UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K
[X]
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20162019
ORor
[  ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Transition Period Fromtransition period from __________ to __________

Commission File Number 001-2960Number: 001-02960
nrimage.jpg
Newpark Resources, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware72-1123385
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
  
9320 Lakeside Blvd., Boulevard,Suite 100 
The Woodlands,Texas77381
(Address of principal executive officeoffices)(Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (281) code: (281) 362-6800

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each classTrading Symbol(s)Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, $0.01 par valueNRNew York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes ___      No √  
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
Yes ___      No √  
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes  √         No ___
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes √        No ___
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulations S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K ___
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”,filer,” “accelerated filer”filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “small reporting“emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. 
Large accelerated filer ___
Accelerated filer√   
Non-accelerated filerSmaller reporting company
  
Non-accelerated filer ___ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)Smaller Reporting Company ___Emerging growth company
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Act).
Yes ___      No √  
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant, computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold as of June 30, 2016,2019, was $476.0$651.3 million. The aggregate market value has been computed by reference to the closing sales price on such date, as reported by The New York Stock Exchange.
As of February 21, 2017,18, 2020, a total of 84,746,09889,897,646 shares of Common Stock,common stock, $0.01 par value per share, were outstanding.
Documents Incorporated by ReferenceReference:
Pursuant to General Instruction G(3) to this Form 10-K, the information required by Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 of Part III hereof is incorporated by reference from the registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement for its 20172020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.







NEWPARK RESOURCES, INC.
INDEX TO ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20162019


    
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
    
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
    
 
 
 
 
 
    
    
 
 
  




CAUTIONARY STATEMENT CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as amended. We also may provide oral or written forward-looking informationstatements in other materials we release to the public. Words such as “will”, “may”, “could”, “would”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “estimates”, “expects”, “plans”, “intends”,“will,” “may,” “could,” “would,” “should,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “plans,” “intends,” and similar expressions are intended to identify these forward-looking statements but are not the exclusive means of identifying them. These forward-looking statements reflect the current views of our management; however, various risks, uncertainties, contingencies and other factors, some of which are beyond our control, are difficult to predict and could cause our actual results, performance, or achievements to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, these statements, including the success or failure of our efforts to implement our business strategy. statements.
We assume no obligation to update, amend, or clarify publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by securities laws. In light of these risks, uncertainties, and assumptions, the forward-looking events discussed in this Annual Report on Form 10-K might not occur.
For further information regarding these and other factors, risks, and uncertainties affecting us, we refer you to the risk factors set forth in Item 1A "Risk Factors" of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. 






PART I
ITEM 1. Business
General
Newpark Resources, Inc. was organized in 1932 as a Nevada corporation. In 1991, we changed our state of incorporation to Delaware. We are a geographically diversified supplier providing products, as well as rentals and services primarily to the oil and natural gas exploration and production (“E&P”) industry. We operate our business through two reportable segments: Fluids Systems and Mats and Integrated Services. Our Fluids Systems segment provides customized drilling, completion, and stimulation fluids products and technical servicessolutions to E&P customers primarily in the North America and Europe, the Middle East and Africa (“EMEA”), Latin America andas well as certain countries in Asia Pacific regions.and Latin America. Our Mats and Integrated Services segment provides composite mat rentals as well as location construction andutilized for temporary worksite access, along with related site construction services to customers at well, production, transportation and refinery locations in the United States (“U.S.”). In addition, mat rental and services activity is expanding into applications in othervarious markets including E&P, electrical transmission & distribution, pipeline, solar, petrochemical, and construction industries across the U.S., CanadaNorth America and United Kingdom.Europe. We also manufacture and sell composite mats to customers outside ofaround the U.S., and to domestic customers outside of the oil and gas exploration market. In March 2014, we completed the sale of our Environmental Services business, which was historically reported as a third operating segment. For a detailed discussion of this matter, see “Note 14 - Discontinued Operations” in our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. world.
Our principal executive offices are located at 9320 Lakeside Blvd.,Boulevard, Suite 100, The Woodlands, Texas 77381. Our telephone number is (281) 362-6800. You can find more information about us aton our website located at www.newpark.com. We file or furnish annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other documents with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Our Annual Report on Form 10-K, our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, our Current Reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to those reports are available free of charge through our website. These reports are available as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file these materials with, or furnish them to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).SEC. Our Code of Ethics, our Corporate Governance Guidelines, our Audit Committee Charter, our Compensation Committee Charter and our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter are also posted to the corporate governance section of our website. We make our website content available for informational purposes only. It should not be relied upon for investment purposes, nor is it incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K. Information filed with the SEC may be read or copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C., 20549. Information on operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC also maintains a website at www.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC, including us.
When referring to “Newpark” and using phrases such as “we”Newpark Resources, Inc. (“Newpark,” the “Company,” “we,” “our,” or “us”), “us” and “our”, ourthe intent is to refer to Newpark Resources, Inc. and its subsidiaries as a whole or on a segment basis, depending on the context in which the statements are made. The reference to a “Note” herein refers to the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 8 “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”
Industry Fundamentals
Historically, several factors have driven demandOur operating results, particularly for our products and services, including the supply, demand and pricing ofFluids Systems segment, depend on oil and natural gas commodities, which drive E&P drilling and development activity. Demand for most of our Fluids Systems’ products and services is also driven, in part, by the level, type, depth and complexity of oil and gas drilling. Historically, drilling activity levels in North America have been volatile, primarily driven by the pricemarkets we serve and the nature of the drilling operations (including the depth and whether the wells are drilled vertically or horizontally), which governs the revenue potential of each well. Drilling activity levels, in turn, depend on a variety of factors, including oil and natural gas. Beginning ingas commodity pricing, inventory levels, product demand, and regulatory restrictions. Oil and natural gas prices and activity are cyclical and volatile, and this market volatility has a significant impact on our operating results.
While our revenue potential is driven by a number of factors including those described above, rig count data remains the fourth quarter of 2014 and continuing throughout 2015 and into early 2016, the price of oil declined dramatically from the price levels in recent years. As a result, E&P drilling activity significantly declined in North America and many global markets over this period. While oil prices have since improved from the lows reached in the first quarter of 2016, price levels remain lower than in recent years. The most widely accepted measureindicator of activity for ourdrilling activity. The average Baker Hughes Company North American operations is the Baker Hughes Rotary Rig Count. The average North America rig countCount was 6391,077 in 2016,2019, compared to 1,1701,223 in 2015,2018, and 2,2411,083 in 2014. The North America rig count continually declined in 2015 and early 2016, reaching a low point of 447 in May 2016, and has since recovered to 1,082 as of February 17, 2017. With the improvement in rig counts from the lows reached in May 2016, average activity levels are expected to improve in 2017 compared to 2016 but remain below 2015 levels.
The lower E&P drilling activity levels in 2015 and 2016 reduced the demand for our services, negatively impacted customer pricing and resulted in elevated costs associated with workforce reductions, all of which negatively impacted our profitability. Further, due to the fact that our business contains substantial levels of fixed costs, including significant facility and personnel expenses, North American operating margins in both operating segments have been negatively impacted by the lower customer demand.
Outside of North America, drilling activity is generally more stable as drilling activity in many countries is based upon longer termon longer-term economic projections and multiple yearmulti-year drilling programs, which tendtends to reduce the impact of short termshort-term changes in commodity prices on overall drilling activity. While drilling activity in certain
International expansion, including the penetration of international oil companies (“IOCs”) and national oil companies (“NOCs”), is a key element of our Fluids Systems strategy, which has historically helped to stabilize segment revenues, particularly as North American oil and natural gas exploration activities have fluctuated significantly.
In addition to our international markets, including Brazilexpansion efforts, we are also selectively expanding our presence in North America, capitalizing on our capabilities, infrastructure, and Australia, has declined dramatically following the decline in oil prices, our activitiesstrong market position in the EMEA region have continued to growNorth American land drilling fluids markets, both through the geographic entry in recent years, driven by expansion into new geographic markets,the deepwater Gulf of Mexico as well as through product line extensions into adjacent product offerings, including completion fluids and stimulation chemicals. As part of the completion fluids product line extension, in October 2019, we acquired Cleansorb Limited (“Cleansorb”), a U.K. based provider of specialty chemicals for the oil and natural gas industry, which further expands our fluids technology portfolio and capabilities.
Our Mats and Integrated Services segment serves a variety of industries in addition to the E&P industry, including the electrical transmission & distribution, pipeline, solar, petrochemical, and construction industries. The expansion of our rental and service activities in non-E&P markets remains a strategic priority for us due to the magnitude of this market share gainsgrowth opportunity as well as the market’s relative stability compared to E&P. The demand for our products and services from customers in existing markets.these industries is driven, in part, by infrastructure construction and maintenance activity levels in these industries within the U.S and the United Kingdom.



Reportable Segments
Fluids Systems
Our Fluids Systems businesssegment provides drilling and completion fluids products and technical services to customers primarily in the North America and EMEA Latin America, andregions, as well as certain countries in Asia Pacific regions.and Latin America. We offer customized solutions for highly technical drilling projects involving complex subsurface conditions such as horizontal, directional, geologically deep, or drilling in deep water drilling.water. These projects require increasedhigh levels of monitoring and critical engineeringtechnical support of the fluids system during the drilling process. In addition, our Fluids Systems offering is expanding into adjacent areas of chemistry, including stimulation chemicals, which are utilized extensively by E&P operators to stimulate hydrocarbon production.
We also have industrial mineral grinding operations for barite, a critical raw material in drilling fluids products,systems, which serve to support our activityactivities in the North American drilling fluids market. We grind barite and other industrial minerals at four facilities, including locations in Texas, Louisiana, and Tennessee. We use the resulting products in our drilling fluids business,systems and also sell themthe products to third party users, including other drilling fluids companies. We also sell a variety of other minerals, principally to third partythird-party industrial (non-oil and natural gas) markets.
Raw Materials — We believe that our sources of supply for materials and equipment used in our drilling fluids business are adequate for our needs,needs; however, we have experienced periods of short-term scarcity of barite ore, which have resulted in significant cost increases. Our specialty milling operation is our primary supplier of barite used in our North American drilling fluids business. Our mills obtain raw barite ore under supply agreements from foreign sources, primarily China and India. We obtain other materials used in the drilling fluids business from various third partythird-party suppliers. We have encountered no serioussignificant shortages or delays in obtaining these raw materials. 
Technology — Proprietary technology and systems, such as our Kronos™ deepwater drilling fluid systems, are an important aspect of our business strategy. We seek patents and licenses on new developments whenever we believe it creates a competitive advantage in the marketplace. We own patent rights in a family of high-performance water-based fluids systems, which we market as Evolution®,and DeepDrill®, and FlexDrillsystems, which are designed to enhance drilling performance and provide environmental benefits. We also rely on a variety of unpatented proprietary technologies and know-how in many of our applications. We believe that our reputation in the industry, the range of services we offer, ongoing technical development and know-how, responsiveness to customers, and understanding of regulatory requirements are of equal or greater competitive significance than our existing proprietary rights.
Competition — We face competition from larger companies, including Halliburton, Schlumberger, and Baker Hughes, which compete vigorously on fluids performance and/or price. In addition, these companies have broad product and service offerings in addition to their drilling fluids. We also have smaller regional competitors competing with us mainlyprimarily on price and local relationships. We believe that the principal competitive factors in our businesses include a combination of technical proficiency, reputation, price, reliability, quality, breadth of services offered, and experience. We believeexperience, and that our competitive position is enhanced by our proprietary products and services.
Customers — Our customers are principally major integrated and independent oil and natural gas E&P companies operating in the markets that we serve. During 2016,2019, approximately 60%53% of segment revenues were derived from the 20 largest segment customers, and 38% of segment revenues were generated domestically. For the year ended December 31, 2016, revenue from Sonatrach, our primarycustomers. No single customer in Algeria, was approximately 17%accounted for more than 10% of our segment revenues. The segment also generated 64% of its revenues and 14% of our consolidated revenues. Typically,domestically during 2019. In North America, we primarily perform services either under short-term standard contracts or under “master” service agreements. Internationally, some customers issue multi-year contracts, but many are on a well-by-well or project basis. As most agreements with our customers can be terminated upon short notice, our backlog is not significant. We do not derive a significant portion of our revenues from government contracts. See “Note 12 - Segment and Related Information” in our Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on financial and geographic data.
Mats and Integrated Services
Our Mats and Integrated Services segment provides composite mat rentals utilized for temporary worksite access, along with related site construction and services to customers in various markets including E&P, electrical transmission & distribution, pipeline, solar, petrochemical, and construction industries across North America and Europe. We also sell composite mats to customers around the world.
We manufacture our DURA-BASE® Advanced Composite Mats for use in our rental operations as well as for third-party sales. Our matsmatting systems provide environmental protection and ensure all-weather access to sites with unstable soil conditions. We provide mat rentals to customers in the E&P, electrical transmission & distribution, pipeline, solar, petrochemical and construction industries across the U.S., Canada and United Kingdom. We also offer location construction and related services to customers, primarily in the U.S. Gulf Coast region. We continue to expand our product offerings, which now include the EPZ Grounding System™ for enhanced safety and efficiency for contractors working on power line maintenance and construction projects and the Defender™ spill containmentT-REX™ automated mat cleaning system to provide customers with an alternativea cost effective system to the use of plastic liners for spill containment.
We also sellclean composite mats directon site. We continue to customersmake investments in areas around the world. Historically,matting and component innovation to deliver further differentiation and competitive advantage to our marketing effortsbusiness.
In November 2017, we acquired certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of Well Service Group, Inc. and Utility Access Solutions, Inc. (together, “WSG”). Since 2012, WSG had been a strategic logistics and installation service provider for the sale


our Mats and Integrated Service segment, offering a variety of complementary services to our composite mats focused on oilmatting systems, including access road construction, site planning and gas exploration markets outside the U.S.,preparation, environmental protection, fluids and spill containment, erosion control, and site restoration services. This acquisition expanded our service offering as well as markets outsideour geographic footprint across the E&P sectorNortheast, Midwest, Rockies, and West Texas regions of the U.S.
Raw Materials — The resins, chemicals, and other materials used to manufacture composite mats are widely available. Resin is the largest material component in the U.S. and Europe. We believe these mats have worldwide applications outside our traditional oilfield market, primarily in infrastructure construction, maintenance and upgrades of pipelines and electric utility transmission lines, and as temporary roads for movement of oversized or unusually heavy loads. In order to support our efforts to expand our markets globally, we completed an expansionmanufacturing of our mats manufacturing facility in 2015 which nearly doubled our manufacturing capacity and significantly expanded our research and development capabilities.


Raw Materials —composite mat products. We believe that our sources of supply for materials used in our business are adequate for our needs. We are not dependent upon any one supplier and we have encountered no serioussignificant shortages or delays in obtaining any raw materials. The resins, chemicals and other materials used to manufacture composite mats are widely available. Resin is the largest material component in the manufacturing of our composite mat products.
Technology — We have obtained patents related to the design and manufacturing of our DURA-BASE mats and several of the components, as well as other products and systems related to these mats (including the connecting pins and the EPZ Grounding System™ and the Defender™ spill containment system)). Using proprietary technology and systems is an important aspect of our business strategy. We believe that these products provide us with a distinct advantage over our competition. While we continue to add to our patent portfolio, two patents related to our DURA-BASE matting system will expire in May 2020, and competitors may begin offering mats that include features described in those patents. We believe that our scale and reputation in the industry, the range of services we offer, ongoing technical development and know-how, responsiveness to customers, and understanding of regulatory requirements also have competitive significance in the markets we serve.
Competition — Our market is fragmented and competitive, with many competitors providing various forms of site preparation products and services. The composite mat sales component of our business is not as fragmented as the rental and services segmentcomponents with only a few competitors providing various alternatives to our DURA-BASE mat products, such as Signature Systems Group and Checkers Group.ISOKON. This is due to many factors, including large capital start-up costs and proprietary technology associated with this product. We believe that the principal competitive factors in our businesses include reputation, product capabilities, price, reputation,innovation through R&D, and reliability. We also believereliability, and that our competitive position is enhanced by our proprietary products, manufacturing expertise, services, and experience.
Customers — Our customers are principally infrastructure construction and oil and natural gas E&P companies, utility companies, and infrastructure construction companies operating in the markets that we serve. Approximately 56%During 2019, approximately 55% of our segment revenues in 2016 were derived from the 20 largest segment customers, of which, the largestcustomers. No single customer represented 11%accounted for more than 10% of our segment revenues. The segment also generated 92% of its revenues domestically during 2019. As a result of our recent efforts to expand beyond our traditional oilfieldE&P customer base, revenues from non Enon-E&P customers continued to increase in 2016 andmarkets represented approximately 70%55% of our total segment revenues in 2016.2019. Typically, we perform services either under short-term contracts or rental service agreements. As most agreements with our customers are cancelable upon short notice, our backlog is not significant. We do not derive a significant portion of our revenues from government contracts. See “Note 12 - Segment and Related Information” in our Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on financial and geographic data.
Sale of Environmental Services Segment
In March 2014, we completed the sale of our Environmental Services business, which was historically reported as a third operating segment. For further discussion of this matter, see “Note 14 - Discontinued Operations” in our Consolidated Financial Statements.
The Environmental Services business processed and disposed of waste generated by our oil and gas customers that was treated as exempt under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (“RCRA”). The Environmental Services business also processed E&P waste contaminated with naturally occurring radioactive material. In addition, the business received and disposed of non-hazardous industrial waste, principally from generators of such waste in the U.S. Gulf Coast market, which produced waste that was not regulated under RCRA.
Employees
At January 31, 2017,2020, we employed approximately 1,8002,200 full and part-time personnel, none of which are represented by unions. We consider our relations with our employees to be satisfactory.
Environmental Regulation
Our business exposes us to environmental risks. We seek to comply with all applicable legal requirements concerning environmental matters. Our business is affected by governmental regulations relating to the oil and natural gas industry in general, as well as environmental, health, and safety regulations that have specific application to our business. Our activities are impacted by various federal and state regulatory agencies, and provincial pollution control, health, and safety programs that are administered and enforced by regulatory agencies.
Additionally, our business exposes us to environmental risks. We have implemented various procedures designed to ensure compliance with applicable regulations and reduce the risk of damage or loss. These include specified handling procedures and guidelines for waste, ongoing employee training, and monitoring, andas well as maintaining insurance coverage.
We also employutilize a corporate-wide web-based health, safety, and environmental management system (“HSEMS”), which is ISO 14001:2004 compliant.. The HSEMS is designed to capture information related to the planning, decision-making, and general operations of environmental regulatory activities within our operations. We also use the HSEMS to capture the information generated by regularly scheduled independent audits that are doneperformed to validate the findings of our internal monitoring and auditing procedures.




ITEM 1A. Risk Factors
The following summarizes the most significant risk factors to our business. In addition to these risks, we are subject to a variety of risks that affect many other companies generally, as well as other risks and uncertainties that are not known to us as of the date of this Annual Report. Our success will depend, in part, on our ability to anticipate and effectively manage these and other risks. Any of these risk factors, either individually or in combination, could have significanta material adverse impacts toeffect on our results of operations andor financial condition, or prevent us from meeting our profitability or growth objectives. If you hold our securities or are considering an investment in our securities, you should carefully consider the following risks, together with the other information contained in this Annual Report.
Risks Related to the Worldwide Oil and Natural Gas Industry
We derive a significant portion of our revenues from customers in the worldwide oil and natural gas industry; therefore, our risk factors include those factors that impact the demand for oil and natural gas. Spending by our customers for exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas is based on a number of factors, including expectations of future hydrocarbon demand, energy prices, the risks associated with developing reserves, our customer’scustomers’ ability to finance exploration and development of reserves, regulatory developments, and the future value of the reserves. Reductions in customer spending levels adversely affect the demand for our products and services, and consequently, our revenue and operating results; and the presence of these market conditions negatively affects our revenuerevenues and operating results. The key risk factors that we believe influence the worldwide oil and natural gas markets are discussed below.
Demand for oil and natural gas is subject to factors beyond our control
Demand for oil and natural gas, as well as the demand for our products and services, is highly correlated with global economic growth and in particular by the economic growth of countries such as the U.S., India, China, and developing countries in Asia and the Middle East. Weakness in global economic activity could reduce demand for oil and natural gas and result in lower oil and natural gas prices. In addition, demand for oil and natural gas could be impacted by the effects of global health epidemics and concerns (such as the coronavirus (“COVID-19”)) and by environmental regulation,regulations, including cap and trade legislation, regulation of hydraulic fracturing, and carbon taxes. Weakness or deterioration of the global economy could reduce our customers’ spending levels and could reduce our revenuerevenues and operating results.
Supply of oil and natural gas is subject to factors beyond our control
The ability to produceSupply of oil and natural gas can be affected by the availability of quality drilling prospects, exploration success, and the number and productivity of new wells drilled and completed, as well as the rate of production and resulting depletion of existing wells. Productive capacity in excess of demand is also an important factor influencing energy prices and spending by oil and natural gas exploration companies. Oil and natural gas storage inventory levels are indicators of the relative balance between supply and demand. In recent years, advancements in drilling and completion methods and technologies have contributed to a significant increase in oil production, particularly in the U.S. market. Supply can also be impacted by the degree to which individual Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (“OPEC”) nations and other large oil and natural gas producing countries are willing and able to control production and exports of hydrocarbons, to decrease or increase supply, and to support their targeted oil price or meet market share objectives. Any of these factors could affect the supply of oil and natural gas and could have a material effect on our results of operations.
Volatility of oil and natural gas prices can adversely affect demand for our products and services
Volatility inof oil and natural gas prices can also impact our customers’ activity levels and spending for our products and services. The level of energy prices is important to the cash flow for our customers and their ability to fund exploration and development activities. Compared to 2011 to 2014 levels, oil prices have declined significantly due in large part to increasing supplies, weakening demand growth and the decision by OPEC countries to maintain production levels throughout 2015 and most of 2016. Expectations about future commodity prices and price volatility are important for determining future spending levels. Our customers also take into account the volatility of energy prices and other risk factors by requiring higher returns for individual projects if there is higher perceived risk.
Our customers’ activity levels, spending for our products and services, and ability to pay amounts owed us could be impacted by the ability of our customers to access equity or credit markets
Our customers’ access to capital isactivity levels are dependent on their ability to access the funds necessary to develop oil and natural gas prospects. Limitedprospects and their ability to generate sufficient returns on investments. In recent years, limited access to external sources of funding and pressures from their investors to generate consistent cash flow has, and may continue to causeat times, caused customers to reduce their capital spending plans. In addition, a reduction of cash flow to our customers resulting from declines in commodity prices or the lack of available debt or equity financing may impact the ability of our customers to pay amounts owed to us.
A heightened focus by our customers on cost-saving measures rather than the quality of products and services could reduce the demand for our products and services
Our customers are continually seeking to implement measures aimed at greater cost savings, which may include the acceptance of lesser quality products and services in order to improve short term cost efficiencies as opposed to total cost efficiencies. The continued implementation of these kinds of cost saving measures could reduce the demand or pricing for our products and services and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.


Risks Related to our Customer Concentration and relianceReliance on the U.S. Exploration and ProductionE&P Market
In 2016,2019, approximately 53%42% of our consolidated revenues were derived from our 20 largest customers, which includes 14% from Sonatrach,although no customer accounted for more than 10% of our primaryconsolidated revenues. While we are not dependent on any one customer in Algeria.or group of customers, the loss of one or more of our significant customers could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and cash flows. In addition, approximately 45%71% of our consolidated revenues were derived from our U.S. operations.


Beginning in late 2014 and continuing throughout 2015 and into early 2016, the price of oil declined dramaticallyoperations, including approximately $460 million from the price levelsexploration and production market.
Over the past five years, we have experienced periods of significant declines in recent years. While oil prices have since improved from the lows reached in the first quarter of 2016, price levels remain lower than in recent years and there are no assurances that the price for oil will not further decline. Following this decline, North American drilling activity has decreased significantly, which has reduced the demand for our services and negatively impacted customer pricing in our North American operations. Due in part to these changes, our quarterly and annual operating results have been negatively impactedfluctuated significantly and may continue to fluctuate in future periods. Because our business has substantial fixed costs, including significant facility and personnel expenses, downtime or low productivity due to reduced demand cancould have a significantmaterial adverse impacteffect on our profitability.business, financial condition, and results of operations.
While geographic diversification into the U.S. offshore and foreign E&P markets, as well as our expansion into non-E&P markets, is intended over the long term to grow the business and offset the cyclical nature of the underlying oil and natural gas business, we cannot be certain that these efforts will be sufficient to offset this volatility.
Risks Related to International Operations
We have significant operations outside of the United States,U.S., including Canada and certain areas of Canada, EMEA,Europe, the Middle East, Africa, Asia Pacific, and Latin America, and Asia Pacific.America. In 2016,2019, these international operations generated approximately 55%29% of our consolidated revenues. Substantially all of our cash balance at December 31, 2019 resides within our international subsidiaries. Algeria representsrepresented our largest international market with our total Algerian operations representing 17%7% of our consolidated revenues in 2016for 2019 and 8%6% of our total assets at December 31, 2016.2019, including 35% of our total cash balance at December 31, 2019.
In addition, we may seek to expand to other areas outside the United StatesU.S. in the future. International operations are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, including:
difficulties and cost associated with complying with a wide variety of complex foreign laws, treaties, and regulations;
uncertainties in or unexpected changes in regulatory environments or tax laws;
legal uncertainties, timing delays, and expenses associated with tariffs, export licenses, and other trade barriers;
difficulties enforcing agreements and collecting receivables through foreign legal systems;
risks associated with failing to comply with the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the U.K. Bribery Act, export laws, and other similar laws applicable to our operations in international markets;
exchange controls or other limitations on international currency movements;movements, including restrictions on the repatriation of funds to the U.S. from certain countries;
sanctions imposed by the U.S. government that prevent us from engaging in business in certain countries or with certain counter-parties;
expropriation or nationalization of assets;
inability to obtain or preserve certain intellectual property rights in the foreign countries in which we operate;
our inexperience in certain international markets;
fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates;
political and economic instability; and
acts of terrorism.
In addition, several North African markets in which we operate, including Tunisia, Egypt, Libya, and Algeria have experienced social and political unrest in past years, which, when they occur, negatively impactedimpact our operating results includingand can include the temporary suspension of our operations. More recently
Risks Related to Our Ability to Attract, Retain, and Develop Qualified Leaders, Key Employees, and Skilled Personnel
Our failure to attract, retain, and develop qualified leaders and key employees at our corporate, divisional, or regional headquarters could have a material adverse effect on our business. In addition, all of our businesses are highly dependent on our ability to attract and retain highly-skilled product specialists, technical sales personnel, and service personnel. In recent years, the labor market in Brazil,the U.S. has continued to tighten, with national unemployment levels reaching the lowest level experienced in decades. Consequently, the market for qualified employees has become extremely competitive. If we cannot attract and retain qualified personnel, our ability to compete effectively and grow our business will be severely limited. Also, a widely-publicized corruption investigation, along with general social unrest, has ledsignificant increase in wages paid by competing employers could result in a reduction in our skilled labor force or an increase in our operating costs.


Risks Related to disruptionsthe Availability of Raw Materials
Our ability to provide products and services to our customers is dependent upon our ability to obtain raw materials necessary to operate our business.
Barite is a naturally occurring mineral that constitutes a significant portion of our drilling fluids systems. We currently secure the majority of our barite ore from foreign sources, primarily China and India. The availability and cost of barite ore is dependent on factors beyond our control, including transportation, political priorities, U.S. tariffs, and government-imposed export fees in Petrobras’ operations.the exporting countries, as well as the impact of weather and natural disasters. The future supply of barite ore from existing sources may be inadequate to meet the market demand, particularly during periods of increasing world-wide demand, which could ultimately restrict industry activity or our ability to meet our customers’ needs. Additionally, the recent outbreak of COVID-19 first identified in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China, could cause disruption to our supply of barite ore sourced from China and elsewhere. Our suppliers could be disrupted by worker absenteeism, quarantines, or other travel or health-related restrictions as a result of or concern over the outbreak. If our suppliers are so affected, our supply of barite ore could be disrupted, which could adversely affect our Fluids Systems business.
Our mats business is highly dependent on the availability of high-density polyethylene (“HDPE”), which is the primary raw material used in the manufacture of our composite mats. The cost of HDPE can vary significantly based on the energy costs of the producers of HDPE, demand for this material, and the capacity or operations of the plants used to make HDPE. Should the cost of HDPE increase, we may not be able to increase our customer pricing to cover our costs, which could result in a reduction in future profitability.
Risks Related to the Cost and Continued Availability of Borrowed Funds, including Risks of Noncompliance with Debt Covenants
We employuse borrowed funds as an integral part of our long-term capital structure and our future success is dependent upon continued access to borrowed funds to support our operations. The availability of borrowed funds on reasonable terms is dependent on the condition of credit markets and financial institutions from which these funds are obtained. Adverse events in the financial markets may significantly reduce the availability of funds, which may have an adverse effect on our cost of borrowings and our ability to fund our business strategy. Our ability to meet our debt service requirements and the continued availability of funds under our existing or future loan agreements is dependent upon our ability to generate operating income and remain in compliance with the covenants in our debt agreements. This, in turn, is subject to the volatile nature of the oil and natural gas industry, and to competitive, economic, financial, and other factors that are beyond our control.
In May 2016, we entered intoWe fund our ongoing operational needs through a new$200.0 million asset-based revolving credit agreement as(as amended, in February 2017, (thethe “ABL Facility”). The ABL Facility is a senior secured obligation, secured by first liens on substantially all of our U.S. tangible and intangible assets, and a portion of the capital stock of our non-U.S. subsidiaries has also been pledged as collateral. The ABL Facility contains customary operating covenants and certain restrictions including, among other things, the incurrence of additional debt, liens, dividends, asset sales, investments, mergers, acquisitions, affiliate transactions, stock repurchases and other restricted payments. The ABL Facility requires compliance with a fixed charge coverage ratio if availability under the ABL Facility falls below $22.5 million. Borrowing availability under the ABL Facility is calculated based on eligible accounts receivable, inventory, and, subject to satisfaction of certain financial covenants as described below, composite mats included in the rental fleet, net of reserves and limits on such assets included in the borrowing base calculation. To the extent pledged by us, the borrowing base calculation shall also include the amount of eligible pledged cash. The lender may establish reserves, in part based on appraisals of the asset base, and other limits at its discretion which could reduce the amounts otherwise available under the ABL Facility. Availability associated with eligible rental mats willis also be subject to maintaining a minimum consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio and a minimum level of operating income for the Mats and Integrated Services segment. The availability under the ABL Facility is expected to fluctuate directionally with changes in our domestic accounts receivable, inventory, and composite mat rental fleet.


The ABL Facility terminates on March 6, 2020; however, the ABL Facility has a springing maturity date that will accelerate the maturity of the credit facility to June 30, 2017As such, if prior to such date, the convertible notes due 2017 (“Convertible Notes due 2017”) have not either been repurchased, redeemed, converted or we have not provided sufficient funds to repay the Convertible Notes due 2017 in full on their maturity date. For this purpose, funds may be provided in cash to an escrow agent or a combination of cash to an escrow agent and the assignment of a portion of availability under the ABL Facility. The ABL Facility requires compliance with a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio and minimum unused availability of $25.0 million to utilize borrowings or assignment of availability under the ABL Facility towards funding the repayment of the 2017 Convertible Notes. We intend to use available cash on-hand, cash generated by operations, including U.S. income tax refunds, and estimated availability under our ABL Facility to repay the remaining Convertible Notes due 2017. If the timing of the U.S. income tax refunds are delayed and the other sources described above are not sufficient to repay the remaining Convertible Notes due 2017, we could seek other financing alternatives to satisfy the funding requirement for the Convertible Notes due 2017. If we are unable to satisfymaintain such financial covenants, the funding requirement for the Convertible Notes due 2017, this could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.
We are subject to compliance with a fixed charge coverage ratio covenant if ouramount of borrowing availability falls below $25.0 million. would be reduced.
If we are unable to make required payments under the ABL Facility or other indebtedness of more than $25.0 million, or if we fail to comply with the various covenants and other requirements of the ABL Facility, including the June 30, 2017 funding requirement for the Convertible Notes due 2017, we would be in default thereunder, which would permit the holders of the indebtedness to accelerate the maturity thereof unless we are able to obtain, on a timely basis, a necessary waiver or amendment. Any waiver or amendment may require us to revise the terms of our agreements which could increase the cost of our borrowings, require the payment of additional fees, and adversely impact the results of our operations. Upon the occurrence of any event of default that is not waived, the lenders could elect to exercise any of their available remedies, which include the right to not lend any additional amounts or, in the event we have outstanding indebtedness under the ABL Facility, to declare any outstanding indebtedness, together with any accrued interest and other fees, to be immediately due and payable. If we are unable to repay the outstanding indebtedness, if any, under the ABL Facility when due, the lenders would be permitted to proceed against their collateral. In the event any outstanding indebtedness in excess of $25.0 million is accelerated, this could also cause an event of default under our 2021 Convertible Notes due 2017 and our convertible notes due 2021 (“Convertible Notes due 2021”)(as defined below). The acceleration of any of our indebtedness and the election to exercise any remedies could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.
In addition, our $100.0 million of unsecured convertible senior notes (“2021 Convertible Notes”) mature in December 2021. Our ABL Facility has a springing maturity date that will accelerate the maturity of the ABL Facility from March 2024 to September 1, 2021 if, prior to such remediesdate, the 2021 Convertible Notes have not been repurchased, redeemed, refinanced, exchanged or otherwise satisfied in full or we have not escrowed an amount of funds, that together with the amount that we establish as a reserve against our borrowing capacity, is sufficient for the future settlement of the 2021 Convertible Notes at their maturity. We cannot make any assurance that our cash flow from operations, combined with any additional borrowings available to us, will be sufficient to enable us to repay the 2021 Convertible Notes prior to September 1, 2021, or to fund other liquidity needs.


If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flows to repay the 2021 Convertible Notes and our other indebtedness when due or to fund our other liquidity needs, we may be required to adopt one or more alternatives, such as selling assets, restructuring debt or obtaining additional financing. Our ability to refinance the 2021 Convertible Notes or our other indebtedness will depend on the capital markets and our financial condition at such time. We may not be able to engage in any of these activities or engage in these activities on desirable terms, which could result in a default on our debt obligations and could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.
Risks Related to Operating Hazards Present in the Oil and Natural Gas Industry and Substantial Liability Claims, Including Catastrophic Well Incidents
We are exposed to significant health, safety, and environmental risks. Our operations are subject to hazards present in the oil and natural gas industry, such as fire, explosion,fires, explosions, blowouts, oil spills, and leaks or spills of hazardous materials (both onshore and offshore). These incidents as well as accidents or problems in normal operations can cause personal injury or death and damage to property or the environment. The customer’s operations can also be interrupted and it is possible that such incidents can interrupt our ongoing operations and the ability to provide our services. From time to time, customers seek recovery for damage to their equipment or property that occurred during the course of our service obligations. Damage to the customer’sour customers’ property and any related spills of hazardous materials could be extensive if a major problem occurred. We purchaseoccurs.
Generally, we rely on contractual indemnities, releases, limitations on liability with our customers, and insurance which may provide coverage for incidentsto protect us from potential liability related to such as those described above, however, the policiesevents. However, our insurance and contractual indemnification may not providebe sufficient or effective to protect us under all circumstances or against all risks. In addition, our customers’ changing views on risk allocation together with deteriorating market conditions could force us to accept greater risks to obtain new business, retain renewing business or could result in us losing business if we are not prepared to take such risks. Moreover, we may not be able to maintain insurance at levels of risk coverage or a sufficient amountpolicy limits that we deem adequate. Any damages caused by our services or products that are not covered by insurance or contractual indemnification, or are in excess of coverage for all typespolicy limits or subject to substantial deductibles, could adversely affect our financial condition, results of damage claims that could be asserted against us.operations, and cash flows. See the section entitled “Risks Related to the Inherent Limitations of Insurance Coverage” below for additional information.
Risks Related to Business Acquisitions and Capital Investments
Our ability to successfully execute our business strategy will depend, among other things, on our ability to make capital investments and acquisitions which provide us with financial benefits. In 2017, our capital expenditures are expected to range between $15.0 million to $20.0 million (exclusive of any acquisitions), including expenditures for the completion of the facility upgradeThese acquisitions and expansion of our Fourchon, Louisiana facility serving the Gulf of Mexico deepwater market in the Fluids Systems segment. These investments are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, including:
incorrect assumptions regarding business activity levels or results from our capital investments, acquired operations, or assets;
insufficient revenues to offset liabilities assumed;
potential loss of significant revenue and income streams;
increased or unexpected expenses;
inadequate return of capital;
regulatory or compliance issues;
the triggering of certain covenants in our debt agreements (including accelerated repayment);
unidentified issues not discovered in due diligence;
failure to complete a planned acquisition transaction or to successfully integrate the operations or management of any acquired businesses or assets in a timely manner;
diversion of management'smanagement’s attention from existing operations or other priorities;
unanticipated disruptions to our business associated with the implementation of our enterprise-wide operational and financial system; and
delays in completion and cost overruns associated with large construction projects, including the projects mentioned above.capital investments.
Any of the factors above could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or results of operations.



