Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM10-K

ýANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016

Or
¨TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
2019

or

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period fromto

Commission file number 001-13619

BROWN & BROWN, INC.

(Exact name of Registrantregistrant as specified in its charter)

Florida

59-0864469

Florida
59-0864469

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification Number)

220 South Ridgewood Avenue,

Daytona Beach, FL

32114

(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (386) 252-9601

Registrant’s Website: www.bbinsurance.com

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class

Trading Symbol(s)

Name of each exchange on which registered

COMMON STOCK, $0.10 PAR VALUE

NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE

BRO

New york stock exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  ý    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.    Yes  ¨    No  ý

NOTE:

Note - Checking the box above will not relieve any registrant required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act from their obligations under those Sections.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  ý    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files)...    Yes  ý    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company or emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:

Large accelerated filer

ý

Accelerated filer

¨

Non-accelerated filer

¨  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company

¨

Emerging growth company

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.):Act).  Yes  ¨    No  ý

The aggregate market value of the voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant, computed by reference to the price at which the stock was last sold on June 30, 20162019 (the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter) was $4,352,838,341.

$7,853,765,460.

The number of shares of the Registrant’s common stock, $0.10 par value, outstanding as of February 23, 201720, 2020 was 139,986,178.

281,552,678.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of Brown & Brown, Inc.’s Proxy Statement for the 20172020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Report.




Table of Contents

BROWN & BROWN, INC.

ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDEDDECEMBER 31, 2016

2019

INDEX

PAGE

NO.

Part I

5

Item 1.

Item 1A.1.

5

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

11

Item 1B.

20

Item 2.

20

Item 3.

20

Item 4.

21

22

Item 5.

22

Item 6.

24

Item 7.

25

Item 7A.

42

Item 8.

44

Item 9.

84

Item 9A.

84

Item 9B.

84

85

Item 10.

85

Item 11.

86

Item 12.

86

Item 13.

87

Item 14.

87

88

Item 15.

88

Item 16.

89

Exhibit Index

90


2


Table of Contents

Disclosure Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

Brown & Brown, Inc., together with its subsidiaries (collectively, “we,” “Brown & Brown” or the “Company”), makes “forward-looking statements” within the “safe harbor” provision of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as amended, throughout this report and in the documents we incorporate by reference into this report. You can identify these statements by forward-looking words such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “intend,” “estimate,” “plan” and “continue” or similar words. We have based these statements on our current expectations about potential future events. Although we believe the expectations expressed in the forward-looking statements included in this Form 10-K and the reports, statements, information and announcements incorporated by reference into this report are based upon reasonable assumptions within the bounds of our knowledge of our business, a number of factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements, whether oral or written, made by us or on our behalf. Many of these factors have previously been identified in filings or statements made by us or on our behalf. Important factors which could cause our actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements in this report include but are not limited to the following items, in addition to those matters described in Part I, Item 1A “Risk Factors” and Part II, Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”:

The inability to retain or hire qualified employees, as well as the loss of any of our executive officers or other key employees;

Acquisition-related risks that could negatively affect the success of our growth strategy, including the possibility that we may not be able successfully identify suitable acquisition candidates, complete acquisitions, integrate acquired businesses into our operations, and expand into new markets continuing;

Future prospects;

A cybersecurity attack or any other interruption in information technology and/or data security and/or outsourcing relationships;

Material adverse changes in economic conditions in the markets we serve and in the general economy;

The requirement for additional resources and time to adequately respond to dynamics resulting from rapid technological change;

Premium rates set by insurance companies and insurable exposure units, which have traditionally varied and are difficult to predict;

Changes in data privacy and protection laws and regulations or any failure to comply with such laws and regulations;

Future regulatory actions and conditions in the states in which we conduct our business;

The loss of any of our insurance company relationships, which could result in additional expense and loss of market share;

The occurrence

Adverse economic conditions, natural disasters, or regulatory changes in states where we have a high concentration of our business;

The inability to maintain our culture or a change in management, management philosophy or our business strategy;

Risks facing us in our Services Segment, including our third-party claims administration operations, that are distinct from those we face in our insurance intermediary operations;

Our failure to comply with any covenants contained in our debt agreements;

The possibility that covenants in our debt agreements could prevent use from engaging in certain potentially beneficial activities;

Changes in estimates, judgments or assumptions used in the preparation of our financial statements;

Improper disclosure of confidential information;

The limitations of our system of disclosure and internal controls and procedures in preventing errors or fraud, or in informing management of all material information in a timely manner;

The potential adverse effect of certain actual or potential claims, regulatory actions or proceedings on our businesses, results of operations, financial condition or liquidity;

Changes in the U.S.-based credit markets that might adversely affect our results of operation and financial condition;

The significant control certain existing shareholders have over the Company;

Risk related to our international operations, which may require more time and expense than our domestic options to achieve or maintain profitability;

Risks associated with the current interest rate environment and to the extent we use debt to finance our investments, changes in interest rates will affect our cost of capital and net investment income;

3


Table of adverse economic conditions, an adverse regulatory climate, or a disaster in Arizona, California, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Michigan, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Texas, Virginia and Washington, because a significant portion of business written by us is for customers located in these states;Contents

Disintermediation within the insurance industry, including increased competition from insurance companies, technology companies and the financial services industry, as well as the shift away from traditional insurance markets;

Our ability to attract, retain and enhance qualified personnel;

Changes in current U.S. economic conditions;

Competition from others in or entering into the insurance agency, wholesale brokerage, insurance programs and related service business;

Conditions that result in reduced insurer capacity;

The integration of our operations with those of businesses or assets we have acquired or may acquire in the future and the failure to realize the expected benefits of such integration;

Quarterly and annual variations in our commissions that result from the timing of policy renewals and the net effect of new and lost business production;

Risks that could negatively affect our acquisition strategy, including continuing consolidation among insurance intermediaries and the increasing presence of private equity investors driving up valuations;

The possibility that one of the financial institutions we use fails or is taken over by the U.S. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC)

Our ability to forecast liquidity needs through at least the end of 2017;

Uncertainty in our business practices and compensation arrangements due to potential changes in regulations;

Our ability to renew or replace expiring leases;

Regulatory changes that could reduce our profitability or growth by increasing compliance costs, technology compliance, restricting the products or services we may sell, the markets we may enter, the methods by which we may sell our products and services, or the prices we may charge for our services and the form of compensation we may accept from our customers, carriers and third parties.

Outcomes of existing or future legal proceedings and governmental investigations;

Intangible asset risk, including the possibility that our goodwill may become impaired in the future;

Policy cancellations and renewal terms, which can be unpredictable;

A decrease in demand for liability insurance as a result of tort reform litigation;

Potential changes to the tax rate that would affect the value of deferred tax assets and liabilities and the impact on income available for investment or distributable to shareholders;

Changes in our credit ratings;

The inherent uncertainty in making estimates, judgments, and assumptions in the preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”);

Volatility in our stock price; and

Our ability to effectively utilize technology to provide improved value for our customers or carrier partners as well as applying effective internal controls and efficiencies in operations;

Other risks and uncertainties as may be detailed from time to time in our public announcements and Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) filings.

Other risks and uncertainties as may be detailed from time to time in our public announcements and Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) filings.

Assumptions as to any of the foregoing and all statements are not based upon historical fact, but rather reflect our current expectations concerning future results and events. Forward-looking statements that we make or that are made by others on our behalf are based upon a knowledge of our business and the environment in which we operate, but because of the factors listed above, among others, actual results may differ from those in the forward-looking statements. Consequently, these cautionary statements qualify all of the forward-looking statements we make herein. We cannot assure you that the results or developments anticipated by us will be realized or, even if substantially realized, that those results or developments will result in the expected consequences for us or affect us, our business or our operations in the way we expect. We caution readers not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of their dates. We assume no obligation to update any of the forward-looking statements.


4


Table of Contents

PART I

ITEM 1. Business.

General

Brown & Brown is a diversified insurance agency, wholesale brokerage, insurance programs and service organization with origins dating from 1939 and is headquartered in Daytona Beach, Florida. The Company markets and sells insurance products and services, primarily in the property, casualty and employee benefits areas. We provide our customers with quality, non-investment insurance contracts, as well as other targeted, customized risk management products and services. As an agent and broker, we do not assume underwriting risks with the exception of the activity in The Wright Insurance Group, LLC (“Wright”). Within Wright, we operate a write-your-own flood insurance carrier, Wright National Flood Insurance Company (“WNFIC”). WNFIC’s entireunderwriting business consists entirely of policies written pursuant to the National Flood Insurance Program (“NFIP”), the program administered by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (“FEMA”), and excess flood insurance policies which are fully reinsured, thereby substantially eliminating WNFIC’s exposure to underwriting risk, as these policies are backed by either FEMA or a reinsurance carrier with an AM Best Company rating of “A” or better.

The Company is compensated for ourits services primarily by commissions paid by insurance companies and to a lesser extent, by fees paid directly by customers for certain services. Commission revenues are usually a percentage of the premium paid by the insured and generally depend upon the type of insurance, the particular insurance company and the nature of the services provided by us. In some limited cases, we share commissions with other agents or brokers who have acted jointly with us in a transaction. We may also receive from an insurance company a “profit-sharing contingent commission,” which is a profit-sharing commission based primarily on underwriting results, but may also contain considerations for volume, growth and/or retention. Fee revenues are generated primarily by: (1) our Services Segment, which provides insurance-related services, including third-party claims administration and comprehensive medical utilization management services in both the workers’ compensation and all-lines liability arenas, as well as Medicare Set-aside services, Social Security disability and Medicare benefits advocacy services, and other claims adjusting services, (2) our National Programs and Wholesale Brokerage Segments, which earn fees primarily for the issuing of insurance policies on behalf of insurance carriers, and (3) our Retail Segment for fees received in lieu of commissions. The amount of our revenues from commissions and fees is a function of several factors, including continued new business production, retention of existing customers, acquisitions and fluctuations in insurance premium rates and “insurable exposure units,” which are units that insurance companies use to measure or express insurance exposed to risk (such as property values, sales and payroll levels) to determine what premium to charge the insured. Insurance companies establish these premium rates based upon many factors, including loss experience, risk profile and reinsurance rates paid by such insurance companies, none of which we control.

As of December 31, 2016,2019, our activities were conducted in 237311 locations in 4144 states as follows, as well as in England, Bermuda, and the Cayman Islands:

Florida

52

 

 

Virginia

6

 

Rhode Island

2

California

29

 

 

Arkansas

5

 

Tennessee

2

Texas

20

 

 

Colorado

5

 

Alabama

1

New York

19

 

 

Connecticut

4

 

Delaware

1

Massachusetts

16

 

 

Hawaii

4

 

Iowa

1

Washington

15

 

 

Indiana

4

 

Maine

1

New Jersey

14

 

 

Michigan

4

 

Mississippi

1

Pennsylvania

12

 

 

Wisconsin

4

 

Montana

1

Georgia

10

 

 

Kentucky

3

 

North Carolina

1

Louisiana

10

 

 

Maryland

3

 

New Hampshire

1

Minnesota

9

 

 

New Mexico

3

 

Nevada

1

Oregon

9

 

 

Ohio

3

 

South Dakota

1

Illinois

8

 

 

Oklahoma

3

 

Utah

1

Arizona

7

 

 

South Carolina

3

 

Vermont

 1

Missouri

6

 

 

Kansas

2

 

 

 

Florida41
 Connecticut4 New Hampshire2
California25
 Indiana4 Rhode Island2
New York19
 Michigan4 Tennessee2
New Jersey14
 Minnesota4 Delaware1
Washington12
 Oklahoma4 Kansas1
Texas11
 Virginia4 Maryland1
Georgia10
 Arkansas3 Mississippi1
Louisiana8
 New Mexico3 Nevada1
Massachusetts7
 Ohio3 North Carolina1
Oregon7
 South Carolina3 Utah1
Pennsylvania7
 Hawaii2 Vermont1
Colorado6
 Kentucky2 West Virginia1
Illinois6
 Missouri2 Wisconsin1
Arizona4
 Montana2   

Industry Overview

Premium pricing within the property and casualty insurance underwriting (risk-bearing) industry has historically been cyclical in nature and has varied widely based upon market conditions with a “hard” market in which premium rates are increasing or a “soft” market, characterized by stable or declining premium rates in many lines and geographic areas. Premium pricing is influenced by many factors including loss experience, interest rates and the availability of capital being deployed into the insurance market in search of returns.

5


Table of Contents

Segment Information

Our business is divided into four reportable segments: (1) the Retail Segment;Segment, (2) the National Programs Segment;Segment, (3) the Wholesale Brokerage Segment;Segment and (4) the Services Segment. The Retail Segment provides a broad range of insurance products and services to commercial, public and quasi-public entities, and to professional and individual customers.customers, and non-insurance risk-mitigating products through our automobile dealer services (“F&I”) businesses. The National Programs Segment, which acts as a managing general agent (“MGA”), provides professional liability and related package products for certain professionals, a range of insurance products for individuals, flood coverage, and targeted products and services designated for specific industries, trade groups, governmental entities and market niches, all of which are delivered through a nationwide networksnetwork of independent agents, including Brown & Brown retail agents. The Wholesale Brokerage Segment markets and sells excess and surplus commercial and personal lines insurance, primarily through independent agents and brokers, as well as Brown & Brown retail agents. The Services Segment provides insurance-related services, including third-party claims administration and comprehensive medical utilization management services in both the workers’ compensation and all-lines liability arenas, as well as Medicare Set-aside services, Social Security disability and Medicare benefits advocacy services and claims adjusting services.

The following table summarizes (1) the commissions and fees revenue generated by each of our reportable operating segments for 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014,2017, and (2) the percentage of our total commissions and fees revenue represented by each segment for each such period:

(in thousands, except percentages)

 

2019

 

 

%

 

 

2018

 

 

%

 

 

2017

 

 

%

 

Retail Segment

 

$

1,366,016

 

 

 

57.3

%

 

$

1,041,691

 

 

 

51.8

%

 

$

942,247

 

 

 

50.7

%

National Programs Segment

 

 

516,915

 

 

 

21.7

%

 

 

493,878

 

 

 

24.6

%

 

 

479,017

 

 

 

25.8

%

Wholesale Brokerage Segment

 

 

309,426

 

 

 

13.0

%

 

 

286,364

 

 

 

14.2

%

 

 

271,141

 

 

 

14.6

%

Services Segment

 

 

193,641

 

 

 

8.1

%

 

 

189,041

 

 

 

9.4

%

 

 

165,073

 

 

 

8.9

%

Other

 

 

(1,261

)

 

 

(0.1

)%

 

 

(1,117

)

 

 

(0.0

)%

 

 

(208

)

 

 

(0.0

)%

Total

 

$

2,384,737

 

 

 

100.0

%

 

$

2,009,857

 

 

 

100.0

%

 

$

1,857,270

 

 

 

100.0

%

(in thousands, except percentages)2016 % 2015 % 2014 %
Retail Segment$916,723
 52.0 % $867,762
 52.4 % $823,211
 52.5%
National Programs Segment447,808
 25.4 % 428,473
 25.9 % 397,326
 25.3%
Wholesale Brokerage Segment242,813
 13.8 % 216,638
 13.1 % 211,512
 13.5%
Services Segment156,082
 8.8 % 145,375
 8.8 % 136,482
 8.7%
Other(639)  % (1,297) (0.2)% (1,071) %
Total$1,762,787
 100 % $1,656,951
 100 % $1,567,460
 100%

We conduct all of our operations within the United States of America, except for one wholesale brokerageWholesale Brokerage operation based in England, one National Programs operation in Canada and retailRetail operations based in Bermuda and The Cayman Islands. These operations generated $14.5$17.7 million, $13.4$15.2 million and $13.3$15.9 million of revenues for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014,2017, respectively. We do not have any material foreign long-lived assets.

See Note 1517 to the Consolidated Financial Statements and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” for additional segment financial data relating to our business.

Retail Segment

As of December 31, 2016,2019, our Retail Segment employed 3,981 full-time equivalent5,406  employees. Our retail insurance agency business provides a broad range of insurance products and services to commercial, public and quasi-public entities, professional and individual customers.customers, and non-insurance risk-mitigating products through our automobile dealer services (“F&I”) businesses. The categories of insurance we principally sell include: property insurance relating to physical damage to property and resultant interruption of business or extra expense caused by fire, windstorm or other perils; casualty insurance relating to legal liabilities, professional liability including directors and officers, cyber-liability,commercial packages, group medical, workers’ compensation, commercialproperty risk and private passenger automobile coverages; and fidelity and surety bonds.general liability. We also sell and service group and individual life, accident, disability, health, hospitalization, medical, dental and other ancillary insurance products.

No material part of our retail business is attributable to a single customer or a few customers. During 2016,2019, commissions and fees from our largest single Retail Segment customer represented three tenths of one percent (0.3%)(0.3)% of the Retail Segment’s total commissions and fees revenue.

fees.

In connection with the selling and marketing of insurance coverages, we provide a broad range of related services to our customers, such as risk management andstrategies, loss control surveys and analysis, consultation in connection with placing insurance coverages and claims processing.


National Programs Segment

As of December 31, 2016,2019, our National Programs Segment employed 1,863 full-time equivalent2,004 employees. Our National Programs Segment works with over 40100 well-capitalized carrier partners, offering more than 50over 40 programs, which can be grouped into five broad categories;categories: (1) Professional Programs;Programs, (2) Arrowhead Insurance Programs;Personal Lines Programs, (3) Commercial Programs;Programs, (4) Public Entity-Related Programs;Programs, and (5) the National Flood Program:

Professional Programs. Professional Programs provide professional liability and related package insurance products tailored to the needs of specific professional groups. Professional Programs negotiatesnegotiate policy forms and coverage options with their specific insurance carriers. Securing endorsements of these products from a professional association or sponsoring company is also an integral part of their function. Professional Programs affiliate with professional groups, including but not limited to, dentists, oral surgeons, hygienists, lawyers, CPAs, optometrists, opticians, ophthalmologists, insurance agents, financial advisors, registered representatives, securities broker-dealers, benefit administrators, real estate brokers, real estate title agents and escrow agents. In addition, Professional Programs encompasses supplementary insurance-related products to include weddings, events, medical facilities and cyber-liability.

6


Table of Contents

Below are brief descriptions of the Professional Programs:

Healthcare Professionals: Allied Protector Plan® (“APP®”) specializes in customized professional liability and business insurance programs for individual practitioners and businesses in the healthcare industry. The APP program offers liability insurance coverage for, among others, dental hygienists and dental assistants, home health agencies, physical therapy clinics, and medical directors. Also available through the APP program is cyber/data breach insurance offering a solution to privacy breaches and information security exposures tailored to the needs of healthcare organizations.
Certified Public Accountants: The CPA Protector Plan® is a specialty insurance program offering comprehensive professional liability insurance solutions and risk management services to CPA practitioners and their firms nationwide. Optional coverage enhancements include: Employment Practices Liability, Employee Dishonesty, Non-Profit Directors and Officers, as well as Network Security and Privacy Protection Coverage.

Dentists: First initiated in 1969, the Professional Protector Plan®Plan® (“PPP®PPP®”) for Dentists provides dental professionals insurance products including professional and general liability, property, employment practices liability, workers’ compensation, claims and risk management. The PPP recognized the importance of policyholder and customer service and developed a customized, proprietary, web-based rating and policy issuance system, which in turn provides a seamless policy delivery resource and access to policy information on a real time basis. Obtaining endorsements from state and local dental societies and associations plays an integral role in the PPP partnership. The PPPAlso available through the Dentists program is offered in all 50 states,cyber/data breach insurance offering a solution to privacy breaches and information security exposures tailored to the Districtneeds of Columbia, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands.

healthcare organizations.

Financial Professionals: CalSurance® CalSurance® and CITA Insurance Services®Services® have specialized in this niche since 1980 andto offer professional liability programs designed for insurance agents, financial advisors, registered representatives, securities broker-dealers, benefit administrators, real estate brokers and real estate title agents. A component of CalSurance is Lancer Claims Services, which provides specialty claims administration for insurance companies underwriting CalSurance product lines.

Lawyers: The Lawyer’s Protector Plan®Plan® (“LPP®LPP®”) has been providing professional liability insurance for over 30 years with a niche focus on law firms with fewer than 20 attorneys. The LPP program handles all aspects of insurance operations including underwriting, distribution management, policy issuance and claims. The LPP is offered in 44 states and the District of Columbia.

Optometrists, Opticians, and Ophthalmologists: Since 1973 the Optometric Protector Plan®Plan® (“OPP®OPP®”), provides professional liability, general liability, property, workers’ compensation insurance and risk management programs for eye care professionals nationwide. Our carrier partners offer specialty insurance products tailored to the eye care profession, and our agents and brokers are chosen for their expertise. The OPP is offered in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. Through our strategic carrier partnerships, we also offer professional liability coverage to chiropractors, podiatrists and physicians nationwide.

Professional Risk Specialty Group: Professional Risk Specialty Group (“PRSG”) has been providing Errors & Omissions/Professional Liability/Malpractice Insurance for over 22 years both in a direct retail sales and brokering capacity. PRSG has been an exclusive State Administrator for a Lawyers Professional Liability Program since 1994 in Florida, Louisiana, and Puerto Rico, and has state appointments in 34 other states. The admitted Lawyers Program focuses on law firms with fewer than 20 attorneys, and the non-admitted program is for firms with 20 or more attorneys and is available for primary or excess coverage. PRSG is also involved in direct sales and brokering for other professionals, such as accountants, architects & engineers, medical malpractice, directors & officers, employment practices liability, title agency E&O and miscellaneous E&O.
Real Estate Title Professionals: TitlePac® provides professional liability products and services designed for real estate title agents and escrow agents in 47 states and the District of Columbia.

Wedding Protector Plan® and Protector Plan® for Events provide an online wedding/private event cancellation and postponement insurance policy that offers financial protection if certain unfortunate or unforeseen events should occur during the period leading up to and including the wedding/event date. Liability and liquor liability is available as an option. Both the Wedding Protector Plan and Protector Plan for Events are offered in 47 states.

Physicians: The Physicians Protector Plan program provides professional liability insurance solutions for physicians on an admitted basis in several key states. The program offers comprehensive insurance solutions and provides risk management benefits and claims services.

Professional Risk Specialty Group: Professional Risk Specialty Group (“PRSG”) has been providing errors & omissions (“E&O”), professional liability and malpractice insurance for over 22 years both in a direct retail sales and brokering capacity. PRSG has been an exclusive state administrator for a Lawyers Professional Liability Program since 1994. The admitted Lawyers Professional Liability Program focuses on law firms with fewer than 20 attorneys, and the non-admitted Lawyers Professional Liability Program is for firms with 20 or more attorneys and is available for primary or excess coverage. PRSG is also involved in direct sales and brokering for other professionals, such as accountants, architects & engineers, medical malpractice, directors & officers, employment practices liability, title agency E&O and miscellaneous E&O.    

Real Estate Title Professionals: TitlePac® provides professional liability products and services designed for real estate title agents and escrow agents.

Wedding Protector Plan®and Protector Plan®for Events: These programs provide an online wedding and private event cancellation and postponement insurance policy that offers financial protection if certain unfortunate or unforeseen events should occur during the period leading up to and including the wedding or event date. Liability and liquor liability are available as options.

The Professional Protector Plan® for Dentists and the Lawyer’s Protector Plan® are marketed and sold primarily through a national network of independent agencies and also through our Brown & Brown retail offices; however, certainoffices. Certain professional liability programs, CalSurance® and TitlePac®, are principally marketed and sold directly to our insured customers. Under our agency agreements with the insurance companies that underwrite these programs, we often have authority to bind coverages (subject to established guidelines), to bill and collect premiums and, in some cases, to adjust claims. For the programs that we market through independent agencies, we receive a wholesale commission or “override,” which is then shared with these independent agencies.

Arrowhead

Personal Lines Programs. Arrowhead is an MGA, General Agent (“GA”), and Program Administrator (“PA”) to the property and casualty insurance industry. Arrowhead acts as a virtual insurer providingand can provide outsourced product development, marketing, underwriting, actuarial, compliance and claims and other administrative services to insurance carrier partners. As an MGA, Arrowhead has the authority to underwrite, bind insurance carriers, issue policies, collect premiums and provide administrative and claims services.

Below are brief descriptions of the ArrowheadPersonal Lines Programs:

All Risk: is a program writing all risks meaning that any risk that the contract does not specifically omit is automatically covered. The coverages usually include commercial earthquake, wind, fire

Personal Property: mono-line property coverage for homeowners and flood. The All Risk program writes insurance on both a primary and excess, shared and layered programs.

Architects and Engineering: operating as Arrowhead Design Insurance (“ADI”), is a leading writer of professional liability insurance for architects, engineers and environmental consultants. ADI is a national program writingrenters in all 50 states and the District of Columbia.
Automotive Aftermarket: launched in 2012, writes commercial package insurance for non-dealership automotive services such as mechanical repair shops, brake shops, transmissions shops, oil and lube shops, parts retailers and wholesalers, tire retailers and wholesalers, and auto recyclers.
Commercial Auto: for vehicles owned by a business (no heavy vehicles or livery operations) in California, Texas and Georgia.
Earthquake and DIC: is a Differences-in-Conditions (“DIC”) Program, writing notably earthquake and flood insurance coverages to commercial property owners. The Earthquake and DIC program writes insurance on both a primary and excess layer basis.
Marine: is a national program manager and wholesale producer of marine insurance products including yachts and high performance boats, small boats, commercial marine and marine artisan contractors.
Tribal: provides tailored solutions across multiple lines of business to sovereign Indian nations.
Manufactured Housing: package policies in all states for manufactured home communities, including mobile home parks, manufactured home dealers and RV parks.
Forestry: logging equipment specialist for mobile equipment typically to the logging industry in Southeast U.S.
Affinity programs: Programs provided for package coverage to booksellers and security alarm installers.
Personal Property: mono-line property coverage for homeowners and renters in numerous states.
Real Estate Errors & Omissions: writes errors and omissions insurance for small to medium-sized residential real estate agents and brokers in California. Coverage includes real estate brokerage, property management, escrow, appraisal, leasing and consulting services.    
numerous states.

Residential Earthquake: specializes in mono-line residential earthquake coverage for California home and condominium owners.

owners in several states, including California.

7


Table of Contents

Wheels:provides private passenger automobile and motorcycle coverage for a range of drivers. Arrowhead’s auto program offers two personal auto coverage types: one traditional non-standard auto product offering minimum state required liability limits and another targeting full coverage, multi-vehicle risks. The auto product is written in several states including California, Georgia, Michigan, and Alabama, South Carolina and Tennessee.

Workers’ Compensation: provides workers’ compensation insurance coverage primarily for California-based insureds. Arrowhead’s workers’ compensation program targets industry segments such as agriculture, contractors, food services, horticulture and manufacturing.

Commercial Programs. Commercial Programs marketsmarket products and services to specific industries, trade groups, and market niches. Most of these products and services are marketed and sold primarily through independent agents, including certain of our retailRetail Segment offices. However, a number of these products and services are also marketed and sold directly to insured customers. Under agency agreements with the insurance companies that underwrite these programs, we often have authority to bind coverages (subject to established guidelines), to bill and collect premiums and, in some cases, to adjust claims.

Below are brief descriptions of the Commercial Programs:

AFC Insurance, Inc.: (“AFC”)(“Humanity Plus Program”)

Affinity programs provide package coverage to booksellers and security alarm installers.

All Risk is a Program Administrator specializing in niche property & casualty products for a wide range of for-profitprogram writing all risks meaning that any risk that the contract does not specifically omit is automatically covered. The coverages usually include commercial earthquake, wind, fire and nonprofit human & social service organizations. Eligible risks include addiction treatment centers, adult day care centers, group homes, services for the developmentally disabledflood. The All Risk program writes insurance on both primary and more. AFC’s nationwide comprehensive program offers all lines of coverage. AFC also has a separate program for independent pizza/deli restaurants.

excess, shared and layered programs.

American Specialty Insurance & Risk Services, Inc.:provides insurance and risk management services for customers in professional sports, motor sports, amateur sports and the entertainment industry.

Bellingham Underwriters Inc.: was established in 1997 and has primarily focused on the commercial transportation industry and those that are in the business of supporting it. The trucking program is specifically designed to handle all coverages a trucker on the road might need. Other programs include specialty auto, repair services, forest products and commercial ambulance.

Automotive Aftermarket was launched in 2012 and writes commercial package insurance for non-dealership automotive services such as mechanical repair shops, brake shops, transmissions shops, oil and lube shops, parts retailers and wholesalers, tire retailers and wholesalers, and auto recyclers. This program distributes product through a direct sales force, independent agencies and our Retail Segment.

Bellingham Underwriters focuses on the commercial transportation industry and companies that are in the business of supporting the commercial transportation industry. The trucking program is specifically designed to handle all coverages for a truck owner. Other programs include specialty auto, repair services, forest products and commercial ambulance.

Core Commercial targets accounts paying under $100,000 in annual premium, this program offers business owner’s policies (BOPs) and commercial package coverages for a broad range of industries nationwide.

Daily Rental provides loaner car coverage for auto dealerships.

Earthquake and DIC is a Differences-in-Conditions (“DIC”) Program, writing notably earthquake and flood insurance coverages to commercial property owners. The Earthquake and DIC program writes insurance on both a primary and excess layer basis.

Fabricare: Irving Weber Associates, Inc. (“IWA”) has specialized in this niche since 1946, providing package insurance including workers’ compensation to dry cleaners, linen supply and uniform rental operations. IWA also offers insurance programs for independent grocery stores and restaurants.

Florida Intracoastal Underwriters, Limited Company: (“FIU”) is a MGA that specializes in providing insurance coverage for coastal and inland high-value condominiums and apartments. FIU has developed a specialty insurance facility to support the underwriting activities associated with these risks.
Parcel Insurance Plan®: is a specialty insurance agency providing insurance coverage to commercial and private shippers for small packages and parcels with insured values of less than $25,000 each.

Florida Intracoastal Underwriters, Limited Company (“FIU”) specializes in providing insurance coverage for coastal and inland high-value condominiums and apartments. FIU has developed a specialty insurance facility to support the underwriting activities associated with these risks.

Forestry is a logging equipment specialist for mobile equipment typically to the logging industry in Southeast U.S.

Health Special Risk, Inc. provides accident & health, special events insurance products, and administrative services to licensed agents, brokers, and insurance companies across the U.S.

Manufactured Housing provides package policies in all states for manufactured home communities, including mobile home parks, manufactured home dealers and RV parks.

Parcel Insurance Plan® is a specialty insurance agency providing insurance coverage to commercial and private shippers for small packages and parcels with insured values of less than $25,000 each.

Proctor Financial, Inc.: (“Proctor”) provides insurance programs and compliance solutions for financial institutions that service mortgage loans. Proctor’s products include lender-placed hazard and flood insurance, full insurance outsourcing, mortgage impairment, and blanket equity insurance. Proctor acts as a wholesaler and writes surplus lines property business for its financial institution customers. Proctor receives payments for insurance compliance tracking as well as commissions on lender-placed insurance.

Sigma Underwriting Managers: is the nationwide wind catastrophic property insurance specialists

Sigma Underwriting Managers is a nationwide wind catastrophic property insurance specialist for commercial and habitational properties and has over 100 years of combined underwriting experience. The commercial nationwide program is designed to write all types of low to medium-hazard properties including adult living facilities, hotels/motels, medical offices, shopping centers, restaurants, warehouses and churches. The Florida habitational property program is a high-valued property program for commercial residential accounts in Florida.

Railroad: The commercial nationwide program is designed to write all types of low-to-medium-hazard properties including adult living facilities, hotels/motels, medical offices, shopping centers, restaurants, warehouses and churches. The Florida habitational property program is a high-valued property program for commercial residential accounts.

8


Table of Contents

Railroad Protector Plan® (“RRPP®”) provides insurance products for contractors, manufacturers and wholesalers supporting the railroad industry (not the railroads themselves) in 47 states.. The insurance coverages include general liability, property, inland marine, commercial auto and umbrella.

Towing Operators Protector Plan®: (“TOPP®”) serves 21 states providing insurance coverage including general liability, commercial auto, garage keeper’s legal liability, property and motor truck cargo coverage.
Wright Specialty Insurance Agency, LLC: provides insurance products for specialty programs such as food, grocery, K-12 education, and franchise programs that are offered throughout the U.S.

Tribal provides tailored solutions across multiple lines of business to sovereign Indian nations.

Workers’ Compensation provides workers’ compensation insurance coverage primarily for California-based insureds. Arrowhead’s workers’ compensation program targets industry segments such as agriculture, contractors, food services, horticulture and manufacturing.

Wright Specialty Insurance Agency, LLC provides insurance products for specialty industries such as food, grocery, K-12 education and franchise programs that are offered throughout the U.S.

Public Entity-Related Programs. Public Entity-Related Programs administersadminister various insurance trusts specifically created for cities, counties, municipalities, school boards, special taxing districts and quasi-governmental agencies. These insurance coverages can range from providing fully insuredfully-insured programs to establishing risk retention insurance pools to excess and facultative specific coverages.

Below are brief descriptions of the Public Entity-Related Programs:

Public Risk Underwriters of Indiana, LLC: doing business as Downey Insurance is a program administrator of insurance trusts offering tailored property and casualty insurance products, risk management consulting, third-party administration and related services designed for cities, counties, municipalities, schools, special taxing districts, and other public entities in the State of Indiana.

Public Risk Underwriters of Indiana, LLC: doing business as Downey Insurance is a program administrator of insurance trusts offering tailored property and casualty insurance products, risk management consulting, third-party administration and related services designed for cities, counties, municipalities, schools, special taxing districts and other public entities in the State of Indiana.

Public Risk Underwriters of The Northwest, Inc.: doing business as Clear Risk Solutions, a program administrator of insurance trusts offering tailored property and casualty insurance products, risk management consulting, third-party administration and related services designed for cities, counties, municipalities, school boards and non-profit organizations in the State of Washington.


Public Risk Underwriters of Illinois, LLC: doing business as Ideal Insurance Agency is a program administrator offering tailored property and casualty insurance products, risk management consulting, third-party administration and related services designed for municipalities, schools, fire districts and other public entities in the State of Illinois.

Public Risk Underwriters of New Jersey, Inc.: provides administrative services and insurance procurement for the Statewide Insurance Fund (“Statewide”). Statewide is a municipal joint insurance fund comprising coverages for counties, municipalities, utility authorities, community colleges and emergency services entities in New Jersey.
Public Risk Underwriters of Florida, Inc.: is the program administrator for the Preferred Governmental Insurance Trust offering tailored property and casualty insurance products, risk management consulting, third-party administration and related services designed for cities, counties, municipalities, schools, special taxing districts and other public entities in the State of Florida.
Wright Risk Management Company, LLC: is a program administrator for the New York Schools Insurance Reciprocal and the New York Municipal Insurance Reciprocal offering tailored property and casualty insurance products, risk management consulting, third-party administration and related services designed for cities, counties, municipalities, schools, special taxing districts and other public entities in the State of New York.

Public Risk Underwriters of New Jersey, Inc.: provides administrative services and insurance procurement for the Statewide Insurance Fund (“Statewide”). Statewide is a municipal joint insurance fund comprising coverages for counties, municipalities, utility authorities, community colleges and emergency services entities in New Jersey.

Public Risk Underwriters of Florida, Inc.: is the program administrator for the Preferred Governmental Insurance Trust offering tailored property and casualty insurance products, risk management consulting, third-party administration and related services designed for cities, counties, municipalities, schools, special taxing districts and other public entities in the State of Florida.

Wright Risk Management Company, LLC: is a program administrator for the New York Schools Insurance Reciprocal and the New York Municipal Insurance Reciprocal offering tailored property and casualty insurance products, risk management consulting, third-party administration and related services designed for cities, counties, municipalities, schools, special taxing districts and other public entities in the State of New York.

National Flood Program. Operating as Wright operates a floodFlood, WNFIC is an insurance carrier, WNFIC, which is a Wright subsidiary. WNFIC’s entirecarrier. This business consists ofprovides policies written pursuant to the NFIP, the program administered by FEMA, andas well as excess flood insurance policies, all of which are fully reinsured, thereby substantially eliminating WNFIC’s exposure to underwriting risk, given that these policies are backed by either FEMA or a reinsurance carrier with an AM Best Company rating of “A” or better.

Through Wright National Flood Insurance Services, the Company acts as an MGA, selling private primary flood insurance policies for a carrier partner.

Wholesale Brokerage Segment

At December 31, 2016,2019, our Wholesale Brokerage Segment employed 1,074 full-time equivalent1,316 employees. Our Wholesale Brokerage Segment markets and sells excess and surplus commercial insurance products and services to retail insurance agencies (including Brown & Brown retail offices). The Wholesale Brokerage Segment offices represent various U.S. and U.K. surplus lines insurance companies. Additionally, certain offices are also Lloyd’s of London correspondents. The Wholesale Brokerage Segment also represents admitted insurance companies for purposes of affording access to such companies for smaller agencies that otherwise do not have access to large insurance company representation. Excess and surplus insurance products encompass many insurance coverages, including personal lines, homeowners, yachts, jewelry, commercial property and casualty, commercial automobile, garage, restaurant, builder’s risk and inland marine lines. Difficult-to-insure general liability and products liability coverages are a specialty, as is excess workers’ compensation coverage. Wholesale brokers solicit business through mailings and direct contact with retail agency representatives. During 2016,2019, commissions and fees from our largest Wholesale Brokerage Segment customer represented approximately 1.2%1.0% of the Wholesale Brokerage Segment’s total commissions and fees revenue.

fees.

9


Table of Contents

Services Segment

At December 31, 2016,2019, our Services Segment employed 917 full-time equivalent1,052 employees and provided a wide range of insurance-related services.

Below are brief descriptions of the businesses within the Services Segment.

The Advocator Group and SSAD assist individuals throughout the United States who are seeking to establish eligibility for coverage under the federal Social Security Disability program and provides health plan selection and enrollment assistance for Medicare beneficiaries. The Advocator Group works closely with employer sponsored group life, disability and health plan participants to assist disabled employees in receiving the education, advocacy and benefit coordination assistance necessary to achieve the fastest possible benefit approvals. In addition, The Advocator Group also provides second injury fund recovery services to the workers’ compensation insurance market.

The Advocator Group, LLC (“The Advocator Group”) and Social Security Advocates for the Disabled LLC (“SSAD”) assist individuals throughout the United States who are seeking to establish eligibility for coverage under the federal Social Security Disability program and provides health plan selection and enrollment assistance for Medicare beneficiaries. These two businesses work closely with employer sponsored group life, disability and health plan participants to assist disabled individuals in receiving the education, advocacy and benefit coordination assistance necessary to achieve the fastest possible benefit approvals. In addition, The Advocator Group also provides second injury fund recovery services to the workers’ compensation insurance market.

American Claims Management (“ACM”)provides third-party administration (“TPA”) services to both the commercial and personal property and casualty insurance markets on a nationwide basis, and provides claims adjusting, administration, subrogation, litigation and data management services to insurance companies, self-insureds, public municipalities, insurance brokers and corporate entities. ACMACM’s services also include managed care, claim investigations, field adjusting and audit services. Approximately 51%64% of ACM’s 2016 net2019 revenues were derived from the various Arrowhead programs in our National Programs Segment, with the remainder generated from third parties.

ICA provides comprehensive claims management solutions for both personal and commercial lines of insurance. ICA is a national service provider for daily claims, vendor management, TPA operations and staff augmentation. ICA offers training and educational opportunities to independent adjusters nationwide in ICA’s regional training facilities. Additional claims services offered by ICA include first notice of loss, fast track, field appraisals, quality control and consulting.

NuQuest provides a full spectrum of Medicare Secondary Payer (“MSP”) statutory compliance services, from Medicare Set-aside Allocation through Professional Administration to over 250 insurance carriers, third-party administrators, self-insured employers, attorneys, brokers and related claims professionals nationwide. Specialty services include medical projections, life care plans, Medicare Set-aside analysis, allocation and administration
Preferred Governmental Claims Solutions (“PGCS”) provides TPA services for government entities and self-funded or fully-insured workers’ compensation and liability plans and trusts. PGCS’ services include claims administration and a dedicated subrogation recovery department.

ICA provides comprehensive claims management solutions for both personal and commercial lines of insurance. ICA is a national service provider for daily claims, catastrophic claims, vendor management, TPA operations and staff augmentation. Additional claims services offered by ICA include first notice of loss, fast track, field appraisals and quality control.

MEDVAL, LLC, provides an end to end solution for Medicare Secondary Payer compliance, including Medicare Set-Aside allocations, conditional payment negotiation and resolution, structured settlements/annuity funding, professional administration, and a post-settlement durable medical equipment and pharmacy program.  MEDVAL’s offerings are all done in-house, and under one umbrella to provide the most consistent and reliable results. 

NuQuest provides a full spectrum of Medicare Secondary Payer statutory compliance services, from Medicare Set-aside Allocation through Professional Administration to over 250 insurance carriers, third-party administrators, self-insured employers, attorneys, brokers and related claims professionals nationwide. Specialty services include medical projections, life care plans, Medicare Set-aside analysis, allocation and administration.

Professional Disability Associates, LLC (“PDA”) is a disability services firm that provides specialty risk resources, including medical, vocational and claim management services to the disability insurance market. PDA has a nationwide physician referral network to address the needs of the industry for claim expertise across multiple specialties. PDA services top disability insurance carriers in the U.S. and Canada, as well as several other insurers, reinsurers, self-insured employers and consulting firms.

Preferred Governmental Claims Solutions (“PGCS”) provides TPA services for government entities and self-funded or fully-insured workers’ compensation and liability plans and trusts. PGCS’ services include claims administration and a dedicated subrogation recovery department.

Protect Professionals Claims Management (“PPCM”) provides TPA services to professional liability insurance markets on a nationwide basis. PPCM’s services include claims adjusting, administration, litigation and data management for professional programs for dentists and lawyers administered by our National Programs Segment.

USISprovides TPA services for insurance entities and self-funded or fully-insured workers’ compensation and liability plans. USIS’s services include claims administration, cost containment consulting, services for secondary disability and subrogation recoveries, and risk management services such as loss control. USIS’s services also include certified and non-certified medical management programs, access to medical networks, case management, and utilization review services certified by URAC, formerly the Utilization Review Accreditation Commission.

In 2016,2019, our threefour largest contracts represented approximately 25.0%20.0% of fees revenues in our Services Segment.

Employees

At December 31, 2016,2019, the Company had 8,297 full-time equivalent10,083 employees. For the purposes of measuring full-time equivalent employees, those working more than 30 hours per week are counted as a full-time equivalent employee and those working less than 30 hours per week are counted as half of a full-time equivalent employee. We have agreements with our sales employees and certain other employees that include provisions: (1) protecting our confidential information and trade secrets;secrets, (2) restricting their ability post-employment to solicit the business of our customers;customers, and (3) preventing the hiring of our employees for a period of time after separation from employment with us. The enforceability of such agreements varies from state to state depending upon applicable law and factual circumstances. The majority of our employment relationships are at-will and terminable by either party at any time; however, the covenants regarding confidential information and non-solicitation of our customers and employees generally extend for a period of at least two years after cessation of employment.

None of our employees are subject to a collective bargaining agreement and we consider our relations with our employees to be good.

10


Table of Contents

Competition

The insurance intermediary business is highly competitive, and numerous firms actively compete with us for customers and insurance markets. Competition in the insurance business is largely based upon innovation, knowledge, terms and conditionconditions of coverage, quality of service and price. A number of firms and banks with substantially greater resources and market presence compete with us.

A number of insurance companies directly sell insurance, primarily to individuals, and do not pay commissions to third-party agents and brokers. In addition, the Internet continues to be a source for direct placement of personal lines insurance business. While it is difficult to quantify the impact on our business from individuals purchasing insurance over the Internet, we believe this risk would generally be isolated to personal lines customers with single-line coverage, or small businesses that do not have a complex insurance program, which represent a small portion of our overall Retail Segment.

Regulation, Licensing and Agency Contracts

We and/or our designated employees must be licensed to act as agents, brokers, intermediaries or third-party administrators by state regulatory authorities in the locations in which we conduct business. Regulations and licensing laws vary by individual state and international location and are often complex.

The applicable licensing laws and regulations in all states and international jurisdictions are subject to amendment or reinterpretation by regulatory authorities, and such authorities are vested in most cases with relatively broad discretion as to the granting, revocation, suspension and renewal of licenses. TheWe endeavor to monitor the licensing of our employees, but the possibility exists that we and/or our employees could be excluded or temporarily suspended from carrying on some or all of our activities in or could otherwise bea particular jurisdiction in addition to being subjected to penalties by a particular jurisdiction.

fines.

Available Information

We are subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and its rules and regulations. The Exchange Act requires us to file reports, proxy statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).SEC. We make available free of charge on our website, at www.bbinsurance.com, our annual reportAnnual Report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act and the rules promulgated thereunder, as soon as reasonably practicable after electronically filing or furnishing such material to the SEC. These documents are posted on our website at www.bbinsurance.comand may be accessed by selecting the “Investor Relations” link and then the “SEC Filings” link.


Copies of these reports, proxy statements and other information can be read and copied at:
SEC Public Reference Room
100 F Street NE
Washington, D.C. 20549
 Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-732-0330. Also, the

The SEC maintains a website that contains reports, proxy statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. These materials may be obtained electronically by accessing the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.

The charters of the Audit, Compensation and Nominating/Governance Committees of our Board of Directors as well as our Corporate Governance Principles, Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and Code of Ethics-CEO and Senior Financial Officers (including any amendments to, or waivers of any provision of any of these charters, principles or codes) are also available on our website or upon request. Requests for copies of any of these documents should be directed in writing to: Corporate Secretary, Brown & Brown, Inc., 220 South Ridgewood Avenue, Daytona Beach, Florida 32114, or by telephone to (386)-252-9601.

ITEM 1A. Risk Factors.

Our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows are subject to, and could be materially adversely affected by, various risks and uncertainties, including, without limitation, those set forth below, any one of which could cause our actual results to vary materially from recent results or our anticipated future results. We present these risk factors grouped by macroeconomiccategory, and the risks factors market factors, and operational factors and notcontained in anyeach respective category are presented in order of potential magnitude of impact.

their relative priority to us.

Risks Related to Our Business

OUR INABILITY TO RETAIN OR HIRE QUALIFIED EMPLOYEES, AS WELL AS THE LOSS OF ANY OF OUR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OR OTHER KEY EMPLOYEES, COULD NEGATIVELY IMPACT OUR ABILITY TO RETAIN EXISTING BUSINESS AND THEREFORE OUR RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION, MAY BE ADVERSELY AFFECTED BY ECONOMIC CONDITIONS THAT RESULT IN REDUCED INSURER CAPACITY.

GENERATE NEW BUSINESS.

Our success depends on our ability to attract and retain skilled and experienced personnel. There is significant competition from within the insurance industry and from businesses outside the industry for exceptional employees, especially in key positions. If we are not able to successfully attract, retain and motivate our employees, our business, financial results and reputation could be materially and adversely affected.

11


Table of Contents

Losing employees who manage or support substantial customer relationships or possess substantial experience or expertise could adversely affect our ability to secure and complete customer engagements, which would adversely affect our results of operations. Also, if any of our key personnel were to join an existing competitor or form a competing company, some of our customers could choose to use the services of that competitor instead of our services. While our key personnel are generally prohibited by contract from soliciting our employees and customers for a two-year period following separation from employment with us, they are not prohibited from competing with us.

In addition, we could be adversely affected if we fail to adequately plan for the succession of our senior leaders and key executives. While we have succession plans in place and we have employment arrangements with certain key executives, these do not guarantee that the services of these executives will continue to be available to us. Although we operate with a decentralized sales and service operating model, the loss of our senior leaders or other key personnel, or our inability to continue to identify, recruit and retain such personnel, could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations depend on the continued capacity of insurance carriers to underwrite risk and provide coverage, which depends in turn on those insurance companies’ ability to procure reinsurance. Capacity could also be reduced by insurance companies failing or withdrawing from writing certain coverages that we offer our customers. We have no control over these matters. To the extent that reinsurance becomes less widely available, we may not be able to procure the amount or types of coverage that our customers desire and the coverage we are able to procure for our customers may be more expensive or limited.

financial condition.

OUR GROWTH STRATEGY DEPENDS, IN PART, ON THE ACQUISITION OF OTHER INSURANCE INTERMEDIARIES, WHICH MAY NOT BE AVAILABLE ON ACCEPTABLE TERMS IN THE FUTURE ANDOR WHICH, IF CONSUMMATED, MAY NOT BE ADVANTAGEOUS TO US.

Our growth strategy partially includes the acquisition of other insurance intermediaries. Our ability to successfully identify suitable acquisition candidates, complete acquisitions, integrate acquired businesses into our operations, and expand into new markets requires us to implement and continuously improve our operations and our financial and management information systems. Integrated, acquired businesses may not achieve levels of revenues or profitability comparable to our existing operations, or otherwise perform as expected. In addition, we compete for acquisition and expansion opportunities with firms and banks that may have substantially greater resources than we do. Acquisitions also involve a number of special risks, such as:as diversion of management’s attention; difficulties in the integration of acquired operations and retention of personnel; increase in expenses and working capital requirements, which could reduce our return on invested capital; entry into unfamiliar markets or lines of business; unanticipated problems or legal liabilities; estimation of the acquisition earn-out payables; and tax and accounting issues, some or all of which could have a material adverse effect on theour results of our operations, financial condition and cash flows. Post-acquisition deterioration of targetsoperating performance could also result in lower or negative earnings contribution and/or goodwill impairment charges.

A CYBERSECURITY ATTACK, OR ANY OTHER INTERRUPTION IN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND/OR DATA SECURITY AND/OR OUTSOURCING RELATIONSHIPS, COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR BUSINESS, FINANCIAL CONDITION AND REPUTATION.

We rely on information technology and third-party vendors to provide effective and efficient service to our customers, process claims, and timely and accurately report information to carriers and which often involves secure processing of confidential sensitive, proprietary and other types of information. Cybersecurity breaches of any of the systems we rely on may result from circumvention of security systems, denial-of-service attacks or other cyber-attacks, hacking, “phishing” attacks, computer viruses, ransomware, malware, employee or insider error, malfeasance, social engineering, physical breaches or other actions, any of which could expose us to data loss, monetary and reputational damages and significant increases in compliance costs. An interruption of our access to, or an inability to access, our information technology, telecommunications or other systems could significantly impair our ability to perform such functions on a timely basis. If sustained or repeated, such a business interruption, system failure or service denial could result in a deterioration of our ability to write and process new and renewal business, provide customer service, pay claims in a timely manner or perform other necessary business functions. We have from time to time experienced cybersecurity breaches, such as computer viruses, unauthorized parties gaining access to our information technology systems and similar incidents, which to date have not had a material impact on our business.

Additionally, we are an acquisitive organization and the process of integrating the information systems of the businesses we acquire is complex and exposes us to additional risk as we might not adequately identify weaknesses in the targets’ information systems, which could expose us to unexpected liabilities or make our own systems more vulnerable to attack. In the future, any material breaches of cybersecurity, or media reports of the same, even if untrue, could cause us to experience reputational harm, loss of customers and revenue, loss of proprietary data, regulatory actions and scrutiny, sanctions or other statutory penalties, litigation, liability for failure to safeguard customers’ information or financial losses. Such losses may not be insured against or not fully covered through insurance we maintain.

While we have invested and continue to invest in technology security initiatives, policies and resources and employee training, entirely eliminating all risk of improper access to private information is not possible. The cost and operational consequences of implementing, maintaining and enhancing further system protections measures could increase significantly as cybersecurity threats increase. As these threats evolve, cybersecurity incidents will be more difficult to detect, defend against and remediate. Any of the foregoing may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and reputation.

12


Table of Contents

RAPID TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE MAY REQUIRE ADDITIONAL RESOURCES AND TIME TO ADEQUATELY RESPOND TO DYNAMICS, WHICH MAY ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR BUSINESS AND OPERATING RESULTS.

Frequent technological changes, new products and services and evolving industry standards are influencing the insurance business. The Internet, for example, is increasingly used to securely transmit benefits and related information to customers and to facilitate business-to-business information exchange and transactions.

We are continuously taking steps to upgrade and expand our information systems capabilities. Maintaining, protecting and enhancing these capabilities to keep pace with evolving industry and regulatory standards, and changing customer preferences, requires an ongoing commitment of significant resources. If the information we rely upon to run our businesses was found to be inaccurate or unreliable or if we fail to effectively maintain our information systems and data integrity, we could experience operational disruptions, regulatory or other legal problems, increases in operating expenses, loss of existing customers, difficulty in attracting new customers, or suffer other adverse consequences.

We are currently underway with a multi-year plan to upgrade many of our technology platforms and anticipate investing a total of $30 million to $40 million, which will have an impact on our operating margins and cash flow during this period. We have not determined, however, if additional resources and time for development and implementation may be required, which if required, may result in short-term, unexpected interruptions or impacts to our business, or may result in a competitive disadvantage in price and/or efficiency, as we develop or implement new technologies.

Our technological development projects may not deliver the benefits we expect once they are completed, or may be replaced or become obsolete more quickly than expected, which could result in the accelerated recognition of expenses. If we do not effectively and efficiently manage and upgrade our technology portfolio regularly, or if the costs of doing so are higher than we expect, our ability to provide competitive services to new and existing customers in a cost-effective manner and our ability to implement our strategic initiatives could be adversely impacted.

CHANGES IN DATA PRIVACY AND PROTECTION LAWS AND REGULATIONS, OR ANY FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH SUCH LAWS AND REGULATIONS, COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR BUSINESS AND FINANCIAL RESULTS.

We are subject to a variety of continuously evolving and developing laws and regulations globally regarding privacy, data protection, and data security, including those related to the collection, storage, handling, use, disclosure, transfer, and security of personal data. Significant uncertainty exists as privacy and data protection laws may be interpreted and applied differently from country to country and may create inconsistent or conflicting requirements. These laws apply to transfers of information among our affiliates, as well as to transactions we enter into with third-party vendors. For example, the European Union adopted a comprehensive General Data Privacy Regulation (“GDPR”) in May 2016 that replaced the former EU Data Protection Directive and related country-specific legislation. The GDPR became fully effective in May 2018 and requires companies to satisfy new requirements regarding the handling of personal and sensitive data, including its use, protection and the ability of persons whose data is stored to correct or delete such data about themselves. Failure to comply with GDPR requirements could result in penalties of up to 4% of worldwide revenue. Complying with the enhanced obligations imposed by the GDPR may result in significant costs to our business and require us to revise certain of our business practices. In addition, legislators and regulators in the U.S. have enacted and are proposing new and more robust privacy and cybersecurity laws and regulations in light of the recent broad-based cyber-attacks at a number of companies, including but not limited to the New York State Department of Financial Services Cybersecurity Requirements for Financial Services Companies and the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018.

These and similar initiatives around the world could increase the cost of developing, implementing or securing our servers and require us to allocate more resources to improved technologies, adding to our IT and compliance costs. In addition, enforcement actions and investigations by regulatory authorities related to data security incidents and privacy violations continue to increase. The enactment of more restrictive laws, rules, regulations or future enforcement actions or investigations could impact us through increased costs or restrictions on our business, and noncompliance could result in regulatory penalties and significant legal liability.

WE DERIVE A SIGNIFICANT PORTION OF OUR COMMISSION REVENUES FROM A LIMITED NUMBER OF INSURANCE COMPANIES, THE LOSS OF WHICH COULD RESULT IN ADDITIONAL EXPENSE AND LOSS OF MARKET SHARE.

For the year ended December 31, 2019, no insurance company accounted for more than 4.0% of our total core commissions. For each of the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, approximately 5.0% of our total core commissions was derived from insurance policies underwritten by one insurance company. Should this insurance company seek to terminate its arrangements with us or to otherwise decrease the number of insurance policies underwritten for us, we believe that other insurance companies are available to underwrite the business, although some additional expense and loss of market share could result.

