UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549


FORM 10-K X

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2000 or TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 2002

Commission File Number 0-753


PENN VIRGINIA CORPORATION

One Radnor Corporate Center, Suite 200

100 Matsonford Road

Radnor, PA 19087 Registrant's

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (610) 687-8900 Incorporated in I.R.S Employer Identification Number VIRGINIA 23-1184320

Incorporated in

I.R.S. Employer Identification Number

VIRGINIA

23-1184320


Securities registered pursuant to section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities Registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Title of Each Class

Title of Each Class


Name of Exchange on which registered Common Stock, $6.25 Par Value New York Stock Exchange on which registered


Common Stock, $6.25 Par Value

New York Stock Exchange


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes  Xx  No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant'sregistrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  The¨

Indicate by check mark whether registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).  Yes  x  No  ¨

State the aggregate market value of the voting stockand non-voting common equity held by non- affiliatesnon-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the Corporation at February 14, 2001 was $280,018,348, based onlast business day of the closing price of $32.90 per share. registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter. $348,612,796.

As of that date, 8,511,196February 27, 2003, 8,947,418 shares of common stock of the registrant were issued and outstanding. The number of shareholders of record of the registrant was 778 as of February 14, 2001.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE: Part Into Which Incorporated (1) Proxy Statement for Stockholder Meeting on May 1, 2001 PartIII

Part Into

Which Incorporated


(1) Proxy Statement for Annual Shareholders Meeting on May 6, 2003

Part III.



Penn Virginia Corporation and Subsidiaries Part I 1.Business 2.Properties 3.Legal Proceedings 4.Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders Part II 5.Market for the Company's Common Stock and Related Stockholder Matters 6.Selected Financial Data 7.Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data 9.Changes In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure Part III 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant 11. Executive Compensation 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions Part IV 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K

   

Part I

   

1.

  

Business

  

3

2.

  

Properties

  

14

3.

  

Legal Proceedings

  

18

4.

  

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

  

18

   

Part II

   

5.

  

Market for the Registrant’s Common Stock and Related Shareholder Matters

  

19

6.

  

Selected Financial Data

  

20

7.

  

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

  

21

8.

  

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

  

41

9.

  

Changes In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

  

73

   

Part III

   

10.

  

Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant

  

73

11.

  

Executive Compensation

  

73

12.

  

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

  

73

13.

  

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

  

73

14.

  

Controls and Procedures

  

73

   

Part IV

   

15.

  

Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K

  

74

Page 2


Part 1

ITEM 1 - BUSINESS –BUSINESS

General

Penn Virginia Corporation ("(“Penn Virginia"Virginia” or the "Company"“Company”) is a Virginia corporation founded in 1882. The Company isWe are engaged in the exploration, development and production of oil and natural gas primarily in the eastern and Gulf Coast onshore areas of the collection ofUnited States. We also collect royalties and overriding royalty interests on various oil and gas properties as well as the leasing of coalin which we own a mineral rights and the collection of related royalties. Penn Virginia explores for, develops and produces crude oil, condensate and natural gas in the eastern and southern portions of the United States. The Companyfee interest. At December 31, 2002, we had proved reserves of 71,000approximately 5.4 million barrels of oil and condensate and 174241 billion cubic feet (Bcf) of natural gas, or 273 billion cubic feet equivalent (“Bcfe”).

Until October 30, 2001, we also engaged directly in the leasing and management of coal properties in the Central Appalachian region of the United States. In September 2001, we transferred our coal properties and related assets and liabilities to Penn Virginia Resource Partners, L.P. (the “Partnership” or “PVR”), a newly formed Delaware limited partnership. On October 30, 2001, the Partnership completed its initial public offering (“IPO”) of approximately 7.5 million common units at $21.00 per unit, which are traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol PVR. At December 31, 2002, the Partnership owned approximately 615 million tons of proven and probable coal reserves, including approximately 120 million tons of such reserves that were acquired in December 2002 related to a strategic alliance with Peabody Energy Corporation (“Peabody”). The Partnership’s coal reserves are located on 241,000 acres in Virginia, West Virginia, New Mexico and eastern Kentucky. The Partnership does not operate any mines, but has leased its reserves under 51 leases to 28 different operators who mine coal at 61 mines in exchange for royalty payments to PVR. Lessees other than those which are affiliates of Peabody (the “Peabody Lessees”) are generally required to make royalty payments to the Partnership based on the amount of coal they produce from the Partnership’s properties and the price at which they sell the coal, subject to fixed minimum royalty rates per ton. The Peabody Lessees are required to make payments based on fixed royalty rates which escalate annually. In managing its properties, PVR actively works with its lessees to develop efficient methods to exploit reserves and to maximize production from properties. Additionally, the Partnership provides fee-based coal preparation and transportation facilities to some of its lessees to generate coal service revenues. The Partnership also generates timber sales from timber owned. The Partnership owned approximately 168 million board feet (“MMbf”) of timber at December 31, 2000. The Company2002.

Our wholly owned mineral rights to 480 million tonssubsidiary, Penn Virginia Resource GP, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, serves as general partner of mineable and merchantable coal reserves located in central Appalachia atthe Partnership. As of December 31, 2000. Its coal reserves include both surface2002, we owned approximately 45 percent of the Partnership, consisting of a two percent general partner interest, 42 percent subordinated units, and underground mineable seams. The reserves are generally high quality, low-sulfur bituminous coalone percent common units. As part of our ownership of PVR’s general partner, we also own the rights, referred to as Incentive Distribution Rights, to receive an increasing percentage of quarterly distribution of available cash from operating surplus after certain levels of cash distributions have been achieved. See Item 1 – Business – Corporate and are leased to various operators. Other, for more information on Incentive Distribution Rights.

Financial Information The Company operates

We operate in two primary business segments: (1)segments. We are in the oil and natural gas exploration and (2)production business and, through our interests in PVR, we are in the coal royalty and land management. Financial information concerningmanagement business. For financial statement purposes, the Company's business segments can be foundassets, liabilities and earnings of PVR are included in our consolidated financial statements, with the public unitholders’ ownership interest reflected as a minority interest. See Note 1519 (Segment Information) of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, of Penn Virginia Corporation which is included in this report. for financial information concerning our business segments.

Oil and Gas Overview Penn Virginia'sOperations

General

Our oil and gas properties are located primarily in the eastern and southern portionsGulf Coast onshore areas of the United States. At December 31, 2000, the Company2002, we had 175273 Bcfe of proved reserves (174 Bcf of(88 percent natural gas) including 132226 Bcfe ofheld through various working interests and 4347 Bcfe ofheld by royalty interests. Oil and Gas Production During 2000, 31,0002002, 349 thousand barrels of oil and condensate and 11,645 MMcf18.7 Bcf of natural gas, net to the Company'sour interest, were produced from continuing operations compared with 32,000164 thousand barrels and 8,679 MMcf13.1 Bcf in 1999. Average2001. In addition, there were approximately 18 thousand barrels of oil and condensate and 16 million cubic feet (“MMcf”) of natural gas produced from properties which were sold in 2002 and reflected as discontinued operations. We received average prices received by the Company were $26.84of $23.63 and $14.47$22.94 per barrel and $3.95$3.35 and $2.46$4.06 per Mcfthousand cubic feet (“Mcf”) for crude oil and natural gas sales in 20002002 and 1999,2001, respectively. Exploration and Development The CompanyWe also drilled 109 96

Page 3


gross (79.1(65.5 net) wells in 20002002, of which 10090 gross (76.2(60.9 net) were development and nine6 gross (2.9(4.6 net) were exploratory. A total of five3 gross (1.3(1.6 net) exploratory wells were non-productivenot successful.

Transportation

The majority of our natural gas production is transported to market primarily on three major transmission systems. Duke Energy, Inc., Nisource, Inc. and three gross (1.4 net) wells are under evaluation.Dominion Energy, Inc. transported 39 percent, 24 percent and 20 percent, respectively, of our 2002 natural gas production. The Companyremainder was divided among several pipeline companies in Texas, Louisiana and West Virginia. In almost all cases, our natural gas is still evaluatingsold at the unproved propertiesinterconnects with the transmission pipelines. For additional information, see Item 1 – Risks Associated with Business Activities – Oil and Gas – Transportation.

Marketing and Hedging

We generally sell our natural gas using the spot market and short-term fixed price physical contracts. From time to time, we enter into commodity derivative contracts or fixed price physical contracts to mitigate the risk associated with the December 1999 purchasevolatility of natural gas prices. Recently, we have utilized swaps and costless collars in connection with our hedging activities. Gains and losses from hedging activities are included in revenues when the hedged production is sold. We recognized a 20loss of $1.0 million on settled hedging activities in 2002, a gain of $1.9 million in 2001, and no gain or loss in 2000. In 2002, we hedged approximately 44 percent of our natural gas base production at an average NYMEX Henry Hub floor price of $2.98 per MMbtu and a ceiling price of $3.53 per MMbtu. For crude oil, we hedged approximately 76 percent of our 2002 crude oil production at an average floor price or $21.31 per barrel and a ceiling price of $25.72 per barrel. See Item 7 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk, for information about our price risk management positions for 2003, 2004 and the first quarter of 2005.

Coalbed Methane Drilling Venture

In August 2002, we entered into an agreement with CDX Gas, LLC (“CDX”), a private owner of proprietary horizontal drilling technology, to explore for and develop coalbed methane (“CBM”) in 16,000 square miles of property located in Central Appalachia as well as in the Devonian Shale formation. Our agreement with CDX is generally for five years and provides that we and CDX will have a 60 percent and 40 percent working interest, respectively, in future CBM projects conducted on property owned by us and subject to the agreement. On future projects conducted on property not owned by us, we and CDX will generally each have a Texas onshore gulf coast exploration project.50 percent working interest.

Coal Royalty and Land Management Operations

Overview

At December 31, 2002, the Partnership owned and leased approximately 241,000 acres in Virginia, West Virginia, New Mexico and eastern Kentucky containing approximately 615 million tons of coal reserves. The project covers 35,000Partnership earns coal royalty revenue, based on long-term lease agreements, from 28 coal-mining operators actively mining under 51 separate leases at 61 mines. Coal royalty revenues under non-Peabody leases are based on the higher of a percentage of the gross sales price or a fixed price per ton of coal, with pre-established minimum monthly or annual payments. Under the Peabody leases, coal royalty revenues are based on fixed royalty rates which escalate annually, also with pre-established monthly minimums. The Partnership does not operate coal mines. The Partnership provides fee-based coal preparation and transportation facilities to some of its lessees to enhance their production levels and generate additional coal service revenues.

The Partnership’s timber assets consist of various hardwoods, primarily red oak, white oak, yellow poplar and black cherry. The Partnership owned approximately 168 million board feet of standing saw timber at December 31, 2002. The Partnership’s timber inventory only includes timber that can be harvested and is greater than 12 inches in diameter.

In December 2002, the Partnership announced the formation of an important strategic alliance with Peabody Energy Corporation, the largest private sector coal company in the world. Central to the transaction was the purchase from and leaseback to Peabody of approximately 120 million tons of coal reserves located in New Mexico (80 million tons) and northern West Virginia (40 million tons) (the “Peabody Acquisition”). As a result of the Peabody Acquisition, the Partnership’s total reserves increased by approximately 25 percent to 615 million tons. The Peabody Acquisition was funded with $72.5 million in cash and the issuance by the Partnership to

Page 4


Peabody of 1,522,325 common units and 1,240,833 Class B common units. Of the Class B common units issued, 293,700 are currently being held in escrow pending certain approvals from the State of New Mexico and Peabody’s acquisition and transfer to PVR of certain reserves. As a result of the escrow arrangement, approximately five million tons of coal reserves were excluded from reserve totals and 293,700 Class B common units were excluded from units issued in the Partnership’s financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2002.

The alliance with Peabody accomplishes several strategically important goals. It provides geographic diversity by exposing the Partnership to new markets in the western United States and northern Appalachia. The inclusion of affiliates of Peabody as a significant part of the Partnership’s lessee mix adds additional strength and stability to its lessee group. Peabody is incentivized to source additional assets to the Partnership in the future. This incentive is derived not only from Peabody’s ownership of approximately 15 percent of the Partnership’s common units, but also from its right to share in the general partner’s incentive distribution rights if Peabody sells additional coal assets to the Partnership in the future. See Item 1 – Corporate and Other – Partnership Distributions, Incentive Distribution Rights for more information.

In addition to the Peabody Acquisition, in August 2002, the Partnership purchased approximately 16 million tons of coal reserves in northern Appalachia for $12 million. This acquisition was the Partnership’s first outside of central Appalachia. The properties, which include approximately 18,000 mineral acres, contain predominately high sulfur, high BTU coal reserves.

In June 2001, the Partnership acquired the Fork Creek property in West Virginia, purchasing approximately 53 million tons of coal reserves for $33.1 million. In early 2002, the operator at Fork Creek filed for bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code and evidences Penn Virginia's strategyoperations at the mine were idled on March 4, 2002. The operator continued to expandpay minimum royalties until the Partnership recovered its lease on August 31, 2002. In November 2002, the Partnership purchased various infrastructure at Fork Creek for $5.1 million plus the assumption of certain reclamation liabilities and diversifystream mitigation obligations. With control of the reserves, permits and the critical infrastructure, PVR’s management is working diligently to put a new, financially stable operator in place at Fork Creek. As is customary in the Partnership’s operations, PVR intends to assign all related reclamation liabilities to the new operator.

Coal Royalties

The Partnership’s lessees mined approximately 14.3 million tons of coal in 2002 from PVR’s properties and paid an average royalty of $2.20 per ton, compared with approximately 15.3 million tons mined in 2001 at an average royalty of $2.11 per ton.

Timber Sales

Timber is harvested in advance of lessee mining to prevent loss of the resource. Timber is sold as individual parcels in competitive bid sales or on a contract basis, where PVR pays independent contractors to harvest timber while PVR directly markets the product. The Partnership sold approximately 8.3 MMbf in 2002 at an average price of $187 per thousand board feet (“Mbf”), compared with 8.7 MMbf at an average price of $168 per Mbf in 2001.

Coal Services

The Partnership generates coal service revenues from fees charged to lessees for the use of the Partnership’s coal preparation and transportation facilities. The majority of these fees have been generated by the Partnership’s unit train loadout facility, which was completed in April 1999 at a cost of $5.2 million. This facility accommodates 108-car unit trains, which can be loaded in approximately four hours. Lessees utilize the unit train loadout facility to reduce delivery costs incurred by their customers. The Partnership recognized $1.7 million in coal service revenues in 2002 and 2001. Such amounts are reported in other revenues in the Consolidated Statements of Income included herein.

Corporate and Other

Partnership Distributions

We are entitled, through our wholly owned subsidiaries, to receive certain cash distributions payable with respect to the subordinated and common units of PVR held by such subsidiaries as well as certain cash distributions payable with respect to general partner incentive distribution rights held by our general partner subsidiary.

Page 5


Cash Distributions. The Partnership made its first cash distribution of $0.34 per common and subordinated unit in February 2002 for the period October 30, 2001 through December 31, 2001. For 2002, the Partnership made quarterly cash distributions of $0.50 per common unit and subordinated unit. The Partnership intends to increase quarterly cash distributions to $0.52 per common unit and subordinated unit beginning with the distribution payable in May 2003 with respect to the first quarter of 2003.

Incentive Distribution Rights. Our wholly owned subsidiary is the general partner of PVR and, as such, holds certain incentive distribution rights which represent the right to receive an increasing percentage of quarterly distributions of available cash from operating surplus after the Partnership has paid minimum quarterly distributions and certain target distribution levels have been achieved. The minimum quarterly distribution is $0.50 per unit ($2.00 per unit on an annual basis). The incentive distributions rights are payable as follows:

If for any quarter:

PVR has distributed available cash from operating surplus to its common and subordinated unitholders in an amount equal to the minimum quarterly distribution; and

PVR has distributed available cash from operating surplus on outstanding common units in an amount necessary to eliminate any cumulative arrearages in payment of the minimum quarterly distribution;

then, PVR will distribute any additional available cash from operating surplus for that quarter among the unitholders and our general partner subsidiary in the following manner:

First, 98 percent to all unitholders, pro rata, and 2 percent to the general partner, until each unitholder has received a total of $0.55 per unit for that quarter;

Second, 85 percent to all unitholders, and 15 percent to the general partner, until each unitholder has received a total of $0.65 per unit for that quarter;

Third, 75 percent to all unitholders, and 25 percent to the general partner, until each unitholder has received a total of $0.75 per unit for that quarter; and

Thereafter, 50 percent to all unitholders and 50 percent to the general partner.

In each case, the amount of the target distribution set forth above is exclusive of any distributions to common unitholders to eliminate any cumulative arrearages in payment of the minimum quarterly distribution on the common units. In conjunction with the Peabody Acquisition, our general partner subsidiary has issued a special membership interest which entitles Peabody to receive increased percentages, starting at zero and increasing up to 40 percent, of payments PVR makes to our general partner subsidiary with respect to incentive distribution rights if PVR purchases additional assets from Peabody in the future.

Investments

During 2001, we sold 3,307,200 shares of Norfolk Southern Corporation (NYSE: NSC) common stock. The shares were sold in open market transactions on the New York Stock Exchange at an average price of $17.39 per share. Our 3,307,200 common shares of Norfolk Southern Corporation generated dividends of $0.2 million in 2001 and $2.6 million in 2000. We received a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share in 2001, which was a reduction from the $0.20 per share realized in 2000. We had no available-for-sale securities at December 31, 2002 and 2001. See Note 5 (Investments and Dividend Income) of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

Page 6


Risks Associated with Business Activities

Oil and Gas

Competition

The oil and natural gas industry is very competitive. Competition is particularly intense in the acquisition of prospective oil and natural gas properties and oil and gas reserves. Our competitive position depends on our geological, geophysical and engineering expertise, our financial resources, our ability to develop properties and our ability to select, acquire and develop proved reserves. We compete with a substantial number of other companies having larger technical staffs and greater financial and operational resources. Many such companies not only engage in the acquisition, exploration, development and production of oil and natural gas reserves, but also carry on refining operations, electricity generation and the marketing of refined products. We also compete with major and independent oil and gas companies in the marketing and sale of oil and natural gas, and the oil and natural gas industry in general competes with other industries supplying energy and fuel to industrial, commercial and individual consumers. We compete with other oil and natural gas companies in attempting to secure drilling rigs and other equipment necessary for drilling and completion of wells. Such equipment may be in short supply from time to time.

Price Volatility

Historically, natural gas and crude oil prices have been volatile. These prices rise and fall based on changes in market demand and changes in the political, regulatory and economic climate and other factors that affect commodities markets that are generally outside of our control. Some of our projections and estimates are based on assumptions as to the eastern United States through strategic acquisitions,future prices of natural gas and crude oil. These price assumptions are used for planning purposes. We expect our assumptions will change over time and that actual prices in the future may differ from our estimates. Any substantial or extended decline in the actual prices of natural gas and/or crude oil could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position and results of operations (including reduced cash flow and borrowing capacity), the quantities of natural gas and crude oil reserves that we can economically produce, the quantity of estimated proved reserves that may be attributed to our properties and our ability to fund our capital program.

Drilling and Operating Risks

Our drilling operations are subject to various risks common in the industry, including cratering, explosions, fires and exploration. Gathering Penn Virginia transports itsuncontrollable flows of oil, gas or well fluids. Our drilling operations are also subject to the risk that no commercially productive natural gas or oil reserves will be encountered. The cost of drilling, completing and operating wells is often uncertain, and drilling operations may be curtailed, delayed or canceled as a result of a variety of factors, including drilling conditions, pressure or irregularities in formations, equipment failures or accidents and adverse weather conditions.

Transportation

We transport our natural gas to market on various gathering and transmission pipeline systems owned primarily by third parties. Gathering fees are primarily paid by the purchaser of the natural gas. The Company'smajority of natural gas was gathered principally by Dominion Energy, Inc. "Dominion" (formerly Consolidated Natural Gas)sales contracts are one year or less in duration and Columbia Natural Resources "CNR". These two primary providers gathered 35 percent and 38 percent of the Company's natural gas for 2000 and 1999, respectively.contain relevant monthly index pricing provisions. Interruptible gathering rates have increased over the years as pipelines have implemented the mandatory unbundling of gathering services (Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Order 636) from other transportation services. Dominion's interruptible gathering rates were 19.4 cents per MMbtu for 2000In 2002, Duke Energy, Inc. gathered and effective January 1, 2001, were changed to a 9.3transported approximately 39 percent volumetric retainage. CNR's interruptible gathering rate was 32 cents per MMbtu in 2000; however, the Company does not expect to incur any gathering expense from CNR in 2001 as a result of the divestiture of non-strategic oil and gas properties in December 2000. Transportation The majority of Penn Virginia'sour natural gas, production is transported to market primarily on three major transmission systems.Nisource, Inc. (formerly Columbia Gas Transmission, Dominion and Duke transported 45 percent, 30Transmission) approximately 24 percent, and 19Dominion Energy, Inc. approximately 20 percent, respectively, ofwith the Company's 2000 natural gas production. The volume transported by Columbia Gas Transmission is expected to decreaseremainder divided among several pipeline companies in 2001 due to the divestiture of non-strategic oilTexas, West Virginia and gas properties in December 2000.Louisiana. Production could be adversely affected by shutdowns of the pipelines for maintenance or replacement as pipeline flexibility istransportation options are limited. Marketing Penn Virginia generally sells its

Regulation

State Regulatory Matters. Various aspects of our oil and natural gas usingoperations are regulated by administrative agencies under statutory provisions of the spot marketstates where such operations are conducted. All of the jurisdictions in which we own or operate producing crude oil and short-term fixed price physical contracts. From timenatural gas properties have statutory provisions regulating the exploration for and production of crude oil and natural gas. These provisions include the permitting for the drilling of wells, maintaining bonding requirements in order to time,drill or operate wells, provisions relating to the Company enters into commodity derivative contractslocation of wells, the method of drilling and casing wells, the surface use and restoration of properties upon which wells are drilled, and the plugging and abandoning of wells. Our operations are also subject to various conservation laws and regulations. These include the regulation of the size of drilling and spacing units or fixed price physical contracts to mitigateproration units, the risk associated withnumber of wells that may be

Page 7


drilled in an area, and the volatilityunitization or pooling of crude oil and natural gas properties. In addition, state conservation laws establish maximum rates of production from crude oil and natural gas wells, generally prohibit the venting or flaring of natural gas, prices.and impose certain requirements regarding the ratability or fair apportionment of production from fields and individual wells. The effect of these regulations is to limit the amounts of crude oil and natural gas we can produce from our wells, and to limit the number of wells or the locations at which we can drill.

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) regulates the transportation and sale for resale of natural gas in interstate commerce under the Natural Gas Act of 1938 (“NGA”) and the Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978 (“NGPA”). In the past, the Federal government has regulated the prices at which oil and gas pricing was extremely volatilecould be sold. The Natural Gas Wellhead Decontrol Act of 1989 (the “Decontrol Act”) removed all NGA and NGPA price and nonprice controls affecting producers’ wellhead sales of natural gas effective January 1, 1993. While sales by producers of natural gas, and all sales of crude oil, condensate and natural gas liquids can currently be made at market prices, Congress could reenact price controls in 2000. Inthe future.

Commencing in April 1992, the FERC issued Order Nos. 636, 636-A, 636-B and May636-C (“Order No. 636”), which require interstate pipelines to provide transportation separate, or “unbundled,” from the pipelines’ sales of 2000, the Company entered into several physical contracts that totaled 9,289 MMcf per day for the remainder of 2000. The volumes under contract accounted for 20 percent of Penn Virginia's 2000 production at a price of $3.39 per Mcf. The Company has one contract remaining that expires in March 2001 covering 18 percent of anticipated first quarter production at $3.12 per Mcf. In January 2001, the Company hedged 13 percent of its anticipated production for the second and third quarters of 2001 throughgas. Also, Order No. 636 requires pipelines to provide open-access transportation on a basis hedgethat is equal for all gas supplies. Although Order No. 636 does not directly regulate gas producers like Penn Virginia Corporation, the FERC has stated that it intends for Order No. 636 to foster increased competition within all phases of the natural gas industry. The courts have largely affirmed the significant features of Order No. 636 and numerous related orders pertaining to the individual pipelines, although certain appeals remain pending and the FERC continues to review and modify its open access regulations. In particular, the FERC has issued Order No. 637, which, among other things, (i) permits pipelines to charge different maximum cost-based rates for peak and off-peak times, (ii) encourages auctions for pipeline capacity, (iii) requires pipelines to implement imbalance management services, and (iv) restricts the ability of pipelines to impose penalties for imbalances, overruns, and non-compliance with operational flow orders. In addition, the FERC has implemented regulations governing the procedure for obtaining authorization to construct new pipeline facilities and has issued a costless collarpolicy statement, which it largely affirmed in a recent order on rehearing, establishing a presumption in favor of requiring owners of new pipeline facilities to charge rates based solely on the costs associated with a floor of $4.95 per Mcf and a ceiling of $7.16 per Mcf. Additionally, basis hedges covering ansuch new pipeline facilities.

While any additional 11 percent of anticipated production for the same periods were executed. Gains and losses from hedging activitiesFERC action on these matters would affect us only indirectly, these changes are includedintended to further enhance competition in natural gas revenues whenmarkets. We cannot predict what further action the hedged production occurs. The Company recognized a lossFERC will take on these matters, nor can we predict whether the FERC’s actions will achieve its stated goal of $0.4 millionincreasing competition in 1999natural gas markets. However, we do not believe that we will be treated materially differently than other natural gas producers and $0.7 million in 1998 on hedging activitiesmarkets with no gain or loss recognized in 2000. Effective January 1, 2001, the Company will account for its derivative activities in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 133, as amended by SFAS 137 and SFAS 138. See Note 2 (New Accounting Standards) in the financial statements. Coal Royalty and Land Management Operations Overview Penn Virginia owned 163,000 acres of coal- and timber-bearing land in central Appalachia at December 31, 2000. The Company earns coal royalty revenue, based on long-term lease agreements, from 19 coal mining operators. Coal royalty revenue is based on a minimum annual payment, a minimum dollar royalty per ton and/or a percentage of the coal's selling price. The Company does not operate coal mines. The Company's timber assets consist of various hardwoods, primarily red oak, white oak, yellow poplar and black cherry. Penn Virginia owns an estimated 177 million board feet of standing saw timber. The Company's timber inventory only includes timber that can be harvested and is greater than 12 inches in diameter. Coal Production Lessees mined 12.5 million tons of coal from Penn Virginia's properties in 2000 and paid an average royalty of $1.94 per ton, compared with 8.6 million tons mined in 1999 at an average royalty of $2.07 per ton. At December 31, 2000, the Company's mineable and merchantable coal reserves in central Appalachia were estimated at 480 million tons. At December 31, 2000, the Company's central Appalachia properties had 19 operators actively mining a total of 31 separate lease locations. Timber Production The Company sold 8.5 MMbf in 2000 for an average price of $257 per Mbf, compared with 9.0 MMbf at an average price of $206 per Mbf in 1999. Timber is harvested in advance of lessee mining to prevent loss of the resource. Timber is sold in competitive bid sales involving individual parcels and also on a contract basis, whereby Penn Virginia pays independent contractors to harvest timber while the Company directly markets the product. Corporate and Other Investments The Company holds available-for-sale securities, primarily in Norfolk Southern Corporation. The Company's 3,307,200 common shares of Norfolk Southern Corporation (NYSE symbol: NSC) generated dividends of $2.6 million in 2000, 1999 and 1998. Penn Virginia received a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share in 2000, 1999 and 1998; however, in January 2001, Norfolk Southern Corporation reduced its quarterly dividend to $0.06 per share. The fair value of the Company's equity portfolio at December 31, 2000 was $44.1 million compared with $67.8 million at December 31, 1999. See Note 4 (Investments and Dividend Income) of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information. Risks Associated with Business Activities General Government Regulations Each of Penn Virginia's businesses is subject to extensive rules and regulations promulgated by variouswhich we compete.

Environmental Matters. Extensive federal, state and local government agencies. Failurelaws govern oil and natural gas operations, regulate the discharge of materials into the environment or otherwise relate to the protection of the environment. Numerous governmental departments issue rules and regulations to implement and enforce such laws that are often difficult and costly to comply with suchand which carry substantial administrative, civil and even criminal penalties for failure to comply. Some laws, rules and regulations can resultrelating to protection of the environment may, in substantial penalties.certain circumstances, impose “strict liability” for environmental contamination, rendering a person liable for environmental and natural resource damages and cleanup costs without regard to negligence or fault on the part of such person. Other laws, rules and regulations may restrict the rate of oil and natural gas production below the rate that would otherwise exist or even prohibit exploration or production activities in sensitive areas. In addition, state laws often require some form of remedial action to prevent pollution from former operations, such as closure of inactive pits and plugging of abandoned wells. The regulatory burden on the oil and natural gas industry increases the Company'sits cost of doing business and consequently affects its profitability. These laws, rules and regulations affect our operations, as well as the oil and gas exploration and production industry in general. We believe that we are in substantial compliance with current applicable environmental laws, rules and regulations and that continued compliance with existing requirements will not have a material adverse impact on us. Nevertheless, changes in existing environmental laws or the adoption of new environmental laws have the potential to adversely affect our operations.

Page 8


Coal Royalty and Land Management

Although the Company believesPartnership intends to make quarterly cash distributions of $0.52 per common unit, it can only do so to the extent it has sufficient cash from operations after payment of fees and expenses. In addition, quarterly distributions are payable on our subordinated units only after each common unit has received a distribution of $0.52 plus any arrearages due from prior quarters. Incentive distributions are payable to our general partner subsidiary after cash distributions per unit exceed $0.55 in any quarter. The Partnership’s revenues and its ability to make quarterly and incentive distributions are subject to several risks, including those described below.

Competition

The coal industry is intensely competitive primarily as a result of the existence of numerous producers. The Partnership’s lessees compete with coal producers in materialvarious regions of the U.S. for domestic sales. The industry has undergone significant consolidation that has led to some of the competitors of the Partnership’s lessees located in Appalachia to have significantly larger financial and operating resources than the Partnership’s lessees do. The Partnership’s lessees primarily compete with both large and small producers in Appalachia as well as the western United States. They compete on the basis of coal price at the mine, coal quality (including sulfur content), transportation cost from the mine to the customer and the reliability of supply. Continued demand for the Partnership’s coal and the prices that the Partnership’s lessees obtain are also affected by demand for electricity, environmental and government regulations, technological developments and the availability and price of alternative fuel supplies, including nuclear, natural gas, oil and hydroelectric power. Demand for the Partnership’s low sulfur coal and the prices the Partnership’s lessees will be able to obtain for it will also be affected by the price and availability of high sulfur coal, which can be marketed in tandem with emissions allowances in order to meet federal Clean Air Act requirements.

Operating Risks

General Regulation. The Partnership’s lessees are obligated to conduct mining operations in compliance with all rules,applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations. These laws and regulations include matters involving the discharge of materials into the environment, employee health and safety, mine permits and other licensing requirements, reclamation and restoration of mining properties after mining is completed, management of materials generated by mining operations, surface subsidence from underground mining, water pollution, legislatively mandated benefits for current and retired coal miners, air quality standards, protection of wetlands, plant and wildlife protection, limitations on land use, storage of petroleum products and substances which are regarded as hazardous under applicable laws, thereand management of electrical equipment containing polychlorinated biphenyls, or PCBs. Because of extensive and comprehensive regulatory requirements, violations during mining operations are not unusual in the industry and, notwithstanding compliance efforts, we do not believe violations by the Partnership’s lessees can be no assurance that new interpretations of existing rules, regulations and laws will not adversely affect the Company's business and operations. Competition The energy industry is highly competitive. Manyeliminated completely. However, none of the Company's competitors are large, well-established companies with substantially larger operating staffs, greater capital resources and established long-term strategic positions. Oil and Gas Prices Penn Virginia's revenues, profitability andviolations to date, or the monetary penalties assessed, have been material to us, to the Partnership or, to our knowledge, to the Partnership’s lessees. We do not currently expect that future rate of growth are highly dependent on the prevailing prices for oil and gas, which are affected by numerous factors that are generally beyond the Company's control. Crude oil prices are generally determined by global supply and demand. Natural gas prices are influenced by national and regional supply and demand. A substantial or extended decline in the prices of oil or gas couldcompliance will have a material adverse effect on us or the Company's revenues, profitabilityPartnership.

While it is not possible to quantify the costs of compliance by the Partnership’s lessees with all applicable federal and cash flowstate laws, those costs have been and could, under certain circumstances, result in an impairment of the Company's oilare expected to continue to be significant. The lessees post performance bonds pursuant to federal and gas properties. In Aprilstate mining laws and May of 2000, the Company entered into several physical contracts that totaled 9,289 MMcf per dayregulations for the remainderestimated costs of 2000.reclamation and mine closing, including the cost of treating mine water discharge when necessary. The volumes under contract accountedPartnership does not accrue for 20 percentsuch costs because its lessees are contractually liable for all costs relating to their mining operations, including the costs of Penn Virginia's 2000 production at a price of $3.39 per Mcf. The Company has one contract remaining that expires in March 2001 covering 18 percent of anticipated first quarter production at $3.12 per Mcf. In January 2001,reclamation and mine closure. However, the Company hedged 13 percent of its anticipated productionPartnership does require some smaller lessees to deposit certain funds into escrow for reclamation and mine closure costs or post performance bonds for these costs. Although the second and third quarters of 2001 through a basis swap and a costless collar with a floor of $4.95 per Mcf and a ceiling of $7.16 per Mcf. Additionally, basis swaps covering an additional 11 percent of anticipated productionlessees typically accrue adequate amounts for the same periods were executed. Gains and losses from hedging activities are included in natural gas revenues when the hedged production occurs. The Company recognized a loss of $0.4 million in 1999 and $0.7 million in 1998 on hedging activities with no gain or loss recognized in 2000. Effective January 1, 2001, the Company will account for its derivative activities in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 133, as amended by SFAS 137 and SFAS 138. See Note 2 (New Accounting Standards) in the financial statements. Exploratory Drilling Both development and exploratory drilling involve risks. However, exploratory drilling involves greater risks of dry holes or failure to find commercial quantities of hydrocarbons than does development drilling. The Company anticipates the number of exploratory prospects drilled in the short and long-term may increase, compared with historical amounts. Consequently, it is likely that the Company will experience increased levels of exploration expense in 2001 and beyond. Transportation The majority of Penn Virginia's natural gas production is transported to market primarily on three major transmission systems. Columbia Gas Transmission, Dominion and Duke transported 45 percent, 30 percent and 19 percent, respectively, of the Company's 2000 natural gas production. The volume transported by Columbia Gas Transmission is expected to decrease in 2001 due to the divestiture of non-strategic oil and gas properties in December 2000. Production couldthese costs, their future operating results would be adversely affected by shutdownsif they later determined these accruals to be insufficient. Compliance with these laws has substantially increased the cost of coal mining for all domestic coal producers.

In addition, the utility industry, which is the most significant end-user of coal, is subject to extensive regulation regarding the environmental impact of its power generation activities which could affect demand for the Partnership’s lessees’ coal. The possibility exists that new legislation or regulations may be adopted which may have a significant impact on the mining operations of the pipelinesPartnership’s lessees or their customers’ ability to use coal and may require the Partnership, its lessees or their customers to change operations significantly or incur substantial costs.

Page 9


Regulation

Clean Air Act. The Clean Air Act affects the end-users of coal and could significantly affect the demand for maintenance or replacement as pipeline flexibility is limited. Coal Royaltythe Partnership’s coal and Land Management Operating Risks Penn Virginia'sreduce the Partnership’s coal royalty stream is impactedrevenues. The Clean Air Act and corresponding state and local laws extensively regulate the amount of sulfur dioxide, particulate matter, nitrogen oxides and other compounds emitted from industrial boilers and power plants, including those that use the Partnership’s coal. These regulations together constitute a significant burden on coal customers and stricter regulation could further adversely impact the demand for and price of the Partnership’s coal, resulting in lower coal royalty revenues.

In July 1997, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency adopted more stringent ambient air quality standards for particulate matter and ozone. Particulate matter includes small particles that are emitted during the combustion process. In a February 2001 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court largely upheld the EPA’s position, although it remanded the EPA’s ozone implementation policy for further consideration. Details regarding the new particulate standard itself are still subject to judicial challenge. These ozone restrictions will require electric power generators to further reduce nitrogen oxide emissions. Nitrogen oxides are naturally occurring byproducts of coal combustion that lead to the formation of ozone. Further reduction in the amount of particulate matter that may be emitted by several factors, whichpower plants could also result in reduced coal consumption by electric power generators. Future regulations regarding ozone, particulate matter and other ambient air standards could restrict the Company generally cannot control. The number of tons mined annually is determined by an operator's mining efficiency, labor availability, geologic conditions, access to capital, ability to market for coal and abilitythe development of new mines by the Partnership’s lessees. This in turn may result in decreased production by the Partnership’s lessees and a corresponding decrease in the Partnership’s coal royalty revenues. These decreases could adversely effect the distributions we receive from the Partnership.

The Clean Air Act also imposes standards on sources of hazardous air pollutants. These standards have not yet been extended to arrange reliable transportationcoal mining operations or by-products of coal combustion, but consideration is now being given to regulating certain hazardous air pollutant components that are found in coal combustion exhaust, including mercury. Like other environmental regulations, these standards and future standards could result in a decreased demand for coal.

Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977. The Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (“SMCRA”) and similar state statutes impose on mine operators the responsibility of restoring the land to its original state or compensating the landowner for types of damages occurring as a result of mining operations, and require mine operators to post performance bonds to ensure compliance with any reclamation obligations. Regulatory authorities may attempt to assign the liabilities of the Partnership’s lessees to the end-user. Coal emissionsPartnership if any of the lessees are regulatednot financially capable of fulfilling those obligations. In conjunction with mining the property, the Partnership’s lessees are contractually obligated under the terms of their leases to comply with all laws, including SMCRA and equivalent state and local laws, which obligations include reclaiming and restoring the mined areas by variousgrading, shaping and reseeding the soil. Upon completion of the mining, reclamation generally is completed by seeding with grasses or planting trees for use as pasture or timberland, as specified in the approved reclamation plan.

CERCLA. The Partnership could become liable under federal and state agencies which affectSuperfund and waste management statutes if its lessees are unable to pay environmental cleanup costs. The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, known as CERCLA or “Superfund,” and similar state laws create liabilities for the qualityinvestigation and remediation of releases and threatened releases of hazardous substances to the environment and damages to natural resources. As a landowner, the Partnership is potentially subject to liability for these investigation and remediation obligations.

Mountaintop Removal Litigation. On January 29, 2003, the United States Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals (the “Circuit Court”) vacated an injunction issued in May 2002 by the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia (the “District Court”). This injunction had prohibited the Huntington, West Virginia office of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (the “Corps”) from issuing permits under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act for the construction of valley fills for the disposal of coal mining overburden. These valleys typically contain steams that, can be burned within compliance guidelines. Corporate and Other Investments The valueunder the Clean Water Act, are considered navigable waters of the Company's investment portfolioUnited States. The District Court had found that the Corp’s permitting of overburden valley fills under Section 404 was a violation of the Clean Water Act since Section 404 allows only the permitting of fill material deposited for a beneficial purpose and not for mere waste disposal such as the disposal of coal overburden. The Circuit Court reversed this finding, concluding, instead, that overburden valley fills may be permitted under Section 404 and remanded the case back to the District Court for further proceedings not inconsistent with the Circuit Court’s opinion.

Mine Health and Safety Laws.Stringent safety and health standards have been imposed by federal legislation since the adoption of the Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969. The Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969 resulted in increased operating costs and reduced productivity. The Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, which significantly expanded the enforcement of health and safety standards of the Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969, imposes comprehensive safety and health standards on all mining operations. In addition, as part of the Mine Health and Safety Acts of 1969 and 1977, the Black Lung Acts require payments of benefits by all businesses conducting current mining operations to coal miners with black lung and to some survivors of a miner who dies from this disease.

Page 10


Mining Permits and Approvals.Numerous governmental permits or approvals are required for mining operations. In connection with obtaining these permits and approvals, the Partnership’s lessees may be required to prepare and present to federal, state or local authorities data pertaining to the effect or impact that any proposed production of coal may have upon the environment. The requirements imposed by any of these authorities may be costly and time consuming and may delay commencement or continuation of mining operations.

In order to obtain mining permits and approvals from state regulatory authorities, mine operators, including the Partnership’s lessees, must submit a reclamation plan for restoring, upon the completion of mining operations, the mined property to its prior condition, productive use or other permitted condition. Typically lessees submit the necessary permit applications between 12 and 18 months before they plan to begin mining a new area. In the Partnership’s experience, permits generally are approved within 12 months after a completed application is submitted. In the past, lessees have generally obtained their mining permits without significant delay. The Partnership’s lessees have obtained or applied for permits to mine a majority of the reserves that are currently planned to be mined by lessees over the next five years. The Partnership’s lessees are in the planning phase for obtaining permits for the remaining reserves planned to be mined over the next five years. However, they cannot make any assurances that they will not experience difficulty in obtaining mining permits in the future.