Risks Related to the Availability of Raw Materials and Skilled Personnel
Our ability to provide products and services to our customers is dependent upon our ability to obtain the raw materials and qualified personnel necessary to operate our business.
Barite is a naturally occurring mineral that constitutes a significant portion of our drilling fluids systems. We currently secure the majority of our barite ore from foreign sources, primarily China and India. The availability and cost of barite ore is dependent on factors beyond our control including transportation, political priorities and government imposed export fees in the exporting countries, as well as the impact of weather and natural disasters. The future supply of barite ore from existing sources could be inadequate to meet the market demand, particularly during periods of increasing world-wide demand, which could ultimately restrict industry activity or our ability to meet customer’s needs.
Our mats business is highly dependent on the availability of high-density polyethylene (“HDPE”), which is the primary raw material used in the manufacture of our DURA-BASE mats. The cost of HDPE can vary significantly based on the energy costs of the producers of HDPE, demand for this material, and the capacity/operations of the plants used to make HDPE. Should our cost of HDPE increase, we may not be able to increase our customer pricing to cover our costs, which may result in a reduction in future profitability.
All of our businesses are also highly dependent on our ability to attract and retain highly-skilled engineers, technical sales and service personnel. The market for these employees is competitive, and if we cannot attract and retain quality personnel, our ability to compete effectively and to grow our business will be severely limited. Also, a significant increase in the wages paid by competing employers could result in a reduction in our skilled labor force or an increase in our operating costs.
Risk Related to our Market Competition
We face competition in the Fluids Systems business from larger companies, including Halliburton, Schlumberger, and Baker Hughes, which compete vigorously on fluids performance and/or price. In addition, these companies have broad product and service offerings in addition to their drilling and completion fluids. At times, these larger companies attempt to compete by offering discounts to customers to use multiple products and services, from our competitor, some of which we do not offer. We also have smaller regional competitors competing with us mainly on price and local relationships.
Our competition in the Mats and Integrated Services business is fragmented, with many competitors providing various forms of matworksite access products and services. More recently, several competitors have begun marketing composite products to compete with our DURA-BASE mat system. We have obtained patents related to the design and manufacturing of our DURA-BASE mats and several of the components, as well as other products and systems related to these mats. While we believe the design and manufacture of our mat products provide a differentiated value to our customers, many of our competitors seek to compete on pricing. Further,In addition, some of the weaknessearly patents we received related to our DURA-BASE mat system will expire in North American drilling activity2020 and competitors may begin offering mats that include features described in recent years has resulted in significant reductions in pricing from manythose patents. We have additional patents and pending patent applications on improvements to, features of, and uses of the DURA-BASE mat system, but there is no assurance that our competitors in bothwill not be able to offer products that are similar to these improvements, features, or uses of the Fluids Systems and Mats and Integrated Services segments.DURA-BASE mat system.
Risks Related to LegalContracts that Can Be Terminated or Downsized by Our Customers Without Penalty
Many of our fixed-term contracts contain provisions permitting early termination by the customer at their convenience, generally without penalty, and Regulatory Matters, Includingwith limited notice requirements. In addition, many of our contracts permit our customers to decrease the products or services without penalty, which could result in a decrease in our revenues and profitability. As a result, you should not place undue reliance on the strength of our customer contracts or the terms of those contracts.
Risks Related to Product Offering Expansion
As a key component of our long-term strategy to diversify our revenue streams generated from both operating segments, we seek to continue to expand our product and service offerings and enter new customer markets with our existing products. As with any market expansion effort, new customer and product markets require additional capital investment and include inherent uncertainties regarding customer expectations, industry-specific regulatory requirements, product performance, and customer-specific risk profiles. In addition, we likely will not have the same level of operational experience with respect to the new customer and product markets as will our competitors. As such, new market entry is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or results of operations.
Risks Related to Environmental Laws and Regulations
We are responsible for complying with numerous federal, state, local, and foreign laws, regulations and policies that govern environmental protection, zoning and other matters applicable to our current and past business activities, including the activities of our former subsidiaries. Failure to remain compliant with these laws, regulations and policies may result in, among other things, fines, penalties, costs of cleanup of contaminated sites and site closure obligations, or other expenditures. We could be exposed to strict, joint and several liability for cleanup costs, natural resource damages and other damages as a result of our conduct that was lawful at the time it occurred or the conduct of, or conditions caused by, prior operators or other third parties. Further, any changes in the current legal and regulatory environment could impact industry activity and the demands for our products and services, the scope of products and services that we provide, or our cost structure required to provide our products and services, or the costs incurred by our customers.
TheMany of the markets for our products and services are dependent on the continued exploration for and production of fossil fuels (predominantly oil and natural gas). ClimateIn recent years, the topic of climate change is receivinghas received increased attention worldwide. Many scientists, legislators and others attribute climate change to increased levels of greenhouse gases, including carbon dioxide attributed to the use of fossil fuels, which has led to significant legislative and regulatory efforts to limit greenhouse gas emissions. The Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”) and other domestic and foreign regulatory agencies have adopted regulations that potentially limit greenhouse gas emissions and impose reporting obligations on large greenhouse gas emission sources. In addition, the EPA has adopted rules that could require the reduction of certain air emissions during exploration and production of oil and natural gas. To the extent that laws and regulations enacted as part of climate change legislation increase the costs of drilling for or producing such fossil fuels, limit or restrict oil and natural gas exploration and production, or reduce the demand for fossil fuels, such legislation could have a material adverse impacteffect on our operations and profitability. In addition, there have also been efforts in recent years to influence the investment community, including investment advisors and certain sovereign wealth, pension and endowment funds, promoting divestment of fossil fuel equities and pressuring lenders to limit funding to companies engaged in the extraction of fossil fuel reserves. Such environmental activism and initiatives aimed at limiting climate change and reducing air pollution could interfere with our business activities, operations, and ability to access capital.



Hydraulic fracturing is an increasinglya common practice used by E&P operators to stimulate production of hydrocarbons, particularly from shale oil and natural gas formations in the United States.U.S. The process of hydraulic fracturing, which involves the injection of sand (or other forms of proppants) laden fluids into oil and natural gas bearing zones, has come under increasingincreased scrutiny from a variety of regulatory agencies, including the EPA and various state authorities. Several states have adopted regulations requiring operators to identify the chemicals used in fracturing operations, others have adopted moratoriums on the use of fracturing, and the State of New York has banned the practice altogether. The EPA is studyingIn addition, concerns have been raised about whether injection of waste associated with hydraulic fracturing operations, or from the potentialfracturing operations themselves, may cause or increase the impact of earthquakes. Studies are in process regarding the correlation between hydraulic fracturing on drinking water including impacts from the disposal of waste fluid by underground injection.and earthquakes. Although we do not provide hydraulic fracturing services, and our drilling fluids products are notwe offer stimulation chemicals used in such services, regulationsthe hydraulic fracturing process. Regulations which have the effect of limiting the use or significantly increasing the costs of hydraulic fracturing could have a significant negative impactmaterial adverse effect on both the drilling and stimulation activity levels of our customers, and, therefore, the demand for our products and services.
Risks Related to Legal Compliance
As a global business, we are subject to complex laws and regulations in the U.S., the U.K. and other countries in which we operate. These laws and regulations relate to a number of aspects of our business, including anti-bribery and anti-corruption laws, sanctions against business dealings with certain countries and third parties, the payment of taxes, employment and labor relations, immigration, fair competition, data privacy protections, securities regulation, and other regulatory requirements affecting trade and investment. The application of these laws and regulations to our business is often unclear and may sometimes conflict. Compliance with these laws and regulations may involve significant costs or require changes in our business practices that could result in reduced revenue and profitability. Non-compliance could also result in significant fines, damages, and other criminal sanctions against us, our officers or our employees, prohibitions or additional requirements on the conduct of our business and damage our reputation. Certain violations of law could also result in suspension or debarment from government contracts. We also incur additional legal compliance costs associated with global regulations. In some foreign countries, particularly those with developing economies, it may be customary for others to engage in business practices that are prohibited by laws such as the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the U.K. Bribery Act, the Italian Criminal Code in Italy, Brazil’s Clean Companies Act, India’s Prevention of Corruption Act and The Companies Act, and Mexico’s Anti-Corruption Law. Although we implement policies and procedures designed to ensure compliance with these laws, there can be no assurance that all of our employees, contractors, agents, and business partners will not take action in violation with our internal policies. In the U.S., there have been increasing instances of opioid and other illicit drug usage as well as illegal immigration in certain of the regions in which we operate. While we have taken steps we believe appropriate to ensure that our employees comply with our internal drug and alcohol policy as well as all applicable immigration laws, we cannot assure you there will not be violations in the future. Any such violation of our internal policies or the law could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business, financial condition, or results of operations.
Risks Related to the Inherent Limitations of Insurance Coverage
While we maintain liability insurance, this insurance is subject to coverage limitations. Specific risks and limitations of our insurance coverage include the following:
self-insured retention limits on each claim, which are our responsibility;
exclusions for certain types of liabilities and limitations on coverage for damages resulting from pollution;
coverage limits of the policies, and the risk that claims will exceed policy limits; and
the financial strength and ability of our insurance carriers to meet their obligations under the policies.
In addition, our ability to continue to obtain insurance coverage on commercially reasonable terms is dependent upon a variety of factors impacting the insurance industry in general, which are outside our control. Any of the issues noted above, including insurance cost increases, uninsured or underinsured claims, or the inability of an insurance carrier to meet their financial obligations could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Risks Related to Income Taxes
Our future effective tax rates could be adversely affected by changes in tax laws, both domestically and internationally, or the interpretation or application thereof.  From time to time, U.S. and foreign tax authorities, including state and local governments consider legislation that could increase our effective tax rate. We cannot determine whether, or in what form, legislation will ultimately be enacted or what the impact of any such legislation could have on our profitability. If such changes to tax laws are enacted, our profitability could be negatively impacted.
Our future effective tax rates could be adversely affected by changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities, changes in the mix of earnings in countries with differing statutory tax rates, or by changes in tax treaties, regulations, accounting principles or interpretations thereof in one or more countries in which we operate. In addition, we are subject to the potential examination of our income tax returns by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service and by other tax authorities in jurisdictions where we file tax returns. We regularly assess the likelihood of adverse outcomes resulting from these examinations to determine


the adequacy of our provision for income taxes. There can be no assurance that such examinations will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or results of operations.
Risks Related to Potential Impairments of Goodwill and Long-lived Intangible Assets
As of December 31, 2016,2019, our consolidated balance sheet includes $20.0$42.3 million inof goodwill and $6.1$29.7 million of intangible assets, net. Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are tested for impairment annually, or more frequently as the circumstances require, using a combination of market multiple and discounted cash flow approaches. Duringif any qualitative factors exist. In completing this annual evaluation during the fourth quarter of 2015,2019, we determined that our drilling fluidsFluids Systems reporting unit had a fair value below its net carrying value, and we recognized a goodwillan impairment of $70.7 million. During the second quarter of 2016, we$11.4 million was recognized a $3.1 million charge to fully impair the customergoodwill related intangible assets forto this reporting unit. We also determined that the Asia Pacific region.
In 2016, oilMats and natural gas pricesIntegrated Services reporting unit did not have a fair value below its net carrying value and U.S. drilling activity remained significantly belowtherefore, no impairment was required. As of December 31, 2019, all of our goodwill relates to the levels of recent years. Although activity levels have improved in the second half of 2016Mats and early 2017, continued weakness or volatility in market conditions may further deteriorateIntegrated Services segment. If the financial performance or future projections for our operating segmentsreporting units deteriorate from current levels, which may result in ana future impairment of goodwill or indefinite-lived intangible assets andmay be required, which would negatively impact our financial results in the period of impairment.
Risks Related to Technological Developments and Intellectual Property in ourOur Industry
The market for our products and services is characterized by continual technological developments that generate substantial improvements in product functions and performance.performance or service delivery. If we are not successful in continuing to develop productnew products, enhancements, or new productsimproved service delivery that are accepted in the marketplace or that comply with industry standards, we could lose market share to competitors, which would negatively impactcould have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
Our success can be affected by our development and implementation of new product designs and improvements, or software developments, and by our ability to protect and maintain critical intellectual property assets related to these developments. Although in many cases our products are not protected by any registered intellectual property rights, in other cases we rely on a combination of patents and trade secret laws to establish and protect this proprietary technology. While patent rights give the owner of a patent the right to exclude third parties from making, using, selling, and offering for sale the inventions claimed in the patents, they do not necessarily grant the owner of a patent the right to practice the invention claimed in a patent. It may also be possible for a third party to design around our patents. We hold U.S.do not have patents in every country in which we conduct business and foreign patents for certainour patent portfolio will not protect all aspects of our drilling fluids componentsbusiness. When patent rights expire, competitors are generally free to offer the technology and our mat systems. However, these patents are not a guaranteeproducts that we will have a meaningful advantage over our competitors, and there is a risk that others may develop systems that are substantially equivalent to thosewere covered by the patents. Additionally, the trade secret laws of some foreign countries may not protect our patents. Ifproprietary technology in the same manner as the laws of the United States.
We also protect our trade secrets by customarily entering into confidentiality and/or license agreements with our employees, customers and potential customers, and suppliers. Our rights in our confidential information, trade secrets, and confidential know-how will not prevent third parties from independently developing similar information. Publicly available information (such as information in expired patents, published patent applications, and scientific literature) can also be used by third parties to independently develop technology. We cannot provide assurance that werethis independently developed technology will not be equivalent or superior to happen, we would face increased competitionour proprietary technology.
We may from both a service and a pricing standpoint. In addition, costlytime to time engage in expensive and time-consuming litigation could be necessaryto determine the enforceability, scope, and validity of our patent rights. In addition, we can seek to enforce our rights in trade secrets, or “know-how,” and determineother proprietary information and technology in the scopeconduct of our patents and proprietary rights. Itbusiness. However, it is possible that future innovationour competitors may infringe upon, misappropriate, violate or challenge the validity or enforceability of our intellectual property, and we may not able to adequately protect or enforce our intellectual property rights in the future.
The tools, techniques, methodologies, programs, and components we use to provide our services may infringe upon the intellectual property rights of others. Infringement claims generally result in significant legal and other costs, and may distract management from running our business. Royalty payments under licenses from third parties, if applicable, could change the way companies drill for oil and gas,increase our costs. Additionally, developing non-infringing technologies could increase our costs. If a license were not available, we might not be able to continue providing a particular service or utilize matting systems,product, which could reduce the competitive advantages we may derive fromadversely affect our patentsfinancial condition, results of operations and other proprietary technology.cash flows.
Risks Related to Severe Weather, Particularly in the U.S. Gulf CoastNatural Disasters, and Seasonality
We have significant operations located in market areas around the world that are negatively impacted by severe adverse weather events or natural disasters such as hurricanes in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, fires and related near-shore areas whichtyphoons in Australia, droughts across the U.S. and excessive rains outside of the U.S. A potential result of climate change is more frequent or more severe weather events or natural disasters. To the extent such weather events or natural disasters become more frequent or severe, disruptions to our business and costs to repair damaged facilities could increase. Additionally, there are susceptible to hurricanes and other adverse weather events. In these market areas we generated approximately 14%around the world in which our operations are subject to seasonality such as Canada where the Spring “break-up” (an industry term used to describe the time of year when the frost comes out of the ground causing the earth to become soft and muddy and strict weight restrictions are implemented by the government to prevent potholes forming on roads) results in a significant slowdown in the oil and natural gas


industry and our consolidated revenue in 2016 and had approximately $200 million of inventory and property, plant and equipment as of December 31, 2016.drilling fluids business each year. Such adverse weather events and seasonality can disrupt our operations and result in damage to our properties, as well as negatively impact the activity and financial condition of our customers. Our business may be adversely affected by these and other negative effects of future hurricanes or other adverse weather events in regions in which we operate.


Risks Related to Cybersecurity Breaches or Business System Disruptions
We utilize various management information systems and information technology infrastructure to manage or support a variety of our business operations, and to maintain various records, which may include confidential business or proprietary information as well as information regarding our customers, business partners, employees or other third parties. Failures of or interference with access to these systems, such as communication disruptions, could have an adverse effect on our ability to conduct operations or directly impact consolidated financial reporting. Security breaches pose a risk to confidential data and intellectual property, which could result in damagestransaction errors, processing inefficiencies, the loss of sales and customers, data privacy breaches and damage to our competitiveness and reputation. We have policies and procedures in place, including system monitoring and data back-up processes, to prevent or mitigate the effects of these potential disruptions or breaches, howeverbreaches. We do not carry insurance against these risks, although we do invest in security technology, perform penetration tests from time to time, and design our business processes to attempt to mitigate the risk of such breaches. However, there can be no assurance that existing or emerging threatssecurity breaches will not occur.
Additionally, the development and maintenance of these measures requires continuous monitoring as technologies change and efforts to overcome security measures evolve. We have an adverseexperienced, and expect to continue to experience, cybersecurity threats and incidents, none of which have been material to us to date. However, a successful breach or attack could have a material negative impact on our systemsoperations or communications networks. These risks couldbusiness reputation, harm our reputation and our relationships with our customers, business partners, employees or other third parties, and may result in claims against us.subject us to consequences such as litigation and direct costs associated with incident response. In addition, these risks could have a material adverse effect on our business, consolidated results of operations, and consolidated financial condition.
Risks Related to Fluctuations in the Market Value of our Common StockOur Publicly Traded Securities
The market price of our common stockpublicly traded securities may fluctuate due to a number of factors, including the general economy, stock market conditions, general trends in the E&P industry, changes in government or environmental regulations, commodity prices, announcements made by us or our competitors, and variations in our operating results. Investors may not be able to predict the timing or extent of these fluctuations.

ITEM 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.




ITEM 2. Properties
We lease office space to support our operating segments as well as our corporate offices. All material domestic owned properties are subject to liens and security interests under our ABL Facility.
Fluids Systems.  We own a facility containing approximately 103,000 square feet of office space on approximately 11 acres of land in Katy, Texas, which houses the divisional headquarters and technology center for this segment. We also own a distribution warehouse and fluids blending facility containing approximately 65,000 square feet of office and industrial space on approximately 21 acres of land in Conroe, Texas. Additionally, we own six warehouse facilities and have 15 leased warehouses and 10 contract warehouses to support our customers and operations in the U.S. We own two warehouse facilities and have 19 contract warehouses in Canada to support our Canadian operations. Additionally, we lease 19 warehouses and own one warehouse in the EMEA region, lease five warehouses in the Latin America region, and own one warehouse and lease five warehouses in the Asia Pacific region to support our international operations. This leased space is located in several cities primarily in the United States, Canada, Italy, Eastern Europe, North Africa, Kuwait, Brazil, and Australia. We also own buildings providing officeapproximately 11 acres of industrial space in OklahomaFourchon, Louisiana which houses drilling and office/warehouse space in Henderson, Australia. Somecompletion fluids blending, storage, and transfer stations to serve the deepwater Gulf of the warehouses listedMexico market. We also include blending facilities.
We operate four specialty product grinding facilities on owned or leased land in the U.S. TheseAdditionally, we own or lease various facilities are located in Houston, Texas on approximately 18 acresand warehouses throughout the world to support our operations. Some of owned land, in New Iberia, Louisiana on 15.7 acres of leased land, in Corpus Christi, Texas on 6 acres of leased land, and in Dyersburg, Tennessee on 13.2 acres of owned land.these warehouses include blending facilities.
Mats and Integrated Services.  We own a facility containing approximately 93,000 square feet of office and industrial space on approximately 34 acres of land in Carencro, Louisiana, which houses our manufacturing facilities the divisional headquarters, and technology center for this segment. We also own or lease eight sitesvarious facilities and warehouses throughout Texas, Pennsylvania, Colorado, Illinois and Wisconsin which servethe U.S., as bases for our well site service activities. Additionally, we own two facilities which are located in Louisiana and Texas and lease twoas facilities in the United Kingdom, to support our field operations.

ITEM 3. Legal Proceedings
Wage and Hour Litigation
Davida v. Newpark Drilling Fluids LLC. On June 18, 2014, Jesse Davida, a former employee of Newpark Drilling Fluids LLC, filed a class action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas, San Antonio Division, alleging violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”). The plaintiff sought damages and penalties for our alleged failure to properly classify our field service employees as “non-exempt” under the FLSA and pay them on an hourly basis (including overtime). On January 6, 2015, the Court granted the plaintiff’s motion to “conditionally” certify the class of fluid service technicians that have worked for Newpark Drilling Fluids over the past three years.


Christiansen v. Newpark Drilling Fluids LLC. On November 11, 2014, Josh Christiansen (represented by the same counsel as Davida) filed a purported class action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division, alleging violations of the FLSA. The plaintiff sought damages and penalties for our alleged failure to properly classify him as an employee rather than an independent contractor; properly classify our field service employees as “non-exempt” under the FLSA; and, pay them on an hourly basis (including overtime) and sought damages and penalties for our alleged failure to pay him and the others in the proposed class on an hourly basis (including overtime). Following the filing of this lawsuit, five additional plaintiffs joined the proceedings. In March of 2015, the Court denied the plaintiffs’ motion for conditional class certification. Counsel for the plaintiffs did not appeal that ruling and subsequently filed individual cases for each of the original opt-in plaintiffs plus two new plaintiffs, leaving a total of eight separate independent contractor cases.
Additional Individual FLSA cases.In the fourth quarterordinary course of 2015,conducting our business, we become involved in litigation and other claims from private party actions, as well as judicial and administrative proceedings involving governmental authorities at the same counsel representingfederal, state, and local levels. While the plaintiffsoutcome of litigation or other proceedings against us cannot be predicted with certainty, management does not expect that any loss resulting from such litigation or other proceedings, in the Davida and Christiansen-related cases filed two additional individual FLSA cases on behalfexcess of former fluid service technician employees. These cases are similar in nature to the Davida case discussed above.
Resolution of Wage and Hour Litigation. Beginning in November 2015, we engaged in settlement discussions with counsel for the plaintiffs in the pending wage and hour litigation cases described above. As a result of the then ongoing settlement negotiations, we recognized a $5.0 million charge in the fourth quarter of 2015 related to the resolution of these wage and hour litigation claims. Following mediation in January 2016, the parties executed a settlement agreement in April 2016 to resolve all of the pending matters, subject to a number of conditions, including approval by the Court in the Davida case, and the dismissal of the other FLSA cases (Christiansen-related lawsuits and individual FLSA cases). The settlement agreement was approved by the Davida Court on August 19, 2016. Approximately 569 current and former fluid service technician employees eligible for the settlement were notified of the pending resolution beginning on August 26, 2016 and given an opportunity to participate in the settlement. The amount paid to any eligible individual varied based on a formula that takes into account the number of workweeks and salary for the individual during the time periodamounts accrued or covered by the settlement. Any eligible individual that elected to participate in the settlement released all wage and hour claims against us.
The deadline for submitting claims or opting out was October 25, 2016 with 379 individuals filing claims and no individuals opting out. The percentage of current or former fluid service technicians that elected to participate in the settlement represented approximately 67% of the individuals receiving notice. Individuals that did not participate in the settlement may retain the right to file an individual lawsuit against us, subject to any defenses we may assert. Asinsurance, will have a result of the settlement agreement, we funded the $4.5 million settlement amount into the settlement fund in the second half of 2016. The settlement fund was administered by a third party who made payments to eligible individuals that elected to participate in accordance with a formula incorporated into the settlement agreement. In addition, under the terms of settlement agreement, settlement funds that remained after all payments were made to eligible individuals that elected to participate in the settlement were shared by the participating individuals and us. In the fourth quarter of 2016, we recognized a $0.7 million gain associated with the change in final settlement amount of these wage and hour litigation claims.
Escrow Claims Related to the Sale of the Environmental Services Business
Newpark Resources, Inc. v. Ecoserv, LLC. On July 13, 2015, we filed a declaratory action in the District Court in Harris County, Texas (80th Judicial District) seeking release of $8.0 million of funds placed in escrow by Ecoserv in connection with its purchase ofmaterial adverse impact on our Environmental Services business. Ecoserv has filed a counterclaim asserting that we breached certain representations and warranties contained in the purchase/sale agreement including, among other things, the condition of certain assets. In addition, Ecoserv has alleged that Newpark committed fraud in connection with the sale transaction.
Under the terms of the March 2014 sale of the Environmental Services business to Ecoserv, $8.0 million of the sales price was withheld and placed in an escrow account to satisfy claims for possible breaches of representations and warranties contained in the sale agreement. For the amount withheld in escrow, $4.0 million was scheduled for release to Newpark at each of the nine-month and 18-month anniversary of the closing. In December 2014, we received a letter from counsel for Ecoserv asserting that we had breached certain representations and warranties contained in the sale agreement including failing to disclose service work performed on injection/disposal wells and increased barge rental costs. The letter indicated that Ecoserv expected the costs associated with these claims to exceed the escrow amount. Following a further exchange of letters, in July of 2015, we filed the declaratory judgment action against Ecoserv referenced above. We believe there is no basis in the agreement or on the facts to support the claims asserted by Ecoserv and intend to vigorously defend our position while pursuing release of the entire $8.0 million escrow. The litigation remains in the discovery process with mediation currently scheduled in March of 2017.

consolidated financial statements.
ITEM 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
The information concerning mine safety violations and other regulatory matters required by section 1503 (a)Section 1503(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and Item 104 of Regulation S-K is included in Exhibit 95.1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, which is incorporated by reference.




PART II
ITEM 5. Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “NR.”
The following table sets forth the range of the high and low sales prices for our common stock for the periods indicated: 
Period High Low
2016    
Fourth Quarter $8.20
 $5.80
Third Quarter $7.72
 $5.48
Second Quarter $5.89
 $3.74
First Quarter $5.47
 $3.35
     
2015    
Fourth Quarter $6.60
 $4.83
Third Quarter $8.03
 $5.09
Second Quarter $10.61
 $7.43
First Quarter $9.85
 $8.34
As of February 1, 2017,2020, we had 1,3901,230 stockholders of record as determined by our transfer agent.
The following table details our repurchases of shares of our common stock for the three months ended December 31, 2016:
Period Total Number of
Shares Purchased (1)
 Average Price
per Share
 Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs Maximum Approximate Dollar Value of Shares and Convertible Notes due 2017 that May Yet be Purchased Under Plans or Programs
October 2016 303
 $7.30
 
 $33.5
November 2016 
 $
 
 $33.5
December 2016 
 
 
 $33.5
Total 303
 $7.30
 
  
(1)During the three months ended December 31, 2016, we purchased an aggregate of 303 shares surrendered in lieu of taxes under vesting of restricted stock awards.
Our Board of Directors has approved a repurchase program that authorizes us to purchase up to $100.0 million of our outstanding shares of common stock or outstanding Convertible Notes due 2017. The repurchase program has no specific term. We may repurchase shares or Convertible Notes due 2017 in the open market or as otherwise determined by management, subject to certain limitations under the ABL Facility and other factors. Repurchases are expected to be funded from operating cash flows and available cash on-hand. As part of the share repurchase program, our management has been authorized to establish trading plans under Rule 10b5-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
There were no share repurchases under the program during 2016. In February 2016, we repurchased $11.2 million of our Convertible Notes due 2017 in the open market for $9.2 million. This repurchase was made under our existing Board authorized repurchase program discussed above. At December 31, 2016, there was $33.5 million of authorization remaining under the program. In addition, the Board separately authorized the repurchase of $78.1 million of Convertible Notes due 2017 in connection with the December 2016 issuance of $100.0 million of Convertible Notes due 2021. During 2016, we repurchased 234,901 of shares surrendered in lieu of taxes under vesting of restricted stock awards. All of the shares repurchased are held as treasury stock.
We have not paid any dividends during the three most recent fiscal years or any subsequent interim period, and we do not intend to pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. In addition, our ABL Facility contains covenants which limit the payment of dividends on our common stock. See “Management's“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Liquidity and Capital Resources - Asset BasedAsset-Based Loan Facility.”


Stock Performance Graph
The following graph reflects a comparison of the cumulative total stockholder return of our common stock from January 1, 20122015 through December 31, 2016,2019, with the New York Stock Exchange Market Value Index, a broad equity market index, and the Morningstar Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Index, an industry group index. The graph assumes the investment of $100 on January 1, 20122015 in our common stock and each index and the reinvestment of all dividends, if any. This information shall be deemed furnished but not filed in this Form 10-K, and shall not be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Exchange Act of 1933, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent we specifically incorporate it by reference.
chart-e3216f0f29dd55b5bd5a02.jpg



Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The following table details our repurchases of shares of our common stock for the three months ended December 31, 2019:
Period Total Number of Shares Purchased Average Price Paid Per Share Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs Maximum Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet be Purchased Under Plans or Programs ($ in Millions)
October 2019 974
 $7.44
 
 $81.0
November 2019 5,471
 $6.76
 
 $81.0
December 2019 2,531
 $5.86
 
 $81.0
Total 8,976
 $6.58
 
  
During the three months ended December 31, 2019, we purchased an aggregate of 8,976 shares surrendered in lieu of taxes under vesting of restricted stock awards. During 2019, we purchased an aggregate of 381,041 shares surrendered in lieu of taxes under vesting of restricted stock awards. All of the shares purchased are held as treasury stock.
In November 2018, our Board of Directors authorized changes to our securities repurchase program. These changes increased the authorized amount under the repurchase program to $100.0 million, available for repurchases of any combination of our common stock and our 2021 Convertible Notes.
Our repurchase program authorizes us to purchase our outstanding shares of common stock or 2021 Convertible Notes in the open market or as otherwise determined by management, subject to certain limitations under the ABL Facility and other factors. The repurchase program has no specific term. Repurchases are expected to be funded from operating cash flows, available cash on hand, and borrowings under our ABL Facility. As part of the repurchase program, our management has been authorized to establish trading plans under Rule 10b5-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. There were no share repurchases under the program during the three months ended December 31, 2019. During 2019, we repurchased an aggregate of 2,537,833 shares of our common stock under our Board authorized repurchase program for a total cost of $19.0 million. All of the shares repurchased are held as treasury stock. As of December 31, 2019, we had $81.0 million remaining under the program.






ITEM 6. Selected Financial Data
The selected consolidated historical financial data presented below for the five years ended December 31, 20162019 is derived from our consolidated financial statements. The following data should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto in Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” and with Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Items 7 and 8 below.Operations.”
As of and for the Year Ended December 31,As of and for the Year Ended December 31,
(In thousands, except share data)2016 2015 2014 2013 20122019 2018 2017 2016 2015
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:                  
Revenues$471,496
 $676,865
 $1,118,416
 $1,042,356
 $983,953
$820,119
 $946,548
 $747,763
 $471,496
 $676,865
Operating income (loss)(57,213) (99,099) 130,596
 94,445
 92,275
10,395
 63,558
 31,436
 (57,213) (99,099)
Interest expense, net9,866
 9,111
 10,431
 11,279
 9,727
14,369
 14,864
 13,273
 9,866
 9,111
Income (loss) from continuing operations(40,712) (90,828) 79,009
 52,622
 50,453
(12,946) 32,281
 11,219
 (40,712) (90,828)
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
 
 1,152
 12,701
 9,579
Gain from disposal of discontinued operations, net of tax
 
 22,117
 
 
Loss from disposal of discontinued operations, net of tax
 
 (17,367) 
 
Net income (loss)(40,712) (90,828) 102,278
 65,323
 60,032
(12,946) 32,281
 (6,148) (40,712) (90,828)
                  
Basic income (loss) per share from continuing operations$(0.49) $(1.10) $0.95
 $0.62
 $0.58
Basic net income (loss) per share$(0.49) $(1.10) $1.23
 $0.77
 $0.69
Income (loss) per share from continuing operations - basic$(0.14) $0.36
 $0.13
 $(0.49) $(1.10)
Net income (loss) per share - basic$(0.14) $0.36
 $(0.07) $(0.49) $(1.10)
                  
Diluted income (loss) per share from continuing operations$(0.49) $(1.10) $0.84
 $0.56
 $0.53
Diluted net income (loss) per share$(0.49) $(1.10) $1.07
 $0.69
 $0.62
Income (loss) per share from continuing operations - diluted$(0.14) $0.35
 $0.13
 $(0.49) $(1.10)
Net income (loss) per share - diluted$(0.14) $0.35
 $(0.07) $(0.49) $(1.10)
                  
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:         
Consolidated Balance Sheets Data:         
Working capital$283,139
 $380,950
 $440,098
 $395,159
 $433,728
$349,947
 $381,386
 $346,623
 $283,139
 $380,950
Total assets798,183
 848,893
 1,007,672
 954,918
 979,750
900,079
 915,854
 902,716
 798,183
 848,893
Foreign bank lines of credit
 7,371
 11,395
 12,809
 2,546
4,849
 1,137
 1,000
 
 7,371
Other current debt83,368
 11
 253
 58
 53
1,486
 1,385
 518
 83,368
 11
Long-term debt, less current portion72,900
 171,211
 170,462
 170,009
 253,315
153,538
 159,225
 158,957
 72,900
 171,211
Stockholders' equity500,543
 520,259
 625,458
 581,054
 513,578
Stockholders’ equity548,645
 569,681
 547,480
 500,543
 520,259
                  
Consolidated Cash Flow Data:         
Net cash provided by operations$11,095
 $121,517
 $89,173
 $151,903
 $110,245
Consolidated Cash Flows Data:         
Net cash provided by operating activities$72,286
 $63,403
 $38,381
 $11,095
 $121,517
Net cash used in investing activities(28,260) (84,366) (14,002) (60,063) (96,167)(49,764) (55,752) (68,374) (38,320) (66,881)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities(650) (6,730) (49,158) (72,528) 5,853
Net cash used in financing activities(29,526) (4,513) (2,290) (650) (6,730)
DuringOperating income for 2019 includes an $11.4 million non-cash impairment of goodwill and a total of $11.8 million of charges associated with facility closures and related exit costs, inventory write-downs, and severance costs, as well as the modification of the Company’s retirement policy. Operating loss for 2016 and 2015 operating loss includes charges totaling $14.8 million and $80.5 million, respectively, resulting from the reduction in value of certain assets, the wind-down of our operations in Uruguay, and the resolution of certain wage and hour litigation claims. Charges inSuch charges for 2016 include $6.9 million of non-cash impairments in the Asia Pacific region, $4.1 million of charges for the reduction in carrying values of certain inventory, and $4.5 million of charges in the Latin America region associated with the wind-down of our operations in Uruguay, partially offset by a $0.7$0.7 million gain in 2016 associated with the change in final settlement amount of certain wage and hour litigation claims. Charges inSuch charges for 2015 include a $70.7 million non-cash impairment of goodwill, a $2.6 million non-cash impairment of assets, a $2.2 million charge to reduce the carrying value of inventory, and a $5.0 million charge for the resolution of certain wage and hour litigation claims and related costs.





ITEM 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion of our financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, and capital resources should be read togetherin conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statementsthe consolidated financial statements and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statementsnotes thereto included in Item 8 of this Annual Report.“Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”
Overview
We are a geographically diversified supplier providing products, as well as rentals and services primarily to the oil and natural gas exploration and production (“E&P”) industry. We operate our business through two reportable segments: Fluids Systems and Mats and Integrated Services.
Our Fluids Systems segment, which generated 84% of consolidated revenues in 2016, provides customized drilling fluids solutions to E&P customers globally, operating through four geographic regions: North America, Europe, the Middle East and Africa (“EMEA”), Latin America, and Asia Pacific.
International expansion is a key element of our corporate strategy. In recent years, we have been awarded multiple international contracts to provide drilling fluids and related services, primarily within the EMEA region, which have expanded our international presence, despite the continuing decline in global E&P drilling activity. Significant international contracts include:
A contract to provide drilling fluids and related services for a series of wells in the deepwater Black Sea. Work under this contract began in 2014 and was completed in early 2016.
A five year contract with Kuwait Oil Company (“Kuwait”) to provide drilling fluids and related services for land operations. Work under this contract began in the second half of 2014.
Lot 1 and Lot 3 of a restricted tender with Sonatrach to provide drilling fluids and related services, which expanded our market share with Sonatrach in Algeria. Work under this three-year contract began in the second quarter of 2015, with activity levels ramping up during the second half of 2015 and early 2016. In 2016, revenues under this contract represented approximately 14% of our consolidated revenues.
A contract with ENI S.p.A. for onshore and offshore drilling in the Republic of Congo. The initial term of this contract is three years and includes an extension option for up to an additional two years. Work under this contract began in the fourth quarter of 2015.
A contract with Total S.A. to provide drilling fluids and related services for an exploratory ultra-deepwater well in Block 14 of offshore Uruguay. This project began in March 2016 and was completed in the second quarter of 2016, contributing $12.3 million of revenue in 2016.
A two-year contract with Shell Oil in Albania to provide drilling fluids and related services for onshore drilling activity. Work under this contract started late in the second quarter of 2016.
A five-year contract with ENAP in Chile to provide drilling fluids and related services for onshore drilling activity. Work under this contract started late in the fourth quarter of 2016.
Total revenue generated under these contracts, including our prior contract with Sonatrach, was approximately $127.3 million in 2016, $98.4 million in 2015 and $64.1 million in 2014 despite being unfavorably impacted by foreign currency exchange attributableaddition to the strengthening of the U.S. dollar.
Also, in 2014 we announced two capital investment projects within the U.S operations ofE&P industry, our Fluids Systems segment. We have since completed the investment of approximately $24 million in our new fluids blending facility and distribution center located in Conroe, Texas, which will support the manufacturing of our proprietary fluid technologies, including our Evolution®, KronosTM, and FusionTM systems. In addition, we are investing approximately $38 million to significantly expand existing capacity and upgrade the drilling fluids blending, storage, and transfer capabilities in Fourchon, Louisiana, providing us with the required capacity and capabilities to serve customers in the Gulf of Mexico deepwater market. This project is part of our Fluids Systems strategy to penetrate the Gulf of Mexico deepwater market and is expected to be completed in the first half of 2017. Capital expenditures related to these projects totaled $25.6 million, $26.1 million and $3.9 million in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
Our Mats and Integrated Services segment which generated 16%serves a variety of consolidated revenues in 2016, provides composite mat rentals, well site construction and related site services to oil and gas customers. In addition, mat rental and services activity is expanding in other markets,industries, including the electrical transmission & distribution, pipeline, solar, petrochemical, and construction industries across the U.S., Canada and United Kingdom. Revenues from customers in markets other than oil and gas exploration represented approximately 60% of our rental and services revenues in 2016 compared to approximately one-third in 2015. We also sell composite mats to customers outside of the U.S. and to domestic customers outside of the oil and gas exploration market. Mat sales have been negatively impacted in recent years by lower demand from international oil and gas customers in the weak commodity price environment.


In March 2014, we completed the sale of our Environmental Services business, which was historically reported as a third operating segment, for $100 million in cash. The proceeds were used for general corporate purposes, including investments in our core drilling fluids and mats segments, along with share purchases under our share repurchase program. See “Note 14 - Discontinued Operations” in our Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.industries.
Our operating results, particularly for the Fluids Systems segment, depend to a large extent, on oil and natural gas drilling activity levels in the markets we serve and particularly for the Fluids Systems segment, the nature of the drilling operations (including the depth and whether the wells are drilled vertically or horizontally), which governs the revenue potential of each well. Drilling activity levels, in turn, dependsdepend on a variety of factors, including oil and natural gas commodity pricing, inventory levels, product demand, and regulatory restrictions. Oil and natural gas prices and activity are cyclical and volatile. Thisvolatile, and this market volatility has a significant impact on our operating results.
Beginning in the fourth quarterWhile our revenue potential is driven by a number of 2014 and continuing throughout 2015 and into early 2016, the price of oil declined dramatically from the price levels in recent years. As a result, E&P drilling activity significantly declined in North America and many global markets over this period. While oil prices have improved from the lows reached in the first quarter of 2016, price levels remain lower than in recent years. Rigfactors including those described above, rig count data isremains the most widely accepted indicator of drilling activity. Average North American rig count data for the last three years ended December 31 is as follows:
  Year Ended December 31, 2016 vs 2015 2015 vs 2014
  2016 2015 2014 Count % Count %
U.S. Rig Count 509
 978
 1,862
 (469) (48%) (884) (47%)
Canadian Rig Count 130
 192
 379
 (62) (32%) (187) (49%)
Total 639
 1,170
 2,241
 (531) (45%) (1,071) (48%)
  Year Ended December 31, 2019 vs 2018 2018 vs 2017
  2019 2018 2017 Count % Count %
U.S. Rig Count 943
 1,032
 877
 (89) (9%) 155
 18%
Canada Rig Count 134
 191
 206
 (57) (30%) (15) (7%)
North America Rig Count 1,077
 1,223
 1,083
 (146) (12%) 140
 13%
________________

Source: Baker Hughes IncorporatedCompany
The North AmericaDuring 2019, U.S. rig count continuallycounts steadily declined, in 2015 and early 2016, reachingexiting the year at 805 active rigs, a low pointdecline of 447 in May 2016, and has since recovered to 1,082278 rigs as(26%) from the end of 2018. As of February 17, 2017, including 751 rigs in14, 2020, the U.S. and 331 rigs in Canada.Canadian rig counts were 790 and 255, respectively. The Canadian rig count reflects the normal seasonality for this market, with the highest rig count levels generally observed in the first quarter of theeach year, prior to spring break up. With the improvement in rig counts from the lows reached in May 2016, average activity levels are expected to improve in 2017 compared to 2016 but remain below 2015 levels.
The lower E&P drilling activity levels in 2015 and 2016 reduced the demand for our services, negatively impacted customer pricing and resulted in elevated costs associated with workforce reductions, all of which negatively impacted our profitability. Further, due to the fact that our business contains substantial levels of fixed costs, including significant facility and personnel expenses, North American operating margins in both operating segments have been negatively impacted by the lower customer demand.
Spring break-up. Outside of North America, drilling activity is generally more stable as drilling activity in many countries is based upon longer termon longer-term economic projections and multiple yearmulti-year drilling programs, which tendtends to reduce the impact of short termshort-term changes in commodity prices on overall drilling activity. While
Segment Overview
Our Fluids Systems segment, which generated 76% of consolidated revenues for 2019, provides customized drilling, activitycompletion, and stimulation fluids solutions to E&P customers primarily in North America and Europe, the Middle East and Africa (“EMEA”), as well as certain countries in Asia Pacific and Latin America. International expansion, including the penetration of international oil companies (“IOCs”) and national oil companies (“NOCs”), is a key element of our international markets including BrazilFluids Systems strategy, which has historically helped to stabilize segment revenues, particularly as North American oil and Australia has declined dramatically, our internationalnatural gas exploration activities have continuedfluctuated significantly. Revenues from IOC and NOC customers represented approximately one-third of Fluids Systems segment revenues for 2019.