13


Table of Contents

BECAUSE OUR BUSINESS IS HIGHLY CONCENTRATED IN ARIZONA, CALIFORNIA, FLORIDA, GEORGIA, ILLINOIS, INDIANA, KANSAS, KENTUCKY, MASSACHUSETTS, MICHIGAN, MINNESOTA, NEW JERSEY, NEW YORK, NORTH CAROLINA, OREGON, PENNSYLVANIA, TEXAS, VIRGINIA, WASHINGTON AND WASHINGTON,WISCONSIN, ADVERSE ECONOMIC CONDITIONS, NATURAL DISASTERS, OR REGULATORY CHANGES IN THESE STATES COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR FINANCIAL CONDITION.

A significant portion of our business is concentrated in Arizona, California, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Texas, Virginia, Washington and Washington.Wisconsin. For the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014,2017, we derived $1,571.9$2,106.3 million or 89.0%88.1%, $1,465.9$1,976.5 million or 88.3%88.6%, and $1,376.5$1,692.6 million or 87.4%90.0%, of our revenues,annualized revenue, respectively, from our operations located in these states. We believe the current regulatory environment for insurance intermediaries in these states is no more restrictive than in other states. The insurance business is primarily a state-regulated industry, and therefore, state legislatures may enact laws that adversely affect the insurance industry. Because our business is concentrated in the states identified above, we face greater exposure to unfavorable changes in regulatory conditions in those states than insurance intermediaries whose operations are more diversified through a greater number of states. In addition, the occurrence of adverse economic conditions, natural or other disasters, or other circumstances specific to or otherwise significantly impacting these states could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. We are susceptible to losses and interruptions caused by hurricanes (particularly in Florida, where we have 4152 offices and our


headquarters) headquarters, as well as in Texas, where we have 20 offices), earthquakes (including in California, where we maintain a number ofhave 29 offices), power shortages, telecommunications failures, water shortages, floods, fire, extreme weather conditions, geopolitical events such as terrorist acts and other natural or man-made disasters. Our insurance coverage with respect to natural disasters is limited and is subject to deductibles and coverage limits. Such coverage may not be adequate, or may not continue to be available at commercially reasonable rates and terms.

OUR CORPORATE CULTURE HAS CONTRIBUTED TO OUR SUCCESS, AND IF WE DERIVECANNOT MAINTAIN THIS CULTURE, OR IF WE EXPERIENCE A SIGNIFICANT PORTION OFCHANGE IN MANAGEMENT, MANAGEMENT PHILOSOPHY, OR BUSINESS STRATEGY, OUR COMMISSION REVENUES FROM A LIMITED NUMBER OF INSURANCE COMPANIES, THE LOSS OF WHICH COULD RESULT IN ADDITIONAL EXPENSE AND LOSS OF MARKET SHARE.

ForBUSINESS MAY BE HARMED.

We believe that a significant contributor to our success has been our corporate culture as a lean, decentralized, highly competitive, profit-oriented sales and service organization.  As we grow, including from the year ended December 31, 2016, no insurance company accounted for more than 6.0%integration of employees and businesses acquired in connection with previous or future acquisitions, we may find it difficult to maintain important aspects of our total core commissions. Forcorporate culture, which could negatively affect our profitability and/or our ability to retain and recruit people of the years ended December 31, 2015highest integrity and 2014, approximately 7.3% and 7.0% respectively, ofquality who are essential to our total core commissions was derived from insurance policies underwritten by one insurance company. Should this insurance company seekfuture success.  We may face pressure to terminate its arrangements with us,change our culture as we believe that other insurance companiesgrow, particularly if we experience difficulties in attracting competent personnel who are availablewilling to underwrite the business, and we could likely moveembrace our business to one of these other insurance companies, although some additional expense and loss of market share could possibly result.

OUR CURRENT MARKET SHARE MAY DECREASE AS A RESULT OF INCREASED COMPETITION FROM INSURANCE COMPANIES, TECHNOLOGY COMPANIES AND THE FINANCIAL SERVICES INDUSTRY.
The insurance intermediary business is highly competitive and we actively compete with numerous firms for customers and insurance companies, many of which have relationships with insurance companies or have a significant presence in niche insurance markets that may give them an advantage over us. Other competitive concerns may include the quality of our products and services, our pricing and the ability of some of our customers to self-insure and the entrance of technology companies into the insurance intermediary business. A number of insurance companies are engaged in the direct sale of insurance, primarily to individuals, and do not pay commissions to agents and brokers. In addition, and to the extent that banks, securities firms and insurance companies affiliate, the financial services industry may experience further consolidation, and we therefore may experience increased competition from insurance companies and the financial services industry, as a growing number of larger financial institutions increasingly, and aggressively, offer a wider variety of financial services, including insurance intermediary services.
QUARTERLY AND ANNUAL VARIATIONS IN OUR COMMISSIONS THAT RESULT FROM THE TIMING OF POLICY RENEWALS AND THE NET EFFECT OF NEW AND LOST BUSINESS PRODUCTION MAY HAVE UNEXPECTED EFFECTS ON OUR RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
Our commission income (including profit-sharing contingent commissions and override commissions) can vary quarterly or annually due to the timing of policy renewals and the net effect of new and lost business production. We do not control the factors that cause these variations. Specifically, customers’ demand for insurance products can influence the timing of renewals, new business and lost business (which includes policies that are not renewed), and cancellations.culture.  In addition, as discussed,our organization grows and we rely on insurance companies for the payment of certain commissions. Because these payments are processed internally by these insurance companies,required to implement more complex organizational structures, or if we experience a change in management, management philosophy, or business strategy, we may not receivefind it increasingly difficult to maintain the beneficial aspects of our corporate culture, such as our decentralized sales and service operating model, which could negatively impact our future success.

We face a paymentvariety of risks in our services segement, including our third-party claims administration operations, that is otherwise expectedare distinct from those we face in our insurance intermediary operations.

Our Services Segment, including our third-party claims administration operations, face a particularvariety of risks distinct from those faced by our insurance company in a particular quarter or year until afterintermediary operations, including the endrisks that:

The favorable trend among both insurance companies and self-insured entities toward outsourcing various types of claims administration and risk management services may reverse or slow, causing our revenues or revenue growth to decline;

Concentration of large amounts of revenue with certain customers may result in greater exposure to the potential negative effects of lost business due to changes in management at such customers or for other reasons;

Contracting terms will become less favorable or the margins on our services may decrease due to increased competition, regulatory constraints, or other developments;

Our revenue is impacted by claims volumes, which are dependent upon a number of factors and difficult to forecast accurately;

Economic weakness or a slow-down in economic activity could lead to a reduction in the number of claims we process;

We may be unable to develop further efficiencies in our claims-handling business and may be unable to obtain or retain certain customers if we fail to make adequate improvements in technology or operations; and

Insurance companies or certain large self-insured entities may create in-house servicing capabilities that compete with our services.

If any of that period, which can adversely affectthese risks materialize, our ability to forecast these revenues and therefore budget for significant future expenditures. Quarterly and annual fluctuations in revenues based upon increases and decreases associated with the timing of policy renewals may adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Profit-sharing contingent commissions are special revenue-sharing commissions paid by insurance companies based upon the profitability, volume and/or growthfinancial condition could be adversely affected.

14


Table of the business placed with such companies during the prior year. These commissions generally have been in the range of 3.0% to 5.0% ofContents

IF WE FAIL TO COMPLY WITH THE COVENANTS CONTAINED IN CERTAIN OF OUR AGREEMENTS, OUR LIQUIDITY, RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION MAY BE ADVERSELY AFFECTED.

The credit agreements that govern our previous year’s total core commissionsdebt contain various covenants and fees over the last three years. Due to, among other things, potentially poor macroeconomic conditions, the inherent uncertainty of loss in our industry and changes in underwriting criteria due in part to the high loss ratios experienced by insurance companies, we cannot predict the payment of these profit-sharing contingent commissions. Further, we have no control over the ability of insurance companies to estimate loss reserves, which affects our ability to make profit-sharing calculations. Override commissions are paid by insurance companies based upon the volume of business that we place with them and are generally paid over the course of the year. Because profit-sharing contingent commissions and override commissions materially affect our revenues, any decrease in their payment to us could adversely affect the results of our operations, profitability and our financial condition.

WE COULD INCUR SUBSTANTIAL LOSSES FROM OUR CASH AND INVESTMENT ACCOUNTS IF ONE OF THE FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS THAT WE USE FAILS OR IS TAKEN OVER BY THE U.S. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION (“FDIC”).
We maintain cash and investment balances, including restricted cash held in premium trust accounts, at various depository institutions in amounts that are significantly in excess of the limits insured by the FDIC. If one or more of the depository institutionslimitations with which we maintain significant cash balancesmust comply. At December 31, 2019, we believe we were to fail, our ability to access these funds might be temporarily or permanently limited,in compliance with the financial covenants and we could face material liquidity problems and potential material financial losses.

OUR BUSINESS PRACTICES AND COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS ARE SUBJECT TO UNCERTAINTY DUE TO POTENTIAL CHANGES IN REGULATIONS.
The business practices and compensation arrangements of the insurance intermediary industry, including our practices and arrangements, are subject to uncertainty due to investigations by various governmental authorities. Certain of our offices are parties to profit-sharing contingent commission agreements with certain insurance companies, including agreements providing for potential payment of revenue-sharing commissions by insurance companies based primarily on the overall profitability of the aggregate business written with those insurance companies and/or additional factors such as retention ratios and the overall volume of business that an office or offices place with those insurance companies. Additionally, to a lesser extent, some of our offices are parties to override commission agreements with certain insurance companies, which provide for commission rates in excess of standard commission rates to be applied to specific lines of business, such as group health business, and which are based primarily on the overall volume of business that such office or offices placed with those insurance companies. The legislatures of various states may adopt new laws addressing contingent commission arrangements, including laws prohibiting such arrangements, and addressing disclosure of such arrangements to insureds. Various state departments of insurance may also adopt new regulations addressing these matters which could adversely affect our results of operations.
WE COMPETE IN A HIGHLY-REGULATED INDUSTRY, WHICH MAY RESULT IN INCREASED EXPENSES OR RESTRICTIONS ON OUR OPERATIONS.
We conduct businessother limitations contained in each of the fifty states of the United States of America and are subjectthese agreements. However, failure to comprehensive regulation and supervision by government agencies in each of those states. The primary purpose of such regulation and supervision is to provide safeguards for policyholders rather than to protect the interestscomply with material provisions of our shareholders. As a result, such regulation and supervision could reduce our profitabilitycovenants in these agreements or growth by increasing compliance costs, restricting the productsother credit or services we may sell, the markets we may enter, the methods bysimilar agreements to which we may sell our products and services, or the prices we may charge for our services and the form of compensation we may accept from our customers, carriers and third parties. The laws of the various state jurisdictions establish supervisory agencies with broad administrative powers with respect to, among other things, licensing of entities to transact business, licensing of agents, admittance of assets, regulating premium rates, approving policy forms, regulating unfair trade and claims practices, establishing reserve requirements and solvency standards, requiring participation in guarantee funds and shared market mechanisms, and restricting payment of dividends. Also, in response to perceived excessive cost or inadequacy of available insurance, states have from time to time created state insurance funds and assigned risk pools, which compete directly, onbecome a subsidized basis, with private insurance providers. We act as agents and brokers for such state insurance funds and assigned risk pools in California and New York as well as certain other states. These state funds and poolsparty could choose to reduce the sales or brokerage commissions we receive. Any such reductions,result in a state in which we have substantialdefault, rendering them unavailable to us and causing a material adverse effect on our liquidity, results of operations and financial condition. In the event of certain defaults, the lenders thereunder would not be required to lend any additional amounts to or purchase any additional notes from us and could affectelect to declare all borrowings outstanding, together with accrued and unpaid interest and fees, to be due and payable. If the profitability ofindebtedness under these agreements or our operations in such state, or cause usother indebtedness, were to change our marketing focus. Further, state insurance regulators and the National Association of Insurance Commissioners continually re-examine existing laws and regulations, and such re-examination may result in the enactment of insurance-related laws and regulations, or the issuance of interpretations thereof, that adversely affect our business. Although we believe that we are in compliance in all material respects with applicable local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations,be accelerated, there can be no assurance that moreour assets would be sufficient to repay such indebtedness in full.

CERTAIN OF OUR AGREEMENTS CONTAIN VARIOUS COVENANTS THAT LIMIT THE DISCRETION OF OUR MANAGEMENT IN OPERATING OUR BUSINESS AND COULD PREVENT US FROM ENGAGING IN CERTAIN POTENTIALLY BENEFICIAL ACTIVITIES.

The restrictive laws, rules, regulations or interpretations thereof, will not be adoptedcovenants in the future thatour debt agreements may impact how we operate our business and prevent us from engaging in certain potentially beneficial activities. In particular, among other covenants, our debt agreements require us to maintain a minimum ratio of Consolidated EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization), adjusted for certain transaction-related items (“Consolidated EBITDA”), to consolidated interest expense and a maximum ratio of consolidated net indebtedness to Consolidated EBITDA. Our compliance with these covenants could make compliance more difficult or expensive. Specifically, recently adopted federal financial services modernization legislationlimit management’s discretion in operating our business and could lead to additional federal regulation of the insurance industryprevent us from engaging in the coming years, which could result in increased expenses or restrictions on our operations.

PROPOSED TORT REFORM LEGISLATION, IF ENACTED, COULD DECREASE DEMAND FOR LIABILITY INSURANCE, THEREBY REDUCING OUR COMMISSION REVENUES.
Legislation concerning tort reform has been considered, from time to time, in the United States Congress and in several state legislatures. Among the provisions considered in such legislation have been limitations on damage awards, including punitive damages, and various restrictions applicable to class action lawsuits. Enactment of these or similar provisions by Congress, or by states in which we sell insurance, could reduce the demand for liability insurance policies or lead to a decrease in policy limits of such policies sold, thereby reducing our commission revenues.
certain potentially beneficial activities.

THERE ARE INHERENT UNCERTAINTIES INVOLVED IN ESTIMATES, JUDGMENTS AND ASSUMPTIONS USED IN THE PREPARATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH U.S. GAAP. ANY CHANGES IN LAWSESTIMATES, JUDGMENTS AND REGULATIONS MAY INCREASE OUR COSTS.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended (“Sarbanes-Oxley”) and the Dodd-Frank Act enacted in 2010 have required changes in some of our corporate governance, securities disclosure and compliance practices. In response to the requirements of these Acts, the SEC and the New York Stock Exchange have promulgated and may continue to promulgate new rules on a variety of subjects. These developments have increased (and may increase in the future) our compliance costs, may make it more difficult and more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance and may make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified members of our Board of Directors or qualified executive officers.
From time to time new regulations are enacted, or existing requirements are changed, and it is difficult to anticipate how such regulations and changes will be implemented and enforced. We continue to evaluate the necessary steps for compliance with regulations as they are enacted. Legislative developments that could adversely affect us include: changes in our business compensation model as a result of regulatory developments (for example, the Affordable Care Act); and federal and state governments establishing programs to provide health insurance or,

in certain cases, property insurance in catastrophe-prone areas or other alternative market types of coverage, that compete with, or completely replace, insurance products offered by insurance carriers. Also, as climate change issues become more prevalent, the U.S. and foreign governments are beginning to respond to these issues. This increasing governmental focus on climate change may result in new environmental regulations that may negatively affect us and our customers. This could cause us to incur additional direct costs in complying with any new environmental regulations, as well as increased indirect costs resulting from our customers incurring additional compliance costs that get passed on to us. These costs may adversely impact our operations and financial condition.
WE ARE SUBJECT TO LITIGATION WHICH, IF DETERMINED UNFAVORABLY TO US,ASSUMPTIONS COULD HAVE A MATERIAL ADVERSE EFFECT ON OUR BUSINESS,FINANCIAL POSITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OR FINANCIAL CONDITION.
WeAND THEREFORE OUR BUSINESS.

The annual Consolidated Financial Statements and Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in the periodic reports we file with the SEC are prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP involves making estimates, judgments and may beassumptions that affect reported amounts of assets (including intangible assets), liabilities and related reserves, revenues, expenses and income. Estimates, judgments and assumptions are inherently subject to a number of claims, regulatory actions and other proceedings that arisechange in the ordinary coursefuture, and any such changes could result in corresponding changes to the amounts of business. We cannot,assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and likely will not be able to, predict the outcome of these claims, actionsincome, and proceedings with certainty.

An adverse outcome in connection with one or more of these matters could have a material adverse effect on our business,financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

IMPROPER DISCLOSURE OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION COULD NEGATIVELY IMPACT OUR BUSINESS.

We are responsible for maintaining the security and privacy of our customers’ confidential and proprietary information and the personal data of their employees. We have put in place policies, procedures and technological safeguards designed to protect the security and privacy of this information; however, we cannot guarantee that this information will not be improperly disclosed or financial condition in any given quarterly or annual period. In addition, regardlessaccessed. Disclosure of monetary costs, these mattersthis information could have a material adverse effect onharm our reputation and cause harmsubject us to liability under our carrier, customercontracts and laws that protect personal data, resulting in increased costs or employee relationships,loss of revenues.

DUE TO INHERENT LIMITATIONS, THERE CAN BE NO ASSURANCE THAT OUR SYSTEM OF DISCLOSURE AND INTERNAL CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES WILL BE SUCCESSFUL IN PREVENTING ALL ERRORS OR FRAUD, OR IN INFORMING MANAGEMENT OF ALL MATERIAL INFORMATION IN A TIMELY MANNER.

Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and internal controls and procedures will prevent all error and fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived, operated and tested, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system reflects that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur simply because of error or divert personnelmistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of a control.

The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and management resources.

While we currently have insurance coverage for somethere can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, a control may become inadequate because of these potential liabilities, other potential liabilitieschanges in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and may not be covered by insurance, insurers may dispute coverage or the amountdetected.

15


Table of our insurance may not be enough to cover the damages awarded. In addition, some types of damages, like punitive damages, may not be covered by insurance. Insurance coverage for all or some forms of liability may become unavailable or prohibitively expensive in the future.

Contents

OUR BUSINESS, RESULTS OF OPERATIONS, FINANCIAL CONDITION ORAND LIQUIDITY MAY BE MATERIALLY ADVERSELY AFFECTED BY ERRORS AND OMISSIONS AND THE OUTCOME OF CERTAIN ACTUAL AND POTENTIAL CLAIMS, LAWSUITSREGULATORY ACTIONS AND PROCEEDINGS.

We are subject to various actual and potential claims, lawsuitsregulatory actions and other proceedings including those relating principally to alleged errors and omissions in connection with the placement or servicing of insurance and/or the provision of services in the ordinary course of business.business, of which we cannot, and likely will not be able to, predict the outcome with certainty. Because we often assist customers with matters involving substantial amounts of money, including the placement of insurance and the handling of related claims that customers may assert, errors and omissions claims against us may arise alleging potential liability for all or part of the amounts in question. Also, the failure of an insurer with whom we place business could result in errors and omissions claims against us by our customers, which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. Claimants may seek large damage awards, and these claims may involve potentially significant legal costs, including punitive damages. Such claims, lawsuits and other proceedings could, for example, include claims for damages based upon allegations that our employees or sub-agents failed to procure coverage, report claims on behalf of customers, provide insurance companies with complete and accurate information relating to the risks being insured or appropriately apply funds that we hold for our customers on a fiduciary basis. In addition, given the long-tail nature of professional liability claims, errors and omissions matters can relate to matters dating back many years. Where appropriate, we have established provisions against these potential matters that we believe to be adequate in the light of current information and legal advice, and we adjust such provisions from time to time according to developments.

While most of the errors and omissions claims made against us (subject to our self-insured deductibles) have been covered by our professional indemnity insurance, our business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity may be adversely affected if, in the future, our insurance coverage proves to be inadequate or unavailable, or if there is an increase in liabilities for which we self-insure. Our ability to obtain professional indemnity insurance in the amounts and with the deductibles we desire in the future may be adversely impacted by general developments in the market for such insurance or our own claims experience. In addition, claims, lawsuits and other proceedings may harmregardless of monetary costs, these matters could have a material adverse effect on our reputation and cause harm to our carrier, customer or employee relationships, or divert personnel and management resources away from operating our business.

resources.

OUR BUSINESS, AND THEREFORE OUR RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION, MAY BE ADVERSELY AFFECTED BY FURTHER CHANGES IN THE U.S.-BASED CREDIT MARKETS.

Although we are not currently experiencing any limitation of access to our revolving credit facility (which matures in 2019)2022) and are not aware of any issues impacting the ability or willingness of our lenders under such facility to honor their commitments to extend us credit, the failure of a lender could adversely affect our ability to borrow on that facility, which over time could negatively impact our ability to consummate significant acquisitions or make other significant capital expenditures. Tightening conditions in the credit markets in future years could adversely affect the availability and terms of future borrowings or renewals or refinancing.

We also have a significant amount of trade accounts receivable from some insurance companies with which we place insurance. If those insurance companies were to experience liquidity problems or other financial difficulties, we could encounter delays or defaults in payments owed to us, which could have a significant adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations.


IF WE FAIL TO COMPLY WITH THE COVENANTS CONTAINED IN

CERTAIN OF OUR AGREEMENTS, OUR LIQUIDITY, RESULTSEXISTING SHAREHOLDERS HAVE SIGNIFICANT CONTROL OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION MAY BE ADVERSELY AFFECTED.

The credit agreements that govern our debt contain various covenants and other limitations with which we must comply. THE COMPANY.

At December 31, 2016, we believe we were in compliance with the financial covenants2019, our executive officers, directors and other limitations contained in eachcertain of these agreements. However, failure to comply with material provisionstheir family members collectively beneficially owned approximately 16.7% of our covenants in these agreements or other credit or similar agreements tooutstanding common stock, of which we may becomeJ. Hyatt Brown, our Chairman, and his son, J. Powell Brown, our President and Chief Executive Officer, beneficially owned approximately 15.7%. As a party could result, in a default, rendering them unavailable to usour executive officers, directors and causing a material adverse effect on our liquidity, resultscertain of operations and financial condition. Intheir family members have significant influence over (1) the event of certain defaults, the lenders thereunder would not be required to lend any additional amounts to or purchase any additional notes from us and could elect to declare all borrowings outstanding, together with accrued and unpaid interest and fees, to be due and payable. If the indebtedness under these agreements or our other indebtedness, were to be accelerated, there can be no assurance that our assets would be sufficient to repay such indebtedness in full.

CERTAIN OF OUR AGREEMENTS CONTAIN VARIOUS COVENANTS THAT LIMIT THE DISCRETION OF OUR MANAGEMENT IN OPERATING OUR BUSINESS AND COULD PREVENT US FROM ENGAGING IN CERTAIN POTENTIALLY BENEFICIAL ACTIVITIES.
The restrictive covenants in our debt agreements may impact how we operate our business and prevent us from engaging in certain potentially beneficial activities. In particular, among other covenants, our debt agreements require us to maintain a minimum ratio of Consolidated EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization), adjusted for certain transaction-related items (“Consolidated EBITDA”), to consolidated interest expense and a maximum ratio of consolidated net indebtedness to Consolidated EBITDA. Our compliance with these covenants could limit management’s discretion in operating our business and could prevent us from engaging in certain potentially beneficial activities.
OUR CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
Our credit ratings are an assessment by rating agencieselection of our ability to pay our debts when due. Consequently, realBoard of Directors, (2) the approval or anticipated changes in our credit ratings will generally affect the market value of our securities. Agency ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security, and may be revised or withdrawn at any time by the issuing agency. Each agency’s rating should be evaluated independentlydisapproval of any other agency’s rating.
matters requiring shareholder approval and (3) our affairs and policies.

WE HAVE OPERATIONS INTERNATIONALLY, WHICH MAY RESULT IN A NUMBER OF ADDITIONAL RISKS AND REQUIRE MORE MANAGEMENT TIME AND EXPENSE THAN OUR DOMESTIC OPERATIONS TO ACHIEVE OR MAINTAIN PROFITABILITY.

We have operations in the United Kingdom, Bermuda, Canada and the Cayman Islands. In the future, we intend to continue to consider additional international expansion opportunities. Our international operations may be subject to a number of risks, including:

Difficulties in staffing and managing foreign operations;

Difficulties in staffing and managing foreign operations;

Less flexible employee relationships, which may make it difficult and expensive to terminate employees and which limits our ability to prohibit employees from competing with us after their employment ceases;

Less flexible employee relationships, which may make it difficult and expensive to terminate employees and which limits our ability to prohibit employees from competing with us after their employment ceases;

Political and economic instability (including acts of terrorism and outbreaks of war);

Political and economic instability (including acts

Coordinating our communications and logistics across geographic distances and multiple time zones;

Unexpected changes in regulatory requirements and laws;

16


Table of terrorism and outbreaks of war);

Contents

Coordinating our communications and logistics across geographic distances and multiple time zones;
Unexpected changes in regulatory requirements and laws;

Adverse trade policies, and adverse changes to any of the policies of either the U.S. or any of the foreign jurisdictions in which we operate;

Adverse changes in tax rates;

Variations in foreign currency exchange rates;

Legal or political constraints on our ability to maintain or increase prices;

Governmental restrictions on the transfer of funds to or from us, including to or from our operations outside the United States;

Any adverse developments arising out of the exit of the United Kingdom from the European Union, including any related economic downturn in the United Kingdom and any sustained weakness in the British pound’s exchange rate against the U.S. dollar resulting from such exit;

Burdens of complying with, and the risk of employees or third parties acting on our behalf violating, anti-corruption laws in foreign countries; and

Burdens of complying with a wide variety of labor practices and foreign laws, including those relating to export and import duties, environmental policies and privacy issues.

WE ARE SUBJECT TO RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH THE CURRENT INTEREST RATE ENVIRONMENT AND TO THE EXTENT WE USE DEBT TO FINANCE OUR INVESTMENTS, CHANGES IN INTEREST RATES WILL AFFECT OUR COST OF CAPITAL AND NET INVESTMENT INCOME.

As of July 2017, the UK Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”) has urged banks and institutions to discontinue their use of the policiesLondon Interbank Overnight Rate (“LIBOR”) benchmark rate for floating rate debt, and other financial instruments tied to the rate after 2021. To help with the transition, the Federal Reserve Board and New York Fed have commissioned the Alternative Reference Rates Committee (“ARRC”), comprised of eithera diverse set of private-sector entities that have an important presence in markets affected by USD LIBOR and a wide array of official-sector entities, including banking and financial sector regulators, as ex-officio members. The ARRC have recommended the U.S. orSecured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) as the best alternative rate to LIBOR post discontinuance and has proposed a transition plan and timeline designed to encourage the adoption of SOFR from LIBOR.

As of December 31, 2019, the Company’s primary exposure are debt instruments referencing LIBOR-based rates which includes the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Amended and Restated Credit Agreement”) term loan balance of $330.0 million and $100.0 million on the revolving credit facility outstanding and matures in June 2022, as well as the term loan credit agreement (the “Term Loan Credit Agreement”) which had an outstanding balance of $285.0 million and matures in December 2023. As such, any potential effect of the foreign jurisdictions in which we operate;

Adverse changes in tax rates;
Variations in foreign currency exchange rates;
Legal or political constraintsany such event on our abilitycost of capital, interest rate exposure and net investment income cannot yet be determined. In addition, any further changes or reforms to maintainthe determination or supervision of LIBOR may result in a sudden or prolonged increase prices;
Governmental restrictionsor decrease in reported LIBOR, which could have an adverse impact on the transfermarket value for or value of fundsany LIBOR-linked securities, loans, and other financial obligations or extensions of credit held by or due to us and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The Company is currently evaluating the transition from our operations outsideLIBOR as an interest rate benchmark to other potential alternative reference rates, including but not limited to the United States;SOFR interest rate. Management will continue to actively asses the related opportunities and

Burdens risks associated with the transition and monitor related proposals and guidance published by ARRC and other alternative-rate initiatives, with an expectation the we will be prepared to for a termination of complying with a wide variety of labor practices and foreign laws, including those relatingLIBOR benchmarks after 2021.

Risks Related to export and import duties, environmental policies and privacy issues.

Our Industry

OUR INABILITY TO RETAIN OR HIRE QUALIFIED EMPLOYEES,CURRENT MARKET SHARE MAY DECREASE AS A RESULT OF DISINTERMEDIATION WITHIN THE INSURANCE INDUSTRY, INCLUDING INCREASED COMPETITION FROM INSURANCE COMPANIES, TECHNOLOGY COMPANIES AND THE FINANCIAL SERVICES INDUSTRY, AS WELL AS THE LOSS OF ANY OFSHIFT AWAY FROM TRADITIONAL INSURANCE MARKETS.

The insurance intermediary business is highly competitive and we actively compete with numerous firms for customers and insurance companies, many of which have relationships with insurance companies or have a significant presence in niche insurance markets that may give them an advantage over us. Other competitive concerns may include the quality of our products and services, our pricing and the ability of some of our customers to self-insure and the entrance of technology companies into the insurance intermediary business. A number of insurance companies are engaged in the direct sale of insurance, primarily to individuals, and do not pay commissions to agents and brokers. In addition, and to the extent that banks, securities firms, private equity funds, and insurance companies affiliate, the financial services industry may experience further consolidation, and we therefore may experience increased competition from insurance companies and the financial services industry, as a growing number of larger financial institutions increasingly, and aggressively, offer a wider variety of financial services, including insurance intermediary services.

In addition, there has been an increase in alternative insurance markets, such as self-insurance, captives, risk retention groups and non-insurance capital markets. While we collaborate and compete in these segments on a fee-for-service basis, we cannot be certain that such alternative markets will provide the same level of insurance coverage or profitability as traditional insurance markets.

17


Table of Contents

CURRENT U.S. OR GLOBAL ECONOMIC CONDITIONS MAY ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, COULD NEGATIVELY IMPACT BUSINESS.

If economic conditions were to worsen, a number of negative effects on our business could result, including declines in insurable exposure units, declines in insurance premium rates, the financial insolvency of insurance companies, or the reduced ability of customers to pay. Also, if general economic conditions are poor, some of our customers may cease operations completely or be acquired by other companies, which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. If these customers are affected by poor economic conditions, but yet remain in existence, they may face liquidity problems or other financial difficulties that could result in delays or defaults in payments owed to us, which could have a significant adverse impact on our consolidated financial condition and results of operations. Any of these effects could decrease our net revenues and profitability.

OUR ABILITY TO RETAIN EXISTING BUSINESS, AND GENERATE NEW BUSINESS.

THEREFORE OUR RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION, MAY BE ADVERSELY AFFECTED BY CONDITIONS THAT RESULT IN REDUCED INSURER CAPACITY.

Our successresults of operations depend on the continued capacity of insurance carriers to underwrite risk and provide coverage, which depends in turn on ourthose insurance companies’ ability to attractprocure reinsurance. Capacity could also be reduced by insurance companies failing or withdrawing from writing certain coverages that we offer to our customers. We have no control over these matters. To the extent that reinsurance becomes less widely available or significantly more expensive, we may not be able to procure the amount or types of coverage that our customers desire and retain skilled and experienced personnel. There is significant competition from within the insurance industry and from businesses outside the industry for exceptional employees, especially in key positions. Ifcoverage we are not able to successfully attract, retainprocure for our customers may be more expensive or limited.

QUARTERLY AND ANNUAL VARIATIONS IN OUR COMMISSIONS THAT RESULT FROM THE TIMING OF POLICY RENEWALS AND THE NET EFFECT OF NEW AND LOST BUSINESS PRODUCTION MAY HAVE UNEXPECTED EFFECTS ON OUR RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

Our commission income (including profit-sharing contingent commissions and motivate our employees, ouroverride commissions) can vary quarterly or annually due to the timing of policy renewals and the net effect of new and lost business financial resultsproduction. We do not control the factors that cause these variations. Specifically, customers’ demand for insurance products can influence the timing of renewals, new business and reputation could be materiallylost business (which includes policies that are not renewed), and adversely affected.


Losing employees who managecancellations. In addition, we rely on insurance companies for the payment of certain commissions. Because these payments are processed internally by these insurance companies, we may not receive a payment that is otherwise expected from a particular insurance company in a particular quarter or support substantial customer relationships or possess substantial experience or expertise couldyear until after the end of that period, which can adversely affect our ability to secureforecast these revenues and complete customer engagements,therefore budget for significant future expenditures. Quarterly and annual fluctuations in revenues based upon increases and decreases associated with the timing of new business, policy renewals and payments from insurance companies may adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Profit-sharing contingent commissions are special revenue-sharing commissions paid by insurance companies based upon the profitability, volume and/or growth of the business placed with such companies generally during the prior year. Over the last three years these commissions generally have been in the range of 3.0% to 3.5% of our previous year’s total core commissions and fees. Due to, among other things, potentially poor macroeconomic conditions, the inherent uncertainty of loss in our industry and changes in underwriting criteria due in part to the high loss ratios experienced by insurance companies, we cannot predict the payment of these profit-sharing contingent commissions. Further, we have no control over the ability of insurance companies to estimate loss reserves, which wouldaffects our ability to make profit-sharing calculations. Override commissions are paid by insurance companies based upon the volume of business that we place with them and are generally paid over the course of the year. Any decrease in their payment to us could adversely affect our results of operations. Also, if anyoperations, profitability and our financial condition.

WE COULD INCUR SUBSTANTIAL LOSSES FROM OUR CASH AND INVESTMENT ACCOUNTS IF ONE OF THE FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS THAT WE USE FAILS OR IS TAKEN OVER BY THE U.S. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION (“FDIC”).

We maintain cash and investment balances, including restricted cash held in premium trust accounts, at numerous depository institutions in amounts that are significantly in excess of the limits insured by the FDIC. If one or more of the depository institutions with which we maintain significant cash balances were to fail or be taken over by the FDIC, our ability to access these funds might be temporarily or permanently limited, and we could face material liquidity problems and potential material financial losses.

OUR BUSINESS PRACTICES AND COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS ARE SUBJECT TO UNCERTAINTY DUE TO POTENTIAL CHANGES IN REGULATIONS.

The business practices and compensation arrangements of the insurance intermediary industry, including our practices and arrangements, are subject to uncertainty due to investigations by various governmental authorities. Certain of our key professionals wereoffices are parties to joinprofit-sharing contingent commission agreements with certain insurance companies, including agreements providing for potential payment of revenue-sharing commissions by insurance companies based primarily on the overall profitability of the aggregate business written with those insurance companies and/or additional factors such as retention ratios and the overall volume of business that an existing competitoroffice or formoffices place with those insurance companies. Additionally, to a competing company,lesser extent, some of our offices are parties to override commission agreements with certain insurance companies, which provide for commission rates in excess of standard commission rates to be applied to specific lines of business, such as group health business, and which are based primarily on the overall volume of business that such office or offices placed with those insurance companies. The legislatures of various states may adopt new laws addressing contingent commission arrangements, including laws prohibiting such

18


Table of Contents

arrangements, and addressing disclosure of such arrangements to insureds. Various state departments of insurance may also adopt new regulations addressing these matters which could adversely affect our results of operations.

WE COMPETE IN A HIGHLY-REGULATED INDUSTRY, WHICH MAY RESULT IN INCREASED EXPENSES OR RESTRICTIONS ON OUR OPERATIONS.

We conduct business in each of the fifty states of the United States of America and are subject to comprehensive regulation and supervision by government agencies in each of those states. The primary purpose of such regulation and supervision is to provide safeguards for policyholders rather than to protect the interests of our shareholders, and it is difficult to anticipate how changes in such regulation would be implemented and enforced. As a result, such regulation and supervision could reduce our profitability or growth by increasing compliance costs, technology compliance, restricting the products or services we may sell, the markets we may enter, the methods by which we may sell our products and services, or the prices we may charge for our services and the form of compensation we may accept from our customers, carriers and third parties. The laws of the various state jurisdictions establish supervisory agencies with broad administrative powers with respect to, among other things, licensing of entities to transact business, licensing of agents, admittance of assets, regulating premium rates, approving policy forms, regulating unfair trade and claims practices, determining technology and data protection requirements, establishing reserve requirements and solvency standards, requiring participation in guarantee funds and shared market mechanisms, and restricting payment of dividends. Also, in response to perceived excessive cost or inadequacy of available insurance, states have from time to time created state insurance funds and assigned risk pools, which compete directly, on a subsidized basis, with private insurance providers. We act as agents and brokers for such state insurance funds and assigned risk pools in California and New York as well as certain other states. These state funds and pools could choose to usereduce the services of that competitor insteadsales or brokerage commissions we receive. Any such reductions, in a state in which we have substantial operations could affect the profitability of our services. Whileoperations in such state, or cause us to change our key personnel are prohibited by contract from soliciting our employeesmarketing focus. Further, state insurance regulators and customers for a periodthe National Association of years following separation from employment with us, they are not prohibited from competing with us.

In addition, we could be adversely affected if we fail to adequately plan forInsurance Commissioners continually re-examine existing laws and regulations, and such re-examination may result in the successionenactment of our senior leadersinsurance-related laws and key executives. While we have succession plans in place and we have employment arrangements with certain key executives, these do not guaranteeregulations, or the issuance of interpretations thereof, that the services of these executives will continue to be available to us. Although we operate with a decentralized management system, the loss of our senior managers or other key personnel, or our inability to continue to identify, recruit and retain such personnel, could materially and adversely affect our business. Certain federal financial services modernization legislation could lead to additional federal regulation of the insurance industry in the coming years, which could result in increased expenses or restrictions on our operations. Other legislative developments that could adversely affect us include: changes in our business operatingcompensation model as a result of regulatory developments (for example, the Affordable Care Act); and federal and state governments establishing programs to provide health insurance or, in certain cases, property insurance in catastrophe-prone areas or other alternative market types of coverage, that compete with, or completely replace, insurance products offered by insurance carriers. Also, as climate change issues become more prevalent, the U.S. and foreign governments are beginning to respond to these issues. This increasing governmental focus on climate change may result in new environmental regulations that may negatively affect us and our customers. This could cause us to incur additional direct costs in complying with any new environmental regulations, as well as increased indirect costs resulting from our customers incurring additional compliance costs that get passed on to us. These costs may adversely impact our results of operations and financial condition.

Although we believe that we are in compliance in all material respects with applicable local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations, there can be no assurance that more restrictive laws, rules, regulations or interpretations thereof, will not be adopted in the future that could make compliance more difficult or expensive.

WE ARE EXPOSED TO INTANGIBLE ASSET RISK; SPECIFICALLY, OUR GOODWILL MAY BECOME IMPAIRED IN THE FUTURE.

As of the date of the filing of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the 20162019 fiscal year, we have $2,675.4$3,746.1 million of goodwill recorded on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.Sheets. We perform a goodwill impairment test on an annual basis and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of our goodwill may not be recoverable from estimated future cash flows. We completed our most recent evaluation of impairment for goodwill as of November 30, 20162019 and determined that the fair value of goodwill exceeded the carrying value of such assets. A significant and sustained decline in our stock price and market capitalization, a significant decline in our expected future cash flows, a significant adverse change in the business climate or slower growth rates could result in the need to perform an additional impairment analysis prior to the next annual goodwill impairment test. If we were to conclude that a future write-down of our goodwill is necessary, we would then record the appropriate charge, which could result in material charges that are adverse to our operating results and financial position. See Note 1-“Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” and Note 3-4-“Goodwill” to the Consolidated Financial Statements and “Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.”

19


Table of Contents

Additionally, the carrying value of amortizable intangible assets attributable to each business or asset group comprising the Company is periodically reviewed by management to determine if there are events or changes in circumstances that would indicate that its carrying amount may not be recoverable. Accordingly, if there are any such circumstances that occur during the year, we assess the carrying value of our amortizable intangible assets by considering the estimated future undiscounted cash flows generated by the corresponding business or asset group. Any impairment identified through this assessment may require that the carrying value of related amortizable intangible assets be adjusted; however, no impairments have been recorded for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014.

CURRENT U.S. ECONOMIC CONDITIONS AND THE SHIFT AWAY FROM TRADITIONAL2017.

PROPOSED TORT REFORM LEGISLATION, IF ENACTED, COULD DECREASE DEMAND FOR LIABILITY INSURANCE, MARKETS MAY CONTINUE TO ADVERSELY AFFECTTHEREBY REDUCING OUR BUSINESS.

If economic conditions wereCOMMISSION REVENUES.

Legislation concerning tort reform has been considered, from time to worsen, a number of negative effectstime, in the United States Congress and in several state legislatures. Among the provisions considered in such legislation have been limitations on our business could result,damage awards, including declines in values of insurable exposure units, declines in insurance premium rates,punitive damages, and the financial insolvency of insurance companies, or reduced abilityvarious restrictions applicable to pay, of certain of our customers. Also, if general economic conditions are poor, some of our customers may cease operations completely or be acquired by other companies, which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. If these customers are affected by poor economic conditions but yet remain in existence, they may face liquidity problems or other financial difficulties which could result in delays or defaults in payments owed to us, which could have a significant adverse impact on our consolidated financial condition and results of operations. Anyclass action lawsuits. Enactment of these effectsor similar provisions by Congress, or by states in which we sell insurance, could reduce the demand for liability insurance policies or lead to a decrease in policy limits of such policies sold, thereby reducing our net revenues and profitability.

In addition, there has beencommission revenues.

Risks Related to Investing in our Securities

OUR CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE.

Our credit ratings are an increase in alternative insurance markets, such as self-insurance, captives, risk retention groups and non-insurance capital markets. While we compete in these segments on a fee-for-service basis, we cannot be certain that such alternative markets will provide the same level of insurance coverage or profitability as traditional insurance markets.

THERE ARE INHERENT UNCERTAINTIES INVOLVED IN ESTIMATES, JUDGMENTS AND ASSUMPTIONS USED IN THE PREPARATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH U.S. GAAP. ANY CHANGES IN ESTIMATES, JUDGMENTS AND ASSUMPTIONS COULD HAVE A MATERIAL ADVERSE EFFECT ON OUR BUSINESS, FINANCIAL POSITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
The annual Consolidated Financial Statements and Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in the periodic reports we file with the SEC are prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP involves making estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect reported amounts of assets (including intangible assets), liabilities and related reserves, revenues, expenses and income. Estimates, judgments and assumptions are inherently subject to change in the future, and any such changes could result in corresponding changes to the amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and income, and could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

RAPID TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE IN OUR INDUSTRY MAY REQUIRE ADDITIONAL RESOURCES AND TIME TO ADEQUATELY RESPOND TO DYNAMICS, WHICH MAY ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR BUSINESS AND OPERATING RESULTS.
Frequent technological changes, new products and services and evolving industry standards are influencing the insurance business. The Internet, for example, is increasingly used to securely transmit benefits and related information to customers and to facilitate business-to-business information exchange and transactions. We believe that the development and implementation of new technologies may require us to make additional investments in the future. We are currently underway with a multi-year plan to upgrade much of our technology platforms and anticipate investing $30 million to $40 million, which will have an impact on our margins during this period. We have not determined, however, if additional resources and time for development and implementation may be required, which if required, may result in short-term, unexpected interruptions or impacts to our business, or may result in a competitive disadvantage in price and/or efficiency, as we develop or implement new technologies.
OUR ABILITY TO CONDUCT BUSINESS WOULD BE NEGATIVELY IMPACTED IN THE EVENT OF AN INTERRUPTION IN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND/OR DATA SECURITY AND/OR OUTSOURCING RELATIONSHIPS.
Our business relies on information systems to provide effective and efficient service to our customers, process claims, and timely and accurately report information to carriers. An interruption of our access to, or an inability to access, our information technology, telecommunications or other systems could significantly impair our ability to perform such functions on a timely basis. If sustained or repeated, such a business interruption, system failure or service denial could result in a deteriorationassessment by rating agencies of our ability to write and process new and renewal business, provide customer service, pay claimsour debts when due. Consequently, real or anticipated changes in our credit ratings will generally affect the market value of our securities. Agency ratings are not a timely mannerrecommendation to buy, sell or perform other necessary business functions.
Computer viruses, hackers and other external hazards could expose our data systems to security breaches. These increased risks, and expanding regulatory requirements regarding data security, could expose us to data loss, monetary and reputational damages and significant increases in compliance costs. While we have taken, and continue to take, actions to protect thehold any security, and privacy of our information, entirely eliminating all risk of improper access to private information is not possible.
We are continuously taking steps to upgrade and expand our information systems capabilities. Maintaining, protecting and enhancing these capabilities to keep pace with evolving industry and regulatory standards, and changing customer preferences, requires an ongoing commitment of significant resources. If the information we rely upon to run our businesses was found to be inaccurate or unreliable or if we fail to maintain effectively our information systems and data integrity, we could experience operational disruptions, regulatory or other legal problems, increases in operating expenses, loss of existing customers, difficulty in attracting new customers, or suffer other adverse consequences.
Our technological development projects may not deliver the benefits we expect once they are completed, or may be replacedrevised or become obsolete more quickly than expected, which could result inwithdrawn at any time by the accelerated recognition of expenses. If we do not effectively and efficiently manage and upgrade our technology portfolio, or if the costs of doing so are higher than we expect, our ability to provide competitive services to new and existing customers in a cost-effective manner and our ability to implement our strategic initiatives couldissuing agency. Each agency’s rating should be adversely impacted.
IMPROPER DISCLOSURE OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION COULD NEGATIVELY IMPACT OUR BUSINESS.
We are responsible for maintaining the security and privacy of our customers’ confidential and proprietary information and the personal data of their employees. We have put in place policies, procedures and technological safeguards designed to protect the security and privacy of this information, however, we cannot guarantee that this information will not be improperly disclosed or accessed. Disclosure of this information could harm our reputation and subject us to liability under our contracts and laws that protect personal data, resulting in increased costs or loss of revenues.
Further, privacy laws and regulations are continuously changing and often are inconsistent among the states in which we operate. Our failure to adhere to or successfully implement procedures to respond to these requirements could result in legal liability or impairment to our reputation.
CERTAIN OF OUR EXISTING SHAREHOLDERS HAVE SIGNIFICANT CONTROL OF THE COMPANY.
At December 31, 2016, our executive officers, directors and certain of their family members collectively beneficially owned approximately 16.0% of our outstanding common stock, of which J. Hyatt Brown, our Chairman, and his son, J. Powell Brown, our President and Chief Executive Officer, beneficially owned approximately 15.1%. As a result, our executive officers, directors and certain of their family members have significant influence over (1) the election of our Board of Directors, (2) the approval or disapprovalevaluated independently of any other matters requiring shareholder approval and (3) our affairs and policies.

DUE TO INHERENT LIMITATIONS, THERE CAN BE NO ASSURANCE THAT OUR SYSTEM OF DISCLOSURE AND INTERNAL CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES WILL BE SUCCESSFUL IN PREVENTING ALL ERRORS OR FRAUD, OR IN INFORMING MANAGEMENT OF ALL MATERIAL INFORMATION IN A TIMELY MANNER.
Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and internal controls and procedures will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived, operated and tested, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system reflects that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur simply because of error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of a control.
The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, a control may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and may not be detected.
agency’s rating.

WE MAY EXPERIENCE VOLATILITY IN OUR STOCK PRICE THAT COULD AFFECT YOUR INVESTMENT.

The market price of our common stock may be subject to significant fluctuations in response to various factors, including: quarterly fluctuations in our operating results; changes in securities analysts’ estimates of our future earnings; changes in securities analysts’ predictions regarding the short-term and long-term future of our industry; changes to the tax code; and our loss of significant customers or significant business developments relating to us or our competitors. Our common stock’s market price also may be affected by our ability to meet stock analysts’ earnings and other expectations. Any failure to meet such expectations, even if minor, could cause the market price of our common stock to decline. In addition, stock markets have generally experienced a high level of price and volume volatility, and the market prices of equity securities of many listed companies have experienced wide price fluctuations not necessarily related to the operating performance of such companies. These broad market fluctuations may adversely affect our common stock’s market price. In the past, securities class action lawsuits frequently have been instituted against companies following periods of volatility in the market price of such companies’ securities. If any such litigation is initiated against us, it could result in substantial costs and a diversion of management’s attention and resources, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

ITEM 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.

None.

ITEM 2. Properties.

We lease our executive offices, which are located at 220 South Ridgewood Avenue, Daytona Beach, Florida 32114. We lease offices at each of our 241311 locations. We own an airplane hangar in Daytona Beach, Florida, which sits upon land leased from Volusia County, Florida. There are no outstanding mortgages on this owned property. Our operating leases expire on various dates. These leasesdates and generally contain renewal options and rent escalation clauses based upon increases in the lessors’ operating expenses and other charges. We expect that most leases will be renewed or replaced upon expiration. We own several contiguous parcels of land totaling over thirteen acres in Daytona Beach, Florida, located approximately a mile from our current executive offices, on which we have initiated a project to build a new office tower to hold our executive offices and certain other business operations with capacity for up to 1,000 employees and room for additional expansion through construction of additional office space at this location. We believe that our facilities are suitable and adequate for present purposes, and that the productive capacity in such facilities is substantially being utilized. From time to time, we may have unused space and seek to sublet such space to third parties, depending on the demand for office space in the locations involved. In the future, we may need to purchase, build or lease additional facilities to meet the requirements projected in our long-term business plan. See Note 1315 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on our lease commitments.

We are subject to numerous litigation claims that arise in the ordinary course of business. We do not believe any of these are, or are likely to become, material to our business.

20


Table of Contents

ITEM 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.


ITEM 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the symbol “BRO.” The table below sets forth, for the quarterly periods indicated, the intra-day high and low sales prices for our common stock as reported on the NYSE Composite Tape, and the cash dividends declared on our common stock.

 High Low 
Cash
Dividends
Per
Common
Share
2015     
First Quarter$33.34 $30.47 $0.11
Second Quarter$33.81 $31.50 $0.11
Third Quarter$34.59 $29.67 $0.11
Fourth Quarter$33.09 $30.39 $0.12
2016     
First Quarter$35.91 $28.41 $0.12
Second Quarter$37.49 $34.23 $0.12
Third Quarter$38.11 $35.81 $0.12
Fourth Quarter$45.62 $36.05 $0.14

On February 23, 2017,20, 2020, there were 139,986,178281,552,678 shares of our common stock outstanding, held by approximately 1,2181,390 shareholders of record.

We intend to continue to pay quarterly dividends, subject to continued capital availability and determination by our Board of Directors that cash dividends continue to be in the best interests of our shareholders. Our dividend policy may be affected by, among other items, our views on potential future capital requirements, including those relating to the creation and expansion of sales distribution channels and investments and acquisitions, legal risks, stock repurchase programs and challenges to our business model.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table sets forth information as of December 31, 2016, with respect to compensation plans under which the Company’s equity securities are authorized for issuance:
Plan Category
Number of securities
to be issued upon
exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants
and rights(a)(1)
 
Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding
options,
warrants and
rights(b)(2)
 
Number of securities
remaining available
for future issuance
under equity
compensation plans
(excluding securities
reflected
in column (a))(c)(3)
 
Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders: 
  
  
 
Brown & Brown, Inc. 2000 Incentive Stock Option Plan175,000
 $18.48
 
 
Brown & Brown, Inc. 2010 Stock Incentive PlanN/A
 N/A
 3,729,566
(4) 
Brown & Brown, Inc. 1990 Employee Stock Purchase PlanN/A
 N/A
 4,680,263
 
Brown & Brown, Inc. Performance Stock PlanN/A
 N/A
 
 
Total175,000
 $18.48
 8,409,829
 
Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders
 
 
 
(1)In addition to the number of securities listed in this column, 3,404,569 shares are issuable upon the vesting of restricted stock granted under the Brown & Brown, Inc. Performance Stock Plan and the Brown & Brown, Inc. 2010 Stock Incentive Plan, which represents the maximum number of shares that can vest based upon the achievement of certain performance criteria.

(2)The weighted-average exercise price excludes outstanding restricted stock as there is no exercise price associated with these equity awards.
(3)All of the shares available for future issuance under the Brown & Brown, Inc. 2000 Incentive Stock Option Plan, the Brown & Brown, Inc. Performance Stock Plan, and the Brown & Brown, Inc. 2010 Stock Incentive Plan may be issued in connection with options, warrants, rights, restricted stock, or other stock-based awards.
(4)The payout for 321,955 shares of our outstanding performance-based restricted stock grants may be increased up to 200% of the target or decreased to zero, subject to the level of performance attained. The amount reflected in the table is calculated assuming the maximum payout for all restricted stock grants.

Sales of Unregistered Securities

We did not sell any unregistered securities during 2016.

2019.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

On July 18, 2014,

Under the authorization from the Company’s Board of Directors, approved a commonshares may be purchased from time to time, at the Company’s discretion and subject to the availability of stock, market conditions, the trading price of the stock, alternative uses for capital, the Company’s financial performance and other potential factors. These purchases may be carried out through open market purchases, block trades, accelerated share repurchase plan to authorize the repurchaseplans of up to $200.0 million worth of shares of the Company’s common stock during the period running from the July 18, 2014 approval date to December 31, 2015. As of December 31, 2014, we had repurchased $50.0 million worth of shares of our common stock under the repurchase authorization.

On March 5, 2015, the Company entered into an ASR with an investment bank to purchase an aggregate $100.0 million each (unless otherwise approved by the Board of the Company’s common stock. As part of the ASR, the Company received an initial delivery of 2,667,992 shares of the Company’s common stock with a fair market value of approximately $85.0 million. On August 6, 2015, the Company was notified by its investment bankDirectors), negotiated private transactions or pursuant to any trading plan that the March 5, 2015 ASR agreement between the Company and the investment bank had been completedmay be adopted in accordance with the termsRule 10b5-1 of the agreement. The investment bank delivered toExchange Act.

During 2019, the Company an additional 391,637 shares of the Company’s common stock for a total of 3,059,629 shares repurchased under the agreement. The delivery of the remaining 391,637 shares occurred on August 11, 2015.

On July 20, 2015, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to an additional $400.0 million of the Company’s outstanding common stock, bringing the total available authorization to $450.0 million.
On November 11, 2015, the Company entered into another ASR with an investment bank to purchase an aggregate $75 million of the Company’s common stock. The Company received an initial delivery of 1,985,981 shares of the Company’s common stock with a fair market value of approximately $63.75 million. On January 6, 2016 this agreement was completed by the investment bank with the delivery of 363,209 shares of the Company’s common stock.
Between October 25, 2016 and November 4, 2016, the Company made share repurchases in the open market in total of 209,6181,654,513 shares at an average price per share of $35.46 for a total cost of $7.7$58.7 million. After completing these open marketAt December 31, 2019, the remaining amount authorized by our Board of Directors for share repurchases was $461.3 million. Under the Company’s outstanding Board approved shareauthorized repurchase authorization is $367.3 million.
programs, the Company has repurchased a total of approximately 15.5 million shares for an aggregate cost of approximately $536.2 million between 2014 and 2019.

The following table presents information with respect to our purchases of our common stock during the three months ended December 31, 2016.2019.

Period

 

Total

number of

shares

purchased(1)

 

 

Average

price paid

per share

 

 

Total number of

shares purchased

as part of

publicly

announced

plans or

programs

 

 

Approximate

dollar value of

shares that may

yet be purchased

under

the plans or

programs

 

October 1, 2019 to October 31, 2019

 

 

814,173

 

 

$

35.59

 

 

 

812,933

 

 

$

461,282,789

 

November 1, 2019 to November 30, 2019

 

 

1,160

 

 

 

37.88

 

 

 

 

 

 

461,282,789

 

December 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019

 

 

1,113

 

 

 

38.62

 

 

 

 

 

 

461,282,789

 

Total

 

 

816,446

 

 

$

35.59

 

 

 

812,933

 

 

$

461,282,789

 

(1)

Of the shares reported in this column, 812,933 shares were purchased in open market transactions. All other shares reported in this column are attributable to shares withheld for taxes in connection with the vesting of restricted shares awarded under our Performance Stock Plan and 2010 Stock Incentive Plan.