Timber Regulations.The Partnership’s timber operations are subject to market price fluctuations. federal, state and local laws and regulations, including those related to the environment, protection of endangered species, foresting activities and health and safety. The Partnership believes it is managing its timberlands in substantial compliance with applicable federal and state regulations.

Employees Penn Virginia

We had 68104 employees at December 31, 2000. The Company considers2002, including 30 employees who directly provide services for PVR through its general partner. We consider our relations with itsour employees to be good.

Available Information

The Company’s Internet address is www.pennvirginia.com. We make available free of charge on or through our Internet website our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the Securities and Exchange Commission. To date, we have inadvertently not made so available on our website any current reports on Form 8-K. We will provide, free of charge upon request, electronic or paper copies of all current reports on Form 8-K which were filed from November 15, 2002 to February 15, 2003. We will make available, free of charge, on or through our internet website, all reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed after February 15, 2003 as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such reports with, or furnish them to, the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Page 11


Executive Officers of the Company Below is a list of

The following table sets forth information concerning our executive officers of the Company including their ages and positions held.officers. Each officer is elected annually by the Board of Directors and serves at the pleasure of the Board of Directors.

Office NAME

Name


Age Office Held Since


Position with the Company


A. James Dearlove 53

55

President and Chief Executive Officer 1996 James O.Idiaquez 53

Frank A. Pici

47

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer 2000

Keith D. Horton 47

49

Executive Vice President 2000

H. Baird Whitehead 50

52

Executive Vice President 2001

Nancy M. Snyder 48

49

Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary 1997 Ann N. Horton 42

Dana G. Wright

50

Vice President and Principal Accounting Officer 1995 Controller

A. James Dearlove - Mr. Dearlove is the President and Chief Executive Officer. He has served in various capacities with the Company since 1977, including Viceas President and Chief Executive Officer and a Director of the Company since May 1996, President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company from 1994 to May 1996, Senior Vice President of the Company form 1992 to 1994 and most recently,Vice President since 1994. Mr. Dearlove was electedof the Company from 1986 to the Company's Board of Directors effective February 6, 1996.1992. He was appointedis also Chief Executive Officer in May 1996.and Chairman of the Board of Penn Virginia Resource GP, LLC, the general partner of Penn Virginia Resource Partners, L.P. He also serves as director of the Powell River Project and the National Council of Coal Lessors. James O. Idiaquez -

Frank A. Pici – Mr. IdiaquezPici is anthe Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. He was appointed to these positions in December 2000. He previously served as Vice President- Corporate Development forOfficer of the Company, from October 1998which he joined in September 2001. Mr. Pici is also the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and a Director of Penn Virginia Resource, GP LLC. From 1996 to December 2000. From 1978August 2001, Mr. Pici was Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Mariner Energy, Inc., an oil and gas exploration and production company. Prior to 1998, Mr. Idiaquez1996, he served in various capacities with Cabot Oil & Gas Corporation, including Corporate Controller from 1994 to 1996, Director, Internal Audit from 1992 to 1994, and regional accounting manager from 1989 to 1992. From 1982 to 1989, he held financial management capacities, including corporate planningpositions with companies in the oil and acquisitionsgas and divestitures, with The Louisiana Land & Exploration Company and Burlington Resources, Inc. coal industries.

Keith D. Horton - Mr. Horton serves as President of the Company's coal and land management subsidiary and has served as an executive officer for the Company since 1996. He was appointed Executive Vice President in December 2000. He has served in various capacities with the Company since 1981, including Executive Vice President and was electeda Director of the Company since December 2000, Vice President – Eastern Operations of the Company from May 1996 to May 1997, President of Penn Virginia Coal Company from April 1996 to October 2001, Vice President of Penn Virginia Coal Company from March 1994 to February 1996, Vice President from January 1990 to December 1998, and Manager, Coal Operations from July 1982 to December 1989, of Penn Virginia Resources Corporation. He is also the Company's BoardPresident and Chief Operating Officer and a Director of Directors on December 6, 2000.Penn Virginia Resource, GP LLC. Additionally, Mr. Horton is Chairman of the Central Appalachian Section of the Society of Mining Engineers. He also serves as a director of the Virginia Mining Association, Powell River Project and Virginia Coal Council and the Central Appalachian Section of the Society of Mining Engineers. Council.

H. Baird Whitehead - Mr. Whitehead is an Executive Vice President. He joinedPresident of the Company, which he joined in January 2001. He serves as President of the Company's oil and gas subsidiary. Previously he was employed for the past 20 years atPrior to joining Penn Virginia, Mr. Whitehead served in various positions with Cabot Oil & Gas Corporation in various management positions, most recentlyCorporation. From 1998 to 2001, he served as Senior Vice President. President during which time he oversaw Cabot’s drilling, production, and exploration activity in the Appalachia, Rocky Mountains, Mid-Continent and the Texas and Louisiana Gulf Coast areas. From 1992 to 1998, he was Vice President and Regional Manager of Cabot’s Appalachian business unit and from 1989 to 1992, he was Vice President and Regional Manager of Cabot’s Anadarko business unit. From 1987 to 1989, he served as Vice President of Engineering for Cabot. From 1972 to 1987, he held various engineering and supervisory positions with Texaco, Columbia Gas Transmission, and Cabot.

Nancy M. Snyder - Ms. Snyder has served as Corporate Secretary and General Counsel since joining the Company in 1997. She was appointed as aSenior Vice President of the Company insince February 2003, as Vice President since December 2000. Previously, Ms. Snyder was in private2000 and firm practices in the areas of general corporateas General Counsel and securities law. Ann N. Horton - Mrs. Horton has served as Principal Accounting Officer and ControllerCorporate Secretary of the Company since 1995. She was appointed as a1997. Ms. Snyder is also the Vice President, General Counsel and a Director of Penn Virginia Resource GP, LLC. From 1993 to 1997, Ms. Snyder was a solo practitioner representing clients generally in connection with mergers and acquisitions and general corporate matters. From 1990 to 1993, Ms. Snyder served as general counsel to Nan Duskin, Inc. and its affiliated companies, which were in the businesses of womens’ retail fashion and real estate. From 1983 to 1989, Ms. Snyder was an associate at the law firm of Duane Morris, where she practiced securities, banking and general corporate law.

Dana G. Wright – Mr. Wright joined the Company in December 2000. She has served in various capacitiesJuly 2002 and serves as Vice President and Controller. Prior to joining Penn Virginia, he was employed for 26 years with theAtlantic Richfield Company, and most recently with its subsidiaries since 1981. publicly traded subsidiary, Vastar Resources, Inc. During that time he held a variety of financial, accounting and treasury related positions.

Page 12


The following terms have the meanings indicated below when used in this report. Bbl - means a standard barrel of 42 U.S. gallons liquid volume Bcf - means one billion cubic feet Bcfe - means one billion cubic feet equivalent with one barrel of oil or condensate converted to six thousand cubic feet of natural gas based on the estimated relative energy content Gross - acre or well means an acre or well in which a working interest is owned Mbbl - means one thousand barrels Mbf - means one thousand board feet Mcf - means one thousand cubic feet MMbf - means one million board feet MMbtu - means one million British thermal units MMcf - means one million cubic feet Net - acres or wells is determined by multiplying the gross acres or wells by the owned working interest in those gross acres or wells. Proved Reserves - means those estimated quantities of crude oil, condensate and natural gas that geological and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be recoverable in future years from known oil and gas reservoirs under existing economic and operating conditions

Bbl–

means a standard barrel of 42 U.S. gallons liquid volume

Bcf–

means one billion cubic feet

Bcfe–

means one billion cubic feet equivalent with one barrel of oil or condensate converted to six thousand cubic feet of natural gas based on the estimated relative energy content

Gross–

acre or well means an acre or well in which a working interest is owned

Mbbl–

means one thousand barrels

Mbf–

means one thousand board feet

Mcf–

means one thousand cubic feet

MMbf–

means one million board feet

Mmbtu–

means one million British thermal units

MMcf–

means one million cubic feet

Net–

acres or wells is determined by multiplying the gross acres or wells by the owned working interest in those gross acres or wells

NYMEX–

New York Mercantile Exchange

Present value of proved reserves–

means the present value (discounted at 10%) of estimated future cash flows from proved oil and natural gas reserves, as estimated by our independent engineers, reduced by additional estimated future operating expenses, development expenditures and abandonment costs (net of salvage value) associated therewith (before income taxes)

Probable Coal Reserves–

means those reserves for which quantity and grade and/or quality are computed from information similar to that used for proven reserves, but the sites for inspection, sampling and measurement are farther apart or are otherwise less adequately spaced. The degree of assurance, although lower than that for proven reserves, is high enough to assume continuity between points of observation.

Proved Reserves–

means those estimated quantities of crude oil, condensate and natural gas that geological and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be recoverable in future years from known oil and gas reservoirs under existing economic and operating conditions

Proven Coal Reserves–

means those reserves for which: (a) quantity is computed from dimensions revealed in outcrops, trenches, workings or drill holes; grade and/or quality are computed from the results of detailed sampling; and (b) the sites for inspection, sampling and measurement are spaced so closely, and the geologic character is so well defined, that the size, shape, depth and mineral content of reserves are well-established.

Standardized Measure–

means present value of proved reserves further reduced by the present value (discounted at 10%) of estimated future income taxes on cash flows

Working Interest–

means a cost-bearing interest under an oil and gas lease that gives the holder the right to develop and produce the minerals under the lease

Page 13


ITEM 2 - PROPERTIES –PROPERTIES

Facilities Penn Virginia Corporation is

We are headquartered in Radnor, Pennsylvania with additional offices in Duffield, Virginia;Kingsport, Tennessee, Houston, Texas and Charleston, West Virginia; and Houston, Texas. The Company believes its leasedVirginia. We believe that our properties are adequate for our current needs.

Title to Properties Penn Virginia believes it has

We believe that we have satisfactory title to all of itsour properties in accordance with standards generally accepted in the oil and natural gas and coal royalty and land management industries.

As is customary in the oil and gas industry, the Company makeswe make only a cursory review of title to farmout acreage and to undeveloped oil and gas leases upon execution of any contracts. Prior to the commencement of drilling operations, a thorough title examination is conducted and curative work is performed with respect to significant defects. To the extent title opinions or other investigations reflect defects, Penn Virginia cureswe cure such title defects. If the Company waswe were unable to remedy or cure any title defect of a nature such that it would not be prudent to commence drilling operations on a property, the Companywe could suffer a loss of itsour investment in the property. Prior to completing an acquisition of producing oil and gas leases, the Company obtainsassets, we obtain title opinions on all material leases. Penn Virginia'sOur oil and gas properties are subject to customary royalty interests, liens for current taxes and other burdens that the Company believeswe believe do not materially interfere with the use or affect the value of such properties.

Of the 163,000615 million tons of proven and probable coal reserves to which the Partnership has rights as of December 31, 2002, PVR owned the mineral rights and the majority of related surface rights to 572 million tons, or 93 percent, and leased the remaining 43 million tons, or 7 percent, from unaffiliated third parties. In addition to the revenues the Partnership receives from its coal business, it also earns revenues from the sale of timber. At December 31, 2002, the Partnership owned 114,500 surface acres of coal and timber bearing land, Penn Virginia owns 70 percent in fee and 30 percent in mineral. Additionally, the Company leases over 25,000 acrestimberland containing 168 million board feet of coal andtimber bearing land from third parties. inventory.

Page 14


Oil and Gas

Production and Pricing

The following table sets forth production, sales prices and production costs with respect to the Company'sour properties for the years ended December 31, 2000, 19992002, 2001 and 1998. 2000 1999 1998 Production Oil and condensate (Mbbls) 31 32 30 Natural gas (MMcf) 11,645 8,679 8,056 Average sales price Oil and condensate ($/Bbl) $26.84 $14.47 $11.17 Natural gas ($/Mcf) 3.95 2.46 2.54 Production cost Lease operating expense per Mcfe $0.38 $0.46 $0.46 Lease production taxes per Mcfe 0.24 0.25 0.28 Total production cost per Mcfe $0.62 $0.71 $0.74 Hedging Summary Natural gas prices ($/Mcf): Actual price received for production $3.95 $2.50 $2.61 Effect of derivative hedging activities - (.04) (.07) Average price $3.95 $2.46 $2.54 Proved Reserves
Penn Virginia2000.

   

2002


   

2001


  

2000


Production

             

Oil and condensate (Mbbls)*

  

 

349

 

  

 

164

  

 

31

Natural gas (MMcf)*

  

 

18,697

 

  

 

13,130

  

 

11,645

Total production (MMcfe)*

  

 

20,791

 

  

 

14,114

  

 

11,831

Average sales price

             

Oil and condensate ($/Bbl)

  

$

23.63

 

  

$

22.94

  

$

26.84

Natural gas ($/Mcf)

  

$

3.35

 

  

 

4.06

  

 

3.95

Production cost ($/Mcfe)

             

Lease operating expense

  

$

0.45

 

  

$

0.40

  

$

0.38

Taxes other than income

  

 

0.27

 

  

 

0.31

  

 

0.24

General and Administrative Expense

  

 

0.40

 

  

 

0.38

  

 

0.22

   


  

  

Total production cost

  

$

1.12

 

  

$

1.09

  

$

0.84

Hedging Summary

             

Natural gas prices ($/Mcf):

             

Actual price received for production

  

$

3.39

 

  

$

3.92

  

$

3.95

Effect of derivative hedging activities

  

 

(0.04

)

  

 

0.14

  

 

—  

   


  

  

Average realized price

  

$

3.35

 

  

$

4.06

  

$

3.95

Crude oil prices ($/Bbl):

             

Actual price received for production

  

$

24.39

 

  

$

22.45

  

$

26.84

Effect of derivative hedging activities

  

 

(0.76

)

  

 

0.49

  

 

—  

   


  

  

Average realized price

  

$

23.63

 

  

$

22.94

  

$

26.84

*Production for 2002 does not include approximately 16 Mbbls of oil condensate and 18 MMcf of natural gas production, or 114 MMcfe, related to discontinued operations. 2001 production volumes for properties sold were insignificant.

Page 15


Proved Reserves

We had proved reserves of 71,000241 Bcf of natural gas and 5.4 million barrels of crude oil and condensate and 174 Bcf of natural gas at December 31, 2000.2002. The present value of the estimated future cash flows discounted at 10 percent (Pre-tax(pre-tax SEC PV10 Value) at December 31, 20002002, was $644$481 million. At December 31, 2000, the Company2002, we had 150195 gross (74(128.3 net) proved undeveloped drilling locations. Natural Pre-tax Oil and Natural Gas SEC PV10 Condensate Gas Equivalents Value (Mbbls) (Bcf) (Bcfe) ($MM) 2000 Developed 71 146 147 $540 Undeveloped - 28 28 104 Total 71 174 175 $644 1999 Developed 326 138 140 $116 Undeveloped 33 47 47 20 Total 359 185 187 $136 1998 Developed 313 118 120 $ 73 Undeveloped 28 46 46 8 Total 341 164 166 $ 81

     

Oil and Condensate (MMbbls)


  

Natural Gas (Bcf)


    

Natural Gas Equivalents (Bcfe)


  

Pre-tax SEC PV10Value ($MM)


  

Year-end Weighted Average Prices Used


               

$ / Bbl


  

$ / Mmbtu


2002

                         

Developed

    

2.9

  

199

    

216

  

$

404

        

Undeveloped

    

2.5

  

42

    

57

  

 

77

        
     
  
    
  

        

Total

    

5.4

  

241

    

273

  

$

481

  

$

31.13

  

$

4.74

2001

                         

Developed

    

2.2

  

183

    

196

  

$

202

        

Undeveloped

    

1.7

  

46

    

56

  

 

40

        
     
  
    
  

        

Total

    

3.9

  

229

    

252

  

$

242

  

$

20.40

  

$

2.65

2000

                         

Developed

    

0.1

  

146

    

147

  

$

540

        

Undeveloped

    

—  

  

28

    

28

  

 

104

        
     
  
    
  

        

Total

    

0.1

  

174

    

175

  

$

644

  

$

23.31

  

$

9.91

The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows, which represents the present value of future net revenues after income taxes discounted at ten percent, was $467$355 million, $119$189 million and $76$467 million at December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively. The year-end weighted average prices used to determine proved reserves at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 were ($/Bbl) $23.31, $21.78 and $9.70, respectively, for oil and condensate and ($/Mcf) $9.91, $2.69 and $2.14, respectively, for natural gas. Natural gas prices have declined significantly since December 31, 2000. If the average price received for 2000 ($26.84 per Bbl and $3.95 per Mcf) had been used to calculate the standardized measure at December 31, 2000, the pre-tax discounted future net cash flows would have been $235 million. For information on the changes in standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows, see "Note 17. Supplementaryflows. See Note 22 (Supplementary Information on Oil and Gas Producing Activities (Unaudited)" in "Item 8. -) of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, and Supplementary Data." for more information.

In accordance with the Securities and Exchange Commission'sCommission’s guidelines, the engineers'engineers’ estimates of future net revenues from the Company'sour properties and the pre-tax SEC PV10 value thereof are made using oil and natural gas sales prices in effect at the dateas of such estimates.December 31, 2002. The prices are held constant throughout the life of the properties except where such guidelines permit alternate treatment, including the use of fixed and determinable contractual price escalations. Net proved oil and gas reserves for the three years ended December 31, 20002002 were estimated by Wright and Company, Inc. Prices for oil and gas are subject to substantial seasonal fluctuations and prices for each are subject to substantial fluctuations as a result of numerous other factors. See "ItemItem 7 - Management's– Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations."

Proved reserves are the estimated quantities of natural gas, crude oil and condensate that geological and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be recoverable in future years from known reservoirs under existing economic and operating conditions. Proved developed reserves are proved reserves that can be expected to be recovered through existing wells with existing equipment and operating methods. There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities of proved reserves and in projecting future rates of production and timing of development expenditures, including many factors beyond the control of the Company.our control. Reserve engineering is a subjective process of estimating underground accumulations of oil and natural gas that cannot be measured in an exact manner, and the accuracy of any reserve estimate is a function of the quality of available data and of engineering and geological interpretation and judgement.judgment. The quantities of crude oil and natural gas that are ultimately recovered, production and operating costs, the amount ofand timing of future development expenditures, and future crude oil and natural gas sales prices may all differ from those assumed in these estimates. Therefore, the pre-tax SEC PV10 value amounts shown above should not be construed as the current market value of the estimated oil and natural gas reserves attributable to the Company'sour properties. The information set forth in the foregoing tables includes revisions of certain volumetric reserve estimates attributable to proved properties included in the preceding year'syear’s estimates. Such revisions are the result of additional information from subsequent completions and production history from the

Page 16


properties involved or the result of a decrease (or increase) in the projected economic life of such properties resulting from changes in production prices.

Acreage

The following table sets forth the Company'sour developed and undeveloped acreage at December 31, 2000.2002. The Company's acreage is located in the eastern and southern portions of the United States. Gross Acreage Net Acreage (in thousands) Developed 752 624 Undeveloped 112 47 Total 864 671

   

Gross Acreage


  

Net Acreage


   

(in thousands)

Developed

  

611

  

487

Undeveloped

  

246

  

131

   
  

Total

  

857

  

618

Wells Drilled

The following table sets forth the gross and net number of exploratory and development wells drilled during the last three years. The number of wells drilled meansrefers to the number of wells spud at any time during the respective year. Net wells equal the number of gross wells multiplied by Penn Virginia'sour working interest in each of the gross wells. Productive wells represent either wells which were producing or which were capable of commercial production. 2000 1999 1998 Development Gross Net Gross Net Gross Net Productive 99 75.3 61 38.1 56 37.0 Non-productive 1 0.9 2 2.0 3 3.0 100 76.2 63 40.1 59 40.0 Exploratory Productive 1 0.2 16 9.2 15 8.1 Non-productive 5 1.3 3 1.5 3 1.5 Under evaluation 3 1.4 - - - - 9 2.9 19 10.7 18 9.6 Total 109 79.1 82 50.8 77 49.6

   

2002


  

2001


  

2000


   

Gross


  

Net


  

Gross


  

Net


  

Gross


  

Net


Development

                  

Productive

  

87

  

58.4

  

125

  

96.1

  

99

  

75.3

Non-productive

  

3

  

2.5

  

5

  

5.0

  

1

  

0.9

   
  
  
  
  
  
   

90

  

60.9

  

130

  

101.1

  

100

  

76.2

   
  
  
  
  
  

Exploratory

                  

Productive

  

3

  

3.0

  

19

  

14.5

  

1

  

0.2

Non-productive

  

3

  

1.6

  

5

  

3.5

  

5

  

1.3

Under evaluation

  

—  

  

—  

  

—  

  

—  

  

3

  

1.4

   
  
  
  
  
  
   

6

  

4.6

  

24

  

18.0

  

9

  

2.9

   
  
  
  
  
  

Total

  

96

  

65.5

  

154

  

119.1

  

109

  

79.1

   
  
  
  
  
  

Productive Wells

The number of productive oil and gas wells in which Penn Virginiawe had a working interest at December 31, 20002002 is set forth below. Productive wells are producing wells or wells capable of commercial production. Operated Wells Non-Operated Wells Total Gross Net Gross Net Gross Net Natural gas 476 445 380 51 856 496

Operated Wells


 

Non-Operated Wells


 

Total


Gross


 

Net


 

Gross


 

Net


 

Gross


 

Net


692

 

668

 

430

 

63

 

1,122

 

731

In addition to the above working interest wells, Penn Virginia owns royalty interests in 1,7832,346 gross wells.

Page 17


Coal Royalty and Land Management Penn Virginia's

The Partnership’s coal reserves and timber assets at December 31, 20002002 covered 188,000241,000 acres, including fee and leased acreage,in central Appalachia.Virginia, West Virginia, New Mexico and eastern Kentucky. The coal reserves are in various surface and underground seams. Penn Virginia's mineable

The Partnership’s proven and merchantableprobable coal reserves are estimated at 480615 million tons as of December 31, 2000. Mineable2002. Reserves are coal tons that can be economically extracted or produced at the time of determination considering legal, economic and merchantabletechnical limitations. Proven coal reserves meansare reserves for which (a) the quantity is computed from dimensions revealed in outcrops, trenches, working or drill holes; grade and/or quality are computed from the results of detailed sampling; and (b) the sites for inspection, sampling and measurement are spaced so closely, and the geologic character is so well defined, that the size, shape, and depth and mineral content of reserves are well-established. Probable coal reserves are reserves for which quantity and grade and/or quality are computed from information similar to that used for proven reserves, but the sites for inspection, sampling and measurement are farther apart or are otherwise less adequately spaced. The degree of assurance, although lower than that for proven reserves, is economically mineable using existing equipmenthigh enough to assume continuity between points of observation.

In areas where geologic conditions indicate potential inconsistencies related to coal reserves, the Partnership performs additional drilling to ensure the continuity and methods under federal and state laws nowmineablility of coal reserves. Consequently, sampling in effect. those areas involves drill holes that are spaced closer together than those distances cited above.

Reserve estimates are adjusted annually for production, unmineable areas, acquisitions and sales of coal in place. The majority of the Company'sPVR’s reserves are high in energy content, low in sulfur and suitable for either the steam or metallurgical markets.

The amount of coal a lessee can profitably mine at any given time is subject to several factors and may be substantially different from "mineable“proven and merchantableprobable reserves." Included among the factors that influence profitability are the existing market price, coal quality and operating costs.

The Company'sPartnership’s timber assets consist of various hardwoods, primarily red oak, white oak, yellow poplar and black cherry. At December 31, 2000,2002, the CompanyPartnership owned an estimated 177 million board feet168 MMbf of standing saw timber. Coal Reserves The following table sets forth the coal reserves that are owned and leased by the Company. The reserves are estimated internally by the Company's engineers. 2000 1999 1998 (in million tons) Beginning of year 488.4 384.7 379.8 Production (12.5) (8.6) (5.3) Additions, deletions, revisions 4.1 112.3 10.2 End of year 480.0 488.4 384.7

ITEM 3 - LEGAL–LEGAL PROCEEDINGS The Company is

We are involved in various legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. While the ultimate results of these cannot be predicted with certainty, Company management believes these claims will not have a material effect on the Company'sour financial position, liquidity or operations.

ITEM 4 - SUBMISSION–SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

There were no matters submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of 2000. 2002.

Page 18


PART II

ITEM 5 - MARKET–MARKET FOR THE COMPANY'SCOMPANY’S COMMON STOCK AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Common Stock Market Prices And Dividends

High and low closing stock prices and dividends for the last two years were: 2000 1999 Cash Cash Sales Price Dividends Sales Price Dividends High Low Paid High Low Paid Quarter Ended: March 31 $18.12 $15.81 $0.225 $20.75 $16.69 $0.225 June 30 $26.88 $16.38 $0.225 $21.69 $17.31 $0.225 September 30 $28.94 $21.50 $0.225 $23.06 $20.50 $0.225 December 31 $33.19 $25.56 $0.225 $21.00 $16.13 $0.225

   

2002


  

2001


   

Sales Price


  

Cash Dividends Paid


  

Sales Price


  

Cash Dividends Paid


   

High


  

Low


    

High


  

Low


  

Quarter Ended:

                        

March 31

  

$

40.15

  

$

26.84

  

$

0.225

  

$

37.39

  

$

30.00

  

$

0.225

June 30

  

$

41.87

  

$

32.58

  

$

0.225

  

$

45.10

  

$

31.10

  

$

0.225

September 30

  

$

38.98

  

$

30.30

  

$

0.225

  

$

38.41

  

$

27.15

  

$

0.225

December 31

  

$

36.90

  

$

30.35

  

$

0.225

  

$

38.50

  

$

27.90

  

$

0.225

The Company'sCompany’s common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol PVA.

Page 19


ITEM 6 - SELECTED–SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

Five Year Selected Financial Data

Year Ended December 31,

  

2002


  

2001


  

2000


  

1999


  

1998


   

(in thousands except share data)

Revenues

  

$

110,957

  

$

96,571

  

$

105,998

  

$

47,697

  

$

38,324

Operating income (a,b)

  

$

30,791

  

$

1,563

  

$

65,684

  

$

20,715

  

$

10,273

Net income (c)

  

$

12,104

  

$

34,337

  

$

39,265

  

$

14,504

  

$

9,591

Per common share:

                    

Net income, basic

  

$

1.35

  

$

3.92

  

$

4.76

  

$

1.73

  

$

1.15

Net income, diluted

  

$

1.34

  

$

3.86

  

$

4.69

  

$

1.71

  

$

1.13

Dividends paid

  

$

0.90

  

$

0.90

  

$

0.90

  

$

0.90

  

$

0.90

Weighted average shares outstanding, basic

  

 

8,930

  

 

8,770

  

 

8,241

  

 

8,406

  

 

8,310

Weighted average shares outstanding, diluted

  

 

8,974

  

 

8,896

  

 

8,371

  

 

8,480

  

 

8,463

Total assets (d)

  

$

586,292

  

$

457,102

  

$

268,766

  

$

274,011

  

$

256,931

Long-term debt(e)

  

$

106,887

  

$

46,887

  

$

47,500

  

$

78,475

  

$

37,967

Minority interest in PVR

  

$

192,770

  

$

144,039

  

$

—  

  

$

—  

  

$

—  

Shareholders’ equity

  

$

187,956

  

$

185,454

  

$

171,162

  

$

154,343

  

$

170,259

Year Ended December 31,
(a)Certain reclassifications have been made to conform to the current year presentation.
(b)Operating income in 2002 includes a $0.8 million impairment on oil and gas properties. Operating income in 2001 included a $33.6 million impairment on oil and gas properties. Operating income in 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 (in thousands except per share data) Revenues (a) $81,203 $47,417 $38,252 $39,421 $34,104 Operating Income 40,841 20,435 10,201 16,745 13,194 Net Income (b) 39,265 14,504 9,591 16,018 13,040 Per Common share: included a $23.9 million gain on the sale of certain oil and gas properties.
(c)Net income basic $4.76 $1.73 $1.15 $1.93 $1.51 Net income, diluted $4.69 1.71 1.13 1.88 1.50 Dividends paid $0.90 $0.90 $0.90 $0.90 $0.90 Weighted average shares 8,241 8,406 8,310 8,302 8,694 outstanding, basic Weighted average shares 8,371 8,480 8,463 8,500 8,694 outstanding, diluted in 2001 included a $54.7 million ($35.6 million after tax) gain on the sale of Norfolk Southern Corporation common stock.
(d)Total assets $268,766 $274,011 $256,931 $247,230 $229,514 reflect the acquisition of coal reserves from Peabody in December 2002 for $130.5 million. Total assets in 2001 include the Gulf Coast oil and gas properties of $157.1 million that were purchased in July 2001.
(e)Long-term debt $47,500 $ 78,475 $37,967 $31,903 $21,233 Shareholders'equity $171,162 $154,343 $170,259 $163,704 $160,211 in 2002 includes PVA outstanding borrowing of $16 million on its revolving credit facility. Also included is PVR outstanding borrowings of $90.9 million consisting of $47.5 million borrowed against its $50 million revolving credit facility and $43.3 million of a fully-drawn term loan. Long-term debt in 2001 included $43.4 of long-term debt of PVR that was secured by $43.4 million of U.S. Treasuries also held by PVR.
(a) Certain reclassifications have been made to conform to the current year presentation. (b) Net income in 2000 included a $23.9 million ($14.2 million after tax) gain on the sale of certain oil and gas properties. SUMMARIZED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA Quarterly financial data for 2000 and 1999 were as follows: 2000 1999 Quarters Ended Quarters Ended (in thousands, except per share data) Mar31 June30 Sept30 Dec31(b) Mar31 June30 Sept30 Dec 31 Revenues (c) $16,574 $19,277 $21,359 $23,993 $9,561 $10,515 $12,393 $14,948 Operating Income 8,273 10,223 11,454 10,891 3,835 4,042 5,430 7,128 Net income $5,343 $6,182 $7,202 $20,538 $2,915 $3,165 3,945 $4,479 Net income per share (a) Basic $ 0.65 $0.75 $0.88 $2.46 $0.35 $0.38 $0.47 0.53 Diluted $ 0.65 $0.74 $0.85 $2.38 $0.35 $0.37 $0.46 0.53 Weighted average shares outstanding: Basic 8,222 8,193 8,213 8,353 8,371 8,410 8,423 8,423 Diluted 8,222 8,325 8,473 8,622 8,448 8,490 8,532 8,445
(a) The sum of the quarters may not equal the total of the respective year's net income per share due to changes in the weighted average shares outstanding throughout the year. (b) Net income for fourth quarter of 2000 included a $23.9 million ($14.2 million after tax) gain on the sale of certain oil and gas properties. (c) Certain reclassifications have been made to conform to the current year presentation.

Page 20


ITEM 7 - MANAGEMENT'S–MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following review of operations and financial condition of Penn Virginia Corporation and subsidiaries should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto.

Overview

Penn Virginia's net incomeVirginia Corporation (“Penn Virginia” or the “Company”) is an independent energy company that is engaged in two primary business segments. Our oil and gas segment explores for, 2000 was $39.3 million or $4.69 per share (diluted) with operating income of $40.8 milliondevelops and revenues of $81.2 million. The comparable 1999 results were net income of $14.5 million or $1.71 per share (diluted), operating income of $20.4 millionproduces crude oil, condensate and revenues of $47.4 million. The results for 2000 reflected the sale of non-strategic natural gas properties located primarily in Kentuckythe eastern and West Virginia. ExcludingGulf Coast onshore areas of the $23.9 million ($14.2 million after tax) gain onUnited States. Our coal royalty and land management segment operates through our ownership in Penn Virginia Resource Partners, L.P. (the “Partnership” or “PVR”), a Delaware limited partnership, see Note 2 (Penn Virginia Resource Partners, L.P.) of the sale, net income would have been $25.1 million for 2000,Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

We are committed to increasing value to our shareholders by conducting a 73balanced program of investment in our two business segments. In the oil and gas segment, we intend to execute a program combining relatively low risk, moderate return development drilling in the east with higher risk, higher return exploration and development drilling in the onshore Gulf Coast, supplemented periodically with acquisitions. In addition to our continuing development program, we are expanding our eastern presence by developing coalbed methane gas reserves in Appalachia. By employing horizontal drilling techniques, we expect to increase production rates from coalbed methane reserves we own. We are also committed to expanding our onshore Gulf Coast reserves and production internally through our drilling program and by acquiring reserves with favorable return potential.

In 2002, these efforts resulted in a 47 percent increase over 1999. The 2000 increases were a direct result ofin oil and gas production from 2001, and we expect an increase in price the Company received for its natural2003 oil and gas production and anof at least 30 percent, with a corresponding increase in production attributableoperating cash flow. In January 2003, we completed an acquisition of approximately 31.8 Bcfe of proved reserves in the South Texas area of the onshore Gulf Coast region for $32.5 million, which will provide a significant part of the expected growth in 2003 production.

Our oil and gas capital expenditures for 2003, including the January 2003 South Texas acquisition, are expected to be $110 to $120 million. Borrowings against our $140 million credit facility were $16 million as of December 31, 2002, and we expect to fund our 2003 capital expenditures with a combination of internal cash flow and credit facility borrowings.

During 2002, PVR completed its first two coal reserve acquisitions since its initial public offering in October 2001. In December 2002, PVR announced the formation of a strategic alliance with Peabody, resulting from the purchase from and leaseback to Peabody of approximately 120 million tons of coal reserves in New Mexico and northern West Virginia for $72.5 million in cash and a total of 2.76 million common units and Class B common units. The Peabody Acquisition significantly expanded PVR’s geographic diversity and included incentives for Peabody to source additional assets to the acquisitionPartnership in the future. In August 2002, PVR also purchased approximately 16 million tons of certain naturalcoal reserves in northern West Virginia for $12.0 million. The two acquisitions are expected to contribute 12.3 million to 12.9 million tons of production and $16.5 million to $17.5 million of cash flow from operations to PVR in 2003.

Coal-related capital expenditures in 2003 are expected to be $3.0 to $3.3 million for the construction of new coal service-related projects for which PVR will collect a fee. As of December 31, 2002, PVR had borrowed $90.9 million against its credit facility, and it is currently attempting to refinance those borrowings with a more permanent form of debt. The Partnership expects to complete the refinancing during the first quarter of 2003. Cash flow from operations, supplemented with credit facility borrowings, are expected to be adequate for PVR to fund 2003 capital expenditures and distributions to unitholders.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Oil and Gas Properties.We use the successful efforts method of accounting for our oil and gas operations. Under this method of accounting, costs to acquire mineral interests in oil and gas properties and to drill and equip development wells (including development dry holes) are capitalized and amortized on a unit-of-production basis over the remaining life of proved developed reserves and proved reserves, respectively. Costs of drilling exploratory wells are initially capitalized, and later charged to expense upon determination that the well does not justify commercial development. Other exploratory costs, including annual delay rentals and geological and geophysical costs, are charged to expense when incurred.

Page 21


The costs of unproved leaseholds are capitalized pending the results of exploration efforts. Unproved leasehold costs are assessed periodically, on a property-by-property basis, and a loss is recognized to the extent, if any, the cost of the property has been impaired. As unproved leaseholds are determined to be productive, the related costs are transferred to proved leaseholds. As of December 31, 2002, we had approximately $57.6 million of unproved leasehold costs included in Mississippi, West Virginiaoil and Kentucky as well as higher levelsgas properties on our consolidated balance sheet. We expect to complete an evaluation of coal royalties. Management is committed to expanding its natural gas operationsour unproved leaseholds over the next several years through a combination of exploitationtwo to three years.

Other Property and explorationEquipment.Other property and equipment is carried at cost and includes expenditures for additions and improvements, which substantially increase the productive lives of existing assets. Maintenance and repair costs are expensed as incurred. Depreciation of property and equipment is generally computed using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives, varying from 3 years to 20 years. Coal properties are depleted on an area-by-area basis at a rate based upon the cost of the mineral properties and acquisitionsestimated proven and probable tonnage therein. When an asset is retired or sold, its cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts. The difference between undepreciated cost and proceeds from disposition is recorded as a gain or loss.

Impairment of new properties. During 2000, the Company acquired naturalLong-Lived Assets.We review our long-lived assets to be held and used, including proved oil and gas properties in West Virginia and eastern Kentucky at a costthe Partnership’s coal properties, whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of $34.7 million. At December 31, 2000,those assets may not be recoverable. An impairment loss must be recognized when the properties hadcarrying amount of an asset exceeds the sum of the undiscounted estimated future cash flows. In this circumstance, we would recognize an impairment loss equal to the difference between the carrying value and the fair value of the asset. Fair value is estimated to be the expected present value of future net cash flows from proved reserves, of approximately 33 billion cubic feet (Bcf) in addition to significant drilling potential. The Company continued to develop the property it acquired in July 1999 in Mississippi for $13.7 million by drilling 41 gross wells (37.7 net) in 2000. The acquisition, which was 99 percent natural gas, added 23.3 Bcfe in proved reserves and provided numerous future drilling locations. The Company drilled seven gross (1.4 net) exploratory wells indiscounted utilizing a Texas onshore gulf coast exploration project, of which one gross (0.2 net) well was successful, four gross (0.8 net) wells were non-productive and two gross (0.4 net) wells are under evaluation. The Company is still evaluating the unproved properties associatedrisk-free interest rate commensurate with the 20 percent working interest inremaining lives for the project. Historically, Penn Virginia has focused most of its operations in the eastern United Statesrespective oil and particularly in Appalachia. However, the Company believes continued growth opportunities, especially ingas properties.

Oil and Gas Revenues.Oil and gas sales revenues are recognized when crude oil and natural gas volumes are produced and sold for our account. Each working interest owner in a well generally has the right to a specific percentage of production, and often actual production sold for any particular owner will be enhanceddiffer from such owner’s ownership percentage. When, under contract terms, these differences are settled in cash, revenues are adjusted accordingly.

Coal Royalties. Coal royalty revenues are recognized on the basis of tons of coal sold by a presence outside the Appalachian Basin. The Company continued its ambitious drilling program in 2000 by drilling 109 gross (79.1 net) wells. In 2000, Penn Virginia produced a record 11.8 Bcfe of oilPartnership’s lessees and natural gas, which was a 33 percent increase over 1999. Penn Virginia participates in the coal industry exclusively through its royalty ownership. The Companycorresponding revenue from those sales. Coal leases the rights to mine its coal reserves to various operators who pay aother than those with Peabody affiliates are based on minimum monthly or annual payment,payments, a minimum dollar royalty per ton and/or a percentage of the gross sales price. SincePeabody leases are leased on fixed royalties which escalate annually and also provide for minimum monthly payments.

Coal Services.Coal services revenues are recognized when lessees use the CompanyPartnership’s facilities for the processing and transportation of coal. Coal services revenues consist of fees collected from the Partnership’s lessees for the use of the Partnership’s loadout facility, coal preparation plant, dock loading facility.

Timber.Timber revenues are recognized as timber is sold on a contract basis where independent contractors harvest and sell the timber and, from time to time, in a competitive bid process involving sales of standing timber on individual parcels. Title and risk of loss pass to the independent contractors upon the execution of the contract. In addition, if the contractors do not harvest the timber within the specified time period, the title of the timber reverts back to the Partnership with no refund of original payment.

Minimum Rentals. Most of the Partnership’s lessees must make minimum monthly or annual payments that are generally recoupable over certain time periods. These minimum payments are recorded as deferred income. If the lessee recoups a minimum payment through production, the deferred income attributable to the minimum payment is recognized as coal royalty revenues. If a lessee fails to meet its minimum production for certain pre-determined time periods (the recoupment period), the deferred income attributable to the minimum payment is recognized as minimum rental revenues. Revenues associated with minimum rentals are included in other revenues.

Price Risk Management Activities.From time to time, we enter into derivative financial instruments to mitigate our exposure to natural gas and crude oil price volatility. The derivative financial instruments, which are placed with major financial institutions that we believe are minimum credit risks, take the form of costless collars and swaps. All derivative instruments are recorded on the balance sheet at fair value. If the derivative does not minequalify as a hedge or is not designated as a hedge, the coal,gain or loss on the coal royaltyderivative is recognized currently in earnings. To qualify for hedge accounting, the derivative must qualify either as a fair value hedge, cash flow hedge or foreign currency hedge. Currently, we are utilizing only cash flow hedges and landthe remaining discussion will relate exclusively to this type of derivative instrument. All hedge transactions are subject to our risk management segmentpolicy, which has relatively high margins. Coal royaltybeen reviewed and land management segmentapproved by the Board of Directors. We formally document all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as its risk-management objective and strategy for undertaking various hedge transactions. This process includes linking

Page 22


all derivatives that are designated as cash flow hedges to forecasted transactions. We also formally assess, both at inception of the hedge and on an ongoing basis, whether the derivatives that are used in hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in cash flows of hedged transactions. We measure hedge effectiveness on a period basis. When it is determined that a derivative is not highly effective as a hedge, or that it has ceased to be a highly effective hedge, we discontinue hedge accounting prospectively. When hedge accounting is discontinued because it is probable that a forecasted transaction will not occur, the derivative will continue to be carried on the balance sheet at its fair value, and gains and losses that were accumulated in other comprehensive income will be recognized in earnings immediately. In all other situations in which hedge accounting is discontinued, the derivative will be carried at its fair value on the balance sheet, with changes in its fair value recognized in earnings prospectively. Gains and losses on hedging instruments when settled are included in natural gas or crude oil production revenues increased $9.8in the period that the related production is delivered. The fair values of our hedging instruments are determined based on third party forward price quotes for NYMEX Henry Hub and West Texas Intermediate closing prices.