Significant international contract awards with recent developments include:
In Kuwait, we provide drilling and completion fluids and related services for land operations under a multi-year contract with Kuwait Oil Company (“KOC”), which began in 2014. Following a tender process with KOC, we received two new contract awards to growprovide drilling and completion fluids, along with related services, covering a five-year term which began in recent years driven primarilythe first quarter of 2019. The initial revenue value of the combined awards is approximately $165 million and expands our presence to include a second base of operations in Northern Kuwait. Based on the customer plans currently in place, we expect the revenue levels of the new awards to ultimately surpass the levels achieved on the previous contract; however, 2019 revenues from KOC were relatively consistent with 2018 levels, impacted in part by fluctuations during the contract transition.
In Algeria, we provide drilling and completion fluids and related services to Sonatrach under a multi-year contract. Work under Lot 1 and Lot 3 of a three-year contract awarded in 2015 (“2015 Contract”) was completed in the fourth quarter of 2018. During 2018, Sonatrach initiated a new tender (“2018 Tender”), for a three-year term succeeding the 2015 Contract. For the 2018 Tender, Sonatrach adopted a change in its procurement process, limiting the number of Lots that could be awarded to major service providers, which consequently reduced the potential revenue of the 2018 Tender as compared to the 2015 Contract. The contract awarded under the 2018 Tender is expected to generate revenue of approximately $125 million over the three-year term. Following the transition to the new contract awards described above, which include geographical expansion into new markets as well as market share gains in existing markets.late 2018, 2019 revenues from Sonatrach reflect a $26 million decline from 2018.
In responseAustralia, we provided drilling and completion fluids and related services under a contract with Baker Hughes Company, as part of its integrated service offering in support of the Greater Enfield project in offshore Western Australia. Work under this contract began in the first quarter of 2018 and was substantially completed in the third quarter of 2019.
In Brazil, we provided drilling fluids and related services under a multi-year contract with Petrobras which concluded in December 2018. For 2018, our Brazilian subsidiary generated revenues of $23 million and an operating loss of $1.4 million, substantially all of which related to the significant declines in industry activity in North America, we implemented cost reduction programs in 2015 including workforce reductions, reduced discretionary spending, and temporary salary freezes for substantially all employees, including executive officers. In September 2015, we also implemented a voluntary early retirement program with certain eligible employees in the United States.Petrobras contract. As a result of the further declinesconclusion of the Petrobras contract, we recognized charges of $1.2 million in activityBrazil during 2018 primarily related to severance costs associated with workforce reductions. In 2019, we maintained a reduced infrastructure in the Brazilian market to support our efforts to pursue contract opportunities in the offshore IOC market. During the fourth quarter of 2019, we made the decision to wind down our Brazil operations. For 2019, our Brazilian subsidiary generated revenues of $1 million and an operating loss of $4.1 million, including a charge of $0.7 million primarily related to severance costs and asset write-downs.
Our Fluids Systems business was also successful in securing other international tender awards in 2019, which are expected to begin in the first half of 2016,2020. These include a new three-year contract for combined drilling and completion fluids with ENI to support its offshore drilling campaign in Cyprus and a two-year contract with PTT Exploration and Production in Algeria. Both of these contracts are expected to begin in the first half of 2020, and combined generate additional revenues of $15 million to $20 million per year.
In addition to our international expansion efforts, we implemented further cost reduction actions including additional workforce reductionsare also selectively expanding our presence in North America, capitalizing on our capabilities, infrastructure, and beginningstrong market position in March 2016, a temporary salary reduction for a significant number ofthe North American employees, including executive officers, suspensionland drilling fluids markets, both through the geographic entry in the deepwater Gulf of the Company’s matching contribution to the U.S. defined contribution planMexico as well as a reduction in cash compensation paidthrough product line extensions into adjacent product offerings, including completion fluids and stimulation chemicals. To support this effort, we have incurred start-up costs, including costs associated with additional personnel and facility-related expenses, and have made additional capital investments. Revenues for drilling and completion fluids from the deepwater Gulf of Mexico increased to our Board of Directors in order$37 million for 2019 compared to further align our cost structure to activity levels. These temporary reductions are expected to remain in place until the second quarter of 2017.


$8 million for 2018.
As part of thesethe completion fluids product line extension, in October 2019, we acquired Cleansorb Limited (“Cleansorb”), a U.K. based provider of specialty chemicals for the oil and natural gas industry, which further expands our fluids technology portfolio and capabilities, for cash consideration of approximately $19 million. See Note 2 for additional information.
We continue to evaluate under-performing areas within our Fluids Systems business as well as opportunities to further enable a more efficient and scalable cost reduction programs, we reduced our North American employee base by 626 (approximately 48%) from the first quarter of 2015 through the third quarter of 2016, including reductions of 436 employees in 2015 and 190 employeesstructure, particularly in the first nine months of 2016. As a result of these termination programs,U.S. land market. During 2019, we recognized charges for employee termination coststook certain actions to reduce our workforce and cost structure as shownactivity levels declined, primarily in the table below:
 Year Ended December 31,
(In thousands)2016 2015
Fluids systems$4,125
 $7,218
Mats and integrated services285
 717
Corporate office162
 228
Total employee termination costs$4,572
 $8,163
During 2016U.S. land market and 2015, we also recorded charges totaling $14.8 million and $80.5 million, respectively, resulting from the reduction in value of certain assets, the wind-down of our operations in Uruguay and the resolution of certain wage and hour litigation claims. TheBrazil. Fluids Systems segment operating results included $15.5 million and $75.5 millionloss for 2019 includes a total of these charges in 2016 and 2015, respectively. The remaining $0.7 million gain and $5.0 million charge was included in Corporate Office expenses in 2016 and 2015, respectively, related to the resolution of certain wage and hour litigation claims.
The $15.5 million of Fluids Systems charges in 2016 includes $6.9 million of non-cash impairments in the Asia Pacific region resulting from the continuing unfavorable industry market conditions and the deteriorating outlook for the region, $4.1$6.8 million of charges forassociated with facility closures and related exit costs, inventory write-downs, and severance costs. In addition, due to the reductiondecline in carrying valuesdrilling activities and the projection of certain inventory, primarily resulting from lower of cost or market adjustments and $4.5 million of chargescontinued softness in the Latin America region associated with the wind-downU.S. land market, we recognized a non-cash charge of our operations in Uruguay, including $0.5$11.4 million to write-down property, plant and equipment. The $6.9 million of impairments in the Asia Pacific region includes a $3.8 million charge to write-down property, plant and equipment to its estimated fair value and a $3.1 million charge to fully impair the customer related intangible assets in the region.
The $75.5 millionfourth quarter of Fluids Systems charges in 2015 includes $70.7 million of non-cash charges2019 for the impairment of goodwill followingin the Fluids Systems business.
Our Mats and Integrated Services segment, which generated 24% of consolidated revenues for 2019, provides composite mat rentals utilized for temporary worksite access, along with related site construction and services to customers in various markets


including E&P, electrical transmission & distribution, pipeline, solar, petrochemical, and construction industries across North America and Europe. We also sell composite mats to customers around the world. The expansion of our rental and service activities in non-E&P markets remains a strategic priority for us due to the magnitude of this market growth opportunity, as well as the market’s relative stability compared to E&P. The Mats and Integrated Services segment rental and service revenues from non-E&P markets increased to approximately $65 million for 2019 compared to approximately $61 million for 2018. Product sales revenues largely reflect sales to non-E&P and international E&P markets, and typically fluctuate based on the timing of customer orders. Including product sales, total revenues to non-E&P markets represented approximately 55% of total segment revenues for 2019 compared to approximately half of total segment revenues for 2018.
In November 1, 2015 annual evaluation,2017, we acquired certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of Well Service Group, Inc. and Utility Access Solutions, Inc. (together, “WSG”) for approximately $77 million. Since 2012, WSG had been a $2.6 million non-cash impairmentstrategic logistics and installation service provider for our Mats and Integrated Service segment, offering a variety of assets, followingcomplementary services to our decisioncomposite matting systems, including access road construction, site planning and preparation, environmental protection, fluids and spill containment, erosion control, and site restoration services. The completion of the WSG acquisition expanded our service offering as well as our geographic footprint across the Northeast, Midwest, Rockies, and West Texas regions of the U.S. The WSG acquisition was the primary driver of the growth in service revenues for the Mats and Integrated Services segment for 2018 compared to exit a facility, and a $2.2 million charge to reduce the carrying value of diesel-based drilling fluid inventory, resulting from lower of cost or market adjustments.2017.



Year Ended December 31, 20162019 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 20152018
Consolidated Results of Operations
Summarized results of operations for the year ended December 31, 20162019 compared to the year ended December 31, 20152018 are as follows:
 Year Ended December 31, 2016 vs 2015
(In thousands)2016 2015  %
Revenues$471,496
 $676,865
 $(205,369) (30%)
Cost of revenues437,836
 599,013
 (161,177) (27%)
Selling, general and administrative expenses88,473
 101,032
 (12,559) (12%)
Other operating income, net(4,345) (2,426) (1,919) NM
Impairments and other charges6,745
 78,345
 (71,600) NM
Operating loss(57,213) (99,099) 41,886
 42%
        
Foreign currency exchange (gain) loss(710) 4,016
 (4,726) NM
Interest expense, net9,866
 9,111
 755
 8%
Gain on extinguishment of debt(1,615) 
 (1,615) NM
Loss from operations before income taxes(64,754) (112,226) 47,472
 NM
        
Benefit for income taxes(24,042) (21,398) (2,644) (12%)
Net loss$(40,712) $(90,828) $50,116
 NM


 Year Ended December 31, 2019 vs 2018
(In thousands)2019 2018  %
Revenues$820,119
 $946,548
 $(126,429) (13%)
Cost of revenues684,738
 766,975
 (82,237) (11%)
Selling, general and administrative expenses113,394
 115,127
 (1,733) (2%)
Other operating loss, net170
 888
 (718) NM
Goodwill impairment11,422
 
 11,422
 NM
Operating income10,395
 63,558
 (53,163) (84%)
        
Foreign currency exchange (gain) loss(816) 1,416
 (2,232) NM
Interest expense, net14,369
 14,864
 (495) (3%)
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes(3,158) 47,278
 (50,436) (107%)
        
Provision for income taxes9,788
 14,997
 (5,209) (35%)
Income (loss) from continuing operations$(12,946) $32,281
 $(45,227) (140%)
Revenues
Revenues decreased 30%13% to $471.5$820.1 million in 2016,for 2019, compared to $676.9$946.5 million in 2015.for 2018. This $205.4$126.4 million decrease includes a $189.1$77.9 million (43%(11%) decrease in revenues in North America, includingcomprised of a $169.0$49.6 million declinedecrease in ourthe Fluids Systems segment and a $20.1$28.3 million declinedecrease in ourthe Mats and Integrated Services segment. Revenues from our international operations decreased by $16.3$48.5 million (7%(19%), primarily driven by transitions in key contracts in Algeria and Brazil, as a $12.3 million revenue contribution from the offshore Uruguay project and activity gains in our EMEA region were more than offset by reduced drilling activity in Brazil and Asia Pacific, as well as a $12.0 million unfavorable impact of currency exchange related to the stronger U.S. dollar.described above. Additional information regarding the change in revenues is provided within the operating segment results below.
Cost of Revenuesrevenues
Cost of revenues decreased 27%11% to $437.8$684.7 million in 2016,for 2019, compared to $599.0$767.0 million in 2015. Thefor 2018. This $82.2 million decrease was primarily driven by the decline13% decrease in revenues described above, as well as $6.8 million of charges in the benefits of cost reduction programs, a $6.1 million reductionFluids Systems segment in depreciation expense2019 associated with the January 2016 change in estimated useful livesfacility closures and residual values of our composite mats rental fleetrelated exit costs, inventory write-downs, and a $2.0 million reduction in employee terminationseverance costs. These decreases were partially offset by a $1.9 million increase in inventory impairments primary resulting from lower of cost or market adjustments. Additional information regarding the change in cost of revenues is provided within the operating segment results below.
Selling, Generalgeneral and Administrative Expensesadministrative expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $12.6$1.7 million to $88.5$113.4 million in 2016 from $101.0for 2019, compared to $115.1 million in 2015. Thefor 2018. This decrease iswas primarily attributable to the benefits of cost reduction programs, a $2.4 million decline indriven by lower performance-based incentive compensation, partially offset by $4.0 million in charges associated with the February 2019 retirement policy modification (as discussed in Note 12), a $1.9$3.2 million declineincrease in spendingprofessional fees primarily related to legal matters, including the wage and hour litigation, a $1.6 million decrease in employee termination costs and lower spending onour long-term strategic planning projects.project and the Cleansorb acquisition, as well as higher personnel costs. Selling, general and administrative expenses for 2018 included a corporate office charge of $1.8 million associated with the retirement and transition of our former Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Chief Administrative Officer. Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues was 13.8% for 2019 compared to 12.2% for 2018.
Other Operating Income,operating loss, net
Other operating income was $4.3 million in 2016 as comparedloss for 2018 primarily relates to $2.4 million in 2015, primarily reflecting gains on the sale of assets in both periods. The increase is primarily attributableJuly 2018 fire at our Kenedy, Texas drilling fluids facility (see Note 16 for additional information).
Goodwill impairment
Goodwill impairment for 2019 relates to a $1.4 million increase in gains recognized on the sale of used composite mats from the rental fleet.
Impairments and Other Charges
During 2016, we recognized $6.7 million of impairments and other charges. These charges include $6.9 million of non-cash impairments in the Asia Pacific region of our Fluids Systems segment resulting from the continuing unfavorable industry market conditions and the deteriorating outlook for the region, reflecting a $3.8 millionimpairment charge to write-down property, plant and equipmentwrite-off the goodwill related to its estimated fair value and a $3.1 million charge to fully impair the customer related intangible assets in the region. In addition, we recorded a $0.5 million charge in the Latin America region of our Fluids Systems segment to write-down property, plant and equipment associated with the wind-down of our operations in Uruguay. These charges were partially offset by a $0.7 million gain in our corporate office associated with the change in the final settlement amount of the wage and hour litigation claims.
During the fourth quarter of 2015, we recognized $78.3 million of impairments and other charges including $70.7 million of non-cash charges in the Fluids Systems segment for the impairment of goodwill, following our annual evaluation and $2.6 million for the impairment of certain assets following our decision to exit a facility. In addition, corporate office expenses included a $5.0 million charge for the resolution of certain wage and hour litigation claims and related costs.
See “Notebusiness (see Note 5 – Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”, “Note 4 – Property, Plant and Equipment” and “Note 15 – Commitments and Contingencies” in our Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information related to these charges.information).
Foreign Currency Exchangecurrency exchange


Foreign currency exchange was a $0.7$0.8 million gain in 2016for 2019 compared to a $4.0$1.4 million loss in 2015,for 2018, and reflects the impact of currency translation on assets and liabilities (including intercompany balances) that are denominated in currencies other than functional currencies. The foreign exchange loss in 2015 was primarily due to the strengthening of the U.S. dollar against the Brazilian real. In September 2015, approximately 70% of the inter-company balances due from our Brazilian subsidiary with foreign currency exposure were forgiven, which reduced the foreign currency volatility in 2016 in comparison to 2015.


Interest expense, net
Interest expense which primarily reflects the 4% interest associated with our unsecured Convertible Notes due 2017, totaled $9.9was $14.4 million for 20162019 compared to $9.1$14.9 million for 2018. Interest expense for 2019 and 2018 includes $6.2 million and $5.5 million, respectively, in 2015. The increase in 2016 was primarily attributable to a non-cash chargenoncash amortization of $1.1 million in the second quarter of 2016 for the write-off oforiginal issue discount and debt issuance costs related to the termination and replacement of our revolving Credit Agreement partially offset by the benefit from the repurchase of $11.2 million of our Convertible Notes due 2017 in the first quarter of 2016. In December 2016, we issued $100 million of 4% Convertible Notes due 2021 and repurchased an additional $78.1 million of our Convertible Notes due 2017. As discussed further in Note 6 - Financing Arrangements in our Consolidated Financial Statements, interest expense associated with the Convertible Notes due 2021 will include the non-cash amortization of debt discount and deferred debt issuance costs which will increase our reported interest expense in 2017.
Gain on extinguishment of debt
The $1.6 million gain in 2016 reflects the difference in the amount paid and the net carrying value of the extinguished debt, including debt issuance costs, related to the repurchase of $89.3 million aggregate principal amount of our Convertible Notes due 2017.costs.
Provision for income taxes
The provision for income taxes was $9.8 million for 2016 was2019 despite reporting a $24.0small pretax loss for the year. This result reflects the impact of the $11.4 million benefit, reflecting an effectivenon-deductible goodwill impairment as well as the impact of the geographic composition of our pretax loss, where tax rate of 37.1%, comparedexpense related to a $21.4 million benefit in 2015, reflecting an effective tax rate of 19.1%. The benefit for income taxes in 2016 includes a $9.3 million benefit associated with a worthless stock deduction and related impactsearnings from restructuring the investment in our Brazilian subsidiary,international operations is only partially offset by the unfavorable impact of pretax losses incurred in Australia for which the recording of a tax benefit is not permitted.
The benefitfrom losses in the U.S. In addition, the provision for income taxes in 2015 was unfavorably impacted by the impairment of non-deductible goodwill. In addition, the 2015 income tax provision alsofor 2019 includes a $4.6$1.4 million charge for increasesprimarily related to the valuation allowance for certain deferred tax assets which may not be realized (primarily related to our Australian subsidiary andexpiration of certain U.S. state net operating losses). These 2015 charges were partially offsetloss carryforwards. The provision for income taxes was $15.0 million for 2018. The provision for income taxes for 2018 includes a $1.6 million net benefit related to U.S. tax reform and was also favorably impacted by a $4.4 million benefit associated withexcess tax benefits related to the forgivenessvesting of certain inter-company balances duestock-based compensation awards and a reduction in the valuation allowance related to our U.K. subsidiary.
Although the U.S. corporate statutory tax rate was reduced from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018, our provision for income taxes beginning in 2018 also includes the new tax on certain foreign-sourced earnings as well as any additional foreign withholding taxes related to future repatriation of current year earnings from our Brazilian subsidiarynon-U.S. subsidiaries. Due to the relative contribution of our domestic and a $2.2 million benefit fromforeign earnings, these taxes on certain foreign-sourced earnings effectively serve to increase our effective tax rate. Our effective tax rate in future periods will depend in large part on the releaserelative contribution of U.S. tax reserves following the expiration of statutes of limitation.our domestic and foreign earnings.



Operating Segment Results
Summarized financial information for our reportable segments is shown in the following table (net of inter-segment transfers):
Year ended December 31, 2016 vs 2015Year Ended December 31, 2019 vs 2018
(In thousands)2016 2015 $ %2019 2018 $ %
Revenues              
Fluids systems$395,461
 $581,136
 $(185,675) (32%)$620,317
 $715,813
 $(95,496) (13%)
Mats and integrated services76,035
 95,729
 (19,694) (21%)199,802
 230,735
 (30,933) (13%)
Total revenues$471,496
 $676,865
 $(205,369) (30%)$820,119
 $946,548
 $(126,429) (13%)
              
Operating income (loss)              
Fluids systems$(43,631) $(86,770) $43,139
  
$3,814
 $40,337
 $(36,523)  
Mats and integrated services14,741
 24,949
 (10,208)  
47,466
 60,604
 (13,138)  
Corporate office(28,323) (37,278) 8,955
  
(40,885) (37,383) (3,502)  
Operating loss$(57,213) $(99,099) $41,886
  
Total operating income$10,395
 $63,558
 $(53,163)  
              
Segment operating margin              
Fluids systems(11.0%) (14.9%)  
  
0.6% 5.6%  
  
Mats and integrated services19.4% 26.1%  
  
23.8% 26.3%  
  
Fluids Systems
Revenues
Total revenues for this segment consisted of the following:  
Year ended December 31, 2016 vs 2015Year Ended December 31, 2019 vs 2018
(In thousands)2016 2015 $ %2019 2018 $ %
United States$149,876
 $299,266
 $(149,390) (50%)$395,618
 $410,410
 $(14,792) (4%)
Canada33,050
 52,673
 (19,623) (37%)31,635
 66,416
 (34,781) (52%)
Total North America182,926
 351,939
 (169,013) (48%)427,253
 476,826
 (49,573) (10%)
Latin America40,736
 46,668
 (5,932) (13%)
Total Western Hemisphere223,662
 398,607
 (174,945) (44%)
              
EMEA167,130
 164,426
 2,704
 2%172,263
 192,537
 (20,274) (11%)
Asia Pacific4,669
 18,103
 (13,434) (74%)15,273
 17,733
 (2,460) (14%)
Total Eastern Hemisphere171,799
 182,529
 (10,730) (6%)
Latin America5,528
 28,717
 (23,189) (81%)
Total International193,064
 238,987
 (45,923) (19%)
              
Total Fluids Systems$395,461
 $581,136
 $(185,675) (32%)
Total Fluids Systems revenues$620,317
 $715,813
 $(95,496) (13%)
North AmericanAmerica revenues decreased 48%10% to $182.9$427.3 million in 2016,for 2019, compared to $351.9$476.8 million in 2015.for 2018. This decrease in revenues iswas primarily attributable to lower customer drilling activity in Canada, as reflected by the 45%30% decline in North Americanaverage rig count. Despite the 9% decline in the United States average rig count, along with lower pricing and customer spending per well, partially offset byrevenues in the U.S. only declined 4% benefiting from market share gains over this period.in the offshore Gulf of Mexico market as discussed above. For U.S. land markets, the revenue decrease was relatively in line with the average rig count, with a reduction from lower market share offset by an increase in footage drilled per rig due to improvements in customer drilling efficiency.
Internationally, revenues decreased 7%19% to $212.5$193.1 million in 2016for 2019, compared to $229.2$239.0 million in 2015, which included a $10.7 million reduction from currency rate changes compared to 2015. The increase in the EMEA regionfor 2018. This decrease was primarily driven by a $39.8 million increase for activity in Algeria, Kuwait, and the Republic of the Congo, partially offset by a $16.6 million decrease following the completion of customer drilling activity in the deepwater Black Sea and other reductions in customer drilling activity related to the current commodity price environment, as well as an $8.5 million reduction from the impact of currency exchange. The decrease in revenues in Latin America is primarily attributable to declines related to the contract transitions described above in Petrobras drillingAlgeria, Brazil, and offshore Australia as well as lower customer activity in BrazilRomania and the impact of currency exchangeAlbania, partially offset by the $12.3 million revenue contribution from the offshore Uruguay project in the first half of 2016. The decline in Asia Pacific isgrowth across several EMEA countries, primarily attributable to reduced drilling activity in Australia.reflecting market share gains with IOC and NOC customers.


Operating Incomeincome
The Fluids Systems segment incurred angenerated operating lossincome of $43.6$3.8 million in 2016for 2019 compared to $40.3 million for 2018. Fluids Systems operating income for 2019 includes an operating loss$11.4 million non-cash impairment of $86.8 million in 2015. The operating losses in 2016goodwill and 2015 included $15.5 million and $75.5a total of $7.3 million of charges respectively,associated with facility closures and related exit costs, inventory write-downs, and severance costs, as well as the modification of the Company’s retirement policy. Operating income for 2018 included a total of $5.0 million of charges associated with severance costs, the impairmentKenedy, Texas facility fire, and expenses related to the upgrade and conversion of assets as discussed above. The remaining $16.8 million net increasea drilling fluids facility into a completion fluids facility. Excluding these charges, the decrease in operating loss in 2016 compared to 2015income includes a $13.3$10.8 million increase indecline from North American operating lossoperations and a $3.5 million decrease in international operating income. The increase in North American operating loss is largely attributable to the $169.0$11.8 million decline from international operations. This decline in revenues described above, partially offset by the benefits of cost reduction programs and a $3.1 million reduction in employee termination costs. The $3.5 million decrease in international operating income is primarily attributable to an unfavorable changethe decreases in customer mix in EMEA along with the revenue declines in Asia Pacific and Latin America and a $1.8 million negative impact of currency exchange.revenues described above.
As noted above, after reaching a low point in May 2016, North American drilling activity steadily improved throughout the remainder of 2016 and into early 2017. As such, we expect average drilling activity levels in 2017 to improve compared to full year 2016, but remain below 2015 levels. While we have executedtaken certain actions to reduce our workforce and cost structure across each of our regions,as activity levels have declined, our business contains substantialhigh levels of fixed costs, including significant facility and personnel expenses. While we expect North American operating resultsWe continue to improveevaluate under-performing areas as well as opportunities to further enable a more efficient and scalable cost structure. In the absence of a longer-term increase in 2017 compared to 2016 in connection with the anticipated improvement in North American land activity levels or market share, we may incur future charges related to further cost reduction efforts or potential asset impairments, which may negatively impact our future results.
As discussed above, we made the decision during the fourth quarter of 2019 to wind down our Brazil operations. We may incur additional operating losses and asset write-downs as we wind down these operations. In addition, at December 31, 2019, we had $10.3 million of accumulated translation losses related to our ability to penetrate the Gulf of Mexico deepwater market, activity levels remain subject to the level and stability of commodity prices. Outside of North America, improvements in operating results will largely depend on further recovery in commodity prices.


Also, in recent years, the business environmentsubsidiary in Brazil, has become increasingly challenging, particularly as Petrobras, our primary customerthat are reflected in the region, has focused more efforts on well completionsaccumulated other comprehensive loss in stockholders’ equity. Accounting guidance requires that we reclassify these accumulated translation losses and workover activities and less on drilling activities. More recently, the widely-publicized corruption investigation involving Petrobras and elected officials has ledrecognize a charge to further delays in decision-making and drilling activities. The unstable political environment, including the impeachment of the President of the country, has contributed to a generally unfavorable business environment. We expect all of these developments to continue to disrupt Petrobras’ operations in the near term. In response to these changes in the business environment,income at such time when we have taken actions to reducesubstantially liquidated the cost structure of this operation and are continuing to evaluate further actions. While the Brazilian deepwater drilling market remains an important componentassets of our long-term strategy, the profitability of our businesssubsidiary in Latin America remains highly dependent on increasing levels of drilling activity by Petrobras and other E&P customers.Brazil.
Mats and Integrated Services
Revenues
Total revenues for this segment consisted of the following:  
 Year ended December 31, 2016 vs 2015
(In thousands)2016 2015  %
Mat rental and services$58,389
 $73,037
 $(14,648) (20%)
Mat sales17,646
 22,692
 (5,046) (22%)
Total$76,035
 $95,729
 $(19,694) (21%)
 Year Ended December 31, 2019 vs 2018
(In thousands)2019 2018  %
Rental and service revenues$143,337
 $174,840
 $(31,503) (18%)
Product sales revenues56,465
 55,895
 570
 1%
Total Mats and Integrated Services revenues$199,802
 $230,735
 $(30,933) (13%)
Mat rentalRental and servicesservice revenues decreased $14.618% to $143.3 million for 2019, compared to 2015. The$174.8 million for 2018, which includes a decrease is primarily due toin revenues from E&P customers of approximately $35.0 million, resulting from lower U.S. drilling and pressure pumping activity and weakness in North American drilling markets, including the U.S. Northeast region which has historically been the segment’s largest rental market. A 49%natural gas prices. This decline in the U.S. Northeast region's drilling activity, along with a significant decline in completions activity, has resulted in lower rental fleet utilization and customer pricing from prior year levels. The revenue decline from North American drilling markets was partially offset by a $5.7an increase of approximately $3.5 million increase in revenues from non-E&P customers in North Americarental and Europe.
service revenues. Revenues from matproduct sales declined by $5.0 million compared to 2015increased 1% and typically fluctuate based on the timing of mat orders from customers.
As described above, due to the weakness in E&P customer activity, we continue to increase efforts to expand into applications in other markets, including electrical transmission & distribution, pipelines, solar, petrochemicalOperating income
The Mats and construction. Revenues from customers in these markets represented approximately 70%Integrated Services segment generated operating income of total segment revenues in 2016$47.5 million for 2019 compared to approximately half in 2015.
Operating Income
Segment operating income declined by $10.2$60.6 million to $14.7 million in 2016, as compared to $24.9 million in 2015, largelyfor 2018, primarily attributable to the declinechange in revenues as described above. Due toThe benefit from the relatively fixed naturehigher contribution of operating expensesproduct sales revenue in our rental business, declines in rental and services revenue have a higher decremental impact on the segment's operating margin. The impact of lower revenue2019 was partially offset by a $6.1 million reduction in depreciation expense and a $1.4 millionlower average rental pricing primarily from the increase in gains recognized on the sale of used composite mats from ournon-E&P rental fleet. The reduction in depreciation expense was a result of a change in estimated useful lives and residual values of our composite mats included in rental fleet fixed assets as further discussed in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
We completed the expansion of our mat manufacturing facility in 2015, significantly increasing our production capacity. While the expansion project relieved production capacity constraints that previously limited our revenues, the lower commodity price environment resulted in lower drilling activity for our E&P customers and reduced demand for our products and services. While we expect our North American E&P markets to continue to recover in 2017, our manufacturing facility remains well below historical production levels and the business contains substantial levels of fixed costs, including significant facility and personnel expenses. As such, improvements in segment operating margins will depend on the level of customer demand and the competitive pricing environment in 2017 as well as costs associated with additional personnel to support our ability to further expand into applications in other markets.strategic growth initiatives.


Corporate officeOffice
Corporate office expenses decreased $9.0increased $3.5 million to $28.3$40.9 million for 2019 compared to $37.4 million for 2018. This increase was primarily driven by $3.4 million in 2016, compared to $37.3 million in 2015. The decrease is primarily attributable to a $5.7 million improvement from the settlement of the wage and hour litigation claims as described above and a $2.0 million decrease in legal costs, primarilycharges associated with such claims.the February 2019 retirement policy modification, as discussed in Note 12. The remaining $1.3change primarily reflects a $3.2 million decrease isincrease in professional fees primarily attributablerelated to reduced spending onour long-term strategic projectsplanning project and the benefitsCleansorb acquisition, as well as higher severance and personnel costs, partially offset by lower performance-based incentive compensation. In addition, 2018 included a $1.8 million charge associated with the retirement and transition of cost reduction programs.our former Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Chief Administrative Officer.





Year Ended December 31, 20152018 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 20142017
Consolidated Results of Operations
Summarized results of operations for the year ended December 31, 20152018 compared to the year ended December 31, 20142017 are as follows:
 Year Ended December 31, 2015 vs 2014
(In thousands)2015 2014  %
Revenues$676,865
 $1,118,416
 $(441,551) (39%)
Cost of revenues599,013
 876,999
 (277,986) (32%)
Selling, general and administrative expenses101,032
 112,648
 (11,616) (10%)
Other operating income, net(2,426) (1,827) (599) (33%)
Impairments and other charges78,345
 
 78,345
 NM
Operating income (loss)(99,099) 130,596
 (229,695) (176%)
        
Foreign currency exchange loss4,016
 108
 3,908
 NM
Interest expense, net9,111
 10,431
 (1,320) (13%)
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes(112,226) 120,057
 (232,283) (193%)
        
Provision (benefit) for income taxes(21,398) 41,048
 (62,446) (152%)
Income (loss) from continuing operations(90,828) 79,009
 (169,837) (215%)
        
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
 1,152
 (1,152) (100%)
Gain from disposal of discontinued operations, net of tax
 22,117
 (22,117) (100%)
Net income (loss)$(90,828) $102,278
 $(193,106) (189%)
 Year Ended December 31, 2018 vs 2017
(In thousands)2018 2017  %
Revenues$946,548
 $747,763
 $198,785
 27%
Cost of revenues766,975
 607,899
 159,076
 26%
Selling, general and administrative expenses115,127
 108,838
 6,289
 6%
Other operating (income) loss, net888
 (410) 1,298
 NM
Operating income63,558
 31,436
 32,122
 102%
        
Foreign currency exchange loss1,416
 2,051
 (635) NM
Interest expense, net14,864
 13,273
 1,591
 12%
Income from continuing operations before income taxes47,278
 16,112
 31,166
 193%
        
Provision for income taxes14,997
 4,893
 10,104
 206%
Income from continuing operations32,281
 11,219
 21,062
 188%
        
Loss from disposal of discontinued operations, net of tax
 (17,367) 17,367
 NM
Net income (loss)$32,281
 $(6,148) $38,429
 NM
Revenues
Revenues decreased 39%increased 27% to $676.9$946.5 million in 2015,for 2018, compared to $1,118.4$747.8 million in 2014.for 2017. This $441.6$198.8 million decreaseincrease includes a $391.4$177.6 million (47%(34%) decreaseincrease in revenues in North America, including a $335.0comprised of an $81.4 million declineincrease in ourthe Fluids Systems segment and a $56.4$96.2 million declineincrease in ourthe Mats and Integrated Services segment. Revenues from our international operations decreasedincreased by $50.2$21.2 million (17%(9%), as activity gainsprimarily driven by increases in our Asia Pacific and EMEA region were more thanregions, partially offset by the unfavorable impact of currency exchange related to the strengthening U.S. dollar, along with reduced drilling activitya decrease in Brazil and Asia Pacific.our Latin America region. Additional information regarding the change in revenues is provided within the operating segment results below.
Cost of Revenuesrevenues
Cost of revenues decreased 32%increased 26% to $599.0$767.0 million in 2015,for 2018, compared to $877.0$607.9 million for 2017. This $159.1 million increase in 2014. The decrease iscost of revenues was primarily driven by the decline27% increase in revenues and the benefits of cost reduction programs taken in 2015, partially offset by charges in 2015 for approximately $5.7 millionas well as costs associated with employee termination costs and $2.2 million for lower of cost orour North American market adjustments to diesel-based drilling fluid inventories recognized in the fourth quarter of 2015. Additional information regarding the change in cost of revenues is provided within the operating segment results below.
Selling, General and Administrative Expensesexpansion efforts.
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $11.6
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $6.3 million to $101.0$115.1 million for 2018, compared to $108.8 million for 2017. The increase in 2015 from $112.6 millionexpenses was primarily driven by the growth in 2014. The decrease is primarilythe Mats and Integrated Services segment, including costs attributable to the WSG acquisition. Selling, general and administrative expenses also includes a $6.9corporate office charge of $1.8 million decline in performance-basedassociated with the retirement and transition of our former Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Chief Administrative Officer, primarily reflecting the impact of modifications to certain outstanding stock-based and other incentive compensation, the benefits of cost reduction programs taken in 2015, and $2.0 million inawards. In addition, lower spending related to legal matters, strategic planning projects,efforts, and performance-based incentive compensation were partially offset by higher severance costs and other increases in personnel costs. Selling, general and administrative expenses as a $1.9 million increase in costspercentage of revenues decreased to 12.2% for legal matters, including the wage and hour litigation, and a $1.9 million increase in employee termination costs.2018 from 14.6% for 2017.
Other Operating Income,operating (income) loss, net
Other operating income was $2.4 million in 2015 as compared to $1.8 million in 2014 largely reflecting gains recognized on the sale of assets in both periods.


Impairments and Other Charges
During the fourth quarter of 2015, a total of $78.3 million of charges were recordedloss for the impairment of certain assets and the resolution of certain wage and hour litigation claims. These charges include a $70.7 million non-cash impairment of goodwill related2018 primarily relates to the Fluids Systems segment and a $2.6 million non-cash impairment of assets, followingJuly 2018 fire at our decision to exit aKenedy, Texas drilling fluids facility. In addition, we recognized a $5.0 million charge in December 2015 reflecting the estimated resolution of certain wage and hour litigation claims and related costs. See “Note 5 – Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”, “Note 4 – Property, Plant and Equipment” and “Note 15 – Commitments and Contingencies” in our Consolidated Financial Statementsfacility (see Note 16 for additional information related to these charges.information).
Foreign Currency Exchangecurrency exchange
Foreign currency exchange was a $4.0$1.4 million loss in 2015,for 2018 compared to a $0.1$2.1 million loss in 2014. The currency exchange loss in 2015 primarilyfor 2017, and reflects the impact of the strengthening U.S. dollarcurrency translation on assets and liabilities (including intercompany balances) held in our international operations, particularly Brazil, that are denominated in currencies other than functional currencies. In September 2015, approximately 70% of the intercompany balances due from our Brazilian subsidiary with foreign currency exposure were forgiven.


Interest expense, net
Interest expense which primarily reflects the 4% interest associated with the Convertible Notes due 2017, totaled $9.1was $14.9 million for 20152018 compared to $10.4$13.3 million for 2017. Interest expense for 2018 and 2017 includes $5.5 million and $5.3 million, respectively, in 2014.noncash amortization of original issue discount and debt issuance costs. The decreaseincrease in 2015interest expense was primarily attributablerelated to lowerhigher average borrowingsoutstanding debt in 2018 compared to 2017, along with an increase in average borrowing rates on our international subsidiaries.ABL Facility.
Provision for income taxes
The provision for income taxes was $15.0 million for 2015 was a $21.4 million benefit,2018, reflecting an effective tax rate of 19.1%32%, compared to a $41.0$4.9 million expense in 2014,for 2017, reflecting an effective tax rate of 34.2%30%. The decreaseprovision for income taxes for 2018 includes a $1.6 million net benefit related to U.S. tax reform and was also favorably impacted by excess tax benefits related to the vesting of certain stock-based compensation awards and a reduction in the valuation allowance related to our U.K. subsidiary. The provision for income taxes in 2017 includes a $3.4 million benefit resulting from the provisional accounting related to U.S. tax reform. The 2017 effective tax rate iswas negatively impacted primarily relatedby non-deductible expenses relative to the impairmentamount of non-deductible goodwill in 2015. In 2015, the income tax provision alsopre-tax income.
Loss from disposal of discontinued operations
Loss from disposal of discontinued operations includes a $4.4 million benefit associated with the forgiveness of certain inter-company balances due from our Brazilian subsidiary and a $2.2 million benefit from the release of U.S. tax reserves, following the expiration of statutes of limitation. In addition, the 2015 income tax provision includes a $4.6$17.4 million charge, net of tax, in 2017 for increases to the valuation allowance for certain deferred tax assets, primarilysettlement of a litigation matter related to our Australian subsidiary and certain U.S. state net operating losses, which may not be realized, as well as a $1.6 million charge relating to management’s election to carry back the 2015 U.S. federal tax losses to prior years.
Discontinued operations
Income from our discontinued Environmental Services operations that was sold in March 2014 was $1.2 million in 2014.  In addition, 2014 includes a $22.1 million gain from the March 2014 sale of the business as described above.our Environmental Services business. See “Note 14 - Discontinued Operations” in our Consolidated Financial StatementsNote 15 and Note 16 for additional information.