Period 
Total Number of
Shares
Purchased (1)
 
Average
Price Paid
per Share
 
Total
Number of
Shares
Purchased
as Part of
Publicly
Announced
Plans or
Programs
 
Approximate
Dollar Value of
Shares that May
Yet Be
Purchased Under
the Plans or
Programs
October 1, 2016 to October 31, 2016 105
 $37.34
 
 $375,000,000
November 1, 2016 to November 30, 2016 210,943
 36.57
 209,618
 367,342,175
December 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016 930
 43.62
 
 367,342,175
Total 211,978
 $36.60
 209,618
 $367,342,175
(1) With the exception of 209,618 shares purchased in open market transactions, all other shares reported above are attributable to shares withheld for employees’ payroll withholding taxes pertaining to the vesting of restricted shares awarded under our Performance Stock Plan and Incentive Stock Option Plan.

Performance Graph

The following graph is a comparison of five-year cumulative total shareholder returns for our common stock as compared with the cumulative total shareholder return for the NYSE Composite Index, and a group of peer insurance broker and agency companies (Aon plc, Arthur J. Gallagher & Co, Marsh & McLennan Companies, and Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company). The returns of each company have been weighted according to such companies’ respective stock market capitalizations as of December 31, 20112014 for the purposes of arriving at a peer group average. The total return calculations are based upon an assumed $100 investment on December 31, 2011,2014, with all dividends reinvested.

 

 

12/14

 

 

12/15

 

 

12/16

 

 

12/17

 

 

12/18

 

 

12/19

 

Brown & Brown, Inc.

 

 

100.00

 

 

 

117.76

 

 

 

162.40

 

 

 

175.68

 

 

 

206.91

 

 

 

285.13

 

NYSE Composite

 

 

100.00

 

 

 

96.03

 

 

 

107.62

 

 

 

127.96

 

 

 

116.72

 

 

 

146.76

 

Peer Group

 

 

100.00

 

 

 

104.96

 

 

 

121.53

 

 

 

147.49

 

 

 

162.17

 

 

 

221.50

 

 12/11 12/12 12/13 12/14 12/15 12/16
Brown & Brown, Inc.100.00
 114.03
 142.25
 150.99
 149.35
 211.06
NYSE Composite100.00
 116.03
 146.27
 156.21
 150.15
 167.91
Peer Group100.00
 132.13
 177.92
 193.88
 191.20
 223.36

22


Table of Contents

23


Table of Contents

ITEM 6. Selected Financial Data.

The following selected Consolidated Financial Data for each of the five fiscal years in the period ended December 31, have been derived from our Consolidated Financial Statements. Such data should be read in conjunction with Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in Item 7 of Part II of this Annual Report and with our Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes thereto in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report.

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

(in thousands, except per share data, number of employees and percentages

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

REVENUES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commissions and fees

 

$

2,384,737

 

 

$

2,009,857

 

 

$

1,857,270

 

 

$

1,762,787

 

 

$

1,656,951

 

Investment income

 

 

5,780

 

 

 

2,746

 

 

 

1,626

 

 

 

1,456

 

 

 

1,004

 

Other income, net

 

 

1,654

 

 

 

1,643

 

 

 

22,451

 

 

 

2,386

 

 

 

2,554

 

Total revenues(1)

 

 

2,392,171

 

 

 

2,014,246

 

 

 

1,881,347

 

 

 

1,766,629

 

 

 

1,660,509

 

EXPENSES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Employee compensation and benefits

 

 

1,308,165

 

 

 

1,068,914

 

 

 

994,652

 

 

 

925,217

 

 

 

856,952

 

Other operating expenses

 

 

377,089

 

 

 

332,118

 

 

 

283,470

 

 

 

262,872

 

 

 

251,055

 

(Gain)/loss on disposal

 

 

(10,021

)

 

 

(2,175

)

 

 

(2,157

)

 

 

(1,291

)

 

 

(619

)

Amortization

 

 

105,298

 

 

 

86,544

 

 

 

85,446

 

 

 

86,663

 

 

 

87,421

 

Depreciation

 

 

23,417

 

 

 

22,834

 

 

 

22,698

 

 

 

21,003

 

 

 

20,890

 

Interest

 

 

63,660

 

 

 

40,580

 

 

 

38,316

 

 

 

39,481

 

 

 

39,248

 

Change in estimated acquisition earn-out payables

 

 

(1,366

)

 

 

2,969

 

 

 

9,200

 

 

 

9,185

 

 

 

3,003

 

Total expenses

 

 

1,866,242

 

 

 

1,551,784

 

 

 

1,431,625

 

 

 

1,343,130

 

 

 

1,257,950

 

Income before income taxes

 

 

525,929

 

 

 

462,462

 

 

 

449,722

 

 

 

423,499

 

 

 

402,559

 

Income taxes(2)

 

 

127,415

 

 

 

118,207

 

 

 

50,092

 

 

 

166,008

 

 

 

159,241

 

Net income

 

$

398,514

 

 

$

344,255

 

 

$

399,630

 

 

$

257,491

 

 

$

243,318

 

EARNINGS PER SHARE INFORMATION

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income per share - diluted(3)

 

$

1.40

 

 

$

1.22

 

 

$

1.40

 

 

$

0.91

 

 

$

0.85

 

Weighted average number of shares outstanding - diluted(3)

 

 

274,616

 

 

 

275,521

 

 

 

277,586

 

 

 

275,608

 

 

 

280,224

 

Dividends declared per share(3)

 

$

0.33

 

 

$

0.31

 

 

$

0.28

 

 

$

0.25

 

 

$

0.23

 

YEAR-END FINANCIAL POSITION

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total assets(4)

 

$

7,622,821

 

 

$

6,688,668

 

 

$

5,747,550

 

 

$

5,262,734

 

 

$

4,979,844

 

Long-term debt(5)

 

$

1,500,343

 

 

$

1,456,990

 

 

$

856,141

 

 

$

1,018,372

 

 

$

1,071,618

 

Total shareholders’ equity

 

$

3,350,279

 

 

$

3,000,568

 

 

$

2,582,699

 

 

$

2,360,211

 

 

$

2,149,776

 

Total shares outstanding at year end(3)

 

 

281,655

 

 

 

279,583

 

 

 

276,210

 

 

 

280,208

 

 

 

277,970

 

OTHER INFORMATION

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of full-time equivalent employees at year-end

 

 

10,083

 

 

 

9,590

 

 

 

8,491

 

 

 

8,297

 

 

 

7,807

 

Total revenues per average number of employees(6)

 

$

243,193

 

 

$

222,809

 

 

$

224,130

 

 

$

219,403

 

 

$

215,679

 

Stock price at year-end(3)

 

$

39.48

 

 

$

27.56

 

 

$

25.73

 

 

$

22.43

 

 

$

16.05

 

Stock price earnings multiple at year-end(7)

 

 

28.2

 

 

 

22.6

 

 

 

18.3

 

 

 

24.6

 

 

 

18.9

 

Return on beginning shareholders’ equity(8)

 

 

13

%

 

 

13

%

 

 

17

%

 

 

12

%

 

 

12

%

(in thousands, except per share data, number of employees and percentages Year Ended December 31 
 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 
REVENUES           
Commissions and fees $1,762,787
 $1,656,951
 $1,567,460
 $1,355,503
 $1,189,081
 
Investment income 1,456
 1,004
 747
 638
 797
 
Other income, net 2,386
 2,554
 7,589
 7,138
 10,154
 
Total revenues 1,766,629
 1,660,509
 1,575,796
 1,363,279
 1,200,032
 
EXPENSES           
Employee compensation and benefits 925,217
 856,952
 811,112
 705,603
 624,371
 
Other operating expenses 262,872
 251,055
 235,328
 195,677
 174,389
 
Loss/(gain) on disposal (1,291) (619) 47,425
 
 
 
Amortization 86,663
 87,421
 82,941
 67,932
 63,573
 
Depreciation 21,003
 20,890
 20,895
 17,485
 15,373
 
Interest 39,481
 39,248
 28,408
 16,440
 16,097
 
Change in estimated acquisition earn-out payables 9,185
 3,003
 9,938
 2,533
 1,418
 
Total expenses 1,343,130
 1,257,950
 1,236,047
 1,005,670
 895,221
 
Income before income taxes 423,499
 402,559
 339,749
 357,609
 304,811
 
Income taxes 166,008
 159,241
 132,853
 140,497
 120,766
 
Net income $257,491
 $243,318
 $206,896
 $217,112
 $184,045
 
EARNINGS PER SHARE INFORMATION           
Net income per share - diluted $1.82
 $1.70
 $1.41
 $1.48
 $1.26
 
Weighted-average number of shares outstanding - diluted 137,804
 140,112
 142,891
 142,624
 142,010
 
Dividends declared per share $0.50
 $0.45
 $0.41
 $0.37
 $0.35
 
YEAR-END FINANCIAL POSITION           
Total assets $5,287,343
 $5,004,479
 $4,946,560
 $3,648,679
 $3,127,194
 
Long-term debt(1)
 $1,018,372
 $1,071,618
 $1,142,948
 $379,171
 $449,136
 
Total shareholders’ equity $2,360,211
 $2,149,776
 $2,113,745
 $2,007,141
 $1,807,333
 
Total shares outstanding at year end 140,104
 138,985
 143,486
 145,419
 143,878
 
OTHER INFORMATION           
Number of full-time equivalent employees at year end 8,297
 7,807
 7,591
 6,992
 6,438
 
Total revenues per average number of employees(2)
 $219,403
 $215,679
 $216,114
 $203,020
 $191,729
(3) 
Stock price at year end $44.86
 $32.10
 $32.91
 $31.39
 $25.46
 
Stock price earnings multiple at year-end(4)
 24.6
 18.9
 23.3
 21.2
 20.2
 
Return on beginning shareholders’ equity(5)
 12% 12% 10% 12% 11% 

(1)

Years 2017 to 2015 do not reflect the adoption of “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” (“Topic 606”), ASC Topic 340 - Other Assets and Deferred Cost (“ASC 340”) and ASU 2016-08, “Principal Versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross Versus Net)”, which was adopted under the modified retrospective method.

(1)

(2)

Years 2017 to 2015 do not reflect the adoption of ASU 2016-09, “Improvements to Employee Share Based Payment Accounting” (“ASU 2016-09”), which was adopted using the prospective method.

(3)

Years 2017 to 2015 reflect the 2-for-1 stock split that occurred on March 28, 2018.    

(4)

All years presented reflect the adoption of ASU No. 2015-17, “Income Taxes (Topic 740) - Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes” (“ASU 2015-17”).

(5)

Please refer to Part I, Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and Note 89 “Long-Term Debt” for more details.

(6)

(2)

Represents total revenues divided by the average of the number of full-time equivalent employees at the beginning of the year and the number of full-time equivalent employees at the end of the year.

(7)

(3)Of the 881 increase in the number of full-time equivalent employees from 2011 to 2012, 523 employees related to the January 9, 2012 acquisition of Arrowhead, and therefore, are considered to be full-time equivalent as of January 1, 2012. Thus, the average number of full-time equivalent employees for 2012 is considered to be 6,259.
(4)

Stock price at year-end divided by net income per share diluted.

(8)

(5)

Represents net income divided by total shareholders’ equity as of the beginning of the year.


24


Table of Contents

ITEM 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

General

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and the related Notes to those Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. In addition, please see “Information Regarding Non-GAAP Measures” below, regarding important information on non-GAAP financial measures contained in our discussion and analysis.

We are a diversified insurance agency, wholesale brokerage, insurance programs and services organization headquartered in Daytona Beach, Florida. As an insurance intermediary, our principal sources of revenue are commissions paid by insurance companies and, to a lesser extent, fees paid directly by customers. Commission revenues generally represent a percentage of the premium paid by an insured and are affected by fluctuations in both premium rate levels charged by insurance companies and the insureds’ underlying “insurable exposure units,” which are units that insurance companies use to measure or express insurance exposed to risk (such as property values, or sales and payroll levels) to determine what premium to charge the insured. Insurance companies establish these premium rates based upon many factors, including loss experience, risk profile and reinsurance rates paid by such insurance companies, none of which we control.

We have increased revenues every year from 1993 to 2016,2019, with the exception of 2009, when our revenues droppeddeclined 1.0%. Our revenues grew from $95.6 million in 1993 to $1.8$2.4 billion in 2016,2019, reflecting a compound annual growth rate of 13.5%13.2%. In the same 23-year26-year period, we increased net income from $8.1 million to $257.5$398.5 million in 2016,2019, a compound annual growth rate of 16.2%.

The volume of business from new and existing customers, fluctuations in insurable exposure units, changes in premium rate levels, and changes in general economic and competitive conditions, and the occurrence of catastrophic weather events all affect our revenues. For example, level rates of inflation or a general decline in economic activity could limit increases in the values of insurable exposure units. Conversely, increasing costs of litigation settlements and awards could cause some customers to seek higher levels of insurance coverage. Historically, our revenues have typically grown as a result of our focus on net new business growth and acquisitions. We foster a strong, decentralized sales and service culture that leverages the broad capabilities and scale of our organization, with the goal of consistent, sustained growth over the long-term.

The term “Organic Revenue”,Revenue,” a non-GAAP measure, is our core commissions and fees lessless: (i) the core commissions and fees earned for the first twelve12 months by newly-acquired operations and (ii) divested business (core commissions and fees generated from offices, books of business or niches sold or terminated during the comparable period)., and for the calculation of Organic Revenue growth in 2018 only (iii) the impact of the adoption of Accounting Standards Update No.2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” and Accounting Standards Codification Topic 340 – Other Assets and Deferred Cost (the “New Revenue Standard”) in order to be on a comparable basis with 2017. The term “core commissions and fees” excludes profit-sharing contingent commissions and guaranteed supplemental commissions, and therefore represents the revenues earned directly from specific insurance policies sold, and specific fee-based services rendered. “Organic Revenue” is reported in this manner in order to express the current year’s core commissions and fees on a comparable basis with the prior year’s core commissions and fees. The resulting net change reflects the aggregate changes attributable toto: (i) net new and lost accounts, (ii) net changes in our customers’ exposure units, (iii) net changes in insurance premium rates or the commission rate paid to us by our carrier partners;partners, and (iv) the net change in fees paid to us by our customers. Organic Revenue is reported in the Results“Results of OperationsOperations” and in the Results“Results of Operations - Segment sectionsInformation” of this formAnnual Report on Form 10-K.

We also earn “profit-sharing contingent commissions,” which are profit-sharing commissions based primarily on underwriting results, but which may also reflect considerations for volume, growth and/or retention. These commissions, which are included in our commissions and fees in the Consolidated Statement of Income, are accrued throughout the year based on actual premiums written and are primarily received in the first and second quarters of each year, based upon the aforementioned considerations for the prior year(s). Prior to the adoption of the New Revenue Standard, these commissions were recorded to income when received. As a result of our adoption of the New Revenue Standard these commissions are now accrued based upon the placement of policies during the year and the expected payments to be received. Over the last three years, profit-sharing contingent commissions have averaged approximately 3.6%3.0% of the previous year’s total commissions and fees revenue. Profit-sharing contingent commissions are included in our total commissions and fees in the Consolidated Statement of Income in the year received.

Certain insurance companies offer guaranteed fixed-base agreements, referred to as “Guaranteed Supplemental Commissions” (“GSCs”) in lieu of profit-sharing contingent commissions. Since GSCs are not subject to the uncertainty of loss ratios, they are accrued throughout the year based upon actual premiums written. For the year ended December 31, 2016,2019, we had earned $11.5$23.1 million of GSCs, of which $9.2$12.7 million remained accrued at December 31, 2016 as2019 and most of this will be collected inover the first quarterand second quarters of 2017.2020. For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015,2019 and 2014,2018, we earned $11.5 million, $10.0$23.1 million and $9.9$10.0 million, respectively, from GSCs.

Combined, our profit-sharing contingent commissions and GSCs for the year ended December 31, 2019 increased by $16.4 million over 2018. The net increase of $16.4 million was mainly driven by: (i) a GSC of approximately $9 million recorded in the second quarter of 2019 for the National Programs Segment that will not recur in the future as the associated multi-year contract has ended and (ii) to a lesser extent growth associated with acquisitions completed over the last 12 months.

Fee revenues primarily relate to services other than securing coverage for our customers, as well as fees negotiated in lieu of commissions, whichand are recognized as servicesperformance obligations are rendered.satisfied. Fee revenues have historically been generated primarily by: (1) our Services Segment, which provides insurance-related services, including third-party claims administration and comprehensive medical utilization management services in both the workers’ compensation and all-lines liability arenas, as well as Medicare Set-aside services, Social Security disability and Medicare benefits advocacy services, and claims adjusting services; (2) our National Programs and Wholesale Brokerage Segments, which earn fees primarily for the issuance of insurance policies on behalf of insurance companiescompanies; and to a lesser extent (3) our Retail Segment in our

25


Table of Contents

large-account customer base. Ourbase, where we primarily earn fees for securing insurance for our customers, and in our automobile dealer services are provided over a period of time, which is typically one year.(“F&I”) businesses where we primarily earn fees for assisting our customers with selling warranty and service programs. Fee revenues on a consolidated basis, as a percentage of our total commissions and fees, represented 31.3%27.1% in 2016, 30.6%2019 and 26.3% in 2015 and 30.6% in 2014.

Additionally, our profit-sharing contingent commissions and GSCs for the year ended December 31, 2016 increased by $3.7 million over 2015 primarily as a result of an increase in profit-sharing contingent commissions and GSCs in the Retail Segment, partially offset by a decrease in profit-sharing contingent commissions in the Wholesale Brokerage Segment as a result of increased loss ratios. Other income decreased by $0.2 million primarily as a result of a reduction in the gains on the sale of books of business when compared to 2015 and the change in where this activity is presented in the financial statements as described in the results of operations section below.

2018.

For the years ended December 31, 20162019 and 2015,2018, our consolidated organic revenuecommissions and fees growth rate was 3.0%18.7% and 2.6%8.2%, respectively, and our consolidated Organic Revenue growth rate was 3.6% and 2.4%, respectively. Additionally, each of our four segments recorded positive organic revenue growth for the year ended December 31, 2016. In the event that the gradual increases in insurable exposure units that occurred in the past few years continues through 20172020 and premium rate changes are similar with 2016,2019, we believe we will continue to see positive quarterly organic revenueOrganic Revenue growth rates in 2017.

2020.

Historically, investment income has consisted primarily of interest earnings on operating cash, and where permitted, on premiums and advance premiums collected and held in a fiduciary capacity before being remitted to insurance companies. Our policy is to invest available funds in high-quality, short-term fixed income investment securities. Investment income also includes gains and losses realized from the sale of investments. Other income primarily reflects legal settlements and other miscellaneous income.

Income before income taxes for the yearsyear ended December 31, 20162019 increased over 20152018 by $20.9$63.5 million, primarily as a result of net new business and acquisitions completed since 2018 in addition to leveraging expenses, partially offset by additional interest expense and amortization associated with the acquisitions over the past twelve monthstwo years, with the largest being our acquisition of The Hays Group, Inc. and net new business.

certain of its affiliates (“Hays”).

Information Regarding Non-GAAP Measures

In the discussion and analysis of our results of operations, in addition to reporting financial results in accordance with GAAP,generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), we provide information regardingreferences to the following non-GAAP measures:financial measures as defined in Regulation G of SEC rules: Organic Revenue, Organic Revenue growth, EBITDAC and Organic Revenue growth after adjusting for the significant revenue recorded at our former Colonial Claims operation in the first half of 2013 attributable to Superstorm Sandy (“2014 Total core commissions and fees-adjusted”).EBITDAC Margin. We view each of these non-GAAP financial measures as important indicators when assessing and evaluating our performance on a consolidated basis and for each of our segments because they allow us to determine a more comparable, but non-GAAP, measurement of revenue growth and operating performance that is associated with the revenue sources that were a part of our business in both the current and prior yearyear. We believe that Organic Revenue provides a meaningful representation of our operating performance and thatview Organic Revenue growth as an important indicator when assessing and evaluating the performance of our four segments. Organic Revenue can be expressed as a dollar amount or a percentage rate when describing Organic Revenue growth. We also use Organic Revenue growth and EBITDAC Margin for incentive compensation determinations for executive officers and other key employees. We view EBITDAC and EBITDAC Margin as important indicators of operating performance, because they allow us to determine more comparable, but non-GAAP, measurements of our operating margins in a meaningful and consistent manner by removing the significant non-cash items of depreciation, amortization and the change in estimated acquisition earn-out payables, and also interest expense and taxes, which are expected to continue in the future.  reflective of investment and financing activities, not operating performance.

These measures are not in accordance with, or an alternative to the GAAP information provided in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We believe that presenting these non-GAAP measures allows readers of our financial statements to measure, analyze and compare our consolidated growth, and the growth of each of our segments, in a meaningful and consistent manner. We present such non-GAAP supplemental financial information asbecause we believe such information providesis of interest to the investment community and because we believe they provide additional meaningful methods of evaluating certain aspects of our operating performance from period to period on a basis that may not be otherwise apparent on a GAAP basis. We believe these non-GAAP financial measures improve the comparability of results between periods by eliminating the impact of certain items that have a high degree of variability. Our industry peers may provide similar supplemental non-GAAP information with respect to one or more of these measures, although they may not use the same or comparable terminology and may not make identical adjustments. This supplemental financial information should be considered in addition to, not in lieu of, our Consolidated Financial Statements.

Tabular reconciliations of this supplemental non-GAAP financial information to our most comparable GAAP information are contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K under “Results of Operation - Segment Information.”

Acquisitions

Part of our continuing business strategy is to attract high-quality insurance intermediaries and service organizations to join our operations. From 1993 through the fourth quarter of 2016,2019, we acquired 479536 insurance intermediary operations, excluding acquired books of business (customer accounts). During

On November 15, 2018, we completed the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company acquired theacquisition of certain assets and assumedassumption of certain liabilities of seven insurance intermediaries, allHays. At closing, we delivered a payment of $705 million, consisting of $605 million in cash and the issuance to certain key owners of Hays of 3,376,103 shares of our common stock for a total value of $100.0 million. In addition, the Company may pay additional consideration to Hays in the form of earn-out payments in the aggregate amount of up to $25.0 million in cash over three years, which is subject to certain conditions and the successful achievement of average annual EBITDA targets for the acquired business during 2019, 2020 and 2021. This transaction was initially funded through utilization of the stockCompany’s revolving line of one insurance intermediarycredit within our credit facility, details of which can be found in “Management’s Discussion and three booksAnalysis of business (customer accounts). Collectively, these acquired business that had annualized revenuesFinancial Condition”, “Results of approximately $56 million.

Operations” and Note 9 “Long-Term Debt” in the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements”.

26


Table of Contents

Critical Accounting Policies

Our Consolidated Financial Statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. We continually evaluate our estimates, which are based upon historical experience and on assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. These estimates form the basis for our judgments about the recognition of revenues, expenses, carrying values of our assets and liabilities, of which values are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

We believe that of our significant accounting and reporting policies, the more critical policies include our accounting for revenue recognition, business combinations and purchase price allocations, intangible asset impairments, non-cash stock-based compensation and reserves for litigation. In particular, the accounting for these areas requires significant use of judgment to be made by management. Different assumptions in the application of these policies could result in material changes in our consolidated financial position or consolidated results of operations. Refer to Note 1 “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” for a discussion of the impacts for adopting Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” and No. 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)”.

Revenue Recognition

Commission revenues

The majority of our revenue is commissions derived from our performance as agents and brokers, acting on behalf of insurance carriers to sell products to customers that are recognized asseeking to transfer risk, and conversely, acting on behalf of those customers in negotiating with insurance carriers seeking to acquire risk in exchange for premiums. In these arrangements our performance obligation is complete upon the effective date of the insurancebound policy, as such, that is when the associated revenue is recognized. Where the Company’s performance obligations have been completed, but the final amount of compensation is unknown due to variable factors, we estimate the amount of such compensation. We recognize subsequent commission adjustments upon our receipt of additional information or final settlement, whichever occurs first.

To a lesser extent, the Company earns revenues in the form of fees. Like commissions, fees paid to us in lieu of commission, are recognized upon the effective date onof the bound policy. When we are paid a fee for service, however, the associated revenue is recognized over a period of time that coincides with when the customer simultaneously receives and consumes the benefit of our work, which characterizes most of our claims processing arrangements and various services performed in our property and casualty, and employee benefits practices. Other fees are typically recognized upon the policy premium is processed into our systems and invoicedcompletion of the delivery of the agreed-upon services to the customer, whichever is later. Commission revenues related to installment billings are recognized on the later of the date effective or invoiced, with the exception of our Arrowhead business which follows a policy of recognizing on the later of the date effective or processed into our systems regardless of the billing arrangement. customer.

Management determines thea policy cancellation reserve based upon historical cancellation experience adjusted in accordance with known circumstances. Subsequent commission adjustments are recognized upon

Please see Note 2 “Revenues” in the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” for additional information regarding the nature and timing of our receipt of notification from insurance companies concerning matters necessitating such adjustments. Profit-sharing


contingent commissions are recognized when determinable, which is generally when such commissions are received from insurance companies, or periodically when we receive formal notification of the amount of such payments. Fee revenues, and commissions for employee benefits coverages and workers’ compensation programs, are recognized as services are rendered.
revenues.

Business Combinations and Purchase Price Allocations

We have acquired significant intangible assets through business acquisitions.acquisitions of businesses. These assets generally consist of purchased customer accounts, non-compete agreements, and the excess of purchase prices over the fair value of identifiable net assets acquired (goodwill). The determination of estimated useful lives and the allocation of purchase price to intangible assets requires significant judgment and affects the amount of future amortization and possible impairment charges.

All of our business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001 have been accounted for using the acquisition method. In connection with these acquisitions, we record the estimated value of the net tangible assets purchased and the value of the identifiable intangible assets purchased, which typically consist of purchased customer accounts and non-compete agreements. Purchased customer accounts include the physical records and files obtained from acquired businesses that contain information about insurance policies, customers and other matters essential to policy renewals.renewals of delivery of services. However, they primarily represent the present value of the underlying cash flows expected to be received over the estimated future renewal periods of the insurance policies comprising those purchased customer accounts. The valuation of purchased customer accounts involves significant estimates and assumptions concerning matters such as cancellation frequency, expenses and discount rates. Any change in these assumptions could affect the carrying value of purchased customer accounts. Non-compete agreements are valued based upon their duration and any unique features of the particular agreements. Purchased customer accounts and non-compete agreements are amortized on a straight-line basis over the related estimated lives and contract periods, which range from 3 to 15 years. The excess of the purchase price of an acquisition over the fair value of the identifiable tangible and intangible assets is assigned to goodwill and is not amortized.

Acquisition purchase prices are typically based upon a multiple of average EBITDA, annual operating profit and/or core revenue earned over a one to three-year period within a minimum and maximum price range. The recorded purchase prices for all acquisitions consummated after January 1, 2009 include an estimation of the fair value of liabilities associated with any potential earn-out provisions.provisions, where an earn-out is part of the negotiated transaction. Subsequent changes in the fair value of earn-out obligations are recorded in the Consolidated Statement of Income when incurred.

changes to the expected performance of the associated business are realized.

27


Table of Contents

The fair value of earn-out obligations is based upon the present value of the expected future payments to be made to the sellers of the acquired businesses in accordance with the provisions contained in the respective purchase agreements. In determining fair value, the acquired business’s future performance is estimated using financial projections developed by management for the acquired business, and this estimate reflects market participant assumptions regarding revenue growth and/or profitability. The expected future payments are estimated on the basis of the earn-out formula and performance targets specified in each purchase agreement compared to the associated financial projections. These estimates are then discounted to a present value using a risk-adjusted rate that takes into consideration the likelihood that the forecasted earn-out payments will be made.

Intangible Assets Impairment

Goodwill is subject to at least an annual assessment for impairment measured by a fair-value-based test. Amortizable intangible assets are amortized over their useful lives and are subject to an impairment review based upon an estimate of the undiscounted future cash flows resulting from the use of the assets. To determine if there is potential impairment of goodwill, we compare the fair value of each reporting unit with its carrying value. If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value, an impairment loss would be recorded to the extent that the fair value of the goodwill within the reporting unit is less than its carrying value. Fair value is estimated based upon multiples of earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation, amortization and change in estimated acquisition earn-out payables (“EBITDAC”), or on a discounted cash flow basis.

Management assesses the recoverability of our goodwill and our amortizable intangibles and other long-lived assets annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable. Any of the following factors, if present, may trigger an impairment review: (i) a significant underperformance relative to historical or projected future operating results;results, (ii) a significant negative industry or economic trend;trend, and (iii) a significant decline in our market capitalization. If the recoverability of these assets is unlikely because of the existence of one or more of the above-referenced factors, an impairment analysis is performed. Management must make assumptions regarding estimated future cash flows and other factors to determine the fair value of these assets. If these estimates or related assumptions change in the future, we may be required to revise the assessment and, if appropriate, record an impairment charge. We completed our most recent evaluation of impairment for goodwill as of November 30, 20162019 and determined that the fair value of goodwill exceeded the carrying value of such assets. Additionally, there have been no impairments recorded for amortizable intangible assets for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019 and 2014.


2018.

Non-Cash Stock-Based Compensation

We grant non-vested stock awards and to a lesser extent, stock options to our employees, with the related compensation expense recognized in the financial statements over the associated service period based upon the grant-date fair value of those awards.

During the performance measurement period, we review the probable outcome of the performance conditions associated with our performance awards and align the expense accruals with the expected performanceoutcome.

During the first quarter of 2016,2018, the performance conditions for approximately 1.4 million260,344 shares of the Company’s common stock granted under the Company’s 2010 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2010 SIP”) were determined by the Compensation Committee to have been satisfied relative to performance-based grants issued in 2011.2013. These grants had a performance measurement period that concluded on December 31, 2015.2017.  The vesting condition for these grants requires continuous employment for a period of up to ten years from the January 20112013 grant date in order for the awarded shares to become fully vested and nonforfeitable.  During the third quarter of 2018, the performance conditions for 2,229,561 shares of the Company’s common stock granted under the Company’s 2010 SIP were determined by the Compensation Committee to have been satisfied relative to performance-based grants issued in July 2013. These grants had a performance measurement period that concluded on June 30, 2018.  The vesting condition for these grants requires continuous employment for a period of up to seven years from the July 2013 grant date in order for the awarded shares to become fully vested and nonforfeitable. As a result of the awarding of these shares, the grantees becamewill be eligible to receive payments of dividends and exercise voting privileges after the awarding date.

date, and the awarded shares will be included as issued and outstanding common stock shares and included in the calculation of basic and in diluted net income per share, where the net income attributable to unvested awarded stock plans is excluded from the total net income attributable to common shares.

During the first quarter of 2017,2019, the performance conditions for approximately 169,000 shares1,954,983 of the Company’s common stock granted under the Company’s Stock Incentive Plan2010 SIP were determined by the Compensation Committee to have been satisfied relative to performance-based grants issued in 2012.2014 and 2016. These grants had a performance measurement period that concluded on December 31, 2016.2018.  The vesting condition for these grants requires continuous employment for a period of up to tenseven years from the January 20122014 grant date and five years from the 2016 grant date in order for the awarded shares to become fully vested and nonforfeitable.  As a result of the awarding of these shares, the grantees will be eligible to receive payments of dividends and exercise voting privileges after the awarding date, and the awarded shares will be included as issued and outstanding common stock shares and included in the calculation of basic and diluted EPS.

net income per share.

During the first quarter of 2020, the performance conditions for approximately 1.9 million shares of the Company’s common stock granted under the Company’s 2010 SIP were determined by the Compensation Committee to have been satisfied relative to performance-based grants issued in 2015 and 2017. These grants had a performance measurement period that concluded on December 31, 2019.  The vesting condition for these grants requires continuous employment for a period of up to seven years from the 2015 grant date and five years from the 2017 grant date in order for the awarded shares to become fully vested and nonforfeitable.  As a result of the awarding of these shares, the grantees will be eligible to receive payments of dividends and exercise voting privileges after the awarding date, and the awarded shares will be included as issued and outstanding common stock shares and included in the calculation of basic and diluted net income per share.

28


Table of Contents

Litigation and Claims

We are subject to numerous litigation claims that arise in the ordinary course of business. If it is probable that a liability has been incurred at the date of the financial statements and the amount of the loss is estimable, an accrual for the costs to resolve these claims is recorded in accrued expenses in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.Financial Statements. Professional fees related to these claims are included in other operating expenses in the accompanying Consolidated Statement of Income as incurred. Management, with the assistance of in-house and outside counsel, determines whether it is probable that a liability has been incurred and estimates the amount of loss based upon analysis of individual issues. New developments or changes in settlement strategy in dealing with these matters may significantly affect the required reserves and affect our net income.


29


Table of Contents

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEARS ENDEDDECEMBER 31, 2016, 20152019 AND 2014

2018

The following discussion and analysis regarding results of operations and liquidity and capital resources should be considered in conjunction with the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes.

For a comparison of our results of operations and liquidity and capital resources for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, please see Part II, Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 26, 2019.

Financial information relating to our Consolidated Financial Results is as follows:

(in thousands, except percentages)

 

2019

 

 

% Change

 

 

2018

 

REVENUES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Core commissions and fees

 

$

2,302,506

 

 

 

18.4

%

 

$

1,944,021

 

Profit-sharing contingent commissions

 

 

59,166

 

 

 

5.9

%

 

 

55,875

 

Guaranteed supplemental commissions

 

 

23,065

 

 

 

131.6

%

 

 

9,961

 

Commissions and fees

 

 

2,384,737

 

 

 

18.7

%

 

 

2,009,857

 

Investment income

 

 

5,780

 

 

 

110.5

%

 

 

2,746

 

Other income, net

 

 

1,654

 

 

 

0.7

%

 

 

1,643

 

Total revenues

 

 

2,392,171

 

 

 

18.8

%

 

 

2,014,246

 

EXPENSES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Employee compensation and benefits

 

 

1,308,165

 

 

 

22.4

%

 

 

1,068,914

 

Other operating expenses

 

 

377,089

 

 

 

13.5

%

 

 

332,118

 

(Gain)/loss on disposal

 

 

(10,021

)

 

 

360.7

%

 

 

(2,175

)

Amortization

 

 

105,298

 

 

 

21.7

%

 

 

86,544

 

Depreciation

 

 

23,417

 

 

 

2.6

%

 

 

22,834

 

Interest

 

 

63,660

 

 

 

56.9

%

 

 

40,580

 

Change in estimated acquisition earn-out payables

 

 

(1,366

)

 

 

(146.0

)%

 

 

2,969

 

Total expenses

 

 

1,866,242

 

 

 

20.3

%

 

 

1,551,784

 

Income before income taxes

 

 

525,929

 

 

 

13.7

%

 

 

462,462

 

Income taxes

 

 

127,415

 

 

 

7.8

%

 

 

118,207

 

NET INCOME

 

$

398,514

 

 

 

15.8

%

 

$

344,255

 

Income Before Income Taxes Margin (1)

 

 

22.0

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

23.0

%

EBITDAC (2)

 

$

716,938

 

 

 

16.5

%

 

$

615,389

 

EBITDAC Margin (2)

 

 

30.0

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

30.6

%

Organic Revenue growth rate (2)

 

 

3.6

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.4

%

Employee compensation and benefits relative

   to total revenues

 

 

54.7

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

53.1

%

Other operating expenses relative to total revenues

 

 

15.8

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

16.5

%

Capital expenditures

 

$

73,108

 

 

 

76.1

%

 

$

41,520

 

Total assets at December 31

 

$

7,622,821

 

 

 

14.0

%

 

$

6,688,668

 

(in thousands, except percentages)2016 
%
Change
 2015 
%
Change
 2014
REVENUES         
Core commissions and fees$1,697,308
 6.4 % $1,595,218
 6.4 % $1,499,903
Profit-sharing contingent commissions54,000
 4.4 % 51,707
 (10.4)% 57,706
Guaranteed supplemental commissions11,479
 14.5 % 10,026
 1.8 % 9,851
Investment income1,456
 45.0 % 1,004
 34.4 % 747
Other income, net2,386
 (6.6)% 2,554
 (66.3)% 7,589
Total revenues1,766,629
 6.4 % 1,660,509
 5.4 % 1,575,796
EXPENSES         
Employee compensation and benefits925,217
 8.0 % 856,952
 5.7 % 811,112
Other operating expenses262,872
 4.7 % 251,055
 6.7 % 235,328
Loss/(gain) on disposal(1,291) 108.6 % (619) (101.3)% 47,425
Amortization86,663
 (0.9)% 87,421
 5.5 % 82,941
Depreciation21,003
 0.5 % 20,890
  % 20,895
Interest39,481
 0.6 % 39,248
 38.2 % 28,408
Change in estimated acquisition earn-out payables9,185
 NMF
 3,003
 (69.8)% 9,938
Total expenses1,343,130
 6.8 % 1,257,950
 1.8 % 1,236,047
Income before income taxes423,499
 5.2 % 402,559
 18.5 % 339,749
Income taxes166,008
 4.2 % 159,241
 19.9 % 132,853
NET INCOME$257,491
 5.7 % $243,318
 17.6 % $206,896
Organic revenue growth rate(1)
3.0%   2.6%   2.0%
Employee compensation and benefits relative to total revenues52.4%   51.6%   51.5%
Other operating expenses relative to total revenues14.9%   15.1%   14.9%
Capital expenditures$17,765
   $18,375
   $24,923
Total assets at December 31$5,287,343
   $5,004,479
   $4,946,560

(1)

“Income Before Income Taxes Margin” is defined as income before income taxes divided by total revenues

(2)

A non-GAAP measure

(1) A non-GAAP measure
NMF = Not a meaningful figure

Commissions and Fees

Commissions and fees, including profit-sharing contingent commissions and GSCs for 2016,2019, increased $105.8$374.9 million to $1,762.8$2,384.7 million, or 6.4%18.7% over 2015.2018. Core commissions and fees revenue for 2016in 2019 increased $102.1$358.5 million, of which approximately $61.7 million represented core commissions and fees from agencies acquired since 2015 that had no comparable revenues. After accounting for divested business of $6.6 million, the remaining net increase of $47.0 million represented net new business, which reflects a growth rate of 3.0% for core organic commissions and fees. Profit-sharing contingent commissions and GSCs for 2016 increased by $3.7 million, or 6.1%, compared to the same period in 2015. The net increase of $3.7 million was mainly driven by an increase in profit-sharing contingent commissions and GSCs in the Retail Segment, partially offset by a decrease in profit-sharing contingent commissions in the Wholesale Brokerage Segment as a result of increased loss ratios. 

Commissions and fees, including profit-sharing contingent commissions and GSCs for 2015, increased $89.5 million to $1,657.0 million, or 5.7% over the same period in 2014. Core commissions and fees revenue in 2015 increased $95.3 million, of which approximately $76.6$298.3 million represented core commissions and fees from acquisitions that had no comparable revenues in 2014. After accounting for divested business of $19.3 million, the remaining net increase of $38.02018; approximately $70.0 million represented net new business,and renewal business; which reflects awas offset by $9.8 million related to commissions and fees revenue from businesses divested in 2018 and 2019, which reflected an Organic Revenue growth rate of 2.6% for core organic commissions and fees.3.6%. Profit-sharing contingent commissions and GSCs for 2015 decreased2019 increased by $5.8$16.4 million, or 8.6%24.9%, compared

to the same period in 2014.2018. The net decreaseincrease of $5.8$16.4 million was mainly driven byby: (i) a decreaseGSC of approximately $9 million recorded in profit-sharing contingent commissions inthe second quarter of 2019 for the National Programs Segment that will not recur in the future as a result of increased loss ratios.
the associated multi-year contract has ended and (ii) the remainder primarily from growth associated with acquisitions completed over the last 12 months.

Investment Income

Investment income increased to $1.5$5.8 million in 2016,2019, compared with $1.0$2.7 million in 20152018. The increase was due to additional interest income driven by higher average invested cash balances. Investment income increased to $1.0 million in 2015, compared with $0.7 million in 2014 due to additional interest income driven byrates and cash management activities to earn a higher yield.

yield on excess cash balances.

30


Table of Contents

Other Income, Net

Other income for 20162019 was $2.4$1.7 million, compared with $2.6$1.6 million in 2015 and $7.6 million in 2014.2018. Other income consists primarily of legal settlements and other miscellaneous income for 2016 and 2015. In 2014, other income included legal settlements and gains and loss on the sale and disposition of fixed assets as well as gains and losses from the sale on books of business (customer accounts). Prior to the adoption of ASU No. 2014-08, “Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity” (“ASU 2014-08”) in the fourth quarter of 2014, net gains and losses on the sale of businesses or customer accounts were reflected in other income. Any such gains or losses are now reflected on a net basis in the expense section since the adoption of ASU 2014-08. We recognized gains of $1.3 million, $0.6 million and $5.3 million from sales on books of business (customer accounts) in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

Employee Compensation and Benefits

Employee compensation and benefits expense increased 8.0%22.4%, or $68.3$239.3 million, in 2016 over 2015.2019 compared to 2018. This increase included $23.3$164.4 million of compensation costs related to stand-alone acquisitions that had no comparable costs in the same period of 2015.2018. Therefore, employee compensation and benefits expense attributable to those offices that existed in the same time periods of 20162019 and 20152018 increased by $45.0$74.8 million or 5.2%7.2%. This underlying employee compensation and benefits expense increase was primarily related to (i) an increase in teammates for certain of our higher growth businesses; (ii) an increase in bonus expense driven by the attainment of various revenue and profit targets within our businesses; (ii) increased producer commissions correlateddue to increasedhigher revenue; (ii) increased(iii) an increase in staff salaries that included severance cost; (iii) increased profit center bonuses dueattributable to increased revenue and operating profit;salary inflation; (iv) the increased costincrease in the value of health insurance;deferred compensation liabilities driven by changes in the market prices of our employees' investment elections, which was substantially offset by other operating expenses; and (v) an increase in non-cash stock-based compensation expense due to forfeiture credits recognized in 2015.the better-than-expected Company performance related to our equity compensation plan and teammate retention. Employee compensation and benefits expense as a percentage of total revenues was 52.4%54.7% for 20162019 as compared to 51.6%53.1% for the year ended December 31, 2015.

Employee compensation and benefits expense increased, 5.7% or $45.8 million in 2015 over 2014. This increase included $26.3 million of compensation costs related to new acquisitions that were stand-alone offices. Therefore, employee compensation and benefits from those offices that existed in the same time periods of 2015 and 2014 increased by $19.5 million or 4.3%. This underlying employee compensation and benefits expense increase was primarily related to (i) an increase in producer and staff salaries as we made targeted investments in our business; (ii) increased profit center bonuses and commissions due to increased revenue and2018.

Other Operating Expenses

Other operating profit; and (iii) the increased cost of health insurance. Employee compensation and benefits expense as a percentageexpenses represented 15.8% of total revenues was 51.6% for 20152019 as compared to 51.5%16.5% for the year ended December 31, 2014.

2018. Other Operating Expenses
As a percentageoperating expenses for 2019 increased $45.0 million, or 13.5%, over the same period of total revenues,2018. The net increase included: (i) $56.5 million of other operating expenses represented 14.9% in 2016, 15.1% in 2015, and 14.9% in 2014. Other operating expenses in 2016 increased $11.8 million, or 4.7%, over 2015, of which $9.5 million was related to stand-alone acquisitions that had no comparable costs in the same period of 2015. The other operating2018; (ii) increased expenses for those offices that existed in the same periods in both 2016 and 2015 increased by $2.3 million or 0.9%, which was primarily attributableassociated with information technology items related to increased data processing related to the information technology spend for our multi-year investment program,and value-added consulting services; partially offset by (iii) the receipt of certain premium tax refunds by our National Flood Program business.
As a percentage of total revenues, other operating expenses represented 15.1% in 2015, 14.9% in 2014, and 14.4% in 2013. Other operating expenses in 2015 increased $15.7 million, or 6.7%, over 2014, of which $12.6 million was related to acquisitions that had no comparable costsincrease in the same periodvalue of 2014. The other operating expenses for those offices that existedcorporate-owned life insurance policies associated with our deferred compensation plan, which was substantially offset by increases in the same periodsvalue of liabilities in both 2015the Company’s deferred compensation plan recognized as expense in employee compensation and 2014, increased by $3.1 million or 1.3%, which was primarily attributable to increased sales meetings, legal and consulting expenses, partially offset by decreases in expenses associated with office rent, telecommunications and bank fees.
benefits.

Gain or Loss on Disposal

The Company recognized agains on disposal of $10.0 million in 2019 and $2.2 million in 2018. The change in the gain on disposal was due to activity associated with book of $1.3 million and $0.6 million in 2016 and 2015 respectively, and a loss of $47.4 million in 2014. The pretax loss for 2014 is the result of the disposal of the Axiom Re business as part of the Company’s strategy to exit the reinsurance brokerage business. Prior to the adoption of ASU 2014-08 in the fourth quarter of 2014, net gains and losses on the sale of businesses or customer accounts were reflected in Other Income.sales. Although we are not in the business of selling customer accounts, we periodically sell an office or a book of business (one or more customer accounts) that we believe does not produce reasonable margins or demonstrate a potential for growth, or because doing so is in the Company’s best interest. In 2014 the Company recognized $5.3 million in gains from sales on books of business (customer accounts) reported as Other Income.


Amortization

Amortization expense decreased $0.8for 2019 increased $18.8 million to $105.3 million, or 0.9%, in 2016, and increased $4.5 million, or 5.5%, in 2015.21.7% over 2018. The decrease for 2016 is a resultincrease reflects the amortization of certain intangibles becoming fully amortized or otherwise written off as part of disposednew intangible assets from recently acquired businesses, partially offset with amortization of new intangibles from recently acquired businesses.by certain intangible assets becoming fully amortized.

Depreciation

Depreciation expense for 2019 increased $0.6 million to $23.4 million, or 2.6% over 2018. The increase for 2015 is a result of the amortization of newly acquired intangibles being greater than the decrease associated with intangibles that became fully amortized or otherwise written off as part of disposed businesses during 2015.

Depreciation
Depreciation expense increased $0.1 million, or 0.5%, in 2016 and remained flat in 2015. These changes were due primarily to the addition of fixed assets resulting from acquisitions completed in 2015 and 2016, net of assets which became fully depreciated. The increase in 2015 was due primarily to the addition of fixed assets resulting from capital projects related to our multi-year technology investment program and other business initiatives, net additions of fixed assets resulting from recent acquisitions, completed since 2014, while the stable level of expense in 2016 versus 2015 reflected capital additions approximately equal to the value of prior capital additions thatpartially offset by fixed assets which became fully depreciated.

Interest Expense

Interest expense for 2019 increased $0.2$23.1 million to $63.7 million, or 0.6%56.9%, in 2016, and $10.8 million, or 38.2% in 2015.over 2018. The increase in 2015 was primarily due to the increased debt borrowingsissued as a result of acquisitions over the past two years, with the largest being our acquisition of Hays, and an increase in our effective rate of interest for the years ended 2015 and 2014. The increased debt borrowings from 2014 include: the Credit Facility term loan entered into in May 2014 in the initial amount of $550.0 million at LIBOR plus 137.5 basis points, and the $500.0 million Senior Notes due 2024 issued in September 2014 at a fixed rate of interest of 4.200%. The Credit Facility term loan proceeds replaced pre-existing debt of $230.0 million with similar rates of interest. The proceeds from the Senior Notes due 2024 were used to settle the Credit Facility revolver debt of $375.0 million, which had a lower, but variable rate of interest based upon an adjusted LIBOR. This transitioned the debt to a favorable long-term fixed rate of interest and extended the date of maturity of those funds. These changes were the result of an evolution and maturation of our previous debt structure and provide increased debt capacity and flexibility. The increase in 2016 versus 2015 is due to thelesser extent a rise in theinterest rates associated with our outstanding floating interest rate of our Credit Facility term loan, partially offset by the scheduled amortized principal payments on the Credit Facility term loan which has reduced the Company’s average debt balance.

balances.

Change in Estimated Acquisition Earn-Out Payables

Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 805-Business Combinations is the authoritative guidance requiring an acquirer to recognize 100% of the fair value of acquired assets, including goodwill, and assumed liabilities (with only limited exceptions) upon initially obtaining control of an acquired entity. Additionally, the fair value of contingent consideration arrangements (such as earn-out purchase price arrangements) at the acquisition date must be included in the purchase price consideration. As a result, the recorded purchase prices for all acquisitions consummated after January 1, 2009 include an estimation of the fair value of liabilities associated with any potential earn-out provisions. Subsequent changes in these earn-out obligations are required to be recorded in the Consolidated Statement of Income when incurred or reasonably estimated. Estimations of potential earn-out obligations are typically based upon future earnings of the acquired operations or entities, usually for periods ranging from one to three years.

31


Table of Contents

The net charge or credit to the Consolidated Statement of Income for the period is the combination of the net change in the estimated acquisition earn-out payables balance, and the interest expense imputed on the outstanding balance of the estimated acquisition earn-out payables.

As of December 31, 2016,2019, the fair values of the estimated acquisition earn-out payables were re-evaluated and measured at fair value on a recurring basis using unobservable inputs (Level 3) as defined in ASC 820-Fair Value Measurement. The resulting net changes, as well as the interest expense accretion on the estimated acquisition earn-out payables, for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015,2019 and 20142018 were as follows:

(in thousands)

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Change in fair value of estimated acquisition earn-out payables

 

$

(7,298

)

 

$

603

 

Interest expense accretion

 

 

5,932

 

 

 

2,366

 

Net change in earnings from estimated acquisition

   earn-out payables

 

$

(1,366

)

 

$

2,969

 

(in thousands)2016 2015 2014
Change in fair value of estimated acquisition earn-out payables$6,338
 $13
 $7,375
Interest expense accretion2,847
 2,990
 2,563
Net change in earnings from estimated acquisition earn-out payables$9,185
 $3,003
 $9,938

For the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019 and 2014,2018, the fair value of estimated earn-out payables was re-evaluated and decreased by $7.3 million for 2019 and increased by $6.3$0.6 million $13.0 thousand and $7.4 million, respectively,for 2018, which resulted in chargesa credit, net of interest expense accretion, to the Consolidated Statement of Income.

Income for 2019 and net charges for 2018.

As of December 31, 2016,2019, the estimated acquisition earn-out payables equaled $63.8$161.5 million, of which $31.8$17.9 million was recorded as accounts payable and $32.0$143.6 million was recorded as other non-current liability. As of December 31, 2015,2018, the estimated acquisition earn-out payables equaled $78.4$89.9 million, of which $25.3$21.1 million was recorded as accounts payable and $53.1$68.8 million was recorded as other non-current liability.


Income Taxes

The effective tax rate on income from operations was 39.2%24.2% in 2016, 39.6%2019 and 25.6% in 2015,2018. The Tax Cuts and 39.1%Jobs Act of 2017 (the “Tax Reform Act”) made changes to the U.S. tax code that affected our income tax rate beginning in 2014.2017. The decreaseTax Reform Act reduced the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate from 35.0% to 21.0% and requires companies to pay a one-time transition tax on certain unrepatriated earnings from foreign subsidiaries that is payable over eight years. The Tax Reform Act also established new tax laws that became effective January 1, 2018. The 2018 and 2019 effective tax rates reflect the reduction in the federal corporate income tax rate. The reduction in the effective tax rate isin 2019 as compared to 2018 was driven by several permanentchanges in our state tax differences along withfootprint and corresponding apportionment as well as changes to tax rates in certain states.  The effective tax rates for 2018 and 2019 reflect the apportionmentadoption of taxable incomeFASB Accounting Standards Update 2016-09, “Improvements to Employee Share Based Payment Accounting” (“ASU 2016-09”) in the states where we operate.

first quarter of 2017. ASU 2016-09, which requires upon vesting of stock-based compensation that any tax implications be treated as a discrete credit to the income tax expense in the quarter of vesting, amends guidance issued in ASC Topic 718, Compensation - Stock Compensation.

32


Table of Contents

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS — SEGMENT INFORMATION

As discussed in Note 1517 “Segment Information” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, we operate four reportable segments: Retail, National Programs, Wholesale Brokerage and Services. On a segmented basis, increaseschanges in amortization, depreciation and interest expenses generally result from completed acquisitions within a given segment within the preceding 12 months.activity associated with acquisitions. Likewise, other income in each segment reflects net gains primarily from legal settlements and miscellaneous income. As such, in evaluating the operational efficiency of a segment, management emphasizesfocuses on the net organic revenueOrganic Revenue growth rate of core commissions and fees, revenue, the ratio of total employee compensation and benefits to total revenues, and the ratio of other operating expenses to total revenues.

