UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
__________________________
FORM 10-K
__________________________
FORM10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended May 31, 20192022
OR
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to

Commission File Number: 1-7102
__________________________
NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
__________________________
District of Columbia52-0891669
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)(I.R.S. employer identification no.)
20701 Cooperative Way,Dulles,Virginia,20166
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (703) 467-1800
__________________________
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each ClassTrading Symbol(s)Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
7.35% Collateral Trust Bonds, due 2026 NRUC 26New York Stock Exchange
5.50% Subordinated Notes, due 2064NRUCNew York Stock Exchange
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
 
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.Yesx  No ¨
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act.Yes ¨  No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.Yesx  No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).Yes x  No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer  ☐    ¨ Accelerated filer  ¨ Non-accelerated filer   ☒ xSmaller reporting company ¨ Emerging growth company ¨
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transaction period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C.7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).Yes ¨  No x
The Registrant is a tax-exempt cooperative and therefore does not issue capital stock.





TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Page

i




Page





ii




CROSS REFERENCE INDEX OF MD&A TABLES

Table   Description PageTable DescriptionPage
1 Average Balances, Interest Income/Interest Expense and Average Yield/Cost 30
1Summary of Selected Financial Data26 
2 Rate/Volume Analysis of Changes in Interest Income/Interest Expense 32
2Average Balances, Interest Income/Interest Expense and Average Yield/Cost39 
3 Non-Interest Income 34
3Rate/Volume Analysis of Changes in Interest Income/Interest Expense41 
4 Derivative Average Notional Amounts and Average Interest Rates 35
4Non-Interest Income43 
5 Derivative Gains (Losses) 36
5Derivative Gains (Losses)44 
6 Non-Interest Expense 37
6Derivatives—Average Notional Amounts and Interest Rates45 
7 Loans Outstanding by Type and Member Class 38
7Comparative Swap Curves46 
8 Historical Retention Rate and Repricing Selection 39
8Non-Interest Expense47 
9 Long-Term Loan Scheduled Principal Payments 39
9Loans—Outstanding Amount by Member Class and Loan Type48 
10 Debt Product Types 40
10Debt—Debt Product Types50 
11 Total Debt Outstanding and Weighted-Average Interest Rates 41
11Total Debt Outstanding and Weighted-Average Interest Rates51 
12 Member Investments 43
12Member Investments53 
13 Collateral Pledged 44
13Equity54 
14 Unencumbered Loans 44
14Loans—Loan Portfolio Security Profile58 
15 Equity 45
15Loans—Loan Exposure to 20 Largest Borrowers59 
16 Guarantees Outstanding 46
16Loans—Loan Geographic Concentration61 
17 Maturities of Guarantee Obligations 47
17Loans—Troubled Debt Restructured Loans62 
18 Unadvanced Loan Commitments 47
18Loans—Nonperforming Loans63 
19 Notional Maturities of Unadvanced Loan Commitments 48
19Allowance for Credit Losses by Borrower Member Class and Evaluation Methodology65 
20 Maturities of Notional Amount of Unconditional Committed Lines of Credit 49
20Available Liquidity68 
21 Loan Portfolio Security Profile 51
21Liquidity Coverage Ratios69 
22 Loan Geographic Concentration 53
22Committed Bank Revolving Line of Credit Agreements70 
23 Loan Exposure to 20 Largest Borrowers 54
23Short-Term Borrowings—Outstanding Amount and Weighted-Average Interest Rates72 
24 Troubled Debt Restructured Loans 55
24Short-Term Borrowings—Funding Sources72 
25 Net Charge-Offs (Recoveries) 56
25Long-Term and Subordinated Debt— Issuances and Repayments73 
26 Allowance for Loan Losses 57
26Collateral Pledged74 
27 Rating Triggers for Derivatives 58
27Loans—Unencumbered Loans74 
28 Available Liquidity 59
28Loans—Maturities of Scheduled Principal Payments75 
29 Committed Bank Revolving Line of Credit Agreements 60
29Contractual Obligations76 
30 Short-Term Borrowings—Funding Sources 62
30Liquidity—Projected Sources and Uses of Funds77 
31 Short-Term Borrowings 62
31Credit Ratings78 
32 Issuances and Repayments of Long-Term and Subordinated Debt 64
32Interest Rate Sensitivity Analysis80 
33 Projected Sources and Uses of Liquidity from Debt and Investment Activity 65
33LIBOR-Indexed Financial Instruments81 
34 Contractual Obligations 66
34Selected Quarterly Financial Data83 
35 Credit Ratings 66
35Adjusted Net Income86 
36 Financial Covenant Ratios Under Committed Bank Revolving Lines of Credit Agreements 67
36TIER and Adjusted TIER86 
37 Financial Ratios Under Debt Indentures 68
37Adjusted Liabilities and Equity88 
38 Interest Rate Gap Analysis 69
38Debt-to-Equity Ratio and Adjusted Debt-to-Equity Ratio89 
39 Financial Instruments 71
39Members’ Equity89 
40 Loan Repricing 71
41 Adjusted Financial Measures—Income Statement 74
42 TIER and Adjusted TIER 74
43 Adjusted Financial Measures—Balance Sheet 75
44 Debt-to-Equity Ratio 76
45 Members’ Equity 76


iii




FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS


This Annual Report on Form 10-K (this “Report”for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2022 (“this Report” or “2022 Form 10-K”) contains certain statements that are considered “forward-looking statements” as defined in and within the meaning of the safe-harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1933, as amended, and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. 1995. Forward-looking statements which aredo not represent historical facts or statements of current conditions. Instead, forward-looking statements represent management’s current beliefs and expectations, based on certain assumptions and describeestimates made by, and information available to, management at the time the statements are made, regarding our future plans, strategies, operations, financial results or other events and expectations,developments, many of which, by their nature, are inherently uncertain and outside our control. Forward-looking statements are generally identified by ourthe use of words such as “intend,” “plan,” “may,” “should,” “will,” “project,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “expect,” “continue,” “potential,” “opportunity” and similar expressions, whether in the negative or affirmative. All statements about future expectations or projections, including statements about loan volume, the appropriatenessadequacy of the allowance for loancredit losses, operating income and expenses, leverage and debt-to-equity ratios, borrower financial performance, impaired loans, and sources and uses of liquidity, are forward-looking statements. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in our forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, actual results and performance may differ materially from our forward-looking statements due to several factors. Factorsstatements. Therefore, you should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statement and should consider the risks and uncertainties that could cause future resultsour current expectations to vary from our forward-looking statements, include,including, but are not limited to, general economic conditions, legislative changes including those that could affect our tax status governmental monetary and fiscal policies,other matters, demand for our loan products, lending competition, changes in the quality or composition of our loan portfolio, changes in our ability to access external financing, changes in the credit ratings on our debt, valuation of collateral supporting impaired loans, charges associated with our operation or disposition of foreclosed assets, technological changes within the rural electric utility industry, regulatory and economic conditions in the rural electric industry, nonperformance of counterparties to our derivative agreements, economic conditions and regulatory or technological changes within the rural electric industry, the costs and effectsimpact of legal or governmental proceedings involving us or our members, general economic conditions, governmental monetary and fiscal policies, the occurrence and effect of natural disasters, including severe weather events or public health emergencies, such as the emergence and spread since 2019 of a novel coronavirus (“COVID-19”) and the factors listed and described under “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in this Report. ExceptForward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and, except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update or publicly release any revisions to forward-looking statementsstatement to reflect the impact of events, circumstances or changes in expectations that arise after the date on which theany forward-looking statement is made.


PART I


Item 1.    Business

Item 1.Business
OVERVIEW


Our financial statements include the consolidated accounts of National Rural Utilities Cooperative Finance Corporation (“CFC”), National Cooperative Services Corporation (“NCSC”), Rural Telephone Finance Cooperative (“RTFC”) and subsidiaries created and controlled by CFC to hold foreclosed assets resulting from defaulted loans or bankruptcy. CFC and its consolidated entities have not held any foreclosed assets since the fiscal year ended May 31, 2017. Our principal operations are currently organized for management reporting purposes into three business segments, which are based on the accounts of each of the legal entities included in our consolidated financial statements and discussed below.

The business affairs of CFC, NCSC and RTFC are governed by separate boards of directors for each entity. We provide information on CFC’s corporate governance in “Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.” We provide information on the members of each of these entities below in “Item 1. Business—Members” and describe the financing products offered to members by each entity under “Item 1. Business—Loan and Guarantee Programs.” Information on the financial performance of our business segments is disclosed in “Note 16—Business Segments.” Unless stated otherwise, references to “we,” “our” or “us” relate to CFC and its consolidated entities. All references to members within this document include members, associates and affiliates of CFC and its consolidated entities, except where indicated otherwise.

1


CFC

CFC is a member-owned, nonprofit finance cooperative association incorporated under the laws of the District of Columbia in April 1969. CFC’s principal purpose is to provide its members with financing to supplement the loan programs of the Rural Utilities Service (“RUS”) of the United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”). CFC makesextends loans to its rural electric members so they can acquire, constructfor construction, acquisitions, system and operatefacility repairs and maintenance, enhancements and ongoing operations to support the goal of electric distribution and generation and transmission (“power supply”) systems and related facilities.of providing reliable, affordable power to the customers they service. CFC also provides its members with credit enhancements in the form of letters of credit and guarantees of debt obligations. As a cooperative, CFC is owned by and exclusively serves its membership, which consists of not-for-profit entities or subsidiaries or affiliates of not-for-profit entities. CFC is exempt from federal income taxes under Section 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code. As a member-owned cooperative, CFC’s objective is not to maximize profit, but rather to offer members cost-based financial products and services. As described below under “Allocation and Retirement of Patronage Capital,” CFC annually allocates its net earnings, which consist of net income excluding the effect of certain noncash accounting entries, to: (i) a cooperative educational fund; (ii) a general reserve, if necessary; (iii) members based on each member’s patronage of CFC’s loan programs during the year; and (iv) a members’ capital reserve. CFC funds its activities primarily through a combination of public and private issuances of debt securities, member investments and retained equity. As a Section 501(c)(4) tax-exempt, member-owned cooperative, weCFC cannot issue equity securities.


Our financial statements include the consolidated accounts of CFC, National Cooperative Services Corporation (“NCSC”), Rural Telephone Finance Cooperative (“RTFC”) and subsidiaries created and controlled by CFC to hold foreclosed assets resulting from defaulted loans or bankruptcy. We did not carry any foreclosed assets on our consolidated balance sheet as of May 31, 2019 or May 31, 2018. Unless stated otherwise, references to “we,” “our” or “us” relate to CFC and its consolidated entities. All references to members within this document include members, associates and affiliates of CFC and its consolidated entities, except where indicated otherwise.NCSC


NCSC is a taxable cooperative incorporated in 1981 in the District of Columbia as a member-owned cooperative association. The principal purpose of NCSC is to provide financing to its members, entities eligible to be members of CFC and the for-profit and not-for-profit entities that are owned, operated or controlled by, or provide significant benefit to Class


A, B and C members of CFC. See “Members” below for a description of our member classes. NCSC’s membership consists of distribution systems, power supply systems and statewide and regional associations that were members of CFC as of May 31, 2019.2022. CFC, which is the primary source of funding for NCSC, manages NCSC’s business operations under a management agreement that is automatically renewable on an annual basis unless terminated by either party. NCSC pays CFC a fee and, in exchange, CFC reimburses NCSC for loan losses under a guarantee agreement. As a taxable cooperative, NCSC pays income tax based on its reported taxable income and deductions. NCSC is headquartered with CFC in Dulles, Virginia.


RTFC

RTFC is a taxable Subchapter T cooperative association originally incorporated in South Dakota in 1987 and reincorporated as a member-owned cooperative association in the District of Columbia in 2005. RTFC’s principal purpose is to provide financing for its rural telecommunications members and their affiliates. RTFC’s membership consists of a combination of not-for-profit and for-profit entities. CFC is the sole lender to and manages RTFC’s business operations through a management agreement that is automatically renewable on an annual basis unless terminated by either party. RTFC pays CFC a fee and, in exchange, CFC reimburses RTFC for loan losses under a guarantee agreement. As permitted under Subchapter T of the Internal Revenue Code, RTFC pays income tax based on its taxable income, excluding patronage-sourced earnings allocated to its patrons. RTFC is headquartered with CFC in Dulles, Virginia.


Our principal operations are currently organized for management reporting purposes into three business segments: CFC, NCSC and RTFC. We provide information on the financial performance of our business segments in “Note 15—Business Segments.”
OUR BUSINESS


OurCFC was established by and for the rural electric cooperative network to provide affordable financing alternatives to electric cooperatives. While our business strategy and policies are set by our boardthe CFC Board of directorsDirectors and may be amended or revised from time to time, by the boardfundamental goal of directors. We are a nonprofit tax-exempt cooperative finance organization, whose primary focusour overall business model is to providework with our members with the credit products they need to fundensure that CFC is able to meet their operations. As such, our business focuses on lendingfinancing needs, as well as provide industry expertise and strategic services to electric systemsaid them in delivering affordable and securing accessreliable essential services to capital through diverse funding sources at rates that allow us to offer cost-based credit products to our members.their communities.


2


Focus on Electric Lending


CFC focusesAs a member-owned, nonprofit finance cooperative, our primary objective is to provide our members with the credit products they need to fund their operations. As such, we primarily focus on lending to its member electric utility cooperatives. Substantially allsystems and securing access to capital through diverse funding sources at rates that allow us to offer cost-based credit products to our members. Rural electric cooperatives, most of our electric cooperative borrowers continuewhich are not-for-profit entities, were established to demonstrate stable operating performance and strong financial ratios. Ourprovide electricity in rural areas historically deemed too costly to be served by investor-owned utilities. As such, our electric cooperative members experience limited competition asbecause they generally operate in exclusive territories, and the majority of which are not rate regulated. Loans to electric utility organizations representedaccounted for approximately 98% and 99% of our total loans outstanding as of both May 31, 20192022 and 2018,2021, respectively. Substantially all of our electric cooperative borrowers continued to demonstrate stable operating performance and strong financial ratios as of May 31, 2022.


Maintain Diversified Funding Sources


We strive to maintain diversified funding sources beyond capital market offerings of debt securities. We offer various short- and long-term unsecured investment products to our members and affiliates, including commercial paper, select notes, daily liquidity fund notes, medium-term notes and subordinated certificates. We continue to issue debt securities, such as secured collateral trust bonds, unsecured medium-term notes and dealer commercial paper, in the capital markets. We also have access to funds through bank revolving line of credit arrangements, government-guaranteed programs such as funding from the Federal Financing Bank that is guaranteed by RUS through the Guaranteed Underwriter Program of the USDA (the “Guaranteed Underwriter Program”), as well as private placement note purchase agreements with the Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (“Farmer Mac”). We provide additional information on our funding sources in “Item 7. MD&A—Consolidated Balance Sheet Analysis,” “Item 7. MD&A—Liquidity Risk,” “Note 6—Short-Term Borrowings,” “Note 7—Long-Term Debt,” “Note 8—Subordinated Deferrable Debt” and “Note 9—Members’ Subordinated Certificates.”



LOAN PROGRAMSMEMBERS


Our consolidated membership, after taking into consideration entities that are members of both CFC and NCSC and eliminating overlapping members between CFC, NCSC and RTFC, totaled 1,425 members and 248 associates as of May 31, 2022, compared with 1,424 members and 246 associates as of May 31, 2021.

CFC

CFC lends to its members and associates.associates and also provides credit enhancements in the form of guarantees of debt obligations and letters of credit. Membership in CFC is limited to cooperative or not-for-profit rural electric systems that are eligible to borrow from RUS under its Electric Loan Program and affiliates of these entities. CFC categorizes its members, all of which are not-for-profit entities or subsidiaries or affiliates of not-for-profit entities, into classes based on member type because the demands and needs of each member class differs. Affiliates represent holding companies, subsidiaries and other entities that are owned, controlled or operated by members. Members are not required to have outstanding loans from RUS as a condition of borrowing from CFC. CFC membership consists of members in 50 states and three U.S. territories. In addition to members, CFC has associates that are nonprofit groups or entities organized on a cooperative basis that are owned, controlled or operated by members and are engaged in or plan to engage in furnishing non-electric services primarily for the benefit of the ultimate consumers of CFC members. Associates are not eligible to vote on matters put to a vote of the membership. CFC’s members, by member class, and associates were as follows as of May 31, 2022.

3


CFC Member
Member TypeClassMay 31, 2022
Distribution systemsA842
Power supply systemsB68
Statewide and regional associations, including NCSCC62
National association of cooperatives(1)
D1
Total CFC members973
Associates, including RTFC45
Total CFC members and associates1,018
____________________________
(1) National Rural Electric Cooperative Association is our sole class D member.

NCSC

Membership in NCSC lendsincludes organizations that are Class A, B and C members of CFC, or eligible for such membership and are approved for membership by the NCSC Board of Directors. In addition to its members, NCSC has associates that may include members of CFC, entities eligible to be members of CFC and its associates, for-profit and nonprofitnot-for-profit entities that are owned, operatedcontrolled or controlledoperated by, or provide significant benefit to, Class A, B and C members of CFC. All of NCSC’s members also were CFC members. members as of May 31, 2022. CFC is not, however, a member of NCSC. NCSC’s members and associates were as follows as of May 31, 2022.

CFC Member
Member TypeClassMay 31, 2022
Distribution systemsA447
Power supply systemsB3
Statewide associationsC6
Total NCSC members456
Associates198
Total NCSC members and associates654

RTFC

Membership in RTFC is limited to cooperative corporations, nonprofit corporations, private corporations, public corporations, utility districts and other public bodies that are approved by the RTFC Board of Directors and are actively borrowing or are eligible to borrow from RUS’s traditional infrastructure loan program. These companies must be engaged directly or indirectly in furnishing telephone services as the licensed incumbent carrier. Holding companies, subsidiaries and other organizations that are owned, controlled or operated by members, which are referred to as affiliates, are eligible to borrow from RTFC. Associates are organizations that provide non-telephone or non-telecommunications services to rural telecommunications companies that are approved by the RTFC Board of Directors. Neither affiliates nor associates are eligible to vote on matters put to a vote of the membership. CFC and NCSC are not members of RTFC. RTFC’s members and associates were as follows as of May 31, 2022.

Member TypeMay 31, 2022
Members453
Associates6
Total RTFC members and associates459

4


LOAN AND GUARANTEE PROGRAMS

CFC lends to its members and associates and organizations affiliated with itsalso provides credit enhancements in the form of guarantees of debt obligations and letters of credit. NCSC and RTFC also lend and provide credit enhancements to their members and associates. See “Item 1. Business—Members” for additionalFor information on the entities that comprise our membership. Loans to NCSC associates may require a guaranteemembership of repayment to NCSC from the CFC member cooperative with which it is affiliated. CFC, NCSC and RTFC, loanssee “Item 1. Business—Members.”

CFC, NCSC and RTFC loan commitments generally contain provisions that restrict further borrower advances or trigger an event of default if there is any material adverse change in the business or condition, financial or otherwise, of the borrower. Below is additional information on the loan and guarantee programs offered by CFC, NCSC and RTFC.


CFC Loan Programs


Long-Term Loans


CFC’s long-term loans generally have the following characteristics:


terms of up to 35 years on a senior secured basis and terms of up to five years on an unsecured basis;
amortizing, bullet maturity or serial payment structures;
the property, plant and equipment financed by and securing the long-term loan has a useful life generally equal to or in excess of the loan maturity;
flexibility for the borrower to select a fixed interest rate for periods of one to 35 years or a variable interest rate; and
the ability for the borrower to select various tranches with either a fixed or variable interest rate for each tranche.


Borrowers typically have the option of selecting a fixed or variable interest rate at the time of each advance on long-term loan facilities. When selecting a fixed rate, the borrower has the option to choose a fixed rate for a term of one year through the final maturity of the loan. When the selected fixed interest rate term expires, the borrower may select another fixed rate for a term of one year through the remaining loan maturity or the current variable rate. Long-term fixed rates are set daily for new loan advances and loans that reprice. The fixed rate on each loan is generally determined on the day the loan is advanced or repriced based on the term selected. The variable rate is set on the first day of each month.


To be in compliance with the covenants in the loan agreement and eligible for loan advances, distribution systems generally must maintain an average modified debt service coverage ratio, as defined in the loan agreement, of 1.35 or greater. CFC may make long-term loans to distribution systems, on a case-by-case basis, that do not meet thesethis general criteria.criterion. Power supply systems generally are required: (i) to maintain an average modified debt service coverage ratio, as defined in the loan agreement, of 1.00 or greater; (ii) to establish and collect rates and other revenue in an amount to yield margins for interest, as defined in an indenture, in each fiscal year sufficient to equal at least 1.00; or (iii) both. CFC may make long-term loans to power supply systems, on a case-by-case basis, that may include other requirements, such as maintenance of a minimum equity level.


Line of Credit Loans


Line of credit loans are designed primarily to assist borrowers with liquidity and cash management and are generally advanced at variable interest rates. Line of credit loans are typically revolving facilities. Certain line of credit loans require the borrower to pay off the principal balance for at least five consecutive business days at least once during each 12-month period. Line of credit loans are generally unsecured and may be conditional or unconditional facilities.


Line of credit loans can be made on an emergency basis when financing is needed quickly to address weather-related or other unexpected events and can also arebe made available as interim financing when a member either receives RUS approval to obtain a loan and is awaiting its initial advance of funds or submits a loan application that is pending approval from RUS (sometimes referred to as “bridge loans”). In these cases, when the borrower receives the RUS loan advance, the funds must be used to repay the bridge loans.


Syndicated Line of Credit and Term Loans


A syndicatedSyndicated line of credit loan isand term loans are typically a large financingfinancings offered by a group of lenders that work together to provide funds for a single borrower. Syndicated loans are generally unsecured, floating-rate loans that can be provided on a

5



revolving or term basis for tenors that range from several months to five years. Syndicated financings are arranged for borrowers on a case-by-case basis. CFC may act as lead lender, arranger and/or administrative agent for the syndicated facilities. CFC will syndicate these line of credit facilities on a best effort basis.


NCSC Loan Programs


NCSC makes loans to electric cooperatives and their subsidiaries that provide non-electric services in the energy and telecommunication industries as well as to entities that provide substantial benefit to CFC members, including eligible solar energy providers and investor-owned utilities. Loans to NCSC associates may require a guarantee of repayment to NCSC from the CFC member cooperative with which it is affiliated.

Long-Term Loans


NCSC’s long-term loans generally have the following characteristics:


terms of up to 3530 years on a senior secured orbasis and terms of up to five years on an unsecured basis;
amortizing, balloon, bullet maturity or serial payment structures;
the property, plant and equipment financed by and securing the long-term loan has a useful life equal to or in excess of the loan maturity;
flexibility for the borrower to select a fixed interest rate for periods of one to 3530 years or a variable interest rate; and
the ability for the borrower to select various tranches with either a fixed or variable interest rate for each tranche.


NCSC allows borrowers to select a fixed interest rate or a variable interest rate at the time of each advance on long-term loan facilities. When selecting a fixed rate, the borrower has the option to choose a fixed rate for a term of one year through the final maturity of the loan. When the selected fixed interest rate term expires, the borrower may select another fixed rate for a term of one year through the remaining loan maturity or the current variable rate. The fixed rate on a loan generally is determined on the day the loan is advanced or repriced based on the term selected. The variable rate is set on the first day of each month.


Line of Credit Loans


NCSC also provides revolving line of credit loans to assist borrowers with liquidity and cash management on terms similar to those provided by CFC as described herein.


RTFC Loan Programs
Long-Term Loans


RTFC primarily makes long-term loans to rural local exchange carriers or holding companies of rural local exchange carriers for debt refinancing, construction or upgrades of infrastructure, acquisitions and other corporate purposes. Most of these rural telecommunications companies have diversified their operations and also provide broadband services.


Long-Term Loans

RTFC’s long-term loans generally have the following characteristics:


terms not exceeding 10 years on a senior secured basis and terms of up to five years on an unsecured basis;
amortizing or bullet maturity payment structures;
the property, plant and equipment financed by and securing the long-term loan has a useful life generally equal to or in excess of the loan maturity;
flexibility for the borrower to select a fixed interest rate for periods from one year to the final loan maturity or a variable interest rate; and
the ability for the borrower to select various tranches with either a fixed or variable interest rate for each tranche.


When a selected fixed interest rate term expires, generally the borrower may select another fixed-rate term or the current variable rate. The fixed rate on a loan is generally determined on the day the loan is advanced or converted to a fixed rate based on the term selected. The variable rate is set on the first day of each month.

6


To borrow from RTFC, a rural telecommunication system generally must be able to demonstrate the ability to achieve and maintain an annual debt service coverage ratio of 1.25. RTFC may make long-term loans to rural telecommunication systems, on a case-by-case basis, that do not meet this general criterion.




Line of Credit Loans


RTFC also provides revolving line of credit loans to assist borrowers with liquidity and cash management on terms similar to those provided by CFC as described herein.


Loan Features and Options


Interest Rates


As a member-owned cooperative finance organization, we areCFC is a cost-based lender. As such, our interest rates are set based on a yield that we believe will generate a reasonable level of earnings to cover our cost of funding, general and administrative expenses and provision for credit losses. Long-term fixed rates are set daily for new loan loss provision.advances and loans that reprice. The fixed rate on each loan is generally determined on the day the loan is advanced or repriced based on the term selected. The variable rate is established monthly. Various standardized discounts may reduce the stated interest rates for borrowers meeting certain criteria related to performance, volume, collateral and equity requirements.


Conversion Option


Generally, a borrower may convert a long-term loan from a variable interest rate to a fixed interest rate at any time without a fee and convert a long-term loan from a fixed rate to another fixed rate or to a variable rate at any time based on current loan policies.generally subject to a make-whole premium.


Prepayment Option


Generally, borrowers may prepay long-term fixed-rate loans at any time, subject to payment of an administrative fee and a make-whole premium, and prepay long-term variable-rate loans at any time, subject to payment of an administrative fee. Line of credit loans may be prepaid at any time without a fee.


Loan Security


Long-term loans made by CFC typically are senior secured on parity with other secured lenders (primarily RUS), if any, by all assets and revenue of the borrower, subject to standard liens typical in utility mortgages such as those related to taxes, worker’s compensation awards, mechanics’ and similar liens, rights-of-way and governmental rights. We are able to obtain liens on parity with liens for the benefit of RUS because RUS’ form of mortgage expressly provides for other lenders such as CFC to have a parity lien position if the borrower satisfies certain conditions or obtains a written lien accommodation from RUS. When we make loans to borrowers that have existing loans from RUS, we generally require those borrowers to either obtain such a lien accommodation or satisfy the conditions necessary for our loan to be secured on parity under the mortgage with the loan from RUS. As noted above, CFC line of credit loans generally are unsecured.


We provide additional information on our loan programs in the sections “Item 7. MD&A—Consolidated Balance Sheet Analysis,” “Item 7. MD&A—Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements” and “Item 7. MD&A—Credit Risk.”

Guarantee Programs
GUARANTEE PROGRAMS


When we guarantee our members’ debt obligations, we use the same credit policies and monitoring procedures for guarantees as for loans. If a member system defaults in its obligation to pay debt service, then we are obligated to pay any required amounts under our guarantees. Meeting our guarantee obligations satisfies the underlying obligation of our member systems and prevents the exercise of remedies by the guarantee beneficiary based upon a payment default by a member system. The member system is required to repay any amount advanced by us with interest pursuant to the documents evidencing the member system’s reimbursement obligation. We were not required to perform pursuant to any of our guarantee obligations during the year ended May 31, 2019.


7


Guarantees of Long-Term Tax-Exempt Bonds


We guarantee debt issued for our members’ construction or acquisition of pollution control, solid waste disposal, industrial development and electric distribution facilities. Governmental authorities issue such debt on a nonrecourse basis and the


interest thereon is exempt from federal taxation. The proceeds of the offering are made available to the member system, which in turn is obligated to pay the governmental authority amounts sufficient to service the debt.


If a system defaults for failure to make the debt payments and any available debt service reserve funds have been exhausted, we are obligated to pay scheduled debt service under our guarantee. Such payment will prevent the occurrence of an event of payment default that would otherwise permit acceleration of the bond issue. The system is required to repay any amount that we advance pursuant to our guarantee plus interest on that advance. This repayment obligation, together with the interest thereon, is typically senior secured on parity with other lenders (including, in most cases, RUS), by a lien on substantially all of the system’s assets. If the security instrument is a common mortgage with RUS, then in general, we may not exercise remedies for up to two years following default. However, if the debt is accelerated under the common mortgage because of a determination that the related interest is not tax-exempt, the system’s obligation to reimburse us for any guarantee payments will be treated as a long-term loan. The system is required to pay us initial and/or ongoing guarantee fees in connection with these transactions.


Certain guaranteed long-term debt bears interest at variable rates that are adjusted at intervals of one to 270 days including weekly, every five weeks or semi-annually to a level favorable to their resale or auction at par. If funding sources are available, the member that issued the debt may choose a fixed interest rate on the debt. When the variable rate is reset, holders of variable-rate debt have the right to tender the debt for purchase at par. In some transactions, we have committed to purchase this debt as liquidity provider if it cannot otherwise be re-marketed. If we hold the securities, the member cooperative pays us the interest earned on the bonds or interest calculated based on our short-term variable interest rate, whichever is greater. The system is required to pay us stand-by liquidity fees in connection with these transactions.


Letters of Credit


In exchange for a fee, we issue irrevocable letters of credit to support members’ obligations to energy marketers, other third parties and to the USDA Rural Business-Cooperative Service. Each letter of credit is supported by a reimbursement agreement with the member on whose behalf the letter of credit was issued. In the event a beneficiary draws on a letter of credit, the agreement generally requires the member to reimburse us within one year from the date of the draw, with interest accruing from the draw date at our line of credit variable interest rate.


The U.S. Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) has designated CFC as an acceptable source for letters of credit in support of USDA and FCC programs that encourage deployment of high-speed broadband services throughout rural America. The designation allows CFC to provide credit support for rural electric cooperatives and telecommunication cooperativesproviders that participate in programs designed to increase deployment of broadband services to underserved rural areas.


Other Guarantees


We may provide other guarantees as requested by our members. Other guarantees are generally unsecured with guarantee fees payable to us.


We provide additional information on our guarantee programs and outstanding guarantee amounts as of May 31, 20192022 and 20182021 in “Item 7. MD&A—Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements” and “Note 13—Guarantees.”



8


INVESTMENT POLICY


We invest funds in accordance with policies adopted by our board of directors. Pursuant to our current investment policy, an Investment Management Committee was established to oversee and administer our investments with the objective of seeking returns consistent with the preservation of principal and maintenanceto provide a supplementary source of adequate liquidity. The Investment Management Committee may direct funds to be invested in:in direct obligations of, or obligations guaranteed by, the United States (“U.S.”) or agencies thereof and investments in relatively short-term U.S. dollar-denominated fixed-income securities such as government-sponsored enterprises, certain financial institutions in the form of overnight investment products and Eurodollar deposits, bankers’ acceptances, certificates of deposit, working capital acceptances or other deposits. Other permitted investments include highly rated obligations, such as commercial paper, certain obligations of foreign governments, municipal securities, asset backedasset-backed securities, mortgage-backed securities and certain corporate bonds. In addition, we may invest in overnight or term repurchase agreements. Investments are denominated in USU.S. dollars exclusively. All of these investments are subject to requirements and limitations set forth in our board investment policy.

INDUSTRY


Overview


SinceOur rural electric cooperative members operate in the enactmentenergy sector, which is one of 16 critical infrastructure sectors identified by the U.S. government because the services provided by each sector, all of which have an impact on other sectors, are deemed as essential in supporting and maintaining the overall functioning of the U.S. economy. Rural Electrification Act in 1936, RUS has financed the construction of electric generating plants, transmission facilities and distribution systems to provide electricity to rural areas. Today, with CFC membership comprised, incooperatives are an integral part of ruralthe U.S. electric utility systems in 49 states and three U.S. territories, the percentage of farms and residences in rural areasindustry, a sub-sector of the United States receiving central stationenergy sector. According to the National Rural Electric Cooperative Association (“NRECA”,) electric service increased from 11%cooperatives serve as power providers for approximately 1 in 19348 individuals in the U.S., totaling approximately 42 million people, including over 20 million businesses, homes, schools and farms across 48 states. Electric cooperatives provide power to almost 100% currently.

RUS provides loans, guarantees and other formsapproximately 56% of financial assistance to rural electric system borrowers. Under the Rural Electrification Act, RUS is authorized to make direct loans to systems that qualify fornation’s land mass. Based on the hardship program (5% interest rate), the municipal rate program (based on a municipal government obligation index) and a Treasury rate program (at Treasury plus 0.125%). RUS also is authorized to guarantee loans that bear interest at a rate agreed uponlatest annual data reported by the borrowerU.S. Energy Information Administration, a statistical and analytical agency within the lender (which generally has beenU.S. Department of Energy, the Federal Financing Bank). RUS exercises oversightelectric utility industry had revenue of borrowers’ operations. Its loans and guarantees are securedapproximately $394 billion in 2020.

CFC was established by a mortgage or indenture on substantially all of the system’s assets and revenue.

Leading up to CFC’s formation in 1969, there was a growing need for capital for electric utility cooperatives to build new electric facilities due to growth in rural America. The electric cooperatives formed CFC to provideserve as a supplemental financing source to RUS loan programs and to mitigate uncertainty related to government funding.

CFC aggregates the combined strength of its rural electric member cooperatives to access the public capital markets and other funding sources. CFC works cooperatively with RUS; however, CFC is not a federal agency or a government-sponsored enterprise. Our members are not required to have outstanding loans from RUS as a condition of borrowing from CFC. CFC meets the financial needs of its rural electric members by:


providing financing to RUS-eligible rural electric utility systems for infrastructure, including for those facilities that are not eligible for financing from RUS;
providing bridge loans required by borrowers in anticipation of receiving RUS funding;
providing financial products not otherwise available from RUS, including lines of credit, letters of credit, guarantees on tax-exempt financing, weather-related disaster recoveryemergency lines of credit, unsecured loans and investment products such as commercial paper, select notes, medium-term notes and member capital securities, select notessecurities; and medium-term notes; and
meeting the financing needs of those rural electric systems that repay or prepay their RUS loans and replace the government loans with private capital.


Many electric cooperatives are making investments in fiber to support core electric plant communications. Some of these electric cooperatives are leveraging these fiber assets to offer broadband services, either directly or through partnering with local telecommunication companies and others.


Electric Member Operating Environment


In general, electric cooperatives have not been significantly impacted by the effects of retail deregulation. There were 19 states that had adopted programs that allow consumers to choose their supplier of electricity as of May 31, 2019.2022. Depending on the state, the choices can range from being limited to commercial and industrial consumers to “retail choice” for all consumers. In most states, cooperatives have been exempted from or have been allowed to opt out of the regulations allowing for competition. In states offering retail competition, it is important to note that while consumers may be able to
9


choose their energy supplier, the electric utility still receives compensation for the necessary service of delivering electricity to consumers through its utility transmission and distribution plant. 


The electric utility industry is facing a potential decrease to kilowatt-hour sales due to technology advances that increase energy efficiency of all appliances and devices used in the home and in businesses as well as from distributed generation in the form of rooftop solar and home generators (“behind-the-meter generation”). Electric cooperatives are facing the same issues, but in general to a lesser extent than investor-owned power systems. To date, we have not seen negative impacts in the electric cooperative financial results due to behind-the-meter generation.

Electric cooperatives have options available to mitigate the impact of such issues, such as rate structures to ensure that costs are appropriately recovered for grid and other necessary ancillary services. To date,services and the use of electricity for end-uses that would otherwise be powered by fossil fuels where doing so reduces emissions and saves consumers money (“beneficial electrification”). The push away from fossil fuel use may continue the trend toward beneficial electrification such as the adoption of electric vehicles, which may increase kilowatt-hour sales to many utilities. Beneficial electrification may also improve the utilities’ ability to balance load profiles by leveraging and balancing consumer and system assets such as electric vehicles and battery storage.

Facilitation of Rural Broadband Expansion by Electric Cooperatives

Many electric cooperatives are making investments in fiber to support core electric plant communications. Some of these electric cooperatives are leveraging these fiber assets to offer broadband services, either directly or through partnering with local telecommunication companies and others. Over 30 electric cooperatives were awarded approximately $250 million in federal funding through the Connect America Fund Phase II auction (“CAF II”) process by the FCC that was held in 2018. The awarded funds are being distributed over a 10-year period. More than 190 electric cooperatives, many of which are already offering or building out projects, were awarded approximately $1.6 billion though the FCC’s Rural Development Opportunity Fund (“RDOF”). Those funds also will be distributed over a 10-year period. As federal and state governments increase funding opportunities for electric cooperatives in order to offer broadband services, we have not seen negative impactswill continue to increase our credit support, which may include loans and/or letters of credit, to borrowers who participate in CAF II, RDOF and other programs designed to increase broadband services in rural areas. CFC began tracking loans for broadband services in October 2017. We estimate, based on information available to us, loans outstanding to our members related to the electric cooperative financial results dueconstruction and operation of broadband services increased to behind-the-meter generation.approximately $1,647 million as of May 31, 2022, from approximately $854 million as of May 31, 2021.


Regulatory Oversight of Electric Cooperatives


There are 11 states in which some or all electric cooperatives are subject to state regulatory oversight of their rates and tariffs (terms and conditions) by state utility commissions.commissions and do not have a right to opt out of regulation. Those states are Arizona, Arkansas, Hawaii, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, New Mexico, Vermont, Virginia and West Virginia.

Regulatory jurisdiction by state commissions generally includes rate and tariff regulation, the issuance of securities and the enforcement of service territory as provided for by state law.


The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) has regulatory authority over three aspects of electric power, as provided for under Parts II and III of the Federal Power Act (“FPA”) provide the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) with regulatory authority over three aspects of electric power::


the transmission of electric energy in interstate commerce;
the sale of electric energy at wholesale in interstate commerce; and
the approval and enforcement of reliability standards affecting all users, owners and operators of the bulk power system.


TheIn addition, FERC also regulates the issuance of securities by public utilities under the FPA providedin the event the applicable state commission does not.


Our electric distribution and power supply members are subject to regulation by various federal, regional, state and local authorities with respect to the environmental effects of their operations. At the federal level, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) from time to time proposes rulemakings that could force the electric utility industry to incur capital costs to comply with potential new regulations and possibly retire coal-fired generating capacity. Since there are only
10


11 states in which some or all electric cooperatives are subject to state regulatory oversight of their rates and tariffs, in most cases any associated costs of compliance can be passed on to cooperative consumers without additional regulatory approval. On

On June 19, 2019,30, 2022, the Supreme Court limited the power of the EPA issuedto regulate greenhouse gas emissions from existing power plants. The Supreme Court noted that Congress did not give the final Affordable Clean Energy (“ACE”) rule. The ACE rule replacesEPA the 2015authority to adopt a regulatory scheme that devised emissions caps based on the generation-shifting approach the EPA took in the Clean Power Plan, whicha 2015 rule that was stayed bypreviously repealed. However, the U.S. Supreme Court and never went into effect. Falling under Section 111(d)also noted that it was not deciding whether EPA's authority was limited solely to measures that improve the pollution performance of the Federal Clean Air Act, the ACE rule addresses existing sources of emissions and sets a framework under which states should develop plans establishing standards of performance for their existing emissions sources and then submit those plans to the EPA for approval. States will have three years from the date of the final rule to prepare and submit a plan that establishes a standard of performance. It is expected that certain states and environmental groups will challenge the ACE rule in federal litigation.specific individual sources.




LENDING COMPETITION


Overview

RUS is the largest lender to electric cooperatives. RUS providescooperatives, providing them with long-term secured loans. CFC provides financial products and services to its members, primarily in the form of long-term secured and short-term unsecured loans, to its electric cooperative members to supplement RUS financing, to provide loans to members that have elected not to borrow from RUS, and to bridge long-term financing provided by RUS. We also offer other financing options, such as credit support in the form of letters of credit and guarantees, loan syndications and loan participations. Our credit products are tailored to meet the specific needs of each borrower, and we often offer specific transaction structures that our competitors do not provide. CFC also offers certain risk-mitigation products and interest rate discounts on secured, long-term loans for its members that meet performance, volume, collateral and equity requirements.


Primary Lending Competitors

CFC’s primary competitor is CoBank, ACB, a federally chartered instrumentality of the United StatesU.S. that is a member of the Farm Credit System. CFC also competes with banks, other financial institutions and the capital markets to provide loans and other financial products to our members. As a result, we are competing with the customer service, pricing and funding options our members are able to obtain from these sources. We attempt to minimize the effect of competition by offering a variety of loan options and value-added services and by leveraging the working relationships developed with the majority of our members over the past 5053 years. Further, on an annual basis, we allocate substantially all net earnings to members (i) in the form of patronage capital, which reduces our members’ effective cost of borrowing, and (ii) through the members’ capital reserve. The value-added services that we provide include, but are not limited to, benchmarking tools, financial models, publications and various conferences, meetings, facilitation services and training workshops.

In order to meet other financing needs of our members, we offer options that include credit support in the form of letters of credit and guarantees, loan syndications and loan participations. Our credit products are tailored to meet the specific needs of each member cooperative, and we often offer specific transaction structures that our competitors do not provide. CFC also offers certain risk mitigation products and interest rate discounts on secured, long-term loans for its members that meet certain criteria, including performance, volume, collateral and equity requirements.

CFC has established certain funds to benefit its members. Since 1981, CFC has set aside a portion of its annual net earnings in a cooperative educational fund to promote awareness and appreciation of the cooperative principles. As directed by the CFC Board of Directors, a portion of the contributions to the fund are distributed through the electric cooperative statewide associations. Since 1986, CFC has supported its members’ efforts to protect their service territories from erosion or takeover by other utilities through assistance from the cooperative system integrity fund, which is funded through voluntary contributions from members. Amounts from the integrity fund are distributed to applicants who establish that: (i) all or a significant portion of their consumers, services or facilities face a hostile threat of acquisition or annexation by a competing entity; (ii) face a significant threat in their ability to continue to provide non-electric energy services to customers; or (iii) are facing regulatory, judicial or legislative challenges that threaten their existence under the cooperative business model.

Our rural electric borrowers are mostly private companies; thus, the overall size of the rural electric lending market cannot be determined from public information. We estimate the size of the overall rural electric lending market from the annual financial and statistical reports filed with us by our members using calendar year data; however, there are certain limitations with regard to these estimates, including the following:

while the underlying data included in the financial and statistical reports may be audited, the preparation of the financial and statistical reports is not audited;
in some cases, not all members provide the annual financial and statistical reports on a timely basis to be included in summarized results; and
the financial and statistical reports do not include comprehensive data on indebtedness by lenders other than RUS.

The following table displays long-term debt outstanding to CFC, RUS and other lenders in the electric cooperative industry as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, based on financial data reported to us by our electric utility cooperative members. The data as of December 31, 2018 was provided by 812 distribution systems and 54 power supply systems, while the data as of December 31, 2017 was provided by 812 distribution systems and 58 power supply systems.


  December 31,
  2018 2017
(Dollars in thousands) Debt
Outstanding
 % of Total Debt
Outstanding
 % of Total
Total long-term debt reported by members:(1)
        
Distribution $49,464,999
   $48,147,703
  
Power supply 44,876,633
   47,862,984
  
Less: Long-term debt funded by RUS (40,039,961)   (39,180,420)  
Members’ non-RUS long-term debt $54,301,671
   $56,830,267
  
         
Funding source of members’ long-term debt:        
Long-term debt funded by CFC $22,897,749
 42% $22,671,264
 40%
Long-term debt funded by other lenders 31,403,922
 58
 34,159,003
 60
Members’ non-RUS long-term debt $54,301,671
 100% $56,830,267
 100%
____________________________
(1) Reported amounts are based on member-provided information, which may not have been subject to audit by an independent accounting firm.

Members’ long-term debt funded by CFC, by type, as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 is summarized further below.
  December 31,
  2018 2017
(Dollars in thousands) Debt
Outstanding
 % of Total Debt
Outstanding
 % of Total
Distribution $18,782,014
 82% $18,489,086
 82%
Power supply 4,115,735
 18
 4,182,178
 18
Long-term debt funded by CFC $22,897,749
 100% $22,671,264
 100%


We are not able to specifically identify the amount of debt our members have outstanding to CoBank, ACB from either the annual financial and statistical reports our members file with us or from CoBank, ACB’s public disclosure; however, we believe CoBank, ACB is the additional lender, along with CFC and RUS, with significant long-term debt outstanding to rural electric cooperatives.

Rural Electric Lending Market

Most of our rural electric borrowers are non-for-profit, private companies owned by the members they serve. As such, there is limited publicly available information to accurately determine the overall size of the rural electric lending market. We utilize the annual financial and statistical reports submitted to us by our members to estimate the overall size of the rural electric lending market. The substantial majority of our members have a fiscal year-end that corresponds with the calendar year-end. Therefore, the annual information we use to estimate the size of the rural electric market is typically based on the calendar year-end rather than CFC’s fiscal year-end.

Based on financial data submitted to us by our electric utility members, we present the long-term debt outstanding to CFC by member class, RUS and other lenders in the electric cooperative industry as of December 31, 2021 and 2020 in the table below. The data presented as of December 31, 2021, were based on information reported by 812 distribution systems and 47 power supply systems. The data presented as of December 31, 2020, were based on information reported by 811 distribution systems and 52 power supply systems.
11


December 31,
20212020
(Dollars in thousands)Debt
Outstanding
% of TotalDebt
Outstanding
% of Total
Total long-term debt reported by members:(1)
  
Distribution$54,909,778 $52,274,309 
Power supply39,789,348 44,830,704 
Less: Long-term debt funded by RUS(41,511,338)(39,660,041)
Members’ non-RUS long-term debt$53,187,788 $57,444,972 
Funding sources of members’ long-term debt:
Long-term debt funded by CFC by member class:
Distribution$21,287,049 40 %$20,382,616 36 %
Power supply4,791,465 9 4,723,956 
Long-term debt funded by CFC26,078,514 49 25,106,572 44 
Long-term debt funded by other lenders27,109,274 51 32,338,400 56 
Members’ non-RUS long-term debt$53,187,788 100 %$57,444,972 100 %
____________________________
(1) Reported amounts are based on member-provided financial information, which may not have been subject to audit by an independent accounting firm.

While we believe our estimates of the overall size of the rural electric lending market serve as a useful tool in gauging the size of this lending sector, they should be viewed as estimates rather than precise measures as there are certain limitations in our estimation methodology, including, but not limited to, the following:

Although certain underlying data included in the financial and statistical reports provided to us by members may have been audited by an independent accounting firm, our accumulation of the data from these reports has not been subject to a review for accuracy by an independent accounting firm.
The data presented is not necessarily inclusive of all members because in some cases our receipt of annual member financial and statistical reports may be delayed and not received in a timely manner to incorporate into our market estimates.
The financial and statistical reports submitted by members include information on indebtedness to RUS, but the reports do not include comprehensive data on indebtedness to other lenders and are not on a consolidated basis.

REGULATION


General

CFC, NCSC and RTFC are not subject to direct federal regulatory oversight or supervision with regard to lending. CFC, NCSC and RTFC are subject to state and local jurisdiction commercial lending and tax laws that pertain to business conducted in each state, including but not limited to lending laws, usury laws and laws governing mortgages. These state and local laws regulate the manner in which we make loans and conduct other types of transactions. The statutes, regulations and policies to which the companies are subject may change at any time. In addition, the interpretation and application by regulators of the laws and regulations to which we are subject may change from time to time. Certain of our contractual arrangements, such as those pertaining to funding obtained through the Guaranteed Underwriter Program, provide for the Federal Financing Bank and RUS to periodically review and assess CFC’s compliance with program terms and conditions.


Derivatives Regulation


CFC engages in over-the-counter (“OTC”) derivative transactions, primarily interest rate swaps, to managehedge interest rate risk. As an end user of derivative financial instruments, CFC is subject to regulations that apply to derivatives generally. The Dodd-Frank Act (“DFA”), enacted July 2010, resulted in, among other things, comprehensive regulation of the over-the-counter (“OTC”) OTC
12


derivatives market. The DFA provides for an extensive framework for the regulation of OTC derivatives, including mandatory clearing, exchange


trading and transaction reporting of certain OTC derivatives. Subsequent to the enactment of the DFA, the U.S. CommoditiesCommodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) issued a final rule, “Clearing Exemption for Certain Swaps Entered into by Cooperatives,” which created an exemption from mandatory clearing for cooperatives. The CFTC’s final rule, “Margin Requirements for Uncleared Swaps for Swap Dealers and Major Swap Participants,” includes an exemption from margin requirements for uncleared swaps for cooperatives that are financial end users. CFC is an exempt cooperative end user of derivative financial instruments and does not participate in the derivatives markets for speculative, trading or investing purposes and does not make a market in derivatives.

MEMBERSHUMAN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT


CFC’s success in providing industry expertise and responsive service to meet the needs of our members across the U.S. is dependent on the quality of service provided by our employees and their relationships with our members. We therefore strive to align our human capital management strategy with our member-focused mission and core values of service, integrity and excellence. Our consolidated membership, after taking into consideration entitiesobjectives are (i) to attract, develop and retain a highly qualified workforce with diverse backgrounds and experience in multiple areas whose skills and strengths are consistent with CFC’s mission, and (ii) to create an engaged, inclusive and collaborative work culture, both of which we believe are critical to deliver exceptional service to our members.

Governance of Human Capital

CFC’s executive leadership team and board of directors work together to provide oversight on most human capital matters. The compensation committee of the board of directors meets quarterly to review updates to our compensation programs including our salary structure, incentive plans and executive compensation. Our board is provided with periodic updates on succession planning efforts, current human capital management risks and mitigation efforts in addition to any other matters that affect our ability to attract, develop and maintain the talent needed to execute on our corporate objectives.

Recruiting and Retaining Talent

As a financial services organization, our recruitment goal is to attract and retain a highly skilled workforce in a highly competitive talent market. We strive to provide both external candidates and internal employees who are membersseeking a different role with challenging and stimulating career opportunities ranging from entry-level to management and executive positions.

We use a variety of bothmethods to attract highly talented and engaged professionals, including outreach to local universities, recruitment job boards including sites focusing on diversity, a referral bonus program and targeted industry-related job posting sites. When appropriate, we engage with recruiting firms to ensure that we have surveyed a broad scope of active and passive candidates for certain critical positions. We strive to ensure that our employment value proposition presented to candidates accurately reflects the features of working for a mission-driven cooperative like CFC so that we can attract individuals who are highly engaged with our vision to be our members’ most trusted financial resource.

Because much of our business operations involves significant member-facing interaction with a relatively stable base of long-standing member borrowers, we place a priority on the retention of high-performing employees who have extensive, in-depth experience serving the needs of our members. In the prior four fiscal years, our voluntary turnover rate has remained at or below 10%; however, in fiscal year 2022 it substantially increased to 19%. Multiple factors including the COVID-19 pandemic, competition in the labor market, as well as increased CFC staff retirements contributed to the staff turnover increase. Our total turnover remains lower than the average annual financial industry sector separation rates reported by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Retirements represented 37% of the departures from CFC in fiscal year 2022, which is a 7% increase over last year. We welcomed 55 new hires this fiscal year and NCSC and eliminating memberships between CFC, NCSC and RTFC, totaled 1,447employed 259 staff members and 222 associates as of May 31, 2019.2022, all of which were located in the U.S. The majority of our workforce is located in our headquarters in Dulles, Virginia.


CFCCFC’s organizational structure has experienced significant changes this fiscal year resulting from the appointment of a new chief executive officer in May 2021 and subsequent changes to the executive team composition. Four senior vice president positions were filled through promotions and one was an external hire. This change in the executive level has also resulted

13


CFC’s bylaws provide that cooperativein many new opportunities for advancement at other levels within the organization. Of the positions filled by promotion or nonprofit corporations, public corporations, utility districtsexternal hire this fiscal year, 43% were through internal promotions.

Employee Engagement and other public bodies that received or are eligibleDevelopment

As part of our efforts to receive a loan or commitment for a loan from RUS or any successor agency (aspromote an engaged, inclusive and collaborative workplace culture, we encourage employees to expand their capabilities and enhance their career potential through employer-funded onsite training, external training, tuition assistance and professional events. In fiscal year 2022, CFC employees completed more than 3,000 training hours through our internal corporate training as well as subsidiaries, federations or statewidethrough our support of employees’ enrollment in external professional training opportunities. We seek to tailor our training programs to evolving events and regional associationsemployee interests. Examples of training programs offered in the reporting period include Developing Resilience—Balancing Work and Life, Developing Your Leadership Potential, Advanced Leadership Skills, professional and technical topics, and mental health awareness workshops to promote employee well-being. CFC also supports employee development though a company-sponsored Toastmasters chapter, guest speakers from cooperative partners and, when feasible, staff trips to local electric cooperatives to allow new employees to learn first-hand how their efforts contribute to our members’ success.

Compensation and Benefits Packages

Attracting, developing and retaining high-level talent is a key component of our human capital objectives, so we seek to provide competitive compensation and benefits packages. CFC launched an employee Total Rewards survey this fiscal year to solicit feedback on our Total Rewards components, including compensation, benefits and employee development, to determine which offerings are most valued by our staff. In response to employee feedback and talent market conditions, we have implemented several changes to our compensation programs. Effective June 1, 2022, we transitioned to a base salary range structure, which provides greater flexibility in meeting labor market demands and enhances our ability to differentiate pay based on experience and performance. The salary ranges are structured in zones aligned with median market pay for the positions in each zone. We have increased our fiscal year 2023 merit increase budget in order to retain and attract exceptional staff in a highly competitive talent market.

We have also made prospective changes to our incentive compensation program. The short-term and long-term incentive programs will be replaced by a single annual incentive bonus plan in fiscal year 2023. These changes were initiated based on feedback received in our employee Total Rewards survey that are wholly owned or controlled by such entities) are eligible for membership. Oneour current incentive plans did not adequately differentiate pay based on performance and were not achieving the intended purpose of promoting long-term retention and alignment with company performance that employees could directly influence. The new annual incentive plan is based on attainment of our targeted corporate scorecard goals as established at the beginning of each fiscal year and individual performance ratings from our annual review process. Attainment of the criteria for eligibility for RUS financing isannual scorecard goals requires the collective engagement and effort of employees across the company, which we believe incentivizes teamwork and fosters a “rural area” test. CFC relies on the definition of “rural” as specified in the Rural Electrification Act, as amended. “Rural” is defined in the Rural Electrification Act as any area other than a city, town or unincorporated area that has a population of less than 20,000, or any area within the service areacollaborative working environment. The addition of a borrower who, atperformance rating component will enable the dateorganization to differentiate a portion of enactmentincentive compensation, which demonstrates the value of the Food, Conservation and Energy Acta high-performance culture on behalf of 2008, had an outstanding RUS electric loan.our members. The definition of “rural” under the act permits an area to be defined as “rural” regardless of the development of such area subsequent to the approval of the outstanding loan. Thus, those entities that received or qualify for financing from RUS are eligible to apply for membership, upon approval of membershipnew annual incentive plan was approved by the CFC Board of Directors,Directions in May 2022 and subsequently to borrow from CFC regardlesswill be in place for fiscal year 2023.

The employee benefits components of whether there is an outstanding loan with RUS. There are no requirements to maintain membership, although the board has the authority to suspend a member under certain circumstances. CFC has not suspended a member to date.

CFC has the following types of members, allour Total Rewards package include vacation and leave programs; health, dental, vision, life and disability insurance coverage; and flexible spending and health savings plans, most of which are not-for-profit entitiesfunded in whole or subsidiaries or affiliatesin part by CFC. We make investments in the future financial security of not-for-profit entities.

Class A – Distribution Systems

Cooperative or nonprofit corporations, public corporations, utility districtsour employees by offering retirement plans that consist of a 401(k) plan with a company match component and other public bodies,an employer-funded defined benefit retirement plan in which received or are eligible to receive a loan or commitment for a loan from RUS or any successor agency, andCFC makes an annual contribution in an amount that are engaged or planningapproximates 18% of each employee’s base salary, which we believe helps in our efforts to engage employees, retain high-performing employees and reduce turnover. We also offer programs and resources intended to promote work-life balance, assist in furnishing utility servicesnavigating life events and improve employee well-being, such as flexible work schedules, remote work options, an employee assistance program, legal insurance and identity theft coverage services.

COVID-19 Response

We continue to theirplace a high priority on the health and safety of our employees, and also ensure that we are able to meet the needs of our members in an effective and patrons for their use as ultimate consumers. Theefficient manner. In July 2021, the majority of our distribution systemstaff returned to work at CFC’s corporate headquarters building, while continuing to adhere to the COVID-19 workplace safety and health standards
14


established by Virginia and guidance provided by the CDC. We have been able to maintain business continuity throughout the pandemic and experienced no pandemic-related employee furloughs or layoffs, providing the highest quality of service and delivering effectively on our member-focused mission. We implemented an updated remote work practice that allows for a hybrid work arrangement, providing for employee flexibility while promoting collaboration and efficiency in serving our members.

Open-Door Communications

CFC maintains a strong focus on our core value of integrity in pursuit of our mission. To promote open communications, we maintain an open-door policy and provide multiple avenues for employees to voice their concerns and offer suggestions. Employees are encouraged to report any issues to their manager, senior vice president, corporate compliance, human resources or our corporate ethics helpline. All new employees receive Code of Conduct & Business Ethics training, and we maintain a practice of annual employee review and training to foster a culture of integrity and accountability.

CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY

For more than half a century, CFC has helped electric cooperatives provide essential services to rural America. Since their creation in the 1930s to bring electricity to rural homes, electric cooperatives have been essential to the economic vitality and quality of life in communities nationwide, including those in persistent poverty counties.

As a value-based, financial services cooperative, CFC is engaged in sustaining our environment across multiple fronts—from our Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (“LEED”) Gold-certified building and 42-acre ecofriendly campus that serves as CFC’s headquarters to the renewable energy projects we’ve helped finance for the electric cooperative network. CFC’s members are consumer-owned electric cooperatives.

Distribution systems are utilities engaged in retail sales of electricitymoving forward with renewable energy adoption, and we continue to residential and commercial consumers in their defined service areas. Such sales are generally on an exclusive basis using the distribution system’ssupport them by funding renewable energy initiatives that will help build out greater renewable infrastructure including substations, wires and related support systems. Distribution systems vary in size from small systems that serve a few thousand customers to large systems that serve more than 200,000 customers. Thus, the amount of loan funding required by different distribution systems varies significantly. Distribution systems may serve customers in more than one state.

Most distribution systems have long-term power purchase contracts with their power supply systems, which are owned and controlled by the member distribution systems. Wholesale power for resale also comes from other sources, including power supply contracts with government agencies, investor-owned utilities and other entities, and, in some cases, the distribution systems own generating facilities.

Class B – Power Supply Systems

Cooperative or nonprofit corporations that are federations of Class A members or of other Class B members, or both, or that are owned and controlled by Class A members or by other Class B members, or both, and that are engaged or planning to


engage in furnishing utility services primarily to Class A members or other Class B members. Our power supply system members are member-owned electric cooperatives.

The power supply systems vary in size from one with thousands of megawatts of power generation capacity to systems that have no generating capacity, which generally operate transmission lines to supply certain distribution systems or manage power supply purchase arrangements for the benefit of their distribution system members. Thus, the amount of loan funding required by different power supply systems varies significantly. Power supply members may serve distribution systems located in more than one state.

The wholesale power supply contracts with their distribution system members permit the power supply system, subject to regulatory approval in certain instances, to establish rates to produce revenue sufficient to cover debt service, to meet the cost of operation and maintenance of all power supply systems and related facilities and to pay the cost of any power and energy purchased for resale.

Class C – Statewide and Regional Associations

Statewide and regional associations that are wholly owned or controlled by Class A members or Class B members, or both, or that are wholly owned subsidiaries of a CFC member, and that do not furnish utility services but supply other forms of service to their members. Certain states have an organization that represents and serves the distribution systems and power supply systems located in the state. Such statewide organizations provide training and legislative, regulatory, media and related services.

Class D – National Associations of Cooperatives

National associations of cooperatives that are Class A, Class B and Class C members, provided said national associations have, at the time of admission to membership in CFC, members domiciled in at least 80% of the states in the United States. National

CFC has developed a Sustainability Bond Framework, which aligns with the Sustainability Bond Guidelines (“SBG”), as administered by the International Capital Markets Association (“ICMA”), under which we can issue sustainability bonds and use the proceeds to finance or refinance projects to enhance access to broadband services and renewable energy projects that will provide positive environmental and social impact in rural America. CFC issued its first sustainability bond in October 2020, the first sustainability bond issued for the electric cooperative industry. Today, CFC is proud to support the electric cooperatives by providing approximately $1,647 million in outstanding loans to support broadband expansion. These efforts have opened new opportunities in many rural communities by providing access to affordable high-speed internet service for the first time.

True to our core values of service, integrity and excellence, CFC continues to help electric cooperatives support the communities that created them, whether it’s through contributions from the CFC Educational Fund or helping them access capital from the USDA’s Rural Electric Cooperative AssociationEconomic Development Loan and Grant (“NRECA”REDL&G”) is our sole Class D member. NRECA provides training, sponsors regional and national meetings, and provides legislative, regulatory, media and related services for nearly all rural electric cooperatives.program, which fosters economic development. Over the past 20 years, CFC has contributed an estimated $203 million to the REDL&G program.


CFC Class A, B, C and D members are eligibleelectric cooperatives operate under seven cooperative principles: open and voluntary membership; democratic member control; members’ economic participation; autonomy and independence; education, training and information; cooperation among cooperatives; and concern for community. Through our “Commitment to vote on matters put to a vote of the membership.

CFC’s membership as of May 31, 2019 consisted of:

842 Class A distribution systems;
67 Class B power supply systems;
64 Class C statewide and regional associations, including NCSC; and
1 Class D national association of cooperatives.

In addition,Excellence” workshops, CFC has associates that are nonprofit groups or entities organizedtrained electric cooperative directors and executive staff on agovernance best practices, including how electric cooperative basis that are owned, controlled or operated by Class A, B, C or D membersleaders should demonstrate principled leadership, financial stewardship, and are engaged in or planeffective governance and management risk oversight.

With these efforts CFC empowers electric cooperatives to engage in furnishing non-electric services primarily for the benefitfulfill their historic mission of the ultimate consumers of CFC members. CFC had 46 associates, including RTFC, as of May 31, 2019. Associates are not eligibleservice and contribute to vote on matters put to a vote of the membership.sustainability efforts.

NCSC

Membership in NCSC includes organizations that are Class A, B or C members of CFC, or eligible for such membership and are approved for membership by the NCSC Board of Directors.

NCSC’s membership consisted of 441 distribution systems, two power supply systems and five statewide associations as of May 31, 2019. All of NCSC’s members also were CFC members. CFC, however, is not a member of NCSC. In addition to members, NCSC had 171 associates as of May 31, 2019. NCSC’s associates may include members of CFC, entities eligible to be members of CFC and for-profit and not-for-profit entities that are owned, controlled or operated by or provide significant benefit to Class A, B and C members of CFC.





RTFC

Membership in RTFC is limited to cooperative corporations, nonprofit corporations, private corporations, public corporations, utility districts and other public bodies that are approved by the RTFC Board of Directors and are actively borrowing or are eligible to borrow from RUS’s traditional infrastructure loan program. These companies must be engaged directly or indirectly in furnishing telephone services as the licensed incumbent carrier. Holding companies, subsidiaries and other organizations that are owned, controlled or operated by members are referred to as affiliates, and are eligible to borrow from RTFC. Associates are organizations that provide non-telephone or non-telecommunications services to rural telecommunications companies that are approved by the RTFC Board of Directors. Neither affiliates nor associates are eligible to vote at meetings of the members.

RTFC’s membership consisted of 474 members as of May 31, 2019. RTFC also had six associates as of May 31, 2019. CFC is not a member of RTFC.

The business affairs of CFC, NCSC and RTFC are governed by separate boards of directors for each entity. We provide additional information on CFC’s corporate governance in “Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.”

15


TAX STATUSAVAILABLE INFORMATION

In 1969, CFC obtained a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service recognizing CFC’s exemption from the payment of federal income taxes as an organization described under Section 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code. In order for CFC to maintain its exemption under Section 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code, CFC must be “not organized for profit” and must be “operated exclusively for the promotion of social welfare” within the meaning of that section of the tax code. The Internal Revenue Service determined that CFC is an organization that is “operated exclusively for the promotion of social welfare” because the ultimate beneficiaries of its lending activities, like those of the RUS loan program, are the consumers of electricity produced by rural electric systems, the communities served by these systems and the nation as a whole.

As an organization described under Section 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code, no part of CFC’s net earnings can inure to the benefit of any private shareholder or individual. This requirement is referred to as the private inurement prohibition and was added to Section 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code in 1996. A legislative exception allows organizations like CFC to continue to make allocations of net earnings to members in accordance with its cooperative status.

CFC believes its operations have not changed materially from those described to the Internal Revenue Service in its exemption filing. CFC reviews the impact on operations of any new activity or potential change in product offerings or business in general to determine whether such change in activity or operations would be inconsistent with its status as an organization described under Section 501(c)(4).

NCSC is a taxable cooperative that pays income tax based on its taxable income and deductions.

RTFC is a taxable cooperative under Subchapter T of the Internal Revenue Code and is not subject to income taxes on income from patronage sources that is allocated to its borrowers, as long as the allocation is properly noticed and at least 20% of the amount allocated is retired in cash prior to filing the applicable tax return. RTFC pays income tax based on its taxable income and deductions, excluding amounts allocated to its borrowers.
ALLOCATION AND RETIREMENT OF PATRONAGE CAPITAL

District of Columbia cooperative law requires cooperatives to allocate net earnings to patrons, to a general reserve in an amount sufficient to maintain a balance of at least 50% of paid-up capital and to a cooperative educational fund, as well as permits additional allocations to board-approved reserves. District of Columbia cooperative law also requires that a cooperative’s net earnings be allocated to all patrons in proportion to their individual patronage and each patron’s allocation be distributed to the patron unless the patron agrees that the cooperative may retain its share as additional capital.



CFC

Annually, the CFC Board of Directors allocates its net earnings to its patrons in the form of patronage capital, to a cooperative educational fund, to a general reserve, if necessary, and to other board-approved reserves. Net earnings are calculated by adjusting net income to exclude the noncash effects of the accounting for derivative financial instruments. Net losses, if any, are not allocated to board approved reserves or members and do not affect amounts previously allocated as patronage capital or to the reserves. Net earnings are first applied against prior-period losses, if any, before an allocation of patronage capital is made. CFC has never experienced an adjusted net loss.

An allocation to the general reserve is made, if necessary, to maintain the balance of the general reserve at 50% of the membership fees collected. CFC’s bylaws require the allocation to the cooperative educational fund to be at least 0.25% of its net earnings. Funds from the cooperative educational fund are disbursed annually to statewide cooperative organizations to fund the teaching of cooperative principles and for other cooperative education programs.

Currently, CFC has one additional board-approved reserve, the members’ capital reserve. The CFC Board of Directors determines the amount of net earnings that is allocated to the members’ capital reserve, if any. The members’ capital reserve represents net earnings that CFC holds to increase equity retention. The net earnings held in the members’ capital reserve have not been specifically allocated to members, but may be allocated to individual members in the future as patronage capital if authorized by the CFC Board of Directors.
All remaining net earnings are allocated to CFC’s members in the form of patronage capital. The amount of net earnings allocated to each member is based on the member’s patronage of CFC’s lending programs during the year. No interest is earned by members on allocated patronage capital. There is no effect on CFC’s total equity as a result of allocating net earnings to members in the form of patronage capital or to board-approved reserves. The CFC Board of Directors has voted annually on whether or not to retire a portion of the patronage capital allocation. Upon retirement, patronage capital is paid out in cash to the members to which it was allocated. CFC’s total equity is reduced by the amount of patronage capital retired to its members and by amounts disbursed from board-approved reserves.
Pursuant to CFC’s bylaws, the CFC Board of Directors determines the method, basis, priority and order of retirement of amounts allocated. The current policy of the CFC Board of Directors is to retire 50% of the prior fiscal year’s allocated net earnings following the end of each fiscal year and to hold the remaining 50% for 25 years to fund operations. The amount and timing of future retirements remains subject to annual approval by the CFC Board of Directors, and may be affected by CFC’s financial condition and other factors. The CFC Board of Directors has the authority to change the current practice for allocating and retiring net earnings at any time, subject to applicable cooperative law.

NCSC

In accordance with District of Columbia cooperative law and its bylaws and board policies, NCSC allocates its net earnings to a cooperative educational fund, to a general reserve, if necessary, and to other board-approved reserves. Net earnings are calculated by adjusting net income to exclude the noncash effects of the accounting for derivative financial instruments. Net losses, if any, are not allocated to board-approved reserves and do not affect amounts previously allocated to the reserves.

Pursuant to NCSC’s bylaws, the NCSC Board of Directors shall determine the method, basis, priority and order of amounts allocated. An allocation to the general reserve is made, if necessary, to maintain the balance of the general reserve at 50% of the membership fees collected. There is no effect on NCSC's total equity due to the allocation of net earnings to board-approved reserves. NCSC’s bylaws require the allocation to the cooperative educational fund to be at least 0.25% of its net earnings. Funds from the cooperative educational fund are disbursed annually to fund the teaching of cooperative principles and for other cooperative education programs.

RTFC

In accordance with District of Columbia cooperative law and its bylaws and board policies, RTFC allocates its net earnings to its patrons, a cooperative educational fund and a general reserve, if necessary. Net losses are not allocated to members and do not affect amounts previously allocated as patronage capital or to the reserves. Current period earnings are first applied against any prior year losses before allocating patronage capital.


Pursuant to RTFC’s bylaws, the RTFC Board of Directors shall determine the method, basis, priority and order of retirement of amounts allocated. RTFC’s bylaws require that it allocate at least 1% of net earnings to a cooperative educational fund. Funds from the cooperative educational fund are disbursed annually to fund the teaching of cooperative principles and for other cooperative education programs. An allocation to the general reserve is made, if necessary, to maintain the balance of the general reserve at 50% of the membership fees collected. The remainder is allocated to borrowers in proportion to their patronage. RTFC provides notice to its members of the amount allocated and retires 20% of the allocation for that year in cash prior to the filing of the applicable tax return. Any additional amounts are retired as determined by the RTFC Board of Directors with due regard for RTFC’s financial condition. There is no effect on RTFC's total equity due to the allocation of net earnings to members or board-approved reserves. The retirement of amounts previously allocated to members or amounts disbursed from board-approved reserves reduces RTFC's total equity.
EMPLOYEES

We had 257 employees as of May 31, 2019. We believe that our relations with our employees are good.
AVAILABLE INFORMATION


Our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to these reports, are available for free at www.nrucfc.coop as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with or furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). These reports also are available for free on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Information posted on our website is not incorporated by reference into this Form 10-K.


Item 1A.Risk Factors

Item 1A.    Risk Factors

Our financial condition, results of operations and liquidity are subject to various risks and uncertainties, some of which are inherent in the financial services industry and others of which are more specific to our own business. If anyThe discussion below addresses the most significant risks, of the events or circumstances described in the following risks actually occur,which we are currently aware, that could have a material adverse impact on our business, liquidity, financial condition, or results of operations could be adversely affected. The risks described below are the risks we consider to be material to our business. Otheror liquidity. However, other risks and uncertainties, including those not currently known to us, could also negatively impact our business, financial condition, results of operations and financial condition.liquidity. Therefore, the following should not be considered a complete discussion of all the risks and uncertainties we may face. For information on how we manage our key risks, see “Item 7. MD&A—Enterprise Risk Management.” You should consider the following risks together with all of the other information in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.report.

RISK FACTORS


Credit Risks

We are subject to credit risk that borrowers may not be able to meet their contractual obligations in accordance with agreed-upon terms, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and liquidity. Because we lend primarily to U.S. rural electric utility systems, we also are inherently subject to single-industry and single-obligor concentration risks.
As a lender, our primary credit risk arises from the extension of credit to borrowers. Our loan portfolio, which represents the largest component of assets on our balance sheet, accounts for the substantial majority of our credit risk exposure. Loans outstanding to electric utility organizations represented approximately 98% of our total loans outstanding as of May 31, 2022. We had 883 borrowers with loans outstanding as of May 31, 2022, and our 20 largest borrowers accounted for 21% of total loans outstanding as of May 31, 2022. The largest total exposure to a single borrower or controlled group represented less than 2% of total loans outstanding as of May 31, 2022. Texas historically has had the largest number of borrowers with loans outstanding and the largest loan concentration in any one state. Loans outstanding to Texas borrowers represented 17% of total loans outstanding as of May 31, 2022.

We face the risk that the principal of, or interest on, a loan will not be paid on a timely basis or at all or that the value of any underlying collateral securing a loan will be insufficient to cover our outstanding exposure. A deterioration in the financial condition of a borrower or underlying collateral could impair the ability of a borrower to repay a loan or our ability to recover unpaid amounts from the underlying collateral. We maintain an internal borrower risk rating system in which we assign a rating to each borrower and credit facility that are intended to reflect the ability of a borrower to repay its obligations and assess the probability of default and loss given default. The borrower risk rating system comprises both quantitative metrics and qualitative considerations. Each component is risk weighted in accordance with its importance. Unforeseen events and developments that affect specific borrowers or that occur in a region where we have a high concentration of credit risk may result in risk rating downgrades. Such an event may result in an increase in the allowance for credit losses; delinquent, nonperforming and criticized loans; net charge-offs; and an increase in our credit risk.

We establish an allowance for credit losses based on management’s current estimate of credit losses that are expected to occur over the remaining life of the loans in our portfolio. Because the process for determining our allowance for credit losses requires informed judgments about the ability of borrowers to repay their loans, we identify the estimation of our allowance for credit losses as a critical accounting estimate. Our borrower risk ratings are a key input in establishing our allowance for credit losses. Therefore, the deterioration in the financial condition of a borrower may result in a significant increase in our allowance for credit losses and provision for credit losses and may have a material adverse impact on our results of operations, financial condition and liquidity. In addition, we might underestimate expected credit losses and have
16


credit losses in excess of the established allowance for credit losses if we fail to timely identify a deterioration in a borrower’s financial condition or due to other factors, such as if the methodology and process we use in assigning borrower risk ratings and making judgments in extending credit to our borrowers does not accurately capture the level of our credit risk exposure or our historical loss experience proves to be not indicative of our expected future losses.

Adverse changes, developments or uncertainties in the rural electric utility industry could adversely impact the operations or financial performance of our member electric cooperatives, which, in turn, could have an adverse impact on our financial results.
Our focus as a member-owned finance cooperative is on lending to our rural member electric utility cooperatives, which is the primary source of our revenue. As a result of lending primarily to our members, we have a loan portfolio with single-industry concentration. Loans to rural electric utility cooperatives accounted for approximately 98% of our total loans outstanding as of May 31, 2022. While we historically have experienced limited defaults and very low credit losses in our electric utility loan portfolio, factors that may have a negative impact on the operations of our member rural electric cooperatives include but are not limited to, the price and availability of distributed energy resources, regulatory or compliance factors related to managing greenhouse gas emissions (including the potential for stranded assets) and extreme weather conditions, including weather conditions related to climate change. The factors listed above, individually or in combination, could result in declining sales or increased power supply and operating costs and could potentially cause a deterioration in the financial performance of our members and the value of the collateral securing their loans. This could impair their ability to repay us in accordance with the terms of their loans. In such case, it may lead to risk rating downgrades, which may result in an increase in our allowance for credit losses and a decrease in our net income.

The threat of weather-related events or shifts in climate patterns resulting from climate change, including, but not limited to, increases in storm intensity, number of intense storms and temperature extremes in areas in which our member rural electric cooperatives operate, could result in increased power supply and operating costs, adversely impacting our members’ results of operations, liquidity and ability to make payments to us. While we believe our members would largely be reimbursed by Federal Emergency Management Agency (“FEMA”) relief programs for storm-related damages, such programs may not be implemented as currently constructed or payments may not be received on a timely basis. For increased power costs, although we believe our members have the ability to pass through increased costs to their members, in some cases it may be difficult to pass through the entire costs on a timely basis if they are significant. To the extent CFC makes bridge loans to members as they wait for FEMA payments, changes to FEMA programs or delays in payments from FEMA could adversely impact the quality of our loan portfolio and our financial condition. Additionally, our member rural electric cooperatives are subject to evolving local, state and federal laws, regulations and expectations regarding the environment. These requirements and expectations may increase the time and costs of efforts to monitor and comply with such obligations and expose them to liability. The impacts of climate change present notable risks, including damage to the assets of our members, which could adversely impact the quality of our loan portfolio and our financial condition.

Advances in technology may change the way electricity is generated and transmitted, which could adversely affect the business operations of our members and negatively impact the credit quality of our loan portfolio and financial results.
Advances in technology could reduce demand for power supply systems and distribution services. The development of alternative technologies that produce electricity, including solar cells, wind power and microturbines, has expanded and could ultimately provide affordable alternative sources of electricity and permit end users to adopt distributed generation systems that would allow them to generate electricity for their own use. As these and other technologies, including energy conservation measures, are created, developed and improved, the quantity and frequency of electricity usage by rural customers could decline. Advances in technology and conservation that cause our electric system members’ power supply, transmission and/or distribution facilities to become obsolete prior to the maturity of loans secured by these assets could have an adverse impact on the ability of our members to repay such loans, which could result in an increase in nonperforming or restructured loans. These conditions could negatively impact the credit quality of our loan portfolio and financial results.

We may obtain entities or other assets through foreclosure, which would subject us to the same performance and financial risks as any other owner or operator of similar businesses or assets.
As a financial institution, from time to time we may obtain entities and assets of borrowers in default through foreclosure proceedings. If we become the owner and operator of entities or assets obtained through foreclosure, we are subject to the same performance and financial risks as any other owner or operator of similar assets or entities. In particular, the value of
17


the foreclosed assets or entities may deteriorate and have a negative impact on our results of operations. We assess foreclosed assets, if any, for impairment periodically as required under generally accepted accounting principles in the U.S. (“U.S. GAAP.”) Impairment charges, if required, represent a reduction to earnings in the period of the charge. There may be substantial judgment used in the determination of whether such assets are impaired and in the calculation of the amount of the impairment. In addition, when foreclosed assets are sold to a third party, the sale price we receive may be below the amount previously recorded in our financial statements, which will result in a loss being recorded in the period of the sale.

The nonperformance of our derivative counterparties could impair our financial results.
We use interest rate swaps to manage our interest rate risk. There is a risk that the counterparties to these agreements will not perform as agreed, which could adversely affect our results of operations. The nonperformance of a counterparty on an agreement would result in the derivative no longer being an effective risk-management tool, which could negatively affect our overall interest rate risk position. In addition, if a counterparty fails to perform on our derivative obligation, we could incur a financial loss to replace the derivative with another counterparty and/or a loss through the failure of the counterparty to pay us amounts owed. We were in a net receivable position for all of our interest rate swaps, after taking into consideration master netting agreements, of $94 million as of May 31, 2022.

A decline in our credit rating could trigger payments under our derivative agreements, which could impair our financial results.
We have certain interest rate swaps that contain credit risk-related contingent features referred to as rating triggers. Under certain rating triggers, if the credit rating for either counterparty falls to the level specified in the agreement, the other counterparty may, but is not obligated to, terminate the agreement. If either counterparty terminates the agreement, a net payment may be due from one counterparty to the other based on the prevailing fair value, excluding credit risk, of the underlying derivative instrument. These rating triggers are based on our senior unsecured credit ratings by Moody’s Investors Service (“Moody’s”) and S&P Global Inc. (“S&P”). Based on our interest rate swap agreements subject to rating triggers, if all agreements for which we owe amounts were terminated as of May 31, 2022 and our senior unsecured ratings fell below Baa2 by Moody’s or below BBB by S&P, we were in a net receivable position of up $56 million as of that date. In addition, if our senior unsecured ratings fell below Baa3 by Moody’s, below BBB- by S&P or below BBB- by Fitch Ratings Inc. (“Fitch”), we would have been due a payment from the swap counterparty of up to $13 million as of that date. In calculating the required payments, we only consider agreements that, when netted for each counterparty pursuant to a master netting agreement, would require a payment upon termination. In the event that we are required to make a payment as a result of a rating trigger, it could have a material adverse impact on our financial results.

Liquidity Risks

If we are unable to access the capital markets or other external sources for funding, our liquidity position may be negatively affected and we may not have sufficient funds to meet all of our financial obligations as they become due.
We depend on access to the capital markets and other sources of financing, such as our investment portfolio, repurchase agreements, bank revolving credit agreements, investments from our members, private debt issuances through Farmer Mac and through the Guaranteed Underwriter Program, to fund new loan advances and refinance our long- and short-term debt and, if necessary, to fulfill our obligations under our guarantee and repurchase agreements. MarketProlonged market disruptions, downgrades to our long-term and/or short-term debt ratings, adverse changes in our business or performance, downturns in the electric industry and other events over which we have no control may deny or limit our access to the capital markets and/or subject us to higher costs for such funding. Our access to other sources of funding also could be limited by the same factors, by adverse changes in the business or performance of our members, by the banks committed to our revolving credit agreements or Farmer Mac, or by changes in federal law or the Guaranteed Underwriter Program. Our funding needs are determined primarily by scheduled short- and long-term debt maturities and the amount of our loan advances to our borrowers relative to the scheduled payment amortization of loans previously made by us. If we are unable to timely issue debt into the capital markets or obtain funding from other sources, we may not have the funds to meet all of our obligations as they become due.


A reduction in the credit ratings for our debt could adversely affect our liquidity and/or cost of debt.
Our credit ratings are important to maintaining our liquidity position. We currently contract with three nationally recognized statistical rating organizations to receive ratings for our secured and unsecured debt and our commercial paper. In order to
18


access the commercial paper markets at current levels, we believe that we need to maintain our short-term ratings at the current ratings for commercial paper of P-1level from Moody’s, Investors Service (“Moody’s”), A-1 from S&P Global Inc. (“S&P”) and F1 from


Fitch Ratings Inc. (“Fitch”).Fitch. Changes in rating agencies’ rating methodology, actions by governmental entities or others, losses from impaired loansdeterioration in the credit quality of our loan portfolios, increased leverage and other factors could adversely affect the credit ratings on our debt. A reduction in our credit ratings could adversely affect our liquidity, and competitive position, increase our borrowing costs or limit our access to the capital markets and the sources of financing available to us. A significant increase in our cost of borrowings and interest expense could cause us to sustain losses or impairimpact our liquidity by requiring us to seek other sources of financing, which may be difficult to obtain.competitive position within the industry.


Our ability to maintain compliance with the covenants related to our revolving credit agreements, collateral trust bond and medium-term note indentures and debt agreements could affect our ability to retire patronage capital, result in the acceleration of the repayment of certain debt obligations, adversely impact our credit ratings and hinder our ability to obtain financing.
We must maintain compliance with all covenants and conditions related to our revolving credit agreements and debt indentures. We are required to maintain a minimum average adjusted times interest earned ratio (“adjusted TIER”) for the six most recent fiscal quarters of 1.025 and an adjusted leverage ratio of no more than 10-to-1. In addition, we must maintain loans pledged as collateral for various debt issuances at or below 150% of the related secured debt outstanding as a condition to borrowing under our revolving credit agreements. If we were unable to borrow under the revolving credit agreements, our short-term debt ratings would likely decline, and our ability to issue commercial paper could become significantly impaired. Our revolving credit agreements also require that we earn a minimum annual adjusted TIER of 1.05 in order to retire patronage capital to members. See “Item 7. MD&A—Non-GAAP Financial Measures” for additional information on our adjusted measures and a reconciliation to the most comparable U.S. GAAP measures.


PursuantPursuant to our collateral trust bond indentures, we are required to maintain eligible pledged collateral at least equal to 100% of the principal amount of the bonds issued under the indenture. Pursuant to one of our collateral trust bond indentures and our medium-term note indenture, we are required to limit senior indebtedness to 20 times the sum of our members’ equity, subordinated deferrable debt and members’ subordinated certificates. If we were in default under our collateral trust bond or medium-term note indentures, the existing holders of these securities have the right to accelerate the repayment of the full amount of the outstanding debt of the security before the stated maturity of such debt. That acceleration of debt repayments poses a significant liquidity risk, as we might not have enough cash or committed credit available to repay the debt. In addition, if we are not in compliance with the collateral trust bond and medium-term note covenants, we would be unable to issue new debt securities under such indentures. If we were unable to issue new collateral trust bonds and medium-term notes, our ability to fund new loan advances and refinance maturing debt would be impaired.


We are required to pledge eligible distribution system or power supply system loans as collateral equal to at least 100% of the outstanding balance of debt issued under a revolving note purchase agreement with Farmer Mac. We also are required to pledge distribution or power supply loans as collateral equal to at least 100% of the outstanding balance of debt under the Guaranteed Underwriter Program. Collateral coverage less than 100% for either of these debt programs constitutes an event of default, which if not cured within 30 days, could result in creditors accelerating the repayment of the outstanding debt principal before the stated maturity. An acceleration of the repayment of debt could pose a liquidity risk if we had insufficient cash or committed credit available to repay the debt. In addition, we would be unable to issue new debt securities under the applicable debt agreement, which could impair our ability to fund new loan advances and refinance maturing debt.


Market Risks

Changes in the level and direction of interest rates or our ability to successfully manage interest rate risk could adversely affect our financial results and condition.
Our earnings are largely dependent on net interest income. Our interest rate risk exposure is primarily related to the funding of a fixed-rate loan portfolio. We have a matched funding objective that is intended to manage the funding of asset and liability repricing terms within a range of total assets based on the current environment and extended outlook for interest rates. We maintain a limited unmatched position, or interest rate gap, on our fixed-rate assets within a targeted range of adjusted total assets to provide us with funding flexibility.

Our primary strategies for managing interest rate risk include the use of derivatives and limitingin order to manage the amounttiming of interest rate gapcash flows between fixed-rateinterest-earning assets and fixed-rate liabilities to a specified percentage of total assets based on prevailing market conditions.interest-bearing liabilities. We face the risk that changes in interest rates could reduce our net interest income and our earnings, especially if actual conditions turn out to be materially different than those we assumed.earnings. Fluctuations in interest rates, including changes


in the relationship between short-term rates and long-term rates may affect the pricing of loans to borrowers and our cost of funds, which could adversely affect the difference between the interest that we earn on assets and the interest we pay on liabilities used to fund assets. Such changes may also affect our abilityresult in increased costs to hedge various forms of market andexisting interest rate risk, andwhich may decrease the effectiveness of those hedges in helping to manage such risks, which could cause our interest rate gap to exceed our targeted range and have an adverse impact on the net interest income, earnings and cash flows. See “Item 7. MD&A—Market Risk” for additional information.


19


The uncertainty as to the nature of potential changes or other reforms in the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) benchmark interest rate may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
We have loans, derivative contracts, debt securities and other financial instruments with attributes that are either directly or indirectly dependent on the LIBOR. In 2017, the United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”), which regulates LIBOR, announced that the FCA intends to stop persuading or compelling banks to submit the rates required to calculate LIBOR after December 31, 2021. This announcement indicatesIn March 2021, the FCA and the Intercontinental Exchange (“ICE”) Benchmark Administration, the administrator for LIBOR, concurrently confirmed the intention to stop requesting banks to submit the rates required to calculate LIBOR after December 31, 2021 for one-week and two-month LIBOR and June 30, 2023 for all remaining LIBOR tenors.

The Federal Reserve-sponsored Alternative Reference Rates Committee (“ARRC”) has recommended the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) as an alternative to U.S. dollar LIBOR. SOFR is a measure of the cost of borrowing cash overnight, collateralized by U.S. Treasury securities, and is based on directly observable U.S. Treasury-based repurchase transactions. In the fiscal quarter ended November 30, 2021 (the “second quarter of fiscal year 2022,”) we began entering into transactions that reference SOFR. While the continuation ofARRC has selected SOFR as its recommended alternative to U.S. dollar LIBOR, on the current basis cannot and willother replacement rates may emerge as alternatives. We are not be guaranteed after 2021. Consequently, at this time, it is not possibleable to predict whether and to what extent bankshow SOFR or an alternate rate will continue to provide submissions for the calculation of LIBOR. Similarly, it is not possible to predict whether LIBOR will continue to be viewed as an acceptable market benchmark, what rate or rates may become accepted alternativesperform in comparison to LIBOR orin response to changing market conditions, what the effect of any such changes in views or alternativesrate’s implementation may be on the markets for LIBOR-indexedfloating-rate financial instruments. instruments or whether such rates will be vulnerable to manipulation. Further, the transition from LIBOR to an alternative reference rate has required changes to risk and pricing models, valuation tools, product design, information technology systems, operational processes and controls and hedging strategies, and may result in or require further changes in the future.

The replacement of LIBOR creates operational and market risks which will become clear as replacement choices are developed.risks. We will continue to assess all of our contracts and financial instruments, including loans that we service, that are directly or indirectly dependent on LIBOR to determine thewhat impact the replacement of LIBOR will have on us. Uncertainty as to the nature of such potential changes or other reforms may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

We are subject to credit risk that a borrower or other counterparty may not be able to meet its contractual obligations in accordance with agreed-upon terms, which could result in significantly higher, unexpected losses.Operations and Business Risks
Our loan portfolio, which represents the largest component of assets on our balance sheet, accounts for the substantial majority of exposure to credit risk. We had total loans outstanding of $25,906 million as of May 31, 2019. We reserve for credit losses in our loan portfolio by establishing an allowance for loan losses through a provision charge to earnings. The amount of the allowance for loan losses, which was $18 million as of May 31, 2019, is based on our assessment of credit losses inherent in our loan portfolio as of each balance sheet date, taking into consideration management's continuing evaluation of credit risk related to: industry concentrations; macro-economic conditions; specific credit risks; loan loss experience; current loan portfolio quality; present political and regulatory conditions; and unidentified losses and risks inherent in the current loan portfolio. We consider the process for determining the amount of the allowance as one of our critical accounting policies because it involves significant judgments and assumptions about highly complex and inherently uncertain matters, and the use of reasonably different estimates and assumptions could have a material impact on our results of operations or financial condition. Management believes that the allowance for loan losses appropriately reflects credit losses inherent in our loan portfolio as of May 31, 2019. However, our actual credit losses could exceed our estimate of probable losses due to changes in economic conditions that adversely affect borrowers, new information regarding existing loans, identification of additional problem loans and other factors, both within and outside of our control. In those cases, we may be required to increase the allowance for loan losses through an increase in the provision for loan losses, which would reduce net income and may have a material adverse effect on our financial results.

Adverse changes, developments or uncertainties in the rural electric utility industry could adversely impact the operations or financial performance of our member electric cooperatives, which, in turn, could have an adverse impact on our financial results.
Our focus as a tax-exempt, member-owned finance cooperative is on lending to our rural member electric utility cooperatives, which is the primary source of our revenue. As a result of lending primarily to our members, we have a loan portfolio with single-industry concentration. Loans to rural electric utility cooperatives accounted for approximately 99% of our total loans outstanding as of May 31, 2019. While we historically have experienced limited defaults and very low credit losses in our electric utility loan portfolio, factors that have a negative impact on the operations of our member rural electric cooperatives, including but not limited to, the price and availability of alternative energy sources and weather conditions, such as hurricanes, tornados or other weather-related events, could cause a deterioration in their financial performance and the value of the collateral securing their loans, which could impair their ability to repay us in accordance with the terms of their loans. In such case, it may be necessary to increase our allowance for loan losses, which would result in an increase in the provision for loan losses and a decrease in our net income.


We may obtain entities or other assets through foreclosure, which would subject us to the same performance and financial risks as any other owner or operator of similar businesses or assets.
As a financial institution, from time to time we may obtain entities and assets of borrowers in default through foreclosure proceedings. If we become the owner and operator of entities or assets obtained through foreclosure, we are subject to the same performance and financial risks as any other owner or operator of similar assets or entities. In particular, the value of the foreclosed assets or entities may deteriorate and have a negative impact on our results of operations. We assess foreclosed assets, if any, for impairment periodically as required under generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”). Impairment charges, if required, represent a reduction to earnings in the period of the charge. There may be substantial judgment used in the determination of whether such assets are impaired and in the calculation of the amount of the impairment. In addition, when foreclosed assets are sold to a third party, the sale price we receive may be below the amount previously recorded in our financial statements, which will result in a loss being recorded in the period of the sale.

The nonperformance of our derivative counterparties could impair our financial results.
We use interest rate swaps to manage our interest rate risk. There is a risk that the counterparties to these agreements will not perform as agreed, which could adversely affect our results of operations. The nonperformance of a counterparty on an agreement would result in the derivative no longer being an effective risk management tool, which could negatively affect our overall interest rate risk position. In addition, if a counterparty fails to perform on our derivative obligation, we could incur a financial loss to replace the derivative with another counterparty and/or a loss through the failure of the counterparty to pay us amounts owed. We were in a net payable position for all of our interest rate swaps, after taking into consideration master netting agreements, of $351 million as of May 31, 2019.

A decline in our credit rating could trigger payments under our derivative agreements, which could impair our financial results.
We have certain interest rate swaps that contain credit risk-related contingent features referred to as rating triggers. Under certain rating triggers, if the credit rating for either counterparty falls to the level specified in the agreement, the other counterparty may, but is not obligated to, terminate the agreement. If either counterparty terminates the agreement, a net payment may be due from one counterparty to the other based on the prevailing fair value, excluding credit risk, of the underlying derivative instrument. These rating triggers are based on our senior unsecured credit ratings by Moody’s and S&P. Based on our interest rate swap agreements subject to rating triggers, if all agreements for which we owe amounts were terminated as of May 31, 2019 and our senior unsecured ratings fell below Baa3 by Moody’s or below BBB- by S&P, we would have been required to make a payment of up to $253 million as of that date. In addition, if our senior unsecured ratings fell below Baa3 by Moody’s, below BBB- by S&P or below BBB- by Fitch, we would have been required to make a payment of up to $20 million as of that date. In calculating the required payments, we only considered agreements that, when netted for each counterparty pursuant to a master netting agreement, would require a payment upon termination. In the event that we are required to make a payment as a result of a rating trigger, it could have a material adverse impact on our financial results.

Advances in technology may change the way electricity is generated and transmitted, which could adversely affect the business operations of our members and negatively impact the credit quality of our loan portfolio and financial results.
Advances in technology could reduce demand for power supply systems and distribution services. The development of alternative technologies that produce electricity, including solar cells, wind power and microturbines, has expanded and could ultimately provide affordable alternative sources of electricity and permit end users to adopt distributed generation systems that would allow them to generate electricity for their own use. As these and other technologies, including energy conservation measures, are created, developed and improved, the quantity and frequency of electricity usage by rural customers could decline. Advances in technology and conservation that cause our electric system members’ power supply, transmission and/or distribution facilities to become obsolete prior to the maturity of loans secured by these assets could have an adverse impact on the ability of our members to repay such loans, which could result in an increase in nonperforming or restructured loans. These conditions could negatively impact the credit quality of our loan portfolio and financial results.





Breaches of our information technology systems, or those managed by third parties, may damage relationships with our members or subject us to reputational, financial, legal or operational consequences.
Cyber-related attacks pose a risk to the security of our members’ strategic business information and the confidentiality and integrity of our data, which includesinclude strategic and proprietary information. Security breaches may occur through the actions of third parties, employee error, malfeasance, technology failures or other irregularities. Any such breach or unauthorized access could result in a loss of this information, a loss of integrity of this information, a delay or inability to provide service of affected products, damage to our reputation, including a loss of confidence in the security of our products and services, and significant legal and financial exposure. Because the techniques used to obtain unauthorized access, disable or degrade service or sabotage systems change frequently, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or implement adequate preventative measures. As a result, cyber-related attacks may remain undetected for an extended period and may be costly to remediate.

Our business depends on the reliable and secure operation of computer systems, network infrastructure and other information technology managed by third parties including, but not limited to:to, our service providers for external storage and processing of our information on cloud-based systems; our consulting and advisory firms and contractors that have access to our confidential and proprietary data; and administrators for our employee payroll and benefits management. We have limited control and visibility over third-party systems that we rely on for our business. The occurrence of a cyber-related attack, breach, unauthorized access or other cybersecurity event could result in damage to our third parties’ operations. The failure of third parties to provide services agreed upon through service levelservice-level agreements, whether as a result of the occurrence of a cyber-related attack or other event, could result in the loss of access to our data, the loss of integrity of our data, disruptions to our corporate functions, loss of business opportunities or reputational damage, or otherwise adversely impact our financial results and result incause significant costs and liabilities.


While CFC maintains insurance coverage that, subject to policy terms and conditions, covers certain aspects of cyber risks, including business interruptions caused by cyber-related attacks on information technology systems managed by third
20


parties, such insurance coverage may be insufficient to cover all losses. Our failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations regarding data security and privacy could result in fines, sanctions and litigation. Additionally, new regulation in the areas of data security and privacy may increase our costs and our members’ costs.

Loss of our tax-exempt status could adversely affect our earnings.
CFC has been recognized by the Internal Revenue Service as an organization for which income is exempt from federal taxation under Section 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code (other than any net income from an unrelated trade or business). In order to maintain CFC’s tax-exempt status, it must continue to operate exclusively for the promotion of social welfare by operating on a cooperative basis for the benefit of its members by providing them cost-based financial products and services consistent with sound financial management, and no part of CFC’s netearnings may inure to the benefit of any private shareholder or individual other than the allocation or return of net earnings or capital to its members in accordance with CFC’s bylaws and incorporating statute in effect in 1996.

If CFC were to lose its status as a 501(c)(4) organization, it would become a taxable cooperative and would be required to pay income tax based on its taxable income. If this event occurred, we would evaluate all options available to modify CFC’s structure and/or operations to minimize any potential tax liability.

As a tax-exempt cooperative and nonbank financial institution, our lending activities are not subject to the regulations and oversight of U.S. financial regulators such as the Federal Reserve, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or the Office of Comptroller of Currency. Because we are not under the purview of such regulation, we could engage in activities that could expose us to greater credit, market and liquidity risk, reduce our safety and soundness and adversely affect our financial results.
Financial institutions subject to regulations, oversight and monitoring by U.S. financial regulators are required to maintain specified levels of capital and may be restricted from engaging in certain lending-related and other activities that could adversely affect the safety and soundness of the financial institution or are considered conflicts of interest. As a tax-exempt, nonbank financial institution, we are not subject to the same oversight and supervision. There is no federal financial regulator that monitors compliance with our risk policies and practices or that identifies and addresses potential deficiencies that could adversely affect our financial results. Without regulatory oversight and monitoring, there is a greater potential for us to engage in activities that could pose a risk to our safety and soundness relative to regulated financial institutions.


Competition from other lenders could adversely impact our financial results.
We compete with other lenders for the portion of the rural utility loan demand for which RUS will not lend and for loans to members that have elected not to borrow from RUS. The primary competition for the non-RUS loan volume is from CoBank, ACB, a federally chartered instrumentality of the United States that is a member of the Farm Credit System. As a government-sponsored enterprise, CoBank, ACB has the benefit of an implied government guarantee with respect to its funding. Competition may limit our ability to raise rates to adequately cover increases in costs, which could have an adverse impact on our results of operations, and increasing interest rates to cover costs could cause a reduction in new lending business.


Our elected directors also serve as officers or directors of certain of our individual member cooperatives, which may result in a potential conflict of interest with respect to loans, guarantees and extensions of credit that we may make to or on behalf of such member cooperatives.
In accordance with our charter documents and the purpose for which we were formed, we lend only to our members and associates. CFC’s directors are elected or appointed from our membership, with 10 director positions filled by directors of members, 10 director positions filled by general managers or chief executive officers of members, two positions appointed by NRECA and one at-large position that must, among other things, be a director, financial officer, general manager or chief executive of one of our members. CFC currently has loans outstanding to members that are affiliated with CFC directors and may periodically extend new loans to such members. The relationship of CFC’s directors to our members may give rise to conflicts of interests from time to time. See “Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence—Review and Approval of Transactions with Related Persons” for a description of our policies with regard to approval of loans to members affiliated with CFC directors.


Natural or man-made disasters, including widespread health emergencies such as the COVID-19 pandemic, or other external events beyond our control such as the invasion of Ukraine by Russia, could disrupt our business and adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Item 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments


Our operations may be subject to disruption due to the occurrence of natural disasters, acts of terrorism or war, such as the invasion of Ukraine by Russia, public health emergencies, such as the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, or other unexpected or disastrous conditions, events or emergencies beyond our control, some of which may be intensified by the effects of a government response to the event, or climate change and changing weather patterns.

COVID-19 resulted in the declaration of the COVID-19 outbreak as a pandemic by the World Health Organization and caused significant economic and financial turmoil both in the U.S. and around the world. Although the global economy has begun to recover from the COVID-19 pandemic and most health and safety restrictions have been lifted, the extent to which the consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic impact us will depend on future developments that remain uncertain and cannot be predicted including, but not limited to, the severity and duration of any resurgence of COVID-19 variants and future actions taken by governmental authorities to contain COVID-19 and mitigate its effects.

The growth in economic activity that resulted from the lifting of COVID-19 health and safety restrictions, combined with labor shortages and supply chain complications exacerbated by the invasion of Ukraine by Russia and subsequent sanctions and export controls against Russia, has contributed to rising inflationary pressures. General inflation in the United States has risen to levels not experienced in recent decades. The rising energy prices, interest rates and wages, among other things, may increase our operating costs as well as both the operating and borrowing costs of our members and disrupt our business.

Although we have implemented a business continuity management program that we enhance on an ongoing basis, there can be no assurance that the program will adequately mitigate the risks of business disruptions. Further, events such as natural disasters and public health emergencies may divert our attention away from normal operations and limit necessary resources. We generally must resume operations promptly following any interruption. If we were to suffer a disruption or interruption and were not able to resume normal operations within a period consistent with industry standards, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be adversely affected in a material manner. In addition, depending on the nature and duration of the disruption or interruption, we might become vulnerable to fraud, additional expense or other losses, or to a loss of business.

Competition from other lenders could adversely impact our financial results.
We compete with other lenders for the portion of the rural utility loan demand for which RUS will not lend and for loans to members that have elected not to borrow from RUS. The primary competition for the non-RUS loan volume is from CoBank, ACB, a federally chartered instrumentality of the U.S. that is a member of the Farm Credit System. As a government-sponsored enterprise, CoBank, ACB has the benefit of an implied government guarantee with respect to its funding. Competition may limit our ability to raise rates to adequately cover increases in costs, which could have an adverse
21


impact on our results of operations, and increasing interest rates to cover costs could cause a reduction in new lending business.

The failure to attract, retain or motivate highly skilled and qualified employees could impair our ability to successfully execute our strategic plan and otherwise adversely affect our business.

We rely on our employees’ depth of knowledge of CFC and its related industries to run our business operations successfully. Because much of our business operations involve significant member-facing interaction with a relatively stable base of long-standing member borrowers, we place a priority on the retention of high-performing employees with extensive experience in the rural utility industry. Retirements represented 37% of the departures from CFC in fiscal year 2022, an increase of 7% over fiscal year 2021, and CFC experienced a higher than usual 19% rate of voluntary turnover during fiscal year 2022. Our ability to implement our strategic plan and our future success depends on our ability to attract, retain and motivate highly skilled and qualified employees. The failure to attract or retain, including due to retirement, or replace a sufficient number of appropriately skilled and key employees could place us at a significant competitive disadvantage and prevent us from successfully implementing our strategy. Further, the marketplace for skilled employees is becoming more competitive, which means the cost of hiring, incentivizing and retaining skilled employees may continue to increase. The failure to attract, retain or motivate skilled employees, along with the increased costs, could impair our ability to achieve our performance targets and otherwise have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Regulatory and Compliance Risks

Loss of our tax-exempt status could adversely affect our earnings.
CFC has been recognized by the IRS as an organization for which income is exempt from federal taxation under Section 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code (other than any net income from an unrelated trade or business). In order to maintain CFC’s tax-exempt status, it must continue to operate exclusively for the promotion of social welfare by operating on a cooperative basis for the benefit of its members by providing them cost-based financial products and services consistent with sound financial management, and no part of CFC’s net earnings may inure to the benefit of any private shareholder or individual other than the allocation or return of net earnings or capital to its members in accordance with CFC’s bylaws and incorporating statute in effect in 1996.

If CFC were to lose its status as a 501(c)(4) organization, it would become a taxable cooperative and would be required to pay income tax based on its taxable income. If this event occurred, we would evaluate all options available to modify CFC’s structure and/or operations to minimize any potential tax liability.

As a tax-exempt cooperative and nonbank financial institution, our lending activities are not subject to the regulations and oversight of U.S. financial regulators such as the Federal Reserve, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or the Office of Comptroller of Currency. Because we are not under the purview of such regulation, we could engage in activities that could expose us to greater credit, market and liquidity risk, reduce our safety and soundness and adversely affect our financial results.
Financial institutions subject to regulations, oversight and monitoring by U.S. financial regulators are required to maintain specified levels of capital and may be restricted from engaging in certain lending-related and other activities that could adversely affect the safety and soundness of the financial institution or are considered conflicts of interest. As a tax-exempt, nonbank financial institution, we are not subject to the same oversight and supervision. There is no federal financial regulator that monitors compliance with our risk policies and practices or that identifies and addresses potential deficiencies that could adversely affect our financial results. Without regulatory oversight and monitoring, there is a greater potential for us to engage in activities that could pose a risk to our safety and soundness relative to regulated financial institutions.

Changes in accounting standards or assumptions in applying accounting policies could materially impact our financial statements.
Our accounting policies and methods are fundamental to how we record and report our financial condition and results of operations. Some of these policies require the use of estimates and assumptions that may affect the reported carrying amount of our assets or liabilities and our results of operations. We consider the accounting policies that require management to make difficult, subjective and complex judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain as our most critical accounting
22


estimates. The use of reasonably different estimates and assumptions could have a material impact on our financial statements or if the assumptions, estimates or judgments were incorrectly made, we could be required to correct and restate prior-period financial statements. In addition, from time to time, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) and the SEC change the accounting and reporting standards that govern the preparation of our financial statements. These changes can be hard to predict and can materially impact how CFC records and reports its financial condition and results of operations. We could be required to apply a new or revised standard retroactively or apply an existing standard differently, on a retroactive basis, in each case potentially resulting in restating prior-period financial statements. For information on what we consider to be our most critical accounting estimates and recent accounting changes, see “Item 7. MD&A—Critical Accounting Estimates” and “Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies—New Accounting Standards” to our consolidated financial statements.

Item 1B.    Unresolved Staff Comments

None.


Item 2.Properties

Item 2.    Properties

CFC owns an office building, with approximately 141,000 gross square footage, in Loudoun County, Virginia, that serves as its headquarters in Loudoun County, Virginia.headquarters.


Item 3.Legal Proceedings

Item 3.    Legal Proceedings

From time to time, CFC is subject to certain legal proceedings and claims in the ordinary course of business, including litigation with borrowers related to enforcement or collection actions. Management presently believes that the ultimate outcome of these proceedings, individually and in the aggregate, will not materially harm our financial position, liquidity or results of operations. CFC establishes reserves for specific legal matters when it determines that the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome is probable and the loss is reasonably estimable. Accordingly, no reserve has been recorded with respect to any legal proceedings at this time.


Item 4.    Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

PART II

Item 5.    Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Not applicable.

Item 6.    Reserved

23


Item 7.    Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”)

Item 4.Mine Safety DisclosuresINTRODUCTION

Not applicable.

Our financial statements include the consolidated accounts of CFC, NCSC, RTFC and any subsidiaries created and controlled by CFC to hold foreclosed assets resulting from defaulted loans or bankruptcy. CFC and its consolidated entities have not held any foreclosed assets since the fiscal year ended May 31, 2017 (“fiscal year 2017”). We provide information on the business structure, mission, principal purpose and core business activities of each of these entities under “Item 1. Business.” Unless stated otherwise, references to “we,” “our” or “us” relate to CFC and its consolidated entities.

PART IIWe conduct our operations through three business segments, which are based on each of the legal entities included in our consolidated financial statements: CFC, NCSC and RTFC. CFC’s business segment has historically accounted for the substantial majority of our consolidated loans and total revenue. Consolidated loans to members totaled $30,063 million as of May 31, 2022, of which 96% was attributable to CFC. We generated consolidated total revenue, which consists of consolidated net interest income and consolidated fee and other income, of $453 million for fiscal year ended May 31, 2022 (“fiscal year 2022”), of which 99% was attributable to CFC. In comparison, we generated consolidated total revenue of $433 million for fiscal year ended May 31, 2021 (“fiscal year 2021”), of which 99% was attributable to CFC. We provide additional financial information on the financial performance of our business segments in “Note 16—Business Segments.”


The following MD&A is intended to enhance the understanding of our consolidated financial statements by providing material information that we believe is relevant in evaluating our results of operations, financial condition and liquidity and the potential impact of material known events or uncertainties that, based on management’s assessment, are reasonably likely to cause the financial information included in this Report not to be necessarily indicative of our future financial performance. Management monitors a variety of key indicators and metrics to evaluate our business performance. We discuss these key measures and factors influencing changes from period to period. Our MD&A is provided as a supplement to, and should be read in conjunction with, our audited consolidated financial statements and related notes for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2022 included in this Report and additional information contained elsewhere in this Report, including the risk factors discussed under “Item 1A. Risk Factors.”

Item 5.Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity SecuritiesSUMMARY OF SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

Not applicable.


Item 6. Selected Financial Data

The following table provides a summary of consolidated selected financial data for the fiscal five-year period ended
May 31, 2019. In addition to financial measures determined in accordanceconformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”), management also evaluates performance based on certain non-GAAP measures and metrics, which we refer to as “adjusted” measures. Certain financial covenant provisions in our credit agreements are also based on non-GAAP financial measures. Our key non-GAAP financial measures are adjusted net income, adjusted net interest income, adjusted interest expense, adjusted net interest yield, adjusted times interest earned ratio (“adjusted TIER”) and adjusted debt-to-equity ratio. The most comparable U.S. GAAP measures are net income, net interest income, interest expense, net interest yield, TIER and debt-to-equity ratio, respectively. The primary adjustments we make to calculate these non-GAAP measures consist of (i) adjusting interest expense and net interest income to include the impact of net periodic derivative cash settlements expense;expense amounts; (ii) adjusting net income, senior debttotal liabilities and total equity to exclude the non-cash impact of the accounting for derivative financial instruments; (iii) adjusting senior debttotal liabilities to exclude the amount that funds CFC member loans guaranteed by RUS, subordinated deferrable debt and members’ subordinated certificates; and (iv) adjusting total equity to include subordinated deferrable debt and members’ subordinated certificates and exclude cumulative derivative forward value gains and losses and accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”).

We believe our non-GAAP adjusted measures, which areshould not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for GAAP and may not be consistentmeasures determined in conformity with similarly titled non-GAAP measures used by other companies,U.S. GAAP, provide meaningful information and are useful to investors because management evaluates performance based on these metrics for purposes of (i) establishing short- and long-term performance goals; (ii) budgeting and forecasting; (iii) comparing period-to-period operating results, analyzing changes in results and identifying potential trends; and (iv) making compensation decisions. In addition, certain of the financial covenants in our committed bank revolving line of credit agreements and debt indentures are based on non-GAAP adjusted measures. See “Item 7. MD&A—Non-GAAP Financial Measures” formeasures, as the forward fair value gains and losses related to our interest rate swaps that are excluded from our non-GAAP measures do not
24


affect our cash flows, liquidity or ability to service our debt. Our non-GAAP adjusted measures may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies due to differences in the way that these measures are calculated.
We provide a detailed reconciliation of theseour non-GAAP adjusted measures to the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measures.measures in the section “Non-GAAP Financial Measures.”


Five-YearTable 1 provides a summary of selected financial data and key metrics used by management in evaluating performance for each fiscal year in the five-year period ended May 31, 2022.


















































25


Table 1: Summary of Selected Financial Data(1)
Change
Year Ended May 31,2022 vs.2021 vs.
(Dollars in thousands)20222021202020192018 20212020
Statements of operations
Net interest income:
Interest income$1,141,243 $1,116,601 $1,151,286 $1,135,670 $1,077,357 2 %(3)%
Interest expense(705,534)    (702,063)    (821,089)    (836,209)    (792,735) (14)
Net interest income435,709414,538330,197299,461284,6225 26 
Fee and other income    17,193     18,929     22,961     15,355     17,578 (9)(18)
Total revenue    452,902     433,467     353,158     314,816     302,200 4 23 
Benefit (provision) for credit losses17,972 (28,507)(35,590)    1,266     18,575 **(20)
Derivative gains (losses):
Derivative cash settlements interest expense(2)
    (101,385)    (115,645)    (55,873)    (43,611)    (74,281)(12)107 
Derivative forward value gains (losses)(3)
    557,867     621,946     (734,278)    (319,730)    306,002 (10)**
Derivative gains (losses)    456,482     506,301     (790,151)    (363,341)    231,721 (10)**
Other non-interest income (loss)(30,179)1,495 9,431     (1,799)    — **(84)
Operating expenses(4)
(95,186)(94,705)(101,167)    (93,166)    (90,884)1 (6)
Other non-interest expense(2,306)(3,075)(26,271)    (8,775)    (1,943)(25)(88)
Income (loss) before income taxes    799,685     814,976     (590,590)    (150,999)    459,669 (2)**
Income tax benefit (provision)    (1,148)(998)1,160     (211)    (2,305)15 **
Net income (loss)$   798,537 $   813,978 $   (589,430)$   (151,210)$   457,364 (2)**
Adjusted statement of operations measures
Interest income$1,141,243 $1,116,601 $1,151,286 $1,135,670 $1,077,357 2 %(3)%
Interest expense    (705,534)    (702,063)    (821,089)    (836,209)    (792,735) (14)
Include: Derivative cash settlements interest expense(2)
    (101,385)    (115,645)    (55,873)    (43,611)    (74,281)(12)107 
Adjusted interest expense(5)
    (806,919)(817,708)(876,962)(879,820)(867,016)(1)(7)
Adjusted net interest income(5)
$   334,324 $   298,893 $   274,324 $   255,850 $   210,341 12 
Net income (loss)$798,537 $813,978 $(589,430)$(151,210)$457,364 (2)**
Exclude: Derivative forward value gains (losses)(3)
    557,867     621,946     (734,278)    (319,730)    306,002 (10)**
Adjusted net income(5)
$   240,670 $   192,032 $   144,848 $   168,520 $   151,362 25 33 
Profitability ratios
Times interest earned ratio (TIER)(6)
2.13 2.16 0.28 0.82 1.58 (1)%671 %
Adjusted TIER(5)
1.30 1.23 1.17 1.19 1.17 6 
Net interest yield(7)
1.46 %1.47 %1.21 %1.14 %1.12 %(1)bps26 bps
Adjusted net interest yield(5)(8)
1.12 1.06 1.00 0.97 0.83 6 
Credit quality ratios
Net charge-off rate(9)
— — — — —  — 

26


  Year Ended May 31, Change
(Dollars in thousands) 2019
2018
2017
2016
2015 2019 vs. 2018 2018 vs. 2017
Statement of operations              
Interest income $1,135,670
 $1,077,357
 $1,036,634
 $1,012,636
 $952,976
    5%    4%
Interest expense (836,209) (792,735) (741,738) (681,850) (635,684) 5 7
Net interest income 299,461
 284,622

294,896

330,786

317,292
 5 (3)
Fee and other income 15,355
 17,578
 19,713
 21,785
 36,783
 (13) (11)
Total revenue 314,816
 302,200
 314,609
 352,571
 354,075
 4 (4)
Benefit (provision) for loan losses 1,266
 18,575
 (5,978) 646
 21,954
 (93) **
Derivative gains (losses)(2)
 (363,341) 231,721
 94,903
 (309,841) (196,999) ** 144
Results of operations of foreclosed assets 
 
 (1,749) (6,899) (120,148)  **
Unrealized losses on equity securities (1,799) 
 
 
 
 ** 
Operating expenses(3) 
 (93,166) (90,884) (86,226) (86,343) (76,530) 3 5
Other non-interest expense (8,775) (1,943) (1,756) (1,593) (870) 352 11
Income (loss) before income taxes (150,999) 459,669
 313,803
 (51,459) (18,518) ** 46
Income tax benefit (expense) (211) (2,305) (1,704) (57) (409) (91) 35
Net income (loss) $(151,210) $457,364
 $312,099
 $(51,516) $(18,927) ** 47
            
  
Adjusted operational financial measures 

 

 

     
  
Adjusted interest expense(4)
 $(879,820) $(867,016) $(826,216) $(770,608) $(718,590)    1%    5%
Adjusted net interest income(4)
 255,850
 210,341
 210,418
 242,028
 234,386
 22 
Adjusted net income(4)
 168,520
 151,362
 132,718
 169,567
 95,166
 11 14
               
Selected ratios              
Fixed-charge coverage ratio/TIER(5)
 0.82
 1.58
 1.42
 0.92
 0.97
 (76) bps 16 bps
Adjusted TIER(4)
 1.19
 1.17
 1.16
 1.22
 1.13
 2 1
Net interest yield(6)
 1.14% 1.12% 1.20% 1.43 % 1.47% 2 (8)
Adjusted net interest yield(4)(7)
 0.97
 0.83
 0.86
 1.05
 1.08
 14 (3)
Net charge-off rate(8)
 0.00
 0.00
 0.01
 0.00
 0.00
 0 (1)
Change
Year Ended May 31,20222021
(Dollars in thousands)20222021202020192018vs. 2021vs. 2020
Balance sheet
Assets:
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash$161,114 $303,361 $680,019 $186,204 $238,824 (47)%(55)%
Investment securities599,904 611,277 370,135 652,977 609,851 (2)65 
Loans to members(10)
30,063,386 28,426,961 26,702,380 25,916,904 25,178,608 6 
Allowance for credit losses(11)
(67,560)(85,532)(53,125)(17,535)(18,801)(21)61 
Loans to members, net29,995,826 28,341,429 26,649,255 25,899,369 25,159,807 6 
Total assets31,251,382 29,638,363 28,157,605 27,124,372 26,690,204 5 
Liabilities and equity:
Short-term borrowings4,981,167 4,582,096 3,961,985 3,607,726 3,795,910 9 16 
Long-term debt21,545,440 20,603,123 19,712,024 19,210,793 18,714,960 5 
Subordinated deferrable debt986,518 986,315 986,119 986,020 742,410  — 
Members’ subordinated certificates1,234,161 1,254,660 1,339,618 1,357,129 1,379,982 (2)(6)
Total debt outstanding28,747,286 27,426,194 25,999,746 25,161,668 24,633,262 5 
Total liabilities29,109,413 28,238,484 27,508,783 25,820,490 25,184,351 3 
Total equity2,141,969 1,399,879 648,822 1,303,882 1,505,853 53 116 
Adjusted balance sheet measures
Adjusted total liabilities(5)
$26,629,324 $25,273,384 $23,777,823 $22,931,626 $22,625,162 5 %%
Adjusted total equity(5)
4,270,476 4,106,172 4,061,411 3,999,164 3,661,239 4 
Members’ equity(5)
2,019,952 1,836,135 1,707,770 1,626,847 1,496,620 10 

Debt ratios
Debt-to-equity ratio(12)
13.5920.1742.4019.8016.72(33)%(52)%
Adjusted debt-to-equity ratio(5)
6.246.155.855.736.181 
Liquidity coverage ratio(13)
0.990.991.171.321.09 (15)
Credit quality ratios
Nonperforming loans ratio(14)
0.76 %0.84 %0.63 %— %— %(8)bps21 bps
Criticized loans ratio(15)
1.65 3.12 1.39 0.78 0.71 (147)173  
Allowance coverage ratio(16)
0.22 0.30 0.20 0.07 0.07 (8)10 
               
  Year Ended May 31, Change
(Dollars in thousands) 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2019 vs. 2018 2018 vs. 2017
Balance sheet              
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash $186,204
 $238,824
 $188,421
 $209,168
 $249,321
    (22)%    27%
Investment securities 652,977
 609,851
 92,554
 87,940
 84,472
 7 559
Loans to members(9)
 25,916,904
 25,178,608
 24,367,044
 23,162,696
 21,469,017
 3 3
Allowance for loan losses (17,535) (18,801) (37,376) (33,258) (33,690) (7) (50)
Loans to members, net 25,899,369
 25,159,807

24,329,668

23,129,438

21,435,327
 3 3
Total assets 27,124,372
 26,690,204
 25,205,692
 24,270,200
 22,846,059
 2 6
Short-term borrowings 3,607,726
 3,795,910
 3,342,900
 2,938,848
 3,127,754
 (5) 14
Long-term debt 19,210,793
 18,714,960
 17,955,594
 17,473,603
 16,244,794
 3 4
Subordinated deferrable debt 986,020
 742,410
 742,274
 742,212
 395,699
 33 
Members’ subordinated certificates 1,357,129
 1,379,982
 1,419,025
 1,443,810
 1,505,420
 (2) (3)
Total debt outstanding 25,161,668
 24,633,262
 23,459,793
 22,598,473
 21,273,667
 2 5
Total liabilities 25,820,490
 25,184,351
 24,106,887
 23,452,822
 21,934,273
 3 4
Total equity 1,303,882
 1,505,853
 1,098,805
 817,378
 911,786
 (13) 37
Guarantees(10)
 837,435
 805,161
 889,617
 909,208
 986,500
 4 (9)
               
Selected ratios period end              
Allowance coverage ratio(11)
 0.07% 0.07% 0.15% 0.14 % 0.16%  (8) bps
Debt-to-equity ratio(12)
 19.80
 16.72
 21.94
 28.69
 24.06
 308 (522)
Adjusted debt-to-equity ratio(4)
 5.73
 6.18
 5.95
 5.82
 6.26
 (45) 23
____________________________
**Calculation of percentage change is not meaningful.
(1)Certain reclassifications may have been made to prior periodsfor prior-periods to conform to the current periodcurrent-period presentation.
(2)Consists of net periodic contractual interest amounts on our interest rate swapswaps, which we refer to as derivatives cash settlements expense andinterest expense.
(3)Consists of derivative forward value gains (losses). Derivative cash settlement amounts represent net periodic contractual interest accruals related to derivatives not designated for hedge accounting. Derivative forward value gains (losses), which represent changes in fair value during the period, excluding net periodic contractual interest accruals, relatedsettlement amounts, attributable to derivatives not designated for hedge accounting and expense amounts reclassified into income related to the cumulative transition loss recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income on June 1, 2001, as a resultaccounting.
(4)Consists of the adoption of the derivative accounting guidance that required derivatives to be reported at fair value on the balance sheet.
(3)Consists oftotal non-interest expense components (i) salaries and employee benefits and the(ii) other general and administrative expenses, components of non-interest expense, each of which areis presented separately on ourthe consolidated statements of operations.
(4)(5)See “Item 7. MD&A—Non-GAAP“Non-GAAP Financial Measures” for detailsa description of each of our non-GAAP measures and additional detail on the calculationreconciliation of thesethe non-GAAP adjusted measures and the reconciliationpresented in this Report to the most comparable U.S. GAAP measures.measure.
(5)Calculated(6)Calculated based on net income (loss) plus interest expense for the period divided by interest expense for the period. The fixed-charge coverage ratios and TIER were the same during each period presented because we did not have any capitalized interest during these periods.
(6)(7)Calculated based on net interest income for the period divided by average interest-earning assets for the period.
(7)(8)Calculated based on adjusted net interest income for the period divided by average interest-earning assets for the period.
(8)(9)Calculated based on net charge-offs (recoveries) for the period divided by average total loans outstanding loans for the period.
(9)(10)Consists of the outstandingunpaid principal balance of member loans plus unamortized deferred loan origination costs which totaledof $12 million as of both May 31, 2022 and 2021, and $11 million as of May 31, 2020, 2019,, 2018 and 2017, and $10 million2018.
(11)On June 1, 2020, we adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-13, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, which replaces the incurred loss methodology previously used for estimating our allowance for credit losses
27


with an expected loss methodology referred to as the current expected credit loss (“CECL”) model. Our allowance for credit losses prior to June 1, 2020 was determined based on the incurred loss methodology.
(12)Calculated based on total liabilities at period-end divided by total equity at period-end.
(13)Calculated based on available liquidity at period-end divided by the amount of maturing debt obligations over the next 12 months at period-end as of both May 31, 2016each respective date.
(14)Calculated based on total nonperforming loans at period-end divided by total loans outstanding at period-end.
(15)Calculated based on loans outstanding at period-end to borrowers with a risk rating that falls within the criticized risk rating category, which consists of special mention, substandard and 2015.doubtful, divided by total loans outstanding at period-end.
(10)Reflects the total amount of member obligations for which CFC has guaranteed payment to a third party as of the end of each period. This amount represents our maximum exposure to loss, which significantly exceeds the guarantee liability recorded on our consolidated balance sheets. See “Note 13—Guarantees” for additional information.
(11)(16)Calculated based on the allowance for loancredit losses at period endperiod-end divided by total loans outstanding loans at period end.period-end.
(12)Calculated based on total liabilities at period end divided by total equity at period end.



Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”)

INTRODUCTIONEXECUTIVE SUMMARY


Our financial statements include the consolidated accounts of CFC, NCSC, RTFC and any subsidiaries created and controlled by CFC to hold foreclosed assets resulting from defaulted loans or bankruptcy. CFC did not hold and did not have any subsidiaries or other entities that held foreclosed assets as of either May 31, 2019 or May 31, 2018. See “Item 1. Business—Overview” for information on the business activities of each of these entities. Unless stated otherwise, references to “we,” “our” or “us” relate to CFC and its consolidated entities. All references to members within this document include members, associates and affiliates of CFC and its consolidated entities.

Our principal operations are currently organized for management reporting purposes into three business segments: CFC, NCSC and RTFC. Loans to members totaled $25,917 million as of May 31, 2019, of which 96% was attributable to CFC. We generated total revenue, which consists of net interest income and fee and other income, of $315 million and $302 million for fiscal years ended May 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, of which 99% and 97% were attributable to CFC. We provide information on the financial performance of each ofAs a member-owned, nonprofit finance cooperative, our business segments in “Note 15—Business Segments.”

Management monitors a variety of key indicators to evaluate our business performance. In addition to financial measures determined in accordance with GAAP, management also evaluates performance based on certain non-GAAP measures and metrics, which we refer to as “adjusted” measures. We identify our non-GAAP measures and discuss why these measures are useful in “Item 6. Selected Financial Data.” We provide a reconciliation of our non-GAAP measures to the most comparable GAAP measures below under “Non-GAAP Financial Measures.”

The following MD&A is intended to provide the reader with an understanding of our consolidated results of operations, financial condition and liquidity by discussing the factors influencing changes from period to period and the key measures used by management to evaluate performance, such as net interest income, net interest yield, loan growth, debt-to-equity ratio, credit quality metrics and also non-GAAP measures. The MD&A section is provided as a supplement to, and should be read in conjunction with, our audited consolidated financial statements and related notes in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2019, and the additional information contained elsewhere in this Report, including the risk factors discussed under “Item 1A. Risk Factors.”
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Our primary objective as a member-owned cooperative lender is to provide cost-based financial products to our rural electric utility members with access to affordable, flexible financing products; while also maintaining a sound, stable financial position required forand adequate liquidity to meet our financial obligations and maintain ongoing investment-grade credit ratings on our debt instruments. Our objectiveratings. Because maximizing profit is not our primary objective, the interest rates on lending products offered to maximize net income; therefore, the rates we charge our member-borrowersmember borrowers reflect our funding costs plus a spread to cover our operating expenses a provision for loanand estimated credit losses and generate sufficient earnings sufficient to cover interest owed on our debt obligations and achieve interest coverage to meet ourcertain financial objectives.target goals. Our goal is to earnfinancial goals focus on earning an annual minimum adjusted TIER of 1.10 and to maintainmaintaining an adjusted debt-to-equity ratio at approximately 6.00-to-1 or below 6.00-to-1.below.


We are subject to period-to-period volatility in our reported U.S. GAAP results due to changes in market conditions and differences in the way our financial assets and liabilities are accounted for under U.S. GAAP. Our financial assets and liabilities expose us to interest-rate risk. We use derivatives, primarily interest rate swaps, as part of our strategy in managing this risk. Our derivatives are intended to economically hedge and manage the interest-rate sensitivity mismatch between our financial assets and liabilities. We are required under U.S. GAAP to carry derivatives at fair value on our consolidated balance sheet;sheets; however, the financial assets and liabilities for which we use derivatives to economically hedge are carried at amortized cost. Changes in interest rates and the shape of the yieldswap curve result in periodic fluctuations in the fair value of our derivatives, which may cause volatility in our earnings because we do not apply hedge accounting for our interest rate swaps. As a result, the mark-to-market changes in our interest rate swaps are recorded in earnings. Because our derivative portfolio consists of a higher proportion of pay-fixed swaps, the majority of which are longer dated, than receive-fixed swaps, the majority of which are shorter dated, we generally record derivative losses when interest rates decline and derivative gains when interest rates rise. This earnings volatility generally is not indicative of the underlying economics of our business, as the derivative forward fair value gains or losses recorded each period may or may not be realized over time, depending on the terms of our derivative instruments and future changes in market conditions

that impact the periodic cash settlement amounts of our interest rate swaps. As such,Therefore, as discussed above under “Summary of Selected Financial Data,” management uses our non-GAAP adjusted non-GAAP resultsmeasures to evaluate our operatingfinancial performance. Our adjusted financial results include the realized net periodic contractual interest expense amounts on our interest rate swap settlement amountsswaps but exclude the impact of unrealized forward fair value gains and losses. Our financial debt covenants are also based on our non-GAAP adjusted results, as the forward fair value gains and losses related to our interest rate swaps do not affect our cash flows, liquidity or ability to service our debt.


Financial Performance


Reported Results


We reported a net loss of $151 million for fiscal year ended May 31, 2019 (“fiscal year 2019”), which resulted in a TIER of 0.82. In comparison, we reported net income of $457$799 million and a TIER of 1.582.13 for fiscal year ended May 31, 20182022 (“current fiscal year”), compared with net income of $814 million and TIER of 2.16 for fiscal year 2018”). The significant variance between our reported results for the current fiscal year and the 2021 (“prior fiscal year was primarily attributable to mark-to-market changes in the fair value of our derivative instruments.year”). Our debt-to-equity ratio increaseddecreased to 19.8013.59 as of May 31, 2019,2022, from 16.7220.17 as of May 31, 2018,2021, primarily due to the decreasean increase in equity resulting from our reported net lossincome of $151$799 million for fiscal year 2019 and2022, which was partially offset by a decrease in equity attributable to the CFC Board of Directors’ authorized patronage capital retirement in July 2021 of $48 million$58 million.

The decrease in August 2018.

The variance of $609 million between our reported net lossincome of $151$15 million to $799 million for fiscal year 20192022 from $814 million for fiscal year 2021, was primarily driven by the combined impact of a reduction in derivative gains of $50 million and an unfavorable shift in gains and losses recorded on our investment securities of $32 million, partially offset by a favorable shift in the provision for credit losses of $47 million and an increase in net interest income of $457$21 million. We recorded derivative gains of $456 million for fiscal year 2018 was driven by a shift in derivative fair value changes of $595 million. We recorded derivative losses of $363 million in fiscal year 2019, due to decreases in the fair value of our pay-fixed swaps2022, attributable to a decline in medium and longer-term interest rates during the second half of fiscal year 2019. Short-term interest rates rose and exceeded medium and longer-term interest rates during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2019, which resulted in an inverted yield curve. In comparison, we reported derivative gains of $232 million in fiscal year 2018 due to a riseincreases in interest rates across the entire swap yield curve. Netcurve during the period. In comparison, we recorded derivative gains of $506 million for fiscal year 2021, driven by a pronounced increase in
28


medium- and longer-term swap rates. As noted above, the substantial majority of our swap portfolio consists of longer-dated, pay-fixed swaps. Therefore, increases and decreases in medium- and longer-term swap rates generally have a more pronounced corresponding impact on the change in the net fair value of our swap portfolio. The unfavorable shift in gains and losses recorded on our investment securities was primarily attributable to unrealized losses resulting from period-to-period market fluctuations in fair value.

