation (Continued)


We currently have theThe following types of share-based awards outstanding:were outstanding in 2019, 2018 or 2017:


Non-Qualified Stock Options. These options allow for the purchase of shares of common stock at a price equal to the market value of our common stock at the date of grant. Options become exercisable beginning one year after the grant date, with one-third vesting each year over three years. Options may be exercised up to ten years following the date of grant. In the case of qualified retirement, death or disability, options vest immediately and the period over which the options can be exercised is three years. Employees have up to three months to exercise vested options upon voluntary termination or involuntary termination without cause. All options are canceled upon termination for cause. All options vest immediately upon retirement, death, disability or a change of control, as defined in the award agreement. We determine the fair value of options using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The estimated fair value of options, including the effect of estimated forfeitures, is recognized as expense on the straight-line basis over the options’ vesting periods, or the accelerated vesting period if the employee is eligible for retirement. Stock options have not been granted since 2008.

The risk-free interest rate for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the grant date. Expected volatility is estimated based on the historic volatility of our stock and the stock of our peer group companies. We utilize historical option exercise and employee pre-vesting termination data to estimate the option life. The dividend growth rate is based upon historical growth rates in our dividends.

Performance Shares. Under the performance share awards, plan, the number of shares earned is contingent upon attaining specific market and performance goals over a three-year performance period. Market goals are measured by total shareholder return relative to a group of peer companies.companies while performance goals are measured by earnings per share growth. In the case of qualified retirement, death, or disability during a performance period, a pro rata portion of the award will be earned at the conclusion of the performance period based on the market goals achieved. In the case of termination of employment for any reason other than qualified retirement, death, or disability, no award will be earned. If there is a change in control, a pro rata portion of the award will be paid based on the greater of actual performance up to the date of the change in control or target performance. The fair value of these awards is determined byincorporates the probability of meeting the total shareholder return goals. Compensation cost is recognized over the three-yearthree-year performance period based on our estimate of the number of shares which will be earned by the award recipients.


Restricted Stock Units. Under the restricted stock units plan,unit awards, shares for participants eligible for retirement vest monthly over a three-yearthree-year period. For participants not eligible for retirement, shares vest at the end of the three-year period. In the case of qualified retirement, death or disability, a pro rata portion of the award will be earned. In the case of termination of employment for any reason other than qualified retirement, death or disability, no award will be earned. If there is a change in control, a pro rata portion of the award will be earned. The fair value of these awards is equal to the grant date fair value. Compensation cost is recognized over the three-year vesting period based on our estimate of the number of shares which will be earned by the award recipients.


Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP). Under our ESPP, eligible employees may purchase ALLETE common stock at a 5 percent discount from the market price. Because the discount is not greater than 5 percent,price; we are not required to apply fair value accounting to these awards.awards as the discount is not greater than 5 percent.


RSOP. The RSOP is a contributory defined contribution plan subject to the provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, and qualifies as an employee stock ownership plan and profit sharing plan. The RSOP provides eligible employees an opportunity to save for retirement.


The following share-based compensation expense amounts were recognized in our Consolidated Statement of Income for the periods presented.
Share-Based Compensation Expense
Year Ended December 312019
2018
2017
Millions   
Performance Shares
$2.3

$2.3

$2.1
Restricted Stock Units0.8
0.9
1.0
Total Share-Based Compensation Expense
$3.1

$3.2

$3.1
Income Tax Benefit
$0.9

$0.9

$0.9

Share-Based Compensation Expense
Year Ended December 312016
2015
2014
Millions   
Performance Shares
$1.8

$1.8

$1.6
Restricted Stock Units0.8
0.8
0.7
Total Share-Based Compensation Expense
$2.6

$2.6

$2.3
Income Tax Benefit
$1.1

$1.1

$1.0



NOTE 16. EMPLOYEE STOCK AND INCENTIVE PLANS (Continued)
Stock Based Compensation (Continued)

There were no0 capitalized share-based compensation costs during the years ended December 31, 20162019, 20152018 or 20142017.