Operating Segment Results
Summarized financial information for our reportable segments is shown in the following table (net of inter-segment transfers): 
Year ended December 31, 2015 vs 2014Year Ended December 31, 2018 vs 2017
(In thousands)2015 2014 $ %2018 2017 $ %
Revenues              
Fluids systems$581,136
 $965,049
 $(383,913) (40%)$715,813
 $615,803
 $100,010
 16%
Mats and integrated services95,729
 153,367
 (57,638) (38%)230,735
 131,960
 98,775
 75%
Total revenues$676,865
 $1,118,416
 $(441,551) (39%)$946,548
 $747,763
 $198,785
 27%
              
Operating income (loss)              
Fluids systems$(86,770) $95,600
 $(182,370)  
$40,337
 $27,580
 $12,757
  
Mats and integrated services24,949
 70,526
 (45,577)  
60,604
 40,491
 20,113
  
Corporate office(37,278) (35,530) (1,748)  
(37,383) (36,635) (748)  
Operating income (loss)$(99,099) $130,596
 $(229,695)  
Total operating income$63,558
 $31,436
 $32,122
  
              
Segment operating margin              
Fluids systems(14.9%) 9.9%  
  
5.6% 4.5%  
  
Mats and integrated services26.1% 46.0%  
  
26.3% 30.7%  
  
Fluids Systems
Revenues
Total revenues for this segment consisted of the following:  
Year ended December 31, 2015 vs 2014Year Ended December 31, 2018 vs 2017
(In thousands)2015 2014 $ %2018 2017 $ %
United States$299,266
 $607,411
 $(308,145) (51%)$410,410
 $341,075
 $69,335
 20%
Canada52,673
 79,516
 (26,843) (34%)66,416
 54,322
 12,094
 22%
Total North America351,939
 686,927
 (334,988) (49%)476,826
 395,397
 81,429
 21%
Latin America46,668
 84,555
 (37,887) (45%)
Total Western Hemisphere398,607
 771,482
 (372,875) (48%)
              
EMEA164,426
 166,000
 (1,574) (1%)192,537
 179,360
 13,177
 7%
Asia Pacific18,103
 27,567
 (9,464) (34%)17,733
 4,081
 13,652
 335%
Total Eastern Hemisphere182,529
 193,567
 (11,038) (6%)
Latin America28,717
 36,965
 (8,248) (22%)
Total International238,987
 220,406
 18,581
 8%
              
Total Fluids Systems$581,136
 $965,049
 $(383,913) (40%)
Total Fluids Systems revenues$715,813
 $615,803
 $100,010
 16%
North AmericanAmerica revenues decreased 49%increased 21% to $351.9$476.8 million in 2015,for 2018, compared to $686.9$395.4 million in 2014.for 2017. This decrease in revenues isincrease was primarily attributable to the 48% decline13% increase in North AmericanAmerican average rig count along with pricing declines,market share gains in both the North American land markets and the offshore Gulf of Mexico market.
Internationally, revenues increased 8% to $239.0 million for 2018, compared to $220.4 million for 2017. This increase was primarily attributable to a $15.0 million improvement in Romania, as higher oil prices resulted in an increase in drilling activity, along with a $13.4 million increase in Australia related to the Baker Hughes Greater Enfield project, as well as increased activity in Albania and Germany, partially offset by market share gains over this period. In addition, revenues in Canada included an $8 million reductiondeclines from the unfavorable impact of currency exchange related to the strengthening U.S. dollar.
Internationally, revenues decreased 18% to $229.2 million in 2015, as compared to $278.1 million in 2014, with activity gains in our EMEA region being more than offset by the unfavorable impact of currency exchange related to the strengthening U.S. dollar, along with reduced drilling activity in Brazil, and Asia Pacific. The decline in revenues in the EMEA region included a $34 million reduction from the impact of currency exchange, partially offset by a $31 million increase in revenues from activity in Kuwait, the deepwater Black Sea, Algeria, and the Republic of Congo. The decrease in revenues in Latin America is primarily attributable to lower customer drilling activity and $19 million from the negative impact of currency exchange. The decline in Asia Pacific is primarily related to lower revenues for land drilling customers, along with a $4 million negative impact from currency exchange.Italy.
Operating Incomeincome
The Fluids Systems segment incurred an operating loss of $86.8 million in 2015, compared togenerated operating income of $95.6$40.3 million in 2014.for 2018 compared to $27.6 million for 2017. The operating loss in 2015 includes $75.5 million of charges for the impairment of goodwill and other assets as discussed above. The remaining changeincrease in operating resultsincome includes a $110.7an $8.7 million decreaseimprovement from North American operations, largely attributable toreflecting the declineincremental income generated from the $81.4 million increase in revenues describeddiscussed above, alongpartially offset by an increase in operating expenses. Operating expenses for 2018 include $3.0 million of charges primarily related to severance costs associated with $7.2cost optimization efforts, $0.8 million of charges associated with employee terminationthe Kenedy, Texas facility fire, as well as increased start-up costs partially offset byassociated with our product line expansion into stimulation chemicals and completion fluids, including $1.1 million of non-capitalizable expenses


related to the benefitsupgrade and conversion of cost reduction programs.a drilling fluids facility into a completion fluids facility. Operating income from international operations increased $3.8by $4.0 million, primarily reflectingrelated to the benefit of improved profitabilityincrease in the EMEA and Latin America regions,revenues described above, partially offset by the negative impact of currency exchangea $1.2 million charge in Brazil primarily related to severance costs associated with workforce reductions, as well as a small operating loss in Asia Pacific.discussed above.
Mats and Integrated Services
Revenues
Total revenues for this segment consisted of the following:  
 Year ended December 31, 2015 vs 2014
(In thousands)2015 2014  %
Mat rental and services$73,037
 $125,861
 $(52,824) (42%)
Mat sales22,692
 27,506
 (4,814) (18%)
Total$95,729
 $153,367
 $(57,638) (38%)
 Year Ended December 31, 2018 vs 2017
(In thousands)2018 2017  %
Rental and service revenues$174,840
 $96,067
 $78,773
 82%
Product sales revenues55,895
 35,893
 20,002
 56%
Total Mats and Integrated Services revenues$230,735
 $131,960
 $98,775
 75%
Mat rentalRental and servicesservice revenues decreased $52.8increased $78.8 million to $174.8 million for 2018 compared to 2014. The decrease is$96.1 million for 2017, primarily due to weaknessthe WSG acquisition completed in November 2017, as well as increased customer activity in pressure pumping applications and the Northeast U.S. region, the segment’s largestimpact of our continuing efforts to expand into non-E&P rental market, as a 31% decline in this region's drilling activity along with a significant decline in completions activity has resulted in lower rental fleet utilization and customer pricing from prior year levels. In addition, 2014 results benefitted from a large site preparation project in the Gulf Coast region that did not recur. Matmarkets. Product sales decreased by $4.8revenues were $55.9 million for 2018 compared to 2014.


$35.9 million for 2017. Revenues from product sales typically fluctuate based on the timing of mat orders from customers; however, the improvement in 2018 was primarily attributable to our continued efforts to expand our sales into non-E&P markets.
Operating Incomeincome
SegmentThe Mats and Integrated Services segment generated operating income decreased by $45.6of $60.6 million for 2018 compared to $24.9$40.5 million for 2017, primarily attributable to the increases in revenues as described above. Revenues associated with the WSG acquisition primarily consist of site services, as opposed to product sales and rentals, which has shifted the revenue mix toward service revenues in 2018, as compared to $70.5 million2017. While the incremental service revenues provided a positive impact to segment operating income, this shift in 2014, largely attributablerevenue mix, along with depreciation and amortization expense related to the decline in rental and services revenue described above. Due topurchase accounting allocation, reduced the relatively fixed nature of operating expenses in our rental business, including depreciation expense associated with our mat rental fleet, declines in rental and services revenue have a higher decremental impact on theoverall segment operating margin. In additionmargin in 2018 as compared to the impact2017. See Note 2 for further discussion of the lower revenue, operating income was further impacted by costs associated with the start-up of our expanded manufacturing facility and lower utilization of our production capacity compared to 2014.acquisition.
Corporate officeOffice
Corporate office expenses increased $0.7 million to $37.4 million for 2018 compared to $36.6 million for 2017. This increase was primarily driven by a $1.8 million to $37.3 millioncharge in 2015, compared to $35.5 million in 2014. The increase is2018 associated with the retirement and transition of our former Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Chief Administrative Officer, primarily attributable to a $5 million charge reflecting the estimated resolutionimpact of modifications to certain wageoutstanding stock-based and hour litigation claims as described above and $2.4 million of increased costsother incentive awards. In addition, lower spending related to legal matters, including the wagestrategic planning efforts, and hour litigation claims,performance-based incentive compensation were partially offset by $2.0 millionan increase in reduced spending related to strategic planning projects and $1.3 million in lower performance-based incentive compensation along with workforce reductions and other cost control efforts.personnel costs.



Liquidity and Capital Resources
Net cash provided by operating activities during 2016 totaled $11.1was $72.3 million for 2019 compared to $121.5$63.4 million during 2015. In 2016,for 2018. The $8.9 million increase in net loss adjusted for non-cash itemscash provided cash of $23.2 million, while changes inby operating assets used $12.1 million, including $9.0 million from the increase to U.S. income tax receivables related to the carryback of U.S. federal tax losses incurred in 2016. The operating cash flow generated in 2015activities was primarily attributable to the decrease in working capital resulting from the 2019 decline in revenues, related topartially offset by the slow-downimpact from the lower cash generated from operating results. During 2019, net income adjusted for non-cash items provided cash of $50.2 million, while changes in North American drilling activity.working capital provided cash of $22.1 million. During 2018, net income adjusted for non-cash items provided cash of $94.7 million, while changes in working capital used cash of $31.3 million.
Net cash used in investing activities during 2016 was $28.3$49.8 million for 2019, including capital expenditures of $38.4$44.8 million as well as $4.4and $18.7 million to fundassociated with the acquisition of Pragmatic Drilling Fluids Additives, Ltd. These outflows wereCleansorb, partially offset by a $10.1$13.7 million reduction in restricted cash and $4.5 million of proceeds from the sale of assets. Capital expenditures during 2019 included $23.5 million for the Mats and Integrated Services segment, including $15.5 million of investments in 2016 included $32.3the mat rental fleet, and $18.4 million infor the Fluids Systems segment,segment. These capital expenditures were partially offset by the proceeds from elevated sales of mats from the rental fleet. Net cash used in investing activities was $55.8 million for 2018, including a total$14 million payment to refund a portion of $27.8 million related to the facility upgrade and expansionnet sales price of our Fourchon, Louisiana facility, our new fluids blending facility and distribution center in Conroe, Texas, and equipment to support the contract with Total S.A. in Uruguay. Capital expenditures in the Mats & IntegratedEnvironmental Services segment totaled $4.6 million in 2016, mainly associated with additions to the mat rental fleet.business (see Note 16 for further discussion).
Net cash used in financing activities during 2016 was $0.7 million. Cash used$29.5 million for 2019, which includes $19.0 million in financing activities includes $87.3share purchases under our repurchase program and a net payment of $11.3 million used for the repurchase of $89.3 million aggregate principal amount ofon our Convertible Notes due 2017 and net repayments on foreign lines of credit of $7.8 million. These cash outflows were largely offset by the net proceeds from the December 2016 issuance of the Convertible Notes due 2021.ABL Facility.
We anticipate that our future working capital requirements for our operations will fluctuate directionally with revenues. In addition, we expect total 20172020 capital expenditures to range between $15 millionbe below 2019 levels, depending in part on the investment requirements to $20 million,support further growth in the mats rental business, as well as investment requirements for IOC and NOC contracts in the Fluids Systems business, including remaining expenditures for the completiontiming of investment to support the facility upgrade and expansion of our Fourchon, Louisiana facility serving the Gulf of Mexico deepwater market.
As of December 31, 2016, we had cash on-hand of $87.9 million, of which $44.0 million resides within our international subsidiaries that we intend to leave permanently reinvested abroad. In the first half of 2017,latest KOC contract described above, where we expect to receiveinvest approximately $8 million to construct a cash refund for income taxessecond base of approximately $38.0 million upon filing amended returns to carryback the U.S. federal tax losses incurred in 2016. In addition, availabilityoperations. Availability under our ABL Facility subject to covenant compliance and certain restrictionsalso provides additional liquidity as discussed further below, also provides additional liquidity. Availabilitybelow. Total availability under the ABL Facility was $76.3 million as of January 1, 2017 and will fluctuate directionally based on the level of eligible accounts receivable, inventory, and, subject to satisfaction of certain financial covenants as described below, composite mats included in the rental fleet.
We expect our available cash on-hand, cash generated by operations, including U.S. income tax refunds, and estimatedremaining availability under our ABL Facility to be adequate to fund current operations during the next 12 months and the June 2017 provision relatedmonths. In addition, we may continue to the maturity ofpurchase our common stock or 2021 Convertible Notes due 2017 as discussed further below.


under our existing repurchase program from time to time.
Our capitalization wasis as follows:  
(In thousands)December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
Convertible Notes due 2017$83,256
 $172,497
Convertible Notes due 2021100,000
 
Revolving credit facility
 
2021 Convertible Notes$100,000
 $100,000
ABL Facility
 
65,000
 76,300
Other debt380
 7,392
7,164
 3,199
Unamortized discount and debt issuance costs(27,368) (1,296)(12,291) (17,752)
Total debt156,268
 178,593
$159,873
 $161,747
      
Stockholder's equity500,543
 520,259
Stockholder’s equity548,645
 569,681
Total capitalization$656,811
 $698,852
$708,518
 $731,428
      
Total debt to capitalization23.8% 25.6%22.6% 22.1%
2021 Convertible Notes due 2017. In September 2010, we issued $172.5 million of unsecured convertible senior notes that mature on October 1, 2017, of which, $83.3 million aggregate principal amount was outstanding at December 31, 2016. The notes bear interest at a rate of 4.0% per year, payable semiannually in arrears on April 1 and October 1 of each year. Holders may convert the notes at their option at any time prior to the close of business on the business day immediately preceding the October 1, 2017 maturity date. The conversion rate is initially 90.8893 shares of our common stock per $1,000 principal amount of notes (equivalent to an initial conversion price of $11.00 per share of common stock), subject to adjustment in certain circumstances. Upon conversion, the notes will be settled in shares of our common stock. We may not redeem the notes prior to their maturity date. In 2016, we repurchased $89.3 million aggregate principal amount of our Convertible Notes due 2017 for $87.3 million and recognized a net gain of $1.6 million reflecting the difference in the amount paid and the net carrying value of the extinguished debt, including debt issuance costs. We intend to use available cash on-hand, cash generated by operations, including U.S. income tax refunds, and estimated availability under our ABL Facility to repay the remaining Convertible Notes due 2017.
Convertible Notes due 2021.Notes. In December 2016, we issued $100.0 million of unsecured convertible senior notes (“2021 Convertible Notes”) that mature on December 1, 2021, unless earlier converted by the holders pursuant to the terms of the notes. The notes bear interest at a rate of 4.0% per year, payable semiannually in arrears on June 1 and December 1 of each year.
Holders may convert the notes at their option at any time prior to the close of business on the business day immediately preceding June 1, 2021, only under the following circumstances:
during any calendar quarter commencing after the calendar quarter ending on March 31, 2017 (and only during such calendar quarter), if the last reported sale price of our common stock for at least 20 trading days (regardless of whether consecutive) during a period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the immediately preceding calendar quarter is greater than or equal to 130% of the conversion price of the notes in effect on each applicable trading day;
during the five business day period after any five consecutive trading day period in which the trading price per $1,000 principal amount of notes for each trading day was less than 98% of the last reported sale price of our common stock on such date multiplied by the conversion rate on each such trading day; or


upon the occurrence of specified corporate events, as described in the indenture governing the notes, such as a consolidation, merger, or share exchange.
On or after June 1, 2021 until the close of business on the business day immediately preceding the maturity date, holders may convert their notes at any time, regardless of whether any of the foregoing conditions have been satisfied. As of February 24, 2017,18, 2020, the notes were not convertible.
The notes are convertible into, at our election, cash, shares of common stock, or a combination of both, subject to satisfaction of specified conditions and during specified periods, as described above. If converted, we currently intend to pay cash for the principal amount of the notes converted. The conversion rate is initially 107.1381 shares of our common stock per $1,000 principal amount of notes (equivalent to an initial conversion price of $9.33 per share of common stock), subject to adjustment in certain circumstances. We may not redeem the notes prior to their maturity date.


In accordance with accounting guidance for convertible debt with a cash conversion option, we separately accounted for the debt and equity components of the notes in a manner that reflected our estimated nonconvertible debt borrowing rate. We estimated the fair value of the debt component of the notes to be $75.2 million at the issuance date, assuming a 10.5% non-convertible borrowing rate. The carrying amount of the equity component was determined to be approximately $24.8 million by deducting the fair value of the debt component from the principal amount of the notes, and was recorded as an increase to additional paid-in capital, net of the related deferred tax liability of $8.7 million. The excess of the principal amount of the debt component over its carrying amount (the “debt discount”) is being amortized as interest expense over the term of the notes using the effective interest method. See “Note 6 – Financing Arrangements” for further discussion of the accounting treatment for the Convertible Notes due 2021.
Revolving Credit Facility. In March 2015, we entered into a Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) which provided for a $200.0 million revolving loan facility available for borrowings and letters of credit through March 2020. In December 2015, the Credit Agreement was amended, decreasing the revolving credit facility to $150.0 million and subsequently, we terminated the Credit Agreement in May 2016, replacing it with an asset-based revolving loan facility as discussed further below. As of the date of termination, we had no outstanding borrowings under the Credit Agreement. In the second quarter of 2016, we recognized a non-cash charge of $1.1 million in interest expense for the write-off of debt issuance costs in connection with the termination.
Asset-Based Loan Facility. In May 2016, we entered into an asset-based revolving credit agreement which replaced the terminated Credit Agreement.our previous credit agreement. In FebruaryOctober 2017, we entered into an Amended and Restated Credit Agreement and in March 2019, we entered into a First Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (as amended, the ABL Facility primarily to incorporate“ABL Facility”). The March 2019 amendment increased the Convertible Notes due 2021 that were issued in December 2016 as well as other administrative matters.amount available for borrowings, reduced applicable borrowing rates, and extended the term. The ABL Facility provides financing of up to $90.0$200.0 million available for borrowings (inclusive of letters of credit), and subject to certain conditions, can be increased up to a maximum capacity of $150.0$275.0 million, subject to certain conditions. As of December 31, 2019, our total availability under the ABL Facility was $156.8 million, of which $65.0 million was drawn, resulting in remaining availability of $91.8 million.
The ABL Facility terminates onin March 6, 2020;2024; however, the ABL Facility has a springing maturity date that will accelerate the maturity of the credit facilityABL Facility to June 30, 2017September 1, 2021 if, prior to such date, the 2021 Convertible Notes due 2017 have not either been repurchased, redeemed, convertedrefinanced, exchanged or otherwise satisfied in full or we have not providedescrowed an amount of funds, that together with the amount that we establish as a reserve against our borrowing capacity, is sufficient funds to repayfor the future settlement of the 2021 Convertible Notes due 2017 in full onat their maturity date. For this purpose, funds may be provided in cash to an escrow agent or a combination of cash to an escrow agent and the assignment of a portion of availability under the ABL Facility.maturity. The ABL Facility requires compliance with a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio and minimum unused availability of $25.0 million to utilize borrowings or assignment of availability under the ABL Facility towards funding the repayment of the 20172021 Convertible Notes.
Borrowing availability under the ABL Facility is calculated based on eligible accounts receivable, inventory, and, subject to satisfaction of certain financial covenants as described below, composite mats included in the rental fleet, net of reserves and limits on such assets included in the borrowing base calculation. To the extent pledged by us, the borrowing base calculation shall also includeincludes the amount of eligible pledged cash. The lender may establish such reserves, in part based on appraisals of the asset base, and other limits at its discretion which could reduce the amounts otherwise available under the ABL Facility. Availability associated with eligible rental mats will also be subject to maintaining a minimum consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio and a minimum level of operating income for the Mats and Integrated Services segment. As of December 31, 2016, we had no borrowings outstanding under the ABL Facility with a total borrowing base availability of $60.5 million. Including the addition of eligible composite mats included in the rental fleet beginning in 2017, total borrowing base availability as of January 1, 2017 was $76.3 million.
Under the terms of the ABL Facility, we may elect to borrow at a variable interest rate plus an applicable margin based on either, (1) LIBOR subject to a floor of zero or (2) a base rate equal to the highest of: (a) the federal funds rate plus 50 basis points, (b) the prime rate of Bank of America, N.A. orand (c) LIBOR, subject to a floor of zero, plus 100 basis points.points, plus, in each case, an applicable margin per annum. The applicable margin ranges from 225150 to 350200 basis points for LIBOR borrowings, and 12550 to 250100 basis points with respect tofor base rate borrowings, based on our consolidated EBITDA, ratio of debt to consolidated EBITDA, andthe consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio each as defined in the ABL Facility. As of December 31, 2016,2019, the applicable margin for borrowings under our ABL Facility is 350was 150 basis points with respect to LIBOR borrowings and 25050 basis points with respect to base rate borrowings. The weighted average interest rate for the ABL Facility was 3.2% at December 31, 2019. In addition, we are required to pay a commitment fee on the unused portion of the ABL Facility ranging from 37.525 to 62.537.5 basis points, based on the ratiolevel of debt to consolidated EBITDA,outstanding borrowings, as defined in the ABL Facility. TheAs of December 31, 2019, the applicable commitment fee as of December 31, 2016 was 62.537.5 basis points.
The ABL Facility is a senior secured obligation, secured by first liens on substantially all of our U.S. tangible and intangible assets, and a portion of the capital stock of our non-U.S. subsidiaries has also been pledged as collateral. The ABL Facility contains customary operating covenants and certain restrictions including, among other things, the incurrence of additional debt, liens, dividends, asset sales, investments, mergers, acquisitions, affiliate transactions, stock repurchases and other restricted payments. The ABL Facility also requires compliance with a fixed charge coverage ratio if availability under the ABL Facility falls below $25.0$22.5 million. In addition, the ABL Facility contains customary events of default, including, without limitation, a failure to make payments under the facility, acceleration of more than $25.0 million of other indebtedness, certain bankruptcy events, and certain change of control events.


Other Debt. Our foreign subsidiaries in Italy, India, the United Kingdom, and IndiaCanada maintain local credit arrangements consisting primarily of lines of credit or overdraft facilities which are renewed on an annual basis. In December 2016, we terminated our revolving line of credit in Brazil and repaid the outstanding balance. We utilize local financing arrangements in our foreign operations in order to provide short-term local liquidity needs. Advances under these short-term credit arrangements are typically based on a percentage of the subsidiary’s accounts receivable or firm contracts with certain customers. TotalWe had $4.8 million and $1.1 million, respectively, outstanding balances under these arrangements and other domestic financing arrangements were $0.4 million and $7.4 million at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
At December 31, 2016, we had letters of credit issued and outstanding which totaled $5.9 million that are collateralized by $6.5 million in restricted cash. Additionally, our foreign operations had $11.3 million outstanding in letters of credit and other guarantees, primarily issued under the line of credit in Italy as well as certain letters of credit that are collateralized by $0.9 million in restricted cash. At December 31, 20162019 and December 31, 2015, total restricted cash of $7.4 million and $17.5 million, respectively, was included in other current assets in the accompanying balance sheet.

2018.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
In conjunction with our insurance programs,

We do not have any special purpose entities. At December 31, 2019, we had established$52.5 million in outstanding letters of credit, in favor of certain insurance companies in the amount of $3.0 million and $3.3 million at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. We also had $0.4 million in guarantee obligations in connection with facility closureperformance bonds, and other performance bonds issuedguarantees for which certain of the letters of credit are collateralized by insurance companies outstanding as of December 31, 2016 and 2015.
Other than$8.2 million in restricted cash. We also enter into normal short-term operating leases for office and warehouse space, as well as rolling stock and other pieces of operating equipment, we do not have anyequipment. None of these off-balance sheet financing arrangements either has, or special purpose entities. As such, we are not materially exposedis expected to any financing, liquidity, market or credit risk that could arise if we had engaged in such financing arrangements.have, a material effect on our financial statements.
Contractual Obligations
A summary of our outstanding contractual and other obligations and commitments at December 31, 20162019 is as follows: 
(In thousands)2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Thereafter Total2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Thereafter Total
Convertible Notes due 2017$83,256
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $83,256
Other current debt380
 
 
 
 
 
 380
Convertible Notes due 2021
 
 
 
 100,000
 
 100,000
Interest on Convertible Notes due 2017 and Convertible Notes due 20217,286
 4,000
 4,000
 4,000
 4,000
 
 23,286
Operating leases9,310
 6,128
 4,724
 3,805
 3,342
 9,780
 37,089
Current debt$6,335
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $6,335
2021 Convertible Notes
 100,000
 
 
 
 
 100,000
Interest on 2021 Convertible Notes4,000
 4,000
 
 
 
 
 8,000
ABL Facility
 
 
 
 65,000
 
 65,000
Operating lease liabilities (1)
7,528
 5,932
 4,351
 3,199
 2,760
 17,165
 40,935
Trade accounts payable and accrued liabilities (1)(2)
95,128
 
 
 
 
 
 95,128
116,089
 
 
 
 
 
 116,089
Purchase commitments, not accrued3,000
 
 
 
 
 
 3,000
7,655
 3,443
 
 
 
 
 11,098
Other long-term liabilities (2)(3)

 
 
 
 
 6,196
 6,196

 
 
 
 
 7,841
 7,841
Performance bond obligations384
 
 
 
 
 
 384
13,296
 
 
 
 
 
 13,296
Letter of credit commitments6,407
 8,068
 1,290
 
 82
 1,383
 17,230
17,043
 2,634
 1,383
 90
 17,109
 965
 39,224
Total contractual obligations$205,151
 $18,196
 $10,014
 $7,805
 $107,424
 $17,359
 $365,949
$171,946
 $116,009
 $5,734
 $3,289
 $84,869
 $25,971
 $407,818
(1)Excludes accrued interest onOperating lease liabilities represent the Convertible Notes due 2017 and the Convertible Notes due 2021.undiscounted future lease payments. See Note 8 for additional information.
(2)Excludes accrued interest on the 2021 Convertible Notes and the current portion of operating lease liabilities.
(3)Table does not allocate by year expected tax payments and uncertain tax positions due to the inability to make reasonably reliable estimates of the timing of future cash settlements with the respective taxing authorities. ForSee Note 9 for additional discussion on uncertain tax positions, see “Note 8 - Income Taxes” in our Consolidated Financial Statements.positions.
We anticipate that the obligations and commitments listed above that are due in less than one year will be paid from available cash on-hand, cash generated by operations, including U.S. income tax refunds, and estimated availability under our ABL Facility, subject to covenant compliance and certain restrictions as further discussed further above. The specific timing of settlement for certain long-term obligations cannot be reasonably estimated.





Critical Accounting Policies
Critical Accounting Estimates
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted withinin the United States (“U.S. GAAP”), which requires usmanagement to make assumptions, estimates and judgmentsassumptions that affect the reported amounts and disclosures reported.disclosures. Significant estimates used in preparing our consolidated financial statements include the following: allowances for product returns, allowances for doubtful accounts, reserves for self-insured retentions under insurance programs, estimated performance and values associated with employee incentive programs, fair values used for goodwill impairment testing, undiscounted future cash flows used for impairment testingimpairments of long-lived assets, including goodwill and other intangibles, and valuation allowances for deferred tax assets. See “Note 1- Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in our Consolidated Financial StatementsNote 1 for a discussion of the accounting policies governingfor each of these matters. Our estimates are based on historical experience and on our future expectations that are believedwe believe to be reasonable. The combination of these factors forms the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from our current estimates and those differences may be material.
We believe the critical accounting policies described below affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in preparing our consolidated financial statements.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Reserves for uncollectible accounts receivable are determined on a specific identification basis when we believe that the required payment of specific amounts owed to us is not probable. The majority of our revenues are from mid-sized and international oil companies as well as government-owned or government-controlled oil companies, and we have receivables in several foreign jurisdictions. Changes in the financial condition of our customers or political changes in foreign jurisdictions could cause our customers to be unable to repay these receivables, resulting in additional allowances. For 2016, 2015, and 2014, provisions for uncollectible accounts receivable related to continuing operations were $2.4 million, $1.9 million and $1.2 million, respectively.
Allowance for Product Returns
We maintain reserves for estimated customer returns of unused products in our Fluids Systems segment. The reserves are established based upon historical customer return levels and estimated gross profit levels attributable to product sales. Future customer return levels may differ from the historical return rate.
Impairment of Long-lived Assets
Goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets are tested for impairment annually as of November 1, or more frequently, if an indicationindicators of impairment exists. TheWhen there are qualitative indicators of impairment, we use an impairment test which includes a comparison of the carrying value of net assets of our reporting units, including goodwill, with their estimated fair values, which we determineestimate using a combination of a market multiple and discounted cash flow approach.approach (classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy). We also compare the aggregate fair values of our reporting units with our market capitalization. If the carrying value exceeds the estimated fair value, an impairment charge is recorded in the period in which such review is performed. We identify our reporting units based on our analysis of several factors, including our operating segment structure, evaluation of the economic characteristics of our geographic regions within each of our operating segments, and the extent to which our business units share assets and other resources.
In completing our November 1, 2016 evaluation, we determined that each reporting unit’s fair value was in excess of the net carrying value and therefore, no impairment was required.
In 2015, we completed thethis annual evaluation during the fourth quarter of the carrying values of our goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets2019, as of November 1, 2015. As a result of the further decline in commodity prices and drilling activities in the fourth quarter of 2015, includingand the projection of lower commodity prices and drilling activities,continued softness in the U.S. land market, as well as the further decline in the quoted market prices of our common stock, we determined that the carrying value ofit was more likely than not that our drilling fluidsFluids Systems reporting unit exceededhad a fair value below its estimated fairnet carrying value such that goodwill was potentially impaired. As a result, we completed step two of the evaluation to measure the amount of goodwill impairment determining a fulland recognized an impairment of goodwill related$11.4 million to the drilling fluids reporting unit was required. As such, in the fourth quarter of 2015, we recorded a $70.7 million non-cash impairment charge to write-offfully impair the goodwill related to the drilling fluidsthis reporting unit, which is included in impairments and other charges. In completing this annual evaluation as of November 1, 2015, weunit. We also determined that the matsMats and integrated servicesIntegrated Services reporting unit did not have a fair value below its net carrying value and therefore, no impairment was required. In completing our November 1, 2018 evaluation, we determined that no impairment was required. At December 31, 2019, we had $42.3 million of goodwill, all of which relates to the Mats and Integrated Services segment.
There are significant inherent uncertainties and management judgment in estimating the fair value of a reporting unit. Significant assumptions inherent in the evaluation include the estimated growth rates for future revenues and the discount rate. Our assumptions were based on historical data supplemented by current and anticipated market conditions. While we believe we have made reasonable estimates and assumptions to estimate the fair value of our reporting units, it is possible that a material change could occur. If actual results are not consistent with our current estimates and assumptions, or if changes in macroeconomic conditions outside the control of management change such that it results in a significant negative impact on our estimated fair values, the fair value of a reporting unit may decrease below its net carrying value, which could result in a material impairment of our goodwill.


We review property, plant and equipment, finite-lived intangible assets and certain other assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. In 2016, we recognized $6.9 millionthe fourth quarter of non-cash impairments in the Asia Pacific region resulting from the continuing unfavorable industry market conditions and the deteriorating outlook for the region and a $0.5 million charge in the Latin America region to write-down property, plant and equipment associated with the wind-down of our operations in Uruguay. In 2015,2019, we recognized a $2.6$0.5 million non-cash impairment charge for assets, following our decision to exit a drilling fluids facility.
certain operations in the U.S. land market as well as Brazil. We assess recoverability based on expected undiscounted future net cash flows. In estimating expected cash flows, we use a probability-weighted approach. Should the review indicate that the carrying value is not fully recoverable, the amount of impairment loss is determined by comparing the carrying value to the estimated fair value. Estimating future net cash flows requires us to make judgments regarding long-term forecasts of future revenues and costs related to the assets subject to review. These forecasts are uncertain in that they require assumptions about demand for our products and services, future market conditions, and technological developments. If changes in these assumptions occur, our expectations regarding future net cash flows may change such thatand a material impairment could result.
InsuranceIncome Taxes
We maintain reservesThe Tax Act was enacted in December 2017, resulting in broad and complex changes to U.S. income tax law. The Tax Act included a one-time transition tax in 2017 on accumulated foreign subsidiary earnings not previously subject to U.S. income tax, reduced the U.S. corporate statutory tax rate from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018, generally eliminated U.S. federal income tax on dividends from foreign subsidiaries, created new tax on certain foreign-sourced earnings, made other changes to


limit certain deductions and changed rules on how certain tax credits and net operating loss carryforwards can be utilized. Due to the timing of the enactment and the complexity involved in applying the provisions of the Tax Act, we made reasonable estimates of the effects and recorded provisional amounts in our 2017 financial statements, and such estimates were finalized during 2018. The net tax benefit recognized in 2017 related to the Tax Act was $3.4 million. As we completed our analysis of the Tax Act in 2018 for estimated future payments associated withpurposes of finalizing our self-insured employee healthcare programs,2017 U.S. federal income tax return, including assessment of additional guidance provided by regulatory bodies, we revised the cumulative net tax benefit related to the Tax Act to $5.0 million by recognizing an additional $1.6 million net tax benefit in 2018.
Although the U.S. corporate statutory tax rate was reduced from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018, our provision for income taxes beginning in 2018 also includes the new tax on certain foreign-sourced earnings as well as any additional foreign withholding taxes related to future repatriation of current year earnings from our non-U.S. subsidiaries. Due to the self-insured retention exposures underrelative contribution of our general liability, auto liabilitydomestic and workers compensation insurance policies.foreign earnings, these taxes on certain foreign-sourced earnings effectively serve to increase our effective tax rate. Our reserves are determined basedeffective tax rate in future periods will depend in large part on historical experience under these programs, including estimated developmentthe relative contribution of known claimsour domestic and estimated incurred-but-not-reported claims. Required reserves could change significantly based upon changes in insurance coverage, loss experience or inflationary impacts. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, total insurance reserves were $2.7 million and $3.4 million, respectively.
Income Taxesforeign earnings.
We had total deferred tax assets of $51.2$40.7 million and $40.3$42.2 million at December 31, 20162019 and 2015,2018, respectively. A valuation allowance must be established to offset a deferred tax asset if, based on available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. We have considered future taxable income and tax planning strategies in assessing the need for our valuation allowance. At December 31, 2016,2019, a total valuation allowance of $21.8$24.0 million was recorded, which includes a valuation allowance on $17.4$12.8 million of net operating loss carryforwards for certain U.S. state and foreign jurisdictions, including Brazil and Australia.Australia, as well as a valuation allowance of $2.9 million for certain tax credits recognized related to the accounting for the impact of the Tax Act. Changes in the expected future generation of qualifying taxable income within these jurisdictions or in the realizability of other tax assets may result in an adjustment to the valuation allowance, which would be charged or credited to income in the period this determination was made. In 2016,2019, we recognized an increase in the valuation allowanceincome tax expense for deferred tax assets, primarily related to our Australian subsidiary and certain U.S. state net operating losses, whichloss carryforwards that are notno longer expected to be realized.realized prior to their expiration. In addition,2018, we decreasedrecognized a decrease in the valuation allowance in 2016for certain deferred tax assets related to Brazil as we were ableour U.K. subsidiary that are now expected to utilize certain net operating loss carryforwards related to income in 2016 from the forgiveness of certain inter-company balances due from our Brazilian subsidiary.be realized.
We file income tax returns in the United States and several non-U.S. jurisdictions and are subject to examination in the various jurisdictions in which we file. We are no longer subject to income tax examinations for U.S. federal and substantially all state jurisdictions for years prior to 2012 and for substantially all foreign jurisdictions for years prior to 2008. In 2017, we received a Revenue Agent Report from the IRS disallowing a deduction claimed on our 2015 tax return associated with the forgiveness of certain inter-company balances due from our Brazilian subsidiary and assessing tax due of approximately $3.9 million. In 2019, we finalized the matter related to our 2015 U.S. tax return with no additional tax due.
Following an audit in 2015, the treasury authority in Mexico issued a tax assessment (inclusive of interest and penalties) in the amount of 60 million pesos (approximately $3.3 million) to our Mexico subsidiary, primarily in connection with the export of mats from Mexico in 2010. The mats that are the subject of this assessment were owned by a U.S. subsidiary and leased to our Mexico subsidiary for matting projects in the Mexican market. In 2010, we made the decision to move these mats out of Mexico to markets with higher demand. The Mexican treasury authority determined the export of the mats was the equivalent of a sale and assessed taxes on the gross declared value of the exported mats to our Mexico subsidiary. We retained outside legal counsel and filed administrative appeals with the treasury authority, but we were notified in April 2018 that the last administrative appeal had been rejected. In response, we filed an appeal in the Mexican Federal Tax Court in the second quarter of 2018, which required that we post a bond in the amount of the assessed taxes (plus additional interest). In the fourth quarter of 2018, the Mexican Federal Tax Court issued a favorable judgment nullifying in full the tax assessment which was subsequently appealed by the treasury authority in Mexico. Following a judgment by the Mexican Court of Appeals, in the third quarter of 2019 the Mexican Federal Tax Court confirmed the full nullification of the tax assessment based on a due process violation and recognized the treasury authority's right to cure the due process violation by starting a new tax audit. The treasury authority in Mexico is appealing the latest judgment from the Mexican Federal Tax Court. Although the tax appeals process has not concluded, we believe our tax position is properly reported in accordance with applicable tax laws and regulations in Mexico and intend to vigorously defend our position through the tax appeals process.
We are currently under examination by the United States federal tax authorities for tax years 2014 and 2015 and by the State of Texas for tax years 2012 through 2015. In addition, we arealso under examination by various tax authorities in other countries.countries, and certain foreign jurisdictions have challenged the amounts of taxes due for certain tax periods. These audits are in various stages of completion. We fully cooperate with all audits, but defend existing positions vigorously. These audits are in various stages of completion and certain foreign jurisdictions have challenged the amount of taxes due for certain tax periods. We evaluate the potential exposure associated with various filing positions and record a liability for uncertain tax contingenciespositions as circumstances warrant. Although we believe all tax positions are reasonable and properly reported in accordance with applicable tax laws and regulations in effect during the periods involved, the final determination of tax audits and any related litigation could be materially different than that which is reflected in historical income tax provisions and tax contingency accruals.
New accounting pronouncements
In May 2014, the FASB amended the existing accounting standards for revenue recognition. The amendments are based on the principle that revenue should be recognized to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The new guidance is effective for us in the first quarter of 2018. The amendments may be applied retrospectively to each prior period presented or retrospectively with the cumulative effect recognized as of the date of initial application. While we have not fully completed our evaluation of the impacts of these amendments, we do not currently anticipate that the adoption will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements. We currently anticipate adopting the new guidance retrospectively with the cumulative effect recognized as of the date of initial application in the first quarter of 2018.