We recorded a benefit for credit losses of $18 million for fiscal year 2022. In contrast, we recorded a provision for credit losses of $29 million for fiscal year 2021. The benefit for credit losses for fiscal year 2022 was primarily attributable to a decrease in the collective allowance, stemming largely from positive developments during the fiscal quarter ended February 28, 2022 (the “third quarter of fiscal year 2022”) related to Rayburn Country Electric Cooperative, Inc. (“Rayburn”) that resulted in an improvement in Rayburn’s credit risk profile and also a significant reduction in loans outstanding to Rayburn. In June 2021, Texas enacted securitization legislation that offers a financing program for qualifying electric cooperatives exposed to elevated power costs during the February 2021 polar vortex. In February 2022, Rayburn successfully completed a securitization transaction pursuant to this legislation to cover extraordinary costs and expenses incurred during the February 2021 polar vortex. Subsequent to the completion of the securitization transaction, Rayburn fully paid its related outstanding obligations to the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (“ERCOT”). As a result, we revised our borrower risk rating for Rayburn to a rating in the pass category from a previous rating in the criticized category. In addition, we received loan payments from Rayburn during the current fiscal year that reduced our loans outstanding to Rayburn to $167 million as of May 31, 2022, consisting of secured and unsecured loans outstanding of $151 million and $16 million, respectively. Loans outstanding to Rayburn totaled $379 million as of the prior fiscal year-end May 31, 2021, consisting of secured and unsecured loans outstanding of $167 million and $212 million, respectively. The provision for credit losses of $29 million recorded for fiscal year 2021 was attributable to an allowance build due to the significant adverse financial impact on Brazos Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. (“Brazos”) and Rayburn as a result of their exposure to elevated wholesale electric power costs during the February 2021 polar vortex, discussed further below under “Consolidated Results of Operations.”

The increase in net interest income which accounted for 95% and 94% of total revenue for fiscal years 2019 and 2018, respectively, increased $15$21 million, or 5%, to $436 million for fiscal year 2022 was attributable to an increase in average interest-earning assets of $1,629 million, or 6%, partially offset by a decrease in the net interest yield of 1 basis point, or 1%, to 1.46%. The increase in average interest-earning assets was primarily driven by growth in average total loans. The decrease in the net interest yield reflected the combined impact of a decrease in the average yield on interest-earning assets of 13 basis points to 3.82% and a reduction in the benefit from non-interest bearing funding of 1 basis point to 0.17%, which was largely offset by a reduction in our average cost of borrowings of 13 basis points to 2.53%. The decreases in the average yield on interest-earning assets and our average cost of borrowings reflected the impact of the
continued low interest rate environment during the majority of fiscal year 2022.

Non-GAAP Adjusted Results

Adjusted net income totaled $241 million and adjusted TIER was 1.30 for fiscal year 2022, compared with adjusted net income of $192 million and adjusted TIER of 1.23 for fiscal year 2021. The adjusted TIER for both fiscal year 2022 and 2021 was well above our target of 1.10.While our goal is to maintain an adjusted debt-to-equity ratio of approximately 6.00-to-1, the adjusted debt-to-equity ratio of 6.24 and 6.15 as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, was above our targeted goal due to increased borrowings to fund growth in our loan portfolio.

The increase in adjusted net income of $49 million to $241 million for fiscal year 2022, from $192 million for fiscal year 2021, was primarily driven by the combined impact of a favorable shift in our provision for credit losses of $47 million and an increase in adjusted net interest income of $35 million, or 12%, partially offset by an unfavorable shift in gains and losses recorded on our investment securities of $32 million, primarily due to period-to-period market fluctuations in fair value. As discussed above under “ Reported Results,” we recorded a benefit for credit losses of $18 million for fiscal year 2022, primarily due to a reduction in our collective allowance resulting from an improvement in the credit risk profile of Rayburn following payment in full of its obligations to ERCOT upon the successful completion of a securitization transaction in February 2022 to cover extraordinary costs and expenses incurred during the February 2021 polar vortex and a significant reduction in loans outstanding to Rayburn. In contrast, we recorded a provision for credit losses of $29 million for fiscal year 2021 due to the allowance build for loans outstanding to Brazos and Rayburn as discussed above under “Reported Results.”



29


The increase in adjusted net interest income of $35 million, or 12%, to $334 million for fiscal year 2022 was attributable to the combined impact of an increase in the net interest yield of 2 basis points, or 2%, to 1.14%, and an increase in our average interest-earning assets of $942$1,629 million, or 4%. The increase in the net interest yield reflected an increase in the average yield on our interest-earning assets of 7 basis points to 4.31%6%, which was largely offset by an increase in our average cost of funds of 6 basis points to 3.36%, both of which were largelyprimarily due to the increasegrowth in short-term interest rates that resulted in higher average yields on line of creditloans outstanding, and variable-rate loans and a higher average cost on short-term and variable-rate funding. On July 12, 2018, we early redeemed $300 million of the $1 billion aggregate principal amount of 10.375% collateral trust bonds and repaid the remaining $700 million principal amount of these bonds on the maturity date of November 1, 2018. We replaced this high-cost debt with lower-cost funding. While we experienced an overall increase in our average cost of funds during fiscal year 2019, resulting primarily from the increase in the average cost of our short-term and variable-rate funding, the cost savings from the repayment of the 10.375% collateral trust bonds mitigated this increase.

Other factors affecting the variance between our current year results and the prior fiscal year include a loss on the early redemption of the 10.375% collateral trust bonds of $7 million attributable to the premium paid to redeem the bonds and a decrease in the benefit for loan losses of $17 million. The premium paid for the early redemption of the collateral trust bonds was offset by the interest cost savings following the redemption. We recorded a benefit for loan losses of $1 million for fiscal year 2019, compared with a benefit for loan losses of $18 million for fiscal year 2018. The benefit for loan losses of $18 million for fiscal year 2018 was attributable to a reduction in the allowance for loan losses resulting from favorable changes in the loss severity rate, or recovery rate, assumptions used in determining the collective allowance for our electric distribution and power supply loan portfolios.

Adjusted Non-GAAP Results

Our adjusted net income totaled $169 million and our adjusted TIER was 1.19 for fiscal year 2019, compared with adjusted net income of $151 million and adjusted TIER of 1.17 for fiscal year 2018. Our adjusted debt-to-equity ratio decreased to 5.73 as of May 31, 2019, from 6.18 as of May 31, 2018, primarily attributable to an increase in adjusted equity resulting from the issuance of subordinated deferrable debt totaling $250 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2019.

The increase in adjusted net income of $18 million in fiscal year 2019 from fiscal year 2018 was attributable to an increase in adjusted net interest income of $46 million, or 22%, which was partially offset by the reduction in the benefit for loan

losses of $17 million and the loss on the early extinguishment of debt of $7 million. The increase in adjusted net interest income was driven by an increase in the adjusted net interest yield of 146 basis points, or 17%6%, to 0.97%, coupled with the increase in average interest-earning assets of 4%1.12%. The increase in theour adjusted net interest yield reflected the combinedfavorable impact of an increasea reduction in our adjusted average cost of borrowings of 20 basis points to 2.89%, which was partially offset by a decrease in the average yield on interest-earning assets of 713 basis points to 4.31% and a reduction3.82% as the continued low interest rate environment during the majority of fiscal year 2022 contributed to reductions in our adjusted average cost of funds of 7 basis points to 3.54%. This reduction was largely due to the interest savings from the repayment of the $1 billion aggregate principal amount of the 10.375% collateral trust bonds, the replacement of this debt with lower-cost fundingborrowing and a decrease in the net periodic derivative settlement expense amountsaverage yield on our interest rate swaps resulting from higher short-term interest rates, which together more than offset the increase in the average cost of our short-term, variable-rate borrowings resulting from the increase in short-term interest rates.interest-earning assets.


See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” for additional information on our adjusted measures, including a reconciliation of these measures to the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measures.


Lending Activity


Loans to members totaled $25,917$30,063 million as of May 31, 2019,2022, an increase of $738$1,636 million, or 3%6%, from May 31, 2018.2021, reflecting net increases in long-term and line of credit loans of $1,599 million and $37 million, respectively. We experienced increases in CFC distribution loans, CFC statewide and power supplyassociate loans, increased by $603 million and $182 million, respectively, which was partially offset by a decrease in NCSC loans and RTFC loans of $43$1,817 million, $21 million, $4 million and $18 million, respectively. Long-term and line-of-credit revolving loans accounted for $425 million and $313$47 million, respectively, and a decrease in CFC power supply loans of the $738 million increase in loans. Based on our historical experience, however, long-term loans typically account for the substantial majority of loan growth.$253 million.


Long-term loan advances totaled $1,843$3,386 million during fiscal year 2019, with2022, of which approximately 87% of those advances80% was provided to members for capital expenditures byand 18% was provided to members for other expenses, primarily to fund operating expenses attributable to the elevated power cost obligations incurred during the February 2021 polar vortex. In comparison, long-term loan advances totaled $2,514 million during fiscal year 2021, of which approximately 86% was provided to members for capital expenditures and 10%8% was provided for the refinancing of loans made by other lenders. In comparison,Of the $3,386 million total long-term loans advanced during fiscal year 2022, $2,911 million were fixed-rate loan advances with a weighted average fixed-rate term of 23 years.

Many rural electric distribution cooperatives have made or are making infrastructure investments that include building fiber optic lines to improve electric grid system reliability and efficiency, as fiber operations offer enhanced communication to monitor electric systems, identify outages and speed electric restoration. Some of these electric cooperatives are leveraging these fiber assets to offer access to broadband services, either directly or by partnering with local telecommunication companies and others, to the communities they serve. Aggregate loans outstanding to CFC electric distribution cooperative members relating to broadband projects, which we started tracking in October 2017, increased to an estimated $1,647 million as of May 31, 2022, from approximately $854 million as of May 31, 2021. The three states with the largest CFC loans outstanding for broadband projects were Oklahoma, Indiana and Arkansas as of May 31, 2022, and broadband loans outstanding for these states totaled $2,203$205 million, during fiscal year 2018, with approximately 67%$191 million and $155 million, respectively, as of those advancesthis date. Many of these broadband projects are also financially supported by various states and the federal government, which reduces the credit risk for capital expenditures by membersCFC and 24% for the refinancing of loans made by other lenders. The decreaseour electric cooperative members. We expect our member electric cooperatives to continue in long-term loan advances from the same prior-year period primarily resulted from weaker demand from borrowerstheir efforts to refinance other lender debt. CFC had long-term fixed-rate loans totaling $761 million that were scheduledexpand broadband access to reprice during fiscal year 2019. Of this total, $568 million repriced to a new long-term fixed rate; $124 million repriced to a long-term variable rate;unserved and $69 million was repaid in full.underserved communities.


Credit Quality


TheWe believe the overall credit quality of our loan portfolio remained highstrong as of May 31, 2019, as evidenced by our strong credit performance metrics. We had no delinquent or nonperforming loans as of May 31, 2019, and2022. Historically, we have not experienced any charge-offs for two consecutive fiscal years. Outstanding loans to electric utility organizations represented approximately 99% of total outstanding loan portfolio as of May 31, 2019, unchanged from May 31, 2018. We historically have had limited defaults and losses on loans in our electric utility loan portfolio. Weportfolio largely because of the essential nature of the service provided by electric utility cooperatives as well as other factors, such as limited rate regulation and competition, which we discuss further in the section “Credit Risk—Loan Portfolio Credit Risk.” In addition, we generally lend to members on a senior secured basis, which reduces the risk of loss in the event of a borrower default. Loans outstanding to electric utility organizations of $29,584 million and $27,995 million as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, represented approximately 98% and 99% of total loans outstanding as of each respective date. Of our total loans outstanding, 92%93% were secured as of both May 31, 2022 and 8% were unsecured2021.

We had loans to three borrowers totaling $228 million classified as nonperforming as of May 31, 2019, compared with 93% secured and 7% unsecured2022. In comparison we had loans to four borrowers totaling $237 million classified as nonperforming as of May 31, 2018.2021. Nonperforming loans represented 0.76% and 0.84% of total loans outstanding as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The allowance forreduction in nonperforming loans of $9 million during fiscal year 2022 was due in part to our receipt during fiscal year 2022 of full payment of all amounts due on nonperforming loans to two RTFC borrowers totaling $9 million. In addition, we have


30


continued to receive payments on the remaining outstanding nonperforming loan losses was $18to a CFC electric power supply borrower, including payments totaling $29 million and $19during fiscal year 2022, which reduced the balance of this loan to $114 million as of May 31, 20192022, from $143 million as of May 31, 2021. These reductions were partially offset by the classification during the fiscal quarter ended May 31, 2022 (the “fourth quarter of fiscal year 2022”) of the $28 million loan outstanding to Brazos Sandy Creek Electric Cooperative Inc. (“Brazos Sandy Creek”) as nonperforming following its bankruptcy filing, as discussed below.

Loans outstanding to Brazos, which filed for bankruptcy in March 2021 due to its exposure to elevated wholesale electric power costs during the February 2021 polar vortex, accounted for $86 million and 2018,$85 million of our total nonperforming loans as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Brazos is not permitted to make scheduled loan payments without approval of the bankruptcy court. As a result, we have not received payments from Brazos since March 2021, and its loans outstanding to us were delinquent as of each respective date.

On March 18, 2022, Brazos Sandy Creek, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Brazos and a CFC Texas-based electric power supply borrower, filed for bankruptcy following the filing of a motion by Brazos to reject its power purchase agreement with Brazos Sandy Creek as part of Brazos’ bankruptcy proceedings. A Chapter 7 Trustee has been appointed, and the Chapter 7 Trustee was approved by the bankruptcy court to operate Brazos Sandy Creek as a going concern. CFC had a secured loan outstanding to Brazos Sandy Creek totaling $28 million as of May 31, 2022, which, upon notification of the bankruptcy filing by Brazos Sandy Creek, we classified as nonperforming during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2022. Brazos Sandy Creek’s loan outstanding of $28 million was delinquent as of May 31, 2022 and on nonaccrual status as of this date. Aggregate loans outstanding to Brazos and Brazos Sandy Creek totaled $114 million as of May 31, 2022, of which $49 million were secured and $65 million were unsecured. Prior to Brazos’ and Brazos Sandy Creek’s bankruptcy filings in March 2021 and March 2022, respectively, we had not experienced any defaults or charge-offs in our electric utility and telecommunications loan portfolios since fiscal years 2013 and 2017, respectively.

Our allowance for credit losses and allowance coverage ratio decreased to $68 million and 0.22%, respectively, as of May 31, 2022, from $86 million and 0.30%, respectively, as of May 31, 2021. The decrease in the allowance for credit losses of $18 million reflected a decrease in the collective and asset-specific allowance of $14 million and $4 million, respectively. The collective allowance decrease of $14 million was attributable to an improvement in Rayburn’s credit risk profile following Rayburn’s successful completion of a securitization transaction in February 2022 and subsequent payment in full of its obligations to ERCOT and a significant reduction in loans outstanding to Rayburn, as discussed above. The asset-specific allowance decrease of $4 million stemmed from the combined impact of the elimination of an asset-specific allowance attributable to nonperforming loans totaling $9 million that were paid in full during the second quarter of fiscal year 2022 and the decrease of an asset-specific allowance for a nonperforming CFC power supply borrower, attributable to loan payments received on this loan, partially offset by the addition of an asset-specific allowance for Brazos Sandy Creek due to its bankruptcy filing, as discussed above.

As a result of Rayburn’s payment in full of its February 2021 polar vortex-related outstanding obligations to ERCOT, we believe our exposure to the significant adverse financial impact on some electric utilities from the surge in wholesale power costs in Texas during the February 2021 polar vortex is now limited to loans outstanding to Brazos and its wholly-owned subsidiary Brazos Sandy Creek.

We discuss our methodology for estimating the allowance for credit losses in “Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” of this Report. We also provide additional information on the credit quality of our loan portfolio and the allowance coverage ratio was 0.07% asfor credit losses below in the sections “Critical Accounting Estimates” and “Credit Risk—Allowance for Credit Losses” and “Note 4—Loans” and “Note 5—Allowance for Credit Losses” of each date.this Report.


Financing Activity


We issue debt primarily to fund growth in our loan portfolio. As such, our outstanding debt volumeoutstanding generally increases and decreases in response to member loan demand. Total debt outstanding increased by $528$1,321 million, or 2%5%, from the prior fiscal year endto $28,747 million as of May 31, 2022, due to an increase in borrowings to fund the increase in loans to members. The increase was primarily attributable to a net increase in borrowings under the Guaranteed Underwriter Program of $554 million, a net increase in subordinated deferrable debt of $244 million, a net increase in Farmer Mac notes payable of $163 million and a net increase in member commercial paper, select notes and daily liquidity fund notes of $51 million. These increases were partially offset by net decreases in collateral trust bonds outstanding of $255 million, dealer commercial paper of $120 million and dealer medium-term notes of $61 million. Outstanding dealer commercial paper of $945$1,025 million as of May 31, 20192022 was within our quarter-end target range. Our goal is to maintain dealer commercial paper balance at each quarter-end within a range of $1,000 million and $1,500 million. We provide additional information on our financing activities during fiscal year 2022 in the below our targeted limit of $1,250 million.

Outlook for the Next 12 Months

We currently expect that our net interest income, adjusted net interest income, tier, adjusted tier, net interest yield and adjusted net interest yield will increase over the next 12 months, largely due to the cost savings from the repayment of the $1 billion aggregate principal amount of 10.375% collateral trust bonds, which matured on November 1, 2018, and the replacementin section “Consolidated Balance Sheet Analysis—Debt” of this Report.


31


On December 13, 2021, S&P affirmed CFC’s credit ratings and stable outlook under its revised criteria and updated methodology for rating financial institutions published on December 9, 2021. On December 16, 2021, Moody’s affirmed CFC’s credit ratings and stable outlook. On February 4, 2022, Fitch issued a credit ratings report review of CFC in which Fitch affirmed CFC’s credit ratings and stable outlook. Table 31 presents our credit ratings for each CFC debt with lower-cost funding.

Long-term debt scheduled to mature over the next 12 months totaled $1,638 millionproduct type as of May 31, 2019, consisting2022, which remain unchanged as of $1,416 millionthe date of fixed-rate debt at a weighted average costthis Report, in the below section “Liquidity Risk—Credit Ratings” of 2.26% and $222 millionthis Report.

Liquidity

Our primary sources of variable-rate debt. We believe we have sufficient liquidity from the combination of existing cash and cash equivalents,funds include member loan principal repayments, securities held in our investment portfolio, committed bank revolving lines of credit, committed loan facilities under the Guaranteed Underwriter Program, revolving note purchase agreements with Farmer Mac and our ability to issueproceeds from debt in the capital markets,issuances to our members and in private placementsthe public capital markets. Although as a non-bank financial institution we are not subject to regulatory liquidity requirements, we monitor our liquidity and funding positions on an ongoing basis and assess our ability to meet our scheduled debt obligations and other cash flow requirements based on point-in-time metrics as well as forward-looking projections. Our liquidity and funding assessment takes into consideration amounts available under existing liquidity sources, the demand forexpected rollover of member short-term investments and scheduled loan advancesprincipal repayment amounts, as well as our continued ability to access the private placement and satisfy our obligations to repay long-term debt maturing over the next 12 months. public capital markets.

As of May 31, 2019, sources of2022, our available liquidity readily available for access totaled $6,945$6,797 million, consisting of (i) $178 million in cash and cash equivalents;equivalents of $154 million; (ii) investments in debt securities with an aggregate fair value of $566 million, which is subject to changes based on market fluctuations; (iii) up to $1,350$2,597 million available under committed bank revolving line of credit agreements; (iv) up to $1,075 million available under committed loan facilities under the Guaranteed Underwriter Program; (iii)and (v) up to $2,972 million available for access under committed bank revolving line of credit agreements; (iv) up to $2,145$2,405 million available under a revolving note purchase agreement with Farmer Mac, subject to market conditions;conditions. In addition to our existing available liquidity of $6,797 million as of May 31, 2022, we expect to receive $1,479 million from scheduled long-term loan principal payments over the next 12 months.

Debt scheduled to mature over the next 12 months totaled $6,894 million as of May 31, 2022, consisting of short-term borrowings of $4,981 million and (v) up to $300long-term and subordinated debt of $1,913 million. The short-term borrowings scheduled maturity amount of $4,981 million consists of member investments of $3,956 million and dealer commercial paper of $1,025 million. The long-term and subordinated scheduled debt obligations over the next 12 months of $1,913 million consist of debt maturities and scheduled debt payment amounts.

Our available under a committed revolving note purchase agreement with Farmer Mac.

liquidity of $6,797 million as of May 31, 2022, was $97 million below our total scheduled debt obligations over the next 12 months of $6,894 million. We believe we can continue to roll over outstandingour member short-term debtinvestments of $2,663$3,956 million as of May 31, 2019,2022, based on our expectation that our members will continue to reinvest their excess cash in ourshort-term investment products offered by CFC. Our members historically have maintained a relatively stable level of short-term investments in CFC in the form of commercial paper, select notes, daily liquidity fund notes select notes and medium-term notes. Member short-term investments in CFC have averaged $3,584 million over the last 12 fiscal quarter-end reporting periods. In addition, we expect to receive $1,479 million from scheduled long-term loan principal payments over the next 12 months. Our available liquidity of $6,797 million as of May 31, 2022 was $3,859 million in excess of, or 2.3 times, our total scheduled debt obligations, excluding member short-term investments, over the next 12 months of $2,938 million.

We expect to continue accessing the dealer commercial paper market to help meetas a cost-effective means of satisfying our incremental short-term liquidity needs. Although the intra-period amount of outstanding dealer commercial paper outstanding may fluctuate based on our liquidity requirements, we intendour intent is to manage our short-term wholesale funding risk by maintaining outstanding dealer commercial paper outstanding at an amount near or below $1,250each quarter-end within a range of $1,000 million for the foreseeable future. We expect to continue to be in compliance with the covenants underand $1,500 million. Maintaining our committed bank revolving line of credit agreements which will allow usand continuing to be in compliance with the covenants of these agreements serve to mitigate roll-overour rollover risk, as we can draw on these facilities, if necessary, to repay dealer or member commercial paper that cannot be refinanced with similar debt.

While In addition, under master repurchase agreements we are nothave with counterparties, we can obtain short-term funding in secured borrowing transactions by selling investment-grade corporate debt securities from our investment securities portfolio subject to bank regulatoryan obligation to repurchase the same or similar securities at an agreed-upon price and date.



32


The issuance of long-term debt, which represents the most significant component of our funding, allows us to reduce our reliance on short-term borrowings, as well as effectively manage our refinancing and interest rate risk. We expect to continue to issue debt in the private placement and public capital rules,markets to meet our funding needs and believe that we generally aimhave sufficient sources of liquidity to meet our debt obligations and support our operations over the next 12 months.

We provide additional information on our liquidity profile and our primary sources and uses of funds, including projected amounts, by quarter, over each of the next six fiscal quarters through the quarter ending November 30, 2023, in the below section “Liquidity Risk” of this Report.

COVID-19

We believe that the COVID-19 pandemic has not adversely affected our primary objective of providing our members with the credit products they need to fund their operations and that we have been able to successfully navigate the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic to date. Our electric utility cooperative borrowers operate in a sector identified by the U.S. government as one of the 16 critical infrastructure sectors because the nature of the services provided in these sectors is considered essential and vital in supporting and maintaining the overall functioning of the U.S. economy. Historically, the utility sector in which our electric utility borrowers operate has been resilient to economic downturns. To date, we believe that the pandemic has not had a significant negative impact on the overall financial performance of our members. We also believe that the overall credit quality of our loan portfolio has not been adversely affected by market, economic and other disruptions caused by the pandemic, as we have not experienced any delinquencies in scheduled loan payments or received requests for payment deferrals from our borrowers due to the pandemic.

CFC has been able to maintain business continuity throughout the pandemic and has experienced no pandemic-related employee furloughs or layoffs. We have remote-work options available for most employees while also providing for in- person collaboration at our headquarters in Loudoun County, Virginia, as we believe this working model allows CFC to provide the highest quality of service and deliver more effectively on our member-focused mission. Effective March 2, 2022, we lifted our mask requirement at CFC’s headquarters for vaccinated employees based on the CDC’s updated guidance and the COVID-19 Community Level low classification for Loudoun County at that time. We plan to continue to monitor and update our practices in response to changes in the COVID-19 workplace safety and health standards established by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”) and Virginia as they relate to Loudoun County and guidance provided by the CDC.

Although most health and safety restrictions in response to COVID-19 have been lifted, we cannot predict the potential future impact that the COVID-19 pandemic may have on our operations and financial performance, or the specific ways the pandemic may uniquely impact our members. We provide additional information on actions taken in response to the pandemic to protect the safety and health of our employees under “Item 1. Business—Human Capital Management” in this Report. We discuss the potential adverse impact of natural disasters, including weather-related events such as the February 2021 polar vortex, and widespread health emergencies, such as COVID-19, on our business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity under “Item 1A. Risk Factors—Operations and Business Risks” in this Report.

Electric Cooperative Industry Trends and Developments

We believe there are emerging developments and trends in the electric cooperative sector that may present opportunities as well as challenges for our electric cooperative members. These trends include (i) expanded investments by some electric cooperatives to deploy broadband services to their members; (ii) inflation and supply chain disruptions; (iii) an increased focus on enhancing electric system resiliency and reliability; (iv) evolving relationships between some electric cooperative power supply systems and electric cooperative distribution systems to increase investments in renewable power supply; and (v) growing support of beneficial electrification strategies to reduce overall carbon emissions, while also providing benefits to cooperative members.

Expanded Investments to Deploy Broadband Services

Many rural electric distribution cooperatives have made or are making infrastructure investments that include building fiber optic lines to improve electric grid system reliability, efficiency and cost savings, as fiber operations offers enhanced communication to monitor electric systems, identify outages and speed electric restoration. Some of these electric


33


cooperatives are leveraging these fiber assets to offer access to broadband services, either directly or by partnering with local telecommunication companies and others, to the communities they serve. We are currently aware of 185 broadband projects by different CFC member cooperatives, and we financed or are financing 112 of these 185 broadband projects. Capital expenditures for the completion of these 185 broadband projects are expected to total approximately $9,632 million. We believe that the capital expenditures for the completion of the broadband projects that we financed or are financing will total approximately $3,985 million. Our aggregate loans outstanding to CFC electric distribution cooperative members relating to broadband projects, which we started tracking in October 2017, increased to an estimated $1,647 million as of May 31, 2022, from approximately $854 million as of May 31, 2021. The three states with the largest CFC loans outstanding for broadband projects were Oklahoma, Indiana and Arkansas as of May 31, 2022, and broadband loans outstanding for these states totaled $205 million, $191 million and $155 million, respectively, as of this date. Many of these broadband projects are also financially supported by various states and the federal government, which reduces the credit risk for CFC and the investment risk for our electric cooperative members. We expect our member electric cooperatives to continue in their efforts to expand broadband access to unserved and underserved communities.

Inflation and Supply Chain Disruptions

Many rural electric cooperatives are experiencing increasing cost in power supply, labor and materials. Power supply cost for many cooperatives is increasingly volatile based on natural gas and coal market pricing. For example, according to the Economic News Release from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics published on July 13, 2022, the index for natural gas increased 38.4% over the last 12 months, the largest increase since the period ending October 2005. In addition to increasing material cost, supply chain disruptions have extended delivery times for utility hardware and are causing project timelines to be extended as well. Labor cost and competition for employees has increased for some cooperatives due to labor shortages.

Increased Focus on Enhancing Electric System Resiliency and Reliability

We have observed an increase in capital investments by electric cooperatives to proactively strengthen existing electric systems as well as replace systems in the aftermath of damages from recent weather-related incidents, including hurricanes and winter storms. We believe that the adverse impact on electric systems from weather-related incidents and wildfires has resulted in a heightened awareness by electric cooperatives of the need to focus attention on making infrastructure upgrades to improve both the resiliency and reliability of electric systems.

Evolving Cooperative Focus on Clean Energy Supply Investments

We also have observed that many electric power supply and electric distribution cooperatives are increasingly focused on efforts to identify potential opportunities to increase investments in renewable power supply and storage. This includes both on-balance sheet construction of renewable generation and off-balance sheet acquisition of renewable power through power purchase agreements. According to the NRECA, electric cooperatives more than tripled their renewable capacity from 3.9 gigawatts to more than 13 gigawatts from 2010 to 2021, including adding 1.4 gigawatts of renewable capacity in 2021 alone.

Growing Support for Beneficial Electrification

Rural electric cooperatives have become increasingly supportive of beneficial electrification, which refers to the replacement of fossil-fuel powered systems with electrical ones in a way that reduces overall emissions, while providing benefits to the environment and to households. The increased support among electric cooperatives reflects an expectation that beneficial electrification will result in increased sales, while also saving money for members and reducing carbon emission.

We believe the above trends and current investment priorities of our electric cooperative members will require reliable, affordable sources of funding and may result in a steady demand for capital from CFC.

Outlook

As further described below in the “Liquidity Risk—Projected Near-Term Sources and Uses of Funds” section, we currently anticipate net long-term loan growth of $1,150 million over the next 12 months. On March 16, 2022, the Federal Open


34


Market Committee (“FOMC”) of the Federal Reserve raised the target range for the federal funds rate by 0.25% to a range of 0.25% to 0.50%, the first rate increase since December 2018. The FOMC further raised the target range for the federal funds rate at each of its meetings held in May, June and July 2022, with the federal funds rate reaching a target range of 2.25% to 2.50%. The FOMC also signaled an expectation of ongoing increases in the federal funds rate at each of its remaining three meetings in 2022, and pointed to a consensus target rate of 3.40% by December 31, 2022, an increase from its March 2022 estimated target rate of 1.90%, due to an increase in inflation projections. The yield curve has flattened throughout 2022, was briefly inverted in late March 2022 and again in June and July 2022. The consensus market outlook for interest rates as of the second half of June 2022 pointed to rising interest rates across the yield curve, with the yield curve remaining flat or inverted over the remainder of 2022. Based on this yield curve forecast, we anticipate a decrease in our reported net interest income, reported net interest yield and adjusted net interest yield over the next 12 months relative to the prior 12-month period ended May 31, 2022. However, we expect a slight increase in our adjusted net interest income over the next 12 months relative to the prior 12-month period ended May 31, 2022, due to an anticipated reduction in our derivative net periodic cash settlements expense as short-term interest rates rise.

We anticipate a slight decrease in our adjusted net income and adjusted TIER over the next 12 months. While our goal is to maintain an adjusted debt-to-equity ratio atof approximately or below 6.00-to-1. As discussed above, 6.00-to-1, we issued $250 million of subordinated deferrable debt in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2019. Subordinated debt is treated in the same manner as equity in calculating our adjusted debt-to-equity ratio, pursuant to the financial covenants under our revolving bank line of credit agreements, as further discussed below under “Non-GAAP Financial Measures.” The subordinated deferrable debt issuance contributed to a reduction in our adjusted debt-to-equity ratio to 5.73 as of May 31, 2019, from 6.18 as of May 31, 2018. Based on our projection of loan advances and adjusted equity over the next 12 months, we anticipateexpect that our adjusted debt-to-equity ratio will remain belownear the current level due to the anticipated loan growth. As discussed above, we are subject to earnings volatility, often significant, because we do not apply hedge accounting to our target thresholdinterest rate swaps. Therefore, the periodic unrealized fluctuations in the fair value of 6.00-to-1.our interest rate swaps are recorded in our earnings. The variances in our earnings between periods are generally attributable to significant shifts in recorded unrealized derivative forward value gain and loss amounts. We exclude the impact of unrealized derivative forward fair value gains and losses from our non-GAAP adjusted measures.

We are unable to provide a reconciliation of our projected adjusted net income, adjusted TIER and adjusted debt-to-equity ratio to the most directly comparable GAAP measures or directional guidance for the most directly comparable GAAP measures on a forward-looking basis without unreasonable effort due to the significant shifts in the unrealized derivative forward value gains and losses recorded each period. The majority of our swaps are long-term, with an average remaining life of approximately 15 years as of May 31, 2022. We can reasonably estimate the realized net periodic derivative cash settlement amounts over the next 12 months for our interest rate swaps, which are typically based on the 3-month LIBOR and the fixed rate of the swap. In contrast, the unrealized periodic derivative forward value gains and losses are largely based on future expected changes in longer-term interest rates, which we are unable to accurately predict for each reporting period over the next 12 months. Because unrealized periodic derivative forward value gain and loss amounts are a key driver of changes in our earnings between periods, this unavailable information is likely to have a significant impact on our reported net income, TIER and debt-to-equity ratio, which represent the most directly comparable GAAP measures. We provide reconciliations of our non-GAAP adjusted net income, adjusted TIER and adjusted debt-to-equity ratio to the most directly comparable GAAP measures for each reporting period included in this Report in the section “Non-GAAP Financial Measures.” These reconciliations illustrate the potential significant impact that unrealized derivative forward value gains and losses could have on our future reported net income, reported TIER and reported adjusted debt-to-equity ratio.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES


The preparation of financial statements in accordanceconformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make a number of judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets, liabilities, income and expenses in theour consolidated financial statements. Understanding our accounting policies and the extent to which we use management’s judgment and estimates in applying these policies is integral to understanding our financial statements. We provide a discussion of our significant accounting policies underin “Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.”


We have identified certainCertain accounting policies asestimates are considered critical because they involve significant judgments and assumptions about highly complex and inherently uncertain matters, and the use of reasonably different estimates and assumptions could have a material impact on our results of operations or financial condition. Our most critical accounting policies and estimates involve theThe determination of the allowance for expected credit losses over the remaining expected life of the loans in our loan portfolio involves a significant degree of management judgment and level of estimation uncertainty. As such, we have identified our accounting policy governing the estimation of the allowance for credit losses as a critical accounting estimate. Management established policies and fair value. control procedures intended to ensure that the methodology used for determining our allowance for credit losses, including any judgments and assumptions made as part of such method, are well-controlled and applied consistently from period to period. We evaluate


35


our critical accounting estimates and judgments required by our policies on an ongoing basis and update them as necessary based on changing conditions. Management has discussed significant judgmentsWe describe our allowance methodology and assumptions in applying our critical accounting policies withprocess for estimating the Audit Committeeallowance for credit losses under “Note 1—Summary of our board of directors. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors” for a discussion of the risks associated with management’s judgments and estimates in applying our accounting policies and methods.


Significant Accounting Policies—Allowance for Credit Losses—Loan LossesPortfolio—Current Methodology.”


WeUpon our adoption of CECL on June 1, 2020, we are required to maintain an allowance for loanbased on a current estimate of credit losses that represents management’s estimateare expected to occur over the remaining life of probable losses inherent in our loan portfolio as of each balance sheet date. Our allowance for loan losses consists of a collective allowance forthe loans in our portfolio that are not individually impaired and a specific allowance for loans identified as individually impaired. Our allowance for loan losses was $18 million and $19 million as of May 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, and the allowance coverage ratio was 0.07% as of each date.portfolio. The methodology usedmethods utilized to estimate the allowance for loancredit losses, key assumptions and quantitative and qualitative information considered by management in determining the appropriate allowance for credit losses is describeddiscussed in “Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.”


Key inputs, such as our historical loss data and third-party default data, that we use in determining the appropriate allowance for credit losses are more readily quantifiable, while other inputs, such as our internally assigned borrower risk ratings that are intended to assess a borrower’s capacity to meet its financial obligations and provide information on the probability of default, require more qualitative judgment. Degrees of imprecision exist in each of these inputs due in part to subjective judgments involved and an inherent lag in the data available to quantify current conditions and events that may affect our credit loss estimate.

Our internally assigned borrower risk ratings serve as the primary credit quality indicator for our loan portfolio. We perform an annual comprehensive review of each of our borrowers, following the receipt of the borrower’s annual audited financial statements, to reassess the borrower’s risk rating. In addition, interim risk-rating adjustments may occur as a result of updated information affecting a borrower’s ability to fulfill its obligations or other significant developments and trends. Our Credit Risk Management Group and Corporate Credit Committee review and provide rigorous oversight and governance around our internally assigned risk ratings to ensure the ratings process is consistent. In addition, we engage third-party credit risk management experts to conduct an independent annual review of our risk rating system to validate its overall integrity. This review involves an evaluation of the accuracy and timeliness of individual risk ratings and the overall effectiveness of our risk-rating framework relative to the risk profile of our credit exposures. While we have a robust risk-rating process, changes in our borrower risk ratings may not always directly coincide with changes in the risk profile of an individual borrower due to the timing of the rating process and a potential lag in the receipt of information necessary to evaluate the impact of emerging developments and current conditions on the risk ratings of our borrower. Although our allowance for credit losses is sensitive to each key input, shifts in the credit risk ratings of our borrowers generally have the most notable impact on our allowance for credit losses.

Allowance for Credit Losses

Our allowance for credit losses and allowance coverage ratio decreased to $68 million and 0.22%, respectively, as of May 31, 2022, from $86 million and 0.30%, respectively, as of May 31, 2021. The decrease in the allowance for credit losses of $18 million reflected a decrease in the collective and asset-specific allowance of $14 million and $4 million, respectively. We discuss the methodology used to estimate the allowance for credit losses in “Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.”

Key Assumptions


Determining the appropriateness of the allowance for loancredit losses is subject to numerous estimates and assumptions requiring significant management judgment about matters that involve a high degree of subjectivity and are difficult to predict. The key assumptions in determining our collective allowance that require significant management judgment and may have a material impact on the amount of the allowance include:include the segmentation of our evaluation of the risk profile of various loan portfolio segments andportfolio; our internally assigned borrower risk ratings; the estimated loss emergence period; the probability of default; the loss severity or recovery rate in the event of default for each portfolio segment; and management’s judgment in the selection and evaluationconsideration of qualitativefactors that may cause estimated credit losses associated with our existing loan portfolio to assess the overall current level of exposure withindiffer from our loan portfolio.historical loss experience.


As discussed below in “Credit Risk—Loan Portfolio Credit Risk,” CFC has experienced only 1618 defaults in its 50-year history. In addition,53-year history, and prior to Brazos and Brazos Sandy Creek we have had no defaults in our electric utility loan portfolio during the past fivesince fiscal years.
year 2013. As such, we have a limited history of defaults to develop reasonable and supportable estimated probability of default rates for our existing loan portfolio. We therefore utilize third-party default data for the utility sector as a proxy to estimate


36


probability of default rates for our loan portfolio segments. However, we utilize our internal historical loss experience to estimate loss given default, or the recovery rate, for each of our loan portfolio segments,segments. We believe our internal historical loss experience serves as we believe it provides a more reliable estimate of loss severity than third-party loss severity data due to the organizational structure and operating environment of rural utility cooperatives, our lending practice of generally requiring a senior security position on the assets and revenuesrevenue of borrowers for long-term loans, the approach we take in working with borrowers that may be experiencing operational or financial issues and other factors discussed underin “Credit Risk—Loan Portfolio Credit Risk.”


We generally consider nonperforming loans as well as loans that have been or are anticipated to be modified under a troubled debt restructuring for individual evaluation given the risk characteristics of such loans and establish an asset-specific allowance for these loans. The key assumptions in determining our specificasset-specific allowance that require significant management judgment and may have a material impact on the amount of the allowance include estimatingmeasuring the amount and timing of expectedfuture cash flows from impairedfor individually evaluated loans that are not collateral-dependent and estimating the value of the underlying collateral each of which impacts loss severity and certain cash flow assumptions. for individually evaluated loans that are collateral-dependent.

The degree to which any particular assumption affects the allowance for loancredit losses depends on the severity of the change and its relationship to the other assumptions. We regularly evaluate the underlyingkey inputs and assumptions used in determining the allowance for loancredit losses and periodically update our assumptionsthem, as necessary, to better reflect present conditions, including current trends in credit performance and borrower risk profile, portfolio concentration risk, changes in risk-management practices, changes in the regulatory environment general economic trends and other factors specificrelevant to our loan portfolio segments. We did not change theour allowance methodology or nature of the underlying assumptions andkey inputs used and assumptions used in determiningmeasuring our allowance for loancredit losses during fiscal year 2019.2022.


Sensitivity Analysis


As noted above, our allowance for credit losses is sensitive to a variety of factors. While management uses its best judgment to assess loss data and other factors to determine the allowance for loancredit losses, changes in our loss assumptions, adjustments to assigned borrower risk ratings, the use of alternate external data sources or other factors could affect our estimate of probable credit losses inherent in the portfolio as of each balance sheet date, which would also impact the related provision for loancredit losses recognized in our consolidated statements of operations. For example, changes in the inputs below, without taking into consideration the impact of other potential offsetting or correlated inputs, would have the following effect on our allowance of loancredit losses as of May 31, 2019.2022.


A 10% increase or decreasedecrease in the default rates for all of our portfolio segments would result in a corresponding increase or decrease of approximately $2$3 million.
A 1% increase or decrease in the recovery rates for all of our portfolio segments would result in a corresponding decrease or increase of approximately $4$9 million.


A one-notch downgrade in the internal borrower risk ratings for our entire loan portfolio would result in an increase of approximately $17$13 million, while a one-notch upgrade would result in a decrease of approximately $11$14 million.


These sensitivity analyses are intended to provide an indication of the isolated impact of hypothetical alternative assumptions on our allowance for loancredit losses. Because management evaluates a variety of factors and inputs in determining the allowance for loancredit losses, these sensitivity analyses are not considered probable and do not imply an expectation of future changes in loss rates or borrower risk ratings. Given current processes employed in estimating the allowance for loancredit losses, management believes the inherent loss rates and currently assigned risk ratings are appropriate. It is possible that others performing the analyses, given the same information, may at any point in time reach different reasonable conclusions that could be significant to our consolidated financial statements.


We discuss the risks and uncertainties related to management’s judgments and estimates in applying accounting policies that have been identified as a critical accounting estimates under “Item 1A. Risk Factors—Regulatory and Compliance Risks” in this Report. We provide additional information on ourthe allowance for loancredit losses under the below section “Credit Risk—Allowance for LoanCredit Losses” and “Note 5—Allowance for Loan Losses.” Also refer to “Credit Risk—Loan and Guarantee Portfolio Credit Risk—Credit Quality” andLosses” in this Report.
“Note 4—Loans” for information on the credit performance and quality of our loan portfolios.

Fair Value

Certain of our financial instruments are carried at fair value on our consolidated balance sheet, with changes in fair value recorded either through earnings or other comprehensive income (loss) in accordance with applicable accounting standards. These include our equity securities and derivatives. The determination of fair value is important for certain other assets that are periodically evaluated for impairment using fair value, such as individually impaired loans.

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date (also referred to as an exit price). The fair value accounting guidance provides a three-level fair value hierarchy for classifying fair value measurement techniques. This hierarchy is based on the markets in which the assets or liabilities trade and whether the inputs to the valuation techniques used to measure fair value are observable or unobservable. Fair value measurement is assigned a level based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are summarized below:

Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
Level 2: Observable market-based inputs, other than quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
Level 3: Unobservable inputs

The degree of management judgment involved in determining fair value is dependent upon the availability of quoted prices in active markets or observable market parameters. When quoted prices and observable data in active markets are not fully available, management’s judgment is necessary to estimate fair value. Changes in market conditions, such as reduced liquidity in the capital markets or changes in secondary market activities, may reduce the availability and reliability of quoted prices or observable data used to determine fair value.

Significant judgment may be required to determine whether certain assets and liabilities measured at fair value are classified as Level 2 or Level 3. In making this determination, we consider all available information that market participants use to measure fair value, including observable market data, indications of market liquidity and orderliness, and our understanding of the valuation techniques and significant inputs used. Based upon the specific facts and circumstances, judgments are made regarding the significance of Level 3 inputs used in determining the fair value of the asset or liability in its entirety. If Level 3 inputs are considered significant, the valuation technique is classified as Level 3. The process for determining fair value using unobservable inputs is generally more subjective and involves a high degree of management judgment and assumptions.

Financial instruments recorded at fair value on a recurring basis, which consisted primarily of equity securities, deferred compensation investments and derivatives, represented approximately 1% of our total assets as of May 31, 2019 and 2018, and 2% and 1%, respectively, of total liabilities as of May 31, 2019 and 2018. The fair value of these financial instruments was determined using either Level 1 or 2 inputs. We did not have any financial instruments recorded at fair value on a recurring basis for which the fair value was determined using Level 3 inputs as of May 31, 2019 and 2018.
We discuss the valuation inputs and assumptions used in determining the fair value, including the extent to which we have relied on significant unobservable inputs to estimate fair value, in “Note 14—Fair Value Measurement.”





37


RECENT ACCOUNTING CHANGES AND OTHER DEVELOPMENTS


Recent Accounting Changes


See “Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” forWe provide information on recently adopted accounting standards adopted duringand the current year, as well asadoption impact on CFC’s consolidated financial statements and recently issued accounting standards not yet required to be adopted and the expected adoption impact in “Note 1—Summary of the adoption of these accounting standards.Significant Accounting Policies.” To the extent we believe the adoption of new accounting standards has had or will have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations, financial condition or liquidity, we also discuss the impact in the applicable section(s) of this MD&A.


Other Developments

SEC Rule—FAST Act Modernization and Simplification of Regulation S-K

In March 2019, the SEC adopted amendments to modernize and simplify certain disclosure requirements in Regulation S-K
FAST Act Modernization and Simplification of Regulation S-K and related rules and forms. The amendments, which, among other things, change the requirements for the content of MD&A and change the process for redacting confidential information in certain exhibits, are intended to improve the readability and navigability of disclosure documents and discourage repetition and disclosure of immaterial information. The final rule became effective May 2, 2019.

The provisions of the rule that have the most significant impact on our disclosures under Regulation S-K and the content of this Report include: (i) the elimination of the requirement to disclose business segment information in “Item 1. Business” because this information is also required to be disclosed in the financial statements; (ii) the elimination of the requirement to include in MD&A a discussion of the earliest year for registrants that provide financial statements covering three years in their filings, as such discussion is already included in prior filings; and (iii) a requirement that registrants identify the location in the prior filing where the omitted discussion can be found.
CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


TheThis section below provides a comparative discussion of our consolidated results of operations between fiscal year 2019years 2022 and 2018.2021. Following this section, we provide a comparativediscussion and analysis of material changes in amounts reported on our consolidated balance sheetssheet as of May 31, 20192022 and 2018.amounts reported as of May 31, 2021. You should read these sections together with our “Executive Summary—Outlook for the Next 12 Months”Outlook” where we discuss trends and other factors that we expect will affect our future results of operations. See “Item 7. MD&A—Consolidated Results of Operations ”Operations” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 20182021 (“2021 Form 10-K”) for a comparative discussion of our consolidated results of operations between fiscal year 20182021 and 2017.the fiscal year ended May 31, 2020 (“fiscal year 2020”).


Net Interest Income


Net interest income, which is our largest source of revenue, represents the difference between the interest income earned on our interest-earning assets which includes loans and investment securities, and the interest expense on our interest-bearing liabilities. Our net interest yield represents the difference between the yield on our interest-earning assets and the cost of our interest-bearing liabilities plus the impact fromof non-interest bearing funding. We expect net interest income and our net interest yield to fluctuate based on changes in interest rates and changes in the amount and composition of our interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. We do not fund each individual loan with specific debt. Rather, we attempt to minimize costs and maximize efficiency by proportionately funding large aggregated amounts of loans.


Table 12 presents average balances for fiscal years 2019, 20182022, 2021 and 2017,2020, and for each major category of our interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, the interest income earned or interest expense incurred, and the average yield or cost. Table 12 also presents non-GAAP adjusted interest expense, adjusted net interest income and adjusted net interest yield, which reflect the inclusion of net accrued periodic derivative cash settlements expense in interest expense. We provide reconciliations of our non-GAAP adjusted measures to the most comparable U.S. GAAP measures under “Non-GAAP Financial Measures.”





38


Table 1:2: Average Balances, Interest Income/Interest Expense and Average Yield/Cost
Year Ended May 31,
(Dollars in thousands)202220212020
Assets:Average BalanceInterest Income/ExpenseAverage Yield/CostAverage BalanceInterest Income/ExpenseAverage Yield/CostAverage BalanceInterest Income/ExpenseAverage Yield/Cost
Long-term fixed-rate loans(1)
$25,974,724 $1,062,223 4.09 %$24,978,267 $1,051,524 4.21 %$23,890,577 $1,043,918 4.37 %
Long-term variable-rate loans749,131 16,895 2.26 645,819 14,976 2.32 891,541 31,293 3.51 
Line of credit loans2,148,197 46,887 2.18 1,626,092 35,596 2.19 1,718,364 55,140 3.21 
Troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”) loans9,528 735 7.71 10,328 790 7.65 11,238 836 7.44 
Nonperforming loans227,795   185,554 — — 5,957 — — 
Other, net(2)
 (1,448) — (1,381)— — (1,304)— 
Total loans29,109,375 1,125,292 3.87 27,446,060 1,101,505 4.01 26,517,677 1,129,883 4.26 
Cash, time deposits and investment securities762,489 15,951 2.09 796,566 15,096 1.90 866,013 21,403 2.47 
Total interest-earning assets$29,871,864 $1,141,243 3.82 %$28,242,626 $1,116,601 3.95 %$27,383,690 $1,151,286 4.20 %
Other assets, less allowance for credit losses(3)
466,329 537,506 551,378 
Total assets(3)
$30,338,193 $28,780,132 $27,935,068 
Liabilities:
Commercial paper$2,565,629 $11,086 0.43 %$2,189,558 $8,330 0.38 %$2,318,112 $45,713 1.97 %
Other short-term borrowings2,006,020 7,179 0.36 2,148,767 6,400 0.30 1,795,351 32,282 1.80 
Short-term borrowings(4)
4,571,649 18,265 0.40 4,338,325 14,730 0.34 4,113,463 77,995 1.90 
Medium-term notes4,854,421 108,769 2.24 3,904,603 113,582 2.91 3,551,973 125,954 3.55 
Collateral trust bonds7,050,468 248,413 3.52 6,938,534 249,248 3.59 7,185,910 257,396 3.58 
Guaranteed Underwriter Program notes payable6,165,206 169,166 2.74 6,146,410 167,403 2.72 5,581,854 162,929 2.92 
Farmer Mac notes payable3,059,946 55,245 1.81 2,844,252 50,818 1.79 2,986,469 87,617 2.93 
Other notes payable6,774 155 2.29 10,246 241 2.35 17,586 671 3.82 
Subordinated deferrable debt986,407 51,541 5.23 986,209 51,551 5.23 986,035 51,527 5.23 
Subordinated certificates1,245,120 53,980 4.34 1,270,385 54,490 4.29 1,349,454 57,000 4.22 
Total interest-bearing liabilities$27,939,991 $705,534 2.53 %$26,438,964 $702,063 2.66 %$25,772,744 $821,089 3.19 %
Other liabilities(3)
897,751 1,380,414 1,141,884 
Total liabilities(3)
28,837,742 27,819,378 26,914,628 
Total equity(3)
1,500,451 960,754 1,020,440 
Total liabilities and equity(3)
$30,338,193 $28,780,132 $27,935,068 
Net interest spread(5)
1.29 %1.29 %1.01 %
Impact of non-interest bearing funding(6)
0.17 0.18 0.20 
Net interest income/net interest yield(7)
$435,709 1.46 %$414,538 1.47 %$330,197 1.21 %
Adjusted net interest income/adjusted net interest yield:
Interest income$1,141,243 3.82 %$1,116,601 3.95 %$1,151,286 4.20 %
Interest expense705,534 2.53 702,063 2.66 821,089 3.19 
Add: Net periodic derivative cash settlements interest expense(8)
101,385 1.21 115,645 1.28 55,873 0.55 
Adjusted interest expense/adjusted average cost(9)
$806,919 2.89 %$817,708 3.09 %$876,962 3.40 %
Adjusted net interest spread(7)
0.93 %0.86 %0.80 %
Impact of non-interest bearing funding(6)
0.19 0.20 0.20 
Adjusted net interest income/adjusted net interest yield(10)
$334,324 1.12 %$298,893 1.06 %$274,324 1.00 %



39


  Year Ended May 31,
(Dollars in thousands) 2019 2018 2017
Assets: Average Balance Interest Income/Expense Average Yield/Cost Average Balance Interest Income/Expense Average Yield/Cost Average Balance Interest Income/Expense Average Yield/Cost
Long-term fixed-rate loans(1)
 $22,811,905
 $1,012,277
 4.44% $22,570,209
 $1,000,492
 4.43% $21,896,200
 $980,173
 4.48%
Long-term variable-rate loans 1,093,455
 41,219
 3.77
 925,910
 27,152
 2.93
 799,412
 19,902
 2.49
Line of credit loans 1,609,629
 57,847
 3.59
 1,402,555
 38,195
 2.72
 1,124,471
 25,389
 2.26
TDR loans (2)
 12,183
 846
 6.94
 12,885
 889
 6.90
 14,349
 905
 6.31
Other income, net(3)
 
 (1,128) 
 
 (1,185) 
 
 (1,082) 
Total loans 25,527,172
 1,111,061
 4.35
 24,911,559
 1,065,543
 4.28
 23,834,432
 1,025,287
 4.30
Cash, time deposits and investment securities 838,599
 24,609
 2.93
 512,517
 11,814
 2.31
 734,095
 11,347
 1.55
Total interest-earning assets $26,365,771
 $1,135,670
 4.31% $25,424,076
 $1,077,357
 4.24% $24,568,527
 $1,036,634
 4.22%
Other assets, less allowance for loan losses 879,817
     644,563
     574,682
    
Total assets $27,245,588
     $26,068,639
     $25,143,209
    
                   
Liabilities:                  
Short-term borrowings $3,729,239
 $92,854
 2.49% $3,294,573
 $50,616
 1.54% $3,185,084
 $26,684
 0.84%
Medium-term notes 3,813,666
 133,797
 3.51
 3,361,484
 111,814
 3.33
 3,345,410
 99,022
 2.96
Collateral trust bonds 7,334,957
 273,413
 3.73
 7,625,182
 336,079
 4.41
 7,293,251
 340,854
 4.67
Guaranteed Underwriter Program notes payable 5,045,478
 147,895
 2.93
 4,956,417
 140,551
 2.84
 4,873,520
 142,661
 2.93
Farmer Mac notes payable 2,807,705
 90,942
 3.24
 2,578,793
 56,004
 2.17
 2,355,324
 33,488
 1.42
Other notes payable 28,044
 1,237
 4.41
 33,742
 1,509
 4.47
 39,314
 1,780
 4.53
Subordinated deferrable debt 759,838
 38,628
 5.08
 742,336
 37,661
 5.07
 742,203
 37,657
 5.07
Subordinated certificates 1,369,051
 57,443
 4.20
 1,396,449
 58,501
 4.19
 1,433,657
 59,592
 4.16
Total interest-bearing liabilities $24,887,978
 $836,209
 3.36% $23,988,976
 $792,735
 3.30% $23,267,763
 $741,738
 3.19%
Other liabilities 816,074
     822,745
     921,749
    
Total liabilities 25,704,052
     24,811,721
     24,189,512
    
Total equity 1,541,536
     1,256,918
     953,697
    
Total liabilities and equity $27,245,588
     $26,068,639
     $25,143,209
    
                   
Net interest spread(4)
     0.95%     0.94%     1.03%
Impact of non-interest bearing funding(5)
     0.19
     0.18
     0.17
Net interest income/net interest yield(6)
   $299,461
 1.14%   $284,622
 1.12%   $294,896
 1.20%
                   
Adjusted net interest income/adjusted net interest yield:                  
Interest income   $1,135,670
 4.31%   $1,077,357
 4.24%   $1,036,634
 4.22%
Interest expense   836,209
 3.36
   792,735
 3.30
   741,738
 3.19
Add: Net accrued periodic derivative cash settlement(7)
   43,611
 0.40
   74,281
 0.69
   84,478
 0.80
Adjusted interest expense/adjusted average cost(8)
   $879,820
 3.54%   $867,016
 3.61%   $826,216
 3.55%
Adjusted net interest spread(4)
     0.77%     0.63%     0.67%
Impact of non-interest bearing funding     0.20
     0.20
     0.19
Adjusted net interest income/adjusted net interest yield(9)
   $255,850
 0.97%   $210,341
 0.83%   $210,418
 0.86%
____________________________


____________________________
(1)Interest income on long-term, fixed-rate loans includes loan conversion fees, which are generally deferred and recognized as interest income using the effective interest method.
(2)Troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”) loans.
(3)Consists of late payment fees and net amortization of deferred loan fees and loan origination costs.
(3)The average balance represents average monthly balances, which is calculated based on the month-end balance as of the beginning of the reporting period and the balances as of the end of each month included in the specified reporting period.
(4)Short-term borrowings reported on our consolidated balance sheets consist of borrowings with an original contractual maturity of one year or less. However, short-term borrowings presented in Table 2 consist of commercial paper, select notes, daily liquidity fund notes and secured borrowings under repurchase agreements. Short-term borrowings presented on our consolidated balance sheets related to medium-term notes, Farmer Mac notes payable and other notes payable are reported in the respective category for presentation purposes in Table 2. The period-end amounts reported as short-term borrowings on our consolidated balances sheets, which are excluded from the calculation of average short-term borrowings presented in Table 2, totaled $417 million, $363 million, and $537 million as of May 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
(5)Net interest spread represents the difference between the average yield on total average interest-earning assets and the average cost of total average interest-bearing liabilities. Adjusted net interest spread represents the difference between the average yield on total average interest-earning assets and the adjusted average cost of total average interest-bearing liabilities.
(5)(6)Includes other liabilities and equity.
(6)(7)Net interest yield is calculated based on net interest income for the period divided by total average interest-earning assets for the period.
(7)(8)Represents the impact of net accrued periodic contractual interest amounts on our interest rate swap settlementsswaps during the period. This amount is added to interest expense to derive non-GAAP adjusted interest expense. The average (benefit)/cost associated with derivatives is calculated based on net accrued periodic swap settlement interest rate swap settlementsamount during the period divided by the average outstanding notional amount of derivatives during the period. The average outstanding notional amount of interest rate swaps was $10,968$8,406 million, $10,816$9,062 million and $10,590$10,180 million for fiscal year 2019, 2018years 2022, 2021 and 2017,2020, respectively.
(8)(9)Adjusted interest expense representsconsists of interest expense plus net accrued periodic interest rate swapderivative cash settlements interest expense during the period. Net accrued periodic derivative cash settlementssettlement interest amounts are reported on our consolidated statements of operations as a component of derivative gains (losses). Adjusted average cost is calculated based on adjusted interest expense for the period divided by total average interest-bearing liabilities during the period.
(9)(10)Adjusted net interest yield is calculated based on adjusted net interest income for the period divided by total average interest-earning assets for the period.


Table 23 displays the change in net interest income between periods and the extent to which the variance for each category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities is attributable to:to (i) changes in volume, which represents the volumechange in the average balances of our interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities or volume, and (ii) changes in the rate, which represents the change in the average interest rates of these assets and liabilities. The table also presents the change in adjusted net interest income between periods. Changes that are not solely due to either volume or rate are allocated to these categories on a pro-rata basis based on the absolute value of the change due to average volume and average rate.




40


Table 2:3: Rate/Volume Analysis of Changes in Interest Income/Interest Expense
 2022 versus 20212021 versus 2020
 Total
Variance Due To:(1)
Total
Variance Due To:(1)
(Dollars in thousands)VarianceVolumeRateVarianceVolumeRate
Interest income:      
Long-term fixed-rate loans$10,699 $41,948 $(31,249)$7,606 $47,527 $(39,921)
Long-term variable-rate loans1,919 2,396 (477)(16,317)(8,625)(7,692)
Line of credit loans11,291 11,429 (138)(19,544)(2,961)(16,583)
TDR loans(55)(61)6 (46)(68)22 
Other, net(67) (67)(77)— (77)
Total loans23,787 55,712 (31,925)(28,378)35,873 (64,251)
Cash, time deposits and investment securities855 (646)1,501 (6,307)(1,716)(4,591)
Total interest income$24,642 $55,066 $(30,424)$(34,685)$34,157 $(68,842)
Interest expense:    
Commercial paper$2,756 $1,431 $1,325 $(37,383)$(2,535)$(34,848)
Other short-term borrowings779 (425)1,204 (25,882)6,355 (32,237)
Short-term borrowings3,535 1,006 2,529 (63,265)3,820 (67,085)
Medium-term notes(4,813)27,629 (32,442)(12,372)12,504 (24,876)
Collateral trust bonds(835)4,021 (4,856)(8,148)(8,861)713 
Guaranteed Underwriter Program notes payable1,763 512 1,251 4,474 16,479 (12,005)
Farmer Mac notes payable4,427 3,854 573 (36,799)(4,172)(32,627)
Other notes payable(86)(82)(4)(430)(280)(150)
Subordinated deferrable debt(10)10 (20)24 15 
Subordinated certificates(510)(1,084)574 (2,510)(3,340)830 
Total interest expense3,471 35,866 (32,395)(119,026)16,159 (135,185)
Net interest income$21,171 $19,200 $1,971 $84,341 $17,998 $66,343 
Adjusted net interest income:
Interest income$24,642 $55,066 $(30,424)$(34,685)$34,157 $(68,842)
Interest expense3,471 35,866 (32,395)(119,026)16,159 (135,185)
Net periodic derivative cash settlements interest expense(2)
(14,260)(8,367)(5,893)59,772 (6,137)65,909 
Adjusted interest expense(3)
(10,789)27,499 (38,288)(59,254)10,022 (69,276)
Adjusted net interest income$35,431 $27,567 $7,864 $24,569 $24,135 $434 
  2019 vs. 2018 2018 vs. 2017
  Total
Variance due to:(1)
 Total 
Variance due to:(1)
(Dollars in thousands) Variance Volume Rate Variance Volume Rate
Interest income:            
Long-term fixed-rate loans $11,785
 $10,714
 $1,071
 $20,319
 $30,172
 $(9,853)
Long-term variable-rate loans 14,067
 4,913
 9,154
 7,250
 3,149
 4,101
Line of credit loans 19,652
 5,639
 14,013
 12,806
 6,279
 6,527
Restructured loans (43) (48) 5
 (16) (92) 76
Other income, net 57
 
 57
 (103) 
 (103)
Total loans 45,518
 21,218
 24,300
 40,256
 39,508
 748
Cash, time deposits and investment securities 12,795
 7,516
 5,279
 467
 (3,425) 3,892
Interest income $58,313
 $28,734
 $29,579
 $40,723
 $36,083
 $4,640
             
Interest expense:            
Short-term borrowings $42,238
 $6,678
 $35,560
 $23,932
 $917
 $23,015
Medium-term notes 21,983
 15,041
 6,942
 12,792
 476
 12,316
Collateral trust bonds (62,666) (12,792) (49,874) (4,775) 15,513
 (20,288)
Guaranteed Underwriter Program notes payable 7,344
 2,526
 4,818
 (2,110) 2,427
 (4,537)
Farmer Mac notes payable 34,938
 4,971
 29,967
 22,516
 3,177
 19,339
Other notes payable (272) (255) (17) (271) (252) (19)
Subordinated deferrable debt 967
 888
 79
 4
 7
 (3)
Subordinated certificates (1,058) (1,148) 90
 (1,091) (1,547) 456
Interest expense 43,474
 15,909
 27,565
 50,997
 20,718
 30,279
Net interest income $14,839
 $12,825
 $2,014
 $(10,274) $15,365
 $(25,639)
             
Adjusted net interest income:            
Interest income $58,313
 $28,734
 $29,579
 $40,723
 $36,083
 $4,640
Interest expense 43,474
 15,909
 27,565
 50,997
 20,718
 30,279
Net accrued periodic derivative cash settlements expense(2)
 (30,670) 1,047
 (31,717) (10,197) 1,802
 (11,999)
Adjusted interest expense(3)
 12,804
 16,956
 (4,152) 40,800
 22,520
 18,280
Adjusted net interest income $45,509
 $11,778
 $33,731
 $(77) $13,563
 $(13,640)
____________________________
____________________________
(1)The changes for each category of interest income and interest expense are divided betweenrepresent changes in either average balances (volume) or average rates for both interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. We allocate the portion of change attributable to the variance in volume and the portion of change attributable to the variance in rate for that category. The amount attributable to the combined impact of volume and rate has been allocated to each category based on the proportionate absolute dollar amount of change for that category.rate variance.
(2)For the net accrued periodic derivative cash settlements interest amount, the variance due to average volume represents the change in the net periodic derivative cash settlements interest expense amount resulting from the change in the average notional amount of derivative contracts outstanding. The variance due to average rate represents the change in the net periodic derivative cash settlements amount resulting from the net difference between the average rate paid and the average rate received for interest rate swaps during the period.
(3) See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” for additional information on our adjusted non-GAAP measures.






41


Reported Net Interest Income


Reported net interest income of $299$436 million for fiscal year 2019 was up $152022 increased $21 million, or 5%, from fiscal year 2018,2021, driven by an increase in average interest-earning assets of 4%$1,629 million, or 6%, coupled with an increasepartially offset by a decrease in the net interest yield of 2% (21% (1 basis points)point) to 1.14%1.46%.



Average Interest-Earning Assets:The increase in average interest-earning assets of 4%6% during fiscal year 20192022 was primarily attributable to growth in average total loans of $616$1,663 million, or 2%6%, over the priorfrom fiscal year 2021, driven by an increase in average long-term fixed-rate loans of $996 million and an expansionincrease in average line of our investment securities portfolio.
credit loans of $522 million. The continued low interest rate environment presented an opportunity for members to obtain long-term loan advances to fund capital investments at a low fixed rate of interest. The increase in average line of credit loans was mainly attributable to loan advances to one distribution member that experienced an adverse financial impact from restoration costs incurred to repair damage caused by two successive hurricanes and loan advances to several CFC Texas-based power supply borrowers that were subject to elevated power costs during the February 2021 polar vortex.


Net Interest Yield: The increase of 2 basis points in the net interest yield in fiscal year 2019 reflectedof 1 basis point, or 1%, was primarily attributable to the combined impact of an increasea decrease in the average yield on interest-earning assets of 713 basis points to 4.31%3.82% and a reduction in the benefit from non-interest bearing funding of 1 basis point to 0.17%, which was partiallywere largely offset by an increasea reduction in theour average cost of fundsborrowings of 613 basis points to 3.36%2.53%. The increasedecreases in the average yield on interest-earning assets was primarily attributable to higher rates on our line of credit and variable-rate loans due to a rise in short-term interest rates. On July 12, 2018, we early redeemed $300 million aggregate principal amount of our 10.375% collateral trust bonds and repaid the remaining $700 million principal amount of these bonds on the maturity date of November 1, 2018. We replaced this high-cost debt with lower-cost funding. While we experienced an overall increase in our average cost of fundsborrowings reflected the impact of the continued low interest rate environment during fiscal year 2019, largely due to the increase in the average cost of our short-term and variable-rate funding, the cost savings from the repayment of the 10.375% collateral trust bonds and replacement with lower-cost funding mitigated this increase. The 3-month London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) and federal funds target rate, which are benchmark rates used as references in establishing pricing for line of credit and variable-rate loans and determining the cost of our short-term and variable-rate borrowings, were both 2.50% as of May 31, 2019. The 3-month LIBOR rate was up 18 basis points from May 31, 2018, while the federal funds target rate was up 75 basis points.
2022.


Adjusted Net Interest Income


Adjusted net interest income of $256$334 million for fiscal year 2019 was up $462022 increased $35 million, or 22%12%, from fiscal year 2018,2021, driven by the combined impact of an increase in average interest-earning assets of $1,629 million, or 6%, and an increase in the adjusted net interest yield of 17% (146 basis points)points, or 6%, to 0.97% and the1.12%.

Average Interest-Earning Assets: The increase in average interest-earning assets of 4%. 6% was driven by the growth in average total loans of $1,663 million, or 6%, from fiscal year 2021, primarily attributable to an increase in average long-term fixed-rate and line of credit loans as discussed above.

Adjusted Net Interest Yield: The increase in the adjusted net interest yield was primarily due toof 6 basis points, or 6%, reflected the combinedfavorable impact of an increasea reduction in our adjusted average cost of borrowings of 20 basis points to 2.89%, which was partially offset by a decrease in the average yield on interest-earning assets of 713 basis points to 4.31% and a reduction in our adjusted average cost3.82%, both of funds of 7 basis points to 3.54%. As noted above, the increase in the average yield on interest-earning assets was attributable to higher rates on our line of credit and variable-rate loans due to the rise in short-term interest rates. The reduction in our adjusted average cost of funds was largelywhich were attributable to the cost savings fromlower interest rate environment during fiscal year 2022.

We include the early redemption and maturity of the $1 billion aggregate principal amount of the 10.375% collateral trust bonds, the replacement of this debt with lower-cost funding and a decrease in net periodic derivative cash settlements interest expense amounts. Together these amounts more than offset the increase in the average cost of our short-term, variable-rate borrowings resulting from higher short-term interest rates throughout the fiscal year.

Net periodic derivative cash settlements expense totaled $44 million in fiscal year 2019, a decrease of $31 million, or 41%, from $74 million in fiscal years 2018. Pay-fixed swaps represent the substantial majority of our derivatives portfolio. The floating rate payments on our interest rate swaps are typically determined based on the 3-month LIBOR. The increase in the 3-month LIBOR rate resulted in an increase in the periodic floating rate interest payments due to us on our pay-fixed, receive-variable swaps and a significant reduction in our net periodic derivative cash settlements expense in fiscal year 2019.

We include net accrued periodic derivative cash settlements during the period in the calculation of our adjusted average cost of funds,borrowings, which, as a result, also impacts the calculation of adjusted net interest income and adjusted net interest yield. We recorded net periodic derivative cash settlements interest expense of $101 million for fiscal year 2022, compared with $116 million and $56 million for fiscal years 2021 and 2020.

The floating-rate payments on our interest rate swaps are typically based on 3-month LIBOR. Because our derivative portfolio consists of a higher proportion of pay-fixed swaps than receive-fixed swaps, the net periodic derivative cash settlements interest expense amounts generally change based on changes in the floating interest amount received each period. When the 3-month LIBOR rate increases during the period, the received floating interest amounts on our pay-fixed swaps increase and, conversely, when the 3-month LIBOR swap rate decreases, the received floating interest amounts on our pay-fixed swaps decrease. The 3-month LIBOR rate began to increase during the second half of fiscal year 2022, resulting in an increase in received floating interest amounts and contributing to lower net periodic derivative cash settlements interest expense amounts in the current fiscal year. In contrast, the 3-month LIBOR rate decreased during fiscal year 2021 resulting in a reduction in received floating interest amounts and contributing to higher net periodic derivative cash settlements interest expense amounts in the prior fiscal year.

See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” for additional information on our adjusted measures, including a reconciliation of these measures to the most comparable U.S. GAAP measures.



42


Provision for LoanCredit Losses


Our provisionprovision for loancredit losses in each period is primarily driven by the levelchanges in our measurement of allowance that we determine is necessarylifetime expected credit losses for probable incurred loan losses inherent in our loan portfolio as of each balance sheet date. Therecorded in the allowance for loancredit losses. Our allowance for credit losses was $18and allowance coverage ratio were $68 million and $19 million0.22%, respectively, as of May 31, 20192022. In comparison, our allowance for credit losses and 2018, respectively.allowance coverage ratio were $86 million and 0.30%, respectively, as of May 31, 2021.


We recorded a benefit for loancredit losses of $1$18 million infor fiscal year 2019.2022. In comparison,contrast, we recorded a benefitprovision for credit losses of $18$29 million infor fiscal year 2018, which2021. The current fiscal year benefit was due to an allowance releaseprimarily attributable to increasesa decrease in the recovery rate assumptions used in determining the collective allowance, for our electric distribution and power supply loan portfolios. The increase in the recovery rate assumptions were based on management’s assessment of the most recent credit performance of electric utility loan portfolios, including consecutive fiscal years in which we had no payment defaults, delinquent loans, nonperforming


loans or charge-offs in our electric utility loan portfolios, and the overall credit quality of these portfolios. The credit quality and performance statistics of our loan portfolio continues to remain strong. We had no payment defaults or charge-offsstemming largely from positive developments during fiscal year 2019,2022 related to Rayburn that resulted in an improvement in Rayburn’s credit risk profile and no delinquent loans or nonperforming loansalso a significant reduction in our loans outstanding to Rayburn. In June 2021, Texas enacted securitization legislation that offers a financing program for qualifying electric cooperatives exposed to elevated power costs during the February 2021 polar vortex. In February 2022, Rayburn successfully completed a securitization transaction pursuant to this legislation to cover extraordinary costs and expenses incurred during the February 2021 polar vortex. Subsequent to the completion of the securitization transaction, Rayburn fully paid its outstanding obligations to ERCOT. As a result, we revised our borrower risk rating for Rayburn to a rating in the pass category from a previous rating in the criticized category. In addition, we received loan portfoliopayments from Rayburn during fiscal year 2022 that reduced our loans outstanding to Rayburn to $167 million as of May 31, 2019.2022, consisting of secured and unsecured loans outstanding of $151 million and $16 million, respectively. Loans outstanding to Rayburn totaled $379 million as of the prior fiscal year ended May 31, 2021, consisting of secured and unsecured loans outstanding of $167 million and $212 million, respectively.


The provision for credit losses of $29 million recorded for fiscal year 2021 reflected the allowance build due to the significant adverse financial impact on Brazos and Rayburn resulting from their exposure to elevated wholesale electric power supply costs during the February 2021 polar vortex.

We discuss our methodology for estimating the allowance for credit losses in “Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies—Allowance for Credit Losses—Current Methodology.” We also provide additional information on our allowance for loancredit losses below under section “Credit Risk—Allowance for LoanCredit Losses” and “Note 5��5—Allowance for LoanCredit Losses” of this Report. For additional information on our allowance methodology, see “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates” above and “Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” ofin this Report.


Non-Interest Income


Non-interest income consists of fee and other income, gains and losses on derivatives not accounted for in hedge accounting
relationships, and resultsgains and losses on equity and debt investment securities, which consists of operations of foreclosed assets.both unrealized and realized

gains and losses.

Table 34 presents the components of non-interest income (loss) recorded in our consolidated resultsstatements of operations for fiscal years 2019, 20182022, 2021 and 2017.2020.


Table 3:4: Non-Interest Income
 Year Ended May 31, Year Ended May 31,
(Dollars in thousands) 2019 2018 2017(Dollars in thousands)202220212020
Non-interest income (loss):      
Non-interest income components:Non-interest income components:
Fee and other income $15,355
 $17,578
 $19,713
Fee and other income$17,193 $18,929 $22,961 
Derivative gains (losses) (363,341) 231,721
 94,903
Derivative gains (losses)456,482 506,301 (790,151)
Results of operations of foreclosed assets 
 
 (1,749)
Unrealized losses on equity securities (1,799) 
 
Investment securities gains (losses)Investment securities gains (losses)(30,179)1,495 9,431 
Total non-interest income (loss) $(349,785) $249,299
 $112,867
Total non-interest income (loss)$443,496 $526,725 $(757,759)


The significant variancesvariance in non-interest income (loss) between fiscal years werewas primarily attributable to changes in netthe derivative gains (losses) recognized in our consolidated statements of operations. In addition, we experienced an unfavorable shift in unrealized investment securities gains of $32 million for the current fiscal year compared with the prior fiscal year. We



43


expect period-to-period market fluctuations in the fair value of our equity and debt investment securities, which we report together with realized gains and losses from the sale of investment securities on our consolidated statements of operations.

Derivative Gains (Losses)


Our derivative instruments are an integral part of our interest rate risk managementrisk-management strategy. Our principal purpose in using derivatives is to manage our aggregate interest rate risk profile within prescribed risk parameters. The derivative instruments we use primarily include interest rate swaps, which we typically hold to maturity. In addition, we may on occasion use treasury locks to manage the interest rate risk associated with debt that is scheduled to reprice in the future. The primary factors affecting the fair value of our derivatives and derivative gains (losses) recorded in our results of operations include changes in interest rates, the shape of the swap curve and the composition of our derivative portfolio. We generally do not designate our interest rate swaps, which currently account for the substantial majority ofall our derivatives, for hedge accounting. Accordingly, changes in the fair value of interest rate swaps are reported in our condensed consolidated statements of operations under derivative gains (losses). However, if we execute a treasury lock, we typically designate the treasury lockslock as a cash flow hedges. We did not have any derivatives designated as accounting hedges as of May 31, 2019.hedge.


We currently use two types of interest rate swap agreements: (i) we pay a fixed rate of interest and receive a variable rate of interest (“pay-fixed swaps”);, and (ii) we pay a variable rate of interest and receive a fixed rate of interest (“receive-fixed swaps”). The interest amounts are based on a specified notional balance, which is used for calculation purposes only.
The benchmark variable rate for the substantial majority of the floating ratefloating-rate payments under our swap agreements is 3-month LIBOR.

Table 4 displays the average notional amount outstanding, by swap agreement type, and the weighted-average interest rate paid and received for interest rate swap settlements during fiscal years 2019, 2018 and 2017. As indicated in Table 4, our derivative portfolio consists of a higher proportion of pay-fixed swaps than receive-fixed swaps. The profile of our interest


rate swap portfolio, however, may change as a result of changes in market conditions and actions taken to manage exposure to interest rate risk.

Table 4: Derivative Average Notional Amounts and Average Interest Rates
  Year Ended May 31,
  2019 2018 2017
(Dollars in thousands) 
Average
Notional
Balance
 
Weighted-
Average
Rate Paid
 
Weighted-
Average
Rate Received
 
Average
Notional
Balance
 
Weighted-
Average
Rate Paid
 
Weighted-
Average
Rate Received
 
Average
Notional
Balance
 
Weighted-
Average
Rate Paid
 
Weighted-
Average
Rate Received
Pay-fixed swaps $7,352,704
 2.83% 2.53% $7,007,207
 2.82% 1.58% $6,675,617
 2.89% 0.90%
Receive-fixed swaps 3,615,781
 3.15
 2.53
 3,808,794
 2.16
 2.60
 3,914,479
 1.34
 2.71
Total $10,968,485
 2.93% 2.53% $10,816,001
 2.58% 1.94% $10,590,096
 2.32% 1.57%

Pay-fixed swaps represented approximately 68% and 65% of the outstanding notional amount of our derivative portfolio as of May 31, 2019 and May 31, 2018, respectively. The average remaining maturity of our pay-fixed and receive-fixed swaps was 19 years and four years, respectively, as of May 31, 2019. In comparison, the average remaining maturity of our pay-fixed and receive-fixed swaps was 19 years and five years, respectively, as of May 31, 2018.

As interest rates decline, pay-fixed swaps generally decrease in value and result in the recognition of derivative losses, as the amount of interest we pay remains fixed, while the amount of interest we receive declines. In contrast, as interest rates rise, pay-fixed swaps generally increase in value and result in the recognition of derivative gains, as the amount of interest we pay remains fixed, but the amount we receive increases. With a receive-fixed swap, the opposite results occur as interest rates decline or rise. Our derivative portfolio consists of a higher proportion of pay-fixed swaps than receive-fixed swaps; therefore, we generally record derivative losses when interest rates decline and derivative gains when interest rates rise. Because our pay-fixed and receive-fixed swaps are referenced to different maturity terms along the swap curve, different changes in the swap curve—parallel, flattening, inversion or steepening—will also impact the fair value of our derivatives.
On July 20, 2021, we executed two treasury lock agreements with an aggregate notional amount of $250 million to lock in the underlying U.S. Treasury interest rate component of interest rate payments on anticipated debt issuances and repricings. The chart below provides comparative swap curvestreasury locks, which were scheduled to mature on October 29, 2021, were designated and qualified as cash flow hedges. In October 2021, we borrowed $250 million under our Farmer Mac revolving note purchase agreement and terminated the treasury locks. Prior to this anticipated borrowing and the termination of the treasury locks, we recorded changes in the fair value of the treasury locks in AOCI. At termination, the treasury locks were in a gain position of $5 million, of which $4 million is being accreted from AOCI to interest expense over the term of the related Farmer Mac borrowings and the remainder was recognized in earnings. We did not have any derivatives designated as accounting hedges as of May 31, 2019, 2018, 2017 and 2016.2022 or May 31, 2021.

chart-8499aadd833b5a84b3c.jpg____________________________
Benchmark rates obtained from Bloomberg.




Table 5 presents the components of net derivative gains (losses) recorded in our consolidated resultsstatements of operations.operations for fiscal years 2022, 2021 and 2020. Derivative cash settlements interest expense represents the net periodic contractual interest amount for our interest-rateinterest rate swaps forduring the reporting period. Derivative forward value gains (losses) represent the change in fair value of our interest rate swaps during the applicable reporting period due to changes in expected future interest rates over the remaining life of our derivative contracts.


Table 5: Derivative Gains (Losses)
Year Ended May 31,
(Dollars in thousands)202220212020
Derivative gains (losses) attributable to:
Derivative cash settlements interest expense$(101,385)$(115,645)$(55,873)
Derivative forward value gains (losses)557,867 621,946 (734,278)
Derivative gains (losses)$456,482 $506,301 $(790,151)



44


  Year Ended May 31,
(Dollars in thousands) 2019 2018 2017
Derivative gains (losses) attributable to:      
Derivative cash settlements expense $(43,611) $(74,281) $(84,478)
Derivative forward value gains (losses) (319,730) 306,002
 179,381
Derivative gains (losses) $(363,341) $231,721
 $94,903

The netWe recorded derivative lossesgains of $363$456 million infor fiscal year 2019 were primarily2022, attributable to increases in interest rates across the entire swap curve during the period. In contrast, we recorded derivative gains of $506 million for fiscal year 2021, driven by pronounced increases in medium- and longer-term swap rates, namely five-year to 30-year swap rates.

As noted above, the substantial majority of our swap portfolio consists of longer-dated, pay-fixed swaps. Therefore, increases and decreases in medium- and longer-term swap rates generally have a net decreasemore pronounced corresponding impact on the change in the net fair value of our pay-fixed swaps resulting from a declineswap portfolio. We present comparative swap curves, which depict the relationship between swap rates at varying maturities, for our reported periods in mediumTable 7 below.

Derivative Cash Settlements

As indicated in Table 5 above, and longer-term interest rates during the year, as depicted by the May 31, 2019 swap curve presented in thediscussed above chart. As medium and longer-term interest rates fell, short-term interest rates rose and exceeded medium and longer-term interest rates, resulting in an inverted yield curve beginning in March 2019. The rise in the 3-month LIBOR resulted in an increase in the floating rate payments due to us on our pay-fixed, receive-variable swaps, which drove a significant reduction in ourunder “Consolidated Results of Operations—Net Interest Income—Adjusted Net Interest Income,” we recorded net periodic derivative cash settlements interest expense amounts in fiscal year 2019.

The net derivative gains of $232$101 million in fiscal year 2018 resulted from a net2022, compared with $116 million for fiscal year 2021. The 3-month LIBOR rate began to increase during the second half of fiscal year 2022, resulting in an increase in received floating interest amounts and contributing to lower net periodic derivative cash settlements interest expense amounts in the fair valuecurrent fiscal year. In contrast, the 3-month LIBOR rate decreased during fiscal year 2021, resulting in a reduction in received floating interest amounts and contributing to higher net periodic derivative cash settlements interest expense amounts in the prior fiscal year.

Table 6 displays, by interest rate swap agreement type, the average notional amount and the weighted-average interest rate paid and received for the net periodic derivative cash settlements interest expense during each respective period. As discussed above, our derivative portfolio consists of a higher proportion of pay-fixed swaps than receive-fixed swaps, with pay-fixed swaps accounting for approximately 75% and 73% of the outstanding notional amount of our derivative portfolio as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

Table 6: Derivatives—Average Notional Amounts and Interest Rates
Year Ended May 31,
 202220212020
AverageWeighted-AverageWeighted-AverageWeighted-
NotionalAverage RateNotionalAverage RateNotionalAverage Rate
(Dollars in thousands)AmountPaidReceivedAmountPaidReceivedAmountPaidReceived
Interest rate swap type:
Pay-fixed swaps$6,145,318 2.61 %0.36 %$6,566,734 2.73 %0.27 %$7,092,961 2.82 %1.91 %
Receive-fixed swaps2,260,663 1.01 2.82 2,494,890 1.03 2.78 3,086,705 2.62 2.64 
Total$8,405,981 2.18 %1.03 %$9,061,624 2.26 %0.96 %$10,179,666 2.76 %2.13 %

The average remaining maturity of our pay-fixed and receive-fixed swaps primarily attributable to an increase in interestwas 19 years and three years, respectively, as of both May 31, 2022 and 2021.


















45


Comparative Swap Curves

Table 7 below provides comparative swap curves as of May 31, 2022, 2021, 2020 and 2019.

Table 7: Comparative Swap Curves
nru-20220531_g1.jpg____________________________
Benchmark rates across the swap curve.obtained from Bloomberg.


See “Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies—Derivative Instruments” and “Note 10—Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” for additional information on our derivative instruments. Also refer to “Note 14—Fair Value Measurement” for information on how we estimatemeasure the fair value of our derivative instruments.


Results of Operations of Foreclosed Assets

Results of operations of foreclosed assets consists of the operating results of entities controlled by CFC that hold foreclosed assets, impairment charges related to those entities, gains or losses related to the disposition of the assets and potential subsequent charges related to those assets. On July 1, 2016, we completed the sale of Caribbean Asset Holdings, LLC (“CAH”). As a result, we did not carry any foreclosed assets on our consolidated balance sheet as of May 31, 2019 or
May 31, 2018.

Non-Interest Expense


Non-interest expense consists of salaries and employee benefit expense, general and administrative expenses, gains (losses)and losses on the early extinguishment of debt and other miscellaneous expenses.


Table 68 presents the components of non-interest expense recorded in our consolidated resultsstatements of operations in fiscal years 2019, 20182022, 2021 and 2017.2020.






46


Table 6:8: Non-Interest Expense
 Year Ended May 31,
(Dollars in thousands)202220212020
Non-interest expense components:
Salaries and employee benefits$(51,863)$(55,258)$(54,522)
Other general and administrative expenses(43,323)(39,447)(46,645)
Operating expenses(95,186)(94,705)(101,167)
Losses on early extinguishment of debt(754)(1,456)(683)
Other non-interest expense(1,552)(1,619)(25,588)
Total non-interest expense$(97,492)$(97,780)$(127,438)
  Year Ended May 31,
(Dollars in thousands) 2019 2018 2017
Non-interest expense:      
Salaries and employee benefits $(49,824) $(51,422) $(47,769)
Other general and administrative expenses (43,342) (39,462) (38,457)
Gains (losses) on early extinguishment of debt (7,100) 
 192
Other non-interest expense (1,675) (1,943) (1,948)
Total non-interest expense $(101,941) $(92,827) $(87,982)


Non-interest expense of $102$97 million for fiscal year 2019 increased by $9 million, or 10%,2022 decreased slightly from fiscal year 2018. The increase was largely due to2021, as the lossdecrease in salaries and employee benefits and lower losses on the early extinguishment of debt, of $7 million, attributablewere largely offset by an increase in other general and administrative expenses as we resumed business travel and in-person corporate meetings and events that were cancelled during the prior fiscal year due to the premium for the early redemption of $300 million of the $1 billion collateral trust bonds.pandemic.


Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests


Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests represents 100% of the results of operations of NCSC and RTFC, as the members of NCSC and RTFC own or control 100% of the interest in their respective companies. The fluctuations in net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests are primarily due to changes in the fair value of NCSC’s derivative instruments recognized in NCSC’s earnings.


We recorded a net income attributable to noncontrolling interests of $3 million for fiscal year 2022. In comparison, we recorded a net income attributable to noncontrolling interests of $2 million for fiscal years 2021 and a net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests of $2$4 million for fiscal year 2020.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET ANALYSIS

Total assets increased $1,613 million, or 5%, in fiscal year 2019, compared with net income of $2 million in both fiscal years 2018 and 2017.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET ANALYSIS

Total assets of $27,1242022 to $31,251 million as of May 31, 2019 increased by $434 million, or 2%, from May 31, 2018,2022, primarily due to growth in our loan portfolio. TotalWe experienced an increase in total liabilities of $25,820$871 million, or 3%, to $29,109 million as of May 31, 2019 increased by $636 million, or 3%, from May 31, 2018,2022, largely due to the issuances of debt issuances to fund the growth in our loan growth.portfolio. Total equity decreased by $202increased $742 million during fiscal year 2019 to $1,304$2,142 million as of May 31, 2019,2022, attributable to our reported net lossincome of $151$799 million andfor the current fiscal year, which was partially offset by the CFC Board of Directors’ authorized patronage capital retirement in July 2021 of $48 million in August 2018.$58 million.
Following
Below is a discussion of changes in the major components of our assets and liabilities during fiscal year 2019.2022. Period-end balance sheet amounts may vary from average balance sheet amounts due to liquidity and balance sheet management activities that are intended to manage our liquidity requirements for the company and our customers, and our market risk exposure in accordance with our risk appetite.appetite framework.


Loan Portfolio


We segregate our loan portfolio into segments, by legal entity, based on the borrower member class, which consists of CFC distribution, CFC power supply, CFC statewide and associate, NCSC and RTFC. We offer both long-term loans that provide borrowers the option to select fixed- and variable-rate loan advances and line of credit loans. The substantial majorityloans to our borrowers. Under our long-term loan facilities, a borrower may select a fixed interest rate or a variable interest rate at the time of loans in our portfolio represent fixed-rate advances under secured long-term facilities with terms up to 35 years.each loan advance. Line of credit loans are typically variable-rate revolving loan facilities and are generally unsecured.have a variable interest rate. We describe and provide additional information on our member classes under “Item 1. Business—Members” and information about our loan programs and loan product types under “Item 1. Business—Loan and Guarantee Programs” in this Report.





47


Loans Outstanding


Table 7 summarizes9 presents loans outstanding by legal entity, member class and loan product type as of May 31, 2022 and 2021.

Table 9: Loans—Outstanding Amount by Member Class and Loan Type
May 31,
(Dollars in thousands)20222021
Member class:Amount% of TotalAmount% of TotalChange
CFC:    
Distribution$23,844,242 79 %$22,027,423 78 %$1,816,819 
Power supply4,901,770 17 5,154,312 18 (252,542)
Statewide and associate126,863  106,121 — 20,742 
CFC28,872,875 96 27,287,856 96 1,585,019 
NCSC710,878 2 706,868 4,010 
RTFC467,601 2 420,383 47,218 
Total loans outstanding(1)
30,051,354 100 %28,415,107 100 %1,636,247 
Deferred loan origination costs—CFC(2)
12,032 — 11,854 — 178 
Loans to members$30,063,386 100 %$28,426,961 100 %$1,636,425 
Loan type:
Long-term loans:    
Fixed-rate$26,952,372 90 %$25,514,766 90 %$1,437,606 
Variable-rate820,201 2 658,579 161,622 
Total long-term loans27,772,573 92 26,173,345 92 1,599,228 
Line of credit loans2,278,781 8 2,241,762 37,019 
Total loans outstanding(1)
30,051,354 100 %28,415,107 100 %1,636,247 
Deferred loan origination costs—CFC(2)
12,032  11,854 — 178 
Loans to members$30,063,386 100 %$28,426,961 100 %$1,636,425 
____________________________
(1) Represents the unpaid principal balance, net of charge-offs and recoveries, of loans as of the end of each period.
(2)Deferred loan origination costs are recorded on the books of CFC.

Loans to members totaled $30,063 million and $28,427 million as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Loans to CFC distribution and power supply borrowers accounted for 96% of total loans to members by loan type and by member class, for the five-year period endedas of both May 31, 2019. As indicated in Table 7,2022 and 2021, and long-term fixed-rate loans accounted for 89% and 90% of loans to members as of both May 31, 20192022 and 2018, respectively.



Table 7: Loans Outstanding by Type and Member Class
  May 31,
(Dollars in millions) 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015
Loans by type: Amount % of Total Amount % of Total Amount % of Total Amount % of Total Amount % of Total
Long-term loans:                    
Fixed-rate $23,094
 89% $22,696
 90 % $22,137
 91% $21,391
 93% $19,722
 92%
Variable-rate 1,067
 4
 1,040
 4
 847
 3
 757
 3
 699
 3
Total long-term loans 24,161
 93
 23,736
 94
 22,984
 94
 22,148
 96
 20,421
 95
Lines of credit 1,745
 7
 1,432
 6
 1,372
 6
 1,005
 4
 1,038
 5
Total loans outstanding $25,906
 100% $25,168
 100 % $24,356
 100% $23,153
 100% $21,459
 100%
Deferred loan origination costs 11
 
 11
 
 11
 
 10
 
 10
 
Loans to members $25,917
 100% $25,179
 100 % $24,367
 100% $23,163
 100% $21,469
 100%
                     
Loans by member class:                    
CFC:                    
Distribution $20,155
 78% $19,552
 78 % $18,825
 77% $17,674
 77% $16,095
 75%
Power supply 4,579
 18
 4,397
 18
 4,505
 19
 4,401
 19
 4,181
 20
Statewide and associate 84
 
 70
 
 58
 
 55
 
 65
 
CFC total 24,818
 96
 24,019
 96
 23,388
 96
 22,130
 96
 20,341
 95
NCSC 743
 3
 786
 3
 614
 3
 681
 3
 732
 3
RTFC 345
 1
 363
 1
 354
 1
 342
 1
 386
 2
Total loans outstanding $25,906
 100% $25,168
 100 % $24,356
 100% $23,153
 100% $21,459
 100%
Deferred loan origination costs 11
 
 11
 
 11
 
 10
 
 10
 
Loans to members $25,917
 100% $25,179
 100 % $24,367
 100% $23,163
 100% $21,469
 100%

Loans2021. The increase in loans to members totaled $25,917 million as of May 31, 2019, an increase of $738$1,636 million, or 3%6%, from May 31, 2018.2021, was attributable to net increases in long-term and line of credit loans of $1,599 million and $37 million, respectively. We experienced increases in CFC distribution loans, CFC statewide and power supplyassociate loans, increased by $603 million and $182 million, respectively, which was partially offset by a decrease in NCSC loans and RTFC loans of $43$1,817 million, $21 million, $4 million and $18 million, respectively. Long-term and line-of-credit revolving loans accounted for $425 million and $313$47 million, respectively, and a decrease in CFC power supply loans of the $738 million increase in loans. Based on our historical experience, however, long-term loans typically account for the substantial majority of loan growth.$253 million.


Long-term loan advances totaled $1,843$3,386 million during fiscal year 2019, with2022, of which approximately 87% of those advances80% was provided to members for capital expenditures byand 18% was provided to members for other expenses, primarily to fund operating expenses attributable to the elevated power cost obligations incurred during the February 2021 polar vortex. In comparison, long-term loan advances totaled $2,514 million during fiscal year 2021, of which approximately 86% was provided to members for capital expenditures and 10%8% was provided for the refinancing of loans made by other lenders. In comparison,Of the $3,386 million total long-term loans advanced during fiscal year 2022, $2,911 million were fixed-rate loan advances totaled $2,203with a weighted average fixed-rate term of 23 years.

Many rural electric distribution cooperatives have made or are making infrastructure investments that include building fiber optic lines to improve electric grid system reliability and efficiency, as fiber operations offers enhanced communication to monitor electric systems, identify outages and speed electric restoration. Some of these electric cooperatives are leveraging


48


these fiber assets to offer access to broadband services, either directly or by partnering with local telecommunication companies and others, to the communities they serve. Aggregate loans outstanding to CFC electric distribution cooperative members relating to broadband projects, which we started tracking in October 2017, increased to an estimated $1,647 million during fiscal year 2018, withas of May 31, 2022, from approximately 67%$854 million as of those advancesMay 31, 2021. Many of these broadband projects are also financially supported by various states and the federal government, which reduces the credit risk for capital expenditures by membersCFC and 24% for the refinancing of loans made by other lenders. The decreaseour electric cooperative members. We expect our member electric cooperatives to continue in long-term loan advances from the same prior-year period primarily resulted from weaker demand from borrowerstheir efforts to refinance other lender debt.expand broadband access to unserved and underserved communities.


We provide additional information on our loan product types in “Item 1. Business—Loan Programs” and“Note 4—Loans.” See “Debt—Collateral Pledged” below for information on encumbered and unencumbered loans and “Credit Risk Management” for information on the credit performance and risk profile of our loan portfolio.portfolio below under the section “Credit Risk—Loan Portfolio Credit Risk” in this Report. Also refer to “Item 1. Business—Loan and Guarantee Programs” and “Note 4—Loans” in this Report for addition information on our loans to members.”


Loan Loans—Retention Rate


Table 8 presentsLong-term fixed-rate loans accounted for 90% as of both May 31, 2022 and 2021 of our loans to members of $30,063 million and $28,427 million, respectively. Borrowers that select a comparisonfixed rate on a loan advance under a long-term loan facility have the option of choosing a term on the advance between one year and the historical retentionfinal maturity date of the loan. At the expiration of a selected fixed-rate term, or the repricing date, borrowers have the option of: (i) selecting CFC’s current long-term fixed rate for a term ranging from one year up to the full remaining term of the loan; (ii) selecting CFC’s current long-term variable rate; or (iii) repaying the loan in full.

The continued low interest rate environment over the last several years presented an opportunity for our members to obtain new long-term loan advances at a lower fixed-to-maturity interest rate or lock in a lower fixed interest rate to maturity at the repricing date on existing outstanding long-term loan advances. Because many of our members have locked in at or near historic low interest rates on outstanding loan advances for extended terms, the amount of long-term fixed-rate loans that repriced during each fiscal year over the last five fiscal years has gradually decreased, from $987 million in fiscal year 2017 to $379 million in fiscal year 2022. Long-term fixed-rate loans scheduled to reprice over the next 12 months totaled $338 million as of May 31, 2022, and long-term fixed-rate loans scheduled to reprice over the subsequent five fiscal years through the fiscal year ended May 31, 2027 totaled $1,584 million as of May 31, 2022, representing an average of $317 million per fiscal year.

CFC’s long-term fixed-rate loans that repriced in accordance with our standard loan repricing provisions totaled $379 million during fiscal year 2022. Of this total, $361 million, or 95%, was retained and the past three fiscal years and provides information on the percentage of loans that repriced to either another fixed-rate term or a variable rate.remaining amount was repaid. The average annual retention rate, is calculated based on the election made by the borrower at the repricing date. The average annual retention rate of CFC’sdate, was 97% for CFC loans that repriced loans has been 96% over the last three fiscal years.



Table 8: Historical Retention Rate and Repricing Selection(1)
  May 31,
  2019 2018 2017
(Dollars in thousands) Amount % of Total Amount % of Total Amount % of Total
Loans retained:            
Long-term fixed rate selected $568,252
 75% $741,792
 82% $824,415
 84%
Long-term variable rate selected 123,636
 16
 157,539
 17
 137,835
 14
Total loans retained by CFC 691,888
 91
 899,331
 99
 962,250
 98
Loans repaid(2)
 69,250
 9
 4,637
 1
 25,076
 2
Total $761,138
 100% $903,968
 100% $987,326
 100%
____________________________
(1) Does not include NCSC and RTFC loans.
(2) Includes loans totaling $1 million as of both May 31, 2018 and 2017 that were converted to new loans at the repricing date and transferred to a third party as part of our direct loan sale program. See “Note 4—Loans” for information on our sale of loans.

Scheduled Loan Principal Payments

Table 9 displays scheduled long-term loan principal payments as of May 31, 2019, forduring each of the fivethree fiscal years subsequent toended May 31, 2019 and thereafter.2022.

Table 9: Long-Term Loan Scheduled Principal Payments
  Fixed Rate Variable Rate  
(Dollars in thousands) Scheduled Principal Payments Weighted-Average Interest Rate Scheduled Principal Payments 
Total Scheduled Principal Payments(1)
Fiscal year:        
2020 $1,181,811
 4.42% $72,027
 $1,253,838
2021 1,179,099
 4.46
 49,686
 1,228,785
2022 1,180,497
 4.50
 50,727
 1,231,224
2023 1,177,197
 4.52
 42,846
 1,220,043
2024 1,136,044
 4.59
 48,153
 1,184,197
Thereafter 17,239,605
 4.67
 803,441
 18,043,046
Total $23,094,253
 4.62
 $1,066,880
 $24,161,133
____________________________
(1)Excludes line of credit loans.


Debt


We utilize both short-term borrowings and long-term debt as part of our funding strategy and asset/liability interest rate risk management. We seek to maintain diversified funding sources, including our members, affiliates, the capital markets and other funding sources, across products, programs and markets to manage funding concentrations and reduce our liquidity or debt rollover risk. Our funding sources include a variety of secured and unsecured debt securities in a wide range of maturities to our members, and affiliates, and in the capital markets.markets and other funding sources.


Debt Product Types


We offer various short- and long-term unsecured debt securities to our members and affiliates, including commercial paper, select notes, daily liquidity fund notes, medium-term notes and subordinated certificates. We also issue commercial paper, medium-term notes and collateral trust bonds in the capital markets. Additionally, we have access to funds under borrowing arrangements with banks, private placements and U.S. government agencies. Table 10 displays our primary funding sources and their selected key attributes.






49


Table 10: Debt—Debt Product Types
Debt Product Type:Maturity RangeMarketSecured/Unsecured
Short-term funding programs:
Commercial paper1 to 270 daysCapital markets, members and affiliatesUnsecured
Select notes30 to 270 daysMembers and affiliatesUnsecured
Daily liquidity fund notesDemand noteMembers and affiliatesUnsecured
Securities sold under repurchase agreements1 to 90 daysCapital marketsSecured
Other funding programs:
Medium-term notes9 months to 30 yearsCapital markets, members and affiliatesUnsecured
Collateral trust bonds(1)
Up to 30 yearsCapital marketsSecured
Guaranteed Underwriter Program notes payable(2)
Up to 2030 yearsU.S. governmentSecured
Farmer Mac notes payable(3)
Up to 30 yearsPrivate placementSecured
Other notes payable(4)
Up to 303 yearsPrivate placementBoth
Subordinated deferrable debt(5)
Up to 45 yearsCapital marketsUnsecured
Members’ subordinated certificates(6)
Up to 100 yearsMembersUnsecured
Revolving credit agreements3Up to 5 yearsBank institutionsUnsecured
____________________________
(1)Collateral trust bonds are secured by the pledge of permitted investments and eligible mortgage notes from distribution system borrowers in an amount at least equal to the outstanding principal amount of collateral trust bonds.
(2)Represents notes payable under the Guaranteed Underwriter Program, which supports the Rural Economic Development Loan and Grant program. The Federal Financing Bank provides the financing for these notes, and RUS provides a guarantee of repayment. We are required to pledge eligible mortgage notes from distribution and power supply system borrowers in an amount at least equal to the outstanding principal amount of the notes payable.
(3)We are required to pledge eligible mortgage notes from distribution and power supply system borrowers in an amount at least equal to the outstanding principal amount under note purchase agreements with Farmer Mac.
(4)Other notes payable consist of unsecured and secured Clean Renewable Energy Bonds and unsecured notes payable issued by NCSC.Bonds. We are required to pledge eligible mortgage notes from distribution and power supply system borrowers in an amount at least equal to the outstanding principal amount under the Clean Renewable Energy Bonds Series 2009A note purchase agreement.
(5)Subordinated deferrable debt is subordinate and junior to senior debt and debt obligations we guarantee, but senior to subordinated certificates. We have the right at any time, and from time to time, during the term of the subordinated deferrable debt to suspend interest payments for a maximum period of 20 consecutive quarters for $1,000 par notes, or a maximum period of 40 consecutive quarters for $25 par notes. To date, we have not exercised our option to suspend interest payments. We have the right to call the subordinated deferrable debt, at par, any time after 10 years for $1,000 par notes or 5 years for $25 par notes.
(6)Members’ subordinated certificates consist of membership subordinated certificates, loan and guarantee certificates and member capital securities, and are subordinated and junior to senior debt, subordinated debt and debt obligations we guarantee. Membership subordinated certificates generally mature 100 years subsequent to issuance. Loan and guarantee subordinated certificates have the same maturity as the related long-term loan. Some certificates also may amortize annually based on the outstanding loan balance. Member capital securities mature 30 years subsequent to issuance. Member capital securities are callable at par beginning either five or 10 years subsequent to the issuance and anytime thereafter.


Debt Outstanding


Table 11 displays the composition, by product type, of our outstanding debt and the weighted average interest rate as of May 31, 2019, 20182022 and 2017.2021. Table 11 also displays the composition of our debt based on several additional selected attributes.














50


Table 11: Total Debt Outstanding and Weighted-Average Interest Rates
May 31,
 20222021
(Dollars in thousands)Outstanding AmountWeighted-
Average
Interest Rate
Outstanding AmountWeighted-
Average
Interest Rate
Change
Debt product type:
Commercial Paper:
Members, at par$1,358,0690.92 %$1,124,6070.14 %$233,462
Dealer, net of discounts1,024,8130.96 894,9770.16 129,836
Total commercial paper2,382,8820.94 2,019,5840.15 363,298
Select notes to members1,753,4411.11 1,539,1500.30 214,291
Daily liquidity fund notes to members427,7900.80 460,5560.08 (32,766)
Securities sold under repurchase agreements 200,1150.30 (200,115)
Medium-term notes:
Members, at par667,4511.43 595,0371.28 72,414
Dealer, net of discounts5,241,6872.20 3,923,3852.31 1,318,302
Total medium-term notes5,909,1382.11 4,518,4222.17 1,390,716
Collateral trust bonds6,848,4903.17 7,191,9443.15 (343,454)
Guaranteed Underwriter Program notes payable6,105,4732.69 6,269,3032.76 (163,830)
Farmer Mac notes payable3,094,6792.33 2,977,9091.68 116,770
Other notes payable4,7141.80 8,2361.68 (3,522)
Subordinated deferrable debt986,5185.11 986,3155.11 203
Members’ subordinated certificates:
Membership subordinated certificates628,6034.95 628,5944.95 9
Loan and guarantee subordinated certificates365,3882.88 386,8962.89 (21,508)
Member capital securities240,1705.00 239,1705.00 1,000
Total members’ subordinated certificates1,234,1614.35 1,254,6604.32 (20,499)
Total debt outstanding$28,747,2862.54 %$27,426,1942.42 %$1,321,092
Security type:
Secured debt56 %61 %
Unsecured debt44 39 
Total100 %100 %
Funding source:
Members19 %18 %
Private placement:
Guaranteed Underwriter Program notes payable21 23 
Farmer Mac notes payable11 11 
Total private placement32 34 
Capital markets49 48 
Total100 %100 %
Interest rate type:
Fixed-rate debt77 %77 %
Variable-rate debt23 23 
Total100 %100 %
Interest rate type including the impact of swaps:
Fixed-rate debt(1)
91 % 93 % 
Variable-rate debt(2)
9   
Total100 %100 %
Maturity classification:(3)
Short-term borrowings17 % 17 % 
Long-term and subordinated debt(4)
83  83  
Total100 %100 %
____________________________


51


  May 31,
  2019 2018 2017
(Dollars in thousands) Outstanding Amount 
Weighted-
Average
Interest Rate
 Outstanding Amount 
Weighted-
Average
Interest Rate
 Outstanding Amount 
Weighted-
Average
Interest Rate
Debt product type:            
Commercial paper:            
Members, at par $1,111,795
 2.52% $1,202,105
 1.89% $928,158
 0.95%
Dealer, net of discounts 944,616
 2.46
 1,064,266
 1.87
 999,691
 0.93
Total commercial paper 2,056,411
 2.49
 2,266,371
 1.88
 1,927,849
 0.94
Select notes to members 1,023,952
 2.70
 780,472
 2.04
 696,889
 1.12
Daily liquidity fund notes to members 298,817
 2.25
 400,635
 1.50
 527,990
 0.80
Medium-term notes:            
Members, at par 625,626
 2.97
 643,821
 2.31
 612,951
 1.97
Dealer, net of discounts 2,942,045
 3.55
 3,002,979
 3.51
 2,364,671
 3.48
Total medium-term notes 3,567,671
 3.45
 3,646,800
 3.30
 2,977,622
 3.17
Collateral trust bonds 7,383,732
 3.19
 7,639,093
 3.89
 7,634,048
 4.08
Guaranteed Underwriter Program notes payable 5,410,507
 2.97
 4,856,143
 2.85
 4,985,484
 2.83
Farmer Mac notes payable 3,054,914
 3.33
 2,891,496
 2.88
 2,513,389
 1.71
Other notes payable 22,515
 3.46
 29,860
 3.42
 35,223
 3.55
Subordinated deferrable debt 986,020
 5.11
 742,410
 4.98
 742,274
 4.98
Members’ subordinated certificates:            
Membership subordinated certificates 630,474
 4.95
 630,448
 4.94
 630,098
 4.94
Loan and guarantee subordinated certificates 505,485
 2.95
 528,386
 2.93
 567,830
 3.02
Member capital securities 221,170
 5.00
 221,148
 5.00
 221,097
 5.00
Total members’ subordinated certificates 1,357,129
 4.21
 1,379,982
 4.18
 1,419,025
 4.18
Total debt outstanding $25,161,668
 3.24% $24,633,262
 3.25% $23,459,793
 3.07%
             
Security type:            
Unsecured debt 37%   37%   35%  
Secured debt 63
   63
   65
  
Total 100%   100%   100%  
             
Funding source:            
Members 18%   18%   18%  
Private placement:            
Guaranteed Underwriter Program notes payable 21
   20
   21
  
Farmer Mac notes payable 12
   12
   11
  
Total private placement 33
   32
   32
  
Capital markets 49
   50
   50
  
Total 100%   100%   100%  
             
Interest rate type:            
Fixed-rate debt 77%   74%   74%  
Variable-rate debt 23
   26
   26
  
Total 100%   100%   100%  
             
Interest rate type including the impact of swaps:            
Fixed-rate debt(1)
 93%   87%   87%  
Variable-rate debt(2)
 7
   13
   13
  
Total 100%   100%   100%  
             
Maturity classification:(3)
            
Short-term borrowings 14%   15%   14%  
Long-term and subordinated debt(4)
 86
   85
   86
  
Total 100%   100%   100%  


____________________________
(1) Includes variable-rate debt that has been swapped to a fixed rate, net of any fixed-rate debt that has been swapped to a variable rate.
(2) Includes fixed-rate debt that has been swapped to a variable rate, net of any variable-rate debt that has been swapped to a fixed rate. Also includes commercial paper notes, which generally have maturities of less than 90 days. The interest rate on commercial paper notes does not change once the note has been issued; however, the interest rate for new commercial paper issuances changes daily.
(3) Borrowings with an original contractual maturity of one year or less are classified as short-term borrowings. Borrowings with an original contractual maturity of greater than one year are classified as long-term debt.
(4) Consists of long-term debt, subordinated deferrable debt and total members’ subordinated debt reported on theour consolidated balance sheets. Maturity classification is based on the original contractual maturity as of the date of issuance of the debt.


OurWe issue debt primarily to fund growth in our loan portfolio. As such, our debt outstanding debt volume generally increases and decreases in response to member loan demand. As outstanding loan balances increased during the year ended May 31, 2019, our debt volume also increased. Total debt outstanding of $25,162increased $1,321 million, or 5%, to $28,747 million as of May 31, 2019, increased by $528 million, or 2%, from May 31, 2018,2022, due to an increase in borrowings to fund the increase in loans to members. The increase was primarily attributable to an increase in borrowings under the Guaranteed Underwriter Program of $554 million, a net increase in Farmer Mac notes payable of $163 million, a net increase in subordinated deferrable debt of $244 million and an aggregate increase in member commercial paper, select notes and daily liquidity fund notes of $51 million. These increases were partially offset by net decreases in collateral trust bonds of $255 million, a decrease inOutstanding dealer commercial paper outstanding of $120$1,025 million as of May 31, 2022 was within our quarter-end target range of $1,000 million and a net decreases in medium-term notes of $79$1,500 million.


Below is a summary of significant financing activities during fiscal year 2019.2022:


On July 12, 2018, we redeemed $300 million of the $1 billion 10.375% collateral trust bonds due November 1, 2018, at a premium of $7 million. We repaid the remaining $700 million of these bonds on the maturity date.
On July 26, 2018, we issued $300 million aggregate principal amount of dealer medium-term notes at a variable rate of 3-month LIBOR plus 37.5 basis points due 2021.
On October 31, 2018, we issued $325 million aggregate principal amount of 3.90% collateral trust bonds due 2028 and $300 million aggregate principal amount of 4.40% collateral trust bonds due 2048.
On November 15, 2018, we closed on a $750 million committed loan facility (“Series N”) from the Federal Financing Bank under the Guaranteed Underwriter Program.
On November 28, 2018,June 7, 2021, we amended the three-year and five-year committed bank revolving line of credit agreements to extend the maturity dates to November 28, 20212024 and November 28, 2023,2025, respectively, and to terminate certain third-party bank commitments.commitments totaling $70 million under the three-year agreement and $55 million under the five-year agreement. The terminations reduced the total commitment amount under the three-year facility to $1,245 million and the five-year facility to $1,355 million, resulting in an aggregate commitment amount under the two facilities of $2,600 million.
On January 31, 2019,October 18, 2021, we issued $450$400 million aggregate principal amount of 3.70% collateral trust bondsdealer medium-term notes at a fixed rate of 1.000%, due 2029on October 18, 2024, and $500$350 million aggregate principal amount of 4.30% collateral trust bondsdealer medium-term notes at a variable rate based on SOFR plus 0.33%, due 2049.on October 18, 2024.
In October 2021, November 2021, January 2022 and May 2022, we borrowed $250 million, $200 million, $170 million, and $100 million respectively, under the Farmer Mac revolving note purchase agreement.
In November 2021 and February 2022, we borrowed $200 million and $250 million, respectively, under the Guaranteed Underwriter Program.
On November 4, 2021, we closed on a $550 million committed loan facility (“Series S”) under the Guaranteed Underwriter Program. Pursuant to this facility, we may borrow any time before July 15, 2026. Each advance is subject to quarterly amortization and a final maturity not longer than 30 years from the date of the advance.
On November 15, 2021, we early redeemed all $400 million of our 3.05% Collateral Trust Bonds due February 15, 2022.
On February 7, 2022, we issued $600 million aggregate principal amount of dealer medium-term notes at a fixed rate of 1.875%, due on February 7, 2025, and $400 million aggregate principal amount of dealer medium-term notes at a variable rate based on SOFR plus 0.40%, due on August 7, 2023.
On February 7, 2022, we issued $500 million aggregate principal amount of 2.75% Collateral Trust Bonds due April 15, 2032.
On March 25, 2022, we early redeemed all $450 million of our 2.40% of Collateral Trust Bonds due April 25, 2022.
On May 6, 2019,4, 2022, we issued $250$300 million aggregate principal amount of 5.50% subordinated deferrable debtdealer medium-term notes at a fixed rate of 3.450%, due 2064, which isJune 15, 2025.
On May 9, 2022, we issued $100 million aggregate principal amount of dealer medium-term notes at a fixed for the liferate of the transaction and is callable at par on or after May3.859%, due June 15, 2024.2029.












52


Member Investments


Debt securities issued to our members represent an important, stable source of funding. Table 12 displays outstanding member debt outstanding, by debt product type, as of May 31, 20192022 and 2018.2021.




Table 12: Member Investments
May 31,Change
 20222021
(Dollars in thousands)Amount
% of Total (1)
Amount
% of Total (1)
Member investment product type:
Commercial paper$1,358,06957 %$1,124,60756 %$233,462 
Select notes1,753,441100 1,539,150100 214,291 
Daily liquidity fund notes427,790100 460,556100 (32,766)
Medium-term notes667,45111 595,03713 72,414 
Members’ subordinated certificates1,234,161100 1,254,660100 (20,499)
Total member investments$5,440,912 $4,974,010 $466,902 
Percentage of total debt outstanding19 % 18 %  
  May 31, Change
  2019 2018 
(Dollars in thousands) Amount 
% of Total (1)
 Amount 
% of Total (1)
 
Commercial paper $1,111,795
 54% $1,202,105
 53% $(90,310)
Select notes 1,023,952
 100
 780,472
 100
 243,480
Daily liquidity fund notes 298,817
 100
 400,635
 100
 (101,818)
Medium-term notes 625,626
 18
 643,821
 18
 (18,195)
Members’ subordinated certificates 1,357,129
 100
 1,379,982
 100
 (22,853)
Total outstanding member debt $4,417,319
   $4,407,015
   $10,304
           
Percentage of total debt outstanding 18%   18%    
____________________________
____________________________
(1) Represents outstanding debt attributable to members for each debt product type as a percentage of the total outstanding debt for each debt product type.


Member investments accounted for 19% and 18% of total debt outstanding as of both May 31, 20192022 and 2018.2021, respectively. Over the last three fiscal years, our member investments have averaged $5,173 million, calculated based on outstanding member investments as of the end of each quarterly reporting period have averaged $4,426 million.fiscal quarter during the period.

Short-Term Borrowings


Short-term borrowings consist of borrowings with an original contractual maturity of one year or less and do not include the current portion of long-term debt. Short-term borrowings totaled $3,608increased to $4,981 million as of May 31, 2022, from $4,582 million as of May 31, 2021, primarily due to an increase in short-term member investments, and accounted for 14%17% of total debt outstanding as of May 31, 2019, compared with $3,796 million, or 15%, of total debt outstanding as of May 31, 2018.each respective date. See “Liquidity Risk” below and “Note 6—Short-Term Borrowings” for information on the composition of our short-term borrowings.


Long-Term and Subordinated Debt


Long-term debt, defined as debt with an original contractual maturity term of greater than one year, primarily consists of medium-term notes, collateral trust bonds, notes payable under the Guaranteed Underwriter Program and notes payable under our Farmer Mac revolving note purchase agreement with Farmer Mac.agreement. Subordinated debt consists of subordinated deferrable debt and members’ subordinated certificates. Our subordinated deferrable debt and members’ subordinated certificates have original contractual maturity terms of greater than one year.


Long-term and subordinated debt totaled $21,554of $23,766 million and $22,844 million as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, accounted for 86%83% of total debt outstanding as of May 31, 2019, compared with $20,837 million, or 85%, of total debt outstanding as of May 31, 2018. As discussed above, the increase in total debt outstanding, including long-term and subordinated debt, was primarily due to the issuance of debt to fund the growth in our loan portfolio. See Table 32 in the “Liquidity Risk” section for a summary of long-term subordinated debt issuances and repayments for fiscal year 2019.

Collateral Pledged

We are required to pledge loans or other collateral in transactions under our collateral trust bond indentures, note purchase agreements with Farmer Mac and bond agreements under the Guaranteed Underwriter Program. We are required to maintain pledged collateral equal to at least 100% of the face amount of outstanding borrowings. However, as discussed below, we typically maintain pledged collateral in excess of the required percentage. Under the provisions of our committed bank revolving line of credit agreements, the excess collateral that we are allowed to pledge cannot exceed 150% of the outstanding borrowings under our collateral trust bond indentures, Farmer Mac note purchase agreements or the Guaranteed Underwriter Program. In certain cases, provided that all conditions of eligibility under the different programs are satisfied, we may withdraw excess pledged collateral or transfer collateral from one borrowing program to another to facilitate a new debt issuance.



Table 13 displays the collateral coverage ratios as of May 31, 2019 and 2018 for the debt agreements noted above that require us to pledge collateral.

Table 13: Collateral Pledged
  Requirement/Limit 
Actual(1)
  
Debt Indenture
Minimum
 
Committed Bank Revolving Line of Credit Agreements
Maximum
 May 31,
Debt Agreement   2019 2018
Collateral trust bonds 1994 indenture 100% 150% 118% 111%
Collateral trust bonds 2007 indenture 100
 150
 117
 114
Guaranteed Underwriter Program notes payable 100
 150
 114
 119
Farmer Mac notes payable 100
 150
 123
 115
Clean Renewable Energy Bonds Series 2009A 100
 150
 112
 109
____________________________
(1) Calculated based on the amount of collateral pledged divided by the face amount of outstanding secured debt.

Of our total debt outstanding of $25,162 million as of May 31, 2019, $15,858 million, or 63%, was secured by pledged loans totaling $18,877 million. In comparison, of our total debt outstanding of $24,633 million as of May 31, 2018, $15,398 million, or 63%, was secured by pledged loans totaling $18,145 million. Total debt outstanding on our consolidated balance sheet is presented net of unamortized discounts and issuance costs. However, our collateral pledging requirements are based on the face amount of secured outstanding debt, which does not take into consideration the impact of net unamortized discounts and issuance costs.

Table 14 displays the unpaid principal balance of loans pledged for secured debt, the excess collateral pledged and unencumbered loans as of May 31, 2019 and 2018.

Table 14: Unencumbered Loans
  May 31,
(Dollars in thousands) 2019 2018
Total loans outstanding(1)
 $25,905,664
 $25,167,494
Less: Loans required to be pledged for secured debt (2)
 (16,137,357) (15,677,138)
   Loans pledged in excess of requirement(2)(3)
 (2,739,248) (2,467,444)
   Total pledged loans $(18,876,605) $(18,144,582)
Unencumbered loans $7,029,059
 $7,022,912
Unencumbered loans as a percentage of total loans 27% 28%
____________________________
(1)Represents the unpaid principal amount of loans as of the end of each period presented and excludes unamortized deferred loan origination costs of $11 million as of both May 31, 2019 and 2018.
(2)Reflects unpaid principal balance of pledged loans.
(3)Excludes cash collateral pledged to secure debt. If there is an event of default under most of our indentures, we can only withdraw the excess collateral
if we substitute cash or permitted investments of equal value.

As displayed above in Table 14, we had excess loans pledged as collateral totaling $2,739 million and $2,467 million as of May 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. We typically pledge loans in excess of the required amount for the following reasons: (i) our distribution and power supply loans are typically amortizing loans that require scheduled principal payments over the life of the loan, whereas the debt securities issued under secured indentures and agreements typically have bullet maturities; (ii) distribution and power supply borrowers have the option to prepay their loans; and (iii) individual loans may become ineligible for various reasons, some of which may be temporary.

respective date. We provide additional information on our borrowings, includinglong-term debt below under the maturity profile, below insection “Liquidity Risk.” Refer to “Note 4—Loans—Pledging of Loans” for additional information related to pledged collateral. Also refer to “Note 6—Short-


Term Borrowings,”Risk” and “Note 7—Long-Term Debt,”Debt” and “Note 8—Subordinated Deferrable Debt” and “Note 9—Members’ Subordinated Certificates” for additional information on each of our debt product types.in this Report.










53


Equity


Table 1513 presents the components of total CFC equity and total equity as of May 31, 20192022 and 2018.2021.


Table 15:13: Equity
May 31,Change
(Dollars in thousands)20222021
Equity components:
Membership fees and educational fund:
Membership fees$970 $968 $
Educational fund2,417 2,157 260 
Total membership fees and educational fund3,387 3,125 262 
Patronage capital allocated954,988 923,970 31,018 
Members’ capital reserve1,062,286 909,749 152,537 
Total allocated equity2,020,661 1,836,844 183,817 
Unallocated net income (loss):
Prior fiscal year-end cumulative derivative forward value losses(1)
(461,162)(1,079,739)618,577 
Year-to-date derivative forward value gains(1)
553,525 618,577 (65,052)
Period-end cumulative derivative forward value gains (losses)(1)
92,363 (461,162)553,525 
Other unallocated net loss(709)(709)— 
Unallocated net income (loss)91,654 (461,871)553,525 
CFC retained equity2,112,315 1,374,973 737,342 
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)2,258 (25)2,283 
Total CFC equity2,114,573 1,374,948 739,625 
Noncontrolling interests27,396 24,931 2,465 
Total equity$2,141,969 $1,399,879 $742,090 
  May 31, Change
(Dollars in thousands) 2019 2018 
Membership fees and educational fund:      
Membership fees $969
 $969
 $
Educational fund 2,013
 1,976
 37
Total membership fees and educational fund 2,982
 2,945
 37
Patronage capital allocated 860,578
 811,493
 49,085
Members’ capital reserve 759,097
 687,785
 71,312
Total allocated equity 1,622,657
 1,502,223
 120,434
Unallocated net income (loss):     

Prior year-end cumulative derivative forward value losses (30,831) (332,525) 301,694
Current year derivative forward value gains (losses)(1)
 (318,134) 301,694
 (619,828)
Current year-end cumulative derivative forward value losses (348,965) (30,831) (318,134)
Other unallocated net income (loss) 3,190
 (5,603) 8,793
Unallocated net loss (345,775) (36,434) (309,341)
CFC retained equity 1,276,882
 1,465,789
 (188,907)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (147) 8,544
 (8,691)
Total CFC equity 1,276,735
 1,474,333
 (197,598)
Noncontrolling interests 27,147
 31,520
 (4,373)
Total equity $1,303,882
 $1,505,853
 $(201,971)
____________________________
____________________________
(1)Represents derivative forward value gains (losses) for CFC only, as total CFC equity does not include the noncontrolling interests of the variable interest entities NCSC and RTFC, which we are required to consolidate. SeeWe present the consolidated total derivative forward value gains (losses) in Table 37 in the “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” section below. Also, see “Note 15—16—Business Segments” for the statements of operations for CFC.


TotalThe increase in total equity decreased by $202of $742 million during fiscal year 2019 to $1,304$2,142 million as of May 31, 2019,2022 was attributable to our reported net lossincome of $151$799 million andfor fiscal year 2022, partially offset by the CFC Board of Directors’ authorized patronage capital retirement in July 2021 of $48 million$58 million.

Allocation and Retirement of Patronage Capital

We are subject to District of Columbia law governing cooperatives, under which CFC is required to make annual allocations of net earnings, if any, in August 2018.

In July 2019,accordance with the provisions of the District of Columbia statutes. District of Columbia cooperative law requires cooperatives to allocate net earnings to patrons, to a general reserve in an amount sufficient to maintain a balance of at least 50% of paid-up capital and to a cooperative educational fund, as well as permits additional allocations to board-approved reserves. District of Columbia cooperative law also requires that a cooperative’s net earnings be allocated to all patrons in proportion to their individual patronage and each patron’s allocation be distributed to the patron unless the patron agrees that the cooperative may retain its share as additional capital. Pursuant to these provisions, the CFC Board of Directors authorized the allocationis required to make annual allocations of fiscal year 2019 adjusted net income as follows: $97 million to members in the form of patronage capital; $71 million to the members’ capital reserve and $1 million to the cooperative educational fund. The amount of patronage capital allocated each year byearnings, if any. CFC’s Board of Directorsnet earnings for determining allocations is based on non-GAAP adjusted non-GAAP net income, which excludes the impact of derivative forward value gains (losses). We provide a reconciliation of our adjusted net income to our reported net income and an explanation of the adjustments below in “Non-GAAP Financial Measures.”




54


In May 2022, the CFC Board of Directors authorized the allocation of $1 million of net earnings for fiscal year 2022 to the cooperative educational fund. In July 2019,2022, the CFC Board of Directors authorized the allocation of fiscal year 2022 adjusted net income follows: $89 million to members in the form of patronage capital and $153 million to the members’ capital reserve. In July 2022, the CFC Board of Directors also authorized the retirement of patronage capital totaling $63$59 million, consisting of $48which $44 million which represented 50% of the patronage capital allocation for fiscal year 2019,2022 and $15 million which represented the portion of the allocation from fiscal year 19941997 net earnings that has been held for 25 years pursuant to the CFC Board of DirectorsDirectors’ policy. We expect to return the $63authorized patronage capital retirement amount of $59 million to members in cash in the firstsecond quarter of fiscal year 2020.2023. The remaining portion of the allocated amountpatronage capital allocation for fiscal year 2022 will be retained by CFC for 25 years underpursuant to the guidelines adopted by the CFC Board of Directors in June 2009.

In May 2021, the CFC Board of Directors authorized the allocation of $1 million of net earnings for fiscal year 2021 to the cooperative educational fund. In July 2018,2021 the CFC Board of Directors authorized the allocation of fiscal year 2021 adjusted net income as follows: $90 million to members in the form of patronage capital and $102 million to the members’ capital reserve. In July 2021, the CFC Board of Directors also authorized the retirement of patronage capital totaling $48$58 million, of which $45 million represented 50% of the patronage capital allocation for fiscal year 2018.2021 and $13 million represented the portion of the allocation from fiscal year 1996 net earnings that has been held for 25 years pursuant to the CFC Board of Directors’ policy. This amount was returned to members in cash in


August 2018. September 2021. The remaining portion of the allocated amountpatronage capital allocation for fiscal year 2021 will be retained by CFC for 25 years underpursuant to the guidelines adopted by the CFC Board of Directors in June 2009.


The CFC Board of Directors is required to make annual allocations of adjusted net income, if any. CFC has made annual retirements of allocated net earningsearnings in 3942 of the last 4043 fiscal years; however,however, future retirements of allocated amounts are determined based on CFC’s financial condition. The CFC Board of Directors has the authority to change the current practice for allocating and retiring net earnings at any time, subject to applicable laws. See “Item 1. Business—Allocation and Retirement of Patronage Capital” for additional information.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTSENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT

In the ordinary course of business, we engage in financial transactions that are not presented on our consolidated balance sheets, or may be recorded on our consolidated balance sheets in amounts that are different from the full contract or notional amount of the transaction. Our off-balance sheet arrangements consist primarily of guarantees of member obligations and unadvanced loan commitments intended to meet the financial needs of our members.

Guarantees

We provide guarantees for certain contractual obligations of our members to assist them in obtaining various forms of financing. We use the same credit policies and monitoring procedures in providing guarantees as we do for loans and commitments. If a member defaults on its obligation, we are obligated to pay required amounts pursuant to our guarantees. Meeting our guarantee obligations satisfies the underlying obligation of our member systems and prevents the exercise of remedies by the guarantee beneficiary based upon a payment default by a member. In general, the member is required to repay any amount advanced by us with accrued interest, pursuant to the documents evidencing the member’s reimbursement obligation. Table 16 displays the notional amount of our outstanding guarantee obligations, by guarantee type and by company, as of May 31, 2019 and 2018.

Table 16: Guarantees Outstanding
  May 31, Change
(Dollars in thousands) 2019 2018 
Guarantee type:      
Long-term tax-exempt bonds $312,190
 $316,985
 $(4,795)
Letters of credit 379,001
 343,970
 35,031
Other guarantees 146,244
 144,206
 2,038
Total $837,435
 $805,161
 $32,274
       
Company:  
    
CFC $826,117
 $793,156
 $32,961
NCSC 8,714
 10,431
 (1,717)
RTFC 2,604
 1,574
 1,030
Total $837,435
 $805,161
 $32,274

Of the total notional amount of our outstanding guarantee obligations of $837 million and $805 million as of May 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, 55% and 57%, respectively, were secured by a mortgage lien on substantially all of the assets and future revenue of our member cooperatives for which we provide guarantees.

In addition to providing a guarantee on long-term tax-exempt bonds issued by member cooperatives totaling $312 million as of May 31, 2019, we also were the liquidity provider on $247 million of those tax-exempt bonds. As liquidity provider, we may be required to purchase bonds that are tendered or put by investors. Investors provide notice to the remarketing agent that they will tender or put a certain amount of bonds at the next interest rate reset date. If the remarketing agent is unable to sell such bonds to other investors by the next interest rate reset date, we have unconditionally agreed to purchase such bonds. We were not required to perform as liquidity provider pursuant to these obligations during fiscal year 2019 or 2018.


We had outstanding letters of credit for the benefit of our members totaling $379 million as of May 31, 2019. These letters of credit relate to obligations for which we may be required to advance funds based on various trigger events specified in the letter of credit agreements. If we are required to advance funds, the member is obligated to repay the advance amount and accrued interest to us. In addition to these letters of credit, we had master letter of credit facilities in place under which we may be required to issue letters of credit to third parties for the benefit of our members up to an additional $53 million as of May 31, 2019. All of our master letter of credit facilities as of May 31, 2019 were subject to material adverse change clauses at the time of issuance. Prior to issuing a letter of credit under these facilities, we confirm that there has been no material adverse change in the business or condition, financial or otherwise, of the borrower since the time the loan was approved and that the borrower is currently in compliance with the letter of credit terms and conditions.

Table 17 presents the maturities for each of the next five fiscal years and thereafter of the notional amount of our outstanding guarantee obligations of $837 million as of May 31, 2019.

Table 17: Maturities of Guarantee Obligations
   Outstanding
Amount
 Maturities of Guarantee Obligations
(Dollars in thousands)  2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Thereafter
Guarantees $837,435
 $246,143
 $133,015
 $30,882
 $159,059
 $31,162
 $237,174

We recorded a guarantee liability of $14 million and $11 million as of May 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, for our guarantee and liquidity obligations associated with our members’ debt. We provide additional information about our guarantee obligations in “Note 13—Guarantees.”