As of December 31, 20162019, the total unrecognized compensation cost for the performance share awards and restricted stock units not yet recognized in our Consolidated StatementsStatement of Income was $2.3$2.2 million and $1.0$0.9 million, respectively. These amounts are expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.7 years for performance share awards and 1.6 years for restricted stock units.years.


Non-Qualified Stock Options. The following table presents information regarding our outstanding stock options.
NOTE 13. EMPLOYEE STOCK AND INCENTIVE PLANS (Continued)
 201620152014
 
Number of
Options
Weighted-Average
Exercise
Price
Number of
Options
Weighted-Average
Exercise
Price
Number of
Options
Weighted-Average
Exercise
Price
Outstanding as of January 139,654

$44.39
66,279

$44.39
108,299

$44.10
Granted (a)






Exercised(35,297)
$44.89
(24,456)
$44.52
(42,020)
$43.65
Forfeited

(2,169)$42.93

Outstanding as of December 314,357

$40.29
39,654

$44.39
66,279

$44.39
Exercisable as of December 314,357

$40.29
39,654

$44.39
66,279

$44.39
(a)
Stock options have not been granted since 2008. The weighted-average grant-date intrinsic value of options granted in 2008 was $6.18.

Stock-Based Compensation (Continued)
Cash received from non-qualified stock options exercised was $1.6 million in 2016. The intrinsic value of a stock award is the amount by which the fair value of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price of the award. The total intrinsic value of options exercised was $0.5 million during 2016 ($0.2 million in 2015; $0.4 million in 2014).
 Exercise Price
As of December 31, 2016$39.10$48.65
Options Outstanding and Exercisable:  
Number Outstanding and Exercisable3,816
541
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)1.1
0.1
Weighted Average Exercise Price
$39.10

$48.65
Aggregate Intrinsic Value (Millions)
$0.1


Performance Shares. The following table presents information regarding our non-vested performance shares.
201620152014201920182017
Number of
Shares
Weighted-
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Number of
Shares
Weighted-
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Number of
Shares
Weighted-
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Number of
Shares
Weighted-
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Number of
Shares
Weighted-
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Number of
Shares
Weighted-
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Non-vested as of January 1119,540

$52.72
119,635

$48.26
114,765

$47.02
129,693

$66.12
127,898

$58.23
127,580

$52.56
Granted (a)
57,189

$52.43
43,583

$58.95
47,992

$46.47
60,747

$63.89
66,557

$76.42
50,729

$62.90
Awarded



(36,515)
$42.01
(75,943)$53.44(58,293)
$59.82


Unearned Grant Award(42,126)
$52.70
(36,670)
$45.41






(40,801)
$46.27
Forfeited(7,023)
$53.45
(7,008)
$53.49
(6,607)
$48.29
(14,912)
$77.14
(6,469)
$72.99
(9,610)
$58.29
Non-vested as of December 31127,580

$52.56
119,540

$52.72
119,635

$48.26
99,585

$72.78
129,693

$66.12
127,898

$58.23
(a)    Shares granted include accrued dividends.



NOTE 16. EMPLOYEE STOCK AND INCENTIVE PLANS (Continued)
Stock Based Compensation (Continued)

There were 41,755approximately 22,000 performance shares granted in January 20172020 for the three-yearthree-year performance period ending in 2019.2022. The ultimate issuance is contingent upon the attainment of certain goals of ALLETE during the performance periods. The grant date fair value of the performance shares granted was $2.6$1.8 million. There were noapproximately 25,000 performance shares awarded in February 2017 for2020. The grant date fair value of the three-year performance period ending in 2016.shares awarded was $1.6 million.