In July 2015, the FASB issued updated guidance that simplifies the subsequent measurementNew Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 1 in Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” for a discussion of inventory. It replaces the current lower of cost or market test with the lower of cost or net realizable value test. Net realizable value is defined as the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. We will adopt the new guidance prospectively in the first quarter of 2017 and do not expect the adoption to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In February 2016, the FASB issued updated guidance regarding accounting for leases. The new accounting standard provides principles for the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of leases and requires lessees to recognize both assets and liabilities arising from financing and operating leases. The classification as either a financing or operating lease will determine whether lease expense is recognized based on an effective interest method basis or on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease, respectively. The new guidance is effective for us in the first quarter of 2019 with early adoption permitted. Based on our current lease portfolio, we anticipate the new guidance will require us to reflect additional assets and liabilities in our consolidated balance sheet, however, we have not yet completed an estimation of such amount and we are still evaluating the overall impact of the new guidance on our consolidated financial statements.pronouncements.
In March 2016, the FASB issued updated guidance that simplifies several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the requirement to recognize excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies through earnings as a component of income tax expense. Under current U.S. GAAP, these differences are generally recorded in additional paid in capital and thus have no impact on net income. The change in treatment of excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies also impacts the computation of diluted earnings per share and the associated cash flows will now be classified as operating activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows. In addition, entities will be permitted to make an accounting policy election related to forfeitures which impacts the timing of recognition for share-based payment awards. Forfeitures can be estimated, as required under current U.S. GAAP, or recognized when they occur. We will adopt the new guidance in the first quarter of 2017 with the most significant impact related to income tax consequences. Upon adoption, any excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies on share-based payment transactions will be recognized as a component of income tax expense as discrete items in the reporting period in which they occur. In addition, we will elect to continue estimating forfeitures in determining share-based compensation expense.
In August 2016, the FASB issued updated guidance that clarifies how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. This update provides guidance on eight specific cash flow issues. This guidance is effective for us in the first quarter of 2018 and should be applied using the retrospective transition method to each period presented. Early adoption is permitted but all changes must be adopted in the same period. We do not expect the adoption of this new guidance to have a material impact on the presentation of our consolidated statements of cash flows.
In October 2016, the FASB amended the guidance related to the recognition of current and deferred income taxes for intra-entity asset transfers. Under current U.S. GAAP, recognition of income taxes on intra-entity asset transfers is prohibited until the asset has been sold to an outside party. This update requires that entities recognize the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory when the transfer occurs. This update does not change U.S. GAAP for the pre-tax effects of an intra-entity asset transfer or for an intra-entity transfer of inventory. This guidance is effective for us in the first quarter of 2018 and should be applied using a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative-effect adjustment directly to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption. We are currently evaluating the impact of the new guidance on our consolidated financial statements.
In November 2016, the FASB issued updated guidance that requires that the statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents. Therefore, amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. This guidance is effective for us in the first quarter of 2018 with early adoption permitted and should be applied using a retrospective transition method to each period presented. We are currently evaluating the impact of the new guidance on our consolidated financial statements.
In January 2017, the FASB amended the guidance related to the accounting for goodwill impairments by eliminating step two from the goodwill impairment test. Under the new guidance, if the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss shall be recognized in an amount equal to that excess, limited to the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. This guidance is effective for us for goodwill impairment tests beginning after December 15, 2019. This guidance should be applied prospectively and early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of the new guidance on our consolidated financial statements.




ITEM 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures aboutAbout Market Risk
We are exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates and changes in foreign currency exchange rates. A discussion of our primary market risk exposure in financial instruments is presented below.
Interest Rate Risk
At December 31, 2016,2019, we had total debtprincipal amounts outstanding under financing arrangements of $183.6$172.2 million, including $83.3 million of borrowings under our Convertible Notes due 2017 and $100.0 million of borrowings under our 2021 Convertible Notes due 2021, both of which bear interest at a fixed rate of 4%. We did not have any variable rate debt outstanding at December 31, 2016.4.0% and $65.0 million of borrowings under our ABL Facility. Borrowings under our ABL Facility are subject to a variable interest rate as determined by the credit agreement. At December 31, 2016, no borrowings were outstanding under the ABL Facility. The weighted average interest rate at December 31, 2019 for the ABL Facility was 3.2%. Based on the balance of variable rate debt at December 31, 2019, a 100 basis-point increase in short-term interest rates would have increased annual pre-tax interest expense by $0.7 million.
Foreign Currency Risk
Our principal foreign operations are conducted in certain areas of EMEA, Latin America,Canada, Asia Pacific, and Canada.Latin America. We have foreign currency exchange risks associated with these operations, which are conducted principally in the foreign currency of the jurisdictions in which we operate including European euros, Algerian dinar, Romanian new leu, Canadian dollars, British pounds, Australian dollars, British pounds and Brazilian reais. Historically, we have not used off-balance sheet financial hedging instruments to manage foreign currency risks when we enter into a transaction denominated in a currency other than our local currencies.
Unremitted foreign earnings permanently reinvested abroad upon which deferred income taxes have not been provided aggregated approximately $161.7 million and $142.8 million at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. It is not practicable to determine the amount of federal income taxes, if any, that might become due if such earnings are repatriated. We have the ability and intent to leave these foreign earnings permanently reinvested abroad. 




ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
To the stockholders and the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Newpark Resources, Inc.
The Woodlands, Texas

Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Newpark Resources, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 20162019 and 2015, and2018, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), stockholders’ equity, and cash flows, for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016. 2019, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 21, 2020, expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Change in Accounting Principle
As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for leases in 2019 due to the adoption of Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-02, Leases, under the modified retrospective transition method.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits.

We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the US federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includesmisstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence supportingregarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An auditOur audits also includes assessingincluded evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statement presentation.statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matter
InThe critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) related to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion such consolidatedon the financial statements, present fairly, in all material respects,taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
Goodwill - Fluids Systems Reporting Unit - Refer to Notes 1 and 5 to the financial positionstatements
Critical Audit Matter Description
The Company’s evaluation of Newpark Resources, Inc.goodwill associated with the Fluids Systems reporting unit for impairment includes a comparison of the carrying value of the reporting unit, including goodwill, with the estimated fair value. The Company uses a combination of a market multiple and subsidiariesa discounted cash flow approach. The Company’s discounted cash flow model requires management to make significant estimates and assumptions related to forecasts of future cash flows, including revenue, and the selection of the discount and growth rates for the reporting unit. Changes in these assumptions could have a significant impact on either the fair value, the amount of any goodwill impairment charge, or both. The goodwill balance was $11.4 million within the Fluids Systems reporting unit as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for eachannual goodwill measurement date. The carrying value of the three years inFluids Systems reporting unit exceeded its fair value as of the periodmeasurement date and, therefore, a full impairment was recognized during the year ended December 31, 2016, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted2019.
Given the significant judgements made by management to estimate the fair value of the Fluids Systems reporting unit, performing audit procedures to evaluate the reasonableness of management’s estimates and assumptions related to the discounted cash flow


model including forecasts of revenue, and the selection of the market multiples, discount and growth rates for the Fluids Systems reporting unit required a high degree of auditor judgment and an increased extent of effort, including the need to involve fair value specialists.
How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the United StatesAudit
Our audit procedures related to the forecasts of America.

We have also audited, in accordance withfuture revenue and the standardsselection of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States),discount and revenue growth rates used by management to estimate the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on the criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizationsfair value of the Treadway CommissionFluids Systems reporting unit included the following, among others:
We tested the effectiveness of controls over management’s goodwill impairment evaluation, including controls related to forecasts of revenue over the discrete period and management’s selection of the market multiples, discount and revenue growth rates.
We evaluated management’s ability to accurately forecast by comparing actual results to management’s historical forecasts.
We evaluated the reasonableness of management’s forecasts of future revenue by comparing the forecasts to (1) historical results, (2) internal communications to management and the board of directors, and (3) industry reports.
We evaluated the impact of changes on management’s combination of market multiple and discounted cash flow approach.
With the assistance of our report dated February 24, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion onfair value specialists, we evaluated the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.reasonableness of the reporting unit’s market multiples as well as the overall long-term growth rate and discount rate by:
Developing a range of independent estimates and comparing the rates and multiples utilized by management and
Comparing management’s overall long-term growth rates to industry reports and peer companies.



/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
 
Houston, Texas
February 24, 201721, 2020 

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2008.





Newpark Resources, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
December 31,
(In thousands, except share data)2016 20152019 2018
ASSETS      
Cash and cash equivalents$87,878
 $107,138
$48,672
 $56,118
Receivables, net214,307
 206,364
216,714
 254,394
Inventories143,612
 163,657
196,897
 196,896
Prepaid expenses and other current assets17,143
 29,219
16,526
 15,904
Total current assets462,940
 506,378
478,809
 523,312
      
Property, plant and equipment, net303,654
 307,632
310,409
 316,293
Operating lease assets32,009
 
Goodwill19,995
 19,009
42,332
 43,832
Other intangible assets, net6,067
 11,051
29,677
 25,160
Deferred tax assets1,747
 1,821
3,600
 4,516
Other assets3,780
 3,002
3,243
 2,741
Total assets$798,183
 $848,893
$900,079
 $915,854
      
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY      
Current debt$83,368
 $7,382
$6,335
 $2,522
Accounts payable65,281
 72,211
79,777
 90,607
Accrued liabilities31,152
 45,835
42,750
 48,797
Total current liabilities179,801
 125,428
128,862
 141,926
      
Long-term debt, less current portion72,900
 171,211
153,538
 159,225
Noncurrent operating lease liabilities26,946
 
Deferred tax liabilities38,743
 26,368
34,247
 37,486
Other noncurrent liabilities6,196
 5,627
7,841
 7,536
Total liabilities297,640
 328,634
351,434
 346,173
      
Commitments and contingencies (Note 15)

 

Commitments and contingencies (Note 16)


 


      
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 200,000,000 shares authorized and 99,843,094 and 99,377,391 shares issued, respectively998
 994
Common stock, $0.01 par value (200,000,000 shares authorized and 106,696,719 and 106,362,991 shares issued, respectively)1,067
 1,064
Paid-in capital558,966
 533,746
620,626
 617,276
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(63,208) (58,276)(67,947) (67,673)
Retained earnings129,873
 171,788
134,119
 148,802
Treasury stock, at cost; 15,162,050 and 15,302,345 shares, respectively(126,086) (127,993)
Treasury stock, at cost (16,958,418 and 15,530,952 shares, respectively)(139,220) (129,788)
Total stockholders’ equity500,543
 520,259
548,645
 569,681
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity$798,183
 $848,893
$900,079
 $915,854
 
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements




Newpark Resources, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Years Ended December 31,
(In thousands, except per share data)2016 2015 20142019 2018 2017
Revenues$471,496
 $676,865
 $1,118,416
     
Product sales revenues$654,006
 $743,342
 $628,401
Rental and service revenues166,113
 203,206
 119,362
Total revenues820,119
 946,548
 747,763
Cost of revenues437,836
 599,013
 876,999
     
Cost of product sales revenues568,388
 633,847
 539,243
Cost of rental and service revenues116,350
 133,128
 68,656
Total cost of revenues684,738
 766,975
 607,899
Selling, general and administrative expenses88,473
 101,032
 112,648
113,394
 115,127
 108,838
Other operating income, net(4,345) (2,426) (1,827)
Impairments and other charges6,745
 78,345
 
Operating income (loss)(57,213) (99,099) 130,596
Other operating (income) loss, net170
 888
 (410)
Goodwill impairment11,422
 
 
Operating income10,395
 63,558
 31,436
          
Foreign currency exchange (gain) loss(710) 4,016
 108
(816) 1,416
 2,051
Interest expense, net9,866
 9,111
 10,431
14,369
 14,864
 13,273
Gain on extinguishment of debt(1,615) 
 
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes(64,754) (112,226) 120,057
(3,158) 47,278
 16,112
          
Provision (benefit) for income taxes(24,042) (21,398) 41,048
Provision for income taxes9,788
 14,997
 4,893
Income (loss) from continuing operations(40,712) (90,828) 79,009
(12,946) 32,281
 11,219
          
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
 
 1,152
Gain from disposal of discontinued operations, net of tax
 
 22,117
Loss from disposal of discontinued operations, net of tax
 
 (17,367)
Net income (loss)$(40,712) $(90,828) $102,278
$(12,946) $32,281
 $(6,148)
     
          
Income (loss) per common share - basic:          
Income (loss) from continuing operations$(0.49) $(1.10) $0.95
$(0.14) $0.36
 $0.13
Income from discontinued operations
 
 0.28
Loss from discontinued operations
 
 (0.20)
Net income (loss)$(0.49) $(1.10) $1.23
$(0.14) $0.36
 $(0.07)
          
Income (loss) per common share - diluted:          
Income (loss) from continuing operations$(0.49) $(1.10) $0.84
$(0.14) $0.35
 $0.13
Income from discontinued operations
 
 0.23
Loss from discontinued operations
 
 (0.20)
Net income (loss)$(0.49) $(1.10) $1.07
$(0.14) $0.35
 $(0.07)
  
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements




Newpark Resources, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Years Ended December 31,
(In thousands)2016 2015 20142019 2018 2017
          
Net income (loss)$(40,712) $(90,828) $102,278
$(12,946) $32,281
 $(6,148)
     
Foreign currency translation adjustments(4,932) (26,284) (22,508)
     
Foreign currency translation adjustments (net of tax benefit of $373, $413, $0)(274) (14,454) 9,989
Comprehensive income (loss)$(45,644) $(117,112) $79,770
$(13,220) $17,827
 $3,841
 
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements




Newpark Resources, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity
(In thousands)Common
Stock
 Paid-In
Capital
 Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss
 Retained
Earnings
 Treasury
Stock
 TotalCommon
Stock
 Paid-In
Capital
 Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss
 Retained
Earnings
 Treasury
Stock
 Total
Balance at January 1, 2014$980
 $504,675
 $(9,484) $160,338
 $(75,455) $581,054
Balance at January 1, 2017$998
 $558,966
 $(63,208) $129,873
 $(126,086) $500,543
Net loss
 
 
 (6,148) 
 (6,148)
Employee stock options, restricted stock and employee stock purchase plan14
 1,636
 
 (350) (1,485) (185)
Stock-based compensation expense
 10,843
 
 
 
 10,843
Issuance of shares for acquisition34
 32,404
 
 
 
 32,438
Foreign currency translation
 
 9,989
 
 
 9,989
Balance at December 31, 20171,046
 603,849
 (53,219) 123,375
 (127,571) 547,480
Cumulative effect of accounting changes
 
 
 (6,764) 
 (6,764)
Net income
 
 
 102,278
 
 102,278

 
 
 32,281
 
 32,281
Employee stock options, restricted stock and employee stock purchase plan12
 2,970
 
 
 (1,335) 1,647
18
 3,066
 
 (90) (2,217) 777
Stock-based compensation expense
 12,411
 
 
 
 12,411

 10,361
 
 
 
 10,361
Income tax effect, net, of employee stock related activity
 1,172
 
 
 
 1,172
Treasury shares purchased at cost
 
 
 
 (50,596) (50,596)
Foreign currency translation
 
 (22,508) 
 
 (22,508)
Balance at December 31, 2014992
 521,228
 (31,992) 262,616
 (127,386) 625,458
Net loss
 
 
 (90,828) 
 (90,828)
Foreign currency translation, net of tax
 
 (14,454) 
 
 (14,454)
Balance at December 31, 20181,064
 617,276
 (67,673) 148,802
 (129,788) 569,681
Net income
 
 
 (12,946) 
 (12,946)
Employee stock options, restricted stock and employee stock purchase plan2
 (402) 
 
 (607) (1,007)3
 (8,290) 
 (1,737) 9,599
 (425)
Stock-based compensation expense
 14,202
 
 
 
 14,202

 11,640
 
 
 
 11,640
Income tax effect, net, of employee stock related activity
 (412) 
 
 
 (412)
Foreign currency translation
 
 (26,284) 
 
 (26,284)
Other
 (870) 
 
 
 (870)
Balance at December 31, 2015994
 533,746
 (58,276) 171,788
 (127,993) 520,259
Net loss
 
 
 (40,712) 
 (40,712)
Employee stock options, restricted stock and employee stock purchase plan4
 (478) 
 (1,203) 1,907
 230
Stock-based compensation expense
 12,056
 
 
 
 12,056
Income tax effect, net, of employee stock related activity
 (1,558) 
 
 
 (1,558)
Issuance of Convertible Notes due 2021
 15,200
 
 
 
 15,200
Foreign currency translation
 
 (4,932) 
 
 (4,932)
Balance at December 31, 2016$998
 $558,966
 $(63,208) $129,873
 $(126,086) $500,543
Treasury shares purchased at cost
 
 
 
 (19,031) (19,031)
Foreign currency translation, net of tax
 
 (274) 
 
 (274)
Balance at December 31, 2019$1,067
 $620,626
 $(67,947) $134,119
 $(139,220) $548,645
 
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements




Newpark Resources, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Years Ended December 31,
(In thousands)2016 2015 20142019 2018 2017
Cash flows from operating activities:          
Net income (loss)$(40,712) $(90,828) $102,278
$(12,946) $32,281
 $(6,148)
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operations:     
Impairments and other non-cash charges12,523
 75,508
 
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operations:     
Goodwill impairment11,422
 
 
Depreciation and amortization37,955
 43,917
 42,030
47,144
 45,899
 39,757
Stock-based compensation expense12,056
 14,202
 12,304
11,640
 10,361
 10,843
Provision for deferred income taxes3,352
 (503) (2,328)(4,250) 236
 (10,350)
Net provision for doubtful accounts2,416
 1,886
 1,252
1,792
 2,849
 1,481
Gain on sale of a business
 
 (33,974)
Loss on sale of a business
 
 21,983
Gain on sale of assets(2,820) (1,364) (1,369)(10,801) (1,821) (5,478)
Gain on extinguishment of debt(1,615) 
 
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation
 (204) (1,278)
Gain on insurance recovery
 (606) 
Amortization of original issue discount and debt issuance costs6,188
 5,510
 5,345
Change in assets and liabilities:          
(Increase) decrease in receivables(1,699) 122,399
 (53,494)40,182
 (7,388) (73,722)
(Increase) decrease in inventories16,044
 21,309
 (14,136)699
 (30,352) (15,097)
(Increase) decrease in other assets2,639
 1,191
 (546)(1,032) 1,055
 986
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable(5,213) (31,974) 23,606
(8,318) 2,449
 14,153
Increase (decrease) in accrued liabilities and other(23,831) (34,022) 14,828
(9,434) 2,930
 54,628
Net cash provided by operating activities11,095
 121,517
 89,173
72,286
 63,403
 38,381
          
Cash flows from investing activities:          
Capital expenditures(38,440) (69,404) (106,973)(44,806) (45,141) (31,371)
Decrease (increase) in restricted cash10,060
 (17,485) 
Business acquisitions, net of cash acquired(18,692) (249) (44,750)
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment4,540
 2,523
 3,205
13,734
 2,612
 7,747
Proceeds from sale of a business
 
 89,766
Business acquisitions, net of cash acquired(4,420) 
 
Proceeds from insurance property claim
 1,000
 
Refund of proceeds from sale of a business
 (13,974) 
Net cash used in investing activities(28,260) (84,366) (14,002)(49,764) (55,752) (68,374)
          
Cash flows from financing activities:          
Borrowings on lines of credit6,437
 11,036
 62,164
327,983
 347,613
 176,267
Payments on lines of credit(14,269) (12,544) (62,445)(335,613) (352,582) (93,700)
Proceeds from Convertible Notes due 2021100,000
 
 
Purchases of Convertible Notes due 2017(87,271) 
 
Payment on 2017 Convertible Notes
 
 (83,252)
Debt issuance costs(5,403) (2,023) 
(1,214) (149) (955)
Other financing activities357
 (1,673) (467)
Proceeds from employee stock plans725
 553
 3,442
1,314
 3,874
 2,424
Purchases of treasury stock(1,226) (2,283) (53,130)(21,737) (3,870) (3,239)
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation
 204
 1,278
Other financing activities(259) 601
 165
Net cash used in financing activities(650) (6,730) (49,158)(29,526) (4,513) (2,290)
          
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash(1,445) (8,335) (6,801)(399) (4,332) 2,444
          
Net increase (decease) in cash and cash equivalents(19,260) 22,086
 19,212
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year107,138
 85,052
 65,840
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year$87,878
 $107,138
 $85,052
     
Cash paid (received) for:     
Income taxes (net of refunds)$(20,709) $10,866
 $56,568
Interest$8,802
 $8,464
 $9,865
Net decrease in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash(7,403) (1,194) (29,839)
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at beginning of year64,266
 65,460
 95,299
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at end of year$56,863
 $64,266
 $65,460

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 

NEWPARK RESOURCES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 






Note 1 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Organization and Principles of Consolidation. Newpark Resources, Inc. was organized in 1932 as a Nevada corporation. In 1991, we changed our state of incorporation to Delaware. The consolidated financial statements include our company and our wholly-owned subsidiaries (“we”, “our”we,” “our,” or “us”). All intercompany transactions are eliminated in consolidation.
We are a geographically diversified supplier providing products, as well as rentals and services primarily to the oil and natural gas exploration and production (“E&P”) industry. We operate our business through two2 reportable segments: Fluids Systems and Mats and Integrated Services. Our Fluids Systems segment provides customized drilling, completion, and stimulation fluids solutions to E&P customers globally, operating through four geographic regions:primarily in North America and Europe, the Middle East and Africa (“EMEA”), as well as certain countries in Asia Pacific and Latin America, and Asia Pacific.America. Our Mats and Integrated Services segment provides composite mat rentals as well as locationutilized for temporary worksite access, along with related site construction and related site services to customers. In addition, mat rental and services activity is expandingcustomers in othervarious markets including E&P, electrical transmission & distribution, pipeline, solar, petrochemical, and construction industries across the U.S., CanadaNorth America and United Kingdom.Europe. We also sell composite mats to customers outside ofaround the U.S., and to domestic customers outside of the oil and gas exploration market.world.
Use of Estimates and Market Risks. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“USU.S. GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Estimates used in preparing our consolidated financial statements include, but are not limited to the following: allowances for product returns, allowances for doubtful accounts, reserves for self-insured retentionsretention under insurance programs, estimated performance and values associated with employee incentive programs, fair values used for goodwill impairment testing, undiscounted future cash flows used for impairment testingimpairments of long-lived assets, including goodwill and other intangibles, and valuation allowances for deferred tax assets.
Our operating results, particularly for the Fluids Systems segment, depend to a large extent, on oil and natural gas drilling activity levels in the markets we serve and particularly for the Fluids Systems segment, the nature of the drilling operations (including the depth and whether the wells are drilled vertically or horizontally), which governs the revenue potential of each well. Drilling activity levels, in turn, dependsdepend on a variety of factors, including oil and natural gas commodity pricing, inventory levels, product demand, and regulatory restrictions. Oil and natural gas prices and activity are cyclical and volatile. Thisvolatile, and this market volatility has a significant impact on our operating results.
Cash Equivalents. All highly liquid investments with a remaining maturity of three months or less at the date of acquisition are classified as cash equivalents.
RestrictedCash. Cash that is restricted as to withdrawal or usage is recognized as restricted cash and is included in other current assets in the accompanyingconsolidated balance sheet.sheets.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts. Reserves for uncollectible accounts receivable are determined on a specific identification basis when we believe that the required payment of specific amounts owed to us is not probable. The majority of our revenues are from mid-sized and international oil companies as well as government-owned or government-controlled oil companies, and we have receivables in several foreign jurisdictions. Changes in the financial condition of our customers or political changes in foreign jurisdictions could cause our customers to be unable to repay these receivables, resulting in additional allowances.
Allowance for Product Returns.  We maintain reserves for estimated customer returns of unused products in our Fluids Systems segment. The reserves are established based upon historical customer return levels and estimated gross profit levels attributable to product sales.
Inventories. Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (principally average cost) or market.net realizable value. Certain conversion costs associated with the acquisition, production, blending, and storage of inventory in our Fluids Systems segment as well as in the manufacturing operations in the Mats and Integrated Services segment are capitalized as a component of the carrying value of the inventory and expensed as a component of cost of revenues as the products are sold. Reserves for inventory obsolescence are determined based on the fair value of the inventory using factors such as our historical usage of inventory on-hand, future expectations related to our customers’ needs, market conditions, and the development of new products.
Property, Plant and Equipment. Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost. Additions and improvements that extend the useful life of an asset are capitalized. We capitalize interest costs on significant capital projects. Maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. Sales and disposals of property, plant and equipment are removed at carrying cost less accumulated depreciation with any resulting gain or loss reflected in earnings.

NEWPARK RESOURCES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)




Depreciation is provided on property, plant and equipment, including finance lease assets, held under capital leases, primarily utilizing the straight-line method over the following estimated useful service lives or lease term: 
Computer hardware and office equipment 3-5 years
Computer software 3-10 years
Autos &and light trucks 5-7 years
Furniture, fixtures, &and trailers 7-10 years
Composite mats (rental fleet) 10-127-12 years
Machinery and heavy equipment 5-1510-15 years
Owned buildings 20-39 years
Leasehold improvementsLease term, including reasonably assured renewal periods
In 2016, we revised our estimates of the useful lives and residual values of certain of our composite mats included in rental fleet fixed assets within the Mats and Integrated Services segment. We now estimate that certain composite mats which were originally estimated to have a useful life of 7 years with zero residual value will have estimated useful lives ranging from 10 to 12 years with an estimated residual value of 20%. These changes in estimates were recognized prospectively beginning January 1, 2016 resulting in a reduction in depreciation expense for the Mats and Integrated Services segment of approximately $6.1 million, or $0.05 per share, for the year ended December 31, 2016. We expect these changes to have a similar effect on annual results going forward.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.Assets. Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price of acquisitions over the fair value of the net identifiable assets acquired in business combinations. Goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives are not amortized. Intangible assets with finite useful lives are amortized either on a straight-line basis over the asset’s estimated useful life or on a basis that reflects the pattern in which the economic benefits of the asset are realized. Any period costs of maintaining intangible assets are expensed as incurred.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets.Assets. Goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets are tested for impairment annually as of November 1, or more frequently, if an indication of impairment exists. TheAs part of our annual goodwill review we first perform a qualitative assessment based on company performance and future business outlook to determine if indicators of impairment exist. When there are qualitative indicators of impairment, we use an impairment test which includes a comparison of the carrying value of net assets of our reporting units, including goodwill, with their estimated fair values, which we determineestimate using a combination of a market multiple and discounted cash flow approach.approach (classified within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy). We also compare the aggregate fair values of our reporting units with our market capitalization. If the carrying value exceeds the estimated fair value, an impairment charge is recorded in the period in which such review is performed. We identify our reporting units based on our analysis of several factors, including our operating segment structure, evaluation of the economic characteristics of our geographic regions within each of our operating segments, and the extent to which our business units share assets and other resources.
We review property, plant and equipment, finite-lived intangible assets and certain other assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. We assess recoverability based on expected undiscounted future net cash flows. In estimating expected cash flows, we use a probability-weighted approach. Should the review indicate that the carrying value is not fully recoverable;recoverable, the amount of impairment loss is determined by comparing the carrying value to the estimated fair value.
Insurance.Insurance. We maintain reserves for estimated future payments associated with our self-insured employee healthcare programs, as well as the self-insured retention exposures under our general liability, auto liability, and workers compensation insurance policies. Our reserves are determined based on historical experience under these programs, including estimated development of known claims and estimated incurred-but-not-reported claims.
Treasury Stock. Treasury stock is carried at cost, which includes the entire cost of the acquired stock.
Revenue Recognition.Recognition. In 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) amended the guidance for revenue from contracts with customers. See "New Accounting Pronouncements" below for details about the amended guidance and about our adoption. Results for reporting periods beginning after December 31, 2017 are presented under the new guidance, while prior period amounts were not adjusted and continue to be reported in accordance with previous guidance. The Fluids Systems segment recognizes sack and bulk materialadoption of this new guidance primarily affected the timing of revenue recognition for fluid system additive revenuesproducts provided to customers in the delivery of an integrated fluid system in our U.S. drilling fluids business. Under previous guidance, we recognized revenue for these products upon shipment of materials and passage of title. Formulatedtitle, with a reserve for estimated product returns. Under the new guidance, we recognize revenue for these products when they are utilized, which generally occurs at the time of consumption by the customer. The following provides a summary of our significant accounting policies for revenue recognition under the new guidance for periods beginning after December 31, 2017.
Revenue Recognition - Fluids Systems. Revenues for fluid system additive products and engineering services, when provided to customers in the delivery of an integrated fluid system, are recognized as product sales revenues when utilized by the customer. Revenues for formulated liquid systems revenues are recognized as product sales revenues when utilized or lost downhole while drilling. An allowanceRevenues for product returns is maintained, reflecting estimated future customer product returns. Engineeringequipment rentals and relatedother services are provided to customers as an integral component ofthat are ancillary to the fluid system delivery, at agreed upon hourly or daily rates, and revenues are recognized when the services are performed.product
For the Mats and Integrated Services segment, revenues from the sale of mats are recognized when title passes to the customer, which is upon shipment or delivery, depending upon the terms of the underlying sales contract. Revenues for services and rentals provided by this segment are generated from both fixed-price and unit-priced contracts, which are short-term in duration. The activities under these contracts include site preparation, pit design, construction, drilling waste management, and the installation and rental of mat systems for a period of time generally not to exceed 60 days. Revenues from services provided under these

NEWPARK RESOURCES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)




contractsdelivery are recognized in rental and service revenues when the services are performed. For direct sales of fluid system products, revenues are recognized when control passes to the customer, which is generally upon shipment of materials.
Revenue Recognition - Mats and Integrated Services. Revenues for rentals and services are generated from both fixed-price and unit-priced contracts, which are generally short-term in duration. The activities under these contracts include the installation and rental of matting systems for a period of time and services such as access road construction, site planning and preparation, environmental protection, fluids and spill containment, erosion control, and site restoration services. Rental revenues are recognized over the rental term and service revenues are recognized when the specified services are completed.performed. Revenues from any subsequent extensions to the rental agreements are recognized over the extension period. Revenues from the direct sale of mats are recognized when control passes to the customer, which is upon shipment or delivery, depending on the terms of the underlying sales contract.
For both segments, the amount of revenue we recognize for products sold and services performed reflects the consideration to which we expect to be entitled in exchange for such goods or services, which generally reflects the amount we have the right to invoice based on agreed upon unit rates. While billing requirements vary, many of our customer contracts require that billings occur periodically or at the completion of specified activities, even though our performance and right to consideration occurs throughout the contract. As such, we recognize revenue as performance is completed in the amount to which we have the right to invoice. We do not disclose the value of our unsatisfied performance obligations for (i) contracts with an original expected length of one year or less and (ii) contracts for which we recognize revenue for the amount to which we have the right to invoice for products sold and services performed.
Shipping and handling costs are reflected in cost of revenues, and all reimbursements by customers of shipping and handling costs are included in revenues.
Income Taxes.Taxes. We provide for deferred taxes using an asset and liability approach by measuring deferred tax assets and liabilities due to temporary differences existing at year end using currently enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. We reduce deferred tax assets by a valuation allowance when, based on our estimates, it is more likely than not that a portion of those assets will not be realized in a future period. The estimates utilized in recognition of deferred tax assets are subject to revision, either up or down, in future periods based on new facts or circumstances. We present deferred tax assets and liabilities as noncurrent in the balance sheet based on an analysis of each taxpaying component within a jurisdiction. We evaluate uncertain tax positions and record a liability as circumstances warrant.
Share-Based Compensation.Compensation. Share-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award, net of an estimated forfeiture rate. We recognize these costs in the income statement of operations using the straight-line method over the vesting term. Fair value at the grant date is determined using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model for stock options and using the Monte Carlo valuation model for performance-based restricted stock units.
Foreign CurrencyTranslation.Translation. The functional currency for substantially all international subsidiaries is their respective local currency. Financial statements for these international subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars using the exchange rate at each balance sheet date for assets and liabilities and the average exchange rates in effect during the respective period for revenues and expenses. Exchange rate adjustments resulting from translation of foreign currency financial statements of our international subsidiaries are reflected in accumulated other comprehensive loss in stockholders’ equity whereas exchangeuntil such time that the international subsidiary is sold or liquidation is substantially complete, at which time the related accumulated adjustments would be reclassified into income. Exchange rate adjustments resulting from foreign currency denominated transactions are recorded in income. At December 31, 20162019 and 2015,2018, accumulated other comprehensive loss related to foreign subsidiaries reflected in stockholders’ equity amounted to $63.2was $67.9 million and $58.3$67.7 million, respectively. At December 31, 2019, we had $10.3 million of accumulated translation losses related to our subsidiary in Brazil, which we are currently in process of winding down. As such, we will reclassify these accumulated losses and recognize a charge to income at such time when we have substantially liquidated our subsidiary in Brazil.
Fair Value Measurement. Fair value is measured as the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at a measurement date. We apply the following fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value into three levels and bases the categorization within the hierarchy upon the lowest level of input that is available and significant to the fair value measurement:
Level 1: The use of quoted prices in active markets for identical financial instruments.
Level 2: The use of quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets or quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active or other inputs that are observable in the market or can be corroborated by observable market data.
Level 3: The use of significantly unobservable inputs that typically require the use of management'smanagement’s estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing.
Derivative Financial Instruments.  We monitor our exposure to various business risks including interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates and occasionally use derivative financial instruments to manage the impact of certain of these risks. At the inception of a new derivative, we designate the derivative as a cash flow or fair value hedge or we determine the derivative to be undesignated as a hedging instrument based on the underlying facts. We do not enter into derivative instruments for trading purposes.

NEWPARK RESOURCES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


New Accounting Pronouncements
Standard adoptedStandards Adopted in 20162019
Leases.In September 2015,2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued updatedFASB amended the guidance that eliminatesrelated to the requirement to restate prior periods to reflect adjustments made to provisional amounts recognized in a business combination.accounting for leases. The new guidance provides principles for the recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of leases and requires thatlessees to recognize both assets and liabilities arising from finance and operating leases. The classification as either a finance or operating lease will determine whether lease expense is recognized based on an acquirer recognize adjustmentseffective interest method basis or on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease, respectively.
We adopted this new guidance as of January 1, 2019 using the modified retrospective transition method and recorded approximately $28.0 million of operating lease assets and liabilities as of January 1, 2019, with 0 cumulative effect adjustment to provisional amounts that are identified during the measurement period in the reporting period in which the adjustment amounts are determined.retained earnings. The new guidance was effective for us prospectively in the first quarter of 2016; however, the adoption did not have any effecthad no impact on our consolidated financial statements.statements of operations or cash flows. Results for reporting periods beginning after December 31, 2018 are presented under the new guidance, while prior period amounts were not adjusted and continue to be reported in accordance with previous guidance.
As permitted under the transition guidance within the new standard, we elected to carry forward the historical lease identification and classification for existing leases upon adoption. We have also made an accounting policy election to not recognize leases with an initial term of 12 months or less in the consolidated balance sheets. See Note 8 for additional required disclosures.
Standards not yet adoptedAdopted in 2018
Revenue from Contracts with Customers. In May 2014, the FASB amended the existing accounting standardsguidance for revenue recognition.from contracts with customers. The amendments are based on the principle that revenue should be recognized to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. TheWe adopted this new guidance is effective for us inas of January 1, 2018 using the first quartermodified retrospective transition method, and recorded a net reduction of 2018. The amendments may be applied retrospectively$2.3 million to each prior period presented or retrospectively withopening retained earnings to reflect the cumulative effect recognizedof adoption for contracts not completed as of the date of initial application. While we have not fully completed our evaluation of the impacts of these amendments, we do not currently anticipate that the adoption will have a material impact on
NEWPARK RESOURCES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


our consolidated financial statements. We currently anticipate adoptingDecember 31, 2017. Results for reporting periods beginning after December 31, 2017 are presented under the new guidance, retrospectivelywhile prior period amounts were not adjusted and continue to be reported in accordance with previous guidance.
The adoption of this new guidance primarily affected the timing of revenue recognition for fluid system additive products provided to customers in the delivery of an integrated fluid system in our U.S. drilling fluids business. There was no material impact on reported revenues for 2018 as a result of applying the new revenue recognition guidance. The adoption of this guidance also requires additional disclosures for disaggregated revenues, which are included in Note 13. See above for a summary of our significant accounting policies for revenue recognition under the new guidance for periods beginning after December 31, 2017.
Accounting for Income Taxes: Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory. In 2016, the FASB amended the guidance related to the accounting for income tax consequences of intra-entity transfers of assets other than inventory. The guidance requires an entity to recognize the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory when the transfer occurs, rather than the previous requirement to defer recognition of current and deferred income taxes for an intra-entity asset transfer until the asset had been sold to an outside party. This update does not change U.S. GAAP for the pre-tax effects of an intra-entity asset transfer or for an intra-entity transfer of inventory. We adopted this new guidance as of January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective transition method, and recorded a net reduction of $4.5 million to opening retained earnings to reflect the cumulative effect recognized as of the date of initial application in the first quarter of 2018.
In July 2015, the FASB issued updated guidance that simplifies the subsequent measurement of inventory. It replacesadoption for the current lowerand deferred income tax consequences of cost or market test withan intra-entity sale of mats from the lowerU.S. to the U.K. completed prior to 2018.
Statement of cost or net realizable value test. Net realizable value is defined as the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. We will adopt the new guidance prospectively in the first quarter of 2017 and do not expect the adoption to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Cash Flows. In February 2016, the FASB issued updated guidance regarding accounting for leases. The new accounting standard provides principles for the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of leases and requires lessees to recognize both assets and liabilities arising from financing and operating leases. The classification as either a financing or operating lease will determine whether lease expense is recognized based on an effective interest method basis or on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease, respectively. The new guidance is effective for us in the first quarter of 2019 with early adoption permitted. Based on our current lease portfolio, we anticipate the new guidance will require us to reflect additional assets and liabilities in our consolidated balance sheet, however, we have not yet completed an estimation of such amount and we are still evaluating the overall impact of the new guidance on our consolidated financial statements.
In March 2016, the FASB issued updated guidance that simplifies several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the requirement to recognize excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies through earnings as a component of income tax expense. Under current U.S. GAAP, these differences are generally recorded in additional paid in capital and thus have no impact on net income. The change in treatment of excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies also impacts the computation of diluted earnings per share and the associated cash flows will now be classified as operating activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows. In addition, entities will be permitted to make an accounting policy election related to forfeitures which impacts the timing of recognition for share-based payment awards. Forfeitures can be estimated, as required under current U.S. GAAP, or recognized when they occur. We will adopt the new guidance in the first quarter of 2017 with the most significant impact related to income tax consequences. Upon adoption, any excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies on share-based payment transactions will be recognized as a component of income tax expense as discrete items in the reporting period in which they occur. In addition, we will elect to continue estimating forfeitures in determining share-based compensation expense.
In August 2016, the FASB issued updated guidance that clarifies how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. This update provides guidance on eight specific cash flow issues. We adopted this new guidance as of January 1, 2018. The adoption of this new guidance had no impact on our historical financial statements or related disclosures.
Standards Not Yet Adopted
Credit Losses. In 2016, the FASB issued new guidance which requires financial assets measured at amortized cost basis, including trade receivables, to be presented at the net amount expected to be collected. The new guidance requires an entity to estimate its lifetime “expected credit loss” for such assets at inception which will generally result in the earlier recognition of allowances for losses. This guidance is effective for us in the first quarter of 20182020. We will include incremental disclosures in our 2020 financial statements regarding our credit loss policies and should be applied usingrelated amounts. We have adopted the new guidance utilizing the modified retrospective transition method to each period presented. Early adoption is permitted but all changes must be adopted in the same period. We do not expect the adoption of this new guidance to have a material impact on the presentation of our consolidated statements of cash flows.
In October 2016, the FASB amended the guidance related to the recognition of current and deferred income taxes for intra-entity asset transfers. Under current U.S. GAAP, recognition of income taxes on intra-entity asset transfers is prohibited until the asset has been sold to an outside party. This update requires that entities recognize the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory when the transfer occurs. This update does not change U.S. GAAP for the pre-tax effects of an intra-entity asset transfer or for an intra-entity transfer of inventory. This guidance is effective for us in the first quarter of 2018 and should be applied using a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative-effectJanuary 1, 2020. The cumulative effect adjustment directly to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption. We are currently evaluating the impact of the new guidance on our consolidated financial statements.
In November 2016, the FASB issued updated guidance that requires that the statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents. Therefore, amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. This guidance is effective for us in the first quarter of 2018 with early adoption permitted and should be applied using a retrospective transition method to each period presented. We are currently evaluating the impact of the new guidance on our consolidated financial statements.
In January 2017, the FASB amended the guidance related to the accounting for goodwill impairments by eliminating step two from the goodwill impairment test. Under the new guidance, if the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss shall be recognized in an amount equal to that excess, limited to the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. This guidance is effective for us for goodwill impairment tests beginning after December 15, 2019. This guidance should be applied prospectively and earlyupon adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of the new guidance on our consolidated financial statements.not material.