Unadvanced Loan Commitments

Unadvanced loan commitments represent approved and executed loan contracts for which funds have not been advanced to borrowers. Our line of credit commitments include both contracts that are subject to material adverse change clauses and contracts that are not subject to material adverse change clauses, while our long-term loan commitments are typically subject to material adverse change clauses.

Table 18 displays the amount of unadvanced loan commitments, which consist of line of credit and long-term loan commitments, as of May 31, 2019 and 2018.

Table 18: Unadvanced Loan Commitments
  May 31, Change
  2019 2018 
(Dollars in thousands) Amount % of Total Amount % of Total 
Line of credit commitments:          
Conditional(1)
 $4,845,306
 37% $4,835,434
 38% $9,872
Unconditional(2)
 2,943,616
 22
 2,857,350
 23
 86,266
Total line of credit unadvanced commitments 7,788,922
 59
 7,692,784
 61
 96,138
Total long-term loan unadvanced commitments(1)
 5,448,636

41
 4,952,834
 39
 495,802
Total unadvanced loan commitments $13,237,558

100% $12,645,618
 100% $591,940
____________________________
(1)Represents amount related to facilities that are subject to material adverse change clauses.
(2)Represents amount related to facilities that are not subject to material adverse change clauses.

Table 19 presents the amount of unadvanced loan commitments, by loan type, as of May 31, 2019 and the maturities of the commitment amounts for each of the next five fiscal years and thereafter.





Table 19: Notional Maturities of Unadvanced Loan Commitments
  
Available
Balance
 Notional Maturities of Unadvanced Loan Commitments
(Dollars in thousands)  2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Thereafter
Line of credit $7,788,922
 $3,998,036
 $908,628
 $488,017
 $1,391,887
 $872,813
 $129,541
Long-term loans 5,448,636
 389,799
 736,621
 1,404,204
 1,210,164
 1,694,441
 13,407
Total $13,237,558
 $4,387,835
 $1,645,249
 $1,892,221
 $2,602,051
 $2,567,254
 $142,948

Unadvanced line of credit commitments accounted for 59% of total unadvanced loan commitments as of May 31, 2019, while unadvanced long-term loan commitments accounted for 41% of total unadvanced loan commitments. Unadvanced line of credit commitments are typically revolving facilities for periods not to exceed five years and generally serve as supplemental back-up liquidity to our borrowers. Historically, borrowers have not drawn the full commitment amount for line of credit facilities, and we have experienced a very low utilization rate on line of credit loan facilities regardless of whether or not we are obligated to fund the facility where a material adverse change exists.

Our unadvanced long-term loan commitments generally have a five-year draw period under which a borrower may advance funds prior to the expiration of the commitment. We expect that the majority of the long-term unadvanced loan commitments of $5,449 million will be advanced prior to the expiration of the commitment.

Because we historically have experienced a very low utilization rate on line of credit loan facilities, which account for the majority of our total unadvanced loan commitments, we believe the unadvanced loan commitment total of $13,238 million as of May 31, 2019 is not necessarily representative of our future funding requirements.

Unadvanced Loan Commitments—Conditional

The majority of our line of credit commitments and all of our unadvanced long-term loan commitments include material adverse change clauses. Unadvanced loan commitments subject to material adverse change clauses totaled $10,294 million and $9,789 million as of May 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, and accounted for 78% and 77% of the combined total of unadvanced line of credit and long-term loan commitments as of May 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Prior to making advances on these facilities, we confirm that there has been no material adverse change in the borrower’s business or condition, financial or otherwise, since the time the loan was approved and confirm that the borrower is currently in compliance with loan terms and conditions. In some cases, the borrower’s access to the full amount of the facility is further constrained by use of proceeds restrictions, imposition of borrower-specific restrictions, or by additional conditions that must be met prior to advancing funds. Since we generally do not charge a fee for the borrower to have an unadvanced amount on a loan facility that is subject to a material adverse change clause, our borrowers tend to request amounts in excess of their immediate estimated loan requirements.

Unadvanced Loan Commitments—Unconditional

Unadvanced loan commitments not subject to material adverse change clauses at the time of each advance consisted of unadvanced committed lines of credit totaling $2,944 million and $2,857 million as of May 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. For contracts not subject to a material adverse change clause, we are generally required to advance amounts on the committed facilities as long as the borrower is in compliance with the terms and conditions of the facility.

Syndicated loan facilities, where the pricing is set at a spread over a market index rate as agreed upon by all of the participating financial institutions based on market conditions at the time of syndication, accounted for 90% of unconditional line of credit commitments as of May 31, 2019. The remaining 10% represented unconditional committed line of credit loans, which under any new advance would be made at rates determined by us.

Table 20 presents the maturities for each of the next five fiscal years of the notional amount of unconditional committed lines of credit not subject to a material adverse change clause as of May 31, 2019.


Table 20: Maturities of Notional Amount of Unconditional Committed Lines of Credit
  
Available
Balance
 Notional Maturities of Unconditional Committed Lines of Credit
(Dollars in thousands)  2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
Committed lines of credit $2,943,616
 $340,361
 $451,865
 $191,634
 $1,239,917
 $719,839
RISK MANAGEMENT


Overview


We face a variety of risks that can significantly affect our financial performance, liquidity, reputation and ability to meet the expectations of our members, investors and other stakeholders. As a financial services company, the major categories of risk exposures inherent in our business activities include credit risk, liquidity risk, market risk and operational risk. These risk categories are summarized below.


Credit risk is the risk that a borrower or other counterparty will be unable to meet its obligations in accordance with agreed-upon terms.


Liquidity risk is the risk that we will be unable to fund our operations and meet our contractual obligations or that we will be unable to fund new loans to borrowers at a reasonable cost and tenor in a timely manner.


Market risk is the risk that changes in market variables, such as movements in interest rates, may adversely affect the match between the timing of the contractual maturities, re-pricing and prepayments of our financial assets and the related financial liabilities funding those assets.


Operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal controls, processes, systems, human error or external events.events, including natural disasters or public health emergencies, such as the current COVID-19 pandemic. Operational risk also includes cybersecurity risk, compliance risk, fiduciary risk, reputational risk and litigation risk.


Effective risk management is critical to our overall operations and to achieving our primary objective of providing cost-based financial products to our rural electric members while maintaining the sound financial results required for investment-grade credit ratings on our rated debt instruments. Accordingly, we have a risk-management framework that is intended to govern the principal risks we face in conducting our business and the aggregate amount of risk we are willing to accept, referred to as risk appetite and risk guidelines, in the context of CFC’s mission and strategic objectives and initiatives.



55


Risk-Management Framework


Our risk-managementEnterprise Risk Management (“ERM”) framework consists of a defined policies, procedurespolicy and risk tolerances that are intendedprocess for measuring, assessing and responding to alignkey risks in alignment with CFC’s mission. The CFCmission and CFC’s Board of Directors is responsibleDirector’s strategic objectives. The board of directors has responsibility for risk governance by approving the enterprise risk-managementoversight and strategic direction of the ERM framework and providing oversight on risk policies, risk appetitehas adopted a comprehensive risk-management policy that describes the roles and our performance against established goals.responsibilities of the board and management within this framework for identifying and managing risks. In fulfilling its risk governance responsibility,risk-management oversight duties, the CFC Boardboard of Directorsdirectors receives periodic reports on business activities and risk-management activities from management. TheThroughout the year at its periodic meetings, the CFC Board of Directors reviews CFC’s risk profileimportant trends and management’s assessment of thoseemerging developments across key risks throughout the year at its periodic meetings.as assessed, measured and evaluated by management. The board also establishes CFC’s loan policies and has established a Loan Committee of the board comprising no fewer than 10 directors that reviews the performance of the loan portfolio in accordance with those policies. For additional information about the role of the CFC Board of Directors in risk governance and oversight, see “Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.”


Management is responsibleprimarily accountable for execution of the risk-management framework, risk policy formationERM responsibilities and daily management of the risks associated with our business. Management executes its responsibility by establishing processes for identifying, measuring, assessing, managing, monitoring and reporting risks. Management and operating groups maintain policies and procedures, specific to each major risk category, to identify and measure our primary risk exposures at the transaction, obligor and portfolio levels and ensure that our exposures remain within prescribed limits. Management also is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal controls to mitigate key risks. We have a number of management-level risk oversight committees across the organization and groups within the organization that have a defined set of authorities and responsibilities specific to one or more risk types, including the Corporate Credit Committee, Credit Risk Management


group, Treasury group, Asset Liability Committee, Investment Management Committee, Corporate Compliance, Internal Audit group and Disclosure Committee. TheseManagement provides reports to the board of directors at each regularly scheduled board meeting, and more frequently as requested by the board of directors, relating to, among other things, the ongoing progress of managing risk oversight committeesat CFC given the ERM framework; management’s responses for the critical business risks identified during the risk assessment process and groups collectively help management facilitate enterprise-wide understandingthe status of any gaps or deficiencies; and monitoring of CFC’s risk profile and the control processes with respect to our inherent risks. Management and the risk oversight committees periodically report actual results, significant current andtrends, as well as emerging risks initiatives and risk-management concerns to the CFC Board of Directors.opportunities.

CREDIT RISK


Our loan portfolio, which represents the largest component of assets on our balance sheet, and guarantees accountaccounts for the substantial majority of our credit risk exposure. We also engage in certain non-lending activities that may give rise to counterparty credit and counterparty settlement risk, including the purchase of investment securities andsuch as entering into derivative transactions to manage interest rate risk. Our primary credit exposure is to rural electric cooperatives that provide essential electric services to end-users, the majority of which are residential customers. We also have a limited portfolio of loans to not-for-profitrisk and for-profit telecommunication companies.purchasing investment securities.


Credit Risk Management


We manage portfolio and borrower credit risk related to our loan portfolio consistent with credit policies established by the CFC Board of Directors and through credit underwriting, approval and monitoring processes and practices adopted by management. Our board-established credit policies include guidelines regarding the types of credit products we offer, limits on credit we extend to individual borrowers, approval authorities delegated to management, and use of syndications and loan sales. We maintain an internal risk rating system in which we assign a rating to each borrower and credit facility. We review and update the risk ratings at least annually. Assigned risk ratings inform our credit approval, borrower monitoring and portfolio review processes. Our Corporate Credit Committee approves individual credit actions within its own authority and together with our Credit Risk Management group, establishes standards for credit underwriting, oversees credits deemed to be higher risk, reviews assigned risk ratings for accuracy, and monitors the overall credit quality and performance statistics of our loan portfolio.


Loan Portfolio Credit Risk


Our primary credit exposure is loans to rural electric cooperatives, which provide essential electric services to end-users, the majority of which are residential customers. We also have a limited portfolio of loans to not-for-profit and for-profit telecommunication companies. As a member-owned finance cooperative, CFC’s principal focus is to provide funding to its rural electric utility cooperative members to assist them in acquiring, constructing and operating electric distribution systems, power supply systems and related facilities. Loans outstanding to electric utility organizations totaled $29,584 million and $27,995 million as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, representing 98% and 99% of total loans outstanding as of each respective date. The remaining loans outstanding in our loan portfolio were to RTFC members,


56


affiliates and associates in the telecommunications industry sector. The substantial majority of loans to our borrowers are long-term fixed-rate loans with terms of up to 35 years. Long-term fixed-rate loans accounted for 90% of total loans outstanding as of both May 31, 2022 and 2021.

Because we lend primarily to our rural electric utility cooperative members, we have had a loan portfolio inherently subject to single-industry and single-obligor credit concentration risk since our inception in 1969. We historically, however, have experienced limited defaults and losses in our electric utility loan portfolio due to several factors. First, the majority of our electric cooperative borrowers operate in states where electric cooperatives are not subject to rate regulation. Thus, they are able to make rate adjustments to pass along increased costs to the end customer without first obtaining state regulatory approval, allowing them to cover operating costs and generate sufficient earnings and cash flows to service their debt obligations. Second, electric cooperatives face limited competition, as they tend to operate in exclusive territories not serviced by public investor-owned utilities. Third, electric cooperatives typically are consumer-owned, not-for-profit entities that provide an essential service to end-users, the majority of which are residential customers. As not-for-profit entities, rural electric cooperatives, unlike investor-owned utilities, generally are eligible to apply for assistance from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (“FEMA”) and states to help recover from major disasters or emergencies. Fourth, electric cooperatives tend to adhere to a conservative core business strategy model that has historically resulted in a relatively stable, resilient operating environment and overall strong financial performance and credit strength for the electric cooperative network. Finally, we generally lend to our members on a senior secured basis, which reduces the risk of loss in the event of a borrower default.

Below we provide information on the credit risk profile of our loan portfolio, including security provisions, loancredit concentration, credit performancequality indicators and our allowance for loancredit losses.


Security Provisions


Except when providing line of credit loans, we generally lend to our members on a senior secured basis. Long-term loans are generally secured on parity with other secured lenders (primarily RUS), if any, by all assets and revenue of the borrower with exceptions typical in utility mortgages. Line of credit loans are generally unsecured. In addition to the collateral pledged to secure our loans, distribution and power supply borrowers also are required to set rates charged to customers to achieve certain specified financial ratios.

Table 2114 presents, by loan typelegal entity and member class and by company, the amount and percentage ofloan type, secured and unsecured loans in our loan portfolio as of May 31, 20192022 and 2018.2021. Of our total loans outstanding, 92% were secured and 8% were unsecured as of May 31, 2019. In comparison, of our total loans outstanding, 93% were secured and 7% were unsecured as of both May 31, 2018.2022 and 2021.






57


Table 21: 14: Loans—Loan Portfolio Security Profile(1)
May 31, 2022
(Dollars in thousands)Secured% of TotalUnsecured% of TotalTotal
Member class:
CFC:
Distribution$22,405,486 94 %$1,438,756 6 %$23,844,242 
Power supply4,455,098 91 446,6729 4,901,770 
Statewide and associate83,759 66 43,10434 126,863 
Total CFC26,944,343 93 1,928,532 7 28,872,875 
NCSC689,887 97 20,991 3 710,878 
RTFC454,985 97 12,616 3 467,601 
Total loans outstanding(1)
$28,089,215 93 $1,962,139 7 $30,051,354 
Loan type:
Long-term loans:
Fixed-rate$26,731,763 99 %$220,609 1 %$26,952,372 
Variable-rate817,866 100 2,335  820,201 
Total long-term loans27,549,629 99 222,944 1 27,772,573 
Line of credit loans539,586 24 1,739,195 76 2,278,781 
Total loans outstanding(1)
$28,089,215 93 $1,962,139 7 $30,051,354 
May 31, 2021
(Dollars in thousands)(Dollars in thousands)Secured% of TotalUnsecured% of TotalTotal
Member class:Member class:
CFC:CFC:
DistributionDistribution$20,702,657 94 %$1,324,766 %$22,027,423 
Power supplyPower supply4,458,311 86 696,00114 5,154,312 
Statewide and associateStatewide and associate88,004 83 18,11717 106,121 
Total CFCTotal CFC25,248,972 93 2,038,884 27,287,856 
NCSCNCSC662,782 94 44,086 706,868 
RTFCRTFC399,717 95 20,666 420,383 
Total loans outstanding(1)
Total loans outstanding(1)
$26,311,471 93 $2,103,636 $28,415,107 
Loan type:Loan type:
Long-term loans:Long-term loans:
Fixed-rateFixed-rate$25,278,805 99 %$235,961 %$25,514,766 
Variable-rateVariable-rate655,675 100 2,904 — 658,579 
Total long-term loansTotal long-term loans25,934,480 99 238,865 26,173,345 
Line of credit loansLine of credit loans376,991 17 1,864,771 83 2,241,762 
Total loans outstanding(1)
Total loans outstanding(1)
$26,311,471 93 $2,103,636 $28,415,107 
 May 31, 2019
(Dollars in thousands) Secured % of Total Unsecured % of Total Total
Loan type:          
Long-term loans:          
Long-term fixed-rate loans $22,674,330
 98% $419,923
 2% $23,094,253
Long-term variable-rate loans 1,058,434
 99
 8,446
 1
 1,066,880
Total long-term loans 23,732,764
 98
 428,369
 2
 24,161,133
Line of credit loans 121,741
 7
 1,622,790
 93
 1,744,531
Total loans outstanding $23,854,505
 92
 $2,051,159
 8
 $25,905,664
          
Company:          
CFC $22,861,414
 92% $1,956,262
 8% $24,817,676
NCSC 664,618
 89
 78,270
 11
 742,888
RTFC 328,473
 95
 16,627
 5
 345,100
Total loans outstanding $23,854,505
 92
 $2,051,159
 8
 $25,905,664
____________________________
  May 31, 2018
(Dollars in thousands) Secured % of Total Unsecured % of Total Total
Loan type:          
Long-term loans:          
Long-term fixed-rate loans $22,220,087
 98% $476,098
 2% $22,696,185
Long-term variable-rate loans 996,970
 96
 42,521
 4
 1,039,491
Total long-term loans 23,217,057
 98
 518,619
 2
 23,735,676
Line of credit loans 69,097
 5
 1,362,721
 95
 1,431,818
Total loans outstanding $23,286,154
 93
 $1,881,340
 7
 $25,167,494
           
Company:          
CFC $22,233,592
 93% $1,784,327
 7% $24,017,919
NCSC 703,396
 89
 83,061
 11
 786,457
RTFC 349,166
 96
 13,952
 4
 363,118
Total loans outstanding $23,286,154
 93
 $1,881,340
 7
 $25,167,494
____________________________
(1)Represents the unpaid principal amountbalance, net of charge-offs and recoveries of loans as of the end of each period presented and excludesperiod. Excludes unamortized deferred loan origination costs of $11$12 million as of both May 31, 20192022 and 2018.2021.


As part of our strategy in managing our credit risk exposure, we entered into a long-term standby purchase commitment agreement with Farmer Mac in fiscal year 2016. Under this agreement, we may designate certain loans to be covered under the commitment, as approved by Farmer Mac, and in the event any such loan later goes into payment default for at least 90 days, upon request by us, Farmer Mac must purchase such loan at par value. The outstanding principal balance of loans covered under this agreement totaled $619 million as of May 31, 2019, compared with $660 million as of May 31, 2018. No loans have been put to Farmer Mac for purchase pursuant to this agreement. Our credit exposure is also mitigated by long-term loans guaranteed by RUS. Guaranteed RUS loans totaled $154 million and $161 million as of May 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.







58


Credit ConcentrationQuality


ConcentrationsWe believe the overall credit quality of our loan portfolio remained strong as of May 31, 2022. Historically, we have had limited defaults and losses on loans in our electric utility loan portfolio largely because of the essential nature of the service provided by electric utility cooperatives as well as other factors, such as limited rate regulation and competition, which we discuss further in the section “Credit Risk—Loan Portfolio Credit Risk.” In addition, we generally lend to members on a senior secured basis, which reduces the risk of loss in the event of a borrower default. Loans outstanding to electric utility organizations of $29,584 million and $27,995 million as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, represented approximately 98% and 99% of total loans outstanding as of each respective date. Of our total loans outstanding, 93% were secured as of both May 31, 2022 and 2021.

We had loans to three borrowers totaling $228 million classified as nonperforming as of May 31, 2022. In comparison we had loans to four borrowers totaling $237 million classified as nonperforming as of May 31, 2021. Nonperforming loans represented 0.76% and 0.84% of total loans outstanding as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The reduction in nonperforming loans of $9 million during fiscal year 2022 was due in part to our receipt during fiscal year 2022 of full payment of all amounts due on nonperforming loans to two RTFC borrowers totaling $9 million. In addition, we have


30


continued to receive payments on the remaining outstanding nonperforming loan to a CFC electric power supply borrower, including payments totaling $29 million during fiscal year 2022, which reduced the balance of this loan to $114 million as of May 31, 2022, from $143 million as of May 31, 2021. These reductions were partially offset by the classification during the fiscal quarter ended May 31, 2022 (the “fourth quarter of fiscal year 2022”) of the $28 million loan outstanding to Brazos Sandy Creek Electric Cooperative Inc. (“Brazos Sandy Creek”) as nonperforming following its bankruptcy filing, as discussed below.

Loans outstanding to Brazos, which filed for bankruptcy in March 2021 due to its exposure to elevated wholesale electric power costs during the February 2021 polar vortex, accounted for $86 million and $85 million of our total nonperforming loans as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Brazos is not permitted to make scheduled loan payments without approval of the bankruptcy court. As a result, we have not received payments from Brazos since March 2021, and its loans outstanding to us were delinquent as of each respective date.

On March 18, 2022, Brazos Sandy Creek, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Brazos and a CFC Texas-based electric power supply borrower, filed for bankruptcy following the filing of a motion by Brazos to reject its power purchase agreement with Brazos Sandy Creek as part of Brazos’ bankruptcy proceedings. A Chapter 7 Trustee has been appointed, and the Chapter 7 Trustee was approved by the bankruptcy court to operate Brazos Sandy Creek as a going concern. CFC had a secured loan outstanding to Brazos Sandy Creek totaling $28 million as of May 31, 2022, which, upon notification of the bankruptcy filing by Brazos Sandy Creek, we classified as nonperforming during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2022. Brazos Sandy Creek’s loan outstanding of $28 million was delinquent as of May 31, 2022 and on nonaccrual status as of this date. Aggregate loans outstanding to Brazos and Brazos Sandy Creek totaled $114 million as of May 31, 2022, of which $49 million were secured and $65 million were unsecured. Prior to Brazos’ and Brazos Sandy Creek’s bankruptcy filings in March 2021 and March 2022, respectively, we had not experienced any defaults or charge-offs in our electric utility and telecommunications loan portfolios since fiscal years 2013 and 2017, respectively.

Our allowance for credit losses and allowance coverage ratio decreased to $68 million and 0.22%, respectively, as of May 31, 2022, from $86 million and 0.30%, respectively, as of May 31, 2021. The decrease in the allowance for credit losses of $18 million reflected a decrease in the collective and asset-specific allowance of $14 million and $4 million, respectively. The collective allowance decrease of $14 million was attributable to an improvement in Rayburn’s credit risk profile following Rayburn’s successful completion of a securitization transaction in February 2022 and subsequent payment in full of its obligations to ERCOT and a significant reduction in loans outstanding to Rayburn, as discussed above. The asset-specific allowance decrease of $4 million stemmed from the combined impact of the elimination of an asset-specific allowance attributable to nonperforming loans totaling $9 million that were paid in full during the second quarter of fiscal year 2022 and the decrease of an asset-specific allowance for a nonperforming CFC power supply borrower, attributable to loan payments received on this loan, partially offset by the addition of an asset-specific allowance for Brazos Sandy Creek due to its bankruptcy filing, as discussed above.

As a result of Rayburn’s payment in full of its February 2021 polar vortex-related outstanding obligations to ERCOT, we believe our exposure to the significant adverse financial impact on some electric utilities from the surge in wholesale power costs in Texas during the February 2021 polar vortex is now limited to loans outstanding to Brazos and its wholly-owned subsidiary Brazos Sandy Creek.

We discuss our methodology for estimating the allowance for credit losses in “Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” of this Report. We also provide additional information on the credit quality of our loan portfolio and the allowance for credit losses below in the sections “Critical Accounting Estimates” and “Credit Risk—Allowance for Credit Losses” and “Note 4—Loans” and “Note 5—Allowance for Credit Losses” of this Report.

Financing Activity

We issue debt primarily to fund growth in our loan portfolio. As such, our debt outstanding generally increases and decreases in response to member loan demand. Total debt outstanding increased $1,321 million, or 5%, to $28,747 million as of May 31, 2022, due to borrowings to fund the increase in loans to members. Outstanding dealer commercial paper of $1,025 million as of May 31, 2022 was within our quarter-end target range. Our goal is to maintain dealer commercial paper balance at each quarter-end within a range of $1,000 million and $1,500 million. We provide additional information on our financing activities during fiscal year 2022 in the below in section “Consolidated Balance Sheet Analysis—Debt” of this Report.


31


On December 13, 2021, S&P affirmed CFC’s credit ratings and stable outlook under its revised criteria and updated methodology for rating financial institutions published on December 9, 2021. On December 16, 2021, Moody’s affirmed CFC’s credit ratings and stable outlook. On February 4, 2022, Fitch issued a credit ratings report review of CFC in which Fitch affirmed CFC’s credit ratings and stable outlook. Table 31 presents our credit ratings for each CFC debt product type as of May 31, 2022, which remain unchanged as of the date of this Report, in the below section “Liquidity Risk—Credit Ratings” of this Report.

Liquidity

Our primary sources of funds include member loan principal repayments, securities held in our investment portfolio, committed bank revolving lines of credit, committed loan facilities under the Guaranteed Underwriter Program, revolving note purchase agreements with Farmer Mac and proceeds from debt issuances to our members and in the public capital markets. Although as a non-bank financial institution we are not subject to regulatory liquidity requirements, we monitor our liquidity and funding positions on an ongoing basis and assess our ability to meet our scheduled debt obligations and other cash flow requirements based on point-in-time metrics as well as forward-looking projections. Our liquidity and funding assessment takes into consideration amounts available under existing liquidity sources, the expected rollover of member short-term investments and scheduled loan principal repayment amounts, as well as our continued ability to access the private placement and public capital markets.

As of May 31, 2022, our available liquidity totaled $6,797 million, consisting of (i) cash and cash equivalents of $154 million; (ii) investments in debt securities with an aggregate fair value of $566 million, which is subject to changes based on market fluctuations; (iii) up to $2,597 million available under committed bank revolving line of credit agreements; (iv) up to $1,075 million available under committed loan facilities under the Guaranteed Underwriter Program; and (v) up to $2,405 million available under a revolving note purchase agreement with Farmer Mac, subject to market conditions. In addition to our existing available liquidity of $6,797 million as of May 31, 2022, we expect to receive $1,479 million from scheduled long-term loan principal payments over the next 12 months.

Debt scheduled to mature over the next 12 months totaled $6,894 million as of May 31, 2022, consisting of short-term borrowings of $4,981 million and long-term and subordinated debt of $1,913 million. The short-term borrowings scheduled maturity amount of $4,981 million consists of member investments of $3,956 million and dealer commercial paper of $1,025 million. The long-term and subordinated scheduled debt obligations over the next 12 months of $1,913 million consist of debt maturities and scheduled debt payment amounts.

Our available liquidity of $6,797 million as of May 31, 2022, was $97 million below our total scheduled debt obligations over the next 12 months of $6,894 million. We believe we can continue to roll over our member short-term investments of $3,956 million as of May 31, 2022, based on our expectation that our members will continue to reinvest their excess cash in short-term investment products offered by CFC. Our members historically have maintained a relatively stable level of short-term investments in CFC in the form of commercial paper, select notes, daily liquidity fund notes and medium-term notes. Member short-term investments in CFC have averaged $3,584 million over the last 12 fiscal quarter-end reporting periods. In addition, we expect to receive $1,479 million from scheduled long-term loan principal payments over the next 12 months. Our available liquidity of $6,797 million as of May 31, 2022 was $3,859 million in excess of, or 2.3 times, our total scheduled debt obligations, excluding member short-term investments, over the next 12 months of $2,938 million.

We expect to continue accessing the dealer commercial paper market as a cost-effective means of satisfying our incremental short-term liquidity needs. Although the intra-period amount of dealer commercial paper outstanding may exist whenfluctuate based on our liquidity requirements, our intent is to manage our short-term wholesale funding risk by maintaining dealer commercial paper outstanding at each quarter-end within a range of $1,000 million and $1,500 million. Maintaining our committed bank revolving line of credit agreements and continuing to be in compliance with the covenants of these agreements serve to mitigate our rollover risk, as we can draw on these facilities, if necessary, to repay dealer or member commercial paper that cannot be refinanced with similar debt. In addition, under master repurchase agreements we have with counterparties, we can obtain short-term funding in secured borrowing transactions by selling investment-grade corporate debt securities from our investment securities portfolio subject to an obligation to repurchase the same or similar securities at an agreed-upon price and date.



32


The issuance of long-term debt, which represents the most significant component of our funding, allows us to reduce our reliance on short-term borrowings, as well as effectively manage our refinancing and interest rate risk. We expect to continue to issue debt in the private placement and public capital markets to meet our funding needs and believe that we have sufficient sources of liquidity to meet our debt obligations and support our operations over the next 12 months.

We provide additional information on our liquidity profile and our primary sources and uses of funds, including projected amounts, by quarter, over each of the next six fiscal quarters through the quarter ending November 30, 2023, in the below section “Liquidity Risk” of this Report.

COVID-19

We believe that the COVID-19 pandemic has not adversely affected our primary objective of providing our members with the credit products they need to fund their operations and that we have been able to successfully navigate the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic to date. Our electric utility cooperative borrowers operate in a sector identified by the U.S. government as one of the 16 critical infrastructure sectors because the nature of the services provided in these sectors is considered essential and vital in supporting and maintaining the overall functioning of the U.S. economy. Historically, the utility sector in which our electric utility borrowers operate has been resilient to economic downturns. To date, we believe that the pandemic has not had a significant negative impact on the overall financial performance of our members. We also believe that the overall credit quality of our loan portfolio has not been adversely affected by market, economic and other disruptions caused by the pandemic, as we have not experienced any delinquencies in scheduled loan payments or received requests for payment deferrals from our borrowers due to the pandemic.

CFC has been able to maintain business continuity throughout the pandemic and has experienced no pandemic-related employee furloughs or layoffs. We have remote-work options available for most employees while also providing for in- person collaboration at our headquarters in Loudoun County, Virginia, as we believe this working model allows CFC to provide the highest quality of service and deliver more effectively on our member-focused mission. Effective March 2, 2022, we lifted our mask requirement at CFC’s headquarters for vaccinated employees based on the CDC’s updated guidance and the COVID-19 Community Level low classification for Loudoun County at that time. We plan to continue to monitor and update our practices in response to changes in the COVID-19 workplace safety and health standards established by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”) and Virginia as they relate to Loudoun County and guidance provided by the CDC.

Although most health and safety restrictions in response to COVID-19 have been lifted, we cannot predict the potential future impact that the COVID-19 pandemic may have on our operations and financial performance, or the specific ways the pandemic may uniquely impact our members. We provide additional information on actions taken in response to the pandemic to protect the safety and health of our employees under “Item 1. Business—Human Capital Management” in this Report. We discuss the potential adverse impact of natural disasters, including weather-related events such as the February 2021 polar vortex, and widespread health emergencies, such as COVID-19, on our business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity under “Item 1A. Risk Factors—Operations and Business Risks” in this Report.

Electric Cooperative Industry Trends and Developments

We believe there are emerging developments and trends in the electric cooperative sector that may present opportunities as well as challenges for our electric cooperative members. These trends include (i) expanded investments by some electric cooperatives to deploy broadband services to their members; (ii) inflation and supply chain disruptions; (iii) an increased focus on enhancing electric system resiliency and reliability; (iv) evolving relationships between some electric cooperative power supply systems and electric cooperative distribution systems to increase investments in renewable power supply; and (v) growing support of beneficial electrification strategies to reduce overall carbon emissions, while also providing benefits to cooperative members.

Expanded Investments to Deploy Broadband Services

Many rural electric distribution cooperatives have made or are making infrastructure investments that include building fiber optic lines to improve electric grid system reliability, efficiency and cost savings, as fiber operations offers enhanced communication to monitor electric systems, identify outages and speed electric restoration. Some of these electric


33


cooperatives are leveraging these fiber assets to offer access to broadband services, either directly or by partnering with local telecommunication companies and others, to the communities they serve. We are currently aware of 185 broadband projects by different CFC member cooperatives, and we financed or are financing 112 of these 185 broadband projects. Capital expenditures for the completion of these 185 broadband projects are expected to total approximately $9,632 million. We believe that the capital expenditures for the completion of the broadband projects that we financed or are financing will total approximately $3,985 million. Our aggregate loans outstanding to CFC electric distribution cooperative members relating to broadband projects, which we started tracking in October 2017, increased to an estimated $1,647 million as of May 31, 2022, from approximately $854 million as of May 31, 2021. The three states with the largest CFC loans outstanding for broadband projects were Oklahoma, Indiana and Arkansas as of May 31, 2022, and broadband loans outstanding for these states totaled $205 million, $191 million and $155 million, respectively, as of this date. Many of these broadband projects are also financially supported by various states and the federal government, which reduces the credit risk for CFC and the investment risk for our electric cooperative members. We expect our member electric cooperatives to continue in their efforts to expand broadband access to unserved and underserved communities.

Inflation and Supply Chain Disruptions

Many rural electric cooperatives are experiencing increasing cost in power supply, labor and materials. Power supply cost for many cooperatives is increasingly volatile based on natural gas and coal market pricing. For example, according to the Economic News Release from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics published on July 13, 2022, the index for natural gas increased 38.4% over the last 12 months, the largest increase since the period ending October 2005. In addition to increasing material cost, supply chain disruptions have extended delivery times for utility hardware and are causing project timelines to be extended as well. Labor cost and competition for employees has increased for some cooperatives due to labor shortages.

Increased Focus on Enhancing Electric System Resiliency and Reliability

We have observed an increase in capital investments by electric cooperatives to proactively strengthen existing electric systems as well as replace systems in the aftermath of damages from recent weather-related incidents, including hurricanes and winter storms. We believe that the adverse impact on electric systems from weather-related incidents and wildfires has resulted in a heightened awareness by electric cooperatives of the need to focus attention on making infrastructure upgrades to improve both the resiliency and reliability of electric systems.

Evolving Cooperative Focus on Clean Energy Supply Investments

We also have observed that many electric power supply and electric distribution cooperatives are increasingly focused on efforts to identify potential opportunities to increase investments in renewable power supply and storage. This includes both on-balance sheet construction of renewable generation and off-balance sheet acquisition of renewable power through power purchase agreements. According to the NRECA, electric cooperatives more than tripled their renewable capacity from 3.9 gigawatts to more than 13 gigawatts from 2010 to 2021, including adding 1.4 gigawatts of renewable capacity in 2021 alone.

Growing Support for Beneficial Electrification

Rural electric cooperatives have become increasingly supportive of beneficial electrification, which refers to the replacement of fossil-fuel powered systems with electrical ones in a way that reduces overall emissions, while providing benefits to the environment and to households. The increased support among electric cooperatives reflects an expectation that beneficial electrification will result in increased sales, while also saving money for members and reducing carbon emission.

We believe the above trends and current investment priorities of our electric cooperative members will require reliable, affordable sources of funding and may result in a steady demand for capital from CFC.

Outlook

As further described below in the “Liquidity Risk—Projected Near-Term Sources and Uses of Funds” section, we currently anticipate net long-term loan growth of $1,150 million over the next 12 months. On March 16, 2022, the Federal Open


34


Market Committee (“FOMC”) of the Federal Reserve raised the target range for the federal funds rate by 0.25% to a range of 0.25% to 0.50%, the first rate increase since December 2018. The FOMC further raised the target range for the federal funds rate at each of its meetings held in May, June and July 2022, with the federal funds rate reaching a target range of 2.25% to 2.50%. The FOMC also signaled an expectation of ongoing increases in the federal funds rate at each of its remaining three meetings in 2022, and pointed to a consensus target rate of 3.40% by December 31, 2022, an increase from its March 2022 estimated target rate of 1.90%, due to an increase in inflation projections. The yield curve has flattened throughout 2022, was briefly inverted in late March 2022 and again in June and July 2022. The consensus market outlook for interest rates as of the second half of June 2022 pointed to rising interest rates across the yield curve, with the yield curve remaining flat or inverted over the remainder of 2022. Based on this yield curve forecast, we anticipate a decrease in our reported net interest income, reported net interest yield and adjusted net interest yield over the next 12 months relative to the prior 12-month period ended May 31, 2022. However, we expect a slight increase in our adjusted net interest income over the next 12 months relative to the prior 12-month period ended May 31, 2022, due to an anticipated reduction in our derivative net periodic cash settlements expense as short-term interest rates rise.

We anticipate a slight decrease in our adjusted net income and adjusted TIER over the next 12 months. While our goal is to maintain an adjusted debt-to-equity ratio of approximately 6.00-to-1, we expect that our adjusted debt-to-equity ratio will remain near the current level due to the anticipated loan growth. As discussed above, we are subject to earnings volatility, often significant, because we do not apply hedge accounting to our interest rate swaps. Therefore, the periodic unrealized fluctuations in the fair value of our interest rate swaps are recorded in our earnings. The variances in our earnings between periods are generally attributable to significant shifts in recorded unrealized derivative forward value gain and loss amounts. We exclude the impact of unrealized derivative forward fair value gains and losses from our non-GAAP adjusted measures.

We are unable to provide a reconciliation of our projected adjusted net income, adjusted TIER and adjusted debt-to-equity ratio to the most directly comparable GAAP measures or directional guidance for the most directly comparable GAAP measures on a forward-looking basis without unreasonable effort due to the significant shifts in the unrealized derivative forward value gains and losses recorded each period. The majority of our swaps are long-term, with an average remaining life of approximately 15 years as of May 31, 2022. We can reasonably estimate the realized net periodic derivative cash settlement amounts loanedover the next 12 months for our interest rate swaps, which are typically based on the 3-month LIBOR and the fixed rate of the swap. In contrast, the unrealized periodic derivative forward value gains and losses are largely based on future expected changes in longer-term interest rates, which we are unable to accurately predict for each reporting period over the next 12 months. Because unrealized periodic derivative forward value gain and loss amounts are a key driver of changes in our earnings between periods, this unavailable information is likely to have a significant impact on our reported net income, TIER and debt-to-equity ratio, which represent the most directly comparable GAAP measures. We provide reconciliations of our non-GAAP adjusted net income, adjusted TIER and adjusted debt-to-equity ratio to the most directly comparable GAAP measures for each reporting period included in this Report in the section “Non-GAAP Financial Measures.” These reconciliations illustrate the potential significant impact that unrealized derivative forward value gains and losses could have on our future reported net income, reported TIER and reported adjusted debt-to-equity ratio.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make a number of judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets, liabilities, income and expenses in our consolidated financial statements. Understanding our accounting policies and the extent to which we use management’s judgment and estimates in applying these policies is integral to understanding our financial statements. We provide a discussion of our significant accounting policies in “Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.”

Certain accounting estimates are considered critical because they involve significant judgments and assumptions about highly complex and inherently uncertain matters, and the use of reasonably different estimates and assumptions could have a material impact on our results of operations or financial condition. The determination of the allowance for expected credit losses over the remaining expected life of the loans in our loan portfolio involves a significant degree of management judgment and level of estimation uncertainty. As such, we have identified our accounting policy governing the estimation of the allowance for credit losses as a critical accounting estimate. Management established policies and control procedures intended to ensure that the methodology used for determining our allowance for credit losses, including any judgments and assumptions made as part of such method, are well-controlled and applied consistently from period to period. We evaluate


35


our critical accounting estimates and judgments required by our policies on an ongoing basis and update them as necessary based on changing conditions. We describe our allowance methodology and process for estimating the allowance for credit losses under “Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies—Allowance for Credit Losses—Loan Portfolio—Current Methodology.”

Upon our adoption of CECL on June 1, 2020, we are required to maintain an allowance based on a current estimate of credit losses that are expected to occur over the remaining life of the loans in our portfolio. The methods utilized to estimate the allowance for credit losses, key assumptions and quantitative and qualitative information considered by management in determining the appropriate allowance for credit losses is discussed in “Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.”

Key inputs, such as our historical loss data and third-party default data, that we use in determining the appropriate allowance for credit losses are more readily quantifiable, while other inputs, such as our internally assigned borrower risk ratings that are intended to assess a borrower’s capacity to meet its financial obligations and provide information on the probability of default, require more qualitative judgment. Degrees of imprecision exist in each of these inputs due in part to subjective judgments involved and an inherent lag in the data available to quantify current conditions and events that may affect our credit loss estimate.

Our internally assigned borrower risk ratings serve as the primary credit quality indicator for our loan portfolio. We perform an annual comprehensive review of each of our borrowers, following the receipt of the borrower’s annual audited financial statements, to reassess the borrower’s risk rating. In addition, interim risk-rating adjustments may occur as a result of updated information affecting a borrower’s ability to fulfill its obligations or other significant developments and trends. Our Credit Risk Management Group and Corporate Credit Committee review and provide rigorous oversight and governance around our internally assigned risk ratings to ensure the ratings process is consistent. In addition, we engage third-party credit risk management experts to conduct an independent annual review of our risk rating system to validate its overall integrity. This review involves an evaluation of the accuracy and timeliness of individual risk ratings and the overall effectiveness of our risk-rating framework relative to the risk profile of our credit exposures. While we have a robust risk-rating process, changes in our borrower risk ratings may not always directly coincide with changes in the risk profile of an individual borrower due to the timing of the rating process and a potential lag in the receipt of information necessary to evaluate the impact of emerging developments and current conditions on the risk ratings of our borrower. Although our allowance for credit losses is sensitive to each key input, shifts in the credit risk ratings of our borrowers generally have the most notable impact on our allowance for credit losses.

Allowance for Credit Losses

Our allowance for credit losses and allowance coverage ratio decreased to $68 million and 0.22%, respectively, as of May 31, 2022, from $86 million and 0.30%, respectively, as of May 31, 2021. The decrease in the allowance for credit losses of $18 million reflected a decrease in the collective and asset-specific allowance of $14 million and $4 million, respectively. We discuss the methodology used to estimate the allowance for credit losses in “Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.”

Key Assumptions

Determining the appropriateness of the allowance for credit losses is subject to numerous estimates and assumptions requiring significant management judgment about matters that involve a high degree of subjectivity and are difficult to predict. The key assumptions in determining our collective allowance that require significant management judgment and may have a material impact on the amount of the allowance include the segmentation of our loan portfolio; our internally assigned borrower risk ratings; the probability of default; the loss severity or recovery rate in the event of default for each portfolio segment; and management’s consideration of qualitative factors that may cause estimated credit losses associated with our existing loan portfolio to differ from our historical loss experience.

As discussed below in “Credit Risk—Loan Portfolio Credit Risk,” CFC has experienced only 18 defaults in its 53-year history, and prior to Brazos and Brazos Sandy Creek we had no defaults in our electric utility loan portfolio since fiscal year 2013. As such, we have a limited history of defaults to develop reasonable and supportable estimated probability of default rates for our existing loan portfolio. We therefore utilize third-party default data for the utility sector as a proxy to estimate


36


probability of default rates for our loan portfolio segments. However, we utilize our internal historical loss experience to estimate loss given default, or the recovery rate, for each of our loan portfolio segments. We believe our internal historical loss experience serves as a more reliable estimate of loss severity than third-party data due to the organizational structure and operating environment of rural utility cooperatives, our lending practice of generally requiring a senior security position on the assets and revenue of borrowers for long-term loans, the approach we take in working with borrowers that may be experiencing operational or financial issues and other factors discussed in “Credit Risk—Loan Portfolio Credit Risk.”

We generally consider nonperforming loans as well as loans that have been or are anticipated to be modified under a troubled debt restructuring for individual evaluation given the risk characteristics of such loans and establish an asset-specific allowance for these loans. The key assumptions in determining our asset-specific allowance that require significant management judgment and may have a material impact on the amount of the allowance include measuring the amount and timing of future cash flows for individually evaluated loans that are not collateral-dependent and estimating the value of the underlying collateral for individually evaluated loans that are collateral-dependent.

The degree to which any particular assumption affects the allowance for credit losses depends on the severity of the change and its relationship to the other assumptions. We regularly evaluate the key inputs and assumptions used in determining the allowance for credit losses and update them, as necessary, to better reflect present conditions, including current trends in credit performance and borrower risk profile, portfolio concentration risk, changes in risk-management practices, changes in the regulatory environment and other factors relevant to our loan portfolio segments. We did not change our allowance methodology or nature of the underlying key inputs used and assumptions used in measuring our allowance for credit losses during fiscal year 2022.

Sensitivity Analysis

As noted above, our allowance for credit losses is sensitive to a variety of factors. While management uses its best judgment to assess loss data and other factors to determine the allowance for credit losses, changes in our loss assumptions, adjustments to assigned borrower risk ratings, the use of alternate external data sources or other factors could affect our estimate of probable credit losses inherent in the portfolio as of each balance sheet date, which would also impact the related provision for credit losses recognized in our consolidated statements of operations. For example, changes in the inputs below, without taking into consideration the impact of other potential offsetting or correlated inputs, would have the following effect on our allowance of credit losses as of May 31, 2022.

A 10% increase or decrease in the default rates for all of our portfolio segments would result in a corresponding increase or decrease of approximately $3 million.
A 1% increase or decrease in the recovery rates for all of our portfolio segments would result in a corresponding decrease or increase of approximately $9 million.
A one-notch downgrade in the internal borrower risk ratings for our entire loan portfolio would result in an increase of approximately $13 million, while a one-notch upgrade would result in a decrease of approximately $14 million.

These sensitivity analyses are intended to provide an indication of the isolated impact of hypothetical alternative assumptions on our allowance for credit losses. Because management evaluates a variety of factors and inputs in determining the allowance for credit losses, these sensitivity analyses are not considered probable and do not imply an expectation of future changes in loss rates or borrower risk ratings. Given current processes employed in estimating the allowance for credit losses, management believes the inherent loss rates and currently assigned risk ratings are appropriate. It is possible that others performing the analyses, given the same information, may at any point in time reach different reasonable conclusions that could be significant to our consolidated financial statements.

We discuss the risks and uncertainties related to management’s judgments and estimates in applying accounting policies that have been identified as a critical accounting estimates under “Item 1A. Risk Factors—Regulatory and Compliance Risks” in this Report. We provide additional information on the allowance for credit losses under the below section “Credit Risk—Allowance for Credit Losses” and “Note 5—Allowance for Credit Losses” in this Report.



37


RECENT ACCOUNTING CHANGES AND OTHER DEVELOPMENTS

Recent Accounting Changes

We provide information on recently adopted accounting standards and the adoption impact on CFC’s consolidated financial statements and recently issued accounting standards not yet required to be adopted and the expected adoption impact in “Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.” To the extent we believe the adoption of new accounting standards has had or will have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations, financial condition or liquidity, we discuss the impact in the applicable section(s) of this MD&A.

CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This section provides a comparative discussion of our consolidated results of operations between fiscal years 2022 and 2021. Following this section, we provide a discussion and analysis of material changes in amounts reported on our consolidated balance sheet as of May 31, 2022 and amounts reported as of May 31, 2021. You should read these sections together with our “Executive Summary—Outlook” where we discuss trends and other factors that we expect will affect our future results of operations. See “Item 7. MD&A—Consolidated Results of Operations” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021 (“2021 Form 10-K”) for a comparative discussion of our consolidated results of operations between fiscal year 2021 and the fiscal year ended May 31, 2020 (“fiscal year 2020”).

Net Interest Income

Net interest income, which is our largest source of revenue, represents the difference between the interest income earned on our interest-earning assets and the interest expense on our interest-bearing liabilities. Our net interest yield represents the difference between the yield on our interest-earning assets and the cost of our interest-bearing liabilities plus the impact of non-interest bearing funding. We expect net interest income and our net interest yield to fluctuate based on changes in interest rates and changes in the amount and composition of our interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. We do not fund each individual loan with specific debt. Rather, we attempt to minimize costs and maximize efficiency by proportionately funding large aggregated amounts of loans.

Table 2 presents average balances for fiscal years 2022, 2021 and 2020, and for each major category of our interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, the interest income earned or interest expense incurred, and the average yield or cost. Table 2 also presents non-GAAP adjusted interest expense, adjusted net interest income and adjusted net interest yield, which reflect the inclusion of net accrued periodic derivative cash settlements expense in interest expense. We provide reconciliations of our non-GAAP adjusted measures to the most comparable U.S. GAAP measures under “Non-GAAP Financial Measures.”



38


Table 2: Average Balances, Interest Income/Interest Expense and Average Yield/Cost
Year Ended May 31,
(Dollars in thousands)202220212020
Assets:Average BalanceInterest Income/ExpenseAverage Yield/CostAverage BalanceInterest Income/ExpenseAverage Yield/CostAverage BalanceInterest Income/ExpenseAverage Yield/Cost
Long-term fixed-rate loans(1)
$25,974,724 $1,062,223 4.09 %$24,978,267 $1,051,524 4.21 %$23,890,577 $1,043,918 4.37 %
Long-term variable-rate loans749,131 16,895 2.26 645,819 14,976 2.32 891,541 31,293 3.51 
Line of credit loans2,148,197 46,887 2.18 1,626,092 35,596 2.19 1,718,364 55,140 3.21 
Troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”) loans9,528 735 7.71 10,328 790 7.65 11,238 836 7.44 
Nonperforming loans227,795   185,554 — — 5,957 — — 
Other, net(2)
 (1,448) — (1,381)— — (1,304)— 
Total loans29,109,375 1,125,292 3.87 27,446,060 1,101,505 4.01 26,517,677 1,129,883 4.26 
Cash, time deposits and investment securities762,489 15,951 2.09 796,566 15,096 1.90 866,013 21,403 2.47 
Total interest-earning assets$29,871,864 $1,141,243 3.82 %$28,242,626 $1,116,601 3.95 %$27,383,690 $1,151,286 4.20 %
Other assets, less allowance for credit losses(3)
466,329 537,506 551,378 
Total assets(3)
$30,338,193 $28,780,132 $27,935,068 
Liabilities:
Commercial paper$2,565,629 $11,086 0.43 %$2,189,558 $8,330 0.38 %$2,318,112 $45,713 1.97 %
Other short-term borrowings2,006,020 7,179 0.36 2,148,767 6,400 0.30 1,795,351 32,282 1.80 
Short-term borrowings(4)
4,571,649 18,265 0.40 4,338,325 14,730 0.34 4,113,463 77,995 1.90 
Medium-term notes4,854,421 108,769 2.24 3,904,603 113,582 2.91 3,551,973 125,954 3.55 
Collateral trust bonds7,050,468 248,413 3.52 6,938,534 249,248 3.59 7,185,910 257,396 3.58 
Guaranteed Underwriter Program notes payable6,165,206 169,166 2.74 6,146,410 167,403 2.72 5,581,854 162,929 2.92 
Farmer Mac notes payable3,059,946 55,245 1.81 2,844,252 50,818 1.79 2,986,469 87,617 2.93 
Other notes payable6,774 155 2.29 10,246 241 2.35 17,586 671 3.82 
Subordinated deferrable debt986,407 51,541 5.23 986,209 51,551 5.23 986,035 51,527 5.23 
Subordinated certificates1,245,120 53,980 4.34 1,270,385 54,490 4.29 1,349,454 57,000 4.22 
Total interest-bearing liabilities$27,939,991 $705,534 2.53 %$26,438,964 $702,063 2.66 %$25,772,744 $821,089 3.19 %
Other liabilities(3)
897,751 1,380,414 1,141,884 
Total liabilities(3)
28,837,742 27,819,378 26,914,628 
Total equity(3)
1,500,451 960,754 1,020,440 
Total liabilities and equity(3)
$30,338,193 $28,780,132 $27,935,068 
Net interest spread(5)
1.29 %1.29 %1.01 %
Impact of non-interest bearing funding(6)
0.17 0.18 0.20 
Net interest income/net interest yield(7)
$435,709 1.46 %$414,538 1.47 %$330,197 1.21 %
Adjusted net interest income/adjusted net interest yield:
Interest income$1,141,243 3.82 %$1,116,601 3.95 %$1,151,286 4.20 %
Interest expense705,534 2.53 702,063 2.66 821,089 3.19 
Add: Net periodic derivative cash settlements interest expense(8)
101,385 1.21 115,645 1.28 55,873 0.55 
Adjusted interest expense/adjusted average cost(9)
$806,919 2.89 %$817,708 3.09 %$876,962 3.40 %
Adjusted net interest spread(7)
0.93 %0.86 %0.80 %
Impact of non-interest bearing funding(6)
0.19 0.20 0.20 
Adjusted net interest income/adjusted net interest yield(10)
$334,324 1.12 %$298,893 1.06 %$274,324 1.00 %



39


____________________________
(1)Interest income on long-term, fixed-rate loans includes loan conversion fees, which are generally deferred and recognized as interest income using the effective interest method.
(2)Consists of late payment fees and net amortization of deferred loan fees and loan origination costs.
(3)The average balance represents average monthly balances, which is calculated based on the month-end balance as of the beginning of the reporting period and the balances as of the end of each month included in the specified reporting period.
(4)Short-term borrowings reported on our consolidated balance sheets consist of borrowings with an original contractual maturity of one year or less. However, short-term borrowings presented in Table 2 consist of commercial paper, select notes, daily liquidity fund notes and secured borrowings under repurchase agreements. Short-term borrowings presented on our consolidated balance sheets related to medium-term notes, Farmer Mac notes payable and other notes payable are reported in the respective category for presentation purposes in Table 2. The period-end amounts reported as short-term borrowings on our consolidated balances sheets, which are excluded from the calculation of average short-term borrowings presented in Table 2, totaled $417 million, $363 million, and $537 million as of May 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
(5)Net interest spread represents the difference between the average yield on total average interest-earning assets and the average cost of total average interest-bearing liabilities. Adjusted net interest spread represents the difference between the average yield on total average interest-earning assets and the adjusted average cost of total average interest-bearing liabilities.
(6)Includes other liabilities and equity.
(7)Net interest yield is calculated based on net interest income for the period divided by total average interest-earning assets for the period.
(8)Represents the impact of net periodic contractual interest amounts on our interest rate swaps during the period. This amount is added to interest expense to derive non-GAAP adjusted interest expense. The average (benefit)/cost associated with derivatives is calculated based on net periodic swap settlement interest amount during the period divided by the average outstanding notional amount of derivatives during the period. The average outstanding notional amount of interest rate swaps was $8,406 million, $9,062 million and $10,180 million for fiscal years 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
(9)Adjusted interest expense consists of interest expense plus net periodic derivative cash settlements interest expense during the period. Net periodic derivative cash settlement interest amounts are reported on our consolidated statements of operations as a component of derivative gains (losses). Adjusted average cost is calculated based on adjusted interest expense for the period divided by total average interest-bearing liabilities during the period.
(10)Adjusted net interest yield is calculated based on adjusted net interest income for the period divided by total average interest-earning assets for the period.

Table 3 displays the change in net interest income between periods and the extent to which the variance for each category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities is attributable to (i) changes in volume, which represents the change in the average balances of our interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities or volume, and (ii) changes in the rate, which represents the change in the average interest rates of these assets and liabilities. The table also presents the change in adjusted net interest income between periods.


40


Table 3: Rate/Volume Analysis of Changes in Interest Income/Interest Expense
 2022 versus 20212021 versus 2020
 Total
Variance Due To:(1)
Total
Variance Due To:(1)
(Dollars in thousands)VarianceVolumeRateVarianceVolumeRate
Interest income:      
Long-term fixed-rate loans$10,699 $41,948 $(31,249)$7,606 $47,527 $(39,921)
Long-term variable-rate loans1,919 2,396 (477)(16,317)(8,625)(7,692)
Line of credit loans11,291 11,429 (138)(19,544)(2,961)(16,583)
TDR loans(55)(61)6 (46)(68)22 
Other, net(67) (67)(77)— (77)
Total loans23,787 55,712 (31,925)(28,378)35,873 (64,251)
Cash, time deposits and investment securities855 (646)1,501 (6,307)(1,716)(4,591)
Total interest income$24,642 $55,066 $(30,424)$(34,685)$34,157 $(68,842)
Interest expense:    
Commercial paper$2,756 $1,431 $1,325 $(37,383)$(2,535)$(34,848)
Other short-term borrowings779 (425)1,204 (25,882)6,355 (32,237)
Short-term borrowings3,535 1,006 2,529 (63,265)3,820 (67,085)
Medium-term notes(4,813)27,629 (32,442)(12,372)12,504 (24,876)
Collateral trust bonds(835)4,021 (4,856)(8,148)(8,861)713 
Guaranteed Underwriter Program notes payable1,763 512 1,251 4,474 16,479 (12,005)
Farmer Mac notes payable4,427 3,854 573 (36,799)(4,172)(32,627)
Other notes payable(86)(82)(4)(430)(280)(150)
Subordinated deferrable debt(10)10 (20)24 15 
Subordinated certificates(510)(1,084)574 (2,510)(3,340)830 
Total interest expense3,471 35,866 (32,395)(119,026)16,159 (135,185)
Net interest income$21,171 $19,200 $1,971 $84,341 $17,998 $66,343 
Adjusted net interest income:
Interest income$24,642 $55,066 $(30,424)$(34,685)$34,157 $(68,842)
Interest expense3,471 35,866 (32,395)(119,026)16,159 (135,185)
Net periodic derivative cash settlements interest expense(2)
(14,260)(8,367)(5,893)59,772 (6,137)65,909 
Adjusted interest expense(3)
(10,789)27,499 (38,288)(59,254)10,022 (69,276)
Adjusted net interest income$35,431 $27,567 $7,864 $24,569 $24,135 $434 
____________________________
(1)The changes for each category of interest income and interest expense represent changes in either average balances (volume) or average rates for both interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. We allocate the amount attributable to the combined impact of volume and rate to the rate variance.
(2)For the net periodic derivative cash settlements interest amount, the variance due to average volume represents the change in the net periodic derivative cash settlements interest expense amount resulting from the change in the average notional amount of derivative contracts outstanding. The variance due to average rate represents the change in the net periodic derivative cash settlements amount resulting from the net difference between the average rate paid and the average rate received for interest rate swaps during the period.
(3) See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” for additional information on our adjusted non-GAAP measures.





41


Reported Net Interest Income

Reported net interest income of $436 million for fiscal year 2022 increased $21 million, or 5%, from fiscal year 2021, driven by an increase in average interest-earning assets of $1,629 million, or 6%, partially offset by a decrease in the net interest yield of 1% (1 basis point) to 1.46%.

Average Interest-Earning Assets: The increase in average interest-earning assets of 6% during fiscal year 2022 was primarily attributable to growth in average total loans of $1,663 million, or 6%, from fiscal year 2021, driven by an increase in average long-term fixed-rate loans of $996 million and an increase in average line of credit loans of $522 million. The continued low interest rate environment presented an opportunity for members to obtain long-term loan advances to fund capital investments at a low fixed rate of interest. The increase in average line of credit loans was mainly attributable to loan advances to one distribution member that experienced an adverse financial impact from restoration costs incurred to repair damage caused by two successive hurricanes and loan advances to several CFC Texas-based power supply borrowers that were subject to elevated power costs during the February 2021 polar vortex.

Net Interest Yield: The increase in the net interest yield of 1 basis point, or 1%, was primarily attributable to the combined impact of a decrease in the average yield on interest-earning assets of 13 basis points to 3.82% and a reduction in the benefit from non-interest bearing funding of 1 basis point to 0.17%, which were largely offset by a reduction in our average cost of borrowings of 13 basis points to 2.53%. The decreases in the average yield on interest-earning assets and our average cost of borrowings reflected the impact of the continued low interest rate environment during fiscal year 2022.

Adjusted Net Interest Income

Adjusted net interest income of $334 million for fiscal year 2022 increased $35 million, or 12%, from fiscal year 2021, driven by the combined impact of an increase in average interest-earning assets of $1,629 million, or 6%, and an increase in the adjusted net interest yield of 6 basis points, or 6%, to 1.12%.

Average Interest-Earning Assets: The increase in average interest-earning assets of 6% was driven by the growth in average total loans of $1,663 million, or 6%, from fiscal year 2021, primarily attributable to an increase in average long-term fixed-rate and line of credit loans as discussed above.

Adjusted Net Interest Yield: The increase in the adjusted net interest yield of 6 basis points, or 6%, reflected the favorable impact of a reduction in our adjusted average cost of borrowings of 20 basis points to 2.89%, which was partially offset by a decrease in the average yield on interest-earning assets of 13 basis points to 3.82%, both of which were attributable to the lower interest rate environment during fiscal year 2022.

We include the net periodic derivative cash settlements interest expense amounts on our interest rate swaps in the calculation of our adjusted average cost of borrowings, which, as a result, also impacts the calculation of adjusted net interest income and adjusted net interest yield. We recorded net periodic derivative cash settlements interest expense of $101 million for fiscal year 2022, compared with $116 million and $56 million for fiscal years 2021 and 2020.

The floating-rate payments on our interest rate swaps are typically based on 3-month LIBOR. Because our derivative portfolio consists of a higher proportion of pay-fixed swaps than receive-fixed swaps, the net periodic derivative cash settlements interest expense amounts generally change based on changes in the floating interest amount received each period. When the 3-month LIBOR rate increases during the period, the received floating interest amounts on our pay-fixed swaps increase and, conversely, when the 3-month LIBOR swap rate decreases, the received floating interest amounts on our pay-fixed swaps decrease. The 3-month LIBOR rate began to increase during the second half of fiscal year 2022, resulting in an increase in received floating interest amounts and contributing to lower net periodic derivative cash settlements interest expense amounts in the current fiscal year. In contrast, the 3-month LIBOR rate decreased during fiscal year 2021 resulting in a reduction in received floating interest amounts and contributing to higher net periodic derivative cash settlements interest expense amounts in the prior fiscal year.

See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” for additional information on our adjusted measures, including a reconciliation of these measures to the most comparable U.S. GAAP measures.


42


Provision for Credit Losses

Our provision for credit losses each period is driven by changes in our measurement of lifetime expected credit losses for our loan portfolio recorded in the allowance for credit losses. Our allowance for credit losses and allowance coverage ratio were $68 million and 0.22%, respectively, as of May 31, 2022. In comparison, our allowance for credit losses and allowance coverage ratio were $86 million and 0.30%, respectively, as of May 31, 2021.

We recorded a benefit for credit losses of $18 million for fiscal year 2022. In contrast, we recorded a provision for credit losses of $29 million for fiscal year 2021. The current fiscal year benefit was primarily attributable to a decrease in the collective allowance, stemming largely from positive developments during fiscal year 2022 related to Rayburn that resulted in an improvement in Rayburn’s credit risk profile and also a significant reduction in our loans outstanding to Rayburn. In June 2021, Texas enacted securitization legislation that offers a financing program for qualifying electric cooperatives exposed to elevated power costs during the February 2021 polar vortex. In February 2022, Rayburn successfully completed a securitization transaction pursuant to this legislation to cover extraordinary costs and expenses incurred during the February 2021 polar vortex. Subsequent to the completion of the securitization transaction, Rayburn fully paid its outstanding obligations to ERCOT. As a result, we revised our borrower risk rating for Rayburn to a rating in the pass category from a previous rating in the criticized category. In addition, we received loan payments from Rayburn during fiscal year 2022 that reduced our loans outstanding to Rayburn to $167 million as of May 31, 2022, consisting of secured and unsecured loans outstanding of $151 million and $16 million, respectively. Loans outstanding to Rayburn totaled $379 million as of the prior fiscal year ended May 31, 2021, consisting of secured and unsecured loans outstanding of $167 million and $212 million, respectively.

The provision for credit losses of $29 million recorded for fiscal year 2021 reflected the allowance build due to the significant adverse financial impact on Brazos and Rayburn resulting from their exposure to elevated wholesale electric power supply costs during the February 2021 polar vortex.

We discuss our methodology for estimating the allowance for credit losses in “Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies—Allowance for Credit Losses—Current Methodology.” We also provide additional information on our allowance for credit losses below under section “Credit Risk—Allowance for Credit Losses” and “Note 5—Allowance for Credit Losses” in this Report.

Non-Interest Income

Non-interest income consists of fee and other income, gains and losses on derivatives not accounted for in hedge accounting relationships, and gains and losses on equity and debt investment securities, which consists of both unrealized and realized
gains and losses.

Table 4 presents the components of non-interest income (loss) recorded in our consolidated statements of operations for fiscal years 2022, 2021 and 2020.

Table 4: Non-Interest Income
 Year Ended May 31,
(Dollars in thousands)202220212020
Non-interest income components:
Fee and other income$17,193 $18,929 $22,961 
Derivative gains (losses)456,482 506,301 (790,151)
Investment securities gains (losses)(30,179)1,495 9,431 
Total non-interest income (loss)$443,496 $526,725 $(757,759)

The significant variance in non-interest income between fiscal years was primarily attributable to changes in the derivative gains (losses) recognized in our consolidated statements of operations. In addition, we experienced an unfavorable shift in unrealized investment securities gains of $32 million for the current fiscal year compared with the prior fiscal year. We


43


expect period-to-period market fluctuations in the fair value of our equity and debt investment securities, which we report together with realized gains and losses from the sale of investment securities on our consolidated statements of operations.

Derivative Gains (Losses)

Our derivative instruments are an integral part of our interest rate risk-management strategy. Our principal purpose in using derivatives is to manage our aggregate interest rate risk profile within prescribed risk parameters. The derivative instruments we use primarily include interest rate swaps, which we typically hold to maturity. In addition, we may on occasion use treasury locks to manage the interest rate risk associated with debt that is scheduled to reprice in the future. The primary factors affecting the fair value of our derivatives and derivative gains (losses) recorded in our results of operations include changes in interest rates, the shape of the swap curve and the composition of our derivative portfolio. We generally do not designate our interest rate swaps, which currently account for all our derivatives, for hedge accounting. Accordingly, changes in the fair value of interest rate swaps are reported in our consolidated statements of operations under derivative gains (losses). However, if we execute a treasury lock, we typically designate the treasury lock as a cash flow hedge.

We currently use two types of interest rate swap agreements: (i) we pay a fixed rate of interest and receive a variable rate of interest (“pay-fixed swaps”), and (ii) we pay a variable rate of interest and receive a fixed rate of interest (“receive-fixed swaps”). The interest amounts are based on a specified notional balance, which is used for calculation purposes only. The benchmark variable rate for the substantial majority of the floating-rate payments under our swap agreements is 3-month LIBOR. As interest rates decline, pay-fixed swaps generally decrease in value and result in the recognition of derivative losses, as the amount of interest we pay remains fixed, while the amount of interest we receive declines. In contrast, as interest rates rise, pay-fixed swaps generally increase in value and result in the recognition of derivative gains, as the amount of interest we pay remains fixed, but the amount we receive increases. With a receive-fixed swap, the opposite results occur as interest rates decline or rise. Our derivative portfolio consists of a higher proportion of pay-fixed swaps than receive-fixed swaps; therefore, we generally record derivative losses when interest rates decline and derivative gains when interest rates rise. Because our pay-fixed and receive-fixed swaps are referenced to different maturity terms along the swap curve, different changes in the swap curve—parallel, flattening, inversion or steepening—will also impact the fair value of our derivatives.
On July 20, 2021, we executed two treasury lock agreements with an aggregate notional amount of $250 million to lock in the underlying U.S. Treasury interest rate component of interest rate payments on anticipated debt issuances and repricings. The treasury locks, which were scheduled to mature on October 29, 2021, were designated and qualified as cash flow hedges. In October 2021, we borrowed $250 million under our Farmer Mac revolving note purchase agreement and terminated the treasury locks. Prior to this anticipated borrowing and the termination of the treasury locks, we recorded changes in the fair value of the treasury locks in AOCI. At termination, the treasury locks were in a gain position of $5 million, of which $4 million is being accreted from AOCI to interest expense over the term of the related Farmer Mac borrowings and the remainder was recognized in earnings. We did not have any derivatives designated as accounting hedges as of May 31, 2022 or May 31, 2021.

Table 5 presents the components of net derivative gains (losses) recorded in our consolidated statements of operations for fiscal years 2022, 2021 and 2020. Derivative cash settlements interest expense represents the net periodic contractual interest amount for our interest rate swaps during the reporting period. Derivative forward value gains (losses) represent the change in fair value of our interest rate swaps during the applicable reporting period due to changes in expected future interest rates over the remaining life of our derivative contracts.

Table 5: Derivative Gains (Losses)
Year Ended May 31,
(Dollars in thousands)202220212020
Derivative gains (losses) attributable to:
Derivative cash settlements interest expense$(101,385)$(115,645)$(55,873)
Derivative forward value gains (losses)557,867 621,946 (734,278)
Derivative gains (losses)$456,482 $506,301 $(790,151)



44


We recorded derivative gains of $456 million for fiscal year 2022, attributable to increases in interest rates across the entire swap curve during the period. In contrast, we recorded derivative gains of $506 million for fiscal year 2021, driven by pronounced increases in medium- and longer-term swap rates, namely five-year to 30-year swap rates.

As noted above, the substantial majority of our swap portfolio consists of longer-dated, pay-fixed swaps. Therefore, increases and decreases in medium- and longer-term swap rates generally have a more pronounced corresponding impact on the change in the net fair value of our swap portfolio. We present comparative swap curves, which depict the relationship between swap rates at varying maturities, for our reported periods in Table 7 below.

Derivative Cash Settlements

As indicated in Table 5 above, and discussed above under “Consolidated Results of Operations—Net Interest Income—Adjusted Net Interest Income,” we recorded net periodic derivative cash settlements interest expense of $101 million in fiscal year 2022, compared with $116 million for fiscal year 2021. The 3-month LIBOR rate began to increase during the second half of fiscal year 2022, resulting in an increase in received floating interest amounts and contributing to lower net periodic derivative cash settlements interest expense amounts in the current fiscal year. In contrast, the 3-month LIBOR rate decreased during fiscal year 2021, resulting in a reduction in received floating interest amounts and contributing to higher net periodic derivative cash settlements interest expense amounts in the prior fiscal year.

Table 6 displays, by interest rate swap agreement type, the average notional amount and the weighted-average interest rate paid and received for the net periodic derivative cash settlements interest expense during each respective period. As discussed above, our derivative portfolio consists of a higher proportion of pay-fixed swaps than receive-fixed swaps, with pay-fixed swaps accounting for approximately 75% and 73% of the outstanding notional amount of our derivative portfolio as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

Table 6: Derivatives—Average Notional Amounts and Interest Rates
Year Ended May 31,
 202220212020
AverageWeighted-AverageWeighted-AverageWeighted-
NotionalAverage RateNotionalAverage RateNotionalAverage Rate
(Dollars in thousands)AmountPaidReceivedAmountPaidReceivedAmountPaidReceived
Interest rate swap type:
Pay-fixed swaps$6,145,318 2.61 %0.36 %$6,566,734 2.73 %0.27 %$7,092,961 2.82 %1.91 %
Receive-fixed swaps2,260,663 1.01 2.82 2,494,890 1.03 2.78 3,086,705 2.62 2.64 
Total$8,405,981 2.18 %1.03 %$9,061,624 2.26 %0.96 %$10,179,666 2.76 %2.13 %

The average remaining maturity of our pay-fixed and receive-fixed swaps was 19 years and three years, respectively, as of both May 31, 2022 and 2021.


















45


Comparative Swap Curves

Table 7 below provides comparative swap curves as of May 31, 2022, 2021, 2020 and 2019.

Table 7: Comparative Swap Curves
nru-20220531_g1.jpg____________________________
Benchmark rates obtained from Bloomberg.

See “Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies—Derivative Instruments” and “Note 10—Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” for additional information on our derivative instruments. Also refer to “Note 14—Fair Value Measurement” for information on how we measure the fair value of our derivative instruments.

Non-Interest Expense

Non-interest expense consists of salaries and employee benefit expense, general and administrative expenses, gains and losses on the early extinguishment of debt and other miscellaneous expenses.

Table 8 presents the components of non-interest expense recorded in our consolidated statements of operations in fiscal years 2022, 2021 and 2020.



46


Table 8: Non-Interest Expense
 Year Ended May 31,
(Dollars in thousands)202220212020
Non-interest expense components:
Salaries and employee benefits$(51,863)$(55,258)$(54,522)
Other general and administrative expenses(43,323)(39,447)(46,645)
Operating expenses(95,186)(94,705)(101,167)
Losses on early extinguishment of debt(754)(1,456)(683)
Other non-interest expense(1,552)(1,619)(25,588)
Total non-interest expense$(97,492)$(97,780)$(127,438)

Non-interest expense of $97 million for fiscal year 2022 decreased slightly from fiscal year 2021, as the decrease in salaries and employee benefits and lower losses on the early extinguishment of debt, were largely offset by an increase in other general and administrative expenses as we resumed business travel and in-person corporate meetings and events that were cancelled during the prior fiscal year due to the pandemic.

Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests represents 100% of the results of operations of NCSC and RTFC, as the members of NCSC and RTFC own or control 100% of the interest in their respective companies. The fluctuations in net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests are primarily due to changes in the fair value of NCSC’s derivative instruments recognized in NCSC’s earnings.

We recorded a net income attributable to noncontrolling interests of $3 million for fiscal year 2022. In comparison, we recorded a net income attributable to noncontrolling interests of $2 million for fiscal years 2021 and a net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests of $4 million for fiscal year 2020.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET ANALYSIS

Total assets increased $1,613 million, or 5%, in fiscal year 2022 to $31,251 million as of May 31, 2022, primarily due to growth in our loan portfolio. We experienced an increase in total liabilities of $871 million, or 3%, to $29,109 million as of May 31, 2022, largely due to the issuances of debt to fund the growth in our loan portfolio. Total equity increased $742 million to $2,142 million as of May 31, 2022, attributable to our reported net income of $799 million for the current fiscal year, which was partially offset by the CFC Board of Directors’ authorized patronage capital retirement in July 2021 of $58 million.

Below is a discussion of changes in the major components of our assets and liabilities during fiscal year 2022. Period-end balance sheet amounts may vary from average balance sheet amounts due to liquidity and balance sheet management activities that are intended to manage our liquidity requirements and market risk exposure in accordance with our risk appetite framework.

Loan Portfolio

We segregate our loan portfolio into segments, by legal entity, based on the borrower member class, which consists of CFC distribution, CFC power supply, CFC statewide and associate, NCSC and RTFC. We offer both long-term and line of credit loans to our borrowers. Under our long-term loan facilities, a borrower may select a fixed interest rate or a variable interest rate at the time of each loan advance. Line of credit loans are revolving loan facilities and generally have a variable interest rate. We describe and provide additional information on our member classes under “Item 1. Business—Members” and information about our loan programs and loan product types under “Item 1. Business—Loan and Guarantee Programs” in this Report.




47


Loans Outstanding

Table 9 presents loans outstanding by legal entity, member class and loan product type as of May 31, 2022 and 2021.

Table 9: Loans—Outstanding Amount by Member Class and Loan Type
May 31,
(Dollars in thousands)20222021
Member class:Amount% of TotalAmount% of TotalChange
CFC:    
Distribution$23,844,242 79 %$22,027,423 78 %$1,816,819 
Power supply4,901,770 17 5,154,312 18 (252,542)
Statewide and associate126,863  106,121 — 20,742 
CFC28,872,875 96 27,287,856 96 1,585,019 
NCSC710,878 2 706,868 4,010 
RTFC467,601 2 420,383 47,218 
Total loans outstanding(1)
30,051,354 100 %28,415,107 100 %1,636,247 
Deferred loan origination costs—CFC(2)
12,032 — 11,854 — 178 
Loans to members$30,063,386 100 %$28,426,961 100 %$1,636,425 
Loan type:
Long-term loans:    
Fixed-rate$26,952,372 90 %$25,514,766 90 %$1,437,606 
Variable-rate820,201 2 658,579 161,622 
Total long-term loans27,772,573 92 26,173,345 92 1,599,228 
Line of credit loans2,278,781 8 2,241,762 37,019 
Total loans outstanding(1)
30,051,354 100 %28,415,107 100 %1,636,247 
Deferred loan origination costs—CFC(2)
12,032  11,854 — 178 
Loans to members$30,063,386 100 %$28,426,961 100 %$1,636,425 
____________________________
(1) Represents the unpaid principal balance, net of charge-offs and recoveries, of loans as of the end of each period.
(2)Deferred loan origination costs are recorded on the books of CFC.

Loans to members totaled $30,063 million and $28,427 million as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Loans to CFC distribution and power supply borrowers accounted for 96% of total loans to members as of both May 31, 2022 and 2021, and long-term fixed-rate loans accounted for 90% of loans to members as of both May 31, 2022 and 2021. The increase in loans to members of $1,636 million, or 6%, from May 31, 2021, was attributable to net increases in long-term and line of credit loans of $1,599 million and $37 million, respectively. We experienced increases in CFC distribution loans, CFC statewide and associate loans, NCSC loans and RTFC loans of $1,817 million, $21 million, $4 million and $47 million, respectively, and a decrease in CFC power supply loans of $253 million.

Long-term loan advances totaled $3,386 million during fiscal year 2022, of which approximately 80% was provided to members for capital expenditures and 18% was provided to members for other expenses, primarily to fund operating expenses attributable to the elevated power cost obligations incurred during the February 2021 polar vortex. In comparison, long-term loan advances totaled $2,514 million during fiscal year 2021, of which approximately 86% was provided to members for capital expenditures and 8% was provided for the refinancing of loans made by other lenders. Of the $3,386 million total long-term loans advanced during fiscal year 2022, $2,911 million were fixed-rate loan advances with a weighted average fixed-rate term of 23 years.

Many rural electric distribution cooperatives have made or are making infrastructure investments that include building fiber optic lines to improve electric grid system reliability and efficiency, as fiber operations offers enhanced communication to monitor electric systems, identify outages and speed electric restoration. Some of these electric cooperatives are leveraging


48


these fiber assets to offer access to broadband services, either directly or by partnering with local telecommunication companies and others, to the communities they serve. Aggregate loans outstanding to CFC electric distribution cooperative members relating to broadband projects, which we started tracking in October 2017, increased to an estimated $1,647 million as of May 31, 2022, from approximately $854 million as of May 31, 2021. Many of these broadband projects are also financially supported by various states and the federal government, which reduces the credit risk for CFC and our electric cooperative members. We expect our member electric cooperatives to continue in their efforts to expand broadband access to unserved and underserved communities.

We provide information on the credit performance and risk profile of our loan portfolio below under the section “Credit Risk—Loan Portfolio Credit Risk” in this Report. Also refer to “Item 1. Business—Loan and Guarantee Programs” and “Note 4—Loans” in this Report for addition information on our loans to members.”

Loans—Retention Rate

Long-term fixed-rate loans accounted for 90% as of both May 31, 2022 and 2021 of our loans to members of $30,063 million and $28,427 million, respectively. Borrowers that select a fixed rate on a loan advance under a long-term loan facility have the option of choosing a term on the advance between one year and the final maturity date of the loan. At the expiration of a selected fixed-rate term, or the repricing date, borrowers have the option of: (i) selecting CFC’s current long-term fixed rate for a term ranging from one year up to the full remaining term of the loan; (ii) selecting CFC’s current long-term variable rate; or (iii) repaying the loan in full.

The continued low interest rate environment over the last several years presented an opportunity for our members to obtain new long-term loan advances at a lower fixed-to-maturity interest rate or lock in a lower fixed interest rate to maturity at the repricing date on existing outstanding long-term loan advances. Because many of our members have locked in at or near historic low interest rates on outstanding loan advances for extended terms, the amount of long-term fixed-rate loans that repriced during each fiscal year over the last five fiscal years has gradually decreased, from $987 million in fiscal year 2017 to $379 million in fiscal year 2022. Long-term fixed-rate loans scheduled to reprice over the next 12 months totaled $338 million as of May 31, 2022, and long-term fixed-rate loans scheduled to reprice over the subsequent five fiscal years through the fiscal year ended May 31, 2027 totaled $1,584 million as of May 31, 2022, representing an average of $317 million per fiscal year.

CFC’s long-term fixed-rate loans that repriced in accordance with our standard loan repricing provisions totaled $379 million during fiscal year 2022. Of this total, $361 million, or 95%, was retained and the remaining amount was repaid. The average annual retention rate, calculated based on the election made by the borrower at the repricing date, was 97% for CFC loans that repriced during each of the three fiscal years ended May 31, 2022.

Debt

We utilize both short-term borrowings and long-term debt as part of our funding strategy and asset/liability interest rate risk management. We seek to maintain diversified funding sources, including our members, affiliates, the capital markets and other funding sources, across products, programs and markets to manage funding concentrations and reduce our liquidity or debt rollover risk. Our funding sources include a variety of secured and unsecured debt securities in a wide range of maturities to our members, affiliates, the capital markets and other funding sources.

Debt Product Types

We offer various short- and long-term unsecured debt securities to our members and affiliates, including commercial paper, select notes, daily liquidity fund notes, medium-term notes and subordinated certificates. We also issue commercial paper, medium-term notes and collateral trust bonds in the capital markets. Additionally, we have access to funds under borrowing arrangements with banks, private placements and U.S. government agencies. Table 10 displays our primary funding sources and their selected key attributes.



49


Table 10: Debt—Debt Product Types
Debt Product Type:Maturity RangeMarketSecured/Unsecured
Short-term funding programs:
Commercial paper1 to 270 daysCapital markets, members and affiliatesUnsecured
Select notes30 to 270 daysMembers and affiliatesUnsecured
Daily liquidity fund notesDemand noteMembers and affiliatesUnsecured
Securities sold under repurchase agreements1 to 90 daysCapital marketsSecured
Other funding programs:
Medium-term notes9 months to 30 yearsCapital markets, members and affiliatesUnsecured
Collateral trust bonds(1)
Up to 30 yearsCapital marketsSecured
Guaranteed Underwriter Program notes payable(2)
Up to 30 yearsU.S. governmentSecured
Farmer Mac notes payable(3)
Up to 30 yearsPrivate placementSecured
Other notes payable(4)
Up to 3 yearsPrivate placementBoth
Subordinated deferrable debt(5)
Up to 45 yearsCapital marketsUnsecured
Members’ subordinated certificates(6)
Up to 100 yearsMembersUnsecured
Revolving credit agreementsUp to 5 yearsBank institutionsUnsecured
____________________________
(1)Collateral trust bonds are secured by the pledge of permitted investments and eligible mortgage notes from distribution system borrowers in an amount at least equal to the outstanding principal amount of collateral trust bonds.
(2)Represents notes payable under the Guaranteed Underwriter Program, which supports the Rural Economic Development Loan and Grant program. The Federal Financing Bank provides the financing for these notes, and RUS provides a guarantee of repayment. We are required to pledge eligible mortgage notes from distribution and power supply system borrowers in an amount at least equal to the outstanding principal amount of the notes payable.
(3)We are required to pledge eligible mortgage notes from distribution and power supply system borrowers in an amount at least equal to the outstanding principal amount under note purchase agreements with Farmer Mac.
(4)Other notes payable consist of unsecured and secured Clean Renewable Energy Bonds. We are required to pledge eligible mortgage notes from distribution and power supply system borrowers in an amount at least equal to the outstanding principal amount under the Clean Renewable Energy Bonds Series 2009A note purchase agreement.
(5)Subordinated deferrable debt is subordinate and junior to senior debt and debt obligations we guarantee, but senior to subordinated certificates. We have the right at any time, and from time to time, during the term of the subordinated deferrable debt to suspend interest payments for a maximum period of 20 consecutive quarters for $1,000 par notes, or a maximum period of 40 consecutive quarters for $25 par notes. To date, we have not exercised our option to suspend interest payments. We have the right to call the subordinated deferrable debt, at par, any time after 10 years for $1,000 par notes or 5 years for $25 par notes.
(6)Members’ subordinated certificates consist of membership subordinated certificates, loan and guarantee certificates and member capital securities, and are subordinated and junior to senior debt, subordinated debt and debt obligations we guarantee. Membership subordinated certificates generally mature 100 years subsequent to issuance. Loan and guarantee subordinated certificates have the same maturity as the related long-term loan. Some certificates also may amortize annually based on the outstanding loan balance. Member capital securities mature 30 years subsequent to issuance. Member capital securities are callable at par beginning either five or 10 years subsequent to the issuance and anytime thereafter.

Debt Outstanding

Table 11 displays the composition, by product type, of our outstanding debt and the weighted average interest rate as of May 31, 2022 and 2021. Table 11 also displays the composition of our debt based on several additional selected attributes.












50


Table 11: Total Debt Outstanding and Weighted-Average Interest Rates
May 31,
 20222021
(Dollars in thousands)Outstanding AmountWeighted-
Average
Interest Rate
Outstanding AmountWeighted-
Average
Interest Rate
Change
Debt product type:
Commercial Paper:
Members, at par$1,358,0690.92 %$1,124,6070.14 %$233,462
Dealer, net of discounts1,024,8130.96 894,9770.16 129,836
Total commercial paper2,382,8820.94 2,019,5840.15 363,298
Select notes to members1,753,4411.11 1,539,1500.30 214,291
Daily liquidity fund notes to members427,7900.80 460,5560.08 (32,766)
Securities sold under repurchase agreements 200,1150.30 (200,115)
Medium-term notes:
Members, at par667,4511.43 595,0371.28 72,414
Dealer, net of discounts5,241,6872.20 3,923,3852.31 1,318,302
Total medium-term notes5,909,1382.11 4,518,4222.17 1,390,716
Collateral trust bonds6,848,4903.17 7,191,9443.15 (343,454)
Guaranteed Underwriter Program notes payable6,105,4732.69 6,269,3032.76 (163,830)
Farmer Mac notes payable3,094,6792.33 2,977,9091.68 116,770
Other notes payable4,7141.80 8,2361.68 (3,522)
Subordinated deferrable debt986,5185.11 986,3155.11 203
Members’ subordinated certificates:
Membership subordinated certificates628,6034.95 628,5944.95 9
Loan and guarantee subordinated certificates365,3882.88 386,8962.89 (21,508)
Member capital securities240,1705.00 239,1705.00 1,000
Total members’ subordinated certificates1,234,1614.35 1,254,6604.32 (20,499)
Total debt outstanding$28,747,2862.54 %$27,426,1942.42 %$1,321,092
Security type:
Secured debt56 %61 %
Unsecured debt44 39 
Total100 %100 %
Funding source:
Members19 %18 %
Private placement:
Guaranteed Underwriter Program notes payable21 23 
Farmer Mac notes payable11 11 
Total private placement32 34 
Capital markets49 48 
Total100 %100 %
Interest rate type:
Fixed-rate debt77 %77 %
Variable-rate debt23 23 
Total100 %100 %
Interest rate type including the impact of swaps:
Fixed-rate debt(1)
91 % 93 % 
Variable-rate debt(2)
9   
Total100 %100 %
Maturity classification:(3)
Short-term borrowings17 % 17 % 
Long-term and subordinated debt(4)
83  83  
Total100 %100 %
____________________________


51


(1) Includes variable-rate debt that has been swapped to a fixed rate, net of any fixed-rate debt that has been swapped to a variable rate.
(2) Includes fixed-rate debt that has been swapped to a variable rate, net of any variable-rate debt that has been swapped to a fixed rate. Also includes commercial paper notes, which generally have maturities of less than 90 days. The interest rate on commercial paper notes does not change once the note has been issued; however, the interest rate for new commercial paper issuances changes daily.
(3) Borrowings with an original contractual maturity of one year or less are classified as short-term borrowings. Borrowings with an original contractual maturity of greater than one year are classified as long-term debt.
(4) Consists of long-term debt, subordinated deferrable debt and total members’ subordinated debt reported on our consolidated balance sheets. Maturity classification is based on the original contractual maturity as of the date of issuance of the debt.

We issue debt primarily to fund growth in our loan portfolio. As such, our debt outstanding generally increases and decreases in response to member loan demand. Total debt outstanding increased $1,321 million, or 5%, to $28,747 million as of May 31, 2022, due to borrowings to fund the increase in loans to members. Outstanding dealer commercial paper of $1,025 million as of May 31, 2022 was within our quarter-end target range of $1,000 million and $1,500 million.

Below is a summary of significant financing activities during fiscal year 2022:

On June 7, 2021, we amended the three-year and five-year committed bank revolving line of credit agreements to extend the maturity dates to November 28, 2024 and November 28, 2025, respectively, and to terminate certain bank commitments totaling $70 million under the three-year agreement and $55 million under the five-year agreement. The terminations reduced the total commitment amount under the three-year facility to $1,245 million and the five-year facility to $1,355 million, resulting in an aggregate commitment amount under the two facilities of $2,600 million.
On October 18, 2021, we issued $400 million aggregate principal amount of dealer medium-term notes at a fixed rate of 1.000%, due on October 18, 2024, and $350 million aggregate principal amount of dealer medium-term notes at a variable rate based on SOFR plus 0.33%, due on October 18, 2024.
In October 2021, November 2021, January 2022 and May 2022, we borrowed $250 million, $200 million, $170 million, and $100 million respectively, under the Farmer Mac revolving note purchase agreement.
In November 2021 and February 2022, we borrowed $200 million and $250 million, respectively, under the Guaranteed Underwriter Program.
On November 4, 2021, we closed on a $550 million committed loan facility (“Series S”) under the Guaranteed Underwriter Program. Pursuant to this facility, we may borrow any time before July 15, 2026. Each advance is subject to quarterly amortization and a final maturity not longer than 30 years from the date of the advance.
On November 15, 2021, we early redeemed all $400 million of our 3.05% Collateral Trust Bonds due February 15, 2022.
On February 7, 2022, we issued $600 million aggregate principal amount of dealer medium-term notes at a fixed rate of 1.875%, due on February 7, 2025, and $400 million aggregate principal amount of dealer medium-term notes at a variable rate based on SOFR plus 0.40%, due on August 7, 2023.
On February 7, 2022, we issued $500 million aggregate principal amount of 2.75% Collateral Trust Bonds due April 15, 2032.
On March 25, 2022, we early redeemed all $450 million of our 2.40% of Collateral Trust Bonds due April 25, 2022.
On May 4, 2022, we issued $300 million aggregate principal amount of dealer medium-term notes at a fixed rate of 3.450%, due June 15, 2025.
On May 9, 2022, we issued $100 million aggregate principal amount of dealer medium-term notes at a fixed rate of 3.859%, due June 15, 2029.











52


Member Investments

Debt securities issued to our members represent an important, stable source of funding. Table 12 displays member debt outstanding, by product type, as of May 31, 2022 and 2021.

Table 12: Member Investments
May 31,Change
 20222021
(Dollars in thousands)Amount
% of Total (1)
Amount
% of Total (1)
Member investment product type:
Commercial paper$1,358,06957 %$1,124,60756 %$233,462 
Select notes1,753,441100 1,539,150100 214,291 
Daily liquidity fund notes427,790100 460,556100 (32,766)
Medium-term notes667,45111 595,03713 72,414 
Members’ subordinated certificates1,234,161100 1,254,660100 (20,499)
Total member investments$5,440,912 $4,974,010 $466,902 
Percentage of total debt outstanding19 % 18 %  
____________________________
(1) Represents outstanding debt attributable to members for each debt product type as a percentage of the total outstanding debt for each debt product type.

Member investments accounted for 19% and 18% of total debt outstanding as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Over the last three fiscal years, our member investments have averaged $5,173 million, calculated based on outstanding member investments as of the end of each fiscal quarter during the period.

Short-Term Borrowings

Short-term borrowings consist of borrowings with an original contractual maturity of one year or less and do not include the current portion of long-term debt. Short-term borrowings increased to $4,981 million as of May 31, 2022, from $4,582 million as of May 31, 2021, primarily due to an increase in short-term member investments, and accounted for 17% of total debt outstanding as of each respective date. See “Liquidity Risk” below and “Note 6—Short-Term Borrowings” for information on the composition of our short-term borrowings.

Long-Term and Subordinated Debt

Long-term debt, defined as debt with an original contractual maturity term of greater than one year, primarily consists of medium-term notes, collateral trust bonds, notes payable under the Guaranteed Underwriter Program and notes payable under our Farmer Mac revolving note purchase agreement. Subordinated debt consists of subordinated deferrable debt and members’ subordinated certificates. Our subordinated deferrable debt and members’ subordinated certificates have original contractual maturity terms of greater than one year.

Long-term and subordinated debt of $23,766 million and $22,844 million as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, accounted for 83% of total debt outstanding as of each respective date. We provide additional information on our long-term debt below under the section “Liquidity Risk” and “Note 7—Long-Term Debt” and “Note 8—Subordinated Deferrable Debt” in this Report.









53


Equity

Table 13 presents the components of total CFC equity and total equity as of May 31, 2022 and 2021.

Table 13: Equity
May 31,Change
(Dollars in thousands)20222021
Equity components:
Membership fees and educational fund:
Membership fees$970 $968 $
Educational fund2,417 2,157 260 
Total membership fees and educational fund3,387 3,125 262 
Patronage capital allocated954,988 923,970 31,018 
Members’ capital reserve1,062,286 909,749 152,537 
Total allocated equity2,020,661 1,836,844 183,817 
Unallocated net income (loss):
Prior fiscal year-end cumulative derivative forward value losses(1)
(461,162)(1,079,739)618,577 
Year-to-date derivative forward value gains(1)
553,525 618,577 (65,052)
Period-end cumulative derivative forward value gains (losses)(1)
92,363 (461,162)553,525 
Other unallocated net loss(709)(709)— 
Unallocated net income (loss)91,654 (461,871)553,525 
CFC retained equity2,112,315 1,374,973 737,342 
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)2,258 (25)2,283 
Total CFC equity2,114,573 1,374,948 739,625 
Noncontrolling interests27,396 24,931 2,465 
Total equity$2,141,969 $1,399,879 $742,090 
____________________________
(1)Represents derivative forward value gains (losses) for CFC only, as total CFC equity does not include the noncontrolling interests of the variable interest entities NCSC and RTFC, which we are required to consolidate. We present the consolidated total derivative forward value gains (losses) in Table 37 in the “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” section below. Also, see “Note 16—Business Segments” for the statements of operations for CFC.

The increase in total equity of $742 million to $2,142 million as of May 31, 2022 was attributable to our reported net income of $799 million for fiscal year 2022, partially offset by the CFC Board of Directors’ authorized patronage capital retirement in July 2021 of $58 million.

Allocation and Retirement of Patronage Capital

We are subject to District of Columbia law governing cooperatives, under which CFC is required to make annual allocations of net earnings, if any, in accordance with the provisions of the District of Columbia statutes. District of Columbia cooperative law requires cooperatives to allocate net earnings to patrons, to a general reserve in an amount sufficient to maintain a balance of at least 50% of paid-up capital and to a cooperative educational fund, as well as permits additional allocations to board-approved reserves. District of Columbia cooperative law also requires that a cooperative’s net earnings be allocated to all patrons in proportion to their individual patronage and each patron’s allocation be distributed to the patron unless the patron agrees that the cooperative may retain its share as additional capital. Pursuant to these provisions, the CFC Board of Directors is required to make annual allocations of net earnings, if any. CFC’s net earnings for determining allocations is based on non-GAAP adjusted net income, which excludes the impact of derivative forward value gains (losses). We provide a reconciliation of our adjusted net income to our reported net income and an explanation of the adjustments below in “Non-GAAP Financial Measures.”



54


In May 2022, the CFC Board of Directors authorized the allocation of $1 million of net earnings for fiscal year 2022 to the cooperative educational fund. In July 2022, the CFC Board of Directors authorized the allocation of fiscal year 2022 adjusted net income follows: $89 million to members in the form of patronage capital and $153 million to the members’ capital reserve. In July 2022, the CFC Board of Directors also authorized the retirement of patronage capital totaling $59 million, of which $44 million represented 50% of the patronage capital allocation for fiscal year 2022 and $15 million represented the portion of the allocation from fiscal year 1997 net earnings that has been held for 25 years pursuant to the CFC Board of Directors’ policy. We expect to return the authorized patronage capital retirement amount of $59 million to members in cash in the second quarter of fiscal year 2023. The remaining portion of the patronage capital allocation for fiscal year 2022 will be retained by CFC for 25 years pursuant to the guidelines adopted by the CFC Board of Directors in June 2009.

In May 2021, the CFC Board of Directors authorized the allocation of $1 million of net earnings for fiscal year 2021 to the cooperative educational fund. In July 2021 the CFC Board of Directors authorized the allocation of fiscal year 2021 adjusted net income as follows: $90 million to members in the form of patronage capital and $102 million to the members’ capital reserve. In July 2021, the CFC Board of Directors also authorized the retirement of patronage capital totaling $58 million, of which $45 million represented 50% of the patronage capital allocation for fiscal year 2021 and $13 million represented the portion of the allocation from fiscal year 1996 net earnings that has been held for 25 years pursuant to the CFC Board of Directors’ policy. This amount was returned to members in cash in September 2021. The remaining portion of the patronage capital allocation for fiscal year 2021 will be retained by CFC for 25 years pursuant to the guidelines adopted by the CFC Board of Directors in June 2009.

The CFC Board of Directors is required to make annual allocations of adjusted net income, if any. CFC has made annual retirements of allocated net earnings in 42 of the last 43 fiscal years; however, future retirements of allocated amounts are determined based on CFC’s financial condition. The CFC Board of Directors has the authority to change the current practice for allocating and retiring net earnings at any time, subject to applicable laws.

ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT

Overview

We face a variety of risks that can significantly affect our financial performance, liquidity, reputation and ability to meet the expectations of our members, investors and other stakeholders. As a financial services company, the major categories of risk exposures inherent in our business activities include credit risk, liquidity risk, market risk and operational risk. These risk categories are summarized below.

Credit risk is the risk that a borrower or other counterparty will be unable to meet its obligations in accordance with agreed-upon terms.

Liquidity risk is the risk that we will be unable to fund our operations and meet our contractual obligations or that we will be unable to fund new loans to borrowers engagedat a reasonable cost and tenor in similara timely manner.

Market risk is the risk that changes in market variables, such as movements in interest rates, may adversely affect the match between the timing of the contractual maturities, re-pricing and prepayments of our financial assets and the related financial liabilities funding those assets.

Operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal controls, processes, systems, human error or external events, including natural disasters or public health emergencies, such as the current COVID-19 pandemic. Operational risk also includes cybersecurity risk, compliance risk, fiduciary risk, reputational risk and litigation risk.

Effective risk management is critical to our overall operations and to achieving our primary objective of providing cost-based financial products to our rural electric members while maintaining the sound financial results required for investment-grade credit ratings on our rated debt instruments. Accordingly, we have a risk-management framework that is intended to govern the principal risks we face in conducting our business and the aggregate amount of risk we are willing to accept, referred to as risk appetite and risk guidelines, in the context of CFC’s mission and strategic objectives and initiatives.


55


Risk-Management Framework

Our Enterprise Risk Management (“ERM”) framework consists of a defined policy and process for measuring, assessing and responding to key risks in alignment with CFC’s mission and CFC’s Board of Director’s strategic objectives. The board of directors has responsibility for the oversight and strategic direction of the ERM framework and has adopted a comprehensive risk-management policy that describes the roles and responsibilities of the board and management within this framework for identifying and managing risks. In fulfilling its risk-management oversight duties, the board of directors receives periodic reports on business activities and risk-management activities from management. Throughout the year at its periodic meetings, the CFC Board of Directors reviews important trends and emerging developments across key risks as assessed, measured and evaluated by management. The board also establishes CFC’s loan policies and has established a Loan Committee of the board comprising no fewer than 10 directors that reviews the performance of the loan portfolio in accordance with those policies. For additional information about the role of the CFC Board of Directors in risk governance and oversight, see “Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.”

Management is primarily accountable for execution of the ERM responsibilities and daily management of the risks associated with our business. Management executes its responsibility by establishing processes for identifying, measuring, assessing, managing, monitoring and reporting risks. Management also is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal controls to mitigate key risks. We have a number of management-level risk oversight committees across the organization and groups within the organization that have a defined set of authorities and responsibilities specific to one or more risk types, including the Corporate Credit Committee, Asset Liability Committee, Investment Management Committee, and Disclosure Committee. Management provides reports to the board of directors at each regularly scheduled board meeting, and more frequently as requested by the board of directors, relating to, among other things, the ongoing progress of managing risk at CFC given the ERM framework; management’s responses for the critical business risks identified during the risk assessment process and the status of any gaps or deficiencies; and CFC’s risk profile and trends, as well as emerging risks and opportunities.

CREDIT RISK

Our loan portfolio, which represents the largest component of assets on our balance sheet, accounts for the substantial majority of our credit risk exposure. We also engage in geographic areascertain non-lending activities that would cause themmay give rise to counterparty credit risk, such as entering into derivative transactions to manage interest rate risk and purchasing investment securities.

Credit Risk Management

We manage credit risk related to our loan portfolio consistent with credit policies established by the CFC Board of Directors and through credit underwriting, approval and monitoring processes and practices adopted by management. Our board-established credit policies include guidelines regarding the types of credit products we offer, limits on credit we extend to individual borrowers, approval authorities delegated to management, and use of syndications and loan sales. We maintain an internal risk rating system in which we assign a rating to each borrower and credit facility. We review and update the risk ratings at least annually. Assigned risk ratings inform our credit approval, borrower monitoring and portfolio review processes. Our Corporate Credit Committee approves individual credit actions within its own authority and together with our Credit Risk Management group, establishes standards for credit underwriting, oversees credits deemed to be similarly impacted by economic or other conditions or when therehigher risk, reviews assigned risk ratings for accuracy, and monitors the overall credit quality and performance statistics of our loan portfolio.

Loan Portfolio Credit Risk

Our primary credit exposure is loans to rural electric cooperatives, which provide essential electric services to end-users, the majority of which are large exposuresresidential customers. We also have a limited portfolio of loans to single borrowers.not-for-profit and for-profit telecommunication companies. As a tax-exempt, member-owned finance cooperative, CFC’s principal focus is to provide funding to its rural

electric utility cooperative members to assist them in acquiring, constructing and operating electric distribution systems, power supply systems and related facilities. Loans outstanding to electric utility organizations totaled $29,584 million and $27,995 million as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, representing 98% and 99% of total loans outstanding as of each respective date. The remaining loans outstanding in our loan portfolio were to RTFC members,


56


affiliates and associates in the telecommunications industry sector. The substantial majority of loans to our borrowers are long-term fixed-rate loans with terms of up to 35 years. Long-term fixed-rate loans accounted for 90% of total loans outstanding as of both May 31, 2022 and 2021.

Because we lend primarily to our rural electric utility cooperative members, we have had a loan portfolio inherently subject to single-industry and single-obligor credit concentration risks. Outstanding loans to electric utility organizations represented approximately 99% ofrisk since our total outstanding loan portfolio as of May 31, 2019, unchanged from May 31, 2018. Although our organizational structure and mission results in single-industry concentration, we serve a geographically diverse group of electric and telecommunications members throughout the United States and its territories, including all 50 states, the District of Columbia, American Samoa and Guam. Our consolidated membership totaled 1,447 members and 222 associates as of May 31, 2019.

Geographic Concentration

We currently have loans outstanding to borrowers in 49 states. Texas had the largest concentration of outstanding loans to borrowers in any one state, with approximately 15% of total loans outstanding as of both May 31, 2019 and 2018, and also the largest concentration of borrowers, with 70 borrowers as of both May 31, 2019 and 2018. In addition to having the largest number of borrowers, Texas also had the largest concentration of electric power supply borrowers. Electric power supply borrowers generally require significantly more capital than electric distribution and telecommunications borrowers. Of our 67 electric power supply borrowers, eight were located in Texas as of May 31, 2019.

Table 22 presents the number of CFC, NCSC and RTFC borrowers and the percentage of total loans outstanding by state or U.S. territory as of May 31, 2019 and 2018.



Table 22: Loan Geographic Concentration
  May 31,
  2019 2018
U.S. State/Territory 
Number of
Borrowers
 
% of Total Loans
Outstanding
 
Number of
Borrowers
 
% of Total Loans
Outstanding
Texas 70
 15.31% 70
 15.11%
Missouri 47
 5.57
 48
 5.43
Georgia 47
 5.53
 48
 5.83
Colorado 24
 5.46
 26
 5.41
Kansas 31
 4.55
 30
 4.77
Florida 17
 4.31
 17
 3.70
Alaska 17
 3.70
 17
 3.79
Illinois 28
 3.53
 29
 3.65
North Dakota 17
 3.26
 18
 3.42
North Carolina 28
 3.16
 28
 3.01
South Carolina 24
 3.11
 23
 3.05
Indiana 39
 2.88
 37
 2.89
Oklahoma 27
 2.85
 26
 2.86
Kentucky 24
 2.85
 25
 2.86
Minnesota 53
 2.67
 53
 2.84
Arkansas 20
 2.40
 20
 2.26
Ohio 28
 2.29
 28
 2.10
Iowa 38
 2.24
 39
 2.00
Alabama 27
 2.22
 27
 2.28
Pennsylvania 17
 1.96
 17
 2.04
Wisconsin 23
 1.88
 24
 1.91
Maryland 2
 1.72
 2
 1.67
Mississippi 19
 1.64
 19
 1.58
Oregon 20
 1.38
 22
 1.42
Washington 10
 1.30
 11
 1.34
Virginia 18
 1.19
 19
 1.25
Utah 6
 1.17
 6
 1.39
Wyoming 11
 1.16
 13
 0.99
Nevada 8
 0.97
 6
 1.00
Louisiana 10
 0.96
 10
 1.25
Michigan 12
 0.88
 13
 0.92
Montana 25
 0.80
 25
 0.78
Arizona 11
 0.80
 11
 0.73
South Dakota 32
 0.78
 31
 0.86
Tennessee 19
 0.57
 18
 0.51
Idaho 12
 0.49
 12
 0.51
Hawaii 2
 0.46
 2
 0.52
Delaware 3
 0.44
 3
 0.44
New Hampshire 1
 0.33
 1
 0.36
New Mexico 16
 0.24
 16
 0.27
Massachusetts 1
 0.23
 1
 0.24
Vermont 6
 0.20
 5
 0.21
California 4
 0.14
 4
 0.13
New York 7
 0.13
 7
 0.12
Nebraska 13
 0.12
 13
 0.12
New Jersey 1
 0.07
 2
 0.07
West Virginia 2
 0.05
 2
 0.06
Maine 3
 0.03
 3
 0.04
Rhode Island 1
 0.02
 
 
District of Columbia 
 
 1
 0.01
Total 921
 100.00% 928
 100.00%



Single-Obligor Concentration

Table 23 displays the outstanding loan exposure for the 20 largest borrowers, by company, as of May 31, 2019 and 2018. The 20 borrowers with the largest exposure consisted of 10 distribution systems, nine power supply systems and one NCSC associate as of both May 31, 2019 and 2018. The largest total exposure to a single borrower or controlled group represented approximately 2% of total loans outstanding as of both May 31, 2019 and 2018.

Table 23: Loan Exposure to 20 Largest Borrowers
  May 31, Change
   2019 2018 
(Dollars in thousands) Amount % of Total Amount % of Total 
By company:          
CFC $5,369,879
 21 % $5,551,562
 22 % $(181,683)
NCSC 245,559
 1
 257,334
 1
 (11,775)
Total loan exposure to 20 largest borrowers 5,615,438
 22
 5,808,896
 23
 (193,458)
Less: Loans covered under Farmer Mac standby purchase commitment (360,012) (1) (382,132) (2) 22,120
Net loan exposure to 20 largest borrowers $5,255,426
 21 % $5,426,764
 21 % $(171,338)

Although CFC has been exposed to single-industry and single-obligor concentrations since inception in 1969, we1969. We historically, however, have experienced limited defaults and very low credit losses in our electric utility loan portfolio. The likelihood of default and loss for our electric cooperative borrowers, which account for 99% of our outstanding loans as of May 31, 2019, has been lowportfolio due to several factors. First, as discussed above, we generally lend to our members on a senior secured basis. Second, electric cooperatives typically are consumer-owned, not-for-profit entities that provide an essential service to end-users, the majority of which are residential customers. Third,our electric cooperatives face limited competition, as they tend to operate in exclusive territories not serviced by public investor-owned utilities. Fourth, the majoritycooperative borrowers operate in states where electric cooperatives are not subject to rate regulation. Thus, they are able to make rate adjustments to pass along increased costs to the end customer without first obtaining state regulatory approval, allowing them to cover operating costs and generate sufficient earnings and cash flows to service their debt obligations. Finally,Second, electric cooperatives face limited competition, as they tend to operate in exclusive territories not serviced by public investor-owned utilities. Third, electric cooperatives typically are consumer-owned, not-for-profit entities that provide an essential service to end-users, the majority of which are residential customers. As not-for-profit entities, rural electric cooperatives, unlike investor-owned utilities, generally are eligible to apply for assistance from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (“FEMA”) and states to help recover from major disasters or emergencies. Fourth, electric cooperatives tend to adhere to a conservative core business strategy model that has historically resulted in a relatively stable, resilient operating environment and overall strong financial performance and credit strength for the electric cooperative network. Finally, we generally lend to our members on a senior secured basis, which reduces the risk of loss in the event of a borrower default.


Below we provide information on the credit risk profile of our loan portfolio, including security provisions, credit concentration, credit quality indicators and our allowance for credit losses.

Security Provisions

Except when providing line of credit loans, we generally lend to our members on a senior secured basis. Long-term loans are generally secured on parity with other secured lenders (primarily RUS), if any, by all assets and revenue of the borrower with exceptions typical in utility mortgages. Line of credit loans are generally unsecured. In addition to the collateral pledged to secure our loans, distribution and power supply borrowers also are required to set rates charged to customers to achieve certain specified financial ratios. Table 14 presents, by legal entity and member class and by loan type, secured and unsecured loans in our loan portfolio as of May 31, 2022 and 2021. Of our total loans outstanding, 93% were secured as of both May 31, 2022 and 2021.



57


Table 14: Loans—Loan Portfolio Security Profile
May 31, 2022
(Dollars in thousands)Secured% of TotalUnsecured% of TotalTotal
Member class:
CFC:
Distribution$22,405,486 94 %$1,438,756 6 %$23,844,242 
Power supply4,455,098 91 446,6729 4,901,770 
Statewide and associate83,759 66 43,10434 126,863 
Total CFC26,944,343 93 1,928,532 7 28,872,875 
NCSC689,887 97 20,991 3 710,878 
RTFC454,985 97 12,616 3 467,601 
Total loans outstanding(1)
$28,089,215 93 $1,962,139 7 $30,051,354 
Loan type:
Long-term loans:
Fixed-rate$26,731,763 99 %$220,609 1 %$26,952,372 
Variable-rate817,866 100 2,335  820,201 
Total long-term loans27,549,629 99 222,944 1 27,772,573 
Line of credit loans539,586 24 1,739,195 76 2,278,781 
Total loans outstanding(1)
$28,089,215 93 $1,962,139 7 $30,051,354 
May 31, 2021
(Dollars in thousands)Secured% of TotalUnsecured% of TotalTotal
Member class:
CFC:
Distribution$20,702,657 94 %$1,324,766 %$22,027,423 
Power supply4,458,311 86 696,00114 5,154,312 
Statewide and associate88,004 83 18,11717 106,121 
Total CFC25,248,972 93 2,038,884 27,287,856 
NCSC662,782 94 44,086 706,868 
RTFC399,717 95 20,666 420,383 
Total loans outstanding(1)
$26,311,471 93 $2,103,636 $28,415,107 
Loan type:
Long-term loans:
Fixed-rate$25,278,805 99 %$235,961 %$25,514,766 
Variable-rate655,675 100 2,904 — 658,579 
Total long-term loans25,934,480 99 238,865 26,173,345 
Line of credit loans376,991 17 1,864,771 83 2,241,762 
Total loans outstanding(1)
$26,311,471 93 $2,103,636 $28,415,107 
____________________________
(1)Represents the unpaid principal balance, net of charge-offs and recoveries of loans as of the end of each period. Excludes unamortized deferred loan origination costs of $12 million as of both May 31, 2022 and 2021.








58


Credit Quality


We believe the overall credit quality of our loan portfolio remained strong as of May 31, 2022. Historically, we have had limited defaults and losses on loans in our electric utility loan portfolio largely because of the essential nature of the service provided by electric utility cooperatives as well as other factors, such as limited rate regulation and competition, which we discuss further in the section “Credit Risk—Loan Portfolio Credit Risk.” In addition, we generally lend to members on a senior secured basis, which reduces the risk of loss in the event of a borrower default. Loans outstanding to electric utility organizations of $29,584 million and $27,995 million as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, represented approximately 98% and 99% of total loans outstanding as of each respective date. Of our total loans outstanding, 93% were secured as of both May 31, 2022 and 2021.

We had loans to three borrowers totaling $228 million classified as nonperforming as of May 31, 2022. In comparison we had loans to four borrowers totaling $237 million classified as nonperforming as of May 31, 2021. Nonperforming loans represented 0.76% and 0.84% of total loans outstanding as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The reduction in nonperforming loans of $9 million during fiscal year 2022 was due in part to our receipt during fiscal year 2022 of full payment of all amounts due on nonperforming loans to two RTFC borrowers totaling $9 million. In addition, we have


30


continued to receive payments on the remaining outstanding nonperforming loan to a CFC electric power supply borrower, including payments totaling $29 million during fiscal year 2022, which reduced the balance of this loan to $114 million as of May 31, 2022, from $143 million as of May 31, 2021. These reductions were partially offset by the classification during the fiscal quarter ended May 31, 2022 (the “fourth quarter of fiscal year 2022”) of the $28 million loan outstanding to Brazos Sandy Creek Electric Cooperative Inc. (“Brazos Sandy Creek”) as nonperforming following its bankruptcy filing, as discussed below.

Loans outstanding to Brazos, which filed for bankruptcy in March 2021 due to its exposure to elevated wholesale electric power costs during the February 2021 polar vortex, accounted for $86 million and $85 million of our total nonperforming loans as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Brazos is not permitted to make scheduled loan payments without approval of the bankruptcy court. As a result, we have not received payments from Brazos since March 2021, and its loans outstanding to us were delinquent as of each respective date.

On March 18, 2022, Brazos Sandy Creek, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Brazos and a CFC Texas-based electric power supply borrower, filed for bankruptcy following the filing of a motion by Brazos to reject its power purchase agreement with Brazos Sandy Creek as part of Brazos’ bankruptcy proceedings. A Chapter 7 Trustee has been appointed, and the Chapter 7 Trustee was approved by the bankruptcy court to operate Brazos Sandy Creek as a going concern. CFC had a secured loan outstanding to Brazos Sandy Creek totaling $28 million as of May 31, 2022, which, upon notification of the bankruptcy filing by Brazos Sandy Creek, we classified as nonperforming during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2022. Brazos Sandy Creek’s loan outstanding of $28 million was delinquent as of May 31, 2022 and on nonaccrual status as of this date. Aggregate loans outstanding to Brazos and Brazos Sandy Creek totaled $114 million as of May 31, 2022, of which $49 million were secured and $65 million were unsecured. Prior to Brazos’ and Brazos Sandy Creek’s bankruptcy filings in March 2021 and March 2022, respectively, we had not experienced any defaults or charge-offs in our electric utility and telecommunications loan portfolios since fiscal years 2013 and 2017, respectively.

Our allowance for credit losses and allowance coverage ratio decreased to $68 million and 0.22%, respectively, as of May 31, 2022, from $86 million and 0.30%, respectively, as of May 31, 2021. The decrease in the allowance for credit losses of $18 million reflected a decrease in the collective and asset-specific allowance of $14 million and $4 million, respectively. The collective allowance decrease of $14 million was attributable to an improvement in Rayburn’s credit risk profile following Rayburn’s successful completion of a securitization transaction in February 2022 and subsequent payment in full of its obligations to ERCOT and a significant reduction in loans outstanding to Rayburn, as discussed above. The asset-specific allowance decrease of $4 million stemmed from the combined impact of the elimination of an asset-specific allowance attributable to nonperforming loans totaling $9 million that were paid in full during the second quarter of fiscal year 2022 and the decrease of an asset-specific allowance for a nonperforming CFC power supply borrower, attributable to loan payments received on this loan, partially offset by the addition of an asset-specific allowance for Brazos Sandy Creek due to its bankruptcy filing, as discussed above.

As a result of Rayburn’s payment in full of its February 2021 polar vortex-related outstanding obligations to ERCOT, we believe our exposure to the significant adverse financial impact on some electric utilities from the surge in wholesale power costs in Texas during the February 2021 polar vortex is now limited to loans outstanding to Brazos and its wholly-owned subsidiary Brazos Sandy Creek.

We discuss our methodology for estimating the allowance for credit losses in “Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” of this Report. We also provide additional information on the credit quality of our loan portfolio and the allowance for credit losses below in the sections “Critical Accounting Estimates” and “Credit Risk—Allowance for Credit Losses” and “Note 4—Loans” and “Note 5—Allowance for Credit Losses” of this Report.

Financing Activity

We issue debt primarily to fund growth in our loan portfolio. As such, our debt outstanding generally increases and decreases in response to member loan demand. Total debt outstanding increased $1,321 million, or 5%, to $28,747 million as of May 31, 2022, due to borrowings to fund the increase in loans to members. Outstanding dealer commercial paper of $1,025 million as of May 31, 2022 was within our quarter-end target range. Our goal is to maintain dealer commercial paper balance at each quarter-end within a range of $1,000 million and $1,500 million. We provide additional information on our financing activities during fiscal year 2022 in the below in section “Consolidated Balance Sheet Analysis—Debt” of this Report.


31


On December 13, 2021, S&P affirmed CFC’s credit ratings and stable outlook under its revised criteria and updated methodology for rating financial institutions published on December 9, 2021. On December 16, 2021, Moody’s affirmed CFC’s credit ratings and stable outlook. On February 4, 2022, Fitch issued a credit ratings report review of CFC in which Fitch affirmed CFC’s credit ratings and stable outlook. Table 31 presents our credit ratings for each CFC debt product type as of May 31, 2022, which remain unchanged as of the date of this Report, in the below section “Liquidity Risk—Credit Ratings” of this Report.

Liquidity

Our primary sources of funds include member loan principal repayments, securities held in our investment portfolio, committed bank revolving lines of credit, committed loan facilities under the Guaranteed Underwriter Program, revolving note purchase agreements with Farmer Mac and proceeds from debt issuances to our members and in the public capital markets. Although as a non-bank financial institution we are not subject to regulatory liquidity requirements, we monitor our liquidity and funding positions on an ongoing basis and assess our ability to meet our scheduled debt obligations and other cash flow requirements based on point-in-time metrics as well as forward-looking projections. Our liquidity and funding assessment takes into consideration amounts available under existing liquidity sources, the expected rollover of member short-term investments and scheduled loan principal repayment amounts, as well as our continued ability to access the private placement and public capital markets.

As of May 31, 2022, our available liquidity totaled $6,797 million, consisting of (i) cash and cash equivalents of $154 million; (ii) investments in debt securities with an aggregate fair value of $566 million, which is subject to changes based on market fluctuations; (iii) up to $2,597 million available under committed bank revolving line of credit agreements; (iv) up to $1,075 million available under committed loan facilities under the Guaranteed Underwriter Program; and (v) up to $2,405 million available under a revolving note purchase agreement with Farmer Mac, subject to market conditions. In addition to our existing available liquidity of $6,797 million as of May 31, 2022, we expect to receive $1,479 million from scheduled long-term loan principal payments over the next 12 months.

Debt scheduled to mature over the next 12 months totaled $6,894 million as of May 31, 2022, consisting of short-term borrowings of $4,981 million and long-term and subordinated debt of $1,913 million. The short-term borrowings scheduled maturity amount of $4,981 million consists of member investments of $3,956 million and dealer commercial paper of $1,025 million. The long-term and subordinated scheduled debt obligations over the next 12 months of $1,913 million consist of debt maturities and scheduled debt payment amounts.

Our available liquidity of $6,797 million as of May 31, 2022, was $97 million below our total scheduled debt obligations over the next 12 months of $6,894 million. We believe we can continue to roll over our member short-term investments of $3,956 million as of May 31, 2022, based on our expectation that our members will continue to reinvest their excess cash in short-term investment products offered by CFC. Our members historically have maintained a relatively stable level of short-term investments in CFC in the form of commercial paper, select notes, daily liquidity fund notes and medium-term notes. Member short-term investments in CFC have averaged $3,584 million over the last 12 fiscal quarter-end reporting periods. In addition, we expect to receive $1,479 million from scheduled long-term loan principal payments over the next 12 months. Our available liquidity of $6,797 million as of May 31, 2022 was $3,859 million in excess of, or 2.3 times, our total scheduled debt obligations, excluding member short-term investments, over the next 12 months of $2,938 million.

We expect to continue accessing the dealer commercial paper market as a cost-effective means of satisfying our incremental short-term liquidity needs. Although the intra-period amount of dealer commercial paper outstanding may fluctuate based on our liquidity requirements, our intent is to manage our short-term wholesale funding risk by maintaining dealer commercial paper outstanding at each quarter-end within a range of $1,000 million and $1,500 million. Maintaining our committed bank revolving line of credit agreements and continuing to be in compliance with the covenants of these agreements serve to mitigate our rollover risk, as we can draw on these facilities, if necessary, to repay dealer or member commercial paper that cannot be refinanced with similar debt. In addition, under master repurchase agreements we have with counterparties, we can obtain short-term funding in secured borrowing transactions by selling investment-grade corporate debt securities from our investment securities portfolio subject to an obligation to repurchase the same or similar securities at an agreed-upon price and date.



32


The issuance of long-term debt, which represents the most significant component of our funding, allows us to reduce our reliance on short-term borrowings, as well as effectively manage our refinancing and interest rate risk. We expect to continue to issue debt in the private placement and public capital markets to meet our funding needs and believe that we have sufficient sources of liquidity to meet our debt obligations and support our operations over the next 12 months.

We provide additional information on our liquidity profile and our primary sources and uses of funds, including projected amounts, by quarter, over each of the next six fiscal quarters through the quarter ending November 30, 2023, in the below section “Liquidity Risk” of this Report.

COVID-19

We believe that the COVID-19 pandemic has not adversely affected our primary objective of providing our members with the credit products they need to fund their operations and that we have been able to successfully navigate the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic to date. Our electric utility cooperative borrowers operate in a sector identified by the U.S. government as one of the 16 critical infrastructure sectors because the nature of the services provided in these sectors is considered essential and vital in supporting and maintaining the overall functioning of the U.S. economy. Historically, the utility sector in which our electric utility borrowers operate has been resilient to economic downturns. To date, we believe that the pandemic has not had a significant negative impact on the overall financial performance of our members. We also believe that the overall credit quality of our loan portfolio has not been adversely affected by market, economic and other disruptions caused by the pandemic, as we have not experienced any delinquencies in scheduled loan payments or received requests for payment deferrals from our borrowers due to the pandemic.

CFC has been able to maintain business continuity throughout the pandemic and has experienced no pandemic-related employee furloughs or layoffs. We have remote-work options available for most employees while also providing for in- person collaboration at our headquarters in Loudoun County, Virginia, as we believe this working model allows CFC to provide the highest quality of service and deliver more effectively on our member-focused mission. Effective March 2, 2022, we lifted our mask requirement at CFC’s headquarters for vaccinated employees based on the CDC’s updated guidance and the COVID-19 Community Level low classification for Loudoun County at that time. We plan to continue to monitor and update our practices in response to changes in the COVID-19 workplace safety and health standards established by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”) and Virginia as they relate to Loudoun County and guidance provided by the CDC.

Although most health and safety restrictions in response to COVID-19 have been lifted, we cannot predict the potential future impact that the COVID-19 pandemic may have on our operations and financial performance, or the specific ways the pandemic may uniquely impact our members. We provide additional information on actions taken in response to the pandemic to protect the safety and health of our employees under “Item 1. Business—Human Capital Management” in this Report. We discuss the potential adverse impact of natural disasters, including weather-related events such as the February 2021 polar vortex, and widespread health emergencies, such as COVID-19, on our business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity under “Item 1A. Risk Factors—Operations and Business Risks” in this Report.

Electric Cooperative Industry Trends and Developments

We believe there are emerging developments and trends in the electric cooperative sector that may present opportunities as well as challenges for our electric cooperative members. These trends include (i) expanded investments by some electric cooperatives to deploy broadband services to their members; (ii) inflation and supply chain disruptions; (iii) an increased focus on enhancing electric system resiliency and reliability; (iv) evolving relationships between some electric cooperative power supply systems and electric cooperative distribution systems to increase investments in renewable power supply; and (v) growing support of beneficial electrification strategies to reduce overall carbon emissions, while also providing benefits to cooperative members.

Expanded Investments to Deploy Broadband Services

Many rural electric distribution cooperatives have made or are making infrastructure investments that include building fiber optic lines to improve electric grid system reliability, efficiency and cost savings, as fiber operations offers enhanced communication to monitor electric systems, identify outages and speed electric restoration. Some of these electric


33


cooperatives are leveraging these fiber assets to offer access to broadband services, either directly or by partnering with local telecommunication companies and others, to the communities they serve. We are currently aware of 185 broadband projects by different CFC member cooperatives, and we financed or are financing 112 of these 185 broadband projects. Capital expenditures for the completion of these 185 broadband projects are expected to total approximately $9,632 million. We believe that the capital expenditures for the completion of the broadband projects that we financed or are financing will total approximately $3,985 million. Our aggregate loans outstanding to CFC electric distribution cooperative members relating to broadband projects, which we started tracking in October 2017, increased to an estimated $1,647 million as of May 31, 2022, from approximately $854 million as of May 31, 2021. The three states with the largest CFC loans outstanding for broadband projects were Oklahoma, Indiana and Arkansas as of May 31, 2022, and broadband loans outstanding for these states totaled $205 million, $191 million and $155 million, respectively, as of this date. Many of these broadband projects are also financially supported by various states and the federal government, which reduces the credit risk for CFC and the investment risk for our electric cooperative members. We expect our member electric cooperatives to continue in their efforts to expand broadband access to unserved and underserved communities.

Inflation and Supply Chain Disruptions

Many rural electric cooperatives are experiencing increasing cost in power supply, labor and materials. Power supply cost for many cooperatives is increasingly volatile based on natural gas and coal market pricing. For example, according to the Economic News Release from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics published on July 13, 2022, the index for natural gas increased 38.4% over the last 12 months, the largest increase since the period ending October 2005. In addition to increasing material cost, supply chain disruptions have extended delivery times for utility hardware and are causing project timelines to be extended as well. Labor cost and competition for employees has increased for some cooperatives due to labor shortages.

Increased Focus on Enhancing Electric System Resiliency and Reliability

We have observed an increase in capital investments by electric cooperatives to proactively strengthen existing electric systems as well as replace systems in the aftermath of damages from recent weather-related incidents, including hurricanes and winter storms. We believe that the adverse impact on electric systems from weather-related incidents and wildfires has resulted in a heightened awareness by electric cooperatives of the need to focus attention on making infrastructure upgrades to improve both the resiliency and reliability of electric systems.

Evolving Cooperative Focus on Clean Energy Supply Investments

We also have observed that many electric power supply and electric distribution cooperatives are increasingly focused on efforts to identify potential opportunities to increase investments in renewable power supply and storage. This includes both on-balance sheet construction of renewable generation and off-balance sheet acquisition of renewable power through power purchase agreements. According to the NRECA, electric cooperatives more than tripled their renewable capacity from 3.9 gigawatts to more than 13 gigawatts from 2010 to 2021, including adding 1.4 gigawatts of renewable capacity in 2021 alone.

Growing Support for Beneficial Electrification

Rural electric cooperatives have become increasingly supportive of beneficial electrification, which refers to the replacement of fossil-fuel powered systems with electrical ones in a way that reduces overall emissions, while providing benefits to the environment and to households. The increased support among electric cooperatives reflects an expectation that beneficial electrification will result in increased sales, while also saving money for members and reducing carbon emission.

We believe the above trends and current investment priorities of our electric cooperative members will require reliable, affordable sources of funding and may result in a steady demand for capital from CFC.

Outlook

As further described below in the “Liquidity Risk—Projected Near-Term Sources and Uses of Funds” section, we currently anticipate net long-term loan growth of $1,150 million over the next 12 months. On March 16, 2022, the Federal Open


34


Market Committee (“FOMC”) of the Federal Reserve raised the target range for the federal funds rate by 0.25% to a range of 0.25% to 0.50%, the first rate increase since December 2018. The FOMC further raised the target range for the federal funds rate at each of its meetings held in May, June and July 2022, with the federal funds rate reaching a target range of 2.25% to 2.50%. The FOMC also signaled an expectation of ongoing increases in the federal funds rate at each of its remaining three meetings in 2022, and pointed to a consensus target rate of 3.40% by December 31, 2022, an increase from its March 2022 estimated target rate of 1.90%, due to an increase in inflation projections. The yield curve has flattened throughout 2022, was briefly inverted in late March 2022 and again in June and July 2022. The consensus market outlook for interest rates as of the second half of June 2022 pointed to rising interest rates across the yield curve, with the yield curve remaining flat or inverted over the remainder of 2022. Based on this yield curve forecast, we anticipate a decrease in our reported net interest income, reported net interest yield and adjusted net interest yield over the next 12 months relative to the prior 12-month period ended May 31, 2022. However, we expect a slight increase in our adjusted net interest income over the next 12 months relative to the prior 12-month period ended May 31, 2022, due to an anticipated reduction in our derivative net periodic cash settlements expense as short-term interest rates rise.

We anticipate a slight decrease in our adjusted net income and adjusted TIER over the next 12 months. While our goal is to maintain an adjusted debt-to-equity ratio of approximately 6.00-to-1, we expect that our adjusted debt-to-equity ratio will remain near the current level due to the anticipated loan growth. As discussed above, we are subject to earnings volatility, often significant, because we do not apply hedge accounting to our interest rate swaps. Therefore, the periodic unrealized fluctuations in the fair value of our interest rate swaps are recorded in our earnings. The variances in our earnings between periods are generally attributable to significant shifts in recorded unrealized derivative forward value gain and loss amounts. We exclude the impact of unrealized derivative forward fair value gains and losses from our non-GAAP adjusted measures.

We are unable to provide a reconciliation of our projected adjusted net income, adjusted TIER and adjusted debt-to-equity ratio to the most directly comparable GAAP measures or directional guidance for the most directly comparable GAAP measures on a forward-looking basis without unreasonable effort due to the significant shifts in the unrealized derivative forward value gains and losses recorded each period. The majority of our swaps are long-term, with an average remaining life of approximately 15 years as of May 31, 2022. We can reasonably estimate the realized net periodic derivative cash settlement amounts over the next 12 months for our interest rate swaps, which are typically based on the 3-month LIBOR and the fixed rate of the swap. In contrast, the unrealized periodic derivative forward value gains and losses are largely based on future expected changes in longer-term interest rates, which we are unable to accurately predict for each reporting period over the next 12 months. Because unrealized periodic derivative forward value gain and loss amounts are a key driver of changes in our earnings between periods, this unavailable information is likely to have a significant impact on our reported net income, TIER and debt-to-equity ratio, which represent the most directly comparable GAAP measures. We provide reconciliations of our non-GAAP adjusted net income, adjusted TIER and adjusted debt-to-equity ratio to the most directly comparable GAAP measures for each reporting period included in this Report in the section “Non-GAAP Financial Measures.” These reconciliations illustrate the potential significant impact that unrealized derivative forward value gains and losses could have on our future reported net income, reported TIER and reported adjusted debt-to-equity ratio.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make a number of judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets, liabilities, income and expenses in our consolidated financial statements. Understanding our accounting policies and the extent to which we use management’s judgment and estimates in applying these policies is integral to understanding our financial statements. We provide a discussion of our significant accounting policies in “Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.”

Certain accounting estimates are considered critical because they involve significant judgments and assumptions about highly complex and inherently uncertain matters, and the use of reasonably different estimates and assumptions could have a material impact on our results of operations or financial condition. The determination of the allowance for expected credit losses over the remaining expected life of the loans in our loan portfolio involves a significant degree of management judgment and level of estimation uncertainty. As such, we have identified our accounting policy governing the estimation of the allowance for credit losses as a critical accounting estimate. Management established policies and control procedures intended to ensure that the methodology used for determining our allowance for credit losses, including any judgments and assumptions made as part of such method, are well-controlled and applied consistently from period to period. We evaluate


35


our critical accounting estimates and judgments required by our policies on an ongoing basis and update them as necessary based on changing conditions. We describe our allowance methodology and process for estimating the allowance for credit losses under “Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies—Allowance for Credit Losses—Loan Portfolio—Current Methodology.”

Upon our adoption of CECL on June 1, 2020, we are required to maintain an allowance based on a current estimate of credit losses that are expected to occur over the remaining life of the loans in our portfolio. The methods utilized to estimate the allowance for credit losses, key assumptions and quantitative and qualitative information considered by management in determining the appropriate allowance for credit losses is discussed in “Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.”

Key inputs, such as our historical loss data and third-party default data, that we use in determining the appropriate allowance for credit losses are more readily quantifiable, while other inputs, such as our internally assigned borrower risk ratings that are intended to assess a borrower’s capacity to meet its financial obligations and provide information on the probability of default, require more qualitative judgment. Degrees of imprecision exist in each of these inputs due in part to subjective judgments involved and an inherent lag in the data available to quantify current conditions and events that may affect our credit loss estimate.