Reserves.There are many uncertainties inherent in estimating crude oil and natural gas reserve quantities, projecting future production rates and projecting the timing of future development expenditures. In addition, reserve estimates of new discoveries are more imprecise than those of properties with a production history. Accordingly, these estimates are subject to change as additional information becomes available. Proved reserves are the estimated quantities of crude oil, condensate and natural gas that geological and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be recoverable in future years from known reservoirs under existing economic and operating conditions at the end of the respective years. Proved developed reserves are those reserves expected to be recovered through existing equipment and operating methods.

Results of Operations

Selected Financial Data – Consolidated

   

2002


  

2001


  

2000


   

(in millions, except share data)

Revenues

  

$

111.0

  

$

96.6

  

$

106.0

Operating costs and expenses

  

 

80.2

  

 

95.0

  

 

40.3

Operating income

  

 

30.8

  

 

1.6

  

 

65.7

Net income

  

 

12.1

  

 

34.3

  

 

39.3

Net income per share, basic

  

 

1.35

  

 

3.92

  

 

4.76

Net income per share, diluted

  

 

1.34

  

 

3.86

  

 

4.69

Cash flows provided by operating activities

  

 

65.8

  

 

44.2

  

 

41.7

Consolidated Net Income

Our 2002 net income was $12.1 million, or 45 percent, to an all- time high of $31.9compared with $34.3 million in 2001 and $39.3 million in 2000. The increase was attributable to acquisitions, enhanced production from lessees due to the completion of the unit train loadout facility and start-up operations from other lessees. The Company continues to diversify its coal customer base by adding additional lessees and by searchingRevenues for additional coal reserve acquisition opportunities. The Company had its first full year of usage for the $5.2 million state-of-the-art coal loadout facility in Virginia completed in April 1999. The facility accommodates 100 rail car unit trains which can be loaded in approximately four hours, thus generating substantial savings for the Company's lessees. The loadout is primarily utilized by the Company's lessees and provides them a competitive advantage by reducing delivery costs to their principal customers. The loadout facility transshipped 2.5 million tons in 2000, generating $1.9 million in fees. Additionally, the loadout facility has accelerated the cash flow received by the Company, primarily due to increased production from lessees. Other infrastructure projects are underway or being evaluated. In September 1999, Penn Virginia completed a $30 million acquisition which included over 90 million tons of high quality coal reserves, as well as oil and gas leases, timber assets, a short line railroad and a coal loading dock on the Kanawha River. The acquisition covers over 24,000 acres and complements the existing asset base of the Company's Coal River Properties in West Virginia. At December 31, 2000, the Company owned 3,307,200 shares of Norfolk Southern common stock, which decreased in price from $20.50 per share at December 31, 1999 to $13.31 per share, reducing the value of the investment by $23.7 million, or $15.4 million after tax. Penn Virginia received a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share in 2000, 1999 and 1998; however, in January 2001, Norfolk Southern Corporation reduced its quarterly dividend to $0.06 per share. Results of Operations Consolidated Net Income Penn Virginia's 2000 net income was $39.32002 were $111.0 million, compared with $14.5$96.6 million and $106.0 million in 19992001 and $9.6 million in 1998. Revenues for 2000, were $81.2 million,respectively.

The 2001 results included a 71 percent increase over 1999 and a 112 percent increase over 1998. Significant factors for the increase in 2000 include (a) increased natural gas production resulting from an acquisition in May 2000, (b) a substantial increase the average price received for natural gas and (c) higher levels of coal royalties and fees received in connection with the coal loading facility. In addition, apre-tax gain of $23.9 million ($14.2 million after tax) was recognized in December 2000 foron the sale of mature oil and gas properties located primarilysecurities of approximately $54.7 million ($35.5 million after tax). Also included in Kentucky and West Virginia. The increase in net income for 1999the 2001 results was a direct result of increased production of natural gas and higher levels of coal royalties. Net income for 1998 included a non-cash charge relating to impairmentsthe impairment of certain oil and gas properties, of $4.6for which we recorded a $33.6 million ($3.721.8 million after tax) impairment charge. In addition to the gain on sale of securities, net of the impairment charge noted above, the decrease in 2002 net income from 2001 was primarily due to a decline in commoditylower natural gas prices and the minority interest resulting from the ownership change of our coal reserves in connection with the initial public offering of the Partnership’s common units in the fourth quarter of 2001.

In 2000, we recorded a restructuring charge of $0.6 million ($0.4 million after tax). Net income includes apre-tax gain of approximately $23.9 million ($14.215.5 million after tax) on the sale of non-strategic oil andnatural gas properties located in December 2000. Selected Financial Data 2000 1999 1998 (in millions, except share data) Revenues $81.2 $47.4 $38.3 Operating costs and expenses 40.4 27.0 28.1 Operating income 40.8 20.4 10.2 Net income 39.3 14.5 9.6 Earnings per share, basic 4.76 1.73 1.15 Earnings per share, diluted 4.69 1.71 1.13
Certain reclassifications have been madeKentucky and West Virginia. The decrease in 2001 net income from 2000 was primarily due to conformincreased exploration, operating and general and administrative expenses as a result of the acquisition of Gulf Coast properties in 2001.

Corporate and Other

Dividends. In April 2001, we sold 3.3 million shares of common stock of Norfolk Southern Corporation at an average selling price of $17.39 per share. Proceeds, net of commissions, totaled approximately $57.4 million. As a result, dividend income decreased from $2.6 million in 2000 to the current year presentation. $0.2 million in 2001. No dividends were received during 2002.

Page 23


Oil and Gas Segment The

In our oil and gas segment, exploreswe explore for, developsdevelop and producesproduce crude oil and natural gas in the eastern and southern portionsGulf Coast onshore regions of the United States. The Company also owns mineral rights to

We use the successful efforts method of accounting for our oil and gas reserves. Selected Financial and Operating Data 2000 1999 1998 (in thousands, except as noted) Revenues Oil and condensate $ 832 $ 463 $ 335 Natural gas 46,019 21,384 20,482 Other 656 1,095 289 Total Revenues 47,507 22,942 21,106 Expenses Lease operating expenses 4,562 4,090 3,761 Exploration expenses 5,080 1,699 488 Taxes other than income 2,809 2,165 2,343 General and administrative 2,656 2,148 3,153 Cash Operating Expenses 15,107 10,102 9,745 Depreciation, depletion and amortization 9,883 6,951 6,460 Impairment of properties - - 4,641 Total Operating Expenses 24,990 17,053 20,846 Operating Income $22,517 $5,889 $ 260 Production Oil and condensate (MBbls) 31 32 30 Natural gas (MMcf) 11,645 8,679 8,056 Prices Oil and condensate ($/Bbl) $26.84 $14.47 $11.17 Natural gas ($/Mcf) 3.95 2.46 2.54 Production cost Operating cost per Mcfe $0.38 $0.46 $0.46 Production taxes per Mcfe 0.24 0.25 0.28 Total production cost per Mcfe $0.62 $0.71 $0.74 Hedging Summary Natural gas prices ($/Mcf): Actual price received for production $3.95 $2.50 $2.61 Effect of derivative hedging activities - (.04) (.07) Average price $3.95 $ 2.46 $2.54
operations. Under this method of accounting, costs to acquire mineral interests in oil and gas properties and to drill and equip development wells (including development dry holes) are capitalized and amortized on a unit-of-production basis over the remaining life of proved developed reserves and proved reserves, respectively. Costs of drilling exploratory wells are initially capitalized, and later charged to expense upon determination that the well does not justify commercial development. Other exploratory costs, including annual delay rentals and geological and geophysical costs, are charged to expense when incurred.

The costs of unproved leaseholds are capitalized pending the results of exploration efforts. Unproved leasehold costs are assessed periodically, on a property-by-property basis, and a loss is recognized to the extent, if any, the cost of the property has been impaired. As unproved leaseholds are determined to be productive, the related costs are transferred to proved leaseholds.

Oil and natural gas revenues are generally recorded using the entitlement method in which we recognize our ownership interest in the production as revenue. Each working interest owner in a well generally has the right to a specific percentage of production, although actual production sold may differ from an ownership percentage. Using entitlement accounting, a receivable is recorded when sales are less than our entitlement and deferred revenue is recognized when sales are greater than our entitlement.

We review our long-lived assets, including proved oil and natural gas properties, for possible impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of those assets may not be recoverable. An impairment loss must be recognized when the carrying amount of an asset exceeds the sum of the undiscounted estimated future cash flows. In this circumstance, we would recognize an impairment loss equal to the difference between the carrying value and the fair value of the asset. Fair value is estimated using the expected present value of future net cash flows from proved reserves, utilizing a risk-free interest rate.

Our revenues, profitability and future rate of growth are highly dependent on the prevailing prices for oil and natural gas, which are affected by numerous factors that are generally beyond the Company’s control. Crude oil prices are generally determined by global supply and demand. Natural gas prices are influenced by national and regional supply and demand. A substantial or extended decline in the prices of oil or natural gas could have a material adverse effect on our revenues, profitability and cash flow and could, under certain circumstances, result in an impairment of our oil and natural gas properties.

Our future profitability and growth is also highly dependent on the results of our exploratory and development drilling programs.

Page 24


Selected Financial and Operating Data – Oil and Gas

   

2002


   

2001


   

2000


   

(in thousands, except as noted)

Revenues

              

Oil and condensate

  

$

8,246

 

  

$

3,762

 

  

$

832

Natural gas

  

$

62,552

 

  

 

53,263

 

  

 

46,019

Other

  

 

714

 

  

 

753

 

  

 

24,554

   


  


  

Total Revenues

  

$

71,512

 

  

$

57,778

 

  

$

71,405

Expenses

              

Lease operating

  

 

9,253

 

  

 

5,631

 

  

 

4,562

Exploration

  

 

7,549

 

  

 

11,514

 

  

 

5,080

Taxes other than income

  

 

5,618

 

  

 

4,439

 

  

 

2,809

General and administrative

  

 

8,381

 

  

 

5,330

 

  

 

2,656

   


  


  

Operating expenses before non-cash charges

  

 

30,801

 

  

 

26,914

 

  

 

15,107

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

  

 

26,336

 

  

 

16,418

 

  

 

9,883

Impairment of properties

  

 

796

 

  

 

33,583

 

  

 

—  

   


  


  

Total Operating Expenses

  

 

57,933

 

  

 

76,915

 

  

 

24,990

   


  


  

Operating Income (Loss)

  

$

13,579

 

  

$

(19,137

)

  

$

46,415

   


  


  

Production

              

Oil and condensate (Mbbls) *

  

 

349

 

  

 

164

 

  

 

31

Natural gas (MMcf) *

  

 

18,697

 

  

 

13,130

 

  

 

11,645

Total production (MMcfe) *

  

 

20,791

 

  

 

14,114

 

  

 

11,831

Realized prices

              

Oil and condensate ($/Bbl)

  

$

23.63

 

  

$

22.94

 

  

$

26.84

Natural gas ($/Mcf)

  

 

3.35

 

  

 

4.06

 

  

 

3.95

Production cost ($/Mcfe)

              

Lease operating expense

  

$

0.45

 

  

$

0.40

 

  

$

0.38

Taxes other than income

  

 

0.27

 

  

 

0.31

 

  

 

0.24

General and administrative expense

  

 

0.40

 

  

 

0.38

 

  

 

0.22

   


  


  

Total production cost

  

$

1.12

 

  

$

1.09

 

  

$

0.84

Hedging Summary

              

Natural gas prices ($/Mcf):

              

Actual price received for production

  

$

3.39

 

  

$

3.92

 

  

 

3.95

Effect of hedging activities

  

 

(0.04

)

  

 

0.14

 

  

 

—  

   


  


  

Average realized price

  

$

3.35

 

  

$

4.06

 

  

$

3.95

Crude oil prices ($/Bbl):

              

Actual price received for production

  

$

24.39

 

  

$

22.45

 

  

$

26.84

Effect of hedging activities

  

 

(0.76

)

  

 

0.49

 

  

 

—  

   


  


  

Average realized price

  

$

23.63

 

  

$

22.94

 

  

$

26.84

* Production for 2002 does not include 16 Mbbls of oil and condensate and 18 MMcf of natural gas production, or 114 MMcfe, related to discontinued operations. 2001 production volumes for properties sold were insignificant.

Page 25


Year Ended December 31, 20002002 Compared to Year Ended December 31,1999 31, 2001

Revenues.Oil and gas revenues increased $24.6$13.7 million to $47.5$71.5 million in 20002002 from 19992001 primarily due to a $24.6 millionan increase in natural gas sales. Natural gas sales increased 115 percent to a record $46.0 million due to a 34 percent increase in production coupled with a 61 percent increase in the average price received per Mcf. The Company's $34.7 million acquisition of mineral interests in May 2000 represents 1,111 MMcf of the 2,966 MMcf increase incrude oil and natural gas production.

Crude oil and natural gas production increased to 20.8 Bcfe in 2002, a 47 percent increase over 2001. The developmentincrease was primarily due to the inclusion of Penn Virginia's $13.7 million acquisitiona full year of production from the Gulf Coast oil and gas properties acquired in July 1999 accounted for 1,511 of the increase with the remainder attributable to2001 and development drilling success in Appalachia. Naturalconnection with our Gulf Coast, Mississippi and Appalachian assets. Approximately 90 percent of our 2002 production was natural gas.

The average natural gas price received during 2002 was $3.35 per Mcf compared with $4.06 per Mcf in 2001, a 17 percent decrease. The average oil price received was $23.63 per barrel for 2002, up three percent from $22.94 per barrel in 2001.

Due to the volatility of crude oil and natural gas prices, were extremely volatile in 2000. In April and May of 2000, the Company entered into several physical contracts that totaled 9,289 MMcf per day for the remainder of 2000. The volumes under contract accounted for 20 percent of Penn Virginia's 2000 production at a price of $3.39 per Mcf. The Company had one contract remaining that expires in March 2001 covering 18 percent of anticipated first quarter production at $3.12 per Mcf. The Company, from time to time, hedgeswe sometimes hedge the price received for market-sensitive productionsales volumes through the use of swaps with purchased options.and costless collars. Gains and losses from hedging activities are included in natural gas revenues when the hedged production occurs. The CompanyWe recognized a loss on settled hedging activities of $0.4$1.0 million in 19992002 and $0.7a gain of $1.9 million in 19982001.

Operating expenses. Production costs increased from $5.6 million in 2001 to $9.3 million in 2002. The increase was primarily attributable to the full year impact of operating costs related to our acquisition of certain Gulf Coast oil and gas properties in late July of 2001.

Exploration expenses decreased from $11.5 million in 2001 to $7.5 million in 2002 due to lower exploratory dry hole costs incurred this year. Seismic expenditures were $4.7 million in 2002, up from $2.2 million in 2001. The impact of these higher costs was offset by reduced write-offs of unproved property in 2002.

Taxes other than income taxes increased by $1.2 million to $5.6 million in 2002. The increased taxes were a result of the higher production and revenue levels in 2002.

General and administrative (“G&A”) expenses increased to $8.4 million in 2002 from $5.3 million in 2001. The increase was primarily attributable to our acquisition of the Gulf Coast oil and gas properties in July 2001 and related personnel expenses.

Oil and gas depreciation, depletion and amortization (“DD&A”) increased to $26.3 million in 2002 from $16.4 million in 2001. This increase was primarily due to increased production related to the Gulf Coast assets acquired in July 2001, as well as increased DD&A rates due to changes in reserve estimates and capital additions.

Year Ended December 31, 2001 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2000

Revenues.Oil and gas revenues increased $10.2 million to $57.0 million in 2001 from 2000 primarily due to an increase in crude oil and natural gas production.

Crude oil and natural gas sales combined increased 22 percent to $57.0 million due to a 19 percent increase in production. The increase was primarily due to production related to our acquisition of certain Gulf Coast oil and gas properties in July 2001 and to increased production from the Gwinville Field, offset in part by production lost from properties disposed of in the fourth quarter of 2000. Approximately 93 percent of our 2001 production was natural gas. The average natural gas price received during 2001 was $4.06 per Mcf compared with $3.95 per Mcf in 2000, a three percent increase. The average oil price received was $22.94 per barrel for 2001, down 15 percent from $26.84 per barrel in 2000. We recognized a gain of $1.9 million in 2001 on hedging activities with no gain or loss recognized in 2000. Effective January 1, 2001, the Company will account for its derivative activities in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 133, as amended by SFAS No. 137 and SFAS No. 138. See Note 2 (New Accounting Standards) in the financial statements.

Operating expenses. Production costs, consisting of lease operating expense and taxes other than income, increased from $6.3 million in 1999 to $7.4 million in 2000.2000 to $10.0 million in 2001. Production costs decreasedincreased from $0.62 per Mcfe in 2000 to $0.71 per Mcfe in 1999 to $0.62 per Mcfe in 2000. A decrease, on a Mcfe basis, of $0.06 resulted from the Company's May 2000 acquisition of royalty interest for $34.7 million.2001. The remainder of the decrease isincrease was primarily attributable to the low operating costs associated with the increased production from the Company's 1999 acquiredacquisition of certain Gulf Coast oil and gas properties in Mississippi. These decreases, on a Mcfe basis, were offset by an increase in severance taxes related to increased average prices received in 2000. July 2001.

Exploration expenses increased from $1.7 million in 1999 to $5.1 million in 2000. The $5.1 million in 2000 consiststo $11.5 million in 2001. The $11.5 million in 2001 consisted of $1.7$2.4 million in seismic expenditures, charges relating to five gross (1.3(3.5 net) nonproductive exploratory wells and the impairment of unproved leasehold costs. Penn Virginia'sOur increased seismic expenditures for the year, compared with $0.31.7 million in 1999, represents2000, represented a continued effort to establish the Company'sa balanced exploratory program. General and administrative ("

Page 26


G&A")&A expenses increased to $5.3 million in 2001 from $2.7 million in 2000 from $2.1 million in 1999; however, G&A expenses decreased to $0.22 per Mcfe in 2000 from $0.24 Mcfe in 1999.2000. The decrease of $0.02 per Mcfe isincrease was attributable to increased production from acquisitions and an accelerated drilling program, offset by additional staffing necessary to accomplish those objectives. Oil and gas depreciation, depletion and amortization increased to $9.9 million, or $0.84 per Mcfe, in 2000 from $7.0 million, or $0.78 per Mcfe, in 1999. The increase is primarily to the Company's acquisitions in July 1999 and May 2000. Other non-operating income. Gain on the saleacquisition of properties includes $23.9 million ($14.2 million after tax) related to the sale of mature oil and gas properties located primarily in Kentucky and West Virginia. Proceeds from the December 2000 sale totaled $54.3 million, after closing adjustments. Year Ended December 31, 1999 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 1998 Revenues. Oil and gas revenues increased $1.9 million, or nine percent, from 1998 to 1999 primarily due to a $0.8 million increase in natural gas sales and a $0.8 million increase in other income. Natural gas production increased eight percent, offset by a three percent decrease in average price per Mcf. The production increase is a result of an acquisition in Mississippi and the Company's 1999 drilling program. Other operating income increased $0.8 million primarily due to $0.4 million received for the final settlement of a 1995 contract dispute and $0.2 million for reimbursement of lost production caused by third party pipeline damages. Operating expenses. Production costs, consisting of lease operating expense and taxes other than income, increased from $6.1 million in 1998 to $6.3 million in 1999. On a Mcfe basis, production costs decreased from $0.74 per Mcfe in 1998 to $0.71 per Mcfe in 1999. The decrease on a Mcfe basis resulted from less tax being paid due to the relocation of the offices of the oil and gas segment. Exploration expenses increased from $0.5 million in 1998 to $1.7 million in 1999. The increase is attributable to charges relating to seven gross (3.5 net) nonproductive, exploratory wells and preliminary field costs incurred in 1999. Additionally, the Company's exploration program included $0.3 million in seismic expenditures. General and administrative expenses decreased from $3.2 million in 1998 to $2.1 million in 1999. The decrease primarily relates to the Company's 1998 plan to reduce administrative and operational overhead costs in its oil and gas subsidiary. In connection with the plan, the Company recorded a pre-tax charge to general and administrative expense totaling $0.6 million in 1998 related to severance costs for six employees and a lease cancellation penalty. The Company completed its restructuring plan in August 1999. There were no adjustments to the liability recorded in 1998 that resulted in an adjustment to net income in 1999. Oil and gas depreciation, depletion and amortization increased to $7.0 million in 1999 but remained relatively constant on a unit basis at $0.79 per Mcfe in 1999, compared with $6.4 million, or $0.78 per Mcfe, in 1998. Impairment of oil and gas properties. In accordance with SFAS No. 121, the Company reviews its oil and gas properties for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate a decline in the recoverability of their carrying value. In the fourth quarter of 1998, the Company estimated the expected future cash flows of its oil and gas properties and compared such future cash flows to the carrying amount of the oil and gas properties to determine if the carrying amount was recoverable. For those oil and gas properties which the carrying amount exceeded the estimated undiscounted future cash flows, an impairment was determined to exist; thus, the Company adjusted the carrying amount of the respective oil and gas properties to their fair value as determined by discounting their estimated future cash flows. The factors used to determine fair value included, but were not limited to, estimates of proved reserves, future commodity pricing, future production estimates, anticipated capital expenditures and a discount rate commensurate with a risk- adjusted rate of return. As a result, the Company recognized a noncash pre-tax charge of $4.6 million ($3.7 million after tax) related to itscertain Gulf Coast oil and gas properties in late July of 2001 and related personnel expenses.

Oil and gas DD&A increased to $16.4 million in 2000 from $9.9 million in 2000. This increase was primarily due to increased production and a higher cost basis in the producing assets. The acquisition of certain Gulf Coast oil and gas properties in July 2001 was completed when crude oil and natural gas future prices were higher than forecasted prices at year-end 2001. As a result of low commodity prices in the fourth quarter 2001, we subjected all properties to impairment testing and recognized a pretax impairment charge related primarily to our Texas properties of 1998. $33.6 million ($21.8 million after tax).

Coal Royalty and Land Management Segment

The coal royalty and land management segment includes Penn Virginia'sPVR’s mineral rights to coal reserves, its timber assets and its other land assets. Selected Financial and Operating Data 2000 1999 1998 (in thousands, except as noted) Revenues Coal royalties $24,308 $17,836 $10,774 Timber 2,388 1,948 1,711 Other 4,355 2,046 2,014 Total Revenues 31,051 21,830 14,499 Expenses Operating costs 3,066 784 276 Exploration expenses 394 268 549 Taxes other than income 663 506 352 General and administrative 3,047 2,623 2,184 Cash Operating Expenses 7,170 4,181 3,361 Depreciation, depletion and amortization 2,047 1,269 589 Total Operating Expenses 9,217 5,450 3,950 Operating Income $21,834 $16,380 $10,549 Production Royalty coal tons produced by lessees (thousands) 12,536 8,603 5,278 Timber sales (Mbf) 8,545 9,020 7,981 Prices Royalty per ton $1.94 $2.07 $2.04 Timber sales price per Mbf $ 257 $ 206 $ 198
Certain reclassifications have been madeThe assets, liabilities and earnings of PVR are fully consolidated in our financial statements, with the public unitholders’ interest reflected as a minority interest.

The Partnership enters into leases with various third-party operators for the right to conformmine coal reserves on the Partnership’s properties in exchange for royalty payments. Coal royalty revenues under non-Peabody leases are based on the higher of a percentage of the gross sales price or a fixed price per ton of coal sold, with pre-established minimum monthly or annual payments. Under the Peabody leases, coal royalty revenues are based on fixed royalty rates which escalate annually, also with pre-established monthly minimums. In addition to coal royalty revenues, the Partnership generates coal service revenues from fees charged to lessees for the use of coal preparation and transportation facilities. The Partnership also generates revenues from the sale of timber on its properties.

The coal royalty stream is impacted by several factors, which PVR generally cannot control. The number of tons mined annually is determined by an operator’s mining efficiency, labor availability, geologic conditions, access to capital, ability to market coal and ability to arrange reliable transportation to the current year presentation. end-user. The possibility exists that new legislation or regulations may be adopted which may have a significant impact on the mining operations of the Partnership’s lessees or their customers’ ability to use coal and may require PVR, its lessees or its lessee’s customers to change operations significantly or incur substantial costs.

Page 27


Selected Financial and Operating Data – Coal Royalty and Land Management

   

2002


  

2001


  

2000


   

(in thousands, except as noted)

Revenues

            

Coal royalties

  

$

31,358

  

$

32,365

  

$

24,308

Timber

  

 

1,640

  

 

1,732

  

 

2,388

Coal services

  

 

1,704

  

 

1,660

  

 

1,385

Other

  

 

3,906

  

 

1,756

  

 

2,108

   

  

  

Total Revenues

  

 

38,608

  

 

37,513

  

 

30,189

Expenses

            

Operating

  

 

3,807

  

 

3,812

  

 

3,480

General and administrative

  

 

6,419

  

 

5,459

  

 

4,847

   

  

  

Operating expenses before non-cash charges

  

 

10,226

  

 

9,271

  

 

8,327

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

  

 

3,955

  

 

3,084

  

 

2,047

   

  

  

Total Operating Expenses

  

 

14,181

  

 

12,355

  

 

10,374

   

  

  

Operating Income

  

$

24,427

  

$

25,158

  

$

19,815

   

  

  

Production

            

Royalty coal tons produced by lessees (thousands)

  

 

14,281

  

 

15,306

  

 

12,536

Timber sales (Mbf)

  

 

8,345

  

 

8,741

  

 

8,545

Prices

            

Royalty per ton

  

$

2.20

  

$

2.11

  

$

1.94

Timber sales price per Mbf

  

$

187

  

$

168

  

$

257

Year Ended December 31, 20002002 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 1999 Revenues.2001

Revenues. Coal royalty and land management segment revenues for the year ended December 31, 2002 were $38.6 million compared to $37.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2001, an increase of $1.1 million, or three percent.

Coal royalty revenues for the year ended December 31, 2002 were $31.4 million compared to $32.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2001, a decrease of $1.0 million, or three percent. Over these same periods, production decreased by 1.0 million tons, or seven percent, from 15.3 million tons to 14.3 millions tons. These decreases were primarily due to weaker coal demand in 2002 in general, and more specifically, the idling of production at the Fork Creek property caused by the lessee’s bankruptcy.

Timber revenues decreased to $1.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2002 from $1.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2001, a decrease of $0.1 million, or five percent. Volume sold declined 396 thousand board feet (Mbf), or five percent, to 8,345 Mbf in 2002, compared to 8,741 Mbf for 2001.

Coal services revenues remained constant at $1.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001. Slight increases in revenues generated from PVR’s modular preparation plants and dock loadout facility were offset by a minor reduction in revenues from its unit-train loadout facility.

Other revenues were $3.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2002 compared to $1.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2001, an increase of $2.1 million, or 122 percent. The increase was primarily due to the recognition of minimum rental payments received from the Partnership’s lessees which are no longer recoupable by the lessee. Two of PVR’s lessees, Horizon Resources, Inc. (formerly AEI Resources, Inc.) and Pen Holdings, Inc., both of which filed Chapter 11 bankruptcies during 2002, accounted for $1.9 million of minimum rental income in 2002.

Page 28


Operating expenses.Operating expenses, which include both lease operating expenses and taxes other than income, were $3.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001. Lease operating expenses were $2.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2002 compared to $3.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2001, a decrease of $0.3 million, or nine percent. This decrease is primarily due to a decrease in production by lessees on the Partnership’s subleased properties, offset by temporary mine maintenance costs on its Coal River property. Aggregate production from subleased properties decreased to 1.8 million tons for the year ended December 31, 2002 from 2.3 million tons for the year ended December 31, 2001. Taxes other than income for the year ended December 31, 2002 was $0.9 million compared to $0.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2001, an increase of $0.3 million, or 45 percent. The increase was primarily due to an increase in state franchise taxes resulting from the Partnership’s change from a corporate to a partnership structure in late 2001. Prior to the initial formation of the Partnership, franchise taxes were calculated based on filing as a corporation.

G&A expenses increased to $6.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2002 compared to $5.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2001, representing an 18 percent increase. The increase was primarily attributable to a full year of fees and expenses associated with the Partnership being a publicly traded entity.

Depreciation and depletion expense for the year ended December 31, 2002 was $4.0 million compared to $3.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2001, an increase of $0.9 million, or 28 percent. The increase in depreciation, depletion and amortization resulted from an increase in the depletive write-off rate per ton caused by a downward revision of coal reserves in the late 2001, higher cost coal properties being added to the depletable base as a result of recent acquisitions, and additional depreciation related to coal services capital projects.

Year Ended December 31, 2001 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2000

Revenues. Coal royalty and land management segment revenues were $31.1$37.5 million in 2001 and $30.2 million in 2000, and $21.8 million in 1999, representing a 4224 percent increase.

Coal royaltiesroyalty revenues increased $6.5$8.1 million from $24.3 million in 2000 primarily due to a $30$32.4 million acquisition in September 1999 and increased production from additional lessees. Coal royalties from2001. Production increases were the acquisition were $1.5 million higher in 2000 because the Company included a full year of operations in 2000 versus three months in 1999. The remainder ofprimary factor related to the increase was attributable to a full year of operation for the Company's unit train loadout, infrastructure additions by two lessees, four additional mines added by lessees andin revenues. Royalty tons increased production2.8 million from numerous lessees due to improved conditions in the coal industry. Timber revenues increased $440,000, or 23 percent, to $2.4 million in 2000; however, timber harvested decreased from 9,020 Mbf in 1999 to 8,545 in 2000. The average price received by the Company increased from $206 per Mbf in 1999 to $257 per Mbf in 2000. These variances are justified by the harvesting of Penn Virginia's higher quality hardwoods in 2000. Other operating income increased to $4.412.5 million in 2000 compared with $2.0to 15.3 million in 1999. Rail car rental, dock rental and various land rentals related to the acquisition in September 1999 accounted for $1.2 million of the increase. Additionally, $603,000 of the increase was attributable to Penn Virginia's unit train loadout facility which had a full year of operation in 2000 versus nine months in 1999. The remainder of the increase is primarily due to $589,000 of additional lease forfeitures received in 2000. Lease forfeitures are recognized as revenue by the Company when lessees fail to meet their minimum required coal2001, or 22 percent. These production for a specified time period; consequently, their non- recoupable minimums would be forfeited and recognized as income by the Company. Expenses. Total operating expenses for the coal royalty and land management segment increased 69 percent to $9.2 million from $5.5 million in 1999. Operating expenses increased from $784,000 in 1999 to $3.1 million in 2000. The September 1999 coal royalty acquisition accounted for $2.2 million of the 2000 increase due to (a) $1.4 million in additional lease expense relating to newly acquired coal reserves, (b) increased expense of $573,000increases were attributable to the leasingstart up of rail cars,five new mines, the June 2001 acquisition of new properties and (c) continuing environmental maintenancethe completion of $213,000 to comply with governmental agency requirements. Exploration expenses increased $126,000 due to additional core drilling and evaluation of samples primarily relating to Penn Virginia's 1999 acquired coal properties. Taxes other than income increased $157,000, or 31 percent, to $663,000 for 2000 due to property taxes associated with the September 1999 acquisition. General and administrative expenses,a capital project on a per ton basis,another lease.

Timber revenues decreased to $0.24 in$1.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2001 from $2.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2000, versus $0.30 in 1999.a decrease of $0.7 million, or 27 percent. The decrease is primarily attributable to a decrease in the average price received for the timber from $257 per Mbf for the year ended December 31, 2000 to $168 per Mbf for the year ended December 31, 2001. The decrease reflects overall market conditions as well as the sale of lower priced species and lower quality timber.

Coal services revenues increased productionto $1.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2001 from $1.4 million in 2000, an increase of $0.3 million, or 20 percent. The increase is a direct result of the addition of a small preparation plant put into service during 2001 and additional usage of the Partnership’s existing coal service facilities.

Other revenues were $1.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2001 compared with $2.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2000, a decrease of $0.3 million, or 17 percent. The decrease was primarily due to gains from the sale of property and equipment in 2000, offset by additional staffing needsthe recognition of minimum rental payments received from lessees which are no longer recoupable.

Operating expenses.Operating expenses were $3.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2001 compared with $3.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2000, an increase of $0.3 million, or 10 percent. This variance is primarily due to an increase in production by lessees on PVR’s subleased properties resulting in royalty expense incurred. Production from the September 1999 coal royalty acquisition. Depreciation, depletion and amortizationsubleased properties increased from $1.32.1 million tons for the year ended December 31, 2000 to 2.3 million tons for the year ended December 31, 2001, an increase of 0.2 million tons, or 10 percent.

G&A expenses increased to $5.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2001 compared to $4.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2000. This increase is primarily attributable to fees associated with tax preparation and public reporting by the Partnership.

Page 29


Depreciation and depletion expense for the year ended December 31, 2001 was $3.1 million compared with $2.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2000, an increase of $1.1 million, or $0.1551 percent. This increase primarily resulted from coal production increases of 22 percent. Depreciation and depletion expense increased, on a per ton in 1999basis, to $2.0 million, or $0.16$0.20 per ton infor the year ended December 31, 2001 from $0.16 for the year ended December 31, 2000. The slight$0.04 increase on a per ton basis is due to the Company's September 1999 acquisition of coal reserves in West Virginia. Other non-operating income. Gain on the sale of property was $897,000 in 2000 primarily due to the sale of a small block of coal reserves in eastern Kentucky. Year Ended December 31, 1999 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 1998 Revenues. Coal royalty and land management segment revenuesresults from increased 51 percent to $21.8 million in 1999 compared with $14.5 million in 1998. The $7.5 million increase in 1999 was attributable to enhanced production from existing lessees due to the completion of the unit train loadout, start-up operations for some lessees and acquisitions. Operating expenses. The coal royalty and land management segment's operating expenses increased $1.5 million, or 37 percent, to $5.5 million, compared with $4.0 million in 1998. Operating expenses increased $0.5 million primarily due to additional lease expense relating to the September 1999 coal royalty acquisition. Exploration expenses decreased $0.3 million to $0.2 million in 1999 primarily due to increased 1998 costs incurred to maintainCoal River property, which has a mine on a terminated lease. General and administrative expenses increased $0.4 million in 1999 due to legal fees incurred by the Company to pursue the potential recovery of coal reserves and the addition of three additional employees in the Charleston, West Virginia office relating to the Company's September 1999 acquisition. Depreciation, depletion and amortization increased from $0.6 million to $1.3 million. The increase is attributable to an increase in coal royalty tons produced by existing lessees, the Company's September 1999 acquisition of coal reserves in West Virginia and the unit train loadout's first year of operation. Corporate and Other Dividends. Dividend income of $2.6 million in 2000 remained constant, compared with $2.6 million in 1999 and 1998. However, in January 2001, Norfolk Southern Corporation reduced its quarterly dividend from $0.20 per share to $0.06 per share. Penn Virginia's holdings primarily consist of 3,307,200 shares of Norfolk Southern Corporation. significantly higher cost basis.

Reserves

Oil and Gas Reserves Penn Virginia's

Our total proved reserves at year-end 2000December 31, 2002 were 174.6273.4 Bcfe, compared with 187.4252.8 Bcfe at 1999 year- end. The decrease is attributable to the sale of mature oil and gas properties, partially offset by acquisitions and extensions, discoveries and other additions. Proved developed reserves increased 6.1 Bcfe, or four percent, to 146.4 Bcfe.December 31, 2001. At year-end 2000,December 31, 2002, proved developed reserves comprised 8479 percent of the Company'sour total proved reserves, compared with 7578 percent at year- end 1999. The Company has 74December 31, 2001. We have 128 net proved undeveloped drilling locations at year-end 2000,December 31, 2002, compared with 13993 locations at year- end 1999. The Company acquired 35.9 Bcfe of proved oil and gas reserves, primarily consisting of royalty interest, during 2000 for $36.0 million. In December 2000, the Company received $54.3 million, after closing adjustments, for the sale of mature oil and gas properties in Kentucky and West Virginia, which contained 66.6 Bcfe of proved oil and gas reserves. Penn Virginia's comparative reserve replacement measures are as follows: 2000 1999 Finding and development cost (a) Current year $ 0.82 $ 2.17 Three year weighted average 1.56 4.03 Reserve replacement cost (b) Current year $ 0.92 $ 0.96 Three year weighted average 1.08 1.51 Reserve replacement percentage (c) Current year 556 % 342 % Three year weighted average 332 % 152 %
31, 2001.

   

2002


   

2001


   

2000


 

Proved reserves

               

Crude oil (Mbbls)

  

 

5,361

 

  

 

3,920

 

  

 

71

 

Natural gas (MMcf)

  

 

241,255

 

  

 

229,253

 

  

 

174,247

 

Proved developed reserves

               

Crude oil (Mbbls)

  

 

2,943

 

  

 

2,212

 

  

 

71

 

Natural gas (MMcf)

  

 

198,733

 

  

 

183,134

 

  

 

145,930

 

Finding and development cost (a), ($/Mcfe)

               

Current year

  

$

1.34

 

  

$

3.26

 

  

$

0.82

 

Three year weighted average

  

 

1.81

 

  

 

2.66

 

  

 

1.56

 

Reserve replacement cost (b), ($/Mcfe)

               

Current year

  

$

1.32

 

  

$

2.22

 

  

$

0.92

 

Three year weighted average

  

 

1.60

 

  

 

1.70

 

  

 

1.08

 

Reserve replacement percentage (c), ($/Mcfe)

               

Current year

  

 

206

%

  

 

660

%

  

 

556

%

Three year weighted average

  

 

432

%

  

 

544

%

  

 

332

%

Finding and development cost, reserve replacement cost and reserve replacement percentage are not measures presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"(“GAAP”) and are not intended to be used in lieu of GAAP presentation. These measures are commonly used by financial statement userswithin the industry as a measurement to determine the performance of a Company'scompany’s oil and gas activities. (a)

(a)Finding and development cost is calculated by dividing 1) costs incurred in certain oil and gas activities less proved property acquisitions, by 2) reserve extensions, discoveries and other additions and revisions. The 2001 finding and development costs used in this calculation included $62.2 million for unproved property acquisition costs (including the impact of deferred income taxes) related to the purchase of certain Gulf Coast oil and gas properties in the third quarter of 2001. No proved reserves were recorded relative to these unproved property acquisition costs, for which future exploration and development activities will be conducted. Had the unproved property acquisition costs been excluded from the 2001 finding and development cost calculations, 2001 and three year weighted average cost per Mcfe would have been $1.41 and $1.24, respectively.
(b)Reserve replacement cost is calculated by dividing 1) costs incurred in certain oil and gas activities, including acquisitions, by 2) reserve purchases, extensions, discoveries and other additions and revisions. The 2001 reserve replacement costs used in this calculation included $62.2 million for unproved property acquisition costs described in footnote (a) above and $27.2 million of deferred income taxes on proved property acquisition costs related to the purchase of certain Gulf Coast oil and gas properties in the third quarter of 2001. Had the unproved property acquisition costs and the deferred income taxes on the proved property acquisition costs been excluded from the 2001 reserve replacement cost calculations, 2001 and three year weighted average cost per Mcfe would have been $1.26 and $1.09, respectively.

Page 30


(c)Reserve replacement percentage is calculated by dividing 1) reserve purchases, revisions, extensions, discoveries and other additions, by 2) oil and gas production.

Proven and development cost is calculated by dividing 1) costs incurred in certain oilProbable Coal Reserves

The Partnership’s proven and gas activities less proved property acquisitions, by 2) reserve extensions, discoveries and other additions and revisions. (b) Reserve replacement cost is calculated by dividing 1) costs incurred in certain oil and gas activities, including acquisitions, by 2) reserve purchases, extensions, discoveries and other additions and revisions. (c) Reserve replacement percentage is calculated by dividing 1) reserve purchases, revisions, extensions, discoveries and other additions, by 2) oil and gas production. Mineable and Merchantable Coal Reserves Penn Virginia's mineable and merchantableprobable coal reserves were 480615 million tons at December 31, 2000,2002 compared with 488493 million tons in 1999. The Company collected royalties for 12.5 million tons in 2000. Mineable and merchantable coal reserves means coal that is economically mineable using existing equipment and methods under federal and state laws now in effect. Market Risk Marketable Equity Securities. At December 31, 2000, the Company's marketable equity securities, consisting primarily of Norfolk Southern Corporation common stock, were recorded at their fair value of $44.1 million, including net unrealized gains of $41.2 million. The closing stock price for Norfolk Southern Corporation was $13.31 and $20.50 per share at December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively. At February 1, 2000, the closing price2001. Royalties were collected for Norfolk Southern Corporation was $16.55. The fair value of the Company's marketable equity securities is significantly affected by market price fluctuations. See Note 4 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Interest Rate Risk. The carrying value of Penn Virginia's debt approximates fair value. At December 31, 2000, the Company had $47.514.3 million of long-term debt represented by an unsecured revolving credit facility (the "Revolver"). The Revolver matures in June 2003 and is governed by a borrowing base calculation that is redetermined semi-annually. The Company has the option to elect interest at (i) Libor plus a Eurodollar margin ranging from 100 to 150 basis points, basedtons mined on the percentage of the borrowing base outstanding or (ii) the greater of the prime rate or federal funds rate plus 50 basis points. As a result, the Company's 2001 interest costs will fluctuate based on short-term interest rates relatingPartnership’s properties in 2002.