The reconciliation of total commissions and fees included in the Consolidated Statement of Income, to organic revenueOrganic Revenue for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2016, and 2015, is as follows:

 For the Year Ended December 31, 
(in thousands)2016 2015
Total commissions and fees$1,762,787
 $1,656,951
Less profit-sharing contingent commissions54,000
 51,707
Less guaranteed supplemental commissions11,479
 10,026
Total core commissions and fees1,697,308
 1,595,218
Less acquisition revenues61,713
 
Less divested business
 6,669
Organic Revenue$1,635,595
 $1,588,549
The growth rates for organic revenue, a non-GAAP measure as defined in the General section of this MD&A, for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 20142019, by Segment, are as follows:

2019

 

Retail(1)

 

 

National Programs

 

 

Wholesale Brokerage

 

 

Services

 

 

Total

 

(in thousands, except percentages)

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Commissions and fees

 

$

1,364,755

 

 

$

1,040,574

 

 

$

516,915

 

 

$

493,878

 

 

$

309,426

 

 

$

286,364

 

 

$

193,641

 

 

$

189,041

 

 

$

2,384,737

 

 

$

2,009,857

 

Total change

 

$

324,181

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

23,037

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

23,062

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

4,600

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

374,880

 

 

 

 

 

Total growth %

 

 

31.2

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

4.7

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

8.1

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.4

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

18.7

%

 

 

 

 

Profit-sharing contingent

   commissions

 

 

(34,150

)

 

 

(24,517

)

 

 

(17,517

)

 

 

(23,896

)

 

 

(7,499

)

 

 

(7,462

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(59,166

)

 

 

(55,875

)

GSCs

 

 

(11,056

)

 

 

(8,535

)

 

 

(10,566

)

 

 

(76

)

 

 

(1,443

)

 

 

(1,350

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(23,065

)

 

 

(9,961

)

Core commissions and fees

 

$

1,319,549

 

 

$

1,007,522

 

 

$

488,832

 

 

$

469,906

 

 

$

300,484

 

 

$

277,552

 

 

$

193,641

 

 

$

189,041

 

 

$

2,302,506

 

 

$

1,944,021

 

Acquisition revenues

 

 

(272,383

)

 

 

 

 

 

(5,721

)

 

 

 

 

 

(3,628

)

 

 

 

 

 

(16,541

)

 

 

 

 

 

(298,273

)

 

 

 

Divested business

 

 

 

 

 

(7,743

)

 

 

 

 

 

(790

)

 

 

 

 

 

(1,268

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(9,801

)

Organic Revenue(2)

 

$

1,047,166

 

 

$

999,779

 

 

$

483,111

 

 

$

469,116

 

 

$

296,856

 

 

$

276,284

 

 

$

177,100

 

 

$

189,041

 

 

$

2,004,233

 

 

$

1,934,220

 

Organic Revenue growth(2)

 

$

47,387

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

13,995

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

20,572

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

(11,941

)

 

 

 

 

 

$

70,013

 

 

 

 

 

Organic Revenue growth %(2)

 

 

4.7

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.0

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

7.4

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

(6.3

)%

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.6

%

 

 

 

 

2016For the Year Ended December 31,  
Total Net
Change
 
Total Net
Growth %
 
Less
Acquisition
Revenues
 
Organic
Growth $(2)
 
Organic
Growth %(2)
(in thousands, except percentages)2016 2015 
Retail(1)
$881,090
 $834,197
 $46,893
 5.6% $31,151
 $15,742
 1.9%
National Programs430,479
 411,589
 18,890
 4.6% 1,680
 17,210
 4.2%
Wholesale Brokerage229,657
 200,835
 28,822
 14.4% 20,164
 8,658
 4.3%
Services156,082
 141,928
 14,154
 10.0% 8,718
 5,436
 3.8%
Total core commissions and fees$1,697,308
 $1,588,549
 $108,759
 6.8% $61,713
 $47,046
 3.0%
The reconciliation of total commissions and fees, included in the Consolidated Statement of Income, to organic revenue for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, is as follows:
 For the Year Ended December 31, 
(in thousands)2015 2014
Total commissions and fees$1,656,951
 $1,567,460
Less profit-sharing contingent commissions51,707
 57,706
Less guaranteed supplemental commissions10,026
 9,851
Total core commissions and fees1,595,218
 1,499,903
Less acquisition revenues76,632
 
Less divested business
 19,336
Organic Revenue$1,518,586
 $1,480,567

Segment results for 2014 have been recast to reflect the current year segmental structure. Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior year amounts reported in this Annual Report on Form 10-K in order to conform to the current year presentation.
2015For the Year Ended December 31,  
Total Net
Change
 
Total Net
Growth %
 
Less
Acquisition
Revenues
 
Organic
Growth $(2)
 
Organic
Growth %(2)
(in thousands, except percentages)2015 2014 
Retail(1)
$836,123
 $789,503
 $46,620
 5.9% $35,644
 $10,976
 1.4%
National Programs412,885
 367,672
 45,213
 12.3% 38,519
 6,694
 1.8%
Wholesale Brokerage200,835
 187,257
 13,578
 7.3% 2,469
 11,109
 5.9%
Services145,375
 136,135
 9,240
 6.8% 
 9,240
 6.8%
Total core commissions and fees$1,595,218
 $1,480,567
 $114,651
 7.7% $76,632
 $38,019
 2.6%
The reconciliation of total commissions and fees, included in the Consolidated Statement of Income, to organic revenue for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, is as follows:
 For the Year Ended December 31, 
(in thousands)2014 2013
Total commissions and fees$1,567,460
 $1,355,503
Less profit-sharing contingent commissions57,706
 51,251
Less guaranteed supplemental commissions9,851
 8,275
Total core commissions and fees1,499,903
 1,295,977
Less acquisition revenues186,785
 
Less divested business
 8,457
Organic Revenue$1,313,118
 $1,287,520
2014For the Year Ended December 31,  
Total Net
Change
 
Total Net
Growth %
 
Less
Acquisition
Revenues
 
Organic
Growth $(2)
 
Organic
Growth %(2)
(in thousands, except percentages)2014 2013 
Retail(1)
$792,794
 $701,211
 $91,583
 13.1% $77,315
 $14,268
 2.0 %
National Programs376,483
 277,082
 99,401
 35.9% 93,803
 5,598
 2.0 %
Wholesale Brokerage194,144
 177,725
 16,419
 9.2% 68
 16,351
 9.2 %
Services136,482
 131,502
 4,980
 3.8% 15,599
 (10,619) (8.1)%
Total core commissions and fees$1,499,903
 $1,287,520
 $212,383
 16.5% $186,785
 $25,598
 2.0 %
Less Superstorm Sandy$
 $(18,275) $18,275
 100.0% $
 $18,275
 100.0 %
2014 Total core commissions and fees-adjusted$1,499,903
 $1,269,245
 $230,658
 18.2% $186,785
 $43,873
 3.5 %

(1)

(1)

The Retail Segment includes commissions and fees reported in the “Other” column of the Segment Information in Note 1517 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, which includes corporate and consolidation items.

(2)

A non-GAAP measurefinancial measure.

There would have been a 3.5%

The reconciliation of total commissions and fees to Organic Growth rate when excludingRevenue for the $18.3 millionyear ended December 31, 2018, by Segment, are as follows:

2018

 

Retail(1)

 

 

National Programs

 

 

Wholesale Brokerage

 

 

Services

 

 

Total

 

(in thousands, except percentages)

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Commissions and fees

 

$

1,040,574

 

 

$

942,039

 

 

$

493,878

 

 

$

479,017

 

 

$

286,364

 

 

$

271,141

 

 

$

189,041

 

 

$

165,073

 

 

$

2,009,857

 

 

$

1,857,270

 

Total change

 

$

98,535

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

14,861

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

15,223

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

23,968

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

152,587

 

 

 

 

 

Total growth %

 

 

10.5

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.1

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

5.6

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

14.5

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

8.2

%

 

 

 

 

Profit-sharing contingent

   commissions

 

 

(24,517

)

 

 

(23,377

)

 

 

(23,896

)

 

 

(20,123

)

 

 

(7,462

)

 

 

(8,686

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(55,875

)

 

 

(52,186

)

GSCs

 

 

(8,535

)

 

 

(9,108

)

 

 

(76

)

 

 

(31

)

 

 

(1,350

)

 

 

(1,231

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(9,961

)

 

 

(10,370

)

Core commissions and fees

 

$

1,007,522

 

 

$

909,554

 

 

$

469,906

 

 

$

458,863

 

 

$

277,552

 

 

$

261,224

 

 

$

189,041

 

 

$

165,073

 

 

$

1,944,021

 

 

$

1,794,714

 

New Revenue Standard

 

 

1,254

 

 

 

 

 

 

(7,973

)

 

 

 

 

 

935

 

 

 

 

 

 

(10,307

)

 

 

 

 

 

(16,091

)

 

 

 

Acquisition revenues

 

 

(73,405

)

 

 

 

 

 

(7,289

)

 

 

 

 

 

(2,514

)

 

 

 

 

 

(7,969

)

 

 

 

 

 

(91,177

)

 

 

 

Divested business

 

 

 

 

 

(1,270

)

 

 

 

 

 

(114

)

 

 

 

 

 

(106

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,490

)

Organic Revenue(2)

 

$

935,371

 

 

$

908,284

 

 

$

454,644

 

 

$

458,749

 

 

$

275,973

 

 

$

261,118

 

 

$

170,765

 

 

$

165,073

 

 

$

1,836,753

 

 

$

1,793,224

 

Organic Revenue growth(2)

 

$

27,087

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

(4,105

)

 

 

 

 

 

$

14,855

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

5,692

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

43,529

 

 

 

 

 

Organic Revenue growth %(2)

 

 

3.0

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

(0.9

)%

 

 

 

 

 

 

5.7

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.4

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.4

%

 

 

 

 

(1)

The Retail Segment includes commissions and fees reported in the “Other” column of the Segment Information in Note 17 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, which includes corporate and consolidation items.

(2)

A non-GAAP financial measure.

33


Table of revenues recorded at our Colonial Claims operationContents

The reconciliation of income before incomes taxes, included in the first halfConsolidated Statement of 2013 relatedIncome, to Superstorm Sandy.EBITDAC, a non-GAAP measure, and Income Before Income Taxes Margin to EBITDAC Margin, a non-GAAP measure, for the year ended December 31, 2019, is as follows:

(in thousands)

 

Retail

 

 

National

Programs

 

 

Wholesale

Brokerage

 

 

Services

 

 

Other

 

 

Total

 

Income before income taxes

 

$

222,875

 

 

$

143,737

 

 

$

82,739

 

 

$

40,337

 

 

$

36,241

 

 

$

525,929

 

Income Before Income Taxes Margin

 

 

16.3

%

 

 

27.7

%

 

 

26.7

%

 

 

20.8

%

 

NMF

 

 

 

22.0

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amortization

 

 

63,146

 

 

 

25,482

 

 

 

11,191

 

 

 

5,479

 

 

 

 

 

 

105,298

 

Depreciation

 

 

7,390

 

 

 

6,791

 

 

 

1,674

 

 

 

1,229

 

 

 

6,333

 

 

 

23,417

 

Interest

 

 

87,295

 

 

 

16,690

 

 

 

4,756

 

 

 

4,404

 

 

 

(49,485

)

 

 

63,660

 

Change in estimated acquisition

   earn-out payables

 

 

8,004

 

 

 

(751

)

 

 

(4

)

 

 

(8,615

)

 

 

 

 

 

(1,366

)

EBITDAC

 

$

388,710

 

 

$

191,949

 

 

$

100,356

 

 

$

42,834

 

 

$

(6,911

)

 

$

716,938

 

EBITDAC Margin

 

 

28.4

%

 

 

37.0

%

 

 

32.4

%

 

 

22.1

%

 

NMF

 

 

 

30.0

%

NMF = Not a meaningful figure

The reconciliation of income before incomes taxes, included in the Consolidated Statement of Income, to EBITDAC, a non-GAAP measure, and Income Before Income Taxes Margin to EBITDAC Margin, a non-GAAP measure, for the year ended December 31, 2018, is as follows:


(in thousands)

 

Retail

 

 

National

Programs

 

 

Wholesale

Brokerage

 

 

Services

 

 

Other

 

 

Total

 

Income before income taxes

 

$

217,845

 

 

$

117,375

 

 

$

70,171

 

 

$

34,508

 

 

$

22,563

 

 

$

462,462

 

Income Before Income Taxes Margin

 

 

20.9

%

 

 

23.7

%

 

 

24.4

%

 

 

18.2

%

 

NMF

 

 

 

23.0

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amortization

 

 

44,386

 

 

 

25,954

 

 

 

11,391

 

 

 

4,813

 

 

 

 

 

 

86,544

 

Depreciation

 

 

5,289

 

 

 

5,486

 

 

 

1,628

 

 

 

1,558

 

 

 

8,873

 

 

 

22,834

 

Interest

 

 

35,969

 

 

 

26,181

 

 

 

5,254

 

 

 

2,869

 

 

 

(29,693

)

 

 

40,580

 

Change in estimated acquisition

   earn-out payables

 

 

1,081

 

 

 

875

 

 

 

815

 

 

 

198

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,969

 

EBITDAC

 

$

304,570

 

 

$

175,871

 

 

$

89,259

 

 

$

43,946

 

 

$

1,743

 

 

$

615,389

 

EBITDAC Margin

 

 

29.2

%

 

 

35.6

%

 

 

31.1

%

 

 

23.2

%

 

NMF

 

 

 

30.6

%

NMF = Not a meaningful figure

34


Table of Contents

Retail Segment

The Retail Segment provides a broad range of insurance products and services to commercial, public and quasi-public, professional and individual insured customers.customers, and non-insurance risk-mitigating products through our automobile dealer services (“F&I”) businesses. Approximately 85.7%81.7% of the Retail Segment’s commissions and fees revenue is commission-based.commission based. Because most of our other operating expenses are not correlated to changes in commissions on insurance premiums, a significant portion of any fluctuation in the commissions we receive, net of related producer compensation and cost to fulfill expense deferrals and releases as required by the New Revenue Standard, will result in a similar fluctuation in our income before income taxes, unless we make incremental investments or modifications to the costs in the organization.

Financial information relating to our Retail Segment is as follows:

(in thousands, except percentages)

 

2019

 

 

% Change

 

 

2018

 

REVENUES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Core commissions and fees

 

$

1,320,810

 

 

 

30.9

%

 

$

1,008,639

 

Profit-sharing contingent commissions

 

 

34,150

 

 

 

39.3

%

 

 

24,517

 

Guaranteed supplemental commissions

 

 

11,056

 

 

 

29.5

%

 

 

8,535

 

Commissions and fees

 

 

1,366,016

 

 

 

31.1

%

 

 

1,041,691

 

Investment income

 

 

149

 

 

NMF

 

 

 

2

 

Other income, net

 

 

1,096

 

 

 

2.4

%

 

 

1,070

 

Total revenues

 

 

1,367,261

 

 

 

31.1

%

 

 

1,042,763

 

EXPENSES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Employee compensation and benefits

 

 

760,208

 

 

 

33.3

%

 

 

570,222

 

Other operating expenses

 

 

228,256

 

 

 

35.0

%

 

 

169,104

 

(Gain)/loss on disposal

 

 

(9,913

)

 

NMF

 

 

 

(1,133

)

Amortization

 

 

63,146

 

 

 

42.3

%

 

 

44,386

 

Depreciation

 

 

7,390

 

 

 

39.7

%

 

 

5,289

 

Interest

 

 

87,295

 

 

 

142.7

%

 

 

35,969

 

Change in estimated acquisition earn-out payables

 

 

8,004

 

 

NMF

 

 

 

1,081

 

Total expenses

 

 

1,144,386

 

 

 

38.7

%

 

 

824,918

 

Income before income taxes

 

$

222,875

 

 

 

2.3

%

 

$

217,845

 

Income Before Income Taxes Margin (1)

 

 

16.3

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

20.9

%

EBITDAC (2)

 

 

388,710

 

 

 

27.6

%

 

 

304,570

 

EBITDAC Margin (2)

 

 

28.4

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

29.2

%

Organic Revenue growth rate (2)

 

 

4.7

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.0

%

Employee compensation and benefits relative to total revenues

 

 

55.6

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

54.7

%

Other operating expenses relative to total revenues

 

 

16.7

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

16.2

%

Capital expenditures

 

$

12,497

 

 

 

82.2

%

 

$

6,858

 

Total assets at December 31

 

$

6,413,459

 

 

 

9.6

%

 

$

5,850,045

 

(in thousands, except percentages)2016 % Change 2015 % Change 2014
REVENUES         
Core commissions and fees$881,729
 5.3 % $837,420
 5.5 % $793,865
Profit-sharing contingent commissions25,207
 14.3 % 22,051
 2.0 % 21,616
Guaranteed supplemental commissions9,787
 18.0 % 8,291
 7.3 % 7,730
Investment income37
 (57.5)% 87
 29.9 % 67
Other income, net646
 (74.1)% 2,497
 NMF
 408
Total revenues917,406
 5.4 % 870,346
 5.7 % 823,686
EXPENSES         
Employee compensation and benefits486,303
 6.3 % 457,351
 5.8 % 432,169
Other operating expenses146,286
 6.4 % 137,519
 2.9 % 133,682
Loss/(gain) on disposal(1,291) 7.0 % (1,207)  % 
Amortization43,447
 (3.8)% 45,145
 5.1 % 42,935
Depreciation6,191
 (5.6)% 6,558
 1.7 % 6,449
Interest38,216
 (6.9)% 41,036
 (5.7)% 43,502
Change in estimated acquisition earn-out payables10,253
 NMF
 2,006
 (73.1)% 7,458
Total expenses729,405
 6.0 % 688,408
 3.3 % 666,195
Income before income taxes$188,001
 3.3 % $181,938
 15.5 % $157,491
Organic revenue growth rate(1)
1.9%   1.4%   2.0%
Employee compensation and benefits relative to total revenues53.0%   52.5%   52.5%
Other operating expenses relative to total revenues15.9%   15.8%   16.2%
Capital expenditures$5,951
   $6,797
   $6,873
Total assets at December 31$3,854,393
   $3,507,476
   $3,229,484

(1)

“Income Before Income Taxes Margin” is defined as income before income taxes divided by total revenues

(2)

A non-GAAP measure

(1) A non-GAAP measure

NMF = Not a meaningful figure

The Retail Segment’s total revenues in 20162019 increased 5.4%31.1%, or $47.1$324.5 million, over the same period in 2015,2018, to $917.4$1,367.3 million. The $44.3$312.2 million increase in core commissions and fees revenue was driven by the following: (i) approximately $31.2$272.4 million related to the core commissions and fees revenue from acquisitions that had no comparable revenues in the same period of 2015;2018; (ii) $15.7$47.4 million related to net new and renewal business; andoffset by (iii) an offsettinga decrease of $2.6$7.7 million related to commissions and fees revenue from businesses or books of business divested in 20152018 and 2016.2019. Profit-sharing contingent commissions and GSCs in 20162019 increased 15.3%36.8%, or $4.7$12.2 million, over 2015,2018, to $35.0 million.$45.2 million primarily from acquisitions completed in 2018 and 2019. The Retail Segment’s organic revenue growth rate for core organictotal commissions and fees revenue was 1.9%31.1% and the Organic Revenue growth rate was 4.7% for 2016 and2019. The Organic Revenue growth rate was driven by revenue from netincreased new business, written during the preceding twelve months along with modest increases in commercial autohigher customer retention and increasing premium rates and underlying exposure unit values that drive insurance premiums, and partially offset by rate reductions inacross most lines of coverage, other than commercial auto, withbusiness over the most pronounced declines realized for insurance premium rates for properties in catastrophe-prone areas.

preceding 12 months.

Income before income taxes for 20162019 increased 3.3%2.3%, or $6.1$5.0 million, over the same period in 2015,2018, to $188.0 million. This growth in income before income taxes was negatively impacted by $10.3 million in expense associated with the change in estimated acquisition earn-out payables, an increase of $8.2 million over the same period in 2015. Other factors affecting this increase were: (i) the net increase in revenue as described above; (ii) a 6.3%, or $29.0 million increase in employee compensation and benefits due primarily to the year on year impact of new teammates related to acquisitions completed in the past twelve months and to a lesser extent continued investment in producers and other staff to support current and future expected organic revenue growth; and (iii) operating expenses which increased by $8.8 million or 6.4%, primarily


due to increased value-added consulting services to support our customers and increases in office rent expense, offset by a combined decrease in amortization, depreciation and intercompany interest expense of $4.9 million.
The Retail Segment’s total revenues in 2015 increased 5.7%, or $46.7 million, over the same period in 2014, to $870.3 million. The $43.6 million increase in core commissions and fees revenue was driven by the following: (i) approximately $35.6 million related to the core commissions and fees revenue from acquisitions that had no comparable revenues in the same period of 2014; (ii) $11.0 million related to net new business; and (iii) an offsetting decrease of $3.0 million related to commissions and fees revenue recorded from business divested in 2014 and 2015. Profit-sharing contingent commissions and GSCs in 2015 increased 3.4%, or $1.0 million, over 2014, to $30.3 million. The Retail Segment’s organic revenue growth rate for core organic commissions and fees revenue was 1.4% for 2015 and was driven by revenue from net new business written during the preceding twelve months along with modest increases in commercial auto rates, and partially offset by: (i) terminated association health plans in the State of Washington; (ii) continued pressure on the small employee benefits business as some accounts adopt alternative plan designs and move to a per employee/per month payment model due to the implementation of the Affordable Care Act; and (iii) reductions in property insurance premium rates specifically in catastrophe-prone areas.
Income before income taxes for 2015 increased 15.5%, or $24.4 million, over the same period in 2014, to $181.9$222.9 million. The primary factors affecting this increase were: (i) the net increase in revenue as described above;above, (ii) offset by a 7.1%33.3%, or $29.4$190.0 million, increase in employee compensation and benefits, due primarily to the year on yearyear-on-year impact of newacquisitions, salary inflation and additional teammates related to acquisitions completedsupport revenue growth, (iii) a combined increase in the past twelve monthsamortization, depreciation and intercompany interest expense of $72.2 million resulting from our acquisition activity in addition to incremental investments in revenue producing teammates;2019 and (iii)2018; (iv) other operating expenses which increased by $3.8$59.2 million, or 2.9%35.0%, due to the impact of our multi-year technology investment program and increased travelprofessional services to support our customers and value added consulting services; offset by (iv) a reductionacquisitions; (v) an increase in the change in

35


Table of Contents

estimated acquisition earn-out payables of $5.5$6.9 million, or 73.1% to $2.0$8.0 million; and (v) a $4.2 million, or 25.7% reductionpartially offset by, (vi) an increase in non-cash stock-based compensation to $12.1 million due to the forfeituregain on disposal associated with the sale of certain grants where performance conditions were not fully achieved.


books of business.

EBITDAC for 2019 increased 27.6%, or $84.1 million, from the same period in 2018, to $388.7 million. EBITDAC Margin for 2019 decreased to 28.4% from 29.2% in the same period in 2018. The decrease in EBITDAC Margin was primarily driven by: (i) the acquisition of  Hays, which had a lower operating margin than the segmental average; partially offset by, (ii) the net increase in revenue excluding Hays; (iii) higher profit-sharing contingent commissions and supplemental commissions; and (iv) an increase in the gain on disposal associated with the sale of certain books of business.

36


Table of Contents

National Programs Segment

The National Programs Segment manages over 5040 programs withsupported by approximately 40100 well-capitalized carrier partners. In most cases, the insurance carriers that support the programs have delegated underwriting and, in many instances, claims-handling authority to our programs operations. These programs are generally distributed through a nationwide network of independent agents and Brown & Brown retail agents, and offer targeted products and services designed for specific industries, trade groups, professions, public entities and market niches.niches and are generally distributed through a nationwide network of independent agents and Brown & Brown retail agents. The National Programs Segment operations can be grouped into five broad categories: Professional Programs, Arrowhead InsurancePersonal Lines Programs, Commercial Programs, Public Entity-Related Programs and the National Flood Program. The National Programs Segment’s revenue is primarily commission-based.

commission based.

Financial information relating to our National Programs Segment is as follows:

(in thousands, except percentages)

 

2019

 

 

% Change

 

 

2018

 

REVENUES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Core commissions and fees

 

$

488,832

 

 

 

4.0

%

 

$

469,906

 

Profit-sharing contingent commissions

 

 

17,517

 

 

 

(26.7

)%

 

 

23,896

 

Guaranteed supplemental commissions

 

 

10,566

 

 

NMF

 

 

 

76

 

Commissions and fees

 

 

516,915

 

 

 

4.7

%

 

 

493,878

 

Investment income

 

 

1,397

 

 

 

176.1

%

 

 

506

 

Other income, net

 

 

72

 

 

 

(8.9

)%

 

 

79

 

Total revenues

 

 

518,384

 

 

 

4.8

%

 

 

494,463

 

EXPENSES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Employee compensation and benefits

 

 

221,425

 

 

 

1.0

%

 

 

219,166

 

Other operating expenses

 

 

105,118

 

 

 

7.3

%

 

 

98,012

 

(Gain)/loss on disposal

 

 

(108

)

 

 

(107.6

)%

 

 

1,414

 

Amortization

 

 

25,482

 

 

 

(1.8

)%

 

 

25,954

 

Depreciation

 

 

6,791

 

 

 

23.8

%

 

 

5,486

 

Interest

 

 

16,690

 

 

 

(36.3

)%

 

 

26,181

 

Change in estimated acquisition earn-out payables

 

 

(751

)

 

 

(185.8

)%

 

 

875

 

Total expenses

 

 

374,647

 

 

 

(0.6

)%

 

 

377,088

 

Income before income taxes

 

$

143,737

 

 

 

22.5

%

 

$

117,375

 

Income Before Income Taxes Margin (1)

 

 

27.7

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

23.7

%

EBITDAC (2)

 

 

191,949

 

 

 

9.1

%

 

 

175,871

 

EBITDAC Margin (2)

 

 

37.0

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

35.6

%

Organic Revenue growth rate (2)

 

 

3.0

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

(0.9

)%

Employee compensation and benefits relative to total revenues

 

 

42.7

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

44.3

%

Other operating expenses relative to total revenues

 

 

20.3

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

19.8

%

Capital expenditures

 

$

10,365

 

 

 

(16.4

)%

 

$

12,391

 

Total assets at December 31

 

$

3,110,368

 

 

 

5.8

%

 

$

2,940,097

 

(in thousands, except percentages)2016 % Change 2015 % Change 2014
REVENUES         
Core commissions and fees$430,479
 4.3 % $412,885
 9.7 % $376,483
Profit-sharing contingent commissions17,306
 11.2 % 15,558
 (25.3)% 20,822
Guaranteed supplemental commissions23
 (23.3)% 30
 42.9 % 21
Investment income628
 199.0 % 210
 28.0 % 164
Other income, net80
 56.9 % 51
 (99.2)% 6,749
Total revenues448,516
 4.6 % 428,734
 6.1 % 404,239
EXPENSES         
Employee compensation and benefits191,199
 4.6 % 182,854
 7.9 % 169,405
Other operating expenses83,822
 (2.7)% 86,157
 9.4 % 78,744
Loss/(gain) on disposal
 (100.0)% 458
  % 
Amortization27,920
 (2.0)% 28,479
 13.3 % 25,129
Depreciation7,868
 8.5 % 7,250
 (7.1)% 7,805
Interest45,738
 (17.9)% 55,705
 12.2 % 49,663
Change in estimated acquisition earn-out payables207
 31.0 % 158
 (49.8)% 315
Total expenses356,754
 (1.2)% 361,061
 9.1 % 331,061
Income before income taxes$91,762
 35.6 % $67,673
 (7.5)% $73,178
Organic revenue growth rate(1)
4.2%   1.8%   2.0%
Employee compensation and benefits relative to total revenues42.6%   42.6%   41.9%
Other operating expenses relative to total revenues18.7%   20.1%   19.5%
Capital expenditures$6,977
   $6,001
   $14,133
Total assets at December 31$2,711,378
   $2,505,752
   $2,455,749

(1)

“Income Before Income Taxes Margin” is defined as income before income taxes divided by total revenues

(2)

A non-GAAP measure

(1) A non-GAAP measure

NMF = Not a meaningful figure

The National Programs Segment’s total revenues in 20162019 increased 4.6%4.8%, or $19.8$23.9 million, over 2015,2018, to a total $448.5$518.4 million. The $17.6$18.9 million increase in core commissions and fees revenue was driven by the following: (i) $14.0 million related to net new and renewal business; (ii) an increase of approximately $1.7$5.7 million related to core commissions and fees revenue from acquisitions that had no comparable revenues in 2015; and (ii) $17.2 million related to net new business2018; offset by (iii) a decrease of $1.3$0.8 million related to commissions and fees revenue recorded in 20152018 from businesses since divested. Profit-sharing contingent commissions and GSCs were $17.3$28.1 million in 2016,2019, which was an increase of $1.7$4.1 million over 2015,2018, which was primarily driven by the improved loss experiencea non-recurring GSC received from one of our carrier partners.

partners in the second quarter of 2019.

The National Programs Segment’s organic revenue growth rate for coretotal commissions and fees revenue was 4.2% for 2016. This organic revenue4.7% and the Organic Revenue growth rate was 3.0% for 2019. The total commissions and fees growth was mainly due to increased flood claims revenuesa new acquisition, strong growth in our earthquake programs, sports and entertainment program, wind programs and a non-recurring GSC received from one of our partners in the on-boardingsecond quarter of 2019. The Organic Revenue growth rate increase was driven by net new customers bybusiness, growth in renewals and higher premium rates in a number of our lender placed coverage program. Growth in these businesses was partially offset by certain programs that have been affected by lower rates and certain carriers changing their risk appetite for new or existing programs.

compared to the prior year.

37


Table of Contents

Income before income taxes for 20162019 increased 35.6%22.5%, or $24.1$26.4 million, from the same period in 2015,2018, to $91.8$143.7 million. The increase iswas the result of a lowerdecline in intercompany interest chargeexpense of $10.0$9.5 million, growth and related scaling of a number of our programs and a non-recurring GSC received from one of our partners in the receiptsecond quarter of certain premium tax refunds by our National Flood Program business, along with revenue growth of $19.8 million.


The National Programs Segment’s total revenues in 20152019.

EBITDAC for 2019 increased 6.1%9.1%, or $24.5 million, over 2014, to a total of $428.7 million. The $36.4 million increase in core commissions and fees revenue was driven by the following: (i) an increase of approximately $38.5 million related to core commissions and fees revenue from acquisitions that had no comparable revenues in 2014; (ii) $6.7 million related to net new business offset by (iii) a decrease of $8.8 million related to commissions and fees revenue recorded in 2014 from businesses since divested. Profit-sharing contingent commissions and GSCs were $15.6 million in 2015, a decrease of $5.3 million from the same period of 2014, which was primarily driven by the loss experience of our carrier partners.

The National Programs Segment’s organic revenue growth rate for core commissions and fees revenue was 1.8% for 2015. This organic revenue growth rate was mainly due to the Arrowhead Personal Property program, which continued to produce more written premium, the Arrowhead Automotive Aftermarket program which received a commission rate increase from their carrier partner, growth in our Wright Specialty education program and the on-boarding of new customers by Proctor Financial. Growth in these businesses was partially offset by certain programs that have been affected by lower rates.
Income before income taxes for 2015 decreased 7.5%, or $5.5$16.1 million, from the same period in 2014,2018, to $67.7$191.9 million. EBITDAC Margin for 2019 increased to 37.0% from 35.6% in the same period in 2018. The decrease isincrease in EBITDAC Margin was related to (i) growth in a number or our programs; and (ii) a non-recurring GSC received from one of our partners in the resultsecond quarter of the $6.0 million gain on the sale2019.

38


Table of Industry Consulting Group (“ICG”), along with the $3.7 million SIP grant forfeiture benefit associated with Arrowhead, which were both credits recorded in 2014. After adjusting for these one-time items in 2014, underlying Income before income taxes increased and was driven by the net revenue growth noted above and expense management initiatives as we grow and scale our programs.


Contents

Wholesale Brokerage Segment

The Wholesale Brokerage Segment markets and sells excess and surplus commercial and personal lines insurance, primarily through independent agents and brokers, including Brown & Brown Retail Segment.retail agents. Like the Retail and National Programs Segments, the Wholesale Brokerage Segment’s revenues are primarily commission-based.

commission based.

Financial information relating to our Wholesale Brokerage Segment is as follows:

(in thousands, except percentages)

 

2019

 

 

% Change

 

 

2018

 

REVENUES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Core commissions and fees

 

$

300,484

 

 

 

8.3

%

 

$

277,552

 

Profit-sharing contingent commissions

 

 

7,499

 

 

 

0.5

%

 

 

7,462

 

Guaranteed supplemental commissions

 

 

1,443

 

 

 

6.9

%

 

 

1,350

 

Commissions and fees

 

 

309,426

 

 

 

8.1

%

 

 

286,364

 

Investment income

 

 

178

 

 

 

7.9

%

 

 

165

 

Other income, net

 

 

483

 

 

 

(0.4

)%

 

 

485

 

Total revenues

 

 

310,087

 

 

 

8.0

%

 

 

287,014

 

EXPENSES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Employee compensation and benefits

 

 

157,924

 

 

 

7.0

%

 

 

147,571

 

Other operating expenses

 

 

51,807

 

 

 

3.2

%

 

 

50,177

 

(Gain)/loss on disposal

 

 

 

 

 

(100.0

)%

 

 

7

 

Amortization

 

 

11,191

 

 

 

(1.8

)%

 

 

11,391

 

Depreciation

 

 

1,674

 

 

 

2.8

%

 

 

1,628

 

Interest

 

 

4,756

 

 

 

(9.5

)%

 

 

5,254

 

Change in estimated acquisition earn-out payables

 

 

(4

)

 

 

(100.5

)%

 

 

815

 

Total expenses

 

 

227,348

 

 

 

4.8

%

 

 

216,843

 

Income before income taxes

 

$

82,739

 

 

 

17.9

%

 

$

70,171

 

Income Before Income Taxes Margin (1)

 

 

26.7

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

24.4

%

EBITDAC (2)

 

 

100,356

 

 

 

12.4

%

 

 

89,259

 

EBITDAC Margin (2)

 

 

32.4

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

31.1

%

Organic Revenue growth rate (2)

 

 

7.4

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

5.7

%

Employee compensation and benefits relative to total revenues

 

 

50.9

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

51.4

%

Other operating expenses relative to total revenues

 

 

16.7

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

17.5

%

Capital expenditures

 

$

6,171

 

 

 

145.1

%

 

$

2,518

 

Total assets at December 31

 

$

1,390,250

 

 

 

8.3

%

 

$

1,283,877

 

(in thousands, except percentages)2016 % Change 2015 % Change 2014
REVENUES         
Core commissions and fees$229,657
 14.4 % $200,835
 3.4 % $194,144
Profit-sharing contingent commissions11,487
 (18.5)% 14,098
 (7.7)% 15,268
Guaranteed supplemental commissions1,669
 (2.1)% 1,705
 (18.8)% 2,100
Investment income4
 (97.3)% 150
 NMF
 26
Other income, net286
 37.5 % 208
 (44.2)% 373
Total revenues243,103
 12.0 % 216,996
 2.4 % 211,911
EXPENSES         
Employee compensation and benefits121,863
 16.4 % 104,692
 1.7 % 102,959
Other operating expenses42,139
 22.6 % 34,379
 (5.1)% 36,234
Loss/(gain) on disposal
 (100.0)% (385) (100.8)% 47,425
Amortization10,801
 10.9 % 9,739
 (9.0)% 10,703
Depreciation1,975
 (7.8)% 2,142
 (13.3)% 2,470
Interest3,976
 NMF
 891
 (31.1)% 1,294
Change in estimated acquisition earn-out payables(274) (133.0)% 830
 (67.5)% 2,550
Total expenses180,480
 18.5 % 152,288
 (25.2)% 203,635
Income before income taxes$62,623
 (3.2)% $64,708
 NMF
 $8,276
Organic revenue growth rate(1)
4.3%   5.9%   9.2%
Employee compensation and benefits relative to total revenues50.1%   48.2%   48.6%
Other operating expenses relative to total revenues17.3%   15.8%   17.1%
Capital expenditures$1,301
   $3,084
   $1,526
Total assets at December 31$1,108,829
   $895,782
   $857,804

(1)

“Income Before Income Taxes Margin” is defined as income before income taxes divided by total revenues

(2)

A non-GAAP measure

(1) A non-GAAP measure

NMF = Not a meaningful figure

The Wholesale Brokerage Segment’s total revenues for 20162019 increased 12.0%8.0%, or $26.1$23.1 million, over 2015,2018, to $243.1$310.1 million. The $28.8$22.9 million net increase in core commissions and fees revenue was driven by the following: (i) $8.7$20.6 million related to net new and renewal business; (ii) $20.2$3.6 million related to the core commissions and fees revenue from acquisitions that had no comparable revenues in 2015; and2018; which was offset by (iii) an offsettinga decrease of $0.1$1.3 million related to commissions and fees revenue recorded in 20152018 from businesses divested in the past year. Contingentsince divested. Profit-sharing contingent commissions and GSCs for 2016 decreased $2.62019 increased $0.1 million over 2015,2018, to $13.2$8.9 million. This decrease was driven by an increase in loss ratios for one carrier. The Wholesale Brokerage Segment’s organic revenue growth rate for core organictotal commissions and fees revenue was 4.3%8.1%, and the Organic Revenue growth rate was 7.4% for 2016, and2019. The Organic Revenue growth rate was driven by net new business, anda modest increasesincrease in exposure units, partially offset by significant contraction in insurance premiumas well as increased rates for catastrophe-prone properties and to a lesser extent all otherseen across most lines of coverage.

business.

Income before income taxes for 2016 decreased $2.12019 increased 17.9%, or $12.6 million, over 2015,2018, to $62.6$82.7 million, primarily due to the following: (i) the net increase in revenue as described above, (ii) a decrease in intercompany interest expense, (iii) a decrease in change in estimated acquisition earn-out payables, which was offset by; (ii)by (iv) an increase in employee compensation and benefits of $17.2$10.4 million, of which $10.8 million was related to acquisitions that had no comparable compensation and benefits in the same period of 2015, with the remainder related to additional teammates to support increased transaction volumes;volumes, compensation increases for existing teammates, and additional non-cash stock-based compensation expense; and (iii) a decrease in profit from lower contingent commissions and GSCs; (iv) a $7.8net $1.6 million increase in other operating expenses, of which $3.2primarily related intercompany technology charges.

EBITDAC for 2019 increased 12.4%, or $11.1 million, was relatedfrom the same period in 2018, to acquisitions that had no comparable expenses$100.4 million. EBITDAC Margin for 2019 increased to 32.4% from 31.1% in the same period of 2015 and (v) higher intercompany interest charge related to acquisitions completed in the previous year.

2018. The Wholesale Brokerage Segment’s total revenues for 2015, increased 2.4%, or $5.1 million, over 2014, to $217.0 million. The $6.7 million net increase in core commissions and fees revenueEBITDAC Margin was primarily driven by the following: (i) $11.1 million related to net new business; (ii) $2.5 million related to the core commissions and fees revenue from acquisitions that had no comparable revenues in 2014; and (iii) an offsetting decrease of $6.9 million related to commissions and fees revenue recorded in 2014 from businesses divested in the past year. Contingent

commissions and GSCs for 2015 decreased $1.6 million over 2014, to $15.8 million.Organic Revenue growth as described above. This decrease was driven by an increase in loss ratios. The Wholesale Brokerage Segment’s organic revenue growth rate for core organic commissions and fees revenue was 5.9% for 2015, and was driven by net new business and modest increases in exposure units, partially offset by significant contraction in insurance premium rates for catastrophe-prone properties.
Income before income taxes for 2015,the intercompany technology charges and increased $56.4 million, over 2014, to $64.7 million, primarily due to the following: (i) the $47.4 million net pretax loss on disposalemployee compensation and non-cash stock-based compensation costs.

39


Table of the Axiom Re business in 2014; (ii) the net increase in revenue as described above and (iii) the impact of the Axiom Re business divested in 2014 that reported lower margins than the Wholesale Brokerage Segment’s average.


Contents

Services Segment

The Services Segment provides insurance-related services, including third-party claims administration and comprehensive medical utilization management services in both the workers’ compensation and all-lines liability arenas. The Services Segment also provides Medicare Set-aside account services, Social Security disability and Medicare benefits advocacy services, and claims adjusting services.

Unlike the other segments, nearly all of the Services Segment’s revenue is generated from fees, which are not significantly affected by fluctuations in general insurance premiums.

Financial information relating to our Services Segment is as follows:

(in thousands, except percentages)

 

2019

 

 

% Change

 

 

2018

 

REVENUES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Core commissions and fees

 

$

193,641

 

 

 

2.4

%

 

$

189,041

 

Profit-sharing contingent commissions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Guaranteed supplemental commissions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commissions and fees

 

 

193,641

 

 

 

2.4

%

 

 

189,041

 

Investment income

 

 

139

 

 

 

(32.2

)%

 

 

205

 

Other income, net

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total revenues

 

 

193,781

 

 

 

2.4

%

 

 

189,246

 

EXPENSES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Employee compensation and benefits

 

 

91,514

 

 

 

6.5

%

 

 

85,930

 

Other operating expenses

 

 

59,433

 

 

 

(3.9

)%

 

 

61,833

 

(Gain)/loss on disposal

 

 

 

 

 

(100.0

)%

 

 

(2,463

)

Amortization

 

 

5,479

 

 

 

13.8

%

 

 

4,813

 

Depreciation

 

 

1,229

 

 

 

(21.1

)%

 

 

1,558

 

Interest

 

 

4,404

 

 

 

53.5

%

 

 

2,869

 

Change in estimated acquisition earn-out payables

 

 

(8,615

)

 

NMF

 

 

 

198

 

Total expenses

 

 

153,444

 

 

 

(0.8

)%

 

 

154,738

 

Income before income taxes

 

$

40,337

 

 

 

16.9

%

 

$

34,508

 

Income Before Income Taxes Margin (1)

 

 

20.8

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

18.2

%

EBITDAC (2)

 

 

42,834

 

 

 

(2.5

)%

 

 

43,946

 

EBITDAC Margin (2)

 

 

22.1

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

23.2

%

Organic Revenue growth rate (2)

 

 

(6.3

)%

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.4

%

Employee compensation and benefits relative to total revenues

 

 

47.2

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

45.4

%

Other operating expenses relative to total revenues

 

 

30.7

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

32.7

%

Capital expenditures

 

$

804

 

 

 

(47.3

)%

 

$

1,525

 

Total assets at December 31

 

$

481,336

 

 

 

2.1

%

 

$

471,572

 

(in thousands, except percentages)2016 % Change 2015 % Change 2014
REVENUES         
Core commissions and fees$156,082
 7.4 % $145,375
 6.5 % $136,482
Profit-sharing contingent commissions
  % 
  % 
Guaranteed supplemental commissions
  % 
  % 
Investment income283
 NMF
 42
 NMF
 3
Other income, net
 (100.0)% (52) (171.2)% 73
Total revenues156,365
 7.6 % 145,365
 6.4 % 136,558
EXPENSES         
Employee compensation and benefits78,804
 2.2 % 77,094
 5.8 % 72,879
Other operating expenses42,908
 19.0 % 36,057
 12.1 % 32,168
Loss/(gain) on disposal
 (100.0)% 515
  % 
Amortization4,485
 11.6 % 4,019
 (2.8)% 4,135
Depreciation1,881
 (5.4)% 1,988
 (10.2)% 2,213
Interest4,950
 (17.1)% 5,970
 (22.2)% 7,678
Change in estimated acquisition earn-out payables(1,001) NMF
 9
 (102.3)% (385)
Total expenses132,027
 5.1 % 125,652
 5.9 % 118,688
Income before income taxes$24,338
 23.5 % $19,713
 10.3 % $17,870
Organic revenue growth rate(1)
3.8%   6.8%   (8.1)%
Employee compensation and benefits relative to total revenues50.4%   53.0%   53.4 %
Other operating expenses relative to total revenues27.4%   24.8%   23.6 %
Capital expenditures$656
   $1,088
   $1,210
Total assets at December 31$371,645
   $285,459
   $296,034

(1)

“Income Before Income Taxes Margin” is defined as income before income taxes divided by total revenues

(2)

A non-GAAP measure

(1) A non-GAAP measure

NMF = Not a meaningful figure

The Services Segment’s total revenues for 20162019 increased 7.6%2.4%, or $11.0$4.5 million, over 2015,2018, to $156.4$193.8 million. The $10.7$4.6 million increase in core commissions and fees revenue was driven primarily by the following: (i) $8.7$16.5 million related to the core commissions and fees revenue from acquisitions that had no comparable revenues in the same period of 2015; and2018; offset by (ii) $5.4a decrease of $11.9 million related to net new business; (iii) partially offsetand renewal business that was driven by a decrease of $3.4 million related tolower weather-related and general property claims activity. The Services Segment’s growth rate for total commissions and fees revenue recordedwas 2.4%, and Organic Revenue declined 6.3% in 2015 from business since divested.2019. The Services Segment’s organic revenue growth rate for core commissionsOrganic Revenue decline was realized primarily in our Social Security advocacy and fees revenue was 3.8% for 2016, primarily driven by our claims.

property claims businesses.

Income before income taxes for 20162019 increased 23.5%16.9%, or $4.6$5.8 million, over 2015,2018, to $24.3$40.3 million due to a combination of: (i) the change in estimated acquisition of SSAD;earn-out payables partially offset by (ii) our claims office that handled catastrophe claims; (iii) the continued efficient operation of our businesses; and (iv) lowerhigher intercompany interest charges.

The Services Segment’s total revenues for 2015 increased 6.4%, or $8.8 million, over 2014, to $145.4 million. The $8.9 million increase in core commissions and fees revenue primarily resulted from growth in our advocacy businesses driven by new customers and growth in several of our claims processing units related to new customer relationships. The Services Segment’s organic revenue growth rate for core commissions and fees revenue was 6.8% for 2015.
Income before income taxes for 2015 increased 10.3%, or $1.8 million, over 2014, to $19.7 millioncharges due to a combination of: (i) organic revenue growth noted above; (ii) the continued efficient operation of our businesses;businesses acquired during 2019 and (iii) a decline in other operating expenses driven by management of our costs.

EBITDAC for 2019 decreased 2.5%, or $1.1 million, over the same period in 2018, to $42.8 million. EBITDAC Margin for 2019 decreased to 22.1% from 23.2% in the same period in 2018. The decrease in EBITDAC Margin was due the intercompany interest expense charge. The impact from the saledecline in Organic Revenue.

40


Table of the Colonial Claims business on 2015 revenues and income before income taxes was immaterial.


As discussed in Note 1517 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, the “Other” column in the Segment Information table includes any income and expenses not allocated to reportable segments, and corporate-related items, including the intercompany interest expense charges to reporting segments.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

The Company seeks to maintain a conservative balance sheet and liquidity profile. Our capital requirements to operate as an insurance intermediary are low and we have been able to grow and invest in our business principally through cash that has been generated from operations. We have the ability to access the use ofutilize our revolving credit facility (the “Revolving Credit Facility”), which currently provides access to up to $800.0$700.0 million in available cash, and we believe that we have access to additional funds, if needed, through the capital markets to obtain further debt financing under the current market conditions. The Company believes that its existing cash, cash equivalents, short-term investment portfolio and funds generated from operations, together with the funds available under the credit facility,Revolving Credit Facility, will be sufficient to satisfy our normal liquidity needs, including principal payments on our long-term debt, for at least the next twelve12 months.

Our cash and cash equivalents of $515.6$542.2 million at December 31, 20162019 reflected an increase of $72.2$103.2 million from the $443.4$439.0 million balance at December 31, 2015.2018. During 2016, $375.12019, $678.2 million of cash was generated from operating activities.activities, representing an increase of 19.5%. During this period, $122.6$353.0 million of cash was used for new acquisitions, $28.2$9.9 million was used for acquisition earn-out payments, $17.8$73.1 million was used for additions to purchase additional fixed assets, $70.3$91.3 million was used for payment of dividends, $7.7$38.7 million was used for share repurchases and $73.1$50.0 million was used to pay outstanding principal balances owed on long-term debt.

We hold approximately $19.9$21.3 million in cash outside of the U.S. for, which we currently have no plans to repatriate in the near future.

Our cash and cash equivalents of $443.4$439.0 million at December 31, 20152018 reflected a decrease of $26.6$134.4 million from the $470.0$573.4 million balance at December 31, 2014.2017. During 2015, $411.82018, $567.5 million of cash was generated from operating activities.activities, representing an increase of 28.4%. During this period, $136.0$923.9 million of cash was used for new acquisitions, $36.8$26.6 million was used for acquisition earn-out payments, $18.4$41.5 million was used for additions to purchase additional fixed assets, $64.1$84.7 million was used for payment of dividends, $175.0$100.0 million was used as part of acceleratedfor share repurchase programs,repurchases and $45.6$120.0 million was used to pay outstanding principal balances owed on long-term debt.

Our cash and cash equivalents of $470.0 million at December 31, 2014 reflected an increase of $267.1 million from the $203.0 million balance at December 31, 2013. During 2014, $385.0 million of cash was generated from operating activities. During this period, $696.5 million of cash was used for acquisitions, $12.1 million was used for acquisition earn-out payments, $24.9 million was used for additions to fixed assets, $59.3 million was used for payment of dividends, and $718.0 million was provided from proceeds received on net new long-term debt.
On May 1, 2014, we completed the acquisition of Wright for a total cash purchase price of $609.2 million, subject to certain adjustments. We financed the acquisition through various modified and new credit facilities.

Our ratio of current assets to current liabilities (the “current ratio”) was 1.22 and 1.16 at both December 31, 20162019 and 2015, respectively.

2018.

Contractual Cash Obligations

As of December 31, 2016,2019, our contractual cash obligations were as follows:

 

 

Payments Due by Period

 

(in thousands)

 

Total

 

 

Less Than

1 Year

 

 

1-3 Years

 

 

4-5 Years

 

 

After 5

Years

 

Long-term debt

 

$

1,565,000

 

 

$

55,000

 

 

$

450,000

 

 

$

710,000

 

 

$

350,000

 

Other liabilities(1)

 

 

73,382

 

 

 

3,290

 

 

 

6,072

 

 

 

5,051

 

 

 

58,969

 

Operating leases(3)

 

 

245,919

 

 

 

49,405

 

 

 

85,193

 

 

 

57,743

 

 

 

53,578

 

Interest obligations

 

 

313,326

 

 

 

62,061

 

 

 

110,984

 

 

 

74,000

 

 

 

66,281

 

Unrecognized tax benefits

 

 

1,127

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,127

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Maximum future acquisition contingency payments(2)

 

 

328,655

 

 

 

44,146

 

 

 

277,532

 

 

 

6,977

 

 

 

 

Total contractual cash obligations

 

$

2,527,409

 

 

$

213,902

 

 

$

930,908

 

 

$

853,771

 

 

$

528,828

 

 Payments Due by Period
(in thousands)Total 
Less Than
1 Year
 1-3 Years 4-5 Years 
After 5
Years
Long-term debt$1,081,750
 $55,500
 $526,250
 $
 $500,000
Other liabilities(1)
67,863
 18,578
 13,175
 1,792
 34,318
Operating leases213,160
 42,727
 73,782
 51,615
 45,036
Interest obligations193,974
 36,550
 58,549
 42,000
 56,875
Unrecognized tax benefits750
 
 750
 
 
Maximum future acquisition contingency payments(2)
117,231
 46,975
 69,601
 655
 
Total contractual cash obligations$1,674,728
 $200,330
 $742,107
 $96,062
 $636,229

(1)

(1)

Includes the current portion of other long-term liabilities.

(2)

Includes $63.8$161.5 million of current and non-current estimated earn-out payables resulting from acquisitions consummated after January 1, 2009.payables.


(3)

Includes $5.8 million of future lease commitments not reflected on the balance sheet.

Debt

Total debt at December 31, 20162019 was $1,073.9$1,555.3 million net of unamortized discount and debt issuance costs, which was a decreasean increase of $70.9$48.4 million compared to December 31, 2015.2018. The decreaseincrease includes (i) a drawdown on the Revolving Credit Facility of $100.0 million on August 9, 2019 in connection with the acquisition of CKP Insurance, LLC and various other acquisitions closed in the third quarter of 2019, (ii) the repayment of $73.1principal of $50.0 million for scheduled principal amortization balances related to our various existing floating rate debt term notes, (iii) amortization of discounted debt related to our various unsecured Senior Notes, and debt issuance cost amortization of $2.1 million, offset by (iv) additional discount to par and aggregate debt issuance costs of $3.7 million related to the issuance of the Company's 4.500% Senior Notes due 2029 as of December 31, 2019.

41


Table of Contents

On March 11, 2019, the Company completed the issuance of $350.0 million aggregate principal amount of the Company's 4.500% Senior Notes due 2029. The Senior Notes were given investment grade ratings of BBB-/Baa3 with a stable outlook. The notes are subject to certain covenant restrictions which are customary for credit-rated obligations. At the time of funding, the proceeds were offered at a discount to the notional amount which also excluded an underwriting fee discount. The net proceeds received from the issuance were used to repay a portion of the outstanding balance of $350.0 million on the Revolving Credit Facility, utilized in connection with financing related to our acquisition of Hays, and for other general corporate purposes. As of December 31, 2019, there was an outstanding debt balance of $350.0 million exclusive of the associated discount balance.

Total debt at December 31, 2018 was $1,507.0 million net of unamortized discount and debt issuance costs, which was an increase of $530.8 million compared to December 31, 2017. The increase reflects the addition of $650.0 million in principal balances, total debt repayments of $120.0 million, net of the amortization of discounted debt related to our 4.200%Senior Notes due 2024, with a fixed interest rate of 4.200% per year and debt issuance cost amortization of $1.7 million plus the addition of $0.5$1.6 million. The Company also added $0.8 million in a short-term note payabledebt issuance costs related to the recent acquisition of Social Security Advocates for the Disabled, LLC.

As ofTerm Loan Credit Agreement (as defined below) that was executed in December 31, 2016,2018.

On May 10, 2018, the Company satisfiedelected to prepay in full the sixth installment of scheduled quarterly principal payments on the Credit Facility term loan. The Company has satisfied $68.8 million in total principal payments through December 31, 2016 since the inception of the note. Scheduled quarterly principal payments are expected to be made until maturity. The balance of $100.0 million from the Credit Facility term loan was $481.3Series E Senior Notes, which  were issued on September 15, 2011 in connection with the December 22, 2006 Master Shelf and Note Purchase Agreement with a national insurance company. Along with accrued interest of $0.7 million and a prepayment premium of $0.7 million as of December 31, 2016. Of the total amount, $55.0 million is classified as current portion of long-term debt in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as the date of maturity is less than one year.

On March 14, 2016, the Company terminated the Wells Fargo Revolver $25.0 million facility without incurring any fees. The facility wasnotes were to mature on December 31, 2016. September 15, 2018. This resulted in a net interest expense savings of $0.8 million after deducting the pro-rated interest expense and prepayment premiums paid when compared to holding the note to maturity paying the full semi-annual coupon interest expense of $2.3 million.

The Company terminatedborrowed approximately $600.0 million under its Revolving Credit Facility on November 15, 2018 in connection with the closing of the acquisition of certain assets and assumption of certain liabilities of Hays.

On December 21, 2018, the Company borrowed $300.0 million under a term loan credit agreement with Wells Fargo RevolverBank, National Association, as it has flexibility withadministrative agent, Bank of America, N.A., BMO Harris Bank N.A. and SunTrust Bank as co-syndication agents, and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, BMO Capital Markets Corp. and SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, Inc. as joint lead arrangers and joint bookrunners (the “Term Loan Credit Agreement”). The Term Loan Credit Agreement provides for an unsecured term loan in the Credit Facility revolver capacity and current capital and credit resources available.

Total debt at December 31, 2015 was $1,153.0initial amount of $300.0 million, which may, subject to lenders’ discretion, potentially be increased up to an aggregate amount of $450.0 million (the “Term Loan”). The Term Loan is repayable over the five-year term from the effective date of the Term Loan Credit Agreement, which was December 21, 2018. Based on the Company’s net debt leverage ratio or a decreasenon-credit enhanced senior unsecured long-term debt rating as determined by Moody’s Investor Service and Standard & Poor’s Rating Service, the current rate of $45.5interest on the Term Loan is 1.25% above the adjusted 1-Month London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”). The Company used $250.0 million comparedof the borrowings to December 31, 2014. This decrease was primarily due to the repayments of $45.6 million in principal payments, and the amortization of discounted debt related to our 4.200% Notes due 2024, of $0.1 million.
On January 15, 2015, the Company retired the Series D Senior Notes of $25.0 million that matured and were issuedreduce indebtedness under the original private placement note agreement from December 2006.
As of December 31, 2015, the Company satisfied the third installment of scheduled quarterly principal payments on theRevolving Credit Facility term loan. Each installment equaled $6.9 million. The Company has satisfied $20.6 million in total principal payments through December 31, 2015. Scheduled quarterly principal payments are expected to be made until maturity. The balance of the Credit Facility term loan was $529.4 million as of December 31, 2015. Of the total amount, $48.1 million is classified as short-term debt and current portion of long-term debt in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as the date of maturity is less than one year representing the quarterly debt payments that were due in 2016.
During 2015, the $25.0 million of 5.660% Notes due December 2016 were classified as short-term debt and current portion of long-term debt in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as the date of maturity is less than one year. On December 22, 2016, the Series C notes were retired at maturity and settled with cash.
Facility.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Neither we nor our subsidiaries have ever incurred off-balance sheet obligations through the use of, or investment in, off-balance sheet derivative financial instruments or structured finance or special purpose entities organized as corporations, partnerships or limited liability companies or trusts.

For further discussion of our cash management and risk management policies, see “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.”

ITEM 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Market risk is the potential loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices, such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates and equity prices. We are exposed to market risk through our investments, revolving credit line, term loan agreements and international operations.

Our invested assets are held primarily as cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, available-for-sale marketable debt securities, non-marketable debt securities, certificates of deposit, U.S. treasury securities, and professionally managed short duration fixed income funds. These investments are subject to interest rate risk. The fair values of our invested assets at December 31, 20162019 and December 31, 2015,2018, approximated their respective carrying values due to their short-term duration and therefore, such market risk is not considered to be material.

We do not actively invest or trade in equity securities. In addition, we generally dispose of any significant equity securities received in conjunction with an acquisition shortly after the acquisition date.