Our internally assigned borrower risk ratings serve as the primary credit quality indicator for our loan portfolio. We perform an annual comprehensive review of each of our borrowers, following the receipt of the borrower’s annual audited financial statements, to reassess the borrower’s risk rating. In addition, interim risk-rating adjustments may occur as a result of updated information affecting a borrower’s ability to fulfill its obligations or other significant developments and trends. Our Credit Risk Management Group and Corporate Credit Committee review and provide rigorous oversight and governance around our internally assigned risk ratings to ensure the ratings process is consistent. In addition, we engage third-party credit risk management experts to conduct an independent annual review of our risk rating system to validate its overall integrity. This review involves an evaluation of the accuracy and timeliness of individual risk ratings and the overall effectiveness of our risk-rating framework relative to the risk profile of our credit exposures. While we have a robust risk-rating process, changes in our borrower risk ratings may not always directly coincide with changes in the risk profile of an individual borrower due to the timing of the rating process and a potential lag in the receipt of information necessary to evaluate the impact of emerging developments and current conditions on the risk ratings of our borrower. Although our allowance for credit losses is sensitive to each key input, shifts in the credit risk ratings of our borrowers generally have the most notable impact on our allowance for credit losses.

Allowance for Credit Losses

Our allowance for credit losses and allowance coverage ratio decreased to $68 million and 0.22%, respectively, as of May 31, 2022, from $86 million and 0.30%, respectively, as of May 31, 2021. The decrease in the allowance for credit losses of $18 million reflected a decrease in the collective and asset-specific allowance of $14 million and $4 million, respectively. We discuss the methodology used to estimate the allowance for credit losses in “Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.”

Key Assumptions

Determining the appropriateness of the allowance for credit losses is subject to numerous estimates and assumptions requiring significant management judgment about matters that involve a high degree of subjectivity and are difficult to predict. The key assumptions in determining our collective allowance that require significant management judgment and may have a material impact on the amount of the allowance include the segmentation of our loan portfolio; our internally assigned borrower risk ratings; the probability of default; the loss severity or recovery rate in the event of default for each portfolio segment; and management’s consideration of qualitative factors that may cause estimated credit losses associated with our existing loan portfolio to differ from our historical loss experience.

As discussed below in “Credit Risk—Loan Portfolio Credit Risk,” CFC has experienced only 18 defaults in its 53-year history, and prior to Brazos and Brazos Sandy Creek we had no defaults in our electric utility loan portfolio since fiscal year 2013. As such, we have a limited history of defaults to develop reasonable and supportable estimated probability of default rates for our existing loan portfolio. We therefore utilize third-party default data for the utility sector as a proxy to estimate


36


probability of default rates for our loan portfolio segments. However, we utilize our internal historical loss experience to estimate loss given default, or the recovery rate, for each of our loan portfolio segments. We believe our internal historical loss experience serves as a more reliable estimate of loss severity than third-party data due to the organizational structure and operating environment of rural utility cooperatives, our lending practice of generally requiring a senior security position on the assets and revenue of borrowers for long-term loans, the approach we take in working with borrowers that may be experiencing operational or financial issues and other factors discussed in “Credit Risk—Loan Portfolio Credit Risk.”

We generally consider nonperforming loans as well as loans that have been or are anticipated to be modified under a troubled debt restructuring for individual evaluation given the risk characteristics of such loans and establish an asset-specific allowance for these loans. The key assumptions in determining our asset-specific allowance that require significant management judgment and may have a material impact on the amount of the allowance include measuring the amount and timing of future cash flows for individually evaluated loans that are not collateral-dependent and estimating the value of the underlying collateral for individually evaluated loans that are collateral-dependent.

The degree to which any particular assumption affects the allowance for credit losses depends on the severity of the change and its relationship to the other assumptions. We regularly evaluate the key inputs and assumptions used in determining the allowance for credit losses and update them, as necessary, to better reflect present conditions, including current trends in credit performance and borrower risk profile, portfolio concentration risk, changes in risk-management practices, changes in the regulatory environment and other factors relevant to our loan portfolio segments. We did not change our allowance methodology or nature of the underlying key inputs used and assumptions used in measuring our allowance for credit losses during fiscal year 2022.

Sensitivity Analysis

As noted above, our allowance for credit losses is sensitive to a variety of factors. While management uses its best judgment to assess loss data and other factors to determine the allowance for credit losses, changes in our loss assumptions, adjustments to assigned borrower risk ratings, the use of alternate external data sources or other factors could affect our estimate of probable credit losses inherent in the portfolio as of each balance sheet date, which would also impact the related provision for credit losses recognized in our consolidated statements of operations. For example, changes in the inputs below, without taking into consideration the impact of other potential offsetting or correlated inputs, would have the following effect on our allowance of credit losses as of May 31, 2022.

A 10% increase or decrease in the default rates for all of our portfolio segments would result in a corresponding increase or decrease of approximately $3 million.
A 1% increase or decrease in the recovery rates for all of our portfolio segments would result in a corresponding decrease or increase of approximately $9 million.
A one-notch downgrade in the internal borrower risk ratings for our entire loan portfolio would result in an increase of approximately $13 million, while a one-notch upgrade would result in a decrease of approximately $14 million.

These sensitivity analyses are intended to provide an indication of the isolated impact of hypothetical alternative assumptions on our allowance for credit losses. Because management evaluates a variety of factors and inputs in determining the allowance for credit losses, these sensitivity analyses are not considered probable and do not imply an expectation of future changes in loss rates or borrower risk ratings. Given current processes employed in estimating the allowance for credit losses, management believes the inherent loss rates and currently assigned risk ratings are appropriate. It is possible that others performing the analyses, given the same information, may at any point in time reach different reasonable conclusions that could be significant to our consolidated financial statements.

We discuss the risks and uncertainties related to management’s judgments and estimates in applying accounting policies that have been identified as a critical accounting estimates under “Item 1A. Risk Factors—Regulatory and Compliance Risks” in this Report. We provide additional information on the allowance for credit losses under the below section “Credit Risk—Allowance for Credit Losses” and “Note 5—Allowance for Credit Losses” in this Report.



37


RECENT ACCOUNTING CHANGES AND OTHER DEVELOPMENTS

Recent Accounting Changes

We provide information on recently adopted accounting standards and the adoption impact on CFC’s consolidated financial statements and recently issued accounting standards not yet required to be adopted and the expected adoption impact in “Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.” To the extent we believe the adoption of new accounting standards has had or will have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations, financial condition or liquidity, we discuss the impact in the applicable section(s) of this MD&A.

CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This section provides a comparative discussion of our consolidated results of operations between fiscal years 2022 and 2021. Following this section, we provide a discussion and analysis of material changes in amounts reported on our consolidated balance sheet as of May 31, 2022 and amounts reported as of May 31, 2021. You should read these sections together with our “Executive Summary—Outlook” where we discuss trends and other factors that we expect will affect our future results of operations. See “Item 7. MD&A—Consolidated Results of Operations” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021 (“2021 Form 10-K”) for a comparative discussion of our consolidated results of operations between fiscal year 2021 and the fiscal year ended May 31, 2020 (“fiscal year 2020”).

Net Interest Income

Net interest income, which is our largest source of revenue, represents the difference between the interest income earned on our interest-earning assets and the interest expense on our interest-bearing liabilities. Our net interest yield represents the difference between the yield on our interest-earning assets and the cost of our interest-bearing liabilities plus the impact of non-interest bearing funding. We expect net interest income and our net interest yield to fluctuate based on changes in interest rates and changes in the amount and composition of our interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. We do not fund each individual loan with specific debt. Rather, we attempt to minimize costs and maximize efficiency by proportionately funding large aggregated amounts of loans.

Table 2 presents average balances for fiscal years 2022, 2021 and 2020, and for each major category of our interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, the interest income earned or interest expense incurred, and the average yield or cost. Table 2 also presents non-GAAP adjusted interest expense, adjusted net interest income and adjusted net interest yield, which reflect the inclusion of net accrued periodic derivative cash settlements expense in interest expense. We provide reconciliations of our non-GAAP adjusted measures to the most comparable U.S. GAAP measures under “Non-GAAP Financial Measures.”



38


Table 2: Average Balances, Interest Income/Interest Expense and Average Yield/Cost
Year Ended May 31,
(Dollars in thousands)202220212020
Assets:Average BalanceInterest Income/ExpenseAverage Yield/CostAverage BalanceInterest Income/ExpenseAverage Yield/CostAverage BalanceInterest Income/ExpenseAverage Yield/Cost
Long-term fixed-rate loans(1)
$25,974,724 $1,062,223 4.09 %$24,978,267 $1,051,524 4.21 %$23,890,577 $1,043,918 4.37 %
Long-term variable-rate loans749,131 16,895 2.26 645,819 14,976 2.32 891,541 31,293 3.51 
Line of credit loans2,148,197 46,887 2.18 1,626,092 35,596 2.19 1,718,364 55,140 3.21 
Troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”) loans9,528 735 7.71 10,328 790 7.65 11,238 836 7.44 
Nonperforming loans227,795   185,554 — — 5,957 — — 
Other, net(2)
 (1,448) — (1,381)— — (1,304)— 
Total loans29,109,375 1,125,292 3.87 27,446,060 1,101,505 4.01 26,517,677 1,129,883 4.26 
Cash, time deposits and investment securities762,489 15,951 2.09 796,566 15,096 1.90 866,013 21,403 2.47 
Total interest-earning assets$29,871,864 $1,141,243 3.82 %$28,242,626 $1,116,601 3.95 %$27,383,690 $1,151,286 4.20 %
Other assets, less allowance for credit losses(3)
466,329 537,506 551,378 
Total assets(3)
$30,338,193 $28,780,132 $27,935,068 
Liabilities:
Commercial paper$2,565,629 $11,086 0.43 %$2,189,558 $8,330 0.38 %$2,318,112 $45,713 1.97 %
Other short-term borrowings2,006,020 7,179 0.36 2,148,767 6,400 0.30 1,795,351 32,282 1.80 
Short-term borrowings(4)
4,571,649 18,265 0.40 4,338,325 14,730 0.34 4,113,463 77,995 1.90 
Medium-term notes4,854,421 108,769 2.24 3,904,603 113,582 2.91 3,551,973 125,954 3.55 
Collateral trust bonds7,050,468 248,413 3.52 6,938,534 249,248 3.59 7,185,910 257,396 3.58 
Guaranteed Underwriter Program notes payable6,165,206 169,166 2.74 6,146,410 167,403 2.72 5,581,854 162,929 2.92 
Farmer Mac notes payable3,059,946 55,245 1.81 2,844,252 50,818 1.79 2,986,469 87,617 2.93 
Other notes payable6,774 155 2.29 10,246 241 2.35 17,586 671 3.82 
Subordinated deferrable debt986,407 51,541 5.23 986,209 51,551 5.23 986,035 51,527 5.23 
Subordinated certificates1,245,120 53,980 4.34 1,270,385 54,490 4.29 1,349,454 57,000 4.22 
Total interest-bearing liabilities$27,939,991 $705,534 2.53 %$26,438,964 $702,063 2.66 %$25,772,744 $821,089 3.19 %
Other liabilities(3)
897,751 1,380,414 1,141,884 
Total liabilities(3)
28,837,742 27,819,378 26,914,628 
Total equity(3)
1,500,451 960,754 1,020,440 
Total liabilities and equity(3)
$30,338,193 $28,780,132 $27,935,068 
Net interest spread(5)
1.29 %1.29 %1.01 %
Impact of non-interest bearing funding(6)
0.17 0.18 0.20 
Net interest income/net interest yield(7)
$435,709 1.46 %$414,538 1.47 %$330,197 1.21 %
Adjusted net interest income/adjusted net interest yield:
Interest income$1,141,243 3.82 %$1,116,601 3.95 %$1,151,286 4.20 %
Interest expense705,534 2.53 702,063 2.66 821,089 3.19 
Add: Net periodic derivative cash settlements interest expense(8)
101,385 1.21 115,645 1.28 55,873 0.55 
Adjusted interest expense/adjusted average cost(9)
$806,919 2.89 %$817,708 3.09 %$876,962 3.40 %
Adjusted net interest spread(7)
0.93 %0.86 %0.80 %
Impact of non-interest bearing funding(6)
0.19 0.20 0.20 
Adjusted net interest income/adjusted net interest yield(10)
$334,324 1.12 %$298,893 1.06 %$274,324 1.00 %



39


____________________________
(1)Interest income on long-term, fixed-rate loans includes loan conversion fees, which are generally deferred and recognized as interest income using the effective interest method.
(2)Consists of late payment fees and net amortization of deferred loan fees and loan origination costs.
(3)The average balance represents average monthly balances, which is calculated based on the month-end balance as of the beginning of the reporting period and the balances as of the end of each month included in the specified reporting period.
(4)Short-term borrowings reported on our consolidated balance sheets consist of borrowings with an original contractual maturity of one year or less. However, short-term borrowings presented in Table 2 consist of commercial paper, select notes, daily liquidity fund notes and secured borrowings under repurchase agreements. Short-term borrowings presented on our consolidated balance sheets related to medium-term notes, Farmer Mac notes payable and other notes payable are reported in the respective category for presentation purposes in Table 2. The period-end amounts reported as short-term borrowings on our consolidated balances sheets, which are excluded from the calculation of average short-term borrowings presented in Table 2, totaled $417 million, $363 million, and $537 million as of May 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
(5)Net interest spread represents the difference between the average yield on total average interest-earning assets and the average cost of total average interest-bearing liabilities. Adjusted net interest spread represents the difference between the average yield on total average interest-earning assets and the adjusted average cost of total average interest-bearing liabilities.
(6)Includes other liabilities and equity.
(7)Net interest yield is calculated based on net interest income for the period divided by total average interest-earning assets for the period.
(8)Represents the impact of net periodic contractual interest amounts on our interest rate swaps during the period. This amount is added to interest expense to derive non-GAAP adjusted interest expense. The average (benefit)/cost associated with derivatives is calculated based on net periodic swap settlement interest amount during the period divided by the average outstanding notional amount of derivatives during the period. The average outstanding notional amount of interest rate swaps was $8,406 million, $9,062 million and $10,180 million for fiscal years 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
(9)Adjusted interest expense consists of interest expense plus net periodic derivative cash settlements interest expense during the period. Net periodic derivative cash settlement interest amounts are reported on our consolidated statements of operations as a component of derivative gains (losses). Adjusted average cost is calculated based on adjusted interest expense for the period divided by total average interest-bearing liabilities during the period.
(10)Adjusted net interest yield is calculated based on adjusted net interest income for the period divided by total average interest-earning assets for the period.

Table 3 displays the change in net interest income between periods and the extent to which the variance for each category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities is attributable to (i) changes in volume, which represents the change in the average balances of our interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities or volume, and (ii) changes in the rate, which represents the change in the average interest rates of these assets and liabilities. The table also presents the change in adjusted net interest income between periods.


40


Table 3: Rate/Volume Analysis of Changes in Interest Income/Interest Expense
 2022 versus 20212021 versus 2020
 Total
Variance Due To:(1)
Total
Variance Due To:(1)
(Dollars in thousands)VarianceVolumeRateVarianceVolumeRate
Interest income:      
Long-term fixed-rate loans$10,699 $41,948 $(31,249)$7,606 $47,527 $(39,921)
Long-term variable-rate loans1,919 2,396 (477)(16,317)(8,625)(7,692)
Line of credit loans11,291 11,429 (138)(19,544)(2,961)(16,583)
TDR loans(55)(61)6 (46)(68)22 
Other, net(67) (67)(77)— (77)
Total loans23,787 55,712 (31,925)(28,378)35,873 (64,251)
Cash, time deposits and investment securities855 (646)1,501 (6,307)(1,716)(4,591)
Total interest income$24,642 $55,066 $(30,424)$(34,685)$34,157 $(68,842)
Interest expense:    
Commercial paper$2,756 $1,431 $1,325 $(37,383)$(2,535)$(34,848)
Other short-term borrowings779 (425)1,204 (25,882)6,355 (32,237)
Short-term borrowings3,535 1,006 2,529 (63,265)3,820 (67,085)
Medium-term notes(4,813)27,629 (32,442)(12,372)12,504 (24,876)
Collateral trust bonds(835)4,021 (4,856)(8,148)(8,861)713 
Guaranteed Underwriter Program notes payable1,763 512 1,251 4,474 16,479 (12,005)
Farmer Mac notes payable4,427 3,854 573 (36,799)(4,172)(32,627)
Other notes payable(86)(82)(4)(430)(280)(150)
Subordinated deferrable debt(10)10 (20)24 15 
Subordinated certificates(510)(1,084)574 (2,510)(3,340)830 
Total interest expense3,471 35,866 (32,395)(119,026)16,159 (135,185)
Net interest income$21,171 $19,200 $1,971 $84,341 $17,998 $66,343 
Adjusted net interest income:
Interest income$24,642 $55,066 $(30,424)$(34,685)$34,157 $(68,842)
Interest expense3,471 35,866 (32,395)(119,026)16,159 (135,185)
Net periodic derivative cash settlements interest expense(2)
(14,260)(8,367)(5,893)59,772 (6,137)65,909 
Adjusted interest expense(3)
(10,789)27,499 (38,288)(59,254)10,022 (69,276)
Adjusted net interest income$35,431 $27,567 $7,864 $24,569 $24,135 $434 
____________________________
(1)The changes for each category of interest income and interest expense represent changes in either average balances (volume) or average rates for both interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. We allocate the amount attributable to the combined impact of volume and rate to the rate variance.
(2)For the net periodic derivative cash settlements interest amount, the variance due to average volume represents the change in the net periodic derivative cash settlements interest expense amount resulting from the change in the average notional amount of derivative contracts outstanding. The variance due to average rate represents the change in the net periodic derivative cash settlements amount resulting from the net difference between the average rate paid and the average rate received for interest rate swaps during the period.
(3) See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” for additional information on our adjusted non-GAAP measures.





41


Reported Net Interest Income

Reported net interest income of $436 million for fiscal year 2022 increased $21 million, or 5%, from fiscal year 2021, driven by an increase in average interest-earning assets of $1,629 million, or 6%, partially offset by a decrease in the net interest yield of 1% (1 basis point) to 1.46%.

Average Interest-Earning Assets: The increase in average interest-earning assets of 6% during fiscal year 2022 was primarily attributable to growth in average total loans of $1,663 million, or 6%, from fiscal year 2021, driven by an increase in average long-term fixed-rate loans of $996 million and an increase in average line of credit loans of $522 million. The continued low interest rate environment presented an opportunity for members to obtain long-term loan advances to fund capital investments at a low fixed rate of interest. The increase in average line of credit loans was mainly attributable to loan advances to one distribution member that experienced an adverse financial impact from restoration costs incurred to repair damage caused by two successive hurricanes and loan advances to several CFC Texas-based power supply borrowers that were subject to elevated power costs during the February 2021 polar vortex.

Net Interest Yield: The increase in the net interest yield of 1 basis point, or 1%, was primarily attributable to the combined impact of a decrease in the average yield on interest-earning assets of 13 basis points to 3.82% and a reduction in the benefit from non-interest bearing funding of 1 basis point to 0.17%, which were largely offset by a reduction in our average cost of borrowings of 13 basis points to 2.53%. The decreases in the average yield on interest-earning assets and our average cost of borrowings reflected the impact of the continued low interest rate environment during fiscal year 2022.

Adjusted Net Interest Income

Adjusted net interest income of $334 million for fiscal year 2022 increased $35 million, or 12%, from fiscal year 2021, driven by the combined impact of an increase in average interest-earning assets of $1,629 million, or 6%, and an increase in the adjusted net interest yield of 6 basis points, or 6%, to 1.12%.

Average Interest-Earning Assets: The increase in average interest-earning assets of 6% was driven by the growth in average total loans of $1,663 million, or 6%, from fiscal year 2021, primarily attributable to an increase in average long-term fixed-rate and line of credit loans as discussed above.

Adjusted Net Interest Yield: The increase in the adjusted net interest yield of 6 basis points, or 6%, reflected the favorable impact of a reduction in our adjusted average cost of borrowings of 20 basis points to 2.89%, which was partially offset by a decrease in the average yield on interest-earning assets of 13 basis points to 3.82%, both of which were attributable to the lower interest rate environment during fiscal year 2022.

We include the net periodic derivative cash settlements interest expense amounts on our interest rate swaps in the calculation of our adjusted average cost of borrowings, which, as a result, also impacts the calculation of adjusted net interest income and adjusted net interest yield. We recorded net periodic derivative cash settlements interest expense of $101 million for fiscal year 2022, compared with $116 million and $56 million for fiscal years 2021 and 2020.

The floating-rate payments on our interest rate swaps are typically based on 3-month LIBOR. Because our derivative portfolio consists of a higher proportion of pay-fixed swaps than receive-fixed swaps, the net periodic derivative cash settlements interest expense amounts generally change based on changes in the floating interest amount received each period. When the 3-month LIBOR rate increases during the period, the received floating interest amounts on our pay-fixed swaps increase and, conversely, when the 3-month LIBOR swap rate decreases, the received floating interest amounts on our pay-fixed swaps decrease. The 3-month LIBOR rate began to increase during the second half of fiscal year 2022, resulting in an increase in received floating interest amounts and contributing to lower net periodic derivative cash settlements interest expense amounts in the current fiscal year. In contrast, the 3-month LIBOR rate decreased during fiscal year 2021 resulting in a reduction in received floating interest amounts and contributing to higher net periodic derivative cash settlements interest expense amounts in the prior fiscal year.

See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” for additional information on our adjusted measures, including a reconciliation of these measures to the most comparable U.S. GAAP measures.


42


Provision for Credit Losses

Our provision for credit losses each period is driven by changes in our measurement of lifetime expected credit losses for our loan portfolio recorded in the allowance for credit losses. Our allowance for credit losses and allowance coverage ratio were $68 million and 0.22%, respectively, as of May 31, 2022. In comparison, our allowance for credit losses and allowance coverage ratio were $86 million and 0.30%, respectively, as of May 31, 2021.

We recorded a benefit for credit losses of $18 million for fiscal year 2022. In contrast, we recorded a provision for credit losses of $29 million for fiscal year 2021. The current fiscal year benefit was primarily attributable to a decrease in the collective allowance, stemming largely from positive developments during fiscal year 2022 related to Rayburn that resulted in an improvement in Rayburn’s credit risk profile and also a significant reduction in our loans outstanding to Rayburn. In June 2021, Texas enacted securitization legislation that offers a financing program for qualifying electric cooperatives exposed to elevated power costs during the February 2021 polar vortex. In February 2022, Rayburn successfully completed a securitization transaction pursuant to this legislation to cover extraordinary costs and expenses incurred during the February 2021 polar vortex. Subsequent to the completion of the securitization transaction, Rayburn fully paid its outstanding obligations to ERCOT. As a result, we revised our borrower risk rating for Rayburn to a rating in the pass category from a previous rating in the criticized category. In addition, we received loan payments from Rayburn during fiscal year 2022 that reduced our loans outstanding to Rayburn to $167 million as of May 31, 2022, consisting of secured and unsecured loans outstanding of $151 million and $16 million, respectively. Loans outstanding to Rayburn totaled $379 million as of the prior fiscal year ended May 31, 2021, consisting of secured and unsecured loans outstanding of $167 million and $212 million, respectively.

The provision for credit losses of $29 million recorded for fiscal year 2021 reflected the allowance build due to the significant adverse financial impact on Brazos and Rayburn resulting from their exposure to elevated wholesale electric power supply costs during the February 2021 polar vortex.

We discuss our methodology for estimating the allowance for credit losses in “Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies—Allowance for Credit Losses—Current Methodology.” We also provide additional information on our allowance for credit losses below under section “Credit Risk—Allowance for Credit Losses” and “Note 5—Allowance for Credit Losses” in this Report.

Non-Interest Income

Non-interest income consists of fee and other income, gains and losses on derivatives not accounted for in hedge accounting relationships, and gains and losses on equity and debt investment securities, which consists of both unrealized and realized
gains and losses.

Table 4 presents the components of non-interest income (loss) recorded in our consolidated statements of operations for fiscal years 2022, 2021 and 2020.

Table 4: Non-Interest Income
 Year Ended May 31,
(Dollars in thousands)202220212020
Non-interest income components:
Fee and other income$17,193 $18,929 $22,961 
Derivative gains (losses)456,482 506,301 (790,151)
Investment securities gains (losses)(30,179)1,495 9,431 
Total non-interest income (loss)$443,496 $526,725 $(757,759)

The significant variance in non-interest income between fiscal years was primarily attributable to changes in the derivative gains (losses) recognized in our consolidated statements of operations. In addition, we experienced an unfavorable shift in unrealized investment securities gains of $32 million for the current fiscal year compared with the prior fiscal year. We


43


expect period-to-period market fluctuations in the fair value of our equity and debt investment securities, which we report together with realized gains and losses from the sale of investment securities on our consolidated statements of operations.

Derivative Gains (Losses)

Our derivative instruments are an integral part of our interest rate risk-management strategy. Our principal purpose in using derivatives is to manage our aggregate interest rate risk profile within prescribed risk parameters. The derivative instruments we use primarily include interest rate swaps, which we typically hold to maturity. In addition, we may on occasion use treasury locks to manage the interest rate risk associated with debt that is scheduled to reprice in the future. The primary factors affecting the fair value of our derivatives and derivative gains (losses) recorded in our results of operations include changes in interest rates, the shape of the swap curve and the composition of our derivative portfolio. We generally do not designate our interest rate swaps, which currently account for all our derivatives, for hedge accounting. Accordingly, changes in the fair value of interest rate swaps are reported in our consolidated statements of operations under derivative gains (losses). However, if we execute a treasury lock, we typically designate the treasury lock as a cash flow hedge.

We currently use two types of interest rate swap agreements: (i) we pay a fixed rate of interest and receive a variable rate of interest (“pay-fixed swaps”), and (ii) we pay a variable rate of interest and receive a fixed rate of interest (“receive-fixed swaps”). The interest amounts are based on a specified notional balance, which is used for calculation purposes only. The benchmark variable rate for the substantial majority of the floating-rate payments under our swap agreements is 3-month LIBOR. As interest rates decline, pay-fixed swaps generally decrease in value and result in the recognition of derivative losses, as the amount of interest we pay remains fixed, while the amount of interest we receive declines. In contrast, as interest rates rise, pay-fixed swaps generally increase in value and result in the recognition of derivative gains, as the amount of interest we pay remains fixed, but the amount we receive increases. With a receive-fixed swap, the opposite results occur as interest rates decline or rise. Our derivative portfolio consists of a higher proportion of pay-fixed swaps than receive-fixed swaps; therefore, we generally record derivative losses when interest rates decline and derivative gains when interest rates rise. Because our pay-fixed and receive-fixed swaps are referenced to different maturity terms along the swap curve, different changes in the swap curve—parallel, flattening, inversion or steepening—will also impact the fair value of our derivatives.
On July 20, 2021, we executed two treasury lock agreements with an aggregate notional amount of $250 million to lock in the underlying U.S. Treasury interest rate component of interest rate payments on anticipated debt issuances and repricings. The treasury locks, which were scheduled to mature on October 29, 2021, were designated and qualified as cash flow hedges. In October 2021, we borrowed $250 million under our Farmer Mac revolving note purchase agreement and terminated the treasury locks. Prior to this anticipated borrowing and the termination of the treasury locks, we recorded changes in the fair value of the treasury locks in AOCI. At termination, the treasury locks were in a gain position of $5 million, of which $4 million is being accreted from AOCI to interest expense over the term of the related Farmer Mac borrowings and the remainder was recognized in earnings. We did not have any derivatives designated as accounting hedges as of May 31, 2022 or May 31, 2021.

Table 5 presents the components of net derivative gains (losses) recorded in our consolidated statements of operations for fiscal years 2022, 2021 and 2020. Derivative cash settlements interest expense represents the net periodic contractual interest amount for our interest rate swaps during the reporting period. Derivative forward value gains (losses) represent the change in fair value of our interest rate swaps during the applicable reporting period due to changes in expected future interest rates over the remaining life of our derivative contracts.

Table 5: Derivative Gains (Losses)
Year Ended May 31,
(Dollars in thousands)202220212020
Derivative gains (losses) attributable to:
Derivative cash settlements interest expense$(101,385)$(115,645)$(55,873)
Derivative forward value gains (losses)557,867 621,946 (734,278)
Derivative gains (losses)$456,482 $506,301 $(790,151)



44


We recorded derivative gains of $456 million for fiscal year 2022, attributable to increases in interest rates across the entire swap curve during the period. In contrast, we recorded derivative gains of $506 million for fiscal year 2021, driven by pronounced increases in medium- and longer-term swap rates, namely five-year to 30-year swap rates.

As noted above, the substantial majority of our swap portfolio consists of longer-dated, pay-fixed swaps. Therefore, increases and decreases in medium- and longer-term swap rates generally have a more pronounced corresponding impact on the change in the net fair value of our swap portfolio. We present comparative swap curves, which depict the relationship between swap rates at varying maturities, for our reported periods in Table 7 below.

Derivative Cash Settlements

As indicated in Table 5 above, and discussed above under “Consolidated Results of Operations—Net Interest Income—Adjusted Net Interest Income,” we recorded net periodic derivative cash settlements interest expense of $101 million in fiscal year 2022, compared with $116 million for fiscal year 2021. The 3-month LIBOR rate began to increase during the second half of fiscal year 2022, resulting in an increase in received floating interest amounts and contributing to lower net periodic derivative cash settlements interest expense amounts in the current fiscal year. In contrast, the 3-month LIBOR rate decreased during fiscal year 2021, resulting in a reduction in received floating interest amounts and contributing to higher net periodic derivative cash settlements interest expense amounts in the prior fiscal year.

Table 6 displays, by interest rate swap agreement type, the average notional amount and the weighted-average interest rate paid and received for the net periodic derivative cash settlements interest expense during each respective period. As discussed above, our derivative portfolio consists of a higher proportion of pay-fixed swaps than receive-fixed swaps, with pay-fixed swaps accounting for approximately 75% and 73% of the outstanding notional amount of our derivative portfolio as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

Table 6: Derivatives—Average Notional Amounts and Interest Rates
Year Ended May 31,
 202220212020
AverageWeighted-AverageWeighted-AverageWeighted-
NotionalAverage RateNotionalAverage RateNotionalAverage Rate
(Dollars in thousands)AmountPaidReceivedAmountPaidReceivedAmountPaidReceived
Interest rate swap type:
Pay-fixed swaps$6,145,318 2.61 %0.36 %$6,566,734 2.73 %0.27 %$7,092,961 2.82 %1.91 %
Receive-fixed swaps2,260,663 1.01 2.82 2,494,890 1.03 2.78 3,086,705 2.62 2.64 
Total$8,405,981 2.18 %1.03 %$9,061,624 2.26 %0.96 %$10,179,666 2.76 %2.13 %

The average remaining maturity of our pay-fixed and receive-fixed swaps was 19 years and three years, respectively, as of both May 31, 2022 and 2021.


















45


Comparative Swap Curves

Table 7 below provides comparative swap curves as of May 31, 2022, 2021, 2020 and 2019.

Table 7: Comparative Swap Curves
nru-20220531_g1.jpg____________________________
Benchmark rates obtained from Bloomberg.

See “Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies—Derivative Instruments” and “Note 10—Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” for additional information on our derivative instruments. Also refer to “Note 14—Fair Value Measurement” for information on how we measure the fair value of our derivative instruments.

Non-Interest Expense

Non-interest expense consists of salaries and employee benefit expense, general and administrative expenses, gains and losses on the early extinguishment of debt and other miscellaneous expenses.

Table 8 presents the components of non-interest expense recorded in our consolidated statements of operations in fiscal years 2022, 2021 and 2020.



46


Table 8: Non-Interest Expense
 Year Ended May 31,
(Dollars in thousands)202220212020
Non-interest expense components:
Salaries and employee benefits$(51,863)$(55,258)$(54,522)
Other general and administrative expenses(43,323)(39,447)(46,645)
Operating expenses(95,186)(94,705)(101,167)
Losses on early extinguishment of debt(754)(1,456)(683)
Other non-interest expense(1,552)(1,619)(25,588)
Total non-interest expense$(97,492)$(97,780)$(127,438)

Non-interest expense of $97 million for fiscal year 2022 decreased slightly from fiscal year 2021, as the decrease in salaries and employee benefits and lower losses on the early extinguishment of debt, were largely offset by an increase in other general and administrative expenses as we resumed business travel and in-person corporate meetings and events that were cancelled during the prior fiscal year due to the pandemic.

Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests represents 100% of the results of operations of NCSC and RTFC, as the members of NCSC and RTFC own or control 100% of the interest in their respective companies. The fluctuations in net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests are primarily due to changes in the fair value of NCSC’s derivative instruments recognized in NCSC’s earnings.

We recorded a net income attributable to noncontrolling interests of $3 million for fiscal year 2022. In comparison, we recorded a net income attributable to noncontrolling interests of $2 million for fiscal years 2021 and a net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests of $4 million for fiscal year 2020.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET ANALYSIS

Total assets increased $1,613 million, or 5%, in fiscal year 2022 to $31,251 million as of May 31, 2022, primarily due to growth in our loan portfolio. We experienced an increase in total liabilities of $871 million, or 3%, to $29,109 million as of May 31, 2022, largely due to the issuances of debt to fund the growth in our loan portfolio. Total equity increased $742 million to $2,142 million as of May 31, 2022, attributable to our reported net income of $799 million for the current fiscal year, which was partially offset by the CFC Board of Directors’ authorized patronage capital retirement in July 2021 of $58 million.

Below is a discussion of changes in the major components of our assets and liabilities during fiscal year 2022. Period-end balance sheet amounts may vary from average balance sheet amounts due to liquidity and balance sheet management activities that are intended to manage our liquidity requirements and market risk exposure in accordance with our risk appetite framework.

Loan Portfolio

We segregate our loan portfolio into segments, by legal entity, based on the borrower member class, which consists of CFC distribution, CFC power supply, CFC statewide and associate, NCSC and RTFC. We offer both long-term and line of credit loans to our borrowers. Under our long-term loan facilities, a borrower may select a fixed interest rate or a variable interest rate at the time of each loan advance. Line of credit loans are revolving loan facilities and generally have a variable interest rate. We describe and provide additional information on our member classes under “Item 1. Business—Members” and information about our loan programs and loan product types under “Item 1. Business—Loan and Guarantee Programs” in this Report.




47


Loans Outstanding

Table 9 presents loans outstanding by legal entity, member class and loan product type as of May 31, 2022 and 2021.

Table 9: Loans—Outstanding Amount by Member Class and Loan Type
May 31,
(Dollars in thousands)20222021
Member class:Amount% of TotalAmount% of TotalChange
CFC:    
Distribution$23,844,242 79 %$22,027,423 78 %$1,816,819 
Power supply4,901,770 17 5,154,312 18 (252,542)
Statewide and associate126,863  106,121 — 20,742 
CFC28,872,875 96 27,287,856 96 1,585,019 
NCSC710,878 2 706,868 4,010 
RTFC467,601 2 420,383 47,218 
Total loans outstanding(1)
30,051,354 100 %28,415,107 100 %1,636,247 
Deferred loan origination costs—CFC(2)
12,032 — 11,854 — 178 
Loans to members$30,063,386 100 %$28,426,961 100 %$1,636,425 
Loan type:
Long-term loans:    
Fixed-rate$26,952,372 90 %$25,514,766 90 %$1,437,606 
Variable-rate820,201 2 658,579 161,622 
Total long-term loans27,772,573 92 26,173,345 92 1,599,228 
Line of credit loans2,278,781 8 2,241,762 37,019 
Total loans outstanding(1)
30,051,354 100 %28,415,107 100 %1,636,247 
Deferred loan origination costs—CFC(2)
12,032  11,854 — 178 
Loans to members$30,063,386 100 %$28,426,961 100 %$1,636,425 
____________________________
(1) Represents the unpaid principal balance, net of charge-offs and recoveries, of loans as of the end of each period.
(2)Deferred loan origination costs are recorded on the books of CFC.

Loans to members totaled $30,063 million and $28,427 million as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Loans to CFC distribution and power supply borrowers accounted for 96% of total loans to members as of both May 31, 2022 and 2021, and long-term fixed-rate loans accounted for 90% of loans to members as of both May 31, 2022 and 2021. The increase in loans to members of $1,636 million, or 6%, from May 31, 2021, was attributable to net increases in long-term and line of credit loans of $1,599 million and $37 million, respectively. We experienced increases in CFC distribution loans, CFC statewide and associate loans, NCSC loans and RTFC loans of $1,817 million, $21 million, $4 million and $47 million, respectively, and a decrease in CFC power supply loans of $253 million.

Long-term loan advances totaled $3,386 million during fiscal year 2022, of which approximately 80% was provided to members for capital expenditures and 18% was provided to members for other expenses, primarily to fund operating expenses attributable to the elevated power cost obligations incurred during the February 2021 polar vortex. In comparison, long-term loan advances totaled $2,514 million during fiscal year 2021, of which approximately 86% was provided to members for capital expenditures and 8% was provided for the refinancing of loans made by other lenders. Of the $3,386 million total long-term loans advanced during fiscal year 2022, $2,911 million were fixed-rate loan advances with a weighted average fixed-rate term of 23 years.

Many rural electric distribution cooperatives have made or are making infrastructure investments that include building fiber optic lines to improve electric grid system reliability and efficiency, as fiber operations offers enhanced communication to monitor electric systems, identify outages and speed electric restoration. Some of these electric cooperatives are leveraging


48


these fiber assets to offer access to broadband services, either directly or by partnering with local telecommunication companies and others, to the communities they serve. Aggregate loans outstanding to CFC electric distribution cooperative members relating to broadband projects, which we started tracking in October 2017, increased to an estimated $1,647 million as of May 31, 2022, from approximately $854 million as of May 31, 2021. Many of these broadband projects are also financially supported by various states and the federal government, which reduces the credit risk for CFC and our electric cooperative members. We expect our member electric cooperatives to continue in their efforts to expand broadband access to unserved and underserved communities.

We provide information on the credit performance and risk profile of our loan portfolio below under the section “Credit Risk—Loan Portfolio Credit Risk” in this Report. Also refer to “Item 1. Business—Loan and Guarantee Programs” and “Note 4—Loans” in this Report for addition information on our loans to members.”

Loans—Retention Rate

Long-term fixed-rate loans accounted for 90% as of both May 31, 2022 and 2021 of our loans to members of $30,063 million and $28,427 million, respectively. Borrowers that select a fixed rate on a loan advance under a long-term loan facility have the option of choosing a term on the advance between one year and the final maturity date of the loan. At the expiration of a selected fixed-rate term, or the repricing date, borrowers have the option of: (i) selecting CFC’s current long-term fixed rate for a term ranging from one year up to the full remaining term of the loan; (ii) selecting CFC’s current long-term variable rate; or (iii) repaying the loan in full.

The continued low interest rate environment over the last several years presented an opportunity for our members to obtain new long-term loan advances at a lower fixed-to-maturity interest rate or lock in a lower fixed interest rate to maturity at the repricing date on existing outstanding long-term loan advances. Because many of our members have locked in at or near historic low interest rates on outstanding loan advances for extended terms, the amount of long-term fixed-rate loans that repriced during each fiscal year over the last five fiscal years has gradually decreased, from $987 million in fiscal year 2017 to $379 million in fiscal year 2022. Long-term fixed-rate loans scheduled to reprice over the next 12 months totaled $338 million as of May 31, 2022, and long-term fixed-rate loans scheduled to reprice over the subsequent five fiscal years through the fiscal year ended May 31, 2027 totaled $1,584 million as of May 31, 2022, representing an average of $317 million per fiscal year.

CFC’s long-term fixed-rate loans that repriced in accordance with our standard loan repricing provisions totaled $379 million during fiscal year 2022. Of this total, $361 million, or 95%, was retained and the remaining amount was repaid. The average annual retention rate, calculated based on the election made by the borrower at the repricing date, was 97% for CFC loans that repriced during each of the three fiscal years ended May 31, 2022.

Debt

We utilize both short-term borrowings and long-term debt as part of our funding strategy and asset/liability interest rate risk management. We seek to maintain diversified funding sources, including our members, affiliates, the capital markets and other funding sources, across products, programs and markets to manage funding concentrations and reduce our liquidity or debt rollover risk. Our funding sources include a variety of secured and unsecured debt securities in a wide range of maturities to our members, affiliates, the capital markets and other funding sources.

Debt Product Types

We offer various short- and long-term unsecured debt securities to our members and affiliates, including commercial paper, select notes, daily liquidity fund notes, medium-term notes and subordinated certificates. We also issue commercial paper, medium-term notes and collateral trust bonds in the capital markets. Additionally, we have access to funds under borrowing arrangements with banks, private placements and U.S. government agencies. Table 10 displays our primary funding sources and their selected key attributes.



49


Table 10: Debt—Debt Product Types
Debt Product Type:Maturity RangeMarketSecured/Unsecured
Short-term funding programs:
Commercial paper1 to 270 daysCapital markets, members and affiliatesUnsecured
Select notes30 to 270 daysMembers and affiliatesUnsecured
Daily liquidity fund notesDemand noteMembers and affiliatesUnsecured
Securities sold under repurchase agreements1 to 90 daysCapital marketsSecured
Other funding programs:
Medium-term notes9 months to 30 yearsCapital markets, members and affiliatesUnsecured
Collateral trust bonds(1)
Up to 30 yearsCapital marketsSecured
Guaranteed Underwriter Program notes payable(2)
Up to 30 yearsU.S. governmentSecured
Farmer Mac notes payable(3)
Up to 30 yearsPrivate placementSecured
Other notes payable(4)
Up to 3 yearsPrivate placementBoth
Subordinated deferrable debt(5)
Up to 45 yearsCapital marketsUnsecured
Members’ subordinated certificates(6)
Up to 100 yearsMembersUnsecured
Revolving credit agreementsUp to 5 yearsBank institutionsUnsecured
____________________________
(1)Collateral trust bonds are secured by the pledge of permitted investments and eligible mortgage notes from distribution system borrowers in an amount at least equal to the outstanding principal amount of collateral trust bonds.
(2)Represents notes payable under the Guaranteed Underwriter Program, which supports the Rural Economic Development Loan and Grant program. The Federal Financing Bank provides the financing for these notes, and RUS provides a guarantee of repayment. We are required to pledge eligible mortgage notes from distribution and power supply system borrowers in an amount at least equal to the outstanding principal amount of the notes payable.
(3)We are required to pledge eligible mortgage notes from distribution and power supply system borrowers in an amount at least equal to the outstanding principal amount under note purchase agreements with Farmer Mac.
(4)Other notes payable consist of unsecured and secured Clean Renewable Energy Bonds. We are required to pledge eligible mortgage notes from distribution and power supply system borrowers in an amount at least equal to the outstanding principal amount under the Clean Renewable Energy Bonds Series 2009A note purchase agreement.
(5)Subordinated deferrable debt is subordinate and junior to senior debt and debt obligations we guarantee, but senior to subordinated certificates. We have the right at any time, and from time to time, during the term of the subordinated deferrable debt to suspend interest payments for a maximum period of 20 consecutive quarters for $1,000 par notes, or a maximum period of 40 consecutive quarters for $25 par notes. To date, we have not exercised our option to suspend interest payments. We have the right to call the subordinated deferrable debt, at par, any time after 10 years for $1,000 par notes or 5 years for $25 par notes.
(6)Members’ subordinated certificates consist of membership subordinated certificates, loan and guarantee certificates and member capital securities, and are subordinated and junior to senior debt, subordinated debt and debt obligations we guarantee. Membership subordinated certificates generally mature 100 years subsequent to issuance. Loan and guarantee subordinated certificates have the same maturity as the related long-term loan. Some certificates also may amortize annually based on the outstanding loan balance. Member capital securities mature 30 years subsequent to issuance. Member capital securities are callable at par beginning either five or 10 years subsequent to the issuance and anytime thereafter.

Debt Outstanding

Table 11 displays the composition, by product type, of our outstanding debt and the weighted average interest rate as of May 31, 2022 and 2021. Table 11 also displays the composition of our debt based on several additional selected attributes.












50


Table 11: Total Debt Outstanding and Weighted-Average Interest Rates
May 31,
 20222021
(Dollars in thousands)Outstanding AmountWeighted-
Average
Interest Rate
Outstanding AmountWeighted-
Average
Interest Rate
Change
Debt product type:
Commercial Paper:
Members, at par$1,358,0690.92 %$1,124,6070.14 %$233,462
Dealer, net of discounts1,024,8130.96 894,9770.16 129,836
Total commercial paper2,382,8820.94 2,019,5840.15 363,298
Select notes to members1,753,4411.11 1,539,1500.30 214,291
Daily liquidity fund notes to members427,7900.80 460,5560.08 (32,766)
Securities sold under repurchase agreements 200,1150.30 (200,115)
Medium-term notes:
Members, at par667,4511.43 595,0371.28 72,414
Dealer, net of discounts5,241,6872.20 3,923,3852.31 1,318,302
Total medium-term notes5,909,1382.11 4,518,4222.17 1,390,716
Collateral trust bonds6,848,4903.17 7,191,9443.15 (343,454)
Guaranteed Underwriter Program notes payable6,105,4732.69 6,269,3032.76 (163,830)
Farmer Mac notes payable3,094,6792.33 2,977,9091.68 116,770
Other notes payable4,7141.80 8,2361.68 (3,522)
Subordinated deferrable debt986,5185.11 986,3155.11 203
Members’ subordinated certificates:
Membership subordinated certificates628,6034.95 628,5944.95 9
Loan and guarantee subordinated certificates365,3882.88 386,8962.89 (21,508)
Member capital securities240,1705.00 239,1705.00 1,000
Total members’ subordinated certificates1,234,1614.35 1,254,6604.32 (20,499)
Total debt outstanding$28,747,2862.54 %$27,426,1942.42 %$1,321,092
Security type:
Secured debt56 %61 %
Unsecured debt44 39 
Total100 %100 %
Funding source:
Members19 %18 %
Private placement:
Guaranteed Underwriter Program notes payable21 23 
Farmer Mac notes payable11 11 
Total private placement32 34 
Capital markets49 48 
Total100 %100 %
Interest rate type:
Fixed-rate debt77 %77 %
Variable-rate debt23 23 
Total100 %100 %
Interest rate type including the impact of swaps:
Fixed-rate debt(1)
91 % 93 % 
Variable-rate debt(2)
9   
Total100 %100 %
Maturity classification:(3)
Short-term borrowings17 % 17 % 
Long-term and subordinated debt(4)
83  83  
Total100 %100 %
____________________________


51


(1) Includes variable-rate debt that has been swapped to a fixed rate, net of any fixed-rate debt that has been swapped to a variable rate.
(2) Includes fixed-rate debt that has been swapped to a variable rate, net of any variable-rate debt that has been swapped to a fixed rate. Also includes commercial paper notes, which generally have maturities of less than 90 days. The interest rate on commercial paper notes does not change once the note has been issued; however, the interest rate for new commercial paper issuances changes daily.
(3) Borrowings with an original contractual maturity of one year or less are classified as short-term borrowings. Borrowings with an original contractual maturity of greater than one year are classified as long-term debt.
(4) Consists of long-term debt, subordinated deferrable debt and total members’ subordinated debt reported on our consolidated balance sheets. Maturity classification is based on the original contractual maturity as of the date of issuance of the debt.

We issue debt primarily to fund growth in our loan portfolio. As such, our debt outstanding generally increases and decreases in response to member loan demand. Total debt outstanding increased $1,321 million, or 5%, to $28,747 million as of May 31, 2022, due to borrowings to fund the increase in loans to members. Outstanding dealer commercial paper of $1,025 million as of May 31, 2022 was within our quarter-end target range of $1,000 million and $1,500 million.

Below is a summary of significant financing activities during fiscal year 2022:

On June 7, 2021, we amended the three-year and five-year committed bank revolving line of credit agreements to extend the maturity dates to November 28, 2024 and November 28, 2025, respectively, and to terminate certain bank commitments totaling $70 million under the three-year agreement and $55 million under the five-year agreement. The terminations reduced the total commitment amount under the three-year facility to $1,245 million and the five-year facility to $1,355 million, resulting in an aggregate commitment amount under the two facilities of $2,600 million.
On October 18, 2021, we issued $400 million aggregate principal amount of dealer medium-term notes at a fixed rate of 1.000%, due on October 18, 2024, and $350 million aggregate principal amount of dealer medium-term notes at a variable rate based on SOFR plus 0.33%, due on October 18, 2024.
In October 2021, November 2021, January 2022 and May 2022, we borrowed $250 million, $200 million, $170 million, and $100 million respectively, under the Farmer Mac revolving note purchase agreement.
In November 2021 and February 2022, we borrowed $200 million and $250 million, respectively, under the Guaranteed Underwriter Program.
On November 4, 2021, we closed on a $550 million committed loan facility (“Series S”) under the Guaranteed Underwriter Program. Pursuant to this facility, we may borrow any time before July 15, 2026. Each advance is subject to quarterly amortization and a final maturity not longer than 30 years from the date of the advance.
On November 15, 2021, we early redeemed all $400 million of our 3.05% Collateral Trust Bonds due February 15, 2022.
On February 7, 2022, we issued $600 million aggregate principal amount of dealer medium-term notes at a fixed rate of 1.875%, due on February 7, 2025, and $400 million aggregate principal amount of dealer medium-term notes at a variable rate based on SOFR plus 0.40%, due on August 7, 2023.
On February 7, 2022, we issued $500 million aggregate principal amount of 2.75% Collateral Trust Bonds due April 15, 2032.
On March 25, 2022, we early redeemed all $450 million of our 2.40% of Collateral Trust Bonds due April 25, 2022.
On May 4, 2022, we issued $300 million aggregate principal amount of dealer medium-term notes at a fixed rate of 3.450%, due June 15, 2025.
On May 9, 2022, we issued $100 million aggregate principal amount of dealer medium-term notes at a fixed rate of 3.859%, due June 15, 2029.











52


Member Investments

Debt securities issued to our members represent an important, stable source of funding. Table 12 displays member debt outstanding, by product type, as of May 31, 2022 and 2021.

Table 12: Member Investments
May 31,Change
 20222021
(Dollars in thousands)Amount
% of Total (1)
Amount
% of Total (1)
Member investment product type:
Commercial paper$1,358,06957 %$1,124,60756 %$233,462 
Select notes1,753,441100 1,539,150100 214,291 
Daily liquidity fund notes427,790100 460,556100 (32,766)
Medium-term notes667,45111 595,03713 72,414 
Members’ subordinated certificates1,234,161100 1,254,660100 (20,499)
Total member investments$5,440,912 $4,974,010 $466,902 
Percentage of total debt outstanding19 % 18 %  
____________________________
(1) Represents outstanding debt attributable to members for each debt product type as a percentage of the total outstanding debt for each debt product type.

Member investments accounted for 19% and 18% of total debt outstanding as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Over the last three fiscal years, our member investments have averaged $5,173 million, calculated based on outstanding member investments as of the end of each fiscal quarter during the period.

Short-Term Borrowings

Short-term borrowings consist of borrowings with an original contractual maturity of one year or less and do not include the current portion of long-term debt. Short-term borrowings increased to $4,981 million as of May 31, 2022, from $4,582 million as of May 31, 2021, primarily due to an increase in short-term member investments, and accounted for 17% of total debt outstanding as of each respective date. See “Liquidity Risk” below and “Note 6—Short-Term Borrowings” for information on the composition of our short-term borrowings.

Long-Term and Subordinated Debt

Long-term debt, defined as debt with an original contractual maturity term of greater than one year, primarily consists of medium-term notes, collateral trust bonds, notes payable under the Guaranteed Underwriter Program and notes payable under our Farmer Mac revolving note purchase agreement. Subordinated debt consists of subordinated deferrable debt and members’ subordinated certificates. Our subordinated deferrable debt and members’ subordinated certificates have original contractual maturity terms of greater than one year.

Long-term and subordinated debt of $23,766 million and $22,844 million as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, accounted for 83% of total debt outstanding as of each respective date. We provide additional information on our long-term debt below under the section “Liquidity Risk” and “Note 7—Long-Term Debt” and “Note 8—Subordinated Deferrable Debt” in this Report.









53


Equity

Table 13 presents the components of total CFC equity and total equity as of May 31, 2022 and 2021.

Table 13: Equity
May 31,Change
(Dollars in thousands)20222021
Equity components:
Membership fees and educational fund:
Membership fees$970 $968 $
Educational fund2,417 2,157 260 
Total membership fees and educational fund3,387 3,125 262 
Patronage capital allocated954,988 923,970 31,018 
Members’ capital reserve1,062,286 909,749 152,537 
Total allocated equity2,020,661 1,836,844 183,817 
Unallocated net income (loss):
Prior fiscal year-end cumulative derivative forward value losses(1)
(461,162)(1,079,739)618,577 
Year-to-date derivative forward value gains(1)
553,525 618,577 (65,052)
Period-end cumulative derivative forward value gains (losses)(1)
92,363 (461,162)553,525 
Other unallocated net loss(709)(709)— 
Unallocated net income (loss)91,654 (461,871)553,525 
CFC retained equity2,112,315 1,374,973 737,342 
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)2,258 (25)2,283 
Total CFC equity2,114,573 1,374,948 739,625 
Noncontrolling interests27,396 24,931 2,465 
Total equity$2,141,969 $1,399,879 $742,090 
____________________________
(1)Represents derivative forward value gains (losses) for CFC only, as total CFC equity does not include the noncontrolling interests of the variable interest entities NCSC and RTFC, which we are required to consolidate. We present the consolidated total derivative forward value gains (losses) in Table 37 in the “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” section below. Also, see “Note 16—Business Segments” for the statements of operations for CFC.

The increase in total equity of $742 million to $2,142 million as of May 31, 2022 was attributable to our reported net income of $799 million for fiscal year 2022, partially offset by the CFC Board of Directors’ authorized patronage capital retirement in July 2021 of $58 million.

Allocation and Retirement of Patronage Capital

We are subject to District of Columbia law governing cooperatives, under which CFC is required to make annual allocations of net earnings, if any, in accordance with the provisions of the District of Columbia statutes. District of Columbia cooperative law requires cooperatives to allocate net earnings to patrons, to a general reserve in an amount sufficient to maintain a balance of at least 50% of paid-up capital and to a cooperative educational fund, as well as permits additional allocations to board-approved reserves. District of Columbia cooperative law also requires that a cooperative’s net earnings be allocated to all patrons in proportion to their individual patronage and each patron’s allocation be distributed to the patron unless the patron agrees that the cooperative may retain its share as additional capital. Pursuant to these provisions, the CFC Board of Directors is required to make annual allocations of net earnings, if any. CFC’s net earnings for determining allocations is based on non-GAAP adjusted net income, which excludes the impact of derivative forward value gains (losses). We provide a reconciliation of our adjusted net income to our reported net income and an explanation of the adjustments below in “Non-GAAP Financial Measures.”



54


In May 2022, the CFC Board of Directors authorized the allocation of $1 million of net earnings for fiscal year 2022 to the cooperative educational fund. In July 2022, the CFC Board of Directors authorized the allocation of fiscal year 2022 adjusted net income follows: $89 million to members in the form of patronage capital and $153 million to the members’ capital reserve. In July 2022, the CFC Board of Directors also authorized the retirement of patronage capital totaling $59 million, of which $44 million represented 50% of the patronage capital allocation for fiscal year 2022 and $15 million represented the portion of the allocation from fiscal year 1997 net earnings that has been held for 25 years pursuant to the CFC Board of Directors’ policy. We expect to return the authorized patronage capital retirement amount of $59 million to members in cash in the second quarter of fiscal year 2023. The remaining portion of the patronage capital allocation for fiscal year 2022 will be retained by CFC for 25 years pursuant to the guidelines adopted by the CFC Board of Directors in June 2009.

In May 2021, the CFC Board of Directors authorized the allocation of $1 million of net earnings for fiscal year 2021 to the cooperative educational fund. In July 2021 the CFC Board of Directors authorized the allocation of fiscal year 2021 adjusted net income as follows: $90 million to members in the form of patronage capital and $102 million to the members’ capital reserve. In July 2021, the CFC Board of Directors also authorized the retirement of patronage capital totaling $58 million, of which $45 million represented 50% of the patronage capital allocation for fiscal year 2021 and $13 million represented the portion of the allocation from fiscal year 1996 net earnings that has been held for 25 years pursuant to the CFC Board of Directors’ policy. This amount was returned to members in cash in September 2021. The remaining portion of the patronage capital allocation for fiscal year 2021 will be retained by CFC for 25 years pursuant to the guidelines adopted by the CFC Board of Directors in June 2009.

The CFC Board of Directors is required to make annual allocations of adjusted net income, if any. CFC has made annual retirements of allocated net earnings in 42 of the last 43 fiscal years; however, future retirements of allocated amounts are determined based on CFC’s financial condition. The CFC Board of Directors has the authority to change the current practice for allocating and retiring net earnings at any time, subject to applicable laws.

ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT

Overview

We face a variety of risks that can significantly affect our financial performance, liquidity, reputation and ability to meet the expectations of our members, investors and other stakeholders. As a financial services company, the major categories of risk exposures inherent in our business activities include credit risk, liquidity risk, market risk and operational risk. These risk categories are summarized below.

Credit risk is the risk that a borrower or other counterparty will be unable to meet its obligations in accordance with agreed-upon terms.

Liquidity risk is the risk that we will be unable to fund our operations and meet our contractual obligations or that we will be unable to fund new loans to borrowers at a reasonable cost and tenor in a timely manner.

Market risk is the risk that changes in market variables, such as movements in interest rates, may adversely affect the match between the timing of the contractual maturities, re-pricing and prepayments of our financial assets and the related financial liabilities funding those assets.

Operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal controls, processes, systems, human error or external events, including natural disasters or public health emergencies, such as the current COVID-19 pandemic. Operational risk also includes cybersecurity risk, compliance risk, fiduciary risk, reputational risk and litigation risk.

Effective risk management is critical to our overall operations and to achieving our primary objective of providing cost-based financial products to our rural electric members while maintaining the sound financial results required for investment-grade credit ratings on our rated debt instruments. Accordingly, we have a risk-management framework that is intended to govern the principal risks we face in conducting our business and the aggregate amount of risk we are willing to accept, referred to as risk appetite and risk guidelines, in the context of CFC’s mission and strategic objectives and initiatives.


55


Risk-Management Framework

Our Enterprise Risk Management (“ERM”) framework consists of a defined policy and process for measuring, assessing and responding to key risks in alignment with CFC’s mission and CFC’s Board of Director’s strategic objectives. The board of directors has responsibility for the oversight and strategic direction of the ERM framework and has adopted a comprehensive risk-management policy that describes the roles and responsibilities of the board and management within this framework for identifying and managing risks. In fulfilling its risk-management oversight duties, the board of directors receives periodic reports on business activities and risk-management activities from management. Throughout the year at its periodic meetings, the CFC Board of Directors reviews important trends and emerging developments across key risks as assessed, measured and evaluated by management. The board also establishes CFC’s loan policies and has established a Loan Committee of the board comprising no fewer than 10 directors that reviews the performance of the loan portfolio in accordance with those policies. For additional information about the role of the CFC Board of Directors in risk governance and oversight, see “Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.”

Management is primarily accountable for execution of the ERM responsibilities and daily management of the risks associated with our business. Management executes its responsibility by establishing processes for identifying, measuring, assessing, managing, monitoring and reporting risks. Management also is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal controls to mitigate key risks. We have a number of management-level risk oversight committees across the organization and groups within the organization that have a defined set of authorities and responsibilities specific to one or more risk types, including the Corporate Credit Committee, Asset Liability Committee, Investment Management Committee, and Disclosure Committee. Management provides reports to the board of directors at each regularly scheduled board meeting, and more frequently as requested by the board of directors, relating to, among other things, the ongoing progress of managing risk at CFC given the ERM framework; management’s responses for the critical business risks identified during the risk assessment process and the status of any gaps or deficiencies; and CFC’s risk profile and trends, as well as emerging risks and opportunities.

CREDIT RISK

Our loan portfolio, which represents the largest component of assets on our balance sheet, accounts for the substantial majority of our credit risk exposure. We also engage in certain non-lending activities that may give rise to counterparty credit risk, such as entering into derivative transactions to manage interest rate risk and purchasing investment securities.

Credit Risk Management

We manage credit risk related to our loan portfolio consistent with credit policies established by the CFC Board of Directors and through credit underwriting, approval and monitoring processes and practices adopted by management. Our board-established credit policies include guidelines regarding the types of credit products we offer, limits on credit we extend to individual borrowers, approval authorities delegated to management, and use of syndications and loan sales. We maintain an internal risk rating system in which we assign a rating to each borrower and credit facility. We review and update the risk ratings at least annually. Assigned risk ratings inform our credit approval, borrower monitoring and portfolio review processes. Our Corporate Credit Committee approves individual credit actions within its own authority and together with our Credit Risk Management group, establishes standards for credit underwriting, oversees credits deemed to be higher risk, reviews assigned risk ratings for accuracy, and monitors the overall credit quality and performance statistics of our loan portfolio.

Loan Portfolio Credit Risk

Our primary credit exposure is loans to rural electric cooperatives, which provide essential electric services to end-users, the majority of which are residential customers. We also have a limited portfolio of loans to not-for-profit and for-profit telecommunication companies. As a member-owned finance cooperative, CFC’s principal focus is to provide funding to its rural electric utility cooperative members to assist them in acquiring, constructing and operating electric distribution systems, power supply systems and related facilities. Loans outstanding to electric utility organizations totaled $29,584 million and $27,995 million as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, representing 98% and 99% of total loans outstanding as of each respective date. The remaining loans outstanding in our loan portfolio were to RTFC members,


56


affiliates and associates in the telecommunications industry sector. The substantial majority of loans to our borrowers are long-term fixed-rate loans with terms of up to 35 years. Long-term fixed-rate loans accounted for 90% of total loans outstanding as of both May 31, 2022 and 2021.

Because we lend primarily to our rural electric utility cooperative members, we have had a loan portfolio inherently subject to single-industry and single-obligor credit concentration risk since our inception in 1969. We historically, however, have experienced limited defaults and losses in our electric utility loan portfolio due to several factors. First, the majority of our electric cooperative borrowers operate in states where electric cooperatives are not subject to rate regulation. Thus, they are able to make rate adjustments to pass along increased costs to the end customer without first obtaining state regulatory approval, allowing them to cover operating costs and generate sufficient earnings and cash flows to service their debt obligations. Second, electric cooperatives face limited competition, as they tend to operate in exclusive territories not serviced by public investor-owned utilities. Third, electric cooperatives typically are consumer-owned, not-for-profit entities that provide an essential service to end-users, the majority of which are residential customers. As not-for-profit entities, rural electric cooperatives, unlike investor-owned utilities, generally are eligible to apply for assistance from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (“FEMA”) and states to help recover from major disasters or emergencies. Fourth, electric cooperatives tend to adhere to a conservative core business strategy model that has historically resulted in a relatively stable, resilient operating environment and overall strong financial performance and credit strength for the electric cooperative network. Finally, we generally lend to our members on a senior secured basis, which reduces the risk of loss in the event of a borrower default.

Below we provide information on the credit risk profile of our loan portfolio, including security provisions, credit concentration, credit quality indicators and our allowance for credit losses.

Security Provisions

Except when providing line of credit loans, we generally lend to our members on a senior secured basis. Long-term loans are generally secured on parity with other secured lenders (primarily RUS), if any, by all assets and revenue of the borrower with exceptions typical in utility mortgages. Line of credit loans are generally unsecured. In addition to the collateral pledged to secure our loans, distribution and power supply borrowers also are required to set rates charged to customers to achieve certain specified financial ratios. Table 14 presents, by legal entity and member class and by loan type, secured and unsecured loans in our loan portfolio as of May 31, 2022 and 2021. Of our total loans outstanding, 93% were secured as of both May 31, 2022 and 2021.



57


Table 14: Loans—Loan Portfolio Security Profile
May 31, 2022
(Dollars in thousands)Secured% of TotalUnsecured% of TotalTotal
Member class:
CFC:
Distribution$22,405,486 94 %$1,438,756 6 %$23,844,242 
Power supply4,455,098 91 446,6729 4,901,770 
Statewide and associate83,759 66 43,10434 126,863 
Total CFC26,944,343 93 1,928,532 7 28,872,875 
NCSC689,887 97 20,991 3 710,878 
RTFC454,985 97 12,616 3 467,601 
Total loans outstanding(1)
$28,089,215 93 $1,962,139 7 $30,051,354 
Loan type:
Long-term loans:
Fixed-rate$26,731,763 99 %$220,609 1 %$26,952,372 
Variable-rate817,866 100 2,335  820,201 
Total long-term loans27,549,629 99 222,944 1 27,772,573 
Line of credit loans539,586 24 1,739,195 76 2,278,781 
Total loans outstanding(1)
$28,089,215 93 $1,962,139 7 $30,051,354 
May 31, 2021
(Dollars in thousands)Secured% of TotalUnsecured% of TotalTotal
Member class:
CFC:
Distribution$20,702,657 94 %$1,324,766 %$22,027,423 
Power supply4,458,311 86 696,00114 5,154,312 
Statewide and associate88,004 83 18,11717 106,121 
Total CFC25,248,972 93 2,038,884 27,287,856 
NCSC662,782 94 44,086 706,868 
RTFC399,717 95 20,666 420,383 
Total loans outstanding(1)
$26,311,471 93 $2,103,636 $28,415,107 
Loan type:
Long-term loans:
Fixed-rate$25,278,805 99 %$235,961 %$25,514,766 
Variable-rate655,675 100 2,904 — 658,579 
Total long-term loans25,934,480 99 238,865 26,173,345 
Line of credit loans376,991 17 1,864,771 83 2,241,762 
Total loans outstanding(1)
$26,311,471 93 $2,103,636 $28,415,107 
____________________________
(1)Represents the unpaid principal balance, net of charge-offs and recoveries of loans as of the end of each period. Excludes unamortized deferred loan origination costs of $12 million as of both May 31, 2022 and 2021.








58


Credit Concentration

Concentrations of credit may exist when a lender has large credit exposures to single borrowers, large credit exposures to borrowers in the same industry sector or engaged in similar activities or large credit exposures to borrowers in a geographic region that would cause the borrowers to be similarly impacted by economic or other conditions in the region. As discussed above under “Credit Risk—Loan Portfolio Credit Risk,” because we lend primarily to our rural electric utility cooperative members, our loan portfolio is inherently subject to single-industry and single-obligor credit concentration risk, and loans outstanding to electric utility organizations totaled $29,584 million and $27,995 million as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, representing 98% and 99% of our total loans outstanding of each respective date.

Single-Obligor Concentration

Table 15 displays the outstanding loan exposure for our 20 largest borrowers, by legal entity and member class, as of May 31, 2022 and 2021. Our 20 largest borrowers consisted of 12 distribution systems and eight power supply systems as of May 31, 2022. In comparison, our 20 largest borrowers consisted of 10 distribution systems and 10 power supply systems as of May 31, 2021. The largest total exposure to a single borrower or controlled group represented less than 2% of total loans outstanding as of both May 31, 2022 and 2021.

Table 15: Loans—Loan Exposure to 20 Largest Borrowers
May 31,
  20222021
(Dollars in thousands)Amount% of TotalAmount% of Total
Member class:  
CFC:
Distribution$3,929,160 13 %$3,312,571 12 %
Power supply2,095,640 7 2,665,771 
Total CFC6,024,800 20 5,978,342 21 
NCSC195,001 1 203,392 
Total loan exposure to 20 largest borrowers6,219,801 21 6,181,734 22 
Less: Loans covered under Farmer Mac standby purchase commitment(316,367)(1)(308,580)(1)
Net loan exposure to 20 largest borrowers$5,903,434 20 %$5,873,154 21 %

As part of our strategy in managing credit exposure to large borrowers, we entered into a long-term standby purchase commitment agreement with Farmer Mac during fiscal year 2016. Under this agreement, we may designate certain long-term loans to be covered under the commitment, subject to approval by Farmer Mac, and in the event any such loan later goes into payment default for at least 90 days, upon request by us, Farmer Mac must purchase such loan at par value. The aggregate unpaid principal balance of designated and Farmer Mac-approved loans was $493 million and $512 million as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Loan exposure to our 20 largest borrowers covered under the Farmer Mac agreement totaled $316 million and $309 million as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, which reduced our exposure to the 20 largest borrowers to 20% and 21% as of each respective date. No loans have been put to Farmer Mac for purchase pursuant to this agreement. Our credit exposure is also mitigated by long-term loans guaranteed by RUS, which totaled $131 million and $139 million as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

Geographic Concentration

Although our organizational structure and mission results in single-industry concentration, we serve a geographically diverse group of electric and telecommunications borrowers throughout the U.S. The consolidated number of borrowers with loans outstanding totaled 883 and 892 as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, located in 49 states and the District of Columbia. Of the 883 and 892 borrowers with loans outstanding as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, 49 were electric power supply borrowers as of each respective date. Electric power supply borrowers generally require significantly more capital than electric distribution and telecommunications borrowers.



59


Texas, which had 68 and 67 borrowers with loans outstanding as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, accounted for the largest number of borrowers with loans outstanding in any one state as of each respective date, as well as the largest concentration of loan exposure in any one state. Loans outstanding to Texas-based electric utility organizations totaled $5,104 million and $4,878 million as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, and accounted for approximately 17% of total loans outstanding as of each respective date. Of the loans outstanding to Texas-based electric utility organizations, $163 million and $172 million as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, were covered by the Farmer Mac standby repurchase agreement, which reduced our credit risk exposure to Texas-based borrowers to 16% of total loans outstanding as of each respective date. Of the 49 electric power supply borrowers with loans outstanding as of May 31, 2022, eight were located in Texas.

Table 16 provides a breakdown, by state or U.S. territory, of the total number of borrowers with loans outstanding as of May 31, 2022 and 2021 and the outstanding loan exposure to borrowers in each jurisdiction as a percentage of total loans outstanding of $30,051 million and $28,415 million as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.




60


Table 16: Loans—Loan Geographic Concentration
May 31,
 20222021
U.S. State/TerritoryNumber of Borrowers% of Total Loans
Outstanding
Number of
Borrowers
% of Total Loans
Outstanding
Alabama212.37 %242.28 %
Alaska163.29 163.48 
Arizona110.95 110.80 
Arkansas212.42 202.21 
California40.12 40.12 
Colorado275.53 275.70 
Delaware30.26 30.31 
District of Columbia10.10 — — 
Florida193.65 183.84 
Georgia455.33 455.42 
Hawaii20.32 20.36 
Idaho100.41 110.40 
Illinois323.23 313.22 
Indiana403.67 393.21 
Iowa352.31 342.32 
Kansas283.78 294.13 
Kentucky232.47 232.65 
Louisiana82.49 91.95 
Maine30.07 30.08 
Maryland21.48 21.56 
Massachusetts10.20 10.21 
Michigan111.70 111.32 
Minnesota462.16 482.38 
Mississippi211.86 201.58 
Missouri445.65 465.65 
Montana230.80 250.77 
Nebraska90.10 120.10 
Nevada80.82 80.80 
New Hampshire20.36 20.30 
New Jersey20.07 20.06 
New Mexico120.17 130.20 
New York130.42 130.43 
North Carolina262.85 283.08 
North Dakota162.83 142.90 
Ohio272.10 272.18 
Oklahoma253.18 273.40 
Oregon191.24 191.27 
Pennsylvania151.75 161.78 
Rhode Island10.03 10.02 
South Carolina232.80 242.77 
South Dakota290.67 290.64 
Tennessee170.78 160.71 
Texas6817.01 6717.17 
Utah40.78 40.92 
Vermont50.16 50.18 
Virginia171.38 171.08 
Washington101.02 101.12 
West Virginia20.03 20.04 
Wisconsin241.79 231.82 
Wyoming121.04 111.08 
Total883 100.00 %892 100.00 %




61


Credit Quality Indicators

Assessing the overall credit quality of our loan portfolio and measuring our credit risk is an ongoing process that involves tracking payment status, troubled debt restructurings, nonperforming loans, charge-offs, the internal risk ratings of our borrowers troubled debt restructurings, nonperforming and impaired loans, charge-offs and other indicators of credit risk. We monitor and subject each borrower and loan facility in our loan portfolio to an individual risk assessment based on quantitative and qualitative factors. InternalPayment status trends and internal risk ratings and payment status trends are indicators, among others, of the probability of borrower default and leveloverall credit quality of credit risk in our loan portfolio.

The We believe the overall credit quality of our loan portfolio remained high, as evidenced by our strong asset performance metrics, including low levels of criticized exposure. As displayed in Table 21 above, 92% and 93% of our total outstanding loans were secured as of May 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. We had no delinquent or nonperforming loans as of May 31, 2019 and 2018. In addition, we had no loan defaults or charge-offs during the year ended May 31, 2019.2022.

Borrower Risk Ratings

Our borrower risk ratings are intended to align with banking regulatory agency credit risk rating definitions of pass and criticized classifications, with loans classified as criticized further classified as special mention, substandard or doubtful. Pass ratings reflect relatively low probability of default, while criticized ratings have a higher probability of default. Loans with borrowers classified as criticized totaled $202 million, or 0.78%, of total loans outstanding as of May 31, 2019. Of this amount, $176 million was classified as substandard. In comparison, loans with borrowers classified as criticized totaled $178 million, or 0.71%, of total loans outstanding as of May 31, 2018. Of this amount, $171 million was classified as

substandard. We did not have any loans classified as doubtful as of May 31, 2019 or 2018. See “Note 4—Loans” for a description of each of the risk rating classifications.


Troubled Debt Restructurings


We actively monitor problem loans and, from time to time, attempt to work with borrowers to manage such exposures through loan workouts or modifications that better align with the borrower’s current ability to pay. A loan restructuring or modification of terms is accounted for as a TDRtroubled debt restructuring (“TDR”) if, for economic or legal reasons related to the borrower’s financial difficulties, a concession is granted to the borrower that we would not otherwise consider. TDR loans generally are initially classified as nonperforming and placed on nonaccrual status, although in many cases such loans were already on nonaccrual statusclassified as nonperforming prior to modification. Interest accrued but not collected at the date a loan is placed on nonaccrual status is reversed against earnings. These loans may be returned to performing status and the accrual of interest resumed if the borrower performs under the modified terms for an extended period of time, and we expect the borrower to continue to perform in accordance with the modified terms. In certain limited circumstances in which a TDR loan is current at the modification date, the loan may remain on accrual status at the time of modification.


We have not had any loan modifications that were required to be accounted for as TDRs since fiscal year 2016. Table 2417 presents the carrying valueoutstanding amount of modified loans modifiedaccounted for as TDRs in prior periods, by member class, and the performance status of these loans as of May 31, 2022 and 2021.
Table 17: Loans—Troubled Debt Restructured Loans
May 31,
20222021
(Dollars in thousands)Number of Borrowers
Outstanding Amount(1)
% of Total Loans OutstandingNumber of Borrowers
Outstanding Amount(1)
% of Total Loans Outstanding
TDR loans:
CFC—Distribution1$5,092 0.02 %1$5,379 0.02 %
RTFC14,092 0.01 14,592 0.02 
Total TDR loans2$9,184 0.03 %2$9,971 0.04 %
Performance status of TDR loans:
Performing TDR loans2$9,184 0.03 %2$9,971 0.04 %
Total TDR loans2$9,184 0.03 %2$9,971 0.04 %
____________________________
(1) Represents the unpaid principal balance net of charge-offs and recoveries as of the end of each period.

We had TDR loans outstanding to two borrowers totaling $9 million and $10 million as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, consisting of loan modifications to a CFC electric distribution borrower and an RTFC telecommunications borrower, which at the time of the last five fiscal years. Our last modification, were experiencing financial difficulty. Since the modification date, the loans have been performing in accordance with the terms of atheir respective restructured loan that met the definitionagreement for an extended period of atime and were classified as performing and on accrual status as of May 31, 2022 and 2021. We did not have any TDR occurred in fiscal year 2017.loans classified as nonperforming as of May 31, 2022 or May 31, 2021. Although TDR loans may be returned to performing status if the borrower performs under the modified terms of the loan for an extended period of time, we evaluate TDR loans are considered individually impaired.on an individual basis in measuring expected credit losses for these loans.


Table 24: Troubled Debt Restructured Loans




62

  May 31,
  2019 2018 2017 2016 2015
(Dollars in thousands) Carrying Amount % of Total Loans Carrying Amount % of Total Loans Carrying Amount % of Total Loans Carrying Amount % of Total Loans Carrying Amount % of Total Loans
TDR loans:                    
CFC $6,261
 0.03% $6,507
 0.03% $6,581
 0.02% $6,716
 0.03% $7,221
 0.03%
NCSC 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 294
 
RTFC 5,592
 0.02
 6,092
 0.02
 6,592
 0.03
 10,598
 0.04
 4,221
 0.02
Total TDR loans $11,853
 0.05% $12,599
 0.05% $13,173
 0.05% $17,314
 0.07% $11,736
 0.05%
                     
Performance status of TDR loans:                    
Performing TDR loans $11,853
 0.05% $12,599
 0.05% $13,173
 0.05% $13,808
 0.06% $11,736
 0.05%
Nonperforming TDR loans 
 
 
 
 
 
 3,506
 0.01
 
 
Total TDR loans $11,853
 0.05% $12,599
 0.05% $13,173
 0.05% $17,314
 0.07% $11,736
 0.05%


As indicated in Table 24 above, we did not have any TDR loans classified as nonperforming as of May 31, 2019 or 2018.

Nonperforming Loans


In addition to TDR loans that may be classified as nonperforming, we also may have nonperforming loans that have not been modified as a TDR loan.TDR. We classify such loans as nonperforming at the earlier of the date when we determine: (i) interest or principal payments on the loan is past due 90 days or more; (ii) as a result of court proceedings, the collection of interest or principal payments based on the original contractual terms is not expected; or (iii) the full and timely collection of interest or principal is otherwise uncertain. Once a loan is classified as nonperforming, we generally place the loan on nonaccrual status. Interest accrued but not collected at the date a loan is placed on nonaccrual status is reversed against earnings. Table 18 presents the outstanding balance of nonperforming loans, by member class, as of May 31, 2022 and 2021.

Table 18: Loans—Nonperforming Loans
May 31,
 20222021
(Dollars in thousands)Number of Borrowers
Outstanding Amount (1)
% of Total Loans OutstandingNumber of Borrowers
Outstanding Amount (1)
% of Total Loans Outstanding
Nonperforming loans:  
CFC—Power supply(2)
3$227,790 0.76 %2$228,312 0.81 %
RTFC—   29,185 0.03 
Total nonperforming loans3$227,790 0.76 %4$237,497 0.84 %
____________________________
(1) Represents the unpaid principal balance net of charge-offs and recoveries as of the end of each period.
(2) In addition, we had less than $1 million in letters of credit outstanding to Brazos as of May 31, 2021.

We have not had any loans to three borrowers totaling $228 million classified as nonperforming other than TDRas of May 31, 2022. In comparison, we had loans sinceto four borrowers totaling $237 million classified as nonperforming as of May 31, 2021. Nonperforming loans represented 0.76% and 0.84% of total loans outstanding as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The reduction in nonperforming loans of $9 million during the current fiscal year ended
was due in part to our receipt of full payment of all amounts due on nonperforming loans to two RTFC borrowers totaling $9 million during the second quarter of fiscal year 2022. In addition, we have continued to receive payments on the remaining outstanding nonperforming loan to a CFC electric power supply borrower, including payments of $29 million during the current fiscal year, which reduced the balance of this loan to $114 million as of May 31, 2014.2022, from $143 million as of May 31, 2021. These reductions were partially offset by the classification during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2022 of the $28 million loan outstanding to Brazos Sandy Creek as nonperforming following its bankruptcy filing, as discussed below.


Loans outstanding to Brazos, which filed for bankruptcy in March 2021 due to its exposure to elevated wholesale electric power costs during the February 2021 polar vortex, accounted for $86 million and $85 million of our total nonperforming loans as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Brazos is not permitted to make scheduled loan payments without approval of the bankruptcy court. As a result, we have not received payments from Brazos since March 2021, and its loans outstanding were delinquent as of each respective date.

On March 18, 2022, Brazos Sandy Creek, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Brazos and a CFC Texas-based electric power supply borrower, filed for bankruptcy following the filing of a motion by Brazos to reject its power purchase agreement with Brazos Sandy Creek as part of Brazos’ bankruptcy proceedings. A Chapter 7 Trustee has been appointed, and the Chapter 7 Trustee has been approved by the bankruptcy court to operate Brazos Sandy Creek as a going concern. CFC had a secured loan outstanding to Brazos Sandy Creek totaling $28 million as of May 31, 2022, which, upon notification of the bankruptcy filing by Brazos Sandy Creek, was classified as nonperforming during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2022. Brazos Sandy Creek’s loan outstanding of $28 million was delinquent as of May 31, 2022 and on nonaccrual status as of this date. Aggregate loans outstanding to Brazos and Brazos Sandy Creek totaled $114 million as of May 31, 2022, of which $49 million were secured and $65 million were unsecured.

Net Charge-Offs


Charge-offs represent the amount of a loan that has been removed from our consolidated balance sheet when the loan is deemed uncollectible. Generally the amount of a charge-off is the recorded investment in excess of the fair value of the


63


expected cash flows from the loan, or, if the loan is collateral dependent, the fair value of the underlying collateral securing the loan. We report charge-offs net of amounts recovered on previously charged off loans. Table 25 presents charge-offs, net of recoveries, and the net charge-off rate for each of the last five fiscal years.

Table 25: Net Charge-Offs (Recoveries)
  Year Ended May 31,
(Dollars in thousands) 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015
Charge-offs:          
RTFC $
 $
 $2,119
 $
 $999
Recoveries:          
CFC 
 
 (159) (214) (214)
RTFC 
 
 (100) 
 
Total recoveries 
 
 (259) (214) (214)
Net charge-offs (recoveries) $
 $
 $1,860
 $(214) $785
           
Average total loans outstanding $25,527,172
 $24,911,559
 $23,834,432
 $22,490,847
 $20,821,944
           
Net charge-off rate(1)
 0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00 %
0.00%
____________________________
(1)Calculated based on annualized net charge-offs (recoveries) for the period divided by average total outstanding loans for the period.

We had no loan defaults or charge-offs during fiscal years 20192022, 2021 or 2018. The gross charge-offs of $3 million over the last five fiscal years were all attributable2020. Prior to our RTFC telecommunications loan portfolio. We now haveBrazos’ and Brazos Sandy Creek’s bankruptcy filings, we had not experienced an extended period of six consecutive fiscal years for which we have had noany defaults or charge-offs in our electric utility and telecommunications loan portfolio.portfolios since fiscal year 2013 and 2017, respectively.

Historical Loan Losses


In its 50-yearour 53-year history, CFC haswe have experienced only 18 defaults in our electric utility loan portfolio, which includes our most recent defaults by Brazos and Brazos Sandy Creek due to their bankruptcy filing in March 2021 and March 2022, respectively. Of the 16 defaults of which 10prior to Brazos and Brazos Sandy Creek, one remains unresolved with an expected ultimate resolution date in calendar year 2025, nine resulted in no loss and six resulted in cumulative historical net charge-offs of $86 million for our electric utility loan portfolio.million. Of this amount, $67 million was attributable to five electric utility power supply cooperatives and $19 million was attributable to one electric distribution cooperatives.cooperative. We discusscite the reasons loansfactors that have historically contributed to the relatively low risk of default by our electric utility cooperatives, our principal lending market, typically have a relatively low risk of default above under “Credit Concentration.Risk—Loan Portfolio Credit Risk.


In comparison, since RTFC’s inception in 1987, we have hadexperienced 15 defaults and cumulative net charge-offs attributable to telecommunication borrowers totalingof $427 million in our telecommunications loan portfolio, the most significant of which was a charge-off of $354 million in fiscal year 2011. This charge-off related to outstanding loans to Innovative Communications Corporation (“ICC”), a former RTFC member, and the transfer of ICC’s assets in foreclosure to Caribbean Asset Holdings, LLC.


Outstanding loans to electric utility organizations totaled $25,561 million and accounted for 99%Borrower Risk Ratings

As part of our total outstandingmanagement of credit risk, we maintain a credit risk rating framework under which we employ a consistent process for assessing the credit quality of our loan portfolio. We evaluate each borrower and loan facility in our loan portfolio and assign internal borrower and loan facility risk ratings based on consideration of a number of quantitative and qualitative factors. We categorize loans in our portfolio based on our internally assigned borrower risk ratings, which are intended to assess the general creditworthiness of the borrower and probability of default. Our borrower risk ratings align with the U.S. federal banking regulatory agencies’ credit risk definitions of pass and criticized categories, with the criticized category further segmented among special mention, substandard and doubtful. Pass ratings reflect relatively low probability of default, while criticized ratings have a higher probability of default. Our internally assigned borrower risk ratings serve as the primary credit quality indicator for our loan portfolio. Because our internal borrower risk ratings provide important information on the probability of default, they are a key input in determining our allowance for credit losses.

We use our internal risk ratings to measure the credit risk of each borrower and loan facility, identify or confirm problem or potential problem loans in a timely manner, differentiate risk within each of our portfolio segments, assess the overall credit quality of our loan portfolio and manage overall risk levels. Our internally assigned borrower risk ratings, which we map to equivalent credit ratings by external credit rating agencies, serve as the primary credit quality indicator for our loan portfolio. Because our internal borrower risk ratings provide important information on the probability of default, they are a key input in estimating our allowance for credit losses.

Criticized loans decreased by $392 million to $494 million as of May 31, 2019, while outstanding RTFC telecommunications loans totaled $3452022, from $886 million and accounted for 1%, of our total outstanding loan portfolio as of May 31, 2019.2021, representing approximately 2% and 3% of total loans outstanding as of each respective date. The decrease in criticized loans was primarily attributable to positive developments during the third quarter of fiscal year 2022 related to Rayburn that resulted in an improvement in Rayburn’s credit risk profile and also a significant reduction in loans outstanding to Rayburn. Loans outstanding to Rayburn totaled $167 million as of May 31, 2022, and Rayburn’s borrower risk rating was in the pass category. In comparison, loans outstanding to Rayburn totaled $379 million as of May 31, 2021, and Rayburn’s borrower risk rating was in the criticized category.


In February 2022, Rayburn successfully completed a securitization transaction to cover extraordinary costs and expenses incurred during the February 2021 polar vortex pursuant to a financing program enacted into law by Texas in June 2021 for qualifying electric cooperatives exposed to elevated power costs during the February 2021 polar vortex. Subsequent to the completion of the securitization transaction, Rayburn fully paid its outstanding obligations to ERCOT. As a result, we revised our borrower risk rating for Rayburn to a rating in the pass category from a previous rating in the criticized category. In addition, we received loan payments from Rayburn during the third quarter of fiscal year 2022 that reduced loans outstanding to Rayburn to $167 million as of May 31, 2022, from $379 million as of May 31, 2021. Rayburn was current on all of its debt obligations to us as of the date of this Report. Also, each of the borrowers with loans outstanding in the criticized category, with the exception of Brazos and Brazos Sandy Creek, was current with regard to all principal and


64


interest amounts due to us as of May 31, 2022. In comparison, each of the borrowers with loans outstanding in the criticized category, with the exception of Brazos, was current with regard to all principal and interest amounts due to us as of May 31, 2021. As discussed above under “Nonperforming Loans,” Brazos is not permitted to make scheduled loan payments without approval of the bankruptcy court and Brazos Sandy Creek’s loan outstanding of $28 million was delinquent as of May 31, 2022 and on nonaccrual status as of this date, as a result of its bankruptcy filing.

We provide additional information on our borrower risk rating classifications, including the amount of loans outstanding in each of the criticized loan categories of special mention, substandard and doubtful, in “Note 1—Summary of Significant
Accounting Policies” and “Note 4—Loans” in this Report.

Allowance for LoanCredit Losses


TheWe are required to maintain an allowance based on a current estimate of credit losses that are expected to occur over the remaining contractual term of the loans in our portfolio. Our allowance for loancredit losses represents management’s estimateconsists of probable losses inherenta collective allowance and an asset-specific allowance. The collective allowance is established for loans in our loan portfolio that share similar risk characteristics and are therefore evaluated on a collective, or pool, basis in measuring expected credit losses. The asset-specific allowance is established for loans in our portfolio that do not share similar risk characteristics with other loans in our portfolio and are therefore evaluated on an individual basis in measuring expected credit losses.

Table 19 presents, by legal entity and member class, loans outstanding and the related allowance for credit losses and allowance coverage ratio as of May 31, 2022 and 2021 and the allowance components as of each balance sheet date. We determine the allowance based on borrower risk ratings, historical loss experience, specific problem loans, economic conditions and other pertinent factors that, in management’s judgment, may affect the risk of loss in our loan portfolio.



Table 26 summarizes changes in the allowance for loan losses for the past five fiscal years and a comparison of the allowance by company as of the end of each of those years.

Table 26:19: Allowance for LoanCredit Losses by Borrower Member Class and Evaluation Methodology
 May 31,
20222021
(Dollars in thousands)
Loans Outstanding(1)
Allowance for Credit Losses
Allowance Coverage Ratio (2)
Loans Outstanding (1)
Allowance for Credit Losses
Allowance Coverage Ratio (2)
Member class:
CFC:
Distribution$23,844,242 $15,781 0.07 %$22,027,423 $13,426 0.06 %
Power supply4,901,770 47,793 0.98 5,154,312 64,646 1.25 
Statewide and associate126,863 1,251 0.99 106,121 1,391 1.31 
Total CFC28,872,875 64,825 0.22 27,287,856 79,463 0.29 
NCSC710,878 1,449 0.20 706,868 1,374 0.19 
RTFC467,601 1,286 0.28 420,383 4,695 1.12 
Total$30,051,354 $67,560 0.22 $28,415,107 $85,532 0.30 
Allowance components:
Collective allowance$29,814,380 $28,876 0.10 %$28,167,639 $42,442 0.15 %
Asset-specific allowance236,974 38,684 16.32 247,468 43,090 17.41 
Total$30,051,354 $67,560 0.22 $28,415,107 $85,532 0.30 
Allowance coverage ratios:
Nonperforming and nonaccrual loans (3)
$227,790 29.66 %$237,497 36.01 %
  Year Ended May 31,
(Dollars in thousands) 2019
2018 2017 2016 2015
Beginning balance $18,801
 $37,376
 $33,258
 $33,690
 $56,429
Provision (benefit) for loan losses (1,266) (18,575) 5,978
 (646) (21,954)
Net (charge-offs) recoveries 
 
 (1,860) 214
 (785)
Ending balance $17,535
 $18,801
 $37,376
 $33,258
 $33,690
___________________________
Allowance for loan losses by company:          
CFC $13,120
 $12,300
 $29,499
 $24,559
 $23,716
NCSC 2,007
 2,082
 2,910
 3,134
 5,441
RTFC 2,408
 4,419
 4,967
 5,565
 4,533
Total $17,535
 $18,801
 $37,376
 $33,258
 $33,690
           
Allowance coverage ratios:          
Total loans outstanding(1)
 $25,905,664
 $25,167,494
 $24,356,330
 $23,152,517
 $21,459,220
Percentage of total loans outstanding 0.07% 0.07% 0.15% 0.14% 0.16%
Percentage of total performing TDR loans outstanding 147.94
 149.23
 283.73
 240.86
 287.07
Percentage of total nonperforming TDR loans outstanding 
 
 
 948.60
 
Percentage of loans on nonaccrual status 
 
 
 948.60
 287.07
___________________________
(1) Represents the unpaid principal amountbalance, net of charge-offs and recoveries, of loans as of the end of each period presented and excludesperiod-end. Excludes unamortized deferred loan origination costs of $11 million as of May 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, and $10 million as of May 31, 2016 and 2015.


Our allowance for loan losses decreased by $1 million to $18 million as of May 31, 2019, from $19 million as of May 31, 2018. The allowance coverage ratio was 0.07% as of both May 31, 2019 and 2018. Loans designated as individually impaired totaled $12 million and $13 million as of May 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, and the specific allowance related to those loans totaled $1 million as of both May 31, 20192022 and 2018.2021.

(2)Calculated based on the allowance for credit losses attributable to each member class and allowance components at period-end divided by the related loans outstanding at period-end.
See “Critical Accounting Policies(3)Calculated based on the total allowance for credit losses at period-end divided by loans outstanding classified as nonperforming and Estimates—Allowanceon nonaccrual status at period-end.



65


Our allowance for Loan Losses”credit losses and allowance coverage ratio decreased to $68 million and 0.22%, respectively, as of May 31, 2022, from $86 million and 0.30% respectively, as of May 31, 2021. The $18 million decrease in the allowance for credit losses reflected a decrease in the collective and asset-specific allowance of $14 million and $4 million, respectively. The collective allowance decrease of $14 million was attributable to an improvement in Rayburn’s credit risk profile following the successful completion by Rayburn of a securitization transaction in February 2022 to cover extraordinary costs and expenses incurred during the February 2021 polar vortex and subsequent payment in full of its obligations to ERCOT and a significant reduction in loans outstanding to Rayburn due to payments received from Rayburn during fiscal year 2022. The asset-specific allowance decrease of $4 million stemmed from the combined impact of the elimination of an asset-specific allowance attributable to nonperforming loans totaling $9 million that were paid in full during the second quarter of fiscal year 2022 and the decrease of an asset-specific allowance for a nonperforming CFC power supply borrower, attributable to loan payments received on this loan, partially offset by the addition of an asset-specific allowance for Brazos Sandy Creek, due to its bankruptcy filing, as discussed above under Nonperforming Loans.

As a result of Rayburn’s payment in full of its February 2021 polar vortex-related outstanding obligations to ERCOT, we believe our exposure to the significant adverse financial impact on some electric utilities from the surge in wholesale power costs in Texas during the February 2021 polar vortex is now limited to loans outstanding to Brazos and its wholly-owned subsidiary Brazos Sandy Creek.

We discuss our methodology for estimating the allowance for credit losses under the CECL model in “Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies”Policies—Allowance for Credit Losses” and provide information on the methodology formanagement judgment and uncertainties involved in our determining ourthe allowance for loancredit losses and the key assumptions. See “Note 4—Loans”in above section “Critical Accounting Estimates—Allowance for Credit Losses” of this Report forReport. We provide additional information on theour loans and allowance for credit qualitylosses under “Note 4—Loans” and “Note 5—Allowance for Credit Losses” of our loan portfolio.this Report.


Counterparty Credit Risk


We are exposedIn addition to credit exposure from our borrowers, we enter into other types of financial transactions in the ordinary course of business that expose us to counterparty credit risk, primarily related to the performance of the parties with which we enter into financial transactions primarily for derivative instruments,involving our cash and time deposit accounts andcash equivalents, securities held in our investment security holdings. Tosecurities portfolio and derivatives. We mitigate thisour risk weby only enterentering into these transactions with financial institutionscounterparties with investment-grade ratings. ratings, establishing operational guidelines and counterparty exposure limits and monitoring our counterparty credit risk position. We evaluate our counterparties based on certain quantitative and qualitative factors and periodically assign internal risk rating grades to our counterparties.

Cash and Investments Securities Counterparty Credit Exposure

Our cash and time depositscash equivalents and investment securities totaled $154 million and $600 million, respectively, as of May 31, 2022. The primary credit exposure associated with investments held in our investments portfolio is that issuers will not repay principal and interest in accordance with the contractual terms. Our cash and cash equivalents with financial institutions generally have an original maturity of less than one year.year and pursuant to our investment policy guidelines, all fixed-income debt securities, at the time of purchase, must be rated at least investment grade based on external credit ratings from at least two of the leading global credit rating agencies, when available, or the corresponding equivalent, when not available. We therefore believe that the risk of default by these counterparties is low.


We provide additional information on the holdings in our investment securities portfolio below under “Liquidity Risk—Investment Securities Portfolio” and in “Note 3—Investment Securities.”

Derivative Counterparty Credit Exposure

Our derivative counterparty credit exposure relates principally to interest-rate swap contracts. We generally engage in OTC derivative transactions, which expose us to individual counterparty credit risk because these transactions are executed and settled directly between us and each counterparty. We are exposed to the risk that an individual derivative counterparty will default on payments due to us, which we may not be able to collect or which may require us to seek a replacement derivative from a different counterparty. This replacement may be at a higher cost, or we may be unable to find a suitable replacement.



66


We manage our derivative counterparty credit riskexposure by monitoring the overallexecuting derivative transactions with financial institutions that have investment-grade credit worthiness of each counterparty based on our internal counterparty credit risk scoring model; using counterparty-specific credit risk limits; executingratings and maintaining enforceable master netting arrangements;arrangements with these counterparties, which allow us to net derivative assets and diversifying our derivative transactions among multiple counterparties.liabilities with the same counterparty. We also require that our derivative counterparties be a participant in one of our committed bank revolving line of credit agreements. Ourhad 12 active derivative counterparties hadwith credit ratings ranging from Aa1 to Baa1 and Aa2 to Baa2 by Moody’s Investors Service (“Moody’s”)as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, and from AA- to BBB+A- by S&P Global Inc. (“S&P”)as of both May 31, 2022 and 2021. The total outstanding notional amount of derivatives with these counterparties was $8,062 million and $8,979 million as of May 31, 2019. Our largest2022 and 2021, respectively. The highest single derivative counterparty exposure, based on theconcentration, by outstanding

notional amount, representedaccounted for approximately 23% and 24% of the total outstanding notional amount of our derivatives as of
both May 31, 20192022 and 2018, respectively.2021.


Credit Risk-Related Contingent Features

OurWhile our derivative agreements include netting provisions that allow for offsetting of all contracts typically contain mutual early-termination provisions, generallywith a given counterparty in the formevent of a credit rating trigger. Under the mutual credit rating trigger provisions, either counterparty may, but is not obligated to, terminate and settle the agreement if the credit ratingdefault by one of the other counterparty falls belowtwo parties, we report the fair value of our derivatives on a level specified in the agreement. Ifgross basis by individual contract as either a derivative contract is terminated,asset or derivative liability on our consolidated balance sheets. However, we estimate our exposure to credit loss on our derivatives by calculating the amountreplacement cost to be received or paid by us would be equal to the prevailing fair value,settle at current market prices, as defined in our derivative agreements, all outstanding derivatives in a net gain position at the agreement,counterparty level where a right of legal offset exists. As indicated in “Note 10—Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities—Impact of Derivatives on Consolidated Balance Sheets,” our outstanding derivatives, at the individual counterparty level, were in a net gain position of $94 million as of May 31, 2022. In comparison, our outstanding derivatives, at the termination date.

Our senior unsecured credit ratings from Moody’s and S&Pindividual counterparty level, were A2 and A, respectively,in a net loss position of $464 million as of May 31, 2019. Both Moody’s and S&P had2021; as such, we did not have exposure to credit loss on our ratings on stable outlookoutstanding derivatives as of May 31, 2019. Table 27displays the notional amountsthis date.

We provide additional detail on our derivative agreements, including a discussion of our derivative contracts with credit rating triggers as of May 31, 2019, and the payments that would be required if the contracts were terminated as of that date because of a downgrade of our unsecured credit ratings or the counterparty’s unsecured credit ratings below A3/A-, below Baa1/BBB+, to or below Baa2/BBB, below Baa3/BBB- or to or below Ba2/BB+ by Moody’s or S&P, respectively. In calculating the paymentsettlement amounts that would be required upon termination of the derivative contracts, we assumed that the amounts for each counterparty would be netted in accordance with the provisions of the counterparty’s master netting agreements. The net payment amounts are based on the fair value of the underlying derivative instrument, excluding the credit risk valuation adjustment, plus any unpaid accrued interest amounts.

Table 27: Rating Triggers for Derivatives
(Dollars in thousands) Notional Amount Payable Due From CFC Receivable Due to CFC Net (Payable)/Receivable
Impact of rating downgrade trigger:        
Falls below A3/A-(1)
 $50,460
 $(9,379) $
 $(9,379)
Falls below Baa1/BBB+ 7,024,759
 (224,501) 5
 (224,496)
Falls to or below Baa2/BBB (2)
 562,062
 (7,132) 
 (7,132)
Falls below Baa3/BBB- 221,865
 (12,292) 
 (12,292)
Total $7,859,146
 $(253,304) $5
 $(253,299)
___________________________
(1) Rating trigger for CFC falls below A3/A-, while rating trigger for counterparty falls below Baa1/BBB+ by Moody’s or S&P, respectively.
(2) Rating trigger for CFC falls to or below Baa2/BBB, while rating trigger for counterparty falls to or below Ba2/BB+ by Moody’s or S&P, respectively.

We have outstanding notional amount of derivatives with one counterparty subject to a ratings trigger and early termination provision in the event of a downgrade of CFC’s senior unsecured credit ratings below Baa3, BBB- or BBB- by Moody’s, S&P or Fitch Ratings Inc. (“Fitch”), respectively, which is not includedtrigger, in the above table, totaling $165 million as of May 31, 2019. These contracts were in an unrealized loss position of $20 million as of May 31, 2019.“Note 10—Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.”

The aggregate fair value amount, including the credit valuation adjustment, of all interest rate swaps with rating triggers that were in a net liability position was $266 million as of May 31, 2019. There were no counterparties that fell below the rating trigger levels in our interest swap contracts as of May 31, 2019. If a counterparty has a credit rating that falls below the rating trigger level specified in the interest swap contract, we have the option to terminate all derivatives with the counterparty. However, we generally do not terminate such agreements prematurely because our interest rate swaps are critical to our matched funding strategy to mitigate interest rate risk.


See “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in this Report for additional information about credit riskrisks related to our business.


LIQUIDITY RISK


We define liquidity as the ability to convert assets into cash quickly and efficiently, maintain access to readily available funding and rolloverroll over or issue new debt under both normal operating conditions and periods of CFC-specific and/or market stress, to ensure that we can meet borrower loan requests, pay current and future obligations and fund our operations onin a cost-effective basis. manner.

Our primary sources of liquidityfunds include cash flows from operations, member loan principal repayments, securities held in our investment portfolio, committed bank revolving lines of credit, committed loan facilities under the Guaranteed Underwriter Program, revolving note purchase agreements with Farmer Mac and our abilityproceeds from debt issuances to issue debtmembers and in the capital markets,markets. Our primary uses of funds include loan advances to members, principal and interest payments on borrowings, periodic interest settlement payments related to our membersderivative contracts and in private placements. operating expenses.


Short-Term Borrowings

Short-term borrowings consist of borrowings with an original contractual maturity of one year or less and do not include the current portion of long-term debt. Short-term borrowings increased to $4,981 million as of May 31, 2022, from $4,582 million as of May 31, 2021, primarily due to an increase in short-term member investments, and accounted for 17% of total debt outstanding as of each respective date. See “Liquidity Risk” below and “Note 6—Short-Term Borrowings” for information on the composition of our short-term borrowings.

Long-Term and Subordinated Debt

Long-term debt, defined as debt with an original contractual maturity term of greater than one year, primarily consists of medium-term notes, collateral trust bonds, notes payable under the Guaranteed Underwriter Program and notes payable under our Farmer Mac revolving note purchase agreement. Subordinated debt consists of subordinated deferrable debt and members’ subordinated certificates. Our subordinated deferrable debt and members’ subordinated certificates have original contractual maturity terms of greater than one year.

Long-term and subordinated debt of $23,766 million and $22,844 million as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, accounted for 83% of total debt outstanding as of each respective date. We provide additional information on our long-term debt below under the section “Liquidity Risk” and “Note 7—Long-Term Debt” and “Note 8—Subordinated Deferrable Debt” in this Report.









53


Equity

Table 13 presents the components of total CFC equity and total equity as of May 31, 2022 and 2021.

Table 13: Equity
May 31,Change
(Dollars in thousands)20222021
Equity components:
Membership fees and educational fund:
Membership fees$970 $968 $
Educational fund2,417 2,157 260 
Total membership fees and educational fund3,387 3,125 262 
Patronage capital allocated954,988 923,970 31,018 
Members’ capital reserve1,062,286 909,749 152,537 
Total allocated equity2,020,661 1,836,844 183,817 
Unallocated net income (loss):
Prior fiscal year-end cumulative derivative forward value losses(1)
(461,162)(1,079,739)618,577 
Year-to-date derivative forward value gains(1)
553,525 618,577 (65,052)
Period-end cumulative derivative forward value gains (losses)(1)
92,363 (461,162)553,525 
Other unallocated net loss(709)(709)— 
Unallocated net income (loss)91,654 (461,871)553,525 
CFC retained equity2,112,315 1,374,973 737,342 
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)2,258 (25)2,283 
Total CFC equity2,114,573 1,374,948 739,625 
Noncontrolling interests27,396 24,931 2,465 
Total equity$2,141,969 $1,399,879 $742,090 
____________________________
(1)Represents derivative forward value gains (losses) for CFC only, as total CFC equity does not include the noncontrolling interests of the variable interest entities NCSC and RTFC, which we are required to consolidate. We present the consolidated total derivative forward value gains (losses) in Table 37 in the “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” section below. Also, see “Note 16—Business Segments” for the statements of operations for CFC.

The increase in total equity of $742 million to $2,142 million as of May 31, 2022 was attributable to our reported net income of $799 million for fiscal year 2022, partially offset by the CFC Board of Directors’ authorized patronage capital retirement in July 2021 of $58 million.

Allocation and Retirement of Patronage Capital

We are subject to District of Columbia law governing cooperatives, under which CFC is required to make annual allocations of net earnings, if any, in accordance with the provisions of the District of Columbia statutes. District of Columbia cooperative law requires cooperatives to allocate net earnings to patrons, to a general reserve in an amount sufficient to maintain a balance of at least 50% of paid-up capital and to a cooperative educational fund, as well as permits additional allocations to board-approved reserves. District of Columbia cooperative law also requires that a cooperative’s net earnings be allocated to all patrons in proportion to their individual patronage and each patron’s allocation be distributed to the patron unless the patron agrees that the cooperative may retain its share as additional capital. Pursuant to these provisions, the CFC Board of Directors is required to make annual allocations of net earnings, if any. CFC’s net earnings for determining allocations is based on non-GAAP adjusted net income, which excludes the impact of derivative forward value gains (losses). We provide a reconciliation of our adjusted net income to our reported net income and an explanation of the adjustments below in “Non-GAAP Financial Measures.”



54


In May 2022, the CFC Board of Directors authorized the allocation of $1 million of net earnings for fiscal year 2022 to the cooperative educational fund. In July 2022, the CFC Board of Directors authorized the allocation of fiscal year 2022 adjusted net income follows: $89 million to members in the form of patronage capital and $153 million to the members’ capital reserve. In July 2022, the CFC Board of Directors also authorized the retirement of patronage capital totaling $59 million, of which $44 million represented 50% of the patronage capital allocation for fiscal year 2022 and $15 million represented the portion of the allocation from fiscal year 1997 net earnings that has been held for 25 years pursuant to the CFC Board of Directors’ policy. We expect to return the authorized patronage capital retirement amount of $59 million to members in cash in the second quarter of fiscal year 2023. The remaining portion of the patronage capital allocation for fiscal year 2022 will be retained by CFC for 25 years pursuant to the guidelines adopted by the CFC Board of Directors in June 2009.

In May 2021, the CFC Board of Directors authorized the allocation of $1 million of net earnings for fiscal year 2021 to the cooperative educational fund. In July 2021 the CFC Board of Directors authorized the allocation of fiscal year 2021 adjusted net income as follows: $90 million to members in the form of patronage capital and $102 million to the members’ capital reserve. In July 2021, the CFC Board of Directors also authorized the retirement of patronage capital totaling $58 million, of which $45 million represented 50% of the patronage capital allocation for fiscal year 2021 and $13 million represented the portion of the allocation from fiscal year 1996 net earnings that has been held for 25 years pursuant to the CFC Board of Directors’ policy. This amount was returned to members in cash in September 2021. The remaining portion of the patronage capital allocation for fiscal year 2021 will be retained by CFC for 25 years pursuant to the guidelines adopted by the CFC Board of Directors in June 2009.

The CFC Board of Directors is required to make annual allocations of adjusted net income, if any. CFC has made annual retirements of allocated net earnings in 42 of the last 43 fiscal years; however, future retirements of allocated amounts are determined based on CFC’s financial condition. The CFC Board of Directors has the authority to change the current practice for allocating and retiring net earnings at any time, subject to applicable laws.

ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT

Overview

We face a variety of risks that can significantly affect our financial performance, liquidity, reputation and ability to meet the expectations of our members, investors and other stakeholders. As a financial services company, the major categories of risk exposures inherent in our business activities include credit risk, liquidity risk, market risk and operational risk. These risk categories are summarized below.

Credit risk is the risk that a borrower or other counterparty will be unable to meet its obligations in accordance with agreed-upon terms.

Liquidity risk is the risk that we will be unable to fund our operations and meet our contractual obligations or that we will be unable to fund new loans to borrowers at a reasonable cost and tenor in a timely manner.

Market risk is the risk that changes in market variables, such as movements in interest rates, may adversely affect the match between the timing of the contractual maturities, re-pricing and prepayments of our financial assets and the related financial liabilities funding those assets.

Operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal controls, processes, systems, human error or external events, including natural disasters or public health emergencies, such as the current COVID-19 pandemic. Operational risk also includes cybersecurity risk, compliance risk, fiduciary risk, reputational risk and litigation risk.

Effective risk management is critical to our overall operations and to achieving our primary objective of providing cost-based financial products to our rural electric members while maintaining the sound financial results required for investment-grade credit ratings on our rated debt instruments. Accordingly, we have a risk-management framework that is intended to govern the principal risks we face in conducting our business and the aggregate amount of risk we are willing to accept, referred to as risk appetite and risk guidelines, in the context of CFC’s mission and strategic objectives and initiatives.


55


Risk-Management Framework

Our Enterprise Risk Management (“ERM”) framework consists of a defined policy and process for measuring, assessing and responding to key risks in alignment with CFC’s mission and CFC’s Board of Director’s strategic objectives. The board of directors has responsibility for the oversight and strategic direction of the ERM framework and has adopted a comprehensive risk-management policy that describes the roles and responsibilities of the board and management within this framework for identifying and managing risks. In fulfilling its risk-management oversight duties, the board of directors receives periodic reports on business activities and risk-management activities from management. Throughout the year at its periodic meetings, the CFC Board of Directors reviews important trends and emerging developments across key risks as assessed, measured and evaluated by management. The board also establishes CFC’s loan policies and has established a Loan Committee of the board comprising no fewer than 10 directors that reviews the performance of the loan portfolio in accordance with those policies. For additional information about the role of the CFC Board of Directors in risk governance and oversight, see “Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.”

Management is primarily accountable for execution of the ERM responsibilities and daily management of the risks associated with our business. Management executes its responsibility by establishing processes for identifying, measuring, assessing, managing, monitoring and reporting risks. Management also is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal controls to mitigate key risks. We have a number of management-level risk oversight committees across the organization and groups within the organization that have a defined set of authorities and responsibilities specific to one or more risk types, including the Corporate Credit Committee, Asset Liability Committee, Investment Management Committee, and Disclosure Committee. Management provides reports to the board of directors at each regularly scheduled board meeting, and more frequently as requested by the board of directors, relating to, among other things, the ongoing progress of managing risk at CFC given the ERM framework; management’s responses for the critical business risks identified during the risk assessment process and the status of any gaps or deficiencies; and CFC’s risk profile and trends, as well as emerging risks and opportunities.

CREDIT RISK

Our loan portfolio, which represents the largest component of assets on our balance sheet, accounts for the substantial majority of our credit risk exposure. We also engage in certain non-lending activities that may give rise to counterparty credit risk, such as entering into derivative transactions to manage interest rate risk and purchasing investment securities.

Credit Risk Management


We manage credit risk related to our loan portfolio consistent with credit policies established by the CFC Board of Directors and through credit underwriting, approval and monitoring processes and practices adopted by management. Our liquidity risk-management frameworkboard-established credit policies include guidelines regarding the types of credit products we offer, limits on credit we extend to individual borrowers, approval authorities delegated to management, and use of syndications and loan sales. We maintain an internal risk rating system in which we assign a rating to each borrower and credit facility. We review and update the risk ratings at least annually. Assigned risk ratings inform our credit approval, borrower monitoring and portfolio review processes. Our Corporate Credit Committee approves individual credit actions within its own authority and together with our Credit Risk Management group, establishes standards for credit underwriting, oversees credits deemed to be higher risk, reviews assigned risk ratings for accuracy, and monitors the overall credit quality and performance statistics of our loan portfolio.

Loan Portfolio Credit Risk

Our primary credit exposure is designedloans to meet our liquidity objectivesrural electric cooperatives, which provide essential electric services to end-users, the majority of providingwhich are residential customers. We also have a reliable sourcelimited portfolio of loans to not-for-profit and for-profit telecommunication companies. As a member-owned finance cooperative, CFC’s principal focus is to provide funding to its rural electric utility cooperative members meet maturingto assist them in acquiring, constructing and operating electric distribution systems, power supply systems and related facilities. Loans outstanding to electric utility organizations totaled $29,584 million and $27,995 million as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, representing 98% and 99% of total loans outstanding as of each respective date. The remaining loans outstanding in our loan portfolio were to RTFC members,


56


affiliates and associates in the telecommunications industry sector. The substantial majority of loans to our borrowers are long-term fixed-rate loans with terms of up to 35 years. Long-term fixed-rate loans accounted for 90% of total loans outstanding as of both May 31, 2022 and 2021.

Because we lend primarily to our rural electric utility cooperative members, we have had a loan portfolio inherently subject to single-industry and single-obligor credit concentration risk since our inception in 1969. We historically, however, have experienced limited defaults and losses in our electric utility loan portfolio due to several factors. First, the majority of our electric cooperative borrowers operate in states where electric cooperatives are not subject to rate regulation. Thus, they are able to make rate adjustments to pass along increased costs to the end customer without first obtaining state regulatory approval, allowing them to cover operating costs and generate sufficient earnings and cash flows to service their debt obligations. Second, electric cooperatives face limited competition, as they tend to operate in exclusive territories not serviced by public investor-owned utilities. Third, electric cooperatives typically are consumer-owned, not-for-profit entities that provide an essential service to end-users, the majority of which are residential customers. As not-for-profit entities, rural electric cooperatives, unlike investor-owned utilities, generally are eligible to apply for assistance from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (“FEMA”) and otherstates to help recover from major disasters or emergencies. Fourth, electric cooperatives tend to adhere to a conservative core business strategy model that has historically resulted in a relatively stable, resilient operating environment and overall strong financial obligations, issue new debtperformance and fundcredit strength for the electric cooperative network. Finally, we generally lend to our operationsmembers on a cost-effectivesenior secured basis, which reduces the risk of loss in the event of a borrower default.

Below we provide information on the credit risk profile of our loan portfolio, including security provisions, credit concentration, credit quality indicators and our allowance for credit losses.

Security Provisions

Except when providing line of credit loans, we generally lend to our members on a senior secured basis. Long-term loans are generally secured on parity with other secured lenders (primarily RUS), if any, by all assets and revenue of the borrower with exceptions typical in utility mortgages. Line of credit loans are generally unsecured. In addition to the collateral pledged to secure our loans, distribution and power supply borrowers also are required to set rates charged to customers to achieve certain specified financial ratios. Table 14 presents, by legal entity and member class and by loan type, secured and unsecured loans in our loan portfolio as of May 31, 2022 and 2021. Of our total loans outstanding, 93% were secured as of both May 31, 2022 and 2021.



57


Table 14: Loans—Loan Portfolio Security Profile
May 31, 2022
(Dollars in thousands)Secured% of TotalUnsecured% of TotalTotal
Member class:
CFC:
Distribution$22,405,486 94 %$1,438,756 6 %$23,844,242 
Power supply4,455,098 91 446,6729 4,901,770 
Statewide and associate83,759 66 43,10434 126,863 
Total CFC26,944,343 93 1,928,532 7 28,872,875 
NCSC689,887 97 20,991 3 710,878 
RTFC454,985 97 12,616 3 467,601 
Total loans outstanding(1)
$28,089,215 93 $1,962,139 7 $30,051,354 
Loan type:
Long-term loans:
Fixed-rate$26,731,763 99 %$220,609 1 %$26,952,372 
Variable-rate817,866 100 2,335  820,201 
Total long-term loans27,549,629 99 222,944 1 27,772,573 
Line of credit loans539,586 24 1,739,195 76 2,278,781 
Total loans outstanding(1)
$28,089,215 93 $1,962,139 7 $30,051,354 
May 31, 2021
(Dollars in thousands)Secured% of TotalUnsecured% of TotalTotal
Member class:
CFC:
Distribution$20,702,657 94 %$1,324,766 %$22,027,423 
Power supply4,458,311 86 696,00114 5,154,312 
Statewide and associate88,004 83 18,11717 106,121 
Total CFC25,248,972 93 2,038,884 27,287,856 
NCSC662,782 94 44,086 706,868 
RTFC399,717 95 20,666 420,383 
Total loans outstanding(1)
$26,311,471 93 $2,103,636 $28,415,107 
Loan type:
Long-term loans:
Fixed-rate$25,278,805 99 %$235,961 %$25,514,766 
Variable-rate655,675 100 2,904 — 658,579 
Total long-term loans25,934,480 99 238,865 26,173,345 
Line of credit loans376,991 17 1,864,771 83 2,241,762 
Total loans outstanding(1)
$26,311,471 93 $2,103,636 $28,415,107 
____________________________
(1)Represents the unpaid principal balance, net of charge-offs and recoveries of loans as of the end of each period. Excludes unamortized deferred loan origination costs of $12 million as of both May 31, 2022 and 2021.








58


Credit Concentration

Concentrations of credit may exist when a lender has large credit exposures to single borrowers, large credit exposures to borrowers in the same industry sector or engaged in similar activities or large credit exposures to borrowers in a geographic region that would cause the borrowers to be similarly impacted by economic or other conditions in the region. As discussed above under normal operating conditions as well as under CFC-specific and/or market stress conditions. We engage in various activities“Credit Risk—Loan Portfolio Credit Risk,” because we lend primarily to manage liquidityour rural electric utility cooperative members, our loan portfolio is inherently subject to single-industry and single-obligor credit concentration risk, and achieveloans outstanding to electric utility organizations totaled $29,584 million and $27,995 million as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, representing 98% and 99% of our liquidity objectives.total loans outstanding of each respective date.

Single-Obligor Concentration

Table 15 displays the outstanding loan exposure for our 20 largest borrowers, by legal entity and member class, as of May 31, 2022 and 2021. Our Asset Liability Committee establishes guidelines that are intended20 largest borrowers consisted of 12 distribution systems and eight power supply systems as of May 31, 2022. In comparison, our 20 largest borrowers consisted of 10 distribution systems and 10 power supply systems as of May 31, 2021. The largest total exposure to ensure that we maintain sufficient, diversified sourcesa single borrower or controlled group represented less than 2% of liquiditytotal loans outstanding as of both May 31, 2022 and 2021.

Table 15: Loans—Loan Exposure to cover potential funding requirements as well as unanticipated contingencies. Our Treasury group develops strategies to manage our targeted liquidity position, projects our funding needs under various scenarios, including adverse circumstances, and monitors our liquidity position on an ongoing basis.20 Largest Borrowers

May 31,
  20222021
(Dollars in thousands)Amount% of TotalAmount% of Total
Member class:  
CFC:
Distribution$3,929,160 13 %$3,312,571 12 %
Power supply2,095,640 7 2,665,771 
Total CFC6,024,800 20 5,978,342 21 
NCSC195,001 1 203,392 
Total loan exposure to 20 largest borrowers6,219,801 21 6,181,734 22 
Less: Loans covered under Farmer Mac standby purchase commitment(316,367)(1)(308,580)(1)
Net loan exposure to 20 largest borrowers$5,903,434 20 %$5,873,154 21 %
Available Liquidity

As part of our strategy in managing liquidity riskcredit exposure to large borrowers, we entered into a long-term standby purchase commitment agreement with Farmer Mac during fiscal year 2016. Under this agreement, we may designate certain long-term loans to be covered under the commitment, subject to approval by Farmer Mac, and meeting our liquidity objectives, we seek to maintain a substantial levelin the event any such loan later goes into payment default for at least 90 days, upon request by us, Farmer Mac must purchase such loan at par value. The aggregate unpaid principal balance of on-balance sheetdesignated and off-balance sheet sources of liquidity that are readily available for access to meet our near-term liquidity needs. Table 28 presents the sources of our available liquidityFarmer Mac-approved loans was $493 million and $512 million as of May 31, 20192022 and 2018.2021, respectively. Loan exposure to our 20 largest borrowers covered under the Farmer Mac agreement totaled $316 million and $309 million as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, which reduced our exposure to the 20 largest borrowers to 20% and 21% as of each respective date. No loans have been put to Farmer Mac for purchase pursuant to this agreement. Our credit exposure is also mitigated by long-term loans guaranteed by RUS, which totaled $131 million and $139 million as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.


Table 28: AvailableLiquidityGeographic Concentration

Although our organizational structure and mission results in single-industry concentration, we serve a geographically diverse group of electric and telecommunications borrowers throughout the U.S. The consolidated number of borrowers with loans outstanding totaled 883 and 892 as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, located in 49 states and the District of Columbia. Of the 883 and 892 borrowers with loans outstanding as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, 49 were electric power supply borrowers as of each respective date. Electric power supply borrowers generally require significantly more capital than electric distribution and telecommunications borrowers.



59


  May 31,
  2019 2018
(Dollars in millions) Total Accessed Available Total Accessed Available
Cash and cash equivalents $178
 $
 $178
 $231
 $
 $231
Committed bank revolving line of credit agreements—unsecured(1)
 2,975
 3
 2,972
 3,085
 3
 3,082
Guaranteed Underwriter Program committed facilities—secured(2)
 7,298
 5,948
 1,350
 6,548
 5,323
 1,225
Farmer Mac revolving note purchase agreement, dated March 24, 2011, as amended—secured(3)
 5,200
 3,055
 2,145
 5,200
 2,791
 2,409
Farmer Mac revolving note purchase agreement, dated July 31, 2015, as amended—secured 300
 
 300
 300
 100
 200
Total $15,951
 $9,006
 $6,945
 $15,364
 $8,217
 $7,147
Texas, which had 68 and 67 borrowers with loans outstanding as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, accounted for the largest number of borrowers with loans outstanding in any one state as of each respective date, as well as the largest concentration of loan exposure in any one state. Loans outstanding to Texas-based electric utility organizations totaled $5,104 million and $4,878 million as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, and accounted for approximately 17% of total loans outstanding as of each respective date. Of the loans outstanding to Texas-based electric utility organizations, $163 million and $172 million as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, were covered by the Farmer Mac standby repurchase agreement, which reduced our credit risk exposure to Texas-based borrowers to 16% of total loans outstanding as of each respective date. Of the 49 electric power supply borrowers with loans outstanding as of May 31, 2022, eight were located in Texas.
____________________________
(1)The committed bank revolving lineTable 16 provides a breakdown, by state or U.S. territory, of the total number of borrowers with loans outstanding as of May 31, 2022 and 2021 and the outstanding loan exposure to borrowers in each jurisdiction as a percentage of total loans outstanding of $30,051 million and $28,415 million as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.




60


Table 16: Loans—Loan Geographic Concentration
May 31,
 20222021
U.S. State/TerritoryNumber of Borrowers% of Total Loans
Outstanding
Number of
Borrowers
% of Total Loans
Outstanding
Alabama212.37 %242.28 %
Alaska163.29 163.48 
Arizona110.95 110.80 
Arkansas212.42 202.21 
California40.12 40.12 
Colorado275.53 275.70 
Delaware30.26 30.31 
District of Columbia10.10 — — 
Florida193.65 183.84 
Georgia455.33 455.42 
Hawaii20.32 20.36 
Idaho100.41 110.40 
Illinois323.23 313.22 
Indiana403.67 393.21 
Iowa352.31 342.32 
Kansas283.78 294.13 
Kentucky232.47 232.65 
Louisiana82.49 91.95 
Maine30.07 30.08 
Maryland21.48 21.56 
Massachusetts10.20 10.21 
Michigan111.70 111.32 
Minnesota462.16 482.38 
Mississippi211.86 201.58 
Missouri445.65 465.65 
Montana230.80 250.77 
Nebraska90.10 120.10 
Nevada80.82 80.80 
New Hampshire20.36 20.30 
New Jersey20.07 20.06 
New Mexico120.17 130.20 
New York130.42 130.43 
North Carolina262.85 283.08 
North Dakota162.83 142.90 
Ohio272.10 272.18 
Oklahoma253.18 273.40 
Oregon191.24 191.27 
Pennsylvania151.75 161.78 
Rhode Island10.03 10.02 
South Carolina232.80 242.77 
South Dakota290.67 290.64 
Tennessee170.78 160.71 
Texas6817.01 6717.17 
Utah40.78 40.92 
Vermont50.16 50.18 
Virginia171.38 171.08 
Washington101.02 101.12 
West Virginia20.03 20.04 
Wisconsin241.79 231.82 
Wyoming121.04 111.08 
Total883 100.00 %892 100.00 %




61


Credit Quality Indicators

Assessing the overall credit quality of our loan portfolio and measuring our credit risk is an ongoing process that involves tracking payment status, troubled debt restructurings, nonperforming loans, charge-offs, the internal risk ratings of our borrowers and other indicators of credit agreements consistrisk. We monitor and subject each borrower and loan facility in our loan portfolio to an individual risk assessment based on quantitative and qualitative factors. Payment status trends and internal risk ratings are indicators, among others, of the probability of borrower default and overall credit quality of our loan portfolio. We believe the overall credit quality of our loan portfolio remained strong as of May 31, 2022.

Troubled Debt Restructurings

We actively monitor problem loans and, from time to time, attempt to work with borrowers to manage such exposures through loan workouts or modifications that better align with the borrower’s current ability to pay. A loan restructuring or modification of terms is accounted for as a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”) if, for economic or legal reasons related to the borrower’s financial difficulties, a concession is granted to the borrower that we would not otherwise consider. TDR loans generally are initially classified as nonperforming and placed on nonaccrual status, although in many cases such loans were already classified as nonperforming prior to modification. These loans may be returned to performing status and the accrual of interest resumed if the borrower performs under the modified terms for an extended period of time, and we expect the borrower to continue to perform in accordance with the modified terms. In certain limited circumstances in which a TDR loan is current at the modification date, the loan may remain on accrual status at the time of modification.

We have not had any loan modifications that were required to be accounted for as TDRs since fiscal year 2016. Table 17 presents the outstanding amount of modified loans accounted for as TDRs in prior periods, by member class, and the performance status of these loans as of May 31, 2022 and 2021.
Table 17: Loans—Troubled Debt Restructured Loans
May 31,
20222021
(Dollars in thousands)Number of Borrowers
Outstanding Amount(1)
% of Total Loans OutstandingNumber of Borrowers
Outstanding Amount(1)
% of Total Loans Outstanding
TDR loans:
CFC—Distribution1$5,092 0.02 %1$5,379 0.02 %
RTFC14,092 0.01 14,592 0.02 
Total TDR loans2$9,184 0.03 %2$9,971 0.04 %
Performance status of TDR loans:
Performing TDR loans2$9,184 0.03 %2$9,971 0.04 %
Total TDR loans2$9,184 0.03 %2$9,971 0.04 %
____________________________
(1) Represents the unpaid principal balance net of charge-offs and recoveries as of the end of each period.

We had TDR loans outstanding to two borrowers totaling $9 million and $10 million as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, consisting of loan modifications to a CFC electric distribution borrower and an RTFC telecommunications borrower, which at the time of the modification, were experiencing financial difficulty. Since the modification date, the loans have been performing in accordance with the terms of their respective restructured loan agreement for an extended period of time and were classified as performing and on accrual status as of May 31, 2022 and 2021. We did not have any TDR loans classified as nonperforming as of May 31, 2022 or May 31, 2021. Although TDR loans may be returned to performing status if the borrower performs under the modified terms of the loan for an extended period of time, we evaluate TDR loans on an individual basis in measuring expected credit losses for these loans.






62


Nonperforming Loans

In addition to TDR loans that may be classified as nonperforming, we also may have nonperforming loans that have not been modified as a TDR. We classify such loans as nonperforming at the earlier of the date when we determine: (i) interest or principal payments on the loan is past due 90 days or more; (ii) as a result of court proceedings, the collection of interest or principal payments based on the original contractual terms is not expected; or (iii) the full and timely collection of interest or principal is otherwise uncertain. Once a loan is classified as nonperforming, we generally place the loan on nonaccrual status. Interest accrued but not collected at the date a loan is placed on nonaccrual status is reversed against earnings. Table 18 presents the outstanding balance of nonperforming loans, by member class, as of May 31, 2022 and 2021.

Table 18: Loans—Nonperforming Loans
May 31,
 20222021
(Dollars in thousands)Number of Borrowers
Outstanding Amount (1)
% of Total Loans OutstandingNumber of Borrowers
Outstanding Amount (1)
% of Total Loans Outstanding
Nonperforming loans:  
CFC—Power supply(2)
3$227,790 0.76 %2$228,312 0.81 %
RTFC—   29,185 0.03 
Total nonperforming loans3$227,790 0.76 %4$237,497 0.84 %
____________________________
(1) Represents the unpaid principal balance net of charge-offs and recoveries as of the end of each period.
(2) In addition, we had less than $1 million in letters of credit outstanding to Brazos as of May 31, 2021.

We had loans to three borrowers totaling $228 million classified as nonperforming as of May 31, 2022. In comparison, we had loans to four borrowers totaling $237 million classified as nonperforming as of May 31, 2021. Nonperforming loans represented 0.76% and 0.84% of total loans outstanding as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The reduction in nonperforming loans of $9 million during the current fiscal year was due in part to our receipt of full payment of all amounts due on nonperforming loans to two RTFC borrowers totaling $9 million during the second quarter of fiscal year 2022. In addition, we have continued to receive payments on the remaining outstanding nonperforming loan to a CFC electric power supply borrower, including payments of $29 million during the current fiscal year, which reduced the balance of this loan to $114 million as of May 31, 2022, from $143 million as of May 31, 2021. These reductions were partially offset by the classification during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2022 of the $28 million loan outstanding to Brazos Sandy Creek as nonperforming following its bankruptcy filing, as discussed below.

Loans outstanding to Brazos, which filed for bankruptcy in March 2021 due to its exposure to elevated wholesale electric power costs during the February 2021 polar vortex, accounted for $86 million and $85 million of our total nonperforming loans as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Brazos is not permitted to make scheduled loan payments without approval of the bankruptcy court. As a result, we have not received payments from Brazos since March 2021, and its loans outstanding were delinquent as of each respective date.

On March 18, 2022, Brazos Sandy Creek, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Brazos and a CFC Texas-based electric power supply borrower, filed for bankruptcy following the filing of a three-yearmotion by Brazos to reject its power purchase agreement with Brazos Sandy Creek as part of Brazos’ bankruptcy proceedings. A Chapter 7 Trustee has been appointed, and the Chapter 7 Trustee has been approved by the bankruptcy court to operate Brazos Sandy Creek as a five-year linegoing concern. CFC had a secured loan outstanding to Brazos Sandy Creek totaling $28 million as of May 31, 2022, which, upon notification of the bankruptcy filing by Brazos Sandy Creek, was classified as nonperforming during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2022. Brazos Sandy Creek’s loan outstanding of $28 million was delinquent as of May 31, 2022 and on nonaccrual status as of this date. Aggregate loans outstanding to Brazos and Brazos Sandy Creek totaled $114 million as of May 31, 2022, of which $49 million were secured and $65 million were unsecured.

Net Charge-Offs

Charge-offs represent the amount of a loan that has been removed from our consolidated balance sheet when the loan is deemed uncollectible. Generally the amount of a charge-off is the recorded investment in excess of the fair value of the


63


expected cash flows from the loan, or, if the loan is collateral dependent, the fair value of the underlying collateral securing the loan. We report charge-offs net of amounts recovered on previously charged off loans. We had no loan charge-offs during fiscal years 2022, 2021 or 2020. Prior to Brazos’ and Brazos Sandy Creek’s bankruptcy filings, we had not experienced any defaults or charge-offs in our electric utility and telecommunications loan portfolios since fiscal year 2013 and 2017, respectively.