Restricted Stock Units. The following table presents information regarding our available restricted stock units.
201620152014201920182017
Number of
Shares
Weighted- Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Number of
Shares
Weighted- Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Number of
Shares
Weighted- Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Number of
Shares
Weighted- Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Number of
Shares
Weighted- Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Number of
Shares
Weighted- Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Available as of January 157,694

$49.86
53,888

$44.47
55,982

$40.85
49,771

$60.74
55,248

$56.18
54,728

$51.79
Granted (a)
20,351

$50.25
26,702

$54.81
19,645

$48.44
13,927

$74.93
16,573

$71.11
21,241

$62.20
Awarded(19,661)
$44.33
(19,464)
$41.44
(18,860)
$37.64
(21,110)
$52.44
(18,881)
$55.78
(17,281)
$49.72
Forfeited(3,656)
$52.87
(3,432)
$51.52
(2,879)
$45.92
(2,645)
$72.43
(3,169)
$64.92
(3,440)
$56.00
Available as of December 3154,728

$51.79
57,694

$49.86
53,888

$44.47
39,943

$69.30
49,771

$60.74
55,248

$56.18
(a)    Shares granted include accrued dividends.


There were 17,639approximately 14,000 restricted stock units granted in January 20172020 for the vesting period ending in 2019.2022. The grant date fair value of the restricted stock units granted was $1.1 million. There were 14,794approximately 15,000 restricted stock units awarded in February 2017.2020. The grant date fair value of the shares awarded was $0.7$0.9 million.




NOTE 17.14. BUSINESS SEGMENTS


We present three reportable segments: Regulated Operations, ALLETE Clean Energy, and U.S. Water Services. We measure performance of our operations through budgeting and monitoring of contributions to consolidated net income by each business segment.


Regulated Operations includes three3 operating segments which consist of our regulated utilities, Minnesota Power and SWL&P, as well as our investment in ATC, a Wisconsin-based regulated utility that owns and maintains electric transmission assets in parts of Wisconsin, Michigan, Minnesota and Illinois.ATC. ALLETE Clean Energy is our business focused on developing, acquiring and operating clean and renewable energy projects. U.S. Water Services iswas our integrated water management company, which was acquired in February 2015. The ALLETE Clean Energy and U.S. Water Services reportable segments comprise our Energy Infrastructure and Related Services businesses.reflects operating results until the date of its sale on March 26, 2019. We also present Corporate and Other which includes two2 operating segments, BNI Energy, our coal mining operations in North Dakota, and ALLETE Properties, our legacy Florida real estate investment, along with our investment in Nobles 2, other business development and corporate expenditures, unallocated interest expense, a small amount of non-rate base generation, approximately 5,0004,000 acres of land in Minnesota, and earnings on cash and investments.





NOTE 17.14. BUSINESS SEGMENTS (Continued)
Year Ended December 312019
2018
2017
Millions   
Operating Revenue   
Residential
$139.6

$139.7

$127.4
Commercial145.7
147.9
139.8
Municipal48.6
54.9
57.9
Industrial476.4
469.5
470.5
Other Power Suppliers153.7
170.3
161.8
CIP Financial Incentive2.8
3.0
5.5
Other75.6
74.2
100.9
Total Regulated Operations1,042.4
1,059.5
1,063.8
    
ALLETE Clean Energy   
Long-term PSA48.0
55.2
56.9
Sale of Wind Energy Facility
81.1

Other11.6
23.6
23.6
Total ALLETE Clean Energy59.6
159.9
80.5
    
U.S. Water Services (e)
   
Point-in-time19.0
100.3
95.8
Contract9.2
38.3
36.2
Capital Project5.2
33.5
19.8
Total U.S. Water Services33.4
172.1
151.8
    
Corporate and Other   
Long-term Contract82.8
85.5
89.3
Other22.321.6
33.9
Total Corporate and Other105.1107.1123.2
Total Operating Revenue
$1,240.5

$1,498.6

$1,419.3
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to ALLETE (a)(b)
   
Regulated Operations$154.4$131.0$128.4
    
ALLETE Clean Energy (c)
12.4
33.7
41.5
U.S. Water Services(1.1)3.2
10.7
    
Corporate and Other (d)(e)
19.9
6.2
(8.4)
Total Net Income Attributable to ALLETE$185.6$174.1$172.2

Year Ended December 312016
2015
2014
Millions   
Operating Revenue   
Regulated Operations
$1,000.7

$991.2

$1,003.5
    
Energy Infrastructure and Related Services   
ALLETE Clean Energy (a)
80.5
262.1
33.2
U.S. Water Services137.5
119.8