As of December 31, 20162019, we had $481.3$715.0 million of borrowings outstanding under our term loanvarious credit agreements, all of which bearsbear interest on a floating basis tied to the London Interbank OfferedOvernight Rate (LIBOR)(“LIBOR”) and is therefore subject to changes in the associated interest expense. The effect of an immediate hypothetical 10% change in interest rates would not have a material effect on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

As of July 2017, the UK Financial Conduct Authority has urged banks and institutions to discontinue their use of the LIBOR benchmark rate for floating rate debt, and other financial instruments tied to the rate after 2021. The Alternative Reference Rates Committee (“ARRC”) have recommended the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) as the best alternative rate to LIBOR post discontinuance and has proposed a transition plan and timeline designed to encourage the adoption of SOFR from LIBOR.

42


Table of Contents

The Company is currently evaluating the transition from LIBOR as an interest rate benchmark to other potential alternative reference rates, including but not limited to the SOFR interest rate. Management will continue to actively asses the related opportunities and risks associated with the transition and monitor related proposals and guidance published by ARRC and other alternative-rate initiatives, with an expectation the we will be prepared to for a termination of LIBOR benchmarks after 2021.

We are subject to exchange rate risk primarily in our U.K-basedU.K.-based wholesale brokerage business that has a cost base principally denominated in British pounds and a revenue base in several other currencies, but principally in U.S. dollars. Based upon our foreign currency rate exposure as of December 31, 2016,2019, an immediate 10% hypothetical changes of foreign currency exchange rates would not have a material effect on our Consolidated Financial Statements.


43


Table of Contents

ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

Index to Consolidated Financial Statements

Page No.

Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 20142017

45

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20162019 and 20152018

46

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 20142017

47

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 20142017

48

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 20142017

49

Note 1: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

49

Note 2: Business CombinationsRevenues

57

Note 3: GoodwillBusiness Combinations

58

Note 4: Goodwill

65

Note 5: Amortizable Intangible Assets

65

Note 5:6: Investments

65

Note 6:7: Fixed Assets

67

Note 7:8: Accrued Expenses and Other Liabilities

67

Note 8:9: Long-Term Debt

68

Note 9:10: Income Taxes

69

Note 10:11: Employee Savings Plan

71

Note 11:12: Stock-Based Compensation

71

Note 12:13: Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information

74

Note 13:14: Commitments and Contingencies

75

Note 14:15: Leases

75

Note 16: Quarterly Operating Results (Unaudited)

77

Note 15:17: Segment Information

77

Note 16: Reinsurance18: Insurance Company WNFIC

78

Note 17: Statutory Financial Information
Note 18: Subsidiary Dividend Restrictions
Note 19: Shareholders’ Equity

79

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

80


44


Table of Contents

BROWN & BROWN, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

 

 

For the Year Ended December 31,

 

(in thousands, except per share data)

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

REVENUES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commissions and fees

 

$

2,384,737

 

 

$

2,009,857

 

 

$

1,857,270

 

Investment income

 

 

5,780

 

 

 

2,746

 

 

 

1,626

 

Other income, net

 

 

1,654

 

 

 

1,643

 

 

 

22,451

 

Total revenues

 

 

2,392,171

 

 

 

2,014,246

 

 

 

1,881,347

 

EXPENSES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Employee compensation and benefits

 

 

1,308,165

 

 

 

1,068,914

 

 

 

994,652

 

Other operating expenses

 

 

377,089

 

 

 

332,118

 

 

 

283,470

 

(Gain)/loss on disposal

 

 

(10,021

)

 

 

(2,175

)

 

 

(2,157

)

Amortization

 

 

105,298

 

 

 

86,544

 

 

 

85,446

 

Depreciation

 

 

23,417

 

 

 

22,834

 

 

 

22,698

 

Interest

 

 

63,660

 

 

 

40,580

 

 

 

38,316

 

Change in estimated acquisition earn-out payables

 

 

(1,366

)

 

 

2,969

 

 

 

9,200

 

Total expenses

 

 

1,866,242

 

 

 

1,551,784

 

 

 

1,431,625

 

Income before income taxes

 

 

525,929

 

 

 

462,462

 

 

 

449,722

 

Income taxes

 

 

127,415

 

 

 

118,207

 

 

 

50,092

 

Net income

 

$

398,514

 

 

$

344,255

 

 

$

399,630

 

Net income per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

1.42

 

 

$

1.24

 

 

$

1.43

 

Diluted

 

$

1.40

 

 

$

1.22

 

 

$

1.40

 

Dividends declared per share

 

$

0.33

 

 

$

0.31

 

 

$

0.28

 

(in thousands, except per share data)For the Year Ended December 31, 
 2016 2015 2014
REVENUES     
Commissions and fees$1,762,787
 $1,656,951
 $1,567,460
Investment income1,456
 1,004
 747
Other income, net2,386
 2,554
 7,589
Total revenues1,766,629
 1,660,509
 1,575,796
EXPENSES     
Employee compensation and benefits925,217
 856,952
 811,112
Other operating expenses262,872
 251,055
 235,328
(Gain)/loss on disposal(1,291) (619) 47,425
Amortization86,663
 87,421
 82,941
Depreciation21,003
 20,890
 20,895
Interest39,481
 39,248
 28,408
Change in estimated acquisition earn-out payables9,185
 3,003
 9,938
Total expenses1,343,130
 1,257,950
 1,236,047
Income before income taxes423,499
 402,559
 339,749
Income taxes166,008
 159,241
 132,853
Net income$257,491
 $243,318
 $206,896
Net income per share:     
Basic$1.84
 $1.72
 $1.43
Diluted$1.82
 $1.70
 $1.41
Dividends declared per share$0.50
 $0.45
 $0.41

See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


45


Table of Contents

BROWN & BROWN, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except per share data)

 

December 31,

2019

 

 

December 31,

2018

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

542,174

 

 

$

438,961

 

Restricted cash and investments

 

 

420,801

 

 

 

338,635

 

Short-term investments

 

 

12,325

 

 

 

12,868

 

Premiums, commissions and fees receivable

 

 

942,834

 

 

 

844,815

 

Reinsurance recoverable

 

 

58,505

 

 

 

65,396

 

Prepaid reinsurance premiums

 

 

366,021

 

 

 

337,920

 

Other current assets

 

 

152,142

 

 

 

128,716

 

Total current assets

 

 

2,494,802

 

 

 

2,167,311

 

Fixed assets, net

 

 

148,627

 

 

 

100,395

 

Operating lease assets

 

 

184,288

 

 

 

 

Goodwill

 

 

3,746,094

 

 

 

3,432,786

 

Amortizable intangible assets, net

 

 

916,768

 

 

 

898,807

 

Investments

 

 

27,378

 

 

 

17,394

 

Other assets

 

 

104,864

 

 

 

71,975

 

Total assets

 

$

7,622,821

 

 

$

6,688,668

 

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Premiums payable to insurance companies

 

$

1,014,317

 

 

$

857,559

 

Losses and loss adjustment reserve

 

 

58,505

 

 

 

65,212

 

Unearned premiums

 

 

366,021

 

 

 

337,920

 

Premium deposits and credits due customers

 

 

113,841

 

 

 

105,640

 

Accounts payable

 

 

99,960

 

 

 

87,345

 

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

 

 

337,717

 

 

 

279,310

 

Current portion of long-term debt

 

 

55,000

 

 

 

50,000

 

Total current liabilities

 

 

2,045,361

 

 

 

1,782,986

 

Long-term debt less unamortized discount and debt issuance costs

 

 

1,500,343

 

 

 

1,456,990

 

Operating lease liabilities

 

 

167,855

 

 

 

 

Deferred income taxes, net

 

 

328,277

 

 

 

315,732

 

Other liabilities

 

 

230,706

 

 

 

132,392

 

Shareholders’ Equity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock, par value $0.10 per share; authorized 560,000 shares; issued 297,106

   shares and outstanding 281,655 at 2019, issued 293,380

   shares and outstanding 279,583 shares at 2018 - in thousands.

 

 

29,711

 

 

 

29,338

 

Additional paid-in capital

 

 

716,049

 

 

 

615,180

 

Treasury stock, at cost at 15,451 at 2019 and 13,797 shares at 2018,

   respectively - in thousands

 

 

(536,243

)

 

 

(477,572

)

Retained earnings

 

 

3,140,762

 

 

 

2,833,622

 

Total shareholders’ equity

 

 

3,350,279

 

 

 

3,000,568

 

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

 

$

7,622,821

 

 

$

6,688,668

 

See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

46


Table of Contents

BROWN & BROWN, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

 

Common Stock

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands, except per share data)

 

Shares

 

 

Par

Value

 

 

Additional

Paid-In

Capital

 

 

Treasury

Stock

 

 

Retained

Earnings

 

 

Total

 

Balance at January 1, 2017

 

 

285,461

 

 

$

28,547

 

 

$

454,707

 

 

$

(257,683

)

 

$

2,134,640

 

 

$

2,360,211

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

399,630

 

 

 

399,630

 

Net unrealized holding (loss) gain on available-for-sale

   securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(47

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

41

 

 

 

(6

)

Common stock issued for employee stock benefit plans

 

 

1,412

 

 

 

140

 

 

 

39,825

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

39,965

 

Purchase of treasury stock

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(11,250

)

 

 

(128,639

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(139,889

)

Common stock issued to directors

 

 

22

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

498

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

500

 

Cash dividends paid ($0.28 per share)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(77,712

)

 

 

(77,712

)

Balance at December 31, 2017

 

 

286,895

 

 

 

28,689

 

 

 

483,733

 

 

 

(386,322

)

 

 

2,456,599

 

 

 

2,582,699

 

Adoption of Topic 606 at January 1, 2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

117,515

 

 

 

117,515

 

Beginning balance after adoption of Topic 606

 

 

286,895

 

 

 

28,689

 

 

 

483,733

 

 

 

(386,322

)

 

 

2,574,114

 

 

 

2,700,214

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

344,255

 

 

 

344,255

 

Net unrealized holding (loss) gain on available-for-sale

   securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(21

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(57

)

 

 

(78

)

Common stock issued for employee stock benefit plans

 

 

3,096

 

 

 

310

 

 

 

39,857

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

40,167

 

Common stock issued for agency acquisitions

 

 

3,376

 

 

 

338

 

 

 

99,662

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

100,000

 

Purchase of treasury stock

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(8,750

)

 

 

(91,250

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(100,000

)

Common stock issued to directors

 

 

13

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

699

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

700

 

Cash dividends paid ($0.31 per share)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(84,690

)

 

 

(84,690

)

Balance at December 31, 2018

 

 

293,380

 

 

 

29,338

 

 

 

615,180

 

 

 

(477,572

)

 

 

2,833,622

 

 

 

3,000,568

 

Net Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

398,514

 

 

 

398,514

 

Net unrealized holding (loss) gain on available-for-sale

   securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

182

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(30

)

 

 

152

 

Common stock issued for employee stock benefit plans

 

 

3,129

 

 

 

313

 

 

 

59,867

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

60,180

 

Common stock issued for agency acquisitions

 

 

569

 

 

 

57

 

 

 

19,943

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

20,000

 

Purchase of treasury stock

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

20,000

 

 

 

(58,671

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(38,671

)

Common stock issued to directors

 

 

28

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

877

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

880

 

Cash dividends paid ($0.33 per share)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(91,344

)

 

 

(91,344

)

Balance at December 31, 2019

 

 

297,106

 

 

$

29,711

 

 

$

716,049

 

 

$

(536,243

)

 

$

3,140,762

 

 

$

3,350,279

 

See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

47


Table of Contents

BROWN & BROWN, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

(in thousands)

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Cash flows from operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

398,514

 

 

$

344,255

 

 

$

399,630

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amortization

 

 

105,298

 

 

 

86,544

 

 

 

85,446

 

Depreciation

 

 

23,417

 

 

 

22,834

 

 

 

22,698

 

Non-cash stock-based compensation

 

 

46,994

 

 

 

33,519

 

 

 

30,631

 

Change in estimated acquisition earn-out payables

 

 

(1,366

)

 

 

2,969

 

 

 

9,200

 

Deferred income taxes

 

 

12,383

 

 

 

15,008

 

 

 

(102,183

)

Amortization of debt discount and disposal of deferred financing costs

 

 

2,054

 

 

 

1,627

 

 

 

1,840

 

Accretion of discounts and premiums, investments

 

 

(5

)

 

 

(10

)

 

 

22

 

(Gain)/loss on sales of investments, fixed assets and customer accounts

 

 

(9,550

)

 

 

(1,934

)

 

 

(1,841

)

Payments on acquisition earn-outs in excess of original estimated payables

 

 

(351

)

 

 

(12,538

)

 

 

(14,501

)

Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effect from acquisitions and

   divestitures:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Premiums, commissions and fees receivable (increase) decrease

 

 

(86,778

)

 

 

(93,630

)

 

 

(43,306

)

Reinsurance recoverables (increase) decrease

 

 

6,891

 

 

 

412,424

 

 

 

(399,737

)

Prepaid reinsurance premiums (increase) decrease

 

 

(28,101

)

 

 

(16,903

)

 

 

(12,356

)

Other assets (increase) decrease

 

 

(46,520

)

 

 

(22,440

)

 

 

(9,747

)

Premiums payable to insurance companies (increase) decrease

 

 

148,658

 

 

 

141,169

 

 

 

37,380

 

Premium deposits and credits due customers increase (decrease)

 

 

7,820

 

 

 

13,792

 

 

 

7,750

 

Losses and loss adjustment reserve increase (decrease)

 

 

(6,707

)

 

 

(411,509

)

 

 

398,638

 

Unearned premiums increase (decrease)

 

 

28,101

 

 

 

16,903

 

 

 

12,356

 

Accounts payable increase (decrease)

 

 

17,800

 

 

 

21,880

 

 

 

26,798

 

Accrued expenses and other liabilities increase (decrease)

 

 

43,330

 

 

 

22,801

 

 

 

25,509

 

Other liabilities increase (decrease)

 

 

16,298

 

 

 

(9,232

)

 

 

(32,252

)

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

 

678,180

 

 

 

567,529

 

 

 

441,975

 

Cash flows from investing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additions to fixed assets

 

 

(73,108

)

 

 

(41,520

)

 

 

(24,192

)

Payments for businesses acquired, net of cash acquired

 

 

(353,043

)

 

 

(923,874

)

 

 

(41,471

)

Proceeds from sales of fixed assets and customer accounts

 

 

21,592

 

 

 

4,984

 

 

 

4,094

 

Purchases of investments

 

 

(17,520

)

 

 

(9,284

)

 

 

(10,665

)

Proceeds from sales of investments

 

 

8,494

 

 

 

17,923

 

 

 

9,644

 

Net cash used in investing activities

 

 

(413,585

)

 

 

(951,771

)

 

 

(62,590

)

Cash flows from financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Payments on acquisition earn-outs

 

 

(9,566

)

 

 

(14,059

)

 

 

(29,265

)

Proceeds from long-term debt

 

 

350,000

 

 

 

300,000

 

 

 

 

Payments on long-term debt

 

 

(50,000

)

 

 

(120,000

)

 

 

(96,750

)

Deferred debt issuance costs

 

 

(3,701

)

 

 

(778

)

 

 

(2,821

)

Borrowings on revolving credit facilities

 

 

100,000

 

 

 

600,000

 

 

 

 

Payments on revolving credit facilities

 

 

(350,000

)

 

 

(250,000

)

 

 

 

Issuances of common stock for employee stock benefit plans

 

 

24,999

 

 

 

19,432

 

 

 

17,422

 

Repurchase of stock benefit plan shares for employees to fund tax withholdings

 

 

(10,933

)

 

 

(12,155

)

 

 

(7,565

)

Purchase of treasury stock

 

 

(58,671

)

 

 

(91,250

)

 

 

(128,639

)

Settlement (prepayment) of accelerated share repurchase program

 

 

20,000

 

 

 

(8,750

)

 

 

(11,250

)

Cash dividends paid

 

 

(91,344

)

 

 

(84,690

)

 

 

(77,712

)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

 

 

(79,216

)

 

 

337,750

 

 

 

(336,580

)

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents inclusive of

   restricted cash

 

 

185,379

 

 

 

(46,492

)

 

 

42,805

 

Cash and cash equivalents inclusive of restricted cash at beginning of period

 

 

777,596

 

 

 

824,088

 

 

 

781,283

 

Cash and cash equivalents inclusive of restricted cash at end of period

 

$

962,975

 

 

$

777,596

 

 

$

824,088

 

(in thousands, except per share data)December 31,
2016
 December 31,
2015
ASSETS   
Current Assets:   
Cash and cash equivalents$515,646
 $443,420
Restricted cash and investments265,637
 229,753
Short-term investments15,048
 13,734
Premiums, commissions and fees receivable502,482
 433,885
Reinsurance recoverable78,083
 31,968
Prepaid reinsurance premiums308,661
 309,643
Deferred income taxes24,609
 24,635
Other current assets50,571
 50,351
Total current assets1,760,737
 1,537,389
Fixed assets, net75,807
 81,753
Goodwill2,675,402
 2,586,683
Amortizable intangible assets, net707,454
 744,680
Investments23,048
 18,092
Other assets44,895
 35,882
Total assets$5,287,343
 $5,004,479
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY   
Current Liabilities:   
Premiums payable to insurance companies$647,564
 $574,736
Losses and loss adjustment reserve78,083
 31,968
Unearned premiums308,661
 309,643
Premium deposits and credits due customers83,765
 83,098
Accounts payable69,595
 63,910
Accrued expenses and other liabilities201,989
 192,067
Current portion of long-term debt55,500
 73,125
Total current liabilities1,445,157
 1,328,547
Long-term debt less unamortized discount and debt issuance costs1,018,372
 1,071,618
Deferred income taxes, net382,295
 360,949
Other liabilities81,308
 93,589
Commitments and contingencies (Note 13)   
Shareholders’ Equity:   
Common stock, par value $0.10 per share; authorized 280,000 shares; issued 148,107 shares and outstanding 140,104 shares at 2016, issued 146,415 shares and outstanding 138,985 shares at 201514,811
 14,642
Additional paid-in capital468,443
 426,498
Treasury stock, at cost 8,003 and 7,430 shares at 2016 and 2015, respectively(257,683) (238,775)
Retained earnings2,134,640
 1,947,411
Total shareholders’ equity2,360,211
 2,149,776
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity$5,287,343
 $5,004,479

See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.



BROWN & BROWN, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
 Common Stock        
(in thousands, except per share data)Shares Par Value Additional Paid-In Capital Treasury Stock Retained Earnings Total
Balance at January 1, 2014145,419 $14,542
 $371,960
 $
 $1,620,639
 $2,007,141
Net income   
  
   206,896
 206,896
Common stock issued for employee stock benefit plans442 44
 30,405
  
  
 30,449
Purchase of treasury stock   
  
 (75,025)   (75,025)
Income tax benefit from exercise of stock benefit plans   
 3,298
  
  
 3,298
Common stock issued to directors10 1
 319
  
  
 320
Cash dividends paid ($0.37 per share)   
  
   (59,334) (59,334)
Balance at December 31, 2014145,871 14,587
 405,982
 (75,025) 1,768,201
 2,113,745
Net income   
  
   243,318
 243,318
Common stock issued for employee stock benefit plans528 53
 27,992
  
  
 28,045
Purchase of treasury stock   
 (11,250) (163,750)   (175,000)
Income tax benefit from exercise of stock benefit plans   
 3,276
  
  
 3,276
Common stock issued to directors16 2
 498
  
  
 500
Cash dividends paid ($0.41 per share)   
  
   (64,108) (64,108)
Balance at December 31, 2015146,415 14,642
 426,498
 (238,775) 1,947,411
 2,149,776
Net income   
  
   257,491
 257,491
Common stock issued for employee stock benefit plans1,675 167
 22,851
  
  
 23,018
Purchase of treasury stock   
 11,250
 (18,908)   (7,658)
Income tax benefit from exercise of stock benefit plans   
 7,346
  
  
 7,346
Common stock issued to directors17 2
 498
  
  
 500
Cash dividends paid ($0.50 per share)   
  
   (70,262) (70,262)
Balance at December 31, 2016148,107 $14,811
 $468,443
 $(257,683) $2,134,640
 $2,360,211
See accompanying notes Refer to Consolidated Financial Statements.


BROWN & BROWN, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
 Year Ended December 31,
(in thousands)2016 2015 2014
Cash flows from operating activities:     
Net income$257,491
 $243,318
 $206,896
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:     
Amortization86,663
 87,421
 82,941
Depreciation21,003
 20,890
 20,895
Non-cash stock-based compensation16,052
 15,513
 19,363
Change in estimated acquisition earn-out payables9,185
 3,003
 9,938
Deferred income taxes18,163
 22,696
 7,369
Amortization of debt discount165
 157
 46
Amortization and disposal of deferred financing costs1,597
 
 
Accretion of discounts and premiums, investments39
 
 
Income tax benefit from exercise of shares from the stock benefit plans(7,346) (3,276) (3,298)
Loss/(gain) on sales of investments, fixed assets and customer accounts596
 (107) 42,465
Payments on acquisition earn-outs in excess of original estimated payables(3,904) (11,383) (2,539)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effect from acquisitions and divestitures:     
Restricted cash and investments (increase) decrease(35,884) 30,016
 (9,760)
Premiums, commissions and fees receivable (increase)(63,550) (7,163) (11,160)
Reinsurance recoverables (increase) decrease(46,115) (18,940) 12,210
Prepaid reinsurance premiums decrease (increase)982
 10,943
 (31,573)
Other assets (increase)(4,718) (5,318) (12,564)
Premiums payable to insurance companies decrease66,084
 542
 8,164
Premium deposits and credits due customers increase (decrease)527
 (2,973) 2,323
Losses and loss adjustment reserve increase (decrease)46,115
 18,940
 (12,210)
Unearned premiums (decrease) increase(982) (10,943) 31,573
Accounts payable increase30,174
 34,206
 36,949
Accrued expenses and other liabilities increase8,670
 8,204
 11,718
Other liabilities (decrease)(25,849) (23,898) (24,727)
Net cash provided by operating activities375,158
 411,848
 385,019
Cash flows from investing activities:     
Additions to fixed assets(17,765) (18,375) (24,923)
Payments for businesses acquired, net of cash acquired(122,622) (136,000) (696,486)
Proceeds from sales of fixed assets and customer accounts4,957
 10,576
 13,631
Purchases of investments(25,872) (22,766) (17,813)
Proceeds from sales of investments18,890
 21,928
 18,278
Net cash used in investing activities(142,412) (144,637) (707,313)
Cash flows from financing activities:     
Payments on acquisition earn-outs(24,309) (25,415) (9,530)
Proceeds from long-term debt
 
 1,048,425
Payments on long-term debt(73,125) (45,625) (330,000)
Borrowings on revolving credit facilities
 
 475,000
Payments on revolving credit facilities
 
 (475,000)
Income tax benefit from exercise of shares from the stock benefit plans7,346
 3,276
 3,298
Issuances of common stock for employee stock benefit plans15,983
 15,890
 14,808
Repurchase of stock benefit plan shares for employees to fund tax withholdings(8,495) (2,857) (3,252)
Purchase of treasury stock(18,908) (163,750) (75,025)
Settlement (prepayment) of accelerated share repurchase program11,250
 (11,250) 
Cash dividends paid(70,262) (64,108) (59,334)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities(160,520) (293,839) 589,390
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents72,226
 (26,628) 267,096
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period443,420
 470,048
 202,952
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$515,646
 $443,420
 $470,048
See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

BROWN & BROWN, INC.
Note 13 for reconciliation of cash and cash equivalents inclusive of restricted cash.

48


Table of Contents

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Nature of Operations

Brown & Brown, Inc., a Florida corporation, and its subsidiaries (collectively, “Brown & Brown” or the “Company”) is a diversified insurance agency, wholesale brokerage, insurance programs and servicesservice organization that markets and sells to its customers, insurance products and services, primarily in the property, casualty and casualty area.employee benefits areas. Brown & Brown’s business is divided into four4 reportable segments: thesegments. The Retail Segment provides a broad range of insurance products and services to commercial, public entity,and quasi-public, professional and individual customers; theinsured customers, and non-insurance risk-mitigating products through our automobile dealer services (“F&I”) businesses. The National Programs Segment, actingwhich acts as a managing general agent (“MGA”), provides professional liability and related package products for certain professionals, a range of insurance products for individuals, flood coverage, and targeted products and services designated for specific industries, trade groups, governmental entities and market niches, all of which are delivered through a nationwide networksnetwork of independent agents, andincluding Brown & Brown retail agents; theagents. The Wholesale Brokerage Segment markets and sells excess and surplus commercial and personal lines insurance, primarily through independent agents and brokers, as well as Brown & Brown Retail offices; and theretail agents. The Services Segment provides insurance-related services, including third-party claims administration and comprehensive medical utilization management services in both the workers’ compensation and all-lines liability arenas, as well as Medicare Set-aside services, Social Security disability and Medicare benefits advocacy services and claims adjusting services.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In November 2016,August 2018, the Financial Accountings Standards Board (“FASB”)FASB issued ASU 2018-15, “Intangibles—Goodwill and Other—Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-18, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230)for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract,: Restricted Cash (“ which provides guidance for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software (and hosting arrangements that include an internal-use software license).  ASU 2016-18”), which requires that the Statement of Cash Flows explain the changes during the period of cash2018-15 will take effect for public companies for fiscal years, and cash equivalents inclusive of amounts categorized as Restricted Cash. As such, upon adoption, the Company’s Statement of Cash Flows will show the sources and uses of cash that explain the movement in the balance of cash and cash equivalents, inclusive of restricted cash, over the period presented. ASU 2016-18 is effective forinterim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2017.

2019.  The impact of ASU 2018-15 is not expected to be material to the Company.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, “Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment.” The new guidance eliminates Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test. The updated guidance requires an entity to perform its annual or interim goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying value, and recognizing a non-cash impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value with the loss not exceeding the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. ASU 2017-04 will take effect for public companies for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019 and will be applied prospectively. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this guidance on future interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed.

Recently Adopted Accounting Standards

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, "Statement“Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230)": Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (a consensus of the Emerging Issues Task Force) ("(“ASU 2016-15"2016-15”), which addresses eight specific cash flow issues with the objective of reducing the existing diversity in practice in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified and applies to all entities, including both business entities and not-for-profit entities that are required to present a statement of cash flows under Topic 230. ASU 2016-15 will take effectbecame effective for public companies for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2017 andwith early adoption is permitted. The Company has evaluated the impact ofadopted ASU 2016-15 effective January 1, 2018 and has determined there is no impact on the impact to be immaterial.Company’s Statement of Cash Flows. The Company already presentspresented cash paid on contingent consideration in business combination as prescribed by ASU 2016-15 and does not, at this time, engage in the other activities being addressed.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, "Improvements to Employee Share Based Payment Accounting" ("ASU 2016-09"), which amends guidance issuedaddressed in Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 718, Compensation - Stock Compensation. ASU 2016-09 simplifies several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-09 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those fiscal years and early adoption is permitted. The Company has evaluated the impact of adoption of the ASU on its Consolidated Financial Statements. The principal impact will be that the tax benefit or expense from stock compensation will be presented in the income tax line of the Statement of Income rather than the current presentation as a component of equity on the Balance Sheet. Also the tax benefit or expense will be presented as activity in Cash Flow from Operating Activity rather than the current presentation as Cash Flow from Financing Activity in the Statement of Cash Flows. The Company will also continue to estimate forfeitures of stock grants as allowed by ASU 2016-09.
this ASU.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-08, "Principal“Principal Versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross Versus Net)" ("” (“ASU 2016-08"2016-08”) to clarify certain aspects of the principal-versus-agent guidance included in the new revenue standard ASU 2014-09 "Revenue“Revenue from Contracts with Customers" ("Customers” (“ASU 2014-09"2014-09”). The FASB issued the ASU in response to concerns identified by stakeholders, including those related to (1) determining the appropriate unit of account under the revenue standard’s principal-versus-agent guidance and (2) applying the indicators of whether an entity is a principal or an agent in accordance with the revenue standard’s control principle. The Company adopted ASU 2016-08 is effective contemporaneouscontemporaneously with ASU 2014-09 beginning January 1, 2018. The impact of ASU 2016-08 is currently being evaluated along with ASU 2014-09. At this point in our evaluation the potential impact would bewas limited to the claims administering activities of one of our businesses within our Services Segment and therefore was not material to the net income of the Company.

49


Table of Contents

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)” (“ASU 2016-02”Topic 842”), which provides guidance for accounting for leases.  Under ASU 2016-02,Topic 842, all leases are required to be recorded on the balance sheet and are classified as either operating leases or finance leases.  Effective as of January 1, 2019, the Company will be required to recognizeadopted Topic 842, and all related amendments, which established Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 842.  The Company adopted these standards by the recognition of right-of-use assets and related lease liabilities on the balance sheet. As permitted by Topic 842, the Company elected the transition practical expedient to adopt as of January 1, 2019, the date of initial application under the modified retrospective approach for leases existing at that date, with an adjustment to retained earnings. As a result, the rightsConsolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2018 was not restated and obligations created by leased assets. ASU 2016-02 will take effect for public companies for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company continues to evaluatebe reported under ASC Topic 840 (“Topic 840”) which did not require the recognition of operating lease liabilities on the balance sheet, and thus is not comparative.  For the year ended December 31, 2019, all of the Company’s leases are classified as operating leases, which are primarily real estate leases for office space.  The expense recognition for operating leases under Topic 842 is substantially consistent with Topic 840, where operating lease charges are recorded entirely in operating expenses.  As a result, there is no significant difference in the Company’s results of operations presented in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for each period presented.

The adoption of Topic 842 had a significant impact of this pronouncementon the Company’s balance sheet with the principalrecognition of the operating lease right-of-use asset and the liability for operating leases.  Upon adoption, leases that were classified as operating leases under Topic 840 were classified as operating leases under Topic 842.  For the adoption of Topic 842, the Company recorded an adjustment of $202.9 million to operating lease right-of-use asset and the related lease liability, with no impact being thatto retained earnings.  The deferred rent previously accrued under Topic 840 was reclassified to the right-of-use asset upon the adoption of Topic 842.  The lease liability is the present


value of the remaining minimum lease payments, be presented asdetermined under Topic 840, discounted using the Company’s incremental borrowing rate at the effective date of January 1, 2019.  As permitted under Topic 842, the Company elected to use the practical expedient that permits the Company to not reassess whether a liabilitycontract is or contains a lease, the classification of the Company’s existing operating leases, and initial direct costs for any existing leases. The Company did not elect the practical expedient to use hindsight in determining the lease term (when considering lessee options to extend or terminate the lease and to purchase the underlying asset) and in assessing impairment of the Company’s right-of-use assets. The application of the practical expedient did not have a significant impact on the Balance Sheetmeasurement of the operating lease liability.

The impact of the adoption of Topic 842 on the balance sheet at January 1, 2019 was (in thousands):

(in thousands)

 

Balance at

December 31, 2018

 

 

Adjustments due to Topic 842

 

 

Balance at

January 1, 2019

 

Balance Sheet

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other current assets

 

$

128,716

 

 

$

(3,004

)

 

$

125,712

 

Operating lease assets

 

 

 

 

 

178,304

 

 

 

178,304

 

Total Assets

 

 

6,688,668

 

 

 

175,300

 

 

 

6,863,968

 

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

 

 

279,310

 

 

 

13,836

 

 

 

293,146

 

Operating lease liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

161,464

 

 

 

161,464

 

Total Liabilities

 

 

3,688,100

 

 

 

175,300

 

 

 

3,863,400

 

For contracts entered into on or after the January 1, 2019, at the inception of a contract the Company assesses whether the contract is, or contains, a lease. This assessment is based on: (1) whether the contract involves the use of a distinct identified asset, (2) whether the Company obtains the right to substantially all the economic benefit from the use of the asset throughout the period, and (3) whether the Company has the right to direct the use of the asset. Leases entered into prior to January 1, 2019 are accounted for under Topic 840 and were not reassessed. For real estate leases that contain both lease and non-lease components, the Company elected to account the lease components together with non-lease components (e.g., common-area maintenance).

Leases are classified as well as an asset of similar value representing the “Right of Use” for those leased properties. As detailed in Note 13, the undiscounted contractual cash payments remaining on leased propertieseither finance leases or operating leases. A lease is $213 million as of December 31, 2016.

In November 2015, FASB issued ASU No. 2015-17, “Income Taxes (Topic 740) - Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes” (“ASU 2015-17”), which simplifies the presentation of deferred income taxes by requiring deferred tax assets and liabilities be classified as a single non-current itemfinance lease if any one of the following criteria are met: the lease transfers ownership of the asset by the end of the lease term, the lease contains an option to purchase the asset that is reasonably certain to be exercised, or the lease term is for a major part of the remaining useful life of the asset or the present value of the lease payments equals or exceeds substantially all of the fair value of the asset. A lease is classified as an operating lease if it does not meet any one of these criteria. None of the Company’s real estate leases for office space meet the definition of a finance lease. The Company’s policy is to own, rather than lease, equipment.

For leases at the lease commencement date, a right-of-use asset and a lease liability are recognized. The right-of-use asset represents the right to use the leased asset for the lease term. The right-of-use asset is initially measured at cost, which primarily comprises the initial amount of the lease liability, plus any initial direct costs incurred, less any lease incentives received. The lease liability is initially measured at the present value of the lease payments under the lease. For the Company’s operating leases, the lease payments are discounted using an incremental borrowing rate, which approximates the rate of interest that would be paid on a secured borrowing in an amount equal to the lease payments for the underlying asset under similar terms.

50


Table of Contents

Lease payments included in the measurement of the lease liability comprise the following: the fixed noncancelable lease payments, payments for optional renewal periods where it is reasonably certain the renewal period will be exercised, and payments for early termination options unless it is reasonably certain the lease will not be terminated early. Some of the Company’s real estate leases contain variable lease payments, including payments based on an index or rate. Variable lease payments based on an index or rate are initially measured using the index or rate in effect at lease commencement and based on the balance sheet. ASU 2015-17 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016 with early adoption permitted asminimum amount stated in the lease. Lease components are included in the measurement of the beginninginitial lease liability. Additional payments based on the change in an index or rate, or payments based on a change in the Company’s portion of the operating expenses, including real estate taxes and insurance, are recorded as a period expense when incurred. Lease modifications result in remeasurement of the right-of-use assets and the lease liability.

Lease expense for operating leases consists of the lease payments, inclusive of lease incentives, plus any interim or annual reporting period. initial direct costs, and is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Included in lease expense are any variable lease payments incurred in the period that were not included in the initial lease liability.

The Company planselected not to adopt ASU 2015-17 in the first quarter of 2017. This is not expected torecognize right-of-use assets and lease liabilities for short-term leases that have a material impacttotal term of 12 months or less. The effect of short-term leases on our Consolidated Financial Statements other than reclassifying current deferred tax assetsthe Company’s right-of-use asset and liabilities to non-current in the balance sheet.

lease liability would not be significant.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers”Customers (Topic 606)” (“ASU 2014-09”Topic 606”), which provides guidance for revenue recognition. ASU 2014-09Topic 606 affects any entity that either enters into contracts with customers to transfer goods or services or enters into contracts for the transfer of non-financial assets, andservices.  It supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Topic 605, “Revenue Recognition,” and most industry-specific guidance. The standard’s core principle is that a company willshould recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which a company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. In doing so, companies will needEffective as of January 1, 2018, the Company adopted ASU 2014–09, and all related amendments, which established ASC Topic 606. The Company adopted these standards by recognizing the cumulative effect as an adjustment to use more judgment and make more estimates thanopening retained earnings at January 1, 2018, under the current guidance. Specificallymodified retrospective method for contracts not completed as of the day of adoption. The cumulative impact of adopting Topic 606 on January 1, 2018 was an increase in retained earnings within stockholders’ equity of $117.5 million. Under the modified retrospective method, the Company was not required to restate comparative financial information prior to the adoption of these standards and, therefore, such information presented prior to January 1, 2018 continue to be reported under the Company’s previous accounting policies.

The following areas are impacted by the adoption of Topic 606:

The Company earns commissions and fees paid by insurance carriers for the binding of insurance coverage. These commissions and fees are earned at a point in time upon the effective date of bound insurance coverage, as no performance obligation exists after coverage is bound. If there are other services within the contract, the Company estimates the stand-alone selling price for each separate performance obligation, and the corresponding apportioned revenue is recognized over the period of time in which the customer receives the service, and as the performance obligations are fulfilled and the Company is entitled to that portion of revenue using the output method for the services. In situations where multiple performance obligations exist within thea contract, the use of estimates is required to allocate the transaction price on a relative stand-alone selling price basis to each separate performance obligation. Historically 70%

Commission revenues – Prior to the adoption of Topic 606, commission revenues, including those billed on an installment basis, were recognized on the latter of the policy effective date or morethe date that the premium was billed to the customer, with the exception of the Company’s revenue isArrowhead businesses, which followed a policy of recognizing these revenues on the latter of the policy effective date or processed date in our systems.  As a result of the formadoption of commissions paid by insurance carriers. CommissionTopic 606, commission revenues associated with the issuance of policies are earnednow recognized upon the effective date of bound coverage and nothe associated policy. The overall impact of these changes are not significant on a full-year basis, but the timing of recognizing revenue has impacted our fiscal quarters when compared to prior years. These commission revenues, including those billed on an installment basis, are now recognized earlier than they had been previously. Revenue is now accrued based upon the completion of the performance obligation, remainsthereby creating a current asset for the unbilled revenue, until such time as an invoice is generated, which typically does not exceed 12 months. For the year ended December 31, 2018, the adoption of Topic 606 increased base and incentive commissions revenue, as defined in those arrangements afterNote 2, by $9.9 million compared to what would have been recognized under the Company’s previous accounting policies. Incentive commissions represent a form of variable consideration which includes additional commissions over base commissions received from insurance carriers based on predetermined production levels mutually agreed upon by both parties.

Profit-sharing contingent commissions – Prior to the adoption of Topic 606, revenue that was not fixed and determinable because a contingency existed was not recognized until the contingency was resolved.  Under Topic 606, the Company must estimate the amount of consideration that will be received in the coming year such that a significant reversal of revenue is not probable.  Profit-sharing contingent commissions represent a form of variable consideration associated with the placement of coverage, is bound.for which we earn commissions and fees.  In connection with Topic 606, profit-sharing contingent commissions are estimated with a constraint applied and accrued relative to the recognition of the corresponding core commissions.  The resulting effect on the timing of recognizing profit-sharing contingent commissions will now more closely follow a similar pattern as our commissions and fees with any true-ups recognized when payments are received or as additional information that affects the estimate becomes available.  For the year ended December 31, 2018, the adoption of Topic 606 reduced profit-sharing contingent commissions revenue by $2.3 million compared to what would have been recognized under our previous accounting policies.

51


Table of Contents

Fee revenues – The Company is currently evaluating the approximately 30% ofearns fee revenue earned in the form of fees against the requirements of this pronouncement. Feesrelated to services other than securing insurance coverage, which are predominantly in ourthe Company’s National Programs and Services Segments, and to a lesser extent in the large accounts businessbusinesses within ourthe Company’s Retail Segment. AtSegment, where the conclusionCompany receives negotiated fees in lieu of this evaluation it may be determined thata commission. In accordance with Topic 606, fee revenue from certainfee agreements will beare recognized in earlier periods and others in later periods as compared to our previous accounting treatment depending on when the services within the contract are satisfied and when we have transferred control of the related services to the customer. The overall impact of these changes is not significant on a full-year basis, but the timing of recognizing fees revenue will impact our fiscal quarters when compared to prior years. For the year ended December 31, 2018, the adoption of Topic 606 increased fees revenue by $6.2 million compared to what would have been recognized under our previous accounting policies, including a one-time $10.5 million increase for revenues within our Services Segment. Excluding this increase, fee revenues would have decreased by $4.3 million.

Additionally, the Company has evaluated ASC Topic 340 – Other Assets and Deferred Cost (“ASC 340”) which requires companies to defer certain incremental cost to obtain customer contracts, and certain costs to fulfill customer contracts. 

Incremental cost to obtain – The adoption of ASC 340 resulted in the Company deferring certain costs to obtain customer contracts primarily as they relate to commission-based compensation plans in the Retail Segment, in which the Company pays an incremental amount of compensation on new business. These incremental costs are deferred and amortized over a 15-year period, which is consistent with the analysis performed on acquired customer accounts and referenced in Note 5 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements. For incremental costs with an amortization period of less than 12 months, the costs are expensed as incurred. For the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company deferred $13.7 million of incremental cost to obtain customer contracts. The Company expensed $0.5 million of the incremental cost to obtain customer contracts for the year ended December 31, 2018.

Cost to fulfill – The adoption of ASC 340 resulted in the Company deferring certain costs to fulfill contracts and to recognize these costs as the associated performance obligations are fulfilled. In order for contract fulfillment costs to be deferred under ASC 340, the costs must (1) relate directly to a specific contract or anticipated contract, (2) generate or enhance resources that the Company will use in satisfying its obligations under the new guidance in comparisoncontract, and (3) be expected to our current accounting policies and others will be recognized in later periods. Based uponrecovered through sufficient net cash flows from the work completed to date, managementcontract. The Company does not expect the overall impact of these changes to be significant.

ASU 2014-09 is effective forsignificant on a full-year basis, but the timing of recognizing these expenses will impact quarterly results compared to prior years as such recognition better aligns with the associated revenue. With the modified retrospective adoption of Topic 606, the Company beginningdeferred $52.7 million in contract fulfillment costs on its opening balance sheet on January 1, 2018 after FASB voted to delaybased upon the effective date by one year. At thatestimated average time spent on policy renewals. For the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company may adopthad net expense of $1.3 million related to the new standard underrelease of previously deferred contract fulfillment costs associated with performance obligations that were satisfied in the full retrospective approach orperiod, net of current year deferrals for costs incurred that related to performance obligations yet to be fulfilled.

In connection with the implementation of Topic 606 and ASC 340, we modified, retrospective approach.

Weand in some instances instituted, additional accounting procedures, processes and internal controls. While the relative impacts of these standards to our revenue and expense streams are significant during a calendar year, we do not anticipateview these modifications and additions as a material change in our internal control framework necessitated bycontrols over financial reporting on a full year basis.

The cumulative effect of the changes made to our consolidated balance sheet as of January 1, 2018 for the adoption of ASU 2014-09.Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” and ASC Topic 340 – Other Assets and Deferred Cost (the “New Revenue Standard”):

(in thousands)

 

Balance at

December 31, 2017

 

 

Adjustments

due to the

New Revenue

Standard

 

 

Balance at

January 1, 2018

 

Balance Sheet

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Premiums, commissions and fees receivable

 

$

546,402

 

 

$

153,058

 

 

$

699,460

 

Other current assets

 

 

47,864

 

 

 

52,680

 

 

 

100,544

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Premiums payable to insurance companies

 

 

685,163

 

 

 

12,107

 

 

 

697,270

 

Accounts payable

 

 

64,177

 

 

 

8,747

 

 

 

72,924

 

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

 

 

228,748

 

 

 

22,794

 

 

 

251,542

 

Deferred income taxes, net

 

 

256,185

 

 

 

44,575

 

 

 

300,760

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shareholders’ Equity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Retained earnings

 

$

2,456,599

 

 

$

117,515

 

 

$

2,574,114

 

The $52.7 million adjustment to other current assets reflects the deferral of certain cost to fulfill contracts. The $12.1 million adjustment to premiums payable to insurance companies reflects the estimated amount payable to outside brokers on unbilled premiums, commissions and fees

52


Table of Contents

receivable. The $8.7 million adjustment to accounts payable and the $22.8 million adjustment to accrued expenses and other liabilities consists of commissions payable and deferred revenue, respectively.

The following table illustrates the impact of adopting the New Revenue Standard has had on our reported results in the consolidated statement of income.

 

 

December 31, 2018

 

(in thousands)

 

As reported

 

 

Impact of adopting

the New Revenue

Standard

 

 

Balances without

the New Revenue

Standard

 

Statement of Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commissions and fees

 

$

2,009,857

 

 

$

18,399

 

 

$

1,991,458

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Employee compensation and benefits

 

 

1,068,914

 

 

 

(8,835

)

 

 

1,077,749

 

Other operating expenses

 

 

332,118

 

 

 

10,621

 

 

 

321,497

 

Income taxes

 

 

118,207

 

 

 

4,246

 

 

 

113,961

 

Net income

 

$

344,255

 

 

$

12,367

 

 

$

331,888

 

Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Brown & Brown, Inc. and its subsidiaries. All significant intercompany account balances and transactions have been eliminated in the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Segment results for prior periods have been recast, where appropriate, to reflect the current year segmental structure. Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior year amounts reported in this Annual Report on Form 10-K in order to conform to the current year presentation.

Revenue Recognition

Commission revenues

The Company earns commissions paid by insurance carriers for the binding of insurance coverage. Commissions are recognized as ofearned at a point in time upon the effective date of bound insurance coverage, as no performance obligation exists after coverage is bound. If there are other services within the contract, the Company estimates the stand-alone selling price for each separate performance obligation, and the corresponding apportioned revenue is recognized over a period of time as the performance obligations are fulfilled. The Company earns fee revenue by receiving negotiated fees in lieu of a commission and from services other than securing insurance policy orcoverage. Fee revenues from certain agreements are recognized depending on when the date on whichservices within the policy premium is processed into our systemscontract are satisfied and invoicedwhen we have transferred control of the related services to the customer, whichevercustomer. In situations where multiple performance obligations exist within a fee contract, the use of estimates is later. Commission revenues relatedrequired to installment billingsallocate the transaction price on a relative stand-alone selling price basis to each separate performance obligation. Incentive commissions represent a form of variable consideration which includes additional commissions over base commissions received from insurance carriers based on predetermined production levels mutually agreed upon by both parties. Profit-sharing contingent commissions represent a form of variable consideration associated with the placement of coverage, for which we earn commissions.  Profit-sharing contingent commissions and incentive commissions are recognizedestimated with a constraint applied and accrued relative to the recognition of the corresponding core commissions based on the latteramount of effective or invoiced date, withconsideration that will be received in the exceptioncoming year such that a significant reversal of our Arrowhead business which followsrevenue is not probable. Guaranteed supplemental commissions, a policyform of recognizing on the lattervariable consideration, represent guaranteed fixed-base agreements in lieu of effective or processed date into our systems, regardless of the billing arrangement. profit-sharing contingent commissions.

Management determines the policy cancellation reserve based upon historical cancellation experience adjusted for any known circumstances. Subsequent commission adjustments are recognized upon our receipt of notification from insurance companies concerning matters necessitating such adjustments. Profit-sharing contingent commissions are recognized when determinable, which is generally when such commissions are received from insurance companies, or when we receive formal notification of the amount of such payments. Fee revenues and commissions for workers’ compensation programs are recognized as services are rendered.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, as well as disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities, at the date of the Consolidated Financial Statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results may differ from those estimates.


Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents principally consist of demand deposits with financial institutions and highly liquid investments with quoted market prices having maturities of three months or less when purchased.

53


Table of Contents

Restricted Cash and Investments, and Premiums, Commissions and Fees Receivable

In our capacity as an insurance agent or broker, the Company typically collects premiums from insureds and, after deducting itsthe authorized commissions, remits the net premiums to the appropriate insurance company or companies. Accordingly, as reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, “premiums”premiums are receivable from insureds. Unremitted net insurance premiums are held in a fiduciary capacity until Brown & Brownthe Company disburses them. Where allowed by law, Brown & Brownthe Company invests these unremitted funds only in cash, money market accounts, tax-free variable-rate demand bonds and commercial paper held for a short term.short-term. In certain states in which Brown & Brownthe Company operates, the use and investment alternatives for these funds are regulated and restricted by various state laws and agencies. These restricted funds are reported as restricted cash and investments on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The interest income earned on these unremitted funds, where allowed by state law, is reported as investment income in the Consolidated Statement of Income.

In other circumstances, the insurance companies collect the premiums directly from the insureds and remit the applicable commissions to Brown & Brown.the Company. Accordingly, as reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, “commissions”commissions are receivables from insurance companies. “Fees”Fees are primarily receivables due from customers.

Investments

Certificates of deposit, and other securities, having maturities of more than three months when purchased are reported at cost and are adjusted for other-than-temporary market value declines.  The Company’s investment holdings include U.S. Government securities, municipal bonds, domestic corporate and foreign corporate bonds as well as short-duration fixed income funds.  Investments within the portfolio or funds are held as available for saleavailable-for-sale and are carried at their fair value.  Any gain/loss applicable from the fair value change is recorded, net of tax, as other comprehensive income within the equity section of the Consolidated Balance Sheet.Sheets.  Realized gains and losses are reported on the Consolidated Statement of Income, with the cost of securities sold determined on a specific identification basis.

Fixed Assets

Fixed assets, including leasehold improvements, are carried at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Expenditures for improvements are capitalized, and expenditures for maintenance and repairs are expensed to operations as incurred. Upon sale or retirement, the cost and related accumulated depreciation and amortization are removed from the accounts and the resulting gain or loss, if any, is reflected in other income. Depreciation has been determined using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets, which range from three3 to 15 years. Leasehold improvements are amortized on the straight-line method over the shorter of the useful life of the improvement or the term of the related lease.

Goodwill and Amortizable Intangible Assets

All of our business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001 are accounted for using the aquisitionacquisition method. Acquisition purchase prices are typically based upon a multiple of average annual EBITDA, operating profit and/or core revenue earned over a three-year period of 3 years within a minimum and maximum price range. The recorded purchase prices for all acquisitions consummated after January 1, 2009 include an estimation of the fair value of liabilities associated with any potential earn-out provisions. Subsequent changes in the fair value of earn-out obligations are recorded in the Consolidated Statement of Income when incurred.

The fair value of earn-out obligations is based upon the present value of the expected future payments to be made to the sellers of the acquired businesses in accordance with the provisions contained in the respective purchase agreements. In determining fair value, the acquired business’ future performance is estimated using financial projections developed by management for the acquired business and this estimate reflects market participant assumptions regarding revenue growth and/or profitability. The expected future payments are estimated on the basis of the earn-out formula and performance targets specified in each purchase agreement compared to the associated financial projections. These estimates are then discounted to present value using a risk-adjusted rate that takes into consideration the likelihood that the forecasted earn-out payments will be made.

Amortizable intangible assets are stated at cost, less accumulated amortization, and consist of purchased customer accounts and non-compete agreements. Purchased customer accounts and non-compete agreements are amortized on a straight-line basis over the related estimated lives and contract periods, which range from 3 to 15 years. Purchased customer accounts primarily consist of records and files that contain information about insurance policies and the related insured parties that are essential to policy renewals.

54


Table of Contents

The excess of the purchase price of an acquisition over the fair value of the identifiable tangible and amortizable intangible assets is assigned to goodwill. While goodwill is not amortizable, it is subject to assessment at least annually, and more frequently in the presence of certain circumstances, for impairment by application of a fair value-based test. The Company compares the fair value of each reporting unit with its carrying amount to determine if there is potential impairment of goodwill. If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value, an impairment loss is recorded to the extent that the fair value of the goodwill within the reporting unit is less than its carrying value.


Fair value is estimated based upon multiples of earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation, amortization and change in estimated acquisition earn-out payables (“EBITDAC”), or on a discounted cash flow basis. Brown & BrownThe Company completed its most recent annual assessment as of November 30, 20162019 and determined that the fair value of goodwill significantly exceeded the carrying value of such assets. In addition, as of December 31, 2016,2019, there are no0 accumulated impairment losses.

The carrying value of amortizable intangible assets attributable to each business or asset group comprising Brown & Brownthe Company is periodically reviewed by management to determine if there are events or changes in circumstances that would indicate that its carrying amount may not be recoverable. Accordingly, if there are any such changes in circumstances during the year, Brown & Brownthe Company assesses the carrying value of its amortizable intangible assets by considering the estimated future undiscounted cash flows generated by the corresponding business or asset group. Any impairment identified through this assessment may require that the carrying value of related amortizable intangible assets be adjusted. There were no0 impairments recorded for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014.

2017.

Income Taxes

Brown & Brown

The Company records income tax expense using the asset-and-liability method of accounting for deferred income taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial statement carrying values and the income tax bases of Brown & Brown’sthe Company’s assets and liabilities.

Brown & Brown

The Company files a consolidated federal income tax return and has elected to file consolidated returns in certain states. Deferred income taxes are provided for in the Consolidated Financial Statements and relate principally to expenses charged to income for financial reporting purposes in one period and deducted for income tax purposes in other periods.

Net Income Per Share

Basic EPSnet income per share is computed based uponon the weighted-averageweighted average number of common shares (including participating securities) issued and outstanding during the period. Diluted EPSnet income per share is computed based uponon the weighted-averageweighted average number of common shares issued and outstanding plus equivalent shares, assuming the exercise of stock options. The dilutive effect of stock options is computed by application of the treasury-stock method. The weighted average number of common shares outstanding for 2017 reflects the 2-for-1 stock split that occurred on March 28, 2018.

The following is a reconciliation between basic and diluted weighted-averageweighted average shares outstanding for the years ended December 31:

(in thousands, except per share data)

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017(1)

 

Net income

 

$

398,514

 

 

$

344,255

 

 

$

399,630

 

Net income attributable to unvested awarded

   performance stock

 

 

(12,873

)

 

 

(8,297

)

 

 

(9,746

)

Net income attributable to common shares

 

$

385,641

 

 

$

335,958

 

 

$

389,884

 

Weighted average number of common shares

   outstanding – basic

 

 

281,566

 

 

 

277,663

 

 

 

279,394

 

Less unvested awarded performance stock

   included in weighted average number of

   common shares outstanding – basic

 

 

(9,095

)

 

 

(6,692

)

 

 

(6,814

)

Weighted average number of common

   shares outstanding for basic earnings

   per common share

 

 

272,471

 

 

 

270,971

 

 

 

272,580

 

Dilutive effect of stock options

 

 

2,145

 

 

 

4,550

 

 

 

5,006

 

Weighted average number of shares

   outstanding – diluted

 

 

274,616

 

 

 

275,521

 

 

 

277,586

 

Net income per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

1.42

 

 

$

1.24

 

 

$

1.43

 

Diluted

 

$

1.40

 

 

$

1.22

 

 

$

1.40

 

(in thousands, except per share data)2016 2015 2014
Net income$257,491
 $243,318
 $206,896
Net income attributable to unvested awarded performance stock(6,705) (5,695) (5,186)
Net income attributable to common shares$250,786
 $237,623
 $201,710
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding – basic139,779
 141,113
 144,568
Less unvested awarded performance stock included in weighted-average number of common shares outstanding – basic(3,640) (3,303) (3,624)
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for basic earnings per common share136,139
 137,810
 140,944
Dilutive effect of stock options1,665
 2,302
 1,947
Weighted-average number of shares outstanding – diluted137,804
 140,112
 142,891
Net income per share:     
Basic$1.84
 $1.72
 $1.43
Diluted$1.82
 $1.70
 $1.41

(1)The weighted average number of common shares outstanding for 2017 reflects the 2-for-1 stock split that occurred on March 28, 2018.

55


Table of Contents

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying amounts of Brown & Brown’sthe Company’s financial assets and liabilities, including cash and cash equivalents; restricted cash and short-term investments; investments; premiums, commissions and fees receivable; reinsurance recoverable; prepaid reinsurance premiums; premiums payable to insurance companies; losses and loss adjustment reserve; unearned premium; premium deposits and credits due customers and accounts payable, at December 31, 20162019 and 2015,2018, approximate fair value because of the short-term maturity of these instruments. The carrying amount of Brown & Brown’sthe Company’s long-term debt approximates fair value at December 31, 20162019 and 20152018 as our fixed-rate borrowings of $598.8$848.7 million approximate their values using market quotes of notes with the similar terms as ours, which we deem a close approximation of current market rates. The estimated fair value of the $481.3$715.0 million remaining on the term loan under our Credit Facility (as defined below)currently outstanding approximates the carrying value due to the variable interest rate based upon adjusted LIBOR.  See Note 23 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for the fair values related to the establishment of intangible assets and the establishment and adjustment of earn-out payables.  See Note 56 for information on the fair value of investments and Note 89 for information on the fair value of long-term debt.