Capital Resources and Liquidity

Prior to the Revolver. Price Risk Management. Penn Virginia's price risk program permits the utilization of fixed-price contracts and financial instruments (such as futures, forward and option contracts and swaps) to mitigate the price risks associated with fluctuations in natural gas prices as they relate to the Company's anticipated production. These contracts and/or financial instruments are designated as hedges and accounted for on the accrual basis with gains and losses being recognized based on the type of contract and exposure being hedged. Realized gains and losses on natural gas financial instruments designated as hedges of anticipated transactions are treated as deferred charges or credits, as applicable, on the balance sheet until recognized. Through December 31, 2000, net gains and losses on such financial instruments, including accrued gains or losses upon maturity or termination of the contract, are recognized in operating income concurrently with the hedged transaction. Effective January 1, 2001, the Company accountssatisfied its working capital requirements and funded its capital expenditure and dividend payments with cash generated from operations and credit facility borrowings. In 2001, the acquisition of Gulf Coast properties was funded with credit facility borrowings that were subsequently repaid with proceeds from PVR’s initial public offering. Although results are consolidated for its derivative activitiesfinancial reporting, the resultant change in accordanceownership structure of PVR caused the Company and PVR to operate with Statementindependent capital structures. The Company and PVR have separate credit facilities, for which neither entity guarantees the debt of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 133, as amended by SFAS No. 137the other. Since PVR’s public offering, the cash needs of each entity have been met independently with a combination of operating cash flows, credit facility borrowings and, SFAS No. 138. See Note 2 (New Accounting Standards) in the financial statements. SFAS No. 133, as amended by SFAS No. 137 and SFAS No. 138, alterscase of PVR’s Peabody Acquisition, issuance of new partnership units. We expect that the reporting by companies that use derivative instruments. The new rule, which went into effect January 1, 2001, requires companies to recognize derivatives as assets or liabilities in their balance sheets and to measure them at "fair value." Penn Virginia, from time to time, hedges in the form of "costless collars." The options establish a price "collar" around the gas. The hedging strategy is costless because the purchasecash needs of the "put" optionsCompany and PVR will continue to sell gas atbe met with a combination of these funding sources.

Except where noted, the floor price was offset by the salefollowing discussion of cash flows and contractual obligations relates to consolidated results of the "call" option on Penn Virginia gas at the ceiling price. If the price of gas falls, Penn Virginia's expected revenue stream from producing properties also declines; however, the value of the "put" option increases. In accounting for cash flow hedges under SFAS No. 133, part of the change in option value would be reported as an operating gain or loss in Penn Virginia's quarterly income statement (the gain or loss will be reversed in future quarters as the true value of the option diminishes to zero at the expiration date.) Consequently, if the price of gas (and Penn Virginia's expected revenue stream) rises, the cost to unwind the call option increases, creating an operating loss. As a result, the Company's earnings could experience increased volatility over the term of the costless collar. Natural gas pricing was extremely volatile in 2000. In AprilCompany and May of 2000, the Company entered into several physical contracts that totaling 9,289 MMcf per day for the remainder of 2000. The volumes under contract accounted for 20 percent of Penn Virginia's 2000 production at a price of $3.39 per Mcf. The Company had one contract remaining that expires in March 2001 covering 18 percent of anticipated first quarter production at $3.12 per Mcf. This physical contract is not considered to be a derivative instrument under SFAS No. 133, as amended, as such contracts qualify for the normal purchase and sale exception. In January 2001, the Company hedged 13 percent of its anticipated production for the second and third quarters of 2001 through a basis swap and a costless collar with a floor of $4.95 per Mcf and a ceiling of $7.16 per Mcf. Additionally, basis swaps covering an additional 11 percent of anticipated production for the same periods were executed. Capital Resources and Liquidity PVR.

Cash flows from Operating Activities Funding for the Company's activities has historically been provided by operating cash flows and bank borrowings.

Net cash provided from operating activities was $65.8 million in 2002, compared with $44.2 million in 2001 and $41.7 million in 2000, compared with $25.1 million in 1999 and $19.4 million in 1998. The Company's2000. Our consolidated cash balance remained constant atincreased to $13.3 million in 2002 compared with $9.6 million in 2001 and $0.7 million in 2000, respectively. As a result of PVR’s public offering, approximately $9.6 million and 1999. $8.3 million of the consolidated cash balance as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively, was held by PVR primarily for working capital requirements.

Cash flows from Investing Activities The Company

Cash used in investing activities was $99.5 million in 2002, compared with $179.4 million in 2001 and $3.3 million in investing activities in 2000, compared with $58.7 million in 1999 and $18.3 million in 1998. Capital2000. Cash was used during these periods primarily for capital expenditures including acquisitions and noncash items, totaled $59.4 million, compared with $60.7 million in 1999 and $23.6 million in 1998. Capital expenditures in 2000 were partially offset from the sale of certainfor oil and gas development and exploration activities and acquisitions of oil and gas and coal properties, totaling $55.2offset in part by proceeds from sales of securities and non-strategic oil and gas properties.

Page 31


Capital expenditures totaled $204.8 million after closing adjustments.in 2002, compared with $241.7 million in 2001 and $61.4 million in 2000. The following table sets forth capital expenditures, including acquisitions and noncash items, made by the Company during the periods indicated. Year ended December 31, 2000 1999 1998 Oil and gas (in thousands) Acquisitions $36,916 $16,620 $3,557 Development 18,317 9,189 8,527 Exploration 3,200 2,587 1,534 Support equipment and facilities 244 209 171 Coal royalty and land management Lease acquisitions - 30,094 6,260 Support equipment and facilities 485 1,861 3,532 Other 281 91 42 Total capital expenditures $59,443 $60,651 $23,623

   

Year ended December 31,


   

2002


  

2001


  

2000


   

(in thousands)

Oil and gas

   

Development Drilling

  

$

39,014

  

$

30,123

  

$

18,317

Exploration Drilling

  

 

2,485

  

 

11,253

  

 

3,200

Seismic and other

  

 

5,358

  

 

2,561

  

 

1,925

Lease Acquisitions

  

 

7,346

  

 

161,631

  

 

36,916

Field Projects

  

 

2,736

  

 

1,422

  

 

244

   

  

  

Total

  

 

56,939

  

 

206,990

  

 

60,602

   

  

  

Coal royalty and land management

            

Lease acquisitions

  

 

138,450

  

 

32,992

  

 

—  

Support equipment and facilities

  

 

9,085

  

 

677

  

 

485

   

  

  

Total

  

 

147,535

  

 

33,669

  

 

485

   

  

  

Other

  

 

343

  

 

1,074

  

 

281

   

  

  

Total capital expenditures

  

$

204,817

  

$

241,733

  

$

61,368

   

  

  

The Company drilled 75.3 net successful development wells, 0.2 net successful exploratory wellscapital expenditures noted above include noncash items related to equity issued in the form of PVR common units in connection with PVR’s Peabody Acquisition in 2002 and 2.6 net non-productive wellsdeferred taxes related to the Company’s acquisition of Gulf Coast properties in 2000, compared with 38.1 net successful development wells, 9.2 net successful exploratory wells and 2.0 net non-productive wells in 1999. 2001.

Management is committed to expanding its oil and natural gas operations over the next several years through a combination of exploitation, exploration and acquisition of new properties. During 2000, the Company acquired proved naturalWe have a portfolio of assets which balance relatively low risk, moderate return development projects in Appalachia, Mississippi and west Texas with relatively moderate risk, potentially higher return development projects and exploration prospects in south Texas and south Louisiana.

Oil and gas segment capital expenditures for 2003, including our January 2003 acquisition of properties in Appalachia at a costSouth Texas for $32.5 million, are estimated to be $110 to $120 million. Approximately $53 to $57 million of $36.0 million, including a $34.7 million acquisition of royalty interests in West Virginiathe planned oil and eastern Kentucky. The properties had proved reserves of 35.9 Bcfe at December 31, 2000 in addition to significant drilling potential. The Company continued to develop the property it acquired in July 1999 in Mississippi by drilling 41 gross wells (37.7 net) in 2000. The acquisition, which was 99 percent natural gas added 23.3 Bcfe in proved reserves and provided numerous future drilling locations. The Company drilled seven gross (1.4 net) exploratory wells in a Texas onshore gulf coast exploration project, of which one gross (0.2 net) well was successful, four gross (0.8 net) wells were non-productive and two gross (0.4 net) wells are under evaluation. The Company is still evaluating the unproved properties associated with the 20 percent working interest in the project. Capitalcapital expenditures for 2001, before lease and proved property acquisitions, are expected to be $43for development drilling projects, including horizontal coalbed methane drilling in Appalachia, development of the South Texas properties acquired in January 2003 and continued drilling in our Mississippi and west Texas fields. Exploration drilling is expected to $50be approximately $11 to $13 million including $41of the planned expenditures, concentrated primarily in south Louisiana and south Texas. Expenditures to $47build our library of 3-D seismic data for drilling prospect generation is expected to be approximately $6 to $7 million, and lease acquisition and field project expenditures are expected to be $8 to $10 million. Capital expenditures for the oil and gas segment and $2 to $3 million for2003 in the coal royalty and land management segment. In addition, Penn Virginia planssegment are expected to invest an additional $2be up to $3 million in seismic. The Companyfor the construction of fee-based infrastructure facilities. We continually review drilling and other capital expenditure plans to drill approximately 180 to 200 gross (120 to 140 net) wells. Management continually reviews the Company's drilling expenditures and may increase, decrease or reallocatechange these amounts based on industry conditions. Management believes itsconditions and the availability of capital. We believe our cash flow from operations portfolio of investments and sources of debt financing are sufficient to fund its 2001our 2003 planned capital expenditure program. In September 1999, the Company completed an acquisition which included over 90 million tons of high quality coal reserves as well as oil and gas leases, timber assets, a short line railroad and a coal loading dock on the Kanawha River in West Virginia. The $30 million acquisition complements the Company's existing Coal River Properties located on the inland river system in West Virginia. The Company continues to diversify its coal customer base by adding additional lessees and by searching for additional coal reserve acquisition opportunities.

Cash flows from Financing Activities

Net cash provided (used) by (used in) financing activities was $(38.4)$37.4 million in 2000,2002, compared with $34.0$144.1 million in 19992001 and $(1.7)($38.4) million in 1998. Penn Virginia2000. Credit facility borrowings provided approximately $58.8 million of cash from financing activities during 2002, offset in part by $8.0 million of dividend payments and distributions to PVR’s minority unitholders of $13.8 million. In 2001, proceeds to the Company of $142.4 million from PVR’s initial public offering allowed the Company to repay borrowings made for acquisitions after $7.9 million of dividend payments. In 2000, operating cash flows allowed the Company to repay debt of $30.3 million and to fund dividends of $7.4 million.

Page 32


The Company has a $150 million unsecuredsecured revolving credit facility (the "Revolver"“Revolver”) led by J.P. Morgan Chase Bank with a final maturity of June 2003.October 2004. The credit facility has a borrowing base of $140 million and the Company had borrowings of $16.0 million and $3.5 million against the facility as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The Revolver contains financial covenants requiring the Company to maintain certain levels of net worth, debt-to-capitalization and dividend limitation restrictions, among other requirements. We currently have a $5 million line of credit with a financial institution due in March 2003, renewable annually. We have the option to elect either a fixed rate LIBOR loan or floating rate LIBOR loan.

In connection with the closing of its initial public offering in 2001, PVR entered into a three-year credit agreement with a syndicate of financial institutions led by PNC Bank, National Association. The outstanding balance oncredit agreement consists of two facilities, a revolving credit facility of $50.0 million (the “PVR Revolver”) and a term loan facility of up to $43.4 million (the “PVR Term Loan”). Both credit facilities mature in October 2004. The PVR Revolver is available for general partnership purposes, including working capital, capital expenditures, and acquisitions, and includes a $5.0 million distribution sublimit that is available for working capital needs and distributions and a $5.0 million sublimit for the issuance of letters of credit. In connection with the closing of its initial public offering, PVR borrowed $43.4 million under the PVR Term Loan and purchased and pledged $43.4 million of U.S. Treasury notes, which secured the term loan facility. In 2002, the U.S. Treasury Notes were liquidated for the purpose of funding acquisitions, and as of December 31, 2002, the obligations under the PVR Term Loan facility were unsecured. Total borrowings of as of December 31, 2002 against the PVR Revolver wasand PVR Term Loan were $47.5 million and $77.7$43.4 million, respectively. The PVR credit agreement contains financial covenants requiring the Partnership to certain levels of net worth and of debt to EBITDA (as defined by the credit agreement). The Partnership has the option to elect interest at Decemberi) LIBOR plus a Euro-rate margin of 0.5 percent, based on certain financial data, or (ii) the greater of the prime rate or federal funds rate plus .05 percent.

PVR is currently attempting to refinance up to $90 million of borrowings against its credit agreement with more permanent debt. This refinancing is expected to be completed by March 31, 20002003, with proceeds used to repay and 1999, respectively. retire the PVR Term Loan and to repay most of the borrowings on the PVR Revolver. If the refinancing is not completed by March 31, 2003, PVR will be required to provide security to the syndicate of financial institutions in its credit agreement for all borrowings against its credit agreement.

Management believes its portfolio of investments and sources of funding are sufficient to meet short and long-term liquidity needs not funded by cash flows from operations. Other In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Statement

Page 33


Contractual Obligations

Our contractual obligations as of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities." SFAS No. 133,December 31, 2002, are as amended by SFAS No. 137 and SFAS No. 138, establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, (collectively referred to as derivatives) and for hedging activities. It requires an entity to recognize all derivatives as either assets or liabilities in the statement of financial position and measure those instruments at fair value. If certain conditions are met, a derivative may be specifically designated as (a) a hedge of the exposure to changes in the fair value of a recognized asset or liability or an unrecognized firm commitment, (b) a hedge of the exposure to changes in the fair value of the exposure to variable cash flows of a forecasted transaction, or (c) a hedge of the foreign currency exposure of a net investment in a foreign operation, an unrecognized firm commitment, an available-for-sale security, or a foreign currency denominated forecasted transaction. Special accounting for qualifying hedges allows a derivative's gains and losses to offset related results on the hedged item in the Company's statement of income. The adoption of SFAS No. 133 on January 1, 2001 did not have a material impact on the Company's financial position or results of operations. In December 1999, the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101, "Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements' ("SAB No. 101"). SAB No. 101, as amended, summarizes the SEC's views in applying generally accepted accounting principles to revenue recognition in financial statements. The adoption of SAB No. 101 on October 1, 2000 did not have a material effect on the Company's financial position or results of operations. follows:

   

Total


  

Payments Due by Period


  

Thereafter


     

Less Than

1 Year


  

1-3 Years


    

4-5 Years


  
   

(in thousands)

Penn Virginia revolver

  

$

16,000

  

$

—  

  

$

16,000

    

$

—  

  

$

—  

PVR revolver

  

 

47,500

  

 

—  

  

 

47,500

    

 

—  

  

 

—  

PVR term loan

  

 

43,387

  

 

—  

  

 

43,387

    

 

—  

  

 

—  

Line of credit

  

 

52

  

 

52

  

 

—  

    

 

—  

  

 

—  

Rental commitments (1)

  

 

8,081

  

 

2,855

  

 

3,237

    

 

1,989

  

 

—  

   

  

  

    

  

Total contractual cash obligations

  

$

115,020

  

$

2,907

  

$

110,124

    

$

1,989

  

$

—  

(1)Rental commitments primarily relate to equipment, car and building leases. Also included are the Partnership’s rental commitments, which primarily relate to reserve-based properties which are, or are intended to be, subleased by the Partnership to third parties. The obligation expires when the property has been mined to exhaustion or the lease has been canceled. The timing of mining by third party operators is difficult to estimate due to numerous factors. We believe the obligation after five years cannot be reasonably estimated; however, based on current knowledge, we believe the Partnership will incur approximately $0.4 million in rental commitments in perpetuity until the reserves have been exhausted.

Environmental Matters Penn Virginia's operating segments

Our businesses are subject to various environmental hazards. Several federal, state and local laws, regulations and rules govern the environmental aspects of the Company's business.our businesses. Noncompliance with these laws, regulations and rules can result in substantial penalties or other liabilities. The Company doesWe do not believe itsour environmental risks are materially different from those of comparable companies ornor that cost of compliance will have a material adverse effect on our profitability, capital expenditures, cash flows or competitive position. ThereHowever, there is no assurance that future changes in or additions to laws, regulations or rules regarding the protection of the environment will not have such an impact. The Company believes it isWe believe we are materially in compliance with environmental laws, regulations and rules.

In conjunction with the Partnership’s leasing of property to coal operators, all environmental and reclamation liabilities are generally the responsibilityresponsibilities of the Partnership’s lessees. Lessees post performance bonds pursuant to federal and state mining laws and regulations for the estimated costs of reclamation and mine closing, including the cost of treating mine water discharge when necessary.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 143,Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations, which addresses financial accounting and reporting for obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the associated asset retirement costs. The Company evaluatesStandard applies to legal obligations associated with the retirement of long-lived assets that result from the acquisition, construction, development or normal use of the asset.

SFAS No. 143 requires that the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation be recognized in the period in which it is incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. The fair value of the liability is also added to the carrying amount of the associated asset and this additional carrying amount is depreciated over the life of the asset. The liability is accreted at the end of each period through charges to operating expense. If the obligation is settled for other than the carrying amount of the liability, we will recognize a gain or loss on settlement.

We will adopt the provisions of SFAS No. 143 effective January 1, 2003. We identified all required asset retirement obligations and determined the fair value of these obligations on the date of adoption. The determination of fair value was based upon regional market and specific well or mine type information. In conjunction with the initial application of SFAS No. 143, it is expected we will record a cumulative-effect of change in accounting principle, net of taxes, of approximately $0.5 to $1.5 million as an increase to

Page 34


income, which will be reflected in the Company’s results of operations for 2003. In addition, it is expected we will record an asset retirement obligation of approximately $2.3 to $3.3 million.

In April 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 145,Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections.This Statement rescinds SFAS No. 4,Reporting Gains and Losses from Extinguishment of Debt,which required all gains and losses from extinguishment of debt to be aggregated and, if material, classified as an extraordinary item of debt to be aggregated and, if material, classified as an extraordinary item, net of income taxes. As a result, the criteria in Accounting Principles Board Opinion (APB) Opinion No. 30 will now be used to classify those gains and losses. Any gain or loss on the extinguishment of debt that was classified as an extraordinary item in prior periods presented that does not meet the criteria in APB Opinion No. 30 for classification as an extraordinary item shall be reclassified. The provisions of this Statement are effective for fiscal years beginning after January 1, 2003. The initial adoption of SFAS No. 145 did not have a material effect on the financial capabilityposition, results of each lessee prioroperations or liquidity of the Company.

In June 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146,Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities. This statement requires the recognition of costs associated with exit or disposal activities when they are incurred rather than at the date of a commitment to an exit or disposal plan. The provisions of this statement are effective for exit or disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002.

In November 2002, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 45 ( FIN 45),Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements forGuarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of the Indebtedness of Others, which clarifies the requirements of SFAS No. 5,Accounting for Contingencies, relating to a guarantor’s accounting for and disclosures of certain guarantees issued. FIN 45 requires enhanced disclosures for certain guarantees. It also will require certain guarantees that are issued or modified after December 31, 2002, including certain third-party guarantees, to be initially recorded on the balance sheet at fair value. For guarantees issued on or before December 31, 2002, liabilities are recorded when and if payments become probable and estimable. The financial statement recognition provisions are effective prospectively, and the Company cannot reasonably estimate the impact of adopting FIN 45 until guarantees are issued or modified in future periods, at which time their results will be initially reported in the financial statements.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Interest Rate Risk. The carrying value of our debt approximates fair value. At December 31, 2002, we had $16.0 million of long-term debt represented by a secured revolving credit facility (the “PVA Revolver”). The PVA Revolver matures in October 2004 and is governed by a borrowing base calculation that is redetermined semi-annually. We have the option to elect interest at (i) LIBOR plus a Eurodollar margin ranging from 1.375 to 1.875 percent, based on the percentage of the borrowing base outstanding or (ii) the greater of the prime rate or federal funds rate plus a margin ranging from 0.375 to 0.875 percent. As a result, our 2003 interest costs will fluctuate based on short-term interest rates relating to the leasingPVA Revolver.

Additionally, PVR had outstanding borrowings of property. $90.9 million, consisting of $47.5 million borrowed against its $50 million revolving credit facility (the “PVR Revolver”) and $43.4 million of a fully-drawn term loan (the “PVR Term Loan”). Both the PVR Revolver and PVR Term Loan mature in October 2004. Regarding the unsecured PVR Revolver, PVR has the option to elect interest at (i) LIBOR plus a Euro-rate margin ranging from 1.25 to 1.75 percent, based upon certain financial data, or (ii) the greater of the prime rate or federal funds rate plus 0.5 percent. Regarding the PVR Term Loan, PVR has the option to elect interest at (i) LIBOR plus a Euro-rate margin of 0.5 percent, based upon certain financial data or (ii) the greater of the prime rate or federal funds rate plus 0.5 percent. As a result of both instruments, PVR’s interest costs will fluctuate based on short-term interest rates.

Page 35


Price Risk Management.Our price risk management program permits the utilization of derivative financial instruments (such as futures, forwards, option contracts and swaps) to mitigate the price risks associated with fluctuations in natural gas and crude oil prices as they relate to our anticipated production. These contracts and/or financial instruments are designated as cash flow hedges and accounted for in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 133, as amended by SFAS No. 137 and SFAS No. 138. See Note 9 (Price Risk Management Activities) of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, for more information. The derivative financial instruments are placed with major financial institutions that we believe are of minimum credit risk. The fair value of our price risk management assets are significantly affected by energy price fluctuations. As of February 14, 2003, our open commodity price risk management positions on average daily volumes were as follows:

Natural gas hedging positions

  

Costless Collars


  

Swaps


   

MMBtu Per Day


  

Price / MMBtu (a)


  

MMBtu Per Day


  

Price

/MMBtu


     

Floor


  

Ceiling


    

First Quarter 2003

  

15,000

  

$

3.15

  

$

5.05

  

3,164

  

$

4.70

Second Quarter 2003

  

21,500

  

$

3.39

  

$

5.36

  

3,399

  

$

4.70

Third Quarter 2003

  

21,500

  

$

3.39

  

$

5.36

  

2,570

  

$

4.70

Fourth Quarter 2003

  

19,500

  

$

3.49

  

$

5.46

  

2,034

  

$

4.70

First Quarter 2004

  

19,500

  

$

3.54

  

$

5.51

  

1,800

  

$

4.70

Second Quarter 2004

  

14,137

  

$

3.56

  

$

5.70

  

1,533

  

$

4.70

Third Quarter 2004

  

1,348

  

$

3.72

  

$

6.97

  

1,367

  

$

4.70

Fourth Quarter 2004

  

—  

  

$

—  

  

$

—  

  

1,234

  

$

4.70

First Quarter 2005 (January)

  

—  

  

$

—  

  

$

—  

  

1,100

  

$

4.70

(a)The costless collar natural gas prices per MMBtu per quarter include the effects of basis differentials, if any, that may be hedged.

Crude oil hedging positions

  

Costless Collars


  

Swaps


   

Barrels Per Day


  

Price / Barrel


  

Barrels Per Day


  

Price

/Barrel


     

Floor


  

Ceiling


    

First Quarter 2003

  

500

  

$

23.00

  

$

28.75

  

150

  

$

26.93

Second Quarter 2003

  

500

  

$

23.00

  

$

28.75

  

170

  

$

26.93

Third Quarter 2003

  

—  

  

$

—  

  

$

—  

  

250

  

$

26.76

Fourth Quarter 2003

  

—  

  

$

—  

  

$

—  

  

220

  

$

26.74

First Quarter 2004

  

—  

  

$

—  

  

$

—  

  

207

  

$

26.73

Second Quarter 2004

  

—  

  

$

—  

  

$

—  

  

193

  

$

26.71

Third Quarter 2004

  

—  

  

$

—  

  

$

—  

  

63

  

$

26.93

Fourth Quarter 2004

  

—  

  

$

—  

  

$

—  

  

57

  

$

26.93

First Quarter 2005 (January)

  

—  

  

$

—  

  

$

—  

  

50

  

$

26.93

Page 36


Forward-Looking Statements

Statements included in this report which are not historical facts (including any statements concerning plans and objectives of management for future operations or economic performance, or assumptions related thereto) are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. In addition, Penn Virginiawe and itsour representatives may from time to time make other oral or written statements whichthat are also forward-looking statements.

Such forward-looking statements may include, among other things, statements regarding development activities, capital expenditures, acquisitions and dispositions, drilling and exploration programs, expected commencement dates of coal mining or oil and gas production, projected quantities of future oil, and gas, production by Penn Virginia, projected quantities of futureor coal production, by the Company's lessees producing coal from reserves leased from Penn Virginia, costs and expenditures as well as projected demand or supply for, coal and oil and natural gas, all of which willmay affect sales levels, prices and royalties realized by Penn Virginia. Virginia and PVR.

These forward-looking statements are made based upon management'smanagement’s current plans, expectations, estimates, assumptions and beliefs concerning future events impacting Penn Virginia and PVR and, therefore, involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Penn Virginia cautions that forward-looking statements are not guarantees and that actual results could differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements.

Important factors that could cause the actual results of operations or financial condition of Penn Virginia to differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements include, but are not necessarily limited to: the cost of finding and successfully developing oil and gas reserves; the cost to PVR of finding new coal reserves; the ability of Penn Virginia to acquire new oil and gas reserves and of PVR to acquire new coal reserves on satisfactory terms; the price for which such reserves can be sold; the volatility of commodity prices for oil and gas and coal; the risks associated with having or not having price risk management programs; Penn Virginia'sPVR’s ability to lease new and existing coal reserves; the ability of Penn Virginia'sPVR’s lessees to produce sufficient quantities of coal on an economic basis from Penn Virginia'sPVR’s reserves; the ability of lessees to obtain favorable contracts for coal produced from Penn VirginiaPVR’s reserves; Penn Virginia'sVirginia’s ability to obtain adequate pipeline transportation capacity for its oil and gas production; competition among producers in the coal and oil and gas and coal industries generally and in the Appalachian Basin in particular;generally; the extent to which the amount and quality of actual production differs from estimated mineable and merchantable coal reserves andrecoverable proved oil and gas reserves and coal reserves; unanticipated geological problems; availability of required materials and equipment; the occurrence of unusual weather or operating conditions including force majeure or events; the failure of equipment or processes to operate in accordance with specifications or expectations; delays in anticipated start-up dates;date of Penn Virginia’s oil and natural gas production and PVR’s lessees’ mining operations; environmental risks affecting the drilling and producing of oil and gas wells or the mining of coal reserves; the timing of receipt of necessary governmental permits;permits by Penn Virginia and by PVR’s lessees; labor relations and costs; accidents; changes in governmental regulation or enforcement practices, especially with respect to environmental, health and safety matters, including with respect to emissions levels applicable to coal-burning power generators; uncertainties relating to the outcome of mountaintop removal litigation and issues regarding coal truck weight restriction enforcement and legislation; risks and uncertainties relating to general domestic and international economic (including inflation and interest rates) and political conditions; and the experience and financial condition of lessees of PVR’s coal reserves joint venture partners and purchasers of reserves in transactions financed by Penn Virginia, including their ability to satisfy their royalty, environmental, reclamation and other obligations to Penn VirginiaPVR and others; changes in financial market conditions; changes in the market prices or value of the marketable securities owned by Penn Virginia, including the price of Norfolk Southern common stock and other risk factors detailed in Penn Virginia's Securities and Exchange commission filings.others. Many of such factors are beyond Penn Virginia'sVirginia’s ability to control or predict. Readers are cautioned not to put undue reliance on forward-looking statements.

While Penn Virginia periodically reassesses material trends and uncertainties affecting Penn Virginia'sVirginia’s results of operations and financial condition in connection with the preparation of Management'sManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition and certain other sections contained in Penn Virginia'sVirginia’s quarterly, annual or other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Penn Virginia does not intendundertake any obligation to review or update any particular forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Page 37


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. PENN VIRGINIA CORPORATION February 14, 2001 By: /s/ James O. Idiaquez (James O. Idiaquez, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer) February 14, 2001 By: /s/ Ann N. Horton (Ann N. Horton, Vice President and Principal Accounting Officer)

PENN VIRGINIA CORPORATION

March 7, 2003

By:

/s/    Frank A. Pici


(Frank A. Pici, Executive Vice President

and Chief Financial Officer)

March 7, 2003

By:

/s/    Dana G. Wright


(Dana G. Wright, Vice President

and Principal Accounting Officer)

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

/s/

/s/    Robert Garrett


(Robert Garrett)

Chairman of the Board February 20, 2001 (Robert Garrett) and Director /s/ Richard A. Bachmann

March 7, 2003

/s/    Edward B Cloues, II


(Edward B. Cloues, II)

Director February 20, 2001 (Richard A. Bachmann) /s/ Lennox K. Black Director February 20, 2001 (Lennox K. Black) /s/ John D. Cadigan Director February 20, 2001 (John D. Cadigan) /s/

March 7, 2003

/s/    A. James Dearlove


(A. James Dearlove)

Director and February 14, 2001 (A. James Dearlove) Chief Executive Officer /s/

March 7, 2003

/s/    H. Jarrell Gibbs


(H. Jarrell Gibbs)

Director

March 7, 2003

/s/    Keith D. Horton


(Keith D. Horton)

Director and February 20, 2001 (Keith D. Horton) Executive Vice President /s/ Peter B. Lilly Director February 14, 2001 (Peter B. Lilly) /s/

March 7, 2003

/s/    Marsha R. Perelman Director February 14, 2001 (Marsha


(Marsha R. Perelman) /s/

Director

March 7, 2003

/s/    Joe T. Rye Director February 14, 2001 (Joe


(Joe T. Rye) /s/ John A. H. Shober

Director February 20, 2001 (John A. H. Shober) ITEM 8 - FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

March 7, 2003

/s/    Gary K. Wright


(Gary K. Wright)

Director

March 7, 2003

Page 38


CERTIFICATIONS

I, A. James Dearlove, President and Chief Executive Officer of Penn Virginia Corporation (the “Registrant”), certify that:

1.I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of the Registrant;

2.Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and Subsidiaries Index to Financial Section Management's Report on Financial Information 31 Reports of Independent Public Accountants 32 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data 33 Management's Report on Financial Information Management of Penn Virginia Corporation is responsible for the preparation and integrity of theother financial information included in this annual report. The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, which involve the use of estimates and judgments where appropriate. The corporation has a system of internal accounting controls designed to provide reasonable assurance that assets are safeguarded against loss or unauthorized use and to produce the records necessary for the preparation of financial information. The system of internal control is supported by the selection and training of qualified personnel, the delegation of management authority and responsibility, and dissemination of policies and procedures. There are limits inherent in all systems of internal control based on the recognition that the costs of such systems should be related to the benefits to be derived. We believe the corporation's systems provide this appropriate balance. The corporation's independent public accountants, Arthur Andersen LLP, have developed an understanding of our accounting and financial controls and have conducted such tests as they consider necessary to support their opinion on the financial statements. Their report, contains an independent, informed judgment as to the corporation's reported results of operations and financial position. The Board of Directors pursues its oversight role for the financial statements through the Audit Committee, which consists solely of outside directors. The Audit Committee meets regularly with management, the internal auditor and Arthur Andersen LLP, jointly and separately, to review management's process of implementation and maintenance of internal controls, and auditing and financial reporting matters. The independent and internal auditors have unrestricted access to the Audit Committee. A. James Dearlove James O. Idiaquez President and Executive Vice President and Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS To the Shareholders of Penn Virginia Corporation: We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Penn Virginia Corporation (a Virginia corporation) and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2000. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to abovefairly present fairly, in all material respects the financial positioncondition, results of Penn Virginia Corporationoperations and subsidiariescash flows of the Registrant as of, December 31, 2000 and 1999,for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Registrant and we have:

a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b)evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the “Evaluation Date”); and

c)presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of Registrant’s board of directors:

a)all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal controls; and

6.The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:

March 11, 2003


/s/    A. James Dearlove


A. James Dearlove

President and Chief Executive Officer

Page 39


I, Frank A. Pici, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Penn Virginia Corporation (the “Registrant”), certify that:

1.I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of the Registrant;

2.Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three yearsRegistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Registrant and we have:

a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b)evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the “Evaluation Date”); and

c)presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of Registrant’s board of directors:

a)all significant deficiencies in the period ended December 31, 2000,design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in conformity with accounting principles generally acceptedinternal controls; and

b)any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the United States. ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP Houston, Texas February 9, 2001 PENN VIRGINIA CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (in thousands, except share data) Registrant’s internal controls; and

Year Ended December 31, 2000 1999 1998 Revenues Oil
6.The Registrant’s other certifying officer and condensate $ 832 $ 463 $ 335 Natural gas 46,019 21,384 20,482 Coal royalties 24,308 17,836 10,774 Timber 2,388 1,948 1,711 Dividends 2,646 2,646 2,646 Other 5,010 3,140 2,304 81,203 47,417 38,252 Expenses Lease operating expenses 7,629 4,873 4,037 Exploration expenses 5,660 2,146 1,189 TaxesI have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other than income 3,648 2,795 2,788 Generalfactors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and administrative 11,398 8,775 8,234 Impairmentmaterial weaknesses.

Date:

March 11, 2003


/s/    Frank A. Pici


Frank A. Pici

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Page 40


ITEM 8 –FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Penn Virginia Corporation and Subsidiaries

Index to Financial Section

Management’s Report on Financial Information

42

Reports of oilIndependent Public Accountants

43

Financial Statements and gas properties - - 4,641 Depreciation, depletionSupplementary Data

45

Page 41


Management’s Report on Financial Information

Management of Penn Virginia Corporation (the “Company”) is responsible for the preparation and integrity of the financial information included in this annual report. The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which involve the use of estimates and judgments where appropriate.

The Company has a system of internal accounting controls designed to provide reasonable assurance that assets are safeguarded against loss or unauthorized use and to produce the records necessary for the preparation of financial information. The system of internal control is supported by the selection and training of qualified personnel, the delegation of management authority and responsibility, and dissemination of policies and procedures. There are limits inherent in all systems of internal control based on the recognition that the costs of such systems should be related to the benefits to be derived. We believe the Company’s systems provide this appropriate balance.

The Company’s independent public accountants, KPMG LLP, have developed an understanding of our accounting and financial controls and have conducted such tests as they consider necessary to support their opinion on the 2002 financial statements. Their report contains an independent, informed judgment as to the corporation’s reported results of operations and financial position for 2002.

The Board of Directors pursues its oversight role for the financial statements through the Audit Committee, which consists solely of outside directors. The Audit Committee meets regularly with management, the internal auditor and KPMG LLP, jointly and separately, to review management’s process of implementation and maintenance of internal controls, and auditing and financial reporting matters. The independent and internal auditors have unrestricted access to the Audit Committee.

A. James Dearlove

President and amortization 12,027 8,393 7,162 40,362 26,982 28,051 Operating Income 40,841 20,435 10,201 Other income (expense) Interest expense (7,878) (3,298) (2,017) Interest income 1,458 1,354 3,421 Gain on the sale of properties 24,795 280 65 Other 14 63 283 Income from operations before income taxes 59,230 18,834 11,953 Income tax expense 19,965 4,330 2,362 Net Income $ 39,265 $14,504 $9,591 Net income per share, basic $4.76 $1.73 $1.15 Net income per share, diluted $4.69 $1.71 $1.13 Weighted average shares outstanding, basic 8,241 8,406 8,310 Weighted average shares outstanding, diluted 8,371 8,480 8,463

Chief Executive Officer

Frank A. Pici

Executive Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer

Page 42


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT

To the Shareholders of Penn Virginia Corporation:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Penn Virginia Corporation (a Virginia corporation) and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the year then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit. The 2001 and 2000 consolidated financial statements of Penn Virginia Corporation and subsidiaries were audited by other auditors who have ceased operations. Those auditors expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements in their report dated February 18, 2002.