    
Corporate and Other121.0
113.3
100.1
Total Operating Revenue
$1,339.7

$1,486.4

$1,136.8
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to ALLETE   
Regulated Operations (b)

$135.5

$131.6

$123.0
    
Energy Infrastructure and Related Services   
ALLETE Clean Energy13.4
29.9
3.3
U.S. Water Services1.5
0.9

    
Corporate and Other (b)
4.9
(21.3)(1.5)
Total Net Income Attributable to ALLETE
$155.3

$141.1

$124.8
Depreciation and Amortization   
Regulated Operations
$154.3

$135.1

$118.0
    
Energy Infrastructure and Related Services   
ALLETE Clean Energy22.3
18.7
10.1
U.S. Water Services8.9
7.3

    
Corporate and Other10.3
8.9
7.6
Total Depreciation and Amortization
$195.8

$170.0

$135.7
Operating Expenses – Other (c)
   
ALLETE Clean Energy$3.3

Corporate and Other(13.6)$36.3
Total Operating Expenses – Other$(10.3)$36.3
Interest Expense   
Regulated Operations (b)
$52.1$53.9$49.2
    
Energy Infrastructure and Related Services   
ALLETE Clean Energy5.8
3.3
0.8
U.S. Water Services1.7
1.4

    
Corporate and Other (b)
14.5
8.6
7.1
    
Eliminations (b)
(3.8)(2.3)(2.3)
Total Interest Expense$70.3$64.9$54.8
Equity Earnings in ATC   
Regulated Operations$18.5$16.3$19.6
(a) Net income in 2017 included a favorable impact of $13.0 million after-tax due to the remeasurement of deferred income tax assets and liabilities resulting from the TCJA, which consisted of a $23.6 million after-tax benefit for ALLETE Clean Energy, a $9.2 million after-tax benefit for U.S. Water Services and a $19.8 million after-tax expense for Corporate and Other. The TCJA did not have an impact on net income for our Regulated Operations as the remeasurement of deferred income tax assets and liabilities primarily resulted in the recording of regulatory assets and liabilities. (See Note 1. Operations and Significant Accounting Policies and Note 4. Regulatory Matters.)
(a)Includes the construction and sale of a wind energy facility by ALLETE Clean Energy to Montana-Dakota Utilities for $197.7 million in 2015.
(b)During 2015, anIncludes interest expense resulting from intercompany loan agreement was entered intoagreements and interest expense was allocated to certain subsidiaries. The amounts are eliminated in consolidation. 
(c)Net income in 2018 includes the recognition of profit for the sale of a wind energy facility to Montana-Dakota Utilities. 
(d)Net income in 2017 included a $7.9 million after-tax favorable impact for the regulatory outcome of the MPUC’s modification of its November 2016 order on the allocation of North Dakota investment tax credits. 
(e) On March 26, 2019, ALLETE sold U.S. Water Services. The Company recognized a gain on the sale of $13.2 million after-tax which is reflected in Corporate and Other. (See Note 1. Operations and Significant Accounting Policies.)




NOTE 14. BUSINESS SEGMENTS (Continued)
Year Ended December 312019
2018
2017
Millions   
Depreciation and Amortization   
Regulated Operations
$159.4

$158.0

$132.6
    
ALLETE Clean Energy26.8
24.4
23.4
U.S. Water Services2.3
10.2
9.8
    
Corporate and Other13.5
13.0
11.7
Total Depreciation and Amortization
$202.0

$205.6

$177.5
Operating Expenses – Other (a)
   
Corporate and Other
$(2.0)$(0.7)
Total Operating Expenses – Other
$(2.0)$(0.7)
Interest Expense (b)
   
Regulated Operations
$58.9

$60.2

$57.0
    
ALLETE Clean Energy2.8
3.6
4.2
U.S. Water Services0.2
1.5
1.6
    
Corporate and Other8.0
7.3
10.3
    
Eliminations(5.0)(4.7)(5.3)
Total Interest Expense
$64.9

$67.9

$67.8
Equity Earnings   
Regulated Operations
$21.7

$17.5

$22.5
Income Tax Expense (Benefit) (c)
   
Regulated Operations (d)
$(7.1)$(15.5)
$27.2
    
ALLETE Clean Energy(11.9)(1.0)(14.2)
U.S. Water Services(0.4)1.0
(7.8)
    
Corporate and Other (d)(e)
12.8

9.5
Total Income Tax Expense (Benefit)$(6.6)$(15.5)
$14.7

(a)See Note 1. Operations and Significant Accounting Policies.