NEWPARK RESOURCES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)




Note 2  Business Combinations
In August 2016,October 2019, we completed the acquisition of Pragmatic Drilling Fluids Additives, Ltd.Cleansorb Limited (“Pragmatic”Cleansorb”), a CanadianU.K. based provider of specialty chemicals for the oil and natural gas industry, which further expands our completion fluids technology portfolio and capabilities. The purchase price for this acquisition was $4.4$18.7 million, net of cash acquired. The purchase price allocation resulted in amortizable intangible assets of $1.7 million and goodwill of approximately $1.7 million. Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible and intangible assets acquired, and is not deductible for tax purposes.
was funded with borrowings under the ABL Facility. The results of operations of PragmaticCleansorb are reported within the Fluids Systems segment for the period subsequent to the date of the acquisition.
The Cleansorb transaction has been recorded using the acquisition method of accounting and accordingly, assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date. The acquisition resulted in the recognition of $8.3 million in other intangible assets consisting primarily of customer relationships, technology, and tradename. All of the other intangibles are finite-lived intangible assets that are expected to be amortized over periods of 12 to 15 years with a weighted average amortization period of approximately 14 years. The excess of the total consideration was recorded as goodwill, which is not deductible for tax purposes. The fair values of the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed were based on the company’s estimates and assumptions using various market, income, and cost valuation approaches, which are classified within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
The following table summarizes the amounts recognized for the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the October 8, 2019 acquisition date.
(in thousands)
Receivables2,691
Intangible assets8,268
Other assets974
  Total assets acquired11,933
  
Deferred tax liabilities1,197
Other liabilities1,302
  Total liabilities assumed2,499
  
Net assets purchased9,434
Goodwill9,258
Net cash conveyed at closing$18,692

In November 2017, we acquired certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of Well Service Group, Inc. and Utility Access Solutions, Inc. (together, “WSG”). The purchase price for this acquisition was $77.4 million, net of cash acquired, which included $45.0 million of total cash consideration and the issuance of approximately 3.4 million shares of our common equity valued at $32.4 million. In 2018, $0.2 million of the total cash consideration was paid as part of the final working capital settlement. The results of operations of WSG are reported within the Mats and Integrated Services segment for the period subsequent to the date of the acquisition.
Results of operations and pro-forma combined results of operations for thethese acquired businessbusinesses have not been presented as the effect of this acquisition isthese acquisitions are not material to our consolidated financial statements.

Note 3 — Inventories
Inventories consisted of the following items at December 31:

NEWPARK RESOURCES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

(In thousands)2016 2015
Raw materials:   
Drilling fluids$115,399
 $133,934
Mats1,137
 657
Total raw materials116,536
 134,591
Blended drilling fluids components23,762
 25,343
Finished goods - mats3,314
 3,723
Total inventories$143,612
 $163,657

(In thousands)2019 2018
Raw materials:   
Fluids systems$141,314
 $148,737
Mats and integrated services5,049
 1,485
Total raw materials146,363
 150,222
Blended fluids systems components39,542
 38,088
Finished goods - mats10,992
 8,586
Total inventories$196,897
 $196,896

Raw materials consistfor the Fluids Systems segment consists primarily of barite, chemicals, and other additives that are consumed in the production of our drilling fluidfluids systems. Raw materials for the Mats and Integrated Services segment consists primarily of resins, chemicals, and other materials used to manufacture composite mats, as well as materials that are consumed in providing spill containment and other services to our customers. Our blended drilling fluids systems components consist of base drilling fluid systems that have been either mixed internally at our mixing plantsblending facilities or purchased from third partythird-party vendors. These base drilling fluid systems require raw materials to be added, as needed to meet specified customer requirements.
In 2016 and 2015, charges of $4.1 million and $2.2 million, respectively, are included in cost of revenues for the Fluids Systems segment related to the reduction in carrying values of certain inventory, primarily resulting from lower of cost or market adjustments. Charges in 2016 primarily related to the Asia Pacific and North America regions and charges in 2015 related to the North America region.

Note 4 — Property, Plant and Equipment
Our investment in property,Property, plant and equipment consisted of the following at December 31:
(In thousands)2016 20152019 2018
Land$11,505
 $11,613
$11,869
 $11,338
Buildings and improvements121,967
 122,514
130,895
 131,128
Machinery and equipment248,229
 224,974
295,622
 291,081
Computer hardware and software30,544
 29,688
40,880
 35,730
Furniture and fixtures5,829
 5,788
5,921
 5,725
Construction in progress19,417
 20,950
13,091
 12,960
437,491
 415,527
498,278
 487,962
Less accumulated depreciation(186,700) (164,818)(259,205) (239,643)
250,791
 250,709
239,073
 248,319
      
Composite mats (rental fleet)100,543
 100,341
125,300
 120,644
Less accumulated depreciation - composite mats(47,680) (43,418)(53,964) (52,670)
52,863
 56,923
71,336
 67,974
      
Property, plant and equipment, net$303,654
 $307,632
$310,409
 $316,293
NEWPARK RESOURCES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


Depreciation expense was $34.6$42.8 million, $39.3$41.2 million, and $33.2$36.4 million in 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014,2017, respectively. As described in Note 1, we revised our estimated useful lives and end of life residual values for composite mats included in our rental fleet as of January 1, 2016 resulting in a decrease in depreciation expense of approximately $6.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. Capital expenditures in 2016 included approximately $32.3 million in the Fluids Systems segment, including a total of $27.8 million related to the facility upgrade and expansion of our Fourchon, Louisiana facility, our new fluids blending facility and distribution center in Conroe, Texas, and equipment to support the contract with Total S.A. in Uruguay. Capital expenditures for the Mats and Integrated Services segment totaled $4.6 million during 2016.
In 2016, we recognized a $3.8 million non-cash charge to write-down property, plant and equipment to its estimated fair value in the Asia Pacific region of our Fluids Systems segment resulting from the continuing unfavorable industry market conditions and the deteriorating outlook for the region and a $0.5 million non-cash charge in our Fluids Systems segment to write-down property, plant and equipment associated with the wind-down of our operations in Uruguay. In 2015, we recognized a $2.6 million charge related to assets at a facility in our Fluids Systems segment following our decision to exit this facility. These charges are included in impairments and other charges in our consolidated statement of operations. We used internally developed assumptions in determining the fair values of property, plant and equipment, which are classified within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

Note 5 — Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill by reportable segment are as follows:
(In thousands)Fluids
Systems
 Mats and
Integrated
Services
 Total
Balance at December 31, 2017$1,782
 $41,838
 $43,620
Acquisition
 562
 562
Effects of foreign currency(141) (209) (350)
Balance at December 31, 20181,641
 42,191
 43,832
Acquisition9,258
 
 9,258
Impairment(11,422) 
 (11,422)
Effects of foreign currency523
 141
 664
Balance at December 31, 2019$
 $42,332
 $42,332


NEWPARK RESOURCES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

(In thousands)Fluids
Systems
 Mats and
Integrated
Services
 Total
Balance at December 31, 2014$72,684
 $19,209
 $91,893
Impairment(70,720) 
 (70,720)
Effects of foreign currency(1,964) (200) (2,164)
Balance at December 31, 2015
 19,009
 19,009
Acquisition1,720
 
 1,720
Effects of foreign currency(54) (680) (734)
Balance at December 31, 20161,666
 18,329
 19,995

Goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets are tested for impairment annually as of November 1, or more frequently, if an indication of impairment exists. We determine any impairment of goodwill by comparing the carrying amounts of our reporting units with fair values, which we estimate using a combination of a market multiple and discounted cash flow approach (classified within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy). We also compare the aggregate fair values of our reporting units with our market capitalization. We completed ourthe annual evaluation of the carrying values of our goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets as of November 1, 2016 and determined that the carrying values of each of our reporting units were less than their respective fair values and therefore, no impairment was required.
In 2015, as2019. As a result of the further decline in commodity prices and drilling activities includingand the projection of lower commodity prices and drilling activities,continued softness in the U.S. land market, as well as the further decline in the quoted market prices of our common stock, we determined that it was more likely than not that the carrying value of our drilling fluidsFluids Systems reporting unit exceeded its estimated fair value.value such that goodwill was potentially impaired. As a result, we completed step two of the evaluation to measure the amount of goodwill impairment determining a full impairment of goodwill related to the drilling fluidsFluids Systems reporting unit was required. As such, in the fourth quarter of 2019, we recorded a $70.7an $11.4 million non-cash impairment charge to write-off all of the goodwill related to the drilling fluidsFluids Systems reporting unit. We also determined that the Mats and Integrated Services reporting unit did not have a fair value below its net carrying value and therefore, no impairment was required.
Our impairment test included a comparison of the carrying value of net assets of our reporting units, including goodwill, with their estimated fair values, which is includedwe estimate using a combination of a market multiple and discounted cash flow approach. Significant assumptions inherent in impairmentsthe evaluation include the estimated growth rates for future revenues and other charges in our consolidated statement of operations.
NEWPARK RESOURCES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


the discount rate. Our assumptions were based on historical data supplemented by current and anticipated market conditions.
Other intangible assets consistconsisted of the following:
 December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
(In thousands)Gross
Carrying
Amount
 Accumulated
Amortization
 Other
Intangible
Assets, Net
 Gross
Carrying
Amount
 Accumulated
Amortization
 Other
Intangible
Assets, Net
Technology related$20,222
 $(6,516) $13,706
 $17,380
 $(5,509) $11,871
Customer related33,697
 (18,234) 15,463
 40,662
 (27,891) 12,771
Employment related
 
 
 1,845
 (1,845) 
Total amortizing intangible assets53,919
 (24,750) 29,169
 59,887
 (35,245) 24,642
            
Permits and licenses508
 
 508
 518
 
 518
Total indefinite-lived intangible assets508
 
 508
 518
 
 518
Total intangible assets$54,427
 $(24,750) $29,677
 $60,405
 $(35,245) $25,160
 December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015
(In thousands)Gross
Carrying
Amount
 Accumulated
Amortization
 Other
intangible
assets, net
 Gross
Carrying
Amount
 Accumulated
Amortization
 Other
intangible
assets, net
Technology related$5,766
 $(3,873) $1,893
 $5,077
 $(3,600) $1,477
Customer related25,158
 (21,962) 3,196
 28,069
 (19,638) 8,431
Employment related1,848
 (1,346) 502
 1,625
 (975) 650
Total amortizing intangible assets32,772
 (27,181) 5,591
 34,771
 (24,213) 10,558
            
Permits and licenses476
 
 476
 493
 
 493
Total indefinite-lived intangible assets476
 
 476
 493
 
 493
Total intangible assets$33,248
 $(27,181) $6,067
 $35,264
 $(24,213) $11,051

Total amortization expense in 2016, 2015 and 2014 related to other intangible assets was $3.4$4.4 million, $4.6$4.7 million and $8.0$3.3 million in 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
In 2016, we recognized a $3.1 million charge for the impairment of customer related intangible assets in the Asia Pacific region of our Fluids Systems segment resulting from the continuing unfavorable industry market conditions and the deteriorating outlook for the region, which is included in impairments and other charges in our consolidated statement of operations. Also,October 2019, we completed the acquisition of Pragmatic in 2016 resultingCleansorb, which resulted in additions to amortizable intangible assets of $1.7$8.3 million. See Note 2 for further discussion. We used internally developed assumptions in determining the fair values of intangible assets impaired and acquired, which are classified within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.additional information.
Estimated future amortization expense for the years ended December 31 is as follows:
(In thousands)2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Thereafter Total
Technology related$1,353
 $1,298
 $1,237
 $1,068
 $1,044
 $7,706
 $13,706
Customer related1,416
 996
 783
 663
 1,458
 10,147
 15,463
Total future amortization expense$2,769
 $2,294
 $2,020
 $1,731
 $2,502
 $17,853
 $29,169
(In thousands)2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Thereafter Total
Technology related$339
 $339
 $339
 $310
 $259
 $307
 $1,893
Customer related1,632
 584
 419
 313
 184
 64
 3,196
Employment related437
 65
 
 
 
 
 502
Total future amortization expense$2,408
 $988
 $758
 $623
 $443
 $371
 $5,591

The weighted average amortization period for technology related customer related and employmentcustomer related intangible assets is 15 years, 914 years and 512 years, respectively.
 
Note 6 — Financing arrangements

Financing arrangements consisted of the following at December 31, 2016 and 2015:
(In thousands)December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015
 Principal Amount Unamortized Discount and Debt Issuance Costs Total Debt Principal Amount Unamortized Discount and Debt Issuance Costs Total Debt
Convertible Notes due 2017$83,256
 $(268) $82,988
 $172,497
 $(1,296) $171,201
Convertible Notes due 2021100,000
 (27,100) 72,900
 
 
 
Revolving credit facility
 
 
 
 
 
ABL Facility
 
 
 
 
 
Other debt380
 
 380
 7,392
 
 7,392
Total debt183,636
 (27,368) 156,268
 179,889
 (1,296) 178,593
Less: current portion(83,636) 268
 (83,368) (7,382) 
 (7,382)
Long-term debt$100,000
 $(27,100) $72,900
 $172,507
 $(1,296) $171,211
NEWPARK RESOURCES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)




Convertible Notes due 2017. In September 2010, we issued $172.5 million of unsecured convertible senior notes (“Convertible Notes due 2017”) that mature on October 1, 2017, of which, $83.3 million aggregate principal amount was outstanding at December 31, 2016. The notes bear interest at a rate of 4.0% per year, payable semiannually in arrears on April 1 and October 1 of each year. Holders may convert the notes at their option at any time prior to the close of business on the business day immediately preceding the October 1, 2017 maturity date. The conversion rate is initially 90.8893 shares of our common stock per $1,000 principal amount of notes (equivalent to an initial conversion price of $11.00 per share of common stock), subject to adjustment in certain circumstances. Upon conversion, the notes will be settled in shares of our common stock. We may not redeem the notes prior to their maturity date. In 2016, we repurchased $89.3 million aggregate principal amount of our Convertible Notes due 2017 for $87.3 million and recognized a net gain of $1.6 million reflecting the difference in the amount paid and the net carrying valueNote 6 — Financing Arrangements
Financing arrangements consisted of the extinguished debt, including debt issuance costs. We intend to use available cash on-hand, cash generated by operations, including U.S. income tax refunds, and estimated availability under our ABL Facility to repay the remainingfollowing:
 December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
(In thousands)Principal Amount Unamortized Discount and Debt Issuance Costs Total Debt Principal Amount Unamortized Discount and Debt Issuance Costs Total Debt
2021 Convertible Notes$100,000
 $(12,291) $87,709
 $100,000
 $(17,752) $82,248
ABL Facility65,000
 
 65,000
 76,300
 
 76,300
Other debt7,164
 
 7,164
 3,199
 
 3,199
Total debt172,164
 (12,291) 159,873
 179,499
 (17,752) 161,747
Less: current portion(6,335) 
 (6,335) (2,522) 
 (2,522)
Long-term debt$165,829
 $(12,291) $153,538
 $176,977
 $(17,752) $159,225
2021 Convertible Notes due 2017.
Convertible Notes due 2021.Notes. In December 2016, we issued $100.0 million of unsecured convertible senior notes (“2021 Convertible Notes due 2021”Notes”) that mature on December 1, 2021, unless earlier converted by the holders pursuant to the terms of the notes. The notes bear interest at a rate of 4.0% per year, payable semiannually in arrears on June 1 and December 1 of each year.
Holders may convert the notes at their option at any time prior to the close of business on the business day immediately preceding June 1, 2021, only under the following circumstances:
during any calendar quarter commencing after the calendar quarter ending on March 31, 2017 (and only during such calendar quarter), if the last reported sale price of our common stock for at least 20 trading days (regardless of whether consecutive) during a period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the immediately preceding calendar quarter is greater than or equal to 130% of the conversion price of the notes in effect on each applicable trading day;
during the five business day period after any five consecutive trading day period in which the trading price per $1,000 principal amount of notes for each trading day was less than 98% of the last reported sale price of our common stock on such date multiplied by the conversion rate on each such trading day; or
upon the occurrence of specified corporate events, as described in the indenture governing the notes, such as a consolidation, merger, or share exchange.
On or after June 1, 2021 until the close of business on the business day immediately preceding the maturity date, holders may convert their notes at any time, regardless of whether any of the foregoing conditions have been satisfied. As of February 24, 2017,18, 2020, the notes were not convertible.
The notes are convertible into, at our election, cash, shares of common stock, or a combination of both, subject to satisfaction of specified conditions and during specified periods, as described above. If converted, we currently intend to pay cash for the principal amount of the notes converted. The conversion rate is initially 107.1381 shares of our common stock per $1,000 principal amount of notes (equivalent to an initial conversion price of $9.33 per share of common stock), subject to adjustment in certain circumstances. We may not redeem the notes prior to their maturity date.
In accordance with accounting guidance for convertible debt with a cash conversion option, we separately accounted for the debt and equity components of the notes in a manner that reflected our estimated nonconvertible debt borrowing rate. We estimated the fair value of the debt component of the notes to be $75.2 million at the issuance date, assuming a 10.5% non-convertible borrowing rate. The carrying amount of the equity component was determined to be approximately $24.8 million by deducting the fair value of the debt component from the principal amount of the notes, and was recorded as an increase to additional paid-in capital, net of the related deferred tax liability of $8.7 million. The excess of the principal amount of the debt component over its carrying amount (the “debt discount”) is being amortized as interest expense over the term of the notes using the effective interest method.
We allocated transaction costs related to the issuance of the notes, including underwriting discounts, of $0.9 million and $2.7 million to the equity and debt components, respectively. Issuance costs attributable to the equity component were netted against the equity component recorded in additional paid-in capital. The amount of the equity component was $15.2 million at the time of issuance (net of issuance costs and the deferred tax liability related to the conversion feature) and is not remeasured as long as it continues to meet the conditions for equity classification.
We allocated transaction costs related to the issuance of the notes, including underwriting discounts, of

NEWPARK RESOURCES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


The $2.7 million and $0.9 million to the debt and equity components, respectively. Issuanceof issuance costs attributable to the debt component were netted against long-term debt and are being amortized to interest expense over the term of the notes using the effective interest method. Issuance costs attributable to the equity component were netted against the equity component recorded in additional paid-in capital. The carrying amount of the equity component, net of issuance costs and the deferred tax liability related to the conversion feature, was $15.2 million at December 31, 2016. As of December 31, 2016,2019, the carrying amount of the debt component was $72.9$87.7 million, which is net of the unamortized debt discount and issuance costs of $24.4$11.0 million and $2.7$1.3 million, respectively. Including the impact of the debt discount and related deferred debt issuance costs, the effective interest rate on the notes is approximately 11.3%.
NEWPARK RESOURCES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


Based on the closing market price of our common stock on December 31, 2016, the if-converted value of the notes was less than the aggregate principal amount of the notes.
Revolving Credit Facility. In March 2015, we entered into a Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) which provided for a $200.0 million revolving loan facility available for borrowings and letters of credit through March 2020. In December 2015, the Credit Agreement was amended, decreasing the revolving credit facility to $150.0 million and subsequently, we terminated the Credit Agreement in May 2016, replacing it with an asset-based revolving loan facility as discussed further below. As of the date of termination, we had no outstanding borrowings under the Credit Agreement. In the second quarter of 2016, we recognized a non-cash charge of $1.1 million in interest expense for the write-off of debt issuance costs in connection with the termination.
Asset-Based Loan Facility. In May 2016, we entered into an asset-based revolving credit agreement (thewhich replaced our previous credit agreement. In October 2017, we entered into an Amended and Restated Credit Agreement and in March 2019, we entered into a First Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (as amended, the “ABL Facility”) which replaced. The March 2019 amendment increased the terminated Credit Agreement. In February 2017, we amendedamount available for borrowings, reduced applicable borrowing rates, and extended the ABL Facility primarily to incorporate the Convertible Notes due 2021 that were issued in December 2016 as well as other administrative matters.term. The ABL Facility provides financing of up to $90.0$200.0 million available for borrowings (inclusive of letters of credit) and subject to certain conditions, can be increased up to a maximum capacity of $150.0$275.0 million, subject to certain conditions. As of December 31, 2019, our total availability under the ABL Facility was $156.8 million, of which $65.0 million was drawn, resulting in remaining availability of $91.8 million.
The ABL Facility terminates onin March 6, 2020;2024; however, the ABL Facility has a springing maturity date that will accelerate the maturity of the credit facilityABL Facility to June 30, 2017September 1, 2021 if, prior to such date, the 2021 Convertible Notes due 2017 have not either been repurchased, redeemed, convertedrefinanced, exchanged or otherwise satisfied in full or we have not providedescrowed an amount of funds, that together with the amount that we establish as a reserve against our borrowing capacity, is sufficient funds to repayfor the future settlement of the 2021 Convertible Notes due 2017 in full onat their maturity date. For this purpose, funds may be provided in cash to an escrow agent or a combination of cash to an escrow agent and the assignment of a portion of availability under the ABL Facility.maturity. The ABL Facility requires compliance with a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio and minimum unused availability of $25.0 million to utilize borrowings or assignment of availability under the ABL Facility towards funding the repayment of the 20172021 Convertible Notes.
Borrowing availability under the ABL Facility is calculated based on eligible accounts receivable, inventory, and, subject to satisfaction of certain financial covenants as described below, composite mats included in the rental fleet, net of reserves and limits on such assets included in the borrowing base calculation. To the extent pledged by us, the borrowing base calculation shall also includeincludes the amount of eligible pledged cash. The lender may establish such reserves, in part based on appraisals of the asset base, and other limits at its discretion which could reduce the amounts otherwise available under the ABL Facility. Availability associated with eligible rental mats will also be subject to maintaining a minimum consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio and a minimum level of operating income for the Mats and Integrated Services segment. As of December 31, 2016, we had no borrowings outstanding under the ABL Facility with a total borrowing base availability of $60.5 million. Including the addition of eligible composite mats included in the rental fleet beginning in 2017, total borrowing base availability as of January 1, 2017 was $76.3 million.
Under the terms of the ABL Facility, we may elect to borrow at a variable interest rate plus an applicable margin based on either, (1) LIBOR subject to a floor of zero or (2) a base rate equal to the highest of: (a) the federal funds rate plus 50 basis points, (b) the prime rate of Bank of America, N.A. orand (c) LIBOR, subject to a floor of zero, plus 100 basis points.points, plus, in each case, an applicable margin per annum. The applicable margin ranges from 225150 to 350200 basis points for LIBOR borrowings, and 12550 to 250100 basis points with respect tofor base rate borrowings, based on our consolidated EBITDA, ratio of debt to consolidated EBITDA, andthe consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio each as defined in the ABL Facility. As of December 31, 2016,2019, the applicable margin for borrowings under our ABL Facility is 350was 150 basis points with respect to LIBOR borrowings and 25050 basis points with respect to base rate borrowings. The weighted average interest rate for the ABL Facility was 3.2% at December 31, 2019. In addition, we are required to pay a commitment fee on the unused portion of the ABL Facility ranging from 37.525 to 62.537.5 basis points, based on the ratiolevel of debt to consolidated EBITDA,outstanding borrowings, as defined in the ABL Facility. TheAs of December 31, 2019, the applicable commitment fee as of December 31, 2016 was 62.537.5 basis points.
The ABL Facility is a senior secured obligation, secured by first liens on substantially all of our U.S. tangible and intangible assets, and a portion of the capital stock of our non-U.S. subsidiaries has also been pledged as collateral. The ABL Facility contains customary operating covenants and certain restrictions including, among other things, the incurrence of additional debt, liens, dividends, asset sales, investments, mergers, acquisitions, affiliate transactions, stock repurchases and other restricted payments. The ABL Facility also requires compliance with a fixed charge coverage ratio if availability under the ABL Facility falls below $25.0$22.5 million. In addition, the ABL Facility contains customary events of default, including, without limitation, a failure to make payments under the facility, acceleration of more than $25.0 million of other indebtedness, certain bankruptcy events, and certain change of control events.
Other Debt. Our foreign subsidiaries in Italy, India, the United Kingdom, and India,Canada maintain local credit arrangements consisting primarily of lines of credit or overdraft facilities which are renewed on an annual basis. In December 2016, we terminated our revolving line of credit in Brazil and repaid the outstanding balance. We utilize local financing arrangements in our foreign operations in order to provide short-term local liquidity needs. Advances under these short-term credit arrangements are typically based on a percentage of the subsidiary’s accounts receivable or firm contracts with certain customers. TotalWe had $4.8 million and $1.1 million, respectively, outstanding balances under these arrangements and other domestic financing arrangements were $0.4 million and $7.4 million at December 31, 20162019 and 2015,December 31, 2018.
We incurred net interest expense of $14.4 million, $14.9 million and $13.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. There was 0 capitalized interest for the years ended December 31, 2019 or 2018. Capitalized interest was $0.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2017. Scheduled repayment of long-term debt as of December 31, 2019 was $100.0 million in 2021 and $65.0 million in 2024.

NEWPARK RESOURCES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)



At December 31, 2016, we had letters of credit issued and outstanding which totaled $5.9 million that are collateralized by $6.5 million in restricted cash. Additionally, our foreign operations had $11.3 million outstanding in letters of credit and other guarantees, primarily issued under the line of credit in Italy as well as certain letters of credit that are collateralized by $0.9 million in restricted cash. At December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, total restricted cash of $7.4 million and $17.5 million, respectively, was included in other current assets in the accompanying balance sheet.
We incurred net interest expense of $9.9 million, $9.1 million and $10.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Capitalized interest was $0.9 million, $1.1 million and $0.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 respectively. Scheduled repayment of long-term debt as of December 31, 2016 is $100.0 million in 2021.


Note 7 — Fair Value of Financial Instruments and Concentrations of Credit Risk
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Our financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, receivables, payables, and debt. We believe the carrying values of these instruments, with the exception of our 2021 Convertible Notes, due 2017 and our Convertible Notes due 2021, approximated their fair values at December 31, 20162019 and December 31, 2015.2018. The estimated fair value of our 2021 Convertible Notes due 2017 was $84.4$101.4 million and $120.9 million at December 31, 20162019 and $154.4 million at December 31, 2015, and the estimated fair value of our Convertible Notes due 2021 was $110.5 million at December 31, 2016,2018, respectively, based on quoted market prices at these respective dates.
Concentrations of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject us to significant concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash and trade accounts and notes receivable. At December 31, 2016,2019, substantially all of our cash deposits arewere held by our international subsidiaries in accounts at numerous financial institutions across the various regions thatin which we operate in.operate. A majority of the cash iswas held in accounts that maintain deposit ratings of P-1 by Moody’s, A-1 by Standard and Poor’s, and F1 by Fitch. As part of our investment strategy, we perform periodic evaluations of the relative credit standing of these financial institutions.
Accounts ReceivableReceivables
Accounts receivableReceivables consisted of the following at December 31, 2016 and 2015 include the following:31:
(In thousands)2019 2018
Trade receivables:   
Gross trade receivables$207,554
 $248,176
Allowance for doubtful accounts(6,007) (10,034)
Net trade receivables201,547
 238,142
Income tax receivables7,393
 9,027
Other receivables7,774
 7,225
Total receivables, net$216,714
 $254,394
(In thousands)2016 2015
Gross trade receivables$162,569
 $159,119
Allowance for doubtful accounts(8,849) (7,189)
Net trade receivables153,720
 151,930
Income tax receivables39,944
 32,600
Other receivables20,643
 21,834
Total receivables, net$214,307
 $206,364
At December 31, 2016, income tax receivables includes approximately $38.0 million related to our decision to amend prior U.S. federal income tax returns and request a refund for the carryback of U.S. federal tax losses incurred in 2016. At December 31, 2015, income tax receivables included approximately $29.0 million related to the refund for the carryback of U.S. federal tax losses incurred in 2015, which were substantially received in 2016.
Other receivables includes $11.5included $6.2 million and $10.4$6.3 million for value added, goods and service taxes related to foreign jurisdictions as of December 31, 20162019 and 2015,2018, respectively. In addition, other receivables includes $8.0 million at December 31, 2016 and 2015 in connection with the March 2014 sale of the Environmental Services business that is held in escrow associated with transaction representations, warranties and indemnities. In December 2014, the buyer made certain claims for indemnification under the terms of the sale agreement, which defers the release of the escrow funds until such claims are resolved. Further discussion of the buyer’s claims and related litigation is contained in Note 15 below.
Customer Revenue Concentration
We derive a significant portion of our revenues from companies in the E&P industry, and our customer base is highly concentrated in mid-sized and international oil companies as well as government-owned or government-controlled oil companies operating in the markets that we serve. For 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014,2017, revenues from our 20 largest customers represented approximately 53%42%, 49%44% and 40%45%, respectively, of our consolidated revenues from continuing operations.revenues. For 2016, revenue from Sonatrach, our primary customer in Algeria, represented approximately 14% of consolidated revenues,2019, 2018 and as of December 31, 2016, receivables from Sonatrach were approximately 14% of net trade receivables. For 2015 and 2014,2017, no single customer accounted for more than 10% of our consolidated revenues.
NEWPARK RESOURCES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts based upon the expected collectability of accounts receivable. Changes in this allowance for 2016, 2015 and 2014 related to continuing operations, waswere as follows:
(In thousands)2019 2018 2017
Balance at beginning of year$10,034
 $9,457
 $8,849
Provision for doubtful accounts1,792
 2,849
 1,481
Write-offs, net of recoveries(5,819) (2,272) (873)
Balance at end of year$6,007
 $10,034
 $9,457
(In thousands)2016 2015 2014
Balance at beginning of year$7,189
 $5,458
 $4,142
Provision for uncollectible accounts2,416
 1,886
 1,246
Write-offs, net of recoveries(756) (155) 70
Balance at end of year$8,849
 $7,189
 $5,458
The Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows also includes an insignificant provision for uncollectible accounts in 2014 related to the Environmental Services business that is classified as discontinued operations.


Note 8 — Leases
We lease certain office space, manufacturing facilities, warehouses, land, and equipment. Our leases have remaining terms ranging from 1 to 12 years with various extension and termination options. We consider these options in determining the lease term used to establish our operating lease assets and liabilities. Lease agreements with lease and non-lease components are accounted for as a single lease component. Leases with an initial term of 12 months or less are not recorded in the balance sheet; we recognize lease expense for these leases on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
Leases consisted of the following:

NEWPARK RESOURCES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


(In thousands)Balance Sheet ClassificationDecember 31, 2019
Assets:  
OperatingOperating lease assets$32,009
FinanceProperty, plant and equipment, net1,135
Total lease assets $33,144
Liabilities:  
Current:  
OperatingAccrued liabilities$6,105
FinanceCurrent debt287
Noncurrent:  
OperatingNoncurrent operating lease liabilities$26,946
FinanceLong-term debt, less current portion829
Total lease liabilities $34,167

Total operating lease expenses were $30.1 million for 2019, of which $19.5 million related to short-term leases and $10.6 million related to leases recognized in the balance sheet. Total operating lease expenses were $27.4 million and $23.9 million for 2018 and 2017, respectively. Total operating lease expenses approximate cash paid during each period. Amortization and interest for finance leases are not material. Operating lease expenses and amortization of leased assets for finance leases are included in either cost of revenues or selling, general and administrative expenses. Interest for finance leases is included in interest expense, net.

NEWPARK RESOURCES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


The maturity of lease liabilities as of December 31, 2019 is as follows:
(In thousands)Operating Leases Finance Leases Total
2020$7,528
 $330
 $7,858
20215,932
 329
 6,261
20224,351
 329
 4,680
20233,199
 221
 3,420
20242,760
 
 2,760
Thereafter17,165
 
 17,165
Total lease payments40,935
 1,209
 42,144
Less: Interest7,884
 93
 7,977
Present value of lease liabilities$33,051
 $1,116
 $34,167

During 2019, we entered into $12.1 million of new operating lease liabilities in exchange for leased assets.
Lease Term and Discount RateDecember 31, 2019
Weighted-average remaining lease term (years)
Operating leases8.5
Finance leases3.7
Weighted-average discount rate
Operating leases4.8%
Finance leases4.5%

As previously disclosed in our 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K and under the previous lease accounting guidance, future minimum payments under non-cancelable operating leases at December 31, 2018, with initial or remaining terms in excess of one year are included in the table below. Future minimum payments under capital leases were not significant.
(In thousands) 
2019$9,112
20205,707
20214,630
20223,816
20233,144
Thereafter4,507
 $30,916


NEWPARK RESOURCES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


Note 9 — Income Taxes
The U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“Tax Act”) was enacted in December 2017 resulting in broad and complex changes to U.S. income tax law. The Tax Act included a one-time transition tax in 2017 on accumulated foreign subsidiary earnings not previously subject to U.S. income tax, reduced the U.S. corporate statutory tax rate from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018, generally eliminated U.S. federal income tax on dividends from foreign subsidiaries, created new tax on certain foreign-sourced earnings, made other changes to limit certain deductions and changed rules on how certain tax credits and net operating loss carryforwards can be utilized. Due to the timing of the enactment and the complexity involved in applying the provisions of the Tax Act, we made reasonable estimates of the effects and recorded provisional amounts in our 2017 financial statements.
The net tax benefit recognized in 2017 related to the Tax Act was $3.4 million. As we completed our analysis of the Tax Act in 2018 for purposes of finalizing our 2017 U.S. federal income tax return, including assessment of additional guidance provided by regulatory bodies, we revised the cumulative net tax benefit related to the Tax Act to $5.0 million by recognizing an additional $1.6 million net tax benefit for 2018.
For 2019 and 2018, our income tax provision includes the estimated expense for any U.S. federal and state income taxes from the new tax on certain foreign-sourced earnings as well as any additional foreign withholding taxes related to future repatriation of current year earnings in our non-U.S. subsidiaries held directly by a U.S. parent.
The provision (benefit) for income taxes related to continuing operations was as follows:
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
(In thousands)2016 2015 20142019 2018 2017
Current:          
U.S. Federal$(37,854) $(32,272) $17,086
$1,892
 $805
 $(236)
State20
 (34) 2,170
706
 1,384
 561
Foreign10,440
 11,411
 9,925
11,440
 12,572
 10,301
Total current(27,394) (20,895) 29,181
14,038
 14,761
 10,626
Deferred:          
U.S. Federal2,670
 (2,624) 12,237
(2,926) (331) (3,848)
State(181) 179
 (174)1,181
 66
 (796)
Foreign863
 1,942
 (196)(2,505) 501
 (1,089)
Total deferred3,352
 (503) 11,867
(4,250) 236
 (5,733)
Total income tax expense (benefit)$(24,042) $(21,398) $41,048
Total provision for income taxes$9,788
 $14,997
 $4,893
The total provision (benefit) was allocated to the following components of income (loss):
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
(In thousands)2016 2015 20142019 2018 2017
Income (loss) from continuing operations$(24,042) $(21,398) $41,048
$9,788
 $14,997
 $4,893
Income from discontinued operations
 
 12,475
Total provision (benefit)$(24,042) $(21,398) $53,523
Loss from discontinued operations
 
 (4,616)
Total provision for income taxes$9,788
 $14,997
 $277
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes was as follows:
 Year Ended December 31,
(In thousands)2019 2018 2017
U.S.$(15,270) $4,084
 $(27,282)
Foreign12,112
 43,194
 43,394
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes$(3,158) $47,278
 $16,112
 Year Ended December 31,
(In thousands)2016 2015 2014
U.S.$(76,805) $(122,082) $88,964
Foreign12,051
 9,856
 31,093
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes$(64,754) $(112,226) $120,057
NEWPARK RESOURCES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)



The effective income tax rate for continuing operations is reconciled to the statutory federal income tax rate as follows:

NEWPARK RESOURCES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

 Year Ended December 31,
 2016 2015 2014
Income tax expense (benefit) at federal statutory rate(35.0%) (35.0%) 35.0%
Nondeductible expenses2.8% 2.8% 2.9%
Worthless stock deduction - Brazil(14.4%) % %
Goodwill and other asset impairments3.5% 15.7% %
Manufacturing deduction0.8% 1.8% (1.9%)
Different rates on earnings of foreign operations(1.2%) (3.6%) (4.3%)
Change in valuation allowance6.9% 2.8% 2.1%
Uncertain tax positions% (2.2%) 0.6%
State tax expense (benefit), net(2.5%) (1.5%) 1.0%
Other items, net2.0% 0.1% (1.2%)
Total income tax expense (benefit)(37.1%) (19.1%) 34.2%

 Year Ended December 31,
(In thousands)2019 2018 2017
Income tax expense (benefit) at federal statutory rate$(663) $9,929
 $5,639
Nondeductible executive compensation756
 1,165
 768
Nondeductible goodwill impairment2,401
 
 
Other nondeductible expenses1,506
 1,216
 1,368
Stock-based compensation(248) (786) 472
Different rates on earnings of foreign operations463
 912
 (2,139)
Dividend taxes on unremitted earnings1,609
 3,023
 1,506
U.S. tax on foreign earnings1,215
 333
 
Change in valuation allowance1,272
 (790) 240
State tax expense (benefit), net430
 1,298
 (283)
Net impact of Tax Act
 (1,613) (3,387)
Other items, net1,047
 310
 709
Total provision for income taxes$9,788
 $14,997
 $4,893

The provision for income taxes was $9.8 million for 2019 despite reporting a small pretax loss for the year. This result reflects the impact of the $11.4 million non-deductible goodwill impairment as well as the impact of the geographic composition of our pretax loss, where tax expense related to earnings from our international operations is only partially offset by the tax benefit from losses in the U.S. In addition, the provision for income taxes for 2019 includes a $1.4 million charge primarily related to the expiration of certain U.S. state net operating loss carryforwards. The provision for income taxes was $15.0 million for 2018. The provision for income taxes for 2018 includes a $1.6 million net benefit related to U.S. tax reform and was also favorably impacted by excess tax benefits related to the vesting of certain stock-based compensation awards and a reduction in the valuation allowance related to our U.K. subsidiary.
Although the U.S. corporate statutory tax rate was reduced from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018, our provision for income taxes beginning in 2018 also includes the new tax on certain foreign-sourced earnings as well as any additional foreign withholding taxes related to future repatriation of current year earnings from our non-U.S. subsidiaries. Due to the relative contribution of our domestic and foreign earnings, these taxes on certain foreign-sourced earnings effectively serve to increase our effective tax rate. Our effective tax rate in future periods will depend in large part on the relative contribution of our domestic and foreign earnings.
Our effective tax rate in 20162017 includes a $9.3$3.4 million benefit associated with a worthless stock deduction and related impactsresulting from restructuring the investment in our Brazilian subsidiary, partially offset by a $4.5 million chargeprovisional accounting for increases to the valuation allowance for certain deferred tax assets which may not be realized (primarily related to our Australian subsidiary and certain U.S. state net operating losses). OurTax Act as described above. In addition, the 2017 effective tax rate for 2015 was negatively impacted primarily impacted by the impairment of non-deductible goodwill. In addition, the 2015 income tax provision also includes a $4.6 million charge for increasesexpenses relative to the valuation allowance for certain deferred tax assets which may not be realized (primarily related to our Australian subsidiary and certain U.S. state net operating losses). These 2015 charges were partially offset by a $4.4 million benefit associated with the forgivenessamount of certain inter-company balances due from our Brazilian subsidiary and a $2.2 million benefit from the release of U.S. tax reserves, following the expiration of statutes of limitation.pre-tax income.