We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Penn Virginia Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

KPMG LLP

Houston, Texas

February 14, 2003

Page 43


THIS REPORT IS A COPY OF A REPORT PREVIOUSLY ISSUED BY ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP. THE REPORT HAS NOT BEEN REISSUED BY ARTHER ANDERSEN LLP, NOR HAS ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP PROVIDED A CONSENT TO THE INCLUSION OF ITS REPORT IN THIS FORM 10-K.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

To the Shareholders of Penn Virginia Corporation:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Penn Virginia Corporation (a Virginia corporation) and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2001. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Penn Virginia Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2001, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

Arthur Andersen LLP

Houston, Texas

February 18, 2002

Page 44


PENN VIRGINIA CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(in thousands, except share data)

   

Year Ended December 31,


     
   

2002


   

2001


   

2000


 

Revenues

               

Oil and condensate

  

$

8,246

 

  

$

3,762

 

  

$

832

 

Natural gas

  

 

62,552

 

  

 

53,263

 

  

 

46,019

 

Coal royalties

  

 

31,358

 

  

 

32,365

 

  

 

24,308

 

Timber

  

 

1,640

 

  

 

1,732

 

  

 

2,388

 

Dividends

  

 

—  

 

  

 

198

 

  

 

2,646

 

Gain (loss) on the sale of properties

  

 

(5

)

  

 

492

 

  

 

24,795

 

Other

  

 

7,166

 

  

 

4,759

 

  

 

5,010

 

   


  


  


   

 

110,957

 

  

 

96,571

 

  

 

105,998

 

Expenses

               

Lease operating

  

 

12,754

 

  

 

9,284

 

  

 

7,629

 

Exploration

  

 

7,733

 

  

 

11,832

 

  

 

5,660

 

Taxes other than income

  

 

6,804

 

  

 

5,433

 

  

 

3,648

 

General and administrative

  

 

21,440

 

  

 

15,297

 

  

 

11,350

 

Impairment of oil and gas properties

  

 

796

 

  

 

33,583

 

  

 

—  

 

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

  

 

30,639

 

  

 

19,579

 

  

 

12,027

 

   


  


  


   

 

80,166

 

  

 

95,008

 

  

 

40,314

 

Operating Income

  

 

30,791

 

  

 

1,563

 

  

 

65,684

 

Other income (expense)

               

Interest expense

  

 

(2,116

)

  

 

(2,453

)

  

 

(7,926

)

Interest income

  

 

2,038

 

  

 

1,602

 

  

 

1,458

 

Gain on the sale of securities

  

 

—  

 

  

 

54,688

 

  

 

—  

 

Other

  

 

1

 

  

 

14

 

  

 

14

 

   


  


  


Income from continuing operations before minority interest and income taxes and discontinued operations

  

 

30,714

 

  

 

55,414

 

  

 

59,230

 

Minority interest

  

 

11,896

 

  

 

1,763

 

  

 

—  

 

Income tax expense

  

 

6,935

 

  

 

19,314

 

  

 

19,965

 

   


  


  


Income from continuing operations

  

 

11,883

 

  

 

34,337

 

  

 

39,265

 

Income from discontinued operations (including gain on sale and net of taxes)

  

 

221

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

   


  


  


Net Income

  

$

12,104

 

  

$

34,337

 

  

$

39,265

 

   


  


  


Income from continuing operations per share, basic

  

$

1.33

 

  

$

3.92

 

  

$

4.76

 

Income from discontinued operations per share, basic

  

 

0.02

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

   


  


  


Net income per share, basic

  

$

1.35

 

  

$

3.92

 

  

$

4.76

 

   


  


  


Income from continuing operation per share, diluted

  

$

1.32

 

  

$

3.86

 

  

$

4.69

 

Income from discontinued operations per share, diluted

  

 

0.02

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

   


  


  


Net income per share, diluted

  

$

1.34

 

  

$

3.86

 

  

$

4.69

 

   


  


  


Weighted average shares outstanding, basic

  

 

8,930

 

  

 

8,770

 

  

 

8,241

 

Weighted average shares outstanding, diluted

  

 

8,974

 

  

 

8,896

 

  

 

8,371

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. PENN VIRGINIA CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (in thousands, except share data) December 31, 2000 1999 Assets Current assets Cash and cash equivalents $ 735 $ 657 Accounts receivable 12,926 6,880 Current portion of long-term notes receivable 981 816 Current deferred income taxes - 155 Other 652 813 Total current assets 15,294 9,321 Investments 44,080 67,816 Long-term notes receivable 2,427 3,518 Property and Equipment Oil and gas properties (successful efforts method) 174,504 185,048 Other property and equipment 83,534 82,772 258,038 267,820 Less: Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization 52,922 76,553 Net property and equipment 205,116 191,267 Other assets 1,849 2,089 Total assets $ 268,766 $274,011 Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity Current liabilities Current maturities of long-term debt $ 740 $ 34 Accounts payable 2,609 1,570 Accrued liabilities 7,154 5,470 Current deferred income taxes 136 - Taxes on income 7,296 - Total current liabilities 17,935 7,074 Other liabilities 5,486 5,854 Deferred income taxes 26,683 28,265 Long-term debt 47,500 78,475 Commitments and contingencies (Note 16) Shareholders' equity Preferred stock of $100 par value- Authorized 100,000 shares; none issued - - Common stock of $6.25 par value - 16,000,000 shares authorized; 8,921,866 shares issued 55,762 55,762 Paid-in capital 8,100 8,096 Retained earnings 92,718 60,860 Accumulated other comprehensive income 26,606 42,017 183,186 166,735 Less: 524,108 shares in 2000 and 498,238 in 1999 of common stock held in treasury, at cost 10,974 11,142 Unearned compensation - ESOP 1,050 1,250 Total shareholders' equity 171,162 154,343 Total liabilities and shareholders' equity $268,766 $ 274,011

PENN VIRGINIA CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except share data)

   

December 31,


   

2002


   

2001


Assets

         

Current assets

         

Cash and cash equivalents

  

$

13,341

 

  

$

9,621

Accounts receivable

  

 

20,366

 

  

 

12,334

Current portion of long-term notes receivable

  

 

527

 

  

 

599

Price risk management assets

  

 

—  

 

  

 

3,674

Other

  

 

1,503

 

  

 

1,105

   


  

Total current assets

  

 

35,737

 

  

 

27,333

   


  

Property and equipment

         

Oil and gas properties (successful efforts method)

  

 

383,360

 

  

 

335,494

Other property and equipment

  

 

265,180

 

  

 

117,789

   


  

   

 

648,540

 

  

 

453,283

Less: Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization

  

 

102,588

 

  

 

72,095

   


  

Net property and equipment

  

 

545,952

 

  

 

381,188

Restricted U.S. Treasury Notes

  

 

—  

 

  

 

43,387

Other assets

  

 

4,603

 

  

 

5,194

   


  

Total assets

  

$

586,292

 

  

$

457,102

   


  

Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity

         

Current liabilities

         

Current maturities of long-term debt

  

$

52

 

  

$

1,235

Accounts payable

  

 

5,670

 

  

 

3,987

Accrued liabilities

  

 

16,508

 

  

 

10,762

Price risk management liabilities

  

 

1,621

 

  

 

—  

   


  

Total current liabilities

  

 

23,851

 

  

 

15,984

Other liabilities

  

 

12,674

 

  

 

8,877

Deferred income taxes

  

 

62,154

 

  

 

55,861

Long-term debt

  

 

106,887

 

  

 

46,887

Minority interest

  

 

192,770

 

  

 

144,039

Commitments and contingencies (Note 20)

         

Shareholders’ equity

         

Preferred stock of $100 par value – authorized 100,000 shares; none issued

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

Common stock of $6.25 par value – 16,000,000 shares authorized; 8,946,651

         

and 8,921,866 shares issued at December 31, 2002 and 2001 respectively

  

 

55,915

 

  

 

55,762

Paid-in capital

  

 

11,436

 

  

 

9,869

Retained earnings

  

 

123,189

 

  

 

119,125

Accumulated other comprehensive income

  

 

(1,661

)

  

 

1,756

   


  

   

 

188,879

 

  

 

186,512

Less: 23,765 shares of common stock held in treasury, at cost on December 31, 2001

  

 

—  

 

  

 

599

Unearned compensation and ESOP

  

 

923

 

  

 

459

   


  

Total shareholders’ equity

  

 

187,956

 

  

 

185,454

   


  

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

  

$

586,292

 

  

$

457,102

   


  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. PENN VIRGINIA CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (in thousands, except share data) Accumulated Other Shares Common Paid-in Retained Comprehensive Outstanding Stock Capital Earnings Income Balance at 12/31/97 8,274,326 $ 55,634 $8,431 $51,813 $63,500 Dividends paid ($0.90 per share) - - - (7,480) - Stock issued as compensation 5,357 - 26 - - Exercise of stock options 87,133 128 (114) - - Allocation of ESOP shares - - 98 - - Net income - - - 9,591 - Other comprehensive income, net of tax - - - - 2,485 Balance at 12/31/98 8,366,816 55,762 8,441 53,924 65,985 Dividends paid ($0.90 per share) - - - (7,568) - Stock issued as compensation 7,878 - (13) - - Exercise of stock options 48,934 - (365) - - Allocation of ESOP shares - - 33 - - Net income - - - 14,504 - Other comprehensive loss, net of tax - - - - (23,968) Balance at 12/31/99 8,423,628 55,762 8,096 60,860 42,017 Dividends paid ($0.90 per share) - - - (7,407) - Purchase of treasury stock (363,430) - - - - Stock issued as compensation 11,163 - - - - Exercise of stock options 326,397 - (63) - - Allocation of ESOP shares - - 67 - - Net income - - - 39,265 - Other comprehensive loss, net of tax - - - - (15,411) Balance at 12/31/2000 8,397,758 $55,762 $8,100 $92,718 $26,606
Continued from above table Unearned Total Treasury Compensation Stockholders' Comprehensive Stock ESOP Equity Income (Loss) Balance at 12/31/97 $(14,024) $(1,650) $163,704 $19,077 Dividends paid ($0.90/share) - - (7,480) Stock issued as compensation 120 - 146 Exercise of stock options 1,501 - 1,515 Allocation of ESOP shares - 200 298 Net income - - 9,591 $ 9,951 Other comprehensive income, net of tax _ _ 2,485 2,485 Balance at 12/31/98 (12,403) (1,450) 170,259 12,076 Dividends paid ($0.90/share) - - (7,568) Stock issued as compensation 176 - 163 Exercise of stock options 1,085 - 720 Allocation of ESOP shares - 200 233 Net income - - 14,504 $14,504 Other comprehensive loss, net of tax - - (23,968) (23,968) Balance at 12/31/99 (11,142) (1,250) 154,343 $ (9,464) Dividends paid ($0.90/share) - - (7,407) Purchase of treasury stock (6,761) - (6,761) Stock issued as compensation 226 - 226 Exercise of stock options 6,703 - 6,640 Allocation of ESOP shares _ 200 267 Net income - - 39,265 $ 39,265 Other comprehensive loss, net of tax - - (15,411) (15,411) Balance at 12/31/2000 $(10,974) $ (1,050) $171,162 $ 23,854

Page 46


PENN VIRGINIA CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(in thousands, except share data)

                    

Accumulated

               

Total

       
                    

Other

         

Unearned

     

Stockholders’

       
   

Shares

   

Common

  

Paid-in

   

Retained

     

Comprehensive

   

Treasury

     

Compensation

     

Comprehensive

     

Comprehensive

 
   

Outstanding


   

Stock


  

Capital


   

Earnings


     

Income


   

Stock


     

And ESOP


     

Equity


     

Income (Loss)


 

Balance at December 31, 1999

  

8,423,628

 

  

$

55,762

  

$

8,096

 

  

$

60,860

 

    

$

42,017

 

  

$

(11,142

)

    

$

(1,250

)

    

$

154,343

 

    

$

(9,464

)

Dividends paid ($0.90 per share)

  

—  

 

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

 

  

 

(7,407

)

    

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

    

 

—  

 

    

 

(7,407

)

       

Purchase of treasury stock

  

(363,430

)

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

    

 

—  

 

  

 

(6,761

)

    

 

—  

 

    

 

(6,761

)

       

Stock issued as compensation

  

11,163

 

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

    

 

—  

 

  

 

226

 

    

 

—  

 

    

 

226

 

       

Exercise of stock options

  

326,397

 

  

 

—  

  

 

(63

)

  

 

—  

 

    

 

—  

 

  

 

6,703

 

    

 

—  

 

    

 

6,640

 

       

Allocation of ESOP shares

  

—  

 

  

 

—  

  

 

67

 

  

 

—  

 

    

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

    

 

200

 

    

 

267

 

       

Net income

  

—  

 

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

 

  

 

39,265

 

    

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

    

 

—  

 

    

 

39,265

 

    

 

39,265

 

Other comprehensive loss, net of tax

  

—  

 

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

    

 

(15,411

)

  

 

—  

 

    

 

—  

 

    

 

(15,411

)

    

 

(15,411

)

   

  

  


  


    


  


    


    


    


Balance at December 31, 2000

  

8,397,758

 

  

 

55,762

  

 

8,100

 

  

 

92,718

 

    

 

26,606

 

  

 

(10,974

)

    

 

(1,050

)

    

 

171,162

 

    

 

23,854

 

Dividends paid ($0.90 per share)

  

—  

 

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

 

  

 

(7,930

)

    

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

    

 

—  

 

    

 

(7,930

)

       

Purchase of treasury stock

  

(33,991

)

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

         

 

(638

)

    

 

—  

 

    

 

(638

)

       

Stock issued as compensation

  

8,281

 

  

 

—  

  

 

142

 

  

 

—  

 

    

 

—  

 

  

 

188

 

    

 

—  

 

    

 

330

 

       

Exercise of stock options

  

526,053

 

  

 

—  

  

 

1,417

 

  

 

—  

 

    

 

—  

 

  

 

11,216

 

    

 

—  

 

    

 

12,633

 

       

Allocation of ESOP shares

  

—  

 

  

 

—  

  

 

210

 

  

 

—  

 

    

 

—  

 

  

 

(391

)

    

 

591

 

    

 

410

 

       

Net income

  

—  

 

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

 

  

 

34,337

 

    

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

    

 

—  

 

    

 

34,337

 

    

 

34,337

 

Other comprehensive loss, net of tax

  

—  

 

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

    

 

(24,850

)

  

 

—  

 

    

 

—  

 

    

 

(24,850

)

    

 

(24,850

)

   

  

  


  


    


  


    


    


    


Balance at December 31, 2001

  

8,898,101

 

  

 

55,762

  

 

9,869

 

  

 

119,125

 

    

 

1,756

 

  

 

(599

)

    

 

(459

)

    

 

185,454

 

    

 

9,487

 

Dividends paid ($0.90 per share)

  

—  

 

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

 

  

 

(8,040

)

    

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

    

 

—  

 

    

 

(8,040

)

       

Purchase of treasury stock

  

(15,202

)

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

    

 

—  

 

  

 

(557

)

    

 

—  

 

    

 

(557

)

       

Stock issued as compensation

  

6,752

 

  

 

8

  

 

84

 

  

 

—  

 

    

 

—  

 

  

 

157

 

    

 

—  

 

    

 

249

 

       

Penn Virginia Resource Partners, L.P. units issued as compensation, net

  

—  

 

  

 

—  

  

 

806

 

  

 

—  

 

    

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

    

 

(664

)

    

 

142

 

       

Exercise of stock options

  

57,000

 

  

 

145

  

 

470

 

  

 

—  

 

    

 

—  

 

  

 

999

 

    

 

—  

 

    

 

1,614

 

       

Allocation of ESOP shares

  

—  

 

  

 

—  

  

 

207

 

  

 

—  

 

    

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

    

 

200

 

    

 

407

 

       

Net income

  

—  

 

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

 

  

 

12,104

 

    

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

    

 

—  

 

    

 

12,104

 

    

 

12,104

 

Other comprehensive loss, net of tax

  

—  

 

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

    

 

(3,417

)

  

 

—  

 

    

 

—  

 

    

 

(3,417

)

    

 

(3,417

)

   

  

  


  


    


  


    


    


    


Balance at December 31, 2002

  

8,946,651

 

  

$

55,915

  

$

11,436

 

  

$

123,189

 

    

$

(1,661

)

  

$

—  

 

    

$

(923

)

    

$

187,956

 

    

$

8,687

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements PENN VIRGINIA CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (in thousands) Year ended December 31, 2000 1999 1998 Cash flows from operating activities: Net income $39,265 $14,504 $9,591 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided (used) by operating activities: Depreciation, depletion and amortization 12,027 8,393 7,162 Impairment of oil and gas properties - - 4,641 Gain on the sale of property and equipment (24,795) (280) (65) Deferred income taxes 7,006 2,805 923 Tax benefit from stock option exercises 1,049 86 170 Dry hole and unproved leasehold expense 3,154 1,115 58 Other 140 (1,284) (2,753) 37,846 25,339 19,727 Changes in operating assets and liabilities: Accounts receivable (6,046) (1,198) 1,721 Other current assets 161 (133) (136) Accounts payable and accrued liabilities 2,723 604 (1,277) Taxes on income 7,296 (576) 432 Other assets and liabilities (240) 1,105 (1,060) Net cash flows provided by operating activities 41,740 25,141 19,407 Cash flows from investing activities: Proceeds from the sale of securities - - 17 Proceeds from the sale of property & equipment 55,208 299 79 Payments received on long-term notes receivable 926 1,670 2,253 Proved properties acquired (35,999) (13,921) (3,351) Lease acquisitions (788) (32,793) (3,512) Capital expenditures (22,656) (13,937 (13,806) Net cash flows used in investing activities (3,309) (58,682) (18,320) Cash flows from financing activities: Dividends paid (7,407) (7,568) (7,480) Proceeds from borrowings 33,240 44,500 9,100 Repayment of borrowings (63,509) (3,990) (5,100) Purchases of treasury stock (6,761) - - Issuance of stock 6,084 1,031 1,787 Net cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities (38,353) 33,973 (1,693) Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 78 432 (606) Cash and cash equivalents-beginning of year 657 225 831 Cash and cash equivalents - end of year $ 735 $657 $ 225 Supplemental disclosures: Cash paid during the year for: Interest $8,304 $2,980 $2,065 Income taxes $4,614 $2,100 $1,100 Noncash investing activities: Note receivable for sale of property and equipment $ - $ 1,255 $ - Note receivable exchanged for: Other property and equipment $ - $ - $2,954 Other liabilities $ - $ - $1,296 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Page 47


PENN VIRGINIA CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)

   

Year ended December 31,


 
   

2002


   

2001


   

2000


 

Cash flows from operating activities:

               

Net income

  

$

12,104

 

  

$

34,337

 

  

$

39,265

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided (used) by operating activities:

               

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

  

 

30,639

 

  

 

19,579

 

  

 

12,027

 

Impairment of oil and gas properties

  

 

796

 

  

 

33,583

 

  

 

—  

 

Loss (gain) on the sale of property and equipment

  

 

5

 

  

 

(492

)

  

 

(24,795

)

Gain on sale of securities

  

 

—  

 

  

 

(54,688

)

  

 

—  

 

Deferred income taxes

  

 

8,133

 

  

 

(1,888

)

  

 

7,006

 

Tax benefit from stock option exercises

  

 

230

 

  

 

2,933

 

  

 

1,049

 

Dry hole and unproved leasehold expense

  

 

2,255

 

  

 

8,953

 

  

 

3,154

 

Minority interest

  

 

11,896

 

  

 

1,763

 

  

 

—  

 

Noncash interest expense

  

 

666

 

  

 

285

 

  

 

112

 

Other

  

 

1,074

 

  

 

194

 

  

 

28

 

   


  


  


   

 

67,798

 

  

 

44,559

 

  

 

37,846

 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

               

Accounts receivable

  

 

(5,695

)

  

 

592

 

  

 

(6,046

)

Other current assets

  

 

(646

)

  

 

(2,041

)

  

 

161

 

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

  

 

6,849

 

  

 

4,986

 

  

 

2,723

 

Taxes on income

  

 

—  

 

  

 

(7,296

)

  

 

7,296

 

Other assets and liabilities

  

 

(2,518

)

  

 

3,391

 

  

 

(240

)

   


  


  


Net cash flows provided by operating activities

  

 

65,788

 

  

 

44,191

 

  

 

41,740

 

   


  


  


Cash flows from investing activities:

               

Proceeds from the sale of securities

  

 

—  

 

  

 

57,525

 

  

 

—  

 

Proceeds from the sale of property and equipment

  

 

1,319

 

  

 

1,416

 

  

 

55,208

 

Payments received on long-term notes receivable

  

 

555

 

  

 

1,052

 

  

 

926

 

Sale of restricted U. S. Treasury Notes

  

 

43,387

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

Purchase of restricted U.S. Treasury Notes

  

 

—  

 

  

 

(43,387

)

  

 

—  

 

Additions to property and equipment

  

 

(144,741

)

  

 

(196,038

)

  

 

(59,443

)

   


  


  


Net cash flows used in investing activities

  

 

(99,480

)

  

 

(179,432

)

  

 

(3,309

)

   


  


  


Cash flows from financing activities:

               

Dividends paid

  

 

(8,040

)

  

 

(7,930

)

  

 

(7,407

)

Distributions paid to minority interest holders of subsidiary

  

 

(13,787

)

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

Proceeds from borrowings

  

 

22,046

 

  

 

147,895

 

  

 

33,240

 

Repayment of borrowings

  

 

(10,729

)

  

 

(191,400

)

  

 

(63,509

)

Proceeds from Penn Virginia Resource Partners, L.P. revolver

  

 

47,500

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

Proceeds from Penn Virginia Resource Partners, L.P. term loan

  

 

—  

 

  

 

43,387

 

  

 

—  

 

Proceeds from initial public offering, net

  

 

—  

 

  

 

142,373

 

  

 

—  

 

Purchases of treasury stock

  

 

(557

)

  

 

(638

)

  

 

(6,761

)

Purchase of units of Penn Virginia Resource Partners, L.P.

  

 

(1,067

)

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

Issuance of stock

  

 

2,046

 

  

 

10,440

 

  

 

6,084

 

   


  


  


Net cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities

  

 

37,412

 

  

 

144,127

 

  

 

(38,353

)

   


  


  


Net increase in cash and cash equivalents

  

 

3,720

 

  

 

8,886

 

  

 

78

 

Cash and cash equivalents – beginning of year

  

 

9,621

 

  

 

735

 

  

 

657

 

   


  


  


Cash and cash equivalents – end of year

  

$

13,341

 

  

$

9,621

 

  

$

735

 

   


  


  


Supplemental disclosures:

               

Cash paid during the year for:

               

Interest (net of amount capitalized)

  

$

1,213

 

  

$

3,131

 

  

$

8,304

 

Income taxes

  

$

125

 

  

$

28,772

 

  

$

4,614

 

Noncash additions to property and equipment:

               

Issuance of Penn Virginia Resource Partners, L.P. units for acquisitions

  

$

50,920

 

  

$

—  

 

  

$

—  

 

Working capital and assumed liabilities for acquisitions, net

  

$

3,805

 

  

$

—  

 

  

$

—  

 

Deferred tax liabilities related to acquisition, net

  

$

—  

 

  

$

43,137

 

  

$

—  

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Page 48


PENN VIRGINIA CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. Nature of Operations

Penn Virginia Corporation ("(“Penn Virginia"Virginia” or the "Company"“Company”) exploresis an independent energy company that is engaged in two primary lines of business. We explore for, developsdevelop and producesproduce crude oil, condensate and natural gas in the eastern and southern portions of the United States. In addition, we conduct our coal operations through our ownership in Penn Virginia Resource Partners, L.P. (the “Partnership” or “PVR”); a Delaware limited partnership. See Note 2 (Penn Virginia Resource Partners, L.P.).

The Company owns land and mineral rightsPartnership enters into leases with various third-party operators for the right to mineable and merchantablemine coal reserves and timber locatedon the Partnership’s property in central Appalachia. The coal reservesexchange for royalty payments. Coal royalty revenues under non-Peabody Leases are leased to various operators who mine and market the coal. Penn Virginia collects royalties based on the lessee'shigher of a percentage of the gross sales price or a fixed price per ton of coal sold, with pre-established minimum monthly or annual payments. Under the Peabody leases, coal royalty revenues are based on fixed royalty rates which escalate annually, also with pre-established monthly minimums. The Partnership also sells timber growing on its land and provides fee-based infrastructure facilities to certain lessees to enhance coal production and to generate additional coal services revenues.

2. Penn Virginia Resource Partners, L.P.

Penn Virginia Resource Partners, L.P. was formed in July 2001 to own and operate the coal land management business of Penn Virginia.

The Partnership completed its initial public offering of 7,475,000 common units at a price of $21.00 per unit on October 30, 2001. Total proceeds for the 7,475,000 units were $157.0 million before offering costs and underwriters’ commissions. Effective with the closing of the initial public offering, Penn Virginia, through its wholly owned subsidiaries, received 174,880 common units, 7,649,880 subordinated units and a 2 percent partnership interest in the ownership of the Partnership. In addition, concurrent with the closing of the initial public offering, the Partnership borrowed $43.4 million under its term loan credit facility with PNC Bank, National Association and other lenders.

In conjunction with the formation of the Partnership, Penn Virginia contributed to the Partnership net assets totaling $39.1 million. Concurrent with the initial public offering, the Partnership paid $141.5 million to Penn Virginia for repayment of debt and the purchase of 975,000 common units held by Penn Virginia. The Partnership’s note receivable from Penn Virginia was forgiven as well as the remaining portion of the Partnership’s note payable to Penn Virginia.

The common units have preferences over the subordinated units with respect to cash distributions, accordingly, we accounted for the sale of reserves. Timberthe Partnership units as a sale of a minority interest. At the time our subordinated units convert to common units, we will recognize any gain or loss computed at that time, as paid-in capital. Our subordinated units automatically convert to common units on September 30, 2006, but a portion of the subordinated units may convert after September 30, 2004 if the Partnership meets certain financial tests, namely operating surpluses that exceed the minimum quarterly distributions.

In December 2002, the Partnership acquired approximately 120 million tons of coal reserves from subsidiaries of Peabody Energy Corporation (“Peabody”). In conjunction with the acquisition, the Partnership issued 1,522,325 common units and 1,240,833 Class B common units, of which 293,700 Class B common units are held in escrow pending certain title transfers. All Class B common units share in income and distributions on the same basis as the common units, but they are not listed on the New York Stock Exchange. Subject to the approval of our common unitholders, the Class B common units will automatically convert into an equal number of common units; however, if the conversion is solddenied, Peabody, as holder of the Class B units, would have the right to receive 115 percent of the amount of distributions paid on the common units. Adoption of the proposed conversion requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at a special meeting of unitholders to be held in competitive bid sales involving individual parcels and also on a contract basis, where2003, provided that the total votes cast represent over 50 percent in interest of all common units entitled to vote.

The general partner of the Partnership is Penn Virginia pays independent contractors to harvest timber while the Company directly markets the product. 2.Resource GP, LLC (the “general partner”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Penn Virginia.

3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Penn Virginia, Corporation and all wholly-owned subsidiaries. The Company ownssubsidiaries, and operates itsthe Partnership in which we have an approximate 45 percent ownership interest as of December 31, 2002. Penn Virginia Resource GP, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Penn Virginia, serves as the Partnership’s sole general partner and controls the Partnership. We own and operate

Page 49


our undivided oil and gas properties and manages its coal reserves through itsour wholly-owned subsidiaries. The Company accountsWe account for itsour undivided interest in oil and gas properties using the proportionate consolidation method, whereby the Company'sour share of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses is included in the appropriate classification in the financial statements. Intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. In the opinion of management, all adjustments have been reflected that are necessary for a fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements. Certain amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year'syear’s presentation. New Accounting Standards In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities." SFAS No. 133, as amended by SFAS No. 137 and SFAS No. 138, establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, (collectively referred to as derivatives) and for hedging activities. It requires an entity to recognize all derivatives as either assets or liabilities in the statement of financial position and measure those instruments at fair value. If certain conditions are met, a derivative may be specifically designated as (a) a hedge of the exposure to changes in the fair value of a recognized asset or liability or an unrecognized firm commitment, (b) a hedge of the exposure to changes in the fair value of the exposure to variable cash flows of a forecasted transaction, or (c) a hedge of the foreign currency exposure of a net investment in a foreign operation, an unrecognized firm commitment, an available-for-sale security, or a foreign currency denominated forecasted transaction. Special accounting for qualifying hedges allows a derivative's gains and losses to offset related results on the hedged item in the Company's statement of income. The adoption of SFAS No. 133 on January 1, 2001 did not have a material impact on the Company's financial position or results of operations. In December 1999, the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101, "Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements' ("SAB No. 101"). SAB No. 101, as amended, summarizes the SEC's views in applying generally accepted accounting principles to revenue recognition in financial statements. The adoption of SAB No. 101 on October 1, 2000 did not have a material effect on the Company's financial position or results of operations.

Use of Estimates

Preparation of the accompanying consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities in the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash and Cash equivalents The Company considersequivalents/Restricted U.S. Treasury Notes

We consider all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. As of December 31, 2001, the Partnership had restricted cash in the form of U.S. Treasury Notes, which were used to secure the Partnership’s term loan facility. See Note 11 (Long-Term Debt). In 2002, the Partnership sold the U.S. Treasury Notes and used the proceeds to purchase property and equipment.

Investments Investments consist

During 2001 and 2000, we held investments that consisted of publicly traded equity securities. The Company classifies itsWe classify our equity securities as available-for-sale. Available-for-sale securities are recorded at fair value based upon market quotations. Unrealized holding gains and losses, net of the related tax effect, on available-for-salethese securities are excluded from earnings and are reported as a separate component of stockholders' equity until realized.stockholders’ equity. See Note 18 (Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income). A decline in the market value of any available-for-sale security below cost that is deemed other than temporary, is charged to earnings in the period it occurs resulting in the establishment of a new cost basis for the security. Dividend income is recognized when earned.received. Realized gains and losses for securities classified as available- for-saleavailable-for-sale are included in earnings and are derived using the specific identification method for determining the cost of securities sold. NotesSee Note 5 (Investments and Dividend Income).

Note Receivable Notes

The note receivable areis recorded at cost and adjusted for amortization of discounts. Discounts are amortized over the life of the notesnote receivable using the effective interest rate method.

Oil and Gas Properties The Company uses

We use the successful efforts method of accounting for itsour oil and gas operations. Under this method of accounting, costs to acquire mineral interests in oil and gas properties and to drill and equip development wells including(including development dry holes,holes) are capitalized and to drillamortized on a unit-of-production basis over the remaining life of proved developed reserves and equipproved reserves, respectively. Cost of drilling exploratory wells are initially capitalized, and later charged to expense upon determination that find proved reservesthe well does not justify commercial development. Other exploratory costs, including annual delay rentals and geological and geophysical costs, are capitalized. Capitalized costs of producing oil and gas fields are amortized using the unit-of-production method based on estimates of proved oil and gas reserves on a field-by- field basis. Oil and gas reserve quantities represent estimates only and there are numerous uncertainties inherent in the estimation process. Actual future production may be materially different from amounts estimated and such differences could materially affect future amortization of proved properties. Estimated costs (net of salvage value) of plugging and abandoning oil and gas wells are reported as additional depreciation and depletioncharged to expense using the units-of-production method. when incurred.

The costs of unproved leaseholds, incuding capitalized interest, are capitalized pending the results of exploration efforts. During 2002 and 2001, interest costs associated with non-producing leases were capitalized for the period activities were in progress to bring projects to their intended use. We capitalized $1.0 million and $1.1 million of interest costs in 2002 and 2001, respectively. No interest costs were capitalized in 2000. Unproved leasehold costs are assessed periodically, on a property-by-property basis, and a loss is recognized to the extent, if any, the cost of the property has been impaired. As unproved leaseholds are determined to be productive, the related costs are transferred to proved leaseholds. Exploratory costs including exploratory dry holes, annual delay rental and geological and geophysical costs are charged to expense when incurred.

Other Property and Equipment

Other property and equipment is carried at cost and includes expenditures for additions and improvements, which substantially increase the productive lives of existing assets. Maintenance and repair costs are expensed as incurred. Depreciation of property and equipment is generally computed using the straight- linestraight-line method over their estimated useful lives, varying from 3 years to 20 years. Coal in place isproperties are depleted on an area-by-area basis at a rate based upon the cost of the mineral properties and estimated mineableproven and merchantableprobable tonnage therein. When an asset is retired or sold, its cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts. The difference between undepreciated cost and proceeds from disposition is recorded as a gain or loss.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets The Company reviews its

We review our long-lived assets to be held and used, including proved oil and gas properties accounted for usingand the successful efforts method of accounting,Partnership’s coal properties, whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of those assets may not be recoverable. An impairment loss must be recognized when the carrying amount of an asset exceeds the sum of the undiscounted estimated future cash flows. In this circumstance, the Companywe would recognize an impairment loss equal to the difference between the carrying value and the fair value of the asset.

Page 50


Fair value is estimated to be the expected present value of expected future net cash flows from proved reserves, discounted utilizing a risk-adjustedrisk-free interest rate of return. commensurate with the remaining lives for the respective oil and gas properties.

Concentration of Credit Risk

Substantially all of the Company'sour accounts receivable at December 31, 20002002 result from oil and gas sales and joint interest billings to third party companies in the oil and gas industry. This concentration of customers and joint interest owners may impact the Company'sour overall credit risk, either positively or negatively, in that these entities may be similarly affected by changes in economic or other conditions. In determining whether or not to require collateral from a customer or joint interest owner, we analyze the Companyentity’s net worth, cash flows, earnings and credit ratings. Receivables are generally not collateralized. Historical credit losses incurred on receivables have not been significant.

Substantially all of the Partnership’s accounts receivable at December 31, 2002, result from billings to third party companies in the coal industry. This concentration of customers may impact the Partnership’s overall credit risk, either positively or negatively, in that these entities may be similarly affected by changes in economic or other conditions. In determining whether or not to require collateral from a lessee, the Partnership analyzes the entity'sentity’s net worth, cash flows, earnings and credit ratings. Receivables are generally not collateralized. Historical credit losses incurred by the CompanyPartnership on receivables have not been significant.

Risk Factors

Our revenues, profitability, cash flow and future growth rates are substantially dependent upon the price of and demand for natural gas and crude oil and to a lesser extent coal. Prices for natural gas and crude oil are subject to wide fluctuations in response to relatively minor changes in the supply of and demand for natural gas and crude oil, market uncertainty and a variety of additional factors that are beyond our control. We are also dependent upon the continued success of our exploratory drilling program. Other factors that could affect revenues, profitability, cash flow and future growth rates include the inherent uncertainties in crude oil, natural gas and coal reserves, hedging of our crude oil and natural gas production with derivative instruments, the ability to replace crude oil, natural gas and coal reserves, and finance future capital spending requirements.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments The Company's

Our financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities, accounts receivable, notes receivables, U.S. Treasury Notes, accounts payable and long-term debt. The carrying values of cash, marketable securities, accounts receivables, andU.S. Treasury Notes, accounts payables, and long-term debt approximate fair value. See Note 5 for a discussion of notes receivable. Price Risk Management Activities The Company, from time to time, enters into derivative financial instruments to mitigate its exposure to natural gas price volatility. The derivative financial instruments, which are placed with a major financial institution the Company believes is a minimum credit risk, take the form of swaps with purchased options. Through December 31, 2000, the derivative financial instruments were designated as hedges and realized gains and losses from the Company's price risk management activities were recognized in natural gas revenues when the associated production occurs. Effective January 1, 2001, any derivative financial instruments will be accounted for in accordance with SFAS 133, as amended by SFAS 137 and SFAS 138. The fair value of open derivative financial instruments is determined by comparing the New York Mercantile Exchange forward prices at year-end with the appropriate location differential adjustment to the contractual prices designated in the derivative financial instruments. The Company had no outstanding derivative financial instrumentsnotes receivable at December 31, 2000 or 1999. The fair value of the Company's open derivative contracts at December 31, 19982002 and 2001 was $0.1 million. $3.4 million and $4.6 million, respectively.

Revenues

Oil and Gas NaturalGas.Oil and gas sales revenues generally are recorded using the entitlement method in which the Company recognizes its ownership interest inrecognized when crude oil and natural gas production as revenue.volumes are produced and sold for our account. Each working interest owner in a well generally has the right to a specific percentage of production, althoughand often actual production sold mayfor any particular owner will differ from antheir ownership percentage. Using entitlement accounting, a receivable is recorded when under-production occurs and deferred revenue is recognized when over-production occurs. When, under contract terms, these differences are settled in cash, revenues are adjusted accordingly.

Coal RoyaltiesRoyalties. Coal royalty income isrevenues are recognized on the basis of tons of coal sold by the Company'sPartnership’s lessees and the corresponding revenue from those sales. AllMost coal leases are based on minimum monthly or annual payment,payments, a minimum dollar royalty per ton and/or a percentage of the gross sales price.

Coal Services.Coal services revenues are recognized when lessees use the Partnership’s facilities for the processing and transportation of coal. Coal services revenues consist of fees collected from the Partnership’s lessees for the use of the Partnership’s loadout facility, coal preparation plant, dock loading facility. Revenues associated with coal services for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001 were approximately $1.7 million for both years, and are included in other revenues.

Timber.Timber Timberrevenues are recognized as timber is sold in competitive bid sales involving individual parcels and also on a contract basis whereby Penn Virginia payswhere independent contractors harvest and sell the timber and, from time to time, in a competitive bid process involving sales of standing timber on individual parcels. Title and risk of loss pass to the independent contractors upon the execution of the contract. In addition, if the contractors do not harvest the timber whilewithin the Company directly marketsspecified time period, the product. Timbertitle of the timber reverts back to the Partnership with no refund of original payment.

Minimum Rentals. Most of the Partnership’s lessees must make minimum monthly or annual payments that are generally recoupable over certain time periods. These minimum payments are recorded as deferred income. If the lessee recoups a minimum payment through production, the deferred income attributable to the minimum payment is recognized whenas coal royalty revenues. If a lessee fails to meet its minimum production for certain pre-determined time periods (the recoupment period), the timber has been sold. deferred income attributable to the minimum payment is recognized as minimum rental revenues. Revenues associated with minimum rentals are included in other revenues.

Page 51


Income Tax The Company accounts

We account for income taxes in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 109, "AccountingAccounting for Income Taxes."Taxes. This statementStatement requires a company to recognize deferred tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in a company'scompany’s financial statements or tax returns. Using this method, deferred tax liabilities and assets are determined based on the difference between the financial statement carrying amounts and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates. 3.

Stock-based Compensation

We have stock compensation plans that allow, among other grants, incentive and nonqualified stock options to be granted to key employees and officers and nonqualified stock options to be granted to directors. See Note 17 (Stock Compensation and Stock Ownership Plans). We account for those plans under the recognition and measurement principles of APB Opinion No. 25,Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related Interpretations. No stock-based employee compensation cost related to stock options is reflected in net income, as all options granted under those plans had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share if we had applied the fair value recognition provision of SFAS No. 123,Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, to stock-based employee options.

   

Year ended December 31,


 
   

2002


   

2001


   

2000


 

Net income, as reported

  

$

12,104

 

  

$

34,337

 

  

$

39,265

 

Add: Stock-based employee compensation expense included in reported net income related to restricted units and director compensation, net of related tax effects

  

 

424

 

  

 

215

 

  

 

147

 

Less: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects

  

 

(1,268

)

  

 

(900

)

  

 

(320

)

   


  


  


Pro forma net income

  

$

11,260

 

  

$

33,652

 

  

$

39,092

 

   


  


  


Net income per share

               

Basic – as reported

  

$

1.35

 

  

$

3.92

 

  

$

4.76

 

   


  


  


Basic – pro forma

  

$

1.26

 

  

$

3.84

 

  

$

4.74

 

   


  


  


Diluted – as reported

  

$

1.34

 

  

$

3.86

 

  

$

4.69

 

   


  


  


Diluted – pro forma

  

$

1.25

 

  

$

3.78

 

  

$

4.67

 

   


  


  


New Accounting Standards

In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 143,Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations, which addresses financial accounting and reporting for obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the associated asset retirement costs. The Standard applies to legal obligations associated with the retirement of long-lived assets that result from the acquisition, construction, development or normal use of the asset.

SFAS No. 143 requires that the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation be recognized in the period in which it is incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. The fair value of the liability is also added to the carrying amount of the associated asset and this additional carrying amount is depreciated over the life of the asset. The liability is accreted at the end of each period through charges to operating expense. If the obligation is settled for other than the carrying amount of the liability, we will recognize a gain or loss on settlement.

We will adopt the provisions of SFAS No. 143 effective January 1, 2003. We identified all required asset retirement obligations and determined the fair value of these obligations on the date of adoption. The determination of fair value was based upon regional market and specific well or mine type information. In conjunction with the initial application of SFAS No. 143, it is expected we will record a cumulative-effect of change in accounting principle, net of taxes, of approximately $0.5 to $1.5 million as an increase to income, which will be reflected in the Company’s results of operations for 2003. In addition, it is expected we will record an asset retirement obligation of approximately $2.3 to $3.3 million.

Effective January 1, 2002 we adopted SFAS No. 144,Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. This Statement supersedes SFAS No. 121,Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of, and the accounting and reporting provisions of APB No. 30,Reporting the Results of Operations – Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions, for the

Page 52


disposal of a segment of a business. SFAS No. 144 addresses financial accounting and reporting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets. See Note 15 (Discontinued Operations) for current year disclosures related to our adoption.

In April 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 145,Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections. This Statement rescinds SFAS No. 4,Reporting Gains and Losses from Extinguishment of Debt, which required all gains and losses from extinguishment of debt to be aggregated and, if material, classified as an extraordinary item of debt to be aggregated and, if material, classified as an extraordinary item, net of income taxes. As a result, the criteria in Accounting Principles Board Opinion (APB) Opinion No. 30 will now be used to classify those gains and losses. Any gain or loss on the extinguishment of debt that was classified as an extraordinary item in prior periods presented that does not meet the criteria in APB Opinion No. 30 for classification as an extraordinary item shall be reclassified. The provisions of this Statement are effective for fiscal years beginning after January 1, 2003. The initial adoption of SFAS No. 145 did not have a material effect on the financial position, results of operations or liquidity of the Company.

In June 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146,Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities. This Statement requires the recognition of costs associated with exit or disposal activities when they are incurred rather than at the date of a commitment to an exit or disposal plan. The provisions of this Statement are effective for exit or disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002.

In November 2002, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 45 ( FIN 45),Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of the Indebtedness of Others, which clarifies the requirements of SFAS No. 5,Accounting for Contingencies, relating to a guarantor’s accounting for and disclosures of certain guarantees issued. FIN 45 requires enhanced disclosures for certain guarantees. It also will require certain guarantees that are issued or modified after December 31, 2002, including certain third-party guarantees, to be initially recorded on the balance sheet at fair value. For guarantees issued on or before December 31, 2002, liabilities are recorded when and if payments become probable and estimable. The financial statement recognition provisions are effective prospectively, and the Company cannot reasonably estimate the impact of adopting FIN 45 until guarantees are issued or modified in future periods, at which time their results will be initially reported in the financial statements

4. Acquisitions

Oil and Dispositions In May 2000, Penn Virginia successfully completedgas

On January 22, 2003, we acquired a 25 percent non-operated working interest in properties located in a producing field in south Texas. Proved reserves of 31.8 billion cubic feet equivalent of (unaudited) were acquired in a cash transaction with a private investor group for $32.5 million. The acquisition, which was effective January 1, 2003, was financed with the purchaseCompany’s existing credit facility. Nine wells are currently producing and comprise approximately one-third of the total proved reserves acquired. As of January 22, 2003, daily production net to the Company was approximately 11.4 million cubic feet (MMcf) of natural gas reservesand 570 barrels of oil, or 14.8 MMcf equivalents (unaudited). Additional wells are expected to be drilled over the next two to three years to fully develop the field.

On July 23, 2001, we acquired all of the outstanding stock of Synergy Oil & Gas, Inc., a Texas corporation. Synergy was a privately owned independent exploration and production company with operations primarily in the Texas onshore Gulf Coast and West Virginia and KentuckyTexas areas. Cash consideration for $34.7the stock was approximately $112 million, after closing adjustments. Additionally, in September 1999, the Company completed the purchase of fee mineral and lease rights for coal reserves and related assets in West Virginia for $30 million. Both acquisitions werewhich was funded by borrowings from the Company'sadvances under our revolving credit facility (the "Revolver") and accounted for at fair value.available cash on hand. The operations have been includedtotal purchase price was allocated to the assets purchased and the liabilities assumed in the Company's statementSynergy transaction based upon the fair values on the date of incomeacquisition, as of the closing date. follows (in thousands):

Value of oil and gas properties acquired

  

$

157,120

 

Net assets acquired, excluding oil and gas properties

  

 

351

 

Deferred income tax liability

  

 

(45,271

)

   


Cash paid, net of cash acquired

  

$

112,200

 

   


Page 53


The following unaudited pro formaPro Forma results of operations have been prepared as though the acquisitionsacquisition had been completed on January 1, 1999.2000. The unaudited pro formaPro Forma results of operations for the years ended December 31, 20002001 and 19992000 are as follows (in thousands, except share data): 2000 1999 (Unaudited) Revenues $83,546 $56,290 Netincome $39,729 $15,229 Net income per share, diluted $ 4.75 $1.80

   

2001


  

2000


Revenues

  

$

114,629

  

$

128,127

Net income

  

$

40,026

  

$

33,773

Net income per share, diluted

  

$

4.50

  

$

4.03

Coal Royalty and Land Management

In December 2000,2002, the Company sold oilPartnership acquired two properties containing approximately 120 million tons of coal reserves from Peabody for 1,522,325 million common units, 1,240,833 million Class B common units (a combined common unit value of $57.0 million) and gas properties$72.5 million in cash. The acquisition includes approximately $6.1 million, or 293,700 Class B units, which are currently held in escrow pending certain title transfers. As a result of the units held in escrow, approximately five million tons of coal reserves and 293,700 Class B common units were not included in property, plant and equipment or partners’ capital, respectively, at December 31, 2002. The Class B common units will be converted to common units upon approval by the common unitholders. Approximately two-thirds of the reserves are located in KentuckyNew Mexico, which Peabody will continue to operate as a surface mining operation. Approximately one third of the acquired reserves are in northern West Virginia, which Peabody will also continue to operate. Each set of reserves is being leased back to Peabody for royalty rates which escalate annually over the life of the property’s production. As part of the transaction, Peabody will receive the right to share in cash distributed with respect to the general partner’s incentive distribution rights, if any, in exchange for additional properties Peabody may source to the Partnership in the future. The cash portion of the transaction was funded with long-term debt and West Virginia. Proceeds$26.4 million in proceeds from the sale totaled $54.3of U.S. Treasury notes. The acquired coal reserves had existing productive operations that have been included in the Partnership’s statements of income since the closing date.