NOTE 17. BUSINESS SEGMENTS (Continued)
Year Ended December 312016
2015
2014
Millions   
Income Tax Expense (Benefit)   
Regulated Operations
$5.9

$24.4

$39.0
    
Energy Infrastructure and Related Services   
ALLETE Clean Energy8.1
21.0
2.3
U.S. Water Services1.4
0.9

    
Corporate and Other4.4
(21.0)(4.6)
Total Income Tax Expense
$19.8

$25.3

$36.7
As of December 312016
2015
Millions  
Assets  
Regulated Operations (a)
$3,853.4$3,853.1
   
Energy Infrastructure and Related Services  
ALLETE Clean Energy (a)
566.0
501.5
U.S. Water Services264.1
258.3
   
Corporate and Other222.9
281.6
Total Assets (a)

$4,906.4

$4,894.5
Capital Expenditures  
Regulated Operations$121.8$224.4
   
Energy Infrastructure and Related Services  
ALLETE Clean Energy106.9
8.6
U.S. Water Services3.7
2.9
   
Corporate and Other15.4
15.9
Total Capital Expenditures
$247.8

$251.8
(a)(b)As a resultIncludes interest expense resulting from intercompany loan agreements and allocated to certain subsidiaries. The amounts are eliminated in consolidation.    
(c)Income tax expense in 2017 included an income tax benefit of revised accounting guidance adopted$13.0 million due to the remeasurement of deferred income tax assets and liabilities resulting from the TCJA, which consisted of income tax benefits of $23.6 million for ALLETE Clean Energy and $9.2 million for U.S. Water Services as well as additional income tax expense of $19.8 million for Corporate and Other. The TCJA did not have an impact on income tax expense for our Regulated Operations as the remeasurement of deferred income tax assets and liabilities primarily resulted in the first quarterrecording of 2016, we reclassified unamortized debt issuance costs from Other Non-Current Assets to Long-Term Debt on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Prior period segmentregulatory assets have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation.and liabilities. (See Note 1. Operations and Significant Accounting Policies.Policies and Note 4. Regulatory Matters.)
(d)In 2017, Regulated Operations includes $14.0 million of income tax expense related to North Dakota investment tax credits transferred to Corporate and Other and higher pre-tax income for the favorable impact for the regulatory outcome of the MPUC’s modification of its November 2016 order on the allocation of North Dakota investment tax credits. There was 0 impact to net income for Regulated Operations. Corporate and Other recorded an offsetting income tax benefit of $7.9 million in 2017. (See Note 4. Regulatory Matters.)

(e) On March 26, 2019, ALLETE sold U.S. Water Services. The Company recognized income tax expense of $10.4 million for the gain on sale of U.S. Water Services which is reflected in Corporate and Other. (See Note 1. Operations and Significant Accounting Policies.)





NOTE 18.14. BUSINESS SEGMENTS (Continued)
As of December 312019
2018
Millions  
Assets  
Regulated Operations$4,130.8$3,952.5
   
ALLETE Clean Energy1,001.5
606.6
U.S. Water Services (a)

295.8
   
Corporate and Other350.5
310.1
Total Assets
$5,482.8

$5,165.0
Capital Expenditures  
Regulated Operations$230.9$211.9
   
ALLETE Clean Energy385.6
89.7
U.S. Water Services (a)

5.0
   
Corporate and Other10.1
12.0
Total Capital Expenditures
$626.6

$318.6

(a)On March 26, 2019, ALLETE sold U.S. Water Services. (See Note 1. Operations and Significant Accounting Policies.)