NEWPARK RESOURCES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


Temporary differences and carryforwards which give rise to deferred tax assets and liabilities consisted of the following at December 31, 2016 and 2015 are as follows:31:
(In thousands)2019 2018
Deferred tax assets:   
Net operating losses$14,205
 $14,054
Foreign tax credits5,651
 7,304
Accruals not currently deductible4,928
 3,209
Unrealized foreign exchange losses, net3,837
 3,575
Stock-based compensation3,380
 3,266
Capitalized inventory costs1,611
 1,972
Alternative minimum tax carryforwards369
 2,198
Other6,709
 6,631
Total deferred tax assets40,690
 42,209
Valuation allowance(23,962) (23,842)
Total deferred tax assets, net of allowances16,728
 18,367
Deferred tax liabilities:   
Accelerated depreciation and amortization(28,703) (29,656)
Tax on unremitted earnings(13,645) (16,174)
Original issue discount on 2021 Convertible Notes(2,311) (3,347)
Other(2,716) (2,160)
Total deferred tax liabilities(47,375) (51,337)
Total net deferred tax liabilities$(30,647) $(32,970)
    
Noncurrent deferred tax assets$3,600
 $4,516
Noncurrent deferred tax liabilities(34,247) (37,486)
Net deferred tax liabilities$(30,647) $(32,970)
(In thousands)2016 2015
Deferred tax assets:   
Net operating losses$18,771
 $14,800
Capitalized inventory costs12,378
 6,717
Stock based compensation6,955
 6,460
Accruals not currently deductible4,883
 6,157
Unrealized foreign exchange losses, net3,087
 3,013
Foreign tax credits3,269
 2,558
Other1,871
 599
Total deferred tax assets51,214
 40,304
Valuation allowance(21,847) (16,780)
Total deferred tax assets, net of allowances29,367
 23,524
Deferred tax liabilities:   
Accelerated depreciation and amortization(43,225) (38,034)
Original issue discount on Convertible Notes due 2021(8,553) 
Tax on unremitted earnings(8,555) (7,181)
Other(6,030) (2,856)
Total deferred tax liabilities(66,363) (48,071)
Total net deferred tax liabilities$(36,996) $(24,547)
    
Non-current deferred tax assets$1,747
 $1,821
Non-current deferred tax liabilities(38,743) (26,368)
Net deferred tax liabilities$(36,996) $(24,547)
NEWPARK RESOURCES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)



For state income tax purposes, we have net operating loss carryforwards (“NOLs”) of approximately $240.5$149.5 million available to reduce future state taxable income. These NOLs expire in varying amounts beginning in 20182020 through 2030.2039. Foreign NOLs of approximately $26.4$20.9 million are available to reduce future taxable income, some of which expire beginning in 2017.2020.
The realization of our net deferred tax assets is dependent on our ability to generate taxable income in future periods. At December 31, 20162019 and December 31, 2015,2018, we have recorded a valuation allowance in the amount of $21.8$24.0 million and $16.8$23.8 million, respectively, primarily related to certain U.S. state and foreign NOL carryforwards, including Brazil and Australia, as well as for certain tax credits recognized related to the accounting for the impact of the Tax Act, which may not be realized.
Unremitted foreign earnings permanently reinvested abroad upon which deferred income taxes have not been provided aggregated approximately $161.7 million and $142.8 million at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. It is not practicable to determine the amount of federal income taxes, if any, that might become due if such earnings are repatriated. We have the ability and intent to leave these foreign earnings permanently reinvested abroad.
We file income tax returns in the United States and several non-U.S. jurisdictions and are subject to examination in the various jurisdictions in which we file. We are no longer subject to income tax examinations for U.S. federal and substantially all state jurisdictions for years prior to 2012 and for substantially all foreign jurisdictions for years prior to 2008. In 2017, we received a Revenue Agent Report from the IRS disallowing a deduction claimed on our 2015 tax return associated with the forgiveness of certain inter-company balances due from our Brazilian subsidiary and assessing tax due of approximately $3.9 million. In 2019, we finalized the matter related to our 2015 U.S. tax return with no additional tax due.

NEWPARK RESOURCES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


Following an audit in 2015, the treasury authority in Mexico issued a tax assessment (inclusive of interest and penalties) in the amount of 60 million pesos (approximately $3.3 million) to our Mexico subsidiary primarily in connection with the export of mats from Mexico which took place in 2010.  The mats that are the subject of this assessment were owned by a U.S. subsidiary and leased to our Mexico subsidiary for matting projects in the Mexican market. In 2010, we made the decision to move these mats out of Mexico to markets with higher demand. The Mexican treasury authority determined the export of the mats was the equivalent of a sale and assessed taxes on the gross declared value of the exported mats to our Mexico subsidiary. We retained outside legal counsel and filed administrative appeals with the treasury authority, but we were notified in April 2018 that the last administrative appeal had been rejected. In response, we filed an appeal in the Mexican Federal Tax Court in the second quarter of 2018, which required that we post a bond in the amount of the assessed taxes (plus additional interest). In the fourth quarter of 2018, the Mexican Federal Tax Court issued a favorable judgment nullifying in full the tax assessment which was subsequently appealed by the treasury authority in Mexico. Following a judgment by the Mexican Court of Appeals, in the third quarter of 2019 the Mexican Federal Tax Court confirmed the full nullification of the tax assessment based on a due process violation and recognized the treasury authority's right to cure the due process violation by starting a new tax audit. The treasury authority in Mexico is appealing the latest judgment from the Mexican Federal Tax Court. Although the tax appeals process has not concluded, we believe our tax position is properly reported in accordance with applicable tax laws and regulations in Mexico and intend to vigorously defend our position through the tax appeals process.
We are currently under examination by the United States federal tax authorities for tax years 2014 and 2015 and by the State of Texas for tax years 2012 through 2015. In addition, we arealso under examination by various tax authorities in other countries.countries, and certain foreign jurisdictions have challenged the amounts of taxes due for certain tax periods. These audits are in various stages of completion. We fully cooperate with all audits, but defend existing positions vigorously. These audits are in various stages of completion and certain foreign jurisdictions have challenged the amount of taxes due for certain tax periods. We evaluate the potential exposure associated with various filing positions and record a liability for uncertain tax contingenciespositions as circumstances warrant. Although we believe all tax positions are reasonable and properly reported in accordance with applicable tax laws and regulations in effect during the periods involved, the final determination of tax audits and any related litigation could be materially different than that which is reflected in historical income tax provisions and tax contingency accruals.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending provision for uncertain tax positions is as follows: 
(In thousands)2019 2018 2017
Balance at January 1$223
 $257
 $665
Additions (reductions) for tax positions of prior years68
 (3) (399)
Additions (reductions) for tax positions of current year
 
 
Reductions for settlements with tax authorities
 
 
Reductions for lapse of statute of limitations
 (31) (9)
Balance at December 31$291
 $223
 $257
(In thousands)2016 2015 2014
Balance at January 1$419
 $3,786
 $2,175
Additions (reductions) for tax positions of prior years477
 (95) 1,604
Additions (reductions) for tax positions of current year
 
 7
Reductions for settlements with tax authorities
 (575) 
Reductions for lapse of statute of limitations(231) (2,697) 
Balance at December 31$665
 $419
 $3,786

Approximately $0.5$0.3 million of unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2016,2019, if recognized, would favorably impact the effective tax rate. In 2015, we recognized a $2.2 million benefit to the income tax provision relating to uncertain tax positions for which the applicable statutes of limitation expired.
We recognize accrued interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in operating expenses. We recognized an insignificantThe amount of interest and penalties in 2016 and approximately $0.1 million and $0.4 million during 2015 and 2014, respectively. We had approximately $0.1 million and $0.1 million accruedwas immaterial for interest and penalties at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.all periods presented.

NEWPARK RESOURCES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


Note 910 — Capital Stock
Common stockStock
Changes in outstanding Common Stockcommon stock were as follows:
(In thousands of shares)2019 2018 2017
Outstanding, beginning of year106,363
 104,572
 99,843
Shares issued for exercise of options281
 603
 416
Shares issued for time vested restricted stock (net of forfeitures)53
 1,188
 952
Shares issued for acquisition
 
 3,361
Outstanding, end of year106,697
 106,363
 104,572
(In thousands of shares)2016 2015 2014
Outstanding, beginning of year99,377
 99,204
 98,031
Shares issued for exercise of options125
 104
 540
Shares issued for time vested restricted stock (net of forfeitures)341
 69
 633
Outstanding, end of year99,843
 99,377
 99,204

Outstanding shares of common stock include shares held as treasury stock totaling 15,162,050, 15,302,34516,958,418, 15,530,952 and 15,210,23315,366,504 as of December 31, 2016, 2015 an 2014, respectively2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

NEWPARK RESOURCES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


Preferred stockStock
We are authorized to issue up to 1,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock,preferred stock, $0.01 par value. There was nowere 0 outstanding shares of preferred stock atas of December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 or 2014.2017.
Treasury stockStock
During 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014,2017, we repurchased 234,901, 292,168381,041, 362,190 and 215,760415,418 shares, respectively, for an aggregate price of $1.2$2.7 million, $2.3$3.9 million and $2.5$3.2 million, respectively, representing employee shares surrendered in lieu of taxes under vesting of employeerestricted stock awards. All of the shares repurchased are held as treasury stock.
During 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014,2017, we reissued 375,196, 200,0561,491,408, 197,742 and 155,650210,964 shares of treasury stock pursuant to various stock plans, including our employee stock purchase plan and our 2014 Non-Employee Directors’ Restricted Stock Plan.plans.
Repurchase programProgram
OurIn November 2018, our Board of Directors has approved aauthorized changes to our securities repurchase program. These changes increased the amount remaining under the repurchase program that authorizes usfrom $33.5 million to purchase up to $100.0$100 million, available for repurchases of any combination of our outstanding shares of common stock or outstandingand our 2021 Convertible Notes due 2017.Notes. The repurchase program has no specific term. We may repurchase shares or Convertible Notes due 2017 in the open market or as otherwise determined by management, subject to certain limitations under the ABL Facility and other factors. Repurchases are expected to be funded from operating cash flows, and available cash on-hand.on hand, and borrowings under our ABL Facility. As part of the share repurchase program, our management has been authorized to establish trading plans under Rule 10b5-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
During 2019, we repurchased an aggregate of 2,537,833 shares of our common stock under our Board authorized repurchase program for a total cost of $19.0 million. There were no0 shares repurchased under the program during 2016 and 2015. In 2014, we repurchased 4,317,278 shares of our common stock under this program for an average price per share, including commissions, of $11.72. In February 2016, we repurchased $11.2 million of our Convertible Notes due 2017 in the open market for $9.2 million. This repurchase was made under the existing Board authorized repurchase program discussed above.2018 or 2017. As of December 31, 2016,2019, we had $33.5$81.0 million of authorization remaining under the program. In addition, the Board separately authorized the repurchase of $78.1 million of Convertible Notes due 2017 in connection with the December 2016 issuance of $100.0 million of Convertible Notes due 2021.

NEWPARK RESOURCES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


Note 1011 — Earnings perPer Share
The following table presents the reconciliation of the numerator and denominator for calculating earnings per shareincome (loss) from continuing operations:operations per share:
 Year Ended December 31,
(In thousands, except per share data)2019 2018 2017
Numerator     
Income (loss) from continuing operations - basic and diluted$(12,946) $32,281
 $11,219
      
Denominator     
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic89,782
 89,996
 85,421
     Dilutive effect of stock options and restricted stock awards
 2,385
 2,554
Dilutive effect of 2021 Convertible Notes
 544
 
Weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted89,782
 92,925
 87,975
      
Income (loss) from continuing operations per common share     
Basic$(0.14) $0.36
 $0.13
Diluted$(0.14) $0.35
 $0.13
 Year Ended December 31,
(In thousands, except per share data)2016 2015 2014
Numerator     
Basic - income (loss) from continuing operations$(40,712) $(90,828) $79,009
    Assumed conversions of Convertible Notes due 2017
 
 5,091
Diluted - adjusted income (loss) from continuing operations$(40,712) $(90,828) $84,100
      
Denominator     
Basic - weighted average common shares outstanding83,697
 82,722
 82,999
     Dilutive effect of stock options and restricted stock awards
 
 1,733
     Dilutive effect of the Convertible Notes due 2017
 
 15,682
Dilutive effect of Convertible Notes due 2021
 
 
Diluted - weighted average common shares outstanding83,697
 82,722
 100,414
      
Net income (loss) from continuing operations per common share     
     Basic$(0.49) $(1.10) $0.95
     Diluted$(0.49) $(1.10) $0.84

We excluded the following weighted-average potential common shares from the calculations of diluted net income (loss) per common share during the applicable periods because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive:
 Year Ended December 31,
(In thousands)2019 2018 2017
Stock options and restricted stock awards5,312
 1,495
 7,419
2017 Convertible Notes
 
 5,702
 Year Ended December 31,
(In thousands)2016 2015 2014
Stock options and restricted stock-based awards7,482
 3,884
 788
Convertible Notes due 201714,295
 15,682
 
Convertible Notes due 2021
 
 

The 2021 Convertible Notes due 2021 will notonly impact the calculation of diluted net income per common share unlessin periods that the average price of our common stock, as calculated in accordance with the terms of the indenture governing the 2021 Convertible Notes, due 2021, exceeds the conversion price of $9.33 per share. We have the option to pay cash, issue shares of common stock, or any combination thereof for the aggregate amount due upon conversion of the 2021 Convertible Notes due 2021 as further described in Note 6 above.6. If converted, we

NEWPARK RESOURCES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


currently intend to settle the principal amount of the notes in cash and as a result, only the amounts payable in excess of the principal amount of the notes, if any, are assumed to be settled with shares of common stock for purposes of computing diluted net income.

income per share.
Note 1112 — Stock BasedStock-Based Compensation and Other Benefit Plans
The following describes stockholder approved plans utilized by the Companyus for the issuance of stock basedstock-based awards.
2014 Non-Employee Directors’ Restricted Stock Plan
In May 2014, our stockholders approved the 2014 Non-Employee Directors’ Restricted Stock Plan (the “2014(“2014 Director Plan”) which authorizes grants of restricted stock to non-employee directors based on a pre-determined dollar amount on the date of each annual meeting of stockholders. The pre-determined dollar amount for determining the number of restricted shares granted is subject to change by the Board of Directors or its committee but iswas initially set at $150,000 for each non-employee director, except for the Chairman of the Board who will receive an annual grant of restricted shares equal to $170,000. Each restricted share granted to a non-employee director vests in full on the earlier of the day prior to the next annual meeting of stockholders following the grant date or the first anniversary of the grant. During 2016,2019, non-employee directors received shares of restricted stock totaling 212,961104,900 shares at a weighted average grant-date fair value on the date of grant of $4.32$7.34 per share.
The maximum number of shares of common stock issuable under the 2014 Director Plan is 1,000,000 leaving 602,972313,780 shares available for grant as of December 31, 2016.
NEWPARK RESOURCES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


2019.
2015 Employee Equity Incentive Plan
In May 2015, our stockholders approved the 2015 Employee Equity Incentive Plan (“2015 Plan”), pursuant to which the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors (“Compensation Committee”) may grant to key employees, including executive officers and other corporate and divisional officers,employees, a variety of forms of equity-based compensation, including options to purchase shares of common stock, shares of restricted common stock, restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights, other stock-based awards, and performance-based awards. In May 2016, ourOur stockholders subsequently approved an amendmentamendments to the 2015 Plan which increased the number of shares authorized for issuance underto 12,300,000 shares and removed the Plan from 6,000,000 to 7,800,000 shares. Under the 2015 Plan, as amended, grants of stock options and stock appreciation rights will reduce the number of available shares on a 1.00 to 1.00 basis, while full value awards will reduce the number of available shares on a 1.78 to 1.00 basis.fungible share counting provision. At December 31, 2016, 650,9512019, 3,381,983 shares remained available for award under the 2015 Plan.
PriorIn June 2017, our Board of Directors approved the Long-Term Cash Incentive Plan (“Cash Plan”), a sub-plan to approval of the 2015 Plan, equity-based compensation was provided pursuant to which the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (“2006 Plan”). No additional grants of equity-based compensationCompensation Committee may be granted under the 2006 Plan following approval of the 2015 Plan, however, unexpired optionsgrant time-based cash awards or performance-based cash awards to key employees, including executive officers and other awards previously granted continue in effect in accordance with their terms until they vestcorporate and divisional employees, to provide an opportunity for employees to receive a cash payment upon either completion of a service period or are otherwise exercised or expire.achievement of predetermined performance criteria at the end of a performance period.
TheDuring 2018, the Compensation Committee approvesmodified certain outstanding stock-based and other incentive awards in connection with the grantingretirement of allour former Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Chief Administrative Officer. As a result of these modifications, we recognized a charge of $1.5 million in the third quarter of 2018. During 2019, the Compensation Committee modified our retirement policy applicable to cash and equity awards granted to include our Chief Executive Officer and those officers who report to our Chief Executive Officer, who were previously excluded from the retirement policy. In addition, the Compensation Committee also modified the retirement policy for certain vested stock based compensationoptions that remain outstanding to employees, utilizing sharesextend the exercise period available underfollowing the 2015 Plan,qualifying retirement of eligible employees. As a result of these modifications, we recognized a charge of $4.0 million in the first quarter of 2019. This charge primarily reflects the acceleration of expense, as amended. well as the incremental value associated with modifications to extend the exercise period of outstanding options, for previously-granted awards for retirement eligible executive officers.
Activity under each of these programs is described below.
Stock Options & Cash-Settled Stock Appreciation Rights
Stock options granted by the Compensation Committee are granted with a three year vesting period and a term of ten years. During 2016, 1,242,856There have been 0 options were granted with an exercise price of each stock option granted equal to the fair market value on the date of grant.since 2016.

NEWPARK RESOURCES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


The following table summarizes activity for our outstanding stock options for the year ended December 31, 2016:2019:
Stock OptionsShares Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price
 Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life (Years)
 Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
(In thousands)
Outstanding at beginning of period3,311,726
 $7.13
    
Granted
 
    
Exercised(334,395) 3.93
    
Expired or canceled(135,272) 9.98
    
Outstanding at end of period2,842,059
 $7.37
 3.89 $2,177
        
Vested or expected to vest at end of period2,842,059
 $7.37
 3.89 $2,177
Options exercisable at end of period2,842,059
 $7.37
 3.89 $2,177
 Shares Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price
 Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life (Years)
 Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at beginning of period3,887,833
 $7.96
    
Granted1,242,856
 4.32
    
Exercised(125,017) 5.80
    
Expired or canceled(320,833) 8.43
    
Outstanding at end of period4,684,839
 $7.02
 6.14 $7,130,887
        
Vested or expected to vest at end of period4,592,882
 $7.06
 6.08 $6,878,173
Options exercisable at end of period2,910,115
 $7.67
 4.40 $3,235,311
We estimated the fair value of options granted on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, with the following weighted average assumptions:
 Year Ended December 31,
 2016 2015 2014
Risk-free interest rate1.38% 1.57% 1.53%
Expected life of the option in years5.22
 5.22
 5.22
Expected volatility50.5% 47.3% 48.6%
Dividend yield% % %
The risk-free interest rate is based on the implied yield on a U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issue with a remaining term equal to the expected term of the option. The expected life of the option is based on observed historical patterns. The expected volatility is based on historical volatility of the price of our common stock. The dividend yield is based on the projected annual dividend payment per share divided by the stock price at the date of grant, which is zero because we have not paid dividends for several years and do not expect to pay dividends in the foreseeable future.
NEWPARK RESOURCES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


The following table summarizes information about the weighted-average exercise price and the weighted-average grant date fair value of stock options granted:
 Year Ended December 31,
 2016 2015 2014
Weighted-average exercise price of the stock on the date of grant$4.32
 $9.00
 $11.20
Weighted-average grant date fair value on the date of grant$1.97
 $3.91
 $4.97
All stock options granted for 2016, 2015 and 2014 reflected an exercise price equal to the market value of the stock on the date of grant.
The total intrinsic value of options exercised was $0.1$1.6 million, $0.3$2.3 million, and $3.2$1.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014,2017, while cash from option exercises totaled $0.7$1.3 million, $0.6$3.9 million, and $3.4$2.6 million, respectively.
The following table summarizes activity for outstanding cash-settled stock appreciation rights for the year-ended December 31, 2016:
Rights
Outstanding at beginning of period103,133
Exercised
Expired or cancelled(33,633)
Outstanding at end of period69,500
Exercisable at end of period69,500
During 2016, there were no additional grants of cash-settled stock appreciation rights. All remaining cash-settled stock appreciation rights have a June 2018 expiration date, and if exercised, will ultimately be settled in cash for the difference between the market value of our outstanding shares at the date of exercise, and $7.89. As such, the projected cash settlement is adjusted each period based on the ending fair market value of the underlying stock. At December 31, 2016, the fair market value of each cash-settled stock appreciation right was $1.71, resulting in a liability of $0.1 million.
Total compensation cost recognized for stock options and cash-settled stock appreciation rights during the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 20142017 was $2.3$1.3 million, $2.6$1.5 million and $2.6$1.7 million, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014,2017, we recognized tax benefits resulting from the exercise of stock options totaling $0.1$0.3 million, $0.1$0.5 million and $1.0$0.3 million, , respectively.
Performance-Based Restricted Stock Units
Performance-basedIn 2016, performance-based restricted stock units were awarded to executive officers and willwere to be settled in shares of common stock based on the relative ranking of our total shareholder return (“TSR”) as compared to the TSR of our designated peer group over a three yearthree-year period. The ending TSR price is equal to the average closing price of our shares over the last 30-calendar days of the performance period as set forth in the following table:
 Year Ended December 31,
 2016 2015 2014
Number of performance-based restricted stock units issued, at target230,790
 136,881
 110,497
Range of payout of shares for each executive0% - 150%
 0% - 150%
 0% - 150%
Performance period begin dateJune 1, 2016
 June 1, 2015
 June 1, 2014
Performance period end dateMay 31, 2019
 May 31, 2018
 May 31, 2017
Estimated fair value at date of grant$5.18
 $10.06
 $12.55
NEWPARK RESOURCES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


We estimated the fair value of eachperiod. There have been 0 performance-based restricted stock unit at the date of grant using the Monte Carlo valuation model, with the following weighted average assumptions:units granted since 2016.
 Year Ended December 31,
 2016 2015 2014
Risk-free interest rate0.95% 1.02% 0.81%
Average closing price(1)
$4.69
 $8.96
 $11.28
Expected volatility46.9% 38.4% 44.5%
Dividend yield% % %
(1)Average closing price of our shares over the 30-calendar days ending May 16, 2016, May 19, 2015 and May 16, 2014, respectively.
The following table summarizes activity for outstanding performance-based restricted stock units for the year-ended December 31, 2016:2019:
Nonvested Performance-Based Restricted Stock UnitsShares Weighted-Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Outstanding at beginning of period230,790
 $5.18
Granted
 
Vested(230,790) 5.18
Forfeited
 
Outstanding at the end of period
 $
Nonvested Performance-Based Restricted Stock UnitsShares Weighted-Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Outstanding at beginning of period335,329
 $11.69
Granted230,790
 5.18
Vested(58,072) 13.11
Forfeited(60,863) 12.51
Outstanding at the end of period447,184
 $8.06

Total compensation cost recognized for performance-based restricted stock units was $1.0$0.1 million, $1.1$0.8 million and $0.5$1.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 20142017 respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2016,2019, the total fair value of performance-based restricted stock units vested was $0.4$2.4 million.
Restricted Stock Awards and Units
Time-vested restricted stock awards and restricted stock units are periodically granted to key employees, including grants for employment inducements, as well as to members of our Board of Directors. Employee awards provide for vesting periods ranging from three to four years. Non-employee director grants vest in full on the earlier of the day prior to the next annual meeting of stockholders following the grant date or the first anniversary of the grant. Upon vesting of these grants, shares are issued to award recipients.

NEWPARK RESOURCES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


The following tables summarize the activity for our outstanding time-vested restricted stock awards and restricted stock units 2016.for the year ended December 31, 2019:
Nonvested Restricted Stock Awards (Time-Vesting)Shares Weighted-Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Shares Weighted-Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Nonvested at January 1, 2016881,345
 $11.00
Nonvested at January 1, 2019180,578
 $9.56
Granted262,961
 4.50
104,900
 7.34
Vested(449,342) 10.50
(105,578) 10.49
Forfeited(99,429) 11.30

 
Nonvested at December 31, 2016595,535
 $8.45
Nonvested at December 31, 2019179,900
 $7.72
Nonvested Restricted Stock Units (Time-Vesting)Shares Weighted-Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Nonvested at January 1, 20191,797,538
 $8.33
Granted1,351,916
 7.24
Vested(903,254) 6.97
Forfeited(153,031) 8.06
Nonvested at December 31, 20192,093,169
 $8.24
Nonvested Restricted Stock Units (Time-Vesting)Shares Weighted-Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Nonvested at January 1, 20161,133,543
 $9.11
Granted1,534,994
 4.36
Vested(332,043) 9.30
Forfeited(153,465) 8.04
Nonvested at December 31, 20162,183,029
 $5.82
NEWPARK RESOURCES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)



Total compensation cost recognized for restricted stock awards and restricted stock units was $8.6$9.8 million, $10.1$7.8 million and $8.6$8.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014,2017, respectively. Total unrecognized compensation cost at December 31, 20162019 related to restricted stock awards and restricted stock units iswas approximately $10.9$10.4 million which is expected to be recognized over the next 1.82.2 years. During the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014,2017, the total fair value of shares vested was $3.9$7.2 million, $8.1$11.6 million and $9.0$10.4 million, respectively.
For 2016, 2015the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2014,2017, we recognized tax benefits resulting from the vesting of restricted stock awards and units totaling $1.5of $1.9 million, $2.0$2.8 million and $2.8$1.9 million, respectively.
Cash-Based Awards
The Compensation Committee also approved the issuance of cash-based awards during 2019, 2018 and 2017. The 2019 awards included a target amount of $2.3 million of performance-based cash awards. The 2018 awards included $1.3 million of time-based cash awards and a target amount of $1.3 million of performance-based cash awards. The 2017 awards included $5.3 million of time-based cash awards and a target amount of $1.3 million of performance-based cash awards. The time-based cash awards were granted to executive officers and other key employees and primarily vest in equal installments over a three-year period.
The performance-based cash awards were granted to executive officers and are to be paid based on the relative ranking of our TSR as compared to the TSR of our designated peer group. The performance period began June 1, 2019 and ends May 31, 2022 for the 2019 awards, began June 1, 2018 and ends May 31, 2021 for the 2018 awards, and began June 1, 2017 and ends May 31, 2020 for the 2017 awards. The ending TSR price is equal to the average closing price of our shares over the last 30-calendar days of the performance period. The cash payout for each executive ranges from 0% to 200% of target for the 2019 awards, and 0% to 150% of target for the 2018 and 2017 awards.
The performance-based cash awards are accrued as a liability award over the performance period based on the estimated fair value. The fair value of the performance-based cash awards is remeasured each period using a Monte-Carlo valuation model with changes in fair value recognized in the consolidated statement of operations. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the total liability for cash-based awards was $4.1 million and $3.0 million, respectively.
Defined Contribution Plan
Substantially all of our U.S. employees are covered by a defined contribution plan (“401(k) Plan”). Employees may voluntarily contribute up to 50% of compensation, as defined in the 401(k) Plan. Participants’ contributions, up to 3% of compensation, are matched 100% by us, and the participants’ contributions, from 3% to 6% of compensation, are matched 50%

NEWPARK RESOURCES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


by us. Under the 401(k) Plan, our cash contributions were $0.9$4.3 million, $3.2$3.9 million and $3.6$1.4 million in 2016, 2015for 2019, 2018 and 2014,2017, respectively. In connection with the additional cost reduction programs implemented in response to the continued decline in activity in early 2016, we temporarily eliminated our 401(k) matching contribution beginning in March 2016.
2016, and this temporary elimination was lifted in the second quarter of 2017.
Note 1213 — Segment and Related Information
Our Company consists of twoWe operate our business through 2 reportable segments, which offer different products and services to a relatively homogenous customer base. The reportable segments include:segments: Fluids Systems and Mats and Integrated Services. All intercompany revenues and related profits have been eliminated.
Fluids Systems — Our Fluids Systems businesssegment provides customized drilling, completion, and stimulation fluids products and technical servicessolutions to E&P customers primarily in the North America, EMEA, Latin America, and Europe, the Middle East and Africa (“EMEA”), as well as certain countries in Asia Pacific regions.and Latin America. We offer customized solutions for highly technical drilling projects involving complex subsurface conditions, such as horizontal, directional, geologically deep or drilling in deep water drilling.water. These projects require increasedhigh levels of monitoring and critical engineeringtechnical support of the fluids system during the drilling process.
We also have industrial mineral grinding operations for barite, a critical raw material in drilling fluids products, which serve to support our activity in the North American drilling fluids market. We use the resulting products in our drilling fluids business, and also sell them to third party users, including other drilling fluids companies. We also sell a variety of other minerals, principally to third party industrial (non-oil and natural gas) markets.
Mats and Integrated Services Our Mats and Integrated Services segment manufacturesprovides composite mat rentals utilized for temporary worksite access, along with related site construction and services to customers in various markets including E&P, electrical transmission & distribution, pipeline, solar, petrochemical, and construction industries across North America and Europe. We also sell composite mats to customers around the world. We manufacture our DURA-BASE® Advanced Composite Mats for use in our rental operations as well as for third partythird-party sales. Our matsmatting systems provide environmental protection and ensure all-weather access to sites with unstable soil conditions. We provide mat rentals to customers in the E&P, electrical transmission & distribution, pipeline, solar, petrochemical and construction industries across the U.S., Canada and United Kingdom. We also offer locationThe November 2017 acquisition of WSG expanded our range of site construction and related services towe offer our customers primarily inacross the U.S. Gulf Coast region. In addition, we sellto include a variety of complementary services to our composite mats to customers outside of the U.S.matting systems, including access road construction, site planning and to domestic customers outside of the oilpreparation, environmental protection, fluids and gas exploration market.spill containment, erosion control, and site restoration services.

NEWPARK RESOURCES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)




Summarized financial information concerning our reportable segments is shown in the following tables:
 Year Ended December 31,
(In thousands)2019 2018 2017
      
Revenues     
Fluids systems$620,317
 $715,813
 $615,803
Mats and integrated services199,802
 230,735
 131,960
Total revenues$820,119
 $946,548
 $747,763
      
Depreciation and amortization     
Fluids systems$21,202
 $20,922
 $21,566
Mats and integrated Services21,763
 21,321
 14,991
Corporate office4,179
 3,656
 3,200
Total depreciation and amortization$47,144
 $45,899
 $39,757
      
Operating income (loss)     
Fluids systems$3,814
 $40,337
 $27,580
Mats and integrated services47,466
 60,604
 40,491
Corporate office(40,885) (37,383) (36,635)
Total operating income (loss)$10,395
 $63,558
 $31,436
      
Segment assets     
Fluids systems$593,758
 $617,615
 $611,455
Mats and integrated services265,786
 270,248
 260,931
Corporate office40,535
 27,991
 30,330
Total segment assets$900,079
 $915,854
 $902,716
      
Capital expenditures     
Fluids Systems$18,416
 $15,356
 $17,589
Mats and Integrated Services23,535
 27,043
 11,956
Corporate office2,855
 2,742
 1,826
Total capital expenditures$44,806
 $45,141
 $31,371

 Year Ended December 31,
(In thousands)2016 2015 2014
      
Revenues     
Fluids systems$395,461
 $581,136
 $965,049
Mats and integrated services76,035
 95,729
 153,367
Total revenues$471,496
 $676,865
 $1,118,416
      
Depreciation and amortization     
Fluids systems$20,746
 $22,108
 $22,934
Mats and integrated Services14,227
 18,869
 15,507
Corporate office2,982
 2,940
 2,734
Total depreciation and amortization$37,955
 $43,917
 $41,175
      
Operating income (loss)     
Fluids systems$(43,631) $(86,770) $95,600
Mats and integrated services14,741
 24,949
 70,526
Corporate office(28,323) (37,278) (35,530)
Operating income (loss)$(57,213) $(99,099) $130,596
      
Segment Assets     
Fluids Systems$522,488
 $549,827
 $778,148
Mats and Integrated Services164,515
 172,415
 175,318
Corporate111,180
 126,651
 54,206
Total Assets$798,183
 $848,893
 $1,007,672
      
Capital Expenditures     
Fluids Systems$32,310
 $40,533
 $36,626
Mats and Integrated Services4,637
 27,456
 64,101
Corporate1,493
 1,415
 5,215
Total Capital Expenditures$38,440
 $69,404
 $105,942
The Consolidated StatementsFluids Systems operating income for 2019 includes an $11.4 million non-cash impairment of Cash Flows include $0.9goodwill and a total of $7.3 million in depreciationof charges associated with facility closures and amortization expenserelated exit costs, inventory write-downs, and capital expenditures of $1.0 million for 2014 related toseverance costs, as well as the Environmental Services business sold in 2014 that are classified as discontinued operations.
In response to the significant declines in industry activity in North America, we implemented cost reduction programs in 2015 including workforce reductions, reduced discretionary spending, and temporary salary freezes for substantially all employees, including executive officers. In September 2015, we also implemented a voluntary early retirement program with certain eligible employees in the United States. As a result of the further declines in activity in the first half of 2016, we implemented further cost reduction actions including additional workforce reductions and beginning in March 2016, a temporary salary reduction for a significant number of North American employees, including executive officers, suspensionmodification of the Company’s matching contribution toretirement policy. Corporate office operating loss for 2019 includes $3.4 million in charges associated with the U.S. defined contribution plan as well as a reduction in cash compensation paid to our Board of Directors in order to further align our cost structure to activity levels.February 2019 retirement policy modification.

NEWPARK RESOURCES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)




As part of these cost reduction programs, we reduced our North American employee base by 626 (approximately 48%) fromThe following table presents further disaggregated revenues for the first quarter 2015 through the third quarter of 2016, including reductions of 436 employees in 2015 and 190 employees in the first nine months of 2016. As a result of these termination programs, we recognized charges for employee termination costs as shown in the table below:
 Year Ended December 31,
(In thousands)2016 2015
Cost of revenues$3,647
 $5,664
Selling, general and administrative expenses925
 2,499
Total employee termination costs$4,572
 $8,163
    
Fluids systems$4,125
 $7,218
Mats and integrated services285
 717
Corporate office162
 228
Total employee termination costs$4,572
 $8,163
Accrued employee termination costs at December 31, 2016 and 2015 were $0.3 million and $3.3 million, respectively.
Our 2016 and 2015 operating losses include net charges of $14.8 million and $80.5 million, respectively, resulting from the reduction in value of certain assets, the wind-down of our operations in Uruguay and the resolution of certain wage and hour litigation claims. The Fluids Systems segment operating results included $15.5 million and $75.5 million of these charges in 2016 and 2015, respectively. The remaining $0.7 million benefit and $5.0 million charge was included in Corporate Office expenses in 2016 and 2015, respectively, related to the resolution of certain wage and hour litigation claims.segment:
 Year Ended December 31,
(In thousands)2019 2018 2017
United States$395,618
 $410,410
 $341,075
Canada31,635
 66,416
 54,322
Total North America427,253
 476,826
 395,397
      
EMEA172,263
 192,537
 179,360
Asia Pacific15,273
 17,733
 4,081
Latin America5,528
 28,717
 36,965
Total International193,064
 238,987
 220,406
      
Total Fluids Systems revenues$620,317
 $715,813
 $615,803

The $15.5 million of Fluids Systems charges in 2016 includes $6.9 million of non-cash impairments in the Asia Pacific region resulting from the continuing unfavorable industry market conditions and the deteriorating outlookfollowing table presents further disaggregated revenues for the region, $4.1 million of charges for the reduction in carrying values of certain inventory, primarily resulting from lower of cost or market adjustmentsMats and $4.5 million of charges in the Latin America region associated with the wind-down of our operations in Uruguay, including $0.5 million to write-down property, plant and equipment. The $6.9 million of impairments in the Asia Pacific region includes a $3.8 million charge to write-down property, plant and equipment to its estimated fair value and a $3.1 million charge to fully impair the customer related intangible assets in the region.Integrated Services segment:
 Year Ended December 31,
(In thousands)2019 2018 2017
Service revenues$73,130
 $93,056
 $34,943
Rental revenues70,207
 81,784
 61,124
Product sales revenues56,465
 55,895
 35,893
Total Mats and Integrated Services revenues$199,802
 $230,735
 $131,960

The $75.5 million of Fluids Systems charges in 2015Mats and Integrated Services segment includes $70.7 million of non-cash charges for the impairment of goodwill, following our November 1, 2015 annual evaluation, a $2.6 million non-cash impairment of assets, following our decision to exit a facility, and a $2.2 million charge to reduce the carrying value of diesel-based drilling fluid inventory, resulting from lower of cost or market adjustments.
In 2016, a total of $6.7 million of these charges are reported in impairments and other charges with the remaining $8.1 million reported in cost of revenues including the $4.1 million of charges for the write-down of inventory and $4.0 millionimpact of the Uruguay exit costs. In 2015, a total of $78.3 million of these charges are reportedWSG acquisition completed in impairments and other charges with the remaining $2.2 million of charges for the write-down of inventory being reported in cost of revenues.November 2017.
As described in Note 1, we revised our estimated useful lives and end of life residual values for composite mats included in our rental fleet as of January 1, 2016 resulting in a decrease in depreciation expense of approximately $6.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2016.


NEWPARK RESOURCES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)




The following table sets forth geographic information for all of our operations. Revenues by geographic location are determined based on the operating location from which services are rendered or products are sold. Long-lived assets include property, plant and equipment and other long-term assets based on the country in which the assets are located.
 Year Ended December 31,
(In thousands)2019 2018 2017
Revenues     
United States$578,698
 $626,656
 $460,872
Canada37,496
 67,374
 55,600
Algeria60,010
 81,508
 87,975
All Other EMEA123,114
 124,510
 102,247
Asia Pacific15,273
 17,733
 4,081
Latin America5,528
 28,767
 36,988
Total revenues$820,119
 $946,548
 $747,763
      
Long-lived assets     
United States$365,185
 $338,475
 $337,190
Canada2,129
 3,284
 3,993
EMEA46,447
 41,774
 46,269
Asia Pacific2,862
 2,898
 3,120
Latin America1,047
 1,595
 2,354
Total long-lived assets$417,670
 $388,026
 $392,926
 Year Ended December 31,
(In thousands)2016 2015 2014
      
Revenue     
United States$214,026
 $384,147
 $748,845
Canada34,176
 52,851
 79,516
Algeria80,936
 65,272
 58,417
All Other EMEA96,654
 109,252
 118,827
Latin America41,035
 47,240
 85,244
Asia Pacific4,669
 18,103
 27,567
Total Revenue$471,496
 $676,865
 $1,118,416
      
Long-Lived Assets     
United States$274,746
 $275,109
 $294,762
Canada3,922
 552
 10,044
EMEA48,047
 50,759
 55,560
Latin America4,842
 4,543
 6,635
Asia Pacific1,939
 9,731
 25,991
Total Long-Lived Assets$333,496
 $340,694
 $392,992

For 2016, revenue from Sonatrach, our primary customer in Algeria, was approximately 14% of consolidated revenues. For 20152019, 2018 and 2014,2017, no single customer accounted for more than 10% of our consolidated revenues.