In November 2002, the Partnership completed the acquisition of certain infrastructure-related equipment and other assets integral to mining on its Fork Creek property in West Virginia. The purchased assets included a 900-ton per hour coal preparation plant, a unit-train loading facility and a railroad-granted rebate on coal loaded through the facility. The Partnership acquired the assets from Pen Holdings, Inc. and its lessors for $5.1 million afterin cash, which was funded with the proceeds from the sale of U.S. Treasury notes, plus the assumption of approximately $2.4 million in reclamation liabilities and approximately $0.6 million of stream mitigation obligations. The Partnership is actively seeking a new lessee and, as is customary in its operations, intends to assign all reclamation liabilities to such lessee. These assets did not have existing productive operations.

In August 2002, the Partnership acquired the mineral rights to approximately 16 million tons of coal reserves (unaudited) located in West Virginia for $12.3 million. The acquisition, which was purchased from an independent private entity, was funded with the proceeds from the sale of U.S. Treasury notes. The acquired mineral rights had existing productive operations that have been included in the Partnership’s statements of income since the closing adjustments,date.

In June 2001, the Partnership completed a $33.1 million acquisition from Pen Holdings, Inc., an unrelated third party. The acquisition contained 53 million tons of coal reserves in West Virginia (unaudited). Theproperty had existing productive operations that have been included in the Partnership’s statements of income since the closing date.

The factors used by the Partnership to determine the fair market value of acquisitions include, but are not limited to, discounted future net cash flows on a risked-adjusted basis, geographic location, quality of resources, potential marketability and financial condition of the Company recognized a gain of $23.9 million ($14.2 million after tax.) 4.lessees.

5. Investments and Dividend Income The cost, gross unrealized holding gains and fair value

In April 2001, we sold 3.3 million shares of available-for-sale securities were as follows (in thousands): Gross Unrealized Holding Fair At December 31, 2000 Cost Gains Value Available-for-sale Norfolk Southern Corporation $2,839 $41,188 $44,027 Other - 53 53 $ 2,839 $41,241 $44,080 At December 31, 1999 Available-for-sale Norfolk Southern Corporation $2,839 $64,959 $67,798 Other - 18 18 $ 2,839 $64,977 $67,816
The Company owned 3,307,200 sharesthe common stock of Norfolk Southern Corporation and other stocks which had been classified as available-for-sale. The Norfolk Southern Corporation shares were sold at an average price of $17.39 per share. Proceeds from the sales, net of commissions, totaled approximately $57.4 million. We recorded a pre-tax gain on the stock at December 31, 2000. sale transactions of approximately $54.7 million.

Dividend income from the Company'sour investment in Norfolk Southern Corporation was $0.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2001 and $2.6 million for each of the three yearsyear ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998. The closing stock price for Norfolk Southern Corporation was $13.31 and $20.50 per share at2000.

Page 54


6. Notes Receivable

At December 31, 20002002, we had one note receivable outstanding, which relates to the sale of coal properties located in Virginia in 1986. The note has a stated interest rate of 6.0 percent per annum and had an original principal amount of $15.0 million pursuant to which we receive quarterly payments through July 1, 2005. In addition, we own a 50 percent residual interest in any royalty income generated from the coal properties sold which are mined after July 1, 2005.

At December 31, 2001, we had an additional note relating to the sale of property and equipment in 1999 respectively. 5. Notes Receivable The Company's notesfor which we received a $1.3 million note for a portion of the proceeds. This note was repaid in full in 2002.

Our note receivable areis collateralized by property and equipment. During 1999, the Company received a $1.3 million note receivable for a portion of the proceeds relating to a property and equipment sale. Maturities of notes receivable are as follows (in thousands): December 31, 2000 1999 Current $ 981 $ 816 Due after one year through five years 2,427 2,876 Thereafter - 642 $ 3,408 $4,334
The fair value of the Company's notes receivable at December 31, 2000 and 1999 was $6.1 million and $6.9 million, respectively. 6.

   

December 31,


   

2002


  

2001


Current

  

$

527

  

$

599

Due after one year through five years

  

 

1,274

  

 

1,757

   

  

Total

  

$

1,801

  

$

2,356

   

  

7. Property and Equipment

Property and equipment includes (in thousands): December 31, 2000 1999 Oil and gas properties $174,504 $185,048 Other property and equipment: Land 1,809 1,813 Timber 188 188 Coal properties 72,952 73,081 Other equipment 8,585 7,690 258,038 267,820 Less: Accumulated depreciation and depletion (52,922) (76,553) Net property and equipment $205,116 $191,267

   

December 31,


 
   

2002


   

2001


 

Oil and gas properties

          

Unproved

  

$

57,575

 

  

$

57,813

 

Proved

  

 

325,785

 

  

 

277,681

 

   


  


Total oil and gas properties

  

 

383,360

 

  

 

335,494

 

Other property and equipment:

          

Land and timber

  

 

1,979

 

  

 

1,961

 

Coal properties

  

 

244,702

 

  

 

106,270

 

Other equipment

  

 

18,499

 

  

 

9,558

 

   


  


Total property and equipment

  

 

648,540

 

  

 

453,283

 

Less: Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization

  

 

(102,588

)

  

 

(72,095

)

   


  


Net property and equipment

  

$

545,952

 

  

$

381,188

 

   


  


8. Impairment of Oil and Gas Properties

In accordance with SFAS No. 121,144,Accounting for the Company reviews its provedImpairment of Disposal or Long-Lived Assets,we review oil and gas properties and other long-lived assets for impairment wheneverwhen events and circumstances indicate a decline in the recoverability of theirthe carrying value. Invalue of such properties, such as a downward revision of the fourth quarter of 1998,reserve estimates. We estimate the Company estimated the expected future cash flows of its oil and gasexpected in connection with the properties and comparedcompare such future cash flows to the carrying amount of the oil and gas properties to determine if the carrying amount wasis recoverable. For certain oil and gas properties,When we find that the carrying amount exceededamounts of the properties exceed their estimated undiscounted future cash flows; thus, the Company adjustedflows, we adjust the carrying amount of the respective oil and gas properties to their fair value as determined by discounting theirits estimated future cash flows. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2002, we recognized a pretax charge of $0.8 million ($0.5 million after tax) related to the impairment of such properties. The factors used to determine fair value included, but were not limited to, estimates of proved reserves, future commodity pricing,prices, and timing of future production, estimates, anticipatedfuture capital expenditures and a discount rate commensurate with the Company's internalrisk-free interest rate reflective of return on itsthe lives remaining for the respective oil and gas properties. As

Due to a result,low commodity price environment at the Companyend of 2001, we recognized a noncashnon-cash pre-tax charge of $4.6$33.6 million ($3.721.8 million after tax) related to itsthe impairment of oil and gas properties in the fourth quarter of 1998.2001. There were no impairments of oil and gas properties in 2000.

Page 55


9. Price Risk Management Activities

From time to time, we enter into derivative financial instruments to mitigate our exposure to natural gas and crude oil price volatility. The derivative financial instruments, which are placed with major financial institutions that we believe are minimum credit risks, take the form of costless collars and swaps. All derivative financial instruments are recognized in the financial statements at fair value in accordance with SFAS No. 133, as amended by SFAS No. 137 and SFAS No. 138.

All derivative instruments are recorded on the balance sheet at fair value. If the derivative does not qualify as a hedge or is not designated as a hedge, the gain or loss on the derivative is recognized currently in earnings. To qualify for hedge accounting, the derivative must qualify either as a fair value hedge, cash flow hedge or foreign currency hedge. Currently, we are utilizing only cash flow hedges and the remaining discussion will relate exclusively to this type of derivative instrument. All hedge transactions are subject to our risk management policy, which has been reviewed and approved by the Board of Directors.

We formally document all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as its risk-management objective and strategy for undertaking various hedge transactions. This process includes linking all derivatives that are designated as cash flow hedges to forecasted transactions. We also formally assess, both at inception of the hedge and on an ongoing basis, whether the derivatives that are used in hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in cash flows of hedged transactions. We measure hedge effectiveness on a period basis. When it is determined that a derivative is not highly effective as a hedge, or that it has ceased to be a highly effective hedge, we discontinue hedge accounting prospectively.

When hedge accounting is discontinued because it is probable that a forecasted transaction will not occur, the derivative will continue to be carried on the balance sheet at its fair value, and gains and losses that were accumulated in other long-lived assetscomprehensive income will be recognized in 2000earnings immediately. In all other situations in which hedge accounting is discontinued, the derivative will be carried at its fair value on the balance sheet, with changes in its fair value recognized in earnings prospectively.

Gains and losses on hedging instruments when settled are included in natural gas or 1999. 7.crude oil production revenues in the period that the related production is delivered.

The fair values of our hedging instruments are determined based on third party forward price quotes for NYMEX Henry Hub and West Texas Intermediate closing prices as of December 31, 2002. The following table sets forth our positions as of December 31, 2002:

   

Notional

           

Time Period


  

Quantities


     

Effective Floor/Ceiling Price


   

Fair Value


 
             

(in thousands)

 

Natural Gas

  

(MMbtu per Day

)

    

 

(Per Mmbtu

)

     

Costless collars

                

January 1 – March 31, 2003

  

10,000

 

    

$

3.01 / $5.01

 

  

$

(168

)

January 1 – September 30, 2003

  

5,000

 

    

$

3.37 / $5.05

 

  

 

(240

)

April 1 – October 31, 2003

  

5,000

 

    

$

2.92 / $4.42

 

  

 

(535

)

October 2003

  

3,000

 

    

$

3.50 / $5.00

 

  

 

(32

)

November 1, 2003 – April 30, 2004

  

8,000

 

    

$

3.50 / $5.00

 

  

 

(501

)

April 1 2003 – June 30, 2004

  

7,500

 

    

$

3.50 / $5.28

 

  

 

(445

)

Crude Oil

  

(Bbls per Day

)

            

Costless collars

                

January 1 – June 30, 2003

  

500

 

    

$

23.00 /$28.75

 

  

 

(144

)

              


Total

             

$

(2,065

)

              


Based upon our assessment of our derivative contracts at December 31, 2002, we reported (i) an approximate liability of $2.1 million and (ii) a loss in accumulated other comprehensive income of $1.3 million, net of related income taxes of $0.8 million. In connection with monthly settlements, we recognized net hedging losses in natural gas and oil revenues of $1.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2002. Based upon future oil and natural gas prices as of December 31, 2002, $1.6 million of hedging losses are expected to be realized within the next 12 months. The amounts ultimately realized will vary due to changes in the fair value of the open derivative contracts prior to settlement. We recognized net hedging gains of $1.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2001. We had no outstanding derivative financial instruments at December 31, 2000.

Page 56


As of February 14, 2003 our open commodity price risk management positions on average daily volumes were as follows:

Natural gas hedging positions

  

Costless Collars


  

Swaps


   

MMBtu

  

Price / MMBtu (a)


  

MMBtu

  

Price

   

Per Day


  

Floor


  

Ceiling


  

Per Day


  

/MMBtu


First Quarter 2003

  

15,000

  

$

3.15

  

$

5.05

  

3,164

  

$

4.70

Second Quarter 2003

  

21,500

  

$

3.39

  

$

5.36

  

3,399

  

$

4.70

Third Quarter 2003

  

21,500

  

$

3.39

  

$

5.36

  

2,570

  

$

4.70

Fourth Quarter 2003

  

19,500

  

$

3.49

  

$

5.46

  

2,034

  

$

4.70

First Quarter 2004

  

19,500

  

$

3.54

  

$

5.51

  

1,800

  

$

4.70

Second Quarter 2004

  

14,137

  

$

3.56

  

$

5.70

  

1,533

  

$

4.70

Third Quarter 2004

  

1,348

  

$

3.72

  

$

6.97

  

1,367

  

$

4.70

Fourth Quarter 2004

  

—  

  

$

—  

  

$

—  

  

1,234

  

$

4.70

First Quarter 2005 (January)

  

—  

  

$

—  

  

$

—  

  

1,100

  

$

4.70

(a)The costless collar natural gas prices per MMBtu per quarter include the effects of basis differentials, if any, that may be hedged.

Crude oil hedging positions

  

Costless Collars


  

Swaps


   

Barrels

  

Price /Barrel


  

Barrels

  

Price

   

Per Day


  

Floor


  

Ceiling


  

Per Day


  

/Barrel


First Quarter 2003

  

500

  

$

23.00

  

$

28.75

  

150

  

$

26.93

Second Quarter 2003

  

500

  

$

23.00

  

$

28.75

  

170

  

$

26.93

Third Quarter 2003

  

—  

  

$

—  

  

$

—  

  

250

  

$

26.76

Fourth Quarter 2003

  

—  

  

$

—  

  

$

—  

  

220

  

$

26.74

First Quarter 2004

  

—  

  

$

—  

  

$

—  

  

207

  

$

26.73

Second Quarter 2004

  

—  

  

$

—  

  

$

—  

  

193

  

$

26.71

Third Quarter 2004

  

—  

  

$

—  

  

$

—  

  

63

  

$

26.93

Fourth Quarter 2004

  

—  

  

$

—  

  

$

—  

  

57

  

$

26.93

First Quarter 2005 (January)

  

—  

  

$

—  

  

$

—  

  

50

  

$

26.93

10. Accrued Liabilities

Accrued expenses are summarized as follows (in thousands):

   

December 31,


   

2002


  

2001


Deferred income

  

$

2,829

  

$

—  

Taxes other than income

  

 

2,809

  

 

2,700

Accrued oil and gas royalties

  

 

2,513

  

 

2,042

Compensation

  

 

2,286

  

 

1,949

Accrued drilling costs

  

 

1,481

  

 

1,641

Accrued professional services

  

 

2,328

  

 

53

Post-retirement healthcare

  

 

160

  

 

160

Pension

  

 

140

  

 

140

Other

  

 

1,962

  

 

2,077

   

  

Total

  

$

16,508

  

$

10,762

   

  

Page 57


11. Long-Term Debt

Long-term debt consistsas of December 31, 2002 and 2001 consisted of the following (in thousands): December 31, 2000 1999 Revolving credit, variable rate of 8.1% at December 31, 2000, due in 2003 $47,500 $77,650 Line of credit 740 - Other - 859 48,240 78,509 Less: current maturities (740) (34) Total long-term debt $47,500 $78,475

   

December 31,


 
   

2002


   

2001


 

Penn Virginia revolving credit facility, variable rate of 2.8% at December 31, 2002, due in 2004

  

$

16,000

 

  

$

3,500

 

PVR revolving credit facility, variable rate of 3.2% at December 31, 2002, due in 2004

  

 

47,500

 

  

 

—  

 

PVR Term loan, variable rates of 1.9% to 2.7% at December 31, 2002, due in 2004

  

 

43,387

 

  

 

43,387

 

Line of credit

  

 

52

 

  

 

1,235

 

   


  


   

 

106,939

 

  

 

48,122

 

Less: current maturities

  

 

(52

)

  

 

(1,235

)

   


  


Total long-term debt

  

$

106,887

 

  

$

46,887

 

   


  


The aggregate maturities applicable to outstanding debt at December 31, 20002002 are $0.7$52 thousand in 2003 and $106.9 million in 2001 and $47.5 million in 2003.2004.

Penn Virginia Revolving Credit Facility The Company has an unsecured

We have a $150.0 million secured revolving credit facility (the "Revolver"“Revolver”) with a group of major U.S. banks. In 2000, the Revolver was increased from $120banks, and a borrowing base of $140 million, to $150 million. which expires in October 2004.

The Revolver is governed by a borrowing base calculation and will be redetermined semi-annually. The Company hasWe have the option to elect interest at (i) LiborLIBOR plus a Eurodollar margin ranging from 1001.375 to 150 basis points,1.875 percent, based on the percentage of the borrowing base outstanding or (ii) the greater of the prime rate or federal funds rate plus 50 basis points.a margin ranging from 0.375 to 0.875 percent. The weighted average interest rate on borrowings incurred during the year ended December 31, 2002 was approximately 3.0 percent. The Revolver allows for issuance of letters of credit whichthat are limited to no more than $10 million. At December 31, 2002, letters of credit issued were $0.3 million. The financial covenants require the Companyus to maintain levels of net worth, debt-to-capitalizationdebt-to-earnings and dividend limitation restrictions. We are currently in compliance with all of our covenants.

PVR Revolving Credit Facility

The CompanyPartnership has a $50.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility (the “Partnership Revolver”) with a group of major banks, which expires in October 2004. The Partnership has the option to elect interest at (i) LIBOR plus a Euro-rate margin ranging from 1.25 percent to 1.75 percent, based on certain financial data or (ii) the greater of the prime rate or federal funds rate plus 0.5 percent. The Partnership Revolver allows for working capital draws of no more than $5.0 million and issuance of letters of credit, which are limited to $2 million. At December 31, 2002, letters of credit issued were $1.6 million. The financial covenants of the Partnership Revolver include, but are not limited to, maintaining: (i) a ratio of not more than 2.5:1.0 of total debt to consolidated EBITDA (as defined by the credit agreement) and (ii) a ratio of not less than 4.00:1.00 of consolidated EBITDA to interest. The Partnership is currently in compliance with all of its covenants.

PVR Term Loan

In conjunction with the PVR Revolver, the Partnership borrowed an additional $43.4 million in the form of a term loan. The term loan expires in October 2004. The Partnership has the option to elect interest at (i) LIBOR plus a Euro-rate margin 0.5 percent, based on certain financial data or (ii) the greater of the prime rate or federal funds rate plus 0.5 percent. The term loan was originally secured with U.S. Treasuries, but is currently unsecured, after the Treasuries were used to fund the Peabody Acquisition. The term loan is subject to the same covenants as the Revolver. The Partnership is currently in compliance with all of its covenants.

Line of Credit The Company has

We have a $5 million line of credit with a financial institution due in December 2001,March 2003, renewable annually. The Company hasWe have an option to elect either a fixed rate LIBOR loan, floating rate LIBOR loan or base rate (as determined by the financial institution) loan. 8. Accrued Liabilities Accrued expenses are summarized as follows (in thousands): December 31, 2000 1999 Post employment benefits $ 317 $ 343 Compensation 1,421 715 Accrued oil and gas royalties 2,027 752 Taxes other than income 1,013 878 Gas imbalances 1,310 570 Accrued drilling costs 197 1,086 Other 869 1,126 $ 7,154 $5,470
9.

Anticipated PVR Refinancing

The Partnership is currently attempting to refinance up to $90 million of its credit facility borrowings with more permanent debt. This refinancing is expected to be completed by March 31, 2003. If the refinancing is not completed by March 31, 2002, PVR will be required to provide security for all borrowings against its credit facility and term loan.

Page 58


12. Income Taxes

The provision for income taxes from continuing operations is comprised of the following (in thousands): Year ended December 31, 2000 1999 1998 Current income taxes Federal $10,463 $1,525 $1,341 State 2,496 - 98 Total current 12,959 1,525 1,439 Deferred income taxes Federal 6,951 2,426 901 State 55 379 22 Total deferred 7,006 2,805 923 Total income tax expense $19,965 $ 4,330 $ 2,362

   

Year ended December 31,


   

 

2002

 

  

 

2001

 

  

 

2000

   


  


  

Current income taxes

              

Federal

  

$

(320

)

  

$

21,160

 

  

$

10,463

State

  

 

(878

)

  

 

42

 

  

 

2,496

   


  


  

Total current

  

 

(1,198

)

  

 

21,202

 

  

 

12,959

   


  


  

Deferred income taxes

              

Federal

  

 

5,236

 

  

 

(3,167

)

  

 

6,951

State

  

 

2,897

 

  

 

1,279

 

  

 

55

   


  


  

Total deferred

  

 

8,133

 

  

 

(1,888

)

  

 

7,006

   


  


  

Total income tax expense

  

$

6,935

 

  

$

19,314

 

  

$

19,965

   


  


  

The difference between the taxes computed by applying the statutory tax rate to income from operations before income taxes and the Company'sour reported income tax expense is as follows (in thousands): Year ended December 31, 2000 1999 1998 Computed at federal statutory tax rate $20,731 $6,592 $4,150 State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit 1,658 246 78 Dividends received deduction (648) (648) (648) Non-conventional fuel source credit (1,570) (1,471) (1,525) Percentage depletion (234) (414) (350) Other, net 28 25 657 Total income tax expense $19,965 $4,330 $2,362

   

Year ended December 31,


 
   

2002


   

2001


   

2000


 

Computed at federal statutory tax rate

  

$

6,586

 

  

35.0

%

  

$

18,777

 

  

35.0

%

  

$

20,731

 

  

35.0

%

State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit

  

 

1,312

 

  

7.0

%

  

 

859

 

  

1.6

%

  

 

1,658

 

  

2.8

%

Dividends received deduction

  

 

—  

 

  

—  

 

  

 

(49

)

  

(0.1

%)

  

 

(648

)

  

(1.1

%)

Non-conventional fuel source credit

  

 

(926

)

  

(4.9

%)

  

 

(721

)

  

(1.3

%)

  

 

(1,570

)

  

(2.7

%)

Other, net

  

 

(37

)

  

(0.2

%)

  

 

448

 

  

0.8

%

  

 

(206

)

  

(0.3

%)

   


  

  


  

  


  

Total Income tax expense

  

$

6,935

 

  

36.9

%

  

$

19,314

 

  

36.0

%

  

$

19,965

 

  

33.7

%

   


  

  


  

  


  

The principal components of the Company'sour net deferred income tax liability isare as follows (in thousands): December 31, 2000 1999 Deferred tax assets: Other long-term liabilities $1,908 $1,936 Alternative minimum tax credits 2,258 7,329 State tax loss carryforwards 925 938 Other 560 565 Total deferred tax assets 5,651 10,768 Deferred tax liabilities: Notes receivable (891) (1,169) Investments (14,437) (22,745) Oil and gas properties (14,789) (12,012) Other property and equipment (2,142) (1,823) Other (211) (1,129) Total deferred tax liabilities (32,470) (38,878) Net deferred tax liability (26,819) (28,110) Less: Net current deferred income tax asset (liability) (136) 155 Net non-current deferred tax liability $(26,683) $(28,265)

   

December 31,


 
   

2002


   

2001


 

Deferred tax assets:

          

Pension and post-retirement benefits

  

$

1,826

 

  

$

1,513

 

Deferred income – coal properties

  

 

965

 

  

 

1,294

 

Alternative minimum tax credits

  

 

—  

 

  

 

439

 

Net operating loss carryforwards

  

 

1,392

 

  

 

1,154

 

Other

  

 

1,058

 

  

 

74

 

   


  


Total deferred tax assets

  

 

5,241

 

  

 

4,474

 

Deferred tax liabilities:

          

Notes receivable

  

 

(668

)

  

 

(747

)

Investments

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

Oil and gas properties

  

 

(66,092

)

  

 

(56,675

)

Other property and equipment

  

 

(635

)

  

 

(2,108

)

Other

  

 

—  

 

  

 

(805

)

   


  


Total deferred tax liabilities

  

 

(67,395

)

  

 

(60,335

)

   


  


Net deferred tax liability

  

$

(62,154

)

  

$

(55,861

)

   


  


As of December 31, 2000, the Company had available2002, we have various net operating loss carryforwards for federal incomestate tax purposes alternative minimum tax credits of approximately $2.3 million which can be carried forward indefinitely as a credit. The Company has various state tax loss carryforwards of $11.5$27.7 million which, if unused, will expire from 2009 to 2020. 10.Pension2022.

Page 59


13. Pension Plans and Other Post-retirement Benefits The Company

We provide early retirement programs for eligible employees. Benefits are recorded based on the employee’s average annual compensation and its wholly-owned subsidiariesyearly services. We provided a noncontributory, defined benefit pension plan, which was frozen in 1996 and early retirement programs (the "Plans") for eligible employees. Benefits were based on the employee's average annual compensation and years of service. The Company sponsorsterminated in 2001.

We also sponsor a defined benefit post-retirement plan that covers employees hired prior to January 1, 1991 who retire from active service. The plan provides medical benefits for the retirees and dependents and life insurance for the retirees. The medical coverage is noncontributory for retirees who retired prior to January 1, 1991 and may be contributory for retirees who retireretired after December 31, 1990.

A reconciliation of the changes in the benefit obligations and fair value of assets for the two years ended December 31, 20002002 and 19992001 and a statement of the funded status at December 31, 20002002 and 19992001 is as follows (in thousands): Pension Post-retirement 2000 1999 2000 1999 Reconciliation of benefit obligation: Obligation - beginning of year $10,612 $11,701 $2,936 $3,112 Service cost 43 80 11 14 Interest cost 763 749 209 206 Benefits paid (1,087) (1,083) (324) (366) Actuarial (gain) loss 113 (754) 21 (129) Other 23 (81) - 99 Obligation - end of year 10,467 10,612 2,853 2,936 Reconciliation of fair value of plan assets: Fair value - beginning of year 10,594 10,468 1,578 1,698 Actual return on plan assets 223 982 (301) 221 Employer contributions 259 271 25 26 Participant contributions - - 5 8 Benefit payments (1,087) (1,083) (324) (366) Administrative expenses (48) (44) (8) (9) Fair value - end of year 9,941 10,594 975 1,578 Funded status: Funded status - end of year (526) (18) (1,878) (1,358) Unrecognized transition obligation 23 26 - - Unrecognized prior service cost 48 55 86 92 Unrecognized (gain) loss (308) (1,189) 118 (249) Net amount recognized $(763) $(1,126) $(1,674) $(1,515)

   

Pension


   

Post-retirement

Healthcare


 
   

2002


   

2001


   

2002


   

2001


 

Reconciliation of benefit obligation:

                    

Obligation – beginning of year

  

$

2,375

 

  

$

10,467

 

  

$

3,468

 

  

$

2,853

 

Service cost

  

 

—  

 

  

 

43

 

  

 

10

 

  

 

11

 

Interest cost

  

 

164

 

  

 

744

 

  

 

311

 

  

 

251

 

Benefits paid

  

 

(260

)

  

 

(1,754

)

  

 

(618

)

  

 

(577

)

Change in benefit assumption

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

1,039

 

  

 

—  

 

Settlements

  

 

—  

 

  

 

(7,879

)

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

Actuarial (gain) loss

  

 

98

 

  

 

797

 

  

 

750

 

  

 

930

 

Other

  

 

—  

 

  

 

(43

)

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

   


  


  


  


Obligation – end of year

  

 

2,377

 

  

 

2,375

 

  

 

4,960

 

  

 

3,468

 

   


  


  


  


Reconciliation of fair value of plan assets:

                    

Fair value – beginning of year

  

 

—  

 

  

 

9,941

 

  

 

518

 

  

 

975

 

Actual return on plan assets

  

 

—  

 

  

 

368

 

  

 

5

 

  

 

138

 

Settlements

       

 

(7,879

)

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

Employer contributions

  

 

260

 

  

 

259

 

  

 

96

 

  

 

10

 

Participant contributions

       

 

—  

 

  

 

11

 

  

 

11

 

Benefit payments

  

 

(260

)

  

 

(1,754

)

  

 

(609

)

  

 

(588

)

Administrative expenses

  

 

—  

 

  

 

(190

)

  

 

(21

)

  

 

(28

)

Transfer to 401 K

  

 

—  

 

  

 

(186

)

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

Reversion to Penn Virginia

  

 

—  

 

  

 

(559

)

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

   


  


  


  


Fair value – end of year

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

518

 

   


  


  


  


Funded status:

                    

Funded status – end of year

  

 

(2,377

)

  

 

(2,375

)

  

 

(4,960

)

  

 

(2,950

)

Unrecognized transition obligation

  

 

16

 

  

 

20

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

Unrecognized prior service cost

  

 

36

 

  

 

42

 

  

 

1,112

 

  

 

79

 

Unrecognized (gain) loss

  

 

491

 

  

 

405

 

  

 

1,559

 

  

 

930

 

   


  


  


  


Net amount recognized

  

$

(1,834

)

  

$

(1,908

)

  

$

(2,289

)

  

$

(1,941

)

   


  


  


  


Page 60


The following table provides the amounts recognized in the statements of financial position at December 31, 20002002 and 19992001 (in thousands): Pension Post-retirement 2000 1999 2000 1999 Accrued benefit liability $(1,199) $(1,542) $(1,674) $(1,515) Other long-term assets 71 81 - - Accumulated other comprehensive income 365 335 - - Obligation - end of year $(763) $(1,126) $(1,674) $(1,515)

   

Pension


   

Post-retirement Healthcare


 
   

2002


   

2001


   

2002


   

2001


 

Accrued benefit liability

  

$

(2,377

)

  

$

(2,375

)

  

$

(2,289

)

  

$

(1,941

)

Other long-term assets

  

 

52

 

  

 

62

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

Accumulated other comprehensive income

  

 

491

 

  

 

405

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

   


  


  


  


Obligation – end of year

  

$

(1,834

)

  

$

(1,908

)

  

$

(2,289

)

  

$

(1,941

)

   


  


  


  


The following table provides the components of net periodic benefit cost for the plans for the two years ended December 31, 20002002 and 19992001 (in thousands): Pension Post-retirement 2000 1999 2000 1999 Service cost $ 43 $80 $11 $14 Interest cost 763 749 209 206 Expected return on plan assets (963) (949) (42) (47) Amortization of prior service cost 6 6 6 7 Amortization of transitional obligation 3 4 - - Recognized actuarial (gain) loss (21) 13 - - Net periodic benefit cost $ (169) $ (97) $184 $ 180

   

Pension


   

Post-retirement Healthcare


 
   

2002


  

2001


   

2002


   

2001


 

Service cost

  

$

—  

  

$

43

 

  

$

10

 

  

$

11

 

Interest cost

  

 

164

  

 

745

 

  

 

311

 

  

 

251

 

Expected return on plan assets

  

 

—  

  

 

(901

)

  

 

(8

)

  

 

(23

)

Amortization of prior service cost

  

 

6

  

 

6

 

  

 

119

 

  

 

6

 

Amortization of transitional obligation

  

 

3

  

 

3

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

Recognized actuarial (gain) loss

  

 

12

  

 

8

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

32

 

   

  


  


  


Net periodic benefit cost

  

$

  185

  

$

(96

)

  

$

432

 

  

$

277

 

   

  


  


  


The assumptions used in the measurement of the Company'sour benefit obligation were as follows: Pension Post-retirement 2000 1999 2000 1999 Discount rate 7.50% 7.50% 7.50% 7.50 % Expected return on plan assets 9.50 9.50 3.00 3.00
Since the benefits accrued under the defined benefit plan were frozen in 1996, it is not necessary to assume a rate of compensation increase.

   

Pension


   

Post-retirement Healthcare


 
   

2002


   

2001


   

2002


   

2001


 

Discount rate

  

6.75

%

  

7.25

%

  

6.75

%

  

7.25

%

Expected return on plan assets

  

—  

 

  

9.50

 

  

—  

 

  

3.00

 

For measurement purposes, a 7.59.5 percent annual rate increase in the per capita cost of covered health care benefits was assumed for 2000.2002. The rate is assumed to decrease gradually to 5.55.0 percent for 20042011 and remain at that level thereafter.

Assumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts reported for post-retirement benefits. A one percent change in assumed health care cost trend rates would have the following effects for 20002002 (in thousands): One percent One percent increase decrease Effect on total of service and interest cost components $ 9 $ (8) Effect on post-retirement benefit obligation 126 (114)
11.

   

One percent

Increase


  

One percent

Decrease


 

Effect on total of service and interest cost components

  

$

14

  

$

(12

)

Effect on post-retirement benefit obligation

  

 

157

  

 

(144

)

Page 61


14. Other Liabilities

Other liabilities are summarized in the following table (in thousands): December 31, 2000 1999 Post-retirement health care $1,497 $1,312 Deferred income 2,749 2,793 Pension 1,059 1,402 Other 181 347 $ 5,486 $5,854
12.

   

December 31,


   

2002


  

2001


Reclamation/environmental liabilities

  

$

5,349

  

$

1,154

Post-retirement health care

  

 

2,129

  

 

1,781

Deferred income

  

 

2,488

  

 

3,658

Pension

  

 

2,237

  

 

2,234

Other

  

 

471

  

 

50

   

  

Total

  

$

12,674

  

$

8,877

   

  

15. Discontinued Operations

During the second quarter of 2002, we sold certain oil and gas properties, which included various interests in south Texas properties acquired in the third quarter of 2001. The operations of these properties were insignificant in 2001. The net carrying amount of properties sold was approximately $0.5 million. Accordingly, under the provisions of SFAS No. 144 the components of discontinued operations were as follows for the year ended December 31, 2002 (in thousands)

Production

     

Oil and condensate (Mbbls)

  

 

16

 

Natural gas (MMcf)

  

 

18

 

   


Total production (MMcfe)

  

 

114

 

Revenues

     

Natural gas

  

$

48

 

Oil and condensate

  

 

332

 

   


Total revenues

  

 

380

 

   


Expenses

     

Operating expenses

  

 

352

 

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

  

 

25

 

   


Total expenses

  

 

377

 

   


Income from discontinued operations

  

 

3

 

Gain on sale of properties

  

 

337

 

   


   

 

340

 

Income taxes

  

 

(119

)

   


Net income from discontinued operations

  

$

221

 

   


Page 62


16. Earnings Per Share

The following is a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators used in the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share ("EPS"(“EPS”) for net income for the three years ended December 31, 20002002 (in thousands, except per share data.) 2000 1999 1998 Net income $39,265 $14,504 $9,591 Weighted average shares, basic 8,241 8,406 8,310 Dilutive securities: Stock options 130 74 153 Weighted average shares, diluted 8,371 8,480 8,463 Net income per share, basic $ 4.76 $ 1.73 $ 1.15 Net income per share, diluted $ 4.69 $ 1.71 $ 1.13
Antidilutive stock options are precluded from the computation of diluted EPS; however, such options could potentially dilute basic EPS in the future. 13.Stock Option

   

2002


  

2001


  

2000


Income from continuing operations

  

$

11,883

  

$

34,337

  

$

39,265

Income from discontinued operations

  

 

221

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

   

  

  

Net income

  

$

12,104

  

$

34,337

  

$

39,265

   

  

  

Weighted average shares, basic

  

 

8,930

  

 

8,770

  

 

8,241

Effect of dilutive securities:

            

Stock options

  

 

44

  

 

126

  

 

130

   

  

  

Weighted average shares, diluted

  

 

8,974

  

 

8,896

  

 

8,371

   

  

  

Income from continuing operations per share, basic

  

$

1.33

  

$

3.92

  

$

4.76

Income from discontinued operations per share, basic

  

 

0.02

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

   

  

  

Net income per share, basic

  

$

1.35

  

$

3.92

  

$

4.76

   

  

  

Income from continuing operations per share, diluted

  

$

1.32

  

$

3.86

  

$

4.69

Income from discontinued operations per share, diluted

  

 

0.02

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

   

  

  

Net income per share, diluted

  

$

1.34

  

$

3.86

  

$

4.69

   

  

  

Page 63


17. Stock Compensation and Stock Ownership Plans Plans`

Stock OptionCompensation Plans The Company has

We have several stock optioncompensation plans (collectively known as the "Stock Option Plans"“Stock Compensation Plans”) whichthat allow, among other grants, incentive and nonqualified stock options to be granted to key employees and officers of the Company and nonqualified stock options to be granted to directors of the Company.directors. Options granted under the Stock OptionCompensation Plans may be exercised at any time after one year and prior to ten years following the grant, subject to special rules that apply in the event of death, retirement and/or termination of the employment of an optionee. The exercise price of all options granted under the Stock OptionCompensation Plans is at the fair market value of the Company'sCompany’s stock on the date of the grant. At December 31, 2002 there were approximately 134,000 and 416,000 shares available for issuance to directors and employees, respectively, pursuant to the Stock Compensation Plans.

The following table summarizes information with respect to the common stock options awarded under the Stock Option Plans and grants described above. 2000 1999 1998 Shares Weighted Shares Weighted Shares Weightd Under Avg.Exercise Under Avg.Exercise Under Avg.Exercise Options Price Options Price Options Price Outstanding, Beginning of year 1,014,500 $18.74 1,002,800 $18.65 1,036,500 $18.19 Granted 46,300 $16.65 91,800 $20.27 80,600 $25.06 Exercised 326,397 $17.13 49,000 $16.44 96,901 $18.53 Cancelled 9,000 $18.99 31,100 $23.84 17,399 $21.56 Outstanding, End of year 725,403 $19.38 1,014,500 $18.74 1,002,800 $18.65 Weighted average of fair value of options granted during the year $5.02 $6.02 $8.50

   

2002


  

2001


  

2000


   

Shares

Under

Options


    

Weighted Avg.

Exercise Price


  

Shares

Under

Options


  

Weighted Avg

Exercise Price


  

Shares

Under

Options


  

Weighted Avg

Exercise Price


Outstanding at beginning of year

  

359,450

    

$

25.97

  

725,403

  

$

19.38

  

1,014,500

  

$

18.74

Granted

  

113,400

    

$

36.91

  

160,100

  

$

32.02

  

46,300

  

$

16.65

Exercised

  

57,000

    

$

24.45

  

526,053

  

$

23.35

  

326,397

  

$

17.13

Cancelled

  

12,000

    

$

21.38

  

—  

  

 

—  

  

9,000

  

$

18.99

Outstanding at end of year

  

403,850

    

$

29.39

  

359,450

  

$

25.97

  

725,403

  

$

19.38

Weighted average of fair value of options granted during the year

       

$

10.17

     

$

10.55

     

$

5.02

The following table summarizes certain information regarding stockfair value of the options outstanding at December 31, 2000: Options Outstanding Options Exercisable Range of Number Weighted Avg. Weighted Number Weighted Exercise Outstanding Remaining Avg. Exercisable Avg. Price at Contractual Exercise at Exercise 12/31/00 Life Price 12/31/00 Price $15 to $19 382,203 6.5 $16.78 343,403 $16.61 $20 to $24 298,100 6.4 $21.59 298,100 $21.92 $25 to $30 45,100 6.9 $26.77 45,100 $26.77
The Company appliesgranted during 2002 is estimated on the intrinsic value method for reporting compensation expense pursuant to Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25 "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees" to its stock-based compensation plans. Had compensation expense fordate of grant using the Company's stock-based compensation plans been determined in accordanceBlack-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions: a) dividend yield of 2.37 percent to 2.66 percent, b) expected volatility of 28.6 percent, c) risk-free interest rate 3.8 percent and d) expected life of eight years.

The fair value method pursuantof the options granted during 2001 is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions: a) dividend yield of 2.71 percent to SFAS No. 123 "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation", the Company's pro forma net income2.92 percent, b) expected volatility of 32.3 percent, c) risk-free interest rate of 5.1 percent and earnings per share would have been as follows: 2000 1999 1998 Net Income (in thousands) $39,092 $14,111 $ 9,022 Earnings per share, basic $ 4.74 $ 1.68 $ 1.09 Earnings per share, diluted $ 4.67 $ 1.66 $ 1.07
d) expected life of eight years.

The fair value of the options granted during 2000 is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions: a) dividend yield of 5.2 percent to 5.4 percent, b) expected volatility of 37.0 percent, c) risk- freerisk-free interest rate of 6.9 percent to 7.0 percent and d) expected life of eight years.

The fair value of thefollowing table summarizes certain information regarding stock options granted during 1999 is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions: a) dividend yield of 4.4 percent to 4.6 percent, b) expected volatility of 38.6 percent, c) risk- free interest rate of 4.8 percent to 4.9 percent and d) expected life of eight years. The fair value of the options granted during 1998 is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions: a) dividend yield of 3.4 percent to 4.2 percent, b) expected volatility of 37.7 percent to 38.8 percent, c) risk-free interest rate of 4.7 percent to 5.7 percent and d) expected life of eight years. The effects of applying SFAS No. 123 in this pro forma disclosure are not indicative of future amounts. Employees'outstanding at December 31, 2002:

  

Options Outstanding


 

Options Exercisable


Range of

Exercise

Price


 

Number

Outstanding

at 12/31/02


    

Weighted Avg.