NOTE 15. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)


Information for any one quarterly period is not necessarily indicative of the results which may be expected for the year.
Quarter EndedMar. 31
Jun. 30
Sept. 30
Dec. 31
Millions Except Earnings Per Share    
2019    
Operating Revenue
$357.2

$290.4

$288.3

$304.6
Operating Income
$56.8

$36.2

$37.0

$49.8
Net Income Attributable to ALLETE
$70.5

$34.2

$31.2

$49.7
Earnings Per Share of Common Stock    
Basic
$1.37

$0.66

$0.60

$0.96
Diluted
$1.37

$0.66

$0.60

$0.96
2018    
Operating Revenue
$358.2

$344.1

$348.0

$448.3
Operating Income
$57.4

$36.5

$43.3

$64.0
Net Income Attributable to ALLETE
$51.0

$31.3

$30.7

$61.1
Earnings Per Share of Common Stock    
Basic
$1.00

$0.61

$0.59

$1.19
Diluted
$0.99

$0.61

$0.59

$1.18
2017    
Operating Revenue
$365.6

$353.3

$362.5

$337.9
Operating Income
$71.6

$54.0

$68.0

$32.3
Net Income Attributable to ALLETE
$49.0

$36.9

$44.9

$41.4
Earnings Per Share of Common Stock    
Basic
$0.97

$0.73

$0.88

$0.81
Diluted
$0.97

$0.72

$0.88

$0.81


Quarter EndedMar. 31
Jun. 30
Sept. 30
Dec. 31
Millions Except Earnings Per Share    
2016    
Operating Revenue
$333.8

$314.8

$349.6

$341.5
Operating Income
$66.8

$42.2

$53.4

$61.1
Net Income Attributable to ALLETE
$45.9

$24.8

$40.3

$44.3
Earnings Per Share of Common Stock    
Basic
$0.93

$0.50

$0.82

$0.89
Diluted
$0.93

$0.50

$0.81

$0.89
2015    
Operating Revenue
$320.0

$323.3

$462.5

$380.6
Operating Income
$56.4

$39.5

$85.2

$29.6
Net Income Attributable to ALLETE
$39.9

$22.5

$60.4

$18.3
Earnings Per Share of Common Stock    
Basic
$0.85

$0.46

$1.24

$0.37
Diluted
$0.85

$0.46

$1.23

$0.37



Schedule II


ALLETE


Valuation and Qualifying Accounts and Reserves
Balance at
Beginning of
Period
Additions
Deductions
from
Reserves (a)
Balance at
End of
Period
Balance at
Beginning of
Period
Additions
Deductions
from
Reserves (a)
Balance at
End of
Period
Charged to
Income
Other
Charges
Charged to
Income
Other
Charges
Millions      
Reserve Deducted from Related Assets      
Reserve For Uncollectible Accounts      
2014 Trade Accounts Receivable
$1.1

$1.8


$1.8

$1.1
2017 Trade Accounts Receivable
$3.1

$0.8


$1.8

$2.1
Finance Receivables – Long-Term
$0.6




$0.6





2015 Trade Accounts Receivable
$1.1

$1.6


$1.7

$1.0
2018 Trade Accounts Receivable
$2.1

$0.9


$1.3

$1.7
Finance Receivables – Long-Term
$0.6




$0.6





2016 Trade Accounts Receivable
$1.0
$4.1

$2.0

$3.1
2019 Trade Accounts Receivable
$1.7
$(0.1)

$0.7

$0.9
Finance Receivables – Long-Term
$0.6



$0.6






Deferred Asset Valuation Allowance      
2014 Deferred Tax Assets
$8.0
$14.1


$22.1
2015 Deferred Tax Assets
$22.1
$9.5


$31.6
2016 Deferred Tax Assets
$31.6

$11.4



$43.0
2017 Deferred Tax Assets
$43.0
$17.0


$60.0
2018 Deferred Tax Assets
$60.0
$6.5


$66.5
2019 Deferred Tax Assets
$66.5

$3.5



$70.0
(a)Includes uncollectible accounts written-off.












ALLETE, Inc. 20162019 Form 10-K
139122