In our 53-year history, we have experienced only 18 defaults in our electric utility loan portfolio, which includes our most recent defaults by Brazos and Brazos Sandy Creek due to their bankruptcy filing in March 2021 and March 2022, respectively. Of the 16 defaults prior to Brazos and Brazos Sandy Creek, one remains unresolved with an expected ultimate resolution date in calendar year 2025, nine resulted in no loss and six resulted in cumulative net charge-offs of $86 million. Of this amount, $67 million was attributable to five electric power supply cooperatives and $19 million was attributable to one electric distribution cooperative. We cite the factors that have historically contributed to the relatively low risk of default by our electric utility cooperatives, our principal lending market, above under “Credit Risk—Loan Portfolio Credit Risk.”

In comparison, since inception in 1987, we have experienced 15 defaults and cumulative net charge-offs of $427 million in our telecommunications loan portfolio, the most significant of which was a charge-off of $354 million in fiscal year 2011.

Borrower Risk Ratings

As part of our management of credit agreement.risk, we maintain a credit risk rating framework under which we employ a consistent process for assessing the credit quality of our loan portfolio. We evaluate each borrower and loan facility in our loan portfolio and assign internal borrower and loan facility risk ratings based on consideration of a number of quantitative and qualitative factors. We categorize loans in our portfolio based on our internally assigned borrower risk ratings, which are intended to assess the general creditworthiness of the borrower and probability of default. Our borrower risk ratings align with the U.S. federal banking regulatory agencies’ credit risk definitions of pass and criticized categories, with the criticized category further segmented among special mention, substandard and doubtful. Pass ratings reflect relatively low probability of default, while criticized ratings have a higher probability of default. Our internally assigned borrower risk ratings serve as the primary credit quality indicator for our loan portfolio. Because our internal borrower risk ratings provide important information on the probability of default, they are a key input in determining our allowance for credit losses.

We use our internal risk ratings to measure the credit risk of each borrower and loan facility, identify or confirm problem or potential problem loans in a timely manner, differentiate risk within each of our portfolio segments, assess the overall credit quality of our loan portfolio and manage overall risk levels. Our internally assigned borrower risk ratings, which we map to equivalent credit ratings by external credit rating agencies, serve as the primary credit quality indicator for our loan portfolio. Because our internal borrower risk ratings provide important information on the probability of default, they are a key input in estimating our allowance for credit losses.

Criticized loans decreased by $392 million to $494 million as of May 31, 2022, from $886 million as of May 31, 2021, representing approximately 2% and 3% of total loans outstanding as of each respective date. The accesseddecrease in criticized loans was primarily attributable to positive developments during the third quarter of fiscal year 2022 related to Rayburn that resulted in an improvement in Rayburn’s credit risk profile and also a significant reduction in loans outstanding to Rayburn. Loans outstanding to Rayburn totaled $167 million as of May 31, 2022, and Rayburn’s borrower risk rating was in the pass category. In comparison, loans outstanding to Rayburn totaled $379 million as of May 31, 2021, and Rayburn’s borrower risk rating was in the criticized category.

In February 2022, Rayburn successfully completed a securitization transaction to cover extraordinary costs and expenses incurred during the February 2021 polar vortex pursuant to a financing program enacted into law by Texas in June 2021 for qualifying electric cooperatives exposed to elevated power costs during the February 2021 polar vortex. Subsequent to the completion of the securitization transaction, Rayburn fully paid its outstanding obligations to ERCOT. As a result, we revised our borrower risk rating for Rayburn to a rating in the pass category from a previous rating in the criticized category. In addition, we received loan payments from Rayburn during the third quarter of fiscal year 2022 that reduced loans outstanding to Rayburn to $167 million as of May 31, 2022, from $379 million as of May 31, 2021. Rayburn was current on all of its debt obligations to us as of the date of this Report. Also, each of the borrowers with loans outstanding in the criticized category, with the exception of Brazos and Brazos Sandy Creek, was current with regard to all principal and


64


interest amounts due to us as of May 31, 2022. In comparison, each of the borrowers with loans outstanding in the criticized category, with the exception of Brazos, was current with regard to all principal and interest amounts due to us as of May 31, 2021. As discussed above under “Nonperforming Loans,” Brazos is not permitted to make scheduled loan payments without approval of the bankruptcy court and Brazos Sandy Creek’s loan outstanding of $28 million was delinquent as of May 31, 2022 and on nonaccrual status as of this date, as a result of its bankruptcy filing.

We provide additional information on our borrower risk rating classifications, including the amount of $3loans outstanding in each of the criticized loan categories of special mention, substandard and doubtful, in “Note 1—Summary of Significant
Accounting Policies” and “Note 4—Loans” in this Report.

Allowance for Credit Losses

We are required to maintain an allowance based on a current estimate of credit losses that are expected to occur over the remaining contractual term of the loans in our portfolio. Our allowance for credit losses consists of a collective allowance and an asset-specific allowance. The collective allowance is established for loans in our portfolio that share similar risk characteristics and are therefore evaluated on a collective, or pool, basis in measuring expected credit losses. The asset-specific allowance is established for loans in our portfolio that do not share similar risk characteristics with other loans in our portfolio and are therefore evaluated on an individual basis in measuring expected credit losses.

Table 19 presents, by legal entity and member class, loans outstanding and the related allowance for credit losses and allowance coverage ratio as of May 31, 2022 and 2021 and the allowance components as of each date.

Table 19: Allowance for Credit Losses by Borrower Member Class and Evaluation Methodology
 May 31,
20222021
(Dollars in thousands)
Loans Outstanding(1)
Allowance for Credit Losses
Allowance Coverage Ratio (2)
Loans Outstanding (1)
Allowance for Credit Losses
Allowance Coverage Ratio (2)
Member class:
CFC:
Distribution$23,844,242 $15,781 0.07 %$22,027,423 $13,426 0.06 %
Power supply4,901,770 47,793 0.98 5,154,312 64,646 1.25 
Statewide and associate126,863 1,251 0.99 106,121 1,391 1.31 
Total CFC28,872,875 64,825 0.22 27,287,856 79,463 0.29 
NCSC710,878 1,449 0.20 706,868 1,374 0.19 
RTFC467,601 1,286 0.28 420,383 4,695 1.12 
Total$30,051,354 $67,560 0.22 $28,415,107 $85,532 0.30 
Allowance components:
Collective allowance$29,814,380 $28,876 0.10 %$28,167,639 $42,442 0.15 %
Asset-specific allowance236,974 38,684 16.32 247,468 43,090 17.41 
Total$30,051,354 $67,560 0.22 $28,415,107 $85,532 0.30 
Allowance coverage ratios:
Nonperforming and nonaccrual loans (3)
$227,790 29.66 %$237,497 36.01 %
___________________________
(1) Represents the unpaid principal balance, net of charge-offs and recoveries, of loans as of each period-end. Excludes unamortized deferred loan origination costs of $12 million as of both May 31, 20192022 and 2021.
(2)Calculated based on the allowance for credit losses attributable to each member class and allowance components at period-end divided by the related loans outstanding at period-end.
(3)Calculated based on the total allowance for credit losses at period-end divided by loans outstanding classified as nonperforming and on nonaccrual status at period-end.



65


Our allowance for credit losses and allowance coverage ratio decreased to $68 million and 0.22%, respectively, as of May 31, 2018 relates2022, from $86 million and 0.30% respectively, as of May 31, 2021. The $18 million decrease in the allowance for credit losses reflected a decrease in the collective and asset-specific allowance of $14 million and $4 million, respectively. The collective allowance decrease of $14 million was attributable to lettersan improvement in Rayburn’s credit risk profile following the successful completion by Rayburn of a securitization transaction in February 2022 to cover extraordinary costs and expenses incurred during the February 2021 polar vortex and subsequent payment in full of its obligations to ERCOT and a significant reduction in loans outstanding to Rayburn due to payments received from Rayburn during fiscal year 2022. The asset-specific allowance decrease of $4 million stemmed from the combined impact of the elimination of an asset-specific allowance attributable to nonperforming loans totaling $9 million that were paid in full during the second quarter of fiscal year 2022 and the decrease of an asset-specific allowance for a nonperforming CFC power supply borrower, attributable to loan payments received on this loan, partially offset by the addition of an asset-specific allowance for Brazos Sandy Creek, due to its bankruptcy filing, as discussed above under Nonperforming Loans.

As a result of Rayburn’s payment in full of its February 2021 polar vortex-related outstanding obligations to ERCOT, we believe our exposure to the significant adverse financial impact on some electric utilities from the surge in wholesale power costs in Texas during the February 2021 polar vortex is now limited to loans outstanding to Brazos and its wholly-owned subsidiary Brazos Sandy Creek.

We discuss our methodology for estimating the allowance for credit issuedlosses under the CECL model in “Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies—Allowance for Credit Losses” and provide information on the management judgment and uncertainties involved in our determining the allowance for credit losses in above section “Critical Accounting Estimates—Allowance for Credit Losses” of this Report. We provide additional information on our loans and allowance for credit losses under “Note 4—Loans” and “Note 5—Allowance for Credit Losses” of this Report.

Counterparty Credit Risk

In addition to credit exposure from our borrowers, we enter into other types of financial transactions in the ordinary course of business that expose us to counterparty credit risk, primarily related to transactions involving our cash and cash equivalents, securities held in our investment securities portfolio and derivatives. We mitigate our risk by only entering into these transactions with counterparties with investment-grade ratings, establishing operational guidelines and counterparty exposure limits and monitoring our counterparty credit risk position. We evaluate our counterparties based on certain quantitative and qualitative factors and periodically assign internal risk rating grades to our counterparties.

Cash and Investments Securities Counterparty Credit Exposure

Our cash and cash equivalents and investment securities totaled $154 million and $600 million, respectively, as of May 31, 2022. The primary credit exposure associated with investments held in our investments portfolio is that issuers will not repay principal and interest in accordance with the contractual terms. Our cash and cash equivalents with financial institutions generally have an original maturity of less than one year and pursuant to our investment policy guidelines, all fixed-income debt securities, at the five-year linetime of purchase, must be rated at least investment grade based on external credit agreement.ratings from at least two of the leading global credit rating agencies, when available, or the corresponding equivalent, when not available. We therefore believe that the risk of default by these counterparties is low.
(2)The committed facilities under the Guaranteed Underwriter Program are not revolving.
(3)Availability subject to market conditions.


We believeprovide additional information on the holdings in our investment securities portfolio below under “Liquidity Risk—Investment Securities Portfolio” and in “Note 3—Investment Securities.”

Derivative Counterparty Credit Exposure

Our derivative counterparty credit exposure relates principally to interest-rate swap contracts. We generally engage in OTC derivative transactions, which expose us to individual counterparty credit risk because these transactions are executed and settled directly between us and each counterparty. We are exposed to the risk that an individual derivative counterparty will default on payments due to us, which we may not be able to collect or which may require us to seek a replacement derivative from a different counterparty. This replacement may be at a higher cost, or we may be unable to find a suitable replacement.



66


We manage our derivative counterparty credit exposure by executing derivative transactions with financial institutions that have sufficient liquidityinvestment-grade credit ratings and maintaining enforceable master netting arrangements with these counterparties, which allow us to net derivative assets and liabilities with the same counterparty. We had 12 active derivative counterparties with credit ratings ranging from Aa1 to Baa1 and Aa2 to Baa2 by Moody’s as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, and from AA- to A- by S&P as of both May 31, 2022 and 2021. The total outstanding notional amount of derivatives with these counterparties was $8,062 million and $8,979 million as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The highest single derivative counterparty concentration, by outstanding notional amount, accounted for approximately 24% of the available on-total outstanding notional amount of our derivatives as of both May 31, 2022 and off-balance sheet liquidity sources presented above2021.

While our derivative agreements include netting provisions that allow for offsetting of all contracts with a given counterparty in Table 28the event of default by one of the two parties, we report the fair value of our derivatives on a gross basis by individual contract as either a derivative asset or derivative liability on our consolidated balance sheets. However, we estimate our exposure to credit loss on our derivatives by calculating the replacement cost to settle at current market prices, as defined in our derivative agreements, all outstanding derivatives in a net gain position at the counterparty level where a right of legal offset exists. As indicated in “Note 10—Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities—Impact of Derivatives on Consolidated Balance Sheets,” our abilityoutstanding derivatives, at the individual counterparty level, were in a net gain position of $94 million as of May 31, 2022. In comparison, our outstanding derivatives, at the individual counterparty level, were in a net loss position of $464 million as of May 31, 2021; as such, we did not have exposure to issue debt to meet demand for member loan advances and satisfycredit loss on our obligations to repay long-term debt maturing over the next 12 months.outstanding derivatives as of this date.





Borrowing Capacity Under Current Facilities

Following isWe provide additional detail on our derivative agreements, including a discussion of derivative contracts with credit rating triggers and settlement amounts that would be required in the event of a ratings trigger, in “Note 10—Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.”

See “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in this Report for additional information about credit risks related to our borrowing capacitybusiness.
LIQUIDITY RISK

We define liquidity as the ability to convert assets into cash quickly and key termsefficiently, maintain access to available funding and roll over or issue new debt under normal operating conditions underand periods of CFC-specific and/or market stress, to ensure that we can meet borrower loan requests, pay current and future obligations and fund our revolving line of credit agreements with banks and committed loan facilities under the Guaranteed Underwriter Program and revolving note purchase agreements with Farmer Mac.operations in a cost-effective manner.

Committed Bank Revolving Line of Credit Agreements—Unsecured


Our primary sources of funds include member loan principal repayments, securities held in our investment portfolio, committed bank revolving lines of credit, may be used for general corporate purposes; however, we generally rely on them as a backup source of liquidity for our member and dealer commercial paper. We had $2,975 million of commitments under committed bank revolving line of credit agreements as of May 31, 2019. Under our current committed bank revolving line of credit agreements, we have the ability to request up to $300 million of letters of credit, which would result in a reduction in the remaining available amount under the facilities.

On November 28, 2018, we amended the three-year and five-year committed bank revolving line of credit agreements to extend the maturity dates to November 28, 2021 and November 28, 2023, respectively, and to terminate certain third-party bank commitments totaling $53 million under the three-year agreement and $57 million under the five- year agreement. As a result, the total commitment amount from third-parties under the three-year facility and the five-year facility is $1,440 million and $1,535 million, respectively, resulting in a combined total commitment amount under the two facilities of $2,975 million.

Table 29 presents the total commitment, the net amount available for use and the outstanding letters of credit under our committed bank revolving line of credit agreements as of May 31, 2019. We did not have any outstanding borrowings under our bank revolving line of credit agreements as of May 31, 2019.

Table 29: Committed Bank Revolving Line of Credit Agreements
  May 31, 2019    
(Dollars in millions) Total Commitment Letters of Credit Outstanding Net Available for Advance Maturity 
Annual Facility Fee (1)
3-year agreement $1,440
 $
 $1,440
 November 28, 2021 7.5 bps
           
5-year agreement 1,535
 3
 1,532
 November 28, 2023 10 bps
Total $2,975
 $3
 $2,972
    
___________________________
(1)Facility fee based on CFC’s senior unsecured credit ratings in accordance with the established pricing schedules at the inception of the related agreement.

Our committed bank revolving line of credit agreements do not contain a material adverse change clause or rating triggers that would limit the banks’ obligations to provide funding under the terms of the agreements; however, we must be in compliance with the covenants to draw on the facilities. We have been and expect to continue to be in compliance with the covenants under our committed bank revolving line of credit agreements. As such, we could draw on these facilities to repay dealer or member commercial paper that cannot be rolled over. See “Financial Ratios” and “Debt Covenants” below for additional information, including the specific financial ratio requirements under our committed bank revolving line of credit agreements.

Guaranteed Underwriter Program Committed Facilities—Secured

Under the Guaranteed Underwriter Program, we can borrow from the Federal Financing Bank and use the proceeds to make new loans and refinance existing indebtedness. As part of the program, we pay fees, based on outstanding borrowings, supporting the USDA Rural Economic Development Loan and Grant program. The borrowings under this program are guaranteed by RUS.

On November 15, 2018, we closed on a $750 million committed loan facility (“Series N”) from the Federal Financing Bank under the Guaranteed Underwriter Program. Pursuant to this facility, we may borrow any time before July 15, 2023. Each advance is subject to quarterly amortization and a final maturity not longer than 20 years from the advance date.


During fiscal year 2019, we borrowed $625 million under our committed loan facilities with the Federal Financing Bank. We had up to $1,350 million available for access under the Guaranteed Underwriter Program, as of May 31, 2019. Of this amount, $600 million is available for advance through July 15, 2022 and $750 million is available for advance through July 15, 2023.

We are required to pledge eligible distribution system loans or power supply system loans as collateral in an amount at least equal to the total outstanding borrowings under the Guaranteed Underwriter Program. See “Consolidated Balance Sheet Analysis—Debt—Collateral Pledged” and “Note 4—Loans” for additional information on pledged collateral.

Farmer Mac Revolving Note Purchase Agreements—Secured

As indicated in Table 28, we have two revolving note purchase agreements with Farmer Mac which together allow usand proceeds from debt issuances to borrow up to $5,500 million from Farmer Mac. Under our first revolving note purchase agreement with Farmer Mac dated March 24, 2011, as amended, we can borrow, subject to market conditions, up to $5,200 million at any time through January 11, 2022,members and such date shall automatically extend on each anniversary date of the closing for an additional year, unless prior to any such anniversary date, Farmer Mac provides us with a notice that the draw period will not be extended beyond the remaining term. This revolving note purchase agreement allows us to borrow, repay and re-borrow funds at any time through maturity, as market conditions permit, provided that the outstanding principal amount at any time does not exceed the total available under the agreement. Each borrowing under the note purchase agreement is evidenced by a pricing agreement setting forth the interest rate, maturity date and other related terms as we may negotiate with Farmer Mac at the time of each such borrowing. We may select a fixed rate or variable rate at the time of each advance with a maturity as determined in the applicable pricing agreement. We had outstanding secured notes payable totaling $3,055 million and $2,791 million ascapital markets. Our primary uses of May 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, under the Farmer Mac revolving note purchase agreement of $5,200 million. We borrowed $575 million under this note purchase agreement with Farmer Mac during the year ended May 31, 2019. The available borrowing amount totaled $2,145 million as of May 31, 2019.

Under our second revolving note purchase agreement with Farmer Mac, dated July 31, 2015, as amended, we can borrow upfunds include loan advances to $300 million at any time through December 20, 2023 at a fixed spread over LIBOR. This agreement also allows us to borrow, repay and re-borrow funds at any time through maturity, provided that the outstandingmembers, principal amount at any time does not exceed the total available under the agreement. Prior to the maturity date, Farmer Mac may terminate the agreement upon 30 days written notice to us on periodic facility renewal dates, the first of which was January 31, 2019. Subsequent facility renewal dates are on each June 20 or December 20 thereafter until the maturity date. We may terminate the agreement upon 30 days written notice at any time. We did not have any outstanding notes payable under this revolving note purchase agreement with Farmer Mac as of May 31, 2019. Under the terms of the first revolving note purchase agreement with Farmer Mac described above, the $5,200 million commitment will increase to $5,500 million in the event the second revolving note purchase agreement is terminated.

Pursuant to both Farmer Mac revolving note purchase agreements, we are required to pledge eligible distribution system or power supply system loans as collateral in an amount at least equal to the total principal amount of notes outstanding. See “Consolidated Balance Sheet Analysis—Debt—Collateral Pledged” and “Note 4—Loans” for additional information on pledged collateral.

Short-Term Borrowings and Long-Term and Subordinated Debt

Additional funding is provided by short-term borrowings and issuances of long-term and subordinated debt. We rely on short-term borrowings as a source to meet our daily, near-term funding needs. Long-term and subordinated debt represents the most significant component of our funding. The issuance of long-term debt allows us to reduce our reliance on short-term borrowings and effectively manage our refinancing and interest rate risk.payments on borrowings, periodic interest settlement payments related to our derivative contracts and operating expenses.


Short-Term Borrowings


Our short-termShort-term borrowings consist of commercial paper, which we offerborrowings with an original contractual maturity of one year or less and do not include the current portion of long-term debt. Short-term borrowings increased to members and dealers, select notes and daily liquidity fund notes offered to members, and bank-bid notes and medium-term notes offered to members and dealers.



Table 30 displays the composition, by funding source, of our short-term borrowings$4,981 million as of May 31, 2019 and 2018. Member borrowings accounted for 74% of total short-term borrowings2022, from $4,582 million as of May 31, 2019, compared with 69% of total2021, primarily due to an increase in short-term borrowings as of May 31, 2018.

Table 30: Short-Term BorrowingsFunding Sources
  May 31,
  2019 2018
(Dollars in thousands)  Outstanding Amount % of Total Short-Term Borrowings  Outstanding Amount % of Total Short-Term Borrowings
Funding source:        
Members $2,663,110
 74% $2,631,644
 69%
Private placement—Farmer Mac notes payable 
 
 100,000
 3
Capital markets 944,616
 26
 1,064,266
 28
Total $3,607,726
 100% $3,795,910
 100%

Table 31 displays additional information on our short-term borrowings, including the maximum month-end and average outstanding amounts, the weighted average interest rate and the weighted average maturity, for each respective category of our short-term borrowings for fiscal years 2019, 2018 and 2017.

Table 31: Short-Term Borrowings
  May 31, 2019
(Dollars in thousands) Amount Outstanding 
Weighted- Average
Interest Rate
 Weighted-Average Maturity Maximum Month-End Outstanding Amount Average Outstanding Amount
Short-term borrowings:    
      
Commercial paper:          
Commercial paper to dealers, net of discounts $944,616
 2.46% 7 days
 $2,277,820
 $1,322,039
Commercial paper to members, at par 1,111,795
 2.52
 34 days
 1,380,324
 1,091,745
Total commercial paper 2,056,411
 2.49
 22 days
 3,209,498
 2,413,784
Select notes to members 1,023,952
 2.70
 48 days
 1,049,349
 907,490
Daily liquidity fund notes to members 298,817
 2.25
 1 day
 572,898
 407,964
Medium-term notes sold to members 228,546
 2.87
 143 days
 246,676
 237,331
Farmer Mac revolving facility 
 
 
 100,000
 3,288
Total short-term borrowings $3,607,726
 2.56
 35 days
   $3,969,857



  May 31, 2018
(Dollars in thousands) Amount Outstanding 
Weighted- Average
Interest Rate
 Weighted-Average Maturity Maximum Month-End Outstanding Amount Average Outstanding Amount
Short-term borrowings:          
Commercial paper:          
Commercial paper to dealers, net of discounts $1,064,266
 1.87% 14 days $2,548,147
 $942,931
Commercial paper to members, at par 1,202,105
 1.89
 34 days 1,268,515
 1,005,624
Total commercial paper 2,266,371
 1.88
 25 days 3,447,274
 1,948,555
Select notes to members 780,472
 2.04
 44 days 780,472
 727,313
Daily liquidity fund notes to members 400,635
 1.50
 1 day 866,065
 618,705
Medium-term notes sold to members 248,432
 1.90
 150 days 248,432
 217,122
Farmer Mac revolving facility 100,000
 2.23
 61 days 100,000
 548
Total short-term borrowings $3,795,910
 1.88
 35 days   $3,512,243
  May 31, 2017
(Dollars in thousands) Amount Outstanding 
Weighted- Average
Interest Rate
 Weighted-Average Maturity Maximum Month-End Outstanding Amount Average Outstanding Amount
Short-term borrowings:          
Commercial paper:          
Commercial paper to dealers, net of discounts $999,691
 0.93% 13 days $2,048,954
 $988,538
Commercial paper to members, at par 928,158
 0.95
 24 days 1,080,737
 928,082
Total commercial paper 1,927,849
 0.94
 18 days 3,006,148
 1,916,620
Select notes to members 696,889
 1.12
 43 days 840,990
 726,276
Daily liquidity fund notes to members 527,990
 0.80
 1 day 687,807
 542,188
Medium-term notes sold to members 190,172
 1.50
 144 days 203,246
 194,045
Total short-term borrowings $3,342,900
 0.99
 28 days   $3,379,129

Our short-term borrowings totaled $3,608 millionmember investments, and accounted for 14%17% of total debt outstanding as of May 31, 2019, compared with $3,796 million, or 15%, of total debt outstanding as of May 31, 2018. The weighted-average maturityeach respective date. See “Liquidity Risk” below and weighted-average cost“Note 6—Short-Term Borrowings” for information on the composition of our short-term borrowings was 35 days and 2.56%, respectively, as of May 31, 2019, compared with 35 days and 1.88%, respectively, as of May 31, 2018. Of the total outstanding commercial paper, $945 million, or 4% of total debt outstanding, was issued to dealers as of May 31, 2019, compared with the $1,064 million, or 4% of total debt outstanding, that was issued to dealers as of May 31, 2018. Our intent is to manage our short-term wholesale funding risk by maintaining outstanding dealer commercial paper at an amount below $1,250 million for the foreseeable future. Member borrowings accounted for 74% of our total short-term borrowings as of May 31, 2019, compared with 69% of total short-term borrowings as of May 31, 2018.borrowings.


Long-Term and Subordinated Debt


Long-term debt, defined as debt with an original contractual maturity term of greater than one year, primarily consists of medium-term notes, collateral trust bonds, notes payable under the Guaranteed Underwriter Program and notes payable under our Farmer Mac revolving note purchase agreement. Subordinated debt consists of subordinated deferrable debt and members’ subordinated certificates. Our subordinated deferrable debt and members’ subordinated certificates have original contractual maturity terms of greater than one year.

Long-term and subordinated debt of $23,766 million and $22,844 million as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, accounted for 83% of total debt outstanding as of each respective date. We provide additional information on our long-term debt below under the section “Liquidity Risk” and “Note 7—Long-Term Debt” and “Note 8—Subordinated Deferrable Debt” in this Report.









53


Equity

Table 13 presents the components of total CFC equity and total equity as of May 31, 2022 and 2021.

Table 13: Equity
May 31,Change
(Dollars in thousands)20222021
Equity components:
Membership fees and educational fund:
Membership fees$970 $968 $
Educational fund2,417 2,157 260 
Total membership fees and educational fund3,387 3,125 262 
Patronage capital allocated954,988 923,970 31,018 
Members’ capital reserve1,062,286 909,749 152,537 
Total allocated equity2,020,661 1,836,844 183,817 
Unallocated net income (loss):
Prior fiscal year-end cumulative derivative forward value losses(1)
(461,162)(1,079,739)618,577 
Year-to-date derivative forward value gains(1)
553,525 618,577 (65,052)
Period-end cumulative derivative forward value gains (losses)(1)
92,363 (461,162)553,525 
Other unallocated net loss(709)(709)— 
Unallocated net income (loss)91,654 (461,871)553,525 
CFC retained equity2,112,315 1,374,973 737,342 
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)2,258 (25)2,283 
Total CFC equity2,114,573 1,374,948 739,625 
Noncontrolling interests27,396 24,931 2,465 
Total equity$2,141,969 $1,399,879 $742,090 
____________________________
(1)Represents derivative forward value gains (losses) for CFC only, as total CFC equity does not include the noncontrolling interests of the variable interest entities NCSC and RTFC, which we are required to consolidate. We present the consolidated total derivative forward value gains (losses) in Table 37 in the “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” section below. Also, see “Note 16—Business Segments” for the statements of operations for CFC.

The increase in total equity of $742 million to $2,142 million as of May 31, 2022 was attributable to our reported net income of $799 million for fiscal year 2022, partially offset by the CFC Board of Directors’ authorized patronage capital retirement in July 2021 of $58 million.

Allocation and Retirement of Patronage Capital

We are subject to District of Columbia law governing cooperatives, under which CFC is required to make annual allocations of net earnings, if any, in accordance with the provisions of the District of Columbia statutes. District of Columbia cooperative law requires cooperatives to allocate net earnings to patrons, to a general reserve in an amount sufficient to maintain a balance of at least 50% of paid-up capital and to a cooperative educational fund, as well as permits additional allocations to board-approved reserves. District of Columbia cooperative law also requires that a cooperative’s net earnings be allocated to all patrons in proportion to their individual patronage and each patron’s allocation be distributed to the patron unless the patron agrees that the cooperative may retain its share as additional capital. Pursuant to these provisions, the CFC Board of Directors is required to make annual allocations of net earnings, if any. CFC’s net earnings for determining allocations is based on non-GAAP adjusted net income, which excludes the impact of derivative forward value gains (losses). We provide a reconciliation of our adjusted net income to our reported net income and an explanation of the adjustments below in “Non-GAAP Financial Measures.”



54


In May 2022, the CFC Board of Directors authorized the allocation of $1 million of net earnings for fiscal year 2022 to the cooperative educational fund. In July 2022, the CFC Board of Directors authorized the allocation of fiscal year 2022 adjusted net income follows: $89 million to members in the form of patronage capital and $153 million to the members’ capital reserve. In July 2022, the CFC Board of Directors also authorized the retirement of patronage capital totaling $59 million, of which $44 million represented 50% of the patronage capital allocation for fiscal year 2022 and $15 million represented the portion of the allocation from fiscal year 1997 net earnings that has been held for 25 years pursuant to the CFC Board of Directors’ policy. We expect to return the authorized patronage capital retirement amount of $59 million to members in cash in the second quarter of fiscal year 2023. The remaining portion of the patronage capital allocation for fiscal year 2022 will be retained by CFC for 25 years pursuant to the guidelines adopted by the CFC Board of Directors in June 2009.

In May 2021, the CFC Board of Directors authorized the allocation of $1 million of net earnings for fiscal year 2021 to the cooperative educational fund. In July 2021 the CFC Board of Directors authorized the allocation of fiscal year 2021 adjusted net income as follows: $90 million to members in the form of patronage capital and $102 million to the members’ capital reserve. In July 2021, the CFC Board of Directors also authorized the retirement of patronage capital totaling $58 million, of which $45 million represented 50% of the patronage capital allocation for fiscal year 2021 and $13 million represented the portion of the allocation from fiscal year 1996 net earnings that has been held for 25 years pursuant to the CFC Board of Directors’ policy. This amount was returned to members in cash in September 2021. The remaining portion of the patronage capital allocation for fiscal year 2021 will be retained by CFC for 25 years pursuant to the guidelines adopted by the CFC Board of Directors in June 2009.

The CFC Board of Directors is required to make annual allocations of adjusted net income, if any. CFC has made annual retirements of allocated net earnings in 42 of the last 43 fiscal years; however, future retirements of allocated amounts are determined based on CFC’s financial condition. The CFC Board of Directors has the authority to change the current practice for allocating and retiring net earnings at any time, subject to applicable laws.

ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT

Overview

We face a variety of risks that can significantly affect our financial performance, liquidity, reputation and ability to meet the expectations of our members, investors and other stakeholders. As a financial services company, the major categories of risk exposures inherent in our business activities include credit risk, liquidity risk, market risk and operational risk. These risk categories are summarized below.

Credit risk is the risk that a borrower or other counterparty will be unable to meet its obligations in accordance with agreed-upon terms.

Liquidity risk is the risk that we will be unable to fund our operations and meet our contractual obligations or that we will be unable to fund new loans to borrowers at a reasonable cost and tenor in a timely manner.

Market risk is the risk that changes in market variables, such as movements in interest rates, may adversely affect the match between the timing of the contractual maturities, re-pricing and prepayments of our financial assets and the related financial liabilities funding those assets.

Operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal controls, processes, systems, human error or external events, including natural disasters or public health emergencies, such as the current COVID-19 pandemic. Operational risk also includes cybersecurity risk, compliance risk, fiduciary risk, reputational risk and litigation risk.

Effective risk management is critical to our overall operations and to achieving our primary objective of providing cost-based financial products to our rural electric members while maintaining the sound financial results required for investment-grade credit ratings on our rated debt instruments. Accordingly, we have a risk-management framework that is intended to govern the principal risks we face in conducting our business and the aggregate amount of risk we are willing to accept, referred to as risk appetite and risk guidelines, in the context of CFC’s mission and strategic objectives and initiatives.


55


Risk-Management Framework

Our Enterprise Risk Management (“ERM”) framework consists of a defined policy and process for measuring, assessing and responding to key risks in alignment with CFC’s mission and CFC’s Board of Director’s strategic objectives. The board of directors has responsibility for the oversight and strategic direction of the ERM framework and has adopted a comprehensive risk-management policy that describes the roles and responsibilities of the board and management within this framework for identifying and managing risks. In fulfilling its risk-management oversight duties, the board of directors receives periodic reports on business activities and risk-management activities from management. Throughout the year at its periodic meetings, the CFC Board of Directors reviews important trends and emerging developments across key risks as assessed, measured and evaluated by management. The board also establishes CFC’s loan policies and has established a Loan Committee of the board comprising no fewer than 10 directors that reviews the performance of the loan portfolio in accordance with those policies. For additional information about the role of the CFC Board of Directors in risk governance and oversight, see “Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.”

Management is primarily accountable for execution of the ERM responsibilities and daily management of the risks associated with our business. Management executes its responsibility by establishing processes for identifying, measuring, assessing, managing, monitoring and reporting risks. Management also is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal controls to mitigate key risks. We have a number of management-level risk oversight committees across the organization and groups within the organization that have a defined set of authorities and responsibilities specific to one or more risk types, including the Corporate Credit Committee, Asset Liability Committee, Investment Management Committee, and Disclosure Committee. Management provides reports to the board of directors at each regularly scheduled board meeting, and more frequently as requested by the board of directors, relating to, among other things, the ongoing progress of managing risk at CFC given the ERM framework; management’s responses for the critical business risks identified during the risk assessment process and the status of any gaps or deficiencies; and CFC’s risk profile and trends, as well as emerging risks and opportunities.

CREDIT RISK

Our loan portfolio, which represents the largest component of assets on our balance sheet, accounts for the substantial majority of our credit risk exposure. We also engage in certain non-lending activities that may give rise to counterparty credit risk, such as entering into derivative transactions to manage interest rate risk and purchasing investment securities.

Credit Risk Management

We manage credit risk related to our loan portfolio consistent with credit policies established by the CFC Board of Directors and through credit underwriting, approval and monitoring processes and practices adopted by management. Our board-established credit policies include guidelines regarding the types of credit products we offer, limits on credit we extend to individual borrowers, approval authorities delegated to management, and use of syndications and loan sales. We maintain an internal risk rating system in which we assign a rating to each borrower and credit facility. We review and update the risk ratings at least annually. Assigned risk ratings inform our credit approval, borrower monitoring and portfolio review processes. Our Corporate Credit Committee approves individual credit actions within its own authority and together with our Credit Risk Management group, establishes standards for credit underwriting, oversees credits deemed to be higher risk, reviews assigned risk ratings for accuracy, and monitors the overall credit quality and performance statistics of our loan portfolio.

Loan Portfolio Credit Risk

Our primary credit exposure is loans to rural electric cooperatives, which provide essential electric services to end-users, the majority of which are residential customers. We also have a limited portfolio of loans to not-for-profit and for-profit telecommunication companies. As a member-owned finance cooperative, CFC’s principal focus is to provide funding to its rural electric utility cooperative members to assist them in acquiring, constructing and operating electric distribution systems, power supply systems and related facilities. Loans outstanding to electric utility organizations totaled $29,584 million and $27,995 million as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, representing 98% and 99% of total loans outstanding as of each respective date. The remaining loans outstanding in our loan portfolio were to RTFC members,


56


affiliates and associates in the telecommunications industry sector. The substantial majority of loans to our borrowers are long-term fixed-rate loans with terms of up to 35 years. Long-term fixed-rate loans accounted for 90% of total loans outstanding as of both May 31, 2022 and 2021.

Because we lend primarily to our rural electric utility cooperative members, we have had a loan portfolio inherently subject to single-industry and single-obligor credit concentration risk since our inception in 1969. We historically, however, have experienced limited defaults and losses in our electric utility loan portfolio due to several factors. First, the majority of our electric cooperative borrowers operate in states where electric cooperatives are not subject to rate regulation. Thus, they are able to make rate adjustments to pass along increased costs to the end customer without first obtaining state regulatory approval, allowing them to cover operating costs and generate sufficient earnings and cash flows to service their debt obligations. Second, electric cooperatives face limited competition, as they tend to operate in exclusive territories not serviced by public investor-owned utilities. Third, electric cooperatives typically are consumer-owned, not-for-profit entities that provide an essential service to end-users, the majority of which are residential customers. As not-for-profit entities, rural electric cooperatives, unlike investor-owned utilities, generally are eligible to apply for assistance from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (“FEMA”) and states to help recover from major disasters or emergencies. Fourth, electric cooperatives tend to adhere to a conservative core business strategy model that has historically resulted in a relatively stable, resilient operating environment and overall strong financial performance and credit strength for the electric cooperative network. Finally, we generally lend to our members on a senior secured basis, which reduces the risk of loss in the event of a borrower default.

Below we provide information on the credit risk profile of our loan portfolio, including security provisions, credit concentration, credit quality indicators and our allowance for credit losses.

Security Provisions

Except when providing line of credit loans, we generally lend to our members on a senior secured basis. Long-term loans are generally secured on parity with other secured lenders (primarily RUS), if any, by all assets and revenue of the borrower with exceptions typical in utility mortgages. Line of credit loans are generally unsecured. In addition to the collateral pledged to secure our loans, distribution and power supply borrowers also are required to set rates charged to customers to achieve certain specified financial ratios. Table 14 presents, by legal entity and member class and by loan type, secured and unsecured loans in our loan portfolio as of May 31, 2022 and 2021. Of our total loans outstanding, 93% were secured as of both May 31, 2022 and 2021.



57


Table 14: Loans—Loan Portfolio Security Profile
May 31, 2022
(Dollars in thousands)Secured% of TotalUnsecured% of TotalTotal
Member class:
CFC:
Distribution$22,405,486 94 %$1,438,756 6 %$23,844,242 
Power supply4,455,098 91 446,6729 4,901,770 
Statewide and associate83,759 66 43,10434 126,863 
Total CFC26,944,343 93 1,928,532 7 28,872,875 
NCSC689,887 97 20,991 3 710,878 
RTFC454,985 97 12,616 3 467,601 
Total loans outstanding(1)
$28,089,215 93 $1,962,139 7 $30,051,354 
Loan type:
Long-term loans:
Fixed-rate$26,731,763 99 %$220,609 1 %$26,952,372 
Variable-rate817,866 100 2,335  820,201 
Total long-term loans27,549,629 99 222,944 1 27,772,573 
Line of credit loans539,586 24 1,739,195 76 2,278,781 
Total loans outstanding(1)
$28,089,215 93 $1,962,139 7 $30,051,354 
May 31, 2021
(Dollars in thousands)Secured% of TotalUnsecured% of TotalTotal
Member class:
CFC:
Distribution$20,702,657 94 %$1,324,766 %$22,027,423 
Power supply4,458,311 86 696,00114 5,154,312 
Statewide and associate88,004 83 18,11717 106,121 
Total CFC25,248,972 93 2,038,884 27,287,856 
NCSC662,782 94 44,086 706,868 
RTFC399,717 95 20,666 420,383 
Total loans outstanding(1)
$26,311,471 93 $2,103,636 $28,415,107 
Loan type:
Long-term loans:
Fixed-rate$25,278,805 99 %$235,961 %$25,514,766 
Variable-rate655,675 100 2,904 — 658,579 
Total long-term loans25,934,480 99 238,865 26,173,345 
Line of credit loans376,991 17 1,864,771 83 2,241,762 
Total loans outstanding(1)
$26,311,471 93 $2,103,636 $28,415,107 
____________________________
(1)Represents the unpaid principal balance, net of charge-offs and recoveries of loans as of the end of each period. Excludes unamortized deferred loan origination costs of $12 million as of both May 31, 2022 and 2021.








58


Credit Concentration

Concentrations of credit may exist when a lender has large credit exposures to single borrowers, large credit exposures to borrowers in the same industry sector or engaged in similar activities or large credit exposures to borrowers in a geographic region that would cause the borrowers to be similarly impacted by economic or other conditions in the region. As discussed above under “Credit Risk—Loan Portfolio Credit Risk,” because we lend primarily to our rural electric utility cooperative members, our loan portfolio is inherently subject to single-industry and single-obligor credit concentration risk, and loans outstanding to electric utility organizations totaled $29,584 million and $27,995 million as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, representing 98% and 99% of our total loans outstanding of each respective date.

Single-Obligor Concentration

Table 15 displays the outstanding loan exposure for our 20 largest borrowers, by legal entity and member class, as of May 31, 2022 and 2021. Our 20 largest borrowers consisted of 12 distribution systems and eight power supply systems as of May 31, 2022. In comparison, our 20 largest borrowers consisted of 10 distribution systems and 10 power supply systems as of May 31, 2021. The largest total exposure to a single borrower or controlled group represented less than 2% of total loans outstanding as of both May 31, 2022 and 2021.

Table 15: Loans—Loan Exposure to 20 Largest Borrowers
May 31,
  20222021
(Dollars in thousands)Amount% of TotalAmount% of Total
Member class:  
CFC:
Distribution$3,929,160 13 %$3,312,571 12 %
Power supply2,095,640 7 2,665,771 
Total CFC6,024,800 20 5,978,342 21 
NCSC195,001 1 203,392 
Total loan exposure to 20 largest borrowers6,219,801 21 6,181,734 22 
Less: Loans covered under Farmer Mac standby purchase commitment(316,367)(1)(308,580)(1)
Net loan exposure to 20 largest borrowers$5,903,434 20 %$5,873,154 21 %

As part of our strategy in managing credit exposure to large borrowers, we entered into a long-term standby purchase commitment agreement with Farmer Mac during fiscal year 2016. Under this agreement, we may designate certain long-term loans to be covered under the commitment, subject to approval by Farmer Mac, and in the event any such loan later goes into payment default for at least 90 days, upon request by us, Farmer Mac must purchase such loan at par value. The aggregate unpaid principal balance of designated and Farmer Mac-approved loans was $493 million and $512 million as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Loan exposure to our 20 largest borrowers covered under the Farmer Mac agreement totaled $316 million and $309 million as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, which reduced our exposure to the 20 largest borrowers to 20% and 21% as of each respective date. No loans have been put to Farmer Mac for purchase pursuant to this agreement. Our credit exposure is also mitigated by long-term loans guaranteed by RUS, which totaled $131 million and $139 million as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

Geographic Concentration

Although our organizational structure and mission results in single-industry concentration, we serve a geographically diverse group of electric and telecommunications borrowers throughout the U.S. The consolidated number of borrowers with loans outstanding totaled 883 and 892 as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, located in 49 states and the District of Columbia. Of the 883 and 892 borrowers with loans outstanding as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, 49 were electric power supply borrowers as of each respective date. Electric power supply borrowers generally require significantly more capital than electric distribution and telecommunications borrowers.



59


Texas, which had 68 and 67 borrowers with loans outstanding as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, accounted for the largest number of borrowers with loans outstanding in any one state as of each respective date, as well as the largest concentration of loan exposure in any one state. Loans outstanding to Texas-based electric utility organizations totaled $5,104 million and $4,878 million as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, and accounted for approximately 17% of total loans outstanding as of each respective date. Of the loans outstanding to Texas-based electric utility organizations, $163 million and $172 million as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, were covered by the Farmer Mac standby repurchase agreement, which reduced our credit risk exposure to Texas-based borrowers to 16% of total loans outstanding as of each respective date. Of the 49 electric power supply borrowers with loans outstanding as of May 31, 2022, eight were located in Texas.

Table 16 provides a breakdown, by state or U.S. territory, of the total number of borrowers with loans outstanding as of May 31, 2022 and 2021 and the outstanding loan exposure to borrowers in each jurisdiction as a percentage of total loans outstanding of $30,051 million and $28,415 million as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.




60


Table 16: Loans—Loan Geographic Concentration
May 31,
 20222021
U.S. State/TerritoryNumber of Borrowers% of Total Loans
Outstanding
Number of
Borrowers
% of Total Loans
Outstanding
Alabama212.37 %242.28 %
Alaska163.29 163.48 
Arizona110.95 110.80 
Arkansas212.42 202.21 
California40.12 40.12 
Colorado275.53 275.70 
Delaware30.26 30.31 
District of Columbia10.10 — — 
Florida193.65 183.84 
Georgia455.33 455.42 
Hawaii20.32 20.36 
Idaho100.41 110.40 
Illinois323.23 313.22 
Indiana403.67 393.21 
Iowa352.31 342.32 
Kansas283.78 294.13 
Kentucky232.47 232.65 
Louisiana82.49 91.95 
Maine30.07 30.08 
Maryland21.48 21.56 
Massachusetts10.20 10.21 
Michigan111.70 111.32 
Minnesota462.16 482.38 
Mississippi211.86 201.58 
Missouri445.65 465.65 
Montana230.80 250.77 
Nebraska90.10 120.10 
Nevada80.82 80.80 
New Hampshire20.36 20.30 
New Jersey20.07 20.06 
New Mexico120.17 130.20 
New York130.42 130.43 
North Carolina262.85 283.08 
North Dakota162.83 142.90 
Ohio272.10 272.18 
Oklahoma253.18 273.40 
Oregon191.24 191.27 
Pennsylvania151.75 161.78 
Rhode Island10.03 10.02 
South Carolina232.80 242.77 
South Dakota290.67 290.64 
Tennessee170.78 160.71 
Texas6817.01 6717.17 
Utah40.78 40.92 
Vermont50.16 50.18 
Virginia171.38 171.08 
Washington101.02 101.12 
West Virginia20.03 20.04 
Wisconsin241.79 231.82 
Wyoming121.04 111.08 
Total883 100.00 %892 100.00 %




61


Credit Quality Indicators

Assessing the overall credit quality of our loan portfolio and measuring our credit risk is an ongoing process that involves tracking payment status, troubled debt restructurings, nonperforming loans, charge-offs, the internal risk ratings of our borrowers and other indicators of credit risk. We monitor and subject each borrower and loan facility in our loan portfolio to an individual risk assessment based on quantitative and qualitative factors. Payment status trends and internal risk ratings are indicators, among others, of the probability of borrower default and overall credit quality of our loan portfolio. We believe the overall credit quality of our loan portfolio remained strong as of May 31, 2022.

Troubled Debt Restructurings

We actively monitor problem loans and, from time to time, attempt to work with borrowers to manage such exposures through loan workouts or modifications that better align with the borrower’s current ability to pay. A loan restructuring or modification of terms is accounted for as a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”) if, for economic or legal reasons related to the borrower’s financial difficulties, a concession is granted to the borrower that we would not otherwise consider. TDR loans generally are initially classified as nonperforming and placed on nonaccrual status, although in many cases such loans were already classified as nonperforming prior to modification. These loans may be returned to performing status and the accrual of interest resumed if the borrower performs under the modified terms for an extended period of time, and we expect the borrower to continue to perform in accordance with the modified terms. In certain limited circumstances in which a TDR loan is current at the modification date, the loan may remain on accrual status at the time of modification.

We have not had any loan modifications that were required to be accounted for as TDRs since fiscal year 2016. Table 17 presents the outstanding amount of modified loans accounted for as TDRs in prior periods, by member class, and the performance status of these loans as of May 31, 2022 and 2021.
Table 17: Loans—Troubled Debt Restructured Loans
May 31,
20222021
(Dollars in thousands)Number of Borrowers
Outstanding Amount(1)
% of Total Loans OutstandingNumber of Borrowers
Outstanding Amount(1)
% of Total Loans Outstanding
TDR loans:
CFC—Distribution1$5,092 0.02 %1$5,379 0.02 %
RTFC14,092 0.01 14,592 0.02 
Total TDR loans2$9,184 0.03 %2$9,971 0.04 %
Performance status of TDR loans:
Performing TDR loans2$9,184 0.03 %2$9,971 0.04 %
Total TDR loans2$9,184 0.03 %2$9,971 0.04 %
____________________________
(1) Represents the unpaid principal balance net of charge-offs and recoveries as of the end of each period.

We had TDR loans outstanding to two borrowers totaling $9 million and $10 million as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, consisting of loan modifications to a CFC electric distribution borrower and an RTFC telecommunications borrower, which at the time of the modification, were experiencing financial difficulty. Since the modification date, the loans have been performing in accordance with the terms of their respective restructured loan agreement for an extended period of time and were classified as performing and on accrual status as of May 31, 2022 and 2021. We did not have any TDR loans classified as nonperforming as of May 31, 2022 or May 31, 2021. Although TDR loans may be returned to performing status if the borrower performs under the modified terms of the loan for an extended period of time, we evaluate TDR loans on an individual basis in measuring expected credit losses for these loans.






62


Nonperforming Loans

In addition to TDR loans that may be classified as nonperforming, we also may have nonperforming loans that have not been modified as a TDR. We classify such loans as nonperforming at the earlier of the date when we determine: (i) interest or principal payments on the loan is past due 90 days or more; (ii) as a result of court proceedings, the collection of interest or principal payments based on the original contractual terms is not expected; or (iii) the full and timely collection of interest or principal is otherwise uncertain. Once a loan is classified as nonperforming, we generally place the loan on nonaccrual status. Interest accrued but not collected at the date a loan is placed on nonaccrual status is reversed against earnings. Table 18 presents the outstanding balance of nonperforming loans, by member class, as of May 31, 2022 and 2021.

Table 18: Loans—Nonperforming Loans
May 31,
 20222021
(Dollars in thousands)Number of Borrowers
Outstanding Amount (1)
% of Total Loans OutstandingNumber of Borrowers
Outstanding Amount (1)
% of Total Loans Outstanding
Nonperforming loans:  
CFC—Power supply(2)
3$227,790 0.76 %2$228,312 0.81 %
RTFC—   29,185 0.03 
Total nonperforming loans3$227,790 0.76 %4$237,497 0.84 %
____________________________
(1) Represents the unpaid principal balance net of charge-offs and recoveries as of the end of each period.
(2) In addition, we had less than $1 million in letters of credit outstanding to Brazos as of May 31, 2021.

We had loans to three borrowers totaling $228 million classified as nonperforming as of May 31, 2022. In comparison, we had loans to four borrowers totaling $237 million classified as nonperforming as of May 31, 2021. Nonperforming loans represented 0.76% and 0.84% of total loans outstanding as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The reduction in nonperforming loans of $9 million during the current fiscal year was due in part to our receipt of full payment of all amounts due on nonperforming loans to two RTFC borrowers totaling $9 million during the second quarter of fiscal year 2022. In addition, we have continued to receive payments on the remaining outstanding nonperforming loan to a CFC electric power supply borrower, including payments of $29 million during the current fiscal year, which reduced the balance of this loan to $114 million as of May 31, 2022, from $143 million as of May 31, 2021. These reductions were partially offset by the classification during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2022 of the $28 million loan outstanding to Brazos Sandy Creek as nonperforming following its bankruptcy filing, as discussed below.

Loans outstanding to Brazos, which filed for bankruptcy in March 2021 due to its exposure to elevated wholesale electric power costs during the February 2021 polar vortex, accounted for $86 million and $85 million of our total nonperforming loans as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Brazos is not permitted to make scheduled loan payments without approval of the bankruptcy court. As a result, we have not received payments from Brazos since March 2021, and its loans outstanding were delinquent as of each respective date.

On March 18, 2022, Brazos Sandy Creek, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Brazos and a CFC Texas-based electric power supply borrower, filed for bankruptcy following the filing of a motion by Brazos to reject its power purchase agreement with Brazos Sandy Creek as part of Brazos’ bankruptcy proceedings. A Chapter 7 Trustee has been appointed, and the Chapter 7 Trustee has been approved by the bankruptcy court to operate Brazos Sandy Creek as a going concern. CFC had a secured loan outstanding to Brazos Sandy Creek totaling $28 million as of May 31, 2022, which, upon notification of the bankruptcy filing by Brazos Sandy Creek, was classified as nonperforming during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2022. Brazos Sandy Creek’s loan outstanding of $28 million was delinquent as of May 31, 2022 and on nonaccrual status as of this date. Aggregate loans outstanding to Brazos and Brazos Sandy Creek totaled $114 million as of May 31, 2022, of which $49 million were secured and $65 million were unsecured.

Net Charge-Offs

Charge-offs represent the amount of a loan that has been removed from our consolidated balance sheet when the loan is deemed uncollectible. Generally the amount of a charge-off is the recorded investment in excess of the fair value of the


63


expected cash flows from the loan, or, if the loan is collateral dependent, the fair value of the underlying collateral securing the loan. We report charge-offs net of amounts recovered on previously charged off loans. We had no loan charge-offs during fiscal years 2022, 2021 or 2020. Prior to Brazos’ and Brazos Sandy Creek’s bankruptcy filings, we had not experienced any defaults or charge-offs in our electric utility and telecommunications loan portfolios since fiscal year 2013 and 2017, respectively.

In our 53-year history, we have experienced only 18 defaults in our electric utility loan portfolio, which includes our most recent defaults by Brazos and Brazos Sandy Creek due to their bankruptcy filing in March 2021 and March 2022, respectively. Of the 16 defaults prior to Brazos and Brazos Sandy Creek, one remains unresolved with an expected ultimate resolution date in calendar year 2025, nine resulted in no loss and six resulted in cumulative net charge-offs of $86 million. Of this amount, $67 million was attributable to five electric power supply cooperatives and $19 million was attributable to one electric distribution cooperative. We cite the factors that have historically contributed to the relatively low risk of default by our electric utility cooperatives, our principal lending market, above under “Credit Risk—Loan Portfolio Credit Risk.”

In comparison, since inception in 1987, we have experienced 15 defaults and cumulative net charge-offs of $427 million in our telecommunications loan portfolio, the most significant of which was a charge-off of $354 million in fiscal year 2011.

Borrower Risk Ratings

As part of our management of credit risk, we maintain a credit risk rating framework under which we employ a consistent process for assessing the credit quality of our loan portfolio. We evaluate each borrower and loan facility in our loan portfolio and assign internal borrower and loan facility risk ratings based on consideration of a number of quantitative and qualitative factors. We categorize loans in our portfolio based on our internally assigned borrower risk ratings, which are intended to assess the general creditworthiness of the borrower and probability of default. Our borrower risk ratings align with the U.S. federal banking regulatory agencies’ credit risk definitions of pass and criticized categories, with the criticized category further segmented among special mention, substandard and doubtful. Pass ratings reflect relatively low probability of default, while criticized ratings have a higher probability of default. Our internally assigned borrower risk ratings serve as the primary credit quality indicator for our loan portfolio. Because our internal borrower risk ratings provide important information on the probability of default, they are a key input in determining our allowance for credit losses.

We use our internal risk ratings to measure the credit risk of each borrower and loan facility, identify or confirm problem or potential problem loans in a timely manner, differentiate risk within each of our portfolio segments, assess the overall credit quality of our loan portfolio and manage overall risk levels. Our internally assigned borrower risk ratings, which we map to equivalent credit ratings by external credit rating agencies, serve as the primary credit quality indicator for our loan portfolio. Because our internal borrower risk ratings provide important information on the probability of default, they are a key input in estimating our allowance for credit losses.

Criticized loans decreased by $392 million to $494 million as of May 31, 2022, from $886 million as of May 31, 2021, representing approximately 2% and 3% of total loans outstanding as of each respective date. The decrease in criticized loans was primarily attributable to positive developments during the third quarter of fiscal year 2022 related to Rayburn that resulted in an improvement in Rayburn’s credit risk profile and also a significant reduction in loans outstanding to Rayburn. Loans outstanding to Rayburn totaled $167 million as of May 31, 2022, and Rayburn’s borrower risk rating was in the pass category. In comparison, loans outstanding to Rayburn totaled $379 million as of May 31, 2021, and Rayburn’s borrower risk rating was in the criticized category.

In February 2022, Rayburn successfully completed a securitization transaction to cover extraordinary costs and expenses incurred during the February 2021 polar vortex pursuant to a financing program enacted into law by Texas in June 2021 for qualifying electric cooperatives exposed to elevated power costs during the February 2021 polar vortex. Subsequent to the completion of the securitization transaction, Rayburn fully paid its outstanding obligations to ERCOT. As a result, we revised our borrower risk rating for Rayburn to a rating in the pass category from a previous rating in the criticized category. In addition, we received loan payments from Rayburn during the third quarter of fiscal year 2022 that reduced loans outstanding to Rayburn to $167 million as of May 31, 2022, from $379 million as of May 31, 2021. Rayburn was current on all of its debt obligations to us as of the date of this Report. Also, each of the borrowers with loans outstanding in the criticized category, with the exception of Brazos and Brazos Sandy Creek, was current with regard to all principal and


64


interest amounts due to us as of May 31, 2022. In comparison, each of the borrowers with loans outstanding in the criticized category, with the exception of Brazos, was current with regard to all principal and interest amounts due to us as of May 31, 2021. As discussed above under “Nonperforming Loans,” Brazos is not permitted to make scheduled loan payments without approval of the bankruptcy court and Brazos Sandy Creek’s loan outstanding of $28 million was delinquent as of May 31, 2022 and on nonaccrual status as of this date, as a result of its bankruptcy filing.

We provide additional information on our borrower risk rating classifications, including the amount of loans outstanding in each of the criticized loan categories of special mention, substandard and doubtful, in “Note 1—Summary of Significant
Accounting Policies” and “Note 4—Loans” in this Report.

Allowance for Credit Losses

We are required to maintain an allowance based on a current estimate of credit losses that are expected to occur over the remaining contractual term of the loans in our portfolio. Our allowance for credit losses consists of a collective allowance and an asset-specific allowance. The collective allowance is established for loans in our portfolio that share similar risk characteristics and are therefore evaluated on a collective, or pool, basis in measuring expected credit losses. The asset-specific allowance is established for loans in our portfolio that do not share similar risk characteristics with other loans in our portfolio and are therefore evaluated on an individual basis in measuring expected credit losses.

Table 19 presents, by legal entity and member class, loans outstanding and the related allowance for credit losses and allowance coverage ratio as of May 31, 2022 and 2021 and the allowance components as of each date.

Table 19: Allowance for Credit Losses by Borrower Member Class and Evaluation Methodology
 May 31,
20222021
(Dollars in thousands)
Loans Outstanding(1)
Allowance for Credit Losses
Allowance Coverage Ratio (2)
Loans Outstanding (1)
Allowance for Credit Losses
Allowance Coverage Ratio (2)
Member class:
CFC:
Distribution$23,844,242 $15,781 0.07 %$22,027,423 $13,426 0.06 %
Power supply4,901,770 47,793 0.98 5,154,312 64,646 1.25 
Statewide and associate126,863 1,251 0.99 106,121 1,391 1.31 
Total CFC28,872,875 64,825 0.22 27,287,856 79,463 0.29 
NCSC710,878 1,449 0.20 706,868 1,374 0.19 
RTFC467,601 1,286 0.28 420,383 4,695 1.12 
Total$30,051,354 $67,560 0.22 $28,415,107 $85,532 0.30 
Allowance components:
Collective allowance$29,814,380 $28,876 0.10 %$28,167,639 $42,442 0.15 %
Asset-specific allowance236,974 38,684 16.32 247,468 43,090 17.41 
Total$30,051,354 $67,560 0.22 $28,415,107 $85,532 0.30 
Allowance coverage ratios:
Nonperforming and nonaccrual loans (3)
$227,790 29.66 %$237,497 36.01 %
___________________________
(1) Represents the unpaid principal balance, net of charge-offs and recoveries, of loans as of each period-end. Excludes unamortized deferred loan origination costs of $12 million as of both May 31, 2022 and 2021.
(2)Calculated based on the allowance for credit losses attributable to each member class and allowance components at period-end divided by the related loans outstanding at period-end.
(3)Calculated based on the total allowance for credit losses at period-end divided by loans outstanding classified as nonperforming and on nonaccrual status at period-end.



65


Our allowance for credit losses and allowance coverage ratio decreased to $68 million and 0.22%, respectively, as of May 31, 2022, from $86 million and 0.30% respectively, as of May 31, 2021. The $18 million decrease in the allowance for credit losses reflected a decrease in the collective and asset-specific allowance of $14 million and $4 million, respectively. The collective allowance decrease of $14 million was attributable to an improvement in Rayburn’s credit risk profile following the successful completion by Rayburn of a securitization transaction in February 2022 to cover extraordinary costs and expenses incurred during the February 2021 polar vortex and subsequent payment in full of its obligations to ERCOT and a significant reduction in loans outstanding to Rayburn due to payments received from Rayburn during fiscal year 2022. The asset-specific allowance decrease of $4 million stemmed from the combined impact of the elimination of an asset-specific allowance attributable to nonperforming loans totaling $9 million that were paid in full during the second quarter of fiscal year 2022 and the decrease of an asset-specific allowance for a nonperforming CFC power supply borrower, attributable to loan payments received on this loan, partially offset by the addition of an asset-specific allowance for Brazos Sandy Creek, due to its bankruptcy filing, as discussed above under Nonperforming Loans.

As a result of Rayburn’s payment in full of its February 2021 polar vortex-related outstanding obligations to ERCOT, we believe our exposure to the significant adverse financial impact on some electric utilities from the surge in wholesale power costs in Texas during the February 2021 polar vortex is now limited to loans outstanding to Brazos and its wholly-owned subsidiary Brazos Sandy Creek.

We discuss our methodology for estimating the allowance for credit losses under the CECL model in “Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies—Allowance for Credit Losses” and provide information on the management judgment and uncertainties involved in our determining the allowance for credit losses in above section “Critical Accounting Estimates—Allowance for Credit Losses” of this Report. We provide additional information on our loans and allowance for credit losses under “Note 4—Loans” and “Note 5—Allowance for Credit Losses” of this Report.

Counterparty Credit Risk

In addition to credit exposure from our borrowers, we enter into other types of financial transactions in the ordinary course of business that expose us to counterparty credit risk, primarily related to transactions involving our cash and cash equivalents, securities held in our investment securities portfolio and derivatives. We mitigate our risk by only entering into these transactions with counterparties with investment-grade ratings, establishing operational guidelines and counterparty exposure limits and monitoring our counterparty credit risk position. We evaluate our counterparties based on certain quantitative and qualitative factors and periodically assign internal risk rating grades to our counterparties.

Cash and Investments Securities Counterparty Credit Exposure

Our cash and cash equivalents and investment securities totaled $154 million and $600 million, respectively, as of May 31, 2022. The primary credit exposure associated with investments held in our investments portfolio is that issuers will not repay principal and interest in accordance with the contractual terms. Our cash and cash equivalents with financial institutions generally have an original maturity of less than one year and pursuant to our investment policy guidelines, all fixed-income debt securities, at the time of purchase, must be rated at least investment grade based on external credit ratings from at least two of the leading global credit rating agencies, when available, or the corresponding equivalent, when not available. We therefore believe that the risk of default by these counterparties is low.

We provide additional information on the holdings in our investment securities portfolio below under “Liquidity Risk—Investment Securities Portfolio” and in “Note 3—Investment Securities.”

Derivative Counterparty Credit Exposure

Our derivative counterparty credit exposure relates principally to interest-rate swap contracts. We generally engage in OTC derivative transactions, which expose us to individual counterparty credit risk because these transactions are executed and settled directly between us and each counterparty. We are exposed to the risk that an individual derivative counterparty will default on payments due to us, which we may not be able to collect or which may require us to seek a replacement derivative from a different counterparty. This replacement may be at a higher cost, or we may be unable to find a suitable replacement.



66


We manage our derivative counterparty credit exposure by executing derivative transactions with financial institutions that have investment-grade credit ratings and maintaining enforceable master netting arrangements with these counterparties, which allow us to net derivative assets and liabilities with the same counterparty. We had 12 active derivative counterparties with credit ratings ranging from Aa1 to Baa1 and Aa2 to Baa2 by Moody’s as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, and from AA- to A- by S&P as of both May 31, 2022 and 2021. The total outstanding notional amount of derivatives with these counterparties was $8,062 million and $8,979 million as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The highest single derivative counterparty concentration, by outstanding notional amount, accounted for approximately 24% of the total outstanding notional amount of our derivatives as of both May 31, 2022 and 2021.

While our derivative agreements include netting provisions that allow for offsetting of all contracts with a given counterparty in the event of default by one of the two parties, we report the fair value of our derivatives on a gross basis by individual contract as either a derivative asset or derivative liability on our consolidated balance sheets. However, we estimate our exposure to credit loss on our derivatives by calculating the replacement cost to settle at current market prices, as defined in our derivative agreements, all outstanding derivatives in a net gain position at the counterparty level where a right of legal offset exists. As indicated in “Note 10—Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities—Impact of Derivatives on Consolidated Balance Sheets,” our outstanding derivatives, at the individual counterparty level, were in a net gain position of $94 million as of May 31, 2022. In comparison, our outstanding derivatives, at the individual counterparty level, were in a net loss position of $464 million as of May 31, 2021; as such, we did not have exposure to credit loss on our outstanding derivatives as of this date.

We provide additional detail on our derivative agreements, including a discussion of derivative contracts with credit rating triggers and settlement amounts that would be required in the event of a ratings trigger, in “Note 10—Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.”

See “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in this Report for additional information about credit risks related to our business.
LIQUIDITY RISK

We define liquidity as the ability to convert assets into cash quickly and efficiently, maintain access to available funding and roll over or issue new debt under normal operating conditions and periods of CFC-specific and/or market stress, to ensure that we can meet borrower loan requests, pay current and future obligations and fund our operations in a cost-effective manner.

Our primary sources of funds include member loan principal repayments, securities held in our investment portfolio, committed bank revolving lines of credit, committed loan facilities under Guaranteed Underwriter Program, revolving note purchase agreements with Farmer Mac and proceeds from debt issuances to members and in the capital markets. Our primary uses of funds include loan advances to members, principal and interest payments on borrowings, periodic interest settlement payments related to our derivative contracts and operating expenses.

Liquidity Risk Management

Our liquidity risk-management framework is designed to meet our liquidity objectives of providing a reliable source of funding to members, meet maturing debt and other financial obligations, issue new debt and fund our operations on a cost-effective basis under normal operating conditions as well as under CFC-specific and/or market stress conditions. We engage in various activities to manage liquidity risk and achieve our liquidity objectives. Our Asset Liability Committee establishes guidelines that are intended to ensure that we maintain sufficient, diversified sources of liquidity to cover potential funding requirements as well as unanticipated contingencies. Our Treasury group develops strategies to manage our targeted liquidity position, projects our funding needs under various scenarios, including adverse circumstances, and monitors our liquidity position on an ongoing basis.

Available Liquidity

As part of our strategy in managing liquidity risk and meeting our liquidity objectives, we seek to maintain various committed sources of funding that are available to meet our near-term liquidity needs. Table 20 presents a comparison


67


between our available liquidity, which consists of cash and cash equivalents, our debt securities investment portfolio and amounts under committed credit facilities as of May 31, 2022 and 2021.

Table 20: AvailableLiquidity
May 31,
20222021
(Dollars in millions)TotalAccessedAvailableTotalAccessedAvailable
Liquidity sources:
Cash and investment debt securities:
Cash and cash equivalents$154 $ $154 $295 $— $295 
Debt securities investment portfolio(1)
566  566 576 — 576 
Total cash and investment debt securities720  720 871  871 
Committed credit facilities:
Committed bank revolving line of credit agreements—unsecured(2)
2,600 3 2,597 2,725 2,722 
Guaranteed Underwriter Program committed facilities—secured(3)
8,723 7,648 1,075 8,173 7,198 975 
Farmer Mac revolving note purchase agreement, dated March 24, 2011, as amended—secured(4)
5,500 $3,0952,405 5,500 2,978 2,522 
Total committed credit facilities16,82310,7466,07716,39810,1796,219
Total available liquidity$17,543 $10,746 $6,797 $17,269 $10,179 $7,090 
____________________________
(1)Represents the aggregate fair value of our portfolio of debt securities as of period-end. Our portfolio of equity securities consists primarily of preferred stock securities that are not as readily redeemable; therefore, we exclude our portfolio of equity securities from our available liquidity. We had investment-grade corporate debt securities with an aggregate fair value of $211 million as of May 31, 2021 that we transferred and pledged as collateral in short-term repurchase transactions.
(2)The committed bank revolving line of credit agreements consist of a three-year and a five-year revolving line of credit agreement. The accessed amount of $3 million as of both May 31, 2022 and 2021, relates to letters of credit issued pursuant to the five-year revolving line of credit agreement.
(3)The committed facilities under the Guaranteed Underwriter Program are not revolving.
(4)Availability subject to market conditions.

Although as a non-bank financial institution we are not subject to regulatory liquidity requirements, our liquidity management framework includes monitoring our liquidity and funding positions on an ongoing basis and assessing our ability to meet our scheduled debt obligations and other cash flow requirements based on point-in-time metrics as well as forward-looking projections. Our liquidity and funding assessment takes into consideration amounts available under existing liquidity sources, the expected rollover of member short-term investments and scheduled loan principal payment amounts, as well as our continued ability to access the private placement and capital markets.

Liquidity Risk Assessment

We utilize several measures to assess our liquidity risk and ensure we have adequate coverage to meet our liquidity needs. Our primary liquidity measures indicate the extent to which we have sufficient liquidity to cover the payment of scheduled debt obligations over the next 12 months. We calculate our liquidity coverage ratios under several scenarios that take into consideration various assumptions about our near-term sources and uses of liquidity, including the assumption that maturities of member short-term investments will not have a significant impact on our anticipated cash outflows. Our members have historically maintained a stable level of short-term investments in CFC in the form of daily liquidity fund notes, commercial paper, select notes and medium-term notes. As such, we expect that our members will continue to reinvest their excess cash in short-term investment products offered by CFC.

Table 21 presents our primary liquidity coverage ratios as of May 31, 2022 and 2021 and displays the calculation of each ratio as of these respective dates based on the assumptions discussed above.



68


Table 21: Liquidity Coverage Ratios
May 31,
(Dollars in millions)20222021
Liquidity coverage ratio:(1)
Total available liquidity(2)
$6,797 $7,090 
Debt scheduled to mature over next 12 months:
Short-term borrowings4,981 4,582 
Long-term and subordinated debt scheduled to mature over next 12 months1,913 2,604 
Total debt scheduled to mature over next 12 months6,894 7,186 
Excess (deficit) in available liquidity over debt scheduled to mature over next 12 months$(97)$(96)
Liquidity coverage ratio0.990.99
Liquidity coverage ratio, excluding expected maturities of member short-term investments(3)
Total available liquidity(2)
$6,797 $7,090 
Total debt scheduled to mature over next 12 months6,894 7,186 
Exclude: Member short-term investments(3,956)(3,487)
Total debt, excluding member short-term investments, scheduled to mature over next 12 months2,938 3,699 
Excess in available liquidity over total debt, excluding member short-term investments, scheduled to mature over next 12 months$3,859 $3,391 
Liquidity coverage ratio, excluding expected maturities of member short-term investments2.311.92
___________________________
(1)Calculated based on available liquidity at period-end divided by total debt scheduled to mature over the next 12 months at period-end.
(2)Total available liquidity is presented above in Table 20.
(3)Calculated based on available liquidity at period-end divided by debt, excluding member short-term investments, scheduled to mature over the next 12 months.

Investment Securities Portfolio

We have an investment portfolio of debt securities classified as trading and equity securities, both of which are reported on our consolidated balance sheets at fair value. The aggregate fair value of the securities in our investment portfolio was $600 million as of May 31, 2022, consisting of debt securities with a fair value of $566 million and equity securities with a fair value of $34 million. In comparison, the aggregate fair value of the securities in our investment portfolio was $611 million as of May 31, 2021, consisting of debt securities with a fair value of $576 million and equity securities with a fair value of $35 million.

Our debt securities investment portfolio is intended to serve as an additional source of liquidity and is structured so that the securities generally have active secondary or resale markets under normal market conditions. The objective of the portfolio is to achieve returns commensurate with the level of risk assumed subject to CFC’s investment policy and guidelines and liquidity requirements. Pursuant to our investment policy and guidelines, all fixed-income debt securities, at the time of purchase, must be rated at least investment grade based on external credit ratings from at least two of the leading global credit rating agencies, when available, or the corresponding equivalent, when not available. Securities rated investment grade, that is those rated Baa3 or higher by Moody’s or BBB- or higher by S&P or BBB- or higher by Fitch, are generally considered by the rating agencies to be of lower credit risk than non-investment grade securities.

Under master repurchase agreements that we have with counterparties, we can obtain short-term funding by selling investment-grade corporate debt securities from our investment portfolio subject to an obligation to repurchase the same or similar securities at an agreed-upon price and date. Because we retain effective control over the transferred securities, transactions under these repurchase agreements are accounted for as collateralized financing agreements (i.e., secured borrowings) and not as a sale and subsequent repurchase of securities. The obligation to repurchase the securities is reflected


69


as a component of our short-term borrowings on our consolidated balance sheets. The aggregate fair value of debt securities underlying repurchase transactions is parenthetically disclosed on our consolidated balance sheets. We had no borrowings under repurchase transactions outstanding as of May 31, 2022; therefore, we had no debt securities in our investment portfolio pledged as collateral as of May 31, 2022. We had short-term borrowings under repurchase transactions of $200 million as of May 31, 2021. The debt securities underlying these transactions had an aggregate fair value of $211 million as of this date, and we repurchased the securities on June 2, 2021.

We provide additional information on our investment securities portfolio in “Note 3—Investment Securities” of this Report.

Borrowing Capacity Under Various Credit Facilities

The aggregate borrowing capacity under our committed bank revolving line of credit agreements, committed loan facilities under the Guaranteed Underwriter Program and revolving note purchase agreement with Farmer Mac totaled $16,823 million and $16,398 million as of May 31, 2022 and May 31, 2021, respectively, and the aggregate amount available for access totaled $6,077 million and $6,219 million as of each respective date. The following is a discussion of our borrowing capacity and key terms and conditions under each of these credit facilities.

Committed Bank Revolving Line of Credit Agreements—Unsecured

Our committed bank revolving lines of credit may be used for general corporate purposes; however, we generally rely on them as a backup source of liquidity for our member and dealer commercial paper. On June 7, 2021, we amended the three-year and five-year committed bank revolving line of credit agreements to extend the maturity dates to November 28, 2024 and November 28, 2025, respectively, and to terminate certain bank commitments totaling $70 million under the three-year agreement and $55 million under the five-year agreement. As a result, the total commitment amount under the three-year facility and the five-year facility is $1,245 million and $1,355 million, respectively, resulting in a combined total commitment amount under the two facilities of $2,600 million. Under our current committed bank revolving line of credit agreements, we have the ability to request up to $300 million of letters of credit, which would result in a reduction in the remaining available amount under the facilities.

Table 22 presents the total commitment amount under our committed bank revolving line of credit agreements, outstanding letters of credit and the amount available for access as of May 31, 2022.

Table 22: Committed Bank Revolving Line of Credit Agreements
 May 31, 2022  
(Dollars in millions)Total CommitmentLetters of Credit OutstandingAmount Available for AccessMaturity
Annual Facility Fee (1)
Bank revolving line of credit term:
3-year agreement$1,245 $ $1,245 November 28, 20247.5 bps
5-year agreement1,355 3 1,352 November 28, 202510.0 bps
Total$2,600 $3 $2,597   
___________________________
(1)Facility fee based on CFC’s senior unsecured credit ratings in accordance with the established pricing schedules at the inception of the related agreement.

We did not have any outstanding borrowings under our committed bank revolving line of credit agreements as of May 31, 2022; however, we had letters of credit outstanding of $3 million under the five-year committed bank revolving agreement as of this date.

Although our committed bank revolving line of credit agreements do not contain a material adverse change clause or rating triggers that would limit the banks’ obligations to provide funding under the terms of the agreements, we must be in compliance with the covenants to draw on the facilities. We have been and expect to continue to be in compliance with the covenants under our committed bank revolving line of credit agreements. As such, we could draw on these facilities to repay dealer or member commercial paper that cannot be rolled over.



70


Guaranteed Underwriter Program Committed Facilities—Secured

Under the Guaranteed Underwriter Program, we can borrow from the Federal Financing Bank and use the proceeds to extend new loans to our members and refinance existing member debt. As part of the program, we pay fees based on our outstanding borrowings that are intended to help fund the USDA Rural Economic Development Loan and Grant program, and thereby support additional investment in rural economic development projects. The borrowings under this program are guaranteed by RUS. Each advance is subject to quarterly amortization and a final maturity not longer than 30 years from the date of the advance.

On November 4, 2021, we closed on a committed loan facility for additional funding of $550 million (“Series S”) from the Federal Financing Bank under the Guaranteed Underwriter Program. Pursuant to this facility, we may borrow any time before July 15, 2026. Each advance is subject to quarterly amortization and a final maturity not longer than 30 years from the date of the advance. The closing of this facility increased our total committed borrowing amount under the Guaranteed Underwriter Program to $8,723 million as of May 31, 2022, from $8,173 million as of May 31, 2021.

As displayed in Table 20, we had accessed $7,648 million under the Guaranteed Underwriter Program and up to $1,075 million was available for borrowing as of May 31, 2022. Of the $1,075 million available borrowing amount, $150 million is available for advance through July 15, 2024, $375 million is available for advance through July 15, 2025 and $550 million is available for advance through July 15, 2026. We are required to pledge eligible distribution system loans or power supply system loans as collateral in an amount at least equal to our total outstanding borrowings under the Guaranteed Underwriter Program committed loan facilities, which totaled $6,105 million as of May 31, 2022.

The notes payable to FFB and guaranteed by RUS under the Guaranteed Underwriter Program contain a provision that if during any portion of the fiscal year, our senior secured credit ratings do not have at least two of the following ratings: (i) A3 or higher from Moody’s, (ii) A- or higher from S&P, (iii) A- or higher from Fitch or (iv) an equivalent rating from a successor rating agency to any of the above rating agencies, we may not make cash patronage capital distributions in excess of 5% of total patronage capital.

Farmer Mac Revolving Note Purchase Agreement—Secured

We have a revolving note purchase agreement with Farmer Mac, dated March 24, 2011, as amended, under which we can borrow up to $5,500 million from Farmer Mac, at any time, subject to market conditions through June 30, 2026 with successive automatic one-year renewals without notice by either party. Beginning June 30, 2025, the revolving note purchase agreement is subject to termination of the draw period by Farmer Mac upon 425 days’ prior written notice. Pursuant to this revolving note purchase agreement, we can borrow, repay and re-borrow funds at any time through maturity, as market conditions permit, provided that the outstanding principal amount at any time does not exceed the total available under the agreement. Each borrowing under the revolving note purchase agreement is evidenced by a pricing agreement setting forth the interest rate, maturity date and other related terms as we may negotiate with Farmer Mac at the time of each such borrowing. We may select a fixed rate or variable rate at the time of each advance with a maturity as determined in the applicable pricing agreement.

Under this agreement, we had outstanding secured notes payable totaling $3,095 million and $2,978 million as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. We borrowed $720 million in long-term notes payable under this note purchase agreement with Farmer Mac during the year ended May 31, 2022. As displayed in Table 20, the amount available for borrowing under this agreement was $2,405 million as of May 31, 2022. We are required to pledge eligible electric distribution system or electric power supply system loans as collateral in an amount at least equal to the total principal amount of notes outstanding, under this agreement.

On June 15, 2022, we amended the revolving note purchase agreement with Farmer Mac to increase the maximum borrowing availability to $6,000 million from $5,500 million, and extend the draw period from June 30, 2026 to June 30, 2027, with successive automatic one-year renewals without notice by either party, subject to the termination of the draw period by Farmer Mac upon 425 days’ prior written notice.

We provide additional information on pledged collateral below under “Pledged Collateral” in this section and in “Note 3—Investment Securities” and “Note 4—Loans.”


71


Short-Term Borrowings

Our short-term borrowings, which we rely on to meet our daily, near-term funding needs, consist of commercial paper, which we offer to members and dealers, select notes and daily liquidity fund notes offered to members, medium-term notes offered to members and dealers, and funds from repurchase secured borrowing transactions.

Table 23: Short-Term Borrowings—Outstanding Amount and Weighted-Average Interest Rates
May 31,
 20222021
(Dollars in thousands) Outstanding AmountWeighted- Average
Interest Rate
 Outstanding AmountWeighted-Average
Interest Rate
Short-term borrowings:    
Commercial paper:
Commercial paper sold through dealers, net of discounts$1,024,813 0.96 %$894,977 0.16 %
Commercial paper sold directly to members, at par1,358,069 0.92 1,124,607 0.14 
Total commercial paper2,382,882 0.94 2,019,584 0.15 
Select notes to members1,753,441 1.11 1,539,150 0.30 
Daily liquidity fund notes427,790 0.80 460,556 0.08 
Medium-term notes sold to members417,054 0.66 362,691 0.42 
Securities sold under repurchase agreements  200,115 0.30 
Total short-term borrowings outstanding$4,981,167 0.97 $4,582,096 0.22 

Short-term borrowings increased $399 million to $4,981 million as of May 31, 2022, from $4,582 million as of May 31, 2021, and accounted for 17% of total debt outstanding as of each respective date. The increase in short-term borrowings was driven primarily by an increase in short-term member investments. The weighted-average cost of our outstanding short-term borrowings increased to 0.97% as of May 31, 2022, from 0.22% as of May 31, 2021. The weighted-average maturity of our short-term borrowings increased to 42 days as of May 31, 2022, from 38 days as of May 31, 2021.

Table 24 displays our outstanding short-term borrowings, by funding source, as of May 31, 2022 and 2021.

Table 24: Short-Term Borrowings—Funding Sources
May 31,
 20222021
(Dollars in thousands) Outstanding Amount% of Total Short-Term Borrowings Outstanding Amount% of Total Short-Term Borrowings
Funding source:    
Members$3,956,354 79 %$3,487,004 76 %
Capital markets1,024,813 21 1,095,092 24 
Total$4,981,167 100 %$4,582,096 100 %

Our intent is to manage our short-term wholesale funding risk by maintaining dealer commercial paper outstanding at each quarter-end within a range of $1,000 million and $1,500 million, although the intra-period amount of dealer commercial paper outstanding may fluctuate based on our liquidity requirements. Dealer commercial paper outstanding of $1,025 million as of May 31, 2022 and $895 million as of May 31, 2021 was within our quarter-end target range of $1,000 million and $1,500 million. We had borrowings under securities repurchase transactions of $200 million as of May 31, 2021.

See “Note 6—Short-Term Borrowing” for additional information on our short-term borrowings.


72


Long-Term and Subordinated Debt

Long-term and subordinated debt, which represents the most significant componentsource of our funding. funding, totaled $23,766 million and $22,844 million as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, and accounted for 83% of total debt outstanding as of each respective date. The increase in total debt outstanding, including long-term and subordinated debt, was primarily due to the issuance of debt to fund loan portfolio growth.

The issuance of long-term debt allows us to reduce our reliance on short-term borrowings and effectively manage our refinancing and interest rate risk, due in part to the multi-year contractual maturity structure of long-term debt. In addition to access to private debt facilities, we also issue debt in the public capital markets. Pursuant to Rule 405 of the Securities Act,, we are classified as a “well-known seasoned issuer.” Pursuant toUnder our effective shelf registration statements filed with the SEC,U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), we may offer and issue the following debt securities:


an unlimited amount of collateral trust bonds until September 2019;
an unlimited amount ofand senior and subordinated debt securities, including medium-term notes, member capital securities and subordinated deferrable debt, until November 2020;October 2023; and


daily liquidity fund notes up to $20,000 million in the aggregate—with a $3,000 million limit on the aggregate principal amount outstanding at any time—until March 2022.2025.


We intend to file a new registration statement registering an unlimited amount of collateral trust bonds prior to the expiration of the existing shelf registration statement in September 2019. Although we register member capital securities and the daily liquidity fund notes with the SEC, these securities are not available for sale to the general public. Medium-term notes are available for sale to both the general public and members. Notwithstanding the foregoing, we have contractual limitations with respect to the amount of senior indebtedness we may incur.


As discussed in Consolidated Balance Sheet Analysis—Long-Term Debt long-term and subordinated debt totaled $21,554 millionSubordinated Debt—Issuances and accounted for 86% of total debt outstanding as of May 31, 2019, compared with $20,837 million, or 85%, of total debt outstanding as of May 31, 2018. The increase in total debt outstanding, including long-term and subordinated debt, was primarily due to the issuance of debt to fund loan portfolio growth. Repayments

Table 3225 summarizes long-term and subordinated debt issuances and repayments during fiscal year 2019.2022.


Table 32: Issuances and Repayments of25: Long-Term and Subordinated Debt(1)Issuances and Repayments
Year Ended May 31, 2022
(Dollars in thousands)Issuances
Repayments (1)
Debt product type:  
Collateral trust bonds$500,000 $855,000 
Guaranteed Underwriter Program notes payable450,000 613,830 
Farmer Mac notes payable720,000 603,229 
Medium-term notes sold to members121,038 102,987 
Medium-term notes sold to dealers2,195,524 875,756 
Other notes payable 3,564 
Members’ subordinated certificates1,364 21,862 
Total$3,987,926 $3,076,228 
  Year Ended May 31, 2019
(Dollars in thousands) Issuances 
Repayments (1)
 Change
Long-term and subordinated debt activity:(2)
      
Collateral trust bonds $1,575,000
 $1,830,000
 $(255,000)
Guaranteed Underwriter Program notes payable 625,000
 70,867
 554,133
Farmer Mac notes payable 575,000
 311,583
 263,417
Medium-term notes sold to members 194,355
 192,664
 1,691
Medium-term notes sold to dealers 329,907
 394,004
 (64,097)
Other notes payable 
 7,522
 (7,522)
Subordinated debt 250,000
 
 250,000
Members’ subordinated certificates 1,986
 24,861
 (22,875)
Total $3,551,248
 $2,831,501
 $719,747
___________________________
___________________________
(1)Amounts exclude unamortized debt issuance costs and discounts
(2)Repayments include principal maturities, scheduled amortization payments, repurchases and redemptions.


We provide additional information on our financing activities under the above undersection “Consolidated Balance Sheet Analysis—Debt” and on the weighted-average interest rates on our long-term debt and subordinated certificates in “Note 7—Long-Term Debt,” “Note 8—Subordinated Deferrable Debt” and “Note 9—Members’ Subordinated Certificates.”Certificates” of this Report.


Investment Portfolio


In addition



73


Pledged Collateral

Under our secured borrowing agreements we are required to pledge loans, investment debt securities or other collateral and maintain certain pledged collateral ratios. Of our primary sourcestotal debt outstanding of liquidity discussed above, we have an investment portfolio, composed of equity securities and held-to-maturity debt securities. We intend for our investment portfolio, which totaled $653 million and $710$28,747 million as of May 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, to remain adequately liquid to serve as a contingent supplemental source of liquidity for unanticipated liquidity needs.

On June 12, 2019, Farmer Mac redeemed its Series B non-cumulative preferred stock at a redemption price of $25.00 per share, plus any declared and unpaid dividends through and including the redemption date. The amortized cost2022, $16,051 million, or 56%, was secured by pledged loans totaling $19,062 million. In comparison, of our investment in the Farmer Mac Series B non-cumulative preferred stock was $25total debt outstanding of $27,426 million as of May 31, 2019, which equals the per share redemption price.

Pursuant to our2021, $16,644 million, or 61%, was secured by pledged loans totaling $19,153 million and pledged investment policy and guidelines, all fixed-income debt securities atwith an aggregate fair value of $211 million.

Secured Borrowing Agreements—Pledged Loan Requirements

We are required to pledge loans or other collateral in transactions under our collateral trust bond indentures, bond agreements under the time ofGuaranteed Underwriter Program and note purchase must be rated at least investment grade and on stable outlook based on external credit ratings from at least two of the leading global credit rating agencies, when available, or the corresponding equivalent, when not available. Securities rated investment grade, thatagreements with Farmer Mac. Total debt outstanding is those rated Baa3 or higher by Moody’s or BBB- or higher by S&P or BBB- or higher by Fitch, are generally considered


by the rating agencies to be of lower credit risk than non-investment grade securities. We have the positive intent and ability to hold these securities to maturity. As such, we have classified them as held to maturitypresented on our consolidated balance sheet.
sheets net of unamortized discounts and issuance costs. Our investment portfolio is unencumberedcollateral pledging requirements are based, however, on the face amount of secured outstanding debt, which excludes net unamortized discounts and structured so that securities have active secondary or resale markets under normal market conditions. The objectiveissuance costs. However, as discussed below, we typically maintain pledged collateral in excess of the portfoliorequired percentage. Under the provisions of our committed bank revolving line of credit agreements, the excess collateral that we are allowed to pledge cannot exceed 150% of the outstanding borrowings under our collateral trust bond indentures, the Guaranteed Underwriter Program or the Farmer Mac note purchase agreements.

Table 26 displays the collateral coverage ratios pursuant to these secured borrowing agreements as of May 31, 2022 and 2021.

Table 26: Collateral Pledged
 Requirement Coverage Ratios
Actual Coverage Ratios(1)
Minimum Debt IndenturesMaximum Committed Bank Revolving Line of Credit AgreementsMay 31,
20222021
Secured borrowing agreement type:
Collateral trust bonds 1994 indenture100 %150 %118 %116 %
Collateral trust bonds 2007 indenture100 150 123 115 
Guaranteed Underwriter Program notes payable100 150 113 114 
Farmer Mac notes payable100 150 111 116 
Clean Renewable Energy Bonds Series 2009A(2)
100 150 128 120 
____________________________
(1)Calculated based on the amount of collateral pledged divided by the face amount of outstanding secured debt.
(2)Collateral includes cash pledged.

Table 27 displays the unpaid principal balance of loans pledged for secured debt, the excess collateral pledged and unencumbered loans as of May 31, 2022 and 2021.

Table 27: LoansUnencumbered Loans
May 31,
(Dollars in thousands)20222021
Total loans outstanding(1)
$30,051,354$28,415,107
Less: Loans required pledged under secured debt agreements(2)
(16,300,618)(16,704,335)
 Loans pledged in excess of required amount(2)(3)
(2,761,335)(2,448,424)
   Total pledged loans$(19,061,953)$(19,152,759)
Unencumbered loans$10,989,401$9,262,348
Unencumbered loans as a percentage of total loans outstanding37 %33 %
____________________________


74


(1)Represents the unpaid principal balance of loans as of the end of each period. Excludes unamortized deferred loan origination costs of $12 million as of both May 31, 2022 and 2021.
(2)Reflects unpaid principal balance of pledged loans.
(3)Excludes cash collateral pledged to secure debt. If there is an event of default under most of our indentures, we can only withdraw the excess collateral
if we substitute cash or permitted investments of equal value.

As displayed above in Table 27, we had excess loans pledged as collateral totaling $2,761 million and $2,448 million as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. We typically pledge loans in excess of the required amount for the following reasons: (i) our distribution and power supply loans are typically amortizing loans that require scheduled principal payments over the life of the loan, whereas the debt securities issued under secured indentures and agreements typically have bullet maturities; (ii) distribution and power supply borrowers have the option to achieve returns commensurate with the levelprepay their loans; and (iii) individual loans may become ineligible for various reasons, some of risk assumed subject to CFC’s investment policy and guidelines and liquidity requirements.which may be temporary.


We provide additional information on our investment securitiesborrowings, including the maturity profile, below in “Liquidity Risk” and additional information on pledged loans in “Note 3—4—Loans” in this Report. For additional detail on each of our debt product types, refer to “Note 6—Short-Term Borrowings,” “Note 7—Long-Term Debt,” “Note 8—Subordinated Deferrable Debt” and “Note 9—Members’ Subordinated Certificates” in this Report.

Secured Borrowing Agreements—Pledged Investment Securities.”Securities

Projected Near-Term Sources and Uses of Liquidity


As discussed above in this section, we have master repurchase agreements with counterparties whereby we may sell investment-grade corporate debt securities from our primary sourcesinvestment securities portfolio subject to an obligation to repurchase the same or similar securities at an agreed-upon price and date. We had no borrowings under repurchase transactions outstanding as of liquidity include cash flows from operations, member loan repayments, committed bank revolving linesMay 31, 2022; therefore, we had no debt securities in our investment portfolio pledged as collateral as of credit, committed loan facilities,May 31, 2022. We had short-term borrowings under repurchase transactions of $200 million as of May 31, 2021. The debt securities underlying these transactions had an aggregate fair value of $211 million and funds fromwe repurchased the issuance of long-term and subordinated debt. Our primary uses of liquidity include loan advances to members, principal and interest paymentssecurities on borrowings, periodic settlement payments related to derivative contracts, and operating expenses.June 2, 2021.


Member Loan Repayments

Table 33 below28 displays our projected sourcesfuture scheduled loan principal payment amounts, by member class and uses of cash from debt and investment activity, by quarter, over the next six quarters through the quarter ended November 30, 2020. Our projected liquidity position reflects our current plan to expand our investment portfolio. Our assumptions also include the following: (i) the estimated issuance of long-term debt, including collateral trust bonds and private placement of term debt, is basedloan type, on maintaining a matched funding position within our loan portfolio with our bank revolving lines of credit serving as a backup liquidity facility for commercial paper and on maintaining outstanding dealer commercial paper at an amount below $1,250 million; (ii) long-term loan scheduled amortization payments represent the scheduled long-term loan payments for loans outstanding as of May 31, 2019, and our current estimate of long-term loan prepayments, which the amount and timing of are subject to change; (iii) other loan repayments and other loan advances primarily relate to line of credit repayments and advances; (iv) long-term debt maturities reflect scheduled maturities of outstanding term debt for the periods presented; and (v) long-term loan advances reflect our current estimate of member demand for loans, the amount and timing of which are subject to change.

Table 33: Projected Sources and Uses of Liquidity from Debt and Investment Activity(1)
  Projected Sources of Liquidity Projected Uses of Liquidity  
(Dollars in millions) Long-Term Debt Issuance 
Anticipated Long-Term
Loan Repayments
(2)
 
Other Loan Repayments(3)
 Total Projected
Sources of
Liquidity
 
Long-Term Debt Maturities(4)
 Long-Term
 Loan Advances
 
Other Loan Advances(5)
 Total Projected
Uses of
Liquidity
 
Other Sources/ (Uses) of Liquidity(6)
                   
1Q FY 2020 $230
 $384
 $194
 $808
 $301
 $548
 $140
 $989
 $108
2Q FY 2020 690
 299
 99
 1,088
 773
 393
 5
 1,171
 29
3Q FY 2020 890
 307
 76
 1,273
 650
 468
 
 1,118
 (183)
4Q FY 2020 90
 311
 9
 410
 161
 210
 
 371
 (129)
1Q FY 2021 490
 312
 
 802
 499
 316
 
 815
 5
2Q FY 2021 740
 309
 
 1,049
 491
 302
 
 793
 (275)
Total $3,130
 $1,922
 $378
 $5,430
 $2,875
 $2,237
 $145
 $5,257
 $(445)
____________________________
(1)The dates presented represent the end of each quarterly period through the quarter ended November 30, 2020.
(2) Anticipated long-term loan repayments include scheduled long-term loan amortizations, anticipated cash repayments at repricing date and sales.
(3)Other loan repayments include anticipated short-term loan repayments.
(4)Long-term debt maturities also include medium-term notes with an original maturity of2022, disaggregated by amounts due (i) in one year or lessless; (ii) after one year up to five years; (iii) after five years up to 15 years; and expected early redemptions(iv) after 15 years.

Table 28: Loans—Maturities of debt.Scheduled Principal Payments
(5) Other loan advances include anticipated short-term loan advances.
May 31, 2022
(Dollars in thousands)
Due1 Year
Due > 1 Year Up to 5 Years
Due > 5 Years Up to 15 Years
Due After 15 YearsTotal
Member class:
CFC:
Distribution$2,197,517 $4,837,933 $9,667,194 $7,141,598 $23,844,242 
Power supply465,457 1,183,547 1,844,234 1,408,532 4,901,770 
Statewide and associate26,984 67,549 15,632 16,698 126,863 
Total CFC2,689,958 6,089,029 11,527,060 8,566,828 28,872,875 
NCSC89,058 266,286 273,871 81,663 710,878 
RTFC54,682 219,239 193,680  467,601 
Total loans outstanding$2,833,698 $6,574,554 $11,994,611 $8,648,491 $30,051,354 
Loan type:
Fixed rate$1,461,284 $5,441,363 $11,720,034 $8,329,691 $26,952,372 
Variable rate1,372,414 1,133,191 274,577 318,800 3,098,982 
Total loans outstanding$2,833,698 $6,574,554 $11,994,611 $8,648,491 $30,051,354 
(6) Includes net increase or decrease to dealer commercial paper, and purchases and maturity of investments.



As displayed in Table 33, we currently project long-term advances of $1,619 million over the next 12 months, which we anticipate will exceed anticipated loan repayments over the same period of $1,301 million by approximately $318 million. The estimates presented above are developed at a particular point in time based on our expected future business growth and funding. Our actual results and future estimates may vary, perhaps significantly, from the current projections, as a result of changes in market conditions, management actions or other factors.75





Contractual Obligations


Our contractual obligations affect both our short- and long-term liquidity needs. Table 34 displays aggregated information about the listed categories of ourOur most significant contractual obligations as of May 31, 2019. The table provides informationinclude scheduled payments on the contractual maturity profile of our debt securities basedobligations. Table 29 displays scheduled amounts due on our debt obligations in each of the next five fiscal years and thereafter. The amounts presented reflect undiscounted future cash payment amounts due pursuant to these obligations, aggregated by the type of contractual obligation. The table excludes certain obligations where the obligation is short-term, such as trade payables, or where the amount is not fixed and determinable, such as derivatives subject to valuation based on market factors. The timing of actual future payments may differ from those presented due to a number of factors, such as discretionary debt redemptions or changes in interest rates that may impact our expected future cash interest payments.


Table 34:29: Contractual Obligations(1)
Fiscal Year Ended May 31,
(Dollars in millions) 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Thereafter Total(Dollars in millions)20232024202520262027ThereafterTotal
Short-term borrowings $3,608
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $3,608
Short-term borrowings$4,981 $ $ $ $ $ $4,981 
Long-term debt 1,638
 1,827
 1,925
 1,171
 1,076
 11,574
 19,211
Long-term debt1,896 2,144 2,212 2,420 1,602 11,543 21,817 
Subordinated deferrable debt 
 
 
 
 
 986
 986
Subordinated deferrable debt     1,000 1,000 
Members’ subordinated certificates(2)
 9

42

15

24

16

1,251
 1,357
Members’ subordinated certificates(2)
17 8 8 54 9 1,138 1,234 
Total long-term and subordinated debt 1,647
 1,869
 1,940
 1,195
 1,092
 13,811
 21,554
Total long-term and subordinated debt1,913 2,152 2,220 2,474 1,611 13,681 24,051 
Contractual interest on long-term debt(3)
 703
 657
 606
 558
 530
 6,415
 9,469
Contractual interest on long-term debt(3)
674 638 601 540 486 5,312 8,251 
Total specified contractual obligations $5,958

$2,526

$2,546

$1,753

$1,622

$20,226

$34,631
TotalTotal$7,568 $2,790 $2,821 $3,014 $2,097 $18,993 $37,283 
____________________________
(1)Callable debt is included in this table at its contractual maturity.
(2)Excludes $0.05 million in subscribed and unissued member subordinated certificates for which a payment has been received, but no certificate has been issued. Amortizing member(2 Member loan subordinated certificates totaling $254$175 million are amortizing annually based on the unpaid principal balance of the related loan. Amortization payments on these certificates totaled $17$12 million in fiscal year 20192022 and represented 7% of amortizing loan subordinated certificates outstanding.
(3) Represents the amounts of future interest payments on long-term and subordinated debt outstanding as of May 31, 2019,2022, based on the contractual terms of the securities. These amounts were determined based on certain assumptions, including that variable-rate debt continues to accrue interest at the contractual rates in effect as of May 31, 20192022 until maturity, and redeemable debt continues to accrue interest until its contractual maturity.


Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

In the ordinary course of business, we engage in financial transactions that are not presented on our consolidated balance sheets, or may be recorded on our consolidated balance sheets in amounts that are different from the full contract or notional amount of the transaction. Our off-balance sheet arrangements consist primarily of unadvanced loan commitments intended to meet the financial needs of our members and guarantees of member obligations, which may affect our liquidity and funding requirements based on the likelihood that borrowers will advance funds under the loan commitments or we will be required to perform under the guarantee obligations. We provide information on our unadvanced loan commitments in “Note 4—Loans” and information on our guarantee obligations in “Note 13—Guarantees.”

Projected Near-Term Sources and Uses of Funds

Table 30 below displays a projection of our primary sources and uses of funds, by quarter, over each of the next six fiscal quarters through the quarter ending November 30, 2023. Our projection is based on the following, which includes several assumptions: (i) the estimated issuance of long-term debt, including collateral trust bonds and private placement of term debt, is based on our market-risk management goal of minimizing the mismatch between the cash flows from our financial assets and our financial liabilities; (ii) amounts available under our committed bank revolving lines of credit are intended to serve as a backup source of liquidity; (iii) long-term loan scheduled amortization repayment amounts represent scheduled loan principal payments for long-term loans outstanding as of May 31, 2022, plus estimated prepayment amounts on long-term loans; (iv) amounts reported in Table30 as “other loan repayments” and “other loan advances” are primarily attributable to expected repayments and advances under lines of credit; (v) long-term and subordinated debt maturities consist of both scheduled principal maturity and amortization amounts and projected principal maturity and amortization


76


amounts on term debt outstanding in each period presented; and (vi) long-term loan advances are based on our current projection of member demand for loans.

Table 30: Liquidity—Projected Sources and Uses of Funds(1)
 Projected Sources of FundsProjected Uses of Funds
(Dollars in millions)Long-Term Debt Issuance
Anticipated Long-Term
Loan Repayments
(2)
Other
Loan
Repayments
(3)
Total Projected
Sources of
Funds
Long-Term and Subordinated Debt Maturities(4)
Long-Term
 Loan Advances
Other Loan Advances(5)
Total Projected
Uses of
Funds
Other Sources/ (Uses) of Funds(6)
1Q FY 2023$499 $383 $126 $1,008 $509 $822 $34 $1,365 $307 
2Q FY 2023794 363 15 1,172 807 623 39 1,469 230 
3Q FY 20231,423 364 29 1,816 870 712 21 1,603 (262)
4Q FY 202376 369 14 459 270 472 17 759 229 
1Q FY 2024488 368  856 606 618  1,224 370 
2Q FY 2024644 356  1,000 731 605  1,336 266 
Total$3,924 $2,203 $184 $6,311 $3,793 $3,852 $111 $7,756 $1,140 
____________________________
(1) The dates presented represent the end of each quarterly period through the quarter ended November 30, 2023.
(2) Anticipated long-term loan repayments include scheduled long-term loan amortizations, anticipated cash repayments at repricing date and loan sales.
(3)Other loan repayments include anticipated short-term loan repayments.
(4)Long-term debt maturities also include medium-term notes with an original maturity of one year or less and expected early redemptions of debt.
(5)Other loan advances include anticipated short-term loan advances.
(6) Includes net increase or decrease to dealer commercial paper, member commercial paper and select notes, and purchases and maturity of investments.

As displayed in Table 30, we currently project long-term advances of $2,629 million over the next 12 months, which we project will exceed anticipated long-term loan repayments over the same period of $1,479 million, resulting in net loan growth of approximately $1,150 million over the next 12 months.

The estimates presented above are developed at a particular point in time based on our expected future business growth and funding. Our actual results and future estimates may vary, perhaps significantly, from the current projections, as a result of changes in market conditions, management actions or other factors.

Credit Ratings


Our funding and liquidity, borrowing capacity, ability to access capital markets and other sources of funds and the cost of these funds are partially dependent on our credit ratings. Rating agencies base their

On December 13, 2021, S&P affirmed CFC’s credit ratings and stable outlook under its revised criteria and updated methodology for rating financial institutions published on numerous factors, including liquidity, capital adequacy, industry position, member support, management, asset quality, qualityDecember 9, 2021. On December 16, 2021, Moody’s affirmed CFC’s credit ratings and stable outlook.On February 4, 2022, Fitch issued a credit ratings report review of earningsCFC in which Fitch affirmed CFC’s credit ratings and the probability of systemic support. Significant changes in these factors could result in different ratings. stable outlook.

Table 3531 displays our credit ratings as of May 31, 2019. Moody's, S&P and Fitch affirmed our ratings and outlook during the third quarter of fiscal year 2019. Our credit ratings as of May 31, 2019 are2022, which remain unchanged from May 31, 2018, and as of the date of the filing of this Report.




77


Table 35:31: Credit Ratings
May 31, 20192022
CFC debt product type and outlook:Moody’sS&PFitch
Long-term issuer credit rating(1)
A2AA-A
Senior secured debt(2)
A1AA-A+
Senior unsecured debt(3)
A2AA-A
Subordinated debtA3BBB+BBBBBB+
Commercial paperP-1A-1A-2F1
OutlookStableStableStable
___________________________
(1)Based on our senior unsecured debt rating.


(2)Applies to our collateral trust bonds.
(3)Applies to our medium-term notes.


In order to access the commercial paper markets at attractive rates, we believe we need to maintain our current commercial paper credit ratings of P-1 by Moody’s, A-1 by S&P and F1 by Fitch. In addition, the notes payable to the Federal Financing Bank and guaranteed by RUS under the Guaranteed Underwriter Program contain a provision that if during any portion of the fiscal year, our senior secured credit ratings do not have at least two of the following ratings: (i) A3 or higher from Moody’s, (ii) A- or higher from S&P, (iii) A- or higher from Fitch, or (iv) an equivalent rating from a successor rating agency to any of the above rating agencies, we may not make cash patronage capital distributions in excess of 5% of total patronage capital. See “Credit Risk—Counterparty Credit Risk—Credit Risk-Related Contingent Features” above for information on credit rating provisions related to our derivative contracts.


Financial Ratios


Our debt-to-equity ratio increaseddecreased to 19.80-to-113.59 as of May 31, 2019,2022, from 16.72-to-120.17 as of May 31, 2018,2021, primarily due to an increase in equity from our reported net income of $799 million for fiscal year 2022, which was partially offset by a decrease in equity attributable to the CFC Board of Directors’ authorized patronage capital retirement in July 2021 of $58 million.

While our goal is to maintain an adjusted debt-to-equity ratio of approximately 6.00-to-1, the adjusted debt-to-equity ratio of 6.24 and 6.15 as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, was above our targeted goal due to increased borrowings to fund the loan growth in our loan portfolio and a decrease in equity resulting from our reported net loss of $151 million for fiscal year 2019 and the patronage capital retirement of $48 million in August 2018.portfolio.

Our adjusted debt-to-equity ratio decreased to 5.73-to-1 as of May 31, 2019, from 6.18-to-1 as of May 31, 2018, primarily attributable to an increase in adjusted equity resulting from the issuance of $250 million of subordinated deferrable debt in the forth quarter of fiscal year 2019.

We provide a reconciliation of our adjusted debt-to-equity ratio to the most comparable GAAP measure and an explanation of the adjustments below in “Non-GAAP Financial Measures.”


Debt Covenants


As part of our short-term and long-term borrowing arrangements, we are subject to various financial and operational covenants. If we fail to maintain specified financial ratios, such failure could constitute a default by CFC of certain debt covenants under our committed bank revolving line of credit agreements and senior debt indentures. We were in compliance with all covenants and conditions under our committed bank revolving line of credit agreements and senior debt indentures as of May 31, 2019.2022.


As discussed above in “Introduction” and “Item 6—“Summary of Selected Financial Data,” the financial covenants set forth in our committed bank revolving line of credit agreements and senior debt indentures are based on adjusted financial measures, including adjusted TIER. We provide a reconciliation of adjusted TIER and other non-GAAP measures disclosed in this Report to the most comparable U.S. GAAP measures and an explanation of the adjustments below in “Non-GAAP Financial Measures.”


Covenants—Committed Bank Revolving Line of Credit Agreements

Table 36 presents the required and actual financial ratios under our committed bank revolving line of credit agreements as of or for the years ended May 31, 2019 and 2018. We were required to meet the minimum adjusted TIER ratio of 1.05 in fiscal year 2019 in order to retire patronage capital to our members.

Table 36: Financial Covenant Ratios Under Committed Bank Revolving Lines of Credit Agreements(1)
    Actual
    May 31,
  Requirement 2019 2018
Financial covenant ratios:      
Minimum average adjusted TIER over the six most recent fiscal quarters(1)
 1.025
 1.19 1.17
Minimum adjusted TIER for the most recent fiscal year 1.05
 1.19 1.17
Maximum ratio of adjusted senior debt to total equity 10.00
 5.52 5.92


____________________________
(1)Adjusted TIER is calculated based on adjusted net income (loss) plus adjusted interest expense for the period, divided by adjusted interest expense for the period. In addition to the adjustments made to the leverage ratio set forth under “Non-GAAP Financial Measures,” adjusted senior debt excludes guarantees to member systems that have certain investment-grade credit ratings from Moody’s and S&P.

In addition to the financial covenants, our committed bank revolving line of credit agreements generally prohibit liens on loans to members except for liens pursuant to the following:

under terms of our indentures;
related to taxes that are being contested or are not delinquent;
stemming from certain legal proceedings that are being contested in good faith;
created by CFC to secure guarantees by CFC of indebtedness, the interest on which is excludable from the gross income of the recipient for federal income tax purposes;
granted by any subsidiary to CFC; and
to secure other indebtedness of CFC of up to $10,000 million plus an amount equal to the incremental increase in CFC’s allocated Guaranteed Underwriter Program obligations, provided that the aggregate amount of such indebtedness may not exceed $12,500 million. The amount of our secured indebtedness under this provision for all of our committed bank revolving line of credit agreements was $8,475 million as of May 31, 2019.

Covenants—Debt Indentures

Table 37 presents the required and actual financial ratios as defined under our 1994 collateral trust bonds indenture and our medium-term notes indentures in the U.S. markets as of May 31, 2019 and 2018.

Table 37: Financial Ratios Under Debt Indentures
    Actual
    May 31,
  Requirement 2019 2018
Maximum ratio of adjusted senior debt to total equity (1)
 20.00 6.62 6.53
____________________________
(1) The ratio calculation includes the adjustments made to the leverage ratio under “Non-GAAP Financial Measures,” with the exception of the adjustments to exclude the noncash impact of derivative financial instruments and adjustments from total liabilities and total equity.

In addition to the above financial covenant requirement, we are required to pledge collateral pursuant to the provisions of certain of our borrowing agreements. We provide information on collateral pledged or on deposit above under “Consolidated Balance Sheet Analysis—Debt—Collateral Pledged.”
MARKET RISK


Interest rate risk represents our primary source of market risk. Interestrisk, as interest rate-volatility can have a significant impact on the earnings and overall financial condition of a financial institution. We are exposed to interest rate risk is the risk to current or anticipated earnings or equity arising primarily from movementsthe differences in interest rates. This risk results from differencesthe timing between the timingmaturity or repricing of cash flows on our assetsloans and the liabilities funding those assets. The timing of cash flows of our assets is impacted by re-pricing characteristics, prepaymentsloans. Below we discuss how we manage and contractual maturities. measure interest rate risk.

We discuss thealso provide a status update on actions taken to identify, assess, monitor and mitigate risks related to the uncertainty as to the nature of potential changes or other reforms associated with the expected discontinuance or unavailability of LIBOR and facilitate an orderly transition away from and expected replacement of LIBOR as a benchmark interest reference rate in “Item 1A. Risk Factors.”to an alternative benchmark rate.





78


Interest Rate Risk Management


Our interest rate risk exposurerisk-management objective is primarily related to prudently manage the fundingtiming of the fixed-rate loan portfolio. Our Asset Liability Committee provides oversight for maintaining our interest rate position within a prescribed policy range using approved strategies. The Asset Liability Committee reviews a completecash flows between interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities in order to mitigate interest rate risk analysis, reviews proposed modifications, if any, to our interest ratein accordance with CFC’s board policy and risk management strategylimits and considers adopting strategy changes. Our Asset Liability Committee monitors interest rate risk and meets quarterly to review and discuss information such as national economic forecasts, federal funds and interest rate forecasts, interest rate gap analysis, our liquidity position, loan and debt maturities, short-term


and long-term funding needs, anticipated loan demands, credit concentration risk, derivative counterparty exposure and financial forecasts. The Asset Liability Committee also discusses the composition of fixed-rate versus variable-rate loans, new funding opportunities, changes to the nature and mix of assets and liabilities for structural mismatches, and interest rate swap transactions.

Matched Funding Objective

Our funding objective is to manage the matched funding of asset and liability repricing terms within a range of adjusted total assets (calculated by excluding derivative assets from total assets) deemed appropriateguidelines established by the Asset Liability Committee based on the current environment and extended outlook for interest rates. We refer(“ALCO”). The ALCO provides oversight of our exposure to the difference between fixed-rate loans scheduled for amortization or repricing and the fixed-rate liabilities and equity funding those loans as our interest rate gap. risk and ensures that our exposure is compliant with established risk limits and guidelines. We seek to generate stable adjusted net interest income on a sustained and long-term basis by minimizing the mismatch between the cash flows from our interest-rate sensitive financial assets and our financial liabilities. We use derivatives as a tool in matching the duration and repricing characteristics of our assets and liabilities, which we discuss above in “Consolidated Results of Operations—Non-Interest Income—Derivative Gains (Losses) and “Note 10—Derivatives and Hedging Activities.”

Interest Rate Risk Assessment

Our primary strategies for managingAsset Liability Management (“ALM”) framework includes the use of analytic tools and capabilities, enabling CFC to generate a comprehensive profile of our interest rate risk includeexposure. We routinely measure and assess our interest rate risk exposure using various methodologies through the use of derivativesALM models that enable us to more accurately measure and limitingmonitor our interest rate risk exposure under multiple interest rate scenarios using several different techniques. Below we present two measures used to assess our interest rate risk exposure: (i) the amountinterest rate sensitivity of fixed-rate assets that can be funded by variable-rate debt to a specified percentage ofprojected net interest income and adjusted total assets based on market conditions.net interest income; and (ii) duration gap.

Interest Rate Sensitivity Analysis

We provideregularly evaluate the sensitivity of our members with many options on loans with regard tointerest-earning assets and the interest-bearing liabilities funding those assets and our net interest rates, the term for which the selectedincome and adjusted net interest income projections under multiple interest rate isscenarios. Each month we update our ALM models to reflect our existing balance sheet position and incorporate different assumptions about forecasted changes in effectour current balance sheet position over the next 12 months. Based on the forecasted balance sheet changes, we generate various projections of net interest income and adjusted net interest income over the abilitynext 12 months. Management reviews and assesses these projections and underlying assumptions to convert or prepayidentify a baseline scenario of projected net interest income and adjusted net interest income over the loan. Long-term loans generally have maturities of up to 35 years. Borrowers may select fixed interest rates for periods of one year through the life of the loan. We do not match fund the majority of our fixed-rate loans with a specific debt issuancenext 12 months, which reflects what management considers, at the time, as the loans are advanced. We fundmost likely scenario. As discussed under “Summary of Selected Financial Data,” we derive adjusted net interest income by adjusting our reported interest expense and net interest income to include the amountimpact of fixed-rate assets that exceed fixed-rate debt and members’ equity with short-term debt, primarily commercial paper.net derivative cash settlements amounts.


Interest Rate Gap Analysis

As part of our asset-liability management, we perform a monthlyOur interest rate gap analysissensitivity analyses take into consideration existing interest rate-sensitive assets and liabilities as of the reported balance sheet date and forecasted changes to the balance sheet over the next 12 months under management’s baseline projection. As discussed in the “Executive Summary—Outlook” section, we currently anticipate net long-term loan growth of $1,150 million over the next 12 months. The yield curve has flattened throughout 2022 and was inverted in late March 2022, as shorter-term rates rose above longer-term rates, attributable to the increase in the target range for the federal funds rate by the FOMC due to increased inflation projections. The consensus market outlook for interest rates as of the second half of June 2022 pointed to rising interest rates across the yield curve, with the yield curve remaining flat or inverted over the remainder of 2022. Based on this yield curve forecast, we anticipate a decrease in our reported net interest income, reported net interest yield and adjusted net interest yield over the next 12 months relative to the prior 12-month period ended May 31, 2022. However, we believe we will experience a slight increase in our adjusted net interest income over the next 12 months relative to the prior 12-month period ended May 31, 2022 based on the yield curve forecast, which we anticipate will reduce our derivative net periodic cash settlements expense and thereby reduce our adjusted cost of borrowings.

Table 32 presents the estimated percentage impact that provides a comparison between the timinghypothetical instantaneous parallel shift of cash flows, by year, for fixed-rate assets scheduled for amortization and repricing and for fixed-rate liabilities and members’ equity maturing. This gap analysis is a useful toolplus or minus 100 basis points in measuring, monitoring and mitigating the interest rate risk inherent in the funding of fixed-rate assets with variable-rate debtyield curve, relative to our base case forecast yield curve, would have on our projected baseline 12-month net interest income and also helpful in assessing liquidity risk.

Table 38 displays the scheduled amortization and repricing of fixed-rate assets and outstanding fixed-rate liabilities and equityadjusted net interest income as of May 31, 2019.2022 and 2021. We exclude variable-rate loans from ourassumed an interest rate gap analysis as we do not consider the interestfloor rate risk on these loans to be significant because they are subject to repricing at least monthly. Loans with variable interest rates accounted for 11% and 10% of our total loan portfolio0% as of May 31, 20192022 and 2018, respectively. Fixed-rate liabilities include debt issued2021, if the hypothetical instantaneous interest rate shift of minus 100 basis points resulted in a negative interest rate. We also present the estimated percentage impact on our projected baseline 12-month net interest income and adjusted net interest income assuming a hypothetical inverted yield curve under which shorter-term rates increase by an instantaneous 150 basis points.



79


Table 32: Interest Rate Sensitivity Analysis(1)
May 31, 2022May 31, 2021
Estimated Impact(1)
+ 100 Basis Points
– 100 Basis Points(2)
+150 Basis Points Inverted+ 100 Basis Points
– 100 Basis Points(2)
+150 Basis Points Inverted
Net interest income(9.76)%9.68%(14.25)%(6.13)%(3.34)%(10.67)%
Derivative cash settlements interest expense10.49%(10.49)%7.95%8.12%(3.01)%0.38%
Adjusted net interest income(3)
0.74%(0.81)%(6.31)%1.99%(6.35)%(10.29)%
____________________________
(1)The actual impact on our reported and adjusted net interest income may differ significantly from the sensitivity analysis presented.
(2)Floored at a fixed rate,zero percent interest rate.
(3)We include net periodic derivative cash settlement interest expense amounts as well as variable-rate debt swapped to a fixed rate usingcomponent of interest rate swaps. Fixed-rate debt swapped to a variable rate usingexpense in deriving adjusted net interest rate swaps is excluded fromincome. See the analysis because it is used to match fund our variable-rate loans. With the exception of members’ subordinated certificates, which are generally issued with extended maturities, and commercial paper, our liabilities have average maturities that closely match the repricing terms (but not the maturities) of our fixed-rate loans.

Table 38: Interest Rate Gap Analysis
(Dollars in millions) Prior to 5/31/20 Two Years 6/1/20 to 5/31/22 Two Years 6/1/22 to
5/31/24
 Five Years 6/1/24 to
5/31/29
 10 Years 6/1/29 to 5/31/39 6/1/39 and Thereafter Total
Asset amortization and repricing $1,767
 $3,243
 $2,770
 $5,627
 $7,051
 $3,059
 $23,517
Liabilities and members’ equity:              
Long-term debt (1)(2)
 $1,825
 $3,584
 $2,448
 $6,184
 $4,911
 $1,994
 $20,946
Subordinated deferrable debt and subordinated certificates(2)(3)
 14
 39
 408
 604
 153
 773
 1,991
Members’ equity (4)
 
 22
 23
 102
 283
 948
 1,378
Total liabilities and members’ equity $1,839
 $3,645
 $2,879
 $6,890
 $5,347
 $3,715
 $24,315
Gap (5)
 $(72) $(402) $(109) $(1,263) $1,704
 $(656) $(798)
               
Cumulative gap (72) (474) (583) (1,846) (142) (798)  
Cumulative gap as a % of total assets (0.27)% (1.75)% (2.15)% (6.81)% (0.52)% (2.94)%  
Cumulative gap as a % of adjusted total assets(6)
 (0.27) (1.75) (2.15) (6.82) (0.52) (2.95)  


____________________________
(1)Includes long-term fixed-rate debt and the net impact of our interest rate swaps.
(2)The maturity presented for debt is based on the call date.
(3)Represents the amount of subordinated deferrable debt and subordinated certificates allocated to fund fixed-rate assets.
(4)Represents the portion of members’ equity and loan loss allowance allocated to fund fixed-rate assets. See Table 45: Members’ Equity below undersection “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” for a reconciliation of total CFC equitythe non-GAAP measures presented in this Report to members’ equity.the most comparable U.S. GAAP measure.
(5)Calculated based
The changes in the sensitivity measures between May 31, 2022 and 2021 are primarily attributable to changes in the timing, size, and composition of our forecasted balance sheet, as well as changes in current interest rates and forecasted interest rates. As the interest rate sensitivity simulations displayed in Table 32 indicate, we would expect an unfavorable impact on our projected adjusted net interest income over a 12-month horizon as of May 31, 2022, under the amounthypothetical scenario of an instantaneous parallel shift of minus 100 basis points in the interest rate yield curve. We also would expect an unfavorable impact on both our projected net interest income and our adjusted net interest income over a 12-month horizon as of May 31, 2022, under the hypothetical scenario of a further inverted yield curve where shorter-term interest rates increase by an instantaneous 150 basis points.

Duration Gap

The duration gap, which represents the difference between the estimated duration of our interest-earning assets scheduledand the estimated duration of our interest-bearing liabilities, summarizes the extent to which the cashflows for amortizationassets and liabilities are matched over time. We use derivatives in managing the differences in timing between the maturities or repricing of our loans and the debt funding our loans. A positive duration gap indicates that the duration of our interest-earning assets is greater than the duration of our debt and derivatives, and therefore an increased exposure to rising interest rates over the long term. Conversely, a negative duration gap indicates that the duration of our interest-earning assets is less total liabilitiesthan the duration of our debt and members’ equity funding those assets.
(6)Adjusted total assets represents total assets reportedderivatives, and therefore an increased exposure to declining interest rates over the long term. While the duration gap provides a relatively concise and simple measure of the interest rate risk inherent in our consolidated balance sheets less derivative assets.

When the amountsheet as of the cash flows relatedreported date, it does not incorporate projected changes in our consolidated balance sheet.

The duration gap widened to fixed-rate assets scheduled for amortization and repricing exceeds the amountplus 5.29 months as of cash flows related to the fixed-rate debt and equity funding those assets, we refer to the difference, or gap,May 31, 2022, from plus 1.69 months as “warehousing.” When the amountof May 31, 2021. The widening of the cash flows relatedduration gap reflected the funding of long-term fixed-rate loan advances of $2,911 million during the current fiscal year primarily with shorter-duration borrowings. The duration gap of 5.29 months as of May 31, 2022, was within the risk limits and guidelines established by ALCO.

Limitations of Interest Rate Risk Measures

While we believe that the interest income sensitivities and duration gap measures provided are useful tools in assessing our interest rate risk exposure, there are inherent limitations in any methodology used to fixed-rate assets scheduled for amortizationestimate the exposure to changes in market interest rates. These measures should be understood as estimates rather than as precise measurements. The interest rate sensitivity analyses only contemplate certain hypothetical movements in interest rates and repricing is less thanare performed at a particular point in time based on the amount ofexisting balance sheet and, in some cases, expected future business growth and funding mix assumptions. The strategic actions that management may take to manage our balance sheet may differ significantly from our projections, which could cause our actual interest income to differ substantially from the cash flows relatedabove sensitivity analysis. Moreover, as discussed above, we use various other methodologies to the fixed-rate debtmeasure and equity funding those assets, we refer to the gap as “prefunding.” The amount of the gap is an indicationmonitor our interest rate risk under multiple interest rate scenarios, which, together, provide a comprehensive profile of our interest rate risk.




80


LIBOR Transition

In July 2017, the United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”), which regulates the LIBOR index, announced that it intended to stop compelling banks to submit the rates required to calculate LIBOR after December 31, 2021. Following this announcement, the Federal Reserve Board and liquidity risk exposure. Our goalthe Federal Reserve Bank of New York established the Alternative Reference Rates Committee (“ARRC”) which is comprised of private-market participants and ex-officio members representing banking and financial sector regulators. The ARRC has recommended SOFR as the alternative reference rate.

In March 2021, the FCA and the Intercontinental Exchange (“ICE”) Benchmark Administration, the administrator for LIBOR, concurrently confirmed the intention to maintain an unmatched positionstop requiring banks to submit the rates required to calculate LIBOR after December 31, 2021 for one-week and two-month LIBOR and June 30, 2023 for all remaining LIBOR tenors. Pursuant to the announcement, one-week and two-month LIBOR ceased to be published immediately after December 31, 2021, and all remaining USD LIBOR tenors will cease to be published or lose representativeness immediately after June 30, 2023.

We established a cross-functional LIBOR working group that identified CFC’s exposure, assessed the potential risks related to the cash flows for fixed-rate financial assets withintransition from LIBOR to a targeted range of adjusted total assets.

Because the substantial majoritynew index and developed a strategic transition plan. Our transition effort is focused on two objectives: (i) remediation of our existing LIBOR exposures and (ii) transitioning ongoing activities away from LIBOR. The LIBOR working group has been closely monitoring and assessing developments with respect to the LIBOR transition and providing regular reports to our senior management team and the CFC Board of Directors. We have identified all of CFC’s LIBOR-based contracts and financial assets are fixed-rate, amortizing loansinstruments, evaluated the impact of the LIBOR transition on our existing systems, models and these loans are primarily funded with bullet debtprocesses and equity, our interest rate gap analysis typically reflectsupdated all internal systems to accommodate SOFR as a warehouse position. When we are in a warehouse position, we utilize some short-term borrowings to fund the scheduled amortization and repricing of our financial assets. However, we limit the extent to which we fund our long-term, fixed-rate loans with short-term, variable-rate debt because it exposes us to higher interest rate and liquidity risk.new index.

As indicated above in Table 38, we were in a prefunded position of $798 million as of May 31, 2019, rather than our typical warehouse position. The primary factors that resulted in this prefunded position included a reduced level of member investments and our expectation that the yield curve will remain inverted or flat in the near term, which provided an opportunity for us to issue longer-term debt at an attractive coupon rate. We do not expect to maintain a prefunded position as we expect to continue to fund long-term fixed rate loans in the future.

Financial Instruments


Table 39 provides information about33 summarizes our financial instruments, other than derivatives, that are sensitive to changes in interest rates. We provide additional information on our use of derivatives and exposure in “Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies—Derivative Instruments” and “Note 10—Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.” All of ouroutstanding LIBOR-indexed financial instruments as of May 31, 2019 were entered into or contracted for purposes other than trading. For debt obligations,2022 that have a contractual maturity date after June 30, 2023. These financial instruments are included in amounts reported on our consolidated balance sheets.

Table 33: LIBOR-Indexed Financial Instruments
(Dollars in millions)May 31, 2022
Loans to members, performing$402
Investment securities62
Debt1,663

In addition to the table presents principal cash flowsfinancial instruments presented in Table 33, we have outstanding LIBOR-indexed interest rate swaps and related averageunadvanced loan commitments that have a contractual maturity date after June 30, 2023. The aggregate notional amount of these interest rates by expected maturity datesrate swaps was $7,201 million as of May 31, 2019.
























Table 39: Financial Instruments
      Principal Amortization and Maturities
  
Outstanding
Balance
 
Fair
Value
   
Remaining
Years
(Dollars in millions)   2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 
Assets:                
Equity securities $88
 $88
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $88
Investment securities, held to maturity $565
 $571
 $65
 $103
 $126
 $153
 $93
 $25
Average rate 2.98%   2.08% 2.87% 3.00% 3.01% 3.61% 3.10%
Long-term fixed-rate loans (1)
 $23,094
 $22,949
 $1,182
 $1,179
 $1,180
 $1,177
 $1,136
 $17,240
Average rate 4.62% 

 4.42% 4.46% 4.50% 4.52% 4.59% 4.67%
Long-term variable-rate loans $1,067
 $1,067
 $72
 $50
 $51
 $43
 $48
 $803
Average rate 4.01% 

 
 
 
 
 
 
Line of credit loans $1,745
 $1,745
 $1,745
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
Average rate 3.78% 

 3.78% 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities and equity:                
Short-term borrowings (2)
 $3,608
 $3,608
 $3,608
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
Average rate 2.56% 
 2.56% 
 
 
 
 
Long-term debt $19,211
 $20,147
 $1,638

$1,827

$1,925

$1,171

$1,076

$11,574
Average rate 3.20% 

 2.36% 2.73% 2.93% 2.75% 3.18% 3.49%
Subordinated deferrable debt $986
 $1,005
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $986
Average rate 5.11% 
 
 
 
 
 
 5.11%
Memberssubordinated certificates (3)
 $1,357
 $1,357
 $9
 $42
 $15
 $24
 $16
 $1,251
Average rate 4.21% 
 2.61% 3.73% 2.91% 3.53% 2.32% 4.29%
____________________________
(1)The principal2022, which represented 89% of the total notional amount of fixed-rate loans is the totalour outstanding interest rate swaps of scheduled principal amortizations without consideration for loans that reprice. Includes $12$8,062 million in TDR loans that were on accrual status as of May 31, 2019.
(2) Short-term borrowings consists of commercial paper, select notes, daily liquidity fund notes, bank bid notes and medium-term notes issued with an original maturity of one year or less.
(3) Excludes $0.05 million in subscribed and unissued member subordinated certificates for which a payment has been received, but no certificate has been issued. Amortizing member loan subordinated certificates totaling $254 million are amortizing annually based on the unpaid principal balance2022. The aggregate amount of the related loan. The amortization payments on these certificates totaled $17unadvanced loan commitments was $2,690 million in fiscal year 2019, which represented 7% of amortizing loan subordinated certificates outstanding.

Loan Repricing
Table 40 shows long-term fixed-rate loans outstanding as of May 31, 2019,2022, which will be subjectrepresented 19% of the total unadvanced loan commitments of $14,111 million as of May 31, 2022.

We ceased originating new LIBOR-based loans effective December 31, 2021. We have confirmed CFC’s adherence to the International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. 2020 LIBOR Fallbacks Protocol for our derivative instruments. We are also closely monitoring the development of alternative credit-sensitive rates in addition to SOFR such as the Bloomberg Short-Term Bank Yield-Index.

We discuss the risks related to the uncertainty as to the nature of potential changes and other reforms associated with the transition away from and expected replacement of LIBOR as a benchmark interest rate repricing during the next five fiscal years and thereafter (due to principal repayments, amounts subject to interest rate repricing may be lower at the actual time of interest rate repricing).under “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in this Report.

Table 40: Loan Repricing


81
(Dollars in thousands) 
Repricing
Amount
 
Weighted-Average
Interest Rate
2020 $486,294
 4.48%
2021 422,839
 4.40
2022 393,571
 4.63
2023 271,478
 4.83
2024 218,968
 4.83
Thereafter 1,284,828
 5.06
Total $3,077,978
 4.79




OPERATIONAL RISK


Operational risk represents the risk of loss resulting from conducting our operations, including, but not limited to, the execution of unauthorized transactions by employees; errors relating to loan documentation, transaction processing and technology; the inability to perfect liens on collateral; breaches of internal control and information systems; and the risk of fraud by employees or persons outside the company. This risk of loss also includes potentialPotential legal actions that could arise as a result of operational deficiencies, noncompliance with covenants in our revolving credit agreements and indentures, employee misconduct or adverse business decisions.decisions are also considered part of operational risk. In the event of a breakdown in internal controls, improper access to or operation of systems or improper employee actions, we could incur financial loss. Operational/businessOperational risk may also includeincludes breaches of our technology and information systems resulting from unauthorized access to confidential information or from internal or external threats, such as cyberattacks. In addition, as we rely on our employees’ depth of knowledge of CFC and its related industries to run our business operations successfully, operational risk includes talent management; thereby, failure to attract, motivate and retain sufficient number of highly skilled and specialized employees could adversely affect our business.


Operational risk is inherent in all business activities. The measurement, assessment and effective management of such risk is important to the achievement of our objectives. Operational risk is a core component of CFC’s Enterprise Risk Management framework and is governed by CFC’s Board of Directors while management oversight of the risk is the responsibility of the Chief Risk Officer. We maintain related risk guidelines and limits, business policies and procedures, employee training, an internal control framework, and a comprehensive business continuity and disaster recovery plan that are intended to provide a sound operational environment. Our business policies and controls have been designed to manage operational risk at appropriate levels given our financial strength, the business environment and markets in which we operate, the nature of our businesses, andwhile also considering factors such as competition and regulation. CorporateCorporate Compliance monitors compliance with established procedures and applicable lawlaws that are designed to ensure adherence to generally accepted conduct, ethics and business practices defined in our corporate policies. We provide employee compliance training programs, including information protection, suspicious activity reportingRegulation FD (“Fair Disclosure”) compliance and operational risk. Internal Audit examines the design and operating effectiveness of our operational, compliance and financial reporting internal controls on an ongoing basis.