Remaining

Contractual Life


  

Weighted Avg.

Exercise

Price


 

Number

Exercisable

at 12/31/02


  

Weighted Avg.

Exercise

Price


$15 to $19

 

44,800

    

5.9

  

$17.76

 

44,800

  

$17.76

$20 to $24

 

88,500

    

4.9

  

$21.87

 

88,500

  

$21.87

$25 to $29

 

23,050

    

6.0

  

$27.09

 

23,050

  

$27.09

$30 to $34

 

145,300

    

8.8

  

$32.43

 

134,100

  

$32.27

$35 to $39

 

102,200

    

9.4

  

$37.19

 

—  

  

$ —  

Page 64


Employees’ Stock Ownership Plan

In 1996, the Board of Directors extended the Employees'Employees’ Stock Ownership Plan ("ESOP"(“ESOP”). All employees with one year of service are participants. The ESOP is designed to enable employees of the Company to accumulate stock ownership. While there are no employee contributions, participants receive an allocation of stock which has been contributed by the Company. Compensation costs are reported when such shares are released to employees. The ESOP borrowed $2.0 million from the Company in 1996 and used the proceeds to purchase treasury stock. Under the terms of the ESOP, the Companywe will make annual contributions over a 10-year period. At December 31, 2000,2002, the unearned portion of the ESOP of approximately ($1.10.3 million) was recordedis reported as a contra-equity accountcomponent of Shareholders’ Equity entitled "Unearned“Unearned Compensation-ESOP."

Shareholder Rights Plan

In February 1998, the Board of Directors adopted a Shareholder Rights Plan (the “Plan”) designed to prevent an acquirer from gaining control of the Company without offering a fair price to all shareholders. The Plan was amended in March 2002. Each Rightright entitles the holder to purchase from the Company one one-thousandth of a share of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock, $100 par value, at a price of $100 subject to adjustment. The Rightsrights are not exercisable or transferable apart from the common stock until ten days after a person or affiliated group has acquired or obtained the right to acquire fifteen percent or more or makes a tender offer for fifteen(or ten percent or more if such person or group has been deemed to an “adverse person” as defined in the Plan), of the Company'sour common stock. Each Rightright will entitle the holder, under certain circumstances, (such as a merger, acquisition of fifteen percent or more of common stock of the Company by the acquiring person or sale of fifty percent or more of the Company's assets or earning power), to acquire at half the value, either common stock of the Company, a combination of cash, other property, or common stock or other securities of the Company, or common stock of thean acquiring person. Any such event would also result in any Rightsrights owned beneficially by the acquiring person or its affiliates becoming null and void. The Rightsrights expire in February 2008 and are redeemable at any time until ten days following the time an acquiring person acquires fifteen percent or moreunder certain circumstances.

Restricted Units

The general partner granted 37,500 restricted units to directors and officers of the Company'sgeneral partner in 2002. A restricted unit entitles the grantee to receive a common stockunit upon the vesting of the restricted unit. Restricted units vest upon terms established by the Partnership Compensation Committee, but in no case earlier than the conversion to common units of the Partnership’s outstanding subordinated units. In addition, the restricted units will vest upon a change of control of the general partner or the Company. If a grantee’s employment with or membership on the Partnership’s Board of Directors of the general partner terminates for any reason, the grantee’s restricted units will be automatically forfeited unless, and to the extent, the compensation committee provides otherwise. Common units to be delivered upon the vesting of restricted units may be common units acquired by the general partner in the open market, common units already owned by the general partner, common units acquired by the general partner directly from the Partnership or any other person or any combination of the foregoing. The general partner will be entitled to reimbursement by the Partnership for the cost incurred in acquiring such common units. Distributions payable with respect to restricted units may, at $0.001 per Right. 14.the Partnership’s Compensation Committee’s request, be paid directly to the grantee or held by the Partnership and made subject to a risk of forfeiture during the applicable restriction period.

The following table summarizes information with respect to restricted units awarded by the general partner.

   

2002


   

Restricted

Units


  

Fair

Value


Outstanding at beginning of year

  

—  

  

$

—  

Granted

  

37,500

  

$

24.50

Vested

  

4,000

  

$

24.50

Forfeited

  

—  

  

 

—  

   
  

Outstanding at end of year

  

33,500

  

$

24.50

   
  

Page 65


18. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive income represents certain changes in equity during the reporting period, including net income and other comprehensive income, which includes, but is not limited to, unrealized gains from marketable securities, price risk management assets and minimum pension liability adjustments. Reclassification adjustments represent gains or losses from investments realized in net income for each respective year. For the three years ended December 31, 2000,2002, the components of accumulated other comprehensive income are as follows (in thousands): Accumulated Net unrealized Minimum other holding gain - pension comprehensive investments liability income Balance at December 31, 1997 $63,728 $ (228) $63,500 Unrealized holding gain, net of tax of $1,383 2,568 - 2,568 Reclassification adjustment, net of tax of $5 (9) - (9) Pension plan adjustment, net of tax of $40 - (74) (74) Balance at December 31, 1998 66,287 (302) 65,985 Unrealized holding gain, net of tax of $12,951 (24,052) - (24,052) Pension plan adjustment, net of tax of $46 - 84 84 Balance at December 31, 1999 42,235 (218) 42,017 Unrealized holding loss, net of tax of $8,308 (15,429) - (15,429) Pension plan adjustment, net of tax of $10 - 18 18 Balance at December 31, 2000 $ 26,806 $(200) $26,606
15.

   

Net unrealized

holding gain –

Investments


   

Price risk

management

assets


   

Minimum

pension

liability


   

Accumulated

other

comprehensive

income


 

Balance at December 31, 1999

  

$

42,235

 

  

$

—  

 

  

$

(218

)

  

$

42,017

 

Unrealized holding loss, net of tax of $8,308

  

 

(15,429

)

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

(15,429

)

Pension plan adjustment, net of tax of $10

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

18

 

  

 

18

 

   


  


  


  


Balance at December 31, 2000

  

 

26,806

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

(200

)

  

 

26,606

 

Investment holding gain, net of tax of $1,383

  

 

8,741

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

8,741

 

Investment reclassification adjustment, net of tax of $19,140

  

 

(35,547

)

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

(35,547

)

Price risk management unrealized gain, net of tax of $1,940

  

 

—  

 

  

 

3,603

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

3,603

 

Price risk management reclassification adjustment, net of tax of $853

  

 

—  

 

  

 

(1,584

)

  

 

—  

 

  

 

(1,584

)

Pension plan adjustment, net of tax of $34

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

(63

)

  

 

(63

)

   


  


  


  


Balance at December 31, 2001

  

 

—  

 

  

 

2,019

 

  

 

(263

)

  

 

1,756

 

Price risk management unrealized loss, net of tax of $2,160

  

 

—  

 

  

 

(4,012

)

  

 

—  

 

  

 

(4,012

)

Price risk management reclassification adjustment, net of tax of $350

  

 

—  

 

  

 

651

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

651

 

Pension plan adjustment, net of tax of $30

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

(56

)

  

 

(56

)

   


  


  


  


Balance at December 31, 2002

  

$

—  

 

  

$

(1,342

)

  

$

(319

)

  

$

(1,661

)

   


  


  


  


Page 66


19. Segment Information Penn Virginia's

Segment information has been prepared in accordance with SFAS No. 131Disclosure about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information. Under SFAS No. 131, operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available and is evaluated regularly by the chief decision maker, or decision-making group, in assessing performance. Our chief operating decision-making group consists of the Chief Executive Officer and other senior officials. This group routinely reviews and makes operating and resource allocation decisions among our oil and gas operations and its coal royalty and land management operations. Accordingly, our reportable segments are classified into two operating segments: as follows:

Oil and Gas - crude oil and natural gas exploration,development and production.

Coal Royalty and Land Management - the leasing of mineral rights and subsequent collection of royalties and the development and harvesting of timber. Coal Royalty and Land Corporate Oil and Gas Management and Other Consolidated (in thousands) December 31, 2000 Revenues $47,507 $31,051 $2,645 $81,203 Operating income (loss) 22,517 21,834 (3,510) 40,841 Total assets 142,613 80,923 45,230 268,766 Depreciation, depletion and amortization 9,883 2,047 97 12,027 Capital expenditures 58,677 485 281 59,443
Coal Royalty and Land Corporate Oil and Gas Management and Other Consolidated (in thousands) December 31, 1999 Revenues $22,942 $21,830 $2,645 $47,417 Operating income (loss) 5,889 16,380 (1,834) 20,435 Total assets 120,954 83,975 69,082 274,011 Depreciation, depletion and amortization 6,951 1,269 173 8,393 Capital expenditures 28,605 31,955 91 60,651 December 31, 1998 Revenues $21,106 $14,499 $2,647 $38,252 Operating income (loss) 260 10,549 (608) 10,201 Total assets 102,698 63,424 90,809 256,931 Depreciation, depletion and amortization 6,460 589 113 7,162 Capital expenditures 13,789 9,792 42 23,623
Revenues

All Other – primarily represents corporate functions.

   

Oil and Gas


   

Coal Royalty and Land Management


  

All

Other


   

Consolidated


 
   

(in thousands)

 

December 31, 2002

                   

Revenues

  

$

71,512

 

  

$

38,608

  

$

837

 

  

$

110,957

 

Operating costs and expenses

  

 

30,801

 

  

 

10,226

  

 

7,704

 

  

 

48,731

 

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

  

 

26,336

 

  

 

3,955

  

 

348

 

  

 

30,639

 

Impairment of oil and gas properties

  

 

796

 

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

 

  

 

796

 

   


  

  


  


Operating income (loss)

  

$

13,579

 

  

$

24,427

  

$

(7,215

)

  

 

30,791

 

   


  

  


     

Interest expense

                

 

(2,116

)

Interest income

                

 

2,038

 

Other

                

 

1

 

                 


Income before minority interest and taxes

                

$

30,714

 

                 


Total assets

  

$

314,284

 

  

$

266,576

  

$

5,432

 

  

$

586,292

 

Capital expenditures

  

$

51,581

 

  

$

92,817

  

$

343

 

  

$

144,741

 

December 31, 2001

                   

Revenues

  

$

57,778

 

  

$

37,513

  

$

1,280

 

  

$

96,571

 

Operating costs and expenses

  

 

26,914

 

  

 

9,271

  

 

5,661

 

  

 

41,846

 

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

  

 

16,418

 

  

 

3,084

  

 

77

 

  

 

19,579

 

Impairment of oil and gas properties

  

 

33,583

 

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

 

  

 

33,583

 

   


  

  


  


Operating income (loss)

  

$

(19,137

)

  

$

25,158

  

$

(4,458

)

  

 

1,563

 

   


  

  


     

Gain on sale of securities

                

 

54,688

 

Interest expense

                

 

(2,453

)

Interest income

                

 

1,602

 

Other

                

 

14

 

                 


Income before minority interest and taxes

                

$

55,414

 

                 


Total assets

  

$

289,379

 

  

$

162,638

  

$

5,085

 

  

$

457,102

 

Capital expenditures

  

$

161,295

 

  

$

33,669

  

$

1,074

 

  

$

196,038

 

December 31, 2000

                   

Revenues

  

$

71,405

 

  

$

30,189

  

$

4,404

 

  

$

105,998

 

Operating costs and expenses

  

 

15,107

 

  

 

8,327

  

 

4,853

 

  

 

28,287

 

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

  

 

9,883

 

  

 

2,047

  

 

97

 

  

 

12,027

 

   


  

  


  


Operating income (loss)

  

$

46,415

 

  

$

19,815

  

$

(546

)

  

 

65,684

 

   


  

  


     

Interest expense

                

 

(7,926

)

Interest income

                

 

1,458

 

Other

                

 

14

 

                 


Income before taxes

                

$

59,230

 

                 


Total assets

  

$

142,613

 

  

$

79,803

  

$

46,350

 

  

$

268,766

 

Capital expenditures

  

$

58,677

 

  

$

485

  

$

281

 

  

$

59,443

 

Page 67


Operating loss for the oil and gasOil Gas segment in 2001 includes a $33.6 million impairment on properties see Note 9 (Impairment of Oil and Gas Properties). Operating income for 2000 includeincludes a $23.9 million gain on asale of property sale. of $23.9 million.

Operating income is total revenue less operating expenses. Operating income does not include certain other income items, gain (loss) on sale of securities, unallocated general corporate expenses, interest expense, minority interest and income taxes. Identifiable assets are those assets used in the Company's operations in each segment. Corporate assets are principally cash and marketable securities.

For the year ended December 31, 2000,2002, two customers of the oil and gas segment accounted for $13.6$29.4 million, or 1326 percent, and $10.5$17.7 million, or 1016 percent, respectively, of the Company'sour consolidated net revenues. For the year ended December 31, 1999,2001, two customers of the oil and gas segment accounted for $9.6$20.8 million, or 2022 percent, and $6.9$11.4 million, or 1312 percent, respectively, of the Company'sour consolidated net revenues. 16.

20. Commitments and Contingencies

Rental Commitments

Minimum rental commitments under all non-cancelable operating leases, primarily real estate, in effect at December 31, 20002002 were as follows (in thousands): Year ending December 31, 2001 $ 454 2002 420 2003 346 2004 246 2005 77 Total minimum payments $ 1,543

Year ending December 31,


   

2003

  

$

2,855

2004

  

 

1,729

2005

  

 

1,508

2006

  

 

1,388

2007

  

 

601

   

Total minimum payments

  

$

8,081

   

Legal The Company is

We are involved, from time to time, in various legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. While the ultimate results of these proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, Company management believes these claims will not have a material effect on the Company's financial position, liquidity or operations. 17.

Environmental Compliance

Extensive federal, state and local laws govern oil and natural gas operations, regulate the discharge of materials into the environment or otherwise relate to the protection of the environment. Numerous governmental departments issue rules and regulations to implement and enforce such laws that are often difficult and costly to comply with and which carry substantial administrative, civil and even criminal penalties for failure to comply. Some laws, rules and regulations relating to protection of the environment may, in certain circumstances, impose “strict liability” for environmental contamination, rendering a person liable for environmental and natural resource damages and cleanup costs without regard to negligence or fault on the part of such person. Other laws, rules and regulations may restrict the rate of oil and natural gas production below the rate that would otherwise exist or even prohibit exploration or production activities in sensitive areas. In addition, state laws often require some form of remedial action to prevent pollution from former operations, such as closure of inactive pits and plugging of abandoned wells. The regulatory burden on the oil and natural gas industry increases its cost of doing business and consequently affects its profitability. These laws, rules and regulations affect our

Page 68


operations, as well as the oil and gas exploration and production industry in general. We believe that we are in substantial compliance with current applicable environmental laws, rules and regulations and that continued compliance with existing requirements will not have a material adverse impact on us. Nevertheless, changes in existing environmental laws or the adoption of new environmental laws have the potential to adversely affect our operations.

The operations of the Partnership’s lessees are subject to environmental laws and regulations adopted by various governmental authorities in the jurisdictions in which these operations are conducted. The terms of the Partnership’s coal property leases impose liability for all environmental and reclamation liabilities arising under those laws and regulations on the relevant lessees. The lessees are bonded and have indemnified the Partnership against any and all future environmental liabilities. The Partnership regularly visits the coal property leases to monitor its lessee’s compliance with environmental laws and regulations, as well as to review mining activities. Management believes that the Partnership’s lessees will be able to comply with existing regulations and does not expect any material impact on its financial condition or results of operations as a result of environmental regulations.

With respect to its unleased and inactive properties, the Partnership has some reclamation bonding requirements. In conjunction with the November 2002 purchase of equipment at the Fork Creek property, the Partnership assumed reclamation and mitigation liabilities of approximately $3.0 million. The Partnership is currently pursuing a potential lessee for this property and, as is customary in its operations, the Partnership intends to assign all reclamation liabilities to such lessee. As of December 31, 2002 and 2001, the Partnership’s environmental liabilities totaled $4.6 million and zero, respectively.

21. Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited)

Summarized Quarterly Financial Data:

   

2002

Quarters Ended


  

2001

Quarters Ended


 
   

Mar. 31


  

June 30


  

Sept. 30


  

Dec. 31


  

Mar. 31


  

June 30(a)


  

Sept. 30


  

Dec. 31(b)


 
   

(in thousands, except share data)

 

Revenues

  

$

24,383

  

$

25,648

  

$

28,754

  

$

32,172

  

$

27,121

  

$

24,741

  

$

24,031

  

$

20,678

 

Operating

                                 

Income (loss) (c)

  

$

8,778

  

$

7,076

  

$

7,949

  

$

6,988

  

$

16,958

  

$

13,461

  

$

6,841

  

$

(35,697

)

Net income

  

$

3,370

  

$

3,163

  

$

3,208

  

$

2,363

  

$

10,710

  

$

43,018

  

$

4,247

  

$

(23,638

)

Net income from continuing operations per share (d)

                                 

Basic

  

$

0.38

  

$

0.33

  

$

0.36

  

$

0.26

  

$

1.25

  

$

4.88

  

$

0.48

  

$

(2.66

)

Diluted

  

$

0.37

  

$

0.33

  

$

0.36

  

$

0.26

  

$

1.22

  

$

4.79

  

$

0.47

  

$

(2.63

)

Net income from per share (d)

                                 

Basic

  

$

0.38

  

$

0.35

  

$

0.36

  

$

0.26

  

$

1.25

  

$

4.88

  

$

0.48

  

$

(2.66

)

Diluted

  

$

0.37

  

$

0.35

  

$

0.36

  

$

0.26

  

$

1.22

  

$

4.79

  

$

0.47

  

$

(2.63

)

Weighted average shares outstanding:

                                 

Basic

  

 

8,909

  

 

8,927

  

 

8,944

  

 

8,945

  

 

8,549

  

 

8,820

  

 

8,869

  

 

8,890

 

Diluted

  

 

9,007

  

 

8,984

  

 

8,982

  

 

8,984

  

 

8,755

  

 

8,982

  

 

9,007

  

 

8,989

 

(a)Net income for the second quarter of 2001 included a $54.7 million ($35.6 million after tax) gain on the sale of Norfolk Southern Corporation Common Stock.
(b)Operating loss for the fourth quarter of 2001 included a $33.6 million impairment on oil and gas properties.
(c)Certain reclassifications have been made to conform to the current year presentation.
(d)The sum of the quarters may not equal the total of the respective year’s net income per share due to changes in the weighted average shares outstanding throughout the year.

Page 69


22. Supplementary Information on Oil and Gas Producing Activities (Unaudited)

The following supplementary information regarding the oil and gas producing activities of Penn Virginia is presented in accordance with the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and SFAS No. 69 "Disclosures“Disclosures about Oil and Gas Producing Activities"Activities”. The amounts shown include Penn Virginia'sour net working and royalty interestsinterest in all of itsour oil and gas operations.

Capitalized Costs Relating to Oil and Gas Producing Activities Year Ended December 31, 2000 1999 1998 (in thousands) Proved properties $64,107 $41,084 $35,842 Unproved properties 2,425 3,959 1,408 Wells, equipment and facilities 105,283 137,176 117,688 Support equipment 2,689 2,829 2,620 174,504 185,048 157,558 Accumulated depreciation and depletion (43,720) (69,495) (62,545) Net capitalized costs $ 130,784 $ 115,553 $ 95,013

   

Year Ended December 31,


 
   

2002


   

2001


   

2000


 
   

(in thousands)

 

Proved properties

  

$

73,606

 

  

$

75,152

 

  

$

64,107

 

Unproved properties

  

 

57,575

 

  

 

57,813

 

  

 

2,425

 

Wells, equipment and facilities

  

 

248,746

 

  

 

199,670

 

  

 

105,283

 

Support equipment

  

 

3,433

 

  

 

2,859

 

  

 

2,689

 

   


  


  


   

 

383,360

 

  

 

335,494

 

  

 

174,504

 

Accumulated depreciation and depletion

  

 

(86,586

)

  

 

(60,073

)

  

 

(43,720

)

   


  


  


Net capitalized costs

  

$

296,774

 

  

$

275,421

 

  

$

130,784

 

   


  


  


Costs Incurred in Certain Oil and Gas Activities Year Ended December 31, 2000 1999 1998 (in thousands) Proved property acquisition costs $35,999 $14,069 $3,351 Unproved property acquisition costs 917 2,551 206 Exploration costs 5,125 3,171 2,022 Development costs and other 18,561 9,398 8,698 Total costs incurred $ 60,602 $29,189 $14,277

   

Year Ended December 31,


   

2002


  

2001


  

2000


   

(in thousands)

Proved property acquisition costs

  

$

517

  

$

97,143

  

$

35,999

Unproved property acquisition costs

  

 

6,829

  

 

64,488

  

 

917

Exploration costs

  

 

7,843

  

 

13,814

  

 

5,125

Development costs and other

  

 

41,750

  

 

31,545

  

 

18,561

   

  

  

Total costs incurred

  

$

56,939

  

$

206,990

  

$

60,602

   

  

  

Costs for the year ended December 31, 2001, include deferred income taxes of $45.3 million provided for the book versus tax basis difference related to the acquired Synergy Oil and Gas properties, $27.2 million of which is included in proved property acquisition costs and $18.1 million is included in unproved property acquisition costs.

Results of Operations for Oil and Gas Producing Activities

The following schedule includes results solely from the production and sale of oil and gas and a noncashnon-cash charge for property impairments. It excludes corporate related general and administrative expenses and gains or losses on property dispositions. The income tax expense is calculated by applying the statutory tax rates to the revenues after deducting costs, which include depletion allowances and giving effect to oil and gas related permanent differences and tax credits. Year Ended December 31, 2000 1999 1998 (in thousands) Revenues $46,851 $21,847 $20,817 Production costs 7,097 5,092 4,746 Exploration costs 5,080 1,699 488 Depreciation and depletion 9,883 6,951 6,460 Impairment of oil and gas properties - - 4,641 24,791 8,105 4,482 Income tax expense 8,354 1,864 1,062 Results of operations $ 16,437 $ 6,241 $ 3,420

   

Year Ended December 31,


   

2002


  

2001


   

2000


   

(in thousands)

Revenues

  

$

71,178

  

$

57,024

 

  

$

46,851

Production expenses

  

 

15,390

  

 

10,069

 

  

 

7,226

Exploration expenses

  

 

7,614

  

 

11,514

 

  

 

5,080

Depreciation and depletion expense

  

 

26,361

  

 

16,418

 

  

 

9,883

Impairment of oil and gas properties

  

 

796

  

 

33,583

 

  

 

—  

   

  


  

   

 

21,017

  

 

(14,560

)

  

 

24,662

Income tax expense (benefit)

  

 

6,566

  

 

(5,817

)

  

 

8,309

   

  


  

Results of operations

  

$

14,451

  

$

(8,743

)

  

$

16,353

   

  


  

Page 70


Oil and Gas Reserves

The following schedule presents the estimated oil and gas reserves owned by Penn Virginia.us. This information includes Penn Virginia'sour royalty and net working interest share of the reserves in oil and gas properties. Net proved oil and gas reserves for the three years ended December 31, 20002002, were estimated by Wright and Company, Inc. All reserves are located in the United States.

There are many uncertainties inherent in estimating proved reserve quantities, and projecting future production rates and the timing of future development expenditures. In addition, reserve estimates of new discoveries are more imprecise than those of properties with a production history. Accordingly, these estimates are subject to change as additional information becomes available. Proved oil and gas reserves are the estimated quantities of crude oil, condensate and natural gas that geological and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be recoverable in future years from known reservoirs under existing economic and operating conditions at the end of the respective years. Proved developed oil and gas reserves are those reserves expected to be recovered through existing equipment and operating methods.

Net quantities of proved reserves and proved developed reserves during the periods indicated are set forth in the tables below: Proved Developed and Undeveloped Oil and Reserves Condensate Natural Gas (MBbls) (MMcf) MMcfe December 31, 1997 424 171,562 174,106 Revisions of previous estimates (53) (11,978) (12,296) Extensions, discoveries and - 7,885 7,885 other additions Production (30) (8,056) (8,236) Purchase of reserves - 4,495 4,495 Sale of reserves in place - (35) (35) December 31, 1998 341 163,873 165,919 Revisions of previous estimates 31 2,106 2,292 Extensions, discoveries and - 4,661 4,661 other additions Production (32) (8,679) (8,871) Purchase of reserves 19 23,237 23,351 December 31, 1999 359 185,198 187,352 Revisions of previous estimates 107 (1,893) (1,251) Extensions, discoveries and 19 30,987 31,101 other additions Production (31) (11,645) (11,831) Purchase of reserves 11 35,879 35,945 Sale of reserves in place (394) (64,279) (66,643) December 31, 2000 71 174,247 174,673 Proved Developed Reserves: December 31, 1998 313 118,146 120,024 December 31, 1999 326 138,283 140,239 December 31, 2000 71 145,930 146,356

Proved Developed and Undeveloped Reserves

   

Oil and Condensate

(MBbls)


   

Natural Gas

(MMcf)


   

MMcfe


 

December 31, 1999

  

359

 

  

185,198

 

  

187,352

 

Revisions of previous estimates

  

107

 

  

(1,893

)

  

(1,251

)

Extensions, discoveries and other additions

  

19

 

  

30,987

 

  

31,101

 

Production

  

(31

)

  

(11,645

)

  

(11,831

)

Purchase of reserves

  

11

 

  

35,879

 

  

35,945

 

Sale of reserves in place

  

(394

)

  

(64,279

)

  

(66,643

)

   

  

  

December 31, 2000

  

71

 

  

174,247

 

 ��

174,673

 

Revisions of previous estimates

  

(438

)

  

(5,697

)

  

(8,325

)

Extensions, discoveries and other additions

  

90

 

  

41,395

 

  

41,935

 

Production

  

(164

)

  

(13,130

)

  

(14,114

)

Purchase of reserves

  

4,361

 

  

33,402

 

  

59,568

 

Sale of reserves in place

  

—  

 

  

(964

)

  

(964

)

   

  

  

December 31, 2001

  

3,920

 

  

229,253

 

  

252,773

 

Revisions of previous estimates

  

—  

 

  

(3,339

)

  

(3,339

)

Extensions, discoveries and other additions

  

1,944

 

  

33,197

 

  

44,861

 

Production

  

(364

)

  

(18,715

)

  

(20,899

)

Purchase of reserves

  

29

 

  

1,071

 

  

1,245

 

Sale of reserves in place

  

(168

)

  

(212

)

  

(1,220

)

   

  

  

December 31, 2002

  

5,361

 

  

241,255

 

  

273,421

 

   

  

  

Proved Developed Reserves:

            

December 31, 2000

  

71

 

  

145,930

 

  

146,356

 

   

  

  

December 31, 2001

  

2,212

 

  

183,134

 

  

196,406

 

   

  

  

December 31, 2002

  

2,943

 

  

198,733

 

  

216,391

 

   

  

  

The following table sets forth the standardized measure of the discounted future net cash flows attributable to the Company'sour proved oil and gas reserves. Future cash inflows were computed by applying year-end prices of oil and gas to the estimated future production of proved oil and gas reserves. Natural gas prices were escalated only where existing contracts contained fixed and determinable escalation clauses. Contractually provided natural gas prices in excess of estimated market clearing prices were used in computing the future cash inflows only if the Company expectswe expect to continue to receive higher prices under legally enforceable contract terms. Future prices actually received may materially differ from current prices or the prices used in the standardized measure.

Future production and development costs represent the estimated future expenditures (based on current costs) to be incurred in developing and producing the proved reserves, assuming continuation of existing economic conditions. Future income tax expenses were computed by applying statutory income tax rates to the difference between pre-tax net cash flows relating to the Company'sour proved oil and gas reserves and the tax basis of proved oil and gas properties. In addition, the effects of statutory depletion in excess of tax basis,

Page 71


available net operating loss carryforwards and alternative minimum tax credits were used in computing future income tax expense. The resulting annual net cash inflows were then discounted using a 10 percent annual rate. December 31, 2000 1999 1998 (in thousands) Future cash inflows $1,727,923 $505,685 $354,567 Future production costs 205,385 151,220 123,007 Future development costs 19,981 30,431 26,128 Future net cash flows before income tax 1,502,557 324,034 205,432 Future income tax expense 422,485 58,068 28,031 Future net cash flows 1,080,072 265,966 177,401 10% annual discount for estimated timing of cash flows 612,679 146,703 101,737 Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows $467,393 $119,263 $75,664

   

Year Ended December 31,


   

2002


  

2001


  

2000


   

(in thousands)

Future cash inflows

  

$

1,372,935

  

$

722,203

  

$

1,727,923

Future production costs

  

 

263,705

  

 

178,533

  

 

205,385

Future development costs

  

 

51,151

  

 

39,145

  

 

19,981

   

  

  

Future net cash flows before income tax

  

 

1,058,079

  

 

504,525

  

 

1,502,557

Future income tax expense

  

 

285,633

  

 

127,277

  

 

422,485

   

  

  

Future net cash flows

  

 

772,446

  

 

377,248

  

 

1,080,072

10% annual discount for estimated timing of cash flows

  

 

417,523

  

 

188,305

  

 

612,679

   

  

  

Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows

  

$

354,923

  

$

188,943

  

$

467,393

   

  

  

Changes in Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows Year Ended December 31, 2000 1999 1998 (in thousands) Sales of oil and gas, net of production costs $(39,754) $(16,755) $(16,071) Net changes in prices and production costs 313,355 32,111 (57,646) Extensions, discoveries & other additions 123,223 4,090 4,906 Development costs incurred during the period 16,001 5,330 5,289 Revisions of previous quantity estimates (4,604) 1,709 (6,735) Purchase of minerals-in-place 121,979 20,438 2,896 Sale of minerals-in-place (41,456) - (26) Accretion of discount 13,628 8,116 14,059 Net change in income taxes (159,220) (11,526) 12,006 Other changes 4,978 86 (2,109) Net increase (decrease) 348,130 43,599 (43,431) Beginning of year 119,263 75,664 119,095 End of year $ 467,393 $ 119,263 75,664

   

Year Ended December 31,


 
   

2002


   

2001


   

2000


 
   

(in thousands)

Sales of oil and gas, net of production costs

  

$

(55,788

)

  

$

(47,191

)

  

$

(39,754

)

Net changes in prices and production costs

  

 

203,588

 

  

 

(483,009

)

  

 

313,355

 

Extensions, discoveries and other additions

  

 

82,808

 

  

 

37,907

 

  

 

123,223

 

Development costs incurred during the period

  

 

16,393

 

  

 

13,771

 

  

 

16,001

 

Revisions of previous quantity estimates

  

 

(6,513

)

  

 

(7,710

)

  

 

(4,604

)

Purchase of minerals-in-place

  

 

2,901

 

  

 

70,294

 

  

 

121,979

 

Sale of minerals-in-place

  

 

(328

)

  

 

(906

)

  

 

(41,456

)

Accretion of discount

  

 

24,254

 

  

 

64,363

 

  

 

13,628

 

Net change in income taxes

  

 

(72,614

)

  

 

122,636

 

  

 

(159,220

)

Other changes

  

 

(28,721

)

  

 

(48,605

)

  

 

4,978

 

   


  


  


Net increase (decrease)

  

 

165,980

 

  

 

(278,450

)

  

 

348,130

 

Beginning of year

  

 

188,943

 

  

 

467,393

 

  

 

119,263

 

   


  


  


End of year

  

$

354,923

 

  

$

188,943

 

  

$

467,393

 

   


  


  


As required by SFAS No. 69, "Disclosures“Disclosures about Oil and Gas Producing Activities," changes in standardized measure relating to sales of reserves are calculated using prices in effect as of the beginning of the period and changes in standardized measure relating to purchases of reserves are calculated using prices in effect at the end of the period. Accordingly, the changes in standardized measure for purchases and sales of reserves reflected above do not necessarily represent the economic reality of such transactions. See the disclosure of "Costs“Costs incurred in Certain Oil and Gas Activities"Activities” and the statements of cash flows in the financial statements. Natural gas prices have declined significantly since December 31, 2000; consequently, the discounted future net cash flows would be significantly reduced if the standardized measure was calculated in the first quarter of 2001.

Page 72


ITEM 9 - CHANGES–CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE None. PART III

Effective May 3, 2002, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of our Company dismissed Arthur Andersen LLP (“Andersen”) as the Company’s independent public accountants and engaged KPMG to serve as the Company’s independent public accountants for 2002.

None of Andersen’s reports on the Company’s consolidated financial statements for either of the past two fiscal years contained an adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion or were qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles.

During the Company’s two most recent fiscal years, there were no disagreements with Andersen on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of Andersen, would have caused Andersen to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreements in connection with Andersen’s report; and during such period there were no “reportable events” of the kind listed in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.

The Company disclosed the foregoing information on a Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 3, 2002 (the “Form 8-K”). The Company provided Andersen with a copy of the foregoing disclosure and requested Andersen to furnish the Company with a letter addressed to the Securities and Exchange Commission stating whether Andersen agreed with the statements by the Company in the foregoing disclosure and, if not, stating the respects in which it did not agree. Andersen’s letter stated that it had read the pertinent paragraphs of the Form 8-K and was in agreement with the statements contained therein. Andersen’s letter is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 16.1 of the Form 8-K.

During the Company’s two most recent fiscal years and through the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the Company did not consult KPMG with respect to the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company’s consolidated financial statements, or any other matters or reportable events listed in Items 304(a)(2)(i) and (ii) of Regulation S-K.

PARTIII

ITEMS 10, 11, 12 AND 13 - DIRECTORS–DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE COMPANY, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE COMPANY, EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION,SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS ANDCERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

Except for information concerning executive officers of the Company included as an unnumbered item in Part 1,I hereof, in accordance with General Instruction G(3), reference is hereby made to the Company'sCompany’s definitive proxy statement to be filed within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this report. PART IV

ITEM 14 - EXHIBITS,–CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures:

Within the 90 day period prior to the filing date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the Company, under the supervision, and with the participation, of its management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, performed an evaluation of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Securities and Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(c)). Based on that evaluation, the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that such disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management and made known to the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, particularly during the period for which this periodic report was being prepared.

(b) Changes in Internal Controls

No significant changes were made in the Company’s internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of the evaluation described in Item 14 (a).

Page 73


PART IV

ITEM 15 –EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K (a) Financial Statements 1. Financial Statements - The financial statements filed herewith are listed in the Index to Financial Statements on page 30 of this report. 2. All schedules are omitted because they are not required, inapplicable or the information is included in the consolidated financial statements or the notes thereto. 3. Exhibits (3.1)

(a)

Financial Statements

1.

Financial Statements – The financial statements filed herewith are listed in the Index to Financial Statements on page 36 of this report.

2.

All schedules are omitted because they are not required, inapplicable or the information is included in the consolidated financial statements or the notes thereto.

3.

Exhibits

(3.1

)