Non-CashStock-Based Compensation

The Company granted stock options and grants non-vested stock awards to its employees and officers and fully vested stock awards to directors. The Company uses the modified-prospective method to account for share-based payments. Under the modified-prospective method, compensation cost is recognized for all share-based payments granted on or after January 1, 2006 and for all awards granted to employees prior to January 1, 2006 that remained unvested on that date. The Company uses the alternative-transition method to account for the income tax effects of payments made related to stock-based compensation.

The Company uses the Black-Scholes valuation model for valuing all stock options and shares purchased under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”). Compensation for non-vested stock awards is measured at fair value on the grant date based upon the number of shares expected to vest. Compensation cost for all awards is recognized in earnings, net of estimated forfeitures, on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period.

Reinsurance

The Company protects itself from claims-related losses by reinsuring all claims risk exposure. The only line of insurance in which the Company underwritesacts in a risk-bearing capacity is flood insurance associated with the Wright National Flood Insurance Company (“WNFIC”), which is part of our National Programs Segment. However, all exposure is reinsured with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (“FEMA”) for basic admitted policies conforming to the National Flood Insurance Program. For excess flood insurance policies, all exposure is reinsured with a reinsurance carrier with an AM Best Company rating of “A” or better. Reinsurance does not legally discharge the ceding insurer from the primary liability for the full amount due under the reinsured policies. Reinsurance premiums, commissions, expense reimbursement and reserves related to ceded business are accounted for on a basis consistent with the accounting for the original policies issued and the terms of reinsurance contracts. Premiums earned and losses and loss adjustment expenses incurred are reported net of reinsurance amounts. Other underwriting expenses are shown net of earned ceding commission income. The liabilities for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses and unearned premiums are reported gross of ceded reinsurance recoverable.

Balances due from reinsurers on unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses, including an estimate of such recoverables related to reserves for incurred but not reported (“IBNR”) losses, are reported as assets and are included in reinsurance recoverable even though amounts due on unpaid loss and loss adjustment expense are not recoverable from the reinsurer until such losses are paid. The Company does not believe it is exposed to any material credit risk through its reinsurance as the reinsurer is FEMA for basic admitted flood policies and a national reinsurance carriercarriers for excessprivate flood policies, which has an AM Best Company rating of “A” or better. Historically, no0 amounts due from reinsurance carriers have been written off as uncollectible.

Unpaid Losses and Loss Adjustment Reserve

Unpaid losses and loss adjustment reserve include amounts determined on individual claims and other estimates based upon the past experience of WNFIC and the policyholders for IBNR claims, less anticipated salvage and subrogation recoverable. The methods of making such estimates and for establishing the resulting reserves are continually reviewed and updated, and any adjustments resulting therefrom are reflected in operations currently.

WNFIC engages the services of outside actuarial consulting firms (the “Actuaries”) to assist on an annual basis to render an opinion on the sufficiency of the Company’s estimates for unpaid losses and related loss adjustment reserve. The Actuaries utilize both industry experience and the Company’s own experience to develop estimates of those amounts as of year-end. These estimated liabilities are subject to the impact of future changes in claim severity, frequency and other factors. In spite of the variability inherent in such estimates, management believes that the liabilities for unpaid losses and related loss adjustment reserve isare adequate.

Premiums

Premiums from WNFIC are recognized as income over the coverage period of the related policies. Unearned premiums represent the portion of premiums written that relate to the unexpired terms of the policies in force and are determined on a daily pro rata basis. The income is recorded to the commissions and fees line of the income statement.

56


Table of Contents

NOTE 2 Revenues

The following tables present the revenues disaggregated by revenue source:

 

 

Twelve months ended December 31, 2019

 

(in thousands)

 

Retail

 

 

National

Programs

 

 

Wholesale

Brokerage

 

 

Services

 

 

Other(8)

 

 

Total

 

Base commissions(1)

 

$

994,170

 

 

$

338,058

 

 

$

242,380

 

 

$

 

 

$

(128

)

 

$

1,574,480

 

Fees(2)

 

 

246,135

 

 

 

151,298

 

 

 

56,852

 

 

 

193,641

 

 

 

(1,160

)

 

 

646,766

 

Incentive commissions(3)

 

 

80,505

 

 

 

(524

)

 

 

1,252

 

 

 

 

 

 

27

 

 

 

81,260

 

Profit-sharing contingent commissions(4)

 

 

34,150

 

 

 

17,517

 

 

 

7,499

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

59,166

 

Guaranteed supplemental commissions(5)

 

 

11,056

 

 

 

10,566

 

 

 

1,443

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

23,065

 

Investment income(6)

 

 

149

 

 

 

1,397

 

 

 

178

 

 

 

139

 

 

 

3,917

 

 

 

5,780

 

Other income, net(7)

 

 

1,096

 

 

 

72

 

 

 

483

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

1,654

 

Total Revenues

 

$

1,367,261

 

 

$

518,384

 

 

$

310,087

 

 

$

193,781

 

 

$

2,658

 

 

$

2,392,171

 

 

 

Twelve months ended December 31, 2018

 

(in thousands)

 

Retail

 

 

National

Programs

 

 

Wholesale

Brokerage

 

 

Services

 

 

Other(8)

 

 

Total

 

Base commissions(1)

 

$

811,820

 

 

$

324,168

 

 

$

226,117

 

 

$

 

 

$

(68

)

 

$

1,362,037

 

Fees(2)

 

 

148,121

 

 

 

144,195

 

 

 

50,571

 

 

 

189,041

 

 

 

(1,090

)

 

 

530,838

 

Incentive commissions(3)

 

 

48,698

 

 

 

1,543

 

 

 

864

 

 

 

 

 

 

41

 

 

 

51,146

 

Profit-sharing contingent commissions(4)

 

 

24,517

 

 

 

23,896

 

 

 

7,462

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

55,875

 

Guaranteed supplemental commissions(5)

 

 

8,535

 

 

 

76

 

 

 

1,350

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9,961

 

Investment income(6)

 

 

2

 

 

 

506

 

 

 

165

 

 

 

205

 

 

 

1,868

 

 

 

2,746

 

Other income, net(7)

 

 

1,070

 

 

 

79

 

 

 

485

 

 

 

 

 

 

9

 

 

 

1,643

 

Total Revenues

 

$

1,042,763

 

 

$

494,463

 

 

$

287,014

 

 

$

189,246

 

 

$

760

 

 

$

2,014,246

 

(1)

Base commissions generally represent a percentage of the premium paid by an insured and are affected by fluctuations in both premium rate levels charged by insurance companies and the insureds’ underlying “insurable exposure units,” which are units that insurance companies use to measure or express insurance exposed to risk (such as property values, or sales and payroll levels) to determine what premium to charge the insured. Insurance companies establish these premium rates based upon many factors, including loss experience, risk profile and reinsurance rates paid by such insurance companies, none of which we control.

(2)

Fee revenues relate to fees for services other than securing coverage for our customers, fees negotiated in lieu of commissions, and automotive finance and insurance products (“F&I”).

(3)

Incentive commissions include additional commissions over base commissions received from insurance carriers based on predetermined production levels mutually agreed upon by both parties.

(4)

Profit-sharing contingent commissions are based primarily on underwriting results, but may also reflect considerations for volume, growth and/or retention.

(5)

Guaranteed supplemental commissions represent guaranteed fixed-base agreements in lieu of profit-sharing contingent commissions.

(6)

Investment income consists primarily of interest on cash and investments.

(7)

Other income consists primarily of legal settlements and other miscellaneous income.

(8)

Fees within other reflects the elimination of intercompany revenues.

Contract Assets and Liabilities

The balances of contract assets and contract liabilities arising from contracts with customers as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 were as follows:

(in thousands)

 

December 31, 2019

 

 

December 31, 2018

 

Contract assets

 

$

289,609

 

 

$

265,994

 

Contract liabilities

 

$

58,126

 

 

$

53,496

 

Unbilled receivables (contract assets) arise when the Company recognizes revenue for amounts which have not yet been billed in our systems. Deferred revenue (contract liabilities) relates to payments received in advance of performance under the contract before the transfer of a good or service to the customer.

As of December 31, 2019, deferred revenue consisted of $41.2 million as current portion to be recognized within one year and $16.9 million in long-term to be recognized beyond one year. As of December 31, 2018, deferred revenue consisted of $37.0 million as current portion to be recognized within one year and $16.5 million in long-term deferred revenue to be recognized beyond one year.

57


Table of Contents

Contract assets and contract liabilities arising from acquisitions in 2019 were approximately $6.5 million and $9.3 million, respectively. Contract assets and contract liabilities arising from acquisitions in 2018 were approximately $34.3 million and $3.3 million, respectively.

During the twelve months ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, the amount of revenue recognized related to performance obligations satisfied in a previous period, inclusive of changes due to estimates, was approximately $17.2 million and $8.9 million, respectively.

Other Assets and Deferred Cost

Incremental cost to obtain – The Company defers certain costs to obtain customer contracts primarily as they relate to commission-based compensation plans in the Retail Segment, in which the Company pays an incremental amount of compensation on new business. These incremental costs are deferred and amortized over a 15-year period. The cost to obtain balance within the Other Assets caption in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets was $26.9 million and $13.2 million as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively. For the 12 months ended December 31, 2019, the Company deferred $15.1 million of incremental cost to obtain customer contracts. The Company expensed $1.4 million and $0.5 million of the incremental cost to obtain customer contracts for the 12 months ended December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively.

Cost to fulfill - The Company defers certain costs to fulfill contracts and recognizes these costs as the associated performance obligations are fulfilled. The cost to fulfill balance within the other current assets caption in the Company's Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets was $73.3 million and $69.8 million as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively. For the 12 months ended December 31, 2019, the Company had a net deferral of $1.0 million related to current year deferrals for costs incurred that relate to performance obligations yet to be fulfilled, net of the expense of previously deferred contract fulfillment costs associated with performance obligations that were satisfied in the period.

NOTE 3  Business Combinations

During the year ended December 31, 2016,2019, the Company acquired the assets and assumed certain liabilities of seven22 insurance intermediaries, all of the stock of one1 insurance intermediary and three4 books of businessbusinesses (customer accounts). Additionally, miscellaneous adjustments were recorded to the purchase price allocation of certain prior acquisitions completed within the last twelve12 months as permitted by Accounting Standards CodificationASC Topic 805 - Business Combinations (“ASC 805”). Such adjustments are presented in the “Other” category within the following two tables. All of these businesses were acquired primarily to expand Brown & Brown’s core business and to attract and hire high-quality individuals. The recorded purchase price for all acquisitions consummated after January 1, 2009 includedincludes an estimation of the fair value of liabilities associated with any potential earn-out provisions. Subsequent changes in the fair value of earn-out obligations will be recorded in the Consolidated Statement of Income when incurred.


The fair value of earn-out obligations is based upon the present value of the expected future payments to be made to the sellers of the acquired businesses in accordance with the provisions outlined in the respective purchase agreements. In determining fair value, the acquired business’s future performance is estimated using financial projections developed by management for the acquired business and reflects market participant assumptions regarding revenue growth and/or profitability. The expected future payments are estimated on the basis of the earn-out formula and performance targets specified in each purchase agreement compared to the associated financial projections. These payments are then discounted to present value using a risk-adjusted rate that takes into consideration the likelihood that the forecasted earn-out payments will be made.

Based upon the acquisition date and the complexity of the underlying valuation work, certain amounts included in the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements may be provisional and thus subject to further adjustments within the permitted measurement period, as defined in ASC 805. For the year ended December 31, 2016, several2019, adjustments were made within the permitted measurement period that resulted in a decrease in the aggregate purchase price of the affected acquisitions of $917,497$4.1 million relating to the assumption of certain liabilities. These measurement period adjustments have been reflected as current period adjustments for the year ended December 31, 20162019 in accordance with the guidance in ASU 2015-16 “Business Combinations.” The measurement period adjustments impacted goodwill, with no effect on earnings or cash in the current period.

Cash paid for acquisitions was $124.7$356.3 million and $136.0$934.9 million in the years ended December 31, 20162019 and 2015,2018, respectively. We completed eight23 acquisitions (excluding book of business purchases) during the year ended December 31, 2016.2019. We completed thirteen23 acquisitions (excluding book of business purchases) induring the twelve-month periodyear ended December 31, 2015.2018.

58


Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the purchase price allocations made as of the date of each acquisition for current year acquisitions and adjustments made during the measurement period for prior year acquisitions. During the measurement periods, the Company will adjust assets or liabilities if new information is obtained about facts and circumstances that existed as of the acquisition date that, if known, would have resulted in the recognition of those assets and liabilities as of that date. These adjustments are made in the period in which the amounts are determined and the current period income effect of such adjustments will be calculated as if the adjustments had been completed as of the acquisition date.

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Name

 

Business

segment

 

Effective

date of

acquisition

 

Cash

paid

 

 

Common

stock issued

 

 

Other

payable

 

 

Recorded

earn-out

payable

 

 

Net assets

acquired

 

 

Maximum

potential earn-

out payable

 

Smith Insurance Associates,

   Inc. (Smith)

 

Retail

 

February 1, 2019

 

$

20,129

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

2,704

 

 

$

22,833

 

 

$

4,550

 

Donald P. Pipino Company,

   LTD (Pipino)

 

Retail

 

February 1, 2019

 

 

16,420

 

 

 

 

 

 

135

 

 

 

9,821

 

 

 

26,376

 

 

 

12,996

 

AGA Enterprises, LLC d/b/a Cossio Insurance Agency (Cossio)

 

Retail

 

March 1, 2019

 

 

13,990

 

 

 

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

696

 

 

 

14,696

 

 

 

2,000

 

Medval, LLC (Medval)

 

Services

 

March 1, 2019

 

 

29,106

 

 

 

 

 

 

100

 

 

 

1,684

 

 

 

30,890

 

 

 

2,500

 

United Development Systems, Inc. (United)

 

Retail

 

May 1, 2019

 

 

18,987

 

 

 

 

 

 

388

 

 

 

3,268

 

 

 

22,643

 

 

 

8,625

 

Twinbrook Insurance Brokerage, Inc.

   (Twinbrook)

 

Retail

 

June 1, 2019

 

 

26,251

 

 

 

 

 

 

400

 

 

 

1,565

 

 

 

28,216

 

 

 

5,073

 

Innovative Risk Solutions, Inc. (IRS)

 

Retail

 

July 1, 2019

 

 

26,435

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,465

 

 

 

6,109

 

 

 

35,009

 

 

 

9,000

 

WBR Insurance Agency, LLC et al (WBR)

 

Retail

 

August 1, 2019

 

 

10,667

 

 

 

 

 

 

203

 

 

 

2,197

 

 

 

13,067

 

 

 

4,575

 

West Ridge Insurance Agency, Inc. d/b/a Yozell

   Associates (Yozell)

 

Retail

 

August 1, 2019

 

 

13,030

 

 

 

 

 

 

470

 

 

 

768

 

 

 

14,268

 

 

 

6,730

 

CKP Insurance, LLC (CKP)

 

Retail

 

August 1, 2019

 

 

89,190

 

 

 

20,000

 

 

 

4,000

 

 

 

38,093

 

 

 

151,283

 

 

 

76,500

 

Poole Professional Ltd. Insurance Agents and Brokers et al (Poole)

 

Retail

 

October 1, 2019

 

 

32,358

 

 

 

 

 

 

75

 

 

 

4,556

 

 

 

36,989

 

 

 

6,850

 

VerHagen Glendenning & Walker LLP (VGW)

 

Retail

 

October 1, 2019

 

 

23,032

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,498

 

 

 

2,385

 

 

 

26,915

 

 

 

8,170

 

Other

 

Various

 

Various

 

 

36,665

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,391

 

 

 

9,026

 

 

 

48,082

 

 

 

14,454

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

$

356,260

 

 

$

20,000

 

 

$

12,135

 

 

$

82,872

 

 

$

471,267

 

 

$

162,023

 

The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the aggregate assets and liabilities acquired as of the date of each acquisition and adjustments made during the measurement period of the prior year acquisitions.

(in thousands)

 

Smith

 

 

Pipino

 

 

Cossio

 

 

Medval

 

 

United

 

 

Twinbrook

 

 

IRS

 

 

WBR

 

 

Yozell

 

 

CKP

 

Cash

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

3,217

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

Other current assets

 

 

680

 

 

 

819

 

 

 

236

 

 

 

1,708

 

 

 

477

 

 

 

919

 

 

 

1,375

 

 

 

449

 

 

 

1,781

 

 

 

9,170

 

Fixed assets

 

 

39

 

 

 

112

 

 

 

29

 

 

 

50

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

85

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

193

 

Goodwill

 

 

16,042

 

 

 

16,765

 

 

 

10,010

 

 

 

19,108

 

 

 

15,111

 

 

 

18,935

 

 

 

24,938

 

 

 

9,096

 

 

 

8,904

 

 

 

110,495

 

Purchased customer accounts

 

 

6,500

 

 

 

11,360

 

 

 

4,403

 

 

 

7,300

 

 

 

7,065

 

 

 

8,557

 

 

 

8,800

 

 

 

4,022

 

 

 

3,550

 

 

 

32,274

 

Non-compete agreements

 

 

41

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

21

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

34

 

 

 

21

 

 

 

21

 

Other assets

 

 

 

 

 

772

 

 

 

 

 

 

15

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total assets acquired

 

 

23,302

 

 

 

29,839

 

 

 

14,699

 

 

 

31,399

 

 

 

22,684

 

 

 

28,508

 

 

 

35,135

 

 

 

13,611

 

 

 

14,268

 

 

 

152,153

 

Other current liabilities

 

 

(469

)

 

 

(3,463

)

 

 

(3

)

 

 

(480

)

 

 

(41

)

 

 

(292

)

 

 

(126

)

 

 

(166

)

 

 

 

 

 

(870

)

Other liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(29

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(378

)

 

��

 

 

 

 

Total liabilities assumed

 

 

(469

)

 

 

(3,463

)

 

 

(3

)

 

 

(509

)

 

 

(41

)

 

 

(292

)

 

 

(126

)

 

 

(544

)

 

 

 

 

 

(870

)

Net assets acquired

 

$

22,833

 

 

$

26,376

 

 

$

14,696

 

 

$

30,890

 

 

$

22,643

 

 

$

28,216

 

 

$

35,009

 

 

$

13,067

 

 

$

14,268

 

 

$

151,283

 

59


Table of Contents

(in thousands)

 

Poole

 

 

VGW

 

 

Other

 

 

Total

 

Cash

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

3,217

 

Other current assets

 

 

938

 

 

 

1,190

 

 

 

(6,786

)

 

 

12,956

 

Fixed assets

 

 

4

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

(130

)

 

 

455

 

Goodwill

 

 

28,233

 

 

 

16,595

 

 

 

34,314

 

 

 

328,546

 

Purchased customer accounts

 

 

10,359

 

 

 

9,092

 

 

 

15,020

 

 

 

128,302

 

Non-compete agreements

 

 

33

 

 

 

34

 

 

 

161

 

 

 

412

 

Other assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(732

)

 

 

55

 

Total assets acquired

 

 

39,567

 

 

 

26,931

 

 

 

41,847

 

 

 

473,943

 

Other current liabilities

 

 

(2,578

)

 

 

(16

)

 

 

6,235

 

 

 

(2,269

)

Other liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(407

)

Total liabilities assumed

 

 

(2,578

)

 

 

(16

)

 

 

6,235

 

 

 

(2,676

)

Net assets acquired

 

$

36,989

 

 

$

26,915

 

 

$

48,082

 

 

$

471,267

 

The weighted average useful lives for the acquired amortizable intangible assets are as follows: purchased customer accounts, 15 years; and non-compete agreements, 5 years.

Goodwill of $328.5 million, which is net of any opening balance sheet adjustments within the allowable measurement period, was allocated to the Retail, National Programs, Wholesale Brokerage and Services Segments in the amounts of $302.6 million, $0.1 million, $6.5 million and $19.3 million, respectively. Of the total goodwill of $328.5 million, the amount currently deductible for income tax purposes is $245.6 million and the remaining $82.9 million relates to the recorded earn-out payables and will not be deductible until it is earned and paid.

For the acquisitions completed during 2019, the results of operations since the acquisition dates have been combined with those of the Company. The total revenues from the acquisitions completed through December 31, 2019 included in the Consolidated Statement of Income for the year ended December 31, 2019 were $49.1 million. The income before income taxes, including the intercompany cost of capital charge, from the acquisitions completed through December 31, 2019 included in the Consolidated Statement of Income for the year ended December 31, 2019 was $3.4 million, excluding one acquisition from the third quarter of 2019 which recognizes primarily all of its revenues in the first quarter of each year. If the acquisitions had occurred as of the beginning of the respective periods, the Company’s results of operations would be as shown in the following table. These unaudited pro forma results are not necessarily indicative of the actual results of operations that would have occurred had the acquisitions actually been made at the beginning of the respective periods.

(UNAUDITED)

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

(in thousands, except per share data)

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Total revenues

 

$

2,447,401

 

 

$

2,120,867

 

Income before income taxes

 

$

545,182

 

 

$

496,076

 

Net income

 

$

412,974

 

 

$

369,277

 

Net income per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

1.47

 

 

$

1.33

 

Diluted

 

$

1.46

 

 

$

1.31

 

Weighted average number of shares outstanding:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

 

272,471

 

 

 

270,971

 

Diluted

 

 

274,616

 

 

 

275,521

 

60


Table of Contents

Acquisitions in 2018

During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company acquired the assets and assumed certain liabilities of 20 insurance intermediaries, all the stock of 3 insurance intermediaries and 1 book of business (customer accounts). Additionally, miscellaneous adjustments were recorded to the purchase price allocation of certain prior acquisitions completed within the last 12 months as permitted by ASC 805. Such adjustments are presented in the “Other” category within the following two tables.

For the year ended December 31, 2018, several adjustments were made within the permitted measurement period that resulted in an increase in the aggregate purchase price of the affected acquisitions of $21.4 thousand, relating to the assumption of certain liabilities.

The following table summarizes the purchase price allocation made as of the date of each acquisition for current year acquisitions and significant adjustments made during the measurement period for prior year acquisitions:

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Name

 

Business

segment

 

Effective

date of

acquisition

 

Cash

paid

 

 

Common

stock issued

 

 

Other

payable

 

 

Recorded

earn-out

payable

 

 

Net assets

acquired

 

 

Maximum

potential earn-

out payable

 

Opus Advisory

   Group, LLC (Opus)

 

Retail

 

February 1, 2018

 

$

20,400

 

 

$

 

 

$

200

 

 

$

2,384

 

 

$

22,984

 

 

$

3,600

 

Kerxton Insurance

   Agency, Inc. (Kerxton)

 

Retail

 

March 1, 2018

 

 

13,176

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,490

 

 

 

2,080

 

 

 

16,746

 

 

 

2,920

 

Automotive Development

   Group, LLC (ADG)

 

Retail

 

May 1, 2018

 

 

29,471

 

 

 

 

 

 

559

 

 

 

17,545

 

 

 

47,575

 

 

 

20,000

 

Servco Pacific,

   Inc. (Servco)

 

Retail

 

June 1, 2018

 

 

76,245

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

934

 

 

 

77,179

 

 

 

7,000

 

Tower Hill Prime

   Insurance Company

   (Tower Hill)

 

National Programs

 

July 1, 2018

 

 

20,300

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,188

 

 

 

21,488

 

 

 

7,700

 

Health Special

   Risk, Inc. (HSR)

 

National Programs

 

July 1, 2018

 

 

20,132

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,991

 

 

 

22,123

 

 

 

9,000

 

Professional Disability

   Associates, LLC (PDA)

 

Services

 

July 1, 2018

 

 

15,025

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9,818

 

 

 

24,843

 

 

 

17,975

 

Finance & Insurance

   Resources, Inc. (F&I)

 

Retail

 

September 1, 2018

 

 

44,940

 

 

 

 

 

 

410

 

 

 

9,121

 

 

 

54,471

 

 

 

19,500

 

Rodman Insurance

   Agency, Inc. (Rodman)

 

Retail

 

November 1, 2018

 

 

31,121

 

 

 

 

 

 

261

 

 

 

3,720

 

 

 

35,102

 

 

 

9,850

 

The Hays Group,

   Inc. et al (Hays)

 

Retail

 

November 16, 2018

 

 

605,000

 

 

 

100,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

19,600

 

 

 

724,600

 

 

 

25,000

 

Dealer Associates,

   Inc. (Dealer)

 

Retail

 

December 1, 2018

 

 

28,825

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,175

 

 

 

3,100

 

 

 

33,100

 

 

 

12,125

 

Other

 

Various

 

Various

 

 

30,293

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,367

 

 

 

5,896

 

 

 

37,556

 

 

 

12,998

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

$

934,928

 

 

$

100,000

 

 

$

5,462

 

 

$

77,377

 

 

$

1,117,767

 

 

$

147,668

 

(in thousands)               
NameBusiness
Segment
 Effective
Date of
Acquisition
 Cash
Paid
 Note Payable Other
Payable
 Recorded
Earn-Out
Payable
 Net Assets
Acquired
 Maximum
Potential Earn-
Out Payable
Social Security Advocates for the Disabled LLC (SSAD)Services February 1, 2016 $32,526
 $492
 $
 $971
 $33,989
 $3,500
Morstan General Agency, Inc. (Morstan)Wholesale Brokerage June 1, 2016 66,050
 
 10,200
 3,091
 79,341
 5,000
OtherVarious Various 26,140
 
 464
 400
 27,004
 7,785
Total    $124,716
 $492
 $10,664
 $4,462
 $140,334
 $16,285

61


Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the aggregate assets and liabilities acquired as of the date of each acquisition.acquisition and adjustments made during the measurement period of the prior year acquisitions.

(in thousands)

 

Opus

 

 

Kerxton

 

 

ADG

 

 

Servco

 

 

Tower Hill

 

 

HSR

 

 

PDA

 

 

F&I

 

 

Rodman

 

 

Hays

 

Cash

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

8,188

 

 

$

 

 

$

3,114

 

 

$

(248

)

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

Other current assets

 

 

1,215

 

 

 

663

 

 

 

1,500

 

 

 

7,769

 

 

 

 

 

 

818

 

 

 

1,762

 

 

 

999

 

 

 

1,062

 

 

 

36,254

 

Fixed assets

 

 

11

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

67

 

 

 

179

 

 

$

 

 

$

124

 

 

$

310

 

 

$

34

 

 

$

45

 

 

$

4,936

 

Goodwill

 

 

16,414

 

 

 

12,423

 

 

 

35,769

 

 

 

54,429

 

 

 

 

 

 

18,737

 

 

 

16,547

 

 

 

36,423

 

 

 

26,572

 

 

 

456,217

 

Purchased customer

   accounts

 

 

5,008

 

 

 

4,712

 

 

 

9,751

 

 

 

16,442

 

 

 

21,468

 

 

 

5,516

 

 

 

7,700

 

 

 

16,611

 

 

 

10,129

 

 

 

218,600

 

Non-compete

   agreements

 

 

21

 

 

 

22

 

 

 

21

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

65

 

 

 

82

 

 

 

21

 

 

 

51

 

 

 

2,600

 

Other assets

 

 

315

 

 

 

419

 

 

 

467

 

 

 

1,478

 

 

 

 

 

 

21

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

383

 

 

 

542

 

 

 

13,977

 

Total assets

   acquired

 

 

22,984

 

 

 

18,249

 

 

 

47,575

 

 

 

88,486

 

 

 

21,488

 

 

 

28,395

 

 

 

26,159

 

 

 

54,471

 

 

 

38,401

 

 

 

732,584

 

Other current liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

(1,503

)

 

 

 

 

 

(11,307

)

 

 

 

 

 

(5,930

)

 

 

(1,093

)

 

 

 

 

 

(3,299

)

 

 

(7,984

)

Other liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(342

)

 

 

(223

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total liabilities

   assumed

 

 

 

 

 

(1,503

)

 

 

 

 

 

(11,307

)

 

 

 

 

 

(6,272

)

 

 

(1,316

)

 

 

 

 

 

(3,299

)

 

 

(7,984

)

Net assets acquired

 

$

22,984

 

 

$

16,746

 

 

$

47,575

 

 

$

77,179

 

 

$

21,488

 

 

$

22,123

 

 

$

24,843

 

 

$

54,471

 

 

$

35,102

 

 

$

724,600

 

(in thousands)

 

Dealer

 

 

Other

 

 

Total

 

Cash

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

11,054

 

Other current assets

 

 

552

 

 

 

323

 

 

 

52,917

 

Fixed assets

 

 

13

 

 

 

100

 

 

 

5,829

 

Goodwill

 

 

21,467

 

 

 

22,712

 

 

 

717,710

 

Purchased customer accounts

 

 

10,986

 

 

 

15,085

 

 

 

342,008

 

Non-compete agreements

 

 

21

 

 

 

297

 

 

 

3,222

 

Other assets

 

 

226

 

 

 

754

 

 

 

18,588

 

Total assets acquired

 

 

33,265

 

 

 

39,271

 

 

 

1,151,328

 

Other current liabilities

 

 

(165

)

 

 

(1,715

)

 

 

(32,996

)

Other liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(565

)

Total liabilities assumed

 

 

(165

)

 

 

(1,715

)

 

 

(33,561

)

Net assets acquired

 

$

33,100

 

 

$

37,556

 

 

$

1,117,767

 

(in thousands)SSAD Morstan Other Total
Cash$2,094
 $
 $
 $2,094
Other current assets1,042
 2,482
 1,555
 5,079
Fixed assets307
 300
 77
 684
Goodwill22,352
 51,454
 19,570
 93,376
Purchased customer accounts13,069
 26,481
 11,075
 50,625
Non-compete agreements72
 39
 117
 228
Other assets
 
 20
 20
Total assets acquired38,936
 80,756
 32,414
 152,106
Other current liabilities(1,717) (1,415) (5,410) (8,542)
Deferred income tax, net(3,230) 
 
 (3,230)
Total liabilities assumed(4,947) (1,415) (5,410) (11,772)
Net assets acquired$33,989
 $79,341
 $27,004
 $140,334

The weighted-averageweighted average useful lives for the acquired amortizable intangible assets are as follows: purchased customer accounts, 15 years; and non-compete agreements, 5 years.


Goodwill of $93.4$717.7 million, which is net of any opening balance sheet adjustments within the allowable measurement period, was allocated to the Retail, National Programs, Wholesale Brokerage and Services Segments in the amounts of $13.1$676.9 million, $(1.2) thousand, $57.9$18.7 million, $5.5 million and $22.4$16.5 million, respectively. Of the total goodwill of $93.4$717.7 million, $88.9 million isthe amount currently deductible for income tax purposes. Thepurposes is $640.3 million and the remaining $4.5$77.4 million relates to the recorded earn-out payables and will not be deductible until it is earned and paid.

62


Table of Contents

For the acquisitions completed during 2016,2018, the results of operations since the acquisition dates have been combined with those of the Company. The total revenues from the acquisitions completed through December 31, 2016,2018 included in the Consolidated Statement of Income for the year ended December 31, 2016,2018 were $34.2$82.4 million. The income before income taxes, including the intercompany cost of capital charge, from the acquisitions completed through December 31, 2016,2018 included in the Consolidated Statement of Income for the year ended December 31, 2016,2018 was $4.3$6.3 million. If the acquisitions had occurred as of the beginning of the respective periods, the Company’s results of operations would be as shown in the following table. These unaudited pro forma results are not necessarily indicative of the actual results of operations that would have occurred had the acquisitions actually been made at the beginning of the respective periods.

(UNAUDITED)

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

(in thousands, except per share data)

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Total revenues

 

$

2,259,812

 

 

$

2,193,169

 

Income before income taxes

 

$

504,664

 

 

$

503,927

 

Net income

 

$

375,670

 

 

$

447,796

 

Net income per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

1.35

 

 

$

1.60

 

Diluted

 

$

1.33

 

 

$

1.57

 

Weighted average number of shares outstanding:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

 

270,971

 

 

 

272,580

 

Diluted

 

 

275,521

 

 

 

277,586

 

(UNAUDITED)For the Year Ended December 31, 
(in thousands, except per share data)2016 2015
Total revenues$1,789,790
 $1,716,592
Income before income taxes$428,194
 $414,911
Net income$260,346
 $250,783
Net income per share:   
Basic$1.86
 $1.78
Diluted$1.84
 $1.75
weighted-average number of shares outstanding:   
Basic136,139
 137,810
Diluted137,804
 140,112

Acquisitions in 2015

2017

During the year ended December 31, 2015, Brown & Brown2017, the Company acquired the assets and assumed certain liabilities of thirteen11 insurance intermediaries and four books1 book of business (customer accounts). The cash paid for these acquisitions was $136.0 million. Additionally, miscellaneous adjustments were recorded to the purchase price allocation of certain prior acquisitions completed within the last twelve12 months as permitted by Accounting Standards Codification Topic 805 — Business Combinations (“ASC 805”).805. Such adjustments are presented in ‘Other’the “Other” category within the following two tables. All of these businesses were acquired primarily to expand Brown & Brown’s core business and to attract and hire high-quality individuals.

For the year ended December 31, 2015,2017, several adjustments were made within the permitted measurement period that resulted in a decrease in the aggregate purchase price of the affected acquisitions of $503,442$1.5 million, relating to the assumption of certain liabilities.


The following table summarizes the purchase price allocation made as of the date of each acquisition for current year acquisitions and significant adjustments made during the measurement period for prior year acquisitions:

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Name

 

Business

segment

 

Effective

date of

acquisition

 

Cash

paid

 

 

Other

payable

 

 

Recorded

earn-out

payable

 

 

Net assets

acquired

 

 

Maximum

potential earn-

out payable

 

Other

 

Various

 

Various

 

$

41,471

 

 

$

11,708

 

 

$

6,921

 

 

$

60,100

 

 

$

27,451

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

$

41,471

 

 

$

11,708

 

 

$

6,921

 

 

$

60,100

 

 

$

27,451

 

(in thousands)             
Name
Business
Segment
 
Effective
Date of
Acquisition
 
Cash
Paid
 
Other
Payable
 
Recorded
Earn-Out
Payable
 
Net Assets
Acquired
 
Maximum
Potential Earn-
Out Payable
Liberty Insurance Brokers, Inc. and Affiliates (Liberty)Retail February 1, 2015 $12,000
 $
 $2,981
 $14,981
 $3,750
Spain Agency, Inc. (Spain)Retail March 1, 2015 20,706
 
 2,617
 23,323
 9,162
Bellingham Underwriters, Inc. (Bellingham)National Programs May 1, 2015 9,007
 500
 3,322
 12,829
 4,400
Fitness Insurance, LLC (Fitness)Retail June 1, 2015 9,455
 
 2,379
 11,834
 3,500
Strategic Benefit Advisors, Inc. (SBA)Retail June 1, 2015 49,600
 400
 13,587
 63,587
 26,000
Bentrust Financial, Inc. (Bentrust)Retail December 1, 2015 10,142
 391
 319
 10,852
 2,200
MBA Insurance Agency of Arizona, Inc. (MBA)Retail December 1, 2015 68
 8,442
 6,063
 14,573
 9,500
Smith Insurance, Inc. (Smith)Retail December 1, 2015 12,096
 200
 1,047
 13,343
 6,350
OtherVarious Various 12,926
 95
 4,584
 17,605
 8,212
Total    $136,000
 $10,028
 $36,899
 $182,927
 $73,074

The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the aggregate assets and liabilities acquired as of the date of each acquisition.

(in thousands)

 

Total

 

Other current assets

 

$

601

 

Fixed assets

 

 

69

 

Goodwill

 

 

42,172

 

Purchased customer accounts

 

 

18,738

 

Non-compete agreements

 

 

721

 

Total assets acquired

 

 

62,301

 

Other current liabilities

 

 

(1,512

)

Deferred income tax, net

 

 

(689

)

Total liabilities assumed

 

 

(2,201

)

Net assets acquired

 

$

60,100

 

The data included in the ‘Other’ column shows a negative adjustment for purchased customer accounts. This is driven mainly by the final valuation adjustment for the acquisition of Wright.

(in thousands)Liberty Spain Bellingham Fitness SBA Bentrust MBA Smith Other Total
Other current assets$2,486
 $324
 $
 $9
 $652
 $
 $
 $
 $169
 $3,640
Fixed assets40
 50
 25
 17
 41
 36
 33
 73
 59
 374
Goodwill10,010
 15,748
 9,608
 8,105
 39,859
 8,166
 13,471
 10,374
 21,040
 136,381
Purchased customer accounts4,506
 7,430
 3,223
 3,715
 23,000
 2,789
 7,338
 3,526
 (2,135) 53,392
Non-compete agreements24
 21
 21
 
 21
 43
 11
 31
 156
 328
Other assets
 
 
 
 14
 
 
 
 
 14
Total assets acquired17,066
 23,573
 12,877
 11,846
 63,587
 11,034
 20,853
 14,004
 19,289
 194,129
Other current liabilities(42) (250) (48) (12) 
 (182) (6,280) (504) (4,895) (12,213)
Deferred income tax, net
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 2,576
 2,576
Other liabilities(2,043) 
 
 
 
 
 
 (157) 635
 (1,565)
Total liabilities assumed(2,085) (250) (48) (12) 
 (182) (6,280) (661) (1,684) (11,202)
Net assets acquired$14,981
 $23,323
 $12,829
 $11,834
 $63,587
 $10,852
 $14,573
 $13,343
 $17,605
 $182,927
The weighted-averageweighted average useful lives for the acquired amortizable intangible assets are as follows: purchased customer accounts, 15 years; and non-compete agreements, 5 years.

Goodwill of $136.4$42.2 million was allocated to the Retail, National Programs, and Wholesale Brokerage and Services Segments in the amounts of $113.8$33.1 million, $18.0$7.2 million, $1.2 million and $4.6$0.7 million, respectively. Of the total goodwill of $136.4$42.2 million, $91.1$35.3 million is currently deductible for income tax purposes and $8.4 million is non-deductible.purposes. The remaining $36.9$6.9 million relates to the recorded earn-out payables and will not be deductible until it is earned and paid.


63


Table of Contents

For the acquisitions completed during 2015,2017, the results of operations since the acquisition dates have been combined with those of the Company. The total revenues from the acquisitions completed through December 31, 2015,2017 included in the Consolidated Statement of Income for the year ended December 31, 2015,2017 were $28.2$7.8 million. The income before income taxes, including the intercompany cost of capital charge, from the acquisitions completed through December 31, 2015,2017 included in the Consolidated Statement of Income for the year ended December 31, 2015,2017 was $1.5$2.4 million. If the acquisitions had occurred as of the beginning of the respective periods, the Company’s results of operations would be as shown in the following table. These unaudited pro forma results are not necessarily indicative of the actual results of operations that would have occurred had the acquisitions actually been made at the beginning of the respective periods.

(UNAUDITED)

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

(in thousands, except per share data)

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Total revenues

 

$

1,891,701

 

 

$

1,784,776

 

Income before income taxes

 

$

453,397

 

 

$

429,490

 

Net income

 

$

401,908

 

 

$

261,133

 

Net income per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

1.44

 

 

$

0.93

 

Diluted

 

$

1.41

 

 

$

0.92

 

Weighted average number of shares outstanding:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

 

272,580

 

 

 

272,278

 

Diluted

 

 

277,586

 

 

 

275,608

 

(UNAUDITED)For the Year Ended December 31, 
(in thousands, except per share data)2015 2014
Total revenues$1,688,297
 $1,630,992
Income before income taxes$411,497
 $356,426
Net income$248,720
 $217,053
Net income per share:   
Basic$1.76
 $1.50
Diluted$1.73
 $1.48
weighted-average number of shares outstanding:   
Basic137,810
 140,944
Diluted140,112
 142,891
Acquisitions in 2014
During the year ended December 31, 2014, Brown & Brown acquired the assets and assumed certain liabilities of nine insurance intermediaries, all of the stock of one insurance intermediary that owns an insurance carrier and five books of business (customer accounts). The cash paid for these acquisitions was $721.9 million. Additionally, miscellaneous adjustments were recorded to the purchase price allocation of certain prior acquisitions completed within the last twelve months as permitted by Accounting Standards Codification Topic 805 — Business Combinations (“ASC 805”). Such adjustments are presented in the “Other” category within the following two tables. All of these acquisitions were acquired primarily to expand Brown & Brown’s core business and to attract and hire high-quality individuals.
For the year ended December 31, 2014, several adjustments were made within the permitted measurement period that resulted in a decrease in the aggregate purchase price of the affected acquisitions of $25,941 relating to the assumption of certain liabilities.
The following table summarizes the purchase price allocation made as of the date of each acquisition for current year acquisitions and significant adjustment made during the measurement period for prior year acquisitions:
(in thousands)             
Name
Business
Segment
 
Effective
Date of
Acquisition
 
Cash
Paid
 
Other
Payable
 
Recorded
Earn-Out
Payable
 
Net Assets
Acquired
 
Maximum
Potential Earn-
Out Payable
The Wright Insurance Group, LLC (Wright)National Programs May 1, 2014 $609,183
 $1,471
 $
 $610,654
 $
Pacific Resources Benefits Advisors, LLC (PacRes)Retail May 1, 2014 90,000
 
 27,452
 117,452
 35,000
Axia Strategies, Inc (Axia)Wholesale Brokerage May 1, 2014 9,870
 
 1,824
 11,694
 5,200
OtherVarious Various 12,798
 433
 3,953
 17,184
 9,262
Total    $721,851
 $1,904
 $33,229
 $756,984
 $49,462

The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the aggregate assets and liabilities acquired as of the date of each acquisition.
(in thousands)Wright PacRes Axia Other Total
Cash$25,365
 $
 $
 $
 $25,365
Other current assets16,474
 3,647
 101
 742
 20,964
Fixed assets7,172
 53
 24
 1,724
 8,973
Reinsurance recoverable25,238
 
 
 
 25,238
Prepaid reinsurance premiums289,013
 
 
 
 289,013
Goodwill420,209
 76,023
 7,276
 10,417
 513,925
Purchased customer accounts213,677
 38,111
 4,252
 4,384
 260,424
Non-compete agreements966
 21
 41
 166
 1,194
Other assets20,045
 
 
 
 20,045
Total assets acquired1,018,159
 117,855
 11,694
 17,433
 1,165,141
Other current liabilities(14,322) (403) 
 (249) (14,974)
Losses and loss adjustment reserve(25,238) 
 
 
 (25,238)
Unearned premiums(289,013) 
 
 
 (289,013)
Deferred income tax, net(46,566) 
 
 
 (46,566)
Other liabilities(32,366) 
 
 
 (32,366)
Total liabilities assumed(407,505) (403) 
 (249) (408,157)
Net assets acquired$610,654
 $117,452
 $11,694
 $17,184
 $756,984
The weighted-average useful lives for the acquired amortizable intangible assets are as follows: purchased customer accounts, 15 years; and non-compete agreements, 3.4 years.
Goodwill of $513.9 million was allocated to the Retail, National Programs, Wholesale Brokerage and Services Segments in the amounts of $86.4 million, $420.0 million, $7.7 million and $(0.2) million, respectively. Of the total goodwill of $513.9 million, $141.9 million is currently deductible for income tax purposes and $338.8 million is non-deductible. The remaining $33.2 million relates to the recorded earn-out payables and will not be deductible until it is earned and paid.
For the acquisitions completed during 2014, the results of operations since the acquisition dates have been combined with those of the Company. The total revenues and income before income taxes, including the intercompany cost of capital, from the acquisitions completed through December 31, 2014, included in the Consolidated Statement of Income for the year ended December 31, 2014, were $112.2 million and $(1.3) million, respectively. If the acquisitions had occurred as of the beginning of the respective periods, the Company’s results of operations would be as shown in the following table. These unaudited pro forma results are not necessarily indicative of the actual results of operations that would have occurred had the acquisitions actually been made at the beginning of the respective periods.
(UNAUDITED)For the Year Ended December 31, 
(in thousands, except per share data)2014 2013
Total revenues$1,630,162
 $1,520,858
Income before income taxes$358,229
 $409,522
Net income$218,150
 $248,628
Net income per share:   
Basic$1.51
 $1.72
Diluted$1.49
 $1.70
Weighted-average number of shares outstanding:   
Basic140,944
 141,033
Diluted142,891
 142,624

As of December 31, 2016,2019, the maximum future contingency payments related to all acquisitions totaled $117.2$328.7 million, all of which relates to acquisitions consummated subsequent to January 1, 2009.

ASC Topic 805-Business Combinations805 is the authoritative guidance requiring an acquirer to recognize 100% of the fair values of acquired assets, including goodwill, and assumed liabilities (with only limited exceptions) upon initially obtaining control of an acquired entity. Additionally, the fair value of contingent consideration arrangements (such as earn-out purchase arrangements) at the acquisition date must be included in the purchase price consideration. As a result, the recorded purchase prices for all acquisitions consummated after January 1, 2009


include an estimation of the fair value of liabilities associated with any potential earn-out provisions. Subsequent changes in these earn-out obligations will be recorded in the Consolidated Statement of Income when incurred. Potential earn-out obligations are typically based upon future earnings of the acquired entities, usually between one and three years.

As of December 31, 2016,2019, the fair values of the estimated acquisition earn-out payables were re-evaluated and measured at fair value on a recurring basis using unobservable inputs (Level 3) as defined in ASC 820-Fair Value Measurement. The resulting additions, payments and net changes, as well as the interest expense accretion on the estimated acquisition earn-out payables, for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 20142017 were as follows:

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

(in thousands)

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Balance as of the beginning of the period

 

$

89,924

 

 

$

36,175

 

 

$

63,821

 

Additions to estimated acquisition earn-out payables from new acquisitions

 

 

82,872

 

 

 

77,377

 

 

 

6,920

 

Payments for estimated acquisition earn-out payables

 

 

(9,917

)

 

 

(26,597

)

 

 

(43,766

)

Subtotal

 

 

162,879

 

 

 

86,955

 

 

 

26,975

 

Net change in earnings from estimated acquisition earn-out

   payables:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in fair value on estimated acquisition earn-out

   payables

 

 

(7,298

)

 

 

603

 

 

 

6,874

 

Interest expense accretion

 

 

5,932

 

 

 

2,366

 

 

 

2,326

 

Net change in earnings from estimated acquisition earn-

   out payables

 

 

(1,366

)

 

 

2,969

 

 

 

9,200

 

Balance as of December 31,

 

$

161,513

 

 

$

89,924

 

 

$

36,175

 

 For the Year Ended December 31, 
(in thousands)2016 2015 2014
Balance as of the beginning of the period$78,387
 $75,283
 $43,058
Additions to estimated acquisition earn-out payables4,462
 36,899
 34,356
Payments for estimated acquisition earn-out payables(28,213) (36,798) (12,069)
Subtotal54,636
 75,384
 65,345
Net change in earnings from estimated acquisition earn-out payables:     
Change in fair value on estimated acquisition earn-out payables6,338
 13
 7,375
Interest expense accretion2,847
 2,990
 2,563
Net change in earnings from estimated acquisition earn-out payables9,185
 3,003
 9,938
Balance as of December 31,$63,821
 $78,387
 $75,283

Of the $63.8$161.5 million of estimated acquisition earn-out payables as of December 31, 2016, $31.82019, $17.9 million was recorded as accounts payable, and $32.0$143.6 million was recorded as otheranother non-current liabilities.liability. Included within additions to estimated acquisition earn-out payables are any adjustments to opening balance sheet items prior to the one-year anniversary date of the acquisition and may therefore differ from previously reported amounts. Of the $78.4$89.9 million of estimated acquisition earn-out payables as of December 31, 2015, $25.32018, $21.1 million was recorded as accounts payable, and $53.1$68.8 million was recorded as other non-current liabilities. Of the $75.3$36.2 million of estimated acquisition earn-out payables as of December 31, 2014, $26.02017, $25.1 million was recorded as accounts payable, and $49.3$11.1 million was recorded as an other non-current liability.

liabilities.

64


Table of Contents

NOTE 4  Goodwill

The changes in the carrying value of goodwill by reportable segment for the years ended December 31, are as follows:

(in thousands)

 

Retail

 

 

National

Programs

 

 

Wholesale

Brokerage

 

 

Services

 

 

Total

 

Balance as of January 1, 2018

 

$

1,386,248

 

 

$

908,472

 

 

$

286,098

 

 

$

135,261

 

 

$

2,716,079

 

Goodwill of acquired businesses

 

 

676,902

 

 

 

18,737

 

 

 

5,524

 

 

 

16,547

 

 

 

717,710

 

Goodwill disposed of relating to sales of businesses

 

 

 

 

 

(1,003

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,003

)

Balance as of December 31, 2018

 

$

2,063,150

 

 

$

926,206

 

 

$

291,622

 

 

$

151,808

 

 

$

3,432,786

 

Goodwill of acquired businesses

 

 

302,640

 

 

 

74

 

 

 

6,479

 

 

 

19,353

 

 

 

328,546

 

Goodwill disposed of relating to sales of businesses

 

 

(14,499

)

 

 

(739

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(15,238

)

Balance as of December 31, 2019

 

$

2,351,291

 

 

$

925,541

 

 

$

298,101

 

 

$

171,161

 

 

$

3,746,094

 

(in thousands)Retail 
National
Programs
 
Wholesale
Brokerage
 Services Total
Balance as of January 1, 2015$1,231,869
 $886,095
 $222,356
 $120,291
 $2,460,611
Goodwill of acquired businesses113,767
 18,009
 4,605
 
 136,381
Goodwill disposed of relating to sales of businesses
 (2,238) 
 (8,071) (10,309)
Balance as of December 31, 2015$1,345,636
 $901,866
 $226,961
 $112,220
 $2,586,683
Goodwill of acquired businesses13,117
 (1) 57,908
 22,352
 93,376
Goodwill of transferred businesses571
 (571) 
 
 
Goodwill disposed of relating to sales of businesses(4,657) 
 
 
 (4,657)
Balance as of December 31, 2016$1,354,667
 $901,294
 $284,869
 $134,572
 $2,675,402

NOTE 5 Amortizable Intangible Assets

Amortizable intangible assets at December 31, 20162019 and 20152018 consisted of the following:

 

 

December 31, 2019

 

 

December 31, 2018

 

(in thousands)

 

Gross

carrying

value

 

 

Accumulated

amortization

 

 

Net

carrying

value

 

 

Weighted

average

life in

years(1)

 

 

Gross

carrying

value

 

 

Accumulated

amortization

 

 

Net

carrying

value

 

 

Weighted

average

life in

years(1)

 

Purchased customer accounts

 

$

1,925,326

 

 

$

(1,011,574

)

 

$

913,752

 

 

 

15.0

 

 

$

1,804,404

 

 

$

(909,415

)

 

$

894,989

 

 

 

14.9

 

Non-compete agreements

 

 

33,881

 

 

 

(30,865

)

 

 

3,016

 

 

 

4.6

 

 

 

33,469

 

 

 

(29,651

)

 

 

3,818

 

 

 

4.5

 

Total

 

$

1,959,207

 

 

$

(1,042,439

)

 

$

916,768

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

1,837,873

 

 

$

(939,066

)

 

$

898,807

 

 

 

 

 

 December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015
(in thousands)
Gross
Carrying
Value
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Net
Carrying
Value
 
Weighted
Average
Life in
Years(1)
 
Gross
Carrying
Value
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Net
Carrying
Value
 
Weighted
Average
Life in
Years(1)
Purchased customer accounts$1,447,680
 $(741,770) $705,910
 15.0 $1,398,986
 $(656,799) $742,187
 15.0
Non-compete agreements29,668
 (28,124) 1,544
 6.8 29,440
 (26,947) 2,493
 6.8
Total$1,477,348
 $(769,894) $707,454
   $1,428,426
 $(683,746) $744,680
  

(1)

(1)Weighted-average

Weighted average life calculated as of the date of acquisition.

Amortization expense for amortizable intangible assets for the years ending December 31, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023 and 20212024 is estimated to be $84.9$101.2 million, $79.6$97.6 million, $75.1$93.1 million, $67.8$86.2 million and $64.5$82.3 million, respectively.

NOTE 6 Investments

At December 31, 2016,2019, the Company’s amortized cost and fair values of fixed maturity securities are summarized as follows:

(in thousands)

 

Cost

 

 

Gross

unrealized

gains

 

 

Gross

unrealized

losses

 

 

Fair value

 

U.S. Treasury securities, obligations of

   U.S. Government agencies and Municipalities

 

$

26,487

 

 

$

174

 

 

$

(39

)

 

$

26,622

 

Corporate debt

 

 

5,324

 

 

 

68

 

 

 

(8

)

 

 

5,384

 

Total

 

$

31,811

 

 

$

242

 

 

$

(47

)

 

$

32,006

 

(in thousands)Cost 
Gross Unrealized
Gains
 
Gross Unrealized
Losses
 Fair Value
U.S. Treasury securities, obligations of
U.S. Government agencies and Municipals
$26,280
 $11
 $(59) $26,232
Corporate debt2,358
 13
 (1) 2,370
Total$28,638
 $24
 $(60) $28,602

At December 31, 2016,2019, the Company held $26.28$26.6 million in fixed income securities composed of U.S Treasury securities, securities issued by U.S. Government agencies and Municipalities,municipalities, and $2.4$5.4 million issued by corporations with investment gradeinvestment-grade ratings. Of the total, $5.6$4.6 million is classified as short-term investments on the Consolidated Balance SheetSheets as maturities are less than one year in duration. Additionally, the Company holds $9.5$7.7 million in short-term investments, which are related to time deposits held with various financial institutions.

For securities in a loss position, the following table shows the investments’ gross unrealized loss and fair value, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position as of December 31, 2016:2019:

 

 

Less than 12 Months

 

 

12 Months or More

 

 

Total

 

(in thousands)

 

Fair value

 

 

Unrealized

losses

 

 

Fair value

 

 

Unrealized

losses

 

 

Fair value

 

 

Unrealized

losses

 

U.S. Treasury securities, obligations of U.S. Government

   agencies and Municipalities

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

7,053

 

 

$

(39

)

 

$

7,053

 

 

$

(39

)

Corporate debt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

998

 

 

 

(8

)

 

 

998

 

 

 

(8

)

Total

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

8,051

 

 

$

(47

)

 

$

8,051

 

 

$

(47

)

(in thousands)Less than 12 Months 12 Months or More Total
 Fair Value 
Unrealized
Losses
 Fair Value 
Unrealized
Losses
 Fair Value 
Unrealized
Losses
U.S. Treasury securities, obligations of U.S. Government agencies and Municipals$14,663
 $(59) $
 $
 $14,663
 $(59)
Foreign Government
 
 
 
 
 
Corporate debt1,001
 (1) 
 
 1,001
 (1)
Total$15,664
 $(60) $
 $
 $15,664
 $(60)

The unrealized losses from corporate issuers were caused by interest rate increases. At December 31, 2016,2019, the Company had 2010 securities in an unrealized loss position. The corporate securities are highly rated securities with no indicators of potential impairment. Based upon the

65


Table of Contents

ability and intent of the Company to hold these investments until recovery of fair value, which may be maturity, the bonds were not considered to be other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31, 2016.


2019.