Note 1314 — Supplemental Cash Flow and Other Information
Supplemental disclosures to the statements of cash flows are presented below:
(in thousands)2019 2018 2017
Cash paid (received) for:     
Income taxes (net of refunds)$12,165
 $15,627
 $(20,396)
Interest$8,718
 $8,741
 $8,718

Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash in the consolidated statements of cash flows consisted of the following:
(in thousands)2019 2018 2017
Cash and cash equivalents$48,672
 $56,118
 $56,352
Restricted cash (included in other current assets)8,191
 8,148
 9,108
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash$56,863
 $64,266
 $65,460

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities at December 31, 2016, 2015,2019, 2018, and 2014,2017, included accruals for capital expenditures of $2.0$1.8 million, $3.9$4.2 million, and $1.2$2.7 million, respectively.
Accrued liabilities at December 31, 20162019 and 2015 were $31.2 million and $45.8 million, respectively. The balance at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 20152018 included $11.9 million and $15.1 million, respectively,accruals for employee incentives and other compensation related expenses.expenses of $21.6 million and $28.9 million, respectively.
Impairments
Note 15 — Discontinued Operations
Following the sale of our Environmental Services business in March 2014, the buyer asserted that we had breached certain representations and other non-cash chargeswarranties contained in the consolidated statementssale agreement. The disputed matter went to trial in 2017 and following commencement of cash flows included the following:trial, we reached a settlement agreement with the buyer to effectively reduce the sales price by $22.0 million. The impact of this settlement resulted in a charge to discontinued operations of $22.0 million ($17.4 million net of tax) in 2017 to reduce the previously recognized gain from the sale of the Environmental Services business. See further discussion of the buyer’s claims and related litigation in Note 16.

 Year Ended December 31,
(In thousands)2016 2015
Goodwill and other intangible asset impairments$3,104
 $70,720
Property, plant and equipment impairments4,286
 2,625
Inventory write-downs4,075
 2,163
Write-off of debt issuance costs on termination of Credit Agreement1,058
 
Impairments and other non-cash charges in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows$12,523
 $75,508

NEWPARK RESOURCES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)



Note 14 — Discontinued Operations
In March of 2014 we completed the sale of the Environmental Services business for $100 million in cash, subject to adjustment based on actual working capital conveyed at closing. Cash proceeds from the sale were $89.8 million in 2014, net of transaction related expenses, including the adjustment related to final working capital conveyed at closing. The agreement significantly limits our post-closing environmental obligations, including those related to the waste transfer and disposal facilities. In addition, $8.0 million of the sales price was withheld in escrow associated with transaction representations, warranties and indemnities, with $4.0 million scheduled to be released at each of the nine-month and 18-month anniversary of the closing. In December 2014, the buyer made certain claims for indemnification under the terms of the agreement, which defers the release of the escrow funds until such claims are resolved. Further discussion of the buyer’s claims and related litigation is contained in Note 15. As a result of the sale transaction, we recorded a gain on the disposal of the business of $34.0 million ($22.1 million after-tax) in the first quarter of 2014. The results of operations for this business have been classified as discontinued operations for all periods presented.
Summarized results of operations from discontinued operations are as follows:
(In thousands)2017
Loss from disposal of discontinued operations before income taxes$21,983
Loss from disposal of discontinued operations, net of tax$17,367
(In thousands)2014
Revenues$11,744
Income from discontinued operations before income taxes1,770
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax1,152
Gain from disposal of discontinued operations before income taxes33,974
Gain from disposal of discontinued operations, net of tax22,117

Note 1516 — Commitments and Contingencies
In the ordinary course of conducting our business, we become involved in litigation and other claims from private party actions, as well as judicial and administrative proceedings involving governmental authorities at the federal, state, and local levels. While the outcome of litigation or other proceedings against us cannot be predicted with certainty, management does not expect that any loss resulting from such litigation or other proceedings, in excess of any amounts accrued or covered by insurance, will have a material adverse impact on our consolidated financial statements.
WageKenedy, Texas Drilling Fluids Facility Fire
In July 2018, a fire occurred at our Kenedy, Texas drilling fluids facility, destroying the distribution warehouse, including inventory and Hour Litigation
surrounding equipment. In addition, nearby residences and businesses were evacuated as part of the response to the fire. In order to avoid any customer service disruptions, we implemented contingency plans to supply products from alternate facilities in the area and region. During the secondthird quarter of 2014, a lawsuit was filed by Jesse Davida, a former employee, in Federal Court in Texas against Newpark Drilling Fluids LLC, alleging violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”). The plaintiff sought2018 and subsequently, we have received petitions seeking payment for alleged bodily injuries, property damage, and punitive damages and penalties for our alleged failureclaimed to properly classify our field service employees as “non-exempt” under the FLSA and pay them on an hourly basis (including overtime). The Court conditionally certified a class of plaintiffs as those working as fluid service technicians for Newpark Drilling Fluids for the prior three years. A second case was filed by Josh Christensen in the fourth quarter of 2014 in Federal Court in Texas alleging that individuals treated as independent contractors should have been classifiedincurred as employees and, as such, were entitled to assert claims for alleged violations of the FLSA (similar to the claims asserted in the Davida matter). Five additional plaintiffs joined this litigation after it was filed. In March of 2015, the Court denied the plaintiffs’ motion for conditional class certification. Counsel for the plaintiffs did not appeal that ruling and subsequently filed individual cases for each of the original opt-in plaintiffs plus two new plaintiffs, leaving a total of eight independent contractor cases.
In the fourth quarter of 2015, the same counsel representing the plaintiff’s in the Davida and Christiansen-related cases filed two additional individual FLSA cases on behalf of former fluid service technician employees. These cases are similar in nature to the Davida case discussed above.
Beginning in November 2015, we engaged in settlement discussions with counsel for the plaintiffs in the pending wage and hour litigation cases described above. Following mediation in January 2016, the parties executed a settlement agreement in April 2016 to resolve all of the pending matters, subject to a number of conditions, including approval by the Court in the Davida case, and the dismissal of the other FLSA cases (Christiansen-related lawsuits and individual FLSA cases). As a result of the then ongoing settlement negotiations,fire and the subsequent efforts we undertook to remediate any potential smoke damage. As of December 31, 2019, there are open claims with 19 plaintiffs seeking a total of approximately $1.5 million. While no trial date has been set for the matter at this time, we have been advised by our insurer that these claims are insured under our general liability insurance program. While this event and related claims are covered by our property, business interruption, and general liability insurance programs, these programs contain self-insured retentions, which remain our financial obligations.
During 2018, we incurred fire-related costs of $4.8 million, which included $1.9 million for inventory and property, plant and equipment, $2.1 million in property-related cleanup and other costs, and $0.8 million relating to our self-insured retention for third-party claims. Based on the provisions of our insurance policies and initial insurance claims filed, we estimated $4.0 million in expected insurance recoveries and recognized a $5.0charge of $0.8 million chargein other operating (income) loss, net, in the fourththird quarter of 20152018. The insurance receivable balance included in other receivables was $0.3 million and $0.6 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. As of December 31, 2019, the claims related to the resolution of these wagefire under our property, business interruption, and hour litigation claims. The settlement agreement was approved by the Davida Court on August 19, 2016. Approximately 569 current and former fluid service technician employees eligible for the settlement were notified of the pending resolution beginning on August 26, 2016 and given an opportunity to participate in the settlement. The amount paid to any eligible individual varied based on a formula that takes into account the number of workweeks and salary for the individual during the time period covered by the settlement. Any eligible individual that elected to participate in the settlement released all wage and hour claims against us.
NEWPARK RESOURCES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


The deadline for submitting claims or opting out was October 25, 2016 with 379 individuals filing claims and no individuals opting out. The percentage of current or former fluid service technicians that elected to participate in the settlement represented approximately 67% of the individuals receiving notice. Individuals that didgeneral liability insurance programs have not participate in the settlement may retain the right to file an individual lawsuit against us, subject to any defenses we may assert. As a result of the settlement agreement, we paid $4.5 million into a settlement fund in the second half of 2016. The settlement fund was administered by a third party who made payments to eligible individuals that elected to participate in accordance with a formula incorporated into the settlement agreement. In addition, under the terms of settlement agreement, settlement funds that remained after all payments were made to eligible individuals that elected to participate in the settlement were shared by the participating individuals and us. In the fourth quarter of 2016, we recognized a $0.7 million gain associated with the change in final settlement amount of these wage and hour litigation claims.been finalized.
Escrow Claims Related to Sale of Environmental Services Business
Under the terms of the March 2014 sale of theour previous Environmental Services business to Ecoserv, LLC (“Ecoserv”), $8$8.0 million of the sales price was withheld and placed in an escrow account to satisfy claims for possible breaches of representations and warranties contained in the purchase/sale agreement. For the amount withheld in escrow, $4.0 million was scheduled for release to Newpark at each of the nine-month and 18-month anniversary of the closing. In December 2014, we received a letter from counsel for Ecoserv asserting that we had breached certain representations and warranties contained in the purchase/sale agreement, including failing to disclose operational problems and service work performed on injectioninjection/disposal wells and increased barge rental costs. The letter indicated that Ecoserv expected the costsdamages associated with these claims to exceed the escrow amount. Following a further exchange of letters, inIn July of 2015 we filed a declaratory judgmentan action against Ecoserv in state district court in Harris County, Texas, seeking release of the escrow funds. Thereafter, Ecoserv filed a counterclaim seeking recovery in excess of the escrow funds based on the alleged breach of representations and warranties.covenants in the purchase/sale agreement. Ecoserv also allegesalleged that we committed fraud in connection with the saleMarch 2014 transaction. We believe there is no basisFollowing commencement of the trial in December 2017, we reached a settlement agreement with Ecoserv in the agreement or onfirst quarter of 2018, under which Ecoserv received $22.0 million in cash, effectively reducing the factsnet sales price of the Environmental Services business by such amount in exchange for dismissal of the pending claims in the lawsuit, and release of any future claims related to support the claims asserted by EcoservMarch 2014 transaction. As a result of the settlement, we recognized a charge to discontinued operations in the fourth quarter of 2017 for $22.0 million ($17.4 million net of tax) to reduce the previously recognized gain from the sale of the Environmental Services business. The reduction in sales price was funded in the first quarter of 2018 with a cash payment of $14.0 million and intend to vigorously defend our position while pursuing release of the entire $8.0 million that had been held in escrow. The litigation remains inescrow since the discovery processMarch 2014 transaction. In March 2018, the lawsuit was dismissed with mediation currently scheduled in March of 2017.
Leases
We lease various manufacturing facilities, warehouses, office space, machinery and equipment under operating leases with remaining terms ranging from oneprejudice. Litigation expenses related to ten years with various renewal options. Substantially all leases require payment of taxes, insurance and maintenance costs in addition to rental payments. Total rental expenses for all operating leasesthis matter were approximately $21.0 million, $22.6 million and $25.5 million in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
Future minimum payments under non-cancelable operating leases, with initial or remaining terms in excess of one year are included in the table below. Future minimum payments under capital leases are not significant.
(In thousands) 
2017$9,310
20186,128
20194,724
20203,805
20213,342
Thereafter9,780
 $37,089
corporate office expenses in operating income. 
Other
In conjunction with our insurance programs,We do not have any special purpose entities. At December 31, 2019, we had established$52.5 million in outstanding letters of credit, in favor of certain insurance companies in the amount of $3.0 million and $3.3 million at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. We also had $0.4 million and $0.4 million in guarantee obligations in connection with facility closureperformance bonds, and other performance bonds issuedguarantees for which certain of the letters of credit are collateralized by insurance companies outstanding as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. 
Other than$8.2 million in restricted cash. We also enter into normal short-term operating leases for office and warehouse space, as well as rolling stock and other

NEWPARK RESOURCES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


pieces of operating equipment, we do not have anyequipment. None of these off-balance sheet financing arrangements either had, or special purpose entities. As such, we are not materially exposedis expected to any financing, liquidity, market or credit risk that could arise if we had engaged in such financing arrangements.have, a material effect on our financial statements.
We are self-insured for health claims, subject to certain “stop loss” insurance policies. Claims in excess of $250,000 per incident are insured by third-party insurers. WeBased on historical experience, we had accrued liabilities of $0.8 million and $1.0 million for unpaid claims incurred based on historical experience at both December 31, 20162019 and 2015, respectively.2018. Substantially all of these estimated claims are expected to be paid within six months of their occurrence.
NEWPARK RESOURCES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


We In addition, we are self-insured for certain workers’ compensation, auto, and general liability claims up to a certain policy limit. Claims in excess of $750,000 are insured by third-party reinsurers. At December 31, 2016 and 2015,Based on historical experience, we had accrued liabilities of $1.9 million and $2.5$2.2 million respectively, for the uninsured portion of claims.claims as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
We also maintain accrued liabilities for asset retirement obligations, which represent obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets that result from the normal operation of the long-lived asset. Our asset retirement obligations primarily relate to required expenditures associated with owned and leased facilities. Upon settlement of the liability, a gain or loss for any difference between the settlement amount and the liability recorded is recognized. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, weWe had accrued asset retirement obligations of $1.0$1.2 million and $0.8$1.1 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
Note 1617 — Supplemental Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)First
Quarter
 Second
Quarter
 Third
Quarter
 Fourth
Quarter
Fiscal Year 2019       
Revenues$211,473
 $216,412
 $202,763
 $189,471
Operating income (loss)5,679
 10,914
 6,288
 (12,486)
Income (loss) from continuing operations1,282
 4,306
 (1,441) (17,093)
   Net income (loss)1,282
 4,306
 (1,441) (17,093)
        
Income per common share - basic:       
   Income from continuing operations$0.01
 $0.05
 $(0.02) $(0.19)
   Net income$0.01
 $0.05
 $(0.02) $(0.19)
        
Income per common share - diluted:       
   Income from continuing operations$0.01
 $0.05
 $(0.02) $(0.19)
   Net income$0.01
 $0.05
 $(0.02) $(0.19)
        
Fiscal Year 2018       
Revenues$227,293
 $236,262
 $235,329
 $247,664
Operating income13,838
 19,143
 10,054
 20,523
Income from continuing operations7,222
 10,846
 3,644
 10,569
   Net income7,222
 10,846
 3,644
 10,569
        
Income per common share - basic:       
   Income from continuing operations$0.08
 $0.12
 $0.04
 $0.12
   Net income$0.08
 $0.12
 $0.04
 $0.12
        
Income per common share - diluted:       
   Income from continuing operations$0.08
 $0.12
 $0.04
 $0.11
   Net income$0.08
 $0.12
 $0.04
 $0.11

(In thousands, except per share amounts)First
Quarter
 Second
Quarter
 Third
Quarter
 Fourth
Quarter
Fiscal Year 2016       
Revenues$114,544
 $115,315
 $104,554
 $137,083
Operating loss(18,825) (15,135) (15,055) (8,198)
Net loss(13,300) (13,904) (13,451) (57)
        
Net loss per common share       
Basic$(0.16) $(0.17) $(0.16) $
Diluted$(0.16) $(0.17) $(0.16) $
        
Fiscal Year 2015       
Revenues$208,464
 $163,644
 $154,170
 $150,587
Operating income (loss)6,128
 (1,682) (9,263) (94,282)
Net income (loss)993
 (4,254) (4,471) (83,096)
        
Net income (loss) per common share       
Basic$0.01
 $(0.05) $(0.05) $(1.00)
Diluted$0.01
 $(0.05) $(0.05) $(1.00)
FourthOperating income for the first quarter 2016 operating lossof 2019 includes a $2.6$4.0 million non-cash charge to reducein charges associated with the carrying value of drilling fluids inventory in our Asia Pacific region. Fourth quarter 2016February 2019 retirement policy modification and third quarter 2016 operating loss includes charges of $2.0$0.5 million and $2.5 million, respectively, associated primarily with asset redeployment costs resulting from the exit of our Fluids Systems operations in Uruguay. Second quarter 2016 operating loss includes a total of $6.9 million of impairments and other charges related to our Asia Pacific region, including a $3.8 million non-cash impairment to write-down property, plant and equipment to its estimated fair value and a $3.1 million impairment of customer related intangible assets.
Fourth quarter 2015 operatingseverance costs. Operating loss includes a total of $80.5 million of charges for the reduction in valuefourth quarter of certain assets and the resolution of the wage and hour litigation claims. These charges include a $70.72019 includes an $11.4 million non-cash impairment of goodwill a $2.6 million non-cash impairment of assets following our decision to exit a facility, a $2.2 million charge to reduce the carrying value of diesel-based drilling fluid inventory, and a $5.0total of $6.7 million charge for the resolution of certain wagecharges associated with facility closures and hour litigation claims.related exit costs, inventory write-downs, and severance costs.





ITEM 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.
ITEM 9A. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures
Based on their evaluation (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures1934) as of the end of the period covered by this report, theannual report. Based on such evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company have concluded that the Company’sour disclosure controls and procedures arewere effective as of December 31, 2016.2019, the end of the period covered by this annual report.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting
There has been no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 20162019 that has materially affected, or isare reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
We are responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Securities and Exchange Act Rule 13(a)-15(f)13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f). Our internal control system over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted accounting principles.in the United States of America.
Internal control over financial reporting has inherent limitations and may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance, not absolute assurance with respect to the financial statement preparation and presentation. Further, because of changes in conditions, the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting may vary over time.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we have evaluated the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20162019 as required by the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 Rule 13a-15(c). In making itsour assessment, we have utilized the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in a report entitled “InternalInternal Control — Integrated Framework (2013).” We concluded that based on our evaluation, our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2016.2019.
The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20162019 has been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which is included herein.
 
/s/ Paul L. Howes             
Paul L. Howes
President and Chief Executive Officer
 
/s/ Gregg S. Piontek         
Gregg S. Piontek
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



Remediation of the 2018 Material Weakness
As disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2018 due to a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting. Specifically, we did not properly design and operate adequate monitoring control activities to identify material terms and conditions included in infrequent, material complex financing arrangements to ensure compliance with all material obligations. In 2019, we undertook remediation measures to design new controls to monitor activities with respect to infrequent and material complex financing arrangements, and implemented a compliance checklist to identify material terms and compliance requirements with respective due dates, and assigned responsible personnel to monitor compliance activities. We completed the testing and evaluation of the operating effectiveness of the new controls, and based on the results of the testing, the controls were determined to be designed and operating effectively as of March 31, 2019. Accordingly, our management concluded the previously reported material weakness was remediated as of March 31, 2019.




REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 
 
To the stockholders and the Board of Directors and Stockholders of 
Newpark Resources, Inc.
The Woodlands, Texas
Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Newpark Resources, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company"“Company”) as of December 31, 2016,2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Commission (COSO). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019, of the Company and our report dated February 21, 2020, expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements and included an explanatory paragraph regarding the Company’s adoption of a new accounting standard.
Basis for Opinion
The Company'sCompany’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying management’sManagement’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company'sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company'scompany’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company's principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company's board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company'scompany’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company'scompany’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of theits inherent limitations, of internal control over financial reporting including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be preventedprevent or detected on a timely basis.detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on the criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016, of the Company and our report dated February 24, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.


/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Houston, Texas
February 24, 201721, 2020





ITEM 9B. Other Information
Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement.None.
Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an Off-Balance Sheet Arrangement of a Registrant.
On February 21, 2017, the Company, and certain of its subsidiaries, as borrowers, entered into a First Amendment to Credit Agreement (the “First Amendment”) with Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, swing line lender and line of credit issuer and a group of lenders, including Bank of America, N.A.
The First Amendment amends certain provisions of the ABL Facility dated May 12, 2016 to, among other things:
(a) Amend certain provisions to allow a proposed inter-company transaction between  Dura-Base Nevada, Inc., a borrower under the ABL Facility (“Dura-Base”) and Terrafirma Roadways Limited (“Terrafirma”) pursuant to which (i) Dura-Base will sell to Terrafirma certain mats previously leased to Terrafirma and (ii) Terrafirma will deliver to Dura-Base its promissory note in payment for such mats.
(b) Include additional definitions and amend certain existing definitions and covenants to provide for the Convertible Notes due 2021 that were issued in December 2016.
(c) Allow the Company to request a reserve to be imposed in respect of its future repayment of the Convertible Notes due 2017, which if requested will be imposed by the administrative agent in the amount requested by the Company and be released upon the earlier of (i) the repurchase, repayment, refinance or other satisfaction of the Convertible Notes due 2017 and (ii) the Company’s deposit of cash and cash equivalents in an escrow account with the administrative agent in an amount sufficient to satisfy the Convertible Notes due 2017 in full at their maturity.  
In addition, pursuant to the First Amendment, the Company amended and restated certain disclosure schedules previously delivered in connection with the execution of the ABL Facility to include certain information that was not included in the original schedules. While the Company does not believe the failure to disclose such information on the original schedules constitutes a default or event of default under the ABL Facility, the required lenders under the ABL Facility did waive any possible default or event of default arising solely from the failure to include such information in the original disclosure schedules.
Certain of the lenders under the ABL Facility and their affiliates have in the past provided, and may from time to time in the future provide, commercial banking, financial advisory, investment banking and other services to the Company.
The foregoing description of the First Amendment is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the First Amendment, which is attached as Exhibit 10.66 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K and incorporated in this Item by reference.



PART III
ITEM 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Executive Officers and Directors
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the “Executive Officers” and “Election of Directors” sections of the definitive Proxy Statement relating to our 20172020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act
The information required by this Item, if applicable, is incorporated by reference to the “Section“Delinquent Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance”Reports” section of the definitive Proxy Statement relating to our 20172020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
Code of Conduct and Ethics
We have adopted a Code of Ethics for Senior Officers and Directors ("Code of Ethics"), and a Code of Business Ethics and Conduct (“Ethics Manual”) that applies to all officers and employees. The Code of Ethics and Ethics Manual are publicly available in the investor relations area of our website at www.newpark.com. This CodeAny amendments to, or waivers of, Ethics is incorporated in this report by reference.the Codes with respect to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer or principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions, will be disclosed on our website within four business days following the date of the amendment or waiver. Copies of our Code of Ethics may also be requested in print by writing to Newpark Resources, Inc., 9320 Lakeside Blvd., Suite 100, The Woodlands, Texas, 77381.

ITEM 11. Executive Compensation
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the “Executive Compensation” section of the definitive Proxy Statement relating to our 20172020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
 
ITEM 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the “Ownership of Common Stock” sectionand “Equity Compensation Plan Information” sections of the definitive Proxy Statement relating to our 20172020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
 
ITEM 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the “Related Person Transactions” and “Director Independence” sections of the definitive Proxy Statement relating to our 20172020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
 
ITEM 14. Principal AccountantAccounting Fees and Services
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the “Independent Auditor” section of the definitive Proxy Statement relating to our 20172020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.





PART IV
ITEM 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
(a)     List of documents filed as part of this reportAnnual Report or incorporated herein by reference.
1. Financial Statements
The following financial statements of the Registrant as set forth under Part II, Item 8 of this reportAnnual Report on Form 10-K on the pages indicated.
 
Page in this
Form 10-K
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
2. Financial Statement Schedules
All schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission are not required under the related instructions or are inapplicable and, therefore, have been omitted.
3. Exhibits
The exhibits listed in the accompanying “Exhibit Index” are filed as part of, or incorporated by reference into, this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
2.1
2.2
3.1Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Newpark Resources, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 10-K405 for the year ended December 31, 1998 filed on March 31, 1999 (SEC File No. 001-02960).
3.2Certificate of Designation of Series A Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock of Newpark Resources, Inc. incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 27, 1999 (SEC File No. 001-02960).
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
*4.1
4.2Specimen form of common stock certificate of Newpark Resources, Inc., incorporated by reference to the exhibit filed with the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (SEC File No. 33-40716).


4.3
4.4
†10.1
†10.2
†10.3
†10.4
†10.5
†10.6
†10.7
†10.8
†10.9
†10.10
†10.11
†10.12
†10.13
†10.14
†10.15
†10.16
†10.17
†10.18


†10.19
†10.20
†10.21
†10.22
†10.23
†10.24
†10.25
10.26
10.27
10.28
10.29
†10.30
†10.31
†10.32
†10.33
†10.34
†10.35
†10.36
†10.37
†10.38
†10.39


†10.40
†10.41
†10.42
†10.43
†10.44
†10.45
†10.46
†10.47
†10.48
†10.49
†10.50
†10.51
†10.52
†10.53
†10.54
†10.55
†10.56
†10.57
†10.58
†10.59


†10.60
†10.61
†10.62
†10.63
†10.64
†10.65
†10.66
†10.67
†10.68
10.69
10.70
10.71
*21.1
*23.1
*31.1
*31.2
**32.1
**32.2
*95.1
*101.INSXBRL Instance Document - the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document
*101.SCHInline XBRL Schema Document
*101.CALInline XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document
*101.LABInline XBRL Label Linkbase Document
*101.PREInline XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document
*101.DEFInline XBRL Definition Linkbase Document
*104Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101)



†     Management compensation plan or agreement.
*     Filed herewith.
**   Furnished herewith.
ITEM 16. Form 10-K Summary
None.




SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 NEWPARK RESOURCES, INC.
 
 By: /s/ Paul L. Howes
  Paul L. Howes
  President and Chief Executive Officer
Dated: February 24, 201721, 2020
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signatures TitleDate
    
/s/ Paul L. Howes President, Chief Executive Officer and DirectorFebruary 24, 201721, 2020
Paul L. Howes (Principal Executive Officer) 
    
/s/ Gregg S. Piontek Senior Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerFebruary 24, 201721, 2020
Gregg S. Piontek (Principal Financial Officer) 
    
/s/ Douglas L. White Corporate Controller andVice President, Chief Accounting Officer and TreasurerFebruary 24, 201721, 2020
Douglas L. White (Principal Accounting Officer) 
    
/s/ David C. AndersonAnthony J. Best Chairman of the BoardFebruary 24, 2017
David C. Anderson
/s/ Anthony J. BestDirector, Member of the Audit CommitteeFebruary 24, 201721, 2020
Anthony J. Best
   
    
/s/ G. Stephen Finley Director, Member of the Audit CommitteeFebruary 24, 201721, 2020
G. Stephen Finley
   
    
/s/ Roderick A. Larson Director, Member of the Audit CommitteeFebruary 24, 201721, 2020
Roderick A. Larson   
    
/s/ James W. McFarlandJohn C. Mingé Director, Member of the Audit CommitteeFebruary 24, 201721, 2020
James W. McFarland
John C. Mingé   
    
/s/ Gary L. WarrenRose M. Robeson Director, Member of the Audit CommitteeFebruary 24, 201721, 2020
Gary L. WarrenRose M. Robeson   


NEWPARK RESOURCES, INC
EXHIBIT INDEX
The exhibits listed are filed as part of, or incorporated by reference into, this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
80
3.1Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Newpark Resources, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 10-K405 for the year ended December 31, 1998 filed on March 31, 1999 (SEC File No. 001-02960).
3.2Certificate of Designation of Series A Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock of Newpark Resources, Inc. incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 27, 1999 (SEC File No. 001-02960).
3.3Certificate of Designation of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock of Newpark Resources, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 7, 2000 (SEC File No. 001-02960).
3.4Certificate of Rights and Preferences of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock of Newpark Resources, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 4, 2001 (SEC File No. 001-02960).
3.5Certificate of Amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Newpark Resources, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 4, 2009 (SEC File No. 001-02960).
3.6Certificate of Amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Newpark Resources, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on July 29, 2016 (SEC File No. 001-02960).
3.7Amended and Restated Bylaws, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 13, 2007 (SEC File No. 001-02960).
4.1Specimen form of common stock certificate of Newpark Resources, Inc., incorporated by reference to the exhibit filed with the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (SEC File No. 33-40716).
4.2Indenture, dated October 4, 2010, between Newpark Resources, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 4, 2010 (SEC File No. 001-02960).
4.3First Supplemental Indenture, dated October 4, 2010, between Newpark Resources, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 4, 2010 (SEC File No. 001-2960).
4.4Form of 4.00% Convertible Senior Note due 2017, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 4, 2010 (SEC File No. 001-2960).
4.5Indenture, dated December 5, 2016, between Newpark Resources, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 5, 2016 (SEC File No. 001-02960).
4.6Form of 4.00% Convertible Senior Note due 2021, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 5, 2016 (SEC File No. 001-02960).
*10.1Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of December 31, 2008, between the registrant and Paul L. Howes, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 1, 2009 (SEC File No. 001-02960).
10.2Indemnification Agreement, dated June 7, 2006, between the registrant and Paul L. Howes, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 13, 2006 (SEC File No. 001-02960).
*10.3Employment Agreement, dated as of September 18, 2006, by and between Newpark Resources, Inc. and Mark J. Airola, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 20, 2006 (SEC File No. 001-02960).
*10.4Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement under the Newpark Resources, Inc. 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on March 26, 2007 (SEC File No. 333-0141577).
*10.5Employment Agreement between Newpark Resources, Inc. and Bruce Smith dated April 20, 2007, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 filed on May 8, 2007 (SEC File No. 001-02960).
10.6Amendment to the Indemnification Agreement between Newpark Resources, Inc. and Paul L. Howes dated September 11, 2007, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 14, 2007 (SEC File No. 001-02960).
*10.7Newpark Resources, Inc., 2008 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on December 9, 2008 (SEC File No. 333-156010).


*10.8Form of Change of Control Agreement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 filed on May 2, 2008 (SEC File No. 001-02960).
*10.9Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between Newpark Resources, Inc. and Paul L. Howes dated April 20, 2009, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 23, 2009 (SEC File No. 001-02960).
*10.10Amendment to Employment Agreement between Newpark Resources, Inc. and Bruce C. Smith dated April 22, 2009, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 23, 2009 (SEC File No. 001-02960).
*10.11Amendment to Employment Agreement between Newpark Resources, Inc. and Mark J. Airola dated April 22, 2009, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 23, 2009 (SEC File No. 001-02960).
*10.12Employment Agreement, dated as of October 15, 2010, by and between Newpark Resources, Inc. and Jeffery L. Juergens, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 18, 2010 (SEC File No. 001-02960).
*10.13Newpark Resources, Inc. 2010 Annual Cash Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 2, 2010 (SEC File No. 001-02960).
†*10.14Director Compensation Summary.
*10.15Newpark Resources, Inc. 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (As Amended and Restated Effective June 10, 2009), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on August 14, 2009 (SEC File No. 333-161378).
*10.16Amendment No. 1 to the Newpark Resources, Inc. 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (As Amended and Restated Effective June 10, 2009), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on June 9, 2011 (SEC File No. 333-174807).
*10.17Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement under the Newpark Resources, Inc. 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (As Amended and Restated Effective June 10, 2009) (as amended), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.9 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on June 9, 2011 (SEC File No. 333-174807).
*10.18Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement under the Newpark Resources, Inc. 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (As Amended and Restated Effective June 10, 2009) (as amended), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.10 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on June 9, 2011 (SEC File No. 333-174807).
*10.19Form of Restricted Stock Agreement under the Newpark Resources, Inc. 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (As Amended and Restated Effective June 10, 2009) (as amended), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.11 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on June 9, 2011 (SEC File No. 333-174807).
*10.20Form of Restricted Stock Agreement under the Newpark Resources, Inc. 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (As Amended and Restated Effective June 10, 2009) (as amended), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.12 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on June 9, 2011 (SEC File No. 333-174807).
*10.21Employment Agreement, dated October 18, 2011, by and between Newpark Resources, Inc. and Gregg Steven Piontek, incorporated by reference to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 21, 2011 (SEC File No. 001-02960).
10.22Indemnification Agreement, dated October 26, 2011, between Gregg S. Piontek and Newpark Resources, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 31, 2011 (SEC File No. 001-02960).
*10.23Form of Restricted Stock Unit for Participants Outside the United States under the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (As Amended and Restated Effective June 10, 2009) (as amended), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on July 27, 2012 (SEC File No. 001-02960).
*10.24Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement for Participants Outside the United States under the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (As Amended and Restated Effective June 10, 2009) (as amended), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on July 27, 2012 (SEC File No. 001-02960).
*10.25Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated December 31, 2012, between Mark Airola and Newpark Resources, Inc., incorporated by reference to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 4, 2013 (SEC File No. 001-02960).
*10.26Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated December 31, 2012, between Bruce Smith and Newpark Resources, Inc., incorporated by reference to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 4, 2013 (SEC File No. 001-02960).
10.27Membership Interests Purchase Agreement, dated February 10, 2014, by and among Newpark Resources, Inc., Newpark Drilling Fluids LLC and ecoserv, LLC, incorporated by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on April 25, 2014 (SEC File No. 001-02960).
*10.28Newpark Resources, Inc. 2014 Non-Employee Directors’ Restricted Stock Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on May 22, 2014 (SEC File No. 333-196164).


*10.29Form of Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Agreement under the Newpark Resources, Inc. 2014 Non-Employee Directors’ Restricted Stock Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on May 22, 2014 (SEC File No. 333-196164).
10.30Form of Indemnification Agreement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on July 25, 2014 (SEC File No. 001-02960).
10.31Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated March 6, 2015 by and among Newpark Resources, Inc., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Bank of America, N.A., as Syndication Agent, Wells Fargo, National Association, as Documentation Agent, and lenders who are parties thereto, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 10, 2015 (SEC File No. 001-02960).
*10.32Newpark Resources, Inc. 2015 Employee Equity Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed May 22, 2015 (SEC File No. 333-204403).
*10.33Form of Restricted Stock Agreement (time vested) under the Newpark Resources, Inc. 2015 Employee Equity Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed May 22, 2015 (SEC File No. 333-204403).
*10.34Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (performance-based) under the Newpark Resources, Inc. 2015 Employee Equity Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.9 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed May 22, 2015 (SEC File No. 333-204403).
*10.35Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (retirement eligible) under the Newpark Resources, Inc. 2015 Employee Equity Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.10 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed May 22, 2015 (SEC File No. 333.204403).
*10.36Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (not retirement eligible) under the Newpark Resources, Inc. 2015 Employee Equity Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.11 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed May 22, 2015 (SEC File No. 333.204403).
*10.37Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (international) under the Newpark Resources, Inc. 2015 Employee Equity Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.12 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed May 22, 2015 (SEC File No. 333.204403).
*10.38Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement (retirement eligible) under the Newpark Resources, Inc. 2015 Employee Equity Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.13 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed May 22, 2015 (SEC File No. 333.204403).
*10.39Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement (not retirement eligible) under the Newpark Resources, Inc. 2015 Employee Equity Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.14 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed May 22, 2015 (SEC File No. 333.204403).
*10.40Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement (international) under the Newpark Resources, Inc. 2015 Employee Equity Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.15 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed May 22, 2015 (SEC File No. 333.204403).
10.41First Amendment to Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated December 18, 2015, by and among Newpark Resources, Inc., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Bank of America, N.A., as Syndication Agent, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Documentation Agent, and the lenders who are parties thereto, incorporate by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 21, 2015 (SEC File No. 001-02960).
*10.42Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of February 16, 2016, between Newpark Resources, Inc. and Paul L. Howes, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 18, 2016 (SEC File No. 001-02960).
*10.43Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of February 16, 2016 between Newpark Resources, Inc. and Gregg S. Piontek, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 18, 2016 (SEC File No. 001-02960).
*10.44Amendment to Employment Agreement dated February 16, 2016 between Newpark Resources, Inc. and Bruce C. Smith, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 18, 2016 (SEC File No. 001-02960).
*10.45Amendment to Employment Agreement dated February 16, 2016 between Newpark Resources, Inc. and Mark J. Airola, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 18, 2016 (SEC File No. 001-02960).
*10.46Amendment to Employment Agreement dated February 16, 2016 between Newpark Resources, Inc. and Jeffery L. Juergens, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 18, 2016 (SEC File No. 001-02960).
*10.47Employment Agreement, dated as of April 22, 2016, by and between Newpark Resources, Inc. and Matthew S. Lanigan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on July 29, 2016 (SEC File No. 001-02960).


*10.48Change in Control Agreement dated as of April 22, 2016 by and between Newpark Resources, Inc. and Matthew S. Lanigan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on July 29, 2016 (SEC File No. 001-02960).
*10.49Executive Separation and General Release Agreement between Newpark Resources, Inc. and Jeffery L. Juergens, dated May 10, 2016, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 12, 2016 (SEC File No. 001-02960).
 10.50ABL Facility Agreement dated May 12, 2016 by and among Newpark Resources, Inc., Newpark Drilling Fluids LLC, Newpark Mats & Integrated Services LLC, Excalibar Minerals LLC and Dura-Base Nevada, Inc., as borrowers, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and an L/C Issuer, and the other Lenders party thereto, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 13, 2016 (SEC File No. 001-02960).
*10.51Amendment No. 1 to Newpark Resources, Inc. 2015 Employee Equity Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on May 19, 2016 (333-211459).
10.52Purchase Agreement, dated November 29, 2016, by and between Newpark Resources, Inc. and Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, as representative of the several initial purchasers named therein, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 5, 2016 (SEC File No. 001-02960).
*10.53Letter Agreement dated as of December 13, 2016 between Newpark Resources, Inc. and Paul L. Howes, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 15, 2016 (SEC File No. 001-02960).
*10.54Letter Agreement dated as of December 13, 2016 between Newpark Resources, Inc. and Gregg S. Piontek, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 15, 2016 (SEC File No. 001-02960).
*10.55Letter Agreement dated as of December 13, 2016 between Newpark Resources, Inc. and Bruce C. Smith, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 15, 2016 (SEC File No. 001-02960).
*10.56Letter Agreement dated as of December 13, 2016 between Newpark Resources, Inc. and Mark J. Airola, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 15, 2016 (SEC File No. 001-02960).
†10.57First Amendment to Credit Agreement dated February 21, 2017 by and among Newpark Resources, Inc., Newpark Drilling Fluids LLC, Newpark Mats and Integrated Services LLC, Excalibar Minerals LLC and Dura-Base Nevada, Inc., as borrowers, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and a L/C Issuer, and the other Lenders party thereto.
†21.1Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
†23.1Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
†31.1Certification of Paul L. Howes pursuant to Rule 13a-14 or 15d-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
†31.2Certification of Gregg S. Piontek pursuant to Rule 13a-14 or 15d-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
†32.1Certification of Paul L. Howes pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
†32.2Certification of Gregg S. Piontek pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
†95.1Reporting requirements under the Mine Safety and Health Administration.
†101.INSXBRL Instance Document
†101.SCHXBRL Schema Document
†101.CALXBRL Calculation Linkbase Document
†101.LABXBRL Label Linkbase Document
†101.PREXBRL Presentation Linkbase Document
†101.DEFXBRL Definition Linkbase Document

†     Filed herewith.
*     Management compensation plan or agreement

74