Articles of Incorporation of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999). (3.2) Articles of Amendment of Articles of Incorporation of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999). (3.3) Amended bylaws of the Company. (4) Rights Agreement dated as of February 11, 1998 between Penn Virginia Corporation and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed with Securities and Exchange Commission on February 20, 1998. (Commission File No. 0-753)). (10.1) Amended and restated Credit Agreement dated July 30, 1999, as amended by that certain First Amendment Agreement dated as of May 31, 2000, among Penn Virginia Corporation and Chase Manhattan Bank (formerly known as Chase Bank of Texas National Association), as Agent (the "Agent") and First Union National Bank, First National Bank of Chicago, PNC Bank National Association and Royal Bank of Canada (collectively, the "Banks"). (10.2) New Bank Agreement dated as of November 30, 2000 among Penn Virginia Corporation and the Banks. (10.3) Penn Virginia Corporation and Affiliated Companies Employees' Stock Ownership Plan, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 19 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1986 (Commission File No. 0-753)). (10.4) Penn Virginia Corporation and Affiliated Companies' Employees' Retirement/Savings Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 18(b) to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 13, 1991 (Registration No. 33-40430)). (10.5) The Company has adopted a policy concerning severance benefits for certain senior officers of the Company. The description of such policy is incorporated herein by reference to the description of such policy contained in the Company's definitive Proxy Statement dated March 27, 2001. (10.6) Penn Virginia Corporation 1994 Stock Option Plan, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999). (10.7) Penn Virginia Corporation 1995 Directors' Stock Option Plan, as amended. (10.8) Penn Virginia Corporation 1999 Employee Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999). (21) Subsidiaries of the Company. (23.1) Consent of Arthur Andersen LLP. (b) Reports on Form 8-K On January 12, 2001, Penn Virginia Corporation filed a report on Form 8-K. The report involved a divestiture on December 29, 2000 and was filed under "Item 2. Acquisition or Disoposition of Assets." EXHIBIT 3.3 AMENDED BYLAWS OF PENN VIRGINIA ARTICLE 1 SHAREHOLDERS Section 1. Meetings. A. Annual Meeting. Unless otherwise fixed by the board of directors the annual meeting of shareholders for the election of directors and for other business shall be held on the first Tuesday of May in each year or, if that day is a legal holiday, on the first subsequent business day. B. Special Meetings. Special meetings of the shareholders may be called at any time by the chief executive officer, or a majority of the board of directors. C. Place. Meetings of the shareholders shall be held at such place in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania or elsewhere, as may be fixed by the board of directors in the notice of meeting. D. Adjournments. A Public Announcement of an adjournment of an annual or special meeting shall not commence a new time period for the giving of shareholder notices provided herein. For purposes of these Bylaws, "Public Announcement" includes without limitation (i) a press release reported by the Dow Jones News, Associated Press or a comparable national news service, or (ii) a document filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. E. Organization. The Chairman of the Board of Directors, or, in the absence of the Chairman of the Board of Directors, such other officer or board member as the Board of Directors may designate, shall preside at each meeting of shareholders and may adjourn the meeting from time to time. The Secretary or an Assistant Secretary shall act as secretary of the meeting and keep a record of the proceedings thereof. The Board of Directors of the Company shall be entitled to make such rules or regulations for the conduct of meetings of shareholders as it shall deem necessary, appropriate or convenient. Subject to such rules and regulations of the Board of Directors, if any, the chairman of the meeting shall have the right and authority to prescribe such rules, regulations and procedures, and to do all such acts as, in the judgement of such chairman, are necessary, appropriate or convenient for the proper conduct of the meeting, including without limitation, establishing an agenda or order of business for the meeting, establishing rules and procedures for maintaining order at the meeting and the safety of those present, limiting the participation in such meeting to shareholders of record of the Company and their duly authorized and constituted proxies, and such other persons as the chairman shall permit, restricting entry to the meeting after the time fixed for the commencement thereof, limiting the time allotted to questions or comments by participants, and regulating the opening and closing of the polls for balloting on matters which are to be voted on by ballot. Unless, and to the extent, determined by the Board of Directors or the chairman of the meeting, meetings of shareholders shall not be required to be held in accordance with the rules of parliamentary procedure. Section 2. Notice. Written notice of the time and place of all meetings of shareholders and of the purpose of each special meeting of shareholders shall be given to each shareholder entitled to vote thereat at least ten days before the date of the meeting, unless a greater period of notice is required by law in a particular case. Section 3. Voting. A. Voting Rights. Except as otherwise provided herein, or in the Articles of Incorporation, or by law, every shareholder shall have the right at every shareholders' meeting to one vote for every share standing in his name on the books of the Company which is entitled to vote at such meeting. Every shareholder may vote either in person or by proxy. B. Election of Directors. At each annual meeting the shareholders shall elect at least seven but not more than ten directors who shall constitute the entire Board. C. Nomination of Directors. Nominations for the election of directors may be made by the Board of Directors or by any shareholder (a "Nominator") entitled to vote in the election of directors. Such nominations, other than those made by the Board of Directors, shall be made in writing pursuant to timely notice delivered to or mailed and received by the Secretary of the Company as set forth in this Section 3C. To be timely in connection with an annual meeting of shareholders, a Nominator's notice, setting forth the name and address of the person to be nominated, shall be delivered to or mailed and received at the principal executive offices of the Company not less than 90 days nor more than 180 days prior to the earlier of the date of the meeting or the corresponding date on which the immediately preceding year's annual meeting of shareholders was held; provided, however, that with respect to the annual meeting of shareholders to be held in 1998, notice by the shareholder to be timely must be delivered not later than the tenth day following the day on which Public Announcement of the date of such meeting is first made by the Company. To be timely in connection with any election of a director at a special meeting of the shareholders, a Nominator's notice, setting forth the name and address of the person to be nominated, shall be delivered to or mailed and received at the principal executive offices of the Company not later than the close of business on the tenth day following the day on which notice of the date of the meeting was mailed or Public Announcement of such meeting was made, whichever first occurs. At such time, the Nominator shall also submit written evidence, reasonably satisfactory to the Secretary of the Company, that the Nominator is a shareholder of the Company and shall identify in writing (i) the name and address of the Nominator, (ii) the number of shares of each class of capital stock of the Company of which the Nominator is the beneficial owner, (iii) the name and address of each of the persons, if any, with whom the Nominator is acting in concert and (iv) the number of shares of capital stock of which each such person with whom the Nominator is acting in concert is the beneficial owner pursuant to which the nomination or nominations are to be made. At such time, the Nominator shall also submit in writing (i) the information with respect to each such proposed nominee that would be required to be provided in a proxy statement prepared in accordance with Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) a notarized affidavit executed by each such proposed nominee to the effect that, if elected as a member of the Board of Directors, he will serve and that he is eligible for election as a member of the Board of Directors. Within 30 days (or such shorter time period that may exist prior to the date of the meeting) after the Nominator has submitted the aforesaid items to the Secretary of the Company, the Secretary of the Company shall determine whether the evidence of the Nominator's status as a shareholder submitted by the Nominator is reasonably satisfactory and shall notify the Nominator in writing of such determination. If the Secretary of the Company finds that such evidence is not reasonably satisfactory, or if the Nominator fails to submit the requisite information in the form or within the time indicated, such nomination shall be ineffective for the election at the meeting at which such person is proposed to be nominated. The presiding person at each meeting of shareholders shall, if the facts warrant, determine and declare at the meeting that a nomination was not made in accordance with the procedures prescribed by these Bylaws, and if he should so determine and so declare, the nomination shall be disregarded. The requirements of this Section 3C shall be in addition to any other requirements imposed by these Bylaws, by the Company's Articles of Incorporation or by law and in no event shall the periods specified herein be in derogation of other time periods required by law. Section 4. Quorom The presence, in person or by proxy, of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of stock of the Company entitled to vote at a meeting shall constitute a quorum. If a quorum is not present, no business shall be transacted except to adjourn to a future time. Section 5. Shareholder Proposals. No proposal by a shareholder may be voted upon at a meeting of shareholders unless the proposing shareholder shall have delivered or mailed in a timely manner (as set forth herein) and in writing to the Secretary of the Company (A) notice of such proposal, (B) the text of the proposed alteration, amendment or repeal, if such proposal relates to a proposed change to the Company's Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws, (C) evidence reasonably satisfactory to the Secretary of the Company of such shareholder's status as such and of the number of shares of each class of capital stock of the Company of which such shareholder is the beneficial owner, (D) a list of the names and addresses of other beneficial owners of shares of the capital stock of the Company, if any, with whom such shareholder is acting in concert, and the number of shares of each class of capital stock of the Company beneficially owned by each such beneficial owner and (E) an opinion of counsel, which counsel and the form and substance of which opinion shall be reasonably satisfactory to the Board of Directors of the Company, to the effect that the Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws resulting from the adoption of such proposal would not be in conflict with the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia if such proposal relates to a proposed change to the Company's Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws. To be timely in connection with an annual meeting of shareholders, a shareholder's notice and other aforesaid items shall be delivered to or mailed and received at the principal executive offices of the Company not less than 90 nor more than 180 days prior to the earlier of the date of the meeting or the corresponding date on which the immediately preceding year's annual meeting of shareholders was held; provided, however, that with respect to the annual meeting of shareholders to be held in 1998, notice by the shareholder to be timely must be delivered not later than the tenth day following the day on which Public Announcement of the date of such meeting is first made by the Company. To be timely in connection with the voting on any such proposal at a special meeting of the shareholders, a shareholder's notice and other aforesaid items shall be delivered to or mailed and received at the principal executive offices of the Company not later than the close of business on the tenth day following the day on which such notice of date of the meeting was mailed or Public Announcement was made whichever first occurs. Within 30 days (or such shorter period that may exist prior to the date of the meeting) after such shareholder shall have submitted the aforesaid items to the Secretary of the Company, the Secretary shall determine whether the items to be ruled upon by the Secretary are reasonably satisfactory and shall notify such shareholder in writing of such determination. If such shareholder fails to submit a required item in the form or within the time indicated, or if the Secretary determines that the items to be ruled upon by the Secretary are not reasonably satisfactory, then such proposal by such shareholder may not be voted upon by the shareholders of the Company at such meeting of shareholders. The presiding person at each meeting of shareholders shall, if the facts warrant, determine and declare at the meeting that a proposal was not made in accordance with the procedures prescribed by these Bylaws, and if he should so determine and so declare the proposal shall be disregarded. The requirements of this Section 5 shall be in addition to any other requirements imposed by these Bylaws, by the Company's Articles of Incorporation or by law and in no event shall the periods specified herein be in derogation of other time periods required by law. ARTICLE 2 DIRECTORS Section 1. Term of Office. Each director elected at an annual meeting of the shareholders shall hold office until the next annual meeting, unless properly removed or disqualified, and until such further time as his successor is elected and has qualified. Section 2. Powers. The business of the Company shall be managed by the board of directors which shall have all powers conferred by law and these bylaws. The board of directors shall elect, remove or suspend officers, determine their duties and compensations, and require security in such amounts as it may deem proper. Section 3. Meetings. A. Regular Meetings. Regular meetings shall be held at such times as the board shall designate by resolution. Notice of regular meetings need not be given. B. Special Meetings. Special meetings of the board may be called at any time by the chief executive officer and shall be called by him upon the written request of one-third of the directors. Written notice of the time, place and the general nature of the business to be transacted at each special meeting shall be given to each director at least three days before such meeting. C. Place. Meetings of the board of directors shall be held at such place as the board may designate or as may be designated in the notice calling the meeting. Section 4. Quorum. A majority of the number of directors in office immediately before the meeting begins shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at any meeting and, except as provided in Article VII, the acts of a majority of the directors present at any meeting at which a quorum is present shall be the acts of the board of directors. Section 5. Vacancies. Vacancies in the board of directors shall be filled by vote of a majority of the remaining members of the board though less than a quorum. Such election shall be for the balance of the unexpired term or until a successor is duly elected by the shareholders and has qualified. ARTICLE 3 BOARD COMMITTEES Section 1. Executive Committee. The board of directors by resolution of a majority of the number of directors then in office may designate three or more directors to constitute an executive committee, which, to the extent provided in such resolution, shall have and may exercise all the authority of the board of directors except to approve an amendment of the Company's articles of incorporation or a plan of merger or consolidation. If an executive committee is so designated it will elect one of its members to be its chairman. Section 2. Compensation and Benefits Committee. The board of directors by resolution of a majority of the number of directors then in office may designate three or more outside directors to constitute a compensation and benefits committee, which shall have such power and authority as may be provided in such resolution. Section 3. Other Committees. The board of directors by resolution of a majority of the number of directors then in office may create or disband other committees, as deemed to be proper. ARTICLE 4 OFFICERS Section 1. Election. At its first meeting after each annual meeting of the shareholders, the board of directors shall elect a president, treasurer and secretary, and such other officers as it deems advisable. Any two or more offices may be held by the same person except the offices of president and secretary. Section 2. Chairman and President. A. Chairman. The chairman shall preside at all meetings of the board and of the shareholders. If so designated by the board of directors, the chairman shall be the chief executive officer. B. President. The president shall be either the chief executive officer or the chief operating officer of the Company, as designated by the board of directors. The president shall have such duties as the board of directors and the chairman of the Company shall prescribe. Section 3. Other Officers. The duties of the other officers shall be those usually related to their offices, except as otherwise prescribed by resolution of the board of directors. Section 4. General. In the absence of the chairman and president, the person who has served longest as vice president or any other officer designated by the board shall exercise the powers and perform the duties of the chief executive officer or chief operating officer or both. The chief executive officer or any officer or employee authorized by him may appoint, remove or suspend agents or employees of the Company and may determine their duties and compensation. ARTICLE 5 INDEMNIFICATION Section 1. Right to Indemnification. Subject to Section 3, the Company shall indemnify any person who was or is a party or threatened to be a party to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, and whether formal or informal, and whether or not by or in the right of the corporation, by reason of the fact that he is or was a director or officer of the Company, or, while a director or officer of the Company, is or was serving at the request of the Company as a director, officer, partner, trustee, administrator, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan or other enterprise, for expenses (including attorney's fees), judgments, fines, penalties, including any excise tax assessed with respect to an employee benefit plan, and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by him in connection with such action, suit or proceeding, to the fullest extent and manner permitted by the Virginia Corporation Law as the same exists or may hereafter be amended (but, in the case of any such amendment, only to the extent that such amendment permits the Company to provide broader indemnification rights than permitted prior to such amendment). Section 2. Advance of Expenses. Subject to Section 3, expenses incurred by a director or officer of the Company in defending a civil or criminal action, suit or proceeding shall be paid by the Company in advance of the final disposition of such action, suit or proceeding upon receipt of an undertaking by or on behalf of the director or officer to repay such amount if it shall ultimately be determined that he is not entitled to be indemnified by the Company. Section 3. Procedure for Determining Permissibility. The procedure for determining the permissibility of indemnification pursuant to Article 5 (including the advance of expenses), shall be that set forth in Section 13.1-701.B of the Virginia Corporation Law, provided that, if there has been a change in control of the Company between the time of the action or failure to act giving rise to the claim for indemnification and such claim, then at the option of the person seeking indemnification, the permissibility of indemnification shall be determined by special legal counsel selected jointly by the Company and the person seeking indemnification. The reasonable expenses of any director or officer in prosecuting a successful claim for indemnification, and the fees and expenses of any special legal counsel engaged to determine permissibility of indemnification, shall be borne by the Company. Section 4. Contractual Obligation; Inuring of Benefit. The obligations of the Company to indemnify a person under this Article V, including the obligation to advance expenses, shall be considered contractual obligations of the Company to such person, subject only to the determination of permissibility as set forth in the preceding Section, and no modification or repeal of any provision of this Article V shall affect, to the detriment of such person, the obligations of the Company in connection with a claim based on any act or failure to act occurring before such modification or repeal. The obligations of the Company to indemnify a person under this Article V, including the obligation to advance expenses, shall inure to the benefit of the heirs, executors and administrators of such person. Section 5. Insurance and Other Indemnification. The board of directors of the Company shall have the power but shall not be obliged to (a) purchase and maintain, at the Company expense, insurance on behalf of the Company and its director, officers, employees and agents against liabilities asserted against any of them, including the Company's obligations to indemnify and advance expenses, to the extent that power to do so is not prohibited by applicable law, and (b) give other indemnification to the extent not prohibited by applicable law. ARTICLE 6 CERTIFICATES OF STOCK Section 1. Share Certificates. Every shareholder of record shall be entitled to a share certificate representing the shares held by him. Every share certificate shall bear the corporate seal and the signature of the president or a vice president and the secretary or an assistant secretary or treasurer of the Company. Section 2. Transfers. Shares of stock of the Company shall be transferable on the books of the Company only by the registered holder or by duly authorized attorney. A transfer shall be made only upon surrender of the share certificate. Any restrictions which are deemed to be imposed on the transfer of the Company's securities by the Shareholder Rights Agreement dated as of February 11, 1998 between the Company and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as it may be amended from time to time, or by any successor or replacement rights plan or agreement, are hereby authorized. ARTICLE 7 AMENDMENTS These bylaws may be changed at any regular or special meeting of the board of directors by the vote of a majority of the number of directors in office immediately before the meeting or at any annual or special meeting of shareholders by the vote of the shareholders entitled to vote as required by law. Notice of any such meeting of shareholders shall set forth the proposed change or a summary thereof. EXHIBIT 10.2 FIRST AMENDMENT AGREEMENT This First Amendment Agreement dated as of May 31, 2000 (this "Amendment") is among Penn Virginia Corporation, a Virginia corporation ("Borrower"), the Subsidiaries of the Borrower, the lenders listed on the signature pages hereto ("Banks"), and Chase Bank of Texas, National Association, a national banking association, as Agent. Reference is made to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of July 30, 1999 among the Borrower, the Banks and the Agent (the "Agreement"). In consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, the Borrower, the Banks and the Agent agree as set forth herein. 1. Amendments to the Agreement. 1.1 Definitions. (a) The definitions of Consolidated Tangible Net Worth and Total Commitment in Section 1.1 of the Agreement are hereby amended to read as follows: "Consolidated Tangible Net Worth" shall mean, with respect to the Borrower and its Restricted Subsidiaries, at any time, the Consolidated Equity of the Borrower, at such time, less the Borrower's Consolidated Intangible Assets with a value of greater than $1,000,000 at such time; provided that, the calculation of Consolidated Tangible Net Worth shall not give effect to any unrealized gain or loss recognized under GAAP after the date of the First Amendment Agreement attributable to Capital Stock owned by the Borrower, including but not limited to Norfolk Common Stock. For purposes of this definition, "Intangible Assets" shall mean the amount (to the extent reflected in determining Consolidated Equity) of all unamortized debt discount and expense, unamortized deferred charges, good will, patents, trademarks, service marks, trade names, copyrights and organization expenses. "Total Commitment" shall mean the amount listed as the "Total Commitment" on Schedule 1.1, as the same may be reduced from time to time pursuant to Section 2.9. (b) The following definitions are hereby added to Section 1.1 of the Agreement in the appropriate alphabetical order: "Capital Stock" means, with respect to any Person, any and all shares, interests, participations or other equivalents (however designated, whether voting or nonvoting) of capital stock, partnership interests (whether general or limited), company interests, membership interests or other ownership interests in or issued by such Person. "First Amendment" means the First Amendment Agreement dated as of May 31, 2000 among the Borrower, the Banks party thereto, and the Agent. 1.2 Section 3.5. Section 3.5 of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows: SECTION 3.5. Interim Total Borrowing Base. During the period from the date of the First Amendment through and including November 30, 2000, the Total Borrowing Base is $135,000,000 unless redetermined in accordance with Section 3.4. The determination of the Total Borrowing Base for Borrowing Base Periods starting after November 30, 2000 shall be governed by Article III. 1.3 Section 7.2(c). The Agreement is hereby amended by adding after Section 7.2(b) the following Section 7.2(c): (c) The Borrower and its Subsidiaries may purchase any Capital Stock of the Borrower if the aggregate of such purchases made from the date of the First Amendment is less than $500,000 and if, at the time such purchase is made, (i) no payment of principal, interest, fees or other amount required hereunder or under the Loan Documents has become due and has not been paid, (ii) no Default or Event of Default (other than as described in clause (i) of this proviso) has occurred, is continuing and has not been waived by the Majority Banks (or if required under Section 10.1, all of the Banks) has occurred or would occur as a result of the making of such purchase, (iii) no Borrowing Base Deficiency exists or is reasonably expected to exist as of the next Determination Date, and (iv) after giving effect to the proposed purchase, the Borrower is in compliance with covenants contained in Section 7.15 as of (and as if the most recently ended Fiscal Quarter of the Borrower had ended on) the date such purchase is made. 1.4 Section 8.1(c). Section 8.1(c) of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows: (c) The Borrower or any Subsidiary of the Borrower shall fail to perform or observe any term, covenant or agreement contained in Section 6.1(c), 6,1(d)(ii), 6.11 or Article VII, other than Section 7.15(a) or 7.15(b), of this Credit Agreement; or 1.5 Schedule 1.1. Schedule 1.1 of the Agreement is hereby replaced with the Schedule 1.1 attached to this Amendment. 2. Miscellaneous. 2.1 Amendments, Etc. No amendment or waiver of this Amendment or consent to any departure by the Borrower therefrom is effective unless completed in accordance with Section 10.1 of the Agreement. 2.2 Governing Law. This Amendment and the Agreement as amended hereby are governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas. 2.3 Preservation. Except as modified by this Amendment, all of the terms, provisions, covenants, warranties and agreements of the Agreement (including, without limitation, its exhibits and schedules thereto) or any of the other documents executed in connection with the Agreement remain in full force and effect. Unless otherwise defined herein, capitalized terms that are defined in the Agreement are used herein as therein defined. 2.4 Execution in Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts which are deemed to be an original and all of which taken together constitute one and the same agreement. 2.5 Bank Credit Decision. Each Bank acknowledges that it has, independently and without reliance upon the Agent or any other Bank and based on documents and information it deems appropriate, made its own credit analysis and decision to enter into this Amendment and to agree to the various matters set forth herein and will continue to make its own credit decisions in taking or not taking action under the Agreement as amended hereby. 2.6 Representations. The Borrower and each Subsidiary of the Borrower represent and warrant to the Agent and the Banks that: (i) The representations and warranties in Article V of the Agreement and, in all material respects, in each of the other Loan Documents to which the Borrower or such Subsidiary is a party, are true and correct on and as of the date hereof as though made on and as of the date hereof, and (ii) No event or state of affairs which could reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect has occurred since the fiscal year end of the Fiscal Year for which audited financial statements conforming to the requirements of Section 6.1(b) of the Agreement have been delivered to the Banks pursuant to Section 6.1(b). (iii) No event has occurred and is continuing which constitutes a Default or an Event of Default. (iv) No new material litigation (other than Existing Litigation) is pending or, to the best knowledge of the Borrower after due inquiry, threatened against the Borrower or any Subsidiary and no material adverse development has occurred in any Existing Litigation. 2.7 Authority, etc. The Borrower represents and warrants to the Agent and the Banks that (i) the Borrower and each of its Subsidiaries is an entity duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the jurisdiction of its formation, (ii) the execution, delivery and performance of this Amendment by the Borrower and its Subsidiaries are within the power and authority of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries and have been duly authorized by all necessary action and the performance of the Agreement, as amended hereby, by the Borrower is within the power and authority of the Borrower and has been duly authorized by all necessary action, (iii) the execution, delivery and performance of the Amendment by the Borrower and its Subsidiaries and the performance of the Agreement, as amended hereby, by the Borrower do not contravene (A) the Borrower's or any of its Subsidiaries' certificate of incorporation or bylaws or similar formation or organizational documents, (B) any order, writ, injunction or decree, or (C) law or any agreement binding on or affecting the Borrower or any Subsidiary of the Borrower, and will not result in or require the creation or imposition of any Lien prohibited by the Agreement, (iv) this Amendment has been duly executed and delivered by the Borrower and its Subsidiaries, (v) this Amendment and the Agreement, as amended hereby, are legal, valid and binding obligations of the Borrower enforceable against the Borrower in accordance with its terms and this Amendment is the legal, valid and binding obligation of each Subsidiary, enforceable against each Subsidiary in accordance with its terms, except, in each case, as such enforceability may be limited by any applicable bankruptcy, reorganization, insolvency, moratorium or similar law affecting creditors' rights generally, and (v) no authorization, consent, license or approval of, or other action by, and no notice to or filing with, any governmental authority, regulatory body or other Person is required for the due execution, delivery and performance of this Amendment or the performance of the Agreement, as amended hereby. 2.8 Default. Without limiting any other event which may constitute an Event of Default, in the event any representation or warranty set forth herein shall be incorrect or misleading in any material respect when made, such event shall constitute an "Event of Default" under the Agreement, as amended hereby. 2.9 Effectiveness. This Amendment will become effective as of May 31, 2000 subject to the following conditions precedent: (a) The Agent shall have received, duly authorized, executed and delivered by each Person that is shown to be a party thereto, in form and substance satisfactory to the Banks, each of the following: (i) this Amendment and a Note payable to the order of Royal Bank of Canada in the amount of $30,000,000 and substantially in the form of Exhibit D to the Agreement; (ii) a certificate of the Secretary or Assistant Secretary of the Borrower, dated the date of this Amendment, certifying (x) that attached thereto are copies of the documents generally described in (y) below which were delivered in connection with the Agreement and that such documents are in full force and effect, are true and correct, and are the only such documents relating to the subject matter set forth therein, or (y) as to (aa) the adoption and continuing effect of resolutions of the board of directors of the Borrower authorizing the transactions contemplated hereby and by the Agreement; (bb) no amendments, modifications, changes or alterations to, or revocation, repeal or supersession of (A) the Articles of Incorporation of the Borrower and (B) the Bylaws of the Borrower, and (cc) the incumbency of all officers of the Borrower who will execute or have executed any document or instrument required to be delivered hereunder, containing the signature of same; (iii) a certificate of the Secretary or Assistant Secretary of each Subsidiary Guarantor, dated the date of this Amendment and certifying (x) that attached thereto are copies of the documents described in (y) below which were delivered in connection with the Agreement and that such documents are in full force and effect, are true and correct, and are the only such documents relating to the subject matter set forth therein, or (y) as to (aa) the adoption and continuing effect of resolutions of the board of directors of such Subsidiary Guarantor authorizing the transactions contemplated hereby and by the Agreement; (bb) no amendments, modifications, changes or alterations to, or revocation, repeal or supersession of (A) the Articles (or Certificate, as the case may be) of Incorporation of such Subsidiary Guarantor and (B) the Bylaws of such Subsidiary Guarantor and (cc) the incumbency of all officers of such Subsidiary Guarantor who will execute or have executed any document or instrument required to be delivered hereunder, containing the signature of same; (iv) with respect to the Borrower, a certificate of existence and good standing from the Secretary of State of the State of Virginia dated no more than 5 days prior to the date of this Amendment; (v) an opinion of the Borrower's Counsel in form and substance satisfactory to the Majority Banks; (vi) such information regarding the Borrowing Base Assets as the Agent or any Bank may reasonably request; (vii) such financial information, regarding the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries as the Agent or any Bank may reasonably request. All of such financial statements and financial information shall be satisfactory to the Banks; (viii) for its account and for the account of each Bank, as applicable, all fees and expenses due and payable on or before the Effective Date and invoiced to the Borrower in writing prior to the Effective Date; (ix) a Federal Reserve Form U-1, as the case may be, with respect to the Commitment of Royal Bank of Canada; and (x) such other certificates, opinions, documents and instruments relating to the transactions contemplated hereby as may have been reasonably requested by the Agent or any Bank. (b) payment of all fees and expenses due and payable under the Agreement or any other agreements executed in connection therewith. (c) Such other conditions precedent which the Agent may reasonably have requested or required. 2.10 Consent. Each of the Subsidiaries hereby (a) consents to and agrees to the terms of this Amendment, (b) agrees that (i) none of its obligations and none of the Banks' or the Agent's rights and remedies with respect to the undersigned is released, impaired or affected thereby, (ii) no guaranty agreement provided by the undersigned is released, impaired or affected thereby or by the foregoing, and (iii) this consent shall not be construed as requiring the consent or agreement of the undersigned in any circumstance, (c) ratifies and confirms all provisions of all Loan Documents executed by the undersigned and all documents pertaining thereto or referred to therein, and (d) agrees that none of its obligations, none of the Banks' or the Agent's rights and remedies and no guaranty agreement would be released, impaired or affected if the undersigned had not executed this consent. 2.11 FINAL AGREEMENT OF THE PARTIES. THIS AMENDMENT (INCLUDING THE SCHEDULE HERETO), THE AGREEMENT, THE NOTES AND THE OTHER LOAN DOCUMENTS TO WHICH THE BORROWER OR ANY OF ITS SUBSIDIARIES AS A PARTY CONSTITUTE A "LOAN AGREEMENT" AS DEFINED IN SECTION 26.02(A) OF THE TEXAS BUSINESS AND COMMERCE CODE, AND REPRESENT THE FINAL AGREEMENT OF THE PARTIES AND MAY NOT BE CONTRADICTED BY EVIDENCE OF PRIOR, CONTEMPORANEOUS OR SUBSEQUENT ORAL AGREEMENTS OF THE PARTIES. THERE ARE NO ORAL AGREEMENTS BETWEEN THE PARTIES. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be executed by their respective officers thereunto duly authorized, as of the date first above written. CHASE BANK OF TEXAS, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as a Bank and as Agent By:_________________________________________ Name: Title: FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK, as a Bank and as Syndication Agent By:_________________________________________ Name: Title: THE FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF CHICAGO, as a Bank and as Documentation Agent By:_________________________________________ Name: Title: PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION By:_________________________________________ Name: Title: BORROWER: PENN VIRGINIA CORPORATION By:________________________________________ Name:______________________________________ Title:______________________________________ SUBSIDIARIES: PENN VIRGINIA COAL COMPANY By:________________________________________ Name: Title: PENN VIRGINIA HOLDING CORP. By:________________________________________ Name: Title: PENN VIRGINIA OIL & GAS CORPORATION By: ________________________________________ Name: Title: PENN VIRGINIA EQUITIES CORPORATION By: ________________________________________ Name: Title: SCHEDULE 1.1 Bank Name and Address Amount of Commitment Chase Bank of Texas, National Association $30,000,000 600 Travis St., CTH-20-86 Houston, Texas 77002 Attention: Robert C. Mertensotto Vice President Telephone No.: (713) 216-4147 Telecopy No.: (713) 216-4117 First Union National Bank $ 30,000,000 c/o First Union Corporation 1001 Fannin Street, Suite 2255 Houston, Texas 77002 Attention: Russell Clingman Telephone No.: (713) 346-2716 Telecoy No.: (713) 650-6354 Bank One/First Chicago Capital Markets, Inc. $ 30,000,000 One First National Plaza, MS 0362 Chicago, Illinois 60670-0362 Attention: Jim Gummell Telephone No.: (312) 732-5785 Telecopy No.: (312) 732-3055 PNC Bank, N.A. $ 30,000,000 One PNC Plaza 249 Fifth Avenue Mail Stop PI-POPP-03-3 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15222 Attention: Andy Mitrey Telephone No.: (412) 762-9064 Telecopy No.: (412) 762-2571 ___________________ $ 30,000,000 Address: ___________________ ___________________________ Attention:___________________ Telephone No.: ______________ Telecopy No.:_______________ Total Commitment $150,000,000 EXHIBIT 10.7 PENN VIRGINIA CORPORATION Amended and Restated 1995 Directors' Stock Option Plan 1. Purpose. The purposes of the Plan are to attract and retain the services of experienced and knowledgeable directors and to encourage eligible directors of Penn Virginia Corporation to acquire a proprietary and vested interest in the growth and performance of the Company, thus enhancing the value of the Company for the benefit of its shareholders. 2. Definitions. As used in the Plan, the following terms shall have the meanings set forth below: (a) "Board" means the Board of Directors of the Company. (b) "Code" means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. (c) "Common Stock" means the common stock, par value $6.25 per share, of the Company. (d) "Company" means Penn Virginia Corporation. (e) "Eligible Director" means each director of the Company. (f) "Exchange Act" means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. (g) "Fair Market Value" means with respect to the Common Stock on any given date the closing stock market price for a Share (as reported by the New York Stock Exchange, any other exchange on which the Shares are listed or any other recognized stock quotation service), or in the event that there shall be no closing stock price on such date, the closing stock price on the date nearest preceding such date. (h) "Grant Date" means the date on which an Option or Share is granted. (i) "Option" means any right granted to an Optionee allowing such Optionee to purchase Shares at such price or prices and during such period or periods as are set forth in the Plan. All Options shall be non-qualified options. (j) "Option Agreement" means a written instrument evidencing an Option granted hereunder and signed by an authorized representative of the Company and the Optionee. (k) "Optionee" means an Eligible Director who receives an Option under the Plan. (l) "Shares" means shares of Common Stock. 3. Administration. Subject to the terms of the Plan, the Board shall have the power to interpret the provisions and supervise the administration of the Plan. 4. Shares Subject to the Plan. (a) Total Number. Subject to adjustment as provided in this Section, the total number of Shares which may be granted or as to which Options may be granted under the Plan shall be 200,000 Shares. Any Shares issued pursuant to a grant of Shares or pursuant to Options granted hereunder may consist, in whole or in part, of authorized and unissued Shares or treasury Shares. (b) Reduction in Number of Shares Available. (i) The grant of an Option shall reduce the number of Shares which may be granted or as to which Options may be granted by the number of Shares subject to such Option. (ii) Any Shares issued by the Company through the assumption or substitution of outstanding grants of an acquired company shall not reduce the Shares available for grants under the Plan. (c) Increase in Number of Shares Available. The lapse, expiration, cancellation, or other termination of an Option that has not been fully exercised shall increase the number of Shares as to which Options may be granted by the number of Shares that have not been issued upon exercise of such Option. (d) Other Adjustments. The total number and kind of Shares available under the Plan, the number and kind of Shares subject to outstanding Options, and the exercise price for such Options shall be appropriately adjusted by the Board for: (i) any increase or decrease in the number of outstanding Shares resulting from a stock dividend, subdivision, combination of Shares, reclassification, or other change in corporate structure or capitalization affecting the Shares. (ii) any conversion of the Shares into or exchange of the Shares for other shares as a result of any merger or consolidation (including a sale of assets), or (iii) any other event such that an adjustment is made reasonably necessary to maintain the proportionate interest of the Optionee. 5. Grant of Shares and Options. On February 8, 1995, or, with respect to any person who was not an Eligible Director on such date, on the date such person becomes an Eligible Director, each Eligible Director shall be granted an Option to acquire 10,000 Shares. Thereafter, on the first business day of each year from 1996 through 2002, inclusive, each Eligible Director on such date shall be granted an Option to acquire an additional 200 Shares. In addition, except as otherwise agreed, effective on and after October 25, 2000 through the termination of the Plan each Eligible Director shall receive 1,000 Shares issuable on the date of the Company's annual meeting; $2,500 payable quarterly, at the Eligible Director's option, either in cash or Shares; and $1,000 in meeting fees ($1,250 for the committee chairman) for each Board and committee meeting attended by the Eligible Director which shall be paid, at the Eligible Director's option, in cash or Shares. 6. General Terms Regarding Option Grants. The following provisions shall apply to each Option: (a) Option Price. The purchase price per Share purchasable under an Option shall be 100% of the Fair Market Value of a Share on the Grant Date. (b) Option Period. Each Option granted shall expire 10 years from its Grant Date, and shall be subject to earlier termination as hereinafter provided. (c) Service Period. Each Option granted under the Plan shall become exercisable by the Optionee only after the completion of one year of Board service immediately following the Grant Date. Exercise of any or all previously granted Options shall not be required. (d) Transfer and Exercise. No Option shall be transferable by the Optionee except by will or the laws of descent and distribution. In the event of the death of an Optionee, the Option, if otherwise exercisable by the Optionee at the time of such death, may be exercised within six months after such Optionee's death by the person to whom such right has passed by will or the laws of descent and distribution. (e) Method of Exercise. Any Option may be exercised, after the completion of one year of Board service following the Grant Date, by the Optionee in whole or in part at such time or times and by such methods as the Board may specify, including by Cashless Exercise (as defined in Section 9(f)). The applicable Option Agreement may provide that the Optionee may make payment of the Option price in cash, Shares, or such other consideration as the Board may specify, or any combination thereof, having a Fair Market Value on the exercise date equal to the total Option price. (f) Issuance of Certificates; Payment of Cash. Only whole Shares shall be issuable upon exercise of Options. Any right to a fractional Share shall be satisfied in cash. Upon payment to the Company of the Option price, the Company shall deliver to the Optionee a certificate for the number of whole Shares and a check for the Fair Market Value on the date of exercise of the fractional share to which the Optionee is entitled. 7. Change in Control. (a) Effect of Change in Control. Notwithstanding anything in the Plan to the contrary, other than the initial shareholder approval requirement set forth in Section 10, and subject to any applicable pooling-of-interest accounting rules, in the event of a Change in Control of the Company, the Options granted under Section 5 shall vest and become immediately exercisable; provided, however, that at least six months shall elapse from the Grant Date of an Option to the date of disposition of any Shares issued upon exercise of such Option. In the event of a Change in Control of the Company as defined in Section 7(b)(iii), the Company may provide in any agreement with respect to such merger or consolidation that the surviving corporation shall grant options to the Optionees to acquire shares in such corporation with respect to which the excess of the fair market value of the share of such corporation immediately after the consummation of such merger or consolidation over the option price shall not be less than the excess of the Fair Market Value of the Shares over the Option price of Options, immediately prior to the consummation of such merger or consolidation. (b) Definition. For purposes of the Plan, a "Change in Control of the Company" shall be deemed to have occurred if: (i) any "person" (as such term is used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the Exchange Act), other than a trustee of other fiduciary holding securities under an employee benefit plan of the Company or any company owned, directly or indirectly, by the shareholders of the Company in substantially the same proportions as their ownership of stock of the Company, becomes, after the effective date of the Plan, the "beneficial owner" (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company representing 25% or more of the combined voting power of the Company's then outstanding securities; (ii) during any period of two consecutive years (not including any period prior to the effective date of the Plan), individuals who at the beginning of such period constitute the Board and any new director (other than a director designated by a person who has entered into an agreement with the Company to effect a transaction described in any of clauses (i), (iii) and (iv) of this Section 7(b)) whose election by the Board or whose nomination for election by the Company's shareholders was approved by a vote of at least two-thirds (2/3) of the directors then still in office who either were directors at the beginning of the period or whose election or nomination for election was previously so approved, cease for any reason (other than retirement) to constitute at least a majority thereof; (iii) the shareholders of the Company approve a merger or consolidation of the Company with any other corporation, other than a merger or consolidation that would result in the voting securities of the Company outstanding immediately prior thereto continuing to represent (either by remaining outstanding or by being converted into voting securities of the surviving entity) at least 75% of the combined voting power of the voting securities of the Company or such surviving entity outstanding immediately after such merger or consolidation; or (iv) the shareholders of the Company approve a plan of complete liquidation of the Company or an agreement for the sale or disposition by the Company of all or substantially all of the Company's assets. 8. Amendments and Termination. (a) Board Authority. The Board may amend, alter, or terminate the Plan, but no amendment, alteration, or termination shall be made (i) that would impair or adversely affect the rights of an Optionee under an Option theretofore granted, without the Optionee's consent, or (ii) without the approval of the shareholders if such approval is necessary to comply with any tax or regulatory requirement, including for these purposes any approval requirement that is a prerequisite for exemptive relief from Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act, or if the proposed alteration or amendment would increase the aggregate number of Shares that may be issued pursuant to the Plan (other than pursuant to Section 4 (d) hereof); provided, however that no provision of the Plan that (i) permits Eligible Directors to receive Options, (ii) states the amount or price of Options to be granted to Eligible Directors, (iii) specifies the timing of grants of Options to Eligible Directors, or (iv) sets forth a formula that determines the amount, price or timing of grants of Options to Eligible Directors, shall be amended more frequently than once every six months, other than to comport with changes in the Code, the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, or the rules thereunder. (b) Prior Shareholder and Optionee Approval. Anything herein to the contrary notwithstanding, in the event that amendments to the Plan are required in order that the Plan or any other stock- based compensation plan of the Company comply with the requirements of Rule 16b-3 issued under the Exchange Act, as amended from time to time, or any successor rule promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission related to the treatment of benefit and compensation plans under Section 16 of the Exchange Act, the Board is authorized to make such amendments without the consent of Optionees or the shareholders of the Company. 9. General Provisions. (a) Compliance with Regulations. All certificates for Shares issued and delivered under the Plan pursuant to a grant of Shares or pursuant to the exercise of any Option shall be subject to such stock transfer orders and other restrictions as the Board may deem advisable under the rules, regulations, and other requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission, any stock exchange upon which the Shares are then listed, and any applicable federal or state securities law, and the Board may cause a legend or legends to be put on any such certificates to make appropriate reference to such restrictions. The Company shall not be required to issue or deliver any Shares under the Plan prior to the completion of any registration or qualification of such Shares under any federal or state law, or under any ruling or regulation of any governmental body or national securities exchange, that the Board in its sole discretion shall deem to be necessary or appropriate. (b) Other Plans. Nothing contained in the Plan shall prevent the Board from adopting other or additional compensation arrangements, subject to shareholder approval if such approval is required by applicable law or the rules of any stock exchange on which the Common Stock is then listed; and such arrangements may be either generally applicable or applicable only in specific cases. (c) Withholding of Taxes. Each Optionee shall pay to the Company, upon the Company's request, all amounts necessary to satisfy the Company's federal, state and local tax withholding obligations, if any, with respect to the grant or exercise of any Option. (d) Conformity With Law. If any provision of the Plan is or becomes or is deemed invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any jurisdiction, or would disqualify the Plan or any Option under any law deemed applicable by the Board, such provision shall be construed or deemed amended in such jurisdiction to conform to applicable laws or if it cannot be construed or deemed amended without, in the determination of the Board, materially altering the intent of the Plan, it shall be stricken and the remainder of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect. (e) Insufficient Shares. In the event there are insufficient Shares remaining to satisfy all of the Share or Option grants under Section 5 made on the same day, such grants shall be reduced pro-rata. (f) An Optionee may exercise and pay for Shares purchased upon the exercise of an Option through the use of a brokerage firm to make payment to the Company of the option price and any taxes required by law to be withheld upon exercise of the Option either from the proceeds of a loan to the Optionee from the brokerage firm or from the proceeds of the sale of Shares issued pursuant to the exercise of the Option, and upon receipt of such payment the Company shall deliver the shares issuable under the Option exercised to such brokerage firm (a "Cashless Exercise"). Notwithstanding anything stated to the contrary in the Plan, the date of exercise of a Cashless Exercise shall be the date on which the broker executes the sale of exercised Shares or, if no sale is made, the date the broker receives the exercise loan notice from the Optionee to pay the Company for the exercised Shares. 10. Effective Date and Termination. The Plan shall become effective upon approval by the Company's shareholders and, with respect to new grants, shall terminate on the second business day of 2002. With respect to outstanding Options, the Plan shall terminate on the date on which all outstanding Options have expired or terminated. The Board shall submit the Plan to the shareholders of the Company for their approval at the 1995 annual meeting of shareholders unless such shareholders' approval shall have been obtained prior to such meeting. Any Option granted before the approval of the Plan by the shareholders of the Company shall be expressly conditioned upon, and any Option shall not be exercisable until, such approval on or prior to the date of the 1995 annual meeting of such shareholders. If such shareholder approval is not received at or before the 1995 annual meeting, the Board shall have the right to terminate the Plan, in which case all Options granted under the Plan shall expire. EXHIBIT 21 PENN VIRGINIA CORPORATION SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT NAME PERCENTAGES STATE Penn Virginia Holding Corp. 100% DelawareCorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999).

(3.2

)

Articles of Amendment of Articles of Incorporation of Penn Virginia Coal Company 100% VirginiaCorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999).

(3.3

)

Amended bylaws of Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Registrant’s Report on Form 8-K filed on March 28, 2002).

(4.1

)

Rights Agreement dated as of February 11, 1998 between Penn Virginia Equities Corporation 100% Delawareand American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed on February 20, 1998).

(4.2

)

Amendment No. 1 to Rights Agreement dated March 27, 2002 by and between Penn Virginia OilCorporation and American Stock Transfer & Gas Corporation 100% VirginiaTrust Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Registrant’s Report on Form 8-K filed on March 28, 2002).

(10.1

)

Credit Agreement dated as of October 30, 2001 among Penn Virginia EnergyCorporation, the lenders party thereto, First Union National Bank, Bank One, NA, and Royal Bank of Canada, as Co-Syndication Agents, and The Chase Manhattan Bank, as Administrative Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001).

(10.2

)

Penn Virginia Corporation and Affiliated Companies Employees’ Stock Ownership Plan, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001).

(10.3

)

Penn Virginia Corporation and Affiliated Companies’ Employees’ 401(k) Plan, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001).

(10.6

)

Penn Virginia Corporation 1995 Third Amended and Restated Directors’ Stock Compensation Plan.

(10.7

)

Penn Virginia Corporation Amended 1999 Employee Stock Incentive Plan.

(10.8

)

Omnibus Agreement (“Omnibus Agreement”) dated October 30, 2001 among Penn Virginia Corporation, Penn Virginia Resource GP, LLC, Penn Virginia Operating Co. 100%, LLC and Penn Virginia Concord Land Company 100% Delaware Kanawha Rail Corp. 100%Resource Partners, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Registrant’s Report on Form 8-K filed on November 14, 2001).

(10.9

)

Amendment No.1 to Omnibus Agreement

(10.10

)

Penn Virginia Paragon Coal Corporation 100%1994 Stock Option Plan, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999).

(10.11

)

Change of Control Severance Agreement dated May 7, 2002 between Penn Virginia Savannah Land Company 100% Delaware Corporation and A. James Dearlove (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Registrant’s Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2002).

(10.12

)

Change of Control Severance Agreement dated May 7, 2002 between Penn Virginia Corporation and Frank A. Pici (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Registrant’s Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2002).

(10.13

)

Change of Control Severance Agreement dated May 7, 2002 between Penn Virginia Corporation and Nancy M. Snyder (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of Registrant’s Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2002).

(10.14

)

Change of Control Severance Agreement dated May 7, 2002 between Penn Virginia Corporation and H. Baird Whitehead (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of Registrant’s Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2002).

(10.15

)

Change of Control Severance Agreement dated May 7, 2002 between Penn Virginia Corporation and Keith D. Horton (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of Registrant’s Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2002).

(21

)

Subsidiaries of Registrant.

(23.1

)

Consent of KPMG LLP.

(99.1

)

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

(99.2

)

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

EXHIBIT 23.1 As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our report dated February 9, 2001, included in the Annual Report of Penn Virginia Corporation on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000, into Penn Virginia Corporation's previously filed Registration Statements Nos. 33- 49438, 33-96465, 33-59651 and 33-96463 on Form S-8. ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP Houston, Texas February 21, 2001

Page 74


(b)

Reports on Form 8-K

On October 30, 2002, Registrant filed a report on Form 8-K. The report involved the resignation of a director of Registrant’s Board of Directors.

On December 6, 2002, Registrant filed a report on Form 8-K. The report involved the election of a director to Registrant’s Board of Directors.

Page 75