At December 31, 2015,2018, the Company’s amortized cost and fair values of fixed maturity securities are summarized as follows:

(in thousands)

 

Cost

 

 

Gross

unrealized

gains

 

 

Gross

unrealized

losses

 

 

Fair value

 

U.S. Treasury securities, obligations of

   U.S. Government agencies and Municipalities

 

$

21,729

 

 

$

7

 

 

$

(222

)

 

$

21,514

 

Corporate debt

 

 

623

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

623

 

Total

 

$

22,352

 

 

$

7

 

 

$

(222

)

 

$

22,137

 

(in thousands)Cost 
Gross Unrealized
Gains
 
Gross Unrealized
Losses
 Fair Value
U.S. Treasury securities, obligations of
U.S. Government agencies and Municipals
$11,876
 $6
 $(26) $11,856
Foreign government50
 
 
 50
Corporate debt4,505
 7
 (16) 4,496
Short duration fixed income fund1,663
 27
 
 1,690
Total$18,094
 $40
 $(42) $18,092

The following table shows the investments’ gross unrealized loss and fair value, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position as of December 31, 2015:2018:

 

 

Less than 12 Months

 

 

12 Months or More

 

 

Total

 

(in thousands)

 

Fair value

 

 

Unrealized

losses

 

 

Fair value

 

 

Unrealized

losses

 

 

Fair value

 

 

Unrealized

losses

 

U.S. Treasury securities, obligations of

   U.S. Government agencies and Municipalities

 

$

5,866

 

 

$

(6

)

 

$

12,634

 

 

$

(216

)

 

$

18,500

 

 

$

(222

)

Corporate debt

 

 

457

 

 

 

 

 

 

100

 

 

 

 

 

 

557

 

 

 

 

Total

 

$

6,323

 

 

$

(6

)

 

$

12,734

 

 

$

(216

)

 

$

19,057

 

 

$

(222

)

(in thousands)Less than 12 Months 12 Months or More Total
 Fair Value 
Unrealized
Losses
 Fair Value 
Unrealized
Losses
 Fair Value 
Unrealized
Losses
U.S. Treasury securities, obligations of
U.S. Government agencies and Municipals
$8,998
 $(26) $
 $
 $8,998
 $(26)
Foreign Government50
 
 
 
 50
 
Corporate debt2,731
 (14) 284
 (2) 3,015
 (16)
Total$11,779
 $(40) $284
 $(2) $12,063
 $(42)

The unrealized losses in the Company’s investments in U.S. Treasury Securities and obligations of U.S. Government Agencies and bonds from corporate issuers were caused by interest rate increases. At December 31, 2015,2018, the Company had 3520 securities in an unrealized loss position. The contractual cash flows of the U.S. Treasury Securities and obligations of the U.S. Government agencies investments are either guaranteed by the U.S. Government or an agency of the U.S. Government. Accordingly, it is expected that the securities would not be settled at a price less than the amortized cost of the Company’s investment. The corporate securities are highly rated securities with no indicators of potential impairment. Based upon the ability and intent of the Company to hold these investments until recovery of fair value, which may be maturity, the bonds were not considered to be other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31, 2015.

2018.

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of the fixed maturity securities at December 31, 20162019 by contractual maturity are set forth below:

(in thousands)

 

Amortized cost

 

 

Fair value

 

Years to maturity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Due in one year or less

 

$

4,616

 

 

$

4,628

 

Due after one year through five years

 

 

27,195

 

 

 

27,378

 

Due after five years through ten years

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

$

31,811

 

 

$

32,006

 

(in thousands)Amortized Cost Fair Value
Years to maturity:   
Due in one year or less$5,551
 $5,554
Due after one year through five years22,757
 22,708
Due after five years through ten years330
 340
Total$28,638
 $28,602

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of the fixed maturity securities at December 31, 20152018 by contractual maturity are set forth below:

(in thousands)

 

Amortized cost

 

 

Fair value

 

Years to maturity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Due in one year or less

 

$

4,768

 

 

$

4,743

 

Due after one year through five years

 

 

17,584

 

 

 

17,394

 

Due after five years through ten years

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

$

22,352

 

 

$

22,137

 

(in thousands)Amortized Cost Fair Value
Years to maturity:   
Due in one year or less$5,726
 $5,722
Due after one year through five years12,038
 12,041
Due after five years through ten years330
 329
Total$18,094
 $18,092

The expected maturities in the foregoing table may differ from the contractual maturities because certain borrowers have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without penalty.


Proceeds from the sales and maturity of the Company’s investment in fixed maturity securities were $6.0$5.8 million. This along with maturing time deposits and the utilization of funds from a money market account of $9.1 million yielded total cash proceeds from the sale of investments of $18.9$8.5 million in the period of January 1, 20162019 to December 31, 2016.2019. These proceeds, along with other sources of cash were used to purchase an additional $17.5 million of fixed maturity securities.securities and to fund certain general corporate purposes. The gains and losses realized on those sales for the period from January 1, 20162019 to December 31, 20162019 were insignificant. Additionally, there was a sale

66


Table of the short-duration fixed income fund which resulted in cash proceeds of $1.7 million, as the fund was liquidated in the third quarter of 2016. Gains on this sale were also insignificant.

Contents

Proceeds from the sales and maturity of the Company’s investment in fixed maturity securities were $5.6$17.1 million including maturities for the year ended December 31, 2015.2018. This along with maturing time deposits yielded total cash proceeds from the sale of investments of $17.9 million in the period of January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018. These proceeds were used to purchase an additional $9.3 million of fixed maturity securities and to fund certain general corporate purposes. The gains and losses realized on those sales for the year endedperiod from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 20152018 were insignificant.

Realized gains and losses are reported on the Consolidated Statement of Income, with the cost of securities sold determined on a specific identification basis.

At December 31, 2016,2019, investments with a fair value of approximately $4.0$4.1 million were on deposit with state insurance departments to satisfy regulatory requirements.

NOTE 7  Fixed Assets

Fixed assets at December 31 consisted of the following:

(in thousands)

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Furniture, fixtures and equipment

 

$

231,005

 

 

$

213,928

 

Leasehold improvements

 

 

42,485

 

 

 

39,194

 

Construction in progress

 

 

38,035

 

 

 

7,568

 

Land, buildings and improvements

 

 

8,400

 

 

 

8,185

 

Total cost

 

 

319,925

 

 

 

268,875

 

Less accumulated depreciation and amortization

 

 

(171,298

)

 

 

(168,480

)

Total

 

$

148,627

 

 

$

100,395

 

(in thousands)2016 2015
Furniture, fixtures and equipment$177,823
 $169,682
Leasehold improvements33,137
 32,132
Land, buildings and improvements3,375
 3,370
Total cost214,335
 205,184
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization(138,528) (123,431)
Total$75,807
 $81,753

Depreciation and amortization expense for fixed assets amounted to $21.0$23.4 million in 2016, $20.92019, $22.8 million in 2015,2018 and $20.9$22.7 million in 2014.

2017.

Construction in progress reflects expenditures related to the construction of the new headquarters in Daytona Beach, Florida.

NOTE 8 Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities

Accrued expenses and other liabilities at December 31 consisted of the following:

(in thousands)

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Accrued incentive compensation

 

$

144,475

 

 

$

120,228

 

Accrued compensation and benefits

 

 

60,260

 

 

 

51,731

 

Lease liability(1)

 

 

43,415

 

 

 

 

Deferred revenue

 

 

41,180

 

 

 

37,018

 

Reserve for policy cancellations

 

 

18,353

 

 

 

15,197

 

Accrued interest

 

 

10,984

 

 

 

7,669

 

Accrued rent and vendor expenses(1)

 

 

7,422

 

 

 

34,110

 

Other

 

 

11,628

 

 

 

13,357

 

Total

 

$

337,717

 

 

$

279,310

 

(1)

The Lease liability is the current portion of the Operating lease liabilities as reflected in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2019. The accrued rent previously deferred under Topic 840 was reclassified to Operating lease assets upon the adoption of Topic 842 as described in Note 1 “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies”.  

(in thousands)2016 2015
Accrued bonuses$82,438
 $76,210
Accrued compensation and benefits45,771
 39,366
Accrued rent and vendor expenses28,669
 29,225
Reserve for policy cancellations9,567
 9,617
Accrued interest6,441
 6,375
Other29,103
 31,274
Total$201,989
 $192,067

67


Table of Contents

NOTE 9 Long-Term Debt

Long-term debt at December 31, 20162019 and 20152018 consisted of the following:

(in thousands)

 

December 31,

2019

 

 

December 31,

2018

 

Current portion of long-term debt:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current portion of 5-year term loan facility expires 2022

 

$

40,000

 

 

$

35,000

 

Current portion of 5-year term loan credit agreement

   expires 2023

 

 

15,000

 

 

 

15,000

 

Total current portion of long-term debt

 

 

55,000

 

 

 

50,000

 

Long-term debt:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Note agreements:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4.200% Senior Notes, semi-annual interest payments,

   balloon due 2024

 

 

499,259

 

 

 

499,101

 

4.500% Senior Notes, semi-annual interest payments,

   balloon due 2029

 

 

349,484

 

 

 

 

Total notes

 

 

848,743

 

 

 

499,101

 

Credit agreements:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5-year term loan facility, periodic interest and principal

   payments, LIBOR plus up to 1.750%, expires

   June 28, 2022

 

 

290,000

 

 

 

330,000

 

5-year revolving loan facility, periodic interest payments,

   currently LIBOR plus up to 1.500%, plus commitment

   fees up to 0.250%, expires June 28, 2022

 

 

100,000

 

 

 

350,000

 

5-year term loan facility, periodic interest and principal

   payments, LIBOR plus up to 1.750%, expires

   December 21, 2023

 

 

270,000

 

 

 

285,000

 

Total credit agreements

 

 

660,000

 

 

 

965,000

 

Debt issuance costs (contra)

 

 

(8,400

)

 

 

(7,111

)

Total long-term debt less unamortized discount and

   debt issuance costs

 

 

1,500,343

 

 

 

1,456,990

 

Current portion of long-term debt

 

 

55,000

 

 

 

50,000

 

Total debt

 

$

1,555,343

 

 

$

1,506,990

 

(in thousands)December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015
Current portion of long-term debt:   
Current portion of 5-year term loan facility expires 2019$55,000
 $48,125
5.660% senior notes, Series C, semi-annual interest payments, balloon due 2016
 25,000
Short-term promissory note500
 
Total current portion of long-term debt55,500
 73,125
Long-term debt:   
Note agreements:   
4.500% senior notes, Series E, quarterly interest payments, balloon due 2018100,000
 100,000
4.200% senior notes, semi-annual interest payments, balloon due 2024498,785
 498,628
Total notes598,785
 598,628
Credit agreements:   
5-year term loan facility, periodic interest and principal payments, LIBOR plus up to 1.750%, expires May 20, 2019426,250
 481,250
5-year revolving loan facility, periodic interest payments, currently LIBOR plus up to 1.500%, plus commitment fees up to 0.250%, expires May 20, 2019
 
Revolving credit loan, quarterly interest payments, LIBOR plus up to 1.400% and availability fee up to 0.250%, expires December 31, 2016
 
Total credit agreements426,250
 481,250
Debt issuance costs (contra)(6,663) (8,260)
Total long-term debt less unamortized discount and debt issuance costs1,018,372
 1,071,618
Current portion of long-term debt55,500
 73,125
Total debt$1,073,872
 $1,144,743

On December 22, 2006,June 28, 2017, the Company entered into a Master Shelfan amended and Note Purchase Agreementrestated credit agreement (the “Master“Amended and Restated Credit Agreement”) with a national insurance company (the “Purchaser”). The initial issuance of notes under the Master Agreement occurred on December 22, 2006, through the issuance of $25.0 million in Series C Senior Notes due December 22, 2016, with a fixed interest rate of 5.660% per year. On February 1, 2008, $25.0 million in Series D Senior Notes due January 15, 2015, with a fixed interest rate of 5.370% per year, were issued. On September 15, 2011, and pursuant to a Confirmation of Acceptance (the “Confirmation”), dated January 21, 2011, in connection with the Master Agreement, $100.0 million in Series E Senior Notes were issued and are due September 15, 2018, with a fixed interest rate of 4.500% per year. The Series E Senior Notes were issued for the sole purpose of retiring existing senior notes. On January 15, 2015, the Series D Notes were redeemed at maturity using cash proceeds to pay off the principal of $25.0 million plus any remaining accrued interest. On December 22, 2016, the Series C Notes were redeemed at maturity using cash proceeds to pay off the principal of $25.0 million plus any remaining accrued interest. As of December 31, 2016, there was an outstanding debt balance issued under the provisions of the Master Agreement of $100.0 million.

On July 1, 2013, in conjunction with the acquisition of Beecher Carlson Holdings, Inc., the Company entered into a revolving loan agreement (the “Wells Fargo Agreement”) with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. that provided for a $50.0 million revolving line of credit (the “Wells Fargo Revolver”). On April 16, 2014, in connection with the signing of the Credit Facility (as defined below) an amendment to the agreement was established to reduce the total revolving loan commitment from $50.0 million to $25.0 million. The Wells Fargo Revolver may be increased by up to $50.0 million (bringing the total amount available to $75.0 million). The calculation of interest and fees for the Wells Fargo Agreement is generally based upon the Company’s funded debt-to-EBITDA ratio. Interest is charged at a rate equal to 1.000% to 1.400% above LIBOR or 1.000% below the Base Rate, each as more fully described in the Wells Fargo Agreement. Fees include an up-front fee, an availability fee of 0.175% to 0.250%, and a letter of credit margin fee of 1.000% to 1.400%. The obligations under the Wells Fargo Revolver are unsecured and the Wells Fargo Agreement includes various covenants, limitations and events of default that are customary for similar facilities for similar borrowers. The maturity date for the Wells Fargo Revolver was December 31, 2016. However, on March 14, 2016, the Wells Fargo Revolver was terminated before its maturity date with no fees incurred. There were no borrowings against the Wells Fargo Revolver as of December 31, 2016 or as of December 31, 2015.
On April 17, 2014, the Company entered into a credit agreement withlenders named therein, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as administrative agent and certain other banks as co-syndication agents and co-documentation agentsagents. The Amended and Restated Credit Agreement amended and restated the credit agreement dated April 17, 2014, among such parties (the “Credit“Original Credit Agreement”). The Amended and Restated Credit Agreement inextends the amountapplicable maturity date of $1,350.0 million provides for an unsecuredthe existing revolving credit facility (the “Credit“Revolving Credit Facility”) in the initial amount of $800.0 million to June 28, 2022 and re-evidences unsecured term

loans at $400.0 million while also extending the applicable maturity date to June 28, 2022. The quarterly term loan principal amortization schedule was reset. At the time of the execution of the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, $67.5 million of principal from the original unsecured term loans was repaid using operating cash balances, and the Company added an additional $2.8 million in debt issuance costs related to the initial amount of $550.0 million, either or both of which may, subject to lenders’ discretion, potentially be increased by up to $500.0 million. TheRevolving Credit Facility was funded on May 20, 2014 in conjunction withto the closingCondensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company also expensed to the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income $0.2 million of debt issuance costs related to the Original Credit Agreement due to certain lenders exiting prior to execution of the Wright acquisition, with the $550.0 million term loan being funded as well as a drawdown of $375.0Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. The Company also carried forward $1.6 million on the revolving loan facility. Use of these proceeds was to retire existing term loan debt and to facilitateCondensed Consolidated Balance Sheets the closingremaining unamortized portion of the Wright acquisition as well as other acquisitions. TheOriginal Credit Facility terminates on May 20, 2019, but either or bothAgreement debt issuance costs, which will be amortized over the term of the revolving credit facilityAmended and Restated Credit Agreement. On December 31, 2019, the term loans may be extended for two additional one-year periods atCompany made a scheduled principal payment of $10.0 million per the Company’s request and at the discretionterms of the respective lenders. InterestAmended and facility fees in respect to theRestated Credit Facility are based upon the better of the Company’s net debt leverage ratio or a non-credit enhanced senior unsecured long-term debt rating. Based upon the Company’s net debt leverage ratio, the rates of interest charged on the term loan are 1.000% to 1.750%, and the revolving loan is 0.850% to 1.500% above the adjusted LIBOR rate for outstanding amounts drawn. There are fees included in the facility which include a facility fee based upon the revolving credit commitments of the lenders (whether used or unused) at a rate of 0.150% to 0.250% and letter of credit fees based upon the amounts of outstanding secured or unsecured letters of credit. The Credit Facility includes various covenants, limitations and events of default customary for similar facilities for similarly rated borrowers.Agreement. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015,2019, there was an outstanding debt balance issued under the provisionsterm loan of the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement of $330.0 million and $100.0 million borrowings outstanding against the Revolving Credit Facility. As of December 31, 2018, there was an outstanding debt balance issued under the term loan of the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement of $365.0 million with $350.0 million in borrowings outstanding against the Revolving Credit Facility. The Company had borrowed approximately $600.0 million under its Revolving Credit Facility on November 15, 2018 in totalconnection with the closing of $481.3 millionthe acquisition of certain assets and $529.4 million respectively, with no borrowings outstanding relative to the revolving loan.assumption of certain liabilities of The Hays Group, Inc. and certain of its affiliates. Per the terms of the agreement,Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, a scheduled principal paymentspayment of $55.0$10.0 million areis due in 2017.
March 31, 2020.

On September 18, 2014, the Company issued $500.0 million of 4.200% unsecured senior notesSenior Notes due in 2024. The senior notesSenior Notes were given investment grade ratings of BBB-/Baa3 with a stable outlook. The notes are subject to certain covenant restrictions and regulations which are customary for credit rated obligations. At the time of funding, the proceeds were offered at a discount of the original note amount which also

68


Table of Contents

excluded an underwriting fee discount. The net proceeds received from the issuance were used to repay the outstanding balance of $475.0 million on the revolvingRevolving Credit Facility and for other general corporate purposes. As of December 31, 20162019 and 2015,December 31, 2018, there was an outstanding debt balance of $500.0 million exclusive of the associated discount balance.

The Master Agreement,

On December 21, 2018, the Company entered into a term loan credit agreement (the “Term Loan Credit Agreement”) with the lenders named therein, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent, and certain other banks as co-syndication agents and as joint lead arrangers and joint bookrunners. The Term Loan Credit Agreement provides for an unsecured term loan in the initial amount of $300.0 million, which may, subject to lenders’ discretion, potentially be increased up to an aggregate amount of $450.0 million (the “Term Loan”). The Term Loan is repayable over the five-year term from the effective date of the Term Loan Credit Agreement, which was December 21, 2018. Based on the Company’s net debt leverage ratio or a non-credit enhanced senior unsecured long-term debt rating as determined by Moody’s Investor Service and Standard & Poor’s Rating Service, the rates of interest charged on the term loan are 1.000% to 1.750%, above the adjusted 1-Month LIBOR rate. On December 21, 2018, the Company borrowed $300.0 million under the Term Loan Credit Agreement and used $250.0 million of the proceeds to reduce indebtedness under the Revolving Credit Facility. As of December 31, 2019, there was an outstanding debt balance issued under the Term Loan of $285.0 million. As of December 31, 2018, there was an outstanding debt balance issued under the Term Loan of $300.0 million. Per the terms of the Term Loan Credit Agreement, alla scheduled principal payment of $3.8 million is due March 31, 2020.

On March 11, 2019, the Company completed the issuance of $350.0 million aggregate principal amount of the Company's 4.500% Senior Notes due 2029. The Senior Notes were given investment grade ratings of BBB-/Baa3 with a stable outlook. The notes are subject to certain covenant restrictions, which are customary for credit rated obligations. At the time of funding, the proceeds were offered at a discount of the original note amount, which also excluded an underwriting fee discount. The net proceeds received from the issuance were used to repay a portion of the outstanding balance of $350.0 million on the Revolving Credit Facility, utilized in connection with the financing related to our acquisition of Hays and for other general corporate purposes. As of December 31, 2019, there was an outstanding debt balance of $350.0 million exclusive of the associated discount balance.

The Amended and Restated Credit Agreement and Term Loan Credit Agreement require the Company to maintain certain financial ratios and comply with certain other covenants. The Company was in compliance with all such covenants as of December 31, 20162019 and 2015.

December 31, 2018.

The 30-day Adjusted LIBOR Rate for the term loan and Revolving Credit Facility of the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement and Term Loan Credit Agreement as of December 31, 20162019 was 0.813%.

1.813%, 1.750% and 1.813%, respectively.

Interest paid in 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 20142017 was $37.7$58.3 million, $37.5$38.0 million, and $25.1$36.2 million, respectively.

At December 31, 2016,2019, maturities of long-term debt were $55.5$55.0 million in 2017, $155.02020, $70.0 million in 2018, $371.32021, $380.0 million in 2019, and2022, $210.0 million in 2023, $500.0 million in 2024.

2024 and $350.0 million in 2029.

NOTE 10 Income Taxes

On December 22, 2017, the U.S. government enacted the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “Tax Reform Act”). The Tax Reform Act makes changes to the U.S. tax code that affected our income tax rate in 2017. The Tax Reform Act reduces the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate from 35.0% to 21.0% and requires companies to pay a one-time transition tax on certain unrepatriated earnings from foreign subsidiaries. The Tax Reform Act also establishes new tax laws that became effective January 1, 2018.

ASC 740 requires a company to record the effects of a tax law change in the period of enactment, however, shortly after the enactment of the Tax Reform Act, the SEC staff issued SAB 118, which allows a company to record a provisional amount when it does not have the necessary information available, prepared, or analyzed in reasonable detail to complete its accounting for the change in the tax law. The measurement period ends when the company has obtained, prepared and analyzed the information necessary to finalize its accounting, but cannot extend beyond one year.

For 2017, we made a reasonable estimate of the impact of the Tax Reform Act and recorded a one-time credit in our 2017 income tax expense of  $120.9 million, which reflects an estimated reduction in our deferred income tax liabilities of $124.2 million as a result of the maximum federal rate decreasing to 21.0% from 35.0%, which was partially offset by an estimated increase in income tax payable in the amount of $3.3 million as a result of the transition tax on cash and cash equivalent balances related to untaxed accumulated earnings associated with our international operations. During 2018, we made a credit adjustment to the transition tax on untaxed international operations in the amount of $1.6 million. This adjustment was a reduction of income tax expense for 2018 as a result of updated calculations based on the Company’s tax filings for the 2017 year end. As of December 31, 2019, management does not expect any further changes to the amounts previously recorded and adjusted under SAB 118.

69


Table of Contents

Significant components of the provision for income taxes for the years ended December 31 are as follows:

(in thousands)

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Current:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

 

$

85,507

 

 

$

77,694

 

 

$

129,954

 

State

 

 

28,905

 

 

 

25,096

 

 

 

21,392

 

Foreign

 

 

620

 

 

 

409

 

 

 

929

 

Total current provision

 

 

115,032

 

 

 

103,199

 

 

 

152,275

 

Deferred:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

 

 

14,994

 

 

 

8,483

 

 

 

18,999

 

State

 

 

(2,587

)

 

 

6,519

 

 

 

2,984

 

Foreign

 

 

(24

)

 

 

6

 

 

 

 

Tax Reform Act deferred tax revaluation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(124,166

)

Total deferred provision

 

 

12,383

 

 

 

15,008

 

 

 

(102,183

)

Total tax provision

 

$

127,415

 

 

$

118,207

 

 

$

50,092

 

(in thousands)2016 2015 2014
Current:     
Federal$126,145
 $118,490
 $109,893
State21,110
 17,625
 15,482
Foreign590
 430
 109
Total current provision147,845
 136,545
 125,484
Deferred:     
Federal15,551
 18,416
 5,987
State2,612
 4,280
 1,440
Foreign
 
 (58)
Total deferred provision18,163
 22,696
 7,369
Total tax provision$166,008
 $159,241
 $132,853

A reconciliation of the differences between the effective tax rate and the federal statutory tax rate for the years ended December 31 is as follows:

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2016

 

Federal statutory tax rate

 

 

21.0

%

 

 

21.0

%

 

 

35.0

%

State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit

 

 

3.8

 

 

 

5.7

 

 

 

3.8

 

Non-deductible employee stock purchase plan expense

 

 

0.3

 

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

0.3

 

Non-deductible meals and entertainment

 

 

0.3

 

 

 

0.3

 

 

 

0.3

 

Non-deductible officers’ compensation

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

0.3

 

 

 

 

Tax Reform Act deferred tax revaluation and transition tax

   impact

 

 

 

 

 

(0.3

)

 

 

(26.9

)

Other, net

 

 

(1.4

)

 

 

(1.6

)

 

 

(1.4

)

Effective tax rate

 

 

24.2

%

 

 

25.6

%

 

 

11.1

%

 2016 2015 2014
Federal statutory tax rate35.0% 35.0% 35.0%
State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit3.9 3.9 3.3
Non-deductible employee stock purchase plan expense0.3 0.3 0.3
Non-deductible meals and entertainment0.3 0.3 0.4
Other, net(0.3) 0.1 0.1
Effective tax rate39.2% 39.6% 39.1%

Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the corresponding amounts used for income tax reporting purposes.

Significant components of Brown & Brown’s currentthe Company’s net deferred tax assetsliabilities as of December 31 are as follows:

(in thousands)

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Non-current deferred tax liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Intangible assets

 

$

360,660

 

 

$

334,200

 

Fixed assets

 

 

10,325

 

 

 

4,929

 

ASC 842 lease liabilities

 

 

46,188

 

 

 

 

Impact of adoption of ASC 606 revenue recognition

 

 

24,687

 

 

 

29,729

 

Net unrealized holding (loss)/gain on available-for-sale

   securities

 

 

36

 

 

 

(78

)

Total non-current deferred tax liabilities

 

 

441,896

 

 

 

368,780

 

Non-current deferred tax assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred compensation

 

 

52,566

 

 

 

41,293

 

Accruals and reserves

 

 

7,743

 

 

 

10,455

 

ASC 842 ROU asset

 

 

52,185

 

 

 

 

Net operating loss carryforwards and 163(j) disallowed carryforwards

 

 

2,377

 

 

 

2,196

 

Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets

 

 

(1,252

)

 

 

(896

)

Total non-current deferred tax assets

 

 

113,619

 

 

 

53,048

 

Net non-current deferred tax liability

 

$

328,277

 

 

$

315,732

 

(in thousands)2016 2015
Current deferred tax assets:   
Deferred profit-sharing contingent commissions$10,567
 $9,767
Net operating loss carryforwards10
 10
Accruals and reserves14,032
 14,858
Total current deferred tax assets$24,609
 $24,635
Significant components

On adoption of Brown & Brown’s non-currentthe new Lease Standard ASC 842, the Company has recorded the 2019 lease liabilities of $46.2 million and ROU assets total $52.2 million. In 2018, the accruals and reserves total of $10.5 million includes the net deferred tax liabilities and assets asassociated with accrued leases of December 31 are as follows:

(in thousands)2016 2015
Non-current deferred tax liabilities:   
Fixed assets$6,425
 $8,585
Net unrealized holding (loss)/gain on available-for-sale securities(12) (9)
Intangible assets422,478
 393,251
Total non-current deferred tax liabilities428,891
 401,827
Non-current deferred tax assets:   
Deferred compensation44,912
 38,966
Net operating loss carryforwards2,384
 2,518
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets(700) (606)
Total non-current deferred tax assets46,596
 40,878
Net non-current deferred tax liability$382,295
 $360,949
$3.9 million.

70


Table of Contents

Income taxes paid in 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 20142017 were $143.1$110.0 million, $132.9$110.6 million and $118.3$152.0 million, respectively.

At December 31, 2016, Brown & Brown2019, the Company had net operating loss carryforwards of $156,435$0.1 million and $60.2$39.9 million for federal and state income tax reporting purposes, respectively, portions of which expire in the years 20172020 through 2036.indefinite. The federal carryforward is derived from insurance operations acquired by Brown & Brownthe Company in 2001. The state carryforward amount is derived from the operating results of certain subsidiaries and from the 2013 stock acquisition of Beecher Carlson Holdings, Inc.

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:

(in thousands)

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Unrecognized tax benefits balance at January 1

 

$

1,639

 

 

$

1,694

 

 

$

750

 

Gross increases for tax positions of prior years

 

 

778

 

 

 

594

 

 

 

1,070

 

Gross decreases for tax positions of prior years

 

 

(791

)

 

 

(5

)

 

 

 

Settlements

 

 

(499

)

 

 

(644

)

 

 

(126

)

Unrecognized tax benefits balance at December 31

 

$

1,127

 

 

$

1,639

 

 

$

1,694

 

(in thousands)2016 2015 2014
Unrecognized tax benefits balance at January 1$584
 $113
 $391
Gross increases for tax positions of prior years412
 773
 
Gross decreases for tax positions of prior years(41) 
 (21)
Settlements(205) (302) (257)
Unrecognized tax benefits balance at December 31$750
 $584
 $113

The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense. As of December 31, 20162019, 2018 and 2015,2017 the Company had $86,191$217,635, $197,205 and $102,171$228,608 of accrued interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions, respectively.

The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that would affect the Company’s effective tax rate if recognized was $750,258$1.1 million as of December 31, 2016 and $583,9772019, $1.6 million as of December 31, 2015.2018 and $1.7 million as of December 31, 2017. The Company does not expect its unrecognized tax benefits to change significantly over the next 12 months.

As a result of a 2006 Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) audit, the Company agreed to accrue at each December 31, for tax purposes only, a known amount of profit-sharing contingent commissions represented by the actual amount of profit-sharing contingent commissions received in the first quarter of the related year, with a true-up adjustment to the actual amount received by the end of the following March. Since this method for tax purposes differsdiffered from the method used for book purposes, it will resultresulted in a current deferred tax asset as of December 31, each year which2017. As of January 1, 2018, pursuant to ASU 606, Revenue Recognition, the deferred tax asset was removed and was included in the Company’s overall beginning retained earnings adjustment per ASC 606. The Company will reverse by the following March 31 when the relatednow follow book treatment for accrued profit-sharing contingent commissions are recognized for financial accounting purposes.

commissions.

The Company is subject to taxation in the United States and various state jurisdictions. The Company is also subject to taxation in the United Kingdom.Kingdom and Canada. In the United States, federal returns for fiscal years 20132016 through 20162019 remain open and subject to examination by the IRS. The Company files and remits state income taxes in various states where the Company has determined it is required to file state income taxes. The Company’s filings with those states remain open for audit for the fiscal years 20112015 through 2016.2019. In the United Kingdom, the Company’s filings remain open for audit for the fiscal years 20152018 and 2016.

The federal2019. In Canada, the Company’s filings remain open for audit for the fiscal years 2016 through 2019.

During 2017, the Company settled the previously disclosed IRS income tax returnsaudit of The Wright Insurance Group are currently under IRS audit for the short period ended May 1, 2014. Also during 2016,Pursuant to the agreement in which the Company acquired The Wright Insurance Group, the Company was fully indemnified for all audit-related assessments.

During 2018, the Company settled the previously disclosed State of KansasMassachusetts income tax audit for fiscal years 2012 through 2014 in the amount of $204,695.  The Company and one of its subsidiaries, The Advocator Group, LLC, is currently under examination by the State of Massachusetts for the fiscal year 2013 through 2014.  There are no other federal or state

During 2019, the Company settled the previously disclosed State of Colorado income tax audits asaudit for the fiscal years 2013-2016, the State of December 31, 2016.

Kansas income tax audit for the fiscal years 2014-2016, and the State of New York income tax audit for the fiscal years 2015-2017. In addition, the Company is currently under audit in the states of California, Illinois, and Massachusetts for the fiscal years 2015 through 2017.

In general, it is our practice and intention to reinvest the earnings of our non-U.S. subsidiaries in those operations. As of December 31, 2016, we have not made a provision for U.S. or additional foreign withholding taxes on approximately $2.6 million of the excess of the amount for financial reporting over the tax basis of investments in foreign subsidiaries that is indefinitely reinvested. Generally, such amounts become subject to U.S. taxation upon the remittance of dividends and under certain other circumstances. It is not practicable to estimate the amount of deferred tax liability related to investments in these foreign subsidiaries.

NOTE 10·11  Employee Savings Plan

The Company has an Employee Savings Plan (401(k)) in which substantially all employees with more than 30 days of service are eligible to participate. Under this plan, Brown & Brownthe Company makes matching contributions of up to 4.0% of each participant’s annual compensation. Prior to 2014, the Company’s matching contribution was up to 2.5% of each participant’s annual compensation with aan additional discretionary profit-sharing contribution each year, which equaled 1.5% of each eligible employee’s compensation. The Company’s contributionscontribution expense to the plan totaled $19.3$22.8 million in 2016, $17.82019, $22.8 million in 2015,2018 and $15.8$19.6 million in 2014.

2017.

NOTE 11·12 Stock-Based Compensation

Performance Stock Plan

In 1996, Brown & Brownthe Company adopted and the shareholders approved a performance stock plan, under which until the suspension of the plan in 2010, up to 14,400,00028,800,000 Performance Stock Plan (“PSP”) shares could be granted to key employees contingent on the employees’ future years of

71


Table of Contents

service with Brown & Brownthe Company and other performance-based criteria established by the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors. Before participants may take full title to Performance Stock, two vesting conditions must be met. Of the grants currently outstanding, specified portions satisfied the first condition for vesting based upon 20% incremental increases in the 20-trading-day average stock price of Brown & Brown’s common stock from the price on the business day prior to date of grant. Performance Stock that has satisfied the first vesting condition is considered “awarded shares.” Awarded shares are included as issued and outstanding common stock shares and are included in the calculation of basic and diluted EPS.net income per share. Dividends are paid on awarded shares and participants may exercise voting privileges on such shares. Awarded shares satisfy the second condition for vesting on the earlier of a participant’s: (i) 15 years of continuous employment with Brown & Brown from the date shares are granted to the participants (or, in the case of the July 2009 grant to Powell Brown, 20 years);, (ii) attainment of age 64 (on a prorated basis corresponding to the number of years since the date of grant);, or (iii) death or disability. On April 28, 2010, the PSP was suspended and any remaining authorized, but unissued shares, as well as any shares forfeited in the future, will be reserved for issuance under the 2010 Stock Incentive Plan (the “SIP”“2010 SIP”).

At December 31, 2016, 5,174,1902019, 10,239,624 shares had been granted, net of forfeitures, under the PSP. As of December 31, 2016, 1,003,2752019, 1,051,292 shares had met the first condition of vesting and had been awarded, and 4,170,9159,188,332 shares had satisfied both conditions of vesting and had been distributed to participants. Of the shares that have not vested as of December 31, 2016,2019, the initial stock prices ranged from $13.65$8.30 to $25.68.

$12.84.

The Company uses a path-dependent lattice model to estimate the fair value of PSP grants on the grant date.


A summary of PSP activity for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 20142017 is as follows:

 

 

Weighted-

average grant

date fair value

 

 

Granted

shares

 

 

Awarded

shares

 

 

Shares not

yet awarded

 

Outstanding at January 1, 2017

 

$

5.11

 

 

 

2,006,550

 

 

 

2,006,550

 

 

 

 

Granted

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Awarded

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Vested

 

$

4.81

 

 

 

(277,602

)

 

 

(277,602

)

 

 

 

Forfeited

 

$

5.24

 

 

 

(34,472

)

 

 

(34,472

)

 

 

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2017

 

$

5.16

 

 

 

1,694,476

 

 

 

1,694,476

 

 

 

 

Granted

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Awarded

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Vested

 

$

5.53

 

 

 

(453,860

)

 

 

(453,860

)

 

 

 

Forfeited

 

$

4.92

 

 

 

(44,524

)

 

 

(44,524

)

 

 

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2018

 

$

5.03

 

 

 

1,196,092

 

 

 

1,196,092

 

 

 

 

Granted

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Awarded

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Vested

 

$

5.29

 

 

 

(115,040

)

 

 

(115,040

)

 

 

 

Forfeited

 

$

4.74

 

 

 

(29,760

)

 

 

(29,760

)

 

 

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2019

 

$

5.00

 

 

 

1,051,292

 

 

 

1,051,292

 

 

 

 

 
Weighted-
Average
Grant
Date Fair
Value
 
Granted
Shares
 
Awarded
Shares
 
Shares Not
Yet
Awarded
Outstanding at January 1, 2014$8.62
 2,371,287
 2,295,852
 75,435
Granted$
 
 
 
Awarded$
 
 
 
Vested$16.76
 (277,009) (277,009) 
Forfeited$9.75
 (165,647) (115,630) (50,017)
Outstanding at December 31, 2014$8.71
 1,928,631
 1,903,213
 25,418
Granted$
 
 
 
Awarded$
 
 
 
Vested$5.55
 (208,889) (208,889) 
Forfeited$9.78
 (117,528) (100,110) (17,418)
Outstanding at December 31, 2015$9.03
 1,602,214
 1,594,214
 8,000
Granted$
 
 
 
Awarded$
 
 4,000
 (4,000)
Vested$6.39
 (506,422) (506,422) 
Forfeited$10.52
 (92,517) (88,517) (4,000)
Outstanding at December 31, 2016$10.23
 1,003,275
 1,003,275
 

The total fair value of PSP grants that vested during each of the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 20142017 was $18.1$3.5 million, $6.8$11.9 million and $8.4$6.3 million, respectively.

Stock Incentive Plan

Plans

On April 28, 2010, the shareholders of Brown & Brown,the Company, Inc. approved the 2010 Stock Incentive Plan (“2010 SIP”), which was suspended on May 1, 2019. On May 1, 2019, the shareholders of the Company, Inc. approved the 2019 Stock Incentive Plan (“2019 SIP”) that provides for the granting of stock options,restricted stock, restricted stock units, and/orstock options, stock appreciation rights, and other stock-based awards to employees and directors contingent on performance-based and/or time-based criteria established by the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors. In addition, the 2019 SIP provides for a limited delegation of authority of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer to grant awards to individuals who are not subject to Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The principal purpose of the 2019 SIP is to attract, incentivize and retain key employees by offering those persons an opportunity to acquire or increase a direct proprietary interest in the Company’s operations and future success. The SIP includes a sub-plan applicable to Decus Insurance Brokers Limited (“Decus”) which, is a subsidiarynumber of Decus Holdings (U.K.) Limited. The shares of stock reserved for issuance under the 2019 SIP areis 2,283,475 shares, plus any shares that are authorized for issuance under the PSP2010 SIP (described below), and not already subject to grants under the PSP,2010 SIP, and that were outstanding as of April 28, 2010,May 1, 2019, the date of suspension of the PSP,2010 SIP, together with PSP shares, 2010 SIP shares and 2019 SIP shares forfeited after that date. As of April 28, 2010, 6,046,768May 1, 2019, 6,957,897 shares were available for issuance under the PSP,2010 SIP, which were then transferred to the 2019 SIP. In addition, in May 2016 our shareholders approved an amendment to the SIP to increase the shares available for issuance by an additional 1,200,000.

The Company has granted stock grants to our employees in the form of Restricted Stock Awards and PeformancePerformance Stock Awards under the 2010 SIP and 2019 SIP. To date, a substantial majority of stock grants to employees under the SIPthese plans vest in fourfive to ten yearsyears. The Performance Stock

72


Table of Contents

Awards are subject to the achievement of certain performance criteria by grantees, which may include growth in a defined book of business, organicOrganic Revenue growth and operating profit growth of a profit center, EBITDA growth, organicOrganic Revenue growth of the Company and consolidated EPSdiluted net income per share growth at certain levels of the Company. The performance measurement period ranges from three to five years. Beginning in 2016, certain Performance Stock Awards have a payout range between 0% to 200% depending on the achievement against the stated performance target. Prior to 2016, the majority of the grants had a binary performance measurement criteria that only allowed for 0% or 100% payout.

In 2010, 187,040 shares were granted under the SIP. This grant was conditioned upon the surrender of 187,040 shares previously granted under the PSP in 2009, which were accordingly treated as forfeited PSP shares. The vesting conditions of this grant were identical to those provided for in connection with the 2009 PSP grant; thus the target stock prices and the periods associated with satisfaction of the first and second conditions of vesting were unchanged. Additionally, grants totaling 5,205 shares were made in 2010 to Decus employees under the SIP sub-plan applicable to Decus.
In 2011, 2,375,892 shares were granted under the SIP. Of this total, 24,670 shares were granted to Decus employees under the SIP sub-plan applicable to Decus.
In 2012, 814,545 shares were granted under the SIP, primarily related to the Arrowhead acquisition.

In 2013, 3,719,974 shares were granted under the SIP. Of the shares granted in 2013, 891,399 shares will vest upon the grantees’ completion of between three and seven years of service with the Company, and because grantees have the right to vote the shares and receive dividends immediately after the date of grant these shares are considered awarded and outstanding under the two-class method.
In 2014, 422,572 shares were granted under the SIP. Of the shares granted in 2014, 113,088 shares will vest upon the grantees’ completion of between three and six years of service with the Company, and because grantees have the right to vote the shares and receive dividends immediately after the date of grant these shares are considered awarded and outstanding under the two-class method.
In 2015, 481,166 shares were granted under the SIP. Of the shares granted in 2015, 164,646 shares will vest upon the grantees’ completion of between five and seven years of service with the Company, and because grantees have the right to vote the shares and receive dividends immediately after the date of grant these shares are considered awarded and outstanding under the two-class method.
In 2016, 972,099 shares were granted under the SIP. Of the shares granted in 2016, 182,653 shares will vest upon the grantees’ completion of five years of service with the Company, and because grantees have the right to vote the shares and receive dividends immediately after the date of grant these shares are considered awarded and outstanding under the two-class method.
Additionally, non-employee

Non-employee members of the Board of Directors received shares annually issued pursuant to the 2010 SIP as part of their annual compensation. A total of 36,919 SIP shares were issued to these directors in 2011 and 2012, of which 11,682 were issued in January 2011, 12,627 in January 2012, and 12,610 in December 2012. The shares issued in December 2012 were issued at that earlier time rather than in January 2013 pursuant to action of the Board of Directors. No additional shares were granted or issued to the non-employee members of the Board of Directors in 2013. A total of 9,870 shares were issued to these directors in January 2014, 15,70022,700 shares were issued in January 2015 and 16,8602017, 26,620 shares were issued in January 2016.

The following table sets forth information as of December 31, 2016, 2015,2018 and 2014, with respect to the number of time-based restricted shares granted and awarded, the number of performance-based restricted shares granted, and the number of performance-based restricted shares awarded under our Performance Stock Plan and 2010 Stock Incentive Plan:
Year Time-Based Restricted Stock Granted and Awarded Performance-Based Restricted Stock Granted Performance-Based Restricted Stock Awarded
2016 182,653
 789,446
(1) 
1,435,319
2015 164,646
 316,520
 
2014 113,088
 309,484
 
(1)Of the 789,446 shares of performance-based restricted stock granted in 2016, the payout for 353,132 shares may be increased up to 200% of the target or decreased to zero, subject to the level of performance attained. The amount reflected in the table includes all restricted stock grants at a target payout of 100%.
At December 31, 2016, 3,729,56627,885 shares were available for future grants. This amount is calculated assuming the maximum payout for all restricted stock grants. The payout for 321,955 shares of our outstanding performance-based restricted stock grants may be increased up to 200% of the target or decreased to zero, subject to the level of performance attained. 
issued in April 2019.

The Company uses the closing stock price on the day prior to the grant date to determine the fair value of grants under the 2010 SIP grantsand 2019 SIP and then applies an estimated forfeiture factor to estimate the annual expense. Additionally, the Company uses the path-dependent lattice model to estimate the fair value of grants with PSP-type vesting conditions as of the grant date. SIP shares that satisfied the first vesting condition for PSP-type grants or the established performance criteria are considered awarded shares. Awarded shares are included as issued and outstanding common stock shares and are included in the calculation of basic and diluted EPS.


net income per share.

A summary of 2010 SIP and 2019 SIP activity for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 20142017 is as follows:

 

 

Weighted-

average grant

date fair value

 

 

Granted

shares

 

 

Awarded

shares

 

 

Shares not

yet awarded

 

 

Outstanding at January 1, 2017

 

$

14.98

 

 

 

12,256,112

 

 

 

4,802,588

 

 

 

7,453,524

 

 

Granted

 

$

20.82

 

 

 

1,392,912

 

 

 

241,334

 

 

 

1,151,578

 

(1)

Awarded

 

$

15.72

 

 

 

 

 

 

326,808

 

 

 

(326,808

)

 

Vested

 

$

12.61

 

 

 

(484,914

)

 

 

(484,914

)

 

 

 

 

Forfeited

 

$

14.89

 

 

 

(342,120

)

 

 

(76,212

)

 

 

(265,908

)

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2017

 

$

15.58

 

 

 

12,821,990

 

 

 

4,809,604

 

 

 

8,012,386

 

 

Granted

 

$

22.87

 

 

 

1,577,721

 

 

 

454,313

 

 

 

1,123,408

 

(2)

Awarded

 

$

15.89

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,489,905

 

 

 

(2,489,905

)

 

Vested

 

$

14.09

 

 

 

(933,916

)

 

 

(933,916

)

 

 

 

 

Forfeited

 

$

16.37

 

 

 

(2,363,420

)

 

 

(224,587

)

 

 

(2,138,833

)

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2018

 

$

16.69

 

 

 

11,102,375

 

 

 

6,595,319

 

 

 

4,507,056

 

 

Granted

 

$

28.53

 

 

 

1,812,047

 

 

 

797,778

 

 

 

1,014,269

 

(3)

Awarded

 

$

17.26

 

 

 

299,339

 

 

 

1,954,983

 

 

 

(1,655,644

)

 

Vested

 

$

14.29

 

 

 

(1,068,211

)

 

 

(1,068,211

)

 

 

 

 

Forfeited

 

$

19.09

 

 

 

(503,632

)

 

 

(209,293

)

 

 

(294,339

)

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2019

 

$

18.10

 

 

 

11,641,918

 

 

 

8,070,576

 

 

 

3,571,342

 

 

 
Weighted-
Average
Grant
Date Fair
Value
 
Granted
Shares
 
Awarded
Shares
 
Shares Not
Yet
Awarded
 
Outstanding at January 1, 2014$27.96
 6,606,101
 995,717
 5,610,384
 
Granted$31.02
 422,572
 113,088
 309,484
 
Awarded$
 
 
 
 
Vested$
 
 
 
 
Forfeited$27.41
 (369,626) (47,915) (321,711) 
Outstanding at December 31, 2014$28.19
 6,659,047
 1,060,890
 5,598,157
 
Granted$31.74
 481,166
 164,646
 316,520
 
Awarded$
 
 
 
 
Vested$
 
 
 
 
Forfeited$26.32
 (863,241) (95,542) (767,699) 
Outstanding at December 31, 2015$28.74
 6,276,972
 1,129,994
 5,146,978
 
Granted$35.52
 972,099
 182,653
 789,446
(1) 
Awarded$24.93
 
 1,431,319
 (1,431,319) 
Vested$27.31
 (166,884) (166,884) 
 
Forfeited$25.34
 (954,131) (175,788) (778,343) 
Outstanding at December 31, 2016$29.96
 6,128,056
 2,401,294
 3,726,762
 

(1)

(1)

Of the 789,4461,151,578 shares of performance-based restricted stock granted in 2016,2017, the payout for 353,132641,652 shares may be increased up to 200% of the target or decreased to zero,0, subject to the level of performance attained. The amount reflected in the table includes all restricted stock grants at a target payout of 100%.

(2)

Of the 1,123,408 shares of performance-based restricted stock granted in 2018, the payout for 576,886 shares may be increased up to 200% of the target or decreased to 0, subject to the level of performance attained. The amount reflected in the table includes all restricted stock grants at a target payout of 100%.

(3)

Of the 1,014,269 shares of performance-based restricted stock granted in 2019, the payout for 501,384 shares may be increased up to 200% of the target or decreased to 0, subject to the level of performance attained. The amount reflected in the table includes all restricted stock grants at a target payout of 100%.

The following table sets forth information as of December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, with respect to the number of time-based restricted shares granted and awarded, the number of performance-based restricted shares granted, and the number of performance-based restricted shares awarded under our Performance Stock Plan and 2010 Stock Incentive Plan:

Year

 

Time-based restricted

stock granted and

awarded

 

 

Performance-based

restricted

stock granted

 

 

Performance-based

restricted

stock awarded

 

2019

 

 

797,778

 

 

 

1,014,269

 

(1)

 

1,954,983

 

2018

 

 

454,313

 

 

 

1,123,408

 

(2)

 

2,489,905

 

2017

 

 

241,334

 

 

 

1,151,578

 

(3)

 

326,808

 

73


Table of Contents

(1)

Of the 1,014,269 shares of performance-based restricted stock granted in 2019, the payout for 501,384 shares may be increased up to 200% of the target or decreased to 0, subject to the level of performance attained. The amount reflected in the table includes all restricted stock grants at a target payout of 100%.

(2)

Of the 1,123,408 shares of performance-based restricted stock granted in 2018, the payout for 576,886 shares may be increased up to 200% of the target or decreased to 0, subject to the level of performance attained. The amount reflected in the table includes all restricted stock grants at a target payout of 100%.

(3)

Of the 1,151,578 shares of performance-based restricted stock granted in 2017, the payout for 641,652 shares may be increased up to 200% of the target or decreased to 0, subject to the level of performance attained. The amount reflected in the table includes all restricted stock grants at a target payout of 100%.

At December 31, 2019, 9,515,603 shares were available for future grants under the 2019 SIP. This amount is calculated assuming the maximum payout for all restricted stock grants. 

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

The Company has a shareholder-approved Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”) with a total of 17,000,00034,000,000 authorized shares of which 4,680,2636,340,598 were available for future subscriptions as of December 31, 2016.2019. Employees of the Company who regularly work more than 20 hours or more per week are eligible to participate in the ESPP. Participants, through payroll deductions, may allot up to 10% of their compensation up totowards the purchase of a maximum of $25,000 to purchaseworth of Company stock between August 1st of each year and the following July 31st (the “Subscription Period”) at a cost of 85% of the lower of the stock price as of the beginning or end of the Subscription Period.

The Company estimates the fair value of an ESPP share option as of the beginning of the Subscription Period as the sum of: (1) 15% of the quoted market price of the Company’s stock on the day prior to the beginning of the Subscription Period, and (2) 85% of the value of a one-year stock option on the Company stock using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The estimated fair value of an ESPP share option as of the Subscription Period beginning in August 20162019 was $7.61.$7.46. The fair values of an ESPP share option as of the Subscription Periods beginning in August 20152018 and 2014,2017, were $6.43$5.88 and $6.39,$4.32, respectively.

For the ESPP plan years ended July 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014,2017, the Company issued 514,665, 539,389,976,303, 985,601 and 512,5211,058,024 shares of common stock, respectively. These shares were issued at an aggregate purchase price of $15.0$24.0 million, or $29.23$24.63 per share, in 2016, $14.42019, $18.7 million, or $26.62$18.96 per share, in 2015,2018, and $13.4$16.4 million, or $26.16$15.52 per share, in 2014.

2017.

For the five months ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 20142017 (portions of the 2016-2017, 2015-20162019-2020, 2018-2019 and 2014-20152017-2018 plan years), 247,023; 231,803;419,446, 402,349 and 235,794435,027 shares of common stock (from authorized but unissued shares), respectively, were subscribed to by ESPP participants for proceeds of approximately $7.7$12.8 million, $6.8$9.9 million and $6.3$8.2 million, respectively.

Incentive Stock Option Plan
On April 21, 2000, Brown & Brown adopted, and the shareholders approved, a qualified incentive stock option plan (the “ISOP”) that provides for the granting of stock options to certain key employees for up to 4,800,000 shares of common stock. On December 31, 2008, the ISOP expired. The objective of the ISOP was to provide additional performance incentives to grow Brown & Brown’s pre-tax income in excess of 15% annually. The options were granted at the most recent trading day’s closing market price and vest over a one-to-ten-year period, with a potential acceleration of the vesting period to three-to-six years based upon achievement of certain performance goals. All of the options expire 10 years after the grant date.

The Company uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to estimate the fair value of stock options on the grant date. The risk-free interest rate is based upon the U.S. Treasury yield curve on the date of grant with a remaining term approximating the expected term of the option granted. The expected term of the options granted is derived from historical data; grantees are divided into two groups based upon expected exercise behavior and are considered separately for valuation purposes. The expected volatility is based upon the historical volatility of the Company’s common stock over the period of time equivalent to the expected term of the options granted. The dividend yield is based upon the Company’s best estimate of future dividend yield.
A summary of stock option activity for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 is as follows:
Stock Options 
Shares
Under
Option
 
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
 
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
(in years)
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
(in thousands)
Outstanding at January 1, 2014 622,945
 $18.39
 4.1 $7,289
Granted 
 $
    
Exercised (106,589) $18.48
    
Forfeited (46,000) $18.48
    
Expired 
 $
    
Outstanding at December 31, 2014 470,356
 $18.57
 3.1 $5,087
Granted 
 $
    
Exercised (151,767) $18.48
    
Forfeited (49,000) $19.36
    
Expired 
 $
    
Outstanding at December 31, 2015 269,589
 $18.48
 2.2 $2,395
Granted 
 $
    
Exercised (64,589) $18.48
    
Forfeited (30,000) $18.48
    
Expired 
 $
    
Outstanding at December 31, 2016 175,000
 $18.48
 1.2 $4,616
Ending vested and expected to vest at December 31,
2016
 175,000
 $18.48
 1.2 $4,616
Exercisable at December 31, 2016 175,000
 $18.48
 1.2 $4,616
Exercisable at December 31, 2015 164,589
 $18.48
 2.2 $2,241
Exercisable at December 31, 2014 316,356
 $18.48
 3.2 $4,565
The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at December 31, 2016:
Options Outstanding Options Exercisable
Exercise Price 
Number
Outstanding
 
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life (years)
 
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 
Number
Exercisable
 
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
$18.48 175,000
 1.2 $18.48
 175,000
 $18.48
Totals 175,000
 1.2 $18.48
 175,000
 $18.48
The total intrinsic value of options exercised, determined as of the date of exercise, during the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 was $1.0 million, $2.2 million and $1.3 million, respectively. The total intrinsic value is calculated as the difference between the exercise price of all underlying awards and the quoted market price of the Company’s stock for all in-the-money stock options at December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
There are no option shares available for future grant under the ISOP since this plan expired as of December 31, 2008.

Summary of Non-Cash Stock-Based Compensation Expense

The non-cash stock-based compensation expense for the years ended December 31 is as follows:

(in thousands)

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Stock incentive plans

 

$

39,626

 

 

$

28,027

 

 

$

24,899

 

Employee stock purchase plan

 

 

6,504

 

 

 

4,744

 

 

 

4,025

 

Performance stock plan

 

 

864

 

 

 

748

 

 

 

1,707

 

Total

 

$

46,994

 

 

$

33,519

 

 

$

30,631

 

(in thousands) 2016 2015 2014
Stock Incentive Plan $11,049
 $11,111
 $14,447
Employee Stock Purchase Plan 3,698
 3,430
 2,425
Performance Stock Plan 1,305
 972
 2,354
Incentive Stock Option Plan 
 
 137
Total $16,052
 $15,513
 $19,363

Summary of UnrecognizedUnamortized Compensation Expense

As of December 31, 2016,2019, the Company estimates there was approximately $92.1to be $109.7 million of unrecognizedunamortized compensation expense related to all non-vested stock-based compensation arrangements granted under the Company’s stock-based compensation plans.plans, based upon current projections of grant measurement against performance criteria. That expense is expected to be recognized over a weighted-averageweighted average period of 4.33.27 years.