Our business continuity and disaster recovery plan is monitored by our Business Technology Services Group and establishes the basic principles and framework necessary to ensure emergency response, resumption, restoration and permanent recovery of CFC’s operations and business activities during a business interruption event. This plan includes a duplication of our operating systems at an offsite facility coupled with an extensive business continuity and recovery process to leverage those remote systems. Each of our departmentsdepartments is requiredrequired to develop, exercise, test and maintain business resumption plans for the recovery of business functions and processing resources to minimize disruption for our members and other parties with whom we do business. We conduct disaster recovery exercises periodically that include both the information technology groupBusiness Technology Services Group and business areas. The business resumption plans are based on a risk assessment that considers potential losses due to unavailability of service versus the cost of resumption. These plans anticipate a variety of probable scenarios ranging from local to regional crises.


As cyber-relatedWe continue to enhance our crisis management framework to provide additional corporate guidance on the management of and response to significant crises that may have an adverse disruptive impact on our business. The crises identified include, but are not limited to, man-made and natural disasters including infectious disease pandemics, technology disruption and workforce issues. The objectives of the enhancements are to ensure, in the event of an identified crisis, we have well-documented plans in place to protect our employees and the work environment, safeguard CFC’s operations, protect CFC’s brand and reputation and minimize the impact of business disruptions. We conducted a business impact analysis for each identified crisis to assess the potential impact on our business operations, financial performance, technology and staff. The results of the business impact analysis have been utilized to develop management action plans that align business priorities, clarify responsibilities and establish processes and procedures that enable us to respond in a timely, proactive manner and take appropriate actions to manage and mitigate the potential disruptive impact of specified crises.

Our cybersecurity risk management efforts are a core component of our overall enterprise risk management framework and CFC’s operational risk oversight. In fiscal year 2022, we continued to add specialized resources dedicated to cybersecurity, which has further strengthened our ability to measure, analyze and action potential risks effectively. CFC’s cybersecurity efforts are an important element of our Business Technology Services Group. Efforts to further develop CFC’s cybersecurity risk management are benchmarked against industry best practice notwithstanding an environment that continues to evolve as new potentials risks emerge. Cyber-related attacks pose a risk to the security of our members’ strategic business information


82


and the confidentiality and integrity of our data, which includes strategic and proprietary information. Because such an attack could materially affecthave a material adverse impact on our operations, our boardthe CFC Board of directors places particular emphasis onDirectors is actively engaged in the oversight of our continuous efforts in monitoring and managing the risks associated with the ever-evolving nature of cybersecurity risks.threats. Each quarter, or more frequently as requested by the board of directors, management provides reports on CFC’s security operations, including any cybersecurity incidents, management’s efforts to manage any incidents, promptly respond to and resolve such incidents, and any other related information requested from management. On at least an annual basis, the board of directors reviews management reports concerning the disclosure controls and procedures in place to enable CFC to make accurate and timely disclosures about any material cybersecurity events. Additionally, upon the occurrence of a material cybersecurity incident, the board of directors will be notified of the event so it may properly evaluate such incident, including management’s remediation plan.

NON-GAAPSELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL MEASURESDATA


Table 34 provides a summary of condensed quarterly financial information for fiscal years 2022 and 2021.

Table 34: Selected Quarterly Financial Data
Year Ended May 31, 2022
(Dollars in thousands)Aug 31, 2021Nov 30, 2021Feb 28, 2022May 31, 2022Total
Interest income$283,268 $283,152 $285,206 $289,617 $1,141,243 
Interest expense(174,777)(173,596)(173,654)(183,507)(705,534)
Net interest income108,491 109,556 111,552 106,110 435,709 
Benefit (provision) for credit losses(4,003)3,400 12,749 5,826 17,972 
Net interest income after benefit (provision) for credit losses104,488 112,956 124,301 111,936 453,681 
Non-interest income:
Derivative gains (losses)(172,163)46,086 169,280 413,279 456,482 
Other non-interest income1,716 487 (7,351)(7,838)(12,986)
Total non-interest income(170,447)46,573 161,929 405,441 443,496 
Non-interest expense(24,466)(23,526)(23,922)(25,578)(97,492)
Income (loss) before income taxes(90,425)136,003 262,308 491,799 799,685 
Income tax benefit (provision)93 (274)(343)(624)(1,148)
Net income (loss)(90,332)135,729 261,965 491,175 798,537 
Less: Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests438 (631)(888)(1,611)(2,692)
Net income (loss) attributable to CFC$(89,894)$135,098 $261,077 $489,564 $795,845 



83


Year Ended May 31, 2021
(Dollars in thousands)Aug 31, 2020Nov 30, 2020Feb 28, 2021May 31, 2021Total
Interest income$279,584 $276,499 $278,172 $282,346 $1,116,601 
Interest expense(179,976)(174,422)(173,040)(174,625)(702,063)
Net interest income99,608 102,077 105,132 107,721 414,538 
Benefit (provision) for credit losses(326)(1,638)(33,023)6,480 (28,507)
Net interest income after benefit (provision) for credit losses99,282 100,439 72,109 114,201 386,031 
Non-interest income:
Derivative gains60,276 81,287 330,196 34,542 506,301 
Other non-interest income8,175 4,971 1,012 6,266 20,424 
Total non-interest income68,451 86,258 331,208 40,808 526,725 
Non-interest expense(22,995)(25,914)(23,863)(25,008)(97,780)
Income before income taxes144,738 160,783 379,454 130,001 814,976 
Income tax provision(151)(262)(507)(78)(998)
Net income144,587 160,521 378,947 129,923 813,978 
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests(171)(505)(1,213)(422)(2,311)
Net income attributable to CFC$144,416 $160,016 $377,734 $129,501 $811,667 

The increase in our reported net income of $361 million to $491 million for the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2022 from $130 million for the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2021, was primarily driven by an increase in derivative gains of $379 million. We recorded derivative gains of $413 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2022, attributable to increases in interest rates across the entire swap curve during the period. In contrast, we recorded derivative gains of $35 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2021, attributable to increases in medium- and longer-term swap interest rates during the period.

In addition, net interest income decreased $2 million, or 1%, to financial measures determined$106 million in accordance with GAAP, management evaluates performance basedthe fourth quarter of fiscal year 2022, attributable to a decrease in the net interest yield. We also experienced an unfavorable shift in other non-interest income of $14 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2022, primarily attributable to the unfavorable shift in gains and losses recorded on certain non-GAAP measures, which we refer toour investment securities, as “adjusted” measures. a result of period-to-period market fluctuations in fair value.

NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES

Below we provide a discussion ofdiscuss each of thesethe non-GAAP adjusted measures and provide a reconciliation of our adjusted measures to the most comparable U.S. GAAP measures in this section.measures. We believe our non-GAAP adjusted metrics,measures, which are not a substitute for U.S. GAAP and may not be consistent with similarly titled non-GAAP measures used by other companies, provide meaningful information and are useful to investors because management usesevaluates performance based on these metrics to comparefor purposes of (i) establishing performance goals; (ii) budgeting and forecasting; (iii) comparing period-to-period operating results, across financial reporting periods, for internal budgetinganalyzing changes in results and forecasting purposes, foridentifying potential trends; and (iv) making compensation decisions and for short- and long-term strategic planning decisions. In addition, certain of the financial covenants in our committed bank revolving line of credit agreements and debt indentures are based on ournon-GAAP adjusted measures.




Statements of Operations Non-GAAP Adjustments


OurOne of our primary performance measures is TIER, which is a measure is TIER.indicating our ability to cover the interest expense requirements on our debt. TIER is calculated by adding the interest expense to net income prior to the cumulative effect of change in accounting principle and dividing that total by the interest expense. TIER is a measure of our ability to cover interest expense requirements on our debt. We adjust the TIER calculation to add the derivative cash settlements expense to the interest expense and to remove the derivative forward value gains (losses) and foreign currency adjustments from total net income. Adding the cash settlements expense back to interest expense also has a corresponding effect on our adjusted net interest income.



84


We use derivatives to manage interest rate risk on our funding of the loan portfolio. The derivative cash settlements expense represents the amount that we receive from or pay to our counterparties based on the interest rate indexes in our derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting. We adjust the reported interest expense to include the derivative cash settlements expense. We use the adjusted cost of funding to set interest rates on loans to our members and believe that the interest expense adjusted to include derivative cash settlements expense represents our total cost of funding for the period. TIER calculated by adding the derivative cash settlements expense to the interest expense reflects management’s perspective on our operations and, therefore, we believe that it represents a useful financial measure for investors.


The derivative forward value gains (losses) and foreign currency adjustments do not represent our cash inflows or outflows during the current period and, therefore, do not affect our current ability to cover our debt service obligations. The derivative forward value gains (losses) included in the derivative gains (losses) line of the statement of operations represents a present value estimate of the future cash inflows or outflows that will be recognized as net cash settlements expense for all periods through the maturity of our derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting. We have not issued foreign-denominated debt since 2007, and as of May 31, 20192022 and 2018,2021, there were no foreign currency derivative instruments outstanding.

For operational management and decision-making purposes, we subtract derivative forward value gains (losses) and foreign currency adjustments from our net income when calculating TIER and for other net income presentation purposes. In addition, since the derivative forward value gains (losses) and foreign currency adjustments do not represent current periodcurrent-period cash flows, we do not allocate such funds to our members and, therefore, exclude the derivative forward value gains (losses) and foreign currency adjustments from net income in calculating the amount of net income to be allocated to our members. TIER calculated by excluding the derivative forward value gains (losses) and foreign currency adjustments from net income reflects management’s perspective on our operations and, therefore, we believe that it represents a useful financial measure for investors.


Total equity includes the noncash impact of derivative forward value gains (losses) and foreign currency adjustments recorded in net income. It also includes as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income the impact of changes in the fair value of derivatives designated as cash flow hedges as well as the remaining transition adjustment recorded when we adopted the accounting guidance that required all derivatives be recorded on the balance sheet at fair value. In evaluating our debt-to-equity ratio discussed further below, we make adjustments to equity similar to the adjustments made in calculating TIER. We exclude from total equity the cumulative impact of changes in derivative forward value gains (losses) and foreign currency adjustments and amounts included in accumulated other comprehensive income related to derivatives designated for cash flow hedge accounting and the remaining derivative transition adjustment to derive non-GAAP adjusted equity.


Net Income and Adjusted Net Income

Table 4135 provides a reconciliation of adjusted interest expense, adjusted net interest income, adjusted total revenue and adjusted net income to the comparable U.S. GAAP measures. TheThese adjusted amountsmeasures are used in the calculation of our adjusted net interest yield and adjusted TIER for each fiscal year in the five-year period ended May 31, 2019.2022.






Table 41: Adjusted Financial Measures — Income Statement85


  Year Ended May 31,
(Dollars in thousands) 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015
Interest expense $(836,209) $(792,735) $(741,738) $(681,850) $(635,684)
Include: Derivative cash settlements expense (43,611) (74,281) (84,478) (88,758) (82,906)
Adjusted interest expense $(879,820) $(867,016) $(826,216) $(770,608) $(718,590)
           
Net interest income $299,461
 $284,622
 $294,896
 $330,786
 $317,292
Include: Derivative cash settlements expense (43,611) (74,281) (84,478) (88,758) (82,906)
Adjusted net interest income $255,850
 $210,341
 $210,418
 $242,028
 $234,386
           
Net income (loss) $(151,210) $457,364
 $312,099
 $(51,516) $(18,927)
Exclude: Derivative forward value gains (losses) (319,730) 306,002
 179,381
 (221,083) (114,093)
Adjusted net income $168,520
 $151,362
 $132,718
 $169,567
 $95,166
Table 35: Adjusted Net Income
Year Ended May 31,
(Dollars in thousands)20222021202020192018
Adjusted net interest income:
Interest income$1,141,243 $1,116,601 $1,151,286 $1,135,670 $1,077,357 
Interest expense(705,534)(702,063)(821,089)(836,209)(792,735)
Include: Derivative cash settlements interest expense(1)
(101,385)(115,645)(55,873)(43,611)(74,281)
Adjusted interest expense(806,919)(817,708)(876,962)(879,820)(867,016)
Adjusted net interest income$334,324 $298,893 $274,324 $255,850 $210,341 
Adjusted total revenue:
Net interest income$435,709 $414,538 $330,197 $299,461 $284,622 
Fee and other income17,193 18,929 22,961 15,355 17,578 
Total revenue452,902 433,467 353,158 314,816 302,200 
Include: Derivative cash settlements interest expense(1)
(101,385)(115,645)(55,873)(43,611)(74,281)
Adjusted total revenue$351,517 $317,822 $297,285 $271,205 $227,919 
Adjusted net income:
Net income (loss)$798,537 $813,978 $(589,430)$(151,210)$457,364 
Exclude: Derivative forward value gains (losses)(2)
557,867 621,946 (734,278)(319,730)306,002 
Adjusted net income$240,670 $192,032 $144,848 $168,520 $151,362 

____________________________
(1)Represents the net periodic contractual interest expense amount on our interest rate swaps during the reporting period.
(2)Represents the change in fair value of our interest rate swaps during the reporting period due to changes in expected future interest rates over the remaining life of our derivative contracts.

We primarily fund our loan portfolio through the issuance of debt. However, we use derivatives as economic hedges as part of our strategy to manage the interest rate risk associated with funding our loan portfolio. We therefore consider the cost ofinterest expense incurred on our derivatives to be an inherentpart of our funding cost of funding and hedging our loan portfolio and, therefore, economically similarin addition to the interest expense thaton our debt. As such, we recognize on debt issued for funding. We therefore includeadd net periodic derivative cash settlements interest expense inamounts to our reported interest expense to derive our adjusted interest expense and adjusted net interest income. We exclude the unrealized derivative forward value of derivativesgains and losses from our adjusted total revenue and adjusted net income.


TIER and Adjusted TIER


Table 42 presents36 displays the calculation of our TIER and adjusted TIER for each fiscal year in the five-year period ended May 31, 2019.2022.


Table 42:36: TIER and Adjusted TIER
 Year Ended May 31,Year Ended May 31,
 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 20222021202020192018
TIER (1)
 0.82

1.58

1.42

0.92

0.97
TIER (1)
2.13 2.16 0.28 0.82 1.58 
Adjusted TIER (2)
 1.19

1.17

1.16

1.22

1.13
Adjusted TIER (2)
1.30 1.23 1.17 1.19 1.17 
____________________________
(1) TIER is calculated based on our net income (loss) plus interest expense for the period divided by interest expense for the period.
(2) Adjusted TIER is calculated based on adjusted net income (loss) plus adjusted interest expense for the period divided by adjusted interest expense for the period.


Debt-to-Equity



86


Liabilities and Equity and Adjusted Debt-to-EquityLiabilities and Equity


Management relies on the adjusted debt-to-equity ratio as a key measure in managing our business. We therefore believe that this adjusted measure, in combination with the comparable U.S. GAAP measure, is useful to investors in evaluating performance.our financial condition. We adjust the comparable U.S. GAAP measure to:


exclude debt used to fund loans that are guaranteed by RUS from total liabilities;
exclude from total liabilities, and add to total equity, debt with equity characteristics issued to our members and in the capital markets; and
exclude the noncash impact of derivative financial instruments and foreign currency adjustments from total liabilities and total equity.


We are an eligible lender under aan RUS loan guarantee program. Loans issued under this program carry the U.S. government’s guarantee of all interest and principal payments. We have little or no risk associated with the collection of principal and interest payments on these loans. Therefore, we believe there is little or no risk related to the repayment of the


liabilities used to fund RUS-guaranteed loans and we subtract such liabilities from total liabilities to calculate our adjusted debt-to-equity ratio.


Members may be required to purchase subordinated certificates as a condition of membership and as a condition to obtaining a loan or guarantee. The subordinated certificates are accounted for as debt under U.S. GAAP. The subordinated certificates have long-dated maturities and pay no interest or pay interest that is below market, and under certain conditions we are prohibited from making interest payments to members on the subordinated certificates. For computing our adjusted debt-to-equity ratio we subtract members’ subordinated certificates from total liabilities and add members’ subordinated certificates to total equity.


We also sell subordinated deferrable debt in the capital markets with maturities of up to 30 years and the option to defer interest payments. The characteristics of subordination, deferrable interest and long-dated maturity are all equity characteristics. In calculating our adjusted debt-to-equity ratio, we subtract subordinated deferrable debt from total liabilities and add it to total equity.


We record derivative instruments at fair value on our consolidated balance sheets. For computing our adjusted debt-to-equity ratio we exclude the noncash impact of our derivative accounting from liabilities and equity. Also, for computing our adjusted debt-to-equity ratio we exclude the impact of foreign currency valuation adjustments from liabilities and equity. The debt-to-equity ratio adjusted to exclude the effect of foreign currency translation reflect management’s perspective on our operations and, therefore, we believe is a useful financial measure for investors.


Table 4337 provides a reconciliation between theour total liabilities and total equity used to calculate the debt-to-equity ratio and the adjusted amounts used in the calculation of our adjusted debt-to-equity ratio as of the end of each fiscal year in the five-year period ended May 31, 2019.2022. As indicated in the following table,Table 37, subordinated debt is treated in the same manner as equity in calculating our adjusted-debt-to-equityadjusted debt-to-equity ratio.


Table 43: Adjusted Financial Measures — Balance Sheet
















87


  May 31,
(Dollars in thousands) 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015
Total liabilities $25,820,490
 $25,184,351
 $24,106,887
 $23,452,822
 $21,934,273
Exclude:          
Derivative liabilities 391,724
 275,932
 385,337
 594,820
 408,382
Debt used to fund loans guaranteed by RUS 153,991
 160,865
 167,395
 173,514
 179,241
Subordinated deferrable debt 986,020
 742,410
 742,274
 742,212
 395,699
Subordinated certificates 1,357,129
 1,379,982
 1,419,025
 1,443,810
 1,505,420
Adjusted total liabilities $22,931,626
 $22,625,162
 $21,392,856
 $20,498,466
 $19,445,531
           
Total equity $1,303,882
 $1,505,853
 $1,098,805
 $817,378
 $911,786
Exclude:          
Prior-year cumulative derivative forward
value losses
 (34,974) (340,976) (520,357) (299,274) (185,181)
Current-year derivative forward value gains (losses) (319,730) 306,002
 179,381
 (221,083) (114,093)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (1)
 2,571
 1,980
 3,702
 4,487
 5,371
Include: 
        
Subordinated certificates 1,357,129
 1,379,982
 1,419,025
 1,443,810
 1,505,420
Subordinated deferrable debt 986,020
 742,410
 742,274
 742,212
 395,699
Adjusted total equity $3,999,164
 $3,661,239
 $3,597,378
 $3,519,270
 $3,106,808
Table 37: Adjusted Liabilities and Equity
____________________________
May 31,
(Dollars in thousands)20222021202020192018
Adjusted total liabilities:
Total liabilities$29,109,413 $28,238,484 $27,508,783 $25,820,490 $25,184,351 
Exclude:     
Derivative liabilities128,282 584,989 1,258,459 391,724 275,932 
Debt used to fund loans guaranteed by RUS131,128 139,136 146,764 153,991 160,865 
Subordinated deferrable debt986,518 986,315 986,119 986,020 742,410 
Subordinated certificates1,234,161 1,254,660 1,339,618 1,357,129 1,379,982 
Adjusted total liabilities$26,629,324 $25,273,384 $23,777,823 $22,931,626 $22,625,162 
Adjusted total equity:
Total equity$2,141,969 $1,399,879 $648,822 $1,303,882 $1,505,853 
Exclude:     
Prior fiscal year-end cumulative derivative forward value losses(1)
(467,036)(1,088,982)(354,704)(34,974)(340,976)
Year-to-date derivative forward value gains (losses)(1)
557,867 621,946 (734,278)(319,730)306,002 
Period-end cumulative derivative forward value gains (losses)(1)
90,831 (467,036)(1,088,982)(354,704)(34,974)
AOCI attributable to derivatives(2)
1,341 1,718 2,130 2,571 1,980 
Subtotal92,172 (465,318)(1,086,852)(352,133)(32,994)
Include:    
Subordinated deferrable debt986,518 986,315 986,119 986,020 742,410 
Subordinated certificates1,234,161 1,254,660 1,339,618 1,357,129 1,379,982 
Subtotal2,220,679 2,240,975 2,325,737 2,343,149 2,122,392 
Adjusted total equity$4,270,476 $4,106,172 $4,061,411 $3,999,164 $3,661,239 
____________________________
(1) Represents consolidated total derivative forward value gains (losses).
(2) Represents the AOCI amount related to derivatives. See “Note 11—Equity” for the additional components of AOCI.


Debt-to-Equity and Adjusted Debt-to-Equity Ratios

Table 4438 displays the calculations of our debt-to-equity and adjusted debt-to-equity ratios as of the end of each fiscal year during the five-year period ended May 31, 2019.2022.




88


Table 44:38: Debt-to-Equity Ratio and Adjusted Debt-to-Equity Ratio
May 31,
(Dollars in thousands)20222021202020192018
Debt-to-equity ratio:
Total liabilities$29,109,413 $28,238,484 $27,508,783 $25,820,490 $25,184,351 
Total equity2,141,969 1,399,879 648,822 1,303,882 1,505,853 
Debt-to-equity ratio (1)
13.59 20.17 42.40 19.80 16.72 
Adjusted debt-to-equity ratio:
Adjusted total liabilities(2)
$26,629,324 $25,273,384 $23,777,823 $22,931,626 $22,625,162 
Adjusted total equity(2)
4,270,476 4,106,172 4,061,411 3,999,164 3,661,239 
Adjusted debt-to-equity ratio (3)
6.24 6.15 5.85 5.73 6.18 
  May 31,
  2019 2018 2017 2016 2015
Debt-to-equity ratio (1)
 19.80
 16.72
 21.94
 28.69
 24.06
Adjusted debt-to-equity ratio (2)
 5.73
 6.18
 5.95
 5.82
 6.26
____________________________
____________________________
(1) Calculated based on total liabilities as of the end of the periodat period-end divided by total equity asat period-end.
(2)See Table 37 above for details on the calculation of these non-GAAP adjusted measures and the end ofreconciliation to the period.most comparable U.S. GAAP measures.
(2) (3) Calculated based on adjusted total liabilities at period endperiod-end divided by adjusted total equity as of the end of the period.at period-end.


MembersEquity

Total CFC Equity and MembersEquity

Members’ equity includesexcludes the noncash impact of derivative forward value gains (losses) and foreign currency adjustments recorded in net income. It also includesincome and amounts recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income. We provide the components of accumulated other comprehensive income in “Note 11—Equity.” Because these amounts generally have not been realized, they are not available to members and are excluded by CFC’sthe CFC Board of Directors in determining the annual allocation of adjusted net income to patronage capital, to the members’ capital reserve and to other member funds.

Table 4539 provides a reconciliation of members’ equity to total CFC equity as of May 31, 20192022 and 2018.2021. We present the components of accumulated other comprehensive income in “Note 11—Equity.”


Table 45:39: Members’ Equity
May 31,
(Dollars in thousands)20222021
Members’ equity:
Total CFC equity$2,114,573 $1,374,948 
Exclude:
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)2,258 (25)
Period-end cumulative derivative forward value gains (losses) attributable to CFC(1)
92,363 (461,162)
Subtotal94,621 (461,187)
Members’ equity$2,019,952 $1,836,135 
____________________________
(1)Represents period-end cumulative derivative forward value losses for CFC only, as total CFC equity does not include the noncontrolling interests of the variable interest entities NCSC and RTFC, which we are required to consolidate. We report the separate results of operations for CFC in “Note 16—Business Segments.” The period-end cumulative derivative forward value total loss amounts as of May 31, 2022 and 2021 are presented above in Table 37.

Item 7A.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
  May 31,
(Dollars in thousands) 2019 2018
Total CFC equity $1,276,735
 $1,474,333
Excludes:    
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (147) 8,544
Current period-end cumulative derivative forward value losses (348,965) (30,831)
Subtotal (349,112) (22,287)
Members’ equity $1,625,847
 $1,496,620



Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk


For quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk, see “Item 7. MD&A—Market Risk” and “MD&A—Consolidated Results of Operations—Non-Interest Income—Derivatives Gains (Losses)” and also “Note 10—Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.”Activities” in this Report.




89


Item 8.    Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data





90


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


To the Board of Directors and Members
National Rural Utilities Cooperative Finance Corporation:


Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of National Rural Utilities Cooperative Finance Corporation and subsidiaries (the Company) as of May 31, 20192022 and 2018,2021, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), changes in equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three‑yearthree-year period ended May 31, 2019,2022, and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of May 31, 20192022 and 2018,2021, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three‑yearthree-year period ended May 31, 2019,2022, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on thesethese consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.


Critical Audit Matter

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

Assessment of the allowance for credit losses of loans evaluated on a collective basis

As discussed in Notes 1 and 5 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company’s allowance for credit losses for loans evaluated on a collective basis (the collective ACL) was $28.9 million as of May 31, 2022. The collective ACL includes the measure of expected credit losses on a collective (pool) basis for those loans that share similar risk characteristics. The Company estimates the collective ACL using a probability of default (PD) and loss given default (LGD) methodology. The Company segments its loan portfolio into pools based on member borrower type, which is based on the utility sector of the borrower, and further by internal borrower risk ratings. The Company then applies


91


loss factors, consisting of the PD and LGD, to the scheduled loan-level amortization amounts over the life of the loans. Due to a limited history of defaults in the portfolio, the Company utilizes third-party default data tables for the utility sector as a proxy to estimate default rates for each of the pools. Based on the mapping of internal borrower risk rating to equivalent credit rating provided in the third party utility default tables, the Company applies corresponding cumulative default rates to the scheduled loan amortization amounts over the remaining life of loan in each of the pools. For estimation of an LGD the Company utilizes its lifetime historical loss experience for each of the portfolio segments. The Company estimates that, based on historical experience, expected credit losses will not be affected by changes in economic factors and therefore, the Company has not made adjustments to the historical rates for any economic forecasts. The Company considers the need to adjust the historical loss information for differences in the specific characteristics of its existing loan portfolio based on an evaluation of relevant qualitative factors, such as differences in the composition of the loan portfolio, underwriting standards, problem loan trends, the quality of the Company’s credit review functions, the regulatory environment and other pertinent external factors.

We identified the assessment of the collective ACL as a critical audit matter. A high degree of audit effort, including specialized skills and knowledge, and subjective and complex auditor judgment was involved in the assessment of the collective ACL due to significant measurement uncertainty. Specifically, the assessment encompassed the evaluation of the collective ACL methodology, portfolio segmentation, and the method used to estimate the PD and LGD and their significant assumptions, including third-party proxy default data for the utility sector, and borrower risk ratings. The assessment also included an evaluation of the conceptual soundness of the collective ACL methodology. In addition, auditor judgment was required to evaluate the sufficiency of audit evidence obtained.

The following are the primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter. We evaluated the design of certain internal controls related to the Company’s measurement of the collective ACL estimate, including controls over the:

development of the collective ACL methodology

continued use and appropriateness of the method and significant assumptions used to develop the PD and LGD

analysis of credit quality trends and ratios.

We evaluated the Company’s process to develop the collective ACL estimate by testing certain sources of data, factors, and assumptions that the Company used, and considered the relevance and reliability of such data, factors, and assumptions. In addition, we involved credit risk professionals with specialized skills and knowledge, who assisted in:

evaluating the Company’s collective ACL methodology for compliance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles

evaluating the conceptual soundness and the judgments made by the Company relative to the assessment of the PD and LGD by comparing them to relevant Company-specific metrics and trends and the applicable industry and regulatory practices

determining whether the loan portfolio is segmented by similar risk characteristics by comparing to the Company’s business environment and relevant industry practices

testing individual borrower risk ratings for a selection of borrowers by evaluating the financial performance of the borrower, sources of repayment, and any relevant guarantees or underlying collateral

evaluating the appropriateness of mapping an alignment of internal borrower risk ratings to equivalent credit ratings provided in the third-party utility default table.





92


We also assessed sufficiency of the audit evidence obtained related to the collective ACL estimate by evaluating the:

cumulative results of the audit procedures
qualitative aspects of the Company’s accounting practices
potential bias in the accounting estimates.



/s/ KPMG LLP    


We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2013.
McLean, Virginia
July 31, 2019August 8, 2022












93



NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
        CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS




 Year Ended May 31,
(Dollars in thousands)202220212020
Interest income$1,141,243 $1,116,601 $1,151,286 
Interest expense(705,534)(702,063)(821,089)
Net interest income435,709 414,538 330,197 
Benefit (provision) for credit losses17,972 (28,507)(35,590)
Net interest income after benefit (provision) for credit losses453,681 386,031 294,607 
Non-interest income:   
Fee and other income17,193 18,929 22,961 
Derivative gains (losses)456,482 506,301 (790,151)
Investment securities gains (losses)(30,179)1,495 9,431 
Total non-interest income443,496 526,725 (757,759)
Non-interest expense:   
Salaries and employee benefits(51,863)(55,258)(54,522)
Other general and administrative expenses(43,323)(39,447)(46,645)
Losses on early extinguishment of debt(754)(1,456)(683)
Other non-interest expense(1,552)(1,619)(25,588)
Total non-interest expense(97,492)(97,780)(127,438)
Income (loss) before income taxes799,685 814,976 (590,590)
Income tax benefit (provision)(1,148)(998)1,160 
Net income (loss)798,537 813,978 (589,430)
Less: Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests(2,692)(2,311)4,190 
Net income (loss) attributable to CFC$795,845 $811,667 $(585,240)
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.




94
 
Year Ended May 31,
(Dollars in thousands)
2019
2018
2017
Interest income $1,135,670
 $1,077,357
 $1,036,634
Interest expense (836,209) (792,735) (741,738)
Net interest income 299,461
 284,622
 294,896
Benefit (provision) for loan losses 1,266
 18,575
 (5,978)
Net interest income after benefit (provision) for loan losses 300,727
 303,197
 288,918
Non-interest income (loss):
 

 

 
Fee and other income
15,355

17,578

19,713
Derivative gains (losses)
(363,341)
231,721

94,903
Results of operations of foreclosed assets




(1,749)
Unrealized losses on equity securities (1,799) 
 
Total non-interest income (loss)
(349,785)
249,299

112,867
Non-interest expense:
 

 

 
Salaries and employee benefits
(49,824)
(51,422)
(47,769)
Other general and administrative expenses
(43,342)
(39,462)
(38,457)
Gains (losses) on early extinguishment of debt
(7,100)


192
Other non-interest expense
(1,675)
(1,943)
(1,948)
Total non-interest expense
(101,941)
(92,827)
(87,982)
Income (loss) before income taxes (150,999) 459,669
 313,803
Income tax expense (211) (2,305) (1,704)
Net income (loss) (151,210) 457,364
 312,099
Less: Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests 1,979
 (2,178) (2,193)
Net income (loss) attributable to CFC $(149,231) $455,186
 $309,906
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.







NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
        CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)




 Year Ended May 31,
(Dollars in thousands)202220212020
Net income (loss)$798,537 $813,978 $(589,430)
Other comprehensive income (loss):   
Changes in unrealized gains on derivative cash flow hedges4,028 — — 
Reclassification to earnings of realized gains on derivatives(623)(412)(441)
Defined benefit plan adjustments(1,122)2,297 (1,322)
Other comprehensive income (loss)2,283 1,885 (1,763)
Total comprehensive income (loss)800,820 815,863 (591,193)
Less: Total comprehensive (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests(2,692)(2,311)4,190 
Total comprehensive income (loss) attributable to CFC$798,128 $813,552 $(587,003)
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.



95
  Year Ended May 31,
(Dollars in thousands) 2019 2018 2017
Net income (loss) $(151,210) $457,364
 $312,099
Other comprehensive income (loss):  
  
  
Unrealized gains (losses) on equity securities 
 (3,222) 4,614
Unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges 1,059
 (1,059) 
Reclassification of losses on foreclosed assets to net income 
 
 9,823
Reclassification of derivative gains to net income (468) (663) (785)
Defined benefit plan adjustments (488) 313
 (1,535)
Other comprehensive income (loss) 103
 (4,631) 12,117
Total comprehensive income (loss) (151,107) 452,733
 324,216
Less: Total comprehensive (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests 1,979
 (2,178) (2,193)
Total comprehensive income (loss) attributable to CFC $(149,128) $450,555
 $322,023
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.






NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
May 31,
(Dollars in thousands)20222021
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents$153,551 $295,063 
Restricted cash7,563 8,298 
Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash161,114 303,361 
Investment securities:
Debt securities trading, at fair value ($— and $210,894 pledged as collateral as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively)566,146 576,175 
Equity securities, at fair value33,758 35,102 
Total investment securities, at fair value599,904 611,277 
Loans to members30,063,386 28,426,961 
Less: Allowance for credit losses(67,560)(85,532)
Loans to members, net29,995,826 28,341,429 
Accrued interest receivable111,418 107,856 
Other receivables35,431 37,197 
Fixed assets, net101,762 91,882 
Derivative assets222,042 121,259 
Other assets23,885 24,102 
Total assets$31,251,382 $29,638,363 
Liabilities:
Accrued interest payable$131,950 $123,672 
Debt outstanding:
Short-term borrowings4,981,167 4,582,096 
Long-term debt21,545,440 20,603,123 
Subordinated deferrable debt986,518 986,315 
Members’ subordinated certificates:  
Membership subordinated certificates628,603 628,594 
Loan and guarantee subordinated certificates365,388 386,896 
Member capital securities240,170 239,170 
Total members’ subordinated certificates1,234,161 1,254,660 
Total debt outstanding28,747,286 27,426,194 
Deferred income44,332 51,198 
Derivative liabilities128,282 584,989 
Other liabilities57,563 52,431 
Total liabilities29,109,413 28,238,484 
Equity:
CFC equity:  
Retained equity2,112,315 1,374,973 
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)2,258 (25)
Total CFC equity2,114,573 1,374,948 
Noncontrolling interests27,396 24,931 
Total equity2,141,969 1,399,879 
Total liabilities and equity$31,251,382 $29,638,363 
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.


96
  May 31,
(Dollars in thousands) 2019 2018
Assets:    
Cash and cash equivalents $177,922
 $230,999
Restricted cash 8,282
 7,825
Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash 186,204
 238,824
Time deposits 
 100,000
Investment securities:    
Equity securities 87,533
 89,332
Debt securities held to maturity, at amortized cost 565,444
 520,519
Total investment securities 652,977
 609,851
Loans to members 25,916,904
 25,178,608
Less: Allowance for loan losses (17,535) (18,801)
Loans to members, net 25,899,369
 25,159,807
Accrued interest receivable 133,605
 127,442
Other receivables 36,712
 39,220
Fixed assets, net 120,627
 116,031
Derivative assets 41,179
 244,526
Other assets 53,699
 54,503
Total assets $27,124,372
 $26,690,204
     
Liabilities:    
Accrued interest payable $158,997
 $149,284
Debt outstanding:    
Short-term borrowings 3,607,726
 3,795,910
Long-term debt 19,210,793
 18,714,960
Subordinated deferrable debt 986,020
 742,410
Members’ subordinated certificates:  
  
Membership subordinated certificates 630,474
 630,448
Loan and guarantee subordinated certificates 505,485
 528,386
Member capital securities 221,170
 221,148
Total members’ subordinated certificates 1,357,129
 1,379,982
Total debt outstanding 25,161,668
 24,633,262
Deferred income 57,989
 65,922
Derivative liabilities 391,724
 275,932
Other liabilities 50,112
 59,951
Total liabilities 25,820,490
 25,184,351
     
Equity:    
CFC equity:  
  
Retained equity 1,276,882
 1,465,789
Accumulated other comprehensive income (147) 8,544
Total CFC equity 1,276,735
 1,474,333
Noncontrolling interests 27,147
 31,520
Total equity 1,303,882
 1,505,853
Total liabilities and equity $27,124,372
 $26,690,204
     
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.





NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY




(Dollars in thousands)Membership
Fees and
Educational
Fund
Patronage
Capital
Allocated
Members’
Capital
Reserve
Unallocated
Net Income
(Loss)
CFC
Retained
Equity
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Total
CFC
Equity
Non-controlling
Interests
Total
Equity
Balance as of May 31, 2019$2,982 $860,578 $759,097 $(345,775)$1,276,882 $(147)$1,276,735 $27,147 $1,303,882 
Net income (loss)1,000 96,310 48,223 (730,773)(585,240)— (585,240)(4,190)(589,430)
Other comprehensive loss— — — — — (1,763)(1,763)— (1,763)
Patronage capital retirement— (62,822)— — (62,822)— (62,822)(1,933)(64,755)
Other(789)— — — (789)— (789)1,677 888 
Balance as of May 31, 2020$3,193 $894,066 $807,320 $(1,076,548)$628,031 $(1,910)$626,121 $22,701 $648,822 
Cumulative effect from adoption of new accounting standard— — — (3,900)(3,900)— (3,900)— (3,900)
Balance as of June 1, 20203,193 894,066 807,320 (1,080,448)624,131 (1,910)622,221 22,701 644,922 
Net income900 89,761 102,429 618,577 811,667 — 811,667 2,311 813,978 
Other comprehensive income— — — — — 1,885 1,885 — 1,885 
Patronage capital retirement— (59,857)— — (59,857)— (59,857)(2,054)(61,911)
Other(968)— — — (968)— (968)1,973 1,005 
Balance as of May 31, 2021$3,125 $923,970 $909,749 $(461,871)$1,374,973 $(25)$1,374,948 $24,931 $1,399,879 
Net income1,200 88,583 152,537 553,525 795,845  795,845 2,692 798,537 
Other comprehensive income     2,283 2,283  2,283 
Patronage capital retirement (57,565)  (57,565) (57,565)(2,414)(59,979)
Other(938)   (938) (938)2,187 1,249 
Balance as of May 31, 2022$3,387 $954,988 $1,062,286 $91,654 $2,112,315 $2,258 $2,114,573 $27,396 $2,141,969 
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.



97
(Dollars in thousands) Membership
Fees and
Educational
Fund
 Patronage
Capital
Allocated
 Members’
Capital
Reserve
 Unallocated
Net Income
(Loss)
 CFC
Retained
Equity
 Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income
 Total
CFC
Equity
 Non-controlling
Interests
 Total
Equity
Balance as of May 31, 2016 $2,772
 $713,853
 $587,219
 $(513,610) $790,234
 $1,058
 $791,292
 $26,086
 $817,378
Net income 1,000
 90,441
 43,086
 175,379
 309,906
 
 309,906
 2,193
 312,099
Other comprehensive income 
 
 
 
 
 12,117
 12,117
 
 12,117
Patronage capital retirement 
 (42,593) 
 103
 (42,490) 
 (42,490) 
 (42,490)
Other (872) 
 
 
 (872) 
 (872) 573
 (299)
Balance as of May 31, 2017 $2,900
 $761,701
 $630,305
 $(338,128) $1,056,778
 $13,175
 $1,069,953
 $28,852
 $1,098,805
Net income 1,000
 95,012
 57,480
 301,694
 455,186
 
 455,186
 2,178
 457,364
Other comprehensive loss 
 
 
 
 
 (4,631) (4,631) 
 (4,631)
Patronage capital retirement 
 (45,220) 
 
 (45,220) 
 (45,220) 
 (45,220)
Other (955) 
 
 
 (955) 
 (955) 490
 (465)
Balance as of May 31, 2018 $2,945
 $811,493
 $687,785
 $(36,434) $1,465,789
 $8,544
 $1,474,333
 $31,520
 $1,505,853
Cumulative effect from adoption of new accounting standard 
 
 
 8,794
 8,794
 (8,794) 
 
 
Balance as of June 1, 2018 2,945
 811,493
 687,785
 (27,640) 1,474,583
 (250) 1,474,333
 31,520
 1,505,853
Net income (loss) 1,000
 96,592
 71,312
 (318,135) (149,231) 
 (149,231) (1,979) (151,210)
Other comprehensive income 
 
 
 
 
 103
 103
 
 103
Patronage capital retirement 
 (47,507) 
 
 (47,507) 
 (47,507) (2,908) (50,415)
Other (963) 
 
 
 (963) 
 (963) 514
 (449)
Balance as of May 31, 2019 $2,982
 $860,578
 $759,097
 $(345,775) $1,276,882
 $(147) $1,276,735
 $27,147
 $1,303,882
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.






NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
 Year Ended May 31,
(Dollars in thousands)202220212020
Cash flows from operating activities:   
Net income (loss)$798,537 $813,978 $(589,430)
   Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:   
    Amortization of deferred loan fees(8,211)(9,390)(9,309)
    Amortization of debt issuance costs and discount27,417 26,967 24,963 
Amortization of guarantee fee18,763 18,687 16,927 
    Depreciation and amortization7,553 7,959 9,238 
    Provision (benefit) for credit losses(17,972)28,507 35,590 
    Loss on early extinguishment of debt754 1,456 683 
    Fixed assets impairment — 31,284 
    Gain on sale of land — (7,713)
    Unrealized (gains) losses on equity and debt securities28,742 (1,015)(5,975)
    Derivative forward value (gains) losses(557,867)(621,946)734,278 
Advances on loans held for sale(214,486)(125,500)(151,110)
Proceeds from sales of loans held for sale170,686 125,500 151,110 
   Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
    Accrued interest receivable(3,562)9,282 16,467 
    Accrued interest payable8,278 (15,947)(19,378)
    Deferred income1,345 1,285 10,973 
   Other(9,184)(19,868)(29,383)
   Net cash provided by operating activities250,793 239,955 219,215 
Cash flows from investing activities:   
Advances on loans held for investment, net(1,592,447)(1,724,253)(785,190)
Investments in fixed assets, net(17,727)(9,862)(9,565)
Proceeds from sale of land — 21,268 
Purchase of trading securities(181,545)(397,522)(3,883)
Proceeds from sales and maturities of trading securities162,739 127,875 277,687 
Proceeds from redemption of equity securities 30,000 25,000 
Purchases of held-to-maturity debt securities — (76,339)
Proceeds from maturities of held-to-maturity debt securities — 69,726 
   Net cash used in investing activities(1,628,980)(1,973,762)(481,296)
Cash flows from financing activities:   
Proceeds from (repayments of) short-term borrowings ≤ 90 days, net270,405 808,252 (208,340)
Proceeds from short-term borrowings with original maturity > 90 days2,693,256 3,081,069 3,022,910 
Repayments of short-term borrowings with original maturity > 90 days(2,564,590)(3,269,210)(2,460,311)
Payments for issuance costs for revolving bank lines of credit(3,563)— (1,025)
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt, net of discount and issuance costs3,973,810 3,055,220 2,156,711 
Payments for retirement of long-term debt(3,054,366)(2,186,458)(1,675,288)
Payments made for early extinguishment of debt(754)(1,456)(683)
Payments for issuance costs for subordinated deferrable debt — (84)
Proceeds from issuance of members’ subordinated certificates1,364 14,292 9,621 
Payments for retirement of members’ subordinated certificates(21,863)(84,659)(24,572)
Payments for retirement of patronage capital(57,761)(59,889)(63,035)
Additions (repayments) for membership fees, net2 (12)(8)
   Net cash provided by financing activities1,235,940 1,357,149 755,896 
Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash(142,247)(376,658)493,815 
Beginning cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash303,361 680,019 186,204 
Ending cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash$161,114 $303,361 $680,019 
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.


98

 
Year Ended May 31,
(Dollars in thousands)
2019
2018
2017
Cash flows from operating activities:
 
 
 
Net income (loss) $(151,210) $457,364
 $312,099
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:      
Amortization of deferred loan fees (10,009) (11,296) (14,072)
Amortization of debt issuance costs and deferred charges 10,439
 10,456
 9,484
Amortization of discount on long-term debt 10,605
 10,164
 9,501
Amortization of issuance costs for bank revolving lines of credit 5,324
 5,346
 5,531
Depreciation and amortization 9,305
 7,931
 7,173
Provision (benefit) for loan losses (1,266) (18,575) 5,978
Results of operations of foreclosed assets 
 
 1,749
Loss on early extinguishment of debt 7,100
 
 
Unrealized losses on equity securities 1,799
 
 
Derivative forward value (gains) losses 319,730
 (306,002) (179,381)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:      
Accrued interest receivable (6,163) (15,949) 1,778
Accrued interest payable 9,713
 11,808
 4,480
Deferred income 2,077
 3,246
 9,393
Other (10,401) 741
 5,855
Net cash provided by operating activities 197,043
 155,234
 179,568
Cash flows from investing activities:      
Advances on loans, net (738,171) (811,164) (1,145,673)
Investment in fixed assets (14,725) (15,194) (17,793)
Net cash proceeds from sale of foreclosed assets 
 
 51,042
Net proceeds from time deposits 100,000
 125,000
 114,000
Purchases of held-to-maturity investments (80,123) (510,598) 
Proceeds from maturities of held-to-maturity investments 35,340
 1,394
 
Net cash used in investing activities (697,679) (1,210,562) (998,424)
Cash flows from financing activities:      
Proceeds from (repayments of) short-term borrowings, net (452,618) 126,211
 409,871
Proceeds from short-term borrowings with original maturity greater than 90 days 1,652,005
 1,331,910
 1,003,185
Repayments of short term-debt with original maturity greater than 90 days (1,387,571) (1,005,111) (1,009,004)
Payments for issuance costs for revolving bank lines of credit (2,382) (2,441) (2,548)
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt, net of discount and issuance costs 3,281,595
 2,349,885
 2,923,868
Payments for retirement of long-term debt (2,806,639) (1,611,002) (2,460,730)
Payments made for early extinguishment of debt (7,100) 
 
Payments for issuance costs for subordinated deferrable debt (6,535) 
 (68)
Proceeds from issuance of subordinated debt 250,000
 
 
Proceeds from issuance of members’ subordinated certificates 1,986
 6,136
 3,626
Payments for retirement of members’ subordinated certificates (24,861) (45,180) (28,220)
Payments for retirement of patronage capital (49,860) (44,667) (41,871)
Repayments for membership fees, net (4) (10) 
Net cash provided by financing activities 448,016
 1,105,731
 798,109
Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash (52,620) 50,403
 (20,747)
Beginning cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash 238,824
 188,421
 209,168
Ending cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash $186,204
 $238,824
 $188,421
       
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.




NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS


 Year Ended May 31,
(Dollars in thousands)202220212020
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:   
Cash paid for interest$668,276 $687,145 $805,086 
Cash paid for income taxes3 219 20 
Noncash financing and investing activities:
     Net decrease in debt service reserve funds/debt service reserve certificates$ $— $2,560 
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.


99
  Year Ended May 31,
(Dollars in thousands) 2019 2018 2017
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:      
Cash paid for interest $801,966
 $766,059
 $712,742
Cash paid for income taxes 112
 321
 407
Noncash financing and investing activities:      
Loan provided in connection with the sale of foreclosed assets $
 $
 $60,000
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.






NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS







NOTE 1—SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES


The Company


National Rural Utilities Cooperative Finance Corporation (“CFC”) is a tax-exempt member-owned cooperative association incorporated under the laws of the District of Columbia in April 1969. CFC’s principal purpose is to provide its members with financing to supplement the loan programs of the Rural Utilities Service (“RUS”) of the United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”). CFC makes loans to its rural electric members so they can acquire, construct and operate electric distribution systems, electric generation and transmission (“power supply”) systems and related facilities. CFC also provides its members with credit enhancements in the form of letters of credit and guarantees of debt obligations. As a cooperative, CFC is owned by and exclusively serves its membership, which consists of not-for-profit entities or subsidiaries or affiliates of not-for-profit entities. CFC is exempt from federal income taxes.


National Cooperative Services Corporation (“NCSC”) is a taxable cooperative incorporated in 1981 in the District of Columbia as a member-owned cooperative association. NCSC’s principal purpose is to provide financing to members of CFC, entities eligible to be members of CFC and the for-profit and nonprofit entities that are owned, operated or controlled by or provide significant benefit to certain members of CFC. NCSC’s membership consists of distribution systems, power supply systems and statewide and regional associations that are members of CFC. CFC is the primary source of funding for NCSC and manages NCSC’s business operations under a management agreement that is automatically renewable on an annual basis unless terminated by either party. NCSC pays CFC a fee and, in exchange, CFC reimburses NCSC for loan losses under a guarantee agreement. As a taxable cooperative, NCSC pays income tax based on its reported taxable income and deductions. NCSC is headquartered with CFC in Dulles, Virginia.


Rural Telephone Finance Cooperative (“RTFC”) is a taxable Subchapter T cooperative association originally incorporated in South Dakota in 1987 and reincorporated as a member-owned cooperative association in the District of Columbia in 2005. RTFC’s principal purpose is to provide financing for its rural telecommunications members and their affiliates. RTFC’s membership consists of a combination of not-for-profit and for-profit entities. CFC is the sole lender to and manages the business operations of RTFC through a management agreement that is automatically renewable on an annual basis unless terminated by either party. RTFC pays CFC a fee and, in exchange, CFC reimburses RTFC for loan losses under a guarantee agreement. As permitted under Subchapter T of the Internal Revenue Code, RTFC pays income tax based on its net income, excluding patronage-sourced earnings allocated to its patrons. RTFC is headquartered with CFC in Dulles, Virginia.


Basis of Presentation and Use of Estimates


The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordanceconformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”). The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and related disclosures during the period. Management's most significant estimates and assumptions involve determining the allowance for loan losses andcredit losses. These estimates are based on information available as of the fair valuedate of the consolidated financial assets and liabilities. Actualstatements. While management makes its best judgments, actual amounts or results could differ from these estimates. Certain reclassifications haveand updates have been made to the presentation of information in prior periods to conform to the current period presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on prior years’ net income (loss) or equity.


Other Matters

For the years ended May 31, 2021 and 2020, we made corrections to the consolidated statements of cash flows to present the gross amount of advances on and proceeds from sales of loans held for sale. We concluded that the corrections were not material.



100

NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

COVID-19

Although most health and safety restrictions in response to COVID-19 have been lifted, we cannot predict the potential future impact that the COVID-19 pandemic may have on our operations and financial performance, or the specific ways the pandemic may uniquely impact our members. We continue to closely monitor developments, all of which continue to involve significant uncertainties that depend on future developments, which include, among others, the severity and duration of the current COVID-19 resurgence and its impact on the overall economy and other industry sectors; vaccination rates; the longer-term efficacy of vaccinations; and the potential emergence of new, more transmissible or severe variants.

Principles of Consolidation


The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of CFC, variable interest entities (“VIEs”) where CFC is the primary beneficiary and subsidiary entities created and controlled by CFC to hold foreclosed assets. CFC didhas not have anyhad entities that held foreclosed assets as of May 31, 2019 or May 31, 2018.since fiscal year 2017. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. NCSC and RTFC are VIEs that are required to be consolidated by CFC. Unless stated otherwise, references to “we, “our” or “us” relate to CFC and its consolidated entities.





NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS






Variable Interest Entities


A VIE is an entity that has a total equity investment at risk that is not sufficient to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support provided by another party, or where the group of equity holders does not have:have (i) the ability to make decisions about the entity’s activities that most significantly impact its economic performance; (ii) the obligation to absorb the entity’s expected losses; or (iii) the right to receive the entity’s expected residual returns.


NCSC and RTFC meet the definition of variable interest entitiesVIEs because they do not have sufficient equity investment at risk to finance their activities without additional financial support. When evaluating an entity for possible consolidation, we must determine whether or not we have a variable interest in the entity. If it is determined that we do not have a variable interest in the entity, no further analysis is required and we do not consolidate the entity. If we have a variable interest in the entity, we must evaluate whether we are the primary beneficiary based on an assessment of quantitative and qualitative factors. We are considered the primary beneficiary holder if we have a controlling financial interest in the VIE that provides (i) the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance and (ii) the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. We consolidate the results of NCSC and RTFC with CFC because CFC is the primary beneficiary holder.


Cash and Cash Equivalents


Cash, certificates of deposit due from banks and other investments with original maturities of less than 90 days are classified as cash and cash equivalents.


Restricted Cash


Restricted cash, which consists primarily of member funds held in escrow for certain specifically designed cooperative programs, totaled $8 million as of both May 31, 20192022 and 2018.2021.

Time Deposits

Time deposits are deposits that we make with financial institutions in interest-bearing accounts. These deposits have a maturity of less than one year as of the reporting date and are valued at carrying value, which approximates fair value.


Investment Securities


We currently hold investments inOur investment securities portfolio consists of equity and debt securities. We record purchases and sales of securities on a trade-date basis. The accounting and measurement framework for investment securities differs depending on the security type and the classification.

Our equity securities consist of investments in Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (“Farmer Mac”) Series A common stock and Farmer Mac Series A, Series B and Series C non-cumulative preferred stock. We previously had investments in equity securities that were classified as available for sale as of May 31, 2018. The unrealized gains and losses on these securities were recorded in other comprehensive income. Effective with our June 1, 2018 adoption of the financial instrument accounting standard on the recognition and measurement of financial assets and financial liabilities, unrealized gains and losses on equity securities are required to be recorded in earnings. Equity securities are carriedreported at fair value on our consolidated balance sheets with unrealized gains and losses recorded as a component of other non-interest income.

Our investment All of our debt securities were classified as HTM consisttrading as of investments in certificates of deposit with maturities greater than 90 days, commercial paper, corporateMay 31, 2022 and 2021. Accordingly, we also report our debt securities commercial mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”) and other asset-backed securities (“ABS”). We currently classify and account forat fair value on our investments in debt securities as held to maturity (“HTM”) because we have the positive intent and ability to hold these securities to maturity. If we acquire debt securities that we may sell prior to maturity in response to changes in our investment strategy, liquidity needs, credit risk mitigating considerations,consolidated balance





101


NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS






market risk profile or for other reasons, we would classify such securitiessheets and record unrealized gains and losses as available for sale. We report debt securities classified as HTM on our consolidated balance sheets at amortized cost.a component of non-interest income. Interest income including amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts, is generally recognized over the contractual life of the securities based on the effective yield method.
We regularly evaluate our investment securities whose fair value has declined below the amortized cost to assess whether the decline in fair value is other than temporary. We recognize any other-than-temporary impairment amounts in earnings.


Loans to Members


Loans that management has theWe originate loans to members and classify loans as held for investment or held for sale based on management’s intent and ability to sell or hold the loan for the foreseeable future or until maturity or payoffpayoff. Loans that we have the ability and intent to hold for the foreseeable future are consideredclassified as held for investment. Loans held for investment and are carried atreported based on the outstanding unpaid principal balance, net of unamortizedprincipal charge-offs, and deferred loan origination costs. We classify and account for loans to members as held for investment. Deferred loan origination costs are amortized using the straight-line method, which approximates the effective interest method, into interest income over the life of the loan. Loans that we intend to sell or for which we do not have the ability and intent to hold for the foreseeable future are classified as held for sale and are recorded at the lower of cost or fair value. These loan sales are made at par value, concurrently or within a short period of time with the closing of the loan or participation agreement.


Nonperforming LoansAccrued Interest Receivable


As permitted by the Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 326, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses, the current expected credit loss (“CECL”) model, we elected to continue reporting accrued interest on loans separately on our consolidated balance sheets as a component of the line item accrued interest receivable rather than as a component of loans to members. Accrued interest receivable amounts generally represent three months or less of accrued interest on loans outstanding. Because our policy is to write off past-due accrued interest receivable in a timely manner, we elected not to measure an allowance for credit losses for accrued interest receivable on loans outstanding, which totaled $94 million and $93 million as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. We also elected to exclude accrued interest receivable from the credit quality disclosures required under CECL.

Interest Income

Interest income on performing loans is accrued and recognized as interest income based on the contractual rate of interest. Loan origination costs and nonrefundable loan fees that meet the definition of loan origination fees are deferred and generally recognized in interest income as yield adjustments over the period to maturity of the loan using the effective interest method.

Troubled Debt Restructurings

A loan modification is considered past duea troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”) if the borrower is experiencing financial difficulties and a fullconcession is granted to the borrower that we would not otherwise consider. Under CECL, we are required to estimate an allowance for lifetime expected credit losses for the loans in our portfolio, including TDR loans. As discussed below under “Allowance for Credit Losses—Loan Portfolio—Asset-Specific Allowance,” TDR loans are evaluated on an individual basis in estimating expected credit losses. Credit losses for anticipated TDRs are accounted for similarly to TDRs and are identified when there is a reasonable expectation that a TDR will be executed with the borrower and when we expect the modification to affect the timing or amount of payments and/or the payment of interest and principal is not received within 30 days of its due date. Loans are classifiedterm.

We generally classify TDR loans as nonperforming when the collection of interest and principal has become 90 days past due; court proceedings indicate that collection of interest and principal in accordance with the contractual terms is unlikely; or the full and timely collection of interest or principal becomes otherwise due.

Once a loan is classified as nonperforming, we typically place the loan on nonaccrual status, and reverse any accrued and unpaid interest recorded during the periodalthough in which the loan ismany cases such loans were already classified as nonperforming. We generally apply all cash received during the nonaccrual periodnonperforming prior to the reduction of principal, thereby foregoing interest income recognition. The decisionmodification. These loans may be returned to return a loan to accrualperforming status is determined on a case-by-case basis.

We fully charge off or write down loans to the estimated net realizable value in the period that it becomes evident that collectability of the full contractual amount is highly unlikely; however, our efforts to recover all charged-off amounts may continue. The determination to write off all or a portion of a loan balance is made based on various factors on a case-by-case basis including, but not limited to, cash flow analysis and the fair valueaccrual of collateral securinginterest resumed if the borrower’s loans.

Impaired Loans

A loan is considered impaired when, based on current informationborrower performs under the modified terms for an extended period of time, and events, we determine that it is probable that we will be unableexpect the borrower to collect all interest and principal amounts due as scheduledcontinue to perform in accordance with the contractual terms ofmodified terms. In certain limited circumstances in which a TDR loan is current at the modification date, the loan agreement, other than an insignificant delay in payment or insignificant shortfall in payment amount. Factors considered in determining impairment may include, but are not limited to:remain on accrual status at the time of modification.

the review of the borrower’s audited financial statements and interim financial statements if available,
the borrower’s payment history,
communication with the borrower,
economic conditions in the borrower’s service territory,
pending legal action involving the borrower,
restructure agreements between us and the borrower, and
estimates of the value of the borrower’s assets that have been pledged as collateral to secure our loans.

We recognize interest income on impaired loans on a case-by-case basis. An impaired loan to a borrower that is nonperforming will typically be placed on nonaccrual status and we will reverse all accrued and unpaid interest. We generally apply all cash received during the nonaccrual period to the reduction of principal, thereby foregoing interest





102


NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS






Nonperforming Loans
income recognition.
We classify loans as nonperforming when contractual principal or interest is 90 days past due or when we believe the collection of principal and interest in full is not reasonably assured. When a loan is classified as nonperforming, we generally place the loan on nonaccrual status. Interest accrued but not collected at the date a loan is placed on nonaccrual status is reversed against current-period interest income. Interest income may beon nonaccrual loans is subsequently recognized on anonly upon the receipt of cash payments. However, if we believe the ultimate collectability of the loan principal is in doubt, cash received is applied against the principal balance of the loan. Nonaccrual loans generally are returned to accrual basisstatus when principal and interest becomes and remains current for restructured impaired loans wherea specified period and repayment of the borrowerremaining contractual principal and interest is performing and is expected to continue to perform based on agreed-upon terms.reasonably assured.


Charge-Offs

We may modify the termscharge off loans or a portion of a loan to maximizewhen we determine that the collectionloan is uncollectible. The charge-off of uncollectible principal amounts due when a borrower is experiencing financial difficulties. Concessionary modifications are classified as troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”) unless the modification results in onlya reduction to the allowance for credit losses for our loan portfolio. Recoveries of previously charged off principal amounts result in an insignificant delay in paymentsincrease to be received. All of our restructured loans are considered TDRs.the allowance.


Allowance for Credit Losses—Loan LossesPortfolio


TheCurrent Allowance Methodology

Beginning June 1, 2020, the allowance for loancredit losses representsis determined based on management’s current estimate of probableexpected credit losses inherentover the remaining contractual term, adjusted as appropriate for estimated prepayments, of loans in our loan portfolio which consistsas of CFC, NCSC and RTFCeach balance sheet date. The allowance for credit losses for our loan portfolio segments.is reported on our consolidated balance sheet as a valuation account that is deducted from loans to members to present the net amount we expect to collect over the life of our loans. We immediately recognize an allowance for expected credit losses upon origination of a loan. Adjustments to the allowance each period for changes in our estimate of lifetime expected credit losses are recognized in earnings through the provision for credit losses presented on our consolidated statements of operations.

We estimate our allowance for lifetime expected credit losses for our loan portfolio using a probability of default/loss given default methodology. Our allowance for loancredit losses for our portfolio segments consists of a collective allowance and an asset-specific allowance. The collective allowance is established for loans in our portfolio that share similar risk characteristics and are not individually impaired andtherefore evaluated on a specificcollective, or pool, basis in measuring expected credit losses. The asset-specific allowance is established for loans identifiedin our portfolio that do not share similar risk characteristics with other loans in our portfolio and are therefore evaluated on an individual basis in measuring expected credit losses. Expected credit losses are estimated based on historical experience, current conditions and forecasts, if applicable, that affect the collectibility of the reported amount.

Since inception in 1969, CFC has experienced limited defaults and losses as individually impaired. We increase or decrease the allowance for loan losses by recording a provision or benefit for loan lossesutility sector generally tends to be less sensitive to changes in the statement of operations. We record charge-offs against the allowance for loan losses when management determines that any portion of a loan is uncollectible. We add subsequent recoveries, if any,economy than other sectors largely due to the allowanceessential nature of the service provided. The losses we have incurred were not tied to economic factors, but rather to distinct operating issues related to each borrower. Given that our borrowers’ creditworthiness, and accordingly our loss experience, has not correlated to specific underlying macroeconomic variables, such as U.S. unemployment rates or gross domestic product (“GDP”) growth, we have not made adjustments to our historical loss rates for any economic forecast. We consider the need, however, to adjust our historical loss information for differences in the specific characteristics of our existing loan portfolio based on an evaluation of relative qualitative factors, such as differences in the composition of our loan portfolio, our underwriting standards, problem loan trends, the quality of our credit review function, as well as changes in the regulatory environment and other pertinent external factors that may impact the amount of future credit losses.




103

NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Collective Allowance


We employ a quantitative methodology and a qualitative framework to measure the collective component of our allowance for expected credit losses. The collective allowance is established, by loan portfolio segment, using an internal model to estimate probable incurred losses asfirst element in our quantitative methodology involves the segmentation of each balance sheet date. We further stratify our loan portfolio segments and group loans into loan pools based on member borrower type—distribution, power supply, telecommunications, and statewide and associates—as we consider our members with the same operations tothat share similar risk characteristics. We delineatedisaggregate our loan portfolio into segments that reflect the member borrower type, which is based on the utility sector of the borrower because the key operational, infrastructure, regulatory, environmental, customer and financial risks of each sector are similar in nature. Our primary member borrower types consist of CFC electric distribution, CFC electric power supply, CFC statewide and associate, NCSC and RTFC telecommunications. Our portfolio segments align with the sectors generally seen in the utilities industry. We further stratify each portfolio into loan pools based on our internal borrower risk ratings, as our borrower risk ratings provide important information on the collectibility of each of our loan pools by borrower risk rating andportfolio segments. We then apply loss factors, toconsisting of the outstanding principal balance at the end of each reporting period to determine the collective allowance for loan losses. The loss factors consist of a probability of default orand loss given default, rate,to the scheduled loan-level amortization amounts over the life of the loans for each of our loan pools. Below we discuss the source and basis for the key inputs, which include borrower risk ratings and the loss given default, or loss severity or recovery,factors, in measuring expected credit losses for eachour loan pool. We derive the total collective loss estimate by applying the default rate, based on a five-year loss emergence period, and recovery rate, based on our historical experience, to each loan pool. Following is additional information on the key inputs and assumptions used in determining our collective allowance for loan losses.portfolio.


InternalBorrower Risk RatingsAs part of our credit risk-management process, we regularlyWe evaluate each borrower and loan facility in our loan portfolio and assign an internal borrower and loan facility risk rating. Our borrowerratings based on consideration of a number of quantitative and qualitative factors. Each risk rating is reassessed annually following the receipt of the borrower’s audited financial statements; however, interim risk-rating adjustments may occur as a result of updated information affecting a borrower’s ability to fulfill its obligations or other significant developments and trends. Our internally assigned borrower risk ratings are intended to reflectassess the general creditworthiness of the borrower and probability of default. We engage an independent third partyuse our internal borrower risk ratings, which we map to perform an annual reviewthe equivalent credit ratings by external rating agencies, to differentiate risk within each of a sample of borrowersour portfolio segments and loan facilities to corroboratepools. We provide additional information on our internally assigned risk ratings. Theborrower risk ratings are based on quantitative and qualitative factors, including the general financial conditionbelow in “Note 4—Loans.”

Probability of the borrower; our judgment of the quality of the borrower’s management; our judgment of the borrower’s competitive position within its service territory and industry; our estimate of the potential impact of proposed regulation and litigation; and other factors specific to individual borrowers or classes of borrowers.
Loss Emergence PeriodDefault: The loss emergence period represents the average time between when a loss-triggering event, such as a successful new investment or expansion of services, a severe weather event or deterioration in operations, occurs and the problem loan is charged-off, restructured or otherwise resolved. Our loss emergence period of five years is based on CFC’s historical average loss emergence period.
Default Rates: Because we have a limited history of defaults to develop reasonable and supportable estimated probability of default, rates foror default rate, represents the likelihood that a borrower will default over a particular time horizon. Because of our existing loan portfolio,limited default history, we utilize third-party default data for the utility sector as a proxy to estimate probability of default rates for each of our loan portfolio segments.pools. The third-party default data providesprovide historical expected default rates, based on credit ratings and remaining maturities of outstanding bonds, for the utility sector. We alignBased on the mapping and alignment of our internal borrower risk ratings to theequivalent credit ratings provided in the third-party utility default rate table, andwe apply the corresponding cumulative default rates for our estimated average loss emergence periodto the scheduled amortization amounts over the remaining term of five years tothe loans in each of our loan pools.

Recovery RatesLoss Given Default: WeThe loss given default, or loss severity, represents the estimated loss, net of recoveries, on a loan that would be realized in the event of a borrower default. While we utilize third-party default data, we utilize our internallifetime historical loss experience to estimate loss given default, or the recovery rate, for each of our loan portfolio segments, as wesegments. We believe it providesour internal historical loss severity rates provide a more reliable estimate than third-party loss severity data due to the organizational structure and operating environment of rural utility cooperatives, our lending practice of generally requiring a senior security position on the assets and revenue of borrowers for long-term loans, the investment our member borrowers have in CFC and therefore the collaborative approach we generally take in working with members in the event that a default occurs.

In addition to the quantitative methodology used in our collective measurement of expected credit losses, management performs a qualitative evaluation and analyses of relevant factors, such as changes in risk-management practices, current and past underwriting standards, specific industry issues and trends and other subjective factors. Based on our assessment, we did not make a qualitative adjustment to the collective allowance for credit losses measured under our quantitative methodology as of May 31, 2022 or May 31, 2021.

Asset-Specific Allowance

We generally consider nonperforming loans as well as loans that have been or are anticipated to be modified under a troubled debt restructuring for individual evaluation given the risk characteristics of such loans. Factors we consider in





104


NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS






measuring the extent of expected credit loss include the payment status, the collateral value, the borrower’s financial condition, guarantor support, the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due, anticipated modifications of payment structure or term for troubled borrowers, and recoveries if they can be reasonably estimated. We generally requiring a senior security position onmeasure the assets and revenues of borrowers for long-term loans, and the approach we take in working with borrowers that may be experiencing operational or financial issues. The historical recovery rates for each portfolio segment may be adjusted based on management’s consideration and assessment of current conditions and relevant factors, suchexpected credit loss as recent trends in credit performance, historical variability of recovery rates and additional analysis of long-term loss severity experience, changes in risk management practices, current and past underwriting standards, specific industry issues and trends and general economic conditions.

Specific Allowance

The specific allowance for individually impaired loans that are not collateral dependent is calculated based on the difference between the recorded investmentamortized cost basis in the loan and the present value of the expected future cash flows from the borrower, which is generally discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate. Ifrate, or the loan is collateral dependent, we measure the impairment based on the current fair value of the collateral, less estimated selling costs. Loans are considered to be collateral dependent if repayment of the loan is collateral dependent.

Prior Allowance Methodology

Prior to June 1, 2020, the allowance for credit losses was determined based the incurred loss model under which management estimated probable losses inherent in our loan portfolio as of each balance sheet date. We used a probability of default/loss given default methodology in estimating probable losses based on a loss emergence period of five years. We utilized the same portfolio segments, borrower risk-rating framework, third-party default data and internal historical recovery rates under the incurred loss model that we use in determining the allowance based on the current expected to be provided solely by the underlying collateral and there are no other available and reliable sources of repayment.credit loss model.


Unadvanced Loan Commitments


Unadvanced commitments represent amounts for which we have approved and executed loan contracts, but the funds have not been advanced. The majority of the unadvanced commitments reported represent amounts that are subject to material adverse change clauses at the time of the loan advance. Prior to making an advance on these facilities, we would confirm that there has been no material adverse change in the business or condition, financial or otherwise, of the borrower since the time the loan was approved and confirm that the borrower is currently in compliance with loan terms and conditions. The remaining unadvanced commitments relate to line of credit loans that are not subject to a material adverse change clause at the time of each loan advance. As such, we would be required to advance amounts on these committed facilities as long as the borrower is in compliance with the terms and conditions of the loan commitment.


Unadvanced loan commitments related to line of credit loans are typically for periods not to exceed five years and are generally revolving facilities used for working capital and backup liquidity purposes. Historically, we have experienced a very low utilization rate on line of credit loan facilities, whether or not there is a material adverse change clause. Since we generally do not charge a fee on the unadvanced portion of the majority of our loan facilities, our borrowers will typically request long-term facilities to fund construction work plans and other capital expenditures for periods of up to five years and draw down on the facility over that time. In addition, borrowers will typically request an amount in excess of their immediate estimated loan requirements to avoid the expense related to seeking additional loan funding for unexpected items. These factors contribute to our expectation that the majority of the unadvanced line of credit loan commitments will expire without being fully drawn upon and that the total unadvanced amount does not necessarily represent future cash funding
requirements.


Reserve for Unadvanced Loan CommitmentsCredit Losses—Off-Balance Sheet Credit Exposures


We also maintain a reserve for credit losses for our off-balance sheet credit exposures related to unadvanced loan commitments and committed linesfinancial guarantees. Because our business processes and credit risks associated with our off-balance sheet credit exposures are essentially the same as for our loans, we measure expected credit losses for our off-balance sheet exposures, after adjusting for the probability of credit. Thisfunding these exposures, consistent with the methodology used for our funded outstanding exposures. We include the reserve is includedfor expected credit losses for our off-balance sheet credit exposures as a component of other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets, and changes in the reserve are included in other non-interest expense on our consolidated statements of operations. Our estimate of the reserve for potential losses on these commitments takes into consideration various factors, including the existence of a material adverse change clause, the historical utilization of the committed lines of credit, the probability of funding, historical loss experience on unadvanced loan commitments and other inputs along with management judgment consistent with the methodology used to determine our allowance for loan losses.sheets.


Fixed Assets


Fixed assets are recorded at cost less accumulated depreciation. We recognize depreciation expense for each category of our depreciable fixed assets on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life, which ranges from three to 40 years. We recognized depreciation expense of $8 million, $8 million and $9 million in fiscal years 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. We perform a fixed assets impairment assessment annually or more frequently, whenever events or circumstances indicate





105


NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS






that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. Based on our annual impairment assessment for fiscal years 2022 and 2021, management determined that there were no indicators of impairment of our fixed assets as of May 31, 2022 and 2021.
recognized depreciation expense of $9 million, $8 million and $7 million in fiscal year 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
The following table displays the components of our fixed assets. Our headquarters facility in Loudoun County, Virginia, which is owned by CFC, is included as a component of building and building equipment.

  May 31,
(Dollars in thousands) 2019 2018
Building and building equipment $50,167
 $50,210
Furniture and fixtures 6,012
 6,080
Computer software and hardware 71,915
 45,389
Other 1,069
 1,006
Depreciable fixed assets 129,163
 102,685
Less: Accumulated depreciation (53,695) (47,705)
Net depreciable fixed assets 75,468
 54,980
Land 23,796
 23,796
Software development in progress 21,363
 37,255
Fixed assets, net $120,627
 $116,031
Table 1.1: Fixed Assets

May 31,
(Dollars in thousands)20222021
Building and building equipment$50,177 $50,090 
Furniture and fixtures6,254 6,039 
Computer software and hardware55,101 54,582 
Other1,024 1,048 
Depreciable fixed assets112,556 111,759 
Less: Accumulated depreciation(73,258)(66,777)
Net depreciable fixed assets39,298 44,982 
Land23,796 23,796 
Software development in progress38,668 23,104 
Fixed assets, net$101,762 $91,882 
Assets Held for Sale

An asset is classified as held for sale when (i) management commits to a plan to sell the asset or business; (ii) the asset or business is available for sale in its present condition; (iii) the asset or business is actively marketed for sale at a reasonable price; (iv) the sale is expected to be completed within one year; and (v) it is unlikely significant changes to the plan will be made or that the plan will be withdrawn. Long-lived assets classified as held for sale are initially measured at the lower of their carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell. If the carrying value exceeds the estimated fair value less cost to sell in the period the held for sale criteria are met, an impairment charge is recorded equal to the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair value less cost to sell. Subsequent changes in the long-lived asset’s fair value less cost to sell is reported as an adjustment to the carrying amount to the extent that the adjusted carrying amount does not exceed the carrying amount of the long-lived asset at the time it was initially classified as held for sale.

On March 14, 2018, CFC entered into a purchase and sale agreement (“the agreement”), which was subsequently amended, for the sale of a parcel of land, consisting of approximately 28 acres, located in Loudoun County, Virginia. We designated the property, which has a carrying value of $14 million, as held for sale and reclassified it from fixed assets, net to other assets on our consolidated balance sheet. On July 22, 2019, we closed on the sale of the land and received net proceeds of $22 million, resulting in a gain of $8 million on the sale of this property.

Foreclosed Assets


Foreclosed assets acquired through our lending activities in satisfaction of indebtedness may be held in operating entities created and controlled by CFC and presented separately in our consolidated balance sheets under foreclosed assets, net. These assets are initially recorded at estimated fair value as of the date of acquisition. Subsequent to acquisition, foreclosed assets not classified as held for sale are evaluated for impairment, and the results of operations and any impairment are reported on our consolidated statements of operations under results of operations of foreclosed assets. When foreclosed assets meet the accounting criteria to be classified as held for sale, they are recorded at the lower of cost or fair value less estimated cost to sell at the date of transfer, with the amount at the date of transfer representing the new cost basis. Subsequent changes are recognized in our consolidated statements of operations under results of operations of foreclosed assets. We also review foreclosed assets classified as held for sale each reporting period to determine whether the existing carrying amounts are fully recoverable in comparison to estimated fair values. We did not carry any foreclosed assets on our consolidated balance sheet as of May 31, 20192022 or May 31, 2018.2021.



Securities Sold Under Repurchase Agreements



We enter into repurchase agreements to sell investment securities. These transactions are accounted for as collateralized financing transactions and are recorded on our consolidated balance sheets as part of short-term borrowings at the amounts at which the securities were sold.

NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS






Debt


We report debt at cost net of unamortized issuance costs and discounts or premiums. Issuance costs, discounts and premiums are deferred and amortized into interest expense using the effective interest method or a method approximating the effective interest method over the legal maturity of each bond issue. Short-term borrowings consist of borrowings with an original


106

NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

contractual maturity of one year or less and do not include the current portion of long-term debt. Borrowings with an original contractual maturity of greater than one year are classified as long-term debt.


Derivative Instruments


We are an end user of derivative financial instruments and do not engage in derivative trading. We use derivatives, primarily interest rate swaps and treasuryTreasury rate locks, to manage interest rate risk. Derivatives may be privately negotiated contracts, which are often referred to as over-the-counter (“OTC”) derivatives, or they may be listed and traded on an exchange. We generally engage in OTC derivative transactions.


In accordance with the accounting standards for derivatives and hedging activities, we record derivative instruments at fair value as either a derivative asset or derivative liability on our consolidated balance sheets. We report derivative asset and liability amounts on a gross basis based on individual contracts, which does not take into consideration the effects of master netting agreements or collateral netting. Derivatives in a gain position are reported as derivative assets on our consolidated balance sheets, while derivatives in a loss position are reported as derivative liabilities. Accrued interest related to derivatives is reported on our consolidated balance sheets as a component of either accrued interest receivable or accrued interest payable.


If we do not elect hedge accounting treatment, changes in the fair value of derivative instruments, which consist of net accrued periodic derivative cash settlements expense and derivative forward value amounts, are recognized in our consolidated statements of operations under derivative gains (losses). If we elect hedge accounting treatment for derivatives, we formally document, designate and assess the effectiveness of the hedge relationship. Changes in the fair value of derivatives designated as qualifying fair value hedges are recorded in earnings together with offsetting changes in the fair value of the hedged item and any related ineffectiveness. Changes in the fair value of derivatives designated as qualifying cash flow hedges are recorded as a component of other comprehensive income (“OCI”), to the extent that the hedge relationships are effective, and reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”) to earnings using the effective interest method over the term of the forecasted transaction. Any ineffectiveness in the hedging relationship is recognized as a component of derivative gains (losses) in our consolidated statement of operations.


We generally do not designate interest rate swaps, which represent the substantial majority of our derivatives, for hedge accounting. Accordingly, changes in the fair value of interest rate swaps are reported in our consolidated statements of operations under derivative gains (losses). Net periodic cash settlements expense related to interest rate swaps are classified as an operating activity in our consolidated statements of cash flows.


We typically designate treasuryTreasury rate locks as cash flow hedges of forecasted debt issuances or repricings. Changes in the fair value of treasury locks designated as cash flow hedges are recorded as a component of OCI and reclassified from AOCI into interest expense when the forecasted transaction occurs using the effective interest method. Any ineffectiveness is recognized as a component of derivative gains (losses) in our consolidated statements of operations.


Guarantee Liability


We maintain a guarantee liability that represents our contingent and noncontingent exposure related to guarantees and standby liquidity obligations associated with our members’ debt. The guarantee liability is included in the other liabilities line item on the consolidated balance sheet, and the provision for guarantee liability is reported in non-interest expense as a separate line item on the consolidated statement of operations.





NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS






The contingent portion of the guarantee liability represents management’s estimate of our exposure to losses within the guarantee portfolio. The methodology used to estimate the contingent guarantee liability is consistent with the methodology used to determine the allowance for loan losses.credit losses under the CECL model.




107

NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

We have recorded a noncontingent guarantee liability for all new or modified guarantees since January 1, 2003. Our noncontingent guarantee liability represents our obligation to stand ready to perform over the term of our guarantees and liquidity obligations that we have entered into or modified since January 1, 2003. Our noncontingent obligation is estimated based on guarantee and liquidity fees charged for guarantees issued, which represents management’s estimate of the fair value of our obligation to stand ready to perform. The fees are deferred and amortized using the straight-line method into interest income over the term of the guarantee.


Fair Value Valuation Processes


We present certain financial instruments at fair value, including equity and debt securities, and derivatives. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date (also referred to as an exit price). We have various processes and controls in place to ensure that fair value is reasonably estimated. We consider observable prices in the principal market in our valuations where possible. Fair value estimates were developed at the reporting date and may not necessarily be indicative of amounts that could ultimately be realized in a market transaction at a future date. With the exception of redeeming debt under early redemption provisions, terminating derivative instruments under early-termination provisions and allowing borrowers to prepay their loans, we held and intend to hold all financial instruments to maturity excluding common stock and preferred stock investments that have no stated maturity.maturity and our trading debt securities.


Fair Value Hierarchy


The fair value accounting guidance provides a three-level fair value hierarchy for classifying financial instruments. This hierarchy is based on the markets in which the assets or liabilities trade and whether the inputs to the valuation techniques used to measure fair value are observable or unobservable. Fair value measurement of a financial asset or liability is assigned a level based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are summarized below:


Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
Level 2: Observable market-based inputs, other than quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
Level 3: Unobservable inputs


The degree of management judgment involved in determining the fair value of a financial instrument is dependent upon the availability of quoted prices in active markets or observable market parameters. When quoted prices and observable data in active markets are not fully available, management’s judgment is necessary to estimate fair value. Changes in market conditions, such as reduced liquidity in the capital markets or changes in secondary market activities, may reduce the availability and reliability of quoted prices or observable data used to determine fair value.


Membership Fees


Members are charged a one-time membership fee based on member class. CFC distribution system members, power supply system members and national associations of cooperatives pay a $1,000 membership fee. CFC service organization members pay a $200 membership fee and CFC associates pay a $1,000 fee. RTFC voting members pay a $1,000 membership fee and RTFC associates pay a $100 fee. NCSC members pay a $100 membership fee. Membership fees are accounted for as members’ equity.







NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS






Financial Instruments with Off-Balance Sheet Risk


In the normal course of business, we are a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk to meet the financing needs of our member borrowers. These financial instruments include committed lines of credit, standby letters of credit and guarantees of members’ obligations.

Interest Income

Interest income on loans and investments is recognized using the effective interest method. The following table presents interest income, by interest-earning asset category, for fiscal years 2019, 2018 and 2017.


108

  Year Ended May 31,
(Dollars in thousands) 2019 2018 2017
Interest income by interest-earning asset type:      
Long-term fixed-rate loans(1)
 $1,012,277
 $1,000,492
 $980,173
Long-term variable-rate loans 41,219
 27,152
 19,902
Line of credit loans 57,847
 38,195
 25,389
TDR loans(2)
 846
 889
 905
Other income, net(3)
 (1,128) (1,185) (1,082)
Total loans 1,111,061
 1,065,543
 1,025,287
Cash, time deposits and investment securities 24,609
 11,814
 11,347
Total interest income $1,135,670
 $1,077,357
 $1,036,634
____________________________
(1) Includes loan conversion fees, which are generally deferred and recognized as interest income using the effective interest method.
(2) Troubled debt restructured (“TDR”) loans.
(3) Consists of late payment fees, commitment fees and net amortization of deferred loan fees and loan origination costs.

Deferred income of $58 million and $66 million as of May 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, consists primarily of deferred loan conversion fees totaling $52 million and $60 million, respectively. Deferred loan conversion fees are recognized in interest income using the effective interest method.























NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS






Interest Expense

The following table presents interest expense, by debt product type, for fiscal years 2019, 2018 and 2017.
  Year Ended May 31,
(Dollars in thousands) 2019 2018 2017
Interest expense by debt product type:(1)(2)
      
Short-term borrowings $92,854
 $50,616
 $26,684
Medium-term notes 133,797
 111,814
 99,022
Collateral trust bonds 273,413
 336,079
 340,854
Guaranteed Underwriter Program notes payable 147,895
 140,551
 142,661
Farmer Mac notes payable 90,942
 56,004
 33,488
Other notes payable 1,237
 1,509
 1,780
Subordinated deferrable debt 38,628
 37,661
 37,657
Subordinated certificates 57,443
 58,501
 59,592
Total interest expense $836,209
 $792,735
 $741,738
____________________________
(1) Includes amortization of debt discounts and debt issuance costs, which are generally deferred and recognized as interest expense using the effective interest method. Issuance costs related to dealer commercial paper, however, are recognized as interest expense immediately as incurred.
(2) Includes fees related to funding arrangements, such as up-front fees paid to banks participating in our committed bank revolving line of credit agreements. Depending on the nature of the fee, amounts may be deferred and recognized as interest expense ratably over the term of the arrangement or recognized immediately as incurred. 

Early Extinguishment of Debt


We redeem outstanding debt early from time to time to manage liquidity and interest rate risk. When we redeem outstanding debt early, we recognize a gain or loss related to the difference between the amount paid to redeem the debt and the net book value of the extinguished debt as a component of non-interest expense in the gain (loss) on early extinguishment of debt line item..


Income Taxes


While CFC is exempt under Section 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code, it is subject to tax on unrelated business taxable income. NCSC is a taxable cooperative that pays income tax on the full amount of its reportable taxable income and allowable deductions. RTFC is a taxable cooperative under Subchapter T of the Internal Revenue Code and is not subject to income taxes on income from patronage sources that is allocated to its borrowers, as long as the allocation is properly noticed and at least 20% of the amount allocated is retired in cash prior to filing the applicable tax return.


The income tax benefit (expense) recorded in the consolidated statement of operations represents the income tax benefit (expense) at the applicable combined federalfederal and state income tax rates resulting infrom a statutory tax rate. The federal statutory tax rate for both NCSC and RTFC was 21% for fiscal year 2019. The federal statutory tax rate for NCSCeach of fiscal years 2022, 2021 and RTFC was 29% and 12%, respectively, for fiscal year 2018 and the federal statutory tax rate for NCSC and RTFC was 34% and 20%, respectively, for fiscal year 2017.2020. Substantially all ofof the income tax expense recorded in our consolidated statements of operations relates to NCSC. NCSC had a deferred tax asset of $1 million and $2 million as of both May 31, 20192022 and 2018, primarily2021, respectively, primarily arising from differences in the accounting and tax treatment for derivatives. We believe that it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will be realized through taxable earnings.








NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





Recent Accounting Changes and Other Developments

New Accounting Standards Adopted in Fiscal Year 2019


Statement of Cash Flows—Restricted CashFinancial Instruments—Credit Losses, Troubled Debt Restructurings and Vintage Disclosures


In November 2016,March 2022, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows—Restricted Cash, 2022-02, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Troubled Debt Restructurings and Vintage Disclosures, which addresses the presentation of restricted cash in the statement of cash flows. The guidance requires that the statement of cash flows explain the change in the beginning-of-period and end-of period total of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash. Under previous guidance, we were required to explain the total change in cash and cash equivalents during the period. We adopted this guidance on June 1, 2018, on a retrospective basis. We made corresponding changes on our consolidated balance sheet to present a total for cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash.

Financial Instruments—Overall: Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities

In January 2016,amends areas identified by the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, Financial Instruments-Overall: Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, which amends certain aspects of the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of certain financial instruments, including equity investments and liabilities measured at fair value under the fair value option. Under this guidance, investments in equity securities must be measured at fair value through earnings, with certain exceptions, and entities can no longer classify investments in equity securities as available for sale or trading. We adopted this guidance on June 1, 2018 on a modified retrospective basis and recorded a cumulative-effect adjustment that increased retained earnings by $9 million as a result of the transition adjustment to reclassify unrealized gains related to our equity securities from AOCI to retained earnings. As a result of adopting this guidance, our investments in equity securities are no longer classified as available for sale and unrealized holding gains and losses are recorded in earnings. Previously, our equity securities were classified as available for sale and unrealized holding gains and losses were recorded in other comprehensive income.

Revenue from Contracts with Customers

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which modifies the guidance used to recognize revenue from contracts with customers for transfers of goods or services and transfers of nonfinancial assets. This guidance applies to all contracts with customers to provide goods or services in the ordinary course of business, except for certain contracts specifically excluded from the scope, including financial instruments, guarantees, insurance contracts and leases. As a financial institution, substantially all of our revenue is in the form of interest income derived from financial instruments, primarily our investments in loans and securities. We adopted this guidance on June 1, 2018. Given the scope exception for financial instruments, the adoption of the guidance did not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements or cash flows.

Accounting Standards Issued But Not Yet Adopted

Fair Value Measurement—Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement—Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement, which eliminates, adds and modifies certain disclosure requirements for fair value measurements as part of its post-implementation review of the accounting standard that introduced the CECL model. The amendments eliminate the accounting guidance for TDRs by creditors that have adopted the CECL model and enhance the disclosure framework project. The guidancerequirements for loan refinancings and restructurings made with borrowers experiencing financial difficulty. In addition, the amendments require disclosure of current-period gross writeoffs for financing receivables and net investment in leases by year of origination in the vintage disclosures. ASU 2022-02 is effective for public entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019,2022, including interim periods within those years.fiscal years for entities, such as CFC, that have adopted the CECL accounting standard. Early adoption, however, is permitted in any interim period orif an entity has adopted the CECL accounting standard. We expect to adopt the guidance for our fiscal year before the effective date. The guidance is effective for usyear beginning June 1, 2020. We2023. While the guidance will result in expanded disclosures, we do not expect an impact on our consolidated results of operation, financial condition or liquidity from adoption of this accounting standard.

Amendments of Certain U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Disclosure Guidance

In August 2021, the FASB issued ASU 2021-06, Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205), Financial Services—Depository and Lending (Topic 942), and Financial Services—Investment Companies (Topic 946), Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to SEC Final Rule Releases No. 33-10786, Amendments to Financial Disclosures About Acquired and Disposed Businesses, and No.33-10835, Update of Statistical Disclosures for Bank and Savings and Loan Registrants. This update amends certain SEC disclosure guidance that is included in the accounting standards codification to reflect the SEC’s recent issuance of rules intended to modernize and streamline disclosure requirements. We adopted the SEC’s guidance on the presentation of financial statements and update of statistical disclosures for bank and savings and loan registrants in conjunction with the completion of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021 (“2021 Form 10-K”), which we filed with the SEC on July 30, 2021. The adoption of this disclosure guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.


109

NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Reference Rate Reform

In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-04, Reference Rate Reform(Topic 848): Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting, which provides temporary optional expedients and exceptions for applying U.S. GAAP on contracts, hedging relationships and other transactions subject to modification due to the expected discontinuance of the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) and other reference rate reform changes to ease the potential accounting and financial burdens related to the expected transition in market reference rates. This guidance permits entities to elect not to apply certain modification accounting requirements to contracts affected by reference rate transition, if certain criteria are met. An entity that makes this election would not be required to remeasure modified contracts at the modification date or reassess a previous accounting determination. The guidance was effective upon issuance on March 12, 2020, and can generally be applied through December 31, 2022. We expect to apply certain of the practical expedients and are in the process of evaluating the timing and application of those elections. Based on our current assessment, we do not believe that the adoptionapplication of this guidance will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

NOTE 2—INTEREST INCOME AND INTEREST EXPENSE

The following table displays the components of interest income, by interest-earning asset type, and interest expense, by debt product type, presented on our consolidated statements of operations for fiscal years 2022, 2021 and 2020.

Table 2.1: Interest Income and Interest Expense
Year Ended May 31,
(Dollars in thousands)202220212020
Interest income:
Loans(1)
$1,125,292 $1,101,505 $1,129,883 
Investment securities15,951 15,096 21,403 
Total interest income1,141,243 1,116,601 1,151,286 
Interest expense:(2)(3)
Short-term borrowings18,265 14,730 77,995 
Long-term debt581,748 581,292 634,567 
Subordinated debt105,521 106,041 108,527 
Total interest expense705,534 702,063 821,089 
Net interest income$435,709 $414,538 $330,197 
____________________________
(1)Includes loan conversion fees, which are generally deferred and recognized in interest income over the period to maturity using the effective interest method, late payment fees, commitment fees and net amortization of deferred loan fees and loan origination costs.
(2)Includes amortization of debt discounts and debt issuance costs, which are generally deferred and recognized as interest expense over the period to maturity using the effective interest method. Issuance costs related to dealer commercial paper, however, are recognized in interest expense immediately as incurred.
(3)Includes fees related to funding arrangements, such as up-front fees paid to banks participating in our committed bank revolving line of credit agreements. Based on the nature of the fees, the amount is either recognized immediately as incurred or cash flows.deferred and recognized in interest expense ratably over the term of the arrangement.



Deferred income reported on our consolidated balance sheets of $44 million and $51 million as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, consists primarily of deferred loan conversion fees that totaled $37 million and $45 million as of each respective date.






110


NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS






Derivatives and Hedging—Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities

In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging—Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities, which expands the types of risk management strategies that qualify for hedge accounting treatment to more closely align the results of hedge accounting with the economics of certain risk management activities and simplifies certain hedge documentation and assessment requirement. It also eliminates the concept of separately recording hedge ineffectiveness and expands disclosure requirements. The guidance is effective for public entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those years. Early adoption is permitted in any interim period or fiscal year before the effective date. The guidance is effective for us beginning June 1, 2019. Hedge accounting is elective, and we currently apply hedge accounting on a limited basis, specifically when we enter into treasury rate lock agreements. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements or cash flows. If we continue to elect not to apply hedge accounting to our interest rate swaps, the guidance will not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements or cash flows.

Receivables—Nonrefundable Fees and Other Cost

In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-08, Receivables—Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs, which shortens the amortization period for the premium on certain callable debt securities to the earliest call date rather the maturity date. The guidance is applicable to any individual debt security, purchased at a premium, with an explicit and noncontingent call feature with a fixed price on a preset date. The guidance does not impact the accounting for purchased callable debt securities held at a discount; the discount will continue to amortize to the maturity date. The guidance is effective for public entities in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. This update is effective for us on June 1, 2019. Adoption of the guidance requires modified retrospection transition as of the beginning of the period of adoption through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements or cash flows.

Financial Instruments—Credit Losses: Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses: Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, which replaces the existing incurred credit loss model and establishes a single credit loss framework based on a current expected credit loss model for financial assets carried at amortized cost, including loans and held-to maturity debt securities. The current expected loss model requires an entity to estimate credit losses expected over the life of the credit exposure upon initial recognition of that exposure when the financial asset is originated or acquired, which will generally result in earlier recognition of credit losses. The guidance also amends the other-than-temporary model for available-for-sale debt securities by requiring the use of an allowance, rather than directly reducing the carrying value of the security. The new guidance also requires expanded credit quality disclosures. The new guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. This guidance is effective for us on June 1, 2020. While early adoption is permitted, we do not expect to elect that option. We are continuing to evaluate the impact of the guidance on our consolidated financial statements, including assessing and evaluating assumptions and models to estimate losses. Upon adoption of the guidance on June 1, 2020, we will be required to record a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings for the impact as of the date of adoption. The impact will depend on our portfolio composition and credit quality at the date of adoption, as well as forecasts at that time.

Leases

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases, which provides new guidance that is intended to improve financial reporting about leasing transactions. The new guidance requires the recognition of a right-of use asset and lease liability on the consolidated balance sheet by lessees for those leases classified as operating leases under previous guidance. It also requires new disclosures to help investors and other financial statement users better understand the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. The guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. This guidance is effective for us on June 1, 2019. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements or cash flows.
NOTE 2—VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES3—INVESTMENT SECURITIES


NCSCOur investment securities portfolio consists of debt securities classified as trading and RTFC meetequity securities with readily determinable fair values. We therefore record changes in the definitionfair value of our debt and equity securities in earnings and report these unrealized changes together with realized gains and losses from the sale of securities as a VIE because they do not have sufficient equity investment at riskcomponent of non-interest income in our consolidated statements of operations. For additional information on our investments in debt securities, see “Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.”

Debt Securities

Our debt securities portfolio, which is intended to finance their activities without financial support. CFC is the primaryserve as a supplemental source of funding for NCSCliquidity, consists of certificates of deposit with maturities greater than 90 days, commercial paper, corporate debt securities, municipality debt securities, commercial mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”), foreign government debt securities and other asset-backed securities (“ABS”). Pursuant to our investment policy guidelines, all fixed-income debt securities, at the sole sourcetime of funding for RTFC. Under the terms of management agreements with each company, CFC manages the business operations of NCSC and RTFC. CFC also unconditionally guarantees full indemnification for any loan losses of NCSC and RTFC pursuant to guarantee agreements with each company. CFC earns management and guarantee fees from its agreements with NCSC and RTFC.

All loans that require NCSC board approval also require CFC board approval. CFC is not a member of NCSC and does not elect directors to the NCSC board. If CFC becomes a member of NCSC, it would control the nomination process for one NCSC director. NCSC members elect directors to the NCSC boardpurchase, must be rated at least investment grade based on one vote for each member. NCSCexternal credit ratings from at least two of the leading global credit rating agencies, when available, or the corresponding equivalent, when not available. Securities rated investment grade, that is a Class C memberthose rated Baa3 or higher by Moody’s Investors Service (“Moody’s”) or BBB- or higher by S&P Global Inc. (“S&P”) or BBB- or higher by Fitch Ratings Inc. (“Fitch”), are generally considered by the rating agencies to be of CFC. All loans that require RTFC board approval also require approval by CFC for funding under RTFC’slower credit facilities with CFC. CFC is not a member of RTFC and does not elect directors to the RTFC board. RTFC is a non-voting associate of CFC. RTFC members elect directors to the RTFC board based on one vote for each member.risk than non-investment grade securities.


NCSC and RTFC creditors have no recourse against CFC in the event of a default by NCSC and RTFC, unless there is a guarantee agreement under which CFC has guaranteed NCSC or RTFC debt obligations to a third party. The following table provides information on incremental consolidated assetspresents the composition of our investment debt securities portfolio and liabilities of VIEs included in CFC’s consolidated financial statements, after intercompany eliminations,the fair value as of May 31, 20192022 and 2018.2021.


Table 3.1: Investments in Debt Securities, at Fair Value
  May 31,
(Dollars in thousands) 2019
2018
Total loans outstanding $1,087,988
 $1,149,574
Other assets 10,963
 10,280
Total assets $1,098,951
 $1,159,854
     
Long-term debt $6,000
 $8,000
Other liabilities 33,385
 33,923
Total liabilities $39,385
 $41,923
May 31,
(Dollars in thousands)20222021
Debt securities, at fair value:
Certificates of deposit$ $1,501 
Commercial paper9,985 12,365 
Corporate debt securities487,172 497,944 
Commercial Agency MBS(1)
7,815 8,683 
U.S. state and municipality debt securities27,778 11,840 
Foreign government debt securities967 999 
Other ABS(2)
32,429 42,843 
Total debt securities trading, at fair value$566,146 $576,175 

____________________________
The following table provides information(1)Consists of securities backed by the Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie Mae”) and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“Freddie Mac”).
(2)Consists primarily of securities backed by auto lease loans, equipment-backed loans, auto loans and credit card loans.

We recognized net unrealized losses on CFC’s credit commitments to NCSCour debt securities of $27 million and RTFC, and its potential exposure to loss as of$3 million for the years ended May 31, 20192022 and 2018.2021, respectively, and net unrealized gains of $8 million for the year ended May 31, 2020.

We sold $5 million of debt securities at fair value during the year ended May 31, 2022, and recorded realized gains related to the sale of these securities of less than $1 million for the year ended May 31, 2022. We sold $6 million of debt securities at fair value during the year ended May 31, 2021, and recorded realized losses related to the sale of these securities of less than $1 million for the year ended May 31, 2021. We sold $239 million of debt securities at fair value during the year ended





111


NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS






  May 31,
(Dollars in thousands) 2019 2018
CFC credit commitments $5,500,000
 $5,500,000
Outstanding commitments:    
Borrowings payable to CFC(1)
 1,059,629
 1,116,465
 Credit enhancements:    
CFC third-party guarantees 11,318
 12,005
Other credit enhancements 14,251
 14,655
Total credit enhancements(2)
 25,569
 26,660
Total outstanding commitments 1,085,198
 1,143,125
CFC available credit commitments $4,414,802
 $4,356,875
May 31, 2020, and recorded realized gains related to the sale of these securities of $3 million during the year ended May 31, 2020.
____________________________
(1) Borrowings payablePledged Collateral—Debt securities

Under master repurchase agreements with counterparties, we can obtain short-term funding by selling investment-grade corporate debt securities from our investment portfolio subject to CFCan obligation to repurchase the same or similar securities at an agreed-upon price and date. Because we retain effective control over the transferred securities, transactions under these repurchase agreements are eliminated in consolidation.accounted for as collateralized financing agreements (i.e., secured borrowings) and not as a sale and subsequent repurchase of securities. The obligation to repurchase the securities is reflected as a component of our short-term borrowings on our consolidated balance sheets. The aggregate fair value of debt securities underlying repurchase transactions is parenthetically disclosed on our consolidated balance sheets.
(2) Excludes interest due on these instruments.

CFC loans to NCSC and RTFC are secured by all assets and revenue of NCSC and RTFC. CFC’s maximum potential exposure, including interest due, for the credit enhancements totaled $27 million. The maturities for obligations guaranteed by CFC extend through 2031.
NOTE 3—INVESTMENT SECURITIES


We currently hold investmentshad no borrowings under repurchase transactions outstanding as of May 31, 2022; therefore, we had no debt securities in equity and debt securities. We record purchases and sales of our investment portfolio pledged as collateral as of May 31, 2022. We had short-term borrowings under repurchase transactions of $200 million as of May 31, 2021. The debt securities underlying these transactions had an aggregate fair value of $211 million as of this date, and we repurchased the securities on a trade-date basis. Investments are denominated in US dollars exclusively. The accounting and measurement framework for investment securities differs depending on the security type and the classification. See “Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” for additional information on our investment securitiesJune 2, 2021.


Equity Securities


The following table presents the fair valuecomposition of our equity securities, all of which had readily determinablesecurity holdings and the fair values,value as of May 31, 20192022 and 2018.2021.

  May 31,
(Dollars in thousands) 2019 2018
Equity securities at fair value:    
Farmer Mac—Series A, B and C non-cumulative preferred stock $82,445
 $82,352
Farmer Mac—class A common stock 5,088
 6,980
Total equity securities at fair value $87,533
 $89,332
Table 3.2: Investments in Equity Securities, at Fair Value

May 31,
(Dollars in thousands)20222021
Equity securities, at fair value:
Farmer Mac—Series C non-cumulative preferred stock$25,520 $27,450 
Farmer Mac—Class A common stock8,238 7,652 
Total equity securities, at fair value$33,758 $35,102 

We recognized net unrealized losses on our investments in equity securities of $1 million for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2022, net unrealized gains of $4 million for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2021 and net unrealized losses of $2 million for thefiscal year ended May 31, 2019.2020. These unrealized amounts are reported as a component of non-interest income on our consolidated statements of operations.


We recorded unrealized losses on our investments in equity securities of $3 million in other comprehensive income during the year ended May 31, 2018. For additional information on our investments in equity securities, see “Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” and “Note 11—Equity—Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income.”

On June 12, 2019, Farmer Mac redeemed its Series B non-cumulative preferred stock at a redemption price of $25.00 per share, plus any declared and unpaid dividends through and including the redemption date. The amortized cost of our




NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





investment in the Farmer Mac Series B non-cumulative preferred stock was $25 million as of May 31, 2019, which equals the per share redemption price.

Debt Securities

Pursuant to our investment policy guidelines, all fixed-income debt securities, at the time of purchase, must be rated at least investment grade and on stable outlook based on external credit ratings from at least two of the leading global credit rating agencies, when available, or the corresponding equivalent, when not available. Securities rated investment grade, that is those rated Baa3 or higher by Moody’s Investors Service (“Moody’s”) or BBB- or higher by S&P or BBB- or higher by Fitch Ratings Inc. (“Fitch”), are generally considered by the rating agencies to be of lower credit risk than non-investment grade securities.

Amortized Cost and Fair Value of Debt Securities

The following tables present the amortized cost and fair value of our debt securities and the corresponding gross unrealized gains and losses, by classification category and major security type, as of May 31, 2019 and 2018.

  May 31, 2019
(Dollars in thousands) Amortized Cost Gross Unrealized Gains Gross Unrealized Losses Fair Value
Debt securities held to maturity:        
Certificates of deposit $1,000
 $
 $
 $1,000
Commercial paper 12,395
 
 
 12,395
U.S. agency debt securities 3,207
 108
 
 3,315
Corporate debt securities 478,578
 4,989
 (912) 482,655
Commercial MBS:        
Agency 7,255
 291
 
 7,546
Non-agency 3,453
 
 (7) 3,446
Total commercial MBS 10,708
 291
 (7) 10,992
U.S. state and municipality debt securities 9,608
 352
 
 9,960
Foreign government debt securities 1,254
 42
 
 1,296
Other ABS(1)
 48,694
 290
 (48) 48,936
Total debt securities, held to maturity $565,444
 $6,072
 $(967) $570,549





NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





  May 31, 2018
(Dollars in thousands) Amortized Cost Gross Unrealized Gains Gross Unrealized Losses Fair Value
Debt securities held to maturity:        
Certificates of deposit $5,148
 $
 $
 $5,148
Commercial paper 9,134
 
 
 9,134
U.S. agency debt securities 2,000
 16
 
 2,016
Corporate debt securities 455,721
 714
 (4,595) 451,840
Commercial MBS:       
Agency 7,024
 63
 
 7,087
Non-agency 3,453
 3
 (3) 3,453
Total commercial MBS 10,477
 66
 (3) 10,540
U.S. state and municipality debt securities 2,147
 24
 
 2,171
Foreign government debt securities 1,241
 9
 
 1,250
Other ABS(1)
 34,651
 11
 (215) 34,447
Total debt securities, held to maturity $520,519
 $840
 $(4,813) $516,546
____________________________
(1)Consists primarily of securities backed by auto lease loans, equipment-backed loans, auto loans and credit card loans.

Debt Securities in Gross Unrealized Loss Position

An unrealized loss exists when the fair value of an individual security is less than its amortized cost basis. The following table presents the fair value and gross unrealized losses for debt securities in a gross loss position, aggregated by security type, and the length of time the securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position as of May 31, 2019 and 2018. The securities are segregated between investments that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position for less than 12 months and 12 months or more based on the point in time that the fair value declined below the amortized cost basis.
  May 31, 2019
  Unrealized Loss Position Less than 12 Months Unrealized Loss Position 12 Months or Longer Total
(Dollars in thousands) Fair Value Gross Unrealized Losses Fair Value Gross Unrealized Losses Fair Value Gross Unrealized Losses
Debt securities held to maturity:            
Commercial paper(1)
 $2,688
 $
 $
 $
 $2,688
 $
Corporate debt securities 45,999
 (198) 164,086
 (714) 210,085
 (912)
Commercial MBS, non-agency 1,996
 (4) 1,448
 (3) 3,444
 (7)
Other ABS(2)
 1,982
 (4) 13,840
 (44) 15,822
 (48)
Total debt securities held to maturity $52,665
 $(206) $179,374
 $(761) $232,039
 $(967)





NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





  May 31, 2018
  Unrealized Loss Position Less than 12 Months Unrealized Loss Position 12 Months or Longer Total
(Dollars in thousands) Fair Value Gross Unrealized Losses Fair Value Gross Unrealized Losses Fair Value Gross Unrealized Losses
Debt securities held to maturity:            
Corporate debt securities $280,139
 $(4,595) $
 $
 $280,139
 $(4,595)
Commercial MBS, non-agency 1,451
 (3) 
 
 1,451
 (3)
Other ABS(2)
 27,012
 (215) 
 
 27,012
 (215)
Total debt securities held to maturity $308,602
 $(4,813) $
 $
 $308,602
 $(4,813)
____________________________
(1)Unrealized losses on the commercial paper investments are less than $1,000.
(2)Consists primarily of securities backed by auto lease loans, equipment-backed loans, auto loans and credit card loans.

Other-Than-Temporary Impairment

We conduct periodic reviews of all securities with unrealized losses to evaluate whether the impairment is other than temporary. The number of individual securities in an unrealized loss position was 187 as of May 31, 2019. We have assessed each security with gross unrealized losses included in the above table for credit impairment. As part of that assessment, we concluded that the unrealized losses are driven by changes in market interest rates rather than by adverse changes in the credit quality of these securities. Based on our assessment, we expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis of these securities, as we do not intend to sell any of the securities and have concluded that it is more likely than not that we will not be required to sell prior to recovery of the amortized cost basis. Accordingly, we currently consider the impairment of these securities to be temporary.

Contractual Maturity and Yield

The following table presents, by major security type, the remaining contractual maturity based on amortized cost and fair value of our HTM investment securities as of May 31, 2019 and 2018. Because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay certain obligations, the expected maturities of our investments may differ from the scheduled contractual maturities presented below. 




NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





  May 31, 2019
(Dollars in thousands) Due in 1 Year or Less Due >1 Year through 5 Years Due >5 Years through 10 Years Due >10 Years Total
Amortized cost:          
Certificates of deposit $
 $1,000
 $
 $
 $1,000
Commercial paper 12,395
 
 
 
 12,395
U.S. agency debt securities 
 2,678
 529
 
 3,207
Corporate debt securities 51,923
 414,788
 11,867
 
 478,578
Commercial MBS:          
Agency 
 310
 6,945
 
 7,255
Non-agency 
 
 
 3,453
 3,453
Total commercial MBS 
 310
 6,945
 3,453
 10,708
U.S. state and municipality debt securities 
 9,608
 
 
 9,608
Foreign government debt securities 
 1,254
 
 
 1,254
Other ABS(1)
 510
 45,730
 2,454
 
 48,694
Total $64,828
 $475,368
 $21,795
 $3,453
 $565,444
           
Fair value:          
Certificates of deposit $
 $1,000
 $
 $
 $1,000
Commercial paper 12,395
 
 
 
 12,395
U.S. agency debt securities 
 2,769
 546
 
 3,315
Corporate debt securities 51,818
 418,606
 12,231
 
 482,655
Commercial MBS:          
Agency 
 317
 7,229
 
 7,546
Non-agency 
 
 
 3,446
 3,446
Total Commercial MBS 
 317
 7,229
 3,446
 10,992
U.S. State and Municipality Debt Securities 
 9,960
 
 
 9,960
Foreign Government Debt Securities 
 1,296
 
 
 1,296
Other ABS(1)
 509
 45,916
 2,511
 
 48,936
Total $64,722
 $479,864
 $22,517
 $3,446
 $570,549
           
Weighted-average coupon(2)
 2.08% 3.10% 3.07% 3.26% 2.98%





NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





  May 31, 2018
(Dollars in thousands) Due in 1 Year or Less Due > 1 Year through 5 Years Due > 5 Years through 10 Years Due >10 Years Total
Amortized cost:          
Certificates of deposit $5,148
 $
 $
 $
 $5,148
Commercial paper 9,134
 
 
 
 9,134
U.S. agency debt securities 
 2,000
 
 
 2,000
Corporate debt securities 9,111
 377,384
 69,226
 
 455,721
Commercial MBS:          
Agency 
 
 7,024
 
 7,024
Non-Agency 
 
 
 3,453
 3,453
Total Commercial MBS 
 
 7,024
 3,453
 10,477
U.S. State and Municipality Debt Securities 
 
 2,147
 
 2,147
Foreign Government Debt Securities 
 1,241
 
 
 1,241
Other ABS(1)
 
 33,357
 1,294
 
 34,651
Total $23,393
 $413,982
 $79,691
 $3,453
 $520,519
           
Fair value:          
Certificates of deposit $5,148
 $
 $
 $
 $5,148
Commercial paper 9,134
 
 
 
 9,134
U.S. agency debt securities 
 2,016
 
 
 2,016
Corporate debt securities 9,056
 373,284
 69,500
 
 451,840
Commercial MBS:          
Agency 
 
 7,087
 
 7,087
Non-Agency 
 
 
 3,453
 3,453
Total Commercial MBS 
 
 7,087
 3,453
 10,540
U.S. State and Municipality Debt Securities 
 
 2,171
 
 2,171
Foreign Government Debt Securities 
 1,250
 
 
 1,250
Other ABS(1)
 
 33,157
 1,290
 
 34,447
Total $23,338
 $409,707
 $80,048
 $3,453
 $516,546
           
Weighted average coupon(2)
 1.81% 2.84% 3.60% 2.74% 2.91%
____________________________
(1)Consists primarily of securities backed by auto lease loans, equipment-backed loans, auto loans and credit card loans.
(2)Calculated based on the weighted-average coupon rate, which excludes the impact of amortization of premium and accretion of discount.

The average contractual maturity and weighted-average coupon of our HTM investment securities was three years and 2.98%, respectively, as of May 31, 2019. The average credit rating of these securities, based on the equivalent lowest credit rating by Moody’s, S&P and Fitch was A2, A and A, respectively, as of May 31, 2019.

Realized Gains and Losses

We did not sell any of our investment securities during either of the years ended May 31, 2019 and May 31, 2018, and therefore have not recorded any realized gains or losses.




NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





NOTE 4—LOANS
        
We segregate our loan portfolio into segments, by legal entity, based on the borrower member class, which consists of CFC distribution, CFC power supply, CFC statewide and associate, NCSC and RTFC. We offer both long-term and line of credit loans to our borrowers. Under our long-term loan facilities, a borrower may select a fixed interest rate or a variable interest rate at the time of each loan advance. Line of credit loans are revolving loan facilities and generally have a variable interest rate.

We offer loans under secured long-term facilities with terms up to 35 years and line of credit loans. Under secured long-term facilities, borrowers have the option of selecting a fixed-fixed or variable-ratevariable rate for a period of one to 35 years for each long-term loan advance. When a selected fixed interest rate term expires, the borrower may select another fixed-rate term or a variable rate. Line of credit loans are revolving loan facilities that typically variable-rate revolving facilitieshave a variable interest rate and are generally unsecured.


112

NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Collateral and security requirements for advances on loan commitments are identical to those required at the time of the initial loan approval.


Loans to Members

Loans to members consist of loans held for investment and loans held for sale. The outstanding amount of loans held for investment is recorded based on the unpaid principal balance, net of charge-offs and recoveries, of loans and deferred loan origination costs. The outstanding amount of loans held for sale is recorded based on the lower of cost or fair value. The following table presents the outstanding principal balance of loans to members including deferredby legal entity, member class and loan origination costs, and unadvanced loan commitments by loan type, and member class, as of May 31, 20192022 and 2018.2021.

  May 31,
  2019 2018
(Dollars in thousands) 
Loans
Outstanding
 
Unadvanced
Commitments (1)
 
Loans
Outstanding
 
Unadvanced
Commitments (1)
Loan type:        
Long-term loans:        
Fixed rate $23,094,253
 $
 $22,696,185
 $
Variable rate 1,066,880
 5,448,636
 1,039,491
 4,952,834
Total long-term loans 24,161,133
 5,448,636
 23,735,676
 4,952,834
Lines of credit 1,744,531
 7,788,922
 1,431,818
 7,692,784
Total loans outstanding 25,905,664
 13,237,558
 25,167,494
 12,645,618
Deferred loan origination costs 11,240
 
 11,114
 
Loans to members $25,916,904
 $13,237,558
 $25,178,608
 $12,645,618
      ��  
Member class:        
CFC:        
Distribution $20,155,266
 $8,773,018
 $19,551,511
 $8,188,376
Power supply 4,578,841
 3,466,680
 4,397,353
 3,407,095
Statewide and associate 83,569
 165,687
 69,055
 128,025
Total CFC 24,817,676
 12,405,385
 24,017,919
 11,723,496
NCSC 742,888
 552,840
 786,457
 624,663
RTFC 345,100
 279,333
 363,118
 297,459
Total loans outstanding 25,905,664
 13,237,558
 25,167,494
 12,645,618
Deferred loan origination costs 11,240
 
 11,114
 
Loans to members $25,916,904
 $13,237,558
 $25,178,608
 $12,645,618
Table 4.1: Loans to Members by Member Class and Loan Type
____________________________
May 31,
 20222021
(Dollars in thousands)Amount% of TotalAmount% of Total
Member class:    
CFC:    
Distribution$23,844,242 79 %$22,027,423 78 %
Power supply4,901,770 17 5,154,312 18 
Statewide and associate126,863  106,121 — 
Total CFC28,872,875 96 27,287,856 96 
NCSC710,878 2 706,868 
RTFC467,601 2 420,383 
Total loans outstanding(1)
30,051,354 100 28,415,107 100 
Deferred loan origination costs—CFC(2)
12,032  11,854 — 
Loans to members$30,063,386 100 %$28,426,961 100 %
Loan type:    
Long-term loans:
Fixed rate$26,952,372 90 %$25,514,766 90 %
Variable rate820,201 2 658,579 
Total long-term loans27,772,573 92 26,173,345 92 
Lines of credit2,278,781 8 2,241,762 
Total loans outstanding(1)
30,051,354 100 28,415,107 100 
Deferred loan origination costs—CFC(2)
12,032  11,854 — 
Loans to members$30,063,386 100 %$28,426,961 100 %
____________________________
(1)The interest rate on unadvanced loan commitments is not set until an advance is made; therefore, all long-term unadvanced loan commitments are reported as variable-rate. However, Represents the borrower may select either a fixed or a variable rate when an advance on a commitment is made.

Unadvanced Loan Commitments

Unadvanced loan commitments represent approvedunpaid principal balance, net of charge-offs and executed loan contracts for which funds have not been advanced to borrowers. The following table summarizes the available balance under unadvanced loan commitmentsrecoveries, of loans as of May 31, 2019 and the related maturities, by fiscal year and thereafter, byend of each period.
(2)Deferred loan type:

origination costs are recorded on the books of CFC.





113


NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS






  Available
Balance
 Notional Maturities of Unadvanced Loan Commitments
(Dollars in thousands)  2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Thereafter
Line of credit loans $7,788,922
 $3,998,036
 $908,628
 $488,017
 $1,391,887
 $872,813
 $129,541
Long-term loans 5,448,636
 389,799
 736,621
 1,404,204
 1,210,164
 1,694,441
 13,407
Total $13,237,558
 $4,387,835
 $1,645,249
 $1,892,221
 $2,602,051
 $2,567,254
 $142,948

Unadvanced line of credit commitments accounted for 59% of total unadvanced loan commitments as of May 31, 2019, while unadvanced long-term loan commitments accounted for 41% of total unadvanced loan commitments. Unadvanced line of credit commitments are typically revolving facilities for periods not to exceed five years. Unadvanced line of credit commitments generally serve as supplemental back-up liquidity to our borrowers. Historically, borrowers have not drawn the full commitment amount for line of credit facilities, and we have experienced a very low utilization rate on line of credit loan facilities regardless of whether or not we are obligated to fund the facility where a material adverse change exists.

Our unadvanced long-term loan commitments have a five-year draw period under which a borrower may advance funds prior to the expiration of the commitment. We expect that the majority of the long-term unadvanced loan commitments of $5,449 million will be advanced prior to the expiration of the commitment.

Because we historically have experienced a very low utilization rate on line of credit loan facilities, which account for the majority of our total unadvanced loan commitments, we believe the unadvanced loan commitment total of $13,238 million as of May 31, 2019 is not necessarily representative of our future funding cash requirements.

Unadvanced Loan Commitments—Conditional

The substantial majority of our line of credit commitments and all of our unadvanced long-term loan commitments include material adverse change clauses. Unadvanced loan commitments subject to material adverse change clauses totaled $10,294 million and $9,789 million as of May 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Prior to making an advance on these facilities, we confirm that there has been no material adverse change in the business or condition, financial or otherwise, of the borrower since the time the loan was approved and confirm that the borrower is currently in compliance with loan terms and conditions. In some cases, the borrower’s access to the full amount of the facility is further constrained by the designated purpose, imposition of borrower-specific restrictions or by additional conditions that must be met prior to advancing funds.

Unadvanced Loan Commitments—Unconditional

Unadvanced loan commitments not subject to material adverse change clauses at the time of each advance consisted of unadvanced committed lines of credit totaling $2,944 million and $2,857 million as of May 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. As such, we are required to advance amounts on these committed facilities as long as the borrower is in compliance with the terms and conditions of the facility.

The following table summarizes the available balance under unconditional committed lines of credit and the related maturities by fiscal year and thereafter, as of May 31, 2019.
  
Available
Balance
 Notional Maturities of Unconditional Committed Lines of Credit
(Dollars in thousands)  2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
Committed lines of credit $2,943,616
$340,361
$451,865
$191,634
$1,239,917
$719,839

Loan Sales

We may transfer from time to time,whole loans and participating interests to third parties under our directparties. These transfers are typically made concurrently or within a short period of time with the closing of the loan sale program. Our transfer of loans, which isor participation agreement at par value and sold concurrently with loan closing, meetsmeet the applicable accounting criteria required for sale accounting. Accordingly,




NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





Therefore, we remove the transferred loans or participating interests from our consolidated balance sheets when control has been surrendered and recognize a gain or loss.loss on the sale, if any. We retain thea servicing performance obligationsobligation on thesethe transferred loans and recognize related servicing fees on an accrual basis over the period for which servicing activity is provided, as we believe the servicing fee represents adequate compensation. We doOther than the servicing performance obligation, we have not holdretained any continuing interest in the loans sold to date other than servicing performance obligations. Wedate. In addition, we have no obligation to repurchase loans from the purchaser,that are sold, except in the case of breaches of representations and warranties.


We sold CFC loans with outstanding balances totaling $35 million, $119 million and $58 millionNCSC loans, at par for cash, totaling $171 million, $126 million and $151 million in fiscal year 2019, 2018years 2022, 2021 and 2017,2020, respectively. We recorded immaterial losses uponon the sale of these loans attributable to the unamortized deferred loan origination costs associated with the transferred loans.

Pledging of Loans

We are required to pledge eligible mortgage notes in an amount at least equal to the outstanding balance of our secured debt. The following table summarizes ourhad loans outstanding as collateral pledged to secure our collateral trust bonds, Clean Renewable Energy Bonds, notes payable to Farmer Mac and notes payable under the Guaranteed Underwriter Program of the USDA (“Guaranteed Underwriter Program”) and the amount of the corresponding debt outstandingheld for sale totaling $44 million as of May 31, 2019 and 2018. See “Note 6—Short-Term Borrowings” and “Note 7—Long-Term Debt”2022, which were sold at par for information on our borrowings.cash subsequent to year-end.

  May 31,
(Dollars in thousands) 2019 2018
Collateral trust bonds:    
2007 indenture:    
Distribution system mortgage notes $8,775,231
 $8,643,344
RUS-guaranteed loans qualifying as permitted investments 134,678
 140,680
Total pledged collateral $8,909,909
 $8,784,024
Collateral trust bonds outstanding 7,622,711
 7,697,711
     
1994 indenture:    
Distribution system mortgage notes $47,331
 $243,418
Collateral trust bonds outstanding 40,000
 220,000
     
Farmer Mac:    
Distribution and power supply system mortgage notes $3,751,798
 $3,331,775
Notes payable outstanding 3,054,914
 2,891,496
     
Clean Renewable Energy Bonds Series 2009A:    
Distribution and power supply system mortgage notes $10,349
 $12,615
Cash 415
 415
Total pledged collateral $10,764
 $13,030
Notes payable outstanding 9,225
 11,556
     
Federal Financing Bank:    
Distribution and power supply system mortgage notes $6,157,218
 $5,772,750
Notes payable outstanding 5,410,507
 4,856,375





NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS






Credit Concentration


Concentrations of credit may exist when a lender has large credit exposures to single borrowers, large credit exposures to borrowers in the same industry sector or engaged in similar activities or large credit exposures to borrowers in a geographic region that would cause the borrowers to be similarly impacted by economic or other conditions in the region. As a tax-exempt, member-owned finance cooperative, CFC’s principal focus is to provide funding to its rural electric utility cooperative members to assist them in acquiring, constructing and operating electric distribution systems, power supply systems and related facilities. We serve electric and telecommunications members throughout the United States and its territories, including 50 states, the District of Columbia, American Samoa and Guam. Our consolidated membership totaled 1,447 members and 222 associates as of May 31, 2019. Texas has the largest number of member cooperatives and the largest concentration of outstanding loans to borrowers in any one state, with approximately 15% of total loans outstanding as of both May 31, 2019 and 2018.

Because we lend primarily to our rural electric utility cooperative members, we have had a loan portfolio subject to single-industry and single-obligor concentration risks.

risks since our inception in 1969. Loans outstanding to electric utility organizations represented approximatelyof $29,584 million and $27,995 million as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, accounted for 98% and 99% of total loans outstanding as of May 31, 2019, unchanged from May 31, 2018.each respective date The remaining loans outstanding in our portfolio were to RTFC members, affiliates and associates in the telecommunications industry.

Single-Obligor Concentration

The outstanding loan exposureexposure for our 20 largest borrowers was 22%totaled $6,220 million and 23%$6,182 million as of May 31, 20192022 and 2018, respectively. The2021, respectively, representing 21% and 22% of total loans outstanding as of each respective date. Our 20 largest borrowers consisted of 12 distribution systems and 8 power supply systems as of May 31, 2022. In comparison, our 20 largest borrowers consisted of 10 distribution systems nineand 10 power supply systems and one NCSC associate as of both May 31, 2019 and 2018.2021. The largest total outstanding exposure to a single borrower or controlled group represented approximatelyless than 2% of total loans outstanding as of both May 31, 20192022 and 2018.2021.


As part of our strategy in managing our credit exposure to large borrowers, we entered into a long-term standby purchase commitment agreement with Farmer Mac during fiscal year 2016. Under this agreement, we may designate certain long-term loans to be covered under the commitment, subject to approval by Farmer Mac, and in the event any such loan later goes into payment default for at least 90 days, upon request by us, Farmer Mac must purchase such loan at par value. The aggregate unpaid principal balance of designated and Farmer Mac approved loans was $619 million and $660 million as of May 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Under the agreement, weWe are required to pay Farmer Mac a monthly fee based on the unpaid principal balance of loans covered under the purchase commitment. NoThe aggregate unpaid principal balance of designated and Farmer Mac-approved loans was $493 million and $512 million as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Loan exposure to our 20 largest borrowers covered under the Farmer Mac agreement totaled $316 million and $309 million as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, which reduced our exposure to the 20 largest borrowers to 20% and 21% as of each respective date. We have had no loan defaults for loans hadcovered under this agreement; therefore, no loans have been put to FarmerFarmer Mac for purchase pursuant to thisthe standby


114

NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

purchase agreement as of May 31, 2019. Also, we had2022. Our credit exposure is also mitigated by long-term loans totaling $154guaranteed by the RUS. Guaranteed RUS loans totaled $131 million and $161$139 million as of May 31, 20192022 and 2018,2021, respectively.

Geographic Concentration

Although our organizational structure and mission results in single-industry concentration, we serve a geographically diverse group of electric and telecommunications borrowers throughout the U.S. The consolidated number of borrowers with loans outstanding totaled 883 and 892 as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, guaranteedlocated in 49 states and the District of Columbia. Texas, which had 68 and 67 borrowers with loans outstanding as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, accounted for the largest number of borrowers with loans outstanding in any one state as of each respective date. Texas also accounted for the largest concentration of loan exposure in any one state as of each respective date. Loans outstanding to Texas-based electric utility organizations totaled $5,104 million and $4,878 million as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, and accounted for approximately 17% of total loans outstanding as of each respective date. Of the loans outstanding to Texas-based electric utility organizations, $163 million and $172 million as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, were covered by RUS.the Farmer Mac standby repurchase agreement, which reduced our credit risk exposure to Texas-based borrowers to 16% of total loans outstanding as of each respective date.


Credit Quality Indicators


Assessing the overall credit quality of our loan portfolio and measuring our credit risk is an ongoing process that involves tracking payment status, charge-offs, troubled debt restructurings,TDRs, nonperforming and impaired loans, charge-offs, the internal risk ratings of our borrowers and other indicators of credit risk. We monitor and subject each borrower and loan facility in our loan portfolio to an individual risk assessment based on quantitative and qualitative factors. InternalPayment status trends and internal risk ratings and payment status trends are indicators, among others, of the probability of borrower default and leveloverall credit quality of credit risk in our loan portfolio.


Borrower Risk Ratings

As part of our credit risk management process, we monitor and evaluate each borrower and loan in our loan portfolio and assign internal borrower and loan facility risk ratings based on quantitative and qualitative assessments. Our borrower risk ratings are intended to assess probability of default. Each risk rating is reassessed annually following the receipt of the borrower’s audited financial statements; however, interim risk-rating downgrades or upgrades may occur as a result of significant developments or trends. Our borrower risk ratings are intended to align with banking regulatory agency credit risk rating definitions of pass and criticized classifications, with criticized divided between special mention, substandard and doubtful. Pass ratings reflect relatively low probability of default, while criticized ratings have a higher probability of default. Following is a description of each rating category.





NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





Pass:  Borrowers that are not experiencing difficulty and/or not showing a potential or well-defined credit weakness.
Special Mention:  Borrowers that may be characterized by a potential credit weakness or deteriorating financial condition that is not sufficiently serious to warrant a classification of substandard or doubtful.
Substandard:  Borrowers that display a well-defined credit weakness that may jeopardize the full collection of principal and interest.
Doubtful:  Borrowers that have a well-defined credit weakness or weaknesses that make full collection of principal and interest, on the basis of currently known facts, conditions and collateral values, highly questionable and improbable.

Loans to borrowers in the pass, special mention and substandard categories are generally considered not to be individually impaired and are included in the loan pools for determining the collective reserve component of the allowance for loan losses. Loans to borrowers in the doubtful category are considered to be impaired and are therefore individually assessed for impairment in determining the specific reserve component of the allowance for loan losses.

The following tables present total loans outstanding, by member class and borrower risk-rating category, based on the risk ratings used in the estimation of our allowance for loan losses as of May 31, 2019 and 2018. For purposes of these tables and for determining the allowance for loan losses, loans to borrowers that are supported by a full guarantee of repayment by the parent company are grouped in the same risk rating category of the guarantor parent company, rather than the risk rating category of the subsidiary borrower.

  May 31, 2019
(Dollars in thousands) Pass Special Mention Substandard Doubtful Total
CFC:          
Distribution $20,022,193
 $10,375
 $122,698
 $
 $20,155,266
Power supply 4,530,708
 
 48,133
 
 4,578,841
Statewide and associate 68,569
 15,000
 
 
 83,569
CFC total 24,621,470
 25,375
 170,831
 
 24,817,676
NCSC 742,888
 
 
 
 742,888
RTFC 339,508
 
 5,592
 
 345,100
Total loans outstanding $25,703,866
 $25,375
 $176,423
 $
 $25,905,664

  May 31, 2018
(Dollars in thousands) Pass Special Mention Substandard Doubtful Total
CFC:          
Distribution $19,429,121
 $6,853
 $115,537
 $
 $19,551,511
Power supply 4,348,328
 
 49,025
 
 4,397,353
Statewide and associate 69,055
 
 
 
 69,055
CFC total 23,846,504
 6,853
 164,562
 
 24,017,919
NCSC 786,457
 
 
 
 786,457
RTFC 356,503
 523
 6,092
 
 363,118
Total loans outstanding $24,989,464
 $7,376
 $170,654
 $
 $25,167,494

The substantial majority of the loans in the substandard category are attributable to loans to one electric distribution cooperative borrower and its subsidiary totaling $171 million and $165 million as of May 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.




NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





The electric distribution cooperative owns and operates a distribution and transmission system. Several years ago, it established a subsidiary to deploy retail broadband service in underserved rural communities. Although the borrower has experienced financial difficulties due to recent net losses and liquidity constraints, the borrower and its subsidiary are current with regard to all principal and interest payments and have never been delinquent. The borrower, which operates in a territory that is not rate-regulated, increased its electric rates during fiscal year 2019. All of the loans outstanding to this borrower were secured under our typical collateral requirements for long-term loan advances as of May 31, 2019. Based on the recent rate increase, as well as other actions taken by management, we anticipate an improvement in the borrower’s financial performance and liquidity and currently expect to collect all principal and interest amounts due from the borrower and its subsidiary. Accordingly, the loans outstanding to this borrower and its subsidiary were not deemed to be impaired as of May 31, 2019.

Payment Status of Loans


The following tables present the payment status of loans outstanding by member class as of May 31, 2019 and 2018. As indicated in the table, we did not have anyLoans are considered delinquent when contractual principal or interest amounts become past due loans as30 days or more following the scheduled payment due date. Loans are placed on nonaccrual status when payment of either May 31, 2019principal or May 31, 2018.

  May 31, 2019
(Dollars in thousands) Current 30-89 Days Past Due 
90 Days or More
Past Due (1)
 
Total
Past Due
 Total Loans Outstanding Nonaccrual Loans
CFC:            
Distribution $20,155,266
 $
 $
 $
 $20,155,266
 $
Power supply 4,578,841
 
 
 
 4,578,841
 
Statewide and associate 83,569
 
 
 
 83,569
 
CFC total 24,817,676
 
 
 
 24,817,676
 
NCSC 742,888
 
 
 
 742,888
 
RTFC 345,100
 
 
 
 345,100
 
Total loans outstanding $25,905,664
 $
 $
 $
 $25,905,664
 $
             
Percentage of total loans 100.00% % % % 100.00% %
  May 31, 2018
(Dollars in thousands) Current 30-89 Days Past Due 
90 Days or More
Past Due (1)
 Total
Past Due
 Total Loans Outstanding Nonaccrual Loans
CFC:            
Distribution $19,551,511
 $
 $
 $
 $19,551,511
 $
Power supply 4,397,353
 
 
 
 4,397,353
 
Statewide and associate 69,055
 
 
 
 69,055
 
CFC total 24,017,919
 
 
 
 24,017,919
 
NCSC 786,457
 
 
 
 786,457
 
RTFC 363,118
 
 
 
 363,118
 
Total loans outstanding $25,167,494
 $
 $
 $
 $25,167,494
 $
             
Percentage of total loans 100.00% % % % 100.00% %
____________________________
(1) All loansinterest is 90 days or more past due are on nonaccrual status.or management determines that the full collection of principal and interest is doubtful. The following table presents the payment status, by legal entity and member class, of loans outstanding as of May 31, 2022 and 2021.


Table 4.2: Payment Status of Loans Outstanding
 May 31, 2022
(Dollars in thousands)Current30-89 Days Past Due> 90 Days
Past Due
Total
Past Due
Total Loans OutstandingNonaccrual Loans
Member class:
CFC:      
Distribution$23,844,242 $ $ $ $23,844,242 $ 
Power supply4,787,832 28,389 85,549 113,938 4,901,770 227,790 
Statewide and associate126,863    126,863  
CFC total28,758,937 28,389 85,549 113,938 28,872,875 227,790 
NCSC710,878    710,878  
RTFC467,601    467,601  
Total loans outstanding$29,937,416 $28,389 $85,549 $113,938 $30,051,354 $227,790 
Percentage of total loans99.62 %0.09 %0.29 %0.38 %100.00 %0.76 %






115


NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS






 May 31, 2021
(Dollars in thousands)Current30-89 Days Past Due> 90 Days
Past Due
Total
Past Due
Total Loans OutstandingNonaccrual Loans
Member class:
CFC:      
Distribution$22,027,423 $— $— $— $22,027,423 $— 
Power supply5,069,316 3,400 81,596 84,996 5,154,312 228,312 
Statewide and associate106,121 — — — 106,121 — 
CFC total27,202,860 3,400 81,596 84,996 27,287,856 228,312 
NCSC706,868 — — — 706,868 — 
RTFC420,383 — — — 420,383 9,185 
Total loans outstanding$28,330,111 $3,400 $81,596 $84,996 $28,415,107 $237,497 
Percentage of total loans99.70 %0.01 %0.29 %0.30 %100.00 %0.84 %

We had 2 borrowers, Brazos Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. (“Brazos”) and Brazos Sandy Creek Electric Cooperative Inc. (“Brazos Sandy Creek”) with delinquent loans totaling $114 million as of May 31, 2022. In comparison, we had 1 borrower, Brazos, with delinquent loans totaling $85 million as of May 31, 2021. Brazos, a CFC Texas-based power supply borrower, filed for bankruptcy in March 2021 due to its exposure to elevated wholesale electric power costs during the February 2021 polar vortex. Brazos is not permitted to make scheduled loan payments without approval of the bankruptcy court. As a result, we have not received payments from Brazos since March 2021, and its loans outstanding were on nonaccrual status as of each respective date.

On March 18, 2022, Brazos Sandy Creek, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Brazos and a CFC Texas-based electric power supply borrower, filed for bankruptcy following the filing of a motion by Brazos to reject its power purchase agreement with Brazos Sandy Creek as part of Brazos’ bankruptcy proceedings. A Chapter 7 Trustee has been appointed, and the Chapter 7 Trustee has been approved by the bankruptcy court to operate Brazos Sandy Creek as a going concern. CFC had a secured loan outstanding to Brazos Sandy Creek totaling $28 million as of May 31, 2022, which, upon notification of the bankruptcy filing by Brazos Sandy Creek, was classified as nonperforming. Brazos Sandy Creek’s loan outstanding of $28 million was delinquent as of May 31, 2022 and on nonaccrual status as of this date.

The decrease in loans on nonaccrual status of $9 million to $228 million as of May 31, 2022, from $237 million was due to the receipt of loan principal payments. See “Nonperforming Loans” below for additional information.

Troubled Debt Restructurings


We didhave not havehad any loans modifiedloan modifications that were required to be accounted for as TDRs during thea TDR since fiscal year ended May 31, 2019.2016. The following table provides a summarypresents the outstanding balance of modified loans modifiedaccounted for as TDRs in prior periods and the performance status, by legal entity and member class, of these loans and the unadvanced loan commitments related to the TDR loans, by member class, as of May 31, 20192022 and 2018.2021.




116

NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

  May 31,
  2019 2018
(Dollars in thousands) 
Loans
Outstanding
 % of Total Loans 
Unadvanced
Commitments
 
Loans
Outstanding
 % of Total Loans 
Unadvanced
Commitments
TDR loans:            
Performing TDR loans:            
CFC/Distribution $6,261
 0.03% $
 $6,507
 0.03% $
RTFC 5,592
 0.02
 
 6,092
 0.02
 
Total performing TDR loans 11,853
 0.05
 
 12,599
 0.05
 
Total TDR loans $11,853
 0.05% $
 $12,599
 0.05% $
Table 4.3: Trouble Debt Restructurings

May 31,
 20222021
(Dollars in thousands)Number of Borrowers
Outstanding Amount (1)
% of Total Loans OutstandingNumber of Borrowers
Outstanding Amount (1)
% of Total Loans Outstanding
TDR loans:  
Member class:
CFC—Distribution1$5,092 0.02 %1$5,379 0.02 %
RTFC14,092 0.01 14,592 0.02 
Total TDR loans2$9,184 0.03 %2$9,971 0.04 %
Performance status of TDR loans:
Performing TDR loans2$9,184 0.03 %2$9,971 0.04 %
Total TDR loans2$9,184 0.03 %2$9,971 0.04 %
____________________________
(1) Represents the unpaid principal balance net of charge-offs and recoveries as of the end of each period.

There were 0 unadvanced commitments related to these loans as of May 31, 2022 or May 31, 2021. These loans, which have been performing in accordance with the terms of their respective restructured loan agreement for an extended period of time, were classified as performing and on accrual status as of May 31, 2022 and 2021. We did not have any TDR loans classified as nonperforming as of May 31, 2019 or May 31, 2018. TDR loans classified as performing as of May 31, 20192022 and 2018 were performing in accordance with the terms of their respective restructured loan agreement and on accrual status as of the respective reported dates. One2021.

The CFC borrower with athe TDR loan also had two1 line of credit facilities as of both May 31, 2019. One2022 and May 31, 2021. The line of credit facility for $6 million as of both May 31, 20192022 and 2018,2021, is restricted for fuel purchases only. Outstanding loans under this facility totaled $3 million as of May 31, 2019 and less than $1 million as of May 31, 2018, and2022. There were classified as performing as of each respective date. The other line of creditno outstanding loans under this facility for $2 million as of May 31, 2019, was put in place during fiscal year 2019 to provide bridge funding for electric work plan expenditures in anticipation of receiving RUS funding. Outstanding loans under this facility totaled $1 million as of May 31, 2019, and were classified as performing.2021.


Nonperforming Loans


In addition to TDR loans that may be classified as nonperforming, we also may have nonperforming loans that have not been modified as a TDR. We did not have anyThe following table presents the outstanding balance of nonperforming loans, classified as nonperformingby legal entity and member class, as of either May 31, 2019 or May 31, 2018.2022 and 2021.


We had no foregone interest income for loans on nonaccrual status duringTable 4.4: Nonperforming Loans
May 31,
 20222021
(Dollars in thousands)Number of Borrowers
Outstanding Amount (1)
% of Total Loans OutstandingNumber of Borrowers
Outstanding Amount (1)
% of Total Loans Outstanding
Nonperforming loans:  
Member class:
CFC—Power supply(2)
3$227,790 0.76 %2$228,312 0.81 %
RTFC  29,185 0.03 
Total nonperforming loans3$227,790 0.76 %4$237,497 0.84 %
____________________________
(1) Represents the years ended May 31, 2019unpaid principal balance net of charge-offs and 2018. Werecoveries as of the end of each period.
(2) In addition, we had less than $1 million foregone interest income for loans on nonaccrual status during the year endedin letters of credit outstanding to Brazos as of May 31, 2017.2021.





117


NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS






Impaired Loans

The following table provides information onWe had loans to 3 borrowers totaling $228 million classified as individually impairednonperforming as of May 31, 20192022. In comparison we had loans to 4 borrowers totaling $237 million classified as nonperforming as of May 31, 2021. Nonperforming loans represented 0.76% and 2018.
  May 31,
  2019 2018
(Dollars in thousands) 
Recorded
Investment
 
Related
Allowance
 
Recorded
Investment
 
Related
Allowance
With no specific allowance recorded:        
CFC $6,261
 $
 $6,507
 $
         
With a specific allowance recorded:        
RTFC 5,592
 1,021
 6,092
 1,198
Total impaired loans $11,853
 $1,021
 $12,599
 $1,198

0.84% of total loans outstanding as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The following table presents,reduction in nonperforming loans of $9 million during fiscal year 2022 was due in part to our receipt of full payment of all amounts due on nonperforming loans to 2 RTFC borrowers totaling $9 million during the fiscal quarter ended November 30, 2021 (the “second quarter of fiscal year 2022.”) In addition, we have continued to receive payments on the remaining outstanding nonperforming loan to a CFC electric power supply borrower, including payments totaling $29 million during fiscal year 2022, which reduced the balance of this loan to $114 million as of May 31, 2022, from $143 million as of May 31, 2021. These reductions were partially offset by company, the average recorded investment for individually impaired loans andclassification during the interest income recognized on these loans for fiscal yearsquarter ended May 31, 2019, 20182022 (the “fourth quarter of fiscal year 2022”) of the $28 million loan outstanding to Brazos Sandy Creek as nonperforming following its bankruptcy filing on March 18, 2022, as discussed above.

Loans outstanding to Brazos accounted for $86 million and 2017.$85 million of our total nonperforming loans as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. As discussed above, Brazos, which filed for bankruptcy in March 2021 due to its exposure to elevated wholesale electric power costs during the February 2021 polar vortex, is not permitted to make scheduled loan payments without approval of the bankruptcy court. Aggregate loans outstanding to Brazos and Brazos Sandy Creek totaled $114 million as of May 31, 2022, of which $49 million were secured and $65 million were unsecured.
  Average Recorded Investment  Interest Income Recognized 
(Dollars in thousands) 2019 2018 2017 2019 2018 2017
CFC $6,322
 $6,524
 $6,613
 $553
 $571
 $562
RTFC 5,861
 6,361
 7,736
 293
 318
 343
Total impaired loans $12,183
 $12,885
 $14,349
 $846
 $889
 $905


Net Charge-Offs


Charge-offs represent the amount of a loan that has been removed from our consolidated balance sheet when the loan is deemed uncollectible. Generally the amount of a charge-off is the recorded investment in excess of the fair value of the expected cash flows from the loan, or, if the loan is collateral dependent, the fair value of the underlying collateral securing the loan. We report charge-offs net of amounts recovered on previously charged offcharged-off loans. We had no0 loan defaults or charge-offs during the fiscal years ended May 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021 and 2017.2020. Prior to Brazos’ and Brazos Sandy Creek’s bankruptcy filings, we had not experienced any defaults or charge-offs in our electric utility and telecommunications loan portfolios since fiscal year 2013 and 2017, respectively.

Borrower Risk Ratings
NOTE 5—ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES


As part of our management of credit risk, we maintain a credit risk-rating framework under which we employ a consistent process for assessing the credit quality of our loan portfolio. We evaluate each borrower and loan facility in our loan portfolio and assign internal borrower and loan facility risk ratings based on consideration of a number of quantitative and qualitative factors. Each risk rating is reassessed annually following the receipt of the borrower’s audited financial statements; however, interim risk-rating adjustments may occur as a result of updated information affecting a borrower’s ability to fulfill its obligations or other significant developments and trends. We categorize loans in our portfolio based on our internally assigned borrower risk ratings, which are intended to assess the general creditworthiness of the borrower and probability of default. Our borrower risk ratings align with the U.S. federal banking regulatory agencies’ credit risk definitions of pass and criticized categories, with the criticized category further segmented among special mention, substandard and doubtful. Pass ratings reflect relatively low probability of default, while criticized ratings have a higher probability of default.

The following tables summarize changes,is a description of the borrower risk-rating categories.

Pass:  Borrowers that are not experiencing difficulty and/or not showing a potential or well-defined credit weakness.
Special Mention:  Borrowers that may be characterized by company, ina potential credit weakness or deteriorating financial condition that is not sufficiently serious to warrant a classification of substandard or doubtful.
Substandard:  Borrowers that display a well-defined credit weakness that may jeopardize the allowance for loan losses asfull collection of principal and for the years ended
May 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017.interest.


118

  Year Ended May 31, 2019
(Dollars in thousands) CFC NCSC RTFC Total
Balance as of May 31, 2018 $12,300
 $2,082
 $4,419
 $18,801
Provision (benefit) for loan losses 820
 (75) (2,011) (1,266)
Balance as of May 31, 2019 $13,120
 $2,007
 $2,408
 $17,535




NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS






  Year Ended May 31, 2018
(Dollars in thousands) CFC NCSC RTFC Total
Balance as of May 31, 2017 $29,499
 $2,910
 $4,967
 $37,376
Benefit for loan losses (17,199) (828) (548) (18,575)
Balance as of May 31, 2018 $12,300
 $2,082
 $4,419
 $18,801
Doubtful:  Borrowers that have a well-defined credit weakness or weaknesses that make full collection of principal and interest, on the basis of currently known facts, conditions and collateral values, highly questionable and improbable.

  Year Ended May 31, 2017
(Dollars in thousands) CFC NCSC RTFC Total
Balance as of May 31, 2016 $24,559
 $3,134
 $5,565
 $33,258
Provision (benefit) for loan losses 4,781
 (224) 1,421
 5,978
Charge-offs 
 
 (2,119) (2,119)
Recoveries 159
 
 100
 259
Balance as of May 31, 2017 $29,499
 $2,910
 $4,967
 $37,376

The following tables present, by company,Our internally assigned borrower risk ratings serve as the componentsprimary credit quality indicator for our loan portfolio. Because our internal borrower risk ratings provide important information on the probability of default, they are a key input in determining our allowance for loan lossescredit losses.

Table 4.5 displays total loans outstanding, by borrower risk-rating category and the recorded investment of the related loansby legal entity and member class, as of May 31, 20192022 and 2018.2021. The borrower risk-rating categories presented below correspond to the borrower risk rating categories used in calculating our collective allowance for credit losses. If a parent company provides a guarantee of full repayment of loans of a subsidiary borrower, we include the loans outstanding in the borrower risk-rating category of the guarantor parent company rather than the risk-rating category of the subsidiary borrower for purposes of calculating the collective allowance.


We present term loans outstanding as of May 31, 2022, by fiscal year of origination for each year during the five-year annual reporting period beginning in fiscal year 2018, and in the aggregate for periods prior to fiscal year 2018. The origination period represents the date CFC advances funds to a borrower, rather than the execution date of a loan facility for a borrower. Revolving loans are presented separately due to the nature of revolving loans. The substantial majority of loans in our portfolio represent fixed-rate advances under secured long-term facilities with terms up to 35 years and as indicated in Table 4.5 below, term loan advances made to borrowers prior to fiscal year 2018 totaled $16,540 million, representing 55% of our total loans outstanding of as of May 31, 2022. The average remaining maturity of our long-term loans, which accounted for 92% of total loans outstanding as of May 31, 2022, was 18 years.

As discussed above, as a member-owned finance cooperative, CFC’s principal focus is to provide funding to its rural electric utility cooperative members to assist them in acquiring, constructing and operating electric distribution systems, power supply systems and related facilities. As such, since our inception in 1969 we have had an extended repeat lending and repayment history with substantially all of our member borrowers through our various loan programs. Our secured long-term loan commitment facilities typically provide a five-year draw period under which a borrower may draw funds prior to the expiration of the commitment. Because our electric utility cooperative borrowers must make substantial annual capital investments to maintain operations and ensure delivery of the essential service provided by electric utilities, they require a continuous inflow of funds to finance infrastructure upgrades and new asset purchases. Due to the funding needs of electric utility cooperatives, a CFC borrower generally has multiple loans outstanding under advances drawn in different years.
While the number of borrowers with loans outstanding was 883 borrowers as of May 31, 2022, the number of loans outstanding was 16,584 as of May 31, 2022, resulting in an average of 19 loans outstanding per borrower. Our borrowers, however, are generally subject to cross-default under the terms of our loan agreements. Therefore, if a borrower defaults on one loan, the borrower is considered in default on all outstanding loans. Due to these factors, we historically have not observed a correlation between the year of origination of our loans and default risk. Instead, default risk on our loans has typically been more closely correlated to the risk rating of our borrowers.


119

  May 31, 2019
(Dollars in thousands) CFC NCSC RTFC Total
Ending balance of the allowance:        
Collective allowance $13,120
 $2,007
 $1,387
 $16,514
Specific allowance 
 
 1,021
 1,021
Total ending balance of the allowance $13,120
 $2,007
 $2,408
 $17,535
         
Recorded investment in loans:        
Collectively evaluated loans $24,811,415
 $742,888
 $339,508
 $25,893,811
Individually evaluated loans 6,261
 
 5,592
 11,853
Total recorded investment in loans $24,817,676
 $742,888
 $345,100
 $25,905,664
         
Total recorded investment in loans, net (1)
 $24,804,556
 $740,881
 $342,692
 $25,888,129
         
Allowance coverage ratio:        
Allowance as a percentage of total recorded investment in loans 0.05% 0.27% 0.70% 0.07%





NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS






  May 31, 2018
(Dollars in thousands) CFC NCSC RTFC Total
Ending balance of the allowance:        
Collective allowance $12,300
 $2,082
 $3,221
 $17,603
Specific allowance 
 
 1,198
 1,198
Total ending balance of the allowance $12,300
 $2,082
 $4,419
 $18,801
         
Recorded investment in loans:        
Collectively evaluated loans $24,011,412
 $786,457
 $357,026
 $25,154,895
Individually evaluated loans 6,507
 
 6,092
 12,599
Total recorded investment in loans $24,017,919
 $786,457
 $363,118
 $25,167,494
         
Total recorded investment in loans, net(1)
 $24,005,619
 $784,375
 $358,699
 $25,148,693
         
Allowance coverage ratio:        
Allowance as a percentage of total recorded investment in loans 0.05% 0.26% 1.22% 0.07%
Table 4.5: Loans Outstanding by Borrower Risk Ratings and Origination Year
___________________________
May 31, 2022
Term Loans by Fiscal Year of Origination
(Dollars in thousands)20222021202020192018PriorRevolving LoansTotalMay 31, 2021
Pass
CFC:
Distribution$2,533,579 $1,696,580 $1,882,003 $1,192,639 $1,451,710 $13,300,784 $1,538,709 $23,596,004 $21,808,099 
Power supply374,185 559,384 188,864 404,425 244,840 2,637,162 265,120 4,673,980 4,517,408 
Statewide and associate33,896 2,250 18,601 3,282  19,998 34,583 112,610 90,261 
CFC total2,941,660 2,258,214 2,089,468 1,600,346 1,696,550 15,957,944 1,838,412 28,382,594 26,415,768 
NCSC49,141 39,747 232,224 4,067 43,079 233,992 108,628 710,878 706,868 
RTFC92,446 88,526 44,851 10,032 22,198 184,382 21,074 463,509 406,606 
Total pass$3,083,247 $2,386,487 $2,366,543 $1,614,445 $1,761,827 $16,376,318 $1,968,114 $29,556,981 $27,529,242 
Special mention
CFC:
Distribution$ $4,889 $ $5,102 $932 $12,197 $225,118 $248,238 $219,324 
Power supply        29,611 
Statewide and associate   5,000 3,821 5,432  14,253 15,860 
CFC total 4,889  10,102 4,753 17,629 225,118 262,491 264,795 
RTFC     4,092  4,092 4,592 
Total special mention$ $4,889 $ $10,102 $4,753 $21,721 $225,118 $266,583 $269,387 
Substandard
CFC:
Power supply$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $378,981 
Total substandard$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $378,981 
Doubtful
CFC:
Power supply$ $ $ $ $ $142,241 $85,549 $227,790 $228,312 
CFC total     142,241 85,549 227,790 228,312 
RTFC        9,185 
Total doubtful$ $ $ $ $ $142,241 $85,549 $227,790 $237,497 
Total criticized loans$ $4,889 $ $10,102 $4,753 $163,962 $310,667 $494,373 $885,865 
Total loans outstanding$3,083,247 $2,391,376 $2,366,543 $1,624,547 $1,766,580 $16,540,280 $2,278,781 $30,051,354 $28,415,107 



120

NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Criticized loans totaled $494 million and $886 million as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, and represented approximately 2% and 3% of total loans outstanding as of each respective date. Criticized loans include loans outstanding to Brazos and Brazos Sandy Creek totaling $114 million as of May 31, 2022, which were classified as doubtful as of the respective date. In comparison, criticized loans include loans outstanding to Brazos of $85 million as of May 31, 2021, which were classified as doubtful as of the respective date. Each of the borrowers with loans outstanding in the criticized category, with the exception of Brazos and Brazos Sandy Creek, was current with regard to all principal and interest amounts due as of May 31, 2022. In comparison, each of the borrowers with loans outstanding in the criticized category, with the exception of Brazos, was current with regard to all principal and interest amounts due as of May 31, 2021. Brazos is not permitted to make scheduled loan payments without approval of the bankruptcy court.

Special Mention

NaN CFC electric distribution borrower with loans outstanding of $248 million and $219 million as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, accounted for the substantial majority of loans in the special mention loan category amount of $267 million and $269 million as of each respective date. This borrower experienced an adverse financial impact from restoration costs incurred to repair damage caused by two successive hurricanes. We expect that the borrower will receive grant funds from the Federal Emergency Management Agency and the state where it is located for the full reimbursement of the hurricane damage-related restoration costs.

Substandard

We did not have any loans classified as substandard as of May 31, 2022. We had loans outstanding to Rayburn Country Electric Cooperative, Inc. (“Rayburn”) totaling $379 million that were classified as substandard as of May 31, 2021. In February 2022, Rayburn successfully completed a securitization transaction to cover extraordinary costs and expenses incurred during the February 2021 polar vortex pursuant to a financing program enacted into law by Texas in June 2021 for qualifying electric cooperatives exposed to elevated power costs during the February 2021 polar vortex. Subsequent to the completion of the securitization transaction, Rayburn fully paid its outstanding obligations to the Electric Reliability Council of Texas. As a result, we revised our borrower risk rating for Rayburn to a rating in the pass category from a previous rating in the substandard category. In addition, we received loan payments from Rayburn during the fiscal year ended May 31, 2022 that reduced our loans outstanding to Rayburn to $167 million as of May 31, 2022 from $379 million as of May 31, 2021.

Doubtful

Loans outstanding classified as doubtful totaled $228 million as of May 31, 2022, consisting of loans outstanding to Brazos and Brazos Sandy Creek totaling $114 million and loans outstanding to a CFC electric power supply borrower of $114 million. In comparison, loans outstanding classified as doubtful totaled $237 million as of May 31, 2021, consisting of loans outstanding to Brazos of $85 million, loans outstanding to a CFC electric power supply borrower of $143 million and loans outstanding to two RTFC telecommunications borrowers totaling $9 million. These loans were also classified as nonperforming, as discussed above under “Nonperforming Loans.” As discussed above, in June 2021, Texas enacted securitization legislation that offers a financing program for qualifying electric cooperatives exposed to elevated power costs during the February 2021 polar vortex. Brazos qualifies for the Texas-enacted financing program.

Unadvanced Loan Commitments

Unadvanced loan commitments represent approved and executed loan contracts for which funds have not been advanced to borrowers. The following table presents unadvanced loan commitments, by member class and by loan type, as of May 31, 2022 and 2021.



121

NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Table 4.6: Unadvanced Commitments by Member Class and Loan Type

May 31,
(Dollars in thousands)20222021
Member class:
CFC:
Distribution$9,230,197 $9,387,070 
Power supply3,835,535 3,970,698 
Statewide and associate183,845 161,340 
Total CFC13,249,577 13,519,108 
NCSC551,901 551,125 
RTFC309,724 286,806 
Total unadvanced commitments$14,111,202 $14,357,039 
Loan type:(1)
Long-term loans:
Fixed rate$ $— 
Variable rate5,357,205 5,771,813 
Total long-term loans5,357,205 5,771,813 
Lines of credit8,753,997 8,585,226 
Total unadvanced commitments$14,111,202 $14,357,039 
____________________________
(1)The interest rate on unadvanced loan commitments is not set until an advance is made; therefore, all unadvanced long-term loan commitments are reported as variable rate. However, the borrower may select either a fixed or a variable rate when an advance is drawn under a loan commitment.

The following table displays, by loan type, the available balance under unadvanced loan commitments as of May 31, 2022 and the related maturities in each fiscal year during the five-year period ended May 31, 2027, and thereafter.

Table 4.7: Unadvanced Loan Commitments
 Available
Balance
Notional Maturities of Unadvanced Loan Commitments
(Dollars in thousands)20232024202520262027Thereafter
Line of credit loans$8,753,997 $4,160,953 $1,139,303 $1,588,513 $363,001 $1,431,073 $71,154 
Long-term loans5,357,205 618,042 1,473,024 732,910 934,832 1,445,115 153,282 
Total$14,111,202 $4,778,995 $2,612,327 $2,321,423 $1,297,833 $2,876,188 $224,436 

Unadvanced line of credit commitments accounted for 62% of total unadvanced loan commitments as of May 31, 2022, while unadvanced long-term loan commitments accounted for 38% of total unadvanced loan commitments. Unadvanced line of credit commitments are typically revolving facilities for periods not to exceed five years. Unadvanced line of credit commitments generally serve as supplemental back-up liquidity to our borrowers. Historically, borrowers have not drawn the full commitment amount for line of credit facilities, and we have experienced a very low utilization rate on line of credit loan facilities regardless of whether or not we are obligated to fund the facility where a material adverse change exists.

Our unadvanced long-term loan commitments typically have a five-year draw period under which a borrower may draw funds prior to the expiration of the commitment. We expect that the majority of the long-term unadvanced loan commitments of $5,357 million will be advanced prior to the expiration of the commitment.



122

NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Because we historically have experienced a very low utilization rate on line of credit loan facilities, which account for the majority of our total unadvanced loan commitments, we believe the unadvanced loan commitment total of $14,111 million as of May 31, 2022 is not necessarily representative of our future funding requirements.

Unadvanced Loan Commitments—Conditional

The substantial majority of our line of credit commitments and all of our unadvanced long-term loan commitments include material adverse change clauses. Unadvanced loan commitments subject to material adverse change clauses totaled $10,908 million and $11,312 million as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Prior to making an advance on these facilities, we confirm that there has been no material adverse change in the business or condition, financial or otherwise, of the borrower since the time the loan was approved and confirm that the borrower is currently in compliance with loan terms and conditions. In some cases, the borrower’s access to the full amount of the facility is further constrained by the designated purpose, imposition of borrower-specific restrictions or by additional conditions that must be met prior to advancing funds.

Unadvanced Loan Commitments—Unconditional

Unadvanced loan commitments not subject to material adverse change clauses at the time of each advance consisted of unadvanced committed lines of credit totaling $3,203 million and $3,045 million as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. As such, we are required to advance amounts on these committed facilities as long as the borrower is in compliance with the terms and conditions of the facility. The following table summarizes the available balance under unconditional committed lines of credit and the related maturity amounts in each fiscal year during the five-year period ending May 31, 2027.

Table 4.8: Unconditional Committed Lines of Credit—Available Balance
 Available
Balance
Notional Maturities of Unconditional Committed Lines of Credit
(Dollars in thousands)20232024202520262027
Committed lines of credit$3,203,023 $272,083 $497,722 $1,141,980 $243,699 $1,047,539 

Pledged Collateral—Loans

We are required to pledge eligible mortgage notes or other collateral in an amount at least equal to the outstanding balance of our secured debt. Table 4.9displays the borrowing amount under each of our secured borrowing agreements and the corresponding loans outstanding pledged as collateral as of May 31, 2022 and 2021. See “Note 6—Short-Term Borrowings” and “Note 7—Long-Term Debt” for information on our secured borrowings and other borrowings.



















123

NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Table 4.9: Pledged Loans
May 31,
(Dollars in thousands)20222021
Collateral trust bonds:
2007 indenture:
Collateral trust bonds outstanding$7,072,711 $7,422,711 
Pledged collateral:
Distribution system mortgage notes pledged8,564,596 8,400,293 
RUS-guaranteed loans qualifying as permitted investments114,654 121,679 
Total pledged collateral8,679,250 8,521,972 
1994 indenture:
Collateral trust bonds outstanding$25,000 $30,000 
Pledged collateral:
Distribution system mortgage notes pledged29,616 34,924 
Guaranteed Underwriter Program:
Notes payable outstanding$6,105,473 $6,269,303 
Pledged collateral:
Distribution and power supply system mortgage notes pledged6,904,591 7,150,240 
Farmer Mac:
Notes payable outstanding$3,094,679 $2,977,909 
Pledged collateral:
Distribution and power supply system mortgage notes pledged3,445,358 3,440,307 
Clean Renewable Energy Bonds Series 2009A:
Notes payable outstanding$2,755 $4,412 
Pledged collateral:
Distribution and power supply system mortgage notes pledged3,138 5,316 
Cash392 394 
Total pledged collateral3,530 5,710 



124

NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 5—ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES

We are required to maintain an allowance based on a current estimate of credit losses that are expected to occur over the remaining term of the loans in our portfolio. Our allowance for credit losses consists of a collective allowance and an asset-specific allowance. Additional information on our current CECL allowance methodology is provided in “Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.”

Allowance for Credit Losses—Loan Portfolio

The following tables summarize, by legal entity and member class, changes in the allowance for credit losses for our loan portfolio and present the allowance components for the years ended May 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020. The changes in the allowance and the allowance components prior to our adoption of CECL on June 1, 2020 are based on the incurred loss model.

Table 5.1: Changes in Allowance for Credit Losses
 Year Ended May 31, 2022
(Dollars in thousands)CFC DistributionCFC Power SupplyCFC Statewide & AssociateCFC TotalNCSCRTFCTotal
Balance as of May 31, 2021$13,426 $64,646 $1,391 $79,463 $1,374 $4,695 $85,532 
Provision (benefit) for credit losses2,355 (16,853)(140)(14,638)75 (3,409)(17,972)
Balance as of May 31, 2022$15,781 $47,793 $1,251 $64,825 $1,449 $1,286 $67,560 
 Year Ended May 31, 2021
(Dollars in thousands)CFC DistributionCFC Power SupplyCFC Statewide & AssociateCFC TotalNCSCRTFCTotal
Balance as of May 31, 2020$8,002 $38,027 $1,409 $47,438 $806 $4,881 $53,125 
Cumulative-effect adjustment from adoption of CECL accounting standard3,586 2,034 25 5,645 (15)(1,730)3,900 
Balance as of June 1, 2020$11,588 $40,061 $1,434 $53,083 $791 $3,151 57,025 
Provision (benefit) for credit losses1,838 24,585 (43)26,380 583 1,544 28,507 
Balance as of May 31, 2021$13,426 $64,646 $1,391 $79,463 $1,374 $4,695 $85,532 
 Year Ended May 31, 2020
(Dollars in thousands)CFC DistributionCFC Power SupplyCFC Statewide & AssociateCFC TotalNCSCRTFCTotal
Balance as of May 31, 2019$7,483 $4,253 $1,384 $13,120 $2,007 $2,408 $17,535 
Provision (benefit) for credit losses519 33,774 25 34,318 (1,201)2,473 35,590 
Balance as of May 31, 2020$8,002 $38,027 $1,409 $47,438 $806 $4,881 $53,125 









125

NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The following tables present, by legal entity and member class, the components of our allowance for credit losses as of May 31, 2022 and 2021.

Table 5.2: Allowance for Credit Losses Components
 May 31, 2022
(Dollars in thousands)CFC DistributionCFC Power SupplyCFC Statewide & AssociateCFC TotalNCSCRTFCTotal
Allowance components:
Collective allowance$15,781$9,355$1,251$26,387$1,449$1,040$28,876
Asset-specific allowance(1)
38,43838,43824638,684
Total allowance for credit losses$15,781$47,793$1,251$64,825$1,449$1,286$67,560
Loans outstanding:(1)
Collectively evaluated loans$23,839,150$4,673,980$126,863$28,639,993$710,878$463,509$29,814,380
Individually evaluated loans(1)
5,092227,790232,8824,092236,974
Total loans outstanding$23,844,242$4,901,770$126,863$28,872,875$710,878$467,601$30,051,354
Allowance ratios:
Collective allowance coverage ratio(2)
0.07 %0.20 %0.99 %0.09 %0.20 %0.22 %0.10 %
Asset-specific allowance coverage ratio(3)
 16.87  16.51  6.01 16.32 
Total allowance coverage ratio(4)
0.07 0.98 0.99 0.22 0.20 0.28 0.22 

 May 31, 2021
(Dollars in thousands)CFC DistributionCFC Power SupplyCFC Statewide & AssociateCFC TotalNCSCRTFCTotal
Allowance components:
Collective allowance$13,426$25,104$1,391$39,921$1,374$1,147$42,442
Asset-specific allowance(5)
39,54239,5423,54843,090
Total allowance for credit losses$13,426$64,646$1,391$79,463$1,374$4,695$85,532
Loans outstanding:(1)
   
Collectively evaluated loans$22,022,044$4,926,000$106,121$27,054,165$706,868$406,606$28,167,639
Individually evaluated loans5,379228,312233,69113,777247,468
Total loans outstanding$22,027,423$5,154,312$106,121$27,287,856$706,868$420,383$28,415,107
Allowance coverage ratios:
Collective allowance coverage ratio(2)
0.06 %0.51 %1.31 %0.15 %0.19 %0.28 %0.15 %
Asset-specific allowance coverage ratio(3)
— 17.32 — 16.92 — 25.75 17.41 
Total allowance coverage ratio(4)
0.06 1.25 1.31 0.29 0.19 1.12 0.30 


126

NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

___________________________
(1)Represents the unpaid principal amount of loans as of the end of each period. Excludes unamortized deferred loan origination costs of $11$12 million as of both May 31, 20192022 and 2018.2021.

(2)Calculated based on the collective allowance component at period-end divided by collectively evaluated loans outstanding at period-end.
As noted above(3)Calculated based on the asset-specific allowance component at period-end divided by individually evaluated loans outstanding at period-end.
(4)Calculated based on the total allowance for credit losses at period-end divided by total loans outstanding at period-end.
(5)In addition, we had less than $1 million in “Note 4—Loans,” we did not have any loans classified as nonperformingletters of credit outstanding to Brazos, for which the reserve is included in the asset-specific allowance as of either May 31, 2019 or2021.

Our allowance for credit losses and allowance coverage ratio decreased to $68 million and 0.22%, respectively, as of May 31, 2018.2022, from $86 million and 0.30%, respectively, as of May 31, 2021. The $18 million decrease in the allowance for credit losses reflected a decrease in the collective and the asset-specific allowance of $14 million and $4 million, respectively. The collective allowance decrease of $14 million was attributable to an improvement in Rayburn’s credit risk profile following the successful completion by Rayburn of a securitization transaction in February 2022 to cover extraordinary costs and expenses incurred during the February 2021 polar vortex and a significant reduction in loans outstanding to Rayburn due to payments received from Rayburn during fiscal year 2022. The asset-specific allowance decrease of $4 million stemmed from the combined impact of the elimination of an asset-specific allowance attributable to nonperforming loans totaling $9 million that were paid in full during the second quarter of fiscal year 2022 and the decrease of an asset-specific allowance for a nonperforming CFC power supply borrower discussed above, attributable to loan payments received on this loan, partially offset by the addition of an asset-specific allowance for Brazos Sandy Creek as a result of its bankruptcy filing.


Individually Impaired Loans Under Incurred Loss Methodology
Prior to our adoption of CECL on June 1, 2020, we assessed loan impairment on a collective basis unless we considered a loan to be impaired. We assessed loan impairment on an individual basis when, based on current information, it was probable that we would not receive all principal and interest amounts due in accordance with the contractual terms of the original loan agreement. In connection with our adoption of CECL, we no longer provide information on impaired loans. The following table presents, by company, the components of our recorded investment and interest income recognized for the year ended May 31, 2020.

Table 5.3: Average Recorded Investment and Interest Income Recognized on Individually Impaired Loans—Incurred Loss Model
 Year Ended May 31, 2020
(Dollars in thousands)Average Recorded InvestmentInterest Income Recognized
CFC$11,834 $568 
RTFC5,361 268 
Total impaired loans$17,195 $836 

Reserve for Credit Losses—Unadvanced Loan Commitments

In addition to the allowance for credit losses for our loan losses,portfolio, we also maintain a reservean allowance for credit losses for unadvanced loan commitments, atwhich we refer to as our “reserve for credit losses” because this amount is reported as a level estimatedcomponent of other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets. Upon adoption of CECL on June 1, 2020, we began measuring the reserve for credit losses for unadvanced loan commitments based on expected credit losses over the contractual period of our exposure to credit risk arising from our obligation to extend credit, unless that obligation is unconditionally cancellable by managementus. The reserve for credit losses related to provideour off-balance sheet exposure for probable losses under theseunadvanced loan commitments as of each balance sheet date, which was less than $1 million as of both May 31, 20192022 and 2018.2021.



127

NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 6—SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS


Short-term borrowings consist of borrowings with an original contractual maturity of one year or less and do not include the current portion of long-term debt. Our short-term borrowings totaled $3,608$4,981 million and accounted for 14%17% of total debt outstanding as of May 31, 2019,2022, compared with $3,796$4,582 million, or 15%,17% of total debt outstanding, as of May 31, 2018.2021. The following table provides comparative information on our short-term borrowings and weighted-average interest rates as of May 31, 20192022 and 2018.2021.



Table 6.1: Short-Term Borrowings Sources and Weighted-Average Interest Rates

May 31,
 20222021
(Dollars in thousands)AmountWeighted- Average
Interest Rate
AmountWeighted-Average
Interest Rate
Short-term borrowings:    
Commercial paper:
Commercial paper dealers, net of discounts$1,024,813 0.96 %$894,977 0.16 %
Commercial paper members, at par1,358,069 0.92 1,124,607 0.14 
Total commercial paper2,382,882 0.94 2,019,584 0.15 
Select notes to members1,753,441 1.11 1,539,150 0.30 
Daily liquidity fund notes to members427,790 0.80 460,556 0.08 
Medium-term notes to members417,054 0.66 362,691 0.42 
Securities sold under repurchase agreements  200,115 0.30 
Total short-term borrowings$4,981,167 0.97 $4,582,096 0.22 


NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





  May 31,
  2019 2018
(Dollars in thousands) Amount 
Weighted- Average
Interest Rate
 Amount 
Weighted-Average
Interest Rate
Short-term borrowings:        
Commercial paper sold through dealers, net of discounts $944,616
 2.46% $1,064,266
 1.87%
Commercial paper sold directly to members, at par 1,111,795
 2.52
 1,202,105
 1.89
Select notes 1,023,952
 2.70
 780,472
 2.04
Daily liquidity fund notes 298,817
 2.25
 400,635
 1.50
Medium-term notes sold to members 228,546
 2.87
 248,432
 1.90
Farmer Mac notes payable (1)
 
 
 100,000
 2.23
Total short-term borrowings $3,607,726
 2.56
 $3,795,910
 1.88
___________________________
(1)Advanced under the revolving note purchase agreement with Farmer Mac dated July 31, 2015. See “Note 7—Long-Term Debt” for additional information on this revolving note purchase agreement with Farmer Mac.

We issue commercial paper for periods of one to 270 days. We also issue select notes for periods ranging from 30 to 270 days. Select notes are unsecured obligations that do not require backup bank lines of credit for liquidity purposes. These notes require a larger minimum investment than our commercial paper sold to members and, as a result, offer a higher interest rate than our commercial paper. We also issue daily liquidity fund notes, which are unsecured obligations that do not require backup bank lines of credit for liquidity purposes. We also issue medium-term notes, which represent unsecured obligations that may be issued through dealers in the capital markets or directly to our members.


We have master repurchase agreements with counterparties whereby we may sell investment-grade corporate debt securities from our investment portfolio subject to an obligation to repurchase the same or similar securities at an agreed-upon price and date. Transactions under these repurchase agreements are accounted for as collateralized financing agreements and not as a sale. The obligation to repurchase the securities is reported as securities sold under repurchase agreements, which we include as a component of short-term borrowings on our consolidated balance sheets. We disclose the fair value of the debt securities underlying repurchase transactions; however, the pledged debt securities remain in the investment debt securities portfolio amount reported on our consolidated balance sheets. We had no borrowings under repurchase agreements outstanding as of May 31, 2022; therefore, we had no debt securities in our investment portfolio pledged as collateral as of May 31, 2022. We had borrowings under repurchase agreements of $200 million as of May 31, 2021, and we had pledged debt securities underlying these repurchase transactions with a fair value of $211 million as of May 31, 2021.



128

NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Committed Bank Revolving Line of Credit Agreements


We had $2,975 million and $3,085 million of commitmentsThe following table presents the amount available for access under committedour bank revolving line of credit agreements as of May 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Under our current committed bank revolving line2022.

Table 6.2: Committed Bank Revolving Line of credit agreements, we have the ability to request up to $300 million of letters of credit, which would result in a reduction in the remaining available amount under the facilities.Credit Agreements Available Amounts

 May 31, 2022  
(Dollars in millions)Total CommitmentLetters of Credit Outstanding Amount Available for AccessMaturity
Annual Facility Fee (1)
Bank revolving line of credit term:
3-year agreement$1,245 $ $1,245 November 28, 20247.5 bps
5-year agreement1,355 3 1,352 November 28, 202510.0 bps
Total$2,600 $3 $2,597   
On November 28, 2018, we amended the three-year and five-year committed bank revolving line of credit agreements to extend the maturity dates to November 28, 2021 and November 28, 2023, respectively, and to terminate certain third-party bank commitments totaling $53 million under the three-year agreement and $57 million under the five-year agreement. As a result, the total commitment amount from third-parties under the three-year facility and the five-year facility is $1,440 million and $1,535 million, respectively, resulting in a combined total commitment amount under the two facilities of $2,975 million.___________________________





NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





The following table presents the total commitment, the net amount available for use and the outstanding letters of credit under our committed bank revolving line of credit agreements as of May 31, 2019 and 2018.
  May 31,    
  2019 2018    
(Dollars in millions) Total Commitment Letters of Credit Outstanding Net Available for Use Total Commitment Letters of Credit Outstanding Net Available for Use Maturity 
Annual Facility Fee (1)
3-year agreement, 2020 $
 $
 $
 $1,492
 $
 $1,492
 November 20, 2020 7.5 bps
3-year agreement, 2021 1,440
 
 1,440
 
 
 
 November 28, 2021 7.5 bps
Total 3-year agreement 1,440
 
 1,440
 1,492
 
 1,492
    
                 
5-year agreement, 2022 
 
 
 1,593
 3
 1,590
 November 20, 2022 10 bps
5-year agreement, 2023 1,535
 3
 1,532
 
 
 
 November 28, 2023 10 bps
Total 5-year agreement 1,535
 3
 1,532
 1,593
 3
 1,590
    
Total $2,975
 $3
 $2,972
 $3,085
 $3
 $3,082
    
___________________________
(1) Facility fee determined by CFC’s senior unsecured credit ratings based on the pricing schedules put in place at the inception of the related agreement.


On June 7, 2021, we amended the three-year and five-year committed bank revolving line of credit agreements to extend the maturity dates to November 28, 2024 and November 28, 2025, respectively, and to terminate certain bank commitments totaling $70 million under the three-year agreement and $55 million under the five-year agreement. As a result, the total commitment amount under the three-year facility and the five-year facility is $1,245 million and $1,355 million, respectively, resulting in a combined total commitment amount under the 2 facilities of $2,600 million. These agreements allow us to request up to $300 million of letters of credit, which, if requested, results in a reduction in the total amount available for our use.

We had nodid not have any outstanding borrowings outstanding under our committed bank revolving line of credit agreements as of May 31, 2019 and 2018, and2022; however, we had letters of credit outstanding of $3 million under the five-year committed bank revolving agreement as of this date. We were in compliance with all covenants and conditions under the agreements as of each respective date.

NOTE 7—LONG-TERM DEBT

The following table displays, by debt product type, long-term debt outstanding, and the weighted-average interest rate and maturity date as of May 31, 2022 and 2021. Long-term debt outstanding totaled $21,545 million and accounted for 75% of total debt outstanding as of May 31, 2022, compared with $20,603 million and 75% of total debt outstanding as of May 31, 2021. Long-term debt with fixed- and variable-rate accounted for 90% and 10%, respectively, of our total long-term debt outstanding as of May 31, 2022, compared with 89% and 11%, respectively, of our total long-term debt outstanding as of May 31, 2021.






129


NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS






NOTE 7—LONG-TERM DEBT
Table 7.1: Long-Term Debt—Debt Product Types and Weighted-Average Interest Rates

The following table displays long-term debt outstanding and the weighted-average interest rates, by debt type, as of
May 31, 2019 and 2018.
 May 31,May 31,
 2019 201820222021
(Dollars in thousands) Amount Weighted- Average
Interest Rate
 
Maturity
Date
 Amount Weighted- Average
Interest Rate
 
Maturity
Date
(Dollars in thousands)AmountWeighted- Average
Interest Rate
Maturity
Date
AmountWeighted- Average
Interest Rate
Maturity
Date
Unsecured long-term debt:         
Medium-term notes sold through dealers $2,962,375
 3.55% 2019-2032 $3,026,472
 3.51% 2018-2032
Medium-term notes sold to members 397,080
 3.03
 2019-2037 395,389
 2.56
 2018-2037
Subtotal medium-term notes 3,359,455
 3.49
 3,421,861
 3.40
 
Unamortized discount (931)   (1,256)   
Debt issuance costs (19,399)   (22,237)   
Total unsecured medium-term notes 3,339,125
   3,398,368
   
Unsecured notes payable: 13,701
 3.97
 2022-2023 18,892
 3.84
 2022-2023
Unamortized discount (187)   (277)   
Debt issuance costs (46)   (68)   
Total unsecured notes payable 13,468
 3.97
 18,547
 3.84
 
Total unsecured long-term debt 3,352,593
 3.49
 3,416,915
 3.40
 
Secured long-term debt:  
    
   Secured long-term debt:  
Collateral trust bonds 7,662,711
 3.19
 2019-2049 7,917,711
 3.89
 2018-2032Collateral trust bonds$7,097,711 3.17 %2023-2049$7,452,711 3.15 %2022-2049
Unamortized discount (244,643)   (250,421)   Unamortized discount(216,608)(227,046)
Debt issuance costs (34,336)   (28,197)   Debt issuance costs(32,613)(33,721)
Total collateral trust bonds 7,383,732
   7,639,093
   Total collateral trust bonds6,848,490 7,191,944 
Guaranteed Underwriter Program notes payable 5,410,507
 2.97
 2025-2039 4,856,375
 2.85
 2025-2038Guaranteed Underwriter Program notes payable6,105,473 2.69 2025-20526,269,303 2.76 2025-2041
Debt issuance costs 
   (232)   
Total Guaranteed Underwriter Program notes payable 5,410,507
   4,856,143
   
Farmer Mac notes payable 3,054,914
 3.33
 2019-2049 2,791,496
 2.90
 2018-2048Farmer Mac notes payable3,094,679 2.33 2022-20492,977,909 1.68 2021-2049
Other secured notes payable 9,225
 2.70
 2024 11,556
 2.74
 2024Other secured notes payable2,755 3.10 2022-20234,412 3.14 2021-2023
Debt issuance costs (178)   (243)   Debt issuance costs(9)(22)
Total other secured notes payable 9,047
   11,313
   Total other secured notes payable2,746 4,390 
Total secured notes payable 8,474,468
 3.10
 7,658,952
 2.87
 Total secured notes payable9,202,898 9,251,602 
Total secured long-term debt 15,858,200
 3.14
 15,298,045
 3.39
 Total secured long-term debt16,051,388 2.83 16,443,546 2.74 
Unsecured long-term debt:Unsecured long-term debt:   
Medium-term notes sold through dealersMedium-term notes sold through dealers5,263,496 2.20 2022-20323,943,728 2.31 2021-2032
Medium-term notes sold to membersMedium-term notes sold to members250,397 2.70 2022-2037232,346 2.61 2021-2037
Medium-term notes sold through dealers and to membersMedium-term notes sold through dealers and to members5,513,893 2.22 4,176,074 2.33 
Unamortized discountUnamortized discount(2,086)(2,307)
Debt issuance costsDebt issuance costs(19,723)(18,036)
Total unsecured medium-term notesTotal unsecured medium-term notes5,492,084 4,155,731 
Unsecured notes payableUnsecured notes payable1,979  2022-20233,886 — 2021-2023
Unamortized discountUnamortized discount(10)(35)
Debt issuance costs Debt issuance costs(1)(5)
Total unsecured notes payableTotal unsecured notes payable1,968 3,846 
Total unsecured long-term debtTotal unsecured long-term debt5,494,052 2.22 4,159,577 2.33 
Total long-term debt $19,210,793
 3.20
 $18,714,960
 3.39
 Total long-term debt$21,545,440 2.68 $20,603,123 2.66 





130


NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS







The following table presents the principal amount of long-term debt maturing in each of the five fiscal years subsequent to
May 31, 20192022 and thereafter.

(Dollars in thousands) Amount
Maturing
 
Weighted-Average
Interest Rate
2020 $1,638,048
 2.36%
2021 1,827,162
 2.73
2022 1,924,953
 2.93
2023 1,170,032
 2.75
2024 1,076,118
 3.18
Thereafter 11,574,480
 3.49
Total $19,210,793
 3.20
Table 7.2: Long-Term Debt—Maturities and Weighted-Average Interest Rates

(Dollars in thousands) Maturity AmountWeighted-Average
Interest Rate
2023$1,896,355 1.93 %
20242,143,516 1.91 
20252,211,643 1.85 
20262,419,500 2.98 
20271,602,329 1.94 
Thereafter11,543,147 3.14 
Total$21,816,490 2.68 
Medium-Term Notes

Secured Debt
Medium-term
Long-term secured debt of $16,051 million and $16,444 million as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, represented 75% and 80% of total long-term debt outstanding as of each respective date. The decrease in long-term secured debt of $393 million for the year ended May 31, 2022 was primarily attributable to the redemption of $850 million of collateral trust bonds, as described below, and Farmer Mac and Guaranteed Underwriter Program notes represent unsecured obligations that may be issued through dealerspayable repayments, partially offset by the $500 million collateral trust bonds issuance and borrowings under the Farmer Mac revolving note purchase agreement and the Guaranteed Underwriter Program. We were in compliance with all covenants and conditions under our debt indentures as of May 31, 2022 and 2021.

We are required to pledge eligible mortgage notes in an amount at least equal to the capital markets or directly tooutstanding balance of our members.secured debt. See “Note 4—Loans” for information on pledged collateral under our secured debt agreements.


Collateral Trust Bonds


Collateral trust bonds represent secured obligations sold to investors in the capital markets. Collateral trust bonds are secured by the pledge of mortgage notes or eligible securities in an amount at least equal to the principal balance of the bonds outstanding.


On July 12, 2018, we redeemed $300Collateral trust bonds outstanding decreased $343 million to $6,848 million as of May 31, 2022, primarily due to the redemptions of $400 million of the $1 billion 10.375%3.05% of collateral trust bonds due November 1, 2018 at a premium of $7 million. We repaid the remaining $700February 15, 2022 and $450 million of these bonds on the maturity date.

On October 31, 2018, we issued $325 million aggregate principal amount2.40% of 3.90% collateral trust bonds due 2028 and $300 million aggregate principal amountApril 25, 2022, partially offset by the February 7, 2022 issuance of 4.40% collateral trust bonds due 2048.

On January 31, 2019, we issued $450 million aggregate principal amount of 3.70% collateral trust bonds due 2029 and $500 million aggregate principal amount of 4.30%2.75% of collateral trust bonds due 2049.April 15, 2032.


SecuredGuaranteed Underwriter Program Notes Payable


We hadNotes payable outstanding secured notes payable totaling $5,411under the Guaranteed Underwriter Program decreased $164 million and $4,856to $6,105 million as of May 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, under bond purchase agreements with the Federal Financing Bank and a bond guarantee agreement with RUS issued2022 due to notes payable repayments, partially offset by notes payable advances under the Guaranteed Underwriter Program, which provides guarantees to the Federal Financing Bank. We pay RUS a fee of 30 basis points per year on the total amount outstanding. Program. On November 15, 2018,4, 2021, we closed on a $750$550 million committed loan facility (“Series N”S”) from the Federal Financing Bank under the GuaranteedGuaranteed Underwriter Program. Pursuant to this facility, we may borrow any time before July 15, 2023.2026. Each advance is subject to quarterly amortization and a final maturity not longer than 2030 years from the advance date. Duringdate of the advance. We borrowed $450 million and repaid $614 million of notes payable outstanding under the Guaranteed Underwriter Program during the year ended May 31, 2019, we borrowed $625 million under our committed loan facilities with the Federal Financing Bank.2022. We had up to $1,350 $1,075 million available for access under the Guaranteed Underwriter Program as of May 31, 2019.2022.



131

NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The notes outstanding under the Guaranteed Underwriter Program contain a provision that if during any portion of the fiscal year, our senior secured credit ratings do not have at least two of the following ratings: (i) A3 or higher from Moody’s, (ii)




NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





A- or higher from S&P, (iii) A- or higher from Fitch or (iv) an equivalent rating from a successor rating agency to any of the above rating agencies, we may not make cash patronage capital distributions in excess of 5% of total patronage capital.
We are required to pledge eligible distribution system or power supply system loans as collateral in an amount at least equal to the total principal amount of notes outstanding under the Guaranteed Underwriter Program. See “Note 4—Loans” for additional information on the collateral pledged to secure notes payable under this program.


Farmer Mac Notes Payable

We have two revolving note purchase agreements with Farmer Mac, which together allow us to borrow up to $5,500 million from Farmer Mac. Under our firsta revolving note purchase agreement with Farmer Mac, dated March 24, 2011, as amended, under which we can currently borrow up to $5,500 million from Farmer Mac, at any time, subject to market conditions up to $5,200 million at any time through January 11, 2022, and such date shall automatically extend on each anniversary date ofJune 30, 2026, with successive automatic one-year renewals without notice by either party. Beginning June 30, 2025, the closing for an additional year, unless prior to any such anniversary date, Farmer Mac provides us with a notice that the draw period will not be extended beyond the remaining term. This revolving note purchase agreement allows usis subject to termination of the draw period by Farmer Mac upon 425 days’ prior written notice. Pursuant to this revolving note purchase agreement, we can borrow, repay and re-borrow funds at any time through maturity, as market conditions permit, provided that the outstanding principal amount at any time does not exceed the total available under the agreement. Each borrowing under the revolving note purchase agreement is evidenced by a pricing agreement setting forth the interest rate, maturity date and other related terms as we may negotiate with Farmer Mac at the time of each such borrowing. We may select a fixed rate or variable rate at the time of each advance with a maturity as determined in the applicable pricing agreement. UnderThe amount outstanding under this note purchase agreement with Farmer Mac, we had outstanding secured notes payable totaling $3,055included $3,095 million and $2,791 million,of long-term debt as of May 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.2022. We borrowed $575advanced long-term notes payable totaling $720 million under this note purchase agreement withthe Farmer Mac Note Purchase Agreement during the year ended May 31, 2019.2022. The amount available for borrowing totaled $2,405 million as of May 31, 2022.


Under our secondOn June 15, 2022, we amended the revolving note purchase agreement with Farmer Mac dated July 31, 2015, as amended, we can borrow up to $300increase the maximum borrowing availability to $6,000 million at any time through December 20, 2023 at a fixed spread over LIBOR. This agreement also allows usfrom $5,500 million, and extend the draw period from June 30, 2026 to borrow, repay and re-borrow funds at any time through maturity, provided that the outstanding principal amount at any time does not exceed the total available under the agreement. PriorJune 30, 2027, with successive automatic one-year renewals without notice by either party, subject to the maturity date,termination of the draw period by Farmer Mac may terminate the agreement upon 30 days425 days’ prior written notice to us on periodic facility renewal dates, the firstnotice.

Unsecured Debt

Long-term unsecured debt of which was January 31, 2019. Subsequent facility renewal dates are on each June 20 or December 20 thereafter until the maturity date. We may terminate the agreement upon 30 days written notice at any time. We did not have any outstanding notes payable under this revolving note purchase agreement with Farmer Mac$5,494 million and $4,160 million as of May 31, 2019. Under2022 and 2021, respectively, represented 25% and 20% of total long-term debt outstanding as of each respective date. The increase in long-term unsecured debt of $1,334 million for the terms of the first revolving note purchase agreement with Farmer Macyear ended May 31, 2022 was primarily attributable to dealer medium-term notes issuance, as described above, the $5,200 million commitment will increase to $5,500 millionbelow, partially offset by dealer medium-term notes repayments.

Medium-Term Notes

Medium-term notes represent unsecured obligations that may be issued through dealers in the event the second revolving note purchase agreement is terminated.capital markets or directly to our members.


We are required to pledge eligible distribution system or power supply system loans as collateral in an amount at least equal to the totalOn October 18, 2021, we issued $400 million aggregate principal amount of dealer medium-term notes outstanding under eachat a fixed rate of our Farmer Mac revolving note purchase agreements. See “Note 4—Loans” for additional information1.000%, due on October 18, 2024, and $350 million aggregate principal amount of dealer medium-term notes at a variable rate based on the collateral pledged to secureSecured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) plus 0.33%, due on October 18, 2024. On February 7, 2022, we issued $600 million aggregate principal amount of dealer medium-term notes payable under these programs.at a fixed rate of 1.875% due on February 7, 2025. On February 7, 2022, we also issued $400 million aggregate principal amount of dealer medium-term notes at a variable rate based on SOFR plus 0.40%, due on August 7, 2023. On May 4, 2022, we issued $300 million aggregate principal amount of 3.450% fixed-rate dealer medium-term notes due June 15, 2025. On May 9, 2022, we issued $100 million aggregate principal amount of 3.859% fixed-rate dealer medium-term notes due June 15, 2029.


We were in compliance with all covenants and conditions under our senior debt indentures as of May 31, 2019 and 2018.


132

NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 8—SUBORDINATED DEFERRABLE DEBT


Subordinated deferrable debt isrepresents long-term debt that is subordinated to our outstandingall debt and senior toother than subordinated certificates held by our members. Our 4.75% and 5.25% subordinated debt due 2043 and 2046, respectively, was issued for a term of up to 30 years, pays interest semi-annually, may be called at par after 10 years, converts to a variable rate after 10 years and allows us to defer the payment of interest for one or more consecutive interest periods not exceeding five consecutive years. Our 5.50% subordinated debt due 2064 was issued for a term of up to 45 years, pays interest quarterly, may be called at par after five years and allows us to defer the payment of interest for one or more consecutive interest periods not exceeding 40 consecutive quarterly periods. To date, we have not exercised our right to defer interest payments.


The following table presents, by issuance, subordinated deferrable debt outstanding and the weighted-average interest rates as of
May 31, 20192022 and 2018.2021.



Table 8.1: Subordinated Deferrable Debt Outstanding and Weighted-Average Interest Rates

May 31,
 20222021Maturity and Call Dates
(Dollars in thousands)Outstanding AmountWeighted- Average
Interest Rate
Outstanding AmountWeighted-Average
Interest Rate
Term in YearsMaturityCall Date
Issuances of subordinated notes:
4.75% issuance 2013$400,000 4.75 %$400,000 4.75 %302043April 30, 2023
5.25% issuance 2016350,000 5.25 350,000 5.25 302046April 20, 2026
5.50% issuance 2019250,000 5.50 250,000 5.50 452064May 15, 2024
Total aggregate principal amount1,000,000 1,000,000 
Debt issuance costs(13,482)(13,685)
Total subordinated deferrable debt$986,518 5.11 $986,315 5.11 


NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





  May 31,
  2019 2018
(Dollars in thousands) Amount 
Weighted- Average
Interest Rate
 Amount 
Weighted-Average
Interest Rate
4.75% due 2043 with a call date of April 30, 2023 $400,000
 4.75% $400,000
 4.75%
5.25% due 2046 with a call date of April 20, 2026 350,000
 5.25
 350,000
 5.25
5.50% due 2064 with a call date of May 15, 2024 250,000
 5.50
 
 
Debt issuance costs (13,980)   (7,590)  
Total subordinated deferrable debt $986,020
 5.11
 $742,410
 4.98
NOTE 9—MEMBERS’ SUBORDINATED CERTIFICATES


Membership Subordinated Certificates


Prior to June 2009, CFC members were required to purchase membership subordinated certificates as a condition of membership prior to June 2009.membership. Such certificates are interest-bearing, unsecured, subordinated debt. Membership certificates typically have an original maturity of 100 years and pay interest at 5% semi-annually. No requirementrequirement to purchase membership certificates has existed for NCSC or RTFC members.


Loan and Guarantee Subordinated Certificates


Members obtaining long-term loans, certain line of credit loans or guarantees may be required to purchase additional loan or guarantee subordinated certificates with each such loan or guarantee based on the borrower’s debt-to-equity ratio with CFC. These certificates are unsecured, subordinated debt and may be interest bearing or non-interest bearing.


Under our current policy, most borrowers requesting standard loans are not required to buy subordinated certificates as a condition of a loan or guarantee. Borrowers meeting certain criteria, including but not limited to, high leverage ratios, or borrowers requesting large facilities, may be required to purchase loan or guarantee subordinated certificates or member


133

NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

capital securities (described below) as a condition of the loan. Loan subordinated certificates have the same maturity as the related long-term loan. Some certificates may amortize annually based on the outstanding loan balance.


The interest rates payable on guarantee subordinated certificates purchased in conjunction with our guarantee program vary in accordance with applicable CFC policy. Guarantee subordinated certificates have the same maturity as the related guarantee.


Member Capital Securities


CFC offers member capital securities to its voting members. Member capital securities are interest-bearing, unsecured obligations of CFC, which are subordinate to all existing and future senior and subordinated indebtedness of CFC held by non-members of CFC, but rank proportionally to our member subordinated certificates. Member capital securities mature 30 years from the date of issuance, typically pay interest at 5% and are callable at par at our option 10 years from the date of issuance and anytime thereafter. The interest rate for new member capital securities issuance is set at the time of issuance. These securities represent voluntary investments in CFC by the members.





NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





Subsequent to May 31, 2022, we revised the interest rate to 5.50% and updated the call option to five years for new member capital securities issuances. The following table displays members’ subordinated certificates and the weighted-average interest rates as of May 31, 20192022 and 2018.
2021.
  May 31,
  2019 2018
(Dollars in thousands) 
Amounts
Outstanding
 
Weighted-
Average
Interest Rate
 
Amounts
Outstanding
 
Weighted-
Average
Interest Rate
Membership subordinated certificates:        
Certificates maturing 2020 through 2119 $630,466
   $630,173
  
Subscribed and unissued (1)
 8
   275
  
Total membership subordinated certificates 630,474
 4.95% 630,448
 4.94%
Loan and guarantee subordinated certificates:        
Interest-bearing loan subordinated certificates maturing through 2045 290,259
   300,738
  
Non-interest-bearing loan subordinated certificates maturing through 2047 150,152
   162,263
  
Subscribed and unissued (1)
 45
   57
  
Total loan subordinated certificates 440,456
 2.73
 463,058
 2.71
Interest-bearing guarantee subordinated certificates maturing through 2044 47,878
   48,177
  
Non-interest-bearing guarantee subordinated certificates maturing through 2043 17,151
   17,151
  
Total guarantee subordinated certificates 65,029
 4.49
 65,328
 4.50
Total loan and guarantee subordinated certificates 505,485
 2.95
 528,386
 2.93
Member capital securities:        
Securities maturing through 2048 221,170
 5.00
 221,148
 5.00
Total members’ subordinated certificates $1,357,129
 4.21
 $1,379,982
 4.18

___________________________Table 9.1: Members’ Subordinated Certificates Outstanding and Weighted-Average Interest Rates
May 31,
 20222021
(Dollars in thousands)Amounts
Outstanding
Weighted-
Average
Interest Rate
Amounts
Outstanding
Weighted-
Average
Interest Rate
Membership subordinated certificates:    
Certificates maturing 2025 through 2119$628,591 $628,582 
Subscribed and unissued (1)
12 12 
Total membership subordinated certificates628,603 4.95 %628,594 4.95 %
Loan and guarantee subordinated certificates:
Interest-bearing loan subordinated certificates maturing through 2045216,266 223,067 
Non-interest-bearing loan subordinated certificates maturing through 2047121,744 132,203 
Subscribed and unissued (1)
45 45 
Total loan subordinated certificates338,055 2.64 355,315 2.61 
Interest-bearing guarantee subordinated certificates maturing through 204427,333 5.90 31,581 6.06 
Total loan and guarantee subordinated certificates365,388 2.88 386,896 2.89 
Member capital securities:
Securities maturing through 2052240,170 5.00 239,170 5.00 
Total members’ subordinated certificates$1,234,161 4.35 $1,254,660 4.32 
___________________________
(1) The subscribed and unissued subordinated certificates represent subordinated certificates that members are required to purchase. Upon collection of full payment of the subordinated certificate amount, the certificate will be reclassified from subscribed and unissued to outstanding.


The weighted-average maturity for all membership subordinated certificates outstandingoutstanding was 57 years55 and 58 years 56 years as of May 31, 20192022 and 2018, respectively.2021, respectively. The following table presents the amount of members’ subordinated certificates maturing in each of the five fiscal years followingsubsequent to May 31, 20192022 and thereafter.


134

(Dollars in thousands) 
Amount
Maturing(1)
 
Weighted-Average
Interest Rate
2020 $9,178
 2.61%
2021 41,776
 3.73
2022 14,471
 2.91
2023 23,922
 3.53
2024 16,457
 2.32
Thereafter 1,251,272
 4.29
     Total $1,357,076
 4.21
___________________________




NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS






Table 9.2: Members’ Subordinated Certificate Maturities and Weighted-Average Interest Rates
(Dollars in thousands)
Amount
Maturing(1)
Weighted-Average
Interest Rate
2023$17,034 4.00 %
20248,092 2.19 
20258,594 2.47 
202653,515 2.92 
20278,716 1.87 
Thereafter1,138,153 4.47 
     Total$1,234,104 4.35 
___________________________
(1)Excludes $0.05Excludes $0.06 million in subscribed and unissued member subordinated certificates for which a payment has been received, but no certificate has been issued. Amortizing member loan subordinated certificates totaling $254$175 million are amortizing annually based on the unpaid principal balance of the related loan. Amortization payments on these certificates totaled $17$12 million in fiscal year 20192022 and represented 7% of amortizing loan subordinated certificates outstanding.

NOTE 10—DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES


We are an end user of derivative financial instruments and do not engage in derivative trading. We use derivatives, primarily interest rate swaps and Treasury rate locks, to manage interest rate risk. Derivatives may be privately negotiated contracts, which are often referred to as OTC derivatives, or they may be listed and traded on an exchange. We generally engage in OTC derivative transactions. Our derivative instruments are an integral part of our interest rate risk-management strategy. Our principal purpose in using derivatives is to manage our aggregate interest rate risk profile within prescribed risk parameters. The derivative instruments we use primarily consist of interest rate swaps, which we typically hold to maturity. In addition, we may on occasion use treasury locks to manage the interest rate risk associated with future debt issuance or debt that is scheduled to reprice in the future.


Outstanding Notional Amount and Maturities of Derivatives Not Designated as Accounting Hedges


The notional amount provides an indication of the volume of our derivatives activity, but this amount is not recorded on our consolidated balance sheets. The notional amount is used only as the basis on which interest payments are determined and is not the amount exchanged.exchanged, nor recorded on our consolidated balance sheets. The following table shows, by derivative instrument type, the outstanding notional amounts andamount, the weighted-average rate paid and the weighted-average interest rate received for our interest rate swaps by type, as of May 31, 20192022 and 2018. The2021. For the substantial majority of our interest rate swaps use answap agreements, a LIBOR index based onis currently used as the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”)basis for either the pay or receive leg of the swap agreement.determining variable interest payment amounts each period.

Table 10.1: Derivative Notional Amount and Weighted-Average Rates
May 31,
 20222021
(Dollars in thousands)Notional
Amount
Weighted-
Average
Rate Paid
Weighted-
Average
Rate Received
Notional
Amount
Weighted-
Average
Rate Paid
Weighted-
Average
Rate Received
Pay-fixed swaps$5,957,631 2.60 %1.24 %$6,579,516 2.65 %0.20 %
Receive-fixed swaps1,980,000 1.53 2.86 2,399,000 0.92 2.80 
Subtotal7,937,631 2.33 1.64 8,978,516 2.19 0.89 
Forward pay-fixed swaps124,000 — 
Total interest rate swaps$8,061,631 $8,978,516 




135

  May 31,
  2019 2018
(Dollars in thousands) 
Notional
Amount
 
Weighted-
Average
Rate Paid
 
Weighted-
Average
Rate Received
 Notional
Amount
 Weighted-
Average
Rate Paid
 Weighted-
Average
Rate Received
Pay-fixed swaps $7,379,280
 2.83% 2.60% $6,987,999
 2.83% 2.30%
Receive-fixed swaps 3,399,000
 3.25
 2.56
 3,824,000
 2.93
 2.50
Total interest rate swaps 10,778,280
 2.97
 2.58
 10,811,999
 2.86
 2.37
Forward pay-fixed swaps 65,000
     256,154
    
Total $10,843,280
     $11,068,153
    
NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The following table presents the maturities, for each of the next five fiscal years and thereafter based on the notional amount of our interest rate swaps as of May 31, 2019.2022.

  Notional Amount Notional Amortization and Maturities
(Dollars in thousands)  2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Thereafter
Interest rate swaps $10,843,280 $1,311,765 $471,500 $764,282 $337,211 $668,924 $7,289,598
Table 10.2: Derivative Notional Amount Maturities

 Notional AmountNotional Amortization and Maturities
(Dollars in thousands)20232024202520262027Thereafter
Interest rate swaps$8,061,631$542,398$615,574$100,000$787,895$43,751$5,972,013

Cash Flow HedgeHedges


In anticipation of the repricing of $100 million in notes payable outstanding under the Guaranteed Underwriter Program,On July 20, 2021, we entered into aexecuted 2 treasury rate lock agreementagreements with aan aggregate notional amount of $100$250 million to lock in the underlying U.S. Treasury interest rate component of interest rate payments on May 25, 2018.anticipated debt issuances and repricings. The agreement,treasury locks, which waswere scheduled to mature on October 12, 2018, was29, 2021, were designated and qualified as a cash flow hedgehedges. In October 2021, we borrowed $250 million under our Farmer Mac revolving note purchase agreement and terminated the treasury locks. Prior to this anticipated borrowing and the termination of the forecasted transaction. Wetreasury locks, we recorded an unrealized losschanges in AOCI of $1 million as of May 31, 2018 related to this cash flow hedge. On September 25, 2018, we terminated this cash flow hedge as the forecasted transaction was no longer expected to occur. Upon termination, the fair value of the derivative had shifted totreasury locks in AOCI. At termination, the treasury locks were in a gain position of $1$5 million, of which $4 million is being accreted from a lossAOCI to interest expense over the term of $1 millionthe related Farmer Mac borrowings and the remainder was recognized in earnings. We did not have any derivatives designated as accounting hedges as of May 31, 2018. We reversed2022 or 2021.





NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





the loss recorded in AOCI and recognized the gain in earnings as a component of derivative gains on our consolidated statements of operations.

Impact of Derivatives on Consolidated Balance Sheets


The following table displays the fair value of the derivative assets and derivative liabilities, by derivatives type, recorded on our consolidated balance sheets and the related outstanding notional amount of our interest rate swaps by derivatives type as of May 31, 20192022 and 2018.2021.

Table 10.3: Derivative Assets and Liabilities at Fair Value
 May 31,May 31,
 2019 2018 20222021
(Dollars in thousands) Fair Value Notional Balance Fair Value Notional Balance(Dollars in thousands)Fair Value
Notional Amount(1)
Fair ValueNotional Amount
Derivative assets:        Derivative assets:
Interest rate swaps $41,179
 $2,332,104
 $244,526
 $5,264,971
Interest rate swaps$222,042 $4,791,699 $121,259 $2,560,618 
Total derivative assetsTotal derivative assets$222,042 $4,791,699 $121,259 $2,560,618 
        
Derivative liabilities:        Derivative liabilities:
Treasury rate lock—cash flow hedge $
 $
 $1,059
 $100,000
Interest rate swaps 391,724
 8,511,176
 274,873
 5,803,182
Interest rate swaps$128,282 $3,269,932 $584,989 $6,417,898 
Total derivative liabilities $391,724
 $8,511,176
 $275,932
 $5,903,182
Total derivative liabilities$128,282 $3,269,932 $584,989 $6,417,898 
____________________________

(1) The notional amount includes $124 million notional amount of forward starting swaps, as shown above in Table 10.1: Derivative Notional Amount and Weighted-Average Rates, with an effective start date subsequent to May 31, 2022, outstanding as of May 31, 2022. The fair value of these swaps as of May 31, 2022 is included in the above table and in our consolidated financial statements.

All of our master swap agreements include netting provisions that allow for offsetting of all contracts with a given counterparty in the event of default by one of the two parties. However, as indicated above, in “Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” we report derivative asset and liability amounts on a gross basis by individual contracts.contract. The following table presents the gross fair value of derivative assets and liabilities reported on our consolidated balance sheets as of May 31, 20192022 and 2018,2021, and provides information on the impact of netting provisions under our master swap agreements and collateral pledged.pledged, if any.



136

  May 31, 2019
  
Gross Amount
of Recognized
Assets/ Liabilities
 
Gross Amount
Offset in the
Balance Sheet
 
Net Amount of Assets/ Liabilities
Presented
in the
Balance Sheet
 
Gross Amount
Not Offset in the
Balance Sheet
  
(Dollars in thousands)    
Financial
Instruments
 
Cash
Collateral
Pledged
 
Net
Amount
Derivative assets:            
Interest rate swaps $41,179
 $
 $41,179
 $41,176
 $
 $3
Derivative liabilities:            
Interest rate swaps 391,724
 
 391,724
 41,176
 
 350,548






NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS






  May 31, 2018
  Gross Amount
of Recognized
Assets/ Liabilities
 Gross Amount
Offset in the
Balance Sheet
 Net Amount of Assets/ Liabilities
Presented
in the
Balance Sheet
 Gross Amount
Not Offset in the
Balance Sheet
  
(Dollars in thousands)    Financial
Instruments
 Cash
Collateral
Pledged
 Net
Amount
Derivative assets:            
Interest rate swaps $244,526
 $
 $244,526
 $196,633
 $
 $47,893
Derivative liabilities:            
Treasury rate lock—cash flow hedge 1,059
   1,059
     1,059
Interest rate swaps 274,873
 
 274,873
 196,633
 
 78,240
Table 10.4: Derivative Gross and Net Amounts

May 31, 2022
Gross Amount
of Recognized
Assets/ Liabilities
Gross Amount
Offset in the
Balance Sheet
Net Amount of Assets/ Liabilities
Presented
in the
Balance Sheet
Gross Amount
Not Offset in the
Balance Sheet
(Dollars in thousands)Financial
Instruments
Cash
Collateral
Pledged
Net
Amount
Derivative assets:
Interest rate swaps$222,042 $ $222,042 $103,228 $ $118,814 
Derivative liabilities:
Interest rate swaps128,282  128,282 103,228  25,054 
May 31, 2021
Gross Amount
of Recognized
Assets/ Liabilities
Gross Amount
Offset in the
Balance Sheet
Net Amount of Assets/ Liabilities
Presented
in the
Balance Sheet
Gross Amount
Not Offset in the
Balance Sheet
(Dollars in thousands)Financial
Instruments
Cash
Collateral
Pledged
Net
Amount
Derivative assets:
Interest rate swaps$121,259 $— $121,259 $121,259 $— $— 
Derivative liabilities:
Interest rate swaps584,989 — 584,989 121,259 — 463,730 

Impact of Derivatives on Consolidated Statements of Operations


DerivativeThe primary factors affecting the fair value of our derivatives and the derivative gains (losses) recorded in our consolidated statements of operations include changes in interest rates, the shape of the swap curve and the composition of our derivative portfolio. We generally record derivative losses when interest rates decline and derivative gains when interest rates rise, as our derivative portfolio consists of a higher proportion of pay-fixed swaps than receive-fixed swaps.

The following table presents the components of the derivative gains (losses) reported in our consolidated statements of operations consist of derivative cash settlements expensefor fiscal years 2022, 2021 and derivative forward value gains (losses).2020. Derivative cash settlements interest expense represents the net periodic contractual interest expense accruals onamount for our interest rate swaps during the reporting period. The derivativeDerivative forward value gains (losses) represent the change in fair value of our interest rate swaps during the reporting period due to changes in the estimate ofexpected future interest rates over the remaining life of our derivative contracts.

The following table presents the components of We classify the derivative gains (losses) reportedcash settlement amounts for the net periodic contractual interest expense on our interest rate swaps as an operating activity in our consolidated statements of operations for our interest rate swaps for fiscal years 2019, 2018 and 2017.cash flows.

Table 10.5: Derivative Gains (Losses)
Year Ended May 31,
(Dollars in thousands)202220212020
Derivative gains (losses) attributable to:
Derivative cash settlements interest expense$(101,385)$(115,645)$(55,873)
Derivative forward value gains (losses)557,867 621,946 (734,278)
Derivative gains (losses)$456,482 $506,301 $(790,151)



137

NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

  Year Ended May 31,
(Dollars in thousands) 2019 2018 2017
Derivative gains (losses) attributable to:      
Derivative cash settlements expense $(43,611) $(74,281) $(84,478)
Derivative forward value gains (losses) (319,730) 306,002
 179,381
Derivative gains (losses) $(363,341) $231,721
 $94,903

As noted above, during fiscal year 2018, we entered into a treasury rate lock agreement that was designated as a cash flow hedge of a forecasted transaction. This cash flow hedge was terminated on September 25, 2018 and a gain of $1 million was recorded upon termination as a component of derivative cash settlements expense in on our consolidated statements of operations.

Credit Risk-Related Contingent Features


Our derivative contracts typically contain mutual early-termination provisions, generally in the form of a credit rating trigger. Under the mutual credit rating trigger provisions, either counterparty may, but is not obligated to, terminate and settle the agreement if the credit rating of the other counterparty falls below a level specified in the agreement. If a derivative contract is terminated, the amount to be received or paid by us would be equal to the prevailing fair value, as defined in the agreement, as of the termination date.


On December 13, 2021, S&P affirmed CFC’s credit ratings and stable outlook under its revised criteria and updated methodology for rating financial institutions published on December 9, 2021. On December 16, 2021, Moody’s affirmed CFC’s credit ratings and stable outlook. On February 4, 2022, Fitch issued a credit ratings report review of CFC in which Fitch affirmed CFC’s credit ratings and stable outlook. Our senior unsecured credit ratings from Moody’s, and S&P and Fitch were A2, A- and A, respectively, as of May 31, 2019. Both2022. Moody’s, S&P and S&PFitch had our ratings on stable outlook as of May 31, 2019. 2022. Our credit ratings and outlook remain unchanged as of the date of this Report.

The following tabledisplays the notional amounts of our derivative contracts with rating triggers as of May 31, 2019,2022, and the payments that would be required if the contracts were terminated as of that date because of a downgrade of our unsecured credit ratings or the counterparty’s unsecured credit




NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





ratings below A3/A-, below Baa1/BBB+, to or below Baa2/BBB, below Baa3/BBB-, or to or below Ba2/BB+ by Moody’s or S&P, respectively. In calculating the payment amounts that would be required upon termination of the derivative contracts, we assumedassume that the amounts for each counterparty would be netted in accordance with the provisions of the master netting agreements for eachwith the counterparty. The net payment amounts are based on the fair value of the underlying derivative instrument, excluding the credit risk valuation adjustment, plus any unpaid accrued interest amounts.


Table 10.6: Derivative Credit Rating Trigger Exposure
(Dollars in thousands) 
Notional
Amount
 Payable Due from CFC Receivable Due to CFC Net (Payable)/Receivable(Dollars in thousands)Notional
Amount
Payable Due from CFCReceivable Due to CFCNet Receivable (Payable)
Impact of rating downgrade trigger:        Impact of rating downgrade trigger:    
Falls below A3/A-(1)
 $50,460

$(9,379)
$

$(9,379)
Falls below A3/A-(1)
$36,110 $(3,834)$ $(3,834)
Falls below Baa1/BBB+ 7,024,759
 (224,501) 5
 (224,496)Falls below Baa1/BBB+5,503,211 (23,253)77,069 53,816 
Falls to or below Baa2/BBB (2)
 562,062
 (7,132) 
 (7,132)
Falls to or below Baa2/BBB (2)
326,897  5,862 5,862 
Falls below Baa3/BBB- 221,865

(12,292)


(12,292)
Total $7,859,146

$(253,304)
$5

$(253,299)Total$5,866,218 $(27,087)$82,931 $55,844 
___________________________
(1)Rating trigger for CFC falls below A3/A-, while rating trigger for counterparty falls below Baa1/BBB+ by Moody’s or S&P, respectively.
(2)Rating trigger for CFC falls to or below Baa2/BBB, while rating trigger for counterparty falls to or below Ba2/BB+ by Moody’s or S&P, respectively.


We have outstanding notional amount of derivativesinterest rate swaps with one1 counterparty that are subject to a ratings trigger and early termination provision in the event of a downgrade of CFC’s senior unsecured credit ratings below Baa3, BBB- or BBB- by Moody’s, S&P or Fitch, respectively, respectively. The outstanding notional amount of these swaps, which is not included in the above table, totaling $165totaled $233 million as of May 31, 2019.2022. These contractsswaps were in an unrealized lossgain position of $20$13 million as of May 31, 2019.2022.


Our largest counterparty exposure, based on the outstanding notional amount, accounted for approximately 23% and 24% of the total outstanding notional amount of derivatives as of both May 31, 20192022 and 2018, respectively.2021. The aggregate fair value amount, including the credit valuation adjustment, of all interest rate swaps with rating triggers that were in a net liability position was $26627 million as of May 31, 2019.
2022.


138
NOTE 11—EQUITY

Total equity decreased by $202 million to $1,304 million as of May 31, 2019. The decrease was primarily attributable to our reported net loss of $151 million for the year ended May 31, 2019 and the patronage capital retirement of $48 million in August 2018. The following table presents the components of equity as of May 31, 2019 and 2018.





NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS








May 31,
(Dollars in thousands)
2019
2018
Membership fees
$969

$969
Educational fund
2,013

1,976
Total membership fees and educational fund
2,982

2,945
Patronage capital allocated
860,578

811,493
Members’ capital reserve
759,097

687,785
Unallocated net income (loss):
   
Prior year-end cumulative derivative forward value losses
(30,831)
(332,525)
Current year derivative forward value gains (losses)(1)

(318,134)
301,694
Current year-end cumulative derivative forward value losses
(348,965)
(30,831)
Other unallocated net income (loss)
3,190

(5,603)
Unallocated net income (loss)
(345,775)
(36,434)
CFC retained equity
1,276,882

1,465,789
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
(147)
8,544
Total CFC equity
1,276,735

1,474,333
Noncontrolling interests
27,147

31,520
Total equity
$1,303,882

$1,505,853
NOTE 11—EQUITY
____________________________
Total equity increased $742 million to $2,142 million as of May 31, 2022, attributable primarily to our reported net income of $799 million for the year ended May 31, 2022, partially offset by the patronage capital retirement of $58 million authorized by the CFC Board of Directors in July 2021.

Table 11.1: Equity
May 31,
(Dollars in thousands)20222021
Membership fees$970 $968 
Educational fund2,417 2,157 
Total membership fees and educational fund3,387 3,125 
Patronage capital allocated954,988 923,970 
Members’ capital reserve1,062,286 909,749 
Unallocated net income (loss):
Prior year-end cumulative derivative forward value losses(461,162)(1,079,739)
Current-year derivative forward value gains(1)
553,525 618,577 
Current year-end cumulative derivative forward value gains (losses)92,363 (461,162)
Other unallocated net loss(709)(709)
Unallocated net gain (loss)91,654 (461,871)
CFC retained equity2,112,315 1,374,973 
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)2,258 (25)
Total CFC equity2,114,573 1,374,948 
Noncontrolling interests27,396 24,931 
Total equity$2,141,969 $1,399,879 
____________________________
(1) Represents derivative forward value gains (losses) for CFC only, as total CFC equity does not include the noncontrolling interests of the consolidated variable interest entities NCSC and RTFC. See “Note 15—16—Business Segments” for the statements of operations for CFC.


Allocation of Net Earnings and Retirement of Patronage Capital—CFC

District of Columbia cooperative law requires cooperatives to allocate net earnings to patrons, to a general reserve in an amount sufficient to maintain a balance of at least 50% of paid-in capital and to a cooperative educational fund, as well as permits additional allocations to board-approved reserves. District of Columbia cooperative law also requires that a cooperative’s net earnings be allocated to all patrons in proportion to their individual patronage and each patron’s allocation be distributed to the patron unless the patron agrees that the cooperative may retain its share as additional capital.

Annually, the CFC Board of Directors allocates its net earnings to its patrons in the form of patronage capital, to a cooperative educational fund, to a general reserve, if necessary, and to board-approved reserves. An allocation to the general reserve is made, if necessary, to maintain the balance of the general reserve at 50% of the membership fees collected.collected. The general reserve is included in the patronage capital allocated component of CFC’s retained equity. CFC’s bylaws require the allocation to the cooperative educational fund to be at least 0.25% of its net earnings. Funds from the cooperativecooperative educational fund are disbursed annually to statewide cooperative organizations to fund the teaching of cooperative principles and for other cooperative education programs.




139

NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Currently, CFC has one1 additional board-approved reserve, the members’ capital reserve. The CFC Board of Directors determines the amount of net earnings that is allocated to the members’ capital reserve, if any. The members’ capital reserve represents net earnings that CFC holds to increase equity retention. The net earnings held in the members’ capital reserve have not been specifically allocated to members, but may be allocated to individual members in the future as patronage capital if authorized by the CFC Board of Directors.


All remaining net earnings are allocated to CFC’s members in the form of patronage capital. The amount of net earnings allocated to each member is based on the member’s patronage of CFC’s lending programs during the year. No interest is earned by members on allocated patronage capital. There is no effect on CFC’s total equity as a result of allocating net earnings to members in the form of patronage capital or to board-approved reserves. The CFC Board of Directors has voted annually to retire a portion of the patronage capital allocation. Upon retirement, patronage capital is paid out in cash to the members to whom it was allocated. CFC’s total equity is reduced by the amount of patronage capital retired to its members




NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





and by amounts disbursed from board-approved reserves. NetCFC’s net earnings arefor determining allocations is based on CFC’s non-GAAP adjusted net income, which excludes the impact of derivative forward value gains (losses).and losses.


The current policy of the CFC Board of Directors is to retire 50% of the prior year’s allocated patronage capital and hold the remaining 50% for 25 years. The retirement amount and timing remainsis subject to annual approval by the CFC Board of Directors.


In July 2019,May 2022, the CFC Board of Directors authorized the allocation of the$1 million of net earnings for fiscal year 20192022 to the cooperative educational fund. In July 2022, the CFC Board of Directors authorized the allocation of net earnings for fiscal year 2022 as follows: $97$89 million to members in the form of patronage $71capital and $153 million to the members’ capital reserve and $1 million toreserve. The amount of patronage capital allocated each year by CFC’s Board of Directors is based on adjusted net income, which excludes the cooperative educational fund. impact of derivative forward value gains (losses). See “Item 7. MD&A—Non-GAAP Financial Measures” for information on adjusted net income.

In July 2019,2022, the CFC Board of Directors also authorized the retirement of allocated net earnings totaling $63$59 million, consisting of $48which $44 million which represented 50% of the patronage capital allocation for fiscal year 2019,2022 and $15$15 million which represented the portion of the allocation from net earnings for fiscal year 1994 net earnings1997 that has been held for 25 years pursuant to the CFC Board of DirectorsDirectors’ policy. We expect to return thisthe authorized patronage capital retirement amount of $59 million to members in cash in the firstsecond quarter of fiscal year 2020. 2023. The remaining portion of the patronage capital allocation for fiscal year 2022 will be retained by CFC for 25 years pursuant to the guidelines adopted by the CFC Board of Directors in June 2009.

In May 2021, the CFC Board of Directors authorized the allocation of $1 million of net earnings for fiscal year 2021 to the cooperative educational fund. In July 2021 the CFC Board of Directors authorized the allocation of net earnings for fiscal year 2021 as follows: $90 million to members in the form of patronage capital and $102 million to the members’ capital reserve. In July 2021, the CFC Board of Directors also authorized the retirement of allocated net earnings totaling $58 million, of which $45 million represented 50% of the patronage capital allocation for fiscal year 2021 and $13 million represented the portion of the allocation from net earnings for fiscal year 1996 that has been held for 25 years pursuant to the CFC Board of Directors’ policy. The authorized patronage capital retirement amount of $58 million was returned to members in cash in September 2021. The remaining portion of the amount allocated for fiscal year 2021 will be retained by CFC for 25 years under current guidelines adopted by the CFC Board of Directors in June 2009.

Future allocations and retirements of net earnings may be made annually as determined by the CFC Board of Directors with due regard for its financial condition. The CFC Board of Directors has the authority to change the current practice for allocating and retiring net earnings at any time, subject to applicable laws and regulations.


In July 2018, the CFC Board of Directors authorized the allocation of the fiscal year 2018 net earnings as follows: $95 million to members in the form of patronage capital, $57 million to the members’ capital reserve and $1 million to the cooperative educational fund.

In July 2018, the CFC Board of Directors authorized the retirement of patronage capital totaling $48 million, which represented 50% of the fiscal year 2018 allocation of patronage capital of $95 million. We returned the $48 million to members in cash in August 2018. The remaining portion of the allocated amount will be retained by CFC for 25 years under guidelines adopted by the CFC Board of Directors in June 2009.

TotalCFC’s total equity includes noncontrolling interest,interests, which representsconsist of 100% of the equity of NCSC and RTFC, equity, as the members of NCSC and RTFC own or control 100% of the interestinterests in their respective companies. NCSC and RTFC also allocate annual net earnings, subject to approval by the board of directors for each company. The allocation of net earnings by NCSC and RTFC to members or board-approved reserves does not affect noncontrolling interests; however, the cash


140

NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

retirement of amounts allocated to members or to disbursements from board-approved reserves results in a reduction to noncontrolling interests.

Allocation of Net Earnings and Retirement of Patronage Capital—RTFC

In accordance with District of Columbia cooperative law and its bylaws and board policies, RTFC allocates its net earnings to its patrons, to a cooperative educational fund and to a general reserve, if necessary. RTFC’s bylaws require that it allocate at least 1% of net income to a cooperative educational fund. Funds from the cooperative educational fund are disbursed annually to fund the teaching of cooperative principles and for other cooperative education programs. An allocation to the general reserve is made, if necessary, to maintain the balance of the general reserve at 50% of the membership fees collected. The remainder is allocated to borrowers in proportion to their patronage. RTFC retires at least 20% of its annual allocation, if any, to members in cash prior to filing the applicable tax return. Any additional amounts are retired as determined by the RTFC Board of Directors, taking into consideration RTFC’s financial condition.


Allocation of Net Earnings—NCSC

NCSC’s bylaws require that it allocate at least 0.25% of its net earnings to a cooperative educational fund and an amount to the general reserve required to maintain the general reserve balance at 50% of membership fees collected. Funds from the cooperative educational fund are disbursed annually to fund the teaching of cooperative principles and for other cooperative education programs.

The NCSC Board of Directors has the authority to determine if and when net earnings will be allocated. There is no effect on noncontrolling interest as a result of NCSC and RTFC allocating net earnings to members or board-approved reserves. There is a reduction to noncontrolling interest as a result of the cash retirement of amounts allocated to members or to disbursements from board-approved reserves.


Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)


The following tables summarize,table presents, by component, the activitychanges in AOCI as of and for the years ended May 31, 20192022 and 2018.2021 and the balance of each component as of the end of each respective period.

Table 11.2: Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Year Ended May 31,
 20222021
(Dollars in thousands)
Unrealized Gains on Derivative Hedges(1)
Unrealized Losses on Defined Benefit Plans (2)
Total
Unrealized Gains on Derivative Hedges(1)
Unrealized Losses on Defined Benefit Plans (2)
Total
Beginning balance$1,718 $(1,743)$(25)$2,130 $(4,040)$(1,910)
Changes in unrealized gains (losses)4,028 (1,409)2,619 — 1,545 1,545 
Realized (gains) losses reclassified into earnings(623)287 (336)(412)752 340 
Ending balance$5,123 $(2,865)$2,258 $1,718 $(1,743)$(25)
____________________________
(1) Of the derivative gains reclassified to earnings, a portion is reclassified as a component of the derivative gains (losses) line item and the remainder is reclassified as a component of the interest expense line item on our consolidated statements of operations.
(2) Reclassified to earnings as a component of the other non-interest expense line item presented on our consolidated statements of operations.

We expect to reclassify realized gains of $1 million attributable to derivative cash flow hedges from AOCI into earnings over the next 12 months.





141


NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS






  Year Ended May 31, 2019
(Dollars in thousands) 
Unrealized Gains (Losses)
Equity Securities
 Unrealized Gains
Derivatives
 Unrealized Gains (Losses) Cash Flow Hedges Unrealized Losses Defined Benefit Plan Total
Beginning balance $8,794
 $3,039
 $(1,059) $(2,230) $8,544
Cumulative effect of changes from adoption of new accounting standards (8,794) 
 
 
 (8,794)
Unrealized gains 
 
 1,059
 
 1,059
Gains reclassified into earnings 
 (468) 
 (488) (956)
Other comprehensive income (loss) 
 (468) 1,059
 (488) 103
Ending balance $
 $2,571
 $
 $(2,718) $(147)
  Year Ended May 31, 2018
(Dollars in thousands) 
Unrealized Gains (Losses)
Equity Securities
 
Unrealized Gains
Derivatives
 Unrealized Gains Cash Flow Hedge Unrealized Losses Defined Benefit Plan Total
Beginning balance $12,016
 $3,531
 $171
 $(2,543) $13,175
Unrealized losses (3,222) 
 (1,059) (194) (4,475)
(Gains) losses reclassified into earnings 
 (492) (171) 507
 (156)
Other comprehensive income (loss) (3,222) (492) (1,230) 313
 (4,631)
Ending balance $8,794
 $3,039
 $(1,059) $(2,230) $8,544

We expect to reclassify less than $1 million of amounts in AOCI related to unrealized derivative gains into earnings over the next 12 months.
NOTE 12—EMPLOYEE BENEFITS


National Rural Electric Cooperative Association (“NRECA”) Retirement Security Plan


CFC is a participant in the NRECA Retirement Security Plan (“the Retirement Security Plan”), a multiple-employer defined benefit pension plan. The employer identification number of the Retirement Security Plan is 53-0116145, and the plan number is 333. Plan information is available publicly through the annual Form 5500, including attachments. The Retirement Security Plan is a qualified plan in which all employees are eligible to participate upon completion of one year of service. Under this plan, participating employees are entitled to receive annually, under a 50% joint and surviving spouse annuity, 1.70% of the average of their five5 highest base salaries during their participation in the plan, multiplied by the number of years of participation in the plan.


The risks of participating in the multiple-employer plan are different from the risks of single-employer plans due to the following characteristics of the plan:


Assets contributed to the multiple-employer plan by one participating employer may be used to provide benefits to employees of other participating employers.
If a participating employer stops contributing to the plan, the unfunded obligations of the plan may be borne by the remaining participating employers.
If CFC chooses to stop participating in the plan, CFC may be required to pay a withdrawal liability representing an amount based on the underfunded status of the Plan.plan.





NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





Because of the current funding status of the Retirement Security Plan, it is not subject to a certified zone status determination under the Pension Protection Act of 2006.2006 (“PPA”). Based on the Pension Protection Act (“PPA”) fundingPPA target and PPA actuarial value of the planplan assets, it was more than 80% funded as of January 1, 2019, 20182022, 2021 and 2017.2020. We made contributions to the Retirement Security Plan of $5 million, $5$4 million and $4$5 million in fiscal year 2019, 2018years 2022, 2021 and 2017,2020, respectively. In each of these years, our contribution represented less than 5% of total contributions made to the plan by all participating employers. Our contribution did not include a surcharge. CFC’s expense is limited to the annual premium to participate in the Retirement Security Plan. Because it is a multiple-employer plan, there is no funding liability for CFC for the plan. There were no funding improvement plans, rehabilitation plans implemented or pending, and no required minimum contributions. There are no collective bargaining agreements in place that cover CFC’s employees.


Pension Restoration Plan


The Pension Restoration Plan (“PRP”) is a nonqualified defined benefit plan established to provide supplemental benefits to certain eligible employees whose compensation exceeds the IRSInternal Revenue Service (“IRS”) limits for the qualified Retirement Security Plan. The PRP restores the value of the Retirement Security Plan for eligibleeligible officers to the level it would be if the IRS limits on annual pay and annual annuity benefits were not in place. The limit was $280,000$305,000 for calendar year 2019.2022. The PRP, which is administered by NRECA, was frozen as of December 31, 2014.


The benefit and payout formula under the nonqualified PRP component of the Retirement Security Plan is similar to that under the qualified plan component. Under the PRP, the amount NRECA invoices us for the Retirement Security Plan is based on the full compensation paid to each covered employee. Upon retirement of an employee covered under the PRP, NRECA will calculate the retirement benefits to be paid both with and without consideration of the IRS compensation limits. We will then pay the nonqualified supplemental benefit to the covered employee. NRECA will provide a credit for supplemental benefit payments made by us to covered employees against future contributions we are required to make to the Retirement Security Plan.


The threeThere was 1 executive officer participating executive officers havein this plan in fiscal year 2022, which satisfied the provisions established to receive the benefit from this plan. Sinceplan and as such there iswas no longer a risk of forfeiture of the benefit under the PRP, wePRP. We will make


142

NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

distributions of any earned benefit from the plan to each of the executive officersofficer included in the plan and the distributions will be credited back to us by NRECA. Accordingly,Accordingly, the distributions have no impact on our consolidated financial statements.


Executive Benefit Restoration Plan


NRECA restricted additional participation in the PRP in December 2014. We therefore adopted a supplemental top-hat Executive Benefit Restoration (“EBR”) Plan, effective January 1, 2015. The EBR Plan is a nonqualified, unfunded plan maintained by CFC to provide retirement benefits to a select group of executive officers whose compensation exceeds IRS limits for qualified defined benefit plans. There is a risk of forfeiture if participants leave the company prior to becoming fully vested in the EBR Plan. There were eightThis plan included 3 and 5 participants as of May 31, 2019. 2022 and 2021, respectively.

We recognized net periodic pension expense for this plan of approximately $1 million, $2 million and $2 million in fiscal years 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. The unfunded projected benefit obligation of this plan, which is included on our consolidated balance sheets as a component of other liabilities, was $6$5 million as of both May 31, 2022 and 2021. CFC made contributions to the plan of $2 million, $1 million and $4$2 million in fiscal years 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively, for lump-sum settlement payments to fully vested participants of $2 million, $1 million and $2 million in each respective year. Unrecognized pension costs recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income increased to $3 million as of May 31, 2022, from $2 million as of May 31, 20192021, largely due to the increase in the projected benefit obligation. We expect to amortize less than $1 million of the unrecognized pension costs as a component of our net periodic pension benefit expense in fiscal year 2023.

As a result of the settlement payments in fiscal years 2022, 2021 and 2018, respectively. We2020, we recognized pension expense for this plana settlement loss of approximativelyless than $1 million in eachfiscal year 2022, a combined settlement and curtailment loss of approximately $1 million in fiscal years 2019, 2018year 2021 and 2017.a settlement loss of approximately $1 million in fiscal year 2020. The curtailment and settlements losses are recorded as a component of non-interest expense on our consolidated statements of operations.


Defined Contribution Plan


CFC offers a 401(k) defined contribution savings program, the 401(k) Pension Plan, to all employees who have completed a minimum of 1,000 hours of service in either the first 12 consecutive months or first full calendar year of employment. We contribute an amount up to 2% of an employee’s salary each year for all employees participating in the program with a minimum 2% employee contribution. We contributed approximativelyapproximately $1 million to the plan in each of fiscal years 2019, 20182022, 2021 and 2017.

2020.



NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





NOTE 13—GUARANTEES


We guarantee certain contractual obligations of our members so they may obtain various forms of financing. We use the same credit policies and monitoring procedures in providing guarantees as we do for loans and commitments. If a member system defaults on its obligation to pay debt service, then we are obligated to pay any required amounts under our guarantees. Meeting our guarantee obligations satisfies the underlying obligation of our member systems and prevents the exercise of remedies by the guarantee beneficiary based upon a payment default by a member system. In general, the member system is required to repay any amount advanced by us with interest, pursuant to the documents evidencing the member system’s reimbursement obligation.


The following table summarizes total guarantees,displays the notional amount of our outstanding guarantee obligations, by guarantee type of guarantee and by member class, as of May 31, 20192022 and 2018.2021.



143

NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

  May 31,
(Dollars in thousands) 2019 2018
Total by type:    
Long-term tax-exempt bonds(1)
 $312,190
 $316,985
Letters of credit(2)
 379,001
 343,970
Other guarantees 146,244
 144,206
Total $837,435
 $805,161
     
Total by member class:    
CFC:    
Distribution $235,919
 $201,993
Power supply 586,717
 587,837
Statewide and associate 3,481
 3,326
CFC total 826,117
 793,156
NCSC 8,714
 10,431
RTFC 2,604
 1,574
Total $837,435
 $805,161
Table 13.1: Guarantees Outstanding by Type and Member Class
____________________________
May 31,
(Dollars in thousands)20222021
Guarantee type:  
Long-term tax-exempt bonds(1)
$122,150 $145,025 
Letters of credit(2)
450,354 389,735 
Other guarantees158,279 154,320 
Total$730,783 $689,080 
Member class:  
CFC:  
Distribution$314,925 $251,023 
Power supply378,516 415,984 
Statewide and associate(3)
13,372 5,523 
CFC total706,813 672,530 
NCSC23,970 16,550 
Total$730,783 $689,080 
____________________________
(1)Represents the outstanding principal amount of long-term fixed-rate and variable-rate guaranteed bonds.
(2)Reflects our maximum potential exposure for letters of credit.

(3)Includes CFC guarantees to NCSC and RTFC members totaling $11 million and $3 million as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

We guarantee debt issued in connection with the construction or acquisition of pollution control, solid waste disposal, industrial development and electric distribution facilities, classified as long-term tax-exempt bonds in the table above. We unconditionally guarantee to the holders or to trustees for the benefit of holders of these bonds the full principal, interest, and in most cases, premium, if any, on each bond when due. If a member system defaults in its obligation to pay debt service, then we are obligated to pay any required amounts under our guarantees. Such payment will prevent the occurrence of an event of default that would otherwise permit acceleration of the bond issue. In general, the member system is required to repay any amount advanced by us with interest, pursuant to the documents evidencing the member system’s reimbursement obligation.


Long-term tax-exempt bonds of $312$122 million and $317$145 million as of May 31, 20192022 and 2018,2021, respectively, included $247 million and $250 million, respectively,consist of adjustable or variable-rate bonds that may be converted to a fixed rate as specified in the applicable indenture for each bond offering. We are unable to determine the maximum amount of interest that we may be required to pay related to the remaining adjustable and variable-rate bonds. Many of these bonds have a call provision that allows us to call the bond in the event of a default, which would limit our exposure to future interest payments on these bonds. Our maximum potential exposure generally is secured by mortgage liens on the members’ assets and future revenue.




NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





If a member’s debt is accelerated because of a determination that the interest thereon is not tax-exempt, the member’s obligation to reimburse us for any guarantee payments will be treated asas a long-term loan. The remaining long-term tax-exempt bonds of $65 million as of May 31, 2019 are fixed-rate. The maximum potential exposure for these bonds, including the outstanding principal of $65 million and related interest through maturity, totaled $91 million as of May 31, 2019. The maturities for long-term tax-exempt bonds and the related guarantees extend through calendar year 2042. 2037.


Of the outstanding letters of credit of $379$450 million and $344$390 million as of May 31, 20192022 and 2018,2021, respectively, $126$118 million and $120$104 million, respectively, were secured. We did not have any letters of credit outstanding that provided for standby liquidity for adjustable and floating-rate tax-exempt bonds issued for the benefit of our members as of May 31, 2019. The maturities for the outstanding letters of credit as of May 31, 20192022 extend through calendar year 2038.calendar year 2040. In March 2021, subsequent to Brazos’ bankruptcy filing, we had draws totaling $3 million on the letters of credit for Brazos. With the exception of Brazos, we were not required to perform pursuant to any of our guarantee obligations during fiscal years 2022 or 2021.


In addition to the letters of credit listed in the table above, under master letter of credit facilities in place as of May 31, 2019,2022, we may be required to issue up to an additional $53$95 million in letters of credit to third parties for the benefit of our members. All of our master letter of credit facilities were subject to material adverse change clauses at the time of issuance as of May 31, 2019.2022. Prior to issuing a letter of credit, we would confirm that there has been no material adverse change in the business or condition, financial or otherwise, of the borrower since the time the loan was approved and confirm that the borrower is currently in compliance with the letter of credit terms and conditions.



144

NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The maximum potential exposure for other guarantees was $147$158 million and $145$154 million as of May 31, 20192022 and 2018,2021, respectively, all of which were unsecured.$25 million was secured as of both May 31, 2022 and 2021. The maturities for these other guarantees listed in the table above extend through calendar year 2025.

Guarantees Guarantees under which our right of recovery from our members was not secured totaled $374$466 million and $344$415 million and represented 45%64% and 43%60% of total guarantees as of May 31, 20192022 and 2018,2021, respectively.


In addition to the guarantees described above, we were also the liquidity provider for $247$122 million of variable-rate tax-exempt bonds as of May 31, 2019,2022, issued for our member cooperatives. While the bonds are in variable-rate mode, in return for a fee, we have unconditionally agreed to purchase bonds tendered or put for redemption if the remarketing agents are unable to sell such bonds to other investors. We were not required to perform as liquidity provider pursuant to these obligations during fiscal years 2019, 20182022, 2021 or 2017.2020.


Guarantee Liability


As of May 31, 2019 and 2018, weWe recorded a total guarantee liability of $14 millionfor noncontingent and $11 million, respectively, which represents the contingent and noncontingent exposures related to guarantees and liquidity obligations. The contingent guarantee liability was $1 million as of both May 31, 2019 and 2018, based on management’s estimate of exposure to losses within the guarantee portfolio. The remaining balance of the total guarantee liabilityobligations of $13 million and $10 million as of May 31, 20192022 and 2018, respectively, relates2021, respectively. The noncontingent guarantee liability, which pertains to our noncontingent obligation to stand ready to perform over the term of our guarantees and liquidity obligations that we have entered into or modified since January 1, 2003.2003, and accounts for the substantial majority of our guarantee liability, totaled $12 million and $9 million as of May 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The remaining amount pertains to our contingent guarantee exposures.


The following table details the scheduled maturities of our outstanding guarantees in each of the five fiscal years following May 31, 20192022 and thereafter:



Table 13.2: Guarantees Outstanding Maturities

(Dollars in thousands)Amount
Maturing
2023$238,694 
202460,860 
202554,766 
2026157,448 
202719,605 
Thereafter199,410 
Total$730,783 


NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





(Dollars in thousands) 
Amount
Maturing
2020 $246,143
2021 133,015
2022 30,882
2023 159,059
2024 31,162
Thereafter 237,174
Total $837,435
NOTE 14—FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT


We useFair value, also referred to as an exit price, is defined as the price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. The fair value measurementsaccounting guidance provides a three-level fair value hierarchy for classifying financial instruments. This hierarchy is based on the initial recordingmarkets in which the assets or liabilities trade and whether the inputs to the valuation techniques used to measure fair value are observable or unobservable. The fair value measurement of certain assetsa financial asset or liability is assigned a level based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The levels, in priority order based on the extent to which observable inputs are available to measure fair value, are Level 1, Level 2 and liabilities and periodic remeasurement of certain assets and liabilities on a recurring or nonrecurring basis.Level 3. The accounting guidance for fair value measurements requires that we maximize the use of observable inputs and disclosures establishes a three-level fair value hierarchy that prioritizesminimize the use of unobservable inputs into the valuation techniques used to measurein determining fair value. The levels of the fair value hierarchy, in priority order, include Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3. We describe the valuation technique for each level in “Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.”



145





NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The following tables presenttable presents the carrying value and estimated fair value forof all of our financial instruments, including those carried at amortized cost, as of May 31, 20192022 and 2018.2021. The tablestable also displaydisplays the classification level within the fair value hierarchy based on the degree of observability of the inputs used in the valuation technique used infor estimating fair value.
  May 31, 2019 Fair Value Measurement Level
(Dollars in thousands) Carrying Value Fair Value Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Assets:          
Cash and cash equivalents $177,922
 $177,922
 $177,922
 $
 $
Restricted cash 8,282
 8,282
 8,282
 
 
Equity securities 87,533
 87,533
 87,533
 
 
Debt securities held-to-maturity 565,444
 570,549
 
 570,549
 
Deferred compensation investments 4,984
 4,984
 4,984
 
 
Loans to members, net 25,899,369
 25,743,503
 
 
 25,743,503
Accrued interest receivable 133,605
 133,605
 
 133,605
 
Debt service reserve funds 17,151
 17,151
 17,151
 
 
Derivative assets 41,179
 41,179
 
 41,179
 
           
Liabilities:          
Short-term borrowings $3,607,726
 $3,608,259
 $
 $3,608,259
 $
Long-term debt 19,210,793
 20,147,183
 
 11,482,715
 8,664,468
Accrued interest payable 158,997
 158,997
 
 158,997
 
Guarantee liability 13,666
 13,307
 
 
 13,307
Derivative liabilities 391,724
 391,724
 
 391,724
 
Subordinated deferrable debt 986,020
 1,004,707
 
 1,004,707
 
Members’ subordinated certificates 1,357,129
 1,357,129
 
 
 1,357,129

Table 14.1: Fair Value of Financial Instruments
 May 31, 2022Fair Value Measurement Level
(Dollars in thousands)Carrying ValueFair ValueLevel 1Level 2Level 3
Assets:    
Cash and cash equivalents$153,551 $153,551 $153,551 $ $ 
Restricted cash7,563 7,563 7,563   
Equity securities, at fair value33,758 33,758 33,758   
Debt securities trading, at fair value566,146 566,146  566,146  
Deferred compensation investments6,710 6,710 6,710   
Loans to members, net29,995,826 28,595,111   28,595,111 
Accrued interest receivable111,418 111,418  111,418  
Derivative assets222,042 222,042  222,042  
Total financial assets$31,097,014 $29,696,299 $201,582 $899,606 $28,595,111 
Liabilities:  
Short-term borrowings$4,981,167 $4,978,580 $ $4,978,580 $ 
Long-term debt21,545,440 21,106,750  12,248,695 8,858,055 
Accrued interest payable131,950 131,950  131,950  
Guarantee liability12,764 13,083   13,083 
Derivative liabilities128,282 128,282  128,282  
Subordinated deferrable debt986,518 960,869 250,800 710,069  
Members’ subordinated certificates1,234,161 1,234,161   1,234,161 
Total financial liabilities$29,020,282 $28,553,675 $250,800 $18,197,576 $10,105,299 





146






NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


May 31, 2021Fair Value Measurement Level
(Dollars in thousands)Carrying ValueFair ValueLevel 1Level 2Level 3
Assets:    
Cash and cash equivalents$295,063 $295,063 $295,063 $— $— 
Restricted cash8,298 8,298 8,298 — — 
Equity securities, at fair value35,102 35,102 35,102 — — 
Debt securities trading, at fair value576,175 576,175 — 576,175 — 
Deferred compensation investments7,222 7,222 7,222 — — 
Loans to members, net28,341,429 29,967,692 — — 29,967,692 
Accrued interest receivable107,856 107,856 — 107,856 — 
Derivative assets121,259 121,259 — 121,259 — 
Total financial assets$29,492,404 $31,118,667 $345,685 $805,290 $29,967,692 
Liabilities:  
Short-term borrowings$4,582,096 $4,582,329 $— $4,582,329 $— 
Long-term debt20,603,123 21,799,736 — 12,476,073 9,323,663 
Accrued interest payable123,672 123,672 — 123,672 — 
Guarantee liability10,041 10,841 — — 10,841 
Derivative liabilities584,989 584,989 — 584,989 — 
Subordinated deferrable debt986,315 1,062,748 265,200 797,548 — 
Members’ subordinated certificates1,254,660 1,254,660 — — 1,254,660 
Total financial liabilities$28,144,896 $29,418,975 $265,200 $18,564,611 $10,589,164 



  May 31, 2018 Fair Value Measurement Level
(Dollars in thousands) Carrying Value Fair Value Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Assets:          
Cash and cash equivalents $230,999
 $230,999
 $230,999
 $
 $
Restricted cash 7,825
 7,825
 7,825
 
 
Time deposits 100,000
 100,000
 
 100,000
 
Equity securities 89,332
 89,332
 89,332
 
 
Debt securities held-to-maturity 520,519
 516,546
   516,546
  
Deferred compensation investments 5,194
 5,194
 5,194
 
 
Loans to members, net 25,159,807
 24,167,886
 
 
 24,167,886
Accrued interest receivable 127,442
 127,442
 
 127,442
 
Debt service reserve funds 17,151
 17,151
 17,151
 
 
Derivative assets 244,526
 244,526
 
 244,526
 
           
Liabilities:          
Short-term borrowings $3,795,910
 $3,795,799
 $
 $3,695,799
 $100,000
Long-term debt 18,714,960
 18,909,276
 
 11,373,216
 7,536,060
Accrued interest payable 149,284
 149,284
 
 149,284
 
Guarantee liability 10,589
 10,454
 
 
 10,454
Derivative liabilities 275,932
 275,932
 
 275,932
 
Subordinated deferrable debt 742,410
 766,088
 
 766,088
 
Members’ subordinated certificates 1,379,982
 1,380,004
 
 
 1,380,004

On June 1, 2018, we adopted the accounting guidance on the overall recognition and measurement of financial assets and financial liabilities. This guidance eliminated the requirement to disclose the methods and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value of financial instruments that are measured at amortized cost on the consolidated balance sheet, except for loans receivable where the fair value is not based on exit price. The guidance did not, however, eliminate the requirement to describe the valuation techniques used in estimating the fair value of financial instruments recorded at fair value on a recurring basis.


Loans to Members, Net


Because of the interest rate repricing options we provide to borrowers on loan advances and other characteristics of our loans, there is no ready market from which to obtain fair value quotes or observable inputs for similar loans. As a result, we are unable to use the exit price to estimate the fair value of loans to members. We therefore estimate fair value for fixed-rate loans by discounting the expected future cash flows based on the current rate at which we would make a similar new loan for the same remaining maturity to a borrower. The assumed maturity date used in estimating the fair value of loans with a fixed rate for a selected rate term is the next repricing date because at the repricing date, the loan will reprice at the current market rate. The carrying value of our variable-rate loans adjusted for credit risk approximates fair value since variable-rate loans are eligible to be reset at least monthly.


The fair value of loans with different risk characteristics, specifically nonperforming and restructured loans, is estimated using collateral valuations or by adjusting cash flows for credit risk and discounting those cash flows using the current rates at which similar loans would be made by us to borrowers for the same remaining maturities. The fair value of loans held for sale is determined based on the cost, which approximates the fair value, as we sell these loans at par value, concurrently or within a short period of time with the closing of the loan or participation agreement. See below for information on how we estimate the fair value of certain impairedindividually evaluated loans.

Transfers Between Levels

We monitor the availability of observable market data to assess the appropriate classification of financial instruments within the fair value hierarchy and transfer between Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3 accordingly. Observable market data includes but





147






NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


is not limited to quoted prices and market transactions. Changes in economic conditions or market liquidity generally will drive changes in availability of observable market data. Changes in availability of observable market data, which also may result in changes in the valuation technique used, are generally the cause of transfers between levels. We did not have any transfers into or out of Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy during the fiscal years ended May 31, 2022 and 2021.




RecurringAssets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value Measurementson a Recurring Basis


The following table presents the carrying value and fair value of financial instruments reported in our consolidated financial statements at fair value on a recurring basis as of May 31, 20192022 and 20182021, and the classification of the valuation technique within the fair value hierarchy. We did not have any assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs during the years ended May 31, 2022 and 2021.

  May 31,
  2019 2018
(Dollars in thousands) Level 1 Level 2 Total Level 1 Level 2 Total
Equity securities $87,533
 $
 $87,533
 $89,332
 $
 $89,332
Deferred compensation investments 4,984
 
 4,984
 5,194
 
 5,194
Derivative assets 
 41,179
 41,179
 
 244,526
 244,526
Derivative liabilities 
 391,724
 391,724
 
 275,932
 275,932
Table 14.2: Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

May 31,
 20222021
(Dollars in thousands)Level 1Level 2TotalLevel 1Level 2Total
Assets:
Equity securities, at fair value$33,758 $ $33,758 $35,102 $— $35,102 
Debt securities trading, at fair value— 566,146 566,146 — 576,175 576,175 
Deferred compensation investments6,710  6,710 7,222 — 7,222 
Derivative assets 222,042 222,042 — 121,259 121,259 
Liabilities:
Derivative liabilities 128,282 128,282 — 584,989 584,989 

Below is a description of the valuation techniques we use to estimate fair value of our financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on a recurring basis, the significant inputs used in those techniques, if applicable, and the classification within the fair value hierarchy.


Equity Securities


Our investments in equity securities consist of investments in Farmer Mac Class A common stock and Series A, Series B and Series C preferred stock. These securities are reported at fair value in our consolidated balance sheets. We determine the fair value based on quoted prices on the stock exchange where the stock is traded. That stock exchange with respect to Farmer Mac Class A common stock is an active market based on the volume of shares transacted. Fair valuesBecause quoted market prices are the key input in deriving fair value for these securities, arethe valuation methodology is classified withinas Level 11.

Debt Securities Trading

As discussed above in “Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” our debt securities consist of investments in certificates of deposit with maturities greater than 90 days, commercial paper, corporate debt securities, municipality debt securities, commercial MBS, foreign government debt securities and other ABS and were classified as trading as of May 31, 2022. Management estimates the fair value hierarchy.of our debt securities utilizing the assistance of third-party pricing services. Methodologies employed, controls relied upon and inputs used by third-party pricing vendors are subject to management review when such services are provided. This review may consist of, in part, obtaining and evaluating control reports issued and pricing methodology materials distributed. We review the pricing methodologies provided by the vendors in order to determine if observable market information is being used to determine the fair value versus unobservable inputs. Investment securities traded in secondary markets are typically valued using unadjusted vendor prices. These investment securities, which include those measured using unadjusted vendor prices, are generally classified as Level 2 because the valuation


148





NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
typically involves using quoted market prices for similar securities, pricing models, discounted cash flow analyses using significant observable market where available or a combination of multiple valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market.

Deferred Compensation Investments


CFC offers a nonqualified 457(b) deferred compensation plan to highly compensated employees.employees and board members. Such amounts deferred by employees are invested by the company. The deferred compensation investments are presented as other assets in the consolidated balance sheets in the other assets category at fair value. We calculate fair value based on the daily published and quoted net asset value and these investmentsvalue. Because quoted market prices are classified within Level 1 of the key input in deriving fair value hierarchy.for this plan, the valuation methodology is classified as Level 1.


Derivative Instruments


Our derivatives primarily consist of over-the-counter interest rate swaps. All of our swap agreements are subject to master netting agreements. There is not an active secondary market for the types ofOTC interest rate swaps we use.executed under master netting swap agreements that do not have readily available quoted market prices. We determinederive the fair value of our derivatives using our internal industry-standard discounted cash flow models that incorporatecombined with a supplemental vendor-based model. We rely primarily on market observable inputs for these models, including, market interest rates and forward swap yield curves, as well as the contractual terms of the derivative instrument, as of the valuation date. We include a credit risk valuation adjustment in our valuation of derivatives, which takes into consideration the effect of nonperformance credit risk of the counterparty or our own nonperformance risk and depends on whether the derivative instrument is in a gain, or asset, financial position or in a loss, or liability, financial position. We corroborate our derivative valuations by comparing the amounts to counterparty valuations and third-party pricing sources. We analyze and validate pricing variances, if material, among different external pricing sources. Because observable market data serves as the key inputs such as spot LIBOR rates, Eurodollar futures contracts and market swap rates. These inputs can vary depending on the type of derivative and nature of the underlying rate, price or index upon which the derivative’s value is based. The impact of counterparty nonperformance risk is considered when measuring the fair value of derivative assets. Internal pricing is compared against additional pricing sources, such as external valuation agents and other sources. Pricing variances among different pricing sources are analyzed and validated. The technique for determining the fair value forin valuing our interest rate swaps, the valuation methodology is classified as Level 2.


Transfers Between Levels

We monitor the availability of observable market data to assess the appropriate classification of financial instruments within the fair value hierarchyAssets and transfer between Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3 accordingly. Observable market data includes, but is not limited to, quoted prices and market transactions. Changes in economic conditions or market liquidity generally will drive changes in availability of observable market data. Changes in availability of observable market data, which also may




NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





result in changes in the valuation technique used, are generally the cause of transfers between levels. We did not have any transfers between levels for financial instruments measuredLiabilities Measured at fair valueFair Value on a recurring basis during the fiscal years ended May 31, 2019 and 2018.Nonrecurring Basis

Nonrecurring Fair Value Measurements


We may be required, from time to time, to measure certain assets and liabilities at fair value on a nonrecurring basis on our consolidated balance sheets. These assets and liabilities are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis but are subject to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances, such as in the application of lower of cost or fair value accounting or when we evaluate assets for impairment. AssetsWe had certain loans measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis during the fiscal year ended May 31, 2022 and still2021, which were repaid in full in November 2021.

Collateral-Dependent Loans

Because our loans are classified as held for investment and carried at amortized cost, we generally do not record loans at fair value on a recurring basis. However, we periodically record nonrecurring fair value adjustments for nonperforming collateral-dependent loans through the allowance for credit losses and provision for credit losses. We had no nonperforming collateral-dependent loans outstanding as of May 31, 2019 and 20182022. We had nonperforming collateral-dependent loans outstanding to 2 affiliated RTFC telecommunications borrowers totaling $9 million as of May 31, 2021, which were paid off in November 2021. The collateral underlying these loans consisted primarily of certain impaired loans. Fair value measurement adjustments for individually impaired loans are recorded inU.S. Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) wireless spectrum licenses. Our estimate of the provision for loan losses on our consolidated statements of operations. The fair value of these assets is determined based on the useloans was $6 million as of significant unobservable inputs, which are considered Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. We did not have any nonrecurring fair value measurement adjustments recorded in earnings attributable to these assets during fiscal years 2019, 2018 or 2017.May 31, 2021.


Significant Unobservable Level 3 Inputs

Impaired Loans


We utilizeemploy various approaches and techniques to estimate the fair value of loans where we expect repayment to be provided solely by the continued operation or sale of the underlying collateral, including estimated cash flows orfrom the collateral, underlying the loan to determine the fair value and specific allowance for impaired loans. The valuation technique used to determine fair value of the impaired loans provided by both our internal staff andvaluations obtained from third-party specialists includes market multiples (i.e.,and comparable companies).sales data. The significant unobservable inputs used intechnique depends on the determination of fair value for individually impaired loans is a multiple of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization based on various factors (i.e., financial condition of the borrower). In estimating the fair valuenature of the collateral we may use third-party valuation specialists, internal estimates or a combination of both. The significant unobservableand the extent to which observable inputs for estimating the fair value of impaired collateral-dependent loans are reviewed by ouravailable. Our Credit Risk Management group reviews the valuation technique, including the use of any significant inputs that are not readily observable by market participants, to assess the reasonableness of the assumptions used and the accuracy of the work performed. In cases where we rely on third-party inputs, we use the final unadjusted third-party valuation analysis as support for any adjustments to our consolidated financial statements and disclosures.

Because of the limited amount of impaired loans as of May 31, 2019 and 2018, we do not believe that potential changes in the significant unobservable inputs used in the determination of the fair value for impaired loans will have a material impact on the fair value measurement of these assets or our results of operations.


149

NOTE 15—BUSINESS SEGMENTS



Our consolidated financial statements include the financial results of CFC, NCSC and RTFC and certain entities created and controlled by CFC to hold foreclosed assets. Separate financial statements are produced for CFC, NCSC and RTFC and are the primary reports that management reviews in evaluating performance. The separate financial statements for CFC represent the consolidation of the financial results for CFC and the entities controlled by CFC. For more detail on the requirement to consolidate the financial results of NCSC and RTFC see “Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.”

The consolidated CFC financial statements include three operating segments: CFC, NCSC and RTFC. The NCSC and RTFC operating segments are not required to be separately reported as the financial results of NCSC and RTFC do not meet the quantitative thresholds outlined by the accounting standards for segment reporting as of May 31, 2019. As a result, we have elected to aggregate the NCSC and RTFC financial results into a combined “Other” segment. CFC is the primary source of funding to NCSC. CFC is the sole source of funding to RTFC. Pursuant to a guarantee agreement, CFC has agreed to indemnify NCSC and RTFC for loan losses. The loan loss allowance at NCSC and RTFC is offset by a guarantee receivable from CFC.





NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





appropriateness of the technique and the reasonableness of the assumptions involved. The following tables display segment results for the years ended May 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, and assets attributable to each segmentestimated fair value of $6 million as of May 31, 20192021 for the 2 affiliated RTFC nonperforming collateral-dependent loans totaling $9 million as of May 31, 2021 was derived primarily based on the lower end of limited publicly available sales data for the underlying FCC spectrum licenses collateral.

NOTE 15—VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES

NCSC and 2018.RTFC meet the definition of a VIE because they do not have sufficient equity investment at risk to finance their activities without financial support. CFC is the primary source of funding for NCSC and the sole source of funding for RTFC. Under the terms of management agreements with each company, CFC manages the business operations of NCSC and RTFC. CFC also unconditionally guarantees full indemnification for any loan losses of NCSC and RTFC pursuant to guarantee agreements with each company. CFC earns management and guarantee fees from its agreements with NCSC and RTFC.

All loans that require NCSC board approval also require CFC board approval. CFC is not a member of NCSC and does not elect directors to the NCSC board. If CFC becomes a member of NCSC, it would control the nomination process for 1 NCSC director. NCSC members elect directors to the NCSC board based on 1 vote for each member. NCSC is a Class C member of CFC. All loans that require RTFC board approval also require approval by CFC for funding under RTFC’s credit facilities with CFC. CFC is not a member of RTFC and does not elect directors to the RTFC board. RTFC is a non-voting associate of CFC. RTFC members elect directors to the RTFC board based on 1 vote for each member.

NCSC and RTFC creditors have no recourse against CFC in the event of a default by NCSC and RTFC, unless there is a guarantee agreement under which CFC has guaranteed NCSC or RTFC debt obligations to a third party. The following table provides information on incremental consolidated assets and liabilities of VIEs included in CFC’s consolidated financial statements, after intercompany eliminations, as of May 31, 2022 and 2021.

Table 15.1: Consolidated Assets and Liabilities of Variable Interest Entities
May 31,
(Dollars in thousands)20222021
Assets:
Loans outstanding$1,178,479 $1,127,251 
Other assets9,672 11,343 
Total assets$1,188,151 $1,138,594 
Liabilities:
Total liabilities$22,958 $30,187 

The following table provides information on CFC’s credit commitments to NCSC and RTFC, and potential exposure to loss under these commitments as of May 31, 2022 and 2021.



150

  Year Ended May 31, 2019
(Dollars in thousands) CFC Other Elimination Consolidated
Statement of operations:        
Interest income $1,126,869
 $51,741
 $(42,940) $1,135,670
Interest expense (835,491) (43,658) 42,940
 (836,209)
Net interest income 291,378
 8,083
 
 299,461
Benefit for loan losses 1,266
 
 
 1,266
Net interest income after benefit for loan losses 292,644
 8,083
 
 300,727
Non-interest income (loss):        
Fee and other income 20,515
 2,655
 (7,815) 15,355
Derivative losses:        
  Derivative cash settlements expense (42,618) (993) 
 (43,611)
  Derivative forward value losses (318,135) (1,595) 
 (319,730)
Derivative losses (360,753) (2,588) 
 (363,341)
Unrealized losses on equity securities (1,799) 
 
 (1,799)
Total non-interest income (loss) (342,037) 67
 (7,815) (349,785)
Non-interest expense:        
  General and administrative expenses (91,063) (8,477) 6,374
 (93,166)
  Losses on early extinguishment of debt (7,100) 
 
 (7,100)
  Other non-interest expense (1,675) (1,441) 1,441
 (1,675)
Total non-interest expense (99,838) (9,918) 7,815
 (101,941)
Loss before income taxes (149,231) (1,768) 
 (150,999)
Income tax expense 
 (211) 
 (211)
Net loss $(149,231) $(1,979) $
 $(151,210)
         
  May 31, 2019
  CFC Other Elimination Consolidated
Assets:        
Total loans outstanding $25,877,305
 $1,087,988
 $(1,059,629) $25,905,664
Deferred loan origination costs 11,240
 
 
 11,240
Less: Allowance for loan losses (17,535) 
 
 (17,535)
Loans to members, net 25,871,010
 1,087,988
 (1,059,629) 25,899,369
Other assets 1,214,045
 104,890
 (93,932) 1,225,003
Total assets $27,085,055
 $1,192,878
 $(1,153,561) $27,124,372








NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


Table 15.2: CFC Exposure Under Credit Commitments to NCSC and RTFC



May 31,
(Dollars in thousands)20222021
CFC credit commitments to NCSC and RTFC:
Total CFC credit commitments$5,500,000 $5,500,000 
Outstanding commitments:
Borrowings payable to CFC(1)
1,158,583 1,107,185 
 Credit enhancements:
CFC third-party guarantees23,970 16,550 
Other credit enhancements4,044 8,386 
Total credit enhancements(2)
28,014 24,936 
Total outstanding commitments1,186,597 1,132,121 
CFC credit commitments available(3)
$4,313,403 $4,367,879 

____________________________
(1) Intercompany borrowings payable by NCSC and RTFC to CFC are eliminated in consolidation.
(2) Excludes interest due on these instruments.
(3) Represents total CFC credit commitments less outstanding commitments as of each period-end.

Under a loan and security agreement with CFC, NCSC has access to a $1,500 million revolving line of credit and a $1,500 million revolving term loan from CFC, which mature in 2067. Under a loan and security agreement with CFC, RTFC has access to a $1,000 million revolving line of credit and a $1,500 million revolving term loan from CFC, which mature in 2067. CFC loans to NCSC and RTFC are secured by all assets and revenue of NCSC and RTFC. CFC’s maximum potential exposure, including interest due, for the credit enhancements totaled $28 million. The maturities for obligations guaranteed by CFC extend through 2031.

NOTE 16—BUSINESS SEGMENTS

Our activities are conducted through 3 operating segments, which are based on each of the legal entities included in our consolidated financial statements: CFC, NCSC and RTFC. We report segment information for CFC separately; however, we aggregate segment information for NCSC and RTFC into one reportable segment because neither entity meets the quantitative materiality threshold for separate reporting under the accounting guidance governing segment reporting.

Basis of Presentation

We present the results of our business segments on the basis in which management internally evaluates operating performance to establish short- and long-term performance goals, develop budgets and forecasts, identify potential trends, allocate resources and make compensation decisions. During fiscal year 2022, we changed the presentation of our segment results to align more closely to the presentation of financial information reviewed regularly by our Chief Executive Officer, the chief operating decision maker, to assess performance and inform the decision-making process in managing our business operations. This presentation change excludes derivative forward value gains and losses from the results of operations for each segment and includes net periodic derivative cash settlement expense amounts as a component of interest expense, which represents the only difference between the accounting and reporting for our business segment results of operations and our consolidated total results of operations. We recast the presentation of our business segment results for the fiscal years ended May 31, 2021 and 2020, to align with the current period presentation.