NOTE 12·13  Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information and Non-Cash Financing and Investing Activities

The Company’s cash paid during the period for interest and income taxes are summarized as follows:

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

(in thousands)

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Cash paid during the period for:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest

 

$

58,290

 

 

$

38,032

 

 

$

36,172

 

Income taxes

 

$

110,046

 

 

$

110,557

 

 

$

152,024

 

74


Table of Contents

The Company’s significant non-cash investing and financing activities are summarized as follows:

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

(in thousands)

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Other payables issued for purchased customer accounts

 

$

12,135

 

 

$

5,462

 

 

$

11,708

 

Estimated acquisition earn-out payables and related charges

 

$

82,872

 

 

$

77,378

 

 

$

6,921

 

Notes received on the sale of fixed assets and customer accounts

 

$

9,903

 

 

$

52

 

 

$

 

OurRestricted Cash balance is comprisedcomposed of funds held in separate premium trust accounts as required by state law or, in some cases, per agreement with our carrier partners. In the second quarterThe following is a reconciliation of 2015, certain balances that had previously been reportedcash and cash equivalents inclusive of restricted cash as held in restricted premium trust accounts were reclassified as non-restricted as they were not restricted by state law or by contractual agreement with a carrier. The resulting impact of this change was a reduction in the balance reported on our Consolidated Balance Sheet as Restricted Cash and Investments and a corresponding increase in the balance reported as Cash and Cash Equivalents of approximately $33.0 million as of December 31, 2015 as compared to the corresponding account balances as of December 31, 2014 of $32.2 million which was reflected as Restricted Cash. While these referenced funds are not restricted, they do represent premium payments from customers to be paid to insurance carriers 2019,2018and this change in classification should not be viewed as a source of operating cash.2017.

 

 

Balance as of December 31,

 

(in thousands)

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Table to reconcile cash and cash equivalents inclusive of

   restricted cash

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

542,174

 

 

$

438,961

 

 

$

573,383

 

Restricted cash

 

 

420,801

 

 

 

338,635

 

 

 

250,705

 

Total cash and cash equivalents inclusive of restricted cash at

   the end of the period

 

$

962,975

 

 

$

777,596

 

 

$

824,088

 

 For the Year Ended December 31, 
(in thousands)2016 2015 2014
Cash paid during the period for:     
Interest$37,652
 $37,542
 $25,115
Income taxes$143,111
 $132,874
 $118,290
Brown & Brown’s significant non-cash investing and financing activities are summarized as follows:
 For the Year Ended December 31, 
(in thousands)2016 2015 2014
Other payables issued for purchased customer accounts$10,664
 $10,029
 $1,930
Estimated acquisition earn-out payables and related charges$4,463
 $36,899
 $33,229
Notes payable issued or assumed for purchased customer accounts$492
 $
 $
Notes received on the sale of fixed assets and customer accounts$22
 $7,755
 $6,340

NOTE 13·14 Commitments and Contingencies

Operating Leases
Brown & Brown leases facilities and certain items of office equipment under non-cancelable operating lease arrangements expiring on various dates through 2042. The facility leases generally contain renewal options and escalation clauses based upon increases in the lessors’ operating expenses and other charges. Brown & Brown anticipates that most of these leases will be renewed or replaced upon expiration. At December 31, 2016, the aggregate future minimum lease payments under all non-cancelable lease agreements were as follows:
(in thousands) 
2017$42,727
201839,505
201934,277
202029,393
202122,222
Thereafter45,036
Total minimum future lease payments$213,160
Rental expense in 2016, 2015 and 2014 for operating leases totaled $49.3 million, $46.0 million, and $49.0 million, respectively.

Legal Proceedings

The Company records losses for claims in excess of the limits of, or outside the coverage of, applicable insurance at the time and to the extent they are probable and estimable. In accordance with ASC Topic 450-Contingencies, the Company accrues anticipated costs of settlement, damages, losses for liability claims and, under certain conditions, costs of defense, based upon historical experience or to the extent specific losses are probable and estimable. Otherwise, the Company expenses these costs as incurred. If the best estimate of a probable loss is a range rather than a specific amount, the Company accrues the amount at the lower end of the range.

The Company’s accruals for legal matters that were probable and estimable were not material at December 31, 20162019 and 2015.2018. We continue to assess certain litigation and claims to determine the amounts, if any, that management believes will be paid as a result of such claims and litigation and, therefore, additional losses may be accrued and paid in the future, which could adversely impact the Company’s operating results, cash flows and overall liquidity. The Company maintains third-party insurance policies to provide coverage for certain legal claims, in an effort to mitigate its overall exposure to unanticipated claims or adverse decisions. However, as (i) one or more of the Company’s insurance carriers could take the position that portions of these claims are not covered by the Company’s insurance, (ii) to the extent that payments are made to resolve claims and lawsuits, applicable insurance policy limits are eroded and (iii) the claims and lawsuits relating to these matters are continuing to develop, it is possible that future results of operations or cash flows for any particular quarterly or annual period could be materially affected by unfavorable resolutions of these matters. Based upon the AM Best Company ratings of these third-party insurers, management does not believe there is a substantial risk of an insurer’s material non-performance related to any current insured claims.

On the basis of current information, the availability of insurance and legal advice, in management’s opinion, the Company is not currently involved in any legal proceedings which, individually or in the aggregate, would have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, operations and/or cash flows.



NOTE 14·15  Leases

Substantially all of the Company's operating lease right-of-use assets and operating lease liabilities represent real estate leases for office space used to conduct the Company's business that expire on various dates through 2043. Leases generally contain renewal options and escalation clauses based upon increases in the lessors’ operating expenses and other charges. The Company anticipates that most of these leases will be renewed or replaced upon expiration.

The Company assess at inception of a contract if it contains a lease. This assessment is based on: (1) whether the contract involves the use of a distinct identified asset, (2) whether the Company obtains the right to substantially all the economic benefit from the use of the asset throughout the period, and (3) whether the Company has the right to direct the use of the asset.

Variable lease cost is lease payments that are based on an index or similar rate. They are initially measured using the index or rate in effect at lease commencement and are based on the minimum payments stated in the lease. Additional payments based on the change in an index or rate, or payments based on a change in the Company's portion of the operating expenses, including real estate taxes and insurance, are recorded as a period expense when incurred.

75


Table of Contents

The right-of-use asset is initially measured at cost, which is primarily composed of the initial lease liability, plus any initial direct costs incurred, less any lease incentives received. The lease liability is initially measured at the present value of the minimum lease payments through the term of the lease. Minimum lease payments are discounted to present value using the incremental borrowing rate at the lease commencement date, which approximates the rate of interest the Company expects to be paid on a secured borrowing in an amount equal to the lease payments for the underlying asset under similar terms and economic conditions. The balances and classification of operating lease right-of-use assets and operating lease liabilities within the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets is as follows:

(in thousands)

 

 

 

December 31, 2019

 

Balance Sheet

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating lease right-of-use assets

 

 

 

 

184,288

 

Total assets

 

Operating lease assets

 

$

184,288

 

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current operating lease liabilities

 

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

 

 

43,415

 

Non-current operating lease liabilities

 

Operating lease liabilities

 

 

167,855

 

Total liabilities

 

 

 

$

211,270

 

As of December 31, 2019, the Company has entered into future lease agreements expected to commence in 2020 and 2021 consisting of undiscounted lease liabilities of $5.1 million and $0.6 million, respectively.    

The components of lease cost for operating leases for the 12 months ended December 31, 2019 were:

(in thousands)

 

 

 

Twelve Months Ended

December 31, 2019

 

Operating leases:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lease cost

 

 

 

$

49,872

 

Variable lease cost

 

 

 

 

3,819

 

Short term lease cost

 

 

 

 

267

 

Operating lease cost

 

 

 

$

53,958

 

Sublease income

 

 

 

 

(1,386

)

Total lease cost net

 

 

 

$

52,572

 

The weighted average remaining lease term and the weighted average discount rate for operating leases as of December 31, 2019 were:

Weighted-average remaining lease term

6.00

Weighted-average discount rate

3.70

Maturities of the operating lease liabilities by fiscal year at December 31, 2019 for the Company's operating leases are as follows:

(in thousands)

 

Operating Leases

 

2020

 

$

48,884

 

2021

 

 

45,547

 

2022

 

 

38,056

 

2023

 

 

31,625

 

2024

 

 

24,469

 

Thereafter

 

 

51,571

 

Total undiscounted lease payments

 

 

240,152

 

Less: Imputed interest

 

 

28,882

 

Total minimum future lease payments

 

$

211,270

 

76


Table of Contents

At December 31, 2018, the aggregate future minimum lease payments under all non-cancelable lease agreements were as follows:

(in thousands)

 

December 31, 2018

 

2019

 

$

48,292

 

2020

 

 

43,517

 

2021

 

 

34,836

 

2022

 

 

27,035

 

2023

 

 

19,981

 

Thereafter

 

 

36,349

 

Total minimum future lease payments

 

$

210,010

 

Supplemental cash flow information for operating leases:

(in thousands)

  

 

 

Twelve months ended

December 31, 2019

 

Cash paid for amounts included in measurement of liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating cash flows from operating leases

 

 

 

 

$

51,894

 

Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for new operating

   liabilities

 

 

 

 

$

46,730

 

NOTE 16 Quarterly Operating Results (Unaudited)

Quarterly operating results for 20162019 and 20152018 were as follows:

(in thousands, except per share data)

 

First

Quarter

 

 

Second

Quarter

 

 

Third

Quarter

 

 

Fourth

Quarter

 

2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total revenues

 

$

619,280

 

 

$

575,219

 

 

$

618,683

 

 

$

578,989

 

Total expenses

 

$

470,760

 

 

$

451,697

 

 

$

466,845

 

 

$

476,940

 

Income before income taxes

 

$

148,520

 

 

$

123,522

 

 

$

151,838

 

 

$

102,049

 

Net income

 

$

113,896

 

 

$

92,593

 

 

$

115,506

 

 

$

76,519

 

Net income per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

0.41

 

 

$

0.33

 

 

$

0.41

 

 

$

0.27

 

Diluted

 

$

0.40

 

 

$

0.33

 

 

$

0.41

 

 

$

0.27

 

2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total revenues

 

$

501,461

 

 

$

473,187

 

 

$

530,850

 

 

$

508,748

 

Total expenses

 

$

383,020

 

 

$

372,277

 

 

$

388,350

 

 

$

408,137

 

Income before income taxes

 

$

118,441

 

 

$

100,910

 

 

$

142,500

 

 

$

100,611

 

Net income

 

$

90,828

 

 

$

73,922

 

 

$

106,053

 

 

$

73,452

 

Net income per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

0.33

 

 

$

0.27

 

 

$

0.38

 

 

$

0.26

 

Diluted

 

$

0.32

 

 

$

0.26

 

 

$

0.38

 

 

$

0.26

 

(in thousands, except per share data) 
First
Quarter
 
Second
Quarter
 
Third
Quarter
 
Fourth
Quarter
2016  
  
  
  
Total revenues $424,173
 $446,518
 $462,274
 $433,664
Total expenses $321,624
 $337,441
 $345,302
 $338,763
Income before income taxes $102,549
 $109,077
 $116,972
 $94,901
Net income $62,070
 $66,250
 $71,545
 $57,626
Net income per share:        
Basic $0.45
 $0.47
 $0.51
 $0.41
Diluted $0.44
 $0.47
 $0.50
 $0.41
2015        
Total revenues $404,298
 $419,447
 $432,167
 $404,597
Total expenses $310,520
 $318,533
 $319,337
 $309,560
Income before income taxes $93,778
 $100,914
 $112,830
 $95,037
Net income $56,951
 $61,005
 $67,427
 $57,935
Net income per share:        
Basic $0.40
 $0.43
 $0.48
 $0.41
Diluted $0.39
 $0.43
 $0.47
 $0.41

Quarterly financial results are affected by seasonal variations. The timing of the Company’s receipt of profit-sharing contingent commissions,insurance policy renewals sold by the Company and acquisitions may cause revenues, expenses and net income to vary significantly between quarters.

NOTE 15·17  Segment Information

Brown & Brown’s business is divided into four4 reportable segments: (1) the Retail Segment, which provides a broad range of insurance products and services to commercial, public and quasi-public entities, and to professional and individual customers;customers, and non-insurance risk-mitigating products through our automobile dealer services (“F&I”) businesses, (2) the National Programs Segment, which acts as aan MGA, provides professional liability and related package products for certain professionals, a range of insurance products for individuals, flood coverage, and targeted products and services designated for specific industries, trade groups, governmental entities and market niches, all of which are delivered through nationwide networks of independent agents, and Brown & Brown retail agents;agents, (3) the Wholesale Brokerage Segment, which markets and sells excess and surplus commercial and personal lines insurance, primarily through independent agents and brokers, as well as Brown & Brown retail agents;agents, and (4) the Services Segment, which provides insurance-related services, including third-party claims administration and comprehensive medical utilization management services in both the workers’ compensation and all-lines liability arenas, as well as Medicare Set-aside services, Social Security disability and Medicare benefits advocacy services and claims adjusting services.

77


Table of Contents

Brown & Brown conducts all of its operations within the United States of America, except for a wholesale brokerage operation based in London, England, and retail operations in Bermuda and the Cayman Islands.Islands, and a national programs operation in Canada. These operations earned $14.5$17.7 million, $13.4$15.2 million and $13.3$15.9 million of total revenues for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014,2017, respectively. Long-lived assets held outside of the United States during each of these three years were not material.

The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those described in Note 1. The Company evaluates the performance of its segments based upon revenues and income before income taxes. Inter-segment revenues are eliminated.

Summarized financial information concerning the Company’s reportable segments is shown in the following table. The “Other” column includes any income and expenses not allocated to reportable segments and corporate-related items, including the intercompany interest expense charge to the reporting segment.

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2019

 

(in thousands)

 

Retail

 

 

National

Programs

 

 

Wholesale

Brokerage

 

 

Services

 

 

Other

 

 

Total

 

Total revenues

 

$

1,367,261

 

 

$

518,384

 

 

$

310,087

 

 

$

193,781

 

 

$

2,658

 

 

$

2,392,171

 

Investment income

 

$

149

 

 

$

1,397

 

 

$

178

 

 

$

139

 

 

$

3,917

 

 

$

5,780

 

Amortization

 

$

63,146

 

 

$

25,482

 

 

$

11,191

 

 

$

5,479

 

 

$

 

 

$

105,298

 

Depreciation

 

$

7,390

 

 

$

6,791

 

 

$

1,674

 

 

$

1,229

 

 

$

6,333

 

 

$

23,417

 

Interest expense

 

$

87,295

 

 

$

16,690

 

 

$

4,756

 

 

$

4,404

 

 

$

(49,485

)

 

$

63,660

 

Income before income taxes

 

$

222,875

 

 

$

143,737

 

 

$

82,739

 

 

$

40,337

 

 

$

36,241

 

 

$

525,929

 

Total assets

 

$

6,413,459

 

 

$

3,110,368

 

 

$

1,390,250

 

 

$

481,336

 

 

$

(3,772,592

)

 

$

7,622,821

 

Capital expenditures

 

$

12,497

 

 

$

10,365

 

 

$

6,171

 

 

$

804

 

 

$

43,271

 

 

$

73,108

 

Segment results for prior periods have been recast to reflect the current year segmental structure. Certain reclassifications

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2018

 

(in thousands)

 

Retail

 

 

National

Programs

 

 

Wholesale

Brokerage

 

 

Services

 

 

Other

 

 

Total

 

Total revenues

 

$

1,042,763

 

 

$

494,463

 

 

$

287,014

 

 

$

189,246

 

 

$

760

 

 

$

2,014,246

 

Investment income

 

$

2

 

 

$

506

 

 

$

165

 

 

$

205

 

 

$

1,868

 

 

$

2,746

 

Amortization

 

$

44,386

 

 

$

25,954

 

 

$

11,391

 

 

$

4,813

 

 

$

 

 

$

86,544

 

Depreciation

 

$

5,289

 

 

$

5,486

 

 

$

1,628

 

 

$

1,558

 

 

$

8,873

 

 

$

22,834

 

Interest expense

 

$

35,969

 

 

$

26,181

 

 

$

5,254

 

 

$

2,869

 

 

$

(29,693

)

 

$

40,580

 

Income before income taxes

 

$

217,845

 

 

$

117,375

 

 

$

70,171

 

 

$

34,508

 

 

$

22,563

 

 

$

462,462

 

Total assets

 

$

5,850,045

 

 

$

2,940,097

 

 

$

1,283,877

 

 

$

471,572

 

 

$

(3,856,923

)

 

$

6,688,668

 

Capital expenditures

 

$

6,858

 

 

$

12,391

 

 

$

2,518

 

 

$

1,525

 

 

$

18,228

 

 

$

41,520

 

have been made to the prior year amounts reported in this Annual Report on Form 10-K in order to conform to the current year

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2017

 

(in thousands)

 

Retail

 

 

National

Programs

 

 

Wholesale

Brokerage

 

 

Services

 

 

Other

 

 

Total

 

Total revenues

 

$

943,460

 

 

$

479,813

 

 

$

271,737

 

 

$

165,372

 

 

$

20,965

 

 

$

1,881,347

 

Investment income

 

$

8

 

 

$

384

 

 

$

 

 

$

299

 

 

$

935

 

 

$

1,626

 

Amortization

 

$

42,164

 

 

$

27,277

 

 

$

11,456

 

 

$

4,548

 

 

$

1

 

 

$

85,446

 

Depreciation

 

$

5,210

 

 

$

6,325

 

 

$

1,885

 

 

$

1,600

 

 

$

7,678

 

 

$

22,698

 

Interest expense

 

$

31,133

 

 

$

35,561

 

 

$

6,263

 

 

$

3,522

 

 

$

(38,163

)

 

$

38,316

 

Income before income taxes

 

$

196,616

 

 

$

109,961

 

 

$

68,844

 

 

$

30,498

 

 

$

43,803

 

 

$

449,722

 

Total assets

 

$

4,255,515

 

 

$

3,267,486

 

 

$

1,260,239

 

 

$

399,240

 

 

$

(3,434,930

)

 

$

5,747,550

 

Capital expenditures

 

$

4,494

 

 

$

5,936

 

 

$

1,836

 

 

$

1,033

 

 

$

10,893

 

 

$

24,192

 

presentation.


 For the year ended December 31, 2016
(in thousands)Retail 
National
Programs
 
Wholesale
Brokerage
 Services Other Total
Total revenues$917,406
 $448,516
 $243,103
 $156,365
 $1,239
 $1,766,629
Investment income$37
 $628
 $4
 $283
 $504
 $1,456
Amortization$43,447
 $27,920
 $10,801
 $4,485
 $10
 $86,663
Depreciation$6,191
 $7,868
 $1,975
 $1,881
 $3,088
 $21,003
Interest expense$38,216
 $45,738
 $3,976
 $4,950
 $(53,399) $39,481
Income before income taxes$188,001
 $91,762
 $62,623
 $24,338
 $56,775
 $423,499
Total assets$3,854,393
 $2,711,378
 $1,108,829
 $371,645
 $(2,758,902) $5,287,343
Capital expenditures$5,951
 $6,977
 $1,301
 $656
 $2,880
 $17,765
 For the year ended December 31, 2015
(in thousands)Retail 
National
Programs
 
Wholesale
Brokerage
 Services Other Total
Total revenues$870,346
 $428,734
 $216,996
 $145,365
 $(932) $1,660,509
Investment income$87
 $210
 $150
 $42
 $515
 $1,004
Amortization$45,145
 $28,479
 $9,739
 $4,019
 $39
 $87,421
Depreciation$6,558
 $7,250
 $2,142
 $1,988
 $2,952
 $20,890
Interest expense$41,036
 $55,705
 $891
 $5,970
 $(64,354) $39,248
Income before income taxes$181,938
 $67,673
 $64,708
 $19,713
 $68,527
 $402,559
Total assets$3,507,476
 $2,505,752
 $895,782
 $285,459
 $(2,189,990) $5,004,479
Capital expenditures$6,797
 $6,001
 $3,084
 $1,088
 $1,405
 $18,375
 For the year ended December 31, 2014
(in thousands)Retail 
National
Programs
 
Wholesale
Brokerage
 Services Other Total
Total revenues$823,686
 $404,239
 $211,911
 $136,558
 $(598) $1,575,796
Investment income$67
 $164
 $26
 $3
 $487
 $747
Amortization$42,935
 $25,129
 $10,703
 $4,135
 $39
 $82,941
Depreciation$6,449
 $7,805
 $2,470
 $2,213
 $1,958
 $20,895
Interest expense$43,502
 $49,663
 $1,294
 $7,678
 $(73,729) $28,408
Income before income taxes$157,491
 $73,178
 $8,276
 $17,870
 $82,934
 $339,749
Total assets$3,229,484
 $2,455,749
 $857,804
 $296,034
 $(1,892,511) $4,946,560
Capital expenditures$6,873
 $14,133
 $1,526
 $1,210
 $1,181
 $24,923



NOTE 16· Reinsurance

18 Insurance Company WNFIC

Although the reinsurers are liable to the Company for amounts reinsured, our subsidiary, WNFIC remains primarily liable to its policyholders for the full amount of the policies written whether or not the reinsurers meet their obligations to the Company when they become due. The effects of reinsurance on premiums written and earned at December 31 are as follows:

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

(in thousands)

 

Written

 

 

Earned

 

 

Written

 

 

Earned

 

Direct premiums

 

$

697,072

 

 

$

668,971

 

 

$

619,223

 

 

$

602,320

 

Assumed premiums

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ceded premiums

 

 

697,059

 

 

 

668,958

 

 

 

619,206

 

 

 

602,303

 

Net premiums

 

$

13

 

 

$

13

 

 

$

17

 

 

$

17

 

 2016 2015
(in thousands)Written Earned Written Earned
Direct premiums$591,142
 $592,123
 $599,828
 $610,753
Assumed premiums
 
 
 18
Ceded premiums591,124
 592,105
 599,807
 610,750
Net premiums$18
 $18
 $21
 $21

78


Table of Contents

All premiums written by WNFIC under the National Flood Insurance Program are 100%100.0% ceded to FEMA, for which WNFIC received a 30.9%30.0% expense allowance from January 1, 20162019 through September 30, 2019 and a 30.1% expense allowance from October 1, 2019 through December 31, 2016.2019. As of December 31, 20162019 and 2015,2018, the Company ceded $589.5$694.9 million and $598.4$617.2 million of written premiums, respectively.

Effective April 1, 2014, WNFIC is also a party to a quota share agreement whereby it cedes 100% of its gross excess flood premiums, excluding fees, to Arch Reinsurance Company and receives a 30.5% commission. WNFIC ceded $1.6 million and $1.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015. No loss data exists on this agreement.
WNFIC also ceded 100%, of the Homeowners, Private Passenger Auto Liability, and Other Liability Occurrence to Stillwater Insurance Company, formerly known as Fidelity National Insurance Company. This business is in runoff. Therefore, only loss data still exists on this business.

As of December 31, 2016, ceded unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses for Homeowners, Private Passenger Auto Liability and Other Liability Occurrence was $5,262, $0 and $95, respectively. There was no incurred but not reported balance for Homeowners, Private Passenger Auto Liability and Other Liability Occurrence.

As of December 31, 20162019, the Consolidated Balance SheetSheets contained Reinsurance recoverable of $78.1$58.5 million and Prepaid reinsurance premiums of $308.7$366.0 million. As of December 31, 20152018, the Consolidated Balance SheetSheets contained reinsurance recoverable of $32.0$65.4 million and prepaid reinsurance premiums of $309.6$337.9 million. There was no0 net activity in the reserve for losses and loss adjustment expense for the yearsyear ended December 31, 20162019, and 2015,$0.2 million net activity in the reserve for losses and loss adjustment expense for the year ended December 31, 2018, as WNFIC’s direct premiums written were 100%100.0% ceded to two2 reinsurers. The balance of the reserve for losses and loss adjustment expense, excluding related reinsurance recoverablerecoverables was $78.1$58.5 million as of December 31, 20162019 and $32.0$65.4 million as of December 31, 2015.
NOTE 17· Statutory Financial Information
2018.

WNFIC maintains capital in excess of minimum statutory amount of $7.5 million as required by regulatory authorities. The statutory capital and surplus of WNFIC was $23.5$29.6 million as of December 31, 20162019 and $15.1$19.4 million as of December 31, 2015.2018. As of December 31, 20162019 and 2015,2018, WNFIC generated statutory net income of $8.2$8.1 million and $4.1$4.5 million, respectively.

NOTE 18· Subsidiary Dividend Restrictions
Under the insurance regulations of Texas, where WNFIC in incorporated, the The maximum amount of ordinary dividends that WNFIC can pay to shareholders in a rolling twelve12 month period is limited to the greater of 10%10.0% of statutory adjusted capital and surplus as shown on WNFIC’s last annual statement on file with the superintendent of the Texas Department of Insurance or 100%100.0% of adjusted net income. There was no dividend payout in 20162018 and 2019 and the maximum dividend payout that may be made in 20172020 without prior approval is $8.2$8.1 million.

NOTE 19·19  Shareholders’ Equity

On July 18, 2014, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $200.0 million of its shares of common stock. This was in addition to the $25.0 million that was authorized in the first quarter and executed in the second quarter of 2014. On September 2, 2014, the Company entered into an accelerated share repurchase agreement (“ASR”) with an investment bank to purchase an aggregate $50.0 million of the Company’s common stock. The total number of shares purchased under the ASR of 1,539,760 was determined upon settlement of the final delivery and was based upon the Company’s volume weighted-average price per its common share over the ASR period less a discount.
On March 5, 2015, the Company entered into an ASR with an investment bank to purchase an aggregate $100.0 million of the Company’s common stock. As part of the ASR, the Company received an initial delivery of 2,667,992 shares of the Company’s common stock with a fair market value of approximately $85.0 million. On August 6, 2015, the Company was notified by its investment bank that the March 5, 2015 ASR agreement between the Company and the investment bank had been completed in accordance with the terms of the agreement.

The investment bank delivered to the Company an additional 391,637 shares of the Company’s common stock for a total of 3,059,629 shares repurchased under the agreement. The delivery of the remaining 391,637 shares occurred on August 11, 2015. At the conclusion of this contract the Company had authorization for $50.0 million of share repurchases under the original Board authorization.
On July 20, 2015, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to an additional $400.0 million of the Company’s outstanding common stock. With this authorization, the Company had total available approval to repurchase up to $450.0 million, in the aggregate, of the Company’s outstanding common stock.
On November 11, 2015, the Company entered into a third ASR with an investment bank to purchase an aggregate $75.0 million of the Company’s common stock. The Company received an initial delivery of 1,985,981 shares of the Company’s common stock with a fair market value of approximately $63.8 million. On January 6, 2016 this agreement was completed by the investment bank with the delivery of 363,209 shares of the Company’s common stock. After completion of this third ASR, the Company has approval to repurchase up to $375.0 million, in the aggregate, of the Company’s outstanding common stock.
Between October 25, 2016 and November 4, 2016, the Company made share repurchases in the open market in total of 209,618 shares at a total cost of $7.7 million. After completing these open market share repurchases, the Company’s outstanding Board approved share repurchase authorization is $367.3 million.

Under the authorization from the Company’s Board of Directors, shares may be purchased from time to time, at the Company’s discretion and subject to the availability of stock, market conditions, the trading price of the stock, alternative uses for capital, the Company’s financial performance and other potential factors. These purchases may be carried out through open market purchases, block trades, accelerated share repurchase plans of up to $100.0 million each (unless otherwise approved by the Board of Directors), negotiated private transactions or pursuant to any trading plan that may be adopted in accordance with Rule 10b5-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.



On May 1, 2019, the Company's Board of Directors authorized the purchasing of up to an additional $372.5 million of the Company's outstanding common stock.

During 2017, the Company repurchased 2,883,349 shares at an average price of $48.51 for a total cost of $139.9 million under the current share repurchase authorization. During 2018, the Company entered into accelerated share repurchase agreement (“ASR”) with an investment bank to purchase an aggregate $100.0 million of the Company’s common stock. As part of the ASR, the company received an initial share delivery of 2,910,150 shares of the Company’s common stock with a fair market value of approximately $80.0 million in 2018. On May 17, 2019, this agreement was completed with the delivery of 566,599 shares of the Company’s common stock. In addition to the settlement of the ASR, during 2019, the Company made share repurchases in the open market of 1,087,914 shares at a total cost of $38.7 million, at an average price of $35.55 per share. At December 31, 2019, the remaining amount authorized by our Board of Directors for share repurchases was approximately $461.3 million. Under the authorized repurchase programs, the Company has repurchased a total of approximately 15.5 million shares for an aggregate cost of approximately $536.2 million between 2014 and 2019. The aforementioned share amounts have not been adjusted for the March 28, 2018 2-for-1 stock split, as treasury shares did not participate in this stock split transaction.

79


Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the shareholders and the Board of Directors and Shareholders of

Brown & Brown, Inc.
Daytona Beach, Florida

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Brown & Brown, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”"Company") as of December 31, 20162019 and 2015, and2018, the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’shareholders' equity, and cash flows, for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016. These financial statements are2019, and the responsibility ofrelated notes (collectively referred to as the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an"financial statements"). In our opinion, on the financial statements based on our audits.

present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We conducted our auditshave also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). (PCAOB), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 24, 2020, expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

Adoption of New Accounting Standards

As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has changed its method of accounting for leases on January 1, 2019, on a modified retrospective basis due to the adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification 842, Leases, and related amendments.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includesmisstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence supportingregarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An auditOur audits also includes assessingincluded evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statement presentation.statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matter

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

Earn-out obligation — Refer to Notes 1 (Goodwill and Amortizable Intangible Assets) and 3 (Business Combinations) to the financial statements

Critical Audit Matter Description

The Company’s acquisition purchase price for business combinations is typically based upon a multiple of average annual operating profit and/or revenue earned over a one to three-year period within a minimum and maximum price range. The recorded purchase prices for most acquisitions include an estimation of the fair value of liabilities associated with potential earn-out provisions, when an earn-out obligation is part of the negotiated transaction. The fair value of the earn-out obligations is based upon the present value of the expected future payments to be made to the sellers of the acquired businesses in accordance with the provisions contained in the respective purchase agreements.  Subsequent changes in the fair value of the earn-out obligations are recorded in the consolidated statement of income when incurred.  

80


Table of Contents

In determining fair value of the earn-out obligation, the acquired business’s future performance is estimated using financial projections of future earnings developed by management that are discounted to a present value using a risk-adjusted rate that takes into consideration the likelihood that the forecasted earn-out obligation will be paid. The earn-out obligation balance was $161.5 million as of December 31, 2019 and the potential maximum earn-out obligation was $328.7 million.  Of the total earn-out obligation balance, $17.9 million is recorded as accounts payable and $143.6 million is recorded as other non-current liability.

We identified the earn-out obligation as a critical audit matter because of the increased auditor judgment and extent of effort required to evaluate whether an adjustment is required for the earn-out obligation in periods after the acquisition.  Specifically, there was a high degree of auditor judgment and an increased extent of effort to audit the reasonableness of management’s assumptions related to projections of future earnings of the acquired businesses.

How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit

Our audit procedures related to the forecasted future earnings assumptions used in determining the fair value of the earn-out obligation included the following, among others:

We tested the effectiveness of controls over management’s earn-out obligation calculation, including those controls over management’s determination of future earnings.

We read the asset/stock purchase agreements and associated addenda and agreed the provisions of the contracts to the earn-out obligation models.

We read any post acquisition asset/stock purchase agreements and associated addenda modifications for any additional terms to evaluate the completeness and reasonableness of the models utilized to calculate the earn-out obligation.

We evaluated the reasonableness of projections of future earnings for the earn-out obligation models by comparing the projections to historical results and assessing management’s key assumptions.

We evaluated management’s ability to accurately forecast future earnings by comparing actual results to management’s historical forecast and forecasted growth rates to that of the overall industry and comparable companies.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Certified Public Accountants

Tampa, Florida

February 24, 2020

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2002.

81


Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the shareholders and the board of directors of Brown & Brown, Inc.

Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework: (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly,the Company maintained, in all material respects, theeffective internal control over financial position of Brown & Brown, Inc. and subsidiariesreporting as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years2019, based on criteria established in the period ended December 31, 2016, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019, of the Company and our report dated February 24, 2020, expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements and included an explanatory paragraph regarding the Company’s adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification 842, Leases, and related amendments.

As described in Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, management excluded from its assessment the internal control over financial reporting at CKP Insurance, LLC, Poole Professional Ltd. Insurance Agents and Brokers et al, Innovative Risk Solutions, Inc., Medval, LLC, Twinbrook Insurance Brokerage, Inc., VerHagen Glendenning & Walker LLP, United Development Systems, Inc., AGA Enterprises, LLC d/b/a Cossio Insurance Agency, West Ridge Insurance Agency, Inc. d/b/a Yozell Associates, and Izzo Insurance Services, Inc. which were acquired in 2019 and whose financial statements constitute approximately (0.26) and 5.20 percent of net and total assets, respectively, 1.13 percent of revenues, and (1.39) percent of net income of the consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019. Accordingly, our audit did not include the internal control over financial reporting of these acquired entities.

Basis for Opinion

The Company's management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements and an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB") and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Certified Public Accountants

Tampa, Florida

February 24, 2020

82


Table of Contents

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

The management of Brown & Brown, Inc. and its subsidiaries (“Brown & Brown”) is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). Under the supervision and with the participation of December 31, 2016,management, including Brown & Brown’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, Brown & Brown conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting based onupon the criteria establishedframework in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 24, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion on(“COSO”).

In conducting Brown & Brown’s evaluation of the Company’seffectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting.

reporting, Brown & Brown has excluded the following acquisitions completed by Brown & Brown during 2019: CKP Insurance, LLC, Poole Professional Ltd. Insurance Agents and Brokers et al, Innovative Risk Solutions, Inc., Medval, LLC, Twinbrook Insurance Brokerage, Inc., VerHagen Glendenning & Walker LLP, United Development Systems, Inc., AGA Enterprises, LLC d/b/a Cossio Insurance Agency, West Ridge Insurance Agency, Inc. d/b/a Yozell Associates, and Izzo Insurance Services, Inc. (collectively the “2019 Excluded Acquisitions”), which were acquired during 2019 and whose financial statements constitute approximately (0.26%) and 5.20% of net and total assets, respectively, 1.13% of revenues, and (1.39%) of net income of the consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019. Refer to Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of these acquisitions and their impact on Brown & Brown’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

Based upon Brown & Brown’s evaluation under the framework in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, management concluded that internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2019. Management’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019 has been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which is included herein.

Brown & Brown, Inc.

Daytona Beach, Florida

February 24, 2020

/s/ J. Powell Brown

/s/ R. Andrew Watts

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

J. Powell Brown

Chief Executive Officer

Certified Public Accountants

Miami, Florida
February 24, 2017

R. Andrew Watts

Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer



83


Table of Contents

ITEM 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants and Financial Disclosure.

There were no changes in or disagreements with accountants on accounting and financial disclosure in 2016.

2019.

ITEM 9A. Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We carried out an evaluation (the “Evaluation”) required by Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rule 13a-15 and 15d-15 under the Exchange Act (“Disclosure Controls”) as of December 31, 2016.2019. Based upon the Evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that the design and operation of our Disclosure Controls were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms and (ii) accumulated and communicated to our senior management, including our CEO and CFO, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

Changes in Internal Controls

There has not been any change in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the Evaluation that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2016,2019, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Inherent Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management, including our CEO and CFO, does not expect that our Disclosure Controls and internal controls will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control.

The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, a control may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

CEO and CFO Certifications

Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2 are the Certifications of the CEO and the CFO, respectively. The Certifications are supplied in accordance with Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “Section 302 Certifications”). This Item 9A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K contains the information concerning the evaluation referred to in the Section 302 Certifications and this information should be read in conjunction with the Section 302 Certifications for a more complete understanding of the topics presented.



REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Brown & Brown, Inc.
Daytona Beach, Florida
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Brown & Brown, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. As described in Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, management excluded from its assessment the internal control over financial reporting at Social Security Advocates for the Disabled, LLC, Morstan General Agency, Inc., and The Insurance House, Inc. (collectively the “2016 Excluded Acquisitions”), which were acquired during 2016 and whose financial statements constitute 3.0% of total assets, 1.5% of revenues, and 0.9% of net income of the consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016. Accordingly, our audit did not include the internal control over financial reporting of the 2016 Excluded Acquisitions. The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company’s board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on the criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016 of the Company and our report dated February 24, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Certified Public Accountants
Miami, Florida
February 24, 2017



Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
The management of Brown & Brown, Inc. and its subsidiaries (“Brown & Brown”) is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including Brown & Brown’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, Brown & Brown conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting based upon the framework in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”).
In conducting Brown & Brown’s evaluation of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting, Brown & Brown has excluded the following acquisitions completed during 2016: Social Security Advocates for the Disabled, LLC, Morstan General Agency, Inc., and The Insurance House, Inc. (collectively the “2016 Excluded Acquisitions”), which were acquired during 2016 and whose financial statements constitute 3.0% of total assets, 1.5% of revenues, and 0.9% of net income of the consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016. Refer to Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of these acquisitions and their impact on Brown & Brown’s Consolidated Financial Statements.
Based upon Brown & Brown’s evaluation under the framework in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, management concluded that internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2016. Management’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016 has been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which is included herein.
Brown & Brown, Inc.
Daytona Beach, Florida
February 24, 2017
/s/ J. Powell Brown/s/ R. Andrew Watts
J. Powell Brown
Chief Executive Officer
R. Andrew Watts
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer


ITEM 9B. Other Information.

None

PART III

ITEM 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

Set forth below is certain information concerning our executive officers as of February 27, 2017.24, 2020. All officers hold office for one-year terms or until their successors are elected and qualified.

J. Hyatt Brown

Chairman

82

J. Powell Brown

President and Chief Executive Officer

52

Richard A. Freebourn, Sr.

P. Barrett Brown

Executive Vice President; President - Internal Operations– Retail Segment

69

47

Robert W. Lloyd

Executive Vice President; Secretary and General Counsel

52

55

J. Scott Penny

Executive Vice President; Chief Acquisitions Officer

50

53

Julie K. Ryan

Executive Vice President; Chief People Officer

48

Anthony T. Strianese

Executive Vice President; President - Wholesale Brokerage DivisionSegment

55

58

Chris L. Walker

Executive Vice President; President - National Programs DivisionSegment

59

62

R. Andrew Watts

Executive Vice President; Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

48

51

Richard A. Freebourn, Sr.

J. Hyatt Brown. Mr. FreebournBrown was appointedour Chief Executive Officer from 1993 to 2009 and our President from 1993 to December 2002, and served as President and Chief Executive Officer of our predecessor corporation from 1961 to 1993. He was a member of the Florida House of Representatives from 1972 to 1980, and Speaker of the House from 1978 to 1980. Mr. Brown served on the Board of Directors of International Speedway Corporation, a publicly held company, until 2019. Mr. Brown is a member of the Board of Trustees of Stetson University, of which he is a past Chairman, and the Florida Council of 100. Mr. Hyatt Brown’s sons, J. Powell Brown and P. Barrett Brown, are employed by us as President and Chief Executive Officer, and as Executive Vice President - Internal Operations, and People Officer, respectively, in September 2014. Prior to that he hadPresident – Retail Segment, respectively.  His son, J. Powell Brown, has served as Vice President, Internal Operationsa director since 2004 after serving as Director, Internal Operations commencingOctober 2007.

J. Powell Brown. Mr. Brown was named Chief Executive Officer in 2002.July 2009. He has been responsible for acquisition due diligence from 2002 through the present.  From 2000 until 2002,our President since January 2007 and was appointed to be a director in October 2007. Prior to 2007, he served as one of our DirectorRegional Executive Vice Presidents since 2002. Mr. Brown was previously responsible for overseeing certain or all parts of Internal Audit,all of our segments over the years, and from 1998 until 2000, he wasworked in various capacities throughout the Company since joining us in 1995. Mr. Brown has served on the Board of Directors of WestRock Company (formerly RockTenn Company), a publicly held company, since January 2010. He is the son of our Chairman, J. Hyatt Brown, and brother of our Executive Vice President and Operations Leader ofPresident – Retail Segment, P. Barrett Brown.

P. Barrett Brown. Mr. Brown was appointed as the Indianapolis, Indiana office of onePresident of our Retail Division subsidiaries.Segment in January 2020. He previously served as a Senior Vice President from 2014 until January 2020 and as a Regional President in the Retail Segment from September 2015 until January 2020.  Mr. Freebourn has been employed by us since 1984.  He originallyBrown joined the Company in 2000 and has served in various roles, including as partthe profit center leader and an account executive in our Tampa, Florida retail office, as the profit center leader and an account executive in our Orange, California retail office, and as an account executive in our Phoenix, Arizona retail office.  He has also overseen certain aspects of  an acquisition in Fort Myers, Florida, where he was“Brown & Brown University,” a training program offering technical and sales courses for new producers, office leaders, and other groups within the Accounting Leader and eventually the Personal Lines, Commercial Lines and Operations Leader through 1997. In his role as People Officer, Mr. Freebourn is responsible for developing recruiting and mentoring strategies in the areas of sales, finance, human resources, information technology and insurance operations.organization. He is also responsible for the oversightson of all traditional human resources functions.

our Chairman, J. Hyatt Brown, and brother of our President and Chief Executive Officer, J. Powell Brown.

Robert W. Lloyd.  Mr. Lloyd has served as our General Counsel since 2009 and as Executive Vice President and Corporate Secretary since 2014. He previously served as Vice President from 2006 to 2014, Chief Litigation Officer from 2006 until 2009 and as Assistant General Counsel from 2001 until 2006. Prior to that, he worked as sales manager and marketing manager, respectively, in our Daytona Beach, Florida retail office.  While working in a sales role, Mr. Lloyd qualified for the Company’s top producer honors (Tangle B) in 2001 and2001. He has also earned his Chartered Property Casualty Underwriter (CPCU) and Certified Insurance Counselor (CIC) designation.designations.  Before joining us, Mr. Lloyd practiced law and served as outside counsel to the Company with the law firm of Cobb & Cole, P.A. in Daytona Beach, Florida.  Mr. Lloyd is a RotarianRotarian; Chairman of the Daytona Beach Regional Chamber of Commerce; a director of the Council on Aging of Volusia County; and a member of the ExecutiveAdvisory Board of the Central Florida Council - Boy Scouts of America. In 2015,2019, Mr. Lloyd was appointed as an independent directorby Florida Governor Ron Desantis to the Board of Raydon Corporation, a private company based in Port Orange, Florida.

Trustees of Daytona State College.

J. Scott Penny.Mr. Penny has been our Chief Acquisitions Officer since 2011, and he serves as director and as an executive officer for several of our subsidiaries. He served as a Regional President from 2010 to 2014 and Regional Executive Vice President from 2002 to July 2010. From 1999 until January 2003, Mr. Penny served as profit center leader of our Indianapolis, Indiana retail office. Prior to that, Mr. Penny served as profit center leader of our Jacksonville, Florida retail office from 1997 to 1999. From 1989 to 1997, Mr. Penny was employed as an account executive and marketing representative in our Daytona Beach, Florida office.

Anthony T. Strianese.Mr. Strianese has served as President of our Wholesale Brokerage DivisionSegment since 2014. He served as Regional President from 2012 to 2014 and Regional Executive Vice President from July 2007 to January 2012, and serves as director and as an executive officer for several of our subsidiaries. Mr. Strianese’s responsibilities for our Wholesale Brokerage DivisionSegment include oversight of the operations of Peachtree Special Risk Brokers, LLC, Hull & Company, Inc., ECC Insurance Brokers, Inc., MacDuff Underwriters, Inc. and Decus Insurance Brokers Limited, which commenced operations in 2008 in London, England. Additionally, Mr. Strianese is responsible for certain of our public

85


Table of Contents

entity operations located in Georgia, Texas and Virginia. Mr. Strianese joined Brown & Brownthe Company in January 2000 and helped form Peachtree Special Risk Brokers. Prior to joining us, he held leadership positions with The Home Insurance Company and Tri-City Brokers in New York City.

Chris L. Walker.Mr. Walker was appointed President of our National Programs DivisionSegment in 2014. He served as Regional Executive Vice President from 2012 to 2014. Mr. Walker is responsible for our National Programs Division.Segment. He has also served as Chief Executive Officer of Arrowhead since 2012. He has been involved with Arrowhead’s business development strategies, product expansion, acquisitions and the overall operations and infrastructure since joining the organization in 2003. Prior to that, he served as Vice Chairman of Aon Re. Mr. Walker’s insurance career began with the reinsurance intermediary E.W. Blanch Co., where he ultimately served as Chairman and CEO of E.W. Blanch Holdings. He previously served as Chairman of the Brokers and Reinsurance Markets Association.


R. Andrew Watts.Mr. Watts joined the Company as Executive Vice President and Treasurer in February 2014, and aswas appointed Chief Financial Officer effective March 4, 2014. Prior to joining the Company, he had served as Global Head of Customer Administration for Thomson Reuters since 2011, and from 2008 to 2011, he acted as Chief Financial Officer for multiple segments within the Financial and Risk Division of Thomson Reuters. Prior to 2001, Mr. Watts was the Chief Financial Officer and Co-founder of Textera, an internet start-up company, and worked as a Senior Manager with PricewaterhouseCoopers for nine years. Mr. Watts is a Certified Public Accountant (CPA) and holds a Bachelor of Science degree from Illinois State University. He was previously the Chairman of the Board for Surflight Theatre from January 2013 through February 2014 and served on that board from July 2012 until February 2014.  He was previously the Chairman of the Board for Make-A-Wish Foundation of New Jersey from 2005 through 2007 and served on that board from 2000 through 2007.

The additional information required by this item regarding directors and executive officers is incorporated herein by reference to our definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC in connection with the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held in 20172020 (the “2017“2020 Proxy Statement”) under the headings “Board and Corporate Governance Matters” and “Other Important Information.” We have adopted a code of ethics that applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, and controller. A copy of our Code of Ethics for our Chief Executive Officer and our Senior Financial Officers and a copy of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics applicable to all employees are posted on our Internet website, at www.bbinsurance.com, and are also available upon written request directed to Corporate Secretary, 220 Brown & Brown, Inc., South Ridgewood Avenue, Daytona Beach, Florida 32114, or by telephone to (386) 252-9601. Any approved amendments to, or waiver of, any provision of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics will be posted on our website at the above address.

ITEM 11. Executive Compensation.

The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the 20172020 Proxy Statement under the heading “Compensation Matters.”

ITEM 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholders Matters.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table sets forth information as of December 31, 2019, with respect to compensation plans under which the Company’s equity securities are authorized for issuance:

A

Plan Category

Number of securities

remaining available

for future issuance

under equity

compensation plans(1)

Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders:

Brown & Brown, Inc. 2019 Stock Incentive Plan

9,515,603

(2)

Brown & Brown, Inc. 2010 Stock Incentive Plan

Brown & Brown, Inc. 1990 Employee Stock Purchase Plan

6,340,598

Brown & Brown, Inc. Performance Stock Plan

Total

15,856,201

Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders

(1)

All of the shares available for future issuance under the Brown & Brown, Inc. Performance Stock Plan, and the Brown & Brown, Inc. 2019 Stock Incentive Plan may be issued in connection with options, warrants, rights, restricted stock, or other stock-based awards.

(2)

The payout for 1,629,618 shares of our outstanding performance-based restricted stock grants may be increased up to 200% of the target or decreased to zero, subject to the level of performance attained. The amount reflected in the table is calculated assuming the maximum payout for all restricted stock grants.

The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the 20172020 Proxy Statement under the heading “Security Ownership of Management and Certain Beneficial Owners.”

Information regarding equity compensation plans required by this item is included in Item 5

86


Table of Part II of this report and is incorporated into this item by reference.

The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the 20172020 Proxy Statement under the headings “Director Independence,” “Related Party Transactions Policy” and “Relationships and Transactions with Affiliated Parties.”

ITEM 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.

The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the 20172020 Proxy Statement under the heading “Fees Paid to Deloitte & Touche LLP.”

PART IV

ITEM 15. Exhibits and Financial Statements Schedules.

The following documents are filed as part of this Report:

1. Financial statements

Reference is made to the information set forth in Part II, Item 8 of this Report, which information is incorporated by reference.

2. Consolidated Financial Statement Schedules.

All required Financial Statement Schedules are included in the Consolidated Financial Statements or the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


3. Exhibits

The following exhibits are filed as a part of this Report:

    3.1

    3.1

Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation (adopted February 26, 2018) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Form 8-K filed March 29, 2018 and Articles of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation (adopted April 24, 2003) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3a to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003)2003), and Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3a to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1999).

    3.2

Bylaws (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Form 8-K filed on October 12, 2016).

    4.1

    4.1**

Indenture, dated as

Description of September 18, 2014, between the Registrant and U.S. Bank National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K filed on September 18, 2014).Registrant’s capital stock.

    4.2

First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 18, 2014, between the Registrant and U.S. Bank National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Form 8-K filed on September 18, 2014).

    4.3

Form of the Registrant’s 4.200% Notes due 2024 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Form 8-K filed on September 18, 2014).

  10.1

    4.4

Lease

Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 11, 2019, between the Registrant for office space at 220 South Ridgewood Avenue, Daytona Beach, Florida dated August 15, 1987and U.S. Bank National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10a(3)4.2 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,1993), as amended by Letter Agreement dated June 26, 1995; First Amendment to Lease dated August 2, 1999; Second Amendment to Lease dated December 11, 2001; Third Amendment to Lease dated August 8, 2002; Fourth Amendment to Lease dated October 26, 20048-K filed on March 12, 2019).

    4.6

Form of Registrant’s 4.500% Notes due 2029 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2(a)4.3 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005); Fifth Amendment to Lease dated 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1(a) to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010); Sixth Amendment to Lease dated August 17, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1(a) to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010); Seventh Amendment to Lease dated8-K filed on March 25, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1(a) to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012); Eighth Amendment to Lease dated April 16, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1(a) to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012); and Ninth Amendment to Lease dated December 5, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1(a) to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012)12, 2019).

  10.2

  10.1(a)*

Indemnity Agreement dated January 1, 1979, among the Registrant, Whiting National Management, Inc., and Pennsylvania Manufacturers’ Association Insurance Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10g to Registration Statement No. 33-58090 on Form S-4).

  10.3Agency Agreement dated January 1, 1979 among the Registrant, Whiting National Management, Inc., and Pennsylvania Manufacturers’ Association Insurance Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10h to Registration Statement No.33-58090 on Form S-4).
  10.4(a)

Employment Agreement, dated and effective as of July 1, 2009 between the Registrant and J. Hyatt Brown (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009).*

  10.4(b)

  10.1(b)*

Executive Employment Agreement, effective as of February 17, 2014, between the Registrant and R. Andrew Watts (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014).*

  10.4(c)

  10.1(c)*

Transition Equity Bonus Performance-Triggered Stock Grant Agreement, effective as of February 17, 2014, between the Registrant and R. Andrew Watts (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014).*

  10.4(d)

Form of Employment Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2014).*

  10.4(e)

  10.1(d)*

Employment Agreement, dated as of January 9, 2012, between the Registrant and Chris L. Walker (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013).*

  10.4(f)

  10.1(e)*

Transition

Employment Agreement, dated and effective as of July 1, 2016November 16, 2018, between the Registrant and Charles H. LydeckerJames C. Hays (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.310.1(e) to Form 10-Q10-K for the quarteryear ended November 30, 2016)December 31, 2019).*

  10.4(g)

  10.2(a)*

Consulting Agreement dated and effective as of July 1, 2016 between the Registrant and Charles H. Lydecker (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 30, 2016).*

  10.5Registrant’s 2000 Incentive Stock Option Plan for Employees (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4 to Registration Statement No. 333-43018 on Form S-8 filed on August 3, 2000).*
  10.6(a)

Registrant’s Stock Performance Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4 to Registration Statement No. 333-14925 on Form S-8 filed on October 28, 1996).*


88


Table of Contents

  10.4(b)*

  10.8(b)

Form of Performance-Triggered Stock Grant Agreement under 2010 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed on July 8, 2013).*

10.8(c)

  10.4(c)*

Form of Performance Stock Award Agreement under the 2010 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.110.5(c) to Form 8-K10-K filed on March 23, 2016)February 28, 2018).*

10.8(d)

  10.4(d)*

Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the 2010 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K filed on March 23, 2016).*

10.8(e)

  10.4(e)

Form of Director Stock Grant Agreement

  10.9Amended and Restated Revolving and Term Loan Credit Agreement dated as of January 9, 2012 by and between the Registrant and SunTrust Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1710.8(e) to Form 10-K filed for the year ended December 31, 2011)2016).

  10.10

  10.5

Promissory Note dated January 9, 2012, by

Amended and between Registrant and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011).

  10.11Letter Agreement dated January 9, 2012 by and between Registrant and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011).
  10.12Term Loan Agreement dated as of January 26, 2012 by and between the Registrant and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011).
10.13Merger Agreement, dated May 21, 2013, among Brown & Brown, Inc., Brown & Brown Merger Co., Beecher Carlson Holdings, Inc., and BC Sellers’ Representative LLC, solely in its capacity as the representative of Beecher’s shareholders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2013).
10.14Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among The Wright Insurance Group, LLC, the Registrant, Brown & Brown Acquisition Group, LLC and Teiva Securityholders Representative, LLC, solely in its capacity as the Representative dated January 15, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014).
10.15Restated Credit Agreement dated as of April 16, 2014,June 28, 2017, among the Registrant, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Bank of America, N.A., Royal Bank of Canada and SunTrust Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.410.1 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2017).

  10.6

Settlement Agreement, dated March 1, 2017, by and among the Registrant, AssuredPartners, Inc. and certain of its employees and former employees (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014)2017).

  10.7*

Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of October 22, 2018, by and among Brown & Brown, Inc., BBHG, Inc., The Hays Group, Inc., The Hays Group Of Wisconsin LLC, The Hays Benefits Group, LLC, PlanIT, LLC, The Hays Benefits Group of Wisconsin, LLC, and The Hays Group of Illinois, LLC, and Claims Management of Missouri, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019).

  10.8*

Term Loan Credit Agreement, dated December 21, 2018, by and among the Company, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent, Bank of America, N.A., BMO Harris Bank N.A. and SunTrust Bank as co-syndication agents, and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, BMO Capital Markets Corp. and SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, Inc. as joint lead arrangers and joint bookrunners (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019).

  21**

Subsidiaries of the Registrant.

  23

  23**

Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP.

  24

  24**

Powers of Attorney.

  31.1

  31.1**

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification by the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant.

  31.2

  31.2**

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification by the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant.

  32.1

  32.1**

Section 1350 Certification by the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant.

  32.2

  32.2**

Section 1350 Certification by the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant.

101.INS

Inline XBRL Instance Document.Document - the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.

101.SCH

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.

101.CAL

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.


101.DEF

101.DEF

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.

101.LAB

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.

101.PRE

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.

104

Cover Page Interactive Data File for the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, formatted Inline XBRL (included as Exhibit 101).

* Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement

** Filed herewith

ITEM 16. Form 10-K Summary.

None


Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

BROWN & BROWN, INC.

Registrant

Date: February 27, 201724, 2020

By:

/s/ J. Powell Brown

J. Powell Brown

President and Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.

Signature

Title

Date

/s/ J. Powell Brown

Director; President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

February 27, 201724, 2020

J. Powell Brown

/s/ R. Andrew Watts

Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

February 27, 201724, 2020

R. Andrew Watts

*

Chairman of the Board

February 27, 201724, 2020

J. Hyatt Brown

*

Director

February 27, 201724, 2020

Samuel P. Bell, III

*

Director

February 27, 201724, 2020

Hugh M. Brown

*

Director

February 27, 201724, 2020

Bradley Currey, Jr.

*

Director

February 27, 201724, 2020

Lawrence L. Gellerstedt

*

Director

February 24, 2020

James C. Hays

*

Director

February 24, 2020

Theodore J. Hoepner

*

Director

February 27, 201724, 2020

James S. Hunt

*

Director

February 27, 201724, 2020

Toni Jennings

*

Director

February 27, 201724, 2020

Timothy R.M. Main

*

Director

February 27, 201724, 2020

H. Palmer Proctor, Jr.

*

Director

February 27, 201724, 2020

Wendell Reilly

*

Director

February 27, 201724, 2020

Chilton D. Varner

*By:

/s/ Robert W. Lloyd

Robert W. Lloyd

Attorney-in-Fact


83

90