151

  Year Ended May 31, 2018
(Dollars in thousands) CFC Other Elimination Consolidated
Statement of operations:        
Interest income $1,067,016
 $49,182
 $(38,841) $1,077,357
Interest expense (791,836) (39,740) 38,841
 (792,735)
Net interest income 275,180
 9,442
 
 284,622
Benefit for loan losses 18,575
 
 
 18,575
Net interest income after benefit for loan losses 293,755
 9,442
 
 303,197
Non-interest income:        
Fee and other income 17,369
 1,372
 (1,163) 17,578
Derivative gains (losses):        
  Derivative cash settlements expense (71,906) (2,375) 
 (74,281)
  Derivative forward value gains 301,694
 4,308
 
 306,002
Derivative gains 229,788
 1,933
 
 231,721
Total non-interest income 247,157
 3,305
 (1,163) 249,299
Non-interest expense:        
General and administrative expenses (83,783) (7,101) 
 (90,884)
Other non-interest expense (1,943) (1,163) 1,163
 (1,943)
Total non-interest expense (85,726) (8,264) 1,163
 (92,827)
Income before income taxes 455,186
 4,483
 
 459,669
Income tax expense 
 (2,305) 
 (2,305)
Net income $455,186
 $2,178
 $
 $457,364
         
  May 31, 2018
  CFC Other Elimination Consolidated
Assets:        
Total loans outstanding $25,134,384
 $1,149,575
 $(1,116,465) $25,167,494
Deferred loan origination costs 11,114
 
 
 11,114
Less: Allowance for loan losses (18,801) 
 
 (18,801)
Loans to members, net 25,126,697
 1,149,575
 (1,116,465) 25,159,807
Other assets 1,520,118
 106,455
 (96,176) 1,530,397
Total assets $26,646,815
 $1,256,030
 $(1,212,641) $26,690,204










NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


Business Segment Reporting Methodology



The results of our business segments are intended to present the separate results for each of the legal entities included in our consolidated financial statements. As discussed in “Note 15—Variable Interest Entities,” all of NCSC’s and RTFC’s funding is either provided by CFC or guaranteed by CFC, the terms and conditions of which are stipulated in a loan and security agreement and a guarantee agreement between CFC and each legal entity. Pursuant to the guarantee agreement, CFC unconditionally guarantees full indemnification to NCSC and RTFC for any credit losses. In addition, CFC manages the business operations of NCSC and RTFC under a management agreement that automatically renews on an annual basis unless the agreement is terminated by either party.


We report loans and interest and fees earned on loans based on the legal entity that holds the loans. CFC borrows from various sources to fund the operations of CFC, NCSC and RTFC, the cost of which is reflected in CFC’s interest expense. NCSC and RTFC each borrow from CFC to fund loans to their members, the cost of which is reported as interest expense by each legal entity. CFC charges NCSC and RTFC a management fee, which CFC reports as a component of fee and other income. NCSC and RTFC report the management fee charged by CFC as a component of non-interest expense. CFC and NCSC use derivatives, primarily interest rate swaps, to manage interest rate risk. Because we generally do not elect to apply hedge accounting to our interest rate swaps, changes in the fair value of our interest rate swaps are recorded in earnings in our consolidated total results of operations. However, management excludes the impact of derivative forward value gains and losses and includes the net periodic derivative cash settlement interest expense amounts as a component of interest expense in reporting our segment results of operations.
  Year Ended May 31, 2017
(Dollars in thousands) CFC Other Elimination Consolidated
Statement of operations:        
Interest income $1,026,302
 $43,502
 $(33,170) $1,036,634
Interest expense (740,695) (34,250) 33,207
 (741,738)
Net interest income 285,607
 9,252
 37
 294,896
Provision for loan losses (5,978) 
 
 (5,978)
Net interest income after provision for loan losses 279,629
 9,252
 37
 288,918
Non-interest income:        
Fee and other income 18,858
 3,528
 (2,673) 19,713
Derivative gains (losses):        
  Derivative cash settlements expense (81,489) (2,989) 
 (84,478)
  Derivative forward value gains 175,379
 4,002
 
 179,381
Derivative gains 93,890
 1,013
 
 94,903
Results of operations from foreclosed assets (1,749) 
 
 (1,749)
Total non-interest income 110,999
 4,541
 (2,673) 112,867
Non-interest expense:        
General and administrative expenses (78,965) (7,261) 
 (86,226)
Gains on early extinguishment of debt 192
 
 
 192
Other non-interest expense (1,949) (2,635) 2,636
 (1,948)
Total non-interest expense (80,722) (9,896) 2,636
 (87,982)
Income before income taxes 309,906
 3,897
 
 313,803
Income tax expense 
 (1,704) 
 (1,704)
Net income $309,906
 $2,193
 $
 $312,099



Segment Results and Reconciliation

SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)

Condensed quarterly financial informationThe following tables display segment results of operations for fiscalthe years ended May 31, 20192022, 2021 and 20182020, assets attributable to each segment as of May 31, 2022 and 2021 and a reconciliation of total segment amounts to our consolidated total amounts.



152





NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Table 16.1: Business Segment Information
 Year Ended May 31, 2022
(Dollars in thousands)CFCNCSC and RTFCSegments Total
Reclasses and Adjustments(1)
Intersegment Eliminations(2)
Consolidated
Results of operations:    
Interest income$1,133,173 $43,295 $1,176,468 $ $(35,225)$1,141,243 
Interest expense(705,534)(35,225)(740,759) 35,225 (705,534)
Derivative cash settlements interest expense(99,768)(1,617)(101,385)101,385   
Interest expense(805,302)(36,842)(842,144)101,385 35,225 (705,534)
Net interest income327,871 6,453 334,324 101,385  435,709 
Benefit for credit losses17,972 3,334 21,306  (3,334)17,972 
Net interest income after benefit for credit losses345,843 9,787 355,630 101,385 (3,334)453,681 
Non-interest income:
Fee and other income22,426 70 22,496  (5,303)17,193 
Derivative gains:
Derivative cash settlements interest expense   (101,385) (101,385)
Derivative forward value gains   557,867  557,867 
Derivative gains   456,482  456,482 
Investment securities losses(30,179) (30,179)  (30,179)
Total non-interest income(7,753)70 (7,683)456,482 (5,303)443,496 
Non-interest expense:
General and administrative expenses(93,465)(8,102)(101,567) 6,381 (95,186)
Losses on early extinguishment of debt(754) (754)  (754)
Other non-interest expense(1,552)(2,256)(3,808) 2,256 (1,552)
Total non-interest expense(95,771)(10,358)(106,129) 8,637 (97,492)
Income (loss) before income taxes242,319 (501)241,818 557,867  799,685 
Income tax provision (1,148)(1,148)  (1,148)
Net income (loss)$242,319 $(1,649)$240,670 $557,867 $ $798,537 
May 31, 2022
CFCNCSC and RTFCSegments Total
Reclasses and Adjustments(1)
Intersegment Eliminations(2)
Consolidated Total
Assets:
Total loans outstanding$30,031,459 $1,178,479 $31,209,938 $ $(1,158,584)$30,051,354 
Deferred loan origination costs12,032  12,032   12,032 
Loans to members30,043,491 1,178,479 31,221,970  (1,158,584)30,063,386 
Less: Allowance for credit losses(67,560)(2,735)(70,295) 2,735 (67,560)
Loans to members, net29,975,931 1,175,744 31,151,675  (1,155,849)29,995,826 
Other assets1,245,884 97,394 1,343,278  (87,722)1,255,556 
Total assets$31,221,815 $1,273,138 $32,494,953 $ $(1,243,571)$31,251,382 


153





NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 Year Ended May 31, 2021
(Dollars in thousands)CFCNCSC and RTFCSegments Total
Reclasses and Adjustments(1)
Intersegment Eliminations(2)
Consolidated Total
Results of operations:    
Interest income$1,108,543 $43,632 $1,152,175 $— $(35,574)$1,116,601 
Interest expense(702,063)(35,574)(737,637)— 35,574 (702,063)
Derivative cash settlements interest expense(113,951)(1,694)(115,645)115,645 — — 
Interest expense(816,014)(37,268)(853,282)115,645 35,574 (702,063)
Net interest income292,529 6,364 298,893 115,645 — 414,538 
Provision for credit losses(28,507)(3,163)(31,670)— 3,163 (28,507)
Net interest income after provision for credit losses264,022 3,201 267,223 115,645 3,163 386,031 
Non-interest income:
Fee and other income23,732 5,963 29,695 — (10,766)18,929 
Derivative gains:
Derivative cash settlements interest expense— — — (115,645)— (115,645)
Derivative forward value gains— — — 621,946 — 621,946 
Derivative gains— — — 506,301 — 506,301 
Investment securities gains1,495 — 1,495 — — 1,495 
Total non-interest income25,227 5,963 31,190 506,301 (10,766)526,725 
Non-interest expense:
General and administrative expenses(93,085)(7,849)(100,934)— 6,229 (94,705)
Losses on early extinguishment of debt(1,456)— (1,456)— — (1,456)
Other non-interest expense(1,619)(1,374)(2,993)— 1,374 (1,619)
Total non-interest expense(96,160)(9,223)(105,383)— 7,603 (97,780)
Income (loss) before income taxes193,089 (59)193,030 621,946 — 814,976 
Income tax provision— (998)(998)— — (998)
Net income (loss)$193,089 $(1,057)$192,032 $621,946 $— $813,978 
May 31, 2021
CFCNCSC and RTFCSegments Total
Reclasses and Adjustments(1)
Intersegment Eliminations(2)
Consolidated Total
Assets:    
Total loans outstanding$28,395,040 $1,127,251 $29,522,291 $— $(1,107,184)$28,415,107 
Deferred loan origination costs11,854 — 11,854 — — 11,854 
Loans to members28,406,894 1,127,251 29,534,145 — (1,107,184)28,426,961 
Less: Allowance for credit losses(85,532)(6,069)(91,601)— 6,069 (85,532)
Loans to members, net28,321,362 1,121,182 29,442,544 — (1,101,115)28,341,429 
Other assets1,285,591 106,367 1,391,958 — (95,024)1,296,934 
Total assets$29,606,953 $1,227,549 $30,834,502 $— $(1,196,139)$29,638,363 


154





NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 Year Ended May 31, 2020
(Dollars in thousands)CFCNCSC and RTFCSegments Total
Reclasses and Adjustments(1)
Intersegment Eliminations(2)
Consolidated Total
Results of operations:    
Interest income$1,143,397 $47,107 $1,190,504 $— $(39,218)$1,151,286 
Interest expense(820,841)(39,466)(860,307)— 39,218 (821,089)
Derivative cash settlements interest expense(54,707)(1,166)(55,873)55,873 — — 
Interest expense(875,548)(40,632)(916,180)55,873 39,218 (821,089)
Net interest income267,849 6,475 274,324 55,873 — 330,197 
Provision for credit losses(35,590)(1,272)(36,862)— 1,272 (35,590)
Net interest income after provision for credit losses232,259 5,203 237,462 55,873 1,272 294,607 
Non-interest income:
Fee and other income28,309 10,796 39,105 — (16,144)22,961 
Derivative losses:
Derivative cash settlements interest expense— — — (55,873)— (55,873)
Derivative forward value losses— — — (734,278)— (734,278)
Derivative losses— — — (790,151)— (790,151)
Investment securities gains9,431 — 9,431 — — 9,431 
Total non-interest income37,740 10,796 48,536 (790,151)(16,144)(757,759)
Non-interest expense:
General and administrative expenses(98,808)(8,940)(107,748)— 6,581 (101,167)
Losses on early extinguishment of debt(69)(614)(683)— — (683)
Other non-interest expense(25,588)(8,291)(33,879)— 8,291 (25,588)
Total non-interest expense(124,465)(17,845)(142,310)— 14,872 (127,438)
Income (loss) before income taxes145,534 (1,846)143,688 (734,278)— (590,590)
Income tax benefit— 1,160 1,160 — — 1,160 
Net income (loss)$145,534 $(686)$144,848 $(734,278)$— $(589,430)
____________________________
(1)Consists of (i) the reclassification of net periodic derivative settlement interest expense amounts, which we report as a component of interest expense for business segment reporting purposes but is presented below.included in derivatives gains (losses) in our consolidated total results and (ii) derivative forward value gains and losses, which we exclude from our business segment results but is included in derivatives gains (losses) in our consolidated total results.
(2)Consists of intercompany borrowings payable by NCSC and RTFC to CFC and the interest related to those borrowings, management fees paid by NCSC and RTFC to CFC and other intercompany amounts, all of which are eliminated in consolidation.


155
  Fiscal Year May 31, 2019
(Dollars in thousands) Aug 31, 2018 Nov 30, 2018 Feb 28, 2019 May 31, 2019 Total
Interest income $278,491

$281,253

$285,566

$290,360

$1,135,670
Interest expense (210,231)
(204,166)
(207,335)
(214,477)
(836,209)
Net interest income 68,260

77,087

78,231

75,883

299,461
Benefit (provision) for loan losses 109

1,788

(182)
(449)
1,266
Net interest income after benefit (provision) for loan losses 68,369

78,875

78,049

75,434

300,727
Non-interest income (loss):          
Derivative gains (losses) 7,183

63,343

(132,174)
(301,693)
(363,341)
Other non-interest income 3,185

4,321

3,714

2,336

13,556
Total non-interest income (loss) 10,368

67,664

(128,460)
(299,357)
(349,785)
Non-interest expense (30,699)
(26,570)
(21,209)
(23,463)
(101,941)
Income (loss) before income taxes 48,038

119,969

(71,620)
(247,386)
(150,999)
Income tax expense (benefit) (60)
(243)
149

(57)
(211)
Net income (loss) 47,978

119,726

(71,471)
(247,443)
(151,210)
Less: Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests (13)
(466)
539

1,919

1,979
Net income (loss) attributable to CFC $47,965

$119,260

$(70,932)
$(245,524)
$(149,231)



  Fiscal Year May 31, 2018
(Dollars in thousands) Aug 31, 2017 Nov 30, 2017 Feb 28, 2018 May 31, 2018 Total
Interest income $265,915
 $265,823
 $271,468
 $274,151
 $1,077,357
Interest expense (192,731) (195,170) (198,071) (206,763) (792,735)
Net interest income 73,184
 70,653
 73,397
 67,388
 284,622
Benefit (provision) for loan losses 298
 304
 (1,105) 19,078
 18,575
Net interest income after benefit (provision) for loan losses 73,482
 70,957
 72,292
 86,466
 303,197
Non-interest income (loss):          
Derivative gains (losses) (46,198) 125,593
 168,048
 (15,722) 231,721
Other non-interest income 3,921
 5,532
 3,935
 4,190
 17,578
Total non-interest income (loss) (42,277) 131,125
 171,983
 (11,532) 249,299
Non-interest expense (22,158) (22,532) (22,614) (25,523) (92,827)
Income before income taxes 9,047
 179,550
 221,661
 49,411
 459,669
Income tax expense (32) (827) (632) (814) (2,305)
Net income 9,015
 178,723
 221,029
 48,597
 457,364
Less: Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest 118
 (1,150) (1,614) 468
 (2,178)
Net income attributable to CFC $9,133
 $177,573
 $219,415
 $49,065
 $455,186



Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure


None.


Item 9A. Controls and Procedures


Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures


Senior management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. At the end of the period covered by this Report, based on this evaluation process, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective at the reasonable assurance level.


Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting


The management of National Rural Utilities Cooperative Finance Corporation (“we”,we,” “our” or “us”) is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Our internal control over financial reporting is designed under the supervision of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:


(i)pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets;
(ii)provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of ours are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and our directors;
(iii)provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or dispositions of our assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements; and
(iv)ensure disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

(i)pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets;
(ii)provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of ours are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and our directors;
(iii)provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or dispositions of our assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements; and
(iv)ensure disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Any system of internal control, no matter how well designed, has inherent limitations, including but not limited to the possibility that a control can be circumvented or overridden and misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. Also, because of changes in conditions, internal control effectiveness may vary over time. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.


Our management assessed the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of May 31, 2019.2022. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (“2013 Framework”).


Based on management’s assessment and those criteria, management believes that we maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of May 31, 2019.2022.


This annual reportAnnual Report on Form 10-K does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to the rules of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission that permit us to furnish only management’s report with this annual reportAnnual Report on Form 10-K.






156


Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting


There were noAs a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, beginning in mid-March 2020, certain of our employees began working remotely. We have not identified any material changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, orresulting from the changes to the working environment. We are reasonably likelycontinually monitoring and assessing the COVID-19 situation to materially affect,determine any potential impacts on the design and operating effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting.



By:/s/ J. ANDREW DONBy:/s/ YU LING WANG
J. Andrew DonYu Ling Wang
Chief Executive OfficerSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
August 8, 2022August 8, 2022
By:/s/ SHELDON C. PETERSENBy:/s/ J. ANDREW DON
Sheldon C. Petersen
Chief Executive Officer
J. Andrew Don
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
July 31, 2019July 31, 2019
By:/s/ ROBERT E. GEIER
Robert E. Geier
Vice President and Controller
July 31, 2019




Item 9B. Other Information


None.



Item 9C. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections

Not applicable.


157


PART III


Item 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

Item 10.    Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
(a) Directors  
Name Age 
Director
Since
 
Date Present
Term Expires
Kent D. Farmer (President of CFC) 61 2014 2020
Dean R. Tesch (Vice President of CFC) 57 2015 2021
Alan W. Wattles (Secretary-Treasurer of CFC) 53 2016 2022
Thomas A. Bailey 77 2019 2022
Robert Brockman 69 2015 2019
Chris D. Christensen 55 2019 
   2022(1)
David E. Felkel 58 2018 2021
Dennis Fulk 68 2019 2022
Barbara E. Hampton 57 2019 2022
Doyle Jay Hanson 73 2015 2021
Thomas L. Hayes 63 2014 2020
Bradley P. Janorschke 55 2019 2022
Jimmy A. LaFoy 78 2015 2021
G. Anthony Norton 67 2019 2022
Debra L. Robinson 61 2016 2019
Timothy Rodriguez 58 2018 2021
Bradley J. Schardin 59 2015 2021
Marsha L. Thompson 64 2017 2020
Stephen C. Vail 60 2014 2020
Bruce A. Vitosh 53 2017 2020
Todd P. Ware 53 2015 2021
Gregory D. Williams 60 2015 2020
Curtis Wynn 55 2017 
    2021(1)
(a) Directors 
NameAgeDirector
Since
Date Present
Term Expires
Bruce A. Vitosh (President of CFC)5620172023
David E. Felkel (Vice President of CFC)6120182024
G. Anthony Norton (Secretary-Treasurer of CFC)7020192025
Charles A. Abel II (2)
5320222025
Anthony A. Anderson602021
   2024(1)
Thomas A. Bailey8020192025
Kevin M. Bender6320202023
Robert Brockman (3)
7220152022
Chris D. Christensen582019
   2022(1)
Jared Echternach5020212024
Timothy Eldridge6420212024
Dennis Fulk7120192025
Barbara E. Hampton6020192025
William Keith Hayward5720202023
Michael Heinen5920212024
Bradley P. Janorschke5820192025
Anthony Larson4820202023
Shane Larson (2)
5920222025
Brent McRae6220212024
John Metcalf5720212024
Kendall Montgomery5820202025
Jeffrey Allen Rehder5620202024
Mark A. Suggs6520202023
Marsha L. Thompson6720172023
Alan W. Wattles (3)
5620162022
____________________________
(1)Pursuant to CFC’s bylaws, NRECA determines the method of director election and length of term for the seat occupied by this director.

(2)Director seated on June 20, 2022.
(3)Director’s term ended on June 20, 2022.

Under CFC’s bylaws, the board of directors shall be composed of the following individuals:
20 directors, which must include one general manager and one director of a member system from each of 10 districts (but no more than one director from each state except in a district where only one state has members);
two directors designated by NRECA; and
if the board determines at its discretion that an at-large director shall be elected, one at-large director who satisfies the requirements of an Audit Committeeaudit committee financial expert as defined by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is a trustee, director, manager, Chief Executive Officerchief executive officer or Chief Financial Officerchief financial officer of a member.


The 20 district-level directors are each elected by a vote of the members within the district for which the director serves. The at-large director who satisfies the requirements of an Audit Committeeaudit committee financial expert is elected by the vote of all members. All CFC directors, other than the two directors designated by NRECA, are elected for a three-year term and can serve a
158


maximum of two consecutive terms. Each CFC member (other than associates) is entitled to one vote with respect to elections of directors in their districts.



(b) Executive Officers   
TitleNameAge
Held Present
Office Since(1)
President and DirectorBruce A. Vitosh562022
Vice President and DirectorDavid E. Felkel612022
Secretary-Treasurer and DirectorG. Anthony Norton702022
Chief Executive OfficerJ. Andrew Don622021
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerYu Ling Wang472021
Senior Vice President, Member ServicesJoel Allen562014
Senior Vice President and General Counsel
Roberta B. Aronson (2)
642014
Senior Vice President and General CounselNathan Howard462022
Senior Vice President and Chief Corporate Affairs OfficerBrad L. Captain522014
Senior Vice President and Chief Risk OfficerGholam M. Saleh502022
Senior Vice President and Chief Operating OfficerGary Bradbury512022
Senior Vice President, Strategic ServicesMark Snowden472022

___________________________
(b) Executive Officers      
Title Name Age 
Held Present
Office Since(1)
President and Director Kent D. Farmer 61 2019
Vice President and Director Dean R. Tesch 57 2019
Secretary-Treasurer and Director Alan W. Wattles 53 2019
Chief Executive Officer Sheldon C. Petersen 66 1995
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer J. Andrew Don 59 2014
Senior Vice President & Chief Administrative Officer Graceann D. Clendenen 61 2019
Senior Vice President, Member Services Joel Allen 53 2014
Senior Vice President and General Counsel Roberta B. Aronson 61 2014
Senior Vice President, Credit Risk Management John M. Borak 74 2003
Senior Vice President, Corporate Relations Brad L. Captain 49 2014
Senior Vice President, Strategic Services Steven M. Kettler 60 2014
Senior Vice President, Loan Operations Robin C. Reed 57 2016
Senior Vice President, Business and Industry Development Gregory Starheim 56 2016
___________________________
(1) Refers to fiscal year.

(2)Retired on March 31, 2022.

The President, Vice President and Secretary-Treasurer are elected annually by the board of directors at its first organizational meeting immediately following CFC’s annual membership meeting, each to serve a term of one year; the Chief Executive Officer serves at the pleasure of the board of directors; and the other Executive Officers serve at the pleasure of the Chief Executive Officer.


(c) Identification of Certain Significant Employees


Not applicable.


(d) Family Relationships


No family relationship exists between any director or executive officer and any other director or executive officer of the registrant.


(e) (1) and (2) Business Experience and Directorships


Following is biographical information about the business experience for each member of the CFC Board of Directors and executive officers.

Directors

Mr. Farmer Vitoshhas been the presidentgeneral manager and CEO of Rappahannock Electric CooperativeNorris Public Power District in Fredericksburg, Virginia,Beatrice, Nebraska, since 20042012. From 2008 to 2012, Mr. Vitosh was the manager of finance and has been employed there in various roles, including chief operating officeraccounting at Norris Public Power District. Mr. Vitosh is a CPA and chief financial officer, since 1979. Mr. Farmer has been the vice chairman of the Old Dominion Electric Cooperative Board of Directors since July 2014 and on the University of Mary Washington Business Advisory Board since 2013. He has served asis a board member of the Virginia, Maryland and Delaware AssociationNebraska Society of Electric CooperativesCertified Public Accountants. Mr. Vitosh has also been a self-employed farmer since 2004. As the presidentgeneral manager and CEO of Rappahannock Electric Cooperative,Norris Public Power District, Mr. FarmerVitosh has acquired extensive experience with and knowledge of the rural electric cooperative industry and, therefore, we believe Mr. FarmerVitosh has the qualifications, skills and experience necessary to act in the best interests of CFC and to serve as a director on the CFC board.


159


Mr. Tesch Felkel has served as board chairmanbeen president and CEO of TaylorEdisto Electric Cooperative, Inc. in Stetsonville, Wisconsin,Bamberg, South Carolina, since August 2014. Mr. Tesch also served as a director for the cooperative’s wholesale power supplier, Dairyland Power Cooperative, headquartered in La Crosse, Wisconsin, from June 2014 to June 2019. Mr. Tesch1997. He has been a certified financial plannertrustee on the Board of Trustees of Central Electric Power Cooperative since 2000 and is a former elementary school teacher. From 2010 to January 2019 he served as a member of the Certified Financial Planners Board Item Writing Group.1997. As the board chairmanpresident and CEO of TaylorEdisto Electric Cooperative, Inc., Mr. TeschFelkel has acquired extensive experience with and knowledge of the rural electric cooperative industry and, therefore, we believe Mr. Tesch has the qualifications, skills and experience necessary to act in the best interest of CFC and to serve as a director on the CFC board.


Mr. Wattles has been president and chief executive officer of Monroe County Electric Co-Operative in Waterloo, Illinois since 2002. He has been a board member of Southern Illinois Power Cooperative since 2002. As president and chief executive officer of Monroe County Electric Co-Operative, Mr. Wattles has acquired extensive experience with and knowledge of the rural electric cooperative industry and, therefore, we believe Mr. WattlesFelkel has the qualifications, skills and experience necessary to act in the best interests of CFC and to serve as a director on the CFC board.


Mr. Norton has served as a director of Snapping Shoals Electric Membership Corporation in Covington, Georgia, since 1993. Mr. Norton has also served as a director at Georgia Electric Membership Corporation in Tucker, Georgia, since 2009 and Georgia System Operations Corporation in Tucker, Georgia, since 2012. Mr. Norton owned and operated Conyers Pharmacy in Conyers, Georgia, from 1982 to 2018. As a director of Snapping Shoals Electric Membership Corporation, Mr. Norton has acquired extensive experience with and knowledge of the rural electric cooperative industry and, therefore, we believe Mr. Norton has the qualifications, skills and experience necessary to act in the best interests of CFC and to serve as a director on the CFC board.

Mr. Abel has served as a director of Sangre de Cristo Electric Association in Buena Vista, Colorado since June 2015, served as its treasurer from November 2015 through June 2020 and currently serves as secretary of the board. He has served as director of Tri-State Generation and Transmission in Westminster, Colorado, since April 2019 and is currently on the Finance & Audit Committee and Land & Water Committee. Additionally, Mr. Abel served as director of Western United Electric Supply from April 2017 through April 2019. In addition to being a self-employed Certified Public Accountant, Mr. Abel was employed by High Country Bank as a commercial loan officer from May 2019 through October 2020. Prior to May 2019, he was a majority equity owner and managing principal for Abel & Eggleston, CPAs, LLC since 2008. As a director of Sangre de Cristo Electric Association, Mr. Abel has acquired extensive experience with and knowledge of the rural electric cooperative industry and, therefore, we believe Mr. Abel has the qualifications, skills and experience necessary to act in the best interests of CFC and to serve as a director on the CFC board.

Mr. Andersonhas served as the general manager of Cherryland Electric Cooperative in Grawn, Michigan, since 2003. Additionally, Mr. Anderson has served as a director of NRECA in Arlington, Virginia since 2008 and has been its vice president since March 4, 2021. He has also served as director of the Michigan Electric Cooperative Association in Lansing, Michigan, since 2003, and as its vice president since 2016. As the general manager of Cherryland Electric Cooperative, Mr. Anderson has acquired extensive experience with and knowledge of the rural electric cooperative industry and, therefore, we believe Mr. Anderson has the qualifications, skills and experience necessary to act in the best interests of CFC and to serve as a director on the CFC board.

Mr. Bailey has served as a director of Vermont Electric Cooperative in Johnson, Vermont, since January 2004. From 2006 to 2015, Mr. Bailey served as board president of Vermont Electric Cooperative. He has operated a real estate investment business since 2009. As a director of Vermont Electric Cooperative, Mr. Bailey has acquired extensive experience with and knowledge of the rural electric cooperative industry and, therefore, we believe Mr. Bailey has the qualifications, skills and experience necessary to act in the best interests of CFC and to serve as a director on the CFC board.


Mr. Bender has served as a director of Carroll White Rural Electric Membership Corporation in Monticello, Indiana, since January 2012. Additionally, he has served as president of Carroll White Rural Electric Membership Corporation since July 2017. Mr. Bender also served as the president and CEO of the Bank of Wolcott in Wolcott, Indiana, from January 2010 to March 2021. He has served as a director of Wolcott Bancorp since March 1995 and was elected chairman of the board in March 2021. From June 2008 to January 2012, he served as a director of Carroll County Rural Electric Membership Corporation in Delphi, Indiana. As a director and president of Carroll White Rural Electric Membership Corporation, Mr. Bender has acquired extensive experience with and knowledge of the rural electric cooperative industry and, therefore, we believe Mr. Bender has the qualifications, skills and experience necessary to act in the best interests of CFC and to serve as a director on the CFC board.

Mr. Brockman has been a director at Wheatland Rural Electric Association in Wheatland, Wyoming, since 2006. He has served as president and real estate broker for Keyhole Land Co. in Wheatland, Wyoming, since 1988. As a director of Wheatland Rural Electric Association, Mr. Brockman has acquired extensive experience with and knowledge of the rural electric cooperative industry and, therefore, we believe Mr. Brockman has the qualifications, skills and experience necessary to act in the best interests of CFC and to serve as a director on the CFC board.


160


Mr. Christensen has served as a director of Norval Electric Cooperative, Inc. in Glasgow, Montana, since 2004. Mr. Christensen has also served as a director of the NRECA Board of Directors since 2014, and has served as NRECA board vice president since March 2019.4, 2021. He has been a self-employed rancher since 1979. As a director of Norval Electric Cooperative, Inc. and NRECA, Mr. Christensen has acquired extensive experience with and knowledge of the rural electric cooperative industry and, therefore, we believe Mr. Christensen has the qualifications, skills and experience necessary to act in the best interests of CFC and to serve as a director on the CFC board.


Mr. FelkelEchternach has been president and CEO of EdistoBeltrami Electric Cooperative Inc. in Bamberg, South CarolinaBemidji, Minnesota, since 1997.2016, and a director of Cooperative Development, LLC, its subsidiary, since 2016. He also served as CEO of North Itasca Electric Cooperative Inc. in Big Fork, Minnesota, from 2012 to 2016. Mr. Echternach has beenalso served as president and director of the Greater Bemidji Economic Development Corporation in Bemidji, Minnesota, since 2016, and as a trustee on the Boarddirector of Trustees of Central Electric Power CooperativeSecurity Bank USA in Bemidji, Minnesota, since 1997.2020. As the president and CEO of EdistoBeltrami Electric Cooperative, Inc., Mr. FelkelEchternach has acquired extensive experience with and knowledge of the rural electric cooperative industry and, therefore, we believe Mr. FelkelEchternach has the qualifications, skills and experience necessary to act in the best interests of CFC and to serve as a director on the CFC Board.board.


Mr. Eldridge has served as a director of Fleming-Mason Energy Cooperative, Inc. in Flemingsburg, Kentucky, since 2000, and as a director of East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc. in Winchester, Kentucky, since 2014. Mr. Eldridge has also been Audit Committee chairman of Fleming-Mason Energy since 2014. He has served as a director of Citizens Bank located in Morehead, Kentucky, since 2013 and served as its Audit Committee chairman throughout that time. Since 2015, Mr. Eldridge has been a member-owner and Certified Public Accountant at Baldwin CPAs, PLLC in Flemingsburg, Kentucky. He has held his Kentucky CPA license since 1986. As a director of Fleming-Mason Energy Cooperative, Inc., Mr. Eldridge has acquired extensive experience with and knowledge of the rural electric cooperative industry and, therefore, we believe Mr. Eldridge has the qualifications, skills and experience necessary to act in the best interests of CFC and to serve as a director on the CFC board.

Mr. Fulk has served as a director of Platte-Clay Electric Cooperative in Kearney, Missouri, since 1993, including serving as board Presidentpresident from 2000 to 2015. He served as a director of NW Electric Power Cooperative from 20142004 until April 2019, serving as board Vice Presidentvice president from 2011 to April 2019. Mr. Fulk also served as a director of the Association of Missouri Electric Cooperatives from 2000 until 2015, serving as board Presidentpresident from 2010 to 2011. As a director of Platte-Clay Electric Cooperative, Mr. Fulk has acquired extensive experience with and knowledge of the rural electric cooperative industry and, therefore, we believe Mr. Fulk has the qualifications, skills and experience necessary to act in the best interests of CFC and to serve as a director on the CFC board.


Mrs. Hampton has served currently serves as the Senior Vice President, CFO atpresident and CEO of Georgia Transmission Corporation in Tucker, Georgia, since 2005.a position she began in January 2021. She served as the senior vice president and CFO of the organization from 2005 until moving to the CEO role. Mrs. Hampton has been a Certified Public Accountant since 1990. As Senior Vice President, CFOpresident and CEO of Georgia Transmission Corporation, Mrs. Hampton has acquired extensive experience with and knowledge of the rural electric cooperative industry and, therefore, we believe Mrs. Hampton has the qualifications, skills and experience necessary to act in the best interests of CFC and to serve as a director on the CFC board. We believe Mrs. Hampton’s experience with accounting principles, financial reporting rules and regulations and evaluating financial results makes her qualified to serve as CFC’s Audit Committeean audit committee financial expert as defined by Section 407 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.2002 and as the chairperson of CFC’s Audit Committee.


Mr. HansonHayward has beenserved as the general manager and CEO of North East Mississippi Electric Power Association in Oxford, Mississippi, since February 2014. From July 2004 to January 2014, he served as its manager of Engineering and Operations. Mr. Hayward has also served as a director of Fall River Rural Electric CooperativeSEDC, a software cooperative in Ashton, IdahoAtlanta, Georgia, since 2005. From 1968 until 2001 Mr. Hanson served as a cooperative extension agent for the University of Idaho and University of Wyoming. He also chaired the Idaho Consumer-Owned Utilities Association Nominating Committee from 2013 until 2014. As a directorthe general manager and CEO of Fall River RuralNorth East Mississippi Electric Cooperative,Power Association, Mr. HansonHayward has acquired extensive experience with and knowledge of the rural electric cooperative industry and, therefore, we believe Mr. HansonHayward has the qualifications, skills and experience necessary to act in the best interests of CFC and to serve as a director on the CFC board.




Mr. HayesHeinen has been general manager of Jefferson Davis Electric Cooperative, Inc. in Jennings, Louisiana, since 1999. He has also served as a director of Brown County Rural Electricalthe Association of Louisiana Electric Cooperatives in Sleepy Eye, MinnesotaBaton Rouge, Louisiana, since 1997. Mr. Hayes also served as the vice president of Brown County Rural Electrical Association from March 2014 to March 2016 and as president from 2004 to March 2014. He has been a self-employed farmer since 1973. Mr. Hayes was a director and utility committee chair of Cooperative Network from 1998 to 2014.1999. As the presidentgeneral manager of Brown County Rural Electrical Association,Jefferson Davis Electric Cooperative, Inc., Mr. HayesHeinen has acquired extensive experience with
161


and knowledge of the rural electric cooperative industry and, therefore, we believe Mr. HayesHeinen has the qualifications, skills and experience necessary to act in the best interests of CFC and to serve as a director on the CFC board.


Mr. Janorschkehas been the General Managergeneral manager at Homer Electric Association, Inc. in Homer, Alaska, since 2004. He has also been the General Managergeneral manager of Alaska Electric and Energy Cooperative in Homer, Alaska, since 2004. Mr. Janorschke has also served on the Board of Trustees of the Northwest Public Power Association in Vancouver, Washington, since 2014. As the General Managergeneral manager of Homer Electric Association, Inc., Mr. Janorschke has acquired extensive experience with and knowledge of the rural electric cooperative industry and, therefore, we believe Mr. Janorschke has the qualifications, skills and experience necessary to act in the best interests of CFC and to serve as a director on the CFC board.


Mr. LaFoyAnthony Larson has served as a director of Slope Electric Cooperative, Inc. in New England, North Dakota, since June 2010, and the secretary-treasurer for Baldwin County Electric Member Corporationas a director of Upper Missouri Power Cooperative in Gulf Shores, Alabama,Sidney, Montana, since July 2009.April 2000. Mr. LaFoy is a certified public accountant and since 1977 has owned and operated the public accounting firm LaFoy & Associates. He is a founding organizer andLarson has served as aan advisory board member of the Southern States Bank BoardDakotas America since August 2007. Mr. LaFoy also wasSeptember 2017, a memberdirector of the Farmers National Bank BoardInnovative Energy Alliance since January 2019 and a director of Opelika from 1989Maintenance Solutions Cooperative since January 2019, each of which provides services to 2002 and the First American Bank Advisory Board from 2002electric cooperatives. In addition to 2006. Mr. LaFoy wasbeing a council member from 1981 untilself-employed rancher since 1986 and presidenta supervisor at Adams County Soil Conservation District in Hettinger, North Dakota, since February 2020, Mr. Larson was an ambulatory care officer at West River Health Services from 1985 until 1986 of the Alabama Society of Certified Public Accountants. He was also a council member of the American Institute of Certified Public AccountantsAugust 2016 to September 2019, and an agricultural banker at Dacotah Bank from 1986 until 1990.October 2012 to January 2015. As a director and secretary-treasurer of Baldwin CountySlope Electric Member Corporation,Cooperative, Inc., Mr. LaFoyLarson has acquired extensive experience with and knowledge of the rural electric cooperative industry and, therefore, we believe Mr. LaFoyLarson has the qualifications, skills and experience necessary to act in the best interests of CFC and to serve as a director on the CFC board.


Mr. NortonShane Larson has served as the CEO of Rock Energy Cooperative in Janesville, Wisconsin, since August 2000. From 2013 to 2022, Mr. Larson served as a director of Snapping ShoalsFederated Rural Electric Membership CorporationInsurance Exchange in Covington, Georgia since 1993. Mr. NortonShawnee, Kansas. He has also served as a director at Georgia Electric Membership Corporationof Charge EV, LLC in Tucker, Georgia,Rosholt, Wisconsin, since 20092021 and Georgia System Operations Corporationas its vice chairman in Tucker, Georgia, since 2012.2021. Mr. Norton has owned and operated Conyers Pharmacy in Conyers, Georgia from 1982 to 2018. AsLarson served as a director of Snapping Shoals Electric Membership Corporation,Wisconsin’s Managers’ Association from 2006 to 2008 and as its president in 2008. He was also a board member of Empower Energy from 2003 until 2004. As a CEO of Rock Energy Cooperative, Mr. NortonLarson has acquired extensive experience with and knowledge of the rural electric cooperative industry and, therefore, we believe Mr. NortonLarson has the qualifications, skills and experience necessary to act in the best interests of CFC and to serve as a director on the CFC board.


Mrs. RobinsonMr. McRae has served as chief executive officer and general managera director of Wood CountyMcCone Electric Cooperative, Inc. in Quitman, TexasCircle, Montana, since 1997. Mrs. Robinson has2009. He also served as the Board Presidentan alternate director of East TexasCentral Montana Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. in Nacogdoches, Texas since July 2002 andGreat Falls, Montana, from March 2018 to March 2021. Mr. McRae has served as a director of Northeast Texasthe Montana Electric Cooperative,Cooperatives’ Association, Inc. in Longview, TexasGreat Falls, Montana, since 1997. Mrs. Robinson is also2011 and has served as its board president since 2013. He has been a certified public accountant.self-employed rancher since 1989. As chief executive officer and general managera director of Wood CountyMcCone Electric Cooperative, Inc., Mrs. RobinsonMr. McRae has acquired extensive experience with and knowledge of the rural electric cooperative industry and, therefore, we believe Mrs. RobinsonMr. McRae has the qualifications, skills and experience necessary to act in the best interests of CFC and to serve as a director on the CFC board.


Mr. RodriguezMetcalf has been thepresident and CEO of Kay ElectricMid-Ohio Energy Cooperative Inc. in Blackwell, OklahomaKenton, Ohio, since 2014.2004. He has also served as COOa director and vice chairman of Kay Electric Cooperative from 2010 to 2014. Mr. RodriguezBuckeye Power Inc. in Columbus, Ohio, since 2004, and has been a CPAserved on its Audit Committee since 1998.2016. As the president and CEO of Kay ElectricMid-Ohio Energy Cooperative Inc., Mr. RodriguezMetcalf has acquired extensive experience with and knowledge of the rural electric cooperative industry and, therefore, we believe Mr. RodriguezMetcalf has the qualifications, skills and experience necessary to act in the best interests of CFC and to serve as a director on the CFC Board.board.


Mr. SchardinMontgomery has served asbeen general manager and CEO of SoutheasternFort Belknap Electric Cooperative, Inc. in Marion, South DakotaOlney, Texas, since 1990. He chaired the Managers Advisory Committee for his cooperative’s wholesale power supplier, East RiverAugust 2003. Additionally, Mr. Montgomery has been CEO of Fort Belknap Services Corporation, since August 2003, and CEO of Link Field Services, Inc. since August 2003, each subsidiaries of Fort Belknap Electric Cooperative, Inc. Mr. Montgomery has been an alternate director of Brazos Electric Power Cooperative, from January 2013 to 2015 and at the same time was a member of the Basin Electric Power Cooperative Managers Advisory Committee. Mr. SchardinInc. in Waco, Texas, since August 2003. He has also been a member ofCertified Public Accountant since 1988. As the South Dakota Rural Electric Association Strategic Issues Committee since 2005 and a director on the Rural Electric Economic Development Fund Board of Directors since 1996. As general manager and CEO of SoutheasternFort Belknap Electric Cooperative, Inc., Mr. SchardinMontgomery has acquired extensive experience with


and knowledge of the rural electric cooperative industry and, therefore, we believe Mr. SchardinMontgomery has the qualifications, skills and experience necessary to act in the best interests of CFC and to serve as a director on the CFC board.

Mr. Rehder has served as a director of North West Rural Electric Cooperative in Orange City, Iowa, since 2005, and has served as its board president since 2012. He has served as a director of Rivers Edge Bank, in Marion, South Dakota, since
162


2007. Since 2007, he has also served as a director of First State Associates, a bank holding company in Hawarden, Iowa, and has served as its chairman since 2012. Since 2010, he has served as president of Rehder Farms Inc. and director of 3R Feedlots Inc. in Hawarden, Iowa. As a director of North West Rural Electric Cooperative, Mr. Rehder has acquired extensive experience with and knowledge of the rural electric cooperative industry and, therefore, we believe Mr. Rehder has the qualifications, skills and experience necessary to act in the best interests of CFC and to serve as a director on the CFC board.


Mrs. Thompson Mr. Suggshas served as executive vice president and general manager of Pitt & Greene Electric Membership Cooperative in Farmville, North Carolina, since September 1983. Mr. Suggs has served as a director of North Carolina Electric Membership Corporation in Raleigh, North Carolina, since 1984 and served as its president from 2015 to 2017. He has also served as a director of North Carolina Association of Electric Cooperatives in Raleigh, North Carolina, since 1984 and served as its president from 2010 to 2011. Additionally, Mr. Suggs has served as a director of Tarheel Electric Membership Association in Raleigh, North Carolina, since 1984. As executive vice president and general manager of Pitt & Greene Electric Membership Cooperative, Mr. Suggs has acquired extensive experience with and knowledge of the rural electric cooperative industry and, therefore, we believe Mr. Suggs has the qualifications, skills and experience necessary to act in the best interests of CFC and to serve as a director on the CFC board.

Mrs. Thompson has served as a director of Trico Electric Cooperative in Mariana, Arizona, since 2001, and has served as secretaryvice president of theits board since 2015.2019. Mrs. Thompson also serves as a member of Trico Electric Cooperative’s Audit and Finance Committee and served as its chair from 2013 until 2015. Additionally, Mrs. Thompson has been a director of Grand Canyon State Electric Cooperative Association since 2002 and served as its Board Presidentboard president from 2008 to 2010. As secretaryvice president of the board and a director of Trico Electric Cooperative, Mrs. Thompson has acquired extensive experience with and knowledge of the rural electric cooperative industry and, therefore, we believe Mrs. Thompson has the qualifications, skills and experience necessary to act in the best interests of CFC and to serve as a director on the CFC board.


Mr. VailWattles has served as directorbeen president and chief executive officer of NineStar ConnectMonroe County Electric Cooperative in Greenfield, IndianaWaterloo, Illinois, since 1999. Mr. Vail2002. He has also served as the board chairman of NineStar Connect from 2012 to 2016 and has served as its board vice-chairman since April 2019. Since 2011, he also has served asbeen a board member of the Indiana Statewide AssociationSouthern Illinois Power Cooperative since 2002. As president and chief executive officer of RuralMonroe County Electric Cooperatives.Cooperative, Mr. Vail has been the owner of ETL Group since 2011. The ETL Group provides strategic and operational efficiency consulting services to business entities and non-profit organizations. Mr. Vail has held various positions at the Hancock Regional Hospital, and he was the senior special accounts loan officer at Farm Credit Services. He has been a member of Hancock Redevelopment Commission since 2010. As a former board chairman and current vice-chairman of NineStar Connect, Mr. VailWattles has acquired extensive experience with and knowledge of the rural electric cooperative industry. We,industry and, therefore, we believe Mr. VailWattles has the qualifications, skills and experience necessary to act in the best interests of CFC and to serve as a director on the CFC board.


Mr. Vitosh has been general manager and CEO of Norris Public Power District in Beatrice, Nebraska since 2012. From 2008 to 2012, Mr. Vitosh was the Manager of Finance and Accounting at Norris Public Power District. Mr. Vitosh is a CPA and is a member of the Nebraska Society of Certified Public Accountants. Mr. Vitosh has also been a self-employed farmer since 2004. As general manager and CEO of Norris Public Power District, Mr. Vitosh has acquired extensive experience with and knowledge of the rural electric cooperative industry and, therefore, we believe Mr. Vitosh has the qualifications, skills and experience necessary to act in the best interests of CFC and to serve as a director on the CFC board. We believe Mr. Vitosh’s experience with accounting principles, financial reporting rules and regulations and evaluating financial results makes him qualified to serve as the Chairman of CFC’s Audit Committee.Executive Officers


Mr. Ware has been president and CEO of Licking Rural Electrification-The Energy Cooperative in Newark, Ohio since 2012. Mr. Ware was the vice president and CFO of Licking Rural Electrification-The Energy Cooperative from 2000 until 2011. In May 2019 Mr. Ware was elected as a director of Farmer Mac, a federally chartered and publicly traded corporation that provides a secondary market for a variety of loans made to borrowers in rural America, where he serves on the Audit and Enterprise Risk Committees. He has served as a director of Licking County United Way and Genesis Healthcare Foundation from 2009 to 2018. He also served as a director of Altheirs Oil Inc. since 2005, the cooperative’s wholesale power supplier, Buckeye Power Cooperative, since 2012, and The Ohio State University-Newark Advisory Board since 2016 where he currently serves as vice-chairman. He is also a member of the Buckeye Power Cooperative Executive and Rate Committees and the American Gas Association Leadership Council. As president and CEO of Licking Rural Electrification-The Energy Cooperative, Mr. Ware has acquired extensive experience with and knowledge of the rural electric cooperative industry and, therefore, we believe Mr. Ware has the qualifications, skills and experience necessary to act in the best interests of CFC and to serve as a director on the CFC board.

Mr. Williams has been the general manager and executive vice president of Appalachian Electric Cooperative in New Market, Tennessee since 2010. He served as a board member of the East Tennessee Economic Development Agency from 2010 to 2018 and has served as a board member of the Northeast Tennessee Valley Industrial Development Association since 2010. He also served as chairman of the board of the Tennessee Valley Public Power Association from 2015-2017. As general manager and executive vice president of Appalachian Electric Cooperative, Mr. Williams has acquired extensive experience with and knowledge of the rural electric cooperative industry and, therefore, we believe Mr. Williams has the qualifications, skills and experience necessary to act in the best interests of CFC and to serve as a director on the CFC board.

Mr. Wynn has been president and CEO of Roanoke Electric Membership Corporation in Aulander, North Carolina since 1997. He has been a director on the NRECA Board of Directors since 2007, and has served as NRECA board president since March 2019. Mr. Wynn also served as NRECA vice president from 2017 to 2019. Mr. Wynn has also served as a director of the North Carolina Electric Membership Corporation and the North Carolina Association of Electric Cooperatives since


1997. As president and CEO of Roanoke Electric Membership Corporation and director of NRECA, Mr. Wynn has acquired extensive experience with and knowledge of the rural electric cooperative industry and, therefore, we believe Mr. Wynn has the qualifications, skills and experience necessary to act in the best interests of CFC and to serve as a director on the CFC board.

Mr. Petersen joined CFC in August 1983 as an area representative. He became the director of Policy Development and Internal Audit in January 1990, director of Credit Analysis in November 1990 and corporate secretary on June 1, 1992. He became assistant to the governor on May 1, 1993. He became assistant to the governor and acting administrative officer on June 1, 1994. He became governor and CEO on March 1, 1995. Mr. Petersen began his career in the rural electrification program in 1976 as staff assistant for Nishnabotna Rural Electric Cooperative in Harlan, Iowa. He later served as general manager of Rock County Electric Cooperative Association in Janesville, Wisconsin.

Mr. Don joined CFC in September 1999 as Director of Loan Syndications and became Vice President of Capital Market Relations in June 2005. EffectiveIn June 2010, Mr. Don becamewas named CFC’s Senior Vice President and Treasurer. EffectiveTreasurer, and on July 1, 2013, Mr. Donhe became CFC’s Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Effective May 3, 2021, Mr. Don assumed the position of Chief Executive Officer. Prior to joining CFC, he held the position of Vice President and Manager of the Washington, D.C. Office for The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi. Mr. Don started his banking career with the Bank of Montreal in New York in 1984 and subsequently was a Vice President for Corporate Banking for The Bank of New York from 1987 to 1990.


Ms. ClendenenWang joined CFC in 1982. Throughout1999. During her career with CFC,22-year tenure, Ms. ClendenenWang has held various positions. Shepositions within the Company’s finance department. Ms. Wang was named Vice President, Capital Markets in June 2017 after having served as Vice President, Human Resources until FebruaryCapital Markets Relations since June 2012. In February 2012, she became Vice President, Human Resources & Corporate Services until April 2014.  In April 2014, she became Senior Vice President, Corporate Services. Effective December 17, 2018,May 3, 2021, Ms. ClendenenWang became Senior Vice President and Chief AdministrativeFinancial Officer.


Mr. Allenjoined CFC in 1990. Throughout his career with CFC, Mr. Allen has held various positions. He served as a Director, Portfolio Management through 2010 and as Vice President, Portfolio Management from 2010 until April 2014, when he became Senior Vice President, Member Services.


Ms. Aronsonjoined CFC in 1995. She served as Vice President and Deputy General Counsel until June 2013. Effective July 1, 2013, Ms. Aronson became Senior Vice President and General Counsel. Prior to joining CFC, Ms. Aronson was a partner at the law firm of Thompson Hine LLP. Ms. Aronson retired from CFC March 31, 2022.


Mr. BorakHoward joined CFC in June 20022014 as Corporate Counsel in the Legal Services Group. He became Senior Corporate Counsel in 2015 and Assistant General Counsel in December 2020. Effective April 25, 2022, Mr. Howard became Senior Vice
163


President Credit Risk Management. Previously, he was with Fleet National Bank, Boston, Massachusetts,and General Counsel. Prior to joining CFC, Mr. Howard spent over 10 years as an associate at three large law firms in New York and Washington, D.C. and three years as in-house counsel, including serving as Vice President and General Counsel for Greentech Automotive, a start-up electric vehicle manufacturer, from 1992June 2011 to 2001 where he was a senior credit officer with risk management and loan approval responsibility for several industry banking portfolios including investor-owned utilities. Prior assignments at Fleet in Hartford, Connecticut, included Manager of Credit Review and Manager of Loan Workout.February 2013.


Mr. Captain joined CFC in 1999. He served as Vice President, Government Relations until 2010 when he became Vice President, Corporate Communications. In January 2014, Mr. Captain served as Vice President, Corporate Relations until April 2014 when he became Senior Vice President, Corporate Relations. Effective April 16, 2014,June 1, 2021, Mr. Captain became Senior Vice President and Chief Corporate Relations.Affairs Officer. Prior to joining CFC, he worked as a Special Assistant to the Undersecretary of Rural Development at the United StatesU.S. Department of Agriculture.


Mr. KettlerSaleh first joined CFC in August 1997 in the Treasury and Finance Group. He became the Director of Risk Management before leaving in November 2005 to pursue a career as aDirector of Asset-Liability Management at CapitalSource Inc., followed by an appointment as Director and Financial Industry Fellow at the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority in Washington, D.C., in October 2009. Mr. Saleh went abroad in December 2010 to focus on international banking examination, financial industry regulation and domestic and regional vice presidentfinancial stability prior to returning to CFC in 2001. In 2010, he becameSeptember 2016 as Vice President Portfolioof Financial Risk Management. On April 16, 2014,Effective June 1, 2021, Mr. KettlerSaleh was named Senior Vice President and Chief Risk Officer.

Mr. Bradbury joined CFC in May 2001. He served as Vice President, Internal Audit until June 2021, when he became Senior Vice President, Strategic Business DevelopmentCorporate Services. Effective August 1, 2022, Mr. Bradbury was named Senior Vice President and Support. Effective July 6, 2015,Chief Operating Officer. Prior to working at CFC, Mr. Kettler becameBradbury was an Internal Audit Services Manager at PricewaterhouseCoopers from June 1998 to May 2001.

Mr. Snowden joined CFC in April 2022 as Senior Vice President, Strategic Services.

Ms. Reed joined CFC in 1987. She served as Vice President, Portfolio Management from 2002 until 2014. On April 16, 2014, Ms. Reed became Senior Vice President, Member Services. Effective September 14, 2015, Ms. Reed became Senior Vice President, Loan Operations.

Mr. Starheim joined CFC as Senior Vice President, Business and Industry Development on July 6, 2015. Prior to joiningworking at CFC, Mr. StarheimSnowden served as CEO and General Manager of Delaware CountyCimarron Electric Cooperative in upstate New YorkKingfisher, Oklahoma, since 2009. He began his career with the cooperative in 1998 in the Member Services department. Mr. Snowden served as a director on the Oklahoma
Association of Electric Cooperatives board from 2001 until 2012.2009 to 2022, where he chaired the Legislative Committee. In addition, he is a member of the Oklahoma Association of Electric Cooperatives Managers Association, where he served as a past chairman. From 2012 until joining CFC, Mr. Starheim held2009 to 2022, he served as an alternate director on the positionboard of PresidentWestern Farmers Electric Cooperative, and CEOwas an active member of Kenergy Corp in Henderson, Kentucky.the Western Farmers Electric Cooperative Managers Group, serving as a past chairman.




(f) Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings


None to our knowledge.


(g) Promoters and Control Persons


Not applicable.


(h) Code of Ethics


We have adopted a Code of Ethics within the meaning of Item 406(b) of Regulation S-K. This Code of Ethics applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer. This Code of Ethics is publicly available on our website at www.nrucfc.coop (under the link “Investor Relations/Corporate Governance”).


(i) Nominating Committee


Our board of directors does not have a standing nominating committee. As described above under “Item 10(a) Directors,” 20 of our directors are each elected by members in the district for which the director serves. To nominate director candidates, at the district meeting before the meeting at which candidates are to be elected from such district, a nominating committee is elected composed of one person from each state within the district. Each member of thethese nominating committeecommittees must be a trustee, director or manager of one of our members. Each district nominating committee then submits the names of two or more nominees for each position in the district for which an election is to be held. We provide members of the nominating committeecommittees with director guidelines to use in reviewing applications from potential candidates. One or more candidates for the at-large director position who satisfies the requirements of an Audit Committeeaudit committee financial expert are nominated by our
164


board of directors if the board determines that it is appropriate to fill the seat. Our board of directors believes that it is appropriate for the full board of directors to nominate this director because of the position’s specific qualification requirements and the lack of any local district qualification requirement.


While we do not have a formal policy regarding diversity, the director guidelines we provide to each district nominating committee specify that a variety of perspectives, opinions and backgrounds is critical to the board’s ability to perform its duties and various roles. We recognize the value of having a board that encompasses a broad range of skills, expertise, industry knowledge and diversity of professional and personal experience.


(j) Audit Committee


Our Audit Committee currently consists of 12 directors: Mr. VitoshMrs. Hampton (Chairperson), Mr. WilliamsEldridge (Vice Chairperson), Mr. FarmerVitosh (Ex Officio), Mr. Bender, Mr. Christensen, Mr. Felkel, Mrs. Hampton, Mr. Hayes,Heinen, Mr. Janorschke,Anthony Larson, Mr. Norton,Shane Larson, Mr. Tesch,McRae, Mr. VailMontgomery and Mr. Ware.Suggs. Mrs. Hampton was designated by the board as the “Audit Committeean “audit committee financial expert” as defined by Section 407 of the Sarbanes-OxleySarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The members of the Audit Committee are “independent” as that term is defined in Rule 10A-3 under the Securities Exchange Act. Among other things, the Audit Committee reviews our financial statements and the disclosure under “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. The Audit Committee meets with our independent registered public accounting firm, internal auditors, CEO and financial management executives to review the scope and results of audits and recommendations made by those persons with respect to internal and external accounting controls and specific accounting and financial reporting issues and to assess corporate risk. The board has adopted a written charter for the Audit Committee that may be found on our website, www.nrucfc.coop (under the link “Investor Relations/Corporate Governance”).


The Audit Committee completed its review and discussions with management regarding our audited financial statements for the year ended May 31, 2019.2022. The Audit Committee has discussed with the independent auditors the matters required to be discussed by Auditing Standard No. 1301, and received from the independent accountants written disclosures and the letter from the independent accountant required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and discussed with the accountants their independence.




Based on the review and discussions noted above, the Audit Committee recommended to the board that the audited financial statements be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended May 31, 20192022 for filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.


(k) Compensation Committee


Role of the Compensation Committee


Our Compensation Committee currently consists of seven directors: Mr. Farmer,Felkel, Mr. Tesch,Fulk, Mr. Wattles,Janorschke, Mrs. Hampton, Mr. Vitosh, Mrs. Thompson,Norton, Mr. FelkelSuggs and Mr. Schardin.Vitosh. The Compensation Committee of the board of directors reviews and makes appropriate recommendations to the full board of directors regarding CFC’s total compensation philosophy and pay components, including, but not limited to, base and incentive pay programs. The Compensation Committee is also responsible for approving the compensation, employment agreements and perquisites for the CEO. The Compensation Committee annually reviews all approved corporate goals and objectives relevant to compensation, evaluates performance in light of those goals and approves the CEO’s compensation based on this evaluation, all of which is then submitted to the full board of directors for ratification. The Compensation Committee has delegated authority to the CEO for evaluating the performance and approving the annual base compensation for all of the other named executive officers as identified in the “Summary Compensation Table” below. Other than the CEO, no other named executive officer makes decisions regarding executive compensation.


The Compensation Committee reports to the board of directors on its actions and recommendations following committee meetings and meets in executive session without members of management present when making specific compensation decisions. Although the board has delegated authority to the Compensation Committee with respect to CFC’s executive and
165


general employee compensation programs and practices, the full board of directors also reviews and ratifies CFC’s compensation and benefit programs each year.


The Compensation Committee’s charter can be found on our website at www.nrucfc.coop (under the link “Investor Relations/Corporate Governance”).


The Compensation Committee’s Processes


The Compensation Committee has established a process to assist it in ensuring that CFC’s executive compensation program is achieving its objectives. Prior to the start of each fiscal year, the board of directors approves performance measures for the “corporate balanced scorecard,“Corporate Balanced Scorecard,” which is the basis for the short-term incentive plan, and the specific goal and metrics for the long-term incentive plan. The Compensation Committee reviews and assesses the accomplishment of goals as of the end of the fiscal year and determines whether to authorize the payment of incentive compensation. This authorization is then submitted to the full board of directors for ratification.


The CFC Board of Directors adopted a new CEO performance evaluation process in fiscal year 2022. Each board member was provided an opportunity to rate the CEO’s performance and provide feedback on competencies to include strategy, people, external stakeholders and leadership. The President, Vice President and Secretary-Treasurer of the board of directors meet annually with the CEO to review his performance based on histhe board assessment as well as individual achievements, contribution to CFC’s performance and other leadership accomplishments. In determining Mr. Petersen’sthe CEO’s base pay, the Compensation Committee subjectively considers the results of the board performance assessment as well as a variety of corporate performance measures, including financial metrics, portfolio management, customer satisfaction and market share, industry leadership, and peer group compensation data provided by the compensation consultant, as discussed below.


Role of Compensation Consultant


In fiscal year 2019,2022, the Compensation Committee hired Mercer (US) Inc. (“Mercer US”) to advise it on the CEO’s compensation as compared with the compensation of CEOs of peer group organizations. Through discussions with the Compensation Committee, Mercer US established a peer group of companies to use in assessing the competitiveness of the CEO’s compensation (see “Compensation Analysis” in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section below). Mercer US advised the Compensation Committee through an assessment of compensation data from this peer group using a one-year compensation analysis, which assesses CFC’s CEO compensation and the compensation of peer CEOs for the most recent fiscal year. The elements of compensation reviewed include current base pay, target and actual annual incentives, actual long termlong-term incentive granted as well as long termlong-term incentive payouts, and total direct compensation. Mercer US did not determine or provide the Compensation Committee with a specific recommendation on any component of executive


compensation; it only reviewed benchmark data and discussed what is generally occurring with executive compensation. During fiscal year 2022, Mercer US did not provide any other serviceprovided the Company services with respect to CFC ingeneral compensation data and benefit administration. The decision to engage Mercer US was made by management and approved by the Compensation Committee. The aggregate fees paid to Mercer US for executive compensation services to the Compensation Committee during fiscal year 2019.2022 were $70,000 and the aggregate fees paid to Mercer US for services to the Company with respect to general compensation data and benefit administration during fiscal year 2022 were $228,905.


In fiscal year 2019,2022, the Compensation Committee conducted an evaluation of Mercer US’ independence considering the relevant regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange, and concluded that the services performed by Mercer US raised no conflicts of interest. The Company does not believe that such additional services impair Mercer’s ability to provide independent advice to the Compensation Committee or otherwise present a conflict of interest.


Role of Executive Officers


As described above, the Compensation Committee has delegated the authority for making base pay decisions for the other named executive officers to the CEO. The CEO exercises his judgment to set base pay rates, based on general market data, overall corporate performance and leadership accomplishments. For additional information about the CEO’s role in compensation decisions, see “Base Pay” under the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section below.


166


(l) Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance


Not applicable.


(m) Board Leadership Structure and Role of Risk Oversight by the Board of Directors


Board Leadership Structure


The positions of CEO and president of the CFC Board of Directors are held by two separate individuals. The president must be a member of the board of directors and is elected annually by the board of directors. The president of the CFC Board of Directors has authority, among other things, to appoint members of the board to standing committees, to appoint a vice chairperson to each board standing committee and to appoint members to ad-hoc board committees. The president of the board presides over board meetings, sets meeting agendas and determines materials to be distributed to the board. Accordingly, the board president has substantial ability to influence the direction of the board. CFC believes that separation of the positions of board president and CEO reinforces the independence of the board in its oversight of CFC’s business and affairs. CFC also believes that this leadership structure is appropriate in light of the cooperative nature of the organization.
The board of directors appoints the CEO. The CEO is not a member of the board of directors. If the CEO position becomes vacant, the Chief Administrative Officerboard of directors will appoint an interim CEO who will exercise the responsibilities of the CEO until a permanent or interim CEO is selected by the board of directors.


Board Role in Risk Oversight


The board of directors has primary responsibility for the oversight and strategic direction of risk management.CFC’s Enterprise Risk Management (“ERM”) framework. The board of directors has adopted a comprehensive risk managementrisk-management policy that describes the roles and responsibilities of the board and management within an established framework for identifying and managing risks. The board of directors reviews the risk managementrisk-management policy annually and updates it accordingly. The board of directors has also developed a risk managementrisk-management philosophy, which is reviewedperiodically assessed and, if appropriate, updated annually.updated. It states CFC’s set of shared beliefs and attitudes on how risk is considered from strategy development and implementation to our operations.


The board of directors has also establisheddirectors’ policy sets forth the primary objectives of CFC’s ERM, which are to implement a risk appetite statement that includesprocess by which all important risks are identified, measured, assessed, managed and monitored in a common understanding betweencomprehensive and effective manner; and to categorically group, inventory, analyze and oversee all relevant risks by way of a structured reporting and analytics framework for the board of directors and management regarding acceptable risks and risk tolerances underlying the execution of CFC’s strategy. The board of directors reviews the risk appetite on at least an annual basis. The risk appetite is also intended as a benchmark for discussing the implications of pursuing new strategies and business opportunities.senior management.


The board of directors has also approved and authorized an Enterprise Risk Management (“ERM”) program for CFC that providesERM framework is intended to provide a holistic view of key risks that may impact CFC’s strategic objectives. ERM provides CFC with a process that allows CFC to become more anticipatory and effective at evaluating and managing uncertainties.uncertainties, objectively and proactively. The ERM activities, which includeprocess is focused on categorically measuring and assessing key risks across three broad groupings of risk, surveys, risk assessments,namely credit risk; financial risk; and risk analyses, are executedoperational risk. The process of assessing key risks is actioned quarterly and within the context of CFC’s strategic objectives, mission, values, culture, risk managementconservative risk-management philosophy and established risk appetite.guidelines. The programframework provides a consistent approach for identifying CFC’s key risks and determining appropriate responses in light of the board of directors’ strategic objectives, risk appetite and tolerances. As part of the ERM program and theobjectives.

The board of directors’ strategic planning process, the board of


directors periodically participates in a risk assessment process in order to evaluate each risk identifiedreviews important trends and emerging developments across key risks as part of the ERM program on the basis of likelihoodassessed, measured and impact, and prioritize the risks in order to effectively manage CFC’s most critical risks. Management has primary responsibilityevaluated by management. The Chief Risk Officer is primarily accountable for the execution of the ERM programresponsibilities in accordance with established risk limits and guidelines where applicable and as established by corresponding risk owners and in alignment with the risk philosophy risk appetite and risk tolerances of the board of directors. Additionally, management is responsible for regularlyperiodically evaluating the ERM program,framework, making regular reports to the board of directors about its evaluation of the ERM program,framework, and proposing to the board of directors changes to the ERM programprocess to reflect financial industry best practices.practice.


In fulfilling its risk managementrisk-management oversight duties, the board of directors receives periodic reports on business activities and risk managementrisk-management activities from management, including but not limited to detailed risk assessment of (i) credit risk including analysis of CFC’s loan portfolio, counterparty credit risk exposure (e.g., derivatives counterparties) and the corporate investment portfolio; (ii) financial risk including analysis of liquidity and funding risk, capital management and leverage, financial performance and interest rate risk; and (iii) operational risk with analysis of cybersecurity, business
167


operations and information technology, compliance, reputational and talent management. The periodic reports to the board of directors from management also include reports from various operating groups (e.g., Member Relations, Treasury Operations, Internal Audit, Information Technology and Legal Services), and committees across the organization including the(e.g., Corporate Credit Risk Management, the Member Services, the Treasury, the Internal Audit, the Business and Technology Services and the Legal Services groups, as well as Corporate Compliance, theCommittee, Asset Liability Committee, the Corporate Credit Committee, the Investment Management Committee and the Disclosure Committee.Committee). Management provides reports to the board of directors at each regularly scheduled board meeting, and more frequently as requested by the board of directors, relating to, among other things, the ongoing progress of managing risk at CFC throughgiven the ERM program,framework, management’s responses for the critical business risks identified during eachthe risk assessment process and the status of any gaps or deficiencies, and CFC’s risk profile and trends, as well as emerging risks and opportunities.


The board of directors places particular emphasis on the oversight of cybersecurity risks. Each quarter, or more frequently as requested by the board of directors, management provides reports on CFC’s security operations, including any cybersecurity incidents, management’s efforts to manage any incidents, and any other information requested from management. On at least an annual basis, the board of directors reviews management reports concerning the disclosure controls and procedures in place to enable CFC to make accurate and timely disclosures about any material cybersecurity events. Additionally, upon the occurrence of a material cybersecurity incident, the board of directors will be notified of the event so it may properly evaluate such incident, including management’s remediation plan.


Item 11. Executive Compensation

Item 11.Executive Compensation


Compensation Discussion and Analysis


Executive Compensation Philosophy and Objectives


The components of our compensation package for the named executive officers (consisting of Messrs. Petersen,Mr. Don, Evans, Starheim,Ms. Wang, Mr. Allen, Ms. Aronson, Mr. Captain and Ms. Aronson)Mr. Saleh) are consistent with those offered to all employees. Mr. Evans is reported as a named executive officer, however he is deceased as of September 2, 2018.


Our executive compensation program provides a balanced mix of compensation that incorporates the following key components:
annual base pay;
an annual cash incentive that is based on the achievement of short-term (one-year) corporate goals;
a three-year cash incentive that is based on the achievement of long-term corporate goals; and
retirement, health and welfare and other benefit programs.


While all elements of executive compensation work together to provide a competitive compensation package, each element of compensation is determined independently of the other elements.


Our compensation philosophy is to provide a total compensation package for employees—base pay, short-term incentive, long-term incentive and benefits—that is competitive in the local employment market. However, due to the cooperative nature of the organization, CFC does not meet the total cash compensation levels of named executive officers of other financial services organizations since we do not offer stock or other equity compensation. It is important to CFC, however, to pay the named executive officers of CFC competitively in base pay to retain key talent.


Performance—Named executive officers receive base pay that is both market competitive and reflective of their role in developing, implementing and overseeing CFC’s strategy and operations. Other components of compensation—short-term and long-term incentives—reflect the performance of the organization and its success in achieving corporate performance metrics established by the board of directors.


Retention—CFC’s success is due in large part to the relationship between our employees and our members. This makes the retention of employees, including the named executive officers, vital to our business and long-term success. The compensation package, particularly the long-term incentive plan and the retirement benefits, assist in the retention of a highly qualified management team.


Compensation Analysis


In fiscal year 2019,2022, Mercer (US), Inc. (“Mercer US”) was engaged by the Compensation Committee to conduct a survey to provide compensation data for the CEO position using 1513 peer organizations identified by Mercer US through discussions with the Compensation Committee. Mercer US included companies in the peer group that were similar to CFC in asset size, industry and business description. The peer group included financial institutions that are private market, commercial and/or mission-driven lenders, offering full-service financing, investment and related services. The companies targeted as peer companies included two members of the Farm Credit systemSystem and 1311 regional banks and financial services companies. After

168


reviewing the activity of the peer group of the prior year, Signature Bank was removed from the peer group based on its asset size.

The peer group companies had assets ranging from approximately 50% to 200% of CFC’s May 31, 2018November 30, 2021 total assets of $26.7$30.0 billion, and included seveneight companies with greater total assets than CFC’s. The peer group consisted of financial services organizations New York Community Bancorp, Inc.; Signature Bank; Nelnet, Inc.; Webster Financial Corporation; Flagstar Bancorp, Inc.; People’s United Financial, Inc.; Bok Financial Corporation; Hancock Whitney Corporation; Onemain Holdings, Inc.; BankUnited, Inc.; Synovus Financial Corporation; TFS Financial Corporation; and Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation, as well as two Farm Credit System peers. Synovus Financial Corporation and BankUnited, Inc. were added to the peer group in fiscal year 2019, one to replace Nationstar Mortgage Holdings, Inc., which was removed due to its acquisition, and one in anticipation of a future merger.




Mercer US led the Compensation Committee through an assessment of CEO compensation data for the peer group companies. Mercer US’ data included both actual compensation and target compensation based on information obtained from each peer group company’s most recent annual report or proxy statement.

The elements of compensation reviewed include:
current base salary;
target and actual annual incentive paid in fiscal year 2018;2021;
actual long-term incentive granted, which includes restricted stock awards (valued at face value on the date of grant), stock option awards (valued at grant date utilizing the Black-Scholes option pricing model), other long-term incentive target awards (valued at target value on date of award) and cash long-term incentive payouts (valued at actual payout on date of award if target value is not disclosed);
sign-on awards, special awards and mega-grants annualized over the term of the employment contract or the vesting schedule; and
annualized value of retirement, perquisites and other noncash compensation.


The Compensation Committee reviewed total compensation data for the peer group for informational purposes and used this data solely to determine the competitiveness of our CEO base pay.


In determining the base compensation paid to our other named executive officers, the CEO reviewed national, credible third-party compensation surveys (including the Mercer US Executive and CompAnalyst surveys) for financial services and other organizations of similar asset size as CFC in order to obtain a general understanding of current compensation practices and to ensure that the base pay component of compensation for the named executive officers other than the CEO is competitive with such institutions. CFC has often recruited non-CEO talent from industries outside the financial services sector. As a result, the CEO considers data from surveys covering a larger and broader group of for-profit companies in setting compensation for the other named executive officers than the Compensation Committee considers in setting compensation for the CEO. The CEO considered the data to gain a general understanding of current compensation practices at institutions of similar asset size to CFC; he did not review or consider underlying data pertaining to individual organizations comprising any of the survey groups. Instead, the CEO considered the aggregate compensation data to enhance his understanding of current practices in setting compensation at competitive levels.


Elements of Compensation


Base Pay—Our philosophy is to provide annual base pay that reflects the value of the job in the marketplace, targeted at the 50th percentile. To attract and retain a highly skilled workforce, we must remain competitive with the pay of other employers that compete with us for talent.


After reviewing theMr. Don was named Chief Executive Officer on May 3, 2021 with a base salary of $1,000,000. Mr. Don’s performance of the organization and the evaluation of the CEO’s performancebase pay are reviewed by each board member, it was the assessment of the Compensation Committee thatat the CEOend of the fiscal year and the organization performed extremely well during this business year. In fact, the business results met or exceeded company targets for many key metrics of performance, and the CEO continuedchanges made to demonstrate outstanding leadership. Therefore, in recognition of his strong performance and leadership, the Committee increased the CEO’s base pay to $1,145,000
will be effective JanuaryJune 1, 2019.2022.


As discussed under “Compensation Analysis”above, Mr. Don, in his capacity as the CEO, exercised his judgment to set the annual base pay for the other named executive officers based on general market data, overall company performance and individual leadership accomplishments.


169


Mr. Don determined that Ms. Wang, Mr. Starheim,Allen, Ms. Aronson, Mr. Captain and Mr. AllenSaleh all performed well in their various roles as senior leaders of the organization. They each contributed to the achievement of corporate strategies and objectives in a positive and meaningful way that would typically warrant a merit-based increase in base pay. Ms. Wang did not receive any additional changes to her base pay and/or a one-time cash award.due to her recent change in role and salary at the beginning of the fiscal year. Mr. Allen, and Mr. Captain received a merit increase. Mr. Don, Mr. Starheimincrease and Ms. Aronson received a merit increase as well as a one-time cash award.lump sum bonus in recognition of her performance. Mr. Saleh became the Chief Risk Officer in June 2021 and Mr. Don exercised his judgement to set the annual base pay for Mr. Saleh. The merit increases and/or cash awards grantedand bonus are included in the total compensation table below.


Short-Term Incentive—Our short-term cash incentive program for fiscal year 2022 is a one-year cash incentive that is tied to the annual performance of the organization as a whole.organization. We believe that by paying a short-term incentive tied to the achievement of annual operating goals, all employees, including named executive officers, will focus their efforts on the most important strategic objectives that will help us fulfill our mission to our members and our obligations to the financial markets.


Additionally, the short-term incentive pay enhances our ability to provide competitive compensation while at the same time tying total compensation paid to the achievement of corporate goals. Every employee participates in the short-term incentive program, and the corporate strategic goals are the same for all employees, including the named executive officers. The short-term incentive program provides annual cash incentive opportunities based upon the level of the position within our base pay structure, ranging from 15% to 25% of base pay. Named executive officers are eligible to receive short-term cash incentive compensation up to 25% of their base pay. Over the last 10 years, the actual payout percentage has ranged from 52.5% to 100% of total opportunity, with an average over the 10 years of 83.88%87.75%. This equates to a 10-year average payout of 16.07%16.65% of base salaries for all employees.
Our approach to establishing corporate goals for short-term incentive compensation has not changed since the plan’s inception. Corporate performance is measured using a balanced scorecard approved by the board of directors prior to the start of the fiscal year. The balanced scorecard is a performance management tool that articulates the corporate strategy into specific, quantifiable and measurable goals. The goals have always been tied to enhancing service to our member-owners while ensuring all aspects of the business are effectively managed.


The scorecard is divided into four quadrants, reflecting crucial areas of business performance. Specific goals are established within those quadrants to focus all employees on the target results and measures that must be achieved if we are to succeed at realizing our strategic plan. The intent is to align organizational, departmental and individual initiatives to achieve a common set of goals.


The four quadrants for fiscal year 2019,2022, which were the basis for the short-term incentive payment, were the same as they have been in previous years: Customer Engagement;Member Portfolios; Financial Ratios; Internal ProcessProcess; and Operations; and Learning, Growth and Innovation.Member Engagement. For fiscal year 2019,2022, the board of directors established sixfive corporate goals within these four quadrants. The board of directors establishes corporate goals and measures they believe are challenging but achievable if each individual performs well in his or hertheir role and we meet our internal business plan goals.


The goals for fiscal year 20192022 were:
Member Engagement: One goal focusing on setting strategic initiatives to understand and provide our members with the best-in-class products and services.
Customer Engagement:Member Portfolio Management: Two goals supporting our efforts to maintain or increase market share of borrowers in key segments of the loan portfolio.
Internal Process and OperationsFinancial Ratio: One goal focused on managing CFC’s operating expense levels.
Financial Ratios: Two goals supporting efforts to meet or exceed established financial targets to maintain CFC’s financial strength.
Learning, Growth & InnovationInternal Process and Operations: One goal focused on the development of a program to assess the effectiveness ofmanaging CFC’s existing and new products and services.
operating expense levels.


The determination of the extent to which the sixfive goals were achieved and, therefore, the amount to be paid out under the short-term incentive plan for fiscal year 20192022 was confirmed by the board of directors with the filing of this Form 10-K.in July 2022. The board determined that fourfive goals were achieved at the target level.100%. Each goal may carrycarries a different weight varying between 10% and 20%30%, resulting in an aggregate payout of 52.5%100% of the total opportunity.


In addition to the Corporate Balanced Scorecard approach to the short-term incentive, an individual performance component is being added to the program effective with the plan for fiscal year 2023. This new annual incentive program will provide cash incentive opportunities based upon the level of the position within our base pay structure. Maximum opportunities will
170


range from 26% to 40% of base pay. Named executive officers will be eligible to receive annual cash incentive compensation up to 40% of their base pay. A portion of their earned incentive will be paid that fiscal year and a portion will vest after an additional two years of service.

Long-Term Incentive—The long-term incentive program is a three-year plan that is tied to CFC’s long-term strategic objectives. The long-term incentive program was implemented to create dynamic tension between short-term objectives and long-term goals. It is also an effective retention tool, helping us to keep key employees, and supports CFC’s efforts to compensate its employees at market-competitive levels.

All individuals employed by CFC on the first day of each fiscal year in which there is a long-term incentive plan in place, June 1, are eligible to participate in the program for the performance period beginning on that date. Under the long-term incentive program, performance units covering a three-year performance period are issued to each employee at the start of each fiscal year. The long-term incentive is paid out in one lump sumlump-sum cash payment after the end of the performance period, subject to approval by the board of directors and the continued employment (or retirement, disability or death) of the participant by CFC on the date of payment. We sometimes refer to each three-year performance period as a plan cycle.


The performance measure for the active long-term incentive plans is the achievement of bond rating targets for our issuer credit ratings as rated by S&P Global Inc., Fitch Ratings Inc. and Moody’s Investors Service rating agencies, as outlined in


each plan document. The value of the performance units will rangeranges from $0 to $150 per performance unit according to the level of CFC’s issuer credit ratings by the rating agencies. To achieve the highest value of $150, which exceeds the targeted value, the agencies defined in each plan would have to raise CFC’s issuer credit rating to AA (or the equivalent rating at Moody’s). To determine the payout value of performance units, the ratings by agencies identified in each plan are given a numerical value, i.e., 2 for A stable, 3 for A positive, etc. The ratings of these agencies are then averaged to achieve the final value of the performance units.


The number of performance units awarded to each employee for each plan cycle is calculated by dividing a percentage, ranging from 15% to 25%, of the participant’s base pay for the first fiscal year of the plan cycle by the payout value assigned to the target rating level. For the program cycle ending May 31, 2019,2022, the target rating level was “A+ Stable,” which was assigned a payout value of $100 per performance unit. For the named executive officers, the number of performance units awarded for that program cycle was based on 25% of each named executive officer’s base pay for fiscal year 2017,2020, the first year of the plan cycle. If the highest rating level was achieved at the end of that plan cycle, resulting in payout of $150 per performance unit, the long-term incentive pay for named executive officers would have been 37.5% of fiscal year 20172020 base pay.


The following table presents the potential payout values for performance units awarded for the program cyclecycles that endedend on May 31, 2019:2022, May 31, 2023 and May 31, 2024.


Issuer Credit Rating—Incentive-Performance Linkage
RatingAA+AA-
OutlookNegativeStablePositiveNegativeStablePositive 
Numerical Score123456 
Plan Payout Unit Value$20$40$60$60$100$120$150
Rating A A+ AA-
Outlook Negative Stable Positive Negative Stable Positive  
Numerical Score 1 2 3 4 5 6  
Plan Payout Unit Value $— $40 $60 $60 $100 $120 $150
____________________________
____________________________
* The target objective is in bold.


CFC uses our issuer credit rating as the performance measure for the long-term incentive plan because stronger ratings lead to lower interest cost and more reliable access to the capital markets. We also believe our long-term incentive measure will better align management’s interests with the interests of our members and investors. Since we have no publicly held equity securities and our objective is to offer our members cost-based financial products and services consistent with sound financial management rather than to maximize net income, more traditional performance measures such as net income or earnings per share would not be appropriate.


As of May 31, 2019,2022, there were three active long-term incentive plans in which named executive officers were participants. Performance units issued to all named executive officers in fiscal year 20172020 had a payout value based on our issuer credit ratings in place on May 31, 2019. Performance2022. Those ratings were at an average numerical level of one.
171


Coinciding with the implementation of the new annual incentive plan effective June 1, 2022, payout values for the performance units issued to all named executive officers in fiscal year 2018 willyears 2021 and 2022 have a payout value based on issuer credit ratings in place on May 31, 2020; and performance units issued to named executive officers in fiscal year 2019 will have a payout value based on issuer credit ratings in place on May 31, 2021.
Payments made to the named executive officers for fiscal year 2019 were for performance units issued in fiscal year 2017 and were based on the May 31, 2019 issuer credit rating level of A stable outlook, which has a value of $40been frozen at $20 per performance unit, or 40% of the targeted opportunity (10% of fiscal year 2017 base pay).

All currentunit. These plans will pay out ifon a quarterly basis during the three rating agencies rate our issuer credit rating at a high enough levelfiscal year in which they were originally eligible to receive a payout.pay out. The payoutlong-term incentive plan program will end effective May 21, 2022 and will be based onreplaced by the averagevesting component of the three ratings (averages are calculated and rounded down to the next whole number).new annual incentive plan.


Risk Assessment


The Compensation Committee conducts an annual risk assessment of the company’s compensation policies and practices, particularly the short-term and long-term incentive plan goals, to ensure that the policies and practices do not encourage excessive risk. For fiscal year 20192022 the Compensation Committee concluded that our compensation policies and practices are not reasonably likely to provide incentives for behavior that could have a material adverse effect on the company.




Benefits


An important retention tool is our defined benefit pension plan, the Retirement Security Plan. CFC participates in a multiple-employer pension plan managed by NRECA. We balance the effectiveness of this plan as a compensation and retention tool with the cost of the annual premium incurred to participate in this pension plan. The value of the pension benefit is determined by base pay only and does not include other cash compensation.


We also offerhave a Pension Restoration Plan (“PRP”) and an Executive Benefit Restoration Plan (“EBR”). The PRP is a plan for a select group of management, to increase their retirement benefits above amounts available under the Retirement Security Plan, which is restricted by Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) limitations on annual pay levels and maximum annual annuity benefits. The PRP restores the value of the Retirement Security Plan for named executive officers to the level it would be if the IRS limits on annual pay and annual annuity benefits were not in place. The PRP was frozen as of December 31, 2014.2014 and had one remaining participant in fiscal year 2022. We then established the EBR to provide a similar benefit to a select group of management. A named executive officer may participate in the PRP or the EBR. Unlike the Retirement Security Plan, the PRP and the EBR are unfunded, unsecured obligations of CFC and are not qualified for tax purposes. All sixFour of the named executive officers are participants in either the PRP or the EBR.


Under the PRP, we pay the amount owed to the named executive officers for the pension restoration benefit; amounts paid are then deducted from the premium due for the next Retirement Security Plan invoice(s) to NRECA. Under the EBR, we will also pay any amounts owed to the named executive officers for the restoration benefit once the risk of forfeiture has expired; amounts will be paid directly by CFC. We record an unfunded pension obligation and an offsetting adjustment to AOCI for this liability.


For more information on the Retirement Security Plan, the PRP and the EBR, see the “Pension Benefits Table” and accompanying narrative below.


As an additional retention tool designed to assist named executive officers in deferring compensation for use in retirement, each named executive officer is also eligible to participate in CFC’s nonqualified 457(b) deferred compensation savings plan. Contributions to this plan are limited by IRS regulations. The calendar year 20192022 cap for contributions is $19,000.$20,500. There is no CFC contribution to the deferred compensation plan. For more information see “Nonqualified Deferred Compensation” below.

The CEO is eligible to earn retirement benefits in addition to those credited under any of the above-mentioned plans in a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”). This plan is an ineligible deferred compensation plan within the meaning of section 457 of the Internal Revenue Code. The account is considered unfunded and may be credited from time to time pursuant to the plan at the discretion of the CFC Board of Directors. During fiscal year 2019, the CFC Board of Directors used its discretion and credited the account. According to the terms of the SERP, the CEO became fully vested and those benefits were paid in full. These payments are reflected in the Summary Compensation Table below.


Other Compensation


We provide named executive officers with other benefits, as reflected in the All Other Compensation column in the “Summary Compensation Table” below, that we believe are reasonable and consistent with our compensation philosophy. We do not provide significant perquisites or personal benefits to the named executive officers.


The Compensation Committee considers perquisites for the CEO in connection with its annual review of the CEO’s total compensation package described above. The perquisites provided to Mr. PetersenDon are limited to an annual automobile allowance and an annual spousal air travel allowance to permit Mr. Petersen’sDon’s spouse to accompany him on business travel, and home security.travel. To provide the automobile and spousal travel perquisites in an efficient fashion, the board of directors authorizes an annual allowance rather than providing unlimited reimbursement or use of a company-owned vehicle. The amount of each allowance is authorized
172


annually by the board of directors and is determined based on the estimated cost for operation and maintenance of an automobile and the anticipated cost of air travel by the CEO’s spouse. For 2019,2022, the board of directors authorized an aggregate of $30,000$25,000 to cover these two allowances. We provide security for Mr. Petersen, including security in addition to that provided at business facilities. We believe that all company-incurred security costs are reasonable and necessary and for the company’s benefit.



Severance/Change-in-Control Agreements


Mr. Petersen, CEO,Don has an executive agreement with CFC under which he may continue to receive compensation and benefits in certain circumstances after resignation or termination of employment. The value of Mr. Petersen’shis severance package was determined to be appropriate for a CEO and approved by the Compensation Committee as part of his employment contract. No other named executive officers have termination or change-in-control agreements. For more information on thisthese severance arrangement,arrangements, see “Termination of Employment and Change-in-Control Arrangements” below.


Compensation Committee Report


The Compensation Committee of the board of directors oversees CFC’s compensation program on behalf of the board. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Compensation Committee reviewed and discussed with management the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” set forth in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Based on this review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to the board of directors that the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” be included in this Form 10-K.


Submitted by the Compensation Committee:
Kent D. Farmer
David E. Felkel
Dennis R. Fulk
Bradley J. SchardinP. Janorschke
Dean R. TeschBarbara E. Hampton
Marsha L. ThompsonG. Anthony Norton
Mark A. Suggs
Bruce A. Vitosh
Alan W. Wattles









Summary Compensation Table


The summary compensation table below sets forth the aggregate compensation for the fiscal years ended May 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021 and 20172020 earned by the named executive officers.
173


Name and Principal Position Year Salary 
Bonus(1)
 
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation(2)
 
Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings (3)
 
All Other
Compensation(4)
 TotalName and Principal PositionYearSalary
Bonus(1)
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation(2)
Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings (3)
All Other
Compensation(4)
Total
Sheldon C. Petersen 2019 $1,118,750
 $
 $246,293
 $415,728
 $40,870
 $1,821,641
J. Andrew DonJ. Andrew Don2022$1,000,000 $ $274,680 $938,523 $33,580 $2,246,783 
Chief Executive 2018 1,062,171
 
 363,015
 636,443
 46,532
 2,108,161
Chief Executive2021560,166 — 156,500 624,196 8,241 1,349,103 
Officer 2017 1,017,563
 
 275,172
 443,017
 42,747
 1,778,499
Officer2020493,500 155,015 648,386 7,296 1,304,197 
           

J. Andrew Don 2019 470,000
 10,000
 105,688
 49,564
 8,125
 643,377
Yu Ling WangYu Ling Wang2022400,000  112,700 122,940 11,263 646,903 
Senior Vice President 2018 455,000
 10,000
 156,270
 314,276
 8,025
 943,571
Senior Vice President2021278,285 — 66,150 272,437 8,033 624,905 
and Chief Financial 2017 440,000
 5,000
 119,500
 288,597
 7,925
 861,022
and Chief Financial
Officer           

Officer
           

John T. Evans(5)
 2019 550,000
 
 60,019
 
 156,682
 766,701
Executive Vice 2018 550,000
 15,000
 191,020
 191,083
 5,400
 952,503
President and Chief 2017 550,000
 15,000
 149,750
 160,950
 5,425
 881,125
Operating Officer           

Joel AllenJoel Allen2022462,000  135,300 262,385 8,983 868,668 
Senior Vice President,Senior Vice President,2021420,000 — 117,750 709,253 8,400 1,255,403 
Member ServicesMember Services2020396,000 — 122,383 788,933 7,400 1,314,716 
           

Gregory J. Starheim(5)
 2019 459,750
 10,000
 101,454
 113,379
 8,292
 692,875
Brad CaptainBrad Captain2022426,000  124,000 226,343 6,258 782,601 
Senior Vice President, 2018 435,000
 
 148,520
 333,817
 8,254
 925,591
Senior Vice President,
Business and Industry 2017 410,000
 10,000
 92,250
 337,809
 44,370
 894,429
Development           

and Chief Corporateand Chief Corporate
Affairs OfficerAffairs Officer
           

Roberta B. Aronson 2019 406,250
 10,000
 90,794
 114,130
 5,646
 626,820
Gholam M. SalehGholam M. Saleh2022385,000  109,570 71,783 10,485 576,838 
Senior Vice PresidentSenior Vice President
and Chief Risk Officerand Chief Risk Officer
Roberta B. Aronson(5)
Roberta B. Aronson(5)
2022398,333 15,000 120,391  74,525 608,249 
Senior Vice President 2018 392,500
 
 134,125
 320,023
 5,546
 852,194
Senior Vice President2021478,000 — 133,645 — 5,925 617,570 
and General Counsel 2017 375,000
 3,600
 101,495
 262,477
 5,425
 747,997
and General Counsel2020451,000 — 139,306 591,013 5,942 1,187,261 
            
Joel Allen 2019 360,000
 
 80,490
 5,218
 9,125
 454,833
Senior Vice President            
of Member Services            
____________________________
(1) Includes amounts given as one-time cash awards in lieu of or in addition to base pay increases. Details for 20192022 can be found in “Elements of Compensation” in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” above.
(2) Includes amounts earned during each respective fiscal year and payable as of May 31 under the long-term and short-term incentive plans. For a discussion of the long-term and short-term incentive plans, see “Elements of Compensation” in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” above. The amounts earned by each named executive officer under these incentive plans are listed above.
(3) Represents the aggregate change in the actuarial present value of the accumulated pension benefit under NRECA Retirement Security Plan, the multiple-employer defined benefit pension plan in which CFC participates, during each respective fiscal year as calculated by NRECA. For Mr. Petersen,Ms. Aronson’s change in fiscal years 2017, 2018 and 2019 this also includes a payment from the SERP. For a discussion of the SERP, see “Benefits” in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” above.
(4) For Mr. Petersenpension value was negative for fiscal year 2019,2022 and is not included in total compensation.
(4) For Mr. Don for fiscal year 2022, includes (i) perquisites comprising Mr. Petersen’sDon’s automobile allowance and his spousal air travel allowance, and (ii) $3,770 representing the approximate aggregate incremental cost to the company for maintaining security arrangements for Mr. Petersen in addition to security arrangements provided at the headquarters facility. We do not believe this provides a personal benefit (other than the intended security) nor do we view these security arrangements as compensation to the individual. We report these security arrangements as perquisites as required under applicable SEC rules.allowance. The annual automobile allowance is calculated based on estimated costs associated with maintenance, use and insurance of a personal automobile. The annual spousal travel allowance is calculated based on the anticipated air travel for Mrs. PetersenMiss Nickodem (Mr. Don’s spouse) during the fiscal year. For Mr. Evans for fiscal year 2019, the amount represents a payout for an accrued and unused annual leave balance at the time of his death. The remaining amounts included in this column represent CFC contributions on behalf of each named executive officer pursuant to the CFC 401(k) defined contribution plan and contributions to health savings accounts.
(5)Mr. Evans is deceased as of September 2, 2018 and Mr. Starheim began employment on July 6, 2015.Ms. Aronson retired March 31, 2022.











174


The following chart has the amounts paid to each named executive officer under the short-term and long-term incentive plans for the preceding three years.

NameYearShort-Term
Incentive Plan
Long-Term
Incentive Plan
J. Andrew Don2022$250,000 $24,680 
2021133,000 23,500 
2020109,495 45,520 
Yu Ling Wang2022100,000 12,700 
202154,150 12,000 
Joel Allen2022115,500 19,800 
202199,750 18,000 
202087,863 34,520 
Brad Captain2022106,500 17,500 
Gholam M. Saleh202296,250 13,320 
Roberta B. Aronson202299,185 21,206 
2021113,525 20,120 
2020100,066 39,240 
Name Year 
Short-Term
Incentive Plan
 
Long-Term
Incentive Plan
Sheldon C. Petersen 2019 $145,773
 $100,520
  2018 265,495
 97,520
  2017 228,932
 46,240
       
J. Andrew Don 2019 61,688
 44,000
  2018 113,750
 42,520
  2017 99,000
 20,500
       
John T. Evans 2019 18,769
 41,250
  2018 137,500
 53,520
  2017 123,750
 26,000
       
Gregory J. Starheim 2019 60,454
 41,000
  2018 108,750
 39,770
  2017 92,250
 
       
Roberta B. Aronson 2019 53,274
 37,520
  2018 98,125
 36,000
  2017 84,375
 17,120
       
Joel Allen 2019 47,250
 33,240


Grants of Plan-Based Awards


We have a long-term and a short-term incentive plan for all employees, under which the named executive officers may receive a cash incentive up to 37.5% and 25% of salary, respectively. The incentive payouts are based on the executive officer’s salary for the fiscal year in which the program becomes effective. See the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” above for further information on these incentive plans.


The following table contains the estimated possible payouts under our short-term incentive plan and possible future payouts for grants issued under our long-term incentive plan during the year ended May 31, 2019.


2022.
175


 
Estimated Future Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards
Estimated Future Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards
Name Grant Date Threshold Target MaximumNameGrant DateTargetMaximum
Estimated Actual (1)
Sheldon C. Petersen      
Long-Term Incentive Plan (1)
 June 1, 2018 $
 $275,000
 $412,500
J. Andrew DonJ. Andrew Don
Long-Term Incentive Plan Long-Term Incentive PlanJune 1, 2020$130,800 $196,200 $26,160 
Long-Term Incentive Plan Long-Term Incentive PlanJune 1, 2021250,000 375,000 50,000 
Short-Term Incentive Plan (2)
 
 286,250
 286,250
Short-Term Incentive Plan (2)
250,000 250,000 250,000 
J. Andrew Don      
Long-Term Incentive Plan (1)
 June 1, 2018 
 117,500
 176,250
Yu Ling WangYu Ling Wang
Long-Term Incentive Plan Long-Term Incentive PlanJune 1, 202067,000 100,500 13,400 
Long-Term Incentive Plan Long-Term Incentive PlanJune 1, 2021100,000 150,000 20,000 
Short-Term Incentive Plan (2)
 
 117,500
 117,500
Short-Term Incentive Plan (2)
100,000 100,000 100,000 
John T. Evans      
Long-Term Incentive Plan (1)
 June 1, 2018 
 137,500
 206,250
Joel AllenJoel Allen
Long-Term Incentive Plan Long-Term Incentive PlanJune 1, 2020105,000 157,500 21,000 
Long-Term Incentive Plan Long-Term Incentive PlanJune 1, 2021115,500 157,500 23,100 
Short-Term Incentive Plan (2)
 
 137,500
 137,500
Short-Term Incentive Plan (2)
115,500 115,500 115,500 
Gregory J. Starheim      
Long-Term Incentive Plan (1)
 June 1, 2018 
 112,400
 168,600
Brad CaptainBrad Captain
Long-Term Incentive Plan Long-Term Incentive PlanJune 1, 202092,700 139,050 18,540 
Long-Term Incentive Plan Long-Term Incentive PlanJune 1, 2021106,500 159,750 21,300 
Short-Term Incentive Plan (2)
Short-Term Incentive Plan (2)
106,500 106,500 106,500 
Gholam M. SalehGholam M. Saleh
Long-Term Incentive Plan Long-Term Incentive PlanJune 1, 202068,200 102,300 13,640 
Long-Term Incentive Plan Long-Term Incentive PlanJune 1, 202196,300 144,450 19,260 
Short-Term Incentive Plan (2)
 
 117,500
 117,500
Short-Term Incentive Plan (2)
96,250 96,250 96,250 
Roberta B. Aronson      Roberta B. Aronson
Long-Term Incentive Plan (1)
 June 1, 2018 
 100,600
 150,900
Long-Term Incentive Plan Long-Term Incentive PlanJune 1, 2020119,500 179,250 23,900 
Long-Term Incentive Plan Long-Term Incentive PlanJune 1, 2021119,500 179,250 23,900 
Short-Term Incentive Plan (2)
 
 102,500
 102,500
Short-Term Incentive Plan (2)
119,500 119,500 99,185 
Joel Allen      
Long-Term Incentive Plan (1)
 June 1, 2018 
 90,000
 135,000
Short-Term Incentive Plan (2)
 
 90,000
 90,000
___________________________
(1) Target payouts are calculated using unit values of $100 based on our goal of achieving an average long-term senior secured credit rating of A+ stable as of May 31, 2021.the end of the respective fiscal years. These Long-Term Incentive Plans were frozen at a unit value of $20 and will be paid out at that value in the respective years in which they are due based on the plan documents. Estimated actual payouts are calculated based on this value. See the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” above for further information on these incentive plans.
(2) Target and maximum payouts represent 25% of May 31, 20192022 base salary. For the payout earned under the fiscal year 2019 short-term incentive plan,2022 Short-Term Incentive Plan, see the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column of the “Summary Compensation Table” above.

The board of directors approved a new long-term incentive plan with grants of performance units effective June 1, 2019.  The performance units will be calculated and issued to the named executive officers in August 2019.  The payout under these grants will be determined(3) Ms. Aronson’s Short-Term Incentive payment is prorated for actual time worked. She retired on MayMarch 31, 2022.


Employment Contracts


Pursuant to an employment agreement effective as of January 1, 2015,executed on March 20, 2021, CFC employs Mr. PetersenDon as Chief Executive Officer on a year to year basis,effective May 3, 2021 until May 31, 2024 unless extended as provided by the terms of the contract or unless otherwise terminated in accordance with the terms of the Agreement. The amended Agreement provides that CFC shall pay Mr. PetersenDon a base salary at an annual rate of not less than $975,000$1,000,000 per annum plus such incentive payments (if any) as may be awarded him.In addition, pursuant to the Agreement, Mr. PetersenDon is entitled to certain payments in the event of his termination other than for cause (e.g., Mr. PetersenDon leaving for good reason, disability or termination due to death). See “Termination of Employment and Change-in-Control Arrangements” below for a description of these provisions and for information on these amounts.


Pension Benefits Table


CFC is a participant in a multiple-employer defined benefit pension plan, the Retirement Security Plan, which is administered by NRECA. Since this plan is a multiple-employer plan in which CFC participates, CFC is not liable for the amounts shown in the table below and such amounts are not reflected in CFC’s audited financial statements. CFC’s expense is limited to the annual premium to participate in the Retirement Security Plan. There is no funding liability for CFC for this plan.

176


The Retirement Security Plan is a qualified plan in which all employees are eligible to participate upon completion of one year of service. Each of the named executive officers participates in the qualified pension plan component of the Retirement Security Plan. CFC reduced the value of the pension plan effective September 1, 2010. Under the current pension plan, participants are entitled to receive annually, under a 50% joint and surviving spouse annuity, 1.70% of the average of their five highest base salaries during their participation in the Retirement Security Plan, multiplied by the number of years of


participation in the plan. The value of the pension benefit is determined by base pay only and does not include other cash compensation. Normal retirement age under the qualified pension plan is age 65; however, the plan does allow for early retirement with reduced benefits beginning at age 55. For early retirement, the pension benefit will be reduced by 1/15 for each of the first five years and 1/30 for each of the next five years by which the elected early retirement date precedes the normal retirement date. Benefits accrued prior to September 1, 2010, are based on a benefit level of 1.9%1.90% of the average of their five highest base salaries during their participation in the Retirement Security Plan and a normal retirement age of 62.


CFC also offers a PRP and an EBR. EachFour of the named executive officers participatesparticipate in either the PRP or the EBR. The purpose of these plansthis plan is to increase the retirement benefits above amounts available under the Retirement Security Plan, which is restricted by IRS limitations on annual pay levels and maximum annual annuity benefits. The PRP and the EBR restorerestores the value of the Retirement Security Plan for each officerthe participating officers to the level it would be if the IRS limits on annual pay and annual annuity benefits were not in place.


The benefit and payout formula under these restoration plans is similar to that under the qualified Retirement Security Plan. However, twoTwo of the named executive officers have satisfiedreached their vesting date in accordance with provisions of the provisions established to receive the benefit from the PRP. They were grandfathered in the plan andEBR plan. As a result, they no longer have a risk of forfeiture of the benefit under the PRP.EBR plan. Distributions are made from the planthese plans to each of those named executive officers annually. The details of theses distributions are shown in the Pension Benefits table below.

In addition, the CEO is eligible for benefits under the SERP. This plan is an ineligible deferred compensation plan within the meaning of section 457 of the Internal Revenue Code. The account is considered unfunded and may be credited from time to time pursuant to the plan at the discretion of the CFC Board of Directors. During fiscal year 2019, the CFC Board of Directors used its discretion and credited the account. According to the terms of the SERP, the CEO became fully vested and those benefits totaling $67,141 were paid in full during fiscal year 2019, as presented in the table below.


The following table contains the years of service, the present value of the accumulated benefit for the named executive officers listed in the “Summary Compensation Table” as of May 31, 2019,2022, as calculated by NRECA and distributions from the plans for the fiscal year then ended.
NamePlan Name
Number of Years
of Credited Service (1)
Present Value of
Accumulated Benefit (2)
Payments During Last
Fiscal Year(3)
J. Andrew DonNRECA Retirement Security Plan21.66 $2,854,365 $1,437,198 
Yu Ling WangNRECA Retirement Security Plan20.66 1,154,256 — 
Joel AllenNRECA Retirement Security Plan30.66 3,591,774 — 
Brad CaptainNRECA Retirement Security Plan21.33 1,926,325 — 
Gholam M. SalehNRECA Retirement Security Plan5.75 71,783 — 
Roberta B. AronsonNRECA Retirement Security Plan— — 333,048 
Name Plan Name 
Number of Years
of Credited Service (1)
 
Present Value of
Accumulated Benefit (2)
 
Payments During Last
Fiscal Year(3)
Sheldon C. Petersen (4)
 NRECA Retirement Security Plan 9.33
 $698,389
 $325,683
  SERP 
 
 67,141
J. Andrew Don NRECA Retirement Security Plan 18.66
 2,080,458
 
John T. Evans (3)
 NRECA Retirement Security Plan 
 
 684,532
Gregory J. Starheim NRECA Retirement Security Plan 13.25
 1,253,229
 
Roberta B. Aronson NRECA Retirement Security Plan 22.83
 1,919,408
 
Joel Allen NRECA Retirement Security Plan 27.66
 1,831,203
 
___________________________
___________________________
(1) CFC is a participant in a multiple-employer pension plan. Credited years of service, therefore, includes not only years of service with CFC, but also years of service with another cooperative participant in the multiple-employer pension plan. All other named executive officers except for Mr. Starheim, have credited years of service only with CFC.
(2) Amount represents the actuarial present value of the named executive officer’s accumulated benefit under this plan as of May 31, 2019,2022, as provided by the plan administrator, NRECA, using interest rates ranging from 1.50%1.94% to 4.88%3.09% per annum and mortality according to tables prescribed by the IRS as published in Revenue Rulings 2001-62 and 2007-67.
(3) Distributions during fiscal year 20192022 were as a result of named executive officers no longer being at risk of forfeiture with respect to these amounts provided under the PRP.EBR plan for Mr. Don,Don. Ms. Aronson received distributions due to her vesting and retirement on March 31, 2022. Mr. Starheim,Captain and Mr. Allen and Ms. Aronson continue to have a risk of forfeiture of the benefits under the EBR; therefore, no payments have been made. Mr. Evans’ distributions were as a result of his death on September 2, 2018.
(4) The NRECA Pension Plan allows active employees who have reached normal retirement age to cash in their lump-sum benefit accrued through August 31, 2010, or “quasi-retire.” Due to the quasi-retirements of Mr. Petersen in February 2015 his credited years of service was reduced and he received 12 months of credited service in January of each year thereafter.







Nonqualified Deferred Compensation


The CFC deferred compensation plan is a nonqualified deferred compensation savings program for the senior executive group, including each of the named executive officers, and other select management or highly compensated employees designated by CFC. Participants may elect to defer up to the lesser of 100% of their compensation for the year or the applicable IRS statutory dollar limit in effect for that calendar year. The calendar year 20192022 cap for contributions is $19,000.$20,500. During the three plan years immediately prior to the date a participant attains normal retirement age, participants may be eligible for a statutory catch-up provision that allows them to defer more than the annual contribution limit. Compensation
177


for the purpose of this plan is defined as the total amount of compensation, including incentive pay, if any, paid by CFC. CFC does not make any contributions to this plan.


The accounts are credited with “earnings” based on the participants’ selection of available investment options (currently, eightnine options) within the Homestead Funds. When a participant ceases to be an employee for any reason, distribution of the account will generally be made in 15 substantially equal annual payments beginning approximately 60 days after termination (unless an election is made to change the form and timing of the payout). The participant may elect either a single lump sum or substantially equal annual installments paid over no less than two and no more than 14 years. The amount paid is based on the accumulated value of the account.


The following table summarizes information related to the nonqualified deferred compensation plan in which the named executive officers listed in the “Summary Compensation Table” were eligible to participate during the fiscal year ended May 31, 2019.2022.
Name
Executive
Contributions
in Last
Fiscal Year (1)
Registrant
Contributions
in Last
Fiscal Year
Aggregate
Earnings in Last
Fiscal Year
Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
Aggregate
Balance at Last
Fiscal Year-End
J. Andrew Don$49,500 $— $(19,382)$— $174,368 
Yu Ling Wang19,500 — — 19,503 
Joel Allen— — — — — 
Brad Captain19,500 — (119,482)— 1,006,835 
Gholam M. Saleh— — — — — 
Roberta B. Aronson15,417 — (13,935)— 212,207 
Name
Executive
Contributions
in Last
Fiscal Year (1)
 
Registrant
Contributions
in Last
Fiscal Year
Aggregate
Earnings in Last
Fiscal Year
Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
Aggregate
Balance at Last
Fiscal Year End
Sheldon C. Petersen $18,708
 $
 $34,597
 $
 $850,802
J. Andrew Don 18,500
 
 1,054
 
 58,762
John T. Evans 
 4,625
 
 14,104
 (464,860) 
Gregory J. Starheim 18,708
 
 (2,888) 
 219,325
Roberta B. Aronson 18,500
 
 2,722
 
 127,249
Joel Allen 
 
 
 
 
___________________________
___________________________
(1)Executive contributions are also included in the fiscal year 20192021 Salary column in the “Summary Compensation Table” above.

Termination of Employment and Change-in-Control Arrangements


Mr. PetersenDon has an executive agreement with CFC under which he may continue to receive base salary and benefits in certain circumstances after resignation or termination of employment. No other named executive officers have termination or change-in-control agreements.


Mr. PetersenDon


Under the executive agreement with Mr. Petersen,Don, if CFC terminates his employment without “cause,”“cause” or Mr. PetersenDon terminates his employment for “good reason” (each term as defined below), CFC is obligated to pay him, a lump-sum paymentin substantially equal monthly installments over the 12-month period following the termination of employment, an amount equal to the product of threetwo times the sum of (i) his annual base salary at the rate in effect at the time of termination and his(ii) the short-term incentive bonus,earned if any, for the previous year. year prior to the year in which such termination occurs.

Assuming a triggering event on May 31, 2019,2022, the compensation payable to Mr. PetersenDon for termination without cause would be $4,235,250.$2,500,000. The actual payments due on a termination without cause on different dates could materially differ from this estimate.


For purposes of Mr. Petersen’sDon’s executive agreement, “cause” generally means (i) the willful and continued failure by Mr. PetersenDon to perform his duties under the agreement or comply with written policies of CFC, (ii) willful conduct materially injurious to CFC or (iii) conviction of a felony involving moral turpitude. “Good reason” generally means (i) a reduction in the rate of Mr. Petersen’sDon’s base salary, (ii) a decrease in his titles, duties or responsibilities, or the assignment of new responsibilities which, in either case, is materially less favorable to Mr. PetersenDon when compared with his titles, duties and


responsibilities that were in effect immediately prior to such assignment or (iii) the relocation of CFC’s principal office or the relocation of Mr. PetersenDon to a location more than 50 miles from the principal office of CFC.


178


This estimate does not include amounts to which the named executive officer would be entitled to upon termination, such as base salary to date, unpaid bonuses earned, unreimbursed expenses, paid vacation time and any other earned benefits under company plans.


Chief Executive Officer Pay Ratio


The fiscal year 20192022 compensation ratio of the median annual total compensation of all of our employees to the annual total compensation of our Chief Executive Officer is as follows:
Category and RatioTotal Compensation
Median annual total compensation of all employees (excluding Chief Executive Officer)$170,740 
Annual total compensation of J. Andrew Don, Chief Executive Officer2,246,783 
Ratio of the median annual total compensation of all employees to the annual total compensation of J. Andrew Don, Chief Executive Officer13.59:1.0
Category and Ratio Total Compensation
Median annual total compensation of all employees (excluding Chief Executive Officer) $123,915
Annual total compensation of Sheldon C. Petersen, Chief Executive Officer 1,821,641
Ratio of the median annual total compensation of all employees to the annual total compensation of Sheldon C. Petersen, Chief Executive Officer 14.70:1.0


In determining the median employee, a listing was prepared of all active employees of CFC as of March 29, 2019.31, 2022. We did not make any assumptions, adjustments or estimates with respect to total compensation. We did not annualize the compensation for any part-time employees or those who were not employed by us for the full 10-month portion of the fiscal year. We determined the compensation of our median employee by (i) taking the total gross compensation earned fiscal year-to-date for all active employees as of March 29, 2019,31, 2022 and (ii) ranking the total gross compensation of all employees, except the Chief Executive Officer, from lowest to highest.


After identifying the median employee, we calculated annual total compensation for such employee using the same methodology we use for our named executive officers as set forth in the above Summary Compensation Table.


Director Compensation Table


Directors receive an annual fee for their service on the CFC board. Additionally, the directors receive reimbursement for reasonable travel expenses. The fee is paid on a monthly basis and reimbursement for travel expenses is paid following the conclusion of each board meeting.


The following chart summarizes






















179


Below is a summary of the total compensation earned by each of CFC’s directors during the fiscal year ended May 31, 2019.2022.



NameTotal Fees Earned
Alan W. Wattles$70,000
Anthony A. Anderson60,000
Anthony Larson65,000
G. Anthony Norton65,000
Barbara E. Hampton65,000
Bradley P. Janorschke60,000
Brent McRae60,000
Bruce A. Vitosh70,000
Chris D. Christensen60,000
David E. Felkel70,000
Dennis Fulk65,000
Jared Echternach60,000
Jeffrey Allen Rehder60,000
John Metcalf60,000
Kendall Montgomery60,000
Kevin M. Bender60,000
Mark A. Suggs60,000
Marsha L. Thompson60,000
Michael J. Heinen60,000
Robert Brockman60,000
Thomas A. Bailey60,000
Timothy Eldridge60,000
William Keith Hayward60,000
Name Total Fees Earned
Alan Wattles $56,500
Barbara Hampton 13,750
Bradley J. Schardin 55,000
Bradley P. Janorschke 13,750
Bruce A. Vitosh 55,000
Chris Christensen 13,750
Curtin Rakestraw 41,250
Curtis Wynn 55,000
David Felkel 55,000
Dean Tesch 61,000
Debra Robinson 55,000
Dennis Fulk 13,750
Gordon Anthony Norton 13,750
Gregory Williams 55,000
Harry N. Park 45,750
Jay Hanson 55,000
Jimmy LaFoy 55,000
Kent Farmer 61,000
Marsha L. Thompson 55,000
Patrick Bridges 41,250
Philip Carson 41,250
Robert Brockman 55,000
Robert Hill 41,250
Roman Gillen 41,250
Stephen Vail 55,000
Thomas Bailey 13,750
Thomas Hayes 55,000
Timothy Rodriguez 55,000
Todd Ware 55,000


Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation


During the year ended May 31, 2019, thereThere were no compensation committee interlocks or insider participation related to executive compensation.compensation during the fiscal year ended May 31, 2022.



Item 12.    Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters


Not applicable.


Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

Item 13.    Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

Review and Approval of Transactions with Related Persons


Our board of directors has established a written policy governing related-person transactions. The policy covers transactions between CFC, on the one hand, and its directors, executive officers or key employees and their immediate family members and entities of which any of our directors, executive officers or key employees (i) is an officer, director, trustee, alternative director or trustee or employee, (ii) control,controls or (iii) havehas a substantial interest. Under this policy, a related personrelated-person transaction is any transaction in excess of $120,000 in which CFC was, is or is proposed to be a direct or indirect participant in which a


related person had, has or will have a direct or indirect material interest in the transaction. Related personRelated-person transactions do not include compensation or expense reimbursement arrangements with directors, officers or key employees (notwithstanding that officer compensation may be disclosed in “Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, elsewhere in the CFC’s periodic reports filed with the SEC or otherwise disclosed publicly as a related personrelated-person transaction), transactions where the related person’s interest arises only from the person’s position as a director of another entity that is a party to the transaction, and transactions deemed to be related credits. Related-person transactions are subject to review by the general counsel, or in some cases,Executive Committee of the board of directors (excluding
180


(excluding any interested director), based on whether the transaction is fair and reasonable to CFC and consistent with the best interests of CFC.CFC and its members.


Related credits are extensions of credit to, or for the benefit of, related persons and entities that are made on substantially the same terms as, and follow underwriting procedures that are no less stringent than, those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions generally offered by CFC. Related credits are not subject to the procedures for transactions with related persons because we were established for the very purpose of extending financing to our members. We, therefore, enter into loan and guarantee transactions with members of which our officers and directors are officers, directors, trustees, alternative directors or trustees, or employees in the ordinary course of our business. All related credits are reviewed from time to time by our internal Corporate Credit Committee, which monitors our extensions of credit, and our independent third-party reviewer, which reviews our credit extensioncredit-extension policies on an annual basis. All loans, including related credits, are approved in accordance with an internal credit approval matrix, with each level of risk or exposure potentially escalating the required approval from our lending staff to management, a credit committee or the board of directors. Related credits of $250,000 or less are generally approved by our lending staff or internal Corporate Credit Committee. Any related credit in excess of $250,000 requires approval by the full board of directors, except that any interested directors may not participate, directly or indirectly, in the credit approval process, and the CEO has the authority to approve emergency lines of credit and certain other loans and lines of credit. Notwithstanding the related-person transaction policy, the CEO will extend such loans and lines of credit in qualifying situations to a member of which a CFC director was a director or officer, provided that all such credits are underwritten in accordance with prevailing standards and terms. Such situations are typically weather related and must meet specific qualifying criteria. To ensure compliance with this policy, no related persons may be present in person or by teleconference while a related credit is being considered. Under no circumstances may we extend credit to a related person or any other person in the form of a personal loan.


As a cooperative, CFC was established for the very purpose of extending financing to its members, from which our directors must be drawn. Loans and guarantees to member systems of which directors of CFC are officers, directors, trustees, alternative directors or trustees, or employees, are made in the ordinary course of CFC business on the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with other members and that do not involve more than normal risk of uncollectibility or present other unfavorable features. It is anticipated that, consistent with its loan and guarantee policies in effect from time to time, additional loans and guarantees will be made by CFC to member systems and trade and service organizations of which directors of CFC or their immediate family members (i) are officers, directors, trustees, alternative directors or trustees or employees, (ii) control or (iii) have a substantial beneficial interest. CFC has adopted a policy whereby substantially all extensions of credit to such entities are approved only by the disinterested directors.





Related-Person Transactions


The following table contains the total compensation earned by CFC’s executive officers during the year ended May 31, 20192022 who are not named executive officers but meet the definition of a “related person” as described above. Total compensation disclosed below is made up of the same components included in the “Summary Compensation Table” under “Item 11. Executive Compensation.”
181


Name and Principal Position Total Compensation
Graceann D. Clendenen  
Senior Vice President & Chief Administrative Officer $629,920
   
Steven M. Kettler  
Senior Vice President, Strategic Services 474,591
   
John M. Borak  
Senior Vice President, Credit Risk Management 401,234
   
Robin C. Reed  
Senior Vice President, Loan Operations 370,742
   
Brad L. Captain  
Senior Vice President, Corporate Relations 353,117
Name and Principal PositionTotal Compensation
Gary Bradbury
Senior Vice President, Corporate Services$526,126
Nathan Howard
Senior Vice President and General Counsel355,694
Mark Snowden
Senior Vice President, Strategic Services216,635
Graceann Clendenen
Senior Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer289,209
John M. Borak
Senior Vice President, Credit Risk Management379,575


Independence Determinations


The board of directors has determined the independence of each director based on a review by the full board. The Audit Committee is subject to the independence requirements of Rule 10A-3 under the Securities Exchange Act. To evaluate the independence of our directors, the board has voluntarily adopted categorical independence standards consistent with the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) standards. However, because we only list debt securities on the NYSE, we are not subject to most of the corporate governance listing standards of the NYSE, including the independence requirements.


No director is considered independent unless the board has affirmatively determined that he or she has no material relationship with CFC, either directly or as a partner, shareholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with CFC. Material relationships can include banking, legal, accounting, charitable and familial relationships, among others. In addition, a director is not considered independent if any of the following relationships existed:
(i)the director is, or has been within the last three years, an employee of CFC or an immediate family member is, or has been within the last three years, an executive officer of CFC;
(ii)the director has received, or has an immediate family member who has received, during any 12-month period within the last three years, more than $120,000 in direct compensation from CFC, other than director and committee fees and pension or other forms of deferred compensation for prior service (provided that such compensation is not contingent in any way on continued service);
(iii)(a) the director or an immediate family member is a current partner of a firm that is CFC’s internal or external auditor; (b) the director is a current employee of such a firm; (c) the director has an immediate family member who is a current employee of such a firm and personally works on CFC’s audit; or (d) the director or an immediate family member was within the last three years (but is no longer) a partner or employee of such a firm and personally worked on CFC’s audit within that time;
(iv)the director or an immediate family member is, or has been within the last three years, employed as an executive officer of another company where any of CFC’s present executive officers at the same time serves or served on that company’s compensation committee; or
(v)the director is a current employee, or an immediate family member is a current executive officer, of a company that has made payments to, or received payments from, CFC for property or services in an amount which, in any of the last three fiscal years, exceeds the greater of $1 million, or 2% of such other company’s consolidated gross revenue.



(i)the director is, or has been within the last three years, an employee of CFC or an immediate family member is, or has been within the last three years, an executive officer of CFC;

(ii)the director has received, or has an immediate family member who has received, during any 12-month period within the last three years, more than $120,000 in direct compensation from CFC, other than director and committee fees and pension or other forms of deferred compensation for prior service (provided that such compensation is not contingent in any way on continued service);
(iii)(a) the director or an immediate family member is a current partner of a firm that is CFC’s internal or external auditor; (b) the director is a current employee of such a firm; (c) the director has an immediate family member who is a current employee of such a firm and personally works on CFC’s audit; or (d) the director or an immediate family member was within the last three years (but is no longer) a partner or employee of such a firm and personally worked on CFC’s audit within that time;
(iv)the director or an immediate family member is, or has been within the last three years, employed as an executive officer of another company where any of CFC’s present executive officers at the same time serves or served on that company’s compensation committee; or
(v)the director is a current employee, or an immediate family member is a current executive officer, of a company that has made payments to, or received payments from, CFC for property or services in an amount which, in any of the last three fiscal years, exceeds the greater of $1 million, or 2% of such other company’s consolidated gross revenue.

The board of directors also reviewed directors’ responses to a questionnaire asking about their relationships with CFC and its affiliates (and those of their immediate family members) and other potential conflicts of interest.


Based on the criteria above, the board of directors has determined that the directors listed below are independent for the period of time served by such directors during fiscal year 2019.2022. The board determined that none of the directors listed below
182


had any of the relationships listed in (i)—(v) above or any other material relationship that would compromise their independence.
Independent Directors
Thomas A. Bailey
Patrick L. Bridges(1)
Kevin M. Bender
Robert Brockman
Chris D. ChristensenJared EchternachTimothy Eldridge
David E. FelkelDennis FulkBarbara E. Hampton
Philip A. Carson (1) 
Chris D. ChristensenKent D. Farmer
David E. FelkelDennis Fulk        Barbara E. Hampton
Doyle Jay HansonThomas L. Hayes   (1)
Robert M. HillJimmy A. LaFoy(1)
Anthony Larson
Brent McRaeJohn MetcalfKendall Montgomery
G. Anthony NortonJeffrey Allen Rehder
Bradley J. Schardin(1)
JimmyMark A. LaFoy  SuggsG. Anthony NortonMarsha L. Thompson
Harry N. Park (1)
Bruce A. Vitosh
____________________________
Curtin R. Rakestraw II(1)
Bradley J. Schardin    Dean R. Tesch
Marsha L. Thompson Stephen C. Vail      Bruce A. Vitosh
Gregory D. Williams Curtis Wynn
____________________________
(1) This director served during fiscal year 2019;2022; however, he was no longer a director as of May 31, 2019.June 14, 2021.


Item 14.Principal Accounting Fees and Services

Item 14.    Principal Accounting Fees and Services

CFC’s Audit Committee is solely responsible for the nomination, approval, compensation, evaluation and discharge of the independent public accountants. The independent registered public accountants report directly to the Audit Committee, and the Audit Committee is responsible for the resolution of disagreements between management and the independent registered public accountants. Consistent with U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission requirements, the Audit Committee has adopted a policy to pre-approve all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by the independent registered public accountants, provided such services do not impair the independent public accountant’s independence.


KPMG, LLP was our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal years ended May 31, 20192022 and 2018.2021. KPMG, LLP has advised the Audit Committee that they are independent accountants with respect to the Company, within the meaning of standards established by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and federal securities laws administered by the SEC.U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The following table displays the aggregate estimated or actual fees for professional services provided by KPMG, LLP in fiscal years 20192022 and 2018,2021, including fees for the 20192022 and 20182021 audits. All services for fiscal years 20192022 and 20182021 were pre-approved by the Audit Committee.

 May 31,Year Ended May 31,
(Dollars in thousands) 2019 2018(Dollars in thousands)20222021
Description of fees:    Description of fees:
Audit fees(1)
 $1,589
 $1,540
Audit fees(1)
$1,811 $1,861 
Tax fees(2)
 13
 15
Tax fees(2)
27 22 
All other fees(3)
 11
 11
All other fees(3)
12 55 
Total $1,613
 $1,566
Total$1,850 $1,938 
____________________________
(1) Audit fees for fiscal years 20192022 and 20182021 consist of fees for the quarterly reviews of our interim financial information and the audit of our annual consolidated financial statements and fees for the preparation of the stand-alone financial statements for RTFC and NCSC. Audit fees for fiscal years 20192022 and 20182021 also include comfort letter fees and consents related to debt issuances and compliance work required by the independent auditors.
(2) Tax fees consist of assistance with matters related to tax compliance and consulting.
(3) All other fees for fiscal years 20192022 and 20182021 consist of fees for certain agreed-upon procedures.


183


PART IV


Item 15. Exhibits,Exhibit and Financial Statement Schedules

(a)Financial Statement Schedules
The following documents are filed as part of this Report in Part II, Item 8 and are incorporated herein by reference.
1. Consolidated Financial StatementsPage
2. Schedules
2. Schedules
None.
(b)Exhibits
An Exhibit Index has been filed as part of this Form 10-K and is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 16. Form 10-K Summary
Not applicable.



EXHIBIT INDEX

The following exhibits are incorporated by reference or filed herewith.

Exhibit No.(b)DescriptionExhibits
3.1
The following exhibits are incorporated by reference or filed herewith.

184


EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit No.Description
3.1
3.2
4.1*4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
4.7
4.8
4.9
4.10
10.1^
10.2^
10.3^
10.4^
10.5^
10.6^
10.610.7
10.710.8
10.810.9


10.10
Exhibit No.Description
10.9
185


10.10Exhibit No.Description
10.11
10.1110.12
10.1210.13
10.1310.14
10.1410.15
10.16
10.17
10.18
10.19
10.1510.20
10.1610.21
10.1710.22
10.1810.23
10.1910.24
10.2010.25
10.2110.26
10.2210.27
10.2310.28
10.2410.29
186


10.25Exhibit No.Description
10.30
10.2610.31


10.32
Exhibit No.Description
10.27
10.2810.33
10.2910.34
10.3010.35
10.3110.36
10.3210.37
10.3310.38
10.3410.39
10.3510.40
10.3610.41
10.3710.42
10.3810.43
10.44
10.45
10.46
10.47
10.48
187


Exhibit No.Description
10.49
10.3910.50
10.4010.51
10.4110.52
10.4210.53
10.4310.54
10.55*
10.56
10.4410.57


10.58
Exhibit No.Description
10.45
10.46
10.47
Registrant agrees to furnish to the Securities and Exchange Commission a copy of all other instruments defining the rights of holders of its long-term debt upon request.
23.1*
31.1*
31.2*
32.1†
32.2†
101.INS*Inline XBRL Instance Document.Document - the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.
101.SCH*XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
101.CAL*XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document.
101.LAB*XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document.
101.PRE*XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document
101.DEF*XBRL Taxonomy Definition Linkbase Document
104.00Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101)
___________________________
*Indicates a document being filed with this Report.
^Identifies a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
Indicates a document that is furnished with this Report, which shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that Section.



188


Item 16. Form 10-K Summary

None.
189


SIGNATURES




Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the County of Loudoun, Commonwealth of Virginia, on the 31st8th day of July 2019.August 2022.


NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE
FINANCE CORPORATION
By:/s/  SHELDON C. PETERSENJ. ANDREW DON
Sheldon C. PetersenJ. Andrew Don
Chief Executive Officer









































190


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.



SignatureTitleDate
/s/ J. ANDREW DONChief Executive OfficerAugust 8, 2022
J. Andrew Don
/s/ YU LING WANGSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)August 8, 2022
Yu Ling Wang
SignatureTitleDate
/s/  SHELDON C. PETERSENBRUCE A. VITOSHChief Executive OfficerJuly 31, 2019
Sheldon C. Petersen
/s/  J. ANDREW DONSenior Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerJuly 31, 2019
J. Andrew Don
/s/  ROBERT E. GEIERVice President and ControllerJuly 31, 2019
Robert E. Geier
/s/  KENT D. FARMERPresident and DirectorJuly 31, 2019August 8, 2022
Kent D. FarmerBruce A. Vitosh
/s/  DEAN R. TESCHDAVID E. FELKELVice President and DirectorJuly 31, 2019August 8, 2022
Dean R. TeschDavid E. Felkel
/s/  ALAN W. WATTLESG. ANTHONY NORTONSecretary-Treasurer and DirectorJuly 31, 2019August 8, 2022
Alan W. WattlesG. Anthony Norton
/s/ CHARLES A. ABEL IIDirectorAugust 8, 2022
Charles A. Abel II
/s/  ANTHONY A. ANDERSONDirectorAugust 8, 2022
Anthony A. Anderson
/s/  THOMAS A. BAILEYDirectorJuly 31, 2019August 8, 2022
Thomas A. Bailey
/s/  ROBERT BROCKMANDirectorJuly 31, 2019August 8, 2022
Robert BrockmanKevin M. Bender
/s/  CHRIS D. CHRISTENSENDirectorJuly 31, 2019August 8, 2022
Chris D. Christensen
/s/  DAVID E. FELKEL JARED ECHTERNACHDirectorJuly 31, 2019August 8, 2022
David E. FelkelJared Echternach
/s/  TIMOTHY ELDRIDGEDirectorAugust 8, 2022
Timothy Eldridge
/s/  DENNIS FULKDirectorJuly 31, 2019August 8, 2022
Dennis Fulk
191


/s/ BARBARA E. HAMPTONDirectorJuly 31, 2019August 8, 2022
Barbara E. Hampton
/s/  DOYLE JAY HANSONDirectorJuly 31, 2019
Doyle Jay Hanson
/s/  THOMAS L. HAYESDirectorJuly 31, 2019
Thomas L. Hayes


/s/  WILLIAM KEITH HAYWARDDirectorAugust 8, 2022
William Keith Hayward
/s/  MICHAEL HEINENDirectorAugust 8, 2022
Michael Heinen
/s/  BRADLEY P. JANORSCHKEDirectorJuly 31, 2019August 8, 2022
Bradley P. Janorschke
/s/  JIMMY A. LAFOYANTHONY LARSONDirectorJuly 31, 2019August 8, 2022
Jimmy A. LaFoyAnthony Larson
/s/  G. ANTHONY NORTONSHANE LARSONDirectorJuly 31, 2019August 8, 2022
G. Anthony NortonShane Larson
/s/  DEBRA L. ROBINSONBRENT MCRAEDirectorJuly 31, 2019August 8, 2022
Debra L. RobinsonBrent McRae
/s/  TIMOTHY RODRIGUEZJOHN METCALFDirectorJuly 31, 2019August 8, 2022
Timothy RodriguezJohn Metcalf
/s/  BRADLEY J. SCHARDINKENDALL MONTGOMERYDirectorJuly 31, 2019August 8, 2022
Bradley J. SchardinKendall Montgomery
/s/  JEFFREY ALLEN REHDERDirectorAugust 8, 2022
Jeffrey Allen Rehder
/s/  MARK A. SUGGSDirectorAugust 8, 2022
Mark A. Suggs
/s/  MARSHA L. THOMPSONDirectorJuly 31, 2019August 8, 2022
Marsha L. Thompson
/s/  STEPHEN C. VAILDirectorJuly 31, 2019
Stephen C. Vail
/s/  BRUCE A. VITOSHDirectorJuly 31, 2019
Bruce A. Vitosh
/s/  TODD P. WAREDirectorJuly 31, 2019
Todd P. Ware
/s/  GREGORY D. WILLIAMSDirectorJuly 31, 2019
Gregory D. Williams
/s/  CURTIS WYNNDirectorJuly 31, 2019
Curtis Wynn


173
192